<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=203&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-05-02T14:03:19-04:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>203</pageNumber>
      <perPage>24</perPage>
      <totalResults>26018</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="26439" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="28646">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/91fcb6cdef948fed53054e970e3ddf2b.jpg</src>
        <authentication>baad7de06f9e5f9a96617d530a9f8b65</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464843">
                  <text>Decorated Publishers' Bindings</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464844">
                  <text>Book covers</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464845">
                  <text>Covers (Illustration)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464846">
                  <text>Graphic arts</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464847">
                  <text>Publishers and publishing</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464848">
                  <text>Pictorial bindings</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464849">
                  <text>From the early 1870s to roughly 1930, many publishers issued their commercial book covers with a remarkable variety of graphic designs and illustrations. This sixty-year period saw many artists and designers contributing to this art form. While some can be identified from their style or initials, others remain unknown.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464850">
                  <text>Seidman Rare Books Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465152">
                  <text>Michigan Novels Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465153">
                  <text>Regional Historical Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465154">
                  <text>Lincoln and the Civil War Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464851">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464852">
                  <text>2017-08-30</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464853">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464854">
                  <text>image/jpg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464855">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464856">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464857">
                  <text>DC-01</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="62">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description/>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="492290">
              <text>Seidman Rare Books. HV9468 .T72 1908 </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492274">
                <text>DC-01_Bindings0204</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492275">
                <text>The Prisoner at the Bar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492276">
                <text>Decorative Designers (Designers)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492277">
                <text>Binding of The Prisoner at the Bar: Sidelights on the Administration of Criminal Justice, by Arthur Train, published by C. Scribner's Sons, 1908.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492279">
                <text>Book covers</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="492280">
                <text>Covers (Illustration)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="492281">
                <text>Graphic arts</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="492282">
                <text>Publishers and publishing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="492283">
                <text>Pictorial bindings</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492284">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492285">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492286">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492287">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="492289">
                <text>1908</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030435">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54655" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58926">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a23d1c3aef3e97aef90a77f964e2fd3a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9d8dd30dcef3e5cf65f9e1919d0be3f2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1007616">
                    <text>----------~------------~~__;;."•'e,
I

~......,

IELD
"
'
,
DEERF
TOWNSHII?:
·.' ·t - -:_;_, ,.

r(.:

,,l,

·,.

J

.

- 'f!rf,
r· \,,_ ~.
'1

t

i . .,

.,,, , '.~

tt

'

' .

.

·.-,.......

'"'"';

'

t,..

·•

'

. ~~·i,-:)r, -~

II

,,

III

12

-~=---1----~ ' '
··•

.

,I

i

•

,.
___ ;..,.
'

'

21

I
II

-30

~

'2e'1

•

27

II

I

•

I

'

I

~,

I

',,
'
~I

1994 .,,,,.

('.

.f

�DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Prepared By:
Deerfield Township Planning Commission
and Township Board of Trustees

Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.
302 S. Waverly Road
Lansing, Ml 48917
(517)886-0555
and
Landplan, Inc.
4211 Okemos Rd.
Suite# 15
Okemos, Ml 48864
(517)347-2120

Adopted July 21, 1994

�DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Robert Miller, Supervisor
Harold Williams, Treasurer
Nancy Laier, Clerk
Read Dunn, Trustee
Don Tinson, Trustee

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP
PLANNING COMMISSION
Read Dunn, Chairperson
Scot Runyan
Karen Clute
Robert Birney

Phyllis Grannan
Carolyn Kelley
Garry Johnston

With the Assistance of:
Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.
302 S. Waverly Road
Lansing, Ml 48917
(517)886-0555
Carolyn Freebury
Kelly Gettle
Linda Beck

Mark A. Wyckoff, AICP
Brenda M. Moore, AICP
Timothy McCauley

Mark A. Eidelson, AICP
Landplan, Inc.
4211 Okemos Rd.
Suite 15
Okemos, Ml 48864
(517)347-2120

�,-

.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Plan Purpose ............................................................................................................................1-1
Plan Contents and How to Use the Plan ................................................................................... 1-1
P.lan Preparation .......................................................................................................................1-2
Chapter 2 - Community Character
Introduction .....................................................................................:........................................ 2-1
Demographic Summary ............................................................................................................ 2-1
Open Space .............................................................................................................................2-2
Natural Resources Summary ....................................................................................................2-2
Existing Land Use Patterns .......................................................................................................2-3
Visual Landscape Areas ...........................................................................................................2-4
Critical Trends ..........................................................................................................................2-7
Chapter 3 - A Common Vision: Goals &amp; Objectives
Vision Statement ......................................................................................................................3-1
Definition of Goals, Objectives, and Policies .............................................................................3-2
How the Goals &amp; Objectives Evolved ........................................................................................3-2
Goals &amp; Objectives ...................................................................................................................3-2
Chapter 4- Future Land Use Strategy
Introduction and Purpose ..........................................................................................................4-1
Overview of the Future Land Use Strategy ...............................................................................4-1
Individual Components of the Future Land Use Strategy ...........................................................4-2
Commercial and Industrial Development ...........•..........................................•..........................4-11
Public Lands ...........................................................................................................................4-12
Recreation Lands ...................................................................................................................4-13
Special Land Uses ..................................................................................................................4-13
Principal Road Corridors .........................................................................................................4-14
Chapter 5 - Public Services Strategy
Introduction and Purpose ..........................................................................................................5-1
Overview of Public Services Strategy .......................................................................................5-1
Individual Public Service Components ......................................................................................5-2
Intergovernmental Coordination .................... ;: ..........................................................................5-9
Appendix A
Location and Geography.......................................................................................................... A-1
~

'

Appendix B
Historic Perspective ................................................................................................................. B-1
Appendix C
·
Physical Profile - Natural Features ........................................................................................... C-1
Appendix D
Physical Profile - Land Use/Cover, Public Services and Facilities ............................................. D-1
Appendix E
Demographic Profile ................................................................................................................ E-1

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�I

LIST OF MAPS

..,

Map 2-1 Visual Character Inventory .......................•........................................................................2-6
Map 4-1 Future Land Use ...............................................................................................................4-5
APPENDICES
Map C-1 Steep Slopes
Map C-2 Drains
Map C-3 Watersheds
Map C-4a Soil Types-South - Half
Map C-4b Soil Types-North - Half
Map C-5 Limitations for Septic Systems
Map C-6 Limitations for Basements
Map C-7 Most Suitable Soils
Map C-8 Hydric Soils
Map C-9 Prime Farmland Soils
Map C-1 0 Woodlands
Map C-11 Wetlands
Map C-12 Groundwater Vulnerability
Map D-1a Land Cover/Use - South Half
Map D-1b Land Cover/Use - North Half
Map D-2 Land Cover/Use
Map D-3 PA 116 Farmlands
Map D-4 Land Use by Parcel - Tax Class
Map D-5 Roadway Classification (Act 51)
Map D-6 School Districts
Map D-7 Public Facilities
Map 0-8 WaterWells

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I'

�LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Planning Process ...........................................................................................................1-2
Figure 4-1 Development Flexibility Through •Average Development Density• and Resulting
Open Space Benefits .................................................................................................................4-3
Figure A-1 ..................................................................................................................................... A-1
Figure A-2 ...................................................................................................................................... A-1
Figure A-3 ...................................................................................................................................... A-1
Figure D-1 Example of Lot Split Evolution ...................................................................................... D-3
Figure D-2 State Equalized Value 1982 - 1991 ............................................................................... D-7
Figure D-3 Allocations of Local Property Taxes - 1991 ................................................................... D-8
Figure E-1 Population Growth Trend-Deerfield Township and Area Communities ........................... E-4
Figure E-2 Population Growth Trend-Livingston County: 1900 - 1990 ............................................. E-5
Figure E-3 Population Growth Trend-Livingston County and Deerfield Township ............................ E-6
Figure E-4 Persons Per Square Mile-Deerfield Township and Livingston County ............................ E-7
Figure E-5 Median Age Distribution 1970 - 1990 ............................................................................ E-8
Figure E-6 Age/Sex Distribution by Percent-Deerfield Township: 1980 ........................................... E-9
Figure E-7 Age/Sex Distribution for Deerfield Township: 1990 ...................................................... E-1 0
Figure E-8 School Enrollment by District 1971 - 1990................................................................... E-11
Figure E-9 Number of Households-Deerfield Township 1960 - 1990 ............................................. E-12
Figure E-10 Person Per Household 1970- 1990 .......................................................................... E-13
Figure E-11 Percent of Workers by Industry,
Employment by Sector Livingston County: 1980 &amp; 1990 ........................................................... E-14
Figure E-12 Percent of Workers by Industry, Deerfield Township: 1980 &amp; 1990 ........................... E-15
Figure E-13 Unemployment Rates, Deerfield Township &amp; Livingston County: 1982 -1991 ........... E-16

~

-

•
/

M
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�I

LIST OFTABLES
Table 4-1 Development Densities by Use Area ...............................................................................4-2
Table 5-1 Perceived Road Condition by Number of Daily Car Trips .................................................5-3
Table C-1 Climatic Information ....................................................................................................... C-1
Table C-2 Lakes 10 Acres or Larger .............................................................................................. C-2
Table C-3 Soils Map Units
Table C-4 Woodland Use/Cover Codes in Deerfield Township ................ , ...................................... C-6
Table C-5 Wetland Use/Cover Codes .•.....................................................•.................................... C-7
Table D-1 24 Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................ D-4
Table D-2 State Equalized Value 1982 - 1991 ................................................................................ D-7
Table E-1 Historic Population ....................................................-..................................................... E-4
Table E-2 Historic Population, Livingston County, 1900 - 1990 ....................................................... E-5
Table E-3 Percent Increase in Population ...................................................................................... E-6
Table E-4 Persons Per Square Mile ............................................................................................... E-7
Table E-5 Median Age ................................................................................................................... E-8
Table E-6 Age/Sex Distribution by Percent-Deerfield Township: 1980 ..........•................................. E-9
Table E-7 Age/Sex Distnbution by Percent-Deerfield Township: 1990 .......................................... E-10
Table E-8 School Enrollment by District 1971 -1990 .................................................................... E-11
Table E-9 Number of Households 1960 -1990 ............................................................................. E-12
Table E-1 0 Persons Per Household 1970 -1990 ......................•....................••............................. E-13
Table E-11 Percent of Workers by Industry,
Employment by Sector Livingston County: 1980 &amp; 1990 ....................•...................................... E-14
Table E-12 Percent of Workers by Industry, Deerfield Township 1980 &amp; 1990 ............................. E-15
Table E-13 Unemployment Rates, Deerfield Township &amp; Livingston County 1982-1991 ............. E-16

,

~

Ill
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

\

�Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION
PLAN PURPOSE

• to promote an orderly development process
which is paced in coordination with the Township's ability to provide services and which
permits public officials and citizens an opportunity to monitor change and review proposed
development in a reasonable manner; and

The purpose of this Plan is to guide policy and
decision making for all future land and infrastructure
development decisions within Deerfield Township.
Within the Plan, key planning issues are identified;
goats, objectives and policies are outlined; future land
uses are described and mapped; public facility standards are established; and implementation measures
are recommended.

• to provide information from which to gain a better understanding of the Township and its interdependencies and interrelationships, and upon
which to base future land use and public investment decisions.

This Plan is adopted pursuant to the authority of
the Township Planning Act, PA 168 of 1959. This Act
provides for the preparation of a "basic plan" to promote community health, safety, and welfare through
provisions for the use of land and resources and the
assurance of adequate public facilities and services.
The Deerfield Township Comprehensive Plan is a
"basic plan." It is prepared as a foundation for, and depends primarily on, the Township's zoning ordinance,
and the subsequent adoption of subdivision regulations and a capital improvement program for effective
. . implementation. Although this Plan states land use
development policy -and proposes land use arrangements, it has no regulatory power.

PLAN CONTENTS and
HOW TO USE THE PLAN
There are three critical components to using this
plan as a decision making guide. First, are the goals
and objectives in Chapter 3. Second, are the policies,
future land use map, public facilities plan and associated descriptive information presented in Chapter 4
and Chapter 5. Third, is the supporting documentation
found in Appendices A-E which draws directly from
previous planning and engineering studies.

All proposed future land uses and policies presented in this Plan were developed based on a blending of the natural capability of the land to sustain certain types of development; the important natural tune. tions played by unique land and water resources in the
area; the relative future need for residential, commercial, and industrial land uses; the existing land use distribution; the relationship of undeveloped lands to existing community character. and the desires of local
residents and public officials as expressed through interviews, town meetings, and public hearings.

This Plan is presented to help all elected and appointed officials to make difficult choices between
competing interests and to serve as a guide for decision making. It is anticipated that this Plan will be used
and consulted in the following situations:
• Preparation of Updated Zoning Regulations:

This Plan is intended as support for the achievement of the following public objectives, among others:

This Plan charts a new purposeful future for
Deerfield Township. Its success will be largely
dependent upon effective zoning provisions to
implement the policies of the Plan. The Plan
serves as the guide or foundation upon which
new zoning provisions should be based and
drafted.

• to protect public health, safety and general welfare;

• Review of rezonlngs, variances, and special
use permits: Applications for rezonings, vari-

ances, or special use permits should be eval~ated not only in terms of specific zoning ordinance standards, but also in terms of how well
the proposed action would help attain the goals
and objectives of this Plan (Chapter Three) and
fulfill its policies (Chapters 4 and 5).

• to conserve and protect property values by preventing incompatible uses from locating adjacent to each other;
• to protect and preserve the natural resources,
unique character, and environmental quality of
the area;
1-1

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�I

• Public Improvement projects: All future public
improvement projects, including the construction
of new facilities, utilities or buildings, should first
be reviewed by the Planning Commission for
consistency with this Plan, pursuant to PA 168
of 1959. In particular, such projects should be
reviewed to determine consistency with the
goals, objectives and policies in the Plan
(Chapter 3), and whether they support the
planned future land use pattern anct public
services in the Township as set forth in this Plan
(Chapter 4 &amp; 5).

Township's rural character, open spaces, farmland,
and natural resources; maintain the gravel road n~
work, limit future growth and development, and mi ~
mize future taxes. The combined results of the Murin~
session, an analysis of economic and demographic
trends, and mapping analysis, were used to determine
the issues to be addressed by the Comprehensive
Plan.
Fl ure 1-1 Plannin

• Review of land subdivision and lot splits:
The subdivision of land and associated lot split
activities has a profound impact upon the character of a community and future public service
needs and tax burdens. This Plan provides policies to assist the Planning Commission and
Township Board regarding decisions about the
appropriateness of proposed subdivisions and
lot splits, and the adequacy of public services to
address the increased demands associated with
th_ese subdivisions and lot splits.

Process

Data Collection and Mapping

• Township stability: This Plan is a strong and
visible statement by the Township and its residents regarding the intended future character of
the community and strategies to assure that
character. As a formal and tangible document,
this Plan instms a sense of stability and direction
for Township officials, Township residents, and
Township activities.

Draft Goals and Objectives
Goals and Objectives
Refined at Town Meeting

r.

,

Draft Alternative
Development Patterns
Town Meeting

PLAN PREPARATION

Draft Comprehensive Plan

The Planning Process
The planning process used in developing the
Deerfield Township Comprehensive Plan included a
combination of Planning Commission meetings with attendance by members of the Township Board, computerized mapping, data analysis, development of
alternative development schemes, four town meetings,
and a public hearing. The planning process is
represented graphically in Figure 1-1.

Public Hearing on Plan

At the first •town meeting• in January of 1993, an
overview of current economic and demographic trends
and Issues was presented, and a •tuturing• session
was conducted in which citizens of Deerfield Township
were asked to visualize Deerfield Township 10-20
years in the future as they wanted it to be. This resulted in citizens articulating their vision and desires
for their community. Key issues which surfaced during
this town meeting included the preservation of the

Draft goals and objectives were developed from
the public vision statements generated at the first town
meeting and were presented at the second town
meeting in April of the same year. Following refinement of the goals and objectives with input from t~

1-2
OEERFI ELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

-

�Chapter 2
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
INTRODUCTION

in size today throughout the Township, approximately
half of the Township land area is characterized by lots
of 40 acres or less in size, the majority of which are
ten acres or smaller in size.

Deerfield Township is a rural community situated
on the fringe of the Greater Detroit Metropolitan Area.
The expanding growth and sprawl of the suburbs from
the Detroit area has already been witnessed by many
residents in the Township . The Township's farming
and open space atmosphere, in conjunction with easy
access to these employment and retail centers in the
Detroit Metro Area as well as the urban centers of Flint
and Ann Arbor, make the Township attractive for development.

The northern areas of Bennett Lake and the periphery of Lake Shannon have evolved as the most
densely developed areas in the Township, consisting
largely of platted subdivisions and similar neighborhood type development patterns.

DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY
Between 1980 and 1990, the Township's population increased by nearly 15% and reached a total
population of 3,000 persons. This growth has occurred
within and among the Township's extensive natural
amenities including rolling terrain, inland lakes,
streams, woodlots, wetlands, expansive farmlands and
open spaces. (See Appendix A for more information
on location and geography).

Though Deerfield Township is generally characterized by relatively dispersed development, it has nonethe-less increased in population by nearly 75% between 1970 and 1990, and 15% between 1980 and
1990. While the population increase of the 1980's
(15%) seems relatively small, it is much greater than
the state's growth rate during the same period (less
than 1%). By the year 2010 the Township's population
is anticipated to reach 3,921; an additional 31% increase over the 1990 population figure (according to
the Livingston County Planning Department).

A substantial amount of residential development
has occurred in Deerfield since 1970, with the addition
of 242 dwelling units between 1970 and 1980 and an
additional 131 units added between 1980 and 1990,
resulting in a total count of 1,053 dwelling units in
1990. The years 1991 through 1993 (thru October)
witnessed the issuance of 107 new residential building permits. State equalized value (SEV) attributed to
residential development increased by 62% between
1982 and 1991, increasing from $26.2 million to $42.5
million. Commercial land values showed little change
in the same time period. The SEV for agricultural lands
in the Township rose by 15% from $7.1 million to 8.3
million. Overall, the Township's SEV increased by 49%
between 1982 and 1991 .

With the increase in population has come an increase in population density (persons per square
mile). In 1900, Deerfield Township had 23.9 persons
per square mile. By 1960, it had increased to 30.6,
and it increased to nearly 80 by 1990. The greatest increases in population densities have focused in the
Bennett Lake and Lake Shannon areas.
Although minority populations have increased
slightly since 1980, the Township's population is relatively homogeneous; with 99.3% of the population being white. Additionally, most of the households in
Deerfield are comprised of married-couple families
(74.5% of all households) and 95.6% of the housing
units are single family.

A growing market for residential development has
spurred a large number of parcel splits in ·the Township . Average parcel size in the Township in 1930 was
in excess of 80 acres. Between 1971 and 1980, there
was a marked increase in the number of lot splits than
in the previous four decades as ten acres lot splits began to predominate in many areas of the Township,
particularly in the southern half of the Township. The
ten acre lot splits have continued over the years as
now nearly all areas of the Township reflect such a
pattern to one degree or another. While there are still
a substantial number of parcels of 80 acres or greater

The age structure of Deerfield Township suggests
maturing families with children and relatively low numbers of persons 65 years and over. Median age in the
Township is slightly lower than that of the County and
State averages, which suggests the presence of aging
"baby boomers"who are now rearing families.

2-1
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�While the number of persons per household in the
Township (3.11) is higher than the State (2.66) and
County (2.94), household size has decreased since
1980. This parallels state and national trends toward
smaller families, childless couple families, and more
single-parent households.

in only a few areas have pastoral vistas have been
replaced with strip residential development pattern~
The extent to which open spaces have been pr(
served is due more to the limited population, the type
of growth and development in the Township, expansive agricultural lands, and individual property owner
commitment to protection of these open spaces, rather
than a purposeful regulatory program aimed at effective conservation of these areas.

Deerfield Towns hip is also a relatively wealthy
community in that the per capita income has increased
at a faster rate than the state's. Between 1979 and
1989 Deerfield's per capita income increased approximately 108% while the state's increased approximately 84% in that same time period. Since per
capita income figures are derived by taking total income and dividing it by every adult and child, it is especially significant that Deerfield's per capita income
remains high despite a larger household size. Another
measure of wealth in a community is the median value
of housing stock and the rate of home ownership.
Deerfield Township has a higher owner-occupied median housing value than the state ($83,100 vs.
$60,600). Of all the housing units in the Township,
89% are owner-occupied. The state rate of homeownership is approximately 74%.

·

However, if past trends and development pressures continue, the future of these open spaces will
become more in doubt. The provisions of the Township's current zoning ordinance do little to aggressively
protect farmlands or the Township's rural character
and open spaces. Without intervention, the random
land use pattern which has evolved in the Township
will worsen and, along with the unregulated lot splits
permitted under the Subdivision Control Act (creation
of four lots under 1O acres in size every ten years) will
lead more and more to the insidious conversion of
these open spaces.

NATURAL RESOURCES SUMMARY
Deerfield Township's population is a commuting
population; the average travel time to work for Deerfield residents was 31.3 minutes in 1990. Workers
commute primarily to the Detroit metro-area, and
Genesee and Washtenaw counties. As in 1980, the
majority of Deerfield Township's labor force in 1990
was employed in manufacturing and service sectors of
the economy.

Topography and Watercourses
Most of Deerfield Township is characterized b~
rolling topography. Few areas in the Township are fl[" 1
and many areas of the Township exhibit grades approaching 10% or greater. Many of the steepest
slopes, some exceeding 18%, are found along the
Township's drainage corridors. The highest elevations
in the Township are in the southeast quadrant of the
Township and the Township falls in elevation to the
north and west.

For a more detailed overview of Deerfield Township's demographics, see Appendix E.

There are four principal watercourses in the
Township, each flowing in a south to north direction.
North Ore Creek and the south branch of the
Shiawassee River are situated in the Township's
northeast and northwest quadrants, respectively.
Cranberry Creek flows through the central regions of
the Township while the Yellow River Drain flows
though the western half of the Township.

OPEN SPACE
Open spaces are as much a fundamental part of
Deerfield Township's character as are the residents of
the Township. Extensive open spaces exist throughout
all areas of the Township, including wetlands, woodlands, agricultural fields, shrub and herbaceous fields,
and rolling hillsides. It is the extensive open spaces.
which so dramatically shape the character of the
Township, provide endless panoramic vistas and natural resource systems, and document the strong ties
between the Township's early settlement days and the
Township today.

Lakes
Deerfield Township has numerous lakes ranging in
size from less than 1 acre to approximately 180 acres,
and total over 880 acres in area (see Map C-2). The
majority of the Township's larger lakes are situated in
the northern two-thirds of the Township. Most significant of the Township's lakes include Bennett Lake,
Lake Shannon, Ryan Lake, Indian Lake, and Lou~
Lake. There are several lake chains in the Townshi~- -

The integrity of the Township's open spaces has
largely been preserved over the years. Natural resource systems have been generally undisturbed and
2-2

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�-

comprised of lakes in close proximity to one another
and connected through rivers, creeks, or drains. These
include the Louis/Lamb/Root Lakes chain in the central
region of the Township and the BennetVLobdell Lakes
chain in the Township's northeast corner. The BennetVLobdell Lakes chain is part of an extensive chain
of lakes and wetlands areas which stretches east
across Tyrone Township.

Wetlands
Deerfield Township has a significant amount of
wetlands. Most of the wetland areas of the Township
consist of shrub swamps and low-lying woodlands
(see Map C-11 ). Wetlands are concentrated primarily
along the Township's water courses and lakes. There
are several extensive wetland areas in the Township,
each approaching 300 acres in size or greater, including wetlands associated with Bennett Lake/North Ore
Creek and Indian Lake. Many of the wetlands may not
be covered with water year-round. The Township's
wetlands contribute to the natural beauty of its watercourses and lakes, as well as serve important flood
control, water purification, and wildlife habitat roles.

The larger Township lakes reflect varying degrees
of development. Lake Shannon, along the southeast
edge of the Township, has been fully developed with
residential subdivisions and is the most developed of
the lakes. While the north side of Bennett Lake in the
Township's northeast corner reflects the greatest lake
development intensities in the Township, the south includes extensive areas of wetlands and only limited
developable areas. Similarly, while the east side of
Ryan Lake has been developed residentially, approximately half of the lake's remaining shoreline is characterized by wetlands, with woodlands and open fields
accounting for the balance of the lake's shoreline areas. The remaining lakes of the Township have experienced only limited development if any at all. A seasonal recreational vehicle campground has been developed on both Indian Lake and Louis Lake. As might
be expected, the visual character of the lake areas in
the Township has been significantly altered with the
onset and expansion of development. Most of the land
surrounding smaller"lakes (20 acres or less) in Deerfield Township remains undeveloped.

Agricultural Land
Deerfield Township has extensive agricultural
lands approaching 10,000 acres. These lands are
largely characterized by extensive areas of prime
farmland soils. More than two thirds of the Township's
farmlands are situated in the eastern half of the Township, and the majority of these farmlands are along
Argentine Road or within one mile of this primary
transportation corridor. The acreages of these farmlands typically vary from 40 acres to 200 acres and
more. The majority of the land being farmed today is
owned by the family operating the farm, although approximately 2,000 acres of additional farmland is being
leased for farm use by farm families. Farming has always been the foundation of the Township and continues to be the dominant land use aside from natural
open spaces. The farmlands lend significantly to the
diverse rural character of the area and provide open
spaces to compliment the area's rolling hills.

Woodlands
The wooded areas of Deerfield Township substantially contribute to the picturesque rural character
· of the area and are evident throughout all areas of the
Township (see Map C-10). Most of these wooded areas are considerable in size, typically exceeding 80
contiguous acres. The most significant of these larger
wooded areas are associated with Indian Lake and
along the Township's western boundary, north of Hidden lake. Each woodland stand extends more than
two miles in length, include wetland environments, and
cover more than 600 acres. Though lowland hardwoods predominate throughout the Township's wetland areas, upland hardwoods are the predominant
type of forest cover with only limited areas of conifers.
These large tracts of woodlands are an essential element of wildlife habitats and the rural character of the
Township.

There are over 2,400 acres of land in Deerfield
Township enrolled in the state's Farmland and Open
Space Preservation Program.

EXISTING LAND USE PATTERNS
The general land use character of Deerfield Township is one of open spaces. Just over 95% of the
Township area is characterized by some form of open
space. Agricultural alone comprises more ~ha~ 40% of
the Township area and woodlands compn~e JU~t ov~r
23%. Agriculture in Deerfield Township Is pnm~nly
crop farming but includes a significant amount of hv~
stock farming as well. The principal farming are~s in
the Township follow the Argentine Road comdor.
Open fields, including shrub and herbaceou_s lands account for approximately 21% of the Township area.
Urban development comprises less than 5% of the
Township area with residential development account2-3

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�•

ing for the vast majority of the urban development in
the Township. The Bennett Lake and Lake Shannon
areas are the most intensively developed residential
areas in the Township, consisting of residential developments where lot sizes typically range between 1/4 to
3/4 acres in size. The Bennett lake and Lake Shannon
Lake areas account for more than 400 of the approximately 1;100 dwelling units in the Township in 1993.
Thus, approximately 36% of the Township's dwelling
units cover less than 2% of the Township area. The
balance and vast majority of the Township's residential
development is comprised primarily of large lot residences of 5 and 1O acre parcels. There are no apartment buildings or other multiple family structures in the
Township.
Commercial and industrial development is very
limited in the Township. There are approximately a
dozen small scale commercial facilities including a restaurant, bar, bakery, dog kennels, auto repair shops,
and convenience stores. The commercial facilities are
scattered throughout the Township though many are
situated along Argentine Road and Bennett Lake
Road. Though land near Argentine and Cohoctah
Roads is zoned for industrial use and there are several
small buildings of an industrial character, the buildings
and site improvements reflect comparatively limited investment and the current use of the land is not certain
though limited car sales and repair appear to take
place.

Argentine Road Farmland Corridor

Possibly the most dominant of the landscapes µ-Deerfield Township is the Argentine Road Farmlar.,_
Corridor. Argentine Road is the most heavily traveled
road in the Township, running the full length of the
Township and cutting through the primary farming belt
in the Township. Nearly all of the lands abutting this
roadway corridor are in agricultural use, and those few
which are not are either vacant or developed at very
low densities (parcels of 5 to 20 acres in size). The resulting visual image is one of continuous open spaces
dominated by crop and livestock farmland. The Argentine Road Farmland Corridor extends approximately
one half to one mile east and west of Argentine Road.
Nowhere else in the Township can one travel and be
continuously exposed to the farming character of the
Township.

Satellite Farmland Area

~SUALLANDSCAPEAREAS

The Satellite Farmland Area includes predominantly farming areas which, though not part of the Argentine Road Farmland Corridor Area, include areas
of extensive and contiguous farmland. The expansiveness of these areas contribute to their uniqueness as
a landscape type within the Township. This Area also
includes a limited degree of low density residential development (generally 5 and 1O acre lots). Though
farming is the predominant visual element in this Area
wetlands and woodlands are visible throughout i'
well. There are four Satellite Farmland Areas, all or
which are in close proximity to the Argentine Road
Farmland Corridor except for that Area in the far
northwest comer of the Township.

Overview

Mixed Open Space Area

The visual character of Deerfielc:I Township is one
which reflects strong rural elements interlaced with limited
features of suburbanization. Within this context however,
there are a number of clearly identifiable landscapes arid
Township regions which come together to create the
unique community of Deerfielc:I Township. While there is
probably little difference in local opinion about the description of Deerfielcl's visual character, .there may be cf1verse opinions about lines and boundaries which separate the variable landscapes in the Township. Below is
one description of the landscapes of Deerfield Township.
It is presented because of its utility in documenting the
existing character of the Township, and because of the
insight it provk::fes for land use planning purposes. The
visual character assessment below k::fentifies six principal
landscape areas in the Township and elaborates upon
each. The landscape areas are illustrated in Map 2-1.

The Mixed Open Space Areas are generally found
adjacent to both sides of the Argentine Road Farmland
Corridor. This Area is principally characterized by a
mosaic of open space areas including farmlands, large
lot residences, and vacant parcels. Woodlands and
wetlands are the predominant visual element throughout this Area and account for the dominant character
of parcels as large as 40 acres or more. These woodland and wetland areas are interspersed with farmlands approaching 80 acres or more in size and large
lot residences generally comprising 5 and 1O acres. A
significant portion of the Mixed Open Space Area includes the Oak Grove State Game Area in the western
portion of the Township.

2-4
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�North Bennett Lake Area

and the chain of lakes and wetlands of which it is an
intrinsic part, is void of any significant development
and acts as both a strong visual and environmental
component of the Township as well as a natural barrier to the encroachment of development. It's presence
is somewhat obscured by the fact that none of the
Township's principal roads afford views or access to
this Area. In fact, the best visual access to this expansive and beautiful area is in Tyrone Township from
Linden Road.

The North Bennett Lake Area ls dominated by the
strongest suburban-like landscape in the Township.
The North Bennett Lake Area is generally characterized by those lands north of Bennett Lake Road, extending to the north and east Township boundaries.
There are numerous platted subdivisions in this Area
as well as a mobile home park and several commercial
developments, including vrs Grocery and Bakery,
Twin Gardens Restaurant, and the Old Hickory Bar.
The North Bennett lake Area accounts for more than
250 of the Township's approximately 1,100 dwelling
units.

Lake Shannon Area
The Lake Shannon Area is the smallest of the
landscape types by area and includes the shoreline
areas of Lake Shannon. The Lake Shannon Area reflects a suburban character only slightly less intensive
than the Bennett Lake Area. The entire lake area in
Deerfield Township Is surrounded by residential development and this development pattern extends into the
Township of Tyrone. There are approximately 150
residential lots in the Lake Shannon Area, the majority
of which are between approximately 1/2 and 3/4 acres
in size.

Bennett Lake Wetlands Area
The Bennett Lake Wetland Area deserves identification as a unique Township landscape area for two
reasons. First, it is the most extensive area of wetlands in the Township covering nearly 300 acres in
area and includes the primary lake area as well as the
east end of Bennett lake which consist of numerous interconnected channels. Second, the Bennett Lake
Wetland Area is the final stretch of a lake and wetland
chain which extends east across the western portion
of Tyrone Township. The Bennett Lake Wetland Area,

•
2-5
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�•

Map 2-1
VISUAL CHARACTER INVENTORY
~ I I D.

.

·...---·

l
31

•

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

32

~

(:

--

3

J_j_ __
"

Argentine Road Farmland Corridor
Satelffte Farmf arid Area
Mixed Open Space Area
North Bennett Lake Area
Bennett Lake Wetlands Area
Lake Shannon Area
2-6
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�CRITICAL TRENDS

permits lot splits of a minimum of 20 acres in its primary agricultural district. This type of zoning scheme
though intended to protect farmlands, can in fact hav~
the reverse effect and result in the loss of thousands
of acres of farmland for very low density residential
d~velopment. As farming becomes less economically
viable as a result of residential encroachment, there
will be increasing pressure to rezone land to a residential zoning district and higher density residential
development will follow.

While all communities are going through a constant evolution in response to changes in economic,
physical, social, and political patterns, Deerfield Township finds itself at a critical crossroads today. Though
the Township has changed considerably since its early
settlement days, the Township has largely maintained
its expansive open spaces and agricultural lands.
Similarly, its population has remained comparatively
low. However, the ability of the Township to retain its
current character over the next several decades is of
far greater question than it was during its previous 100
year history. There are a number of critical trends and
conditions which face the Township today and, depending upon how the Township chooses to address
them, will dramatically shape the future character of
the Township.

-

Development that does not accommodate unique
natural characteristics (e.g., retention of native vegetation, slopes and wetlands) will alter the character of
the Township over time. Groomed yards will replace
native vegetation and wildlife habitat. Water quarrty in
area lakes and streams will decrease as pesticides, lawn
chemicals and other artificially introduced nutrients and/or
contaminants reach the water. Those open spaces that
may be preserved are apt to be fragmented and be far
less functional and visual in the environment. Eventually,
the Township will take on the appearance of a more
urbanized suburb than a rural area.

Deerfield Township has, up until recent times, escaped much of the development which has encroached upon its neighbors as the urban sprawl of
the suburban Metropolitan Detroit Area continues to
expand. However, this trend may well be changing as
few townships in Livingston County significantly surpassed the growth rate experienced by Deerfield
Township (14.9%) between 1980 and 1990. Continued
growth and resulting land development has the tremendous potential to take away Deerfield Township's
current rural and fafllling character and replace it with
a suburban residential character, much like what has
evolved in neighboring Tyrone Township and in response to which Tyrone Township has recently prepared a new Comprehensive Plan to address this
same issue.

This uncontrolled land development can be equally
devastating to the Towns hip roadway network. The
strip residential development pattern which could begin to dominate, and which existing but vacant lots
have already paved the way for, will increase the
number of residences accessing the primary roadways ·
directly and thereby continually shortening the
distance between driveways. The result will be increased congestion, traffic hazards, and travel times
and a complete transformation of the visual landscape.
The visual character of the Township will be typified by
a County roadway network lined with residences. The
visual experience from the roadway will not provide
any real sense of present and past rural character.
The extensive gravel road network throughout the
Township will require far more in maintenance costs
than current conditions.

The lack of a Plan and an effective zoning ordi. nance to address growth and community character issues in Deerfield Township, and its already somewhat
random land use pattern, makes the Township that
much more vulnerable to the negative impacts of future growth and development.

The increase in density, and general lack of public
sewer in the Township, will place greater pressure
upon ground water resources as their vulnerability to
contamination through on-site sewage disposal will increase.

The Township is apt to experience increasing
pressure upon the development of its lakes. This pressure is apt to focus on both those lakeside developable lands currently vacant as well as those lakeside
parcels which have already been developed but which
may provide opportunities for redevelopment at higher
densities.

•

The introduction of new and expanded services
provided by the Township will become a larger issue in
the future as the population grows, households increase, and land is further developed. Public protection problems (police and fire protection, emergency
medical service and transportation management) will
become more acute. The result will be the loss of rural
character and increases in local public services and in-

At present, the future of farming in Deerfield
Township is not clear. This lack of clarity is a result of
how the Township's current zoning ordinance treats
farmland, and the resulting implications are tremendous. Specifically, the Township's zoning ordinance
2-7

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�These trends and conditions will continue as long
as B11COUraged by public po/Icy and permitted by exis$;lng regulations. This Plan sets forth a new public fX ,.
Icy Intended to encourage new development in a way
which protects public values associated with a clean
environment and scenic open spaces.

frastructure needs and local taxes to support such
needed improvements. The Township Is characterized
by very limited publlc services and Infrastructure and
new and expanded programs and infrastructure would
be required to accommodate the potential growth. And
yet, the residents of Deerfield Township have clearly
expressed their Insistence on protecting the Township's rural character and natural resources and their
dissatisfaction with the levels of current taxes!

2-8
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Chapter 3
A COMMON VISION: GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES
VISION STATEMENT

appropriate locations for such land uses exist within
the Township.

The planning process followed in the preparation
of this Plan identified community attitudes regarding
the future character of Deerfield Township and developed a consensus of public opinion regarding future
land use and community development. This consensus was arrived at through town meetings where the
public was given opportunities to identify the preferred future character of the Township and comment
on and shape the evolution of the Plan. Citizens
consistently portrayed a common vision for the
Township's future which was founded upon the preservation of the Township's natural resources and current "rural-like" character. The following vision statement portrays the prevailing aspirations of Township
residents :

~

•

The appropriate location for, and intensity of, future residential, commercial, and industrial development will be largely based upon the existing or
planned availability of public services to support new
land uses and assure the public's health, safety, and
welfare. The extent to which public services will be
expanded within the Township will be based upon
available financial resources and the planned long
range land use pattern for the Township, the necessity to accommodate new urban land uses (high
density residential. commercial, and industrial), and
the need to address anticipated or existing emergency public health, safety, or welfare threats. It public services are expanded, it will occur in a planned
incremental manner so as not to over-accelerate
Township growth and development. The Township
will continue to rely largely upon private on-site septic
systems tor waste disposal and private wells for potable water, and has no intention at this time of introducing Township-operated public sewer and water
infrastructure. The reliance on private septic systems
and wells will play a major role in the intensity of
future development where public sewer or water is
unavailable.

The early years of the 21st Century will see
Deerfield Township much in the same way it looks
today. The Township's landscape will be dominated
by active tannland within a mosaic of other open
spaces including woodlands and wetlands. The wild/ife which abound today will continue to be plentiful.
The natural resources of the Township, including its
air and water resources, will be pristine and there will
exist an overall atmosphere of health and vigor
among the residents and families of the Township.

Deerfield Township will not be the future home of
a landfill. It will, however, be the home of citizens with
a strong environmental awareness. This awareness
will bring about the development of a Township-wide

Growth and development within the Township will
• be slow and deliberate. While the population of the
Township will increase through the years, residential
development will be of an intensity and form that the· ·
Township's rural character and natural resources will
not be sacrificed. Residential development practices
will recognize the sensitive nature of the Township's
resources and their intrinsic values. Active steps will
be taken through site plan review and construction to
assure their continued integrity. The preservation of
open spaces will be a key basis for future r.esidential
development. Single family homes will continue to
predominate in the Township.

,

recycling program to reduce the waste stream, and
other waste management initiatives. This strong environmental awareness will further strengthen the already existing strong community spirit. This wholesome spirit will continually encourage communitywide cooperation and understanding among residents. A sense of horniness, friendship, and warmth
will permeate the Township. The community-wide
cooperation and understanding will extend to regional
planning efforts and activities aimed at assuring a
quality of life desired by the Township residents.

The future of Deerfield Township will rest vastly
upon its agricultural and residential land uses. While
there will be expanded opportunities for commercial
and industrial development. these opportunities will
be limited. Commercial and industrial development
will be established only where it has been found that

This Township-wide vision strongly molded the
goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan.

3-1
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�•

DEFINITIONS OF GOALS,
OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

the impetus for the second town meeting where the
public scrutinized the first draft version for languag~
and omissions. Based upon the results of the secor:' ;.
town meeting, a refined set of goals and objectives'
was prepared.

Goals, objectives, and policies play a fundamental role in the Deerfield Township Comprehensive
Plan. The goals and objectives chart the Plan's direction and form, and the policies present key implementation strategies to assure the Plan's direction is
followed. The relationship between goals, objectives,
and policies is as follows:

GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES
Following are goals and objectives to accomplish
the common vision for the future of Deerfield Township. Policies to implement the goals and objectives
are presented in the next two chapters (Chapters 4
and 5).

THE GOALS are destinations. or final conditions
which Deerfield Township seeks to attain. A goal is a
general statement of intent and, by itself, is not very
helpful to the decision makers of the Township. It
needs further refinement to assist Deerfield Township
officials and decision makers to reach a decision or
preferred destination. It is like saying, "/ want to take
a vacation."

Although goals and objectives are grouped under
several categories, there are numerous interrelationships among them. Some goals and objectives are
concurrent, while others must be accomplished in
sequence.

THE OBJECTIVES are the routes which specify
in general terms the ways (routes) by which the goals
(destination) can be reached. An objective indicates
the kinds of actions that may be used to achieve the
goal. It is a "means" to the "end". It is like setting
aside "$X" by "Y date" to travel to "Z location" for a
vacation.

Land Use Planning
&amp; Growth Management
GOAL: Guide future development in a manner
which is consistent with the natural limitations of the
land, the preservation of important open spaces and
natural resources, the preservation of the rural character, and the planned provision or expansion ~
necessary public facilities and services.
T

THE POLICIES-are the means of achieving the
objectives and hence the goals. It is a specific course
of action which, if followed, will achieve an objective.
A policy is more detailed than an objective and can
be readily translated into specific action recommendations or design proposals. A policy would be synonymous with having the bank regularly deduct $50
from your paycheck and your family cutting back on
eating out as a way of generating the money necessary for the vacation. Policies will be presented in .
more depth in Chapter 4 and Chapter 5.

Objective: Continually provide regular opportunities for substantive public input on growth and development issues facing the Township and the future
character of the Township.
Objective: Provide for the preservation of open
spaces through a coordinated land use plan and related regulations which permit reasonable use of
land.
Objective: Discourage forms of growth and development which will encourage the premature consumption of, or otherwise loss of, the Township's
farmlands, natural resources, and open spaces.

HOW THE GOALS &amp;
OBJECTIVES EVOLVED
The evolution of the goals and objectiv!3s for the
Deerfield Township Comprehensive Plan involved
several steps to identify pertinent issues and address
those issues. The initial citizen input component included a "futuring session" (Town Meeting #1 ), where
participants were asked to visualize Deerfield Township twenty years in the future. Before the first draft
of goals and objectives was written. the results of the
futuring session were tabulated, and key issues were
extracted. Draft goals and objectives were formulated
to address all of the issues identified and provided

Objective: Discourage the expansion of infrastructure-based public facilities and services (sewer,
water, paved roads, for example) into the Township
except where the intensity of development requires
such services or where the public health, safety, or
welfare is at risk.

Objective: Prohibit new growth and development
that requires levels of public facilities and service~
3-2

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�unavailable in the Township until the time such levels
of service become available.

Objective: Protection of the Township's open
spaces should equally apply to environmentally sensitive areas, such as steep slopes, wetlands and
stream corridors, and land not suitable for development because of soil and/or topographic limitations
on structures or septic systems.

Objective: Wherever legally permissible, and
other public interests are not of greater significance,
local regulations should require new development
pay for both the direct and indirect costs associated
therewith; rather than having those costs imposed on
existing residents.

Objective: Enact standards for residential,
commercial, and industrial development which require site design measures be incorporated to protect
environmentally sensitive areas, avoid unnecessary
disturbance and destruction of open spaces, and
preserve the landscape's natural assets and important open spaces.

Objective: Recognize that Deerfield Township Is
a critical link within a regional chain of communities
and that since its planning and growth management
efforts and those of other communities in the chain
will impact the greater regional area, intergovernmental coordination is essential.

Objective: Ensure that new development protects the natural or aesthetic character of environmentally sensitive areas through responsible and innovative development, including site planning techniques, building materials and designs, and environmental buff er areas.

Objective: Develop and maintain a meaningful
communication program whereby Deerfield Township
and all adjoining municipalities and area school districts regularly convene to discuss local and areawide public facilities and services needs, land use
conditions and trends, contemporary planning issues,
and strategies to address short and long term needs
and issues in a mutually beneficial manner.

Objective: Maximize the amount of open spaces
and natural areas preserved where multiple lots or
dwelling units are created by encouraging development on only a small portion of the original parcel,
thereby preserving the remaining balance in open
space.

Objective: Develop and maintain a meaningful
communication program with the Livingston County
Road Commission, Livingston County Public Health
Department, Livingston County Planning Department,
and other County agencies to discuss existing, proposed, and future land use, public services, and associated issues, and strategies to coordinate local efforts with beneficial regional planning strategies.

Objective: Encourage the use of programs and
tools designed to preserve open spaces including the
use of conservation easements and land trusts.
Objective: Educate the public about waste management and encourage the establishment of a
township-wide recycling program, in coordination with
County and regional efforts, to reduce the amount of
solid waste, and discourage the establishment of a
landfill in the Township based upon factual technical
data.

Community Character
&amp; The Environment
GOAL: Preserve the rural character and envi- .
ronmental integrity of Deerfield Township.
·
Objective: Document and establish the existing
character of the Township to serve as the basis for
programs to protect and enhance the positive aspects of that character and rectify those conditions
which threaten the public health, safety, and welfare,
and other elements contributing to the quality of life in
the Township.

Objective: Ensure that the quantity and quality
of new development does not substantially increase
air, noise, land, and water pollution, or the degradation of land and water resource environments, and
that all development and land uses be in compliance
with the Michigan Environmental Protection Act and
all other applicable County, state, and federal regulations.

Objective: Recognize that the Township's open
spaces, including woodlands and farmland, are a
fundamental component of the Township's rural
character and should be protected while still providing a land owner with reasonable use of his or her
land.

Objective: Identify vulnerable and sensitive areas of aquifers and watersheds in Deerfield Township and enact regulations to protect against alterations of the natural hydrology which would reduce the

3-3
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�•

water quality, and/or increase the intensity and quantity of runoff.

Public Facilities &amp; Services
GOAL: Expand the Township's public facilitl~
and services as necessary for maintenance of tt, f
public health, safety, and welfare, provided such'
changes are consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan's proposed future land use pattern, and are incremental in nature and do not encourage excessive
growth over vast areas of the Township.

Objective: Adopt regulations aimed at assuring
that existing and new development will not destroy or
otherwise lower the quality of on-site and off-site environmental resources.
Objective: Educate the public regarding the
Township's fundamental reliance upon ground water
resources for potable water supplies and the potential
detrimental effects of land development upon ground
water resources.

Objective: Identify those areas of the Township
which, due to existing conditions and the planned future land use pattern of the Township, may be in
need or will be in need of improved police and fire
protection services and other non-infrastructure
based community services.

Transportation/Roads
GOAL: Develop and maintain a transportation
network throughout the Township which moves vehicular traffic in an efficient and safe fashion, channels residential and nonresidential traffic onto road
segments specifically designed to accommodate
higher traffic flows, and provides safe and functional
opportunities for alternative modes of transportation
including walking and bicycling.

Objective: Identify those areas of the Township
which, due to existing conditions and the planned future land use pattern of the Township, may be in
need, or will be in need, of improved public infrastructure and related services including sanitary sewer,
potable water, and stormwater management.

Objective: Encourage the continuance of the
Township's gravel dominated transportation network
by limiting development densities except in those areas of the Township planned as growth areas.

Objective: Develop a capital improvements program which identifies planned improvements to public
facilities and services, in response to existing Township conditions and the planned future land use pattern of the Township, by year, cost, and anticipat~ .
source of revenues.
.,..

Objective: Identify priority road segments for
maintenance and improvement, based upon the
planned future land use pattern for the Township and
existing traffic patterns, and include them in the
Township's capital improvements plan.

Objective: The Township should establish -a
committee to work with local and state emergency
response offices for the purposes of establishing a
Township -specific emergency disaster plan.

Objective: The Township should periodically
· meet with the Livingston County Road Commission
to discuss existing and new techniques for the de- .
sign, construction, and maintenance of gravel roads
in an effort to continually improve the Township's
gravel road network in a cost effective manner.

Objective: Require any private sanitary or water
system serving more than a single family home be
designed to easily connect with any future public system in the area.
Objective: Establish a regionally coordinated
Township-wide recycling program which facilitates
ease and convenience of use.

Objective: Adopt land use and/or other regulations which minimize the potential for traffic congestion and safety hazards along adjacent roadways, including limitations on the number, size, and shape of
new land divisions along County roads and the prevention of ·strip• development, through land division
and access policies and regulations.

Objective: Encourage the development of a
Township-wide recycling program which relies upon a
single recycling company, provided a single company
can provide practical and cost-effective recycling
services.

Objective: Develop plans and regulations to expand alternative transportation facilities, including
walkways and bicycle trails, in coordination with
neighboring municipalities and regional efforts.

Objective: Encourage the development of a
Township-wide trash collection program which relies
upon a single collection company, provided a single
company can provide practical and cost-effectiv~
collection services.
3-4

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Objective: Identify needed recreation opportunities in the Township and establish a strategy for addressing these needs which includes both public and
private sector involvement.

Commercial &amp; Industrial Development
GOAL: To the extent opportunities exist for
commercial and industrial land uses, provide practical, functional, and limited locations and patterns for
such uses, and provide regulations which support the
needs and operations of these land uses, minimize
their impact upon adjacent land uses, and maintain
high levels of aesthetic and qualitative character.

Objective: Develop and maintain a regular
meaningful communications program with adjoining
municipalities and regional agencies to discuss and
investigate both infrastructure-based and non-infrastructure-based public facilities and services needs,
opportunities for shared facilities and services, and
alternative strategies for contracted services versus
Township-operated services.

Objective: Evaluate the opportunities and constraints for new commercial and industrial development presented by the Township's natural features
and available public facilities and services to identify
the appropriate locations of future commercial and
industrial development and the conditions necessary
to accommodate such development.

Objective: Develop and maintain a meaningful
communication program with local school districts to
discuss land use and public services trends and
conditions, their impacts upon the cost and quality of
school services, and strategies to minimize future
school costs while ensuring the continued quality of
education currently provided.

Objective: Ensure that commercial and industrial
land uses have adequate provisions for sewage disposal, stormwater management, potable water, and
other critical public health and welfare concerns.

Housing

Objective: Limit land division and access along
major roads to prevent commercial or industrial strip
development.

GOAL: Provide for a broad range of housing opportunities which respond to the varying economic,
family stage, and lifestyle needs of the community
while maintaining high levels of aesthetic and qualitative character.

Objective: Ensure that elements for preservation
of the Township's rural character are incorporated
into new commercial and industrial developments by
establishing appropriate site design and building
standards, including screening and protection of
natural resources, and with a special emphasis on
building height and size.

Objective: Encourage the continued dominance
of single family low density housing as the principal
housing option in the Township.
Objective: Identify land areas, through land use
planning and zoning, more capable of and appropriate for single family housing.

Objective: Prevent the premature conversion of
land to uses other than their planned use for future
commercial or industrial development to ensure their
long term availability for commercial and industrial
development.

Objective: While maintaining single family low
density housing as the primary housing option in the ··
Township, explore and implement measures to assure additional housing alternatives (such as special
zoning or other programs in suitable areas of the
Township) to meet the housing needs of the Township's aging persons and families wishing to continue
living in the Township, and the future generations of
existing Township families.
·

Objective: Ensure that new commercial and industrial development does not adversely impact the
normal use and enjoyment of adjoining land uses
through appropriate buffering and other techniques.
Objective: Permit opportunities for home-based
occupations within residential dwelling units in appropriate areas of the Township and under conditions
which will not negatively impact the residential character, appearance, and quality of life experienced by
surrounding residential properties and neighborhoods.

Objective: Identify limited areas, through land
use planning and zoning, more capable of and appropriate for accommodating limited amounts of multiple family housing.

•

Objective: Integrate open space protection with
new housing development through the use of clustering and related techniques.
3-5
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�...
Objective: Provide opportunities for limited areas
of farmland to be converted to residential devetop-\
ment in order to increase income to the farmers ar ...
thus avoid abandonment of farming activities all together.

Farmland
GOAL: Protect the economic and food and fiber
value of agricultural land in the Township by providing local farmers with the opportunity to continue to
farm until the time at which farming is no longer economically feasible.

Objective: Where residential development is
permitted in agricultural areas, encourage such development to be compact in character, with new residential units sited in close proximity to one another,
so that the balance of the parcel may still be successfully farmed.

Objective: Through good planning and appropriate development regulation, the Township will take all
prudent and feasible measures to encourage the long
term protection of economically viable farms and
farmland in Deerfield Township.

Objective: Assist local farmers in their efforts to
organize and support new programs and legislation
which will more permanently protect farmland by both
ensuring the economic feasibility of farming operations and the opportunity for the farmer to capture the
development value of his/her land.

Objective: Identify those lands in the Township
most suitable for future farmland protection programs, taking into consideration those whose soils
are best suited for agricultural production as established by the Soil Conservation Service and/or a history of economically successful farm management,
those lands whose size and contiguous (not necessarily under same ownership) acreage are supportive
of economical management, those lands which are
enrolled in PA 116, and those which are not surrounded by incompatible land uses.
Objective: Establish a disclosure program which
requires builders/owners of new homes in designated
agricultural areas to acknowledge their awareness of
the fact that the primary and preferred use of land in
designated agricultural areas is for agricultural use,
and that they should expect the normal smells, odors,
noises, dust, and associated characteristics of farming operations including the responsible use of
pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers and fungicides as a
part of daily farm life in the area.
Objective: Adopt zoning regulations designed to
protect farming activities in designated agricultural.
areas from the nuisances (destruction of crops,
complaints about legitimate day-to-day farming operations, etc.) associated with incompatible adjacent
uses, including but not limited to residences occupied
by non-farmers.
Objective: To the extent that residential development is permitted to occur in agricultural areas,
encourage such development to be sited on nonprime farmland.
Objective: Ensure through responsible and innovative development and site planning regulations
that new development minimizes disturbances to,
and destruction of, designated farmland areas.

3-6
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Chapter 4
FUTURE LAND USE STRATEGY
INTRODUCTION and PURPOSE

housing market, while at the same time assuring such
roads are built to minimum public health, safety, and
welfare standards and so maintained. Other related
ordinances and a capital improvement program, may,
from time to time, be adopted or amended to further
carry out this Plan.

The planning and zoning program for Deerfield
Township consists of coordinated planning and regulatory components. The principal planning components
are embodied within the Comprehensive Plan's Future
Land Use Strategy, as discussed in this chapter, and
the Public Services Strategy described in the following
chapter. The Future Land Use Strategy is a plan which
identifies the desired pattern of land development
throughout the Township through the establishment of
land uses and densities for areas with common characteristics. The Future Land Use Strategy presents
the intended character of each land use area and
specific policy guidelines for site development projects.

""""-

•

•

OVERVIEW of the
FUTURE LAND USE STRATEGY
Basis
The Future Land Use Strategy establishes the
planned future land use pattern throughout the Township for approximately 20 years. The goals and objectives presented in Chapter 3 are the foundation on
which the Future Land Use Plan is based, including:

The Public Services Strategy in Chapter 5 specifies policies regarding future infrastructure improvements and decisions to assure future public services
are coordinated with the planned future land use pattern in the Township, and that the goals and objectives
of this Plan can be achieved.

• Protection of public health and safety
• Conservation of natural resources, including
preservation of woodlands, wetlands, and lakes
and streams

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUTURE LAND
USE STRATEGY: The regulatory elements of Deerfield Township's growth management program-those
elements intended to implement the Comprehensive
Plan, including the Future Land Use Strategy-will
consist primarily of the regulatory ordinances of the
Township including its Zoning Ordinance. The Township's Zoning Ordinance generally regulates the type,
location, bulk, and intensity of land development
throughout the Township.

• Environmental protection
• Rural character preservation
• Protection of agricultural lands and uses
• Minimizing public service costs
• Insuring compatibility between land uses

The future land use pattern was established based
upon an analysis of the Township's natural and culThe Township also intends to adopt other support- · tural characteristics, community attitudes, the existing
roadway network, soil conditions, existing and nearby
ing regulatory tools to further the implementation of the
public infrastructure, environmentally sensitive areas,
policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Lot split and prineighboring municipaJ land use conditions, and other
vate road regulations are very important as a means to
associated characteristics. The opportunities anci
further implement the Comprehensive Plan and the
constraints presented by these characteristics were
Future Land Use Strategy presented within. Lot split
evaluated within the context of the goals and objecregulations are intended to assure efficient land divitives of Chapter 3 to arrive at a future land use patsion patterns, the avoidance of nonbuildable lots, and
adequate public access to public roads. Lot split regutern.
lations are particularly valuable when lots are being
created outside of the regulatory authority, and adminTownship-Wide Land Use Pattern
istrative review procedures, of the Subdivision Control
The text in this Chapter establishes the policies to
Act. Private road regulations are intended to provide
guide future land use change so as to accomplish the
opportunities for road circulation networks restricted
desired geographic land use pattern illustrated in Map
from general public use, in response to the local
4-1, the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use
4-1
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Strategy calls for a land use pattern in the Township
characterized predominantly by low density residential
development and a variety of open spaces Including
farmland, woodlands, and wetlands. Opportunities for
new commercial and industrial development are
largely limited until the time comes when there Is a
demonstrated need for such uses in the Township and
appropriate locations (with adequate roads and public
services) can be established for such uses.

INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS OF THE
FUTURE LAND USE STRATEGY

LA

.vv '

Following is a review of the principal components
of the Future Land Use Strategy. These components,
collectively, formulate the planned future land use pattern in the Township and generally identify the future
land use pattern by land use type and include policies
regarding each land use type. A summary of the development densities recommended for the Towns hip is
provided below in Table 4-1.

Relationship to Existing
Land Use Pattern and Land Uses
The Future Land Use Strategy calls for a future
land use pattern which is generally similar to that
which currently exists throughout the Township. The
primary differences between the planned and current
land use pattern are:

Table 4-1
DEVELOPMENT DENSITIES BY USE AREA
USE
AVERAGE DEVELOPAREA
MENT
DENSITY*
Conservation
1 unit/20 acres
Agricultural and Rural
varies from 1 unit per 20
Residential
acres to 1 unit per 2
acres, depending upon
development option
selected
Suburban Residential
2 units/1 acre
Lakes Residential
2 units per acre with
sewer, otherwise 1 unit
per 3/4 acres.

• the planned land use pattern provides a strong
and purposeful program to protect the rural
character, open spaces and environmental resources of the Township;
• the planned future land use pattern recognizes
the limited long term commitment to farming in
the Township and provides a practical means of
converting some of the farmland to residential
use while still preserving the overall rural character of the Township.

• Minimum lot size will be established in the Zoning Ordinance.

A major emphasis of the Future Land Use Strategy is
to limit the unplanned strip residential development along
the County roads. This lot split pattern has negatively impacted the rural quality of the Township and the efficiency
and safety of the roadway network (see "Trends and
Conditions" discussion in Chapter 2).

Relationship to Neighboring
Munici panties
The Future Land Use Strategy is based, in part, upon
insuring compatibifity with existing and proposed land use
patterns in those municipanties sharing borders with
Deerfield Township. Such considerations are fundamental
in the interest of intergovernmental coordination, continuity, and compatible land uses. The Futur~ Land Use
Strategy in this Plan proposes comparatively low to very
low density residential and/or conservation {open space)
uses along the periphery of the Township. This pattern of
land use is generally compatible with those existing and
proposed patterns in neighboring communities.

DEVELOPMENT DENSITY: Deerfield Township
wants to provide its current and future residents with
the basis for a zoning program that provides more development flexibility than what is typically provided for.
"Development density" is used in this Plan to descnbe
recommended development intensities. Within the text
of this Plan, references to a particular ·development
density", such as one dwelling unit per 2 acres, means
the density that results by dividing the total acreage of
the project area by the number of dwelling units
planned for that area-it does not mean a unifonn
minimum zoning lot size of 2 acres.

"Development density" refers to the number of lots
per acre rather than a minimum lot size. A landowner
of 40 acres who is provided the opportunity to develop
their property at a development density of 1 dwelling
unit per two acres may have a number of development
options available to them if their local zoning ordinance
permits such options. For example, the landowner
may chose to develop a 20-lot subdivision consisting
of lots of approximately 2 acres in size. T~e dev_elo~
ment density in this case would be 1 dwelling unit PE.
2 acres. On the other hand, the same landowner of 40
4-2

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PL.AN

�acres may have the opportunity to create a 20-lot
( \ subdivision consisting of 1 acre lots and an open
'
space area of approximately 20 acres on the same 40
acres. This development option also results in a development density of 1 dwelling unit per 2 acres (yet
the development does not contain any 2-acres lots).
Finally, the same landowner of 40 acres may have the
opportunity to create a multi-family development con-

sisting of 5 dwelling units in four buildings covering 6
acres, and leaving the remaining 34 acres as open
space. All three development scenarios result in a development density of 1 dwelling unit per 2 acres and
varying degrees of open space and rural character
protection. (See Figure 4-1.)

Figure 4-1
Development Flexibility Through "Average Development Density"
and Resulting Open Space Benefits
The development scenarios below illustrate the development flexibility available by focusing on ·average development density· rather than •minimum lot size.· All of the development scenarios below result in an average
development density of 1 dwelling unit per 2 acres.

A. Traditional platted subdivision

consisting of a 40 acre parcel
divided into 20 2-acre lots.

B. Open space subdivision consisting of a 40 acre parcel divided
into 20 1-acre lots and a permanent open space area of 20
acres.

C. A multi-family development on a
40 acre parcel, consisting of 4
five-unit buildings on 6 acres
and 34 acres of permanent
open space.

These natural resources are scattered throughout the
Township and provide important environmental benefits including habitats for wildlife, flood control,
groundwater recharge and discharge, and surface
water and air purification. In addition, they provide
special opportunities for passive recreation and play a
critical role as elements of the Township's rural character so strongly desired to be retained by residents.

Conservation of
Special Natural Resources
Overview
This Plan calls for the preservation of the Township's natural resources. The Township's natural resources includes its groundwater, surface water, air,
wetlands, soils, woodlands, and hillsides. These natural resources should not be so exploited as to reduce
their long term integrity and availability, or contaminated so as to present health hazards to Township
residents. Some of these resources are particularly
""-. sensitive to degradation from unsound land use and
• development activities and present constraints to land
development.

The Future Land Use Strategy calls for .the conservation of all of these natural resources through both
designated conservation areas in the Township, as
discussed below under "Conservation Area·, and
through conservation policies linked to other land use
areas, presented throughout the Chapter.
4-3

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�•

Conservation Area

Conservation Area whenever the option exists. The
number of dwelling units permitted on a parcel which f""'\
partly included within the Conservation Area should be
based upon the parcel's entire acreage and the development density permitted by the surrounding land
outsid? of the Conservation Area. Whenever possible,
alteration of the natural landscape and development of
new roads and structures in the Conservation Area
should be avoided.

A Conservation Area is depicted on the Future
Land Use Map (Map 4-1). It includes those areas of
the Township characterized by wetlands. hydric soils,
all lands, both public and private, within the boundaries
of the Oak Grove State Game Area, and all lands bordering the Township's principal water courses (not
shown ori Map 4-1 ). The Oak Grove State Game Area
has been graphically illustrated in Map 4-1 as a conservation area separate from other conservation areas
in order to provide greater clarity.

.. Future land use decisions must recognize the significance of these resources to the Township. Any loss
in the quantity or quality of these resources must be
considered permanent and, as such, sound and practical land use and site development practices aimed at
preservation of these resources must prevail. In the alternative, and only when no other practical alternative
exists, mitigation measures may be authorized where
other public benefits of the new land use are great
enough.

Privately owned lands within the Oak Grove State
Game Area are classified within the Conservation
Area in order to preserve the wildlife and environmental integrity of this resource, and preserve the
Game Area's long term viability. The Oak Grove State
Game Area is managed by the Michigan Department
of Natural Resources for the purpose of ensuring the
long time productivity of its natural resources and to
provide public hunting recreation opportunities. Increasing residential development within the boundaries
of the Game Area will decrease land for wildlife habitats, increase public safety conflicts between hunting
and residential land uses, and limit the area available
for hunting due to expanding buffer zones required between designated hunting areas and residences and
boundary lines. If because of new land development
hunting no longer remains feasible in the Oak Grove
State Game Area, fhe area could be closed and the
public lands sold. The Township would then lose a
tremendous open space and wildlife habitat jewer.

POLICIES: The following policies shall guide
the use and development of parcels and portions
of parcels in the Conservation Area:
1) Average development densities for development
within the limits of the Conservation Area should
not exceed one dwelling unit per 20 acres.
2) Alteration of the natural landscape and develo("'ment of new roads should be avoided.
3) Land development in Conservation Areas should
proceed only after receipt of appropriate Township
and/or state or federal permits, and where applicable, according to mitigation measures required
through the administration of federal, state, county
or Township ordinances.
4) Land uses requiring state and/or federal permits
(especially for wetland or floodplain alterations)
should not receive final Township approval until
satisfactory evidence has been submitted verifying
the acquisition of all other necessary permits.
5) If the land can be reasonably used without alteration of sensitive natural resources (at densities
otherwise permitted by local, state, and federal
regulations) then it should be used in this manner
without disrupting the sensitive areas.

It is expected that any flood-prone areas subsequently identified and mapped in the Township would
most likely fall within the Conservation Area.
Lands within the Conservation Area should only be
used for residential and passive recreation land uses.
Development densities within the conservation areas
should not exceed one dwelling unit per 20 acres on
average. This very low development density is applicable to only those instances where a parcel occurs
entirely within the limits of the Conservation Area. In
many cases there are significant portions of a parcel
which are upland, or otherwise outside of the Conservation Area boundaries. Future development should
occur on those portions of the property outside the

4-4
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Map 4-1 FUTURE LAND USE

. ,, ..
•:. ~--

~--- !•.:

::-

..
-.:::-·
..
....:•.·.
16&lt;,

..•. ····!.• .••

..:.._,.

~

.

-;

-·

1❖ :•::~

.........
t'···••:-~
•.;.·,· ~:

I

I

~

"
ConservatJon Area; conslatlng of all publicly and privately owned land within the Oak Grove
State Game Area boundaries, Including extensive areas of wetlands and hydric soils.
Conservation Area; consisting of wetlands and hydrlc soils situated outside of the
Oak Grove State Game Area boundaries.
Agricultural and Rural Residential Area
Suburban Residential Area
Lakes Residential Area; consisting of all rands immediately surrounding existing lakes
that are not Within the conservation area.

4-5
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Agricultural and Residential Development

dential Area's intended land use and development p~
tern is that an increase in the measures taken by . h 1
landowner (in regard to a proposed development pr~ ·
ject) to preserve the Township's rural character and
minimize negative public impacts should be accompanied by a comparatively higher permitted development density. In this fashion, a strong incentive would
then exist to develop land in the Township in a manner
that preserves the Township's current rural character.
Also, nearly all landowners of undeveloped land within
the Township would have available to them similar development options.

Overview
Agricultural land use is expected to be a dominant
land use for many years to come and this Plan calls
for its continuation as long as it is economically feasible to do so. However, residential development will
continue to be the predominant developed land use
throughout the Township. The permitted ~ensity_of future residential development, as established in the
Zoning Ordinance, will be based upon the natural limitations and suitability of the soils in the area proposed
for residential development (as represented by an
applicant obtaining the necessary permits from the
County Health Department), preservation of special
natural resources, preservation of important open
spaces, compatibility with adjacent land uses, and the
availability of adequate support services including, but
not limited to: safe and convenient access, healthy
water supply and septic waste disposal, and sufficie~t
police and fire protection. The general lack of pub~IC
sewer in the Township dictates an overall low density
residential development pattern. In addition, extensive
areas of the Township have severe limitations for
septic disposal if development were to occur on sma~I
lots, according to the published soil analysis of the Soll
Conservation Service.

Principal measures to be used in arriving at the
higher development densities include:
• the use of clustering and permanently designated open space of at least 50% or more of a
parcel's area;
• direct access to, or close proximity to, paved
roads but screening to prevent change to the rural character of the land abutting the road;
• provisions for fire protection infrastructure;
• public or community water and sanitary sewers,
and other measures to minimize excess demand
on the Township's limited public services system
and to protect the health, safety, and welfare ~
present and future Township residents.
l/or

A consideration guiding residential development
within the Township is the intention to allow for a variety of single family residential housing options, consistent with the character of the Township, in order to
better address varying lifestyle preferences, economic
considerations, and family orientation options
(including the elderly and young).

These or comparable measures would become
standards in the zoning ordinance. They would be
designed to regulate residential development and protect the public from potential negative impacts associated with the denser development.
A special emphasis on site design shouk:I be placed
on development that is proposed along all of the County
road network within the Township to better preserve the
rural attributes of these heavily traveled corridors and to
prevent road hazards from too many access points. More
cf1SCUssion of this emphasis is presented under ·Principal
Road Corridors,. later in this Chapter.

Agricultural and Rural Residential Area . . :
The Rural Residential Area covers the vast ma.10rity of the Township and provides opportunities for continued agricultural use as well as residential development within an open space, rural character setting. An
overall low, open space-based development density of
one dwelling unit per 2 to 20 acres will be encouraged
for dwellings within the Rural Residential Area due to
the lack of public sewer and water, the ger:ierallr poor
soils for septic systems in much of the Township, the
limited capacity of the predominantly unpaved roadway network, and the public's interest in protecting the
rural character of the Township.

OPEN SPACE ZONING: Guiding future residential development in a manner which maintains the rural
character of the Township is the primary challenge of
successful implementation of the Plan. A key element
of the strategy proposed, and an integral element of
the Agricultural and Rural Residential A~e.a, is ~he
addition of a new option to the Townships Zoning
Ordinance, often referred to as ,.open space zoning• or
•rural clustering ... This option permits and encourages
carefully designed small ,.open spac~,. d~velopmen~
to be established in the planned residential areas 1..
the Township according to standards established in

The specific permitted residential development
density associated with a particular parcel would depend upon the particular conditions present and the
development option a landowner wishes to pursul:.
The premise behind the Agricultural and Rural Res1-

4-6
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PI.J\N

�the Zoning Ordinance. This will allow the creation of
small lots (or alternatively, if done under the Condominium Act, "building envelopesj to site new residential structures in a cluster, or series of small clusters,
leaving the bulk of the property in permanent open
space (achieved through a permanent deed restriction
or conservation easements). Careful design will ensure thar the open spaces and rural character of the
Township are retained.

7) Destroying existing tree stands or hedgerows
especially along rights-of-way and betwee~
housing and active agricultural areas.
8) Fences on clustered lots within the development.

Reguire
1) Substantial buffering and screening for development near all public right-of-way on County
roads.

This option would permit, for example, a landowner to create 40 lots from an 80 acre parcel (if the
permitted development density is one lot per 2 acres)
and to make each lot 1/2 to 1 acre in size, clustered
into three to five groups to take advantage of the natural characteristics of the site. This will result in conversion of approximately 40 acres (including roads),
thereby leaving the remaining 40 acres for agricultural
or other nondevelopmental open space use. Scenarios
A and B in Figure 4-1 illustrate another example of a
traditional versus open space zoning development approach. In some situations, it may be desirable to require development via open space or cluster zoning
(such as property exclusively in sensitive environmental areas), but in most cases this would be a voluntary option. For example, the incentive could be established by permitting higher development densities
where the open space zoning development option is
selected by the landowner.

2) Preservation or enhancement
hedgerows and wooded areas.

4) Safe location and design of common sanitary
systems and storm water management structures that do not create nuisances.
5) Homeowner-managed recreation areas and
common spaces within larger clusters.
6) Covenants or easements to permanently protect the undeveloped open space areas that
remain after clustering is accomplished.
AGRICULTURAL LANDS: The Agricultural and
Rural Residential Area includes nearly all lands in the
Township currently being farmed. This Plan recognizes that farming plays an important role in the history
and character of Deerfield Township. It also recognizes that farming, as an industry, is becoming a more
difficult challenge in Deerfield Township due to a
number of factors including residential encroachment,
economic viability, and an increasing lack of younger
family members interested in continuing the family
farm operation.

1) Disturbing areas adjacent to floodplains, stream
buffer areas or wetlands.

This P~ encourages the continuation of all current
farming activities, irrespective of their location, as long as
it is economically viable to do so, adequate public
services for higher density development are not available,
and especially where the land is characterized by prime
agricultural soils. All typical farming activities, including the
raising of crops, the use of stables, silos, and barns, and
the operation of intensive livestock activities, should be
recognized as legitimate land uses provided that they met
Department of Agriculture requirements as •generally
accepted agricuhural land management practices,· and,
when located within the Suburban Residential Area,
special measures are taken to minimize conflicts with
adjoining nonfarm land use.

2) Developing on steep slopes.
3) Building on hilltops and ridges when development will be highly visible.
4) Siting houses on prime agricultural soils when
these can be part of a significant block of farm-

.

5) Placing numerous houses with access drives
along local and primary county roads or local
collector roads.

.
\

existing

3) Appropriate setbacks and/or buffering between
housing and existing or proposed active agricultural areas.

The following guidelines are a framework for a
new set of site development (zoning) regulations for
rural clustering for all of the land in the Agricultural and
Rural Residential Area.

~~-

of

6) Backing houses directly or visibly onto local
and primary county roads or local collector
roads.

Potential new residents considering living in the
Rural Residential Area of the Township should recognize that the traditional smells, noises, pesticide appli4-7

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�cations, and generally recognized agricultural activities
associated with farming may well continue on a long
term basis in this area of the Township and that the
Township does not consider such activities and operations as nuisances, but rather supports the Jong term
continuation of farming in the Township. Similarly, local developers and real estate agents should be made
aware of, and realize this intention of the Township
and disclose this intent to prospective buyers of land in
the Rural Residential Area.

Suburban Residential Area
The Suburban Residential Area covers the northeast region of the Township excluding buildable shoreline areas (see Lake Residential Area) and lands otherwise included in the conservation area. Similarly, this
area also covers lands in the area of Shannon Lake
excluding buildable shoreline areas. The Suburban
Residential Area provides opportunities for extensive
residential development of a more urban character
than suggested elsewhere in the Township. An
average density of up to 2 dwelling units per acre is
provided for in the Suburban Residential Area.
Principal measures to be used in arriving at the
higher development densities include:
• the use of clustering and permanently designated open space of at least 25% or more of a
parcel's area;
• direct access to paved roads;
• provisions for fire protection infrastructure;
• public or community water and sanitary sewers,
and other measures to minimize excess demand
on the Township's limited public services system
and to protect the heaJth, safety, and weHare of
present and Mure Township residents.
Like the Agricultural and Rural Residential Area,
the Suburban Residential Area encourages the utilization of the open space zoning concept to arrive at the
maximum development densities suggested for this
Area.
The Suburban Residential Area is currently characterized by some of the most urbanized areas of the
Township and it is the intent of the Suburban Residential Area to provide for the continuation of these existing uses and provide for their expansion in a reasonably compact manner. The general limits of the Suburban Residential Area around Lake Shannon were
established so as not to encroach upon Argentine
Road, but rather maintain a buffer between this
planned growth area and farm operations to the west.

Though it Is not the intent of the Suburban Resldentl~
Area to encourage the conversion of farmlands ef
rently existing within this Area, particularly in light ol
the fact that this Area is not characterized by extensive public services and infrastructure, it is the intent
of this Area to limit the introduction of new or expanded intensive livestock operations in this area, except under special conditions, in order to better accommodate the anticipated and intended residential
development densities planned for this Area.
POLICIES: The following policies, at a minimum, shall guide the use and development of
parcels and portions of parcels in the Agricultural
and Rural Residential Areas as well as in the Suburban Residential Areas:
1) Residential development should be limited by
appropriate zoning to a development density of not
more than one dwelling unit per 2 to 20 acres on average, in the Agricultural and Rural Residential Area,
and not more than two dwelling units per acre in the
Suburban Residential Area.
2) Site specific development densities should be
based upon the extent that special conditions may
prevail, the quality of the open space and rural character of the project and associated site plan, available
public services and infrastructure, and the degree ~
· which the project will impact the Township's roadwo
system and other public infrastructure and services.
3) Actual permitted lot size should be established
in the Zoning Ordinance based on the presence or
lack of sewers, type of road access, number of lots,
amount of open space, and related factors.
4) Minimum lot sizes should be, at a minimum,
adequate to accommodate septic systems (where
sewer is not available) as required by the Livingston
County Public Health Department.
.
5) Opportunities and incentives should be provided
within Township ordinances to encourage residential
development according to the open space/cluster
zoning principles discussed in this Plan and as
specified in the Zoning Ordinance.
6) Residential development should not occur on a
strip basis and should be appropriately sited, landscaped, and setback from all roadways, including
special provisions to maintain a rural character along
all segments of the County road network.
7) Residential development within the Agricultural
and Rural Residential Area, should be based upon ordinance provisions which limit the fragmentation of
open spaces and Township-wide natural resource systems.
8) Community sewer systems (also known as
cluster systems) shall be permitted provided reco~
mended maximum development densities are note.~_
ceeded by each development project and all neces4-8

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PL.AN

\

�cations, and generally recognized agricultural activities
associated with farming may well continue on a long
term basis in this area of the Township and that the
Township does not consider such activities and operations as nuisances, but rather supports the long term
continuation of farming in the Township. Similarly, local developers and real estate agents should be made
aware of, and realize this intention of the Township
and disclose this intent to prospective buyers of land in
the Rural Residential Area.

Though it is not the intent of the Suburban Residential
Area to encourage the conversion of farmlands currently existing within this Area, particularly in light of
the fact that this Area is not characterized by extensive public services and infrastructure, it is the intent
of this Area to limit the introduction of new or expanded intensive livestock operations in this area, except under special conditions, in order to better accommodate the anticipated and intended residential
development densities planned for this Area.

POLICIES: The following policies, at a minimum, shall guide the use and development of
parcels and portions of parcels in the Agricultural
and Rural Residential Areas as well as in the Suburban Residential Areas:
1) Residential development should be limited by
appropriate zoning to a development density of not
more than one dwelling unit per 2 to 20 acres on average, in the Agricultural and Rural Residential Area,
and not more than two dwelling units per acre in the
Suburban Residential Area.
2) Site specific development densities should be
based upon the extent that special conditions may
prevail, the quality of the open space and rural character of the project and associated site plan, available
public services and infrastructure, and the degree to
which the project will impact the Township's roadway
system and other public infrastructure and services.
3) Actual permitted lot size should be established
in the Zoning Ordinance based on the presence or
lack of sewers, type of road access, number of lots,
amount of open space, and related factors.
4) Minimum lot sizes should be, at a minimum,
adequate to accommodate septic systems (where
sewer is not available) as required by the Livingston
County Public Health Department.
5) Opportunities and incentives should be provided
within Township ordinances to encourage residential
development according to the open space/cluster
zoning principles discussed in this Plan and as
specified in the Zoning Ordinance.
6) Residential development should not occur on a
strip basis and should be appropriately sited, landscaped, and setback from all roadways, including
special provisions to maintain a rural character along
all segments of the County road network.
7) Residential development within the Agricultural
and Rural Residential Area, should be based upon ordinance provisions which limit the fragmentation of
open spaces and Township-wide natural resource systems.
8) Community sewer systems (also known as
cluster systems) shall be permitted provided recommended maximum development densities are not exceeded by each development project and all neces-

Suburban Residential Area
The Suburban Residential Area covers the northeast region of the Township excluding buildable shoreline areas (see Lake Residential Area) and lands otherwise included in the conservation area. Similarly, this
area also covers lands in the area of Shannon Lake
excluding buildable shoreline areas. The Suburban
Residential Area provides opportunities for extensive
residential development of a more urban character
than suggested elsewhere in the Township. An
average density of up to 2 dwelling units per acre is
provided for in the Suburban Residential Area.
Principal measures to be used in arriving at the
higher development densities include:

•

• the use of clustering and permanently designated open space of at least 25% or more of a
parcel's area;
• direct access to paved roads;
• provisions for fire protection infrastructure;
• public or community water and sanitary sewers,
and other measures to minimize excess demand
on the Township's limited public services system
and to protect the health, safety, and welfare of
present and future Township residents.
Like the Agricultural and Rural Residential Area,
the Suburban Residential Area encourages the utilization of the open space zoning concept to arrive at the
maximum development densities suggested for this
Area.

•

The Suburban Residential Area is currently characterized by some of the most urbanized areas of the
Township and it is the intent of the Suburban Residential Area to provide for the continuation of these existing uses and provide for their expansion in a reasonably compact manner. The general limits of the Suburban Residential Area around Lake Shannon were
established so as not to encroach upon Green Road,
but rather maintain a buffer be!}Y~t?ri\ this planned
growth area and farm o rcftlons to the west.
4-8

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

-from

k9ertti ne

1-/13

pu

P_ (:;rannavi

�sary state, county, and local permits are acquired, the
system is accepted by a public body and maintained
as a public system, and the system is constructed according to adopted standards by the Township to facilitate ease of tie-ins to potential future public systems
and measures are taken to ensure adequate financial
resources exist to maintain the system.

Lakes Residential Area
The Lakes Residential Area covers those shoreline
areas of the Township's lakes which are already developed or generally considered buildable and, conversely,
not included in the Conservation Area. The Lakes Residential Area is established in recognition of the extremely
fragile environments of the Township's sman lakes, the
role these water resources play in contributing to the desired character of the Township, and the particular challenges these resources present in regard to adjacent land
use management. The issue is fundamental: while the
Township's water resources are, and have been,
magnets for development, this development places
tremendous pressure upon the aesthetic, environmental,
and recreational values of the lakes. The threat to these
resource values is at risk due to degradation through
shoreline erosion, septic field leaching (where public
sewer is not available), sediment discharge, alteration of
the natural landscape, and excess use of surface waters
by water craft.

buildable portions of the Township's lakes at average
development densities of approximately one dwelling unit
per 3/4 acres, provided adequate on-site sewage disposal
could be assured where sanitary sewers are not
available. Development densities as high as one dwelling
unit per 1/2 acre could be permitted where a public or
community sewer system exists or is proposed. However,
the Lakes Residential Area places far more emphasis
upon the preservation and creation of shoreline open
spaces than is reflected by existing development patterns.
The presence of a sewerage system should not be
viewed as the only answer to concerns over sensitive
environments, water quality, and open spaces, as a
sewer system does not assure adequate open spaces,
the avoidance of pesticides and fertilizer laden runoff
entering the lakes, or a visually pleasing development
character. It is the intent of the Plan to encourage
lower density (density not to exceed one dwelling unit
per 3/4 acres) lakefront development where: 1) currently buildable vacant land is developed for residential
purposes; or 2) existing developed land undergoes
redevelopment, such as where several contiguous,
developed, lots are purchased and razed, and a new
structure(s) constructed.
REDEVELOPMENT: The Plan encourages the
renovation and/or redevelopment of those lakefront
residential areas which are or may become characterized
by deteriorating conditions of both a visual and/or structural nature. These concfitions do not support the intended
character of the Township, threaten the public health,
safety, and welfare, and negatively impact the use,
enjoyment and value of surrounding development. Similar
development densities as those recommended for new
development are recommended for redevelopment
projects where several contiguous, developed, lots are
purchased and razed, and a new structure(s)
constructed. Redevelopment of these areas should be
particularly sensitive to the preservation of open spaces,
provision of a ·naturalized" shoreline, and compatible
architectural styles. Wetlands and sensitive natural areas
adjacent to the inland lakes should be maintained as part
of the natural lake ecosystem.

Except for limited portions of Lobdell Lake and
Bennett Lake, and the majority of the shoreline of the
unnamed lake in Section 23, nearly all other buildable
shoreline areas in the Township have been developed.
Given this fact, the emphasis of the Lakes Residential
Area goes far beyond the establishment of guidelines
to shape future development of these undeveloped
lake areas but also to provide the necessary
guidelines to shape future redevelopment of the
existing developed areas. This may be particularly
applicable to portions of Lobdell, Ryan, and Bennett
Lakes where, though lots may be very narrow and/or
irregularly shaped, they may be of sufficient size to
provide adequate land area for additional dwelling
units (either through lot splits or redevelopment of
several lots in an integrated manner).

Increased lot widths and water setbacks are partlcu larly important in the redevelopment process. Many
of the older lots along Ryan, Lobdell, and Bennett
Lakes are 50 feet wide or less, and many dwelling
units are situated within 40 feet of the shoreline. This
development pattern is far more damaging to environmental ecosystems and resources.

NEW DEVELOPMENT: The present character of the
buildable land surrounding Deerfield Township's lakes is
nearly wholly residential. The Plan encourages the continuation of these uses but in a manner which more effectively recognizes the sensitive environmental qualities
embodied in these resources and their aesthetic and
recreational aspects. The Plan provides for future residential development along the remaining undeveloped yet

4-9
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Protection and Use of
Open Space Created by Clustering
Adapllld fra11 Iha Ho.wrd Co..nty, Matyland Plan. enllll8d The 1 IIQO Gen«al Plan: A Six Point Plan for the Future, adopted JUl'f 2, 19ll0.

Use of open space zoning or cluster zoning in Deerfield Township offers a very good opportunity for accommodating residential development while simultaneously preserving the quality of the environment, the
natural features of the rural landscape and working agricultural land. However, when an open space zoning
development is completed and its permitted density has been exhausted, there remains the question of how
best to ensure that the remaining open land is permanently and viably preserved.
When clustered lots are recorded, the remaining parcel would be identified on the plat or recorded with the
County Register of Deeds as limited to agricultural, recreational or related use. Covenants detailing restrictions
on the clustered lots and the remainder could also be recorded at the same time.
However, these remainders, permanently stripped of any future development rights, have the following
characteristics to be defined more fully in the Zoning Ordinance:
1) The open space created by rural clustering will, in almost all cases, remain private property, whereas
•open space• created by subdivision of a parcel is usually dedicated to the public or a homeowner's association and becomes a public responsibility.
2) The size of the open space created by rural clustering will result from application of performance standards to be included in the Zoning Ordinance.
3) The permanent stripping of development rights on the remainders created by rural clustering means they
can never be used for additional housing. Such land can be actively farmed, used for woodlots, nurser- ""ies, pasture, Q.r other uses related to farmland, or it may be used for certain recreation uses descnbed in
the Zoning Ordinance. These remainders must be recorded as lots or common lands whose uses do not
include future homes, stores, offices, or other buildings unrelated to the principal use of the designated
open space.
4) Remainders which meet the qualifications for such programs could be donated to an Agricultural Land
Preservation Program, a local Environmental Trust, Historic Trust, or other custodians of environmental
and landscape resources. The remainders would then be subject to the restrictions of these programs,
giving them an even stronger degree of protection than exists merely by the absence of development
rights.
5) In some cases the Township might wish to acquire the remainder as part of a public park, greenway or
greenbelt. However, the Township is under no obligation to accept as decficated open space any of the
remainders created by rural clustering. Indeed, it is the Township's preference to see these remainders
stay privately owned and managed in ways consistent with agricultural preservation and environmental
purposes that are the prime reasons for encouraging clustering.
6) Remainders to be designated for local recreation or common green space can be entrusted to the responsibility of a homeowner's association.
7) Unlike public open space which becomes a permanent responsibility of government agencies, the remainders created by rural clustering can be rented, leased or transferred to new owners, but such
leases, rentals or sales cannot restore any development rights.

4-10
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�KEYHOLE DEVELOPMENT: Keyhole, or funnel
development, should not be permitted. Keyhole development is the use of a waterfront lot as common open
space for waterfront access for dwelling units located
away from the waterfront. This results in potentially
greater lake use than would •normally" occur if the lot
were used for its intended use, such as a single family
residence. As surface water use increases, so does
the potential for shore erosion from speedboats and
water-skiers, loss in property values, oil and gas
spillage from powerboats, increased noise, conflicts
between lake users (sailboats, fisherman, swimmers,
etc.), and increased lake maintenance costs. Such
threats become that much greater when keyholing occurs with the digging of canals to increase lake frontage access to back lot residences. This form of development should be prohibited in the interest of preserving the water quality of the Township's lakes, protecting the public health, safety, and welfare, and preserving the lake and shoreline character of the Lakes
Residential Area.

POLICIES: The following policies, st a minimum, shall guide the development of, and redevelopment of, land within the Lakes Resident/al
Area:
1) Opportunities for new development and redevelopment shall be conditioned upon development
standards which address, at a minimum, consideration
of a potable water supply, safe disposal of septage,
water and land carrying capacities, water quality protection, preseNation of open space, minimal additional
intrusion upon the natural environment, and the
provision of adequate public access where applicable.
2) Development and redevelopment densities
should not exceed a development density of 2 dwelling
· units per acre where sewer is available, and 1 dwelling
unit per 3/4 acres where on-site sewage disposal is
practiced, unless the Public Health Department requires a /ewer development density due to larger required lot areas for permit approvals.
3) Approval of all development shall be contingent
upon, in part, the acquisition of all necessary permits
by the applicant tor the proposed project, including
permits administered through the Inland Lakes and
Streams Act, as may be applicable.
4) Establish deeper minimum shoreline setbacks
for all new structures to better preseNe the natural
shoreline landscape.
5) Adopt regulations to limit the grading and
clearing of shoreline areas.

High Density Residential Development
Up to this point in time, there has been no demonstrated need for the designation of lands to accommodate residential densities of greater than 2 dwelling
units per acre. A recently developed mobile home park
and the limited public services available in the Township, even in the area of Bennett Lake, limits the appropriateness of specifically designating any additional
area of the Township to accommodate higher density
residential development.
This Plan proposes that if it becomes apparent
that there is a demonstrated demand for additional
lands to be identified for higher density residential development opportunities, the Township will review
trends and conditions in the Township at that time and
determine if there exists suitable locations for such
uses. If appropriate locations can be identified, based
upon considerations including, but not necessarily
limited to: 1) available public services; 2) adequacy of
the transportation network; 3) planned capital improvements and the time frame for such improvements; and 4) existing and planned future land use
patterns, then this Plan would be amended to reflect
these new policies and the Township's Zoning Ordinance amended accordingly.

COMMERCIAL and INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT
The residents of Deerfield Township have voiced
their general satisfaction with the limited extent of
commercial and industrial facilities within the community and do not care to see these land uses indiscriminately encouraged, both in location and amount.
At the same time, there is and has been no demonstrated need to identify additional commercial and
industrial use areas to address a local or regional demand nor are there any locations in the Township that
are particularly well suited for commercial or i~ustrial
development. In addition, ample lands are available for
such uses in nearby communities. These land uses
typically require a high level of public services inc!uding public sewer and water, police an~ fire protectI0~,
and roadway infrastructure. Nowhere in the Tow~sh1p
does such a combination of service levels and_ suitab!e
vacant land exist. While service levels are highest in
the northern portion of the Township, particularly those
areas directly north of Bennett Lake, a predo~inantly
residential land use pattern has evolved and this P_l~n
supports the continuation of the character and stability
of these residential areas. While this Plan supports ~he
continuation of those commercial uses currently exist-

4-11
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�ing in the Bennett Lake area, this Plan does not support the conversion of new lands for commercial or industrial uses in this area which would have the effect
of, either incrementally or cumulatively, placing excessive demands on local public services and infrastructure, negatively impacting the surrounding residential character, or otherwise endangering the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
Rather, the Plan proposes that if it becomes apparent that there is a demonstrated demand for additional lands to be identified for subsequent commercial
and/or industrial development, the Township will review trends and conditions in the Township at that
time and determine if there exists suitable locations for
such uses. If appropriate locations can be identified,
based upon considerations including, but not necessarily limited to: 1) available public services; 2) adequacy of the transportation network; 3) planned capital
improvements and the time frame for such improvements; and 4) existing and planned future land use
patterns, this Plan would then be amended to reflect
these new policies and the Township's Zoning Ordinance amended accordingly.
POLICIES: The following policies, at a minimum, shall guide future commercial and industrial

development within Deerfield Township:
1) Existing cof!}mercially zoned land within the
Township shall be assured the opportunity to continue
to be used for commercial use.
2) Existing industrially zoned land within the
Township shall be assured the opportunity to continue
to be used for industrial purposes, provided the extent
to which such zoned lands are used for industrial purposes does not increase in intensity or character.
3) No new lands shall be designated for future
commercial and/or industrial use until the time when
this Plan is amended due to a demonstrated need for
such land uses in the Township and the identification
of appropriate locations for such uses in the Township
has been made.
4) The identification of an appropriate /ocation(s)
for potential future commercial and/or industrial land
uses shall be based on the following minimum considerations: a) a comprehensive review of trends and
conditions in the Township at the time the need is
identified; b) the policies of this Plan; c) the adequacy
of existing or planned services and infrastructure to the
area under consideration, at the time the proposed uses
will become operational, including sewage disposal, potable water, emergency services, stonn water management, and access to paved roads: and d) existing land
use patterns and anticipated conflicts.

5) No new lands will be zoned for commercial and/( \'"\
industrial use until this Plan is amended to support the ,.
tended rezoning, prior to the actual rezoning.
6) No commercial or industrial development or uses
should occur except in commercially or industrially zoned
districts, respectively, except a bonafide agricuhural use
or a use which qualifies as a home occupation and meets
the standards of the Township Zoning Ordinance.
7) Private utility systems may be const,ucted ff they
meet all Township, county, state, and federal requirements; and can be linked to future public utility systems,
including public sewer and water systems.
8) Potential future commercial and industrial development within the Township must recognize the cu"ent
,ural-like character of the Township and complement this
character through building scale, materials, and style, and
the provision of strategically located open spaces, and
minimize int,usion upon the natural landscape.

PUBLIC LANDS
With the provision of public services must come public ownership of land resources from which the services
originate, are maintained, and administered. The absence
of extensive public services provided by Deerfield
Township including public sewer and water, and ttJ.,.~._
Township's intention to continue to provide only limitC
public services (see Chapter 5), minimizes the need for
Township-owned land. current public lands administered
by the Township are limited to two cemeteries and the
land supporting the Township Hall. Except for recreational needs which wm be cftSCUssed below, this current
and limited Township-owned land appears reasonable
and adequate at this time. However, this need may
change as the Townsh~ grows. The Township recognizes that purchase of public lands can involve high acquisition costs, impacts upon adjacent land uses, and
public welfare issues associated with providing for selected services and infrastructure on a site.
POLICIES: The Township should only acquire
and develop future public lands where the proposed
acquisition or development meets the following circumstances:
1) responds to a demonstrated need for one or more
public facilities and/or services intended to co"ect an immediate or projected critical public heahh, safety, and
welfare condition or improve the overall quality of life in
the Township.
2) the site characteristics accommodate the proposed public use;
3) the use will not unreasonably impact adjacent la~
uses and waters; and

4-12
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�4) measures are taken to minimize negative impacts
upon adjacent land uses and waters.

minimum the most basic recreation needs of the inten_ded residents, as may be applicable, including
trails, playground equipment, picnic tables and
benches.
4) Site development of new residential and nonresidential land uses shall include provisions for trail
linkages with. and between. adjoining developments,
and public recreation facilities (including public trails)
where such facilities abut the proposed land use.
5) Future acquisition and development of recreation lands by the Township shall be based upon a coordinated Township-wide recreation plan approved by
the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
6) Prior to acquisition and development of public
recreation lands, the means to perpetually maintain
and operate any facilities on the property shall be established.

RECREATION LANDS
Recr~ational lands in Deerfield Towns hip are presently limited to the state maintained Oak Grove State
Game Area. The small and scattered population of the
Township creates difficulties for most private recreation
facilities from a marketing standpoint. The Township residents do not have the benefit of enjoying the recreational
opportunities typically associated with public school facilities given the total lack of such facilities in the Township.
At the present time the Towns hip does not operate
any park or recreation facilities. As the Township continues to grow, the demand for recreation opportunities can
be expected to grow as well. Though the Township is rich
in passive recreational resources, due to the presence of
the Oak Grove State Game Area, there is a complete
lack of more active recreational opportunities
(playgrounds, balffields, etc.) under local pubfic ownership
and public acquisition of Mure recreational sites may become necessary and desirable.
While Deerfield Township fully supports the value of
recreation opportunities within the community and the importance of individual. and family quality leisure time and
community image, the Township also recognizes land
used for recreational purposes can impact acf.13cent and
area-wide land uses as significantly (and in some cases
more so) as other land uses. As a result, new public or
private recreational land uses must be designed and operated so as to minimize negative impacts.
A key link in the planned recreation lands strategy of
the Township is the provision of open spaces in associa:.
tion with new development and the use of these open
spaces to address the recreational needs of the future
residents of these developments. These recreational
open spaces should be linked to Mure pubfic recreation
areas administered through the Township or other body
through recreational corridor systems and trails.

POLICIES: The following policies shall guide
the development of recreation lands In Deerfield
Township:
1) Proposed facilities shall be compatible with area
land uses.
2) Proposed facilities shall be compatible with the
natural site characteristics.
3) Site development of new residential land uses
of comparatively higher densities shall include provisions for recreation opportunities which address at a

SPECIAL LAND USES
There are a growing number of land uses which,
though they may be largely residential, commercial, or
industrial in character, present unique or special circumstances in regard to land use management. These
are typically regulated as special land uses in the
Zoning Ordinance. A special land use is a use which is
permitted only after a special review has determined
that the land use and associated site development
proposal meets special standards to assure its compatibility with both surrounding land uses and the other
permitted uses in the district. These unique or special
circumstances may be a result of traffic, noise, or visual or operational characteristics, which if unmitigated
could result in significant public or private nuisance.
Special land uses often include (but are not limited to)
day care facilities, airports, gravel pits, mobile home
parks, and multiple family projects.
Special land uses should be permitted in appropriate locations pursuant to specific standards and
review procedures established in the Zoning Ordinance. Approval should not be indiscriminate and
conditions should be imposed to minimize impacts on
surrounding lands. These standards shall accomplish
the following:
1) Assure that the design, construction, operation
and maintenance of land uses are in a manner
harmonious with the character of adjacent
property and the surrounding area.
2) Avoid inappropriate changes to the essential
character of the surrounding area.

4-13
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�3) Avoid interference with the general enjoyment
of adjacent property.
4) Improve the use or character of the property
under consideration and the surrounding area
in general, yet also be in keeping with the natural environment of the site.
5) Avoid negative impacts upon adjacent property
or conditions which will be · detrimental to the
health, safety, or welfare of persons or property
through the excessive production of traffic,
noise, smoke, odor, fumes or glare.
6) Assure availability of adequate essential public
facilities and services, or evidence that the person responsible for the proposed special land
use shall be able to continually provide adequately for the services and facilities deemed
essential to the special land use under consideration.
7) Avoid demands on public services and facilities
in excess of current capacity.
8) Assure consistency with the intent and purpose of
the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
Contrary to the past practices of the Township,
this Plan strongly discourages the issuance of special
use permits as a means of permitting what have subsequently resulted in disruptive commercial or industrial uses in residential areas, under the guise of

"home occupations".

The County road network is a fundamental er \.
ment of the Deerfield Township fabric. The vast majc.
ity of residents of the Township use the network daily.
These corridors, and the landscapes through which
they pass, formulate the principal visual image and
character of the Township among Township residents,
visitors and nonresident travelers. Because of both the
critical functional and visual role these corridors play
within the Township, the preservation of their rural and
scenic qualities is
paramount to successful
implementation of one of the key elements of the
Future Land Use Strategy. Achievement of this goal
will also protect public safety through regulated access
and controlled turning movements.
Future growth and development within the Township must be guided by measures which will assure
the efficient movement of traffic in a safe manner. An
increase in the number of access points along these
corridors, both for individual property access and for
intersecting roads, will result in a corresponding increase in the potential for congestion and traffic hazards and interfere with the intended function of these
corridors-the safe and efficient movement of traffic
between population centers. It would also undermine
the significant existing public investment in these
roads. Limiting direct access upon these corridors
spacing access points at appropriate distances,
providing acceleration and deceleration lanes will b'G .
necessary to insure the functional integrity of these
corridors as new land uses are established along
these corridors.

ae'

POLICIES: Special land uses In Deerfield

Township should be permitted only as provided
for:
1) in the appropriate provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
2) pursuant to both general standards (like those
above) and specific standards unique to the special
land use.

PRINCIPAL ROAD CORRIDORS
The Future Land Use Strategy described up to this
point establishes policies regarding the planned location
of land uses throughout the Township within the planning
period of this Plan, and policies regarcfing conditions upon
which site development should occur in support of the
proposed Mure land use pattern. There is, however, a
critical consideration, as part of the Future Land Use
Strategy, which is not specific to particular land uses but
rather to the principal roadway corridors, as characterized
by Argentine and Faussett Roads and the balance of the
County road network.

Similarty, Mure growth and development within the
Township must be guided by measures which will preserve, if not enhance, the landscape's visual quality along
these corridors. The future sense of rural character
throughout the Township will be, in large part, derived
from the visual landscape experienced when traveling
along these principal corridors-ft is from these corridors
which present and future residents see the vast majority
of the Township. The lack of effective measures to preserve these corridors in their current "rural" state will lead
to an urban-oriented corridor landscape and a dramatic
reversal of the Township's overall character. Assuring that
development along these corridors, to the extent that it
may occur, is appropriately set back from the roadway,
screened from view, and meets minimum driveway
spacing standards, is essential if the present character of
these corridors is to be preserved.

POLICIES: New development and redevelopment along the County's road network should
only be permitted according to deve/opmer-'\
standards which address, at a minimum:

4-14
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�1) Controlled and limited direct access onto thess
road.
2) Appropriate spacing between access points Is
assured.
3) Adequate acceleration and deceleration lanes.

4) Screening of structures and parking facilities,
and the uss of appropriate setbacks, to preserve and
enhance ths current character of these corridors.
5) The preservation of existing natural landscapes
along these corridors.

4-15
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Chapter 5

PUBLIC SERVICES STRATEGY
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

stantially far in advance of when such improvements
might best be targeted and implemented. Similarly,
while it is clear that the Suburban Residential Area is
planned to absorb some of the highest development
densities, it is quite unclear as to the rate of development which will occur in this Area and its implications
upon public service improvements.

The Future Land Use Strategy discussed in Chapter 4 describes the desired pattern of land development throughout the Township through the establishment of land uses and densities for areas with common characteristics. The Public Services Strategy described in this Chapter identifies the manner and degree to which public infrastructure and services are to
be provided within the Township to support the
planned future land use pattern. Public services and
related infrastructure include sewage disposal and potable water, roads and highways, police and fire protection, recreation, and general government services.

Accordingly then, the thrust of the Public Services
Strategy does not place as great an emphasis upon
targeting improvements to facilitate, or prepare for, the
planned development. Rather, it provides the parameters for making these future decisions in the form of
guiding policies.

The Public Services Strategy is based on the
principal of no new development occurring unless
concurrent with or after the public services necessary
to serve it are in place. This emphasis will, in effect,
place more burden upon the developer to finance (in
part or in whole) the necessary improvements if the
proposed densities dictate the need for improvements
and if the developer is unwilling to wait for the time
when the Township is able to schedule and fund the
necessary improvements.

As the character and feasibility of land development is directly impacted by the extent to which urban
or public services are available, the Public Services
Strategy works hand-in-hand with the Future Land Use
Strategy and is a critical element of the Township's efforts to control and guide future growth and development.

OVERVIEW OF
PUBLIC SERVICES STRATEGY

The Public Services Strategy consists of policies
which address future decisions regarding improvements to the Township's delivery of individual public
services in response to existing conditions and anticipated needs. These policies formulate the manner by
which, and conditions upon which, future improvements should be made regarding public services.

Basis
The Future Land Use Strategy presented in the
previous chapter provides the Township residents with
considerable flexibility in the development of property
in regard to development densities. The Agricultural
and Rural Residential Area, which covers the vast
majority of the Township area, provides for average
development densities ranging from as low as 1
dwelling per 20 acres or more, to as dense as 1
dwelling unit per 2 acres. While these development
options are purposeful and provide the Township with
flexibility to effectively preserve the rural character and
natural resources of the Township, this same flexibility
provides added challenges for the Township to effectively plan for public service improvements in advance.
Specifically, the permitted range in development density does not provide the Township with a definitive
geographic area that can clearly be anticipated to develop with the greatest intensities, or at the fastest
rate. Thus it becomes that much more difficult to target specific areas for public service improvements as
actual development densities will not be known sub-

Township-Wide Public Services Pattern
The Public Services Strategy calls for a future
public services pattern not very different than the current pattern in the Township. The vast majority of the
Township is proposed to receive limited expansion of
those services currently available. It is expected that
the gravel roadway network will continue to dominate as
will the reliance upon on-site potable water and sewage
disposal.

5-1
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�INDIVIDUAL PUBLIC
SERVICE COMPONENTS

network, which greatly reduces traffic flow capaci~
the Township's roadway infrastructure fulfills its fu ll\
tion fairly well. This is due, in large part, to three con:"'""
ditions: 1) the existing very low development density
throughout the vast majority of the Township; 2) the
presence of paved roads in that area of the Township
where development densities are considerably higher;
and 3) the presence of Argentine, Faussett, and portions of Bennett Lake Roads, paved County primary
roads which accommodate the vast majority of the local north-south and east-west traffic flow in the Township. This last condition, in combination with the limited opportunities for continuous north-south or eastwest movement across the Township, is of particular
significance as the vast majority of the road segments
in the Township do not encourage or support crosstownship travel by commuters residing outside of the
Township. The existing road network would suggest
that, except for the main corridors such as Argentine
Road and Faussett Roads, the Township experiences
comparatively limited use of its roadway network by
non-residents.

Roads And Streets
Overview
As new residential land uses, and possibly new
commercial and industrial land uses in the more distant future, are introduced into the Township, the need
for a roadway network able to accommodate the increased traffic demand increases. This is particularly
true in Deerfield Township where a rural road network
predominates and is not currently capable of adequately accommodating significant increases in traffic
flow. The additional rural residential development anticipated in this Plan, despite its over~II low densi~,
will result in higher traffic levels and will eventually increase the impact on these roads, ultimately requiring
some improvement-or risk congestion, vehicular and
pedestrian hazards, longer travel time, higher auto
"wear and tear," and a general decrease in the quality
of road service.

CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE: The number
of daily car trips a gravel roadway can accommodate
before users perceive evidence of regular and persistent traffic flow and safety problems, as identified by
the Livingston County Road Commission and Livin f \
ston County Planning Department, is about 75 dah)
trips on unpaved roads where the roadway base and
drainage are inadequate and 450 daily trips on unpaved roads where the roadway base and drainage is
adequate.

Conversely, it must be recognized that an improved roadway network may well attract new or e~panded intensive land uses which, in tum, place additional demand on the infrastructure network. Such
change must be managed so that the rate of land use
change does not overtax the ability of the Township
and County to make the necessary improvements.
The Road and Streets component of the Public Services Strategy seeks to assure that land development
does not occur in a manner which will sacrifice the
public health, safety, and welfare due to inadequate
roadway infrastructure nor prematurely encourage
changes in land uses.

As the average household produces 1O vehicle
trips daily, and most of the unpaved roads in the
Township have an inadequate base, a stretch. of
gravel road in the Township with more than 7 dwelh~g
units is apt to be characterized by regular and persistent maintenance problems. Even though recent traffic
counts have not been recorded for most of the
Township's gravel roads, residential lot split patterns
suggest the high likelihood of traffic counts exceeding
75 trips per day on many of the Township gravel
roads.

Analysis
The present roadway network pattern of Deerfield
Township is similar to most Michigan townships, with a
fairly extensive mile grid pattern. However, comparatively few roads in the Township run continuously
across the Township in a north-south or east-west direction. In addition, while the number of roadway miles
is considerable, approximately 80% of the roadway
miles are unpaved. Even with this extensive gravel

5-2
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�-

u
N

p

A

V
E

ROAD TYPE

Inadequate base,
surface and drainage

Table 5-1
PERCEIVED ROAD CONDITION
BY
NUMBER OF DAILY CAR TRIPS
BEGIN TO SEE
GOOD CONDIFLOW AND
TION MOST OF
MAINTENANCE
YEAR
PROBLEMS
less than 25
25-75

REGULAR AND
PERSISTENT
PROBLEMS
greater than 75

Adequate base,
surface and drainage

less than 150

150-450

greater than 450

Sealcoat surface,
adequate base and drainaoe
Plant mix surface, adequate
base and drainage

less than 250

250-1,000

greater than 1,000

less than 2,500

2,500-5,000

greater than 5,ooo·

D

p
A

V
E
D

Source: LMngsl0n County Planning Department, LMngston County Road Commission
• This volume can be higher where the shoulder is wide and so/Id, and the right-of-way Is lcept clear of vegetation.

This will also enable the Township to pursue effective
long range planning to assure the necessary
improvements are appropriately programmed into the
Township's future capital improvements programs.

It is very difficult to definitively identify the existing
levels of service provided by the majority of the Township's road segments due to the lack of recorded traffic counts along most of the gravel segments and
some of the paved segments, and the, at times, circuitous nature of the roadway network and resulting difficulty in projecting distribution of traffic flows. Based
upon the most recent recorded traffic counts for the
Township's paved roads and Table 5-1, it is reasonable to conclude that the Township's paved roads are
all accommodating considerably less than 5,000 car
trips per day and that there generally exists a reasonable level of service along these corridors.

FUTURE IMPLICATIONS: As the Township continues to grow and develop according to the land use
policies contained in this Plan, traffic volumes will increase and further threaten the current levels of service along all of the roads. Based upon a buildout of the
Township at an average of one dwelling unit per 2
acres, which approximates the majority of the planned
maximum development density for the Township, an
increase of approximately 8,000 dwelling units would
be witnessed. This increase in dwelling units over the
current number of approximately 1,100 dwelling units
would result in approximately 80,000 or more additional trips per day in the Township and would bring
the Township's current roadway network to a complete
shut-down.

It is doubtful that the same can be generally said
for the gravel segments in the Township as evidenced
by the few cases where traffic counts have been recorded. For example, recorded traffic counts along
unpaved Wiggins Road north of Faussett Road are
more than six times the maximum recommended flow
according to Table 5-1. The same can be said forcertain segments of Center Road as well.

Capital improvement programming on the part of
the Township and County Road Commission can help
mitigate some of these impacts and prevent serious
threats to public health and safety. Road improvements should respond to areas of greatest need based
upon the criteria established in the first policy (following section).

For the successful implementation of the following
Roads and Streets policies, it is necessary (to the
greatest extent possible) to establish the current level
of service associated with each roadway segment.
This will facilitate identification of current roadway
improvement needs and identify those improvements
which are fundamental to the advancement of the land
use policies and public service strategy of this Plan.
5-3

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Policies

assist in the identification of priority improv~
ments

r ,,

The following policies are intended to guide Deerfield Township officials on future decisions regarding
improvements to the Township's vehicular circulation
network and in response to new traffic demands associated with proposed land uses:
.
1) Deerfield Township will strive to improve the
Township roadway network, as financial resources become available, based upon the following guidelines:

3) The Township will coordinate with the Livingston
County Road Commission to identify needed
improvements and the perceived relative priority
of such improvements.
4) Proposed land uses and site development projects larger than a single family home on an individual lot will be analyzed in regard to traffic
impacts and roadway improvements.
5) The Township should achieve a balanced
transportatioNland use system which includes
an adequate number of roads and streets of
appropriate capacity to accommodate land use
traffic patterns.

a. Greatest priority for road improvements will
be assigned to those road segments whose
current conditions present imminent danger
to the public health and safety of Township
residents. Such dangerous conditions include roadway impasses and flooding.

6) The Township will develop standards to regulate
new development along roadway corridors to
minimize negative impacts of such development
including but not limited to poorly sited and/or
designed access, and too many points of
access.

b. Functional classification of roads shall dictate the priority of improvements when all
other conditions are generally equal. The
functional importance of the various roads in
the Township, from highest to lowest, is as
follows: 1} county primaries; 3) county locals; and 4} minor roads (subdivision roads).

8) Subdivisions platted according to PA 288 of
1967 are encouraged because the new roads
must be built to County Road Commission
standards.
~

c. Where imminent danger is not a factor,
county local gravel roads shall only be
paved based upon the following considerations: 1) there is general consensus among
residents living along the road segment for
such paving; 2) the costs to maintain a
gravel road become excessive compared to
the long term costs of paving a road,
thereby threatening the financial stability of
the Township, and Township residents are
unwilling to pay additional taxes to cover the
maintenance costs; 3) a 30 unit or larger
development approaching a density of 1
dwelling unit per 2 acres is proposed, in
which case approval of such a project will be
withheld until such time that arrangements
are made for the paving of that portion of
the road segment which abuts the project
site prior to the time when the use becomes
operational.

9) Development of private roads, whether lot by ~.
or via the Condominium Act, PA 59 of 1978,
must be built to County Road commission
cross-sectional standards unless otherwise
provided by the Zoning Ordinance.
10) All future residential structures along all
County primary and county local road shall be
setback at least 100 feet from the road or ramp
right-of-way, or if the road right-of-way is not
known, 130 feet from the center line of the road.

Sewer and Water

Overview
As is often typical among rural communities, the
vast majority of Deerfield Township residents rely
upon septic systems and private wells for sewage disposal and potable water. However, improperly operating septic systems can contaminate potable groundwater resources, inland lakes and streams, and pose
public health threats to those using the contaminated
resources.

d. The extension of road improvements near
or through the Oak Grove State Game Area
and other environmentally sensitive areas
shall be strongly discouraged.
2) The Township shall strive to obtain and maintain
current traffic counts throughout the entire
Township and, upon the development of a
Township-wide traffic count profile, establish a
level of service rating for each road segment to

As land development densities increase, so do~
the need for public sewer and water. Industrial, co~
mercial, and higher density residential land uses gen-

5-4
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�erally have greater sewage disposal and water
(potable and otherwise) needs than can often be met
by traditional on-site facilities. Failure to provide adequate sewer and water facilities to these land uses can
lead to severe health and environmental consequences while the premature provision of these services can _lead to unmanaged growth and land development.

minimum design standards of future public sewer and
water systems.
OPTIONS FOR FUTURE PUBLIC SEWER AND
WATER SERVICES: Future public sewer and water
opportunities may be generally considered to include
newly constructed systems administered by Deerfield
Township, the expansion of the Bennett Lake public
sewer system, or community sewer systems established as public systems within a sewer service drainage district and operated and maintained by the Livingston County Drain Commission (especially if around
an inland lake}.

The Sewer and Water component of the Public
Services Strategy provides policies and standards, in
conformance with the Future Land Use Strategy and in
the interest of the community's health, safety, and
public welfare, to guide the use and applicability of onsite sewage disposal, potable water sources, and the
provision of public sewer and water facilities.

Each of these options, and the relative feasibility
of each, presents its own set of advantages and disadvantages. While it is not the intent of the Public
Services Strategy to encourage either one of these
options over the others, it is important to recognize
that these potential opportunities exist and they should
serve as a basis, in part, for the policies of the Public
Services Strategy.

Analysis
Less than 1% of the Township's surficial soils present only slight limitations to septic systems, and
these areas are both scattered and fragmented. The
balance of the Township presents moderate/severe to
severe limitations to septic systems. These conditions
highlight the critical relationship between land use,
development densities, and on-site sewage disposal
and potable water. Because of the considerable
Township-wide limitations toward septic systems and
yet the Township-wide use of this type of sewage disposal process and R_rivate wells for potable water, the
public health, safety, and welfare is always at risk. Already there exists sites throughout the Township
which have documented high nitrate levels in area
wells.

COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEMS: Community
sewer systems provide an alternative to the traditional
large public sewer systems operated by municipalities.
Community sewer systems are sewage disposal systems which are typically privately constructed, serve
two or more dwelling units, and are constructed to
provide sewage disposal to all dwelling units in the development project. These systems can vary in technology, ranging from a community septic field to a
packaged treatment facility. Such systems can also be
used to service nonresidential uses.

These and related threats to the public welfare will
only increase as the Township grows and develops
unless specific measures are taken. These measures
must address the assurance of adequate on-site sewage disposal practices including, in some cases, the
provision of public sewer and water. Deerfield Township is not currently serviced by public sewer or water
except for a public sewer system near Bennett and
Lobdell Lakes. Up to this point in time, the need for
such public services has been limited, but the need
may well increase.

Deerfield Township strongly discourages the use
of community sewer systems. Such systems will provide for the highest development densities permitted
by the Zoning Ordinance on a Township-wide basis
and this development pattern is not consistent with the
Future Land Use Strategy, the desired future character of the Township, and the efforts of the Township to
manage growth.
The single exception where community sewer systems may be considered a reasonable alternative for
sewage disposal is when such systems are within the
Suburban Residential Area and where ultimate responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the
systems fall under the jurisdiction of a public agency.

It is not the intent of the Public Services Strategy
to suggest expanded public sewer and/or water is a
necessity within the Township within the 20 year planning period of this Plan. It is the intent of this Plan,
however, to establish: 1) the planning principles upon
which the expansion or introduction of new systems
should be based; 2) conditions delineating to what extent future land uses should be required to have access to a public sewer and/or water system; and 3)

Policies
Deerfield Township will be guided by the following
policies in striving to assure adequate sewage disposal and potable water in the Township:

5-5
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PL.AN

�1) All on-site sewage disposal and potable water
facilities shall be constructed and maintained in
accordance with the requirements and standards of the Livingston County Public Health
Department and Michigan Public Health Department as well as those of other applicable local, county, state or federal agencies.
2) No land uses or land development projects will
be permitted if any applicable regulations regarding on-site sewage disposal and potable
water facilities can not be met and public sewer
and water services are not available.
3) Any future decision by the Township to provide
public sewer and water services beyond those
which currently exist in the Township shall be
based upon an in-depth analysis of all available
options, including services provided through cooperative agreements with neighboring municipalities.
4) Any public sewer and water services, aside
from community systems, shall be provided in
the Township only where the public welfare is
threatened due to discovered environmental
hazards or after this Comprehensive Plan has
been thoroughly reviewed and updated to identify; 1) a planned future land use pattern which
necessitates re/lance upon such a system; and
2) a logical phasing of infrastructure and service
areas to limit rapid development and growth.

9) The Township will develop a wellhead protection
zone around any future municipal wells a~
establish zoning regulations to prevent leakw
and spills, or discharges of hazardous substances that might contaminate groundwater.

Stormwater Management
Overview
As the land surface is covered by buildings, parking lots and other impermeable surfaces, the quantity
of stormwater runoff increases. The soils and vegetated landscape which previously absorbed and
slowed much of the water associated with storms are
gone. Unless specific preventive measures are taken,
these conditions encourage increases in runoff flow,
soil erosion, sedimentation and pollution of area water
resources, and flood potential. Though these conditions originate from site-specific circumstances, their
impact can extend to the entire community and communities beyond if within the same watershed. Inadequate management of stormwater produced due to
land development and urbanization threatens the public health, safety, and welfare through life threatening
flood conditions, contamination of groundwater resources, deterioration of water-based recreation facili-

ties, and damage and loss of property values. In co~
trast, stormwater management aims to minimize flcx.i:.__
conditions, and ensure the quality of runoff which is
collected and ultimately discharged into the watershed
system (streams, rivers, wetlands, lakes, etc.) is adequate.

5) Any future expansion of a sewer and/or water
service area, and associated infrastructure,
shall be established in a phased manner so as
not to open up too great a land area to new and
higher density development at one time.

Analysis
Though stormwater management should be a
concern of all communities (and increasingly is because of federal and state regulations), the natural topography of Deerfield Township presents particular
challenges in this regard. Though the rolling, and at
times steep, topography of the Township minimizes
the propensity for area-wide flooding, it also greatly
facilitates soil erosion and sedimentation when soils
are exposed. Unnecessary sedimentation threatens
wetlands and streams, plus the lakes in the Township.
The anticipated residential growth and development to
occur in the Township in future years will increase the
amount of impervious land cover and disturbance of
sloped areas. This development has the potential to
alter existing hydrological systems to the point where
the public health, safety, and welfare may be at risk if
concentrated in certain areas. This is particularly true
in the planned Suburban Residential Area where a
more intensive land use pattern is provided for.
~

6) All land uses and land development projects
must be serviced by public sewer and water infrastructure if the infrastructure abuts the property in question.
7) The provision of public sewer and water shall be
based upon conformance with level of service
standards where adopted by those municipalities individually or jointly providing the service to
Deerfield Township.
8) Community or package sewer systems will be
permitted by the Township provided the treatment capabilities of the package system provides a tertiary level of treatment, the system is
built to, operates, and is maintained accc,rding
to a/I local, county, state, and federal standards,
and the project site is located within the Suburban Residential Area.

5-6
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Policies
The following policies will guide the Township in
adequately controlling the quality and quantity of
stormwater runoff associated with the introduction of
new land uses.

fire and police protection services, and associated land
and buildings, are available to provide for both the exis!in~ and !Uture welfare of residents and property
within Deerfield Township.

Analysis
1) Pr9posed land uses will not be permitted if and
where the level of service currently provided by
existing stormwater management infrastructure
and/or existing drainage patterns would be decreased, unless necessary improvements to
such infrastructure or natural drainage are first
made.

Deerfield Township currently relies on the Livingston County Sheriff's Department in Howell and the
State Police in Brighton for police protection. Fire protection is provided by the City of Howell and the
Townships of Hartland and Argentine.
Specific standards upon which to evaluate the
level of police protection in Deerfield Township do not
exist due to the high number of variables that impact
police protection needs. The limited commercial, industrial, and high density residential development in
the Township greatly reduces the need for a level of
police protection typically associated with a geographically smaller and more urbanized community of similar
population size. As a whole, Township residents are
generally satisfied with the current level of police protection services. These services are limited to a single
patrol car cruising the Township for four hours per
weekday. 24-hour protection and weekend protection
is not contracted for, and the State Police must be
contacted should the need arise.

2) The current level of service may vary from one
site to another but will be generally defined as
the rate, total volume, and quality of stormwater
runoff prior to new site development activities.
3) All new and existing land uses must comply with
all county, state, and federal regulations regarding stormwater management and soil erosion,
including those regulations of and administered
by the Livingston County Drain Commissioner.
4) All proposed and existing land uses situated on
sites which reflect slopes of 12°/4 or greater
shall take and maintain aggressive measures to
prohibit the erosion of soils and sedimentation.

Though a significant portion of the Township does
not fall within the American Insurance Association's
recommended four mile optimum service radius for
buildings having an average separation of 100 feet or
more, the vast portion of the Township does fall within
the National Board of Fire Underwriters' recommended
1a-minute response time for "closely built" and
·scattered residential· areas. However, the lack of
public water infrastructure in the Township is a significant obstacle to comprehensive fire protection.

--

Support Services and Buildings
Overview
Support services, as referred to within this Plan,
includes all the public services a community may provide to its residents above and beyond sewer, water,
roads and streets. In particular, these services include
police and fire protection and general government
services such as tax assessment, cemetery care, and
governance services. The reference to these services
as support services ls not intended to suggest that
they are of secondary importance but simply that they
are of a different type than sewer, water, and roadway
services.

As the Township relies on other agencies for fire
and police protection, the Township itself does not
maintain any land or capital facilities for these purposes. However, though the Township's current
agreements for police and fire protection services do
not suggest the need for the purchase of land by the
Township during the next 20 years, the need for increased service levels may well rise. Future growth in
the Township may jeopardize current levels of service
as emergency conditions will arise more frequently,
placing additional demand on the agencies providing
these services.

As community growth and land development increases, so does the demand for these services. For
example, police and fire protection must be extended
to more individuals, families, and properties. Similarly,
as the demand for these services increase, so does
the need for support services administration and the
need for property and buildings from which these
services are administered.

Policies
The following policies will guide the Township in its
pursuit of maintaining, and as necessary, improving

The Support Services and Buildings component of
the Public Services Strategy is intended to assure that

5-7
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�The Recreation component of the Public Services
Strategy is a plan for identifying and addressing the
recreation needs of the Township. This strategy be- "·
comes the tool for identifying future recreation lands
and the recreation services associated with these
lands. However, it is recogn ized a more detailed
analysis and plan is necessary to qualify for state or
federal assistance with future recreational facility development.

the level of service for general government, police, fire
and emergency services:

'l"

1) The Township will maintain agreements with
adjoining municipalities for fire service equal to
the quality of service in place at adoption of this
Plan with the aim to improve this rating.
2) The Township will continue to monitor police
protection needs and service provided by the
County Sheriffs Department, and State Police
and if necessary, explore the development of a
service agreement with one or more area police
protection agencies for a higher level of service.

Analysis
Deerfield Township is extremely limited in the area
of programmed recreational resources within its municipal limits. There are no public recreation lands
administered by the Township or other agency except
the Oak Grove State Game Area. The most fundamental of public recreational facilities , school playgrounds, are nonexistent due to the absence of school
facilities in the Township.

3) The Township will continue to monitor other
emergency services needs, such as ambulance
assistance, and explore the development of a
service agreement with one or more area police
protection agencies for a higher level of service.
4) The Township will continue to meet the basic
governance needs of its citizens in existing facilities, until a demonstrated need for more
service and adequate financial resources are
available to meet that need. Expansions and/or
the construction of new facilities will be on the
site of existing Township owned lands, except
possibly for new recreational facilities which may
require purchase of new lands.

While the extent of recreational facilities in the
Township is minimal, the degree to which the lack of
these facilities reflects a condition of inadequacy is
unclear at this time. The reason for this lack of clarity is
that adequacy is, in part, determined by the attitudes of
the Township residents in regard to their particular
recreation needs and likes. Up to this time, a survey of ~
resident attitudes on the amount of recreation •'.
opportunities in the Township has not been pursued.
,. -

5) The Township will explore the feasibility and
practicality of public and/or private development
of dry hydrant systems in connection with development around the Township's lakes and,
where shown to be feasible and practical, establish standards and requirements for the construction of such systems.

However, a definite state of inadequacy is apparent according to recreation standards adopted by the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources. The
standards identify the minimum number of suggested
recreation facilities, by facility type, based upon a
community's population. The standards are presented
as guidelines and not as absolute "hard and fast rules. n
Standards applicable to a community the size of
Deerfield Township suggest inadequacies relative to
facilities for ball fields, court games, picnic areas,
playgrounds, hiking trails, snowmobile trails, and more.
Most evident is the total lack of local park land in the
Township, irrespective how it may be programmed.
MDNR standards suggest approximately 30 acres of
park land for a community the size of Deerfield
Township, or 10 acres for every 1,000 people.

Recreation Strategy
Overview
Deerfield Township recognizes that the health of
its residents is, in part, impacted by the quality of opportunities available for spending leisure time. The
Township further recognizes that a critical consideration in this regard is the type of recreational facilities
nearby and available to the residents of the Township.
Demands for recreational opportunities increase with
population growth and available land resources for
recreation decrease as residential and other land uses
consume greater amounts of what was previously
open space and potential outdoor recreation land.
Recreational lands must be purposefully pursued and
planned for, as with any other principal land use, if
these uses are to be appropriately located within the
community and provide the services in demand.

While the standards suggest inadequacies ranging
from slight to severe, the public's perception of
inadequacy is not clear. The rural character of the
Township may provide for recreational needs at individual homes or through nearby recreational programs
and facilities in other communities. However, not all ~

5-8
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

\

�Township residents live on, or have access to, large
land parcels, woodlots, and similar potential outdoor
recreational opportunities. On the whole, the Township
may not be meeting a significant degree of its citizens
recreational needs and actions should be initiated to
find out, and, if so, to correct the situation.

Policies
The following policies will guide the Township in its
pursuit of an improved recreational environment:
1) The Township may determine, approximately
every five years, the extent to which area residents are unsatisfied with recreation opportunities in the Township through the use of suNeys,
public meetings, and/or inteNiews with residents.
2) The Township will strive to provide recreation
facilities in a manner which recognizes the particular recreation needs expressed by its residents.

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COORDINATION
Overview
Contrary to decades past when access between
communities was several days travel by stagecoach
and the activities of one community had little impact
upon the quality of life of other communities, we now
live in an environment of microcomputers, vehicular
and mass transit, telecommunications, and urban
sprawl. We often live in one community, work in a
second, shop in a third, and our children attend school
in still a fourth. Roadway corridors, employment centers, and retail trade centers link the activities of one
community to the next and beyond. Similarly, the
growth and development patterns of an individual
community can easily and directly impact growth and
development in adjoining and nearby communities .
As a result of this regionalism, a community does
not exist unto itself but is intrinsically linked with the
activities of communities beyond. This dictates the
need for communities to cooperate and coordinate
community planning and public service endeavors if
maximum benefits are to be realized. The Intergovernmental Coordination component of the Public
Services strategy establishes the framework within
which Deerfield Township will realize the benefits of
coordination with area municipalities and agencies.

3) Should sufficient public sentiment warrant, the
Township will pursue the development of a
MDNR-approved five year action plan which will
provide a specific action plan aimed at providing
recreation facilities desired by Township
residents and enable the Township to compete
for state and federal recreation development
monies.

Analysis

4) The Township will adopt incentives to encourage the provision of open space and recreation
areas within future development projects.

Deerfield Township exists within a web of regional
forces which must be recognized and addressed
through coordinated planning with area municipalities
and agencies. Deerfield Township is centrally situated
within the Detroit, Flint, Lansing, and Ann Arbor metropolitan areas, is afforded excellent a?cess to and from
these major urban centers, and relies on these and
other urban centers for employment and retail services. The Township's regional link is bolstered by its
position near the path of expanding urban sprawl from
the greater Detroit region. Still, th_e nume:ous day-today activities of the Towns~ip which
impacted b~
non-township offices, including the_ L1~ingston Coun!}
Road Commission, Drain CommIss1on , and Public
Health Department. further exemplifies the critical
need for intergovernmental coordination.

5) The Township will encourage ease of access to
future recreation facilities though the pursuit of a
linked open space system, siting recreation
lands with recognition of existing and future
primary population centers, and facilitating
movement to and within future recreation facilities for motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and
the physically disabled.

_a:e

6) The Township will improve and coordinate efforts with all levels of government, with the
quasi-public sector, and the privat(J sector to
provide expanded and coordinated recreational
opportunities.

Policies
The following policies will guide the Township in
more effectively carrying out its municipal activitie~
and responsibilities within the regional context that ,t
operates from:

5-9
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE Pl.AN

�1) Deerfield Township will encourage a program
whereby all adjacent communities and the
County are provided the opportunity to comment on amendments to the Township's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance. Subdivision
Ordinance, capital improvements plan, and relate&lt;j ordinances and programs of the Township
which may have impacts on services or land
use decisions of adjoining jurisdictions.
2) Deerfield Township will encourage opportunities
for comment by adjoining jurisdictions on any
development project within 1000 feet of the
edge of the Township and will formally request
area municipalities to permit Township comment
on any development project within 1000 feet of
their borders.
3) Deerfield Township will encourage the development of an intergovernmental coordination
committee, composed of area municipalities and
county agencies. aimed at addressing comprehensive planning issues including the impacts of
land development and coordinating planning
and zoning programs.
4) Deerfield Township will encourage the coordination of public services to serve the Township
and surrounding areas in the most practical and
economically feasible fashion and in accord with
the policies previously set forth.

5-10
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Appendix A

LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHY
Deerfield Township is situated in the northeast
central portion of Livingston County, which is located
between Oakland and Ingham Counties on the fringe
of southeast Michigan and the Greater Detroit Area.
(see Rgure A-1). Deerfield Township is surrounded by
the Townships of Cohoctah to the west: Oceola to the
south; Tyrone to the east, and the Township of Argentine in Genesee County to the north. The US-23 expressway and 1-96 Interstate Highway are within two to
seven miles of the Township, respectively, and serve
as major regional connectors to employment centers
in Detroit, Ann Arbor, Flint, and Lansing (see Rgure A1).

TYRONE

MARION

GENOA

Brighton

Deerfield Township's location relative to transportation routes and employment centers has made it an
increasingly popular place to live. A pastoral setting,
highlighted by expansive farm fields and interspersed
with woodlots, wetlands, several lakes, and rolling topography fuels the draw this Township presents as urbanization moves steadily closer. The largest of the
Township's lakes, Bennett Lake, in the northeast corner of the Township, and Lake Shannon, in the far

UNADIUA

PUTNAM

r

HAMBURG

Figure A-2

Figure A-3

Figure A-1

A-1
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

GREEN OAK

�east central area of the Township, are also the most
urbanized. Several other smaller and far less developed lakes exist within the Township Including a chain
of lakes located within the state administered Oak
Grove State Game Area, situated in the northwest
quarter of the Township and extending into Cohoctah
Township (see Figure A-3). Both small and expansive
areas of woodlands and wetlands are situated
throughout nearly all areas of the Township.

A-2
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Appendix B

HISTORIC PE~SPECTIVE
HISTORIC PERSPECTIVE

The first post-office in Deerfield Township was established in 1837-38. It was intended to call the office
by the name of the town, but the department having
already established an office in Lenawee County under that name, issued a commission to Alfred Holmes
as postmaster of "Deer Creek"post-office.

The history of Livingston County 1 provides insight
into the early history of Deerfield's development. Portions of this text taken directly from these materials are
italicized.

,'

Deerfield Township provided excellent hunting
grounds for area Indian groups but none chose to establish a village within the limits of the Township. The
first settler within the Township was John How. He
emigrated from England to the United states in 1820
where he settled in New York as a agent for a cotton
factory. Looking to invest his surplus earnings and establish a new market for his sons to pursue, he traveled to Michigan in 1833 and arrived in Detroit where
the United States land-office was located. Hiring a
guide and an Indian pony each for the guide and himself. he left Detroit on the Shiawassee trail to look up a
satisfactory location. He wanted to find a locality
where the soil should be light enough to cultivate easily, and yet heavy enough to bear successive cropping, and still yield a remunerative return for the labor
of cultivation. Mr. How returned to Detroit in 1834 to
stake a claim in the southeast quarter of Section 6,
east three-fourths of Section 7 and west quarter of
Section 8 of Deerfield Township.
The following years saw more pioneers arriving in
Deerfield Township, including the Hatt, Nottingham,
Faussett, and Bennett families. William Bennett settled
on the west side of North Ore Creek at the foot of
Bennett Lake, which was appropriately named in his
honor.

Deerfield Centre was initially settled in 1842. It
commenced in 1842 when Calvin W. Leonard made
the first purchase of land on the school section, and
built the first house in the village... In 1879, the village
included one church, one school-house, one townhouse, one store and post-office, one blacksmithshop, about a dozen dwellings, and a population of
about 50.
By 1844, there were approximately 150 resident
taxpayers in the Township. 1860 witnessed a Township population of 1,015 and in 1863, the Township's
first township hall (town house) was constructed near
the identical site of the current Township Hall, for a
cost of $790 (including the lot, building, and furnishings).
The 1874 census revealed the existence of 184
farms in the Township, with an average farm size of
approximately 118 acres and an average yield of approximately 14.5 bushels of wheat per acre.
Industry was initially introduced to the Township
by John How in 1834 with the construction of a sawmill across the Shiawassee River. Other industrial activities which evolved in the Township during its early
years, and subsequently disappeared, included an
ashery, a distillery, and a grist mill.

When Livingston County was first organized in
1833, Howell Township included the land area now
known as Deerfield Township. In the winter of 193637, the inhabitants began to think that they were entitled to become a separate political division; and held a
meeting at the house of Charles D. Topping to consider the question. The meeting was held in the evening, and was attended by about a half-dozen persons. A petition was drawn up and signed preparatory
to its presentation to the Legislature, and several
names were proposed. The petition was duly forwarded, and the Legislature, ignoring all of the names
proposed, gave the town the name that it pleased
them to select. Hence, Deerfield Township.

1 Source: History of Livingston County, Michigan. With Illustrations and Biographical Sketches. Philadelphia: Everts &amp; Abbott. 1880.

B-1
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Appendix C
PHYSICAL PROFILE - NATURAL FEATURES
CLIMATE

southeast corner. Glacial deposit thickness increases
from west to east across the entire Township. There
are no outcroppings of bedrock. The proximity of the
~e?ro~k to the surface of the ground does not impose
hm1tat1ons for normal excavating or construction.

The effect of the Great Lakes on weather in Livingston County is not as noticeable as in other parts of
Michigan. As a result, the County receives 5 to 10
percent more sunshine than the western part of the
state. Precipitation averages 33.57 inches per year,
and 59 percent of the annual total is received during
the April-September period. Snowfall averages 42.6
inches per year. Cloudiness is most prevalent in the
fall and early winter months, and is least during the
late spring and summer. Average daily maximum temperatures range from 30 degrees in January to 82 degrees in July. Below in Table C-1 is temperature and
precipitation information for Livingston County.

The surface geology of Deerfield . Township resulted from glaciation 13,000 to 14,000 years ago.
When glacial retreat was uniform, rocks were deposited in an even fashion across the landscape. Gently
rolling till plains, which make up most of the Township,
was the general landform produced by that process.
Three more distinct landforms resulting from glaciers
are moraines, outwash channels, and kettles.
Moraines are hills which divide drainage basins, or
watershed areas. In addition to defining drainage patterns, moraines are highly porous and provide natural
intake points for water to percolate into the groundwater table. Examples of moraines in Deerfield Township
are in the southeast one quarter of the Township, in
the area bounded by White Road on the west, Hogan
Road on the North and continuing into the townships
south and east of Deerfield Township.

Table C-1 - Climatic Information
Temperature
Preci :&gt;itation
Month

Average

Average

Daily

Daily

Maximum

Minimum
c· Fl
16.6
16.0
23.6
34.8
45.6
56.0
60.1
59.1
51.6
41.7
30.0
20.0

,. F\

Januarv
30.3
Februarv
31.6 March
40.8
54.8
Aoril
Mav
67.2
77.3
June
Julv
82.1
Aucust
80.5
72.4
Seot.
October
60.7
44.4
November
December
32.8
• on davs with snow cover

Average
Monthly
Total
linches\
1.96
2.12
2.58
3.44
3.76
3.40
2.75
3.34
2.99
2.72
2.42
1.0

Average
Snow
Depth•
finches\
3.7
4.5
3.7
1.8
2.0
0
0
0
0
1.0
2.6
3.0

Outwash channels were once watercourses resulting from glacial meltwater and include areas of Deerfield Township such as Cranberry Creek and North
Ore.
Following glacial retreat, large blocks of ice occasionally broke from the glacier and became embedded
in the depositional debris. As those ice blocks melted,
depressions called kettles were formed. Kettles which
form small lakes are natural reservoirs for the containment of surface water. Because they are usually
shallow water bodies, they are easily susceptible to
water pollution caused by development adjacent to
their shores. There are many unnamed kettle depressions and small lakes in Deerfield Township.

Source: Livingston County Soil Survey, Soil Conservation S91Vfce

GEOLOGY
Deerfield Township is underlaiden by . two major
bedrock formations; Marshall Sandstone and Coldwater Shale. These are the first bedrock formations to be
encountered beneath glacial deposits. Except for the
extreme northeast areas of the Township which are
underlain by the Marshall Formation, the balance of
the Township is underlain by the Coldwater formation.
The thickness of glacial deposits overlaying the sandstone and shale bedrock ranges from approximately
100 feet along portions of the Township's western border to as much as 200 feet in the Township's far

TOPOGRAPHY
The relative steepness of an area has an impact
upon drainage patterns, private costs of development,
and public costs. There are numerous areas throughout Deerfield Township which exhibit slopes of 12 to
18 percent or more (see Map C-1 ). Many of these
steeper areas follow the water courses in the TownC-1

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�ship. These slopes place limitations on development.
Generally, slopes exceeding 7% present special construction problems and require special measures to
prevent soil erosion and surface water sedimentation.
Careless hillside development can also lead to increased costs for providing various public utilities and
services. Roads, sewers, and water lines require special engineering and construction in such areas.

The shores of lakes, especially in Livingston
County, are very popular for land development. Th~
attract new development more than any other natu 1 ~
feature and often have a very high market value. Con:
sequently, lakefront development is often built at a
high density. Faulty septic system siting (where sewer
is not available) and storm water runoff are major concerns because small and shallow lakes are susceptible
to pollution from runoff and migrating groundwater that
has been contaminated.

Preservation of the existing character of steep
sloped areas in Deerfield Township is especially important because of the erodibility of gravely soils in
those areas, and because of impacts on nearby watercourses (including Bennett, Shannon, Indian, and
Louis Lakes, Cranberry Creek, North Ore Creek, and
the Shiawassee River). Excavation and removal of
vegetation from steep-sloped areas for development
would significantly increase runoff and sedimentation
of local lakes and streams and would ultimately undermine the attractive and distinctive character of the
Township.

The cumulative effects of lakeshore development
have intensified state-wide since the 1950's. Lakeshore homes previously were used only for weekends
and vacations . After interstate highways were built, the
lakes became more accessible and lakeshore homes
became desirable as permanent homes. It should be
of no surprise then that most of the developable lakefront land in Deerfield Township has already been
build upon. Many of the Township's shoreline areas
are not desirable or feasible for development because
of the presence of wetlands. It should be noted however that the existence of developed lakefront land
does not necessarily preclude future new redevelopment projects of these areas and their potential to
place excessive recreational and environmental demands upon adjacent water resources.

The Township generally falls in elevation to the
north and west from the Township's southeast corner.
The absolute topographic relief in Deerfield Township
varies from a maximum elevation of approximately
1,013 feet above sea level at McGuire and Faussett
Roads in the southeast corner of the Township to a
minimum of approximately 835 feet along the shoreline
of the Shiawassee River in Section 6 of the Township.
Section 6 in Deerfield Township is the lowest elevation
in Livingston County.

Along with new lakefront homes and existing lak
front homes being converted to permanent residence~.
conveniences such as garbage disposals, clothes
washers, and detergents were introduced. In addition,
lawns were fertilized and mowed, and more roads and
driveways were built near the lakes, exposing bare
ground surfaces. Use of detergents, removal of vegetation from the landscape, use of fertilizers, and increased densities near lakes can ultimately result in
diminished lake water quality. Most inland lake water
quality problems are largely the result of inappropriate
land use practices.

INLAND LAKES
A list of the lakes of 10 acres or more in size in
Deerfield Township appears in Table C-2. The combined surface area of these 1o lakes covers approximately 741 acres. The lakes are scattered throughout
the Township, though the southern third of the Township is the most void of lakes (see Map C-2).

Dense lakefront development often results in contamination of groundwater from septic systems located
in high water table areas, which are commonly found
on the shores of lakes. This groundwater often
migrates into the surface water, resulting in an acceleration of aquatic weed and algae growth. Lakes that
have steep slopes adjacent to them usually have
problems with erosion and sedimentation on their
shores rather than problems associated with high
water table.

Table C-2 - Lakes 10 Acres or Larqer
Lake

Location

Bennett Lake
Indian Lake
Lake Shannon
Lobdell Lake
Ryan Lake
Loufa Lake
Unnamed
Unnamed
Hidden Lake
Unnamed

Sections 1 2
Sections 8 17
Section 24
Section 2
Sections 3 4
Sections 1o 15
Section 33
Section 34
Sections 18 19
Section 8

Approximate Area
(acres In Twp.)
181
155
117
70

85
85
34
22
19
13

Dredging and filling activities along most lakeshores are regulated by the Department of Natural
Resources through the Inland Lakes and Streams Af"'\"",
I
PA 346 of 1972, MCL 281 .952 et seq. The Coun.,
C-2

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Drain Commissioner, through the provisions of the Soil
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Act, PA 347 of
1972, MCL 282.101 et seq, has authority to review
land development and land uses regarding soil erosion
and sedimentation issues, and prescribe conditions to
minimize such conditions.

including tributaries, urban areas, and hills. Deerfield
Township is at or very near the beginning of the
Shiawassee River system, so it contributes floodwaters to downstream communities such as Owosso,
while it receives no floodwaters from other areas.

SOILS
DRAINAGE
The resource use or development capacity of a
specific parcel of land is largely dependent upon the
characteristics of the soils present on the site. This is
especially true of an area such as Deerfield Township
where public services are limited. The Township relies
upon groundwater and on-site wastewater treatment.
Sewers operated by Genesee County near Bennett
Lake service only a very small portion of the Township. Substantial areas of surface soils in Deerfield
Township suggest severe limitations for residential and
urban development. The Livingston County Soil
Survey identifies more than 80 soil units in the County,
the majority of which can be found in Deerfield Township (see Table C-3 listing of soil map units proceeding
Map C-4A).

Deerfield Township lies entirely within the major
drainage basin of the Shiawassee River. The Township itself fall within six smaller sub-watersheds. Watershed boundaries are shown in Map C-3 .
The primary watercourses in Deerfield Township
are the Yellow River Drain, Cranberry Creek, North
Ore Creek, and the south branch of the Shiawassee
River. Extensive wetlands are associated with portions
of these drainage courses including areas southeast of
Bennett Lake and areas surrounding Louis Lake and
to the north and south.
Natural drainage systems perform important
drainage and water storage functions that would otherwise have to be provided by costly public works
projects, and thus they should be preserved. Streams
and watersheds having flow characteristics that have
been adversely altered can also contribute to flooding
or flow problems downstream. Additionally, increased
runoff and sedimentation from adjacent development
can cause irregular flow and choke a watercourse's
connection with groundwater formations, adversely affecting groundwater resources.

Land Use And Soils
Each soil type has unique characteristics which pose
opportunities for some uses and limitations for others.
The most important characteristics making thesoil
suitable or unsuitable for development are limitations
on dwellings with basements, limitations on septic tank
absorption fields, and suitability for farming. The
degree of soil limitations reflects the hardship and expense of developing the land. Soil limitations can be
classified into three categories:

FLOODPLAINS

Slight: Relatively free of limitations or limitations
are easily overcome.

Areas adjacent to creeks, streams and rivers are
susceptible to periodic flooding that can cause extensive damage to buildings and can pose a substantial
threat to public health and safety. 100 year flood
boundaries have not been mapped by the National
Flood Insurance Program for Deerfield Township. The
floodprone areas in Deerfield Township, if any do in
fact exist, are relatively small because the Township
includes some of the higher elevations in the region
(and is actually near the top of the watershed), is not
traversed by any major watercourses, and has a rolling terrain which facilitates runoff drainage.
Communities which have the greatest danger of
flooding are those in the downstream areas of major
watersheds. As a river travels down its watershed
(toward its emptying point on the Great Lakes), it accumulates runoff water from many different sources,

Moderate: Limitations need to be considered, but
can be overcome with good management and
careful design.
Severe: Limitations are severe enough to make
use questionable.

A modern soil survey was completed for Livingston County by the USDA Soil Conservation Service in
1974. The soil types present in Deerfield Township are
shown on Maps C-4A and C-4B, and further clarified in
Table C-3. Soil types found in Deerfield Township are
essentially glacial deposits acted upon by soil formation processes such as wind and water. As a result of
glaciation, soil types vary widely from site to site in
Deerfield Township. This, coupled with the fact that
soil depths on USDA soil survey maps average 3-5
C-3

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�feet, make conclusive and accurate delineation of areas with severe limitations difficult. Site visits and inspections are necessary in nearly all instances to establish actual site conditions .

Limitations for Septic Systems
Substantial portions of Deerfield Township have
surficial soils that impose severe limitations on septic
tank absorption fields. These soils are concentrated in
large groups, as well as scattered, and comprise approximately one third of the Township's total land area.
Soils pose severe limitations for a variety of reasons,
including steep slopes, wetness, and slow or excessive permeability. Approximately two thirds of the
Township's surficial soils present moderate or moderate/severe limitations. Less than 80 acres of the
Township's surficial soils present only slight limitations.
Map C-5 shows the septic system limitation areas for
the Township.
The degree of soil limitations reflects the hardship
and expense of developing that land for a particular
use. Those soils classified as severe have varying degrees of development potential based on the nature of
the limitation. Soils with severe limitations for septic
systems can be broken down into the following categories:

fore, the limitations maps are meant to serve only as a
guide, and on-site inspection will be necessary in mo~
cases to establish site-specific information.
r
Municipal sewer systems are necessary when
residential densities exceed the inherent ability of soils
to prevent wastes from reaching water supplies . For
most soil types that means densities of more than one
and one-half dwellings per acre. With less dense development and soils without extreme limitations for
septic systems, sewage can be disposed of safely by
individual private systems.

Standards for Septic Systems
The Livingston County Health Department has established standards for septic systems. These standards apply somewhat different site characteristics
when determining the degree of limitations for septic
systems, compared to the Soil Conservation Service
approach , which focuses on soil types and slope.
Applications for a septic permit will be rejected by the
Livingston County Health Department if:
• The highest zone of groundwater saturation is
less than 2.5 feet below the original ground surface.
• The stabilized percolation rate is in excess of 45
minutes per inch of fall.
•

A. Sandy, moderate to rapid permeability.

',

• The proposed site is subject to flooding or is
within the ten year flood prone area.

B. Rapid permeability, wetness and high water
table.

• Where there exists less than 2.5 feet of naturally
occurring permeable soil that is considered as
suitable for the disposal of liquid sewage wastes
as determined by the Soil Conservation Service.

C. Wet, ponding, heavier (clay) soils, slow permeability.
D. Very wet soils, organics, wetlands, floodplains,
unable to support septic fields.

• Variances may be granted for existing structures
where sewage disposal system repairs, corrections, and/or alterations are necessary (in the
opinion of a Health Officer).

Soils in categories B, C and Dare not able to support septic fields because of extreme wetness. Soils in
category A are classified as severe by the Soil Conservation Service, but in most cases, sites with these
soils can be modified to make septic systems feasible,
depending on specific local conditions.

Where the upper soil profile is considered unsuitable for the installation of a sewage disposal system, a
"deep excavation· or "cutdown system" may be acceptable if:

Because of the diversity of soils found within most
areas in Deerfield Township, conditions on a particular
site may be completely different from what the soil
maps indicate. Even though the site may appear to
have severe limitations for development, there may be
areas where development is suitable because the limiting soils are underlain by suitable soils within 12 feet
of the ground surface. Such an occurrence would be
an important consideration in determining site suitability for an on-site sewage disposal system. There-

• Permeable soils encountered are within 12 feet
of the ground surface and are not confined to an
area less than 2400 square feet, except when
the site is otherwise unsuitable.
• Water-bearing formations found within the 12
foot range are not artesian.
• There is sufficient information to substantiate
that contamination of existing or future watwells will not occur.
'l. ,
C-4

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

·'

�• No less than 3 feet of permeable soils exist below the unsuitable soils.

ment measures such as irrigation and fertilizer. Some
soil~ are ..co~sidered prime farmland only if they are
drained. Umque farmlands" are based on certain soil
•~~es as w~II :3s other factors, such as landscape po~ltlon (prox1m1ty to water supply, orientation to sunlight, slope, etc.), moisture supply, and present management practices. "Prime farmland" soils are shown
on Map C-9. Prime farmland soils comprise approximately one. half of t~e area of Deerfield Township.
They are fairly consolidated and situated principally in
the southern two thirds of the Township , although
there are several areas in the Township's northern regions.

• The unsuitable soils above the permeable soils
are not saturated (muck, peat, marl, etc.).

Basement Limitations
Limitations for dwellings with basements are
shown on Map C-6. Some soils are rated by the Soil
Conservation Service as having severe limitations on
basements because of excessive wetness, low
strength , excessive slope, or shrink-swell potential.
Severe limitations are not concentrated in any particular areas, but are scattered throughout the Township.
Soils considered unsuitable for construction of dwellings with basements cover less than one quarter of the
total land area of the Township.

WOODLANDS
Table C-4 identifies the type and acreages of
woodlands in Deerfield Township. The wooded areas
of Deerfield Township are predominantly hardwoods
with only very small areas of conifers. There are sev~
eral particularly large (in excess of 600 acres) contiguous tracts of woodlands in the Township, including
around the Indian Lake area and along the Shiawassee River corridor. Woodlands, which cover approximately one quarter of the Township's land area, are
shown in Map C-10.

Most Suitable Soils
for Development
The most suitable soils for development, with respect to both septic system and basement limitations,
are depicted in Map C-7. Those soils considered most
suitable for development, based upon the limitations
they present for both on-site sewage disposal and
building construction, are generally situated in the
southeastern half of the Township although do include
considerable areas along the northern areas of the
Township. There are only a few locations in the Township where the most suitable soils for development extend over large contiguous areas.

Table C-4 - Woodland Use/Cover Codes
in Deerfield Townshio

Hydric Soils
Hydric soils present another limitation to development. They are very poorly drained, saturate easily
and retain large quantities of water. They are generally
unsuitable for structures. The Soil Conservation
Service defines hydric soils as :

Code

Descrlctlon

Area lnTwc.

412
414
421

Uoland Hardwood
Lowland Hardwood
Pine

3 912 acres
1 684 acres

183 acres

The importance attached to woodlands is a function of their demonstrated ability to stabilize slopes, retard erosion, conserve water quality and quantity,
maintain local micro-climates, filter the atmosphere,
decrease noise levels and provide wildlife habitats.
Mature trees represent a valuable resource in maintaining the aesthetic character of Deerfield Township.
Future development should not occur at the expense
of existing tree cover. Wooded areas in Deerfield
Township should be managed to insure their long term
existence and to help preserve the rural character of
the Township.

"A soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long
enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part."

If artificially drained, hydric soils can be suitable
for farmland use. Map C-8 shows where these hydric
soils are. Most of the hydric soils in the Township are
found near watercourses and correspond to present or
former wetlands. Residential, commercial and industrial development in areas containing hydric soils
should be strongly discouraged.

WETLANDS
Wetlands include marshes, swamps, and the areas between dry land and open water. These are areas typified by poor drainage and standing water.
They are important community resources for several

Prime Farmland
"Prime farmland" soil types have been identified
by the Soil Conservation Service as those best suited
tor food production: they require minimal soil enhanceC-5

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�reasons. Wetlands provide a filter to keep inorganic
materials out of the water supply, act as a sponge to
retain water during dry periods and hold water during
floods. One acre of marsh is capable of absorbing
300,000 gallons of water. Wetlands provide this hold•
ing capacity inexpensively. If destroyed they can be
replaced only with expensive structural public improvements. Wetlands also function as critical wildlife
habitats.
A significant portion of Deerfield Township can be
characterized as wetland. These wetland areas are
primarily associated with the river channels and lakes
located within the Township . Some of the wetlands
exist in relatively large, contiguous areas, including
those associated with Louis Lake and Bennett
Lake/North Ore Creek. There is a large wetland area
which is not contiguous to water courses or lakes, located north of Center Road between Argentine and
Green Roads, covering approximately 300 acres. The
majority of the balance of the wetlands are found in
smaller areas of 40 acres or less. Some wetlands,
such as fens or meadows, do not look very wet and
may not be wet a large part of the year. Most of these
areas are seasonally flooded-usually in the spring
and fall, and in the summer they are often without
standing water, although the organic soil usually stays
near saturation.
Because wetlands are a valuable natural resource,
they are protected by the Wetlands Protection Act, PA
203 of 1979, MCL 281.701 et seq. PA 203 requires
that permits be acquired from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) prior to altering or
filling a regulated wetland. The Wetland Protection Act
defines wetlands as:
"land characterized by the presence of water
at a frequency and duration sufficient to support and that under normal circumstances
does support wetland vegetation or aquatic life
and is commonly referred to as a bog, swamp,
or marsh and is contiguous to the Great
Lakes, an inland lake or pond, or a river or
stream."

inches in diameter, and maintenance or operation of
electric transmission and distribution power lines. " '
Per~its will not b~ issued if a feasible or prudent
alternative to developing a wetland exists. A map of
wetlands based on the DNR's land use/cover inventory
is illustrated on Map C-11 . Table C-5 shows the land
use/cover codes pertaining to regulated wetlands in
the area. Some areas of hydric soils not shown as
wetlands would likely be classified as wetlands if they
were not artificially drained.
Table C-5 - Wetland Use/Cover Codes
Code
414
423
611
612
621
622

Descrlctlon
Lowland Hardwood
Lowland Conifer
Forested Wetland
Shrub Wetland
Aauatlc Bed
Emeraent Wetlands

Area In Two.
1,684 acres
O acres
247 acres
760 acres
0 acres
291 acres

GROUNDWATER
Wells within Deerfield Township supply all of the
water for residential, commercial and industrial uses in
the Township. Most of these wells draw from the confined glacial drift aquifer, which is separated from thJi..
ground surface by a ·confining" layer of clay or roc111!!!'~""
Some wells draw from the unconfined aquifer, which is
more vulnerable to contamination from the ground surface. Generally, drawing water from the Coldwater
Shale bedrock provides water of much lower quality
than that obtained from the Marshall Sandstone bedrock.
Groundwater is an unseen resource and is therefore particularly vulnerable to mismanagement and
contamination. Prior to the 1980's, little was known
about groundwater contamination in Michigan, and
some important facts have recently been revealed.
The leading causes of groundwater contamination
in Michigan are from small businesses and agriculture.
More than 50% of all contamination comes from small
businesses that use organic solvents, such as benzene, toluene and xylene, and heavy metals, such as
lead, chromium, and zinc. The origin of the problem
stems from careless storage and handling of hazardous substances. On paved surfaces where hazardous
materials are stored, substances can seep through or
flow off the edge of the pavement. Materials can also
get into floor drains which may discharge to soils,
wetlands or watercourses .

Regulated wetlands include all wetland areas
greater than 5 acres or those of any size contiguous to
waterways. Wetlands which are hydrologically connected (i.e., via groundwater) to waterways are also
regulated. Activities exempted from the provisions of
the Act include farming, grazing of animals, farm or
stock ponds, lumbering, maintenance of existing nonconforming structures, maintenance or improvement of
existing roads and streets within existing rights-of-way,
maintenance or operation of pipelines less than six
C-6

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�problem area. The sources of contamination are not
known. Faulty septic systems do not always filter
wastes adequately before they reach unprotected
groundwater supplies (i.e. there is an inadequate impervious surface between the ground surface and the
groundwater}. Leaching fertilizer from farm fields could
also be a source.

Many common materials used by homeowners are
highly toxic and can also contaminate groundwater
supplies, even when used in small quantities.
Groundwater protection is everyone's responsibility,
and prevention of contamination is the most effective
way to protect groundwater supplies.
Map·c-12 illustrates those areas in the Township
that may be more vulnerable to groundwater contamination due to a combination of simultaneous conditions including high permeable soils and the comparatively limited depth to the water table.

Act 307
The Michigan Environmental Response Act, PA
307 of 1982, MCL 691. 1201 et seq, provides for the
identification, risk assessment, and priority evaluation
of environmental contamination sites throughout the
State. Following evaluation via a risk assessment
model developed by experts from various state
agencies, contaminated sites may be placed on one of
two lists. The sites are given priority based on such
factors as the availability of federal Superfund money,
Act 307 funding, voluntary action by responsible parties, the likelihood of successful legal action, and the
need to address immediate public health concerns.
One list consists of sites where further evaluation and
interim response activities are required. The other list
contains sites where response activities are ready to
be undertaken. There are no sites in Deerfield Township currently suspected of soil or groundwater contamination nor included on the current fiscal year Act
307 lists.

ENVIRONMENTALLY IMPACTED SITES

Water Supplies with
High Nitrate Concentrations
Approximately eight sites with elevated nitrate
levels (above Sppm) in· groundwater are scattered
throughout Deerfield Township, including sites near
Wiggins and Faussett Roads, Latson and Center
Roads, Argentine and Hogan Roads, and Green and
Allen Roads. Though the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considers nitrate levels of 10ppm as the
maximum limit of generally acceptable levels, it Is
generally recognized that once levels exceed Sppm,
they are apt to continue to increase and indicate a

C-7
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�MAP C-1 STEEP SLOPES
Explanation and Key Points:
Areas in black are very steep hillsides (over 18% slope) which pose substantial limitations to safe
development and typically shoukf not be built upon or exposed because of extremely high erosion
potential and high public service costs. Steeply sloped areas are found throughout the Township.
The checked-pattern areas are hillsides with moderate slope (12-18%). These areas also pose
severe limitations to buikfings, septic systems, and public services. To the extent that
development is permitted on such slopes, it shoukf occur only when adequate measures are
taken to protect the hillsides from erosion and minimize other negative effects of such
development. The lightly shaded areas are 6-12% slopes, which pose moderate limitations for
development. All areas of 6% or greater in slope comprise less than a fifth of Deerfield
Township's total land area.
Methodology:
The Soil Survey of Livingston County contains a table, listing each soil type in the County and its
slope. Using a computerized mapping system and a digital USDA soil survey map of Deerfield
Township, soil map units defined by the respective slope ranges were automatically located and
filled with the appropriate patterns and printed.
Source:
UOSA Soil Survey of Livingston County, Michigan
Digital UDSA Soil Survey map of Deerfield Township

�W~~W[?11]~[1W 1I@W~0C=ODlP
Livingston County, Michigan

Map C-1

•
II

6-12% Slopes
12-18% Slopes

STEEP SLOPES

•

Slopes 18% and Greater

N

A
SCALE

1:56,950

1 nch • 4746 feet

I

�CBC§~ru[?[J~[Q) lJ~~lJ:ODCP
Uvingston County, Michigan
(

~r • • • • - • •• •••••

······-t••l··············•,·r··
V

\
6

5

11

9 •

•
~

+

+

14

12

+
13

+
I

27

28

Map C-2

I/I

LAKES and DRAINS

Drainage ditches or
natural streams

l_......•··1

TIie drains
SCA1.E 1:56,950
1 heh • &amp;746 feet

�MAP C-3 WATERSHEDS
Explanation and Key Points:
A watershed is an area which drains into a particular river, lake, or stream. Thus the Cranberry
Creek watershed is that area where all rainfalls ultimately flows into the Cranberry Creek. The
boundaries between different watersheds are called divides, and typically fall on ridges or high points. Map C-3 shows that most of Deerfield Township drains into the Cranberry Creek and
Yellow River Drain. Deerfield Township is basically at the headwaters, or at ihe top. • of its
drainage basins, and as a result does not experience the effects of flooding and water pollution
that communities located further downstream do. This Is because floodwaters and pollution
accumulate as more and more communities contnbute their runoff to the river, stream, or lake in
the watershed.
Methodology:
Planning consultants met with personnel from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources
(MDNR}. The Lakes and Streams Unit, Land and Water Management Division, maintains a file of
watershed areas in the state. Following a brief discussion of the watersheds in the Township, the
information was transferred to a computerized mapping system and a pattern-filled map was
generated.
Source:
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Land and Water Management Division, Lakes and
Streams Unit

�[g)~~ffiC?LJ~[10 V@W~~CXJDCP
Livingston County, Michigan

5

0.

0

. -~ 1

&lt;)

8

~""

~

+

----·-----=
·----·-

\

+
---~-·
--- -

-

~

+

+\)

\

28

River Drain
G'

~

+
.

34

~J~,,.~
0

0

Map C-3

WATERSHEDS

N

I/

J

A

Watershed boundary

SCALE
Nov&amp;m~. 1992

,
1

1:56,950

1 r.ct, • 4746 teer

1..0,-,."'"'Q .

MICNQOri

�Table C-3

SOIL MAP UNITS
Ad
ApA
ApB
ApC
Ba
Be
Bp

BrA
BrB
BrC
BsA
BsB
BtA
BtB
BtC
BtD
BtE
BtF
BuA
Bv

BwA
By
Cc
Cr

CvA
CvB

CxA

~

Ed
FoA
FoB
Foe
FrB
FrC
FrD
FrE
FrF
Gd
Gr
HdB
HdC
HIS
HIC

Alluvial land
Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Arkport fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Arkport fine sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent
slopes
Barry sandy loam
Serville loam
Borrow pits
· Boyer loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Boyer loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Boyer loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Boyer loamy sand, silty substratum, Oto 2
percent slopes
Boyer loamy sand, silty substratum, 2 to 6
percent slopes
Boyer-Oshtemo loamy sands, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
Boyer-Oshtemo loamy sands, 2 to 6 percent
slopes
Boyer-Oshtemo loamy sands, 6 to 12 percent
slopes
Boyer-Oshtemo loamy sands, 12 to 18 percent slopes
Boyer-Oshtemo loamy sands, 18 to 25 percent slopes _
Boyer-Oshtemo loamy sands, 25 to 35 percent slopes
Brady loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Breckenridge loamy sand
Bronson loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Brookston loam
Carlisle muck
Colwood fine sandy loam
Conover loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Conover loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Conover-Miami loams, O to 2 percent slopes
Edwards muck
Fox sandy loam, o to 2 percent slopes
Fox sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Fox sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Fox-Boyer complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Fox-Boyer complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Fox-Boyer complex. 12 to 18 percent slopes
Fox-Boyer complex. 18 to 25 percent slopes
Fox-Boyer complex, 25 to 40 percent slopes
Gilford sandy loam
Gravel pits
Hillsdale loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Hillsdale loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Hillsdale sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Hillsdale sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes

HID
HIE
HmB
HmC
Ho
La
Le
Lm
LoB

Md
MIB
MnA
MnB

MnC
MoA
MoB
Moc

MoD
MoE
MoF

MrB
MwB
OaB

OkB
OIA
018

OmA
OmB
Orne
OmD
Pc
Rf
Se

SvB
SvC
SvD
SvE
SvF
Tm
We

WeA
Wn

Hillsdale sandy loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes
Hillsdale sandy loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes
Hillsdale-Miami loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Hillsdale-Miami loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Houghton muck
Lake beaches
Lamson fine sandy loam
Linwood muck
Locke sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Made land
Metamora sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Metea loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Metea loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Metea loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Miami loam, Oto 2 percent slopes
Miami loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Miami loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Miami loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes
Miami loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes
Miami loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes
Miami-Conover loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Minoa-Thetford complex, Oto 4 percent slopes
Oakville fine sand, Oto 6 percent slopes
Oakville fine sand, loamy substratum, 0 to 6
percent slopes
Ottokee loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Ottokee loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Owosso-Miami sandy loams, 0 to 2 percent.
slopes
Owosso-Miami sandy loams, 2 to 6 percent
slopes
Owosso-Miami sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent
slopes
Owosso-Miami sandy loams, 12 to 18 percent
slopes
Pewamo clay loam
Rifle muck
Sebewa loam
Spinks-Oakville loamy sands, 0 to 6 percent
slopes
Spinks-Oakville loamy sands, 6 to 12 percent
slopes
Spinks-Oakville loamy sands, 12 to 18 percent
slopes
Spinks-Oakville loamy sands, 18 to 25 percent
slopes
SpinksOakville loamy sands, 25 to 35 percent
slopes
Tawas muck
Warners loam
Wasepi sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Washtenaw silt loam

�(

Map C-48
SOIL TYPES - NORTH HALF

�(

Map C-4A
SOIL TYPES - SOUTH HALF

~

et

�MAP C-5 LIMITATIONS FOR SEPTIC SYSTEMS
Explanation and Key Points:
The map graphically represents surficial soil limitations for residential septic systems. Limitations
from slight to severe are shown, with severe limitations having the darkest pattern and slight
iimitations having the lightest. Lakes are shown in black. Areas with moderate/severe to severe
limitations for septic systems comprise approximately one half of the Township's land area.
These areas are considered to have severe limitations because of high water table, excessive
slope, wetness, very high permeability, or very slow permeability. As a result, large portions of
Deerfield Township are unsuitable for development on parcels substantially smaller than two
acres, without public sewer systems. Areas shown as having moderate or slight limitations are
suitable for development at somewhat higher densities without public sewer systems.

Methodology:
The UDSA Soil Survey of Livingston County contains a table, listing each soil type in the County
and its limitations for septic tank absorption fields. The soil survey table was not used directly
because local health department policies for issuing septic system permits vary considerably
within Michigan. Specifically, the Livingston County Health Department considers some soils
rated by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) as having moderate limitations to actually have
severe limitations. In other cases, soils rated as severe by SCS can have only moderate
limitations. Because of the need for a more detailed analysis of septic system limitations, soils
were divided into the following six categories:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Sandy, moderate to rapid permeability (moderate)
Sandy, rapid permeability, high water table (severe)
Wet, ponding, heavier (clay) soils, slow permeability (severe)
Very wet soils, organics, floodplains (severe)
Moderate -limitations
Slight limitations

Personnel at the Livingston County Health Department were consulted regarcfang the valicfrty of the
soils within the six classifications. Some of the soils were changed from one classification to another
because the experience of the Health Department with those types of soil in Deerfield Townsh.,. In
some cases, certain loams and sandy loams were considered by Health Department staff to have
severe limitations rather than moderate. It was also noted by Health Department staff that the soil
survey map units only cover a profile of no more than six feet below the surface, and soil types below
that level vary widely in Deerfield Townsh., because of glaciation. Sometimes, sites with severe sol
limitations within the upper six feet are under1ain by •good• soils for septic systems. However this is not
often the case, since the areas rated as severe on Map C-6 have a high water table, are found in
wetlarxJs or swamps, or have steep slopes. WetlarxJs and areas with a high water table are very
unlikely to be underlain with suitable soils.
Using a computerized mapping system and a digital USDA soil survey map of Deerfield
Township, soil map units defined as having slight, moderate, and severe limitations for septic
systems, with respect to the above six classifications, were automatically located and filled with
the appropriate patterns and printed.

Source:
UDSA Soil Survey of Livingston County, Michigan
Digital UDSA Soil Survey map of Deerfield Township
Livingston County Health Department
kg/ stallon5:\ wotd\deeflcomplanldsepli,,...doc

12·2•a:J

�I
Livingston County, Michigan

Map C - 5

•

Lill.]

LIMITATIONS FOR SEPTIC SYSTEMS
Moderate/Severe

Slight

Moderate

II

Severe

•

N

\Veter

A
SCALE

1:56,950

1 ncn " 4746 feet

�I

MAP C-6 LIMITATIONS FOR BASEMENTS
Explanation and Key Points:
Map C-6 graphically represents surflcial soil limitations for basements. Limitations from slight to
severe are shown, with severe limitations having the darkest pattern and slight limitations having
the lightest pattern. Lakes are shown in black. Areas with severe limitations for dwellings with
basements comprise approximately one fifth of the Township's land area. These areas are
considered to have severe limitations because of high water table, excessive slope, wetness,
shrink-swell potential, and the tendency of the soils to cave In. Soils with severe limitations for
dwellings with basements are found primarily in areas of hydric soils, steep slopes, and wetlands.
Thus, these soils could be considered unsuitable for development.

Methodology:
The Soil Survey of Livingston County contains a table listing each soil type in the County and its
limitations for dwellings with basements. Using a computerized mapping system and a digital
USDA soil survey map of Deerfield Township, soil map units defined as having slight, moderate,
and severe limitations for basements were automatically located and filled with the appropriate
patterns and pril")ted.
Source:
UDSA Soil Survey of Livingston County, Michigan
Digital UDSA Soil Survey map of Deerfield Township

�r
Livingston County, Michigan

Map C - 6

•
•

Slight

Moderate

LIMITATIONS FOR BASEMENTS
~ Severe

•

Wa t er

· SCALE

1:56,950

I rC"\ " 4746 feet

�r

MAP C-7 MOST SUITABLE SOILS
Explanation and Key Points:
Shaded areas on Map C-7 represent surflcial soil areas most suitable for residential development
with respect to limitations for basements and limitations for septic systems. The areas
represented are places where limitations for both septic systems and dwellings with basements
are considered moderate or slight. These •suitable• soils comprise approximately one quarter of
the Township's total land area and are found mostly in the southeastern half of the Township.

Methodology:
Using a computerized mapping system and a digital USDA soil survey map ot Deerfield
Township, soil map units defined previously as having moderate or slight limitations for both
septic systems and dwellings with basements were automatically located and filled with the
appropriate patterns and printed.
Source:
UDSA Soil Survey of Livingston County, Michigan
Digital UDSA Soil Survey map of Deerfield Township
Livingston County Health Department

'9'alallon6.'\~1111lllnld!Nuil.doo
12-2-83

.~

\

�I

DEERFIELD
Li Vin g S::. 0 n

TOWNSHIP

CO Un t y.

,\, ' :!. C h :!. ~

2

~

i.~- ~

~va
}111,

~ -'-)- ~ ~

1,~,

~

15

I

~---.~;::::.._;: \
---·-....·-·. .-·- - .......
.....
..-·- ··-·-··-··· ... ·..,-..... ...·-····-·
··-

-•--•••---•...-M•--·-··- .......
-·--•-··•-····
--···
·--.... ·--··....
o - •-

• •• • --

?IMIIU"I I 10111r,q ".lnter [re

,..,

........ ..... . .... ,.,

__ . , .. ... • ..... . .... ..... , ,

MOST SUITABLE

•

SOILS

Map C - 7
N

A

11'1 --- ✓ E
'5 ot l , "4o5 t Su :1:.ao t ~ • -:r- '.; e ·,~ '..:: 11e" ·.

-

-· -·· .... --· .. ......... _

.

··- ·

-

s
:c . ... :!
~ - ...

·:

-

:21\•0
••• ,

'J '"I t

�MAP C-8 HYDRIC SOILS
Explanation and Kay Points:
Shaded regions on Map C-8 represent areas covered by hydric soils. Hydric soils are generally
very wet, or have been wet for extended periods in the past, organic soils which, in their natural
state, are poorly drained, saturate easily, and retain large quantities of water. In Deerfield
Township, these soils are found mostly near watercourses and wetlands. Hydric soils always
have severe limitations for both basements and septic systems. They are generally unsuitable for
any type of structural use. Areas with hydric soils are often a home for wildlife and may have a
variety of recreational uses. If properly drained, they can be suitable for farming.
Methodology:
The USDA Soil Conservation Service publishes a list of all hydric soils in Michigan. Hydric soils in
Deerfield Township were identified from that list and input into the digital soil map of the
Township. Using a computerized mapping system and the digital USDA soil survey map of
Deerfield Township, soil map units designated as hydric soils were automatically located and
filled with the appropriate patterns and printed.
Source:
UDSA Soil Survey of Livingston County, Michigan
Digital UDSA Soil Survey map of Deerfield Township
USDA Soil Conservation Service Michigan hydric soils list

••

�I

W8@@[?[]~[1W

Lf@W~0[X]DCP

Livingston County, Michigan

Map C - 8 . HYDRIC SOILS

•

~ Hydrlc Soils

•

Water
SCAU:

1:56,950

1 ndl • ,04/J fee t

�I

MAP C-9 PRIME FARMLAND SOILS
Explanation and Key Points:
Shaded areas on Map C-9 represent two types of prime farmland soils. The darker of the two
patterns is prime farmland soils in their current state, while the lighter pattern represents areas
that are considered prime farmland only if drained. Areas not requiring drainage comprise the
vast majority of all prime farmland soils. Prime farmland soils cover a significant portion of
Deerfield Township; almost one half of the total land area.
Methodology:
The UDSA Soil Survey of Livingston County contains a table, listing each soil type in the County
and its ranking as prime farmland . Using a computerized mapping system and a digital USDA
soil survey map of Deerfield Township, soil map units defined as being prime farmland were
automatically located and filled with the appropriate patterns and printed.
Source:
UDSA Soil Survey of Livingston County, Michigan
Digital UDSA Soil Survey map of Deerfield Township

loigletallon6.'\~arm.doo

12·2-83

•

�Livingston County, Michigan

Map C-9

PRIME FARMLAND SOILS

Ill

Prime Farmland

II

Prime Farmland, If Drained
j

SCAl.£

1:56,950

: 1 rd1 "' 4746 fee t
I
~

4l lor,t,,Q

C,.,.,tet.

ire .

�MAP C-10 WOODLANDS
Explanation and Key Points:
The shaded regions on Map C-1 O represent four different types of wooded areas. The three
_general types of woodland cover are hardwoods (broadleaf trees), conifers (needle-leaf trees),
and wooded swamps. Most of the woodlands in Deerfield Township are hardwoods, some of
which exist in very large contiguous areas. Conifers are found in several small patches scattered
throughout the Township, as are small wooded swamps. The largest wooded areas tend to be
located on hilltops and near watercourses and wetlands.
Methodology:
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources maintains the Michigan Resource Inventory
Program, which contains land cover/use information for the entire state. The land use/cover
information is based on interpretations of color infrared aerial imagery taken in 1978. The land
use/cover inventory for Livingston County was revised in 1986 by the MDNR based on updated
imagery. Subsequent minor revisions were made by the consultant based on aerial photographs
of the Township taken in the spring of 1990 by SEMCOG.
Each polygon area on the land uselcover inventory map has a unit label. This label is a three or
four digit number which corresponds to the State's land use/cover classification system. To
generate the map, a digital map was •downloaded• into a computerized mapping system from the
MDNR's computer. All map units with woodland numbers were automatically located, filled with
patterns, and printed.
·

Source:
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Michigan Resource Inventory Program
1990 SEMCOG aerial photographs

�CB~~@C?D8l1CB lf@W~C=ODCP
Livingston County, Michigan

~

214

22

(1

MapC-10

WOODLANDS

~ Upland Hardwood

II Upland Conifer

~ Lowland Hardwood

•

Wooded swamp

SCALE
~1992

1

ncn •

1:56,950
4746 feet

�MAP C-11 WETLANDS
Explanation and Key Points:
The shaded regions on Map C-11 represent wetlands. There are a variety of wetland types found
io Deerfield Township, including surface waters, swamps, and lowland woodlands. All of the
areas shown on Map C-11 are wetlands, based on vegetative cover. It is likely that they are
protected by the Wetlands Protection Act of 1979, provided they are larger than five acres in size
or are contiguous to an inland lake or stream. Most of the wetlands in the Township are greater
than five acres in size and are found near watercourses. The largest areas of contiguous
wetlands are found near Bennett Lake and Louis Lake, and in Section 14.
Methodology:
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources maintains the Michigan Resource Inventory
Program, which contains land use/cover information for the entire state. The land use/cover
information is based on interpretations of color infrared aerial imagery taken in 1978. The land
cover/use inventory for Livingston County was revised in 1986 by the MDNR based on updated
imagery. Subsequent minor revisions were made by Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. based on
aerial photographs of the Township taken in the spring of 1990 by SEMCOG.
Each polygon area on the land/use cover inventory map has a unit label. This label is a three or
four digit number which corresponds to the State's land use/cover classification system. To
generate the map, a digital map was •downloaded" into a computerized mapping system from the
MDNR's computer. All map units with wetland numbers were automatically located, filled with
patterns, and printed.

Source:
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Michigan Resource Inventory Program
1990 SEMCOG aerial photographs

kg/stallon5~worftd~.doc
12·2·93

•

�[I)~~@C5LJ@[1[1)

U@W~[X]OCP

Livingston County, Michigan

~·
,~

)t5

Map C -11

WETIANDS

~ Lowland Woodlands

~ Shrub swamp

W~11rn Wooded swamp

Ill Emergent

•

Water

N

.A
SCALE

1:56,950

1 rct, • 4746 tee r
1..0,...lr"O• Mk:r"'tQOf'"'I

�Livingston County, Michigan

···+········ ·~ · · · ~

Map C - 12

GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY

Soils wtth moderately

high permeability
Soils wtth high

permeablltty

IIill

Areas most susceptible to contamination,
with a combination of highly permeable
soils and a high stattc water level of the
unconfined glacial drttt aquifer.
Static water level of the unconfined
glacial drtft aqutfer (feet below ground surface)
November. 1992

""°"r"W'IO i1i

l.0,....,,...0 C.-n1-,. inc .

N

A
SCALE 1:56, 950
1 nct'l • 4746 feet

�Appendix D
PHYSICAL PROFILE-LAND USE/COVER,
PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES
LAND COVER/USE

The relative amount of urbanization in a community {i.e., number of acres devoted to urban uses) can
be deceptive in that a relatively small amount of acreage devoted to a use can still have significant impacts
on the character of an area {e.g., strip commercial
development or an abandoned gravel pit that was not
properly reclaimed after operations ceased). Placement, design and timing of development can greatly
affect visual quality, accessibility, cost of service delivery, as well as perceived, and real quality of life.

Deerfield Township has a typical Congressional
Survey township configuration of approximately 36
square sections (square miles). In fact, the Township
is 37.6 square miles (24,076.3 acres), the majority of
which retains a rural character. Approximate acreages
of general land cover/use categories for the Township
are as follows:
• 41.3% in agriculture (9,940 acres), consisting
predominantly of cropland, and the majority of
the balance consisting of confined feedlots and
pasture.

Concentrated residential development in Deerfield
Township is centered around the Township's largest
lakes. More than 250 dwelling units are situated in the
immediate areas of Bennett Lake and Lobdell Lake,
the majority of which are situated in platted subdivisions including the Clairmont Farms Subdivision, Lake
Farms Subdivision, and Katrine Hills Subdivision. The
Lake Shannon area includes more than 150 dwelling
units of which the majority are part of the Lake Shannon Subdivision. The vast majority of the lots associated with these lake-based neighborhoods are between 1/4 and 3/4 acres in size. The majority of residential development in the Township, by area, is of a
strip development pattern, consisting largely of approximately five to ten acre lots fronting on the County
road network.

• 24.0% in forest cover {5,775 acres), including
upland and lowland hardwoods and upland and
lowland conifers.

(

• 20.9% in open shrub or herbaceous areas
{5,035 acres).
• 5.1% in wetlands (1,230 acres), including forested, shrub, and emergent wetlands.
• 5.0% in residential uses (1,195 acres).
• 3.7% in surface water (883 acres).
Commercial and industrial development accounts
for less than 1O acres, as is also the case with mineral
extraction.

There is one single mobile home park in Deerfield
Township, developed in the last several years and located on the south side of Bennett Lake Road. The
park has direct access to Bennett Lake and is able to
accommodate up to approximately 90 units, approximately half of which are in place.

A detailed inventory of land cover and use can be
found in Maps D-1A and D-1 B. Map D-2 provides an
overview of land cover/use in Deerfield Township. Inventory maps of natural features such as slopes,
woodlands, wetlands, prime farmland, soils and other
soil limitations can be found in Appendix C.

There are very few commercial facilities in the
Township. A bar and restaurant are situated on the
north side of Bennett Lake and Argentine Road includes a soft water sales and service operation near
Center Road, and a convenience store at Faussett
Road. There are a number of nurseries, car and body
shops, and dog kennels scattered throughout the
Township. Two private recreational vehicle campgrounds operate in the Township. Each includes approximately 30 sites and are situated on Indian Lake
and Louis Lake.

Approximately 41% of the Township is in agricultural use. Farmlands are evident throughout the
Township but are most prominent along the Argentine
Road Corridor. Lands enrolled in the Farmland and
Open Space Preservation Program (PA 116 of 1974)
are depicted on Map 0-3. The PA 116 program provides property tax relief to landowners in exchange for
limitations on the use of farmland for nonfarm
{especially development purposes) .

0-1
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�It should be noted that, though not zoned for
commercial use, there are many activities of a commercial nature occurring throughout the Township on
agriculturally and residentially zoned lots for which the
respective property owners have received permission
through the approval of special use permits. These
uses have, over the years, become an increasing
source of conflict due to their negative impacts upon
surrounding residential uses.

Township, and in large numbers, as more and mar,..-....
40, 80, and larger acreage parcels were subsequently,
divided. For example, less than 1O separate parcels
comprised Section 19 of the Township in 1961 , and
this number increased to more than 30 (excluding platted parcels) by 1980. This growing pattern continued
through the 1990's and today, more than a third of the
Township is comprised of parcels 5-1 O acres in size.
Figure D-1 on the following page illustrates this evolution as it has occurred in Sections 19, 20, 29, and 30.

A vast recreational facility exists within Deerfield
Township: the Oak Grove State Game Area. This
facility covers thousands of acres along the western
portions of the Township and is discussed in more detail under "Public Facilities" in this Chapter. Though
not nearly as expansive, the Huron Valley Girl Scouts
own more than 300 acres along Louis Lake which they
use for recreational camp facilities.

The impact of land divisions into 5-10 acre lots is
to squeeze out agriculture, which requires large areas
of land to maintain economic viability. Such lot split
patterns also facilitate congestion and traffic hazards
along area roadways, raises costs of providing public
services such as sewer and water, and fosters an urban landscape in place of previously expansive rural
vistas.

Map D-4 presents land according to its tax classification. The majority of land in the Township is taxed
as agricultural. In 1991, Deerfield Township had a total
State Equalized Value (SEV) of $55,287,197 (this figure includes real and personal property), 77.0% of
which was attributable to residential development and
15.1% was attributable to agriculture. Industrial and
commercial development accounted for 0.4% and
0.8% of the Township's total SEV, respectively. 6.4%
of the Township's total 1991 SEV was attributed to
personal property.

TRANSPORTATION
The Michigan Department of Transportation classifies roads in Michigan communities for the purposes
of state funding. Deerfield Township includes no interstate or state trunkline roads, and only 19.2 miles ~
County primary roads. Except for 1.2 miles of subdivision roads, the balance of the Township's 49.0 roadway miles are classified as County secondary (see
Map D-5). County primary roads include:

LAND DIVISION

• Argentine Road, along its entire length.
• Faussett Road, along its entire length.

In 1930, large tracts of land primarily devoted to
agricultural use prevailed in Deerfield Township. The
vast majority of parcels were of 80 acres or more in
size and only a few lots of 1o acres or less in size existed. In 1961, the lot split pattern evident in the Township was largely similar to that of previous years except the number of lots of 10-15 acres in size had increased slightly. The initial subdivisions along Bennett
Lake were in place at this time as was the Oak Grove
State Game Area. The following ten years saw a continued but slow increase in lot splits of five and ten
acres, and more subdivisions along Bennett Lake were
in place and Lake Shannon witnessed the development of its first subdivision. However, but nine years
later in 1980, it was apparent that the Township was
witnessing a major shift in its lot split pattern. Ten acre
parcels were beginning to appear in all parts of the

• Bennett Lake Road, along its entire length.
• Cohoctah Road, from Killin to Argentine Roads.
Few of the County roads in the Township are
paved. Argentine Road is the only corridor which is
paved throughout its entire length within the Township.
Except for only portions of the other County primary
roads and the far southern mile of Latson Road, all
other road segments in the Township are gravel.
The Livingston County Road Commission has performed 24-hour traffic counts along most of the principal corridors in the Township. The most recent figures
available are listed in Table D-1 .

'
D-2
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Figure D-1
EXAMPLE OF LOT SPLIT EVOLUTION

1930

•

Souta1: Rockford Plat Maps.

0-3
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Table 0-1
24 HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Location and Year
Arqentine Rd. , north of Center Rd. (1990)
Arqentine Rd ., south of Center Rd. (1990)
Aroentine Rd. north of Cohoctah Rd. (1991)
Arqentine Rd. south of Cohoctah Rd. (1991)
Aroentine Rd., south of Fausset! Rd . (1990)
Bennett Lake Rd ., north of Abbey Rd. (1984)
Bennett Lake Rd .. north of Abbey Rd.(1988)
Bennett Lake Rd .. east of Arqentine Rd. (1984)
Bennett Lake Rd . east of Araentine Rd. (1988)
Bennett Lake Rd .. east of Clairmont Rd. (1982)
Bennett Lake Rd. west Clairmont Rd. (1988)
Bennett Lake Rd .. east of Crosby Rd. (1982)
Bennett Lake Rd., west of Crosby Rd. (1982)
Center Rd., west of Aroentine Rd. (1990)
Clairmont Rd. north of Bennett Lake Rd. (1982)
Cohoctah Rd., west of Aroentine Rd. (1988)
Cohoctah Rd., west of Arqentine Rd. (1991)
Cohoctah Rd., east of Wiaains Rd. (1991)
Crosbv Rd ., north of Bennett Lake Rd. (1982)
Faussett Rd. east of Araentine Rd. (1990)
Green Rd., north of Faussett Rd. (1990)
Green Rd. north of Latson Rd. (1990)
Lutz Rd. north of Cohoctah Rd. (1983)
Wiaains Rd., south of Cohoctah Rd. (1986)
Wiaains Rd., south of Dean Rd. Rd. (1986)
Wiaains Rd., north of Faussett Rd. (1986)
Wiaains Rd. north of Faussett Rd. (1990)
Wiaains Rd. south of Jones Rd. (1986)
Wiaains Rd. south of Knaoo Rd. (1986)

Bennett Lake Road and Argentine Road are the
most heavily traveled roads in the Township. The traffic volume capacity of adequately paved roads is generally 5,000 vehicles per day. Gravel roads are generally considered sufficient to handle 300 vehicles or
less per day, by Livingston County Road Commission
standards. Except for certain sections of Wiggins
Road, the traffic counts do not identify particularly deficient road segments in the Township regarding capacity. It should be noted, however, that the Livingston
County Road Commission takes traffic count measurements in only a comparatively limited number of locations throughout the Township, and most of the
Township's gravel road segments are not monitored
comprehensively, if at all.

Vehicle Count
(24 hour)
1,890
2,195

2,247
2,232
3 ,176
938
1,359
898
1,343
1,175
1,374
1,781

1,309
818
905

265
352
271
354
464
100
87
26
83

382
387
643
222
127

County road rights-of-way are 120 feet for primary
roads and 100 feet for secondary roads. Platted subdivisions along County roads must provide for a 120
foot right-of-way. Roads within platted subdivisions
must have a minimum right-of-way of 66 feet. Where
the Livingston County Road Commission purchase~
land for new roadways, a 100-foot wide area is purchased.
Argentine Road provides the only direct continuous north-south route across the entire Township.
EasVwest routes are equally irregular, with Faussett
Road in the southern portion of the Township providing
the most direct east-west route across the Township. ,.-._

'
D-4

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Transportation access and patterns and frequency
of use greatly impact land uses in a community. In
fact, they often drive land use decisions.

fire stations located in Deerfield Township, the closest
being located in Argentine Township approximately
one road mile from Deerfield Township's north central
boundary. The Fenton fire station is located in the City
of Fenton, approximately six road miles from the
northeast corner of the Township . The Hartland fire
station is located near the Hartland Township Hall approximately four road miles from the southeast corner
of the Township.

There are approximately 10 private roads in Deerfield Township today, concentrated primarily in the
southwe~tern quarter of the Township. The number of
private roads can be expected to increase in the future
as residential development increases. Private roads
that are not properly marked or constructed can cause
serious problems in emergency situations. If a drive is
too narrow or not properly maintained or marked, then
emergency vehicles (ambulance, fire trucks) may not
be able to find and/or properly access properties in
need of assistance. School bus service can also be
greatly affected by private road development.

The Insurance Services Organization (ISO) evaluates communities with regard to fire protection and insurance agencies then use these evaluations, or ratings, to establish fire insurance protection rates.
Communities are ranked from 1 (the best) to 1 o (the
worst) according to ISO standards. A rating of "1 O" is
applied to a Township which does not have its own fire
department, although portions of such a township may
be ranked at "9" where there exists a fire station within
five road miles. Based upon these standards, it is
probable that the majority of Deerfield Township would
receive an ISO rating of 10, except for certain portions
of the Township's northern and central areas which
are within five road miles of Argentine Township's fire
station.

At the time of this writing, no major road improvements were scheduled within the Township aside from
routine maintenance.

DRAINAGE

I

'

•

The County drainage system in Deerfield Township is composed of six primary drainage systems,
operated and maintained by the Livingston County
Drain Commissioner (see Map Appendix C, Map C-2).
Each of these systems is composed of one or more
smaller drains which interconnect with one another.
Two systems in particular drain the vast majority of the
Township. The Yellow River Drain begins in Section
33 and travels north to Indian Lake and then on across
the Township's northern boundary east of Latson
Road. The Livingston No. 3 Drain begins at the far
southeast corner of the Township and travels in a
northwest direction to Louis Lake and Root Lake
where it empties into Cranberry Creek which, in tum,
empties into the Yellow River Drain one half mile south
of the Township's northern boundary. Only a small
fraction of the drainage systems in the Township consist of tile drain segments.

Police protection is provided by the Livingston
County Sheriff Department and the Michigan State
Police. The Livingston County Sheriff is located in
Howell, although there is a satellite post in Hartland
Township at M-59 and US-23. The nearest state police
post is located in Brighton.

SCHOOLS
Deerfield Township is served by three public
school districts; Howell, Linden and Hartland (see Map
D-6). The Hartland School District serves most of the
Township residents. There are no school facilities located in the Township. Appendix E provides additional
information on the area school districts.

POLICE &amp; FIRE

PUBLIC FACILITIES

Deerfield Township receives fire protection from
three different municipalities; the City of Howell, Argentine Township, and Hartland Township. The entire
north half of Deerfield Township (north of Center and
Spaulding Roads) is served by the Argentine Township fire department. The southwestern half (west of
Argentine Road) is served by the City of Howell fire
department and the balance of the Township is served
by Hartland Township fire department. There are no

Public facilities in Deerfield Township are limited
(see Map D-7). The Deerfield Township Hall, constructed in 1863, is located on Center Road in Deerfield Center, just west of Mack Road. The Livingston
County Road Commission owns a parcel of land in the
interior portion of Section 36 near Payne Lake where it
maintains a sand and gravel extraction operation. The
three cemeteries in the Township are privately owned.

D-5
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Certainly the largest of the public facilities in the
Township is that of the Oak Grove State Game Area.
All state game areas were established, and are maintained, for the purposes of preserving wildlife habitats
and providing opportunities for hunting and other passive recreation activities. Though the current official
boundaries of the Oak Grove State Game Area include more than 4,000 acres in Deerfield and Cohoctah Townships, only a small portion of this acreage is
in actual public ownership. Approximately 1,400 acres
of the approximately 2,700 acres included in the
boundary of the State Game Area in Deerfield Township is in public ownership. The Oak Grove State
Game Area includes some of the largest contiguous
expanses of woodlands and wetlands in the Township.

f

t

The state is currently reviewing all of the plans for
its many state game areas in an attempt to update
preferred boundary lines and management strategies.
Though these planning efforts are in their infancy, it is
a general intent of the state's future planning strategies to focus on acquiring in-holdings within the respective game areas rather than pursuing less compact boundaries and acquisitions. The Oak Grove
State Game Area has been a very successful game
area for the state and it is the intention of the DNR to
maintain the game area well into the future.

SEWER AND WATER
None of Deerfield Township is served by public
water systems, and only a very small area of the
Township is served by public sewer. Six residential
subdivisions near the intersection of Abbey and Bennett lake Roads, comprising approximately 300 lots,
receive public sewer service through an extension of
the Argentine Township public sewer system. Current
contractual agreements provide Deerfield Township
with approximately 530 residential units of sewer capacity, of which approximately half have already been
committed. Comparatively speaking, the excess capacity of approximately 260 residential units should be
considered limited since this amount of capacity can
be quickly used up by one or several large development projects and/or new nonresidential uses.
Township residents rely on private wells for water.
This should be a critical consideration in planning efforts. High density development or residential development near commercial or industrial land uses can
lead to contamination of wells.
The locations of private wells are illustrated in Map
D-8.
D-6
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�Table D-2
STATE EQUALIZED VALUE 1982-1991

Aqriculture
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Developmental

1982
7,070,300
464,730
128,700
26,245,446

1984
7,602,350
467,580
128,700
25,609,153

1986
1991
7,521 ,333 8,337,512
539,380
462,310
128,700
214,585
26,132,390 42,547,950
161 ,350

Figure D-2
STATE EQUALIZED VALUE 1982-1991

I\

45,000,000

~ Agriculture
40,000,000

1111 Residential
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000

0
1982

1986

1984
Source: M,cn,gan State Tma$umr

/

0-7
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1991

�Figure 0-3
ALLOCATIONS OF LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES 1991

County Taxes
Township Taxes

---'·
School Taxes

D-8
DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�MAPS D-1a, D-1b, and Map D-2 LAND COVER/USE
Explanation and Key Points:
_The land cover/use maps show land use according to the Michigan Resource Inventory Program,
managed by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). Maps D-1a and D-1b are
the actual lines and land use classification numbers prepared by the MDNR. Map D-2 is a
graphical representation of the data in Maps D-1a and D-1b. Detailed land use classifications
have been generalized for Map D-2 into categories of agricultural, commercial, residential, etc.
Methodology:
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources maintains the Michigan Resource Inventory
Program, which contains land cover/use information for the entire state. The land cover/use
information is based on interpretations of color infrared aerial imagery taken in 1978. The land
cover/use inventory for Livingston County was revised in 1986 by the MDNR based on updated
imagery. Subsequent minor revisions were made by the consultant based on aerial photographs
of the Township taken in the spring of 1990 by SEMCOG.
Each polygon area on the land/use cover inventory map has a unit label. This label is a three or
four digit number which corresponds to the State's land use/cover classification system. To
generate the map, a digital map was •oownloaded• into a computerized mapping system from the
MDNR's computer. All map units were automatically located, filled with patterns, and printed.
Source:
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Michigan Resource Inventory Program

kg\alallonS.'\~\dlacov.doo
12-2-83

�\

Map D-1A
LAND COVER/USE - NORTH HAL
LOVEJOY RO.

412

21

21

.j1
H

r
r
z
H

JJ

0

r.

:r
N

JJ

0

21

13 1

4

~

~
~

,-..

J
31

21

--32

/1

1133

�Map D -18
LAND COVER/USE - SOUTH HALF

Q
0

0

z
z

m
rr-

::0
~

'
32
21

.

B

w

G')

Jl

m
m

z

· 412

31

21

Jl
0

3:

n

G)

21

C
H

Jl

rn

u

.,,
CIJ

~1
Jl

,,-...

31

JJ
0

21

21
32

Jl

0

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007599">
                <text>Deerfield-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan_1994</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007600">
                <text>Deerfield Township Planning Commission</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007601">
                <text>Township Board of Trustees, Deerfield Township, Livingston County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007602">
                <text>1994-07-21</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007603">
                <text>Deerfield Township Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007604">
                <text>The Deerfield Township Comprehensive Plan was prepared by the Deerfield Township Planning Commission and Township Board of Trustees with assistance from the Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. and Landplan, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007605">
                <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007606">
                <text>Landplan, Inc. (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007607">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007608">
                <text>Deerfield Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007609">
                <text>Livingston County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007610">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007612">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007613">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007614">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007615">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038280">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="48922" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="53748">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/2669d63c5e8e5d2d131d3df48d49e3c8.mp4</src>
        <authentication>bea018231dc0d35c6e0cc2bcef632a30</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="53773">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ad4d81a552a4135311001bfcebad6b16.pdf</src>
        <authentication>83758bd1981f98a7037d3cadc948d104</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="920251">
                    <text>DeGroot, Loren

Grand Valley State University
Veterans History Project Interview
Name of War: Cold War
Interviewee’s Name: Loren DeGroot
Length of Interview: (1:12:17)
Interviewed by: James Smither
Transcribed by: Maluhia Buhlman
Interviewer: “We’re talking today with Loren DeGroot of Grand Rapids, Michigan and
the interviewer in James Smither of the Grand Valley State University Veterans History
Project. Okay Loren start us off with some background on yourself and to begin with,
where and when were you born?”
I was born here in Grand Rapids, at least that’s what the post office was, but at the time my
parents lived about halfway between Grand Rapids and Rockford, and that was out in the
country. My father built the house in 1928 as a wedding present for my mother, I was born in
1935 and we lived out in the country. Our nearest neighbor was about a mile away and so we
were out there as a– I’m talking about our whole family.
Interviewer: “Right, now were you farming or doing something else?” (1:00)

No, the plot of land where we lived had been plotted out as a development for homes, but 1928 is
historically the prelude to the major–
Interviewer: “The Depression.”

Depression, and my father was a– In the furniture industry and he did a lot of the sawing and that
sort of thing. He worked in Sparta so it was a bit of a drive from where we were to there and we
lived there– My family lived there until after the war in 1945. At that time my parents, and my
mother especially and her sisters, got together and decided that it was time that someone take
care of grandparents who had grown to the point where they needed support. So my parents and

�DeGroot, Loren

grandparents got together and purchased a house in southeast Grand Rapids on Paris Avenue,
and so during my high school years we lived in that place in southeast Grand Rapids.
Interviewer: “Okay, and then did you go to public schools or Christian schools?”

I went to Grand Rapids Central, was there until I graduated from there in 1953 and then that was
the beginning of a change in my history, if you will.
Interviewer: “Okay, now did you have any connection to the military before you graduated
from high school?”

Personally, no connection but during the war I had many cousins who were in the war, had a
couple fatalities and several– More than two, I don’t know how many anymore, who were
wounded. During that time I became aware of the responsibility individuals had in defending the
freedoms that we enjoy. I was not active in the military at all except for the time beginning when
I was in high school and enlisted in the naval reserve.
Interviewer: “Alright, now why did you do that?” (4:05)

I think there were two factors that influenced me at that point in time, one was that my brother
had just been drafted into the Korean War, the other was that coming out of the time in the
Second World War I had a conviction that it was my responsibility to be available and do what I
could for my country
Interviewer: “Now did you think about it at all in terms of the prospect of actually going
into the service on active duty or were you just going to be in the reserves at that point?”

At that time I was– I remember vividly that my conviction was if our nation went into war it was
my responsibility to do what I could. Therefore my training in the naval reserve was part of what
I would expect to do if we went into active duty and had to defend our nation.

�DeGroot, Loren

Interviewer: “Okay but when you’re doing this you’re not looking at it with an eye towards
a career or anything like that?”

No.
Interviewer: “Okay alright while you were still in high school then you joined the reserves.
What did the reserves activity consist of?”

Weekly meetings at the reserves center, down on Monroe Avenue near the river, and then annual
times of active duty which lasted two weeks I believe, and for that we would go to different
places for that time. I remember one time I went to a small ship based in Chicago and there was a
patrol ship and we went to float it around. Drove around Lake Michigan, they had fire control off
on one of the islands up in the north part of Lake Michigan.
Interviewer: “Now why did you choose the Navy rather than another branch?” (6:35)
I really don’t know, I had one cousin who was in the Navy, he was in submarines, but I have
always had a– I’ve always had an interest in the Navy, in ships as I recall– Remember that I
enlisted when I was in high school and prior to that I can recall reading many stories as a
youngster of naval work and I just enjoyed what I read.
Interviewer: “Okay, alright now so you’ve gone into the reserves but not really– So you
could be available to serve your country should the country need you but in the meantime
what kind of future did you see for yourself going out of high school? What’d your family
think people would do?”
That changed, I think that at the beginning I really had no future objectives. I just hadn’t
developed those in high school because when I was in high school, as I said earlier, there was
nobody in my family that had any education beyond high school and so it was at that time it was
that I would follow the rest of my family into physical work, and then comes along that time of
the school awards and now I need to start thinking something totally different, and at that time

�DeGroot, Loren

then I began thinking “Well what is there?” And that led me to think that there is a possibility
that I could go into engineering. That happened in my first or my second year at Grand Rapids
Junior College I believe.
Interviewer: “Now let’s back up a little bit because you explained to me off camera the
story about the award ceremony at school but we didn’t record that. So can you tell what
happens when you have your award ceremony near your graduation from high school?”

Prior to the time of the awards assembly, which was the last meeting of the school prior to the
graduation, prior to that I had no intention of looking beyond high school. At the awards
assembly some friends of mine from the football team and I were sitting all together as would be
normal, and we were down in the front of the auditorium and all of the awards went through as
normal. For many schools' recognitions of advancements that have been held in that awards
assembly I was given several awards that I really didn’t know what they were for. One of them I
recall was the highest scoring mathematics student for the advanced mathematics that we were
having. Out of all of that I began to think that because of the John Ball scholarship, which was
the first athletic scholarship given to Grand Rapids Junior College and I received the first one of
those. (11:00) So there’s something historically interesting in all of that as my life has
progressed.
Interviewer: “Okay, so you got now a scholarship so you could go to the junior college.
Alright and then did you play football then at the college?”

I did, I played football for Grand Rapids Central High School but I was not a– I was not a hero.
At the time– Or in my class I should say, Terry Barr is a name that is well remembered, he went
to the University of Michigan then, then he went to the Detroit Lions, he was a great leader. I
was not that kind, I did not expect to be– That when I got my scholarship, went to Grand Rapids
Junior College and that was a new adventure. Grand Rapids Junior College was not what Grand
Rapids [Community] College is today, I remember that we would start with maybe 50 people–
50 individuals for the team but because we played schools such as Western Michigan University,
it was State College then, but we didn’t play the first team we played the second team and that’s

�DeGroot, Loren

kind of rough and by the end of the year things got kind of tough indeed because many of the
people that started, quit. I had the scholarship and I continued and there were I think the last
game that we had in both my first in second years, we had 13 to 14 people that were left. We had
one time in our last game we had one fella that had his arm in a sling, another one that was on
crutches but the coach says he’s gotta have people on the bench so they suited up and there they
were, but we didn’t have any place else to go.
Interviewer: “Alright, now did you continue with your reserve training at this point?”

Yes, I– Throughout my time at junior college we had weekly training classes, a day a week I
think it was, which were down at the naval reserve center and then we finished that. During that
time we also had the active duty for training which was a two week cruise or some other place
that we would go.
Interviewer: “Okay, now at one point did you become interested in becoming an officer or
how did that happen?”

