558 24 26018 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d92538e45d820436890bf2e2b6709f6b.pdf 7673167f0ba808930f8c66af16d93f4f PDF Text Text Agenda Item STATE OF IIIe MICHIGA:"l OF F I CE O F TH E GO V ERNOR JOHN ENGLER EXECUTIVE ORDER No.1993-24 MICIDGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION mcmGAN JOBS COMMISSION WHEREAS, this administration continues to be committed to encouraging all citizens, organizations and institutions in Michigan to help solve our most critical problems by volunteering their time, effort, energy and service; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to call upon the energy, compassion, inventiveness and entrepreneurial spirit of all citizens to help solve many of the problems facing their communities; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this -administration to discover and to encourage new community service leaders, to promote individuals, organizations and institutions that serve as outstanding examples of a commitment to serving others, and to convince all Michigan citizens that a successful life includes serving others; and WHEREAS, significant issues facing the state can be addressed by collaborative efforts involving committed citizens volunteering their time and talents, volunteer centers, community organizations, business and labor groups, and a host of other community and State agencies; and WHEREAS, the Michigan Community Service Commission, which was created pursuant to Executive Order 1991-25 and transferred to the Michigan Jobs Commission by Executive Order 1993-4, has experienced success in promoting volunteerism and community service; and WHEREAS, Public Law 103-82, the National and Community Service Trust Act, and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto require that state community service commissions be composed of certain members and perform certain duties in order to qualify for federal funds made available to states under the Act; and WHEREAS, the goals of this administration and the Act are facilitated by the creation of an organization within the State of Michigan designed to promote the foregoing objectives and to secure available federal funds for the purposes indicated. �NOW, THEREFORE, I, John Engler, Governor of the State ofMichigan, pursuant to the powers vested in me by the Constitution of the State of Michigan of 1963 and the laws of the State of Michigan, do hereby establish the Michigan Community Service Commission within the Michigan Jobs Commission. The Commission shall have the following responsibilities: 1. Develop a three-year comprehensive national and community service plan for the state that shall be updated annually; 2. Oversee and submit the state's applications to the Corporation for National and Community Service and other public and private funding sources; 3. Establish policies and procedures for the use of federal funds; and 4. Develop initiatives to promote community service in coordination with existing programs. The Commission shall include the following voting members and such other voting members as the Governor may appoint: 1. The superintendent of public instruction or his or her designee; 2. A representative of a community-based agency or organization in the state; A representative of local government; A representative of a labor organization; A representative of business; .. An individual between the ages of 16 and 25, inclusive, who is a participant or supervisor of a service program for school-age youth, or of a campus-based or national service program; 7. A representative of a national service program; 8. An individual with expertise in the educational, training and development needs of youth, particularly disadvantaged youth; and 9. An individual with experience in promoting the involvement of older adults (age 55 and older) in service and volunteerism. 3. 4. 5. 6. The Commission shall have a representative of the Corporation for National and Community Service as an ex officio member without the right to vote. The total number of Commission members shall be at least 15 but not more than 25. The members of the Commission shall be appointed by the Governor and shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor. Not more than 50 percent plus one of the members of the Commission shall be from the same political party. The voting members of the Commission who -are officers or employees of the state shall not exceed 25 percent of the total membership of the Commission. The voting members of the Commission shall select the Commission's chairperson by majority vote. The chairperson shall be selected from among the voting members of the Commission. The Governor may appoint other members of 2 ·-· -.c-a.•• �. ' the Com.mission as officers and such members shall serve as officers at the pleasure of the Governor. Members of the Commission shall serve three-year terms, except of those first appointed one-third shall serve three-year terms, one-third shall serve twoyear terms and one-third shall serve one-year terms. Terms will expire on the same day as the effective date of this order each year. Members of the Commission shall not receive compensation, but are entitled to necessary expenses for the performance of Commission functions based on existing state rates. The Commission shall function indefinitely and shall provide the Governor with an annual report that describes its activities during the preceding year. Annual reports shall be submitted not later than 60 days after the close of each fiscal year. The Commission shall have an executive director and such additional staff as may be required to carry out its mandate. The executive director of the Commission shall report directly to the Governor and to the Commission for the purpose of giving advice and making recommendations on programs and laws related to volunteerism and community service. All state departments and agencies shall cooperate with the Commission in the performance of its responsibilities. The Commission may request, and state agencies and departments shall provide, such policy and technical information as is required by the Commission in the discharge of its responsibilities. The Commission shall be subject.to the Open Meetings Act, Act No. 267 of the Public Act of 1976, being Section 15~261 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws, and shall be subject to the Freedom of Information Act, Act No. 442 of the Public Acts of 1976, being Section 15.231 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws. Executive Order 1991-25 is hereby rescinded. The provisions of this Executive Order shall become effective upon filing. Given under my hand and th~at Seal of the State of Michigan this day of December, in the Year of our Lord, One Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety-Three, and of the Commonwealth, One Hundred FiftySeven. BY~j;~ SECRETARY OF STATE Filed with Secretary of S:Jte � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Executive-Order Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting Executive Order Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting Executive Order. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49584 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6547bc39801dc9f0040a709b25d1de97.pdf d0732629c9ba455b04afc81c57d4c11d PDF Text Text --- Agenda Item MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING DATES FOR 1994 10:00 A.M. - 1:00 P.M. * THURSDAY, JANUARY 27, 1994 1:00 - 4:00 p.m. Host: Michigan Community Service Commission Location: Olds Plaza Building, 2nd floor FRIDAY, MAY 20, 1994 Host: Commissioner Gains and Blyth Location: Flint FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1994 Host: Commissioner Drake Location: Grand Rapids FRIDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1994 Host: Commissioner Ditch Murray I..ocation: Detroit MCSC - Executive Committee Meetings 9:00 a.m. - Noon Olds Plaza Building, 4th Floor Lansing, Michigan Friday, January 7, 1994 Friday, April29, 1994 Friday,August26,1994 Friday, November 18, 1994 *Time change due to Recognition Program on same date from 5:30p.m. - 8:30 p.m. in Lansing V(d) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Meeting-Dates-for-1994 Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting meeting dates for 1994 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting meeting dates for 1994. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49585 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/c46f2bce731ee1861367693be06ceaf5.pdf ca606dc1acd29e31f130966173c53434 PDF Text Text Agenda Item II Michigan Community Service Commission October 29, 1993 Alpena Community College 10:00 A.M.- 1:00 P.M. MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Michelle Engler VictorBegg Jon Blyth Dr. Mary Ellen Branden Beverly Drake Henry Gaines Terry Langston Sister Mary Martinez Vernie Nethercut Terry Pruitt, Jr. Sarah Riley Judy Reyes Diana R. Algra- Ex-Officio MEMBERS ABSENT: Julie Cummings Paul Hubbard Dorothy Johnson Lisa Ditch Murray Randy Neelis Dr. Joel Orosz Judith Riedlinger Michael Tate Geneva Jones Wi11iams OTHERS: Barbara Bradford, Michigan Department of Social Services Julie Busch, Michigan Campus Compact Kyle Caldwell, Michigan Community Service Commission EdwardS. Egnatios, On behalf of Geneva Williams, UCS Dave Egner, Michigan Nonprofit Forum Mary Estrada, Michigan Community Service Commission Bonnie Graham, Office on Aging Dr. Donald Newport, President of Alpena Community College Governor George Romney Sam Singh, YES Ambassador Stanley Stewart, ACTION �I. Welcome and Introduction of New and Reappointed Commj ssion Members The meeting was called to order at 10:15 a.m. by Chairperson Michelle Engler. Mrs. Engler welcomed the Commission members and the President of Alpena Community College, Dr. Donald Newport. Dr. Newport gave our Commission a warm welcome to the campus and a brief overview of some of Alpena's Community College initiatives in the field of community service. Mrs. Engler also welcomed special guest, Governor George Romney. II. Approval of Minutes ofJuly 23. 1993 and approval of next year meetin~ ~ A motion was made by Commission Blyth to approve the July 23, 1993 minutes. Commissioner Pruitt seconded the motion. The minutes were approved. I I I. Presentation on Alpena Community Colle~ Commissioner Nethercut introduced a number of special speakers from the campus that outlined the colleges initiatives with their Youth Volunteer Corps and their Higher Education grant. It is important to recognize that in Alpena the community college runs and host the area volunteer center. IV. Briefi~ on National Service Trust Act of 1993 Diana Algra gave an overview of the tentative requirements of the timeline and the National Service Trust Act of 1993. Final regulations are expected late fall to early winter. V. Presentation on State ACTION and Older American Pro~ams Bonnie Graham with the state Office on Aging made a presentation on behalf of Stan Stewart, our ACTION Director and on Older American Programs. The information provided allowed Commission members to see the variety of programs already in our state in the area ofVISTA, Action Projects, RSVP, Foster Grandparents and Senior Companion. 1 �VI. Fundin~ A. Recommendations for 1993-94 CNCS ~ants: K-12 - Diana Algra Diana Algra presented on behalf of Elaine Gordon the recommendations for our K-12 1993-94 grantees. This years RFP's generated 174 applications. After careful review by panel members fifty-eight (58) proposals are being recommended for funding. Twenty-five (25) are continuation grants from year one. These fiftyeight proposal total $592,057. The fifty-eight proposals break down into the following categories: 5 Statewide Planning and Capacity Building; 33 School Based Service Learning Programs; 9 Community Based Service Programs; 11 Adult Volunteer and Partnership Programs. B. Higher Education - Julie Busch Julie Busch presented the following recommendations regarding Higher Education Generation grants. The RFP's generated thirty-seven proposals with twenty-five being new and twelve being continuation. The proposal review committee recommended that eleven continuation grants and fourteen new grants be approved for funding. These twenty-five proposals t-otal $191,920. C. Corps - Diana Algra Diana Algra reported on the Corps proposals. Youth Volunteer Corps During the first funding cycle (1/1993-9/1993), the Michigan Community Service Commission provided funding to eight programs. Five were new initiatives and three had been in operation 1 to 2 years before. Our recommendation to the Commission is that we provide continuation funding to seven of the eight we funded last cycle. One of our agencies lost their funding in mid-year due to questions regarding their financial stability (Wayne Metro). United Community Services stepped in to pick up the void left when Wayne Metro closed its doors. 2 �New Youth volunteer Cor.ps Models Reguestin~ Fundin~ During our first request for proposal cycle for 1992-93, both Flint and Grand Rapids were sent availability of funds applications. Both decided not to pursue them at that time. We promised to maintain them on our data base for 1993-94 cycle. Both agencies decided to submit applications this cycle. Our funding camp to each was $10,000. Full-time Urban Cor.ps During our first funding cycle, the Michigan Community Service Commission provided funds to two communities; Flint and Grand Rapids. The Flint Youth Service Corps was a full-time corps already in operation. During its funding year it had 66 participants involved at various levels. Fifteen (15) participants completed their GED, nineteen (19) were placed in unsubsidized employment and six (6) continued their training in post-secondary education or skills trades. Unfortunately, due to reductions from their local JTPA, the program had to temporarily cease its program until additional funds could be secured. Their request is for a total of $58,895. This would be $28,295 of unexpended 92-93 funding and $30,600 of 93-94 funding. This funding level will pe~t the Flint Youth Service Corps to provide a corps opportunity for thirty-seven (37) youth. Total program cost is $290,184. Other funders are the City of Flint CDBG, JTPA and a grant from the Citizens Bank LOEB Trust. We are currently awaiting for Grand Rapids second year grant proposal. Our year one funding permitted the Grand Rapids community to establish a community-wide steering committee to explore the feasibility and support for a full-time urban corps that would be modeled after "City Year" in Boston. Tum over in the Program Director position delayed the start up of the project's planning grant. They have expressed a need for an additional year of funding that would permit them to finalize their community planning, establish and secure a fund development base and implement a summer pilot program. We anticipate their request to be no more than $30,000. A motion was made and seconded to approve the recommended proposals. All those in attendance voted in the affirmative. 3 �VII. Executive Director's Report Diana Algra briefed the Commission on the following initiatives: • MCSC has been involved with the National Service Coalition in helping develop the legislation forward and in assisting the Office on National Service and Commission on National and Community Service to establish some guidelines for states that are not as developed as Michigan. • We had Emilio Williams of National Association Service Conservation Corps visit our YEES directors, a site visit to Flint and one to Grand Rapids. • We have participated on two briefing on the new legislation in the area of higher education, one in Washington and one hosted by University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. • We have also provided on site help to the state of Missouri and Indiana in the development of their state commissions. • Note in your packet that a case study has been done on the state of Michigan. We were one of five states that had case studies developed on them in an effort to assist new state commissions in their development. • Mrs. Engler commended Diana Algra and Julie Busch for all the work they have done on the national level. Sometimes were known better on the national level than on the state level and we need to promote the Commission and commissioners more on a state level. As we move forward we should promote ourselves more statewide. • Dave Egner offered to do an article on the Michigan Community Service Commission in his newsletter in March. VIII.Committee Reports • MYPAC Update- Gwen Downs and Sarah Riley Gwen Downs thanked Sam Singh for all his help with the MYPAC as they finished their Annual Report. Gwen introduced the MYPAC Annual Report. Gwen talked about the Youth Action Forum in Alpena and Sarah talked about the Youth Action Forum in Mt. Pleasant, and what youths are doing in Mt. Pleasant. Diana talked about how our MYPAC is a model around the country. People are always calling and asking how Michigan went about forming its MYPAC. Diana also mentioned that our MYPAC received a $25,000 4 �grant on Youth Voice. Sam Singh talked about the annual report which was in the commissioners packet. • Commissioner Reyes mention that she was reviewing the 18 year old and younger for the Recognition Awards and was really impressed with the youth of Michigan by what there doing. • Recognition Committee- Diana Algra Overview and breakdown of sheet in packet. Received over 200 nominations. Diana explained who was on the review teams. The Recognition Event will now be held in January. Will give us more time to process the nominations. Invitations will go out in early January 1994. There will be a dinner and reception in Lansing. IX. Update on other CNCS • Fundin~ Youth Voice - Sam Singh Overview of grant award from National Commission of $25,000. This grant will be used to bring the MYPAC together three or four times a year. Will also be a Recognition program. Program visit highlight some of the quality programs that are happening in different parts of the state and have people from other areas of the state to come in and take a look at the programs so they can take the idea back to their area. So some of the money. will be used for travel stipends. Youth Action Forum - money will have programs in different cities to empower youth. Statewide Conference on Youth and Service Philanthropy, the MYPAC will work with the Council of Michigan Foundation state conference. Sam also mention that the Points of Light Foundation would sponsor the YES Ambassador program for another year. We are also doing a MYPAC retreat November 5-7, 1993 to work on Subtitle E grant. • TitleD- Kyle Caldwell Michigan CARES Planning grant to begin to set up models in communities to create, maintain and facilitate community service models. Bringing together members of community to discuss and plan CARES program. Will try to start three models. Will be resubmitting to get funding to start up implementation process. Have developed an RFP for an evaluation. Pamphlet enclosed in packet describing the CARES program. Michigan is one of eight 5 �Ti tie D to be funded. CARES program will help communities build infrastructures in their communities to help address social issues. • Michigan Campaign for Volunteerism Governor Romney gave an update on the Michigan Campaign on Volunteerism. The public service campaign is moving well. Hundreds of people have begun to volunteer. There is continued interest in developing Volunteer Centers in cities that at the present time do not have centers. Citizens are just waiting to be asked to help and to volunteer. The Michigan Campaign on Volunteerism can be an asset to the Commission as it seeks funds from the Corporation for National and Community Service. X. Recommendations of the Executive Commjttee • MCSC Legislation - Chairperson Engler reported that she has contacted the four leaders in the Senate and House regarding a luncheon meeting to be held in December. This legislation will codify the Commission. A draft of the legislation should be finished by late November. Commissioner Pruitt and Chairperson Engler will be attending this meeting. Commissioners that will be interested in attending should call the Commission. • Performance Review of Executive Director - Commissioner Pruitt reported that there should be an evaluation conducted on the Executive Director. This would help give Diana feedback on the work undertaken to date. Commissioner Pruitt will get a draft copy of an evaluation to the Commission before the next meeting. Commissioner Pruitt made a motion to have the other Commissioner buy into the evaluation idea for the Executive Director and Commissioner Drake seconded the motion. Discussion took place on suggested meeting dates. It was explained that the dates have been chosen because of the timelines of the new Corporation. It was suggested that the January meeting be the same day as the Recognition Awards Program. Commissioner Blyth suggested April 7th might not be a good date because of spring breaks. No other comments were made on other dates proposed. 6 �XI. Public Comment Commissioner Brandell shared with the Commission some of the fine work being done by the CMU grantees . They have developed two publications in the area of K-12 service learning . Commissioner Langston suggested that the Commission write a letter of thanks to Darin Day for all his work with the Commission during his year as YES Ambassador. XI I. Other Items Commissioner Langston made a motion to adjourn the meeting and Commission Brandell seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 1:10 p.m. The next Commission meeting will be January 27, 1994 at the Olds Plaza Building in Lansing. 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Minutes Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting minutes Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting minutes. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49586 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/10b0e0e4430a0742c6e847713a082e15.pdf a61633849b8b6e1deaf47d8c8b68449e PDF Text Text . -- Agenda Item Ilia Corporation for National and Community Service Seasons of Service AMERICORPS Learn & Serve America National Senior Volunteer Corps CM - 1 " �Corporation for National and Community Service Seasons of Service AMERICORPS • • • • Grant Program VISTA NCCC Summer of Safety Learn & Serve America National Senior Volunteer Corps • K-12 • Higher Education • • • RSVP Foster Grandparents Senior Companions CM -2 �II Corporation for National and Community Service National Priorities Education • School Readiness • School Success Human Needs • Health •Home Public Safety • Crime Prevention • Crime Control Environment • Neighborhood • Natural CM -5 �./ Corporation for National and Community Service All AmeriCorps Programs Will: 1. "Get Things Done" through direct and demonstrable . servtce 2. Strengthen Communities and affect lasting, constructive change 3. Develop leadership and skills, promote citizenship, and enhance educational opportunity 4. Participate in common activities and comply with national program requirements to ensure quality AC 3 �j Corporation for National and Community Service Types of Available AmeriCorps Grants Planning Operating . Educational Awards Only Training, T A, and other AC · l 1 �I Corporation for National and Community Service Distribution of Funds • Total Available $155.5 m • State Formula Allotment (33°/o) $ 51.8 m • State Competition (33°/c)) $ 51.8 m • Indian Tribes (1 °/o) $ 1.55 m • U.S ; Territories (1 °/c)) $ 1.55 m • National Direct Co111petition $48.8 m AC - 16 �J Corporation for National and Community Service - - - - - - -- - -- State Formula Allotment • $51.8 million and 3,750 educational awards • Not a n en t i tIe n1 en t • Must submit quality application and approved State plan • Correspondint; l·ducational awards as floor, not ceiling- may coanpete for more • Intent to apply by Feb. 1, 1994 • Applications due June15, 1994 • May support programs operated by any eligible applicant • Progra1ns n1ay address State or national priorities 1\1 . 1 7 �j Corporation for National and Community Service State Competition • Must receive formula allotment • Same application due on June 15, 1994 • May support programs operated by any eligible applicant • Number of programs: at least 3 + 1 for each full 0 /o point of national population • Priorities for funding: - Small states: $276,000 and 20 educational awards - National issue priorities - Existing grantees AC 18 �Corporation for National and Community Service Other Program Requirements: 1. Guidelines for participants: • Participant selection: -local participant selection -State and national referral system • Terms of service: -Full-time=1700 hours/9 mos to 1 yr -Part-time= 900 hours/2-3 years (Continued next slide) AC -25 �Corporation for National and Community Service Other Program Requirements: 1. Guidelines for participants (continued): • Participant benefits: -Living allowance=$7,440 -Health care -Child care (if needed) -Reasonable accommodation (if needed) -Educational Awards • Full-time=$4,725 • Part-time=$2,363 AC -26 �Corporation for National and Community Service Other Program Requirements: 1. Guidelines for participants 2. Monitoring and Evaluation -+ 3. Budget Requirements • Matching requirements -Operating Cost=25°/o -Living Allowance=l5°/o -Health Care=15o/o • Limitation on use of funds -5°/o cap on administrative costs -10°/o cap on equipment AC-28 �I Corporation for National and Community Service State Commissions (Including Alternative Administrative Entities & Transitional Entities) • Leadership • Focal point for state and local community service activities • Partnership with the Corporation MK-SC1 �/ Corporation for National and Community Service State Commissions • Primary responsibilities: - State Comprehensive Plan - AmeriCorps Pre-Award - Outreach/Proposal assistance - Competition - IJre-selection - submission to Corporation · Post-Award Technical assistance to programs - Quality assurance - Oversight/management MK-SC2 �/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------~ Corporation for National and Community Service State Commissions • Interaction with other Corp~ration Programs • Learn and Serve America State Education Agency school-based program Solicit and pre-select community-based Learn and Serve America programs • National service direct applicants • Higher Education Innovative Projects - Application copies MK-SC3 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_CNCS-Update Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting National Community Service update Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting National Community Service update. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49580 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/72201bd7855ecb66efc4f248940e25ac.pdf 6c90a0a0cb0a765b16e09f031258df6a PDF Text Text STATE OF MICHIGAN Chairperson Michelle Engler Executive Director Diana Rodrigu ez Algra JOHN ENGLER, Governor DEPARTMENT OF LABOR MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION 111 S. CAPITOL AVENUE OLDS PLAZA, 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 30015 LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 TEL. (517) 335-4295 LOWELL W. PERRY, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Michigan Community Service Commissioners ... FROM: Diana Algra, Executive Director Michigan Community Service Commission RE: Update DATE: January 14, 1994 Enclosed please find the materials for the next Commission meeting which will be held on Thursday, January 27, 1994 from 1;00 p.m. till4;00 p.m. at the Olds Plaza Building, 2nd Floor, Lansing. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting and extend my continued thanks to you for the support you give the Commission and its work. Enclosures � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Next-Meeting-Letter Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting next meeting letter Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting next meeting letter. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49587 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/98d0fde6bc03d7fd58dcdc2cd891950d.pdf 07042c65455707888c5c4659684b1541 PDF Text Text Agenda Item V a MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION OPERATING PROCEDURES NAME & LOCATION 1. The name of the Commission is: "Michigan Community Service Commission" (MCSC). The Commission was created by Executive Order #1991-25 and placed within the State of Michigan Department of Labor. 2. 3. PURPOSE A The MCSC is committed to supporting community service activities statewide and promoting the ethic of civic responsibility. B. Our commiss ion and office encourages the effective coord inati on and channeling of voluntary and community service activities in order to improve the quality of life for the citizens of Michigan. MISSION The miss ion of th e MCSC is to encourage community service/volunteerism as a means of community/state problem so lving and to promote and support vo luntary involvement in government and private programs throughout the state. 4. GOALS 1. Encourage and enable persons from all walks of life and from all age groups to perform constructive volunteer services ; 2. Promote communication and collaboration between public , private, and non profit volunteer programs in the State , and between th e State and the private sector's initiati ves in meeting human, educational , environmental needs; 1 �.... 