In high school my football coach was Chuck Irwin, tremendous guy he coached me in the game
of football, he found out in fact I think that he was a motivator and getting me the scholarship
that I did and then I found out– Well I knew beforehand but he was a World War II veteran and
he was an officer in the Naval Reserves. He may have influenced me in accepting the officer
training thing in fact I’m certain he was. (15:40) Had a tremendous influence in my life, he led
me in becoming an officer or wanting to become an officer I should say, and so when I had the
opportunity to– From my enlisted status, to move into something that was called reserve officer
training which was a special section of the naval reserve at that time, I gladly took that and that
then led me because I knew nothing about an officer’s position and what the responsibilities
were but it led me to understand that if I was going to serve my country and if I was going to be
in a leadership position I needed to do certain things like the officer training and he influenced
me on accepting that assignment to naval reserve officer training. That then led me to a
commissioning after I had graduated from college, from University of Michigan, and that led me
then to my three year service on a destroyer, operating out of the 2nd Fleet off the coast of– The

�DeGroot, Loren

eastern coast of the United States, operating in eastern Mediterranean during one of the wars they
had over there and then also operating in the Caribbean in the recovery of satellite material
which was just beginning. So we were operating on some exciting historical things.
Interviewer: “Well let’s back up a little bit into the training period. So you’re two years at
the Grand Rapids Junior College, you then go on to Michigan to complete a bachelor’s
degree and– But when you’re in Michigan were you doing reserve officer training or you’re
doing ROTC of some kind there and that was part of what you were describing?”

And when I went to the University of Michigan for my second two years I did not– I was not
attending active duty there. I had gotten married in my junior year and my wife and I moved to
Michigan for my senior year. Now at Michigan, at the time, an engineering bachelor’s degree
was typically a five year course, I could only do it– If I couldn’t do it in four years I couldn’t do
it because we didn’t have enough money and so it was a challenge but I finished it and I had
good marks and one of the people that locally influenced me through that was Dr. Gordon Van
Wylen [Note: Dr. Van Wylen’s interview is in our archive] who had graduated from Hope
College and was my first thermodynamics professor and so I had influences from many places
leading me in God’s path to a certain career.
Interviewer: “Okay, so did you go to Newport, Rhode Island after graduating from
Michigan? Was that your–” (19:43)

Yes from Michigan– After graduating from Michigan I went to my final reserve commitment
which was as an enlisted person, and following that went to officer training in Newport, Rhode
Island, got commissioned there.
Interviewer: “Now what did the officer training program consist of?”

Everything. We had classes in gunnery including torpedoes and that sort of thing, and that led me
to be assigned to the gunnery department when I was assigned to this destroyer in the Atlantic
fleet. In addition other classes, other studies included navigation and because of my interest in

�DeGroot, Loren

mathematics in college I enjoyed the navigation very much because of the complex requirements
of satellites, only at that time there were no satellites there were stars– But using stars to find
your position. So it was– Those were the two major things and they stick out to me because
when I was assigned to the destroyer I had some conditioning in those two areas. That led me to
the mathematics of navigation and it led me to the understanding of the engineering parts of the
mechanics of things.
Interviewer: “Okay, now when was it that you actually went to the destroyer, I mean do
you remember what year it was?”

That would be 1957.
Interviewer: “Okay, that sounds right. Okay so when you join the crew of the destroyer
what kind of reception do you get or what happens when you get there?”

For me it was a very interesting time because here I am boot ensign coming on board the
destroyer and on the destroyer there are several officers who had spent four years at the Naval
Academy. I will forever remember the first time we had our pay, we would– The process was
that all the officers would join in the wardroom and we would be called out alphabetically and
we would receive our pay. (23:15) At that time the pay consisted of either what you had declared
you wanted the money to go to, such as my wife, but also we were paid in $2 bills some of which
I still have but the interesting part that happened on my first pay day was the supply officer, who
was also the financial officer, was looking at his books and came to my name and he stops
talking and then he looks at me and he says “What on Earth?” Well what that was all about was
at that time I had six years of active duty because I was in the naval reserves, all of that applied.
At that point the officers who had gone to the Naval Academy started having a target that they
could have fun with because here I am boot ensign and I’m making more than what a lieutenant
who had been on the ship for a couple years had made. So you can have fun sometimes as long
as you keep your head down and watch out for the flying things.

�DeGroot, Loren

Interviewer: “Okay, now aside from that kind of interesting issue with pay, I mean was this
a good group of officers to work with or did you like some and not others?”

I had no major problems with any of the officers, we were a pretty good team. There were times
at which we had disagreements, I guess that might be normal, but we were all given our
assignments. Mine was in the gunnery department and then there were those in the supply and
those in the electronics and all that sort of thing but our duties were well defined as to what our
responsibilities were and they were accepted. I think it’s important to note that at that point we
were all at the same level. Our ship did not have any, what are called Miss Mustangs, who are
enlisted people who get commissioned and go on a ship. We had none of that, we were all young
inexperienced– Sometimes, when I say inexperienced, some were there for two or three or four
years but none of the big long term people.
Interviewer: “Okay, now did you have some petty officers or senior NCOs on the ship who
were lifers or guys who’d been there a long time?”

Oh absolutely. I think that on the ship when we deployed we had– Our enlisted crew consisted of
300 plus sailors, all the way from seaman apprentice to chief petty officer and as an officer it
was– As a commissioned officer it was necessary to understand that the senior petty officers are
the ones with the experience and they are the ones that carry out the duties. (27:18) It’s the job of
the commissioned officer to understand what that is and then to make sure that their assignments
are carried out to make sure that the equipment, in my case the guns, the torpedo tubes, the fire
control systems were having reliable maintenance, training, and all the rest of it but the
responsibility for doing that was the chief petty officer. They had what it takes and part of the
chief’s duties really was and is to train the junior officers. That’s an important responsibility
because if the officers are trained properly they will end up in their next command of training
others and so the teamwork comes there and I think that comes back to an analogy of training on
an athletic team, you become a team doing things together.
Interviewer: “Now in talking to the other veterans, especially people out of the Army and
the Marine Corps, they sometimes talk about officers come in out of an academy and they

�DeGroot, Loren

think they know everything and tell other people what to do. Did you see any of that or
were your guys well behaved?”
I think it would be impossible not to have some episodes of that type. I think because of my
background, coming from an uneducated Dutch family as a second generation, I came to the ship
knowing that I didn’t know anything and that I better learn. Not to say that there weren’t times
when I didn’t have a heavy learning experience, understanding what my duties were and not
going over them, but making sure they were done and there’s an interesting training period in
that and that comes sometimes from the more senior officers, like our executive officer, and
other times from our chief petty officer and sometimes not because he was enforcing something
but because I knew that a 1st class petty officer knew what he was doing and I could learn from
him. So I don’t mean to criticize them but I think that by not having any pre-training– Was a
milestone in my life that I didn’t come to a situation on the ship where I had the opportunity, if
you will, to try to tell this 20 year old veteran that here’s what you got to do.
Interviewer: “Alright, do you remember any sort of lessons you had to learn the hard way
or problems you ran into early on?”

Yes, one time I will never forget we came in from an operation in a snow and sleet storm, we
docked alongside– In Newport, Rhode Island which was the home port and the– Our executive
officer came to me after he had walked the deck and he found some fault. (31:53) That there
were some areas that had not been cleaned up very well, there was one which was a hatch that
had a bronze sticker on it and he told me that he wanted me to get the gunnery section out to do
their duty. Well I had a problem with that personally and the way I resolved that was to go into
the gunnery department, get a bucket including some brass cleaner, and go out and doing it
myself. Well, the exec found out about it and we had a brief discussion that lasted about a week
or so but I– Yeah you learn the hard way sometimes.
Interviewer: “Alright, did you just think it wasn’t fair to make your men do this or the job
didn’t really need doing?”

�DeGroot, Loren

My feeling was that making the brass shiny in the middle of a sleet storm was not something that
was– That was needed, period.
Interviewer: “Okay, alright now your home port is Newport so on your first cruise where
do you go?”

We went over to the Mediterranean, eastern Mediterranean, at the time there was a civil war in
Lebanon. It was really a civil war between the Mennonite Christians and the–
Interviewer: “The Maronite Christians, I think.”

The Maronite Christians and the– One of the two branches of Islam.
Interviewer: “The Sunni Muslims and the Shia.”

Sunni, and they were battling there. President Eisenhower at the time, this is now 1958, President
Eisenhower decided to send over a full fleet to stand by in case the civil war got out of hand and
now I don’t pretend to understand the politics behind all of that, but we were brought over there.
We had I believe two carriers, couple cruisers, and two squadrons of destroyers, a squadron at
the time being eight ships. The job of the destroyer was to have recovery if there was an accident
of an airplane landing on the carrier or taking off from the carrier, we need to rescue of that. So
our ship control was keeping us maybe 500 yards behind the carrier when things were going on.
Interviewer: “Alright, now when you were on the cruise did you go into port anywhere or
just stay at sea?” (35:30)

It took us I think a week to get over there then it was six weeks before we had our first short–
Going to the shore. So we had quite a bit of time on the ship and a lot of that was training
because this was the first time our ship, and I think most of the other ships in the squadron, had
been on active duty prior to going on sea duty. We had been at the shipyard in Boston and so as a

�DeGroot, Loren

whole crew, officers and enlisted, we were a new group and so there was a lot of training that
was needed in order to come up wartime standards.
Interviewer: “Okay, and so when you did get to go ashore in the Mediterranean, where did
you go?”

The island of Rhodes, which is an island of Greece. At that time my first shore duty was as a
shore patrol officer and that was a rather interesting experience. I had a wonderful chief
boatswain’s mate that came with me and I was under his control really, you don’t tell a chief
boat what to do but he told me and I learned a lot about young sailors, and I think the same for
any of the services. The first time you go ashore after you’ve been at sea for six or eight weeks,
whatever it was, things change completely. Being the, just at the scene– At the time I was an
ensign but yet I was the senior shore patrol officer and at that time we went into Rhodes, I think
there were two of the carriers that were there plus a squadron of destroyers and so forth, so there
were a lot of people and if memory serves me correct it was something like 5000 sailors were on
this small island. The chief told me what was going to happen when it started time for the boats
to start taking the men out to the ships and I didn’t believe him until I saw some of the cases
coming back from being on shore and having the experience of the first time after six to eight
weeks of sea duty, first time of finding what they had been missing. Now you’re wondering what
they were missing.
Interviewer: “Well there are two logical guesses: Alcohol and women.” (39:05)
Yeah there’s the women and there’s the beer and seeming more and more serious. So there were
a lot of people that then came back drunk and trying to control them is a challenge but for me is,
as a junior officer, it led me to understand a lot about human nature and responsibilities of those
that are senior to them and how they can be controlled and I don’t– By control I don’t mean
dictatorial kind of thing I mean togetherness and you went too far with that last drink you had
and now you’re going to do this. It was a good education period for me.

�DeGroot, Loren

Interviewer: “Alright, now did you stay in the Mediterranean then for an extended cruise
or did you go back to base?”

We were in the Mediterranean for, I think six months, yes six months because as we were in the
Mediterranean after we had been at Rhodes we went into Piraeus, Greece which is the seaport for
Athens and it was an interesting and unforgettable time for me because my wife was eight week
pregnant when I left Newport to go on this cruise and that’s why I was expecting a call. Now
four o’clock in the morning that we were entering Piraeus the duty radio men came down, and
they had been looking out for me, he came down and I was– Had just gotten to sleep and he
touched me on the shoulder and told me that I was a father. We were there then for a total of six
months as I think I mentioned, then we came back and we stayed in Newport, Rhode Island and
operated with a 2nd fleet along the east coast doing anti-submarine warfare and gunfire control
and that sort of thing.
Interviewer: “Okay, now were there Soviet subs out there to look for or was this mostly
just practice?”

Yes, there was– We needed to become efficient in the anti-submarine warfare event. Now at the
time, not when we were in the Mediterranean, but we came back and– I’ll get to your question in
a moment but there’s a specific that comes to it. After we came back from the Mediterranean our
home base was switched from Newport, Rhode Island to Mayport, Florida which at the time was
just getting started and our action being in Mayport was often with the anti-submarine warfare
organization down in Key West, and at that time I had been assigned special responsibilities as
ship’s navigator and I had been doing that for several months by that time. (43:35) We were
going from Mayport down to Key West and in getting there we didn’t go way out into the ocean
but we took the closer in and one morning after I had the command and control responsibilities
in the– On the bridge we got a special radio call telling us to make contact with another
destroyer. That other destroyer was closer to Key West, we were about 50 miles away as I recall
it, he had made contact with something but couldn’t identify it but he knew that it was– He
thought that it was a submarine. All of the intelligence was checked out, all of the intelligence
agencies were checked out and it was determined that there was no American submarine in the

�DeGroot, Loren

area. So we were told to go down there and join up with this other destroyer, and protect him and
verify if we could that it was a destroyer, but what happened was that it turned out it was a
destroyer–
Interviewer: “Or a submarine?”
Submarine, I’m sorry submarine, and we came up and we validated with the other destroyer
where this person was. So we were pinging him from two directions on our sonars, nothing could
be done and we found out later that he had run aground on one of the–
Interviewer: “Shoals or reefs or?”
Yeah one of the reefs that were there, and he couldn’t move, they did make contact after some
time– With him and validated that it was a submarine but he wasn’t going to give up anything
and neither was the U.S Navy. So we had a little bit of fun and that lasted for about two weeks I
think. Finally he did give up under certain conditions and that is that he could come up to on the
surface, could not do anything except open all of his upward hatches so they wouldn’t be able to
dive again and we had– We were at battle stations the whole time that we were there. So it was
an exciting time, I have to say that it was a serious time because it could have been a wartime
situation. I was blessed in my Navy career that I was never needed to go into an active combat
situation but we did need to be ready to perform in a combat situation. This was one of them and
in it because I was a navigator I was on the bridge most of the time. (47:45) I didn’t stand– Just
stand watches I was there the whole time and I learned a lot. In that because of the serious nature
of it we had– I’m sorry.
Interviewer: “You said you learned a lot from experience.”

We learned a lot, let it go at that.

�DeGroot, Loren

Interviewer: “Okay, and then you I think also mentioned before that while you were kind
of in the Caribbean in that area you were also involved with, I guess picking up satellite
debris or other things like that.”

We were– At the beginning when we were still in Rhode Island we would come down and there
would be some satellite launches and because of the newness– Now this is the late 50s that we’re
talking about, because we were, as a nation, we’re trying to get into the missile and satellite
assets. There were a lot of accidents that were happening by accidents being that a satellite goes
up but it comes down before it’s supposed to or at the other end a satellite is coming back with
some payload on it and I remember the chimp or the monkey that came down and needed to be
recovered. There was that kind of thing so we got a broad experience and for me personally that
expanded my thinking about engineering, about a career, about the science, about satellites and
all of that. It was an incredible learning period for me and I think that it’s necessary in our
understanding of military operations, we need to understand that there is the probability, I go
beyond possibility, there is the probability that this nation will be in wartime again and we need
to be ready for it or we will not be. So in getting ready for it we need to train in realistic
environments, that becomes difficult but yet we need to buckle up and come to attention on it or
times come when we would never survive it.
Interviewer: “Serious business.”

Yes it is.
Interviewer: “Alright, now how long then did you actually stay on the ship was that till ‘60
or ‘61?” (51:15)
‘60 I think it was in— Well it was three years, I was three years on it.
Interviewer: “Yeah so ‘57 to ‘60, yeah.”

Yeah and I served the full time of my active duty on the ship.

�DeGroot, Loren

Interviewer: “Right, now while you were in the Caribbean and that’s around the point
when things are getting pretty interesting in Cuba. You haven’t gotten to the missile crisis
yet and Castro hasn’t fully taken over but it’s starting to happen then. Did you ever have
any missions that in any way related to what was going on there or you just follow your
normal routine?”

Castro in 1958 was just beginning to achieve the things that he had been working on for a long
time. He had at that time established his army, if you will, at the Gitmo area that is Guantanamo
Bay, and we were at Gitmo which is still a major training center for the U.S Navy, that’s where
we did our pre-deployment training. We came to understand that we were in a very delicate place
at that time, we were there later, the Bay of Pigs happened. Yes, we got involved in some of the
difficulties that were going on.
Interviewer: “Okay, alright are there other particular memories that you’ve got from the
active duty time on the ship that kind of stand out for you that you haven’t brought into
the story yet?”
I’m not sure if I have said this but one of the absolutely major things that happened to me was
when we were over in the Mediterranean and our commanding officer called me when I was on
the bridge one afternoon, said he wanted to see me in his sea cabin when I got off watch. So I did
and he told me that he’d been looking at my papers and found that I had a good record as a
navigator or doing navigation things and that my time in school was good in mathematics and he
said he had a problem on the ship he needed to– He needed a new navigator. (54:28) On a
destroyer the position of a navigator is usually of the executive officer who was a lieutenant
commander. At the time I was lieutenant J.G and he said that he wants me to– That if I would
accept the position he would certify me as navigator on the ship, and I’m just sitting there with
my mind blowing because of what he wants me to do. I accepted that thankfully and started
understanding more about what navigation is all about. When you’re standing up three times a
day morning stars, noon, sunline, and evening stars and you’ve got your sextant and a watch and
you start then making a measurement. You’ve got a quartermaster helping you with the timing

�DeGroot, Loren

but you get that information then you go down to the chart room and you go through the
mathematics and say “We are here.” Interesting, my interest in it expanded from just doing the
navigation for the ship of here we are but from understanding the physics of a satellite– Of a star,
I’m sorry. The physics of a star and in order to understand the physics of a star is the same as
understand the physics of a satellite because they are rotating, and all of that gave me an
incredible background for what became my career job after I was out of the Navy and that was
that there was something called GPS that was coming about and GPS was a satellite and it had a
special transmitter on it but the whole idea of it was to do positioning of vehicles on the ground.
Well at the time I was working for Rockwell International in Cedar Rapids, Iowa and we got in a
contract to develop the radio equipment for the satellite reception to drive the displays that were
on submarines and aircraft and trucks and tanks and anything and everything, man power is
included in that. I was quite surprised we were in a four company competition for developing
and producing the first GPS user equipment. User equipment are like the radio in the car and so
forth and so on. Now it wasn’t having a GPS set in the watch as it is today, our first satellite
receiver and processor was probably as half as big as this wall behind me. I at that point came to
understand more about satellites because of what I had learned in the Navy. Amazing
understanding of what can be done with satellites, and I’m sorry Jim I just lost completely the
train of thought.
Interviewer: “Well you mentioned that your company was in the competition with four
other four other companies. Was your company the one that managed to do it?” (59:05)

Yes we made the– We won the competition, there were four companies in the competition for
the end result. There were four different phases of that and one by one they got out of there and
we stayed in as the only one. The thing I wanted to mention a moment ago was the use of the
satellites, now these satellites and the user equipment was available– Our use equipment was
available when the Iraq-Kuwait war began and there is a tremendous story in the first time use of
GPS in a combat situation. My understanding is that it is not talked about much– Was not talked
about much, but GPS equipment from our company was deployed to that combat team that was
in Saudi Arabia that made what I understand was called a left hook. It came up around in Saudi
Arabia and came up behind the Kuwaitis–

�DeGroot, Loren

Interviewer: “Or the Iraqis yeah.”

The Iraqis who were expecting the combat to come in from the ocean. Well all of that was made
possible because we had developed the user equipment and learning that has been a very major
milestone for me because it was my team. I say “my team” it was the team that I had the
privilege of leading that made that equipment available.
Interviewer: “At this point our tape is about up so we’re gonna– Okay alright, we are
restarting here. Alright so basically we’ve now kind of gotten through your active duty
Navy career and then made the connection to your kind of major accomplishment,
professional life as an engineer helping to design the first functional GPS systems. To fill in
a little bit in between when you left active duty did you stay in the naval reserve for a
while?”
No I didn’t, active naval reserve no.
Interviewer: “But inactive– Was there an inactive reserve?” (1:01:45)

I was in the inactive reserve from the time I completed my active duty on the ship. I went back to
Michigan for my master’s degree, as I said, but there was no reserve organization in that area so
they put me in the inactive reserve and I was in the inactive reserve until– I think it was 14 years
after the time I went in.
Interviewer: “Alright, but in the meantime there’s no idea that, you know you have to get
called up for Vietnam or anything like that.”

I was very concerned on two occasions, one of them was the Bay of Pigs. As I said I was a
navigator, when we were in the Mediterranean one day we got special orders to go south of
Puerto Rico to a specified area and do some mapping of the shoreline, because of that I had
special clearances on what was happening and then when the Bay of Pigs– I heard when we were

�DeGroot, Loren

watching on our small television set, the Bay of Pigs was happening and there was no telling
where we were going and I was quite concerned that I might be called up. The second was
during the–
Interviewer: “Cuban Missile Crisis?”

Yes, the Missile Crisis right because of the same thing it was in an area in which we had been
operating and which I as a navigator had become familiar with a lot of things, because of what
they were at the time and my being involved in them I have not spoken of any of that. Now I
think, what? 50 year laters, I haven’t taken off the classification but I think somebody has, but
we were there. I was concerned about getting called up but I was ready for it if it happened and I
go back to the thing that motivated me in the first place. If my nation– If your nation is attacked
because I have had some experience that proved effective I need to be able and willing to meet
those commitments of a citizen of this nation.
Interviewer: “Alright, now I think you’ve probably engaged this pretty well already but if
you kind of look back at your naval experience, overall what do you think you took out of it
or how did it affect you? You got some practical experience obviously with navigation and
satellites.”
Why don’t you ask an easy question? This isn’t being recorded now is it?
Interviewer: “Sure.” (1:05:25)
What did I take away from it? I think I took away from it, seriously now, I’m sure I took away
from it the responsibilities that each of us have as a citizen of this country. That responsibility is
to be sensitive to what others are trying to do to us, that responsibility is that we as a nation must
be prepared to face the very difficult– And when I say face them I mean get to the bottom of
what the cause of the problem is, and very seriously now, I am terribly concerned that we as a
nation are not able to face the current crises that we see in the world. I can’t point to any single
point that I would say “It’s your responsibility.” or yours, what you’re doing here but I think that
trying to pull the whole story together in answer to your question I would say that the thing that I

�DeGroot, Loren

came away with was an understanding of the responsibilities of leadership. In my term in the
Navy whether it was in Rhode Island or Florida or Mediterranean or south Pacific, I knew that it
was my responsibility to do this and this, and in doing that my original commitment to the Navy
that I mentioned at the very beginning with my cousins having been in World War II and so
forth, that when I came out of the Navy I had been trained that I have a responsibility. I can’t just
block it off, in fact today I am very concerned of what we as a nation are doing. I am not 100%
anymore, I don’t know what percentage it is but I do have a problem. Here’s part of my solution
to the problem, but that doesn’t me that it’s not my responsibility to try to do what I can and as
a– We didn’t talk about it earlier but I have a religious conviction that I am responsible and
through that my responsibility to my God is to provide as much leadership as I can and in that,
even as an 80 plus year old I am responsible. Scripture tells me that there is nothing that says it’s
time to retire from your commitments as a believer. I have had many people who have said I
can’t do that I’m too old. No, there’s no place in scripture that says that that comes up. I can’t do
very much, I’m probably 10% left of– I hope, of where I’ve been but I am never too old to
become involved in the leadership position. What is the leadership position when you’re that
old? It can come down to something as powerful as prayer and we need to commit ourselves to
those things because God has a plan. Jeremiah told us when he said in Jeremiah 29:11 “I have a
plan for you’ says the Lord ‘to prosper you, to protect you, to lead you, to guide you.” If you do
that here’s your reward, and then if you look a few verses more you get to what happens if you
don’t and that is if you don’t do that Nebuchadnezzar will come down and take care of you.
(1:11:30) That was verified when Nebuchadnezzar did that and took the nation of Israel prisoner
for 77 years, or 70 years I forget which.
Interviewer: “They’re still arguing about that one.”
Yes, but the point is that we have a lifetime commitment and that’s where I tie the things
together.
Interviewer: “Alright, well I think that makes a pretty good place to conclude so thank you
very much for taking the time to share your story today.”

�DeGroot, Loren

Well this has been wonderful, I couldn’t understand that you have asked these questions many
times.
Interviewer: “And I never get the same answer.”

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919959">
                <text>DeGrootL2108V</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919960">
                <text>DeGroot, Loren</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919961">
                <text>2017-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919962">
                <text>DeGroot, Loren (Interview transcript and video), 2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919963">
                <text>Loren DeGroot was born in Grand Rapids, Michigan in 1935. While he was still in high school, he enlisted in the Naval Reserves. After he graduated high school in 1953, he began classes as Grand Rapids Junior College and then went to the University of Michigan to finish his bachelor’s in engineering. After graduating, he went to officer training in Newport, Rhode Island. In 1957, he joined the crew of a destroyer ship. His first cruise was to the Mediterranean, where he served as a shore patrol officer on the island of Rhodes in Greece. He then went to Piraeus, Greece and spent a total of six months in the Mediterranean before going back to Newport. His home base was then switched to Mayport, Florida where he served as ship’s navigator. After finishing serving his active duty on the ship in 1960, DeGroot joined the inactive Naval Reserve and stayed in it for 14 years. He went back to the University of Michigan to finish his master’s degree.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919964">
                <text>Smither, James (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919965">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="919966">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="919967">
                <text>United States—History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="919968">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="919969">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="919970">
                <text>World War, 1939-1945—Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919971">
                <text>Veterans History Project collection, (RHC-27)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919972">
                <text>Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections &amp; University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919973">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919974">
                <text>In Copyright</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919976">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="919977">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919978">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="985261">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919979">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="23693" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="25896">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/c2c0af2a1c11063ed344b4255a34963e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0b82b6a3a6e5bc67320cc4eb5e509b40</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="432580">
                    <text>Speaking Out
Western Michigan’s Civil Rights Histories
Grand Valley State University Special Collections
Interviewee: Kadi DeHaan
Interviewers: Kelly Petrauskas, Andrew Felice, Fred Helms and Zachary Felice
Supervising Faculty: Melanie Shell-Weiss
Location: Grand Valley State University Special Collections
Date: 3/14/2012

Biography and Description
Kadi DeHaan was in a car accident when she was in high school. She lost feelings and use of her legs.
She has been in rehabilitationand is learning muscle memory. She is in great progress toward her
goal of walking again. She discusses her accident and how it has changed her life.

Transcript
PETRAUSKAS: Could you please give us some basic information about yourself?
DEHAAN: Yes. first of all today is March 14th it’s a Wednesday evening at about 7PM. My name is Kadi
DeHaan and I’m 23 years old. My birthday is April 22, 1988. I come from a family of four, and I have two
older half sisters as well, and one younger sister and I have my parents still. we are in Byron Center
Michigan. I was born in Grand Rapids and I grew up in Byron Center my whole life yeah.
PETRAUSKAS: Airight, could you tell us a little bit about your childhood?
DEHAAN: Yup. When I was a child I remember me and my sister were really close. We were really good
friends. we always, my morn always tell us stories “You always had your sister sit there and you’d have
her play teacher and have her listen” and I remember we’d always go to my grandpa’s. He had a pool,
we went swimming there a lot. We’d have friends over there. in Kindergarten I had a best friend his
name was Jeremy. I came home and said “Mom I met a cute boy on the bus today” and she thought that
was pretty funny. I didn’t tell her what I learned, I just said I met a cute boy. And, him along with like
four other friends lived right behind us. since I was little we went camping every summer, started out at
the Yogi Bear camp grounds in Grand Haven and Silver Lake.
LAJDZIAK: How old is your sister, is your sister pretty close to your age?
DEHAAN: My younger sister is two years younger than me. We hang out a lot, yup. She’s my best friend.
My two older half sisters are 35 and 31. They’re both married and have kids, but we still see one of them
pretty often.
LAJDZIAK: Alright, they still live in Michigan?
DEHAAN: Yeah, one lives in Holland and one lives in Hudsonville.

Page 1

�LAJDZIAK: How old’s your grandpa’s who you said you used to go swim at?
DEHAAN: he passed away about ten years ago.
LAJDZIAK: And he used to live...?
DEHAAN: He used to live on 64th street which was right across the street from us.
LAJDZIAK: Oh airight, so this isn’t your first place?
DEHAAN: No, this isn’t my first house. We actually lived next door for 9 years and we’ve lived here for
three.
LAJDZIAK: Oh, alright.
DEHAAN: But otherwise we grew up on 64th street and like Byron Avenue.
LAJDZIAK: Airight.
DEHAAN: Hrnhmm.
LAJDZIAK: Want to go on to more of uh, middle school and..?
DEHAAN: Yup, in middle school I pretty much had the same friends. I started playing volleyball which I
really enjoyed. I was the setter. And I was just learning as I was starting but it was a lot of fun to me. still
went camping in middle school I guess I’ve done that since I was a baby. I remember in middle school
and the beginning of high school me and my friend Jill used to go roller skating every week at the Byron
hot spot or fun spot or whatever it was called.other than that yeah we went roller skating. Oh, I
remember we’d go to the mall like every Friday night too. We’d play at that Kahunaville. They had
games there and stuff.
LAJDZIAK: In Grand Rapids?
DEHAAN: In, at Rivertown yeah, in Grandville, yeah. Actually I did that with my friend Kara. She started
to become...her and Jill were my two best friends in Middle school. And then as I went on to highschool I
still had the same friends then I started dating Mike Reading. Uh, we dated for about a year about a half,
still played volleyball in high school. I went to the school dances. I enjoyed doing that. Really just to hang
out with my friends, we’d do normal...hang out at each others houses whatever
PETRAUSKAS: So how long have you played volleyball, when did you first start playing volleyball and
when, how long and how late did you play volleyball.
DEHAAN: I played volleyball from 7th grade until 10th grade.
PETRAUSKAS: And was that the only sport you played throughout that period of time?
DEHAAN: Yes. That was the only sport that I played. yeah.
PETRAUSKAS: Did you play any recreational, like at home, with your friends at the beach?

Page 2

�DEHAAN: I played at the beach and with my friends. Rollerblading was my favorite thing to do, I loved to
rollerblade.
PETRAUSKAS: Would you go certain places for rollerblading, would you go down any certain trails?
DEHAAN: We’d go down the Kent trail and then I’d also go in Grand Haven just all over town.
PETRAUSKAS: And so tell us about like your freshman and sophomore year in high school. Just kid of
basically like you said you went to a bunch of dances and stuff, like how many dances did you guys have
each year?
DEHAAN: Ok. like each year we had homecoming, sweatheart dance and then prom was junior and
senior year. I went to most of them ‘cause I was dating this guy and we had to go together. yeah.
LAJDZIAK: You dated him through sophomore year then, 10th grade?
DEHAAN: Yes. Actually up to 11th grade.
LAJDZIAK: Up to 11th grade...and was he the one you were chasing.
DEHAAN: Yes.
LAJDZIAK: Airight.
PETRAUSKAS: Hahaha.
LAJDZIAK: I guess I shouldn’t move into that then haha. I was just wondering.
PETRAUSKAS: So, you said you were dating for about three years or so?
DEHAAN: We dated for like a year and a half. Like the last six months of the relationship wasn’t great so,
like we were gonna break up soon anyways.
LAJDZIAK: That was around junior year?
DEHAAN: Yeah.
LAJDZIAK: Junior year..
PETRAUSKAS: So what kind of music did you listen to back in the day?
DEHAAN: Oh, I thought I was ganster back in the day so I listened to rap music, drover my car really fast,
windows down. Yes, I thought I was pretty cool.
PETRAUSKAS: And what kind of car did you drive?
DEHAAN: I had a ‘97 Pontiac Bonneville. My mother gave it to me.
PETRAUSKAS: That was very nice of her.
DEHAAN: She got a new one. That was her old car.

Page 3

�LAJDZIAK: Cool.
DEHAAN: Mhmm.
FELICE: So when you were driving really fast with the windows down and the music up were you being
safe?
DEHAAN: I would get on the highway, I was just telling my teacher this the other day, I would get on the
highway and I would go like a hundred. So stupid. I think of it now like I was crazy.
LAJDZIAK: Yeah..
DEHAAN: Mhmm.
PETRAUSKAS: And had you ever been pulled over?
DEHAAN: No.
PETRAUSKAS: No?
DEHAAN: Nope.
LAJDZIAK: No tickets?
DEHAAN: No tickets.
PETRAUSKAS: That’s good for you.
LAJDZIAK: Did you get your permit when you were 16...14 and 9 months?
DEHAAN: Oh I got it probably the day I could get it, yeah ‘cause when I was..before I could drive I would
mow the lawn and I would drive my moms car up and down our little cul de-sac here like, for hours. So I
was very excited to get my license.
LAJDZIAK: Yeah, kind of living out here, with all the space you could get on different things whether it’s a
lawn mower or a four wheeler or..
DEHAAN: Yeah. We had a four wheeler too. (Whispering): So should I say that one day I was hanging out
with my boyfriend and we got in an argument and tell that whole story?
LAJDZIAK: Yeah, yeah.
PETRAUSKAS: Ok, so tell us a little bit more about your junior year. What happened after you
sophomore year?
DEHAAN: Ok, my junior year I was just having so much fun in high school, I loved it. I hung out with my
friends a lot. I wasn’t home much, I was always with my friends. a couple months into the school year on
October 8, 2004, I was hanging out with my boyfriend at the time and we had gotten into an argument
and he left his house and I followed, I was gonna go home. I was driving behind him, trying to catch up
with him, and the road, the roads were not great. It was dark out, it was raining. I was driving, I

Page 4

�remember I was driving over. I came over the hill and I saw the red light and thought “oh ,it’ll turn green
soon, I can just go and speed around all these people and I can catch up to him. Well I thought wrong
and I hydroplaned and went into oncoming traffic where a car hit me and I flew out of the windshield
and my car blew up after that, which I didn’t have my seatbelt on which I was lucky for then So the
ambulance came, I don’t remember much after this but I guess I was giving them everybody’s phone
numbers like my moms, my boyfriends and I was like “you have to call them! Blah blah blah.” And so
they brought me to the hospital and they got a hold of my parents...and they, my parents came down
and when my parents got there, they wouldn’t tell them what happened to me. They said they had to go
in this back room with somebody and my mom, she just knew I was dead. She, she just knew it because
they always, they tell what’s wrong with whoever’s at the hospital unless like something really really bad
has happened. So when the doctor finally came out and told my parents what happened, I broke my
neck and I have a C5-C6 spinal cord injury which means, I couldn’t move my legs, my hands were
affected uh, but I still had feeling. But I couldn’t move any thing. (Whispering): So do you want me to
just go on, keep going into the care.
PETRAUSKAS: So like how long...you had said you passed out blacked out after you came out of the car.
was there a certain time you remember regaining, like, thought and knowing where you were?
DEHAAN: Yeah, it was a couple days later. The first memory I have of being in the hospital is uh, one of
the nurses washing my hair.
LAJDZIAK: So you were in the hospital for a couple...?
DEHAAN: I was in intensive care for three weeks and at first I couldn’t even breathe on my own. They
had like a ventilator down my throat helping me breathe and they didn’t even know if I would get off
that.
LAJDZIAK: Wow.
DEHAAN: Mhmrn.
PETRAUSKAS: And have you talked to your parents about that first day and how they felt when they first
received that call or anything along those lines?
DEHAAN: Yes, I actually just talked about it to my mom yesterday actually and she said she was just
numb. She doesn’t remember like the first two weeks, she wouldn’t come home from the hospital and
finally when she did for a little bit to sleep she got a call from her friend and her friend was like “are you
sitting down? Are you sitting down?” She’s like “what are you talking about?” And she’s like “I heard it
on the news, Kadi died.” And my mom’s like “what?! I was just up there, no she didn’t.” And so my mom
freaked out, hung up and called my dad and was like “is she ok?! Is she ok?!” And he’s like “Yes she’s
fine, the news had it wrong. She’s perfectly fine, I’m sitting here right with her right now.” And my
mom’s like “you’re lying to me, just because I’m not there!”and he’s like “no I’m not, she’s really ok.” So
just, she doesn’t remember.. she didn’t even remember how to get home. She couldn’t’ even think.
LAJDZIAK: How well, like other family like your sister that you’re close tO...

Page 5

�DEHAAN: My sister was a mess too and I guess the first time I got to talk to her I said “Ally it’s ok, the
doctor said I just might have to be in a wheelchair a little while.” And she just started bawling, but I
just...
LAJDZIAK: So they came to the hospital too?
DEHAAN: Yeah, they were there that night, yeah. And I still had a sense of humor, I was, I told my mom I
was like, before I was going in the surgery I was like “mom, will you check my nose for any boogers? Like
there might be a cute doctor in there or something,”
LAJDZIAK: How about like grandparents, family friends, long time family friends. How did they react?
DEHAAN: Everyone was just shocked and my grandparents were up there I remember, well I don’t
remember, I remember because I was told. A lot of my friends and people I hardly knew in high school
tried coming to visit me, but they wouldn’t allow visitors while I was in intensive care.
LAJDZIAK: And then when you got out of intensive care you came back here? Were you in the hospital
for a while longer?
DEHAAN: I went to Marry Free Bed for three months where, like when I went there I was still on the
feeding tube, I kinda slowly got better. Like when I was in intensive care they finally, I like lean myself off
the ventilator so I could breathe on my own. Otherwise I would have still been there I think. so they let
me go to Marry Free Bed with just a feeding tube where that’s pretty much where I was going to live in
my wheelchair.
PETRAUSKAS: In intensive care I know you have a little bit of, you kind of found some humor in certain
things like what exactly went through you head? What were you thinking when you kind of figured out
what happened, and what you were doing now, where you were at? What were you thinking about the
future? Anything along those lines.
DEHAAN: I don’t think I did think about the future. I think I just thought of the moment and was just
going to get through it. I didn’t think bad thoughts, like every time somebody was like “oh no!” I was like
“it’ll be ok.” Like I was doing the best out of everybody so..
PETRAUSKAS: So you basically just tried to remain positive and use that to your advantage?
DEHAAN: Yeah, exactly.
LAJDZIAK: So basically when you came, finally came back home what...how did was, did that feel I
guess? I mean obviously it had to be different but maybe you were like in bed like stuck for a while and
couldn’t really move at all?
DEHAAN: when I was at Marry Free Bed for a while I didn’t want to move because it was scary, like being
in a wheelchair and I like couldn’t, like, do anything I thought I was going to fall out like, I had straps all
over me and my mom was like “you can’t take those off it’ll look silly” and I was like “no!” Also, I forgot I
had a halo for three months as well because I broke my neck and it was screwed into my skull in four

Page 6

�places to hold my neck still. So that means I couldn’t take a shower for three months, I had to take a
bath in bed everyday. And it was just, not fun.
PETRAUSKAS: Were they feeding you through the tubes and everything?
DEHAAN: Finally I remember, my dad, he would because I had to eat so many calories a day before they
took the feeding tube out, so he would like pretend that I ate because he didn’t want me to be on it
anymore but like even they would have me eat like a Kit Kat or something because I wasn’t, I just didn’t
have an appetite. I think I lost like twenty pounds and I was, I wasn’t big to begin with so, yeah. Okay
then you said after, oh yeah so coming home from the hospital was scary, like, there wasn’t gonna be all
that help there was just gonna be my parents and my sister helping me, and I really thought it was, it
was really scary but got through it and I just, I knew that I was just gonna just get out of this wheel chair.
I wasn’t gonna live like they told me I was gonna, I was gonna do everything I could to walk again. Which
I really think helped my positive attitude and helped me going because it just, just did. I remember...
LAJDZIAK: Did you come back to, is this the house you were living in? Next door?
DEHAAN: No, this is not the house. Yes, next door is where we lived. When I got in my car accident my
dad was in the process of building this house, so he pretty much just stopped building because he was
gonna have to make changes, so.
PETRAUSKAS: Then what changes, and like I know your parents had to deal with the situation kind of as
it came, uh and so what renovations and what things can they do to make uh, more suitable for you or
for the family?
DEHAAN: Mhmm..They had to widen the doors, It’s a pretty open floor plan so they didn’t have to do a
ton. And then they also put an elevator in our house and some of our floors were sunken like that. Like
the whole living room was supposed to be sunken so they raised that up. But, Other than that they
didn’t do... They basically just widening the door ways and the elevator.
FELICE: How did your daily activities change during this period?
DEHAAN: During this period I couldn’t do anything by myself. Like, make meals, I could hardly eat by
myself because my hands were not great at all. like, showering I needed help with that. I needed help
getting dressed. Like everything changed. I totally lost my independency and I was so independent
before the car accident. So it was, it was totally different but I mean I had so much support that it
helped me so much. Like,my mom was there with me all the time, my sister was there all the time, my
dad helped me with everything. Most people, they’ll get like a care-giving or something but its nicer with
just my family helping me.
LAJDZIAK: How about like you said you had a couple best friends, like are they still around?
DEHAAN: Yes. Right after my car accident my best friend Jill, she visited me a lot. Like, I was able to go
out on outings while I was at Mary Free Bed so she’d come up and we’d goout to dinner. My mom
would come with, obviously. But we’d go to dinner, we’d go to the mall or we’d go to a movie or
something. Uh, she stuck by me like, so much. We hung out like every single day. my other best friends

Page 7

�were Tiffany and Kara and they came and visited a couple times but just, that was about it. I mean we
still stayed friends but we weren’t like best friends like we were. Everybody was just kinda like in shock
and didn’t really know how to treat me after the accident
FELICE: Did you grow closer to your friends and family after the accident?
DEHAAN: My family for sure, definitely. After about a year of me and Jill hanging out we kinda just went
our separate ways. Like she got a job after the accident. And she went to beauty school and I was in, I
was going to Davenport. (whispering) I guess this was still in high school wasn’t it? So through high
school we were still really good friends but after that...
LAJDZIAK: And then were you able to finish out high school.. (inaudible)
DEHAAN: Yeah, I got out of the hospital in about January I think. And then I went back to school in
February. Which my sister helped me a ton, like going to classes ‘cause I didn’t have like a wheelchair I
could push, they just gave me one like that I was sent home with. So I needed a lot of help after the
accident.
LAJDZIAK: And your sister was a freshman?
DEHAAN: Yeah she was fourteen.
PETRAUSKAS: So she was taking care of you most of the time and was there by your side?
DEHAAN: Yeah. She had to grow up fast.
PETRAUSKAS: And then kind of back to more of your friends again.
DEHAAN: Mhmm?
PETRAUSKAS: That boyfriend you said to have been chasing that night. How did your relationship end up
with him?
DEHAAN: He came up to the hospital the night of and kept saying “it’s all my fault it’s all my fault” ‘cause
he knew that he saw the car accident and he kept driving. So that’s why he thought it was all his fault.
LAJDZIAK: But he didn’t know you were chasing him? Or just...
DEHAAN: He knew it was me, he didn’t stop to help.
LAJDZIAK: Really?
DEHAAN: Yes. So he came up a couple more times. I still wanted to be with him but just, it was so smart
that I am not with him any more. So smart.
LAJDZIAK: ‘Cause it was kinda already...
DEHAAN: It was kinda already going down hill anyways, so..
LAJDZIAK: And then you don’t keep in touch with him at all or anything?

Page 8

�DEHAAN: No, no. Nope.
LAJDZIAK: And then after...most, majority of people after high school kinda just moved on and...
DEHAAN: Yeah, I kinda talked to one friends from high school but that’s about it. Made new friends in
college and...
LAJDZIAK: And how about them, are they coming over all the time? And do things with them?
DEHAAN: Yep. Going over their house, coming over. They got to meet me after the car accident so it was
nothing to them of the wheelchair. That was just how they knew me. they’re helpful. They help me in
wherever I go. I have one friend John who will carry me anywhere. And then his fiancé Tara is one of my
good friends. Stephanie I hang out with a lot. We go downtown, go shopping, watch our nightly shows
together
LAJDZIAK: Do you feel like your friends in high school treated you differently than your friends in college
just because they knew you before the accident, during the accident?
DEHAAN: I wouldn’t say so much treating me differently I would say we just grew apart and, yeah, it was
bound to happen I think. Whether, if the car accident happened or not.
LAJDZIAK: Yeah, once you leave high school you...
DEHAAN: Yeah.
PETRAUSKAS: And I know you kinda explained uh, that you were over here a lot and you went over there
a lot. I know you guys made modifications here to suit your daily life, how difficult was it to go hang out
at other places like their homes, that may not be as nearly accessible to your...
DEHAAN: Well really when I get asked to a friends house I’m like, well can I get in? But if it was with John
I didn’t really worry because he just carried me everywhere, then I just had to worry about if I could fit in
the bathroom which is normally I can’t fit in the bathroom anywhere. So I didn’t really worry about it a
lot but it was always in the back of my mind. “Is this gonna be ok? Am I gonna be able to get in the
house?” so a iot of times I had friends over here but if they have people over there, I go over to their
houses and it didn’t matter, he’ll carry me anywhere. So..
PETRAUSKAS: How about when you go out in public, like to stores or restaurants. How, how different is
that?
DEHAAN: I get stared at a lot. I get rude comments, I get really nice comments. the staring is everywhere
I go. Like every time I go out I get starred at. So I’m just used to it now. My sister, she’s with me she will
stand up for me. But half the time nobody sees anyone staring at me just ‘cause its be like seven years.
But at first it was hard to deal with. Like I’m like “Why is everyone staring at me?” And my mom would
always tell me “oh it’s just because you’re so pretty” and I’m like “yeah right mom.” Haha yeah...
KADI’S DAD: Can I interject?
LAJDZIAK: Yeah.

Page 9

�KADI’S DAD: When we go on vacation, planned vacation, we go to Mexico or we go to Jamaica. We do
have to take into account that we have to find the handicap accessible place down there so, we do look
for things like that.
LAJDZIAK: Would you say that in other countries its not as like access...as like...I feel like in the US I feel
like most places are kinda required to have that be accessible and then when you go down to Mexico is
that very different?
KADI’S DAD: Well like I said, we had to look at several different resorts to find the one that was capable
of handling her so.
PETRAUSKAS: How about transportation like on the flights and stuff. I can only imagine how difficult that
is.
KADI’S DAD: I carry her on and off the busses down there, stuff like that.
DEHAAN: They do have people to assist at airports to carry me on and off, but if my family’s with they’ll
just carry me instead. that brings up another thing I’ve been to Russia 10 times for steam cells, that is a
whole trip in itself, for not being accessible, where we go I mean its for people who cant walk and are in
wheel chairs so the place is accessible. But its just a culture shock and people who are in accidents there
and are in wheel chairs there they go to live in an institution because they don’t have houses there its all
apartments so they don’t have elevators they just go upstairs so everybody who is in an accident is just
taking away from their family and they live in an institution. Where they pretty much just don’t do
anything. So yea but I been to Russia for stem cells they are embryonic..not embryonic they are my own
stem cells they come from my bone maro.m we kinda check into this like a year after... 2 years after my
accident. You want me to keep going on that.
LAJDZIAK: Yeah
DEHAAN: Two years after my accident it was my first trip there it was in june of 2006 my mom did a ton
of research and I actually knew somebody who went there and was getting good results from this.. so I
was like well heck yea lets give it a try, and since my injury was incomplete that means there is like a
chance for me to recover. So that’s a good spinal cord injury if you could say there is a good one. That’s
what it is incomplete. So yea the first time I went there they did a.. I got shots for 4 days which made the
stem cells from my bone maro flow into my blood and then they did a blood transfusion to get then
stem cells out. And then they put them into like 20 vials so that each time I went back I would get like 2
injections. after the first visit I was able to sweat again which sounds funny because you don’t think that
because you have a spinal cord injury you cant sweat but yess, and the sun worshoper that I am it was
nice to get back into the sun and not almost pass out. So after the first 3 timess..
LAJDZIAK: So you go back there every...?
DEHAAN: I went every 3 months in the beginning, so it was almost like we got home and we went back
again. I was also doing therapy here, in the United states. Detriot so almost 2 aand a half hours away
from my house, so intense therapy 4 days a week, 3 hours a day. then they finally got one closer to my
house in grand rapids. So I was doing that at the same time while getting these injections because if you
Page
10

�don’t do therapy and get these injections it doesn’t help you. You have to be doing tharepy while getting
them.
LAJDZIAK: So I just promotes healing..
DEHAAN: It like.., how do I word this..it reconnects the nerves in the spinal cord so that the connection
can go through again.
LAJDZIAK: Yeah right.
DEHAAN: What happened to my spinal cord it was like brusied not like cevered or anything. So I don’t
know.
FELICE: So does like the therapy like try to stimulate the nerves and try to get them to work
DEHAAN: At therapy yes.. before when I wasn’t able to walk. like do anything with my legs. They would
like walk them for me. and I would just do like core strengthening, hand therapy, all sorts of things to try
to walk again.
LAJDZIAK: So the stem cell what is it called
PETRAUSKAS: Stem cells
LAJDZIAK: So the stem cell in Russia helped your hands too
DEHAAN: Yeah it held everything.
LAJDZIAK: Alright
DEHAAN: Yea the stem cells after about 3 trips going there. I was at therapy one day and they were
walking my legs on the paralla bar like they always did and all of a suddenly I lifted up my right leg. They
were like woah, do it again, so I did it again. So like my physical therapist was like try it with the other
one. So I lifted up my left like and everybody was like holy crap.. am I aloud to say crap?
LAJDZIAK: Yeah
DEHAAN: They were just like shocked and it was like not controlled at all. But it was like I was still lifting
up my leg. And moving it forward. So the walking definitely came from the stem cells.
LAJDZIAK: Quickly
DEHAAN: Yeah and obviously I had to go to therapy on top of the stem cells. Or the stem cell wouldn’t
know what to do, so I continued that for probably like a year. With being able to lift my legs and little bit
but still needing assistance. And then after so long I was able to control my legs on my own. Like I still
couldn’t move them when I was sitting in my chair but when I would stand up. I was able to walk
LAJDZIAK: Are you still going to Russia for stem cells?
DEHAAN: I haven’t been to Russia in 2 years.

Page
11

�LAJDZIAK: Instead of going to Russia your just continuing therapy
DEHAAN: Yeah I’m continuing to do therapy, probably after the walking was going really good like no
assistance just like walking canes. But no body had to stand behind me or anything thing. I got
phenomena and it set me back a year which is crazy I never know phenomena could effect my walking
but it did. And then after a year of being set back I was able to do it again I had to slowly, re learn pretty
much.. my walking again. And then when I got doing really good again I hurt my back and have a
herniated disk at L5 Si. I got hurt at therapy. I aslo have really bad spasms, like muscle spasms in my legs
like my leg will kick straight and you cant hardly bend it those got worse when the herniated disk
happened. Because my reaction to pain is more spasms, if that makes sense.
LAJDZIAK: Where you at know like being able to walk... and ?
DEHAAN: Ok the herniated disk happened two years ago I couldn’t do anything. For at least a year.
Couldn’t even stand my left leg it was just stay straight up in the air. Like it wouldn’t stay down. I
couldn’t drive...m last year... im trying to think., my years get so mixed up.. for probably a year now I
have been back to being able to walk again. On Monday I walked 2 laps around the track, without
stopping which is huge for me. Today I walked 1 and a half laps. Which is.. one lap is 542 feet. When I
first started walking I would go 20 feet and have to sit down and then I would go more like a 100 feet
and have to sit down. And then like 200 feet.
LAJDZIAK: Do you get tired or is it like painful?
DEHAAN: Its not painful at all. Tired I get fatigued.. more like my walking gets sloppy and ill sit down and
rest and my walking will get better when I stand back up.
LAJDZIAK: So you don’t use like anything to help you walk?
DEHAAN: I use walking canes and my trainer does stand behind me just incase.
LAJDZIAK: And you said you had a fractured disk like a L5 51
DEHAAN: I hurt it at therapy.. I don’t know how that happened.. I think I was walking at therapy and I
went to fall and my trainer grabbed me by this belt I have so I was like hanging there by this belt and my
back like twisted wrong.. and my parents both have back problems too so it hereditary.
LAJDZIAK: But you don’t experience any pain like right now? Kadi right now no.. I did have pain I was like
sweating all the time and just deprived me from walking.
LAJDZIAK: how did you get phenomena if you don’t mind me asking.
DEHAAN: I got sick and my lungs weren’t good I guess.
LAJDZIAK: I have had phenomena too so I was just wondering.
FELICE: It seems like your life has had a lot of turmoil have you offered you story to other people as like
insperiation.

Page
12

�DEHAAN: I feel like my story does inspire people even like where I work out these people see me for 6
years and they’ll come up to me and say like heyy your doing really good, and they notice me up there
walking and when I’m not up there walking. So they say I do inspire a lot of people. Actually yesterday I
went to talk a drivers training class. Talk to them about, driving in conditions either you emotions are
different or the weather is effected.
PETRAUSKAS: Explain a little bit about how driving ahs changed since the accident. So your able to do
the old way what kind of new stuff did you have to learn to drive again.
DEHAAN: I had to take drivers training all over again. I started driving like this huge bus van. Like it was
ginormous and I took it in Detroit, where I was doing therapy. He said I would probably need like 20 or
30 hours of driving. I did like 10 and he said I was good because I caught onto it real fast. I have to drive
with hand controls so I haveone hand on the steering wheel and one hand on my left hand does the gas
and break you pull for the gas and push for the break. so that was a learning a whole new way of driving
but it didn’t seem abnormal.
PETRAUSKAS: And your able to drive by yourself?
DEHAAN: Yeah I’m able to drive by myself. I have a van that has a ramp on it so I just hit the button door
opens and the ramp comes down.
LAJDZIAK: So you go right out the back then
DEHAAN: No it’s the side.
LAJDZIAK: So the whole driver side?
DEHAAN: It’s the passenger side; you like wanna see it don’t you.
LAJDZIAK: Yeah I wanna see what it looks like.. ohh the white one
DEHAAN: Yea so the door opens and the ramp like its folded up and it flips down.
LAJDZIAK: But you can drive right?
DEHAAN: Yeah I drive from my chair.
LAJDZIAK: Ohh alright so there is like no driver seat.
DEHAAN: Yeah no driver seat.
FELICE: How does your chair like lock in?
DEHAAN: There’s a bolt that it locks in.
PETRAUSKAS: And so your still able to cruse down the road with your windows down?
DEHAAN: Yes haha but I don’t go as fast
LAJDZIAK: How bout the rap music
Page
13

�DEHAAN: Noo no rap music country all the way.
LAJDZIAK: Thats what we had to listen to on the way over.
PETRAUSKAS: Excuse me
LAJDZIAK: Do they make a lot of cars like that?
DEHAAN: They do make trucks I know. I didn’t want one of those because I hate the snow and you have
to like transfer when you get in, and I like to be in and out. I know they make trucks, vans, and some
people don’t have anything they just lift themselves in and they have hand controls.
LAJDZIAK: Is that like a private company that did it or did Honda do it?
DEHAAN: It’s a Toyota so. the Toyota van goes to its called clock conversions. They are on 68th street
luckly they’re close., and they modify everything
PETRAUSKAS: My question is how financially difficult this has been to get everything to par with where
your at in life.
DEHAAN: Yea that’s a good question. Since I was in an auto accident my insurance they pay for like
everything that I would need which I am so fortunate for like there are so many expenses. They bought
my van 70 thousand dollars. Like I would not be driving if I had to pay 70 thousand dollars there’s no
way. luckily my parents were able to pay for every trip to Russia, which is also not cheap. So fortunately
auto insurance pays for everything I need so that my parents are able to afford things like going to
Russia.
LAJDZIAK: When you like did the company like clock conversion did they recommend a certain car for
you to get?
DEHAAN: My first one was a dodge caravan and then the contract that was up and had to get me a new
one.
PETRAUSKAS: So of course, I think you already touched on it that you enjoy driving.
DEHAAN: Yeah
PETRAUSKAS: Do you like to drive?
DEHAAN: mhmm, yup
LAJDZIAK: And then...How about seatbelts? Do you feel like your keen on them or not?
DEHAAN: Now I always wear my seat belt.
LAJDZIAK: Do you tell other people to put on their seatbelts before you start the car?
DEHAAN: Yes, I do. And my passenger seat has the beeper, so it doesn’t stop beeping until you put the
seatbelt on so.

Page
14

�FELICE: Do you think in the future you want to more stuff like talk to drivers ed classes about driver’s
safety and stuff.
DEHAAN: Yeah, I totally would. Yeah, I think that would be really good. Maybe that will teach them to
slow down, and not think they are so cool, drive fast.
PETRAUSKAS: When you driving, just knowing what has happened in the past. Do you ever think of that
when you’re driving? Or do you think of anything bad possibly happening again? Or anything like that?
DEHAAN: Sometimes I think of something bad happening again. Like if people try to get in my lane. I’m
just like woo, what are you doing? It freaks me out. l would say my driving in the rain still does scare me
still. l can’t see when its dark out and it’s raining. Everything just like blurs together. so that defiantly still
scares me. But otherwise driving on nice days...
LAJDZIAK: Do you try to avoid driving on days where...
DEHAAN: I wouldn’t say I avoid, I’m just extra cautious.
FELICE: Have you driven by the spot of the accident?
DEHAAN: Yeah, and actually for a while there was a burn mark for years. They cover it up, finally they
repaved a year ago...last summer maybe. Yeah. It didn’t bother me to drive over that spot.
PETRAUSKAS: How often do you actually do it? Do you maybe make time out of your day and just go,
every once and a while, and visit that spot?
DEHAAN: No, I would say I visit that spot. But its right in town, it’s on my way in to Byron Center. So if
I’m going into town, I’m going to pass it. Half the time I don’t think twice what happened there.
LAJDZIAK: I got questions but he’s distracting me. how about the car? Did they junk the car or?
DEHAAN: Yeah yup
LAJDZIAK: How did you get hit during the accident? Was it a head on collision or?
DEHAAN: I don’t know. I think it was from the back the way the picture looks. But I don’t remember. l
think probably from the back which made me go through the windshield, and go forward. The side?
FELICE: It looks like the explosion was from the gas tank.
LAJDZIAK: What about the other driver of the car that hit you?
DEHAAN: The other...it was a couple who are like my parents age, because my mom went to high school
with them. They were completely fine. Except for the next day she had stomach pain. So she went to the
hospital and they actually found cancer. So it was actually a good thing for them because otherwise she
may not have thought anything was wrong.
LAJDZIAK: Did they visit you at the hospital or anything?

Page
15

�DEHAAN: You know what? I’m not sure if they did. I know they talked to my mom and they felt really
bad and she was like it’s not your fault, it’s hers. So...l didn’t get ticketed for it or anything.
PETRAUSKAS: have you met these people and have communicated with them since the accident?
DEHAAN: No, Nope. I know of who they are because I graduate with their daughter. But I didn’t talk to
them after or anything.
LAJDZIAK: I would be like asking them, what did I look like?
DEHAAN: No. I guess after the car accident, my face was just a mess.
LAJDZIAK: Really?
DEHAAN: Yeah. It was all bruised. This side of my face was all bruised. And I have a scare here from
something. Maybe glass. I don’t know. This is my only other scare on my elbow. So it was almost like I
flew out of my car, because I flew 40 feet.
LAJDZIAK: And then on to the cement?
DEHAAN: Yeah. But it was like I cover my face like this or something. I don’t know. Another weird thing
about my car accident was my purse was in the front seat and my back pack was in the back seat, and
the both ended up in the hospital room. Nobody knows how they got there. Nobody knows how they
got out of the car. Yeah, that was kind of weird.
LAJDZIAK: what about any eye witnesses or anything like that? Kind of embellish on what they saw.
DEHAAN: I don’t remember eye witnesses of the car accident. I remember like my...l don’t know what
he’s called at the high school...just superintendent maybe or something. He came out and he actually
grabbed me off the road and pulled me into the grass. but...I know I told my mom this yesterday, you
should have took a picture of my face. She’s like, Kadi I couldn’t even think. I was like, well I wanted to
see what it looked like.
LAJDZIAK: He kind of mentioned it, the news really blew up over this situation
DEHAAN: Yeah
LAJDZIAK: How did that affect you?
DEHAAN: I dint know for a long time that I had died. My parents didn’t tell me. My sister didn’t tell me.
One of my friends was like hey, I thought you died. I was like what? My sister was like shhh. So she
didn’t want me to know. But...l think the news over reacts about a lot of things, and messes a lot of
things up. So I don’t listen to them a lot.
LAJDZIAK: Did they like interview you or anything like that?
DEHAAN: After words...news 8 was the one the messed up and said I died. So when I started walking, I
remember, the paper, the Grand Rapids press did articles about me. The news did one because for my

Page
16

�21 5t birthday I walked into the bar. That was with help obviously. But...yeah that was big. So was on the
news then. It actually made national news.
LAJDZIAK: really?
DEHAAN: yeah. Mhmm.
LAJDZIAK: they really didn’t, I guess, approach your family or anything like that?
DEHAAN: No. like they usually do? No.
FELICE: Do you feel like your life has less privacy after the accident because of this?
DEHAAN: yeah. Yeah. Especially seeing doctors. My modesty, I don’t have any anymore.
LAJDZIAK: So when you see doctors?
DEHAAN: Yeah, I did at first. I don’t now. But so that is nice after I could stop seeing doctors. It was like
every week, I had to go to the doctor. It was so old. I just wanted to live my life and be normal.
LAJDZIAK: how? l can’t think what I was going to say now.
PETRAUSKAS: How about...l don’t know if we talked about this yet. your education. You dealt with the
accident and you got yourself through high school. Where did you decide to go to college? What did you
decide to go into?
DEHAAN: I think before the accident I wanted to go to western with all my friends or something. Then
after the accident I was like well I need to stay somewhere close to home because I can’t go far away. I
can’t move out. So then I decided davenport. I got a full ride scholarship there, all because I wrote a
letter. So that was exciting. where was I going with this? What did you ask?
PETRAUSKAS: What did you decide to go into when you got to davenport?
DEHAAN: Oh ok. I wanted to go into accounting. Then I took accounting 1 and it was a little harder than I
thought, but I was still going to go into it. So then I tried to take accounting 2. I took it four times to pass.
So I was like, after the second time of not passing, I was like I’m switching my major ASAP. So I went into
sports marketing. Got a degree in that.
LAJDZIAK: And then, you are now with a realtor. Did you try to look at any jobs when you graduated?
DEHAAN: When I graduated I wasn’t really in to looking for a job then, because I was focused on my
physical therapy. last fall I was like, ok, I have had my degree for a year; I need to do something with it
or I’m never going to get anywhere. So I got an internship with a property management company. That
lasted 3 months. I was doing their marketing for them. I made there brochure, I made flyers, all that sort
of thing. Then he like said, “Hey, yeah, you’re probably going to get a job here.” So I was excited. He said
probably just in a few months is when we will financially be able to give you a job. Well he just hired 4
more interns. So he did it that way, the free way. And I was actually on craigslist one day, just searching.
I never still looked hard for a job because I needed who would be flexible with my schedule, to be able

Page
17

�to do physical therapy still. So one day I was just looking on craigslist and found this part time job, make
good money, doing marketing for a real estate company. So it was kind of similar to what I did for my
internship, but still different. So I interviewed, and he gave me the job on the spot. And they too had to
make modifications for me. Actually when I got the interview, I drove by the place and there was two big
steps to get in. So I was bummed. Because now I’m not going to be able to get in, and I really wanted
this job. So that is something too. If I get an interview, I have to be careful, like I have check out the
place pretty much before I go. To see if someone needs to come with me or if I’m going to be able to go
by myself. So I just called him and was like hey here is my story. I’m in a wheel chair, do you have a back
door or anything? Can we meet somewhere different from the office? He’s like yeah, no problem. And
most people would probably hang up or just say oh well I found someone else. Or forget it. Yeah.
LAJDZIAK: SO you feel like, do people at your internship and your job now do you feel they treat you...
DEHAAN: Oh they treat me totally fine. It just depends on the person.
LAJDZIAK: Oh really.
DEHAAN: Yeah, here is another story. I am looking for a new trainer to come to my house to work out.
And I put an ad on craigslist. They will write me for it. I will write them my background and tell them my
story, and hey, this is what I’m looking to do. And they won’t write back. So...
PETRAUSKAS: How about like once you’re graduated and you were actually looking for a marketing job,
did you get interview for multiple companies or anything like that? Have you ever been judged
differently in an interview or anything along those lines?
DEHAAN: Actually the two interviews I had, work out great. So I guess when I got judged was before an
interview when they would email me back and I would tell them my situation. So I learned to just not
tell people my situation before I go into an interview. And then it was totally fine.
LAJDZIAK: Why do you think they would, where not replying?
DEHAAN: People just don’t know how to approach somebody who’s different then you I’d guess I’d say.
FELICE: When you’re out in public do you think people have prejudice against you? Judging you before
they even get to know you.
DEHAAN: Yes. Oh I totally...yeah. I totally get that a lot. A lot of people just don’t get to know me
because they see the wheelchair. People don’t know how to act, and most of the time it comes off as
rudeness to me.
FELICE: What do you think they are thinking about you?
DEHAAN: Well I just think that they, maybe, I don’t know what they think about me. I just...
LAJDZIAK: Do you think majority of people like you said you have heard comments and people star,
other than the staring and stuff like that, do you think the majority of people are just not use to the
situation?

Page
18

�DEHAAN: Yeah, I think so. I just think they are not use to it. And some people are, I don’t know, they like
the way their friends look. They like convenience. Friends who aren’t in a wheelchair can get up and go
wherever, whenever they want. I mean I can too but it takes me a little longer. And I have to think of
things before I do them so...
LAJDZIAK: In your job now, they don’t...medical expenses...I guess that doesn’t have anything to do with
a job.
DEHAAN: No.
PETRAUSKAS: Or any type of benefits or anything along those lines?
DEHAAN: Like what do you mean?
PETRAUSKAS: Does your job offer any type of benefits?
DEHAAN: No, because it is part time. So then I’m still covered under my...l will always be under my auto
insurance and they will always have to pay until I am completely better. Yeah.
LAJDZIAK: I have to have insurance.
DEHAAN: it’s sad because if someone dives into a pooi, they don’t have auto insurance and nothing is
paid for.
PETRAUSKAS: So luckily this happened in a vehicle.
DEHAAN: Yeah
PETRAUSKAS: in that case, you were covered.
DEHAAN: Yeah. Even those people in swimming accidents, go get in the car after you were in that
accident because everything will be paid for. Like hospital bills, everything. My bill for intensive care was
300,000 dollars.
LAJDZIAK: What’s your insurance? Do you know what auto insurance you have?
DEHAAN: Grange
PETRAUSKAS: Now that we are getting personal, how has this affected your personal life?
DEHAAN: I guess I don’t let it.
PETRAUSKAS: I know you said you friends and stuff, you kind of went your separate ways after a certain
time periods or when you got to the college level, how has it affected you dealing with people every
day, maybe finding, you talked about cute doctors and stuff, so how has it affected your dating life or
just meeting the other sex basically?
DEHAAN: It really just depends on the person like right after my car accident I met this guy; he saw a
picture of me on my friend’s refrigerator. He was like she is really cute I want to date her, and they knew

Page
19

�what just happened to me. They were like, we better tell him before they meet or whatever. So they
told him and he was like I don’t care. We dated for like two years, it was great. some people we will date
for a little bit and be like this is a little difficult, I’m not use to this. Like if they have to carry me
somewhere or something. It just out of there way or something to do it. I just depends on the person.
But dating for me hasn’t been more difficult. I hear people say it is, I try not to let it affect me. Go about
living my life.
PETRAUSKAS: So basically tell us basically where you are at now? I know your days are complex with
working a new job, going through all you rehabilitation and stuff like that. How is your day structured?
How do you find time for hobbies and friends?
DEHAAN: My weeks are pretty much the same. Monday is the same. Tuesday is pretty much the same.
Mondays I get a massage in the morning, have therapy in the afternoon. Tuesday I will be working all
day. Wednesday I go to therapy, then from therapy to work until 5. Thursday is the same as that. Finally
I will have my Fridays off again so...
PETRAUSKAS: And with therapy, how much do you go to therapy per week or per month?
DEHAAN: Yeah, I go to therapy, right now I’m going 3 days a week for 3 hours a day. It also takes a half
hour to get there and back. So if I go in the afternoon it takes up my whole day pretty much. And when I
am at home, I spend my nights relaxing, hanging out withfriends, or doing those type of things. In my
free time and on my weekends I spend a lot of my free time doing therapy. I have a standing chair I’m
constantly in because I don’t like sitting in this chair all the time, so I will stand at the counter there and
sit on my lap top or watch tv or whatever. I have a bike downstairs that I ride every now and then. A lot
of my time is doing therapy and relaxing and hanging out with my friends.
FELICE: What are you looking to do with your future?
DEHAAN: That’s a dumb question, I don’t know. My future...l’d like to travel all over, get married
someday, and have kids.
LAJDZIAK: So you enjoy going to Russia and like...
DEHAAN: Yeah, I enjoy going there sometimes.
LAJDZIAK: Did you feel that Russia was way different then here?
DEHAAN: The first trip there I screamed bloody murder to come home. I was not going to stay there. No
way. No way. Nobody spoke English, I was sick because they gave me a spinal tap, I couldn’t get out of
bed for four days, I was so sick. I just wanted to come home. It was just crazy.
LAJDZIAK: Was the food different there?
DEHAAN: It was disgusting. And they yell at you if you don’t eat it so we would flushed it down the
toilet.

Page
20

�LAJDZIAK: I had class with him. We were talking about different free states and stuff. They were saying
that Russia like not free also. Did you notice that among the people?
DEHAAN: People are like strait faced, they do not smile. You could tell we were American because we
smiled. They don’t like Americans. There was a McDonalds there, if was so nice for us because we would
go there like every other day, because that was good to us and there food was so gross. We would pack
a full suitcase full of food to eat because we didn’t eat any of theirs.
LAJDZIAK: How about the people at the...
DEHAAN: The clinic where we were so nice. Like you have to get to know them. After a couple times of
me going there, the nurse would run up to me and give me a kiss on the cheek. They were excited to see
you again. They really are caring people.
LAJDZIAK: Does people from all over go there too?
DEHAAN: Yeah. A lot of Greeks go there because their government pays for them to go there actually.
PETRAUSKAS: So I know you were talking about what you enjoy eating. How has your diet changed and
what kind of stuff do you have to do to regulate your diet?
DEHAAN: If I were to gain a lot of weight, this would be a lot harder. Transferring and stuff, I probably
wouldn’t be able to do it. lucky enough I can eat almost anything I want and not gain weight. Now, I
don’t eat fast food or anything, I try to stay healthy.
PETRAUSKAS: What kind of health foods do you eat?
DEHAAN: Chicken.
PETRAUSKAS: Would chicken be your favorite?
DEHAAN: Probably one of my favorites yeah. I eat chicken every day, Pasta. Good protein foods.
FELICE: Do you cook?
DEHAAN: No. I microwave cook, that’s about it.
PETRAUSKAS: So you’re an awesome cook then?
DEHAAN: Yes. My mom is an awesome cook. Luckily I still live at home.
LAJDZIAK: I miss home I’ll tell you that. Home cooked meals are nice.
PETRAUSKAS: So I guess to try to wrap this up, maybe words of kind of wisdom or just basically kind of
wrap it up give a sentence, a little blurb, what things you would like maybe changed to make things
easier in your life, like stuff that is more handicap accessible or advice for someone in your situations to
help better themselves and to take them to the next level to keep them...

Page
21

�LAJDZIAK: Well inform people how you would like to be treated or how to approach you and things like
that. DEHAAN: ok. That’s a lot, I’ll try to remember everything you said. thing that I would like changed is
when going places, if they had a button to push and the door would open. Me and doors are not friends.
I cannot open them half the time. So that is not fun. That’s my biggest thing. I’m always nervous to go
places by myself like a restaurant or something. If I meeting someone, I will usually wait for them to get
the door for me because I can’t get doors. So that would be wonderful if places had a button to push to
make the door open everywhere. The way I want to be treated is just like everyone else. Don’t look at
the wheelchair, like obviously you’re going to see the wheel chair, try to go past it. Get to know me for
me, because I am still a normal person. I like to have fun and I’m outgoing. Yeah. My advice would be,
try to stay positive. That is what has got me through everything. I never went through depression like
most people do with a tragic injury or something. And what remind me to keep going every day is just
somebody has it worse than me. I got to therapy with people who can’t move their arms and can only
move their neck. One guy can’t even talk because his injury is so bad. People have it worse then you. For
sure.
PETRAUSKAS: Airight. We would like to thank you for giving us the chance to interview you.
DEHAAN: You’re welcome.
PETRAUSKAS: it was a pleasure for sure.
LAJDZIAK: It was really nice meeting you.
DEHAAN: Yeah, thanks.
LAJDZIAK: I’m interested in that car.
DEHAAN: We can go look at it if you want.
END OF INTERVIEW

Page
22

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="25897">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6a50ff8394af844c4ef4d83ff361c096.mp3</src>
        <authentication>89ec3be9c33451f0047aa8260bc12152</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="20">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432109">
                  <text>Speaking Out: Western Michigan Civil Rights Oral Histories</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432110">
                  <text>Civil rights--Michigan--History</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765907">
                  <text>Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765908">
                  <text>Oral histories</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765909">
                  <text>African Americans--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765910">
                  <text>Gays--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765911">
                  <text>Lesbians--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765912">
                  <text>Bisexual people--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765913">
                  <text>Transgender people--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765914">
                  <text>Veterans--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765915">
                  <text>Women--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765916">
                  <text>People with disabilities--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765917">
                  <text>Muslims--United States--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765918">
                  <text>Hispanic Americans--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765919">
                  <text>Homophobia</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765920">
                  <text>Discrimination</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765921">
                  <text>Islamophobia</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765922">
                  <text>Stereotypes (Social psychology)--Upper Penninsula (Mich.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432111">
                  <text>Collection of oral history recordings documenting the history of civil rights and social justice advocacy in Western Michigan. The collection was created by faculty and students as a project of the LIB 201 (formerly US 201): "Diversity in the U.S." course from 2011-2012. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432112">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. Brooks College of Interdisciplinary Studies</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432113">
                  <text>Speaking Out: Western Michigan Civil Rights Oral History Project (GV248-01)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432114">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432115">
                  <text>2017-05-02</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432116">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432117">
                  <text>audio/mp3&#13;
application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432118">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432119">
                  <text>Sound&#13;
Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432120">
                  <text>GV248-01</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="432121">
                  <text>1930-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432559">
                <text>GV248-01_DeHaan_Kadi</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432560">
                <text>Kadi DeHaan audio interview and transcript</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432561">
                <text>DeHaan, Kadi</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432562">
                <text>Petrauskas, Kelly</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="432563">
                <text> Lajdziak, Andrew</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="432564">
                <text> Helms, Fred</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="432565">
                <text> Felice, Zachary</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432566">
                <text>Kadi DeHaan was in a car accident when she was in high school. She lost feelings and use of her legs. She has been in rehabilitationand is learning muscle memory. She is in great progress toward her goal of walking again. She discusses her accident and how it has changed her life.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432568">
                <text>Civil rights--Michigan--History</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="432569">
                <text>Women--Personal narratives</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="432570">
                <text>People with disabilities--Personal narratives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432571">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432572">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432573">
                <text>Sound</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="432574">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432575">
                <text>audio/mp3</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="432576">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="432578">
                <text>Speaking Out: Western Michigan Civil Rights Oral History Project</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="440288">
                <text>2012-03-14</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1029798">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="28810" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31378">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/083702f9e400cbb7658068ad190113ec.mp4</src>
        <authentication>1a383ce965436c627b86e1fe1bc71bc2</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="31379">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/2c0062f586254d5a2566250abc7681d2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>faf6e0aa0bd5e1d1ebf56e0a47aa4ee5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="538469">
                    <text>Grand Valley State University
Veterans’ History Project
Merle Delagrange
Vietnam War
1 hour 17 minutes 2 seconds
(00:00:17) Early Life Pt. 1
-Born in Grantwood, Indiana on January 23, 1950
-At the age of ten they moved to Ohio
-He went to high school at Fairview High School in Sherwood, Ohio
-Didn’t graduate
-Met his wife in 1968
(00:01:18) Getting Drafted
-Received a notice for an Army physical
-Got married to his wife on March 8, 1969
-Two months later on May 6, 1969 he had to report for basic training
-Drafted out of Cleveland, Ohio and sent to Fort Campbell, Kentucky
(00:02:07) Early Life Pt. 2
-Father was a farmer until 1962
-After 1962 his father drove concrete trucks for a living
-Mother was a stay at home mom
-He had eight siblings
-Three brothers and five sisters
(00:02:45) Awareness of Vietnam War
-Older friends were being drafted and sent to Vietnam
-Remembers hearing about a major battle on the radio
-Had a feeling that he’d eventually have to go fight in Vietnam
(00:03:30) Basic Training
-Sent to Fort Campbell, Kentucky for basic training
-At first didn’t care for basic training
-Remembers that there was a competitive nature to everything they did
-All drill instructors were Vietnam veterans except for one
-They all worked to instill in the recruits lessons they had learned from Vietnam
-Focused on hand to hand combat and other infantry training
-Qualified with the M60 machine gun and the M14 rifle
-Basic training lasted nine weeks
(00:07:27) Advanced Infantry Training
-Received his orders to report for advanced infantry training (AIT) at the end of basic training
-For two weeks before AIT he spent that time in the hospital due to a broken shin
-Saw critically wounded Vietnam veterans first hand
-Graduated from basic and went to Fort Polk, Louisiana for AIT
-AIT lasted nine weeks
-Completely different environment than basic training
-More relaxed in some aspects, given the weekends off
-All while he was there he knew he’d have to go to Vietnam

�-Remembers Fort Polk having a mock up Vietnamese village for training exercises
-On the last day they were told they would be kept stateside
(00:12:50) Fort Carson
-After AIT he was sent to Fort Carson, Colorado
-He was allowed to live off base with his wife
-Stationed there for five months
-While there he was assigned to th 5th Mechanized Infantry Division
-Went on maneuvers in the Rocky Mountains
-Worked with Vietnam veterans
-They told him that the war was coming to an end
-During the time there his wife got pregnant
-After five months he received his orders for deployment to Vietnam
(00:15:21) Deployment to Vietnam
-After receiving orders for Vietnam he was given thirty days of leave
-Shipped out of the United States from the Oakland Replacement Depot, California
-Arrived in Bien Hoa Air Base on April 28, 1970
-Remembers the first thing he noticed was that Vietnam was hot and it stunk
-Taken by bus from the airport to the Army base in Bien Hoa
-Told that he and the other new soldiers would guard the bunkers
-During that time he was able to write to his wife, but she couldn’t write back
-He didn’t have an actual military address yet
(00:18:14) Camp Evans Pt. 1
-On May 1, 1970 the invasion of Cambodia began
-Some friends of his were sent to aid in the fighting
-On the same day he received his assignment orders
-He had been advised to try and stay out of the 101st Airborne Division
-His assignment was to Delta Company, 1st of the 506th of the 101st Airborne
-Arrived at Camp Evans on May 7, 1970
-Received introductory Vietnam training
-Booby traps, surviving in the field, information about the Vietnamese, animals
(00:20:17) In the Field Pt. 1
-On May 17, 1970 he was flown to Firebase Rakkasan
-Being around Vietnam veterans at Fort Carson had helped prepare him a little bit better
-Veterans in the field still avoided the new guys though
-Safety hazard being around inexperienced soldiers
-Made contact the next day in the field
-Called in an airstrike
-The bombs missed the enemy and almost hit them instead
-He and his unit moved into the NVAs old position on the ridge and set up camp there
-Had 155mm howitzers covering their position
-That night started calling in artillery fire against the NVA near them
-Remembers their position taking a direct hit
-Quick thinking saved his life
-Their unit lost a soldier that night due to friendly fire
(00:28:23) Camp Evans Pt. 2
-He was wounded during the friendly fire incident and was sent back to Camp Evans

�-In the field hospital he saw the severe wounds that other soldiers had sustained during the fight
-He was eventually transferred to another hospital at Phu Bai
-Stayed there temporarily
-After he was released from the hospital he spent a tense night in Phu Bai’s training area
-The next day he caught a convoy that took him back to Camp Evans
-Once there he met with his sergeant and got placed on latrine duty for the time being
(00:33:51) In the Field Pt. 2
-Three days after returning to Camp Evans he returned to the field and joined 3rd Platoon
-Conducted a large amount of ambush operations
-Moved through the jungle towards Firebase Kathryn
-Spent a few days there in June 1970
-Remembers a friend from Alpha Company getting killed
-Had known him and been friends with him since AIT
-On June 20th another friend was killed by a booby trap
-A defecting Viet Cong soldier had placed the booby trap when he “surrendered”
-The unit turned him over to the South Vietnamese Army
-Remembers finding a caved in U.S. bunker position
-Soldiers inside had been killed when the structure collapsed
-Sappers were getting more skilled at infiltrating their positions
-On July 4, 1970 they were called up for a stand down
-Returned to Camp Evans and enjoyed Independence Day there
(00:41:20) The Battle of Firebase Ripcord-Landing
-He and his unit were called up to go and support the forces at Firebase Ripcord
-On July 19 they were flown up to Triple Hill near Firebase Ripcord
-On the morning of July 20 they were flown from Triple Hill to Hill 805
-Dropped into a “hot” (under fire) landing zone
-Had to immediately establish a defensive position
-Operated as an assistant to the M60 machine gunner until the machine gun broke
(00:46:14) The Battle of Firebase Ripcord-Extraction and Rescue by Delta Company
-On July 21 at daybreak the NVA started to bombard their position with mortar fire
-Later in the day there was a brief lull in the fire for them to change positions
-The Vietnamese were able to follow and harass them as they moved
-After a while they were able to move to a landing zone for extraction
-As the medevac helicopters came in the Vietnamese were shooting at those as well
-Delta Company 2nd of 506th came in to extract them (D/1/506)
-Escorted by D/2/506 to an adjacent area for extraction
-By the time they finally touched down at Camp Evans they had suffered severe losses
-He was grateful to be among the survivors
-Had another stand down at Camp Evans starting on July 21 when they returned from Ripcord
-Able to visit their company’s wounded at a rear hospital
(00:55:45) In the Field Pt. 3
-Had to lead his platoon through the Lowlands after losses suffered at Firebase Ripcord
-Led his unit back to Firebase Kathryn
-By October 1970 he had been promoted to sergeant
-It took three weeks for his company to get rebuilt after Ripcord
-Replacements didn’t know how to adjust to being in a unit that went through Ripcord

�-Remembers being at Camp Evans when Firebase Ripcord was evacuated and demolished
-Spent the rest of his tour at either Firebase Kathryn or Firebase Rakkasan
-When the monsoon season began the unit went to Firebase Rakkasan
-After the battle at Ripcord contact with Vietnamese combatants dropped significantly
-Booby traps were still a prominent threat
-Knew that the Viet Cong were still out in the jungle watching every move they made
-Went to Camp Evans for a minor stand down before going on R&amp;R
(01:04:35) R&amp;R
-Towards the end of his tour he went on R&amp;R
-Son had been born on September 26, 1970
-His wife and three month old son were able to meet him in Hawaii
-Remembers that leaving them to return to Vietnam was extremely difficult
-Spent last part of December 1970 and early part of January 1971 in Hawaii on R&amp;R
-Remembers his wife being concerned because he acted disappointed upon holding his son
-Later explained that it was foreign being around something innocent and alive
(01:08:12) End of Deployment and Coming Home
-Last part of his tour was fairly uneventful
-Basic patrolling
-Very little enemy contact
-Left Vietnam out of Cam Ranh Bay
-Arrived in Fort Lewis, Washington
-Got discharged out of the Army there
-Given a bonus at the end of his service due to making the rank of sergeant
-Got home on March 28, 1971
-Met his wife, son, and mom at the Fort Wayne, Indiana airport
-Never faced harassment when he came home
-Knew friends that were abused by protestors
-Flew into both airports at Fort Lewis and Fort Wayne without incident
-Got his old job back as a house painter
(01:12:54) National Guard
-In 1976 he joined the Army National Guard on a whim
-Signed up for a year
-Wound up serving with other Vietnam veterans
-Spent eighteen years in the National Guard
-Retired as a sergeant first class
-Spent twenty years all toll in the Army
-He had been in the 193rd Infantry Company
-Comprised mostly of combat veterans
-Later on became a mess sergeant
-Easier than being in the field after he broke his back in a car accident

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538445">
                <text>Delagrange, Merle (Interview outline and video), 2013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538446">
                <text>Delagrange, Merle</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538447">
                <text>Merle Delagrange was born in 1950 in Grantwood, Indiana. He was newly married and living in Ohio when he was drafted in 1969. After training at Fort Campbell, Kentucky and Fort Polk, Louisiana, he was stationed at Fort Carson, Colorado until he received his orders to be deployed to Vietnam. He arrived in Vietnam on April 28, 1970 and was assigned to D Company, 1st Battalion. 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne Division stationed at Camp Evans.  He was wounded in a friendly fire incident in early May, but soon rejoined the unit and was with them when they were heavily engaged Firebase Ripcord in July and had to be rescued by another unit.  Throughout the rest of his tour he led a platoon on patrols until he left Vietnam and returned home on March 28, 1971. He joined the National Guard in 1976 where he stayed with the 193rd Infantry Company for eighteen years and retired as a sergeant first class.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538448">
                <text>McGregor, Michael (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538450">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538451">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538452">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538453">
                <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538454">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538455">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538456">
                <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538457">
                <text>United States. Army</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538458">
                <text>United States. National Guard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538459">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538460">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538461">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538462">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538467">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538468">
                <text>2013-10-11</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547583">
                <text>DelagrangeM1532V</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567346">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project Collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794821">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796885">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030941">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="55852" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="60231">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/516290f44ebb80dfc21b6a29c5948cc1.mp4</src>
        <authentication>baf485936f0c641671916bc95b304ebc</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="60232">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/90ad3f6ba6322588ccf7e474ef16ac32.pdf</src>
        <authentication>92e5b6335948f8e007e8192f2702e78d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1041793">
                    <text>Living with PFAS
Interviewee: Robert Delaney
Interviewer: Dani DeVasto
Date: August 1, 2025
Dani DeVasto (DD): All right, so I'm Dani DeVasto, and today, August 1st, 2025, I have the pleasure of
chatting with Robert Delaney. Bob, can you, just to get us started, tell me a little bit about where you're
from and where you currently live.
Robert Delaney (RD) (00:00:39): Okay. I'm essentially from Michigan. My family moved quite a few
times, but we were always within the state of Michigan. Most of my relatives were in the upper part of
the lower Peninsula. Right now, we're living outside of outside of Lansing in a small village, small town
called Potterville.
DD (00:00:59): Alright. Thank you. How long have you been in the Lansing area?
RD (00:01:06): Since 1979, I think. On and off we, we were a few years in France and a few years in, or
one year in Colorado. Otherwise Michigan.
DD (00:01:18): Okay. Bob, can you tell me a story about your experience with PFAS or PFAS in your
community?
RD (00:01:26): Sure. the PFAS my discovery of PFAS and what was happening in the state of Michigan
and worldwide dramatically changed my career direction and my personal life really in many ways. And
what happened was I was a project manager of the state's oversight of the US Air Force cleanup at the
former Wurtsmith Air Force base that's up in Oscoda, Michigan. And it was a SAC base. In other words, it
had the bombers that carried the nuclear weapons that were, well, the strategic bombers to protect us
from nuclear war. They were a deterrent. Anyway, that that base closed in, I think it was 93, well, 95
might have been official year. And it was therefore part of the cleanup program for these major sites, it
happened to be a Superfund site, EPA biggest site's most difficult ones that states weren't able to deal
with on their own.
And so I worked through a program where the Air Force paid for my services to help them follow our
state laws as they cleaned up the project. And so during that time I oversaw the different technical
consultants and all the, the grant work and all that. And, and handled the negotiations with the Air Force
on this cleanup, well we were at the point where we had conquered, the Air Force had cleaned up, or
we had a remedy in place for all what we consider the traditional contaminants, the chlorinated from
the metals and oils and gasoline, that kind of stuff. We had, we've gone through virtually every site got
have remedy in place. And I was starting to think about I need another, something else to work on. And I
was praying in church one day and I said, God, I'd like to do something where I, I've never really used my
intellect.
This has been too easy. And and so I just, before I retired, I'd like to do something that really challenged
me. Well, little did I know that within a month I would be down and at a conference and I would learn
about PFAS chemicals, the firefighting foams the Air Force had well, the DOD had a, a session where
they came in and told us about chemicals that were on the horizon of as potential problems. And it just
so happened that while I was at that conference, my consultant calls me from Wurtsmith Air Force Base,
and he says to me, we have this soil at at fire training area where we had been arguing with the Air

�Force for years about the cleanup there. And they finally agreed to do what we told 'em they needed to
do. And he calls and he says, Hey, they dug down in here 'cause they were installing the remedy.
And he says There's a black soil horizon two foot down here. And that nobody told us, nobody knew
anything about it. So that would change the potential for the effectiveness of the re remedy as is. And I
said, okay, well grab three samples of this soil and send them to a lab and see if you can and analyze 'em
for absolutely everything. 'cause We didn't know what they poured out there. And I said, and while
you're at it, see if you can find a lab that can analyze for PFOA and PFOS. And so he said, so he found
one in California and we sent it out to them. And it comes back with loaded with PFOS and PFOA,
especially PFOS. 'cause It's a, it was a firefighting foam. And and I was surprised because they're
essentially soaps, that's what they're used a lot as a soap.
So I'm thinking they're, they should be all swept away outta that soil. And I won't get into the technical
reason why they weren't, but they weren't all, there was a lot of 'em in that, those soil. So, so I said, well
sample the groundwater. And then and then from this training I had gotten, I realized that there were all
kinds of potential sources across the base. And so we started sampling across the base, all the surface
waters soils. And every, absolutely every single sample came back with PFAS in it. Every one. I had never
seen anything like it. And this is like four or five square miles of, of area that we're sampling and we're
finding it everywhere. And we finally found one well, that didn't have any PFAS in it.
DD (00:06:36): And did you decide to sample or test for it because of the conference? Or had you
already started hearing about it before that conference?
RD (00:06:43): I, I went back through my records and I had one message in 2008, two years earlier from
a toxicologist that said you guys might think about PFOS or PFOA, you know this is something on the
horizon. That was one of our lead toxicologists, but it wasn't on any of the stuff we worked on or knew
and had no idea what it was. And at that point in time, there wasn't much literature even on it. And so I
was shocked to find that we had, and I think we even mentioned it to the Air Force at the time, but I, it
was just such a random thing. I totally slipped my mind. So it was because of that conference and just
the uniqueness of the, the situation that we sampled for it.
DD (00:07:26): And was it hard to find a lab at that time to test for it? Or was that not,
RD (00:07:30): Well, I don't know. 'cause My tech, my my consultant does all the hard work. I just do
the, you do this, you do that, and then he goes, do the hard, the hard work.
DD (00:07:40): I see. Okay.
RD (00:07:41): But yeah, it was, it was actually difficult because like, we went out the next year and
sampled fish, and the only place that would analyze fish flesh was in Canada. So we had the whole cross
border thing, and we had to figure out how to send a sample up there and stuff like that. So yeah.
People weren't doing it. It was unusual. 'cause You know, there was no regulatory reason to sample for
it.
DD (00:08:06): Sure. So you started sampling and looking for it and finding it everywhere, except where
you said one well,

�RD (00:08:14): One, well, eventually we would find some other wells, you know? Yeah. That's just forest
upgradient of the, of the Wurtsmith. So there, forest doesn't produce any PFAS. So it was yeah, it all
came from, so it started at the base boundary, basically.
DD (00:08:32): And what then?
RD (00:08:34): Well this, the thing that really changed the direction was that my I went, I didn't know. I
knew that these chemicals by this point were indestructible, essentially indestructible. And they also
were ubiquitous. And so I went to our, went to the toxicologist in our department, the one that usually
worked with me and asked him, can you come up with some criteria? Because that's how we operate.
Something needs to have a criteria or some reason for you to try and regulate it. So he did a back of the
envelope calculation, and he came up with a hundred parts per trillion as the cleanup, potential cleanup
standard for PFOA and 60 parts per trillion for PFOS. Now, those words, those numbers, those words
don't mean anything to anybody. But to me, in my line of work, if a contaminant was around a part per
billion, which is a, an order of magni-, I don't wanna get into that too technical.
But anyway, that's a lot, maybe a hundred times or a thousand times what we were eventually looking
at for PFOS and PFOA as far as the criteria. So like, it's a thousand times maybe, or a hundred times
higher. If I saw a chemical that was that bad, I thought, this is a really bad chemical. It's really dangerous.
Then you back down into the parts per trillion. Well, there's only a few things that we worry about, you
know, dioxins and mercury that we look at at that level. So here's a chemical that is on the level of a
dioxin or mercury in people's systems. So that was pretty shocking. And then the kind of the weirdest
other coincidence, there's a lot of weird coincidences. My son, we'd been told that they thought he was
on the spectrum having Asperger's, and because of some of his and now he's, if he is, he's super high
functioning.
So, and I'm waiting until he becomes a billionaire, but he hasn't yet &lt;laugh&gt; Anyway. He so we my wife,
you know, she's concerned and she knows that I want technical information. I do not want what some
talking head says or whatever. I wanna understand something at a more base level. And so I started
researching autism and what, how the brain worked and, and a lot of the things that go on, and it came
to the realization that it was rising. And it's been rising since. Well, we know since 2000. So it's the last
25 years, it's gone up every year, the rate, and as I read about where autism was showing up, that, you
know, I started realizing, okay, it's showing up in various areas in various subpopulations of the country
at the same time, because my consultant had come to me and said, or my toxicologist had said, this
contaminant is like super, super dangerous.
And I said, okay, I've gotta go back to the military. We all think that we're almost done cleaning up
Wurtsmith. Tens of millions of dollars have been spent, you know, 20 years or more have been spent on
cleaning this place up. And I'm gonna have to go back and tell them that this is, we're just starting all
over from scratch. So I didn't want to go to them. And &lt;laugh&gt;, I, I always joke, I always saw toxicologists
as witch doctors. You know, when you want a criteria, they take some bones in the back room, throw
'em out on the floor, come up with a number and come out and tell you what that number is. And I'm a
geologist, so I just follow whatever the toxicologist says. I had faith that they knew what they were
doing. I'm just joking about the &lt;laugh&gt;, about them being witch doctors.
But anyway, I decided, I want to know for sure if I, this is a dangerous chemical. Is this dangerous
enough to go try and fight the Air Force? 'cause You, you know, you fight the Air Force, it's not a fair
fight. So you had take it on with some, some intelligence. So I started doing a research on the toxicology
of of PFOS and PFOA and the epidemiology. Where, where did it show up? What populations had higher
concentrations? So as I'm reading these two sets of things, they're mirroring up. Like, autism was higher

�in Minnesota. Well, who had the first widespread known PFOS contamination? It was Minnesota. And
it's more common among rich people. Well, who gets new cars and new stuff, and it comes off
electronics and stuff. Well, your carpets where they're covered in PFOS, your cookware, your fancy
clothing, your floss, it's, and so the things that wealthy people did expose them more to PFOS than what
the regular people did, you know?
You go to Goodwill, that stuff's been washed outta that clothing by that time. You get it. And we don't
change your carpeting probably as much. So anyway, then like, autism was higher among the military.
Well, I already knew the military was drinking this stuff all over the place. Autism is higher in, along
expressways within 300 feet of an expressway, or I think, no, 300 yards. I don't remember exactly. But if
you look at where, where contamination non-point source contamination is, it's a lot of times along
major freeways and stuff like that, because it's in diesel. There’s five systems in a, in a, in a diesel truck
that de-gas. And, a lot of those fluids have PFOS in 'em. PFAS. So anyway, I'm getting, down rabbit holes.
But, so anyway, I started thinking, well, maybe this is why autism's going up, because the use of this
stuff has been going up dramatically through all this time.
So I, I, there's, there's research being done on that now, but you know how it, is cause and effect, very
hard to prove. So anyway, I just, for me, when I thought, oh my gosh. And I had, I was bouncing this off
another one of our geniuses at the state, and I'm not kidding, he's a genius. And we were thinking, well,
yeah, it's seemingly like this is the case. So anyway, I felt like literally I felt like I was standing at the edge
of the abyss looking in that we were poisoning ourselves. And the more you read about diseases on the
rise, the more you realize we're poisoning ourselves. And so to make a very long story short, &lt;laugh&gt;, I
haven't made it short. But anyway that changed the, my motivation level to where I became super
motivated that I had to do something about it. And it was not just deal with Air Force, but this was a, a
reality that was way bigger than just the Air Force. And the Air Force and DOD actually proved to be a
catalyst for people becoming aware of PFAS and, and the dangers. So it was really strategic. I was
strategically placed because I was negotiating with the upper management of DOD on their
environmental issues. And they were in a position to actually make a difference with our understanding
of it and, and doing something about it.
DD (00:16:59): Can you say more about how you, through DOD, were able to be a catalyst?
RD (00:17:07): Sure.
DD (00:17:07): From what you could see?
RD (00:17:08): Okay. Well so, so many backstories. So anyway, I advised my management of, of this, at
the end of 2010. I did a big slideshow, brought the toxicologists in and, and leaders of our division. And
we went through all this. And then when this, and, and those were old time environmental leaders that
were in that meeting, and they knew exactly what to do. 'cause They had already done the dioxins and
the mercury and the variety of lead. And, and so they'd already gone through all this. And they
recognized instantly the challenge that was there before us and what needed to be done. And so they
set up immediate work group to work on on the toxicity and what we should be doing about these
things. And we had some ideas. They were gonna test all the waters each year.
The state tests a certain number of, of streams. So we were gonna do all this. And, and so there was, we,
we started up gung-ho and then the Snyder administration came in and they stopped what the division
and the department was doing. And and, and what they told what, I came back through the, through the
grapevine. 'cause We asked our, our chairman chairperson of the group, why aren't we doing anything?
Why aren't all these things we were supposed to do, we're not doing? And they said, well, the Snyder

�administration had told our management is that if our management, DEQ's management, had made one
more problem for business that we would be put outta business. And so obviously PFAS is a huge, huge
problem for business. And not necessarily always because of their own fault. I mean, they didn't know,
most of 'em didn't know. A few knew.
So, so that kind of killed what was going on with the state, you know? Not until Rockford broke. Did, did
anything happen with regard to PFOS, PFAS. But I was on these national committees working with the
Department of Defense with EPA and with all the other states. And there I had carte blanche. My, I think
my intermediate management said, yeah, you can go to any conference you want. You can speak to
anything. They didn't say this to me personally, but every time I asked for, can I go do this, can I do that?
They said, yeah. And so I went out and I would just tell the story of Wurtsmith, you know, and what was
happening there. I didn't get into the toxicology or what I thought, you know, how bad it was or
anything that, but and I, I talked to, well, in 2012, it was in Salt Lake City.
RD (00:20:03): I told, told the defense department, they asked me to talk about contracting. And I said,
well, you got a problem with your contracting. Because they were going to a method where you pay
somebody to clean up a whole site and whatever was on that site, they were gonna clean it up. And they
had to give you a price up front. The contractors had to say, alright, this is how much we're gonna do to
clean this up. I said, you, you, yeah, you, there's a couple of problems with that. But anyway, they're
gonna clean this up, but they don't know about PFAS or PFOS. And when the regulators come and say,
Hey, you've got a problem, then there's no way they're going to have accounted for that in their costs.
There's no way. 'cause It's about impossible to get rid of. It's terribly costly. So I said, so this is the
demon in the closet, PFOS, PFAS, it's going to screw up your relationships, your, your contracting.
RD (00:20:59): And it was from that point forward that I, I just started building, you know, building
coalitions or you know, network of people that we were all concerned about it. And we, I, I you know,
did issue papers for ASTSWMO, Association of State Waste and Manage Waste Management Operators.
So it's a state organization that works with all the different states. That's where I was on the
committees. Well, one of the places I was on the National committees was them. And so I would just go
and I would just tell the story and you know, and find labs that I could work with and just people all
over. And I got relationships with the media so I could feed the, you know, like InsideEPA from
Washington would call me all the time to ask me what was going on with PFAS, PFOA. And so I was able
to influence the nation and then within EGLE, or now called EGLE. But it was the Department of
Environmental Quality at the time within that group, you know, all those peons, we all really cared
about the people and the environment. And so, you know, word got out amongst us. And so when the
Rockford thing broke, there were people that were already, were already knowledgeable about what
was going on.
DD (00:22:23): So you had initially been worried that bringing that information to the DOD about, Hey,
we just finished cleaning up, but I just found this new thing that you need to think about. You were
concerned. But it sounds like they, they kind of went with it, or No? How did they receive that
information?
RD (00:22:48): Well, it's the federal government. So &lt;laugh&gt;, what up here starts out as a shout, do this.
And what actually gets at the bottom is two different things. Like they, the people at the bottom have
no idea what's going on. You know, what the management really wants. And the people at the bottom
can be shouting, and it gets muffled by the time it gets to the top. So, so there was this weird, I, because
I was in acting at both levels, I could see the dynamic. So the person that was in charge of, at Wurtsmith,

�he was anti-environmental. Anything environmental was bad in his worldview. And so they would do,
they were doing nothing. And I knew they would do nothing. But what happened was we we went out
and sampled the fish, like I mentioned, well, we sampled them in the AuSable River. And when we
sampled in the AuSable River, the day that the data came back from the labs, this Canadian, this
Canadian lab, the health department made an or, an order do not eat the fish in the AuSable River.
Okay. So that had political resonance. Yeah. Is that right? All the way up to Washington. Suddenly
Washington had a big PR crisis on their hands. And so they brought in outside people to deal with the
situation and stuff. And so there was actually immediate action to control the contamination off that fire
training area. And they built really the first DOD treatment system for PFOS or PFAS, anywhere that they
had. and so, it was, so it just then, you know, just more and more information coming out, more of the
waters are impacted people's drinking water's impacted, the on base water system was impacted. Uh,
they, it became a political thing for both our state, you know, the governor's office and for DOD. And so
that's why there was movement down at the bottom. There would never have been movement based,
you know, from the, the local, local group. And so that's what I meant when it came to negotiating with
those people. They, they, they are a law unto themselves at times when it comes to, what the president
say. Well, I didn't hear it. You know? And, and so there's a kind of a weird dynamic, politically with the
DOD.
DD (00:25:43): Sure. And then you said too, that at that time, under Governor Snyder's administration,
the state was also not pursuing...
RD (00:25:55): Well, let's see...Well Snyder didn't come along until, well, he came along around. Yeah,
that's true. He we were working on it. And, and Snyder administration, you know, they weren't stopping
us from like we couldn't create criteria, or we couldn't, you know, start enforcing against anybody else.
But they didn't care what we did to DOD essentially. So we were out pushing DOD, and and they were
under Superfund. So Superfund doesn't necessarily need our criteria. Fortunately we didn't get surface
water criteria long before we got a drinking water criteria. So we were, we were pushing that at 'em.
'cause They had a surface water, Because the treatment plants, they could regulate them under a
different set of laws than what we were operating. Anyway, it was all lots of maneuvering. It was like I
had a, when I wanted an intellectual challenge, that was it. I mean, they had to understand law
toxicology, epidemiology to be able to talk to all these people. So,
DD (00:27:04): Yeah. Can you tell me about the Delaney paper? I heard you wrote a paper.
RD (00:27:12): Yeah. Myself and Richard DeGrandchamp professor out at Colorado University of
Colorado. And that has another crazy backstory. But I, my, so I knew that PFOS what PFAS was a
problem. 'cause My toxicologist had given me those criteria, and I'd started doing my own research.
Okay. But my, my toxicologist was swamped. They were re-writing criteria and doing all kinds of things,
and he just said, I, I can't support you. And the weirdest thing happened, another weird coincidence, but
one day, one of the unit chiefs from the Superfund section comes over to me with a thing that had come
across the fax machine. Somebody had done one of those, grab a fax numbers from all governmental
offices and fax out an advertisement. And what it was, was a this toxicologist Richard DeGrandchamp
was advertising, and they did, he did epidemiological and toxicological not studies, but research and
what he did a lot was going, going to court as expert witnesses.
So anyway, this, he was doing it on PCBs, and I think dioxins those two things. And she, so she brings it
over to me, this unit chief, and says, well, you know, you might, you might be interested in this. And and
so I say, oh, yeah, it sounds like it might be something interesting. Maybe this person can do some work

�on PFAS. So I told my contractor, contact this contractor and subcontract him so we can, we can get to
his expertise. And so we got him, and I remember meeting him at the airport, and he was just a, he was
a classic professor type, corduroy coat, hat. And it was just all, it was just classic Indiana Jones. I kind of,
all I thought of at the time. So he shows up and brilliant, brilliant man. And I have funny stories about
him, if you ever want to hear any &lt;laugh&gt;. But he's a, he's a brilliant man and conscientious. And so I
told him we, I got this problem. I got this PFAS stuff in the groundwater and the soils up at Wurtsmith.
And I don't know if it's really dangerous or not. I didn't tell him that. I suspected it was super dangerous,
that I had been doing the research. And and very much convinced that this was a, a very, very dangerous
chemical. So I just say, will you go out, do the research, come back and advise me on what we should be
doing about this? So he comes back to me and he tells me that this is really, really bad stuff. And he said,
the studies in, West Virginia, Ohio area are, the gold standard for studies. You can't do a better study
than this. And they say that this stuff is really dangerous, and, you know, it's almost better stuff than
what the cigarette industry or the cigarettes were, you know, is that it was really good, good data and
good information. So I say, okay, well, well, anyway, so that gave me direction on how to go with
pursuing the, the military. But we had a new director come in. And the new director, it was funny, he,
this is under Snyder, so this new director comes in, and he really wasn't, and he wasn't, didn't know
much about environment. He was quite honest. He didn't know about, the environment. Uh, this is Dan
Wyant. And he said he wanted to meet all of his 3000 employees, I think that was, so he had these
meetings where you got to stand up and you had five minutes or something like that to tell him what
you thought he should be working on or any, you could tell him anything. And he said, you could even
tell him he didn't know what he was doing. So when it came my turn, I think I was the only state
employee to do this, but I stood up and said, you don't know what you're doing. And then I launched
into PFAS and PFOA See, in 2009 the European Union had already begun to regulate this stuff. And my
director had never even heard of it. So this is 2011. My director hasn't heard of this, these chemicals,
and yet they're that critical.
Maybe it was 2012, I can't remember exactly what the date was. So I say to him, I'm gonna write you a
report. And so I got myself and Richard DeGrandchamp wrote the, I think it was 95 pages. There's 96
page report on PFAS and PFOA, talking about the dangers, its distribution, its history. And one chapter,
which turned out to be particularly inspired was what, what can the department do to address this? So
it was, it was pretty, it was actually pretty funny. 'cause I always thought, well, I heard that. Don't bring a
problem to your boss unless you got a solution. So this was a throw in, throw, throw in a chapter. I was
just off the top of my head stuff, well, this is what we could do. We do this, we could do this, you know,
or we should do. I never said we could. I said, we should do this. You know? And later that would be the
kind of outline of what the state did. So it was kind of funny 'cause it was just off the top of my head to
try and not, not do a faux pas and bring a problem without a solution.
DD (00:33:21): I was impressed by that chapter or that part of the paper when I was reading through it. I
was like, oh, they actually offered, like, some steps forward and some like very reasonable things. Like
next steps. So I was very impressed when I read that part of it.
RD (00:33:38): Yeah. That was the, that was the easiest part to read, write. 'cause I didn't have to really
think hard. It just &lt;laugh&gt;. It just flowed. So it was funny.
DD (00:33:45): And how, so once you had that paper written, how was it received?
RD (00:33:50): Well I mean, it was received well, I, I had I had a good friend that was advising the, the
director. And he was on, he was one of the, he and myself and the director had all met together. He, he

�myself and another fellow that I have a lot of respect for was there as well. I can't remember his name.
But anyway, they they received it well. The director was fairly interested in the autism thing. I hadn't
mentioned autism, but he had ridden with my student assistant somewhere. And my student assistant
was talking to him about autism and the link. I really didn't wanna talk about that 'cause I was a
geologist. And this autism thing is just my, my my thing. I put it out on the web because I wanted to
provoke conversation. So so anyway I didn't find out until later, but they distributed about 20 copies to
other leaders in the, in the department. So, but that was in 2012. And it got lost after that.
DD (00:34:58): Mm. Why do you think?
RD (00:35:02): Well, it was, it was huge. And I mean, to me, it was like, to me, it radically changed my
whole view of what we'd been doing. I thought that America had been making advances on
contaminants that we had stopped putting out, you know, TSCA, RCRA ,all designed to stop us from
doing this. And then I realized at that time that those, those were mirages, those were not doing,
protecting us, that we were creating new problems. 'cause I thought, oh, we've stopped making new
problems, and so suddenly here's a problem that is so huge that it's mind boggling trying to address it.
And mostly, like a lot of reasons the DOD went and did some pretty positive things is they didn't realize
how big it was and how expensive it was going to be. When it started dawning on them, how incredibly
expensive and difficult this was. That's when you finally got push back at the top levels. Before that they
were, they're most of the people, what, contrary to everybody's opinion nowadays, are really decent
human beings. I mean, they're Americans. They're not like, they're not crazy people. They're Americans.
They are honestly decent human beings. And yes, there are some bad ones up there, but wherever
there's power or money, there will be bad people. You can't help that. But there were a lot of great
people out there, and they wanted, like, one of the things I said in that 2012 meeting was I said, look,
you guys have the young people in your ranks, the people that are gonna be having babies. It is critical
for you to go out and find out and, and I didn't do it quite this dramatically, but it is critical for you to go
out and find out if your people are drinking this water. So they literally went all around the globe and
sampled every water supply that they had at their bases. And that becomes key at what happens in
Rockford. And, and so if we get to Rockford, I'll tell you how, that became a key thing that made
Rockford happen.
DD (00:37:17): Can you just clarify one point, you said you put it out on the web, was that the autism
information. Like did you have your own like, website or what?
RD (00:37:27): The other person that I was working with is I'll just say Mark for right now 'cause I know if
he wants his name out there. But Mark had a, a website for his business. And so we quick put it onto his
business website, and for awhile it was the number one you put in PFAS and autism, it would be the
number one paper that popped up. But, now, I don't know if you'd ever find it again, but still out there I
think.
DD (00:37:56): Wow. Thanks for that clarification. Okay. So how, so you're, you know, you're, sounds
like you're working nationally. You're kind of, you've got kind of that perhaps unofficial carte blanche to
do these conferences. Meanwhile, the state at some points is not really embracing this...
RD (00:38:18): I gotta say like the health department was, and the surface water people, they were still
going out and sampling fish. And they're still sampling the surface waters. So there was work being done
at all the Defense department sites. So we're gathering information and there's this little pool of

�information that's growing. But yeah, the department itself is, it's you know, we'd rather sweep this one
under the rug.
DD (00:38:43): So then how did you get connected in, or how did this get connected in with Rockford?
RD (00:38:52): Oh, well, that is a, that I, I, like I mentioned in 2012, I had spoken, there was both, it was
an Air force and Army conference, environmental conference with a small, um or they called it a
summit. And I gave my little spiel and I told them, you guys, you know, you got these young people, you
gotta go out and sample your water to make sure they're not drinking this stuff. So they literally, they
didn't, they didn't check with me, but they went ahead and did that. And so they're sampling all around
the globe. And that's where you, you find that suddenly the military has all these sites. And they were
always mad and rightfully so. 'cause Everybody was saying, oh, the military's so horrible. They've
contaminated everything. Well, the only difference was they sampled for it, nobody else did. So that,
you know, they were really doing a great thing. Opening up the reality that this is super widespread
problem. But, you know, they got whacked for, for doing it. But one of the last rounds they did were all
these low risk sites. And it so happened that in Rockford there was a a facility that they had purchased,
and its only function was to provide a place for the band to practice. Okay. And they never operated
anything there. It was and they hadn't bought it that long ago. Well, when they sampled that water, it
came back highly contaminated with PFOS, PFAS. And so they started investigating, you know, how is
this possible? We know we didn't do this. You know, they reported it to the EGLE, the DEQ, whatever
they were called then. And, and it, so that pointed back to, well, they were, they did weird things. The
department, the, the people, first of all, the people that were responsible for doing the sampling, they,
we don't know why, but they sampled down gradient instead of upgrade, or No, they sample, what did
they do? They sampled either cross gradient or something to the groundwater flow. And then they
didn't detect anything. And so they were trying to write it off as something, I don't know what, you
know, nobody knows the full story of what was going going on with them. But anyway, they got called
out eventually. 'cause They sampled, the, I don't know how it got tied back to the, the tannery, but it
just, the investigation, I guess eventually got it back to the tannery. And, so it was because of that,
because they found this high levels of contamination from a DOD site. And they know they hadn't done
it that eventually was found out it was the tannery.
And, and the other side note is that there's a friend, Janice, that had called me from, in 2000, I think it
was 2011, that's when the emails are from, she called me and was talking to me about, contamination at
the tannery. And I told her at the time, the thing that I said, she was worried about heavy metals
because in tanning they used heavy metals. But, I said, wait, at the time, I said, well, you should have,
you should be checking into PFAS. Because I had lived in Rockford, I knew about the tannery, and I knew
they used Scotchgard on, on those shoes. And so, and the water tasted horrible. So &lt;laugh&gt;. Anyway, I
told Janice, you guys need to be looking into the PFAS and see if they used Scotchgard and stuff. And so
as Janice went through all the, all the files, from the tannery, she found evidence that they were using
Scotchgard. And so, they were working from that end of things, from the public, trying to bring EPA in
and, and various other things. You probably know Janice's story better than I do now. But, so those,
those were the two things that were brought it together, DOD's discovery and, and that that group,
fighting to have the place, that cleaned up properly.
DD (00:43:32): And you knew that Scotchgard at that point had PFAS in it.
RD (00:43:36): Yeah. In fact, in all my slideshows, when I talk about what, what's it in, Scotchgard is
mentioned.

�DD (00:43:42): Wow. That seems like two really lucky breaks in terms of putting that together. Right?
Like these low risk band practice site, and, you know, Janice happens to contact you. Those are really
tenuous threads
RD (00:44:03): There are and as I've mentioned to you I have had a couple of supernatural experiences
in my life. And this in total felt like one string of miracles. I mean, and I know I'm a scientist. Okay. I'm,
I'm a I'm a skeptical personality type, and I don't expect anybody to believe it. But to me, the things that
happened literally at, when I was sitting with upper management in our work groups at EGLE, and we
were discussing, you know, we're gonna go out and sample all the water and all the systems in
Michigan, I'm sitting here pinching myself. Like, this is unbelievable. This is like, I can't believe this is like
a miracle. I never, I never thought in the world I could get, I would get them to do anything. You know,
because the of the business angle, and if it hadn't been for Flint, Flint was also critical to what happened
in PFAS because the, the, the governor could no longer look like he was ignoring environmental
problems.
He just didn't, he didn't, couldn't risk that. And so there was no political way of stopping what was going
on. And so yeah, it was just crazy stuff just went on that, you know, when I was looking at that abyss, I
was looking at it from the standpoint of there's a horrendous problem out here, and there is no way in
the world it's ever gonna get addressed because we're going so far away. Even back then towards in the
environment, it was, it was already an obvious thing that we were tired of caring about environmental
things that was causing us problems with jobs or whatever. So I was thinking, there is no way we're
gonna take on this. Like we took on the dioxins and, and the, and the lead and the mercury. And so to
see what happened was, has been just amazing.
DD (00:46:07): It sounds like your whole world became, at least work world became
RD (00:46:10): Yeah.
DD (00:46:11): PFAS
RD (00:46:12): Yeah, I was just thinking this morning, my mom was the second one of the second leading
experts on PFAS in Michigan. 'cause She would sit and listen to me when I ranted on and on about it.
&lt;Laugh&gt; &lt;laugh&gt;. So yeah, it was, it, it became very very dominating in my life.
DD (00:46:29): What what if any concerns do you have about PFAS now moving forward?
RD (00:46:35): Well that, that anti-environmental spirit that has now gripped our nation, a lot of our
nation is PFAS isn't the only environmental problem. We have so many diseases that are arising, not just
autism and a lot of the autoimmune diseases, thyroid disease childhood cancers and diabetes. There are
so many things hitting us all at once. And so it's not because we're all eating at McDonald's or some fast
food place, that's not what's doing it because this is happening in other places around the globe that
they don't have the same cultural behaviors that we do, and the same foods. And yet you'll find autism
raising in you know, China and, and other places that don't, don't do what we do. And so there has to be
an explanation for what's causing these real rates. Not just population trend changes. Like, you know, a
lot of us are getting dementia while we're all getting older. The population get older. You expect
dementia to increase, but you don't expect childhood cancers leukemia or something like that to
increase. They're the same age, you know? So there are environmental things that are impacting us. And
I've already, I've already seen rumblings of the Trump administration lowering the standards on, on

�PFAS. And I don't, I haven't been able to verify this 'cause they just saw it yesterday. But there's even a
move to to allow PFAS contaminated sludges from municipalities to be spread in farmland when they
were trying, the Biden administration just apparently passed something that said, you can't put PFAS
contaminated sludges on land, on farmland. And, you know, there's a, there's a business reason why,
you know, tax and business reason to put that stuff on the land.
RD (00:48:55): And that, again, I don't want to use this as a, a pun or whatever, but that's, that trumps
protecting people's health right now at, at almost every turn. If it's perceived as bad for business, bad
for American economy, real or not real. It is, is under attack. And so I see you know, I &lt;laugh&gt; it's almost
suicidal. If people understood they were killing their children and their grandchildren, then I don't think
this would be happening. Because like I say, I don't know if we can afford to clean up PFAS and stop it
from getting into us, but I do know we cannot afford to poison our children. If you're doing your
economic analysis, then what is the price of our children? What's their worth? So to me, it's mind
boggling where we're at. So Yeah. I'm concerned.
DD (00:50:04): Yeah. Sobering.
RD (00:50:06): Yeah. Yep.
DD (00:50:09): To say the least. Is there anything that you would want to add that we haven't touched
on today or that you would want to go back to and say more about? Anything that's kind of bubbled up
since we've been talking?
RD (00:50:32): You know, the only thing I thought about is like what you're doing and what one of the
things that was remarkable to me about the American system was the power of the media. You know,
for all the garbage that the media puts out, they're also totally instrumental in counteracting the lies and
the nonsense. If you want to know the truth, it's out there. And a lot of why I didn't get touch into what
the media did with regard to helping the story here in Michigan and how they were so instrumental in,
in in getting the, getting public awareness out there and making it impossible for the politicians to
ignore. They were just so critical. And so it was, it was, it was great to see, you know, we had, we do
have some important political and social things that have helped us. And that's what I'm more, almost
more afraid of losing in this country now, is that with all the pressures that are going on towards I don't
even blame people for being so thoroughly confused about what's true, but, but it is a scary thing.
DD (00:51:53): Do you want to say anything more about media and PFAS and if you have any part of that
story or...?
RD (00:52:02): Well I'll tell you, there was a couple of people and that were critical. Garret Ellison and
oh, drawing a blank on his name. This is a sign of old age. Steve Gruber Steve Gruber, he got me onto his
show. When I broke the story, I think that's probably something I'd like to tell about is the, how, how
Michigan actually became a leader nationally on PFAS and PFOA. And this is another one of those really
crazy stories, but in the, in the Flint situation where they had the drinking water problem with the lead,
and it was, it was caused by a bad decision to change water sources. There was a state employee that
came to management and said, look at if we switch this water source from from Detroit to, or no, from
whatever they were using in Flint to the Detroit water system, what's gonna happen is lead is gonna
leach into the water. He told him, flat out, it's gonna be in everybody's water. That person was actually
indicted by the Attorney General of Michigan, Bill Schuette. 'cause He, he needs to, he needs to hang or

�not hang that this needs to be hung on him, that this, you did this. But he went after this this employee
that was trying to warn people. And it, it was because his theory, from what I understand, was go after
the little people and they will give you the big, big, big fish, which was John or not was Governor Snyder.
'cause He wanted Governor Snyder's job, basically. I guess. So he goes after all these small fry at the
state and wrecks careers, hurts their lives, their families, all this because he wants to be governor, not
because he wants the truth. So I was driving down the road one day when Rockford had broke. It was
out in the news they'd find, they find the contamination all over the place. And I thought to myself, out
of the blue, well, who knew about this first? Me. They're gonna go after me. And so I so I called my
friend who's an attorney, and I say, Hey, can I meet with you?
And we get together and I explain the situation. I explain why I'm concerned that I will be the next victim
of this, this political war. And he takes my report home. 'cause I said, look it, I gave this report in 2012
to, to management. And he reads the thing and he comes back and, you know, after he's read it, the guy
could read awfully fast, apparently. Anyway. And, you know, he's just really, he's blown away by it. And
he, and so, so this is the amazing thing, Steve. This was on Wednesday. It turns out that Steve Gruber on
his radio program here in Lansing, a talk radio in the morning. And he was talking on Thursday about
what was happening in Rockford. And he's familiar with the Flint situation. And he says, somebody at
DEQ had to know that this was out there. That this was a problem. And that's where I found out about
the 20 copies that had been spread around. That somebody had read my report that was driving in to
work at the state and they heard Gruber say this. And they call in and say, yeah, I saw this report report
from this DeGrandchamp guy or whatever. And on Friday morning, Gruber is reading my report on the
radio. This is a, I mean, that's how crazy this is. So Wednesday, Thursday, Friday.
DD (00:56:17): Are you hearing this on the radio?
RD (00:56:19): No, I didn't know anything about this. This is, this is this is just, this is what's so funny. So
I, and I don't know how, I don't know how my attorney found out. My attorney found, my attorney
turned out to be friends with Gruber. Okay. So another weird connection. But, so my attorney has this
contact in the attorney general's office. And so he contacts this Attorney general and says, Hey, I got this
guy that knows all about this PFAS stuff, and he's willing to come in and talk to you and give you
everything he's got for immunity. So, well, Sunday or Monday, Sunday I think it is, I, we get back an offer
from the Attorney General's office. And what they offered me was the deal they offer to mobsters, if
you, we will, we will not con not prosecute you if you tell us every bad thing you did and everything, all
your information, and if you hold anything back, we can come after you for that. Okay. So there's
assumption that I did something wrong or bad in this and that. And so I said, I'm not signing that. So my
attorney gets together with some some judges and some other attorneys. We all meet together on
Monday evening and the decision is made that I need to get my story out before the attorney general
comes after me 'cause then there's a, like gag order on you and whatever. And so that's where it comes
out to me that Gruber has been talking about me and &lt;laugh&gt;. And so they set up an interview for
Wednesday morning. So this is within a week. Wednesday morning I go on, I take time off from work,
get it cleared so I can't get me for moonlighting or whatever. I don't know. Anyway, so I go on radio and
we talk for two hours about the report and, and stuff. And you know, other co coworkers or people in
the governor's office driving in listening to Gruber, hear my, what I'm saying on, on the radio about
Yeah, they knew about it in 2012. And you know, this is the report. And, and so many of the questions
you asked that kind of stuff too, was being asked.
RD (00:58:37): And so it was really a tremendous relief to me because I felt like I've got all the, I'm so
concerned about this stuff and I can't get the communication out. And so from there as one person said,

�well, your attorneys made you prosecution proof that nobody can come after you. And but anyways,
really, I knew I didn't really want to do it because, you know, it would be perceived as betrayal to the
department. And, and so my career got, got whacked. But the nice thing about civil services, they can't
fire you for telling the truth. Or they might be able to, but they're not supposed to &lt;laugh&gt;. So I, I knew
they could make my my life miserable, but firing me would've been a, was a huge problem. Yeah. So
they did make it kind of uncomfortable, but other than that, it wasn't bad.
DD (00:59:29): That sounds like a really stressful week-ish.
RD (00:59:33): I was under well on the stress belt too. Because you know, I no longer, well, I know I no
long, I always felt like I was part of a team. And and that of course had been breaking down because of
our division was headed in all the wrong direction. But then it got really bad. So they had one other
person supposed to be spying on me, and all this other junk was going on. So it was stressful. But every
morning I'd get up and I have my quiet time and I, I survived it all. My doctor gave me some pills to keep
my blood pressure down.
DD (01:00:15): And then from that point on was, I know you're saying the department was changing and
like your role changed and things like that. So then was PFAS less a part of your life and your work?
RD (01:00:32): You know what, well, what happened was the Air Force went after me trying to get me
fired. And my division chief, she at one point was trying to get me fired. And and what they were doing
was micromanaging me and they were making it so I couldn't give my, I give instructions to my my
consultants. My consultants wouldn't do anything. And then they put another person that was supposed
to be helping me, but rather was the one that was truly being made the project manager. 'cause They
couldn't really take me off the site. They couldn't make it look like they were punishing me or anything.
So they left me in position, but then took, stripped my abilities to do anything. And wasted my time
basically. But I kept working on the outside on, on the issues, so
DD (01:01:28): Yeah. Are you still working outside? I know you're retired now, but,
RD (01:01:34): Well, I did a lot of volunteer work, but because of family issues I had been pulling away
and just too much stress. So I have pulling away from doing much of anything anymore right now. So,
but I was doing a lot of consulting on the side for, for free. You know, I was just helping out with the
communities and still those kind of things, but I'm pretty tired.
DD (01:02:05): You wanted to use your intellect...
RD (01:02:08): Yeah. &lt;Laugh&gt; I did. Yeah.
DD (01:02:10): Oh my goodness. Okay. I'll ask it again. Is there anything else that you wanna add or go
back to before we wrap up?
RD (01:02:19): There's a lot of wonderful people out there in the world. A lot of great people. I wish
Americans could realize that even the people on the other side are not such bad people. But that's,
that's relates to everything, not just PFAS.
DD (01:02:35): Well, thank you so much, Bob, for taking the time to share your story with me today.

�RD (01:02:40): Oh, it was a pleasure. I haven't thought about it much lately, but it was fun.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="53">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885666">
                  <text>Living with PFAS Interviews</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885667">
                  <text>Devasto, Danielle</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885668">
                  <text>Beginning in 2021, the Living with PFAS interviews were recorded to gather the personal stories of individuals impacted by PFAS contamination. PFAS, or per- and polyflourinated substances, are a large group of human-made chemicals used widely since the 1940s to make coatings and products resistant to heat, oil, stains, grease, and water. They can be found in countless household items, including food packaging, non-stick cookware, stain-resistant furniture, and water-resistant clothing. These chemicals are often called “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily, can move through soils and contaminate drinking water sources, and build up in animals, plants, and people. PFAS have been linked to increased incidences of various cancers, increased cholesterol, decreased fertility, birth defects, kidney and liver disease, and immune system suppression, and thyroid dysfunction. It is estimated that PFAS are in the drinking water of more than 200 million Americans (Andrews &amp; Naidenko, 2020). In Michigan alone, over 280 sites have PFAS contamination exceeding maximum contamination levels for groundwater (MPART, 2024).</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885669">
                  <text>2021</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885670">
                  <text>Living with PFAS (project)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885671">
                  <text>In copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885672">
                  <text>Oral history&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="885673">
                  <text>Personal narrative</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="885674">
                  <text>PFAs (Perfluorinated chemicals)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="885675">
                  <text>Groundwater--Pollution</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885676">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885677">
                  <text>DC-11</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885678">
                  <text>video/mp4</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="885679">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="885680">
                  <text>audio/mp3</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885681">
                  <text>Motion Picture</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="885682">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="885683">
                  <text>Sound</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="885684">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041775">
                <text>PFAS0040</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041776">
                <text>Delaney, Robert</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041777">
                <text>2025-08-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041778">
                <text>Robert Delaney, 2025 (Interview video and transcript)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041779">
                <text>Robert Delaney, a former Michigan Department of Environmental Quality project manager, became one of the first in the state to identify and investigate widespread PFAS contamination. His work at Wurtsmith Air Force Base in Oscoda and later statewide helped bring public, governmental, and national attention to PFAS risks, despite facing political pushback.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041780">
                <text>DeVasto, Danielle (interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041781">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041782">
                <text>Personal narrative</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041783">
                <text>PFAs (Perfluorinated chemicals)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041784">
                <text>Groundwater--Pollution</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041785">
                <text>Living with PFAS (project)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041786">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041787">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041788">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041789">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041790">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041791">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1041792">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="28861" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31467">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/787da269f88be88bf3b8898fc58ef5f0.m4v</src>
        <authentication>08621cc2f04cd9c639092fc76c4c36ee</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="31468">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/fd3582d6cee632a92f294fbe3e33fb09.pdf</src>
        <authentication>87afc4b36db43713979a65872818cb07</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="539783">
                    <text>Grand Valley State University
Veteran’s History Project
Afghanistan and Iraq
Jeff DeLange
Length of Interview (00:21:10)
Background
Born in Grand Rapids, MI; attended Caledonia High School
Father worked at Steelcase and mother was a real estate agent; has two older sisters
First family member to serve in the military
Was called by a recruiter and thought it was a good idea; went into the Army (00:01:05)
Didn’t consider any other branches after being called
Would have considered the Air Force due to their higher quality of life while deployed
Basic training was a lot of work and little sleep (00:02:50)


Very difficult at the beginning, homesick; did basic training in Georgia (3-4 months)



Trained in Fort Benning, Infantry Training



Infantry, 11-Bravo



Had to adapt, no choice



Joined when he was 18, was quiet



Saw plenty of people get in trouble (mostly because of cell phones and cigarettes)



Not too much of a social life; had to be tough



Food was never good
o Every day had the same thing for breakfast: eggs, biscuit and gravy, sausage or
bacon, cereal; had very little time to eat (10 minutes for the last person in line)
o Lunch and dinner would change; half the time it was chicken
o Would drink water, no pop (not recommended)

�Afghanistan/Iraq
Served in Afghanistan March 2006-November 2006; in Iraq November 2007-January 2009
(00:06:15)
Worst feeling was the week before thinking about where he was going; one year of no break
Trip was a 24 hour flight, total; not a good feeling
The weather in Afghanistan (March) was still cool and rainy; stayed in one FOB (base) with no
showers and go every 2-3 weeks to another place eight hours away to take showers


End of May, had to leave the FOB, hotter temperatures



Remembers going on patrols during summer, would up to 100 degrees; had to wear a lot
of gear



End of November (2006), began raining a lot, got to mid 40’s



Iraq in November (2007) was the same way; even snowed one day (00:08:50)



Summer was painful heat

In Afghanistan, had a chow hall, less structured schedule; Iraq had more strict schedule
(00:09:30)


In Iraq, his patrols were scheduled from 4PM-12AM, always missed dinner



Would eat local food sometimes in Iraq, not in Afghanistan

Civilians he met in Iraq were often beggars (00:10:50)


Afghanistan was a less developed country, but didn’t have as many people begging

Never used his gun in Iraq; once in Afghanistan (00:11:40)


Thought they were going home in July (Afghanistan), but was extended another 3
months; before then, went on patrol in Mid-July (10th)



Were going through a mountain valley next to a river before being attacked; went on for
seven days
o Had gone through the area a month before and had been attacked



Lost one of the men there



Was a 10-day mission called Operation Perth

�

Thought they would be going back to America; one week later, stay was extended for
three more months

During combat, have to keep one’s head down and shoot; comrades are counting on you, as you
are counting on them (00:13:15)
Met a lot of friends (his best friend had just been deployed one week before this interview)


Stays in touch with a lot of his friends from the Army

In Afghanistan, didn’t have as much opportunity to contact his family; Iraq wasn’t as difficult,
would call every night


Longer missions during Afghanistan



Remembers calling his father about the extension

Played a lot of cards in Afghanistan, and watched DVDs (00:15:25)


Didn’t want to do too much (especially because of the heat) after patrols, during
preparations, cleaning gear, sleeping



Remembers 4th of July, had basketball courts set up, but didn’t have enough time use any
of them

Afghanistan/Iraq: Re-Deployment (00:16:20)
Re-deployed in November; opened up a FOB called FOB Warrior (Battalion he was in called
Warrior)
His platoon was one of the last to leave; had to teach the new people coming in, patrols
Iraq: JSS (Joint Security Station), turning Iraq over to the Iraqi people
Working with Iraqi National Police and Iraq National Army; showed them what they did
Flown back afterwards, 22-26 hour flight (00:18:05)
Remembers coming home from Afghanistan, had friends he celebrated with
Didn’t have too much difficulty readjusting back to civilian life
Has about 10 friends from the Army he still keeps in touch with
The Army taught him independence, how to work hard, teamwork, how to be adaptable
(00:19:45)

�Doesn’t regret joining the Army; learned and experienced lot, made a lot of great friends; it was
hard, but has no regrets

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539758">
                <text>DeLange, Jeff (Interview outline and video), 2009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539759">
                <text>DeLange, Jeff</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539760">
                <text>Jeff DeLange served in the Army for a total of five years as an infantryman and toured in Afghanistan and Iraq  between 2006 and 2009 where he conducted patrols and later helped with the turnover of operations to the Iraqis.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539761">
                <text>Miller, Hayden (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539762">
                <text> Caledonia High School (Caledonia, Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539764">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539765">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539766">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539767">
                <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539768">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539769">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539770">
                <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539771">
                <text>Iraq War, 2003-2011--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539772">
                <text>United States. Army</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539773">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539774">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539775">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539776">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539781">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539782">
                <text>2009-11-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547629">
                <text>DeLangeJ</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567392">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project Collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794867">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796928">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030987">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="28812" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31380">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/bfee8717107ab8137c7b89b197700106.mp4</src>
        <authentication>79e43f77e701c5edf9da624825eec743</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="31381">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/587dd550edd41e8c5474d86128db401f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>735a9964bb63677d6f38a67f33bf0dd4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="538520">
                    <text>Grand Valley State University
Veterans History Project Interview
Vietnam War
Frank Delfino
1:50:42
Introduction (00:22)








Frank was born in Boston, Massachusetts on January 21, 1949. His parents were Frank
and Dora. He has a younger brother and a much younger sister. His father was a World
War II veteran.
Franks‟ father worked as a construction insulator, and his mother was a hairdresser and a
home maker.
Frank graduated from high school on June 8, 1966.
After graduating, he flunked out of college twice. In those days, everyone was thinking
of how they could get out of going to Vietnam. (02:21)
On his 20th birthday in 1969, Frank was working at the United States Postal Service when
he delivered his own draft notice. (04:50)
He began to train himself by doing push ups and other things to get into better shape
before he went to basic training.
He left for basic training on February 25, 1969 during a blinding snow storm.

Military Training (05:37)













When he had his physical, he remembers people having letters getting themselves out of
service, while others were eliminated from military service due to previous sports injuries
like bad knees, ankles, perforated eardrums and other things.
Frank reported to Fort Jackson, South Carolina after a 26 hour train ride from Boston.
When he arrived, he was sick with an upper respiratory illness and was admitted to the
infirmary. (07:45)
Because of his illness, he was in the infirmary for three weeks.
Frank was with a great group of guys who worked together and did well during basic
training. (09:45)
Looking back on basic, Frank and his group did not have any disciplinary issues. (11:39)
The better they did allowed them to get liberties that were available such as four hours
each Sunday.
One drill sergeant was the army boxing champion and offered to teach boxing lessons for
anyone who wanted them. Frank took him up on it and learned from him.
Basic training lasted 8 weeks. After that, they stayed at Fort Jackson for AIT (Advanced
Infantry Training).
While there, they learned more about the army and weaponry. (13:37)
Most of his instructors in both basic training and AIT had spent time in Vietnam. Much
of the training was geared for Vietnam.
They would be woken up in the middle of the night to perform marches and other things
to get them used to being on the move at short notice.

�



















In AIT they did lots of obstacle courses, rappelling and other physical conditioning that
would prepare them for Vietnam. (15:54)
The training not only built physical confidence for Frank but also mental confidence. He
realized that he could be a leader, which led him to become a squad leader.
While walking through the woods, they would have pop-up targets that they would shoot
at with blank ammunition.
During patrols they would have to cross rivers and streams up to their necks and learn to
hold their rifles and other gear above their heads. (17:45)
AIT lasted for another 8 weeks.
After that, Frank signed up for mortar school. They asked for volunteers to go to mortar
school and then be sent to Korea. Mortar training was also done at Fort Jackson, which
lasted three weeks. Frank and his unit did so well; they broke every training record they
could at mortar school.
On May 10, 1969, the 101st lost a large amount of NCO‟s at Hamburger Hill. That battle
changed the plan to send Frank to Korea. They were instead sent to the NCO training
program at Fort Benning, Georgia and then on to Vietnam. (20:43)
Frank and another man went in and spoke to their captain to protest the decision. They
all ended up at Fort Benning anyway.
After thirty days of leave, Frank reported to Fort Benning on July 20, 1969, the same day
that Neil Armstrong landed on the moon. (22:43)
They were treated very well because they were soon to be non-commissioned officers
and they did not start training until the next day because the instructors wanted them to
all see the moon landing.
There was no yelling or screaming while at NCO school; it was more like an Ivy League
college.
NCO school was enjoyable and Frank learned a lot while there. Most of the exercises
were done in the field, and they had classroom instruction with movies. (25:45)
NCO school lasted twelve weeks; Frank graduated in the upper third of his class on
October 10, 1969.
His dad and brother came down for his graduation and then he was given about a 12-14
day leave. From there, he was assigned to be the training NCO at Fort Riley in charge of
physical training. (27:19)
He was in charge of getting the officers up at 5:30 am and making them run and do other
exercises. He was told by the colonel that he was in charge of physical conditioning of
the men. Frank came up with a training plan that was approved by the commanding
officer and he told Frank that if any of the officers had a problem with him running the
show as a buck sergeant to let him know immediately.
Frank always had the men fall out wearing baseball caps, white shirts, and bloused boots,
but no rank.
Frank stayed there until January, when he was given a month leave at home before he
was sent to Vietnam. (30:10)

Vietnam (30:20)


Frank went from Logan Airport in Boston to [McChord Air Force Base] in New Jersey
straight to Guam and then on to Bien Hoa. He landed at 5:30 am February 8, 1970.

�




















When he got off the plane and went into the receiving building, he saw five or six
hundred men waiting to go home. One of them ran up to Frank, held him up, and yelled
“Look! Fresh meat for Charlie!”.
Frank was scared when he got to Vietnam because he had been watching the whole thing
unfold since 1963 on television and he knew what was going on there. (32:47)
They were processed in and stayed in a transitional barracks for two to three nights.
They took incoming mortars that night and he was put in charge of a section of the wall
on guard duty. The smell of the country was like body odor, fish, and extreme humidity.
He also was in charge of KP duty and he had to pull graves registration, which was going
through the bodies of the dead and checking them in. (34:47)
Frank stayed in the transitional area for three days until they were all brought out to a
staging area, some thirty guys in total. A sergeant came over and told them they were
going to the 101st. (38:00)
They were flown to Phu Bai and waited for four to five hours before someone came down
from Camp Evans to pick them up. They were sent north in a convoy with several other
vehicles that were all guarded.
Since Frank worked at the Post Office, he was sent to the 101st mailroom and stayed there
for two weeks.
After that, he was given a combat assignment in the jungle near Firebase Ripcord.
(40:40)
When he landed in the jungle, his squad was waiting for him. Frank was considered an
FNG „Fucking New Guy‟, and he could tell by the look on the faces of his men that they
were worried.
Right away, he told the men that he wanted to get out of there alive, and he wanted them
to leave with him. Frank told his radio operator to babysit him for the first month and
help him along. (42:25)
Frank pitched in and helped with tasks like hauling the machine guns and other things
because he wanted to establish unit cohesiveness. He was petrified for the entire time he
was out in the bush and he did not get three hours of sleep for three and a half months.
(44:45)
It was the tail end of monsoon season, so it was wet and humid.
Frank was so scared out there, but he never showed it because he had to lead his men.
His mission was to search and destroy, but they did not get hit very often. They did get a
lot of mortar incomings and they found booby traps. They worked along Highway One
to the A Shau Valley. He would go out for a week and then come back in. (47:15)
Franks experience in the field was that they never knew what was going to happen the
next hour.
Frank was with Charlie Company, 1/506th, 101st Airborne. He operated between Camp
Evans and Ripcord. They worked the jungle, trails and some of the rivers. They would
go out and set up camp, then see what they could drum up. They always moved in squad
size and they had four squads. (49:36)
For the first month, Frank lost a lot of weight and had a tough time acclimatizing to the
climate of Vietnam.
After seeing what the NVA and Viet Cong did to their own people for helping the
Americans, Frank began to lose the fear of being hit and just wanted to get them back.

�










They called Frank “Sergeant Kaboom” because he loved to call in airstrikes and then sit
back and watch them come in. He was also great with a map; he always knew where he
was and where everyone else was too. (51:12)
Frank felt that once he got there, things were starting to wind down. From February to
mid May, it was relatively quiet and he thought he had the enemy on the run. (53:30)
He had a Kit Carson Scout with them that was a former Viet Cong and about 16 years
old. Frank‟s mother sent panty hose, make-up, hair spray and many other things for the
boy‟s family. After that, he was like Frank‟s body guard, he loved him.
They also had a dog unit attached to them for a little while.
Frank had three MOS‟s, Eleven Bravo (basic infantry), Eleven Charlie (mortar man) and
Eleven Foxtrot (intelligence specialist). Because of his intelligence background, he was
sent to Camp Evans to run the base defense at the Headquarters TOC. (56:00)
He did not want the job, but he was told that he was the only man in the company with
that MOS. When he left his men, Frank told them he would send them something back
out. Frank knew what they needed so he sent socks, foot powder, food, beer, ice, boots,
undershirts, shorts, shoelaces, candy, writing paper, and a few Playboy magazines.
(57:44)
For his new job, he coordinated base security and flights going in and out of the base. He
would usually start around 4 or 5 in the afternoon, and work until 6 or 7 am. During that
time, they moved personnel and material to and from the firebases. He also organized the
wounded being sent back to the rear. (59:25)
He did all this without any form of technology besides a rotary phone and two crank
radios. They used shackle codes that changed every twenty four hours. These were
passwords that everybody needed to know. Frank‟s call sign on the radio was „Boston
Blackie‟. (1:01:05)

Ripcord (1:01:35)










Frank knew that something was going on up at Firebase Ripcord, but he was so busy
running the TOC (Tactical Operations Center) that he did not pay much attention to it.
Because he did such a good job, he was more or less left alone by his superiors. (1:03:38)
Frank worked with a man named Steve McCarthy, who was a good friend and helped him
get through the experience.
The daily routine for them was when they first got into the office they would check the
logs from the night before for any activity, enemy contacts, reinforcement requirements
and anything else that needed to be done. (1:05:24)
Because he ran the TOC, he was able to get to know everybody in several different units
and could acquire things if they were needed.
He knew where everything was and how to get anything that someone asked him for.
Once he got out of the field, it was much like a normal job. (1:07:32)
Towards the end of Ripcord, it began to get his attention.
Racial tensions came around June 1970 and a rumor came through that said the black
soldiers were going to try to take the TOC. He went in to the colonel and told him
immediately. He then went down to the armory and got an M-60 [machine gun] and he
bolted it to his desk. Frank also contacted every unit and sent out a directive that said

�





that anyone that went down to the TOC and tried to compromise base security would be
shot on sight. (1:09:29)
One day, he took a flight up to Ripcord around June and asked the men what they needed.
He arranged to get the men what they requested.
Frank only went up there twice, once for the meet and greet and to see what they needed,
and then again to survey the area. (1:11:35)
On July 4th, things really escalated and they really started sending a lot of air strikes and
support up to Ripcord.
On July 22 and 23, they began to organize a massive amount of helicopters to go up there
and remove the equipment, guns and evacuate personnel. (1:14:23)
Frank will never forget seeing the men that came off the helicopters when they returned
from Ripcord. He sent everyone to the TOC to help get the wounded off the choppers
and to the appropriate areas. The men looked like they had just looked into the face of
the devil himself. (1:16:50)

Life on Camp Evans (1:18:32)












Life on the base was very different than life in the field. He showered twice a week with
hot water, which was great. There were no cuts, scrapes, leeches, pongee sticks and they
had a mess hall. (1:19:28)
Frank had a freezer in the TOC and he had his father send them popsicles from home.
They would then use these as a medium for trade. He could get steak, lobster, shrimp and
many other things for them.
Being back in the rear, they also had to deal with people that wanted to stay out of the
field. They also had „dope hooch‟ which was where people went to smoke dope.
(1:21:42)
Every night, Frank would go out along the line and check each bunker. He would find
men sleeping while on duty or smoking dope and he gave each one an Article 15 on the
spot. He told them that if he caught them again they would be sent straight to the brig.
They also had a Black Power movement on the base. There were nine black soldiers that
refused to go out in the field. They were referred to as the “Evans Nine”. The men were
locked up until they were able to be sent to Long Binh Jail. (1:23:13)
Heroin was two dollars a bag in the villages. Frank never did any drugs of any kind
while in Vietnam. Camp Evans also had a lot of marijuana. (1:25:55)
Morale was pretty good on base while Frank was there. They would get incoming
mortars from time to time, but otherwise, since it was a big base the enemy couldn‟t do
much to them.
Once they were showing a movie on a Friday night, when they had incomings come in
and they all just took off. (1:27:18)
They had Vietnamese nationals that worked on the base, but Frank never trusted them
and once they caught a worker stepping off the distance between the TOC and the other
buildings. Frank caught the guy and had him arrested. Another worker that worked in
the base laundry was a Viet Cong sympathizer. (1:29:27)
According to Frank, the real heroes of the Vietnam War were the nurses and the scout
dogs.

�









Frank was in Vietnam for 10 months and 20 days. After Ripcord things really quieted
down and they had a long lull. When he picked up the mail one day, he learned that he
was going home on December 21st, which was forty days from then. He didn‟t tell
anyone because he wanted to surprise his family.
To pass the time he would commandeer a pilot and take helicopter rides around the
area.(1:31:47)
A friend of Frank‟s from Boston had an uncle that was a two star general. One day he
called and told Frank that he was going to send a command helicopter down to pick him
up and bring him to a change of command ceremony in Da Nang. Frank attended the
ceremony with General Westmoreland, General Abrams, the Vice President of Vietnam
and the American Ambassador. When he got there, a lieutenant was the door man and he
told Frank to beat it before he had him arrested. Frank told the lieutenant to find General
Collins, which he did and they had a great party. (1:36:56)
Vietnam wasn‟t all bad for Frank, it was peaks and valleys.
They had a Halloween party and a horrible excuse for a Christmas tree.
Frank did lose four friends while in Vietnam. (1:38:27)
Frank had a chance to go to Sydney, Australia on R&amp;R, but instead he went home early.

Back in the States (1:40:59)









Frank left Fort Lewis, Washington on December 24. He arrived home on Christmas
morning at 9:30 am. He snuck in the house and he could hear his parents talking in the
other room. He walked in and surprised them. Frank was so skinny when he got home,
he weighed 118 lbs. (1:42:49)
Once he was home, Frank began working at the Post Office again two weeks after getting
back from Vietnam. He was put on the night shift, and because of the amount of stress he
had been under, he did not get a full nights sleep until June. (1:45:08)
At work, he started to exhibit anger. One of his supervisors at work was a Marine who
served in Korea. He had it out for him and one day it came to fighting. A year later he
quit the Postal Service and on April 1972 he began working as an insulator like his father.
(1:47:15)
Frank also began taking a few college courses which he was successful at. Looking back,
Frank wishes he would have finished his education sooner.
He stayed in the insulation business and retired in 2005. He has lived and worked in 41
states and has been a boss, general foreman and a superintendent. His service in Vietnam
enabled him to look at any task with confidence and perform any task well.
He graduated from the University of Massachusetts in Boston in 1989 with a degree in
marketing and management.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538497">
                <text>Delfino, Frank (Interview outline and video), 2013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538498">
                <text>Delfino, Frank</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538499">
                <text>Frank was born in Boston, Massachusetts on January 21, 1949.  He graduated from high school in June 1966 and had two unsuccessful attempts at college.  He worked for the United States Postal Service and received his draft notice on his twentieth birthday 1969.  Frank was drafted into the United States Army.  After basic training and AIT, he attended mortar school and the NCO training school in Fort Benning, Georgia.  He served for several months as the training NCO at Fort Riley before being sent to Vietnam.  Frank was attached to Charlie Company, 1/506th, 101st Airborne and was stationed out of Camp Evans.  Frank was involved with Firebase Ripcord and later operated the TOC at Camp Evans and was in charge of base defenses.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538500">
                <text>Smither, James (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538502">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538503">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538504">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538505">
                <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538506">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538507">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538508">
                <text>United States. Army</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538509">
                <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538510">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538511">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538512">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538513">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538518">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538519">
                <text>2013-10-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547584">
                <text>DelfinoF1547V</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567347">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project Collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794822">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796886">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030942">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="28813" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31382">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/fc35a8b8a98c59a22c3561df0acfba19.mp4</src>
        <authentication>651f0e3e33ac37a0f009eb6d79f5169b</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="31383">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/40841bc2d9e0c426f4dc68e7323bb474.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4d8a383ba81cee0c3472eede4554afec</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="538546">
                    <text>Grand Valley State Veterans History Project
Valeria Dellinger
WWII Veteran
United States Army
(42:03)
(00:23)Detroit Michigan
 Valeria was born April 4 1925 at her grandmothers home in Detroit
 Valeria’s father worked for Ford Motor Company and her mother was a stay at home
mother
 Their house was on the west side of Detroit by St. Lawrence Church. Valeria remembers
playing jacks on her porch when she was young.
 (3:40)Valeria remembers starting pre-school in Detroit and attending a Catholic school
for 6th and 7th grade. It takes two years of Catholic school to be confirmed.
 (5:20)Valeria returned to public school for 8th grade and on thru high school. She
attended Chadsey High School on the west side of Detroit. Valeria was 5’9” in high
school so she played basketball and did very well at it.
 She attended her senior prom with a fellow she can not remember his name.
 She did graduate high school.
 (7:40)After graduation she worked for Michigan Bell training to be a telephone operator
 Valeria was 18 years old when she graduated
 Valeria was at the movies when Pearl Harbor was attacked. Her mom told her when she
returned home. She had no idea where Pearl Harbor was.
 Her cousin went into the Coast Guard and his ship was bombed and died.
 Her younger cousin went into the Coast Guard also and he didn’t weigh enough and was
told to eat bananas so he would weigh enough. He came home safe
 (10:00)Valeria also had a female cousin who was a year older than her that also went
into the war. She says that her entire family was set on Japan not winning this war.
 Valeria went to the movies twice a week and they would give newsreels about the war
during the movies. She remembers seeing television for the first time and thought it
was great to have the movies in her own home.
 Valeria originally tried to enlist into the Marine Corps but was told they had enough
women enlisted already. She wanted to serve her country anyway possible so she
enlisted into the Army.
 To enlist, she had to go to the recruiting office and be sworn in. Her parents also had to
sign for her to do this. She remembers while in basic training she was investigated
because she was supposed to go to Los Alamos.
(12:20)Basic Training-Des Moines Iowa
 Valeria’s uniform needed to be altered because she was tall and thin. She said they
were nice uniforms though.
 During basic training, Valeria attended classes, drilled and marched. She said there was
no rifle training.
 The Army had prior knowledge of her experience with the telephone company.

�



Valeria was in basic training for about six weeks.
(13:50)Valeria was in basic training in the spring of 1945.
She was interviewed after basic training on where she wanted to work at. She wanted
to be a nurse’s aide but was told they had enough of them. She was told they need
switchboard operators in the south west. They did not tell in it was in Los Alamos.
 Valeria took a train along with civilians and service men and women to Los Alamos.
 (15:35) Valeria was surprised to pull into Santa Fe, New Mexico. She wondered where
she was with such a small city.
 Before going to Los Alamos they had to go to Oak Ridge Tennessee for a physical and a
psychological testing to be performed. One female was traveling with her from basic
training to Tennessee and to New Mexico.
 Valeria was asked by the psychologist what company of people she preferred, men or
women? She answered women. He asked if she planned on getting married. She said
yes and he let her go. Her friend was asked the same question and answered men to
the first question and he told her he needed to see her back again.
 (18:00)She met her husband in 1946 [1945?] during the Battle of the Bulge while he was
serving in the war. He was from North Carolina but recently died on Christmas Day. He
put in 20 years in the service.
(19:00)New Mexico
 Valeria spent time her with dances, the movies, and at the PX where you could purchase
Coca Cola. She said they could be involved with sports but she decided not to. All of
this was on the base.
 Valeria did not have to do KP duty. They had Mexicans doing all of those duties.
 You were not allowed to listen in on conversations or ask questions. She didn’t mind
because she wasn’t curious.
 Valeria has a book about what was expected of them.
 (21:10)She went to a dance with a fellow and met another guy from his barracks. He
asked her to the movies and ended marrying him. She says she was very shy at the time
so she double dated with her friend and her boyfriend.
 Valeria’s husband had previously served in Germany but re-enlisted and was sent to
New Mexico.
 (24:00)Valeria’s husband’s brother was a prisoner of war during the Battle of the Bulge
and escaped. She remembers her husband saying that he hated the Germans but
figured that was a result of having to fight them in the war. She did not ask her husband
much about the war thinking he probably would not have wanted to talk about it
anyways.
 She says she served until November 1946 when she was discharged. She was engaged
at the time.
 Her husbands name was A.G. She called him Bill.
(25:33)Home in Michigan
 Once Valeria was discharged she came home. She obtained clothes for their wedding
and headed back to New Mexico.
(25:50)Los Alamos, New Mexico
 May 1947 she was married at Los Alamos where he was still stationed. She received a
job for the civil service as a switchboard operator.
 Valeria’s husband was transferred to Albuquerque, New Mexico
 Valeria had a daughter in 1948 and discontinued working at this point.

�



Her husband was a security guard and MP at this point.
In 1952 her son was born.
(28:40)Valeria’s husband was asked to go to the Pacific for service. He did not tell her it
was for Hydrogen bomb testing. At this point, Valeria returned home to Detroit. Her
son was four months old at this time.
 In 1953, Valeria said she saw it in the news that they had tested the hydrogen bomb.
Her husband was there a year and she knew he would be coming home at that point.
 (30:30)1953, Valeria’s husband requested to be transferred to North Carolina at Fort
Bragg. Valeria moved to North Carolina till they divorced in 1956.
 Valeria took her two children back to Detroit and did not remarry.
 Valeria’s children are Linda and Alan.
 Linda is a housewife with no children and Alan works with construction building new
homes. He married a woman with two children but no biological children. There are
two grandchildren Gabriel and Kylie.
 (34:00) Valeria’s mother’s maiden name was Katherine Puskarz and her father was
Joseph Wysick. Her grandmother’s name was Mary.
 Valeria has two younger siblings, Raymond and Theresa. They called her Tessie.
 (35:20)Valeria came to the Veterans home when she couldn’t take care of herself. She
had an apartment in Farmington Hills. Her son lives in Rockford.
 She said something happened to her mind that made things too complicated for her to
handle alone. Her daughter found the facility on the internet.
 (38:00)Her daughter in law comes and visits her once a week and does all her laundry
for her and brings it to her.
 Valeria enjoys being at the Veterans home. She says she is kept busy. She enjoys playing
bingo.
(40:50)Affects of the war on Valeria’s life
 Valeria feels that the service made her more outgoing and met many women and men
during her time in the service that became great friends.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538522">
                <text>Dellinger, Valeria (Interview outline and video), 2006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538523">
                <text>Dellinger, Valeria</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538524">
                <text>Valeria Dellinger was a veteran of WWII in the United States Army in 1945 and 1946.  She served in Los Alamos, New Mexico as a switchboard operator for the military at the time of the development of the atomic bomb.  She married her husband after she was discharged in 1946.  He remained a MP for the military and transferred to the Pacific when they were testing the atomic bomb, while she stayed on at Los Alamos in the civil service for a while before moving to Michigan.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538525">
                <text>Collins Sr., Charles E. (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538526">
                <text> Collins, Carol (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538528">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538529">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538530">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538531">
                <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538532">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538533">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538534">
                <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538535">
                <text>United States. Army. Women's Army Corps</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538536">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538537">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538538">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538539">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538544">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538545">
                <text>2006-10-16</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547585">
                <text>DellingerV0226V</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567348">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project Collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794823">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796887">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030943">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="28862" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31469">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/82ef85a8bedf2f2392579586084ae6c5.m4v</src>
        <authentication>1bfcd697458ec5d24f71fd99099b2eb7</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="31470">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8635af1528d542c2c8f315a5e4e89720.pdf</src>
        <authentication>41abcc56f1ee28d0e596bedefb60f371</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="539810">
                    <text>Grand Valley State University
Veterans History Project Interview
Glenn Dells
(Length 14:19)

Vietnam Veteran
1966-70

(00:19) Pre-enlistment:
• He lived in the north end of Grand Rapids where he finished high school
• Decided to enlist so that he could choose which branch of the military he serve in
• He actually enlisted before he was done with high school
(01:30) Enlistment:
• Served in Florida before he went to Vietnam
• Served in Phan Rang while in Vietnam
• He spent two years serving in Alpena, Michigan after he got back from Vietnam
(01:52) Military Occupational Service (MOS):
• He was a munitions specialist
• As a munitions specialist he would handle, build, deliver, blow up, and disarm bombs
• Sometimes he would have to go on patrol and would at times be shot at
(02:49) Good and Bad Memories:
• Meet a lot of friends
• He went to Vietnam right after his son was born and missed a year of his life
• His father died while he was over in Vietnam
• He remembers how he and other soldiers were treated terribly for serving their country
during Vietnam
(04:16) Casualties/Fear:
• His unit did not have many casualties
• He knew other units where only one guy survived
• He would wonder why it was not him who died instead
• He was fearful when bullets were flying by, but it was also exciting
• “Young people went to war because old people couldn’t do it”
(05:17) Food:
• They had cooks and mess tent, but sometimes the quality of food depended on the time of
season or how much combat was going on around their camp
• During periods where their camp was being attacked a lot they would have to eat sea
rations, cans of beans, and other foods like that

�(05:47) Free Time:
• They would drink a lot and do other things to try to forget what went on
• Sometimes they could go to the nearby villages
• They sat around, listened to music, and would go to the club where they would have
entertainment
• Got to see the Bob Hope show that held at his camp
• Mostly they worked and slept because they worked 12 hour days
(06:36) Vietnam Civilians:
• A lot of Vietnamese worked at their base
• He had a Vietnamese maid that ended up getting killed when she was taking part in an
attack on their base
• He was almost killed by a 75 year old women, and by a group of 6 children ages between
7-10 years old
• No one knew who was friend or foe
(08:01) Keeping in Touch:
• Mainly letters were the only form communicate with those back home
• They got to make a three minute phone call once during Christmas
• The phone call was made through HAM operators, so he never got to hear the voice of
the person he was trying to talk to
(08:53) Holidays:
• He might have gotten a box of cookies or something like that, but for the most part there
was no celebration
(09:14) Skills/Lessons Learned:
• He learned to take orders, and how to do the job right
• He learned how take pride in doing your job, and how to take pride in yourself
• His skill in handling bombs was not of much help after the war
• He also learned how to cope with tragedy and success
• Learned how to be a better citizen
(10:15) After the War:
• Left Alpena with his family and headed back to Grand Rapids
• He was a medical technician at a VA hospital
• He worked with veterans that had many different problems
• He is now a maintenance man
(11:52) Thoughts on Military Service:
• Every man should spend some time in the military because it is their obligation
• He thinks that if we had to fight a war at home that people would thik differently about
military service
• We are lucky to live in this country were we have many rights others around the world
do not have

�(13:12) Military Organizations:
• He is a member of the VFW and the American Legion
(13:24) Pictures:
• Him standing in military gear
• Him standing next to bombs
• Digging and filling sand bags
• Him after the war in a nice car
• His lighter from Vietnam (front and back)
• What looks like a picture of him coming back from Vietnam

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539785">
                <text>Dells, Glen (Interview outline and video), 2007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539786">
                <text>Dells, Glen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539787">
                <text>Glenn Dells served in the United States Air Force during the Vietnam War from 1966 to1970. His military occupational service (MOS) during Vietnam was munitions specialist; which meant that he built, delivered, blew up, and disarmed bombs. He was stationed in Phan Rang when he served his time in Vietnam. He talks about his experiences with the Vietnamese population, and how it was difficult for him to distinguish friend from foe. He discusses some of the regrets he had about serving in Vietnam; like missing a year of his son's life. He talks about what he and others would do when they had some free time, and how they got to see the Bob Hope show at their base. He tells about how they would normally communicate with those back home, and how they were allowed to make a 3 minute phone call via HAM operators on Christmas. He talks about what he had learned from serving in the military during Vietnam. Some of what he learned was how to take orders, how take pride in doing your job, and how to take pride in yourself. He also talks about how he feels on the subject of serving in the military today.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539790">
                <text>Vanwyck, Kayla (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539792">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539793">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539794">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539795">
                <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539796">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539797">
                <text>United States. Air Force</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539798">
                <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539799">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539800">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539801">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539802">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="539803">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539808">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="539809">
                <text>2007-06-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547630">
                <text>DellsG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567393">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project Collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794868">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796929">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030988">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54816" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59086">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/35012776894882cb4b443e7e2ef5f28c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>eee080488cea62ec834d1108e6b0adfd</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010122">
                    <text>VILLAGE OF SEBEWAING
PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2018

,/IlllJge 9"

/%,~
SEBEWAING

�Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................1
REMEMBERING THE VALUE OF PUBLIC PARKS ................................................................................................2
REGIONAL SETTING &amp; LOCATION ....................................................................................................................3
II. ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE ..........................................................................................................................5
BUDGETS &amp; FUNDING.........................................................................................................................................5
ROLE OF VOLUNTEERS ......................................................................................................................................6
RELATIONSHIP WITH SCHOOL DISTRICTS, OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES OR PRIVATE ORGANZATIONS ...6
III. RECREATIONAL INVENTORY ............................................................................................................................7
EXISTING RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES ...................................................................................................7
COMPARISON TO STANDARDS ..................................................................................................................... 12
IV. COMMUNITY INPUT ........................................................................................................................................ 14
SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................ 14
PUBLIC MEETING OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................... 15
V. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 16
GOAL 1 .............................................................................................................................................................. 16
GOAL 2 .............................................................................................................................................................. 17
GOAL 3 .............................................................................................................................................................. 17
GOAL 4 .............................................................................................................................................................. 17
VI. ACTION PROGRAM ......................................................................................................................................... 18
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 18
IDENTIFIED PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................... 18
FINANCING POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS..................................................................................................... 20
VII. HARBOR PLAN ................................................................................................................................................ 21
VII. SUMMARY AND ADOPTION........................................................................................................................... 25
A COMMUNITY PLAN ....................................................................................................................................... 25
APPENDIX A........................................................................................................................................................... 27
APPENDIX B ........................................................................................................................................................... 29
APPENDIX C .......................................................................................................................................................... 32
APPENDIX D .......................................................................................................................................................... 36
APPENDIX E ........................................................................................................................................................... 42
APPENDIX F ........................................................................................................................................................... 43

�Recreation, parks, and open space are important to the residents in the Sebewaing area. In this
community, these amenities add to the quality of life for residents. Park special events are an
important economic component of community. Recognizing this, community officials have led an
effort to develop a Parks and Recreation Plan aimed at improving and developing recreational
resources in the Sebewaing area.
Broadly speaking, Sebewaing officials intend to use
this plan to guide their work on future recreational
and parks projects within the area. It is also a
strategic document that articulates specific goals to
various agencies and organizations that fund local
recreational and parks improvement projects. In
accordance with the State of Michigan
recommended five-year cycle for recreation
planning, this updated plan covers the five-year
period 2019-2023.
Specifically, this plan is developed in accordance with
the guidelines for Community Park, Recreation, Open Space, and Greenway Plans published by the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR).
This document is intended to serve as a guide in the planning for future park and recreation
opportunities, services, and implementation. Population shifts, new development, and changing
attitudes towards leisure can add demands upon the community’s existing parks and recreation
system, thus increasing the need for both short and long range planning. Recommendations such as
land acquisition, and facility expansions and construction, and even the design of a neighborhood
park improvement, will require additional study or involvement of residents in order to address the
site-specific details. This plan lays the foundation upon which these activities can build.
Implementation strategies are identified over the next five years, at which time the plan will again
be updated. The delineation of these improvements will aid Sebewaing in grant solicitation from
the DNR and others for long-range capital improvement budgeting. Additionally, during the next
five years, it is important for the community to refer to the plan and make appropriate priority
adjustments as conditions change and funding opportunities arise.
This plan is written for the Village of Sebewaing. However, it is recognized that the Village of
Sebewaing provides recreation for much of the surrounding area, since some of those
communities have no parks of their own. The parks in Sebewaing serve many of the residents of
the Unionville-Sebewaing Area School District. This includes all or portions of Sebewaing
Township, Akron Township, Columbia Township, Wisner Township, and Fairhaven Township.
1

�According to the National Park and Recreation Association, parks and recreation have three values
that make them essential services to communities:

o

o

o
o
o

o

o
o

Parks improve the local tax base and increase property values. It is proven that private
property values increase the closer such land is to parks. This increase in private property
value due to the proximity to parks increases property tax revenues and improves local
economies.
Parks and recreation programs and facilities provide significant indirect revenues to local
and regional economies from sports tournaments and special events such as arts, music,
and holiday festivals. Economic activity from hospitality expenditures, tourism, fuel,
recreational equipment sales, and many other private sector businesses is of true and
sustained value to local and regional economies. This indirect economic value is in addition
to direct revenues that are gained from park facilities and programs.

Parks are the places that people go to get healthy and stay fit.
Parks and recreation programs and services contribute to the health of children, youth,
adults, and seniors.
Parks and protected public lands are proven to improve water quality, protect groundwater,
prevent flooding, improve the quality of the air we breathe, provide vegetative buffers to
development, produce habitat for wildlife, and provide a place for children and families to
connect with nature and recreate outdoors together.

Parks are a tangible reflection of the quality of life in a community. They provide identity for
citizens and are a major factor in the perception of quality of life in a given community.
Parks and recreation services are often cited as one of the most important factors in
surveys of how livable communities are.
Parks provide gathering places for families and social groups, as well as for individuals of all
ages and economic status.
Parks have a value to communities that transcend the amount of dollars invested or the
revenues gained from fees. Parks provide a sense of public pride and cohesion to every
community.

2

�Huron County

Sebewaing

The Village of Sebewaing is located in southwestern Huron County on the shores of Lake Huron
and Saginaw Bay. The marine area around Sebewaing possesses rich marshland habitat and offers
excellent fishing, hunting, and boating opportunities. The community is rural and most of the land
surrounding Sebewaing is used for agricultural purposes. The Village of Sebewaing is surrounded
by Sebewaing Township.
Sebewaing is 28 miles northeast of Bay City, 43 miles from Saginaw, and 72 miles from Flint. M-25 is
the major traffic carrier into Sebewaing, carrying a large volume of traffic from Bay City, Saginaw,
and other areas down state into the thumb. Huron County is an attractive area for vacationers and
day-trippers from the metropolitan Detroit region. Other practical routes to the Huron County
area include M-53 and I-75. Distance to Detroit is 115 miles and Bad Axe, the Huron County seat, is
24 miles from Sebewaing.
3

�The parks in Sebewaing serve as a community gathering point for residents of the UnionvilleSebewaing Area School District which encompasses parts of several surrounding communities.
Some of these communities do not have any parks of their own. These would include Wisner,
Akron, and Columbia Townships in Tuscola County and Fairhaven, and Sebewaing Townships in
Huron County.
According to the 2016 American Community Survey the population of the Village of Sebewaing
was 1,610. This is a 9.25% decrease from the 2010 census (1,759.)
A significant characteristic of Sebewaing is the high median age. The median of 51.8 years is more
than 10 years higher than the State of Michigan. An older population has some unique needs in
terms of recreational facilities the Village will want to consider when it plans for the future. Other
selected demographic characteristics are shown in Figure 2.
Sebewaing

Sebewaing
Township

Huron County

Michigan

2010

2016

2010

2016

2010

2016

2010

2016

44.9

51.8

44.7

48.3

46.8

48.3

38.9

39.5

18.60%

16.00%

22.80%

20.50%

22.70%

21.70%

23.70%

25.30%

2.19

2.11

2.3

2.3

2.27

2.27

2.49

2.51

Bachelor's Degree of Higher

12.70%

13.00%

11.30%

12.30%

12.80%

14.90%

25.00%

27.40%

Median Household Income
(in 2016 dollars)

$45,004

$41,324

$46,240

$51,384

$44,115

$43,082

$53,212

$50,803

Per Capita Income
(in 2016 dollars)

$23,283

$22,875

$23,753

$26,260

$22,760

$24,455

$27,860

$27,549

Disabled

16.80%

17.76%

12.90%

13.40%

16.80%

16.09%

13.70%

14.07%

Median Age
Population Under 20
Average Household size

4

�The Village Council in Sebewaing makes all decisions regarding parks in the community. The Village
of Sebewaing's Department of Public Works (DPW) operates its parks and recreation facilities.
Working under the direction of the Sebewaing DPW Committee, the DPW maintains and plans
improvements for its recreation facilities. Figure 3 diagrams the administrative structure that
provides recreation opportunities in the Village of Sebewaing.

Village Council

The DPW Committee


Department of Public Works

The overall budget for parks and recreation in the Village of Sebewaing for the 2017-2018 fiscal
year was $266,045, of which $220,000 was for the replacement of the Main Park Restroom. The
budget for parks and recreation for fiscal year 2018-2019 is $59,000. In anticipation of the future
replacement of the playscape at the Main Park, $10,000 was included in this fiscal year’s budget.
Given the playscape’s current condition, it is estimated that its useful life will expire in the next 5
years and the structure will need to be replaced.
The budget amounts include operation, maintenance, and capital improvements. All decisions
regarding funding for parks and recreation are made by the Village Council. Funding for the parks
and recreation functions in Sebewaing include the Village General Fund, rental fees, donations, and
grants. A breakdown of the Village’s parks and recreation budget is included in Appendix A.

5

�Volunteer groups support and promote the recreation programs in Sebewaing. The UnionvilleSebewaing Area Softball/Baseball Association runs a girls summer ball league in Sebewaing and a
boy’s ball league in Unionville. Another group runs a women’s adult softball league that plays twice
a week in the summer. The M-46 Horseshoe Association has run a horseshoe league in Sebewaing
for more than 30 years.

The Village of Sebewaing works closely with various community groups to coordinate and host
special events in the Sebewaing parks. The Sebewaing Chamber of Commerce hosts the annual
Michigan Sugar Festival, which is a large tourism draw for the community. They also host the
Christmas Lighted Parade that ends at the Main Park. In addition, Moonlight Madness and RiverFire
are events occurring in October and taking place by the Muellerweiss Park each year. Other events
organized by the Chamber of Commerce include a weekly farmers market and the annual County
Market and Music Fest that take over parts of the street and Muellerweiss Park each year.
The Sebewaing Lions Club and the Sebewaing Rotary Club host an annual men’s slowpitch softball
tournament in Sebewaing. It also brings a large number of visitors to the community for the
weekend.
The Chamber of Commerce, the Lions Club, the Rotary Club, and other local groups have donated
funds for various projects and initiatives in the Sebewaing Parks. These include match money for an
acquisition grant, picnic facilities, and ball diamond lighting.
6

�In order to plan for parks and recreation in the future, the types of facilities that currently exist in
Sebewaing need to be examined. It is also helpful to compare these existing facilities to various
standards as one measure of the adequacy of the parks and recreation facilities in the community.

A survey of existing recreation facilities available to residents of the Village was conducted in June
of 2014 and updated in 2018. The results of this survey indicated there are numerous recreation
facilities located within Sebewaing, including five village parks, some private facilities and a county
park. An inventory chart is included in Figure 4 and a location map is presented in Figure 5. The
inventory chart also includes a basic accessibility assessment and a listing of the service area for
each park. Past improvements to existing facilities that were completed with the support of the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources are provided in Appendix B.
A brief description of the village parks and other recreational opportunities is given in the following
paragraphs. For more information about the village parks, visit the Village of Sebewaing website at
http://www.sebewaingmi.gov/village-parks.html
(127 South Third Street) is the largest and most central park in
Sebewaing and is divided between the Main and South sections. In total it is 18 acres in size and
provides three ball diamonds, picnic areas, eight basketball courts, two tennis courts, a large play
structure, a small play structure, horseshoe pits, a volleyball court, a concession stand, an open
playfield, three shelters, and two restrooms. It serves as a community gathering point for league
sports, festivals, and special events.

7

�(14 West Sebewaing Street) is a small passive park located on the river in
downtown Sebewaing. It is one acre in size and has a picnic area, benches, a Veterans’ memorial,
and restrooms. Muellerweiss Park is frequently used for village events throughout the year.

(West Sebewaing Street) is one acre in size and is located near the
marina. It includes a playground and a gazebo with seating.

(Eighth Street) is just over a half-acre in size and has a
basketball court, a picnic area, playground equipment, and an open playfield.

8

�(700 West Sebewaing Street) is owned jointly by the
Village of Sebewaing and Sebewaing Township. Operation of the facility is contracted to a private
entity. It includes 80 boat slips, four boat launches, and restrooms. It is located near the mouth of
the Sebewaing River on Saginaw Bay.

The Sebewaing area includes the following other recreation facilities:

o New Salem Evangelical Lutheran School (214 Grove Street) – outdoor basketball court
o Christ the King Lutheran School (612 Bay Street) – outdoor basketball court and sports
fields
o Sebewaing River Campground (537 Union Street) – campground along the river
o Sebewaing County Park (759 Union Street) – campground with picnic area, trails,
playground equipment

9

�Parking

Camping

Restrooms

Boat Launch

Shelter

Waterfront Property

Nature Trails

Playfield (open)

Playground Equipment

Picnic Area

Tennis Courts

Soccer/Football

Basketball

Ball Diamonds

Volleyball

Service Area**

Accessibility*

Acreage

SEBEWAING AREA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES

Comments

Village Parks
Village Park: Main and South

18

3

R

2 restrooms, multiple picnic
areas, multiple sports facilities,
drinking fountain, BBQ pit

Muellerweiss Park

1

3

V

Fishing platform, Veteran's
Memorial

Pitcher Memorial Park

1

3

V

Gazebo

Northside Neighborhood Park

0.5

2

N

Drinking fountain

Sebewaing Harbor and Marina

11

4

R

4 boat launches, 2 restrooms,
fishing, laundry and showers

26

R

54 hook up sites, 10 tent sites,
fishing

Sebewaing River Campground

6.2

R

73 camp sites, fishing

New Salem Evangelical Lutheran
School

0.5

V

Christ the King Lutheran School

10

V

County Parks
Sebewaing County Park
Other Recreation

5 soccer, 1 football

* 1 - None of the facilities/park areas meet accessibility guidelines. 2 - Some of the facilities/park area meet accessibility guidelines. 3 - Most of the facilities/park area meet accessibility guidelines.
4 - The entire park meets accessibility guidelines. 5 - The entire park was developed/renovated using the principles of universal design.
** R = Regional, V = Village, N = Neighborhood

FIGURE 4 - RECREATION INVENTORY

10

�9
10

FIGURE 5 - PARK LOCATION MAP

VILLAGE OF SEBEWAING PARKS

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Muellerweiss Park
Village Park: Main and South
Pitcher Memorial Park
Northside Neighborhood Park
Sebewaing Harbor and Marina

OTHER RECREATION

6. Christ the King Lutheran

School
7. New Salem Lutheran School
8. Sebewaing River Campground
9. Bay Shore Nature Trail (in progress)
COUNTY PARK
10. Sebewaing County Park

11

�The Village of Sebewaing has approximately 30 acres of park land for its 1,610 citizens. General
industry standards would suggest 5-10 acres of park land per 1,000 citizens. This would suggest
that the Village of Sebewaing has adequate park land for its citizens. However, if one considers the
larger service area which includes the entire Unionville-Sebewaing Area School District, the Village
may be somewhat lacking in park land. This is why the community input portion of the Recreation
Plan is so important. It provides feedback from citizens about what else is needed in terms of park
land and facilities in the community.
As a supplement to the recommended standard for park acreage, recreation and tourism data from
peer municipalities, Huron County, and the State of Michigan can be used to help understand
broader trends in recreation and tourism. It is important to be aware of local and state trends in
recreation and tourism to ensure the Village of Sebewaing is keeping pace with changes in demand
and maximizing planning and funding opportunities with regional stakeholders. Figure 6.1 shows
Huron County is lagging slightly in tourism spending growth in eastern Michigan in comparison to
other counties. Figure 6.2 shows the share of employment within the tourism industry, indicating
the importance of tourism and recreation related jobs to Huron County.
Within the broader state and county-wide trends in recreation, kayaking is growing in popularity
and provides a unique way for residents and visitors to access the natural assets of Saginaw Bay.
This can be seen in recent growth of water trails, some planned and funded with DNR grant
sources, in Saginaw Bay including The Tip of the Thumb Heritage Water Trail, Saginaw Bay Water
Trail, Au Gres River Excursion, Rifle River Trail, Kawkawlin River Trail, and Saginaw River Historical
Excursion.

12

�FIGURE 6.1 - East Michigan Visitor Spending by County

FIGURE 6.2 - East Michigan Tourism Direct and Total Tourism Jobs by County, 2014

Source: Tourism Economics

Source: Tourism Economics

13

�To comply with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Guidelines for the Development of
Community Park, Recreation Open Space and Greenway Plans, the Village of Sebewaing offered
three opportunities for public input along with a 65-day period for review and comment on the
draft plan.
The first opportunity for public input was through a community survey, the second at a public
meeting held on June 7, 2018 and the third opportunity was a public hearing held on October 15,
2018.
As part of the Village of Sebewaing’s Master Planning process, the Master Plan Steering Committee
undertook a community survey in order to gather feedback on a variety of questions related to the
Master Plan and Recreation Master Plan. The survey was open for three weeks, from January 29,
2018 through February 16, 2018 and was available to stakeholders on- line through QuestionPro as
well as in paper format. The paper surveys were available at the Village Office and Sebewaing Light
and Water Office. Steering Committee members also distributed paper surveys at businesses in
the Village and at the meetings they attended during the three weeks the survey was open. A copy
of the survey questions, along with a link to the survey response report can be found in Appendix C.

A total of 127 respondents completed the survey, with another 83 who started but did not
complete the survey. The project team transcribed the paper survey responses into QuestionPro
prior to running an analysis of results to ensure all responses were captured online. A copy of the
survey and results are available on line at https://www.questionpro.com/t/ PDOh5ZbTq6.
The community survey contained 22 questions and respondents were first asked basic questions
about their relationship to the Village of Sebewaing including if they are a resident, how long
they’ve lived in the Village, and their age. The majority of respondents (63.8%) were current
residents of the Village and just over a third of respondents (34.4%) have lived in the Village for 30
years or more. Of the visitors and past residents that participated in the survey (about 20% of
respondents), the vast majority of them come to Sebewaing more than 12 times per year. The
majority of survey participants were evenly distributed between 25 years old and 64 years old.

14

�Survey respondents expressed desire to maintain and enhance the existing park and recreational
facilities and to optimize utilization of Sebewaing's many natural resources for residents and
visitors alike. A link to the full survey questions and responses can be found in Appendix C,
however, an overview is provided below.

o Maintaining existing park and recreational facilities and attracting more
visitors/ tourists were both rated as high priority.

o Access to lakes and rivers, tourism, and preservation, protections, and
enhancements of natural resources were rated as important to the future of
Sebewaing.

o Wild life habitat and public land and open spaces were rated highest for
natural resources needing to be protected and enhanced.

o Boating and fishing, other recreation (kayaks, biking, etc.), outdoor events
(farmers markets, flea markets, tournaments, etc.), and camping were rated
highest priority for attracting more visitors and tourists to Sebewaing.

o Developing walking paths and bike routes to improve active transportation
assets were rated as high priority.

o Attracting more healthcare and related services was rated as medium priority.

On the evening of June 7, 2018, a public meeting was held to discuss the Village of Sebewaing
Recreation Plan update and the Master Plan. The meeting was publicized on the Village's website,
on social media, on the local radio station, and during other village meetings. Using sticker voting,
the 24 attendees had the opportunity to show their support or dissent for the four goals outlined in
the Recreation Plan. The result of the sticker voting was that all attendees voting agreed with the
proposed goals and activities outlined in the draft Recreation Plan. After the sticker voting ended,
participants had a discussion about the purpose of the Recreation Plan update and what they would
like to see included in the recreation plan. Meeting attendees indicated they would like to see
winter recreation activities added to increase the recreation opportunities for residents and
visitors all year- round.

15

�Developing goals and objectives is an important part of the recreation planning process. The
overall goal of parks and recreation departments is to provide recreational opportunities for the
community and/or region it serves, and possibly for tourists. More specific goals must be based on
the demographic characteristics of the population served and the physical and environmental
characteristics of the area.
During the course of the planning process, four goals and associated objectives were
development. Goals are general guidelines for what the community wants to achieve. The
objectives describe the specific future condition to carry out each goal. The Action Program is the
last level and the most specific. It outlines specific projects that have been identified.

Photo courtesy of MLive

Provide safe, broad community-based recreation opportunities that improve the overall
quality of life for all residents in the Village of Sebewaing.

o Objective: Add facilities to Sebewaing parks for all age groups and abilities based
upon community input and need.

o Objective: Improve and promote year-round, accessible recreational opportunities
along the Sebewaing River for residents and visitors of Sebewaing.

16

�Preserve and enhance the natural features and environment of the Village of Sebewaing
through sustainable implementation methods.

o
o
o

Objective: Promote sustainable infrastructure in Sebewaing where areas of poor
infrastructure exist.
Objective: Limit infrastructure in areas where floodplains exist to promote lowdevelopment recreational based projects.
Objective: Increase the quality of life of the Village of Sebewaing’s natural
environment.

Promote walkability between recreational opportunities in the Village of Sebewaing.

o

Objective: Connect the Historic River District area to recreational opportunities
through wayfinding and proper signage.

o

Objective: Improve and maintain facilities in parks and on walking routes to increase
ease of use, accessibility, and safety.

Attract and enhance opportunities for recreation-based tourism in Sebewaing

o

Objective: Increase and advertise the outdoor amenities in Sebewaing to allow the
Village to become a tourist destination year-round.

o

Objective: Use the existing and future recreational opportunities to draw in visitors
from outside of Sebewaing and Huron County.

17

�This Recreation Plan is intended to be a guiding document for the Village of Sebewaing in terms of
goals and capital improvements. The Village worked hard to determine the need for different
improvements and the potential users who would benefit from the improvements. The Village is
dedicated to providing recreation opportunities for residents of all ages and abilities, ensuring that
all improvements and upgrades to facilities are handicap accessible.
In addition, potential users include not only residents from the Village of Sebewaing, but also
residents located in other nearby communities who are part of the Unionville-Sebewaing Area
School District. As a provider of recreational opportunities to these other local jurisdictions, the
Village of Sebewaing considers its relationships to these people a critical component to the
success of this action program.
The project list in not a fixed element and is neither all-inclusive or exclusive. The schedule reflects
the results of the input received from the online survey, Village staff, and other general input
received from the community. Future circumstances, especially availability of funding, may change
priorities or require reprioritization of items.

1. Non-Motorized Walking Trail
An interconnected walking trail throughout the Village of Sebewaing will connect the Historic
River District area to some of the town’s natural features and Saginaw Bay. At the request of
the village stakeholders, this trail will provide new recreational opportunities while promoting
safety, walkability, and outdoor recreation. During the winter months, the non-motorized
walking trail will be open and marketed towards winter-time recreational uses, such as crosscountry skiing and snowshoeing.

2. Kayak Launch
A designated kayak launch will improve water safety and accessibility to Saginaw Bay for village
residents and visitors. The only official kayak launch in the Village is also the Sebewaing Harbor
Marina boat launch. Village stakeholders have expressed concerns for safety when small and
large boats are utilizing the same facility.

18

�3. Playscape at the Main Park
Replacing the playscape at the Main Park will
ensure the park amenities are maintained into the
future and continue to provide a safe and
attractive place for families to enjoy the park and
recreation opportunities in the Village. The
playscape was built in 2000 with a life expectancy
of 20 years. Given its current condition, it is
estimated its useful life will expire within the next 5
years and the structure will need to be replaced.

4. Village of Sebewaing Signage
Improved signage will increase connectivity between the roughly 40 acres of forested area,
nature trails, Sebewaing public parks, and the Bay Shore Camp. Currently there is minimal
signage throughout the village, limiting the ability of residents and visitors to utilize
recreational assets. Improved signage will promote recreational utilization for residents and
visitors. Increased connectivity between recreational facilities will also promote tourism in the
village, a stated interest of village stakeholders.

5. Village Park Walking Loop
A walking loop around the Village Main Park and Village South Park will improve utilization of the
largest and most popular park in the village for residents of all ages and abilities. Improved
parks and park equipment were a stated priority of village residents. A walking loop around the
Main and South Parks will improve utilization among the aging residential village population.

6. Park at 249 North Center Street (the former Lapeer Metal Stamping (LMS) site)
The 249 North Center Street property is a brownfield site in the heart of downtown Sebewaing.
Planning and design work has taken place to begin exploring the remediation and
redevelopment options for the site. A concept plan for the site, shown in Appendix E, envisions
a portion to be used as park space, creating additional park space in the Village of Sebewaing.

7. Recreation Facilities at the South Park
Identified projects include updating the basketball and tennis courts, adding a pickleball court,
and building a pavilion near these courts for park-goers. Seating near the horseshoe pits was
also identified as a needed improvement.

19

�Funding for parks and recreation capital improvements can come from a myriad of local, state, and
federal public programs as well as private groups and foundations. Grant funding is available for
parks and recreation projects. However, applicants need to target potential funding agencies and
programs very carefully so as to meet the specific criteria required. A current listing of programs
and agencies that can provide funding for parks and recreation projects is contained in Appendix D.

20

�Beginning in 2015, to be eligible for
Michigan State Waterways Grants, a
harbor in Michigan is required to be
included in a community’s Recreation Plan.
The discussion on the following pages
covers the required elements.
Name of Facility: Sebewaing Harbor
Marina
Location: 700 W Sebewaing Street
Sebewaing, Michigan 48759
The general purpose of the Sebewaing Harbor Marina is to provide recreation opportunities for
boaters and fisherman throughout the Midwest.

After a large section of dock was damaged by ice during the winter of 2014, 24 boat slips were
removed, reducing the number of boat slips from 104 to the current 80 slips. The facility includes a
four place boat launch. This is currently the right size for the existing demand and use.
The facilities were compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) when built, however,
improvements need to be made in order to maintain accessibility (See Large Scale Maintenance
and Replacement Schedule).

The Village of Sebewaing Site Development Plan includes two projects, which are outlined below
with the anticipated cost:
 Build a 1,800 square foot open air pavilion for community use: $45,000
 Install kayak facilities: $7,000

Marketing is handled by the subcontractor who manages the marina. The subcontractor maintains
a web site (www.sebewaingharbor.com) that can take reservations and provide general
information about the marina. Brochures are available and distributed around the county. The
marina information can also be viewed from other web sites such as www.marinas.com,
www.Michigan.org, the village website – www.sebewaingmi.gov, and the Sebewaing Area Chamber
of Commerce site, www.sebewaingchamber.com.

21

�The subcontractor markets the marina at two trade shows per year that are involved with boating,
sportsmen, and fishing. He also plans to increase marketing efforts to pilots because the marina is
directly adjacent to the small Sebewaing Township Airport.

The Sebewaing Chamber of Commerce and the marina subcontractor sponsor a fishing
contest at the marina during the annual Michigan Sugar Festival in June.

The Sebewaing Harbor Marina is operated jointly as a partnership between the Village of
Sebewaing and Sebewaing Township. Day to day management of the facility is subcontracted to a
private individual who also owns and manages the Sebewaing River Campground across the river.

The channel leading into the marina normally needs dredging approximately every three to five
years, depending on water levels. Approximately 70,000 to 100,000 cubic yards of dirt are removed
during the dredging. The Village uses three different confined disposal facilities (CDF’s) for the
spoils. Two are adjacent to the channel and the third is located approximately ¼ mile to the south.
Currently, the harbor is in a 5- to 7-year dredge cycle, with the last dredging completed in 2016.

Daily/Weekly
Marina facilities are maintained on a daily basis during the operational season. Restrooms are
cleaned, grass is mowed, and docks and ramps are kept clean and maintained.

Seasonally
At the beginning of each season, all buildings and facilities are inspected and maintained as needed. This
includes inspecting the plumbing, roofs, and parking areas. The mechanical connections that transmit
the lateral load on the floating docks are inspected annually to check for fatigue. The floats are
inspected to insure proper buoyancy is being maintained.

Annual Maintenance Schedule and Cost
Task
Winterization

Cost
$750.00

Painting

$2,500.00

Minor electrical repairs

$1,500.00

Equipment

$2,800.00

Dock repair lumber

$3,500.00

Startup costs

$2,100.00

Minor plumbing repairs

$1,900.00

TOTAL

$15,050.00
22

�Other Annual Expenses
Annual supplies

Tools
Office Supplies

$2,200.00

Bathroom supplies ie: cleaning supplies
Annual Services

Trash pickup

$1,200.00

Weed control aquatic

$4,100.00

Weed control landscape

$1,300.00

Landscape maintenance (mowing)

$3,100.00

Winter maintenance (snow plow and salt)

$3,900.00

Sewer and water

$1,000.00

Electrical utilities

$6,000.00

TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES

$22,800.00

A series of small scale infrastructure and equipment replacements and repairs are needed regularly
to maintain operations at the marina. Costs for these replacements and repairs are outlined in the
tables below.
Minor and Small Scale Infrastructure and
Equipment Replacement
New dock carts
$1,200.00
Bath stalls throughout
$1,300.00
New signage
$5,000.00
TOTAL
$7,500.00

Minor Infrastructure Repairs
Parking lot striping and sealcoating
Lighting upgrades parking areas
Pump out replacement
Shower redesign
TOTAL

$26,000.00
$3,300.00
$2,900.00
$7,500.00
$39,700.00

The floating docks at the Sebewaing Harbor Marina need a regular replacement schedule. As the
docks near the end of their life span, the marina manager will begin working with the Waterways
Program at the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Parks and Recreation Division to
develop a regular schedule for replacing a section or sections of dock at a time. They would like to
avoid having to replace all of the docks at one time. In addition, the boat launch skid piers need to
be replaced every five years.
The marina manager would also like to improve handicap accessibility at the docks. This is due to
the fact that when lake levels fluctuate, the ramping from the perimeter walkway to the docks may
not meet code requirements for accessibility.

23

�Large Scale Maintenance and Replacement Schedules

Project

Year

Cost

Re-roof harbor master, bathroom, and annex buildings
Make ADA compliant parking and sidewalk area surrounding bait shop
Replace or re-deck A dock with compliant ADA ramp due to fluctuation
of water levels
Replace or re-deck B dock
Replace or re-deck C dock
Replace or re-deck D dock/skid piers
Total

2019
2020
2021

$45,000.00
$18,500.00
$235,000.00

2022
2023
2024

$235,000.00
$155,000.00
$91,000.00
$779,500.00

Sebewaing Harbor Marina Dock Locations

C
D
B

A

24

�In its continuing effort to provide quality recreational opportunities for its citizens, the Village of
Sebewaing has developed this Recreation Master Plan as a tool to guide the development of
Community Park and recreational facilities and locations over the next five years. This plan is an
update of the Village’s most recent plan which was adopted in 2014. The plan will provide the
Village eligibility for grants from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to assist the
community in reaching its recreational goals.

The Village of Sebewaing contracted with Delta Institute to assist them with updating the Parks &amp;
Recreation Master Plan. During the development of the plan, three opportunities for input and
participation were provided. The first public input opportunity was an online survey seeking
opinions regarding recreation in the Village of Sebewaing. The second was a public meeting, held
on June 7, 2018. Both opportunities are described in the Community Input section of this plan.
Based upon the existing information and the public input, the village developed goals and
objectives for parks and recreation in the Village of Sebewaing for the next five years. The Village
then created an action program to accomplish the goals and objectives of the plan. The third
opportunity was during the 65-day public comment period and at the public hearing held after the
public comment period.

25

�The draft Village Recreation Plan document was made available for review beginning on July 16,
2018 at the Village Office and on the Village website. This viewing opportunity was advertised in
the Huron Daily Tribune newspaper and on the local radio station. The third opportunity for
community input occurred at the advertised public hearing held prior to adoption of the plan. This
meeting was held on October 15, 2018 at the Village Office.
After the public hearing, on October 15, 2018, the Sebewaing Village Council adopted the Parks &amp;
Recreation Master Plan on November 5, 2018. Copies of the Parks &amp; Recreation Master Plan were
transmitted to the Huron County Planning office, the East Central Michigan Council of
Governments and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources in
of 201_. Copies of the
notification advertisements, the public hearing minutes, and the resolution are included in
Appendix F.

26

����Monday, June 4, 2018

Grants Management
Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Monday, June 4, 2018
Grants Management
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Grantee
Village of Sebewaing - Huron County
Project No. 26-00449

Grant History
GGrant

History
Project County: Huron

Project Year: 1972

Project Title: Sebewaing Harbor and Marina Boat Launch

Grant Closed

Project Status:

Project Description:

$32,946.17

Grant Amount:

Acquire .72 acres. Develop 4 acres to include picnic area, playground equip., parking, boat launch area,
lighting, landscaping, site improvement and comfort station.

Project No. 26-00623

Project County: Huron

Project Year: 1975

Project Title: North Side Neighborhood Park
Project Status: Grant Closed

Project Description:

Grant Amount: $3,023.40

Site improvement, water fountain, parking, picnic equipment, basketball, court, paly equipment, and LWCF
sign

Project No. 26-00817

Project County: Huron

Project Year: 1976

Project Title: Village Park
Project Status: Grant Closed

Project Description:

Grant Amount: $8,864.29

Restrooms/storage building with utilities, site improvements, and LWCF sign

Project No. 26-01023 M

Project County: Huron

Project Year: 1977

Project Title: Village Park
Project Status: Grant Closed

Project Description:

Grant Amount: $8,562.05

Park shelter, picnic equipment, LWCF sign.

Project No. TF89-009

Project County: Huron

Project Year: 1989

Project Title: Sebewaing Harbor and Marina
Project Status: Grant Closed

Project Description:

Grant Amount: $215,300.00

To acquire 6 parcels of land totaling 2.04 acres for future development of a recreational harbor with
approximately 72 boat slips.

�Monday, June 4, 2018

Grants Management
Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Monday, June 4, 2018
Grants Management
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Grantee
Village of Sebewaing - Huron County
Project No. TF92-289

Grant History
Grant
History

Project County: Huron

Project Year: 1992

Project Title: Muellerweiss Park
Project Status: Grant Closed

Grant Amount: $112,500.00

Scope Item:

EDC contingencies
Fishing
platform
Landscaping
Lighting
Public
restroom
Signage
Project Description:

Develop handicapped accessible river fishing platforms, public restrooms, landscaping and lighting along the
Sebewaing River.

Project No. TF03-001

Project County: Huron

Project Year: 2003

Project Title: Village Park
Project Status: Grant Closed

Project Description:

Grant Amount: $36,500.00

Acquisition in fee simple title of 5.5 acres to expand the size of the existing park for parking and park
improvements.

Project No. 26-01762

Project County: Huron

Project Year: 2015

Project Title: Village Park Restroom Building
Project Status: Grant Closed

Grant Amount: $100,000.00

Scope Item:

Access Pathway 6' wide or more
Drinking Fountain
Program
Acknowledgement
Sign
Restroom Building
Project Description:

Construction of a new accessible restroom building in the Sebewaing Village Park that will replace an old and
outdated facility. The new building will include a utility room and concession area.
8
Total Number of Projects:
Total Amount of Grant Given:

$517,695.91

��VILLAGE OF SEBEWAING MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY SURVEY
Thank you for taking the time to answer the Village of Sebewaing’s Master Plan Community Survey! Your responses will help inform the
recommendations and action strategies that will be included in the final plan. Your opinions are vital to the Master Plan process. The survey should take
about 10 minutes to complete and your responses will be kept confidential. Please submit your responses to the Village Office no later than Friday,
February 16, 2018. Please contact Office@sebewaingmi.gov or 989-883-2150 with any questions regarding the survey or the Master Plan process.
1. Are you a current resident of the Village of Sebewaing?

 Yes

2. If you are a resident or past resident, how long
have/did you live here?

 Less than 2 years

 6-9 years

 20-29 years

 2-5 years

 10-19 years

 30 or more years

3. If you are a visitor/tourist, how often do you visit?

 Once a year

 More than 12 times a year

 2-5 times a year

 I have visited the Village, but do not visit regularly

 6-12 times a year

 I am a resident of Sebewaing

 No, I am a past resident

4. Do you work in the Village of Sebewaing or Sebewaing Township?
5. What is your age?

6. What is your main occupation?

7. What issues do you believe are very important to the
future of the Village of Sebewaing? Select up to three.

 Yes

 No, I am a visitor/tourist

 Other:
 I am a visitor/tourist

 No

 Under 18

 25-34

 45-54

 65-74

 18-24

 35-44

 55-64

 75+

 Agriculture related

 Education

 Retired

 Retail/Food service

 Manufacturing

 Unemployed

 Business

 Government

 Other:

 Healthcare

 Student

Access to lakes and rivers

Medical care

Agriculture

Preservation of scenic character

Economic development/job creation

Community safety

Education options

Tourism

Housing choices

Other:

Infrastructure expansion/maintenance
Preservation, protections, and enhancement of natural resources
Transportation choices (walking, biking, bus)
8. How would you characterize the quality of life in the  Excellent
Village of Sebewaing?
 Improving

9. Why do you live in the Village of Sebewaing?

Select up to three.

 Generally good

 Below average

 Deteriorating

 Poor

 No opinion

Born and raised here

Safety/low crime

Close to family and friends

Affordable and quality housing

Like rural living

Recreational opportunities

Saginaw Bay

Quality of schools

Like the community

I don’t live in the Village of Sebewaing

Retired here

Other:

Job availability
10. List the 3 things that would improve your quality of life if they were available in the Village of Sebewaing.
1.
2.
3.
11. List the 3 major challenges facing the Village of Sebewaing.
1.
2.
3.
12. What services/products/new businesses would you like access to in the Village of Sebewaing that are not currently available?

�13. What priority do you think should be given to the following?
a. Attracting more industrial businesses.
b. Attracting more healthcare services (hospitals, senior care, urgent care, primary care physicians).
c. Attracting more retail and other services (restaurants, lodging, legal services, repair services, etc.)
d. Attracting more visitors/tourists.

High





Medium










Low

e. Maintaining existing park and recreational facilities.
f. Developing local walking paths and bike routes to improve access to different areas of Sebewaing.
g. Maintaining natural areas and limiting development.
h. Maintaining quality of housing.
i. Continuing to enforce the blight ordinance.
j. Developing more hotels and motels for visitors/tourists.






















k. Other:







14. What is your opinion of the following statements:
a. The mix of housing in the Village of Sebewaing meets the community’s needs.
b. Adequate affordable housing is available.
c. Adequate senior housing/retirement housing is available.
d. Short-term rental options for visitors/tourists should be allowed.

Strongly Agree




Agree




Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree




















e. What other housing issues should be considered?

15. What is your opinion of the following statements:
Strongly Agree
a. The Village needs a range of residential and light industrial uses

b. The Village of Sebewaing needs more commercial businesses in the community. 
c. The Village of Sebewaing needs to focus development on the tourist industry. 

Agree




Neutral
Disagree







16. What priority should be given to the following to attract more visitors/tourists?
a. Agritourism

High

Strongly Disagree




Medium

Low







b. Camping







c. Boating and fishing







d. Birding







e. Hunting







f. Village parks







g. Other recreation (kayaks, biking, etc.)







h. Lodging options (hotels, motels, etc.)







i. Events (farmers markets, flea market, tournaments, etc.)







j. Other:







k. Sebewaing does not need to attract more visitors/tourists
17. What aspects of sustainability, resilience, and  Clean water
natural resources need to be protected or
enhanced in the Village of Sebewaing? Please  Wildlife and habitat

select up to three.

 Scenery and open vistas

Agree 

Neutral 

Disagree 

 Public lands and open spaces

 Reduce/reuse/recycle

 Quiet surroundings

 None

 Dark night skies

 Other:

18. What priority should be given to the following capital improvements?

High

Medium

Low

a. Drinking water







b. Stormwater/drainage







c. Sanitary sewer







d. Electric







e. Internet







f. Roads







g. Parks/park equipment













h. Other:

_

19. What waterfront recreation would you like to see and where in the Village of Sebewaing?
20. What is your opinion of the following statements:
a. The location and number of walking paths needs to be improved
b. The location and number of bike lanes needs to be improved

Strongly Agree



Agree



Neutral
Disagree





21. What else can be done to improve transportation access to different places throughout the Village of Sebewaing?

22. Any additional comments regarding the Master Plan or what you would like to see for the future of Sebewaing?

Strongly Disagree



�A copy of the survey and results are available online at:
https://www.questionpro.com/t/PDOh5ZbTq6

��Recreational Trails Program Grants
o
o
o
o
o
o

Match Requirement: n/a, priority given to projects that are leveraging additional
funding sources.
Grant Amounts: n/a
Type: DNR applicant. Priority given to projects that align with Michigan Comprehensive
Trails Plan
Objective: To fund the maintenance and development of recreational trails and trail
related facilities.
Application Deadline: June 26
Website: https://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7‐350‐
79134_81684_79209_83740‐‐‐,00.html

Waterways Program Grants
o
o
o
o

o
o

Match Requirement: 50%, can be funded source.
Grant Amounts: 50% of the estimated project cost.
Type: Local Government and Stakeholders applicant. Engineering study, demand
analysis, harbor logs required.
Objective: Waterways Program grants provide funding assistance for design and
construction of public recreational harbor/marina (grant‐in‐aid harbors) and boating
access site/launch facilities. Funds are available for engineering studies and
infrastructure improvement projects at state‐sponsored harbor/mooring and boating
access site/launch facilities.
Application Deadline: April 1
Website: https://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7‐350‐
79134_81684_79209_80306‐‐‐,00.html

Natural Resources Trust Fund
o
o
o
o

o
o

Match Requirement: 25%
Grant Amounts: $15,000 ‐ $300,000 for development; n/a for land acquisition
Type: Local Government applicant.
Objective: The Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) projects provide for
natural resource protection and outdoor recreation. By law, no more than 25 percent of
the Trust Fund revenues available for appropriation each year can be used for
development, therefore the majority of funding is allocated for acquisition projects. Final
grant recommendations are made by the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund
(MNRTF) Board (members are appointed by the Governor) to the state legislature for final
approval.
Application Deadline: April 1
Website: http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7‐
35079134_81684_79209_81657‐‐‐,00.html

�Recreation Passport Grant
o
o
o
o

o
o

Match Requirement: 25%
Grant Amounts: $7,500 ‐ $150,000
Type: Local Government applicant.
Objective: Provide funding to local units for the development of public recreation
facilities. This includes the development of new facilities and the renovation of old
facilities.
Application Deadline: April 1
Website: https://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7‐350‐
79134_81684_79209_81659‐‐‐,00.html

Land and Water Conservation Fund
Match Requirement: 50% of project cost, can be funded source.
Grant Amounts: $30,000 ‐ $300,000
Type: Local Government applicant. Applications are evaluated using established criteria
and alignment with Michigan's Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan
(SCORP). The criteria used to evaluate the projects is Need for the Project, Site and
Project Quality, Applicant History, Financial Need of the Applicant, Quality of the Overall
Park Design, Project
Facilities/Scope Items and Universal Access Design
o Objective: Provide grants to local governments for the acquisition and development of
public outdoor recreation areas and facilities.
o Application Deadline: April 1
o Website: https://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7‐350‐
79134_81684_79209_81655‐‐‐,00.html
Michigan Invasive Species Grant Program
o
o
o

o
o
o

o
o
o

Match Requirement: 10%, can be in the form of cash, donation of materials, equipment
or supplies, staff or volunteer hours.
Grant Amounts: $25,000 min, $60,000 ‐ $400,000 max
Type: Local Government applicant. Projects must support the overall goals of the
MISGP:
 Prevent new invasive species introductions.
 Strengthen statewide invasive species early detection and response network.
 Limit the dispersal of recently confirmed invasive species.
 Manage and control widespread, long‐established invasive species.
Objective: To address strategic issues of prevention, detection, eradication and control
for both terrestrial invasive species (TIS) and aquatic invasive species (AIS) in Michigan.
Application Deadline: pre proposal June 13, full proposal mid‐September
Website: https://www.michigan.gov/invasives/0,5664,7‐324‐71276‐‐‐,00.html

�Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)
o
o
o
o

o
o

Match Requirement: 20% of project cost. Priority given to applications that exceed the
minimum match. Average match is 35%.
Grant Amounts: n/a
Type: Local Government applicant. Application can be done with partner state agency,
local group, etc.
Objective: Fund projects, such as bicycle facilities, shared‐use paths, streetscape
improvements that improve pedestrian safety, and historic preservation of
transportation facilities that enhance Michigan’s intermodal transportation system,
promote walkability, and improve quality of life for Michigan citizens
Application Deadline: n/a, contact coordinator before beginning application.
Website: https://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7‐151‐9621_17216_18231‐‐‐,00.html

Coastal Zone Management Program Grant Funding
o
o
o
o

o
o

Match Requirement: 1:1 match, may be in form of cash, in‐kind services, or donations.
Grant Amounts: $10,000 ‐ $100,000
Type: Coastal Local Government applicant.
Objective: Promotes wise management of the cultural and natural resources of Michigan’s
Great Lakes coastal areas by fostering environmental stewardship through the
development and application of tools, science‐based policies, and effective regulation.
Application Deadline: December 15
Website: https://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/
OGL_Coastal_Program_FY19_Grants_Fun ding_Opportunity_603491_7.pdf

Saginaw Bay Watershed Initiative Network Grants
o
o
o

o
o
o

Match Requirement: n/a, project viability assessed on other funding sources.
Grant Amounts: n/a
Type: Local Government application. 5 focus areas of applications:
 Agriculture and Pollution Prevention
 Communication / Regional Marketing
 Land Use
 Water Resources Wildlife Stewardship
Objective: Balance economic, environmental and social priorities to enhance quality of
life for this and future generations.
Application Deadline: n/a, funds awarded twice per year.
Website: http://www.saginawbaywin.org/uploads/
WIN_Application_Fillable_Form15.pdf

�Great Lakes Fisheries Trust (GLFT)
o Objective – improve or create shore-based Great Lakes recreational
access.
o Must be located on the Great lakes or lower portions of major
tributaries
o Matching funds not required but projects with local funding will be
favored.
o Due in August/September
o www.glft.org
Michigan Coastal Management Grants
o Protect, manage and restore coastal communities and habitats
o Restore historic structures
o Revitalize urban waterfronts
o Increase recreational opportunities along Michigan’s Great Lakes coast
o Applicant must be a coastal unit of government
o Maximum grant request - $50,000
o Match requirements – 50% (some flexibility in match for non-construction
projects that result in changes to local master plans or zoning ordinances, regional
greenways, or include conservation planning)
o Eligible projects
 Studies, Designs and Land Use Plans – must have a direct connection to
coastal planning and/or resource protection.
 Construction – boardwalks, trails, lighthouse preservation, habitat
restoration, scenic overlook, etc.
o Due annually on May 1
o www.michigan.gov/deqcoastal

Coastal Program – Great Lakes – US Fish and Wildlife Service
o Grants to conserve fish and wildlife and their habitats and to support healthy
coastal ecosystems
o Rolling application process
o www.fws.gov/coastal/coastalgrants/index.html
Specific sports and sports foundations


United States Tennis Association (USTA)
o funding for tennis courts and
programs
o www.usta.com

�

Major League Baseball
- Baseball Tomorrow Fund
- www.baseballtomorrow.c
om



United States Soccer
- www.ussoccerfoundation.
org

Safe Routes to School
o For projects near elementary and middle schools:
-Sidewalks
-Traffic calming and speed reduction
-Pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements
-On-street and off-street bicycle facilities
-Off-street pedestrian facilities
-Traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools
o Need to complete the safe routes planning process to apply
o www.saferoutesmichigan.org
Trust for Public Land (TPL)
o

Conservation Transactions
TPL helps structure, negotiate, and complete land transactions that create parks,
playgrounds, and protected natural areas. TPL serves as an independent agent,
buying land from willing landowners and then transferring it to public agencies,
land trusts, or other groups for protection. www.tpl.org

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Nonpoint Source
Pollution Control Grants
o Must be part of a watershed management plan
o Projects aimed at reducing nonpoint source pollution (streambank and shoreline
stabilization, rain gardens, erosion control, conservation easements)
o 25% match required
o www.michigan.gov/deq - Go to ”Water”, then “Surface Water” and then to
“Non- point Source Pollution”.
Community Foundations Private Foundations and Endowments (Examples)
o
o
o
o
o

Wickes Foundation
Strosacker Foundation
Gerstacker Foundations
Huron County Community Foundation
For more complete lists of foundations, search online databases that can be
found at nccs.urban.org or foundationcenter.org

o
o
o
o

Match requirements can usually be in-kind services, donations, or cash,
Most grants are provided on a reimbursable basis.
Barrier free accessibility is usually required for improvement projects,
Multiple partners, multiple jurisdictions can be viewed favorably – think
“regional” projects.

���</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010106">
                <text>Sebewaing_Parks-and-Recreation-Plan_2018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010107">
                <text>Delta Institute</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010108">
                <text>2018-11-05</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010109">
                <text>Village of Sebewaing Parks and Recreation Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010110">
                <text>The Village of Sebewaing Parks and Recreation Master Plan was prepared by the Delta Institute and was approved on November 5, 2018.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010111">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010112">
                <text>Recreation--planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010113">
                <text>Sebewaing (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010114">
                <text>Sebewaing Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010115">
                <text>Huron County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010116">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010118">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010119">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010120">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010121">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038440">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54657" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58928">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/5c0b8bb5dd50e7c5153212bde3d51c37.pdf</src>
        <authentication>849c2921865eca816552d8a274b024ee</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1007646">
                    <text>I

.

-~

.

AMENDMEN,T $

APRIL ,

1983

t

•

~ -·) .:,,

T-HE
DELTA
TOWNSHIP •·,COMP:REHENSIVE
PLAN
.

~

,

1

.

-

....
......

OEL T-A :~ TO:W·N'SHIP
.

\

.-

.

.

.

'- P LANNING

· .

COMMISSION

3'

�•
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF DELTA
EATON COUNTY
DEL TA ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
7710 WEST SAGINAW HIGHWAY
LANSING, MICHIGAN 48917

Business P h o n ~ 627-4037

April 12, 1983

TO:

Owners of the Delta Township
Comprehensive Plan

FROM:

.Comprehensive Plan Review Committee,
Delta Charter Township

SUBJECT: - 1983 Amendments to the Delta
Township Comprehensive Plan
In Jul7' ·of 1982 the Delta Township Planning Commission adopted a revised version of the 1973 Comprehensive Plan. The Commission annually reviews and
revises the plan as necessary in April - of each year. The purpose of this
memorandum is to transmit to owners of the Plan the 1983 amendments. A pu~lic
hearing was held pertaining to the amendments on April 11, 1983 which were ··
subsequently approved by the Planning Commission.

-\~--i~-~

~; :-~

Each page of the Plan which has been revised has the following phrase "This
page revised April, 1983" affixed to the top of the page. In several
instances it was necessary to insert additional pages, labeled "A", since
the revised text exceeded that of the original. The tables and figures _
within the plan have also been revised by inserting the latest information
available.
The majority of the amendments to the text of the plan were necessitated by
the Michigan Transportation - Commission's decision of December, 1982 to reroute
Interstate 69 from •its "original" alignment through Sections 20, 29 and 30· of
the Township to the U.S. 27 corridor. The "original" alignment still appears
on some o.f the maps within the plan but the Generalized Future Land Use Plan
(Figure LU-I) and the map delineating neighborhood units (Figure LU-II) have
been revised. The map illustrating sanitary sewer service areas (Figure
SS-II) has been amended to ·illustrate 1982-1983 sewer construction projects.
Please follow the instructions listed below to insert and delete the pages
within your Comprehensive Plan.

,-:-...

1.

Remove page iii - insert page iii

2.

Remove page 12

3.

Remove page 54

4.

Remove page 66

-

insert page 66

5.

Remove page 84

-

insert page 84

6.

Remove page 85

-

insert page 85

-

insert page 12
insert page 54

' ·~..1r

~

�Page 2
7.

Add page 85A

8,

Remove page 94 - add page 94 _. .

-·9.~ Remove page 95

. :,•

add page 95
::.;· . :rt: , ·. -~

y ~·-, ,

l'Q. Remove page 103 Ll-··add page\ '103 ·\,,. ·

1

,·

•

"-°"'

- ' i}

;-,

105 ·.;,. .add

12. 'Remove page

page 105
• ... /

:,;·

c:

i fi/~51~~~,iail 11~ ,.: -,.l'.

{4 . Remove !)age

j

,

.
-.

•

'

~

~-

",j

,X.J ~- \I

'!.,~·•,

v·,·
,,..____

add'. p'a_ge 121

'

.::·

pige
:

,,'

;.
' ~ 'l ~:

r "' :.

1.28
~i 7 • •R~m9v~ page . 12.8 . - add ·.
' , - ., .- '
. ' . ) ... _ ...
:, t
:~18 . . Remgv~ 'page · 129 · - add page · 129
•••

'
·.•i

:

!

121
'•r

. ,·).···. t

add pa'g ~ 120

-..

e.~ . -:

-J·_.i . :\.'

~,~·-\ J:~.f

,I_·-- -~

-: - :.

120

.l
,IJ

i

., ... t~-: ,;t

f'"

·.~ r ,- .

·....(:1~

~"!

•j.~·- ._..~:

'·:-. '1;,1~·1

··•x
Remove page 1{5 ·.- add ' page ,:.f1'5'" t ,·;.
.,._., =-···:.._,
,·,·=·
:- ·: .,.;?:·':~~,~;{,;; ,:.. ~ "f; ~-.-\.~~, ~~!l"J. ) • ~ •," ·t.' !4 ti~-,&gt;-·:-.}~ .· .. . "~;.

fS.

t• ,.,~~-·

_:..,q. ut •-; ~

l.l. Add page, 103A· ·

'J

'

• \ 9 • • R~m9v~ page_ 148

•

•

1.

-

. ;w ..
•

···•.

~~ J,1!"

,"'

. ~Y. ," :f,.

' ; , _•

.-~-Ei~ :.~-:r~ ~..

'

page 148

·&lt;·~.:

. ,•

, i:
. Si~

\~ .-1_-:.

.- add

page 149
,.,,
-.
. 21. Remove page ~50
.,

••

,

~···:·,,

, :';,/.~ ,. -~·

;: !':;

·,·...

-:.

....

•• &gt;,

,

?t,~·- _,,

,

{;,-:\•i:t'

~· ..; '•·' (,: -~~:fe_--:;:.··.--~:.-~
_,1.. ;

·.. ..,,

c!-dd · page 150

!i1f
_\'1

'

J··•r
\

u/::'•;

: B,~... .:.1 ·- _.

'1:_ : .

·:,• ·.•

,t. , ... ": '. '\

. .:~~; ~ - i;~--✓

a~d, page 149
(.:,::-- (, ,· .

·•:~•

r&lt; ,:

t..\:.·.:.)1"..-'t
~-~.' :j· \u,t-,-:,;
! _,.

..... ,. .
'f. l•,r :,~

;l~,!'{

-t~

¥;_:,\
• . 1.,.•·

22. Remove .page 158 - add page 158
-r·
--~. ..

· 23. Remove page· 161

.,

J

"'.)~-

a.dd page 16(.;

_.,(£ '

:.,·_.-

~24.
...

' ... v_

·••;25. , Remove .,.pagie,

~i··:

C

_H

Remove page rh3 - add page 163

, •;

i

'

,

.~ ,: -.. ·-..-: ., , .·:··;{. . ·.

l:.fx9 :,.;. .add ,page ,i69
s. r·

:~ ,

..:·,

j'

,•,

12 6 •. Remov,e .page 170 ~ =·addf,page 170

~\i;,t . .~ :~

ijr.

':-;-~~ "-~~ ...

' 1

.. J.· ...

• .i'

,:27 .. Remove ,page 172 "" add page 1.71
1:

,...

.: 2s. Remove page 174 - add, page 174 ,
'. 29. Remove page 176

add page 176

.

r·

.. ..
,

:.:

.•

.!.

.,

'!i .... :_~J:)·

30. Remove page 179 - add page 179
)1. Remove page 180 - add page 180

,r •J.;~

.....

·./~. · -~t 1

&lt;,,, ._ ... •:,, , l:.
·. ,. ',:-~ . I ,.-- t:i ·. ·- -~:(:,·
We woul'd ~adv-ise., you to update your ~plan upon;;,;-ec¢ipt gf ih~ at..t~died ' ·revisions.
If you -ar:e missing a page(s) please contact the t)elta Townsh:£'{)0P.l.anning Department. Thank you for your cooperation

MG/aw

•

�•
,.
•

Y'

CONTENTS

-J·

- ·:':" ..,

. ·- .

®ALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHE?i~iVE P~

I.
II.
II!.

.., .

IV.
VI.
V!I.
VUI.
LX.

'CoimnuniJ:V Goals :• • • . . .
" Residential Development,.,... . . . • .
. . .
C.o ~er-cial Development . ~
. . . • . • . ., .
. ·. .
Iadustrial Devel.opment ..• •
, . • • . •
• :: .
Community Facilities and Services. ,. •. • . • . • -~ -")i
Tr.µ:isportation Facilities Developm~t {; • ·, • - ·.-- . , .. . .
_O p~ Space and Recreati6n Facilitiis; ·D~velol)mei,.t ) • . .
·.. , ·.. , -~._•: . . ,. ..
En.e rgy . . . . . • , • .
• . ·,.. ;,· .~?·:
·nie Environmen.t.
. . . .
,. ,.. . . • • . . . ' . .
?"2.1::~ -

GEOGR:A:PHIC D~ERMINANTS • •
I.

II.
'III.

IV.

v.

vt.
V!I.
VUI.

IX.

:,;. _·· i.;~·i;.:

, "' . :--·';

1
: -: • •

~:s ~

: " ,; · •

• '

/

•

t_ • "'

,

•• I

•

•

•

of
in-

. ·. .

.J-::

. . . . .:;.,-..
~

., ·.,

8·
,·
•g-

~

17

..
.
..... ·-. .
,;-

•

· -~

,· .•. . • • • io
sq s. . _.. ':L'. ~ .
-· .
·12

-~- • -6 ~
. . . . . . . . · . -~
,,' . • ' . ' .'' ;.-.,:; 1
- _'.j

\' ~

:: :

3

i+

~1

-~'"1 .:

. ., ..

: : : 1"

4.

&lt;~ s.

,:o~L·:t
,, .- . '~·c..::::,/i
. .. .

. . . . • -:, • . .

I

.

. 19
·- 19

. ' '"'
' ,

-

24'

~

Po~ulation Growth in Delta Township.
~opulation Projections

..

• • • • • -~. · ~:- ~:· -• • . 24

• .d""-.. •

• ·- • · •·~---,. --·~~-:; --··r~ ..•

:,

..

COMMERC.IAL BASE ANALYSIS • •
I.
II.
III.

,'

. 3 ~· ; ' · • • •
'·,.:- \ · : -·: · . .
-)

;.rr· .-~~ . .

Pbl&gt;tlt.ATION ANALYS,IS AND PROJECTIONS.
.......
II.

!1

1
1

•

.
-~
. ( ~- . • .
. . !'\ · ". •r\

..- ·.. ·.r ~ ~ • s • ci~~r

L.9 cation of Del ta , Town$hip
:· ' : •
Histor;ical Growth of Delta Township.
c·1_1mat.t" ·\ : ~ •. ! • • • : • • • • •
· Geology , and Topography . . • . . • . }.~ ~c •
Soil . Conditions , in Del;a Township • . • •
Ground Jil'ater • , · • • ~ :
• .J~{ -.
~urfac~~- Water. . . . . .
. . . . .
Ws.tip.g ) Land Use fatteX'Il,
. . • .• •
Delta Township : .Land us f Trends (1972.:::1980)
'

.

= ;, .- ....•.; ..-

. :, •'!

· c ~~ ~

'.·-:'

I.

_1 ~ .

r

PAGE

."

~

32

._ ;:.

Ch;a.r.a_c;-teristics of Existing Commercial Developmen-:t: .3;:. ,:~ ~~ - ....,-:- ~.: • . - 34
PT.oj.ect:i.¢!n of Future Commercial Development:. · . ·, .&lt;· .. · • .,.. , . , •• ~36
Major ,.Findings of ,the Commercial Base An,~lysis
..s ·::•.&lt; , ;,.•,:.·:::...a . i.\51

INDtJSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS
I.
II.
III.

Analysis of Delta Township's Existing Industrial Base.
Project~on of Future Industrial Development
Potential .
. • .
.
Conclusions • .

OF'F!GE SPACE':.ANALY:SIS.

,:

I.
II.
. , ·IX-I:.

52

55
.- 60

61

Office Types . ix?- Delta To~ship
Office Deyelopmen.1; Trends. . .
O~'t:erminat::~on, of ,. Del_t~. Township Office Space

61
61

__ ··Market •·; . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64

ii

�,

·;

66 '..''•
·.'••
-,

66&lt;:

66
72
72
74
74 .
74 .

76 '.
76
76
84
85
86~,:
88f'
90·'·
90:'·
90 ~

95 .
98,:
\

'
101 .
1o'Jr
1-09
109 :''
1©9'', .

UL

lH
- .
•.'

SOLID WASTE ............................. 1 .......... ·• · . .'., , . · ·. 1 ~.i .,_ •-1~ ; -. 114
.
'\.
.
.-,,J T . .;;,.r-;;:,. 1 iS
1
-FUTURE
1.AND USE
j • • • • .-!., • • ·.•.- t· \,, ~;.i .,_. .. t i ~..
.
s:~ - •
' .
~.
. . .l' ,a,! :.:1 ~,j\::, \
,. ·,. · _:I· It_......
th~ Relationship ~~ ., Pl~~g ' F~ Zoning .. : •••...• ,-,~·~it:!? •,l :'"
~!!sidenti~~ Development., •...•.. ~-, .. _.• ..•. .•..••.. - ~l · b,'!'!/'l.-·, :· _
·
h.. · II!.
R~s.idential Neighborhood Module Cqncept .•.... ,. .• ,... ..i ••• ,,-fr '.'. 123
F' :. IV.. •·
,,
·. - ' '. , . ~
124
,_; - ·i ..
V. _•.·· -~etgh?orhood _Unit Delineation~_r.,;; ! , ~ ••_, ,:. •, • •. • •. "'M. ~cd.!!,;t~:"&gt;F' , .{so.i
9J;fice Development ... , ..... , ••........ ~ ... ._ .. !- •· l" •, •·.,-iJ ·"-r tJ. . _
'T.• ,,,,,.-i,,;;TI .-1_
... ~
• .
\
.,
152;·
v
CouiuJ~rcial De':7elopment ._. ·.,.:. ·:r ••••••• • • • , • • •-Ir • t:--,r :1iJi 1 • • t•,n ,· ~ ·i:;s· ·
1
7
·• V'tI -':
Industrial Development ...•.................. • . • , • . • • • • ~,·. •Ji,.,· ·
1
V'III. _ Parks, Open Space and RJJ;eation . Faciliti~s , ... _' • i :-J".Wi.~;.·
,;;;: - r .. '""ne:7elopment .... i,, : ••••••• ; ••••••••• ,, •••••• : •• ; ·~: ~ ,.,,:-,:.;~J.~~nA: i~~
:·•
IX.
Prdposed Thoroughfare Improvements~ ............ ~ .. ~~--.- ... -.
X.
Co1lDID.lnity Facilities . ................................. • • 1'61
•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

• ,; . •

·~ •

•

•

•

•

•

•

• !.

•

•

!

tJ:'·

",)

·•··

I

.

A

iii

,

•

•

.

•

•

�~I

•

-- ---

f , ~/ f;·: -

' I

This page was revised April of 1983

GEOGRAPHIC DETERMINANTS
.'/:~tJ. . ·

Location of Del ta Township

oc\',: .- . .

changes. are likely to take place· within· the community'; · 'Lo·caticfo. of·- a· com--

The location of a community is an influential facto:r ."91~- ,i,P.9-i'c_a tor of what

munity in relation to major transportation facilities an.d -employment _
centers will bear directly on · the- likillh6od · of-igfu~'h&lt; ttithin::..the com.munity,-;.i:·•· ,. ~;· ,.
.., :_~L:_~:~l-¼: • · ~'a_,,,.... , . ;:. .:·~
.
,.. ......
::· ;, ., ·,;.,.. ·::..._·'\,. +~ ··;t · r·.,: . , J; _· • ~-• . ........ ·_
-~"-~~-,
Situated, within the -· :r..ansirlg Tti:..{:ount~'feg'i oni"/ ' DE!-~' Tot.ip.s!:i:if"has experi,en~ed . rapid growt~ ~ince 196?·· . ·· Thisi. ~i'J#'.eit:' : .~~: ~': ~:13,\ tribuJ:ef . .to the Town;..
'·, . .
. . .ship~ s . close - proximity to maJ or.-.emplayn1e11.~,;;e;:e_erttet-!§if'·'Such · a~., th.e Stat;e
.Government -and . the Oldsmobile · lndustr.ffa!L ',:Cdltlplex;Uiit : ~eil ' ~f~Pelta Is stra•· t~ r::
,tegic , loeation in relation to the ; tlicers~dt~ -:;fiigw;f:_01 i~wof;'1L \::· Major
c:c 1':. .r.outes providing direct service · to•; tli~ :.T-6~sh·i p'a'fe"i:1.'f':...96, Ifft. 96" and US 27.
i'- (1\'
E~is~ing and pr~posed .. :reeways: ~~~e ;gi~~1\_
:f~~eit::-~; 11: ·fxpari~~~ -, ~f c·omm:~rce
.wi-thin Delta's indust-rial sectOl':f . espec1Jia-l1¥" w:f:tlY~lect t:o.-maJor freight .-, .
: f . .carriers, -and the warebousirtg distrtbution;,.::sec-td-r,:&lt;· · -::_J.£. ·
.!...1. ... '
..

,..

1. •

f" ( ) ( , :

88(

.

, .....

- ~.~~'i :·

.-

-'.•'\•_:·.1_·l(;.-;;o_:'-::;c~. .'i··;_f_' ,.,,

!l'he ·Grand 'l'runk Western Railroad"·(GTWR:R) traverses tJie 13~.ut:h~_a s.t ern quadrant of the Township, paralleling. US 2-7-. · The GTWRR "O,jf~ra1:;e.s'...~a::r~~j;or rail
switching yar.d .· in Section 25, further ccfmplerilentinf ~.iil s~rvic~s to the ,
Township
. •"' ~ :r. .• ....r "· . · • .
.

•

:,~ ~'\'_•,:"

ev·

-

.'

, -·

- .: :_ ;.. . ,,..:&gt;~=-fl •

• . --

Capital -City ·Regfonal' Airport ·-is i!J'la·t ·~i one-b~fif ni:Ll\{:,k~~tfi~isi;, of Del ta
1'owns~~P. · Waverl-y Road and. Grand R~ve:f'"A~enu.( Et;,~v~i ~-~r~.:~t~~cess-.,,tb -.
the airport from the Township. Capital City ~~4,;rp9rf: pt~v.iaji_ft.. ,~lte~uled :. ,- .
commerc-i·al ·ai-r passenger ·and air freight serv:i'ces
as ··w~,ll"a51 charter ,
. . .. - .
flights for both passen~e.rs -~nd air. _f rJ.:!:~f,1· .,,.,;·~--: .,:;- _·:·• .

~·'?:;., :;: :_.

-~ -

;~~.i~~a~l~•,.· 'the--L'an~~g- at'ea:: arid._. De-l~i"-,:j~s~1~:J~e -~~8~nqmic .iinks throughout- the· East North ·Central , 'P,dttiort' 'of fhe uniti'a'' Sta-i:¢~ ~ . This {highly in,dustria.l'i:z-'ed ' ~region.:"is directly depenci~t upon".""the hig°h\..;3.y and·. rail systems
fo.r - d•i stribution of fini'Shed and semi-finished produc.~!':. t-f..Ra18fj)e:~fl. This
fact further contributes to the economic viability of ··_t:fie :4:~~g :'-area :due
to its favorable location · with respect tb major highway. and ·rail . facilities.
Del ta Township, as evidenced by r.~gure GJ~ I ., .., ~jpr,~- ~:..,pi:efe~}ed posd.tion
within· the· Lansing ~etropC?litan Ar·e·a .with res_~ec_t ,:t 'p .., ~~~ess-: ~~ ~highl&gt;lay and
rail ·· facilit'i-es. ·
.. ..r
·
-~-,
-,.
.,.r'- - -·
.. ,- ...- _
-

f!,•

(::•.. ~~ .- !~n:-

~

~, ::J..

:~

Historical Growth of Delta Township

;: ~.:

The history of Delta Township can be traced along three lines of development. The first is the founding, growth and withering of G~and Riv-er City,
t.t.'. a1s·o known as Delta Mills. This line of . development began 'i n t"he 1930 's
reached its peak in the 1830'.s a~d 1890'~ anq. _subsequenflY terminated.
&amp;t, The second line of historical developm~nt in De+ta Townspip can -also be
'1i~ traced · from the 1930' s with the foundi~g ~bf scattered farm.steads . distriG,~~0:· buted throughout the cTo~ship but . primari:J,y on ,secti~_n. . ~~\les . .: · this line
,:,.,_,;,:,..,_ of" development continues today as a '·signifii;:a~t prol'9rticm of ~- Township
-~&gt; land which · is · actively ·used for · agricultural purpose$ ! ; ·,'n'elta :.1\&gt;.wnship 's
~-t } third . line of historical development c~~enced in th~ '!t9)0 's 'wfien the
·' :(:· · eastern portion of the Township began tq be developed a.ii .a subu:b of
-- of development - was dependent OIJ. .the. growth
.
Lansing. This line
of the
),\.l Lansing Region and did not greatly accelerlte until 'a fter 1945 .

~-

.... ·d)

',

....

','

12

of
1n-

�.

..

.
FIGURE. GD-I
LOCATION OF DELTA TOWNSHIP IN THE
1RI-COUNTY REGION

~

,,

.~

'I•.:?
•

!"

. \•

-, _}

.

Li

f [.
,'I.

•

\il"(. - 11 .;,

I:

&lt;.- /;

...:·:ti.r.\" -:. •

.s'°... ,· . •.:

-~ -:.f

i.J.•

,l ,.,

/Hf ,:~:,

1

~

:,.~\·

: ·' ;: :1' :!

"'

•~'

,

\-'-"(

,•+;;..it~\.,:

_i,-'°

A

• ~ ; .. &lt;:'~

11)~:,;i-.. · ~

'::,l

.-.-f}··, ~N•

-:~fJ

".

I,;,.

~-:£

'f t '1-1 _.~_.v;J.:_

~/r. .:...{, t "Jr~

\.

. .~.~'.1'";1.fL1•1, d '1~.A10"1 '1~~
"'

!

+:-:_

1·: '••,'

fJli:

J,

1 -•

,!''\/'II.: ~"";fl'~

~~~...,.

ti

:';

.c:..~.i:,a:;.;_,

I ••

.-

#

r ] ~;.!.7"': :'1
•

L::;.;.-....Ji----1-.,..- ....1.--.....L--...J.....l_....i-_ _....,._ __.
F'MK ·_;

:

nu.r: ~bta•o'i

lf!;.. ,
.. '• 5:+.) ~ &amp;t: ! .. 2

a 11:n:)

:,r..~J. ::- 'I\J~"

o•;m.:;-:Jt,_:.

$. ....,, \

-t&gt;'V

&lt;o,

it

l~ ! t~-- rl .:-·-$
!.~'.?:;) (,

:-

.. ':

:..r-tv}~~ ;. 1!!:,.fi~Hl-h ,. i:t

0

Set-t-1::em~nt of the Tr1..:.:.cpunty ' Region along with most of the rest of lowef ., ,,
Michigatl was ~ostponea · by tfi~ erroneous Tiffin report of 1815 which d-i~\~(l.: J
settlers ±-o· focliana, Ohio ~nd Illinois. Subsequent survey and exgloratiGP. ....
work cond,ucted under the direction of Governor Cass correct!!;1" ~~~~?~~~fcr' ...
by the 1~30' s south central Michigan and the Tri-County Reg;o~~'1~~~-,alf-i!ct;--"'~
ing setflers interested in both lumbering and farming.
~-- J•· -··•V• U;\ _-,j:,.JH, .
..
. ,
~I-·
.
- 1·-·
,.1."'r··· '::";,. . ~,-s::~
.
,::;;;Q."'! "".
J&lt; ~;;:
~-~ :;;'..,.
~ l~ •
.
.
...:
Tne first settler · of the Delta Mills area was Erastus Ingersoll 5titl6"pdt'~,h~~~d ·
BO&amp;fa-e-rJ§
the Grand ' '.River: Ingersoll and others had comi .f8 ~ tH~ 1 i,e1tJ H°"',.,,
Mills area in search of a site for an educational institution to be modeled .
a.f°ter Oberlin College. However, their plans for the Grand River Theo~gidM,;.;
Seniiriary we~e da~he,4 by_ the financial crisis of 1837-38. In , :~~,.me~~t£-Wl} 3'.: :.
Ingersbll built a 's«:3-wmi.U and · began lumbering operations. An , I8A6 ~~U~r ~t
·
1
authored by a resident of Delia Mills indicated that pe6ple d.m~" f ~dfil ·;':~.I :. ·
twenty miles away to have their flour made. Del ta Mills cbt\.'htiued ' t3s• d~v~1St§
1
throughout the latter half of the 19th century at ~vhich time it reached iJ:s
peak population of approximately 300. During the 1880' s and -l-89G~-s-.. ~.¥i~. .2:.~
Mills was served l'.iy Methodist·· artd Congregational churches, three blacksmit;,hs,
-:· ~' ,&gt;· re·~(:, 1 ; c$
three grocers, two masons, one cabinetmaker, one carpenter, one painter
·
and one paperhanger and two physicians • . Manufacturing activities inc).uded .. .
were fabrication, cigar wrapping and furniture building. Socia:i~-l~a~..4t~i-s ·
time centered around the churches and the Grange Hall which attr~c~ed bqth ,
local residents and farmers from the surrounding country's id1':·.~.H1 r·,' .,._,, ·'."\': ;;:_: :.:
t
: .. ,,n.:.:. ~ ,a:'~,,\ ,,, .i ). !:)'."• ·•·

!ft~:

on

,

.

t :.., ..

Farming activities throughoQt Delta Township must have commenced about the
same time that Erastus Ingersoll was founding Grand River Coi':t-y-:: .a~a=:.:.btl:iidI/ij,-.:;;~
his lumber mill. However, it was not until 1844 that the State _Legisl~tur~ ,,
acted to officially establish Delta Township whose ter.r ito.riei§~~n t1~f'dk~ •·•,',
·,off from the eastern portion of Oneida Township. Tax toli-s : if?1844''' incffe!l tif
twenty-six residing in the Township.
13

'
'

�This page was revised April of 1983
'J \.

·.,

firms carrying on operations outside the Lansing Metropolitan Area. With
the e~ception of the General Motors Parts Dist_]:'ibution Center and Meij er
Distribution Center, firms enga,ging ir-r dis·tribation activities employ
relatively few people in th~ir local operations.

I

During the 1970' s a significant number··,;-£ -new industrial firms, the majority
of which were associated with distribution of materials and goods, located
in the industrial tract. This trend ;suggests th~t the location and access
characteristics of the industrial tract are highJ,.y desirable. Typically,
firms providing connnon carrier and freight transportation services require
highly accessible locations ...to- both metropo-.litan , and regional service areas.
/1.

-~•=,,,.-,. .-r,..lt, ~

':),~i.i~--- ~ ~~:~ - ,~......:: ~ - · - ~ - : : - ~ ~,...

I

.

MAJOR BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS LOCAtED IN DELTA TOWNSHIP's INDUSTRIAL TRACT
•..

'L

I

l

, , !'

Construction and Related Activities ·

·.~, . &lt;'

Distribudo'n

ti ,_ ,t. J. ·.: . . 1 J.
Ameri-Cel Structures Inc.
Clark Foundation Company
Douglas Steel
Alvan Motor Fcreiglit
Jacklin Steel
---Assoeia-t ed · Truc1C1.lines
T. R. Noyce Construction Company
Blue Arrow Inc.
Bruce Cartage -- .......... Rieth-Riley Construction Company
Shreve Steel Company
' - · _, ~- ---- ··-- . -· .,_ . ~ --·-eentral TransporF'.t nc.
Tom's Asphalt Paving Company
Interstate System
Transcon.: Lin.e s
_ '~ ,:_. .xr..:':;;,1~.J-;.::;.; ~-·
. 'r. T~c~,e,r .,Fr.e ight, W:µes,.E,,i&gt;' ¥~:·~:,;.,
. , ' :· - United Trucking Se;i;vic_e /::- ~.. · .·· , , .
I,..

'&lt;-

......

:

~~

Truck Rental
-.

I

Manufacturers Service Corporation

~:~t~ttf;~~~~i~~~P#iP~~,-

~) i:- ·.: - ..

•

:;: s~. , _
::! ..... : I ~ ::- Sf
~
(' •'.

'

.-~ :

~"~(,..:.

·'., 1

- ~~fi~~~~{~~-: :. v

~a-Cola , Com-.pan~y·. : ,,.- c,,,,,,. '":: sr .}p:s?
Coe
;J_"'."
Gen~.r al Motors Parts·- Distr;ihution Center
. Hi-Kl.iis Beverage
. Lani;;Lng Storage Company
.~ 1 :,-,
:,Meij'er Distribution Cen't,ef::~ , ~
Jtey~ns Van Lines.
, , . _. H

Gr~in Elevators

:_,:-! •,,_'._

l,

·:..··

...

/

·

t:?-. :. ,r ·:· .; .:i :· r ~ ~-- · •
Detroit News Printing, F~~ility
Oldsmobile Diesel Engine · Plant
ii~.,;~-

.ff~ ..~

l~ ; ,

::~.~l 1.&amp; ei1-fl. ~
-r.r .r , ·!:&lt;dO :r;,:t'i.1;,

(

HeaYY,

,,

Atlas Truck Rental and Leasing ·
Keena Trµi;l&lt;. Leai;i~g, c,. ::;~n . d ~.c·T
:'Ryde,r _Try:ck Rent;il . a.;n9 ~~i;ln'.gJB
Others

•'11

.

~-JY,.:..~_c. ~:-~ •·._r., . ·,~~r -

Millett Elevator Company
Rals,ton Purina Company
Miscellaneous

Utilities and, Railroads

.......
,..
,,. A-1 Auto Parts
•· .. . .. r:i.
_,,_ Canteen Services
.
r:
.c
. Tony M's Lounge/B~ldwin's Party $tore

54

•

�I
:

Industrial Tract

';../

.

,

"! /

_•f:

'')_.,

C

1-80:)

;.

~~:

.•.,.

' '

Du'r:ing the t970 '"s, -Delta Township attracted a ::i ~ignificanE' ii~~~~~rr··~~ .:, tndus-trial warehousing :firms. J~ 1 5~~ 1i-12:;}9JJ.:i P7Eiod, ~ppr~Hf~InfE.5:t)fq ~Z 1QOO ::
square -fee·t of ma:nuf ac turin-g-·-s-p-a"C"e · was- ·constrm:te"d in tire- ·"Towush1p. - ·Dur_t,?.~ :,aPRF.P~fmat~J.r. EW0 --li4 1 H9n::; 9qu~~TT· !~~t 9b.r~fffJP 0 hl·~fng
t:!:;-;:,t~/-~c@1Z&gt;"f&lt;iS =~~£'B:-S 1:~c ~-P: :-: In , .t~~ ~• lf1te_11~9 70 '.s ,, t9e {8~t?~~~~c,ffl-J8f ~ P,Ji8~ ~c ts
tl:un . -~{}~ ipsfus f H&lt;?-1.!_p,ac::,t _: -~ 014s¥1?b +t~ :l!gn;:r~~g~r
2:a~~~d:2~~~--ni~:te,q w;1-_
·..:. -:~~y.,e:.::,:&lt;t~99P,-J-~_90R. :~quar~. .Hef) , -.. ~~e,~ Gep~~~i :r~BEBrl? ,~a.5;s . '1ti1feq~}tt3e 0 ~~~~--~~,J,;~f2_i9:99. s.q pare J~e_;), ,~ij~J; ,Har:d lfp~ij. D¼Sf[iJ:&gt;~F.t8~ ~ll~'tdit:g .)~15,;
L~filt,,w~~F~_:f~e _tJ •:. C~5raTCola W~i:eh&lt;f\l~e cr85 ·~99. -:.?~M~~e,J~~&amp;~·tf.l-n~srliP~ J:?~troit
.'$J~~~tp~g. p1cili;y (30,000 ~qu~re ....feet) . ._., ~,, ,£.9 _ c;·,,.,~Hj o.:: J::i.l .(;

;f:.~ J-Nt~:&lt;~.c\mji

7

0

. S::--'£&gt;;-' ..~~- ·~ /).,:i _JJn ......

~

,.

-1

l,

l

c:"':;

rif ..1.-:

~;-;J J

-~

~·-0 :·q Or!,L f. 8f:;

II ,, P_roje·c:t_:i,on of Future Industrial Development Potential
\

-

: ; .. ;' .._

•

u•

-:

fl•'c-1

;J: ~--t-1.:fff.-:- _ :-.:: --_: -·

•

..

·\

'f•...

, ')A!t ~fly~j,_~; _a nd projecti~n
'. "['D~~~?-?P;t:ff:- ~c,~en_tia_l w~ll ge

· .

•;

~1':1

r.

~~

-'

~~-:~

;·~ t,.o .".1S2

sF '.'

of industrial, w,a r~housing and, :dh~f?,~gu;fgri
carried,: eut in. four".xflfrPS •. -¥i~s
g£i;~~~~on
:/l;'m' :',~t3-M,, ?,J,.rr-?:i:F~_ct~d _to,. ~h~ overall ,. s _tructure ,1?!' lie~ ;I,,aq~in~1:) 'ri-:;-hg~_H : ,.
-.,,;,.1-gr)~e~Jii-'«.:- ~c.09-omy . , •. ~~cq~~ly, c9ns~defation, will -~Er g~ven .: ~o ._, ;l)R~vu~H~cial
.;£..;_ 'f..~J..fl)ff...~ --of . tJ:!~ Tr,1.:901,1n~y eFono1Ilic st~ucture _w~ich are i,J?pri17Ptflt j fo£
_· fP~JJlii.~J-.., ,.wa,li~hou~~ng and dist,ribuJ:ion econ~puc po;en til?-t~ J ·19iffibY.,
::Jl.~~~¥-f'.J-/ e,mp_loyment (t;rends in i~dus tria1 Fand wh9.l~salin~-:, tr~9-~~c-1¥iH! rbe
. _,__ 1 , aj}~}i?r~4.· ; )?inally,, _ projec_::,;~ons . 9f future Tri-Co4R.tY , !t?&gt;dlf~Jl,?r~h,, ~n£Li,s
_., ?' ;-7b?.f.~~~ling em-g:1,oyme1i1 t wip. be J,Ui 7sen t;~d1 and analy,zed '.)~n ordEr;t_;!) fgJ ~Er~
. te,r m1n~ :, f;1:1ture developmen~ __ potenfial _for .• ~el _t~ Towgship • . :'·:W " , , J i !''.,;~
Tri-County Regional
Economic Structure

fii

.. ;,_.

~,- ·.•; .

,.,._

_______
thi-e~ . k~}'- .r+r1¥.~Ef~:
. .

_,_
.'.:..?.. flC.t j ,::.-!1L··1

Tl7-e ec9ro'!_IIY of the ~ri-County Reg:i,,o n is based. upon
. §1.~~te g.ov~i:.-pment, higher educcj-tion and ~ptom_pbile m:=3-n1:1;~cf_lf.r .i pgJ.sif.:1~ying
fm ; ~:PJ,l!;)IDY ba~ed on three such diversi~Je4 rJemenp, ,~aE~b~n.e .5}t~grJt1e
Lansing. area. in terms of economic balance and stability ,F~_
i!-t(1I18·¥td 9 p-p,t .
be possible in a more narrowly-based economy. Furthermore, this econ.oin?-c_
s .J:r~ctur.Er, has enabled t~e Lansing tfetropolitan Are-r, .$-9 ttl,&lt;f:? ~ff?~~!,=P.~~ of
n5_t1on~l growt~ trends in the three ker, e~oY.?1:lic sec,tor~ " Rts ,qO;YftrnW~?-t ,
,•J._e~uc~__tipg_..,~n~ f:ndustry and thereby evolv~ .~s ~~e ee::,o nemic-- nv,e ~fmc~i:i,.t ral
,~a,._cJ:i-1_1~an,:_, dur2--ng the post World W&lt;fr, Tw&lt;J . p~_riod.
"J,.:·:· . .,i".',.,:,~":&gt;'i:
Features of the Tri-County regional economy which have a bearing on the
potential for future ind us trial development are primarily related·_ to the
- skills and expertise which exist within the Metropolitan Lansing . Area.
·.,

55

�I

•

U
This page was revised April of 1983
TRANSPORTATION
,-

. :; ..

'

'

.\ '

The 9bjectiye of ~he transportation network is to provide essential -s ervice
~'dt:"fn '· mo~in~ :,nahicles throughout the Townshi p~ . prov idej tonveiiient . a c~~•~s-s to
·:.:;, ]tiv~;~~l?r&lt;?f larty aii~ ·a1i6~~efficien1r ·wot ~, · ~~9pplh~ J~iitl~ ie; s~i-ia"'t ~ ! ~vehicle
tt·it&gt;~: · Jnie · stteet n~twork~ is ·t he tfio§t ' sbph:i.sti~Sl~ed i ana J developea- ~element
·;;, t,:f ~th~ 0 tr·a.tf~~6rtati8ri- system':· Other d~ent~ 5 inc1hcie th-e public '--'t ;;,i:i~sit
~~~ €~*~\ Gpe~ated 1:iy&lt;thi!· C-:ipita~ A:ea- 1':tans~6!~at:i &lt;:&gt;rl Aut'fi~ri~( j ·:\ c~T{f.?' and
i--,;~;': · ·~ tort~:C¢tihty- Transportation , Autf1or1ty (EATRi\N) ·, :fu:;nLmoto;-ized ":-:faq:t'.f:f;:~~es
'idewalks ' and: bi~e~~ys .! . and ,·a} ~P~r:t . ~ncf_
:_s'erv,~~~es_,_;- ~ f\uding
,-~ -~ ·pase ert:~~r -' ~hd:· frei~ht carugi.
· _,, ,_.
-• .,·· -.~ · "' 1-· )-{fl ..

.·
_
·- :.&lt;~iic~~~ltlf s

';:·1

\_=-- I.\_:(,~

.

_

.,JL .1

•

rail

li.1

•.e,-, .. _r-;~:

~;r~ !':!

..

·.;•

•_/,,·

jJ __ :. ~; . . .- ._.

The transportation plan element ot' the C&lt;;&gt;ptP~.e.~e:,1:s~v..,e, f.\~~ _prp v t ~:e .~ ,~n,
analysis of each facet of the transportat'i'on ) -y~t~nrt:;:v~g' t 1fo-ottf1~{on to
fuel costs, increased government emphasis on pu111ic · tr'afisit: r~feNlce and
non-motorized facilities.
1

·:..~.:rift.

~ ~

-, r_,

~1-:? dm 1 :1

:; ;

.-..i..

. t~. ·.:

:

~- - _'Hi~totiB.~~f D~velopm~nt of th~ Str~~t ,system
-·"';",.

,.'..~i'.':,t~

• .., l.I cl.t w l.,,1..,

- "•-

L ,, J r~~l ...

•

. •.·

... . :.

.

!.'.: • . - ..

l.!r--~

'!

1

r-· ~· '"f.. ~ ~

.·:.... -: __gt~ ~-~,1JIJ

:'e:·~·-· :- ,.:..,. •, :;~l ''~P.:\'.!:~L-,:~

. . ,.,).,?:'
.,'"·'·;v_rr.Eif ·)5; -~-~:fal ..p:ysr.;_r,i::

', :111e Ji l §~ing thoroughfare ·patt-ern 'of beita1 Township :t ii e'v'g1)1~d'. p·r ': Hnnily
":-:: } 1:~~:: tw~ ~ff~s~f.- , ~igh~ay devel_o l'ment: fa:ct6rs. : . F~rst ,-, the_~i~} ¥i~cPJ~%d
pi:i:~terrt"'evident · in the Township - re~iects· development crl,'farg- s~l:!'ti'ort"-'_fines
. : wfi:i.c:h9 fl~~i!: ofltk'" to' the t_iih'e teentli · century survey of' 't:}1J11 N~;r'th.'&lt;vest 'Te~ ri·. ·, '-: '. t:6-ry'.r;.1.&gt; '.fh:ls p8:1icy r of " provitiing·· acce~s ~utes= along -s~c:tior( ·fitfes -fif1a~
-}-,:':,:,::1 i:i.\: c:hhes rrprodi:i~ed seemingly · arbitrary road alignment , pat·tertts1·:.~i!t::1:l-q_[~,:_
spect to natural features. However-, tonstruction of secri'on ·i'ilfe1~foa'.ds
has also provided reasonably good access to all points within the . State.
1

:-

.. :1

--·--· ·.!._· ..

. ,_~,.:-.'-~ ~~-?~~--~~- ~~

~-

•·

The second basic highway development factor which had a great impact- on
'.'oh~t: ~hot bnghfare patte:dr bf the Township is the Federal Int"erstcite i:ilid
f.: ::fleteiisl( .Highwi:i.y Program-. : The program is aimed ~t' developing_ i-d:g'ff''ripeed
effiei~tft transportation links between maj orr centers of econom·f 2 iln'po·rt~ce
it: 1 'tliroilg&amp;dut the country. · Ini· Delta Tbwnship, tw3 interstate ~h'ilhwAys" ':':finpose
a ':' strqflf new pattern over the ·old gr.i d configuration. A north:..$l,\£t1 iG.~seg:
meri'
the·
and west"_hi'
. ' .....t:-1; 6£ .;: . ...Int·
. . e rstat.~
• •96 'tiivides
' •·~,. . . -..To~ship
,. into east
.
·; '~- =· : .: i vjY:"'
C\-, .
·. · Inj:efstate ' 496 divides ' the eastern half of the Township ~ ·to n'C&gt;'rth'.e~1rt
andrisoutl:ieast '· quadrants. These J existing interstate highways f&gt;'r'ov.\ if'Ei'.·'
e:ffitlen£ 1 connections to downtown Lansing as well "''tis
other.·ma_fo'):- reifficient connections to doWntown Lansing' as well as to other major economic
centers of the state and nation.
~

"'1("

... ·....,

to

II

'l.

Functional Classification of the Existing Street System
}- -

t

-

• ,. ..

~-,

,-- ,.

ci~siification of street~ in an urban· area is intended to identify·· each
~;. -ii street; accbrciin'g ''t:o its serv':l.ce function. Such classification es-i:·a bJ'.iJh~i( th'e;.'. r el~l:ionship ;i,f each str~et to the entire system . s-er/icing
~: the•; ~t-b.a n ' atea·: _::
'
,_,.
.
"&lt;

.

..

:.i&gt;rr)~- cJ- r1~·

:: :c

... :1··· :;,,.

:..: ~-; ~

• .i

J

Y

-F utiH:'1.bh:s ir'e identified·- with respect to the types of land use served
tfie' magtiitudi of their traffic 'generation, and also according t'O
. ,;. '_ the mix of "through" and ' 1 '.Loc al" traffic on the various segments of the
network. Through traffic ref'ers to~ trips which begin and end outs·ia·e

:,anif

·::.:

·1

.•SJ.- .." ~-

:,: r: . '

J .,..'

·· -

66

�i

.. C

U&gt;·

' '

of the immediate study area. Mos~ of--t:~ tri~
n-S r ~ /-f&amp;f-":;e ; ani{;:i t
.: ~r; ,l~kel~ to h~~e t~eir. p~ t nt of __orig t ~ and -- ~~stin1ation .-~£ p.1.a ~~\fhr.:
~- r~-~&lt;Jte _· frb~ ~e~~~t 1ownship. Tht\ int 7rs,fate h ~gh11ax .. netwo~~ ?r-0,d -:rN~~? r
;:_:·Hrs_:-~ a ~ ;~t~
mak~ ~p the _P~;-nc 3pal ar ~~~i1-t. net'gn:1.s .1q f _J'.OA1s.

~~y~e~,,.

:;_k~·

! ::.'iar ge ''port:iort' ' c:sf ·'t i.-ip's "on a · re~iderltia.i streef1 "are like+X

·to.\~:~~m-

,;- ') ~~is~d' of ttaff i c ' with'"bdth o r igitf or deii'tinad.0 n in ·fJ;t,e i.mmedi &lt;;l ~i : f i"1

~,: ;. ~~,:I~fty~'. .These ''s~reet,~

~~ € :: therefore desJ &amp;~ated

-~s·_,l~ca~ l

ti:~--~ ~f, ½1b

·-:•~ Bit~ _f dfictiori:al syst;erli. ~·Local streets provide th~ .,~9 f or;st
__ wit,fi .3;cc~.s s
1
¾?;\: to ~a~tirtirig ·la'nd, ' \vherea~ i _arte r ial h_igfiwaxs
f~.i
iii
t'~t;,¢'·
mov{
mJ11sf ~:,1
i"

f\

€nr~ttgt\ ;1n1 ara'a ;1'· '• Figflre t~r present's° , a "ci".:rss:i,,ficat ion .q~ Qel l a°~T~~:- S '~f reets, ind _ro~ds
-~tr1:J t:fi:chi~;.; n,,_pepart1Aent. 0~
, ; (:MD~T~ in"_ 1979. A dessript.i 'on of -~he! varr o.~s cia5i~ihca~i_~I!,s 'ltqJlo',s
in ~able T--1.
·
·
·---~
. ..

'. hr

.. J~tP

·-r'~:'F~~~{~\~J~p

0

The following list illustrates th,e. ,ba,sic criteria which are generally
considered when classifying urban s 'treets.
The origin and'~de~1tin:adbri ' of trips served
(intra-urban, inter-urban and rural-urban).
~~_Gi--,_'l. :2:-.; '" The volume of trips served.
3. Th,e type of land uses served.
rl,1.,,
._,r,
4. Spacing between travel corridors.
~~'&amp;, '. :5 . .'. Rout 7 continuity. . .
.
:/,_I' _\ .· Physical
characteristics such as parking,
~:~ · _· , : the number of access points, etc.
1.

:«,.

X

• q~ i
l ~' J
· BE i
•°j.

1

\l_,

~. I

The i,,'C'fi'S.S'i:hcation of streets and highways in an area such' ~'.s! Delta
ToWI'\~~ipJwhich is rapidly urbanizing is often complicated be,s:r use
land·'_us-e· pat'terns are not yet established, travel volumes ar.e light
and the' ·e xis.ting physical condition of a roadway may discou~:~ge its
use as classified. It should be noted that road classifications
_-~. ?~~J,..e~-f~~~~~ .,i1: ju\is.dic~ions w_h~:~h are experien 7ing signifi~_fnf ;. ,·
:,-s--g;t~\\;J~ t9 in'7c~ea.:'es. l.Il traffic volumes, physi~~l roadway ~•~f bl~':i!.1,,
·-nP~ ~~~-gt_~- and cnanges . irt land uses.
·
. ... _,
,., '.· ,_.
~· ..\·~.:

~ - · ,-~;-l,._

--

-

1

~,,

,

~

.,-h,1 t~.(l

· ...

'~~;~ ~~ ~~~~~ PP,roximat1a}.y_ 160. tota~ ~11es of ro~~ways in D~1t 'r t'b~~-~ r,;
· ·,r · 1m d.1tlding' e'k()resswa-0;, sec_tion l ~ne roads and_ local subdivi~i9p_,.g1rj~ts
and roads. Road rights-of-way, including the interchange dghts-ofway, occupy over 2,000 acres or approximately nine percent of the
•
f
_,.,
~ '··.'\flttn·
,!:, °;; l 1
Township s total land area. Table T-2 depicts the total mileage of .the
various roadway classificat:f.ons in '' hel ta Township.
r:;,.
' ! J· "~
.Lt

~.ti\,,:

i .·:;

.{!'";!!':

,,,..,,

,,

·1 ·,

,., ,!:,

.J

'

.

i :•

-~ ,.

-,

,.

•.

l

- r! ..

n.-·n:1.

t'

;:.:' •'1.-

,0

, ... J

67

:.~

T :i' ,.:.. 3'"1!.~~

,"r

·::-.

., •• ,

.L '-\.\,.

iil; . .

TJ ::, ",:1 't .': b:-,,

!C •

:..

1

1:-r:

1

:,

~,- .

f

�This page was revised April of 1983

XI

Mass Transit Service i~ _Delt 9 .. Township

... ,:_,I .: ._ ... ._ ....

~-~

j )

7,

j

•

• ·•

•

-..

. ..

j ~' •

•

.~

' 1:i

..

U'

•. .._

I : ·

l.

,i._

.J

- •

f

'

.

. ":'" i__., i

(' .

\/

.-1

••

••.

t.

:-i :(

t

Ti;-a:nsit · service ln the Lansing _ai:;~a evolved _in a . ma11nei , s~ilaJ.; .. to., .t hat of
_; ?ffi.~r ~~:ts~:§s at?,"_~5.tJfi~ c~untry ~-:-. ¾&gt;. elec~f1.c'·~5 ~f:uE~fl~&gt;~~i~o':tL and
!~cal streetcar system served Lansmg and surround~g areas until 1932
, ,--r~ ~el! r they were rep}a~e~ . by a _mo~e- ~f_e~i~ln a~.9 : ~~e~!=&gt;-~';~, ~ot9r i ~u~ sys-V.ll- t~- ~9,94 fri~~it se~ice in the a 71~a _w?:~ J ?..r?,V.:!ded by Pli~yate comI964
y~ty -~~ , Lan~ing :i.1:1c,~e~~~d ,,i,~~-~V?lvem~t i~ S~?e
. ,&lt;?~~r_a~3:o~ o; th1;~e1;:,r,qpolit,~ bus system ~f.t h ~lw :; ~:j,ty _dSSlfin~~ ;C~~plete
0 · / ~ ~;

·t~z

,

p~!:~;:. -?~

- :;i~~l!~¼e::t~i!~;~~~;;1~!~i!:~~:i;~ (~rlFS;rt~:~:~~~;ltt:~j
~:e
cc£t:t ::~,f
t _~ ~ ,I:u½5;_fc A'.c,ts of Mic,lj.igan, .1.965, .thro~gh a .pet_1 t:j.op by, .,tllt;
~~o~eJer '"· p'ki :a: T°.~:~htp n·e vei; o;~ iG_i'i~.+Y Joined - C4,5A. / :;_t~'.fh e
'f-'5 iTlustrates CATA ridership figures for the past sever a,.;!, "'ft~,:~ ·\J!

}~~tt1~~¾.:,

,· _. .:.,

.

. • :; ' , 1

' tAB:t:E'::T-5 . "· .,

"::"·.

,:,. .' ·- .

.

=.:. .: '

::.~ ;, t" .

• ;: :. ,.

i '

1

I'.

::1: ·e

Year

£ ~ l .SU

. . - -'.) r .: :

,.\ tf . .

' r,

I

'

... ~ 4; .ioo,001
: -~: ~ 4,4,B l,184
·. -·'
4,4.68,828
_. -'- · • ~"' · 3 ;'a·20, 042
3,647,424
7

'~ - ,

1976'

- ~~}f+.P.~ ct~·.g

l ·

,.

B,- ·

t _;_ :':

~-~~3o'"fP,~~;.,
+,JP 5:7,~,4 8c.:i, _

s a.1.1!{975
• -..
. l.,,, • r9(4

9

~,~_c..;·,:_tl Jfi,•.~,--

.:1!:t ("I

., i·Q 1.' 1

c. 'J J

-~ ;•

Ridership

1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
.., 19]7 ,

,~

~ ,.,..

•

_j,"l • ',/JI

t .• ._

.

L·

.,. L

1,2~]
,,5)8 ',-i6
,-· - ,'f•~-- ;_~' ..

[.Cf

..i'. ~

~I~

-:q·

!:

1

In th?}afe 1970' s ~~lta T~wns.h tp . ai}nw.illy p:royt~~d _CATi\-~-~ ti[ t¢.~ri~j.al
su~sid'ies · for tran·s ~t servic~ prov~1~f "."7ithip th:~ T_Rwnship ~ ) ~ ~, .~-~t
this method of fundmg transit service was altered when a seR1 te ~onfi;~eE-.-,g~t;ff~ CATA , ~nd. _De,lta Townrhi_!' was coopert~ively d~~~~~ c,?,µtr exe- : t!:1~~~- nri ~~ contra~;, }rafted for a _1 p~e-yea~_}'er?,-od, specif~e.~ g ._h .- ~ount
· · 6~.J~D')·f~-: to be ~~ovided and the c~rresp9~~mgJ pa~ents. · · _, · . -:i ·
c,, f -

-:. ...

·

d

:_, ')

lf:

i

:::..• '~ -

.

;

Route" Nuriloer
Six of the CATA system~.• presently
traverses the Township
along
$.
J r:.
• '
.. '
"' •waverly Road and West Saginaw Highway. :rbis route has one hour, int_~ rvals
between buses (headways). A total of fifteen bus trips a day are made
into the Township beginning at 6:40 a.m. and ending at 9:15 p.m. Transit
service is not provided to the Township on Saturdays or Sundays.
..., 4

-, •

C.

~

In 1981 voters residing within governmental units which are members of
CATA, being the cities of Lansing and East Lansing and Meridian, Delhi
and Lansing Townships, approved a millage issue which provided operating
funds for CATA for a two-year period. Since Delta Township is not a
member of CATA, its residents are not affected by the transit millage.

84

-

�I

This page was revised April of 1983

.. , .- lhe _Eat;qn _CoJ.n ty \ran~pp.rtat~o!1 ~~u:h&lt;::t;.\;Y (~T~{ bega~ 1&lt;;Pei;_a\=i;&lt;?.:n on
· October 1, 1980 under a contract with tbe Michigan
Department o.f' 'l'ranspor1
; ,·:;: c.it'iori~ *• unci'er th-~ ·c ontract, th.i{ ,sysf~ was)OOf.' fti1{d~d 'bf,' t'~-~ ."# ~~ e
through Septembe~ '30, 1982 at whi~h t'inie tn'e residents of Mto1r"C'o'unty
began making a local contribution in the amount of 25% from October 1,
1982 to September 30, 1983 after which time the contribution would be
50% of the operational budget. In August of 1982 Eaton County voters
approved a 2/lOths of a mill proposal for supplemental funding for
EA.TRAN.
In 1981 Delta Township joined EA.TRAN which is a demand response bus system
which constantly changes the way the buses are dispatched as customer demand changes. EA.TRAN services the entire Eaton County area while specializing in commuter express trips, and medical trips for senior citizens and
handicappers into the Lansing Area. Appro~imately 70% of EATRAN's riders
are on a permanent reservation, that is they utilize the system at the
same time on a regular basis.
The following factors could provide a major stimulus to increasing mass
transit ridership in the Township:
1.
2.
3.
4.
XII

Expansion of mass transit service.
Continued increases in the number of multiple-family
households.
Increased motor vehicle parking costs at Lansing
Metropolitan locations, particularly the central
business district.
Increased costs of motor vehicle ownership and
operation.

Railroad Facilities Serving Delta Township
The Chesapeake and Ohio and the Grand Trunk Western are the two railroad
lines with tracks running through Delta Township. The Chesapeake and
Ohio track cuts across the extreme northw~st corner of the Township, but
does not provide direct service to the Township. Two Grand Trunk Western
tracks cut across the southeast corner of the Township parallel to U.S.
27. The tracks are part of a main line route serving Chicago, Port
Huron, Toronto and intermediate cities. The Lansing yard located at
Snow Road and Pierson Highway is Grand Trunk Western's headquarters and
main marshalling yard in the Lansing Metropolitan Area.
Grand Trunk Western facilities and services in Delta Township represent
one of the most important transportation assets in the Lansing Metropolitan Area. The Lansing yard consists of 13 switching tracks with automated controls and is a central assembly and dispatch point for railroad cars destined for all parts of the country. Grand Trunk Western
serves the following Delta Township industrial type facilities.
Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant
Lansing Board of Water &amp; Light's Erickson Station
Meijers Distribution Center
Millett Elevator Company
Ralston Purina Company
Grand Trunk Western has indicated a willingness to provide additional s.pur
service to new industries desiring to locate in the Township's industrial
tract. The Grand Trunk Western Railroad tracks carry approximately 15
85

�I

This page was added April of 1983
.,r=J-

:-rr.:

_

r:-... ·

'"'.::..•r-""

· i. ..,..,,......

-,· ... -

.·

-

-

-r•;

-. . .~.- ....... .,

\.ii

1.••

..,

~.,,~ r-'a ~n~ ) &gt;e1;:_ _:q.c!Y. , it\ ,_ea_clf d,,ir_e~cion, nJ.4~'fng Gr·a nd ·:_rrunR ~esterrt tnt?; ~jor
'IOJ,. ··: .r~:i;l ' J~i:itf~
itf ~he ·.1~nJ'm g· ar~~-'- Grcfrik 'Trunk Weste~~ has" eliminc!·teq the
. : ·tas"sl[nger ; servfce it onc;e I?fq~ ided to the Township.
'
' ,
r ,_.

'(.,_.Ja~•uv

nuJ,:,. .

, 'l

~&lt;)(

:r~ci'.

::.

::; ,

~

J
c; "'?!;.

'"! • : ~ .

\

' ) ;:· ~;&gt;..

..,m., ..;

ic:-·

-,..

,..,t:. :r. :-- ·,j:
1

.A:

'
('

..,.,

~cr- i n.c;

.: ;~~ ...

·,1:·

':'. ;c.

r·

.,

·•.-· ... ,:t,

,::

r ..

··1

rJ..: -'·

,,.

i. ......

·,

~

·.J

......
&gt; ;_
j.l.

( · -~

·'_-:5'.

1
,j

t· .....--~f..:,.l.:

-

·•;

i::,·

,_

..r: :::• -.,
•

U°f'"

·- -

~-

I..

. . ,._

:.. •.·!_··

,; F,

~ I ._ : ... ...

• • J ';.,

pr'

-. t'• -

jC

J

a

,,·f''

,. ~T -~-•n:
f1

:1.l of
1 un-

,.,

-s .:.···
;;: r.J.8:a

,.. d:i....

:1:

_;_ ,:· ·.. !(.,;

,...... -~.

- - : l_!· __ ..•

2 .)

-

:i lJ ~::

:.-:c,,,.~ '.:-:'. '·,. . .BS-{f.E. r-:..31
~ r .l ri-c :rr,.WQ.'T ~- •·· · :-:·

.C"'1~~;~:;1 v.·

!'

t,~--- ..:1

--·

l'

.-

.)J:CtJ".t'l ~f!_;_:·

; c~·· u.. s..E .....s·.:.. :
:I':' c"'....
?_;,., _.

'·• ••'

'3' "-....

,-: " b:':I ~,:)ru

': ·.,

.. ..,

,r.:

,·O

~

~

.:

··•t',

~.rl-e:..

.cw ;.;

.;_::J_."

,(J · ..

\'

,.,.

;~.

-,

?!_

- ..

,)

SSA

;~;..,

�~I f
This page was revised April of 1983
requirements per gallon of storage, the provisions of easy access for repair, and the fact that ground ~torage facilities have more aesthetic
appeal than elevated storage tanks.
The Delta Township system has a 500,000 gallon elevated tank on the east
side of Snow Road just north of St. Joe Highway. This tank has a static
water pressure at its base of 59 pounds per square inch (PSI). A ground
storage tank, equipped with variable speed pumps, is located on the west
side of Creyts Road some 600 feet north of Millett Highway. The tank contains 1.25 million gallons of storage capacity and delivers water into
the 16 inch South Creyts transmission main. The ground storage facility
helps maintain 50-55 PSI in the south end of the water system _s erving
lands south of I-496.
Water Consumption
Table W-2 illustrates that water consumption in Delta Township has steadily
increased during the past s:ix years . A consistent pattern has emerged,
that being that approximately 50 percent of the total water consumed is
attributed to single family residences, 25 percent is consumed by commercial/office establishments, 20 percent is consumed by multi-family residential developments and five percent is consumed by industry. It is
expected that the amount of water consumed by industrial establishments
will significantly increase as additional manufacturing operations locate ·
in the Township industrial tract.
TABLE W-2
DELTA TOWNSHIP WATER CONSUMPTION
1977-1982
Year

Annual Water Consumption

1977

589,543,~80 _gallons

1978

638,522,720 gallons

1979

652,824,480 gallons

1980

647,782,960 gallons

1981
1982
Fire Flows
As suggested previously, one major problem with the water distribution
system is the undersized water transmission mains spaced on one-mile
intervals. Historically, fire underwriters have identified municipal
fire flow requirements using empirical formulas based upon resident
population in the service area. With increasing sophistication of water
supply systems and fire fighting apparatus, new criteria have been
adopted which recognize the types of structure and density of development. In 1977, the Township Engineering Department calculated fire flows
for existing major buildings, a partial listing of which is included in
Table W-3.

94

-

�This page was revised April of 1983
r··

1.,c

t

1 : • ..
,f,·

I

1J

:j
;-•:

:.;_

_.,

~r

J

}

_Y

: (,. •· • •

t•

,"

';L

I

! ,. • ,

) ~ t '"':

lr.

(

:, -=-.~. .) ~ .: .

TABLE W-3

..

,, '~

!

!

I

·•

~

•

I

! '~-.;

..:

, l,.'

1'

~'I

t fil.·

:

'

:.

. Recommended °J
· .t Fire Flow

i

Es tabliJ;lhment ,
,

..... 3 :.!3.1

RECQMMENDEll FIRE FLOWS

·....

·1.

(Duration= --of· ··'
Fire",- Fldw !:&gt;,..

L ~ .. ,

l

6 hou'rs· '

_ ._Vill~ge .Green Apartments · -· 6,000 GPM
~-.;f ,t

9'-.r·'."

Jo.~

t-•

~

~

·-r

I

4 hours'

4-:,1500 .GPM

~ansing Mall.

1,,

, ,· W~~ t

12

~-~1~. . 1-,:
·H:e _,,,
2.n&lt;.

-~-!

:;4";_

.!).

''L

0

1''lJC

Michigan, Nat_j.ona¼, _ ,.__ ·::
;Bank Center
. ..,
. '1

,,.

Sea Hawk Restaurant
.

c J r...

~

"")

$,a gin a~ Plaza, ,

':....

;.. J ~-

.

-~

()" ' ~.1.

,_. ~ijer . (re~ail store)
-Hilton Ii,m .

Ct, •-- ~

4 '1&gt;l:aurs:l -· ~ ...:., .,

0

- -::

..,.~ ....-._"1-~rl'I

:31 .. :

.,,-1,:;-

,

, J.:50 -GPM ".l: ·: ; ·, ·, ,,
,,

~1

r..

, -~

.. --~

~; n· _J :.:-. ,, rr,.._, _; . .... ___ ,. ._

, :-

··~ -:Fbours 1 .,,, •
-:: f

:·~. ·-.

:

2 hours
VDlf ... 2

,;: 4,500 GPM

'

,· . ..i'...b ~
&gt;-rj

'I

3,000 GPM
4,500 GPM

~

·:- '·

-.J

1,500 GPM

r-

W~verly High School
_.,.

"' J

. J :- :2

t.,,,.,,

-J :",

·;,. )2,

._,.,..

_. I,

-'o

t

~-_Plum Tre~ Ap~:r;:tme.nt,s. ·,,,,: ·. 4,000. GPM:';,_.' ·

·-'&gt;.-.. &gt;6':'.:

J.o~ '" -

'·

,.

he.: .:.r~~

'-' ") . 4 h.Gfirs
-·w -m,- J : :
r

~

•

I

,_. Bl hours abL11 -• 1 ::w:
,·•-, JS.rt

,,.,.,

·

14 °bout§'::11!'."

- ...
.,''O

The addition of the 1.25 million gallon ground storage facility and the in.., , sta:1,lation qf 12 and 16 inch transmission mains along cr-eyts Koad imp.r oved
: , ,_ the water syst~m' s fire flow capability and duration of .:l!:low:n°:tt -s~ould be
ri~~ed that having fire flow capability in well production and~to·r-age !-:d oes
._,~ ~••,:. no~ . r_nean ~48:t recommended fire flow can be delivered to the s'ite '61-f •a ''-fire.
~e , dis tr !bu tion mains must be properly sized, spaced 1 . ,·artdHllooped-- to J.p rovide , ~mch fire flows at all locations in the water servidi ar-ea', i · u ··r!

t;-: _.

r,·."

For purposes of providing adequate fire protection, close monitoring of daily
water consumption demand versus supply capacity is needed. The ',exjjsting wate:
system is capable of providing adequate fire flow to all but' 'a fl~w :.customers.
Furthermore, as service is extended to new areas, need for transmission mains
·,~and added storage must be continuously reviewed.
, 1.;1: 1 " ;_;·..

+.,~;r:. ,,

.:

Fut~r,e .S .ervice Area
. r:,. fJ

~·\;.

.t.l,_:. ;;:·

Figure W-11 provides an indication of the future water system service ,area
_in increments of five years. This figure should not be cons·11ru~&lt;l 'as · '- iden tifying precise lands to be served during each ti~e perio&amp;.'·· ·rt· 'fs int'.'ericled to
convey the general extent and location of service area extensions based upon
projected service demands. Figure W-II should be viewed in conjuncti9n wi th
.Fi~ure SS-II presented in the Sanitary Sewer Service chapter asj to ;$he provision of both public water and public sanitary sewer servicess -:t.e crgd.ven

95

�·promptly toward rehabilitating and improving these collection and treatment facilities.
The following narrative puts issues in perspective and
suggests an approach to resolution of each issue. The following is intended to provide a basis and framework for the proposed extensions to
the sanitary sewer system which are discussed at the conclusion of this
chapter.

fr

Infiltration

,C

The collection sewers in the Jrelta' 3roiiiitsh1ip sewer system are relatively new,
the oldest lines were constructed in 1965. There are, however, significant
quanti1~ies :-0f groundwater infilt:.r ation snd inflow to sanitary sewer iines
in the .Rresent system.
It is estimated: that apflq~iw-_g_t.?lY 40 percent of the
wastewater - received at the treatme~t plant is groundwater and/or stormwater .
There are , locations in the collection .sewer:,, :sys·1:em where sewer pipe is situated within the high ground water table.
Also, a large number of dwellings
and busJ.~SrSes have roof and footing ,:drains connected t.o sanitary sewer
lines.
Some situations exist where sanitary sewer service leads have been
built t!,1,:-o.u,gh an existing storm . sew.er. - These ~:a'ds -may:.,be- broken or cracked causing a direct flow of storm water into the collection sewer system.
This exc~ss, flow of water into the collection syS'teni tnrer1oaus t-he wastewater -treatment plant. Flow meters at the plant have recorded up to nine
million gallons per day of influent to the treatment plani:, far :·in excess
of plant :. i::.apa~i ty. The excess of. fG.-ow occurs primarily during periods of
heavy rainfall, usually in the months of March and April.
2 :.:,-( ,•

-.

:.

~'

l:

•

.:

A detailed study of the present infiltration was conducted during 197519 77. 2 a1'ha..s study used daily flow records from the WWTP.i_: Mlich· we-r e analyzed. The amount of infiltration and inflow was estimated based on
methods 8 9eveloped by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency t ' -rt ' was
estimated that annually 300 million gallons of excess flow enters the
treatme~t; pJ:an t . An economic study was conducted to determine aeosteffective approach to dealing with the excess flow.
• J •
- ·:"'J:_

·.;)--:t::

L-•,.,._=-

~·

v:. ..t.., .·.:~ ~·.

~, .'._)Tih~ ! s1™,,4y rev~aled that it would.not ·'ibe cost-effective to initiate a · program
,;; , .!:.:!?.f,r-4is.c;onnect:fing footing drains, but it did indicate that :' it would be cost-:- -u~e~~t;,:f;;v.e , to ~,emove excess was,tewater . flows by rehabilitating existing
, .s•'l 1 ·-s~we.~s t: :;A d~ision to proceed with rehabilitation on a limited basis· would
~-~ .a1llJ!inJ!t1:t ·ap{tr())Cimately 15 percent of· the excess flow (•45 3 mi-ilion gallons
annualJ,y);..-: T.he remaining 258 millfu'n gallons of excess flow would ' continue
to be treated at the wastewater treatment plant.
Ue&gt;t
1 n ·so..;
,, • .b ,: "',Qual;;i;..t y ~
of
, 8 -_r.,,ffi;-'I:+.~ ated; EfUuent
0

)

Water quality standards promulgated as a result of Public Law 92!..500 impose
stringent quality requirements as to discharged effluent from the Delta Township WWTP. All present and future discharges from the WWTP nius.t: ·mee:t these
standards.

!,_

f ,·:·.r,

·: $ ;'

--,,

_c-:;-r2··-· ,

....... , ·.

::.., r!'• ;p.e1,ta ·¾Jom:stlip is operating its treatment plant under final ef·fl1:1ent stand;,,: ~rd:s. .4 11. mun.icipal t:~ eatment plants throughout the nation operate as pro81 :Ci:.::'.,::.
n .. ;

-v,,

:t "J r·u t rrc· .; ·

. -;,; i Reported i.n the Facilities Plan, conducted by Delta Township personnel in
· n;=, cboperaition- with Fishbeck, .Thompson, Carr and Huber, Consul ting Engineers.

102

�This page was revised April of 1983
}

-,f'lJ

;.f

... ~

"\

::: ·

.,

......

-

~•'"'l"'rr

t..; rJ-

,---if

vided in the National Pollution Discharge· El~inatibn System ' '(NPDES). The
1
U.S. _;Envi~o~e~tal p~,;tecti~il. Agen~y- issu-~s-' NPDES permi,t:s'
ei di "6perat1
ing t'r'eatment. pla~t iuid . estael_ishe§ . specifi~ watJ:r q\iA}_~·t r i~tt(~~ias as
to effluent discharges.
·

e~r

Table SS-1 presents sewage effluent standards established for the Delta
Township WWTP by the Michigan Water Resources Commission, acting agent for
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The WWTP is presently in need
of improvements in order to address the following items:
- Proposed EPA sewage effluent standards require that ammonia
nitrogen be removed.
- The flows of wastewater to the WWTP vary significantly during
a typical day which hinders the plant from operating as efficiently as possible.
- During hot, humid, windless, days the open treatment facilities
at the plant presently emit a significant odor .
- Excess seasonal flows of influent, attributable to infiltration, cannot be properly treated due to the limited capacity
of the WWTP.
The following improvements are needed at the wastewater treatment plant:
1) ammonia nitrogen removal, 2) equalization of wastewater influent, 3)
odor control, 4) increased capacity, 5) auxillary power, and 6) backup
sludge disposal. Delta Township is presently securing the necessary
grants which, if obtained, will assist in financing a significant portion
of the proposed improvements will result in the WWTP being in full compliance with future sewage effluent standards.
In August of 1982 the voters of Delta Township authorized the issuance of
four million dollars in general obligation bonds. This authorization provided Township officials flexibility in borrowing money at more favorable
financing terms in order to pay for improvements to the wastewater treatment plant and extensions to collector sewers which will be partially
financed through the sale of bonds.
III

Future Service Areas for the
Wastewater Collection and Treatment System
Projected Growth of Service
The increase in demand for sanitary sewer service is directly linked with
the increase in resident population. However, the extension of sanitary
sewers is dependent on physical and financial constraints.
This section provides projections of sanitary sewer service demand, proposed sewer service areas, and the periods of time in which the service is
likely to be provided. Integration with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan is provided by utilizing population projections, land consumption rates and land use as set forth in chapters one and two. Table SS- 2
presents actual rates of new customer connections for the past seven years.
These rates, together with anticipated expansion of service described in a
later section, form the basis for projecting sanitary sewer customers,,,as
illustrated in Table SS-3.