3. Collect, maintain and share information on private initiatives, community partnerships and creative solutions undertaken by businesses, foundations, voluntary organizations, religious institutions and other private sector groups in the State, in order to promote their broader use; 4. Provide, or arrange for the provision of, training and technical assistance to public and private organizations engaged in volunteer recruitment and programming; 5. Develop, implement and maintain a state plan for public recognition and support of individual volunteer efforts and successful or promising private sector initiatives and public/private partnerships which address community needs; 6. Serve as the state 's liaison to the Commission on National and Community Service and to other appropriate national and state organizations which relate to the Commission mission ; 7. Facilitate the publishing of material concerning the fie ld of community service/volunteerism, and distributing this information broadly; 8. Review the laws and rules of the state of Michigan , and proposed changes therein, to determine their impact on the success of volunteer activities and programs , and recommend such changes as seem appropriate to ensure the achievement of the goals of the Commission. The Commission will seek to collaborate with all appropriate individuals, agencies , and organizations in meeting each goal. 5. MEMBERSHIP The Governor shall appoint a 21 member commission. Term of appointment shall be 3 years, except that of those initially appointed , 7 members shall be appointed for 1 year terms ending October 1, 1992, 7 members appointed for 2 year terms ending October 1, 1993, and 7 members appointed for 3 year terms ending October 1, 1994. The Chairperson of the Commission shall be appointed by the Governor. Any vacancy among the members of the Commission shall be filled by the Governor for the balance of the unexpired term. Absence by a Commission member from either 3 consecutive meetings or any 4 out of twelve meetings shall constitute an executed resignation from the Commission by that member. 2 �6. COMMISSION STAFF The Commission staff shall be composed of an Executive Director and other staff as required to carry out its mandates. The Executive Director of the Commission shall report directly to the Governor and to the Commission. 7. DUTIES OF OFFICERS The Commission Chairperson shall preside at all meetings of the Commission. The Commission Chairperson shall delegate such duties and responsibilities to the Vice-Chairperson as the Chairperson deems necessary to carry out the function of the Commission. The Commission Vice-Chairperson shall , in the absence of the Commission Chairperson, perform the duties of the Commission Chairperson. 8. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Chairperson , in consultation with the Vice-Chairperson , shall appoint 5 members of the Commission to serve on th e Executive Committee . The Executive Committee shall consist of th e Chairperson , and ViceChairperson of th e Commission and five (5) Commission members appointed by the Chairperson . The Executive Committee will function as a facilitating committee to assist the Chairperson , as necessary , in carrying out the mission of the Comm ission. 9. STANDING COMMITTEES The following standing committees shall be established to assist the commission in carrying out their duties and responsibilities: a. b. c. d. e. Youth Body Evaluation Recognition Community Collaboration Fund Development 3 �.' . 10. MEETINGS OF THE COMMISSION The full Commission will meet as needed to carry out its mandate with a minimum of 4 meetings per year. A Commission meeting is in session when at least a quorum of the membership is assembled for that purpose. A quorum shall be a simple majority of the Commission serving. 11. REPORTING REQUIREMENT On an annual basis the Commission will prepare a report to the Governor which describes its activities during the preceding year and makes recommendations to the Governor. Annual reports shall be developed and approved by the Commission then submitted no later than 60 days after the close of each fiscal year. 4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Operating-Procedures Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting operating procedures Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting operating procedures. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49588 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e3905861a28ee0389f039b98477e7c95.pdf 6d52ae2c9f7c7cfba7867c44c84eea63 PDF Text Text Agenda Item V(c ) Partners in Service Partners in Service is the mentoring program which links members of the Michigan Community Service Commission with members of the Michigan Youth Progressive Action Council (MYPAC), a standing committee of the Commission. Both Commissioners and MYPAC members stand to gain a great deal from this kind of relationship. Commissioners will gain access to the valuable viewpoints and perspectives of a young person. In turn, MYPAC members will benefit from the wealth of knowledge and experience each Commissioner can offer. Through communication and cooperation the quality of input from the MYPAC will increase and the work of Commission as a whole will be enhanced. The staff of the Commission have paired each MYPAC member with a Commissioner from the same geographic area. Our hope is that Commissioners involved with Partners in Service will invite their MYPAC partners to travel to Commission meetings with them. Further, we strongly encourage each partner to meet and speak on the telephone frequently, as well as visit each others' programs. The focus of the Panners in Service relationship should be on discussing the work of the Commission and the role of the MYPAC in supporting it and pushing it forward. As in all effective mentoring relationships, each partner in a Partners in Service relationship should be a teacher and a learner. As partners, the Michigan Community Service Commission and the Michigan Youth Progressive Action Council are poised to do a lot of good things in Michigan. Amy Marie Ahola Houghton, MI Randy Neelis Escanaba, MI Michael Almassian Grand Rapids, MI Beverly Drake Grand Rapids, MI Mary Beth Brockmeier Kalamazoo, MI Dorothy Johnson Grand Haven, MI Aaron Cunningham Flint, MI Henry Gaines Flint, MI Gwen Downs Alma,MI Vernie Nethercut, Alpena, MI Mary Ellen Brandell, Mt. Pleasant, MI Jenna Goldenberg West Bloomfield, MI Judith Dunn Farmington Hills, MI TeddyKang Ann Arbor, MI Sister Martinez Livonia, MI Anne Jeannette LaSovage East Lansing, MI Mike Tate East Lansing, MI Marisela Martinez Ann Arbor, MI Lisa Illitch Murray Detroit, MI Jarrod Montague Linden, MI Terry Pruitt Saginaw, MI �Jason Openo Albion, MI Joel Orosz Battle Creek, MI Elizabeth Schiamberg Okemos,MI Michelle Engler Lansing, MI Lashane Woodcox Lansing, MI Terry Langston East Lansing, MI Tim Jacobs Bay City, MI Jon Blyth Flint, MI �Michigan Youth Progressive Action Council Tim Jacobs 148 Little Killarney Beach Bay City, MI 48706 (517) 686-3782 Amy Marie Ahola Rte. 1 Box 174 Houghton, MI 49931 (906) 482-7215 Marisela Martinez University of Michigan Bursley-Bartlett, Rm 6256 1931 Duffield Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (313) 763-2693 Michael Almassian 2134 Innwood SE Grand Rapids, MI 49508 (616) 455-5619 LaShane Woodcox 3629 Lochmoor Dr. Lansing, MI 48911 (517) 887-2195 Elizabeth Schiamberg 3596 W. Arbutus Okemos, MI 48864 (517) 349-4747 Gwen L. Downs 316 S. Bruske Alma, MI 48801 (517) 463-7648 Mary Beth Brockmeier 933 South Shore Drive Holland, MI 49423 (616) 335-8044 Jason Openo Delta Tau Delta Albion College Albion, MI 49224 (517) 629-1932 Sarah Riley 1224 South Drive Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 (517) 773-2509 Aaron Demetrius Cunningham 6213 Covered Wagons Trail Flint, MI 48532 (313) 230-9488 Anne Jeannette LaSovage 219 East Holmes Hall Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48825 (517) 353-7472 Jenna M. Goldenberg 6729 Candlewood Trail West Bloomfield, MI 48322 (313) 851-7915 TeddyKang 2370 Lancashire Dr., #1B Ann Arbor, MI 48105 (313) 761-8778 Jarrod Montague 15108 Restwood Drive Linden, MI 48451 (313) 735-4748 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Partners-in-Service Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting Partners in Service Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting Partners in Service. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49589 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/26d074746d4d212db7d33de7324b36f5.pdf c75a9bc8bb912ccbca4ab977f573cd6d PDF Text Text Agenda Item V(e ) MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION Mrs. Michelle Engler, Chair Ms. Julie F. Cummings Michigan Community Service Commission Olds Plaza Building, 4th Floor 111 S. Capitol Avenue P.O. Box 30015 Lansing, Michigan 48909 6380 Muirfield Ct. Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48301 (W)313-871-8000 Expiration Date: 10-2-95 Fax: 313-871-5634 Mrs. Diana Algra, Ex. Director Ms. Beverly Drake Michigan Community Service Commission Olds Plaza Building, 4th Floor 111 S. Capitol Avenue P.O. Box 30015 Lansing, Michigan 48909 ACSET 144 E. Fulton St. Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (W)616-336-4120 *SDA Director Expiration Date: 10-2-96 (W) 517-335-4295 Fax: 616-336-4118 Mr. Victor Begg Mr. Henry C. Gaines 1264 Club Drive Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 4107 Green brook Ln. Flint, Michigan 48507 (H)313-338-4180 (W)313-334-9225 *President, Muslim American Alliance Expiration Date: 10-2-95 (W) 313-238-1616 Ext 39 *Local559 UAW Expiration Date: 10-2-95 Fax: 313-238-3378 Mr. Jon Blyth Mr. Paul Hubbard 1200 Mott Foundation Building Flint, Michigan 48502 New Detroit, Inc. 719 Griswold St., Ste. 1000 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (W) 313-238-5651 *Mott Foundation Expiration Date: 10-2-95 Fax:313-238-8482 (W) 313-496-2055 *New Detroit President Expiration Date: 10-2-94 Dr. Mary Ellen Branden Fax: 313-496-2071 619 E. Chippewa Street Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858-1741 (W) 517-77 4-6448 *Central Michigan University Expiration Date: 10-2-94 Fax: 517-774-2481 1 �Ms. Dorothy Johnson Mr. Randy Neelis Council of Michigan Foundation 1 South Harbor A venue, Ste. 3 P.O. Box 599 Grand Haven, Michigan 49417 Menominee School District 4701 Fifth St. Menominee, Michigan 49858 (W) 906-863-9951 *Supt of Menominee School District Expiration Date: 10-2-95 (W) 616-842-7080 *Council of Michigan Foundation Expiration Date: 10-2-94 Fax:906-863-1171 Fax: 616-842-1760 Ms. Vernie Nethercut Mr. Terry Langston 1139 Washington Alpena, Michigan 49707 114 Mason Lane Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48825 (W) 517-356-9021 ext. 271 *Alpena Community College Expiration Date: 10-2-96 (W) 517-353-5038 *MSU Student Expiration Date: 10-2-95 Fax:517-356-6334 Sister Mary Martinez Dr. Joel Orosz Madonna College 36600 Schoolcraft Livonia, Michigan 48150 W. K. Kellogg Foundation One Michigan A venue East Battle Creek, Michigan 49017 (W)313-591-5170 *Madonna University Expiration Date: 10-2-1996 (W)616-968-1611 *W.K. Kellogg Foundation Expiration Date: 10-2-94 Fax: 313-591-0156 Fax: 616-968-0413 Ms. Lisa Ditch Murray Mr. Terry Pruitt, Jr. Fox Office Center 2211 Woodward Detroit, Michigan 48201-3400 1469 Allendale Drive Saginaw, Michigan 48630 (W) 517-496-8302 *Trustee-Saginaw Area Comm. Foundation Expiration Date: 10-2-96 (W)313-983-6420 *Little Caesar Enterprise Expiration Date: 10-2-94 Fax: 517-496-4586 Fax: 313-983-6494 Ms. Judith Dunn 24404 Catherine Industrial Rd.,Ste. 308 Novi, Michigan 48375 (W) 313-344-6644 *Decanter Imports Expiration Date: 10-2-96 Fax: 313-344-8857 2 �... .... Ms. Sarah M. Riley 1224 South Drive Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858 (H)517-773-2509 *High School Student Expiration Date: 10-2-95 Michael J, Tate Asst Director of Extension Governmental Relations, MSU 108 AgHall East Lansing, MI 48824 (W) 355-2361 *State 4-H Director Expiration Date: 10-2-96 Fax: Ms. Geneva Jones Williams United Community Services of Metro Detroit 1212 Griswold Detroit, Michigan 48226-1899 (W) 313-226-9444 *United Community Services Expiration Date: 10-2-96 Fax: 313-226-9388 3 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Roster Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting roster Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting roster. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49590 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/807febc5bed2c1415c3492431b6dcbcd.pdf 04f626c981bc66407fcb99a89d34daa1 PDF Text Text Agenda Item V b MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION STANDING COMMITTEES Executive· this committee will function as a facilitating committee to assist the Chairperson, as necessary, in carrying out the mission of the Commission. It will be composed of the Chairperson, Vice Chair and five (5) Commission members appointed by the Chair. Community Collaboration (Michigan CARES ) • this committee will seek to promote communication and collaboration between public and private volunteer programs in the state, and between the State and the private sector's initiative's in meeting community needs. MYPAC (Michigan Youth Progressive Action Council) ·this committee will provide youth with more voice on Commission matters. The committee will be composed of young people and Commissioners between the ages of 12-21 and will assist the Commission in the development of its youth service policy and advise and guide the Commission in regard to youth issues. Evaluation· this committee will outline an agenda that addresses the evaluation needs of each subtitle under the National and Community Service Act funded and other initiatives of the Commission. The evaluation scheme will focus OI). participants, the community and the Commission. This Committee will work closely with the Commission on National and Community Service on evaluation. Recognition· this committee will develop a multi-tier recognition/awards program. The first tier will come from the state Commission and be made available to all who service in organized youth and community service programs. The second tier award will be a Governor's award for exemplary service. The Committee will also work with local communities to develop and coordinate their own awards programs. Fund Development · this committee will assist with developing a strategy for increasing resources in the field of community service initiatives at both the state and local levels. �MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION STANDING COMMITTEES Community Collaboration Committee Community Collaboration - this committee will seek to promote communication and collaboration between public and private volunteer programs in the state, and between the State and the private sector's initiative's in meeting community needs. Members of Commission Members at Lar~e Vernie Nethercut- VAC and CC Randy Neelis - School Superintendent Mike Tate - 4H Extension Kathy Agard - Foundation Dave Egner- MI Non-Profit Forum Cyndi Mark - 4H Gene Keilitz- United Way ofMI John Weiss- Graduate Student UofM Evaluation Committee Evaluation - this committee will outline an agenda that addresses the evaluation needs of each subtitle under the National and Community Service Act funded and other initiatives of the Commission. The evaluation scheme will focus on participants, the community and the Commission. This Committee will work closely with the Commission on National and Community Service on evaluation. Members at Lan~e Members of Commission Mary Ellen Brandell - Higher Ed Terry Pruitt- Comm. Found. & Lg. Business Jon Blyth - National Foundation Fund Development Committee Fund Development - this committee will assist with developing a strategy for increasing resources in the field of community service initiatives at both the state and local levels. Members of Commission Michelle Engler - Chair Geneva Williams- Non-Profit Organization Henry Gaines - Labor Joel Orosz- National Foundation Members of Lar~ �Recognition Program Committee Recognition - this committee will develop a multi-tier recognition/awards program. The first tier will come from the state Commission and be made available to all who service in organized youth and community service programs. The second tier award will be a Governor's award for exemplary service. The Committee will also work with local communities to develop and coordinate their own awards programs. Members of Commission Members of Lan~e Michelle Engler - Chair Julie Cummings- Fund Development Lisa Ditch Murray - Large Corporation Judy Reyes- Higher Education Judy Rapanos- Comm. Leader Darryl White - VAC Director Barbara Bradford - DSS-Volunteer Coordinator Youth Body Committee Youth Body on Community Service- this committee will provide youth with more voice on Commission matters. The committee will be composed of young people and Commissioners between the ages of 12-21 and will assist the Commission in the development of its youth service policy and advise and guide the Commission in regard to youth issues. Members of Commission Terry Langston - MSU Student Sarah Riley- High School Student Executive Committee Executive Committee- this committee will assist the Chairperson, as necessary, in carrying out the mission of the Commission. Members of Commission Michelle Engler - Chair Terry Pruitt - Vice Chair Mike Tate Terry Langston Jon Blyth Beverly Drake Dottie Johnson � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Standing-Committees Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting standing committees Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting standing committees. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49592 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/70e641da829bc27886bd9f9f0f7e01ae.pdf 54c8cbffb80921d450ad73900f6c5ab0 PDF Text Text Agenda Item I V b STATE OF MICHIGAN tiE: Chairperson Michelle Engler Executive Director Diana Rodriguez Algra JOHN ENGLER , Governor DEPARTMENT OF LABOR MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION 111 S. CAP ITOL AVENUE OLDS PLAZA. 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 30015 LANSI NG MI CHIGAN 48909 TEL. (517) 335-4295 LO WELL W. PERRY, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Rothwell, CEO Doug Stites, Vice President Office of Workforce Development Michigan Jobs Commission FROM: Diana Algra, Executive Director Michigan Community Service Commission RE: State Focus Groups Teleconference DATE: January 18, 1994 In an effort to develop a new three year state plan as it relates to the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993, it will be necessary for us to establish a method or mechanism to seek citizen input I've attached page 23 from the Americorps Program State Application which states that at least 25% of a state " Quality" will be based on citizen input. After careful discussion with both the steering committee and the Executive Committee of the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) it was suggested and concurred that we consider the use of video conferencing to accomplish this. Due to deadline constraints the teleconference would have to take place from 6:30p.m. till 8:30p.m. on Wednesday, February 23, 1994. We have selected 15 communities throughout the state for our downlink. Each community would have two-three community sponsors and a trained facilitator to obtain local input. We would produce a 1/2 hour teleconference moderated with the following panel members, Diana · Algra, Executive Director of MCSC , Michelle Engler, First Lady and Chairperson of MCSC, Stan Stewart, State Director of ACTION and Interim Corporation Representative and a moderator. In addition, we would also be requesting members of the Commission in these communities to attend local focus groups. With Executive Committee concurrence we contacted 4-H Extension to assist us with this process. Attached you find a brief proposal of cost associated with this project. Please note that this expenditure would come out of our administrative grant from the Corporation. Our Executive committee is of the opinion that this expenditure is both worthwhile and cost effective considering our staff size, pressing deadlines and Michigan weather. I would like to request your review and concurrence with this as soon as possible. �E. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF STATE PL\:\i Quality of State Plan ( ;"3 ., ,, ). Tne qua lity o t the Srate p lans •vtll je e,·a luared. c a~ed on the follo-;,:mg criteria: • The det.·e!opment and quality or reaiistic goals and ob jectit.·es ror monng sc:rn ce ahead in the State; • The extent to which proposed strategies can reasonably be expected to accomplish stated goals; and • The extent oi input in the development of the State plan from a broad cross-section of individuals and organizations including communitybased agencies; organizations with a demonstrated record of providing educationaL public safety, human, or environmental services; residents or the State, including youth and other prospective participants; State Education .4-.gencies; traditional service organizations; and labor unwns. ·~ Sustainability (25%). The Corporation will consider sustainability based on: the plan is supported, to a significant extent, by the State through financ iaL inkind and bi-partisan political support, including the existence of supportive legislation; and the plan is supported, to a significant extent, by non-State support through financial, in-kind and other support of the local government. and private sector, foundations, and other entities and I or individuals 1 :3 :13 P\<f January lO.l994 �Geographic Distribution of 1992-1994 CNCS Grantees in Michigan and Location of Focus Groups Tr•ene Legend ~ WuJotd • • SERVE MICHIGAN- K-12 • Generation Grant-Higher Education .,. State & Local Youth Service Corps &~ Focus Group Site Region f:~~:~ • Focus Group Sites ·Marquette • Sault Ste. Marie ·Gaylord ·Muskegon • Benton Harbor ·Kalamazoo • Flint • Saginaw • Detroit- 3 ·Lansing ·Mount Pleasant • Ypsilanti/ Ann Arbor • Grand Rapids • Midland 4 .,. • ~---+----~-·--~,~· ~ • 3 .,.• • • Ionia • E3lon Sany • • 2 ~ .,. • Branch • • 2 ~ > •• • ~ • 5 J.....,., • • 2 Uvingotcn - • • • ~ • 2 • 2 2 7 . •. ~~ • 3 �'0' :) .!. :- .; .) .; i\ lfiCHlGAN t) ~ ..;; .; S1~TE L. \i iV ERS I t Y EXTENSION December 21 , 1993 Diana Rodriguez Algra, Exec:..Jt:ive Dire~or Michigan Community Se!Vics Commission Dear Diana, Attached is the oUtline of the prcjeC: that Michigan ~~te University Extension (MSUE), 4-H Youu~ Programs is sutmitting to the Michigan Community Servica Ccmmissior.. Tnis paperwork includes an indication ot the partnership that would be fcrmed with tile MSUE, Children, Youth and Family, 4-H Youth Programs anc 'die Ccmmissicn as wei! Q an explanaticn and breakdown of costs related to the statewide satellite videcconference. Diana, when we disc~ssed this prcjec: with our 4·H t:cakkeeper, she indicated we have an agreement with ·he university that makes it feasit:le far us to work with a pun:has€ crder sysrem for payment versL!s soing through the Michi~an State Univers ity Offics of Comrac"'..s and Grants. This eliminates the overhead charge d the university and ether deiays '"har ccc!d oc:::...:r. Ones the Michigan C.:mmur.ity Servics Ccmmissicn r-.as agreed :o the project, and the Michigan 4-H YoLth Prcgrc.ms recsives a purchase order from ycu, :Me ~rcjec: czn be up anc r'-1r.ning . ~-H YOUTH PROGRAMS .:.:..Ooerativf! E.:1enstan SerJite In addition, payment to Fwi:ure Media fer faciiity, c:-ew and satellite costs wodd te bH!ec ~o the Michigan C:Jmmur.itv' Service Ccmmissicn. P..cain a ;:urchase orcer would t: e neeced .c:-icr to their ~~arting set-'Jp ar.d pr::::duction ct the videoconferer.cs. :i ~ 3~rxev _,~ II :;:t _jrr.-;m ~J. ~i r.n 1 a: ~sa z.v iii : j i/~== ··i i80 ; ; x· : : 71~5 5 - ~i'-18 Ones ycu have read thrcugh tt":is ~rcjec: cut!ine, fee! free to c::ntc.C! either cne cf us. We wiil be avaiiat: ie arter January 4 at ·r.e State 4- ~ Offics. Tne te ! e~hcne nL.;mt;er is 35~ -()1 80. We look forward •o having the oppcrrunity to work mere closely with the Michigan Community Servics Commissicn. Sincsrely, / 'l !: .":·aJn .:.·.:;:! ·_·:.: •.-!! !.l i'l ~:O'Jt~;n~~ .;,"'C -=.rr!~!:=.·: -:~.-~[.'~IS . :."?. ·.J.:ZJ< :~ 'lfi~fi:'giJ./1 ::.'!1!~ •.Jn; . ::·s::~: J ~;. _~:-;JJi.";~.o-:' .:.• :.cr:~'.:::::;e HSU s .;.1 ;:.'irr:·:;1/r.t.··~t.::. c.'1 :~ !!:JJ · ·:c:cr":_•:•!tv n.t"tJ: iJ;, i,;'t t 4 // a~-77~ Cinthia B. Mark. Ph.D. Program Lsader 4-H Yow1h P;q;rams ~dfiU{y;fU1<.:.-'-ren L Paca Assoc:ate Prcgram Leacer 4-H Youth Programs �MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILY PROGRAMS BACKGROUND The 4-H Youth Programs of Michigan State University's Extension Children, Youth and Family Programs works with faculty and staff on and off campus, as well as with other partners, to address the concerns of Michigan citizens. A recent statewide issues identification process identified a need for more emphasis and programming in the areas of children, youths and families. The mission of the Children, Youth and Family Programs (CYF) is to educate within communities to enhance the quality of life across the life cycle. The organization's values are learning, lifelong education, research-based quality programming and diversity. Michigan 4-H Youth Programs is interested in partnering with the Michigan Community Service Commission because both organizations share the goal of strengthening Michigan's children; youths and families. Community service activities conducted throughout the state become one vehicle to make that happen. The Extension CYF Program has a staff experienced in working collaboratively with public and private agencies, educating and facilitating in communities and in producing print and video-based learning tools. �THE MICHIGAN COMMUNI1Y SERVICE CO:MMISSION STATEWIDE SATELLITE VIDEOCONFERENCE PRODUCED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILY PROGRAMS 4-H YOUTH PROGRAMS MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The following budget estimate is for the production of a 1-hour, live, telephone interactive, satellite videoconference and wrap-around for 15 locally facilitated downlink sites across Michigan on the evening of Wednesday, February 23, 1993. The budget includes: Program Design, Coordination and Production: $U,800 Michigan State University Extension Childre~ Youth and Family Programs will work with MCSC to design the satellite program and local wrap-around at 15 sites in Michigan. This support includes the expertise and services of Cynthia Mark, Ph.D., program leader and Karen Pace, associate program leader. This item also includes local site selection and coordination by on- and off-campus Extension staff members, satellite transponder fees, telephone and face-to-face facilitator training, graphic design for camera-ready marketing/recruitment materials, clerical support, travel, materials, supplies and bookkeeping. Facility, Crew, Satellite Estimated Costs: $U,800* The satellite uplink will be produced at Future Media, a full-service television production facility in Okemos. All production costs including studio, crew, teleprompter, set design and installatio~ music, graphics, tape stock, phone service for call-ins and satellite uplink truck will be paid by MCSC directly to Future Media on receipt of invoices after services are provided. TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE: *Facility, crew and satellite costs are an estimate. production elements. $25.600** Costs vary based on complexity of **Does not include: pre-produced video roll-in segments, editing and distribution of final taped program, site charges that may be incurred at non-MSU Extension downlink sites, local site materials, refreshments, etc., advertising and mass-mailing costs. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_State-Focus-Groups-Teleconference Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting state focus groups teleconference Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting state focus groups teleconference. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49593 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d2c027cce815cdb104c69da7fa83e189.pdf 7946a66303fb391a3fc137c71d451208 PDF Text Text Agenda Item II Ib State of Michigan National and Community Service Deadlines State Administrative Grant due to Corporation February 1, 1994 Statewide Community Forum Teleconference February 23, 1994 *Summer of Safety Regulations due from Corporation Late January-early February 1994 Technical Assistance Session on Americorps State RFP (Lansing and Detroit) March 1 & 2, 1994 Technical Assistance Session on Serve and Learn America/CBO's (Lansing) March 8, 1994 Summer of Safety Application due to Corporation March 15, 1994 *Learn and Serve America: School Based Programs due to Corporation April 1, 1994 * Learn and Serve America: Higher Education due to Corporation April 9, 1994 *Americorps, National Service Direct due to Corporation April 15, 1994 Americorps, National Service State Level RFP due to Michigan Community Service Commission April 15, 1994 Learn and Serve America State Level Community Based Program RFP due to Michigan Community Service Commission April 15, 1994 Final Michigan Community Service Commission Approval of Americorps grantees and Learn and Service America CBO grantees May 20, 1994 Learn & Serve America CBO - State Commission application due to Corporation May 27, 1994 Americorps National Service State Application to Corporation June 15, 1994 *These applicants to the Corporation will have to inform State Commission of their application to Corporation and submit copies of such to State Commission. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_SOM-Natl-and-Comm-Serv-Deadlines Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting State of Michigan National and Community Service Deadlines Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting State of Michigan National and Community Service Deadlines. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49591 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/0934f33f4c567e6e5d239d41ff6d765b.pdf 2adb9c20c06431d49e5ba5e47852d84f PDF Text Text Agenda Item IIIf State agencies (proposed); Michigan community service commission; ,/") _codify. STATE AGENCIES (PROPOSED): ~~~~~ A bill to establish the Michigan community service commission; to provide for the powers and duties of tbe Michigan community service commission; and to provide for the powers and duties of state departments and agencies and certain state officers and employees. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT: Sec. 1. 2 As used in this act: (a) "Commission" means the Michigan community service com- 3 mission established in section 2. 4 (b) "Title I" means title I of the national and community 5 service act of 1990, Public Law 101-610. 6 Sec. 2. The Michigan community service commission is estab- 7 lished within the Michigan jobs commission, established by 8 Executive Order No. 04361 '93 * 1993-2. TMV �2 Sec. 3. ( 1 ) The commission shall consist of 25 members 2 appointed by the governor. 3 (2) The commission shall include all of the following: 4 (a) An individual with expertise in the educational, train- S ing, and developmental needs of youth, particularly disadvantaged 6 youth. 7 (b) An individual with experience in promoting service and 8 volunteerism among older adults. 