103

I

�This page was added Apr il of 1983

..,

"'· .. ~- :t
(·

c. '

~~~ - t h~!',; ?:F.P3ec,~j on; ~f- f u,turf.-, ga;iitary sewer c~~)=o~~rs , was co~p} eted, it
was
nece~sary
to further refin·e the
projections.
inc t -erms
of cu·s·tomer
·t · :;c-.·
' ..
i.l ,-:,.
"'!
·1 · ;
;-••; i,t( , · · · ,
~qu1.rf+~n :t;~, a{l,d expected wastewa1= er f19w at t~e t;-eatfue~,t · p~ant. Table
ss:.4 -pr ovia es· the· results of this evaluation. i" "--· ..., " · ,,,_. . ·:.
1

-:·.

.

,:;,J

•"J

~.::.

~-

'"·

•

...,

..

- ~

- :.,,:

··q: .

:J .)·

&gt;;
''..!·-

r : :..

_.t '~ ~

•' ·'
t_,..,

.

,.

G'

_I·

')C• l

,c. - :. :_ i./

'f:.

;_:•

.. · ,1

' :; : .! 1P..l \, J

:: ..

. 1,1:, ...;· .
!=•Lt"

lal
\ l:'Y:
'"'.:F

(c

1=- --~;~T~,

b_r:,:, , 1~WC

c:.s :)S.O

s.r::

!.

J'

b f .-

11'. ,.J." j f · . .... B:.•
~

':x.:i:.:

I

..,

~

.:.,

&lt;r -

T,,;: ~ ·;. ~ - .. .r1£!.i.!. i~ r ··-J: ·
.. ~qm-o:.i l .1.u:1 u.:

:.J.

L

t

.1: .,.• .! ::. .~.

.i r

r..

• __,._J

::;;rl-.:'.'
.J~b~~

1-.:.,_

11\,.,!

... ,

i~ ·

10 :::::,n .
• -~!' .; ~ :.,•!J.

103A

•.1-:.·,·

�ents and expected wastewater flow at the treatment plant.
provides the results of this evaluation.

Table SS-4

TABLE SS-1
WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION'S EFFLUENT QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR THE DELTA TOWNSHIP WWTP
Effluent
Parameters
Biochemical
Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 )(2)
Suspended Solids
Ammonia Nitrogen
Phosphorus

Dissolved Oxygen
Fecal Coliform Bacteria

Proposed Final
Standards

Existing
Treatment

Current
Standards ( l)

12 mg/L

16.5 mg/L

10 mg/10)

8 mg/L

15.0 mg/L

10 mg/L

Me.8 :surement not Required

2 mg/L

Provide 80% or greater removal of
total phosphorus contained in untreated wastewater

92%

5 mg/1(3)

5 mg/L
200/100 ml

200/ 100 ml

200/ 100 ml

PH

6. 5-9.0

6.5-9.0

6.5-9.0

Flow Measurement

Daily

Daily

Daily

(1) Current standards will remain in effect at the WWTP until

the proposed improvements are completed at which time the
proposed final standards will take effect.
(2) Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) means BOD measurement average
for five days.
(3) Daily discharge limitations, all other values are thirty-day

average discharge limitations.

\.

104

�This page was revised April of 1983

.'

· TABLE SS-2
I

;
I

".

I

I

SANITARY SEWER CUSTOMERS*
1975-1982

'

,, : u

'•

~

l

I

I

Custome-r-.-!U-ass ',~ - , l:-97- 5 ·· 1976

1977

19 78

1979

1980

Single..:Fai;t-:Hy · ,&gt;::-" r
Residenti~l ' -1 1,1:;m, 3220 .

3500

3530

3860

3950

130

140

190

210

MultipleFamily
Residential

100

3260

120 ·

1981

1982

•

~

OfficeCommercial

230

270

300

330

360

430

Industrial

1

6

5

5

5

11

*l'he number of customers may actually decrease from year to year due to
bu i lding vacancies.
TABLE SS-3
PROJECTED SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS
AND LAND ACREAGE CONSUMPTION 1985-2000
1985

1990

6000
464 Ac.

6830
464 Ac.

7650
8480
464 Ac. 464 A,c.

170
80 Ac.

190
101 Ac.

220
240
101 Ac. 101 Ac.

Office/Commerc i a1Cl)
Land~ Consumption

370
37 Ac.

410
38 Ac.

Industrial (1)
Land Consumption

13
139 Ac.

18
139 Ac.

Single-family Residential
Land Consumption
Mµ ltj,p1,e~family Residentia1Cl)
Land Consumption

1995

2000

•

, ... ;

450
38 Ac.

500
38 Ac.

28
23
139 Ac. 139 Ac.

(1) For purpose of computation of future wastewater influent at the
1 WWTP ;-' al1 .,. classes of customers are converted to customer equivalents, as set forth in Table SS-4 . An equivalent customer (a
hypothetical term) means the wastewater from a typical household
in the year 1977. Based upon actual water consumption statistics,
this translates to 225 gallons/day/household or 6805 gallons/
household/month.
0

·105

�L,

I

1. t} ,:.

. • ~.:,

SOLID WASTE
,.':,..

-·

.·r

Solid waste is generally referred to as materials which you usually have
to pay someone to t.a-ke off-s~t;e ::-and _d,ispose of. Table SW-1 illustrates
annual solid waste generation .in Eaton County for the year 1980. Of
the estimated 54,493 tons of solid waste generated in Eaton County in
1980, tapproximately 79 perce~~ •. or 43; 1:68 tons t were di:sposed : : Qf ~in , ·· : _.
landfills. It has been estiinal:ed tha£· approxiinately 7·5 -percenfC::O.r.::.-t:HEr..s-., !S::.'.·
solid waste in Eaton County is generated by residential househol.c;i$:; ·.......;.
Table SW-2 ill4strates :$Olid c~raste estimates for Delta . Township :f~i:,}:::.:5':,;j.t.
the 1980-year 2000 period.
&gt;~£:.~'i.i~,,s:•
. , ...

I

I

..:..:..:£q; ..I .•

TABLE SW-1

I

'.r•~ ,

J

L

;i

;..,

ESTIMATED SOLID WASTE GENERATION

I

EATON COUNTY
: ;-_.

1980
•~ f

I

-,

• r ;..'-

Coefficient*
(lbs/day)
2.9

Number .Peqpl~
(Residents/
Employees)

/tons of.
Waste,/'
Year

77,402

40,965

10. 6**

4,248

5,223

Retail

5 . 75

5,238

3,494

Government

1.5

2,489

Residential

((

j

•.._

'~

Manufacturing

433
,_ ft. ...

Communications/Utilities
Significant Other

10. 6

31..

5. 75

~J,.L• t!,

6, 506~. 1

.[

'o'.

38

L l

IT" '"- .. - •

TOTAL

.4., 3.40

54,493
.Ii"

j ....... ?1•1',...

_r-1

' ,';.

*State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, _ Reseurce._:·
Recovery Division, Guidebook of Solid Waste Management, Table
4-1 , pg . 4-4 •
**Coefficient was derived from actual waste generation figures
from Oldsmobile and Fisher Body, Lansing, Michigan.
.\. . ~(1

Source:

1 ,-

Proposed Eaton County 641 Plan, Tri-Cotmty Regipnp1.: :PJ.aning Commission, 1982.
'J • 9,.,,

\

114

- '··

,

�This page was revised April of 1983
TABLE SWr 2
ESTIMATED SOLID WASTE GENERATION
DELTA TOWNSHIP
1980-2000

..

:,·

'

--,· 198'0

1•-

,

r...;.7 I.. l •J'

qn

~" .l ,

1985

..

'16·,215 Tons

18,772 Tons

2000

•

26,005 Tons

rr .:

Source:

Proposed Eaton County 641 PLan, Tri-County Regional Planning Commission, 1982.
"

Solid waste collection is presently provided by private haulers within
1:ie'lt'a Township. Most of the solid waste generated in tpe Township is
&lt;:.. pr i s 't?n't::ly deposited at the Granger Land Development Sanitary Landfill
~1:oc~f ed in Watertown Township in Clinton County. This privately owned
· · ~ iciiity presently accepts approx~ tely 800,000 cubic yards of solid
·•t.;ast 'e:' per year. It is estimatea t h:a,t 78 _pe;~ent of the waste deposited
' . 'at"" tthr;f Granger Landfill originates in fugham County, ~l, percent in r
Clinton County and 10 percent in Eaton County. If the operators of
the landfill are permitted to continue wit~ present exp~nsion plans
a nd 1f· the amount of solid waste does not ~increase appreciably in the
·t '
\ '·
future, it is estimated that the landfill will . have sufficient capacity
to operate until 1998.
C

, ..,1

D'...

,..

J

Solid was te· disposal is also provided by a landfill near Eaton Rapids.
This facili t y is limited in the amount of waste it can accept and is
expef ted to cease operation within several years.
Eaton County operated a landfill on Windsor Highway, northwest of Potterville, from 1971 to 1982. The Eaton County Board . of Commissioners closed
the landfill due to the increasing cost of keeping the operation in
"'c ompi i anc'e with licensing requirements of the Michigan Department of
Natur al Resources (DNR). The closure of the Eaton County landfill re: su ited in greater amounts of solid wastes being diverted to the Granger
' 1andfili in Clinton County, the C and C landfill in Calhoun County and
· the ' ~ ton "Rapids landfill.

-~

--

, r~rr- . . .: ... -,

The r~cycling of solid waste is an idea which is becoming increasingly
popular. In 1979 the DNR's Resource Recovery Division published a document entitled Resource Recovery in Michigan : Potential, Costs and Impact.
The following excerpt from this document defines the terms source separation and recycling and notes the benefits of these approaches.
Source Separation:

Recycling:

Separation and collection of individual
recyclable components at the point of
generation or discard.

When the materials collected are used to make a
product (collection by itself is not recycling.)

So"urce separation and recycling should not be viewed as a panacea for
solid waste management. Regardless of whether a recycling program is
successful or not, it will not take care of all solid wastes. However ,

115

.i

�·r

FUTURE LAND USE
I ,

The Future Land Use Component con_tains. the Future Land Use Plan and
analyses of its different land use elements. Six separate parts of
the component describe and analy~e residential development, commercial
development, office development, industrial development, open space and
recreation facilities and the thoroughfare network designed to serve
the proposed lartd use pattem. A·.brief discussion is·\riso provided regarding the relationship betwe~n lanp use planning 1and zqning. Figure
LU-I is 'the Generalized Future Lana Use Plan while Table LU-1 indicates
the areas allocated to differre n_~- la~~ uses.
, 0 ,.
,. .. ·;c,:·
I

The Relationship of Planning to Zoning
The relatioE-ship betwe~p_ lan~ u:~,e plfinning and zoning is ,m impp~~~~t one.
Planning is basically the act of planning the uses of land within the
Township for • 'the futurJ while ~6ni~g' is the act qf regulating_ ti\:~'.,.c ~se
of
. .•
these lands by ordinance. The laws 9f the State of Michigan require that
'' a co~unitf 'e ngage in land u~~ ~l'~ni?g'
activities, including t~_' p,repar1
ation of a " comprehensive plan,. pf"ior to the init;i.a.tion o.f a zoning ordin!'illce in ~- coininuni ty'.
·"' :.. ,.
Bi,
' ·"
:
"
~ ") ....

Dt•

....

~,

·~

-;

i. .

'

.

""

.1-

r .

,'::, . . . .·

,,,,

,,

."tr

In order to 'irovide . a b~tt~i-' unders tanµing of the terms _pl;:m~'i ~~ ~fl zons- ing, the :-• fol16wing ·definitions are offered:
.
. .,.
. , ..
·~ •. :Z::.'

·S

·r

Land Use Planning:

(·-(

. ~ . r.

Zoning:

i ,.;:

"' ·

_

....

,.

.J '•,

-

~

S ..... !~1J:.S

''1:;&gt;0

,: •

The process of guiding the future growth and development of a community. Generally•. ..a .docum~t
~s pre:;· - -:
-·
J..i.
pared known as the Comprehen~ive Plan wh~ch ~ddresses
the various facet~ relating fo thr . . grj:rw.th ot -a community. Through the process - of land use planning it is intended that a community can ,__ preserve,.~promote, protect
and improve the public health, safety 'Tand general welfare. Additional considerations include; comfort,
good order, appearance, convenie~ce, . iaw ~nfq~c:emen t
and fire prevention; prevent the overcrowdtng·· 9f land
and avoid undue concentration of p~pu~~tio~; ~iiilitate the adequate and efficient provision ,of , transportation, water, sewage services, scli 99 is, ~p~rk'.~.:-~ recreationa1 facilities, housing and other requireme~ts and
services; and conserve, develop, utilize and protect
natural resources within the community.
J •

The process of partitioning a community into districts
each of which permits certain uses of land for the
purpose of conserving and promoting the health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the people within
the community . A zoning ordinance is often adopted
which contains regulations controlling land uses, densities, building heights and bulk, lot sizes, yard and
open spaces, setbacks and accessory useq ,_... .A zoning
ordinance consists of two disti1Lct ·parts, ·being a
written text and a district map. The text sets forth
the purposes, uses and district regula,.9 ,on~ : fol?&gt; each

118

�~- t ..

•'- r 1 • •.:.

j

5

This page was revised April of 1983

·-•;

TABLE LU-1
; r ... ·:..-;

FUTURE LAND USE

LAND USE CLASSIFICA!ION

ACRES

PERCENT
OF TOTAL

Very: i9w Density Residential

2,366

10.3

8,786

38.4

739

3.3

,c:;

'~

'';:.I

Lp~ pen.sity _R~sidential

_MediUlll Density Residential

618

High - D~n~ity ~esidential
;

~

.....

( J

~

r

2.7

tf

425

1.9

645

2.8

Light Industr;r.

599

2.6

Heavy Industry

1,913

8.4

Community Facilities

534

2.3

Parks and Open Spaces

766

3.3

Agricultural and Non-Urban

2,451

10.7

Transportation

2,145

9.3

Grand River

352

1.5

City of Lansing

576

2.5

22,915

100. 0

_ Off~~~- p~v 719,pment
r ..

119

.-.

�Thie page was revised April of 1983

·,
district and the standards for special land uses and
admimistration of the ordinance. The map denotes
a specific zoning district for every parcel of land
within the community.

(

Zoning is one of the instruments, along with capital improvements programming and the administration of local subdivision regulations, which
implements the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. The enactment and administration of the zoning ordinance are legislative and
administrative processes conducted by local units of government relating
to the implementation of the goals and policies of the comprehensive
plan.
II

r.

(_

Residential Development

:

The predominant land use in the Future Land Use Plan is residefitial tlevelopment. A total of 12,509 acres or 54 percent of the Township is designated for residential use. Four general residential d€:Yelopnierit densities are recommended; very low density, low density, medium density and
high density. According to population projections prepared in development of the Comprehensive Plan, the year 2000 population of Delta Township wili be approximately 34,000 persons. The residential derisity•; pattern has been designed to protect the character of existing neighborhoods
and to provide attractive areas for the development oi i1ew ·hbtl~ing C The
majority of residential land has been planned for low density development
in accordance with the character of the existing residential d~velopiuent
pattern. Several areas have been designated for medium and high density
residential development in response to the growing demand fo r: ··mu1.tiple
family housing within the Township.
One of the land development concepts which is becoming increasingly popular is a technique known as planned unit development. Several planned
unit developments have been established· in Delta Township. A brief explanation of the concept of planned unit development follows the description of the various residential densities.
!.. ..

Very Low Density
Residential Development

'

:

·;

,_, ....

1

( ·-

The Future Land Use Plan indicates a total of 2,366 acres or lG p1dcent of
the Township is designated for very low density residential development.
Very low density residential areas are intended to be developed at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per acre. It is anticipated that very
low density areas will be developed with single-family detached residences
which utilize private wells and septic tanks. Very low density residential
areas are located in the southwestern portion of the Township and north of
the Grand River. It is intended that these very low density areas will remain essentially non-urban in character with large individual lots due to
the limited fire service which is available to these areas. Public utilities such as water and sanitary sewer service are not envisioned for these
areas in the near future . The very low density residential land use indicated north of the Grand River is intended to preserve the existing nonurban character of that area which contains agricultural parcels, woodlots,
flood plain areas, and a few very low density sin8le-family subdivisions.
The very low d_e nsity residential land use indicated for the southwestern

120

�. .,_.j.r

C

:,.,

This page was revised April of 1983
portion of the Township is intended to preserve the largely non-urban .
character of · this area which includes four sections of land designated
. for agricultural purposes. The very low density residential designation
aJ.sQ, respects the poor drainage capabilities of soils in this area.
Density
R,esident·ial Development

µOW ''

'.1 .

The Future Land Use Plan indicates a total of 8,786 acres or 38 percent of
tb._e. Township for low density residential development.
Low density resid~~t-ia1,; areas are intended to be developed at a maximum density of five
uni.tl's per acre. It is anticipated that low density residential areas
will be developed primarily with single-family detached residences
~l~hough planned unit developments or other development forms which do
IlQ!,e~ceed five dwelling units per acre could be utilized. It is intended
that low density residential areas will be served by public water and
sewer service and hard surfaced roadways. It is recommended that certain
limited institutional and non-residential uses, such as community shopping
fa-ci~ities, be permitted in order to provide convenient services to resi4entiial areas while at the same time preserving the overall residential
,&lt;iQ.h _~acter pf the area in which they are located. Low density residential
~~yelop~ent areas are concentrated in that portion of the eastern half of
the Township lying between the Grand River and 1-496, and in that portion of the western half of the Township lying between the Grand River
~anch·Mt; .,, Ho.pe Highway. The low density residential area in the eastern
rpo:i::tt-ion. of,, the_ Township is extensively developed with single family subdivisions. l'he low density residential land use indicated for this · area
is intended to preserve and round out the basic character of exi sting
development. The western half of the Township lying between the Grand
River and Mt. Hope Highway contains a scattering of single-family subdivisions as well as strip residential development located along section line
roads . The existing development, while not complete, constitutes an
em~rging _ pattern of basically low density residential development which
is incorporated in the Future Land Use Plan. The Future Land Use Plan
indicates small areas of low density residential development north of the
Grand River and adjacent to Waverly Road; in the vicinity of Delta Mills;
south of I-496 in the Marcy Road, Guenther Road and Echo Valley Esta,tes
areas; within the community of Millett; south of the Grand .R iver in the
vicinity of Locust Lane; and in the area adjacent to Jolly Road. These
areas of low density residential development were all delineated to round
out existing single-family developments.

Medium Density
Residential Development
total of 739 acres or 3.3 percent of the entire Township is designated
for , medium density residential development. These medium density residential areas are intended to be developed at a maximum density of eleven
dwelling units per acre. It is anticipated that a variety of housing
types will be developed in such areas. Permitting planned unit developments in medium density residential areas will allow for flexibility and
ipnovation in the land development process. It is assumed that these
areas will be adequately served by major thoroughfares and public utility
services. It is recommended that certain limited institutional and nonA

'{:

'

121

�This page was revised April of 1983
- -:.'.1.

Neighborhood Four

···l.i.

The residential developl'lent that exists in this ·,neighlrorhood -ts df; a
low density single family character. A significant amotin't ,~ · vacant
land exists in the northeast and central portions of the neighborhood.
Approximately 100 acres of vacant land between Willow Highwaiy&lt; --an&lt;i'0t,he
Grand River in this neighborhood is presently in -agriculnu~a1, pto-d~ction.
The Great Lakes Bible College Campus is located in the center of this
neighborhood. The proposed east-west collector street.(will -t tr:ave-rie
the center of this neighborhood~ . P-rovisions should ·l).e mades7to &lt;irts--'u late
this roadway as. much as poss•ible sfrom the Melody Acres S.t1bdiii;l-siottr to
the south and from anticipated residential development to' th-e· rt(j:r·1!h.

.. \. ,':. r.

1·

..

'

... .! 1 .,,

This entire neighborhood is ·1oca:ted' within the Grand Ledge Schoo!l;T ,D:istrict with the Waverly/Grand Ledge School District boundary serving as
this neighborhood's eas tem boundary.
. ' : ·,''.
•. · •-

T

The majority of this neighborhood:: lies within the Watson and Wa'tSbn
Some portions of this district, parti"cularly the
:..,: :; G.arfield Avenue Branch, have experienced persistent flooding ·pr,ob:lems
1 .in the past.
The Watson ang Watson Drain generally lies wi1:hin~- the
- · Creyts Road., right-of-way and empties into the Grand Rive-rc.
,. ,.
-~.
no.t.
n·· Sanitary sewer and water service is generally available th.r:oughout '· this
neighborhood. A sanitary sewer pumping station is · located on~ the nbrth
side: of Olde River Trail within the Delta Mills Subdiv-ision.f r.Water: Well
Number Six is located southeast of the intersection· of -Crey'ts· Rdad and
Willow Highway. A water well is presently planned on the north side of
Willow Highway, west of Rockdale Avenue.
-''
J.,c--·.

.. z..,_ :Dl!ainage District.

A low density residential development classification is recommended for
t.his neighborhood in order to preserve the character of existing- residential areas and also due to the fact that the existing utility systems
and roadway facilities in this area are adequate to serve this':':.-type of
development.
ri~:
-1 .. i t
~

f

·~

Neighborhood Five
The majority of this neighborhood presently consists of vacant land with
the exception of the Willow Woods, Robbins Acres and Armstrong Hills Subdivisions and dispersed single-family housing along Willow Highway, Canal Road, and Old River Trail. The existing land use pattern in the
developed portions of this neighborhood is low density residential
development.

i::i . .,

•(

Delta Mills Park is located in the northeast portion of this neighborhood.
This 32 acre facility was Delta Township's first park facility - antl offers
a picnic shelter, softball fields, tennis courts, a basketball court,
fishing and canoe launching.
, ,. --

Sanitary sewer service is generally not available to the westernmost portion of the neighborhood at this time. The eastenmos t portion°: 0f the
.,. neighborhood is presently served by sanitary sewer service. Water service is generally available in this area. A Township well site is located
northeast of the intersection of Canal Road and Willow Highway.
0

128

�r

This page was revised April of 1983
"'.'&gt;.

_l (--

The Delta Township Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on the north
side of Willow Highway within this neighborhood. This facility, loc~ted on a 25 acre site, presently provides secondary treatment of
s ewage. Planned improvements to the plant include flow equalization,
' odo
r -, control and tertiary treatment.
r,
A low density residential classification is recommended for the neighborhood due to the establishea low density residential land use pattern and the general availability of utilities in the area.
Neighborhood Six
Neighborhood six is characterized by vast amo\lllts of vacant land and
single family residences along Creyts and Canal Roads. The only existing subdivisions in this neighborhood are the Earlington Estates
Subdivision in the extreme eastern portion .of the neighborhood and the
Riyerdale Acres Subdivision in the northwest corner of the neighbor·nood . The Willow Creek residential condominiums are located on the
sou t h side of Willow Highway immediately west of Carrier Creek.
The proposed east-west collector road will traverse the center of this
neighborhood. Proposed development in the center of Section Ten should
be required to execute the necessary documents to reserve the needed
right-of-way for the proposed facility. Efforts should be made to provide for a non-motorized transportation corridor adjacent to the Carrier
Creek which could commence at Willow Highway and continue southwardly.
This neighborhood is primarily served by the 36 inch Carrier Creek Sanitary Sewer Interceptor which traverses the center of the neighborhood in
a north-south direction. Thus, lands within Section Nine, located west
of Canal Road, are presently without sanitary sewer service. Sewer
lines within Creyts Road serve the easternmost portion of the neighborhood . Public water service is generally available throughout the neighborhood.

\

A

9\

129

�This page was revised April of 1983
by the Myers and Henderson Drainage District while the central portion
is served by the Decke Drainage District and the southwest area is served
by the Munton Drainage District.
This neighborhood is bordered by Onieda Township to the west. The Eaton
County Development Plan illustrates parks and open space uses for the
majority of land in Section 24 of Onieda Township while a small area is
classified as rural non-agricultural uses.
In December of 1982 Michigan's Transportation Commission chang:~it the proposed routing of I-69 from the "original alignment" whihh': tra·ii~t=sed Sections 20, 29, and 30 within Delta Township. The CommisJion"·' a.eiided to upgrade 16.4 miles of existing U.S. 27 to freeway status between· Lansing and
Charlotte.
,1 ·, l
!
...

,

•

,.

~ I

(1'

)

'

The Michigan Department of Transportation has acquired approx::µil.ately 106
acres in Section 20 (neighborhood 27), 120 acres in Section 29 and 260
acres in Section 30 (neighborhood 28). At some time in the f~ture the
Department will inevitably dispose of properties in neighborhoods 27 and
28 which it no longer has a need for.
The proposed extension of Broadbent Road to Mt. Hope Highway will inevit, ably be delayed due to the change in routing of I-69.
~

A low density residential land use pattern is recommended
Twenty Seven for the following reasons:

for

~~ighborhood
J

1.

A low density single family residential land use pattern has already
been established in the area due to the existence of £.he Coµntryside
Estates and Evergreen Heights Subdivisions.

2.

There are several areas in this neighborhood where soil conditions
would not be conducive to the construction of conunercial or mulitple
family buildings.

3.

This neighborhood is located several miles from existing and proposed fire service facilities. Therefore, land uses wµich require
significant fire flows should be discouraged in this area.

~-i

Neighborhood Twenty Eight
The majority of land in this neighborhood is vacant with the exception
of several single-family residences located along section line roads.
It is estimated that approximately 2400 acres of land within this neighborhood are currently in agricultural production. All of the neighborhood is located within the Grand Ledge School District.
The neighborhood presently lacks public sewer and water service. The
extension of public water and sewer service is not planned for this area
in the near future. The entire neighborhood is served by designated
county drainage districts. The easternmost portion of the neighborhood
is served by the Dann Drainage District, the McCalpin Drainage District
and the Moon and Hamilton Drainage District. The western portion of the
neighborhood is served by the Munton Drainage district, the Thornapple
Extension Drainage District, the Decke Drainage District and the Fox
Drainage District.

148

�,

·'·

'\.

I

-

This page was revised April of 1983
Most of the soils in this area are very conducive to agricultural uses.
These soils also present severe limitations for urban type development
due to poor septic tank percolation, poor compaction and load bearing
capacity and the fact that they are susceptible to frost action.
The Delta Township Parks, Open Space and Recreation Plan recommends
that a community park site be obtained somewhere in this neighborhood
tn order to serve the long range recreation needs of residents in the
southwest portion of Delta Township. Delta Township owns twenty acres
of land on the north side of Millett Highway adjacent to I-96 which is
planned to be used as a future cemetery site.
This neighborhood is bordered by Onieda Township to the west and Windsor
Township to the south. The Eaton County Development Plan depicts parks
and open space uses within Sections 25 and 36 of Onieda Township. The
Windsor Township Comprehensive Development Plan depicts agricultural
land uses for those areas within Sections 4, 5 and 6 which abut Neighborhood Twenty Eight.
An agricultural land use classification is recommended for all of Sec-

tio~s 29, 30, 31 and 32 for the following reasons:
l. , The, soils in this area are most conducive to agricultural activities.

2.

~

3.

Public utility service is not planned for this area in the near
future.

agricultural land use pattern has been firmly established in this
area.

A very low density residential classification is recommended for the
remainder of Neighborhood Twenty Eight for the following reasons:
1.

A very low density single-family residential land use pattern has
been established in this area.

2.

The relatively flat topography within the eastern portion of Neighborhood Twenty Eight presents problems in adequately handling storm
water runoff generated by urban type development.

3.

Public utility service is not planned for this area in the near
future.

4.

The section line, gravel surfaced roadways in this area could not
safely accommodate the higher volumes of traffic which are associated with higher densities of residential developments.

149

�This page was revised April of 1983

.V

Office Development
Two large office development areas are described in the Future Land Use
Plan. The first is located north and south of West Saginaw Highway between Canal Road and Carrier Creek. The second is located ih the ·vicinity of the Creyts Road/I-496 Interchange. The West Saginaw Highway office development area contains approximately 125 acres while thiF Creyts
Road office area contains approximately 210 acres. Both proposed office
development areas are directly a&lt;ijacent to interstate highway· int'erchanges
and are effectively linked with the entire Lansing metropolitan area as
well as other portions of the State of Michigan. These two offi~e development areas should provide sites which are particularly attractive to
companies desiring state and regional headquarters office complexes. The
two office development areas, as delineated, are large enough in size
and of appropriate shape to permit the design of integrated office parks
or campus-lik~ developments with internal circulation and parking systems
as well as attractive on-site landscaping. Because of the location of
the office facilities in close proximity to · residential housini areas
and their ready accessibility to the interstate highway system interchanges, congestion during peak traffic hours in the vicinity of these
- developments should be minimized.

(

Office development is also recommended adjacent to Waverly Road between
Saginaw Highway and St. Joe Highway. The area bounded by Saginaw on the
north, Waverly Road on the east, Michigan Avenue on the south, and Dibble
Boulevard on the west is experiencing a gradual transition in land use.
Although there are a number of residences in this area, a non-residential
land use pattern is recommended for the future due to the following factors:
1.

A mixed land use pattern presently exists in this area consisting
of commercial/office uses and low density to high density residential uses. Encouraging office development in the area would
establish a single land use pattern and prevent· conflicts between competing uses.

2.

Public
office
equate
office
drains

3.

The lots in the Parkview Acres Subdivision which front on Waverly
Road generally have 350 feet of depth. Thus, these lots are
large enough to accommodate physical improvements necessitated
by office land uses such as buffer strips, service drives, parking areas, storm drainage detention areas, etc .

4.

The area is no longer desirable as a residential neighborhood due
to the high traffic volUliles on Waverly Road and the resultant
negative impacts such as noise, aesthetics and vehicle emissions.
In spite of the fact that a significant number of vacant parcels

sewer and water service in this area is adequate to serve
land uses. Storm drains in this area are presently inadto serve office land uses and thus it is recommended that
land uses not be authorized absent improvements to the
or the utilization of on-site detention measures.

150

-

�exist adjacent to Waverly Road, a single family residence has
not been constructed with frontage on Waverly Road for more
than fifteen years.
5.

Such factors as a close-in location to the greater Lansing metropolitan area, frontage and visibility on an arterial street, and
the existence of an interstate freeway interchange less than one
and a half miles away make this area attractive to office land
uses.

6.

A stable single-family residential neighborhood exists in the
Clairborne Heights Subdivision immediately to the west of the
aforementioned area. The establishment of office land uses
along Waverly Road will serve as a transitional area between
Waverly Road and the low density residential area to the west.

The three block area which is bordered by Michigan Avenue on the north,
St. Joe Highway to the south, Waverly Road to the east, and Hume Boulevard to the west consists of a mixture of commercial, office and singlefamily residential uses. Although there are a number of single-family
res~dences located in this area, an office land use pattern is recommended for the following reasons:
1.

This area is not a viable residential neighborhood for the following reasons:
a. The lots in this area generally consist of approximately 6600
square feet which pres en ts difficulties when attempting to locate a 1,000-1,200 square feet residence on these properties.
b. The high traffic volumes on Waverly Road make it extremely
difficult for residents to ingress and egress from properties in this area in addi tian to the roadway's negative impacts such as noise and poor aesthetics.
c. The existing mixed land use pattern in the area has resulted
in inevitable incompatibilities and conflicts between land
uses.

2.

Designating an office land use pattern in the area would permit
developers to assemble enough parcels together to form sites
which would be large enough to accommodate office development.
Parcels at least a third to a half acre in size would be required due to front setback requirements on Waverly Road, and
the need for transitional buffer strips and storm water detention areas.

3.

The area is attractive for office land uses due to the visibility
and access provided by arterial roads such as Waverly Roa.cl, Uichigan Avenue and St. Joe Highway.
This area is also located in
close proximity to the I-496/Waverly Road interchange which affords
excellent access to the greater Lansing metropolitan area.

The recommendation for office land uses in these two areas is made
with the following qualifications:

151

�This page was revised April of 1983

r

tion of a few large industries within an area could significantly increase the amount of industrial development in that area and thereby
increase the amount of land required.
., 1
It is reconnnended that the Township encourage the establishment of
planned industrial parks within industrial areas.
, ,. ,. ' •
9.

"With the exception of very large plants and those that re-:.-,,,
quire free-standing sites because of their need to be close ,~,
to raw material sources or because of their incompatibility
with other plants, industrial parks provide the most advan~
tageous locations because they are designed to meet the requirements of modern industries. Operating efficiencies can .-be gained and conflicts with neighbors can be avoided when ·an
area is especially planned to accommodate industrial development. Interdependent plants can take advantage of opportunities to cluster in close proximity. If an industrial park
in an urban area is sufficiently large and intensively developed, it will be able to obtain transit service which can
result in significant cost savings both directly for employees and indirectly for employers." (Source: The Practice of Local
Government Planning, International City Management Association,
1979, page 265.)
In addition, industrial parks generally result in fewer curb .cuts and
identification signs on arterial roads than do individual lot by lot
developments. Since the businesses in industrial parks ·are . concentrated, it is often easier to cooperatively provide for such needs as
storm water detention and rail service.
VIII Parks, Open Space and Recreation Facilities Development
In 1978 the Delta Township Parks and Recreation Connnission prepared a
Parks, Open Space and Recreation Plan for the Township. The plan contains an inventory of existing park facilities, notes deficiencies in the
parks system based on accepted recreation standards, contains a goals
statement, and concludes with a parks and recreation master plan. The
Parks and Open Space Plan and the Comprehensive Plan are well coordinated in that they utilize the same population projections and neighborhood units. Rather than attempt to duplicate the contents and recommendations contained within the Parks and Open Space Plan, the Land Use
Plan depicts the future parks and open space sites which are illustrated
on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Figure LU-III depicts private
and public park facilities in the Township as well as designating four
green belts.
The four major green belts depicted serve two purposes. First, the
green belts reflect one hundred year flood plain areas and attempt
to preserve these areas in their natural state as much as possible.
Secondly, these green belts are intended to be used to screen intensive industrial uses from less intensive residential uses
The Carrier Creek Green Belt
The Carrier Creek Green Belt begins at the Grand River and continues three
miles to the south to Mt. Hope Highway. This area has the potential to

158

..

�~(CJ

~

(
~'---'

(

/'

TOWNSHIP

DELTA
PARKS

AND

PUBLIC

GREEN

BELTS

PARKS

ANDERSON
2

DELTA

MILLS

3

ERICKSON

4

GRAND

WOODS (City of Lansing)

5

HAWK

MEADOWS

OI

....

lf"I

Q)

bO

Ill

p..
6

LELAND

H
H
H

7

LOOTENS

~

8

SHARP

CJ PRIVATE
L

,

,

,/&lt;://
,

/

/--i·- ----:-'

,
...... _ .,,,"'

,I

l\()d

/

CITY Of
LANSING

I

Q)

~

RECREATIONAL AREAS

~

9

INGHAM COUNTY CONSERVATION LEAGUE

10

WOLDUMAR NATURE CENTER

GREEN

BELTS

A

CARRIER CREEK

B

MT. HOPE HIGHWAY

C

NORTH GRAND RIVER

D

SOUTH GRAND RIVER

-

;:I
bO
•.-l

NORTH

FIGURE

LU 111

�' r

offer a myriad of recreational opportunities, ranging from a casual
picnic lunch for adjacent residents or office workers to an all-day
hiking or bicycling outing. It is anticipated that the majority of the
open space, which will be preserved adjacent to the Carrier Creek, will
lie within the 100-year flood plain due to the fact that the Townsh~p__
Zoning Ordinance prohibits permanent structures within such areas. It
is recommended that a minimum distance of 50 feet from either side of
the Creek be preserved for the open space corridor. The 100 feet wide
open space corridor should provide adequate space to accommoda te bicycle paths and pedestrian walkways in the area. Fences and other
structural facilities which obstruct access to the open space area
should be discouraged.
1

It should be noied that the Carrier Creek, between the Grand River and
I-496 is established as the Moon and Hamilton County Drain and · is under
the jurisdiction of the Eaton County Drain Commissioner. S~nce the
Carrier Creek serves as a county drain, its primary purpose is ~to provide a storm water runoff outlet for properties within the storm drainage district. There will be a need to periodically clean and maintain
the drainage channel which could impact the natural vegetation in the
area.
It is hoped that land owners and developers adjacent to the Carrier
Creek will voluntarily enter into open space agreements with the Township to assure the preservation of the area in its ~atural state. It
would be cost prohibitive for the Township to attempt to purch~,sP J.and
adjacent to the Carrier Creek for the purpose of reserving the land as
-open space.
North Grand River
Green Belt
The second major open space area runs north and south of the Grand River
between Royston Road on the west and Webster Street on · the east. This
area has excellent potential for development of day use facilities and
water oriented recreation. The Carrier Creek green belt and the north
Grand River green belt are linked at a common point and could provide
the opportunity for continuous hiking and bicycling.
South Grand River
Green Belt
The third major green belt is located between Lansing Road and the south
course of the Grand River and contains the Anderson Nature Park and
Woldumar Nature Center . The short-range improvements which are planned
for Anderson Nature Park include fencing the perimeter of the site, upgrading existing nature trails, improving Wardell Road and the installation of an off-road parking area. Long-range improvements include the
construction of a building to accommodate the proposed nature interpretation program. Continued efforts should be made to coordinate Anderson
Nature Park's development and programming with the Woldumar Nature Center.
Mt. Hope Highway
Green Belt
\.

The fourth major green belt is located along the south side of Mt. Hope

160

�~

- -

- ·

This page was revised April of 1983

Highway between I-96 and U.S. 27. The purpose of this green belt is
to provide an effective separation between the planned industrial uses
on the south side of Mt. Hope Highway and the residential uses to the
north. It is recommended that the green belt have a minimum width of
50 feet and that it be landscaped with trees and shrubbery. Due to
the relatively narrow width of the green belt, it is assumed that the
area will serve passive recreational pursuits rather than active recreational uses. Consideration should be given to the installation of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway in this area which could serve workers who
live in close proximity to the industrial tract.
Private Development of
Open Space Areas
It is anticipated that portions of each of the recommended green belts
will be developed and maintained as private or commercial recreation
facilities. Such facilities could include golf courses, sportsmen's
clubs, nature study preserves and various kinds of commercial recreation facilities which will maintain the natural beauty of the green belt
areas while not disrupting their continuity.

IX Proposed Thoroughfare Improvements
Figure LU-IV illustrates improvements proposed for Delta Township's
thoroughfare network. The thoroughfare improvements illustrated in Fig. ure LU-IV are designed to either correct deficiencies in the existing
thoroughfare network or to serve the land development pattern contained
in the Comprehensive Plan.
Table LU-2 contains a description of each proposed thoroughfare improvement and a summary of the primary purposes the proposed improvement is
intended to fulfill. Cost estimates have not been provided due to the
volatile nature of road construction costs. Funding for many of the proposed projects is expected to be provided by federal monies, specifically
Federal Aid to Urban Systems Funds, and non-federal sources such as the
MDOT and Eaton County Road Commission. The road improvement projects do
not appear in order of priority.
X

Community Facilities
The community facilities classification on the future land use map,
Figure LU-I, designates a number of public and semi-public institutional
uses such as schools, cemeteries and governmental complexes. Churches
are not included in this classification since they are typically located
in residential neighborhoods. A review of the various community facilities within Delta Township is presented in the following chapter.

161

�--

Q

z
&lt;

Q,.

(

~

t- en

WI-

%

u,

w&lt;J

z

~
0

I-

,c
I..J

w

Q

&gt;
•

a:~
t-o
cna:

I-

(J

w
-,
0

a:
a.
Q

w

..J

.=

U,c(

G)

o:e

en
a.
0
a:
a.

C,

Oc,

I

LI.

~%

::)

·-

Q~

W&gt;

~%

a:-

0

'

I

I

\

I
\

I

\

\
\

\

\

\
\

\
\
\
\

''
' '' \
\

\

\

'
' '' ' '
I

.._

I

'

II

' \

\

I
' \

II
\

I
I

I

I
I

I
I

I

I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I:

Figure LU-IV

Page 162

I

I

I

I

ii
\

�This page was revised April of 1983

TABLE LU-2
PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
NAME
Elmwood Dr.

Willow Highway

Interstate· 69

LENGTH

PROPOSED
Ilfi'ROVEMENTS

PRD!AR.Y

(MILES)

LOCATION

.5

Saginaw Hwy. to
Michigan Ave.

New construction/reconstruction, realignment, widen to four
lanes, install turn
lanes.

Eliminate
through traffic from a
residential
neighborhood,
improve circulation

Waverly Rd. to
Canal Rd.

Resurfacing, drainage
outlet, additional lanes
at selected points

Improve condition of existing roadway
surface

Not Available

Construction of an
expressway, connection
to I-96

Provides connection to
major midwestern
metropolitan
areas and the
Stace Capitol
of Michigan Ir\
and Indiana

3.5

Not
Available

PURPOSE(S)

h

St. Joe Hwy.

1.0

Creyts Rd. to
Canal Rd.

Reconstruction, correct
vertical alignment,
additional lanes at
selected points

163

Improve traffic
circulation and
traf £ ic carrying capacity

�'11111111
This pages was revised April of 1983

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

r

The Conmnmity Facilities Component of the Comprehensive Plan consists of
five parts. In Part I Township offices and departments are analyzed and
a brief description is given of major Township buildings. Part II contains a review of police protection services which are contractually
provided to the Township by the Eaton County Sheriff's Department. The
discussion examines the level of existing police service and describes
future law enforcement needs. Part III consists of an evaluation of
Township fire protection needs. Existing fire facilities are analyzed
and future needs are reviewed. Part IV consists of a review of existing library service provided to Township residents. Finally, Part V
contains an analysis of existing and future school faci l ity needs of
the Waverly and Grand Ledge School Districts.

I

Governmental Offices and Departments
Table CF-1 contains a listing of
ings. The listing only includes
does not include such facilities
structures or other buildings of

the major Delta Township owned buildthe larger Township structures and
as well houses, lift stations, park
less than 1,000 square feet.

The Delta Township Administration Building is the most prominent Township owned structure. The building contains the offices of the Township Clerk as well as the Building, Accounting, Engineering, Planning,
Parks and Assessing Departments. The Administration Building is almost fully occupied at the present time. It is anticipated that additional space will be needed to house Township administrative offices
within the next ten years.
It is reconnnended that a Township space needs study be undertaken in
the future. The purpose of the study would be to conduct an inventory
of existing Township floor space, analyze manpower needs, and provide
a projection of future space requirements for Township governmental
functions.
II

Police Protection
The Police Department is responsible for the safety and security of the
Township. The Department regularly patrols Township thoroughfares as
well as commercial, industrial and residential areas. Other responsibilities of the Police Department include the serving of warrants, subpoenas and other forms of legal process, execution of court orders and
transport of offenders to the Eaton County Sheriff's Department. Table
CF-2 illustrates the workload of the Delta Patrol Division for the past
seven years.

169

�This page was revised April of 1983
TABLE CF-1
INVENTORY OF MAJOR DELTA TOWNSHIP OWNED BUILDINGS
Building

Square
Footage

Primary Use

Administration Building

Houses the majority of
Township departments

Parks Department Building

Date of
Construction

10,600

1970

Parks maintenance
equipment is stored
and repaired here

1,900
1,400

1973
1977

Water Department Building

Houses Water Department offices, well
controls and monitoring equipment, and
maintenance equipment

3,300
1,400

1970
1982

Wastewater Treatment
Building

Contains the Wastewater
Treatment Department
offices, laboratory and
monitoring equipment
and an incinerator

8,000

1971

Fire Station One

Houses Delta Township
Fi.re Department

3,700

1956

Fire Station Two

Houses fire fighting
equipment

2,600

1979

Sheriff's Department
Sub-Station

Houses the Eaton County
Sheriffs Department's
Delta Patrol Division

2,900

1982

Waverly Library

Houses the Waverly
Branch of the Ingham
County Library

11,400

Remodeled
in 1982

TABLE CF-2
DELTA PATROL DIVISION ACTIVITIES
1976-1982
1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

7,199

6,982

7,554

8,590

7,927

7,631

7,482

Total Accidents

853

924

1, 141

1,206

836

869

934

Total Arrests

719

495

322

575

876

856

1,042

2,821

1,981

3,164

2,748

3,594

4,409

4,372

Total Calls for Service

Total Traffic Tickets

170

�-

Existing Service
/
/

Delta Township has contracted with the Eaton County Sheriff's Department
for police protection since 1970. There are six patrol cars and twentyone employees which are permanently assigned to the Delta sub-station.
In 1982 the police force moved into a new 2900 sq. ft. building on
Administrative Drive.
At the present time there is one lieutenant, two sergeants, one secretary and seventeen patrol deputies employed at the Delta Township substation. Additionally, a detective is based in Charlotte. The police
department presently does not man the sub-station on a twenty-four
hour basis. All calls at all hours are dispatched through the Eaton
County Sheriff's office in Charlotte.
Future Needs
Police service is generally proivded by dividing the geographic area
of the community into patrol districts. The factors determining the
size of districts include cirme rates, overall size, geographic conditions, traffic conditions, population densities and response times~
The Delta Patrol Division has divided the Township into four service
districts.
There are no uniform "need for services" standards available for police
service because these factors vary significantly from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction. The national average for police service is presently 1.6
officers per 1,000 residents. The present ratio in Delta Township is
approximately .8 officer per 1,000 residents.
Although additional manpower was added to the Delta Township Patrol
Division in 1982, continuing demands for police service preclude little
specialization in order to cover investigation activities. More personel is needed for a wide variety of required specialties such as
juvenile officer, traffic specialists, full time worthless document
investigator and additional command/administration personnel.

171

�This page was revised April of 1983
III

Fire Protection
Personnel
Prior to 1970 the Fire Department was staffed by a fire chief and volunteers. At the present time the Fire Department staff consists of a
fire chief, a dispatcher, nine full-time fire fighters and twenty five
volunteers. Three full-time fire fighters are available at all times
at Station One. When a fire alarm is received the full time fire
fighters take the fire engines to the scene and the volunteers, who
are alerted by radio, respond to the scene.
In 1979 the voters of Delta Township approved a millage issue of onehalf mill for the operation of a paramedic unit within the Township.
A paramedic staff of three trained individuals now operates under the
direction of the Township Fire Chief. Presently one trained paramedic
is available at all times. A fully equipped ambulance was purchased
in 1979 which is utilized primarily for paramedic activities.
Service
Table CF-3 illustrates Fire Department responses and Township fire losses
for the past seven years. This table does not include such departmental
activities as building inspections and mutual aid requests.
TABLE CF-3
DELTA TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT
RESPONSES AND FIRE LOSSES
1976-1982
1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

76
28
57

86
36
63

61
21
63

57
21

so

56
15
50

61
39
54

64
34
61

Vehicle Fires

41

49

48

30

32

37

41

Ambulance Assists

14

30

35

49

101

91

59

155
66
15
6

35
8
2
14

107
1.5
15
6

117*

23
500
337

Fire Alarms
Single Family Dwellings
Multiple Family Dwellings
Businesses

Estimated Fire Losses (Thousand Dollars)
Single Family Dwellings
Multiple Family Dwellings
Businesses
Vehicle

60
106
16
17

68
1
7
4

*Total 1981 estimated loss all categories -- breakdown unavailable.

172

13

�Existing Facilities
Station One is located northwest of the intersection of Canal Road and
Saginaw Highway. The station consists of 3,700 square feet and occupies a
32,000 square foot site. The facility contains a kitchen, a living
room, and bedroom which are utilized by the full-time firemen. The
equipment which is housed at Station One includes two pumper trucks,
a ladder truck, a mini-pumper truck, a water tank truck, a compressor/
generator truck, two ambulances, the fire chief's car and a jeep which
which is utilized for grass fires.
Fire Station One is well located with respect to the proposed Township
development pattern. Access is available to both Canal Road and Saginaw Highway from Station One. The fact that the Station One site consists of less than three-quarters of an acre limits future building
expansion.
Station Two is located on the south side of Lansing Road immediately
south of Millett Highway. The station consists of 2,600 square feet
and occupies a 1.2 acre site. This facility is presently tmmanned.
The equipment which is housed at Station Two consists of two pumper
trucks.

f
~

.(

.

~

The location of Fire Station Two provides protection to that portion
of the Township lying between the Grand Trtmk Western Railroad Tracks
and the south course of the Grand River. Most of this area is within
a one mile travel distance of Station Two. Apparatus stationed at
this facility occasionally experiences difficulty entering U.S. 27.
Traffic on the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Tracks impedes movement of
fire apparatus to the Township's industrial tract at crucial moments.
Fire Facility Location Criteria
The Insurance Services Office has developed criteria for the location
of fire stations. Locational criteria are based upon fire flow requirements for various types and densities of development. Fire flow
requirements are the minimum number of gallons of water per minute
(GPM) that would be required to extinguish fires. Fire flow requirements for most types of development range from a low of 500 GPM for
single family residences separated from other buildings by a distance
of 100 feet or more to a high of 12,000 GPM for very large, high hazard industrial facilities. Certain types of industrial or warehousing
facilities such as oil refineries or lumber yards might have fire flow
requirements in excess of 12,000 GPM.
Precise computation of fire flow requirements for various types of development is a complex procedure which involves an evaluation of many
details of building construction siting as well as on-site fire protection equipment. Generally, fire flow requirements increase in
direct proportion to increases in the intensity of land use.

In selecting fire station locations, consideration should be given to
access problems created by topographical and man-made barriers. In

173

�This page was revised April of 1983

Delta Township, expressways and railroads form important man-made barriers
which will affect the effective deployment of fire fighting equipment.
The Grand River forms a natural barrier which will also affect the deployment of fire fighting equipment. The existence of the I-96 and I-496
expressways make it ncessary to select fire station locations in close
proximity to the arterials which cross these expressways.
Proposed Fire Station Locations
Figure CF-I indicates the general location of the seven fire stations
proposed to serve the development pattern contained in the Future
Land Use Plan. Fire Stations Number One and Two are shown in the
same area in which they are presently located. Plans for the development of Fire Station Number Three are already underway. The Township
should acquire property at the other five locations as soon as practical to ensure the balanced distribution of facilities needed to provide a high level of fire protection. Construction of facilities
should be paced to coincide with Township development. Furthermore,
facilities should not be constructed absent assurances that the necessary personnel will exist to properly staff such facilities. The numbers which identify each of the following proposed facilities do not
indicate a priority for the construction of the fire stations.
Fire Station Number One
It is recommended that Fire Station One continue to operate at its
present location. Although the small size of the site limits expansion,
the location of this facility should provide excellent protection for
the Township Administration Building, the office areas located on Saginaw Highway east of Canal Road and the high density housing areas
located to the north and south of Saginaw Highway. This facility
should provide good secondary protection to the entire northern portion of the Township as well as to the southern portion of the
Township adjacent to Canal Road.
Fire Station Number Two
It is _recommended that Fire Station Two continue to operate at its
present location. The existing structure has been designed -so that
it will accommodate a full range of modern facilities. Sufficient
room exists on this site to train firefighters and provide for building expansion. Fire Station Two should provide excellent protection
for the area between Lansing Road and the Grand River. This facility
will also provide a secondary means of fire protection for the eastern
portion of Delta Township's industrial tract.
Fire Station Number Three
Delta Township presently owns a one and one-half acre site on the north
side of Mt. Hope Highway, immediately west of the General Motors Parts
Warehouse, which is envisioned as a future fire station site. Providing improved fire protection to the industrial tract should be a high
Township priority. Fire Station Three will provide good protection to

174

-~-----..;.._------ --~-~

~

�Q

w

u,
0

a.

t'

·'

~

0.

0

:c
Cl)

z
==
0
~

a:

Q.u,

-.
LL.

0

-c
~

-I

w

Q

...
G)
~

a,
LL.

·-

Cz

Zo

&lt;I-

(J)
(J)

z

--

0

IC
I-

C,

z

-&gt;w&lt;

I-

ZI-

(J)

-a:
&gt;&lt;WI.

0

IC
I(J)

(J)

C,c(

-u,
IU,W

.Z

•

Q

w

(J)

0

ii

CL

0
a:

CL

0

. ..
....
....-~
Qa,

....

I
I

\

I
\

'

I

\

\\

\\
'' ' '
' \
'' '
' ''
' ' ' '-

\ ',,
I

' \

I

I

/

\,
\

I
I I
I I
I

I

J

Figure CF-I

Page 175

I

I

I

I

I

�This page was revised April of 1983

the northeastern po_rtion of Delta Township's industrial tract, most of
which would lie within a one mile travel distance. Good protection
would also be provided to the multi-family residential and commercial
development proposed for the area adjacent to the interchange of Creyts
Road and I-496. Fire Station Three would provide secondary protection
to the low density residential areas between Michigan Avenue and I-496.
Fire Station Number Four
Delta Township presently owns seventeen acres of land on the east side
of Elmwood Road directly south of the Plum Hollow Subdivision. Only
a small portion of the site would be needed to accommodate Fire Station Four • . A two acre alternative site is owned by the Township on the
west side of Elmwood Road immediately south of the St. David's Church
site and adjacent to Sharp Park. Either of these sites would provide
excellent protection for the Delta central business district, most of
which is located within a one mile travel distance. The sites would
also provide good protection for the strip commercial development on
Saginaw Highway east of the central business district. Station Four
would provide secondary protection to most of the northeast portion of
the Township.
Fire Station Number Five
It is proposed that Fire Station Five be located adjacent to Willow
Highway in close proximity to Looten's Park. Such a location would
allow Fire Station Five to provide good protection to the low density
housing areas located between Willow Highway and the Grand River.
Such a site would also provide good protection to the Hayes School
complex located at Nixon Road and Willow Highway. Fire Station Five
should provide good protection to most residential areas north of Saginaw Highway and west of I-96.
Fire Station Number Six
It is proposed that Fire Station Six be located near the intersection
of Nixon Road and St. Joe Highway. Such a location would provide good
protection to all single family residential areas located between Saginaw Highway and Davis Highway.
Fire Station Number Seven
It is proposed that Fire Station Seven be located in the vicinity of the
Canal Road/Millett Highway intersection. This location would place
most of the southwestern portion of the Township's industrial tract
within a one mile travel distance of Station Seven.

Fire Protection Deficiencies
While the indicated distribution of seven fire stations should provide
the Township with excellent fire protection, there are three primary
areas which are not ideally protected. The most important of these is
Delta Mills and the low density residential area penetrated by Delta
I

176

�This page was revised April of 1983

Township residents are also presently served by the Grand Ledge Public
Library and the Lansing Public Library. The Grand Ledge Library is
located on Jefferson Street in Grand Ledge and the Lansing Library is
located on South Capitol Avenue in Lansing.

•
/

V

School Facilities
Delta Township is served by four school districts as illustrated in
Figure CF-II . The Grand Ledge and Waverly School Districts serve the
major portion of the Township while the Lansing and Holt School Districts serve relatively small areas.
Grand Ledge School Facilities

I

I

The Grand Ledge School District, which serves the western portion of
Delta Township, encompasses a large, primarily rural, service area.
The district covers approximately 125 square miles distributed over
several townships and three counties. Providing service to students
distributed over such a large area necessitates daily bus runs of
approximately 3,500 miles. Because of the extensive bussing necessitated by the size and population density of the district, school
attendance areas have not been rigidly delineated. Instead, bussing
has been utilized as a flexible tool which allows balanced classroom
sizes throughout the school district.
TABLE CF-4
ENROLLMENT IN THE GRAND LEDGE
PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
1971-1982
Year
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976

Year

Enrollment
5,646
5,766
5,929
5,995
5,978
5,884

1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982

Enrollment
5,838
5,711
5,652
5,481
5,220
4,991

Table CF-4 illustrates student enrollment trends in the Grand Ledge
School District for the 1971-1982 period. Student enrollments increased
annually from 1971 until they peaked in 1974 after which time they have
annually declined.
Waverly School Facilities
The Waverly School District, which covers the eastern portion of Delta
Township, serves a primarily suburban service area. The entire district
covers approximately 22 square miles, more than two-thirds of which is

179

�This page was revised April of 1983
located in Lansing and Delta Townships and the remainder of which is
distributed between Watertown and Windsor Townships. The school district bus runs cover approximately 840 miles a day. The school district has attempted to develop a pattern of neighborhood schools where
practical and to rely on bussing where rural densities exist.
Table CF-5 illustrates student enrollment trends in the Waverly School
District for the 1971-1982 period. Student enrollments declined annually
throughout this period.
TABLE CF-5
ENROLLMENT IN THE WAVERLY
PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
1971-1982
Year
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976

Year

Enrollment
5,047
4,884
4,753
4,614
4,454
4,332

1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982

Enrollment
4,142
4,079
3,852
3,650
3,539
3,395

~

Waverly School District facilities located in Delta Township serve Delta
Township students as well as students located in other portions of the
District. Further, some Delta Township students are served by facilities
located in Lansing Township. The Waverly High School serves all district high school students. The Waverly East Junior High School, located in Lansing Township, serves all 6th and 7th graders. The three
Waverly elementary schools located in Delta Township serve primarily
Delta Township residents. Delta Township residents are also served by
elementary schools located in the Lansing Township portion of the school
district.

J

.

180

�~

,)

.

~

,,,.•.

.,,.,,, ,,.•"""''••'""""

DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure SS · II
EXISTING &amp; PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE AREA { 1983)

'"rj

I-'•
()Q

i::
11

0

EXISTING SERVICE

8

1983 ·1985

CJ
LJ

1986·1990

•

ro

(/)
(/)

I

II

H
H

'i:l

1991 ·1995
POST 1995
TO BE SERVICED BY
THE CITY OF LANSING

Pl

()Q

ro

.....

0
00

!

1
i]rm!~ ![1i:ll !lli ~l l~ lltli[l
1

,r;~MJ'~)~~'.:~[;~ ;gw¥.Y-.
.................
··········:r
.......... ,

::::::··.;,

0000000000

~=❖:❖:0~P,.£S
~0oJ'0oa°0oJ
~ooooc°cfoof

i?ooloooooo
i:&gt;0OO0O

l~i=:=:❖i

c.

!?;::o~:!i~~:oc ·

=~•

;.. ~:••
.•: •".,·:"

0

1..

1, • "':. ,,
...!l.

~
;'.5

en

-

NORTH

tI1

ti
~

--....

00

~

�IV

Neighborhood Unit Delineation
The residential land use pattern has been organized into twenty-eight
individual neighborhood units. These twenty-eight neighborhood units
are indicated in Figure LU-II. The delineation of neighborhoods was
based on the following factors:

I

I

I

Location of natural or man-made devisive elements
Distinct changes in land use
Population patterns
School district boundaries
Existing land uses
Sewer and water service areas
Census tract boundaries
A brief description of each neighborhood follows.
Neighborhood One
This neighborhood is unique in the Township in that it is located within
the Lansing School District and is also served by the City of Lansing
utility system. The 1975 Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement, which was
entered into by the City and Delta Township, limits the density in this
area to approximately five dwelling units per acre.
The northern portion of Neighborhood One is positioned between a very low
density residential subdivision to the west, being Saratoga Farms, and a
higher density residential development to the east in the City of Lansing,
being Mount Vernon Park. Residential development in this area should provide for a transition between the high density residential areas to the
east and the lower density residential areas to the west.
Delta River Drive bisects this neighborhood in an east-west direction.
This roadway has been designated as a Natural Beauty Road by the Eaton
County Road Commission in compliance with Act 150 of 1970. Due to the
winding nature of Delta River Drive and the fact that sight distances
are limited in this area, developments within this neighborhood should
utilize Waverly Road as their primary access point.
A significant amount of the southern portion of this neighborhood lies
within the one-hundred year flood plain. Development in this area should
be regulated so as to utilize and preserve the natural amenities of this
area and to complement Grand Woods Park which is located on the south
side of the Grand River in Sections One and Two of Delta Township.
The extreme northern portion of this neighborhood lies within flight zones
of the Capital City Airport to the northeast. However, it is expected
that the airport flight zones will not impose a major impact on residential land uses in the area due to the fact that the Capital City Airport
Master Plan reconunends that future air traffic utilize landing strips
further to the north.
This neighborhood is bordered by Watertown Township to the north. The
Clinton County Comprehensive Plan illustrates parks and open space uses
along the northern border of Section One of Delta Township.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this neighborhood due to the readily available access to an arterial road, the
124

�•

=

N

I
I

I\"'
,J

I

."'I'
•

&gt;Z

::x, 0

mz

&gt;·
cnZ

m
C)

:::c
gJ

0

::x,

:::c
0
0

(REVISED 4/8 3)

Figure LU-II

Page 125

C

czc
zmm

--r
-(C)-

-·"T1

(C

...

C

z
a,m

(1)

Ql&gt;
::x, -I
:::c: m

C:

(I) :::c:

0C
0
C

C

m
r
-I
J&gt;

r

-

-I

0

:ez

en
:c

"'C

~
_./

�THE
DELTA
TOWNSHIP
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
1982
prepared

by:

DELTA TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION
7710 WEST SAGINAW HIGHWAY
LANSING, MICHIGAN 48917

�DELTA TOWNSHIP
PLANNING COMMISSION

DELTA TOWNSHIP
BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Ronald Ratajczak
Chairman

Joseph E. Drolett
Supervisor

Terry G. Bladen
Vice Chairman

Barbara Barrett
Clerk

June Johnston
Secretary

Robert Richards
Treasurer

Ronald Brabant
Member

Lyle Brown
Trustee

Barbara Israel
Member

Philip Chisholm
Trustee

Edward Jaye
Member

Daniel Stump
Trustee

Robert LaMoreaux
Member

Gerald Winans
Trustee

Janice Vedder
Member
Jerome Wittkoski
Member

The Comprehensive Plan for the Charter Township of Delta
has been prepared pursuant to Act 285 of 1983, the
"Municipal Planning Commission Act," and became effective
on
July 12,
1982 by unanimous approval of the Charter
Township of Delta Planning Commission.

�CONTENTS
PAGE
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
I.
II.

III.
IV.

v.

VI.
VII.
VIII.

IX.

Community Goals . . .
Residential Development.
Commercial Development •
Industrial Development .
Community Facilities and Services.
Transportation Facilities Development . •
Open Space and Recreation Facilities Development •
Energy . . . • .
The Environment.

GEOGRAPHIC DETERMINANTS . .
I.
II.
III.
IV.

v.

VI.
VII.
VIII.

IX.

Location of Delta Township
Historical Growth of Delta Township.
Climate. • . • . . . • .
. . . .
Geology and Topography.
. ...
Soil Conditions in Delta Township.
Ground Water . • . . • •
Surface Water • • • . . .
Existing Land Use Pattern . . •
Delta Township Land Use Trends (1972-1980)

I.

Population Growth in Delta Township.
Population Projections •

III.

Characteristics of Existing Commercial Development
Projection of Future Commercial Development . . •
Major Findings of the Commercial Base Analysis

I.
III.

12
12

14
15

16
17
17
19
19

24

32

34

36
51
52

Analysis of Delta Township's Existing Industrial Base.
Projection of Future Industrial Development
Potential
••.•
Conclusions • •

OFFICE SPACE ANALYSIS . •
II.

6
8
9
10

34

INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS
I.
II.

3

4
5

24

COMMERCIAL BASE ANALYSIS . .
II.
III.

1
2

12

POPULATION ANALYSIS AND PROJECTIONS.
I.
II.

1

52
55
60

61

Office Types in Delta Township
Office Development Trends . . . •
Determination of Delta Township Office Space
Market • • . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ii

61
61
64

�PAGE
TRANSPORTATION .......... • ...................•.•.•................

66

Historical Development of the Street System ............•
Functional Classification of Existing Street System .....
Truck Operation Classifications ...........•.............
Jurisdiction Over Delta Township Roads ................. .
Financing of Road Improvements .•......•.................
State Trunk Lines ......... . ...........................•.
County Primaries and Locals .......................•.....
Financing Prerogatives ....................•.....•.......
Thoroughfare Cross Sections •............................
Right-of-Way Deficiencies .............................. .
Mass Transit Service in Delta Township ................. .
Railroad Facilities Serving Delta Township ............. .
Air Service to Delta Township .......................... .
Non-Motorized Transportation •...........................

66
66

I.
II.
III.

IV.

v.

VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
XI.

XII.
XIII.
XIV.

72
72
74
74
74
76
76
76
84
85

86
88

WATER SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

90

Historical Information ......................•.........•.
Description of Existing Water Service System ........... .
Future Service Area . . ...............•...................

90
90
95

SANITARY SEWER SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . .

98

Historical Information ••••••••...•....•.•.•.....•••..•..
Description of Existing Sanitary Sewer Collection
and Treatment Facilities ................•.....••........
Future Service Areas for the Wastewater Collection
and Treatment System....................................

98

I.

II.
III.

I.

II.
III.

STORM DRAINAGE. . • • . • . • • • • • • . • • • . . • • • . • • . • • • • • • . • . • . • . . . . • • . . . . • • . .
I.

II.
III.
IV.

Storm Water Design Criteria ............................ .
Inventory of Existing Storm Drainage Facilities ........ .
New Storm Drainage Practices ...................•........
Recommended Storm Drainage Practices .................•..

101
103
109
109

109
111
112

SOLID WASTE

114

FUTURE LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . .

118

The Relationship of Planning to Zoning ..................
Residential Development .................................
Residential Neighborhood Module Concept ..........•......
Neighborhood Unit Delineation ...........................
Office Development...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . .
Commercial Development............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial Development..................................
Parks, Open Space and Recreation Facilities
Development... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proposed Thoroughfare Improvements ...................•..

118
120
123

I.
II.

III.
IV.

v.

VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.

iii

124
150

152
157
158
161

/

�PAGE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

169

Governmental Offices and Departments ................. .
Police Protection .................................... .
Fire Protection ...................................•...
Library Facilities ..........................•.........
School Facilities .................................... .

169
169
179

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN........................

183

Zoning Ordinance ..................................... .
Subdivision Ordinance .......................•.........
Sign Ordinance ...........•............................
Capital Improvement Program .......................... .
Administrative Procedures ............................ .
Program Coordination ................................. .
Federal and State Grants-In-Aide ..................... .
Economic Development Corporation ..................... .
Planning Advisory Services ........................... .
Mapped Improvements Ordinances ....................... .
Public Information Services .......................... .
Revisions to the Comprehensive Plan .•..•..•.•••.••...•

183
183
183
184
184
184
184
185
185
185
185
185

I.

II.
III.

IV.

v.

I.
II.

III.
IV.

v.

VI.

VII.
VIII.
IX.

X.
XI.
XII.

- --------~-

iv

172
177

�TABLES

Table
GD-1
GD-2
P-1
P-2

P-3
P-4
C-1
C-2

C-3

C-4

C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
I-1
I-2

I-3

I-4
I-5
0-1
0-2

0-3

0-4
T-1
T-2

T-3
T-4
T-5

Title

Page

Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1972 - 1980 Land Use Change: Delta Township ..•.............
Comparative Population Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Incremental Population Increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Population Per Household Delta Township 1960-1980 .......... .
Population Projections to the Year 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Five Mile Trade Area Population Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year 2000 Tri-County Projected Per Capita
Retail Expenditure Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . .
Changes in Retail Expenditure Patterns for the
Tri County Region and Eaton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year 2000 Projected Trade Area Retail Expenditures ......... .
Neighborhood and Regional Shopping Centers within
the Tri-County Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proportion o f Total Trade Area Retail Expenditures
Accruing to the Delta Central Business District
in the Year 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail Floor Space Required to Serve 2000 Retail
Expenditure Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~omparison of 1977 and Year 2000 Required Shopping
Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Major Business Establishments Located in Delta
Township's Industrial Tract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tri-County Region Employment Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Projections of Manufacturing and Wholesale Employment
in The Tri-County Area . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Projections of Manufacturing and Wholesale Employment
in the Delta Industrial Tract . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Projected Land Consumption for Manufacturing and
Wholesale Activities in the Delta Industrial Tract ...... .
Distribution of Office Buildings - 1977 Lansing
Metropolitan Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office Construction Activity by Governmental
Unit 1971 - 1977 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acreage and Floor Space Devoted to Office Uses
Delta Township 1966 - 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Projected Office Land Development and Projected Office
Floor Space Requirements Delta Township
1981 - 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Functional Classification of Highways-Metropolitan
Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Delta Township Road Mileage by Functional
Classification . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Planning Impacts on Roadways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unique Delta Township Features . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CATA Ridership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

V

20
21
26
26

3]
32
40

41
42

45
47

48
49
50

54
57
58
58

59
62

63
63
64
69
70
71
72

84

�TABLES (continued)
Table

W-1
W-2
W-3
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4

SW-1
SW-2
LU-1
LU-2
CF-1
CF-2
CF-3
CF-4
CF-5

Title
Existing Water Wells, Del ta Township ..........•••..•••.•...
Delta Township Water Consumption .•..•..•..•.•..........•...
Recommended Fire Flows ..•..••.......••.......•••...•....•..
Water Resources Commission's Effluent Quality
Standards for the Delta Township WWTP ..•.....•...•.•..•..
Sanitary Sewer Customers 1973-1980 •... • .......•..•....••.•.
Projected Sanitary Sewer Connections and Land
Acreage Consumption 1985-2000 .•..••.••...............•..•
Wastewater Flow Projections at the Delta
Township WWTP 1985-2000 .....•......•.....••..••.......•.•
Estimated Solid Waste Generation
Eaton County, 1980 .••.••.•...•.•.••.••..•.•....•..••••••.
Estimated Soild Waste Generation
Delta Township, 1980-2000 •...•..•.•...•.•.•••...•..•.••..
Future Land Use ••......•••..•...•.....••.........•......•..
Proposed Road Improvements .......•...•.•.•.......•••.•...••
Inventory of Major Delta Township Buildings •..•.•..•.••••..
Delta Patrol Division Activities 1975-1981 .........•...•...
Delta Township Fire Department Responses and
Fire Losses 1975-1981 •.••....•.•.•.•.••..••..•.•...•.....
Enrollment in the Grand Ledge Public School System ...•.....
Enrollment in the Waverly Public School System .•...••.•....

Page

C

93
94
95
104
105
105
106
114
115
119
163
170
170
172
179
180

0

vi

�FIGURES
~
)

Figure

Title

GD-I
GD-II
GD-III
P-I
P-II
P-III
P-IV

Location of Delta Township in the Tri County Region..........
Soil Associations..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Existing Land Use Map........................................
Location of Comparative Geographic Areas.....................
Comparative Population Trends................................
Population Distribution Five Township Area 1960-1980.........
Age-Sex Distribution for Delta Township
1960 - 1970 - 1975............................. . ...........
Five Mile Trade Area Delta Township Central
Business District..........................................
Delta Township Industrial Tract............ . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . .
MDOT Functional Highways Classification......................
Truck Operation Classifications..............................
Road Classifications for Financing Purposes..................
Expressway Cross-Section........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cross-Section of Arterial Road with Boulevard................
Cross-Section of Two Way Arterial Street.....................
Cross-Section of Collector Street............................
Cross-Section of Local Street................................
Road Right-of-way Deficiencies.......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •
Existing Water Service Area (1982)...........................
Existing and proposed Water Service Area (1982)..............
Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Area (1982)..................
Existing and Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service
Area (1982).. .. . ..... ... . . ... •. .. .. . .. . . .. ... . . . .. .. . .. .. . .
Existing Storm Drains (1980).................................
Generalized Future Land Use Plan••···········See binder pouch
Delineated Neighborhood Units....................... . . . . . . . . .
Parks and Green Belts........................................
Proposed Street and Highway Projects.........................
Existing and Proposed Fire Stations..........................
Existing School Facilities...................................

C-I

~

I-I
T-I
T-II
T-III
T-IV
T-V
T-VI
T-VII
T-VIII
T-IX
W-I
W-II
SS-I
ss-II
SD-I
LU-I
LU-II
LU-III
LU-IV
CF-I
CF-II

vii

Page
13
18
23
25
27
28
30
37
53
68
73
75
78
79
80
81
82
83
91
97
99
108
110
125
159
162
175
178

��GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Community goals are general statements with a uniform, community-wide application. Objectives are expressions of specific developmental issues within
the Township. Policies express measures designed to implement the stated
objectives within Delta Township.
The goals, objectives and policies presented in this section are intended
to reflect particular local attitudes and aspirations with respect to the
growth and changes within Delta Township. Delta Township as a community
provides living, working, shopping and recreational spaces for the use and
enjoyment of its residents. The goals and policies provide guidelines
governing the preparation and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan.
With proper design and effectuation, the Plan suggests means of improving
and maintaining the living, working, shopping and recreational spaces for
the betterment of the entire Delta Township community.
Use and application of the stated goals, objectives and policies in planning
and development is essential to ensure success of the planning process in
Delta Township. They should be consulted each time a decision is made regarding private land development, redevelopment and public service capital
expenditures.
I Community Goals
1.

Provide conditions of adequate public health and safety

2.

Provide a choice in housing

3.

Attain a diversified local economic base

4.

Provide a variety of shopping opportunities

5.

Assure a sufficient level of public services and community facilities

6.

Attain a diverse property tax base to assure adequate revenues

7.

Establish development densities to avoid overcrowding and placing
burdens on public services

8.

Establish conditions which promote an aesthetically pleasing environment

9.

Emphasize a neighborhood development pattern

10.

Provide opportunities for energy conservation and the use of alternate
energy sources

11.

Attain a high level of environmental quality while simultaneously fostering utilization of the Township's natural resources

1

�I
II

Residential Development
1.

Objective:

Provide a satisfactory range of housing choices

Policies

2.

A.

A range of housing types should be provided to accommodate
varying needs in household size, location and style preference.

B.

Residential buildings within each neighborhood should be compatible and transitions should be provided where different
types occur in close proximity.

Objective:

Encourage residential development on a neighborhood basis
with the necessary supporting facilities

Policies

3.

A.

Residential development should occur on a neighborhood unit basis
and should be functionally unified through land planning and interior circulation design.

B.

Residential areas should be adequately served by schools, neighborhood shopping facilities, parks and recreation areas, transportation facilities and police and fire services.

Objective:

Strive for maximum livability
development

and amenity in residential

Policies

4.

A.

Residential development should provide adequate light, air,
privacy and quietude.

B.

Residential living areas should be separated from commercial
and industrial areas by functional elements such as open space
or buffered thoroughfares.

C.

High density living areas should be developed to be compatible
with lower density living areas.

Objective:

Preserve the existing housing stock

Policy
Existing housing should be protected from premature environmental decay.
5.

Objective:

Attractiveness and livability of residential development should be increased through open space relationships.

Policies
A.

Open spaces within residential areas should be related to the

2

�overall open space and recreation facilities of the Township.
B.

Park and open space facilities, either public or private in ownership,
should be provided within or in close proximity to medium and high
density residential areas in order to afford residents of multifamily housing a balance of high density living and open space relief.

C.

The design of new residential developments should provide for the
preservation of existing trees, scenic features and provide for
natural settings.

/

6.

Objective:

Medium and high density residential settlements should be
situated near supportive services

Policies

III

A.

The capacity of existing and future public services should be
considered in selecting sites for medium and high density
settlements.

B.

Due to the high cost of providing public supportive services,
higher density settlement areap should be situated to allow the
most cost-effective installation of supportive services.

C.

Multi-family housing should be situated in proximity to comparison
shopping and high capacity transportation facilities.

Commercial Development
1.

Objective:

Distribute connnercial development according to the
specific requirements of comparison and convenience
shopping facilities

Policy
Development of comparison shopping facilities shoul d be situated
to be easily accessible to residential areas.
2.

Objective:

Commercial development should be related to an overall
land use pattern within the Township

Policies

3.

A.

Commercial strip development along thoroughfares in the Township
should be discouraged.

B.

Where strip connnercial development exists, or cannot be avoided due
to the present land use pattern, remedial measures such as minimizing
the number of access points, optimizing curb radii and utilizing
parallel access roads should be examined.

Objective:

Attain satisfactory relationships between connnercial development and other land uses

3
'-&lt;=.

�-

I
Policies

4.

A.

Incompatible land uses should be eliminated from commercial areas.

B.

Commercial areas should be desi r,ned and situated so that they
do not adversely impact nearby uses.

Objective:

Attain aesthetically pleasing commercial development
areas

Policies

5.

A.

Comparison shopping facilities and neif,hborhood convenience
shopping facilities should include pedestrian circulation,
landscaping, adequate setbacks and other amenities which
create an attractive shopping environment.

B.

Sign control regulations should be promoted since they often
result in advertising displays which communicate better and
provide improved aesthetics.

C.

Landscaping within parking lots should be encouraged since it
improves the visual environment and can beneficially affect
the microclimate of parking areas by moderating the affects of
heat, absorbing runoff, diverting wind and reducing noise and
glare.

D.

Screening of solid waste areas should be required because it
improves aesthetics.

Objective:

Facilities in commercial areas should be improved
wherever possible

Policies

IV

A.

Early signs of blight in commercial areas should be reversed
through resolution of traffic ingress and egress problems,
prevention of excessive penetration of local driveways into
arterial thoroughfares, elimination of excessive advertising
signs, and provision for improved site planning design and
landscaping in remaining developable parcels or upon reuse
of existing buildings.

B.

High standards of site design and maintenance should be required in commercial areas.

Industrial Development
1.

Objective:

Provide suitable conditions for the development of new
industry and expansion of existing industry

Policies
A.

Industrial development should be continued in the area generally
bounded by 1-96, Mt. Hope Highway, U.S.-27 and the south Township boundary.

4

�B.

2.

The industrial area should be reinforced through improved
accessibility, utility installation, and supporting service '
facilities.

Objective:

The attainment of an optimum relationship between industrial development and supporting transportation facilities

Policies

3.

A.

Industrial enterprises should provide adequate off-street parking and loading facilities.

B.

Roadways built to all-season standards should be provided
throughout the industrial area.

Objective:

Industrial development should be compatible with other
land uses in the Township

Policies
A.

The creation of industrial parks should be encouraged and
scattered industrial operations should be discouraged.

B.

Industrial areas should be separated from residential areas
by appropriate open space buffers or other transitional
land uses.

C.

Industrial nuisances such as air pollution, noise and vibration should be controlled by adequate zoning and performance
standards.

D.

Incompatible land uses should be prevented from intruding
into industrial areas.

V Community Facilities and Services
1.

Objective:

Attain an optimum aesthetic relationship between public
facilities and the neighborhoods in which they are
situated

Policies

2.

A.

The design of public buildings should be of high quality and
should contribute to the character of the neighborhood they
serve.

B.

Installation of underground utilities should be encouraged in
order to achieve pleasing neighborhoods.

Objective:

Attain an optimal functional relationship between
community facilities and the transportation system

Policies
A.

Elementary schools should be located so that they are within
walking distance of all students in the attendance area.

5

�•

'
3.

B.

Elementary and junior high schools should be located away from
heavily traveled thoroughfares.

C.

Churches, meeting halls, and other places of public assembly
should be located on major arterial streets in order to increase their accessibility to the public and to prevent intrusion of extraneous traffic into residential neighborhoods.

Objective:

The provision of law enforcement services adequate to
maintain the security, safety and well-being of the
Township's residents and property

Policy
Police facilities should be located to allow deployment of
adequate manpower within minimum time to all parts of the
Township.
4.

Objective:

The provision of fire protection services adequate
to meet Township needs

Policies

5.

A.

Fire protection facilities should be located where they can
provide adequate service to all development in the Township.

B.

Buildings which require significant fire flows should be located where they can be served by the public water system.

Objective:

Implement a timely and cost-effective site acquisition
program for public buildings

Policy
Sites for the development of institutional uses should be
acquired well in advance of the development of an area.
6.

Objective:

Provide water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage
facilities adequate to serve development needs

Policy
Development of water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage
facilities should be staged to coincide with anticipated
needs.
VI Transportation Facilities Development
1.

Objective:

Maintain a balanced relationship between land use
traffic generation and the thoroughfare system
capacities

Policies
A.

Thoroughfares should be organized in an interrelated functional system, with the traffic carrying and land use

6

�I

111111
service functions of each thoroughfare segment clearly defined.
Local streets should primarily serve abutting
properties and should be used only by local traffic.
Collector streets should gather and channel traffic
from local streets to the arterial street system.
Arterial streets should carry traffic from collectors
to destinations or to limited access expressways.
B.

2.

Improvement of the thoroughfare system should be coordinated with adjacent communities to ensure both a sound local
and regional transportation system.

Objective:

Separate major thoroughfares from neighborhood units

Policies

3.

A.

Freeways and major arterial streets should be located so as to
bound rather than penetrate residential neighborhoods.
Neighborhood streets should be reserved for local residential traffic.

B.

Development should be separated from arterial streets and expressways by adequate buffer space or building setbacks.

Objective:

Design and build attractive thoroughfares

Policies

4.

A.

Where practical, thoroughfares should be located to take advantage of existing scenic features such as wooded areas, and topographic variations. Where appropriate, landscaping and nonobtrusive noise barriers should be developed along thoroughfare
rights-of-way.

B.

The use of cul-de-sacs, which create areas of privacy, prevent
through traffic and often provide for better utilization of odd
shaped parcels of land, should be encouraged.

C.

Curvilinear streets should be promoted in residential developments since they discourage through traffic and increase visual
interest.

Objective:

Develop an efficient and pleasant pedestrian and bicycle
transportation system.

Policies
A.

Pedestrian and bicycle routes should be provided wherever
possible between residential, recreational and other land
use areas of the Township. Where feasible, pedestrian linkages should be free from interruption of motorized traffic.

B.

Provisions for non-motorized transportation should be incorporated into residential developments and road construction projects wherever possible.

7

I

�-

'

5.

Objective:

Minimize conflict between land uses and transportation
facilities

Policies

6.

A.

Major thoroughfares should have a minimum number of intersections in order to limit land use-transportation friction.

B.

Frontage or service roads should be utilized in commercial,
institutional and industrial zones in order to maintain
the traffic carrying capacity of the roadway and to reduce
the occurence of conflicting turning movements.

C.

Ingress and egress points to major traffic generators should
be designed to include, where appropriate, such items as
sufficient curb radii, deceleration lanes, through passing
lanes and lane tapers in order to insure safe traffic movements.

Objective:

The provision of public transit service to Township
residents

Policy
Improvements to mass-transit services within the Township
should be encouraged.
7.

Objective:

Maintenance of and improvements to the streets and
highways in the Township should be a continuing
process to ensure the safety and convenience of
motorists

Policy
The Township's Capital Improvements Program should include
a road construction and maintenance reserve which could be
utilized as a local match to federal road construction grants
as well as possibly supplementing monies expended by the
Eaton County Road Commission for maintaining Township streets.
VII

Open Space and Recreation Facilities Development
1.

Objective:

Create an interrelated system of open space and recreation facilities to meet the leisure time requirements
of the Township's populatior ·.

Policies
A.

A system of recreational facilities should be developed which
includes major community-wide day use recreation facilities,
major park and athletic facilities for use by residents of the
Township, neighborhood recreation facilities, and special facilities such as community recreation centers, bicycle and hiking
paths and scenic riverside vistas.

8

�2.
I

I

B.

Open space areas which link residential areas with shopping
districts and provide opportunities for non-motorized transportation should be encouraged.

C.

Commercial recreation facilities should be related to the
planning and development of public open space areas where
possible.

Objective:

Open space and recreation areas should be designed to
enhance the character of residential developments

Policies

3.

A.

Open space should be utilized to delineate residential areas
and to give individuality and character to various neighborhood units.

B.

Developers should be encouraged to provide open space and
recreation facilities as part of their overall development
design.

C.

Neighborhood recreation facilities should be developed in
conjunction with school facilities wherever possible.

Objective:

Delta Township should pursue a timely and economical
open space acquisition and development program

Policies

VIII

A.

Sites for recreation facilities should be acquired or reserved well in advance of development.

B.

Implementation of open space and parks development in the
Township should include particjpation of federal, state
and local governments.

Energy
1.

Objective:

Encourage the development of energy efficient forms
of transportation

Policies

2.

A.

Growth patterns which enhance the feasibility of mass
transportation service should be promoted.

B.

The installation of sidewalks and bikepaths, in order to
facilitate the use of non-motorized transportation, should
be encouraged.

Objective:

Implement local regualtions which permit innovative
methods of energy utilization and generation

9

�-

'

Policies

3.

A.

Alternative energy generating technologies such as wind, biomass
and solar should be encouraged.

B.

Township regulations should be drafted which insure a property
owner's right to sunlight.

C.

Energy generating facilities should be compatible in terms of
safety and aesthetics with adjacent land uses.

Objective:

Investigate and encourage new techniques relating to
energy use and conservation

Policies

IX

A.

Public and private decision-makers should analyze the possibility
of utilizing steam produced by the Erickson Power Plant as a resource for industrial operations within the area.

B.

Delta Township governmental services should emphasize energy
conservation through its capital improvements spending.

C.

Construction design practices which will encourage ener gy conservation should be promoted.

D.

Buildings should be oriented to take advantage of energy conservation practices.

The Environment
1.

Objective:

Insure that development activities respect the features
of the natural environment

Policies
A.

Township planning efforts should recognize the value of retaining
vegetation since it helps control runoff, stabilizes slopes,
attracts wildlife, buffers noise and provides privacy.

B.

Flood-prone areas should be preserved in their natural state to
minimize environmental damage, reduce the unnecessary private
and public costs which result from inappropriate development in
these areas, assure the safety of residents, and guarantee the
free flow of water.

C.

Marshes and wetlands within Delta Township should be preserved
since they serve as ground-water discharge areas, provide wildlife habitats, provide natural filtration of contaminates within stormwater and are a component of the natural drainage system.

D.

Urban development should be limited to soil types which allow
for properly functioning septic systems if sanitary sewer service
is non-existant.

10

�E.

2.

The development of steep slopes should be avoided since the
development of such areas can result in erosion or septic
tank problems.

Objective:

Preserve prime agricultural lands for farming activities

Policies

3.

A.

Isolated residential development in agricultural areas should
be discouraged so as to ensure the economic viability of agricultural enterprises.

B.

Highly productive soils such as those found in southwestern
Delta Township should be reserved for the production of
specialty crops.

C.

Agricultural lands adjacent to watercourses should be managed
such that agricultural wastes and soil sediments do not adversely affect water quality via run-off.

Objective:

Measures should be taken to minimize the negative impacts of urban development on the natural environment

Policies
A.

Areas from which mineral deposits have been extracted should
be reclaimed and proper safety measures undertaken.

B.

Delta Township should participate in regional efforts to investigate the possibility of establishing a solid waste
management program.

C.

Soils which are highly susceptible to erosion should be protected by corrective measures if development is proposed.

D.

Natural drainage patterns should not be disrupted absent
remedial action due to the fact that erosion, siltation
and structural damage may result.

E.

Properly designed and engineered storm drainage controls
should accompany the installation of significant amounts
of impervious surfaces.

F.

The abatement of pollution of Delta Township watercourses
should be given a high priority.

G.

Groundwater quality and supply problems should be identified and
a groundwater management strategy should be developed.

H.

A comprehensive flood plain management program should be a required element of the Township's planning efforts.

11

�l

�,
GEOGRAPHIC DETERMINANTS
I

,

Location of Delta Township
The location of a community is an influential factor and indicator of what
changes are likely to take place within the community. Location of a community in relation to major transportation facilities and employment centers
will bear directly on the likelihood of growth within the community.

I

I'

Situated within the Lansing Tri-County Region, Delta Township has experienced rapid growth since 1960. This growth can be attributed to the Township Is close proximity to major employment centers, such as the State
Government and the Oldsmobile Industrial Complex, as well as Delta's
strategic location in relation to the interstate highway network. Major
routes providing direct service to the Township are I-96, I-496 and US 27.
Interstate Highway 69, eventually connecting Port Huron, Michigan and
Indianapolis, Indiana is slated for completion through Eaton County into
Delta intersecting at the I-96/I-496 Interchange. Existing and proposed
freeways have given impetus to expansion of commerce within Delta's industrial sector, especially with respect to najcr freight carriers and the
warehousing distribution service industry.
The Grand Trunk Western Railroad (GTWRR) traverses the southeastern quadrant of the Township, paralleling US-27. The GTWRR operates a major rail
switching yard in Section 25, further complementing rail services to the
Township.
Capital City Regional Airport is located one-half mile northeast of Delta
Township. Waverly Road and Grand River Avenue provide primary access to
the airport from the Township. Capital City Airport provides scheduled
commercial air passenger and air freight services as well as charter
flights for both passengers and air freighc.
Regionally, the Lansing area and Delta Township have economic links throughout the East North Central portion of the United States. This highly industrialized region is directly dependent upon the highway and rail systems
for distribution of finished and semi-finished products to markets. This
fact further contributes to the economic viability of the Lansing area
due to its favorable location with respect to major highway and rail facilities. Delta Township, as evidenced by Figure GD I, enjoys a preferred
position within the Lansing Metropolitan Area with respect to access to highway and rail facilities.
II

Historical Growth of Delta Township
The history of Delta Township can be traced along three lines of development. The first is the founding, growth and withering of Grand River City,
also known as Delta Mills. This line of development began in the 1830's
reached its peak in the 1880's and 1890's and subsequently terminated.
The second line of historical development in Delta Township can also be
traced from the 1830 1 s with the founding of scattered farmsteads distributed throughout the Township but primarily on section lines. This line
of development continues today as a significant proportion of Township
land which is actively used for agricultural purposes. Delta Township's
third line of historical development connnenced in the .1930 's when the
eastern portion of the Township began to be developed as a suburb of
Lansing. This line of development was dependent on the growth of the
Lansing Region and did not greatly accelerate until after 1945.
12

I,
I

�•
FIGURE GD-I
LOCATION OF DELTA TOWNSHIP IN THE
TRI-COUNTY REGION

IN

Settlement of the Tri-County Region along with most of the rest of lower
Michigan was postponed by the erroneous Tiffin report of 1815 which diverted
settlers to Indiana, Ohio and Illinois. Subsequent survey and exploration
work conducted under the direction of Governor Cass corrected the record and
by the 1330's south central Michigan and the Tri-County Region were attracting settlers interested in both lumbering and farming.
The first settler of the Delta Mills area was Erastus Ingersoll who purchased
800 acres on the Grand River. Ingersoll and others had come to the Delta
Mills area in search of a site for an educational institution to be modeled
after Oberlin College. However, their plans for the Grand River Theological
Seminary were dashed by the financial crisis of 1837-38. In the meantine,
Ingersoll built a sawmill and began lumbering operations. An 1840 letter
authored by a resident of Delta Mills indicated that people came from
twenty miles away to have their flour made. Delta Mills continued to develop
throughout the latter half of the 19th century at ~vhich time it reached its
peak population of approximately 300. During the 1880's and 1890's Delta
Mills was served by Methodist and Congr egational churches, three blacksmiths,
three grocers, two masons, one cabinetmaker, one carpenter, one painter
and one paperhanger and two physicians. Manufacturing activities included
were fabrication, cigar wrapping and furniture building. Social life at this
time centered around the churches and the Grange Hall which attracted both
local residents and farmers from the surrounding countryside.
Farming activities throughout Delta Township must have commenced about the
same time that Erastus Ingersoll was founding Grand River City and building
his lumber mill. However, it was not until 1844 that the State Legislature
acted to officially establish Delta Township whose territories were broken
off from the eastern portion of Oneida Township. Tax rolls in 1844 indicate
twenty-six residing in the Township.
13

-

�-,

I
I

I

At about the same time that Erastus Ingersoll was planning the Grand River
Theological Seminary and other settlers were clearing portions of Delta
Township for farmsteads, decisions were being made in other parts of the
State which would one day have a direct bearing on Township development.
By the terms of the 1834 Constitution, it was required that the capital of
Michigan be removed from Detroit within a period of twelve years. The
prosperous communities of Jackson and Marshall, located on the territorial
road between Chicago and Detroit, were given primary consideration as sites
for the new capital. However, due to the stubborn nature of partisans of
each city, an alternative location was selected. The Village of Michigan,
later to become known as Lansing, was proposed by a legislator who owned a
sawmill nearby.
Growth of Lansing during the second half of the 18th century was primarily
due to the establishment of the capital there. However, the City also became the site of growing economic activity. By 1869 there was at least
one manufacturing concern serving the outside market.
This firm produced agricultural implements, bobsleds and stoves which were distributed
over a wide portion of the midwest.
Another firm made machinery for the
lumbering industry operating further to the north. In 1886, R.E. Olds built
his first horseless carriage in Lansing. His subsequent decision to establish automobile manufacturing operations in Lansing was the most important
single factor in the history of the Lansing Metropolitan Area.
It was during the last quarter of the 19th century when Lansing was becoming a complete urban entity with governmental, manufacturing and educational
activities that surrounding cities and villages such as Delta Mills were
reaching their fullest development as service centers for the local farm
population. However, during this time population increases produced in the
farm lands were attracted to Lansing rather than to the small service
centers.
During the 1930's the wide-spread use of the automobile and the development of
paved streets led to the suburbanization of Lansing's growing population.
This process was much accelerated after 1945 when the industrial power
which had been mobilized for Worlcl War II was diverted to production of consumer goods, particularly the automobile.
III Climate
Delta Township lies within the central plains climatic region. The regional
climate is moderated by the influence of the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes
act as a moderator of what otherwise would be locally hotter summers and
colder winters.
Characteristics of Delta's climate and adjacent inland areas are best described as follows:
.Temperature averages 26.3 degrees in winter, 69.5 degrees in
summer, with an annual average of 48 degrees .
. The frost-free growing season typically runs from early May to
mid October and averages 154 days .
. Precipitation approximates 33 inches annually, and is fairly
well distributed throughout the year. The average number of
days receiving measurable rainfall is 160 or about 45% of
the year .
. Snowfall varies considerably each year, but the normal snowfall approximates 26-28 inches.
14

�•
.Prevailing winds are out of the southwest during warm
weather months, and west-southwest during winter,
averaging6-10m.p.h. during a typical 24 hour period .
. Tornadoes pose a nominal threat during warm weather
months, but destructive thunder storms and severe
winds are a more common occurrence.
An area's climate is not typically deemed a controlling environmental factor
with respect to the development of a community. However, temperature, winds,
and precipitation have several meaningful effects upon urban culture and manmade development .
. Amount and frequency of rainfall does affect ground
water recharge and thereby affects water supply .
. Rainfall amounts and intensity affect storm drain
design capacity and slope design of impervious areas .
. Rainfall distributed throughout the growing season
is conducive to a variety of agricultural activities .
. Snowfall amounts as received in Delta suggest that
roadsides and parking lots be designed to store snow
during weather .
. Plant and landscape materials, sensitive to extremes
in temperature and precipitation, must be carefully
selected .
. Wind levels may require specific development regulations
as to wind loading and vegetation or structural screens
in shopping and living areas to reduce ground level wind
speeds .
. Level of sunlight has numerous implications: such as
alternative energy, heat concentrations from extensively
paved areas, recreation opportunities, need for shade
and orientation of building to the sun.
When preparing short term plan elements and specific development regula·tions climatic influences must be given consideration.
IV

Geology and Topography
Two primary geological formations underlie Delta Township. The first 100
feet below the surface consists of debris laid down and contoured by advances
and recessions of the glaciers. Below this glacial debris is several hundred feet of sedimentary rock precipitated from the lakes which covered
Michigan during the Paleozoic Era. This sedimentary rock alternates in
layers between limestone, sandstone and shale.
The glacial action which was responsible for deposits of debris over the
many layers of sedimentary rock also created the surface topography of Delta
Township and the rest of the Tri-County Region. This topography is primarily
level with slopes ranging from zero to five degrees except along major watercourses where slopes may be steeper. Elevations in Delta Township vary from
a high of 890 feet above sea level in the vicinity of Creyts Road and U.S. 27
to a low of 800 feet where the northern course of the Grand River leaves the
western edge of the Township. These elevations reflect Delta Township's
location near the center of the Tri-County Region which slopes gradually
from a high elevation of 1,052 feet in southern Ingham County to a low elevation of 640 feet in western Clinton County.
Within the context of this gradual slope from the southeast to the northwest,
Delta Township topography is characterized by a major drainage divide. The
15

�,
northern and eastern portions of the Township lie within the Grand River
drainage basin while the southwestern portion of the Township lies within
the Thornapple River basin. Most of the portion of the Township lying within the Grand River basin drains to the northern course of the Grand River;
however, much of the southeastern portion of the Township drains to the
lower course of the Grand River. Drainage in the southwestern portion of
the Township is toward the southwest.
The relatively level topography within the Township does present several important implications to further urbanization. These influences are generally described as follows:
Sewerage and storm drainage systems, dependent upon gravity flow for optimum
operation, must be carefully located, sized and graded at initial installation to avoid operating problems and service area limitations.
Level land can result in monotonous development unless artifically induced
contours and/or vegetation zones are introduced into the urban environment.
Development of the steeply sloping lands adjacent to the Grand River and
Carrier Creek, should be judiciously regulated or precluded by planning
policy and development controls. The steep slopes (woodlots usually exist
concurrently) pose potential for hillside erosion and stream damage, yet at
the same time offer scenic areas and passive open spaces for the benefit of
nearby homesites.
V

Soil Conditions in Delta Township
Three factors must be considered in evaluating soil conditions in Delta
Township. These factors are fertility, stability and permeability. Most of
the diverse soil types found in Delta Township are in the medium to high
fertility range. This fertility, as well as a moderate climate and rainfall
make large portions of Delta Township highly attractive for agricultural
purposes. Soil stability factors are important considerations in determining the feasibility of large commercial and industrial developments which
can be constructed on unstable soils only at great costs. Construction of
large facilities has occurred on soils of poor stability characteristics,
however, such development is costly and should be avoided where possible.
The permeability of drainage capacity of soils is related to both their
fertility and stability. The low percolation rates attributable to the mixture of clay, silt and sand common to much of Delta Township soils are desirable for agricultural activities because they allow water to move through
them at rates beneficial to plant growth.
However, the clay content of these soils makes them unacceptable for the
discontinous type of suburban development which must be served by septic
tanks and drain fields instead of sanitary sewers.
The diverse pattern of soil types found in Delta Township makes it difficult
to draw generalized conclusions about which portions of the Township are
acceptable for different kinds of development. Specific tests are necessitated for each development proposal to determine whether or not soil conditions permit utilization of septic tanks and drain fields on a permanent
basis, or not at all. Similarly, detailed soil analyses would be needed to
determine the load-bearing characteristics of particular development areas
due to the diversity of soil types in Delta Township.

16

�•
Despite the wide variety of soil conditions scattered throughout the Township, it is possible to draw some broad generalizatons pertaining to the
type of development and services which must be provided to portions of the
Township. Soils which are extremely poorly drained and which have high concentrations of peat, muck and alluvial soil can be found scattered throughout the Township. Such poorly drained soils cannot accommodate septic
tanks and drain fields and present load-bearing problems which make development difficult. The greatest concentrations of such poorly drained soils
occur in the southwest quadrant of the Township west of Broadbent Road and
south of Mt. Hope Highway. These organic soils are utilized for the growing
of sod and cash crops such as mint and vegetables. Other major locations
where peat, muck and alluvial soils are located include the banks of the
Miller Creek. Concentrations of somewhat poorly drained soils occur throughout the Township, but particularly in proximity to the peat, muck and alluvial soil of the southwest quadrant. Other concentrations of poorly drained
soils occur along the Miller Creek watercourse, and at various locations between the Carrier Creek and Elmwood and Snow Roads.
For the most part, soil conditions in the Township are of sufficiently low
permeability to indicate that septic tanks and drain fields will be inadequate for use on a long term basis. As a matter of local policy and regulation, development of vacant land should be discouraged where public sanitary sewer service is not provided concurrent with such development. Figure
GD-II illustrates general soil associations in Delta Township as determined
by the Eaton County Soil Conservation Service.
VI

Ground Water
Fresh water used by Delta Township residents and persons living throughout
the Tri-County Region comes from water bearing layers of sandstone rock
known as aquifers. In portions of the Region, including Delta Township,
water is also pumped from gravel and sand lying above bedrock. The primary
ground water source for the Region is known as the Saginaw sandstone formation which can be tapped by wells averaging 300 to 400 feet in depth.
Ground water levels vary according to seasonal climatic conditions and the
rate of pumping. When water in an area is pumped faster than it can be
naturally supplied, the residential or municipal wells surrounding the area
become temporarily dry. Tri-County Region ground water is notable for its
hardness; it includes 300 ppm hardness and 0.5 ppm iron.
Glacial deposits in the Township vary considerably in their water yielding
characteristics. Again, detailed study of specific locations and their
characteristics are prerequisite to determining the true availability of
ground water. Outwash deposits are potential sources of large water supplies because they usually consist of permeable sands and gravels. An exposed outwash has been identified by the Michigan Department of Transportation lying in Section 19 of Delta Township.

VII Surface Water
The principal natural feature in Delta Township is the Grand River which
enters near Dimondale, just south of the Township, and then traverses the
southeast corner of the Township and then re-enters the Township at Waverly
Road and crosses the entire width of the Township. A greater length of the
Grand River is in Delta Township than in any governmental unit in the Region.
Minor watercourses which flow into the northern course of the Grand River include the Carrier Creek and Miller Creek and numerous other natural drains
of lesser size. Minor watercourses feeding into the southern course of the
Grand River include the Clement's Drain and other drains. Natural drainage

17

�,)

)

1)

DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure GD·II
SOIL ASSOCIATIONS

D

Marlette· Capac:

t.8

Houghton-Gilford-Adrian:

Nearly level
to gently undulating, well drained
to somewhat poorly drained, loamy
soils on till plains.

Nearly level, very poorly drained,
mucky and loamy soils in glacial
drainageways.

&gt;zj

I-'·
00

C

t'i

(I)

D

@

Marlette-Capac-Owosso:
Nearly level to hilly, well drained
to somewhat poorly drained, loamy
soils on moraines and till plains.

I

H
H
,tj

D

Pl

00

ro

,_.

,,,,"

00

,,..,, ........,...,,..,,,---/

L

________ .,,, ,,- ----

/
/

/

/

I

--

/

/

.,,. /

/

/

/

,,

,,

/

,, ,,

/

/

/

Capac- Parkhill:

Nearly level to
gently undulating, somewhat
poorly drained, loamy soils and
nearly level, poorly drained and
very poorly drained, loamy soils;
on till plains and low moraines.

--··---- 100 Year Flood Plain

/

NORTH

Ill

�in the southwest portion of the Township is southwesterly toward the Thornapple River.
Delta Town ship's watercourses, particularly the Grand River and the Carrier
Creek present an excellent potential for the development of recreational
facilities and high value residential areas. To realize this potential,
the problems of flooding and water pollution must be addressed. Water pollution is primarily a regional problem, the resolution of which Delta Township can promote by taking a lead in implementing high standards of wastewater treatment. Flooding is also a regional problem which Delta Township
can best help solve by prohibiting development within the natural flood
plains. Figure GD-II illustrates the general location of the one hundred
year flood plain within Delta Township.
VIII Existing Land Use Pattern
Delta Township may be characterized as a community experiencing a major
change in personality. The emerging land use pattern suggests the community
is developing an independent economic base, major comparison shopping facilities, and a wide variety of housing types. No longer a sparsely developed,
suburban bedroom community, the 1980 lµnd use survey reveals that vacant
land in Delta Township is being converted to urban uses at the rate of over
one hundred acres per year. During the 1972-1980 period twenty one new
subdivisions were platted, four apartment projects were constructed, and
three condominium developments were constructed. Major commercial and office
uses developed during the 1972-1980 period including the Waverly Plaza, additions to the Lansing Mall, Auto Owners Insurance Company headquarters and the
Hilton Inn. Major new industrial-warehouse uses include Oldsmobile Plant
Number Five, the Meijer Distribution Center, General Motors Parts Warehouse
addition, Central Transport, Blue Arrow Trucking, Interstate and Associated
Motor Freight Companies, Lansing Storage Company, Flint Pipe and Well Supply Company , Clark Foundation, the Detroit News, Shreve Steel and Coco.Cola.
Table GD-1 presents a breakdown by acres of the existing 1980 land use composition of Delta Township. Figure GD-III presents the spatial distribution of
the existing land use pattern. A comparison of Figure GD-III with its 1972
counterpart on page 23 of the 1973 Comprehensive Plan provides the reader
with insight regarding the extent of land development in the Township in the
1972-1980 period.
IX Delta Township Land Use Trends:

1972-1980

Delta Township's land use p~ttern can be characterized as being in a dramatic
state of change. Since the 1972 land use survey was conducted as background
for the 1973 Comprehensive Plan, approximately 1,000 acres of land has been
converted from an agricultural or vacant classification to urban uses.
Table GD-2 illustrates the change in the 1972-1980 period which has taken
place as to the land use pattern. As of November 1, 1980, Delta Township
had 3203 acres of land devoted to single-family detached residential uses
(low density), 234 acres to multiple family residential uses, 413 acres to
public-semi public uses including schools, churches and colleges, 325 acres
to commercial uses, 606 acres to parks and open-space uses, 739 acres to
warehousing-industrial uses and 2380 acres to transportation facilities and
utilities.
19

�1

I
TABLE GD-1
EXISTING LAND USE

1980
Acreage

Percent
of Total

Residential
Single Family
Two Family
Multiple Family

3203
30
234

Office
Commercial - Retail
Commercial - Services
Warehousing
Industrial
Utilities and Transportation

14.2
.1

1.0

87
198
127
495
244
2380

.4
.9
.6
2.2
1.1
10.5

413
606

1.8
2.7

7881
6387
335

34.8
28 . 2
1.5

22,620

100.0

Community Facilities
Schools
Parks and Open Spa ce

Agriculture
Vacant
Water Area
TOTAL

20

�•
TABLE GD-2
1972-1980 LAND USE CHANGE:
DELTA TOWNSHIP
1980
Acreage

1972
Acreage

Percent
Change

Residential
Single Family
Two Family
Multiple Family

Office
Commercial - Retail
Commercial - Services
Warehousing
Industrial
Utilities and
Transportation

3203
30
234

2,878.oO)

*83.0

87
198
127
495
244

*

171. 0
40.0
*
*

2380

*

+

11%

*
+ 182%

*

+ 16%
+ 218%
*
*

*

Community Facilities
Schools
Parks and Open Space

Agriculture
Vacant
Water Area

413
606

214.0
461.0

*

*
*

TOTAL

22,723

7881
6387
335

*
*
*

22,620

*

*Information not available.
(1) Actual 1972 adjusted acreage was 2,878 based on
calculations developed by the Delta Township
Planning Department

21

+ 93%
+ 31%

�1

[,

'\

Nearly all of the new land development in Delta Township during this period
occured east of I-96, and, excepting industrial and warehouse uses, north
of I-496. This is explained due to the provision of sanitary s ewer , public
water, and urban storm drainage utilities in this area. Since the 1972
land use survey a most obvious trend has been the infill of the so-called
northeast quadrant of the Township, being south of I-496 and east of I-96.
This growth in the southeast quadrant has been based upon favorable location in relation to transportation facilities and an aggressive posture
on the part of Township Officials in providing utilities to and encouraging development of the area, known as the "Delta Industrial Tract."
Another very evident trend has been the substantial number of large lot
single-family homes built in the non-urbanized portions of Delta Township.
Occuring primarily west of I-9 6 , most of these homes have been constructed
on non-platted parcels of land.
Over one-quarter of the Township's total land area lay vacant as of 1980.
The majority of the vacant land within the Township is located west of
1-96. Vacant land appears in a number of forms including floodplains
and wetlands, forested areas, large acreage parcels occupied by a single
dwelling, fallow farm land, public lands and areas composed of poor soils.
Vacant land is recognized as an important commodity since it represents
one of the Township's most valuable natural resources and presents many
opportunities for the future.
The existing land use map, Figure GD-III, differentiates between lands in
agricultural production and vacant lands. The amount of land used for
farming activities in the Township has decreased as development of the
Township's industrial tract has intensified, residential subdivisions have
been platted and the construction of single family homes on large parcels
has increa sed. During the period of 1969 to 1978 the amount of land in
agricultural production in Eaton County decreased by eight percent.
(Data source: "Michigan Farm Lands are Increasing Again", Detroit News,
April 12, 1981). During the late 1970's several hundred acres of farm
land in the Township were enrolled in farmland development rights agreements under the provisions of Act 116 of 1974 being the Farmland and Open
Space Preservation Act.
Delta Township has attempted to preserve prime farm lands by a number of
actions including active participation in the aforementioned farmland
preservation program, creation of agricultural zoning districts and efforts
to channel new development to areas already served by public utilities and
services. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes agricultural activities as
a long-term, permanent land use rather than a "holding area" for future
development.

22

��I
-~-----.....

TOWNSHIP

DELTA

Figure GD·III
EXISTING LAND USE
Single Family Residential

k

Single Family Subdivision
Two Family Residential

__,

~ Multi-Family Residential

ii

Office

•

Commercial Retail

D

Commercial Service

~ Warehousing

[ ] Industrial-Manufacturing

II
II

Transportation-Utilities
Public-Semi-Public
Parks and Open Space
Agriculture

D

CITY OF
LANSING

.1L--------------

............. .......

Vacant and

-

NORTH

Figure GD-III Page 23

Non-Urban

�1

~I

POPULATION ANALYSIS AND PROJECTIONS
An analysis of population characteristic.s

I

ai.1d trends cannot be undertaken
exclusively for a limited geographic area such as the 35 square mile area
of Delta Township. In order to make reasonable estimates of population
within the Township, it is necessary to consider population characteristics
and migration patterns in and around the entire Lansing Metropolitan Area.
The Tri-County Regional Planning Commission (TCRPC) projections, together
with population characteristics data from the 1970, 1975, and 1980 census
reports have been relied upon extensively in the following discussion of
Township population trends and characteristics.

I

The population analysis and projection chapter consists of two parts. In
Part I, the past trend of population growth in Delta Township is described;
comparisons are also drawn between Delta Township's past growth and that of
similar and surrounding areas. Part II deals with Delta Township's future
population; general implications of future population change and characteristics are also discussed.
I

Population Growth in Delta Township
Past population trends experienced by Delta Township have been compared to
the population trends of the State of Michigan, the Tri-County Region, the
Five-Township Area, Eaton County and Meridian Township. These areas are
grap_h ically depicted in Figure P- I.
Figure F-II illustrates the nature of Delta Township's growth over the past
fifty years. Each decade has experienced substantial additions to the Tcwnship's total population. In numerical terms, Delta Township's population
has risen from under 2,000 in 1930 to 23,800 in 1980. This represents a
growth rate for the fifty-year period of more than 1100 percent. Thus,
Delta Township had the largest growth rate in the period of any of the
six areas which were analyzed. The region's second largest growth area,
Meridian Township, experienced a rate greater than 900 percent for the
period.
During the 1960's Delta Township experienced its highest rate of growth,
being a 129 percent increase, for any decade within the 1930-1980 period.
The population increase for the Township in the 1970-1980 period indicates a
clecr c,ase in the rate of growth when compared to the previous decade. During
the 1960-1970 period, Delta Township's annual population increase averaged
approximately 970 persons. The 1970-1980 period resulted in the Township's
population increasing by approximately 600 persons annually.
Comparison of Delta
Township Population Trends
With Other Areas
Tables P-1 and P-2 provide comparisons of change in Delta Township population
to other selected areas. Table P-1 presents resident population for the
period 1930-1980. Table P-2 shows the numerical increases for each census
year during the same period as well as the corresponding percentage of population increase for each period. The rapid pace of population growth in
Delta Township is evident when compared to the other areas. Figure P-II
graphically depicts the information contained in the aforementioned tables.

24

�•

I
FIGURE P-I
LOCATION OF COMPARATIVE GEOGRAPHIC AREAS

STATE

OF MICHIGAN

FIVE-TOWNSHIP

,""T"-t--+~+ii-41+ffld-""T"-, AREA

TRI-COUNTY

REGION

DEWITT

DELTA

DELHI

,,
FIVE-TOWNSHIP AREA

-

25

�1

I

I
TABLE P-1
COMPARATIVE POPULATION TRENDS
1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980*

Delta Township

1,921

2,618

4,131

7, 627

17,396

23,822

Meridian Township

2,878

4,767

9,!08

13,884

23,827

28,754

103,160

116,184

158,293

198,142

245,842

271,661

31,728

34,124

40,023

49,684

68,892

88 ,JJ 7

Tri-County Region

172,489

191,411

244,159

298,949

378,423

419,750

State of Michigan

4,842,000

5,256,000

6,373,000

7,823,000

8,890,000

9,262,078

Five-Township Area 1
Eaton County

1

rncludes Delta, Delhi, DeWitt, Lansing and Meridian Townships; Lansing and East Lansing.

Source:

Table by Delta Township Planning Department based on data from the U.S.
Censuses of Population and Housing, 1940-1970; from the Tri-County
Regional Planning Commission; and from the Department of Management and
Budget, State of Michigan.

*1980 Figures represent Final 1980 Census Counts, February, 1982

TABLE P-2
INCREMENTAL POPULATION INCREASES
1930-1940
Delta Township
Meridian Township
Five-Township Area
Eaton County
Tri-County Region
State of Michigan
Source:

1940-1950

1950-1960

1960-1970

1970-1980&gt;'&lt;

697 (36%)

1,513 (5 3% )

3,496(85%)

9,769(129 %)

6,426(37 %)

1,889(66%)

4,341(91 %)

4,776 (52 ;~ )

9,943 ( 71 %)

4, 923 ( 21%)

13,024 (13%)

42,109(25 %)

39,849(25 %)

47,700( 21%)

25,819(U%)

2,376( 9%)

5,899 (18 %)

9,661(24 %)

19,208( 39%)

19, 4L+5 (28 %)

18,922 (11 %)

52,748(28 %)

54,790(2 2% )

79,474( 27%)

41,327(11%)

414,000( 8%) 1,116,000(21 %) 1,451,000 (23 ~~ ) 1,052,000(
13%)

372,078( 4%)

Delta Township Planning Department based on data in Table P-1

*1980 Figures represent Final 1980 Census Counts, February, 1982.

26

�•
FIGURE P-II
COMPARATIVE POPULATION TRENDS
130

120

110

I
I
I

100

I
I
I
I
I

90

I
I
w
fl)

80

ct

w
0:::

u

z

I-

z

w

70

60

u

0:::

w
11.

50

40

\

\

""\
"

.. ···

.· ·.

·· ..

_

""

30

.···

DELTA

TWP.

···....
EATON CO.
MERIDIAN TWP.

20

10

················

~,, TRI-COUNTY REGION
FIVE-TWP. REGION

0
19201930

1930-

1940-

1950-

1960-

1970-

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

Tl ME

-.

27

19801990

�1

I
FIGURE P-III
Population Distribution
Five Township Area

•

1960-1980

!DELTA

TWP.

-MERIDIAN

TWP.

-EAST LANSING

LANSING/
LANSING
TWP.

-DELHI

TWP.
TWP.
;DELTA

TWP.

1960

TWP.

-EAST

LANSING

TWP.
TWP.

;DELTA TWP.

1970

EAST
-LANSING

-DELHI
\DEWITT

TWP.

TWP.

1980
28

�I

-

•
Distribution of Population
in the Five-Township Area
The Five-Township area encompasses a large portion of the Lansing Metropolitan area. Figure P-III portrays changing distribution of population in the
area during the 1960-1980 period. Those portions of the metropolitan area
with increasing shares of population are vividly presented. The Townships
of Delhi, Dewitt, Meridian and Delta currently represent thirty percent of
the metropolitan area population as compared to fifteen percent in 1940.
This redistribution of metropolitan area population appears to be continuing. A possible explanation for this changing pattern of population distribution is a general tendency for the growth of a given area to slow after
a certain density has been reached.
During the 1960-1970 period, the population in the suburban townships surrounding Lansing, being Delhi, Dewitt, Delta and Meridian, increased by
46 percent while the increase in the 1970-1980 period was 23 percent. The
slow down in the urbanization of the suburbs can be attributed to many
factors including increasing energy costs, a decreasing supply of land
which has the necessary public utilities, and the increasing cost of development which is characterized by high land costs, high mortgage rates,
and high materials costs.
The Impact of Inrnigration on
Delta Township's Population Growth
Inmigration has played a significant role in Delta Township's phenomenal
population growth. Usually, the net migration experienced by an area over
a period of time is determined by finding the difference between the actual
change in population during the time period and the natural increase or
decrease of the population over the same time period. Natural increase or
decrease is determined by the difference between the recorded births and the
recorded deaths attributed to the region for the time period in question.
Until recently, however, birth and death records have not been kept for
areas smaller than a county. During the period of 1960-1970, sixty-five
percent of the population growth in Eaton County was attributed to inmigration. Inmigration also had a significant impact in the 1970-1980 period
when sixty-four percent of the population growth in Eaton County resulted
from inmigration. Certainly, Delta Township has experienced a large
amount of inmigration over the past decade. Due to the fact that Delta
Township's population grew at a greater rate (35%) than Eaton County's
population (25%) during the 1970's, it is likely that Delta Township
experienced a higher inmigration rate than did Eaton County.
Age-Sex Structure of
Delta Township's Population
An age-sex pyramid for Delta Township is illustrated in Figure P-IV.

It
indicates the number of males and females in various age groups thus resulting in its pyramidal shape. Such a graphic presentation of population
structure is useful because it indicates at a glance any abnormalities
present in a population. The concept of a perfect pyramid may be used as
a guide against which to measure the pyramid actually generated by the
population in question. The assumptions upon which the perfect pyramidal
shape depend can be summarized as follows: Age-specific mortality rates
will remain constant and will be, for any age group, equal to or greater

29

�1

'

than those of any younger group. This helps ensure that each age group
will be broader at the base and more gradually sloped. Finally, the
perfect pyramidal shape of any age-sex distribution depends on both birth
and mortality rates being the same for both males and females. If they
are not, the pyramid will be lopsided. It is unlikely that the foregoing
assumptions would hold entirely for any real population as birth rates vary
from year to year as do death rates.

FIGURE P-IV
Age-Sex Distribution
For Delta Township
1960-1970-1975

'T!IYoan

IINIOII CIT1ZINI

7

,.INI
LAIOII ,ollCI

ITUDINTI'

Plll•ICHOOL

!I· 14

u11~•• s
Year•
2400 ZIOO 1D00 1100 IIOO 1400 1100 1000 100

600 400

Females

ZOO

0

200

400 100 100

1000 1200 1400 1800 1100 1000 UOCU400

Males

"-••··-•

1975 P,OPULATION

•----- 1970 POPULATION
- - - 1960 POPULATION

In Figure P-IV each age group, except the first, represents a span of ten
yea~s. This limitation results in a deviation in the shape of the pyramid.
The youngest age group, being a shorter time span, appears abnormally thin.
In spite of this limitation, Figure P-IV contains useful data. The comparison it draws between Delta Township's 1960 and 1975 populations is indicative of the 173 percent growth rate that the Township experienced over the
15 year period. Population increases have been significant in every age-

30

�-

I
sex group, excepting only males 75 or more years old. The pyramid indicates abnormalities which appear in the general shape of Delta Township's
1960, 1970 and 1975 age-sex composition. Significant indentations can be
seen for two 1960 age groups -- the 15 to 24 age group and the 25 to 34
age group. These indentations can be explained in terms of the aforementioned expected indentation of age groups born during the Depression.
For males, the indentation of the younger group was carried forward to
1970 and all but disappeared in 1975.
The indentation of the older group seems to have disappeared by 1970.
This obviously represents a greater inmigration of males 25 to 34 years
old in 1960. For females, the indentation of the older group has also
been eliminated by the effects of inmigration. Further, the indentation
of the younger group has itself almost disappeared as of 1975. Of significance is the size of the five to 14 age group in 1970. Although this group
cannot logically be compared to the next younger group, it can be compared
with the next older one. Again, in its extremely large size, the effects
of inmigration can be seen. The 1975 census data indicates the effect of
inmigration as to the five-14 age group has lessened significantly representing not only an absolute decline of population in this age group, but
suggesting a decline of new families with school age children.
Population Per
Household
An important social characteristic of population is the continuing decrease

in the population per household in Delta Township. Table P-3 illustrates
past trends in the population per household in Delta Township over a twentyyear period.
TABLE P-3
POPULATION PER HOUSEHOLD
DELTA TOWNSHIP
1960-1980
Year

Population Per Household

1960

3. 74

1970

3.75

1975

3.22

1980

2. 83

Source:

U.S. Bureau of Census

The continued decrease in the population per household can be attributed
to many factors including a declining birth rate and corresponding maturation of the population as a whole. Social factors contributing to this
decline include a greater mobility of the under 24 age group accompanied
by higher economic independence, a declining marriage rate, and a trend
toward childless cohabitation.

-

31

1

�1

I
I

The U.S. Census Bureau has reported a 66 percent increase in nonfamily
households during the 1970's. Nationally, nonfamily households in 1980
accounted for one-fourth of all units, compared to one-fifth in 1970.
The Census also revealed that almost 90 percent of nonfamily households
consist of one person.

,_

The 1980 census counts for Delta Township revealed that a significant
difference exists between the population per household figures for
multiple family units and single family detached units. An analysis of
census tracts which consist solely of single-family detached dwellings
revealed that the population per household figure is generally between
3.0 and 3.6 while the population per household figure for census tracts
which were occupied by multiple units ranged from approximately 1.5 to 1.7.
The decline in persons per household while the population increases has
implications as to the demand for and type of dwelling to be provided
for in future years. Based on present trends, it appears that the population per household figure in Delta Township will continue to decline.
This trend will very likely result in a demand for smaller dwelling units
and a decrease in the school age population.

1

II

Population Projections
Estimates of future population are important in the planning process to the
extent they provide general indications of probable land consumption, school
enrollments, public facility use demand and similar impacts. This section
provides population estimates for 1985, 1990 and the year 2000 within Delta
Township. Basic methodology is a regional cohort-survival model with
apportionment among minor civil divisions to consider affects of net
migration. Net migration has been developed from two sources: (1) trend
increases in Delta Township population in excess of expected cohort-survival
totals and (2) increases in reported household tax return exemptions on U.S.
Census Bureau data. Table P-4 provides the population projections for Delta
Township, Eaton County and the Five-Township Metropolitan Area, and the TriCounty Region through the year 2000.
TABLE P-4
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
TO THE YEAR 2000
1980*

1985

1990

2000

Delta Township

23,822

26,138

29,355

34,466

Eaton County

88,337

92,965

101,222

113,800

Five-Township Area

271,661

291,537

306,180

337,145

Tri-County Region

419,750

443,270

475,750

527,999

*1980 population figures represent the final 1980 census
counts. Source: Population Projections for the Tri- County
Region, 12/15/77, Tri-County Regional Planning Commission,
Lansing, Michigan.

32

�-

I
Table P-4 suggests Delta Township, in comparison with other areas in the
Tri-County Region, will continue to evidence a significant growth rate,
though not as dramatic as occurred in the 1950-1970 period. The real
increase in Township population is expected to average 500-550 persons
per year through the planning period. The population projections for
the year 2000 indicate that Delta Township will experience a 45 percent
population increase, the Five-Township area a 26 percent increase, 29
percent for Eaton County and a 27 percent increase for the entire TriCounty Region.
Population projection is not an exact science and is affected by numerous
factors in the local projection area. Increases in employment beyond that
expected, recessionary periods, amenities of a community and other factors
all influence the amount of inmigration. Also, a community's growth policy
may have a significant impact on the population change. If Delta Township
should institute a growth policy requiring phasing of development on lands
adequately served by utilities, parks, schools, roads and other services,
the estimates of population increase would be different from those being
projected. The presentation of estimated population herein has presumed
no such growth policy.
The declining household size suggests a leveling off or actual decline of
school-age children during the planning period. This will affect school
facility planning. The trend toward fewer persons per household may be of
importance as to development regulations pertaining to minimum dwelling
unit size and also as to minimum parking space requirements, especially in
multiple housing developments.

33
7

��COMMERCIAL BASE ANALYSIS
Commercial facilities in Delta Township are presently located in four
principal areas: The Delta Central Business District (CBD); on Saginaw
Highway east of Elmwood Road, on Saginaw Highway west of Mall Drive West,
and at the Waverly Plaza along Waverly Road.
The Delta Central Business District consists of an enclosed mall shopping
center, the Lansing Mall, which contains the Hudson's, Penny's and Montgomery
Ward Department Stores, as well as Meijer Thrifty Acres, K-Mart and Dornet
Village which are located on the south side of Saginaw Highway across from
the Lansing Mall. The stores of the Delta CBD comprise a comparison shopping magnet of regional significance. Although the Lansing Mall-K-MartMeijer Thrifty Acre group was not planned in a related fashion and is
bisected by the traffic pattern of Saginaw Highway, this grouping of major
stores does function as an interrelated business district.
The commercial district located on Saginaw Highway east of Elmwood Road consists largely of commercial strip developments which were primarily constructed during the period of 1965 to 1975. There is little or no functional
transition between the types of commercial uses in this strip, and the area
is generally congested and unattractive. The area along Saginaw Highway west
of Mall Drive West is evidencing a similar trend toward total strip development which will probably be reached unless alternative land development policies are implemented. With the exception of the Waverly Plaza, the commercial development on the west side of Waverly Road is of a strip nature.
However, existing retail stores are separated by large distances of non-commercial usage so that a true strip character has not yet emerged.
/

I

Characteristics of Existing Commercial Development
Types of
Commercial
Enterprises
Retail shopping areas within Delta Township have taken on two different and
distinct forms. The first type of commercial development is known as the
shopping center which is defined as "a group of commercial establishments,
planned, developed, owned and managed as a unit related in location, size,
and type of shops to the trade area that the unit serves; it provides onsite parking in definite relationship to the types and sizes of stores.
1Prior to the evolution of the shopping center, retail stores were usually
developed as a miscellaneous collection of individual stores each on a
separate parcel of street frontage. The second type of commercial development is generally referred to as as strip development. This type of development usually fronts on both sides of an arterial roadway and extends inward
for half a block. Strip development is often characterized by an assortment of office and commercial uses requiring relatively small parcels of
land.

1The Community Builders Handbook, Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C.
1968, pg. 264.

34

�-

I

Shopping centers are generally classified as one of three types; the neighborhood, the community, and the regional. The shopping center's type is
determined by its major tenant or tenants rather than site area or square
feet of structures. The Urban Land Institute defines the three types of
shopping centers as follows:
Neighborhood Center - provides for the sale of consumer convenience goods (foods, drugs and sundries) and personal services (laundry and dry cleaning, barbering, shoe repairing,
etc.) for day-by-day living needs of an immediate neighborhood.
It is built around a supermarket as the principal tenant.
In size, the neighborhood center has an average gross
leasable area close to 50,000 square feet.
Community Center - in addition to the convenience goods and
personal services of the neighborhood center, it provides a
wider range of facilities for the sale of soft lines (wearing apparel for men, women and children) and hard lines
(hardware and appliances).
It makes more depth of merchandise available -- variety in sizes, styles, colors and prices.
It is built around a junior department store or a variety
store as the major tenant, in addition to the supermarket.
It does not have a full-line department store, though it
may have a strong specialty store.
In size, the community
center has an average gross leasable area of about 150,000
square feet, but the range is between 100,000 square feet
and 300,000 square feet.
Regional Center - provides for general merchandise, apparel,
furniture and home furnishings in full depth and variety.
It is built around a full-line department store as the major
drawing power. For even greater depth and variety in comparative shopping, two department stores, or even three or more,
are being included in the tenancy.
In size, the regional center
has an average gross leasable area of 400,000 square feet.
Regional centers range in area from 100,000 square feet up to
1,000,000 square feet or more.

/

There are examples of these three types of shopping centers within Delta
Township: Neighborhood Center - the West Saginaw Plaza, located northwest of the intersection of Saginaw Highway and Waverly Road, which consists of approximately 55,000 square feet.
Community Center - the Waverly
Plaza, located southwest of the intersection of St. Joe Highway and Waverly Road, which consists of approximately 180,000 square feet.
Regional
Center - the Lansing Mall, located northwest of the intersection of Saginaw Highway and Elmwood Road, which consists of approximately 1,000,000
square feet.
Location of Types of
Commercial Enterprises
The majority of the Township's comparison retail stores are located in the
Delta Central Business District.
Department and apparel stores are more
likely to be located in the Delta Central Business District than any other
commercial area within the Township.
The majority of the Township's retail
convenience stores are located on Saginaw Highway east of Elmwood Road.
The fact that convenience stores have yet to decentralize on a neighbor-

35

7

�hood level throughout the Township could be attributed to two factors:
1) Delta Township households are very auto-oriented, therefore, it is
not an inconvenience for the majority of residents to drive several miles
to purchase day-to-day necessities, 2) many residents oppose the establishment of any type of commercial development in their residential
neighborhoods due to the fear that the commercial development would
change the residential character.
Fast-food restaurants are presently conceptrated on Saginaw Highway east
of Elmwood Road due to the high visibility and traffic exposure offered by this area. Quality sit-down restaurants are much more dispersed
throughout the Township than the fast-food outlets. It should be noted
that the recent trend of converting gasoline station structures to other
retail uses has frequently occurred in Delta Township.
I
I

Reasons for
Locating
Commercial Uses
Delta Township has experienced steady growth in commercial development
over the past decade. There are several reasons which account for retail
merchants desiring to locate in Delta Township: the Township's arterial
stre2t pattern affords good traffic access while providing excellent
exposure to retail firms; the availability of land within the Township,
when compared to more urbanized and centralized locations in the
Lansing Metropolitan Area, is a primary locational factor; and the
existence of adequate public services makes the area attractive for commercial development. The steady increases in the Township's population
over past decades, as well as the area's growth potential, is another
inducement to retail firms. The existence of a regional shopping
center such as the Lansing Mall also serves as an inducement for commercial development to locate in the area. Finally, Delta Township constitutes a new market place within the Lansing Metropolitan Area.

/

II

Projection of Future Commercial Development
In analyzing and projecting Delta Township's commercial facilities requirements ., it is necessary to distinguish between two basic kinds of shopping
needs. First, comparison facilities must be provided to serve the needs
for clothing, furniture, household appliances, and other major items.
Secondly, convenience facilities such as groceries, drug stores, and barber
shops will be required to serve daily shopping needs. This section will
analyze Delta Township's comparison shopping needs as well as several
of the more significant convenience shopping needs such as food stores, drug
stores, hardware stores and restaurants. There are five basic steps required
to project the facilities .needed to serve comparison and basic convenience
shopping needs.
First, the primary trade areas to be served by comparison and convenience
shopping facilities must be determined. Generally, the trade area of convenience facilities is limited to surrounding residential neighborhoods,
while the trade area for a regional comparison shopping center includes
a large portion of the Lansing Metropolitan Area.

36

�-

I

FIGURE C-I
FIVE MILE TRADE AREA
DELTA TOWNSHIP CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

0
&lt;{

0

"'.....
.....

j;
w

DEWITT TOWNSHIP

0

.....

w
w

"'.....
V)

~
I
I

r--""'

r

I

1-96

CEDAR PARK CENTER

37
7

�The second step required to project the need for comparison and convenience shopping facilities is to determine future total sales in various
retail categories within the trade area. Determination of trade area
future total retail sales is dependent upon changes in population, purchasing power and expenditure patterns within the trade area.
The third step is to determine the proportion of total trade area retail
sales that will accrue to the projected facilities. Convenience facilities are considered to draw business throughout their trade area. The
proportion of total trade area retail sales that comparison facilities
will draw is dependent upon a number of factors, most important of which
is the relative quality and location of competitive facil i ties.
The fourth step is to determine the amount of square foc.tage required to
sustain the proportion of total trade area retail sales that the facilities
will generate. This determination can be based on current projected
marketing standards.
The final step is to compare the projected future requirements with existing facilities. This comparison will indicate the extent to which
new facilities will be required.
In determining future comparison shopping facilities needs, attention will
be focused on the concentration of comparison facilities centered in the
Delta Central Business District. These facilities include the Lansing
Mall Stores, Meijer Thrifty Acres, K-Mart, and Dornet Village. Further,
the stores of the Delta Central Business District can be meaningfully
compared with other major shopping areas in and near the trade area.
This comparison will be the basis of assessing the impact of these stores
on the trade area.
Determination of Comparison
Shopping Trade Area
The first step required to analyze the major comparison facilities in and
near the Lansing Mall is to determine the trade area served by these facilities. The experience of regional shopping centers in other metropolitan
areas indicates that such centers draw a major portion of their customers
from within a three to five mile radius. Because it is located in a sparsely settled region, the Delta Central Business District would most likely
have a trade area approximated by a five mile radius. This trade area is
indicated in Figure C-1. It encompasses virtually all of Delta Township,
most of the western half of the City of Lansing-Lansing Township area, as
well as significant portions of Watertown and DeWitt Townships.
While it is assumed that 50 percent of the Delta CBD c ustomers live bey onc
the five mile trade area, it is probable that in the future this percentage
will decrease. AsDeltaTownship becomes more densely populated, it will
contribute more and more patrons to the stores of the Delta CED. Furthermore, insofar as the areas surrounding Delta Township remain rural, they
will be less significant to the stores of the Delta CBD. As some areas
near Delta Township become more highly urbanized, they can be expected to
develop their own comparison shopping facilities. This will reduce the
demand that would otherwise be placed on Delta Township's facilities.

38

�-

•

conversely, because of the Tri-County Region's excellent highway
system and the expected future pattern of population gr·owth, it is likely
that the stores of the Delta CBD will continue to play a large role in fulfilling the comparison shopping needs of people living in the outlying portions of the Tri-County Region. Based on the foregoing considerations, it
is assumed that by the year 2000 approximately 60 percent of the patons of
the Delta CBD stores will live within the five mile trade area. While this
judgment should not be interpreted as a firm prediction, it will be useful
as a basis for further analysis.
Determination of Convenience
Shopping Trade Area
Having determined the trade area of Delta Township's comparison shopping
facilities, attention is now directed to consideration of the trade area
of Delto Township's convenience shopping facilities. As previously noted,
convenience shopping facilities generally have a limited trade area. This
is understandable because of the frequency with which they are patronized
by individual customers. Because people are reluctant to travel far to
satisfy daily shopping needs and because of the amount of traffic generated
by convenience shopping trips, convenience stores ideally should have a
trade area no larger than a grouping of neighborhoods. Therefore, the exact
distributi on of trade area delineations for convenience shopping facilities
in Delta Township will depend upon the neighborhood unit plan. The present
analysis will restrict itself to specifying the total amount of convenience
shopping facilities which will be required to serve Delta Township's projected year 2000 population.
Projection of
Future Retail Sales
The second major step required to analyze and project the need for comparison
and convenience shopping facilities within Delta Township is to determine
trade area future total sales in various retail categories. Determination of
trade area future total retail sales is dependent upon three factors: 1) population growth within the trade area, 2) growth in per capita retail expenditures within the trade area, and 3) trade area changes in retail expenditure
patterns.
Current and projected populations for the trade area are presented in Table
C-1. This table divides the trade area into the following units: Delta
Township, the Lansing-Lansing Township area, Watertown and DeWitt Townships.
Population increases in the Lansing and Lansing Township portions of the
trade area were determined from projections of the total population of
Lansing and Lansing Township by using a two-step procedure. First, the
Lansing-Lansing Township area was surveyed to determine the distribution
of vacant residential land which might accommodate increases in population.
Second, future land development trends envisioned by the Tri-County Regional
Planning Commission for the Lansing-Lansing Township area were evaluated
for their probable impact on the development of vacant residential land.
Consideration was given to the projected distribution and extent of various
densities of development. Based on the distribution of vacant residential
land and expected development trends, one-half of the projected population
increase for the Lansing-Lansing Township area was allocated to the portions
of Lansing and Lansing Township lying within the five mile trade area.

39
]

�TABLE C-1
FIVE-MILE TRADE AREA POPULATION PROJECTIONS
/

Political Subdivision
of the Trade Area

1980*

1990

2000

Delta Township

23,822

29,355

34,466

Lansing-Lansing Twp. Area

68,100

75,063

76,238

Watertown Township

1,200

1,904

1,923

DeWitt Township

1,900

2,859

3,543

Data Source:

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission, 12/15/77.

*1980 population figures represent final census counts, February, 1982.

The portions of DeWitt and Watertown Townships' populations living within
the five-mile trade area were determined by the same methodology as was
applied to the Lansing-Lansing Township portion of the trade area. The
portion of the two townships' 1980 population living within the trade area
was estimated on the basis of the existing pattern of residential development.
The portion of the two townships' 1980 through year 2000 populations
living within the trade area was determined from Tri-County Regional Planning Commission population projections. Population increases were allocated
to the five-mile trade area on the basis of the availability of residential
land and expected development trends.
It was determined that approximately
one-fifth of DeWitt Township's 1980 through the year 2000 population is or
will be living within the five mile trade area.
It was also determined
that approximately one-third of Watertown Township's 1980 through the year
2000 populations are or will be living within the trade area.
The second factor bearing on future trade area retail sales is future per
capita retail expenditures.
Future per capita retail expenditures can be
determined by estimating projected increases in real per capita purchasing
power and applying such a projection to an estimate of current per capita
retail expenditures.
During the period of 1969 to 1974 per capita incomes within the Tri-County
Re8ion increased 38.4 percent. Per capita income is computed by dividing
the residence-adjusted total personal income by population estimates.2
In order to account for inflation during the 1969 to 1974 period, the increases in the U.S. City Average Consumer Price Index were applied to the
increases in per capita incomes.
The U.S. City Average Consumer Price
Index figures are derived by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics based
on a cross sampling of 56 U.S. cities. According to the U.S. Bureau of
Labor, the U.S. City Average Consumer Price Index figure is more indicative of the impact of inflation on the Lansing Area than either the
U.S. or Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area Consumer Price Index figures.
The U.S. City Average Consumer Price Index increased 34.5 percent during
the period of 1969 to 1974. When the 34.5 percent increase in the consumer

2The source of the per capita income figures was Current Population Reports,
U.S. Bureau of Census, Series P-25, Number 670.
40

�-

•

price index is subtracted from the 38.4 percent increase in per capita incomes,
the result is a "real" growth rate of 3.9 percent for the period or .78 percent per annum. This .78 percent annual "real" growth rate was then applied
to the period of 1975 to the year 2000 in order to arrive at a projected year
2000 Tri-County per capita income.
In order to determine what percentage of the year 2000 inflation adjusted per
capita money incomes would be ci2vt2t.~1 to retail expenditures, a national index was applied. In 1975 the U.S. per capita personal income was $5,903 of
which $2,746 or 47 percent was devoted to retail e xpenditures. Applying this
percentage to the projected year 2000 Tri-County inflation adjusted per capita
money income of $5,502 results in an inflation adjusted per capita money income retail expenditure in the year 2000 of $2,586.
TABLE C-2
YEAR 2000 TRI-COUNTY PROJECTED PER CAPITA
RETAIL EXPENDITURE PATTERNS(l)
Total Retail Spending

$2,586

Total Comparison Store Spending
Department Store

853
491

Variety Store

13

Apparel and Accessory

129

Furniture and Appliance

91

Other Comparison Store

129

Total Convenience Store Spending
Food and Liquor

518
440

Drugs

52

Hardware

26

Eating and Drinking

310

Other Retail Expenditures

905

(1) Based on 1969 dollars.
Source:

Table by Delta Township Planning Department based on
a projection of Tri-County Region retail expenditure
patterns developed by the staff.

Table C-2 presents the Year 2000 estimate of total per capita retail expenditures along with a breakdown of how the total expenditure is epxected to be
allocated to various retail categories.
41

A

�TABLE C-3
CHANGES IN RETAIL EXPENDITURE PATTERNS FOR
THE TRI-COUNTY REGION AND EATON COUNTY
Tri-County Region
1963

Tri-County Region
1967

Eaton County
1967

Eaton County
1972

Percent of
Total

Percent of
Total

Percent of
Total

Percent of
Total

100.0%

100. 0%

100. 0%

100. 0%

Total Comparison
Store Spending

28.1%

32.9%

43%

56%

Department
Store

11.0%

16.3%

2%

2%

Variety
Store

2.3%

1. 3%

*

*

Apparel and
Accessory

4.3%

5.0%

3%

6%

Furniture and
Appliance

4.2%

4.5%

5%

4%

Other Comparison Store

6.3%

5.8%

33%

44%

28.2%

25.1%

32%

24%

23.9%

21.4%

29%

21%

Drugs

3.0%

2.8%

3%

3%

Hardware

1. 3%

0.9%

*

*

Eating and
Drinking

5.9%

6. 7%

7%

9%

Other Retail
Expenditures

37.9%

40.1%

18%

6%

Total
Retail
Spending

Total Convenience
Store Spending
Food and
Liquor

-

Source:

Tri-County data contained in the 1967 Census of Business, Major Retail Centers,
Eaton County data containec in Economic Profile of Eaton County, Office of
Economic Expansion, Michigan Department of Commerce, September 1975, Sheet #6.1.
*Data not available for this category.
42

�Changes in Retail
Expenditure Patterns
The third factor bearing on future trade area retail sales is current and
expected changes in retail expenditure patterns. Table C-3 presents retail expenditure patterns in the Tri-County Region for the years 1963 and
1967 and retail expenditure patterns for Eaton County for the years 1967
to 1972. The table indicates total expenditures in various comparison
and convenience retail categories.
Three aspects of retail expenditures within the Tri-County Region deserve
particular attention. First, within the general comparison category, the
relative growth in department store sales at the expense of sales in other
comparison facilities is notable. This Tri-County regional trend is reflective of a national trend that has been going on for several years.
All other comparison retail categories fared less well than did the department store category. Apparel and accessory stores and furniture and
appliance stores posted gains well below the comparison store average.
Variety and specialty stores actually showed a decrease in their proportion of total retail sales. The relative increase in department store
sales in conjunction with the relative decrease in other comparison store
sales is evidence of the superior drawing power of the multifaceted department store approach to comparison goods merchandising.
It should be pointed out that the variety store has suffered most from the
impact of the department store. This should be expected in view of the
fact that the two types of stores are similar, with the exception that the
department store actually offers a greater variety of merchandise. Because
of the substantial marketing edge of department stores over variety stores,
it can be expected that department stores will continue to increase their
sales at the expense of variety stores. The fact that apparel and accessory, furniture, appliance and specialty stores have not fared quite as
badly against department stores as have variety stores probably reflects an
advantage of specialization. Another important reason why these stores have
not lost more ground to department stores is the modern tendency to group
them with department stores and other specialty stores in shopping centers.
This creates a complex of stores which all benefit from the drawing power
of the major department store.
The second notable feature of Tri-County regional retail expenditures pertains to the food and liquor category. This category has experienced a decline which is attributable to a steady increase in per capita incomes, a
rise in the efficiency of food production and distribution techniques, and
and an increase in the number of meals which are consumed outside the home.
The steady growth within the fast-food industry durin~ the 1970's is expected to continue into the future.
The third significant feature is the fact that comparison store and other
retail expenditure categories have each shared approximately one-third of
the total sum devoted to retail expenditures. The convenience store category has recently experienced a small decline which has been offset by
growth in the eating and drinking category.

43

�Based on the foregoing analysis, an allocation of the year 2000 per capita
retail expenditures to various retail categories was determined. As previously noted, this allocation of the year 2000 per capita retail expenditures
to various retail categories is presented in Table C-2. It should be noted
that the large proportion of total expenditures classified in Tables C-2 and
C-3 as "Other Retail Expenditures" represents two groups of expenditures.
These groups are automobile dealership expenditures and non-hardware building materials expenditures. Automobile de a l ership expenditures are not isolated for special attention because of the fact that automobiles represent
such a major comparison purchase that standard methods of analysis involving considerations of limited trade areas do not apply. Thus, it is difficult to determine the need for automobile dealerships based on the concept
of a five mile trade area. The need for building material supplies, like
the need for automobile dealerships, is difficult to determine on the basis
of a relatively limited trade area. Furthermore, the various kinds of facilities, ranging in character from lumber yards to plumbing stores, required
to merchandise building material supplies vary greatly in the amount of
space required to serve the need for building material supplies based on projections of dollar volume of sales.

•

Having determined a projection of the year 2000 per capita expenditures in
various retail categories and having also determined the population of the
various zones of the trade area of Delta Township's major comparison shopping facilities, it is now possible to determine the total future ret~il
expenditures that will be generated within the various zones of the trade
area. This determination is based upon population multiplied by per capita
expenditures. The results of this multiplication are presented in Table C-4.
Comparison expenditures are presented for all zones of the trade area because
all zones will contribute business to the comparison shopping facilities of
Delta Township. Convenience expenditures are presented only for Delta Township beca u se Delta Township's convenience facilities will be supported primarily by local residents.
The third factor determining the impact of loss on the various zones of the
trade area is the distance of the Delta CBD and the distance of competing
facilities from the various zones of the trade area. The further away the
Delta CBD is from the center of population of a trade area zone, the smaller
the proportion of total retail sales generated within the trade area zone
that will accrue to the Delta CBD will be. Conversely, the farther away
competing facilities are from the center of population of a trade area zone,
the larger will be Delta Central Business District's proportion of the trade
area zone's retail sales.

•

Having determined the future retail expenditure pattern for the comparison
and convenience trade area of Delta Township, attention will now be directed
to determining the proportion of future comparison and convenience sales generated within the trade area that will be spent in Delta Township's retail
facilities. This determination is quite simple with respect to convenience
type retail sales. As noted earlier, convenience stores do business within
their relatively limited trade areas. Therefore, it will be assumed that
all convenience sales potential generated within Delta Township will be
spent in Delta Township. This assumption is dependent upon the provision of
sufficient properly located convenience merchandise outlets to allow full
realization of their potential .

44

�....

I

TABLE C-4
YEAR 2000 PROJECTED TRADE AREA RETAIL EXPENDITURES(l)
Dewitt
Township

Watertown
Township

Total from
Beyond Delta
Township

$65,031,000

$3,022,000

$1,640,000

$69,693,000

16,923,000

37,433,000

1,740,000

944,000

40,117,000

448,000

991,000

46,000

25,000

1,062,000

Apparel and
Accessory

4,446,000

9,835,000

457,000

248,000

10,540,000

Furniture and
Appliance

3,136,000

6,938,000

322,000

175,000

7,435,000

Other Comparison Store

4,446,000

9,835,000

457,000

248,000

10,540,000

Delta
Township
Total Comparison Store
Spending
S29,399,000
Department
Store
Variety
Store

Total Convenience Store
Spending
Food and
Liquor

City of Lansing
Lansing Township

R'
17,853,000
15,165,000
1,792,000

Drugs

896,000

Hardware
Eating and
Drinking

10,684,000

(l)Based on 1969 dollars.
Source:

Table by Delta Township Planning Department based on data presented in
Tables C-2 and C-3.
Determination of Accrual
of Future Trade Area Sales
to Delta Township
Determination of the proportion of future trade area comparison retail sales
that will accrue to Delta Township's major comparison facilities is a complicated task involving three considerations. These three considerations are
(1) the existence of competitive facilities, (2) the relative attractiveness
of competitive facilities, and (3) the distance of Delta Township's comparison facilities and their competitors from the various zones of the trade area.
45

�The first consideration in determining the proportion of total trade area
comparison sales accruing to Delta Township's comparison facilities is the
existence of competitive facilities. An investigation of retail sales outlets within the Tri-County Region led to the conclusion that there are two
regional shopping centers and three community shopping centers in direct
competition for the retail sales that will be generated within the trade
area of the Delta Central Business District. The two regional shopping
centers in competition with the Delta Central Business District are the
Frandor Shopping Center and Meridian Mall. The three community shopping
centers in competition with the Delta Central Business District are the
Waverly Plaza, Logan Center, and Edgemont Center. The City of Lansing's
Central Business District is also located within the delineated trade area
and competes with the stores of the Delta Central Business District.
Although the City of Grand Ledge shopping area is not located within the
five mile trade area, it does have an impact on the Delta CBD.
Table C-5 provides a listing of neighborhood and regional shopping centers
within the Tri-County area. Although this list is not all inclusive, it
does include those shopping centers which have the most impact on the Delta
CBD's five mile trade area.
The second primary consideration which impacts the Delta Central Business
District is the relative attractiveness of the enumerated competitive facilities. Six factors must be weighed in evaluating the relative attractiveness
of the competitive comparison facilities. Three of these factors are related
to accessibility and circulation: 1) the ease of accessibility to the various
competitive facilities as determined by surrounding street patterns; 2) the
availability of convenient parking spaces; and 3) the features of internal
vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns which facilitate or hinder
customer use. A fourth important consideration influencing the relative
attractiveness of competitive shopping facilities will be the existence or
absence of climate control advantages common in modern shopping malls. The
fifth factor pertaining to the relative attractiveness of competitive shopping facilities will be the drawing power of major department stores associated with those facilities. The sixth and most basic consideration pertaining to the relative attractiveness of competitive facilities will be
their total size.
The Delta Central Business District and the competing comparison shopping
facilities were evaluated in terms of the six criteria of attractiveness.
It was determined that the three regional shopping centers were of approximately equal attractiveness when judged on the basis of all six criteria.
Of course, all of the main shopping areas have distinctive features by
which they are uniquely characterized. However, negative features in each
shopping area tended to be balanced by equally positive features in the
same area.
Based on the number of shopping facilities in ~ompetition with the Delta
Central Business District and on the relative attractiveness of those facilities and the distance of the Delta Central Business District and competing
shopping facilities from the center of population of the various Lansing
Mall trade area zones, a determination was made as to the proportion of
total trade area retail sales which would accrue to the Delta Central Business District. It was determined that the Delta Central Business District

46

�-,
would receive approximately 85 percent of the total retail sales generated
within the Delta Township portion of its trade area, 15 percent of the retail sales generated within the Lansing-Lansing Township area, 15 percent
of the retail sales generated within DeWitt Township and 30 percent of the
retail sales generated within Watertown Township.
TABLE C-5
NEIGHBORHOOD AND REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITHIN THE TRI-COUNTY AREA
Gross Leasable
Floor Area (sq. ft.)*

Name
Lansing Mall

Number of
Stores*

1,000,000

105

Frandor

550,000

100

Meridian Mall

6b,0,000

116

284,000

18

Logan Center

238,000

27

Meridian Township Meijer

220,000

1

Waverly Plaza

182,000

15

South Lansing Meijer

175,000

1

Cedar Park Center

112,000

25

Edgemont Shopping Center

110,000

12

Michigan Ave. Eberhard/Rogers Complex

110,000

3

Haslett Village Square

80,000

20

West Saginaw Plaza

58,000

7

Country Meadows Village Center

55,000

14

Bath Corners Shopping Center

37,000

8

Granger Mall

30,000

9

Willow Plaza

25,000

6

West Saginaw Hwy. Meijer,

K-Mart, Dornet Village

&gt;'&lt;The square footage of the various retail facilities and the number of
stores within them are subject to constant change. The square footage
figures and retail store figures include vacant units.

47

�Based on the foregoing determination of the proportion of total retail sales
generated within the different zones of the trade area which are attributable
to the Delta Central Business District, and upon data presented in Table C-4,
a determination was made of future total trade area retail expenditures accruing to the Delta Central Business District. The proportion of total trade
area retail expenditures accruing to the Delta Central Business District is
presented in Table C-6.
TABLE C-6
PROPORTION OF TOTAL TRADE AREA RETAIL EXPENDITURES
ACCRUING TO THE DELTA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IN THE YEAR 2000(l)
Delta
Township
Total Comparison Store

City of Lansing
Lansing Township

Dewitt
Township

Watertown
Township

Total From
Beyond Delta
Township

$24,989,000

$9,755,000

$453,000

$492,000

$10,700,000

14,385,000

5,615,000

261,000

283,000

6,159,000

381,000

149,000

7,000

8,000

164,000

Apparel and
Accessory

3,779,000

1,475,000

69,000

74,000

1,618,000

Furniture and
Appliance

2,666,000

1,041,000

48,000

53,000

1,142,000

Other Comparison Store

3,779,000

1,475,000

69,000

74,000

1,618,000

Department
Store
Variety
Store

Total Convenience Store
Food and
Liquor

17,853,000
15,165,000

Drugs

1,792,000

Hardware

896,000

Eating and
Drinking

10,684,000

(l;Based on 1969 dollars.

•

Source:

Table by Delta Township Planning Department based on data presented in
Table C-4.

48

�•

TABLE C-7
RETAIL FLOOR SPACE REQUIRED TO SERVE 2000 RETAIL EXPENDITURE PATTERNS
City of Lansing, DeWitt,
Watertown and Lansing
Townships Portion of the
Trade Area

Delta Township Portion
of the Trade Area

Expendltures 1
Comparison Store
Oepartment Store
Variety Store
Apparel and Accessory
Furniture and Appliance
Other Comparison Store

Sales Per
~uare Foot

$24,989,000

Required
Floor Area
in Square
Feet

Expend! tures

442,000

$10,700,000

Sales Per
Sguare Foot

Total Trade
Area
Requ 1red Floor
Area in Sguare Feet

Non-Trade
Area
Requ1 red Floor
Area in Sguare Feet

Tota 1 Trade Area
And Non-Trade Area
Required Floor
Area In Sguare Feet

189,000

631,000

422,000

1,053,000

112,000

374,000

262,000

636,000
24,000

14,385,000

$55

262,000

6,159,000

$55

381,000

$40

10,000

164,000

$40

4,000

14,000

10,000

1,618,000

$70

23,000

77,000

34,000

23,000

76,000

53,000

129,000

27,000

90,000

63,000

153,000

3,779,000
2,666,000
3,779,000

$70

54,000

$50

53,000

I, 142,000

$50

$60

63,000

1,618,000

$60

91,000

218,000

Convenience Store

17,853,000

Food and liquor

15,165,000

$175

87,000

1,792,000

$95

19,000

896,000

$50

18,000

10,684,000

$80

134,000

Drugs

1

Required
F10or Area
in Square
Feet

.i:,-

'-0

Hardware
Eating and Drinking

~Based on 1969 dollars.
Sales per square foot information derived from Dollars and Cents of Sho~ping Centers: 1975, Urban Land Institute .
Sales per square foot figures represent an average of sales per square foot f gures for Regional, Community, and Neighborhood Shopping Centers.
Source:

Table by Delta Township Planning Department based on data presented In Table C-6.

))
iii

))

))

J

�Projected Retail Floor
Space Requirements
Table C-7 indicates retail floor space required to serve future trade area
retail expenditure patterns. This table projects required space for comparison, convenience and eating and drinking facilities in the year 2000. The
projections of future required floor area for each category of commercial
activity were developed by dividing projected expenditure levels by established expenditure rates per square foot of commercial space.
Table C-7 also portrays the required floor area of various comparison and
convenience retail facilities for the year 2000. The seventh column of
Table C-7 entitled "Total Trade Area" represents the sum of the required
comparison floor area for the Delta Township portion of the trade area as
well as for the portion of the trade area outside Delta Township. The
total commercial floor space area requirement projected in this column does
not reflect the total amount of commercial facilities which could be sustained within the Delta Central Business District in the year 2000 because,
as previously explained, only 60 percent of the customers will originate
from within the primary trade area. The eighth column in this table,
entitled "Non-Trade Area," indicates the floor area required to serve customers originatinr; from beyond the trade area. The final column in Table
C-7 indicates the floor area which can be sustained by both the Central
Business District trade area and non-trade area customers. The year 2000
convenience shopping space requirements are shown in the third column of
Table C-7.

TABLE C-8
COMPARISON OF 1977 AND YEAR 2000 REQUIRED SHOPPING FACILITIES
Floor Area of
Existing Facilities
in Square Feet (1977)

Name
Total Comparison
Store

Floor Area Required Additional
Facilities in Sq. Ft.

1,051,290

1,053,000

1,710

734,281
20,000
100,861
38,240
157,908

636,000
24,000
91,000
129,000
153,000

-98,281
4,000
-9,861
90,760
-4,908

140,937

124,000

-16,937

Food and Liquor
Drugs
Hardware

125,337
5,400
10, 100

87,000
19,000
18,000

-38,337
13,600
7,900

Eating and Drinking

94,229

134,000

39,771

Department Store
Variety Store
Apparel and Accessory
Furniture and Appliance
Other Comparison Store
Total Convenience Store

""

Projected Requirements in Square
Feet (year 2000)

Source :

Delta Township Planning Department

50

�-,

I

Table C-8 compares existing commercial space in Delta Township with projected
commercial space requirements for the year 2000.
/

III

Major Findings of the Commercial Base Analysis
In view of the foregoing analyses of existing and projected characteristics
of Delta Township's commercial base, the following conclusions are significant in the development of the Township's Comprehensive Plan:
1.

When projected year 2000 retail expenditure patterns are applied to population projections for the same period, the floor area of existing comparison commercial facilities within Delta Township nearly equals the projected need for the year 2000. The greatest need exists in the furniture
and appliance store category where it is projected that an additional
90,000 square feet of additional space will be needed by the year 2000.
On the other hand, existing department store space should more than satisfy Delta Township's needs for the year 2000.
Within the convenience store category it is projected that Delta Township
will need an additional 14,000 square feet of drug store space and an additional 8,000 square feet of hardware store space.
It is estimated that
a need for 40,000 square feet of additional eating and drinking space will
exist by the year 2000.

2.

During the late 1970's a significant amount of commercial development took
place within the Delta Central Business District; foremost among these developments was the Lansing Mall expansion.
The upgrading of the roadways
surrounding this area will help to insure the continued viability of this
area. A large share of the remaining undeveloped land in the area consists of parcels of one acre or less which lack arterial road frontage.

3.

In spite of a low vacancy rate and the renovation of a number of commercial
properties in the area, the commercial strip along West Saginaw Highway
east of Elmwood Road evidences early signs of potential blight and decline.
Existing efforts should be continued to solve local traffic ingress and
egress problems, reduce the excessive number of driveways penetrating
Saginaw Highway, promote the concept of a service drive paralleling the
arterial roadway, regulate the profileration of signs, and provide for
landscaping provisions within commercial areas.

4.

Presently, Delta Township is lacking an adequate number and distribution
of neighborhood level convenience shopping facilities.
Despite the autooriented nature of local residents, a policy advocating neighborhood level
convenience shopping areas should be adopted.

5.

The
way
the
ket

6.

Portions of Waverly Road evidence the same trend toward excessive strip
commercial development which has occurred on Saginaw Highway. However,
it is still possible to prevent this excessive growth of commercial strip
development on Waverly Road through effectuation of appropriate planning
policies.

existing strip commercial development along both sides of Saginaw Highshould be contained within its existing boundaries.
Development of
remaining vacant parcels within these areas will occur due to the mardemand for commercial properties at high traffic locations.

51

��INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS
The largest single tract of industrially zoned land in the Lansing Metropolitan Area lies within Delta Township. Located in the southeast quadrant of the Township, the industrial tract experienced a significant
amount of development during the 1970's. This section begins with a discussion of the Township's existing industrial development which includes
a listing of major industrial firms within the Township. The second
portion of this section provides projections for future industrial development in the Township and also notes recent trends in industrial
employment.

I

Analysis of Delta Township's Existing Industrial Base
The principal industrial, wholesaling and distribution activities in the
Township are concentrated within the Delta Township Industrial Tract.
This 2100-acre area of land is generally bounded by Mt. Hope Highway on
the north, US-27/Temporary 1-69 on the east and southeast, and 1-96 on
the west and southwest. Three major facilities are situated in this
tract including the Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant, Meijer Distribution
Center and the Erickson Electric Generating Station owned by the Lansing
Board of Water and Light. The industrial tract also includes the area -~
bounded by I-496 to the north, Mt. Hope Highway to the south, Waverly
Road to the east and Homeland Subdivision to the west. This area includes
three major industrial facilities being the General Motors Part Warehouse,
Jacklin Steel and Douglas Steel. Figure I-I illustrates the location of
the Delta Township Industrial Tract.
The proximity of Delta Township's industrial tract to major interstate
highway connections is a local manifestation of the Lansing Metropolitan
Area's position as the economic hub of central Michigan. The Grand Trunk
Western Railroad also plays an important role in the activities of Delta
Township's industrial, warehousing and distribution operations. The General Motors Parts Warehouse and Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant extensively
utilize the railroad for incoming and outgoing shipments. The Meijer
Distribution Center receives most food goods by rail and thereafter, the
bulk of the goods is trucked to Meijer retail stores throughout Michigan.
The Grand Trunk Railroad line has evidenced its intention to expand services to the industrial tract by construction of new marshalling yards
(1971), an auto port (1975-76), new spur tracks to the Meijer Distribution Center (1975) and new spur tracks to the Oldsmobile Diesel Engine
Plant (1980).
Composition of
Existing Industry
Delta Township's full range of industrial, warehousing and distribution
activities is shown in Table 1-1. This table illustrates the number of
Delta Township firms engaged in various industrial, warehousing and distribution activities. Table I-1 indicates that a major portion of Delta
Township's industrial firms are engaged in some form of distribution.
Included in the distribution group is the General Motors Parts Distribution Center discussed earlier along with the Meijer and Coca-Cola Distribution Centers. The other firms represented in the distribution group
are comparatively small transfer and trucking operations. Most of the
establishments engaged in distribution activities are affiliated with

52

~

�-,

•

-

I

. ..

FIGURE I-I
DELTA TOWNSHIP
INDUSTRIAL TRACT

Industrial Tract Location
within Delta Township

ST. J

E

HWY.

MT H PE HWY.

-&lt;
::0

0

DAVIS

HWY.

J

Illustration of Delta Township Industrial Tract
53

LY RD.

�finns carrying on operations outside the Lansing Metropolitan Area. With
the exception of the General Motors Parts Distribution Center and Meijer
Distribution Center, firms engaging in distribution activities employ
relatively few people in their local operations.
During the 197O's a significant number of new industrial firms, the majority
of which were associated with distribution of materials and goods, located
in the industrial tract. This trend suggests that the location and access
characteristics of the industrial tract are highly desirable. Typically,
firms providing common carrier and freight transportation services require
highly accessible locations to both metropolitan and regional service areas.
TABLE I-1
MAJOR BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS LOCATED IN DELTA TOWNSHIP's INDUSTRIAL TRACT
Construction and Related Activities

Distribution

Ameri-Cel Structures Inc.
Clark Foundation Company
Douglas Steel
Jacklin Steel
T. R. Noyce Construction Company
Rieth-Riley Construction Company
Shreve Steel Company
Tom's Asphalt Paving Company

General Trucking
Alvan Motor Freight
Associated Truck Lines
Blue Arrow Inc.
Bruce Cartage
Central Transport Inc.
Interstate System
Transcon Lines
Tucker Freight Lines
United Trucking Service

Warehousing
Air-Lift Company
Auto-Owners Warehouse
Fann Bureau Warehouse
Manufacturers Service Corporation
Nabisco Warehouse
Sherriff Goslin Company

Atlas Truck Rental and Leasing
Keena Truck Leasing
Ryder Truck Rental and Leasing

Wholesaling

Others

Central Dairy Supply
Flint Pipe and Well Supply
Kendall Electric Company

Coca-Cola Company
General Motors Parts Distribution Center
Hi-Klas Beverage
Lansing Storage Company
Meijer Distribution Center
Stevens Van Lines

Truck Rental

Light Manufacturing
Ideal Company
Heavy Manufacturing
Detroit News Printing Facility
Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant
Utilities and Railroads
Erickson Generating Station
Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Grain Elevators
Millett Elevator Company
Ralston Purina Company
Miscellaneous
A-1 Auto Parts
Canteen Services

54

�....

I

•

Industrial Tract
Land Inventory
Approximately fifty percent of the land within the Delta Industrial Tract
has been developed or is committed to existing industries. The industrial
tract consists of some 2100 acres of land area, of which approximately
1,000 acres are developed or are now being developed. Among the largest
land users are the Erickson Electric Generating Station (305 acres),
Meijer Distribution Complex (250 acres), Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant (280
acres), GeneralMotors Parts Warehouse (195 acres), Coca-Cola (30 acres)
and the Detroit News (12 acres). Industrial-warehousing uses have consumed an estimated 100 acres per year of vacant land during the 1972-1980 period.
Industrial Development Activity in
the Lansing Metro Area
During the 1970's, Delta Township attracted a significant number of industrial warehousing firms. In the 1972-1977 period, approximately 27,000
square feet of manufacturing space was constructed in the Township. During this same time approximately two million square feet of warehousing
space was constructed. In the late 1970's, the following major projects
were constructed within the industrial tract: Oldsmobile Plant Number
Five (1,000,000 square feet), the General Motors Parts Warehouse addition (825,000 square feet), Meijer Hardlines Distribution Building (415,000 square feet), Coca-Cola Warehouse (85,000 square feet) and the Detroit
News printing facility (30,000 square feet).
II

Projection of Future Industrial Development Potential
An analysis and projection of industrial, warehousing and distribution

economic potential will be carried out in four steps. First, attention
will be directed to the overall structure of the Lansing Tri-County
Region's economy. Secondly, consideration will be given to those special
features of the Tri-County economic structure which are important to
industrial, warehousing and distribution economic potential. Thirdly,
regional employment trends in industrial and wholesaling trades will be
analyzed. Finally, projections of future Tri-County industrial and
wholesaling employment will be presented and analyzed in order to determine future development potential for Delta Township.
Tri-County Regional
Economic Structure
The economy of the Tri-County Region is based upon three key elements:
state government, higher education and automobile manufacturing. Having
an economy based on three such diversified elements has benefited the
Lansing area in terms of economic balance and stability that would not
be possible in a more narrowly-based economy. Furthermore, this economic
structure has enabled the Lansing Metropolitan Area to take advantaie of
national growth trends in the three key economic sectors of government,
education and industry and thereby evolve as the economic hub of central
Michigan during the post World War Two period.
Features of the Tri-County regional economy which have a bearing on the
potential for future industrial development are primarily related to the
skills and expertise which exist within the Metropolitan Lansing Area.
55

�The region has facilities and personnel required for basic research
operations. Furthermore, it has a good supply of skilled craftsmen
capable of participating in a broad range of manufacturing activities.
These assets should assure the region steady growth over future
decades.
The durable goods industry of the Lansing Metropolitan Area revolves
around the production o f transportation equipment. Despite conscious
efforts to decentralize the automobile manufacturing industry , the
Lansing area complex of transportation-affiliated industries is expected to retain its national importance as a major automobile manufacturing center. Future expansion of automobile affiliated industries
in the Tri-County Region is expected to depend on national economic and
population trends and local and state governmental policies.
While automobile manufacturing and its ancillary industries f orm the
mainstay of the Lansing Metropolitan Area manufacturing community, there
are numerous non-durable industries. Key non-durables in the Lansing
area are generally the ones classified as central place industries.
Central place industries are characterized by strong ties to locaJ and
regional markets that can be served from a central place. They are dependent upon a highly competitive market. The Meijer Distribution Center
is an example of a central place industry since it operates to service
metropolitan and regional retail outlets of the parent company.
A feature of the Tri-County Re gion which is very important to its potential as a warehousing and distribution center is its strategic location
in the lower central portion of Michigan. As already indicated, the
network of modern highways that link Lansing with other parts of the
state enhance this position. Air and rail transportation facilities in
the Lansing Metropolitan Area also help to strengthen this potential.
Having analyzed the general structure of the Tri-County regional economy
and having evaluated those special features of the Tri-County Region
which have a bearing on potential industrial, warehousing and distribution development, we now turn to a consideration of Tri-County regional
manufacturing and wholesaling employment trends. Table 1-2 indicates
that manufacturing and wholesale employment trends show small, but significant, gains in manufacturing and wholesale employment between the years
1965 and 1978. Despite these gains, the tables show that manufacturing
and wholesale employment has lagged behind total non-farm employment.
Manufacturing and wholesale employment grew by 11 and 33 percent, respectively, between the years 1965 and 1978. At the same time government and retail employment increased 146 and 70 percent, respectively .
Evaluation of the foregoing trends in manufacturing and wholesale employment must be tempered with the realization that the time period during
which they developed saF a national shift in employment away from manufacturing towards retail trade. Furthermore, during the same time period,
local developments included significant expansion in the operations of
both Michigan State University and state government. In view of these
facts, Tri-County manufacturing and wholesale employment trends should
be read for their absolute growth. The fact that manufacturing and
wholesale employment failed to gain as a proportion of total employment
should not be taken as an indication that these two sectors of the
Lansing economy are without vitality . Indeed, the future portends slow

56

I

�-,

•

I

but steady growth in both of these areas.
Projection of Manufacturing
and Wholesale Employment
Table 1-3 presents projected manufacturing and wholesale employment projections for the Tri-County Region developed by the Tri-County Regional
Planning Commission. This projection is based upon expected changes in
the structure of the national economy and on past and proposed trends in
Tri-County economic development.
The projected Tri-County employment shown in Table 1-3 was developed during 1977 by the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission. The entire region was divided into 465 traffic zones. Using statewide growth projections, the Tri-County allocation of state growth, and knowledge of local
land development trends, land use assignments were made within each traffic zone. Employment, a key factor in traffic generation, was also developed for each traffic zone based on TCRPC employment projections and
assignments to each zone.
Regional employment and economic development trends do not provide sufficient detail for proper analysis of economic change within Delta Township. Using the traffic zone socio-economic data, traffic zones 91, 92,
93 and 94 represent the geographic area of Delta Township's Industrial
Tract, previously discussed. Table 1-4 presents the summary of these
four traffic zones as to projected manufacturing and wholesale employment which may be expected by 1985 and the year 2000.
TABLE 1-2
TRI-COUNTY REGION EMPLOYMENT CHANGES

1965-1978
1965

1974

1978

1965-1978
Percent Change

Manufacturing Employment

40,941

33,383

41,400

1.1

Retail Employment

16,192

24, 1 77

29,000

79 .1

Government Employment

27,653

49,550

68,100

146. 3

Other*

34,376

40,849

45,800

33.3

119. 162

147,959

184,300

54.6

TOTAL
Sources:

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission
Michigan Employment Security Commission

1cWholesale

employment estimated at 15% of the "other employment" category
based on projections by TCRPC and Robert Gladstone Associates.

r

57

�TABLE I-3
PROJECTIONS OF MANUFACTURING AND WHOLESALE EMPLOYMENT
IN THE TRI-COUNTY AREA

Manufacturing
Wholesale
Source:

1978

1985

2000

1978-2000
Percent Change

41,400

39,872

43,510

5.0

6,800

7,300

9,700

42.6

Final 1985 and 2000 Traffic Zone Socio-Economic Data, TCRPC,
1977

TABLE I-4
PROJECTIONS OF MANUFACTURING AND WHOLESALE
EMPLOYMENT IN THE DELTA INDUSTRIAL TRACT
1974-2000
Percent Change

19 74

1985

2000

Manufacturing

758

1,865

2,865

277. 9

Wholesale

105

252

549

422.8

Source:

1985 and 2000 Traffic Zone Socio-Economic Data (1977),
Tri-County Regional Planning Commission
Delta Township Planning Department

Since raw projection of employment provides no indication of future land
consumption, it was deemed necessary to determine average employment density for manufacturing and wholesale activities, then compute raw land
requirements by dividing projected employment by employment density,
thereby obtaining a rough notion of land consumption. Table I-5 presents the results of this calculation.
Table I-5 indicates some 200 acres of new land will be needed for industrial-wholesale enterprises in the 1981-2000 period. When compared with
1972-1977 economic expansion in the industrial tract, approximately 120
acres per year, the forecast seems highly conservative. However, 1972
through 1977 was an extraordinary period of economic expansion due primarily to the advent of the Meijer Distribution Center and the General
Motors Parts Warehouse expansion. Absent these two enterprises, the
rate of economic expansion whould have been significantly lower.

58

�-,

•

TABLE I-5
PROJECTED LAND CONSUMPTION FOR MANUFACTURING AND
WHOLESALE ACTIVITIES IN THE DELTA INDUSTRIAL TRACT
Employees
Per Acre

Employment
Change

Additional
Acres

1974-1985
Manufacturing

15

958

63

Wholesale

10

147

15

1986-2000
Manufacturing
Wholesale

13

1,149

88

9

297

33

Competitiv2 Position of Delta Township in
Attracting Industry Within the Tri-County Region
The industrial tract of Delta Township contains approximately 1100 acres
of vacant, not yet committed, land. When compared to the estimated 200
acres of land needed for manufacturing-wholesale uses by the year 2000,
this amount of land appears to be an excessive reserve, even perhaps
speculative. However, several factors suggest the current boundaries of
the industrial tract, as depicted in Figure I-I, should be retained;
they are:
1.

The strong influx of new industry during the past decade
suggests the industrial tract is favorably located for
transportation-distribution dependent industry.

2.

The present limits of the industrial tract form a logical
transition between industry and other land uses.

3.

The industrial tract provides an area with land reserves
sufficient to accommodate post-2000 economic expansion.

4.

The Township has maintained a consistent pro-economic
expansion philosophy, evidenced by sizable investments
for utilities and roads in the industrial tract and
creation of the Delta Township Economic Development
Corporation. Continued promotion of economic growth
by Township officials could result in increased land consumption for industrial uses.

5.

Industrial firms have recently sought to purchase tracts
larger than their immediate needs would dictate to accommodate future conditions and to ensure a measure of privacy
since many manufacturing concerns have been the object of
nuisance claims due t o noise, smoke, dust, vibration and
the like.

59

�III

Conclusions
1.

The Delta Township Comprehensive Plan, 1973 Edition, recommended reservation of some 2100 acres of land for present
and future industrial and related uses.
The Delta Industrial Tract has evolved consistently with this recommendation.
Although designation of this amount of land for future development exceeds the projected potential requirements of
200 industrial acres, it is believed that the Township
should provide for industrial expansion which may occur
beyond the twenty-year projection period of the Plan.
Also, the future location of a limited number of very large
industries within Delta Township could measurably increase
the amount of new industrial development in the Township and
thereby increase the amount of land required.

2.

Delta Township should continue with planning and construction of utilities, roads and essential services within the
industrial tract, thus maintaining its advantages in the
Lansing Metropolitan area as to providing services.

3.

Delta Township should receive a significant proportion of
the new economic expansion occurring within the Tri-County
Region to the year 2000.
Favorable location, accessibility,
sound utility system, comparable tax rates and incentives
now offered via tax abatement and public financing all contribute to this conclusion.

4.

Township officials should carefully monitor new enterprises
to ensure compatibility with existing industrial activity,
adequacy of utilities, proper fire protection and that needed
private services are maintained.
Such private services
should include retail and personal services conveniently
located near the industrial tract to serve the large number of employees projected.
Fast-food, drive-in bankin8,
personal services and certain professional services are
typically found on the fringe of major employment areas.

60

��OFFICE SPACE ANALYSIS
Delta Township's competitive position with regard to the development of
quality office space is favorable. The linkage afforded by I-496 to
downtown Lansing and other activity centers enhances the office potential
of lands accessible to I-496 such as those located at the interchange of
Creyts Road and I-496 or Saginaw Highway and I-96.
This section examines demand factors and market influences instrumental
in the formation of the market for office space in Delta Township. The
analysis begins with a discussion of the current office types and tenant
characteristics of those firms located in Delta Township. This is followed by an examination of the local factors which influence the existing
office market. The analysis concludes with office space demand projections for Delta Township to the year 2000.
I

Office Types in Delta Township
Office space is separated into three types for analysis, as follows: 1
1.

General Purpose:
Buildings where no one tenant occupies more than 80 percent of
the rentable area. The Verndale Office Building on West St.
Joe Highway is an example of a general purpose office building.

2.

Single Purpose:
Buildings in which one tenant occupies more than 80 percent of
the rentable area. Michigan Farm Bureau and the Auto-Owners
Insurance Buildings typify single purpose office buildings.

3.

Medical-Dental
Buildings occupied by doctors and dentists, and associated labratory facilities. The West St. Joe Professional Building is an
example of this t ype of office use.

No significance can be attributed to the various office types or classifications in terms of land use, traffic impact or compatibility with
adjoining uses of land. However, these classifications are relevant
when projecting future floor space demands.
II

Office Development Trends
In 1978 the Delta Township Planning Department conducted a survey of office space within the Lansing Metropolitan Area. It was determined
that of the 2.1 million square feet of office space which existed in
the area in 1977, 29 percent was constructed during the 1971-1977
period. The predominate type of office space was general purpose
(57%) with single purpose office uses occupying 34 percent of the

-

loffice space integral with industrial facilities is not included in
this analysis.

61

�space and medical/dental uses utilizing nine percent of the office space.
Table 0-1 presents the distribution of office space in the Lansing Metropolitan Area as of 1977. The data indicates that as of 1977, 62 percent
of the existing office space was located within the City of Lansing. The
table excludes state owned office buildings.

./

TABLE 0-1

I

DISTRIBUTION OF OFFICE BUILDINGS - 1977&gt;~

I

LANSING HETROPOLITAN AREA
Gross Floor Area - Square Feet
General
Purpose

Single
Purpose

MedicalDental

Total
Square Feet

Percent
of Total

1,020,558

246,182

82,020

1,348,760

62.0

114,052

34,144

39,140

187,336

8.6

Delta Township

59,220

328,962

17,938

406,120

18.7

Lansing Township

35,666

22,144

23,464

81,274

3.7

Meridian Township

94,300

31,574

24,400

150,274

7.0

1,323,796

663,006

186,962

2,173,764

100.0

City of Lansing
,I

City of East
Lansing

TOTAL
Source:

Delta Township Planning Department using municipal building permit
data.

*Excluded from this survey data is office space located in residences, rer.iocl~led res idences , office space located in lofts, commercial-retail centers
and the like and government owned office space.
Table 0-2 depicts office space construction for the period 1971-1977 in
the Metropolitan Area. While maintaining a dominant position as to the
total amount of existing office floor space, the City of Lansing accounted
for 33 percent of the office space constructed during the 1971-1977 period.
Delta and Meridian Townships have added 36 percent and 15 percent respectively during the aforementioned period. The obvious trend toward suburban
locations for new offices can be attributed to several factors including
the availability of land, site access and population shifts within the
Lansing Metropolitan Area.
Table 0-3 indicates that 602,000 square feet of office space was constructed
in Delta Township in the 1966-1980 period. The construction of these office
buildings resulted in the development of 90 acres of land. It should be
noted that 98 percent of the office space in the Township as of 1980 was
constructed in the aforementioned fifteen year period. As of 1980, 71

62

�percent of the Township's office floor space was devoted to single purpose
uses, 24 percent to general purpose uses, and five percent to medical/
dental uses.
TABLE 0-2
OFFICE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
1971-1977
General
Purpose

Single
Purpose

Medical
Dental

Total
Square Feet

Percent
of Total

155,988

92,182

6,620

254,740

32.9

City of East
Lansing

34,057

34,144

4,140

72,341

9.5

Delta Township

50,220

209,962

13,938

274,120

35.5

Lansing Township

35,666

6, 14Lf

15,264

57,074

7.3

Meridian Township

94,300

19,570

113,870

14.8

370,231

362,002

772,195

100.0

City of Lansing

39,962

TABLE 0-3
ACREAGE AND FLOOR SPACE DEVOTED TO OFFICE USES
DELTA TOWNSHIP
1966-1980

Year

Square
Footage

1976-1980

1971-1975

1966-19 70
Acreage

1966

Year

Square
Footage

Acreage

Year

Square
Footage

Acreage

1971

86,100

17.15

1976

176,800

30.00

20,200

4.11

1967

21,800

1. 32

1972

10,600

.92

1977

1968

23,700

2. 17

1973

100,900

12.27

1978

1969

2,900

.33

1974

5,800

.36

1979

75,400

7.94

1970

15,300

2.54

1975

13,100

1. 30

1980

49,700

10.55

63,700

6.36

216,500

32.50

322,100

52.60

63

�III

Determination of Delta Township Office Space Market
Prior office space construction activity both in terms of gross space and
the location are important keys to determining likely future construction
activity. Data as to existing gross floor area in the Metropolitan area
together with construction activity since 1971 has been set forth herein.
Projecting office space construction, and accompanying land requirements
is generally determined by one of two methods, they are (1) historical
averaging and obsolescence allowance and (2) projection of office space
using occupations.
For purposes of this analysis the historical averaging and obsolescence
allowance method is used. Utilizing the information contained in Table
0-3, it was determined that, in an average year during the 1966-1980
period, approximately six acres were converted to office land uses and
40,000 square feet of office floor space was constructed. Three large
office land developments, being the Auto-Owners Insurance Headquarters
(172,000 sq. ft.), the conversion of the O'Rafferty High School to the
Michigan National Bank Operations Center (101,000 sq. ft.) and the Farm
Bureau Insurance Headquarters (76,000 sq. ft.) accounted for 58 percent of
the office space constructed in this period.
TABLE 0-4
PROJECTED OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT
AND PROJECTED OFFICE FLOOR SPACE REQUIREMENTS
DELTA TOWNSHIP
1981-2000

\
to
1985

1981
to
1990

1981
to
1995

38 acres

75 acres

113 acres

150 acres

200,000
Sq. Ft.

400,000
Sq . Ft.

600,000
Sq. Ft.

800,000
Sq. Ft.

1981

I
\

I
\

.
.

I

Projected Land
Area Required
For Office Uses
Projected Office
Floor Space Requirements

I
Source:

19 81
to
2000

Delta Township Planning Department (1981)

Table 0-4 contains projected office land consumpti on requirements an d projected office floor area requirements within Delta Township for the 19812000 period. Based on building activity in the Township in the 19661980 period, it has been estimated that 7½ acres per year should be reserved for office uses to the year 2000. The r e commended reservation
of 7.5 acres per year includes a 25 percent increase in the annual six

64

n

hr:-----==- - - -

�acres office land consumption figure in order to provide for flexibility
in choice. The recommended land reservation requirements are based on
the following assumptions:
1.

The demand for office space in Delta Township in the 1981-2000
period will be similar to the demand experienced in the 19661980 period.

2.

The Township will continue to be an attractive area for office
land uses.

3.

During the 1981-2000 period 90 percent of the office space constructed prior to 1931 will become obsolete and will be vacated
in favor of newer buildings.

4.

The projected development of 7½ acres of office land per year is
based on contemporary floor area to site area ratios and existing
parking and landscaping requirements.

In summary, it is recommended that office use areas be utilized as transition zones between residential and non-residential areas. Modern office
developments are generally attractive in design, site landscaping and
normally have daytime activities, and thereby are less deliterious to the
peace and quiet of residental areas than are other non-residential uses.

65

��TRANSPORTATION

The objective of the transportation network is to provide essential
service in moving vehicles throughout the Township, provide convenient
access to private property and allow efficient work, shopping and leisure time vehicle trips. The street network is the most sophisticated
and developed element of the transportation system. Other elements include the public bus system, operated by the Capital Area Transportation
Authority (CATA), non-motorized facilities including sidewalks and bikeways, and airport and rail services, including passenger and freight
cartage.
The transportation plan element of the Comprehensive Plan provides an
analysis of each facet of the transportation system giving recognition
to fuel costs, increased government emphasis on public transit service
and non-motorized facilities.
I

Historical Development of the Street System
The existing thoroughfare pattern of Delta Township has evolved primarily
from two basic highway development factors.
First, the mile road grid
pattern evident in the Township reflects development along section lines
which date back to the nineteenth century survey of the Northwest Territory.
This policy of providing access routes along section lines has
at times produced seemingly arbitrary road alignment patterns with respect to natural features. However, construction of section line roads
has also provided reasonably good access to all points within the State.
The second basic highway development factor which had a great impact on
the thoroughfare pattern of the Township is the Federal Interstate and
Defense Highway Program. The program is aimed at developing high speed
efficient transportation links between major centers of economic importance throughout the country. In Delta Township, two existing interstate highways and a proposed third interstate highway impose a strong
new pattern over the old grid configuration. A north-south segment of
Interstate 96 divides the Township into east and west halves.
Interstate 496 divides the eastern half of the Township into northeast and
southeast quadrants; the proposed Interstate 69 will divide the western half of the Township approximately into northwest and southwest
quadrants.
These existing and proposed interstate highways provide
efficient connections to downtown Lansing as well as to other major
economic centers of the state and nation.

II

Functional Classification of the Existing Street System
Classification of streets in an urban area is intended to identify each
street according to its service function.
Such classification establishes the relationship of each street to the entire system servicing
the urban area.
Functions are identified with respect to the types of land use served
and the magnitude of their traffic generation, and also according to
the mix of "through" and "local" traffic on the various segments of the
network. Through traffic refers to trips which begin and end outside

66

�of the immediate study area. Most of the trips on I-96, for example,
are likely to have their point of origin and destination at places
remote from Delta Township. The interstate highway network and major
U.S. and state routes make up the principal arterial network of roads.
A large portion of trips on a residential street are likely to be comprised of traffic with both origin or destination in the immediate vicinity. These streets are therefore designated as local streets in
the functional system. Local streets provide the motorist with access
to abutting land, whereas, arterial highways facilitate movements
through an area. Figure T-I presents a classification of Delta Township's streets and roads by the Michigan Department of Transportation
(MDOT) in 1979. A description of the various classifications follows
in Table T-1.
The following list illustrates the basic criteria which are generally
considered when classifying urban streets.
1.
2.
3.

4.
5.
6.

The origin and destination of trips served
(intra-urban, inter-urban and rural-urban).
The volume of trips served.
The type of land uses served.
Spacing between travel corridors.
Route continuity.
Physical characteristics such as parking,
the number of access points, etc.

The classification of streets and highways in an area such as Delta
Township which is rapidly urbanizing is often complicated because
land use patterns are not yet established, travel volumes are light
and the existing physical condition of a roadway may discourage its
use as classified. It should be noted that road classifications
often change in jurisdictions which are experiencing significant
growth due to increases in traffic volumes, physical roadway improvements and changes in land uses.
There are approximately 160 total miles of roadways in Delta Township
including expressways, section line roads and local subdivision streets
and roads. Road rights-of-way, including the interchange rights-ofway, occupy over 2,000 acres or approximately nine percent of the
Township's total land area. Table T-2 depicts the total mileage of the
various roadway classifications in Delta Township.

67

�_...,,,,,,,..,.~·

._,p•""·~·"",t,••'~

DELTA

~,,,,....,...~

TOWNSHIP

Figure T·I

__.11 11111111111 '~ 111111111

MICHIGAN DEPARTMEN
OF TRANSPORTATION
FUNCTIONAL HIGHWAY
C L ASS I F I CAT I ON

~

STATEWIDE ARTERIAL

&gt;-rj

I-'•

~

(JQ

C

REGIONAL

ARTERIAL

l"i
(l)

_... METRO·AREA ARTERIAL

1-3
I
H

~ t8
"O

•~

~~t~.f~~}
k~
I
.
~
~
~ 1!L~
.•.
.. "''I"'!::""

I

0-0::,

I'--

!&gt;'

~

-

!§ii,,,..,_..

¾

t

..,,,-

VI('

-1.t".I· ""'

0i:Sl

LOCAL

1111111

PRINCIPLE COLLECTOR

••• SECONDARY COLLECTOR
--

'b

F

-I

I

--

www

URBAN BOUNDARY AREA

/
/

,,,,.,, , , . . -

,,/,,::,,,,,,.,,
~,, ,,,,,
/

✓ --1·

/

____ ., ., ,. , ,., , .

--- -----✓ /

I

/

ARTERIAL

.,,.

/

/
/

/

CITY OF
LANSING

NORTH

~

�TABLE T-1
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF HIGHWAYS
METROPOLITAN AREAS
TYPICAL
TRIP
LENGTH
(mil_es)

DESIRABLE
OPERATING
SPEEDS

PRIMARY SERVICE FUNCTION

ACCESS
CONTROL

Statewide Arterials

Through traffic

Full or none

45-55

4-20

Regional Arterials

Through traffic, limited land service

Usually none

30-45

10 or less

Metro-Area Arterials

Intra-area traffic, connect other
arterials, moderate level of land
service

Usually none

30-45

10 or less

Lesser arterial service at local level,
more emphasis on land access

None

30-45

10 or less

Principal Collectors

Connect local systems to arterials

None

25-40

2 or less

Secondary Collectors

Connect local systems to arterials
and other collectors

None

25-35

1 or less

Residential

Access to residences

None

20-25

½ or less

Local Access

Land service, local access

None

20-25

½ or less

Industrial-Commercial

Service to industrial and commercial
land areas

None

20-30

1 or less

MDOT
CLASSIFICATION

{mph)

Arterial System

°'
'°

Local Arterials

Collector System

Local Road and
Street System

)

)

~

I

�TABLE T-2
DELTA TOWNSHIP ROAD MILEAGE BY FUNCTIONAL
CLASSIFICATION*
Classification

Mileage

Arterial System
Statewide Arterial

13 miles

Regional Arterial

6 miles

Metro-Area Arterial

6 miles

Local Arterials

12 miles

Collector System
Principal Collectors

23 miles

Secondary Collectors

1 mile

Local Streets
Residen t ial

99 miles

Local Access

0 miles

Industrial - Commercial

0 miles
Total

*As classified by MDOT

70

160 miles

�The two primary factors having an impact on the design and function of a
roadway are traffic volumes and character or composition of traffic.
Socio-economic factors which influence decisions as to road network design
and function are numerous. They include safety, energy conservation, aesthetics, etc. Physical characteristics of a roadway, which influence traffic
volumes and composition, are analyzed in Table T-3.
TABLE T-3
PLANNING IMPACTS ON ROADWAYS
Significance to Roadway Planning

Physical Characteristic
Right-of-way:

1. Affects possibility of additional roadway
lanes.
2. Impacts cost of roadway expansion.
3. Affects future land uses on vacant land.

Roadway Surfacing:

1. Inadequate roadway surfacing can result
in transfer of vehicle trips to other
roadways.
2. The type of surfacing determines the longevity of the roadway and the applicable
truck operation classification.
3. Lack of hard surface can inhibit
urbanization.

Number of Lanes:

1. Affects traffic carrying capacity.
2. Influences future land uses on vacant
land.
3. Affects motor vehicle operating speeds.
4. Impacts motor vehicle accident rate.
5. Affects availability of mass transit
services.

Topography:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Subsurface Conditions:

1. Important determinant in locating streets.
2. Can negate possibility of depressed roadways and necessitate elevated structures.

Man-made Features:
(signs, adjacent
construction, etc.)

1. Affects traffic speeds, turning movements,
spacing of intersections, parking, pedestri.an and mass transit service, traffic
signalization and capacity of roadway.

Roadway Shoulders:

1. Serves as a storage space for disabled
vehicles.
2. Provides a recovery area for out of control vehicles.

Determines road gradients.
Affects alignment.
Impacts road cross section.
Affects sight distances,
Impacts traffic carrying capacity of
roadway.
6. Affects motor vehicle operating speeds.

71

�There are a number of factors which are unique to Delta Township which
have to be considered when planning for future roadways. The following list cites examples of such factors:
TABLE T-4
UNIQUE DELTA TOWNSHIP FEATURES
Results

Condition

III

Relatively flat topography:

1.
2.
3.
4.

Reduces road grad i ents.
Facilitates location of roads.
Insures better sight distances.
Aids in cost reduction.

Existence of the Grand River:

1. Limits the number of possible
north-south road corridors.
2. Required bridges increase costs.
3. Hampers road continuity.

Suburban location of the
Township:

1. Significant volumes of commuter
traffic generated.
2. A very auto-oriented populace.
3. Significant volumes of through
traffic are encountered.

Existence of Regional
Shopping Centers:

1. Generates significant amounts of
non-local traffic .

Truck Operation Classifications
Figure T-II illustrates truck operation classifications for Delta Township
roadways. Roadways which are designated as State Highways or County All
Season routes are constructed and maintained to a standard which allows
the roadway to carry maximun per axle loads during all weather conditions.
Class B routes have more stringent weight restrictions than Class A routes.
The need for all-season roadways is most important within the Delta Township industrial tract.

IV

Jurisdiction Over Delta Township Roads
Responsibility for the construction and maintenance of streets and roads
in the State of Michigan lies with one of three governmental units. The
MDOT is responsible for the construction and maintenance of all state
trunk lines. In incorporated areas, municipal governments are responsible for the construction and maintenance of all streets that are
not part of the state trunkline system. Finally, in unincorporated
areas responsibility for the construction and maintenance of roads not
part of the trunkline system lies with the various county road commissions.
Since Delta Township is an unincorporated portion of Eaton County, responsibility for construction and maintenance of Delta Township streets and
roads lies with the Eaton County Road Commission and, in the case of
state trunk lines, with the MDOT.

72

�7

I I
I I

: I
I

I

I I
I

I

I
I

'

' '

I

II

-..

I

'\

'

'

\

' '

''

\ \ \

''

\
\

''''

' '\
\

\I
I

'

\

\

I

I

~

1/.

("')-1

rn0
..

L

I I

~

C')

(')

:lJ C')

CJ)

0

0

00

C:

C:

)&gt;C:

)&gt;

-I

-I

-I

z

-&lt;

Figure T-II

.:a

z

-&lt;

~
cz

-I

m

-&lt;

:::c

)&gt;
i"
i"

C)

l&gt;m

)&gt;

(')
i"
)&gt;

CJ)
CJ)

CJ)

CJ)

CJ)

m

)&gt;

:lJ

:lJ

0

0

)&gt;

)&gt;

•

C

Page 73

cnn

~"
:!!o

C')
i"
)&gt;

a:,

)&gt;C:

)&gt;
CJ)

0

z

CJ)

-I

:::c

~

-&lt;

("') "tJ

-1::a
-)&gt;

0-t
z0

z

"T1

cc
C

""'I

(D

C

m

r-

-I
)&gt;

-I

--

-I

0

:ez
CJ)

:::c
'tJ

�V Financing of Road Improvements
While the responsibility for construction and maintenance of Delta Township streets and roads lies with the MDOT and Eaton County Road Commission, financing for such construction and maintenance may come from the
State of Michigan, Eaton County or Delta Township itself. The MDOT distributes Federal Highway Funds as well as gas and weight tax collections
from Michigan's Motor Vehicle Fund to the various county and municipal
road commissions. Delta Township may transfer funds to the Eaton County
Road Commission for the purpose of constructing or maintaining county
roads within the Township or to the Department of Transportation for
the purpose of constructing and maintaining state trunk lines within
the Township.
Act 51 of the Public Acts of 1951, as amended, establishes the mechanisms
for financing streets and roads in the state. The basis for financing
Michigan streets and roads is their classification as state trunk lines,
county primary roads, city major streets, county local or city local
streets. Figure T-III illustrates state trunk lines, county primary
roads and local roads.
VI

State Trunk Lines
Act 51 of the Public Acts of 1951, as amended, charges the MDOT with responsibility for delineating a system of state trunk lines, all portions
of which are to be roads of major statewide importance. Because of their
statewide importance, the responsibility for constructing and maintaining
state trunk lines lies solely with the MDOT. However, Public Act 51 makes
provisions for local participation in the financing of state highways under
two specific conditions. First, local governments may finance enlargements
for state trunk lines designed specifically to carry additional local traffic rather than through traffic. Secondly, local governments may contractually participate in the financing of state trunk lines in order to expedite improvements desired locally.

VII

County Primaries and Locals
Act 51 of the Public Acts of 1951, as amended, charges the various county
road commissions with the responsibility for classifying county primary
and county local roads. The classifications developed by the various
counties are subject to the approval of the MDOT. Public Act 51 specifies that county primary roads are to be those roads of "the greatest
general importance." Determination of which roads are of the greatest
general importance is based upon traffic volumes, primary generators
of traffic served, and other important producers or attractors of motor
vehicle trips such as industrial development or natural resources. The
determination of a county primary system is an important task for the
county road commission and the MDOT because county primary roads are
financed from earmarked portions of the Motor Vehicle Fund. Threefourths of the 34 percent of the total of the Motor Vehicle Fund
allocated to counties is specifically set aside for financing the
county primary road system.
Two county roads are located in Delta Township which are under the
jurisdiction of agencies other than the Eaton County Road Commission.

74

�7

=
I

=

=

\

I

I I

) I
I

I

I I
I

I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

"\

I \

I
II

I

\
'

'\

I

0

....

-&lt;

..,

0

Ill

II

"'O.,, :IJ

c:oo
-

lz

'ti

:a

-s::

0
:x,
--;

:c

)&gt;

:a

-&lt;

-4

O::!\.,
cnz,

-4

cnzcn

(/)

-4

)&gt;

m
:a

:a

C:

)&gt;

;,:;

0

C

z

r-

z

m

Figure T-III

Page 75

:IJ:IJ)&gt;
"'O C

ml&gt;)&gt;

"T1

C

C

m
r-

(D

)&gt;

(0

...

~

~
~

--

0

G')-

en

Ocn
Z-n
("')
)&gt;

-

-I
0

z

:ez

-.,,

:::c

�Eaton Highway is a county local road under the jurisdiction of the
Clinton County Road Commission. Waverly Road is a county primary
which is under the jurisdiction of the Ingham County Road Commission from North Grand River Avenue to just south of Lansing Road
where the Grand River crosses Waverly Road. The City of Lansing
has jurisdiction over Waverly Road from the Grand River south to
Jolly Road.
VIII

Financing Prerogatives
As previously noted, Delta Township is empowered to contract with
the MDOT for the construction and maintenance of state trunk lines
and with the Eaton County Road Commission for the construction and
maintenance of county roads. Delta Township may meet the obligations assumed under contracts with the MDOT or the Eaton County
Road Commission with funds derived from three sources. First, the
Township Board may levy a general millage tax or a special assessment for the purpose of road construction and maintenance. A three
mill general millage tax may be initially levied by the Township
Board on its own initiative while an additional three mill tax may be
levied with referendum approval. The Township Board may issue road
construction bonds for road improvements. These bonds must be retired by either general taxation or special assessments.

IX

Thoroughfare Cross Sections
Figures T-IV through T-VIII illustrate thoroughfare cross sections for
the various roadway classifications within Delta Township. Adherence
to the cross sections recommended herein will benefit the Township in
the following ways:
1.

Will assist in insuring that adequate right-of-way
exists for additional traffic lanes, turning lanes,
acceleration and deceleration lanes, storm drainage and sidewalks.

2.

Will help to assure compatibility between the proposed thoroughfare and existing or proposed land
uses by utilizing natural vegetation strips and
preserving the natural grades.

3.

Will maintain the traffic carrying capacity of
roadways via minimization of curb cuts, the
provision of adequate pavement width and the
installation of adequately sized road shoulders.

X Right-of--Way Deficiencies
I1inimum right-of-way requirements are illustrated in the thoroughfare
cross sections. Based on these standards, any classified street with
less right-of-way than that which is recommended is considered inadequate. Figure T-IX identifies roadways which in 1981 had inadequate
rights-of-way.
Based on the aforementioned standards, many streets in Delta Township
have inadequate rights-of-way. The impact of a right-of--way deficiency

76

�7
=

will vary between roadways. Right-of-way deficiencies can result in
high accident rates, transportation-land use conflicts and lower than
desirable levels of service. The extent to which these problems will
occur is dependent upon the types of land use in the vicinity, the
number of traffic lanes and the volume of traffic on the roadway.
It is very difficult to obtain adequate rights-of-way in the urbanized
areas of Delta Township. However, in vacant areas which are subject
to development pressures the ability e xists to protect the needed rightof-way. The Delta Township Board of Trustees, Planning Commission and
staff should be cognizant of the right-of-way deficiencies illustrated
in Figure T-IX and attempt to secure the needed right-of-way when reviewing site plans, proposed transportation projects or any other
development proposals. This will help insure that the future land use
activities will be properly integrated with the transportation network
required to serve them.

77

�FIGURE T-IV

EXPRESSWAY CROSS-SECTION

POSSIBLE
LANDSCAPED

PRESERVATION
OF
NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY

BUFFER
1

2 AT 24 RURAL

!PAVEMENT W I D T H ~

I

r

,I

2 AT 24°-36° URBAN

t-

70°-94 RURAL

MEDIAN WIDTH
1

I.

I

j

1

26 -50 URBAN

1

1

- - - - - - - - - - - 3~0 -400 R U R A L - - - - - - - - - -

RI GH
T OF
WAY
1
1

- - - - - - - - - 320 -350 UR B A N - - - - - - - - ~

78

�7

FIGURE

T-V

CROSS-SECTION
ARTERIAL

ROAD WITH

1

I

OF
BOULEVARD

1

0 -94 RURA~
MEDIAN
WIDTH
1

60 -84' URBAN

1

I f - - - - - - - - - - 250 R U R A L - - - - - - - - - - - - " '

RIGHT OF WAY
1
1
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 200 -350 URBAN - - - - - - - - - - - " '
Ill~

A
79

J

�FIGURE T-VI
CROSS-SECTION OF
TWO WAY ARTERIAL STREET

1

24'-60 RURAL
1,,

r

PAVEMENT _'1
WIDTH 7
1

1

48 -60 URBAN

1'

SIDEWALK

t

I

t.

SIDEWALK

URBAN a RURAL 1
IL~d-100'
RIGHT OF WAY

80

�-7
=

=

FIGURE T- VII

CROSS-SECTION OF
COLLECTOR STREET

1

1

22 ·24 RURAL
!L_PAVEMENT~
~

WIDTH

/J

28-60 URBAN

I

OP'T,
P'KI.

I

I

l.

I,;

r

1

1

2 6 - 100 RURAL a URBAN
RIGHT OF WAY

7

81

_J

�FIGURE T-VIII

CROSS-SECTION OF
LOCAL

1

STREET

1

20 -28 RURAL
~PAVEMENT -J
WI 0TH ----;,i
1

1

26 -34 URBAN

OPT.

l'KG.

I

I

OPT.

PKe.

js.w.l

C.
1

66 RURAL
~11-----

a

URBAN

RIGHT OF WAY - - - ~

82

�7

I I
I I

: I

''

I I

''II

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

II

I

''

\
'

' \

'

' '- '

I
I

"' ' '

'' ''
' '' ' '
' ' ''
' ' I'' \

'\ \ '
I \
I

\

I
I

c:x,

mo
'Tl)&gt;

lz

:x, :x,

-o
C) J&gt;

0

:0

--&lt;

:cc

:i:

-f

QC

'Tim
'Tl

:eJ&gt;~
-&lt;m
z

-f

z
Figure T-IX

Page 83

0C

-m:xJ

-·"T1

(C

...

C

CD

z-

-t

_ :::c
m-1

&gt;&lt;

OG)

(/)0
'Tl

~

)&gt;

-&lt;

0

m

r

-t
)&gt;

-t

0
~

z
(J)

-.,,
::i::

/\
~

I

�XI

Mass Transit Service in Delta Township
Transit service in the Lansing area evolved in a manner similar to that
of other systems across the country. An electric inter-urban railroad
and local streetcar system served Lansing and surrounding areas until
1932 when they were replaced by a more flexible and inexpensive motor
bus system. Up to 1964 transit service in the area was provided by
private companies. In 1964 the City of Lansing increased its involvement in the operation of the Metropolitan bus system with the City assuming complete management and operation of the system in 1970. In January
of 1972, the Capital Area Transportation Authority (CATA) was formed under Act 55 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1963, through a petition by
the City of Lansing. However, Delta Township never off i cially joined
CATA.
During the decade of the 1970's the CATA system continually experienced
increases in ridership. Table T-5 illustrates CATA ridership figures
for the past nine years.
TABLE T-5
CATA RIDERSHIP
Year

Ridership

1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972

4,635,248 (estimated)
3,850,000 (estimated)
3,674,424
3,140,549
2,330,653
1,835,948
1,267,578
864,214
732,609

In the late 1970's Delta Township annually provided CATA with financial
subsidies for transit service provided within the Township. In 1981
this method of funding transit service was altered when a service contract between CATA and Delta Township was cooperatively drafted and executed. The contract, drafted for a one-year period, specifies the amount
of service to be provided and the corresponding payments.
Route Number Six of the CATA system presently traverses the Township along
Waverly Road and West Saginaw Highway. This route has one hour intervals
between buses (headways). A total of fifteen bus trips a day are made
into the Township beginning at 6:40 a.m. and ending at 9:15 p.m. Transit
service is not provided to the Township on Saturdays or Sundays.
In 1981 voters residing within governmental units which are members of
CATA, being the cities of Lansing and East Lansing and Meridian, Delhi
and Lansing Townships, approved a millage issue which provided operating
funds for CATA for a two-year period. Since Delta Township is not a member of CATA, its residents are not affected by the transit millage.

84

�In 1981 Delta Township joined the Eaton County Transportation Authority
(Eatran). Headquartered in Charlotte, this agency provides transit
service on a demand-response basis utilizing small, sixteen passenger
buses. Eatran is funded 100 percent by the federal government until
September 30, 1982, funded 75 percent by the federal government from
October 1, 1982, to September 20, 1983, and funded 50 percent by the
federal government after October 1, 1983. Eatran service is limited
to Eaton County. At the present time, a significant amount of
Eatran's service miles are recorded within Delta Township.
The following factors could provide a major stimulus to increasing mass
transit ridership in the Township:
1.

2.

3.

4.
XII

Expansion of mass transit service.
Continued increases in the number of multiple-family
households.
Increased motor vehicle parking costs at Lansing
Metropolitan locations, particularly the central
business district.
Increased costs of motor vehicle ownership and
operation.

Railroad Facilities Serving Delta Township
The Chesapeake and Ohio and the Grand Trunk Western are the two railroad lines with tracks running through Delta Township. The Chesapeake
and Ohio track cuts across the extreme northwest corner of the Township, but does not provide direct service to the Township. Two Grand
Trunk Western tracks cut across the southeast corner of the Township
parallel to U.S. 27. The tracks are part of a main line route serving
Chicago, Port Huron, Toronto and intermediate cities. The Lansing
yard located at Snow Road and Pierson Highway is Grand Truck Western's
headquarters and main marshalling yard in the Lansing Metropolitan
Area.
Grand Trunk Western facilities and services in Delta Township represent
one of the most important transportation assets in the Lansing Metropolitan Area. The Lansing yard consists of 13 switching tracks with
automated controls and is a central assembly and dispatch point for
railroad cars destined for all parts of the country. Grand Trunk
Western serves the following Delta Township industrial type facilities.
Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant
Lansing Board of Water &amp; Light's Erickson Station
Meijers Distribution Center
Millett Elevator Company
Ralston Purina Company
Grand Trunk Western has indicated a willingness to provide additional
spur service to new industries desiring to locate in the Township's
industrial tract. The Grand Trunk Western Railroad tracks carry
approximately 15 trains per day in each direction, making Grand Trmnk
Western the major rail line in the Lansing area. Grand Trunk Western
has eliminated the passenger service it once provided to the Township.

85

J

�Since August of 1975 the Grand Trunk Western has operated an automotive
compourid,kn.uwn as Autoport, which is located on Snow Road adjacent to
the railroad's main line. This facility was designed as an intermodal
distribution center for both American and foreign-made automobiles.
Vehicles are transported by rail from either the assembly plant or the
U.S. port of entry to Autoport and then trucked to dealerships in
Michigan cities and surrounding out-state areas. In the first four
years of operation, over 100,000 vehicles were transported through
this facility.
From a railroad track layout perspective alone, most of Delta Township's
industrial tract could be served by the Grand Trunk. The Grand Trunk
Railroad plans to extend a railroad spur from the existing Meijer lead,
which traverses the middle of Section 26 in a north-south direction,
eastwardly three quarters of a mile to the Autoport facility which is
located in Section 25. The potential also exists to serve the eastern
halves of Sections 27 and 34 off of the Oldsmobile lead.
Future railroad service to Delta Township is difficult to project.
Recent national railroad trends have evidenced the elimination of some
passenger and freight service to various parts of the country. The
most important local trends affecting freight service to Delta Township
will be the pace of development in the Township's industrial triangle
and in other industrial areas servedoy-the Grand Trunk Western line.
Past increases in freight traffic suggest that the future will witness
moderate growth.
XIII
,-..._

Air Service to Delta Township
Capital City Airport is located near the northeast corner of Delta Township, north of Grand River Avenue in Clinton County. The airport provides commercial passenger, freight and general aviation service to the
Lansing Metropolitan area. The 1600 acre airport is served at present
by three major airlines; United, Republic and Piedmont. There are also
two commuter airlines serving the Lansing Metropolitan area; Simmons
and Freedom. These four airlines currently have 30 regularly scheduled
flights per day to such major cities as New York, Chicago, Detroit,
Denver, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Cleveland and Washington, DC. In 1978
United and Republic airline flights into and out of Capital City Airport
carried 448,260 passengers, an increase of 58 percent since 1972.
A total of 163,032 flights occurred at Capital City Airport in 1978.
General aviation activity accounted for 88% of this total or 147,205
flights. Capital City Airport general aviation activity includes business, charter, survey and patrol flights, crop dusting, instructional
and pleasure flying.
Besides the main terminal facility, there are office, industrial, commercial, hangar, maintenance, crash/fire/rescue and classroom buildings
located at Capital City Airport. The airport serves as the air transportation hub for Michigan State government, Michigan State University
and many private businesses in the Lansing area as well as Delta Township

86

�Future
Expansion
The rapidly increased level of aviation activity at Capital City Airport
has necessitated that airport facilities be expanded. Proposed plans
are for expansion to occur in two phases: Phase I, 1975-1986, and
Phase II, 1986-1995. The Phase I program includes the following:
- Acquisition of approximately 1,511 acres to meet the requirements for the proposed expansion. Total airport size will be
2,711 acres after acquisition is completed.
- Extension and strengthening of existing runways.
- Construction of a general aviation runway.
- Associated taxiway development.
- Expansion of the terminal complex and general aviation
facilities to meet 1985 requirements.
Phase II construction would begin as the airport's facilities again
approach saturation. The Phase II development program includes the
following:
- Construction of a new air carrier runway with a full parallel
taxiway and exit taxiway.
- Upgrade a general aviation runway to an air carrier crosswind
runway.
- Construct a new terminal complex and support facilities.
- Construct additional hangar space and supporting apron and
taxiways.
- Construct additional general aviation parking spaces.
- Construct additional local and itinerant tie down aprons.
The proposed expansion of Capital City Airport is not expected to have
any negative impacts on Delta Township. Because of proposed runway
locations aircraft will be flying over less densely populated areas
thereby exposing fewer people to aircraft noise. Residents in the northeast corner of Delta Township will experience a decreasing amount of
aircraft noise exposure as airport expansion plans are implemented. The
proposed airport expansion is not expected to result in an increase in
total airport related emissions above those existing in 1976. Thus, in
the quality of air in the vicinity of the airport is not expected to be
lowered as a result of increased air traffic in the future. It should
be noted that a portion of the northeast section of Delta Township is
within an airport approach clearance zone of the airport. Within this
zone the height of buildings is restricted. This restriction is not
expected to have any adverse impact on Delta Township.

87

/

�XIV

Non Motorized Transportation
The use of bicycles as an altemative means of transportation has risen
dramatically in the 1970's due to the ever-increasing cost of gasoline
and the threat of reduced supplies. Bicycles represent a practical
energy conservation measure while providing door-to-door convenience
and efficiency as a practical mode of transportation, particularly in
urban areas.
As part of a large urban area, Delta Township should provide for the
growing needs of bicycle users in the Township. The Planning and
development of a bicycle path system in Delta Township should be
regionally coordinated in order to create an efficient bicycle route
system throughout the Tri-County area. Engineering standards for
constructing bicycle paths as developed by federal and State Departments of Transportation Officials should be utilized to avoid conflicts
in connecting bicycle paths with adjoining municipalities.
There are baiscally three types of bicyclists. The first group is
children who use the bicycle extensively on low traffic residential
streets. The second group is the average adult rider who usually rides
close to home on local streets and generally is uncomfortable traveling
long distances on heavily traveled streets. The third group is the
experienced bicyclist who travels high volume arterials, generally keeps
up with traffic in urbanized areas at a pace of 10-15 miles per hour and
frequently travels relatively long distances of 10-20 miles.
Each of the aforementioned groups has unique bicycling characteristics
and therefore requires clifferent types of bicycle facilities to satisfy
its needs. Children who commute to schools, parks and playgrounds can
often be served by low volume local streets. Average adult cyclists
generally feel comfortable on low volume streets and frequently prefer
off-road recreational paths. The commuter bicyclist is oriented towards
utilitarian bicycle trips and generally prefers on-road routes which
offer the shortest distance between travel points.
Due to the fact that the majority of bicyclists now utilize the roadway,
with the exception being children who generally use sidewalks, greater
emphasis should be placed on reducing motorist-bicyclist conflicts.
Many Delta Township streets cannot adequately accommodate bicyclists due
to poor vertical and horizontal alignments, narrow traffic lanes, and
inadequate shoulders. This situation is especially critical in the
vicinity of schools.
In planning for non-motorized transportation in the Township, consideration should be given to developing bicycle lanes in conjunction with
new road construction, improvements to existing roads, and the installation of bicycle/equestrian paths along utility easements. Many bike
paths could be developed via these methods without significant additional funding. Bicycle lanes could also be constructed along the
Carrier Creek and Grand River green belts as designated on the Future
Land Use Map. One source of funding for bicycle path construction could
be the Eaton County Road Commission which was authorized in 1979 to
appropriate one percent of its funds for non-motorized transportation
projects by an amendment to the Michigan Motor Vehicle Fund (Act 51 of
the Public Acts of 1951).

88

�7

During 1979-1980 a Bicycle Transportation Plan was prepared by the
Tri-County Regional Planning Commission. This Plan contains regional
bicycling goals and objectives, a description of existing bicycle fa cilities, a review of local bicycle ordinances, and an analysis of education programs and engineering studies. The report also contains an
appraisal of major Delta Township streets which were examined by experienced members of the Tri-County Bicycle Association regarding the
street's suitability for safe bicycling.
A sidewalk network to serve pedestrians should also be considered as
part of a non-motorized transportation plan for the Township. The
existing sidewalk system does not meet the needs of Township residents.
Sidewalks do not exist to serve students commuting to schools forcing
them to use roadways and creating a dangerous situation particularly
for young children. Pedestrian-auto conflicts also occur in commercial
areas due to the lack of sidewalks.
In planning a sidewalk network, emphasis should be on the creation of a
safe means of access for pedstrians to activity centers within the Township such as schools, parks and commercial areas. Priorities for sidewalk construction should be based on pedestrian volume to these activity
centers.
Funding for sidewalk construction is available through such state authorized means as the creation of special assessment districts or the levying
of a special millage.

89

��WATER SERVICE
The previously documented growth which Delta has experienced has resulted
in increased demands for municipal services including the provision of a
public water supply. Because the Township has only provided this service
for the past two decades the water supply system has experienced the
advantages of the improved technology of the past twenty years.
In order to maintain the high quality of the municipal services presently
provided, the Township must continually evaluate the water supply and distribution system in terms of its ability to meet present and future water
supply demands. This chapter describes the existing water system, provides
projected water consumption figures and depicts future water service areas.
I

Historical Information
The existing water supply system was initiated during 1957 with water being
purchased from Lansing Township. Water mains were installed in three
subdivisions; Knolls, Clairborne Heights and Huntington Acres. The Lansing
Board of Water and Light operated the system until the late 1950 1 s when
Delta Township purchased these water lines from the Board of Water and
Light.
In 1963 the Township began to establish its own water supply system.
During this time the 500,000 gallon elevated storage tank on Snow Road was
constructed, 100,000 feet of water mains were installed and water wells
#1 and #2 were installed. These facilities served the area generally
located between Waverly and Elmwood Roads. Major expansions of the system
were initiated in October of 1965 and were completed in the spring of 1966.
Well #3 was added to the system during this time and minor subdivision
extensions, paid for by individual developers,were installed. Well #4 was
constructed in 1968. In September of 1969 the State of Michigan entered
into an agreement with the Township for water service to the State
Secondary Complex located in Windsor Township adjacent to Delta's southern
boundary.
Additional water supply wells have been constructed in order to meet
increasing water consumption demands. Well #5 was put into service during
the summer of 1970, Well 116 in 1973, Well 117 in 1975 and Well :/18 in 1977.
Since 1969, major new additions to the water service area have taken
place. In 1975, Water District 115 provided service west of Creyts Road
along Willow Highway and along Canal Road between Willow and Saginaw
Highway. In 1978-1979 District #4 was established which provided service
along Creyts Road between 1-496 and Millett Highway. Improvements in this
area also included the construction of a 1.25 million gallon ground storage structure near the Creyts Road/Millett Highway intersection. In 1982
Water District #6 was established which provided service along Creyts
Road between Millett Highway and U.S. 27.

II

Description of Existing Water Service System
Existing Distribution System
The Township's water system service area lies within an area best described
as bounded by Waverly Road on the east, the Grand River on the north, Interstate 96 on the west and on the south by the southern Township boundary.
The major exception is service to the State of Michigan Secondary Complex
within Windsor Township. The existing water system service area is illustrated on Figure W-1.

90

--

-

-

--

-----

�,-

(c

c~

Ctr

V'

DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure W·I
EXISTING WATER
SERVICE AREA
(1982)

ISi

TRANSMISSION MAIN

[Q] WATER STORAGE
[Q] WATER WELL

...-l

°'
(1)

bO

t1l
p..,

H

::i
(1)

H
;:l

bO
·r-1
~

CITY OF
LANSING

NORTH

�A majority of water mains in the distribution system have been constructed
within the past ten years and were largely installed as ductile iron pipe.
With only minor exception, all mains are at least six inches in diameter.
The system, being comparatively new and largely constructed with ductile iron
pipes, is in good physical condition and has a long-term life expectancy.
The present system of feeder or transmission mains looped along section lines
consists largely of eight, ten and twelve inch mains. While these larger
mains have adequate water flow properties, they have been installed at one
mile intervals which is wider than the one half mile spacing recommended by
the American Water Works Association. The transmission mains along portions
of Creyts and Elmwood Roads are presently undersized. The installation of a
16" water main in the vicinity of Creyts Road and the construction of a 1.25
million gallon water storage facility helped remedy the water pressure inadequacy by reinforcing the transmission grid. As of 1981, the water distribution system consisted of approximately 87 miles of water mains.
The water distribution system provides two primary services; (1) domestic
consumption water and (2) fire protection. Discussion in later passages deals
with consumption requirements, present and future. Provision of adequate fire
protection is dependent upon adequately sized water transmission mains and
adequate initial pressure at the well supply. Fire flow requirements are
based t:pon building size, spacing between buildings, type of construction and
the provision of sprinkler systems. Minimum standards have been established
as to the required gallons per minute (GPM) needed to fight a fire and put it
out. Many buildings in Delta require 3000 GPM with a limited number as high
as 6000 GPM.
As the water distribution system is expanded in response to future development,
Delta Township should strive to coordinate future water main construction with
the goal of strengthening the present transmission network. This approach will
be particularly effective in portions of the Township which are onlypartially
developed. That is, transmission mains can be constructed in terms of anticipated demands of these growing neighborhoods. The last section of this chapter
provides approximate locations of proposed future transmission mains together
with service area boundaries.
Water Supply
The water system has eight wells supplying water into the distribution system.
These wells tap sandstone aquifers at depths ranging from 363 to 450 feet.
The estimated combined maximum capacity of the eight wells is over 4000 GPM
or 5.77 million gallons per day. This production cannot be maintained at
maximum levels due to water draw down effects in the aquifers and the need to
maintain the wells. Total well production can generally be maintained at
3,400 GPM or 4.9 million gallons per day. Table W-1 provides data regarding
the existing production wells.

92

�TABLE W-1
EXISTING WATER WELLS, DELTA TOWNSHIP

Year
Insta lled

Depth

Diameter

Water Production
Rating in GPM( 1)

1

1963

426'

12"

300

2

1963

450'

12"

300

3

1966

390'

12"

300

4

1968

370'

16"

600

5

1970

423'

15"

600

6

1972

363'

15"

800

7

1976

267'

16"

268

8

1976

298'

16"

840

Well
No.

(1},.tJell production is indicative of the amount of water each
well pumps from the ground in gallons per minute (GPM).
The eight water supply wells in the Township's water system tap the Parma
Sandstone formation lying some 350-450 feet below land surface. Rock
aquifers such as the Parma formation provide lower water yields than glacial drift aquifers, but are less susceptible to the effects of contamination from surface sources. These rock wells are deeper than wells in
glacial drift and have overlying strata which slows the recharge from surface waters. Rock aquifers are often highly mineralized, containing high
concentrations of iron, maganese and hardness.
Wells 1-3 are connected by water mains along Michigan Avenue. Water from
Wells 2 and 3 is combined with Water Well 1 at which point chlorine is
added as a disinfecting agent. Sodium hexameta-phosphate is added at each
well prior to chlorination to stabilize the iron found in the water. All
other wells are connected directly to the water system with chlorination
and iron stabilization provided a t each.
Water Storage
The function of water storage in a public water supply system is threefold;
it provides (1) a temporary source of water during electrical power mechanical failure, (2) supplemental water supply during periods of peak water demand and (3) fire protection capacity. The water system contains two types
of water storage, an elevated tower and a ground tank.
Elevated storage is most commonly used because of its reliability in case of
electrical or mechanical failure. Larger water systems include ground storage equipped with variable speed pumps because of lower capital investment

93

�requirements per gallon of storage, the provisions of easy access for repair, and the fact that ground storage facilities have more aesthetic
appeal than elevated storage tanks.
The Delta Township system has a 500,000 gallon elevated tank on the east
side of Snow Road just north of St. Joe Highway. This tank has a static
water pressure at its base of 59 pounds per square inch (PSI). A ground
storage tank, equipped with variable speed pumps, is located on the west
side of Creyts Road some 600 feet north of Millett Highway. The tank contains 1.25 million gallons of storage capacity and delivers water into the
16 inch South Creyts transmission main. The ground storage facility helps
maintain 50-55 PSI in the south end of the water system serving lands
south of 1-496.
Water Consumption
Table W-2 illustrates that water consumption in Delta Township has steadily
increased during the decade of the 1970's. A consistent pattern has emerged,
that being that approximately 50 percent of the total water consumed is attributed to single family residences, 25 percent is consumed by commercial/
office establishments, 20 percent is consumed by multi-family residential
developments and five percent is consumed by industry. It is expected that
the amount of water consumed by industrial establishments will significantly
increase as additional manufacturing operations locate in the Township industrial tract.
TABLE W-2
DELTA TOWNSHIP WATER CONSUMPTION
1975-1980
Year

Annual Water Consumption

1975

502,177,280 gallons

1976

564,380,960 gallons

1977

589,543,680 gallons

1978

638,522,720 gallons

1979

652,324,480 gallons

1980

64 7, 782 , 960 gallons

Fire Flows
As suggested previously, one major problem with the water distribution system
is the undersized water transmission mains spaced on one-mile intervals.
Historically, fire underwriters have identified municipal fire flow requirements using empirical formulas based upon resident population in the service
area. With increasing sophistication of water supply systems and fire fighting apparatus, new criteria have been adopted which recognize the types of

94

�structure and density of development. In 1977, the Township Engineering
Department calculated fire flows for existing major buildings, a partial
listing of which is included in Table W-3.
TABLE W-3
RECO"MMENDED FIRE FLOWS

Establishment

Recommended
Fire Flow

Duration of
Fire Flow

Village Green Apartments

6,000 GPM

6 hours

Lansing Mall

4,500 GPM

4 hours

Park W€3t Apartments

4,000 GPH

4 hours

West Saginaw Plaza

2,750 GPM

2 hours

Michigan National
Bank Center

3,500 GPM

3 hours

Sea Hawk Restaurant

1,500 GPM

2 hours

Waverly High School

4,500 GPM

4 hours

Meijer (retail store)

3,000 GPM

3 hours

Hilton Inn

4,500 GPM

4 hours

The addition of the 1.25 million gallon ground storage facility and the installation of 12 and 16 inch transmission mains along Creyts Road improved
the water system's fire flow capability and duration of flow. It should be
noted that having fire flow capability in well production and storage does
not mean that recommended fire flow can be delivered to the site of a fire.
The distribution mains must be properly sized, spaced, and looped to provide such fire flows at all locations in the water service area.
For purposes of providing adequate fire protection, close monitoring of daily
water consumption demand versus supply capacity is needed. The existing water
system is capable of providing adequate fire flow to all but a few customers.
Furthermore, as service is extended to new areas, need for transmission mains
and added storage must be continuously reviewed.
III

Future Service Area
Figure W-II provides an indication of the future water system service area
in increments of five years. This figure should not be construed as identifying precise lands to be served during each time period. It is intended to
convey the general extent and location of service area extensions based upon
projeclcd service demands. Figure W-II should be viewed in conjunction with
Figure SS-II presented in the Sanitary Sewer Service chapter as to the provision of both public water and public sanitary sewer services to given

95

�areas of Delta Township .
There are extensive portions of the Tovmship to which Township public
water services are not contemplated during the planning period. These
areas are generally described as follows:
(1) All lands lying north of the Grand River between Waverly Road
and the west Township boundary.
(2) The portion of the Township bounded by Interstate 96, Mt. Hope
Highway, the west Township boundary and the south Township
boundary.
The water service limits represented in Figure W-II have been derived
so as to provide water service only to those areas where it is costeffective to do so. Moreover, the general strategy of providing service
is to encourage fill-in of vacant land near or within existing service
area limits and to service existing residential development areas west
of Interstate 96. It can be reasonably assumed that when the network
of wells and transmission mains west of Interstate 96 is constructed,
sufficient water supply capacity will exist to serve development on
presently vacant lands consistent with current land use policies.

96

�I

~

~

{(['

./••"'

DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure W·II
EXISTING &amp; PROPOSED
WATER SERVICE
AREA (1982)

•

EXISTING SERVICE

~ 1982-1985

GE] 1986-1990

fl1
llI!II

1991-1995

r---

°'

(l)
b[)

co

p..,

POST 1995

IS] TRANSMISSION MAIN
IQ] WATER WELL

H
H
I

::;::
(l)

µ

IQ] WATER STORAGE
,,,,"
.,,,.,,,,.

,,,.,,..,,. ,,.,,,.,,..

,,. -

,,,,,, "" ,,,..,,..,,.
,,.,,, ,,,,,,,,

-------✓/

✓,-1·-- --/'
/

,/

//

I

/

,,/

CITY

OF

LANSING

NORTH

Etl:lttt
.·.·.·.-.-.·.·.·-·.·.·.·.·.·.·.

;:l

bO

•n
r,:..

��SANITARY SEWER SERVICE

The tempo and location of land development within the Township is significantly affected by the availability of sanitary collection sewers. Given
the characteristics of soils within the Township, on-site disposal systems,
even for single-family detached homes, are not typically suitable. Thus,
availability of sanitary collection sewers often determines the existing
and future service areas with respect to Delta Township's sanitary sewer
collection system. Land areas to which no future service is contemplated
are also delineated.
Largely because of past growth and development within the Township, the
treatment of wastewater effluent has become an important service provided
by Delta Township. Certain operating problems, to[ether with increasing
quantities of wastewater resulting from the addition of customers to the
sewer system, make prominent the need to anticipate appropriate capacity
to treat wastewater entering the wastewater treatment plant. Future improvements to the capacity of the wastewater , treatment plant will be based
upon anticipated growth. Improvements will anticipate subsequent flow increases and thereby be cost-effective.
Delta Township contains slightly over 35 square miles of land area, less
than 40 percent of which is served by sanitary sewers. So as to control
growth within the bounds of the Land Use Plan, allow for orderly expansion
of all municipal services, and to preclude over-zealous extension of sanitary sewers to areas not now served, a series of five-year, short-term
phasing projections are set forth in the latter portion of this chapter.
I

Historical Information
Establishment of Sewer
Collection and Treatment
Service
The Delta Township Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on the north side
of Willow Highway, one-half mile east of Canal Road. The original treatment plant was constructed in 19(5 and designed to treat one million gallons
of wastewater per day. At the time of construction, sanitary collection
sewers were also constructed to serve developed portions of the Township.
The original collection and treatment system was financed by general obligation bonds and special assessments. The original collection sewer system is known as Sanitary Sewer District #2 of 1965. An addition to the
collection system was constructed two years later and is known as Sanitary
Sewer District #2 of 1967. Figure SS-I illustrates the Delta Township
Sanitary Sewer Service System as it existed in 1982.
Wastewater Treatment
Plant Improvements
Since the original wastewater treatment plant was built in 1965, the plant
has been improved both as to capacity and quality of wastewater treatment.
In 1972, Delta Township contracted with the Eaton County Board of Public
Works for expansion of the treatment plant to provide added capacity and

98

�'

I

(

C

\_
/ '·····~"''''''

~....../

DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure SS · 1
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE
AREA (1982)

0
t'SJ

EXISTING SERVICE
TRUNK SEWE R

[] WASTE WATER
TREATMENT PLANT

~
Q)
b!)

(\j

p.,

H

I

C/'l
C/'l
Q)

i...

::l

b!)

·r-1

I .,,
.,,.,,

i:,.,

,,,,,...,,,,:1,,
.,,.,,,,,:,,,.,,,,...
I
,

.,, , .,, ,,

//,,_] _____ ,.~,.,,
,,

'

I

'

- .,,

/

/ /
/

CIT Y OF
LAN SI NG

NORTH

D

�secondary treatment of wastewater. Under the contract, Delta Township
continues to operate, maintain and manage the treatment plant.
Impact of the Federal
Clean Water Act
Present federal law, as set forth in the Federal Clean Water Act (Public
Law 92-500), seeks to achieve a hi gh level of water quality in all of the
Nation's streams, lakes and coastal waters. The importance of careful
planning in striving for improved water quality has become increasingly
evident. Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972
affirm the importance of water quality planning and "mandate" local
governmental participation in cleaning up the nation's surface waters.
One such mandate is the requirement that a "201 Facility Plan" be prepared by the local governmental jurisdiction and submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency for its approval.
The "Facility Plan, 111 based on the requirements of Section 201 of Public
Law 92-500, proposed to develop an area-wide approach to improving municipal wastewater collection and treatment facilities and treatment methods.
The basic intent of the facility plan is to demonstrate the need for any
proposed facilities, to serve as a systematic evaluation of feasible alternatives, and to demonstrate that proposed measures represent the most costeffective means of meeting established water quality standards for wastewater discharge at the treatment plant.
The Facility Plan represents established plannirL"!; goals and future waste-water collection treatment services. If fully implemented, the Facility
Plan would ultimately move Delta Township into an area-wide sanitary sewer
service system. Delta Township operates the largest treatment and collection system in the facility plan service area and was the lead local government in the preparation process of the Facility Plan.
The projected sanitary sewer networks, presented herein, do not envision
accomplishment of all the 201 Facility Plan features within the time frame
of this Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is not area-wide in
that it does not include recommendations for areas outside the Township.
Also, the Township areas which are to be provided sewers within the specified time frame do not necessarily include those specified in the 201 Plan,
nor do they adopt the same scheduling. However, using Township projections
for population growth and development, the Comprehensive Plan recommends
achievement of the standards for water quality required by Public Law 92500 within the necessary time period. It is assumed that the proposed
future sanitary sewer service areas will be revised in the future in order
to reflect participation by non-Delta Township areas, adjustments to population projections, as well as ·the consideration of land use trends not
presently foreseen.

R
•·.

I

lThe Facility Plan was completed during December of 1975 and sets forth
a regional service area. The report is entitled Delta, Windsor, Onieda,
and Eagle Townships, Village of Dimondale and City of Grand Ledge Facility Plan for Regional Wastewater Treatment, Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr
and Huber, Consulting Engineers.
I

100

I
I

f--

�II

Description of Existing Sanitary Sewer
Collection and Treatment Facilities

(;

Sanitary Sewer
Collection System
As stated earlier, the first sanitary collection sewers were constructed
in Delta Township during the 1965-1967 period and were designed to serve
large areas within the northeastern portion of the Township. In 1972,
Delta Township established Sanitary Sewer District #3 serving the Gettysburg Estates, Gettysburg Fanns and Gettysburg Farms West Subdivisions.
This project included collection sewers within these subdivisions as well
as an extension of the 36 inch Carrier Creek Interceptor. The Carrier
Creek Interceptor carries wastewater from collection sewers throughout the
central portion of the Township to the wastewater treatment plant. Additionally, the Carrier Creek Interceptor serves Delta's Industrial Tract
and the State Secondary Complex in Windsor Township.
In 1972, Sewer District #4 was initiated to provide collection sewers
along the Grand River in the area south of Delta Mills. In 1975, Sewer
District #5 was established to provide sewer service to three singlefamily residences on the north side of Willow Highway near Rockdale
Avenue. Sewer District #7, which resulted in approximately threequcrters of a mile of sewer pipe serving customers along Creyts Road in
the vicinity of Millett Highway, was constructed in 1975 and 1977. In
1982 Sewer District #8 was established which provided service along
Creyts Road from Millett Highway to the south side of U.S. 27. The aforementioned sewer extensions were financed through the creation of sewer
assessment districts. A number of other extensions, including those to
the Verndale Complex and Delta Industrial Park, have been financed by
the individual developments which benefited from the sewer extension.
In 1975, the Township's Sanitary Sewer Fund financed a one-half mile extension of a 27 inch sewer interceptor from the Carrier Creek Interceptor
easterly to Creyts Road within Section 27. The existing collection sewer
system consists of pipes varying in size from four inches to 36 inches in
diameter comprising a total of approximately 95 miles of sewer lines and
five sewage pump stations.
Wastewater
Treatment Plant
The present wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is designed for an average
daily wastewater flow of four million gallons with a maximum hydraulic
capacity of eight million gallons per day. The plant presently treats
an average daily flow of 2.5 million gallons of wastewater, serving 3900
customers.
Problems and Issues with Respect
to the Existing Collection and
Treatment Facilities
There are existing operational problens associated with the wastewater
collection and treatment system operated by Delta Township. Furthermore,
the past growth rate, Public Law 92-500 and the 201 Facilities Plan have
had the effect of placing the Township in a posture of having to act

101

~
~

\

�promptly toward rehabilitating and improving these collection and treatment facilities. The following narrative puts issues in perspective and
suggests an approach to resolution of each issue. The following is intended to provide a basis and framework for the proposed extensions to
the sanitary sewer system which are discussed at the conclusion of this
chapter.
Infiltration
The collection sewers in the Delta Township sewer system are relatively new,
the oldest lines were constructed in 1965. There are, however, significant
quantities of groundwater infiltration and inflow to sanitary sewer lines
in the present system. It is estimated that approximately 40 percent of the
wastewater received at the treatment plant is groundwater and/or stormwater.
There are locations in the collection sewer system where sewer pipe is situated within the high ground water table. Also, a large number of dwellings
and businesses have roof and footing drains connected to sanitary sewer
lines. Some situations exist where sanitary sewer service leads have been
built through an existing storm sewer. These leads may be broken or cracked causing a direct flow of storm water into the collection sewer system.
This excess flow of water into the collection system overloads the wastewater treatment plant. Flow meters at the plant have recorded up to nine
million gallons per day of influent to the treatment plant, far in excess
of plant capacity. The excess of flow occurs primarily during periods of
heavy rainfall, usually in the months of March and April.
A detailed study of the present infiltration was conducted during 19751977.2 This study used daily flow records from the WWTP which were analyzed. The amount of infiltration and inflow was estimated based on
methods developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It was
estimated that annually 300 million gallons of excess flow enters the
treatment plant. An economic study was conducted to determine a costeffective approach to dealing with the excess flow.
The study revealed that itwouldnot be cost-effective to initiate a program
of disconnecting footing drains, but it did indicate that it would be costeffective to remove excess wastewater flows by rehabilitating existing
sewers. A decision to proceed with rehabilitation on a limited basis would
eliminate approximately 15 percent of the excess flow (45 million gallons
annually). The remaining 258 million gallons of excess flow would continue
to be treated at the wastewater treatment plant.
Quality of
Treated Effluent
Water quality standards promulgated as a result of Public Law 92-500 impose
stringent quality requirements as to discharged effluent from the Delta Township WWTP. All present and future discharges from the WWTP must meet these
standards.
Delta Township is operating its treatment plant under final effluent standards. All municipal treatment plants throughout the nation operate as pro-

2Reported in the Facilities Plan, conducted by Delta Township personnel in
cooperation with Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber, Consulting Engineers.

102

.. \
~

�vided in the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issues NPDES permits to each operating
treatment plant and establishes specific water quality standards as to effluent discharges.
Table SS-1 presents sewage effluent standards established for the Delta Township WWTP by the Michigan Water Resources Commission, acting agent for the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The WWTP is presently in need of
improvements in order to address the following items:
- Proposed EPA sewage effluent standards require that ammonia
nitrogen be removed.
- The flows of wastewater to the WWTP vary significantly during
a typical day which hinders the plant from operating as efficiently as possible.
- During hot, humid, windless, days the open treatment facilities
at the plant presently emit a significant odor.
- Excess seasonal flows of influent, attributable to infiltration, cannot be properly treated due to the limited capacity
of the WWTP.
The following improvements are needed at the wastewater treatment plant:
1) ammonia nitrogen removal, 2) equalization of wastewater influent, 3)
odor control, 4) increased capacity, 5) auxillary power, and 6) backup
sludge disposal. Delta Township is presently securing the necessary grants
which, if obtained, will assist in financing a significant portion of the
needed WWTP improvements. It is assumed that the construction of the
proposed improvements will result in the WWTP being in full compliance with
future sewage effluent standards.
III

Future Service Areas for the
Wastewater Collection and Treatment System
Projected Growth
of Service
The increase in demand for sanitary sewer service is directly linked with
the increase in resident population. However, the extension of sanitary
sewers is dependent on physical and financial constraints.
This section provides projections of sanitary sewer service demand, proposed
sewer service areas, and the periods of time in which the service is likely
to be provided. Integration with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan
is provided by utilizing population projections, land consumption rates and
land use as set forth in chapters one and two. Table SS-2 presents actual
rates of new customer connections for the 1973-1980 period. These rates,
together with anticipated expansion of service described in a later section,
form the basis for projecting sanitary sewer customers as illustrated in
Table SS-3.
Once the projections of future sanitary sewer customers was completed, it
· was necessary to further refine the projections in terms of customer equival-

103

1/

�ents and expected wastewater flow at the treatment plant,
provides the results of this evaluation.

Table SS-4

TABLE SS-1
WATER RESOURCES CO:MMISSION'S EFFLUENT QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR THE DELTA TOWNSHIP WWTP
Effluent
Parameters
Biochemical
Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 )( 2 )
Suspended Solids
Ammonia Nitrogen
Phosphorus

Dissolved Oxygen
Fecal Coliform Bacteria

Existing
Treatment

Current
Standards Cl)

12 mg/L

16.5 mg/L

10 mg/LO)

8 mg/L

15.0 mg/L

10 mg/L

Measurement not Required
92 %

Proposed Final
Standards

2 mg/L

Provide 80 % or greater removal of
total phosphorus contained in untreated wastewater

5 mg/L
200/100 ml

200/ 100 ml

200/100 ml

PH

6.5-9.0

6.5-9.0

6.5-9.0

Flow Measurement

Daily

Daily

Daily

(1) Current standards will remain in effect at the WWTP until
the proposed improvements are completed at which time the
proposed final standards will take effect.
(2) Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) means BOD measurement average
for five days.
(3) Daily discharge limitations, all other values are thirty-day
average discharge limitations.

104

-...

�~

TABLE SS-2

I

SANITARY SEWER CUSTOMERS*
1973-1980
1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

2680

2930

3220

3260

3500

3530

3860

3950

MultipleFamily
Residential

100

100

100

120

130

140

190

210

OfficeCommercial

220

230

230

270

300

330

360

430

Industrial

1

1

1

6

5

5

5

11

Customer Class
Single-Family
Residential

~~The number of customers may actually decrease from year to year due to
building vacancies.

TABLE SS-3
PROJECTED SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS
AND LAND ACREAGE CONSUMPTION 1985-2000
Class

1985

1990

1995

2000

6000
464 Ac.

6830
464 Ac.

7650
464 Ac.

8480
464 Ac.

tfultiple-family Residentia1Cl)
Land Consumption

170
80 Ac.

190
101 Ac.

220
101 Ac.

240
101 Ac.

Office/Cornmercia1(l)
Land Consumption

370
37 Ac.

410
38 Ac.

450
38 Ac.

500
38 Ac.

Industria1(l)
Land Consumption

13
139 Ac.

18
139 Ac.

23
139 Ac.

28
139 Ac.

Single-family Residential
Land Consumption

(1) For purpose of computation of future wastewater influent at the
WWTP, all classes of customers are converted to customer equivalents, as set forth in Table SS-4. An equivalent customer (a
hypothetical term) means the wastewater from a typical household
in the year 1977. Based upon actual water consumption statistics,
this translates to 225 gallons/day/household or 6805 gallons/
household/month.

105

�TABLE SS-4
WASTEWATER FLOW PROJECTIONS AT
THE DELTA TOWNSHIP WWTP 1985-2000
1985

1990

1995

2000

Equivalent Customers (all classes)

9,980

11,450

12,920

14,390

Wastewater Flow Rate into WWTP( 1)

2.33

2.56

2.89

3.02

Expected Infiltration/Inflow(l)

1. 59

1. 70

1. 82

1.93

Total Flow&lt; l)

3.82

4.26

4. 71

5.35

(1) All flow rates for wastewater entering the WWTP stated in million
gallons per day (HGD).
Description of Lands Included
in Future Service Areas
Figure SS-II depicts expansion of sanitary sewer service in Delta Township
during four time periods. The strategy for service can be generally described as a filling in of service provided to lands east of I-96. Given
the large quantities of vacant land situated near present sanitary sewer
collection lines, it was deemed logical to promote utilization of these
lands prior to extension of services to more remote areas. Extension of
sewers west of I-96, absent documented health hazards, is not recommended.
However, Figure SS-II suggests serving existing development areas west of
I - 96 in the post 1995 era.
Huch of the projected extension of service will occur in Sections 3, 4, 9,
10, 11, 14, 15, 22, 23 and within the Delta Industrial Tract. In addition,
the fill-in of now vacant parcels in largely built-up areas is encouraged.
As to service west of I-96, it is recommended that existing subdivisions
and the nearby properties be provided service in the post-1990 period.
The customer equivalent projections and land consumption rates were
factored to represent provision of services to this area between 19901995. No new land consumption is computed where service is provided to an
existing building or use of land.
Description of Land Excluded
From Future Sanitary Sewer Service
Any discussion of futur-2 sanitary sewer service would be incomplete absent
identification of areas not planned for sanitary sewer service within the
time frame of this Plan. Areas not included in future service limits have
been excluded for one or more of the following reasons:
1.

A major physical barrier exists preventing the economical
extension of sewer service, such as a river, wetlands or
major highway.

106

...
. ..
~.--::

�2.

Existing or planned use of land suggests no major transition
to urban uses is desirable. This would include prime croplands, specialized farming, unusual natural environment, and
lands restricted from private development such as parks and
conservation areas.

3.

Areas where other public facilities and services have not
evolved to a point where they would be cost-effective to
provide along with sanitary sewer service.

4.

Established planning policies restricting the use of land
to densities not requiring public sanitary sewer service.

Areas which are not destined for future sanitary sewer service are described as follows:
1.

All lands lying north of the Grand River and west of Interstate 96.

2.

Land lying north of the Grand River and situated between
Delta Mills and Saratoga Farms Subdivisions, but exclusive
of Delta Mills and Saratoga.

3.

The entire southwestern quadrant of Delta Township bounded
by Mt. Hope Highway, I-96, the south Tm,mship line and the
west Township line.

107

�~

/'

~
DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure SS·II
EXISTING &amp; PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE AREA (19821

•

EXISTING SERVICE

~ 1982 ·1985
tTj

I-'·
OQ

i=

ti

(1)

Cl'.l
Cl'.l

I
H
H

'"ti
Pl

CJ
LJ

1986 · 1990
1991 ·1995

~ POST 1995

Ill

TO BE SERVICED BY
THE CITY OF LANSING

OQ
(1)

,_.
0
00

-

NORTH

�\

�STORM DRAINAGE
The design, construction and maintenance of storm drainage facilities in
Delta Township has become more important as development activities have
increased. This chapter will define and describe common storm drainage
design criteria, present an inventory of the existing storm drainage
system, note jurisdictional responsibilities for storm drain facilities,
provide an introduction to new methods of handling storm water runoff and
conclude with a listing of recommended storm-drainage practices.
I

Storm Water Design Criteria
For the purposes of this chapter, storm water runoff is defined as the
water flowing over ground surfaces during and immediately following a
rainfall. The runoff which passes a particular point is equal to the
total rainfall in the area above that point less the amount of water which
infiltrates the ground, the amount collected on the surface and the amount
of water which evaporates into the atmosphere.
A common method of calculating the rate of runoff is a formula expressed as
Q = CIA, which is known as the Rational Formula. The term Q represents the
quantity of runoff expressed in cubic feet per second (cfs). The term C
represents the runoff coefficient which is a measure of the amount of land
covered by a hard surface, i.e., pavement and roof areas. Runoff coefficients generally range from 0.15 for unimproved lawn areas to 0.95 for intensive uses such as shopping centers and heavy industries. The term I
refers to rainfall intensity in inches per hour. The term A represents the
area to be drained expressed in acres.

II

Inventory of Existing Storm Drainage Facilities
The majority of land within Delta Township is located within a designated
public storm drainage district. The drains vary from unimproved open swales
in rural areas to large and complex drain systems in developed portions of
the Township. Since it is beyond the scope of the Comprehensive Plan, this
chapter does not include an evaluation of the existing drains as to their
condition or capacity. Figure SD-I illustrates the existing public drainage system within Delta Township as of 1980.
As of 1980, there were 135 drainage districts and sub-distri c t s within Delta
Township. Those portions of the Township which are not within an established
drainage district are generally undeveloped or have not experienced significant agricultural activities.
All public drains and drainage districts are under the jurisdiction of the
Eaton County Drain Commissioner. Some drainage districts, such as the BanksBriggs system serving eastern Delta and portions of Lansing Township, are
classified as Inter-County Drains. These districts fall within the jurisdiction of an Inter-County Drainage Board composed of the two county drain
commissioners and the State Drain Commissioner. Construction and maintenance of all public drainage districts within the State of Michigan are
governed by the terms of the State Drain Code, being Act 40 of 1956.

\

109

�. . ..... _... . ..........

·,
I

"\ ·,

I
I

i
\

\

I
\

''
''

',

'\

I

·,

\'-_,.._.

'

' '
\

,,.......

\

'

\

\

'

\

\

l°'

i\ "-·-,_,.._

\

/
, .,., -·"'

'

\

\

j

\

\

i

\
\

\

\

\
I

·,
-·-

, .,

i
i

\
\

i

'

,. /

I
I
I

/

I

I

\

\

j

,.,·-

r·

\

i

........... ,_.

'ji
i

I
I

'

(

·-.,.

\

,·-t·- ·-·-

/

\
\

I

·'

i

i--- ·- ·-

'·-·

.... ____ .... ___, __ _
~.

\

,

\

,-r•-...•-•"!' ' j

(""'
.

.

I

" I

\

.

\{
I

I

,,·I
j
;

"'·-'

·,

-i

.!...

I

f ---- -~'\.

i...-·-

,-·

'\._., - ~

)
I

i
- --.J

__ ,J

·-·-·--·-·-·_,

I

i
i

L -- ·

!-·- ·-·-·-·j

i - ·- ·- ·-·- ·. ·-·-·--i
i _I
!
•

I

i

I

--\

,;

\ ,!_7

_ __ .,., _ _J
\

I

,..-~\....,.-

·-·-·-·-·-·1

·-·-i

!·-;

/

[Z]

z
)&gt;

-I

1~

C:
:::0

::0

-4

:a:

z

)&gt;

C
:::0

~

z

-I

m

:::0

n

0

C:
:::0
CJ)

m
Figure SD-I

,,

0
m

r
)&gt;

Page 110

C

cm
&gt;&lt;
:,:,,_en
zj
enz

C

..:.. C)

lZl 0

)&gt;

n

r
0

CJ)

m

:::0
)&gt;

z

:J]

&lt;Den

&lt;X&gt;--1

00
:J]

3:

"T1

cc
C

..,
(D

C

m
r-I
:J&gt;

CJ)

C

-I

0

:ez

CJ)

:::c

-.,,

~,
/

�III

New Storm Drainage Practices
Past storm water management practices have emphasized disposing of storm
water in the shortest possible time via the use of an enclosed storm drain
system. The cumulative effects of such practices can increase the frequency of downstream flooding and necessitate major reconstruction of existing storm drains.
The detention of runoff is becoming an increasingly popular storm water
management technique. "On-site detention refers to the storage of storm
water runoff at or near the site of its origin, and its subsequent discharge at a predetermined release rate. 111
The use of detention techniques,
rather than sole reliance on enclosed drains, often provides the following
benefits: 1) smaller storm drain pipe sizes and less pipe being installed,
thus resulting in reduced costs; 2) provision of recreational opportunities; improved aesthetics and preservation of natural wetlands; and 3) reduction of downstream flooding and pollution levels.
The use of storm water detention ponds in urbanized areas occasionally generates concerns related to public safety and liability. Consideration of
the following policies will help to insure safety and improve aesthetics:
1) the bottoms and side slopes of detention ponds should be graded so that
they do not constitute a safety hazard; 2) the fencing of retention ponds,
which permanently store water, should be considered on a case by case
basis; and 3) shallow retention facilities, which cause undesirable weed
growth, should be discouraged.
There are various methods utilized to accomplish storm water detention.
The following describes the most common detention practices, several of
which have been utilized in Delta Township:
Detention Pond:

A basin is excavated based on storm drain design criteria.
Drainage from the site is conveyed to the pond. The depth
is generally 3-5 feet and the outlet pipe is always smaller than the inlet pipe. As the rain falls and the runoff reaches the pond, the water level gradually rises.
The pond may or may not be filled as a result of every
rainfall, depending on the intensity and duration of the
rainfall.

Retention Pond:

A retention pond permanently stores water. It is often
installed in order to store runoff, create lakes which
will enhance aesthetics and property values, and provide fill material for other areas of a development.
Water depths in a retention pond generally vary from
3-10 feet.

Parking Lot:

A parking area is often graded to create a saucer which
stores water. A catch basin or inlet structure is placed
at the low point and the outlet pipe of the structure is

1Temporary Detention Cuts Storm Flow Peaks, Civil Engineering ASCE, Decemhe r 19 80 , Ayoub Talhami, page 72 .

111

�restricted. The depth of the stored water in the saucer
varies from zero at the ridges to 12 inches at the low
point. In lieu of a restricted outlet pipe, a special
cover with drilled holes can be placed at the top of the
storm inlet structure.
Surface Storage:

Residential lots, parks and unimproved open spaces may
be graded to create detention areas. Storage in residential back yards may cause inconvenience to home owners. When surface storage is utilized, a policing effort is necessary to insure that home owners do not regrade their back yards to rid themselves of what they
may consider a nuisance.

In addition to detention, the practice of utilizing natural open drainage
ways as a component of storm drainage systems is becoming increasingly
popular. Utilization of natural waterways requires that attention be given
to antierosion techniques and provision of adequate land area to assure
sufficient storm water carrying capacity. The flood plain of the natural
waterway must be delineated so as to prevent encroachments into the waterway, thus preserving its capacity and storage capabilities. Extremely important in the design of natural channel waterways is the slope or amount of
fall throughout the length of the system. Care has to be exercised in the
design of natural drainage ways to insure that ponding within the channel
does not occur. Ho~ever, excessive grades, which create a rapid movement of
water thus resulting in erosion, must be avoided.
IV

Recommended Storm Drainage Practices
As previously noted, responsibility for the management of public storm
drains in Delta Township, and all of Eaton County, rests with the County
Drain Commissioner. Delta Township is unique within Eaton County to the
extent that considerable storm drainage construction takes place as a result of land development. The significant amount of land which was developed in Delta Township during the 1960's and 1970's necessitated public improvements to entire drainage districts.
In order to insure proper design, construction and maintenance of storm
drains within the Township, it is recommended that local decision-makers
give consideration to the following practices:
1.

Proposed storm drains should be designed in accordance with accepted design criteria.

2.

Additional storm water runoff, which will result from continued
urban-type development, should be continually monitored in order
to assess the impact on the public drainage system.

3.

Attempts should be made to limit the amount of sedimentation
entering drainageways, especially during construction periods.

4.

The use of acceptable alternatives to closed-pipe drainage
systems, such as detention/retention methods and the utilization

112

�of natural drainageways, should be considered .
5.

Procedures should be established to insure that new drains, detention/retention ponds, and easements become components of the
county drainage system.

6.

The proper maintainence of storm drainage facilities should be
emphasized.

7.

Efforts should be made to reduce the pollutants which are carried by stormwater and can result in a degradation of water
quality.

8.

Consideration should be given to the possibility of drafting a
comprehensive storm drainage plan which could be accompanied by
the implementation of a stormwater management ordinance.

As previously noted, traditionally storm drainage systems were designed to
remove runoff at the fastest rate possible. This often resulted in the
elimination of natural storage areas such as wetlands and flood plains.
In essence, the drainage problem was trnasferred to a downstream location.
Over time, storm drainage problems were compounded by such actions which
necessitated spending massive amounts of public dollars for major drainage projects. In summary, what is recommended is a change from single
purpose, fragmented and remedial drainage projects to a comprehensive,
watershed wide, preventative approach to stormwater management.

113

�/~

�SOLID WASTE
Solid waste is generally referred to as materials which you usually have
to pay someone to take off-site and dispose of. Table SW-1 illustrates
annual solid waste generation in Eaton County for the year 1980. Of
the estimated 54,493 tons of solid waste generated in Eaton County in
1980, approximately 79 percent, or 43,168 tons, were disposed of in
landfills. It has been estimated that approximately 75 percent of the
solid waste in Eaton County is generated by residential households.
Table SW-2 illustrates solid waste estimates for Delta Township for
the 1980-year 2000 period.
TABLE SW-1
ESTIN..ATED SOLID WASTE GENERATION
EATON COUNTY
1980
Coefficient*
(lbs/day)

Tons of
Waste/
Year

77,402

40,965

10. 6)~*

4,248

5,223

Retail

5.75

5,238

3,49!+

Government

1.5

2, Lf89

433

10.6

31

38

6,506

4,340

Residential
Manufacturing

Communications/Utilities
' Significant Other

2.9

Number People
(Residents/
Employees)

5.75

TOTAL

54,493

*State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, Resource
Recovery Division, Guidebook of Solid Waste :Management, Table
4-1, pg. 4-4.
**Coefficient was derived from actual waste generation figures
from Oldsmobile and Fisher Body, Lansing, Michigan.
Source:

Proposed Eaton County 641 Plan, Tri-County Regional Planing Commission, 1982.

114

�TABLE SW-2
ESTIMATED SOLID WASTE GENERATION
DELTA TOWNSHIP
1980-2000

Source:

1980

1985

2000

16,215 Tons

18,772 Tons

26,005 Tons

Proposed Eaton County 641 Plan, Tri-County Regional Planing Commission, 1982.

Solid waste collection is presently provided by private haulers within
Delta Township. Most of the solid waste generated in the Township is
presently deposited at the Granger Land Development Sanitary Landfill
located in Watertown Township in Clinton County. This privately owned
facility presently accepts approximately 800,000 cubic yards of solid
waste per year. It is estimated that 78 percent of the waste deposited
at the Granger Landfill originates in Ingham County, 12 percent in
Clinton County and 10 percent in Eaton County. If the operators of
the landfill are permitted to continue with present expansion plans
and if the amount of solid waste does not increase appreciably in the
future, it is estimated that the landfill will have sufficient capacity
to operate until 1998.
Solid waste disposal is also provided by landfills near Eaton Rapids
and Potterville in Eaton County. The County has operated the main
site which is located on Windsor Highway northwest of Potterville
since 1971. This forty acre site is owned by Eaton County and licensed
by the Hichigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR). It is presently
estimated that this landfill has sufficient capacity to operate until
1984 and possibly as long as 1987 if the landfill is expanded to include adjacent County owned property.
The recycling of solid waste is an idea which is becoming increasingly
popular. In 1979 the DNR'S Resource Recovery Division published a document entitled Resource Recovery in Michigan: Potential, Costs and Impact.
The following excerpt from this document defines the terms source separation and recycling and notes the benefits of these approaches.
Source Separation:

Recycling:

Separation and collection of individual
recyclable components at the point of
generation or discard.

When the materials collected are used to make a
product (collection by itself is not recycling).

Source separation and recycling should not be viewed as a panacea for
solid waste management. Regardless of whether a recycling program is
successful or not, it will not take care of all solid wastes. However,

115

�the concept should be looked into and considered as a solid waste management tool before becoming locked into other techniques which preclude source separation and recycling.
Source separation and recycling are positive approaches to solid waste
management because many benefits accrue from a properly managed program. The benefits:
1. Material is kept out of the waste stream and out of the

landfill. The less material put into a landfill, the
longer it will last.
2. Wasting of our natural resources is reduced and our limited
domestic supplies of certain raw materials are extended.
3. Income is derived from materials you now pay to dispose of.
This income may not be enough to pay for all your solid
waste management costs but it could help lower these costs.
4. Reprocessing of scrap materials generally causes less pollution than does the processing of virgin materials.
5. Recycling saves energy. That fact alone makes it worth
considering. Recycling aluminum results in a 95 percent
energy savings over processing from raw materials. Energy
savings from recycling paper range from 20 percent to 70
percent depending on the grade of paper.
6. Other waste processing facilities can be sized smaller, resulting in lower costs.
In spite of the aforementioned benefits of the recycling of solid waste,
it should be noted that presently most residential, commercial and industrial solid waste is still being dumped unprocessed in landfills. At
the same time the number of landfill sites is decreasing due to more
stringent state and federal environmental regulations, the rapid rate
at which landfills are being used up and the fact that landfills are
becoming increasingly expensive to construct, renovate and operate.
The recycling of solid waste in the Lansing Metropolitan area is not
widespread at this time due to the pick-up, collection and hauling
costs involved in getting waste materials to a processing site, an inconsistent supply of waste and undependable markets for the recycled
materials.
In 1978 the Michigan Legislature adopted Act 641, being the Solid Waste
Management Act. This Act mandated that a solid waste management plan
be prepared for each county. The Act contained requirements that the
plan include an enforcement program and process to assure that the nonhazardous solid waste generated or to be generated in the county for
the next twenty years is collected and recovered, processed, or dispensed of at facilities which comply with State law and rules promulgated by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources governing location, design, and operation of the facilities.
Each county's waste management plans must be filed with the Department
of Natural Resources, cover a twenty year period and be updated every
116

�five years. Once the plan has been approved by the DNR, no loc~l ordinance, law, rule, regulation, policy, practice or plan may override the
location of or development of the approved site location for solid waste
disposal. The plan also is required to contain a covenant restricting
the post-disposal use of a landfill site for a fifteen year period. A
solid waste management plan must be approved by at least two thirds of
the municipalities within the planning area. All solid waste disposal
sites (sanitary landfills) must be licensed by the DNR in order to operate and a financial guarantee in accordance with the statute must accompany all applications for a license.
The Eaton County Solid Waste Planning Committee was established in January of 1981 with the expressed purpose of preparing a solid waste management plan for the County, as per the requirements of Act 641, prior
to the State mandated deadline of October, 1982. The Tri-County Regional
Planning Commission has been acting as the "lead" agency in assisting
the County in preparing the plan as well as coordinating the Eaton County
plan with adjacent county plans. '

117

��FUTURE LAND USE

The Future Land Use Component contains the Future Land Use Plan and
analyses of its different land use elements. Six separate parts of
the component describe and analyze residential development, commercial
development, office development, industrial development, open space and
recreation facilities and the thoroughfare network designed to serve
the proposed land use pattern. A brief discussion is also provided regarding the relationship between land use planning and zoning. Figure
LU-I is the Generalized Future Land Use Plan while Table LU-1 indicates
the areas allocated to different land uses.
I

The Relationship of Planning to Zoning
The relationship between land use planning and zoning is an important one.
Planning is basically the act of planning the uses of land within the
Township for the future while zoning is the act of regulating the use of
these lands by ordinance. The laws of the State of Michigan require that
a community engage in land use planning activities, including the preparation of a comprehensive plan, prior to the initiation of a zoning ordinance in a community.
In order to provide a better understanding of the terms planning and zoning, the following definitions are offered:
Land Use Planning:

The process of guiding the future growth and development of a community. Generally a document is prepared known as the Comprehensive Plan which addresses
the various facets relating to the growth of a community. Through the process of land use planning it is intended that a community can preserve, promote, protect