9 10 11 12 (c) A representative of community-based agencies or community-based organizations. (d) The superintendent of public instruction, or his or her designee. 13 (e) A representative of local government. 14 (f) A representative of local labor organizations. 15 (g) A representative of business. 16 (h) An individual between the ages of 16 and 25 who is a 17 18 19 participant or supervisor in a volunteer or service program. (i) A representative of the corporation for national and community service described in section 122(a) of part I of subti- 20 tle C of title I, 42 U.S.C. 12572, as a nonvoting, ex officio 21 22 member. (3) In addition to the members described in subsection (2), 23 the commission may include, but is not limited to, any of the 24 following: 25 -(a) Local educators. 26 (b) Experts in the delivery of human, educational, 27 environmental, or public safety services. 04361 93 I * �3 -(c) Representatives of Native American tribes. 2 (d) Out-of-school youth or other at-risk youth. 3 (e) Representatives of entities that receive assistance 4 -under the domestic volunteer service act of 1973, Public Law 5 93-113, 87 Stat. 394. 6 (4) Not more than 6 of the commission members shall be offi- 7 cers or employees of this state. The governor may appoint addi- S tional officers or employees of this state as nonvoting, ex offi9 cia members of the commission. 10 (5) Except as provided in this subsection, members of the 11 commission shall serve for staggered 3-year terms expiring on 12 October 1 or when a successor is appointed, whichever is later. 13 The terms of not less than 8 members shall expire each year. The 14 21 members constituting the Michigan community service commission 15 under ~xecutive Order No. 1991-25 on the day before the effective 16 date of this act shall serve on the commission for the remainder 17 of the terms for which they were appointed. The governor shall 18 appoint 1 additional member for a term expiring October 1 1994, 19 additional member for a term expiring October 1, 1995, and 2 20 additional members for terms expiring October 1, 1996. 21 (6) A vacancy in the office of a member of the commission is 22 created in the manner provided in section 3 of chapter 15 of the 23 Revised Statutes of 1846, being section 201.3 of the Michigan 24 Compiled Laws. A vacancy shall be filled by appointment by the 25 governor for the -remainder of the term. 04361 '93 * �4 Sec. 4. 2 commission. (1) The governor shall appoint a chairperson of the The commission may elect other officers from among 3 its members. 4 --- ( 2) . T.he -commission shall meet quarterly. However, the corn- S mission shall meet more frequently at the call of the chairperson 6 or if requested by 5 or more members. (3) A majority of the members of the commission constitutes 7 8 a quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of the 9 10 commission. req·1ired for official action of the commission. 11 12 A majority of the members present and serving are (4) The business which the commission may perform shall be conducted at a public meeting of the commission held in compli- 13 ance with the open meetings act, Act No. 267 of the Public Acts 14 of 1976, being sections 15.261 to 15.275 of the Michigan Compiled 15 Laws. 16 (5) A .writing prepared, owned, used, in possession of, or 17 retained by the commission in the performance of an official 18 function is subject to the freedom of information act, Act 19 No. 442 of the Public Acts of 1976, being sections 15.231 to 20 15.246 of the Michigan Compiled Laws. 21 (6) Members of the commission shall serve without 22 compensation. However, members of the commission may be reim- 23 bursed for their actual and necessary expenses incurred in the 24 performance of their official duties as members of the 25 commission. 26 Sec. 5. 04361 '93 * The commission shall do all of the following: �5 (at Ensure _that its funding decisions meet all federal and 2 state statutory 3 re~uirements. (b) Recommend innovative statewide service programs to 4 increase volunteer participation in all age groups and 5 community-based problem solving by diverse participants. 6 (c) Develop and implement a centralized system for obtaining 7 information and technical support concerning volunteerism and 8 community service recruitment, projects, training methods, mate9 rials, and activities throughout this state. The commission 10 sLall provide the information and technical support upon 11 request. 12 (d) Promote interagency collaboration to maximize resources 13 and develop a model of such collaboration on the state level. 14 (e) Provide public recognition and support of volunteer 15 efiorts that address community needs by individuals, by private 16 sector organizations and businesses, and by partnerships between 11 the public and private sectors. 18 (f) Stimulate increased community awareness of the effects 19 of volunteer services in this state. 20 (g) Utilize local, state, and federal resources to initiate, 21 strengthen, and expand quality service programs. 22 (h) Serve as this state's representative to national and 23 state organizations that support the commission's mission. 24 (i) Prepare for this state a national 3-year service plan 25 that -- follows state 26 and - ~ederal guidelines. (j) Prepare this state's financial assistance applications 27 under section 1 17b of subpart B of part I of subtitle B of title 04361 '93 * �6 I, 42 2 title I, 42 3 12543, and section 130 of part II of subtitle C of U.S~C. u.s.c. 12582. (k) Assist in the preparation of the department of 4 education's application for financial assistance under 5 section 113 of subpart A of part I of subtitle B of title I, 42 6 7 u.s.c. 12525. (~) Prepare this s t ate's application under section 130 of 8 part II of subtitle C of title I, 42 u.s.c. 12582 for the 9 approval of service positions such as the national service educa- 10 tional award described in svbtitle D of title I , 42 u.s.c. 12601 11 to 12604. 12 (m) Make technical assistance available to enable applicants 13 for assistance under section 12 1 of part I of subtitle C of title 14 I, 42 U.S.C. 12571, to plan and implement service programs; and 15 ·to apply for assistance under the national service laws. 16 (n) Assist in the provision of health care and child care 17 benefits under section 140 of part III of subtitle C of title I, 18 42 U.S.C. 12594, to participants in national service programs 19 that receive assistance under section 121 of part I of subtitle C 20 of title I, 42 21 u.s.c. 12571. (o) Develop a state system for the recruitment and placement 22 of participants in programs that receive assistance under the 23 national service laws. 24 (p) Disseminate information about national service programs 25 that receive assistance under national · service laws and about 26 approved national service positions. 04361 '93 * �7 (q.) Use assistance provided under section 121 of part I of 2 subtitle C of title I, 42 u.s.c. 12571, to administer this 3 state•s grant program in support of national service programs -4 including the - selection, oversight, and evaluation of grant 5 recipients. 6 (r) Establish policies and procedures for the use of federal 7 funds received under title I or the national service laws. 8 (s) Coordinate its functions, including recruitment, public 9 awareness, and training activities, with any division of the cortO poration for national and community services. 11 Sec. 6. The commission shall have staff necessary for the 12 commission to perform its functions. 13 include an executive director. The commission staff shall The executive director shall 14 report directly to the governor and the commission for the pur15 pose of giving advice and making recommendations on programs and 16 laws related to volunteerism and community service. 17 Sec. 7. State departments and agencies shall cooperate with 18 the commission in the performance of its functions. The commis- 19 sion may request, and state departments and agencies shall pro20 vide, policy and technical information required by the commission 21 in the performance of its functions. 04361 1 93 * Final page. TMV � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Statewide-Evaluation-RFP-Draft Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting Statewide Evaluation RFP draft Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting Statewide Evaluation RFP draft. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49594 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/240172c2a04f0e9e6f0822a21c575007.pdf d104056c735680877ae1a4109cbe4a0b PDF Text Text Agenda I tem II Id RFP Bidders The following organizations declined to enter bids: The following organizations entered bids in the appropriate manner and will be considered: FERA 777 Waterman Ann Arbor, MI 48103 313-994-9060 Leonard C. Kercher Center for Social Research 2512 Sangren Hall WMU Kalamazoo, MI 49008 616-387-2967 Spec Associates 30400 Telegraph Rd. Ste. 327 Bingham Farms, MI 48025 313-647-8444 �Review Committee Members Reviewer Reyjewer Number Diana Rodriguez Algra Executive Director Michigan Community Service Commission 01 Jon Blyth Program Officer Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Member of the Michigan Community Service Commission 02 Julie A. Busch Executive Director Michigan Campus Compact 03 Kyle Caldwell Program Director Michigan CARES 04 Vicki Enright/Desta Kearney Deputy Dir. Workforce Development Michigan Jobs Commission 05 Elaine Gordon K-12 Serve Michigan Coordinator Michigan Department of Education 06 Terry Pruitt, Jr. Trustee Saginaw Area Community Foundation Member of the Michigan Community Service Commission 07 Sam Singh YES Ambassador Michigan Community Service Commission 08 Sharon Walenga Office of Purchasing Michigan Department of Management and Budget 09 �Firm Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Reviewer Number: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Michigan Community Service Commission Statewide National and Community Service Evaluation RFP Score Sheet Maximum Points I. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY A. Services (50 points) * Understanding the problem and project objectives 20 * Ability to address the objectives of the RFP and deliver the required product/ services TOTAL..................................................................... B. .2Q Capability & Qualifications (25 points) * Quality/recency of similar projects * Ability to meet time constraints contained intheRFP TOTAL..................................................................... C. 30 15 10 25 Qualified Personnel (25 points) * Experience of personnel on similar projects 15 * Adequacy of education/experience of assigned personnel including project manager 5 * Adequacy of amount and level of personnel assigned to projects TOTAL..................................................................... GRAND TOTAL............................................................... 5 25 .1.00 �I-J SELECTION CRITERIA Responses to this RFP will be evaluated based upon a Two-Step Selection Process. The first step will involve an evaluation of the following factors as presented in the bidder's response to this RFP: A. Step l-Maoa~ment Summary (100 points per evaluator) 1. Services (50) points The written proposal should describe how the bidder intends to address the objectives of the RFP from an operational and management perspective. Additional services beyond those required in the RFP will be given consideration as well. 2. Capability, Qualifications and Experience (25 points) The written proposal should indicate the ability of the contractor to meet the terms of the RFP, especially the time constraints, quality, and recency of projects similar to that described in the RFP. The bidder should describe in this section any experience it has had evaluating youth corps, service learning curriculum and community service initiatives. 3. Qualified Personnel (25 points) The written proposal should indicate the competence of personnel whom the bidder intends to assign to the project. Qualifications will be measured by education and experience, with particular reference to experience on projects similar to that described in the RFP. Emphasis will be placed upon the qualifications of bidder's Project Manager and the Manager's dedicated management time as well as that of other key personnel working on this project Of the total maximum possible score in Step I, a minimum of not less than 90% of the total maximum possible score must be obtained in order for a bidder to be further considered for award under Step II below. B. Step IT-Price Analysis 1. Only those proposals receiving a score of 90% or more of the total maximum possible score in step I will be considered for evaluation in step II. 2. The "bidders' score" will be determined by multiplying the bidder's points awarded in Step I by the ratio of the lowest "qualified" price proposal serving as a constant numerator divided by the bidder's price. �Expressed as a formula, the calculation would be: Lowest Price Proposal Passing Step I X Bidder's Price Points Awarded In Step I = Bidders Score Thereafter, award recommendation, subject to B-3 below, will be made, for that responsive and responsible bidder qualified in Step I and offering the best value to the State as represented by the highest score attained as outlined above, for the goods/services offered; the quality of the commodities/services to be supplied, their conformity with specifications, their suitability to the requirements of the State, and delivery terms being taken in consideration. 3. The State reserves the right to award by item, part or portion of an item, group of items or total proposal, to reject any and all proposals in whole or in part, if, in the MJC's CEO's judgment, the best interest of the State will be so served. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-01-27_Statewide-Evaluation-RFP-Review Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting Statewide Evaluation RFP review Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-01-27 commission meeting Statewide Evaluation RFP review. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49595 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-01-27 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d6d76d08bde52767b4c837b9bdd9f9dc.pdf b9b1ec19fd70f2cbfc326d95d84a45ae PDF Text Text The Winners of the 1993 Community Service Awards Lifetime Achievement John J. Shields Shirlee Whittaker Ruth McCully Andy Pepper Carol Gunberg Innovative Spirit Impact Seminars for Youth, Inc. Volunteers of Lighthouse of Oakland County Kathleen Prell Robert Primley Christina Jose Youth (under 18) MaryBeth Brockmeier Hanna Miller Jamal Edwards Anne Jeannette LaSovage Adult CajW 18-65) Jeanette Morrison-Marks Douglas Thompson Sybellia Barsch Reverend Gerald Beaumont Nancy Flinn Senior (65 and over) Patricia Woods Elizabeth S. Upjohn Sister Agnes Thiel Jim Muir Gertrude Berndt Family Vern and Joan Johnson Milton and Zelda Rose Wayne and Cindy Howard Youth On~anization LaSallian Youth of De La Salle Irwin 'Just say No' Club Youth Volunteer Services Adult Or~anization The Urban Bankers Forum of Flint RSVP of Otsego County SOSAD Project Compassion Inc. United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Corporation/Business Consumers Powers The Upjohn Company Little Caesars Love Kitchen Found. Martha's Vineyard S-L Educator David Mathis Nancy Miller Virginia Fox Robert Simmons Community Service Promm Mana&er Anthony Bauer Marge Hermanson � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_1993-Community-Service-Award-Winners Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting 1993 community service award winners Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting 1993 community service award winners. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49596 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/adfc71599aa9ee15692d7e8f736c99fc.pdf 39bfff411180a1a4a05dcde6dd224f86 PDF Text Text MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION AGENDA March 23, 1994 Governor's Cabinet Room· 2nd Floor Olds Plaza Building· I .ansing 1:00 p.m. • 4:00 p.m. I. Welcome and Introduction - Michelle Engler II. Approval of Minutes of October 29, 1993 - Michelle Engler III. Skillman Foundation - Announcement - Michelle Engler and Stan Stewart IV. Informational Items: a. New Executive Order for MCSC - Michelle Engler b. Legislative Update - Michelle Engler c. Corporation - Administrative Grant Award - Michelle Engler d. Update on Statewide Evaluation - Kyle Caldwell e. Progress Report for Abt Evaluation f. Regulations Update - Kyle Caldwell g. Attendance Policy V. Approval Items: a. Statewide Timelines b. Conflict of Interest Policy c. Upcoming Meeting Schedule d. 1992-93 Annual Report VI. Executive Director's Report 1. Teleconference Update - Kyle Caldwell 2. Technical Assistance Initiatives: a. AmeriCorps - RFP b. Learn/Serve MI CBO - RFP VI. Committee Reports a. MYPAC Update - Sarah Riley b. Partners in Service Project - Terry Langston c. Recognition Committee - Lisa Ditch Murray VII. New Business a. Executive Director Performance Review Process- Terry Pruitt b. 1994 Retreat for MCSC and MYPAC members - Michelle Engler VIII. Public Comment I X. Other Items Next Commission meeting will be May 20, 1994 in Flint hosted by Commissioner Gaines and Commissioner Blyth. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Agenda Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting agenda Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting agenda. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49598 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e50d6aaf72d353c072c093f325f3f7d9.pdf 511ad5b671883a4188389a744fc8fee4 PDF Text Text ..""• STA T E O F M IC H IGAN JOHN ENGLER , Governor MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION Chairperson M1chelle Eng ler 20 Executive Director D1ana Rodnguez -Aigra N. WASH INGTON SQUARE VICTO R OFFICE C EN TER LANSING . MICHIG AN 48933 TEL r5 17 1 335 --1295 FA X 1S 71 373-497 - March, 1994 Dear Americorps Program Applicant: Please find the enclosed "Request For Proposal," (RFP) that provides you with the information necessary for applying for AmeriCorps Program funds. It outlines requirements for your program's focus, problem identification and analysis, community involvement, youth involvement, ·overall goals, objectives, and project management Your application will be carefully reviewed to ensure that it falls within the specified program guidelines, and meets all outlined program criteria. - In order for your application to receive full consideration, it must be submitted to the following address on or before 5:00p.m. E.S.T. on April15, 1994. Attention: AmeriCorps Michigan Community Service Commission 111 South Capitol Avenue Old.s Plaza, 4th Floor P.O. Box 30015 Lansing, Michigan 48909 All applications must contain all information listed in the attached RFP package. It is also mandatory that a total of six (6) copies of the application be sent and one copy must be a signed original. Should you have any questions while preparing your application, or questions regarding this RFP, please do not hesitate to call our office at (517) 335-4295. ~A- Diana Algra, Executive Director Michigan Community Service Commission Attachment A Division of the Michigan Jobs Comm ission ._,, -... .. ... Q ; •IC'-(..4: "..,... ��Application Materials for Michigan AmeriCorps . Programs Application Deadline: April 15, 1994 Michigan Community Service Commission Olds Plaza Building • 111 S. Capitol Ave. • Lansing, MI 48906 • (517-335-4295) �Table of Contents 1 I. Overview II. Appli~ation III. AmeriCorps Funds 2 IV. Educational Awards 2 v. Restrictions 2 VI. Community Impact-Direct Benefit 3-6 VII. Strengthening Communities 6-7 VIII. Eligibility, Recruitment, and Selection 8 IX. Participant Benefits 9-10 X. Participant Release 10-11 XI. Mission, Objectives and Evaluation 11 XII. National Identity 11 XIII. Budget and Grant Requirements 12-13 XIV. Program Characteristics 13 XV. Selection Criteria 14-15 XVI. Priority Consideration 15-16 XVII. Definitions 16-18 XVIII. Application Guidelines 18-23 XIX. Forms and Directions 23-34 For Corporation Resources--AmeriCorps 1-2 ��AMERICORPS PROGRAMS REQUEST FOR PRO-POSALS MICHIGAN I. OYERYIEW In October, 1991 the Michigan Community Service Commis.sion (MCSC) was created by Governor John Engler to promote community setvice and volunteerism as ways to effectively meet local needs. The Michigan Jobs Commission on the behalf of the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) is sponsoring this competition and will request funding to support subgrant through funds authorized under the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. MCSC's mission is to encourage volunteerism, especially among young people, as an effective means of meeting the serious social challenges that face our communities today. The commission has been designated as Michigan's lead agency in applying for AmeriCorps funding from the Corporation for National and Community Setvice (The Corporation). On September 21, 1993, the President signed into law the National and Community Service Trust Act (the Act), which created The Corporation. The Corporation's mission is to engage Americans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service. This service will address the nation's educational, public safety, human, and environmental needs to achieve direct and demonstrable results. In doing so, the Corporation will foster civic responsibility. strengthen the ties that bind us together as a people, and provide educational opportunity for those who make a substantial commitment to service. The Corporation will fund, and assist in developing, high-quality national and community setvice programs, and it will help facilitate the transfer of information and technical expertise. The Corporation will also fund and support service-learning programs where community-based organizations positively impacting youth in elementary, middle, and secondary schools (K-12) as well as programs that utilize the talents of older Americans. A separate application is available for those seeking Serve and Learn Community-based Organizations funding. The MCSC will be the lead contact for local communities to solicit funding for AmeriCorps and Learn and Serve - Community-based Organizations (CBO) initiatives. This application is intended ml1I for those interested in funding a program under the AmeriCorps plan. II. APPLICATION FOR CORPORATION RESOURCES--AMERICORPS AmeriCorps is about getting things done. It will engage the energy and idealism of the American people, especially young people, in meeting the most critical educational, public safety, human, and environmental needs of our communities. It will strengthen communities and the civic character of our people through service, and reward those who answer the call to service with enhanced educational opportunity. AmeriCorps will enable 1 �thousands of Americans to serve in a variety of programs on a full-time or pan-time basis before, during, or after post-secondary education. In building the national service system, the Corporation aitns to support locally driven programs that meet rigorous national standards. This strategy will enable communities across the nation to channel the unique talents and creativity of Americans toward effectively addressing their most important needs. Eli~ble Applicants. Programs eligible to apply to MCSC for AmeriCorps grants include a wide variety of community corps, youth corps, specialized service programs focusing on a specific community need, individual placement programs, campus-based service programs, programs that train and place service learning coordinators in schools or team leaders in corps programs, intergenerational programs, professional corps, and the like. III. AMERICORPS FUNDS Formula allotment funds: Based on a formula based on population, the State of Michigan has been allotted $1,909,484 in program funds and approximately 138 educational awards. These funds are not entitlements. The MCSC must provide the Corporation with a detailed description of the programs proposed for funding and all programs must meet both the high quality standards of the MCSC and the Corporation. Competitive allotment: In addition to the grants made available to Michigan by formula allocation, the Corporation will make funds and educational awards available to states on a competitive basis. In total, approximately $51 million will be available to states nationwide. The MCSC must provide the Corporation with a detailed description of the programs proposed for funding and all programs must meet both the high quality standards of the MCSC and the Corporation. IV. EDUCATIONAL AWARDS Because the Corporation has more funds available for educational awards than for program costs, they strongly urge applicants that have adequate resources to cover program costs to request educational awards only. It is important to note that the educational awards are not actually "awarded" to programs. The awards are kept in the Treasury in the National Service Trust Fund until participants claim them following successful completion of a term of service. Programs will receive a designated number of approved slots, but will not actually receive any monetary assistance from the Corporation. likewise, participants, upon claiming the benefits, will not receive their award directly, but rather it will be provided on their behalf to their designated institution of higher education, training program, or lending institution (if for the re-payment of a student loan.) The participants must expend the educational awards seven (7) years after the service is completed. V. RESTRICTIONS Applicants may not apply for assistance for a project in more than one application. That is, applicants may not include the same project in more than one application. For example, a national nonprofit awarded Corporation (AmeriCorps) funds under this application may give subgrants to enable local affiliates to run various projects, but those affiliates may not seek additional AmeriCorps funds for the satne projects through the State Commissions. 2 �VI. COMMJJNIIY IMPACT - DIRECT BENEFIT National service programs that will be funded by the MCSC must meet education, public safety, human, and environmental needs in the community, and provide a direct and demonstrable benefit that is valued by the community. Service that provides a direct benefit includes physical projects such as renovating low income housing or creating a playground in a vacant lot, and human service projects such as tutoring, mentoring or conflict resolution. Eligible activities also include supervising participants or volunteers whose service provides a direct benefit to the community. In all cases, service activities must result in a specific identifiable service or improvement that does not duplicate the routine functions of workers or displace paid employees. Activities that do not provide a direct benefit to the community, such as clerical work or research, may be performed if they are in support of a direct service. However, such activities may not be the primary activity of a national service program For example, a team whose project involves providing meals, transponation, and health services to the homebound may need to conduct a door-to-door survey of community residents to help locate those in need of services; if they then go on to provide those services, this kind of research would be an appropriate activity for the team. Prohibited service. Prohibited activities may not be performed by participants in the course of their duties, at the request of the program staff or in a manner that would associate the activities with the national service program or the State Commission. These activities include: • any effort to influence legislation, as prohibited under s 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)); • organizing protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes; • assisting. promoting, or deterring union organizing; • impairing existing contracts for services <r collective bargaining agreements; • engaging in partisan political activities, cr other activities designed to influence the outcome of an election to any public office; • engaging in religious instruction. conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious education or wonhip, consttucting cr operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction cr worship, or engaging in any form of religious proselytization; and • providing a direct benefit to: (1) a business organized for profit; (2) a labor union; (3) a partisan political organization; (4) a nonprofit organization that fails to comply with the restrictions contained ins 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and (5) an organization engaged in the religious activities described above, unless Commission assistance is not used to support those religious activities. 3 �The Cm;poration and MCSC Priorities. In order to concentrate national efforts on meeting educational, public safety, human, or environmental needs, the MCSC, (in accordance with AmeriCorps), has identified priorities within each of the four main issue areas. Given the realities of limited resources and the extent to which other public, private and nonprofit responses to many of these needs already exist, it is important that the Commission suppons programs that undertake activities that have a maximum impact upon Michigan's communities. Unless there are compelling reasons to do otherwise, programs proposed for direct funding must address one or more of the following priority areas: education, environment, human needs, and public safety. Additional detail on each of these areas is outlined in the following text. (Applicants who are proposing programs that do not address the priority areas must provide reasons for not doing so in the application.) Education 1. 2. School Readiness: funhering early childhood development Examples include: • Improve the quality and availability of child development programs by working in day care and Head Start centers and preschool programs. • Teach literacy and other basic skills to parents of young children so that they can help their children learn. • Help teen parents stay in school by proving needed services, such as child care. School Success: improving the educational achievement of school-age children. Examples include: • Work in schools with high concentrations of low-income students. • Mentor, tutor, and provide after-school and SliiDIIlC'l' learning opportunities. • Coordinate service-learning activities for K-12 students. Epyjropmept 1. Neighborhood Environment: reducing community environmental hazards. Examples include: • Revitalize neighborhoods by creating and maintaining recreation areas, green spaces, and community gardens. • Eliminate environmental risks through education, testing, and cleanup. • Reduce waste trough energy efficiency efforts, recycling, and other conservation measures. 