and improve the public health, safety and general welfare. Additional considerations include; comfort,
good order, appearance, convenience, law enforcement
and fire prevention; prevent the overcrowding of land
and avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate and efficient provision of transportation, water, sewage s e rv ices, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing and other requirements and
services; and conserve, develop, utilize and protect
natural resources within the community .

Zoning:

The process of partitioning a community into districts
each of which permits certain uses of land for the
purpose of conserving and promoting the health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the people within
the community. A zoning ordinance is often adopted
which contains regulations controlling land uses, densities, buildin g heights and bulk, lot sizes, yard and
open spaces, setbacks and accessory uses. A zoning
ordinance consists of two distinct parts, being a
written text and a district map. The text sets forth
the purposes, uses and district regulations for each

118

�TABLE LU-1
FUTURE LAND USE
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION

ACRES

PERCENT
OF TOTAL

Very Low Density Residential

2,907

12. 7

Low Density Residential

8,728

38.l

Medium Density Residential

739

3.3

High Density Residential

618

2. 7

Office Development

425

1.9

Retail Trade

645

2.8

Light Industry

599

2.6

Heavy Industry

1,913

8.4

Community Facilities

534

2.3

Parks and Open Spaces

766

3.3

Agricultural and Non-Urban

1,811

7.9

Transportation

2,302

10.0

Grand River

352

1.5

City of Lansing

576

2.5

22,915

100.0

~

119

$'

�district and the standards for special land uses and
admimistration of the ordinance. The map denotes
a specific zoning district for every parcel of land
within the community.
Zoning is one of the instruments, along with capital improvements programming and the administration of local subdivision regulations, which
implements the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. The enactment and administration of the zoning ordinance are legislative and
administrative processes conducted by local units of government relating
to the implementation of the goals and policies of the comprehensive
plan.
II

Residential Development
The predominant land use in the Future Land Use Plan is residential development. A total of 12,992 acres or 57 percent of the Township is designated for residential use. Four general residential development densities are recommended; very low density, low density, medium density and
high density. According to population projections prepared in development of the Comprehensive Plan, the year 2000 population of Delta Township will be approximately 34,000 persons. The residential density pattern has been designed to protect the character of existing neighborhoods
and to provide attractive areas for the development of new housing. The
majority of residential land has be en pl~nned for low density development
in accordance with the character of the existing residential development
pattern. Several areas have been designated for medium and high density
residential development in response to the growing demand for multiple
family housing within the Township.
One of the land development concepts which is becoming increasingly popular is a technique known as planned unit development. Several planned
unit developments have been established in Delta Township. A brief explanation of the concept of planned unit development follows the description of the various residential densities.
Very Low Density
Residential Development
The Future Land Use Plan indicates a total of 2,907 acres or 13 percent of
the Township is designated for very low density residential development.
Very low density residential areas are intended to be developed at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per acre. It is anticipated that very
low density areas will be developed with single-family detached residences
which utilize private wells and septic tanks. Very low density residential
areas are located in the southwestern portion of the Township and north of
the Grand River. It is intended that these very low density areas will remain essentially non-urban in character with large individual lots due to
the limited fire service which is available to these areas. Public utilities such as water and sanitary sewer service are not envisioned for these
areas in the near future. The very low density residential land use indicated north of the Grand River is intended to preserve the existing nonurban character of that area which contains agricultural parcels, woodlots,
flood plain areas, and a few very low density sinzle-family subdivisions.
The very low density residential land use indicated for the southwestern

120

�portion of the Township is intended to preserve the largely non-urban
character of this area which includes approximately three sections of
land designated for agricultural and non-urban purposes. The very low
density residential designation also respects the poor drainage capabilities of soils in this area.
Low Density
Residential Development
The Future Land Use Plan indicates a total of 8,728 acres or 38 ~ercent of the Township for low density residential development. Low density residential areas are intended to be developed at a maximum density of
five units per acre. It is anticipated that low density residential areas
will be developed primarily with single-family detached residences although
planned unit developments or other development forms which do not exceed
five dwelling units per acre could be utilized. It is intended that low
density residential areas will be served by public water and sewer service and hard surfaced roadways. It is recommended that certain limited
institutional and non-residential uses, such as community shopping facilities, be permitted in order to provide convenient services to residential
areas while at the same time preserving the overall residential character
of the area in which they are located. Low density residential development areas are concentrated in that portion of the eastern half of the
Township lying between the Grand River and I-496, and in that portion
of the western half of the Township lying between Willow Highway and the
proposed right-of-way of I-69. The low density residential area in the
eastern portion of the Township is extensively developed with single
family subdivisions. The low density residential land use indicated for
this area is intended to preserve and round out the basic character of existing development. The western half of the Township lying between Willow
Highway and I-69 contains a scattering of single-family subdivisions as
well as strip residential development located along section line roads.
The existing development, while not complete, constitutes an emerging
pattern of basically low density residential development which is incorporated in the Future Land Use Plan. The Future Land Use Plan indicates
small aceas of low density residential development north of the Grand
River and adjacent to Waverly Road; in the vicinity of Delta Mills; south
of 1-496 in the Marcy Road, Guenther Road and Echo Valley Estates areas;
within the community of Millett; south of the Grand River in the vicinity
of Locust Lane; and in the area adjacent to Jolly Road. These areas of
low density residential development were all delineated to round out existing single-family developments.
Medium Density
Residential Development
A total of 739 acres or 3.3 percent of the entire Township is designated
for medium density residential development. These medium density residential areas are intended to be developed at a maximum density o·f eleven
dwelling units per acre. It is anticipated that a variety of housing
types will be developed in such areas. Permitting planned unit developments in medium density residential areas will allow for flexibility and
innovation in the land development process. It is assumed that these
areas will be adequately served by major thoroughfares and public utility
services. It is recommended that certain limited institutional and non-

121

~

r

�residential uses, such as community shopping facilities, be permitted in
order to provide convenient services to residential areas while at the
same time preserving the overall residential character of the area in
which they are located. Medium density residential areas are located in
the western half of Section Ten; in the southeast quadrant of Section
Sixteen; on the east side of Crey.ts Road south of I-496; in the northeast
quadrant of Section Fourteen; in the northwest quadrant of Section Nine;
in the southwest quadrant of Section Sixteen; and within the Verndale Development. The medium density residential areas illustrated in the Future
Land Use Plan are gener~lly located in close proximity to recreational
areas, have ready access to shopping facilities, are in areas in which
land assemblage for multiple-family development appears feasible, and
are located adjacent to arterial roadways and limited access expressways.
High Density
Residential Development
A total of 618 acres or 2.7 percent of the entire Township is designated
for high density residential development. High density residential areas
are intended to be developed at a maximum density of fifteen dwelling
units per acre. It is anticipated that high density residential areas
will provide sites for garden apartments, townhouses and mid-rise residential structures which can benefit from the natural beauty of the surrounding landscape. Permitting planned unit developments in high density
residential areas will allow for flexibility and innovation in the land
development process. It is assumed that these ~reas will be adequately
served by major thoroughfares and public utility services. High density
residential areas are proposed in the south half of Section Nine, the
north half of Section Sixteen and north and south of the Delta Township
central business district in Sections Eleven and Fourteen. The high
density residential areas illustrated in the Future Land Use Plan are
generally located in close proximity to commercial services and are
located adjacent to arterial roadways and limited access expressways.
It should be emphasized that the Comprehensive Plan is a long-range document and that recommendations for medium and high density residential development at specific locations assumes that the proposed development of
such facilities will coincide with the provision of adequate utilities,
transportation facilities and public services.
Planned Unit
Development
The planned unit development, or PUD as it is frequently known, is a
modern zoning technique. The PUD zoning concept is employed by many
communities to encourage innovative and imaginative design by providing
an alternative to the traditional lot-by-lot residential development
that has shaped the pattern of most of suburban America since World War
II. PUD is known by many names including cluster zoning, community
unit plan, or planned residential development. In 1979, the State of
Michigan gave statutory recognition to the concept of PUD in amendments
to the Township Rural Zoning Act being Act 184 of 1943. In order to
provide a better understanding of the term, the following definition
is offered:

122

�"Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a device which allows a development
to be planned and built as a unit and which ••• permits variations in
many of the traditional controls related to density, land use, setbacks ·; _ open space and other design elements, and the timing and
sequencing of the development. PUD, therefore, is both a type of
development and a regulatory process. As a development type, PUD permits flexibility in site design that allows buildings to be clustered;
mixtures of housing types such as detached houses, townhouses, or garden
apartments, combining housing with such other ancillary uses as neighborhood shopping centers; better design and arrangement of open space;
and retention of such natural features as flood plains or steep slopes.
It offers greater opportunities for providing low-cost housing along
with conventional housing." (Michael J. Meshenberg, the Administration
of Flexible Zoning Techniques, Planning Advisory Service Report No. 318
(Chicago : ASPO, June 1976), p. 19.)
Innovative Housing
Concepts
Single family home ownership is still the preference of the majority of
Americans. However, as the costs associated with land acquisition,
financing, maintenance, energy, and building materials continue to
escalate, increasing numbers of prospective homeowners are selecting a
variety of housing styles including manufactured and underground housing, solar assisted housing and the previously mentioned cluster
housing. It is recommended that Township codes and ordinances be amended
to recognize and accomodate new housing trends while insuring that such
housing will be located and developed so as to be compatible with the
surrounding residential development.
Non-Residential Uses in
Residential Areas
It is recognized that it is necessary to provide for the establishment of
certain non-residential land uses within residential areas subject to the
implementation of measures which are designed to insure compatibility.
Such non-residential uses commonly include religious and educational
institutions, recreational uses such as parks, golf courses and playfields, public utility facilities and home occupations. Regulations
should be adopted addressing such items as traffic generation, noise,
lighting and trespass in order to mitigate the possibility of negative
impacts on residential neighborhoods.
III

Residential Neighborhood Module Concept
It is recommended that future residential development occur in well defined neighborhood modules or units rather than in haphazard accumulations of subdivisions or through the in-filling of strip residential
development. A neighborhood module or unit should be a protective
nucleus of residential development in which extraneous automobile traffic
is minimized. Traffic in residential neighborhoods should be limited
primarily to local residents. An individual neighborhood module should
normally be bounded by arterial streets. Other community facilities as
well as convenience commercial facilities which serve two or more neighborhoods should be located on arterial streets at the periphery of
neighborhood modules.

123

r

�IV

Neighborhood Unit Delineation
The residential land use pattern has been organized into twenty-eight
individual neighborhood units. These twenty-eight neighborhood units
are indicated in Figure LU-II. The delineation of neighborhoods was
based on the following factors:
Location of natural or man-made devisive elements
Distinct changes in land use
Population patterns
School district boundaries
Existing land uses
Sewer and water service areas
Census tract boundaries
A brief description of each neighborhood follows.
Neighborhood One
This neighborhood is unique in the Township in that it is located within
the Lansing School District and is also served by the City of Lansing
utility system. The 1975 Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement, which was
entered into by the City and Delta Township, limits the density in this
area to approximately five dwelling units per acre.
The northern portion of Neighborhood One is positioned between a very low
density residential subdivision to the west, being Saratoga Farms, and a
higher density residential development to the east in the City of Lansing,
being Mount Vernon Park. Residential development in this area should provide for a transition between the high density residential areas to the
east and the lower density residential areas to the west.
Delta River Drive bisects this neighborhood in an east-west direction.
This roadway has been designated as a Natural Beauty Road by the Eaton
County Road Commission in compliance with Act 150 of 1970. Due to the
winding nature of Delta River Drive and the fact that sight distances
are limited in this area, developments within this neighborhood should
utilize Waverly Road as their primary access point.
A significant amount of the southern portion of this neighborhood lies
within the one-hundred year flood plain. Development in this area should
be regulated so as to utilize and preserve the natural amenities of this
area and to complement Grand Woods Park which is located on the south
side of the Grand River in Sections One and Two of Delta Township.
The extreme northern portion of this neighborhood lies within flight zones
of the Capital City Airport to the northeast. However, it is expected
that the airport flight zones will not impose a major impact on residential land uses in the area due to the fact that the Capital City Airport
Master Plan recommends that future air traffic utilize landing strips
further to the north.
This neighborhood is bordered by Watertown Township to the north. The
Clinton County Comprehensive Plan illustrates parks and open space uses
along the northern border of Section One of Delta Township.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this neighborhood due to the readily available access to an arterial road, the
124

�(( '

(

(

,11111111111111111p111111111111111111111111,11•1111111tt_11_111111111111111111~111111111111111111

1

DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure LU·II
DELINEATED
NEIGHBORHOOD
UNITS

0

NON-NEIGHBORHOOD
AREAS
If)

I

N
.-l

Q)

oO

:,:

tll

I

p..,

H
H

I

::::&gt;
..:I

Q)

I-&lt;

::,

.oO..,
,,/

Ji&lt;

~~

(\\\'''''''''\

/~(~~',,----~
.,,,,. ....\,,')..,,
/ ~\~\)~.,,,

~.._"\_\'\..,,,

-

-

//
/

,,,-1----(..,~~v
,,, ,,,,,,,,,,

---

\

/

UU1.!JUI!TJ.f.DTI!![1.!J[i~,,,,,,,

/

/

/

28

c,n

o,

~AIIIINI

NORTH

�current availability of utilities as per the 1975 Sewer Agreement,
the proximity of the area to existing low density residential areas,
and the "close-in" location of the area to the Lansing urbanized area.
Neighborhood Two
This area is characterized by large tracts of vacant land and high
quality, country-estate type homes along Delta River Drive and in the
Saratoga Farms, Island Park Highlands, and White Oaks Subdivisions.
These residential areas are primarily composed of large lots with
detached single-family homes.
For the most part this neighborhood is located within the Grand Ledge
School District. The Delta Mills Elementary School, which is scheduled
to be closed during the summer of 1982, is located in the western portion of the neighborhood. At this time a final decision has not been
made as to what to do with this facility. The extreme easternmost portion of this neighborhood, specifically the Saratoga Farms Subdivision
and a portion of the Island Park Highlands Subdivision is located within the Lansing School District.
Public sanitary sewer service is presently lacking in this area. It
appears that the first areas within this neighborhood which would be
served would be the existing subdivisions in the eastern portion of the
neighborhood as well as the Delta Mills Area. There have been documented cases of septic tank failures in these areas in the past. It
appears that the central and western portions of this neighborhood will
not be served by sanitary sewer service until some time in the distant
future.
The lack of public water service in the area presents problems regarding
fire service. The remoteness of the interior of this neighborhood also
results in difficulties in providing fire and emergency vehicle access.
The existence of a significant amount of land within the one-hundred
year flood plain in the southern portion of this neighborhood could
provide possible recreational opportunities.
The Hawk Meadow Sanctuary, an 81 acre Township park, is located on the
north side of Delta River Drive in the center of the neighborhood. This
facility is planned to be left in a natural state and utilized as a
nature area.
This neighborhood is bordered by Watertown Township to the north. The
Clinton County Comprehensive Plan illustrates a mixture of agricultural
and parks/open space uses along the northern border of neighborhood Two.
Further north in Watertown Township, between Grand River Avenue and the
Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad tracks, a significant amount of land is classified for industrial development.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for the Delta
Mills area due to the planned provision of sanitary sewer service within
the next ten years, the existence of a significant number of single
family homes on platted lots, and the fact that support services such
as a church and several businesses are located in the area. A very low
density residential land use classification is recommended for the
renainder of the neighborhood due to the lack of public utility service
to this area for the foreseeable future, the existence of a very low
126

�density residential land use pattern, and the fact that the area is
lacking arterial road access.
Neighborhood Three
The area which is designated as neighborhood three is almost completely
developed with the exception of two vacant parcels, one of which is on
the westernmost portion of the neighborhood and the other being on the
southernmost portion. A low density residential development land use
pattern has been firmly established in this area. Some of Delta Township's highest quality single family subdivisions are found in this
neighborhood.
Neighborhood Three is bordered by Grand Woods Park to the north. This
139 acre facility borders the Grand River and is owned and maintained by
the City of Lansing. Grand Woods Park offers hiking trails, playground
equipment, softball fields, a canoe launch and a shelter building. Sharp
Park, a 55 acre recreational complex owned and operated by Delta Township is located in the southwestern portion of this neighborhood and
features an amphitheater, physical fitness trails, a fishing pond,
tennis courts and softball fields.
A proposed fire station site, consisting of approximately two acres, is
located immediately south of the St. David's Church property along
Elmwood Road. This facility should provide much improved fire fighting
service to the eastern portion of the Township.
One of the major concerns in this neighborhood is the through traffic
which traverses residential areas in this neighborhood enroute to the
Delta Township central business district. The proposed east-west
collector road is intended to address this transportation related problem.
Another transportation related concern in this neighborhood is the Elmwood
Road/Willow Highway intersection. This intersection is presently hampered by poor sight distances and a lack of adequate traffic control
devices. Any development in the vicinity of this intersection should be
carefully reviewed to insure that safe traffic circulation patterns
result.
The entire neighborhood is located within the Waverly School District with
the school district boundary line serving as the western border of this
neighborhood. The Elmwood Elementary School serves this neighborhood.
A low density residential classification is recommended for this neighborhood since a low density single-family residential pattern has been
established and supportive services and facilities such as recreational
areas and retail businesses are located in close proximity. The existing street system in the area is also adequate to support low density
residential development.

12 7

�Neighborhood Four
The residential developflent that exists in this neighborhood is of a
low density single family chR~acter. A significant amount of vacant
land exists in the northeast and central portions of the neighborhood.
Approximately 100 acres of vacant land between Willow Highway and the
Grand River in this neighborhood is presently in agricultural production.
The Great Lakes Bible College Campus is located in the center of this
neighborhood. The proposed east-west collector street will traverse
the center of this neighborhood. Provisions should be made to insulate
this roadway as much as possible from the Melody Acres Subdivision to
the south and from anticipated residential development to the north.
This entire neighborhood is located within the Grand Ledge School District with the Waverly/Grand Ledge School District boundary serving as
this neighborhood's eastern boundary.
The majority of this neighborhood lies within the Watson and Watson
Drainage District. Some portions of this district, particularly the
Garfield Avenue Branch, have experienced persistent flooding problems
in the past. The Watson and Watson Drain generally lies within the
Creyts Road right-of-way and empties into the Grand River.
Sanitary sewer and water service is generally available throughout this
neighborhood. A sanitary sewer pumping station is located on the north
side of Old River Trail within the Delta Mills Subdivision. Water Well
Number Six is located southeast of the intersection of Creyts Road and
Willow Highway. A water well is presently planned on the north side of
Willow Highway, west of Rockdale Avenue.
A low density residential development classification is recommended for
this neighborhood in order to preserve the character of existing residential areas and also due to the fact that the existing utility systems
and roadway facilities in this area are adequate to serve this type of
development.
Neighborhood Five
The majority of this neighborhood presently consists of vacant land with
the exception of the Willow Woods, Robbins Acres and Armstrong Hills Subdivisions and dispersed single-family housing along Willow Highway, Canal Road, and Old River Trail. The existing land use pattern in the
developed portions of this neighborhood is low density residential
development.
Delta Mills Park is located in the northeast portion of this neighborhood.
This 32 acre facility was Delta Township's first park facility and offers
a picnic shelter, softball fields, tennis courts, a basketball court,
fishing and canoe launching.
Sanitary sewer service is generally not available to the westernmost portion of the neighborhood at this time. The easter:i.most portion of the
neighborhood is presently served by sanitary sewer service. Water service is generally available in this area. The extension of a water

128

�l i n e approximately one-quarter mile north of Willow Highway would provide service to both sides of Canal Road which is presently not served.
A Townsh ip well site is located northeast of the intersection of Canal
Road and Willow Highway.
The Delta Towns hip Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on the north
s ide o f Willow Highway within this neighborhood. This facility, loca ted on a 25 acre site, presently provides secondary treatment of
sewage . Planned improvements to the plan include flow equalization,
odor c ontrol and tertiary treatment.
A low density residential classification is recommended for the neighborhood due to the established low density residential land use pattern and the general availability of utilities in the area.
Neighborhood Six
Neighborh ood six is characterized by vast amounts of vacant land and
single-family residences along Creyts and Canal Roads. The only existing subdivisions in this neighborhood are the Earlington Estates
Sub division in the extreme eastern portion of the neighborhood and the
Riverdale Ac res Subdivision in the northwest corner of the neighborhood . Th e Willow Creek residenti a l condominiums are located on th e
south side of Willow Hi ghway imme diat e l y west of Carrier Creek.
The proposed east-west collector road will traverse the center of this
neighborhood. Proposed development in the center of Section Ten should
be r equired to execute the necessary documents to reserve the needed
righ t-of-way for the proposed facility. Efforts should be made to provide for a non-motorized transportation corridor adjacent to the Carrier
Creek which could commence at Willow Highway and continue southwardly.
This nei ghborhood is primarily served by the 36 inch Carrier Creek Sanitary Sewer Interceptor which traverses the center of the neighborhood in
a nor th-south direction. Thus, lands within Section Nine, located west
of Canal Road, are presently without sanitary sewer service. Sewer
lines within Creyts Road serve the easternmost portion of the neighborhood. Public water service is generally available throughout the neighborhood.

129

�The majority of this neighborhood is located within the Moon and
Hamilton Drainage District and would be served by the Benjamin Drain
and the Moon and Hamilton Drain (Carrier Creek). The Benjamin Drain
is presently under sized and in poor physical condition and thus,
should not be expected to accommodate urban-type developments until
improvements to the drain are forthcoming.
It is anticipated that Section Ten will experience a significant
amount of development activity in the 1980's due to the existence of
public utilities, the adjacent arterial roads, the amenities offered
by the Carrier Creek, and the fact that large tracts of land
which can be serviced by all of the aforementioned facilities are
becoming increasingly scarce in the northeast portion of the Township.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for the
eastern half of Section Ten due to the existing single family residential land use pattern which has been established in the area. A
medium density residential land use pattern is recommended for the
western portion of this neighborhood. The following justifications
support the medium density residential land use pattern:
1.

The area is in close proximity to the recreational and aesthetic
amenities provided by the Carrier Creek.

2.

Convenient access to 1-96 and 1-496 is available via
Highway Interchange.

3.

Planned utility extensions will adequately serve the area.

4.

A significant amount of vacant land exists in the area which indicates that land assemblage for medium density developments
could be accomplished.

5.

Supportive services, such as commercial land use and police and
fire service, are a short distance away.

the Sa.ginaw

Neighborhood Seven
This entire neighborhood, with the exception of the westernmost portion,
is already developed with multiple family dwellings in the form of townhouses and two-story and mid-rise apartments.
The Village Green and Elmwood Park Apartment complexes were constructed
in the 1970's. The majority of the senior citizen housing units in
Delta Township are located in this neighborhood.
The proposed east-west collector will border the northern portion of
this neighborhood. Provisions should be made to minimize possible
negative impacts such as noise and diminished aesthetics which the
proposed facility might impose on adjacent residential areas.
Approximately twenty acres of Township owned land exists in the northeast corner of this neighborhood. The Delta Township Parks, Open Space
and Recreation Plan recommends that a community center be located in
this area in order to address an existing deficiency. This facility

130

�could serve many different needs in one area such as
community meeting rooms, recreation program areas, senior citizens
area, swimming facilities, and possibly a fire station.
The higher density residential developments in this area are served
by adjacent retail businesses, Sharp Park and the CATA bus system. A
high density residential land use pattern is recommended for the remaining vacant areas in this neighborhood due to the established land
use pattern and the general availability of supportive physical facilities and services.
Neighborhood Eight
There is very little vacant land left in neighborhood eight which is
primarily composed of low density single-family residential areas. The
majority of the homes in the Bretton Woods and Sunshine Gardens Subdivisions were built in the 1930 1 s, the Irvingdale Acres homes were primarily built in the 1940's, while the Knolls Subdivision was developed
in the late 1950's. Although some of the residential lots in these
areas are small by today's standards, the area has been well maintained
and thus is a very stable and desirable residential area.
All of neighborhood eight is located within the Bank-Briggs Inter-county
Drainage District. A 1977 document entitled Preliminary Study and Report
of the Bank-Briggs Intercounty Drain notes that, " ... the area has suffered extreme flooding in the last few years because of rapid urban expansion westerly from the City of Lansing. This urban expansion is a
combination of residential and commercial development creating vast
areas of impervious surfaces (buildings, drives, parking lots, pavements, etc.) and generating quantities of runoff far in excess of the
capacities of the existing pipes. (pgs. 2 and 3) In nearly all cases
it was found that the existing sewers are too small to serve the ultimate need. In many cases the sewers are old, have bad alignment, separated joints, root intrusion and are generally in poor condition." (pg. 14)
The proposed east-west collector road should alleviate the existing problem of through traffic traversing such local roads as Maycroft Road,
Bretton Road, Robins Road and Clark Road. The existence of a traffic
signal at the Robins Road/Saginaw Highway intersection insures that a
significant amount of traffic will traverse Robins Road due to difficulties experienced in making turning movements on Saginaw Highway.
The St. Gerard's Church and elementary school exist on the northern portion of the neighborhood adjacent to Willow Highway. The former Bretton
Woods Elementary School, a portion of which presently serves as the
Waverly Branch Library, exists in the center of the neighborhood. This
entire neighborhood is located within the Waverly School District.
A low density residential classification is recommended for this neighborhood due to the established low density single-family residential
land use pattern in the neighborhood. It is expected that "in-fill"
housing will be constructed on the remaining vacant lots in this nei~hborhood.
The following additional justifications are given for the low density
residential land use pattern which is recommended adjacent to Waverly
Road.
131

~

�1.

This area is a stable and desirable residential neighborhood due
to the unusually large depth (approximately 600 feet) of the lots
within Irvingdale Acres.

2.

This area is located in close proximity to such residential supportive services and facilities as the CATA bus service, retail businesses and the greater Lansing Metropolitan area.

3.

A low density residential land use pattern has been firmly established
in this area; residences in this area are generally well maintained
and only several vacant lots remain.

Neighborhood Nine
This neighborhood is composed almost entirely of single family residences.
The majority of the residences in this neighborhood are located in three
subdivisions being the Meadowlawn Subdivision, which was platted in 1925
and the Oak Park and Homedale Subdivision, both of which were platted in
1929. The majority of the homes in these areas were constructed in the
late 1930's and early 1940's.
Neighborhood nine is located entirely within the Waverly School District.
The Colt Elementary School, located on the north side of Michigan Avenue
approximately one-half mile west of Waverly Road, lies within the center
of this neighborhood.
All of this neighborhood, with the exception of the extreme westernmost
portion, is located within the Bank-Briggs Intercounty Drainage District.
As noted in the neighborhood eight narrative, this drainage district has
experienced flooding in the past. Annual flooding has been documented
at the point where Iris Avenue intersects with Michigan Avenue.
The most pressing transportation-related problem being experienced in
this neighborhood is the existence of a significant amount of through,
shopping oriented traffic which is traversing north-south residential
streets in this area. The proposed Elmwood Drive realignment/reconstruction between Michigan Avenue and Saginaw Highway is intended to
provide a convenientaacess route to the Delta Township central business
district, thus relieving traffic volumes on local residential streets.
The fact that north/south residential streets in the neighborhood connect
to Saginaw Highway, which is lined with strip commercial development
in this vicinity, insures that there will probably always be some shopping oriented traffic utilizing these residential streets.
A low density residential classification is recommended for neighborhood
nine due to the fact that a low density single family land use pattern
has already been firmly established in the area. Residential uses in the
area could be adequately served by schools in the area, adjacent retail
businesses and the existing street system.
Neighborhood Ten
Neighborhood Ten is primarily composed of multiple family apartment
complexes although two-single family subdivisions, being Frank n' Dot
Meadows and Stone Ridge Estates, are also located within this area. A
significant amount of vacant land still exists in this neighborhood.

132

�A number of transportation-related improvements are
neighborhood including the extension of Ivan Street
South and the reconstruction of Creyts Road. These
improve traffic circulation in the area and provide
the Delta Township central business district.

planned for this
to Mall Drive
improvements should
better access to

r

-

Public sanitary sewer and water service is generally available throughout the neighborhood with the exception of the property on the west
side of Mall Drive South. The majority of this neighborhood is located
in the Michigan Avenue Storm Drainage District although the northwestern
portion of the neighborhood lies within the Watson and Watson Storm
Drainage District.
This neighborhood lies within the Grand Ledge and Waverly School Districts. The boundary line between these two school districts is in the
vicinity of Mall Drive South.
A high density residential land use classification is recommended for
this neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A high density residential land use pattern has already been firmly
established in this neighborhood in that over 1,000 multiple family
dwelling units are located therein.

2.

Public utilities and transportation facilities are generally
adequate in this area to support high density residential land uses.
Although only limited mass transit service is presently available
to this neighborhood, the provision of transit service to this
area on a regular basis should be a high priority.
(

3.

Supportive services, such as commercial facilities, are located in
close proximity to neighborhood ten.

4.

A significant amount of vacant land exists in the area which indicates that land assemblage for higher density residential development
could be accomplished.

Measures should be taken such as the installation of ~uffer strips,
the provision of adequate setbacks, and careful planning of traffic
circulation facilities to insure that the high density residential land
uses in this area will not negatively impact adjacent low density areas
such as the Frank "n Dot Meadows, Stone Ridge Estates, and the Dornet
Village Subdivision.
Neighborhood Eleven
Very few vacant parcels remain in this neighborhood which is primarily
developed with low density single family residences. Exceptions to
this development pattern include commercial/office land uses adjacent
to Michigan Avenue, Waverly Road and St. Joe Highway and the multiple
family complex located southwest of the intersection of Dibble Street
and Michigan Avenue.

133

�This neighborhood consists of two subdivisions, being Castle Hills
Subdivision on the east which consist of approximately two hundred
platted lots and the Huntington Acres Subdivision on the west side of
the neighborhood which has approximately two hundred and thirty platted lots. The Castle Hills Subdivision was platted in 1929 with the
majority of the homes being constructed in the area in the late 1930 1 s
and 1940's. The majority of the lots in the Huntington Acres Subdivision are significantly larger than those to the east in the Castle
Hills Subdivision.
Public sanitary sewer and water service is generally available in the
area with the exception that there is no water line along Waverly
Road. The entire neighborhood lies within the Banks-Briggs Intercounty
Drainage District. The Preliminary Study and Report of the Banks-Briggs
Intercounty Drain, which was prepared in 1977, documented the need for
storm drainage improvements in this area.
A low density residential classification is recommended for neighborhood
eleven due to the fact that a low density single family residential
land use pattern has been established in the area. Residential land
uses in this area can be adequately served by adjacent arterial streets,
existing public sewer and water service and the retail businesses which
are located in close proximity to the neighborhood.
Neighborhood Twelve
Neighborhood Twelve is expected to receive a significant amount of
residential development in the 1980's due to the availability of vacant
land and the general adequacy of utilities in this area. Three developments, being the Fairfield Subdivision, Park Meadows Subdivision and
Townhouse complex and the Westwind Apartments, were constructed in the
area in the 1978-1981 period.
The neighborhood is served by the Waverly High School and Junie~ High
complex which is located immediately to the west. Close attention
should be given to any proposed developments on the east side of Snow
Road to insure that such developments will not impose any signficant
negative impacts such as excessive traffic, high noise levels, etc.,
upon the adjacent school complex. In spite of the number of schools
which are located in close proximity to this neighborhood, sidewalks
are practically nonexistent . in the area. At a minimum, sidewalks should
be provided adjacent to St. Joe Highway and Snow Road in order to serve
the Colt and Winans Elementary Schools, Waverly West Junior High and
Waverly High School.

134

�Several major transportation improvements are proposed for this neighborhood. The first improvement involves the reconstruction of Snow
Road between Michigan Avenue and St. Joe Highway. The second needed
improvement is the hard surfacing of Stoll Road which is one of the last
graveled roads which still exists in the urbanized portion of Delta
Township.
Public sewer and water service in this area is generally adequate to
serve most forms of residential development. A Delta Township water
storage tank is located on the western periphery of the neighborhood.
Storm drainage in the area presents a problem in that property on
either side of Stoll Road is not within a designated county storm drainage district. The Michigan Avenue Drain, and its branches which serve
the neighborhood, no longer has adequate additional capacity to serve
urban types of development in this area. Thus, absent improvements to
these drains, some form of on-site storm water detention will be
necessary.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this
neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density residential land use pattern is firmly established
in the area.

2.

Low density residential areas generally generate more school-age
children than higher density residential areas. Given the close
proximity of the Waverly School complex it is logical to encourage low density residential development in such a manner that
children can walk to school.

3.

Facilities and services which support residential areas are a short
distance away. These facilities and services include retail businesses, playground areas and arterial roadways.

Neighborhood Thirteen
The predominant features in this neighborhood are the Waverly Schools
complex on the east, the Homestead Acres Subdivision in the center,
and approximately 150 acres of vacant land on the western portion of
the neighborhood. There are approximately 125 acres of land in this
area which is in agricultural production.
Public water service is generally available throughout the neighborhood.
A water well is located in the vicinity of the Mall Drive South and
Michigan Avenue intersection. Public sanitary sewer service is available to the area except for the fact that there are no sanitary sewer
lines adjacent to St. Joe Highway. All of this neighborhood is located
within the Michigan Avenue storm drainage district except for the westernmost 80 acres which is located within the Tower Drainage District.
A 48 inch storm drain is located within the Kenway Drive right-of-way
and flows northward to the Grand River. On-site detention of storm
water runoff will be required in this area to insure that the drains
in the area are not overloaded.

135

�The most significant transportation improvement which is planned for
this area will be the construction of Mall Drive South between Michigan Avenue and St. Joe Highway. Precautions should be taken in the
planning and design of this roadway to insulate it as much as possible
from the Homestead Acres Subdivision to the east.
This neighborhood is served by the Waverly School District. The Waverly
School complex, consisting of Winans Elementary School, Waverly West
Junior Highand Waverly High School, is adjacent to the eastern border
of this neighborhood. The installation of sidewalks adjacent to such
major thoroughfares as St. Joe Highway should be encouraged in order to
promote non-motorized travel in the area. Consideration should also
be given to providing signalized crosswalks for pedestrians across the
main roads in this area.
A low density residential land use classification is recommended for
this neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density residential land use pattern has been firmly established in the area.

2.

Public utilities in this area are adequate to serve low density
residential development.

Neighborhood Fourteen
Neighborhood Fourteen consists primarily of low density single-family
residences with the exception of several multiple family complexes on
the eastern and western portions of the neighborhood. The only large
vacant parcels of land which exists in this neighborhood are located adjacent to Snow Road. The entire neighborhood is located within the
Waverly School District.
Public sanitary sewer and water service is generally available throughout the neighborhood. A number of county drainage districts are found
in this neighborhood. The majority of the area is located within the
Banks-Briggs Intercounty Drainage District, the central portion is
within the Maplewood Drainage District, and the western portion is in
the Tower Drainage District.
Since this neighborhood borders the 1-496 freeway on the south appropriate measures should be taken to mitigate possible negative impacts of
the roadway on future residential development. These measures could include the installation of earthen mounds adjacent to the freeway rightof-way and the planting of landscape materials on top of these mounds.
Although there are presently commercial and office land uses located
adjacent to St. Joe Highway, a low density residential land use pattern
is recommended. The existing office land uses, being the Verndale
Development and the West St. Joe Professional complex, are high quality
office plaza type developments. The process of converting residences
along St. Joe Highway to commercial/office land uses or the construction
of small free-standing office buildings should be discouraged.

136

�The low density residential land use pattern recommended for the majority of this neighborhood is due to the single-family residential
character which has been firmly established in the area. This low
density residential land use is intended to preserve and round out the
basic land use pattern of existing development.
Neighborhood Fifteen
Neighborhood Fifteen is presently composed of single-family detached
residences with the exception of the Carrier Creek Condominium complex.
Several hundred acres of vacant land, most of which is in agricultural
production, still exist in this neighborhood.
A number of transportation related improvements are planned for this
neighborhood including the construction of Michigan Avenue between
Creyts Road and Canal Road, and the reconstruction of Creyts and Canal
Roads between Saginaw Highway and St. Joe Highway. The lack of sidewalks in this area is a critical problem, particularly in light of the
fact that the Delta Center School is located in close proximity to
several residential subdivisions.
Public water service is presently not available to the southern and
western portions of this neighborhood. The existing Gettysburg Estates
and Gettysburg Farms Subdivisions are served by private water wells.
Sanitary sewer service is generally available throughout the neighborhood. The lack of water service in the area will forestall urban-type
development in the near future due to the need to comply with minimum
fire flow requirements.
The majority of this neighborhood is located within the Michigan Avenue
Storm Drainage District. The Moon and Hamilton Drain (Carrier Creek)
traverses the center of this neighborhood in a north-south direction.
The southeast portion of the neighborhood is located within the Tower
Drainage District. On site detention of storm water runoff will be
necessary in order to insure that the storm drains in the area are
not overloaded.
A significant portion of this neighborhood presently consists of vacant
land. However, some of this land is not suitable for urban type development due to the location of the Carrier Creek, and the corresponding 100
year flood plain, and the existence of several large pockets of soils
which present severe limitations for buildings and structures.
Efforts should be made to preserve the natural amenities associated with
the Carrier Creek. The preservation of open space areas adjacent to the
Creek could accommodate non-motorized pathways and provide possible opportunities for active and passive recreation.
A low density residential land use classification is recommended for
this neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density single-family residential land use pattern has been
firmly established in the area.

137

(

-

�2.

The area is very desirable for low density residential land use
due to the existence of the Delta Center Elementary School, the
close proximity of retail businesses along Saginaw Highway and
at the Creyts Road/St. Joe Highway intersection, and the fact
that the Carrier Creek traverses the center of the neighborhood
and provides various recreational opportunities.

Neighborhood Sixteen
The majority of the land in this neighborhood is presently vacant with
the exception of the Sherwood Forest Apartments on the northern portion of the neighborhood and several single-family residences along
Canal Road. The entire neighborhood is located within the Grand Ledge
School District.
Public water service is presently limited in this area in that the water
line along Canal Road extends no further to the south than Creekside
Drive. Sanitary sewer service is generally available to the majority of
this area. The majority of the neighborhood is located within the Lazell Drainage District. The extreme southeast portion of the neighborhood is located within the Moon and Hamilton Drainage District.
The Delta Center Elementary School is located immediately to the east
of this neighborhood but unfortunately sidewalks do not exist along
Canal Road. The fact that the area abuts 1-96 to the west could necessitate some type of screening in order to buffer prospective residential
uses from the freeway's possible negative impacts.
The proposed extension of Michigan Avenue to Canal Road should provide
improved access to this area. It is anticipated that increasing traffic
volumes in the vicinity of the Canal Road/St. Joe Highway intersection
will necessitate improvements such as traffic signalization and additional lanes in this area.
The following justifications are given for the medium density residential land use pattern which is recommended for this area:

1.

The area will be provided transportation facilities and services
in the future, such as improvements to Canal Road, the extension
of Michigan Avenue and the provision of mass transit service which
can adequately support this type of development.

2.

A sufficient number of large parcels exist in this area to facilitate
land assemblage for multiple family developments.

3.

Medium density residential land uses are already found in this neighborhood.

4.

The area is located in close proximity to thB 1-96/M-43 Interchange.

Neighborhood Seventeen
Neighborhood seventeen consists primarily of vacant land with the exception of the Gettysburi Farms Subdivisions and several single-family residences located along St. Joe Highway and Canal Road. Two institutional

138

�uses, being the Delta Center Cemetery and the Trinity United Methodist
Church, border the northern boundary of this neighborhood.
Public water service is presently not available to this neighborhood.
The Gettysburg Farms Subdivisions are served by private water wells.
Further urban-type development in this neighborhood should be prohibited absent public water service which is necessary to comply with
minimum fire flow requirements. Sanitary sewer service is generally
available to this area via sewer lines within the Canal Road and St.
Joe Highway rights-of-way as well as the Carrier Creek Interceptor.
The majority of this neighborhood is located within the Michigan Avenue
Storm Drainage District. The Moon and Hamilton Drain (Carrier Creek)
traverses the center of this neighborhood in a north-south direction.
The easternmost forty acres of neighborhood seventeen is located within
the Tower Drainage District.
The Carrier Creek's 100-year flood plain covers approximately fifty
acres in the center of this neighborhood. A natural water body which
is approximately ten acres in size lies immediately south of the
Gettysburg Farms West Subdivision.
As previously mentioned, the intersection of Canal Road and St. Joe
Highway is presently handling a significant amount of traffic, especially at peak hours. What with projected increases in traffic
volumes at this intersection it will be imperative that improvements be made at this intersection which could include the installation of a traffic signal and/or the installation of additional
turning lanes.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density single family residential land use pattern has already
been firmly established in the area.

2.

The roadways in this area would probably not safely accommodate the
amount of traffic generated by higher density residential developments.

Neighborhood Eighteen
The majority of the land in neighborhood eighteen is vacant with the exception of the Echo Valley Estates Subdivision and several single-family
residences along Mt. Hope Highway. Although the Echo Valley Estates
Subdivision was platted in 1965, it has yet to be completely developed
due to the fact that many of the lots have not passed septic tank percolation tests. The entire neighborhood is located within the Grand
Ledge School District.
The eastern portion of Neighborhood Eighteen is served by the Carrier
Creek sanitary sewer interceptor. The proposed Hamilton Sanitary Sewer
Service District would serve the western portions of this neighborhood.
No portion of this neighborhood has public water service.
This neighborhood is not within an established county storm drainage
district at this time. Measures are presently being taken to have the

139

�majority of this neighborhood included in the proposed Delta Industrial Drainage District. A twenty acre storm water detention pond
is envisioned in the center of Section 22 for the purpose of storing storm water runoff generated within the industrial tract so
that flooding does not occur downstream during peak water runoff
periods.
Transportation improvements planned for this area include the reconstruction of Mt. Hope Highway, between Canal Road and Creyts Road,
to Class A, All Weather status. This project will provide improved
access to the Delta Township Industrial Tract to the south.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for Neighborhood Eighteen for the following reasons:
1.

A low density residential single-family land use pattern has already been established in this area due to the presence of the
Echo Valley Estates Subdivision.

2.

The provision of a low density residential area adjacent to the industrial tract will insure a variety of housing types in the area.

The fact that this neighborhood is bordered by I-496 to the north and
the industrial tract to the south will most likely necessitate the installation of screening devices in order to mitigate the possible negative impacts of the aforementioned facilities on future residential
developments. The recommendations for residential development for this
area presupposes that adequate public utilities, roadways, and storm
drainage facilities exist to serve any proposed development.
Neighborhood Nineteen
The majority of the land in neighborhood nineteen is vacant with the
exception of the Homeland and Meadow View Subdivisions and the singlefamily detached residences along Mt. Hope Highway and Creyts Road. The
Homeland Subdivision, which borders both sides of Marcy Road, was platted in 1929 and consists of 81 platted lots. The Meadow View Subdivision,
which borders both sides of Guenther Road, was also platted in 1929 and
consists of 56 platted lots.
Public water service is available throughout the Meadow View Subdivision
as well as the westernmost portion of the neighborhood. The interior
of the neighborhood, including the Homeland Subdivision, lacks water
service due to the fact that a water main is not located within the Mt.
Hope Highway right-of-way.
The entire area is presently lacking sanitary sewer service. The easternmost portion of the neighborhood is located within the Underhill extension drainage district while the westernmost portion of the neighborhood is located within the Holly Drainage District.
The majority of neighborhood nineteen is located within the Waverly
School District. The westernmost sixty acres of the neighborhood is
located within the Grand Ledge School District.
Delta Township owns approximately

l½

acres of land on the north side

140

�of Mt. Hope Highway, west of the GM Parts Warehouse, within Section
24 which is being reserved for a future fire station. Although not
located within Neighborhood Nineteen, the proposed fire station should
provide improved fire service to the general area.
Given the fact that this neighborhood is positioned between industrial
areas to the east and south and an interstate freeway to the north,
there will probably be a need to provide screening treatments, such as
landscaped berms and buffer strips, to insure an orderly transition in
land uses. A low density residential land use pattern is recommended
for the eastern portion of Neighborhood Nineteen for the following
reasons:
1.

A low density single family residential land use pattern exists
in the area due to the existence of the Homeland and Meadow view
Subdivisions.

2.

The proposed open space corridor along the south side of Mt. Hope
Highway will provide for a proper transition between residential
uses on the north side of Mt. Hope Highway and industrial uses on
the south side of Mt. Hope Highway.

3.

The provision of a low density residen tial area adjacent to the
industrial tract will insure a variety of housing types in the
area.

A medium density residential land use pattern is recommended for the
Western portion of Neighborhood Nineteen for the following reasons:
1.

This area is located adjacent to the Creyts Road/I-496 Interchange which affords easy access to the Greater Lansing Area.

2.

The land ownership pattern in this area is such that land could
be assembled for multiple family developments.

3.

Medium density residential development in this area should provide
ample housing opportunities for employees in the adjacent industrial tract.

Neighborhood Twenty
Neighborhood Twenty consists of a mixture of land uses of which singlefamily residential uses are the most common. There are nine platted
subdivisions in the neighborhood. Approximately a half dozen commercial businesses exist along Lansing Road.
Public sewer and water service is presently not available to this neighborhood. There have been cases of septic tank failures documented in
this area by the Eaton-Barry County Health Department. The fact that
U.S. 27 and the Grand Trunk Western Railroad border Neighborhood Twenty
on the north presents obstacles to providing fire service to the area.
A volunteer fire station is located on Lansing Road but due to the fact
that this facility is unmanned, it can provide only limited service.

r
I

141

�)

The majority of this neighborhood is located within the Underhill Extension Drainage District. The easternmost portion of the neighborhood
is within the Maplewood Drainage District; the central portion is within the Saier Drainage District and the Graham Drainage District serves
the westernmost portion of the neighborhood.
There are a number of vacant commercial style structures in this area
which were occupied by viable businesses when the community of Millett
was thriving several decades ago. Most of these structures are now in
need of major rehabilitation, the sites generally have insufficient
lot area and public utilities such as sewer and water service and
storm drains are non-existent. The structures are often located in
close proximity to road rights-of-way and single-family residences.
It is recommended that commercial uses along Lansing Road be discontinued due to the aforementioned factors.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for Neighborhood Twenty for the following reasons:
1.

Very little vacant land remains in this area, thus it is expected
that infill housing will occur on the few renli.ining vacant parcels.

2.

A low density single-family residential land use pattern is firmly
established in the area.

3.

The area is afforded quick and easy access to the Greater Lansing
Metropolitan Area from U.S. 27.

4.

Recreational opportunities are available to residents in the area
due to the close proximity of the Woldumar Nature Center, the
Anderson Nature Park and the Grand River.

Neighborhood Twenty One
Neighborhood Twenty One is composed primarily of vacant land with the
exception of a dozen homes along Locust Lane, Waverly Road and the
Grand River. The neighborhood is located entirely within the Lansing
School District.
This area is served by the City of Lansing Sanitary Sewer System as
per a 1975 Sewer Agreement which was executed between the City and
Delta Township. This agreement limits the number of dwelling units
which may be constructed in this area through the use of density
regulations. Delta Township does not provide public water service to
this area nor does an agreement exist with the City of Lansing to provide water service. At the present time those who wish to develop
land in this area m_u st enter into a contract with the Lansing Board of
Water and Light to provide water service to the area.
The Long Range Street and Highway Plan for the Tri-County Region, which
was prepared by the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission in 1979-1980,
stated that Waverly Road in the vicinity of Neighborhood Twenty One is
presently experiencing high traffic volumes. This document notes that
by the year 2000, this segment of Waverly Road will experience traffic
volumes which exceed the existing capacity of the roadway. These high
142

�volumes of traffic, and the resulting noise, aesthetics and vehicle
emissions could necessitate screening treatments along Waverly Road
in order to mitigate these possible negative impacts.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this
neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density residential land use pattern is firmly established
in the area.

2.

The stipulations contained within the Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement for this area limit the density to less than five dwelling
units per acre.

3.

Supportive services and facilities such as retail businesses exist
in close proximity to this area.

Neighborhood Twenty Two
This neighborhood, which lies entirely within the Holt School District,
is characterized by single family residences along Jolly Road and a
significant amount of vacant land in the western portion of the area.
The 100-year flood plain associated with the Grand River covers approximately ten acres in the northwestern corner of the neighborhood.
Sanitary sewer and water service is not provided to this area at this
time. If and when sewer service is available, such service would be
provided in conjunction with the 1975 agreement between the City of Lansing and Delta Township to serve the area with city sewers. The majority
of Neighborhood Twenty Two is served by the Keller Drainage District.
At this time the western portion of the neighborhood is not located
within a designated drainage district. Access to this neighborhood is
limited to Jolly Road which is a gravel surfaced local street.
Several adjacent land uses could impact development within Neighborhood
Twenty Two in the future. These land uses include the Waverly Park
apartment complex to the south and the Canterberry Commons residential
development to the north, both of which are located in the City of Lansing, as well as the commercial development adjacent to Waverly Road.
This neighborhood is bordered by Windsor Township on the south. The
Windsor Township Comprehensive Development Plan depicts low density
residential development for Section One which abuts Neighborhood
Twenty Two. The plan depicts recreational and open space uses for
that portion of Windsor Township west of Williams Road.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density single-family residential land use pattern has been
established in the area.

2.

The sanitary sewer service agreement for this area limits the residential density to less than five dwelling units per acre.

143

(

�3.

The condition of roadways in the area, the remoteness of the area
from fire station facilities, and the significant amount of land
which is already divided into small parcels merits a low density
residential classification for the area.

Neighborhood Twenty Three
Neighborhood Twenty Three is characterized by a significant amount of
vacant land and a number of single family residences on relatively
large lots . It is estimated that approximately 500 acres of land in
this neighborhood is presently in agricultural production. A number
of residences have been built in this area in the past decade on parcels ten acres in size or less. The Grand Ledge School District serves
Neighborhood Twenty Three.
This neighborhood presently lacks public sewer and water service. At
this time it is estimated that public sewer service will not be available prior to 1990. The majority of land which is located north of
North River Highway is within the Waldo and Waldo Number Two Drainage
District. The area which is located south of North River Highway is
not within an established county drainage district.
Access is provided to this neighborhood via Eaton Highway which is under
the jurisdiction of the Eaton County Road Commission in this area.
North River Highway serves the interior of the neighborhood. The fact
that there are no roadways which cross the Grand River west of I-96 isolates this area. The extension of Nixon Road to the north would provide a
continuous north-south corridor in this area. However, this project would
be very costly due to the necessity of constructing a bridge.
The Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad traverses the northwest corner of this
neighborhood. However, since there are no access points to the rail line
its importance to the area is relatively insignificant.
This neighborhood is bordered by Watertown Township to the north and
Onieda Township to the west. The Clinton County Land Use Plan illustrates agricultural and open space uses for that area of Watertown Township which borders Neighborhood Twenty Three. The Eaton County Development Plan illustrates parks and open space uses for that portion of Onieda
Township which borders this neighborhood.
A very low density residential classification is recommended for Neighborhood Twenty Three for the following reasons:
1.

A very low density residential land use pattern has been established
in the area.

2.

The area lacks certain services and physical facilities, such as
public sewer and water service, close proximity to fire services,
and a quality roadway system to support higher density residential
developments.

3.

A very low density residential land use pattern will be compatible
with adjacent land uses in neighboring townships.

144

�Neighborhood Twenty Four
Neighborhood Twenty Four is composed almost entirely of vacant land of which
approximately 400 acres is presently in agricultural production. The neighborhood is composed of the majority of Sections Nine and Sixteen located west
of 1-96. The entire neighborhood is located within the Grand Ledge School
District.

/

Public sewer and water service is presently not available to this neighborhood. At this time it is estimated that public sewer service will not be
available to the area prior to 1990. The majority of the neighborhood is
served by the Lazell Drain which is an open ditch agricultural-type drain.
Major storm drain improvements would be required in this area in order to
accommodate urban development.
A medium and high density residential land use pattern is recommended for
Neighborhood Twenty Four for the following reasons:
1.

The area is located such that good access to the Greater Lansing
Metropolitan Area would be provided by West Saginaw Highway and the
I-96 interchange.

2.

The neighborhood is located in close proximity to Township services, such as police and fire protection as well as to commercial services along the West Saginaw Highway corridor.

3.

Although not presently available, the area could be adequately served
by the Township sewer and water systems in the future.

4.

It is still possible to assemble land in the area to accomodate high
density residential development due to the existence of large parcels.

5.

The physical conditions of the land, such as soils and topography,
appear tobecapable of supporting higher density residential development.

Although a medium and high density residential land use pattern is recommended
for this area such development should not take place absent adequate public
utilities, roadways and schools.
Neighborhood Twenty Five
The majority of the land in Neighborhood Twenty Five is presently vacant. It
is estimated that approximately 900 acres within the area are currently in
agricultural production, There are a number of residential subdivisions in
this area including Belaire Hills, Silver Ridge Estates, Lea Verde Estates,
Dawn Haven and Greenfield Acres. The Greenfield Acres Subdivision was
platted in the 19S0's and 1960's. These subdivisions were platted prior
to the adoption of stringent land development regulations by Delta Township
and the State of Michigan. All of the homes in these subdivisions are singlefamily detached and the majority of the lots are one-quarter to one-third of
an acre in size.

/

145

�This neighborhood presently lacks public sewer and water service. At
this time it is estimated that public sewer service will not be available to this area prior to 1990. There have been documented septic
tank failures in several of the aforementioned subdivisions. There
are a number of lots in the Belaire Hills Subdivision which are presently vacant due to the fact that the lots will not pass septic tank
percolation tests. The majority of this neighborhood is served by
designated county drainage districts. The easternmost portion of the
neighborhood is served by the Lee and Lazell Drainage Districts; the
central portion by the Greenfield Acres Drainage District; and the
westernmost portion by the Miller Drainage District.
The Grand Ledge School District serves this entire neighborhood. The
Hayes Middle
School is located within the neighborhood in the southwest corner of Section Eight.
Lootens Park, a 74 acre Township park, is located in the center of the
neighborhood adjacent to the Hayes School site. The Delta Township
Parks, Open Space and Recreation Plan notes that it is anticipated
that recreation needs will intensify in the northwest portion of the
Township in the future. Present plans indicate that the combined Hayes
School-Lootens Park could best serve the recreational needs of the
areas residents.
The Neighborhood's northern boundary is the Grand River. The Miller
Creek traverses the center of the neighborhood in a north-south direction. These natural features provide recreational and aesthetic
amenities to residents of the area.
Onieda Township borders the neighborhood to the west. The Eaton County
Development plan illustrates low and medium density residential development for the western portion of Section Twelve of Onieda Township.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this
neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density single-family residential land use pattern has already been established in the area.

2.

The area is provided with relatively good transportation access
via section line roads and Willow and Saginaw Highways.

3.

A community school and park facility exists to serve the neighborhood.

Neighborhood Twenty Six
Most of the land in Neighborhood Twenty Six is vacant with the exception
of the Nixonburg Hills, Miller Farms, Pine Manor, Stoney Brook Farms,
and Home Acres Subdivisions. It is estimated that approximately 400
acres of land within this area is presently in agricultural production.
The Grand Ledge School District serves the entire neighborhood.
This neighborhood presently lacks public sewer and water service.

146

At

�this time it is estimated that public sewer and water will not be available to this area prior to 1990. There have been documented cases of
septic tank failures in several of the subdivisions in this neighborhood.
The entire neighborhood is served by designated county drainage districts. The easternmost portion of the neighborhood is served by
the Lazell Drainage District. The central portion is served by the
Hazel Drainage District, the Miller Drainage District, the Delta Section 16 and 17 Drainage District and the Myers and Henderson Drainage
District. The western portion is served by the Miller Drainage District and the Delta Section 17 Drainage District.
This neighborhood is bordered by Onieda Township to the west. The
Eaton County Development Plan depicts parks and open space uses for
most of Section 13 within Onieda Township, while a small portion of
the area is designated for low density residential land uses.
The Miller Creek traverses this neighborhood in a north-south direction.
A significant amount of land within the northwest portion of Section 17
is located within the 100-year flood plain.
This neighborhood is bordered by West Saginaw Highway on the north.
There will inevitably be pressure exerted from land developers to establish strip commercial developments adjacent to Saginaw Highway. The
commercial development section within the Plan denotes several justifications for discouraging strip commercial development along arterial
roadways.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density single-family residential land use pattern has been
established in the area.

2.

Low density residential land uses in this neighborhood would be
compatible with land uses in adjacent neighborhoods.

3.

The fact that this neighborhood is not located in close proximity
to supportive services and facilities such as retail businesses
and mass transit service could make it difficult to support higher
density development in the area.

Neighborhood Twenty Seven
The majority of land in this neighborhood is vacant with the exception
of the Countryside Estates and Evergreen Heights Subdivisions. Both of
these subdivisions were platted in several phases in the 1960's. It is
estimated that approximately 800 acres of land in the neighborhood is
presently in agricultural production. This neighborhood is located entirely within the Grand Ledge School District.
This neighborhood presently lacks public water and sewer service. At
this time it is estimated that public sewer service will not be available
to this area prior to 1990. The majority of this neighborhood is served

147

�by the Myers and Henderson Drainage District while the central portion
is served by the Decke Drainage District and the southwest area is served by the Munton Drainage District.
This neighborhood is bordered by Onieda Township to the west. The Eaton
County Development Plan illustrates parks and open space uses for the
majority of land in Section 24 of 0nieda Township while a small area is
classified as rural non-agricultural uses.
The proposed construction of I-69 from its present terminus to Charlotte
will impact this area in terms of land acquisition, traffic volumes, and
transitions in land use. A freeway interchange is planned on Nixon Road
south of Mt. Hope Highway. During the construction of I-69, it is planned to extend Broadbent Road from its existing terminus approximately
three-quarters of a mile to the south to connect with Mt. Hope Highway.
The construction of the Broadbent Road extension should provide improved access in this area via the provision of a new north-south corridor between Willow Highway and Davis Highway.
Very often commercial land uses are advocated for those areas adjacent
to a freeway interchange. It is recommended that commercial land uses
not be established adjacent to the I-69/Nixon Road interchange for the
following reasons:
1.

It is assumed that the construction of the interchange will precede
the availability of public utilities in the area.

2.

At this time it does not appear that there is a large enough population within this area to support retail businesses in this area.

3.

The establishment of commercial uses Jn this area could impose
negative impacts such as excessive traffic volumes and incompatibilities in land use upon adjacent residential uses.

A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for Neighborhood Twenty Seven for the following reasons:
1.

A low density single family residential land use pattern has already been established in the area due to the existence of the
Countryside Estates and Evergreen Heights Subdivisions.

2.

There are several areas in this neighborhood where soil conditions would not be conducive to the construction of commercial
or multiple family buildings.

3.

This neighborhood is located several miles from existing and proposed fire service facilities. Therefore, land uses which require
significant fire flows should be discouraged in this area.

Neighborhood Twenty Eight
The majority of land in this neighborhood is vacant with the exception
of several single-family residences located along section line roads.
It is estimated that approximately 2400 acres of land within this
neighborhood are currently in agricultural production. All of the

148

�neighborhood is located within the Grand Ledge School District.
This neighborhood presently lacks public sewer and water service. The
extension of public water and sewer service is not planned for this area
in the near future. The entire neighborhood is served by designated
county drainage districts. The easternmost portion of the neighborhood
is served by the Dann Drainage District, the Mccalpin Drainage District
and the Moon and Hamilton Drainage District. The western portion of the
neighborhood is served by the Munton Drainage district, the Thornapple
Extension Drainage District, the Decke Drainage District and the Fox
Drainage District.
Most of the soils in this area are very conducive to agricultural uses.
These soils also present severe limitations for urban type development
due to poor septic tank percolation, poor compaction and load bearing
capacity and the fact that they are susceptible to frost action.
The Delta Township Parks, Open Space and Recreation Plan recommends
that a community park site be obtained somewhere in this neighborhood
in order to serve the long range recreation needs of residents in the
southwest portion of Delta Township. Delta Township owns twenty acres
of land on the north side of Millett Highway adjacent to I-96 which is
planned to be used as a future cemetery site.
This neighborhood is bordered by Onieda Township to the west and Windsor
Township to the south. The Eaton County Development Plan depicts parks
and open space uses within Sections 25 and 36 of Onieda Township. The
Windsor Township Comprehensive Development Plan depicts agricultural
land uses for those areas within Sections 4, 5 and 6 which abut Neighborhood Twenty Eight.

An agricultural land use classification is recommended for those portions
of Sections 29 and 30 which are located south of the proposed I-69 freeway and for all of Sections 31 and 32 for the following reasons:
1.

The soils in this area are most conducive to agricultural activities.

2.

An agricultural land use pattern has been firmly established in this
area.

3.

Public utility service is not planned for this area in the near
future .

A very low density residential classification is recommended for the
remainder of Neighborhood Twenty Eight for the following reasons:
1.

A very low density single-family residential land use pattern has
been established in this area.

2.

The relatively flat topography within t;he eastern portion of Neighborhood Twenty Eight presents problems in adequately handling storm
water runoff generated by urban type development.

3.

Public utility service is not planned for this area in the near
future.

149

I

�4.

The section line, gravel surfaced roadways in this area could not
safely accommodate the higher volumes of traffic which are associated with higher densities of residential developments.

V Office Development
Two large office development areas are described in the Future Land Use
Plan. The first is located north and south of West Saginaw Highway between Canal Road and Carrier Creek. The second is located in the vicinity of the Creyts Road/I-496 Interchange. The West Saginaw Highway office development area contains approximately 125 acres while the Creyts
Road office area contains approximately 210 acres. Both proposed office
development areas are directly adjacent to interstate highway interchanges
and are effectively linked with the entire Lansing metropolitan area as
well as other portions of the State of Michigan. These two office development areas should provide sites which are particularly attractive to
companies desiring state and regional headquarters office complexes. The
two office development areas, as delineated, are large enough in size
and of appropriate shape to permit the design of integrated office parks
or campus-like developments with internal circulation and parking systems
as well as attractive on-site landscaping. Because of the location of
the office facilities in close proximity to residential housing areas
and their ready accessibility to the interstate highway system interchanges, congestion during peak traffic hours in the vicinity of these
developments should be minimized.
Office development is also recommended adjacent to Waverly Road between
Saginaw Highway and St. Joe Highway. The area bounded by Saginaw on the
north, Waverly Road on the east, Michigan Avenue on the south, and Dibble
Boulevard on the west is experiencing a gradual transition in land use.
Although there are a number of residences in this area, a non-residential
land use pattern is recommended for the future due to the following factors:
1.

A mixed land use pattern presently exists in this area consisting
of commercial/office uses and low density to high density residential uses. Encouraging office development in the area would
establish a single land use pattern and prevent conflicts between competing uses.

2.

Public
office
equate
office
drains

3.

The lots in the Parkview Acres Subdivision which front on Waverly
Road generally have 350 feet of depth. Thus, these lots are
large enough to accommodate physical improvements necessitated
by office land uses such as buffer strips, service drives, parking areas, storm drainage detention areas, etc.

4.

The area is no longer desirable as a residential neighborhood due
to the high traffic voluraes on Waverly Road and the resultant
negative impacts such as noise, aesthetics and vehicle emissions.
In spite of the fact that a significant number of vacant parcels

sewer and water service in this area is adequate to serve
land uses. Storm drains in this area are presently inadto serve office land uses and thus it is recommended that
land uses not be authorized absent improvements to the
or the utilization of on-site detention measures.

150

�exist adjacent to Waverly Road, a single family residence has
not been constructed with frontage on Waverly Road for more
than fifteen years.
5.

Such factors as a close-in location to the greater Lansing metropolitan area, frontage and visibility on an arterial street, and
the existence of an interstate freeway interchange less than one
and a half miles away make this area attractive to office land
uses.

6.

A stable single-family residential neighborhood exists in the
Clairborne Heights Subdivision immediately to the west of the
aforementioned area. The establishment of office land uses
along Waverly Road will serve as a transitional area between
Waverly Road and the low density residential area to the west.

The three block area which is bordered by Michigan Avenue on the north,
St. Joe Highway to the south, Waverly Road to the east, and Hume Boulevard to the west consists of a mixture of commercial, office and singlefamily residential uses. Although there are a number of single-family
residences located in this area, an office land use pattern is recommended for the following reasons:

1.

This area is not a viable residential neighborhood for the following reasons:
a. The lots in this area generally consist of approximately 6600
square feet which presents difficulties when attempting to locate a 1,000-1,200 square feet residence on these properties.
b. The high traffic volumes on Waverly Road make it extremely
difficult for residents to ingress and egress from properties in this area in addition to the roadway's negative impacts such as noise and poor aesthetics.
c. The existing mixed land use pattern in the area has resulted
in inevitable incompatibilities and conflicts between land
uses.

2.

Designating an office land use pattern in the area would permit
developers to assemble enough parcels together to form sites
which would be large enough to accommodate office development.
Parcels at least a third to a half acre in size would be required due to front setback requirements on Waverly Road, and
the need for transitional buffer strips and storm water deten t ion areas.

3.

The area is attractive for office land uses due to the visibility
and access provided by arterial roads such as Waverly Road, lf.ichigan Avenue and St. Joe Highway. This area is also located in
close proximity to the 1-496/Waverly Road interchange which affords
excellent access to the greater Lansing metropolitan area.

The recommendation for office land uses in these two areas is made
with the following qualifications:

151

�1.

This recommendation is for a specific area along Waverly Road
and does not apply to all areas within Delta Township which have
Waverly Road frontage.

2.

The development of office land uses in this area should not precede the provision of necessary physical improvements which are
required to support such facilities. These facilities could include adequate storm drainage provisions and construction of a
service drive parallel to Waverly Road.

3.

It is intended that future office development in this area be
new construction rather than converted single-family residences
and also that land be assembled in such a manner that office
parks or complexes will be established rather than strip development along Waverly Road.

4.

Access to Hume Street and Dibble Boulevard by office land uses
should be prohibited whenever possible since these roadways
serve as local residential streets.

5.

Landscaped buffer strips should be installed in order to properly
screen the proposed office land uses from the existing residential
neighborhoods to the west.

The practice of using secondary spaces such as converted residences
and basements for office uses should be discouraged due to the fact
that the following circumstances could result:

VI

1.

Converted residences and individual lot-by-lot development of
office buildings would represent a poor transition in land
uses between residential and non-residential uses and could result in strip development.

2.

Individual office developments often require physical facilities
such as extensive parking lot lighting, trash dumpsters, signs,
etc., which can negatively impact adjacent residences.

3.

A proliferation of access points to arterial roadways would result which would significantly decrease the traffic carrying
capacity of the roadway and could contribute to unsafe turning
movements.

Commercial Development
The commercial land use pattern illustrated herein has five primary
objectives:
1.

To encourage the continued viability of the Delta Central Business
District which consists of the retail businesses within the Lansing
Mall, Domet Village, Granger Mall and Meijer and K-Mart complexes.

2.

To improve the aesthetics within and the access to the strip commercial areas which lie east and west of the Delta Central Business District along Saginaw Highway.

3.

To prevent the proliferation of strip commercial development.

152

�4.

To provide planned neighborhood shopping centers convenient to
residential areas.

5.

To discourage the conversion of single-family residences to
retail uses.

The Delta Central
Business District
The Delta Central Business District is generally bounded by Mall Drive
West to the north, Iris Street to the east, Ivan Street to the south,
and Mall Drive South to the west. The Lansing Mall, Dornet Village,
Meijer, K-Mart and Granger Mall complexes are located within the Delta
Central Business District. It is assumed that in-fill development will
occur on the remaining vacant commercial properties in this area during
the next two decades.
The Comprehensive Plan recommends that peripheral access around this
shopping district be improved via the extension of Ivan Street and the
construction of a roadway connecting the proposed east-west collector
to Mall Drive West. The provision of additional landscaped areas
throughout the Delta Central Business District would improve the visual
appearance of the area. It is recommended that the owners of the individual shopping centers in this district instigate a parking area landscape program to provide landscaped islands containing trees, shrubbery
and flower plantings which would break-up the existing expanses of
asphalt. Consideration should be given to the street improvement recommendations which were contained in the Street Improvement Plan for the
Delta Township Commercial Core Area which was prepared in 1978 by a
traffic consulting firm. Special attention should be directed to specific problems in this area such as the high accident rate on Saginaw
Highway, the inadequate storm drainage facilities, the poor maintenance of privately owned service drives and the problems negotiating
left hand turns.
The Delta Central Business District provides convenient commercial facilities to higher density residential areas which border it. The majority
of the medium and high density land surrounding the Delta Central Business District is developed but it is anticipated that in-fill development will occur on the remaining vacant lands.
Commercial Areas to the East and West
of the Delta Central Business District
The strip commercial development located to the east of the Delta Central Business District stretches along Saginaw Highway from Waverly
Road on the east to Mall Drive East on the west. The majority of the
businesses in this area are of a convenience nature and are located on
individual lots with generally two access points per lot to Saginaw
Highway. Most of the businesses in this area were constructed between
1955 and 1975.
Strip commercial development exists from the Delta Central Business District west to Creyts Road. The commercial development pattern in this
area is still emerging due to a number of residential dwellings which

153

�are located along the north side of Saginaw Highway and the existence
of a significant amount of vacant land along the south side of Saginaw Highway. A wide variety of retail land uses presently exist in
this area.
Although strip commercial development is not a desirable form of land
development, it is recognized as the dominant land use in the afore-mentioned areas. It is recommended that existing, as well as future,
development in these areas attempt to implement the following measures,
thereby upgrading the general condition of these retail areas:
1.

Further attempts should be made to control the size and quantity
of advertising signs. The existing signs generally have a negative impact on aesthetics.

2.

Access to the retail establishments should be improved. A solution could be the construction of a service drive parallel to
Saginaw Highway which would eliminate some of the access points
to this roadway.

3.

Many of the existing businesses have made no provisions for
screening such items as parking lots and refuse dumpsters from
adjacent residential properties. Landscaped buffer strips should
be installed along all proerty lines which abut residential land
uses.

Planned Neighborhood
Shopping Centers
A neighborhood convenience shopping center offers consumer convenience
goods such as foods, drugs and sundries, as well as personal services
such as laundry and dry cleaning, barbering and shoe repairing, for
daily living needs of an immediate neighborhood. Generally, a food
store is the principal tenant in a neighborhood convenience shopping
center. The amount of gross leasable area in a neighborhood convenience shopping center may range from 20,000 to 100,000 square feet with
an average gross leasable area of 50,000 square feet. The site area
for a neighborhood convenience shopping center should range between two
and five acres and the support population will range from 6,000 to 10,000
persons.
Neighborhood convenience shopping facilities normally serve a grouping
of adjacent residential neighborhoods and are usually located adjacent
to an arterial or collector street for convenient accessibility. Certain neighborhood convenience shopping centers can serve specialized
functions such as a center proposed within the industrial corridor to
serve workers in the area. Similarly, neighborhood convenience shopping facilities, located within proposed office development areas in
the Plan, could serve office workers during normal business hours and
residents of surrounding neighborhoods at all times.
Planned neighborhood shopping centers are proposed for a number of
locations throughout the Township. The locations, which are illustrated on the Future Land Use Map, were selected on the basis of accessibility, proximity to other retail trade areas, and the projected popu-

154

�lation which would be served by such a facility. The sites illustrated
on the Future Land Use Map should be considered as suggested general
locations for the spacing of neighborhood convenience shopping centers,
not as specific locational recommendations.
It should be noted that several existing retail areas within the Township, such as the lands surrounding the Creyts Road/St. Joe Highway
and Canal Road/Saginaw Highway intersections, serve as neighborhood
shopping centers even though these areas were not specifically planned
and developed as neighborhood shopping centers. There are also a number of retail stores located within the Saginaw Highway strip commercial development which serve day to day shopping needs. Planned neighborhood shopping centers should not be established in close proximity
to existing retail facilities which, although not officially designated
as planned neighborhood shopping centers, essentially serve the convenience shopping needs of residents and employees in the area.
Recognizing the increasing cost of transportation, the provision of
planned neighborhood shopping centers in close proximity to residential
neighborhoods is a very logical land use procedure. Such facilities
can be located in a manner which will encourage non-motorized access
and decrease dependence on the automobile. When properly designed,
neighborhood shopping facilities should pose only minimal impacts to
adjacent residential areas while catering to the day to day shopping
needs of the residents.
However, such facilities should only be authorized when adequate accessibility exists, when similar competing facilities are not found within
a radius of several miles, when compatibility with adjacent residential
neighborhoods is demonstrated and when an adequate support population
of residents and/or employees exists within a radius of one mile. It
is recommended that proprietors of proposed planned neighborhood shopping centers demonstrate that a need exists for the proposed facility
via the use of market analyses, population projections, etc.
Limiting Strip
Commercial Development
Strip commercial development can be defined as "A ribbon of uses fronting both sides of an ar,terial roadway and extending inward for half
a block." (Source of definition: The Language of Zoning, Michael J.
Meshenberg, American Society of Planning Officials, Planning Advisory
Service, Report No. 322, November 1976, pg. 33.) The most common retail stores found within strip commercial areas are fast-food restaurants, gas stations, motels, and an assortment of automobile sales and
service operations.
A report entitled Access Control Study prepared by the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission in 1980, describes the common characteristics of strip development. "Inherent characteristics of strip development include:
"A business's reliance on single purpose automobile trips for
patronage.
"The need for on-site circulation an&lt;l storage of automobiles.

155

�- "The desire for visibility and easy access to the motoring
public.
- "Each developed parcel functions as a free-standing traffic
generator.
"These characteristics of strip development create conditions which
severely impair the traffic carrying capacity of an arterial street,
such as:
"Direct traffic conflicts between turning or maneuvering vehicles
entering or leaving a driveway, and 'through' arterial traffic.
- "Disparity in vehicle speeds resulting from vehicles slowing to
turn, change lanes, merging and demerging.
- "Advertising signs, buildings, utility poles and traffic control
signs which eventually clutter a strip development create distractions and reduce effective sight distance.
"Manuevering traffic, frequent stops or speed changes increase
travel time, increase fuel consumption and degrade air quality.
- "Traffic conflicts caused by disparity in relative vehicle speed,
turning movements and land change maneuvers increase accidents
and impair safety of arterial streets.
"Thus, the end result is an arterial street which operates at much less
than optimum capacity or efficiency because of the cumulative effects
of traffic interference and 'marginal friction' resulting from the conflicting service functions of lane access and traffic movement."
(Source: Access Control Study, Tri-County Regional Planning Commission,
authored by Jeff Kern, June, 1980, pg. 4.)
Strip commercial development is firmly established in Delta Township
along Saginaw Highway between Waverly Road and Elmwood Road. It is
recommended that the strip commercial development along both sides of
Saginaw Highway be contained within its existing boundaries. It is
also recommended that strip commercial development be discouraged from
establishing along arterial roads such as Waverly Road, St. Joe Highway, Michigan Avenue and Creyts Road.
Adoption of the following practices will assist in discouraging strip
commercial development from establishing along arterial roadways:
1. Insure that a sufficient amount of commercially zoned land is available at locations which do not result in each lot having direct
access to an arterial street.
2. Incorporate regulations in Township Ordinances which encourage the
consolidation of commercial land uses in attractive park-like
settings.
3. Encourage planned neighborhood convenience shopping centers to be

156

�located close to groupings of residential neighborhoods.
4.

Direct more attention towards land use planning along arterial
roadways. This could include the possible adoption of regulations limiting the number of access points to arterial roadways,
increasing the minimum lot width requirements adjacent to arterial roads and possible prohibitions on left hand turns in selected
areas.

Converting Residences
to Retail Uses
The practice of converting single-family residences to retail uses should
be discouraged. Residential dwellings are generally not positioned on
a lot so as to provide proper commercial setbacks, afford adequate parking and a good on-site circulation pattern. Sufficient space often . does
not exist to accommodate landscaped buffer strips which are necessary
to properly screen retail uses from residential uses. Problems often
result in attempting to retrofit residential buildings to comply with
state of Michigan barrier free design laws as well as attempting to
comply with the floor loading requirements of the Uniform Building Code.
Finally, a common residential driveway is generally inadequate to safely
accommodate retail land uses.
VII

Industrial Development
The industrial development pattern in the Future Land Use Plan has been
designed to optimize the Township's potential as a manufacturing and
warehousing center. The proposed industrial corridor is generally bounded
by Mt. Hope on the north, US-27 on the southeast, Davis Highway on the
south and Interstate 96 on the west. A distinction is made in the
plan between a light industry/warehousing development area and a heavy
industry development area.
There are three light industrial development areas designated in the
Future Land Use Plan. The first is bordered by I-496 to the north, US27 and Waverly Road to the east, Mt. Hope Highway to the south and the
Homeland Subdivision to the west. This area is almost entirely devoted
to the General Motors Parts Warehouse facility. The second is located
between the Grand Trunk Western Railroad tracks and US-27. The third
is located south of Mt. Hope Highway, west of Canal Road, east of 1-96
and north of the Delta Industrial Park. Light industrial areas have been
designated for several different locations in order to; 1) provide
sufficient room for plant expansions, 2) offer rail service to light
industrial uses, and 3) insure that an adequate amount of land will exist
so that there will not be future shortages and resulting high prices.
A heavy industrial classification is recommended for the remainder of
the industrial tract. Although the land area designated for industrial
development exceeds the projected figure of 200 acres of required industrial land, it is felt that the Township should provide for industrial
expansion which could occur beyond the year 2000. Past experience with
the Oldsmobile and Meijer developments has demonstrated that the loca-

157

�tion of a few large industries within an area could significantly increase the amount of industrial development in that area and thereby
increase the amount of land required.
It is recommended that the Township encourage the establishment of
planned industrial parks within industrial areas.
"With the exception of very large plants and those that require free-standing sites because of their need to be close
to raw material sources or because of their incompatibility
with other plants, industrial parks provide the most advantageous locations because they are designed to meet the requirements of modern industries. Operating efficiencies can
be gained and conflicts with neighbors can be avoided when an
area is especially planned to accommodate industrial development. Interdependent plants can take advantage of opportunities to cluster in close proximity. If an industrial park
in an urban area is sufficiently large and intensively developed, it will be able to obtain transit service which can
result in significant cost savings both directly for employees
and indirectly for employers." (Source: The Practice of Local
Government Planning, International City Management Association,
1979, page 265.)
In addition, industrial parks generally result in fewer curb cuts and
identification signs on arterial roads than do individual lot by lot
developments. Since the businesses in industrial parks are concentrated, it is often easier to cooperatively provide for such needs as
storm water detention and rail service.
VIII Parks, Open Space and Recreation Facilities Development
In 1978 the Delta Township Parks and Recreation Commission prepared a
Parks, Open Space and Recreation Plan for the Township. The plan contains an inventory of existing park facilities, notes deficiencies in the
parks system based on accepted recreation standards, contains a goals
statement, and concludes with a parks and recreation master plan. The
Parks and Open Space Plan and the Comprehensive Plan are well coordinated in that they utilize the same population projections and neighborhood units. Rather than attempt to duplicate the contents and recommendations contained within the Parks and Open Space Plan, the Land Use
Plan depicts the future parks and open space sites which are illustrated
on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Figure LU-III depicts private
and public park facilities in the Township as well as designating four
green belts.
The four major green
depicted serve two purposes. First, the
green belts reflect one hundred year flood plain areas and attempt
to preserve these areas in their natural state as much as possible.
Secondly, these green belts are intended to be used to screen intensive industrial uses from less intensive residential uses
The Carrier Creek Green Belt
The Carrier Creek Green Belt begins at the Grand River and continues three
miles to the south to Mt. Hope Highway. This area has the potential to

158

�"--..,

---

/~/'

')

\_(

\.l

j.

~

TOWNSHIP

DELTA
PARKS

AND

PUBLIC

GREEN BEL TS

PARKS

ANDERSON
2

DELTA

MILLS

3

ERICKSON

4

GRAND

WOODS (Cltyof Lansing)

5

HAWK

MEADOWS

Q"I

....
l/')

Q)

bO

cu

p.,

6

LELAND

7

LOOTENS

8

SHARP

H
H

H

C:=J
/

/✓ ::://
£,,

,,,,,,. .,,,."'

----

/

I

/

.,,..,,,

I
p
H
Q)

H

;j

PRIVATE RECREATIONAL AREAS
9

INGHAM COUNTY CONSERVATION LEAGUE

10

WOLDUMAR NATURE CENTER

H&gt;&gt;d GREEN

BELTS

/

,,

/
/

A

CARRIER CREEK

8

MT. HOPE HIGHWAY

C

NORTH GRAND RIVER

D

SOUTH GRAND RIVER

NORTH

FIGURE

LU I I I

bO

•r-f
µ.,

�offer a myriad of recreational opportunities, ranging from a casual
picnic lunch for adjacent residents or office workers to an all-day
hiki.ng or bicycling outing. It is anticipated that the majority of the
open space, which will be preserved adjacent to the Carrier Creek, will
lie within the 100-year flood plain due to the fact that the Township
Zoning Ordinance prohibits permanent structures within such areas. It
is recommended that a minimum distance of 50 feet from either side of
the Creek be preserved for the open space corridor. The 100 feet wide
open space corridor should provide adequate space to accommodate bicycle paths and pedestrian walkways in the area. Fences and other
structural facilities which obstruct access to the open space area
should be discouraged.
It should be noted that the Carrier Creek, between the Grand River and
I-496 is established as the Moon and Hamilton County Drain and is under
the jurisdiction of the Eaton County Drain Commissioner. Since the
Carrier Creek serves as a county drain, its primary purpose is to provide a storm water runoff outlet for properties within the storm drainage district. There will be a need to periodically clean and maintain
the drainage channel which could impact the natural vegetation in the
area.
It is hoped that land owners and developers adjacent to the Carrier
Creek will voluntarily enter into open space agreements with the Township to assure the preservation of the area in its natural state. It
would be cost prohibitive for the Township to attempt to purchase land
adjacent to the Carrier Creek for the purpose of reserving the land as
open space.
North Grand River
Green Belt
The second major open space area runs north and south of the Grand River
between Royston Road on the west and Webster Street on the east. This
area has excellent potential for development of day use facilities and
water oriented recreation. The Carrier Creek green belt and the north
Grand River green belt are linked at a common point and could provide
the opportunity for continuous hiking and bicycling.
South Grand River
Green Belt
The third major green belt is located between Lansing Road and the south
course of the Grand River and contains the Anderson Nature Park and
Woldumar Nature Center. The short-range improvements which are planned
for Anderson Nature Park include fencing the perimeter of the site, upgrading existing nature trails, improving Wardell Road and the installation of an off-road parking area. Long-range improvements include the
construction of a building to accommodate the propos ed nature interpretation program. Continued efforts should be made to coordinate Anderson
Nature Park's development and programming with the Woldumar Nature Center.
Mt. Hope Highway
Green Belt
The fourth major green belt is located along the south side of Mt. Hope

160

�Highway between 1-96 and U.S. 27. The purpose of this green Belt is
to provide an effective separation between the planned industrial uses
on the south side of Mt. Hope Highway and the residential uses to the
north. It is recommended that the green belt have a minimum width of
50 feet and that it be landscaped with trees and shrubbery. Due to
the relatively narrow width of the green belt, it is assumed that the
area will serve passive recreational pursuits rather than active recreational uses. Consideration should be given to the installation of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway in this area which could serve workers who
live in close proximity to the industrial tract.
Private Development of
Open Space Areas
It is anticipated that portions of each of the recommended green belts
will be developed and maintained as private or commercial recreation
facilities. Such facilities could include golf courses, sportsmen's
clubs, nature study preserves and various kinds of commercial recreation facilities which will maintain the natural beauty of the green belt
areas while not disrupting their continuity.
IX

Proposed Thoroughfare Improvements
Fi gure LU-I V illustrates improvements proposed for Delta Township's
thoroughfare network. The thoroughfare improvements illustrated in Figure LU-IV are designed to either correct deficiencies in the existing
thoroughfare network or to serve the land development pattern contained
in the Comprehensive Plan.
Table LU-2 contains a description of each proposed thoroughfare improvement and a summary of the primary purposes the proposed improvement is
intended to fulfill. Cost estimates have not been provided due to the
volatile nature of road construction costs. Funding for many of the proposed projects is expected to be provided by federal monies, specifically
Federal Aid to Urban Systems Funds, and non-federal sources such as the
MDOT and Eaton County Road Commission. The road improvement projects do
not appear in order of priority.

161

�C

z

:c

&lt;(

z

a:~
~o
cna:
co.

a.

LLJ (.)
LLJ LLJ

en
3:

0

I-

-::::&gt;&gt;
..J

&lt;
I..J

w

C

en

~~

...::::,
·-LL

•
U,&lt;(
LLJ

Cl)

03:

C)

Oc,

0. ::c:

a:-

0. ::c:

I-

()

w
-,

0

er:

Q.

0

w

en
0

Q.

ii

0

er:
Q.

I

I
I

\

I
\

I

\

\

\

\

\

\
\

\
\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\
\
\

\

\

\

\

\
\

I

'

I
II

'

'
' \

\

I

\

/
\

I

\

I
\ I
I I
I I

I I
I I
I I

I I

--

I
I

I
I

I)
I

Figure LU-IV

Page 162

I

/

�TABLE LU-2
PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
NAME

LENGTH
(MILES)

PROPOSED
IHPROVEMENTS

LOCATION

New construction/reconstruction, realignment, widen to four
lanes, install turn
lanes.

PRINARY
PURPOSE (S)
Eliminate
through traffic from a
residential
neighborhood,
improve circulation

•5

Saginaw Hwy to
Hichigan Ave.

Willow Highway

3.5

Waverly Rd. to
Canal Rd.

Interstate 69

2.0

Royston Rd. to
1-96

Construction of an
expressway, interchange at Nixon Rd.,
overpass at Royston
Rd. and Broadbent Rd.

Provides connection to
major midwestern metropolitan areas and
the State Capitols of Michigan and Indiana

Creyts Rd./
1-496 interchange

Widen bridf,e structure to four lanes,
install two loop
ramps.

Improve traffic
circulation and
traffic carrying capacity,
facilitate
left turns

Creyts Rd. to
Canal Rd.

Reconstruction,
correct vertical
alignment, additional lanes at
selected points

Improve traffic
circulation and
traffic carrying capacity

Elmwood Dr.

Creyts Rd./
1-496 interchange

St. Joe Hwy.

1.0

Resurfacing, drainage
outlet, additional lanes
at selected points

163

Improve condition of existing roadway
surface

�TABLE LU-2
PROPOSED ROAD IHPROVE}IBNTS
(continued)
PROJECT
NAME
East-West
Collector St.
(Willow St.
extension)

LENGTH
(MILES)

Davis Hwy.
extension

PRIMARY
PURPOSE(S)

Willow Hwy. to
Elmwood Rd.

New construction

1.0

Elmwood Rd.
to Creyts Rd.

New construction

1.0

Creyts Rd. to
Canal Rd.

New construction
Bridge structure

Snow Rd.
intersection

Realignment of
intersection, ROW
acquisition, radius
improvements

Improve turning movements

Willow Hwy.
to Eaton Hwy.

New construction,
bridge structure

Provide a needed north-south
corridor with
a river crossing in the
western portion of the
Township .

Canal Rd.
east to existing
terminus

New construction

Provide improved access
within Industrial Tract

.5

Mt. Hope
Hwy.

Nixon Rd.
extension

PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS

LOCATION

1.0

. 25

164

Provide alternative east-west
access other
than W. Saginaw Hwy.,
eliminate
through traffic from residential neighborhoods

�TABLE Lu-2
PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
(continued)

PROJECT
NAME
Creyts Rd.

Royston Rd.
extension

LENGTH
(MILES)

LOCATION

PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS

1.0

U.S. 27 to Millett Hwy.

Acceleration/deceleration lanes, intersection improvements,
drainage outlet.

1.0

Millett Hwy to
Mt. Hope Hwy.

ROW acquisition,
drainage outlet,
acceleration/deceleration lanes,
additional lanes
at selected points.

•5

Mt. Hope Hwy.
to I-496

ROW acquisition,
widen to four lanes,
drainage outlet,
shoulder improvements.

.5

1-496 to St .
Joe Hwy.

ROW acquisition,
widen to four lanes,
extend length of
right turn lane .

•5

St. Joe Hwy.
to Michigan
Ave.

ROW acquisition,
additional lanes at
selected points,
improve vertical
alignment.

•5

Michigan Ave.
to Saginaw
Hwy.

ROW acquisition,
additional lanes
at selected points,
drainage outlet.

St. Joe Hwy.
to Willow
Hwy.

New construction

2.0

165

PRIMARY
PURPOSE(S)
Improve traffic circulation and traffic carrying
capacity.

Provide improved north-south
traffic movements in the
western portion
of the Township

�TABLE LU-2
PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
(continued)

PROJECT

NAME
Arterial
Service
Drives

Snow Rd.

Canal Rd.

LENGTH
(MILES)

PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS

LOCATION

PRIMARY
PURPOSE(S)

2.0

North side of
West Saginaw
Hwy. between
Waverly and
Creyts

New construction

2.0

South side of
West Saginaw
Hwy. between
Waverly and
Creyts

New constriction

1.0

West side of
Waverly Rd.
between
Saginaw Hwy.
and St. Joe
Hwy.

New construction

Michigan Ave .
to St. Joe
Hwy.

Reconstruction,
realignment,
service drive,
intersection
improvements.

Improve traffic circulation and traffic carrying
capacity.

St. Joe Hwy.
to Willow Hwy.

Additional lanes at
selected points, improve vertical alignment, intersection
improvements.

Improve sight
distances,
improve traffic carrying
capacity.

.5

2.0

166

Improve traffic circulation and traffic carrying
capacity on
arterial roads,
provide for improved ingress
and egress to
retail properties, provide for safer
traffic conditions.

�TABLE LU-2
PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
(continued)

PROJECT
NAME
Mall Drive
South

Michigan Ave.
Extension

Mall Drive
North

Millett Hwy.

LENGTH
(MILES)

PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS

LOCATION

PRIMARY
PURPOSE(S)

.s

Michigan Ave .
to St. Joe
Hwy.

New construction

Improve traffic circulation
and eliminate
through traffic from a
residential
subdivision.

1.0

Creyts Rd. to
Canal Rd.

New Construction
Bridge construction

Improve traffic circulation, provide
an alternative
east-west route
other than West
Saginaw Hwy.

Mall Drive
west to Willow
St. extended

New construction

Improve traffic
circulation in
the Delta Township central
business
district.

Creyts Rd.
to Canal Rd.

ROW acquisition,
increase roadway
width, drainage
outlet, Class A
shoulders, acceleration/deceleration lanes,
improve vertical
alignment.

Improve sight
distances,
provide adequate roadway
width, improve
ingress and
egress to the
roadway at
selected
points.

.s

1.0

167

�TABLE LU-2
PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
(continued)
PROJECT
NAME

LENGTH
(MILES)

Mt. Hope
Hwy.

1.0

PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS

LOCATION

PRIMARY
PURPOSE(S)

Creyts Rd. to
Canal Rd.

ROW acquisition. all
weather cap, Class A
shoulders, drainage
outlet, additional
lanes at selected
points, improve
vertical alignment.

Convert roadway to Class
A all-weather
status, improve sight
distances, improve ingress
and egress to
the roadway
at selected
points.

Ivan St.
Extension

•5

Extended to
Mall Drive
South

New construction

Provide improved access to
the Delta Township central
business district, eliminate through
traffic from
residential
neighborhoods.

Broadbent Rd.
Extension

.5

Extend to
Mt. Hope
Hwy.

New construction

Improve northsouth access
in the Township.

168

�/

�COHMUNITY FACILITIES
The Community Facilities Component of the Comprehensive Plan consists of
five parts. In Part I Township offices and departments are analyzed and
a brief description is given of major Township buildings. Part II contains a review of police protection services which are contractually
provided to the Township by the Eaton County Sheriff's Department. The
discussion examines the level of existing police service and describes
future law enforcement needs. Part III consists of an evaluation of
Township fire protection needs. Existing fire facilities are analyzed
and future needs are reviewed. Part IV consists of a r e view of existing library service provided to Township residents. Finally, Part V
contains an analysis of existing and future school facility needs of
the Waverly and Grand Ledge School Districts.
I

Governmental Offices and Departments
Table CF-1 contains a listing of
ings. The listing only includes
does not include such facilities
structures or other buildings of

the major Delta Township owned buildthe larger Township structures and
as well houses, lift stations, park
less than 1,000 square feet.

The Delta Township Administration Building is the most prominent Township owned structure. The building contains the offices of the Township Clerk as well as the Building, Accounting, Engineering, Planning,
Parks and Assessing Departments. The Administration Building is almost fully occupied at the present time. It is anticipated that additional space will be needed to house Township administrative offices
within t h e next ten years.
It is recommended that a Township space needs study be undertaken in
the future. The purpose of the study would be to conduct an inventory
of existing Township floor space, analyze manpower needs, and provide
a projection of future space requirements for Township governmental
functions.
II

Police Protection
The Police Department is responsible for the safety and security of the
Township. The Department regularly patrols Township thoroughfares as
well as commercial, industrial and residential areas. Other responsibilities of the Police Department include the serving of warrants, subpoenas and other forms of legal process, execution of court orders and
transport of offenders to the Eaton County Sheriff's Department . Table
CF-2 illustrates the workload of the Delta Patrol Division for the
period of 1975-1981.

169

�TABLE CF-1
INVENTORY OF MAJOR DELTA TOWNSHIP OWNED BUILDINGS
Square
Footage

Primary Use

Building
Administration Building

Houses the majority of
Township departments

Parks Department Building

Date of
Construction

10,600

1970

Parks maintenance
equipment is stored
and repaired here

1,900
1,400

1973
1977

Water Department Building

Houses Water Department offices, well
controls and monitoring equipment, and
maintenance equipment

3,300

1970

Wastewater Treatment
Building

Contains the Wastewater
Treatment Department
offices, laboratory and
monitoring equipment
and an incinerator

8,000

1971

Fire Station One

Houses Delta Township
Fire Department

3,700

1956

Fire Station Two

Houses fire fighting
equipment

2,600

1979

Sheriff's Department
Sub-Station

Houses the Eaton County
Sheriffs Department's
Delta Patrol Division

2,900

1982

TABLE CF-2
DELTA PATROL DIVISION ACTIVITIES
1975-1981
1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

6,269

7,199

6,982

7,554

8,590

7,927

7,631

Total Accidents

842

853

924

1,141

1,206

836

869

Total Arrests

862

719

495

322

575

876

856

2,458

2,821

1,981

3,164

2,748

3,594

4,409

Total Calls for Service

Total Traffic Tickets

170

�Existing Service
Delta Township has contracted with the Eaton County Sheriff's Department
for police protection since 1970. There are six patrol cars and twentyone employees which are permanently assigned to the Delta sub-station.
In 1982 the police force moved into a new 2900 sq. ft. building on
Administrative Drive.
At the present time there is one lieutenant, two sergeants, one secretary and seventeen patrol deputies employed at the Delta Township substation. Additionally, a detective is based in Charlotte. The police
department presently does not man the sub-station on a twenty-four
hour basis. All calls at all hours are dispatched through the Eaton
County Sheriff's office in Charlotte.
Future Needs
Police service is generally proivded by dividing the geographic area
of the community into patrol districts. The factors determining the
size of districts include cirme rates, overall size, geographic conditions, traffic conditions, population densities and response times.
The Delta Patrol Division has divided the Township into four service
districts.
There are no uniform "need for services" standards available for police
service because these factors vary significantly from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction. The national average for police service is presently 1.6
officers per 1,000 residents. The present ratio in Delta Township is
approximately .8 officer per 1,000 residents.
Although additional manpower was added to the Delta Township Patrol
Division in 1982, continuing demands for police service preclude little
specialization in order to cover investigation activities. More personel is needed for a wide variety of required specialties such as
juvenile officer, traffic specialists, full time worthless document
investigator and additional command/administration personnel.

171

�III

Fire Protection
Personnel
Prior to 1970 the Fire Department was staffed by a fire chief and volunteers. At the present time the Fire Department staff consists of
a fire chief, a dispatcher, nine full-time fire fighters and twentyfive volunteers. Three full-time fire fighters are available at all
times at Station One. When a fire alarm is received the full time fire
fighters take the fire engines to the scene and the volunteers, who are
alerted by radio, respond to the scene.
In 1979 the voters of Delta Township approved a millage issue of onehalf mill for the operation of a paramedic unit within the Township.
A paramedic staff of three trained individuals now operates under the
direction of the Township Fire Chief. Presently one trained paramedic
is available at all times. A fully equipped ambulance was purchased
in 1979 which is utilized primarily for paramedic activities.
Service
Table CF-3 illustrates Fire Department responses and Township fire
losses for the period of 1975-1981. This table does not include such
departmental activities as building inspections and mutual aid requests.
TABLE CF-3
DELTA TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT
RESPONSES AND FIRE LOSSES
19 75-1981
1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

88

37

76
28
57

86
36
63

61
21
50

57
21
50

56
15
51

61
39
54

Vehicle Fires

39

41

49

48

30

32

37

Ambulance Assists

48

14

30

35

49

101

91

60
106
16
17

68
1
7
4

155
66
15
6

35
8
2
14

107
1.5
15
6

Fire Alarms
Single Family Dwellings
Multiple Family Dwellings
Businesses

*

Estimated Fire Losses (Thousand Dollars)
Single Family Dwellings
Multiple Family Dwellings
Businesses
Vehicles

97

*
3

6

*Totals for Multiple Family dwellings are included in the single family
dwelling column.
** Total 1981 estimated loss all categories -- breakdown unavailable.
172

117**

�Existing Facilities
Station One is located northwest of the intersection of Canal Road and
Saginaw Highway. The station consists of 3,700 square feet and occupies a
32,000 square foot site. The facility contains a kitchen, a living
room, and bedroom which are utilized by the full-time firemen. The
equipment which is housed at Station One includes two pumper trucks,
a ladder truck, a mini-pumper truck, a water tank truck, a compressor/
generator truck, two ambulances, the fire chief's car and a jeep which
which is utilized for grass fires.
Fire Station One is well located with respect to the proposed Township
development pattern. Access is available to both Canal Road and Saginaw Highway from Station One. The fact that the Station One site consists of less than three-quarters of an acre limits future building
expansion.
Station Two is located on the south side of Lansing Road immediately
south of Millett Highway. The station consists of 2,600 square feet
and occupies a 1.2 acre site. This facility is presently unmanned .
The equipment which is housed at Station Two consists of two pumper
trucks.
The location of Fire Station Two provides protection to that portion
of the Township lying between the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Tracks
and the south course of the Grand River. Host of this area is within
a one mile travel distance of Station Two . Apparatus stationed at
this facility occasionally experiences difficulty entering U.S. 27.
Traffic on the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Tracks impedes movement of
fire apparatus to the Township's industrial tract at crucial moments.
Fire Facility Location Criteria
The Insurance Services Office has developed criteria for the location
of fire stations. Locational criteria are based upon fire flow requirements for various types and densities of development. Fire flow
requirements are the minimum number of gallons of water per minute
(GPM) that would be required to extinguish fires. Fire flow requirements for most types of development range from a low of 500 GPM for
single family residences separated from other buildings by a distance
of 100 feet or more to a high of 12,000 GPM for very large, high hazard industrial facilities. Certain types of industrial or warehousing
facilities such as oil refineries or lumber yards might have fire flow
requirements in excess of 12,000 GPM.
Precise computation of fire flow requirements for various types of development is a complex procedure which involves an evaluation of many
details of building construction siting as well as on-site fire protection equipment. Generally, fire flow requirements increase in
direct proportion to increases in the intensity of land use.
In selecting fire station locations, consideration should be given to
access problems created by topographical and man-made barriers. In

173

�Delta Township, expressways and railroads form important man-made barriers
which will affect the effective deployment of fire fighting equipment.
The Grand River forms a natural barrier which will also affect the deployment of fire fighting equipment. I-96, 1-496 and the planned 1-69
expressways make it necessary to select fire station locations in close
proximity to the arterials which cross these expressways.
Proposed Fire Station Locations
Figure CF-I indicates the general location of the seven fire stations
proposed to serve the development pattern contained in the Future
Land Use Plan. Fire Stations Number One and Two are shown in the
same area in which they are presently located. Plans for the development of Fire Station Number Three are already underway. The Township
should acquire property at the other five locations as soon as practical to ensure the balanced distribution of facilities needed to provide a high level of fire protection. Construction of facilities
should be paced to coincide with Township development. Furthermore,
facilities should not be constructed absent assurances that the necessary personnel will exist to properly staff such facilities. The numbers which identify each of the following proposed facilities do not
indicate a priority for the construction of the fire stations.
Fire Station Number One
It is recommended that Fire Station One continue to operate at its
present location. Although the small size of the site limits expansion,
the location of this facility should provide excellent protection for
the Township Administration Building, the office areas located on Saginaw Highway east of Canal Road and the high density housing areas
located to the north and south of Saginaw Highway. This facility
should provide good secondary protection to the entire northern portion of the Township as well as to the southern portion of the
Township adjacent to Canal Road.
Fire Station Number 'l\.rn
It is recommended that Fire Station Two continue to operate at its
present location. The existing structure has been designed so that
it will accommodate a full range of modern facilities. Sufficient
room exists on this site to train firefighters and provide for building expansion. Fire Station Two should provide excellent protection
for the area between Lansing Road and the Grand River. This facility
will also provide a secondary means of fire protection for the eastern
portion of Delta Township's industrial tract.
Fire Station Number Three
Delta Township presently owns a one and one-half acre site on the north
side of Mt. Hope Highway, immediately west of the General Motors Parts
Warehouse, which is envisioned as a future fire station site. Providing improved fire protection to the industrial tract should be a high
Township priority. Fire Station Three will provide good protection to

174

~

r;:

�Q

w

en

0

-:cu,

C.

Cl.

0

a:
C.
Oen

z

~
0
I-

cc

-

zz
&lt;~

0

C!J&lt;
ZI-

LL

C,

-en

C

LL

WLL

w

cc
~
en
en
&gt;&lt;
UJ

enw

a,

~

z

...:::,

I-

0

I-

..J

Cl)

en
z

I-

-a:
&gt;&lt;-

~

•

en

z

0

~

cc
~
en
C

• 11

UJ

en

0
a.
0
a:
a.

0

I
I

\

I
\

I

\

\

\

\

\

\
\

\
\

\

\

\
\

\

\

\

'

\

\

\

\

\
\

\
\

I

I
II

''

'

' \

\

I

\

/
/

\

I

\

I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I

I I
I I
I I

I:

- ---· - -1-------+--------------I

Figure CF-I

Page 175

I

�the northeastern portion of Delta Township's industrial tract, most of
which would lie within a one mile travel distance. Good protection
would also be provided to the multi-family residential and commercial
development proposed for the area adjacent to the interchange of Creyts
Road and 1-496. Fire Station Three would provide secondary protection
to the low density residential areas between Michigan Avenue and I-496.
Fire Station Number Four
Delta Township presently owns seventeen acres of land on the east side
of Elmwood Road directly south of the Plum Hollow Subdivision. Only
a small portion of the site would be needed to accommodate Fire Station Four. A two acre alternative site is owned by the Township on the
west side of Elmwood Road immediately south of the St. David's Church
site and adjacent to Sharp Park. Either of these sites would provide
excellent protection for the Delta central business district, most of
which is located within a one mile travel distance. The sites would
also provide good protection for the strip commercial development on
Saginaw Highway east of the central business district. Station Four
would provide secondary protection to most of the northeast portion of
the Township.
Fire Station Number Five
It is proposed that Fire Station Five be located adjacent to Willow
Highway in close proximity to Looten's Park. Such a location would
allow Fire Station Five to provide good protection to the low density
housing areas located between Willow Highway and the Grand River.
Such a site would also provide good protection to the Hayes School
complex located at Nixon Road and Willow Highway. Fire Station Five
should provide good protection to most residential areas north of Saginaw Highway and west of I-96.
Fire Station Number Six
It is proposed that Fire Station Six be located near the intersection
of Nixon Road and St. Joe Highway. Such a location would provide good
protection to all single family residential areas located between Saginaw Highway and I-69. Fire Station Six woul&lt;l also provide good protection to the low density areas located south of the proposed I-69.
Fire Station Number Seven
It is proposed that Fire Station Seven be located in the vicinity of the
Canal Road/Millett Highway intersection. This location would place
most of the southwestern portion of the Township's industrial tract
within a one mile travel distance of Station Seven.

Fire Protection Deficiencies
While the indicated distribution of seven fire stations should provide
the Township with excellent fire protection, there are three primary
areas which are not ideally protected. The most important of these is
Delta Mills and the low density residential area penetrated by Delta

176

�River Drive. It is believed that development densities in this area
will not justify the provision of a fire station north of the Grand
River. The Delta Mills area will receive fire protection from Fire
Stations One and Four, both of which are approximately two miles in
travel distance. Other portions of the Township not ideally protected by the proposed fire station distribution are the extreme northwest corner which is cut off from the rest of the Township by the
Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad tracks, and the extreme southeast portion of the Township isolated by the Grand River. Existing mutual
aid agreements with neighboring fire departments will assist in providing adequate fire protection to these isolated areas.
IV

Library Facilities
With an expanding population, growth in leisure time and an emphasis
on continuing education, the importance of the public library is increasing. The concept of the library as a facility to serve children
or scholars is no longer valid. Libraries are now widely recognized
as a source of information for both laymen and professionals.
Existing Library Facilities
Prior to 1975, library services were provided to residents in the
eastern portion of the Township via an Ingham County Branch Library
in the Windemere Park School within Lansing Township. Residents residing in the western portion of the Township were served by the
Grand Ledge Public Library. In January of 1975, the Waverly Branch
of the Ingham County Library District was established in the former
Bretton Woods School. This facility is located northwest of the
intersection of Robins Road and Elizabeth Road. The Library presently houses approximately 25,000 volumes and has access to more than
100,000 volumes in the Ingham County System.
During 1981 and 1982, extensive remodeling of the Waverly Branch Library
was undertaken. An expenditure of $80,000 for renovations included
demolition of the 4,400 square foot west wing of the former Bretton
Woods Elementary School, enclosure of an open corridor connecting the
northern and southern portions of the building, removal of a number of
windows and replacement with solid walls, installation of eight new
parking spaces on the site and resurfacing of the existing parking lot,
and extensive interior painting and remodeling. At this time it is
assumed that the remodeled Waverly Branch Library will adequately serve
the Township's library needs through the 199O's.
Delta Township presently contracts for library services from Ingham
County. Penal fines, which primarily consist of traffic fines, are
utilized to defray some of the costs of library services. Financial
support for the Waverly Branch Library is provided primarily by Delta
Township with Lansing Township also contributing a small portion.
The use of the Waverly Branch Library has significantly increased
during the past several years. Circulation of books has continually
increased to the point where approximately 2,500 books per week are
presently checked out.

177

�((

(\

0
. . .,. . . ~~·· ~'!)

DELTA

,,f!,•······

TOWNSHIP

Figure CF·II
EXISTING SCHOOL
FACILITIES
SCHOOL DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES

0

EXISTING FACILITIES

CX)

r-....-1
Q)

1 Hayes Middle &amp;
Elementary School
2 Elmwood Elementary
3 Delta Center
Elementary
4 Colt Elementary
5 Winans Elementary
6 Waverly High
7 Waverly West
Junior High
8 Waverly School
Admi nist rat i o n

GRAtD LEDGE
SCHOL
DIST ICT

/
/
/

/ ✓✓::✓ /,,,,.✓

,,,,,,,,

L

//

/✓-1·----//
I

' , ' J //
/

r

/

/

., "

/

/

!

I.!
J

r. . . . . . . . . . .
:

I
i

CITY OF
LANSING

NORTH

;;---

.. ___ --··--

. . RICT
1

~
p..,
H

~
µ.

u
~
~
~

�Township residents are also presently served by the Grand Ledge Public
Library and the Lansing Public Library. The Grand Ledge Library is
located on Jefferson Street in Grand Ledge and the Lansing Library is
located on South Capitol Avenue in Lansing.
V School Facilities
Delta Township is served by four school districts as illustrated in
Figure CF-II. The Grand Ledge and Waverly School Districts serve the
major portion of the Township while the Lansing and Holt School Districts serve relatively small areas.
Grand Ledge School Facilities
The Grand Ledge School District, which serves the western portion of
Delta Township, encompasses a large, primarily rural, service area.
The district covers approximately 125 square miles distributed over
several townships and three counties. Providing service to students
distributed over such a large area necessitates daily bus runs of
approximately 3,500 miles. Because of the extensive bussing necessitated by the size and population density of the district, school
attendance areas have not been rigidly delineated. Instead, bussing
has been utilized as a flexible tool which allows balanced classroom
sizes throughout the school district.
TABLE CF-4
ENROLLMENT IN THE GRAND LEDGE
PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
1971-1981
Year
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976

Enrollment
5,646
5,766
5,929
5,995
5,978
5,884

Year

Enrollment

1977
1978
1979
1980
1981

5,838
5,711
5,652
5, L18 l
5,220

Table CF-4 illustrates student enrollment trends in the Grand Ledge
School District for the 1971-1981 period. Student enrollments increased
annually from 1971 until they peaked in 1974 after which time they have
annually declined.
Waverly School Facilities
The Waverly School District, which covers the eastern portion of Delta
Township, serves a primarily suburban service area. The entire district
covers approximately 22 square miles, more than two-thirds of which is

179

�located in Lansing and Delta Townships and the remainder of which is
distributed between Watertown and Windsor Townships. The school district bus runs cover approximately 840 miles a day. The school district has attempted to develop a pattern of neighborhood schools where
practical and to rely on bussing where rural densities exist.
Table CF-5 illustrates student enrollment trends in the Waverly School
District for the 1971-1981 period. Student enrollments declined annually
throughout this ten year period.
TABLE CF-5
ENROLLMENT IN THE WAVERLY
PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
1971-1981
Year

Enrollment

Year

Enrollment

1971
1972
19 73
1974
1975
1976

5,047
4,884
4,753
4,614
4,454
4,332

1977
1978
1979
1980
1981

4,142
4,079
3,852
3,650
3,539

Waverly School District facilities located in Delta Township serve Delta
Township students as well as students located in other portions of the
District. Further, some Delta Township students are served by facilities
located in Lansing Township. The Waverly High School serves all district high school students. The Waverly East Junior High School, located in Lansing Township, serves all 6th and 7th graders. The three
Waverly elementary schools located in Delta Township serve primarily
Delta Township residents. Delta Township residents are also served by
elementary schools located in the Lansing To\mship portion of the school
district.

180

�Projected Student Enrollments
Since the Comprehensive Plan affects population densities, housing types,
the staging of development and the installation of public improvements,
it influences the need for schools. The quality of local school systems
is often an important factor considered by prospective residents.
Several factors including student enrollment trends and birthrate data
were analyzed in order to project future student enrollment in the
Waverly and Grand Ledge School Districts. The student enrollment
projection methodology which was utilized is summarized below:
1. Cohort survival rates are the relationships between the number of
children in each grade level in a certain year and the number of
children in the next higher grade the following year. Calculations of the cohort survival rates between all grades within the
two school districts was done for a ten year period beginning with
the 1972 first grade class/1973 second grade class and ending i1ith
the 1980 kindergarten class/1981 first grade class. In the 54
class changes which took place during this period, the Grand Ledge
Schools averaged a .26 percent decrease in individual class sizes
from year to year. During this same period the Waverly Schools
average.d a 1.23 percent decrease in individual class sizes from
year to year. Thus, if the aforementioned trends continue, class
sizes will decrease as they progress through the school system.
2. Beginning with the year 1982, actual kindergarten class enrollment
figures had to be estimated. At the suggestion of demographers from
Uichigan State University, a methodology was established to determine
what percentage of county births end up in the Waverly and Grand
Ledge kindergarten classes five years later. A review of the ten
year period between 1967 and 1976 revealed that 34.57 percent of the
Eaton County births were enrolled as Grand Ledge kindergarten students
while 23.57 percent of the births were enrolled as Waverly kindergarten students. It should also be noted that during this same period,
5.63 percent of the Ingham County births were enrolled as Waverly
kindergarten students five years later. The annual county births for
the 19 7 7-1980 period were then applied to the aforementioned percentages to arrive at projected kindergarten classes for the 1982-1985
period. The year to year class declines were then applied to the
1981 Waverly and Grand Ledge classes, being .26 percent and 1.23 percent respectively, to determine how many juniors will be in the 1983
senior class and what survival rates would be for the eleven other
classes. Use of the above methodology revealed total student enrollments through the 1985-1986 school year.
Based on utilization of the cohort survival method, it is projected that
student enrollments for the Grand Ledge and Waverly Schools will continue
to decline during the 1982-1985 period. Thus, projected enrollments
can be adequately accommodated within the existing schools and there
will be no need for additional physical facilities to be constructed
during the 1982-1985 period. It appears the most significant
problems will be responding to the enrollment declines via the
closure of school facilities, the reduction of staffs, the passage of

181

�millage issues and the curtailments in financial assistance from the
State of Michigan.
A number of evolving trends and general factors became apparent during
formulation of the student enrollment projections. These items are
noted below:
1. The Eaton County birthrate declined annually from 1971 to 1975
but has increased annually from 1977 to 1980. Such fluctuations
in the birthrate make it difficult to accurately ·predict future
kindergarten class sizes. The Comprehensive Plan's enrollment
projections for the 1982-1985 period utilize actual birthrate
information rather than relying on estimations of future county
births.
2. The methodology which has been utilized only provides enrollment
projections through the year 1985 thus, it is recommended that
periodic updates and revisions to the plan include school enrollment projections in order to determine the possible need for
new school facilities.
3. Total enrollment in the Grand Ledge Schools increased every year
from 1969 to 1974. Beginning in 1975 enrollment decreased every
year from 1975 to 1981. During the 1975-1981 period the district
experienced an annual decrease of 2.74 percent in enrollment.
4. Total enrollment in the Waverly Schools decreased every year from
1971 to 1981. The school district experienced an annual decline
of 3.47 percent during the 1971 to 1981 period and more importantly,
a 4.61 percent annual decline during the 1978 to 1981 period.
5. Both the Waverly and Grand Ledge School Districts currently have
underutilized buildings within their systems. Thus, both districts could accommodate some enrollment increases without a corresponding need to construct new physical facilities.
6. Factors such as the availability of public utilities and roads, the
cost of construction, major variations in the economy and mobility
of population significantly impact residential development in the
Township which in turn impacts future school enrollments.
7. When reviewing requests for large residential developments, Township decision makers should obtain information such as the size,
number and type of dwellings in order to ascertain the impact of such
developments on local school districts. Indications of the phasing of residential projects should also be required in order to
determine the quantitative impacts of several developments over
time.

182

��IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

In order for the Comprehensive Plan to serve as an effective guide to the
development of Delta Township, it must be implemented. The Delta Township Board of Trustees in conjunction with the Planning Commission and
Township staff utilize a number of methods to effect implementation of
the Plan. These methods include ordinances, programs, and administrative
procedures which are described in the following paragraphs.
I

Zoning Ordinance
Zoning represents a legal means for the Township to regulate private
property to achieve orderly land-use relationships. The zoning process
consists of an official zoning map and a zoning ordinance text. The
present Delta Township Zoning Ordinance (No. 239) and official Zoning
map were adopted in September of 1974 under authority of Michigan Act
184 of 1944, Act 285 of 1931 and Act 359 of 1947. Several zoning ordinances for Delta Township have previously been adopted by the Township
Board of Trustees. The effective dates of these prior adopted zoning
ordinances are July 18, 1946, February 11, 1952 and April 8, 1970.
The official Zoning Map sets forth zones or districts within which certain uses are permitted and certain others are not. The Zoning Ordinance
Text notes what uses are permitted in each zone and establishes the minimum development standards. Both the Zoning Ordinance text and official
Map are based upon the 1973 Comprehensive Plan and should be revised to
reflect any amendments to the adopted Comprehensive Plan. The Zoning
Administrator is charged with administration of the Zoning Ordinance.

II

Subdivision Ordinance
The Delta Township Subdivision Regulations, Ordinance No. 219, was adopted by the Delta Township Board of Trustees in August of 1973 under authority of Michigan Act 288 of 1967 being the Subdivision Control Act which
is commonly referred to as the "Plat Act." The Subdivision Regulations
set forth requirements and procedures which control the subdivision of
vacant land for development purposes. The Regulations also establish
minimum design standards for lo-t identification, street, utility, lighting, and landscaping installation and also procedures for the preparation and filing of plats. The Township Board of Trustees and the Planning Commission are involved in reviewing subdivision plats. The Engineering and Planning Departments are responsible for administering the
Subdivision Regulations.

III

•

Sign Ordinance
The Delta Township Sign Ordinance was adopted in 1974 under Michigan Act
359 of 1947 and has been amended a number of times since then. The Sign
Ordinance regulates the size, placement and character of signs and billboards within the Township. The Ordinance also establishes permit requirements and fee structures. The Township Building Official administers the
Ordinance .

183

r

�IV

Capital Improvements Program
The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for Delta Township is prepared
annually by the Planning Commission for a six-year period and is prepared pursuant to Michigan Act 285 of 1931. The implementation of the
Comprehensive Plan is closely tied to the CIP. The Comprehensive Plan
establishes the desired future land use pattern for the Township and
anticipates the needs of people for public improvements while the CIP
provides a program to meet those needs. The program describes public
improvement needs of the Township, the estimated costs of these improvements and develops logical priorities for their provision. The
CIP is supplemented by a capital improvements budget which covers the
first year of the Capital Improvements Program and focuses upon the
current operating budget in the expenditure of funds.
Both the CIP anu the capital improvements budget represent sound planning and management techniques which improve the efficiency and economy
of government. These techniques establish a budget cycle which addresses
the future expenditure of funds for public services in advance of the
need for these services.

V Administrative Procedures
Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan w_ill be aided by administrative
procedures of the Planning and Building Departments to process all rezoning petitions, variance appeals, conditional use permit applications
and building and sign permits. In addition, procedures have been adopted
which coordinate and expedite departmental review of building site plans
so these plans will comply with all Township Ordinance requirements.
Both the Planning and Building Departments periodically review their respective ordinances and make recommendations to the Board for revisions
as changing Township conditions warrant.
VI

Program Coordination
Delta Township is involved with other local municipalities and several
state agencies to coordinate programs relating to community development
and public services. Coordination of these programs allows for exchange
of information between agencies and fosters a regional approach to plan
implementation. Delta Township is a member of several committees sponsored by the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission. One of these
committees is the Capital Area Regional Transportation Study (CARTS)
which addresses a variety of transportation related matters. Other
committees are the Bicycle Transportation Planning Committee and the
Task Force on Housing.

VII

Federal and State Grants-In-Aid
The Comprehensive Plan cannot be successfully implemented unless appropriate funding is available. For this reason the Township Board, Planning Commission, and departmental supervisors should pursue federal and
state matching grants or revenue sharing monies to supplement the funding of implementation procedures.

184

�VIII

•

Economic Development Corporation
In 1976 the Delta Township Board of Trustees created the Delta Township
Economic Development Corporation (EDC) under Michigan Act 338 of 1974.
The EDC is responsible for promoting the development of commercial, industrial, and office facilities within the Township through tax exempt
bond financing for construction of these facilities. The EDC process
is coordinated with the land use development pattern recommended by the
Comprehensive Plan.

IX

Planning Advisory Services
The Township's Planning Department should provide day-to-day assistance
to property owners and residents of the Township and to land developers
in interpreting the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and in working
out detailed solutions to specific land development problems.

X Mapped Improvements Ordinances

•

The Mapped Improvements Act of 1943 enables the Township Planning Commission, in cooperation with the Board of Trustees, to adopt detailed descriptive maps identifying specific public improvements anticipated on a
short-range, five to seven year period. Included in the Mapped Improvements Ordinance are streets, parks and other public use facilities which
are anticipated. The Township Board, upon reconnnendation of the Planning Commission, may provide for a building moratorium for the areas
specifically identified. Whenever issues arise which may have major impact
on a particular area or group of persons, the Planning Commission should
make every effort to fully inform and discuss the issue in open forum .
XI

Public Information Services
The Township Planning Commission, assisted by its Planning Department,
should maintain an up-to-date Township informational file. This information can be disseminated to realtors, developers, market firms, the news
media and other interested parties. The Planning Department staff should
also be available for public speaking engagements to explain and promote
the planning activities of the Township.

XII

Revisions to the Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan should be reviewed on an annual basis and revised
as necessary. It is suggested that the review of the_ plan be included as
a component of the Planning Commission's annual report which is prepared
in April of each year. At a minimum the review should include an examination of rezoning actions, the cumulative effect of such items as utility
extensi ~ and new road construction and evolving trends in land development. An updating of population projections, existing land use information and data relating to the commercial and industrial base analysis
should also be conducted •

•

•
185

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007632">
                <text>Delta-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan-Amendments_1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007633">
                <text>Delta Township Planning Commission, Eaton County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007634">
                <text>1983-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007635">
                <text>1983 Amendments</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007636">
                <text>The 1983 Amendments were prepared by the Delta Township Planning Commission as part of the Delta Township Comprehensive Plan in April 1983.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007637">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007638">
                <text>Delta Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007639">
                <text>Eaton County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007640">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007642">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007643">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007644">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007645">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038282">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54658" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58929">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/98e34f553c5f7c10d02dac5acec16090.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d2d5713de5764c256a577d590607f6a4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1007661">
                    <text>1/

FROM THE LIBRARY OF
·Planning &amp; zoning Center, Inc.

,
/

r"i .

I

/

/

THE
DELTA
TOWNSHIP
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
1984 REVISIONS

prepared by:
DELTA TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSJO~
7710 WEST SAGINAW HIGHWAY
LANSING , MICHIGAN 48917

�1984 Revisions
Delta Township Comprehensive Plan
Adopted December 10, 1984
Attached are the 1984 revisions to the Delta
Township
Comprehensive Plan which were adopted by the Delta Township
Planning Commission on December 10, 1984 following a public
hearing.
The Plan, which was originally adopted on July 12,
1982, was also revised on April 11, 1983.
The present plan
replaced
the
Township's first Comprehensive Plan which was
adopted in July of 1973.
The following
revisions:

summary notes the most significant of the 1984

1. The existing land use map (Figure GD-III on page 23) was
reviewed on a section by section basis and updated as needed.
The corresponding existing land use chart (Table GD-1 on page
21) was also revised.
2. The population information contained in the chapter entitled
Population Analysis and Projections was revised based on new
data
from
the
1980 U.S. Census as well as population
projections prepared by the Tri-County
Regional
Planning
Commission in June of 1984.
3. The Commercial Base Analysis Chapter was completely rewritten
based on new inputs pertaining to population, median incomes,
per
capita
spending
patterns
and
projected
retail
expenditures.
4. The maps illustrating the
existing
water
and
sanitary
sewer systems (Figure WI on page 91 and Figure SSI on page 99)
were revised to illustrate recent extensions.
Modifications
were also made to the maps depicting projected water and
sanitary sewer service areas.
5. Minor revisions were made to the descriptions of the various
neighborhoods in the Township which are contained in the
Future Land Use Chapter.
6. A number of amendments were made to the Future Land Use Map,
the most prominent being the expansion of the retail trade
classification at the southwest corner of the Mall Drive
South/M-43 intersection, the establishment of a high density
residential classification at the northwest corner of the Mall
Drive South/Michigan intersection and the expansion of the
retail trade classification at the northwest corner of the
Creyts/M-43 intersection further to the west.
Any questions concerning the Delta Township Comprehensive
Plan should be directed to the Delta Township Planning Department
at 627-4037.

�-

This page revised Dec. of 1984

DELTA TOWNSHIP
PLANNING COMMISSION
July, 1982

DELTA TOWNSHIP
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
July, 1982

Ronald Ratajczak
Chairman

Joseph E. Drolett
Super.visor

Terry G. Bladen
Vice Chairman

Barbara Barrett
Clerk

June Johnston
Secretary

Robert Richards
Treasurer

Ronald Brabant
Member

Lyle Brown
Trustee

Barbara Israel
Member

Philip Chisholm
Trustee

Edward Jaye
Member

Daniel Stump
Trustee

Robert LaMoreaux
Member

Gerald Winans
Trustee

Janice' Vedder
Member
Jerome Wittkoski
Member

The Comprehensive Plan for the Charter Township of Delta has
been prepared pursuant to Act 285 of 1938, the "Hunicipal
Planning Commission Act," and became effective on July 12,
1982 by unanimous approval of the Charter Township of Delta
Planning Commission.
This plan was revised on April 11, 1983 and December 10, 1984

�-

This page was revised Dec. of 1984
.,

CONTENTS
PAGE
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

I.
II.
III.

IV.

v.

VI.
VII.
IX.
VIII.

1

Community Goals • • .
Residential Development.
Commercial Development •
Industrial Development . • . • . .
Community Facilities and Services.
Transportation Facilities Development . .
Open Space and Recreation Facilities Development.
Energy . . . . .
The Environment.

1
2
3
4

5
6
8
9

10

GEOGRAPHIC DETERMINANTS . .
I.
II.
III.

IV.

v.

VI.
VII.

IX.
VIII.

12

Location of Delta Township.
Historical Growth of Delta Township • .
Climate. . . • . • . • . .
Geology and Topography . . • . . . •
Soil Conditions in Delta Township . .
Ground Water • • . . • .
Surface Water. . . . . .
. ...
Existing Land Use Pattern. . .
. •••
Delta Township Land Use Trends (1972-1980)

12
12
14
15
16
17
17
19
19

POPULATION ANALYSIS AND PROJECTIONS.
I.
II.

24

Population Growth in Delta Township . •
Population Projections .

. . . .

COMMERCIAL BASE ANALYSIS . .
I.
II.
III.

34

Characteristics of Existing Commercial Development
Projection of Future Commercial Development . .
Major Findings of the Commercial Base Analysis • .

34
36
51

INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS
I.
II.
III.

52

Analysis of Delta Township's Existing Industrial Base.
Projection of Future Industrial Development
Potential
Conclusions • .

Office Types in Delta Township
Office Development Trends . . . .
Determination of Delta Township Office Space
Market .

. .

52
55
60

....

OFFICE SPACE ANALYSIS.
I.
II.
III.

.

24
32

. .

.

. .

o

•

•

ii

•

•

•

61
61
61
64

�This page was revised April of 1983
Dec. of 1984

PAGE
TRANSPORTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . •

66

Historical Development of the Street System.............
Functional Classification of Existing Street System.....
Truck Operation Classifications.........................
Jurisdiction Over Delta Township Roads..................
Financing of Road Improvements..........................
State Trunk Lines . . . . . . . . . . • . . • • • . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . • . .
County Primaries and Locals.............................
Financing Prerogatives..................................
Thoroughfare Cross Sections.............................
Right-of-Way Deficiencies...................... . . . . . . . . .
Mass Transit Service in Delta Township..................
Railroad Facilities Serving Delta Township..............
Air Service to Del ta Township. . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . .
Non-Motorized Transportation. . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . . . . . • • . . • . .

66
66

I.
II.
III.

IV.

v.

VI.

VII.
VIII.
IX.

x.

XI.

XII.
XIII.
XIV.

WATER SERVICE . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I.
II.
III.

72
72
74

74
74

76
76
76

84
85
87

88
90

Historical Information. . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Description of Existing Water Service System ............
Future Service Area.....................................

90
90
96

SANITARY SEWER SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98

Historical Information..................................
Description of Existing Sanitary Sewer Collection
and Treatment Facilities................................
Future Service Areas for the Wastewater Collection
and Treatment System....................................

98

I.
II.

III.

102
102

STORM DRAINAGE •.••••.••.......•....•...•.•.•.•.. : . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . .

109

Storm Water Design Criteria.............................
Inventory of Existing Storm Drainage Facilities .........
New Storm Drainage Practices............................
Recommended Storm Drainage Practices ....................

109
109
111

I.

II.
III.

IV.

SOLID WASTE
FUTURE LAND

I.
II.
III.

IV.

v.

VI.
VII.

VIII.
IX.

x.

112
114

USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Relationship of Planning to Zoning ..................
Residential Development .................................
Residential Neighborhood Module Concept ...•.............
Neighborhood Unit Delineation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office Development......................................
Commercial Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial Development ..................................
Parks, Open Space and Recreation Facilities
Development.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proposed Thoroughfare Improvements .................... • .
Community Facilities....................................
iii

118
118

120

123
12 4
150

152
157
158

161
161

~,

�PAGE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES . . . . • . . • . . . . • . . • . . . • . . • • . • . • . . • . • . . • • . • • • . .

169

Governmental Offices and Departments; .....•..•••.....•
Police Protection •..••.••••.•..••.•.•••........•••.•••
Fire Protection ••••••••••••.••••••..•••...•...•.•....•
Library Facilities ••••..•.•.••••....•.•••...•.....••.•
School Facilities •••......••••..••.••••.•.•....••.••••

169
169
179

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN........................

183

Zoning Ordinance ••.••.......•••......•....•..•.•.•••.•
Subdivision Ordinance •..•..•..•.....••....•.•...••••••
Sign Ordinance ...•.••••.•••••••••...•.••..•..•••.•••.•
Capital Improvement Program •..••••..••...•..••...•••••
Adminis tra tive Procedures .•..••.•.••••..•...•••..••..•
Program Coordination •.•••••.•.•••.•••.....•••.....••••
Federal and State Grants-In-Aide •..•.••..•..•.•••.•••.
Economic Development Corporation ••...•....•..•.••••..•
Planning Advisory Services ••..•.•......•.............•
Mapped Improvements Ordinances ••...••........••..••.•.
Public Information Services .....•••..•.......•..•••.••
Revisions to the Comprehensive Plan •••••••••••••••••.•

183
183
183
184
184
184
184
185
185
185
185
185

I.

II.
III.

IV.

v.

I.

II.
III.

IV.

v.

VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.

x.

XI.
XII.

iv

172
177

�TABLES
Table
GD-1
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
I-1
I-2
I-3
I-4
I-5
0-1
0-2
0-3
0-4

r-

T-1
T-2
T-3
T-4
T-5
T-6
W-1
W-2
W-3
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3

Title

Page

Existing Land Use, 1980-1984 Comparison •.•.••••......•..•••••......•••
Comparative Population Trends .••.• ••••• .•• •.• •.••••• •..•• •• ••..•••.• . .
Incremental Population Increases .•...••••••••......••.•••••.•.•.•••.••
Population Age Groups, Del ta Township ••..••••••••.••.•••.•.•...•.•.•..
Population Per Household, Delta Township, 1960-1980 •.•.•..•..•..••••••
Population Projections to the Year 2000 •....•..•.•••.•.••...•.....•.•.
Five Mile Trade Area Population Projections •..••......•.•..•••.•..•••.
Year 2000 Tri-County Projected Per Capita
Retail Expenditure Patterns •..••........•..••......•..•......•...
Year 2000 Projected Trade Area Retail Expenditures .... ....... ...•.....
Neighborhood and Regional Shopping Centers within
the Tri-County Area .•..•.•.•...••.••••...••.••.•..•••••....••••••
Proportion of Total Trade Area Retail Expenditures
Accruing to the Delta Central Business District
in the Year 2000 •...•.••...••.••.........••........••••...•.•••.•
Retail Floor Space Required to Serve Year 2000 Retail
Expenditure Patterns .•..•••..............••.......•.•.•.•.•......

21

Comparison of 1984 and Year 2000 Required Shopping _ Facilities •.....•••
Major Business Establishment Located in Delta
Township's Indus trial Tract •............•...•.....•.•........•..•
Tri-County Region Employment Changes •...••.....•....•..••.••••...••••.
Projections of Manufacturing and Wholesale Employment
in the Tri-County Area ........•.••......•..•...•..•.•...•..•.•.•.
Projections of Manufacturing and Wholesale Employment
in the Delta Industrial Tract ........... ..•....•• .••.•...........
Projected Land Consumption for Manufacturing and
Wholesale Activities in the Delta Industrial Tract ...•.•....••.•.
Distribution of Office Buildings - 1977 Lansing
Metropolitan Area ••...•.................••...•••.....•....•......
Office Construction Activity by Governmental
Unit 1971 - 1977 ........••••.•.•...•......•....•..........••.••••
Acreage and Floor Space Devoted to Office Uses
Del ta Township 1966 .;. 1980 ..••....•......................••.....•
Projected Office Land Development and Projected Office
Floor Space Requirements Delta Township 1981 - 2000 .•........•..
Functional Classification of Highways-Metropolitan Areas ...........•..
Delta Township Road Mileage by Functional Classification ...•• ..• ......
Planning Impacts on Roadways ...•......................................
Unique Del ta Township Features ...•....................................
EATRAN Ridership ••..•..........•...•........................•... . ...••
Passenger Activity Capital City Airport ...••....•............•.......•
Existing Water Wells, Delta Township ...... ...•...••.. .....•.•... .. •...
Delta Township Water Consumption •.•.•....•.........••............•..•.
Recommended Fire Flows .•.•.....•.................•.......•...•........
Sanitary Sewer Assessment Districts .....•......•.••.•.....••........•.
Sanitary Sewer Customers 1975 - 1983 ..•. .•....•......•...••......... •.
Projected Sanitary Sewer Connections and Land
Acreage Consumption 1985 - 2000 .•...•.•.......•.........•..•.....

49

V

26
26
30a
31
32
40
42
44
46

47
48

54a
57
58
58
59
62
63
63
64
69
70
71
72

84
87a
93
94
95
100
103
103

�TABLES (continued)
Table
SS-4
SW-1
SW-2
LU-1
LU-2

CF-1
CF-2
CF-3
CF-4
CF-5

Title
Wastewater Flow Projections at the Delta
Township WWTP 1985 - 2000 ...•...................•............••
Estimated Solid Waste Generation
Eaton County, 19 80 ........•......•........•.......•.•••.....••.
Estimated Solid Waste Generation
Delta Township, 1980 - 2000 ............................•..•....
Future Land Use •.......••...••...•.•........•...........••.....•.•••
Proposed Road Improvements ....•......................•...•.........•
Inventory of Major Delta Township Buildings .......................•.
Delta Patrol Division Activities 1975 - 1981. ......•...•..•.....•...
Delta Township Fire Department Responses and
Fire Losses 1975 - 1981 ..................................... , •.
Enrollment in the Grand Ledge Public School System .........•......••
Enrollment in the Waverly Public School System •.......•...........••

vi

Page
104

114
115
119

163
170
170
172

179
180

�FIGURES
Figure

Title

GD-I
GD-II
GD-III
P-I
P-II
P-III
P-IV
P-V
C-I

Location of Delta Township in the TriCounty Region •.•••...•.. . . • ..
Soil Associations •••••.••••.•• • ••.••.•••••••••••••••.••.•• • • • • • •.•
Existing Land Use Map ••.••••.....•.••••.••.••••••..••.•••.....•.••
Location of Comparative Geographic Areas •..•••. • .••.....••.•••.•••
Comparative Population Trends ••.. • ••••. .• .....•...•••.••.. . .•...•.
Population Distribution Five Township Area 1960 - 1980 • . .•..• • .••.
Age-Sex Pyramids •..•..•... • ..•.•••• • • • .•.•.........•.• . .•••... . ••.
Delta Township Population, 1930 - Year 2000 .......•......••..•...
Five Mile Trade Area Delta Township Central
Business District ........•........•...•.•• • . . . • .. • . • •. •• •.••.
Delta Township Industrial Tract ..•.•• • .•...•.•.•..• • •...••..• • ....
MDOT Functional Highways Classification ... •.. .•....•..••..••..••.•
Truck Operation Classifications .•••.•.•... • .••••••••..•••.•.•.••.•
Road Classifications for Financing Purposes .•...... . .••.•••.•••.••
Expressway Cross-Section •..•••..•..•.• • •..•••...•...•••••..•.•••.•
Cross-Section of Arterial Road with Boulevard ....•....••...•••..••
Cross-Section of Two Way Arterial Street .•..•...••..•.•.....•...•.
Cross-Section of Collector Street .........•.•.••.•.•••...•.•••••..
Cross-Section of Local Street ...........•.••....•.......•. • •••.•••
Road Right-of-way Deficiencies ••.......•..•.....••.•.••..•••.••••.
Existing Water Service Area ( 1984) ......••......•.••.•••••.•....••
Existing and Proposed Water Service Area (1984) .......•...•..••••.
Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Area (1984) •.•.•.•.... • ••.••..••.•
Existing and Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Area (1984) •.••.••.••
Existing Storm Drains ( 1980) •..•. . •..••.••......•••.••••• . ••••..••
Generalized Future Land Use Plan •...•...••....... . See binder pouch
Delineated Neighborhood Uni ts •.•......•.•......•.••..•.••.•••..••.
Parks and Green Bel ts ••......•...•.........•.•.•....••...•...••.•.
Proposed Street and Highway Projects •........•..•....•....•.••.•••
Existing and Proposed Fire Stations •.....................•.•...••.
Existing School Facilities ••.........•.•.....•......•....••.. • ..•.

I-I
T-I
T-II
T-III
T-IV
T-V
T-VI
T-VII
T-VIII
T-IX
W-I

w-II
SS-I
SS-II
SD-I

LU-I
LU-II
LU-III
LU-IV
CF-I
CF-II

vii

Page
13
18
23
25
27
28
30
33a

37a
53
68

73
75
78
79
80
81
82
83
91
97
99
106
110

125
159
162
175
178

�~

~

~

DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure GD·II
SOIL ASSOCIATIONS

D Marlette· Capac: Nearly

level
lo genlly undulating, well drained
lo aomewhat poorly drained, loamy
10111 on 1111 plain,.

[]) Houghton-Gilford-Adrian:
Naarly leval, very poorly drained,
mucky and loamy 10111 In glacial
drainage ways.

'-.::I
f-'•
OQ

i::

ti
(1)

I

D

g

Marlette-Capac -Owosso:
Nearly level lo hilly, well drained
lo somewhat poorly drained, loamy
10111 on moraines and 1111 plains.

I

H

H

'd
Pl

D

OQ
(1)

.....

(X)

,.
,. ,. ,.

gently undulating, somewhat
poorly drained, loamy 10111 and
nearly level, poorly drained and
very poorly drained , loamy 10111;
on 1111 plains and low moraines.

,.

,,✓ ::&gt;/
L_ .,

/

, / ,. ,.

,,-

/

/
I
I

I
/

Capac - Parkhill: Nearly level to

.,,'

./(\)'

_ .. -

100 Year Flood Plain

/~--)

;.

iii

�l

This page revised Dec. of 1984
in the southwest portion of the Township is southwesterly toward the
Thornapple River.
Delta Township's watercourses, particularly the Grand River and the
Carrier Creek present an excellent potential for the development of
recreational facilities and high value residential areas. To realize
this potential, the problems of flooding and water pollution must be
addressed. Water pollution is primarily a regional problem, the resolution of which Delta Township can promote by taking a lead in implementing
high standards of wastewater treatment. Flooding is also a regional
problem which Delta Township can best help solve by prohibiting development -within the natural flood plains. Figure GD-II illustrates the
general location of the one hundred year flood plain within Delta
Township.
VIII

Existing Land Use Pattern
Delta Township may be characterized as a community experiencing a major
change in personality. The emerging land use pattern suggests the
community is developing an independent economic base, major comparison
shopping facilities, and a wide variety of housing types. No longer a
sparsely developed, surburban bedroom community, the 1980 land use survey
reveals that vacant land in Delta Township is being converted to urban
uses at the rate of over one hundred acres per year. During the 19721980 period twenty one new subdivis-ions were platted, four apartment
projects were constructed, and three condominium developments were constructed. Major commercial and office uses developed during the 19721980 period including the Waverly Plaza, additions to the Lansing Mall,
Auto Owners Insurance Company headquarters and the Hilton Inn. Major
new industrial-warehouse uses include Oldsmobile Plant Number Five, the
Meijer Distribution Center, General Motors Parts Warehouse addition,
Central Transport, Blue Arrow Trucking, Interstate and Associated Motor
Freight Companies, Lansing Storage Company, Flint Pipe and Well Supply
Company, Clark Foundation, the Detroit News, Shreve Steel and Coca-Cola.
Figure GD-III presents the spatial distributio~ of the existing land use
pattern. A comparision of Figure GD-III with its 1972 counterpart on
page 23 of the 1973 Comprehensive Plan provides the reader with insight
regarding the extent of land development in the Township in the 19721984 period.

IX

Delta Township Land Use Trends:

1972 - 1984

Delta Township's land use pattern can be characterized as being in a
dramatic state of change. Since the 1972 land use survey was conducted
as background for the 1973 Comprehensive Plan, approximately 1,000 acres
of land has been converted from an agricultural or vacant classification
to urban uses. Table GD-1 illustrates the change in the 1972-1984 period
which has taken place as to the land use pattern.

19

~

�BLANK PAGE

20

�(

This page revised Dec. of 1984

7ABLE GD-1
EXISTING LAND USE
1980-1984 COMPARISON
1980
Acreage

Percent
of Total

1984
Acreage

Percent
of Total

Single Family*
Two Family
Multiple Family

3152
29
162

14.01%
.13%
. 72%

3389
35
251

15. 06%
.16%
1.11%

Office
Commercial Retail
Commercial Services
Warehousing
Industrial
Utilities/Transportation

65
211
12 7
347
66
2334

.29%
.94%
.56%
1.54%
.29%
10.37%

97
280
164
487
157
2411

.43%
1.24%
.73%
2.16%
.70%
10. 71%

Public/Semi-Public Lands
Parks/Open Space

486
533

2 .16%
2.37%

465
557

2.07%
2.48%

8076
335
6582

35. 89%
1.49%
29.25%

7712
335
6165

34.27%
1.49%
27.39%

Residential

Agriculture
Water Areas
Vacant Lands

22,505

22,505**

*Single family homes on large parcels were assumed to have two acres devoted
to residential uses and the remainder devoted to agriculture or classified
as vacant.
**This figure does not include approximately 450 acres of City of Lansing
land located in Delta Township.

21

�This page was revised Dec. of 1984
Nearly all of the new land development in Delta Township during this
period occured east of I-96, and, excepting industrial and warehouse
uses, north of I-496. This is explained due to the provision of sanitary sewer, public water, and urban storm drainage utilities in this
area. Since the 1972 land use survey a most obvious trend has been
the infill of the so-called southeast quadrant of the Township, being
south of I-496 and east of I-96. This growth in the s·outheast quadrant has been based upon favorable location in relation to transportation facilities and anaggressive posture on the part of Township
Officials in providing utilities to and encouraging development of the
area, known as the "Delta Industrial Tract."
Another very evident trend has been the substantial number of large lot
single-family homes built in the non-urbanized portions or Delta
Township. Occuring primarily west of I-96, most of these homes have
been constructed on non-platted parcels of land.
Over one-quarter of the Township's total land area lay vacant as of
1984. The majority of the vacant land within the Township is located
west of I-96. Vacant land appears in a number of forms including floodplains and wetlands, forested areas, large acreage parcels occupied by
a single dwelling, fallow farm land, public lands and areas composed of
poor soils. Vacant land is recognized as an important co1IDDodity since
it represents one of the Township's most valuable natural resources and
presents many opportunities for the future.

•

The existing land use map, Figure GD-III, differentiates between lands
in agricultural production and vacant lands. The amount of land used
for farming activities in the Township has decreased as development of
the Township's industrial tract has intensified, residential subdivisions have been platted and the construction of single family homes on
large parcels has increased. During the period of 1969 to 1978 the
amount of land in agricultural production in Eaton County decreased
by eight percent. (Data source: "Michigan Farm Lands are Increasing
Again", Detroit News, April 12, 1981). During the late 197O's several
hundred acres of farm land in the Township were enrolled in farmland
development rights agreements under the provisions of Act 116 of 1974
being the Farmland and Open Space Preservation Act.
Delta Township has attempted to preserve prime farm lands by a number
of actions including active participation in the aforementioned farmland
preservation program, creation of agricultural zoning districts and
efforts to channel new development to areas already served by public
utilities and services. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes agricultural
activities as a long-term, permanent land use rather than a "holding
area" for future development.

22

�DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure GD-Ill

EXISTING LAND USE

[:]
[]
[]

Single Family Residential

ml

Multi-Family Residential

000
000
000

Single Family Subdivision
Two Family Residential

Office
Commercial Retail
Commercial Service
Warehousing
lndustrial-Manuf acturing
Transportation-Utilities
Public-Semi Public

///
///
///

In
D

Park &amp; Open Space
Agriculture
Vacant &amp; Non-Urban

PRIVATE ROADS NOT SHOWN

REVISED

CITY OF
LAN _SING

NORTH

I

. . ....... .... ..... ·.
- - • -----------

23

I

I

2/84

I

1111111 111111 1

1
1000

1
2000

11 11111 111111 11111111111111111111 11111111

0

4000

�FIGURE P-III

Population Distribution
Five Township Area
1960-1980

!DELTA TWP.
---....,- -MERIDIAN

TWP.

..... EAST LANSING

LANSING/
LANSING
TWP.

-DELHI

TWP.
TWP.
;DELTA

TWP.
TWP.

1960

LANSING/
LANSING TWP.

-EAST LANSING

TWP.
TWP.

1970

EAST
-LANSING

-DELHI TWP.
\DEWITT

TWP.

1980
28

�This page revised Dec. of 198 '
Distribution of Population
in the Five-Township Area
The Five-Township area encompasses a large portion of the Lansing Metropolitan area. Figure P-III portrays changing distribution of population
in the area during the 1960-1980 period. Those portions of the metropolitan area with increasing shares of population are vividly presented.
The Townships of Delhi, DeWitt, Meridian and Delta currently represent
thirty percent of the metropolitan area population as compared to fifteen
percent in 1940. This redistribution of metropolitan area population
appears to be continuing. A possible explanation for this changing
pattern of population distribution is a general tendency for the growth
of a given area to slow after a certain density has been reached.

'~,

During the 1960-1970 period, the population in the suburban townships
surrounding Lansing, being Delhi, DeWitt, Delta and Meridian, increased
by 46 percent while the increase in the 1970-1980 period was 23 percent.
The slow down in the urbanization of the suburbs can be attributed to
many factors including increasing energy costs, a decreasing supply of
land which has the necessary public utilities, and the increasing cost
of development which is characterized by high land costs, high mortgage
rates, and high materials costs.
The Impact of Inmigration on
Delta Township's Population Growth
Inmigration has played a significant role in Delta Township's phenomenal
population growth. Usually, the net migration experienced by an area over
a period of time is determined by finding the difference between the actual
change in population over the same time period. Natural increase or
decrease is determined by the difference between the recorded births and
the recorded deaths attributed to the reg.i on for the time period in
question. Until re·cently, however, birth and death records have not been
kept for areas smaller than a county. During the period of 1960-1970,
sixty-five percent of the population growth in Eaton County was attributed
to the irunigration. Irunigration also had a signif~cant impact in the
1970-1980 period when sixty-four percent of the population growth in Eaton
County resulted from inmigration. Certainly, Delta Township has experienced a large amount of inmigration over the past decade. Due to the
fact that Delta Township's population grew at a greater rate (35%) than
Eaton County's population (25%) during the 1970's, it is likely that
Delta Township experienced a higher inmigration rate than did Eaton County.
Age-Sex Structure of
Delta Township's Population
An analysis of the number of males and females in various age groups

provides useful information for many planning activities. Figure P-IV
provides age-sex pyramids for the Township for the years 1960, 1970 and
1980. Table P-3 illustrates the specific number of persons within various
age groups and what percentage of the Township is within any one age group.
Each of the age groupings in Figure P-IV and Table P-3 are for ten year
periods with the exception of the under 5 years group and the 75 years and
older group.

29

{"""-

�This pare r evised D2 c . of 198 ~

FIGURE P-IV
AGE-SEX PYRAMIDS
DELTA TOWNSHIP

I 980 POPULATION

u• o, .... l--+--+--+--+-----,1---+--+--+--+--+-

7 S Yurt

SENIOR ClTIZEN

PRIME LABOR F'ORCE

STUDENTS
PRE-SCHOOL

U•- SY•Ft malt•

Male.a

I 970 POPULATION
'

75 .,o,
..
,. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ...
•••

SENIOR CITIZEN

. I M E LABOR F'ORCE

STUDENTS
5-14

PRE-SCHOOL

U•O• 5 Yoart

2400

zooo

lt00

,zoo

too

400

0

400

800

Ft111altt

IZ00

1800

zooo

2400

Malta

I 960 POPULATION

,a ., .... i - - - t -•

SENIOR CITIZEN

••• o....

--t--1"-----,1----;---;--+-1"---1----;-._

l---+--+-+-+-----,1---+--+--+--+-----,1---.

PRIME LABOR FORC~

ZS-34

STUDENTS

""PRE-SCHOOL

UUtP 5 Yoart

Z400

zooo

18110

,zoo

0

Fe111altt

800

1200

Malu

30

18 0

zooo

2400

�-

Table P-3
POPULATION AGE GROUPS
DELTA TOWNSHIP
1970

1980

% of population

Male

Female

Total

% of population

Male

Female

Total

Under 5 yrs.

774

789

1563

9%

716

717

1433

6%

5-14

yrs.

2284

2194

4478

26%

2083

1972

4055

17%

15-24

yrs.

1266

1404

2670

15%

2345

2372

4717

20%

25-34

yrs.

1129

1252

2381

14%

2012

2177

4189

18%

35-44

yrs.

1270

1249

2519

15%

1660

1653

3313

14%

45-54

yrs.

992

1002

1994

11%

1366

1367

2733

11%

55-64

yrs.

548

499

1047

6%

970

983

1953

8%

65-74

yrs.

217

236

453

3%

378

511

889

4% ,-,,

75+

yrs.

74

117

191

1%

179

361

540

2%

17., 396
Source:

23,822

U.S. Bureau of Census

30a

�This page revised Dec. of 1984
Figure P-IV and Table P-3 reveal the following facts:
1.

A significant number of the "Baby Boom" generation reside in Delta
Township as evidenced by the 5-14 group in 1970 which became the
15-24 group in 1980. This age group constituted the largest segment
of the population in both 1970 and 1980.

2.

The fact that the majority of the age groups have increased in total
numbers is an indication that migration into the Township took place
between 1970 and 1980.

3.

As might be expected, the number of females in the 75 and older group
is approximately double the number of males.

4.

Indications exist that the Township's population is aging. In 1970
approximately 35% of the population was under age 15 whereas in 1980
the figure had declined to 23%. Conversely, in 1970 approximately
10% of the population was over 55 compared to the 1980 figure for the
same group which was over 14% •

•

30b

�Tiiis page revised Dec. of 198~ ,
Population Per
Household

J
An important social characteristic of population is the continuing decrease

in the population per household in Delta Township. Table P-4 illustrates
past trends in· the population per household in Delta Township over a
twenty year period.
TABLE P-4

POPULATION PER HOUSEHOLD
DELTA TOWNSHIP
1960-1980
Year

Population Per Household

1960

3.74

1970

3.75

1975

3.22

1980

2.83

Source:

U.S. Bureau of Census

The continued decrease in the population per household can be attributed
to many factors including a declining birth rate and corresponding
maturation of the population as a whole. Social factors contributing to
this decline include a greater mobility of the under 24 age group accompanied by higher economic independence, a declining marriage rate, and
a trend toward childless cohabitation.

31

I

�This page revised Dec. of 1984
The U.S. Census -Bureau has reported a 66 percent increase in non-family
households during the 1970's. Nationally, non-family households in 1980
accounted for one-fourth of all units, compared to one-fifth in 1970.
The Census also revealed that almost 90 percent of non-family households
consist of one person.
The 1980 census counts for Delta Township revealed that a significant
difference exists between the population per household figures for
multiple family units and single family detached units. An analysis of
census tracts which consist solely of single-family detached dwellings
revealed that the population per household figure is generally between
3.0 and 3.6 while the population per household figure for census tracts
which were occupied by muliple units ranged from approximately 1.5 to 1.7.
The decline in persons per household while the population increases has
implications as to the demand for and type of dwelling to be provided for
in future years. Based on present trends, it appears that the population
per household figure in Delta Township will continue to decline. This
trend will very likely result in a demand for smaller dwelling units and
a decrease in the school age population.
II

-

Population Projections
Estimates of future population are important in the planning process to
the extent they provide general indications of probable land consumption,
school enrollments, public facility use demand and similar impacts. This
section provides population estimates for the period of 1985 to the year
2000 for Delta Township. The basic methodology which has been used is
a regional cohort-survival model with apportionment among minor civil
divisions to consider the affects of migration. Migration information
has been derived from two data sources: (1) Increases in Delta Township
population in excess of expected cohort-survival totals and (2) Increases
in reported household tax return exemptions on U.S. Census Bureau data.
Table P-5 provides population projections for Delta Township. Eaton County.
the Five-Township Metropolitan Area and the Tri-County Region through the
year 2000.
TABLE P-5
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
TO THE YEAR 2000
1980*

1985

1990

1995

2000

Delta Township

23,822

24,953

28,163

31,361

34,425

Eaton County

88,337

91,235

100,757

110,219

119.262

Five-Township Area

271,661

274,313

283,755

292.186

298,891

Tri-County Region

419,750

425,979

447,181

466,892

483,684

*1980 population figures represent the final 1980 census counts.
Source: Population Projections for the Tri-County Region, 6/1/84, TriCounty Regional Planning Commission, Lansing, Michigan.

32

�This page revised Dec. of 19~
Table P-5 suggests Delta Township, will continue to experience growth
though not nearly as dramatic as occurred in the 1950-1970 period. Based
on the information contained in Table P-5, population increases between
1980 and the year 2000 are projected as follows: Delta Township~ 45%
increase, Eaton County~ 35% increase, Five Township Area~ 10% increase
and the Tri-County Region= 15% increase.
Population projection is not an exact science and is affected by numerous
factors in the local projection area. Increases in employment beyond
that expected, recessionary periods, amenities of a community and other
factors all influence the amount of irunigration. Also, a community's
growth policy may have a significant impact on the population change. If
Delta _Township should institute a growth policy requiring phasing of
development on lands adequately served by utilities, parks, schools, roads
and other services, the estimates of population increase would be different from those being projected. The presentation of estimated population herein has presumed no such growth policy.
The declining household size suggests a leveling off or actual decline of
school-age children during the planning period. This will affect school
facility planning. The trend toward fewer persons per household may be
of importance as to development regulations pertaining to minimum dwelling
unit size.

33

�F!GUU P-V

•

DEI.I'A TOWNS1iil' POPULAI'ION

2,.000

0

Q.

0
0

-...
Q.

0

20.000

0
4

e

z=

~
-

I ,.000

1930

1940

19~0

1960

Year

1970

1990

1980

•
•

JJa

2000

ACTUAL
PROJECTED

�!bis page revised Dec. of 1984
COMMERCIAL BASE ANALYSIS

Commercial facilities in Delta Township are presencly locaced in four
principal areas: The Delta Cencral Business District (CBD), on Saginaw
Highway east of Elmwood Road. on Saginaw Ilighway wast of Mall Drive
West, and at the Waverly Plaza along Waverly Road.

•

•

The Delta Cencral Business District consists of a regional .shopping
cancer, the Lansing Mall, which concains the Kudson's. Penny's and
Montgomery Ward Depart:mant Stores, as well as Maijer Thrifty Acres,
K-Mart and Dornec Village which are located on the south side of Saginaw
Highway across from the Lansing Mall. The scores of the Delta CBD comprise a co'llll'arisou shopping magnec of regional significance. Although
the Lansing Mall - K-i.'!art - Meijer complexes were not planned in a
related fashion and are bisected by the traffic pattern of Saginaw Highway, this grouping of major scores does function as an interrelaced
business district.
The commercial district located on Saginaw Highway ease of Elmwood Road
consists largely of commercial strip developments which were primarily
constructed during the period of 1965 to 1975. There is little or no
functional transition becween the types of commarcial uses in this strip,
and the area is generally congested and unattractive. The area along
Saginaw aighway west of Mall Drive West is evidencing a similar trend
coward total scrip development which will probably be reached unless
alternacive land development policies are iIDl)lemented. With the exception of the Waverly Plaza, the commercial development on the wesc side
of Waverly Road is of a scrip nature. However, existing retail stores
are separated by large distances of non-commercial usage so that a true
strip character has not yet emerged .
!

Characteristics of Existing Commercial Development
Types of
Commercial Enterprises
Retail shopping areas within Delta Township have taken on cwo different
and distinct forms. The first type of commercial development is known
as the shopping center which is defined as "a group of commercial establishments, planned, developed, owned and managed as a unit related in
location, size, and type of shops to the trade area that the unit serves;
it provides on-site parking in definite relationship to the types and
sizes of stores." 1 Prior to the evolution of the shopping center.
retail scores were usually developed as a llliscellaneous collection of
individual buildings each on a separate parcel of street frontage. The
second cype of commercial development is generally referTed co as scrip
development. This r:ype of develop1118nt usually fronts on both sides of
an arterial roadway and extends inward for half a block . Strip development is often characterized by an assortment of office and commercial
uses requiring relatively small parcels of land.

1

Toe Community Builders Handbook, Urban Land Institute, Wash.ingtan D.C.
1968, pg. 264.
34

�This page revised Dec. of
Shot:it:Jing centers are generally classified as one of four types; t:he neighborhood, the community, the regional, and the super regional. The shopping center's type is determined by its 1D&amp;jor tenant or tenants rather
,-,
than site area or square feet of structures. The Urban I.and Institute
defines the various t71'es of shopping centers as follows: 2

a neighborhood center provides for the sale of convenience goods
(foods, drugs, and sundries) and personal services (laundry and
dry cleaning, barbering, shoe repairing, etc.) for the day to
day living needs of the immediate neighborhood. re is built
around a super-market as the principal tenant. rn theory, the
neighborhood center has a t71'ical gross leasable area of 50,000
square feet. rn practice, it may range in size from 30,000 to
100,000 square feet. The neighborhood center is the smallest
type of shopping center.
In addition to the convenience goods and personal services of
the neighborhood center, a community center provides a wider
range of facilities for the sale of soft lines (wearing apparel
for men, women, and children) and hard lines (hardware and
appliances). The community center makes a greater variety of
merchandise available in sizes, styles, colors, and prices. It
is built around a junior deparaienc store, variety store, or
discount depart:mant store as the major tenant, in addition to a
supermarket. It does not have a full-line depart:mant store,
though it may have a strong specialty store. rn theory, the
t71&gt;ical size is 150,000 square feet of gross leasable area, but
in practice it may range in size from 100,000 to 300,000 square
feet. The community center is the intermediate type of center,
most difficult to eseimate for size and pulling power.
The regional center provides fo.r general merchandise, apparel,
furniture, and home furnishings. in depth and variety, as well
as a range of services and recreational facilities. It is
built around one or c-wo full-line deparaient stores of generally not less than 100,000 square feet. ,rn theory, a
typical size for definitive purposes is 400,000 square feet of
gross leasable area. The regional center is che second largest
cype of shopping center. As such, the regional center provides
services cypical of a business district yet nae as extensive as
those of che super regional center.
A super regional center provides for extensive variety in
general merchandise, apparel, furnicure, and home furnishings,
as well as a variety of services and recreational facilities.
It is built around at least three major department stores of
generally not less than 100,000 square feet each. !n theory,
che typical size of a super regional center is about 750,000
square feet of gross leasable area. rn practice, the size
ranges to more than 1,000,000 square feet.
There are examples of chree cypes of the above described shopping centers
within Delea Township: Neighborhood Center - the West Saginaw Plaza,
located northwest of che interseccion of Saginaw liighway and Waverly
r-,.,
Zoollars and Cants of Shoooing Centers:
Institute, pg. 4.
35

1984, The Urban Land

�'this page revised on Dec. of 1984
Road, which consists of approximately 55,000 square feet. Community
Center - che Waverly Plaza, located southwest of the intersection of St.
Joe Ilighway and Waverly Road, which consists of approximately 180,000
square feet. Super Regional Canter - che Lansing Mall, located aortilwest of Che intersection of Saginaw f!ighway and Elmwood Road, which consists of approximately l,000,000 square feet.
Location of Types of
Commarcial Enterprises
The majority of the Township's comparison retail stores are located in
th~ Delta Central Business District. Department and apparel stores are
more likely co be located in Che Delta Central Business District chan any
other commercial area wichin the Township. The majority of the Township's retail convenience stores are located on Saginaw Ilighway east of
Elmwood Road. Toe fact that convenience stores have yot co decentralize
on a neighborhood level throughout the Township could be attributed co
two factors: l) Delta Township households are very auto-oriented, cherafore, it is not an inconvenience for the majority of residents to drive
several m:i.les to purchase day-co-day necessities, 2) many residents
oppose the establishment of any cype of co1111Nrcial developmant in their
residential neighborhoods due to the fear that the commercial development
I1ould change the residential character.
Fast-food restaurants are presently concentrated on Saginaw aighway ease
of Elmwood Road due to the high visibility and traffic exposure offered
by this area. Quality sit-down restaurants are much mere dispersed
throughout the Township than the fast-food outlets. Toe majority of
the Township's hotel facilities are located in close proximity to the
Canal/Yest Saginaw intersection •

•

Reasons for
Locating Commercial Uses
Delta Township has experienced steady growth in commercial develop111ent
over the past decade. There are several reasons which account for retail
merchants desiring to locate in Delta Township: Toe Township's arterial
street pattern affords good traffic access while providing excellent
exposure to retail firms; the availability of land within the Township.
when compared to 1110re urbanized and centralized locations in the Lansing
Metropolitan Area, is a primary locational factor; and the existence of
adequate public services makes the area attractive for commercial
development. Toe steady increases in the Township's population over past
decades, as well as the area's growth potential. is another inducement to
retail firms. Toe existence of a regional shopping center such as the
Lansing Mall also serves as an inducement for commercial development to
locate in the area. Finally, Delta Township constitutes a separate
market place within the Lansing Metropolitan Area.
II

Projection of Future Commercial Development

In analyzing and projecting Delta Township's commercial facilities requirements. it is necessary to distinguish between two basic kinds of
shopping needs. First, . comparison facilities must be provided co serve
the needs for clothing, furniture. household appliances, and other major
items. Secondly, convenience facilities such as groceries, drug stores.
and barber shops will be required to serve daily shopping needs. This
section will analyze Delta Townships comparision shopping needs as well
36
-

-

--

- -- -~ -

-

-

�lb.is paga revised Dec. 0£ 1984
as several of the more significant convenience shopping needs such aa
food stores, drug stores, hardware scores and restaurants. There are
five basic seeps required to project che facilities needed co serve
comparison and basic convenience shopping needs.

~,~

1

First, the primary trade areas to be served by comparison and convenience
shopping facilities must be determined. Generally, the trade area of
convenience facilities is limted co surrounding residential neighborhoods,
while the trade area for a regional comparison shopping center includes
a large pori:ion of the Lansing Metropolitan Area.
The second step required to project che need for comparison and convenience shopping facilities is to determine future total sales in various
retail categories wichin the trade a~ea. Determination of trade area
future total retail sales is dependent upon changes in population, purchasing power and eXl'enditure patterns within the trade area.
The third seep is to determine the proportion of total trade area retail
sales that will acrue co the projected facilities. Convenience facilities are considered to draw business throughout their trade area. The
proportion of total trade area retail sales that comparision facilities
will draw is dependent upon a number of factors, most imtJortant of which
is the relative quality and location of competitive facilities.
The fourth seep is to determine the amount of square footage required to
sustain the proportion of total trade area retail sales that the facilities will generate. This determination can be based on current projected
marketing standards.
The final seep is to compare the projected future requirements with
,--...~
existing facilities. This comparision will indicate the extent to which
new facilities will be required.

,

In determining future comparison shopping facilities needs, atten~ion
will be focused on the concentration of comparision facilities centered
in the Delta Central Business District. These facilities include the
Lansing Mall Stores, Meijer Thrifty Acres, K-Mart, and Cornet Village.
rur~her, the scores of the Delta Central Business District can be meaningfully compared with other major shopping areas in and near the trade
area. This comparison will be the basis for assessing the i.l!q&gt;act of these
stores on the trade area.
Determination of Comparision
Shopping Trade Area
!he first step required to analyze the major comparison facilities in and
near the Lansing Mall is to determine the trade area served by these
facilities. · The eXl'erience of regional shopping centers in other metroplitan areas indicates that such centers draw a major portion of their
customers fro~ within a three to five mile radius . For the pur,,ose of
this s~udy, it has been assumed that the Delta Central Business District
has a trade area approximated by a five mile radius. This trade area is
illustrated in Figure C-l. It encompasses virtually all of Delta
Township, most of the western half of the City of Lansing-Lansing
Township area, as well as significant portions of Watertown and DeWitt
,,---..
Townships.

37

�!h.is page revised Dec. of 1984

•

While it is assumed that 50 percent of the Dalta. CBD customers live
beyond c:he five mile trade area, it is probable that in the future this
percentage will decrease. As Delta Township becomes t110re densely populated, it will contribute mere and t110re patrons to the scores of the
Delta CBD. As some areas near Delta Township becoua mere highly
urbanized, they can be exl)ected to develop their own comparison shopping facilities. !his will reduce the demand that would otherwise be
placed on Delta Township's facilities. Conversely, because of th• TriCounty Region's excellent highway system and the expected future pattern
of population grow,:h, it is likely that the scores of the De.lea CBD will
continue to play a large role in fulfilling the comparison shoppin.g
needs of people living in c:he outlying portions of the Tri-County Region.
Based on the foregoing considerations, it is assumed that by the year
2000 approximately 60 percent of the patrons of the Delta CBD scores
will live wic:hin the five mile trade area. While chis judgement should
not be interpreted as a firm prediction, it will be useful as a basis
for further analysis.
Determination of Convenience
Shopping Trade Area
Having determined the trade area of Delta Township's comparison shopping
facilities, attention is now directed to consideration of the trade area
of Delta Township's convenience shopping facilities. As previously
noted, convenience shopping facilities generally have a lim:ited trade
area. !his is understandable because of the frequency with which they
are patronized by individual customers. Because people are reluctant
to travel far to satisfy daily shopping needs and because of the amount
of traffic generated by convenience shopping trips, convenience scores
ideally should have a trade area no larger c:han a grouping of neighborhoods. 'therefore, the exact distribution of c:rade area delineations for
convenience shopping facilities in Delta Township will depend upon the
neighborhood unit plan. !he present analysis will nstrict itself to
specifying the total amount of convenience shopping facilities which
will be required to serve Delta Township's projected year 2000 population.

Projection of
Future Retail Sales
!he second major step required c:o analyze and project the need for cOlllparision and convenience shopping facilities within Delea Township is c:o
determine trade area future total sales in various retail categories.
Determination of trade area fucure total retail sales is dependent upon
c:hree factors: 1) population growth within c:he trade area, 2) growth in
per capita retail expenditures within c:he c:rade area, and 3) c:rade area
changes in retail expenditure patterns .

Current and projected populations for the trade area are presented in
Table C-1. !his table divides the trade area into the following unic:s:
Delta Township, the Lansing-Lansing Township area, Watertown and DeWitt
Townships. Population increases in the Lansing and Lansing Township portions of c:he c:rade area were determined from projections of the total
population of Lansing and Lansing Township by using a c:wo-scep procedure.
First, c:he Lansing-Lansing Township area was surveyed to determine the
distribution of vacant residential land which might acco111Dl0date increases
in population. Second, future land development c:rends for the LansingLansing Township area were evaluated for their probable impact on the
38

�-I

'lbis page revised Dec. 0£~3!!
development of vacant residential land. Consideration was given to the
projected distribution and extent of various densities of development.
~~
Based on the distribution of vacant residential land and expected
'~
development trends. one-half of the projected population increase for the
Lansing-Lansing Township area was allocated to the portions of Lansing
and Lansing Township lying within the . five mile trade area.

39

--

�111is page revised Dec. of 1984

TABLE C-l
TRADE AREA
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
F'IVE MILE

1980*

1990**

2000..,.

Delta Township

23,822

28,163

34 , 425

Lansing-Lansing Twp. Area***

68,100

7l, 739

73,720

DeWitt Township*,...*

l,900

2 , 066

2, 103

Watertown Township*****

1,200

1 . 320

1,530

Political Subdivision of the Trade Area

*U . S. Census Bureau figure.
**PTojection provided by the Tri-County Regional Planning
Commission, July l, 1984.
***Lansing-Lansing Township area figure represents 50% of the
projected population figure.

****DeWitt Township figure represents 20% of the projected
population figure.

•

*****Watertown Township figure represents 33% of the projected
population figure .
The portions of DeWitt and Watertown Township's populations living within the
five-mile trade area were determined by the same methodology as was applied to
the Lansing-Lansing Township portion of the trade area. The portion of the
r:wo township's 1980 population living within the trade area was estimated on
the basis of the existing pattern of residential developaent. The portion of
the two township's 1980 through year 2000 populations living within the trade
area was determined fro• Tri-County Regional Planning Commission population
p~ojections . Population increases were allocated to the five-mile trade area
on the basis of the availability of residential land and expected developaent
trends. !twas determined that approximately one-fifth of DeWitt Township's
1980 through the year 2000 population will be living within the five mile
trade area. !twas also determined that approximately one-third of Watertown
Township ' s 1980 through the year 2000 populati ons will be l i ving wi t hin the
t:rade area.
The second factor bearing on future trade area retail sales is future per
capita retail expenditures. Future per capita retail expenditures can be
determined by estimating projected increases in real per capita purchasing
power and applying such a projection co an estimate of curTent per capita
retail expenditures.

40

�!his page revised Dec. 00984
During the period of 1970 to 1980 per capita incomes for the five mile trade
area increased by 122% resulting in an annual increase for the period of 12%. 1
The inflation rate has fluctuated widely in the past decade varying from a
~
high of 13% in 1979 to a low of less than 3% in 1983.2 Predicting the amount
of inflation which will take place in the future is difficult since the rate
is dependent on a number of factors including the Federal Reserve Board's
1I1Cney supply policies, the strength of the dollar, prices for essential raw
materials such as oil, food and other commcdities, productivity and wage
rates and deregulation of certain industries. For the purpose of this study
a 5% annual inflation rate has been utilized. When the inflation rate is
applied to the annual per capita income increase a 7% annual increase in per
capita incomes results which was multiplied times the 18 year forecasting
period (1982-2000) resulting in a year 2000 estimated per capita income of
$20,446 which represents a 126% increase for the period.
In 1982 approximately 49% of estimated personal incomes for the Tri-County
Region were spent on retail sales.3 For che purposes of chis study, it is
assumed chat che 1982 percentage of personal income devoted to retail expenditures will remain constant through the year 2000. Applying che aforementioned
percentage to the year 2000 projected Tri-County inflation adjusted per capita
income of $20,446 results in an inflation adjusted per capita income retail
expenditure for the year 2000 of $10,018. Table C-2 illustrates a year 2000
estimate of per capita retail expenditures along with projections as to how
retail sales ~ill be divided among various categories. The estimates as to
how retail sales will be allocated is based on 1982 retail sales information
for the Tri-County Region provided by the Lansing Regional Chamber of
Commerce. 4

1Data Source:

Urban Decision Systems, Los Angeles, California, October 13,
1983. 1970 per capita income :a $3,480, 1980 pe:i; capita
income :a $7,745.

2oata Source:

Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor
July, 1984.

3oata Source:

Sales and Marketing Management Magazine, 1983 Survey of
Buying Power, U. S. Metropolitan Market Projections for
Retail Sales, October 1983.

41

�'lbis page revised Dae. of l984

,

,/

•
TABLE C-2
n:AR 2000 TRI-COUNTY PROJECTED

PER CAPITA RETAIL EXPENDITURE PATTERNS*
Total Retail Spending

$l0,0l8

Comparison Stores
General Merchandise Stores
Clothing and Accessories Stores
Furniture and Homa Furnishings
Other Comparison Stores

•
'

2,104
501
401
801

Convenience Stores
Food Stores**
Hardware and Building Materials
Drug Stores and Pharmacies

1,603
300
200

Eating and Drinking Places**

1,403

Other Retail Expenditures

2,705

*Based on 1982 dollars.
**In 1982 19% of retail eJqlenditures were devoted to food stores. This
number has been reduced to 16% for the year 2000 projection and a corresponding increase of 3% has been made in che eating and drinking category in
order co reflect projected crends.
Data Source:

Sales and Marketing Management Magazine, 1983 Survey of Buying
Power, U.S. Metropolitan Market Projections for Retail Sales,
October, 1983.

42

. I

�!his page rev-isad Dec. ofrs.84
~

Trends in Retail Expenditures
The third factor bearing on future trade area retail sales is cunent and
eJCllected changes in retail expenditure patterns. The following list contains
expected trends in retail expenditures which could effect businesses within
Delta Township:
l.

Eating and drinking establishments will experience an increase in business
as 1110re working couples consuma a larger percentage of their maals outside
of the home resulting in a possible decline in grocery store sales.

Z.

New tTIJes of retailing will be eseablished in the local market including
factory outlets, off-price discount stores and greater use of drive-thru
facilities.

3.

!tis questionable whether additional super regional shopping malls will be
constructed in the metropolitan area due to market saturation and the costs
of raw land and construction.

4.

Greater emphases will be placed on service-tTIJe businesses because of an
increase in the number of two income and one person households.

5.

The popularity of "one-stop" general merchandising stores offering a wide
variety of goods including grocery, hardware, apparel, houseware and
appliance items in a single store will continue.

6.

A resurgence in small speciality stores offering a limited line of high
quality merchandise with personalized service is expected in the nexe
decade.

7.

The continued "aging" of the population will be reflected in increased
expenditures for health services, drug and pharmaceutical items, travel,
etc.

8.

Retailars will renovate existing stores in an effort to obtain greater
sales from "old" facilities.

9.

Competition for retail sales in the Lansing area will intensify due to
the opening of a tieijers Store on Lake Lansing Road, planned expansions
at the Frandor Plus Center on Michigan Avenue, renovations to the Logan
Center and the redevelopment of downtown Lansing.

~~

Having arrived at a projection of tha year 2000 per capita expenditures in
various retail categories and having also determined the population of the
various zones of the trade area of Delta Township's major comparison shopping
facilities, it is now possible to det•rmine the total future retail expenditures that will be generated within the various zones of the trade area.
This determination is based upon population multiplied by per capita expenditures. !he results of this multiplication are presented in Table C-3. Comparision expenditures are presented for all zones of the trade area because
all zones will con~ribute business to the comparison shopping facilities of
Delta Township. Convenience expenditures are presented only for Delta Township because Delta Township's convenience facilities will be supp.o rted primarily by local residents.
,,,-,.,

43

�!his page revised Dec. of 1984

•

Another factor determining the impact of loss on the various zones of the
trade area is the distance of the Delta CBD and the distance of competing
facilities from the various zones of the trade area. The fun:her away the
Delta CBD is fr011l the center of population of a trade area zone, the smaJ.ler
the proportion of total retail sales generated within the trade area zone
that will accrue to the Delta CBD will be. Conversely, the farther away
c0111peting facilities are from the cancer of population of a trade area zone,
the larger will be Delta Central Business District's proportion of the trade
area zone's retail sales.
Having determined the future retail ex;ienditure pattern for the C011ll)arision
and convenience trade area of Delta Township, attention will now be directed
to determining t:he proportion of future co11ll)arison and conve,n ience sal.es
generated wit:hin the trade area t:hat will be spent in Delt:a Township's retail facilities. This determination is quite simple with respect to convenience type retail sales. As noted earlier, convenience stores do business
within their relatively limited trade areas. Therefore, it will be assumed
that all convenience sal.es potential. generated wit:hin Delta Township will be
spent in Delta Township. This asswirption is dependent upon the provision of
sufficient, properly located conven.i.ence merchandise outlets to allow full
realization of their potential.
Table C-3

,.

YEAR 2000 PROJ'ECTEO TRADE AREA

RETAIL EXPENDITURES*
Delta
Township

City of Lansing
Lansing Township

Township

$72,430,000
17,247,000
13,804,000
27,574,000

$155 , 107,000
36,934,000
13,804,000
59,050,000

$4,425,000
l ,054 ,000
843,000
1,685,000

DeWitt

Waten:ovu

Township

Comparison Stores
General Merchandise
Clothing and Accessories
Furniture and Rome Furnishings
Other Co11ll)arison Stores
Convenience Stores
Food Stores
Hardware and Building Materials
Drug St:ores and Pharmacies

55,183,000
10,328,000
6,885,000

Eating and Drinking Places

48,298,000

Other Retail E.xi)enditures

93,120,000

*Based on 1982 dollars .
Source:

!able prepared by Delta Township Planning Department
based on data presented in !able C-2.

44

$3 ,219.,000
767,000
614,000
l,204,000

�This page revised Dec; of9t9S4
Determination of Accrual
of Future Trade Area Sales
to Delta Township
Determination of the proportion of future trade area comparison reta;il sales
that will accrue to Delta Township's major comparison facilities is a complicated task involving three considerations. These three considerations are
(1) the existence of competitive facilities, (Z) the relative attractiveness
of competitive facilities, and (3) th• distance of Delta Township's comparison facilities and their competitors from th• various zones of the trade area.
The first consideration in determining the proportion of total trade area comparison sales accruing to Delta Township's comparison facilities is the existence of competitive facilities. An investigation of reta:il sales outlets
within the Tri-County Region led to the conclusion that there are two regional
shopping centers and three co'lllllWllty shopping centers in direct competition
for the retail sales that will be generated within the trade area of the Delta
Central Business District. The two regional shopping centers in competition
with the Delta Central Business District are the Frandor Shopping Cancer and
Meridian Mall. Th• three community shopping centers in competition with th•
Delta Central Business District are the Waverly Plaza, Logan Square, and
Edgemont Canter. The City of Lansing's Central Business District is also
located within the delineated trade area and competes with the stores of the
Delta Central Business District. Although the City of Grand Ledge shopping
area is not located within the five au.le trade area, it does have an impact
on the Delta CBD.
Table C-4 provides a listing of neighborhood and regional shopping centers
within the Tri-County area. Although this list is not all inc.l.usive, it
does include those shopping centers which have the most impact on the Delta
CBD's five ad.le trade area.

~~

The second primary consideration which :impacts the Delta Central Business
District is the relative attractiveness of the enumerated competitive facilities. Six factors must be weighed in evaluating the relative attractiveness
of the competitive comparison facilities. Three of . these factors are related
to accessibility and circulation: 1) the ease of accessibility to the various
competitive facilities as determined by surrounding street patterns; 2) the
availability of convenient parking spaces; and 3) the features of internal
vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns which facilitate or hinder
customer use. A fourth important consideration influencing the relative
attractiveness of competitive shopping facilities will be the existence or
absence of climate control advantages common in modern shopping malls. The
fifth factor pertaining co the relative attractivenss of competitive shopping
facilities will be the drawing power of major department stores associated
with those facilities. The sixth and most basic consideration pertaining to
the relative attractiveness of competitive facilities will be their total
size.
The Delta Central Business District and the competing comparison shopping
facilities were evaluated in terins of the six criteria of attractiveness. !t
was detel-mined ~hat the three regional shopping centers were of approximately
equal attractivness when judged on the basis of all six criteria. Of course,
all of the main shopping areas have distinctive features by which they are
1::::=:::,
f
'
uniquely characterized. However, negative features in each shopping area
tended to be balanced by equally positive features in the same area.

45

�./

•

'l'his page revised Dec. of 1984
Based on the number of shopping facilities in competition with the Delea
Cancral Business District and on the relative attractiveness of those facilities and the distance of the Delta Central Business District and competing
shopping facilities from the center of population of the various Lansing
Mall trade area zones, a determination was made as to the proportion of total
area retail sales which would accrue to the Delta Central Business District.
!twas determined that the Delta Central Business District would receive
approximately 85 percent of the total retail sales generated within the Delta
Township portion of its trade area, l5 percent of the retail sales generated
within the Lansing-Lansing Township area, 15 percent of the retail sales
generated within DeWitt Township and 30 percent of the rer,ail sales generaced
within Watertown Township.
TABLE C-4

N'EIGHBORHOOO AND REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITHIN THE TRI-COUNTY AREA
Gross Leasable
noor Area (sq. ft.)*

~

Lansing Mall

•

•

Number of
Scores*

1,000,000

105

Frandor

600,000

100

Meridian Mall

640,000

116

West Saginaw Hwy. Meijer, K-Mart, Cornet Village

284,000

18

Logan Square

226,000,

27

Meridian Township Meijer

220,000

l

Waverly Plaza

182,000

15

South Lansing Meijer

175,000

l

East Lansing Meijer

165 .ooo

l

Cedar Park Center

112,000

25

Edgemont Shopping Center

110,000

12

Frandor Plus

64,000

3

Haslett Village Square

80,000

20

West Saginaw Plaza

58,000

7

Country Meadows Village Center

55,000

14

Bath Corners Shopping Center

37,000

8

Granger Mall

30,000

9

Willow Plaza

25,000

6

"'The square footage of the various retail facilities and the number of
stores within them are subject to constant change. The square footage
figures and retail score figures include vacant units.
46

�,

-

!his page revised Dec. o~84
Based on the foregoing determination of the proportion of total retail sales
generated within the different zones of the trade area which are attributable
to the Delta Central Business District, and upon data presented in Table C-3 a ;=-._
determination was made of future total c:rade area retail expenditures accruing
to c:he Delta Central Business District. The proportion of c:ocal rade area
retail expenditures accruing to the Delta Central Business District is presented in Table C-5.
TABLE

c-s

PROPORTION OF TOTAL TRADE AREA RETAIL EXPENDITURES
ACClUimG TO THE DELIA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IN THE YEAR 2000*
Delta
Township

City of Lansing
Lansing Township

DeWitt
Township

Watertown
Township

$61,566,000
14,660,000
11,733,000
23,438,000

$23,266,000
5,540,000
2,071,000
8,858,000

$664,000
158,000
126,000
253,000

$966,000
2.:30,000
184,000
351,000

Couq,arison Stores
General Merchandise
Clothing and Accessories
Furniture and Hotna Furnishings
Other Comparison Stores

Convenience Stores
Food Stores
Hardware and Building Materials
Drug Stores and Pharmacies

55,183,000
10,328,000
6,885,000

Eating and ~rinking

48,298,000

Other Retail Expenditures

93,120,000

*Based on 1982 dollars.
Source: Table prepared by Delta Township Planning Deparaient
based on data presented in Table C-3.

47

�·~-:, •t'l•l a, puuw11111d n•p uo puwq 1u.. uwd110 lttfUHfd dy11911r101 •11110 Aq "1'1•1

iJUi:, p\ii iJiifoii •011

"""'1"1'

:11nnos

'IIJflHHUf p1111n llt!&lt;IJn ''196Q :i,J;oJU3:)~"'IS 1"
11u1uu lu1ddo11" 1wuo9l;o1 · s·n 101 11011e•10JUI 1001
nd nt•sz

•u•"""

· •1•11or l861 "" """"'•
000''11l

Oll

OOO'Olf '{6

9;oJfllfrt111d~J lfl!l"1' U'fJO

000''16{

lll

000'96l'9'T

11unupq '"'" lhtfll!J

ooo•.,.,
ooo·u,
000'60l

"~'

000•~99•9

8l
~9l

OOO'tlll ' 01
0OO'Ul'H

""' :Jl!WJWlfd "''" !l;oJnJs ""'"
"'"'1111"" '"'"''"' ruw "1"r1r1•n
11;o1n1s """.f
!l".IOIS ""U"f"'""'":I

(llffl 909

OOO't'll

OIJ0'~'1C

ooo· ~o,

OOO'tll
000'11{
000'009' I

ooo·n,

ooo·u

ooo' It,
OOO'ltl
000°1'16

0

000°6(9

06

ooo'lH'6

ooo'on

06

000'8{'1'(l

OOO'll

IOI

000' IIC 'l
OOO'll6'~
000'969''1lt

000'601
ooo·u,

OOO'llt

OIi
06 t

901
OIi
06 t

OOO'lll'II
000'099''11
000'99~•,.,,

ooo·,s

ooo' ""'

IJIIJnlS Un!lfJl!dMo:, J;o'fJO
!llfllflf!lfll.lflJ -ow ruw lUfllfU.lflJ
""f.10111111:,:,y ruw lu1q1n1:,
""fl'U""".l"M 111.1;,u;,:1
11;un1s ttn11f 111d•n:J

' '·" • t;s

Ui

11w1y

""J'""""
""'If.I!

.1nnu
w:,.1y
-IIOfl pnw w:uy
""" J.f. I wJn.t

t"•J 11nnGs
Uf WWJY JOOl.f
r•uynl,w9 l!1tJy
1tf11!Jl-Unfl

'""J wumfis
llf l!UY JOOIJ
PWJfnl,:,9 W3J'f

• l.t ·tis u1
wuy

JOOIJ

· ,_. ·tis
Jlld llllfl!S

1

i,unftfiu11b3

· i.t · Gs u,
WWJy

JOOIJ

~rs
Hd llllll!S

1

s;,Jn1y puwib3

r• 1 tnb;o9

flUfnl,119

1tru.t I" '"·'·
l!IIJV lll'l!Jl
"'" JO ""' UOd !ldf'f!111'101
IUJIIUl!l pu11 UrlOJJIIJl!H
'J1fHIIO 'IUfllUl!l JO Alf:,

l!PJ'f
uo, un,1

3111!11 llqJ

JO

"'''""""l • ,,,.n

SNWJ.UYd 311RllONJdllJ ll'f!JII flOOl JIIUS 01 ffJlllOOJII :J:,YdS 11001.4 'llVUII

9-:&gt; J1WY1

•.,- ·

.

"'1

�This page revised Dec. of~84
Projected Retail noor
Space Requirements
!able C-6 indicates retail floor space required co serve future trade area
r-.,
retail expenditure patterns. This table projects required space for comi,arison,
convenience and eating and drinld.'ng facilities in the year 2000. The projections of future required floor area for each category of comaarcial activity.
were developed by dividing projected expenditure levels by established expeuciicure rates per square foot of com:marcial space.
!able C-6 also ponrays the required floor area of various comparison and convenience retail facilities for the year 2000. The seventh column of Table C-6
entitled "Total Trade Area" represents the sum of the required comi,arision
floor area for the Delta Township poniou of the trade a~ea as well as for the
portion of the trade area outside Delta Township. The total commarcial floor
space area requirement projected in this column does not reflect the total
amount of commercial facilities which could be sustained within the Delta
Central Business District in the year 2000 because, as previously explained,
only 60 percent of the cust01118rs rlll originate fr01ll within the primary trade
area. The eighth column in this table, entitled "Non-Trade Area," indicates
the floor area required to serve cust01118rs originating fr01ll beyond the trade
area. The final column in Table C-6 indicates the floor area which can be
sustained by both the Central Business District trade area and non-trade area
customers. The year 2000 convenience shopping space requirements are shown in
the third column of Table C-6.

TABLE C-7
COMPARISON OF 1984 AND YEAR 2000
REQUIRED SHOPPING FACILITIES
Floor Area of
Existing Facilities in sq. ft.
(1984)

Projected Requiremanes in sq. ft.
(2000)

Additional·
Floor Area
Required

Comparison Stores
535,000
143,000
24,000

1,600,000
311,000
218,000

1,065,000
168,000
194,000

120,000
3,000
12,000

209,000
132,000
44,000

89,000
129,000
32,000

Eating and Drinking

158,000

396,000

238,000

Other Retail Expenditures

250,000*

716,000

466,000

General Merchandise
Clothing and Accessories
Furniture and Home Furnishings
Convenience Stores
Food Stores
Hardware and Building 11.aterials
Drug Stores and Pharmacies

*Estimate
Source: Table prepared by Delta Township Planning Department
based on data presented in Table C-6.
Table C-7 compares exis~ing commercial space in Delta rovnship
with projected commercial space requirements for the year 2000.

49

�!bis page revised Dec. of 1984
!II

•

•

Major Findings of che Commercial Base Analysis
!n view of che foregoing analyses of exiscing and projecced character-

istics of Delea Township's commercial base, che following conclusions
are significant in the develop1!18nt of che Township's Conqn.·ehensive Plan:
l.

!be commercial base analysis revealed that the trade area could
absorb additional reta:f.l floor space in all of the categories
analyzed. Of course the figures provided represent projections
based on ava:f.lable econo'lll:i.c daca and current assumptions which could
fluctuate widely in the future.

2.

The Township is presencly serving as che retail center for the
western portion of cha Lansing Metropolitan Area, particularly
regarding hotel accommodations, restaurants and major dapar'ODllnt
stores. !be Township's close proxi'lll:i.ty co the ait"t&gt;orc, advantageous
location to che interscace system and growing presence as an
identifiable market contribute co che concentration of certain commarcial uses in the area.

3.

!n order co insure the continued viability of the central business
district, efforts should be made to solve local traffic ingress and
egress problems, reduce the excessive number of driveways penetrating
Saginaw Righway, promote the concept of a service drive paralleling
the arterial roadway. regulate cha proliferation of signs and provide for landscaping provisions within co111111ercial areas.

4.

!tis recommended that commercial development be encouraged co infill
existing commercially zoned vacant areas and cluster when possible in
order co avoid intrusions into residential areas. utilize existing
uitlicy services and provide comparison shopping opportunities.

S.

!c should be noted chac Delea Township is particularly well suited
for the establishment of a exhibicion hall/convention center due to
favorable access provided by interstate freeways, che availability of
a significant number of hotel/mocel rooms and che existence of
support facilicies such as restaurants and a regional shopping mall.

6.

!£ the supply of vacant co1111m1rcially zoned land in the Township
becomes limited the following trends are anticipated:
a.

Rezoning requests to accommodate commercial land uses will
increase.

b.

Proposals will be filed for commercial developments ac outlying
loc,ations which often "leapfrog" ahead of available utility
services.

c.

Real estate interests will attempt to develop interior parcels
located behind commercial properties on West Saginaw Highway .

•
so

�..

~

c.

Real eseace incereses will aeceJlll)e co develop incerior parcels
locaced behind commercial propar~ies on Wese Saginaw Highway.

51

�Tois p&amp;ge revised Dec. of 1984
INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS

The largest single tract of industrially zoned land in the Lansing Metropolitan Area lies within Delta Township. Located in the southeast quadrant of the Township, the industrial tract eXl)erienced a significant
amount of develop1D8nt during the l970's. This section b&amp;gins with a
discussion of the Township's ex:i.sting industrial. development which includes a listing of major industrial. firms within the Township. The
second por~ion of this section provides projections for future industrial
development in the Township and also notes recent trends in industrial
employment.

r

Analysis of Delta Townshiu's Existing Industrial Base
The principal industrial, wholesaling and distribution activities in
the Township are concentrated within the Delta Township Industrial
Tract. This 2100-acre area of land is generally bounded by Mc. Hope
Righway on the nor~h, US-27/Temporary I-69 on the east and southeast,
and I-96 on the west and southwest. Three major facilities are situ.atad
in this tract including the Oldsmobile Diesel Engine ?lane, Meijer Distribution Center and the Erickson Electric Generating Station owned by
t:he Lansing Board of Water and Light. The industrial tract also includes the area bounded by I-496 to t:he north, Mt. Hope Highway to the
south, Waverly Road to the east and Homeland Subdivision to the wast.
This area includes three major industrial facilities being the General
Motors ?art Warehouse, Jacklin Steel and Douglas Steel. Figure I-I
illustrates the location of the Delt:a Township Industrial Tract.
The proximity of Delta Township's industrial tTact to major interstate
highway connections is a local manifestation of the Lansing Metropolitan
Area's position as t:he economic hub of central Michigan. The Grand
Trunk Western Railroad also plays an important role in the activities of
Delta Township's industrial, warehousing and distribution operations.
The General Motors ?arts Warehouse and Oldsmobile Diesel Engine ?lane
extensively utilize t:he railroad for incoming and outgoing shipments.
The Maijer Distribution Center receives most food goods by rail and
thereafter, the bulk of goods is trucked to Meijer retail stores throughout: Michigan.
The Grand Trunk Railroad line has evidenced its intention to expand
services to the industrial tract by construction of new marshalling yards
(1971), an auto port (1975-76), new spur tracks to the Meijer Distribution Center (1975) and new spur tracks to the Oldsmobile Diesel Engine
Plant (1980).
The proposed construction of !-69 from Charlotte to Lansing in Eaton
County will traverse Section 33 within the industrial tract. At this
time the Michigan Department of Transportation intends to locate a portion of the roadway east of the existing I-96 and south of Millett
Highway. It is estimated that approximately SO acres of industrially
zoned land will be acquired for I-69 right of way. The proposed !-69
project will not include additional access points to the industTial
cract.

52

�FIGURE

r-r

DEI..TA TOWSRIP

INDUSTRIAL TRACT

Lnduscrial Tract Locacion
wichin Delea Township

AVI

!lluscracion of Delea Township lndusctial Trace
53

�/

This page was revised A,ril of 1983
Dec. of 1984
COlJll)OSition of
Existing Industry
Delta Township ' s full range of industrial, warehousing and distribution .
activities is shown in Table I-1. This t:able illustrates t:he a.umber of
Delta Township firms engaged in various industrial, warehousing and dist:ribucion activities. Table I-1 indicates that a major portion of Delta
Township's industrial firms are engaged in s0111a form of distribution.
Included in the distribution group is t:he General Motors Parts Distribut:ion Center discussed earlier along with t:he Meijer and Coca-Cola Distribution Cancers. The ocher firms represented in t:he ~istribution group
are colJll)aratively small t:ransfer and t:rucking OlJerations. Most of t:he
establishments engaged in distribution activities are affiliated with
firms car1:7ing on Ol)erations outside the Lansing Metrol)olitan Area. ~1th
t:he excel)tion of the General Motors Pares Distribution Center and Meijer
Distribution Center, firms engaging in distribution activities ellll)loy
relatively few. people in their local operations.
During the 1970's a significant a.umber of new industrial firms, the
majority of which were associated with distribution of materials and
· goods, located in the industrial t:ract. This trend suggests t:hat the
location and access characteristics of the industrial tract are highly
desirable . TYl)ically, firms providing comon carrier and freight transportation services require highly accessible locations to both metrol)olitan and regional service areas.

54

�This page was revised April ot l983
Dec. of l98~

TABLE I-l
MAJOR BUS'lliESS ESTABLISHMENTS LOCATED IN DEI.TA TOWNSHIP' S INDUSTRIAL TRACT

Construction and Related Activities

Distribution

Clark. Foundation Couq,any
Douglas Steel
Jacklin Steel
T.R. Noyce Construction Company
Rieth-Riley Construction Company
Shreve Steel Company
rem' s Asphalt Paving Company

General Trucking
Alvan Motor Freight
Associated Truck. Lines
Blue ArTow Inc.
Bruce Cartage
Central Transport Inc.
Interstate System
Robin Transport
Transcon Lines
Tucker Freight T..ines
United Trucking Service

Warehousing
Auto-Owners Warehouse
Coca-Cola Company
Farm Bureau Warehouse
General Motors Pares Distribution Center
Hi-Klas Beverage
Lansing Storage Company
Manufacturers Service Co~oration
Meijer Distribution Center
Nabisco Warehouse
P,:-ecision Parts
Sherriff Goslin Company
Stevens ~an T..ines

Truck. Rental
Atlas Truck Rental and Leasing
Keena Truck. Leasing
Ryder Truck. Rental and Leasing
Grain Elevators
Millett Elevator Company
Rals~on Purina Company

Wholesaling
Miscellaneous
Central Dairy Supply
Flint Pipe and Well Supply
Kendall Electric Company

A-1 Auto Parts
Cante~n Services
Central Michigan Lumber Couq,any
Tony M's Lounge/Baldwin's Party Store
Chemstyle/Dahlmer
Lansing Sash and Door
Michigan Ash Sales

Light Manufacturing
Air-Lift Company
Diamond Manufacturing
Heavv Manufacturing
Detroit News Printing Facility
Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant
Utilities and Railroads
Erick.son Generating Station
Grand Trunk Western Railroad

54A

�Industrial Tract
Land Inventory
Approximately fifty percent of the land within the Delta Industrial Tract
has been developed or is committed to existing industries. The industrial
tract consists of soma 2100 acres of land area, of which approximately
1,000 acres are developed or are now being develo~ed. Among the largest
land users are the Enck.sou Electric Generating Station (305 acres),
Meijer Distribution Complex (250 acres), Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant (230
acrt&gt;~), C-..et'leral Motors Parts Warehouse ( 195 acres) , Coca-Cola (30 acres)
and the Detroit News (12 acres). Industrial-warehousing uses have consumed an estimated 100 acres per year of vacant land during the 1972-1980 period.
Industrial Development Activity in
the Lansing Metro Area
During the 1970's, Delta Township attracted a significant number of industrial warehousing firms. In the 1972-1977 period, approxi.lilately 27,000
square feet of manufacturing space was constructed in the Township. During this same time approximately c:wo million square feet of warehousing
space was constructed. In the late l970's, the following major projects
were constructed within the industrial tract: Oldsmobile Plant Number
Five (1,000,000 square feet), the General Motors Parts Warehouse addition (825,000 square feet), Meijer Hardlines Distribution Building (415,000 square feet), Coca-Cola Warehouse (85,000 square feet) and the Detroit
News printing f~cility (J0,000 square feet).
!I

P~ojectiou of Future Industrial Development Potential
analysis. and projection of industrial, warehousing and distribution
economic paten eial will be car~i~d out in four steps. First, at c-en tion
will be directed to the overall structure of the Lansing Tri-County
Region's economy. Secondly, consideration will be given to those special
features of the Tri-County economic structure which are important to
industrial, warehousing and distribution economic potential. Thirdly,
regional employment trends in industrial and wholesaling trades will be
analyzed. Finally, projections of future Tri-County industrial and
wholesaling employment will be presented and analyzed in order to determine future development potential for Delta Township.
An

Tri-County Regional
Economic Structure
The economy of the Tri-County Region is based upon three key elements:
state government,- higher education and automobile manufac curing. Having
an economy based on three such diversified elements has benefit~d the
Lansing area in terms of economic balance and stability that would not
be possible in a oore narrowly-based economy. Furthermore, this economic
structure has enabled the Lansing Metropolitan Area to take advantage of
national growth trends in the three key economic sectors of government:,
education and industry and thereby evolve as the economic hub of central
~chigan during the post World War rwo period.
Features of the Tri-County regional economy which have a bearing on the
potential for future industrial development are primarily related to the
skills and expertise which exist within the ~etropolitan Lansing Area.
55

�The region has facilir:ies and personnel reqw.red for basic research
operations. Furthermore, ir: has a good supply of skilled craf~man
capable of participating in a brnad range of manufacturing activities.
These asser:s shoul.d assure r:h.e region steady growch over future
dacalies.

~

The durable goods industry of the Lansing Metropolitan Area revolves
around r:he production of transportation eqw.pmant. Despice conscious
efforts to decentralize r:ha automabile manufacturing industry, the
Lansing area complex of transportation-affiliated induscrtes is expected to retain its national importance as a major automcbile manufacturing canter. Future expansion of automobile affiliated industrtas
in r:he Tri-County Reg:i.on is expected to depend on national econom:i.c and.
population trends and local and state governmantal policies.
While automobile manufacturing and its ancillary industrtas form tha
mainstay of the Lansing Metropolitan Area manufacturing community, there
are numerous non-&lt;iurable indus cries. Kay non-durables in r:ha Lansing
area are generally the ones classified as central place industries.
Central place industries are characterized by strong cies to local and
regional markets that can 'be served from a central place. Thay are ct...
pendent upon a highly competitive mark.et. Tha Maijer Distribution Canter
is an example of a central place industry since it operates co servi.ce
metropolitan and regional retail outlets of r:he parent company.
A feature of r:he Tri-County Region which is very import:ant co its potencial as a warehousing and distribucion cencer is ics strategic location
in cha lower central portion of Michigan. As already indicated~ r:ha
network of modern highways that link Lansing wich other pari:s of Cha
state enhance chis posicion. Air and rail r:ransportation facilicias in
r:he Lansing natropolican Area also help co strengthen r:his potential.
fiaving analy,:ed the general structure of cha Tri-Councy regional economy
and having evaluated those special features of the Tri-County Region
which have a 'bearing on potential industrial, warehousing and distribucion develop111ant, we now cum co a considerai;ion of Tri-Councy regional.
manufaccuring and wholesaling employ,nent crends. Table t-2 indicates
chat manufacturing and wholesale employment crends show small, 'but signi~
ficant, gains in manufacturing and wholesale employ,nent becween r:ha years
1965 and 1978. Despite chase gains, r:he tables show that manufacturing
and wholesale employ,nenc has lagged 'behind total non-farm employ,uent.
Manufacturing and wholesale employ,nenc grew 'by l l and 33 percenc, raspeccively, 'between che years 1965 and 1978. Ac Che same r:ime government and retail employment increased 146 and 70 percent, respeccively.
Evaluation of the foregoing trends in manufacturing and wholesale employmane must 'be cempered wich Che realization that che Cima period during
which Chey developed Sal-' a national shift in ~mploy,nent away from manufacturing towards retail crade. Furthermore, during the same time period,
local development~ included significanc expansion in r:he operacions of
'both Michigan Seate University and state government. !n view of these
faces, Tri-County manufacturing and wholesale employ,uent crends shoul.d
be read for their absolute growth. The fact that manufacturing and
, . . . _._,_
wholesale employt11ent failed co gain as a proportion of total employ,nent
should not be caken as an indicacion chat these t:wo sectors of the
Lansing economy are wichouc vicalicy. tndeed, che future portends slow
56

'1

�but steady growth in both of these areas.
Projection of Manufacturing
and Wholesale Employment
Table 1-3 presents projected manufacturing and wholesale employment projections for the Tri-County Region developed by the Tri-County Regional
Planning Commission. This projection is based upon expected changes in
the structure of the national economy and on past and proposed trends in
Tri-County economic development.
The projected Tri-County employment shown in Table 1-3 was developed during 1977 by the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission. The: entire region was divided into 465 traffic zones. Using statewide growth projections, the Tri-County allocation of state growth, and knowledge of local
land development trends, land use assignments were made within each traffic zone. Employment, a key factor in traffic generation, was also developed for each traffic zone based on TCRPC employment projections and
assignments to each zone.
Regional employment and economic development trends do not provide sufficient detail for proper analysis of economic change within Delta Township. Using the traffic zone socio-economic data, traffic zones 91, 92,
93 and 94 represent the geographic area of Delta Township's Industrial
Tract, previously discussed. Table I-4 presents the summary of these
four traffic zones as to projected manufacturing and wholesale employment which may be expected by 1985 and the year 2000.
TABLE I-2
TRI-COUNTY REGION EMPLOYMENT CHANGES
1965-1978
1965-1978
Percent Change

1965

19 74

1978

Manufacturing Employment

40,941

33,383

41,400

1. l

Retail Employment

16,192

24, 177

29,000

79. 1

Government Employment

27,653

49,550

68,100

146. 3

Other*

34,376

40,849

45,800

33.3

119. 162

147,959

184,JOO

54.6

TOTAL
Sources:

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission
Michigan Employment Security Commission

*Wholesale employment estimated at 15 % of the "other employment" category
based on projections by TCRPC and Robert Gladstone Associates .

57

�TABLE I-3
PROJECTIONS OF MANUFACTURING AND WHOLESALE EMPLOYMENT
IN THE TRI-COUNTY AREA

Manufacturing
Wholesale
Source:

1978

1985

2000

1978-2000
Percent Change

41,400

39,872

43,510

5.0

6,800

7,300

9,700

42.6

Final 1985 and 2000 Traffic Zone Socio-Economic Data, TCRPC,
1977
TABLE I-4
PROJECTIONS OF MANUFACTURING AND WHOLESALE
EMPLOYMENT IN THE DELTA INDUSTRIAL TRACT
1974-2000
Percent Change

19 74

1985

2000

Manufacturing

758

1,865

2,865

277. 9

Wholesale

105

252

549

422.8

Source:

1985 and 2000 Traffic Zone Socio-Economic Data (1977),
Tri-County Regional Planning Commission
Delta Township Planning Department

Since raw projection of employment provides no indication of future land
consumption, it was deemed necessary to determine average employment density for manufacturing and wholesale activities, then compute raw land
requirements by dividing projected employment by ' employment density,
thereby obtaining a rough notion of land consumption. Table I-5 presents the results of this calculation.
Table I-5 indicates some 200 acres of new land will be needed for industrial-wholesale enterprises in the 1981-2000 period. When compared with
1972-1977 economic expansion in the industrial tract, approximately 120
acres per year, the forecast seems highly conservative. However, 1972
through 1977 was an extraordinary period of economic expansion due primarily to the advent of the Meijer Distribution Center and the General
Motors Parts Warehouse expansion. Absent these two enterprises, the
rate of economic expansion whould have been significantly lower.

'
58

�TABLE I-5

j

PROJECTED LAND CONSU11PTION FOR MANUFACTURING AND
WHOLESALE ACTIVITIES IN THE DELTA INDUSTRIAL TRACT
Employment
Change

Employees
Per Acre

Additional
Acres

1974-1985
Manufacturing

15

958

63

Wholesale

10

14 7

,.
1.)

1986-2000
Manufacturing
Wholesale

13

1,149

88

9

297

33

Competitiv~ Position of Delta Township in
Attracting Industry Within the Tri-County Region
The industrial tract of Delta Township contains approximately 11.00 acres
of vacant, not yet committed, land. When compared to the estimated 200
acres of land needed for manufacturing-wholesale uses by the year 2000,
this amount of land appears to be an excessive reserve, even perhaps
speculative. However, several factors suggest the current boundaries of
the industrial tract, as depicted in Figure I-I, should b_e retained;
they are:
1.

The strong influx of new industry during the past decade
suggests the industrial tract is favorably located for
transportation-distribution dependent industry.

2.

The present limits of the industrial tract form a logical
transition between industry and other land uses.

3,

The industrial tract provides an area with land reserves
sufficient to accommodate post-2000 economic expansion.

4.

The Township has maintained a consistent pro-economic
expansion philosophy, evidenced by sizable investments
for utilities and roads in the industrial tract and
creation of the Delta Township Economic Development
Corporation. Continued promotion of economic growth
by Township officials could result in increased land consumption for industrial uses.

5.

Industrial firms have recently sought to purchase tracts
larger than their immediate needs would dic~ate to accommodate future conditions and to ensure a measure of privacy
since many manufacturing concerns have been the object of
nuisance claims due to noise, smoke, dust, vibration and
the like.

59

�III

Conclusions
1.

The Del ta Township Comprehensive Plan, 19 7 3 Edition, recommended reservation of some 2100 acres of land for present
and future industrial and related uses. The Delta Industrial Tract has evolved consistently with this recommendation.
Although designation of this amount of land for future development exceeds the projected potential requirements of
200 industrial acres, it is believed that the Township
should provide for industrial expansion which may occur
beyond the twenty-year projection period of the Plan.
Also, the future location of a limited number of very large
industries within Delta Township could measurably increase
the amount of new industrial development in the Township and
thereby increase the amount of land required.

2.

Delta Township should continue with planning and construction of utilities, roads and essential services within the
industrial tract, thus maintaining its advantages in the
Lansing Metropolitan area as to providing services.

3.

Delta Township should receive a significant proportion of
the new economic expansion occurring within the Tri-County
Region to the year 2000. Favorable location, accessibility,
sound utility system, comparable tax rates and incentives
now offered via tax abatement and public financing all contribute to this conclusion.

4.

Township officials should carefully monitor new enterprises
to ensure compatibility with existing industrial activity,
adequacy of utilities, proper fire protection and that needed
private services are maintained. Such private services
should include retail and personal services conveniently
located near the industrial tract to serve the large number of employees projected. Fast-food, drive-'i.n bankinf,,
personal services and certain professional services are
typically found on the fringe of major employment areas.

60

�This page revised Dec. of 1984

XI

•

Mass Transit Service in Delta Township
In January of 1972 the Capital Area Transportation Authority (CATA) was
formed under Act 55 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1963, through a petition by the City of Lansing. CATA provided transit service to Delta
Township during the late 1970's and early 1980's with financial subsidies
being provided by the Township. The CATA system provided service pri_marily to activity centers along West Saginaw Highway. In April of 1984
CATA discontinued transit service to the Township which was replaced ·by a
line haul service operated by the Eaton County Transportation Authority
(EATRAN).
EATRAN began operation on October 1, 1980 under a contract with the
Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). In 1981 Delta Township
joined EATRAN which is a demand response bus system which constantly
changes the way the buses are dispatched as customer demand changes.
EATRAN services the entire Eaton County area while specializing in commuter express trips, and medical trips for senior citizens and handicappers into the Lansing Area. Approximately 70% of EATRAN's riders
are on a permanent reservation, that is they utilize the system at the
same time on a regular basis.
Table T-5 illustrates ridership figures for the EATRAN system in Eaton
County and Delta Township. EATRAN ridership has been stable in the past
in Delta Township and has experienced annual increases country-wide .
Decreases in ridership took place in 1984 due to a 20% reduction in
service hours. It is anticipated that Delta Township's percentage of
ridership will increase due to the initiation of limited line haul service by EATRAN in Delta Township in 1984.
TABLE T-5
EATRAN RIDERSHIP

% of Ridership in
Year*
1980-1981
1981-1982
1982-1983
1983-1984**

Eaton County

Delta Township

89,452
101,710
131,053
77 , 580

10,950
7,377
13,644
7,435

Delta Township
12%
7%

10%

9½%

*Period is October to October
**Period is October 1983 thru April 1984
EATRAN is presently providing demand response, line haul service and
commute express services to the Township. EATRAN demand response and line
haul services connect to the CATA system at the southeast corner of the
Edgemont Plaza in Lansing Township. EATRAN line haul route times are
presently coordinated with CATA Route Number Three which traverses Willow Highway.

84

�This page revised Dec. of 1~
XII

Railroad Facilities Serving Delta Township
The Chesapeake and Ohio and the Grank Trunk Western are the two railroad
lines with tracks running through Delta Township. The Chesapeake and
Ohio track cuts across the extreme northwest corner of the Township, but
does not provide direct service to the Township. Two Grand Trunk Western
tracks cut across the southeast corner of the Township parallel to U.S.
27. The tracks are part of a main line route serving Chicago, Port
Huron, Toronto and intermediate cities. The Lansing yard located at
Snow Road and Pierson Highway is Grand Trunk Western's headquarters and
main marshalling yard in the Lansing Metropolitan Area.
Grank Trunk Western facilities and services in Delta Township represent
one of the most important transportation assets in the Lansing Metropolitan Area . The Lansing yard consists of 13 switching tracks with automated controls and is a central assembly and dispatch point for railroad
cars destined for all parts of the country . Grank Trunk Western serves
the following Delta Township industrial type facilities.
Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Plant
Lansing Board of Water &amp; Light ' s Erickson Station
Meijers Distribution Center
Millett Elevator Company
Ralston Purina Company
Grank Trunk Western has indicated a willingness to provide additional spur
service to new industries desiring to locate in the Township's industrial
tract. The Grank Trunk Western Railroad tracks carry approximately 15
tra i ns per day in each direction, making Grank Trunk Western the major
r ail line in the Lansing area. Grand Trunk Western has eliminated the
passenger service it once provided to the Township.

85

.

7

f~

�Since August of 1975 the Grand Trunk Western has operated an automotive
compound, lo:i.o"tvtl as Autoport, which is located on Snow Road adjacent to
the railroad's main line. This facility was designed as an intermodal
distribution center for both American and foreign-made automobiles.
Vehicles are transported by rail from either the assembly plant or the
U.S. port of entry to Autoport and then trucked to dealerships in
Michigan cities and surrounding out-state areas. In the first four
years of operation, over 100,000 vehicles were transported through
this facility.

-

From a railroad track layout perspective alone, most of Delta Township's
industrial tract could be served by the Grand Trunk. The Grand Trunk
Railroad plans to extend a railroad spur from the existing Meijer lead,
which traverses the middle of Section 26 in a north-south direction,
eastwardly three quarters of a mile to the Autoport facility which is
located in Section 25. The potential also exists to serve the eastern
halves of Sections 27 and 34 off of the Oldsmobile lead.
Future railroad service to Delta Township is difficult to project.
Recent national railroad trends have evidenced the elimination of some
passenger and freight service to various parts of the country. The
most important local trends affecting freight service to Delta Township
will be the pace of development in the Township's industrial triangle
and in other industrial areas served oj, ·the Grand Trunk Western line.
Past increases in freight traffic suggest that the future will witness
moderate growth.
XIII

Air Service to Delta Township
Capital City Airport is located near the northeast corner of Delta Township, north of Grand River Avenue in Clinton County. The airport provides commercial passenger, freight and general -aviation service to the
Lansing Metropolitan area. The 1600 acre airport is served at present
by three major airlines; United, Republic and Piedmont. There are also
two commuter airlines serving the Lansing Metropolitan area; Simmons
and Freedom. These four airlines currently have 30 regularly scheduled
flights per day to such major cities as New York, Chicago, Detroit,
Denver, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Cleveland and Washington, DC. In 1978
United and Republic airline flights into and out of Capital City Airport
carried 448,260 passengers, an increase of 58 percent since 1972.
A total of 163,032 flights occurred at Capital City Airport in 1978.

General aviation activicy accounted for 88% of this total or 147,205
flights. Capital City Airport general aviation activity includes business, charter, survey and patrol flights, crop dusting, instructional
and pleasure flying.
Besides the main terminal facility, there are office, industrial, commercial, hangar, maintenance, crash/fire/rescue and classroom buildings
located at Capital City Airport. The airport serves as the air transportation hub for Michigan State government, Michigan State University
and many private businesses in the Lansing area as well as Delta 'Township

86

�This page revised Dec. of ~ 4
XIII

Air Service-to Delta Township
Capital City Airport is located in and adjacent to the northeast corner
of Delta Township, primarily north of North Grand River Avenue in Clinton
County.

~

Toe airport provides commercial air transportation, air freight and general aviation services to the Lansing Metropolitan area. The 1700 acre
airport is currently served by three major airlines : United, Republic
and Piedmont along with two commuter airlines: Simmons and Freedom.
These carriers provided 30-35 flights to such major cities as New York,
Boston, Washington, D.C., Atlanta, Miami, Dallas-Fort Worth, Denver,
Chicago, Detroit, Milwaukee, los Angeles, San Francisco and Phoenix.
Air travel from Lansing pe~ked in 1978 and 1979 with 448,260 passengers
in 1978 and 444,224 passengers in 1979. Table T-6 illustrates passenger
activity in 1983 increased 36% over the act i vity in 1982. The passenger
activity for 1984 is expected to stay the same as 1983 or increase
slightly. Lansing's Capital City Airport has historically been the third
or fourth busiest airport in the State of Michigan, periodically changing
places with Saginaw's Tri-City Airport behind Detroit Metropolitan Airport and Kent County International Airport in Grand Rapids. Approximately 85-90% of the air traffic at Capital City Airport is general
aviation activity which is comprised of business, charter, survey, crop
dusting, patrol flights, instructional and pleasure flights to name a
few.
Early in 1981, a new and expanded modern terminal facility was put into
use with full second level loading through passenger loading bridges and
a large new baggage claim area. The Terminal Building also houses state
and federal offices related with air transportation and airport development as well as a restaurant, airline and rental car offices, and two
travel agency offices. ·
Located at Capital City Airport are many businesses and offices, both
commercial and industrial. Capital City Airport serves as the air transportation hub for Michigan State Government, Michigan State University,
and the many private businesses in the Greater Lansing area. The numerous hotels located in Delta Township serve as major support facilities
for travelers utilizing the airport. Commercial and industrial businesses i n Delta Township have direct access to air transportation and
air cargo facilities at Capital City Airport.
In 1975 a new Master Plan was prepared for the full development of
Capital City Airport . That plan has been completely developed for the
f i rst phase of expansion and construction. Since 1975 many changes
have taken place nationally which have created the need for the Master
Plan to be updated for today's situation and economy . In late 1984 a
master plan consultant will be engaged to conduct a new updated study
and provide the Capital Region Airport Authority with direct i on for
future development.

87

~-

�This page revised Dec. of 1984

TABLE T-6
PASSENGER ACTIVITY
CAPITAL CITY AIRPORT
DEPLANED
PASSENGERS

ENPLANED
PASSENGERS

TOTAL
PASSENGERS

1979

224,178

220,046

444,224

1980

188,151

180 , 302

368,453

1981

133,038

123,767

256,805

YEAR

CHANGE
-17%
-30%
+ 1%

1982

172,315

129,779

257,094

1983

177,255

172,858

350, 113

DATA SOURCE :

+36%

Capital Region Airport Authority

-~

87a

..I

�XIV

Non Motorized Transportation
The use of bicycles as an alternative means of transportation has risen
dramatically in the 1970's due to the ever-increasing cost of gasoline
and the threat of reduced supplies. Bicycles represent a practical
energy conservation measure while providing door-to-door convenience
and efficiency, as a practical mode of transportation, particularly in
urban areas.
As part of a large urban area, Delta Township should provide for the

growing needs of bicycle users in the Township. The Planning and
development of a bicycle path system in ~elta Township should be
regionally coordinated in order to create an efficient bicycle route
system throughout the Tri-County area. Engineering standards for
constructing bicycle paths as developed by federal and State Departments of Transportation Officials should be utilized to avoid conflicts
in connecting bicycle paths with adjoining municipalities.
There are baiscally three types of bicyclists. The first group is
children who use the bicycle extensively on low traffic residential
streets. The second group is the average adult rider who usually rides
close to home on local streets and generally is uncomfortable traveling
long distances on heavily traveled streets. The third group is the
experienced bicyclist who travels high volume arterials, generally keeps
up with traffic in urbanized areas at a pace of 10-15 miles per hour and
frequently travels relatively long distances of 10-20 miles.
Each of the aforementioned groups has unique bicycling characteristics
and therefore requires different types of bicycle facilities to satisfy
its needs. Children who commute to schools, parks and playgrounds can
often be served by low volume local streets. Average adult cyclists
generally feel comfortable on low volume streets and frequently prefer
off-road recreational paths. The commuter bicyclist is oriented towards
utilitarian bicycle trips and generally prefers on-road routes which
offer the shortest distance between travel points.
Due to the fact that the majority of bicyclists now utilize the roadway,
with the exception being children who generally use sidewalks, greater
emphasis should be placed on reducing motorist-bicyclist conflicts.
Many Delta Township streets cannot adequately accommodate bicyclists due
to poor vertical and horizontal alignments, narrow traffic lanes, and
inadequate shoulders. This situation is especially critical in the
vicinity of schools.
·

'

In planning for non-motorized transportation in the Township, consideration should be given to developing bicycle lanes in conjunction with
new road construction, improvements to existing roads, and the installation of bicycle/equestrian paths along utility easements. Many bike
paths could be developed via these methods without significant additional funding. Bicycle lanes could also be constructed along the
Carrier Creek and Grand River green belts as designated on the Future
Land Use Map. One source of funding for bicycle path construction could
be the Eaton County Road Commission which was authorized in 1979 to
appropriate one percent of its funds for non-motorized transportation
projects by an amendment to the Michigan Motor Vehicle Fund (Act 51 of -~
the Public Acts of 1951).

88

�•

During 1979-1980 a Bicycle Transportation Plan was prepared by the
Tri-County Regional Planning Commission. This Plan contains regional
bicycling goals and objectives, a description of existing bicycle facilities, a review of local bicycle ordinances, and an analysis of education programs and engineering studies. The report also contains an
appraisal of major Delta Township streets which were examined by experienced members of the Tri-County Bicycle Association regarding the
street's suitability for safe bicycling.
A sidewalk network to serve pedestrians should also be considered as
part of a non-motorized transportation plan for the Township. The
existing sidewalk system does not meet the needs of Township residents.
Sidewalks do not exist to serve students commuting to schools forcing
them to use roadways and creating a dangerous situation par t icularly
for young children . Pedestrian-auto conflicts also occur in commercial
areas due to the lack of sidewalks.
In planning a sidewalk network, emphasis should be on the creation of a
safe means of access for pedstrians to activity centers within the Township such as schools, parks and commercial areas. Priorities for sidewalk construction should be based on pedestrian volume to these activity
centers.
Funding for sidewalk construction is available through such state authorized means as the creation of special assessment districts or the levying
of a special millage •

•

89

�This page revised Dec. of 1984
WATER SERVICE

•

The previously documented growth which Delta has experienced has resulted
in increased demands for municipal services including the provision of a
public water supply. Because the Township has only provided this service
for the past two decades the water supply system has experienced the
advantages of the improved technology of the past twenty years.
In order to maintain the high quality of the municipal services presently
provided, the Township must continually evaluate the water supply and distribution system in terms of its ability to meet present and future water
supply demands. This chapter describes the existing water system, provides projected water consumption figures and depicts future water service areas.
I

Historical Information
The existing water supply system was initiated during 1957 with water
being purchased from Lansing Township. Water mains were installed in
three subdivisions; Knolls, Clairborne Heights and Huntington Acres. The
Lansing Board of Water and Light operated the system until the late 19SO's
when Delta Township purchased these water lines from the Board of Water
and Light.
In 1963 the Township began to establish its own water supply system. -During this time the 500,000 gallon elevated storage tank on Snow Road was
constructed, 100,000 feet of water mains were installed and water Wells
#1 and #2 were installed. These facilities served the area generally
located between Waverly and Elmwood Roads. Major expansions to the
system were initiated in October of 1965 and were completed in the spring
of 1966. Well #3 was added to the system during this time and minor subdivision extensions, paid for by individual developers, were installed.
Well #4 was constructed in 1968. In September of 1969 the State of
Michigan entered into an agreement with the Township for water service to
the State Secondary Complex located in Windsor Township adjacent to
Delta's southern boundary.

•

Additional water supply wells have been constructed in order to meet increasing water consumption demands. Well #5 was put into service during
the summer of 1970, Well #6 in 1973, Well #7 in 1975, Well #8 in 1977, and
Hell #9 in 1984. Since 1969, major new additions to the water service
area have taken place. In 1975, Water District #5 provided service west
of Creyts Road along Willow Highway and along Canal Road between Willow
and Saginaw Highway. In 1978-1979 District #4 was established which provided service along Creyts Road between I-496 and Millett Highway.
Improvements in this area also included the construction of a 1.25
million gallon ground storage structure near the Creyts Road/Millett Highway intersection. In 1982 Water District #6 was established which provided service along Creyts Road between Millett Highway and U.S. 27.
II

•

Description of Existing Water Service System
Existing Distribution System
The Township's water system service area lies within an area best
described as bounded by Waverly Road on the east, the Grand River on the
north, Interstate 96 on the west and on the south by the southern Township boundary. The major exception is service to the State of Michigan
90

�DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure W•I ·
EXISTING WATER
SERVICE AREA
(19841

ISi

TRANSMISSION MAIN

[Q] WATER STORAGE
[Q] WATER WELL

.......

°'

1\

-

NORTH

ti&gt;

0

REVISE(

1000

/84

2000

4000

�This page revised Dec. of 1984
Secondary Complex within Windsor Township. The existing water system
service area is illustrated on Figure W-I. A majority of water mains in
the distribution system have been constructed within the past ten years
and were largely installed as ductile iron pipe. With only minor exception, all mains are at least six inches in diameter. The system, being
comparatively new and largely constructed with ductile iron pipes, is in
good physical condition and has a long-term life expectancy.
The present system of feeder or transmission mains looped along section
lines consists largely of eight, ten and twelve inch mains. While these
larger mains have adequate water flow properties, they have been installed at one mile intervals which is wider than the one half mile
spacing recommended by the American Water Works Association. The transmission mains along portions of Creyts and Elmwood Roads are presently
undersized. The installation of a 16" water main in the vicinity of
Creyts Road and the construction of a 1.25 million gallon water storage
facility helped remedy the water pressure inadequacy by reinforcing the
transmission grid. As of 1984, the water distribution system consisted
of approximately 91 miles of water mains.
The water distribution system provides two primary services; (1) domestic
consumption water and (2) fire protection. Discussion in later passages
deals with consumption requirements. present and future. Provision of
adequate fire protection is dependent upon adequately sized water transmission mains and adequate initial pressure at the well supply. Fire
flow requirements are based upon building size, spacing between buildings, type of construction and the provision of sprinkler systems. Minimum standards have been established as to the required gallons per minute
(GPM) needed to fight a fire and put it out. Many buildings in Delta
require 3000 GPM with a limited number as high as 6000 GPM.
As the water distribution system is expanded in response to future
development, Delta Township should strive to coordinate future water
main construction with the goal of strengthening the present transmission network. This approach will be particularly effective in portions
of the Township which are only partially developed. That is, transmission mains can be constructed in terms of anticipated demands of these
growing neighborhoods. The last section of this chapter provides
approximate locations of proposed future transmission mains together
with service area boundaries.
Water Supply
The water system has nine wells supplying water into the distribution
system. These wells tap sandstone aquifers at depths ranging from 363
to 450 feet. The estimated combined maximum capacity of the eight wells
is over 4800 GPM or 6.91 million gallons per day. This production cannot
be maintained at maximum levels due to water draw down effects in the
aquifers and the need to maintain the wells. Total well production can
generally be maintained at 3,800 GPM or S .4 •million gallons per day.
Table W-1 provides data regarding the existing production wells.

92

�This page revised Dec. of 1984

'I

TABLE W-1
EXISTING WATER WELLS, DELTA TOWNSHIP
Well
No.

Year
Installed

DeEth

Diameter

1

1963

426'

12 II

300

2

1963

450'

12 II

300

3

1966

390 I

12 II

300

4

1968

370'

16"

600

5

1970

423'

15 II

600

6

1972

363'

15"

800

7

1976

267'

16 II

268

8

1976

298 11

16"

840

9

1984

440'

16 II

800

Water Productzo~
Rating in GPM l

(l)Well production is indicative of the amount of water each
well pumps from the ground in gallons per minute (GPM).
The nine water supply wells in the Township's water system tap the Parma
Sandstone formation lying some 350-450 feet below land surface. Rock
aquifers such as the Parma formation provide lower water yields than
glacial drift aquifers, but are less susceptible to the effects of contamination from surface sources. These rock wells are deeper than wells
in glacial drift and have overlying strata which slows the recharge from
surface waters. Rock aquifers are often highly mineralized, containing
high concentrations of iron, maganese and hardness.
Wells 1-3 are connected by water mains along Michigan Avenue. Water
from Wells 2 and 3 is combined with Water Well 1 at which point chlorine
is added as a disinfecting agent. Wells 4, 6 and 8 connect to an isolation main which enables chlorine to be added at a free-standing building on the wastewater treatment plant site. Sodium hexameta-phosphate
is added at each well prior to chlorination to stabilize the iron found
in the water. All other wells are connected directly to the water
system with chlorination and iron stabilization provided at each. Delta
Township does not add fluoride to the water system.
Water Storage
The function of water storage in a public water supply system is threefold; it provides (1) a temporary source of water during electrical
power mechanical failure, (2) supplemental water supply during periods
of peak water demand and (3) fire protection capacity. The water system
contains two types of water storage, an elevated tower and a ground tank.
Elevated storage is most commonly used because of its reliability in
case of electrical or mechanical failure. Larger water systems include
ground storage equipped with variable speed pumps because of lower
capital investment requirements per gallon of storage, the provisions of
93

t;"

�This page was revised April of 1983
Dec. of 1984
easy access for repair, and the fact that ground storage facilities have
more aesthetic appeal than elevated storage tanks.
The Delta Township system has a 500,000 gallon elevated tank on the east
side of Snow Road just ~orth of St. Joe Highway. This tank has a static
water pressure at its base of 59 pounds per square inch (PSI). A ground ·
storage tank, equipped with variable speed pumps, is located on the west
side of Creyts Road some 600 feet north of Millett Highway. · The tank
contains 1.25 million gallons of storage capacity and delivers water
into the 16 inch South Creyts transmission main. The ground storage
facility helps maintain 50-55 PSI in the south end of the water system
serving lands south of I-496.
Water Consumption
Table W-2 illustrates that water - consumption in Delta Township has
steadily increased in the past. A consistent pattern has emerged, that
being that approximately 45 percent of the total water consumed is
attributed to single family residences, 25 percent is consumed by commercial/office establishments, 20 percent is consumed by multi-family
residential developments, four percent is consumed by industry, 2%
by manufacturing with miscellaneous uses such as schools and churches
consuming the remaining four percent. It is expected that the amount
of water consumed by industrial and manufacturing establishments will
significantly increase as growth and development take place in the
Township industrial tract.
TABLE W-2
DELTA TOWNSHIP WATER CONSUMPTION
1977-1983
Customer Classes

Year

Annual
Single
MultiWater
Family
Family
Senior
Office
Special
Consumption Residential Residential Citizens Commercial Category*

1977

589,543,680

1978

638,522,720

1979

652,824,480

1980

647,782,960

Industrial Hanufacturir

1981** 695,000,000
1982

749,127,960 318,522,635 127,587,033 657,118 241,645,888 9,436,992 35,058,161

16,119,998

1983

790,726,510 348,127,203 152,869,732 293,141 194,453,595 10,191,275 38,657,612

20,864,936

*Special category includes institutional uses such as schools, churches, etc.
* *Estimate
~

-

94

�This page was revised April of 1983
Dec. of 1984
Fire Flows
As suggested previously, one major problem with the water distribution
system is the undersized water transmission mains spaced on one-mile
intervals. Historically, fire underwriters have identified municipal
fire flow requirements using empirical formulas based upon resident
population in the service areao With increasing sophistication of
water supply systems and fire fighting apparatus, new criteria have
been adopted which recognize the types of structure and density of
develppment. In 1977, the Township Engineering Department calculated
fire flows for existing major buildings, a partial listing of which is
included in Table W-3.
Table W-3
RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOWS
Recommended
Fire Flow

Duration of
Fire Flow

Village Green Apartments

6,000 GPM

6 hours

Lansing Mall

4; 500 GPM

4 hours

Plum Tree Apartments

4,000 GPM

4 hours

West Saginaw Plaza

2,750 GPM

2 hours

Michigan National
Bank Center

3,500 GPM

3 hours

Sea Hawk Restaurant

1,500 GPM

2 hours

Waverly High School

4,500 GPM

4 hours

Meijer (retail store)

3,000 GPM

3 hours

Hilton Inn

4,500 GPM

4 hours

Establishment

The addition of the 1.25 million gallon ground storage facility and the
installation of 12 and 16 inch transmission mains along Creyts Road
improved the water system's fire flow capability and duration of flow.
It should be noted that having fire flow capability in well production
and storage does not mean that recommended fire flow can be delivered
to the site of a fire. The distribution mains must be properly sized,
spaced, and looped to provide such fire flows at all locations in the
water service area.
A private firm, Insurance Services Office (ISO), grades municipal fire
systems throughout the United States. Many insurance companies in
Michigan base their fire insurance rates on information gathered by ISO.
The ISO rates fire systems on a scale from 1 to 10, with 1 representing
the best performance. No Michigan communities ranked by ISO score a 1
and many are rated at 8, 9 and 10. The cities of Detroit and Lansing
score a 2 and 3 respectively. Areas served by hydrants in Delta Township are rated at 8 while more rural areas without hydrants are rated
at 9. Representatives of the Michigan Insurance Bureau have stated
that residents in communities with ISO rankings of 8 to 10 pay 10 to 70
95

-~

�This page was revised April of 1983
Dec. of 1984
percent additional for fire insurance than areas with better grades.
Among the items considered by the ISO in their ranking are fire department equipment, staffing and training, fire prevention programs, building codes; reliability, flow and maintenance of the water system and
fire communications, including alarms.
III

Future Service Area
Figure W-II provided an indication of the future water system service
area _in increments of five years. This figure should not be construed
as identifying precise lands to be served during each time period. It
is intended to convey the general extent and location of service area
extensions based upon projected service demands. Figure W-II should
be viewed in conjunction with Figure SS-II presented in the Sanitary
Sewer Service Chapter as to the provision of both public water and
public sanitary sewer services to given areas of Delta Township.
There are extensive portions of the Township to which Township public
water services are not contemplated during the planning period. These
areas are generally described as follows:
(1)

All lands lying north of the Grand River and west of I-96.

(2)

The portion of the Township bounded by Interstate 96, Mt. Hope
Highway, the west Township boundary and the south Township boundary.

The water service limits represented in Figure W-II have been derived
so as to provide water service only to those areas where it is costeffective to do so. Moreover, the general strategy of providing service is to encourage fill-in of vacant land near or within existing
service area limits and to service existing residential development
areas west of Interstate I-96. It can be reasonably assumed that when
the network of wells and transmission mains west of Interstate 96 is
constructed, sufficient water supply capacity will exist to serve
development on presently vacant lands consistent with current land use
policies.

96

�DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure W·II
EXISTING &amp; PROPOSED
WATER SERVICE
AREA (1984)
[I]

EXISTING SERVICE

ii

Areas not anticipated
for public utilities

EEJ

1985-1990

EJ

1991-1995

filil1

POST 1995

r-O"I

IS] TRANSMISSIO N MAIN

IQ!

WATER

IQ!

WATER STORAGE

NORTH

WELL

II! l
11

1

·'

40 00

0

(

'~

REVISED 12 /84

2000

�This page revised Dec. of 1984
•

SA..~ITARY SEWER SERVICE
The tempo and location of land development within the Township is significantly affected by the availability and sanitary sewers. Given the
characteristics of soils within the Township, on-site disposal systems,
even for single-family detached homes, are not typically suitable. Thus
the extent of urban-type development which may occur in various are~s of
the Township is generally dependent on the provision of public utilities
including sanitary sewers. It should be noted that several areas within
the Township are presently not envisioned to receive sanitary sewer
service in the future.
Largely because of past growth and development within the Township, the
treatment of wastewater effluent has become an important ~ervice provided by Delta Township. Certain operating problems, together with increasing quantitites of wastewater resulting from the addition of customers to the sewer system, make prominent the need to anticipate appropriate capacity to treat wastewater entering the wastewater treatment
plant. Future improvements to the capacity of the wastewater treatment
plant will be based upon anticipated growth. Improvements will anticipate subsequent flow increases and thereby be cost-effective.
Delta Township contains slightly over 35 square miles of land area, less
than 30 percent of which is served by sanitary sewers. So as to control
growth within the bounds of the Land Use Plan, allow for orderly expansion of all municipal services, and to preclude over-zealous extension
of sanitary sewers to areas not now served, a series of five-year, shortterm phasing projections are set forth in the latter portion of this
chapter.
I.

Historical Information
Establishment of Sewer
Collection and Treatment
Service
The Delta Township Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on the north
side of Willow Highway, one-half mile east of Canal Road. The original
treatment plant was constructed in 1965 and designed to treat one
million gallons of wastewater per day. At the time of construction,
sanitary collection sewers were also constructed to serve developed portions of the Township. The orginal collection and treatment system was
financed by general obligation bonds and special assessments. The
original collection sewer system is known as Sanitary Sewer District #2
of 1965. Table SS-1 depicts construction dates and general locations of
the various sanitary sewer assessment districts in the Township. Figure
SS-I illustrates the Delta Township Sanitary Sewer Service· System as it
existed in 1984.
Wastewater Treatment
Plant Improvements
Since the original wastewater treatment plant was built in 1965, the
plant has been improved both as to capacity and quality of wastewater
treatment. In 1972, Delta Township contracted with the Eaton County
Board of Public Works for expansion of the treatment plant to provide
added capacity and secondary treatment of wastewater. Under the contract, Delta Township continues to operate, maintain and manage the
the treatment plant.
98

�DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure SS · 1
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE
AREA (19841

0

EXISTING SERVICE

ISJ

TRUNK SEWER

[ill WASTE WATER
TREATMENT PL ANT

O"I
O"I

,
.

NORTH

0

1000

2000

REV!St . 2/84

4000

�•
TABLE S·S-1
DELTA TOWNSHIP
SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
District
:Jumber

Year of
Construction

General Location

1965

Northeast portion of Delta Township

1967

Northeast portion of Delta Township

lt 3

1972

Gettysburg Estates, Farms and Farms West

#4

1972

Area south of Delta Mills

IF S

1975

Rockdale/Willow area

117

1975-77

Creyts Rd. near Millett Hwy.

1!8

1982

Creyts Rd. from Millett Hwy. to U.S. 27

1110

1983

Pierson/Sanders Roads

1116

' 1984

1119

1984

Saratoga Farms and Island Park Highlands

1/20

1984

Country Meadows Subdivision

1984

West Saginaw Hwy. west of Creyts Rd.

# 11

1985

Subdivisions west of I-96 between Willow
Hwy. and Mt. Hope Hwy.

II 12

1985

Home Acres Subdivision

lftZ

1121

&amp; 22

Millett Area

100

�Th.is page revised Dec. of 1984
In 1984 Delta Township received a federal grant of approximately $4.6
millon dollars for the installation of sanitary sewers to serve most of
the existing residential subdivisions located west of I-96 between
Willow Highway and Mt. Hope Highway. The remainder of the financing,
approximately $1.5 millon dollars, will be provided by assessments
levied on benefitting properties. Construction of the sewers, which
is scheduled for completion in 1985, will provide servic.e to approximately 750 existing single family homes.
Impact of the Federal
Clean Water Act
Present federal law, as set forth in the Federal Clean Water Act (Public
Law 92-500), seeks to achieve a high level o,f water quality in all of
the Nation's streams, lakes and coastal waters. The importance of careful planning in striving for improved water quality has become increasingly evident. Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
of 1972 affirm the importance of water quality planning and "mandate"
local governmental participation in cleaning up the nation's surface
waters. One such mandate is the requirement that a "201 Facility Plan"
be prepared by the local governmental jurisdiction and submitted to the
Environmental Protection Agency for its approval.
The "Facility Plan, 111 based on the requirements of Section 201 of Public
Law 92-500, proposed to develop an area-wide approach to improving municipal wastewater collection and treatment facilit;es and treatment
methods. The basic intent of the facility plan is to demonstrate the
need for any proposed facilities, to serve as a systematic evaluation of
feasible alternatives, and to demonstrate that proposed measures represent the most cost effective means of meeting established water quality
standards for wastewat_e r discharge at the treatmen_t plant.
"The Facility Plan represents established planning goals and future
wastewater collection treatment services. If fully implemented, the
Facility Plan would ultimately move Delta Township into an area-wide
sanitary sewer service system. Delta Township operates the largest
treatment and collection system in the facilit~ plan service area and
was the lead local government in the preparation process of the facility
Plan.
The projected sanitary sewer networks, presented herein, do not envision
accomplishment of all the 201 Facility Plan features within the time
frame of this Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is not areawide in that it does not include reco1IUI1endations for areas outside the
Township . Also, the Township areas which are to be provided sewers
within the specified time frame do not necessarily include those specified in the 201 Plan, nor do they adopt the same scheduling. However,
using Township projections for population growth and development, the
Comprehensive Plan recommends achievement of the standards for water
quality required by Public Law 92 - 500 within the necessary time per i od.
It is assumed that the proposed future sanitary sewer service areas will
be revised in the future in order to reflect participation by non-Delta
Township areas, adjustments to population projections, as well as the
consideration of land use trends not presently foreseen.
1The Facility Plan was completed during December of 1975 and sets forth
a regional service area. The report is entitled Delta, Windsor, Onieda,
and Eagle Townships, Village of Dimondale and City of .Gr~nd Ledge
Facility Plan for Regional Wastewater Treatment, Fishbeck, Thompson,
Carr and Huber, Consulting Engineers.
101

�•
•

This page revised Dec. of 1984
II

Description of Existing Sanitary Sewer
Collection and Treatment Facilities
Sanitary Sewer
Collection System
As stated earlier, the first sanitary collection sewers were constructed
in Delta Township during the 1965-1967 period and were designed to serve
large areas within the northeastern portion of the Township. The
Carrier Creek Interceptor carries wastewater from collection sewers
throughout the central portion of the Township to the wastewater treatment . plant. Additionally, the Carrier Creek Interceptor serves Delta's
Industrial Tract and the State Secondary Complex in Windsor Township.
The sewer extensions listed in Table SS-1 were financed through the
creation of sewer assessment districts. A number of other extensions,
including those to the Verndale Complex and Delta Industrial Park, have
been financed by the individual developments which benefited from the
sewer extension. The existing collection sewer system consists of
pipes varying in size from four inches to 36 inches in diameter comprising a total of approximately 84 miles of sewer lines and eight sewage
pump stations.
Wastewater
Treatment Plant
The original wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was constructed in 1965
and had a capacity of one millon gallons per day. During the period of
1970 to 1972 the plant was expanded to an average daily wastewater flow
of four million gallons with a maximum hydraulic capacity of eight
million gallons per day. The plant presently treats an average daily
flow of 2.5 million gallons of wastewater and serves 4600 customers.

III

Future Service Areas for the
Wastewater Collection and Treatment System
Projected Growth of Service
The increase in demand for sanitary sewer service is directly linked
with the increase in resident population. However, the extension of
sanitary sewers is dependent on physical and financial constraints.
This section provides projections of sanitary sewer service demand, proposed sewer service areas, and the periods of time in which the service
is likely to be provided. Integration with other elements of the
Comprehensive Plan is provided by utilizing population projections, land
consumption rates and land .use as set forth in chapters one and t-wo.
Table SS-2 presents actual rates of new customer connections for the
past seven years. These rates, together with anticipated expansion of
service described in a later section, form the basis for projecting
sanitary sewer customers as illustrated in Table SS-3.
Once the projection of future sanitary sewer customers was completed,
it was necessary to further refine the projections in terms of customer
equivalents and expected wastewater flow at the treatment plant. Table
SS-4 provides the results of this evaluation.

102

�This page was revised: April of ~ 9B3
Dec. of 1984 :,
TABLE SS-2

~
,,-

SANITARY SEWER CUSTOMERS*
1975-1983
1982

1983

3950

4016

3970

210

224

231

25

26

Customer Class

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

Single-Family
Residential

3220

3260

3500

3530

3860

100

120

130

140

190

MultipleFamily
Residential

1981**

Special
Category***
OfficeCommercial

230

270

300

330

360

430

165

350

Industrial

1

6

5

5

5

11

10

10

*The number of customers may actually decrease from year to year due to
building vacancies.
**Information not available.
***Special category includes institutional uses such as schools, churches, etc.
TABLE SS-3
PROJECTED SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS
AND LAND ACREAGE CONSUMPTION 198?-2000
1985

1990

1995

2000

6000
464 Ac.

6830
464 Ac .

7650
464 Ac.

8480
464 Ac.

Multiple-family Residentia1Cl)
Land Consumption

170
80 Ac.

190
101 Ac.

220
101 Ac.

240
101 Ac.

Office/Commercial(!)
Land Consumption

370
37 Ac.

410
38 Ac.

450
38 Ac.

500
38 Ac.

Industrial (1)
Land Consumption

13
139 Ac.

18
139 Ac.

23
139 Ac.

28
139 Ac .

Single-family Residential
Land. Consumption

(l)For purposes of computation of future wastewater influent at the
WWTP, all classes of customers are converted to customer equivalents, as set forth in Table SS-4. An equivalent customer (a
hypothetical term) means the wastewater from a typical household
in the year 1977. Based upon actual water consumption statistics,
this translates to 225 gallons/day/household or 6805 gallons/
household/month.
103

�This page revised Dec. of 1984
TABLE SS-4
WASTEWATER FLOW PROJECTIONS AT
THE DELTA TOWNSHIP WWTP 1985-2000
1985

1990

1995

2000

9,980

11,450

12,920

14,390

Wastewater Flow Rate into WWTP(l)

2.33

2.56

2.89

3.02

Expected Infiltration/Inflow(!)

1.59

1. 70

1.82

1. 93

Total Flow(!)

3.82

4.26

4.71

5 .35

Equivalent Customers (all classes)

(l)All flow rates for wastewater entering the WWTP stated in million
gallons per day (MGD).
Description of Lands Included
in Future Service Areas
Figure SS-II depicts expansion of sanitary sewer service in Delta Township during three time periods. The strategy for service can be generally described as
a filling in of service provided to lands east of I-96. Given the large quantities of vacant land $ituated near present sanitary sewer collection lines, it
was deemed logical to promote utilization of these lands prior to extension of
services to more remote areas. Extension of sewers west of I-96 to serve existing residential subdivisions is recormnended due to documented septic tank
failures and the resulting health hazards. The customer equivalent projections
and land consumption rates were factored to represent provision of services to
subdivisions west of I-96 between 1991 and 1995. No new land consumption is
computed where service is provided to an existing building or use of land.
Much of the projected extension of service will occur in Sections 3, 4, 9, 10,
11, 14, 15, 22, 23 and within the Delta Industrial Tract. In addition, the
fill-in of now vacant parcels in largely built-up areas is encouraged.
Description of Land Excluded
From Future Sanitary Sewer Service
Any discussion of future sanitary sewer service would be incomplete absent
identification of areas not planned for sanitary sewer service within the time
frame of this Plan. Areas not included in future service limits have been
excluded for one or more of the following reasons:
1.

A major physical barrier exists preventing the economical extension of
sewer service, such as a river, wetlands or major highway.

2.

Existing or planned use of land suggests no major transition to urban uses
is desirable. This would include prime croplands, specialized farming,
unusual natural environment, and lands restricted from private development
such as parks and conservation areas.

3.

Areas where other public facilities and services have not evolved to a
point where they would be cost-effective to provide along with sanitary
sewer service.

104

�This page revised Dec. of 1~84
4.

Established planning policies restricting the use of land to densities
not requiring public sanitary sewer service.

Areas which are not destined for future sanitary sewer service are described
as follows:
1.

All lands lying north of the Grand River and west of Interstate 96.

2.

Land lying north of the Grand River and situated between Delta Mills and
Saratoga Farms Subdivisions, but exclusive of Delta Mills and Saratoga .

3.

The entire southwestern quadrant of Delta Township bounded by Mt. Hope
Highway, I-96, the south Township line and the west Township line.

105

�DELTA

TOWNSHIP

Figure SS·II
EXISTING &amp; PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE AREA { 1984)

•

EXISTING SERVICE

mi

Areas not ant ic ipated for
public utility service

EJ

1985·1990

W

1991 ·1995

~ POST 1995

Ill

0
'°
.....

TO BE SERVI CED BY
THE CITY OF LA NSING

iJi!!!if'''

NORTH

...

0

(

1000

ED

2000

12/ 84

4000

�•

the concept should be looked into and considered as a solid waste management tool before becoming locked into other techniques which preclude source separation and recycling.
Source separation and recycling are positive approaches to solid waste
management because many benefits accrue from a properly managed program. The benefits:
1. Material is kept out of the waste stream and out of the
landfill. The less material put into a landfill, the
longer it will last.
2. Wasting of our natural resources is reduced and our limited
domestic supplies of certain raw materials are extended.
3. Income is derived from materials you now pay to dispose of.
This income may not be enough to pay for all your solid
waste management costs but it could help lower these costs.
4. Reprocessing of scrap materials generally causes less pollution than does the processing of virgin materials.

•

•

5. Recycling saves energy. That fact alone makes it worth
considering. Recycling aluminum results in a 95 percent
energy savings over processing from raw materials. Energy
savings from recycling paper range from 20 percent to 70
percent depending on the grade of paper .
6. Other waste processing facilities can be sized smaller, resulting in lower costs.
In spite of the aforementioned benefits of the recycling of -solid waste,
it should be noted that presently most residential, commercial and industrial solid waste is still being dumped tmprocessed in landfills. At
the same time the number of landfill sites is decreasing due to more
stringent state and federal environmental regulations, the rapid rate
at which landfills are being used up and the fact that landfills are
becoming increasingly expensive to construct, renovate and operate.
The recycling of solid waste in the Lansing Metropolitan area is not
widespread at this time due to the pick-up, collection and hauling
costs involved in getting waste materials to a processing site, an inconsistent supply of waste and tmdependable markets for the recycled
materials.
In 1978 the Michigan Legislature adopted Act 641, being the Solid Waste
Management Act. This Act mandated that a solid waste management plan
be prepared for each county. The Act contained requirements that the
plan include an enforcement program and process to assure that the nonhazardous solid waste generated or to be generated in the cotmty for
the next twenty years is collected and recovered, processed, or dispensed of at facilities which comply with State law and rules promulgated by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources governing location, design, and operation of the facilities .
Each county's waste management plans must be filed with the Department
of Natural Resources, cover a twenty year period and be updated every
116

�This page revised Dec. of l~&amp;~
five years. Once the plan has been approved by the DNR, no local
ordinance, law, rule, regulation, policy, practice or plan may override
the location of or development of the approved site location for solid
waste disposal. The plan also is required to contain a covenant restricting the post-disposal use of landfill sites for a fifteen year
period. A solid waste management plan must be approved by at least two
thirds of the municipalities within the planning area. All solid waste
disposal sites (sanitary landfills) must be licensed by the DNR in order
to operate and a financial guarantee in accordance with the statute must
accompany all applications for a license.
The Eaton County Solid Waste Planning Committee was established in
January of 1981 with the expressed purpose of preparing a solid waste
management plan for the County, as per the requirements of Act 641. The
Tri-County Regional Planning Commission acted as the "lead" agency in
assisting the County in preparing the plan as well as coordinating the
Eaton County plan with adjacent county plans. Act 641 requires that 2/3
of the local governments in Eaton County, amounting to 18 of the 27
governmental units of five villages, six cities (including the City of
Lansing) and sixteen Townships, adopt the plan by resolution after
which the plan was transmitted to the DNR for final adoption which took
place in 1984.

117

�...

•

This page revised Dec. of 1984
current availability of utilities as per the 1975 Sewer Agreement, the
proximity of the area to existing low density residential areas, and the
"close-in" location of the area to the Lansing urbanized area .
Neighborhood Two
This area is• characterized by large tracts of vacant land and high
quality, country-estate type homes along Delta River Drive and in the
Saratoga Farms, Island Park Highlands, and White Oaks Subdivisions.
These residential areas are primarily composed of large lots with detached single-family homes.
For the most part this neighborhood is located within the Grand Ledge
School District. The former Delta Mills Elementary School, which is
located in the western portion of the neighborhood, was closed in 1982
and is vacant. The extreme easternmost portion of this neighborhood,
specifically the Saratoga Farms Subdivision and a portion of the Island
Park Highlands Subdivision is located within the Lansing School District.
Public sanitary sewer service was extended to the Saratoga Farms and
Island Park Highlands Subdivisions in 1984. The remainder of the neighborhood is lacking sanitary sewers. It would appear that the central
and western portions of the neighborhood, with the possible exception of
the Delta Mills area, will not be served by sewers until some time in the
future .

The lack of public water service in the area presents problems regarding
fire service. The remoteness of the interior of this neighborhood also
results in difficulties in providing fire and emergency vehicle access.
The existence of a significant amount of land within the one-hundred
year flood plain in the southern portion of this neighborhood could
provide possible recreational opportunities.
The Hawk Meadow Sanctuary, an 81 acre Township park, is located on the
north side of Delta River Drive in the center of the neighborhood. This
facility is planned to be left in a natural state and utilized as a
nature area.
This neighborhood is bordered by Watertown Township to the north. The
Clinton County Comprehensive Plan illustrates a mixture of agricultural
and parks/open space uses along the northern border of Neighborhood Two.
Further north in Watertown Township, between Grand River Avenue and the
Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad tracks, a significant amount of land is
classified for industrial development .
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for the Delta
Mills area due to the planned provision of sanitary sewer service within
the next ten years, the existence of a significant number of single
family homes on platted lots, and the fact that support services such
as a church and several businesses are located in the area. A very low
density residential land use classification is recommended for the
remainder of the neighborhood due to the lack of public utility service
to this area for the foreseeable future, the existence of a very low

126

�This page revised Dec. of 1~84
&gt;.

density residential land use pattern, and the fact that the area is
lacking arterial road access.
Neighborhood Three
The area which is designated as neighborhood three is almost completely
developed with the exception of two vacant parcels, one of which is on
the westernmost portion of the neighborhood and the other being on the
southernmost portion. A low density residential development land use
pattern has been firmly established in this area. Some of Delta Township's highest quality single family subdivisions are found in this
neighborhood.
Neighborhood Three is bordered by Grand Woods Park to the north. This
139 acre facility borders the Grand River and offers hiking trails, playground equipment, softball fields, a canoe launch and a shelter building.
I~ 1984 Delta Township entered into an agreement with the City of
Lansing, owner of the park, to lease and maintain the facility for a
thirty year period. Sharp Park, a 55 acre recreational complex owned
and operated by Delta Township is located in the southwestern portion of
this neighborhood and features an amphitheater, physical fitness trails,
a fishing pond, tennis courts and softball fields.
A proposed fire station site, consisting of approximately two acres, is
located immediately south of the St. David's Church property along
Elmwood Road. This facility should provide much improved fire fighting service to the eastern portion of the Township.
One of the major concerns in this neighborhood is the through traffic
which traverses residential areas in this neighborhood enroute t o the
Delta Township central business district. The· proposed east-west
collector road is intended to address this transportation related
problem.
The entire neighborhood is located within the Waverly School District
with the school district boundary line serving as the western border of
this neighborhood. The Elmwood Elementary School serves this neighborhood.