4 �2. Natural Environment: conserving, restoring, and sustaining natural habitats. Exaii?ples include: • Conserve and restore lands, forests, rivers, streams and wetlands. • Make parks more accessible through trail maintenance and infrastructure improvements. • Sample, map, monitor and record air and water quality and the status of ground water, land, plant, and animal resources. Human Needs 1. 2. Health: providing independent living assistance and home-and community-based health care. Examples include: • Providing independent living assistance and health care to homebound elderly, people with disabilities, and people living with AIDS. • Improving the health of low-income communities by offering preventive health services through community health clinics. • Offering prenatal care, parenting education, and health care to families of young children through home visits. Home: rebuilding neighborhoods and helping people who are homeless. Examples include: • Help people who are homeless by providing shelter support, assisting in moving into permanent housing, and related services. • Renovate and rehabilitate low-income housing. • Help individuals move from public assistance and into self-sufficiency by providing job training, literacy tutoring, and other services. Public Safety 1. Crime Control: improving criminal justice services, law enfcrcement, and victim Examples include: services. • Enhance community policing eff<Xts by working with local law enforcement. • Reduce specific crime problems such as drug dealing, domestic violence, crimes motivated by bias, crimes against senior citizens and child abuse. • Improve services available for victims of crime and strengthen innovative criminal justice programs, such as neighborhood courts and community restitution. 5 �2. Crime Prevention: reducing the incidence of violence. Examples include: • Reduce crimes against youth by making sch~ls safe, creating safe havens, providing training in conflict resolution, and involving youth in prevention efforts. • Provide substance abuse counseling and education. • Develop specific crime prevention strategies targeted at key locations such as playgrounds, public transportation points, and other public gathering places. VII. STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES Programs must strengthen communities, bringing together both institutions and individuals to cooperate in bringing about lasting and constructive change. There are two basic elements to the "strengthening communities" component of the MCSC service plan. The first is at the institutional level, the second is at the participant level. Institutional lmRact Programs will impact institutions in a variety of ways. AmeriCorps is geared to be a infrastrucutre building component to supplement current community initiatives. All programs should address the following pertinent areas: organizational capacity, sustainability, diversity and replication. Or&anizational CApacity Buildin&. Programs must enhance their connection to the community. Local engagement in service efforts is vital to developing effective programs, and to sustaining and building Michigan's communities. Thus, programs must perform projects that are designed, implemented, and evaluated with extensive and broad-based local input, including, consultation with representatives from the commnity served. participants (or potential participants) in the program, community-based agencies with a demonstrated record of experience in providing services, foundations, businesses, and local labor organizations representing employees of service sponsors if these entities exist in the area to be served by the program. Consultations with labor organizations will assist in strengthening communities by offering programs the opportunity to collaborate with various sectors of the community that can provide technical expertise in substantive areas. The full range of Michigan associations -civic, educational, religious, social service, and business -- should utilize the MCSC' s service plan as an opportunity to join together in the common work of service. Sustainability. A program must have the ability to sustain itself beyond the period of MCSC/Corporation support. Programs must show evidence of broad-based community support, show presence of multiple funding sources, and illustrate cost effectiveness. Diversity. Programs can strengthen communities by involving individuals from the community, bringing together diverse participants in activities that encourage mutual understanding and cooperation. Programs must agree to seek to include participants from the communities in which project are conducted. as well as individuals of different races and ethnicities, socioeconomic backgrounds, both men and women, and individuals with 6 �disabilities. Those programs that de not achieve diversity among participants in all areas may seek it by involving a djverse group of addjfional volunteers in other service alongside regular participants. In assessing whether programs meet this requirement, the Corporation recognized that certain programs require the recruittnent of participant:s who share a specific similar characteristic or background. For example, a professional corps that requires participants to possess specific post-secondary training might lack certain types of diversity by design. However, in no case may a program violate the nondiscrimination and nondisplacement rules governing participant selection Programs that lack diversity in one or more aspects nevertheless must strive for diversity in other ways. All programs should undertake activities that will provide the following key areas: Replication. A program should measme its level of replication and be prepared to be a resource for others. Programs should be willing to share lessons learned from their experiences with other communities to further build infrastructures across Michigan and the country. Participant Impact Programs can seek dramatically different sorts of impacts on participants, depending on their designs. In professional corps, significant goals include improving particular skills and illustrating the importance of using specialized skills to address pressing needs. In service entrepreneurship initiatives, goals far participant impacts include the development of leadership and managerial skills. However, all programs should seek to instill a spirit of citizenship although programs will achieve this goal in different ways. Citizenship Programs must help participants develop, through their service experiences, the ethic and skills needed far productive, active citizenship. Programs should thoughtfully employ service-learning <r other educational methods in order to develop participants' skills in solving community problems, and to cultivate a lifelong ethic of productive, active citizenship.- Because voting is an imp<rtant component of citizenship, every program must ensure, in a non-partisan manner, that each participant who is eligible to vote register to vote. Irainin,. EdUCation. and Supervision. Programs must provide participants with the training, skills, and knowledge necessary to perform the tasks required in their respective projects. In fulfilling this requirement, programs should provide participants with background information on the community to help them understand why the service projects are needed. Programs may also provide, if appropriate, specific training in a particular field, including training and educational components designed to help participants explore career possibilities in areas such as child development, teaching, public health, or public safety. Support Services. Programs must provide support services that help participants: ( 1) who are completing a term of service to other educational and career opponunities and (2) who are school dropouts to earn equivalent of a high school diploma. 7 �VIII. ELIGWILITY. RECRUITMENT. AND SELECTION Tenus of Seryice. Programs may engage participants on a full-time or part-tune basis. Full-time participants must serve at least 1700 hours over 9 months to 1 year. Part-time participants must serve at least 900 hours over 2 years. If the part-time participant is enrolled in an institution of higher education while performing some or all of the service, the individual must provide at least 900 hours over a period of up to 2 to 3 years. Eli~bility for a Second Tenn. To be eligible to serve a second additional term of service, an individual must receive satisfactory performance review(s) for any previous term(s) of service. Mere eligibility for an additional term of service does not, however, guarantee selection or placement Participants' eligibility for second or a additional tenns of service must be based on a midterm and end-of-term evaluation of participants' performance, focusing on such factors as (1) whether the participant has completed the required number of hours; (2) whether the participant has satisfactorily completed assignments, tasks or projects; and (3) whether the participant has met any other performance criteria which were clearly communicated both orally and in writing at the beginning of the term of service. Selectiop. Flrst, the MCSC encourages programs to select participants, from their own communities, who possess leadership potential and a commitment to the goals of this service program. regardless of educational level, work experience, or economic background. Second, programs must select participants in a non-partisan, non-political, non-discriminatory manner. Third, programs must establish minimum qualifications for participants related to the service they will provide. Finally, programs must ensure that they do not displace any existing paid employees. The MCSC advocates for communities to recruit members of their community to fill the positions of the participants. However, there will be opportunities to recruit diverse participants from around the state and country. The Corpaation will create a national recruitment pool and the MCSC will develop a pool specific to Michigan to help facilitate some recruitment fer programs. The individuals in these pools will be those that have shown an interest in serving in different communities other than their own. The MCSC strongly encourages programs to select some participants from state and national recruitment systems in order to supplement local recruitment with people who: (1) are from different backgrounds and regions of the nation; (2) have special skills or training; and (3) desire to serve but live in areas where there are few or no national service programs. In an effort to defray costs associated with the transpcrtation of MCSC program participants from the national service participant pool, the MCSC, through the Corporation, will be able to pay the transpcrtation costs and in cases of hardship, relocation costs up to $550 for up to 10% of a program's service participants selected from the national recruitment system. Such costs are subject to certain conditions and restrictions. Participant Contracts. To ensure that participants understand what will be expected from them, programs must use participant contracts that stipulate terms of service, acceptable conduct, grievance procedures, and termination rules, and other assurances as required by the Commission and the Corporation. 8 �I X. PARTICIPANT BENEFITS Livin~ AlloWances. The program must provide an annuallivil_lg allowance to each full-time participant The amount of the living allowance must be at least, but not more than twice, $7,440 for fiscal year 1994 or about $4.40 per hour, assuming a total of 1700 hours served. No more than 85%, or approximately $6,324, of each participant's minimum living allowance and related employment taxes may be paid by the Corporation through AmeriCorps or other Federal funding sources. Programs may provide a prorated living allowance to part-time national service participants and to participants who are authorized to serve a reduced term of service. However, the Corporation will not pay more than 85% of the prorated living allowance. For programs utilizing part-time participants, the Corporation will fund up to 85% of the living allowance if the program chooses to offer a living allowance. The Corporation may waive or reduce the required living allowance if a program demonstrates that requirement is inconsistent with the program objectives and that the proposed living allowance is sufficient to meet the necessary costs of living (including food, housing, and transportation) in the program's area of location. Additionally, the living allowance requirement does not apply to programs that were in existence prior to September 21, 1993 or to a program that receives only service educational awards from the Corporation. Professional corps programs may provide participants a living allowance that exceeds the maximum amount ($14,880 for fiscal year 1994), but Commission funds may not be used to pay for any portion of the living allowance. Educational Awards,. An individual serving in a Corporation approved position will receive an educational award from the National Service Trust upon successful completion of each term of service for up to two terms. Full-time AmeriCorps service participants, upon successful completion of a term of service, will receive an educational award of $4,725. Part-time participants serving 900 hours will receive $2,363. Participants who are released by the program before completing a required term of service for demonstrated and compelling personal circumstances may receive a prorated national se:vice educational award, while participants who are released for cause may not The Corporation is requiring each applicant to describe the rationale for its distribution of educational awards to program participants. In general, this distribution should treat equally all participants doing the same <r substantially similar work. Nevcnheless, the Corporation recognizes that equal treatment may not be feasible <r desirable in some instances. Although the Corporation does not expect to fund programs in which unequal treatment is based on participants' financial need, it will evaluate on a case-by-case basis the rationales of programs that do not plan to provide all participants with educational awards. A program also could choose to offer alternative post-service benefits to participants in lieu of the national service educational awards provided by the Corporation. All Corporation programs are strongly encouraged to offer alternative post-service benefits, such as tuition credits at an institution of higher education <r transition assistance to participants who will not receive Corporation educational awards. 9 �Child Care· Programs must provide child care or a child care allowance to any full-time participant who needs such assistance in order to participate. All (100%) of the child care expenses will be paid by the Corporation, but those expenses must be estimated in the application. The Corporation defines need, to be consistent With Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990, as follows: total family income of the participant must be less than 75% of the State median income; the participant must reside with and be a parent or guardian of a child under the age of 13; and the participant must not be receiving child care assistance from another source at the time of acceptance into the program, unless the participant would become ineligible for child care by virtue of enrolling in the program. To ensure that funded care meets minimum health and safety standards, the regulations also tie eligible providers and the amount of the child care allowance to the Child Care and Development Block Grant of 1990. Hea}th ~ Programs must provide health care benefits to full-time national service participants who are not otherwise insured The Corporation will defme a minimum benefits package that the MCSC will use, and up to 85% of the cost of an affordable policy that provides these benefits. Any program wishing to provide alternative benefits will need to obtain approval from the Corporation. Disability. Programs must provide reasonable accommodation, including auxiliary aids and services (as defined in S3(1) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102(1)) based on the individualized need of a participant who is a qualified individual with a disability (as defined inS 101(8) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 12111(8)). Service programs funded through the MCSC may apply for additional financial assistance from the Corporation for the purpose of complying with this provision. X• PARTICIPANT RELEASE Reasons for Release. Programs may release participants for two reasons, for: (1) compelling personal circumstances or (2) for cause as defined by the MCSC and the Corporation, or by the program's participant contract. In both cases, programs have the primary responsibility for determining when to release a participant Participants released due to compelling personal circumstances may receive ~rated educational awards while participants released for cause may not. Release for Cause. Programs must release participants for cause if they are convicted of a felony. If participants are charged with a violent felony or the sale or distribution of a controlled substance, or if they are convicted of the possession of a controlled substance, or if they are convicted of the possession of a controlled substance, programs must suspend their service without a living allowance and without receiving credit for hours miw:d. Programs may add additional provisions for releasing participants for cause in the participant contract. A participant who is wrongly released or suspended for cause will receive credit for any service missed and back-pay for missed living allowances. The legislation further describes the conditions under which participants whose service has been suspended may be reinstated, the impact of release for cause, and the grievance procedure available to participants. 10 �Guideline. Programs must establish written guidelines, to be incorporated into the participant contract, that explain the circumstances under which participants will be released for cause. X I. MISSION. OBJECTivES ANJl EVALUATION Mission aod Awual Objectives. Programs must establish a mission statement and annual objectives covering each of the following: meeting community needs, strengthening community, and developing participant citizenship and other skills. Although the relative significance of different objectives will vary by program type, in general, the community impact objectives will bear considerably greater weight in the selection process than the community strengthening and participant development objectives. Internal eyaluation/Monitorin~. Programs must track progress towards the annual program objectives. Programs must monitor the quality of services provided, the satisfaction of both persons served and program participants, and management effectiveness. Internal evaluation and monitoring should be a continuous process, allowing for frequent feedback and quick correction of weaknesses. Internal evaluation and monitoring approaches such as community advisory councils, participant advisory councils, peer reviews, quality control inspections, and customer and participant surveys and encouraged. Comoration Eyaluatiop. Programs must cooperate with the Corporation through the MCSC and its evaluators in all MCSC and Corporation monitoring and evaluation efforts, including in-depth studies of selected programs. Additionally, programs must collect and submit to the Corporation the following data: (1) information on participants including the total number of participants in the program, and the number of participants by race, ethnicity, sex, age, gender, economic background, education level, disability classification, geographic region, and marital status and (2) information on services conducted in areas classified as empowerment zones (or redevelopment areas) including areas that are adversely affected by Federal actions related to the management of Federal lands, in areas that are greater than the national average. Additional data may be collected and submitted if the program deems it appropriate. XII. NATIONAL IDENIIIY Identification. To help promote a national identity fer all AmeriCaps programs and participants, programs must agree to identify the program, through the use of logos, common application materials, and other means, as part of a larger national effort and to participate in other activities such as common opening ceremonies (including the administration of a national oath or affirmation), service days, and conferences. A national service programs may continue to use its own name as the primary identification, logo, or other identifying materials on uniforms or other items. Start of Oj)eratiops. Programs must agree to begin operations in late May or June, late August or September, or January. Creating "classes" of participants who begin and "graduate" from their terms of service at the same time will help create a national identity. In addition, programs must agree to fill all national service positions left vacant by attrition by no later than six weeks after the program starting date. This requirement reflects the consideration that continually filling positions left vacant by attrition may erode the sense of cohesion among participants and other national service programs. This requirement will also facilitate recruiting in concert with the academic calendar years. 11 �XIII. BUDGET AND GRANT REOUIREMENIS Prowro Cost. Corporation funds may not exceed 75% of the program's (whether the program is·a grantee or subgrantee) total cost. The program must provide the remaining share of funds through cash or in-kind contributions. In-kind contributions are the value of goods or services donated by a third party in suppon of the project. The remaining share of funds may come from Federal, State, or local sources. However, the Corporation may waive the budget match requirement if it determines that there is a lack of available financial · resources at the local level. Liyin~ Allowance. For each eligible participant, no more than 85% of each participant's minimum living allowance and related employment taxes may be paid by the Corporation or other Federal funds. Child Care Allowance. For each eligible participant, the Corporation will pay 100% of the child care allowance, or, if the program provides child care through an eligible provider, the actual cost of the care or the amount of the allowance, whichever is less. Hea}th Care Allowance. For each eligible participant, the Corporation will pay up to 85% of the cost of an affordable policy that provides minimum benefits. The Corporation will not pay any share of the cost of a policy that does not include the minimum benefits package as defined by the Corporation_ National Recruitment. The Corporation will pay the transponation cost, and in cases of hardship, ielocation costs of up to $550 for each participant, up to 10% of a program's participants, selected from the national recruitment system. Such costs are subject to certain conditions and restrictions. Administrative Costs. Not more than 2.6% of the grant amount may be used to pay for administrative costs. Administrative costs are costs associated with the overall administration of an AmeriCorps program. Such costs include the following: (1) indirect costs (i.e., costs identified with two or more cost objectives but not identified with a particular cost objective) as described in applicable provisions of Office of Management and Budget Circulars that relate to indirect costs; (2) costs for financial, accounting, or contracting functions; (3) costs for insurance that protects the entity that operates the program; and (4) costs for salaries and benefits of the direcur and any other administrative staff of the program. Administrative costs do not include allowable costs directly related to program operations, such as: (1) costs for living allowances and training of participants; (2) costs for staff training; (3) costs for travel; (4) costs related to the evaluation of the program; and (5) costs for salaries and benefits of staff who recruit, train, place, or supervise participants. Particular costs such as those associated with staff who perform both administrative and program functions may be prorated between administrative costs and costs directly related to program operations. EQuipment Not more than 10% of the grant amount may be used to purchase equipment to be used for progranunatic operation_ 12 �Match Regujremepts Expenses for full-time participants Contributions from tbe Corporation Exp~cted contributions from Programs Health Care Not more than 85% At least a 15% Cash Match Living Allowance Not more than 85% At least a 15% Cash Match Child Care 100% of expenses Overall program operating costs Not more than 75% of overall operating costs Equipment 0% Remaining in-kind and/or cash support Not more than 10% of the Remaining costs for equipment total grant award Grant Size Restriction. No AmeriCorps grants awarded through the State of Michigan shall exceed $276,000 per 20 full-time participants (or equivalent). Office of Management and Budget Circulars. Program must comply with all applicable OMB circulars for grant management and Federal laws, including the supplementation, nonduplication, and nondisplacement provisions set forth in 45 CFR 2506.2. XIV. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS Promm Tm;s. Applicants have a great deal of flexibility to design programs that will best achieve the three types of impacts: "getting things done" in communities, strengthening the ties that bind communities together, and improving the citizenship and skills of participants. This flexibility includes the ability to target individuals of a certain age or skill level to participate; involve appropriate partner organizations to train, supervise, or support participants; and place participants individually in project or organize them in teams. Similarly, programs may determine whether a full-time or part-time schedule is more appropriate to the program's goals, and if participants may serve for a second term within the same program. for example, as a team leader. Promm ~. Programs must be large enough to achieve a demonstrable impact on the community served. Thus, while the actual size of each program may vary depending on the size of the community in which in operates, the design of the program, and other factors, the Corporation encourages programs to enroll at least 20 full-time equivalent participants, reg~ess of whether participants are placed individually or in teams. 13 �XV. SELECTION CRITERIA Planning Grants. The MCSC and the Corporation may fund planning grants in fiscal year 1994. In evaluating applications for planning grants, the criteria discussed above relating to program concept, organizational capacity, need, and program and participant mix will apply. In addition, they will consider the quality of the plan for developing the program, the track record of the organization in launching new initiatives, and the appropriateness of the planning budget. Each planning grant will be limited to a $50,000 maximum. Proposals for planning grants will be entered into the pool of proposals for competitive funding through states and nm the formula allotment. Qperatin~ Grants. In selecting among applications for operating grants, including educational awards, and applications for educational awards only, the Corporation and the MCSC will apply the following criteria: • Demonstrated need; • Quality and innovation of the concept and design of the program; • Track record, experience and capacity of the sponsoring organization; • Sustainability Nw[ClQ%) In selecting programs, MCSC and the Corporation will take into consideration the extent to which both the progxam overall and its particular project will address needs important to the community and be conducted in areas of need as defined in the legislation. Legislated areas of need are: • Communities designated by the Federal Government or states as empowerment zones c:r redevelopment areas, targeted for special economic incentives, or otherwise identifiable as having high concentrations of low-income people. • Areas that are environmentally distressed. • Areas adversely affected by Federal actions related to the management of Federal lands that result in significant regional job losses and economic dislocation. • Areas adversely affected by reduction in Defense spending or the closure or realignment of military installations. • Areas that have unemployment rates greater than the national average unemployment fer the most recent 12 months for which satisfactory data are available. Quality (70%) a. Promm Desim (4()%l. The MCSC and the Corporation will consider the quality of the program based on: the potential impact of using proposed national service participants to meet the community needs being addressed; 14 �inclusion of a clear and compelling mission statement; identification of specific objectives and indicators of success; development of an effective recruitment, selection, and training plan for s~ and participants, including recruittnent of participants and staff from the community to be served; ability to provide appropriate supervision, counseling, service-learning and other education opportunities, and outplacement to participants; the involvement of participants and community residents in the design, operation, and leadership of the program; development pf a sound plan for continually improving the program based on self-assessment and monitoring of community and participant satisfaction with work perfonned; inclusion of an appropriate organization and staffing plan; and the program's cost-effectiveness in achieving identified outcomes, including per participant cost b. Or~anizational Capacity C30%). The MCSC and the Corporation will consider organizational capacity based on: the quality of the leadership of the service program; the past perfonnance of the organization or program; the organization's connection to the community; the extent to which the program builds on existing programs; evidence of strong and broad-based community suppon for the program; and availability of additional funding sources for the program. An application proposing the replication of an existing program will also be evaluated based on the success of the program in its original site, including the results of any evaluation undertaken; the program's analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the mginal program; reasons for selecting the replication site and discussion of adjusttnents needed for adaptation to a new site; and the qualification of the leaders of the program at the new site. Sustajpabilitv UQ%) The MCSC and the Corporation will consider the ability of the program to sustain itself beyond the period of Corporation support; presence of multiple or private funding sources; and cost-effectiveness. Additional consideration will be given to programs that significantly exceed the match with non-Federal funds; and to State departments that are providing a substantial match to Corporation funds. Ippoyatjop awl Replicatiop (JQ%) The MCSC and the Ccxporation will consider the degree to which needs coincide to program design. the innovative aspects of the program, and the appopriateness of replicating the program in the future. XVI. PRIORITY CONSIDERATION In addition to the criteria oo which individual applications will be ~ MCSC and the Corporation will give priority consideration to the following issues: • Start Date. The MCSC and the Corporation is especially interested in funding programs that will be able to stan up quickly, in September 1994, after completing an appropriate planning phase. 15 �• Participant Diversity. The MCSC and the Corporation seek a broadly diverse participant pool that includes a large representation of young adults; proportionate ratio of individuals who have not attended college and _those with college-education experience; approximately equal numbers of men and women; individuals of all races and ethnicities; and individuals with physical and cognitive disabilities. • Prowro lJlx<. The MCSC and the Corporation anticipates funding a range of program types that will yield the desired participant pool. Due to the large number of pre- or non-college youth who are participating in existing youth service programs eligible for Corporation funding under other applications, the Corporation will give priority consideration under this application to applicants proposing programs that involve significant numbers of participants with college-education experience. Because most existing youth service programs address a variety of issue areas, the Corporation will also give priority consideration to programs focused on particular national priorities. • Geowwhic Diversity. The MCSC and the Corporation will ensure that the programs funded are geographically diverse and include projects in both urban and rural areas. • Geowwhic Concentration. The MCSC and the Corporation may fund programs that will enable it to test the effect of concentrating a critical mass of participants in a small geographic area such as a rural community, small city, or part of a larger city. • Special Considerations. The MCSC and the Corporation will give special consideration to programs able to start-up quickly as a result of having completed a planning phase; programs having start dates in late May or June, late August or September, or January; programs seeking participants with college education experience; and programs able to leverage funds at a level beyond that required by the Act. XVII. DEFINITIONS Act means the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. Administrative Costs means costs associated with the overall administration of an AmeriCorps program, including such costs as the following: financial, accounting, or contracting functions, insurance that protectS the entity that operates the program; salaries and benefits of the director and any other administrative staff of the program. Administrative costs do not include allowable costs diretly related to program operations. These program costs include: living allowances and training of participants; staff training; travel; evaluation and monitoring; salaries and benefits of staff who recruit, train, place, or supervise particpants. AmeriCorps Educational Award means a national service educational award given to participants who successfully complete the required number of service hours for full-time or part-time participation in an AmeriCorps program. AmeriCorps Participant means any individual who is serving in an approved AmeriCorps program. 16 �AmeriCorps Program means any program that receives Corporation funds under section 121 of the Act Applicant means the entity of consortia of entities that propc)ses to administer or operate an AmeriCorps program with assistance provided under the Act Consortia means a group of organizations eligible for Corporation assistance under the State of Michigan application, or a nonprofit organization created or identified by such a group, whose purpose is to facilitate and support the work of member organizations in ways the add material and human resources beyond those available to each member individually. Corporation means the Corporation for National and Community Service established under section 191 of the Act Eligible Participants are those who: are 17 years of age or older at the commencement of service, unless the individual is in a youth corps program in which case the participant must be between the ages of 16 and 25; either have received a high school diploma or its equivalC'J}t, including and alternative diploma or certificate for those individuals with mental and physical disabilities for who such alternative diplomas or certificates are appropriate, or agree to obtain a high school diploma or its equivalent; have not dropped out of school in order to enroll as a national service participant; are citizens or nations of the United States or lawful permanent resident aliens of the United States; and meet the task-related eligibility requirements established by the program. Michigan Community Service Commission is the State Commission established by Executive Order 1993-24. Partnership means a joint arrangement among a group of organizations eligible for Corporation assistance under the State of Michigan application, or a nonprofit organization created or identified by such a group, whose purpose is to carry out common objectives that are specific and well-defined, and in which the responsibilities of each partner are clearly defined and mutually undcntood. Program means a planned and coordinated group of activities, and procedures linked by common elements such as recruitment and selection of participants, training for participants and staff, regular group activities, and assignment to projects which are: organized for the pmpose of achieving the mission and gaols of national service; and carried out with the assisance provided under the Act Project means an activity canied out through a program that receives assistance under the Act, that results in a specific identifiable service or improvement that otherwise would not be done with existing funds, and that does not duplicate the routine services or functions of the ~ployer to who participants are assigned. Service Learning is a method under which participants learn and develop through active participation in thoughtfully organized service experiences that meet actual community needs and that are coordianted in collaboration with the community; that is integrated into the participants' schedule of activities or provides structured time for a participant to think, talk or write about what the participant did and saw during the actual service activity; that provides participants with opponunities to use newly acquired skills and knowledge in real- 17 �life situations in their own communities; and that enhances what skills and knowledge the participants brought with them to the program by extending the learning experience beyond a classroom environments and into the community; and by helping to foster the development of a sense of caring for others. Service Opportunity is a program or project, including a service learning program or project, that enables participants to perform meaningful and constructive service in agencies, instituions and situations where the applciation of human talent and dedication may help to meet human, educational, linguistic, public safety and environmental community needs, especially those relating to poverty. Service Sponsor is an organization, or other entity, that has been selected to provide a placement for a participant Student means an individual who is enrolled in an educational institution on a full or parttime basis. Subdividions of the State means states department and units of local government such as cities, counties, and municipalities. XVIII.APPLICAIION GUIDELINES Application Submission. Applicants must submit an unbound original and five (5) unbound copies of the complete application. Applications must be received by the MCSC by 5:00 PM · Eastern Daylight Savings Time, April 15, 1994. Applications must be mailed to the address below in an envelop clearly marked AMERICORPS APPLICA IION. AMERICORPS APPLICA IION c/o Michigan Community Service Commission 111 S. Capitol, Olds Plaza Building, 4th Floor Lansing, MI 48906 APl?lication Review. The MCSC will evaluate the applications using a peer review and staff review process. The Corporation will review the strongest proposals that have passed the MCSC evaluation criteria. In addition, the Corporation and/or the MCSC may conduct, at its discretion, discussions or site visits with some or all applicants before making final grant decisions. To facilitate the review process, the Corporation and the MCSC have developed an outline around which each application package must be organized. Applicants must submit application packages in accordance with the following guidelines. OJ>eratin& Grants R)RMAT: 1. Title Page (one page only) 2. Table of contents page (one page only) 3. Application summary page (one page only) 18 �4. . Program mission and objectives form 5. Progi-am narrative (no more than 20 pages) a. Needs b. Program design . · c. Participant recruitment, profile, and benefits d Internal evaluation/monitoring activities e. Institutional and personnel information 6. Budget form page(s) and budget narrative (included) 7. Assurances signature page (one page) (included) 8. Certification signature page (one page) (included) Do not exceed the page limits specified for each required section or the application will be disqualified. Applications must be double-sided (each side counting as one page), double spaced and printed in font type not smaller than 12 points. 1. Title page form. Complete the provided form. 2. Table of contents page. Provide the page numbers of each item requested in the application format 3. Application summary page. In one page, provide an overview of the following items: - • the specific needs to be met, panicularly as they relate to the national priorities in the four issue areas • key elements of the program design • recruitment goals, including the percentage of participants to be drawn from the national recruitment system (if any) • description of the administering organization and identification of primary program partners 4. Program mission and objectives. Complete the provided form. 5. Program narrative. In no more than 20 pages, organized and labeled in the stipulated categories, provide the following information in a narrative form with as much specificity as possible. • (a) Need(s) and appropriateness. Identify the nature of the specific need(s) to be met by the proposed national service program, including how and why these needs are appropriately or uniquely addressed by a national service program. 19 �Needs. What specific needs will the program address and how do these needs relate to the national priorities? If they do not relate to the national priority areas, please explain why they were selected. Process. What was the process by which the needs were identified? Who was involved in identifying the needs? To what extent were residents of the community, in which the service will be provided, involved in the needs assessment activities? • (b) Program Design. Describe the concept and design for the program, including the nature of specific service activities to be performed by participants and how these activities address the identified needs and meet the program objectives. Promro Concept What is the basic concept for the design of the program? How will the program be structured? Where will it be located? Describe any institutional or programmatic collaborations or partnerships that will be involved in operating the program, including the extent to which the program builds on existing infrastructure. Service Activities. What activities will participants engage in, and how do these projects or activities result in direct measurable service that addresses the identified needs? Describe a typical week in the life of program participants, giving concrete examples of the types of activities or duties participants will perform. Relation to Need. How do the service activities respond to the identified need? Participant Irainin& and Sumxm. How will participants be trained, supported, or otherwise prepared for their assignments or placements? Describe the key elements of the participant training, in-service education, or servicelearning curriculum employed to improve participants' skills, prepare them for placement, and foster positive civic values. Programs should develop a on-week orientation or training session foc participants specific to the individual program needs. Participant Placement and Supervision. How will participants be placed (in teams or individually) and matched with assignment? How will service sponsors or host-sites be oriented and prepared for that placement? How will participants be supervised within the program? 20 �• (c) Participant Profile, Recruitment Strategy, and Benefits. Provide a description of the total number and type (full- or part-time) of participants to be recruited in the program. including the expected characteristics, attributes or skills of participants? Describe the benefits these participants will receive. Number and Characteristics of Participants. What are the expected number and characteristics of participants, including racial or ethnic background, socioeconomic status, gender and educational attainment? If the program will recruit fewer than 20 participants, please explain why this smaller number is appropriate to the purpose and design of the program. Participant Recruitment. What methods will be used or strategies undertaken to recruit participants? Describe your methods and strategies to achieve your recruitment goals. Participant Selection. What strategies will you use to select participants? Describe selection criteria, including minimum qualifications for participants. Will participants be required to possess any specialized skills to carry out service assignments? Will any participants be drawn from the national recruitment system? Participant Benefit. What benefit will participants receive? Describe the amount of the living allowance provided to each participant Describe how national service educational awards will be apponioned among program participants (if not provided to all participants). Describe any alternative post-service benefits that might be used. • (d) Internal Evaluation and Monitoring Activities. Describe internal evaluation and moniuxing activities: Internal Evaluation and Monitorin&. How will you monitor progress toward your program objectives? How will you assess, on an ongoing basis, the quality of service and the satisfaction of both the participants and the individuals or institutions served? How will you collect the required descriptive and demographic data? Preyious Evaluation. FOI" applicants proposing to replicate an existing program in other area, has the program proposed for replication or expansion been evaluated? If so, by who and what were the results of the evaluation regarding community and participant impact? If the program has not been evaluated, what evidence of successful perfonnance or of a tack record does the program have that will demonstrate its appropriateness for replication or expansion? 21 �• (e) Institutional and Personnel Information. Provide a description of the administering organization's past experience and institutional capacity to operate or coordinate a program comparable to the program(s) proposed, including the organization's ability to recruit and train staff. Principal Staff. What are the background, experience and major accomplishments of the program director and principal staff, and how do their qualifications relate to their duties in and responsibilities for the proposed programs. If not yet hired, what qualifications must the candidates fulfill? Trainin,. What kind of orientation and training, if any, will you provide for staff? Institutional Stren~s. What institutional resources or expertise will the administering organization(s) provide that will contribute to the overall success of the program? 6. Budget form page and budget narrative. Complete the provided form. 7. Assurances signature form. Complete the provided fonn 8. Certification signature form. Complete the provided form. Plaonin' Grants FORMAI: 1. Title Page (one page only) 2. Table of contents page (one page only) 3. Application summary page (one page only) 4. Program mission and objectives form (included) Do not repeat the infonruztion tluzt will be included in the program narrative. Give a brief synopsis of the mission and objectives as it applies to the following: a. b. Needs being addressed. process for identifying the needs Planning activities • Basic program concept developed to meet identified needs • Planning process and what tasks will be carried out on what timeline • Cormnunity involvement 22 �Who will be involved and how? What expertise/representation do these parties bring to the process? How will these people represent those involved in the program? Specify (as much as is feasible) each person(s) tasks in this process. 5. Program narrative (no more than 20 pages) a. Needs b. Program design c. Participant recruitment, profile, and benefits d. Internal evaluation/monitoring activities e. Institutional and personnel infonnation 6. Budget form page(s) and budget narrative (included) 7. Assmances signature page (one page) (included) 8. Certification signature page (one page) (included) X I X. FORMS AND DIRECTIONS The following section includes master forms to be used in the submission of your grant application. Feel free to make multiple copies as necessary for your grant submission. Please be sure that the assurances and certification pages are signed. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Title Page Mission Statement Budget Form Assurances Certifications 23 ��Title Page . AmeriCorps State Application Please type or print in black ink. 1. 2. Proposal Title: Legal Applicant: Contact Person's Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone/Fax: 3. Institutional Information: OS tate Department OHigher Education 4. ONon Profit Organizations OOther Project Director: Organization's Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone/Fax: 5. 6. Grant Type: OPlanning m: Issue Areas and Priorities: OOperating m: OEducational Awards Only OEducational OSchool Readiness OSchool Success OEnvironment ONeighborhood Environment ONatural Environment • DHuman Needs OlndependentlJving OCommunity Revitalization DPublic Safety OViolence Prevention OCrime Control DSpecific Local Need 7. OUrban 9. 8. Area(s) to be Served: OSuburban ORural Budget: YR1 Corporation Funds Requested: YR2 YR3 Total Budget Amount YR2 YR3 10. Project Duration: YR1 11. Start Date End Date Number of Program Terms 12. Participants: # of Full-time Participants #of Part-time Participants II of Full-time Participants Needing Educational A wards #of Part-time Participants Needing Educational A wards # of Unfunded Participants # of Participants Needing Child Care Program operates in an area of need as identified by the Corporation: ONo OYes m: Which one? Certification: The applicant certifies to the best of his/her knowledge and belief that the data in this application are true and correct and that the filing of the application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and that the applicant will comply with the assurances required of applicants if the assistance is approved. Name: Title: Signature: Phone: 24 Date: ��Directions The Mission Swement should express the JXOgram 's vision with regard to the three key goals of national service --meeting community needs, strengthening communities, and developing participant citizenship and skills. Here you should indicate the ultimate impacts that you wiSh to achieve--"reduce violence in schools," and the like. Please be aware that to demonstrate the impact of national service grants, the Corpaation may assess your pgoram 's success in achieving its mission, but you will not be responsible for this type of evaluation. your mission statement shgould therefore be geared to the most ambitious goals you believe that you can achieve, even if you do not believe you can measure them on your own. Your Annual Objectives should be derived from your mission statement and should reflect as directly as possible your desired impacts. You will be responsible for assessing your success in achieving your annual objectivies. These should be quantitative wherever possible and, in all cases, demonsttable. Each objective should address only one activity, include only one result, and provide at least one indicator of quality or customer satisfaction. For example: "To assist500 homebound elderly to live inckpen.tkntly with 80% of the involved elderly indicaJing thaJ they could not live independently without this assistance." To the extent possible, programs should develop outcome objectives that indicate real changes in the performance or activities of communities cr individuals: in a tutoring program, level of improved academic achievement; in a safe schools program, percent of reduction in school violence; in a homelessness program, number of transitions to permanent housing. The Corporation recognizes, however, that impacts are often hard to measureand difficult to assign speciflCally to one intervention. In these cases, other indicatas of success, such as staff satisfaction, may be more appropriate. The Corporation encoruages programs to develop innovative ways to demonsttate impacts, such as customer surveys and before/after videotapes, along with the more traditional measures such as test schores, graduation rates, and staff satisfaction rates. As a rule, programs should seek to establish the most ambitious objectives whose achievement they will be able to clearly demonstrate. Example objectives rollow. They represent only a suggested form for such objectives; you are encouraged to be both creative and realistic as you design objectives for your own program. Community Impact Examples Educatioa • To provide an avrzage of five hours of tutoring·weekly to each of 200 junicr high school sutdents, with 50% improved test performance and 80% teacher satisfactioo. HumaD Services To rehabiiwe 20 low-income housing units, achieving "significant improvement" ratings from 35% of neighborhood residents polled after project completion. EoviroameDt To construct 10 miles of hiking trails, obtaining 85% "excellent" ratings on the trails from trail users surveyed after completion. Public Sarety To provide 2000 how's of violence prevention patrols in 10 high-violence schools, resulting in a 33% decline in violence. Community-Buildini EXIJJ)plcs To form partnerships with 5 compancies as reflected by co-sponsored activities and subslantial involvement by company penonnel To build JX'Ogr&m capacity by forming partnerships with 3 community-based organlz.atioos as demonstrated by cosponsaed projects and usc ol shared resources. Participant Deyelapment ExamPles • To develop a sustained commitment to educatioo in 60% of participants, as demonstrated by continued work in the field of cducatioo during the next year. To improve citizenship of 80% ol participants, as evidenced by continued commitment to improving their community. 25 ��0 Applicant Name: - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - 0 Program Name: Mission Statement and Atlnttal Objectives - -- -~:~. What is your program's mission statement? Each application must include statements of primary objectives in three areas: Community Service, Community Building, ami Participant Development . Please use ll separate copy of this form to describe your objectives in each area (i.e., Conummicy Service, Community Building, Participant Development). In the case of community services, also use a separate form for each priority area, if you are working on more chan one (i.e. education, environment, elc.). This page applies to: 0 Community Service 0 Education D Environment ~ 0 0 0 Public Safely D I Iuman Needs Participant Development Community Building What are your annual objectives in the area checked above? List your three primary A. n. c. ~bjeclives. I ��National Service Programs Budget For111 P/(ase attaciJ tl1e But/get Nt1rrative to tl1is page. A. Participant Support Costs - • Living Allowance (may not exceed 85% of CNCS funds) !:nr&Mll'ation (CNCS} MAI.ill fluncls llequested from the Corporation Other Federal/ State/Local/ Private Funds $_ + _ • Education Awards (to be held in trust by the CNCS) Inial Tot.11 Program Pundhtg = · - -- - --- • lleallh Care (may not exceed 85% of CNCS funds) • Chi ld Care - · - -- - • Training and Education • Uniforms • FICA and Workers' Compensation • Other (specify in Budget Narrative) Subtotal ~ ll. Staff • Salaries • Benefits • Training • O ther (please specify in lludget Narrative) Subtotal C. Operational --------- • Travel/Transportation • Supplies • Equipment • Other (please specify in Budget Narrative) Subtut<~l ------------ ----·- ----- 11. Internal Evaluation/Monitoring E. Administration (may not exceecl5% of Corporation funds) $l-- -- - I u ('( lTAI. (in d,IIIM •lll\IHIIIb) Percentages (Corporation% t Mah.:h% "' 1110%) ____ __ '}'!!_ + + l--~ -- _____"/'! _ :::: :::: l -- Hill% --- ·- - I ��ASSURANCES All recipients of Federal funding are required to assure that the recipient: • Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project costs) to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project described in this application. • Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. • Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their position for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. • Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. • Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 CFR 900, Subpart F). • Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683), and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination ·on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability; (d) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) The Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (0 The Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290dd-3 and 290ee-3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drub abuse patient records; (h) Title vm of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the National and Community Service Act of 1990, as amended; and G) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. · • Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Tide II and mof the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced cr whose property is acquired as a result of Federal cr Federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real propeny acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. 28 ��• Will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.D. 1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political -activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. • Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a and 276a-77), the Copeland Act (40 U.S .C. 276c and 18 U.S.C. 874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327-333), regarding labor standards for Federally assisted construction sub-agreements. • Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the F1ood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires the recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more. • Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in flood plains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved state management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93-523); and (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93-205). • Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. • Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470),EO 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469a-1 et seq.). • Will comply with P .L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance. • Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (PL. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance. • Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. • Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984 or OMB Circular A-133, Audits of Institutions of Higher Learning and other Non-profit institutions. • Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies governing this program. 