A low density residential classification is recommended for this neighborhood since a low density single-family residential pattern has been
established and supportive services and facilities such as recreational
areas and retail businesses are located in close proximity. The existing street system in the area is also adequate tosupport low density
residential development.

127

�This page revised Dec. of 1984
This neighborhood consists of two subdivisions, being Castle Hills
Subdivision on the east which consists of approximately two hundred
platted lots and the Huntington Acres Subdivision on the west side of
the neighborhood which has approximately two hundred and thirty platted
lots. · The Castle Hills Subdivision was platted in 1929 with the majority of the homes being constructed in the area in the late 1930's and
1940's. The majority of the lots in the Huntington Acres Subdivision
are significantly larger than those to the east in the Castle Hills
Subdivision.
Publi:c sanitary sewer and water service is generally available in the
area with the exception that there is no water line along Waverly
Road. The entire neighborhood lies within the Banks-Briggs Intercounty
Drainage District. The Preliminary Study and Report of the BanksBriggs Intercounty Drain, which was prepared in 1977, documented the
need for storm drainage improvements in this area.
A low density residential classification is recommended for neighborhood eleven due to the fact that a low density single family residential
land use pattern has been established in the area. Residential land
uses in this area can be adequately served by adjacent arterial streets,
existing public sewer and water service and the retail businesses which
are located in close proximity to the neighborhood.
Neighborhood Twelve
Neighborhood Twelve is expected to receive a significant amount of
residential development in the 1980's due to the availability of vacant
land and the general adequa~y of utilities in this area. Three developments, being the Fairfield Subdivision, Park Meadows Subdivision and
Townhouse complex and the Westwind Apartments, were constructed in the
area in the 1978-1981 period.
The neighborhood is served by the Waverly High School and Junior High
complex which is located immediately to the west. Close attention
should be given to any proposed developments on the east side of Snow
Road to insure that such developments will not impose any significant
negative impacts such as excessive traffic, high noise levels, etc.,
upon the adjacent school complex. In spite of the number of schools
which are located in close proximity to this neighborhood, sidewalks
are practically nonexistent in the area. At a minimum, sidewalks
should be provided adjacent to St. Joe Highway and Snow Road in order
to serve the Colt and Winans Elementary Schools, Waverly West Junior
High and Waverly High School .

•
134

�Several major transportation improvements are proposed for this neighborhood. The first improvement involves the reconstruction of Snow
Road between Michigan Avenue and St. Joe Highway. The second needed
improvement is the hard surfacing of Stoll Road which is one of the last
graveled roads which still exists in the urbanized portion of Delta
Township.
Public sewer and water service in this area is generally adequate to
serve most forms of residential development. A Delta Township water
storage tank is located on the western periphery of the neighborhood.
Storm drainage in the area presents a problem in that property on
either side of Stoll Road is not within a designated county storm drainage dis~rict. The Michigan Avenue Drain, and its branches which serve
the neighborhood, no longer has adequate additional capacity to serve
urban types of development in this area. Thus, absent improvements to
these drains, some form of on-site storm water detention will be
necessary.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this
neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density residential land use pattern is firmly established
in the area.

2.

Low density residential areas generally generate more school-age
children than higher density residential areas. Given the close
proximity of the Waverly School complex it is logical to encourage low density residential development in such a manner that
children can walk to school.

3.

Facilities and services which support residential areas are a short
distance away. These facilities and services include retail businesses, playground areas and arterial roadways.

Neighborhood Thirteen
The predominant features in this neighborhood are the Waverly Schools
complex on the east, the Homestead Acres Subdivision in the center,
and approximately 150 acres of vacant land on the western portion of
the neighborhood. There are approximately 125 acres of land in this
area which is in agricultural production.
Public water service is generally available throughout the neighborhood.
A water well is located in the vicinity of the Mall Drive South and
Michigan Avenue intersection. Public sanitary sewer service is available to the area except for the fact that there are no sanitary sewer
lines adjacent to St . Joe Highway. All of this neighborhood is located
within the Michigan Avenue storm drainage district except for the westernmost 80 acres which is located within the Tower Drainage District.
A 48 inch storm drain is located within the Kenway Drive right-of-way
and flows northward to the Grand River . On-site detention of storm
water runoff will be required in this area to insure that the drains
in the area are not overloaded.

135

..

�This page revised Dec. of 1984
2.

•

The area is very desirable for ·low density residential land use
due to the existence of the Delta Center Elementary School, the
close proximity of retail businesses along Saginaw Highway and
at the Creyts Road/St. Joe Highway intersection, and the fact
that the Carrier Creek traverses the center of the neighborhood
and provides various recreational opportunities.

Neighborhood Sixteen
The majority of the land in this neighborhood is presently vacant with
the exception of the Sherwood Forest Apartments and the Century Park
Mobile Home Park on the northern portion of the neighborhood and several
single-family residences along Canal Road. The entire ~ei~hborhood is
located within the Grand Ledge School District.
Public water service is limited to the northern portion of the neighborhood due to the fact that a water line exists
only 1/2 mile south
of M-43. Sanitary sewer service is generally available to the majority
of this area. The majority of the neighborhood is located within the
Lazell Drainage District. The extreme southeast portion of the neighborhood is located within the Moon and Hamilton Drainage District.
The Delta Center Elementary School is located immediately to the east
of this neighborhood but unfortunately sidewalks do not exist along
Canal Road. The fact that the area abuts I-96 to the west could necessitate some type of screening in order to buffer prospective residential
uses from the freeway's possible negative impacts.

•

The proposed extension of Michigan Avenue to Canal Road should provide
improved access to this area. It is anticipated that increasing traffic
volumes in the vicinity of the Canal Road/St. Joe Highway intersection
will necessitate improvements such as traffic signalization and additional lanes in this area.
The following justifications are given for the medium density residential land use pattern which is recommended for this area:
1.

The area will be provided transportation facilities and services
in the future, such as improvements to Canal Road and the extension
of Michigan Avenue which can adequately support this type of development.

2.

A sufficient number of large parcels exist in this area to facilitate land assemblage for multiple family developments.

3.

Medium density residential land uses are already found in this neighborhood.

4.

The area is located in close proximity to the I-96/M-43 Interchange.

Neighborhood Seventeen

-

Neighborhood seventeen consists primarily of vacant land with the exception of the Gettysburg Farms Subdivisions and several single-family residences located along St. Joe Highway and Canal Road. Two institutional

13R

�uses, being the Delta Center Cemetery and the Trinity United Methodist
Church, border the northern boundary of this neighborhood.
Public water service is presently not available to this neighborhood.
The Gettysburg Farms Subdivisions are served by private water wells.
Further urban-type development in this neighborhood should be prohibited absent public water service which is necessary to comply with
minimum fire flow requirements. Sanitary sewer service is generally
available to this area via sewer lines within the Canal Road and St.
Joe Highway rights-of-way as well as the Carrier Creek Interceptor.
The maj~rity of this neighborhood is located within the Michigan Avenue
Storm Drainage District. The Moon and Hamilton Drain (Carrier Creek)
traverses the center of this neighborhood in a north-south direction.
The easternmost forty acres of neighborhood seventeen is located within
the Tower Drainage District.
·
The Carrier Creek's 100-year flood plain covers approximately fifty
acres in the center of this neighborhood. A natural water body which
is approximately ten acres in size lies immediately south of the
Gettysburg Farms West Subdivision.
As previously mentioned, the intersection of Canal Road and St. Joe
Highway is presently handling a significant amount of traffic, especially at peak hours. What with projected increases in traffic
volumes at this intersection it will be imperative that improvements be made at this intersection which could include the installation of a traffic signal and/or the installation of additional
turning lanes.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for this neighborhood for the following reasons:
1.

A low density single family residential land use pattern has already
been firmly established in the area.

2.

The roadways in this area would probably not sa~ely accommodate the
amount of traffic generated by higher density residential developments.

Neighborhood Eighteen
The majority of the land in neighborhood eighteen is vacant· with the exception of the Echo Valley Estates Subdivision and several single-family
residences along Mt. Hope Highway. Although the Echo Valley Estates
Subdivision was platted in 1965, it has yet to be completely developed
due to the fact that many of the lots have not passed septic tank percolation tests. The entire neighborhood is located within the Grand
Ledge School District.
The eastern portion of Neighborhood Eighteen is served by the Carrier
Creek sanitary sewer interceptor . The proposed Hamilton Sanitary Sewer
Service District would serve the western portions of this neighborhood.
No portion of this neighborhood has public water service.
This neighborhood is not within an established county storm drainage
district at this time. Measures are presently being taken to have the

139

�majority of this neighborhood included in the proposed Delta Industrial Drainage District. A twenty acre storm water detention pond
is envisioned in the center of Section 22 for the purpose of storing storm water runoff generated within the industrial tract so
that flooding does not occur downstream during peak water runoff
periods.
Transportation improvements planned for this area include the reconstruction of Mt. Hope Highway, between Canal Road and Creyts Road,
to Class A, All Weather status. This project will provide improved
access to the Delta Township Industrial Tract to the south.
A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for Neighborhood Eighteen for the following reasons:
1.

A low density residential single-family land use pattern has already been established in this area due to the presence of the
Echo Valley Estates Subdivision.

2.

The provision of a low density residential area adjacent to the industrial tract will insure a variety of housing types in the area.

The fact that this neighborhood is bordered by I-496 to the north and
the industrial tract to the south will most likely necessitate the installation of screening devices in order to mitigate the possible negative impacts of the aforementioned facilities on future residential
developments. The recommendations for residential development for this
area presupposes that adequate public utilities, roadways, and storm
drainage facilities exist to serve any propos~d development.
Neighborhood Nineteen
The majority of the land in neighborhood nineteen is vacant with the
exception of the Homeland and Meadow View Subdivisions and the singlefamily detached residences along Mt. Hope Highway and Creyts Road. The
Homeland Subdivision, which borders both sides of Marcy Road, was platted in 1929 and consists of 81 platted lots. The Meadow View Subdivision,
which borders both sides of Guenther Road, was also platted in 1929 and
consists of 56 platted lots.
Public water service is available throughout the Meadow View Subdivision
as well as the westernmost portion of the neighborhood. The interior
of the neighborhood, including the Homeland Subdivision, lacks water
service due to the fact that a water main is not located within the Mt.
Hope Highway right-of-way.
The entire area is presently lacking sanitary sewer service. The easternmost portion of the neighborhood is located within the Underhill extension drainage district while the westernmost portion of the neighborhood is located within the Holly Drainage District.
The majority of neighborhood nineteen is located within the Waverly
School District. The westernmost sixty acres of the neighborhood is
located within the Grand Ledge School District.
Delta Township owns approximately

l½

acres of land on the north side

140

�This page revised Dec. of l9?4
of Mt. Hope Highway, west of the GM Parts Warehouse, within Section 24
which is being reserved for a future fire station. Although not located
within Neighborhood Nineteen, the proposed fire station should provide
improved fire service to the general area.
Given the fact that this neighborhood is positioned between industrial
areas to the east and south and an interstate freeway to the north,
there will probably be a need to provide screening treatments, such as
landscaped berms and buffer strips, to insure an orderly transition in
land uses. A low density residential land use pattern is recommended
for the eastern portion of Neighbo~hood Nineteen for the following
reasonsf
1.

A low density single family residential land use pattern exists in
the area due to the existence of the Homeland and Meadowview
Subdivisions.

2.

The proposed open space corridor along the south side of Mt. Hope
Highway will provide for a proper transition between residential
uses on the north side of Mt. Hope Highway and industrial uses on
the south side of Mt. Hope Highway.

3.

The provision of a low density residential areas adjacent to the
industrial tract will insure a variety of housing types in the
area.

A medium density residential land use pattern is recommended for the
Western portion of Neighborhood Nineteen for the following reasons:
1.

This area is located adjacent to the Creyts Road/I-496 Interchange
which affords easy access to the Greater Lansing Area.

2.

The land ownership pattern in this area is such that land could
be assembled for multiple family developments.

3.

Medium density residential development in this area should provide
ample housing opportunities for employees in the adjacent industrial
tract.

Neighborhood Twenty
The Millett community is the most prominent feature in Neighborhood
Twenty. The neighborhood is composed of nine subdivisions and several
commercial establishments along Lansing Road.
Public sanitary sewers were installed in the majority of the Millett
Area in 1984. Public water service is not available in the neighborhood.
The fact that U.S. 27 and the Grand Truck Western Railroad border Neighborhood Twenty on the north presents obstacles to providing fire service to the area. A volunteer fire station is located on Lansing Road
but due to the fact that this facility is unmanned, it can provide only
limited service.

141

./"""""\

�-

by the Myers and Henderson Drainage District while the central portion
is served by the Decke Drainage District and the southwest area is served by the Munton Drainage District.
This neighborhood is bordered by Onieda Township to the west. The Eaton
County Development Plan illustrates parks and open space uses for the
majority of land in Section 24 of Onieda Township while a small area is
classified as rural non-agricultural uses.
The proposed construction of I-69 from its present terminus to Charlotte
will impact this area in terms of land acquisition, traffic volumes, and
transitions in land use. A freeway interchange is planned on Nixon Road
south of Mt. Hope Highway. During the construction of I-69, it is planned to extend Broadbent Road from its existing terminus approximately
three-quarters of a mile to the south to connect with Mt. Hope Highway.
The construction of the Broadbent Road extension should provide improved access in this area via the provision of a new north-south corridor between Willow Highway and Davis Highway.
Very often commercial land uses are advocated for those areas adjacent
to a freeway interchange. It is recommended that commercial land uses
not be established adjacent to the I-69/Nixon Road interchange for the
following reasons:

-

1.

It is assumed that the construction of the interchange will precede
the availability of public utilities in the area.

2.

At this time it does not appear that there is a large enough population within this area to support retail businesses in this area.

3.

The establishment of commercial uses ;in this area could impose
negative impacts -such as excessive traffic volumes and incompatibilities in land use upon adjacent resida~tial uses.

A low density residential land use pattern is recommended for Neighborhood Twenty Seven for. the following reasons:
1.

A low density single family residential land use pattern has already been established in the area due to the existence of the
Countryside Estates and Evergreen Heights Subdivisions •
.• ,--_ l

2.

There are several areas in this neighborhood where soil conditions would not be conducive to the construction of commercial
or multiple family buildings.

3.

This neighborhood is located several miles from existing and proposed fire service facilities. Therefore, land uses which require
significant fire flows should be discouraged in this area.

Neighborhood Twenty Eight

-

The majority of land in this neighborhood is vacant with the exception
of several single-family residences located along section line roads.
It is estimated that approximately 2400 acres of land within this
neighborhood are currently in agricultural production. All of the

148

�This page was revised April of f9e3
Dec. of 1984
Most of the soils in this area are very conducive to agricultural uses.
These soils also present severe limitations for urban type development
due to poor septic tank percolation, poor compaction and load bearing
capacity and the fact that they are susceptible to frost action.
The Delta Township Parks, Open Space and Recreation Plan recommends
that a community park site be obtained somewhere in this neighborhood
in order to serve the long range recreation needs of residents in the
southwest portion of Delta Township. Delta Township owns twenty acres
of land on the north side of Millett Highway adjacent to 1-96 which i~
planned to be used as a future cemetery site.
The proposed construction of 1-69 from Lansing to Charlotte will result
in approximately 35 acres of land being designated as interstate right
of way in the extreme southeast portion of the neighborhood. Davis
Highway will go over 1-69 via a bridge structure. The proposed connection of 1-69 to 1-96 does not include the installation of on or off
ramps within Delta Township.
This neighborhood is bordered by Onieda Township to the west and Windsor
Township to the south. The Eaton County Development Plan depicts parks
and open space uses within Sections 25 and 36 of Onieda Township. The
Windsor Township Comprehensive Development Plan depicts agricultural
land uses for those areas within Sections 4, 5 and 6 which abut Neighborhood Twenty Eight.
An agricultural land use classificatiop, is recommended for all of Sec-

tions 29, 30, 31 and 32 for the following .r easons:
1.

The soils in this area are most conducive to agricultural activities.

2.

An agricultural land use pattern ·nas ··been firmly established in

this area.

3.

Public utility service is not plaJln~~ for this area in the near
future.

A very low density residential classification is recommended for the
remainder of Neighborhood Twenty Eight for the following reasons:
1.

A very low density single-family residential land use pattern has
been established in this area.

2.

The relatively flat topography withi,n the eastern portion of Neighborhood Twenty Eight presents prob~ems in adequately handling storm
water runoff generated by urban type .development.

3.

Public utility service is not planned for this area in the near
future.

4.

The section line, gravel surfaced roadways in this area could not
safely accommodate the higher volumes of traffic which are associated with higher densities of residential developments.

149

R

�TABLE LU-2

•

PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
(continued)
PROJECT

NAME

LENGTH
(MILES)

.5

East-West
Collector St.
(Willow St.
extension)

•

PRIMARY

PURPOSE(S)

Willow Hwy. to
Elmwood Rd.

New construction

1.0

Elmwood Rd.
to Creyts Rd.

New construction

1.0

Creyts Rd. to
Canal Rd.

New construction
Bridge structure

Sno½· 'R.d.
1.n·ie'r's ec tion

Realignment of
intersection, ROW
acquisition, radius
improvements

Improve turning movements

New construction,
bridge structure

Provide a needed north-south
corridor with
a river crossing in the
western portion of the
Township.

New construction

Provide improved access
within Industrial Tract

Mt. Hope
Hwy •

Provide alternative east-west
access other
than W. Saginaw Hwy.,
eliminate
through traffic from residential neighborhoods

bf'

Nixon Rd.
extension

Willow Hwy.
t~ J;~ ton Hwy.

1.0

r

Davis Hwy.
extension

-~· t

. 25
,l._•

,'• .t

•

PROPOSED
Il1PROVEMENTS

LOCATION

,....,,....

-

!

i _.

Can.ii Rd .
~east to existing
terminus
;.1r1

. ,1 .

164

�"l&gt;-

~

),

This page revised Dec. of 1984 ·

TABLE LU-2
PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
(continued)
PROJECT
NAME
Creyts Rd.

LENGTH
(MILES)
1.0

U.S. 27 to Millett Hwy.

Acceleration/Deceleration lanes, intersection improvements,
drainage outlet.

1.0

Millett Hwy. to Mt.
Hope Hwy.

ROW acquisition,
drainage outlet,
acceleration/deceleration lanes, additional lanes at
selected points .

St. Joe Hwy. to
Michigan Ave.

ROW acquisition, additional lanes at
selected points,
improve vertical alignment.

.5

Michigan Ave. to
Saginaw Hwy.

ROW acquisition, additional lanes at
selected points, drainage outlet.

2.0

St. Joe Hwy. to
Willow Hwy.

New Construction

•5

Royston Rd.
extension

PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS

LOCATION

165

PRIMARY
PURPOSE(S)
Improve traffic circulation and traffic
carrying capacity.

Provide improved
north-south traffic
movements in the
western portion of
the Township.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007647">
                <text>Delta-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan-Revisions_1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007648">
                <text>Delta Township Planning Commission, Eaton County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007649">
                <text>1984-12-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007650">
                <text>1984 Revisions</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007651">
                <text>The 1984 Revisions were prepared by the Delta Township Planning Commission as part of the Delta Township Comprehensive Plan and were adopted on December 10, 1984.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007652">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007653">
                <text>Delta Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007654">
                <text>Eaton County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007655">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007657">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007658">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007659">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007660">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038283">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="40144" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="43930">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/f785c72e3724d04688a70fbed4aba77c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a52cfbd16c3671c9bb124cfc96265596</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="764020">
                    <text>�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="36">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="761921">
                  <text>Incunabula</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765550">
                  <text>The term incunabula refers to books printed between 1450 and 1500, approximately the first fifty years following the invention, by Johann Gutenberg of Mainz, of printing from moveable type. Our collection includes over 200 volumes and numerous unbound leaves from books printed during this period.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765551">
                  <text>1450/1500</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765552">
                  <text>Incunabula Collection (DC-03)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765553">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United &lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765554">
                  <text>Incunabula</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765747">
                  <text>Printing 1450-1500</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765555">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765556">
                  <text>DC-03</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765557">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765558">
                  <text>text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765559">
                  <text>eng&#13;
it&#13;
la&#13;
nl &#13;
de</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764007">
                <text>Specula omnis status vitae humanae [folium 127]</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764008">
                <text>DC-03_127Carthussiensis1495</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764009">
                <text>Denis, the Carthusian, 1402-1471</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764010">
                <text>One leaf from Specula omnis status vitae humanae by Dionysius Carthusiensis and edited by Petrus Danhauser. Printed in Nuremberg by Peter Wagner on January 28, 1495. [GW 8419; ISTC id00248000]</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764011">
                <text>Nuremburg: Peter Wagner</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764012">
                <text>Incunabula</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="764013">
                <text>Printing 1450-1500</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764014">
                <text>la</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764015">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764017">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764018">
                <text>1495</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="764019">
                <text>Seidman Rare Books Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="792788">
                <text>Danhauser, Petrus (editor)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="799322">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="22651" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="25124">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/36e1106395c5d5c93de33d39275282ba.pdf</src>
        <authentication>84bb7dc1bf45614d6e1ea8e116f0803d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="408016">
                    <text>1

Grand Valley State University Special Collections
Kent County Oral History collections, RHC-23
Mr. Donald G. Denison.
Interviewed on May 15, 1975
Edited and indexed by Don Bryant, 2010 – bryant@wellswooster.com
Tape # 50 (51:21)
Biographical Information

Donald G. Denison was born 22 April 1891 in Grand Rapids and died 21 Aug 1983. He was the
son of Arthur C. Denison and Susan L. Goodrich. He married Adeline Smith in 1917.
Arthur Carter Denison, son of Julius Coe Denison and Cornelia Carter was born 11 November
1861 in Paris Township, Kent County. He died 24 May 1942 in Cleveland, Ohio and was buried
in the Oak Hill Cemetery in Grand Rapids. Susan L. Goodrich, daughter of Hiram and Cornelia
Goodrich, was born on 17 June 1864 in Grand Rapids and died on 5 May 1896 at the age of 31
and was buried in Oak Hill Cemetery. Arthur and Susan were married 7 September 1886 in
Grand Rapids.
On 24 May 1898 Arthur married as his second wife, Julia B. Barlow, the daughter of Heman G.
and J. Ruth (Hall) Barlow. Julia was born in November 1875 in Grand Rapids. She passed away
on 6 July 1956 in Grand Rapids and was buried in Oak Hill Cemetery.
___________

Interviewer: This is the interview being conducted at the residence of Mr. Donald Denison, 31
South Prospect, on May fifteenth, nineteen seventy-five.
I thought we’d start the interview by talking about the death of Mr. Denison’s grandfather which
occurred on June twenty-fifth, eighteen seventy-seven. I’ll let you take it on from there, Mr.
Denison.
Donald: Alright, I’ll begin on how he got there. He came out here, I think in the early fifties,
perhaps, and he bought two farms…one to the north of Grand Rapids and one to the south of
Grand Rapids. And he farmed both of these places for several years. Somewhere along the way
he…. he came into knowledge of this house at the corner of Ransom and Lyon.
Interviewer: At the northwest corner, right?
Donald: Yes.
Interviewer: Which had been left high and dry in the air, by the cutting down of Ransom Street
and Lyon Street, and I suppose he bought it for a comparative bargain because of that reason.
Interviewer: Do you know who built the house?

�2

Donald: No, but, somewhere around here is a clipping that tells all about it, I can perhaps find it
before we get through.
Interviewer: Yes, and your…I think you mentioned that your father had helped build a retaining
wall there.
Donald: Grandfather bought the place at a bargain I assume and built the retaining wall of the
stone from the Grand River.
Interviewer: OK.
Donald: And my father, remembered vaguely, thinking he was helping his father with the
stonework. He was probably a small boy of four or five…
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: or so.
Interviewer: Your father was born in eighteen sixty-one.
Donald: Born in sixty-one, so this would’ve been in, in…
Interviewer: Well, in the middle…
Donald: Either that or in the late sixties sometime, yes.
Interviewer: Well, I remember the house quite well because it was, well, it was sort of quaint,
noted house...
Donald: Yes.
Interviewer: …and was built of Grand River Limestone, I believe. How long did your family live
on in that house?
Donald: They lived here only until he died, wait a minute, longer than that. He died in seventyseven.
Interviewer: Right.
Donald: And, they lived there at least, they possessed the house until I would think the early
eighties.
Interviewer: Ok.
Donald: I know, there’s some diaries of my father’s who can make some kind a sale? And at that
time, I think he was in Ann Arbor, as a law student.

�3

Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: So they had it for some years.
Interviewer: Let me shut it off for a second…About or what year did your father-grandfather
come to Grand Rapids?
Donald: In the early fifties
Interviewer: In the early fifties? Where was he born?
Donald: He was born at, are we on the air now?’
Interviewer: Yes, he was born in....
Donald: Born in Durham, New York.
Interviewer: Durham, New York.
Donald: Which was in the Catskills.
Interviewer: I see.
Donald: And that family, his father’s name was John. That family came from Durham, New
York to….
Interviewer: To Durham?
Donald: To Eastern New York.
Interviewer: Oh, I see.
Donald: And settled…
Interviewer: Well…
Donald: I, trying to think…
Interviewer: Well, was it an old colonial family?
Donald: They came from…Yes; they came a generation or two before that from Connecticut.
The first Denison was discovered in Connecticut in sixteen forty.
Interviewer: Did he arrive there about that time?
Donald: He was discovered there but….
Interviewer: I see.

�4

Donald: How he got there or when, nobody knows.
Interviewer: Your grandfather’s name was Julius, right?
Donald: My grandfather’s name was Julius.
Interviewer: He didn’t live for a great many years; I think he died when he was about fifty-four.
Maybe you can describe the account of his death?
Donald: Yes, there was a dispute to which he ended up-ended up before the alderman or the
board of supervisors, whoever was in control of the city and county of that time, as to allowing
or not allowing cattle to graze in the streets, besides the streets. Now whether that grandfather’s
interest was pro or con, I don’t know.
Interviewer: I think it was pro; at least it seemed that he wanted cows to be allowed in there.
Donald: Should or should not cows be allowed?
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: And he appeared before the council, to speak on the subject. But whether he was pro or
con, I never knew.
Interviewer: Well, I think the clipping is that I saw yesterday indicates that he was pro.
Donald: Alright, at any rate, in the middle of his little speech or talk that he was making, I think
he was standing before the council, he fell to the ground and promptly died. And whether he’d
had any previous troubles or, with heart or otherwise I don’t know but I don’t think so, I never
heard of any.
Interviewer: Was he active in farming?
Donald: Oh, yes.
Interviewer: But he lived downtown?
Donald: By this time, he lived in this house on the corner, what we’re talking about, and farmed
the two farms by horse and buggy.
Interviewer: Yes, I see but he actually lived right in the house in the heart of the city.
Donald: Operated these two farms.
Interviewer: One on the north end of town.
Donald: One was across…I have a hard trouble remembering the names.

�5

Interviewer: Well, some of the street names have changed, but I think it was almost up to the
Kent Country Club, right around there.
Donald: Right across Knapp Street from the present Kent Country Club was one farm. The other
was out Paris, which is now grown up and city.
Interviewer: Yes. And who was your grandmother?
Donald: Grandmother was Cornelia Carter.
Interviewer: Where did she come from?
Donald: Who also came from rural western New York.
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: They were married before they came out here.
Interviewer: Did she outlive your grandfather for some years?
Donald: Yes, indeed, she lived until nineteen seventeen.
Interviewer: I have a note here, right. You must have pretty vivid memories of her?
Donald: Of course, I was married by that time, and she lived long enough to know Adeline, my
wife. We were married in nineteen seventeen.
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: She was eighty-seven, I think.
Interviewer: So, she lived a long time after her husband died. I believe your family moved at
some point to a house also on Lyon Street, it was three twenty-nine; I drove by the house
yesterday. It is still there, it has been covered unfortunately with aluminum siding, but you must
remember that house. Were you born in that house?
Donald: I was born in that house, and lived there until I went to college.
Interviewer: Where did you go to college?
Donald: University of Michigan.
Interviewer: Right.
Donald: I graduated in nineteen thirteen.

�6

Interviewer: Your father [Arthur C.] was of course, a noted jurist and also went to University of
Michigan, I believe and took his law degree there. And then came back to practice in Grand
Rapids. Who were some of his earliest law partners and associates?
Donald: He was a junior partner, protégée’ of Edward Taggert. Edward Taggert was the uncle
of Johnson Taggert who was for many years the city attorney here.
Interviewer: Who was Moses Taggert?
Donald: Moses Taggert was Edward Taggert’s brother.
Interviewer: I see...
Donald: And …
Interviewer: He practiced law though with other men and I believe two great uncles of mine,
Hugh and Charles Wilson.
Donald: Alright, the firm original was just plain Taggert with father as a helper then, when he
came in it was Taggert and Denison, then your great uncle Charles joined them and for many
years and in my youth, it was Taggert, Denison and Wilson.
Interviewer: Yes, where did they have their offices?
Donald: They had their offices in the Michigan Trust building, where I could get a haircut for a
quarter, and tell the haircut operator that my father would pay it when he came along the next
day.
Interviewer: I see. I took the liberty of bringing some notes with me, but your father received an
appointment as federal judge directly from President Taft, is that correct?
Donald: Yes, he was appointed as successor to Judge Wanty, in nineteen nine, perhaps and
before very long, a matter of only few short years he was appointed to the Cincinnati Court,
where he continued until his seventieth birthday. Which was…
Interviewer: Well, it was in nineteen thirty-one, yes.
Donald: That sounds right.
Interviewer: He was born on the tenth of November. And there was an interesting….
Donald: Now…
Interviewer: Excuse me, go ahead.
Donald: At that time he resigned from the court, which is quite different for retiring. A retiring
judge as I understand it, is serving to call and still a member of the judiciary.

�7

Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: A resignee is through and free to go and practice law.
Interviewer: Why did he resign?
Donald: I presume to make some money. He would have never grown rich in the judicial
business and he had a notion of resigning and coming back to Grand Rapids acting in an
advisory capacity of someone here. He discussed the subject with Mr. Keeney.
Interviewer: But that didn’t materialize.
Donald: About that time Mr. Baker of Cleveland, the ex-Secretary of War….
Interviewer: Milton D. Baker.
Donald: Milton D. Baker suggested to father that perhaps it would be a good idea for him to
come down and join him as counsel, which appealed to him. And he did so; practiced law there
for some ten years, which were very successful and happy years for him in association with
Baker both socially and in the business.
Interviewer: Did you know Mr. Baker yourself?
Donald: I got to know him quite well and became a great admirer of him.
Interviewer: He was quite an interesting personality, I believe, but I don’t know much about him.
Donald: Well, I remember one thing about him. I was in his library in his house in Cleveland,
and the library was lined to the ceiling with books and in the frieze around the top was a set of
books in red leather and it made a complete frieze around the library. I asked him, “What are
they?” And he said one thing you got for being Secretary of War; that was when you left they
backed up a truck to your house and gave you the complete record of all the official documents
of the Civil War. That was a tradition and there they were. That reminded me to ask him a
question or two that puzzled me about Civil War times and he said well, let’s see. And he got a
ladder, brought it out, climbed up on the ladder and looked at the books and got one down and
studied it and answered my question.
Interviewer: So you learned something?
Donald: I learned something.
Interviewer: And Mr. Baker died before your father did, as I recall, but your father stayed on in
the firm.
Donald: Father was here visiting when he got a telephone call, that Mr. Baker had died. It was a
blow, of course.

�8

Interviewer: About when did your family move into this house?
Donald: nineteen sixteen.
Interviewer: Yes. Who built this house?
Donald: Mr. Sligh
Interviewer: Mr. Charles Sligh?
Donald: Mr. Charles Sligh built the house in eighteen ninety-one.
Interviewer: I see. Did he live here until the time of the sale?
Donald: He owned it until that time.
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: The house was rented for a short time. I am trying to think of the name of the family.
The girl in the family married Paul Hollister.
Interviewer: Yes, I can’t tell you.
Donald: They rented this house for a very short time.
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: Otherwise it never had occupants except Slighs and Denisons.
Interviewer: Now when your father went to Cleveland in nineteen thirty or thirty-one or thirtytwo, did you stay on in this house?
Donald: We moved into this house.
Interviewer: I see.
Donald: It had stood vacant for a time; then we moved into it.
Interviewer: And you are still here. Let’s see, let’s go back a minute, you were born in the house
over on Lyon Street, three twenty-nine?
Donald: And that’s right
Interviewer: Do you remember much about that neighborhood?
Donald: Well, I grew up there, so I remember a lot of course. The Idemas were our close
neighbors; they directly across the street.
Interviewer: Yes. And who were some of the other neighbors?

�9

Donald: The Henry Idemas, also Fred Idemas. Fred Idema was Henry Idema’s brother and they
lived right next to each other across the street. The Treadways lived next door to the Idemas and
the Whitmans built a house right next to us and sold it quite shortly to Frank Dykema.
Interviewer: Was he the druggist?
Donald: Dykemas, no (Pat was?)
Interviewer: Did the Barlows live nearby?
Donald: Barlows lived next door. They were my step-grandparents. We boys, there were three
of us and we really had two homes. It was humorously said that we would go into the two
kitchens to see which house was serving up the dinner that we liked we would settle down in that
house.
Interviewer: How old were you when your mother died?
Donald: Five years old. I remember her, vaguely remember a few fleeting pictures of her.
Interviewer: Your father remarried and married Julie Barlow.
Donald: And they were our next door neighbors, Julia Barlow, that’s right.
Interviewer: So you have pretty vivid memories of the Barlow family. Who are the Barlows; I
mean who were Mr. and Mrs. Barlow?
Donald: Heman Barlow was in the wholesale grocery business with Mr. Judson in what later
turned out to be the Judson Grocery Company. The Barlows were originally New England
family that turned into U.E. Loyalists and went to Canada and then re-immigrated here in 1860, I
think. How they got to Grand Rapids from Canada I do not know, but they came here when
Grandfather Barlow was ten years old
Interviewer: He was born in eighteen fifty, at one point he was a bookbinder, I understand.
Donald: It was his brother.
Interviewer: His brother, I see.
Donald: Yes, although it was known as Barlow Brothers. Series of bound volumes are still
around here, falling apart most of them.
Interviewer: Where did you go to school?
Donald: I went to Fountain Street School to begin with, which was where Central High School
is now.

�10

Interviewer: I see. That’s why they call Fountain School, Fountain School, I suppose. They built
Fountain School around the corner on College.
Interviewer: Yes, it is still.
Donald: They continue to call it Fountain Street School. Then by the time we got to sixth grade
we went to Central Grammar School, which comprised of seventh and eighth grades, yes.
Interviewer: Where was that located?
Donald: That was on the same grounds as the High School. The High School fronted on
Ransom. And the Central Grammar School which had been the earlier High School, I think, it
fronted on either Lyon or it fronted on Bostwick. So there were two buildings on that little
campus, as it were; the High School and the Central Grammar School. Earlier there had been the
old Stone school on that same location that my father and mother had both gone to.
Interviewer: And that was on Bostwick or on Ransom?
Donald: I think it occupied the grounds between them.
Interviewer: I see. Did you go to Central High School after Central Grammar School?
Donald: Then I went to Grand Rapids High School.
Interviewer: Where was that?
Donald: That was right there, that was the building that was just torn down in the last year.
Interviewer: Oh, yes.
Donald: It was not called Central because it was the only high school except the one on the west
side and that only went thru the eleventh grade. And in nineteen eleven the present Central High
School was built and assumed that name of Central High School. It was a continuation of the old
Grand Rapids High School, same faculty, same records.
Interviewer: You graduated from old Grand Rapids High School?
Donald: There was no such thing as Central High School then.
Interviewer: What year did you graduate?
Donald: Nineteen eight
Interviewer: Nineteen eight and you went directly there to Michigan.
Donald: No, I worked for a year in the furniture factory, in the Macey Furniture Factory, Macey
Furniture Company, made sectional bookcases.

�11

Interviewer: I remember that because I think my grandfather was the director of it or something.
Donald: Might well have been. It was headed by Otto Warneke.
Interviewer: Hmmm.
Donald: And it was quite a prosperous concern.
Interviewer: Where was it located?
Donald: On South Division, the building is still there, pretty well out South Division.
Interviewer: I wonder who is in the building now.
Donald: I think it is a storage building for somebody.
Interviewer: Steelcase or one…
Donald: Not Steelcase, who is…?
Interviewer: Your knowledge of South Division is as bad as mine.
Donald: I used to get up and ride the streetcar down there and get there at seven o’clock. I
remember that. And we worked ten hours a day plus an extra ten minutes. The extra ten minutes
were a credit that applied on Saturday so we could get away at noon on Saturday.
Interviewer: I see.
Donald: And still have our sixty hours for the week. Pay was a dollar an hour.
Interviewer: Was that pretty good pay?
Donald: It was pretty good for me.
Interviewer: Then you went to the University of Michigan from there.
Donald: After a year of that, I decided I better get an education and then went to the University
of Michigan.
Interviewer: What was your class there?
Donald: Class of nineteen thirteen.
Interviewer: Nineteen thirteen and you were married in nineteen seventeen you said.
Donald: Nineteen seventeen.
Interviewer: Was Mrs. Denison, your first wife from Grand Rapids?

�12

Donald: No indeed. She was from Hinsdale, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago.
Interviewer: I see.
Donald: She had connections at White Lake where we had a summer cottage.
Interviewer: What was her maiden name?
Donald: Adeline Smith.
Interviewer: Adeline Smith. Now let me just take a look at these notes I made. After college
what did you do?
Donald: I got a job at the Ford Motor Company of Canada, in Walkerville right across from
Detroit and was there until practically, until the war.
Interviewer: Perhaps, I should have asked what did you major in at Michigan.
Donald: Literature, Science and the Arts, so called.
Interviewer: Did that?
Donald: They had no majors at that time, probably history.
Interviewer: I see.
Donald: I took a lot of history; there were no formal majors at that time.
Interviewer: The first job you took after college graduation was not in any way related to what
you studied at U of M?
Donald: That’s right.
Interviewer: And how long were you with Ford?
Donald: Three years.
Interviewer: Then you went into the service?
Donald: Then I went into the service.
Interviewer: Tell me about what you did, what rank you achieved and where you were and so
forth.
Donald: Well I went to first do is Training Camp at Fort Sheridan, received a commission as
First Lieutenant.
Interviewer: Then you went abroad?

�13

Donald: I never went abroad, Fort Sill Oklahoma the Artillery School, stayed there two years,
till the war was finished.
Interviewer: Then you returned to Grand Rapids?
Donald: In the meantime I was married. I was married just before going to Fort Sheridan. The
work down there was training, and firing practice on the firing ranges. I there got a captains
commission to the Ninth Artillery and we fired a lot of ammunition at no enemies. No, I didn’t
come back to Grand Rapids I came back to Detroit and got a job there with the National City
Company of New York, which was a (?) of the National City Bank of New York, selling bonds.
And there in and out of Municipal Bonds business for quite a few years.
Interviewer: Did you live in Detroit all those years?
Donald: I lived in Grosse Isle, just outside of Detroit twelve, thirteen years. Our children were
either born there or nearby, grew up there. Down the road from us a half- mile lived the Johnson
family, and Mrs. Johnson is upstairs here now.
Interviewer: So you met your second wife while you were living…
Donald: Oh, yes we were old friends; families were friends and neighbors for a dozen years.
Interviewer: And you were in and out of the bond business for a number of years?
Donald: I was in it…
Interviewer: How long did you stay in that business?
Donald: I stayed in that until the Second World War.
Interviewer: When did you return to Grand Rapids?
Donald: I returned to Grand Rapids in nineteen thirty-three, at the time of the bank failure.
Interviewer: Yes. Was that a pretty hard time for you?
Donald: That was a rather difficult time, yes.
Interviewer: As it was for a good many.
Donald: The job had shortly vanished. I was with the Guardian Company in Detroit which was
part of one of the banking groups that went down the precipice. [Union Guardian Trust Company
of Detroit]
Interviewer: Was that?
Donald: So I had no job for some time and no money, yes it was a difficult time.

�14

Interviewer: Was that Guardian Company in Detroit associated with the one in Cleveland?
Donald: No.
Interviewer: (?) Seems to me there was a group there…
Donald: At that time, having no job, I organized a company of my own, consisting of mostly
myself. And ventured into the municipal bond business for myself and was there for several
years and got along not too badly Then we moved back here.
Interviewer: Then you were in business downtown. Where were you located?
Donald: The Michigan Trust Building.
Interviewer: So your children received their education in Grand Rapids about that period?
Donald: Yes,
Interviewer: One of the things I know about you, because I have been there and known other
people that have summered there, for a great many years you have been going to White Lake,
north of Muskegon
Donald: My father had a cottage there and we have been going….
Interviewer: How long have you been going? When did your father first go there?
Donald: Went there in eighteen ninety-two. I was a year old when we went there.
Interviewer: Is that the cottage you had until recent years?
Donald: That is the cottage we had until recent years.
Interviewer: Were there already other people that had gone up there from Grand Rapids?
Donald: The Butterfields and the Taggerts
Interviewer: Did they go up before your father?
Donald: They both had gone up before that time, so.
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: By the time, I went up there I remember three Grand Rapids lawyers living right in a
row, Mr. Wilson became the fourth.
Interviewer: Mr. Hugh Wilson?
Donald: No, Mr. Charles Wilson.

�15

Interviewer: Charles Wilson?
Donald: So at that time then that made four Grand Rapids lawyers in a row.
Interviewer: How did you spend your time up there at White Lake?
Donald: Digging in the garden and sailing.
Interviewer: And I think, you maintained your interest in sailing at least until recent years.
Donald: Yes, until recently.
Interviewer: Did the families commute back and forth, I mean did your father have to come back
to Grand Rapids or did he go up there and spend long periods of time? How did it work out?
Donald: All those lawyers commuted weekends.
Interviewer: Did they drive?
Donald: No, drive what?
Interviewer: Not automobiles. Not in the early nineties.
Donald: Didn’t drive automobiles.
Interviewer: Took trains I suppose.
Donald: The Butterfields had horses, and they use to transport their horses up there, or bring
them up there. The fathers would commute weekends by train to Whitehall and then boat down
the lake.
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: And they would arrive either Friday night or Saturday night and leave very early
Monday morning and get back here the middle of the morning some time.
Interviewer: About what time of year would you open up your cottage up there?
Donald: When school closed.
Interviewer: I see.
Donald: Which was late in June.
Interviewer: And you must have known a lot of people up there over the years.

�16

Donald: There was a boarding house nearby called Partridges and many, many Grand Rapids
people use to go up there. Grand Rapids people that had cottages up there were, the Butterfields,
the Taggerts, the Wilsons, ourselves, the McNabbs, the Forbes’.
Interviewer: Quite a settlement.
Donald: Oh, yes.
Interviewer: and you don’t go to White Lake anymore, but you go nearby I understand.
Donald: Well, we go there, if I had a good strong arm, I could throw a stone into each lake.
Interviewer: There is a ridge between them.
Donald: Yes, there is a ridge in between.
Interviewer: I know that your family had some connection with the Congregational Church, at
one point with Park Church. Is that a family tradition that your family was Congregationalists
going way back, or…?
Donald: Yes, the grandparents, Denisons, were early members of that church. My family were;
the Barlows were very active in it.
Interviewer: I will just shut this off for a moment.
END of Side One
Interviewer: We will start again on this side and this time we’re going to talk about a letter you
received from a young man the other day and your reply. It involves football at the University of
Michigan. Why don’t you read parts of the letter you like to? This is your reply, I take it.
Donald: It is too long for this business, isn’t it?
Interviewer: No, it’s not too long. You can read as much or as little as you wish. Why don’t you
read, maybe you should start with his inquiry. You received this letter the other day you said.
Donald: Received this letter from a young man in Ann Arbor. He said for the past two years I
have been very interested in the history of football here at the U of M and someday I hope to
write a book. I was wondering if you can recall about your football days here. I believe you were
a reserve halfback in nineteen ten, eleven and twelve weighing one hundred and one and five feet
eleven tall. What were your teammates such as Benny Bender, Colin Quinn, Stan Wells, (?)
Conklin and others. Do any games or instance standout? What kind of coach was Yost? It might
interest you to know that as of nineteen seventy-two the alumni association numbers over one
hundred surviving members of your nineteen thirteen class.
Interviewer: Now, this is your reply.

�17

Donald: This is my reply: Dear Bob, Your letter was like a bombshell, imagine anyone knowing
or caring about the activities of a third string football player of sixty years ago. I didn’t know
whether to laugh or cry. Well, you deserve a good answer and I will try to give you something.
What kind of coach was Yost? He was a good one. He loved football and he taught us
personally. He didn’t sit in his office, if he had one, and direct his assistants. In fact, he only had
one or two and didn’t let them do much. And every practice scrimmage he was in the middle,
correcting and exhorting. He could whack a slowpoke on the back with a full swing and it was
no love pat. At this time, he was perhaps thirty-five years old, strong, lean and tough. To
demonstrate the use of hands on defense, he would grab one by the shoulder and toss them aside
like a leaf. He liked to demonstrate the way to catch the ball. He would put his left hand with
palm inward in front of his chest and say in his slightly southern drawl this hand says it can’t
bound on back, you know. And place his right hand palm up waist high and say this hand says it
can’t fall thru, you know. He was a Civil War buff and loved to compare war and football tactics.
As for General Lee holding the line, Jackson ran the end. He was ahead of his time about
vitamins. When the squad came into the training table, each place was set with a large salad and
you ate that before you got anything else. He didn’t like to lose anymore than Woody Hayes. In
the last game nineteen five, after five years of straight wins, Chicago took it two to nothing. Five
years later, Yost was still maintaining that the officials made a ghastly mistake and that it really
was a touchback and not a safety. Another famous game before my time which was in Chicago
was billed as a battle of ages between the two supermen, Heston of Michigan Eckersall of
Chicago. Eckersall ran faster but Heston ran harder and Michigan twenty-two- Chicago twelve.
At age thirteen, I went my parents by special train from Grand Rapids. My memory of the actual
game is a little vague, but a song of the Michigan rooters perhaps ten-thousand strong so tickled
me that I have never forgotten it. It ran “Eckersall, Eckersall, when you are running with the ball,
you could take an awful fall, Ecky Ecky Break your necky, Eckersall.”
Later in college I could sing that song, nobody else knew it.
Another game I remember well was a practice one, between the varsity and the reserves better
know as a scrubbish. I was backing up the line for the scrubbish and having great success in
sifting thru and tackling the varsity backs before they got started. My teammates all patted me on
the back and told me how good I was, and I thought so too, but Yost didn’t seem to notice. A few
days later I was having a beer with my good friend Tom Vogel, who was a regular and very good
varsity lineman and while discussing this incident, he asked me did Yost say anything to you? I
said no. Tom said, didn’t you know that I was letting you through. I thought you could do with a
little recognition. He fooled me but he didn’t fool Yost. Does that sound like anything?…
Interviewer: Yes, it sounds interesting. Was this, was George Thompson at Michigan at that
time? What was his class?
Donald: Yes, nineteen twelve.

�18

Interviewer: Only a year apart.
Donald: Yes.
Interviewer: Do you remember any of his football exploits? I guess he was considered one of
Michigan’s greats in those days.
Donald: I remember how hard he hit when you tried to tackle him.
Interviewer: Yes.
Donald: He was tough, didn’t try to tackle him many times. We used to play these semi
games….
Interviewer: We lost a little bit of the other side of the tape. And I want to go back to the story of
going to the Kent Country Club again. Just as if we hadn’t heard it before, will you try to repeat
it for me?
Donald: Alright. The other day I was asked how long I had been going to the Kent Country Club
and I recalled an early incident. In high school time perhaps nineteen six a high school fraternity
party was at Kent Country Club and I told my parents I had asked a girl. It was the first time I
had taken a girl anywhere to go to this party and I would have to have a cab because that is what
everyone else is having. It didn’t mean a taxicab like today, it meant a horse drawn vehicle. My
parents weren’t enthused about that. They said when they went to the same club as they
frequently did, they went by streetcar and they opinioned that I could go by streetcar. Julius
Amberg, a classmate, came to the rescue. His father had horses, and Julius and his girl and I and
my girl went in style in a closed carriage with a coachman driving.
Interviewer: Ordinarily you took the streetcar.
Donald: Ordinarily everyone took the streetcar.
Interviewer: Where did you board the streetcar and what…?
Donald: We boarded the streetcar on Lyon Street in front of our house, rode on it down to the
foot of Lyon at Monroe, Canal then. Took the Plainfield line out to Carrier Street and there
transferred to a little one-horse line that went from Carrier Street out the remaining few blocks
Kent.
Interviewer: Was that…
Donald: That car shuttled back and forth.
Interviewer: Was it an electrical line?
Donald: No, it was. Sure it was trolley cars, overhead trolley.

�19

Interviewer: Yes, that went right to Kent Country Club?
Donald: It shuttled between Plainfield and Kent Country Club, Plainfield Avenue just beyond
Leonard.
Interviewer: And you are still going out to the Kent Country Club, but not by streetcar anymore.
I take it you spend a little time there when you’re in Grand Rapids.
Donald: I go most every day and hit some practice balls if nothing else. I’m still hoping to
improve my swing.
Interviewer: You may!
Donald: I may!
Interviewer: Is there some tournament coming up in the near future? I thought I heard your wife
speak that you are getting ready for some big event.
Donald: I have a friend in Detroit that is an excellent golfer and he would like to come over here
and play in a … I’ve forgotten what they call it; visitor’s tournament of some kind. That’s not the
actual….
Interviewer: I see.
Donald: That’s not the actual…
Interviewer: Sure, I know what you mean, but I don’t know the name either. I’m not a golfer ….
Donald: I’m practicing up so I don’t disgrace him too badly.
Interviewer: That’s good, now you have lived on in this neighborhood Lyon Street in this house
a great deal of your life. I am interested in getting you thinking about the changes that have
occurred and you mentioned that you thought there was quite a little continuity as far as this
particular part of the city if concerned.
Donald: As far as this block and street, all of the houses have stayed the same. Most of them
have been divided into a varying number of apartments.
Interviewer: Who lived on either side of you?
Donald: My early recollection, names leave me….
Interviewer: That’s not too important now. Just name some other families that lived in this
block….
Donald: Alright, the Sears family lived in this building, the two Sears brothers and one across
the street in what was later the Stewart house.

�20

Interviewer: Steketees must have lived….
Donald: Steketees lived on the corner.
Interviewer: I seem to recall Charlie Campbell lived…
Donald: Charlie Campbell lived in the Steketee house after it was made into the apartments
much later.
Interviewer: Didn’t they live in the little house?
Donald: The Campbells lived in three houses around here, the old Steketee house, the little
house, and in an apartment down the street. I think they lived in the Steketee house when Charlie
died.
Interviewer: I think that is true. Has the neighborhood changed a great deal, do you think?
Donald: Well, it’s held surprisingly well, so I suppose it changes because it is all apartments.
Donald: The houses are externally unchanged.
Interviewer: Go back to that house on Lyon Street where you were born. About when was that
house built?
Donald: I can almost plot it probably there, because I think that it was new when my father and
mother were married and moved in to it, and that was Eighty-six, that’s about when it was built.
Mr. Henry Idema built it on the vacant lot across the street. He lived on the other side of the
street for speculation or investment perhaps, and sold it to my father when it was new.
Interviewer: Well, it is still standing.
Donald: It is still standing and with the Idema house across the street, it is one of most
respectable ones there.
Interviewer: And you had two brothers you mentioned.
Donald: A younger brother and an older brother.
Interviewer: And who was the older brother?
Donald: That was John, some four years older than I, went to Chicago and spent his life in a
bank there. Younger brother Arthur disappeared from a ship at sea.
Interviewer: Really.
Donald: At about thirty years of age.

�21

Interviewer: I hate to ask this question, but what year were you born?
Donald: Eighteen ninety-one.
Interviewer: I could have reconstructed that, I guess.
Donald: You could figure that one out?
Interviewer: You’re in your middle eighties at this point.
Donald: Middle aged, let’s say.
Interviewer: Middle-aged.
Donald: That’s better. Very lucky physically, as well as I ever was.
Interviewer: That’s great. I think this has been a delightful interview, I might say that for the
benefit for whoever listens to this someday. I came completely unprepared and discovered I
didn’t have the little adapter to go on the plug, so Mr. Denison had the bright idea of just driving
up the street and picking one up, which we did and we finally got the thing going. I must say, I
didn’t even know we had a little electrical store a few blocks away that would have such an item,
so with that I’ll turn it off and you can get ready to go to the Kent Country Club if that’s where
you are going next.
INDEX

A
Amberg, Julius · 19

B

Denison, Arthur Carter (Father) · 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16,
19, 21
Denison, Cornelia Carter (Grandmother) · 5
Denison, Julius Coe (Grandfather) · 1, 3, 4, 5, 11
Dykema Family · 9

F

Baker, Milton D. · 7, 8
Barlow Family · 9, 10, 17
Butterfield Family · 15, 16

Ford Motor Company · 12
Fountain Street School · 10

C

G

Campbell Family · 21
Central Grammar School · 10
Congregational Church · 17

Grand Rapids High School · 11

D

Idema Family · 9

Denison, Adeline Smith (1st Wife) · 1, 5, 12

I

�22

J

T

Johnson Family · 6, 14

Taggert, Edward · 6
Taggert, Moses · 6
Thompson, George · 18

K
Kent Country Club · 5, 19, 20, 22

U

M

Union Guardian Trust Company of Detroit · 14
University of Michigan · 6, 12, 17

Macey Furniture Factory · 11

N
National City Company of New York · 13

S
Sears Family · 20
Sligh, Charles · 8
Steketee Family · 20

W
Wanty, Judge · 6
Warneke, Otto · 11
White Lake · 12, 15, 16
Whitman Family · 9
Wilson, Charles (Great-Uncle) · 6, 15

Y
Yost, Bob · 17, 18

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="25125">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/978ab47bd2d42adf7a9c785273e8a700.mp3</src>
        <authentication>d370388d6f30ad9249010349122827b6</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="16">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407229">
                  <text>Grand Rapids Oral Histories</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407230">
                  <text>Heritage Hill (Grand Rapids, Mich.)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765888">
                  <text>Local histories</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765889">
                  <text>Memoirs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765890">
                  <text>Michigan--History</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765891">
                  <text>Oral histories (document genre)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407231">
                  <text>Taped and transcribed interviews conducted in the early 1970s primarily of the children and grandchildren of many of the founders of Grand Rapids, Michigan; many of whom were residents of the Heritage Hill neighborhood. Interviews were collected to develop a significant collection of oral resources that would supplement other primary and secondary local history materials. Initially funded as a private project, Grand Valley State College (now University) assumed responsibility for continuing the project until 1977.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407232">
                  <text>Various</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407233">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/452"&gt;Grand Rapids oral history collection (RHC-23)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407234">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407235">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407236">
                  <text>application/pdf; audio/mp3</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407237">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407238">
                  <text>Text; Sound</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407239">
                  <text>RHC-23</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="407240">
                  <text>1971 - 1977</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="5">
      <name>Sound</name>
      <description>A resource primarily intended to be heard. Examples include a music playback file format, an audio compact disc, and recorded speech or sounds.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="407994">
                <text>RHC-23_50Denison</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="407995">
                <text>Denison, Donald</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="407996">
                <text>Denison, Donald</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="407997">
                <text>Donald Denison was born in Grand Rapids, graduated from the University of Michigan ca. 1913, and served in WWI.  His father was a judge who was appointed by President Taft in 1911 to the U.S. District Court of Appeals. Mr. Denison's father resigned as a judge in 1931 to enter private practice with the firm of Newton Baker, President Wilson's Secretary of War. Mr. Denison sold bonds through National City and his own company. He died August 21, 1983.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="407999">
                <text>Michigan--History</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408000">
                <text>Local histories</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408001">
                <text>Memoirs</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408002">
                <text>Oral histories (document genre)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408003">
                <text>Grand Rapids (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408004">
                <text>Personal narratives</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408005">
                <text>Heritage Hill (Grand Rapids, Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408006">
                <text>Grand Valley State University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="408007">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="408008">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="408009">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408010">
                <text>Sound</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="408011">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="408012">
                <text>audio/mp3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="408014">
                <text>Grand Rapids oral history collection (RHC-23)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="440417">
                <text>1975</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1029736">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="22495" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="24999" order="1">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7099f06bf3c907857377b07ef649d826.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a27ea3d6371ee8b97427ae51bfeb5202</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="404991">
                    <text>Cpl. Earl Dennis Diary Highlights

April 9th, 1942: Inducted into the Army at Camp Custer, Battle Creek, Michigan
April 18th

: Arrived at Jefferson Barracks, Missouri

June 1st

: Arrived at Groton, Connecticut

June 2nd

: Started to cook

July 15th

: Boarded Louis Pasteur

July 16th

: Left New York Harbor for Freetown, Sierra Leone

July 24th

: Arrived in Freetown,

July 25th

: Left Freetown for Durban, South Africa

August 3rd

: Arrived in Durban, South Africa

August 6th

: Left Durban, South Africa for Port Suez, Egypt

August 18th

: Left for and arrived in Haifa, Palestine (Israel)

August 21st

: Haifa bombed. Watched the flashes as German planes flew over all night

September 9th : Left for El Alamein, Egypt.
October 1st

: Promoted to Private First Class

October 23-27 : Account of Second Battle of El Alamein
October 24th

: Made 1st Cook

November 16th : Passed through Tobruk, Libya. Described the devastation of the town and the
carnage on the road from Alexandria, Egypt to Tobruk
December 2nd : Spent the day in Derna, Libya
December 7th

: Left Derna, Libya for Ajdabiya (Agedabia], Libya

December 10th : Arrived in Ajdabiya, Libya
December 11th : Attacked by a German bomber. Anti-aircraft shot the bomber down. Two of the
crew were killed, but a third survived
December 13th : Third German bomber crewman died the night before

�December 18th : Became 1st Cook again after sergeant was transferred to another squadron
December 24th : American rations come in. Sprains back.
December 25th : Went to Doc for sleeping pills and aspirins. Had another sandstorm. Good
Christmas dinner
December 31st : Left Ajdabiya, Libya for the front. Stopped at night to rest. Watched the
bombing of Marble Arch, Libya. Rode in cab of truck with bad back.
January 1st, 1943 : Passed through Marble Arch. Roads and bridges shredded from bombs
January 4th
: Arrived at new airfield. 16 German ME-109’s strafed and bombed the convoy as
soon as they arrived. 7 men killed and twenty were wounded. 10 more died the next day
January 6-16th : Continued German bombing. 3 Pilots and 5 Enlisted men were detailed as being
killed.
January 19th

: Left the airfield for Dufan, Libya

January 20th : Arrived in Dufan, Libya with “A” echelon. Fighters keep harassing the German
retreat to Tripoli
January 23rd

: Tripoli falls in the morning. This was the main task

February 4th : Received pay. Recounted baking till 2AM then going back on duty at noon.
Made pumpkin pies and bread.
February 9th : Passes to Cairo, Egypt cancelled. Move to Castle Banda canceled as well. One
stove working. Pancakes for breakfast
February 14th : Packages from home came. One from parents, Gertie (his wife), Shirley, and
Mary Lou Byrges. Sandstorm let up.
February 28th : No missions. Had a fever of 101 degrees and a bad back. Went to see Captain
Cook in the 66th squadron. Stayed in bed. Cold wind all night. Went to the slit trench once.
Bombs fell all night and almost took out the heater
March 1st
: Airfield ahead was attacked. Enemy has broken the lines and a group in the
squadron is moving up to stop them, followed by more later. Raid to be expected
March 7th
: Received a new tent. The old one was shredded. Poole helped put the new one up
away from the fort. The fort has become the new Non-Commissioned Officer’s club. 2 German
planes flew over the kitchen and everyone ran for cover.

�March 15th
: Big mission. 5 planes and pilots lost. Flares and bombs dropped. American
bombers flew over as well. Kitchen and chow line for the 79th strafed killing 20 men.
March 21st
: Moved up 28 miles. Could see the Mareth Line from the position. 2 German
planes flew over at 5:30PM. At night flares were dropped, and heavy anti-aircraft was seen
March 24th
: Got shots for typhoid. Pilots went on one mission. General Strickland and Gen.
Guard (sp) inspected and had dinner.
April 4th
: Pulled out at 2PM and went to a field 1 mile south of Medenine. Pitched tent in
a wadi (valley) under an olive tree. Just west are the mountains of the Mareth Line
April 7th

: Sfax, Tunisia fell

April 9th
: Inducted into the service a year ago. One mile south of Medenine and within
sight of the Mareth Line.
April 12th
: Pulled out. Went through Medinine and Gabes and joined “B” party about 50
miles south of Sfax. Headquarters’ stove blew up, fed part of their personnel as well
: Pulled out again. Went through Sfax going to a field near El Djem, Tunisia
April 14th
about 50 miles from Sousse.
April 18th
: Details Roman colosseum near field. Ju-88 bomber circled the field, but antiaircraft guns drove him away. At 5PM 80 to 100 German transports flew over from Sicily. The
group, along with others, went to meet them. 77 German planes were shot down, 18 being
credited to the 65th. (This was the “Palm Sunday Massacre”)
May 1st

: Paid in francs. Rainy. Pilots had 2 missions

May 7th
: “The Yacht Club Boys” performed for the troops. 3 replacements came in.
Tunis and Bizerte fell.
May 12th
: Artillery still firing all night to the west. Signed payroll. END OF WAR IN
AFRICA. Celebrated by shooting flares and guns
May 22nd
: Went to Sousse and went swimming in the Mediterranean Sea. Souse is 35
miles from Kairouan, Tunisia. Ships sunk in harbor and town is wrecked from battle
May 24th
: Pulled out and arrived on a beach about 50 miles from Zarzis, Tunisia. Half of
the group stayed behind in Kairouan to train new pilots.
June 8th
were killed

: The 33rd Fighter Group was bombed and strafed. 25 men from the ground crew

�June 15th
: Part of the 65th caught up. 60 men left at Cape Bon. Clothing check and bags
have to be packed by 6PM June 16th. No one knows where they are going
June 30th

: Hot day. Received orders to leave for Tripoli on July 2nd and leave on a ship

July 2nd

: Left for Tripoli. Arrived at 4:30PM. 136 degrees in the shade

July 3rd

: Boarded a barge to Malta

July 4th

: Arrived in Valletta, Malta. Drove about 10 kilometers and set up

July 10th

: Invasion of Sicily.

July 13th
: Pulled out to a field on Malta. Received 15 letters from home. Planes from the
th
65 Fighter Squadron came in as well
July 15th
: Moved out to a field near Hamrun, Malta. Kitchens are in old wrecked concrete
buildings with the cooks sleeping on the roof
July 18th

: Left Malta on invasion barges. Lived on K rations for the day.

July 19th

: Arrived in Pozzallo, Sicily.

July 26th
: An hour before daylight, German air raid. Italians celebrate Mussolini’s
assassination. [He was not assassinated, but was dismissed and arrested]
July 31st
: Pulled out for central Sicily. Got lost and was 3 miles from the front lines. Heavy
artillery was firing over group
August 2nd
: Hot day. Catania, Sicily was shelled by the British and American Navy. Big
flashes seen all night. Mt. Etna is within sight. 2 planes shot down, 1 pilot killed, another in the
Mediterranean.
August 11th

: Lost 2 planes. Mt. Etna smoking

August 12th : Germans attacked for an hour overnight. 32 men killed and 45 wounded nearby. 3
fires set and an ammo dump lit up the countryside
August 17th : Messina, Sicily taken by the Americans. No more Germans on Sicily, except a
few snipers. Very hot day
August 22nd : Pitched a game of baseball against the officers and won. During the game a P-40
overshot the runway and crashed. Pilot was ok, but the plane was upside down (Last entry)

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="51533" order="2">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d2e84ddf50255e6aaa7807a4f015ec14.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f276b6b6b5775069d335cd4420e96b7d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="882805">
                    <text>WWII Diary of Cpl. Earl L. Dennis
65th Fighter Squadron, 57th Fighter Group
Middle Eastern, North African, &amp; European Theaters
Transcribed by Thomas A. Dennis, Feb., 2012.

Preface:
My dad grew up on a small farm, along with 5 other siblings, about 5 miles west of
Coopersville, MI. He met my mother, Gertrude R Mosulff, originally from
Cheboygan, MI, in Detroit in the late 1930's where both were working. They were
married on June 9, 1941. Dad later was drafted at the age of 29, only 10 months after
being married.
The 57th Fighter Group, consisting of squadrons 64, 65, and 66, was the first American
aviation unit to see combat in the North African and Mediterranean theaters. They
arrived in Port Suez on August 16, 1942 and were attached to the British 8 th Army to
fly support for them and other units later in the war when Sicily and Italy were invaded.
The 57th was the first American fighter group to shoot down a German plane in North
Africa and had the highest kill to loss ratio of any other unit. They also held the record
for shooting down 74 German planes in one single air battle known as the “Palm
Sunday Massacre” on April 18th, 1943.
In North Africa, the squadrons flew P-40 fighters and later in the war, while stationed
on Corsica, they were the first to fly P-47 fighter bombers against the enemy in Italy in
operation “Strangle” to cut supply lines. The 65 th squadron was also the first to attach
two 1,000 lb bombs to a fighter. This, along with eight .50 cal machine guns, and later
six 5" rockets, made the P-47 quite a formidable weapon. By the time the war ended in
Italy, the 57th Fighter Group had been awarded 3 Presidential Citations and 2 French
Croix De Guerre medals for their actions.
My dad didn’t talk much about the war as I was growing up. Not until after his death in
2002, did we find his diaries. After reading them, I have the utmost admiration for him
and the others that endured the hardships and “death from above” while fighting that
war.

Page 1

�April, 1942

9th - Inducted into the U.S. army at Camp Custer Michigan.
10th - 3 inches of snow. Vaccination in one arm and a shot in the other.
Swept and mopped the barracks. Fire guard duty, lights out at 9:00 PM.
11th - Fire guard duty and runner. Detail duty at warehouse.
12th - Got up at 6:45. My folks, Uncle Vin., Dorothy, Jay, Carol, and
Shirley came to see me today.
13th - Watched men drill and some that got shipped out. Went to a show
tonight.
14th - Watched men off.
18th - Boarded the train and landed at Jefferson Barracks Missouri at
10:00 PM.
19th - Different tests and processing for one week. 18 days of steady
drill.
20th - Guard duty.
21st - Stand in Retreat, Manual of Arms, and Bayonet practice.
22nd - I drilled a bunch of 40 recruits.
23rd - Drill instruction.
24th - Drilled 6 day men.

May, 1942
29th - Boarded the train. 4 hours in Chicago.
30th - Ate breakfast in Philadelphia. Changed trains in New York City.
31st - Arrived in Boston, MA at 4:00 PM. Stayed here about 24 hours.
Bad food! Left here in a truck convoy.
Page 2

�June, 1942

1st - Arrived at Groton, CT.
2nd - Started cooking today.
8th - Went to Rentscler Field near Hartford, CT, a field of pig weeds
and no running water.

July, 1942
5th - Went to Fort Dix in New Jersey.
15th - Boarded the Louise Pasteur ship at 8:00 PM. Emergency drill.
Slept in the harbor. A 30,000 ton ship, 5,000 men on board. An escort
of 2 destroyers and 2 planes.
16th - Left New York harbor at 8:00 AM. Port holes and windows
closed. The Louis Pasteur has 4,800 soldiers on board. At noon 2 depth
charges were shot at a German sub.
17th - Yesterday afternoon 2 more submarines were depth charged. One
of them sank. Oil on the water. We wear our life preservers at all times.
Sweating the chow line. Quit sea, flying fish were seen all over.
18th - Our escort sighted a sub today and sank another one. The escort
went back, so now we are on our own. Sighted a raft and life belt. We
are setting our clocks ahead 1 hour at midnight.
19th - Sea is choppy. Sunday services on the “A” deck. Slept on the
deck last night. Flying fish, sharks, and porpoises seen all day.
Beautiful sunset.
20th - Sea is choppy. Physical exercises today. Many men are seasick.
The ship fired its 20mm guns today as a test. Poor chow - mutton, soup,
and tea day in and day out - caused a lot of arguments.
21st - We are now 300 miles off Bermuda Is. Rifle and general
inspection. I located Appel on “C” deck today, a friend from Grand
Haven, MI. Clocks set ahead I hour tonight.
22nd - Sea choppy. A soldier dropped his rifle overboard today. I was
Page 3

�put on a detail for the day.
23rd - We sighted a friendly ship. Two whales and some sharks were
seen. Also, a periscope from a German sub was seen sticking out of the
water about a half mile away. We made a sudden turn which almost
tipped the ship on edge. Physical inspection.
24th - Arrived in Freetown, Africa at 4:00 PM. Docked in the middle of
the harbor and stayed there all night. A bunch of natives came over in
small canoes. We dropped pennies in the water and they would dive for
them. Grass houses and palm trees. Another shot in the arm.
25th - Left Freetown at 5:30 AM today in the rain. Headed towards
Cape Town.
26th - Sea rough. Sighted a friendly ship. We are close to the equator
and the weather is very hot. Hundreds of flying fish all over.
27th - Sea is quiet. We had a picture show today. Went to intelligence
class on “C” deck. Lecture on gas and gas masks. Torpedoed at twice
today.
28th - Weather is cooler. Inspection - rifle, feet, mess kits, and gas
masks. A wireless picked up that we were sunk yesterday, and all lost,
just off of Freetown by the Axis.
29th - Weather cooler and sea rougher.
30th - Sea rough and weather cold. We changed to heavy clothes. Two
whales seen today.
31st - I was put on a detail today to distribute some Red Cross sewing
kits, etc. All the cooks caught this. We carried them up from the lower
deck.
August, 1942
1st - We are about 150 miles off of Cape Town. A friendly ship was
sighted on the port side. We were paid $5.00 today as a partial
payment. Sea is very rough. No sleep at all last night. Guns, mess kits,
Page 4

�etc. were thrown about the ship from the high waves.
2nd - Sea very rough. We were all watching for land most of the day,
but none was seen.
3rd - Arrived at Durban, South Africa at 9:00 AM. Remained on boat all
night. South African soldiers came on the dock and sang for us and we
sang for them. A beautiful mountainous harbor.
4th - We had shore leave from 11:30 AM to 8:00 PM and had to keep
with at least 5 in a group. The two story buses were free to us. Native
rickshaw pullers. I visited a zoo, saw a show, watched the celebration
of the King’s birthday, and ate 6 meals today. Blackout on ship, a
soldier was injured
5th - Shore leave from 11:30 AM to 7:30 PM. Two fellows and I took a
ride on a bus for a sight seeing trip. A very enjoyable day. Bought a
few souvenirs and had several dishes of ice cream. Saw some Italian
prisoners.
6th - Left Durban at 8:00 AM. Sea is quit. Two whales were seen tied to
a boat. One fellow came to the boat late and got left behind so he had
someone with a speed boat catch up with us. He climbed up a rope
ladder.
7th - Sea is choppy. Rifle inspection today. We are now near the island
of Madagascar.
8th - Sea is quiet. Nothing but water.
9th - This is our 4th Sunday on the sea. Church services on the deck.
10th - Sea is quiet. Did exercises. Warmer weather. Lots of flying fish
and porpoises.
11th - Rifle and mess kit inspection today. Saw one whale.
12th - Sea is quiet. We had 4 full weeks of sailing today. Weather is hot.
Near the equator again.
Page 5

�13th - Weather is very hot. We entered the Gulf of Aden early this
morning and sighted land. The Red Sea. I saw several sharks,
porpoises, sword fish, and whales today. Two ships were seen on the
port side.
14th - Weather is very hot. About 12 ships were seen and several small
islands and all kinds of fish. Gas mask drill at every formation.
15th - Weather is very hot. Islands were seen today. Physical inspection
again.
16th - Arrived at Port Suez today. We got off in small boats operated by
natives out in the harbor. Today we passed Mt. Sinai in Arabia.
17th - Another fellow and I worked in the kitchen with some natives.
They were driven around with whips.
18th - We got up at 3:30 AM and boarded a wog train. Rode all day thru
hot, dusty, and sandy dessert. I stood guard on two cars and pushed one
native off as he tried to step on in a wog village. Arrived at Haifa,
Palestine at 2:00 PM and went in trucks to Maquibila, (about 45 miles).
19th - We heard that our supply ship was sunk with all trucks, bunks,
etc. We have to sleep on a cement floor now. This field is just 20 miles
from Nazareth. Our pilots are on the island of Cyprus now, but will be
here soon.
20th - The weather here is very hot and dry. Flies are thick. Nightmares
kept a lot of guys awake all night. Most of our kitchen tools were lost
with the other supplies.
21st - Haifa was bombed last night. We all got up and watched the
flashes. German planes flew over us all night.
22nd - Us cooks took a truck today and went swimming in a pool where
they say David and Gulyas were at. It was a rock bottom spring near a
mountain not far from Nazareth. The water was very clear and
refreshing. Minnows would nibble our toes if we stood still.
23rd - Major Salesbury flew here from Cyprus and told us we would go
Page 6

�to the dessert soon near the front line.
24th - Tonight at 5:30, Crow, Esperson, and I started out afoot to Haifa,
a distance of 45 miles. We got two rides and got there soon after dark.
We ate some wog food in a place and then tried to sleep on the
sidewalk while one of us stood guard. The Arabs got too thick so we
moved on.
25th - We awoke at 6:00 AM and started back to camp. We spent the
rest of the of the night sleeping on the floor of an English depot. About
half way back, we passed King Solomon’s stables which were on the
side of a mountain. Holes were dug all over from curiosity.
26th - The water truck busted down today so we are out of water. We
are very short of trucks, as our own were sunk. We had a late supper
because we had no water.
27th - Still no water today. The weather is getting hot and quite a few
are sick.
28th - A very hot day.
29th - Appel and I went to Nazareth today. We started at 5:00 PM and
got one ride. As soon as we got there, we were surrounded by about a
dozen kids who wanted to show us around, since we were the only
Americans there. We picked out one little kid to show us Christ’s
workshop and a few noted churches, etc. There was no place to sleep. It
was so dirty around we couldn’t sleep anyway, so we started back to
camp, 20 miles distance. We went back down the mountain at 8:00 PM
and reached camp at 4:00 AM all tired out.
September, 1942
9th - We left for the front today near El Alamein, Egypt in the dessert on
an old wog train.
11th - Muqeibila, Palestine bombed and destroyed (the place we left on
the 9th).
26th - Spent all day in Alexandria, Egypt. Bought souvenirs and ate.
Page 7

�Went with Fisher and Dunnahoe.
October, 1942
1st - I was made PFC today.
13th - Dunnahoe and I went to Alexandria, took some pictures, and did
my Xmas shopping. Sent Gertie’s package out. Came back in a pickup
with the PX supplies, 4 of us.
15th - A terrible sand storm started at noon and blew all night and part
of the next day. The worst storm I’ve ever seen. At night when I tried to
sleep, sand would come in and cover everything like a snow drift. It
was hard to breath without the gas mask.
23rd - The “big push” started in Egypt at 10:30 PM. A steady rumble of
heavy artillery all night.
24th - Railroad and 14 cars of our supply line was bombed. Black
smoke seen all day. Became 1st cook today.
25th - 3 enemy planes were shot down by one of our pilots today.
26th - 2 more enemy planes were shot down by Lt. Wymond.
27th - Big tank push.
November, 1942
9th - We are traveling towards the front and sleeping wherever night
overtakes us. Slept under a truck last night. A bomb hit near and shook
the truck.
13th - An English truck ran onto a booby trap and blew up right in front
of us. The ground is still full of them (mines) which were set by the
Germans.
14th - Went thru Hells Fire Pass. While coming down the mountain, we
hit another truck on a sharp curve. I was riding on top of the truck as a
lookout at the time. Later, the top fell in but no one was hurt.
Page 8

�16th - We went thru Tobruk today and saw burning buildings, a terrible
destruction. Thousands of trucks, planes, and tanks scattered all over in
ruins all the way from Alexandria. Dead bodies were along the road.
21st - At 4:00 AM, we were bombed. A Jerry tried to destroy our water
hole. The bombs hit within 100 yards of it. Our ack-ack shells were
bursting by the hundreds but couldn’t hit him. Our P-40's were up after
him but the gunfire was too hot for them to do much fighting. I made
tracks for the nearest hole at a rapid speed.
23rd - A German Messersmitt was shot down over the sea.
30th - A German plane flew over and dropped 4 bombs at the water hole
about 4:00 AM but all missed.
December, 1942
1st - Bombed early this morning near water hole. Two men killed in a
truck by strafing German plane. We all ran for the slit trench. Dive
bomber dove 3 times, 7 flares dropped.
2nd - Spent one day in Derna, Libya, a very beautiful scene from a
distance down the mountain. All buildings just plastered with holes
from gunfire and bombs. Narrow dirty streets. Souvenirs for sale from
Germans and Italians.
4th - One air raid last night. Flares and 4 bombs dropped, no damage.
5th - We had 4 bomb raids early this morning. The first at 11:30 PM,
then 2:00 AM, 3:00 AM, and then at 5:00 AM. Killed one man and
wounded 3 in the 66th Squadron. Running for slit trench all night, no
sleep, flares being dropped.
6th - Pilots left for the front near Tunisia. Raining everyday. Trenches
very muddy.
7th - Left the field near Derna and headed for Ajdabiya, Libya, a 3 day
ride. Beautiful mountain scenery west and south of Derna. Destruction
all along the way - planes, trucks, buildings, etc.
Page 9

�8th - I rode on top of the truck as a lookout. Near Cyrene, we were
stopped by some machine gun fire ahead of us. Nothing happened to
the convoy.
9th - A plane came right down the road at one place. We stopped the
trucks and ran from the road. It turned out to be a friendly plane.
10th - Arrived in desert 20 miles from Ajdabiya at 5:00 PM. The first
thing we did was to dig a slit trench as things were kind of hot. The
ground is very rocky here with light sand.
11th - At 3:30 PM today, a German bomber flew very low over us and
started strafing but no damage was done to us. We opened up with
heavy ack-ack fire and shot him down. I watched him burst into flames
and crash to the ground. Two men were killed in the plane and a third
badly injured with a broken back and both legs. We buried the dead
right there. We all hit the ground before this happened with bullets
whistling over our heads.
13th - The other Jerry died last night.
18th - Sgt. Schlemmer got transferred to another squadron. Went back
to field 174 near Alexandria. Became 1st cook again.
19th - At 4:30 this morning flares were dropped near Alexandria and
bombs blew 3 trucks to pieces. One man’s legs were cut off by shrapnel
as he was running for a hole.
20th - Sand storm.
21st - Sand storm.
24th - American rations flew in today. Sprained my back.
25th - Called on Doc at 1:30 AM for sleeping pill and aspirins. Sand
blew all day. Swell Xmas dinner.
26th - Thunder storm last night.
28th - Formation
Page 10

�31st - Left this field at Ajdabiya 10:00 AM and headed towards the
front. Pulled beside the road for the night. Just after dark, we watched
the bombing of Marble Arch, a large airdrome. Very pretty fireworks.
Rode in the cab with lame back.
January, 1943
1st - Passed thru Marble Arch, a large arch over the road. The roads
were all cut up and bombed for hundreds of miles. Bridges were blown
up, so we went around them on mountainsides.
2nd - Still on our way west thru the desert. Left the main road at Nufilia
and traveled southwest across the desert. A bad sand storm came up
and blew all night.
3rd - Sand storm so bad that we didn’t move a foot. We were about 1
mile from the field we were going to, about 20 miles from the front
line. Low on water and no sign of anymore.
4th - Left here at 1:30 PM and just as we stopped at the new field still in
the convoy, 16 German ME-109's attacked us strafing and bombing.
They killed 7 men and wounded 20. I ran for a truck and about half
way there, I dropped and crawled the rest of the way. Shells and
shrapnel were hitting all around me.
5th - Ten more fellows died today from yesterday’s raid. My back is still
lame but I managed to help dig my slit trench. No water found yet.
6th - We were attacked today by 20 German ME-109's. We were all
gathered around the kitchen eating dinner at the time. They strafed us
and dropped 9 bombs on the line. Still no water. Bombed again at
supper time, killing 3 men and injuring a few. Everyone is very
nervous.
7th - We were strafed and bombed at 9:00 this morning by 6 German
planes. Again at 2:00 PM by 4 more planes and again at 6:00 PM by 12
planes. About 21 bombs came down. Watched a dog fight between 2
British Spitfires and 2 German ME-109's. Ack-ack shot 7 planes down
in the last 3 days. One tonight. Two more men killed.
Page 11

�8th - This morning a bunch of Spitfires intercepted some ME’s. We
watched the dog fights. Two Jerry’s were shot down. One English pilot
had his foot shot off but jumped safely. We had 5 air raids today, but
not much damage was done. Everyone’s nerves are on edge.
9th - At 3:00 this morning 12 German JU-88's bombers flew over us but
no damage was done. Some P-40's came in this afternoon from the 66 th
squadron. It makes us feel a lot better with more protection. We heard
that 1,600 tanks and trucks of the Axis are on their way after us. Today
they were bombed and strafed by our planes.
10th - We had 3 air raids today but no damage done. This morning 27
German planes started for us but were intercepted by our Spitfires. Ten
more tried it again tonight but were chased back. At 3:00 this morning,
a JU-88 flew over but dropped nothing.
11th - Three air alarms today. In the west I watched a dog fight between
our fighters and 30 ME-109's. Four German planes were shot down but
the 66th Squadron lost 2 P-40's and 1 pilot. Six German Stuka dive
bombers were driven back this morning. One of our planes was shot up
this afternoon but the pilot safe.
12th - At 8:15 this morning, 30 German planes attacked us. Four were
shot down. They dropped 5 screaming bombs at us, one landed 75
yards away from me which shook everything. Pieces of steel shot in all
directions. One truck and 5 planes were damaged. Unexploded
butterfly bombs lay everywhere. Three air raids today. One dog fight.
13th - At 9:00 AM we had an air alarm but they were driven back. We
lost 2 pilots and 2 planes. The “A” echelon pulled in last night. When
we told them what we went through, they could hardly believe it. B25's started bombing today. Sand storm starting.
14th - Two air alarms today, no damage to us. Twenty ME-109's were
shot down by our fighters. Capt. Clark got 4 of them. Our bombers
started the shuttle system today. Heavy artillery was heard all night in
the front line. About 104 of our bombers went over the line and 2 were
lost. Received my first package from home today.
15th - Our P-40's took off several times today to raise hell with Jerry.
Page 12

�Strafing and bombing them with 40 pound bombs. Six to a plane.
Tonight some JU-88's were flying around trying to bomb our ammo
dump. Went back to cooking today. Pilots all back safe.
16th - No sleep last night. German planes were flying over all night and
so we spent most of the time in the trench. Every few minutes they
would drop bombs. Cooked by a dim flashlight to avoid giving our
position away. Sand blew all night.
17th - The “A” echelon pulled out tonight. Our pilots went on several
missions today. One of the pilots made a direct hit on a German chow
line and kitchen killing everyone. The Germans are all running wild
retreating towards Tripoli.
18th - Last night we had a picture show on the side of a truck for the
group. About half way through, a British plane flew over which caused
a great panic among about 500 men. We thought it was Jerry. Some
men got hurt. When I stopped running, I was half way back to my tent
so I kept right on going home.
19th - Left this field at 10:30 AM and headed west. A very rough and
dusty ride. About noon a Jerry flew over us up around 20,000 feet and
made a cloud of in the sky.
20th - Arrived at Dufan today with “A” echelon. Quiet field. Bombers
left here to bomb Rome today. Fighters are very busy night and day
pestering the Jerry retreat convoy heading towards Tripli.
23rd - Tripoli fell this morning at 5:00. Great news for us as it was our
goal. Our task is finished.
27th - Norris is chasing a couple of wogs with a truck past my tent. Shot
at them today. One came right up with his donkey but we soon chased
him away. The Germans gave some of them hand grenades to throw at
us. Some spies left here dressed in wog clothes.
28th - Some of the fellows took a truck and went out Gazelle hunting
today and returned with 15 of them. A Gazelle is from the deer family
with single straight horns. They run in herds.
31st - The 65th played a game of ball with the 66th today but lost. I
Page 13

�pitched 4 innings. Hudlow and I went out and fired our rifles this
morning. The men were playing with an English cannon, a 20mm. Two
more Gazelles were shot today.
February, 1943
2nd- The 65th called off 38 numbers for passes to Cairo, Egypt soon. I
will go next week on a transport a distance of 1800 miles. We are all
getting a week’s leave in Cairo. Made some pancakes tonight.
4th - We got paid today at the NCO tent. Received 5 ½ pounds. Last
night I baked until 2:00 this morning and went on duty again this noon.
Crow and I made pumpkin pies and bread. Two big cow pumpkins
came from a wog village.
5th - Caught a bad head cold last night.
6th - I went over to headquarters today and sorted out rations for the 65 th
which came in on a DC plane.
7th - A bad sand storm came up at 10:00 AM and is still blowing
tonight. It blew away out tent and left our bunks and blankets scattered
all over the desert. It was an awful sight to see, lost men being blown
about. Only 10 men found the kitchen to eat at noon.
8th - Sand storm
9th - The passes to Cairo were called off today. We were supposed to
move to Castle Banda but it also canceled. I had pancakes for
breakfast. Only one stove working.
10th - Baked bread and pies tonight. Wind blew hard all night and
today. Crow made some pies today but are all covered with sand. Some
guys thought it was cinnamon on top.
11th - Our move was called off again today. Sent home a money order
of 5 pounds. Only a few showed up to eat today on account of the
storm. Out of sugar and no mess kit water.
12th - Sand blew all night and day. Ten men came to eat out of 130.
Page 14

�Some got lost in the storm. Four tents blew down today. The “A”
echelon didn’t serve dinner so some came and ate with us. Short of
water.
13th - I got up at 4:00 this morning and cooked breakfast. Only a few
came to eat. The first time in 4 days we could wash any pots and pans.
A bowser left today for some more water. Still no sugar and the flour
we got is brown with sand.
14th - Four packages came today. One from folks, Gertie, Shirley, and
Mary Lou Byrges. The sand storm let up today.
15th - Received one package today from Nellie &amp; Bill. Physical
inspection for the cooks.
17th - Hudlow, a cook in my tent, left us today for a hospital. He has
been sick for a week from the sand. We all are pretty well filled up with
sand and bark like dogs. I was up at 4:00 AM today to get breakfast.
19th - We joined the “A” echelon’s mess today, 2 cooks and a baker on
shifts. Movies tonight at headquarters mess tent. The last time they
tried to have a show, we had an awful panic when an air plane flew
over very low. A British plane.
23rd - We left this field today at 8:00 AM and headed towards Tripoli.
Saw a sunken ship in the harbor. Pulled to the side of the road in an
olive orchard and slept under an olive tree about a mile from the sea
and 150 miles from Tripoli.
24th - We were back on the road at 8:00 AM and went thru Tripoli at
11:00 AM and stopped at Zuara near an old German fort made of stone
and cement, full of ammunition. Went on duty at noon. Air field is all
plowed up and rough.
25th - Got up at 4:00 AM and cooked by a flashlight. Planes were flying
over all night. Yesterday, two JU-88's went over us and took pictures,
dropped nothing. Ammunition in the fort set afire and was going off all
day.
26th - We are now operating from Zuara, 25 miles from Tunisia. Two
Page 15

�missions today. The first time we were driven back by 15 ME-109's
Their target were 20mm and 88mm guns. Capt. Clark shot down a ME
this afternoon. A camel almost entered our tent today. Some 1,000
pound bombs went off.
27th - We had 2 missions today. Capt. Sneed and Lt. Kimball were shot
down and killed this afternoon. Sneed was seen as he hit the
Mediterranean Sea in a spin. Almost every plane was shot up some.
Tripoli harbor was bombed last night. “A” echelon joined us tonight.
Capt. Clark shot down two ME-109's.
28th - No missions today. Sick with 101 deg. temperature and bad back.
Went to see Capt. Cook in 66th squadron. Stayed in bed. Cold wind all
night. Hit the slit trench once. Bombs fell all night in the distance
almost putting out our heater.
March, 1943
1st - An air field was strafed and shelled just ahead of us and about 12
Spitfires were forced to land here. One of them cracked up landing
after dark. The enemy has broken our line, so a bunch in our squadron
are moving up in the morning to stop them with many more to follow.
Raid expected tonight.
2nd - Most of the boys were ordered to sleep inside the fort last night. I
stayed in my tent but didn’t sleep. Corn fritters for breakfast. Salmon
patties for dinner.
3rd - The ack-ack guns went off last night several times as a test. We all
got another shot in the arm today. One alert at noon, another enemy
plane flew over very high. I drew 35 more rounds of ammunition
tonight. One mission after dinner, no losses. One enemy plane shot
down.
4th - Two English boys came over last night and we made some coffee.
Hutch and Bess, heavy ack-ack men. Another Jerry reconnaissance
plane went over this noon taking pictures. Cold damp wind all night.
5th - Hudlow came back from the hospital a few days ago. His lungs
and feet still bother. He was in one hospital in Tripoli he said they
Page 16

�bombed every night and sometimes the shrapnel would hit the sides of
the hospital breaking windows.
6th - Six fellows went to Tripoli on a 3 day pass. The place is bombed
every night. Food is very scarce. Our boys get eggs by trading 3
cigarettes for one egg from stray wogs and Italians. Esperson is still
back at the last field.
7th - Today we drew a new tent. Our old one was full of holes and all
ripped. Poole and I put it up way out away from the fort. Our NCO club
is in the fort now. Two German planes came over the kitchen tonight at
supper time. All the men ran for a hole.
8th - Hudlow and I walked down to the Mediterranean this afternoon
and took more pictures. He borrowed Capt. Mitchell’s camera. It was
about a 6 mile walk and we went right thru Zuara. Saw skeletons and
human bones along the beach. One mission today. Picked up sea shells.
9th - I sent $42. 85 home today. The wind blew hard all day. Went after
rations this afternoon. “Uncle Bud,”(rooster mascot), rode on the axle.
Eleven months in the Army today. The advanced echelon were within 7
miles of the enemy and were shelled for 16 hours killing about 20 men
and damaged a few planes.
10th - Moved towards the front again this morning. Went thru Zuara and
40 miles beyond. Arrived here in Tunisia about 5:00 PM. Just as we
pulled on the field, two ME-109's were above us. Ack-ack opened up
on them and they soon left.
11th - The Trans. truck ran on a mine last night which wrecked it but no
one got hurt. Pieces flew in all directions. Capt. D. Mitchell and Lt.
Gatti ran onto a mine today with a jeep injuring both of them, Mitchell
very seriously. The jeep was blown to bits. We had a good mail call
today.
12th - Capt. D. Mitchell died this morning. Both of Lt. Gatti’s ear drums
were pierced. I took care of E. Mitchell’s photo developing outfit while
he and Hudlow went back to pick up an old car. Lots of mail came in
today. Water shortage.
Page 17

�13th - A German reconnaissance plane flew over again at 5:30 tonight.
We had a big mail call today. Hit the slit trench once tonight and found
it filled with almost 15 guys in it. I ran about 100 yards to another one.
Col. Salesbury went up with a P-40 after him but didn’t get a shot.
14th - Esperson and the rest of the boys that were about 100 miles
behind us came here tonight. Heavy artillery heard from the front. Two
Scottish boys were here tonight that we got acquainted with at 174
field. Fixed Epie’s bed on the ground.
15th - One big mission today and we lost 5 pilots and planes. Flares
were dropped last night and a few bombs dropped. American bombers
went over today. The chow line and kitchen of the 79th was strafed
today and killed 20 men. Germans came over at meal time. Sent a
message home.
16th - Flares and bombs were dropped all night long over our field. We
were all up all night and no sleep. I dug my trench a little deeper today.
A very uncomfortable night. At one time there were 14 flares in the
sky. Heavy artillery heard early tonight.
17th - Sand storm. One mission today on some heavy German guns.
Moved out. We had no water for two days, nothing to cook with.
Everything is dirty and greasy. Flares and bombs were coming down
until about 11:00 last night.
18th - The water truck came in tonight. It broke down on the way back.
Sand blew all day. We camouflaged our tents last night because the
moon is brighter every night. I took the old Crosley over and got some
rations. Right hand steering wheel.
19th - Epie and I went on shift again this afternoon. We had raisin pie
that was just brown on top with sand. The wind blew all day. Every
drop of the pie was cleaned up, sand and all. Only one stove that’s any
good out of 5. The rest are plugged up with lead from 100 octane gas.
One blew up today. Made pancake batter tonight.
20th - The “A” echelon moved ahead today, we follow tomorrow.
Bombers and our fighters were after Jerry all day using the shuttle
system. Tonight at 8:30, the heavy artillery started, a continuos rumble.
Page 18

�We are very uncomfortable last night. Lame back all day.
21st - We moved up 28 miles. Started at 9:30 AM and pulled in here at
5:00. We can see the Mareth Line from here. Two German planes flew
over at 5:30 PM. Last night, flares were dropped and a heavy ack-ack
barrage was seen.
22nd - German flares were dropped all night. Some got no sleep. Heavy
gun fire heard all night at the Mareth Line. Two German
reconnaissances planes flew over at 5:00 PM.
23rd - I got up at 2:30 this morning and fried pancakes for breakfast.
Flares dropped all night which kept a lot of fellows up all night. Every
few minutes German planes were heard flying over us. We get our
water from Medinine, Tunisia, 6 miles from the front.
24th - We got a shot in the arm for typhoid today. Our pilots went on
one mission. Our guest for dinner today was Gen. Strickland and Gen.
Guard (sp). They inspected the kitchen. Heavy guns were rumbling
during their inspection.
25th - German planes flew very low over us all night. About 2 a minute
came for 2 hours, but it was so dark, nothing was dropped. Spent most
of the night in a fox hole. Heavy guns pounded all night. Big offensive
at the Mareth Line.
26th - Baltimore’s, Maryland’s, and Spitfires were flying over all night.
Jerry came over early this morning. A very hot wind and sand storm
today. Several missions this afternoon. Advanced crew went to
Medinine to operate this afternoon. Planes came back tonight.
27th - Capt. Reed was shot down in flames yesterday and an English
officer brought him back in a jeep today. He was thrown out of the
plane and came down in his parachute. Everybody suffered from the
awful heat today. Some were sick from it. Three bombs woke me up at
1:00 this morning. Flares a little ways off.
28th - I went on shift with Sgt. Crow today and he got busted to a PFC
for talking too much. One mission at 12:00 noon. An awful sand storm
came up at 3:00 PM and blew down the tent we bake in. Some pies and
Page 19

�the spaghetti were ruined with sand. Very hot today.
29th - We had 4 missions today. Lt. Wymond and Jaquea are missing.
Germans driven out of the Mareth Line at 9:00 this morning. The town
of Gabes, Tunisia, was taken today. We were all decorated with a bar
for the Middle East and Northern Africa campaign tonight.
30th - A German plane tried to spot us at midnight but failed. Flares
were dropped in every direction, a very pretty sight in the clouds. Lt.
Wymond made a beach landing near Gabes to try to rescue Jaquea who
landed in the sea 2 miles out. Lt. Jaquea was dead.
31st - Lt. Wymond came back today but went back again with some
more to get his plane out of the sand. Two missions today. Heavy guns
were heard all day beyond the Mareth Line. Cpl. Hudlow is printing
some pictures for me tonight. The weather was fine today.
April, 1943
1st - A hot sand storm came up tonight and blew down the baker’s tent.
Only a few stayed to eat.
2nd - Three bombs went off at 10:00 last night which caused most of us
to move pretty fast.
3rd - A cool wind blew sand all day. This morning at 4:30 a Jerry flew
over and circled us but dropped nothing. Epie and I were on shift so we
waited until he got out of hearing distance before we lighted any
stoves. Breakfast was out on time.
4th - Today at 2:00 PM we pulled out and went to a field 1 mile south of
Medinine. We pitched our tent in a wadi under an olive tree. The “A”
echelon will follow up tomorrow. Just west of us are the mountains of
the Mareth Line.
5th - Early this morning our planes came in and later the “A” echelon.
P-40's were flying over all day on missions. We hear Gabes fell today.
6th - Today B-25's were going over bombing Jerry. They got him on the
run for the sea. English and American P-40's also hit them heavy.
Page 20

�Stained back again.
7th - S fax, Tunisia, fell today.
8th - I went to the infirmary and they taped my back up and was put on
supervision duty in the kitchen. KP pusher until I get better. Everybody
is getting ate up by sand fleas, which stay in their blankets.
9th - I was inducted into the service just one year ago today. We are one
mile south of Medinine, Tunisia, in sight of the Mareth Line. The 12 th
Bomb Group gave us a scare tonight. They came over us to land after
dark.
11th - The “A” echelon pulled out this morning at 10:30. They are going
beyond S fax, a two day trip.
12th - We pulled out at 10:30 AM. Went thru Medinine and Gabes and
joined the “B” party at about 50 miles south of S fax. Nothing but wild
barley, snakes, and lizards. The headquarter’s stoves blew up today and
burned down the whole kitchen so we fed part of the personnel.
14th - We pulled out at 9:30 and went thru S fax and stopped at a field
near El Djem, Tunisia, about 50 miles from Sousse. We passed
thousands of acres of olive trees. Also, a few peach trees which had
green peaches about the size hen’s eggs on them.
15th - Our pilots flew in today at 1:00 PM. We are in sight of the great
Roman Colosseum, built BC. A two story stone building. It’s wall is
about 3 feet thick. The 50 Franc note has a picture of this building on
it.
16th - Epie and I butchered sheep until 11:00 PM last night for today’s
dinner. Some more fresh meat came in today. We got up at 4:00 this
morning and went on shift. The “A” echelon caught up with us today at
2:00 PM. Eight men were killed in an explosion of an ammo truck.
17th - Today, wogs were found setting land mines around camp, so
some of the fellows killed 15 of them. From now on we try to keep
them away. These mines are some the Germans left for them to set.
Some shots were fired at an enemy plane over us.
Page 21

�18th - This Roman Colosseum that we are near is one that they used to
turn lions in on prisoners of war. The king sat up near the top to look
on and watch the lions kill the men. A JU-88 circled over us this
afternoon. The ack-ack fired a few shots. Tonight, at 5:00, between 80
and 100 German transports started over here from Sicily. Our group,
with others, went out to meet them and shot down 77 of them. The 65th
got 18. One pilot, as he came back, landed and tipped over breaking his
arm. A few bombs were dropped last night.
19th - The “A” echelon was supposed to pull out today but it was called
off. Our pilots broke the world’s record yesterday on their mission at
5:00. The pilot that crashed last night shot 4 Jerry’s down. Three of our
pilots are still missing.
20th - We had our worst air attack last night. The first raid was at 9:30
and lasted a half hour. Six German planes came over from Sicily with
500 lb. bombs, butterfly bombs, and anti-personnel bombs which were
dropped all over. One man was killed and several injured in the 64 th
squadron. A few were injured in the 65th. Some were blown out of their
bunks and a lot of men took off across the field. I stayed in my slit
trench in the wadi, and two flares came down in a parachute just a few
yards from me. Everything was lit up like a Xmas tree. One plane from
the 65th was hit and burned up. Everybody is very upset today. No
sleep last night.
21st - We were bombed twice again last night. Twelve German JU-88's
came over and were dropping 1,000 and 2,000 lb. Bombs which blew
holes 15 feet deep. Also, butterfly and anti-personnel bombs were
dropped. One truck was blown to bits and a plane hit. Tents also got
hits. I took my blankets and went in the field away from everything and
slept on the ground along with most everybody. It rained and this
morning we were all wet. Most of us got about an hour’s sleep. The
“A” echelon is pulling out at 10:00 AM and headed out for or near
Kairouan, the city with the most churches in the world. We also moved
and joined them at 5:00 PM.
22nd - Rain. I was scared out of my wits about 2:00 this morning when
some bombs burst about 15 miles away. The German plane was circling
over us but dropped nothing. Yesterday we saw some American
soldiers from the 1st Army. I dug a deep slit trench tonight. Our first
Page 22

�chance to sleep in 2 days.
23rd - Rain. Some enemy planes tried to find us last night, but nothing
was dropped close. Most everyone today is shaking like a leaf from
being dive bombed so much at night. Some are getting used to it and
some are getting worse. Heavy artillery heard at the front.
24th - Rain. We were up and in our slit trenches most of the night
listening to 6 German planes circling over us, but it was too dark for
them to spot us. Tunis is expected to be taken in 2 days. Heavy artillery
heard in the west. Air raid expected tonight.
25th - A steady rumble of guns heard all morning. At 6:30 AM I went to
Sunrise Service at Group Headquarters. About 5 photographers were
taking pictures of us to be put in the “Yank” magazine. We met some
more American soldiers today and they were asking us how an air raid
felt.
26th - The weather today is very hot and the flies were thick and how
they did bite. A German reconnaissance plane was taking pictures over
us at 1:00 PM. He was up high, no shots were fired. This makes the 4th
day without sugar. Two missions today.
27th - One big mission at 5:00 PM. Heavy artillery barrage all night.
The fire from the guns made great flashes in the sky. Shelling was
heavy and steady all morning. Rations came in tonight. We cut up a
beef to be made into hamburgers tomorrow. Went on duty at noon.
28th - Oatmeal and raisins for breakfast. Fried hamburgers all morning
in hot tent for dinner. Several men are going into Kairouan every day.
The NCO club tent was put up last night. Met some American soldiers,
engineers.
29th - We had the chance to send a Mother’s Day greeting so most of us
did, (a cablegram). We had 4 missions today. Their objective was ships
in the harbor at Tunis.
30th - Cloudy. Our pilots went on several missions today. They hit a
German ship yesterday. I ordered my US Theater of Operations ribbon
from Sgt. Bertry today.
Page 23

�May, 1943
1st - Rain. A quiet day. Pilots had 2 missions today. We got paid in
Francs today at 1:30 PM.
2nd - Two missions. Quiet day.
3rd - I went along on the water run today, 8 miles west of Kairouan.
Stayed in Kairouan about 2 hours. French and wog people. The place
was full of American soldiers. Made out a money order of $27.18
today.
5th - The Major gave us a talk tonight about the present situation.
Bizerte is expected to fall any time. Several missions. One plane after
another was flying over us all night about 5 minutes apart. It kept most
of us awake all night.
6th - Bombers were flying over all night which caused some fear among
some. They turned out to be British Halifax’s. The “Yacht Club Boys”
were supposed to give us a 50 minute program tonight, but was called
off. This is the first thing like this we’ve had so far.
7th - Rain. The “Yacht Club Boys” gave us a program tonight in the
rain. Three new American soldiers joined us today. One of them sleeps
in our tent. They left the States in February but came her from Cairo.
Tunis and Bizerte fell today which was wonderful news for us.
8th - Rain. Bombers were flying over every 5 minutes all night. Heavy
artillery heard and flashes and flares seen. One Jerry plane flew over
here and dropped his bombs a few miles off.
9th - I attended church today at the NCO tent. A new chaplain gave us a
talk on Mother’s Day.
10th - We are going to have movies in the NCO tent tonight, 65th only.
“Cross country romance”.
11th - At 3:30 PM today there was no more bomb line in the Bon
Peninsula. The Axis are separated into 2 pockets in the mountains and
are fighting for their lives. Heavy guns and the Navy were heard
Page 24

�pounding enemy positions all night.
12th - Heavy guns were still at it all night just west of us in the
mountains. Signed pay roll today. Minor and I got up at 4:00 AM and
fried French toast for breakfast. END OF WAR IN AFRICA! Tonight
we celebrated by shooting flares and guns.
13th - Yesterday, 5 Canadian sailors stopped here for dinner. The 79 th
Fighter Group accidently bombed their ship and they were on their way
back to Tunis. Sun helmets were issued today.
14th - Some fellows went into Tunis and picked up several trucks and
cars which were taken from German and Italian prisoners.
15th - We were over seas just 10 months today.
16th - Our squadron started giving 2 day passes to Tunis yesterday. The
65th has rented a building to sleep and eat in.
18th - Rain.
19th - Rain. The “A” echelon moved out today and are going to a field
near Zuara. We will go soon. Passes then will be in Tripoli. It was just
a few weeks ago that we were stationed there.
20th - Weather is hot.
21st - Weather is hot.
22nd - I went to Sousse today and went in swimming in the
Mediterranean Sea. Ships sunk in the harbor and buildings badly
wrecked through the heart of town. This place is 35 miles from
Kairouan.
23rd - Very hot. A swimming truck left again for Sousse.
24th - We pulled out at 10:30 AM and arrived at a place on the beach
about 50 miles west of Zarzis for a rest. Half of the squadron is staying
here at Kairouan to train pilots.
Page 25

�25th - Weather hot. Some of the boys went fishing today but the wogs
won’t take them out where the best fishing is.
26th - We played a game of baseball with the 64th tonight.
June, 1943
8th - The 33rd Fighter Group who are stationed on Cape Bon, 10 miles
from the 65th, were bombed and strafed this morning at 6:00 which
killed 25 men of the ground crew.
9th - I sent a pillow case home today that I bought. We all went on a
hike this morning and swimming this afternoon. Those who could
swim had to swim 50 yards in rough water. I was classified as #2. The
orders are now to drill an hour in the morning and go for a swim in the
afternoon.
10th - We all swam 100 yards today and did other exercises. Picture
show tonight - “The Hard Way”.
11th - I went deep sea fishing today, out about 12 miles. One fish was
caught. Archer, a Red Cross man, a wog, and I had one little sail boat
about 15 feet long. The wog dove for sponges, clams, star fish, etc. for
us. On the way back, the sea got real rough and we all got wet.
14th - Our planes came in today and landed on the beach.
15th - Part of the 65th caught up with us tonight. Only 60 men left at
Cape Bon. Sand storm. Clothing check. Our bags have to be packed by
6:00 PM tomorrow. Nobody knows where we are going.
20th - Yesterday, the rest of “B” echelon pulled in after being broken
down for 4 days near Sousse. We had our teeth checked and issued our
needed supplies. There are 110 of us on the advanced commando raid.
We are taking 2 blankets and a pup tent and food enough for 10 days.
21st - Movies last night.
22nd - Most of “A” echelon moved towards Zarzis, a field 10 miles from
there.
Page 26

�23rd - The rest of us moved today to a field in an olive orchard near
Zarzis. I am in “A” echelon now with the advance party. They say we
will stay here about 10 days.
29th - Rifle inspection, equipment with sun glasses, and everything we
are short of for a party. I took another bath at the sulphur springs. Very
hot today. Movies about every night.
30th - Very hot. We got our orders to leave 7:30 AM on the 2nd of July
for Tripoli and board a boat.
July, 1943
1st - We got paid today, “A” party only. We are leaving here at 7:30
AM for Tripoli tomorrow to board a boat. Nobody knows where. Appel
went to a hospital today.
2nd - We left at 7:30 AM for Tripoli by truck. Arrived at 4:30 PM at
transit camp. Very hot, 136 deg. in the shade.
3rd - We left here and boarded a barge at Tripoli harbor. Six barges in a
convoy. About 300 men to a barge. Slept on wooden seats below deck,
rather tried to.
4th - Arrived at Valletta on the island of Malta at 4:30 PM. Loaded our
baggage on English &amp; Maltese buses and drove about 10 kilo’s and set
up.
5th - Formation at 9:30 AM. Passes started today. At 12:00 midnight,
we had an air alert, siren, etc. This afternoon 3 fellows and I walked to
the sea and went swimming. Stopped at a spring on the way back and
washed the salt off. Island very hilly and rocky.
6th - One air alarm last night, search lights, etc. Walked to St. Paul’s
Bay. Sent laundry out by a native kid. Went on shift this afternoon.
Three sheep to cut up. Made stew.
7th - I had a half day’s pass this afternoon to Valletta and Sliema. Went
across to Gazo in a ferry and back in a small boat. Took some pictures.
Page 27

�8th - McFall and I hitched hiked to Valletta and Rabat and bought a few
souvenirs and took some pictures. We are located near Imgarre (sp), a
small village.
9th - A Maltese boy took me to his home tonight and showed me the
garden, etc. Went into the house and his mother made a cup of tea for
us.
10th - Invasion of Sicily. Spent a few hours in the village after I got off
duty and ate apples and mulberries. Took another bath in the side of the
cliff. A native came to the kitchen with his mule and cart and took me
for a ride.
11th - Two airdromes were taken in Sicily. My name is on the board to
move to Gazo in the morning.
13th - We pulled out today and went to a field near Rabat, Malta. From
here we will operate to Sicily. Our planes came in tonight from Africa.
Received 15 letters, the only ones in 2 weeks.
14th - I walked over to Mosta and found a place to have laundry done.
15th - We all pulled out today and went to a field near Hamrun. Here we
have our kitchen in an old wrecked cement building and us cooks sleep
on the roof.
16th - A year ago today we sailed out of New York. We are operating to
Sicily from this field in Malta.
17th - No operations all day. Rumors of moving.
18th - We left Malta by invasion barges tonight headed for Sicily. We
waited just outside the harbor until 11:00 PM before we took off. Lived
on K rations.
19th - We got up at 6:00 and landed at Pozzallo, Sicily at 9:00 AM and
walked ashore on a floating pier and waited for our trucks. They came
about 4:00 PM and we went to a near by field. Bridge was bombed.
20th - Our pilots had several missions all day, 2 planes cracked up.
Page 28

�Capt. Wymond bailed out, but is reported safe. Last night a great fire
bomb dropped a little ways off.
21st - We had several air alarms last night. German planes flew over us
but dropped nothing. A heavy barrage was seen a little ways off. Also,
a sniper during the night fired a few shots at some of the boys.
22nd - German planes flew over us several times last night and dropped
bombs not too far away. We hit the dirt 3 times from 2:00 AM to 4:30
AM. Several missions all day. Col. Salesbury is missing. Capt.
Wymond is in the hospital. Sgt. Poole was sent back to US on account
of asthma.
23rd - Col. Salesbury came back after being shot down and bailed out.
Two German planes came over at 11:00 AM. Four missions today.
24th - Early this morning the enemy sunk an oil tanker in a harbor near
by. Black smoke rose several thousand feet and made a big cloud. From
1:00 AM to 4:00 AM ack-ack tracers light the sky.
25th - At 4:00 this morning, the guards saw 3 German planes shot down.
The guns woke us up, but we didn’t see them burst.
26th - About an hour before day light this morning, the Germans flew
over and gave us another air raid. I skinned my leg and cut my foot
getting to the slit trench. Shrapnel whistled by but no damage was
done. Cheering of Italians over Mussolini’s assassination.
27th - Very warm. We had another raid early this morning. One German
plane was seen shot down. A steady ack-ack barrage over Syracuse was
going on for two hours.
28th - The “B” echelon came here today from Tripoli. At 11:00 AM, a
German ME-109 tagged our pilots back from the front and circled our
field at about 500 feet and probably took plenty of pictures. We fired at
him but it was too late before he was identified. We have 2 German
planes captured of the same kind.
29th - “B” party pulled out today at 10:00 PM. Last night, another field
was bombed near Syracuse.
Page 29

�30th - At 10:00 last night, we were raided by 9 German JU-88's. About
15 flares and a few bombs were dropped but caused no damage. The
ack-ack didn’t open up on them because it would give away our
position.
31st - Very hot. We pulled out today from southern Sicily and went
towards the center of the island. On the way, we got on the wrong road
and was just 3 miles from the front lines. Heavy artillery was behind us
and were shooting over our heads.
August, 1943
1st - Hot. Two Jerry JU-88's came over at 11:00 AM. We are now 5
miles behind the line. Heavy guns steady all night.
2nd - Hot. Catania shelled all night by British guns and American Navy.
Big flashes seen all night. We are in sight of Mt. Etna, which is beyond
the front line. We lost two planes, one pilot killed, with the other in the
Mediterranean afloat.
3rd - At 4:00 AM, we were awakened by German dive bombers. A
heavy barrage seen over Catania near Mt. Etna.
4th - Hot. A fire started in a wheat field and burned all afternoon. We
finally got it put out before dark. Fighters flew over all night.
5th - We hit the slit trench at 3:30 AM when dive bombers were playing
around upstairs. No flares were dropped.
6th - Hot. We lost 6 planes. Two of them crashed landing and others
shot up. Capt. Wymond came back from the hospital.
7th - One pilot was shot down and killed. German planes circled us all
night. Big flashes seen near Catania and Mt. Etna.
8th - Hot. Our pilots went on strafing and bombing missions. One pilot
killed.
9th - Hot weather. We got a shot in the arm and Small Pox Vaccination.
Page 30

�10th - Last night at 10:00 PM, several German planes circled over us
and dropped most of their bombs on Syracuse. We watched 3 planes
get shot down and burst in flames.
11th - We lost 2 planes. Mt. Etna smoking.
12th - We were attacked last night at 10:00 which lasted an hour. 32
men were killed and 45 wounded near by. Three fires were set and an
ammo dump which lighted the whole country.
13th - Some fellows took off for the hills last night. Nothing happened.
14th - One new pilot was killed when the motor stopped over a
mountain. Our firing squad turned out at the funeral.
15th - Yesterday, “C” echelon pulled in from Africa with “Uncle Bud”.
Eclipse of the moon tonight.
16th - Weather very hot.
17th - Messina taken at 5:00 PM by Americans. No more enemy
existence in Sicily except for a few snipers. Weather very hot.
18th - Doc. Sayouge (sp) brought 2 German busses back from Messina.
Dead people were piled up 4 feet deep.
19th - Rifle inspection. A few Canadian nurses visited the officers.
20th - Sent a cablegram home. Issued mosquito boots which we should
of had a year ago.
22nd - I pitched a game of ball tonight against the officers and we won.
During the game we were chased off the field by a P-40 which over
shot the field and crashed. We all ran over but the pilot was not hurt.
The plane was upside down when it stopped.
My dad’s diary ends here. The preceding pages were taken from two
very small books measuring approximately 2 ½” x 3 ½ inches. I don’t
believe he ended his detailed recordings here, but another diary
probably existed, but was lost. He did record his movements and dates
Page 31

�in another small book where he goes on to air fields in Italy near Bari
in 9/25/43, Foggia in 10/3/43, and near Mt Vesuvius in 3/2/44. He
later moved in 4/5/44 to Bastia, Corsica and on to Alto air base 18
miles south of Bastia where the pilots of the 57 th fighter group (64th,
65th, &amp; 66th fighter squadrons), bombed the Germans in Italy less than
100 miles away. After about 5 months, he and his outfit moved back to
Italy in 9/11/44 to a field near Grosseto. This was his last recorded
place and date that was written in his travel log. He returned to the
States sometime during the summer of 1945 and was discharged from
the service at Ft. Sheridan, IL on August 15th, 1945.

Earl L Dennis
Page 32

�65th Fighter Squadron, Corsica

Page 33

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="44379" order="3">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/c4c61b46945d223618675413adf13bb4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e63f0ec9a8e622babe78c5ab0085a855</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="771935">
                    <text>��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404973">
                <text>RHC-27_Earl_Dennis_Diary_Contents</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404974">
                <text>Diary of Earl Dennis (Outline, transcription and scan)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404975">
                <text>World War, 1939-1945</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="404976">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="404977">
                <text>Army Air Corps</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="404978">
                <text>Military life</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="404979">
                <text>Soldiers</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="404980">
                <text>Diaries</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404981">
                <text>Diary kept by Earl L. Dennis grew up outside of Coopersville, Michigan. He was drafted into the Army in April, 1942, at the age of 29.  He trained at Jefferson Barracks, Missouri, and was then stationed in Groton, Connecticut, where he became a cook for a fighter squadron 65th Fighter Squadron, 57th Fighter Group, 9th Army Air Force. He shipped out from New York and sailed around Africa to Egypt, where his unit supported the British 8th Army from the Second Battle of El Alamein through the conquest of Tunisia. They then went to Malta and supported the invasion of Sicily, and then went on to bases on Sicily.  His diary covers his time in the service through the Sicilian campaign.&#13;
&#13;
Both the scanned version of the diary and a transcription are provided, with an outline acting as a table of contents.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404982">
                <text>Dennis, Earl</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404984">
                <text>1942-1943</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404985">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404986">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404987">
                <text>Veterans History Project Interviews, (RHC-27)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404988">
                <text>World War II</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404989">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="404990">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1029642">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="29686" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="32939">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a1f0d8924cc4ac4b737e6cba28c3dbe0.mp4</src>
        <authentication>aadf31649def986beaca16c9b1f5b0d3</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="32940">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e6d13f4c9fa4eedeba1919ed7f9903a7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6f12354613c0b869974d8ba337e56589</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="561418">
                    <text>ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEW
JERRE DENOBLE
Women in Baseball
Born: June 11, 1923
Resides:
Interviewed by: James Smither PhD, GVSU Veterans History Project, August 8, 2010,
Detroit, MI at the All American Girls Professional Baseball League reunion.
Transcribed by: Joan Raymer, April 7, 2011
Interviewer: “Now Jerre, can you start by telling us a little bit of background on
yourself? To begin with, where and when were you born?”
I was born in 1923, June 11 in Oakland, California, at 131 Chestnut Street. I even
remember the address.
Interviewer: “What did your family do for a living?”
My dad was a truck driver and my mom was a stay at home mom because in those days
women didn’t have jobs, they stayed home and had babies.
Interviewer: “Did your father keep his job during the depression?”
No, there were three express companies, Mayflower, Bekins and my dad’s was Market
Street Express and they lost business, so he had to go to driving--become a teamster and
drive for other companies.
Interviewer: “But he still had work?”
Oh yeah, we were very fortunate in that respect. We didn’t have money, you know, he
would save tires and cut the rubber and sew it to our shoes, so we could get around, you
know. 16:57
Interviewer: “When did you start playing sports?”

1

�I guess since I was able to walk. My daddy—we had two boys, but he made a tomboy
out of me. My brothers were into music and stuff like that, so I started playing ball from
the time I was a tiny thing I guess. I’d say about ten or somewhere around there.
Interviewer: “Whom were you playing with?”
My Daddy--we had a long driveway and boy, he’d pepper that ball in and I’d—he’d say,
“it’s all right, if you’re going to learn to play ball you got to catch them”.
Interviewer: “When you were playing, did you have a regular baseball or a
softball?”
Well, he had a—I guess it was kind of like a softball.
Interviewer: “Did you have a glove?”
Ah huh, I had a five-finger Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth and it had one web. 18:00
Interviewer: “When did you start to play on teams?”
I was about—we had to lie about my age—I was about fourteen and you’re supposed to
be sixteen and the other girls, they were about ten or eleven years older than myself. I
played for a while with just the amateurs, and then the manager, Ollie Fisher from J.D.
Craig’s, he was a world champ three times in a row, and he picked me up and I started
playing with him and from then on we just kept going—industrial leagues and about four
nights a week is what we played, different teams you know. 18:45
Interviewer: “What position did you play?”
Well, in softball I was playing second base, but when I converted over to hardball, the
girls complained about bruises in their hands, they were a little too hard, I ended up in
left field and it didn’t do too much damage except hit the home plate.

2

�Interviewer: “Ok, now when you were playing softball, how far would you travel?
Did you stay in California?
City to city, Visalia, down south, wherever and whoever, yah
Interviewer: “What kind of audiences did you have?”
Fairly good, and of course most of the out of town ones were like country, and you didn’t
have a big attendance because the population was less you know. When we played the
cities like Alameda or San Francisco, we even played against men down at the Oakland
ballpark. 19:50 We had a great pitcher, her name was Willie Turner, a little blonde
bomber from Stockton or some place like that. We had real good pitchers in those days,
Betty Evans from Portland, Oregon.
Interviewer: “Now, were you playing in the leagues during World War II?”
Yeah doing that and working sixteen-hour shift in the Glass House. We were making
those big floats for the Submarines and stuff like that you know. Between playing ball
and working, we didn’t get much rest.
Interviewer: “I wouldn’t think so.”
Three or four hours sleep a day.
Interviewer: “How much were they paying you?”
At the Glass House?
Interviewer: “Did they pay you for the softball?”
Well, I got hired in to play ball, but I wasn’t tall enough to work there. You had to be
five feet ten and weigh over a hundred pounds, which I wasn’t, so they hired me in to
play ball, but I worked my way in. 20:55 Taught myself, watched the girls pack and
how they flip the bottles and when they realized I could do it they built pallets and then

3

�they started lowering the—and hiring people my height, but we were the first Guinea
Pigs, you might call it, because the men had all those jobs and when the war broke out
they took the men out, so they had to replace them with women and women aren’t as tall
as men, so they had to make all these adjustments you know. We had fourteen
departments down there and I worked twelve of the fourteen, all different jobs.
Interviewer: “Now, did you like working there? Did you enjoy working there?”
Yeah, to a point—it was rough, but I liked almost all the jobs, yeah. 21:47 I spent forty
years there, so—I eventually worked up to a supervisor’s job also. They made me a
supervisor over the teamsters and the warehouse men and that was the toughest thing I
ever did in my life. 22:01 You didn’t boss them, you asked them, but I made a lot of
friends and they’re still my friends. In fact, they’re better friends to me than the women.
Interviewer: “When you were playing softball, did you play on military bases or did
you entertain soldiers?”
Yes, I also coached the women’s WAVES in Alameda.
Interviewer: “Did you play for audiences on the bases?”
No, it was mostly practice and I guess they played out of town because I didn’t travel
with them because I had a job, but when they were stationed in for a month or whatever
because they were stationed in Hawaii and all different places, so it was hard to travel
with them.
Interviewer: “When you were playing with your softball teams, did you ever go
outside of California?” 22:59
No, we stayed within the county, Alameda County mostly.
Interviewer: “How did you wind up with the All American?”

4

�Well, I didn’t know a thing about it, but Dottie—Dorothy Stolze, I called her Dottie, I
grew up with her. She lived about three houses up from me and we played softball on the
same team. How she found out, I don’t know, but she approached me one day and said,
“Jerre, they’re going to have tryouts in San Francisco and they’re going to send a scout
out. Let’s go over and tryout for baseball”, and I said, “I don’t know if I want to”. I had
a job and I had a lot of years and built up seniority that I didn’t want to lose, but she said,
“Let’s give it a try, we made out basics”, so I did, I went over with her and there were
like five hundred gals that were there. 24:03 They hit balls to us and grounders and fly
balls over our shoulder and did about everything they could do, but have us stand on our
heads. They didn’t say nothing to us and about two weeks, I guess, later I got a letter
from Max Carey stating to go get a Passport and my birth certificate, and that we would
be receiving a ticket for a flight, to Havana, Cuba. That’s how we found out we were
going to play ball. When we got to Cuba, we went to the training and it was quite a
conversion. Conversion over from softball-- base lengths, pitching and everything
different, but I liked it and we adjusted, but I was sent to Grand Rapids, Michigan. 24:57
Interviewer: “Lets back up a little bit. Tell me a little bit more about spring
training in Cuba. When you got the invitation to go play in the league, did you
agree right away or did you have to think about it?”
No, I just went to it.
Interviewer: “I guess you told me before we started the interview that you weren’t
sure you wanted to go.”
I was hesitant, but once—if fact I didn’t really want to go and my supervisor he told me,
“Jerre”, he said, “We’ll give you a leave of absence, you won’t lose any time on the job,

5

�we’ll stop your time and then when you come back we’ll start it again”, and I said, “I
don’t know”, and he said, “it’s a chance of a lifetime you’ll probably never ever get
again”, so I went. That’s the reason that I went, because they said they wouldn’t give me
my seniority back, which they did in the end. 25:50
Interviewer: “Now, what was it like to play in Cuba?”
It was fun. They called us Amazons because the girls over there are very, very frail, very
feminine and short. Here we are throwing like sixteen-pound bowling balls and they
throw that little tiny thing, and we’re out there playing ball like mad—they just didn’t
believe it. They would follow us around, oh my goodness. I got pictures you should see,
I mean it was like playing a game. They would sit up there in the bleachers and follow us
outside the gate—it was fun. In fact, on April 29th, when we got there, I think it was a
day or two later, we were in the Sevilla Biltmore, which is right across from the
presidents palace, and they, Castro, tried to assassinate that president, Batista, and we
heard these firecrackers going off and everything, and we thought they were celebrating
the fact that Americans were there, that we were there to play ball, and we found out it
was the revolution they were trying to get started and they were trying to get rid of that
president, but it was exciting. That’s all I can say. 27:05
Interviewer: “So you complete that, and then where do you go next?”
Do you mean from Cuba?
Interviewer: “Yes”
We came over here and there’s a lot of difference you know—I don’t know—I don’t
really know what to say.
Interviewer: “Well, did you go to Grand Rapids?”

6

�Yeah, we went to Grand Rapids when we got back for there. I had one heck of a night
my first night, I didn’t miss hardly a thing. We went twelve, I think it was twelve,
innings, and I got a clipping on that, twelve innings, no runs nothing. I don’t remember
how I got on, but anyway, I scored the one and only run and it showed me coming across
the plate with a big old grin across my face. I really don’t remember if I got a hit or
what, but anyhow, I made the run. 28:01 Then I got a phone call the next morning and I
thought I had a hell of a nice game, and I got a phone call the next morning that I had to
report to Peoria. I said, “What did I do wrong?” I had a good night you know, and I still
didn’t know why I was traded. I believe they started with their team in Peoria in 1946, I
believe, and this was 1947, so apparently they needed a left fielder, I don’t know, but I
thought, “Oh my God, what did I do wrong?” I really hurt my feeling, but you learn to
adjust to it. We were housed there by the Berglands and I believe he was the director or
something of the association, and there were four of us that were housed there. I was
pretty nice. 28:57 Being away so many years and I got there this week and I couldn’t
believe there’s only two of my roommates left—they’ve passed on you know. It was
funny, the only way I knew them was through this—it was 1947 since I’d seen them or
heard from them. I wouldn’t even be here if it wasn’t for my little twelve year old niece
on the computer, she saw the movie. She said, “my great aunt used to play ball. I’m
going to see what I can find out”, so she got on that computer, got a hold of Carol and
started talking to Carol and then Carol sent me some literature and I had no idea the
league was still going on. I thought when I hung my spikes up it was over, but it wasn’t,
it’s gone on all these years, but it was great getting back. 29:55 The people are just

7

�fantastic, yeah, we’ve had so much fun here I hate to go back to California, believe me I
do.
Interviewer: “Well, the league is going to California next year.” 30:29
Yeah, that’s—I’m looking forward to that. That’s about eight hours from where I live. I
live up in the bay area and that’s down south, but I’ll get there if the lord’s willing and I
live that long.
Interviewer: “Now, did you only play in the league that one year?”
Yeah, I came back and I was going to teach the WAVES in the industrial league how to
hook slide. I sure did, I hit third, I hit the sack and my ankle went skewed and turned
absolutely, completely around and snapped off at the ankle. The front was in the back
and the back was in the front. I started out with a cast to here and then to the knee and
ended up with a walking cast for months, so that kind of put the end to it. I never thought
any more about and I didn’t know they were still playing or I would have been there, if I
had to crawl. If I’d of known they were playing. 31:16
Interviewer: “So, did you go back to your job in California?”
Oh yeah, I went back and I worked at it for forty years, and then when the state or the
government passed the law that they had to have equal pay for rank—see what happened,
they were picking these boys up out of school, off the street, and bringing them in and we
would teach them how to inspect bottles, how to pack them and they become our crew
leaders in a month and we’re there twenty-eight years and we’re still teaching them and
they’re moving ahead. Anyhow, the government decided that they should start making
women supervisors, so I did make supervisor, but like I say, it was out in the warehouse
with the teamsters and the warehousemen, and boy that is tough. 32:07 Boy, they’re

8

�unionized let me tell you, but yeah, they did call me in and did offer me a job in the plant
which I knew that part of the department back and forward. Back in Florida I worked
twelve out of the fourteen departments, but I decided I had enough, so I quit or took my
retirement, early retirement, at fifty-eight. I was home about five weeks and my mind—
I’ve always worked and I went to the bar one day and Joanne Weston, the Big Bomber,
the roller derby queen, was in the bar. I walked in there and was going to order a drink
and she said, “hey, watch the bar for me, I got to run over to the bank and I’ll be right
back”, and I said, “I don’t know how to tend bar”, and she said, “if they want a drink, just
ask them what goes in it and if they don’t know, they don’t need it” 33:07 That’s how I
started tending bar for thirteen years. Yeah, and then I finally hung it up. Here I am
again.
Interviewer: “How do you think your experience in sports, the time you spent
playing organized ball, softball and baseball, how do you think that affected you or
helped you in your life or help you to do other things?”
Well, it taught me a lot of self-respect mainly, and it gave me a little more confidence in
myself. I was very shy and it kind of gave me a different look on life. I was a little more
forward and able to speak up and speak my mind, which I never did before. People
would say something and I would cry, I was real backward you know. 34:12 I’m not
now, but I was.
Interviewer: “Did you ever think of yourself as any kind of pioneer, whether it was
in sports or in your job?”
Not really, not really, it was just something we had to do.
Interviewer: “Did you ever see the “A league of Their Own” movie?

9

�I sure did and I was just so excited I couldn’t see straight. I went out—in California it
sold out immediately, that film, because we’re ball minded anyhow, and you know I went
from pillar to post and couldn’t find one and apparently someone had passed away and
my niece down south in Sacramento, she went into a thrift store and she found a tape that
hadn’t even been opened and she called me and sent me the tape, so I have the tape.
35:09 I couldn’t find it at all at home, it really sold, and just about everybody in
California has one. Believe it or not, everybody that had it remembered then that I played
and I had so many letters from young kids wanting autographs and things. I won’t send
an autograph unless it’s on a picture because to me a name is nothing unless you have a
face to go with it, so I go down and have that Copymat and have these eight by tens
made. I have a nice picture with me picking up a bat. I have them made and then I
autograph them and give them to them. I just feel that way about it. What’s a name on a
piece of paper if you don’t know who it is? You know yourself, you write an address
down and a name, but I’ve been trying to get cards made. 36:13 I’ve had so many
requests, but the one that broke my heart was this young fella wrote me and said, “I’m
getting married in September and my wife to be saw your movie and went absolutely
crazy. Would you please get a congratulation card for our wedding and autograph it?
We’ll cherish that until the day we die”, and you know I even sent Carol a letter and if
she can get the whole league or whoever would be available to sign one for them. You
know that’s the kind of letters I would get in the mail and it makes you feel so great that
people are acknowledging you. I mean little kids, I’m eight, I’m ten, I’m twelve, and it
really does something to you. 37:17

10

�Interviewer: “Well, it also makes for a good story, so I would just like to thank you
for coming in and telling it to us today.”
This has been a great thrill, really and truly. Just getting back again and being around all
the old friends, and believe it or not it’s like I never left after all these years. The funny
part is though they got a story going around that it’s my great, great grand child and I
haven’t been married and it’s my great, great niece and I have a picture of her and she’s
adorable. She sent for a uniform and she chose white and she had a picture taken in it
and she sent me the uniform, so I called her and I said, “Claissa, my uniform wasn’t
white, it was khaki”, and she said, “well, I like white”, and she did take a beautiful
picture. This kid just turned thirteen and you would swear she was twenty, a beautiful
girl. Everybody in the league—all the kids in the league said that she should be a model
and I said, “she already is sweetheart”, but that’s how I got in was through this little kid
you know. 38:25 We’re trying to bring her in as an associate and get the younger kids
down south into it.

11

�12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="33">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560440">
                  <text>All-American Girls Professional Baseball League Interviews</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560441">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560442">
                  <text>The All-American Girls Professional Baseball League was started by Philip Wrigley, owner of the Chicago Cubs, during World War II to fill the void left by the departure of most of the best male baseball players for military service. Players were recruited from across the country, and the league was successful enough to be able to continue on after the war. The league had teams based in Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana and Michigan, and operated between 1943 and 1954. The 1954 season ended with only the Fort Wayne, South Bend, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, and Rockford teams remaining. The League gave over 600 women athletes the opportunity to play professional baseball. Many of the players went on to successful careers, and the league itself provided an important precedent for later efforts to promote women's sports.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560443">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/484"&gt;All-American Girls Professional Baseball League Collection, (RHC-58)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560444">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560445">
                  <text>Sports for women</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765951">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765952">
                  <text>All-American Girls Professional Baseball League--Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765953">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765954">
                  <text>Baseball players--Minnesota</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765955">
                  <text>Baseball players--Indiana</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765956">
                  <text>Baseball players--Wisconsin</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765957">
                  <text>Baseball players--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765958">
                  <text>Baseball players--Illinois</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765959">
                  <text>Baseball for women--United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560446">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560447">
                  <text>RHC-58</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560448">
                  <text>video/mp4&#13;
application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560449">
                  <text>Moving Image&#13;
Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560450">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="560451">
                  <text>2017-10-02</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="571972">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="571975">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561392">
                <text>RHC-58_JDenoble</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561393">
                <text>Denoble, Jerre (Interview transcript and video), 2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561394">
                <text>Denoble, Jerre</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561395">
                <text>Jerre Denoble was born in Oakland, California in 1923. She learned to play ball from her father, and while she was a teenager she started playing softball in an industrial league.  A friend encouraged her to try out for the AAGPBL, and she joined the league in Cuba for spring training in 1947. She was assigned to Grand Rapids, but after scoring the only run in the season opener, she was sent to Peoria. After playing one season, she went back to her job in California.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561396">
                <text>Smither, James (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561398">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561399">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561400">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561401">
                <text>All-American Girls Professional Baseball League--Personal narratives</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561402">
                <text>Baseball for women--United States</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561403">
                <text>Baseball</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561404">
                <text>Sports for women</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561405">
                <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561406">
                <text>Baseball players--Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561407">
                <text>Baseball players--Illinois</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561408">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561409">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561410">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="561411">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561416">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="561417">
                <text>2010-08-08</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567069">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/484"&gt;All-American Girls Professional Baseball League Collection, (RHC-55)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794544">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796615">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1031724">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="43260" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="47800">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/c812540901457d958429066ea55c0001.pdf</src>
        <authentication>204d0ac6c73dcce9604a9fd49f291e2f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="826669">
                    <text>9 down on you tonight it
Im about that it she were
althcare ~ they were alive
!ffl It she were alive today
were alive today you'd
•ff she were alive today
he were alive today he'd
e were alive today we'd
'I ve today she'd tie you
loday do you think he
!live today they'd know
e today she'd still be

iy he'd have his arm
'd be In this picturtt

1

it she were alive today she'd be going down on you tonight if
he were alive today you could ask him about that if she were
alive today she S1ill couldn't afford healthcare if they were alive
!Oday you'd have such a crush on them if she were alive today
she'd be out walking the dog if he were alive today you'd
probably still be arguing about that if she were alive today
maybe she'd have a gallery by now if he were alive today he'd
never let them get away with that if he were alive today we'd
be going dancing later If she were alive today she'd tie you
up and spank you if he were alive today do you think he
would have gotten sober if they were alive today they'd know
exactly what lo say If she were alive today she'd still be
living with AIDS If he were alive today he'd have his arm
around you If he were alive today he'd be in this picture

fierce pussy

All events are LIB 100
&amp; LIB 201 approved

6PM

THURSDAY
FEBRUARY 15
KIRKHOF
GRAND RIVER
ROOM KC 2250
JOY EPISALLA

CARRIE YAMAOKA

11:30 AM

I WEDS. FEB 14

1208 Calder Art Center
"'" ~"

NANCY BROOKS BRODY

9:00 AM

I THURS. FEB IS

1718 Calder Art Center

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="42">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815473">
                  <text>GVSU Sexuality and Gender Flyers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815474">
                  <text>The Rainbow Resource Center</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="815475">
                  <text>Women and Gender Studies Department</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="815476">
                  <text>Women's Commission</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="815477">
                  <text>Gayle R. Davis Center for Women and Gender Equity</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815478">
                  <text>Digitized posters, flyers, event notices, and other materials relating to gender expression and sexuality at Grand Valley State University, with materials spanning from 1974 to 2019. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815479">
                  <text>1974/2019</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815480">
                  <text>Digitized from collections at the Rainbow Resource Center (formerly the Milton E. Ford LGBT Resource Center), Women and Gender Studies Department, Women's Commission, and  Gayle R. Davis Center for Women and Gender Equity.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815481">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815482">
                  <text>Gender identity</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="815483">
                  <text>Gender expression</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="815484">
                  <text>Sexual orientation</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="815485">
                  <text>Women's studies</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="815486">
                  <text>Queer theory</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815487">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815488">
                  <text>DC-09</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815489">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815490">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="815491">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826649">
                <text>DC-09_SGF_WGS_2018_InvitedSpeaker_fiercepussy.pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826650">
                <text>Department of Visual and Media Arts</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826651">
                <text>2018-02-14/2018-02-15</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826652">
                <text>fierce pussy</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826653">
                <text>Poster with a synopsis of who the artist collective is, including individiual member's bios, and the dates, times, and location of the two events. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826654">
                <text>Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Department</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="826655">
                <text>Kutsche Office of Local History</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1046722">
                <text>The Rainbow Resource Center</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826657">
                <text>Artists and community</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="826658">
                <text>Artistic collaboration</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="826659">
                <text>Lesbian artists</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826660">
                <text>Department of Visual and Media Arts</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="826661">
                <text>Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Department</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="826662">
                <text>Kutsche Office of Local History</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1046723">
                <text>The Rainbow Resource Center</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826665">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826666">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826667">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="826668">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1033280">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="41227" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="45360">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4e4b329fbb88cdfe162621b7d45d8ec8.m4v</src>
        <authentication>2be91ad71ce8c6d4bf6d6b5007ec9596</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="45361">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a510e7fbf8a0ba47913240c5b06a12df.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3637091abc94418ff3f66adefed3c2f0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="784037">
                    <text>Grand Valley State University
Veterans' History Project
Bernard DePrimo
World War II
1 hour 14 minutes 35 seconds
(00:00:10) Early Life
-Born in Jefferson County, Pennsylvania
-Lived there for two years
-Moved to Detroit, Michigan
-Father's mine in Pennsylvania had gone down
-Father had started working in the mines when he was only nine years old
-Born in 1924
-Moved to Detroit in 1926
-Went to Sacred Heart Catholic School for eight years
-Went to Detroit Catholic Central High School for four years
-Graduated in 1942
-Father worked for Cadillac for one year
-Went on to work for the railroad
-Had steady work through the Great Depression
-Had a sister
(00:02:05) Pearl Harbor
-Friend's father was the city editor for the News
-He was at his friend's house listening to a football game on the radio
-Friend's father called up and told them about the attack on Pearl Harbor
-Prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor the war had had little effect on him
(00:03:09) College and Getting Drafted
-In fall 1942 he started studying at the University of Detroit
-Had one semester there
-One month into the second semester he received his draft notice
-Early 1943, most likely February 1943
-Had to report on March 2, 1943 for a draft physical
-Passed that and was given a week of leave
-Reported again on March 9, 1943
-Taken to Fort Custer, Michigan
-Processed, tested, and given uniforms there
-Stayed there for three days
(00:04:28) Training
-Sent to Camp Davis, North Carolina
-Went through basic training there
-Trained with the 430th Anti Aircraft Artillery Battalion
-Everyone training at Camp Davis was going to go into an anti aircraft unit
-Had six weeks of standard basic training
-Exercises and long marches
-Camp Davis was on the east side of the state

�-Went to Fort Fisher, North Carolina for anti aircraft training with anti aircraft guns
-Close to Wilmington
-Spent Easter 1943 in Wilmington
-Emphasis on discipline and following orders
-Sergeants training them came from the northeast and were experienced with anti aircraft
guns
-Got along well with them
-Sergeants and officers training them would be their commanders overseas
-He was in communications
-Communications sergeant had served for twelve years
-He wasn't a strict man
-Didn't see the need for the men to be overly disciplined
-Didn't have any problems with adjusting to the Army
-Had a good mess sergeant and mess crew
-Able to eat civilian food instead of Army food
-On Sunday morning you could order your breakfast however you wanted
it
-There were about 500 men in the 430th AAA Battalion
-He was in C Battery
-Had guns, but also communication personnel
-Communication personnel laid wire so that the gun crews could communicate with each
other
-Also laid wire between the gun crews and headquarters
-He also learned how to drive trucks
-They were a mobile unit so everyone had to learn how to drive
-Meant they could advance with the rest of the ground forces
-Stayed at Camp Davis and Fort Fisher until late August 1943
(00:14:28) Deployment Pt. 1
-Given an eleven day leave before deploying
-Reported to Fort Devens, Massachusetts
-Stayed in old, brick buildings for three weeks
-Building they had been in had been used by the Women's Army Corps
-Meant that they didn't have any urinals
(00:15:12) Downtime during Training
-After the first six weeks of training they were allowed to leave the base
-There wasn't much to do in Wilmington
-Could play golf
-Could go to a town near Fort Bragg
-Given a three day pass and got to visit Washington D.C.
-Had a half day on Saturday and Sundays off
-Able to spend a lot of time on the beach
-Noticed the segregation in the South
-Expected to see it going in
(00:17:32) Deployment Pt. 2
-Planned to ship out of Boston
-Sent to Camp Myles Standish, Massachusetts for one week

�-Boarded a converted British cruise ship on October 22, 1943
-Joined a convoy
-Arrived in Cardiff, Wales
-Had one bad storm on the voyage over
-Storm got bad enough that the stern would rise out of the water
-Didn't do much on the ship
-Most men played cards to pass the time
-A lot of men got seasick
-He didn't
-Didn't have any U-Boat scares
-Took ten, or eleven, days to cross the Atlantic Ocean
(00:20:19) Stationed in England
-Unloaded at Cardiff and then went to Liverpool, England
-Stationed at a small town outside of Liverpool named Huyton
-The first thing they had to do was take the Cosmoline off the anti aircraft guns
-Cosmoline: Protective grease put on the guns to protect them from corrosion
-Stayed in Huyton for about one month
-Moved to RAF Burtonwood
-Set up their guns there
-Stationed there for a while
-In March 1944 they travelled to Somerset
-Stayed there until D-Day (June 6, 1944)
-On the eve of D-Day they drove to Southampton
-Could see planes taking off and heading for Europe
-Knew something big was happening
(00:24:12) Downtime in England
-Able to drive around and explore England
-He would drive the platoon commander out to see where the guns could be set up
-Wasn't difficult to adjust to driving in England because there wasn't much traffic
-Got to visit London while in Somerset
-Only got do that once
-Spent one, or two, nights there
-Visited local pubs and saw the Tube
-Saw evidence of the Blitz
-English were very welcoming of Americans
-Some English soldiers were annoyed by the American presence, but not
hostile
(00:27:17) Crossing to France
-In Southampton for two nights
-Loaded onto a ship and crossed the English Channel
-Arrived on June 8 (or June 9) and anchored off shore for a couple days
-Troops on the ground were wiping out the last of the German resistance
-Luftwaffe still came over at night
-Some of the gun crews manned the ship's guns and fired at the enemy planes
-Unloaded personnel and material over the side of the ship
-Had cranes to unload vehicles

�-Personnel climbed down cargo nets into landing craft
-Landed at Omaha Beach
-On June 11 there was still a lot of debris
-Bodies had been cleared off the beach
(00:29:54) Advancing through France
-Drove up to Colleville-sur-Mer, France
-Spent the first night there
-Had four different positions in three days
-Changed positions sometimes twice a day
-Within the first week some planes went over that they shot at
-Unfortunately one was a British plane
-It had been following a German plane and flew straight through the flak
-Fortunately, the pilot only sustained broken legs
-Only one, or two, German planes would show up at a time
-Remembers during one Sunday Mass being interrupted by German planes
-For the first few weeks they didn't leave their positions
-Saw some French civilians, but not many
-Set up in the countryside in open areas
-On June 21, 1944 they moved into a chateau in Beuzeville-la-Bastille
-Headquarters was set up in the chateau
-Slept near the hedgerows near their gun positions
-Shot a German paratrooper out of the sky that had been separated from his unit
-Received very little news of the war
-Operated a switchboard in headquarters
-Saw a map showing the progress of the Allied advance
-Stayed in Beuzeville from June 21, 1944 to July 22, 1944
-Laying wire to one of the other guns
-Got back to camp at night and heard rifle fire and artillery fire
-Moved to Saint Come du Mont, then Saint Marie du Mont, then Carentan
-On August 2, 1944 they moved through St. Lo
-Kept moving east after the Allied break out in July 1944
-By August 22, 1944 they were just west of Chartres
(00:38:26) Red Ball Express
-The Red Ball Express needed more personnel
-Red Ball Express: A truck convoy system used to supply the Allies in France
-He was sent to join the 110th Field Artillery Battalion
-This was because their trucks were already being used for the Red Ball
Express
-Got to go into Paris as part of the supply operation
-Ran supplies from Normandy to units around Paris
-Did a lot of driving that wasn't part of the Red Ball Express
-Got up to Belgium
-Transporting German prisoners of war
-Traveled in convoys
-Drove with a driving partner
-After one supply run they tried to visit Paris again

�-Ran out of gas though
-Driving one time on a French road
-A farmer and his cow were walking on the side of the road
-Cow stepped and the truck caught part of the cow slamming it into the
truck
-Cow defecated everywhere, but was unharmed
-Found a bugle
-He and his partner would drive through towns while his partner played La
Marseillaise
-Lived on K rations and C rations
-Sometimes subsisted on only coffee for days at a time
-Had to be careful when they made coffee because they used a blowtorch
to heat it
-Did supply runs sporadically through the end of the war
-At the end of the war he helped transport Allied prisoners of war and displaced persons
(00:47:33) Advance into Germany
-For the rest of fall 1944 they were around the Dutch-German border
-He had rejoined the 430th AAA Battalion
-After Thanksgiving 1944 they received orders to move into Germany
-Set up outposts in Germany around Christmas 1944
-Their sector was quiet during the Battle of the Bulge
-Most fighting was happening south of their position
-Aware of the Battle of the Bulge though
-Stationed in a barbershop in Alsdorf, Germany
-Had a radio outpost set up on the roof
-Even had a Christmas tree
-Received orders on December 23, 1944 to move to Stolberg, Germany
-Protecting a 150mm artillery gun
-That gun's crew was firing into the Bulge
-Stayed in Stolberg through January and into early February
(00:50:54) Evidence of the War
-Aachen and Julich had been severely damaged by the war
-Streetlights still worked in Julich, but most of the buildings had been damaged
-Some areas had not been as heavily damaged, or damaged at all
-Could go to movie theatres
-Could meet local girls
-Could attend Mass on Sunday mornings
-Many of the people they encountered were grateful to be liberated, but not openly
friendly
-Wasn't any German aircraft activity while in Stolberg
-Told that if German forces attacked Stolberg they were to hold their position
-40mm anti-aircraft guns would have been effective against infantry and "soft"
vehicles
-Totally ineffective against tanks and other armored vehicles
(00:53:46) German Jet Planes and Rockets
-Saw German jet planes later in the war

�-At one of the gun positions he saw one fly over
-Outside of Maastricht he saw a V-2 rocket come down only 300 yards from his position
-Made a crater that was twenty feet deep
-Some men in his unit had been wounded due to the blast
-Concussion had blown out windows in a nearby building and caused
lacerations
(00:56:12) Casualties
-His battery only had one man killed in action
-Happened while in Beuzeville, France
-An 88mm German shell exploded over where a man was sleeping
-Killed him instantly
-Had some accidents with Thompson submachine guns
(00:57:36) Discipline Issues
-Never had any problems with theft
-Never heard of any black market activity
-Never bought any food, alcohol, or souvenirs from civilians
-Everyone was focused on doing their jobs
(00:58:20) End of the War
-Got up to the Rhine River in early spring 1945
-Crossed on a pontoon bridge
-Didn't see many prisoners of war or displaced persons until the war was basically over
-Displaced persons were shabby looking, but otherwise healthy
-Mostly refugees from Eastern Europe and Germany heading west
-On May 5, 1945 they were in Monchengladbach, Germany
-Had been liberated by the 29th Infantry Division
-Found an intact wine cellar
-Next day transported the 29th Infantry Division south
-Stopped in a small town that had been a summer resort before the war
-Headquarters was set up in one of the resort buildings
-Got to sleep in a building and in a soft bed
-Crossed the Elbe River for a couple hours then received orders to go back
-In Gross Rosenburg from April 22, 1945 to May 10, 1945
-There on May 8, 1945 when Germany surrendered
(01:04:14) Post-War Occupation Duty
-On May 10 drove down to Schlitz
-Lived in houses
-Stayed there for a while
-Some men qualified to go home
-He was reassigned to the 203rd (or 207th) Field Artillery Battalion
-Spent two or three weeks with them
-Could visit the town that they were in
-Saw USO Shows and go to the Red Cross station
-Guarding an ammunition depot
-Relaxing duty
(01:08:15) Coming Home and End of Service
-Moved down to Reims, France

�-Drove to Lyon
-Then took trains to the Mediterranean coast of France
-Boarded a Victory Ship in Marseilles on October 12, 1945
-Spent most of his time in his bunk
-One of his friends was doing KP duty, so he would bring Bernard ice cream
-Had good weather on the voyage back to the United States
-Arrived in Norfolk, Virginia
-Sent to Camp Patrick Henry, Virginia
-Spent a few days there
-Sent up to Fort Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania
-Discharged from there on October 31, 1945
(01:11:01) Life after the War
-Went to Aquinas College in Grand Rapids, Michigan on the GI Bill
-Had a girlfriend that lived in Grand Rapids
-Visited her and then enrolled for the winter 1946 semester at Aquinas
-Went to the University of Notre Dame Graduate School and got a master of arts in
philosophy
-Taught philosophy for the rest of his life
-Taught at a Catholic college in Oklahoma
-Too difficult because there wasn't a very large Catholic population
-Taught at Mercy College in Detroit
-Taught at Aquinas College in Grand Rapids, Michigan
-Taught at Grand Rapids Community College in Grand Rapids, Michigan
-Did that for eighteen years
(01:13:20) Reflections on Service
-Taught him that he didn't want to be an engineer
-Learned to take things slowly and calmly
-Grew up
(01:13:57) Vietnam War
-Didn't see much anti-war activity at the colleges he taught at during the Vietnam War
-Knew young men were fleeing to Canada
-Colleges he taught at weren't hotbeds of anti-war activity

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784015">
                <text>RHC-27_DePrimoB1768V</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784016">
                <text>DePrimo, Bernard (Interview outline and video), 2015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784017">
                <text>2015-05-20</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784018">
                <text>Bernard DePrimo was born in 1924 in Jefferson County, Pennsylvania. He grew up in Detroit, Michigan and in early 1943 he was drafted. In March 1943 he began training at Camp Davis, North Carolina with the 430th Anti Aircraft Artillery Battalion. He received communication training and artillery training at Camp Davis and Fort Fisher until it was time to go overseas. He left the United States on October 22, 1943 bound for England and stayed there with the 430th until June 8, 1944. Over the course of 1944 and into 1945 he and the 430th advanced across France protecting Allied ground forces from the German Luftwaffe. He was also attached to the 110th Field Artillery Battalion driving trucks as part of the Red Ball Express, transporting supplies and later German and Allied prisoners of war and displaced persons. After the war ended on May 8, 1945 he was reassigned to the 203rd (or 207th) Field Artillery Battalion and stayed with them for the rest of his time in Europe. On October 12, 1945 he left Europe and on October 31, 1945 he was discharged from the Army at Fort Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784019">
                <text>DePrimo, Bernard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784020">
                <text>Smither, James (Interviewer) </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784021">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="784022">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="784023">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="784024">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="784025">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="784026">
                <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="784027">
                <text>United States. Army</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784030">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="784031">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784032">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784033">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784034">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784035">
                <text>Grand Valley State University Libraries. Allendale, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="784036">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="796277">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="797956">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="28815" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31384">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4627f039a4ccb193c6abeb6f40f9066f.mp4</src>
        <authentication>bb9b176b56697f04b4d80b223a82f571</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="50557">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/dbc666c41b7c7d0ec7d0bcd68eb2fd97.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b12a01359ad39d89ee1bf6f8f9537674</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="865918">
                    <text>Grand Valley State University
Veterans History Project Interview
Air Force, Air National Guard: pre-Iraq, Iraq
Autumn DeRoo
Length of Interview: 52:36
(00:00)
JS: We’re here today with Autumn DeRoo of Holland, Michigan. The interviewer is James
Smither of the Grand Valley State Veteran’s History project. Autumn, can you start by giving us
a bit of background on yourself. For instance, where and when were you born?
AD: I was born in 1979, in Holland, Michigan. So I grew up in western Michigan.
JS: Okay. And can you say a little bit about your family background.
AD: Well, I have parents who were divorced when I was young, and… ooh, what else. What
would you like me to say?
JS: Well, like your maiden name is Chavez, for instance.
AD: Yes. It is. My dad is Hispanic and my mom is Dutch. So it’s a unique combination. So I
grew up in west Michigan, Holland particularly. Went to West Ottawa High School, graduated
in 1997, from there. I don’t know what else to say.
JS: Well, from that point, did you join the Air Force from there?
AD: I did. I signed up prior to graduating from high school. I knew very early on in high
school that I didn’t want to pursue a college education. Because I didn’t really know how,
because it was not available to me. My parents didn’t go to college. And that weren’t really
familiar with that. It was, you graduate from high school and you go on into the work force.
(01:17)
JS: What kind of student were you in high school?
AD: Not a very good one. (laughs) Not a very good one. I was quite bored a lot of the time. I
wasn’t interested in a lot of the subjects. And I don’t think I was really well prepared at home,
for schooling, whether it was the high school level or the college level. And so I was not real
interested in the studies in high school. So…I didn’t really do much with that.
JS: Okay. And where did you get the idea of joining the military?
AD: Well, I have a family background, of the military. My great uncles, two of them, they had
a full career. My dad was in the military. He served in Vietnam. My grandfather and my great
grandfather were all in the military. I didn’t really think too much about it but my uncle, I spoke
to him more and I got a little bit more information from him and he helped me to make the

�decision on what was best for me. And, you know, as far as the branches and what the service
could offer for me.
(02:31)
JS: So what was appealing to you about the Air Force?
AD: Well, the biggest thing was it was a job and training. I didn’t really know about the
benefits until much later. But that’s exactly what I needed. I didn’t want to work in a factory. I
didn’t want to have my parents life, essentially. Cause that’s what you did at that age. You
would go to high school and sometimes not even finish and then you would go straight into a
factory and you know, do whatever job was available to you. But I knew that wasn’t really how
to make a future for myself. So I really wanted to have some sort of training, some sort of skill.
So I knew that the military, in speaking with my uncle, would be able to offer those skills to me,
that training, and give me a career. So that’s my primary reason for joining and having that
opportunity.
(03:23)
JS: Why the Air Force rather than the Army or the Navy or something like that?
AD: Well, my original thought was to be a Marine. I really wanted to be one of those hard-core
Marines and join more for the patriotic type, kind of my more naïve thought of that. But after
speaking with my uncle, and of course, I was seventeen when I joined, so I needed both parents
signature, and they were really against the Marines and any sort of combat job. So they signed
off on the Air Force, and my uncle, of course, after speaking with him, he was in the Navy, and
he thought that would be a good way to go, so I decided with the Air Force.
JS: Okay. And once you sign up, what’s the induction process and so forth? What happens
next?
(04:19)
AD: Well, you meet with a recruiter and they kind of give you a lot of information. Very
overwhelming. You don’t know, if you go alone or if you don’t go with somebody who knows
the process, you don’t really know what to expect and it’s kind of hard to thumb through all the
information. But, I went with my uncle to the first meeting and I decided it was really for me.
He gave me my options. Also, having my uncle there to really kind of walk me through the
process and know what I can and cannot do, was very helpful. So you see the recruiter and you
cedide whether or not it’s for you and you sign up. I was in the delayed enlistment program,
which was, you sign up in high school and until you graduate and you’re ready to be shipped off.
that’s what they call it, the delayed enlistment program. Then after I graduated I decided, I went
to the military processing center in Lansing, and that’s where you decide, you know, what you
want to do in the military.
(05:29)
AD: My uncle also mentioned that you really need to sign up for a guaranteed job, or they can
throw you in categories and groups and you don’t know. And I really knew at that time in 1997,
that I really wanted to do something in computers, in technology. I was really interested in that

�portion of what was coming. And so I went for that career and I said this is the job that I want,
and I don’t want to go in with just sort of an open field. I want to sign up for that job. So I
signed up for that job. And then all of your dates are kind of around, scheduled around, what
you want to do. So then after that you just kind of wait until you’re shipped off to basic training.
(06:18)
JS: Okay. Now do they do any kind of testing at this stage, you know, to find out what your
aptitudes are, if you’re qualified for particular types of training?
AD: Yes. Actually. I forgot about that. It’s called the ASVAB. Um, it’s a military
standardized testing and they try to place people where they’ll be successful. It is an aptitude
test. They have, well, when I went through, they had four different categories and they would
test your skills, so they can put people where they’d be most successful, most comfortable, and
where they would grow and work out. And, so, there’s a test that you do take, prior to going to
the military processing center in Lansing to decide where your career is going to go.
(07:05)
JS: Okay. So when you’re meeting with them, they already have the tests results so they can be
looking at that, or does that come in later?
AD: Um, now I think it’s all automated. So, yeah, I think you do get it. When I took it, it was
paper and pencil and [purple?] sheets. So I got a raw score the next day, but then my score
would come later on. But, I’m almost certain that it’s all computerized now.
JS: Right. Well, basically, you did well enough on that, despite the spotty school career prior to
going into that, that you could go where you wanted to go.
AD: Yes. Yes, I was able to meet the criteria for the career choice that I took. So…
JS: And where then did they send you for basic training?
(07:49)
AD: I was in San Antonio, at Lackland Air Force Base. That is where the Air Force basic
training is located at.
JS: And what did that consist of?
AD: Um, looking back, it all just seems kind of silly. Not the training. The training was
intense. It was very serious and helpful and really was an incredible experience looking back.
At the time, it wasn’t necessarily the most fun.
JS: So what do they have you do?
AD: Well, it’s a lot less intensive than the other branches, from what I’ve heard. You have your
physical training. You have your mental training. You have a lot of different classes, as far as
military history and, you know, kind of going over what the Air Force is about. You learn a lot

�of the different regulations and policies and they just are trying to educate you, to make you
understand about the military. And how we work and how we function. And they kind of go on
with those kinds of classroom work. So you have classroom work, you have the physical work.
You have the drilling. Which consists of the marching and those types of formations and
whatnot. Then, goodness, I’m trying to remember, it seems so far back.
(09:16)
AD: Just a bunch of different trainings. Ultimately, they’re really trying to reshape you into a
military minded person. They’re not trying to change you. They’re not trying to make you
somebody different. They’re just trying to shift your values and how you live your life. And
what’s important for the military.
JS: Okay. How much emphasis was there on discipline and following orders?
AD: Lots of discipline and following orders. So there was a heavy emphasis. I mean,
ultimately that’s really what the military is about. The discipline is throughout your career. It’ll
be throughout your life, if that’s something you take to heart. Um, following orders is very
important. It’s not like what you see in the movies. That’s very extreme. It’s just very
important, I mean, especially during intense times. And I’ve never been in a war situation, but I
can imagine that those orders need to be followed without question. And that’s certainly
something that they try to emphasize, because in times of war and intense moments, you would
really have to, you can’t think about it and you can’t question it, you just have to do and trust that
your officers and your non-commissioned officers, they really know what they’re talking about.
(10:39)
JS: Were you surprised by any of the stuff they had you do, or were there things that you didn’t
expect, or was it pretty much what you thought it would be going in?
AD: I can’t, ummm… as far as basic training, there was the cleaning. I mean, you had your
details and whatnot and they were very focused on cleaning and laundry, and…you had certain
people who did laundry, and certain people who cleaned the barracks and certain people who
cleaned the latrines, certain people who did certain things, and so that was really interesting to
me. But it builds a sense of that’s your job, you need to hold responsibility for it, not only to you
and the person you’re working with, but to the entire group. Because if you are not successful,
you know, sweeping the floor, it seems so irrelevant, but if you’re not successful with that, then
the entire group is not successful. And so, even though if you’re not actually doing that, it may
sound silly, but it really is a good exercise to bring a bunch of people who don’t know each other
together and we need to work together as a team and really, um, you know, make this happen.
So it was kind of a training exercise, which was, it was quite interesting.
(12:00)
JS: Okay. What was the most difficult or challenging of that first stage of training?
AD: The mental aspect. You know, at seventeen, it wasn’t my first time away from home, but
you know, you kind of get used to your life. To your, I don’t want to say freedoms, but you’re
used to just coming and going as you please. It really gets mentally draining, as far as you know,

�trying to go down that route. But at the end of training, you’re really, you’re used to it. And it’s
something that is very important and it becomes a part of you, so the mental part and trying to
get through the training, and worried about any sort of failure, I think that was my toughest
obstacle in that part of the training.
JS: So were you in good physical condition when you went in? So you could handle the
exercise and physical training and that kind of thing?
(12:58)
AD: Yeah, I wasn’t in the best. I didn’t run, like four miles a day, or anything. But I wasn’t
overweight or had heart problems or asthma or any of those types of problems that would
become an obstacle to doing the physical part. I was just average. Average high school kid,
McDonald’s and life, and non-exercise life, so…
JS: All right. Now what kind of people were you training alongside of at that point? You know,
where were they from, what kind of backgrounds did they have?
AD: All over. I mean, I remember there was people of all ages. Seventeen year olds. There
were people in their twenties and thirties. I want to say, oh, not at that point, we didn’t have the
older. There was this one woman I knew, she was much older. Um, but, we had people who
were in the civil air patrol. People who didn’t graduate high school, people who did college for a
little while. It was, it’s just such an array of different people and different backgrounds, people
in the training. There’s men, women, I mean, in my whole bunk or dorm or whatever it’s called,
I can’t even remember, you know, it’s part of the barracks, the women’s barracks. I mean, it was
full. We had sixty women just in my flight alone, so it wasn’t very limited on women, and I
mean, there’s all sort of different people from different backgrounds.
(14:29)
JS: Okay. Now when you finish the basic training, what do you do next?
AD: You go on to your technical training. They will send you to, um, whatever base your
technical training is. It’s all over the United States, so um, that’s pretty much what you do next.
You just go to directly into your career field training.
JS: Okay. So where do they send you?
(14:55)
AD: Biloxi, Mississippi. Keesler Air Force Base. That is where the Computer Communications
Operation is housed out of. That’s my career field and so that’s where home is for training.
JS: And what kind of a place was it physically? In Lackland, we have a really big extensive
base, so what was Keesler like?
AD: It was much smaller than Lackland. Of course, Lackland is big. It’s over across a couple
of roads, and you know, just ginormous. But Keesler is smaller. It’s right on the coast. Right

�across the street is the Gulf of Mexico, so it’s smaller. But it’s still bigger in comparison to some
of the bases that I’ve worked at, so it’s probably average.
(15:45)
JS: Okay. How many people were you training with? Did you have kind of a class or a cadre
that you were with, or how did that work?
AD: Yes, you do have, you have classes starting each week. And you have, I want to say an
average sized class. Maybe fifteen. Twenty people, roughly. Um, but you would start out, you
had one class starting out one week and the following week you had another class. And if you
failed, then you would jump back into the other class. But, pretty much everyone stayed with
their class and then at the end, you would have your graduation with your particular class that
you were in.
JS: Okay. So what actual skills or training were you picking up at this point?
(16:29)
AD: For mine, it was the computer communication skills. So we were doing a lot of work,
hardware, software, networking, um, what else were we doing. We did a lot of the fundamentals
and principles of technology, of computers in general. And the infrastructures of networks. We
did a lot of that type of work. They cram it all into three months, so you were working quite
long and a lot of homework and a lot of studying.
JS: Now did you get any time off? Like did you go to the beach, or anything like that?
AD: Sort of. Right after basic training, after six weeks of this hard drilling and away from
everything, no phone calls, no sort of luxuries, you go into your technical training. So to prevent
people from going completely wild, you graduate into steps into your luxuries. So, the first two
weeks, you’re still wearing your full uniform. You have a certain curfew. You can’t do certain
things. And then the next two weeks, you might be able to take your uniform off in the vening
and wear civilian clothes.
(17:49)
AD: Um, but you still have curfews and stuff. So you kind of graduate into the different steps of
what your luxuries are. Um, and then ultimately by the last step, you can go off base, you have
extended curfews, you can do certain things. That’s the ultimate goal. But the reason they do
that is so that you can just gradually step out of the hardcore basic training drilling and
mentalities. So you kind of ease out of it.
JS: What was the gender balance in your class? Was it about even, men and women, or more of
one or the other?
AD: No, it was more men. My career field definitely has a lot more men. I don’t know about
today, but there was definitely a lot more men than women. I think there was myself and I want
to say, two or three other women, in my class.

�(18:51)
JS: Okay. I guess part of it is we think of it as the computer science side of things, you have a
lot more men, if you think communications, you might have more women in there, or something
like that. But the group you were in, at that point, it was still largely male. Were there any
issues with that dynamic or were you all just kind of in this together so it didn’t matter?
AD: Well, we were all in it together, so I don’t really think that there was any sort of imbalance
there. I mean, there wasn’t any “I’m doing this better.” There was a lot of, at this stage, there
was a lot of we’re all working together, we all have the same goal, we all want to succeed and
learn, so we’d ask each other questions. We very much worked as a team. But we also had retrainees in there, which ae people who are in the military and are changing their career field.
And so we had a lot of some older presence in there. And some actual experience presence.
Um, so that was good to know and have that network and support. And they were just really
helpful in military knowledge in general as well as with the classroom.
(20:03)
JS: So that’s about a three month span, you said, that you’re there?
AD: Yes. My class was a three month span. You have classes depending on the career that can
be six weeks all the way to a year, two years, when you get into the extensive, like when you get
into linguists. But my particular one was sixteen weeks.
JS: And once you complete that, what comes next?
AD: Well, towards the end of your training, you will get your first assignment. So then you
prepare, you start preparing to go to that assignment. And so, it can be anywhere. You, they
give you a dream sheet, is what they call it. Because ultimately, that’s what it is. It’s this is
where I’d like to go. But they can pretty much send you anywhere. If you really don’t want to
go overseas, I think that you can request that. Especially with your first assignment. I didn’t get
an overseas assignment but I can’t remember really exactly how that works. But I ended up
going back to San Antonio, at Brooks Air Force Base. And that was my first assignment.
(21:10)
JS: Okay. And what kind of work were you doing there?
AD: Um, a bunch of different work. We had, I worked for the small computer center, which is
basically a fixing of the computers. They really you know, they do the hardware and the
software and they resolve any sort of issues there. I also worked for the inventory. We kept all
of the base inventory. So we had to be responsible, be accountable for all the equipment on base.
So I worked for them as well. Um, and I worked for the Help Desk a few times, just kind of
filling in and whatnot. But those were my primary jobs, at Brooks.
JS: All right. Again, what was sort of the routine like there?
(22:00)

�AD: Well, when you first come in as an Airman Basic, which I was, you have to live in dorms
and you have to live on base until a certain time. So I lived in a dorm on base. Um, and so that
was kind of incorporated into the routine. And then, you know, it was just very much a Monday
through Friday, 8-5 job. Just go in and do work. That base in particular, didn’t have the odd
shifts and hours. It was a very day job. Because they had a lot of civilians who worked there.
Um, they did, what are those things called? They’re those machines that, um, gosh, I can’t
remember. They’re those machines that they put you in it…
JS: Are they flight simulators?
AD: Well, they did have flight simulators, but they did some sort of, I can’t really remember.
Like if you have some sort of injury and they put you into these.
JS: Oh, MRI’s?
(23:04)
AD: No, there more of…I can’t remember.
JS: Okay.
AD: Sorry, I just can’t but it was a really interesting aspect of that base, but I didn’t work there,
so it wasn’t really that important to me. I can’t rembmer what they were called. But they did
have flight simulators.
JS: What was, as far as you could tell, what was the main function of the base? What did they
do there as opposed to Lackland or someplace else?
AD: Um, pretty much the unit, that unit I was telling you about, that was their main function.
They were really losing the functionality of the base. And it’s now a city base. I spoke to
somebody the other day, and they now have a Best Buy on it, and it’s no longer a guarded air
force base. I mean, like, they have shopping centers and whatnot on it. So it’s not really, I
mean, it was being phased out, so there wasn’t a real strong mission there.
(24:03)
JS: I guess in the late ‘90s, generally, the military was doing a lot of downsizing, and so forth.
Was that really noticeable to you, from your perspective at the time? Were you seeing that
things were changing or shifting or is that something you figure out later?
AD: I think it’s stuff that you figure out later. At that time, from what I understood, before I got
there, they really weren’t getting a lot of new people. And once I got there, we were getting
people all the time. So, I didn’t really notice it then. But then looking back at it now, it kind of
made sense because ultimately the base closed, as kind of an air force base and is now a city
base, whatever that may mean.
(24:48)
JS: All right. Now how long did you spend in that assignment?

�AD: I want to say I was there from ’97 to ’99, so a couple of years. A little over a couple of
years.
JS: All right. And do they just kind of routinely move people around or do you request changes,
or, what’s your next step?
AD: I actually requested the next change. I was ready for a different job and to move on. They
do occasionally have assignments that come out. You know, looking for someone of this
qualification to go here. Um, or, when it’s time for assignments, you can be thrown in the mix
and you’ll get assigned wherever. So this assignment came out to go to Colorado Springs,
Colorado. And so I applied for it and I actually was assigned to, for that assignment. That’s
where I ended up next.
(25:45)
JS: Okay. And then what kind of job did you have there?
AD: Well, I worked for Cheyenne Mountain Air Base. Um, it’s the mountain complex that you
see on Stargate SG-1. (laughs) So everyone is, is that where you were working? Is that the real
one? It’s not the real picture, I don’t think. Um, but that was really interesting. The complex is
inside the mountain. It’s on these huge springs. I mean, the building is on these huge springs.
You have a couple of blast doors that you have to go through. And you have to take the bus
inside the mountain, or you can walk, but it’s a long walk. So I was doing pretty much the same
thing. I worked for US Base Command and NORAD. I worked on the help desk. For a few
years. And I’ve done odds and ends. I’ve done different jobs here and there. Network
administrator, NT administrator, just different jobs.
(26:45)
JS: All right. And what was the atmosphere like at this place, as opposed to the other bases you
were at? Did it have a different feel to it because of the nature of duty there, or…
AD: It did. I think that’s a good observation. I think, it maybe did feel a little more important.
I don’t want to say that any mission is not important, because they all are, um, but being
nineteen, at that time, it’s nice to feel like you have more of an importance that just doing an 8-5
job and you know, fixing computers. While that seems…that it still important, but at that time, I
felt like this job was more important because of the nature of the US Base Command and
NORAD, that’s who I was working for,
(27:30)
JS: And how long did you spend there?
AD: Three years.
JS: And were you still, now were you able to live off the base, or were you still on it, or what
were you doing?

�AD: I started living on the base. I was still a lower ranking. But at that time, I was at Colorado,
I was eligible to move off base, and so then, yes, I did, transition to living on my own.
JS: Now that’s also the area where the Air Force Academy is. Was there any connection, or
back and forth, between the base and the academy, or…
AD: I didn’t have any work connection with the Air Force Academy. Um, it’s a beautiful,
beautiful base. The hospital, our military hospital is up there, so I have gone up there. But no
work relation. Um, Cheyenne Mountain and Peterson Air Force Base, those two are very
connected and I actually worked on both. Of Peterson and Cheyenne Mountain. And then
there’s another one, Schriever Air Force Base, I’m not sure whether it’s still there. But so it was
a large military community.
(28:34)
JS: Now, were you working at Cheyenne Mountain at the time of 9-11?
AD: I was. I was. Very…um, everyone tells me it’s an interesting story, but it was my
everyday life. So, um, I was thinking about that this morning. If that would come up. But,
yeah, the morning of, you know, they talk about knowing where and what you were doing,
Kennedy, Pearl Harbor, stuff like that. I mean, you don’t know that until you experience it, and
you know, I can tell you exactly where I was sitting, exactly what I was eating. I had just come
on for duty. Um, and next thing you know, two people came running down the stairs and flipped
on the news, cause they had access to a tv, on the third floor, and so, all of this unveiled and
happened and then we just pretty much had to sit and wait, wait for orders and wait to see what
was going to happen. Um, they shut down the Mountain. Closed the blast doors. It was just an
intense time. Because I worked for, I worked in the NORAD, where they watched the air and
space and so we really had to make sure that everything was functioning properly. We really had
to be on high alert, because of everything that was going on. Everything with the airplanes, and
the whole air traffic, and so that was what the monitor, you know, of. And so that was a really
interesting and tense time.
(30:11)
JS: Cause at that point, they basically emptied the skies. All aircraft had to land and get
everybody down and so forth, and so you’d in part, be monitoring that. Now basically, you were
just providing service. You weren’t necessarily watching the radar or anything like that, at that
point.
AD: No. No. We provided the service. I worked at the Help Desk at that time. And so if
anything were to go down, or if anything was needed, that’s kind of what our function was. And
we had to really be on the ball, especially with the communication factor. Because we had to
make sure that our communications, obviously they’re secure. But we had, also we had to make
sure that the communications lines remained opened and that they could have that
communication outside to the necessary parties. Um, so we had to really make sure that
everything was up and running and smoothly.
JS: How long did you stay locked down?

�(31:13)
AD: Oooh, I think, this was about 7. Our shift was 7 to 3. I don’t remember getting out of there
at 3. It was a while afterward. Um, they sent some people home. Some people were required to
stay due to the nature of their job, but they did swap out the shifts because they didn’t know what
was going to happen. I did stay past the shift, and they had to call in the next shift, but I can’t
exactly remember how long, but it was quite some time.
JS: And then did you do things at all differently after that, or were there other kinds of things
that you had to do following up on all of this, or did life go back to normal pretty quickly?
(32:05)
AD: No. Life took a very long time to get back, and not to normal. It hasn’t been normal since
then on a military base. Ultimately, all of the bases were closed down for days, I actually lived
on base at that time, and I actually couldn’t get back on base, so that was kind of difficult. I had
to find a place to crash for the night, you know, because I couldn’t get back home. So, you
know, I mean, just really secure. Um, really intense and it stayed that way for a very long time.
Our operations within work were very high paced, intense as well, and because of the somber
mood of everybody, that was just something that we just really focused on work, and we just
really made it happen, because you don’t, I mean, it was a tragic time. And that’s what you
focus on. You want to make it right. And you want everything to work. And you don’t want
anything to fail because you don’t want anything like this to happen again. So that was kind of
the mood and the tone that was set.
(33:20)
JS: All right. Now, not too long after that, we launched the invasion into Afghanistan, all that
kind of thing. Was that anything that had any kind of connection to what you were doing at
Cheyenne Mountain? Or was that other people’s business and you just did your stuff?
AD: That was pretty much other people’s, you know, missions and whatnot. And honestly, I
didn’t really know a lot about what was happening in the Middle East until I was on my next
base, in Europe. So until we actually launched the war, or the military operation on Iraq, so…I
wasn’t really aware of what was going on because our missions were not directly related to that.
JS: Okay. Now when do you switch to your next assignment, when do you move out?
(34:11)
AD: In 2002, is when I ended up going to my next assignment. Which was Lisbon, Portugal. It
was a NATO assignment. So it was not necessarily an American geared mission. It was an
overall NATO mission.
JS: Well, can you talk a little about what was going on there, in Lisbon, what you were doing
there?
AD: Um, it was actually kind of the same as at Cheyenne Mountain. I was kind of working in a
support department. But I wasn’t actually at a NATO base, I was at a Portuguese Air Base, that

�had a NATO contingent. And so there were only four Americans there. Three officers and
myself, an enlisted person. So there were four of us working. I did kind of the computer, techy
stuff and they did their positions. And I worked very closely with the Portuguese military, that’s
pretty much the majority who was there. I had one Spanish military person and one Italian
military person, who I was working with too, so that was quite interesting.
(35:24)
JS: How was working in that situation different from working in an American base?
AD: Well, um, that was, well…that was really an interesting time. The only women that were in
this contingent, um, they were secretaries. There were two. They were secretaries and very
much treated as such. So that was kind of interesting, trying to be taken serious and, um, being
able to do my job, because, you know, it’s a different culture. So that was very interesting. And
just the military, how they’re just relaxed with rules and regulations. I mean, we worked in a
bunker, underground. But they all smoked. You can all smoke, as so that was certainly
different. Coffee breaks were all the time, which I didn’t mind so much. They had good coffee,
or [beaka], as they would it. And it’s certainly just a different mentality. It’s very relaxed. I
mean, they’re very serious about their job and they take pride in their job. But it isn’t as
intense…I don’t know, it’s more of a relaxed feel. And people are like, we have a mission, we
have a job, but it’s also more of a peace mission, so it’s not intense.
(36:58)
JS: Now, what kind of activities were they serving or supporting out of that base? Were they
connected to peace-keeping efforts in south eastern Europe, like that? Or could you not really
tell what they were doing?
AD: Well, a lot of it was hard, because even though the NATO language was English, um, I
want to say 97 to 98 percent of the people who worked there were all Portuguese. So a lot of the
conversations and whatnot took place in Portuguese. And um, so I really didn’t understand the
mission fully. I knew that it was kind of like a NORAD mission, I mean you can see they had
their monitors where they would monitor the air, but I want to say it was more that they were
monitoring the military aircraft versus any sort of civilian aircraft. So, and they were connected
to all of the other NATO combined operations center. And we were all kind of connected that
way. But as for the actual goal and mission, it’s kind of fuzzy to me just because they all spoke
Portuguese.
(38:10)
JS: Now did you live on the base or someplace else?
AD: Off the base. All of the Americans over there, we didn’t have any sort of on-base housing.
There is one other NATO facility which is actually considered the NATO base, in that area, that
we kind of headquartered out of, in Oeiras. And that was kind of where our stuff was. But we
all lived out in the communities.
JS: So did you have an apartment some place?

�AD: Yes. I had a condo in one of the small villages. Um, where a lot of Americans lived and
whatnot. It was very accessible to trains and all of the tourist area, which was nice, cause they
speak English. And it was located close to the beach, and really a lot of the nice area, so that was
really nice, just to experience the culture in that way.
(39:04)
JS: Okay, and now, you’re working with a lot of European men and so forth, and you mentioned
that they weren’t quite sure what to do with female military personnel, did that ever become a
problem? Did you face any kind of harassment, or was it not at that level?
AD: It wasn’t at that level. It wasn’t at any sort of harassment level. It was more of an irritation
level and just being strong minded, I guess. I’ll put it nicely. They would, I would kind of…I
wouldn’t necessarily be mean, but I would be verbally strong and hold my ground, so you know,
let them know that I am here and I can do the job and whatnot. So ultimately, after a few
months, you know, I don’t think from my personal perspective that they came to trust that, you
know, but at least they didn’t just make me sit at a computer, and you know, try to make me be
their secretary.
(40:22)
JS: Okay. So they would have wanted you to do things that weren’t part of your job description
as far as little jobs for them, or…
AD: Um, not necessarily for them. I think they just needed to employ me, but they didn’t want
to employ me how I was supposed to be used. So I think it’s a big culture, and women in the
military for them is recent. So I didn’t, at first, I took it a little personal, but then after learning
more about the culture and stuff, I kind of figured out how I kind of needed to bypass that and I
didn’t entirely do that. But, you know, I was able to do what was needed of me. And it worked.
(41:16)
JS: Okay. And how long did you spend there?
AD: Two years.
JS: Now, you’re there then when the invasion of Iraq starts, and all of that kind of thing. How
did that affect what went on at the base when you were there, what you were doing?
AD: It didn’t affect our mission. It did affect the person… I don’t want to say personalities. It
did affect the mood there. You know, a lot of people that I worked with, they didn’t agree with
Americans. They certainly did not like George Bush. And they made it, they were very vocal
about it. They made that clear. Um, the best way I found was just to stay out of it. Not to really
voice any opinion or side, or what I thought, or just let them talk about it, you know, let them at
least talk to an American so they feel like they’ve been heard. So let them talk about it and that’s
fine. Everyone has the right to their opinion. I mean, Americans have their same beliefs, which
is what these people were saying. I mean, fine. You can have your opinion and whatnot and I’m
not going to say that you’re wrong or unjustified. I’ll let you talk to make yourself feel better.
So that was very interesting. I heard a lot of, you know, America this. But a lot of people were

�really, they could see the bigger picture. So you had both sides. So it was kind of nice to see
that you had both sides, of people viewing the bigger picture and um, really supporting and
understanding of the United States. But then you also had people who were concerned, just like
we all are. So that was kind of interesting.
(43:05)
JS: All right. Did they transfer people out, or did any of the Americans who were working
during that period go somewhere else or did they get re-assigned, or were they in a different
enough kind of assignment that the stuff didn’t really affect them?
AD: We did have one. He was sent over to a NATO position in Turkey. I don’t know exactly
what he was doing over there. I was actually supposed to go with him, but that kind of got called
off or something. I don’t know really what happened with that, but the both of us were supposed
to go over to Turkey and do some stuff over there, but he was over there, I wanna say, for only a
month. And that was the only impact that my little contingent had. The rest of us we were not
impacted at all.
(43:59)
JS: Right. Okay. Now, as you’re moving through these different positions, are you getting
promotions or extra training, or things like that at this time? Cause you come out as a sergeant
eventually. So where does that fit into things? Do you get additional training or courses along
the way, or new certifications, or what happens?
AD: Yes. You are constantly in a state of training. All the time. Um, you have, your first few
ranks as airmen as pretty much automatic with time in service. But you have on the job training.
After your initial technical training, you do course work by book. So you’re doing career
development courses is what they are called.
(44:45)
AD: And then you have different training opportunities depending on your job. You can be sent
on temporary duty, TDY, to a base for training, you can get it in house, you’re constantly, it’s a
constant state of training and learning. Which is very beneficial. So that part is alays going to be
happening, but as far as the promotion part, um, the first few ranks you are just automatically
promoted. But then once you start getting to the sergeant ranks, E5, E6, all of those, you have to
start testing. And so I was tested for Staff Sergeant my first time and I actually made it then. So
I was a Staff Sergeant very early on. Five years I think. So that was a benefit for me. And then
my last rank, an E6, which was a technical sergeant, I earned when I was in the Air National
Guard.
(45:45)
JS: Okay, so now after you finish the stint in Portugal, what did you do at that point?
AD: That’s when I decided to leave the military. Um, I still had a contract with the military but
they had, at this point, it’s called fore-shaping. They’re really trying to minimize the force, I
don’t know if it’s due to budget reasons or what. It seemed silly at the time, that they were doing
this because of the war that was going on. But you know, the Air Force doesn’t have a lot of

�mobility units that have direct relation to the war. A lot of communications and pilots and things
like that, so I was able to get out, on the fore-shaping, and I decided to leave. And then I joined
the Air National Guard, after.
(46:37)
JS: What motivated the decision to leave?
AD: Well, I was bouncing around and moving around so much, I was just ready to be in one
place and have a consistent job. I was ready really for consistency in my life. How old was I?
Gosh, I don’t even know. You know, I was in my mid-twenties and I was just really ready, you
know to have some sort of solid life. And so I decided it was probably in my best interest to
leave. Um, and so that was the choice that I made. And I decided to come back to my home
state of Michigan and see what opportunities were out here for me.
(47:21)
JS: All right. Now what were, what were your responsibilities with the Air National Guard?
You just had to be on call or available at that point, or what did you do?
AD: One weekend a month. Pretty much. And there were some exercises that they had,
periodically. I was pretty much in the Air National Guard from 2004 ‘til last spring. So it was
pretty much one weekend a month. I had time off and had times that I would go out to the base
and work sporadically, but nothing with a significant chunk of time.
JS: And what base would you go to?
AD: Um, it was Battle Creek Air National Guard Base. Um, they have, I think that’s the closest
one. Next to Detroit.
(48:09)
JS: Now, so then what else were you doing? You get back home and then what do you decide to
do at that point?
AD: Well, the military gave me a lot of skills and I was just really looking for a professional
career in the technical field. And so I spent six months looking for a job, and doing interviews.
And I interviewed with Grand Valley and they offered me a position in June of 2005.
JS: So you didn’t actually choose to go to college, or to take a degree, or…
AD: At that time, no. I had done college work previously. I’d taken random classes here and
there. But I hadn’t really decided that I wanted to go to college. I was thinking about it. I had
the Montgomery GI Bill. I was thinking about it, but at that point in my life I still wasn’t ready.
And I didn’t really know the value of a college education at that point, either.
(49:11)

�JS: And do you find that you’re sort of able to do the kinds of work that you want to do, just
coming out with your military experience and credentials? Does that get you where you want to
go at this point?
AD: It certainly has been beneficial to getting my career now. I don’t necessarily, I mean, I like
my job but I’m very much a geek at heart. I really like to tinker around with the computers and
really do get involved with that type of work. And that’s not something that is necessarily the
focus of my job here. Um, but I really enjoy what I do.
JS: Okay. When you were looking for a job was it an issue that you didn’t have a college
degree, for any of the places you were applying, or…
(50:02)
AD: I know that that was a huge thing. They really wanted a bachelor’s degree. I, at that time,
again, I was thinking, oh well, I have that eight years experience of high technology, so I was
just thinking that should be beneficial, but also I think a lot of it, I didn’t know the civilian world.
The only thing I know is the military, and I still struggle with that today, so going out there and
looking for a job, interviewing, resumes, any of that stuff, I had no idea at all. And, um, the
bachelor’s degree as well, that was a lot of the requirements for the jobs I was applying for. You
know, that is, that is something that is needed out there, so again, the mentality from my family,
you go out and you get a job. You don’t need a degree, a college degree. And so I still didn’t
understand the value of a college education at that point.
(51:03)
JS: Okay. Now if you’re looking at your own experience, what do you think your time in the
service did for you?
AD: Oh, it did so much. It really gave me maturity. It gave me a sense of purpose. It gave me,
it just gave so much to me, discipline, a work ethic. I mean, it made me stronger person.
There’s just so much. And it’s not just the technical portion or my job skills, that’s not really
what I feel the military gave me, even though they gave that to me. I feel it’s the life portion is
really what they gave to me. They gave me a life and something that I didn’t necessarily have
before. So I really value that.
JS: Do you think it really made you a more independent person or someone who could really
function better on her own, or…
(52:00)
AD: Definitely. Definitely gave me a lot of independence, a lot of confidence that, it’s okay, I
can be who I am, I can be independent, as a woman I can be smart, or I can do this, or, you
know, they don’t have the mentality where you’re going to fail. And they’re always, you can do
it. I mean, you have to. You don’t really have choice. So I think that’s been really beneficial.
JS: All right. Anything you’d like to add to the record before we close this out?
AD: No, I don’t think so.

�JS: You did a good job, telling your story. So thank you for laying it out for me today.
AD: Thank you.
(52:36)

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538574">
                <text>DeRoo, Autumn (Interview transcript and video), 2009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538575">
                <text>DeRoo, Autumn</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538576">
                <text>Autumn DeRoo made the choice to join the Air Force at the age of 17 early in her high school career.  Going into a technological field, dealing mainly with computers, Deroo was able to work at Cheyenne Mountain with NORAD and the U.S. Base Command in the States, and was there at the time of the 9/11 attacks. She later served on a NATO base in Portugal, where she was when the Iraq War started in 2003.  She eventually left the military as a Technical Sergeant and  now works at Grand Valley State University.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538577">
                <text>Smither, James (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538579">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538580">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538581">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538582">
                <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538583">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538584">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538585">
                <text>Iraq War, 2003-2011--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538586">
                <text>United States. Air Force</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538587">
                <text>United States. National Guard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538588">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538589">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538590">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="538591">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538596">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="538597">
                <text>2009-12-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547586">
                <text>DerooA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567349">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project Collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794824">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796888">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030944">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="42454" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="46997">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/822a6c8eada60ca96d6acab890ad5a65.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d3c63f2c86ddeddd8048c6c4e8a0cb49</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="812591">
                    <text>-

THE LESSON OF

~BLIN

On August 2, 1943, at one of the most infamous of all Nazi death camps,
600 victims staged a revolt that redefined heroism for this century
TERRENCE DES PRES
B ecause so many vzctims p erished th ere (three to four
million), and because it was th e la rgest of th e Nazi
concentration camps, , Auschwitz has become alm ost
syno nymous with the H olocaust itself B ut whereas
Ausch w itz served many purposes-it was a source of
slave labor and a transit camp as well-th e smaller
"killing cent ers" now seem in a more naked and
brazen way the pure apotheosis of evil. For in Sobzbor,
B elzec, M aidanek , Chelmno, and especially in T reblinka, th e entire existence of these places was designed/ or, and dedicated to , death for death 's salre .
Wh en mass extermination of the J ews began in
Treblinka on J uly 23 , 1942, the Na zis jneserved the
lives of some prisoners to do the actual work of "jJro cessing " the oth ers. But on August 2, 1943, against
incalculable odds, th ese ajJproximately 600 "work
J ews" armed themselves with stolen weapons, attack ed th e guards, burn ed down th e camjJ, and fl ed
into th e nearby Polish f orests . T he Germans, to hide
th eir cnm e, leveled w hat remain ed of th e camjJ. 1h e
Ukranian farm er who I/lo ved zn was instructed to say
th at h e an d his family had lived th ere always.
Of the 200 J ews who lived through the revolt, a.few
more than 40 survived th e war. Th ey claim that, at the
very least, 800,000 men , women, and children died in
Treblinka. But Franciszek Z abecki, w ho was tra(jic
superviso r at th e Treblin ka railroad station and also a
member of the Polish underground, ihinks dUJerently .
Th e methodical Germans ha-d marked numbers on th e
outside o.f arriving cattle cars to indicate how ma ny
victims each car contained. B y keeping a record of
these numbers, Zabecki was able to tell Gitta Seren y ,
autho r oflnt o That Darkn ess , " Th e number of peojJle
kllled in Treblinka was 1,200,-000, and th ere is no
doubt a/Jo u/ it w hatever."
'l'/11' 1w111h!'r.1 rl,,/)(Jli' is / )()mtl1•.1.1 . G1·11" ci1!1' is !.lit•
1.1.1111' onrl wh o/ UJ(' 11cerl lo lmuw is 1/() u, it lir1/1/Jl'lll'lf-th e story of 'f'reblm lw and how the uictilll .1· tlu:111.1·el1Je.1
reuo ft eri. '/ he testzm ony of th e suruiuorsfonns th e basis
of Treb linka, by J ean -Frnnc;ois Stein er. Treblinka
was originally published in Fran ce in 7966; it ap p eared in this coun try in 7967 but has been ou t of pnnt
for five years. This month , it is bezng rep ublished by
N ew Amerzcan L ibra1·y. Th e following article by
T en ence Des Pres, author of The Survivor: An Ana tom y of Life in the Dea th Camps, was written as a new
introduction to th e book.

T

h e particul a rs of the H olocaust are end less.
Blunt shove ls as a preferred method for hacking
prisoners to dea th. C hildren dumped into living
ditches of fl a me. Medical expe rim ents. L a mpsh ades .
So perverse a re such detai ls th at simply to mention
them seems shameful. Sta tisti ca lly the Holocaus t is
less imm edi ately sickenin g because less sharply seeab le; but here, too , rea lity ta kes on a fee ling of unreality which terrifi es . Extermination of m ore than
11 ,000., 000 people in 11ve years, at leas t 6,000 ,000 of
th em J ews, 1,000 ,000 of them children. D eath camps
so effi cient that 20 ,000 human beings cou ld be ''processed" -turn ed from fl es h to smoke-each day. Th e
boast of Treblinka was " from door to door in 45
minutes ," from open ing th e cattle ca rs to slamming
shut th e gas cha mbers . As a n itemi za tion of ev il truly
demoni c, the record of th e H oloca ust g0es on a nd on ,
nor ca n we sum its mean ing, nor does it cease to hau nt
us deeply .
At Ya le U ni ve rsity in th e ea rly 1960s, for exampl e,
socia l psychologist Sta nl ey M ilgram performed his
famous "o bedience experiments" to determin e at
w h a t point a person would r es ist "officia l" directi ves
a nd refuse to continue in a process of obvious cruelty.
The resu lts were un ex pected . Two-thirds of iv1ilgram's voluntee r participa nts (people of di verse ages
a nd jobs) did exactly as they w ere told : und er the guise
of a " learning Lest" th ey followed th e in stru ctions of a
ma n dressed as a "scienlist" a nd appli ed high er a nd
hi gher ch arges of electri ca l shock to "subjects " who
were fa iling to " lea rn " properly . This process went
on , in some cases, until the "s ubjects" a ppeared to be
h av in g heart a ttacks . Th e whole thing was faked,
including the electri ca l cha rges, but th e volunteers ,
who were the real subj ec ts, did not know this.*
On e of 1hc pcnili ;1ri1ics nl' 1hc experiment was th ;11.
111 ;111 y v11lu11tccrs lcnd cd lo su ffer increasin g ly l'rolll
stress as th e vo lta ge appea red to be in creasing, yet
the y were un a ble to stop. In some cases they bega n to
la ugh h ys terica ll y, la u ghter so pain ed a nd j agged th at
*The "s ubjects," who were trained acto rs, were st ra pped into
cha irs, a n electrode a ttached lo each wrist. The volunteers read
a loud li sts of sim ple word pairs w hi ch th e subjects were required to
remember a nd repeat on dema nd . Wh en the su bjects did not a nswe r
proper ly, the scienti sts , or a uthority figur es, ordered the volunteers
to adm ini ster shocks up to 450 volts, Milgram concluded th a t
" rela ti vely few people have the reso urces to resist a uthority ," even
when they believe their obed ience is producing evil.

Copyright © 1979 New Ameri can Library

Qi

@4

g

a a

C

JUNE

a

4

..

,

15

�Their aim? To bear witness. To rise
up and fight against impossible odds so
that at least one person among them
would survive to tell the world.

thus, by some mad logic, remain pure and remote
from their own evil.
The great killing centers were six: AuschwitzBirkenau, M a idanek , Ghelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, and
Treblinka , all of them named for rural villages near
which , in the occupied territories of Eastern Europe,
they were built. A camp like Auschwitz murdered
very large numbers of human beings daily , but it also
served as an administrative center for the camp system
as a whole a nd likewise as a source of slave labor for
industries producing war materiel. Other camps,
Treblinka in particular, were designed for one thing
on ly: to kill as many peop le as possibl e, as fast as
poss ible. These cam ps, often referred to as "death
fa ctories ," embody a principle I would call demonic
rather than merely in sane, for insanity has neither .
firm structure nor a steady goal. What went on in the
killing ce nters was highly organized, and the goal was
very definite indeed: routines were established; different methods of killing were experimented with; solid
bureaucratic systems implemented the extermination
process at every stage of its operation; and large
numbers of men an d women went daily a bout their
jobs fully awa re th at the ent ire a im of this gigantic
underta king was murder , that the main and final
produ ct of this modern ized fa ctory system was dea th .
The dedi cation of life's energi es to the production of
death is a demoni c principle of the first degree.
Concomitant with it is a second , similar principle,
na mely, that unlike any example of genocide I can
think of from the thi ck history of mankind's inhum a nity- the slaughter of the American Indians 5 for exampl e, or the decim a tion of cities that dared to resist this
or th a t "world co nqueror" (as Genghis Khan liked t.o
ca ll hiin se lf)- t he destruction of the European Jews
had no ra tion a l moti ve whatsoever, neither politics
nor plunder, neither military strategy nor the moment 's blind expediency.
The demonic irrationality of this policy becomes all
th e more apparent when we observe th a t if the killing
ce nters were geographically remote, they were neverth eless connected by a massive railway system th a t
shipped "cargo" mar ked "s pecial treatment" from al l
corners of Europe , as far east as Greece. This geographic "swee p" involved the crossing of many national borders a nd is again a n indication of the apocalyptic dimension of the Holocaust. For here, too , the
point was not to get rid of this or that group, this or
that popul at ion which had come into pol itica l or
tact ical disfavor , but to re,1ch as far across the earth as
poss ibl e in order th ;1t death , for the Jews , mi g ht be
abso lut e. The frenzy ;ind obsessiveness of this drive
m ay be gauged from the fac t th at during the last days
of the war , when Hitler 's Reich was clearly collapsing
a nd every soldier and every piece of a rtillery was
desperately needed to defend what was left of the
homeland , trains that mi ght have been used to transport troops and war supplies were in stead·, and without objection, employed to ship the last large community of Jews - those of Hungary-to Auschwitz.

the soul itself seemed torn. But the worst and most
revealing part of their experiment cam e later, when
they were inform ed of the ro le they had innocently
played. Disturbed by what they ha d don e, some felt
compelled to judge the·mselves and they did it in term s
of the Holocaust. They suddenly saw themselves as
men and women who could indeed behave as Hitler's
SS troops behaved-only following orders to be sure,
but fol lowing orders nonetheless. And a lthough it is
ludicrous to compare a clini cal experiment a t Ya le
with events in the death camps, the fact that we do
m a ke such spontaneous connections reveals a central
truth of our time. At some unconscious level, the
image of the Holocaust is with us-a memory that
haunts, a sound in g boa.r d for all subsequent evil.
For the vict im s of the Holocaust I cannot speak.
Th eir ago ny, wh ich to this day is visible in the
millions of scratches made by fingernails on the ceilings of th e gas cha mbers , is theirs with a finality none
of the li ving ca n know . But for us who dwell in its
aftermath, th e most awful thing about the Holocau st
is simply that it happened. h entered the world not of
fantasy or science Gction but of fact , of history , the
world that is real a nd present a nd ours. And judging
from things like the Milgra m experiments , from the
perpetual fascination with Hitler a nd the Nazis , from
the sudden eruption of interest in the Holoca ust itself,
its prese nce in memory has not only lasted but-40
years after the event-has grown in force and authority. Simply as a fact and as a precedent , it mocks our
desire to affirm life' s goodness and undermines our
hope th a t never again will huma n beings gather in
such vas t and well-ordered numbers to commit mass
murder. It sta nds as proof of the hum an potential for
ra di ca l evil a nd therefore also as a prophecy of our
possib le future . Which is to say th a t after the Holoca ust , we know, we know full we ll , that life ·can be
governed by death .

T

he first N azi camps, which were set up soon after
Hitl er came to power in 1933, were d esig ned as
places of dete ntion a nd as training g rounds for the SS.
Dachau and Buchenwald were among the most notoriou s, and , although we cannot forget that thou sa nds
of people peri shed in these places , we shou ld alsn keep
in m ind th at ca mps of this kind were not intended or
equipped to be instrum ents of genocide , nor were
Jews their only victims. After the outbreak of the war,
however , a nd as the N azi po li cy of mass extermination took shape w ith the Jews as primary target, the
major " killing centers ," as they came to be called,
began to operate. And all of them were located outside
the Reich itse lf-as if in this way the Germans co uld
indulge in atrocity without tainting German soil a nd

JUNE

.

-

.

.

,.,,_

17

~

- . -~ ..... - '

�Th e H oloca ust is an unpar a ll eled exa mple of
power run wild , whi ch is to sa y th a t once evil on this
scale pi cks up enough momentum , once it esta bli shes
itself in a system of fun ctioning structures, it ca nnota fter a ce rta in cru cia l point - be stopped by any
counterforce within itself. Th e worst thing th a t can be
said of vas t power is not tha t it in evita bly co rrupts its
agents , but th a t a fter som e point its depl oy ment
becom es grea ter th a n th e w ill of th e m en wh o serve it.
Wh at ca n be d es troyed , will be destroyed , a lesson the
H olocaust confirms a nd which w e, with our B- 52s
a nd nuclea r subma rines, our ta lk of " death yi elds"
a nd " ove rkill ," might wi sh to remember.

l "l Th en we think of the N az i camps (of whi ch , by

I

VV the w ay , there w ere hundreds) , w e tend to think
of the m ost notoriou s exa mples , Auschwi tz in par ti cula r , a nd furth er to think in terms of a few compelling
images . In th e mind 's fea rful eye, we see long lin es of
men a nd women digging th eir own graves. We see Dr.
M engel e, immacul a te in his SS uniform , sta nding
before endless column s of peopl e on a r ail way ra mp,
sl owly moving a single fin ger of hi s g loved ha nd to th e
rig ht (d eat h) , to the left (tempora ry life). W e rem ember , from frag m ents of docum enta ry film , open ove ns
full of as h a nd bone a nd , perh a ps most per sisten tly,
th e giga nti c pil es of the dead being bulldozed into pits .
All of this is true , of co urse , bu t such im ages ar e
themselves so overwh elming, so fin a l in their a utonom ous horror , th a t the mind stops, defea ted in its effort
to comprehend . The dra m a ti c na ture of th e H oloca ust, th a t is to say, a nd es pecia ll y wh en it becomes
ma nifest thro ug h iso la ted images, obscures one of its
most importa nt as pects.
F or th e co ncent rat ion ca mps w ere not only fac tori es of dea th , they were w orlds in whi ch m a ny thousands of m en and women lived, th eir ra nks co ntin ua lly depl eted by dea th from sta rva ti on , from bea ting,
from r a ndom killing, from sickn ess a nd exh a usti on ,
a nd sometimes from shee r suffocation in horror , bu t
ra nks imm ediate ly r efill ed with oth er pri so ners w ho
th en w ent on with the wo rk o f runnin g th e ca mp ,
la boring in the fa ctories , sorting the tons a nd tons of
clothing a nd utensil s left behind by the victim s. The
dea th ca mps we re a world unto themse lves , a nd the
wor st thing a bout exi sten ce in such a pl ace, a pa rt from
th e filth a nd pa in a nd consta nt da nger , was th a t those
pri so ners wh o ha d been "chose n ," who had bee n sent
to a wo rk deta il ra th er th a n th e gas cha mber , stayed
a li ve onl y by in volvem ent in th e process of killing.
Wh en we try lo im ag in e such a wo rld , three qu esti ons of furi ous signifi ca nce a ri se: I low did th e
inm a tes of th e dea th ca mps stay a li ve a t a ll ' Wh a t did
li vin g und er such co nditi ons do to th eir so ul s, th eir
sense of th em se lves as hum a n beings' And w h y did
th ey go on w ith th eir horrid wo rk w hen , as survivo rs
tell us, it was so mu ch eas ier lo die a nd th e tempta tion
to slip into pe rm a nen t ob li vion or deli berately ge t
oneself kill ed w a s infinitely m ore a ppealing th a n the
w ave ring will to go on '

18

QUEST /79

C hi ef a mon g th e virtues of J ean-Fra n c;oi s Stein er's
T reblinka is that it a nsw ers th ese ques ti ons. N ot in
their enti re ty , perh a ps, nor to ever yo ne 's sa ti sfacti on,
bu t w ith a degree of passiona te a ttention that provides
a n overa ll pi ct ure of th e death camp as a world of its
own . !vlore th a n th a t, however, from a mid such da rkness T reblinka p roj ects a n im age of hum a n streng th
a nd hum a n goodn ess so fra il ye t stu bbornl y persistent , so ravaged a nd mutil a ted yet rebelli ous again st
its own defea t, its own extin cti on , th a t th e H olocaus t
itself begins to loo k different wh en the story of this
camp beco mes known .
Th ere a re ma n y studies of the conce ntra tion camp
system (Euge n Kogon 's T he T heory and Practice of
H ell is es pecia ll y in st ru cti ve), m a ny m a ps a nd sta ti sti cs , a ll of them va lu a ble. There a re a lso ma ny excellent , indeed in va lu a bl e, acco unts by survivors themselves, persona l ac ts of bearing w itness th a t a llow us to
see , if onl y na rrowl y a nd in fragm ents, wh a t survivo rs
them selves sa w a nd experi enced. But , so fa r as I
know, exce pt fo r J ea n-Fra nc;•- is Ste_iner 's T reblinka
there exi sts no story , p resent ed from th e inside, of the
orig in , th e busin ess-as- usua l, a nd th e fin a l dem ise of a
m aj or dea th ca m p. By "s tory" I mean ex act ly wha t
Ari stotl e m ea nt : a hum a n ac ti on throu gh whi ch the
age nts th emselves are d efin ed , a n ac tion with a beginning, a middl e , a nd a n end , w ith a ll its pa rts-i~ thi s
case a ll th ose free-Fl oa ting im ages th a t ha unt ussubordin ated to a w holeness th a t g ives th e de ta il s a t
least some degree of perspecti ve a nd mea ning.
Stein er ma nages to reco nstruct the rea lity of one of
th e p rin cipal killing ce nters by giving us th e story of the
men w ho b uil t it , th e men wh o ra n it , th e m en a nd
women who dest royed it. H e did thi s by perso na ll y
interview in g a ll th e survivors he was a bl e to find or wh o
wo uld permit th emselves lo be fo und -a di stin cti on I
ma ke only to suggest th e diffi cult y of Stein er 's und erta king, sin ce to thi s day th ere is un ce rta inty abo u t th e
p recise nu m ber of peop le w ho ca me ou t of T reb linka.
Th e num ber is somew here aro und 40. Fo rt y out of th e
1,000 ,000 inm ates. Fo rt y out of th e 600 w ho revo lted .
The number is pitiful , ye t w ithout thi s tin y remn a nt
th e fac ts abo ut T re blink a would never be know n . Th e
whole thing would neve r have happe ned . Wh ere th er e
is no story, th ere is no rea lity.
This meth od has its dra w.bac ks a nd , sin ce it s publica ti on in Fra nce in 1966, T rehlin lw has rema in ed
co nt ro versial. Bcc;iu sc tellin g th e stor y from in sid e
rc4uircs noveli sti c techni q ues , St ein er free ly portrays
d1 ;1racte rs, rcconstit ut cs co11 ve rs;1tion s, a nd (ill s in
mi ss in g dc1;1il s in o rcln to co n vey the csse nti ;il s pirit o f
th e events on w hi ch th e sto ry depe nd s. I le a lso sulist itu les fi cti ona l na m es lo pro tect the na m es of su rv ivors
(th e na mes of th e kill ers a re not cha nged), a nd th ere
has bee n hea ted deba te ove r parti cul a r cha racte ri za ti ons. But th ese a re not, I fee l, se riou s obj ecti ons so
long as th e st ru ct u re of the story as a w hole re(Da in s
tru e to know n facts. And in thi s respect, 'T reblinka is
as cl ose to th e fac ts as we a re lik ely to com e. A more
vigorou s criti cism has been S tein er's insistent th eme

l

�of J ewi sh passi vity in the face of impending disaster.
But aga in , the centra l event whi ch sets the story of
T reblinka a part a nd m a kes the book spe_cia l-the
eventu a l revolt of th e p ri soners a nd .the destruction of
the ca mp- tempers if not boldl y contradi cts the theme
of in action .
N ew inform a ti on has com e to ligh t sin ce T reblin ka
w as publi shed , but none of it di scredi ts or se ri ously
qu a lifi es th e stor y Stein er has give n u s. The possibl e
exce ption is S teiner 's depi ction of the m eti culous care
w ith w hi ch the " techni cia ns," as he ca ll s th em , went
abo ut perfecting th eir infern a l m ac hin e. The arc hitects of th e death camps a ppear as m as ter pl a nners
w ho, exce pt for th eir mi sjudgm ent of the J ewi sh will
to resist, r a n th e camps with a techni ca l expertise a t
once detac hed , controll ed , a nd precise. T o some extent
thi s was tru e, a nd Stein er uses hi s portra it of th e
" techni cia ns" to give us a se nse of th e deliberate ness,
th e fa mous Germ a n at tention to order a nd efficiency
w ith whi ch the higher offi cia ls- men not th em sel ves
directl y in volved in th e d ay- to-day m adness-oversaw th e opera ti on as a w hole.
W e now kn ow , how ever, th a t a gr ea t deal of sloppiness, of tria l a nd error, a nd a lso mu ch heavy d r inking
undermin ed th e powe r of these na m eless m en wh o
we re once thoug ht to be so full y in comm a nd . Th e
most va lu a bl e ev id ence com es from Gitta Ser eny 's
se ri es of in terviews w ith F ra nz Sta ngl, w ho had bee n
th e comm a nd a nt of Treblink a a t th e tim e of th e re volt.
H av ing Aed to Brazil by way of th e so-ca ll ed " V a tica n
E sca pe R ou te ," Stangl was extradited in 1967 (th e
year a ft er Treblinka ap peared ) a nd sen tenced to life
im p ri sonm ent in Du sseldorfR em a nd Pri son . During
th e las t days of hi s life he ag r eed to ta lk w ith Sereny,
and Into That D arkn ess, the record of th ei r encounter,
revea ls a m a n for whom fear a nd bew ilderment had
a lways been s pr ings of behav ior . Intelli gent a nd in
so me ways ge n u in ely hum a ne but neve r sure of
him se lf, S ta ngl was a man w ho was onl y, a nd oft en
with mu ch hesita ti on , doing hi s job as a dmini stra to r- a _job w hi ch in volved pa perwo rk more th a n
ac tion but w hi ch a lso, in S ta ngl's case , required a
la rge g lass of bra nd y so tha t slee p might com e after th e
stench a nd outcry of a ty pi cal da y in Treblinka .

I

T
The stages through which the prisoners
passed on their way to open revolt
can be seen as a regeneration of spirit
amounting a lmost literally to resurrection.

her e a re, as I have indi ca ted , sca tte red acco unt s
of surviva l in T reb link a. But onl y in S tein er 's
boo k do we get th e stor y of th e ca mp fro m its beg innings in th e su111111 er of 1942 to it s a brupt end on
Au g ust 2, 1943. And wh;1t m;ik es thi s story importa nt
is ;i hovc a ll it s endin g. So n ea tl y docs our ha bit o!'
bl a ming victim s mes h w ith th e idea that th e J ews
"we nt to their dea th lik e shee p" tha t ev id ence to the
cont ra ry goes unnoti ced . Bruno Bette lh eim , himse lf
a n "ea rl y" survivor of Bu chen wa ld and surely not a
sheep , has co ntribu ted more tha n a n yo ne else to thi s
mi sta ken noti on by in sisting th a t ca m p pri son ers
could not "see th emselves as full y a dult pe rsons," th at
th ey fell into an "a non ymous m ass" a nd be haved lik e
" in competent children ." S uch p rocla ma tions ignore
J UNE

19

�th e ca refull y ca lcul a ted , full y a dult tac ti cs th a t, ever ywhere in th c· concc ntra ti o n ca mps, th e pri so ne rs u sed
to cre;1tc und e rgro und o rga ni za tion s a nd ne two rk s of
res istance , thu s sav in g th ou sa nd s of lives. Ce rt ;1inl y
th e 13 ette lh c im th esis does no t acco unt fo r th e s m a ll
revolts w ithin va ri o u s ca mps, a ll of th em doom ed fro m
th e sta rt , not to m e ntio n th e W a rsaw G h etto upri sin g,
th e des tru ction of Sobibor , or th e hope less r evo lt of th e
Au sch w it z Sondercn mmando , w hi ch was ab le, be fo re
ba tta li o ns of SS troo ps m ac hin e-g unn ed th em down ,
to bl ow u p o ne of th e m a in crem a to ri a .
Th e stor y of Tre blink a not onl y di sc redits th e
"s hee p " th eo r y, it in stru cts u s a new in th e ca pacity of
th e hum a n s pirit to e ndure. 1'v1 en a nd wom e n brut a lized beyo nd hum a n recogniti on , ho pe less as we sha ll
never be ho pe less, a nd with a bso lutely no h elp or
en co urage m ent from o utsid e fo rces- th ese peo pl e
w e re neverth e less ab le to rega in a sen se of th eir own
worth as hum a n be in gs, o rga ni ze a sys tem of underg round res ista nce, suffer setback a ft e r se tback as
me mbe rs we re kill ed , secure a rm s und e r very ti g ht
su rveill a nce, a nd th e n m ove togeth e r , w ith o ne spiri t
a nd o ne a im , to su ccess full y shoot down th eir ca pto rs
a nd blow up th e ca mp . Th e ir a im ::' Th e " mi ss io n "
th a t ca rri ed them throu g h month s a nd m o nth s of
des pa ir in a project tha t from th e beginnin g seem ed
in sa ne? T o bea r witn ess. To rise up a nd fi g ht aga in st
im poss ibl e odd s so th a t o ne-a t leas t o ne pe rso n
a m o ng th e m -wo uld survive in a bsolute o bliga ti on to
te ll th e w o rld wh a t th e n a m e " Tre blinka" ha d com e to
sig nify .
· C o nsid e r th e cos t, the m ora l d a m age, of such a n
u nd ert a kin g. /\ su ccessful ba ttl e could ta ke pl ace onl y
throu g h th e co ll ecti ve act io n of pri so ne rs w ho ha d
stayed a li ve lo ng eno ug h to orga ni ze th em se lves in to
ri go ro us fi g hting units. You ca nnot wage w a r w ithout
pl a nnin g , w ith out lea ders, wi th out a strik e for ce
di vid ed into specia li zed squ a ds, each w ith its _a ppoin ted tas k. But a n y su ch o rga ni zati on , es p ecia ll y if
it mu st sta rt from nothin g, ta kes tim e , a nd tim e in
Treblinka mea nt o ne thing onl y: surviva l. Pri soners
sta yed a li ve by killing others so th a t th e killin g it self
rn uld be sto pped a nd th e crime be m a de kn ow n . Th e
logic of thi s p redi ca m e nt w as as te rribl e as th e pl ace
itself, a n in to le ra bl e to rm ent som e how to be bo rn e if
life and res ista nce we re to support each oth e r.
G ivc n th e cxtrc mit y of th e ir initi a l dcg ra d a t io n , the
stages throu g h w hi ch the pri so ne rs passed o n the ir
way lo open revol t ca n he see n as a rege ne rat ion of
spirit ;1111ounting almost lite ra lly to res urrection . Th e
first st;1gc of revo lt , th e first hum a nl y pos iti ve an in
thi s de rnoni c;1ll y perver ted world , was sui cid e. i\t
so m e point , pri son e rs bega n to see th a t by ta kin g th e ir
own li ves th ey co uld th e reby say No lo Treblink a, a nd
durin g th e ea rl y m onth s th e re w e re m a n y su icides
each ni g ht. But th e n the second s tage asse rt ed itse lf.
/\s pri son ers bega n to kno w a nd tru st each o th er ,
esca pe beca me poss ibl e. Tra in s loaded w ith th e clo thing a nd possess ion s of th e dead we re co ntinu a ll y
lea ving th e ca mp , a nd , with th e coo rdin a ted he lp of

I

20

QUEST/ 79

co mra des, a p r iso ne r could co ncea l him se lf in a loa ded
boxca r . Or , aga in w ith th e h elp of o th e rs, a p ri so ner
co uld m a ke hi s way to the o pen dit ches wh ere th e dead
we re pil ed a nd , lying th e re as if dead , a w a it ni g htfa ll
to craw l from th e g rave, slip und er th e w ire (not
e lect rified as in Au schwitz), a nd brea k for th e for es t.
So m e a tte mpts fa il ed , o th ers su cceeded , a nd t heir
su ccess tell s us two thin gs. P eop le o utsid e th e ca mp
ce rta inl y did kn ow w hat was go ing o n in sid e. But a lso,
in thi s seco nd ph ;1se of defi a nce . small unit s of coopera ti on beca m e es ta bli shed a m o ng the pri so ne rs. w hi ch
not o nl y ge ne ra ted a reb irth of hope but sta rted th e
process of tru st a nd coll ective orga ni za ti o n w itho ut
whi ch th e third a nd fin a l stage could neve r have
occurred . i\nd just as esca pe rul ed o ut sui cid e, th e
stage of a rm ed revo lt rul ed ou t esca pe. Wh ere th e help
of eve r yo n e w as needed , sui cid e and esca pe beca me
person a l lu x uri es. To burn down th e camp a nd
release pri so ner s in numbers la rge e noug h to in sure
th e sur viva l of ;tt leas t a few, no thing less th a n a n
absolu te comm u nit y of ~tru gg le, tra nscending per o na l ho pe, beca m e th e o ne w ay to victory.
And hence th e va lu e of Freblinka , its hi storica l
impo rt as a slory . Th ro ug h tim e a de finite sequ ence of
ac ti o n g rew a nd asse rted it se lf, culmin a tin g in o ne of
th e m os t unlik e ly triumph s in the hi sto r y of hum a n
stru ggle. And with th e sto r y com es a new definition of
h ero ism . F o r if, in thi s age of to ta lit a ri a n gove rnm ent
a nd m ass murd e r , we a re tcrs pca k of h eroi sm a l a ll , it
m a kes sense on ly in te rm s of co ll ecti ve ac ti on deli bera te ly a nd oft en ho peless ly pitt ed aga in st e normous
stru ctures of ev il. I t ca nn o t be fr a m ed in te rm s of the
old he roi c ethi c, w h ere in th e indi vidu a l, as a n indi vidu a l, de fi es powe r a nd w illin gly di es fo r a g lo ri ous
ca use . The re is no g lo r y a nd , in a w o rld w he re death
rul es, d ying fo r a n ything at a ll becom es stu pid ,
becom es a bdi ca ti o n . V e ry few of th e pa rti cipa n ts in
th e Treblinka revo lt survived , but w ha t th ey foug ht
fo r was life.
W e li ve in da rk tim es a nd th e sto r y of Tre blinb is
wo rth kn ow ing . It is w o rth holding to w ith a ll th e
soul 's streng th . It is, th at is to say, a n exa mpl e of w ha t
a ha ndful of hum a n be ings can do, of s piritu a l da m age
susta in ed without ca pitul a tion , a nd lik ew ise of a bsolut e power w hi ch tu rn s o ut to he less tha n a bso lute.
i\ nd it re mind s us, les t we o ve rlook a s ig nifi ca nt fan,
that in th e Mil g ra m ohccli e ncc ex pe rim ents, w hi ch I
m e ntion ed ea rli er , if two-third s of t he voluntee rs did
as th ey we re o rdered , o ne-third did no l.
Th e st ru ctu res of ev il g ro w m o re sop hi stica ted ,
m ore finel y tuned a nd orga ni zed . Th ey proli f'c r;ttc
a nd int e rl ock and a id c;1ch o th e r and cove r th e pl ;1tH'l
a nd beg in , lik e th e I l o loca ust, to a ppea r overw he lming. Wh en gove rnm ent s ac ross th e face of th e ea rth ,
no t ex cluding o ur ow n , a re p re pa red to sac rifi ce
po pul at io ns a nd s hoo t clow n protest in a n y form ,
w hen da rkn ess begin s to see m to ta l, proo f to th e
co ntra r y beco m es in va lu a bl e. Wh a t hap pened at Trebl ink a is proof lo th e contra r y, a nd on su ch ha rd ra re
p roof o ur hum a nness de pe nds.
~

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="40">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810174">
                  <text>Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810175">
                  <text>Termaat, Adriana B. (Schuurman) </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810176">
                  <text>Termaat, Peter N.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810177">
                  <text>Collection contains genealogical, personal, and family papers and photographs documenting the lives and interests of Adriana and Peter Termaat. The bulk of the materials are related to family history and genealogical research carried out by the Termaats, including research notes and materials about places in the Netherlands that were significant to the Termaat and Schuurman families, such as the city of Alkmaar.&#13;
&#13;
Other materials in the collection are related to the Termaats' experiences on the eve of and during the Second World War, especially the German occupation of the Netherlands and the Termaats' participation in organized resistance to the Nazis. Also included are materials that document the family's post-war life in the United States, including their public efforts to recognize, commemorate, and honor people and events significant to World War II.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810178">
                  <text>1869 - 2012</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810179">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/719"&gt;Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection, RHC-144&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810180">
                  <text>Netherlands</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810181">
                  <text>Netherlands--History--German occupation, 1940-1945 </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810182">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810183">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945 -- Underground movements -- Netherlands</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="811643">
                  <text>Dutch</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="811644">
                  <text>Dutch Americans</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810184">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810185">
                  <text>RHC-144</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810186">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810187">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810188">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810189">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810190">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810191">
                  <text>nl</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812577">
                <text>RHC-144_Termaat_NWS_1979-The-Lesson-of-Treblinka-335</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812578">
                <text>Des Pres, Terrence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812579">
                <text>1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812580">
                <text>The Lessons of Treblinka</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812581">
                <text>Photocopied magazine article. New American Library.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812582">
                <text>Treblinka (Concentration camp)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="812583">
                <text>World War, 1939-1945 -- Atrocities</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="812584">
                <text>World War, 1939-1945 -- Prisoners and prisons, German</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812585">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/719"&gt;Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection (RHC-144)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812587">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812588">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812589">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812590">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1032985">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="42475" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="47018">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/81a9c6d05960b29d21bc0e1f47f5b73b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2f3deb232c425fdb674996854d317579</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="812894">
                    <text>The Detroit News

--

Monday

Section B

.

,

' .

OBITUARIES 3E
.. : MORE LOCAL NEWS 3E

JUNE 3,
1991

Jews to honor.couple. who risked allto save.their lives ~

helped people the Nazis hunted in .Ho~lan~. ~r

THE DETROIT NEWS

If the Nazis had caught Peter and
Adrienna Termaat hiding Jews during World War II, the young Chris- awardabecausesomanyothen1dkho
tian couple officially would have been much more," said Termaat, 77, wh.o
labeled as Jewish and killed as ene- with his wife will receive the Courage·
mies of Adolf Hitler.
to Care Award at 7:30 p.m. in the
It was a risk the Termaats dared Jewish Community Center, West '
Bloomfield Township.
to tak e on f81'th ·
"B ut then you rea
. 1·1ze th·1s gives
'
.
.'.
rhey ferried Jews m and out of .. you a chance to publicize what haptheir Holland home and the homes of pened," Termaat said. "It gives us a
ot~er members .of the underground chance to tell people that if they
r~s1stance. Their eff~rts saved the really live their faith, they should
hves of co~ntless JeWish men, wom- never say no to a situation like (the
en ai:td children.
· · · one we faced)."
On Tuesday evening, Metro De- ,
In addition, lgnacy, Helen and
troit's Jewish community will honor Cezary Chorazyczewski, who also
the Termaats, who now live in Grand rescued Jews, will be honored. The
Rapids, and other rescuers who Chorazyczewskis now live in Michibrought moments of light and hope gan.
to one of history's darkest periods.
The awards also honor the victory
"At first, you are loath to accep~ of good over evil, said Abraham
\,

1

.,,

•-+M ......,
11
. ~t ....1.~.S~:~~~
¼·l ~G Hi

t ....•....,,._
..._•_.!"
:.:.,

•

'

•:

'

•

\

!

,••
'
,'

i
(

.

.

' ...

Have~: Peter Termaat and wife, :Adrienna:· :.,:_:,:

Br Kate Desmet

t

'

,

· .,

" .
,, .
· ••'
··· .
Foxman, national director:·or '. the
Anti-Defamation Leaguer --Who will
be the ceremony's keynote speaker.
Foxman survived the Holocaust as a
child because his Catholic nanny hid
him for four years in Poland.
.
·· "For years, HoIocaust survivors
have borne witness to the magnitude
of evil that man· is capable of,"
Foxman said. ·
"It is very important for that to be
recorded and documented. But the .
. message ·of hidden children like my~
self is not one of death and hate and ..
evil, but one of life and love. Each :',
one of us can tell about one or two or •
three people who rejected· evil :and
risked their lives to save another

,

.

..,::,:;} RODGER D. GARRISON/ Auociated Preu

• :\1 ,,:~'.

I

•' I

~

'

'

',

·

Peter and Adrlenlia Termaat &amp;Jived .Jews during the war. In DePlease see Holocaust
,
2B
/
trolt-~ ••'on Tuesday,
.the'y'll
be
honored
by•a grateful
community.
• • •
.. ., ., ,' I ,
.
-~ ,
• .
•
~

~

�Holocaust: Jews will honor
couple who saved Jna:q.y lives
From page 1B

human being.
.
· "It's a testimony to human decency." ·.
The Termaats, members of the
Reformed Church of America, said
their religious roots spurred their
heroic acts.
."It was not that we thought a long
time about what we should do,"
Termaat said. "We _just acted on
what we saw happening. Here we'd
lived in a country where freedom of
religion and civil liberties had always
been allowed and all of a sudden they
were being violated.
'
"The Nazis were interfering with
Jews at the university and where
Jews were living. That had never
happened in Holland before."
The Termaats, whose first baby
was born only 13 days before the
Germans marched into Holland in
1940, immediately became active in
the underground.
By day, Termaat was an accountant. At night, he was active in
setting up safe houses for Jews and
downed Allied pilots, while his wife
cared for Jews who regularly appeared and disappeared from their
home with doctored passports and
identification papers.
One day, as Termaat strode to
work in the town of Alkmaar, north
of Amsterdam, his minister called
out to him.
"He told me that a school principal in another town was hiding a
young Jewish couple but he couldn't
do it any longer," Termaat said. "He

asked if I would be willing to help

out." ·,
.
.
So Termaat and a local carpenter

traveled by train on a dangerous
journey to pick up the frightened
• couple, who had been engaged to
· marry when they fled Germany.
"They were amazed to see us and to
see that we were willing to take them
with us (back to Alkmaar)."
But when they-got off the train on
their return, the Gestapo stopped the
rescuers, who were carrying bags of
apples.
"The Gestapo knew we did not
have apple trees in northern Holland
and he wanted to know where we'd
gotten them from," Termaat said.
"So we just told him they were from
friends of ours.
"I admired the presence of mind
of the Jewish couple. When they saw
us get stopped, they just kept walking
past us as if they didn't know who we
were. The Gestapo eventually let us
go and we got the couple into a safe
house. They survived the war, got
married and saw peace come to the
land."
.
Foxman said society must salute
such heroics.
·
"The majority of people (during
the war) were either apathetic, fearful or participated in the Nazi persecution," he said.
"Today, living in a time where life
is cheap and there is so much violence, we can celebrate life and goodness by honoring the people who
showed such great courage in the face
of evil.".
·

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="40">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810174">
                  <text>Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810175">
                  <text>Termaat, Adriana B. (Schuurman) </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810176">
                  <text>Termaat, Peter N.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810177">
                  <text>Collection contains genealogical, personal, and family papers and photographs documenting the lives and interests of Adriana and Peter Termaat. The bulk of the materials are related to family history and genealogical research carried out by the Termaats, including research notes and materials about places in the Netherlands that were significant to the Termaat and Schuurman families, such as the city of Alkmaar.&#13;
&#13;
Other materials in the collection are related to the Termaats' experiences on the eve of and during the Second World War, especially the German occupation of the Netherlands and the Termaats' participation in organized resistance to the Nazis. Also included are materials that document the family's post-war life in the United States, including their public efforts to recognize, commemorate, and honor people and events significant to World War II.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810178">
                  <text>1869 - 2012</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810179">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/719"&gt;Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection, RHC-144&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810180">
                  <text>Netherlands</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810181">
                  <text>Netherlands--History--German occupation, 1940-1945 </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810182">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810183">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945 -- Underground movements -- Netherlands</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="811643">
                  <text>Dutch</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="811644">
                  <text>Dutch Americans</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810184">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810185">
                  <text>RHC-144</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810186">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810187">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810188">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810189">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810190">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810191">
                  <text>nl</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812880">
                <text>RHC-144_Termaat_NWS_1991-06-03-Detroit-News-Courage-to-Care-Award</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812881">
                <text>DeSmet, Kate</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812882">
                <text>1991-06-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812883">
                <text>Jews to honor couple who risked all to save their lives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812884">
                <text>Newspaper article about Pieter and Adriana Termaat's receipt of the Courage to Care Award at the Jewish Community Center in West Bloomfield Township, Michigan.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812885">
                <text>The Detroit News</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812886">
                <text>Dutch Americans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="812887">
                <text>World War, 1939-1945 -- Jews -- Rescue</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812888">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/719"&gt;Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection (RHC-144)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812890">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812891">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812892">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812893">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1033006">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="42437" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="46981">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a624b32c5654ae803800e1369967c1ee.pdf</src>
        <authentication>74f5975f625494a8935e912d7e529618</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="812348">
                    <text>DETROIT AIR REGIONAL OFFICE
CENTRAL AIR PROCUREMENT DISTRICT
WEST WARREN AVENUE AND LONYO BOUIEVARD
DETROIT 32, MICHIGAN

24 Oeto\el' 19JI

CEHDE

SUBJECT:
TO:

Authorization for Visit

CoaUua\al

•• Co

ao5 Nara, ,.,..,

II.on

l.
This office interposes no objection to the visit outlined below, providing visit is convenient to the contractor and visitor(}) has ('JHI;,) acce:,s to
information commensurate to degree of clearance relative to purpose of visit only:

Clearance

_______________________
1Jalla11ltle4

_________

....,.....__........
~MILU-1

ln,ma

Citizenship _ _ _ct.. .;. . il..;;;..;.1~•.cc.. o~t;:;.. ;•;~•~*=~r~
l aa4=~•=----------------

Employee(/) of _ _ _ _...;..._ __.;..._ _...,:;.._ _ _....;:.._...::;.._-=-_;;;..__;.;;;.;;..;.;;...;;;;.,_~1.. •uoul

Classification of Project _ _ _ _ _~•.;..;.;;.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
2.
It is requested that the visitor(s) be notified direDtJ with information
copy to this office, in the· event visit is inconvenient.
FOR THE AIR RE GIONAL REPRESENTATIVE:

HENRY L. O'MALIEY
Chief, Security Office

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="40">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810174">
                  <text>Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810175">
                  <text>Termaat, Adriana B. (Schuurman) </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810176">
                  <text>Termaat, Peter N.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810177">
                  <text>Collection contains genealogical, personal, and family papers and photographs documenting the lives and interests of Adriana and Peter Termaat. The bulk of the materials are related to family history and genealogical research carried out by the Termaats, including research notes and materials about places in the Netherlands that were significant to the Termaat and Schuurman families, such as the city of Alkmaar.&#13;
&#13;
Other materials in the collection are related to the Termaats' experiences on the eve of and during the Second World War, especially the German occupation of the Netherlands and the Termaats' participation in organized resistance to the Nazis. Also included are materials that document the family's post-war life in the United States, including their public efforts to recognize, commemorate, and honor people and events significant to World War II.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810178">
                  <text>1869 - 2012</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810179">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/719"&gt;Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection, RHC-144&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810180">
                  <text>Netherlands</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810181">
                  <text>Netherlands--History--German occupation, 1940-1945 </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810182">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810183">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945 -- Underground movements -- Netherlands</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="811643">
                  <text>Dutch</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="811644">
                  <text>Dutch Americans</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810184">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810185">
                  <text>RHC-144</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810186">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810187">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810188">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810189">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="810190">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="810191">
                  <text>nl</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812334">
                <text>RHC-144_Termaat_DOC_1952-10-24-Security-clearance-for-work-379</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812335">
                <text>Detroit Air Regional Office</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812336">
                <text>1952-10-24</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812337">
                <text>Termaat Authorization for visit</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812338">
                <text>Authorization for Pieter Termaat to visit Grand Rapids, Michigan as a contract employee of Touche, Niven, Bailey &amp; Smart. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812339">
                <text>Dutch</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="812340">
                <text>Netherlands</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="812341">
                <text>Emigration and immigration</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812342">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/719"&gt;Adriana B. and Peter N. Termaat collection (RHC-144)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812344">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812345">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812346">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="812347">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1032970">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54665" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58936">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d9b1510d765e575b2b7990953d1a7e31.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1c6c8b9050b13e67119e457e42f23bdf</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1007768">
                    <text>MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES
CITY OF DETROIT

MAYOR
Coleman A. Young

CITY COUNCIL
Maryann Mahaffey, President
Gil Hill, President Pro Tern
Keith Butler
Clyde Cleveland
Barbara-Rose Collins
David Eberhard
Nicholas Hood
Jack Kelley
Mel Ravitz

PLANNING DEPARTMENT

•

Ronald J. Hewitt, Director
Daniel N. Lewis, Deputy Di rec.tor

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN_DF POLICIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS

,s
~

I.

INTRODUCTION
100
101

II.

I-1
I-4

CITY-WIDE POLICIES
201
202
203
204
205

III.
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311

~
~

Introduction to Master Plan............
Record of Changes to Master Plan •••.•.

IV.

Social Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Economic Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . .
Physical Development ..•..•..•......•..
Intergovernmental Relations .....•.•.•.
Future Land Use Plan . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

II-1
II-36
II-49
II-90
II-103

URBAN AREAS POLICIES

Introduction to Urban Areas ....•.•....
Central Business District ...........•.
East

................................. .

East Central . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Near Northwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . .
North . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Northeast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Northwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Riverfront . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Southwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
West .•••••••••••..••••..••.•..••••..••

Woodward . . • . • • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . .

III-1
III-2
III-20
III-41
III-60
III-74
III-86
III-103
III-122
III-123
III-145
III-158

DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS

401
402
403

Land Use Definitions &amp; Standards ..... .
Trafficways Definitions &amp; Standards .. .
Zoning Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IV-1
IV-10
IV-15

APPENDIX
A.

Index to Master Plan

A-1

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

INTRODUCTION

ARTICLE 100
INTRODUCTION

SHORT TITLE:

This document shall be known and may be cited as the DETROIT
MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES.
CHARTER PROVISIONS RELATED TO MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES:

In November, 1973, the citizens of the City of Detroit
approved the adoption of a new City Charter which restructured
government to make it more responsive and effective.
Many
changes were made and innovations introduced that were to
affect the planning process. The Preamble and Declaration of
Rights section, being the first section of the Charter, set
the tone and standard for all that followed. The adoption of
the Detroit Comprehensive Plan (Master Plan of Policies) was
intended to be one of the primary mechanisms to carry out the
intent of the Charter, especially as expressed in the Preamble
and Rights sections. The Detroit Comprehensive Plan (Master
Plan of Policies) was defined as an integral part of the
planning and decision-making process affecting the social,
economic, and physical welfare of the City.
THE MASTER PLANNING PROCESS:

The research and writing of this Master Plan of Policies was
done by the City of Detroit's Planning Department, within
guidelines set by the Mayor. Numerous persons were contacted,
both in the public and private sectors, and numerous meetings
were attended.
A number of preliminary meetings were held
with citizens in every portion of the City.
In addition, copies of the Master Plan of Policies were
distributed to all Detroit public libraries and to numerous
civic organizations, government agencies and neighborhood
groups.
Responses are incorporated into this Plan where
appropriate.
The continuous input of Detroit citizens into
the Master Plan process was envisioned by the City Charter
and formalized in an annual updating process outlined in
Section 8-102:
Periodic Review.
This provision emphasizes
both the desirability for input from citizens and the
3/90

I-1

�INTRODUCTION

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES
necessity
process.

for

change

that

is inherent

in

the Master

Plan

' rn a larger sense, this Master Plan of Policies is not just
a document but a process of which the document is one part.
The document's role is to reassess past and projected policies
and actions in the light of a long-range perspective.
It is
a taking of bearings, a pause of community self-assessment,
along the path of a continuing journey. There is a continual
need to replan.

PURPOSE:
The Master Plan is intended to give stability and a sense of
direction, but also deliberately intended to allow flexible
and realistic responses to changes in public needs, to
unexpected opportunities, and to unforeseen social and
economic changes.
It is intended to suggest preferable
directions.
The Master Plan of Policies is an advocacy document that
articulates the policy position of the City of Detroit to the
private sector, to other government agencies, and to the world
at large.
The Plan also suggests possible strategies and
programs that will help to implement a particular policy.
The Master Plan is intended to provide a policy framework that
will guide the development of more programmatic and more
specific plans such as the five-year Capital Agenda, Community
Development Area Plans,
Department budgets, and zoning
regulations among other things.

SUMMARY OF POLICIES:
Taken altogether, the policies set forth in this document
cover a wide range of issues.
They attempt to address the
major concerns of the City of Detroit, such as the need to
stabilize the level of population, the need to diversify the
economic base, the need to train and retrain workers for
future jobs, and the need to reinvest in underutilized
facilities
and
infrastructure.
Finally,
the policies
recognize the leadership function which the City of Detroit
plays and has played traditionally within the southeastern
Michigan region. The problems of development faced by Detroit
today will likely become the problems in vast areas of the
region tomorrow. The ability of Detroit to meet development
challenges successfully is a gain for the entire region and
for the State of Michigan.
3/90

I-2

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC~ES

INTRODUCTION

MASTER PLAN ORGANIZATION:
The Master Plan of Policies is divided into chapters and
further subdivided into articles. The two main chapters are
City-Wide Policies and Urban Areas Policies.
City-Wide Policies includes all policies and suggested methods
for implementation that apply to the City of Detroit as a
whole.
Also the City-Wide Existing Land Use map and Future
Land Use and Trafficways map are a part of this chapter.
Urban Areas Policies treat specific geographic areas of the
City and the policies which apply to those areas.
An index
map to the geographic areas is provided to facilitate locating
the desired area and policies.
Finally, a chapter dealing with definitions and technical
standards is included as well as a chapter containing useful
background information.

3/ 90

I-3

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

INTRODUCTION

ARTICLE 101
RECORD OF MASTER PLAN CHANGES

3/90

I-4

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIG_IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

ARTICLE 201
SOCIAL GOALS, POLICIES, AND STRATEGIES

INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL POLICIES

To implement the intent of the Preamble, Declaration of
Rights, and Planning Process sections of the 197 4 City of
Detroit Charter, the following general Master Plan social
goals and policies should ( 1) be used to analyze existing
policy statements for completeness and comprehensiveness, and
also (2) be used as a tool for the formulation of new policy
proposals for major program areas and major projects.
The basic idea of these following social policies for Detroit
is to help maintain positive neighborhood and family
environments that will support a productive, informed, and
concerned citizenry and community. Some of the policies speak
to the eliminating of factors that hurt the Detroit community,
such as limited educational achievement, drug dependency, and
lack of job opportunity.
The policies also make clear that a socially healthy community
is not the responsibility of government alone but everyone
shoulders a portion of the work to be done.
This involves
churches, neighborhood associations, block clubs, schools, and
civic associations.
The quality of Detroit's social environment has a powerful
impact on the stability of households and thus on the
stability of the level of population in the City.
It is the
aim of these policies to improve the quality of Detroit I s
social environment and to make Detroit a more attractive place
for people wishing to live and raise their families here.
The policies herein address a wide range of social needs and
pertain to areas where, in some cases, the City has no direct
control. Nevertheless, the City of Detroit must do all in its
power to serve its people's needs and to articulate and
advocate those needs whenever necessary.

3/90

II-1

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

EDUCATION POLICIES
POLICY 201-1: Continual education. Recognize that in today's
society good education is an essential preparation for all
aspects of life, that education must be continual throughout
an individual's life, and that many institutions, not just the
school system, do or could contribute to the education
process.
METHODS:

Increasing public awareness of the multiple purposes of
education, the continual need for it, and the diverse
potential sources of learning.
Emphasizing the school system as a primary component of
the
education
process
while
incorporating
other
appropriate components.
Working for increased use of the media as instruments
for public education.
POLICY 201-2: Educational environment.
Insure that there is
a safe and secure environment conducive to the learning
process in the schools, and that pupils have adequate
opportunities to have the good nutrition, general good health,
and supportive social services necessary to enable them to
learn at an optimum level.
METHODS:

Encouraging the schools to develop and enforce more
evenly and consistently a student code of conduct that
students and faculty perceive as safe, equitable, and
beneficial.
Enforcing rules and regulations that isolate rowdy and
intimidating members of the community from the student
body.
Utilizing influential members of the community to stress
the importance of education to students and provide role
models on a personal contact basis.
Encouraging the schools to assign early morning patrol
shifts to monitor the arrival of students and staff to
prevent assaults and thefts; developing means such as
CCTV, alarms, nontransparent doorways, etc., to prevent
3/90

II-2

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

unauthorized entry to school facilities; increasing
school security personnel; increasing community patrol
and block club watch groups; establishing a high school
student security apprentice program.
Developing or improving programs to educate parents and
the community to be more instrumental in the primary and
secondary educational process.
Encouraging parents to
make home .' more conducive to and supportive of their
children's learning.
Reinforcing and improving programs intended to correct
or improve conditions that make learning difficult for
individual pupils;
developing
new programs,
where
necessary.
Encouraging the reinstatement of school community agents
specifically charged with the task of working to improve
the immediate community in which the school is located.
POLICY 201-3: Quality education.
Insure that the quality of
instruction in the schools is the best available; utilizing
state-of-the-art methods and equipment.
METHODS:

Encouraging the schools to hire the most competent
teachers available,
teachers well-qualified in the
subject matter they teach, and with dedication to
assisting students to learn.
Insist that teachers
continually upgrade their knowledge and skills.
Encouraging the schools to require teachers to keep
abreast of the latest teaching methods and equipment,
and to teach about the implications of the latest
important technological innovations.
Encouraging the schools to develop diverse pay scales
that can adjust to changing demand in key teaching areas.
Working to increase the length of the school day and
year, to decrease class sizes and teachers' extra duties,
and increase teacher salaries with rewards for excellence
in teaching.
Encouraging the schools to establish a teacher evaluation
system that rewards superior teachers, encourages average
3/90

II-3

�SOCIAL POLICIES

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

teachers
to
improve,
inadequate teachers.

and

improves

or

terminates

Encouraging the schools to develop liaisons with private
enterprise that might lead to the acquisition of various
state-of-the-art equipment.
POLICY 201-4: Basic competency. Encourage policies that will
keep the dropout rate from high school as low as possible, and
insure that those completing their secondary education have
achieved a basic degree of competency in the skills required
for everyday living and the skills necessary to compete in the
job market.
METHODS:
Requiring individuals to pass basic competency tests.
Encouraging schools to motivate all students and help
reduce dropout rates.
Creating alternative programs for those students unable
to cope with the traditional environment.
Providing
special
handicapped.

programs

for

the

gifted

and

Improving marketing of the vocational-technical schools.
Providing for the continued monitoring of the job market
to determine trends in occupations and to determine which
occupational skills may be needed.
Improving liaisons with the business community to provide
for on-the-job skill development, access to entry level
jobs, and to monitor occupational trends.
POLICY 201-5: Adult education.
Insure that the educational
system offers opportunities for adults to acquire the skills
needed for functional day-to-day living as well as the everchanging job market.
METHODS:
Utilizing the existing
adults in basic skills.

3/90

educational

network

to

train

II-4

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

Developing programs with
education to employees.

employers

SOCIAL POLICIES

to

of fer

remedial

Utilizing the new vocational/technical centers for adults
and youth.
POLICY 201-6: Post-secondary education system.
Encourage a
post-secondary education system that makes excellent education
available to all who are qualified in the community, educates
students to fulfill their personal potential as well as to
staff the businesses and institutions of the area, advances

basic knowledge and provides research for the private and
public sectors of the community, and contributes to an
attractive and dynamic urban environment.
METHODS:

Urging that scholarship programs and other financial
assistance for the qualified and needy student be
maintained.
Encouraging the universities to extend the outreach of
their programs to satellite locations within the City,
e.g., the work place.
Encouraging post-secondary institutions to provide for
the continued monitoring of the job market to determine
trends in occupations.
Developing a coordinative mechanism among industry,
government, and academic institutions to encourage
exchange of ideas and staff to increase the practical
relevancy of what is taught and its applications.
Encouraging colleges and universities to identify and
design university research that would help government
and industry as well as advance basic knowledge.
Encouraging universities t6 offer to students majoring
in science or mathematics auxiliary teacher certification
programs.
Regulating private vocational schools to encourage high
quality relevant training.

3/90

II-5

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

POLICY 201-7: Multi-faceted education.
Encourage education
programs which educate the whole person, that help the
individual toward personal fulfillment, and instill selfdiscipline and responsibility.
METHODS:
Encouraging programs to educate how the mind and body
work, how they can be nurtured, and how to become
socially productive.
Encouraging students to perform community service as a

way of nurturing social skills.
Promoting the concepts and training of the "liberating
education", i.e., developing critical awareness, skills
of
inquiry
and
analysis,
and
self-assurance
and
independence.
Encouraging the availability of enrichment programs for
adults.
POLICY 201-8: Education - culture and values. Encourage all
students, from an early age, to develop a value system that
upholds the general ideals of society.
METHODS:
Stressing the importance of the family unit as the basic
structural element of society.
Impressing upon young adults from an early age
responsibilities of having and raising children.
Teaching youngsters about drugs, alcohol,
futility of criminal behavior and values.

the

the ultimate

Developing the student's sense of ethics about work,
honesty, and being productive, useful members of society.
Utilizing positive, inspiring examples and role models
to demonstrate the pleasures in a life of honest work,
development of skills, achievement, family, community
and wholesome recreation, even at a modest level of
income and wealth.

3/90

II-6

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

LIBRARY POLICIES
POLICY 201-9: Financial support for public libraries.
Support increasing and stabilizing financial support for the
public library system.
METHODS:

Assuring S~ate support of the costs of the Main Library.
Encouraging
system.

citizen

support

groups

for

the

Library

Reducing financial costs from loss of unreturned or
damaged books by implementing the local misdemeanor
ordinance.
POLICY 201-10: Technological innovations in library services.
Encourage use of the latest technological innovations in the
operations and delivery of services by the library system to
the public.
METHODS:

Encouraging the library system to implement the longrange plan and budget for phasing in technological
improvements.
Encouraging the
contributions.

system

to

seek

grants

and

in-kind

Encouraging public libraries to provide training and
access to computers; access to public domain programs;
develop connections for home computers to information
systems; make use of cable and public television; expand
use of bookmobiles, borrowing of tapes and records,
including video tapes; and, aid the public in accessing
university and private information sources generally.
RECREATION, ARTS AND CULTURE POLICIES

POLICY 201-11:
Leisure time.
Recognize the importance of
leisure time activities for mental, physical, and social
health, and for the development of human potential; and,
educate for the self-awareness and leisure skills necessary
for life-long constructive uses of leisure.
3/90

II-7

�SOCIAL POLICIES

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIG_IES

METHODS:

Working
leisure
person.

with the educational system to establish a
education program for developing the whole

Establishing computerized directories free to users
showing location and hours of popular and traditional
leisure opportunities.
Providing leisure counselors
and as field workers.

in multi-service centers

Developing and promoting mass media programs supportive
of whole person development.
Developing more community service volunteer programs.
Better interrelating leisure with other human service
systems for joint sharing.
POLICY
201-12:
Public
outdoor
recreation.
Provide
opportunities for public outdoor recreation activities in
proportion to population density and to the availability of
alternative (non-City) services.
METHODS:

Retaining and improving existing recreation land.
Where feasible, consolidating small inadequate parcels
into larger, more functional sites.
Acquiring
and
developing
new
underserviced areas of the City.

recreation

land

in

Insuring that adequate maintenance funds are available
for new recreational property and facility acquisitions.
Acquiring public easements where outright purchase of
land is not feasible.
POLICY
201-13:
Public
indoor
recreation.
Provide
opportunities for public indoor recreation activities in
proportion to population density and to the availability of
alternative (non-City) services.

3/90

II-8

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC.IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

METHODS:
Providing indoor recreation
operations funds permit.

space,

as

capital

and

Renovating
recreation
facilities
to
increase
accessibility for handicapped persons and to protect the
health and safety of users.
Insuring that programs are offered to all age groups of
both genders in a safe and secure setting.
Providing recreation programs for
groups, including senior citizens,
mentally handicapped persons.

special population
and physically and

Continuing to broaden the functions of recreation and
community centers to provide a multi-service approach to
meeting the human service needs of all age groups and
populations.
POLICY 201-14: Public parks and recreation:
coordination.
Improve coordination efforts between City government and nonCity agencies providing recreation services to City youth,
seniors, and handicapped.
METHODS:
Increasing coordination between the City administration
and the Detroit Public Schools.
Converting surplus private as well as public properties
to recreation uses.
Strengthening coordination between the public and
private non-profit sector providers.

the

Continuing
to
coordinate
between
City
recreation
providers and arts agencies and facilities for cultural
arts expansion.
Establishing greater coordination between the City and
State handicapped and community placement recreation
services.
Developing
joint publicity programs
apprising
community of the various recreation opportunities.
3/90

the

II-9

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC..IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

,POLICY 201-15:
Financial support for public parks and
recreation. Increase financial support from non-City sources
for public parks and recreation programs.
METHODS:

Supporting efforts to increase State and Federal funding.
Increasing City revenues by use of fees for service and
concessionaires.
Working with developers in joint ventures.
Expanding contributions to City parks and recreational
programs from private sources.
POLICY 201-16: Arts and culture:
participation.
Increase
exposure to, and participation in, traditional art activities
by new audiences.
METHODS:

Supporting and increasing student, senior, and other
special audience transportation to centers of traditional
culture and related cultural events.
Fostering arts and awareness of local history.
Encouraging the availability for school-related programs
of
professional
artists
and
historians
and
the
traditional arts; support public exhibitions, concerts,
plays, and recitations in nontraditional places.
Encouraging use of all types of media in promoting
awareness and education in the arts and local history.
201-17:
Ethnic and neighborhood arts.
Encourage
ethnic art activities and neighborhood arts events.

POLICY

METHODS:

Encouraging
festivals.

neighborhood

ethnic

Reinforcing smaller ethnic centers
activities on a year-round basis.

3/90

and
and

arts/crafts
encouraging

II-10

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Continuing and increasing support for ethnic cultural
institutions.
Encouraging use of ethnic arts and architectural elements
in new building development.
Promoting art in public places.
Examining the feasibility of a special high school for
the visual and performing arts; strengthen the current
programs for the performing arts in the public schools.
Utilizing neighborhood theaters as cable programming feed
centers, providing neighborhood arts activities with a
broader audience.
POLICY 201-18: Historic preservation - significant buildings.
exceptionally
significant
individual
historic
buildings, especially those illustrating phases of Detroit's
history, and those which are meaningful to contemporary
Detroiters interested in the past history of their own or
other ethnic groups.
Preserve

METHODS:

Preserving prominent and excellent examples of various
historic building styles.
Identifying people, events, locations, and structures
that are significant to the City's history,
and
preserving buildings, placing plaques, or recording by
photography and representative artifacts to preserve that
heritage.
Recognizing places of historic events for a sense of
heritage among residents and to make the City more
interesting and understandable to visitors.
Making sure the relevant local history is recorded and
presented in museums and schools.
Recognizing and preserving the multi-ethnicity of the
City as it relates to the architecture, major events,
and contributions of the City residents.
POLICY 201-19: _A_r_t_i_s_t_s_'__w_o_r_k_i_n~g'-_a_n_d__l_i_v_1_·n__.._9__c_o_n=d_i_t_i_o_n_s_.
Facilitate improvements in artists' working and living
conditions .

•

3/90

II-11

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

METHODS:

Fostering the establishment of low cost health and legal
services for artists and their families.
Encouraging the legal conversion of lofts into artists
studios.
Encouraging groups of artists to develop and organize
joint exhibits and marketing outlets.
·~

Supporting the establishment of centers for drama, dance,
music, and other appropriate arts.
Establishing an artists'
co-op,
owned by artists
themselves, for the purchase and rental of supplies,
materials, and equipment.
Establishing an artist access media center
services and equipment.

to provide

Encouraging the services businesses to hire artists on
a part-time basis.

POLICY 201-20:
Financial support for arts and culture.
Foster and insure financial support for the arts, with the
aim of rationalizing, stabilizing, and expanding Detroit's
already established but fragmented arts and culture industry.
METHODS:

Supporting efforts to increase Federal funding
arts.

to the

Supporting the reestablishment of public service arts
employment programs.
Supporting increases in State support and Detroit
representations for the arts and cultural institutions
in Detroit.
Encouraging
funding.

the

development

of

cooperation

for

arts

Encouraging new private and corporate sponsorships for
the arts .

•

3/90

II-12

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Examining the current fee structure of City museums and
zoo to maximize revenues.
Encouraging private support groups for all museums and
zoo.
Helping foster the recognition by the private sector that
the arts and culture make noteworthy contributio ns to the
daily economy of the City.
Exploring the possibility of
cultural investment.

tax

incentive

bonds

for

Providing developmental assistance for the reforming of
a
Detroit-based
recording
industry:
aid
in
the
development of other arts and cottage industries.
Encouraging the economic growth of the non-profit arts
sector.
Providing developmental assistance to arts organizations
in setting up enterprises.
Encouraging the development of booking, promotion, and
arts marketing enterprises.
Promoting arts and cultural activities for tourism.
Encouraging and providing support to Detroit artists and
arts organizations who are eligible to apply for funding.
POLICY 201-21:
Natural heritage.
Recognize the role of
humans in relation to their natural heritage and foster
conditions that will insure this heritage for generations to
come.
METHODS:

Repairing or replacing the Zoological Park exhibits and
training staff, applying current knowledge of animal
preservation and propagation.
Strengthening educational services at the Zoological
Park, including construction of an educational center
and interpretive signage.
Increasing marketing of natural
available in City facilities.
3/90

heritage

resources

II-13

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC..IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Promoting public awareness programs in ecology and our
natural heritage.
POLICY 201-22:
Private non-profit recreation services:
voluntary/charitable agencies.
Encourage increases
in
recreation services provided by the voluntary/charitable
agencies in areas now underserviced by them.
METHODS:
Strengthening coordination between recreation services
providers for efficient and equitable allocation of
resources.
Encouraging the establishment of new recreation services
or the expansion of recreation services in high youth,
low-income areas of the City.
Assisting in the promotion of programs and the recruiting
of volunteers to lead groups.
Supporting
the
retention of
non-profit
recreation
agencies.
POLICY 201-23:
Private non- rofit recreation services:
employers and/or unions.
Encourage employers and or unions
to provide their employees with convenient recreation services
and an esthetically pleasing work environment.
METHODS:
Encouraging
businesses
recreation programs.

to

Insuring that the City is a
establishing fitness programs.

establish

fitness

model

employers

for

and
in

Encouraging owners of large buildings to provide some
common space for fitness programs.
Encouraging landscaping, plazas, and landscapes in the
work environment.
Encouraging "quality of workplace" conditions.
POLICY 201-24:
Private non-profit recreation services:
senior residential and community placement.
Encourage
operators of senior residential and community placement
facilities to provide recreation programming for their
residents.
3/90

II-14

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

METHODS:

Pressing
for
legislation
requiring
that
senior
residential centers provide recreation services for their
residents.
Developing a cadre of professionals to train volunteers
to visit and provide programs at senior residential
centers.
Obtaining funding from the State to finance some of the
recreational services needed.
POLICY 201-25:
Private non-profit recreation services:
community
recreation
associations.
Encourage
the
establishment
of
locally-supported
community
recreation
associations.
METHODS:

Developing and distributing an instructions package for
establishing
community
recreation
associations
and
working with communities to help them establish them.
HEALTH POLICIES
POLICY 201-26:
Protection of health.
Take measures to
protect residents, workers, and visitors from threats to their
health in an urban environment such as Detroit that contains
various health hazards with the potential to kill, injure, and
disable individuals and substantially affect the health of the
entire community.
METHODS:

Lessening the potential for
traffic accidents and
reducing the likelihood of death and injury by improving
trafficways.
Lessening the demand on trafficway systems by encouraging
the use and improvement of public transportation.
Reducing violent deaths including accidents, homicides,
and suicides by encouraging alcohol and drug abuse
prevention through education.

3/90

II-15

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Eliminating environmental hazards through the continued
monitoring of air and water, adequate sewage disposal,
and requiring auto safety and emission inspection.
Updating regulations on the
chemicals.

use of pesticides and other

Updating regulations on the transportation of hazardous
chemicals.
Encouraging health and sex education programs in the
school system with emphasis on communicable diseases such
as Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
POLICY 201-27:
Prevention of expensive medical treatment.
Direct more health care financial resources toward preventive
efforts which reduce the necessity for expensive in-patient
medical treatment.
METHODS:
Encouraging inter-institutional cooperation to eliminate
duplication of resources.
Supporting legislative action
control capital expenditures.

requiring

Supporting legislation requiring
annual increases in spending.

hospitals

hospitals

Encouraging changes in insurance plans
increased consumer awareness of costs.

to

to

to

contain

stimulate

Encouraging the implementation of stricter measures to
eliminate financial abuse of prepaid medical/health
programs.
Encouraging the enactment of legislation to allow health
care coverage of the unemployed by Medicaid.
Recognizing the relationship between health status and
socio-economic conditions of residents.
Implementing those policies and strategies described
elsewhere in this document which are directed toward
improved socio-economic conditions of Detroit residents.

3/90

II-16

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICj:ES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Continuing Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and
Treatment (EPSDT) program sponsored to assure that those
receiving public assistance have access to preventive
health care and early treatment.
Encouraging the development and
implementation of
community heal th education programs to inform people
about health, illness, disability, and ways to improve
their own health.
Supporting the strengthening of community mental health
programs.
Developing and implementing nonmoralistic educational
programs, particularly directed at young people, which
inform of the consequences and dangers of irresponsible
use of alcohol and drugs.
Encouraging industry involvement in health maintenance
and promotion such as through exercise programs and
provision of fitness facilities.
Urging public schools to continue public immunization
programs.
Urging public schools to
programs in the schools.

continue

health

protection

POLICY 201-28: Prevention and treatment of drug and alcohol
abuse.
Encourage programs that help to prevent drug and
alcohol abuse, especially among young people, and programs
that provide the necessary treatment for those people wishing
to relinquish drug or alcohol dependency.
METHODS:

Encouraging programs in the school system that teach
youngsters self-esteem and let them know the potential
dangers of drug or alcohol abuse.
Encouraging the formation of support groups such as
Alcoholics Anonymous to assist those who need continued
reinforcement after treatment for drug or alcohol
dependency.
Providing a variety of types and levels of treatment for
drug users.
3/90

II-17

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIClES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Continuing those existing drug treatment centers operated
by the City.
Providing drug education programs using funds acquired
through impoundment.
POLICY 201-29: Mental health. Urge State agencies to review
the results of cost-cutting efforts and develop prog r ams when
they are needed.
METHODS:

Urging State action to develop improved alternatives to
deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill, particularly
for the existing and potential homeless population.
POLICY 201-30:
Health system.
Recognize the necessity for
accessible and available medical resources for Detroit
residents, and further recognize the labor intensive nature
of the health care industry.
Detroit should remain the
regional center for medical care and should be established as
a center for research and development of medical technology.
METHODS:

Supporting efforts to enhance the Detroit Medical Center
and discouraging the trend toward hospital proliferation.
Support accessibility of health facilities for veterans
in the Detroit metropolitan area by the relocation of the
Veterans Administration Hospital to the Medical Center.
Making all efforts to attract medical research and
development activities to the Medical Center.
POLICY 201-31:
Health care.
Support those measures which
assure access to and delivery of comprehensive health care to
every resident.
METHODS:

Encouraging home health care and day care as a viable,
cost-containing alternative to in-patient care.
Supporting
strong
enforcement
affecting communicable diseases.

3/90

of

public

statutes

II-18

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIG_IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Aggressively acting to treat and isolate if necessary
diagnosed cases of communicable and infectious diseases
including Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).
Intensifying programs aimed at rodent, animal, and lead
control.
Supporting mobile health teams to treat the homeless.
Requiring ppen access to medical facilities in the City
for all City residents and their physicians.
POLICY 201-32:
Physical and mental well-being.
Encourage
and support active measures to upgrade and maintain high
levels of physical and mental well-being of the individuals
of the community.
METHODS:

Treating mental health services as a complement to and
coordinated with physical heal th services.
Improving
coordination of community health services and facilities
with other social services in the City would be a
beginning step in establishing a more effective network
of helping services.
PUBLIC PROTECTION POLICIES
POLICY 201-33: Police Department Image. Continue to promote
the image of the Police Department as an integral part of the
community, representing social order and the general wellbeing of the community.
METHODS:

Increasing police presence and visibility throughout the
City for other than criminal activities.
Increasing Police Athletic League (PAL) activities.
Initiating Police Department involvement in schools.
Encouraging the participation and assistance of the media
in forming opinions relative to the role of police in
improving the general quality of life and image of the
community.
Accentuating to the Police Department personnel that
their role is to help citizens, not just fight crime.
3/90

II-19

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

POLICY 201-34: Efficiency of the Police Department. Maintain
an efficient Police Department capable of responding to and
preventing criminal activity.
METHODS:

Increasing police presence and visibility.
Concentrating efforts to rid our community of the career
criminals.
Actively promoting cooperative crime prevention efforts
between government, the private sector, and citizens.
Increasing efforts to organize neighborhood-watch type
groups and other crime prevention programs.
Seeking funds for
justice system.

public protection and

the

er iminal

Implementing fully the Precinct Reorganization Plan to
equalize workloads and improve efficiency.
Investigating and adopting proven technological advances
to improve police service.
POLICY 201-35:
Integrated Police Department.
Maintain a
well-integrated Police Department, providing services in a
nondiscriminatory fashion.
METHODS:

Continuing the court approved affirmative action policy.
Continuing to promote and recruit superior applicants.
Continuing to stress police nondiscriminatory attitudes
toward the public.
POLICY 201-36:
Community participation in crime prevention.
Increase the participation of the community
in crime
prevention programs.
METHODS:

Expanding on Detroit's leadership role by encouraging
neighborhood revitalization strategies that incorporate
both physical and social er ime prevention techniques.
3/90

II-20

�~-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

The primary objective must be to reduce the fear of crime
in our city.
Recognizing the importance of the media in forming
opinions, encouraging the media to be more sensitive to
crime issues. Aim to reduce fear of crime and increase
the community's sense that social order exists.
Encouraging neighborhood business expansion in the City
through the use of tax incentives and other methods.
POLICY 201-37:
Drug enforcement.
Discourage and eliminate
the production,
importation, distribution,
or sale of
narcotics in Detroit.
Discourage the availability of all
items used in the manufacture and use of narcotics.
METHODS:

Supporting efforts of the Federal government to halt the
narcotics trade at the national and international level.
Increasing surveillance and arrest of local drug dealers
and their employees.
Continuing programs of arresting drug users.
POLICY 201-38: Fire protection: focusing on prevention and
education. Continue to protect human life and property from
the perils of fire, focusing on fire prevention awareness and
education.
METHODS:

Implementing a computer system capable of providing
information about the flammable or hazardous contents of
structures in areas.
Continuing to conduct an effective educational program
dealing with fire prevention.
Encouraging the
extinguishers.

use of smoke detectors

and home

fire

Encouraging continued Federal financial participation in
local fire protection efforts.
Continuing to maintain a Fire Department that is capable
of responding effectively to all fire emergencies.
3/90

II-21

�~r

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Continuing.to insure that residential units are escapable
in emergency situations.
Encouraging the introduction of more fire retardant
material in buildings and elsewhere and introducing selfextinguishing cigarettes.
Promoting efforts to eliminate the willful act o f false
fire alarms.
Continuing to conduct analysis of fires
that occur along with their underlying causes.
POLICY 201-39:
Fire:
code enforcement and elimination of
fire hazards. Enforce all appropriate code requirements and
develop programs to provide for the elimination of structural
fire hazards.
METHODS:
Continuing to conduct regular code inspection programs.

Emphasizing fire prevention through public
inspection, regulation, and incentives.

education

Developing programs that provide for the elimination of
structural fire hazards.
Making a comprehensive reexamination of all legislation
dealing with fire protection.

Encouraging property maintenance practices to eliminate
the accumulation of refuse and combustibles.
POLICY 201-40: Additional prison space.
prison space to incarcerate felons.

Provide additional

METHODS:

Giving an
offenders.

appropriate

prison

sentence

for

repeat

Promoting support of additional prison space.
Finding alternatives to the Emergency Powers Act which
reduces prison sentences as the result of overcrowding.
POLICY 201-41:
Juvenile court system.
effectiveness of the juvenile court system.

3/90

Improve

the

II-22

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI!;_IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

METHODS:
Making prevention the primary goal in treating potential
juvenile offenders.
Remanding juveniles demonstrating a pattern of violent
criminal activity to the adult court system.
Other thah for status offenses, requiring juveniles
charged w{ th a er ime to appear with their parents in
Juvenile Court.
Including restitution and community service in juvenile
sentences.
Holding parents accountable
children.
Providing adequate
offenders.

for

detention

the actions

facilities

for

of

their

juvenile

POLICY 201-42: Educational system and criminality.
Support
and improve the educational system to help prevent growth of
criminality.
METHODS:

Training
teachers,
counselors,
and
volunteers
recognize students who are undergoing difficulty
learning or coping.

to
in

Building support programs into the school system and
other institutions to counteract unstable family life
and negative role models.
Using schools
development.

as

a

building

block

for

neighborhood

Encouraging increased funding of local education through
a more broad-based,equitable tax structure.
Actively promoting stronger linkages between the Police
Department and the educational system.
Fostering Head Start and child abuse prevention programs.

3/90

II-23

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

POLICY 201-43:
Anti-crime legislation.
Investigate
utilize Federal and State anti-crime legislation.

and

METHODS:

Actively seeking anti-crime grants to provide for more
police officers in the neighborhoods and increased
citizen involvement.
Promoting efforts to include social and economic programs
as crime prevention measures.
Making comprehensive examination of the effectiveness of
all anti-crime legislation.
POLICY 201-44: Economic factors and their effect on criminal
behavior.
Recognize that unemployment and/or the lack of
opportunities for economic advancement are particularly acute
for many Detroiters.
METHODS:

Convincing businesses and manufacturers to locate jobs
in Detroit.
Carrying out
development.

the

Master

Plan

policies

for

economic

POLICY 201-45: Prevention of arson. Remove dilapidated and
vacant structures that are prime targets of malicious fires
and arson.
METHODS:

Identifying arson-prone
special programs.

areas

and

target

appropriate

Boarding or demolishing vacant or vandalized structures.
Encouraging immediate demolition of dangerous buildings.
Eliminating
improper
combustibles .

•

3/90

dumping

and

open

storage

of

II-24

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC_JES

SOCIAL POLICIES

,POLICY 201-46:
Arson penalties.
Eliminate incentives and
encourage severe penalties against those engaging in arson.
METHODS:
Working with insurance companies to identify fires caused
by arson, thereby invalidating insurance claims and
reducing arson-for-profit.
Identifying arson-prone areas and targeting appropriate
special programs.
Investigating measures that would lead to
sentencing for persons convicted of arson.

mandatory

Educating the criminal justice network to the social and
economic damage caused by arson and to the need for
stronger sanctions.
Instilling values in the citizenry that will reduce arson
stemming from malicious acts.
POLICY 201-47:
Response to disaster.
Improve the capacity
of the City of Detroit to respond to any kind of natural or
man-made disaster.
METHODS:
Maintaining and updating adopted City emergency plans.
Acquiring additional communications
Emergency Operations Center.

equipment

for

the

Improving the City warning siren system.
Continuing the periodic training exercises for designated
City emergency personnel.
Conducting an expanded education program for departments
and for the general public.
Maintaining
liaison with other
State and
Federal
agencies with "emergency-related" responsibilities.
SOCIAL SERVICES POLICIES
POLICY 201-48: Child, spouse, and parent abuse. Place a high
priority on the prevention of child, spouse, and parent abuse.
3/90

II-25

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIG_IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

,METHODS:

Putting a stronger emphasis on early detection of
children at risk or likely to be at risk with special
emphasis on infants because normal community surveillance
of infant abuse is difficult.
Providing
temporary
shelters
and
encouraging
the
availability of legal counsel for battered spou s es.
Developing programs to deal with parent abuse.
POLICY 201-49:
Consumer education. Continue to deliver the
educational and informational services necessary to enhance
the daily living conditions of the citizens of the City.
METHODS:

Processing
consumer
complaints
promptly,
providing
statistics on trends and information about new needs for
consumer protection and, in general, continuing to reduce
the incidence of consumer misspending and fraud against
consumers through consumer education and information.
POLICY 201-50:
Neighborhood self-help.
Actively support
neighborhood or community-based self-help organizations which
a r e
e n g a g i n g
i n
l o c a l
h o u s i n g
construction/conservation/rehabilitation efforts.
METHODS:

Encouraging clean-up, lot maintenance, and reuse projects
of all types which would contribute to improvements in
the neighborhood areas. Initiating City-supported smallscale neighborhood improvement projects for the purpose
of demonstrating the effectiveness of such efforts.
Supporting
neighborhood-based
housing
programs
providing them with a wider variety of services
expertise.

and
and

Promoting wider and increased publication of successful
neighborhood self-help initiatives.
Considering policies to bring about legal transfer of
ownership or management control from owners who abandon
or disinvest in their property to tenants.
3/90

II-26

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC,lES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Reviewing City housing programs to consider possible
revisions or new programs that will provide additional
financial resources.
Seeking financial and technical assistance to support
community-based neighborhood housing efforts.
Promoting and encouraging increased private initiatives
in City programs and community efforts.
Instituting an electronic data processing capability to
support neighborhood housing activities and communitybased organizations.
Providing new housing units for moderate income persons
using sweat equity and owner-builder concepts.
Considering establishing special zoning to provide
neighborhoods with more latitude and a larger tool
arsenal to enhance their own development and vitality.
Encouraging programs
for housing repair.

to develop do-it-yourself

skills

POLICY 201-51:
Neighborhood stabilization.
Use available
housing resources as feasible to stabilize and/or revitalize
neighborhood housing conditions and aid in reversing the
process of physical-economic decline occurring in some City
neighborhoods.
METHODS:

Finding ways to shorten the tax foreclosure process and
to shorten the period between housing abandonment and
measures to secure houses from vandalism.
Putting more
emphasis on the obligations of property owners to
maintain property.
Giving priority to funding neighborhood programs
generate continued community investment.

that

Working to improve the quality of repair contractors.
Providing accurate information, informed counselors, and
needed aid and advocacy services to City residents.

3/90

II-27

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Supporting efforts that will enable people with lower
incomes to remain in stable, viable, but nonexclusionary
City communities.
Encouraging increased public, private, and community
cooperation in neighborhood security efforts.
Advertising neighborhood stabilization/revitalization
efforts that are successful.
Encouraging
local
merchants
to
sponsor
community
activities and to maintain a close relationship with the
communities in which they are located.
POLICY 201-52:
Self-help for handicapped.
Assist
handicapped to become as self-sufficient as possible.

the

METHODS:

Developing
and
maintaining
public
buildings
and
facilities so as to facilitate the social, economic, and
physical mobility of the handicapped and physically
impaired.
Unless totally impractical, encouraging and requiring
private developers to make provisions for accessibility
by the handicapped and physically impaired members of
our society.
Mak-ing provisions for the employment of handicapped and
physically impaired persons in development projects.
Carrying out public functions in forums that provide full
accessibility to the handicapped and physically impaired.
Avoiding erecting barriers
that
inhibit
the
free
participation of the handicapped and physically impaired
members of the community.
POLICY 201-53:
Neighborhoods as supportive environment for
families.
Every viable neighborhood should have the highest
possible level of basic public services - clean water and air,
public safety protection, housing support (code, zoning, and
other ordinance enforcement), sewage and solid waste disposal,
street maintenance, traffic and parking control, public health
measures, transportation, education, etc.

3/90

II-28

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC__JES

SOCIAL POLICIES

METHODS:

Determining the level of community organization and
interaction with other entities at which the City can be
most effective in supporting the efforts of community
groups.
Providing technical assistance to neighborhood groups in
their efforts to relate to public and other agencies
around problems with services at the neighborhood level.
Providing
supporting
and
technical
assistance
to
community groups in identifying activities of a self-help
nature to improve the quality of life in their
neighborhoods.
Continuing and enhancing activities which place resources
at the disposal of community level organizations for
improvement of conditions.
Strengthening the neighborhood participation
City
agencies
in
technical
assistance,
mobilization, and use of existing resources.

level of
resource

Strengthening
neighborhood
level
commercial
establishments and assisting development of a productive
resident-commercial service relationship.
Continuing
to
advocate
the
interests
of
Detroit
neighborhoods at State and SEMCOG levels in dealing with
proposals which may result in the destabilizing of
Detroit neighborhoods.
POLICY 201-54: Social services to families and individuals.
Determine the exact size, characteristics, and location of
the population which is "at risk" in regard to adequate
income, housing, and neighborhood conditions.
External
negative pressures on families should be reduced to the
greatest degree possible.
METHODS:

Seeking resources and collaboration (universities, United
Community Services, et al) to develop and carry out a
sophisticated assessment of its overall conditions.

3/90

II-29

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIG__IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Involving
its
own
and
other
neighborhood
level
organizations and agencies in a continuation study in
targeted neighborhoods.
Studying local impact of cuts and changes in legislation
and regulation of Federal and State programs.
Defining ways in which negative trends and
impacts on people in Detroit can be lessened.

negative

Examining very closely the relationship between the
condition of "homelessness" in the City and the State's
II
program
of
deinsti tutionalization
of
stabilized"
mentally ill persons.
Seeking outside resources and collaboration to evaluate,
propose strategies, and resources for action in regard
to adequate social services.
Seeking and establishing more effective coordination and
planning such as United Community Services, schools, and
New Detroit in the area of the development of income and
the treatment of other social problems.
Evaluating use of City resources in terms of their
efficiency and effectiveness, the level of its commitment
to easing the impact of social problems, and the
determination of ways in which local government can be
most effective in its activities in the areas of:
influence; enlisting of highly skilled, capable private
resources (human and monetary); coordination; technical
assistance and financial support to skilled organizations
and agencies.
POLICY 201-55:

Non-traditional households.

Support housing

activities and programs engaged in providing adequate housing

and

support

services

to

meet

the

housing

needs

of

non-

traditional households.

METHODS:

Encouraging development of affordable and safe housing
needed by non-traditional households, with a supportive
environment for both adults and children.
Supporting
( SRO) .
3/90

efforts

to

improve

Single

Room

Occupancy

II-30

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Supporting efforts to provide support services needed by
non-traditional households.
Monitoring conversions of SRO buildings to apartments,
cooperatives, and condominiums that tend to displace SRO
occupants.
Supporting
efforts
to
provide
shared
housing
opportunit~es to non-traditional households which desire
it.

POLICY 201-56:
Services for the homeless.
Take action to
reduce homelessness and to provide effective and coordinated
services to the homeless.
METHODS:

Developing additional uni ts of transitional and permanent
housing units dedicated to the homeless.
Preserving current single-room occupancy buildings.
Establishing a clearly designated coordinator of services
to the homeless.
Supporting the development of a
center for homeless persons.

comprehensive service

Continuing to support agencies which provide services to
the homeless.
POLICY 201-57:
Prenatal care and parenting skills.
Every
expectant mother should have access to good prenatal and
follow-up care regardless of ability to pay.
METHODS:

Taking definite steps to determine the exact extent of
lack
of
prenatal
and
follow-up
care
and
cause
mobilization of resources and cooperative efforts to
combat in the areas of: infant health; teen pregnancies;
training
in parenting skills
(for
both parents);
continued formal education for teen parents; coping
skills for "at risk" parents (all ages and both parents)
of
infants;
youth
employment
(male
and
female);
strategies for involvement of both parents in the rearing
and protection of the child; child abuse.
3/90

II-31

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC..IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

POLICY 201-58:
Elementary school-age children and their
parents.
Provide adequate protection of the health and
welfare of this age group as a major deterrent to both future
social adjustment problems and the costly remedial measures
required to correct them.
METHODS:

Maintaining "community" is especially important at this
stage. These children are just beginning to move out of
the family circle and to be required to negotiate broader
systems (neighborhood and school, primarily) and to
discover the nature of "their community".
Lack of safe
passage in the neighborhoods between home and school
causes children to become more vulnerable to abuse from
persons
external
to
the
home,
in
addition
to
vulnerability in the home.
The protective aspect of
community is vital at this stage.
Providing expanded programming in recreation centers for
elementary and pre-adolescent age youngsters.
Including protection of elementary school-age children
in studies to determine exact conditions in Detroit in
areas of:
early childhood education and health status.
Including action against child abuse
crime prevention program.

in any concerted

Devising a definite plan for coordination of appropriate
City services and assigning responsibility for the
carrying out of the City's role.
Maintaining methods and relationships whereby the City
can be abreast of the status of the programs which do
exist in the City, determining gaps in accessibility,
and taking action at appropriate levels.
POLICY 201-59:
Adolescent population.
Provide adequate
protection of the health and welfare of this age group as a
major deterrent to both future social adjustment problems and
the costly remedial measures required to correct them.
METHODS:

Promoting neighborhood conservation.

3/90

II-32

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIG_IES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Promoting neighborhood and community atmosphere which is
protective of children and youth.
Promoting neighborhoods organized to be hospitable rather
than hostile to youth.
Publicly encouraging programs involving all of the
neighborhood and higher level mechanisms for positive
influence on youth, with involvement of the youth
themselves in design and implementation.
Local government should support the legislation for youth
as well as adult employment - including wide ranging
opportunities for voluntary work experiences.
Providing
local
government
support
for
equitable
financing
of
educational
institutions and
special
programs for the "at risk" population.
Finding ways to help prevent teenage suicides.
Provide adequate services to deal with those who run away
from home.
POLICY 201-60: Working parents. Encourage greater workplace
flexibility to accommodate the needs of working parents with
young children.
METHODS:

Encouraging employers to make scheduling adjustments in
the work place.
Encouraging assistance to workers in regard to child care
at or near work sites.
POLICY 201-61:
Independence for elderly persons in planning
and managing their own lives (incomes).
Elderly persons
should be assured of income and support adequate to meet their
basic needs.
METHODS:

Actively
promoting
development
of
wide
ranging
opportunities
for
retraining
and
reemployment
of
Detroit's large unemployed middle-aged work force.

3/90

II-33

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC~ES

SOCIAL POLICIES

Supporting legislation and other activities which protect
opportunities for employment of those elderly persons who
are able and desirous of working.
Providing active legislative support for changes in
Social Security laws which discriminate against women:
namely, the inability to benefit from their own Social
Security contribution independent of those of their
spouses and the 10-year marriage duration clause in
regard to divorced women.
POLICY 201-62:
Independent old age (health and mobility).
Services which assist elderly persons in achieving and
maintaining physical health and mobility should be available
and accessible without regard to economic status.
METHODS:

Promoting activities which encourage elderly persons in
achieving and maintaining physical health and mobility
should be available and accessible without regard to
economic status.
Continuing and increasing programs encouraging
nutrition and other health promoting activities.

good

Encouraging activities which emphasize training of health
professionals {including doctors)
in the field of
geriatrics, helping the aging population to maintain high
standards of health for the longest possible period of
time.
Encouraging programs which make
affordable for elderly persons.

adequate

health

care

Encouraging appropriate public health nursing, in-home
health care aide programs for the elderly, and day care
as a viable alternative to the more expensive in-patient
hospital and nursing care.
Assuring handicap accessible buildings.
Assuring transportation which is convenient and meets
special needs at low cost.
Involving elderly persons in the planning of programs to
serve their age group and neighborhoods.
3/90

II-34

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

SOCIAL POLICIES

POLICY 201-63: Independent old age. A coordinated network
of Social Services to older citizens should exist in the City,
with special emphasis on services to elderly persons with
special needs.
METHODS:

Coordinating appropriate City services with those
other agenciies providing services to the elderly.

of

Encouraging the efforts of agencies to bring about a
higher level of effectiveness nd efficiency through
coordination of their services.
Encouraging
programs
which
give
wide
ranging
opportunities
for
passing
on
of
values,
skills,
experiences from the senior generation to the younger.

3/90

II-35

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

ARTICLE 202
ECONOMIC GOALS, POLICIES, AND STRATEGIES

INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMIC POLICIES
The economy of
Detroit
has
long
been
based on
the
manufacturing of transportation vehicles and consumer durable
goods.
Detroit
industry has produced every type of
transportation vehicle from autos to aircraft, from steamships
to spaceships.
In the 1980's, however, Detroit's economic
base is experiencing a profound transformation: it is moving
from a reliance on manufacturing jobs toward an increased
emphasis on service-oriented jobs.
The economic policies set forth here recognize the importance
of the past as well as the future: they address both the
manufacturing sector and services sector and the challenge to
retrain and re-educate Detroit's labor force so that the
transition from past to future will benefit all workers. The
policies also recognize the increased participation of women
in the labor force and the many implications this has for
child-rearing practices and the social environment.
Finally, Detroit's closeness to Canada and its location on
the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Seaway is viewed as a very
positive economic factor.
The general economic climate of the community is the element
which allows the other needed social and physical improvements
to happen.
The economic policies are fundamental to the
future of Detroit. They are the foundation upon which other
kinds of development will build.
EMPLOYMENT POLICIES
POLICY 202-1:
Full employment for Detroit residents.
Continue to assign the highest priority to attaining full
employment for Detroit's residents.
METHODS:
Helping unemployed to plan better for their re-entry into
the work force.
3/90

II-36

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

Insuring adequate unemployment benefits, and encouraging
unemployed to get skill retraining when needed.
Recognizing workers' needs for security, predictability,
advancement, and quality work life.
Continuing realistic programs to attract new industry in
targeted areas.
Promoting incubation of new industry.
Balancing stability with growth.
Creating an environment attractive to business and industry
relative to taxes, services, education, and setting.
Promoting new services employment in selected areas.
Exploring shorter work weeks and
benefits of available jobs.

job sharing

to spread

Fostering entrepreneurship, solving credit and insurance
barriers.
When unemployment is high, increase public sector
especially rebuilding infrastructure.

jobs,

Encouraging support for youth corps.
Encouraging
City.

placement

of

job providing

institutions

in

Supporting tax credits for employing and training hard core
unemployed.
Seeking countercyclical funding f ram the Federal Government
to cities with the most severe business cycles.
POLICY 202-2:
Economic development planning and delivery
system.
Maintain an economic development planning and
delivery system at a level which will enable Detroit to (1)
make
enlightened
decisions
in
the
area
of
economic
development; and ( 2) compete effectively in the battle to
retain and expand Detroit's existing employers and tax base
and attract new employers.

METHODS:
Expediting government approval process for developers.
Encouraging formation of district employer associations.
3/90

II-37

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

Assisting
prospective
incentives.
Assisting employers
improvements.

employers

ECONOMIC POLICIES

to

get

financial

in land assembly and infrastructure

Encouraging training of entrepreneurs.
Coordinating development to maximize overall impact.
Encouraging development agencies to study overall economy
and make the most of multiplier effects.
Surveying employers to determine what is most needed.
POLICY 202-3: City of Detroit employment base. Continue and,
where feasible, upgrade the planning and implementation of
programs and projects aimed at maintaining and expanding
employment opportunities in the City in order to (1) provide
jobs for residents unable to commute: (2) provide adequate
levels of local retail commercial services for residents; and,
(3) improve the City's tax base.
METHODS:

Making use of viable "enterprise zone" legislation.
Providing transportation to where jobs are located.
Revising laws to give adequate special incentives to locate
in central city locations.
Discouraging building public
"urban sprawl".

facilities

which encourage

POLICY 202-4:
Education and job training and retraining.
Provide Detroit residents the qualifications and job skills
necessary to ( 1) enable them to compete effectively for
available jobs, and (2) provide a skilled labor pool that will
enable Detroit both to retain existing employers and attract
new ones.

METHODS:
Using incentives to provide on-the-job training.
Working toward a more effective and better funded Federal
job training program.

3/90

II-38

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

Working with school system to insure timely and suitable
training for youngsters to enter the work force.
POLICY 202-5: Equal employment opportunities for minorities.
women. and the handicapped.
Continue and, where feasible,
upgrade the promulgation and enforcement of rules and the
planning and implementation of programs and projects aimed at
providing equal employment opportunities for minorities,
women, and the handicapped.
METHODS:

Pursuing affirmative action for minorities, women, and the
handicapped.
Expanding "Head Start" programs and day-care programs.
Encouraging labor unions to include minorities, females,
and the handicapped in apprenticeship programs.
Supporting
programs.

flexible

working

hours

and/or

work

at

home

Supporting principles of equal pay for equal work.
Supporting small business assistance for
women.

minorities and

POLICY 202-6: Job opportunities and services for women. Make
a special effort to improve job opportunities and related
support services for female heads of households.
METHODS:

(Many of the approaches for serving these women would also
aid in meeting the needs of men, especially single
parents. )
Facilitating work-at-home arrangements and flexible work
schedules for single parents.
Encouraging neighborhood level community support systems
for "fragile" families.
Encouraging creation of child-care centers and latch-key
programs.
Inducing continuing public discussion of the causes of and
remedies for female poverty that results in large numbers
of children growing up in adverse poverty circumstances.
Exploring "job sharing" strategies.
3/90

II-39

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

SERVICE SECTOR POLICIES
POLICY 202-7: Growth potential of service industries. Target
plans, programs, and projects to retrain and expand service
industry employers because this is the primary sector of the
economy where there is growth.
METHODS:

Recognizing health services as major job providers.
Encouraging Detroit financial
nationally competitive.

institutions

to

remain

Encouraging foreign banks to locate in Detroit.
POLICY 202-8:
Retail development.
Stimulate the local
entrepreneurial talent of the City of Detroit by helping those
already in business to compete effectively on a regional
basis, and by encouraging new community-serving businesses to
develop in the City.
METHODS:

Increasing the quality and use of market survey techniques
to determine the significant consumer market segments in
Detroit.
Encouraging
individual
merchants
and
businessmen's
associations to become sensitive to the needs of particular
groups of consumers, such as the elderly, single-parent
households, female shoppers, male shoppers, workers with
limited time to shop, youth, visitors, conventioneers, etc.
Encouraging Detroit's educational community to make pupils
aware of the possibilities of their becoming entrepreneurs.
Encouraging
education
for
creative problem solving.
Encouraging training in entrepreneurship for adults.
Encouraging local merchants to form associations to make
collective purchases for cost savings, for bookkeeping and
cost-cutting devices, market information,
and credit
problems.
Encouraging the development of shoppers' cooperatives and
other forms of local ownership.
Encouraging local merchants to sponsor special community
events and in general maintaining close relations with
their local community.
3/90

II-40

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIOES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

Surveying existing businesses that may wish to locate
outlets in Detroit (such as off-price retailers) and
assisting in finding suitable locations. Encouraging the
location of chain stores.

POLICY 202-9
Commercial (for-profit) recreation and
entertainment: an economic development tool.
Recognize the
strong role that the commercial recreation sector plays in
the City economy and promote it as an economic development
tool.
METHODS:

Promoting the downtown and adjacent
commercial entertainment center.

areas

as

a

major

Promoting the convention and tourism industry focusing on
the Central Business District.
Encouraging commercial water-related
the riverfront.

recreation

uses

on

Encouraging artists and art groups.
Helping promote other entertainment facilities in the City.
POLICY 202-10:
Cultural events.
Recognize the value of
cultural events for attracting tourists to the City, and
promote them as an economic development tool.
METHODS:
Understanding and fostering the economic relationship
between the recreation and culture programs.
Developing a concentrated area, cooperatively backed by
both public and private development, for non-profit arts
and cottage craft industries, theaters, dance studios,
design and fashion outlets, musical venues, food, shopping,
and for-profit entertainment outlets.
Fully restoring and promoting
facilities like Fort Wayne.

historically

important

Renovating and promoting for cultural and business use
historical
buildings,
warehouses,
and
movie
palace
structures.
Increasing tours of industrial plants and other businesses.
3/90

II-41

�ECONOMIC POLICIES

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC..JES

Encouraging the development of travel and promotional
packages featuring all aspects of Detroit's cultural
offerings.
Monitoring all arts activity and ancillary economic dollar
multipliers in the public, private, and non-profit sectors.
POLICY 202-11: Role of high technology in the economy.
Utilize the knowledge that high technology is not a separate
economic sector but a facet of the modernization of home,
offices, factories, and the developing of plans, p r ograms,
and projects to improve Detroit's economy.
METHODS:

Attracting and developing high tech
industries
encouraging availability of venture capital.

and

Promoting use of advanced technology in City agencies, and
coordinating with private sector use.
Encouraging
further
industrial processes.

"research

and

development"

in

Supporting testing and training labs for small companies.
POLICY 202-12:
Energy usage. Monitor the role energy plays
in Detroit's relative economic advantage.
METHODS:

Conducting more systematic research about - the role of
energy considerations in industrial location; pinpointing
problems and seeking solutions affecting
industrial
location in Detroit.
MANUFACTURING POLICIES
POLICY 202-13: Manufacturing employment. Continue and, where
feasible, upgrade the planning and implementation of programs
and projects targeted at retaining and expanding manufacturing
employment even though the relative size of this sector of the
economy is declining rapidly, because manufacturing jobs in
general pay a living wage to their employees.
METHODS:

Supporting the auto industry as a continuing base of the
economy and assist the "just-in-time" inventory process.
3/90

II-42

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJ:ES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

Encouraging the local steel industries to modernize.
Encouraging local industry to use the local aluminum scrap.
Supporting updating of machine-tool industry.
Encouraging diversifying the economy.
Fostering
export.

food

processing

industries,

especially

for

Developing a local manufactured housing industry.
Monitoring
new
modernization.

industry

trends

and

encouraging

Fostering entrepreneurship and innovation.
Utilizing available State funds
related business.

to aid food processing-

POLICY 202-14: Industrial employer retention and expansion.
Continue and, where feasible, upgrade Detroit's plans and
programs to facilitate the retention and expansion of existing
industrial employers.
METHODS:

Providing financial
expansion.

assistance

for

modernization

and

Organizing and supporting industrial district associations.
Assisting employers to find new markets.
Assisting in land acquisition through various means
including assemblying and inventorying vacant parcels and
expediting the transferral process where appropriate.
Encouraging relocating to new Detroit facility when needed,
or to stay nearby in the region if a suitable site is not
available in Detroit.
Encouraging legislation to attract or retain employers.
Determining problems of employers through regular contacts.
Improving trafficways around industrial areas.

3/90

II-43

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

POLICY 202-15: Industrial employer attraction.
Continue
Detroit's plans and programs to attract new industrial
, employers, including new branches of existing companies and,
where feasible, upgrade them.
METHODS:

Providing financial incentives for new employers including
City equity position in projects where appropriate.
Promoting k~owledge of the fact that there exists a pool
of skilled tool and die, model and pattern makers in the
Detroit area.
Promoting the advantages of the proximity and cooperative
economic
relationship
between
Detroit
and
Windsor,
including the advantages brought about as a result of the
Free Trade Agreement.
Promoting unique sites near Port, Airport, etc.
Assisting employers to find and develop sites, as needed.
Maintaining and expanding industrial/commercial development
promotional programs.
Seeking suppliers of auto plants and foreign manufacturers
to move to Detroit.
Incubating new companies.
Recruiting manufacturers which are
counter-cyclical, where possible.

less

cyclical

or

POLICY 202-16: Industrial site availability. Maintain an
inventory of available industrial sites and facilities of
various sizes so that requests from employers wishing to
locate or relocate in Detroit can be met on a timely basis.

METHODS:

Developing methods to make Detroit site costs competitive
with suburban locations.
Maintaining an inventory of vacant, ready to develop
industrial sites of various sizes and transport options.
Marketing the foreign trade zone.

3/90

II-44

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIGJES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

Assembling usable industrial parcels by combining vacant,
obsolete industrial with vacant and deteriorated nearby
residential use areas.
Working with realtors in placing industries.
Maintaining an inventory of shared space for sale or lease
in multi-use buildings, and exploring the possibility of
shared services.
Exploring use of industrial "shell" buildings.
Demolishing
potential.

isolated

vacant

plants

without

economic

HOUSING POLICIES
POLICY 202-17: Private sector reinvestment in housing. Take
appropriate actions to influence and facilitate increased
private sector involvement in public programs that will propel
and
sustain
City
neighborhood-housing
stabilization
initiatives and promote City-wide revitalization.
METHODS:

Encouraging private residential development. Periodically,
reviewing the · building code for anachronisms and City
practices.
Making available to the private sector a City-wide analysis
and profile of Detroit neighborhood-housing needs.
Giving priority to funding neighborhood programs that
generate continued community investment with less public
involvement.
Supporting neighborhood-based housing programs.
Insuring strict enforcement of the Michigan anti-redlining
law and the community reinvestment act.
Devising programs which facilitate and encourage higher
levels of housing construction, maintenance, repair, and
rehabilitation.
Reviewing
local
housing
development
procedures
and
requirements to eliminate overregulation and unnecessary
delays.

3/90

II-45

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

Considering cooperative working programs between the
financial institution, the City, property owner, and the
tenants to induce rental property improvements.
Encouraging
more
direct
dialogue
between
development interests and community residents.

private

Developing programs to train minority housing developers,
contractors, and rehabilitation workers.
Considering 'programs to reduce land costs associa t ed with
neighborhood-housing
development
using
appropriate
incentives.
POLICY 202-18: Housing demand. Take appropriate actions to
stimulate increased demand for Detroit housing by all
household types.
METHODS:

Improving public/private
housing availability.

information

sources

on

City

Insuring that fair housing legislation is enforced.
Pursuing additional housing
renters and home buyers.

subsidies

for

lower

income

Pursuing employment and training programs which create job
opportunities and provide skills.
Reviewing local zoning ordinances and building codes for
changes that will facilitate providing appropriate housing.
Encouraging private market participation to provide housing
choices.
Supporting Federal and State legislation that would provide
assistance to central city new housing construction and
rehabilitation.
Considering possible revisions or new programs that will
provide additional financial resources to reduce the cost
of housing.
Promoting the systematic marketing of Detroit's image.
Considering possible revisions or new programs to make more
favorable mortgage financing available.
3/90

II-46

�ECONOMIC POLICIES

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

Maintaining and developing public transportation facilities
which make the City accessible.
Encouraging increased public, private, and
cooperation in neighborhood security efforts.
Supporting the development of amenities
through capital and operating programs.
Advertising
the
neighborhoods.

City's

commitment

community

and
to

services
improving

POLICY 202-19: Home ownership. Continue to promote efforts
to stabilize and increase the level of home ownership and
owner-occupied housing in the City.
METHODS:
Facilitating the removal of blighting conditions.
Working with the insurance industry to provide a full line
of insurance coverage at reasonable rates.
Providing adequate funds and
purchase and maintain homes.

financing

mechanisms

to

Supporting added State, Federal, and local programs that
increase home ownership.
Monitoring and assessing the viability of condominium and
cooperative conversions.
Supporting additional free or at-cost home repair and
maintenance programs for lower income owners.
Informing the public about different kinds of mortgages
and their pitfalls.
POLICY 202-20: Detroit city finances. Increase Detroit's tax
base by promoting development. Obtain a fair share of Federal
and State entitlement funds. This should be done so that the
City will have adequate
stable revenue sources to provide
services to residents and employers, with an overall tax
burden and fee-for-services schedule no higher than the
average for communities in southeastern Michigan.
METHODS:
Implementing
programs.
3/90

the

City's

development

and

employment

II-47

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

ECONOMIC POLICIES

Implementing acquisition of adequate funding from State
and Federal sources.
POLICY 202-2la: Water supply rates. Maintain water rates at
as moderate a level as possible which will provide sufficient
revenue for proper system maintenance and operation but will
not hamper economic development within the built-up area or

discourage water sales to customers.
POLICY 202-2lb: Sewerage rates. Maintain sewerage disposal
rates at a moderate level which provides sufficient revenue
for proper system maintenance and operation, does not hamper
economic development within built-up areas, or discourage
cooonunities from joining the Detroit system.
METHODS:

Retaining present customer base.
Improving working relationships with system customers and
the general public.
Carefully reviewing all requests to extend services beyond
the present areas in order to discourage urban sprawl.

3/90

II-48

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

ARTICLE 203
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS, POLICIES, AND STRATEGIES

INTRODUCTION TO PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES

The City of Detroit grew in distinct waves of population
immigration.
The period between 1910 to 1930 saw the
population of the City increase from 465,700 to 993,700, a
113% increase. As a consequence of these surges in residents,
much of the physical development of Detroit took place during
such periods. More than 47% of the current housing stock was
built during 1910 to 1935.
In addition to housing, many
public facilities such as schools, libraries, electrical
substations, sewers, etc., were built at the same time.
The policies presented here are aimed at addressing the
problems inherent in the simultaneous aging of the housing
stock, industrial buildings, and other facilities on such a
large scale.
Modernization, replacement, and reuse are all
strategies appropriate to Detroit's physical condition.
While the process of urban growth normally proceeds by adding
new structures to the outer fringe of development, the process
of aging is not as defined as that of growth. This means that
while much of the inner areas of Detroit are in need of
attention, some areas are aging or deteriorating more rapidly
than others. The policies urge sensitivity to varying levels
of deterioration and differing strategies of redevelopment.
Correction of land-use problems cannot be done by the public
sector alone.
Individual property owners, business people,
and
neighborhood
groups
must
all
do
their
share.
Collaboration between them and the public sector is essential.
REDEVELOPMENT POLICIES

POLICY 203-1: Attrition and renewal of physical facilities.
Conservation of the City's physical resources should be a
major priority
of the City.
Demolition should be a last
resort to remove a major safety hazard.
Special incentives
for rehabilitating existing structures must be continued and
expanded.

3/90

II-49

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

METHODS:
Holding
owners
responsible
for
the
condition
of
unoccupied property, and shortening the period before
government is legally allowed to take action to salvage
or demolish the building.
Encouraging
utilities
and
banks
to
make
provision~ for retrofitting of structures.
Encouraging owner occupancy of structures,
condominium and cooperative ownership types.

special
including

Encouraging and educating owners and potential owners to
perform preventative maintenance and early repair on
their property.
POLICY 203-2: Vacant land. Promote optimal reuse of vacant
land: exercise necessary actions to control and properly
maintain vacant land.
METHODS:

Developing a computerized land use inventory information
system to identify vacant property and target areas for
development opportunities.
Conducting design competitions to heighten awareness of
available vacant City development sites.
Expanding existing City practices regarding interim uses
for vacant land, including City-owned vacant parcels
being sold to adjacent property owners, using parcels by
neighborhood groups for parking or as play lots and
community gardens.
Expediting the process of vacant land transferral where
appropriate.
Promoting development of City-owned surplus lots and
providing new housing units for moderate income persons
using sweat equity and an owner-builder concept.
Reducing land costs associated with development,
appropriate incentives.

using

Identifying whether there are physical constraints or
basic
infrastructure
problems
with
existing
City
development sites and resolving them as appropriate.
3/90

II-50

�PHYSICAL

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

Improving the City maintenance of vacant lots to
eliminate problems of rodent infestation and other public
health concerns.
Considering possible
development plans.

land

trades

to

facilitate

City

Insuring that new housing construction involving infill
sites
is designed
to conform with
the existing
architecture.
Consider transferring ownership of vacant lots to
community organizations who are willing to improve and/or
maintain them under a contractual arrangement with the
City.
POLICY 203-3: Redevelopment. Combat and contain neighborhood
and commercial blight, remove blighted structures, assemble
land for redevelopment, rebuild neighborhoods, and when
necessary to a limited degree relocate families into other
neighborhoods with better social and physical conditions.
METHODS:

A limited program of blight clearance and carefully
coordinated relocation can create a new market for some
housing units in relatively good condition in those areas
of Detroit currently viable but with little demand. The
new owners would have a home in good condition with high
equity and low monthly payments. At the same time, land
could be assembled for rebuilding of deteriorated
neighborhoods including a wide range of housing types and
including new opportunities for high income, moderate
income as well as low-income housing.
In some cases,
land could be made available to encourage job-producing
business to locate or expand.
House moving should be
explored
to make
use of
vacant
lots
in
nearby
neighborhoods.
POLICY 203-4: Community resource areas. Treat concentrated
employment areas as resources for the whole community.
METHODS:

Maximizing the economic and employment potential of the
Central Business District and Woodward area.
3/90

II-51

I

I

I
I

�THE DETROI-T MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Completing the Medical Center renewal project
extending its influence within the Woodward area.

and

HOUSING STOCK POLICIES
POLICY 203-5:
Housin~ supPly.
Take appropriate actions to
facilitate the providing of an adequate supply and mix of
Detroit housing for all household types.
METHODS:

Developing and utilizing a City-wide analysis and profile
of neighborhood-housing needs.
Developing and utilizing a City-wide housing conditions
survey to provide a comprehensive profile.
Supporting the provision of diverse types of housing.
Encouraging multi-use projects with housing.
Providing incentives for housing project designs that
provide security, recreation, and esthetic quality.
Reviewing City zoning, property tax, public service, and
capital improvement programs to facilitate desired new
housing construction.
Supporting legislation that would
construction and rehabilitation.

assist

new

housing

Planning for housing to meet special needs of families,
children, the elderly, and the handicapped.
Providing adequate financial and technical assistance to
community-based groups in neighborhood housing.
Enabling people with lower incomes to remain in stable,
viable, but nonexclusionary communities with adequate
services.
Encouraging private market participation to
housing attractive to young childless couples.

provide

Reviewing local zoning ordinances and building codes to
facilitate appropriate down-sized, higher density housing
units; zero lot line and manufactured housing technology
should have higher priority. Facilitating use of mobile
and other manufactured housing where appropriate.
3/90

II-52

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIClES

Identifying sites along "development edges"
prime for housing development to enhance
neighborhoods.

PHYSICAL

that are
adjacent

Conducting design competitions to heighten awareness of
available vacant City development sites.
Assessing and monitoring the viability of condominium and
cooperative conversion.
Being alert to violations of tenants' rights.
Working to prevent the condition whereby speculators buy
and hold groups of HUD houses.

POLICY 203-6:
Existing housing stock.
Maintain habitable
City housing stock in good repair by promoting regular
maintenance programs for basically sound housing, and
rehabilitation programs to repair housing that is in a state
of disrepair or substandard and suitable for rehabilitation.
METHODS:

Supporting strict enforcement of the Michigan antiredlining law and the community reinvestment act.
Supporting additional free or at-cost home repair and
maintenance service for lower income home owners.
Transferring ownership or management control from owners
who abandon or disinvest in their property to tenants,
individuals, or non-profit groups.
Providing financial and technical assistance to community
groups and non-profits engaged in housing conservation
and rehabilitation efforts.
Encouraging the private financial community to provide
increased funds needed to leverage and sustain City
housing rehabilitation and conservation.
Training or informing persons about home maintenance or
neighborhood conservation techniques.
Emphasizing appropriate targeting and concentration of
City housing rehabilitation and conservation resources
in strategy areas.
3/90

II-53

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Promoting increased minority contractors' participation
in City housing rehabilitation and conservation programs.
Considering possible revisions or new programs that will
provide additional
financial
resources
to support
conservation and rehabilitation programs.
Suppor..ting efforts being made to assure that fire and
other homeowner insurance will be readily available.
Increa~ing the private
stabilization efforts.

sector

role

in

neighborhood

Developing a City-wide housing conditions survey to
provide a comparative profile of ·neighborhood housing
conditions.
-Considering placing a nuisance tax on owners of property
that has deteriorated to a condition that blights a
neighborhood.
POLICY 203-7: Abandonment of property. Continue to promote
programs and policies that will curtail contagious and
concentrated housing abandonment that is evident in some City
neighborhoods.
METHODS:

Considering policies to bring about legal transfer of
ownership or management control from owners who abandon
or disinvest in their property to tenants.
Insuring that adequate investment funds are available at
interest rates which encourage proper maintenance,
rehabilitation, and construction.
Providing training, advisory, and support services
owners and managers of multi-family housing.

to

Quickly identifying structures which are in the process
of being abandoned so they can be secured.
Expediting City ownership and/or
properties.
Using homesteading to
structures available.

3/90

make

control of abandoned

City

controlled

vacant

II-54

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

n

POLICY 203-8:
Public housing.
, of City public housing.

PHYSICAL

Maintain an adequate supply

METHODS:

Monitoring Federal public housing
legislation and
supporting changes which increase the local government's
control of rents, maintenance, financing, and management.
Seeking to involve the State and County in sharing the
cost of low-income public housing in Detroit.
Working with the local and regional area HUD offices to
develop innovative approaches to making low-income public
housing more competitive.
Where possible, rearranging housing configurations to
permit better child surveillance and more "defensible
space" features.

Designating surrounding areas where low-income public
housing is located for special considerations. This will
include rehabilitation loan and grant programs for homes
and businesses; organizations of the business community;
technical assistance to residents, businesses, community
groups, and other relevant groups; low-cost environmental
improvements; and, priority consideration for all grant
funds and new program development, where relevant.
Continuing to work toward streamlining City management
and maintenance techniques.
Involving tenants in selfmanagement.
Encouraging the scattered-site principle.
voucher programs.

Monitoring

POLICY 203-9: Rental housing. Take actions to stabilize the
quality and quantity of City rental housing stock and insure
that there is an adequate supply available to those who desire
it, especially lower income households.
METHODS:

Exploring use of the building code
landlord funds into maintenance.

to

channel

more

Working with Federal agencies to provide more control
over the indiscriminate sale of HUD properties.
3/90

II-55

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Providing accurate information, informed counselors, and
needed aid and advocacy services.
Bringing about legal transfer of ownership or management
control from owners who abandon or disinvest.
Finding ways to reduce absentee ownership.
Assessing and monitoring the viability of condominium and
cooperative conversion.
Supporting housing assistance programs that provide
sufficient subsidies to lower income households.
Supporting efforts being made to provide assurance that
fire and other property insurance will be readily
available.
Supporting efforts to enforce fair housing legislation
in the City.
Supporting and facilitating efforts
rehabilitate rental housing units.
Reviewing housing legislation to
compatible with Detroit housing
enforcement procedures.

to

build

and

insure that it is
and building code

Supporting effective enforcement of
inspection ordinance.

the annual

rental

POLICY 203-10:
Heating costs.
Promote energy conservation
and provide assistance in reducing heating costs.
METHODS:
Making available throughout the City,
information,
technical assistance, and assistance with cost.

Updating building codes to permit use of the most energyefficient building technologies.
Encouraging landlords to weatherize,
bills.

to reduce utility

POLICY 203-11:
Image of Detroit neighborhoods.
neighborhood-housing
activities
which
make
a
contribution to strengthening Detroit's image.
3/90

Promote
positive
II-56

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

,METHODS:

Conducting design competitions to heighten awareness of
available vacant City development sites.
Encouraging those interested in presenting the positive
aspects of Detroit neighborhoods to the public.
Promoting more organized neighborhood-based activities
like neighborhood ethnic festivals.
Promoting the systematic marketing of Detroit's image.
Promoting the expansion of programs which emphasize
Detroit's positive neighborhood aspects such as signs
identifying neighborhoods.
Advertising neighborhood stabilization/revitalization
efforts that are successful, and the City's commitment
to improving neighborhoods.
RETAIL AREA POLICIES
POLICY 203-12:
Major retail centers.
Promote and enhance
the long-term competitive position of Detroit's major retail
centers ( downtown and New Center) within the total retail
pattern of the Detroit region.
METHODS:
Surveying and analyzing lines of merchandise, types of
stores, types of services that would be unique within the
Detroit region, and encouraging them to locate in
downtown. Paying special attention to market segments (by
age, gender, income, etc.).
Promoting use of people mover and pedestrian skyway as
links
between
downtown
activity
centers.
Where
appropriate, developing retai 1 11 themes II for different
people mover stations.
Encouraging building owners to market upper-level vacant
space where it adjoins people-mover skyway system.
Providing convenient
retail centers.

3/90

short-term parking

in

the

major

II-57

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Promoting a downtown parking system that is accessible,
convenient, moderately priced, with lots that are paved,
lighted, and landscaped.
Encouraging merchants and
retail
sales
potential
especially workers who have
need auto repair services
services.

businessmen to capture full
of
workers
and
visitors,
limited time to shop, who may
or other types of consumer

Promoting retailing hours and workers' hours that will
accommodate working single women and families with two
working spouses.
Building climate-controlled environments and creating an
environment of fun for comparison shoppers, including
frequent special events.

POLICY 203-13:
Comparison retail centers.
Assure that
Detroit resident consumers will have available to them
reasonably accessible, competitively priced, high quality
comparison goods and consumer services.
METHODS:
Maintaining and improving existing comparison shopping
centers and shopping districts throughout the City by
making them safe and pleasant areas in which to shop and
to do business.
Encouraging development of new types of centers or
districts focused on home maintenance or personal service
needs.
Encouraging
retail
merchants
to
expand
lines
of
merchandise to increase both variety and quality of goods
and to work together.
Recognizing the importance of certain public service
facilities (such as the post office, Michigan Secretary
of State) as well as the importance of chain stores, to
the viability of comparison centers.
Encouraging merchants' associations to perform frequent
market studies.
Encouraging transportation services
without
cars
to
reach
Detroit
inexpensively and conveniently.
3/90

to help
shopping

people
areas
II-58

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

PHYSICAL

Encouraging the development of shoppers' cooperatives and
other forms of local ownership.
Encouraging merchants and other businessmen to coordinate
hours of operation.
Assuring public safety, sufficient crosswalk areas at
intersections, high levels of street lighting .
Continuing programs of facade improvement and street
improvements and promote better relationships of parking
facilities to store facilities.
Encouraging grouping of stores
street parking can be provided.

in centers

where off-

Encouraging local merchants to strive for attractive and
clean establishments and grounds.
POLICY 203-14: Neighborhood commercial recreation. Encourage
the establishment of neighborhood commercial recreation
opportunities in areas lacking them.

METHODS:
Redeveloping or rehabilitating neighborhood commercial
areas for recreation uses.
Assisting in finding reuses of movie houses and bowling
alleys.
Promoting family-use oriented neighborhood businesses.
Controlling
nuisance-type
neighborhoods.

recreation

businesses

in

POLICY 203-15:
General commercial and neighborhood retail
areas. Encourage the grouping of existing viable convenience
retail establishments into one-stop shopping centers with a
supermarket and drugstore anchors for the center.
METHODS:

Encouraging conversion of obsolete
neighborhood-serving facilities.
Where feasible,
parking.
3/90

utilizing

vacant

gas

lots

stations
for

into

off-street
II-59

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Demolishing vacant and abandoned structures.
Rezoning from B4 to B2 or B3 portions of thoroughfare
frontage that are no longer appropriate or viable for
general business purposes.

POLICY 203-16:
Thoroughfare frontage.
Maintain healthy
commercial development along thoroughfares and phase out or
redevelop excess or obsolete structures.
METHODS:
Continuing to utilize matching grants to stimulate owners
to make facade improvements.
Encouraging redevelopment of vacant strip commercial land
in a manner that captures the automobile-oriented nature
of the thoroughfare.
Encouraging conversion of some vacant commercial lots
into parking spaces to serve viable businesses. Parking
should have high visibility and safety.
Promoting drive-through style establishments including
the sale of convenience goods (such as gas stations are
beginning to do), restaurants, banks, newspaper stands,
ticket booths, etc.
Installing
a
system
of
directional
signs
identification markers that will help motorists
establishments along thoroughfares more easily.

and
find

Reducing visual blight along the major traffic arteries
of the City.
Stimulating residential and other uses to locate along
thoroughfares.
Reducing opportunities for abrasive uses to locate where
they may damage other uses.
INDUSTRIAL AREAS POLICIES

POLICY 203-17: Industrial areas. Maximize the economic and
employment potential of the City's industrial areas and
reinforce them as long-term employment centers.

3/90

II-60

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

METHODS:

Capitalizing upon existing major industrial employment
anchors by improving the environment and security in
surrounding
areas,
providing
land
for
new
small
industries,
promoting
adaptive
reuse
of
existing
buildings, improvements in traffic circulation, and
providing room for expansion.
In strategic areas, promoting development of research
facilities and related offices, especially emphasizing
high technology in their manufacturing processes.
Improving thoroughfares and rail access so that both
workers and materials can move freely to and from the
plant.
Increasing emphasis on rehabilitation and subdivision of
industrial buildings for inexpensive industrial rentals.
The City should capitalize upon this newly available
space.
The buildings should be made as attractive as
possible.
Identifying suitable sites for modern industrial plants,
with parking and with a margin of area for modernization
and expansion.
Promoting the basic concept of II Industrial Interpretation 11
as it relates to the educational and tourism aspects of
industry.
POLICY 203-18:
Relationship of industry to residence.
Improve physical, functional, and visual relationships between
industries and adjacent neighborhoods.
An effort should be
made to strengthen the bond between major employment centers
and the communities in which they are located.
METHODS:

Separating heavy industry and homes further, keeping
heavy industry at the core of the industrial belts and
lighter industry and business with compatible performance
characteristics along the outer edges.
Establishing green-space buffers and open areas between
heavy industry and homes.

3/90

II-61

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Widening some thoroughfares and routing some accessways
along industrial corridors.
Reviewing the edges of many industrial corridors for
potential rezoning from M4 to M2 or M3 to protect nearby
housing.
Pockets of declining housing located within
industrial areas should be zoned TM, transitional
industrial.
Promoting ·the basic concepts of the Image Corridor as it
related to industry which is adjacent to residential and
commercial areas. This concept establishes visual and/or
physical
buffers
between
unattractive
industrial
activities and the public space.
Establishing landscape buffers along railroad corridor
rights-of-way when they are adjacent to residential
areas.
Encouraging industries to establish a unified paint and
maintenance program to improve the visual image of their
facilities.
HUMAN SERVICES FACILITIES POLICIES
POLICY 203-19:
Public school facilities.
Utilize the
existing public school plant in as advantageous and costeffective manner as possible.

METHODS:
Utilizing the public schools as developmental anchors
which can be capitalized upon to give additional strength
to their surrounding communities.
Improving energy conservation in school buildings.
Maintaining school facilities in proper repair.
Making fuller community use of school buildings.
Improving coordination between the City government and
the Board of Education on use of schools and school
facilities.
POLICY 203-20: Access to and efficiency of post-secondary
schools.
Encourage the provision of convenient access to
post-secondary schools, their cost effectiveness and positive
relations with their surroundings.
3/90

II-62

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

PHYSICAL

METHODS:

Developing school sites for security and efficiency.
Promoting their positive relationships with surrounding

business areas and neighborhoods.
Encouraging locations that provide access
transit and other transportation modes.

by

public

Encouraging grouping of educational facilities so that
costly equipment and staff may be shared.
POLICY 203-21:
Access to library facilities.
Encourage
provision of convenient access to library facilities for all
parts of the City and all segments of the population.
METHODS:

Locating branches so that they are convenient to large
segments of the community or adjacent to major activity
centers and access is not inhibited and public transit
lines are available.
Exploring non-traditional means of service delivery
including the use of leased facilities and smaller, less
permanent facilities.
Also include expanded telephone
service, computerized linkage to homes, use of cable
systems, lending of tapes, cassettes and disks for home
computers, linkages between various information systems
to access world-wide networks.
POLICY 203-22:
Coordination for medical facility access.
Insure that the Detroit Medical Center is developed with all
appropriate facilities and specialties to make it a complete
medical center including a Veterans Hospital.
METHODS:

Working with the State and the regional Comprehensive
Health Planning Council to coordinate the development of
medical facilities and to prevent the overbuilding or
overdevelopment of facilities.
Insuring that the Emergency Medical Service has funding
and organization for adequate response time and full
coverage of the City.

3/90

II-63

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC..IES

PHYSICAL

Improving physical access to medical centers by public
transit or para-transit programs.
POLICY 203-23: Overall public parks and recreation. Provide
land and buildings for public recreation opportunities
distributed throughout the neighborhoods .of the City in
proportion to population density and to the availability of
alternative (non-City) services.
METHODS:
Retaining and improving existing recreation land. Land
now in recreation use should be kept unless exchanged for
facilities of equal or better recreational value, or
unless identified as "surplus", or as having liability
problems.
Acquiring and developing new recreation land in underserviced neighborhoods of the City.
Reserving and assembling land or gaining easements as
opportunities arise in renewal areas and strategic areas.
Providing indoor recreation space by constructing new
centers or expanding existing centers.
POLICY 203-24:
Coordination of recreation
resources.
Generally, a policy of joint use of existing land and
facilities is an efficient use of resources and should be
pursued whenever possible.
METHODS:
Increasing coordination between the City administration
and the Detroit Public Schools.
Considering surplus private as well as public properties
for short- or long-term recreation use.
Strengthening coordination between the public and
private non-profit sector providers.

the

Providing transportation assistance to recreation centers
and programs especially for the handicapped, seniors, and
children.
Encouraging the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority to
provide public transportation to its metro parks in the
summer.
3/90

II-64

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

,URBAN DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES

POLICY 203-25: Natural environment and features. Recognize
and maintain the natural environment and features of the City
for its residents. This includes landscaping and vegetation,
parks and open space, topography, and the riverfront.
METHODS:

(Vegetation)
Including landscaping as an integral
public and private development.

element

of

both

Defining and enhancing City patterns through vegetation.
The importance of major streets can be made more visible
through the use of several types of stately trees planted
at regularly spaced intervals.
Softening and
vegetation.

screening

conflicting

land

uses

with

Designing landscaping to take into account maintenance
concerns such as drainage,
irrigation,
soil type,
susceptibility to salt and disease, and vandalism, abuse.
Using plant material that is attractive all year long.
Using more evergreen
trees and shrubs
that
have
interesting wintertime color and shapes.
Using year-round ground cover more extensively.
(Parks and Open Space)
Protecting and preserving several unique parks and open
areas.
Accentuating slight variations in the City's flatness.
opportunities exist, creating changes of level.
Creating hills and valleys in parks.
Protecting the
slope of the land and edges along the River.

Where

Improving physical and visual access to the River and
other major vistas, from adjacent areas.
Establishing
a series of bicycle and pedestrian walkways and small
parks along the water's edge which allow public access
along the River and are linked to Jefferson and major
developments along the riverfront.
3/90

II-65

�PHYSICAL

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC.IES

, POLICY 203-26:
Climate and urban design.
Recognize the
effects of climate in Detroit and design structures and spaces
to make life pleasant in this environment.
METHODS:

Taking into account the sun's orientation in siting of
buildings, structures, parks, and plazas.
Using vegetation effectively
buildings and areas.

for

climate

control

of

Providing shelter throughout the City at transit stops.
Encouraging provision of canopies on building facades to
protect pedestrians from the elements.
Whenever
possible,
integrating atr iums,
skylights,
plazas, and outdoor cafes into developments.
POLICY 203-27:
Design elements.
Improve the esthetic,
physical, and functional condition of the City for the
workers, visitors, and residents, and relating to the human
needs of the users.
METHODS:

Building Design.
Insuring that the size, shape, and
color of new development respects its environment and
takes into account its visible impact on the image and
character of the surrounding cityscape. Where there is
an already existing diversity of scale, insure that the
integrity of
the
smaller
elements
is
respected.
Encouraging new development in commercial areas to
include pedestrian-oriented, commercial uses on its
ground level.
Designing building facades
to be
coordinated and legible to passing motorists and
pedestrians.
Signage should be compatible with its
building's architectural character and not be excessive
in scale.
Insuring that the siting and massing of
buildings is responsive to its environment.
Preserving
buildings of architectural and historic significance and
adaptively reusing them as much as possible. Identifying
and emphasizing landmarks throughout the City; they
should serve as orientation devices. Clearly marking and
lighting up at night visually prominent buildings such
as the Fisher Building in the New Center, Old Main on
Wayne State's campus, and various churches around the
City.
3/90

II-66

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Barriers:
Minimizing the effect of existing barriers
inhibiting pedestrian circulation, including mobility of
the handicapped, through modifications or additions to
structures. New developments should be barrier-free.
Color:
Using colors on buildings that are compatible
with the scale and type of building and its context.
Scale: Make sensitive and intelligent use of scale, from
the grandiose to the intimate, with an emphasis on
"human" scale.
Lighting: Providing adequate and attractive lighting for
pedestrians and vehicles.
Incorporating special or
decorative lighting to emphasize architectural design or
streetscape character.
Providing for natural light in
buildings whenever possible.
Streets: Emphasizing the relationship of vehicular
circulation paths to functional uses of the City in
streetscape design.
Clearly labeling and attractively
landscaping gateways into the City and into downtown.
Developing a set of designs of street standards for each
classification to reinforce the use and image of those
streets. Establishing
streetscapes which generally
have uniform setbacks, light standards, street furniture,
and compatible landscaping. Giving careful attention to
the maintenance and appearance of freeways.
Lighting
should be brighter for heavily used major arterial
streets, and use of stately street trees would give these
streets continuity and dignity.
Coordinating signage
along
these
corridors
and
encouraging
it
to
be
appropriate in scale to its surroundings.
Lighting on
collector streets should be less intense than those of
the arterial routes and light standards should be smaller
in scale.
Making landscaping of appropriate scale.
Improving pedestrian traffic
flow
in neighborhood
shopping districts and in areas where there is intense
pedestrian traffic.
Gateways:
Establishing the presence of visual gateways
leading into the Central Business District and at other
locations
throughout
the
City
where
there
is
a
significant change in character of the thoroughfare, such
as a major activity center. Reinforcing with landscaping
special lighting, sign control, screening, and improved
maintenance.

3/90

II-67

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Activity Nodes:
Establishing activity nodes at major
intersections utilizing the techniques mentioned in the
two previous recommendations.
Linkage: Strengthening vehicular and pedestrian linkage
between adjacent development areas and/or neighborhoods.
Identifying and emphasizing major circulation paths which
connect one activity node to another.
Encouraging
greater activity relationship and pedestrian movement
between opposite sides of the thoroughfare and also along
existing development areas.
Improving the visual entry
into the riverfront and other neighborhood side streets
with streetscape design elements.
Public Mass Transit:
Locating mass transit stations
within a convenient distance of major activity centers.
Designing stations compatible with their individual site
context yet also appearing to have a similar identity
system-wide. The stations, guideways, and entrances to
the light rail system should be compatible to adjacent
neighborhoods.
Commercial Streets: Designing commercial streets, like
other public spaces, for ease of maintenance, safety,
security, and comfortable environment.
Developing a
comprehensive set of street graphics and sign criteria
within the context of accepted traffic graphics design
which will enhance traffic safety as well as improve the
esthetics of commercial streets. Encouraging individual
centers to express their unique character through murals
and sculpture, conforming to an overall design theme.
Matching image and appearance of commercial strips with
their functional and symbolic role.
Enhancing the
dignity of the streetscape of symbolically important
streets such as Woodward and Jefferson by planting a row
of large shade trees along their entire
routes,
punctuating this canopy of shade trees with flowering
trees at important intersections and entrances along
their routes.
Preserving many of the older, more
distinctive styles of street light standards.
When
styles of street lights change along a route, making an
attempt
to insure that
the various segments are
compatible in terms of height, size, and color with one
another.
When a post is knocked down, matching a
replacement as closely as possible.
POLICY 203-28:
Vistas and panoramas.
Protect distinctive
vistas and panoramas throughout the City.

,

3/90

II-68

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

METHODS:

Protecting visual and physical access to the riverfront.
Protecting visual access to distinctive open spaces such
as Belle Isle, Palmer Park, or the Main Library and the
Detroit Institute of Arts.
Protecting visual and physical access to distinctive
landmarks such as the Soldiers and Sailors Monument or
the Ambassador Bridge.
POLICY 203-29:
Architectural compatibility.
Recognize the
esthetic diversity of the City's neighborhoods when building

new structures in these areas.
Supplemental development
should
be
compatible
with
any
existing
elements.
Neighborhoods should continue to be maintained, and additional
esthetic and recreational amenities should be provided to
promote the neighborhood's continued viability.
METHODS:

Design theme.
Expressing visually the uniqueness of
different neighborhoods through landscaping, sculpture,
murals, and in the way buildings are shown to relate to
one another.
Care should be taken to have light
standards,
signage, and street furniture
that are
esthetically
consistent with their environment and each
other.
Vehicular circulation. Discouraging through-traffic from
penetrating into residential areas.
Reducing excessive
amounts of traffic by a variety of design techniques,
including
narrowing
of
streets
or
intersections,
landscaping, diversion of traffic and closing of streets.
Trees: Shade trees are the single most important element
that enhances the character and amenity of residential
neighborhoods.
When trees are lost from disease,
replacing them immediately and then encouraging home
owners to maintain them regularly.
Public facilities:
Designing public buildings such as
schools, recreation centers, libraries, police and fire
stations to be compatible with their neighborhood,
landscaping them generously, and maintaining them neatly.

3/90

II-69

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES
POLICY 203-30:
, public art as
development.

PHYSICAL

Public art.
Encourage the provision of
part of every major public and private

METHODS:
Encouraging the adoption of a systematic public funding
ordinance for public art commissions.
Actively working with local and national design and
architectural firms for the inclusion of sculpture and
murals in projects.
Encouraging
spaces.

the

esthetic

improvement

of

all

public

Encouraging the "adoption" of sculpture to be placed in
neighborhood parks.
Encouraging the selective use of murals to be executed
by artists.
POLICY 203-31:
Historic preservation - overall design and
economic feasibility.
Historic preservation of individual
buildings or districts should keep in mind the overall design
and needs of the City and also be economically feasible.
METHODS:

Determining on a case-by-case basis the merits of
historic designation for a particular building or group
of buildings, keeping in mind broader design issues and
economic concerns for the City.
Identifying the potential uses for the buildings.
Developing a preliminary financial
renovation of the structure(s).

package

for

the

Marketing these structure(s) to investors, with Federal
Tax Act credits and other financing mechanisms as
incentives.
POLICY 203-32:
Historic districts.
Use historic district
designation in a way that will benefit the affected area and
the City.

3/90

II-70

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

METHODS:

Identifying areas of the City or structures which could
benefit from designation and where there is potential
financial interest.
Fostering
neighborhood
confidence
identification leading to increased
historic properties.

and
community
maintenance of

Practicing selectivity of historic designation so that
economic and structural development are not impeded.
POLICY 203-33: Historic preservation - alternative uses.
Find alternative uses for preserved or restored properties,
where needed.
METHODS:

Redeveloping vacant structures by finding new uses and
ways to conserve energy.
Developing apartments within vacant high-rise office
buildings and extremely large single-family houses in
certain areas of the City.
Preserving theaters and churches by converting them to
community centers or combining the resources of several
performing groups into an association operating out of
one facility.
TRANSPORTATION POLICIES
POLICY 203-34:
Funding of trafficways.
The expenditure of
trafficway funds should strike an appropriate balance between
the improvement and upkeep of existing trafficways and the
development of new trafficways.
METHODS:

Utilizing traffic management techniques, such as traffic
signal integration, for proper sequencing for the flow
of traffic as a means of improving the use of existing
facilities.
Utilizing lanes currently reserved for parking during
high peak travel periods in order to get maximum use out
of traffic lanes.
Consideration must be given to
abutting property owners with parking needs.
3/90

II-71

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

With minimum expenditure, developing left-turn channels
to insure that left-turn movements do not interfere with
through traffic.
Developing grade-separated pedestrian crossings at areas
of high volume or high-speed vehicular movement.
Developing a repaving schedule that will insure a
continuous high quality, safe road surface throughout the
City and that is coordinated with other construction
projects to minimize disruption.
Maintaining thoroughfares and
round safe passage.

rights-of-way for

year-

Phasing out trafficways and alleys that no longer serve
a useful traffic function.
Working to make State and Federal funding more flexible
for local needs.
POLICY 203-35: Trafficways in neighborhoods. The trafficway
system should be nondisruptive to the abutting neighborhoods;
major trafficway functions should not split neighborhood
areas.
METHODS:

When appropriate, converting one-way pairs to single twoway thoroughfares with the remaining alternate street
converted to local usage.
Conducting feasibility studies for "left only'' turning
lanes at major intersections. Streets which become oneway at the alleys often create traffic problems because
of the lack of stacking space, "turn around" areas, and
conflicting traffic flows.
Identify points where such
problems occur and resolve the problems. Consider vacant
commercial lots as entrances where two-way access is
desired.

When it is necessary to upgrade trafficways, do so within
the existing right-of-way to the extent possible.
Attempting to provide buffers such as berms, walls, and
distance between high volume traff icways and adjacent
sensitive uses.
3/90

II-72

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Designating trafficways that abut less sensitive areas
for use by heavy vehicles such as trucks.
Considering the needs and requirements of the City and
its
residents
in conjunction with the needs and
requir-ements of the region for the regional trafficway
system.
Improving and/or grade-separating rail crossings where
appropriate.
Eliminating
needed.

traffic signals where

they

are

no

longer

POLICY 203-36: Trafficways - infrastructure. The development
of the traff icways system should be utilized as a tool in
promoting the existing infrastructure of the City and region.
METHODS:

Designing the City's trafficways system to serve existing
facilities, promoting their continued viability, and
providing for the recycling of existing facilities.
Designing and phasing the development of regional
trafficways in such a manner so as not to promote
continued sprawl of the residential, job, and economic
base throughout the region.
Limiting the development of major trafficways serving the
hinterlands and utilizing scarce resources to maintain
and upgrade the existing trafficways system.
POLICY 203-37:
Trafficways - orientation.
Develop methods
to orient users of the transportation system to the various
parts of the City.
METHODS:

On a
region-wide basis, developing a signage and
orientation system which denotes certain communities and
identifies their location.
Within the City,
identifying various neighborhoods
through identification devices such as name logos, etc.
Consider an improved street sign system to increase
street
name
visibility
to
drivers
along
major
thoroughfares.
3/90

II-73

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Developing standards and guidelines for identification
signs that utilize recognized insignias, shapes, etc.
Within major activities areas such as the Central
Business District and the New Center, developing and
placing at strategic locations maps identifying major
landmarks and destinations.
Utilizing various devices such as color coding
insignias·to identify various types of activities.

and

POLICY 203-38:
Traff icways development.
Insure that the
trafficway system is used in conjunction with other devices
as a development tool for the City.
METHODS:

As industrial sites become available, acquiring the
necessary property to reconfigure the street system and
consolidating parcels by the City.
In residential areas that are subjected to a large amount
of
through-traffic
because
of
turning
movements,
shortcuts, etc., providing diverters and other methods
that will discourage through traffic movement.
Closing thoroughfares and alleys that no longer serve a
useful traffic purpose.
Scheduling thoroughfare improvement to complement other
infrastructure, facility and utility improvements in
order to minimize disruption, taking advantage of joint
construction efficiencies, and providing a highly usable
product.
Where needed, developing new thoroughfares to serve areas
undergoing major redevelopment or areas where major new
development might take place with an improved trafficway
system.
POLICY 203-39:
Trafficway safety.
the citizenry in the development
trafficway system.

Emphasize the safety of
and utilization of the

METHODS:

Enacting and enforcing regulations that will insure that
the vehicles and drivers operating on the City streets
are safe.
3/90

II-74

�THE DETROIT MAST.ER PLAN OF POLIClES

PHYSICAL

Encouraging automobile manufacturers to build automobiles
that can be more safely operated by drivers with marginal
driving experience in urban traffic conditions. Examples
include anti-skid devices, more visible lighting on
vehicles, anti-rollback devices for hills and devices to
prevent operation of vehicles by intoxicated individuals.
Inventorying traffic areas deemed unsafe throughout the
City and developing mechanisms for improvement and
correction.
Seeking funds to provide the maximum in safety devices
throughout the City, including devices that will assist
in preventing accidents and devices that will limit the
severity of accidents.
POLICY 203-40: Freight transportation. Maintain and, where
feasible, upgrade Detroit's freight transportation system as
one of the major assets of the City.

METHODS:

Marketing the Foreign Trade Zone.
Encouraging Federal legislation that lowers local costs
for Port improvements and maintenance.
Considering further extension of the shipping season.
Recognizing
the
importance
transport systems to Detroit.

of

Canadian

ports

and

Encouraging enlargement of the existing railroad tunnel
under the Detroit River.
Encouraging the improved freight-carrier processing
capacity of the Ambassador Bridge in light of the
potential increase in truck traffic resulting from the
U.S./Canadian Free Trade Agreement.
Supporting U. S. Army Corps of Engineers projects which
would aid navigation and help Detroit.
Making intermodal transport connections more efficient.
Monitoring railroad track abandonment and consolidation.

3/90

II-75

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Urging railroads to remove obsolete trackage and market
lands for development.
Upgrading Detroit City Airport and encouraging adjacent
sites for freight transportation and other Airportrelated activity.
Monitoring pipeline technology and insuring applications
which will benefit Detroit.
Keeping freight transport facilities in good repair.
POLICY 203-41: Transit access. The existing public transit
system should provide reasonable access to the neighborhoods,
activity centers, and user groups of the City.
METHODS:
Continuously review the needs of Detroit residents who
use Detroit's bus system in order to make the system more
responsive to identified needs, including destinations
or trip purpose, trip length, and time of day and week,
and modifying the bus system to meet those needs.
Determining the off-peak needs of various users of th~
bus system and serving those needs to the extent
possible.
Encouraging the enhancement of a "paratransit" system,
especially to provide door-to-door services for the
handicapped and elderly.
Emphasizing service to Detroit shopping facilities and
activity centers, as opposed to suburban centers.
Developing an improved bus-repair · system so that enough
buses are in use to serve needs.
Encouraging ride sharing in automobiles so that those
people who lack cars have more than one alternative.
POLICY 203-42: Cost efficiency of public transit. A transit
system must be maintained that is cost efficient in order to
insure its continued viability, provide service to the people
who are transit dependent, and maintain an alternate mode of
travel for those who prefer it.

3/90

II-76

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

METHODS:

I

Considering the transit system as a public utility much
like electricity, gas, and water, such that the need for
public transit is no longer a debatable issue and
necessary funds are provided as a matter of course.

\

Providing amenities and service at levels that will
encourage increased ridership. Pay special attention to
security measures pertaining to transit usage.
Considering the transit system as an adjunct to the
traffic system. Utilizing earmarked trafficway funds on
the basis of transit freeing trafficway space and better
management of the trafficway system.
Configuring the transit system in such a fashion that it
encourages development
to take place
in selected
corridors, thereby potentially increasing ridership in
those
corridors
and
benefit ting
from
increased
efficiencies.
Using flex-time in peak employment areas to level off
demand for transit at rush hours.
POLICY 203-43: Transit and economic development. The present
and future public transit system should promote jobs and
economic development in the City and serve to promote the
utilization of the existing infrastructure.
METHODS:

Developing a fixed rail transit system that will serve
to institutionalize and solidify Detroit's Central
Business District and Lower Woodward Carr idor as the
center and economic heart of the Detroit metropolitan
region.
Upgrading Detroit's transit system to provide better
service and attract ridership at the City's economic
activity centers.
Developing transit lines that will provide access for
Detroit residents to outlying job centers.
Enhancing the Downtown People Mover.
Expanding the
system to serve additional activity areas of the Central
Business District.
3/90

II-77

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

POLICY 203-44: Light rail transit system. Design and develop
, a light rail rapid transit system focused on downtown Detroit
with alignments along Woodward Avenue and Gratiot and
terminating at locations in Oakland and Macomb Counties,
respectively.
METHODS:

Restudying the traffic, parking, environmental, and
economic development benefits of a light rail system to
Detroit, Oakland, and Macomb Counties.
Identifying sources of development funding, including
State of Michigan and Federal government involvement.
Promoting the concept of "value capture" wherein those
businesses and areas most benefitted by the light rail
system would contribute toward its development and/or
operation.
POLICY 203-45: Pedestrians. Major activity areas should be
designed to accommodate high levels of pedestrian activity.
METHODS:
Attempting to separate vehicular from pedestrian traffic
by grade separations in areas of extremely high activity.
Creating vehicular-free zones and developing pedestrian
malls and courts where a large amount of pedestrian
traffic is necessary to carry out daily activities.
Providing
proper
signage,
refuge
areas
(safety
standards), and traffic signal timings to allow for safe
passage in high activity areas where large numbers of
senior citizens and handicapped people are present.
Insuring that proper weight is given to the volume of
pedestrians and the type of pedestrians utilizing the
crossing areas in the timing of traffic signals and other
devices.
Experimenting with pedestrian signalization and crosswalk
timing patterns and peak-hour changes which give
precedence to pedestrians over vehicles in high activity
centers.

3/90

II-78

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSI~

POLICY 203-46:
Parking management.
Develop a system to
•provide for improved management and control of the parking
facilities in major activity centers.
METHODS:

Developing realistic design standards that can be
implemented for
parking
lots,
both permanent and
temporary facilities.
Developing a pricing structure that is conducive to the
use of public parking facilities in the activity centers
and, at the same time, provides adequate return to
operate and maintain the parking facilities in a manner
that will enhance the area.
Developing a method for relating the supply of parking
facilities to the need. It should be part of an overall
plan that might include shuttle facilities and shared
parking facilities.
Validation programs may be useful
in major activity centers.
Developing a management system to oversee and coordinate
the parking that serves major activity centers that have
a large number of parking spaces provided by multiple
suppliers.
Insuring that the operators of private parking lots and
garages meet their responsibilities with respect to
security, maintenance of facilities, and conformance to
a
fair
pricing policy that is prevalent
in
the
surrounding area.
Insuring that existing codes and ordinances that pertain
to parking including zoning, licensing requirements,
relevant
traffic ordinances,
and
individual
grant
requirements are strictly enforced.
Developing a method so that short-term and long-term
parking
needs are balanced so that one does not take
priority to the other's detriment.
Insuring that the needs of the handicapped are met.
Parking lots should not preempt viable economic uses or
cause major disruption to building and development
patterns.

3/90

II-79

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Insuring that parking facilities are designed with
consideration for the safety and security of its users
including such items as lighting, lack of blind spots,
etc.
POLICY 203-47: Parking in neighborhoods. Parking in or near
major activity areas should not be disruptive to surrounding
residential neighborhoods.
METHODS:

Insuring that major activity centers provide adequate
parking that is designed in such a way that it will
encourage patrons of the activity centers to use it
rather than park in nearby neighborhoods.
Enforcing rules and ordinances concerning parking so that
residents are not unduly penalized for their vehicles
during events taking place in nearby activity centers,
and so that adequate parking space remains for residents.
Insuring that the parking lane is properly maintained and
available for parking when on-street parking is an
important element in the area's parking system.
Enc.o uraging residents to pave driveways and build garages
in neighborhoods which are exceptionally congested
because of lack of off-street parking facilities.
POLICY 203-48: On-street parking: On-street parking should
not be disruptive to day-to-day life in the community or to
the smooth flow of traffic nor should it be detrimental to
the pedestrian system.
It should serve commercial entities
where off-street facilities cannot be provided.
METHODS:

Permitting on-street parking in areas where it is needed
to serve commerce and residential needs to the extent
possible.
Prohibiting on-street parking during those peak traffic
time periods in situations where the traffic flow
requires it.
Providing adequate signage, signalization and controls
to accommodate pedestrian needs in areas with commercial
concentrations.
3/90

II-80

�PHYSICAL

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

Limiting parking to one side of the street may be helpful
in some cases.
POLICY 203-49:
On-street loading. The loading and unloading
of goods for commercial areas should not interfere with the
orderly flow of traffic nor constitute a safety hazard.
METHODS:

Providing off-street loading wherever possible, utilizing
off-street parking lots, vacant lots, and other available
facilities.
Encouraging the sharing of off-street loading by adjacent
facilities.
Allowing on-street loading only in areas where absolutely
necessary and then only from the curb lane.
Prohibiting
on-street
loading
constitutes a safety hazard.

entirely

where

it

Developing means to provide for the security of the
delivery personnel and vehicles when exact proximity
between the delivery vehicle and the delivery place is
not possible.
Encouraging the development of rear delivery facilities
where alley delivery is possible.
POLICY 203-50:
Aviation - Improve Detroit City Airport.
Expand the airfield and air terminal capacity at Detroit city
Airport
in
an
economically
sound and
environmentally
compatible manner in order to take advantage of the rapidly
increasing aviation demand in the Detroit region. The major
objectives of the expanded Airport will be to:
1.

Provide convenient and
transportation
services
businesses

2.

Enhance the job and tax base of Detroit from the
increased levels of economic activity that an expanded
airport will generate

3.

Complement
the
aviation
capability
of
Detroit
Metropolitan Wayne County Airport in a manner that
creates a well-functioning regional airport system.

3/90

accessible air
and ground
to
Detroit
residents
and

II-81

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

METHODS:

Promoting the expansion of the air carrier and corporate
aircraft activity.
Removing
off-Airport
opportunities arise.
Improving
ground
facilities.

aviation

access

and

obstructions
automobile

as

parking

Promoting the locational advantages of City Airport
(close to downtown, the New Center, GM Tech Center, etc.)
and promoting the Airport as an incentive for development
in its general area.
Developing a new Airport Master Plan. This Master Plan
will forecast aviation demand over 20 years; identify
airport facilities required to meet the forecast demand:
and propose an airport layout plan, a ground access plan,
a staged development plan, and a financial plan.
Analyzing the environmental impacts of all proposed
improvements to Detroit City Airport and implementing
apptopriate mitigation measures.
Obtaining the financing required to implement any
improvement program recommended in the Airport Master
Plan as well as to carry out all necessary environmental
mitigation measures.
POLICY 203-51: Bicycles. Consider bicycles (and mopeds) as
a viable alternate means of transportation.
METHODS:

Installing secure bicycle storage facilities at strategic
locations throughout the City.
Designing and developing a safe bicycle path network
serving main activity centers and destinations throughout
the City.
Enforcing ordinances and regulations pertaining to the
operation of bicycles that will insure safety of the
bicycle rider.

3/90

II-82

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY POLICIES
POLICY 203-52:
Air quality.
Support efforts to bring air
quality in the City of Detroit into compliance with Federal
air quality standards.
METHODS:

Using trees and vegetation wherever feasible to help
reduce and disperse air pollution.
Plant trees in
loosely arranged bands or belts around sources of
pollution.
Continuing to implement auto emissions
maintenance standards.

inspection and

Continuing to implement pollution control programs at
major industrial sources.
Implementing the fugitive dust program.
POLICY 203-53: Dangerous or offensive odors. Protect Detroit
residents to the extent possible from the effects of dangerous
or annoying odors.
METHODS:

Continuing current efforts to resolve odor complaints in
Detroit through the Wayne County Air Pollution Control
office, which has legal authority.
Continuing to enforce zoning regulations for the location
of new uses that may cause odors.
POLICY 203-54: Solid waste management. Continue to improve
solid waste collection service for Detroit residents and
businesses.
METHODS:

Continuing current collection service.
Completing the
conversion to one-man trucks, as the City budget permits.
Continuing efforts to make collections as efficient and
cost effective as possible.
POLICY 203-55:
Medical waste management.
Protect
citizens of Detroit from harm caused by medical waste.

3/90

the

II-83

�PHYSICAL

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

METHODS:

Ensuring that all medical waste management activity in
the City of Detroit is conducted in compliance with
State, County, and City regulations.
POLICY 203-56: Street cleaning. Maintain an acceptable level
of cleanliness· for all streets, alleys, and vacant lots in the
City.
METHODS:

Continuing to urge
prior to pick-up.

residents

to store

trash properly

Continuing to provide periodic or special cleaning or
sweeping, as required by sanitation conditions, within
the limits of the City budget.
Continuing to enforce City housekeeping
ordinances as effectively as possible.

codes

and

POLICY 203-57:
Hazardous waste management.
Protect the
citizens of Detroit from harm caused by hazardous waste.
METHODS:

Developing and adopting improved zoning regulations and
siting criteria to guide the establishment and operation
of hazardous waste facilities in the City of Detroit.
Encouraging the State of Michigan to refine and update
its assessment of Michigan's present hazardous waste
management capacity, and its projection of Michigan's
future hazardous waste management capacity and technology
needs, in relation to the City of Detroit's hazardous
waste management capacity and needs.
Establishing a Hazardous Waste Facility Review Committee,
by ordinance, to insure a timely, coordinated City review
and response to proposals to establish new or expanded
hazardous waste facilities.
Expanding and improving the ability of Detroit residents
and businesses
to participate effectively
in
the
hazardous waste facility siting process and other
decisions through improved notification requirements,
3/90

II-84

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

public education and technical assistance, and increased
representation of local concerns.
Supporting Federal and State initiatives to reduce the
generation of hazardous waste, and increase the use of
recycling and on-site treatment methods.
Requiring
an
effective
response
by
appropriate
governmental agencies and the hazardous waste management
industry to emergency incidents and identified sites in
need of clean-up and stabilization.
POLICY 203-58:
Water quality management.
Continue to own
and operate the Detroit water and sewerage system in
accordance with sound business and engineering principles and
in compliance with air and water quality standards.
METHODS:

Continuing present operating practices.
Updating and renovating the system as required.
Continuing to oppose legislation that could alter
institutional arrangement for management of the system.
POLICY 203-59:
Water supply.
Produce and distribute a
sufficient quantity of high quality potable water, at
sufficient pressures, to meet the needs of water users of
southeast Michigan.
METHODS:

Utilizing the existing water system as effectively as
possible.
Updating and renovating the system as required.
POLICY 203-60:
Flood insurance.
Make sure Detroit remains
eligible for any Federal funds available for flood-prone
areas. Work to reduce flooding wherever possible.
METHODS:
Making sure dykes and sandbagged areas are adequately
maintained.
Continuing efforts to expand seawalls.
Making sure drainage provisions are adequate.
3/90

II-85

�PHYSICAL

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

Encourage energy
. POLICY 203-61:
Energy conservation.
conservation by City of Detroit residents, business and
industry, and government.

METHODS:
When new buildings are being built, analyzing placement
on site, building mass, landscaping, and re l ation to
winds with the intent of maximizing energy efficiency.
Encouraging the use of public transportation service as
a low-cost, energy efficient alternative to the use of
private automobiles.
Encouraging
vehicles.

the

use

of

modern,

fuel

efficient

motor

Minimizing traffic congestion on the freeway and surface
street system.
Continuing to support efforts to control urban sprawl in
the Detroit region.
Supporting
decisions
production,
the natural

Federal and State policies and regulatory
that
will
increase
competition
at
the
transportation, and distribution levels of
gas industry.

Encouraging and assisting Detroit home owners and rental
housing
operators
to
maintain
and
improve
their
buildings.
Developing incentives for tenants in rental housing to
reduce energy consumption, i.e., using individual meters
for each apartment unit.
Encouraging the systematic replacement of older housing
which cannot be made energy efficient at a reasonable
cost with new energy-saving multi-family structures.
Supporting the use of Federal and State assistance to
relocate low-income families from housing which cannot
be weatherized satisfactorily.
Supporting the use of special promotional power rates to
encourage
economic
development
in
Detroit
and
southeastern Michigan and making more efficient use of
available power plant capacity.
3/90

II-86

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Encouraging realistic long-range planning by utilities
to reduce the possibility of rate increases to support
additional generation capacity in advance of need.
Supporting the pooled use of generation capacity by
utilities to reduce the need for plant expenditures to
meet peak load requirements and to make maximum use of
the most economical plants available to generate the
power required at any time.
Encouraging the use of existing power plant capacity in
the region by eliminating the incentives for large power
users to generate their own power.
Encouraging Michigan utilities to improve the operating
efficiency of power plants by making greater use of
cogeneration turbines or other energy conservation
techniques where feasible.
Supporting Federal and State policies and regulations
that will facilitate wholesale power sales between major
utilities.
Urging Federal action resulting in stricter standards of
energy efficiency for home appliances.
REZONING POLICIES
POLICY 203-62:
Remapping of zoning districts.
Conduct a
systematic and comprehensive study to amend the zoning maps
in order to accomplish the following.
OBJECTIVES:
Reducing total amount of thoroughfare frontage zoned
primarily for general business,while simultaneously
encouraging uses along business frontages which are less
abrasive and more compatible with adjacent development.
Zoning to match current use and promoting similar uses
where areas are in good condition.
Using TM (Transitional Manufacturing) to protect the
residents of a residential area that is proposed to be
eventually converted to industry.

3/90

II-87

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Using the Special Development Districts, SDl and SD2, to
promote intense development of apartments and offices
with compatible commercial and institutional uses along
the radial thoroughfares near the Central Business
District.
Creating buffer areas between the M4 (Intense Industry)
zoned areas and residentially zoned areas using M2 or
other less permissive districts as appropriate.
Where large existing residential areas are currently
zoned for industrial development and there is no
reasonable expectation for carrying this out in the near
future, rezoning to a residential zone appropriate for
the current uses.
Recognizing special entry areas such as near the
Ambassador Bridge or tunnel, and promoting development
which makes use of these locations, with appropriate
zoning.
Rezoning most large existing
(Parks and Recreation).

recreation

areas

to

PR ·

Near major new development projects and special features
such as the Central Industrial area or the Airport,
rezoning to capture new development potential.
Retaining the current zoning wherever possible so that
minimum disruption and fear are created.
New zoning definitions/districts.
Analyze
the need for changing zoning definitions or creating new
zoning districts to accommodate changes in lifestyles,
technology, etc.

POLICY 203-63:

Examples:
"Zero lot line'' development of residential structures.
Residential structures which have no or minimum side,
front, or rear yards but provide for light and air by way
of an "atrium".
Certain "mixed use" type development such as combinations
of residential and industrial uses in the same structure.
This could be permitted if performance standards
regarding
noise,
vibration,
odors,
truck
traffic,
radiation, etc., were met.
3/90

II-88

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

PHYSICAL

Air rights zoning to provide for development potential
in areas adjacent to high density pedestrian skyways even
above or under public rights-of-way.
Use of underground space such as the salt mines would
require special zoning.
These are extensive areas
involving square miles and are a large residual potential
development asset for environmentally controlled areas.
Other examples include earth sheltered structures, spiral
ramps, and multi-story basements.
Performance standards for home occupations. Regulate by
standards, not only by general definition.
These
standards would prohibit objectionable characteristics
such as traffic, hazardous conditions, outside storage,
and
electrical
interference and
allow
some
home
occupations in Rl and R2 districts rather than only in
R3 and more intense districts.
"Cluster housing" where a large lot is used in a highly
irregular pattern for attached uni ts with personally
controlled outdoor space and parking space.
Urban farming for profit on scattered sites within
residential and commercial areas {such as noncontiguous
orchards).
Performance standards zoning making greater use of site
plan review procedures.
The standards would cover
aspects such as light, air, noise, electromagnetic
interference, traffic, visual impact, etc.
Use of bonuses where provision of services or facilities
reduces need for zoning requirements.
For example, if
a development provides van services and membership in a
ride-sharing program, parking requirements could be
considered for reduction.
Consider using the "transfer
of development rights" principle, e.g., in some cities,
if one development does not utilize the full permitted
density, an adjacent development is often given the
opportunity to utilize this additional capacity.

3/90

II-89

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

ARTICLE 204
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS POLICIES

INTRODUCTION TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS POLICIES

While the actions, policies, and programs of Detroit's city
government are of prime importance to Detroit's residents,
property owners, employers, and employees, they are often
dictated or influenced by outside forces:
higher levels of
government and/or the economy.
These policies address Detroit's relationship to the Federal,
State, Regional, and County governments and their various
agencies which affect Detroit.
Fiscal interrelationships
between City and State are especially important.
State
actions concerning such diverse subjects as road-building and
maintenance, crime, and social welfare affect the City.
Detroit is incorporated under the Home Rule Cities Act which
requires it to perform certain functions and permits it to do
many more. The State limits the City's taxing and borrowing
power, and requires the City to have a balanced budget each
year.
FEDERAL RELATIONS POLICIES
POLICY 204-1:
Unemployment.
Seek various Federal measures
which would help solve Detroit's unemployment problems.
METHODS:

Seeking the provision of public sector jobs where the
private sector provides insufficient employment.
Encouraging Federal support for a national youth corps.
Requesting the Federal government to enact and expand
special tax credits for employing and training hard-toemploy workers.
Urging the U. S. to pursue a policy of full employment
for people already in the U. S. prior to implementation
of immigration policies designed solely to import lowcost workers.
3/90

II-90

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

Encouraging the location
institutions in Detroit.

of

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

Federal,

job-providing

Working toward a more effective and better funded Federal
job-training program. New legislation should provide for
and encourage special training for hard-core unemployed.
POLICY
204-2:
Tax sources.
The original
idea
of
Federal/State/local separation developed when Federal income
taxes did not exist and most taxing power was left to State
and local levels.
Since the Federal income tax is the most
efficient and fairest tax mechanism available, it should
continue to be used to provide needed revenue to States and
local areas.
METHODS:

Attempting to illustrate to the Federal government that
State and local taxing powers are not sufficient to
support many basic services.
Seeking Federal provision of countercyclical funding to
aid cities with the most severe business cycles.
POLICY 204-3:
Targeting Federal monies.
Some programs and
monies should be targeted directly to the neediest central
cities, not passed through State agencies.
METHODS:
Working with national coalitions of central cities to
obtain reasonable allocation formulas for grant programs.
Continue supporting the right to seek funding directly
from Federal agencies.
POLICY 204-4: Flexibility for local governments. Encourage
the Federal government to allow localities maximum flexibility
in the use of their share of Federal tax dollars.
METHOD:

Encouraging
the Federal government
not
to
impose
reporting requirements that would go beyond the intent
of Congress within particular legislative guidelines.

3/90

II-91

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

, POLICY 204-5:
Fair share.
Analyze how Federal tariffs,
income tax, and fiscal policies hurt some areas more than
others.
Urge greater equity.
Michigan should receive its
fair share, including its share of Federal contracts.
METHODS:

Promoting policies reducing Federal defense spending, but
also makinq sure Detroit business and industry receive
their share of Federal contracts.
Opposing Federal tax reform that would eliminate the
depreciation allowances or tax credits that industries
need to support their reinvestment.
At the same time,
insist that tax credits encouraging automation be
paralleled by programs to help displaced workers.
Supporting Federal anti-dumping and tariff provisions
that are critical to the survival of Detroit and Michigan
business.
Seeking revisions of Federal and State tax laws so that
enough special incentives are given for inner city
business location to offset real and perceived economic
advantages for location in . the suburbs.

Monitoring Federal government applications of the steel
trigger price mechanism on imports to make sure formulas
do not put steel coming through Great Lakes ports at a
competitive disadvantage.
Making sure Detroit receives a fair share of Corps of
Engineers
(COE) projects by encouraging Michigan's
Congressional delegation to support Corps of Engineers
projects that would aid Detroit and providing information
to Detroit Congressmen relating to potential projects the
Corps might study and fund in Detroit.
POLICY 204-6:
Deregulation.
Continue to monitor Federal
deregulation and proposals to change trade, transportation,
and freight policies.
METHODS:

in major
efforts
to
Supporting and participating
influence Federal policy that could affect Detroit
business.
3/90

TI-92

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

POLICY 204-7:
Foreign competition.
Encourage the Federal
, government to keep the U. S. economically competitive with
other nations but not at the expense of some segments of the
U.S. population.
METHODS:

Encouraging Federal subsidy of research and development
and tax laws that favor modernization of industry.
Pointing out to the Federal government that many
displaced workers still require retraining or relocation
assistance if they are to find a new place in the work
force.
Urging the Federal government to improve incentives for
"research
and
development"
and/or
industries
to
collaborate
in
research
with
one
another
and
universities.
Urge the Federal government to improve
access to foreign markets, and develop a better response
to foreign government targeting practices.
POLICY 204-8: Federal legislation and administrative rules.
Promote legislation and administrative rules which are
advantageous for maintaining and expanding Detroit's economy.
Conversely, work to prevent and/or modify legislation and
administrative rules which have an adverse affect on Detroit's
economy.
METHODS:

Promoting Federal and State legislation to increase
economic development funds for declining industrial
cities.
Monitoring the progress of new development bills through
the legislative process.
Working to have them target
funds to . cities like Detroit and, if this is not
possible, working to eliminate biases against such
cities. Working to make the programs more efficient in
improving long-term employment and to make the conditions
for expanding the funds as flexible as possible.
Monitoring and influencing the development of guidelines
by administrative agencies.
Trying to make them as
favorable as possible to Detroit, with the minimum
acceptable position being no bias against Detroit.
3/90

II-93

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

Evaluating pending industry regulation or deregulation
legislation to determine the effect on Detroit's economy.
Supporting bills which would improve Detroit, and working
to modify and/or defeat those which would hurt it.
Working to remove anti-Detroit bias
legislation and administrative rules.
Promoting· the formation of uniform
benefit programs in areas where Detroit
at a disadvantage, especially Workers
Unemployment Insurance, and a National
Plan.

from

existing

national worker
and Michigan are
Compensation and
Health Insurance

Continuing to include the members of the Detroit Econom~
Growth Corporation ls Board of Directors and the companier
and organizations they represent in the City's lobbying
efforts at the Federal level.
Continuing to work and strengthen alliances with
organizations such as the National League of Cities, the
Council on Urban Economic Development (CUED), and the
Great Lakes State Governors Conference at the national
level, and also Southeastern Michigan Council of
Governments (SEMCOG) and the Greater Detroit Chamber of
Commerce at the local level.
Monitoring proposed changes in income and other tax laws
to see whether they will help or hurt Detroit.
Continually pressing toward better distribution
Federal spending so that Michigan gets its share.

of

STATE OF MICHIGAN EXECUTIVE BRANCH POLICIES

POLICY 204-10: Equitable representation. The City of Detroit
should be equitably represented on all State boards,
commissions, and committees.
METHODS:

Establishing and maintaining a
administrative monitoring system.

comprehensive

State

Insisting that administrative positions are filled by an
adequate number of Detroit residents.

3/90

II-94

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC,lES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

Finding better means of keeping the City informed and/or
coordinating information about pending State legislation
and administrative actions. Developing a more efficient
mechanism for monitoring nonpolitical pending State
actions.
Seeing that Detroit has more representatives
on State boards allocating Federal pass-through money.
STATE OF MICHIGAN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH POLICIES

POLICY 204-11:
Intergovernmental relations.
Research all
existing State laws that affect the City of Detroit's
intergovernmental relations with the idea of formulating
possible amendments in order to give Detroit more equity when
compared to the rest of the State.
METHODS:

Assigning appropriate staff to review and analyze
appropriate State laws that refer to intergovernmental
relationships.
Drafting amendments to existing laws and/or new laws to
improve the City of Detroit's equity with the rest of the
State.
Continuing to strive to improve Detroit's equity with the
rest of the State.
POLICY 204-12:
Business attraction and retention.
Develop
mechanisms at the State level that will enable Detroit and
other older, fully developed cities better to retain and
attract appropriate development.
METHODS:

Supporting appropriate legislation that establishes new
and more effective review mechanisms at the State and/or
regional level based on the Federal Urban Impact
Procedures.
Supporting legislation that eliminates additional State
assistance for projects relocating development from one
jurisdiction in the State to another.
Supporting special Federal and State legislation to meet
the unique needs of Detroit and other older, fully
developed cities.

3/90

II-95

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

Working to broaden State services to allow funding for
necessary supportive services, such as Michigan State
Housing Development Authority (MSHDA) financed retailing
as part of a housing project.
Supporting the State's promotion of its assets nationally
and internationally.
POLICY 204-13: Revenue sharing formulas. Federal, State, and
County tax revenues should be better distributed to the City
of Detroit and.other older, fully developed cities based upon
new formulas that recognize both population size and needs.
METHODS:

Supporting appropriate legislation that mandates that the
City of Detroit and other older, fully developed cities
receive a fair share of County, State, and Federal funds,
based upon City contribution and needs.
Supporting necessary legislation and/or administrative
rule changes mandating that when recipients include both
residents and nonresidents, services and facilities shall
be financed by higher levels of government, including the
State.
Supporting appropriate legislation providing compensation
to local governments which provide community-based
residential services for previously institutionalized
persons.
Encouraging use of State funds to facilitate access of
City residents to out-State facilities and services,
where necessary.
Supporting a
study in southeast Michigan,
by an
appropriate governmental agency, of the concept of
regional tax base sharing.
Identifying benefits and
costs,
both
to
existing
tax
base
and
community
development.
POLICY 204-14: Public school financing.
Establish a more
equitable and stable means of financing public schools.

POLICY 204-15:
Crime victims.
Support State legislation
expanding reimbursement for victims of crime.

3/90

II-96

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC,lES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

METHODS:
Supporting reimbursement for psychological counseling as
well as medical costs and lost wages, and for funeral
expenses of survivors of a victim.
REGIONAL RELATIONS POLICIES

POLICY 204-16: Participation in Great Lakes Regional Boards
and Commissions.
The City of Detroit should actively
participate in all Great Lakes regional agencies and task
forces.
METHODS:

Providing information and data to appropriate
and any ongoing Great Lakes research projects.
Articulating the economic development policies of Detroit
as they relate to waterway usage.
Raising
environmental
concerns
that
affect
communities bordering the Great Lakes system.

all

POLICY 204-17:
Detroit's significance in southeastern
Michigan. The City of Detroit, being the center city of the
southeastern Michigan region and the largest city in the State
of Michigan, should retain and increase those uses, services,
and
facilities
that
are
of
special
regional/State
significance.
METHODS:

Maintaining and expanding the City's position as a center
of business and professional activities in the region and
the State.
Maintaining and expanding the variety of cultural,
entertainment, and institutional facilities that a large
core city is obligated to support.
Providing a diversified base of industries and services
for a broad and stable economy.
Making major improvements to the transportation system
to insure that Detroit remains the region's distribution
3/90

II-97

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIClES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

center, a State distribution center, and competitive in
transportation with other cities in the nation and world.
Supporting appropriate legislation to require regional,
State, and Federal agencies to provide an increased share
of the
funds
necessary to operate those Detroit
recreational facilities that are utilized by people from
throughout the region.
Promoting.~ better balance between the population served
and facility capacity both within and outside Detroit.
This can be done by utilizing for development vacant lots
already served by public facilities before any new public
facilities are constructed.
POLICY 204-18: Representation on regional agencies. The City
of Detroit should participate in regional organizations.
Appropriate governing bodies of all appropriate agencies
should be based upon the principle of "one person, one vote".
METHODS:

Participating in all agencies and bodies that address
regional and State-wide issues and that affect City
interests.
Supporting
appropriate
State
legislation
and/or
administrative rule changes that encourage units of
government over 50,000 population in the region to belong
to an appropriate umbrella regional agency.
Supporting Federal legislation and/or administrative rule
changes that encourage membership on appropriate regional
agencies in order for local units of government to
receive grants from the Federal government.
Supporting appropriate State and Federal legislation
mandating that the voting structure of all regional
agencies shall be based upon the one person, one vote
doctrine.
Continuing to initiate regular contacts and share
information with counterparts throughout the region and
in appropriate out-State communities, to foster a greater
understanding of regional and State-wide issues and their
effects upon each community in southeastern Michigan and
the State as a whole.

3/90

II-98

�INTERGOVERNMENTAL

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

POLICY 204-19: Regional public parks and recreation.
Strongly advocate Detroit's interests in regional recreation
planning and programming.
METHODS:

Securing formal City representation on the regional body
that controls the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority.
Seeking a formula that requires per-capita or percontribution allocations of resources from the HCMA.
Encouraging HCMA' s providing public transportation to its
parks in the summer.
Negotiating
with
Wayne
County
distribution of park budget.

a

more

equitable

Supporting the requirement that any Michigan city using
State or Federal funds for construction or operation of
a recreation facility must make it available to all
persons.
Seeking County, regional, or State financial support to
replace the Howell Nature Center.
POLICY 204-20:
Urban/rural balance.
National, State, and
regional land use policies should be enacted to mandate a
balance of development between central cities and the suburbs.
METHODS:
Supporting those communities that wish to limit growth.
(However, limiting growth should not be an excuse to
prevent racial and/or economic integration.)
Joining with older suburbs, environmentalists, and others
in coalitions to prevent "urban sprawl" and allow
communities to retain their existing populations.
Supporting the enactment of new State legislation and
administrative rule changes to control development
outside the existing urbanized area by limiting State
grants, amending the present State subdivision plat act
to discourage large lot rural residential development,
prohibiting development on ecologically fragile lands,
prohibiting large developments of regional significance
that are detrimental to the existing urbanized area, and
requiring full service guarantees by the developer before
new development is allowed.
3/90

II-99

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIClES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

Encouraging the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
and other regional planning organizations to revise their
policies
to
limit
growth
where
desirable,
allow
communities to retain their existing population, and keep
growth in balance.
Limiting growth should not be an
excuse to prevent racial and/or economic integration.
Supporting
necessary
State
legislation
and/or
administrative rule changes to require commun : ties to
provide for balanced land use development consistent with
adequate local or County land use plans which meet
regional and/or State criteria.
POLICY 204-21: Equalized development costs. Develop a means
by which it will become at least as advantageous for
developers to build in, and home owners to purchase in, the
City of Detroit as in the developing suburbs.
METHODS:

Supporting changes in Federal policies, such as lower
interest rates on Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
mortgages for housing in central cities, tax incentives
to develop in the central city, and other changes as
necessary, to make it at least as attractive for
developers to build in the central city as in the outer
suburbs.
Supporting changes in Federal policies as needed to make
it as advantageous for all types of developments to be
located in central cities as in other "urban" areas.
POLICY 204-22:
Regional growth.
Infrastructure or public
facility extensions beyond the existing urbanized area should
be allowed only if growth in population cannot be accommodated
in the existing urbanized area, or facilities are needed to
solve major pollution problems or remedy health hazards.

METHODS:
Supporting the development of a new Regional Sewer
Service Area Plan to supersede existing plan.
The new
plan should be based upon the premise that the amount of
land to be served by sewers should be correlated with the
newly
adopted
regional
population
and
household
projections, or if the remedy to a major pollution
problem of health hazard requires a sewer solution.
3/90

II-100

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES
Appropriate facility
accordingly.

plans

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
should

also

be

amended

Supporting appropriate legislation to prohibit the
Federal government and the State of Michigan from funding
new infrastructure projects that serve population growth
only. This is already done in the case of sewer service
dollars.
Supporting appropriate State legislation and/or necessary
administrative rule changes to require that the cost of
new sewer and water projects be borne only by those who
will benefit directly.
Bonds for these projects should
be floated based only upon the faith, credit, revenue,
etc., of the area that will be directly served.
Supporting appropriate State legislation to require that
all other solutions to a pollution problem shall have
been exhausted before a new sewer is constructed.
Supporting appropriate legislation to require that public
utility companies charge a more equitable cost of service
for transmission to new developments that are distant
from generating, switching, and storage facilities.
Supporting
legislation
requiring
that
future
infrastructure extensions shall conform to a local plan
based upon realistic population projections.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE POLICIES
POLICY 204-23:
Free Trade Agreement.
Capitalize on the
economic and development opportunities for the Detroit and
Windsor region, especially regarding the Free Trade Agreement,
in order to facilitate the channeling of increased foreign
trade through our North American /Canadian border.
METHODS:
Encouraging joint development opportunities with Windsor,
working together to establish the region as a "new
international marketplace".
Encouraging State of Michigan subsidy of the development
of a World Trade Center in order to establish a physical
presence that reflects the magnitude of trade and
transport opportunities and facilities in the region.
3/90

II-101

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

Marketing the region as a hub of international trade,
since
the
Detroit/Windsor
region
is
the
largest
international trade region in North America.
Targeting the attraction of industries to Detroit that
could particularly take advantage of the Free Trade
Agreement.
Encouraging the start of trade programs, to host foreign
trade delegations (Minsk, Africa, etc.), and to analyze
import and export opportunities, as a result of the Free
Trade Agreement.
Encouraging the location of foreign consulates and trade
missions in Detroit.

3/90

II-102

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

URBAN AREAS

ARTICLE 300
INTRODUCTION TO URBAN AREAS

The following Chapter III of the Detroit Master Plan of
Policies is focused on policies for specific geographic areas
of Detroit.
The entire City is divided into ten geographic
divisions called sectors.
In addition, there is one special
area,
the Riverfront, whose boundaries overlap several
sectors.
The sectors contain between 50,000 to 200,000 residents.
Moreover, each sector is further divided into subsectors.
Altogether, there are 52 subsectors.
The content is organized by sector, with sectors presented in
alphabetical order by name. Within each sector, policies that
apply on a sector-wide basis are given first, and a subsector
index and rezoning concept map are included.
Following the
sector-wide policies are subsector policies with maps of
existing and future land use for each of the 52 subsectors.

3/90

III-1

�c ...... ..,.,

a•~T

...... ~ . ,
\JILLAQW

SECTORS
and

SUB SECTORS
IN THE CITY OF DETROIT

Airport Subsector .....•.......••••• 302-7
Boynton Subsector ...... ~ ........... 309-16
Brightmoor Subsector ....•.......... 310-9
Brooks Subsector ..•................ 310-12
Burbank Subsector .•.....••......... 306-11
Butzel Subsector ..•..............•. 302-8
Cerveny-Grandmont Subsector ........ 307-9
Chadsey Subsector .•................ 309-14
Chandler Park Subsector ••..••••.... 302-9
Cody Subsector ....•................ 310-10
Condon Subsector ..•..........•..... 309-9
Conner Subsector .......• . ...•...... 306-12
Davison Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305-9
Denby Subsector .............•....•. 306-13
Durfee Subsector ..........•........ 304-9
East Riverside .•..•..•..•.•.••..••• 302-10
Evergreen Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310-7
Finney Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306-7
Foch Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302-11
Grant Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306-9
Greenfield Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307-6
Harmony Village Subsector .•..•...•. 307-10
Hubbard-Richard/Corktown Subsector 309-12
Indian Village Subsector ........... 302-12
Jefferson-Mack Subsector ........... 302-13

Jeffries Subsector ....•...•.•....•• 309-8
Kettering Subsector .....•..•.•.•.•. 302-14
Lower East Central Subsector ....••• 303-10
Lower Woodward Subarea ............• 311-9
Mackenzie Subsector ................ 304-7
McNichols Subsector .... ~ .........•. 307-11
Middle East Central Subsector .....• 303-9
Middle Woodward Subarea .......•.••• 311-10
Near East Riverfront Subsector ....• 303-11
Nolan Subsector .......•...........• 305-7
Palmer Park Subsector ... ............ 307-8
Pembroke-Bagley Subsector ..•..•...• 307-7
Pershing Subsector ...............•• 305-8
Redford Subsector ................•. 310-6
Rosedale Subsector .............•••. 310-8
Rosa Parks Subsector ......•.••••••• 304-10
Rouge Subsector ................•... 310-11
Russell Woods Subsector .......•...• 304-8
Springwells Subsector .........••..• 309-13
State Fair Subsector ........•.••..• 305-6
St. Jean Subsector ...............•. 302-15
Tireman Subsector ..........•.....•. 309-10
Upper East Central Subsector •.•.•.. 303-8
West Riverfront Subsector .•......•. 309-15
Vernor-Junction Subsector •...•.•••• 309-11

�'
DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

ARTICLE 301
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LOCATION AND EXTENT

The Detroit Central Business District (CBD) is the downtown
area of the City, generally bounded by the Fisher Freeway on
the north, the Chrysler Freeway on the east, the Lodge Freeway
on the west, and the Detroit . River on the south; it also
includes the area south of East Jefferson to Orleans on the
east, the area south of West Jefferson to Eighth Street on the
west, as well as the area west of the Lodge, specifically
including the State of Michigan Plaza and Wayne County
Community College. Altogether, this area covers 1.35 square
miles, or about 860 acres.
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT FEATURES AND IMPORTANCE

The Detroit Central Business District serves all of southeast
Michigan and it is both historically and functionally the
heart of the Detroit metropolitan area. The Central Business
District is the seat of government for the County of Wayne and
the City of Detroit as well as headquarters for u. S.
government and State government in Southeast Michigan. It is
headquarters for the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
and other regionally-focused agencies.
Downtown Detroit is
also a judicial center with more than 120 judges, magistrates,
and referees presiding in County, State, and Federal Court
facilities.
Downtown Detroit has the densest concentration of office space
in the State with about 17 million square feet occupied.
Headquarters of Michigan's largest banking and financial
institutions are housed in the Central Business District as
are the headquarters of Michigan's major daily newspapers.
The ci vie spirit of Detroit is symbolized by the Central
Business District and it provides the primary urban image of
the City and of the region to residents and visitors alike.
Downtown is a "gateway" to Detroit. Physically, it is linked
by radiating freeways and streets to the region and by tunnel
to Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Functionally, downtown is the
3/90

III-2

�'

RIVER

81

,,,-,

"'

B2
83
84

86

"'

R2
R3
R.4
R.5
R.6

RESTRICTED BUSINESS
LOCAL BUSINESS/RESIDElfTIAL
SHOPPING DISTRICT
GENERAL BUSINESS
GENERAL SER-IICES
SING/.£·FAMID' RESIDElfTIAL
TWO-FAJrlll.1 RESIDElfTIAL
l.J:N(-DENSITY RESIDElfTIAL
THOROUGHFARE RESIDElfTIAL
MEDIUIJ·DENSITY RESIDElfT /Al
HIGH-DENSITY RESIDElfTIAL

GENEVJJZEO

REZONING CONCEPT
Ml
M2
M3

M4
M5

WI/TED INDUSTRIAL
RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
llfTENSNE INDUSTRIAL
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL

TM
WJ

TRMSfflONAL INDUSTRIAL
WATERFROlfT INDUSTRIAL

PR

PN?KS and RECREATION

SPECIAL DEVELOPMElfT
!resident/al.with llmlted commercla/J
S02 SPECIAL DEVELOPMElfT
(commercial, with /Im/fed resident/al)
504 PROPOSED SPECIAL DEVELOPMElfT
RNERFROlfT MIX USE
S01

PO PLANNED DEVELOPMElfT
PC PUBLIC CElfTER
PCA RESTRICTED CElfTRAL BUSINESS

CBD SECTOR

�,
DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_
t'

7'\

primary convention,
southeast Michigan.

meeting,

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

and entertainment location in

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT GOALS

The goal is to enhance the role and functions of Detroit's
Central Business District in all areas so that it continues
to be competitive with and closely linked to other urban
centers throughout the world. This goal will be accomplished
by obtaining significant increases and improvements in
administrative functions such as media, communications and
corporate headquarters; the residential base; conventions and
tourism; retailing; national and international business and
banking; circulation within and to and from the CBD; and the
environmental and esthetic appeal of the downtown area as a
major urban place with a high level of excitement, interest,
and vitality.
CENTRAL

BUSINESS

DISTRICT

PLANNING

ISSUES

AND

F'O•roRE

POTENTIALS

Though Detroit is still the region's and the State's major
center for administrative functions and services, with the
increasing decentralization of many of these activities there
is a need to make special efforts to insure that the downtown
maintains its share of these functions and services as well
as expand its supporting services.
The benefits derived from the strong convention, tourist,
recreation, and cultural sectors of the CBD need to be further
capitalized on and expanded upon, especially increasing the
number of hotel rooms.
There needs to be a greater emphasis on the growing importance
of communication, the media, and technological advancements
in the CBD.
The retailing areas of the CBD which have weakened in recent
years need to be revitalized to provide improved services to
downtown employees, residents, nearby workers, and visitors.
An increase in the number of residents in the CBD and its
immediate environs is an important factor in attracting and
supporting new retail establishments.
With the construction and operation of the Downtown People
Mover (DPM), transportation access to and circulation within
the CBD has
improved.
Future extensions and pedestrian
linkage with the Detroit People Mover as well as provisions
3/90

III-3

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

for adequate and appropriately priced parking facilities are
still needed.
Because of downtown's role as the State, Region, and the
City's major activity center and symbolic image-maker, there
needs to be special attention given to environmental and urban
design concerns so that the CBD will continue to be a special
experience for Detroiters and visitors.
POLICY 301-1:

· central Business District - Economic Base

Take steps to insure that downtown Detroit will remain
competitive with, and closely linked to, other major urban
centers throughout the country and the world.
Insure that development in the CBD emphasizes the kinds of
activities that relate to a strong competitive position in
the national and global economy such as international banking
and
finance,
administration
headquarters
for
major
corporations, import-export trade services, and exportable
business services.
POLICY 301-2:

Central Business District Culture &amp; Tourism

Insure that downtown Detroit, together with the Cultural
Center area, remains the focus of activity - on a regional
and State-wide basis - relating to cultural and civic events,
urban entertainment and recreation, and all other functions
which will enhance the area as a desirable location for
tourists, conventions, and urban life and activity generally.
Intensify
the
existing
concentration
of
convention/tourist/recreation/cultural
facilities
and
activities in the downtown area, especially making the best
use of the expanded Cobo Convention center, Renaissance
Center, the People Mover, and the existing special areas such
as Greektown and Bricktown.
Encourage new construction of
hotel space near Cobo Center, and promote an increase in
restaurants, bars, night clubs and other entertainment in and
near this area; continue the ethnic festivals and concerts,
the Freedom Festivals and parades, the boat and auto races,
and replicate these types of events at smaller scale
throughout the year; expand the level of service provided by
tour boats and buses, trolleys and tramways, including service
to Windsor convention and foreign shopping opportunities;
encourage the establishment of an auto museum in the area or
adjacent to a Downtown People Mover station.
3/90

III-4

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

Support the continued growth of the Theater District in the
, northern CBD area between Grand Circus Park and the Fisher
Freeway.
Improve landscaping in the area. Expand financing
mechanisms
to promote entertainment,
concerts,
theater
productions.
Encourage the bars, restaurants, and other
entertainment and fitness facilities to promote the area and
jointly recognize the increased access provided by the
Downtown People Mover station, trolley, and mini-bus service.
Promote downtown as a "fun" area with an increasi--ng supply of
organized and spontaneous events always occurring, including:
jogging, boating, walking: displays, art exhibits: art/music
schools
by
artists-in-residence
living
in
lofts
and
storefronts: outdoor cafes near activity areas: protect from
weather by covered walkways, tunnels, gallerias, tents,
balloons, inflatable structures, domes, landscaping.
Portray downtown as the location of the State and region to
experience and view the most
technologically advanced
developments.
Encourage international conferences and coordinate activities
with Canada: promote development of a Detroit-Windsor tramway
as well as a ferry connection.
Encourage each national trade and professional conference to
open their displays to a wide public.
Showcase rotating
industrial displays.
Increase special cultural events such as the opera, ballet,
modern dance, jazz festival, artists fairs, gospel songfests.
Seek methods of helping hotels to attract patrons during offpeak and weekday convention periods.
POLICY
A.

301-3:

Central
Framework

Business

District-Urban

Design

PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS CONCEPT

Promote downtown Detroit as a "walking city" through the
creation of a superior pedestrian environment that builds upon
development already in place and takes advantage of the area's
compactness.
Implement the concept by promoting the strong
activity anchors of the Theater District in the northern
portion of the area and linking it with activity centers in
the southern portion of the CBD (Renaissance Center, Hart
3/90

III-5

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

Plaza, Cobo Center) by strong pedestrian pathways with special
, street furniture and other amenities.
In addition to promoting major activity centers and linking
them by pedestrian pathways, establish a variety of downtown
neighborhoods, each with its own unique character.
In each
of these downtown neighborhoods, establish a key street or
other central place where local services, shops, restaurants
and other commercial activities, as well as the more dense
housing facilities, can cluster, providing a focal area of
intense pedestrian activity and a sense of urbanity and
vitality.
Where feasible, People Mover Stations should be
physically incorporated as an element of the neighborhood core
facility.
C.

STREET LEVEL ACTIVITY

Provide
for
continuous
pedestrian
interest
i.e.,
storefronts, restaurants with windows on the street and
sidewalk cafes in warm weather, art galleries, display
windows, etc. - along the linkage streets, particularly the
primary axes, so that there is a sense of progression along
these routes through an uninterrupted sequence of varied and
intense activity. Skywalks should not complement street-level
pedestrian activity, except to improve public safety.
D.

OPEN SPACE

Provide for
"people-oriented'' landscaped open space in
carefully planned locations.
In general, provide urban open
space where it will clearly be an integral part of the
pedestrian experience or a significant destination, but not
where it amounts to ''dead space", interrupting continuity.
Give special priority to the enhancement of Grand Circus Park
in conjunction with major new entertainment development in
that area.
E.

AMENITIES

Provide adequate street lighting at the pedestrian scale, and
use lighting creatively to enhance special building facades
or other interesting features.
Provide coordinated street
furniture such as benches, planters, drinking fountains, waste
receptacles, etc.
Include sculpture, fountains, statues,
murals, etc.,
to enrich the urban environment.
Where
possible, provide adequate public restroom facilities.

3/90

III-6

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIE5-

..

F.

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

ARCHITECTURE AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Encourage architecture that represents enduring quality.
Insure compatibility /esthetic harmony between new and existing
structures. To the extent feasible, give high priority to the
preservation of older buildings.
Encourage restoration,
rehabilitation, and reuse of older building facades to reflect
the
original
architectural
character.
Consider
permitting/encouraging arcaded sidewalks on certain streets i.e., where such treatment would not violate desirable setback
lines.
Consider developing gallerias - enclosed pedestrian
streets - particularly in conjunction with People Mover
stations.
Encourage public circulation within existing and
future buildings.
Encourage canopies over public walkways
where appropriate. Provide weather-protected transit waiting
areas.

G.

VIEWS AND VISTAS

Strengthen the visual access to the River from various
locations in downtown.
Establish other view corridors
focusing on important buildings, statues, parks, and other
esthetic features.

H.

GATEWAYS

Provide "gateway" treatment at major entrances to the CBD,
emphasizing changes
in scale,
land use,
architectural
character, and intensity of activity.
Make use of pylons,
landscape treatment, special lighting, paving materials,
banners, etc., to provide definition and contrast. Consider
gateway treatment at the following locations:
Michigan at
Lodge, Grand River at Fisher, Woodward at Fisher, Gratiot at
Chrysler, East Jefferson at Chrysler, and West Fort at Lodge.
POLICY 301-4:

Central Business District Public and Private
Office Development

Downtown Detroit should remain the focus of financial,
administrative, judicial, and office center activity for
Detroit, the metropolitan region, and the State.
Conserve and protect the existing major concentration of
financial establishments near: Griswold and Fort; Renaissance
Center; and the government office concentrations nearby;
Woodward and Jefferson (City-County node); Lafayette/Michigan
and Lodge Freeway (State-Federal node); Beaubien and Gratiot
(Justice Center). Encourage expansion of these activities.
3/90

III-7

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

, Encourage any new government offices to be located close to
the Downtown People Mover stations.
Provide
supplementary
transportation
devices
for
CBD
employment/service centers beyond easy reach of the Downtown
People Mover extensions.
The outlying centers include:
IRS/State/Bell Service Center; Edison/El ton Park; Madison
Center.
Support special environmental amenities including extensive
urban landscaping and modern office renovation so as to
encourage the greatest possible efficiency and creativity of
those who work here and their visitors.
Insure other office
amenities are available, such as fitness clubs, convenience
shopping, and day-care centers.
Insure that an adequate supply of parking decks and garages
is available within and near the most central area so as to
serve the short-term client, visitor, and constituent parking
needs.
Promote the concept that most longer term transportation needs
of employees and managers will be served by mass transit and
parking areas accessed from the Downtown People Mover. This
will reduce the dependence upon the auto and parking demand
in the most congested areas of the Central Business District.
Those governmental and financial functions which it would be
better to distribute for ease of service to their clients
should not be concentrated in the most central portion of the
CBD.
They should be located to be more central to their
clients or constituents.
Recognize the importance of larger outdoor rally-oriented
spaces for political and social purposes. Specifically have
designed and built at Kennedy Square an improved facility to
better fit this purpose.
Support the provision of "people
watching'' spaces as well for spontaneous meetings.
Recognize and promote the international aspects of finance
since this is a growth sector and downtown has international
companies.
Utilize tax incentives and other devices to encourage
employment and skill training of Detroit residents and make
special efforts to increase the proportion of Detroit
residents in CBD jobs.
3/90

III-8

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

POLICY 301-5:

District

Central
Business
Technology

Communications

Encourage development of state-of-the-art communications
systems in and for the CBD to establish Detroit as a leader
1.n technology development and the CBD as a showcase for
information and telecommunications technology. Encourage the
Medical Center and institutions in the Cultural area to do
likewise.
Promote the recognition that one of the primary purposes of
the Central Business District is communication, and take every
step possible to support and facilitate fulfilling this role.
Recognize that the area between West Lafayette and Michigan
and Third is largely devoted to establishments and facilities
specializing in various aspects of communication: telephone,
television, and newspapers.
Support intensification and
expansion of this grouping.
Encourage the growth of new communications and technology
oriented businesses in the CBD; seek a greater variety of
trade journals; try to attract industrial film makers to the
CBD; and encourage the use of the new communications
technology.
Seek methods to provide incentives to promote building owners
to improve communication and information capabilities.
POLICY 301-6:

Central Business District - Retail Development

Strengthen retailing activities of all kinds in the CBD.
Promote the conservation and revitalization of existing major
retailing nodes:
Woodward ( near transit stations or near
employment/service
centers);
Greektown;
Renaissance
Center/Millender
Center;
Broadway-Randolph;
Washington
Boulevard.
Promote the areas near
the People Mover stations as
appropriate for specialized retailing and services, each area
developing its own theme and character.
For each station,
promote covered walkways, gallerias, pedestrian routes with
retailing along each side.
Promote the construction of major and renovated new intense
mixed-use structures in the area, including the Hudson's
building, Kern block, Crowley's block, Monroe block, and
provide a large amount of new retailing space, hotel, office,
3/90

III-9

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

·• ·

housing, and parking
. indoor spaces.

space as

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

well

as

public outdoor

and

Encourage a major expansion of the parking validation program
so that shoppers are assured of a convenient and adequate
supply of lower-cost short-term parking spaces.
Support careful planning for convenience shopping for downtown
residents, including shopping within residential structures.
Plan for a removal from commercial use and conversion to other
uses those areas known to have minimal market potential. Uses
to which the obsolete retail space can be converted include
offices, apartments, lofts, incubator space for new services.
Give special attention to the particular shopping needs and
problems of the various shopping segments, including (a) the
over 400,000 Detroit residents located within a five-mile
radius with incomes exceeding $ 2 billion; ( b) the 110,700
downtown employees and 60,000 nearby area employees; (c) 10
million or more annual visitors.
Each group has different
peak-time shopping needs and a 9-to-5 day often does not fit
these needs; (d) adult households and single-parent households
now account for almost 80 percent of Detroit City households
and have very different shopping needs; (e) Windsor, with its
200,000 residents, Detroit's largest suburb and close to the
CBD is a special market to be served, depending on exchange
rates, duties , and goods availability.
Encourage the 24-hour retail and service node near Griswold
and Michigan to expand in scope and scale as working hours
become more extended and downtown residents increase.
including more
Encourage a lively street life,
musicians, flower, fruit, and craft peddlers, and
artists.

street
street

Improve
all-weather
environments,
expanding
gallerias,
connected stores, covered plazas, utilizing more windbreaks
and planning to make the best use of sunshine for outdoor
areas.
Provide electronic informational directories at many locations
within retailing areas to help shoppers find the type of store
ad merchandise desired.
Coordinate special shuttle and minibus service from nearby
employment centers including:
Wayne State, State office
3/90

III-10

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

center/West Side industrial; medical/cultural institutions;
Eastern Market; East Riverfront.
POLICY 301-7:

Central
Business
District
Housing
and
Neighborhood Development
Encourage major new increases in the residential base of the
CBD.
Recognize and promote the concept that downtown residential
living is appropriate and should be encouraged almost anywhere
in the CBD (with the possible exceptions of the financial
institutions, governmental institutions, and within retailing
areas themselves.) Recognize, also, that many of the features
which are desirable to have in a CBD are not possible without
residents.
Increase the level of CBD resident population to at least
15,000
through
conversion
of
existing
buildings
and
construction of new buildings, including: upper stories along
Woodward and other shopping districts and near People Mover
stations; along Washington Boulevard and Bagley; adaptive
reuse of historic off ice and retail buildings; at primary
"gateway" points, such as Michigan/Lodge, Grand River/Fisher,
Gratiot/Chrysler, Fort Street/Lodge; along the east and west
riverfront. Provide environmental improvements as necessary,
such as landscaping, berms, careful lighting, appropriate
surface treatment.
Insure that services for downtown residents are available,
including convenience type shopping, recreation, fitness,
parking, security, education (especially including job skill
upgrading, and adult-oriented programs).
Promote urban design improvements which will aid in creating
the most lively, enjoyable, and stimulating adult-oriented
living environment.
Be careful about relationships of
residential to other uses so that each can be complementary
and mutually supportive.
Make use of rooftops, balconies,
small plazas, and solariums to make use of the outdoors.
Encourage a variety of housing types, including condominiums,
cooperatives, lofts, high-rise and mid-rise, mixed use, etc.,
as well as a mix of residents by age, race, sex, income.
Make special efforts to insure that parking is available near
each apartment area, reserving spaces in adjacent lots and
parking structures.
3/90

III-11

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES-

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

Promote a strong relationship of adjacent residential areas
, with the downtown through special promotions,
flyers,
institutional offerings, and transportation connections: West
Riverfront; Corktown; Focus; Cass; Brush Park/Medical Center;
Eastern Market (lofts); Lafayette Park/Elmwood; Rivertown.
POLICY 301-8:

Central Business District Transportation System

Promote efficient intra-city circulation into and out of the
CBD for all travel modes.
Continue the policy of making the CBD the focus of transit
activity in Detroit and the region.
Promote construction of a light rail mass transit system from
downtown Detroit northward along Woodward and along Gratiot.
Connect the light rail system with People Mover system in the
Central Business District.
Upgrade regional bus service and encourage its use.
Promote efficient intra-CBD circulation for pedestrians,
bicycles, automobiles, buses, and all other appropriate modes
of transportation.
Promote use of People Mover and interface with parking.
Implement plans for an improved walkway system, include
elevated and below-grade walkways, where these would not
detract from street-level activity.

Make further improvements to bus stop and layover locations.
Provide better orientation devices for motorists and provide
improved traffic management.
Provide for a comprehensive parking policy where primary
emphasis will be on the elimination of surface parking
facilities in core areas of the CBD and the location of new
parking facilities on its periphery, while also facilitating
short-term parking near shops and restaurants. Facilitate the
efficient and swift movement of traffic between entry points
and parking.

3/90

III-12

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_
POLICY 301-9:

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

Central Business District - Parking System

Provide an adequate supply of well-located parking for
retailers and shoppers while also providing necessary parking
for employees and residents.
Promote use of the People Mover.
Insure inexpensive parking
near the People Mover stops, and continue to explore use of
an assessment district to pay for short-term free parking
(assessment based on benefit).
Encourage long-term parking in areas other than intense retail
areas, providing shuttle service where necessary. Encourage
a safe and secure environment near the retail and parking
areas.
Keep the parking areas clean and remove the most
insensitive intrusions, such as junk piles and building
remnants.
Standardize signs. Try to close the short-term parking space
deficit in the CBD core area.
Encourage short-term parking
that is in very close proximity to shopping facilities and
services and with rates as inexpensive as possible.
On the
other hand, insure that "dead spots" are not created within
high intensity shopping areas.
Encourage the use of public transit for access to and travel
within the CBD.
Encourage use of car pools and van pools.
Address the parking needs for conventions and tourism.
POLICY 301-10:

Central Business District - Public Protection

Promote a high level of control and prevention of crimes and
fires.
Expand upon the Neighborhood Watch concept with Apartment
Watch, Business Watch, and Vertical Watch in high-rises.
Insure that design of structures such as parking structures
does not create blind spots or other areas of low visibility.
Encourage builders and developers to utilize the latest
techniques in security devices.
Educate the public to be
ever-vigilant at special events and other areas where large
crowds are gathering.
Enforce housing and building codes for the provision of
noncombustible construction sprinkler systems and fire control
3/90

III-13

�GENERALIZED

EXISTING LAND USE

t./f'f
.J/lr

OFFICES,

USE
Central Business District •••.••••• 301-11

III-13A

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

systems, fire-warning systems, and adequate escape routes, and
retrofit existing structures for compliance.
Educate CBD users and residents for evacuation techniques,
fire control techniques, and fire prevention techniques.
Insure that adequate and appropriate fire-fighting equipment
is at all appropriate sites including attended parking lots
and other parking facilities.
Provide for and enforce
adequate removal of rubbish and combustibles.
Insure that adequate lighting is provided to help create a
more secure environment.
POLICY 301-11: Central Business
Rezoning Concepts

Utilize zoning
downtown.

as

a

tool

to

District

help

implement

Land

Use

and

policies

for

New office and retail development, including areas near the
People Mover stations, should be developed very intensely and
with surface-level activity. Surface parking lots should not
be required as part of each new development, but provided
commercially or in common structures, with non-surface parking
being encouraged in new development.
In the most intense central core area of the CBD, parking
should be encouraged to be provided in structures. The areas
along the riverfront, the Civic Center, and adjacent areas
should be given special attention for compatibility of design.
Consider rezoning the areas near the People Mover stations
and Greektown which are currently B6 (General Services
District)
to a more appropriate zoning classification.
Parking is not to be required of each developer on-site nor
within 100 feet.
Parking needs to be provided "in common",
preferably in structures.
Consider rezoning the areas on the northeastern and eastern
edges of the CBD which are currently B4 (General Business) to
encourage ultimately increased residential construction with
compatible institutional and commercial uses.
Parking will
continue to be permitted here.
All new development will be
required to provide on-site parking or within 100 feet.
Encourage residential construction and conversion.
Retain
present zoning in most areas, however; expand area included
in Public Center Adjacent zoning classification. Provide for
3/90

III-14

I,

�PLANNING UNITS
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
A.

Detroit Edison/Elton Park

B.

North Grand Circus Park

C.

Communications/Mass Media/
Convention Facilities

D.

Washington Boulevard/Bagley Area

E.

Major Shopping District

F.

Justice Center

G.

Financial/Government District

H.

Bricktown/Millender Center

I.

West Riverfront Area

J.

Civic Center

K.

Renaissance Center

Central Business District ••••••••• 301-12

III-14A

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

sign review in high priority areas, especially from People
, Mover stations.
Provide for plan review for all surface
parking lots; require landscape or other screening.
POLICY 301-12:
A.

Central Business District Planning Area
Policies

Detroit Edison/El ton Park Planning Area
Cass, Bagley, Freeway boundary)

( Grand River,

East of Third, continue the corporate campus development.
West of Third, develop a corporate campus related to new hightech industries and new low- and medium-rise residential
buildings. Provide transit access to the Detroit People Mover
by a spur or minibus. Provide sound barriers or soundproofing
from freeways.
Landscape surface parking areas.
Insure
pedestrian access to areas across freeways for services.
Retain Elton Park as a recreation area.
B.

North Grand Circus Park Planning Area (Fisher Freeway,
Adams, south side Grand Circus Park, Adams, Clifford,
Middle, Grand River)

Give priority to the development of an intensive residential
community and an entertainment district in this area,
especially along and near Woodward Avenue. Since there must
be extensive parking in this area, give special attention to
special landscaping.
Develop theaters,
nightclubs,
restaurants,
and similar
entertainment uses as well as various types of medium- and
high-density apartments, offices, and supporting commercial
services. Give special priority to the enhancement of Grand
Circus Park.
Provide for any future development around the
Park to help complete a sense of enclosure, i.e., new
buildings fronting on Park, Witherell, or Adams across from
the Park should be large (8 stories or more) and should not
be set back from the street.
The People Mover station in the Whitney Building gives special
focus to the southern edge of this area, which will be
appropriate for a comparison commercial node.
In the area near Witherell, encourage retention and expansion
of institutions and their services.

3/90

III-15

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

c.

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

Communications/Mass Media/Convention Facilities
Planning Area (Bagley, Cass, Michigan,
Washington Boulevard, Congress, Sixth,
Jefferson, Eighth, Fort, Bagley, and Michigan)

'I

Encourage
additional
communications
and
media-oriented
development as well as residential, convenience retail, and
supporting commercial uses. Specifically, develop mixed-use
projects related to communications technology and including
apartments, offices, and service commercial at Michigan and
Third, Michigan and First, and Lafayette and Third.
Develop
hotels, entertainment, restaurants, etc., related to the new
expanded Cobo Hall, heavily concentrated along and/or related
to Washington Boulevard.
Procure and reserve sites as needed in this area near Cobo
Hall for parking structures. Parking structures will need to
be provided here and elsewhere in the area to serve the high
density of uses here and nearby.
Provide minibus service or a Detroit People Mover spur to
areas more than 1,000 feet from Detroit People Mover stations.
The People Mover stations at Fort/Cass and Michigan/Cass
provide special accessibility to this area and should be
capitalized upon by high intensity development including
retail services.
D.

Washington Boulevard/Bagley Planning Area
(Middle, Clifford, Adams, Grand Circus,
Washington Boulevard, alley west of Woodward, Michigan)

Develop primarily as a residential community having a variety
of housing types and income groups; also, include mixed
residential/office,
retail
and
hotels.
Concentrate
development generating
intensive street activity along
Washington Boulevard. Establish State Street as a secondary
linkage street between Woodward and Washington Boulevard, and
enhance this also as a pedestrian environment.
Enhance the
Capitol Park area as a small-scale convenience retail node to
service
residents.
People
Mover
stations
are
at
Woodward/Grand Circus and Times Square, and Michigan and Cass,
which areas are especially appropriate for high-intensity uses
and retail development.

3/90

III-16

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES
E.

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

Major Shopping District Planning Area (Grand Circus,
Adams, Brush, Monroe, St. Antoine, Macomb, Chrysler,
Lafayette, Randolph, Cadillac Square,
alley
west
of
Woodward)

Re-establish Woodward Avenue as a major shopping street in
the City.
Develop the Kern/Crowley/Monroe block as an
intensely developed mixed-use project with retail, hotel,
office, residential, and parking. Design this development to
serve as a major regional indoor/outdoor shopping center,
closely integrated with the Woodward Avenue shopping mall.
Encourage new shopping, eating and drinking, entertainment
and cultural facilities throughout the area.
Give special
support to Greektown, and expand westerly to eventually link
up with Cadillac Center area.
Encourage new residential uses throughout the area, especially
in rehabilitated older buildings and upper stories over retail
frontages.
Promote distinctive residential apartments and
special office and commercial development in the upper stories
along Woodward Avenue.
Encourage the provision of adequate short-term parking.
Encourage a vastly expanded parking validation program.
Encourage entertainment uses related to the theater district
in the Madison Avenue area.
Provide for the revitalization
and growth of the Harmonie Park area as an arts district,
encouraging galleries, studios, art supply stores, studio loft
apartments, and related development. Enhance Harmonie Park.
Encourage development across from the Park along the east side
of Randolph, and insure that it provides a sense of enclosure
for the Park.
Once this is developed, open the Park
physically and visually to the east.
Encourage the reuse of Hudson's department store building for
office, parking, ground floor retail, insuring that ground
level pedestrian interest,
especially on Woodward,
is
maximized.
F.

Justice Center Planning Area (Adams, Chrysler, Macomb,
St. Antoine, Monroe, Brush)

Continue and expand institutional uses.
Improve pedestrian
access between the justice buildings at Gratiot and
St. Antoine to Greek town, to Madison Center, and to the
Downtown People Mover stations.
Encourage residential uses
in the buildings in the Madison Center area if and when
3/90

III-17

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

warehousing uses are no longer in demand. Encourage parking
decks. Provide a "gateway" design treatment along Gratiot.

G.

Financial/City-County
Government
Planning
(Michigan, Cadillac Square, Randolph,
Jefferson, Woodward, Larned, Washington
Boulevard)

Area

Locate new government administrative offices in this area.
Continue to support this area as the financial and legal
office core of the CBD. Improve the street-level pedestrian
environment, especially with landscaping, display windows,
and other amenities.
Complete the proposed development at
the
Larned-Bates
site with offices
with
ground-floor
commercial.
Improve Kennedy Square as an outdoor rally area
with more trees, more land, better seating, and development
of a water theme. Encourage an intensive multi-use structure
on the former Greyhound garage site related to Larned-Bates
development.
All parking in this area should ultimately be
in structures.
H.

Bricktown/Millender Center Planning Area
(Lafayette, Chrysler, Jefferson, Randolph)

Develop new institutional, office, residential, and related
commercial uses.
Brush, and to
lesser extent Beaubien,
should be reinforced as pedestrian routes between Renaissance
Center and Greek town.
Preserve existing buildings and the
character of Bricktown.
The three People Mover stations in this area should be
promoted
as
development
incentives
encouraging
high
intensities of development. A hotel should be encouraged to
be built at Lafayette/Beaubien.
I.

West Riverfront Planning Area (Jefferson, Sixth, Congress
(extended west), Third, Detroit River)

Support the continuation of future phases of the Riverfront
Apartments West residential development.
Encourage the
development of a major hotel on the site adjacent to Joe Louis
Arena.
Continue to develop upper level skywalk connections
to the Downtown People Mover station.
Provide for the
adequacy and continuity of the riverfront pedestrian/bicycle
path through this area, and improve pedestrian access from
West Jefferson and Sixth Street to the core of downtown.
Support apartment development on remainder of the Free Press
site.
3/90

III-18

�DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES_

, J.

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

Convention and Civic Center Area Planning Area (Congress,
Washington Boulevard, Larned, Woodward, Bates extended,
Detroit River)

Encourage a joint public-private effort to build the proposed
Detroit/Windsor aerial tramway. Insure that the heliports are
readily accessible to Renaissance Center and Cobo Hall.
Provide computerized electronic directional directorie s at key
locations. Strongly encourage new hotel facilities. Provide
for the continuity of the riverfront pedestrian/bicycle path
through this area.
Improve pedestrian link across Jefferson
into Hart Plaza. Establish a skywalk system linking Cobo Hall
to the east. Promote development to capture advantages of the
People Mover station at Larned/Griswold.
K.

Renaissance Center Planning Area
Detroit River, Bates extended)

(Jefferson, Orleans,

In the area immediately east and south of Renaissance Center,
encourage
multi-use
development
such as
high
density
residential/commercial incorporating health and recreation
facilities, restaurants, and hotel, retail, and office uses.
Provide
for
the
continuity
of
the
riverfront
pedestrian/bicycle path on the River's edge with easy access
from Jefferson. Encourage the use of mass transit. Encourage
sufficient parking as an integral part of all new uses.
Encourage any non-intensive reuses of industrial buildings
east of Renaissance Center to be short-term in anticipation
of a future market for more intensive uses.
Study the
feasibility of a marine transportation passenger dock in this
area with shuttle service or provide a weather-protected
walkway to the Renaissance Center and the Renaissance Center
Downtown People Mover station.

--

3/90

III-19

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

ARTICLE 302
EAST SECTOR POLICIES

EAST SECTOR LOCATION AND EXTENT

The East Sector is generally bounded by Mt. Elliott on the
west, McNichols, Conner, and the Ford Freeway on the north;
Philip and Alter on the east: and the Detroit River on the
south.
As of 1980, the area was home to 158,315 people.
There were 53,296 households.
The East Sector includes nine subsectors: Airport, Kettering,
St. Jean, Chandler Park, Butzel, Indian Village, Foch,
Jefferson-Mack, and East Riverside Subsectors.
EAST SECTOR PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS

By all statistical measures: population, household income,
housing occupancy, employment, the East Sector has experienced
serious decline.
The outward appearance of neighborhoods
within this Sector vary enormously from the well-kept
residences of historic Indian Village and Berry Subdivision
to numerous vacant or abandoned areas, both residential and
commercial, scattered throughout the Sector.
The massive
new
industrial development
known
as
the
Jefferson/Conner Industrial Revitalization PRoject generally
located between Mack, Freud, St. Jean, and Conner is the major
new development of the area and should have a significant
impact on the economic base of the City and especially on the
economic well-being of this Sector.
The possible expansion
of City Airport would also have a major effect on the economic
and physical development of the East Sector.
In effect, the
City Airport and the industrial development help to form a
major industrial corridor which bisects the East Sector. This
industrial corridor connects with the major proposed and
existing
residential,
commercial,
and
recreational
developments along the east riverfront to form an inverted "T"
of defined areas of activity.
Planning objectives are to continue with
the orderly
development of the Jefferson/Conner Industrial Revitalization
Project, to develop and implement the Master Plan for City

--

3/90

III-20

�SUBBECTCRB

AA

1 Inch •S000tt.

l.Lnorth
acret

=

O

112
1
1112
~=---:::.
C::::::::::.

o.o

o.5

1.0

1.s

2

miln

2.0

c::=:::.,---,=-..r=='

lr.Uomet.,.

EAST SECTOR

Airport Subsector ... .- ..•.•••••••••. 302-7
Butzel Subsector .•..•.••.•••••••••• 302-8
Chandler Park Subsector ••.••••••••• 302-9
East Riverside •••..••...•....•..••. 302-10
Foch Subsector •.••..••..••••..•.•.. 302-11
Indian Village Subsector ..•..••.•. 302-12
Jefferson-Mack Subsector .•.......• 302-13
Kettering Subsector ..••..•.••...••. 302-14
St. Jean Subsector .•...•..•••...... 302-15

�--

I I

RE

GENERALJZED

ZONING CONCEPT
SINGLE-FAM/
TWO-F Ml/LY ~E;(DSIDENTIAL
LON·DENSfTY
ENT/AL
THOROUGHF~ES/DENTIAL .
MEDIUM-OEN E RESIDENTl/!J..
f/lGH·DENS,;;rr
RESIDENTl/ll
RESIDENTl/!J..

RI
Rl

R3
1W
RS
R6

RESTRICTED
LOCAL BUSI BUSINESS
~1i:~/NG i~f,ti;fSIDENTIAL
GENE/ii_ BUSINESS
SERVICES

81

82
83
114

86

UMrTED
I
RESTRIC;muSTRIAL
GENERAL 1fo//DUSTRIAL
/NTENSN
STRIAL
SPECIAL TNou!NOUSTRIAL
STRIAL

Ml
M2
M3
M4

7

MS

WI

TRMSrTION
WATERFRO:t INDUSTRIAL
INOUSTR/Af.

PR

PAAKS and RECREATION

CJ

AAEA UNDER STUDY

TM

SPECIAL DEV
lresldenllol.
{ PEC/Af. DEVELOPM
commerclo/J
commerclal,wltn /Im ENT
SD4 PROPOSED SP£ /fed resident/al)
RNERFRONT M1f'1fsfEVELOPMENT

SDI

s02

PD

wif/,9(:t//f,f

PLMNED DE

PC PUBUC CE VELOPMENT
PCA RESTRICTED
NTER
CENTRAf. BUSINESS

'

''
I
I

I

''
I

.

:'
''

I

EAST SECTOl
--------·----- ---

--------- ----- ------ ------ -----

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

Airport, and generally to alleviate the problems of housing
deterioration and abandonment, and upgrade the neighborhoods
and shopping areas of the East Sector.
Careful planning on the part of the City, the East Sector
residents and community groups and the private sector
employers will be required to help redevelop the area's
neighborhoods and to restore sound shopping.

POLICY 302-1: East Sector General Policies.
Vigorously promote efforts to bring about close cooperation
between City agencies and business and community groups as an
essential
resource in the revitalization of declining
neighborhoods and preservation of those which are still
intact.
Land Use - Upgrade the physical appearance of the East Grand
Boulevard streetscape, providing a park-drive treatment north
from the Belle Isle Bridge.
Develop comprehensive street
graphics treatment on E. Jefferson, including consideration
of mechanisms to remove rooftop signs.
POLICY 302-2:

East Sector - Residential Development.

Implement various programs to deal with blight an.d vacant
lots, including removal of unsafe structures and residential
relocation utilizing the City's inventory of vacant, taxforeclosed houses.
Encourage and assist housing repair,
conservation, and rehabilitation by assuring the availability
of financial support such as home and business improvement
loans at reasonable prices. Remove unsafe and blighted
structures, assemble land for development, preserve and
rebuild neighborhoods and, when necessary, relocate families
into other neighborhoods with better social and physical
conditions. Implement the Law Department's program to locate
and assess the owners of unkempt and dangerous buildings and
abandoned lots for the cost of demolition, cleaning, or
maintaining that real estate.
POLICY 302-3:

East Sector - Commercial Development.

Develop the Jefferson-Chalmers commercial area.
Encourage
facade improvements along Gratiot, Van Dyke, Jefferson, and
Harper.
Improve both the appearance and the function of
commercial areas. On currently owned Airport land and on land
that may be acquired, increase the capacity of Detroit City
Airport to accommodate and enhance an economic revitalization
3/90

III-21

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

of the East Sector of the City.
Seek additional air
. carrier(s) for basing at Detroit City Airport.
Develop a
strong marketing program for the City Airport and related
development. Recycle surplus commercial buildings.
POLICY 302-4: East Sector - Industrial Development.

Promote the East Sector as a prime location for both the
traditional industries which have been in this area and new
growth industries. Provide an adequate inventory of sites of
varying sizes for industrial development.
Make a special
effort to improve job opportunities and related support
services for female heads of households. Promote programs to
train new workers and retrain the labor force.
Assemble
parcels for industrial parks in existing industrial areas.
Demolish isolated vacant plants with no economic potential.
Recycle surplus industrial buildings. Develop an industrial
park near Detroit City Airport to accommodate airport-related
businesses and industries.
POLICY 302-5:

East Sector - Transportation System.

Improve public transit in both the Gratiot and Jefferson
corridors.
Consider bicycles as an alternate means of
transportation.
POLICY 302-6:

East Sector - Recreation System.

Acquire and develop new recreation land, particularly on the
riverfront, in renewal areas, and in under-serviced areas.

3/90

III-22

�'

AIRPORT

\=·
_ :RLM::
.........

SUBSECTOR

~

4---

INST

0

~
;

~

t
O

! ••
I•

·-

INP;,-

o.o

,.I-__-

.25

.JO

-

,.o

.7J

.,.

c.=.:::J

i=:::J

RLM

EAST SECTOR

---

=;:

--L.ANauaa

C.!.-

J:

RL-io,_q,_
RLM---'YRM--.. -.,,--.uai
RH-'Y . . . - . . i

IND

• RLM

Bi_,

.·-:-:
-·
..
·-·
i==·1

•••t:_

SRC-~-.-....i~
INST-1-ttu&lt;1a1a1
IND-Glnonl--=-a.i
L't IND- u-,,c --=---i
TRC- ThOroU9hfare -- • ident.ial-

•

INOi" ...

•;j.:

C011a11rcial

MC ..

RLM/V

...,cro-c..l

SC-~~

: T:

RLC-

....i ~ ~

~ o-c..l

GC--~
CC--a-=ai

.

+.

'

-.

1,'J
~

c==~

+-

.
///
.
.

@

1 indl•2000ft,

-L!

-t

MIJR•--...-..i
MP- Major Park
RC- ..creau.on

Area
Under
Study

POS·

1...-

Open

0s1- Open Sp• c•-Inst.aut.ional
V• Vacant.

CEM-..._,

*-

Playtield

AIRPORT

.····-.

SUBSECTOR

lR~

.......~----···:
...

0

3w

OSI

.

ij

.
.J..
.--•7.............
. RLM ..j
~--··: ~

,,.

0

r===:::,
o.o

,---,= =

.21

--

1

===:,

.so

.n

1.0

EAST SECTOR

--

-~&amp;.ANDU-

RL-i:...-q,~
ALM-.....-.. - . . . . , ~
RM--,_,.,...,,~
RH-B1_,..,....,Mol4ont.ul

SRC-

-.,..i - . - u o i ~

INST - i n . u - - . i
IND--~
L't IND- u-,,c In&lt;Oaual
TRC- ThoroughfaN lleaidant.ialCc.Nrcial

MC-.,.,cr~

GC·--

SC-si-:,.&amp;lo:..n::w
RLC-~~-

CC--Cman:1A1

MUR-,.._u.~
MP- KaJor Park
RC - bcrHt..on
POS- P e ~ t Open Space

OSI· Open
V-

Sp•c•-Inat:it.uuonal

Vacant

CEM·-,,

*• PlayUald
Airport :Subsector ••.••••••••.•.•••• 302-7

III-22A

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

AIRPORT SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Airport Subsector is bounded by McNichols, Conner, Edsel
Ford Freeway, and the eastern boundary of Hamtramck. Detroit
City Airport is located within this subsector, less than five
miles northeast of Detroit's Central Business District.
Today, the Airport's primary role in the community is that of
a corporate aviation facility with air cargo services and
limited short-haul air carrier services.
In this r ole, the
Airport is a major asset to businesses of all sizes in the
Detroit area.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, AIRPORT SUBSECTOR

About 85 percent of the housing units in the Airport Subsector
were built between 1915 and 1934. The mean value of Airport's
single-family house is considerably lower than the City-wide
average. Vacant housing rates among the residential areas in
the subsector are higher than the City-wide rate.
Detroit City Airport has recently expanded its commercial
flight activity. An Airport Master Plan process is currently
under way, the results of which could have a major impact on
the physical and economic structure of the Airport Subsector.
POLICY 302-7:

Airport Subsector Policies.

The portion of the Airport Subsector located east of Van Dyke
and north of Gratiot is currently (beginning in June 1989}
being studied to assess the potential for upgrading Detroit
City Airport to become a reliever airport for Detroit Metro.
The conclusion of the study will produce a Detroit City
Airport Master Plan.
For the area west of Van Dyke to Mt. Elliott and from East
McNichols to the Edsel Ford Freeway, generally encourage more
industrial uses.
Housing ihould be buffered from heavy
industry by a corridor of light industry extending from
Grinnell to Harper, generally along the St. Cyril-GeorgiaSherwood alignment with heavy industry to the west and housing
to the east.

•

3/90

III-23

�•

BUTZ L

GC

-

/

RH - Hi9' c-.a,.ey _,_.,_.,

-,;..,X-·

-, .,~•·······

.

..\ R';~\
·-.. ..
\

, -.:,.,

._,. ~

/4
\R\
L ••

RL- taw Dooeiey ~
RLM- ~.. c-.a,.ey _,_.,_.,
RM-,_..,.,..,,_&lt;&gt;-~

_...~V .~

. ~· ,: .

ND\

INST- lnlltituba&gt;ol
IND- __,_ ~
LIIND-Li¢&lt;Imaual

RLM

~

.,,,..,,. -•

,~ .

.,\~••

••
...;.::.. •• •
.. c·
\ M',
.'.~.
\ __ • , &lt;: · •,lv.:::.NST
\\iv.
f. •~••,, •••
•\-.,-.. \ ••·· RLM .:' . •••••
· ·· \

\

: \

...✓,

.

\,.• ..);,•.:· . \.
·•

••

\

$..··-::..•·•::

\:-:. -\ ••\

~

..••

~ •••
INST
\., .l•••

~
,~.. . \
RLM ~ ••

GC- GononJ. o:.o.dAl

cc---

•••• RM

V'"-~ ••.-~·... !.·\ GC

I •·.

•• ~ .;. RM V \

•• ._·. ·.•.

-:

. ...

•• IND •

. ••

TAC- T!IOrou9hfare ..•1.dea.tial-coaaarcial'
MC- ..; a r SC-"-1Al.RLC-~-

\ • -.. ~RH&amp;INL . ,

.:.

·. ·,. ...

..

..

GC

,.,-

RLM/'•• -.:·- ••• ••1-, Y, , . · , \ ••··••,,.I_;•
• le
\
V \ \ '• ."· ·
'• ~ •,

· ..\
\••j~D \ '
\\c
:..&gt;,"°"RH
\ /'· ..
\::'. . . .. ..
..••,; . .,,,
.,/
\.~... \ ...
.
\

~~

SRC- "-1Al.

~

\ '\❖•

MUR-111,m,-~
POS- ,..,...,.nt _.. s,..ce
0S1-epen Space-Institutional
V• Vacan t

CEM·c.m.t.ry

*·

-~-~~
,•£✓•- INST

Playfield

H&amp;INST

0

.2,
.,.
.---.

0 ,0

·"............,.•

-

EAST SECTOR

BUTZEL

-----

~...-uaa
Rl-

taw a.wiey _ , _ . . . ,
___,_,. ama.ey ~

RLMRM--,;.. a . . . e y ~

RH-1119\....,_.,~
SRC- ._,_.i - . - . . . . i - . . . . i
INST- :io.u_,....i
IND-....aiLI IND- Liont TAC-

Thoroughhn llaaidential-CciaMreia l

MC- *:rc:r a:..&amp;.~
SC-._...iRLC- ~
.'l,xal CtzlmrCi&amp;l

GC- c...r&amp;1

~

cc--~

MUR-..,-,u.~
MP- Ma J or Park
RC- Rec:uat10n
POS- Permanent Open Spac:.
OSI - Ope n Spac•- I na u s:. 1.1t:1 0na l
V-

CEM-

*-

Vaca :i t
c-u..-y
Phyfield

AA

l'=nonh

•

11ncn a2ooott.

-

0

o.o

,---, =

.25

.50

.71

,.o

EAST SECTOR

Butzel Subsector .••.•••.••..•.....• 302-8

III-23A

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

BUTZEL SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Butzel Subsector is bounded by Mack, Van Dyke, East
Jefferson, and Mt. Elliott.
The subsector includes a range
of housing types, commercial and retail uses along Mack,
Kercheval, and East Jefferson, and industry in the
Mt. Elliott industrial corridor.
Institutional development
includes the Butzel Family Center, the Health Department's
Child and Family Center on Kercheval, the Detroit Riverview
Hospital, and 1:he nursing home and adult foster care home
district along East Grand Boulevard. A portion (about half)
of the West Village neighborhood is within the subsector's
boundaries.
The Butzel Subsector is adjacent to the east
riverfront and within sight of Belle Isle.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, BUTZEL SUBSECTOR

Industrial development in the Mt. Elliott corridor is some of
the oldest in Detroit.
The majority of the housing in the
Butzel Subsector also dates from the early 1900 1 s and has been
passed on to low-income families.
It is very typical for
housing of this age to require a substantial amount of
maintenance.
Loss of population at the scale experienced in the Butzel
Subsector has tended to reduce the ability of the area to
support local shopping, schools, and other services.
Nearly 50 percent of the housing units in the Butzel area are
in small, multi-family structures; the remaining housing units
are evenly divided between single-family and large apartment
buildings.
Only about 40 percent of the housing units are
owner-occupied,
which presents
a
problem
for
housing
rehabilitation programs.
There is considerable variation in the condition of housing.
Housing located west of the Mt. Elliott industrial corridor
(near Mt. Elliott) is in generally poor condition.
Housing along the eastern edge of the corridor is also in poor
condition.
There is some mixture of housing and industry
along this edge.
Housing conditions improve as the distance from the industrial
corridor increases. The large residential structures lining
East Grand Boulevard from Jefferson to Mack are in generally
good condition.
This street includes large single-family
homes, apartment buildings, and compatible commercial uses

•

3/90

III-24

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

such as clinics and funeral homes.
Many of the large homes
have been converted to commercial/institutional uses such as
' nursing homes and adult foster care facilities.
Housing in the area between Grand Boulevard and Van Dyke is
in generally fair to poor condition; the loss of housing to
abandonment and then demolition has damaged this area,
especially near Mack, Jefferson Avenue, and along Van Dyke.
BOTZEL SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Butzel Subsector is in a unique location as it contains
the "gateway" to Belle Isle and is across Jefferson from major
development sites on the near east riverfront.
The
Subsector's location should be taken full advantage of with
new residential/commercial development taking place on the
sparsely occupied parcels near Jefferson west of E. Grand
Blvd. extending redevelopment northward from the riverfront.
The more intact housing, benefitting from the new development,
should be reinforced through rehabilitation and rebuilding
programs and adequately buffered from the Mt. Elliott
industrial corridor.
POLICY 302-8: Butzel Subsector Policies.

In the area generally bounded by Jefferson, Lafayette, Mt.
Elliott, and the alley west of East Grand Boulevard, encourage
major
redirection
to
high-intensity
commercial
and
residential.
Assemble land into larger parcels for this
purpose.
Encourage major change in the area west of the
Boulevard frontage.
In the area west of Concord, north of
Kercheval, continue housing uses with major rehabilitation
and rebuilding.
Between Kercheval and Lafayette, redevelop
as moderate density residential.
(To the east of East Grand
Boulevard, less dramatic changes in land use are foreseen.}

•

3/90

III-25

�PARK

CHANDLER

---

~I.AND ....

RL-1.a&lt; ..... , ~
RLM--..-...,~
RM-_.,._,,,,~

-~

RH-111-,. - . ,

~

SRC-~~~
INST- ,.,,...=-ai
INO-Gomn.l~
LJ:IND-L14&gt;&lt;Imauul

TAC- Tborouqhfar• Maidantial-~aial
MC-o.i.. a-cial
SC-....,...ia--ci&amp;l
RLC-~-

GC---.i~

cc---

MUR-t11.-u,o~

POS· ........... _ ..

Spac,,

OSI- Op41n Spae• -Inatnutional
V- Vacant
CEM-~

*-

Playfield

1 UICfl I

1000ft.

-

0

o.o

.25

SO

75

,.o

......

··-

c=::.r===t:=.:.5c=::::i

EAST SECTOR

PARK

CHANDLER

--- U-

•--- ...
~"-""" ~
RL- 1a, - . . , , , , ~
RLM- - 1 . a ema,q, ~
RM-_... ....,_,,,,iui-.w

RH-111-,.-.. ..

~

SRC- - - . i ~ - - = a 1
INST- x - . - - . i
IND--..aii:.........i
LJ: IND- 1.:.-,.. --=--i
TRC- Thorcuqhfar• AHid • nt.id•C0111119rci • l

MC-o.i ..
SCRLC-

o:-:a&amp;1

~~

....,..i o-,:w

CDonrciA1

GC---.io:-rcw
CC- c,,,,.rua, .,,.__'"CW
MUR--u-~
MP- N.aJor Park
RC- Recreauon
POS- hra&amp;nent Opan Space
OSI - Ope:, S;&gt;•c•-Ir.sutuuona l
V- Vacant

CEM-"-to.ry

1

•

lftCfll

f

1000ft .

-

0

o.o

2!i

SO

75

1.0

··-

c:::::::F==1:-=:::F:=::,

EAST SECTOR

Chandler Park Subsector .......•..•. 302-9

III-25A

.....

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

CHANDLER PARK SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

.The

Chandler Park Subsector is bounded by the Edsel Ford
Freeway on the north, Alter on the east, Mack on the south,
and Conner on the west. The 1980 population of the Chandler
Park Subsector was 17,917.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, CHANDLER PARK SUBSECTOR

Housing quality varies considerably. The best housing in the
subsector is along Chandler Park Drive and Dickerson.
Conditions in the remainder of the residential area north of
Warren and east of Dickerson are not as good.
The majority
of residential structures are single-family detached and twofamily flats primarily of brick construction. While there are
a
number of four-flats and small multiples scattered
throughout this portion of the subsector, the largest cluster
of apartments is on Lakewood just north of Warren.
South of Warren near Alter, the housing condition is fair.
However, toward Conner, conditions decline to fair to poor,
and in some cases the residential development on some blocks
is in poor condition.
At the intersection of Warren and Conner is located the
Parkside Homes public housing project.
This project is a
combination of rowhouses and apartments in fair condition.
The buildings are of brick construction and structurally
sound.
However, maintenance problems have led to a decline
in the appearance of the structures, mechanical problems in
the project (primarily heating problems), and poor general
upkeep of the project grounds.
Many units are vacant, and
this has led to entire buildings being vacant and boarded.
The Housing Department is currently in the process at
implementing a Master Plan to revitalize Parkside HOmes.
CHANDLER PARK SUBSECTOR GOALS

The City will have a major influence on the future of this
subsector.
Chandler Park, the revitalized Parkside Homes,
new capital improvement projects and rehabilitation efforts
should be used to stabilize the remaining residential areas
and make them attractive to persons of modest incomes who may
want to live near the numerous employment centers nearby.

3/90

III-26

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLic_JES
POLICY 302-9:

EAST SECTOR

Chandler Park Subsector Policies.

Acquire any land needed for City capital improvement projects
south of Warren, rehabilitate existing housing, and promote
a market for new housing.
Revitalize Parkside Homes, in
accordance with the Housing Department's Master Plan for
Parkside, including upgrading of mechanical and electrical
systems.
Renovate Parkside Recreation Center, make it
accessible to the handicapped, and cover the outdoor pool for
year-round use.
Along the East Warren business frontage,
institute a commercial stabilization project and encourage
compatible development, including residential, on vacant
parcels. Institute a commercial stabilization project on the
Mack frontage, and encourage rehabilitation of the residential
units on the upper floors.

3/90

III-27

�\

:.~\\

GC

.
___\.l-~'.::'.::::..:.:..~•~•-·••••....•· ...\;·
',_

.-

•••••••••••••••••••

.....~.

I'

GC

··..

...

•

--:'&gt; ,:·

~

;.

RM/V

\_

.:~

,····{•••'i..'

....•·

'c

••••••

•••

RC

\

IND

_._..
ECl8T1NG'-AN01.a11

RL- ..., ,,....,. -......u..1.
RLM·--&lt;Y~
RM,-..-,,,.~
RH---&lt;Y~
SRC- -..i - - - , - - - = - i
INST- n . t i - - . i
IND--.iRC- Recreation

...-.

•••

\

\ ••••• R
.C

---

-------------

\

RL
•• ~

•••••••••••••••

••••••

.•

\ ••••••

TRC-

RIVERSIDE

--····

••••••••
••

------

EAST

••••

V

......... .\.._

\••••••••••••••••••••••

'•:••
•••. V \ \,. .......,-:~~•\

•·.

v•

RLM

....

,• c'"

~·~. .·. ...:··

.,...,.:

RLM/V . - /
✓··
••

··..

RM/V

-~ ; ; • ~ );
•·

..

\

..... '., V •••••••••• •• ••

...V

...-····

\

••::.-.:__ _ RC

-- ~-

.. ..
•

Tboroughf•r• Mddantial•

Ccaaercial
11111Cfl r

MC- .-icr em..d&amp;l
SC--..io-c..i
RLC-~~
GC--.i.~
CC·-&lt;&gt;aard.&amp;l
MUR
_ _ _ ___,

2000ft .

-

0

POs-~-•-n•~~

0.0

.H

.50

~

.75

t.O

.---,

OSI• O'pen
V•

Space-In • tl.tuu.onal
Vacant

CEM·'--'Y

*-

EAST SECTOR

Playfield

\
\

~

DETROIT

EAST

RIVERSIDE

---

RL .

...,_,,,.-.-uai

••

~

RM-----,,,.~
RHSRC- 9pocl&amp;l - . - . w . ~
INST-r-u--.i
IND--.i-

Bi"'_.,.~

U:INO-u,,,.-.m&amp;1

East Riverside .•

Thcrcughhra RHidential-

C~rcia.:

SC-~o-eai

-~LANDU

RLM- ,__.., ,.,.,,,,,.

TRC-

RIVER

RLC-~11-1a:nmrc,.,.i
GC- - . i o - e a i

CC--e&gt;ma=-.1
MUR- u. - . - u a i
MP- K&amp;Jor Park
RC- Racre • ti.on
POS- Perm.anent Open Space
OSI- Op•n Spac•-lnsutuuonal
V-

Vacant

CEM·c-..-,,

•.•••. 302-10

0
0.0

.H

50

~

75

1.0

.---,

EAST SECTOR

III-27A

.....

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

EAST RIVERSIDE SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The East Riverside Subsector is bounded by the Detroit River
on the south, Marquette on the west, Jefferson Avenue on the
north, and the City limits (just east of Alter Road) on the
east. It is approximately 1,500 acres in size, of which about
360 acres is devoted to industrial and commercial uses, while
the remainder is residential.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, EAST RIVERSIDE SUBSECTOR

As is the case throughout the East Sector, housing in the East
Riverside Subsector is old.
The mean appraised value for
single-family homes in the Subsector is somewhat lower than
the City-wide average. The vacancy rate in the East Riverside
Subsector is higher than that for the City. The vacancy rate
of multiples, buildings with five or more housing units, is
nearly double the City-wide rate.
The City has undertaken the Jefferson-Conner Industrial
Revitalization Project to allow for the redevelopment and
consolidation of the Chrysler Jefferson Assembly Plant north
of Jefferson with a supplier industrial park south of
Jefferson to Freud between Conner/Clairpointe and St. Jean.
The area to the south of Freud and immediately west of the
Conner Creek plant is proposed for high density residential.
The waterfront portion of this area is proposed to be an
expansion of the City's existing recreational activities.
EAST RIVERSIDE SUBSECTOR GOALS

The East Riverside Subsector should benefit greatly from its
location on the riverfront and as the site of a portion of
the Chrysler expansion and Jefferson-Chalmers projects. This
subsector is envisioned as having a series of parks, marinas,
and water-oriented development at the River's edge and a
strengthened industrial corridor capitalizing on the Chrysler
expansion serviced by a ring road. There will be a compatible
mix of new and existing housing in the remaining areas of the
subsector, and the Jefferson-Chalmers plan will be realized
with housing
of
various
types
and densities
and
an
institutional campus adjacent to a convenience shopping center
on Jefferson.

•

3/90

III-28

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

POLICY 302-10:
A.

EAST SECTOR

East Riverside Subsector Policies

Riverside Residential and Chrysler Area
(Area
bounded
by
Marquette,
E.
Jefferson,
Conner/Clairpointe, and the Detroit River harborline.)

This area includes the Riverside neighborhood, the Sindbad's
and Kean's marinas, the Chrysler industrial area, and the
Detroit Edison-Conner Creek area.
Promote the development of this area as a River-oriented
community. Retain and expand marina functions and promote new
high- and medium-rise apartment developments related to the
boating areas. Insure adequate provision of school, shopping,
and recreation facilities and services for the population of
this area. Retain and further develop public access areas at
the foot of Marquette, Fairview, and St. Jean for passive,
River-related
activities
including
fishing,
viewing,
picnicking, and boat launching. Expand the quantity of boat
wells and marinas, and explore the possibilities for expansion
through construction beyond the harborline, movement of the
harborline, and extension of canals. Protect against flooding
and shoreline erosion by the construction and maintenance of
seawalls, building above the floodline and regrading land
levels, where needed, particularly . near the Harding Canal.
Pr_ovide adequate thoroughfares utilizing St. Jean, Freud, and
Conner/Clairpointe as secondaries, and Marquette and Fairview
as collectors, all with Park Drive treatment.
Encourage revitalization and redevelopment of the residential
area east of Waterworks Park using a mixture of rehabilitation
and new construction where appropriate.
As redevelopment
catalysts for this area, utilize both the canal and new
marina-oriented residential development along the River.
Provide local streets as needed, but design to minimize truck
and outside traffic circulating through the residential area.
Encourage development of the area near the current EdisonConner power plant with increased public access to the River's
edge to encourage residential development to the east and
west.
Insure that coal is handled and stored in a manner
which will minimize negative impacts on surrounding areas.
Encourage development of employment
intensive
industry
generally between St. Jean and Clairpointe and northerly of
the Edison-Conner Creek plant. Insure that adequate space is
reserved for suppliers of the major new industries north of
Jefferson.
All industrial truck traffic is to be contained
within a ring road system to consist of
3/90

III-29

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

St. Jean, E. Jefferson, Conner-Clairpointe, and Freud. Remove
all housing from the industrial area described above.
' Encourage improvement of air and water quality conditions
immediately west of Conner Creek so that River-related uses,
including boating and housing, can be developed.
The
Jefferson-Hart fire station, Engine 32, should be rebuilt in
the vicinity of its current location with at least secondary
thoroughfare access.
B.

Jefferson-Chalmers area.
(Area bounded by Conner-Clairpointe, E. Jefferson, City
limits
near
Alter
Road,
and
the
Detroit
River
harborline.)

This area is a designated Neighborhood Development Project and
includes Grayhaven, Gregory and Bayview marinas, and a series
of public parks.
Continue support of the Jefferson-Chalmers area as primarily
a
lowto
medium-density
residential
community
with
reservation of the River's edge as public access areas.
Continue support for residential rehabilitation.
Encourage
the removal of seriously dilapidated structures and promote
the new development of a variety of housing types including
single-family detached units, townhouses, and apartments.
Promote development of housing with a water orientation
utilizing Klenk Island, Grayhaven, Windmill Pointe, and
parcels near Conner and Fox Creeks.
Support the development of an institutional campus in the area
bordering E. Jefferson between Conner and Drexel, extending
south of Freud, to include facilities for education, training,
and recreation.
Support the development of a convenience
shopping area near Jefferson and to the east of the
institutional campus.
Resolve the water quality problem of
Fox Creek in cooperation with Grosse Pointe Park and Wayne
County through wastewater facility construction or other
appropriate methods.
The entire seawall at the eastern edge of Fox Creek along
Alter, to which the City of Detroit retains an easement,
should be replaced to withstand a 100-year flood. Regrade the
land level and require all new construction to be above flood
level lines.

3/90

III-30

�,

--·····...... \

•••••~•••••••• :: RM

•••••••

......······················· ..::~·-··-t·····1 5,
i,;;
,. ~

RM

RLM

: ..!--tNST

• :

~~

\~

~-----~-

RLM/V

-~-d---:.}

I

: _.................~• : .·====-=-==-!¥,.~.;••• \ - IND

~

-,,or.

\

\

••'lt•~~, , ~-=1-=-"1
••••••••••••
c:~ R H
! \
RM/V

_;;~

GC/V .

\•••••••:::;r~::~v\ ...
.....
....
RH/V

.......

\

--~..-

RL---q,~
RLM•,-..-q,~
RM•--ty~
RH-111..,_q,~
SRC- 9Pod.ol - . . . . ~
INST-1-1IND-~,__......,_
LJ: IND- u,,,. Imbtt1A1

----

LAND U

:

:
:

•

c:.,__,.--~=-~

~

••• r

--•idaratial-

C:cmnercial

MC- i.Jar ~
SC-_,..i~
RLC-~~
GC-~~

cc---,.

20

MUR-...-uoo~

POS- Mna.aneDt

.....---,
.25

. .so

=

.71

1

1. 0

c:::=-f===L-=:F=--,

EAST SECTOR

Playfield

TRC-

I incll •2000 tt .

12

o.o

c,pen spac.

OSI- Open Spae• -Insu.tut i onal
V- Vae • nt
CEM--.,,

Thorcughfar • Jla • idAntial-

Caa.rcJ.al

MC.-nCII

~~!"•~•••••••••••••

•••• .-• .

*-

FOCH

-1~

~- .,..

----

TAC- Thoroughfare

FOCH

=

~/V:
,,-,,;-::-~=~-

Najar ""10m'CW.

~ft

1 incft ,2ooott .

...

sc. . . . . , ~

••

RL-""' - t r ~
RLM- .__._ - t v ~
RM--..-ty~

RH-a1,,,omm.tr~
SRC- - , ~~
INST-1-1IND-......i_.....,
LJ: IND- u,,,. Izdaai&amp;l

RLC-~a-ew
GC-c--a1~
CC--em-=w.
MUR--o.~
POS- ..nuu,anc. Open space

OSI-Open
V•

Sp • ce-1nst1.tut i onal

..,
0

o.o

,----, =

.25

. .so

.7S

1. 0

Vacant

CEM·-,,

*- Playfield

Foch Subsector ..•..••.•••.•........ 302-11

EAST SECTOR

III-30A

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC.IES

EAST SECTOR

FOCH SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES.AND FEATURES

The Foch Subsector is bounded by Mack Avenue to the north,
Conner to the east, Jefferson to the south, and Fischer to
the west. The Subsector is approximately 1,200 acres in size,
of which 350 acres are devoted _to industrial and commercial
uses while the remainder is residential.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, FOCH SUBSECTOR

The City has undertaken the Jefferson-Conner Revitalization
Project which allows for the redevelopment and consolidation
of the Chrysler Jefferson Assembly Plant north of Jefferson
between St. Jean and Conner. The project includes a ring road
and landscaped buffering to separate the industrial activities
from surrounding residential development.
The residential development of the Foch Subsector is generally
a mixture of single-family detached and two-family flats.
Apartment buildings are scattered throughout the Subsector;
however, they are generally concentrated in the blocks between
Kercheval and Jefferson. There is also a small concentration
of apartment buildings on the blocks between Mack and
Charlevoix immediately west of St. Jean.
Recent losses of
small apartment buildings have been very high throughout the
area.
Along Jefferson there are several large apartment
buildings. Much of the residential development on Kercheval
and Jefferson is at high density.
The structural condition
of housing in the Foch Subsector varies from fair to poor.
Throughout the Subsector there are many vacant structures
(some are boarded, and some are not), burned-out structures,
many vacant lots, and many structures with substantial
structural defects,
which leaves many of
them beyond
rehabilitation.
The area bounded by Fischer, Mack, Cadillac Boulevard, and
Jefferson Avenue is in a very distressed state.
There is a
substantial amount of vacant land, many vacant structures
(some are boarded and some are not) and burned-out structures.
While many of the apartment buildings and some other
residential structures are of brick construction and could be
rehabilitated, many of the residential units in this area have
substantial structural defects which leave them beyond longterm rehabilitation.
The portion of the Subsector bounded by Montclair, Mack,
St. Jean, and Jefferson has similar conditions to the area
above. The remainder of the Foch Subsector, that area bounded
3/ 90

III-31

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLig:'.ES

EAST SECTOR

by Cadillac Boulevard, Mack, Montclair, and Jefferson, is in
fair condition. While there are signs of blight evident, such
' as vacant structures, vacant lots, and buildings with
structural defects, this area is not as depressed as those
areas described earlier.
FOCH SOBSECTOR GOALS

The Foch Subsector needs to continue the major rebuilding
effort
which
has
begun
with
the
Jefferson/Conner
Revitaliza~ion Project which will redevelop the east one-third
of the Subsector. Housing redevelopment should take place in
the areas between Fischer and Cadillac and between St. Jean
and Montclair which, along with the more sound existing
residential in between, will make for a varied and att+active
housing
area
for
persons
who
might
work
in
the
Jefferson/Conner industrial area. The increase in residents
and workers in the area will help revitalize the commercial
areas along Jefferson and Mack.
POLICY 302-11:

Foch Subsector Policies

Proceed with implementation of plans to develop a major new
automotive assembly plant in the area generally bounded by
Mack, Conner, Jefferson, and St. Jean.
Establish St. Jean,
Mack, and Conner as ring roads around the project area with
heavy landscaping and earth berming to provide adequate
buffering be t ween industrial and residential uses.
Develop
new commercial and multi-family uses along Jefferson. Upgrade
Mack to thoroughfare residential-commercial.
Encourage commercial stabilization of the commercial area
along Jefferson west of Lemay. Maintain sound commercial uses
and develop density-compatible residential use on Vernor,
Charlevoix, and Kercheval.
Provide additional recreation
facilities. In the area generally bounded by Fischer, East
Jefferson,
Cadillac Boulevard,
and Mack,
pursue major
residential revitalization:
remove blighted structures,
assemble land for redevelopment, rebuild neighborhoods and,
when necessary, relocate families to better housing elsewhere.
Begin the redevelopment at Fischer and proceed eastward.
Provide similar treatment in the area bounded by Montclair,
Mack, St. Jean, and Jeff er son, beginning at St. Jean and
proceeding westward.

3/90

III-32

�INDIAN VILLAGE

__

....._..

axlSTII\DLANauaa

___,..,..z
GC
r·
✓\.:.•.

&lt;II'

••

RL-""' °'"'"'-'Y - . - . . i
RLM- ...,._,. o.-,.ty ~

$'&lt;

RM--... - t y ~
INST- I n a t i - - . i
IND-_,_~

RL

••

RLM\
&amp;
V

\
.,~; •

/-'_ ••.-,

U: IND- u~

'.\\\

.

-;:•~:0-t.

·- v _.-;.~---·._· .._; •••./RM

~.. ._.:..
•....

':

··...--.-•..
••• R
....... L
:,.
RM\ /4 • •.RC
... . ..
. ...., : • •.Ri-r,

... •• RH •·.•••\••·.. ··.••

..

.:\ ' \•·
\

• •••

••.,\

IndlaUU.l

TRC- ThoroUqhfar• Ritaidant.ial-o:-rcUl
MC-""lar-

\ .~s··

RL

Ge -· •~..,.;.\_:' RL
-::

°'"'"'-'Y ~

RH- 8191

SRC-si-:w~~

\("'••••RM

SC-si-,;...iRLC-~-

. .....
.....
..
•\$~ant

•

GC-_,__

CC--em-rci.al

..,•• INST

MUR-..--~
M~ MaJar Park
RC- Recr• at: Jon
POS· ,.....,.,.t Open space

•• •• vtater

..-

\ _•

.... ~

\\

OSI-Open

RC

V-

Space-Innuut i onal

Vi1cant

CEM·a...t.ry

RC

NST

\~"-RH
INST

t_

llncht2000ft,

\.
0

0.0

.2J

.JO
.---,

.71

1.0

,---,

-

EAST SECTOR

INCIAN VILLAGE

aa:N • •AUZIID

RL---ty~
RLM- .....-... ,.,.;.ty ~
RM--.... ,......,,~
RH- 8191 -ty ~
SRC- si-,;...i ~~
INST - Inati-.1-1
IND--.rai~
Ll: IND- u~ l:nOuouul
TAC- Thoroughfare Reaid•ntial-C0111Derchl
MC- ..;er 0,aarca1

SCRLCGC-

si-:w ~
~11.ocLl ~
c.nor.i ~

CC· -a-.rc.al

MUR- ,.._

UN ~ t i . a l

POS- Pen:aanent
OSI .. Open

Open Spa. ea

Space-Inatitutl.onal

V- Vacant
CEM·~

*-

Playfhld

AA

l.Lnonh

•

o.o

Ci

,

Inch ,1ooott.

.25

.so

.75

ru-

,.o

~

EAST SECTOR

Indian Village Subsector ••••.•..•• 302-12

III-32A

-

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

EAST SECTOR

INDIAN VILLAGE SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Indian Village Subsector is an area of two census tracts
in the shape of an upside-down letter "T".
The stem of the
"T" is bounded by Jefferson, Fischer, Mack, and Van Dyke
Avenues. The crossbar of the "T" is the riverfront north to
Jefferson, and f ram the MacArthur Bridge on the west to
Marquette Avenue on the east. The stem of the "T" generally
includes the Indian Village neighborhood and the easterly
portion of th~ neighborhood known as West Village.
The
riverfront portion of the Subsector includes the Brodhead
Naval Armory, Solidarity House (international headquarters of
the United Auto Workers), Berry Subdivision, a sizable
district of apartment houses and apartment hotels, a number
of City parks, and the City Water Treatment Plant.
The
Subsector faces Belle Isle Park, an island in the Detroit
River.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, INDIAN VILLAGE SUBSECTOR

Except for the northwest corner of the Subsector and a few
homes on Fischer, the cycle of abandonment and demolition
prevalent in other parts of the East Sector has bypassed this
Subsector.
In addition to the generally excellent housing
stock, the community has an infrastructure of attractive
commercial and institutional uses along Jefferson, parks, and
churches.
Many of the apartment developments on the River
have private boat landings or riverside lawns.
The mansions
of Indian Village are famous for their gardens. West Village
is a virtual museum of architectural styles.
In separate
actions, West Village, Berry Subdivision, and Indian Village
have been designated as historic districts.
INDIAN VILLAGE SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Indian Village Subsector should remain an attractive
residential area for the City of Detroit and the entire
metropolitan area. The historic Indian Village, West Village,
and Berry Subdivision areas will be conserved, as well as the
high-rise
apartment
buildings
along
the
riverfront.
Additional high-rise apartment buildings should be developed
on vacant and under-developed parcels which will take
advantage of the view and proximity to the River without
limiting other's enjoyment of the River. Public access should
be provided along the riverfront by such means as parks,
boatwells, and bicycle and pedestrian paths.

3/90

III-33

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

POLICY 302-12:
A.

EAST SECTOR

Indian Village Subs-ector Policies

Indian Village/West Village District
(Area bounded by Mack, Fischer, Van
Jefferson.)

Dyke,

and

E.

Support the maintenance of residences in the historic Indian
Village and West Village districts.
Phase out general
commercial uses on Charlevoix and Kercheval.
Upgrade Mack
frontage. Encourage rehabilitation of buildings on Van Dyke,
Maxwell, Fischer, and Parker.
B.

East Jefferson Apartment District.
(Area bounded by East Grand Boulevard, East Jefferson,
east property line of the Jeffersonian and Riverhouse
Apartments, and the Detroit River harborline.)

This area includes Gabriel Richard Park, the East Jefferson
apartment district, Merner ial and Owen Parks.
Retain and
rehabilitate the existing apartments as needed.
Encourage
development of additional high-rise apartments on vacant
parcels or on parking lots, preserving views of the River by
careful siting of buildings and setbacks from north-south
sight lines.
Reserve land at the Rier 's edge for public
access, wherever possible.
Retain and improve parks, as
needed, and rehabilitate areas nearest the River's edge for
public access, wherever possible. Retain and improve parks,
as needed, and rehabilitate areas nearest the River's edge
with improved seawalls, picnicking, and fishing areas,
improved access and landscaping. Explore methods of expanding
the quantity of boatwells in the area including dredging,
construction beyond the harborline, and/or relocation of the
harbor line.
Provide for improved pedestrian and bicycling
experiences by way of more adequate paths, lane markings,
landscaping and informative signage at entry points near East
Jefferson and provide a park drive treatment along Jefferson.
C.

Berry Historic District and Waterworks Park
(Area bounded by E. Jefferson, Marquette, the Detroit
River harborline, and the east property line of the
Jeffersonian and Ri verhouse Apartments.)
This area
includes Berry Historic District, Gregory's Marina, and
Waterworks Park.

Provide protection for Berry Subdivision as a single-family
area; encourage development of compatible housing on available
parcels, and provide improved landscape treatment of the entry
area along Jefferson. Encourage the development of apartments
3/90

III-34

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

with integral boatwells along the east side of Parkview.
Support the development of a boat-service center along Motor
' Boat Lane with apartments near the River. Protect significant
River views by requiring setbacks from north-south streets.
Dedicate for public use the northwest corner and River's edge
of Waterworks Park. Explore methods of increasing the number
of boatwells in the area, including dredging, construction
beyond the harborline, or even moving the harborline. Provide
access to the public activity node at the south side of
Waterworks Park via Marquette, a collector thoroughfare, with
a park drive treatment. Provide local streets as needed.

3/90

III-35

�JEFFERSON• MACK

-

&lt;:;

...

~

~

GC~ t

\.

RL,,...Donoi.,.~
RLM- ... Dmaity - ~
RM _ _,_,,__,,,~
RH- Bi&lt;II 0mai.,. ~
SRC- si-:,.u ~~
INST - IMtit:ut=&amp;l
IND- - . i Induoui.&amp;l.
IJ:IND-~-

;,;,,,,,·· ----=-············ ..-~-:
-. ~
-:..........

,. -

,.. ..,,,,,,.,,.

~ #
\

·:

••••••

RLM

\

A;,.,;•:.(••

~

.............

·\ •••

••••~

. . . . .• ·

••

·~

·,

• .,.~~• · • •._

•

\

.-~ ; . • ~

TAC- T!\orouqhf•r• Raeideni.ial-Coaaarcial
MC ...., . , . ~
SC-~o..zd.&amp;l
RLC- ~ o..n:w
GC- - . i o..zd.&amp;l

............ '";!~

RLM··

\

GC/V

\. ••

::•.-:. .-~,...,.zGC/V - ......... .
.......•··
:,...•·· ....•~

'\., _

\,
RLMiv _.,··~I~..••••••: ..~•••••
..
~ ~--•··'
.
•~
•.....•••· · •••• •••
•RM
\.
•• .;

...

....•·~---....·····

RH/v..--:;;?•. \ "
GC/V/2

RM/V

....:,...°):\. ~
- ~~-r•J•••• \
..\·

·•

r

CC- """'""'""' ~

_--

MUR-,..-,u..~
POS- h.rm&amp;nent Open Space

&lt;::.

•••• •

IND\\'~,
\ \ ·.
\""·.:,;..........
-:.
·-~~
••-";:
;;.&gt;
GC

'( ::

• ·"

~-

RH/V

OSI- Open

Si,ace- l nstl.t.u tio nal

V- Vacan t
CEM·ee..ery

t

1 lnc:tl '2000ft.

-

0

EAST SECTOR

-

JEFFERSON• MACK

---

- ~ L A N D U ••

RL- ,... Donoi"Y ~
RLM--.. - . , . ~
RM--.... - , , , ~
RH-Bi&lt;l&gt;Dnli"Y~

SRC-~~-o:-cai
INST-tnati=-ai
IND- - . i Iraatti&amp;l
Ll: IND- LL¢&lt; -.crta1
TAC- Thoroughfare Raaidantial-ComNrcial
MC- "'j ar """'9rcal
SC- si-,1a1 ""'-&lt;d.al
RLC- ~~ a,,mm,cw
GC- Gormra.l Q:,marcw
CC--a.-=w
MUR- , . , - , u • ~
POS- Permanent Opan Space
OSI- Open Space,- l nstn ut..1.o nal
V- V acant
CEM · """"=

LT IND

-

AA
lb""".

1 inch 12000ft.

0

o.o

.so
,..--,,

.21

·"

'="'1.0

EAST SECTOR

Jefferson-Mack Subsector ..•......• 302-13

III-35A

-

�THE DETROfT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC.IES

EAST SECTOR

JEFFERSON-MACK SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Jefferson-Mack Subsector is bounded by Mack Avenue on the
north, the Detroit/Grosse Pointe Park City limits on the east,
Jefferson Avenue on the south, ad Conner on the west.
The
Subsector is approximately 720 ~cres in size, of which 120
acres are devoted to industrial and commercial uses and the
remainder to residential.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, JEFFERSON-MACK SUBSECTOR

The residential sections generally have a very high percentage
of vacant land and vacant residential units. On many streets
west of Lakewood the rate of vacant land is 50 percent or
higher.
The remaining residential s~ructures range in
condition from fair to very poor. The blocks east of Lakewood
have less vacant land and residential units than the
residential areas located west of Lakewood.
The housing is
in fair to good condition.
JEFFERSON-MACK SUBSECTOR GOALS

It will the considerable work to return a large portion of
the Jefferson-Mack Subsector to a level that would be
considered viable.
However, with major rehabi 1 i ta tion and
spot clearance efforts in the residential areas, restructuring
of the commercial strips to relate more to the immediate area,
and proper buffering from the industrial areas to the west,
the Subsector can become a pleasant, convenient community to
house,
among others,
persons working
in the adjacent
industrial corridor.
POLICY 302-13:

Jefferson-Mack Subsector Policies

West of Lakewood, provide for major rehabilitation of existing
housing units along with substantial spot clearance of those
units that are beyond economical rehabilitation.
Encourage
rehabilitation and spot clearance of housing east of the alley
west of Lakewood. Institute commercial stabilization project
on Mack.
Develop Kercheval as thoroughfare residentialcommercial.
(Rezone to B2, Local Business and Residential.)
Keep existing sound commercial on Charlevoix and develop
residential
at
compatible
densities
to
surrounding
neighborhoods.
Rezone to R2 (Two-Family Residential).
Provide additional recreation facilities and a neighborhood
recreation center. Buffer M4 (Intensive Industrial) uses from
residential uses with an M2 (Restricted Industrial) zone.
3/90

III-36

�P'
KETTERING

aaN • •.-.uzaa

&amp;XISTINGI LANCI Laa

RL- t.aw ,....,,,, ~
RLM- ......-.,. 01na.,:y ~
RM--,...,01na..,,~
RH-Bi-,,,...,_,:y~
SRC- Spoci.al ~~
INST- 1nn,.=ia,&amp;).
IND- o..ru Induotri.Ll
U: IND- Liqht Induotri.Ll
RLM

\

.. ·' .-:..
,,~

.

.

....
......

GC-:,.,•• •••

••.Re•~~••••• •••••••

....
. .,,.... .·•···..

.. .:-,GC

~

•••
.•

~•"·.::~· ••.••••

~. \RC\

- ✓~

TAC- Tborou9hfare a.aiden~i•l-Ccanerc:Ul
MC- ,.iar "'"'9arci.al
SC-si-:;.t.lO:aoan::ial
RLC-~a-.:w
GC- - . i O:aoan::ial
CC- amoucw
MUR-,.;-iu.o~
POS- Perm.anent Open
RC- Rac:nau.on
V- Vacant
CEM·ea-..-,,

?

*-

Space

Playtield

l,'J

0

o.o

.21

I
.so

1

r==

.71

,..

i=:i____.,c:::::::.r===,

fl'IMe

EAST SECTOR

KETTERING

-N• -AL&amp;ZaD
PPOPOSFCI LANCI U

••

RL-t.aw,...,_,:y~
RLM- ..,,..__,. 01na.,:y ~
RM---ev~
RH-1114b,...,_,,,,~

SRC-si,oci&amp;J.~-a-cial
INST- 1not1=ia&gt;&amp;l
IND- o..ru Induotri.Ll
U: IND- u&lt;1&gt;t Induotri.Ll

TRC-

Thoroughfare Resident.ial-COfflNrcial

MC- ""iar ~

SC- S!&gt;-=i.al a.a-ca1
RLC- ~ ~
GC- - . i ~

cc--amoucw

MUR- Mi-1 u. -.;-ti.o.!.
POS- hlrma.n.ent Open Space
OSI- Open Space-Institutional
V• Vacant
CEM·c...tery

~-

AA

1h'lch•2000ft,

l,'J

0

=

F====1t:===o.O

.21

.JO

.71

1.0

c::::::::.r===,c=::Jr:::::i

EAST SECTOR

Kettering Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302-14

III-36A

I

flllle

�P'

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIOES

EAST SECTOR

KETTERING SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
' The Kettering Subsector is bounded by the Ford Freeway,
McClellan, Mack, and Mt. Elliott.
The area is developed
primarily with one- and two-family homes, general commercial
uses along Gratiot, and industr¥ in the Bellevue industrial
corridor at the western edge of the Subsector.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, KETTERING SUBSECTOR
Housing in the Kettering Subsector has been identified as one
of the major concerns of the residents.
A substantial
majority of this housing was built in the 1900-1920 time
period; as a result, Kettering home owners must deal with the
various maintenance needs of housing 60 or more years old.
Boarded housing units, vacant residential lots, many in need
of a clean-up, are very common in most neighborhoods in the
Kettering Subsector, except for the Van Dyke-Fischer band.
In areas where housing abandonment and then demolition are
most severe, it is not unusual to find blocks where more than
half of the homes have been removed.
In those blocks where a major portion of the housing has been
lost, the residual vacant lots are distributed in a random
pattern among the remaining housing.
Groups of vacant lots
do occur frequently, but some acquisition and demolition
generally would be required to prepare a site large enough to
be attractive to a developer for new development.
KETTERING SUBSECTOR GOALS
Positive aspects of the Kettering Subsector:
the industrial
corridor between Mt.Elliott and the Conrail beltline, and the
attractive residential area between Van Dyke and Fischer may
to some extent be utilized to overcome the problems of aged
housing and numerous vacant lots. The Subsector is envisioned
as having a strengthened and expanded industrial corridor in
its western portion along with residential areas taking
advantage of vacant lots to make for a less dense community
and less intense commercial strips more appropriate to serve
the surrounding areas.
POLICY 302-14:

Kettering Subsector Policies

Assist in adaptive revitalization of the Packard headquarters
and the Essex Wire Company plant buildings.
Redirect land
uses from residential to industrial in the area between East
3/90

III-37

�r

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

Grand Boulevard and the Ford Freeway, and also between the
, Conrail beltline corridor and Mt. Elliott.
Encourage local
commercial-residential uses and regroup existing businesses
into clusters along the Mack commercial strip.
Begin this
redevelopment on the north side of Mack along the first few
blocks west of McClellan, or just east of Van Dyke. Encourage
a commercial structure rehabilitation program, and encourage
thoroughfare residential commercial on East Forest between
McClellan and Van Dyke.
Phase out obsolete commercial uses
on Gratiot to· allow for major redevelopment. Encourage
industrial expansion east of Mt. Elliott between East Grand
Boulevard and Ford Freeway to at least Frontenac. Encourage
industrial expansion between Mt. Elliott and the Conrail
beltline.
Construct a neighborhood recreation center.
Provide recreation programming in non-City owned buildings.
Encourage adjoining homeowners to purchase vacant lots in
order to increase yard space.

3/90

III-38

�BT. JEAN
maN• 91Auzaa
BXIIITING LANO uall

~~
,.,~g

§

..

RL-i-emaitv~

AJ}\··· '-.. :-

·•·•···.
-...:..::..•, ,
- •• -, .....~
~~fff#."~?-~•··· ··.:··~-~··.. INST
;//
G~/ ~CSE '

Fi•? r-·

,...,:.;._~(,(·
---~·:--!'-...•~

. €~ .•··--··········

•d'!•~&gt;

-::

1'i"" #F ·. __
.

·..

RLM/V

\

.

.....-•--•·-•·•-·•••
I
• IND

.. :;.

"

---~·-:
'"···-·······-Gc7 ·······-....:.
GC
RLM/v

..,•••••
••••••• •• ••••• \ •

~-·•••••(I.:..
-···
../',;.',

~~·•iNST,:\Rc\
·•.-··'
.•. . ••-1. .--·.•

RLM- .. -.,, ~
RM---..cy~
RH- &amp; o h - . . . , , ~
SRC- si-:&lt;A1 ~~
INST - Izlatit:uti....i
IND--.-1.1:IND-Uflll:-

TAC• TbOroQCJbhr• Reaidantial-0-U-cial
MC- MJcr o..-rd.&amp;l
SC- si-:&lt;A1 c:-mcw.
RLC- ~ e:a.rr:w

GC-GmcaJ.CC--o:-n:w
MUR-111-'u.~

RC-

-~-·· .--~--

RL~••••::~;
~o•-=..,\ -..(_• GC

Recrau.1cn

OSI-Open
V•

Space-lnatitutional

Vacant

CEM-~

*-

RLM

Playfield

t_

I inch '200011 .

-

0

0.0

.25

.JO

.71

r--,

1.0

~

EAST SECTOR

l

BT. JEAN
G• N • .. AUDD

PADPnPPII LAN0U-

RL- i- emaitv

~

RLM--...--..,,~
RM--... - - . " " ~
RH-.,_..,_.,,~
SRC- si-:&lt;A1 ~ - o : - r o , . , , J ,
I NST - InaU--.i.
IND--.iL'IIND-Uflll:-.=-i

TAC- Thoroughfare Reaidantial-CoaNrcial
MC-i.1cro:-n:w
SC- si-:&lt;A1 C&gt;mmd£l
RLC- ~ -

GC- Gmor&amp;l CC--Cl:lmmti.a.l
MUR- 111-' - ~
POS- Permanent Open Space
OSI- Open Space-'InatJ.tutional
V•

Vacant

CEM-~

*-

Playfield

0,0

.2J

.JO

=

.7S

1,0

c:::::::::Jr - - ,c.___,

EAST SECTOR

St. Jean Subsector .•...•........... 302-15

III-38A

-

�r

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC,..IES

EAST SECTOR

ST. JEAN SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The St. Jean Subsector is bounded by the Edsel Ford Freeway
(I-94) to the north, Conner on the east, Mack on the south,
and McClellan to the west.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, ST. JEAN SUBSECTOR

The vast majority of housing in the St. Jean Subsector is
either single-family detached or two-family flats.
While
apartment buildings are scattered throughout the Subsector,
there is no concentration of multiple-dwelling units.
Housing in the St. Jean Subsector is in fair to poor
condition.
There are many vacant structures (some are
boarded, and some are open and dangerous), burned-out
structures, many vacant lots, and many structures with
substantial structural defects, which leaves many of them
beyond feasible rehabilitation.
Residents
of
the
St.
Jean
Subsector
have
identified
maintenance and rehabilitation of housing in the area as one
of their top priorities.
ST. JEAN SUBSECTOR GOALS

In the future, the St. Jean Subsector should contain a
strengthened industrial district in its southeast area which
will
take
advantage
of
the
nearby
Airport-related
developments, and the Chrysler Plant industrial corridor.
The Warren-Conner shopping district and the institutions on
Conner will also act as employment bases for the Sector's
residents as well as serving the needs of the larger East
Sector community.
There should be a blend of existing and redeveloped housing
in the Subsector which will be adequately buffered from the
industrial district and serve as a viable community to house,
among others, workers in the Subsector's employment centers.
POLICY 302-15:

St. Jean Subsector Policies.

Develop residential uses, compatible with the neighborhood,
on the vacant parts of Shoemaker and East Forest.
Consider
replatting in the Shoemaker area to reduce irregularity of
lots.
In the area east of St. Jean south of Warren, remove
abandoned structures as soon as possible and maintain vacant
3/90

III-39

�r

.THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST SECTOR

land - in interim uses.
Encourage residents in this area to
relocate to better housing elsewhere in the Sector. This area
' should be promoted for industrial development, providing a
buffering strip of light industrial-uses east of St. Jean
developed to protect the residential areas to the west.
Encourage thoroughfare residential-commercial on East Warren
and Mack.
Upgrade the landscaping and encourage self-help
clean-up of the Warren/Conner shopping center.

r

3/90

III-40

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

ARTICLE 303

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR LOCATION AND EXTENT
The East Central Sector is a narrow strip -0f the City, roughly
three-quarters of a mile wide and four miles long, running
from the southern boundary of Hamtramck south to the Detroit
River. It is bounded on the west by the Chrysler Freeway and
the Woodward Corridor, and on the east by Mt. Elliott and the
East Sector.
The Sector is divided into four subsectors:
Upper East
Central, Middle East Central, Lower East Central, and Near
East Riverfront.

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS
The East Central Sector is a diverse area containing, at the
north end, the massive Central Industrial Park which includes
the General Motors Assembly Plant and, at the south end, the
Lafayette/Elmwood urban renewal area, Harbortown residential
development and River Place off ice park.
It also contains
other major industrial facilities, including the GM-Saginaw
Division Plant and Chevrolet Forge, as well as the Eastern
Market, the Forest Park urban renewal project, the McDougallHunt project area, and other industrial, cornmerc ial, and
residential uses.
The
policies
which
follow
make
the
assumption
that
considerable development pressures will occur within the nearto mid-range future in the area along the riverfront.
In the
area north of Gratiot and south of Ford Freeway, except for
projects already planned, development will be some years away.
In the longer run,
this area will also be ripe for
development.
The major planning objectives are to increase employment
opportunities for residents; continue to seek other industrial
firms to locate in the Central Industrial project, especially
suppliers to the General Motors plant; address the vacant land
problem; address the problem of the incompatible mix of
residential and industrial land uses; provide for the orderly
expansion of the Eastern Market area; preserve sound older
3/90

III-41

�.

SECTOR

•

MIDDLE
East Central

LOWER
East Central

_,;:.,...~,__..,.!
~

.l

,,.-&gt;'t

NEAR
East Riverfront

Lower East Central Subsector . . . . . . . 303-10
Middle East Central Subsector .... 303-9
Near East Riverfront Subsector .... 303-11
Upper East Central Subsector . . . . . . . 303-8

�.
GENERALIZED

REZONING CONCEPT

U

S/NGLE·F All/LY RESIDElfflt,L
TWO-FAll/LY RESIDElffll&gt;l
LON·DENSfTY RESIDElff/4
THOROOGHFAAE REStDElffll&gt;l
UEDIUU-DENSfTY RES/0£/ffl/&gt;l
HIGH-DENSfTY RES!DElffll&gt;l

81
B2

LOC4 BUSINESSI RESIDE/fft,4L

11
12

13
M
RS

83
84
86

RESTRICTED BUSINESS
SHOPPING DISTRICT
GENERl&gt;l BUSINESS
GENERl&gt;l SER,1/CES

UllfTED INOJSTRll&gt;l
RESTRICTED INOJSTRl/&gt;l
GENERl&gt;l INOJSTRl/&gt;l
M4 llffENSNE INOJSTR/4
M5 SPEC/4 INOJSTRll&gt;l

Ml
M2
M3

SPECl/&gt;l DEYELOPUElff
!resldettlal,w/lh /Im/led corrrnerc/a/J
SD2 SPEC/4 DEYELDPUElff
!convnerclat.wlth llmited resldmla/J
S04 PROPOSED SPEC/4 DEVELDPUElff
RNERFRO/ff 11/X USE
SDI

PD
PC
l'CA
TM
WI

PUNNED DEYELDPME/ff
PUBUC CENTER
RESTRICTED CE/ffR,4L BUSINESS
TRMSfTIONAL /NOJSTRl/&gt;l
WATERFRO/ff INOOSTRll&gt;l

PR

PAAKS arr/ RECREATION

.:l

PUBUC WHAAF

EAST CENTRAL
SECTOR

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

housing; and maximize the riverfront potential as a source of
employment, a high density, mixed income, residential area,
' and an esthetically pleasing, safe, publicly accessible area
for recreational purposes.
POLICY 303-1: East Central Sector - Land Use
Expand all functions of the Eastern Market. Control abrasive
uses
and
encourage
residential
development
on
excess
commercial land. Encourage renovation and reuse of vacant and
under-utilized buildings such as warehouses and factories.
Recognize and enhance the special districts including Elmwood,
Forest Park, Eastern Market, Chene-Ferry, and the Riverfront.
Respect the identity of special areas while lessening their
isolation from the surrounding neighborhoods.

POLICY 303-2:

East Central Sector - Residential Development

Encourage and assist housing conservation and rehabilitation.
Increase the supply of good quality housing, especially in the
riverfront area.

POLICY 303-3:

East Central Sector - Commercial Development

Promote establishment of new business and ins ti tut ions in
suitable sections of the area.
Support programs which can
make Eastern Market and Chene/Ferry more efficient and modern.
Improve both the appearance and the function of the commercial
areas.

POLICY 303-4:

East Central Sector - Industrial Development

Make as efficient as possible the industrial core in the Upper
East Central Subsector.
Take advantage of positive impacts
of the General Motors Plant upon the City and the immediately
surrounding area, while alleviating any adverse impacts on
surrounding residential communities. Provide land for small
industrial facilities near Central Industrial Park. Encourage
expansion and modernization of existing industrial uses near
the GM plant.
Continue to support the development of
Milwaukee Junction.

POLICY 303-5:

East Central Sector - Transportation System

Improve vehicular and pedestrian linkages between East
Jefferson and Lafayette Park, the Riverfront district, the
future Linked Riverfront Parks and the Detroit River. Improve
transportation access and traffic circulation for all modes
of
transportation
in
the
East
Central
Sector,
while
3/90

III-42

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI.CIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

alleviating any adverse impacts upon surrounding communities.
Develop a system for pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Take
advantage of development opportunities which may result from
transportation improvements. Develop and improve roadways to
and along the riverfront.
Improve rail service and truck
routes north of Gratiot
in_ the Eastern Market area.
Consolidate railroad freight lines and remove abandoned rail
tracks in the riverfront area between St. Aubin and East Grand
Boulevard. Eliminate rail tracks where not needed.
Provide
vehicular circulation links between Milwaukee Junction and
Eastern Market.
POLICY 303-6:

East Central Recreation System

Develop playfield space north of Gratiot and east of
St. Aubin.
Provide active recreation land in urban renewal
areas and other areas where land use changes are occurring~
Increase ~enior citizen recreation programs, especially north
of Gratiot.
Build vest-pocket parks in new developments.
Continue to implement the linked riverfront parks proposal.
Reserve the River's edge for River-oriented use, especially
those which derive special benefits from such a location, such
as recreational boating or natural views and setting. Expand
leisure time opportunities, especially those which are Riverrelated.
POLICY 303-7:

East Central Urban Design

Recognize and protect distinctive urban spaces and vistas.
Improve
the visual and perceptual environment of
the
riverfront area. Establish a sense of progression and visual
gateways leading into the CBD on Jefferson and Gratiot.
Improve the visual entry into the riverfront area.
In the
riverfront area,
improve curbs,
lighting,
streets and
sidewalks in poor condition, except where clearance and
development of building(s) is imminent.

3/90

III-43

�•
• Xl • TING

LAND

U

••

RL - Low Dens i ty Residential
RLM - Low-Medium Density
Residential
IND - Industry
LT. IND . - Light Industry
INST - Institutional
VAC - Vacant

··.·.·.

.·.·.· :;i~\\\::'.;:/\\\:::::-:-:.:
~For further explanation of
these Land Use Categories
refer to the Appendix of
this report.

"2':~---~

q

:E
IND
IN0U8TRV

-·- ·•-'"Wy

z:

W
~I'I

ul

l.
0
0 .0

.25

.50

.75

1.0

m,le

~c::::::J
k,toffleter

UPPER EAST CENTRAL

R

• C0MM • Naaa

FUTURE

LAND

us•

RLM

Low-Medium Density
Residential
IND - Industry
LT. IND - Light Industry
INST - Institutional

&gt;-

s

~For further explanation of
t hese Land Use Categories
refer to the Appendi x of
this report.

iI

u.

II
II

IND
INDU

• TRV

..... -........y

/ E GRANO

BL.VO .

0

o.o

=

UPPER

Upper East Central Subsector .•..•.. 303-8

.25

50

75

--

r==l

1.0

m 11e

,------,

ll1 !0Meter

EAST CENTRAL

III-43A

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLU:IES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

UPPER EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The
Upper
East
Central
Subsector
forms
a
U-shaped
configuration that wraps around the southern end of the City
of Hamtramck. From east to west, the Subsector extends from
Mt. Elliott to the Chrysler Freeway and to the south it is
bounded by the Ford Freeway-Grand Trunk Railroad and East
Warren; the Detroit/Hamtramck boundary is the northern border;
almost half of the area of the Upper East Central Subsector
is included in the Central Industrial Park.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, UPPER EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR

A means of raising the level of employment opportunities for
persons with low- and moderate-level skills needs to be found.
Traffic circulation needs to be studied around the Central
Industrial Park project and in and out of Hamtramck as it
relates to both the Chevrolet and the General Motors complexes
and the impact of the changes on the adjacent neighborhoods.
UPPER EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Upper East Central Subsector is envisioned as a thriving
industrial district centered around the General Motors
Assembly Plant, but also containing the Resource Rec·o very
Plant and other existing, expanded, and relocated industries
of a diversified nature. The industrial areas will be wellbuffered from, and will generate minimal traffic through,
nearby
residential
areas.
There
will
be
efficient
transportation
routes
between
industrial
centers
and
convenient public transportation available for workers within
the area.
POLICY 303-8:

Upper East Central Subsector Policies

Continue to support the development of the Central Industrial
Park Project by fulfilling the City's agreements and by
providing adequate City services.
Continue to support the
Resource Recovery Plant.
Improve the conditions for other
industry in the area by providing land for small industrial
operations which may move into the area as a result of the new
General Motors facility, and by providing opportunities for
expansion and modernization of industrial operations which
already exist in the East Central Sector.
Provide for
improvements to traffic circulation, particularly near Chene.
Improve public transit stops for workers going to the new
General Motors plant.
Improve trafficway conditions between
related industrial plants, both nearby and in the region.
3/90

III-44

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

Pr-0vide buffer areas of light industry or open space between
industry and residential communities in order to alleviate any
adverse impacts. Restrict heavy volumes of traffic that may
pass from industrial areas and through adjacent residential
areas.
Except for the residences at the northeast of the General
Motors plant, consider eventually removing the remaining
residences wherever feasible and consolidate the land into
industrial parcels.
Identify possible industrial expansion areas accessible to
rail, and encourage industries dependent upon rail lines to
relocate in identified areas.
Work closely with present
freight lines to insure, or obtain the industrial mass to
support, continued rail service, and encourage excellent
maintenance of rail facilities.
Promote development and prepare sites for new development by
identifying potential development parcels, assembling into
larger parcels, removing obsolete structures, and promoting
appropriate uses. Encourage owners, especially the railroads,
to lease or sell any land not fully utilized.
Where new industry is being encouraged, seek diversification
of Detroit's economic base wherever possible.
Continue to support the development of Milwaukee Junction.
Where land is available, support expansion and new development
of food-processing industry along with other industry in the
Milwaukee Junction development area.
Provide adequate
vehicular circulation links between Milwaukee Junction and
Eastern Market, while alleviating any traffic impacts upon the
Forest Park residential development located between the two
areas.
Provide buffering of adjacent residential by 1 ight
industrial zoning and greenbelts.

3/90

III-45

�EXISTING LAND USE

¼/; ~o.:;~
'-'

.!i

'

:

:·
:

:··-

J._

FWY.

.am;:,
....

~

·'VAC

INST

E. GAANC

,:

:

:' .:GC:.
·~!============c:
i:--·-r:
AM
:ALMSi:

~: !d

INC

GC

11

,C I •

::

1: :

-~---f-.:.· ·

E . WAAAEN

RM - Medium Density
Residential
RLM Low-Medium Density
Res i den ti a 1
GC General Co111Tiercial
IND - Industry
LT. IND - Li ght Industry
INST - Institutional
VAC - •:acant
°For further explanation of these
Land Use Categories, refer to
the Appendix of this report.

'!'l"'--,;.l._i:,..lllisit·._F,.o_,A.,;;;;E;;;s;.;T_"""'l~,;:.;;..-

1

NsT•....:;=:¼='--+-

U
!i

vAca:~---.llil
~! ~.
1 §!!

•
ALM.

:

--"!!.~-=

,1~c

:•_;r'INST

~ n AM
~..

~

.

•••?

2 · ·;.,-••::,,-...
...,-&lt;'o"

Ge

:

.I;"

:

~.......

I

• ·'.~·.:•-·--•• ~ •
_....,.,
·"

I :• ,"'.I

T

~

••:;.•

• • .,

r,: ACK

:

VAC

VAC:
INST---.:.··~ :

:-•:_:':JY,

AM

1
1

~ "' ii
l,!.V___......
;

~::~~~L~~:~

INST

1Nb ~······~r:.-··· ~~
m••-- p•~k,,.. •• • V

.J !,,

:, t ~·1/
..J i

0

jI

,t-f---9~

~,

•~.

'ii

l inch I 2000tt .

Kfel

0 .0

=

.25

.50

,----

t .O

.75

mile

MIDDLE EAST CENTRAL

RECOMMENCED

FUTURE LANO USE

~~

- Medi~~ Density
?.es1::!e:-i t..:..a l

G~ - Gentl:al Ce, .. ,,uel c.i d~

DIST. I~O. - Distribution InCustry
ISD - Industrv
LT. I~O - Light rr\dustry

INST - Inst1.tut.1onal
RLC - Residential/Local

Coi::mercial
SRC - Special Residential /
Cc:nmerc1.al

INC

INST

&gt;- i,;.--;

t

GC
•••••

t

:•LT ,:
:-:-INC::

j:

:

S~
- : rt~ ··-:
.t
- ;".;:
r--,
-==~ _.l'......: liT 'I
~ lf1NST
"t ..ILl
:;: ;•,:i i 'F-: :rf, ;:,!
-··
-

_J'

~

•

,

:=

r---y

~~c

:- ~:

! INST [

}

~

2 ,

-

~

:·•

~

~ · ma•C p•c: +~ '"'9 ••••

I ~,
l:

IST

INC

!L I
I

- •• •·

:,--'•

•

)=~···

INST

r:iACK

INST ,~....__l •••~.......-..-'..

La nd Use catec:;ories, r efer to tl':.e

A~pend ix of this re?ort..

;GCiV

AM

1

For furt.!':.er explanation of t~ese

•.~.ILTIN •
t--.!::,
t !1INST

-,:

....

:.. ,i-:

: ; ii....,.,»-

,,;
JH
w:;

:
~ .... :U.FOAEST

!:

'

.,_...,.._

AM

NST:

_.,••=•

••

••==~·

~=~

••; / ~ s A c

••••=••\"&gt;'-&lt;.'0
••
&lt;:l'

~

w
I

1 , net,: 2000ft.

I

---.:=-noflh

I

..c,cs

=

,

,;,

a

0 .0

.25

,50

r==
.75

1.0

m,1e

MICDLE EAST CENTRAL

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

MIDDLE EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
The Middle East Central
the Ford Freeway, on the
by Mt. Elliott, and on
Chrysler Freeway to East
to the Ford Freeway.

Subsector is bounded on the north by
south by Gratiot Avenue, on the east
the west by a line drawn along the
Warrenr east to St. Aubin, and north

SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, MIDDLE EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR
Considerable mixing of industrial and residential uses and
resulting incompatible uses; employment opportunity expansion;
orderly expansion of Eastern Market and abatement of any major
noise-producing activities vis-a-vis the adjacent residential
area are the major planning issues facing this area.
Organizing a community-wide approach to common problems, such
as lack of alley and vacant lot maintenance, appears to be
difficult
for many parts of
this subsector.
Better
organization of community self-help might alleviate these
problems.
MIDDLE EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR GOALS
The Middle East Central Subsector should continue to be one
of the most active and diversified development areas in the
City featuring a revitalized ad expanded Eastern Market and
a new Brewery Park office complex. The Forest Park area will
contain recently built and additional new housing with
appropriate recreation facilities provided along with new
light industrial uses.
The area east of St. Aubin will
benefit from the surrounding activity and community self-help
effort
to
become
a
well-maintained
and
strengthened
residential area.
This residential area, along with public
improvements and support, will result in a rejuvenated Chene
commercial strip.
POLICY 303-9:

Middle East Central Subsector Policies

Encourage better organization of community self-help efforts,
particularly in the area generally bounded by I-94,
Mt. Elliott, St. Aubin, and Gratiot.
Implement plans to restore and improve the Chene commercial
strip and the Chene-Ferry Market.
Improve recreational
facilities.
Provide better buffers against nearby noxious
land uses. Acquire and demolish vacant buildings on the north
side of Gratiot commercial strip, between Mt. Elliott and
Chene, possibly creating more parking space.
On the south
3/90

III-46

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

side, treat as part of the McDougall-Hunt project; this may
entail rehabilitation and some clearance.
Complete the expansion plans for Eastern Market and retain it
as the primary focus of a regional food wholesaling district
and farmers market activity; encourage more efficient handling
of goods; improve orientation devices, traffic control, and
truck parking and loading.
Maintain rail service to the Eastern Market area, and provide
for grade separation of all tracks at Mack.
Promote the 20-acre site between Russell and the Chrysler
Freeway for development related to the Eastern Market.
Complete the development of the Brewery Park office complex.
Implement the Forest Park Development Plan which includes the
continuation of new housing development between Forest,
Russell, Mack, and the Chrysler Freeway, and the development
of light industrial, institutional, and recreational uses east
of Russell, between Mack and Warren.

3/ 90

III-47

�• Xl• TINO

A

ID

• NTIAL.

. /:;;-. ,.............h\\
r

·1· ~

;:,i)

::

~

:f'
,-::

•··

;:;..... -.,
21:

INST

lz

!I

C:

\)

I~

: -• RLM
IDaNTIA1/;/
/

r· .,i....1
ci

••

•For further explanation of
these Land Use Categories
refer to the Appendix of
this report.

........ -ii

•••

U

RLM - Low-Medi um Density
Res i denti a 1
GC - General Corrmercial
SC - Speci al Corrmercial
IND · Industry
LT. IND - Light Industry
INST - Institutional
REC - Recreation
VAC - Vacant

RLM

••

LAND

I

(It

"'

INST

INBT

GIC

VAC

LT. IND

VAC
NBT

, ,nc,, : 2000ft

oc

.-cre1

0

o.o

.25

50

75

10

11

'" •

==-:J==l_~=
k i lometer

LOWER EAST CENTRAL

• • caMM• Naaa
FUTURE LAND UBE

RLM - Low-Medium Density
Res i den ti a1
SRC - Special Residential
Convnerci a 1
GC - Genera 1 Corrmerci a 1
SC - Special Corrmercial

BR

R ••

LT. IND• Light Industry
INST - Institutional
REC - Recreational

RLM

ID • NTIAL

LC

VERNOR

-~-~."!"..... ~

Ial~
:i
41

RLM

••

•

/

~I

I

1D NTI

oc
•
, ••• 1
:
&amp;T:
.L.AAN~
•

BC

LC

Local Commercial/Residential

•for further explanation of these
Land Use Categor.ies refer to
the Appendix of this report.

LC

LT. IND
REC

.l

SC

INST

0

o.o

.25

.so

,.o ,.....

.......
.75

c:::::f===i~,
LOWER

Lower East Central Subsector •••••.• 303-10

EAST CENTRAL

III-47A
-~-

- - --

-

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

LOWER EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
The Lower East Central Subsector is bounded on the north by
Gratiot, on the west by the Chrysler Freeway, on the south by
Larned, East Grand Boulevard and Lafayette, and on the east
by Mt. Elliott.

SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, LOWER EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR
Maintenance of consistency in development of remaining lots
in the Lafayette/Elmwood area; reduction of remaining security
problems; completion of work to assure full visual access to
riverfront at Chene and Mt. Elliott entrances; and effective
preservation of vintage housing in McDougall-Hunt are the
issues for the area.

LOWER EAST CENTRAL SUBSECTOR GOALS
The redevelopment areas within the Lower East Central
Subsector will be completed and will continue to be regionally
attractive areas of newer housing of various types for persons
of a wide range of incomes.
The older housing area in the
subsector will be maintained with the help of public
improvements and programs, and will be strengthened by the
surrounding development. The commercial strips on Gratiot and
Mt. Elliott will be beautified and redeveloped, where needed,
and act as gateways to the Central Business District and the
riverfront, respectively, as well as serve the surrounding
areas.

POLICY 303-10:

Lower East Central Subsector Policies

Complete the development of new
parcels in the Elmwood Park area.

housing

in

the

remaining

Continue to work carefully with the Citizens District
Councils, and make such improvements as are possible.
As
development is completed on Chene, the section along Vernor
should be improved.
The design unity of Gratiot should be improved, and special
treatment should be given to the ares where Gratiot serves as
an entrance to the Central Business District.
Redevelop the Gratiot and Mt. Elliott commercial frontages.
Along Gratiot, between St. Aubin and Mt. Elliott, and along
Mt.
Elliott
between
Gratiot
and
Vernor,
encourage
rehabilitation and maintenance of viable structures; eliminate
unsound buildings and encourage new commercial development.
III-48

3/90

-

----

- - --

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIJ;:IES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

• In the portion of McDougall-Hunt bounded by Chene, Vernor,
Mt. Elliott, and Gratiot, repair public infrastructure,
rehabilitate structures, and relocate families in nonviable
housing to sound dwellings within the project.
Remove all structures in the area bounded by the alley east
of St. Aubin, Chene, Gratiot, and Vernor, and provide for
medium-density residential redevelopment.

'

3/90

III-49

�0

0:

;
0

sr

0
0

~

FISHEA

"

i 1111

FWV

;;:

0
0:

:,:

u

•

...3'

~1!

.~H

G/1

DETROIT
Near East Riverfront
EXISTING

LAND UBE

SRC - Special Residential Conmercial
IND - Industrial

t

2000ft,

lflCft I

INST- Institutional

1,.

0

1,2

.....

VAC - Vacant
REC - Recreation

o.o

,---, =

.25

.50

.75

.
ci
~

RIVER

Near East Riverfront
RECOMMENOEO

FUTURE

LANO USE

RH
High Density Residential
LI
Light Industrial
PT
Port Terminal
SC
Special Co1TU11ercial
SRC -- Special Residential-Co1TU11ercial
MP -- Major Park
INST -- Institutional
C -- conunercial
Map revised 7-88 accordi~g
Public Wharf
to Near East Riverfront
Plan, adopted B-87

&amp; --

Near East Riverfront Subsector ..•• 303-11

1 Inch • 2000 ft .

1,.

0

0.0

1,2

.....

.50
.75
1.0
,.....-----,~

.25

III-49A

1.0

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

NEAR EAST RIVERFRONT SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
' The Near East Riverfront boundaries are defined on the west
by Bates (extended) to the River and the Belle Isle (McArthur)
Bridge to the east, by East Jefferson and the Detroit River
on the north and south.
This area is comprised of
approximately 320 acres. The area also includes an adjacent
80-acre area bounded by Mt. Elliott, East Lafayette, East
Grand Boulevard, and East Jefferson. Additionally, the area
includes the n.o rth side of East Jeff er son bounded by East
Larned, Mt. Elliott, East Jefferson, and the Chrysler service
drive.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, NEAR EAST RIVERFRONT SUBSECTOR
The Near East Riverfront Subsector is one of several areas of
the City of Detroit experiencing considerable private sector
redevelopment
pressure.
Having
a
detailed
plan
of
redevelopment is in the best interests of both the City and
the private sector.
The nature of the Near East Riverfront
redevelopment can be characterized as change
from an
underutilized industrial and warehousing district to a
residential,
recreational, and office development area.
Higher intensity of use means that traffic circulation and
parking are a major concern.
Compatibility between present
active industrial facilities and new housing and recreational
facilities
requires
planning
attention.
Also,
the
desirability of public access to and along the River must be
balanced against the need for residential privacy.
Finally,
the reuse potential of existing structures must be considered
if the design character of the area is to be maintained.
NEAR EAST RIVERFRONT SUBSECTOR GOALS
The Near East Riverfront is the portion of Detroit's
riverfront likely to undergo the most dramatic change in the
near future from an industrial and former warehousing area to
an area emphasizing mixed-use, some housing, recreation, and
light commercial.
Its proximity to the Central Business
District makes it a logical location for functions serving
tourists and conventions as well as other visitors from
outside Detroit.
It is also an area where the general trend
toward downtown and near downtown housing can be furthered.
The basic intent of these Master Plan policies is to show, in
ample detail, a clear direction of change of land use in the
Near East Riverfront area from industrial to non-industrial
uses.
3/90

III-50

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI,CIES

POLICY 303-11:
A.

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

Near East Riverfront Subsector Policies

TRAFFICWAYS

E. Jefferson serves and will continue to function as the major
east-west thoroughfare.
Seccndary thoroughfares,
which
provide more than local property service, are proposed to
include:
Rivard, Orleans, Chene, Jos. Campau, Mt. Elliott,
East Grand Boulevard, and Atwater (between St. Antoine and
Orleans).
Franklin is proposed as a continuous collector
street between St. Antoine and Adair. Other streets will
provide local access.
Interim truck routes should be
established to service existing industries and be planned and
designed mainly along north-south corridors in order to
minimize impact on east-west streets, particularly Atwater,
so a not to adversely affect commercial and residential
development sites.
The Conrail (NYCRR) railroad right-of-way north of Jefferson
between Beaufait and Bellevue can be developed to handle
traffic movement into and out of the Uniroyal site.
The
railroad right-of-way area can serve as a peak traffic
thoroughfare that would connect with an improved Vernor Avenue
for westward-bound traffic.
B.

PARKING

Encourage the provision of parking in structures or "podiums"
with air rights development above.
Generally, if parking
structures are considered for construction on parcels fronting
on the River, they should be encouraged to be no more than
two-story parking podiums with intense development above,
south of Atwater.
Up to four-story parking podiums with
intense development above will be encouraged north of Atwater.
Parking podiums are here defined as parking structures, built
to accommodate air-rights
development
for
residential,
office/commercial, or other uses above. Free-standing parking
structures will be discouraged north and south of Atwater.
Where appropriate, retail uses are intended to be built along
the ground floor of major parking podiums.
The function of
the parking deck of podiums adjacent to Renaissance Center is
that of a continuous strip of parking and offices connected
by skywalks which would create an entire, interrelated unit.
Along the second level or skywalk locations, retail activity
may be appropriate in some locations.
The possibility of "shared parking" among developments must
be explored in more detail in order to achieve an overall
3/90

III-51

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

reduction in land area used for parking within the Near East
Riverfront.
C.

TRANSIT

The present railroad (GTWRR) tr.acks along St. Aubin leading
into the East Riverfront area, towards Renaissance Center,
should remain and eventually accommodate a light rail or
subway line. For east-west circulation, a theme shuttle bus
should
provide
service
for
internal
travel
between
developments, along Franklin and Atwater.
A shuttle bus is
flexible and can redirect its route according to changes in
activity in the area.
In the plans that have been developed for the Woodward Avenue
transit system as applied to the East Riverfront, the subway
should be a major added stimulus to development.
Specific
line and station locations in this area have been chosen to
maximize the positive impacts on potential new development.
Subway stations should be located on Jefferson adjacent to the
Renaissance Center and in the vicinity of Franklin and
Orleans.
D.

URBAN DESIGN POLICIES

River Image
The Detroit River should be emphasized as the primary physical
image of the area.
This segment of the riverfront will always present
strong
impact on Detroit's image.
Strong steps must be taken to
assure that the image is most positive.
To this end, a separate and more detailed study of urban
design issues along the Near East Riverfront area should be
encouraged.
Views of the River
Moderate setbacks of about 20 feet from the right-of-way along
north-south streets from Jefferson Avenue, promoting visual
access to the riverfront, should be instituted.
View
corridors, especially from Jefferson Avenue, should be placed
so as not to block any significant views.
The areas where
major north-south streets terminate at or near the River's
edge should be kept open to preserve views of the River.

3/90

III-52

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIClES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

Public Wharves
Public marina/wharves with commercial development and a
nautical theme should be developed in several locations along
the riverfront.
Continuous Riverwalk
A continuous pedestrian/bicycle path should be provided
generally along the riverfront edge and along Atwater, Guoin,
and Wight Streets as indicated on the "Trafficways Plan" map.
This path should generally have a minimum width of 19 feet to
allow for a bicycle path, a pedestrian walk, and adequate
landscaping where feasible.

Skywalks
There should be a -system of skywalks linking Renaissance
Center and the parking podiums of other nearby development
complexes, providing an enclosed environment from office to
automobile, once anyone enters a parking structure connected
with the Center.
Gateway Entries
Entry points at the intersections of Jefferson and the primary
streets which continue south into the Near East Riverfront
area should
receive special design treatment
such as
landscaping, portals, paving materials, banners, lighting
and/or other visual elements to enhance these major points of
entry into the Riverfront area. Landscaping and the special
design treatment should also link gateway entries along the
Jefferson east-west continuum, within the public right-of-way.
Character and Quality
The special character and quality of the riverfront area
should be recognized and encouraged.
Careful consideration
should be given to the texture, color, and form of the
streetscape and buildings. Special lighting should be added
complementing the character of the area, and enhancing
security.
Franklin/Woodbridge
New development should complement and be compatible with the
existing character of the Franklin/Woodbridge Street area
between St. Antoine and Dubois. Careful consideration should
be given to the size, shape, and character of new buildings
3/90

III-53

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC.IES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

in relation to the district.
Franklin Street should be
established as the central east-west spine of pedestrian
activity oriented to shopping and entertainment.
Scale and Pedestrian Circulation
Pedestrian-scaled development should be encouraged throughout.
New
development
should
be
geared
toward
street-level
pedestrian-generating uses as much as possible.
Parking
structures shq·uld contain street-level commercial uses.
Conflict between pedestrian and vehicular traffic should be
minimized as much as possible. Alleys ad small streets should
be designed as integral parts of a pedestrian network.
Distinctive landscaping, attractive street furniture, and a
well-designed signage system should enhance pedestrian
activities.
Historic Character
The historic nature of the district should be emphasized.
Architecturally significant and/or historic buildings should
be adaptively
reused where practical and appropriate.
Historic interpretive trails should be developed.
Public Safety
Public spaces and streets should be designed for maximum
public safety. The design of new development should provide
for natural surveillance ( "eyes on the street"). Adequate and
appropriate lighting should be provided.
Three-Dimensionality
The three-dimensionality of the district should be carefully
considered
in
the
context of
new development.
The
relationships between the parks, streets, buildings, and
circulation patterns should be recognized when planning new
development.
The design of new development should consider
its vertical impact on the skyline.
Changes of level,
separation of grade, especially at the River's edge, should
be encouraged.
E.

INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE

The existing non-River-oriented factories between Rivard and
Jos. Campau should be encouraged to improve their operating
characteristics to achieve lower noise levels, improved
outdoor storage, and reduced air pollution so that development
opportunities are not lost. Whenever industry is relocated,
3/90

III-54

�-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLikIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

every effort should be made to find a suitable relocation in
the City.
Since the cement plants are waterfront-dependent and would be
very costly to move, they are considered fixtures until such
time as their relocation becomes feasible.
F.

PUBLIC ACCESS

Implement existing plan for riverfront parks and bicycle
paths.
The linked parks concept, including a continuous
pedestrian and bicycle path, should continue to be implemented
through careful phasing. Public pedestrian and bicycle access
to the River's edge should be maximized.
When housing,
commercial, or institutional uses are preferable on parcels
along the River, buffers and easements should be provided to
enable public access along the riverfront.
Parks sometimes
can serve the function of buffers.
G.

HOUSING

Insure that variety in housing types · is available in new
development.
In order to encourage housing to be developed,
performance criteria should be formulated and implemented for
each potential housing site to insure that mixed housing types
and mixed family types (as categorized by income, size,
tenure, etc.) are provided, and a "sense of community" is
developed. Some child-oriented housing should be provided in
the eastern end of the Near East Riverfront area, but childoriented housing should be limited in the western half because
of the high land value and the high density of development
being proposed, as well as existing industry and trucking.
Preferably, any new senior housing should be located near
Jefferson, rather than close to the River, to be near needed
services
including
. bus
transportation.
Promote
housing/commercial and institutional along both sides of East
Jefferson.
H.

ADAPTIVE REUSE

Promote adaptive reuses in appropriate areas. Certain areas
have special "character" and need special treatment.
Jos. Campau street frontage should be given conservation type
treatment, discouraging demolition of existing structures and
encouraging rehabilitation and infill construction designed
to complement the area.
Jos. Campau now contains several
pleasant buildings. This character should be maintained and
strengthened. There are some fine, old industrial buildings
along Mt. Elliott at Wight which should be retained and
3/90

III-55

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

adaptively
reused,
if
possible,
with
a
entertainment, housing, retail, and offices.

I.

mixture

of

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Promote employment opportunity as a priority component in both
physical and economic development. Redevelopment of this area
should contain sites for job intensive businesses compatible
with future residential development.
Sites should be made
available for returning a considerable number of new jobs back
into this area, using the River as an amenity to encourage
job-producing development in areas such as business offices,
entertainment,
restaurants,
cultural
facilities,
communications and institutional uses, rather than heavy
industrial or warehousing uses.
POLICY 303-12:

A.

Near East Riverfront Planning Unit Policies

East Grand Boulevard to Mt. Elliott Planning Unit (D-1)
(Jefferson to River)

This area includes the grand entrance to Belle Isle, East
Grand Boulevard, and the prominent landscaped entry park.
Immediately to the west of the entry is the Uniroyal area,
which should be intensely developed with a combination of
offices near Jefferson, apartments near the River, and which
should also include supporting commercial and institutional
use. High tech, research-oriented, or entertainment-oriented
developments, provided they are high intensity, could also be
good uses of the site.
The area to the west, near Mt. Elliott, should be developed
with commercial, residential, or institutional land use.
Adaptive reuse of some of the buildings would be appropriate.
The Mt. Elliott park, including the Coast Guard Museum
building,
should
be
developed
with
a
strong
River
relationship, including a "public wharf" with an integral
commercial node.
The continuous pedestrian/bicycle path
should be developed generally along the River's edge, as shown
on the trafficways plan, continuing to the east.
Provisions
should be made to access the Belle Isle Bridge from the
pedestrian/bicycle path.
B.

Mt. Elliott to Jos. Campau Planning Unit (D-2) (Jefferson
to River)

The predominant strategy throughout this area will be to
promote major change. Development parcels will be assembled,
3/90

III-56

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

largely through private negotiation, and construction of
• housing, office, commercial, and related uses will be
promoted.
Selective adaptive reuse of older industrial
buildings for these new uses will be encouraged. New public
open spaces will be developed as well as pedestrian/bicycle
linkages between the various public open spaces and riverfront
parks, with significant portions of these open spaces being
at the River's edge.
Special planning or urban design
solutions may be sought to achieve compatibility between a
limited number of existing light industries and non-industrial
uses.
If there is a need to relocate viable industry, every
effort will be made to find a suitable relocation site within
the City.
The proposed land use for the area generally bounded by
Jos. Campau, Woodbridge, Walker extended to the River, and the
Detroit River is a mixed land use of Special Commercial
(predominantly commercial).
The proposed land use for the area generally bounded by East
Jefferson, the west property line of the Immigration Service
and Coast Guard, the Detroit River and Walker extended to the
River, is a mixed land use of Special Residential-Commercial
(predominantly residential).
The proposed land use for the
area along Jefferson to Franklin between Jos. Campau and Adair
shall be General Commercial. An institutional area near
Mt. Elliott recognizes the existing Immigration Service and
Coast Guard.
C.

Jos. Campau to Orleans Planning Unit (D-3) (Jefferson to
River)

The Chene Park and St. Aubin Park are now significant features
of this portion of the riverfront.
The area should be
developed to provide live entertainment, transient marinas,
as well as River viewing and fishing.
Use of the expanded
amphitheater within Chene Park can be facilitated by providing
necessary shared parking as part of development proposed
within the area.
Careful buffering, traffic control and
phasing of interim and shared permanent parking will be needed
so that good quality residential living can be achieved.
Adjacent
to
these
parks,
commercial
including
shops,
restaurants, lounges, institutions, and apartments should only
be developed at significant density at the intersection of
Jos. Campau and Atwater, and at the intersection of Orleans
and Atwater.
The entrance at Chene and Jefferson should be
treated as a major entry point to the area. Within the first
block south of Jefferson, Chene should be treated as a
boulevard in order to serve as a transition for Chene Street
3/90

III-57

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

north of Jefferson.
Also, gateway type buildings and
significant landscape features should be built at this
· intersection. Franklin should be retained as a through street
througho~t this area, while Atwater should be treated
primarily for local access and need not be continuous.
Orleans should be treated as a major new access road between
Jefferson
and
Atwater.
Significant
continuous
pedestrian/bicycle access should be provided along Atwater,
making connections to public River access points both to the
east and west . .·
D.

Orleans to St. Antoine Planning Unit (D-4) (Jefferson to
River)

The parcels south of Atwater along the River should be
developed with intense, high density residential and some
commercial. Parking should be in structures and if south of
Atwater should be ~ncouraged to be no more than two stories.
The blocks between Atwater and Franklin should be developed
intensely with commercial uses and parking in mixed-use
structures.
Some apartments are also appropriate. The area
between Franklin and Jefferson should continue with a variety
of small-scale commercial developments . Orleans, Rivard,
St. Antoine, and Atwater should provide major access to
Jefferson and to the development to the west.
A continuous
pedestrian/bicycle path should be provided along the River's
edge and Atwater with significant public access to the River's
edge
at
selected points.
Skywalks
between
adjacent
developments are encouraged with shared parking,
when
appropriate .
E.

Mt. Elliott to East Grand Boulevard Planning Unit (D-5)

(Jefferson to East Lafayette)
The ultimate reuse of the Uniroyal site will, of course,
impact on the area generally bounded by East Jefferson, East
Lafayette, Mt. Elliott, and East Grand Boulevard. Aside from
a few structures of potential architectural or historic merit,
this area should be considered for major redirection if and
when the market exists for development of properties along
Jefferson.
Land should be assembled into larger parcels as
opportunities occur and made available for development. Highintensity commercial/residential development is appropriate
here.
In this area, sites are appropriate near E. Jefferson Avenue
for
high-intensity
office,
commercial,
residential
development.
Further north, housing can be constructed at
moderate densities.
The proposed land use for this area is
3/90

III-58

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES
I~

.

EAST CENTRAL SECTOR

mixed use of Special Residential-Commercial
residential) .
F.

Chrysler Freeway to Mt. Elliott
(Jefferson to East Larned)

(predominantly

Planning

Unit

( D-6)

The area has been proposed for minimal change with an office
development possibly on the northeast corner of Chene and
Jefferson and a small park development, which would tie-in
with the Elmwood/Lafayette parks to the north, located on the
block between St. Aubin and Rivard. East Larned Street would
be improved so that it does not appear as a back door and
enhances the Lafayette/Elmwood area to the north.
Dumpsters
and other outdoor storage areas would be esthetically treated
with landscaping and other design features in order to improve
the appearance of those elements along East Larned. The uses
to be promoted for this area are offices, apartments,
institutions, and ~ther similar general commercial uses.

3/90

III-59

- ----

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

ARTICLE 304
NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR LOCATION AND EXTENT

The Near Northwest Sector represents approximately nine
percent of the City's total land area. In 1980, the Sector's
population (156,198) represented 13 percent of the City's
total population. The Near Northwest Sector is bounded by the
Conrail Railroad on the west and north; the Lodge Freeway on
the east; and the southern boundary is formed by the Ford and
Jeffries Freeways, the Detroit Terminal Railroad, and Tireman
Avenue.
NEAR NORTHWEST PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS

The Near Northwest Sector is a diverse area which contains
some
of
Detroit's
most
well-preserved
and
desirable
neighborhoods. The Sector also contains deteriorating areas,
particularly some commercial strips which often abut sound
residential areas. The housing stock is somewhat older than
the City-wide average, and the median income was only about
80% of the City-wide average as of 1980.
Unemployment is
high, as is the percentage of households deriving income from
public assistance.
The Sector contains two major institutions, Henry Ford
Hospital and the Herman Kiefer complex which houses the City's
Health Department.
Both institutions are located in the
southeastern portion of the Sector.
The Jeffries Freeway, which bisects the Near Northwest Sector,
has disrupted the integrity of many adjacent neighborhoods.
It runs diagonally and parallel to Grand River Avenue
throughout a large portion of the Sector.
This has had a
negative impact on Grand River, a major thoroughfare, in terms
of greatly lessened access, traffic, and activity.
The Near Northwest Sector also has a strong network of
neighborhood
and
community
organizations,
and
many
neighborhoods have a high proportion of people strongly
interested in the welfare of the City as well as the local
3/90

III-60

�•

•

BUBB CTOIIIS

AA

l.1=.....

1 Inch • 5000 tt.

1cr•

c::=

...___

mltft

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5 2.0
c:=:::::,,___r:::::-:,

NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR

Durfee Subsector •.....•...•..•...•. 304-9
Mackenzie Subsector~ ....••.......•. 304-7
Rosa Parks Subsector •.............• 304-10
Russell Woods Subsector .••.•...••. 304-8

�GENERAUZED

REZONING CONCEPT

115
R6

SINGL£-FAIIILY RESIDENTIJL
T«&gt;-FAll/LY RESIDElfTIN..
Lat,-OENSfTY RESIDENTIJL
THOROOGHFNIE RESIDENTIJL
IIEDIUU-DENSfTY RES/DENTIN..
HIGH-DENSfTY RES/r£NTIN..

Bl
82
83
84
86

RESTRICTED 8JSINESS
ILCN.. BiJSINESSIRESlr£KT/)l
Sl;()PPING DISTRICT
GEVERJL 81S!NESS
GDiERJl SEffl/CES

Ml
M2

LJl,IJTED INIJJSTR/)l
RESTRICTED INIJJSTRJJL
GDiERJL INIJJSTRIAL
INTENSNE /NIJJSTRJ)l
SPEC/)l INIJJSTRJJL

111

R2
R3

IU

M3

M4
M5

SDI SPECIAL DEVELOPIIENT
fresldertlal,wlth lfnited rxxmrrciaJ
502 SPECIAL DEVELOPIIENT
(a:mnerda/, with llnited reslderlfcJJ
S04 PROPOSED SPECIJL IDE/.OPJIEJrT
RIVERFRONT 11/X USE
PO
l'C
PCA
TM
WI

-·

--

Pt.MNED DEVELDPIIENT
P!JBUC CENTER
RESTRICTED CENTRJJ. BUSINESS
TP.MSITION.61.. IN/JJSTRl.61..
WATERFRONT /NIJJSTRl.61..

PR

P_!.'?KS and RECREATKJN

4

PUBUC WH/&gt;RF

NEAR
NORTHWEST
SECTOR

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

. community.
One major
Near Northwest Sector
conservation and a
rehabilitation rather

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

concern expressed by residents of the
centered on the need for neighborhood
strong desire to see more building
than demolition.

The primary planning objectives for this Sector are to
conserve existing housing, construct new housing in several
designated areas building upon the strengths of the Sector
(sound housing·, institutions, and community interest), and to
develop strong local shopping and/or residential areas along
commercial strips with general shopping areas being designated
at major intersections.
GENERAL POLICIES
The revitalization of the Near Northwest Sector will focus on
the conservation of existing housing, neighborhoods, and
viable commercial areas.
POLICY 304-1:

Near Northwest Land Use

Enhance existing land use patterns by lending stronger
definition to existing neighborhoods.
Concentrate local
shopping and new residential development along existing
commercial corridors into self-sufficient nodes.
Downzoning
of the north side of Grand River between Livernois and Grand
Boulevard from B4 (General Business) to a more restrictive
classification should be considered .
POLICY 304-2:

Near Northwest Residential Development

In addition to development nodes along commercial corridors
generally, provide for the construction of new housing
adjacent to the following positive development influences:
Oakman Boulevard; Russell Woods Subdivision; Ford Hospital;
Metropolitan Hospital; Research Park; Boston-Edison Historic
District; the Virginia Park Development Project; and, the
Herman-Kiefer Health Complex.
POLICY 304-3:

Near Northwest Commercial Development

Promote the location of new retail uses in existing shopping
areas:
the Virginia Park shopping center; the Grand RiverOakman shopping center; Dexter-Davison; or along the Dexter,
Linwood, West Chicago, Joy, or Livernois commercial frontages.
Develop major commercial centers at:
Rosa Parks at West
Philadelphia; Grand River at West Grand Boulevard; Grand River
3/90

III-61

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

• at Dexter; Dexter at Davison; and Grand River at Oakman.
Develop smaller commercial centers at: West Grand Boulevard
at Linwood; Dexter at Joy Road; Grand River at Joy Road;
Livernois at Grand River; Livernois at Lyndon; Wyoming at
Schoolcraft; Wyoming at . Joy; and, West Chicago at Meyers.
Upgrade the Grand River-Oakman retail center to its former
status, including a-shopping mall on the north side of Grand
River east of Oakman. Encourage the rehabilitation and reuse
of the Riviera ~heater.
POLICY 304-4:

Near Northwest Industrial Development

Utilize whatever governmental programs or joint development
possibilities are available to assist industrial development.
POLICY 304-5:

Near Northwest Transportation System

Develop pedestrian and bicycle routes along Oakman Boulevard
and other scenic thoroughfares.
POLICY 304-6:

Near Northwest Recreation System

Assign the City-owned parking lot on Bishop Playfield to the
Recreation Department for use as part of the recreation
facility. Expand and improve Salsinger Playground. Increase
security and improve senior and handicapped accessibility at
Northwestern Recreation Center.

3/90

III-62

�MACKENZIE

--- ··--I.AND~

RL-io,-oy-...ai

RLM- ,_._ - &lt; Y - . - i
RM--,_ ...... . , - - . , . i
RH---&lt;Y~
SRC-~-.--.i~
INST-i:n.c1--..,.
IND--.i--....i
ll:IND-1.1¢t11daraial
TAC- Tborou.ghfare --•idaftt.ial-Cc:aaerciel
MC- Major -

SC--..io-c.ai

RLC-

~ -.:i..i

GC--.io-c.ai

cc---

RL

MUR----MP- 11aJcr ,.,.
RC- -.-.«1an

POS--c_,.,_
051 • Opan

Spae.-Inat..a.tut::a.on• l

V•

Vacant

CEM- ~

*- Playfield
9-83

AA
lb.....

. IND

;-

r-

;..

!

rr

•12

RL
RL

RL

0.0

RL

.......,t."~:.

~f

tt

LJ
ClJ
.....

1 lncft • 2000 fl .

.

,

r==L=-=-=r===---,
,.

,---, =
.50

U

NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR

ae

:IND

IND
~

RL

/

:_~ IND

MACKENZIE

~, -

,.:.,._~'Y- /

l ntl!'n 1a1e x, •

r----y

IND
:::::!.LT
~
.;..

••a
: INST

l

-----

•--C111:l-11c-•m

u ••

!..AND

RL - io,0mo1oy-

RLM- ~.. - &lt; Y _ , - . . , ,
RM--.. ...... . , - - . . i
RH_.,_,_'Y~
SRC- si-d,111 - ~
INST-,-;.-..-i
IND--.ill: IND- 1.1¢t - - . . . . i
TAC- Tboro.fa.re Alaidantial•CC-.rcia l
MC-Nojor-

SC-._...iRLC-~GC---

cc----

MURMPRC-

~Jo=rGC
AL
AL&lt;;

Open Space

Space-Inatit.!Jtional

CEM-.,.,,._,,

S•

*-

,.!............

---

"LT: AL

iIIN~j

,....-..
t IND !
: L

Recreat i on

OSI - Open

:AL :; f
:
., ~

:

u. -

Ma j or Park

POS- Pezaanent.

r ; :~
•

lli-i

AL

-·~--·······

p

--·i

9·83

LAL:*:
INST

AA
lb .....

INST

1 inch •2000 ft .

-~

LJ
ClJ
acre•

AL

RL

i
0.0

AL

Playfield

AL
R
Ti rl!'man

Mackenzie Subsector ••.•••••.••••••• 304-7

.so
,---,

1.0
,---,

. ,.

NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR
III-62A

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

, MACKENZIE SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
The Mackenzie Subsector is generally bounded by Tireman Avenue
on the south; the Conrail (formerly Penn Central) railroad
tracks on the west and north;- and, the Detroit Terminal
Railroad and Jeffries Freeway (in part) along the east. The
Subsector is named after the high scho~ which serves the
area.
With the exception of the industrial corridors along the rail
lines and the commercial frontage along the major streets, the
entire area is residential. The industrial uses surround the
area on its west, north, and east edges.
Major features and landmarks in Mackenzie include the Grand
River-Oakman shopping center and Oakman Boulevard, which cuts
through the Subsector. The Jeffries Freeway is north of Grand
River and south of the Lyndon Avenue/Conrail industrial
corridor, but pedestrian and vehicular bridges provide for
access and interchange between the areas.

SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, MACKENZIE SUBSECTOR
This Subsector is in relatively fair to good condition but in
need of corrective conservation measures, especially north of
West Chicago, to prevent future problems.
The variety of
housing types reflects the different development periods. The
older housing stock is now approaching 70 years in age and is
most in need of concentrated maintenance.
As in many other areas, there is an excess of land along
thoroughfare frontages zoned for general commercial use which
should modified to reflect existing and desired local
commercial and residential uses, and to provide better
protection of residential areas from abrasive commercial uses.
Viable commercial uses in this area are ones that provide
convenience shopping for adjacent neighborhoods.
These uses
are now scattered and would better serve the area and provide
mutual reinforcement if they could be clustered at strategic
points such as major street intersections. The major shopping
node at Grand River and Oakman needs
revitalization,
particularly by redevelopment of the former Sears' site.
Most smaller industrial operations in the area appear viable
and should continue to provide a long-term employment and tax
base. Many of these are blighting influences on adjacent
3/90

III-63

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

, residential areas, however, and should be better maintained
and buffered from nearby housing. Larger industrial holdings
that are now vacant are blighting influences and should be
actively promoted for reuse.
MACKENZIE SUBSECTOR GOALS
This Subsector is one of the City's older residential areas,
and signs of dge are apparent. There is a need for improved
maintenance and some rehabilitation.
With a good spirit of
cooperative effort and the implementation of these policies,
however, this can become an increasingly desirable residential
community with attractive, convenient shopping areas and
proximity to a wide range of employment opportunities.
Policy 304-7:

Mackenzie Subsector Policies

No major changes in land use are recommended for the Mackenzie
Subsector.
Active conservation of homes, support of local
businesses, and
improvements for certain commercial street
frontages and fringe industrial areas will help insure that
Mackenzie will remain a viable and livable community.
The
basic housing strategy should start with the fact that the
single- and multiple-housing is still predominantly owneroccupied and in generally good condition.
Monitor
existing
multiple
housing
stock
and
provide
appropriate measures to prevent deterioration.
Provide new
multiple housing for adult and senior citizens, especially
along West Chicago and Joy or in other locations close to
shopping, community facilities, and bus routes.
Provide proper protection of residential areas from land use
conflicts by rerouting truck traffic away from residential
streets, providing a higher degree of visual and physical
separation and buffering between residential and abrasive nonresidential uses, controlling or removing nonconforming uses
and concentrating commercial and industrial development on
under-utilized sites, providing the necessary site design
controls to insure adequate on-site parking and landscaping
and/or other buffering from residential areas.
Provide housing conservation programs in older areas where
signs of neglect are appearing.
In those areas where
vacancies indicate a surplus of general commercial land,
provide for less intense business use or thoroughfare-oriented
residential uses.
Seek a developer to build new commercial
of mixed-use facility on the former Sears' site at Grand River
and Oakman.
3/90

III-64

�•

l

•

RUSSELL

waaaa

--

a&gt;c:laTING LAND

uaa

RL-s.-~---.&amp;
ALM· ~ ~., ~
RM- - - - - . e r ~
RH-.,.--.q,........_

SRC--..-INST--..--..
INO---...
U:INO-u.--.
TRC-~,..,.

~1a.1~1

MC---...

sc-- RLC-_,.__
GC-~~

ce---

MUA-..._.u.~
MP..MJU ·-·
RC•lacNHlOII

POS-,._to,,aa...,_
OSl•~n
V•

S~c•·ln • t.Lt\.lt.1.ClfMll

Y.ac&amp;."'lt

CEM---,

*·

Playtield

9/83

AA

LJ

cu

1 IMfl • 2000 ft .

l1=nor1t1
o.o

.st

Id-

, .•

c::=.,r::::::1::::::::r==-,

-

NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR

__

RUSSELL WDDDS

•

.,
__::111011
__,c, P.AND utl

AL-,_..,...,.~
ALM-~.. . . , . . . , . ~
AM--... - . , . -

AH- 111-. ..,...,. - - . . i

SAC- llpocal. ~~
INST--.t&gt;&amp;im&amp;l
lND--.i-.m.ai
ll:IND-u•-.m.ai
MC-11rJcra:-d.al
SC- ._,_.i ALC-~o:-cl.a!
GC--.i"-="l

cc--~

MUA--u..~
MP- JlaJor Park
RC- Jtacreauon
POS- N...,,.,.. _,, · OSI• Open Spac••Innitution•l
V- Vacant
CEM-c....ry

*-

Playtield

9/83

AA

1 lftCfl • 2000 ft.

ll:"ort"

0

o.o

...

,--,

n
cu
..---, .•

.....

NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR

Russell Woods Subsector ••••••••••• 304-8

III-64A

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

, ROSSELL WOODS BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Russell Woods Subsector, primarily a residential area, is
bounded by Dexter Avenue on the east, Joy Road on the south,
the Jeffries Freeway on the west, and the Detroit Terminal
Railroad - now Conrail - on the north.
The area is divided
by Livernois Avenue, a major north/south thoroughfare.
The
small amount of industry in the Subsector is located along the
Detroit Terminal Railroad.
The median household income for the Russell Woods Subsector
is somewhat lower than the Near Northwest Sector median and
considerably lower than the City median.
The housing stock
is aging - nearly two-thirds of it was built during the sixyear period between 1922 and 1927.
The predominant housing
type in this Subsector is the small multiple structure:
two
flats, four flats, and larger apartment buildings. Less than
one-third of the housing is in single-family detached units.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, RUSSELL WOODS SUBSECTOR

The area between Livernois and Dexter, south of Cortland to
Joy Road, is an area that exhibits a generally low level of
maintenance. Vacant structures, abandonment, and subsequent
demolition are the major problems in this area. Some of the
hardest hit blocks in this area are half vacant land, and as
the number and size of vacant lots and the number of vacant
structures increases, property values decrease and the
likelihood of further abandonments increases. There is some
good housing in this area, and there are blocks with virtually
no vacancies, especially in the area near Nardin Park.
Virtually all of the abandonment in this area has occurred in
the last 15 years.
Solutions to the problem will be
particularly difficult in this small area because of the low
income of the residents.
The Russell Woods Subsector has a problem with traffic
congestion on some streets.
Many areas lack off-street
parking. Many streets are narrow and cannot adequately carry
the amount of traffic that flows through the area.
This is
especially true of streets such as Elmhurst, Boston Boulevard,
and West Chicago. Access to Schoolcraft (which terminates at
Ewald Circle) creates heavy traffic on Ewald Circle and Oakman
Boulevard.
Both of these streets are primarily residential
and should not carry high volumes of traffic.
Ewald Circle
is often used as a short-cut to the Jeffries Freeway.
3/90

III-65

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC,_IES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

• Almost all of the major streets in the Russell Woods Subsector
were developed for general commercial uses, with Grand River,
Livernois, and Dexter being the major eommercial strips.
Portions
of
this
commercial
frontage
are
no
longer
commercially viable and vacant buildings and vacant land are
commonplace along some of these streets. It is apparent that
the area no longer supports the amount and type of commercial
activity that it previously supported; this condition is
common in other parts of the City as well.
RUSSELL WOODS SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Russell Woods Subsector has many positive features to
build upon, i.e., the Russell Woods subdivision, the sound
stable community between Livernois and the Jeffries Freeway,
including Oakman Boulevard and Ewald Circle, and certain
potentials for growth and stability along Grand River,
Livernois, and Dexter.
These features should be reinforced
and should be used as anchors in efforts to maintain and
rebuild those portions of the Subsector that need development
or major rehabilitation. The Russell Woods Subsector requires
no major land use changes.
The problems here are difficult in places, but with a
coordinated effort on the part of the City, the community,
and the local businesses, many improvements can be made. The
land that is accruing through the demolition of obsolete
structures offers an opportunity for ultimate redevelopment
into a renewed well-planned residential community.

Policy 304-8:

Russell Woods Subsector Policies

Provide an appropriate array of programs to check abandonment
and to create opportunities for new housing.
In severely
deteriorated areas, consolidate land for
redevelopment,
rehabilitate existing structures, and create development
incentives for the private sector.
Where indicated, redevelop portions of commercial strips to
non-commercial uses. Encourage local commercial, multi-family
residential and institutional uses, rather than general
commercial uses along these strips.
Encourage existing industrial uses along the Detroit Terminal
Railroad to remain and expand, where feasible, within the
existing industrial area. Provide improved buffering between
industry and abutting residential areas north of Ewald Circle.
3/90

III-66

�•
DURFl!E

(

=-r .

_, -= ====--===/

--~ - -

·r

IND ,. .................... - I

F

RLM ,-

IND

,..:.:.. IND

---~D

r

IIX..-nNDL.ANCll.all

RL-io,..,...,,~
RLM--..-.,,~
RM--... - .. ~

•