29 ��In addition, all .recipients of Corporation assistance under this application are required to assure that the recipient • Will keep such records and provide such information to the Corporation with respect to the program as may be required for fiscal audits and program evaluation. • Will not use the assistance to replace State and local funding streams that had been used to support programs of the type eligible to receive Corporation support. For any given program, this condition will be satisfied if the aggregate non-Federal expenditure for that program in the fiscal year that support is to be provided is not less than the previous fiscal year. • Will use the assistance only for a program that does not duplicate, and is in addition to, an activity otherwise available in the locality of the program. • Will comply with the Notice, Hearing, and Grievance Procedures found in § 176 of the Act • Will comply with the nondisplacement rules found in§ 177(b) of the Act Specifically, an employer shall not displace an employee or position, including partial displacement such as reduction in hours, wages, or employment benefits, as a result of the employer using an AmeriCorps participant; a service opportunity shall not be created that will infringe on the promotional opportunity of an employed individual; an AmeriCorps participant shall not perform any services or duties or engage in activities that (1) would otherwise be performed by an employee as part of the employee's assigned duties, (2) will supplant the hiring of employed workers, (3) are services or duties with respect to which an individual has recall rights pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement or applicable personnel procedures; or (4) have been performed by or were assigned to any presently employed worker, an employee who recently is on leave, an employee who is on strike ar is being locked out, or an employee who is subject to a reduction in force or has recall rights subject to a collective bargaining agreement or applicable personnel procedure. Assurances • Sienature By signing this assurances·page, the applicant certifies that it will agree to perform all actions and support all intentions stated in the attached Assurances. NOTE: This form must be signed and included in the application. ~g~tionN~-----------------------------------------------ProjectN~---------------------------------------------------N~ and Title of Authorized Representative________________________ Signanue________________________________________~------------Date__________________________________________________________ 30 ��CERTIFICATION INSTRUCTIONS By signing the Certification Signature Page, the applicant certified that it will agree to perform all actions and support all intentions stated in the Certification sections of this application. Signing the Certification Page 1. Inability to Certify. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of a grant The applicant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the Corporation determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the applicant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such applicant for a grant. 2. Erroneous Certification. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the Corporation determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the applicant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the Corporation may terminate this transaction for cause or default 3. Notice of Error in Certification. The applicant shall provide immediate written notice to the Corporation to whom this proposal is submitted if at any time the applicant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. Definitions. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "lower tier covered transaction," "participant," "person," "primarily covered transaction," "principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of the rules implementing Executive Order 12549. An applicant shall be considered a "prospective primary participant in a covered transaction" as defmed in the rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the Corporation for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. S• Certification Requirement for Subgrant Agreements. The applicant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the Corporation. 6. Certification Inclusion in Subgrant Agreements. The applicant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transactions," provided by the Corporation, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 7• Certification of Subgrant Principals. A grantee may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower-tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A grantee may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each grantee may, but is not required to, check the · Nonprocurement List. 31 ��8. Prudent Person Standard. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and infonnation of a grantee is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9• Non-Certification in Subgrant Agreements. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a grantee knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default Certifications Before completing certification, please reading Certification Instructions. Certification - Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters. This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debannent and Suspension, 34 CFR Part 85, Section 85.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part Vll of the May 26, 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211). A. B. The applicant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: • Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency, • Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain. or performing a public (Federal, State or local)transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property, • Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1) (b) of this certification, and • Have not within a three-year period pieceding this application proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State <r local) tmninated for cause or default; Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such applicant shall attach an explanation to this application. Certification. Drug-Free Workplace. This certification is required by the regulations implementing the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988,34 CFR Part 85, Subpart F. The regulations, published in the January 31, 1989 Federal Register, require certification of grantees, prior to award, that they will maintain a drug-free workplace. The certification set out below is a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the agency determines to award the grant False certification or violation of the certification shall be grounds for suspension of payments, suspension or termination of grants, or government-wide suspension or debarment (see 34 CFR Part 85, Section 85:615 and 85.620). 32 ��The grantee certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by: A. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; B. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about• the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, • the grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, • any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and • the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace. C. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (1). D. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (1) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will • abide by the terms of the statement, and • notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occwring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction. E. Notifying the Corporation with 10 days after receiving notice under subparagraph (4)(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. F. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (4)(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted• Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination; or • Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency. G. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6). Certification - Lobbying Activities As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code, the applicant certifies that: A. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Fedcnl contract, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement B. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid ot will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of 33 ��Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form ~. "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. C. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subcontracts at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Certification - Sienature Before you Start. Before completing certification, please read Certification Instructions. NOTE: This form must be signed and included in the application. Signature. By signing this Certification page, the applicant certifies that it will agree to perform all actions and support all intentions stated in the Certification sections in Part ill of this application. The three Certifications are: • Certification: Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters • Certification: Drug-Free Workplace • Certification: Lobbying Activities Organization Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Project Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Name and Tide of Authorized Representative: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Signature: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 34 ��Application Materials for Michigan AmeriCorps Programs MARCH 1-t. 199-t t :PDATE Application Deadline: April 15, 1994 Michigan Community Service Commission Olds Plaza Building • 111 S. Capitol Ave. • Lansing, MI 48906 • (517-335-4295) ��AmeriCorps Request for- Proposal Update Information The Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) has taken upon itself to provided information as it becomes available. One of the perils of such a comminnent is that more and more information becomes available almost weekly. Therefore, the following information is being provided as an update to Michigan's potential applicants for AmeriCorps funding. Where possible, the additions are referenced to the appropriate section in the original AmeriCorps Request For Proposal. Please understand that we will send more information as it becomes available. XVIll Application Guidelines (page 20) (b) Proeram Desi~n Participant training and support Programs need to build transportation and lodging costs into their budget for participant training at both the local and state levels. Vlli Eligibility, Recruitment and Selection Terms of Service Part-time participants may complete their term(s) of service in any hour combination so long as they complete 900 hours within two or three years. Those participants IWt enrolled in an institution of higher education must complete their 900 hours within two years. XIV Budget and Grant Requirements Administrative Costs The MCSC and the Corporation for National and Community Service will allow administrative costs, but those costs shall not exceed 5%. This is a revision from the 2.6% cap in the initial RFP. Fee for Service Programs are allowed to use fee for service revenues collected from non-federal sources for all cash or in-.kind matches specified in the Michigan AmeriCorps RFP. Education Awards Only Grants (page 22) Education Awards Only Grants have all the same program requirements as operating grants. The purpose of these awards is to provide national service educational awards to programs that do not apply for operating grants but that do meet the AmeriCorps program requirements and are judged to be high quality according to the program criteria. Applicants requesting Education Awards Only Grants must provide all the information required of the operating grants. However, the budget request will solicit only education awards and not other operational funds from the Corporation. No match requirement exist for the educational awards. revised March 14, 1994 ��Health Care benefits for full-time participants. A full-time participant is eliaible for health care benefits if he or she is not othe["INise covered by a health care policy= providing minimum benefits established by the Corporation at the time he or she is accepted into a program. If. as a result of participation. or if. during the term of service. a panicipant demonstrates loss of coverage through no deliberate act of his or her own. such as parental or spoasal job loss or disqualification from Medicaid. the participant will be eligible for health care benefits. Background. For the first program year the Corporation has set the Minimum Benefits. described below, that programs with existing health benefit coverage must meet or exceed. The Minimum Benefits are lower than the benefits that the Corporation considers desirable for eligible participants. The Minimum Benefits were adopted in consideration of the multiplicity of current health care policies and the frequent requirement that they be used for all participants or members of an organization. To encourage the use of more suitable coverage. the Corporation will facilitate access to a policy designed for AmeriCorps participants. It is the intent of the Corporation to develop a uniform health care policy for the second program year that provides more generous benefits than the Minimum Benefits described below. Requirements. Grantees must provide health benefit coverage for eligible participants in accord with the following: (1) Programs with existing health benefit policies that meet the minimum benefits may: use their current health care coverage. or choose the Alternative Health Care Policy; and (2) Programs that do not have health care coverage or have coverage that does not meet the Minimum Benefits described below must use the Alternative Health Care Policy unless granted an exception by the Corporation. Minimum benefits. The following minimum benefits must be provided or exceeded for programs with existing health benefit coverage: Covered Services: physician services for illness or injury hospital room and board emergency room x-ray and laboratory prescription drugs Lirnjted Coverage mental/nervous substance abuse Annual Limits Deductible Coinsurance Not more than $250 per individual Participant pays not more than 20% or alternatively, a comparable fixed fee Exception: mental and substance abuse at 50% Not more than $1.000 per individual At least $50.000 Out-of-pocket Maximum Benefit Programs electing to use current health benefi~ that mee~ the abo.ve ~inimum. benefit requirements will be required at time of selecuon to provtde specific mformauon on the benefits and policy. Alternative health care policy. Organizations that meet the criteria in (A)(2) or (B) ~b~ve are to budget $1.200 in Section F. Alternative ~~alth .car~. ~f the budget ~or each ehgtble participant. If the fair market value of th.e _PartlCtpant s ~~lSUng cove~ge lS les.s th~ ~or a policy tha~ 1s designed for ArneriCorps participants. Information about that policy w11l be made ava..llable by the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. $1.200. a program may consider the paructpant to be eh¥1ble • I Federal share. The Corporation will pay 85% of the c~st ?fa policy that ~eets the requirements defmed above and are and are not excessive m cost as dete~med by the Corporation. The Corporation will not pay any share of the cost of the policy that does not include the Minimum Benefits. ��Administrative costs. Nut more than 5% of the grant amount may be used to pay for administrative costs. [State Commissions are directly funded for their administrative activities, which include program oversight, and are eligibk to receive up to $100,000 for Program -Development Assistance and Training. Thus, States are encouraged to provide the fullS% of CorporatWn funding for Administrative Costs to the operating AmeriCorps programs. In no case should the State Commissum retain more than 1% of the Administrative Cost associated with a CorporatWn funded program. Exceptions to this may be approved by the Corporation on a case-by-case basis ifjusti}Ud.j Administrative costs are expenses associated with the overall administration of a Corporation funded program. These costs relate to the support of a program's general operations and not to expenses identified with a specific program or project. Administrative costs include the following: (1) indirect costs (i.e.. costs such as legal staff. central management and support functions that are not specifically assigned to projects on an hourly or use basis but are accumulated as a whole and proportionately spread across projects usually as a percentage of the project costs) as described in the Office of Management and Budget circulars A-21 (Cost Principles for Educational Institutions). A-87 (Cost Principles for State and Local Governments). and A-122 (Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations) that relate to indirect costs; (2) costs for financial. accounting, auditing, internal evaluations (except as in the unallowable costs described below), and contracting functions; (3) costs for insurance that protects the entity that operates the program; and (4) the portion of the salaries and benefits of the director and any other program administrative staff equal to the portion of time that is not spent in suppon of specific project objectives. meaning recruiting, training, placing, or supervising participants. Administrative costs do not include -allowable costs directly related to program or project operations. such as: ( 1) costs for participants, including living allowances. insurance payments. and expense for training and travel; (2) costs for staff who recruit, train. place. or supervise participants; (e.g. salaries and benefits expenses and training and travel expenses if the purpose is for a specific program or project objective training; and (3) costs for independent evaluations and internal evaluations·- the latter to the extent that the evaluations cover only the funded program or project and are specifically related to creative methods of quality improvement. (Overall organizational management improvement costs are administrative costs.) Particular cosrs. such as those associated with staff who perfonn both administrative and program functions, may be prorated between administrative and program costs if included in the budget and approved by the Corporation grants officer. ��. AMERICORPS PROGRAM-STATE BUDGET FORM INSTRUCTIONS Applicants for Americorps programs must submit both a Budget Form and Budget Narrative detailing the amount requested. Item A Participant Support Cost Costs identified on the form that relate directly to the program participant. Item B Staff Cost Costs of the staff that are directly involved in the AmeriCorps Program. Item C Operational Cost Costs that relate directly to the AmeriCorps Program. Item D Evaluation Cost Costs requested in addition to any cost that may be included above in "Staff" to conduct program evaluation. Item E Administration Cost Costs associated with the operation and management of the organization. This would include indirect cost. Note that the administration cost shall not exceed 5% of Corporation funds . If personnel, equipment, or other resources are shared between the proposed program and unrelated programs the cost should be prorated and documented. Item F Other Participant Support Costs On the first line, state the participant living allowance, which includes the participants' share of FICA. On the second line. include the organization's share of FICA and Worker's Compensation if applicable. Item G Child Care Program should use its best estimate on the number of eligible participants and children. Item H Educational Awards Self-Explanatory ��Applicant Name: Program Name: Corporation Share !CNCSl Funds Requested + from the Corporation A. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTS Grantee Share Other Federal / State / Local / Private Funds Iml = Total Program Funding Training and Education Uniforms Other ' •'" " ' 5P'f't_fy ' " Baulgtt Nor-rollrtl Subtotal Salaries Benefits Training Other B. STAFF tplrast sptcl_fy 1n Bwdgtt Narro ii ~J Subtotal C. OPERATIONAL Travel Transportation f rnc lud.t ~IOCJJlu:m J Supplies Equipment Other tplrost •ptetfy ' " B•dgn Nomll-1 Subtotal D. ~RNAL EVALUATION / MONITORWG E. ADMINISTRATION (IIIIZY rwt ccurd 5% of Corp. furuis , A·FJ = + Percentages tC.rporottorl IM%. i S,-, • G"'"t« "'""· 25% • 100'%1 % -------- + % = 100% ��C2022ratl!lD Sbuc • ma .~ :!5', ~umber of Pamq ~i.(]ts . F. !:i[iJl!s:s: Sbu~: 1mm l5' 'ol IlUi1 l00°'o Living OTHER Allowance PARTI CIP..<\NT SUPPORT COSTS FICA and Workers' Compens_a tion Health Care• Alternative Health Care•• !5 1.200 pi!T eligtblt parttapan tsJ TOTAL (f) TOTAL (A-F) Estimated II of !:hildtcll Estimated II of Eljpblc PuticipiJlts I+I I=I II I I !:all21Uitian Sbi[S: (max. 100%) !:i[iJllS:C ShitC G. CHILOCARE TOTAL (A-G) I I Amount per Pvtidpmt Number of Pvticipmts H. EDUCATION AWARDS Full-T!.me Participants $4725 _ x _____ Part-Tune Participants X $2363 ------ TOTAL (H) • [f grantee IS I I utilizmg current policy meeting minimum benefits for elig1ble pdrtiC1pa nts. •• [f grantee is utilizmg alternative health care policy to be made available. = ��AMERICORPS PROGRAM BUDGET NARRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS For each of the line items contained on the Budget Form, a full narrative explanation must be provided to show how the cost was calculated. For example, the narrative for living allowance should show the number of participants, the rate of the living allowance, and the total cost. Where estimates are used to arrive at a cost, the narrative should so indicate (e.g., travel should show for each trip the number of travelers, purpose, destination when known, and the estimated cost). Administrative costs should be broken down to show the amount being retained by the state and the amount going to the individual program. Equipment must contain a list of all "items" costing in excess of $1,000. The "other" line item should show each of the cost categories that make up the line item and a narrative for each cost category indicating how the cost was calculated. The narrative must be completed both for funds requested from the corporation and for other Federal/State/Local / Private funds. ��RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS States must also ensure that a minimum of 50 percent of Corporation assistance will be used for programs that operate in legislated areas of need and that place a priority on recruiting panicipants who are residents in high need areas, which include: • • • • • Communities designated by the Federal government of States as empowennent zones or redevelopment areas, targeted for specific economic incentives. or otherwise identifiable as having high concentrations on low-income people; Areas that are environmentally distressed; Areas adversely affected by Federal actions related to the management of Federal lands that result in significant regional job losses and economic dislocation; Areas adversely affected by reduction in Defense spending or the closure or realignment of military installations; and Areas the have unemployment rates greater than the national average unemployment for the most recent 12 months for which satisfactory data are available. �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_MI-AmeriCorps-Programs-Application Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting AmeriCorps Programs application Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting AmeriCorps Programs application. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49607 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/1305e4be2858830e6b008301131314d5.pdf 267cea54d69a2758303d74609827ad1e PDF Text Text STATE OF MICHIGAN APPLICATION FOR STATE COMMISSIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNDING THE CORPORATION ON NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Submitted by tbe MICffiGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION �Title Page Application from the State of_ _....~M~.~.~.I....C:.~..~HLL:IIGIC,r;A;;uN.L......_ _ _ _ _ _ __ m1 0 0 State Commission Alternative Administrative Entity (AAE) Transitional Entity (TE) Address of State Commission, AAE, or TE l...eQII' Erdy Name MICHIGAN CQMMLt,!UY SERVICE CCJ,1M!SS!OO DIANA ALGBA. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 111 S, CAPITO. a.DS aAZA 61 00, fCUUH fLCX)fJ ~ Cortaa Person's ~ an::t Tile hitess Cly, SlaM,~ Phone 1 Fax LANSN3. Ml 48909 c51 n m 4295 FAX C51 n 37'J.§n Address of Fiscal Agent, If different from above Ma FAFNEB Other Key State Contact8 In operating or eatabllahlng State Comml•lon or AAE: 1, Name T!Ue Telephone Number 2, Name Organization Telephone Number Name Organization Telephone Number Name Organization Telephone Number 3, 4, Certification This appUcation Is submlted for approval of eligl)illty to apply for CorporatiOn fundi. If approvaJ of use of a Transitional Entity is being eought In this application, the State hereby commits to establishing a State oommisslon or Alternative Adrnnistrattve Ently, Signature of the Governor Prr.edName Date �STATE OF MICHIGAN APPLICATION FOR STATE COMMISSIONS FOR ADMINJSIRATIYE FUNDING THE CORPORATION ON NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Submitted by the MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION �Title Page Application from the State of_ _--=M=I:....;:.C;.:...:H:.:..;:~IG~:.:.A..:.:.N..:....-_ _ _ _ _ _ __ ill State Commission 0 Alternative Administrative Entity (AAE) 0 Transitional Entity (TE) Address of State Commission, AAE, or TE Legal Erdy Name MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CC!r1M!SS!OO ~ Coriad Person's Name ard T1Se DIANA ALGBA EXEClJTJVE DIRECTOR .Adiess Cly, SIE, ~ Phone I Fax CAPITOL OlDS PLAZA BLDG, fOURTH fLCX)8 111 s L,NiSING. Ml 48909 151'D 335-4295 FAX 151n 373-4QV Address of Fiscal Agent, If different from above ~kab~~~--~M~~~~~~~~~OOM~Mu§SON~~-----------------------­ OYmd~~~Mua~E~AAM~~EB~--------------------------------­ ~ --•~~~~WKMH~~~~~sau~~AB~E------------------------- cay, Sale.~ VJCIPB OFFJCE CENTER ---LANSNl;;aa.iaDIIII..JMIIM,;&-..1oi!L3________________________________ Ruw/~~~'5~1wnu~~~~--------------------------------Other Key State Contacts In operating or establishing State Commission or AAE: 1, Name Trtle Organization Telephone Number Name Trtle Organization Telephone Number Name Title Organization Telephone Number Name Tltle Organization Telephone Number 2, 3, 4, Certification This application is submitted for approval of eligibility to apply for Corporation funds. If approvaJ of use of a Transitional Entity is being sought in this application, the State hereby commits to establishing a State commission or Alternative Admnistrative Entity. Signature of the Governor Printed Name Date �State Commission/AAE Composition Approval Form (To be SlbT1itted when~ and specific nurrbers a the State Commission or AAE. have been identified) State of CiJ 0 Mjchjgan State Commission Alternative Administrative Entity Number of voting members __2_5_ _ __ List below the names, titles, and a brief description of background of the State Commission or AAE members. A member may represent none, one, or more than one of the categories, however each of the required categories must be represented. In addition, please attach a description of how the State Commission or AAE will perform each of the duties described in §2550.70 (a)-(1) of the regulations. Required Voting Members 1. a representative of a community-based agency or organization in the State Victor Begg is president of the Muslim American Alliance. 2. the head of the State education agency or his or her designee Dr. Robert Schiller is the Superintendent of Public Instruction for the State. 3. a representative of local governments in the State The local government representative is still pending. 4. a representative of local labor organizations in the State Henry Gaines serves as the Employee Assistance Representative and Coordi nator for Local 599 UAW. 5. a representative of business Lisa Illitch Murray is Vice President of Corporate Communications and Nati onal Training for Little Caesar's Enterprise, Inc. 6.. an individual between the ages of 16 and 25 who is a participant or supervisor of a serv1ce program for youth, or of a campus-based or national service program Sarah Riley is currently involved \'lith the Mount Pleasant Youth Action Forum and is a senior at Mt. Pleasant High School. �Category met (cont'd) 7. Name of member, Title, and Brief Description of Background (cont'd) a representative of a national service program A representative of a national program is pending. 8. an individual with expertise in the educational, training, and development needs of youth, particularly disadvantaged youth Sister Mary Martinez is the director of the Office of Multi-Cultural Affairs at Madonna University. 9. an individual with experience in promoting the involvement of adults (as defined in the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.) in service and voluntarism A representative of adult programs is pending. Additional voting members (please list category, name, title, and brief description of background) 10. educators, including representatives from institutions of higher education and local agencies: Randy Neelis is the Superintendent of Menominee Public Schools. 11. experts in the delivery of human, educational, environmental, or public safety services to communities and persons: Beverly Drake is the Director of the Area Community Service Employment and Training Council of Kent County. 12. educators, including representatives from institutions of higher education and local agencies: Mary Ellen Brandell is associate Dean for the College of Education, Health and Human Services at Central Michigan University. 13. an individual between the ages of 16 and 25 who is a participant or supervisor of a service program for youth, or of a campus-based or national service program: Terry Langston is a graduate student at Michigan State University. 14. a representative from a foundation in the state: Joel Orosz is Coordinator and program Director of Philanthropy and Volunteerism at the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. .· �Category met (cont'd) Name of member, Title, and Brfef Description of Background (cont'd) 15. a representative from foundations in the State: Dorothy Johnson is President of the Council of Michigan Foundations. 16. an individual with expertise in the educational, training, and developmen t needs of youth, particularly disadvantaged youth: Michael J. Tate serves as the Assistant Director of Extension for Governmental Relations at Michigan State University. 17. a representative of business: Judith Dunn is a small business owner. 18. a representative of a corrmuni ty foundation: Terry Pruitt, Jr. is the Senior Product Market Specialist with Dow Cornin g Corporation. 19. a representative of a community-based agency or organization in the State : Geneva Jones Williams is President of United Corrmunity Ser,vices of Detroi t . 20. 21. representatives of programs that are administered or receive assistance under the Domestic Volunteer Service Act, such as VISTA, Senior Companions, Ret i red Senior Volunteer, or Foster Grandparent programs: Vernie Nethercut is Director of the Alpena Volunteer Center at Alpena Community College. a representative from foundations in the state: Jon Blyth is Program Officer of the Charles Stewart Matt Foundation. 22. chairperson of the MCSC: Michelle Engler is an attorney and the First Lady of Michigan. 23. a representative of business: Julie Cummings works as a consultant who specializes in development and fundraising. �Category met (cont'd) Name of member, Title, and Brief Description of Background (cont'd) representative of Indian Tribes: 24. 25. A member representing an Indian Tribe is pending. representative of physically challenged population or other: A member representing physically challenged populations or other s i s pend i ng. Ex Officio, Non-Voting Members (please list name and title) 1. Department of Social Services - Gerald Miller, Director 2. Michigan Jobs Commission - Douglas Stites, V.P. Office for Workplace Development 3. Michigan Caropus Compact - Julie Busch, Executive Director 4. Michigan Non-Profit Forum - Dave Egner, Executive Director 5. ACTION - Stan Stewart, Interim Representative to the Corporation 6. 7. 8. 9. �A. PROPOSAL 1. STRUCTURE A. The Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) has been in existence since October of 1991 when it was established via executive order by Governor John Engler. The 21 commission members represent a broad-based constituency dedicated to the concept of community service and the building of private/public coalitions to effectively meet local needs. The ethnically and geographically diverse members of the MCSC represent community-based organizations, colleges, K-12 schools, young people, labor groups, small businesses, corporations, and philanthropic institutions. Commissioners are appointed for renewable, staggered 3-year terms. On December 9, 1993, Governor John Engler, by Executive Order rescinded the original Executive Order that created the first State Commission and issued a new one to expand the Commissions voting membership from 21 to 25 and to conform to the specific requirements of the 1993 National and Community Service Trust Act (see Appendix B- Executive Order No. 1993-24) B. The Govem<r' s appointments staff is working with the Executive Director of the Commission to fill the remaining vacancies as required in the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993 (see State Commission/ME Composition Approval Form). C. Descriptions of recommended voting members See fcrms included D. Any consideration for appointing ex-officio, non-voting members of the Commission/AAE See fcrms included E. Balance with respect to race, ethnicity, age, gender, disability characteristics and political affiliation will be ensured through several processes including the Governor's appointment review ~ a new executive order and the use of a political affiliation form. F. Since Michigan has had a functioning commission since 1991, the enclosed timeline deals more with the development of the State plan. G. The MCSC will delegate the contract and grant administrations functions to the Bureau of Contract and Grants Management within the Michigan Jobs Commission. Fiscal management will be delegated to the Michigan Department of Labor. An outside contracUr will be retained to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of the subgrants distributed through the MCSC. MCSC is currently housed within the Michigan Jobs Commission - an entity designed to promote and establish positive opportunities for job growth in Michigan. Michigan Community Service Commission Page 1 �2. DUTIES A. Michigan's Comprehensive Plan The MCSC will develop community service initiatives in Michigan by building on the basic principles that have driven its work thus far. These principles, collaboration, outreach. State suppat, and infrastructure building are at the heart of any action taken by the MCSC. The following are the mechanisms to be developed as well as those currently being used that make up Michigan's Comprehensive Plan. Community Forums Michigan has had a long history of service initiative building and collaboration. Part of MCSC' s responsibility to the State of Michigan is to pool and direct Michigan's people, money and technical assistance to aid communities in addressing the pressing needs they identify. MCSC believes in empowering communities. Local communities are in the best position to identify, address and solve the problems in their own "back yards." MCSC believes it should provide the resources, training and technical assistance necessary to empower communities to help others. In sync with this philosophical belief, MCSC's focus has been, and will be to convene community forums that: • • • • help communities either find existing Deeds assessments of their population <r hdp them facilitate their own. collect general information on the State's needs as a whole. educate key fXCDmunity service leaders and participants on the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. inform communities on the possibilities of AmeriCorps projects. The community forums will be executed through the use of satellite down-linking to over a dozen sites across Michigan (see Appendix C- Geographic Distribution of 1992-1994 CNCS Grantees in Michigan and Location of Focus Groups). Partnerships with community service netwolts throughout the state will be utilized to bring together potentially inte:rWed community leaders and community senice members. MCSC will take advantage mall its resources to facilitate the forums including its most vital resource - commmity leaders and the Commissioners. Community forums will be partnership amngements between MCSC and local community leadership. MCSC will act as the convener of these forums, but plans for local community leadership to fadliane bringing important parties to the table. Commissioners of the MCSC represent a troad range of geographic regions, professions and service arenas to provide MCSC with guidance and leadenhip. The Commissioners will be called upon for that same leadership and guidance to bring leadership in service organizations to the community fonims. Commissioners will be asked to attend the community forums to provide a sense of validity and commitment on the part of the MCSC to addressing Michigan's needs through community service. Michigan Community Service Commission Page 2 ~-· �These partnerships have formed to develop a steering committee. The responsibility of the committee is to aid in the ''visioning" of a plan for Michigan to respond to the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993 and to provide guidance for the community forums. The committee members represent diverse perspectives in community service including: 4H extension service, higher education, community action agencies, community foundations, local United Ways, and voluntary action centers. Collaboration The work and philosophy of the MCSC is grounded in the belief that inclusiveness and collaboration are key to partnership-building and community buy-in. Building upon what the MCSC has done in the past. and continuing with its emphasis on collaboration throughout its work, grantees are, and will continue to be, encouraged to engage in outreach to other organizations that could help in meeting needs through community service initiatives. MCSC continually seeks the input of key players in Michigan's community service arena for resource sharing, idea generation, guidance and focus. Michigan's community service organizations have, and also have had. a strong shared commitment to incorp<nting Service Learning in community service initiatives. MCSC has played a key role in the strategic planning of a Service Learning infusion program. In cooperation with the Michigan Campus Compact, American Youth Foundation and the K-12 Service Learning Center, the MCSC has established the Michigan Principles for Service (see Appendix D- The Michigan Principles fcr Service). MCSC has, in collaboration with other stakeholders, created a list of community service pricrities for Michigan called the Michigan Vision. The Michigan Vision is the foundation for MCSC and its decision making and was developed through the collaborative efforts of representatives from foundations, corpcntions. higher education institutions, and several community service organizations. MCSC has had a long history of collaboration and partnership building. When the MCSC was awuded a planning grant from the Commission on National and Community Service in the area of national and community sc:rvice programs (subtitle D), a working group was formed to help direct the MCSC toward implementation of the Michigan CARES initiative. This group consists of members representing community foundations. higher education, non-profits, and the Michigan United Way, Department of Education, Office on Aging, AcriON, 4H Extension, Points of Light FOUJKh¢oo. MCSC will continue its focus on collaboration by requiring that its grantees work with community agencies to secure additional funding, exchange information, and explore new possibilities for partnership building. Michigan Community Service Commission Page 3 �Outreach Making sure that communities are "in the loop," MCSC utilizes several mechanisms to perfmn outreach. Updated mailings have been sent to keep ''players" informed on the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. Approximately 1000 "Dear Colleague" letters were sent to the State Commission's entire mailing list of over 600 listings to inform the public on the AmeriCorps program and the related federal legislation. This outreach included a form that asked for more names and addresses of interested parties. MCSC is also fortunate in that Michigan is one of nine states with a Point of Light Foundation Youth Engaged in Service (YES) Ambassador. Outreach to youth is the one task.of the YES Ambassador. To that end. the Michigan Youth Progressive Action Council (MYPAC) has been established to engage youth in the service movement and solicit youth voice. The Points of Light Ambassador performs outreach to more than youth. MCSC has gone to great lengths to utilize his talents to promote service learning, represent the State in the national service arena and aid communities in begining service initiatives. MCSC facilitates and hosts an annual all grantees meeting as well as meetings by subtitle. These meetings provide opportunities to obtain feedback from the grantees and offcn time to engage in reflective activities. Additionally, much of the training for evaluation and granting procedures is performed at these meetings. State Support and Commissioa Lonaevity Besides being created by Govemcr John Engler, the State of Michigan bas supported the MCSC with over $150,000 in general fund monies plus suppon in the form of inkind contributions for each of the past two years. The Governor bas further shown his strong suppon for community service by appointing Michigan's First Lady, Michelle Engler as Olairperson of the Commission. MCSC bad already begun the process of seeking a permanent statutory authorization to ensure its longevity when the National and Community Stzvice Trust Act of 1993 was enacted Governor Engler bas taken a leadership role in establishing avenues for guaranteeing the future of the Commission by gathering bi-partisan suppon from the Michigan Legislature. Legislatioo has now been drafted with strong suppon from both swe houses and will be introduced some time in early 1994. This legislation is constructed in such a way as to ensure that MCSC' s structure and operation will be in compliance with the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. MCSC sees the need for looking to other sources for suppat to ensure the Commission's longevity. MCSC has taken Several steps to secure a stable and solid future for the Commission. The MCSC has established a..standing committee on fund development to secure state and private funding. MCSC bas established an avenue to other arenas of collabc:ntion and support by appointing the Executive Director as a private sector liaison. Michigan Community Service Commission ,;_. Page 4 �Infrastructure Building MCSC will further the strength of Michigan's service infrastructure by worlcing closely with Michigan's philanthropic foundations (i.e. the Charles Stewan Mott Foundation and the W. K. Kellogg Foundation) Michigan has established a Council of Michigan Foundations to act as a coordinating body in the community foundation arena. MCSC will also work closely with the existing service infrastructures to utilize existing networlcs, communicate vital information, perform outreach, and offer support to needy communities and community-based organizations. Sevc:ral initiatives have been enacted to support and strengthen Michigan's service infrastructure: • through partnerships designed to establish a common language and belief in service learning, the American Youth Foundation, Michigan Campus Compact, the K-12 Service Learning Center and the MCSC have developed a task force that will develop a plan for the incorporation of service learning components throughout state service and education fields. • with help from the Commission on National and Community Service in the form of a planning grant, Michigan CARES will help communities serve by building community-based and driven service infrastructures. A work group has been assembled with representation from the Michigan Campus Compact, 4H Extension, the Council of Michigan Foundations, ACI10N, Michigan United Way, Michigan Non-Profit Forum, youth corps progr&lllSy and Points of Light Youth Engaged in Service (YES) Ambassador. • Michigan has created the Michigan Steering Committee on the National Service Trust Act of 1993 to help facilitate the solicitation of citizen input, formulate a stralegic plan fer the State and perfcrm outreach functions on behalf of the MCSC. The committee represents a variety of members from the different streams of service in Michigan and wcrks in conjuction with the Michigan Community Service Commission to assist the MCSC in developing and implementing its vision. The Michigan Steering Committee on the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993 is a partnership of a wide spectrum of service networks including: Michigan Campus Compact, 4H Extension, the Council of Michigan Foundations, ACI10N, Michigan United Way, Michigan Non-Profit Forum. youth.corps programs. Points of Ught Youth Engaged in Service (YES) Ambassacb', Michigan Department of Education, Michigan Developmental Disabilities Council, and the Office on Aging. These partnerships are real commitments given by community service organizations and are not mere rubber stamping positions. The representatives are asked to perform specific tasks and give concrete and specific information as needed. MCSC believes that the vision for Michigan •s community service should be constructed with input from as broad a constituency as possible. This broad-based support should pave the way for stronger program development, greater commitment by the field to Michigan's vision for community service and establish a strong service network. Michigan Community Service Commission Page 5 �Action All of these mechanisms will be utilized to enact Michigan's Comprehensive Plan. The timeline (see Appendix E - Tuneline for State Plan I AmeriCorps) will funher explain the various elements Michigan will employ to create an overall vision for the three-year-life of the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. B. The pre-selection process for Subtitle C programs will be as follows: On February 23, 1994, the MCSC, in cooperation with the 4H Extension Service, will conduct a community forum utilizing satellite telecommunications. This will offer MCSC an opponunity to conduct outreach and informal needs assessment This will also be an opportunity for technical assistance to those interested in AmeriCorps. Data will be collected and recaded for analysis to determine Michigan's specific need(s). All areas of AmeriCorps funding will be represented at the State level at the forums (i.e. K-12 Education, Higher Education, State Commission, etc.) On March 1 and 2, 1994, MCSC will hold two technical assistance meetings regarding the State's RFP process for AmeriCorps. An additional technical assistance session is planned for March 8, 1994 designed to aid those submitting Learn and Serve CBO applications in producing the best possible proposals. Potential grantees will be encouraged to answer some general questions. These questions will provide a checklist for community leaders to ensure the best quality proposals. Questions will include the following: • • • • • • Is there a collatxntive partnership identified in your proposal? Do you have a fiscal agent in your partnership? What amount and type of funding have you secured outside of the funding requested through AmeriCorps'l How have you included youth voice? How will you incaporate Service Learning? What basic technical assistance structure will you develop for participants and host sites? The MCSC will establish a peer review panel process including commissioners and youth representitives to review the proposals and select the programs that have adequately answered the questioos above. Those programs selected will be required to take part in a mandatmy technical assistance meeting where a final request fer grant proposal will be offered IDd explained At oo point are those submitting proposals and BLUpted required to submit a final proposal should they find that the burden is too heavy <r some unforeseen circumaaDces occur. MCSC will make every effon to explain the RFP evaluation criteria to community forum participants as fedc:ral regulations become public and finaliud. Michigan Community Service Commission Page 6 .. ~ �To date, it is known that those submitting proposals should offer proposals that demonstrate a strong commitment toward: • • • • • • • developing a strong organization. htUding excellent service projects. ensuring the incorpa"ation of a comprehensive evaluation process that allows grantees to learn from their results. offering a high quality participant experience with an emphasis on thorough participant preparation and suppon. building community partnerships. incorporating people from diverse populations. developing programs with high standards for and in-depth thought toward quality (CNCS will weigh 70% of its decision in this area), need (CNCS will weigh 10% of its decision in this area). sustainability (CNCS will weigh 10% of its decision in this area). and innovation and replication (CNCS will weigh 10% of its decision in this area). Certain special considerations will be given by CNCS to programs that have been funded under the National and Community Service Act of 1991. This is IWl a guarantee. but a promise toward understanding the need for continuation funding to successful programs previously funded under this rubric. Massive suppon mechanisms will need to be developed in <X'der to achieve these ends. The MCSC request financial suppon from the CNCS for: • • • • meetings to bring community 1~ Commissioners and standing committees of the Commission together to shape Michigan's emphasis for community service. in-state government services fer grant administration, finance processes and K-12 educatioo cocxdination. additional staffing to handle communication and public relations. outreach and technical assistance to current and possible future grantees and advocating the youth and promoting youth voice at all levels of decision making in the community service uena. additional suppon staff. equipment and operating costs for supplementary personnel. C. See B D. Administration of grants proaram will be as follows: The MCSC bas been funded in five of the subtitles of the National Community Service Act of 1991 and has extensive experience in the administration of community service grants. The MCSC is housed within the Michigan Jobs Commission and utilizes the administrative personnel for contracting and grant-making. Michigan Community Service Commission Page 7 �E. Evaluation and monitoring will be conducted by an outside contractor. The MCSC is currently engaging in the RFP process to contract an evaluator for the grants under the National and Community Service Act of 1991. It is the intention of the MCSC to utilize the same procedure for the funding the the State Commission receives under the AmeriCorps rutric. This evaluation process will be utilized to evaluate not only the performance of the grantees of MCSC, but the MCSC itself. It is the hope of the MCSC that out of this process will grow a list of lessons learned and the beginnings of a new plan for operation based on those lessons. F. Tec:hniaal assistance will be provided as described in B. The MCSC will also hold its annual all grantees meetings and meetings by specific funding stream. In addition, the community forums in February will be a vehicle for technical assistance to communities. Michigan is in the unique position of being able to develop a technical assistance model through a national demonstration grant from the Commission on National and Community Service. (Michigan CARES funded under Subtitle D. of the National and Community Service Act of 1991.) Michigan CARES provides technical assistance through the use of experienced members of the Michigan community service field Michigan CARES builds Regional Technical Teams whose purpose it is to help communities throughout a given region build community service initiatives of the highest quality and with the greatest sustainability. MCSC hopes to use this model to build AmeriCorps projects throughout Michigan. The additional staff requirements mentioned above will be utilized to help facilitate the operation of this model in Michigan. . . G. Program development cannot be fully explored without knowledge of the scope and number of grant proposals. Proposals will be requin:d to include youth voice, Service LA:aming, training for sites and participants, strong financial matching support and accounting and ti.meline namuives. H. Recruitment and placement procedures will be more detailed after the CNCS has finalized its intentions. It is the intention of the MCSC to use the Michigan CARES model to develop, recruit and place AmeriCorps sites and participants. This model requires the use of community collaboratives to provide guidance; regional training teams to ensure continuity in education (service learning issues for example), and the inclusion of a community organi:ration(s) to act as a fiduciary. Three sites have been chosen for initial outreach for AmeriCorps projects: Sault Sainte Marie in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Highland Parle in the greater Detroit area. and Muskegon Heights on Michigan's west coast. These sites were chosen for their varying diversity of resources and geographic locations. Once the initial outreach is completecL these communities will work with the Michigan CARES program director to begin forming their Community Collaboratives and Regional Technical Teams. These communities will be given preferential treaanent in "the selection process for AmeriCorps funding. Page 8 Michigan Community Service Commission ~-· �Other Michigan communities developing initiatives applying for AmeriCorps funding will be encouraged to follow the Michigan CARES model when building their parmerships and suppon mechanisms. This will provide a stable structure for those submitting proposals to follow. I. Health and cbDd care will be required, but no further information can be included until the Caporation provides mae guidance in this arena. J. The MCSC is not allowed, by law, to operate or house any program funded through the National and Community Service Trust Ad ofl993. K. Recommendations to the Corporation with respect to Domestic Volunteer Service Act will be made by the MCSC. Recommendations of this type have been made in the past in collaboration with the ACTION director who serves as an ex- officio member of the MCSC. L. Coordination with other State agencies has been the cornerstone to the MCSC's existence. Constant contact has been maintained with: the Governor's Office, Michigan Department of Labor, Michigan Jobs Commission, Department of Natural Resources, the K-12 Serve - America coordinator, Michigan Department of Education, Michigan Campus Compact (Higher Education coordinat<r), Michigan Office on Aging, AcnON, various community foundations, 4H Extension Services, United Way of Michigan, Michigan Non-Profit Forum, etc. MCSC considers these organimtions partners and asks that their representatives serve in various working and advisay capacities to the MCSC. 3. stamng Executive Director - responsible for enacting the Michigan Vision and managing day-today operations of the ·Mcsc. Executive Secretary- responsible for administrative suppon for the MCSC. Staff Support Secretary - responsible for office suppon for the MCSC staff. Youth Policy Advisor - responsible for soliciting and advocating youth involvement, youth voice and the provision of training and technical assistance around youth projects (currently the Points of Light Foundation's Youth Engaged in Service Ambassador). Communications Coordinator - responsible for the general communication (input and output) and public relations strategies and mechanisms for the MCSC. This position will be phased in with the transfer of the Michigan CARES Program Director to another organization by the beginning of September of 1994. Outreach Coordinator - responsible for the technical assistance and feedback functions to grantees, interested public and service participants. Michigan Community Service Commission Page 9 �4. Technical Assistance Needs Training will be provided for staff as required by their position. Commission members will be trained through a mechanism developed through a multi-state coalition (lllinois, Kansu, Michigan, Ohio, and West Virginia) funded by the Commission on Na~onal and Community Service. This training will focus on evaluation procedures of grants, group communication and interaction skills and needs assessment activities. More development on this mechanism will be made in the near future. In addition, annual retreats will be facilitated for all members of the State Commission and youth representative body. B. Budget (see appendix A- Budget State Commissions/AAEslfEs- Year 1) Michigan Community Service Commission Page 10 �Appenci!l A Bl.DGET STATE COMMISSIONS/MEl/TEa- YEAR 1 Funding Requested From: Corporation • Other Feder.. • ToW Feder.. + State/Local/Privata $0 $115 804 $0 $37 231 $0 $153 135 $118 285 .10 $118 285 $153 135 $8,000 $8 000 $4 000 $0 $5 000 $0 $6 000 $14 000 $4 000 $0 $0 $0 $6 000 $14 000 $4,000 C. Sub-Contr.cta Sub-Oranta Other Aaancv Coata ln..tata government contr.ctlng {_La. Contr8Cta and Rnanca) $85 000 $0 $85 000 $0 $85 000 D. Other Coata IIMIInga OparaUna Coata $47 702 $17 so $0 $47 702 $17 000 $0 $58 820 $47 702 $75 620 $214 101 $42 231 $328 838 $178 805 $503,741 1883-1114 Recal Yur A. Panonnal Senior Staff Other Staff B. Travel Commlaelon llamban Staff Othara TOTAL ooo · t~ • ToW Coata ... :~ W' MCSC 93·94 Budge! Page 1 1/19/94 �BOOGET STATE COMMISSION&MEal TEa - YEAR 1 MCSC 93-94 Budget Page 1 1/ 18/94 �BUDGET STATE COMMSSIONSIAAEal TEa- YEAR 1 1111-1114 Fl.cal Year Othera Youth lnlvel lund (i.e. MYPAC grant,...._,., autHlommitliaa) 8111ttotal C. Sub-Contr.cla Sub-Grants, Other State AaenoY Coala K-12 Serve Michigan Coordinator/8.... Deol al EducaMon Financilll ' ... Servicaa Con Subtotal . .... Oft s.rw. D. Other Coata lleednaa Commiaaion Meetings - 4 c:onwiuian meelinga MYPACFocua Gloupa - Teleoonlarence to 15 ..... In 0...... - 2 meellnaa .nnulllly General Contwenoea/Renata ODeradna Coata Phone Mlliling Prinllng Sut.cripliona and publicallorw ... Copving and 4 Exec. Comm. Co~orallon +Other Federal • Total Federal $4 000 S1t,ooo $0 ss.ooo $4 000 S24 000 so $0 $4 000 S24 000 $35 000 $25,000 $25 000 . . . 000 $0 $0 $0 $35 000 $25,000 $25 000 sas,ooo $0 $0 $0 so $35 000 $25,000 $25 000 u s 000 so $2 $5 $27 $6 $3 $4 000 000 000 000 702 000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2 $5 $27 $8 $3 $4 $0 $1 500 $7 000 $0 $1 500 $0 $7 000 $0 S14 702 $321 831 $6 000 $15 000 $3 000 $500 $800 $3 000 $7 000 $23 320 SSI 820 $178,105 $2 000 $5 000 $27 000 $1000 $3 702 $4 000 $0 $1 500 _l7 000 IO l1 500 _lO e-a~-t Space (2000 square teet 0 $11 .66/IQ. ft.} Subtotal 1ttS.1tl4 Te»t~! MCSC 93-94 Budget $7 000 $0 . . . 702 S214 801 Page 2 so _$0 $0 _10 IO _t_o _t_o _10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so so t42 U1 + State/Local/Private • Total Coate 1 000 000 000 000 702 000 $6 000 $16 500 $10 00') $500 $2 300 $3 000 $14 000 $23 320 $123,322 S503.741 1/18/94 �AppendlX B STATE J OHN OF :'VIICHIGA:"' E~GL::=! EXECUTIVE ORDER No. 1993-24 MICIDG.A!'f COMMl.JNITY SERVICE COMMISSION MICHIGA..'f JOBS COMMISSION WHEREAS, this administration continues to be commit~d to encauraging all citizens, organizations and institutions in Michigan to help solve our most critical problems by volunteering their time, effort, energy and service; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to call upon the energy, campassion, inventiveness and entrepreneurial spirit of all citizens to help solve many of the problems facing their communities; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this -administration to discover and to encaurage new community service leaders, to promote individuals, organizations and institutions that serve as outstanding examples of a commitment to serving others, and to convince all Michigan citizens that a successful life includes servi.ng others; and WHEREAS, significant issues facing the state can be addressed by callaborative efforts involving committed citizens volunteering their time and talents, volunteer centers, community organizations, business and labor groups , and a host of other community and State agencies; and WHEREAS, the Michigan Community Service Commission, which was c:-eated punuant to Executive Order 1991-25 and transferred to the Michigan Jobs Commission by Executive Order 1993-4, has e~erienced success in promoting volunteerism and community service; and WHEREAS, Public Law 103-82, the National and Community Service Trust Act, and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto reqv.ire that state community service commissions be composed of certain members and perform certain duties in order to qualify for federal funds made available to states under the Act; and WHEREAS, the goals of this administration and the Act are facilitated by the c:-e3.tion of an organization within the State of Michigan designed to promote the foregoing objectives and to secure available federal funds for the purposes indicated. ~.. 0-' .. :. ;.,.,. ..,.- ~ �NOW, THEREFORE, I, John Engler, Governor of the State of Michigan, pursuant to the powers vested in me· by the Constitution of the State of Michigan of 1963 and the laws of the State of Michigan, do hereby establish the Michigan Community Service Commission within the Michigan Jobs Commission. The Commission shall have the following responsibilities: 1. Develop a three-year comprehensive national and community service plan for the state that shall be updated annually; 2. Oversee and submit the state's applications to the Corporation for National and Community Service and other public and private funding sources; 3. Establish policies and procedures for the use of federal funds; and 4. Develop initiatives to promote community service in coordination with existing programs. The Commission shall include the following voting members and such other voting members as the Governor may appoint: 1. The superintendent of public instruction or his or her designee; 2. A representative of a community-based agency or organization in the state; 3. A representative of local government; 4. A representative of a labor organization; 5. A representative of business; .. · 6. An individual between the ages of 16 and 25, inclusive, who is a participant or supervisor of a service program for school-age youth, or of a campus-based or national service program; 7. A representative of a national service program; 8. An individual with expertise in the educational, training and development needs of youth, particularly disadvantaged youth; and 9. An individual with experience in promoting the involvement of older adults (age 55 and older) in service and volunteerism. The Commission shall have a representative of the Corporation for N a tiona! and Community Service as an c officio member without the right to vote. The total nnmb.a.r of Commission members shall be at least 15 but not more than 25. The members of the Commission shall be appointed by the Governor and shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor. Not more than 50 percent plus one of the members of the Commission shall be from the same political party. The voting members of the Commission who·are officers or employees of the state shall not exceed 25 percent of the total membership of the Commission. The voting members of the Commission shall select the Commission's chairperson by majority vote. The chairperson shall be selected from among the voting members of the Commission. The Governor may appoint other members of 2 c-,' �the Commission as officer3 and such members shall serve as officers st the pleasure of the Governor. Members of the Commission shall serve three-year terms, except of those first appointed one•third shall serve three-year terms, one-third shall serve twoyear terms and one-third shall serve one-year terms. Terms will expire on the same day as the effective date of this order each year. Members of the Commission shall not receive compensation, but are entitled to necessary expenses for the performance of Commission functions based on existing state rates. The Commission shall function indefinitely and shall provide the Governor with an annual report that describes its activities during the preceding year. Annual reports shall be submitted not later than 60 days after the close of each fiscal year. The Commission shall have an executive director and such additional staff as may be required to carry out its mandate. The executive director of the Commission shall report directly to the Governor and to the Commission for the purpose of giving advice and making recommendations on programs and laws related to volunteerism and community service. All state departments and agencies shall cooperate with the Commission in the performance of its responsibilities. The Commission may request, and state agencies and departments shall provide, such policy and technical information as is required by the Commission in the discharge of iu responsibilities. The Commission shall be subject;to the Open Meetings Act, Act No. 267 of the Public Act of 1976, being Section 15.261 et seq. of the Michigan ~mpiled Laws, and shall be subject to the Freedom of Information Act, Act No. 442 of the Public Acts of 1976, being Section 15.231 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws. Executive Order 1991-25 is hereby rescinded. The provisions of this Executive Order shall become effective upon filing. Given under my hand and th~at Seal of the State of Michigan this day of December, in the Year of our Lord, One Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety·Three, and of the Commonwealth, One Hundred FiftySeven. BY~RNOR: '~)<~ SECRETARY OF SI'ATE ,;_. Filed with Secretary of S: 2 ~ ~ ,... .., / l. . ,-, ~a J .... , , ,- �AppendlxC Geographic Distribution of 1992·1994 CNCS Grantees In Michigan and Location of Focus Groups Legend • • .• SERVE MICHIGAN· K-12 Generation Grant-Higher Education State & Local Youth Service Corps Focus Group Site Region Focus Group Sites • Marquette • sault Ste. Marie ·Gaylord ·Muskegon • Benton Harbor • Kalamazoo • Flint • saginaw ·Detroit- 3 ·Lansing • Mount Pleasant • YpsllantU Ann Arbor • Grand Rapids �Appendix D L Effective service is a process of lifelong learning and citizenship. 2 Effective service must prove a lasting impact on participants and the community. 3. Effective service provides individuals with the opportunities to practice their rights and responsibilities as community members. 4. Effective service encourages inclusive communities to build bridges, respect uniqueness, and share resources for the common good. 5. Effective senice strengthens .multi-cultural communities and atrums social diversity. 6. Effective senice requires organizations to be open, ready and capable of providing meaningful opportunities. 7. Effective service requires all participants to be connected to the American social system allowing personal independence and creating community interdependence. 8. Effective service charges all organizations and individuals to constantly develop strategies to achieve these principles. D~/oped joinl/y by Compact· 1993. tM MicldgtJII C017111Wl1ity S~rvic~ Commission and the MicldgtJII Campus �f AppendixE \IICII((;_\\ ( '()\1\ll'\ITY SER\.1( 'E l'()\1\IISSH>:\ Timeline for State Plan I AmeriCorps Noyember - Japuary 28 November 15, 1993 Convene Michigan Steering Committee on National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. January 7, 1994 Develop Authorization and Funding Application for State Commissions, Alternative Administrative Entities, and Transitional · Entities application January 7, 1994 Finali u sites for focus groups. January 11, 1994 Review final regulations on AmuiCorps. January 28, 1994 Finalize the requirements of RfP. January 28, 1994 LegislativeiGencnfPublic Briefing brochure completed January 28, 1994 Begin to design AmeriCorps participant statewide training/orientation January 28, 1994 Develop statewide marketina sttategy to promote MCSC's service plan to deal with new national service thrust Jan.- February, 1994 *Summer of Safety Regulations Febmaa - March 31 February 1, 1994 State Administrative Grant due to the Corporation February 8, 1994 Legislative/General Public Briefing trochure mailed out February 15, 1994 Send out RFP's February 23, 1994 Statewide Community F<nm Teleconference. Revised January 18, 1994 Page 1 �TllllCline for State Plan I AmeriCops March 1 & 2, 1994 Technical Assistance Session on AmeriCorps State RFP Detroit and Lansing March 8, 1994 Technical Assistance Session on Serve and Learn America I CBO's March 11, 1994 Complete the compilation of data attained from focus groups March 15, 1994 Summer of Safety Application due to Corporation March 31, 1994 Finalize the selection criteria for the AmeriCorps participants. March 31, 1994 Final AmeriCorps participant statewide training/orientation materials completed. April • May 31 April1, 1994 •Learn and Serve America: School Based Programs application due to Qxporation April 9, 1994 •Learn and Serve America; Higher Education application due to the Corporation April15, 1994 •AmeriCorps, National Service Direct application due to the Corpcntioo April15, 1994 •AmeriCorps, National Service State Level RFP due to MCSC April15, 1994 Learn and Serve America State Level Community Based Program duetoMCSC April 15, 1994 Submit or facilitate the submission of a Summer of Safety proposal to CNCS. April11, 1994 FinaH:u AmeriCorps community site training materials. Apri120- May 13, 1994 Peer review and selection of proposals fer inclusion in State application to CNCS. Apri129, 1994 Complete training module/materials for AmeriCorps participants. April29, 1994 Deadline for RFP submission to MCSC. May 20, 1994 Fmal Michigan Community Service Commission Approval of AmeriCorps grantees and Learn and Serve America CBO grantees. Revised January 18, 1994 Page 2 �t Tuneline for State Plan I AmeriCorps May 27, 1994 Learn and Serve America CBO to Corporation May 31, 1994 Complete state-wide training components/materials for AmeriCorps communities/sites (Reserve training sight very early) Jupe-Aupst 31 June 15, 1994 AmeriCorps National Service State Application to Corporation June- July, 1994 Complete development of intake process for AmeriCorps placements/slots. •These applicants to the Corporation will be required to inform the State Commission of their application to the Corporation and submit copies of such to the State Commission. Revised January 18, 1994 Page 3 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Administrative-Grant-Proposal-Application Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Application for State Commission for Administrative Funding Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Application for State Commission for Administrative Funding. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49597 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/779acc969f09fc78d1412961c8165d31.pdf aa968af27c5d939e8d6dc86eed6cde8d PDF Text Text Memorandum To : Michelle Engler From: Anne Mervenne Re: Michigan Community Service Commission appointments update Date: March 23, 1994 L. To be announced today: 12 Carol Dombrowski, Kalamazoo -- Employed by Senior Services, Inc. where she is the Director of the Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) . Represents Senior Associations. She will appointed, serving and attending today's meeting and has been invited for events this evening. 21 Jim Muir, Grand Rapids Representing individuals with disability, active volunteer in a number of activities including: -- Grand Rapids Center for Indepedent Living -- polio survivor; hearing impaired. -- Seniors Helping and Reinforcing Education, working as a tutor -- Ken-o-Sha school for physically and emotionally impaired children -- Grand Rapids Wheelchair Sports Association --President of local National Assoc. for Physically Handicapped --Founding member of Goodwill Industries. He will not be attending today. IL Pending appointments: (awaiting return phone call) 1) Sylvia Evans -- Inter Tribal Council specialist on children and youth issues to represent Native Americans. I will keep you apprised on other developments, i.e.,: --Marilyn Lundy; DNR and American Red Cross, ex-officio; local Government representative. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Appointments-Update Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting appointments update Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting appointments update. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49599 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a3c2262b03d3ba12aa59fde5c7ce6c60.pdf 2cdbaa3c59d97e8193037f9e7e2b010a PDF Text Text MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION CO~CTOF~RESTPOUCY The Michigan Community Service Commission, in recognition of potential conflict of interest situations, adopts the following policy to guide its work: 1. Members of the Commission are asked to declare actual or potential conflict of interest situations at the start of each meeting where the agenda indicates such a conflict will occur. If a conflict of interest situation develops during Commission discussion, the Commissioner with the conflict is expected to notify the Chairperson. A conflict of interest is defined as a situation where a member of the Commission is serving or has served in the last year as a trustee, officer, director, employee or volunteer in an entity which is requesting approval of a grant from the Michigan Community Service Commission or any other relationship which a Commissioner at his/her own discretion deems a conflict of interest. 2. Any members of the Commission with a conflict will be called on by the Chairperson to explain the conflict. The Commission member will then be excused by the Chairperson while other members of the Commission discuss the application and vote its acceptance or denial as well as other grant applications under the same program. Following action on the grant request, the Commissioner may return to the Commission work. 3. Michigan Community Service Commission members who are unsure about a conflict of interest situation should discuss their concerns with the Chairperson prior to the meeting where the conflict might occur. 4. If this restriction creates a situation in which the Commission does not have enough eligible voting members to achieve a quorum, the Commission may involve the normally excluded member subject to the following conditions: a) The Chairperson will randomly and in a non-discretionary manner select the number of recused members to achieve a ·quorum; b) Notwithstanding the above, no Commission member may, under any circumstances, participate in any discussions or decisions regarding a grant application submitted by an organization which he/she is or was affiliated according to the definition above; �c) If recused members are included so as to achieve a quorum, the Commission must document the event and report it to the Corporation within 30 days of the vote. 5. In addition, Commission members are restricted from assisting organizations of which they are a trustee, director, officer, employee, or volunteer in preparing a grant application to the Commission or from providing oversight, evaluation, continuation, suspension or termination of any grant award to that organization. In general, the Michigan Community Service Commission wants to err on the side of too stringently enforcing conflict of interest policies in order to assure that both the fact and the perception of any unethical conduct is avoided. I, the undersigned agree to adhere to the above policy and procedure. Name: Date; � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Conflict-of-Interest-Policy Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Conflict of Interest Policy Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Conflict of Interest Policy. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49600 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/633d2b8c813f9d4be4087c26e58e5925.pdf 990d0d2aa46e6de192262e300dd2f4d7 PDF Text Text l):) i l6 : 9-l 13 :5 0 DC COMMUNICATION '5'51i-l96648i 141001 Dow Corning Corporation Corporate Communications (517) 496 - 6487 .To: JV1rr~ EsTrc~D~ Fax: 373 ~'-fCf77 From: l e ~e-'i 7e.u \IT'""" Subject: _ _ _~--------~-< .SeNO/N{, If you do not receive ---;-ery ro 1 COI'V1Nl!SS/o~t:YcS .. pages, please call ~ulll at (517) 496 - 88'27 • DOW CORNING COMMUNICATIONS ... about the people and products who make Dow Corning the world leader in silicone technologies �'6'51i-1 96 64 Si DC COMMUN I CATION 14100 2 DOW CORNING . . March ~6, -:.- -. . .. . ....· .. · : . . ~994 TO: Michigan Community service Commission Members FROM: Terry Pruitt, Vice Chair SUBJECT: Diana Algra TP-is note is intended to serve as just a reminder to return your completed performance evaluation form (I've enclosed another copy for your convenience) to me as soon as possible. Diana has indicated tbat she is very interested in having some formal. feedback regarding her job performance as Executive Director to the MCSC even though she is leaving. Please forward to: Terry Pruitt ~469 ~~~endale Dr. saginaw, MI 48603 (5~7) (5~7) 496-8827 (OJ 792-~5~~ (H) P~ease note, too, that donations are still being accepted toward a for Diana which will be presented to her on March 23rd fo~~owing our business :meetL11g. A financial. gift of $1.0-20 . oo has been suggested. Your contribution should be forwarded directly to Mary Estrada at the commission office: Olds P~aza Building, 4t~ F~oor, l.I~ S. Capito~ Avenue, P.O. BOX 300~5, Lansing, MI 48909. gift Thank you for your support and cooperation regarding these matters. I know that several_ comm.issioners bave already complied wi tb one or both these requests. If so, please disregard this notice. I look forward to seeing you on the 23rd. sincerely, 0.1)liLtd_ CF? Terry G>rui tt TElEPHONE (51 7) 4%-4000 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Diana-Algra-Eval-Letter Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Diana Algra evaluation letter Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Diana Algra evaluation letter. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49601 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/367b218cc4bff1c2adef78bba9b0f1f5.pdf 36416ce36a263d13a1d9f5cf4a3d41bc PDF Text Text STATE OF MICHIGAN JOHN ENGLER, Governor MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION Chairperson Michelle Eng ler Executive Director Diana Rodriguez-Aigra TO: 201 N. WASHINGTON SQUARE VICTOR OFFICE CENTER LANSING , MICHIGAN 48933 TEL. (51 7) 335-4295 FAX (517) 373-4977 MEMORANDUM Michelle Engler, Chairperson Michigan Community Service Commission FROM: Mary Estrada Michigan Community Service Commission RE: Executive Committee meeting DATE: March 9, 1994 We had talked about an Executive Committee meeting before the regular Commission meeting on March 23, 1994. Do you want to have it at the residence from 11:30 a.m. till12:30 p.m.? That would give all of the Executive Committee enough time to drive downtown and get to the 1:00 p.m. Commission meeting. Or would you rather have it here at MCSC Conference Room on 4th Floor? If you have it at the residence, would you want to serve lunch? Please note that the residence staff will be preparing for the reception scheduled for 5:30 p.m. relating to our Recognition Awards. Also what would be the purpose for this meeting? Let me know and I will get the memo out to the Executive Committee yet this week. Thanks! A Division of the Michigan Jobs Commission 0' ~ PP.lfrft£D OH """""'"""' � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Executive-Committee Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting executive committee Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting executive committee. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49602 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/b4766dff325c5839ff33db2650369d0a.pdf 532f9aba3f495d96593ca28e4c22bbf3 PDF Text Text STATE OF MICHIGAN 0Fi" CE O F r"' e: GOVERNOR 1 JOHN ENGLER EXECUTIVE ORDER No.l993-24 MICWGAN COM:MUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION MICmGAN JOBS COMMISSION WHEREAS, this administration continues to be committed to encouraging all citizens, organizations and institutions in Michigan to help solve our most critical problems by volunteering their time, effort, energy and service; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to call upon the energy, compassion, inventiveness and entrepreneurial spirit of all citizens to help solve many of the problems facing their communities; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this'tldministration to discover and to encourage new community service leaders, to promote individuals, organizations and institutions that serve as outstanding examples of a commitment to serving others, and to convince all Michigan citizens that a successful life includes serving others; and WHEREAS, significant issues facing the state can be addressed by collaborative efforts involving committed citizens volunteering their time and talents, volunteer centers, community organizations, business and labor groups, and a host of other community and State agencies; and WHEREAS, the Michigan Community Service Commission, which was created pursuant to Eucutive Order 1991-25 and transferred to the Michigan Jobs Commission by Eucutive Order 1993-4, has experienced success in promoting volunteeriam and community service; and WHEREAS, Public Law 103-82, the National and Community Service Trust Act, and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto require that state community service commissions be composed of certain members and perform certaiD. duties in order to qualify for federal funds made available to states under the Act; and WHEREAS, the goals of this administration and the Act are facilitated by the creation of an organization within the State of Michigan designed to promote the foregoing objectives and to secure available federal funds for the purposes indicated. c-,' ...,.- ..:· =··· ...... �NOW, THEREFORE, I, John Engler, Governor of the State of Michigan, pursuant to the powers vested in me by the Constitution of the State of Michigan of 1963 and the laws of the State of Michigan, do hereby establish the Michigan Community Service Commission within the Michigan Jobs Commission. The Commission shall have the following responsibilities: 1. Develop a three-year comprehensive national and community service plan for the state that shall be updated annually; 2. Oversee and submit the state's applications to the Corporation for N a tiona! and Community Service and other public and private funding sources; 3. Establish policies and procedures for the use of federal funds; and 4. Develop initiatives to promote community service in coordination with existing programs. The Commission shall include the following voting members and such other voting members as the Governor may appoint: 1. The superintendent of public instruction or his .or her designee; 2. A representative of a community-based agency or organization in the state; A representative of local covernment; A representative of a labor organization; A representative of business; ._. An individual between the ages of 16 and 25, inclusive, who is a participant or supervisor of a service program for school-age youth, or of a campus-based or national service program; 7. A representative of a national service proeram; 8. An individual with expertise in the educational, training and development needs of youth, particularly disadvantaged youth; and 9. An individual with experience in promotinc the involvement of older adults <ace 56 and older) in service and volunteerism. 3. 4. 5. 6. The Commission shall have a representative of the Corporation for National and CommUDity Service as an e: officio member without the right to vote. The total Dumber of Commission members shall be at least 15 but not more than 25. The members of the Commission shall be appointed·by the Governor and shall serve at t&e pleuure of the Governor. Not more than 50 percent plus one of the members of the Commission shall be from the same political party. The voting members of the Commission who·are officers or emJlloyees of the state shall not exceed 25 percent of the total membership of the Commission. The voting members of the Commission shall select the Commission's chairperson by majority vote. The chairperson shall be selected from among the voting members of the Commission. The Governor may appoint other members of 2 --, 0 -::::" �the Commission as officers and such members shall serve as officers at the pleasure of the Governor. - Me~ers of the Commission shall serve three-year terms, except of those first appomted one-third shall serve three-year terms, one-third shall serve twoyear terms and one-third shall serve one-year terms. Terms will expire on the same day as the effective date of this order each year. Members of the Commission shall not reeeive compensation, but are entitled to necessary expenses for the pe:riormance of Commission functions based on existing state rates~ The Commission shall function indefinitely and shall provide the Governor with an annual report that describes its activities during the preceding year. Annual reports shall be submitted not later than 60 days after the close of each fiscal year. The Commission shall have an executive director and such additional staff as may be required to carry out its mandate. The executive director of the Commission shall report directly to the Governor and to the Commission for the purpose of giving advice and making recommendations on programs and laws related to volunteerism and community service. All state departments and agencies shall cooperate with the Commission in the performance of its responsibilities. The Commission may request, and state agencies and departments shall provide, such policy and technical information as is required by the Commission in the discharge of ita responsibilities. The Commission shall be subject-to the Open Meetings Act, Act No. 267 of the Public Act of 1976, being Section 15~261 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws, and shall be subject to the Freedom of Information Act, Act No. 442 of the Public Acts of 1976, being Section 15.231 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws. Executive Order 1991-25 is hereby rescinded. The provisions of this Executive Order shall become effective upon filing. Given under my hand and th~at Seal of the State of Michigan this day of December, in the Year of our Lord, One Thousand Nine Hundred N"mety·Three, and of the Commonwealth, One Hundred FiftySeven. BY12:3~ SECRETARY OF STATE Filed with Secretary 1"., 1.1 . , ., :· J -~ J ; of S:J·~ . - � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Executive-Order-MI-Jobs-Commission Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Executive Order Michigan Jobs Commission Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Executive Order Michigan Jobs Commission. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49603 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/45440a4d8b45acf4b157a222e0c0d7f0.pdf d0d54f39355419730d6d3596f2f18747 PDF Text Text What is the purpose of the internship? The Governor's Management Internship would permit the Commission to select and bring an individual on board who would be responsible for assisting in the maintenance and expansion of all areas of the Commission's work. The major emphasis of the internship will be to develop and maintain a monitoring and evaluation system for the Commission and the programs it funds. This internship could involve work in many areas including providing training to individuals and groups, creating and implementing follow-up procedures, maintaining an accounting system, and any other work that might assist in this process. What education major is required to satisfy this internship? A masters degree in a related field of study. What experience is desired (but not required)? Some experience with or knowledge of evaluation processes and data collection systems is helpful. Strong verbal and written skills are absolutely necessary. In addition, a basic understanding of program planning and implementation, community organizing and CBO's (community-based organizations) is required. How will the Governor's Management Intern benefit the department? This internship will allow the Department (Commission) to maximize its role as the state's acting body and Michigan's liaison to the National Corporation of Community Service. The major emphasis of the internship position will be to permit the unit to maximize its working relationship with its outside evaluating agency and their efforts to create and maintain a reporting system for the programs the Commission funds. How will the Governor's Management Intern be used to accomplish the purpose of the internship? This internship will permit the individual to participate in all of the various areas of the Commission's work. Careful supervision and mentorship will be provided via the Executive Director of the Michigan Community Service Commission. Close work will also occur with other members of the Commission. See copy of grant application attached. Please note page 2 under Institutional and Personnel Information for job responsibilities. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Governors-Management-Internship Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Governor's Management internship Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting Governor's Management internship. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49604 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/802b55f4ed4027ff1358719e61358c2c.pdf 54ce15d9e033fd5927b03a7162bc0a6c PDF Text Text STATE OF MICHIGAN JOHN ENGLER, Governor MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION 201 N. WASH INGTON SQUARE VICTO R OFF IC E CENTE R LAN SING , MICH IGA N 48933 TEL. (517) 335-4295 FAX (517) 373-4977 Chairperson Michelle Engler Executive Director Diana Rodriguez-Aigra DATE: March 11, 1994 TO: Michelle Engler, Chairperson Michigan Community Service Commission' \ ob~1rf-PJ FROM: Linda Kinney, Acting Executive Michigan Commumty Service Co~bri SUBJECT: Preparation for MCSC Meeting./ I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you for approximately one hour during the week of March 14 to prepare for the March 23 Commission meeting. Topics to be discussed include: • • finalization of the Commission meeting agenda and discussion of agenda items; and, timeline and options regarding the review of proposals submitted for AmeriCorps and Learn and Serve - CBO programs. I suggest that Kyle and Sam accompany me to allow for additional input into our discussion. Thank you. A Division of the Mich igan Jobs Commission 0,-- � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1994_CM_1994-03-23_Letter-to-Michelle-Engler Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting letter to Michelle Engler Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1994-03-23 commission meeting letter to Michelle Engler. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49605 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-03-23