~~~~:!:::uw•1t~~

RM: ·
.....
:
:
RLM
:
RM
RM ·.
:"
.
:
;RM ,
;
···••·•·.....
-~--····---·····••-'- -- ~ ---~~••!·.;
F

~·.,,r

:

Bi_, ..,...,,

RH~
SRC- ~ - . . . . i . ~
INST - Iz&gt;otJ.~
IND--.i.~
U: IND- Lisl&gt;t lnlUtti&amp;l
TRC- T.baroughfare ,_aidttntial•C~rcial

~~

.

.

• -.;.~ .

t •:••••••••••--•r••:-.-•:••t_•••••••:1N5TIZ : -.
i :
GC : t : GC
.-•••;~s;i 1 _

,.f:!•

J&gt;&lt;
;~
r ::1!

i•:~
! •

RM

:• ·._ :::
: ~~
:•:.:

RLC/GC f

,::· ~
: - ....
•.i: f· .
\ : :·• :---: ; \ ::. ~m t. -

, k:11

:::,:;! ::.

11

,:~

e.. •
;~==::r
: -: :
• ::P. •

RLM

cc-~~

ft :'

: :* :

RM

' :

~
:•]• : N
: II
\

·
,

::Rc:5• /

~
-[ L. . . . . . ..J ~....t.J f
J ,

t :

RH

_ : , _... _ _

1 ~·

: :

• .,

MUR-111-su.-....i.
MP- NaJor Park
RC- Racr•auon
POS- ..,....,.,., Open spa. .

:~ : E -

RLC/GC" : :

;.

SC-,,_;aio..,cw
RLC-~a-rcia!
GC-Gmoralo-cw

t·

_i7.;.·~ -fi:. . . -~f.:.::L.
t :

MC-1101cr c:m-rdal

RLM

-.:.. ~

:-:
.,:

·
.

: -:

'·

LN!

RH \ •

~
•
I RLM :

r

NST

: .~

OSI· Open

*'

Space-Inaututiono1 !

V- Vacant
CEM-~
Playfield

9-83

LJ

·.

• RLC/GC -,

:-c.:-C'i .,M i::r~~::_-_\~

[j_J

I

.. -

..

•-•

,

c_J~,--,

Id-

NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR

I

DURFEE

'---------~-

-N

• •au:zaa
PROPOSEC LAND UBI!!
AL· 1,a, r.m.tr ~
RLM--- ...... , , RM• lalila r:..i~ ~

RH---..,,-

SRC----

INST--1__,

IND---..
Ll:INO-u..,.--...
TAC- "nM,row,J\fare ••l.deAu.a1-c .-.rcul
MC • . . _ _ .

sc---

RLC·_,,,_.QC.-,-=,i

cc---

MUR· , . . - , - MP.. N.a Jor Pa n
RC- Ailc:reui.on
POS0phl s,..
0$ I • Open Spac:e• I nau t. uuona I

,.m&amp;l'lell~

V•

Vacant

CEM·--,,

10/83

~

f.b:.,.~

1 tf1Ctl•1000ft.

LJ

ru

,,,

1

r===L.::::::.::~
0.0

, - ..H
,

. - - -1.0
,

.....

NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR

Durfee Subsector .•.•••••••••.••••.• 304-9

III-66A

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

, DURFEE SOBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
The Durfee Subsector is bounded by the Conrail line, formerly
the Detroit Terminal Railroad, just north of Oakman Boulevard,
the western Highland Park boundary, and the Lodge Freeway,
Clairmount,
Joy Road,
and Dexter.
The Subsector
is
residential.
Major institutional features in the Durfee Subsector include
the Detroi~ Public School campus of Central High, Roosevelt
Elementary, and Durfee Middle School, the Sacred Heart
Seminary on Chicago Boulevard, and Metropolitan Hospital.
An industrial corridor borders the northern edge of the
Subsector and contains several businesses whose products or
services are well-known to Detroit residents, such as the
Hostess Cake Bakery and Focus Hope.
The population demographic characteristics are similar to City
averages and to the neighboring Russell Woods Subsector.
Housing is predominately in small multiples but one-third is
in apartment buildings of 9 or more units. Only about one in
five housing units are single-family.
There was a 19%
decrease in housing stock between 1970 and 1980, mostly in
multi-family dwelling units, and a 29% decrease in population.
Income levels are lower than the City-wide and Sector-wide
medians.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, DURFEE SUBSECTOR
Broken porches are relatively frequent among the brick homes
in the Subsector and these are by far the predominant
structure type.
The need for exterior paint and trim is
evident for many structures throughout the Subsector and
garages are almost universally dilapidated in the Subsector,
except for those located in either the Boston-Edison or Oakman
Boulevard districts.
It is apparent that much of Durfee I s
housing stock is of an age and condition that, although still
better than much of the rest of the City's older stock because
it
is predominantly brick,
is nearing a
point where
significant reinvestment will be necessary to halt decay and
further loss of units.
Many of the apartments in the Subsector, particularly along
Chicago and Woodrow Wilson, are in serious trouble due to a
complex of factors and further demolitions are possible.
Stable apartment housing does exist north of Davison along
Dexter, along sections of LaSalle, and east of Central High

0

3/90

III-67

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

-.NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

• School.
This area also includes a large number of threefamily flats, located along narrow streets; auto parking and
storage is a problem.
Perhaps the poorest housing wit.hin Durfee is the small area
east of the Lodge Freeway east to the Highland Park boundary.
Although there are a few attractive units of frame housing
there, many of the uni ts are barely standard and numerous
units are abandoned.
The industrial area north of Oakman Boulevard should remain
industrial and, with proper buffering, the industrial area
south of Oakman could be expanded, if required.
The industrial area between Linwood and Dexter near Dor is
should remain industrial with possible minor expansion on the
north side of Doris. Buffering along Doris should be improved
to protect the adjoining residential from industrial noise and
traffic.
DURFEE SUBSECTOR GOALS
In this area of predominately multi-family housing units, some
of the problems stem from the relatively low demand for
apartments versus single-family homes. With the trends toward
smaller household sizes, however, and as ultimate resurgence
of the City as a desirable place to live, the resulting market
forces should stimulate a revitalization of this area.
The
following policies are designed to promote and facilitate this
revitalization.
POLICY 304-9:

Durfee Subsector Policies

No major land use changes are recommended for the Durfee
Subsector.
However, a comprehensive housing rehabilitation
and neighborhood reinvestment program is needed in much of the
area, giving particular attention to the unique needs of
senior citizens and female heads of households.
Make every effort to develop a market for apartment housing
in this area and rehabilitate as many existing apartment
buildings as is feasible, especially along Boston, Chicago,
and Rochester between Dexter and Linwood, and provide infill
development in the form of new residential and convenience
shopping uses.
If it is determined that rehabilitation and
repopulation is not feasible, remove the vacant, abandoned
structures as soon as practicable.
3/90

III-68

-I

�THE DETROIT MASTER PIJ\N OF POLICIES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

. In highly dense areas, sell vacant lots to adjoining property
owners for off-street parking or yard space.
Consider
imaginative reuses for larger lots created by apartment
building demolition.
Promote new apartment housing for the
former ~rittendon Hospital site-and the area near the Detroit
Repertory Theater on Woodrow Wilson.
Encourage use of Federal tax credits for rehabilitation of
architecturally significant apartment buildings.
Encourage
facade improvements, better maintenance, removal of abandoned
structures,
and more
residential uses
in the healthy
commercial areas along Rosa Parks and Linwood.
Encourage general commercial uses along Davison and Livernois.
Within the existing industrial area,
support existing
industries and encourage reuse of vacant facilities and more
intensive use of land, buffering adjacent housing areas. Near
the City boundary, coordinate planning with Highland Park.
Find new uses for vacant facilities created by institutional
closings. Provide additional playgrounds and playlots where
demand indicates.

3/90

III-69

�J 0Y

GC
RM
= --,

_,...-.

I

-,
1 :-

q

~

R
M

RM

RM

·"'I·v:Gc
;--

.----.

.·

10/83

MC- 1111cr ~
SC- spoci&amp;l 0:a1mc&amp;1
RLC- ~ 0:Darci&amp;l
GC--.i.~
CC·-a-:d&amp;l
MUR-111..i-~
MP... Najar Park

ROSA PARKS

--

ISXISTINlll&amp;.ANDi.aa

RL - ,-..,..,:y-.;-..i
RLM•--,:y_,-.....,

RC-

1 UICfil :

-

0

._::nat.ion

POS· ,.......,., Open • .,..,.
OSf-apen Spac•- I nsutut.ion&amp; !

RM-_,__.,. ~
RH•--,:y~
SRC- 1poc1&amp;1 - - . . . i ~
INST. i.u-......i

2000ft

0.0

50

V• Vacant

CEM·c:.o.-y

IND•.......ilmUa:!Al

*-

LJ:IND-u.q1,&lt;lDl!uftz1&amp;1

··-

l'fttl,e

NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR

Play1'.ield

JO Y

.
R:
. !RM

Rl.C

I

RM

RM

,----·

RM

:-

RM
0

0
0

RLM

3:

!

d

L.~.~f §

!

E UCLI D

;I

';: &lt;_ Ap::iMO \J NT

M~

RM

RM

1.0

i==r==='~

"'

=
:!

9/83

TRC-

ROSA PARKS

-- u••
•--cw-:11--:1
I.Allm

RL-i.....,..,:y~
RLM- , - , . --,.,,,. ~
RM--.. - " ' ~
RH-81¢..,..,:y~
SRC- - - . i - - . . i ~
INST-1oat.1-1ooa1

IND•-iinoUtti&amp;l
LJ: IND- lJ.qb&lt; - - = . a i

Thorouqhfar• HaddentialC~ r c h .l

MC-1111cr~

SC- si-,iAi"-&lt;:i&amp;.1
RLC-~~

GC--,.~
CC--a-rci.i
MUR---~
MP-

flla j or Park

RC-

Recreation

POS- P e ~ t
OSI- Ope.n

*-

l.
0
0.0

Open Space

50

Space-tnat i tut i ona l

Playf'ield

CEM·c:.o.-y

Rosa Parks Subsector ••.••••.•••••.• 304-10

·-

1.C,

Mt ..

i==r==='c:::..::Jc::=-J
NEAR
NORTHWEST SECTOR

III-69A

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

ROSA PARKS SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
The Rosa Parks Subsector is bounded by the Ford Freeway
(I-94) on the south, the Jeffries Freeway (I-96) on the west,
Clairmount Avenue and Joy Road-on the north, and the Lodge
Freeway ( US-10) on the east.
The area is predominantly
residential, along with schools (such as Northwestern High
School), churches, and commercial facilities serving the
immediate neighborhood. Henry Ford Hospital is a facility of
region-wide importance.
There is also a small industrial
corridor at the Subsector's southeastern corner.
The Rosa Parks Subsector has led redevelopment and rebuilding
in Detroit with hundreds of new housing uni ts occupied in
Research Park, Virginia Park, near Henry Ford Hospital and
along the Grand Boulevard.
Because of these urban renewal areas and the fact that most
of the other housing in this Subsector is the oldest, and
poorest, in the Sector, the Rosa Parks Subsector has three
distinct types of residential areas:
new family housing,
senior housing, and the older housing which existed before
urban renewal and which is typical of older housing in the
other subsectors, i.e., mostly small multiples with some
larger
apartment
buildings
and
single-family
homes.
Population has decreased steadily since 1950 due to urban
renewal as well as general attrition and abandonment.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, ROSA PARKS SUBSECTOR
Much of the area south of West Grand Boulevard is in disrepair
and some of the neighborhoods near Grand River Avenue have
been affected.
Most of the buildings along Heritage Place
( formerly Dumbarton) have been torn down.
Changing market
conditions and increased operating costs have resulted in a
very significant shrinkage of the large multiple-housing
buildings in the Near Northwest Sector.
The families that
once occupied these buildings (small, or lower income Black
households) have settled into flats or taken apartments in the
outer portions of the City.
An aging housing stock and a population affected by continuing
high levels of poverty and unemployment are an inauspicious
mix. Simply stated, a household which cannot pay its mortgage
or its heating bills is not going to be able to invest in a
new roof or a new furnace. Over the coming years, maintenance
levels in the still solid neighborhoods must be closely
3/90

III-70

�•

r

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~JES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

. watched, especially the large multiples and the frame housing.
Joy and Linwood are severely distressed as commercial streets.
Industrial development in Rosa Parks is confined to the area
along or near the Grand Trunk Railroad and Conrail tracks at
the southeastern corner of the Subsector.
There is a large
amount of vacant land that is zoned for manufacturing which
could accommodate many new jobs.
The Rosa Parks Subsector,
as in the case of the remainder of the Sector, is deficient
in recreation space.
Ways must be found to preserve and enhance the basically solid
(and, in many cases, quite attractive) neighborhoods in the
Subsector.
Much of the Subsector 's housing was, when new,
among the most exclusive in the City and even now remains
among the most attractive of the City's low- and moderateincome communities.
Portions of the residential area to the south of West Grand
Boulevard are in need of many improvements.
This is the
oldest, and probably the most debilitated housing in the Near
Northwest Sector.
With excellent access to the New Center
area and to Henry Ford Hospital, this community could be seen
as a choice location, but the consolidation of vacant land and
the development of new housing is needed here, along with the
rehabilitation of the more viable blocks.
The Virginia Park Urban Renewal project area is located in a
community of well-constructed, viable housing which had
suffered from the effects of the 1967 civil disturbances.
Since then, the depopulation of large apartments and the
effects of continuing high unemployment have been further
negative factors. Continued implementation of infill housing
and housing rehabilitation and completion of the major housing
projects are needed.
Historic designation may be helpful in many portions of Rosa
Parks where development has reached and generally passed 50
years of age. LaSalle Gardens, the Dexter Boulevard frontage,
and other areas may qualify.
If the formal procedures of
historic designation are not deemed appropriate, it is
nonetheless important for the City to recognize the valuable
nature of these residential settings.
The conditions along Grand River Avenue and other commercial
streets such as Joy Road are an extremely negative factor and
give a very poor impression of a community where the housing
3/90

III-71

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

is by no means in bad condition.
Residential and local
commercial development should be encouraged and abrasive
general commercial land use discouraged.
Also, traffic
controls and signage on Grand River are a holdover from its
days as a major arterial (i.e.~ before the Jeffries Freeway
was opened) and perhaps should be reviewed.
The site of Olympia Stadium (now closed) should be examined
for possible reuse, when it becomes available. Also, vacant
land on Heritage Place (formerly Dumbarton)
should be
developed.
ROSA PARKS SUBSECTOR GOALS
This Subsector is one of the oldest areas of the City and has
many problems.
It is, however, well-located in terms of
access to many important centers and many of the remaining
structures are interesting and attractive architecturally.
Because of its location and character, this area should be a
good candidate for "recycling" by the private sector once the
right conditions are in place.
The following policies are
designed to address immediate problems as well as help begin
the process of renewal.
POLICY 304-10:

Rosa Parks Subsector Policies

Concentrate efforts to rebuild this Subsector
south of West Grand Boulevard.

in

the area

Change West Grand Boulevard east of 14th Street from general
business uses to high density residential use, or some other
appropriate land use type.
Encourage medium-density residential development on the vacant
land on Heritage Place (formerly Dumbarton).
South of West Grand Boulevard, consolidate vacant land and
develop new housing; rehabilitate viable housing.
In the Virginia Park urban renewal project area, complete
major housing projects, especially rehabilitation and infill
housing.
Change the Grand River and Joy Road local commercial areas to
a residential use.

3/90

III-72

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NEAR NORTHWEST SECTOR

Consider historic significance of LaSalle Park and vicinity,
the Dexter Boulevard frontage, and other qualified areas.

3/90

III-73

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC,J:ES

NORTH SECTOR

ARTICLE 305
NORTH SECTOR

NORTH SECTOR LOCATION AND EXTENT

The North Sector of Detroit is bounded by Woodward
on the west, Eight Mile Road on the north, Mt. Elliott on the
east, and on the south by the cities of Hamtramck and Highland
Park, and the Grand Trunk Western Railroad lines.
In addition to the cities of Hamtramck and Highland Park, the
North Sector borders the cities of Ferndale, Hazel Park, and
Warren.
Alt~gether, the North Sector is approximately 10.5
square miles, or 7.5 percent of the total land area of the
City of Detroit.
In terms of income, employment, age distribution and household
composition, the North Sector is very similar to the City as
a whole.
However, it has the largest proportion of foreignborn residents of all of the Detroit planning sectors.
NORTH SECTOR PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS

The elements most greatly affecting the future of the North
Sector are its industrial facilities,
its neighborhood
systems, and -- directly tied to neighborhoods -- its housing
stock.
The Sector's greatest potential
lies
in the
maximization of these three resources.
Industrial areas of the North Sector appear to have excellent
potential
for
continued
employment
opportunities,
for
expansion of select areas, and for continued support of the
economic base of the City, given the Sector's attributes of
location.
Central to the future of the North Sector is its neighborhood
systems.
The North Sector has many healthy neighborhoods on
which to expand; it has just as many neighborhoods with the
potential to become just as healthy as any of the best
neighborhoods of the Detroit metropolitan area.
The North Sector is a major trucking center, second in
importance only to the Southwest Sector (among Detroit's 11
planning sectors). Rail transportation, however, is of less
importance to the North Sector, for rail lines mainly serve

3/90

III-74

�•

auaa• CTOAa
THE

011'
NORTH -CTOR

PERSHING

NOLAN

'·

NORTH SECTOR

Davison Subsector .....••....•...... 305-9
Nolan Subsector •.••....•.•.•.•..... 305-7
Pershing Subsector ...•..•••.••..••. 305-8
State Fair Subsector ......•..•..•.. 305-6

j

�i

~B\&lt;i~

.
: •IIF

,

=\--•••--•••m•-••••••••-------•
•--••• --•
•••••••••••••
•,._• =
I •••••
'(,

I'

•• RI;! :

•

•••••••••••••••

~..

•

:1·

•

•

•I

•

•••••••••

B4

\.,.

.\

·:

\

ST!\TF.

1

• •: · · · - :

'• '52

:

:

I

· •

F/\111

:y,:
:itc

R1 &amp; R2

..

A2

••

GENERALIZED

t•

REZONING CONCEPT

i

•---,-•••~•••

......~ .

r·
i,:

RI
R2
R3
R4
RS

M4

; ,

1=11

~

R6

·1•••!!.•'!'••"!"••••\!_l_•••••i_

• ._

••

A2

M2,:

Dll

~••)'•••••••
F.

R4'-l

\

Ill \:.~ ~

(.)

(J• t~ •

::i
0

=1
,.· =

)

~·
,I F~••••••••••.;.·:

•

~

•

IJ

·.

:Vt:,

••

••

•·Jd

•: /•

...

1r. ,:

;1Jl

82

~ l i= A1

A

:-: :.Jf.
•t rt
-. ~

.t:..

••
•

,.... 1 .

Ri

,'.

~

84 \

:r:cr.: . - C

.\ .

,, ,•~

•

z

LJ . ,.,. .
.• •~~.:•

M2

1.

~ t :...

• -••-,a.,-~~~!•••••1••

O\JTL!l

\

A1

• !, •• :

••

•

7 P111F

-

w

'
•• •
~

c

/4 B4~

rm••••••••••~•••••••••--•• ••••--••"'!••••

••••••••••~•!oii•••• ••••• .. •••••••·••••••••• ••~

~'

•~..,

,J
•.

:1

1

~
••••••••••••=•• ••• ---f•.
:

• ,

~:;.·,~·~{!:-.~:.~~'...".-: ~~~ -:.,,:!'1J1~----,,·\~-::--~~~~~r::~:·=~:~·:~:~-1~ri!=:::c~::.:-:':~~:~:!i-\~~:.~~:·...~--::··--ir~~~=:~-:·:.=~,::.~·.-:.·::::·~: ... :~.:-: ~-~-=:-....I'~::!:::?:.~: - ~
•:···
=
'\
= =~,.: =
..
,. ·~:.......• r...
:•&amp;--:
:
\ •~
~:
~·1
i. ~ •
:
•• •.
I" ~
··\·/•
....~···· • -~1 : 1t:"'· :
~ ·0·· I B4 l
~
,. c,.

eb
1

•

:

.•

\:-:•.

• 1 •

R1&amp;A2

••1••

84
&amp;

R4

~S\.

M4

:

TM[M2&gt;-,!_ .• • · · · · • - "-~ &gt;

••

:

:

•

:

•• ••

:

••• •••

.,

:

•

... ••
..

R4

•

••

•

B2
•
•

\

•

..

•

: : : :• - . ~••

•
:

I

•

I

I
:

I

I

•

j

•

R2

,.h. .

\ • · •••••

~

•

·,

, •

•

••

•: -

•

\

•

•

•

•

,'\ •
\\;\

•

F=:1:1
•
'

~-

•

(..)

•

., •
~••

•
••

•••

u

.a4,

'-

:

,

,

~

•

•

l

~ •••

-,

M4

•••••••

~

;r.

....

._.,• . ..,•

I,

,.-

.:-:;t'A-· -·
-••,.,.)

. . . . . . . ~- ~
•• -•--t-1'~

U)

M 2

•

••·

i

PD

PLMNEO DEVELOPMENT

PR

PARKS and RECREATION

SD-4

PROPOSED SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
llNERFRONT MIX USE

'

~

'it
r..i)·
......= :a

f :-•····=
•••

:- •••••~ :1 M22

· • • • • , • O,

-..

UMfTED INDUSTRIAL
RESTRICTED INDUSTRI.Al
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
!NTENSNE INOOSTRIAf..
SPEC!Af.. : INDUSTRIAL

'

·

I\

.

-

'

A4

•

TM

:

I

I

-·

...

•• .,..,,,.

•

••
I

•

•

-

•
I

I

•

1

,1

:

t1,,,t}1 ~. • '

I :
•

"" -~~

... .., ....
.,..,...•

•*•; . ,•

A1

'

I • f -'

I

I

,CM4l :
••..... - ••• -- •••
- •• • •

~.

:...;.-M

R1

~

•••••••••••••••••!

,

•

B4:

M4

·.•• . •• • • .1.1
•

•

•

M2------ _ •• ,. ,••

•t

' I

}!--

•:

•

•• •

:7

R1
••

B4

::

• • • R1
M2,.........;.:. ••

•

',\\

~

•

\ ... ••••

• T M ~\ ··

1:

••

=·

A

'

I

't

111 (Ms)

B4~--

-

A1

-::::::::::....--.C:.C...'-....C....=
=::; '-.---- ~•••
\., ••
: , •
'I '
~
-_.---=====·-----..............................................................

•

N! 1/,\t),\

\ .;;

•

., 1

.)•

•
•

,•.

~

A1

Ml
M2
Ml
M4
M5

j
re~-.--.-..
1

C

.· i , i - F 1

•\"

I· = ., ·•~~••
. . •

•

-•

~ If

••

------:.,

__.1=14

•..
• •• •

R1

:

2
1=1

Jll~'t

•

•

:i ;~;
,\

•

:•
•

•·1-~,°1•l ·~

: lt~ ....

· 1·
•

=

1

:

•

•

aG • ;_

R1

•~

~ ': • •
r===-..:.:-...::=:::--=-=...•,;°,••• '

&amp;:---,+

••

••

• C:: •· '

\,

jj!--

84

•

'I',\

B4
• • ,-.:
L• • l/,, \I'\ t 11,

••.._ ••
__,,,,,.

~

•

1 ••

83
84
B6

•

•

•· ••

SINGL£·F AM/LY RESIDENTIAL
TWO-FMIIIY RESIDENTIAL
LON-DENSITY RESIDENTIAf..
THOROOGHFME RESIDENT!Af..
MEDIUM·DENSfTY RESIDENTIAL
HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENT!Af..
RESTRICTED BUSINESS
LOCAf.. BUSINESS/ RESIDENTIAL
SHOPPING DISTRICT
GENER.Al BUSINESS
GENERAf.. SERv'ICES

Bl
B2

/ M2

1

I

,.•,.,

\ ........

1=1 3

•

;

•

B4

••

a2

•

•

,.\

·•i

R4

f.l

........

•

1

R 1

R

••••••••\••••= ~;.:

!~•

•

.

•.\ \,R4/ae

M2-+ \

:

m ~ m w •-.

3

1;1

84

;I. ~ "
~~
a
••1•.-.••••••••
~

t;
"i
B ~11~ r• .__....~-.-••••••••t••

'

: 1~1:

B4\

~

~

·········: 1:,.B4,.....r~:r--······· . . ······.·········r~L.:-:!..:
• ill\ t
-""
;
·-1~\~:

···iJ.:

R2

~B4

I.
H~;.~~~~~-;;'Hir---··,:~~y;::::!!~!:::::~·:J,i~~r----::.:r'
=-~-- -~-.---~-,r,"--ri1
·~,,.--- ·-':""'--;:~r~::::.~--:,:--:·~.1----.. ,.~ - - -~;~ fl-----·rr
i:
~;t;c
l
:... :
!!'•••••..
~=~=
~
. i.

•• M2 :•••!

:

\

~lU

. ,:--

·f:::::::i............~ :..

\

. .. ..........~ ••_!1-:•m•11•...-.r::-••wWWW:WWW
r"111_E
~o
-----Ra:a•••••,•••_..

••••••

:j

Ra

••

t§

~! -~

•

•

·\;;;;:.•

;~~j

M4

·~.

•

·•••••!-!~~••••• 1, Mft r. ~, \; ·1'••••••"-••--••~..-.---~••-r•.• 11Jtll~ h MILE
• -.V.2
5 •••• .. ••••••••••••••••"~ ~·· 'TM (M31•R1
'._- =
•••••••--••••••••.S.•••••-•~-.~~~-;~~~.:._;.·~ ,;,-_~~~~;.~:.,......••..-......f':• (••••~-= ... , .. .&amp;...........~ , £,.~ ~~,! ............: ..... ••••••••11,~i
.. . . . . ;.,1:..,
i.:-=--~---·-·~~, ••••••••••••••• ~ \\ , . . . . .
• ........ ,,_,/,Ji,,,. •••••••••••••••• :
--···/··-- •• "':-._
t&lt;t
X ~_..
••'\.\\ •• B2
•• ,,. •
R3 ••• :'• ~,..•••
~ 4
: 1: . \
\ •·,t: j~~,.
M4 "'1 ~)~•'" ~;
•••••
•\--ft:
B4~\••• •••~;_.1;;;-&gt;••Jj B
: ,: ""~i,

1

-..

~...

•; 1

\

0CJ

0,

\

....~

"1)
0

• ~~\..
••"-~;:~

..-:r;---··'

,;;:,,'''

••

• • -~~\•-.,(-:V,4)
.. • i • ~

""•

M4

, ,\ •

R4~••

••

•

• '::-,•,

. ~:1\'f"
•
•• ••
\. •- • 't.'ill(~ ... ••• •••• •• ••
._ /• "-~'J••
• • •

Ae

'.', •

•

"\\ •,

•• ••
• •
• •

'•{

'. \\ • ·' ~\ .. :.-, ""':···

•
••· ., ~ ,p
•
.., . ) • (P ·. • ,,,,.
••
•• ••
,--::. ') ~'- ,_
\~
r,,."\'\ "f),_\f,-.,·
' ."• ... •,t:·~··
.'TM.
•
•
,•\,, ,l tr'··~
~JL. ••
.M2 • • \ :., ; ..~.;1 . ~

•,lp ·•~tX~.-"\ •• ••• ••
\...•
... -~:
1.:-~k;.,\.•••i•·-·4t ••• &lt;'__.,.,~,.,,•..-:.,:~l~
-~~rt~-i_,;v.
\: :--. : ,.!;._.~~•.;~\,.,A
, '. .:-~•~·iii:7-:J.rl
\,"f'.~ f
~ ,.:,;,

.-r •

.~ ...".~
~~• \

.. . ,. . ,}

' t : ~~:f
.
\ ~ •••.1'\!\.,

. . .......

·\

R2

--...•~;_;~
~~,.t,... .J...

.

M4

·.•

••

.

·· ·-···
~\

·\,
~

• ·,\·

•''. _:,,,,• --··
•t

:~~-

r \\' I ,.. ..-.

".·t;,z).

· •• •

• •~l/\

.-•

.. ··,{\
• .. \· -•

••* :-.

'-: ..:;!,

\; ·:; l

..,

•

R3

\ -•
" ,· ••

\ ~4
·\
\\

...

....-

•,.A .

r .:•
• , !• &gt;-

:: ;: ~;

f1

•,. \ • ••
, _

I
:J .

•
:

•

.

··.\\
,- .
--'\t..
•

~

•••••

.. •••••• ~~..
•

•

:::

C' • 1

AS

:: !;
.-=············-·
•..........: )Ei
,

. .

.'-..t,._,
94---.,---,.

r,2

\ \, ••
\ .. ••

-

\ ,.• •

I

/

'l
/t ·1
#4'._:_;::=..=!/
l
t·
.. ~
:
/-

-~:.

t.11

\.... ~'...
~ •::~

....

:

•

.I,

'

•

1

c it v lrr 11\I

&amp;

;,i IIC

I

:M• M3
• 2'!

..

\-~.•" • •. • •• • • • • • • • • • • • .\ • • •
'-l
\•l { \

:=·1
I

84

• •

·.,. "

11

·:•• re
,. 1.1,
11

• •••
~-• =1

. .... ••
' \ ••

·=

!:• ,:,... M2

r-.2

;1

• ,. •

"

•• •• \ •• •,
\ •• \ \ •-~• ••

A

.....

•

,\. •

•

••.•irt~.
..._ - .,.,,.2,.,,_A '

:•

.. .
. .&amp;" ,.\ --

\ ..~\\ \

• :•

)

• ,.. ...

R2

' •

f.

rl~

A4

•• •./'-,
••

I•

•

:

.

. y"'

A3

·..

• \,

R2

•..... ;.

••• •• ·'. \ \
I

\......

·&gt;·-•· • •\

•• '\ r'\
• • .•. ,
• ,..___..,..

•

I

~,

..~..-·.. -·

•• , ., •
--- ...

JP',

.. ft."1'5l:~ ..:-

Y.

.......... ••
•
.... ..

;~'f

•• 'J' .;r•,.•

• ,. ~;·........

•~•\ .~ ;;··:t-•,/ :_.i .. ~..
.. . !'.. ',.·
., .., .- •. ,..

A2

• 1•

•• "'""""---' •• .,• -~ e 4

•

••

~

-

•

Ill

/

..
.r
:

:

:

•

•

~
':

l j

.

..

NORTH SECTOR

�•
THE ~OIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC,J:ES

NORTH SECTOR

through traffic.
The Sector is not heavily industrialized;
there are very few active rail sidings here, and no rail
classification yards (areas used for switching and freight
trains linking up) or terminals remaining active.
The construction of the planned Light Rail Transit (LRT)
system along Woodward will have an important impact on the
North Sector. The regional transportation plan calls for the
development of a LRT system in the Woodward Corridor from
downtown Detroit to the northern suburbs.

POLICY 305-1:

North Sector Land Use.

the economic development potential for the near
future at the State Exposition and Fairgrounds, major
intersections along Woodward Avenue, and industrial areas.
Develop
intense
residential-commercial
uses
at
major
intersections along Woodward related to future light rail
transit station development.

Maximize

POLICY 305-2:

North Sector Residential Development

Encourage the continuation of low-density single-family areas
while encouraging the development of moderate-density housing
along under-utilized major and secondary thoroughfares and the
development of high-density housing near future light rail
transit stops.

POLICY 305-3:

North Sector - Commercial Development

Consolidate commercial strips and incorporate medium-high
density residential uses. For most commercial strips, lower
intensity of use from General Business to Local Business or
to a residential zone. Establish appropriate commercial uses
along Woodward, Eight Mile Road, and the Chrysler Freeway
entry points to take advantage of heavy automobile traffic.
Improve both the appearance and function of the commercial
areas.

POLICY 305-4:

North Sector - Transportation System

Develop the Woodward Avenue light rail transit system.

POLICY 305-5:

North Sector - Recreation System

Build a new indoor/outdoor community recreation facility west
of Ryan.

3/90

III-75

�•
STATE

EXl

-

•

RC - sp,ec.1.al Reudential-Ccamerc:ial
INaT - ?119titu,tional
IND - C.neral Indu.at.n.al
LT. IND - Light Induatrial
Cll

i ...
:uw,••

}.

•._

CC .. Ccap..r1. • on Cc:amarc1.al

MUA .. Mixed UM Re • ident.ial
0
Open Space
POSIT - Port
C M - CetN1:ery

i ·\

.... ...... ..

•....

• -

c••-••••-~~••--•••••••••1• • - - - ~ ;.~--~-;.;.·
;
_~.; , .

••••

•

=·

IND

*-

: '':8-•·

\

- Oiatr1.buei0n Ind.u • t.rl.&amp;l

8C - Special CC-rcial
RLC • R.e • identJ.al/t.oc:al ~ r c i a l
OC - General Coaaarc:ial

....: ...

IIILM

•T

MC - Major C~rcial

-i.l.

...\

a

RLM - Low-Mec:Uum Dim. • ity Re • idencial
RM - Medium D•n • icy Rea:Mlencial
AH - High o.n..1.ty Reeidential

···.•.

-

caaNaAAL

LANO U •

AL - Low Density R•ai.denti.al

............

i.• o,r.:·

• TINCil

FAIR

i.'
:
, t •••

,11..M

::
:i:~

\\_

u~:
I

w :~
.! .j--.::-M- =--=--~

\..
\

:

...

:

=-.=.=

'1 •••

::

1 UICh I

..,._, •.A•

::

....

-=_

IND

::

..

Pb.ytield

:.,-·-.....;~

·.,____; L ..........·-····.:;:.;~?t
\ me

-

2000ft .

-

~v,.
~
c::=
'-=--I,

0

0.0

,-----, =

.25

.50

75

1.0

"'''-

NORTH SECTOR

STATE

R

RM - Jl'lediua Den• ity Re • ll,CW:nt.1.al
RH - Ri9h O.ndty Reu.d.eneial

,.._____,____""'__
C

• AC -

~

Inatitutional
IND - O.naral Induatru.l

LT. IND - t.iqht Inctu • crial
0111T - Diatribuu.on Indu•ui.al

~
-- I L '

MC - Major ca..rcial

ft

-~··-················:
---~ ,.... :

•••••••••--••••••-

:

:

.•• . .....
\

IND

:-

~-•••\

i y•e..c

...

:

:

•M

Open

sea~

- Caiatary

*-

Playfield

- - Proposed Transit Station

1

s . . A.poandix for axplui.ation of cateqori••

,l. ,\.. -~..

c-- \ .. •._

J..' :\~.;.

: !

...

o• C

\\ \ · .~

: -·
.r;.
••••••p

••

\

spee1.al c~rc1.al
Re • ident.ial/ Loc:al COlllaarcial
Genaral c onni.rc1.al

PORT- - Port

: ::

•~

-

Compa.r1. • on Commarcial
MUR - Mixed Uaa R&amp;a1.dent1.al

:

I•

\\.. •••••••••••••~~ "M
••

:

SC
RLC
GC
CC

--

! ·-

cac~ :
••

:

~~~9t· ~~

: :*::\

AL

Special R• • id-,.U.al-C~rcial

IN.,.. -

\

\ __ ···
cac

u••

RL - t.ov O.n • ity Ra • idanti&amp;l

..~. \\.
c.&gt;

• CCMMaNaaa ~UTUR •
caaN • RAL LANO

RLM - t.ow-f(ediua oen • ity Re • id•neial

JaA.llltaRCIUNIDa

- - •- -

FAIR

ALM

- ~

111
.,,

1 ,ncPI

••,:.i

1

2000N.

\........J l:.............l~S~?-i
-....
~

.,,.

~~

me
0.0

.25

50

7$

..

1.0

c_:::::r==c::::::f=='
...,....,

NORTH SECTOR

State Fair Subsector •••••••••...•.• 305-6

III-75A

'"'

.

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

NORTH SECTOR

STATE FAIR SOBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND F-EATURES
A largely residential area bounded by East Eight Mile, Grand
Trunk Western Railroad, Highland Park city boundary, and
Woodward Avenue.
A major land use of this unit is the
Michigan Exposition and Fairgrounds.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, STATE FAIR SOBSECTOR
In general, the overall condition of State Fair's housing
areas is fair to good.
As in many other areas of the City,
however, there is a need for a full range of measures to halt
deterioration, including the clearance of obsolete structures,
encouragement of reinvestment, disposal of vacant lots, and
rehabilitation of the housing stock.
The potential of a future Woodward Avenue transit corridor is
particularly important to this subsector and could stimulate
a great deal of new development, especially in conjunction
with possible new uses of the State Fairgrounds, such as for
a year-round regional conference center.
There is much healthy commercial development in this area but,
as in many other areas, there appears to be an over-abundance
of commercially zoned land,
and there is a
lack of
organization : convenience and general commercial as well as
light industrial uses are mixed together in no apparent order.
Industrial areas are basically viable, but there are problems
relating
to land-use conflicts between
industrial and
residential areas. In some cases, expansion of industry into
obsolete residential areas is appropriate; in others, better
buffering between the two uses is necessary.
There is a need for more and better recreation facilities in
the area.
Finally, the concentration of Arab-Chaldeans in the Seven
Mile-John R area affords an opportunity for a special ethnic
village type of development, similar to that in Greektown.
The Seven Mile commercial frontage already has a very strong
ethnic character and could be developed further with the
interest and involvement of the local business community.
Of special note is the area east of John R which, based on
the level of complaints, suffers from several environmental
problems often linked to quality of health.

3/90

III-76

�IP

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTH SECTOR

STATE FAIR SUBSECTOR GOALS
This area has great potential. The State Fairgrounds should
become an increasingly important regional center on a yearround basis, bringing a major influx of cultural and economic
activity into the area. The neighborhood housing, with proper
care and
attention,
should
become
more
desirable
as
improvements are made and new economic activity materializes.
The commercial areas, once they become better organized and
upgraded, can provide convenience shopping as well as general
commercial services of a more regional nature.
Finally, as
the success of Greektown and other ethnic enclaves has
demonstrated, there is vast potential for a thriving ethnic
community here which can bring new vitality to the entire
subsector.

POLICY 305-6:

State Fair Subsector Policies.

Implement a variety of housing strategies throughout the area
including spot demolition and the offering of vacant lots to
adjacent
homeowners
as
well
as
the
full
range
of
rehabilitation measures. Work with community groups to clean
up and maintain vacant lots until an appropriate permanent use
is determined.
Encourage
private
reinvestment
programs
similar
to
Neighborhood Housing Services and decreased mortgage interest
programs in the area bounded by Woodward, Seven Mile, John R,
and McNichols.
In the area east of John R, concentrate spot
demolition of vacant structures along with a vacant lot cleanup campaign; encourage new housing construction in this area
while also considering potential land acquisition for a
neighborhood-oriented park.
Encourage the implementation of both the light rail and the
Michigan State Exposition and Fairground Master Plan.
In
conjunction with these plans, encourage intense mixed use
development near proposed transit stations.
Implement programs to provide better organization and esthetic
improvements on commercial strips so that convenience shopping
is clustered into mutually reinforcing nodes and general
commercial and light industrial uses are not in conflict with
neighborhood-oriented activities.
Encourage the continuation and, where feasible, the expansion
of the industrial uses within the State Fair subsector.
Insure that new industry is environmentally compatible with
surrounding
development,
and
provide
better
physical
3/90

III-77

�•
THE DETROIT MA~ PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTH SECTOR

definition between industrial and residential areas.
Where
• residential uses are adjacent to industrial uses, encourage
the development of landscape-screens and/or other appropriate
buffering.
Encourage industrial expansion _in blocks which are clearly
dominated by vacant and unkempt lots, vacant and dilapidated
structures, and where industrial encroachment is already
apparent. To ease this transition, first encourage and assist
the few remaining families to move into better housing within
this same subsector, employing an area vacant housing
"rehabilitation and occupancy" program. Prior to such action,
obtain a firm commitment from the private sector for
industrial expansion.
Increase nearby neighborhood playground space for children.
Consider expansion of existing school playground sites and
encouragement of access to part of the State Fairgrounds for
neighborhood use.
Encourage the development of a bicycle
route via Outer Drive East and West, State Fair, Palmer Park,
and West Seven Mile.

-

Work with the Chaldean community to explore the potential of
development of a strengthened and more "tourist" oriented
ethnic district along the Seven Mile commercial frontage.

3/90

III-78

�•
NOLAN
l!Xl
•

•

; ..

.r·····

QC

·\.~::~:--!:::'

ac? •
•• ••••••

•

ALM

\

,..._

RH - HJ.qh Oena1.t.y R•a1.dent..J.&amp;l

• RC

- Special Rea1.dane1.al-Coaaerc:1.al
INIIT - In • ti.tution&amp;l
INO - General Induai:.rial
LT. INCi - Light. Induatri.al

CIC

.: ::TI·
..
:j .: '•!··

\•-1:
. .
,..

~

IN

:

\
V - ;.

•LM

;i
\,:
·,.

·= :
:

&gt;:

:

...

~

•T

:

-: :
~! !

CIIIT - OutriDUtion Induau1.al

.

••

MC - Major caaa.rc:ial

...

AL

: .:

\

IIC - Spacial ec:a-rcial
RLC - Reaideneial/Local c:cas.rcial

..

\

CIC - Gen•ral Comnerci.al
CC - C0111p&amp;ruon c~rcial

··. .

MUR - Mixed U•• Re • idantial
ep.n Space
PORT - Port
C M - cemeury
Play tield

···········--········-················
~~•••••••••••••••-'ISi. •• -~ •••.,;.......:

~••••4g••••;

• •

Q N
RAL.
LANO U • &amp;

RM - MediWll Oena1,.ty R•aMS.enei.al

'-\\

·····:
.
.·..
•.\ . ·-- ...··············t
...............I ········----·····-···
rr: t ............aw..- ..=:::

·\.

• TINQ

RL - Low oenai.cy •••i.dential
RLM - Low-Nedium Cenaity Reeidentu.l

a• -

!

•

*-

AL

.

·\

1

•.
., ·.•

\_-.....

'le~-

\\.

Ml,,.£ \".·.

-~\..

.I-·· : ·-~----:~

-.::..:: ~----

.-••~:::..t;DallM✓

--••••

~

\'.;;_»

- - • - • • • • • • ••••••·•

See

~

t

tor explanation of c:ateqori••

I Inch 12000ft.

-

ING ✓•-

DC

0

1.T IND

o.o

.so

.2,

.n

1.0

c::::::::r==1:::::::...i'="""'

NORTH SECTOR

·4. 04-2

-

NOLAN

R

•

..c

---7

-.t·

AL

RL - Low oanu.ey Re • idential
Low-filed.iu:m Oen • ity Reeidentia.l

RLM -

RM - !Olediu:m Oen • ity R•• id.ential

RM - Riqh Den • icy Re • idanti.al

~...

• RC -

special Re • idential-co..rcial
INST - Inatitutional
IN0 - General. Induatrial

:---··-·-··-:--·····
,. .·-.s.--=-:.--, ..

:t;_l

.....,.., . . .""

....:-.---=-.-

: : _ ••• R'si-....... _ •••• Jlt'

-

LT. IN0 - Liqht Indu • trial
ClaT - Distribution Ind:u • trial

AL

.

=~
=:

1N9T

. . . . ..

.·~
:

•-•••••Q•C••••••••:_.. _::::::::--•::=.- ::==~

LT IN D.,.jl,,o~..

00

• C0MM • N0• 0 "UTUR•
Q • N • RAL L.AN0 U ••

QC

............n. ......... - ..............

}
,,

MC - Major Cc:mnarc:1.al
IIC - Special C~rcial
RLC - Re • idential/LocaJ. Coa.rcial
CIC - General Com1111:rc1.al
CC - Compariaon Commerci.al
MUR - Mixed U•• Re • idential
0 • - Open Sp&amp;c•
PORT - Port
C M - Cemetery

•

AL

Sae

*-

Playt'ield

~

t

tor explanation of cataqorie •

I Inch 12000ft.

0

-

1,,,

1

-

c==~~
0.0

.25

.JO

.7S

1.0

c::::::J=:::,C-:::Jr:::::::::::,

4.04-3

Nolan Subsector .••••••••••••••.•..• 305-7

NORTH SECTOR
III-78A

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~_IES

NORTH SECTOR

NOLAN SOBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
The Nolan -Subsector is a predominantly residential area
bounded by Eight Mile, Conant, McNichols, the Chrysler Freeway
to Seven Mile, and the Grand Trunk Western Railroad to Eight

Mile.
This area and its population appear to be relatively stable:
poverty levels are about the same here as for the City as a
whole.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, NOLAN SUBSECTOR
In essence, the residential areas of this subsector appear
healthy but are not without signs of need for repair:
deterioration is evident in the oldest, frame structure areas,
but the overwhelming majority of the stock is either sound or
clearly rehabilitable.
The communities' efforts to upkeep
their homes and grounds is evident, yet many of the structures
are aged and thus their need for major structural repairs is
beginning to outpace the resident's ability to make such
repairs along with routine maintenance.
The environmental conditions of this subsector are also very
good.
With rare exception, neighborhoods are clean, wellmaintained, and quiet.
Since few obnoxious uses are present
in the subsector, very few conflicts between uses exist. With
the exception of the area around Jerome and McNichols,
infringement of industrial uses into residential areas is nonexistent.
There are problems of poor organization and some deterioration
of commercial uses.
NOLAN SOBSECTOR GOALS
This subsector is relatively in good condition now, and with
the implementation of the following policies, the area should
become an increasingly stable and desirable residential
community.
POLICY 305-7:

Nolan Subsector Policies

Implement a full range of housing rehabilitation measures
where needed, including rehabilitation of low- and moderateincome housing through community group activities, vacant
housing rehabilitation and occupancy, and the encouragement
of cooperative private reinvestment.
Concentrate these
efforts in the older areas such as near the railroad and the
3/90

III-79

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLiClES

NORTH SECTOR

freeway, but also utilize all measures to prevent blight in
the stronger areas.

Reorganize commercial strips: demolish obsolete structures,
provide off-street parking, where needed encourage facade
improvements and sign control, ~nd establish Seven Mile and
Conant as the two primary concentration of local commercial
activity, encouraging residential use in~ the other strips
(except McNichols).
Retain Eight Mile as a general commercial strip. Continue the
development of McNichols as a light industrial and business
services area.
R€solve the recreational inadequacies of this subsector as
opportunities arise; expand selected existing recreational
facilities when feasible. Acquire land for development of a
community-sized playfield and a number of component playfields
as opportunity permits.
Encourage industrial uses within Nolan to remain, but continue
expansion of existing industrial acreage only to the area
between Jerome and McNichols.
Encourage amenable and
~ntensive industries to locate in this triangle .

•

3/90

III-80

�PERSHING

• • AAL.
••

llXlaTINCI Cl N
L.ANCI U

RL • Low Den•it:y Re • ic:t.nU&amp;l
RLM - Low-Mediua oimi • it.y wte•identi &amp;.1

ia\_
:.J....,
.....-::.::~--r:::-:::-:::-::-::-::""'31!"':-:::..,t-=...!-------.,..;:-...-.::--:::,::::::::;r,--~
, :'····;
:
t~r
!_.:t~ *oa i
·r----:
...
~
i
:
i*oa: i
..-r-.
:
: .'
•
,..,~
..i.,;,,._,;,•----..:...~ - -...M"!~e!~~-ll!!i~·.·.:t.;;.-=
~
:'-T.l"'"":
f
:...-...i
'
\
)
h

r . ,....

08

RL

••

911L

:

:~

:

t

IND

...

:

••

:

:

INaT....... :

:

~.

:: I

•

•••: INST

:

F,

:

. :

,...

~·

!

RM - Mediw:a D&amp;nait.y JteaM!entl.&amp;l

RH - High Denai.ty Reaident.i&amp;l
RC - Special R• aidenti&amp;l-C~rei.al
INST - Ina t i tut. i onal
IN0 - General tndU11t.rial
LT. IN0 - t.ighe Induauial
Dl T • Dhtrikn,11:.ion In.dun.rial
MC - Maj or ccaaarcial
IIC - Spacial C~rc1&amp;l
R&amp;..C - Re • W.ntial/t.oca1 CC-reial

•

•

CIC - eaen.ral coamarcial
CC - Cc:apariaon c011aarcial
MUA - Mixed u.. Rea i da.nt.ial

• -

0
Open S~ee
POAT - Port:
C M - c . . . t•ry

•

-

···-.:L·'::::.=;·
=':.--..-····
•••••../2:!~.---·····
............:"!t:':~•.:.
· ~ .....:! -7~::;.:
...:.~~;.~...-. .~.:;~::-:;.;;.~~:;:,~.~-=-=-~

*-

Playti•ld

"I . . . .

IIINaT'

•

i

•

'--¼:
!- :

'"'-

INST~

i--:::..c

:.:.J

=:: .

!. !.
•

•

,-

'"'-

.rE

a

,t_,.

1 tftCf'I

I

2000ft .

.....

0
0 .0

25

.50

.75

,------.,

1.0

,----,

NORTH SECTOR

•

PERSHING

•

•

RIICCIMM NCl CI
flUTUA
Cl N RAL. 1.ANCI U

• •

·······---··;,1_•···:
••

··:

-e:.
'\

:

I==·····*

=====:=.·········

------= ~ :-"'

IN

I

I

INC LT. INC -

a*• ••• -

-.
AL

,·

CJC - General Cc:.aerc.i.al
CC - Ccaparuon Caaaercial
MUA - Mixed UH Re • idential
Ca - Open Space

I

AL

_

-~
-,

8C - Spec.i.al c~rcial
RLC - Rea1.dent1.aU t.ocal cc-rci&amp;l

·IND"-i.,

-4~

:

•t

r:2

PORT - Port

C

t-·······---··.:.-,--·-·······-···-·------··
·-·
:,.-w:;-;~
•

RLC

_.

I

_.,;.

\---•••-l==:i••-'••••••••••
.. ••••••"g••••••••••••• .. ••••
IJt.ia'T
•

1

i

')(ac

'•

. .,_

\,

AL

\
•

I

:

:I:
J:

.=-~+-;

:

:

:

•

•

t

T
:

....

RM

:
I

•M

- Cemetery

*-

Playtield

•

•41

:
I

:

i.!'.':~.-.:~

Riqh. oen• iey Reaident.ial
Special Raaidential-C~rci&amp;l
tnatitutional
General tndu.aerial
Light tnduaerial

ClaT - O.ht.ril::rution Indu• trial
MC - Major ccamerc.i.al

•!

: - I--~-·
- -;:::;t•••••...,...

- I..ov-Medium oen.aity Aaaidential
- Medium Oen • ity Re • W.nt.ial

•

___
.,__...,
--·r:.~.D
•• :=.

:-"'!

:

RL.M
RM
RH
SIIC
IN.,.

me

INST

~

\

•

RL. - Low Denait;y Raaidential

: :
INST

••

s-

~

tor explanation ct cat.egori••

Ai
1

IND

1

0
0.0

.25

.50

.75

1.0

··-

c:::::::Jr-------,~

NORTH SECTOR

Pershing Subsector •••••••••••.••.•. 305-8

III-BOA

......

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTH SECTOR

PERSHING SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
The Pershing Subsector is a predominantly single-family
residential area bounded by Eight Mile, Mt. Elliott, Nevada,
and Conant.
It is quite stable and family-oriented, with
income levels well above City averages.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, PERSHING SUBSECTOR
Although this is a family-oriented community, there is a need
to address the general increase in one- and two-person
households by providing smaller dwelling units in multi-family
structures.
The problems of lack of organization and overabundance of
commercial strip frontage exist to some extent here, as does
the need for a better interface between industry and adjacent
residential or local commercial uses.
PERSHING SUBSECTOR GOALS
The Pershing Subsector is one of the more affluent and
desirable neighborhoods in Detroit. The fundamental goal is
to preserve and enhance the area as a family-oriented
residential community with sound, well-maintained housing,
attractive, convenient shopping, and protection from blight,
crime, and the effects of land-use conflicts, through the
implementation of the following policies.
POLICY 305-8:

Pershing Subsector Policies

Diversify the present housing stock to address the housing
needs of the smaller one- and two-person households through
the development of apartments and townhouses and other forms
of multi-family structures. Encourage a variety of ownership .
types, including condominiums and cooperatives.
To prevent altering the basic single-family home ownership
character of this subsector, to avoid disruption of existing
neighborhoods, and to meet the transportation needs of such
higher density housing, limit this new multi-unit development
to
areas
along
under-utilized
major
and
secondary
thoroughfares, especially Nevada, Seven Mi le, and Conant.
Provide physical esthetic improvements along these frontages
to create desirable environments for multi-family housing.
Maintain a consistently high level of quality in housing
through code enforcement, structural rehabilitation programs,
community organization,
and cooperative programs
among
3/90

III-81

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTH SECTOR

community
and
business
groups
and
local
financial
' ins ti tut ions.
Continue to provide maintenance and needed
improvements to the Sojourner Truth project.
Concentrate programs specifically designed to encourage
rehabilitation and occupancy o~ vacant housing, such as the
Nuisance Abatement Program, in the area south of Outer Drive.
Remove obsolete commercial structures.
Off-street parking
means should be investigated and implemented where feasible
and encourage facade improvements.
Encourage new residential and local commercial on both Conant
and Seven Mile. Retain Eight Mile in general commercial uses.
Encourage industrial uses within Pershing
Subsector to
remain. Recognizing present land use activities, structures,
lot depth, and accessibility, retain the industrial uses in
the Mt. Elliott corridor.
Consider reuse of vacant parcels
and buildings for high technology, robotics, or similar
industries.

•

Give special consideration to the treatment of industrial land
which faces or is adjacent to residential or commercial uses.
Encourage such areas to be used as visitor entrance areas, for
the executive offices or other administrative functions rather
than for the industrial functions.
Develop a full-service recreation center including a gym and
pool at either Farwell Park or Krainz Park.
In addition,
promote improvements to Farwell, including permanent bleachers
and support buildings.
Expand Krainz Park as opportunity
permits. Encourage a park-type setting at Farwell Playfield.

3/90

III-82

�•

QC-3,;:\••---~•----=~=========--=-=_:__-_-_-_------... ... i i

\ • • RL

:

,

"""""""••--••-•• . . ••

•••-'

·····-:--··· ·=

IND

:

:

:

.
.
\f
tJ::i..:.::~;r"-''-::'.:f ".J~;J I-.... .. . ,..........
--~---•••••·--···
. ·-··
.•. ..•••.....
- ••.,,.Y______
--.·•-•. •... • •••....•· .....~•
···••;-·
~···=·~7.:i
.-.........,,-:........
• ·.•.
a=-·• i•
..~·.......' ,................ .. ...,.,___..-...
. ....
,...::--J
·-·...•
,···-'.
.
'
-··~
......
.
"
.' .'
.•\ ·••·' " ·.'·..o,..... ,,.;;;·•.t&gt;:-r
. ·.--·
,_
- : ··- .... :

_,,}·. .· ..-·. ·. . . .

•••• .,.. ~··· •• ••

••

, •• ·•.?V,
,/· ·..,.-.

:•

•

ALM

' \

,

'-

..

'f.i",N Tl-••:••• \

I

•.,····

......... _

. _ ···~~~.

✓--\ ......• (.

'(••••• ;..,~;;}.

00

'.
••......•ND............
:: --.•_:...,ac

'

: .

I •I

• IND •

....-, •

·····-:

:-

:U:

::

'r.iii:!

;-,. _ *-·~' • ,···--·4
\\:-•.J:;.:

.

ALM

. . .,

oc~.··-....-j'fa/j\\

0

&lt;

·.•;•··

:,~&gt;···
' \... . _
•
{.- , ......

· •:

\~

::°e'Ht!: •:

• ' ~·····

.d~~--········ \·:

' ,.-

'

.,,,-:.,·•

-

'

../

:1..&gt;.1
RM

·-

...

• ..,.._

::j

.r I.

, :

I
I

:···-·-'

'

- \\

,

'

i

..

:&gt;~l

1-----===CP.=V::,=sc=N=======:,r=:LT=&gt;~~&lt;N~O~~-~, .~=:n.~r;olT~;~;.: : : : -·\~;._lf
• INC - Liih
Induat.=l.&amp;l
01ST _
t Ind.u•t:ia.l
Dhtributi

MC - ,ta3or C
SC _

1

on Induat:rial

lftC" t

2000ft.

c:amarcial

RLC _ :peeu.l c:aaarcial
GC _ e • l.dantl.al/Local
General
Cc:.mrc:ia.l
CC _ c

ec-rcial

r=d

0

MUR .. M~~ar i aon c::mu:cial
OB - Ope

UH Reaidenc.u,l

0c::::::J~o
.0
25

.1s

~
,.o ,... ..

c__J===:J

PORT - Per: Sp•c•

11.,~1.,

CEM - comoeo:v

*-

P l ay!.:.e~d

NORTH SECTOR

•

ac

,

·-·;-. \.- .

·-··-......
~:···r··--·-·--·-'. f..............:;;';'.:::::::.~.~.=--·i--·-·; -

A:..\

, ·~

'

' " .. '

~ ,:::~:'.':""''"J;;c1r""
..... 1

\"" \.~~.'.~.::~

c•

;; -

,· ••

• ..• .._~,•\ IN•----~j;.....
• ,.......
\ '.. .... l. .,
...:., _....,..-f' ••• 1I .. ',
. \ \ .\ _..;.-- •..__....,.,:.w. .. .....................................~-:.,-(:, : 11
!
. '. .,. -...
•:·
....
•...
·.
..
·.
..
.
.
..,..-,,,..;
,..
'
'
'
.
,..
.
..
,...
.
.
.
·.
'.
····¼
,...
=........
J
\ •... _-.•. ,; X ·• ••
\\
·•.i··.~·······
. •:,t:.·: ..........::::;---:.-.·. -• • 'I
•• •• .'• w. •• ••
"j •••-:
'NO--.:.. , ·'-"
.,.
...
.
.
,
.
..
.
,
.
.......
.
.,
•..,~• \~•• \ \ ' •.&lt;, .~;.----• ••• ,, -••••"•..•
'••
;;..
«

ONO

•

: OM

.......... ,

0, •

ac

.

,

0,

• , •• .• o,

• 0,

,

••

•• ••

M

•

•

'

•

•--••

-..•• ••• ••••••~•\ ._••

:

RM

•

RL

*

,

..\ .
'~··
...--:.•·:,;;·&lt;-.
" - ••
:l...
:f •
..··.•··~·:),&lt;;.,/
'•1. Y•..\
-~,\-a;:l
d
' ·it#
~,;
'=•,:;;........,p
' • ...
·,,.;.
p·• &lt;7 ••- •'.:·•\ ••\•\ ·· •\\\

·

~

=·

,_&gt;-

·1.··

.. . .

.. .

CAVISON

OB

!' ••• ii,:
;• :.,I
'I

ii~'
&lt;l

.. :r::::::!.i

. . . . .. .~J:=::::
.............:,\&lt;••.. -- -~·
\.. ..
·••\

,--- ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-=-•-••_••••••' \

•o

··- .......:
i' ••.-·• :i'

. '.~:':'-k:,--··
·'.'" \\\\
..• ··r..
•. •.: -:,:;!!P
\~\i~_.••'\\

......,

I

•

. ''""

l

•c~!ili ~&gt;•/

"M

\'• \ \ , _ _ _ _

LT ;NO - Ganer!.!
• NO _ :..:.:;he. ~
01ST ~:u::.usc.:-:..i.l
0:. st.:- 1.":::u::..1.on ~
MC - !'i&amp;Jor ,..
~:-:dust.r:.al
SC _
... cm:::aerc:1a l

~.:

1 t rlCf"t , 2000'1

ALC - Spec:1.al Cc::m:ier GC - aeud•neul, Lo::: ' Ge nera l C
C-n,na:rc:1al

M CC - Comporuo:'.':"roul
UA - !&lt;11.xed Us • Re~•rc1al
OS - Open 5
-C.er.t1al
~ORT - ?ort

*:

CEM

pac:e

0

"'

oor===l
2~
50
c:=_f==7

75

~
10

~
ll110fftete,

Ce!N!t11r;

Play!ield

NORTH SECTOR
C ,, hc:or+-,-......-

�.•

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN QF_ POLI.c.IES

NORTH SECTOR

DAVISON SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Davison Subsector is bounded by Hamtramck and Highland
Park on the south and west, Mt. Elliott on the east, and on
the north by McNichols f rem Conant west, and Nevada from
Conant east.
Land uses are primarily residential with a
significant amount of industrial.
This subsector
is
relatively less affluent than other subsectors in the area
with older housing and greater need generally for remedial
action.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES-, DAVISON SUBSECTOR

Sixty percent of Davison i s -, - general residential structures
(structures of eight or less housing units) are over 55 years
old. With close to 90 percent of its stock built over a 20year
period,
Davison's
stock
lacks
sufficient
age
diversification to allow phasing of major repairs and
replacement for normal attrition.
In many of the housing areas, deterioration has already set
in to the point of requiring substantial rehabilitation.
Because Davison is centrally located in the region and is
bounded and traversed by two freeways, two rail lines, and six
major thoroughfares, it is well-suited for uses requiring
centrality and high accessibility such as distributing and
manufacturing.
Thus, economic development potential for this subsector
largely in industrial intensification and expansion.

is

The construction of a State prison complex on the site
adjacent to the Detroit Terminal rail yard should bolster
economic development in the area.
Expansion and intensification potential exists for the
McNichols-Dequindre area. Its present uses are low intensity
(both in labor and capital), and vacant and under-utilized
land is present both within the industrial area itself as well
as between the Chrysler Freeway and the Highland Park water
reservoir.
Davison's residential areas, as previously indicated, are in
a variety of conditions.
Most need rejuvenation either
through rehabilitation or reconstruction. Only one area, the
area south of Jayne Playfield, does not appear to need public
assistance to remain healthy.
This area, though, should be
watched for signs of deterioration as a large proportion of
3/90

III-83

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTH SECTOR

the structures are 60 years old or older.
In addition, many
problems may exist without any readily visible indications
from the outside.
Commercial
support
service
for
Davison
is
considered
inadequate.
While having substantial commercial acreage
zoned, the subsector lacks a local convenience shopping
district.
While Conant and Seven Mile commercial frontage
serve the other subsectors in this capacity, no equivalent
strip is located in Davison.
Consideration should be given
either to downgrading a few contiguous block faces to local
commercial, or to the development of a small local convenience
shopping district or node.
Land use conflicts exist in a number of places. Examples of
such places include the area between residential areas and the
freeways; between industrial areas; and, possibly, between the
reservoir and residential areas.
Improvements in recreational facilities are needed, both in
terms of additional land and facilities improvements.
DAVISON SUBSECTOR GOALS

Although the Davison Subsector has some severe problems in
terms of deterioration, lack of maintenance and poor land use
organization, the future potential for revitalization is good.
By reinforcing the strength of the industrial areas and
allowing some expansion where needed into certain obsolete
residential areas, a solid economic base can be established,
providing well-paying jobs for area residents.
Increased
income, combined with the implementation of the following
policies, should insure the future of this community as a
desirable neighborhood with sound housing close to places of
employment.
POLICY 305-9:

Davison Subsector Policies

Give special consideration to the treatment of industrial land
which faces or is adjacent to residential or local commercial
uses.
Encourage such areas to be used as visitor entrance
areas, executive business offices or other administrative
functions, rather than for industrial functions.
Provide
landscape buffer screening where needed. Consider expansion
of industrial uses into residential areas where additional
industrial
land is needed,
especially in areas where
industrial encroachment is already occurring, where there is
already a mix of residential and industrial uses, or where
isolated small pockets of housing are surrounded by non3/90

III-84

�•

i

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLLO.ES

NORTH SECTOR

Insure that there is no truck traffic,
residential uses.
, odors, noise, dust, unsightly views, or other environmental
impacts from such industrial expansion within remaining
residential areas.
Focus
neighborhood
cooperatLve
reinvestment
programs,
involving the community and local financial institutions, in
the area south of Jayne Playfield.
Throughout the Davison
Subsector, employ code enforcement programs in conjunction
with grant and loan programs. Use spot demolition to remove
obsolete structures. Encourage the formation of 40- and 45foot wide lots by selling half-lots to adjacent property
owners.
In conjunction with this, encourage property owners
to build garages and pave side drives to alleviate on-street
parking congestion.
Provide the Davison Subsector with well-planned convenience
shopping through the creation of a smaH convenience shopping
district or node. Consolidate general commercial uses toward
major intersections, and rezone excess commercial land.
Encourage such commercial frontage improvements as provision
of off-street parking, better maintenance and landscaping,
sign controls, and facade improvements.
Provide improved recreation facilities through acquisition of
adjacent land, where needed, and through implementation of
planned improvements to the Lasky Recreation Center, including
barrier-free access and improved maintenance.
Insure that the construction of the new prison facility will
have no adverse effects on the surrounding community.

3/90

III-85

�•

l

- - .. -THE D.E':CROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

ARTICLE 306
NORTHEAST SECTOR

NORTHEAST SECTOR LOCATION AND EXTENT

The Northeast Sector lies north of an area bounded on the
south by East McNichols, Conner, Edsel Ford Freeway and Alter
Road, with Mt. Elliott forming its western boundary.
The
north boundary, East Eight Mile Road, also forms the southern
boundaries for the suburban communities of Warren and East
Detroit.
On the east, the Northeast Sector boundaries meet
those of Harper Woods and all of the Grosse
Pointe
communities except Grosse Pointe Shores.
Other than the Ford Freeway, which separates the southernmost
section from the rest of the Sector, the Sector's notable
landmarks are those just outside of it.
These are Eastland
to its northeast, the City Airport to its southeast, and
Chandler Park to its south.
There are six subsectors in the Northeast Sector.
They are
described in the order as follows:
Grant, Mt. Olivet,
Burbank, Conner, Denby, and Finney.
NORTHEAST SECTOR PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS

The Northeast Sector is primarily a residential district
comprised
predominantly
of
single-family
homes
built
relatively late in Detroit's development.
Sixty percent of
the homes were built between 1935 ad 1954.
There are a few
small multiple family uni ts in the area, as well as some
industrial uses providing about 6,000 jobs.
The large number of church-supported schools is a unique
feature of this Sector, in comparison to the rest of the City.
The proportion of school-age children attending private or
parochial schools amounts to more than twice that of the City
as a whole.
There is a need to keep in close touch with
changes in this public/non-public school relationship and
respond to shifting demand for public school facilities, when
required.

3/90

III-86

�•

Subaectara
1 inch • 3200 ft

=

0

½

~

NORTHEAST SECTOR

Burbank Subsector....
• .••..•. 306-11
Conner Subsector... • • • . ••.••..• 306-12
Denby Subsector......
• ••••.••• 306-13
Finney Subsector •.•...•••..•.•••..• 306-14
Grant Subsector..... . . .
. .••.• 306-9
Mt. Olivet Subsector ............•.• 306-10

�•.

.

.

I
I

ii

l;,g

;;

.., I

:i(
I

-

81

82
83
8"

86
RT
R2
R3
R4

R5
R6

RESTRICTED BUSINESS
LOCAL BUSINESSIRESIDDfTIAL
SHOPPING DISTRICT
GENERAL BUSINESS
GENERAL SER/ICES
S!NGLE-F AJIILY RESIDENTIAL
TWO-F .MIILY RESIDENTIAL
LON-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
THOROUGHF.ARE RESIDENT /AL
MEDIUM-DENSITY RES/DENTIN.
HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

SDI

GENE/tWZED

I resident/al. wiffl !fmltl!d Ct)f1VT'edal)

REZONING CONCEPT

SD2

UM/TED INOOSTRIAL
RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
INTENSNE INDUSTRIAL
SPECIAL INWSTRIAL

TM
WI

TRMSITIONN. INOOSTRIAL
WATERFRONT INOOSTR!AL

PR

?.ARKS and RECREATION

4

PUBUC WHARF

SPECIAL DEVELDPMENT
ICO'llflY!fdal. wit fl 1/mltl!d residential)

S04
Ml
M2
M3
M4
M5

SPECIAL DEVELDPMENT

PD

PROPOSED SPECIAL DEVELDPMEJfT
RNERFRONT MIX USE
PLMNED DEYELDPMENT

PC PUBUC CENTER
PCA RESTRICTED CENTRAL BUSINESS

NORTHEAST SECTOR

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER .!!LAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

The area is generally in sound condition and requires ongoing
' maintenance, rather than extensive redevelopment. Thus, the
major general planning objectives for this Sector are to
conserve and reinforce sound development and prevent light
from gaining a foothold in any part of the Sector.
POLICY 306-1:

Northeast Sector General Development

Recognize and vigorously promote close cooperation between
City agencies and business and community groups as an
essential resource in the preservation of housing and
neighborhoods. Work closely with local citizen groups to deal
with community problems in a speedy and efficient manner.
POLICY 306-2:

Northeast Sector - Land Use

Promote the best utilization of, and adequate control methods
for, the thoroughfare frontages. Establish interim open space
uses in cleared areas that are not immediately redevelopable.
Provide for adequate environmental protection from negative
impacts resulting from the operations at Detroit City Airport.
POLICY 306-3:

Northeast Sector - Residential Development

Strengthen sound residential neighborhoods.
Encourage the
closing of residential alleys.
Encourage self-help and
provide housing conservation assistance where needed.
POLICY 306-4:

Northeast Sector - Commercial Development

Reinforce healthy strip commercial development by promoting
the availability of business improvement and small business
loans at standard interest rates and terms, and insurance at
reasonable prices.
Work closely with local merchants,
retailers, business owners, and other respected groups to
improve commercial conditions.
Phase out obsolete strip
commercial frontage development.
POLICY 306-5:

Northeast Sector - Industrial Development

Support existing heal thy industries; allow for industrial
expansion as indicated; discourage expansion of abrasive
industries; and, provide buffering of adjacent residential
areas.

3/90

III-87

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES
POLICY 306-6:

NORTHEAST SECTOR

Northeast Sector - Transportation System -

Improve vehicular circulation. Improve public transportation
opportunities. Provide for adequate buffering and protection
from negative environmental impacts resulting from the
operation and possible expansion of Detroit City Airport.
POLICY 306-7:

Northeast Sector - Recreation System

Provide increased recreational opportunities.
POLICY 306-8:

Northeast Sector - Institutional System

Improve existing facilities for projected increased public
school enrollment.

3/90

III-88

�p
GRANT
•

EXIIIT1NCI 1311N RAI.
I.AND us

•

j :~~•••••!

.f:
IND

RL

•

:
:

•

1N..r".

IND

-~~==:~•#.' \
===;;;;;;~~=::::::==~==~ci·~
:-••0: 1I
I
. :1'. '1 i,

RL.

IND -:j- •

r

0

~ii
:
-i i :
1~~--~·-···,, 11L .:-······
QC
1

l R~...
\ : •y..:
:IN
1

T

I

.....

:
•

•
.: ~ _)'

:

~

i:=i: i

RLM - ~edicm ::we•i="/ R••i;enei.al

"':'

RM - ~ed.ia Ccr.si:-/ !t•ai.a:::!..al
RH - :!!.;~ i:ler..si:-1 baiter.":.:.al

RL

:
:··v·-:···'
.......

'

ae • ii!a:le!&amp;l

RL - :.CV Ctt.•it-f

''

! !:•••••••-: . . . ._,_.'.''
e

li•,I

: IND
IN • T

CC

SRC - S~ial R•sii!e::.eial-C=-==a:-i:i&amp;l

...

~~

INST - ::a:!:.""J.eicr.al
IND - Ge:i•ral Inc!l:Seia!
LT. INC .. ~T-\'!. t:-Au•~i~l

:I •• .:::--.

\\...:.-·}

01ST - Di11tri=Ucn I:d.:l.s~i.1.l

~•:er

MC cc=.r::i&amp;l
BC - S;,ecUl ca:ar..r:i&amp;l

\7~~= f

\ •,-:;,
••••',:-.":

RLC - .autant.ul./t.ocal c.=a:-:ial
QC - Greara.1 ecm::.r:ia!.
CC - ~ ! . a o n c:cce::ial
MUR - :11!!.xe t?ae Resica~~al

'•,••--•.:•c•-•••-: 1Na -T

~---!!~:::::,.: ./·!!
~

, ••

os--sp,oce

u,
0

....I

PORT- l'C~

CEM - C:naui=7

"'

1 UICf'I : 2000ft .

ocre•

0

=,.o

t/2

~

,----, =

0.0

.25

.50

. 75

1

"'''•

NORTHEAST SECTOR

GRANT
R • coMMIINC&amp;D
CIRN

• RAI.

FUTUR

I.AND

us •

•

✓

a:I L ... Lew i:ec.ait-/ bsid • !'l.::i&amp;.1.

RLM - Lcv-!'l11elica :rJi:y i\es!.:!eneiU

rND

·~

:,-/

/

a:IM .. !'!eCica D~i-=-! :\es:S.c!e~-:.i.al

RH • !!!.~ Ce~ir/ ~•aigei:_~.al
SRC - s;:ecta.1

a.• ~e::.c.i&amp;l-Ce:::a::eial

INST• :bs:.!.bU.or.&amp;l
INC - ~ a l lrlCUSc!.a.:
LT. INC - t.i.;!:.: t:A-.s.sc'i..1.l

01ST
MC
SC
RLC

...
...
-

Dis::i=.cic:~ I:.Cus-::::.~:
!'!ajc:- o=:r:a:::..a.l

S;:ecial Ccc:ta:::ial

i!.H~n~al/:.C,:al ~=-a:::~.1.l
GC - Gu..e:a.l &lt;===.ar::..1.:
CC - C::::::;,,ar:.son C=e:::.al

MUR -

0

u,

~!.,tr-

t:H !tHita:-;:i.al

OS - c;,.11 S?&amp;ee
!='ORT - ,~::-:.

....0I

CEM - C~e•:-!

f--'
0

REC - Rac:r..ation

1t:. .

1 lfleft :

2000 ,,.

NORTHEAST SECTOR

Grant Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306-9

III-88A

�•
'

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

GRANT SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Grant Subsector is bounded by Eight Mile Road on the
north, the Grand Trunk Western Railroad and Van Dyke on the
east, McNichols on the south, and Mt. Elliott on the west.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, GRANT SUBSECTOR

Some spot clearance of blighted residential and commercial
structures will be needed. Relocation of residents from areas
surrounded by industrial uses is desirable, e.g., on Filer.
As long as the housing is viable and in good use, buffer zones
between industry and residential should be constructed and
maintained wherever possible.
GRANT SUBSECTOR GOALS

The area is generally comprised of sound and stable singlefamily neighborhoods, a strong industrial corridor on the
west, several fairly strong commercial strips such as Van
Dyke, Seven Mile Road, Eight Mile Road, and the new Bel-Air
shopping center. All these elements should be supported and
continue to be strong . in the future.
Possible conflicts
between the residential and industrial uses should be handled
through buffering and traffic circulation techniques, and any
negative impacts resulting from the possible lengthening of
runways and consequent expansion of operations at City Airport
should be addressed.
POLICY 306-9:

Grant Subsector Policies

Continue residential uses in most of the residential areas.
With the cooperation of community groups,
explore the
possibility
of
establishing
a
neighborhood
self-help
maintenance improvement program.
For
the purpose of
maintaining housing at its current high level, code inspection
and enforcement in critical situations should be encouraged
along with rehabilitation loans and grants and possible
selected spot clearance of those structures that are not
economically rehabilitable. This can be accomplished provided
that funds from either private or public sources are
available.
In the interim, encourage residents to continue to maintain
and improve their property. Provide buffering from adjacent
residential by industrial uses.
Encourage the closing of
3/90

III-89

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

residential alleys along with the establishment of curb-side
, garbage pick-up where possible.
In the two small residential areas abuttting the railroad
south of 7 Mile Road and north of McNichols,
maintain full
City services. Encourage owners_to maintain and improve their
property.
When opportunities present themselves, encourage
the relocation of residents, thereby making the area available
for industrial expansion, which is a more appropriate longterm use. Relocation should take place in a thoughtful, fair,
equitable manner so that residents are not unduly penalized.
Continue existing uses on public school and major recreation
facility
sites.
Encourage year-round
use
of
school
playgrounds to help serve the recreational needs of the
community.
Continue existing uses on major institutional sites. Explore
the possibility of the Evangelical Lutheran Institute for the
Deaf's athletic field being shared with the Detroit Department
of Recreation to help serve the recreational needs of the
community.
Continue shopping center at East Outer Drive and Sherwood.
Continue strip commercial uses long Van Dyke and Eight Mile.
Encourage owners to continue to maintain and improve their
property.
Provide buffering from adjacent residential and
off-street parking where
required by commercial uses.
Encourage compatible development, including residential, on
vacant parcels.
Maintain sound commercial uses on Seven Mile Road commercial
strip. Upgrade area as opportunity arises to a thoroughfare
residential-commercial strip; that is, apartment development
with supporting neighborhood commercial uses.
Encourage
thoroughfare residential-commercial strip development on
vacant parcels.
In the interim, enforce the City's litter
ordinance to keep weeds and debris from accumulating on vacant
parcels.
Provide buffering from adjacent residential and
commercial by industrial uses.
Alleviate congestion along
Seven Mile through strategies that might include parking
restrictions and/or widening of selected intersections.
Continue use of industrial areas as industrial districts.
Maintain full City services.
Insure adequate buffering
between industry and adjoining residential areas.

3/90

III-90

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

Support Bel-Air Shopping Center through the provision of City
• services, traffic system accommodations, etc.
For the parcel at Nevada and Sherwood, encourage the
development of light industrial uses properly screened and
buffered from adjacent residential uses.
For the site adjacent to Holy Cross
development of new residential units
Development should be in character
density as, the existing residential
this site.

3/90

Hospital, encourage the
on this parcel of land.
with, and at a similar
development adjacent to

III-91

�•

IND - Ge:te=al Indast:!.al

MT. OLIVET

• XlaTING

G• N
LANCI U ••

• RAL

RL - :.c:-~ =•!!2ie"'/ R.a•idenci&amp;l.
RLM - ~Kia11 :er.ai~y tlea!.~•nt.!.A:

RM - !'!r-!.::,. :er.• i:y IIAsiC.:o.ciai
RH - a!.;:. ~•~iey Rauc!enc:.al
SRC - S:;:•:!.al aeaidential-Cc=a:c!.•l
INST - --r • ..... lO""al

LT. IND - :.!;~'! ::::Un-~l
Cl T • Di•:..:!.'.=uti0a I::c:.at:!..a!

•

MC - :-!&amp;!:: -:==arc!al
SC - s;,e:!al Cc:c:ae::!.al
RLC - i\esi~e:-.ti&amp;l/Loc:al C:::::.:.:!.al
QC - C..:•=•!. c.:::=iar-...ia!.
CC - c=;a::.son c::=:a_-:ial

~
fb~th

ac,.•

0.0

POAT - 10~

Cl!M - ::.:.:•:--/

REC .. Rac:.a~!.on

Ci
ClJ

1 inch a 2000 ft.

,------, =

.lS

,SO

.71

LT, INC - t..!.;!".s: ::-.i:!-.lat:ia.l

LI

•

RaCCMM NCl• CI
l"UTUR•
G • N • RAL LAND UII•
RL - Lev : • csity Rea.1d.ne1al
RLM - Lcv~ed.it:11 Cenaity Reai~•nci&amp;.l
RM - ~•c!!.:.:::t :&gt;er-..ai~ Reaidencial
RH - P.:!.;!:. te:tSity Ra • id• n.cial
SRC - 3?• ::.al R• aidantial-coaca:c:.al

SC
ALC
GC
CC

-

s9 • ::.al ca:•uc:i&amp;l
ae.siC.•n~al./Loca1 Com:=erc:ia.l
G•r.a.::&amp;!. c.=-.r:ial
cco;,a:;.scn ca=a::i.-.!.
C• !Mt.a:--!

ClJ

~rth

ilcres

~=

11

0

0 .0

CEM -

1

,----, =

.25

.,o

.,,

t.0

mile

REC • 1tac-:• a~:.on

NORTHEAST SECTOR

INST - •...s ......... c ••al

Olive: Subsec::o:- ..

, 1nct1 a2ooot1.

CIST - Ois'!::-:.:Uti:a. tl:t!u• u:.al

MC - ~ajc: C:::mard.a.l

mue

NORTHEAST SECTOR

INC - Gena:al In=:9t:!al

MT. OLIVET

1.0

...... 306-10

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

MT. OLIVET SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Mt. Olivet Subsector is bounded by Eight Mile Road on the
north, Gratiot on the east, McNichols on the south, and Van
Dyke and the Grand Trunk and Western Railroad on the west.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, MT. OLIVET SUBSECTOR

Some spot clearance of blighted residential and commercial
structures will be needed.
Additional outdoor recreation
facilities should be provided when the opportunities arise.
MT. OLIVET SUBSECTOR GOALS

This subsector should continue to feature sound residential
areas with strengthened commercial strips and a revitalized
Gratiot-Seven Mile Road shopping district.
The emphasis
should be on conservation of the current housing stock with
programs being used to assist older persons, who make up a
relatively high percentage of head of households,
in
maintaining their homes.
POLICY 306-10:

Mt. Olivet Subsector Policies

Continue residential uses in all existing residential areas.
With the cooperation of community groups, explore the
possibility
of
establishing
a
neighborhood
self-help
maintenance
improvement program.
For
the purpose of
maintaining housing at its current high level, code inspection
and enforcement in critical situations should be encouraged
along with rehabilitation loans and grants, and possible
selected spot clearance of those structures that are not
economically rehabilitable. This can be accomplished provided
that funds from either private or public sources are
available.
In the interim, encourage residents to continue to maintain
and improve their property.
Encourage the closing of
residential alleys along with the establishment of curb-side
pick-up,
where possible.
Explore the possibility of
instituting parking restrictions on residential streets
adjacent to the Seven Mile-Gratiot shopping district in order
to minimize negative effects on residents. Adequate amounts
of parking within the Seven Mile-Gratiot district will need
to be available.
Continue
facility
3/90

existing
sites.

uses on public school and
Encourage
year-round
use

recreation
of
school
III-92

�•
I

I

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

playgrounds to help serve the recreational needs of the
' community. Continue existing uses on major institution sites.
Continue strip commercial uses on Eight Mile Road and on
Gratiot. Encourage owners to continue to maintain and improve
their property. Provide buffering from adjacent residential
and off-street parking where r-equired by commercial uses.
Encourage compatible development, including residential, on
vacant parcels.
Maintain sound commercial uses on McNichols and Seven Mile
Road.
Upgrade areas as opportunities arise to thoroughfare
residential-commercial strips; that is, apartment development
with supporting neighborhood commercial uses.
Encourage
thoroughfare residential-commercial strip development on
vacant parcels.
In the interim, enforce City's litter
ordinance to keep weeds and debris from accumulating on vacant
lots.
Explore the possibility of providing more off-street
parking in order to alleviate congestion.
Support efforts to develop an enhanced shopping district in
the Gratiot-Seven Mile Road area.
Encourage owners to
continue to maintain and improve their property.
Continue
publicly funded improvements, including landscaping, building
rehabilitation, and parking lot improvements. Discourage the
establishment of additional fast-food operations and autorelated uses.
Continue use of industrial areas as industrial districts.
Maintain full City services.
Insure adequate buffering
between industry and adjoining residential areas.

3/90

III-93

�•
BURBANK

.:·:· · · ':~. . . . . .:

• Xl8TINQ

I
/f

...

.- .

, .•••

. .-7 ..

AL - !.cv ::'.e!"...11::-: Re • idant!.al
RLM - ~ediaa :er:ai:.·t ~••i=enUal
RM - ,i~!.::::a Der.J1i:Y '-••~e:,.c:.al
RH - P.:!.;:t Cc.• iC-/ R.ee.J.Car.c:.al
SAC • 3;:•:ial .A•uc!e:icial-Ce::1ea:-cisl
INST - :::.a:.!.t-:1:!..:::-.al
INCi - G.-..aral I::.Cuau:.d
LT. IN0 .. I.!;!:::. !!".C-..:a~u.l
DIST • t,!.1~!!:ucic~ :tr.Ci.:st::i.al

!

✓,.• .:

,i

AL

ij

, •••••••

RL

1i! l l

L

?/

r-· !

:i

.....
/ :
Z.
,a.:
:

I

:

:

MC - lla1o:: C=r::Nr:ial
9C - s;:.:i.al c.:::mer::.al
RLC - l••~en~al/t.cc:al c:=.rc:ia.l
GC - G«:.e=al c:=ar::.al
CC: - cc=;u:.1=n C:C:.:.::ial
MUR - !"!:!Jew! Ole :'.e1:..~•~:ial
09 - ~:-:. Sr,a:•
PCRT- ?o~

~---~i·~1,,,.:--..:.-~
--=--~~-. ..

•••••••••••••••

--,.~-'.·.··.·.·::··~·~~-·~~--··-·······..········~..,;1:.:f•-··..•..•--i~..

,..! ...

~'i. ............ :

:g:

/

\ ~&lt;JO-;s .

....:

•

•

_I;:
1"
.-,;.;;.;::
.....

•

AL

/ -

••

/ &lt;:::
~

/ /
/ /

ALM

.

\NST,','

AL

OSI

I/

•• /

:a i.

:o:

30---------=

'

•C~•~ S?•c••t:i.1:.:.:.·.!::.0nal

t

/

....
: : .. : /

;•--·

c• :a:.•~!

REC • a.c::.ac:.on

.,

..L

i :

' ./ ...

Cl!M -

-~ -~,1•

IIIL

~ - ---==--- - - --

/ .....

/

I
RL

• • RAL

Cl N
LAND US•

,1

-

1NIClll2000II.

-

. -· ~"':" ~ ~~ _J~~ r-~.:-::~ .ar~~_;;;~. .,
i

11
~

0

0.0

!/ ~
~

.so

.25

= ....

1

.75

,.o

c=..=:F==t:::::::F=-'
I

' •
\ .__//

"'' L--,----------------------.---'---------'

lu-

NORTHEAST SECTOR

BURBANK

.
#

..~············~······=

••• !

/

:

:

I

--cac i

.. L

::-.i'.NaT
AL

::

:

:

:

RL

1

•OBI:

C:

I

:

~i l l
i : :

C

•

. . . . .•

;CC
• •••• '

.......

!I
'J:

I

',11 LS

•

-""':~···················7 :·····~~\ .
·! i
..,

:-r"u:
....
ALM:.:
. ..
./ .

Q~/

RLM'
RM
RH
SRC
INST
IND
LT. INC
OIIIT

...
•
-

•
MC •

SC RLC -

~ i e 1 :er:.si:y ltas.i:!•nt.ial
:,.,..ai::t ;1.esi.c.e:.-:!.al

,ied!,:;=.

!!!.;~ Ce:tai:y lt••i~a:-,.c!al
S;i,ecia.l l• • ide:u:,!.al-Ce=::a:'Cial
::Uc!t"J.ti:::.al
Ge:e:al I~uat.::.&amp;!..
U:;::.:. I:-.rhsi:.:!.3!
Di.s:..:~:.icn I::.~u•:=:.a l
~•!c:: C=:a:c!.sl
S;,.c::.al C=-me::!..d
l.ea~r.:!.a!./"'...cea! :=irc:ial

GC .. C..r.e:-&amp;l ~=-:-::.:..!..:

CC - cc-;:c · s-•

GC
1:
:
••••••-••••

1•:.:· ~ ;

RaCCMM • NCl• CI
PUTUR •
GIIN&amp;RAL L.ANC US&amp;
RL • Lev ;:e~it:-f ResiCa:i:!.al

i

I
I

:

.;:-

QC

L.

,-

RL

c--•-R• sl.

MUR - ~:.XV- t:se l•s:.:.•:-.:...:.s!
OS - ~::. S;:a-::e
PORT - ?0:--:.

CEM - ce:e:. • :"'f

REC • a.c:eac:.on
OSI

·o;,.:s Sp•c:••!:-:.st.:.:..-.:::.0n•l

i-••--,•····-·
, ...~•

T

'

=f:.'=1= =

ac ✓,/

!.:' ::

I :'
RL

RL

INaT,,•• • ./ •·
Q

:•:

!••{ _/

tno,tt,

Q

1 ;nch •100011.

uJ

--···~
I. ___..,.
--. ·:s"'
:'" -. ~.•
'-1,...,:_..,.
_____
,...,,,....,...,c..,.~~-,»1;r..,s=:af~..,.
..
: _.'
RLC

. •

~ . • • : ,••• /

KNII

0 .0

.l5

.!O

. 75

1.0

c::::::::::::ic::=ii = ;c==::i

kUometer

NORTHEAST SECTOR
Burbank Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306-11

IE-93A

�•
!

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

BURBANK SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The boundaries of the Burbank Sector are Eight Mile Road on
the north, Kelly on the east, Houston-Whittier on the south,
and Gratiot on the west.
To its northeast is the Eastland
Shopping Center.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, BURBANK SUBSECTOR

Some spot clearance of blighted residential and commercial
structures will be needed.
Obsolete strip commercial
structures along Gratiot should be cleared.
BURBANK SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Burbank Subsector should continue to contain sound, stable
residential areas through the use of housing conservation
techniques.
The strong-commercial strips on Gratiot, Eight
Mile Road, and Seven Mile Road should remain so. The GratiotSeven Mile Road shopping district should be revitalized and
the issues relating to the Houston-Whittier/Kelley/Hayes
commercial area should be addressed resulting in a resurgence
of that area.
POLICY 306-11:

Burbank Subsector policies.

Continue the existing residential development.
With the
cooperation of the community groups, explore the possibility
of
establishing
a
neighborhood
self-help
maintenance
improvement program.
For the purpose of maintaining this
housing at its current high level code inspection and
enforcement in critical situations should be encouraged along
with rehabilitation loans and grants and possible selected
spot clearance of those structures that are not economically
rehabilitable. This can be accomplished provided that funds
from either private or public sources are available.
In the interim, encourage residents to continue to maintain
and improve their property.
Encourage the closing of
residential alleys along with the establishment of curb-side
garbage pick-up, where possible.
Explore the possibility of instituting parking restrictions
on residential streets immediately west of Kelly in order to
minimize negative effects from commercial activities on the
east side of Kelly Road.

3/90

III-94

�.
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

Continue existing uses on public school and recreation
' facility
sites.
Encourage
year-round
use
of
school
playgrounds to help serve the recreational needs of the
community.
Continue existing uses on major -institutional sites.
Continue strip commercial uses on portions of Seven Mile Road,
Eight Mile Road, Moross, and Gratiot.
Encourage owners to
continue to maintain and improve their property.
Provide
buffering from adjacent residential where required. Encourage
compatible development on vacant parcels.
Support efforts to develop an enhanced shopping district in
the Gratiot-Seven Mile Road area.
Encourage owners to
continue to maintain and improve their property.
Continue
publicly funded improvements. including landscaping, building
rehabilitation, and parking lot improvements. Discourage the
establishment of additional fast-food operations and autorelated uses.
Continue shopping district use in the Kelly Road/HoustonWhi ttler /Hayes area. Encourage owners to continue to maintain
and improve their structures. Alleviate congestion at Kelly
Road/Houston-Whittier/Hayes intersections through strategies
that might include turning lanes, parking restrictions, and/or
widening of the intersections.

3/90

III-95

�•

~=============:...__ _ _

__:_~~-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=-----

~

t~...
f-• •• :
A
··•••• oc:1
•••

====-=.::.::c__c___
N-::N-::E-=R-=-=-=-=-=-=~

rl

• XlaTING

,,_./

LANCI

Gl• N • RAI.

ua•

••• •••=:-::-.~~
.•.~ . o ~ c~~
•,1c"-'1c:•..,c 1_!:

:/
;:

/

c···········•{i,;··~.':........,
\•••:L:aC/
\ ,. _ ,,;/'
-r

___ j____ • • • • • • • •

\

~

RL

//

::j/

\:

RL

\

/

.. ::"\

11'

.,.;,·
\
~

I

,

.,-o{•• ••
# ••

,:&lt;:~:........::.~ ""••,'. ,i

....···(..::..

•'O~

•••·

··········: : .

•••••

AL

••,·•••:~~

~:=~--.:
:
:
\

RLM

!

:
:

\ :~
1

.i

:
:

, Q~

\O:
!
!
\

: AM

: ., :
.....

/ ;. :

: =7~ --:: --=--=- b---====-/"
&gt;-- : "M
:
1111ST
•
'&gt;,.,.

'

!

i =~•'f.~

AL

.••-----IN • T .

\J'

~

••••

·•••

,,t.( ••••••
,•••

7N8T ~•••

: ••••

:lcac ~//
I

'

AL

I

I

=-•••!

'"'•~ ...:
:

i":=.I

\

r··•·
!
•
tl'lif

I

T

;
J

Cl

;

...---~••,• \
~..~,........
~•~..!.:~:••••••••\

o

j

:

\
~)ta.
..............................!

I

:""··:'.I
•••• • •t
••l f

I

/ · ·\
. ~~.

•••y~ : :

= :: = /;-

I

•

.

-- -J

!

Q

1

:

,• : ·

_;

: : ;'

ac
:
:. /
-~~7&amp;_:,_.;,:;:~../••••••~
! CIC/
I EDS;:L ·~.:-'-:,("'&gt;~-~··~········.;
/
~ 0 ~ ·:;~. ~~:f-l ..
C

I

I

°'L
: -- :-••,:

RL

I

·;

llll • T :.; ,
\_.:,•

•

•

~::t·~-·-~;.-~,,atr~~j'
~=;:::-:~

~

&amp;~..

1 indl 12000ft.

u..J

0

0.0

I

J

.2,!.--:!,0

c::..::_i

.7S

1.0

mil •

c::::::::r==-,

NORTHEAST SECTOR

CONNER

REC - Rac:reaucn
OSI

- c ;:e:i s;:ac:e-::is:.:.:.~:. :.:n., i

I 1ndl a2ooo tt.

n
u..J
acre •

0

NORTHEAST SECTOR

Conner Subsector ... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. 306-12

III-95A

�.

i

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

CONNER SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Conner Subsector is bounded by McNichols and HoustonWhittier to the north, Hayes to the east, the Ford Freeway to
the south, and Conner to the west. To its west is the Detroit
City Airport, and on its south. across the Ford Freeway is
Chandler Park.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, CONNER SUBSECTOR

The Conner Subsector is different eneugh so that programs and
policies recommended in the other subsectors may not be
appropriate here.
While there are economic difficulties in
the subsector at the present time, there are also many
strengths.
This subsector is very stable with respect to
population change and has many young families with children.
It is upon these strengths that the future of the subsector
will be planned.
Spot clearance of blighted and non-rehabilitable residential
and commercial structures, including obsolete strip commercial
buildings along McNichols, will be required.
The Harper
frontage must be studied for the best long-range future use.
When opportunities occur, additional outdoor recreation
facilities should be provided.
CONNER SUBSECTOR GOALS

This subsector, though containing many sound residential
areas, shows signs of some deterioration of its housing stock
in some areas.
Declines in housing conditions should be
arrested and reversed with rehabilitation and nuisance
abatement programs being stressed. Gratiot should remain the
most important commercial strip, while the McNichols nd Conner
commercial strips, which are less strong, should take on more
of the character of Chalmers, a mixture of low-rise apartment
buildings and neighborhood commercial. The Harper commercial
strip should be more actively redirected toward thoroughfare
residential
commercial
or,
on
the
south
side,
light
industrial.
POLICY 306-12:

Conner Subsector policies

In most residential areas, continue the residential land use.
With the cooperation of community groups,
explore the
possibility
of
establishing
a
neighborhood
self-help
maintenance improvement program.
In order to upgrade
residential development in this subsector, code inspection
3/90

III-96

�•
THE DE:fROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

and enforcement in critical situations should be encouraged,
• along with rehabilitation loans and grants and possible
selected spot clearance of those structures that are not
uneconomically rehabilitable.
This can be accomplished
provided that funds from either private or public sources are
available.
In the interim, encourage residents to continue to maintain
and improve their property. A close working relationship with
law enforcement agencies must be established in order to end
possible arson in the area near McNichols and Gratiot.
Encourage the closing of residential alleys along with the
establishment of curb-side garbage pick-up, where possible.
Explore the possibility of instituting parking restrictions
on residential streets adjacent to the Gratiot Avenue business
frontage in order to minimize negative effects on residents.
In the residential area just east of Conner between E. Outer
Drive and Harper,
within funding
limits,
explore the
possibility of establishing a conservation project along with
rehabilitation loans and grants and a code enforcement
program.
It should be recognized that substantial spot
clearance of those structures that are not economically
rehabili table will be necessary in this area.
Enforce the
City's litter ordinance and encourage residents to maintain
and improve their property.
Encourage the closing of
residential alleys along with the establishment of curbside
garbage pick-up, where possible.
Continue existing uses on public school sites.
year-round use of school playgrounds to help
recreational needs of the community.

Encourage
serve the

Continue existing uses on major institution sites.
Explore
the possibility of St. Juliana's playground being shared with
the Detroit Department of Recreation to help serve the
recreational needs of the community.
Continue general strip commercial uses on Gratiot and on
Conner.
Encourage owners to maintain and improve their
property.
Provide buffering from adjacent residential and
off-street parking where required by commercial
uses.
Encourage new uses to reoccupy vacant structures. Encourage
compatible development, including residential, on vacant
parcels. In the interim, enforce the City's litter ordinance
to keep weeds and debris from accumulating on vacant lots.

3/90

III-97

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICJES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

Chalmers is a good example of the proper development of a
• thoroughfare residential/commercial district.
Continued
development
and maintenance of
these
uses
should
be
encouraged.
Additional general commercial uses should be
discouraged; however, existing uses should be allowed to
remain, and maintenance and improvements to these uses should
be encouraged. Encourage compatible uses in vacant structures
that are acceptable to both the business community and
residents.
Maintain sound commercial uses along McNichols. Upgrade area
as opportunity arises to a thoroughfare residential-commercial
strip,
that
is,
apartment development with supporting
neighborhood
commercial
uses.
Encourage
thoroughfare
residential-commercial strip development on vacant parcels.
Explore the possibility of providing more off-street parking
in order to alleviate congestion.
A detailed study should be initiated to determine the best
long-term use of Harper. Possible uses that should be studied
include continued use of Harper as a general commercial strip,
and/or upgrading the area to a thoroughfare residentialcommercial strip,
that
is,
apartment development with
supporting neighborhood commercial uses.
Light industrial
uses should not be overlooked, especially between Harper and
the freeway since it is more isolated.
The study should
address the possibility of locating small neighborhood
shopping centers on the vacant parcels located between Harper
and the
freeway.
Facade and architectural
treatment
recommendations pertaining to existing sound commercial uses
should be included in this study.
While the study is in progress, maintain sound uses.
Encourage owners to maintain and improve their property.
Upgrade area as opportunity arises to uses compatible with
the results of the proposed study.
In the interim, enforce
the City's litter ordinance to keep weeds and debris from
accumulating on vacant lots.

3/90

III-98

�.
•

CENBV
• XlaTING

GaN

• RAL.

L.AND U -

RL - ~ ;;;::ecait:y Residan-c:.al
RLM - Lcv-!4edil::a Cenait".I a.eai:!aa.::.&amp;1.
RM - .!'!edic:a Deiuity Itea~-ci~
RH - B!.;~ D•!"..tit-/ R•• iCm-c!.al
SRC - Sjleeial R• • ida:"1.ti&amp;l.Ce==-:c:.al.

INST
INC
LT. INC
DIST
MC

•

tn.c.!t-;:tional
Ge:i.• ral Induac.:ial

U;h.t I.::c.u• c:ial
Di.9:.r~t.icn I:-..Cu • ~:..1.l
)l&amp;jcr C==-rcial

ac - s;:ecial c.acm:a::ial
ALC - Re • ic!ent.ial./Lccal C:=.e::ial

QC - Gece:ral c:.::=.r--i.a.l
CC - co=;iar!. • oc c:=e::ial
MUR - ~ix!V- 'CH :t• ai:!.e:,,,:.!.al
CS - 0pe.-,,

S~•=•

PCRT - i'o~
Cl!M - c:e:a:•:-/

REC • Jtacread.on
OSI

·o;::• :t si:•ce-I:uu:~:.ion&amp;l

0

o.o

2S

SO

,---.

.7S

1.0

.....

~

NORTHEAST SECTOR

CENBV
R • CDMM • ND• D
Q&amp;N

• RAL.

FUTUR •

L.AND US&amp;

RL - Lev Cetuiity Jtesit!• :i.:!al

RLM - ~•c:H,1.:111 Ce:iai:.7 ile • !.:!• n':ial
RM - .!'!ed.!.:.::: :er.. ie&gt;/ h • .ic9::::::..a.&amp;.
RM .. e!;~ ?:•~ii:"/ Jta • il!u::!al
SRC - Special Ru1idr.1ei.al-c===e::ial
INIIT - !:u:!t.~:icnal
INC - Ge:,eral I:,,c!u• cial
LT. INC - t.!.;~: ::-~• c.:bl
01ST - Dh'!.:-!~t.ian I.r.(!ua~.:.al
MC • ~ajc::- C:=:r:.rci&amp;l
SC - S~c:ial C:oaaaarcial
ALC .. l'.u ic!er.-:.!.al/I.ocal ===-::i&amp;l
GC .. G•r.e:al C..:ZC.r::.al
CC - ca:;,ar:.son c=:=.~::.3.l
MUR .. "-:!...x~ t·se ~••:.c!er.t:..t.l
OS - Oil•~ S;:a:e
PORT .. i'o::.
Cl!M .. Ce:ta'!e:-1

REC• Racreaticn
OSI

- ere!\ S~•ce-t:ist:.:.c.:.ion•l

I inc" : 2000 rt

,cre1

0
0 .0

25

so

r---"'

=

.75

1.0

NORTHEAST SECTOR

Denby Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306-13

III-98.A

�.
I

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

DENBY SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Denby Subsector is bounded to the north and the east by
Kelly Road and the City limits, to the west by Hayes, and on
the south by the Ford Freeway.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, DENBY SUBSECTOR

The Denby Subsector had a 1980 population of 21,158, compared
to its 1970 population of 25,045, a population loss of 13
percent during this period.
This is very close to the
Northeast Sector decline of 12 percent.
There are relatively fewer children in the Denby Subsector
than in any other subsector in the Northeast Sector.
Moreover, the Denby Subsector has the highest proportion of
senior citizen heads of household than any other subsector in
the City.
Thirty-three percent of the households in Denby
have a head at least 65 years of age, compared to 28 and 21
percent for the Northeast Sector and the City a
whole,
respectively.
Data on social characteristics and economic conditions in the
Denby Subsector indicate that it is about the best of the
subsectors in the Northeast Sector, and thus is substantially
better off than in the City as a whole.
DENBY SUBSECTOR GOALS

The residential areas within the Denby Subsector should
continue to be generally sound and stable. These areas should
be the focus of housing conservation programs to aid senior
owners to maintain their property at their current level. The
Morang/Cadieux
and
Whittier
thoroughfare
residential
commercial strips should continue to be strong while
maintaining their neighborhood character.
POLICY 306-13:

Denby Subsector Policies

In all residential areas, as needed and within funding limits,
explore the possibility of establishing a neighborhood selfhelp maintenance improvement program.
For the purpose of
maintaining this housing at its current high level, code
inspection and enforcement in critical situations should be
encouraged along with rehabilitation loans and grants and
possible selected spot clearance of those structures that are
not economically rehabili table.
This can be accomplished
3/90

III-99

�.
i

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

provided that funds from either private or public sources are
, available.
In the interim, encourage residents to continue to maintain
and improve their property.
Encourage the closing of
residential alleys along with the establishment of curb-side
garbage pick-up, where possible.
Continue existing uses of public school and major recreation
facility
sites.
Encourage year-round
use
of
school
playgrounds to help serve recreational needs of the community.
Continue existing uses on major institution sites.
Along
Kelly, continue commercial use. Encourage owners to continue
to maintain and improve their structures.
Alleviate
congestion at Kelly Road/Houston-Whittier intersection through
strategies
that
might
include
turning
lanes,
parking
restrictions, and/or a widening of the intersection.
Along Harper, maintain sound general commercial uses. Upgrade
area as opportunity arises. Encourage compatible development
on vacant lots.
In the interim, enforce the City's litter
ordinance to keep weeds and debris from accumulating on vacant
lots.
Morang/Cadieux and Whittier are excellent examples of the
proper development of thoroughfare residential-commercial
districts.
Continued development and maintenance of these
uses should be encouraged. Additional general commercial uses
should be discouraged; however, existing uses should be
allowed to remain and maintenance and improvements to these
uses encouraged.
Explore the possibility of providing more
off-street parking in order to alleviate congestion.

3/90

III-100

�•

I

;/

,,'I
...

!/
I

INC • Ge:,e:al I:xhlscr!.al

FINNEY

aXlaTING
LANCI

RL
RLM
RM
RM
SRC

•
...
•
-

a • N • RAL

•

UB

• icanc!al
~ . : l i c a Cea • i1:7 ite • i~•nti•l

!.cv C•:-:.•if:"f b

~et!!.aii .Du.aiey J.•a1'ie:-:.-:.!.al

~i;~ Cena.icy b

• ic!a::.c!al

S;:eebl Jteaidenc:lal-c=a:eial

01ST
MC
SC
RLC
QC

...
•
-

Ciat:!.=\:ticn Ir.O: • e!.a!.
.!'!&amp;jc: c:::=z.:ccial

L1
u.J

1 inch ,2ooott.

g~.

S;: • ei•l C::caar::!.al
ite1it!ent.!.&amp;1/toc:al C==e:-Cal

~r.•:al c=::.r:i&amp;!.
CC - Cc::r;;a:!.s::m C:::m:te:::!.al

ICl'ff

0

= =,.o
i=::::r==t::::::::F==:i
12

r=====7

o.o

PORT - .»or:

CEM - ca-_ata:-1

.so

.25

.7'

1

mile

lcJ-r

REC•
OSI

INST - ::ut!.':.~t.ional

%\

LT. INC - t.!;~:. I:'".du11t.:ial

bc:: • ati.on

• C;:e:, S~•c••!:'l. • Uc-.i::..oMl

NORTHEAST SECTOR

r···:

: ••7:'':f•c.,..,,va.,.

...

FINNEY
R • CCMM • NC• CI
PUTURII
GaN• RAL LANCI UB•
RL
RLM
RM
RH
SRC
INST

- t.ov

-

c• c.11ity ae • id • ncial

1.cv-!i!:• c!i~ : • n • ity

a••

ic!• ntial

INC - Ga:i•:-&amp;.l Icc!uscial
LT. INC - t.i;:::.s: ::-Au.st.=ial
CIST - Ois:.:i=-.:t.icn Inc!un.rial
MC - ~•jc:- C-=-ercial
SC • S;,.cial C=-er:ial
RLC - ilui:!•r.'!ial/Lacal. C===-:C:.al
G:C ... G.lr:.•:-s.:. C===ar:!al

CC - C~a:!s:,n c.:::=e:cial
CEM - Cn.a:.e::,,

~.C!.-:.::2 ,e:uiit7 Res.i.4-nt.J.al

?.!;:I c • :-.si.ey

R•

aic!.• nci.al

S?•cial it• sid• :i.cial-Cci:=e::ia.l

REC - Racr•at.:.on
OSI

- C;::e:1 S;=4ce- !::s:. :.:.u:.:.onal

::-.s:::.:·.::-::..c:-.al

Finnev Subsec+:or . .. ..

... . 30 f1-l

&lt;1

%\
g:,..

1 inch

1

2000

nu.J

tt.

acr'9•

0.0

,---, =

.25

,JO

.7S

t.0

NORTHEAST SECTOR
TTT-7

r. nu

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC.IES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

FINNEY SOBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Finney Subsector is bounded by the City limits to the east
and south, by the Ford Freeway to the north, and by Alter to
the west.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, FINNEY SUBSECTOR

The Finney Subsector, like the Northeast Sector as a whole,
is more stable and economically better off than other portions
of the City.
Also, both areas have a high proportion of
senior citizens and, correspondingly, a lower proportion of
families with children than the remainder of the City. There
will be a need for spot clearance of blighted residential and
commercial structures in this subsector.
FINNEY SOBSECTOR GOALS

Varying types of housing strategies should be used in order
to continue the strong residential areas covering a large part
of the subsector; improve the housing stock in areas which are
showing some signs of deterioration, and revitalize more
seriously declined areas through a combination of activities,
including spot clearance. Mack between Alter and Outer Drive
along with Warren should continue to service the area as
neighborhood commercial strips, while Mack east of Outer Drive
along with Harper should remain general commercial strips with
adequate buffering between them and nearby residential areas.
POLICY 306-14:

Finney Subsector Policies

Continue
existing
residential
development.
With
the
cooperation of community groups, explore the possibility of
establishing a neighborhood self-help maintenance improvement
program.
For the purpose of maintaining housing at its
current high level, code inspection and enforcement in
er i ti cal
situations
should
be
encouraged
along
with
rehabilitation loans and grants and possible selected spot
clearance of those structures that are not economically
rehabilitable. This can be accomplished provided that funds
from either private or public sources are available.
In the interim, encourage residents to continue to maintain
and improve their property.
Explore the possibility of
preserving examples of II immigrant II housing in order that
future generations will be able to see examples of that period
of City development.
Provide buffering between residential
3/90

III-101

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIQ:ES

NORTHEAST SECTOR

and adjoining commercial uses where required. Establish and
, enforce parking restrictions where needed to prevent the
utilization of residential streets for employees and/or
customer parking. Encourage the closing of residential alleys
along with the establishment of curb-side garbage pick-up,
where possible.
In residential area bounded by Mack, Alter, Warren, and
Barham,
within funding limits, explore the possibility of
establishing a conservation project along with rehabilitation
loans and grants and a code enforcement program.
It should
be recognized that substantial spot clearance of those
structures that are not economically rehabili table will be
necessary in this area. Enforce the City's litter ordinance
and encourage residents to maintain and improve their
property. Encourage the closing of residential alleys along
with the establishment of curb-side garbage pick-up, where
possible.
Continue existing uses on public school and major recreation
facility
sites.
Encourage year-round
use of
school
playgrounds to help serve the recreational needs of the
community. Continue existing uses on major institution sites.
Continue strip commercial uses on Harper and on Mack east of
Outer Drive.
Encourage owners to continue to maintain and
improve their structures.
Encourage compatible development
on vacant lots.
In the interim, enforce the City's litter
ordinance to keep weeds and debris from accumulating on vacant
lots. Encourage compatible uses in vacant structures that are
acceptable to both the business community and residents.
Provide buffering from adjacent residential and off-street
parking where required by the commercial uses.
Continue neighborhood commercial uses on Warren and Mack east
of Alter.
Encourage owners to continue to maintain and
improve their structures.
Encourage compatible development
on vacant lots.
If opportunities arise, provide off-street
parking for commercial uses.
However, in no cases shall
viable commercial structures and/or houses be cleared to
provide parking.
Enforce parking ordinances and review
metered time limits to provide more curb parking.
Support
activities of the business associations.

3/90

III-102

�.
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

ARTICLE 307
NORTHWEST SECTOR

The Northwest Sector of Detroit is bounded by Woodward Avenue
on the east, West Eight Mile Road on the north, and Southfield
Freeway on the west.
The southern boundary follows the
Highland Park city limits to the Pennsylvania Railroad, west
to Ardmore, south to Fullerton, and west to Southfield
Freeway.
The Northwest Sector is a very large area of the City of
Detroit which includes 20.1 square miles of the City's total
of 139. 61 square miles.
The population of this Sector was
approximately 200,000 in 1980, or roughly 17 percent of the
City's total population.
The residents of this Sector have significantly higher levels
of education and income than the Detroit median.
The Northwest Sector has been divided into six subsectors.
The subsectors are presented in the
following
order:
Greenfield, Pembroke and Bagley; Palmer Park; Cerveny and
Grandmont; Harmony Village; and, McNichols.
NORTHWEST SECTOR PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS
The Northwest Sector today has a great many advantages and
strong positive features.
It has, also, as does the rest of
the City, certain problems - aging structures, vacant land
and structures, obsolete commercial land commitments, an
industrial area weakened by recent economic conditions - the
solutions to which are major planning concerns.
Central to the future of the Northwest Sector are its
neighborhoods. Most of the Sector's housing stock is in
excellent condition and will continue to offer good quality,
wide variety and choice, and exceptional value for
the
housing investment dollar.
Some of the structures of older
vintage, particularly the frame structures, will require
special attention to prevent the deterioration of older
neighborhoods.
Selective
demolition
of
unrepairable
structures, rehabilitation of sound structures, and management
3/90

III-103

�•

SUBSECTORS

PEMBROKE
W OUTER

OR

' "'
BAGLEY
CURTIS

W OUTfA

c•

DA

CERVENY

•~o

"'"e"

I

I

HARMONY
VILLAGE

LYNDON

GRANDMONT
SCl-fOOLCAA,T

AA

1 Inch • sooo ft.

l.Lnorth

l'ULLfRTON

••

ICfN

0

1i2

1

r::=:::::::::::

c:::::::::::.,

0.0

11/2

2

i:::=:::::,

,_

mil"

0.5

t. 0
1.5 2.0
c::=,.--,_r::::::i
kllometero

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Cerveny-Grandmont Subsector •......• 307-9
Greenfield Subsector ............... 307-6
Harmony Village Subsector •...•••... 307-10
McNichols Subsector .•......•.•..••• 307-11
Palmer Park Subsector .••.....••.••. 307-8
Pembroke-Bagley Subsector •••••..... 307-7

�.
~

-z

I

•;

';

VI

i:r

0

zwl
rI

&gt;
i.J

--&lt;----;SION~3All ~

,- :::-

y

·-I

-

... - ,
I - ..

Pe•'

:::

-

iii

r-:z,

I I
I I

:::

- --- I I
I I
I I
I

-

- .,

VI
.:: - - _ J-

a:

:::l

u

L:.J

:,

Ii
~

L ~·

-

., /"

iii

i.J

,-----,
-- - ~ - -•

,,,, ., .,
,,,
,,,

I
I
I

:::

&gt;-

Ii

:::

a::

w
.....

al
al

r- -g-

'i
...
I Is~

·*- . .
-

I
I"'

li1
• -1:- - -

,:t;

•• liil~
1•

15

-

I
I

\!I I

,:
~

I I

....

I

VI
i.J

....er
I':: ....i.J...,

•J..M;j 073l;jH1nOS

81
82
83
IU
86
11

112
lt3

M
15

lt6

S/NGl£-FAIJILJ' RESIDENTIAL
7WCrF AIJILJ' RESIDENTIAL
LON·DENSTTY RESIDENTIAL
THOROUGHFARE RESIDENTIAL
IIEDIUII-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
HIGH-DENSTTY RESIDENTIAL

sm

GENBAUZED

RESTRICTED BlJSINESS
IJ)CAL BUS/NESS/RESIDENTIAL
SHOPPING DISTRICT"
GENERAL BlJSINESS
GENERAL SE/¼'ICES

REZONING CONCEPT

SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT

(resldentfal, wit/I lltnlf«I commercla/J

SD2 SPECIAL DEVELOPIIENT
&lt;conmerclal.wlfll Jltnlt«I res/dentla/J
504 PROPOSED SPECIAL DEVELOP/JENT

Ml
M2
M3
MC
M5

UMffED INDUSTRIAL
RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
INTENSNE INDUSTRIAL
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL

TM
WI

TRANSff/ONAL INDUSTRIAL
WATERFRONT INDUSTRJ.AL

I'll

PMKS and RECREATION

4l

PUBUC WHMF

RNERFRONT IIIX US£
PLANNED DEVELOPUENT
PC PUBUC CENTER
l'CA RESTRICTED CENTRAL BUSINESS

,o

NORTHWEST SECTOR

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

of vacant lots can help to insure the long-term viability of
• these residential areas.
Multiple-family structures in a number of the neighborhoods
currently produce a higher number of vacancies than the
single-family dwellings, and special attention to this problem
is warranted with emphasis on protection from intrusion,
reoccupancy, and removal of those units which are not
repairable.
The industrial corridor appears to be sound with good
accessibility to both rail and high access roadways. Parcels
appear regular and individual industrial sites are readily
accessible by minor roads leading into the industrial
districts.
Little, if any, industrial vacant land is
apparent, and although the corridor does not appear cramped,
expansion ability of some firms may be difficult.
Major educational facilities in the Northwest Sector include
Marygrove College, the University of Detroit, and Lewis
College of Business.
These institutions are important
regional facilities and should be given full cooperation and
support.

-

POLICY 307-1:

Northwest Sector - general policies

Maximize
the competitive position of Northwest Sector
industrial areas, institutional areas, major hospitals, and
universities, thereby reinforcing their potential as long-term
economic and employment centers.
Maximize the competitive
position of the Northwest Sector residential neighborhoods,
strengthening and protecting these areas as a housing resource
that is virtually unique in value.
POLICY 307-2:

Northwest Sector - land use

Plan for reuse of vacant land.
Remove blighting physical
conditions, including vacant structures.
POLICY 307-3:

Northwest Sector - residential development

While keeping single-family neighborhoods and encouraging
conservation and rehabilitation of older structures, develop
moderate- to high-density multiples on major and secondary
thoroughfares.
Improve the public infrastructure - streets,
sidewalks, curbs, lighting, etc. - and provide for adequate
maintenance. Improve landscaping; provide more street trees.
3/90

III-104

�.
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI,C.IES
POLICY 307-4:

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Northwest Sector - commercial development

Provide goods and services oriented to the heavy automobile
traffic along Woodward, Eight Mile, Grand River, Livernois,
and near freeway entries.
Give special support to the
comparison shopping areas of Livernois/Seven Mile and Grand
River/Greenfield and improve other areas, as appropriate, to
better maintain or phase-out commercial use.
POLICY 307-5: · Northwest Sector - transportation system

Develop Woodward light rail transit. Upgrade railroad grade
crossings. Fine-tune traffic patterns and movement; encourage
development of off-street parking in both commercial and
residential areas where the need exists. Especially, provide
additional parking for the shopping center at Livernois and
Seven Mile and for the Palmer Park apartment complex.

3/90

III-105

�• LD

CIREENFl

-----

a&gt;&lt;IIITINCI I.AND ..._

RL-,....ramoie,_,-...,.
RLM- ,_.., a.-e, ~
RM- -,..., oon..e, ~
RH- Bi-,, ramoie, _,-...,.
SRC-si-c.i_...,~
INST - tnot.i-.i-i
INO-&lt;lll--.linUttial
LJ: IND- Li.,,._ -.ai&amp;1

RL

TAC-

Thoroughfare ..,udant.ial•C~rcial

MC-lalcro-dAl

SC-"-1&amp;1RLC-~-

GC- &lt;lineal cc---

MUR-,..-,-~

MP...

''

.,

R

RL

ii

I

··---::
RC

~
1
g
,l

I . .. .
..-•... . .

• - · - • · - · - · : l:

r. : RL
:..INST :

RM

5J
-

RL

. .
..
.:RU.
..
.....

:
: INST

it-~1-•200011

INST

RL

Ma j or Park

RC- Racnat i cn
POS- ........,., - n Space
OSI - Open Space-Ins t 1tut i one l
V- Vacant
CEM-c..tary

RL

."ii

GC

~·

RLC

1'1
=----;;;.
..
.7S
,---,1.0

.25
.so
,......----,

0.0

NORTHWEST
SECTOR

8/83

GREENFIELD

&lt;:;

---·· ··-----

MILE

RL-u.,a.-e,~

ALM-,_.., ramoi,:y ~
RM--..-.. ~
RH- ..
SAC--..i~-....i
INST--.....IND--...i-.m&amp;1
LJ: IND-~ -.m&amp;1
TRC- ThOroUl)hfan Jlaeidential•C~cial
MC- ..,cra:.-rdal

GC

-.-tr~

RL

SC- __, -

ALC-~-

GC- - . i a-c&amp;1
cc---

Ge\...

MUR-,..-,u.,~
MP- JilaJor Park
RC- Racreation
POS- ........,., 0pon • OSI - Open Space-Inst i tutional
V• Vacant.
CEM--.,,

····------······
lGC
RL

RC

INST
Ot.'ffP

RL

i
.,___t

n•
...

DR

RL

:

C

g,

l

: AL

i

!

i

~

for ax,,laaat.10II of ca~~rlea

'

I

AA

INST

INST

GC

s..

----i---. i ,'.
:
:

l.Lnortft

RL

[1J

.....

~·

~i RLC

!I

.

0.0

8/83

Greenfield Subsector ••.•••••••••••• 307-6

Cl

1 inch • 2000 ft

.25

112

-=-==;:i..

.50

,---,

.75

1.0

c=:::,

NORTHWEST
SECTOR

III-lOSA

�r

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~IES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

GREENFIELD SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

Greenfield Subsector, bounded by Eight Mile Road, John C.
Lodge Freeway, McNichols Road, and Southfield Freeway, is
primarily a
low-density residential area.
Commercial
activities are located along major thoroughfares in ribbon
formation. Several major institutions are located within this
Subsector, the most notable being Sinai and Mt. Carmel Mercy
Hospitals on Outer Drive.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, GREENFIELD SUBSECTOR

Greenfield Subsector is an attractive, well-functioning
residential area.
Its attributes include excellent housing,
strong
community
groups,
well-maintained
neighborhoods
designed for our auto-oriented society, and major institutions
which reflect a positive image and respect for their
surrounding neighborhoods.
Only two weaknesses deserve
special attention. The first is the over-abundance
of commercial frontage and the resulting instability of the
Greenfield commercial districts.
The second is the lack of
recreational program facilities.
GREENFIELD SOBSECTOR GOALS

This is a basically sound, family-oriented community.
The
goal is simply to insure that the area remains sound, that
any indications of deterioration are reversed and that the
commercial areas become better organized, more attractive,
and more closely matched to the needs of the area's residents.
POLICY 307-6:

Greenfield Subsector policies

Policy recommendations for the Greenfield Subsector are
primarily reinforcement or strengthening of existing land use
activities and patterns.
A few address minor weaknesses,
strive to encourage the ideal pattern for this area, and
suggest some diversification.
Encourage continued high maintenance levels of residential
neighborhoods through community activities, insuring support
by local financial institutions and through joint reinvestment
programs.
Target housing conservation programs to areas
showing signs of decline and areas with a higher proportion
of frame structures. Where vacant lots are present, work with
block residents to determine desired use and the best method
for their maintenance.
3/90

III-106

�.
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI.CIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Encourage owners or property managers to maintain vacant
• structures at the same level as the remaining properties and
to participate in block activities such as snow removal and
yard maintenance projects. Work with owners and real estate
agents toward reoccupancy of the structures through joint
programs such as expanded vacant-homes rehabilitation projects
or a joint urban homesteading program.
Adjust allocation of commercial frontage space to current and
projected needs.
Encourage clustered convenience shopping nodes in close
relationship with the development of multi-family residential
districts.
Encourage
commercial
frontage
improvements,
providing
architectural and landscape treatment, adequate parking, and
blight removal.
Develop an indoor recreational program facility in proximity
to or within the Greenfield Subsector.
In addition, if the
opportunity avails itself, without requiring a loss of sound
housing, develop a neighborhood playground within the area
bounded by James Couzens, Seven Mile, and Greenfield. In the
meantime, encourage owners of under-utilized, privately owned
land which does not abut major thoroughfares to permit use of
their land as temporary play space; in such cases, consider
allowing the owners some level of tax credit.
Work closely with community groups to form Block Watch crime
prevention programs and to keep them active, and adopt other
programs as feasible to control crime.

3/90

III-107

�.
-=···---·-~·-

-;'!"'••·.~·1..-.-..-:.-~~;-~LE-..-...-."'!':.'--+.-..,."'!'.....
.- -. .-. .-. .-..-.-~-..'!!!9.'!!!9.-..

"""",F,5i;fl!G~C-:.·····
..-. .-..-••-••-..-..-..-...
-.-••-••-.·.--.••-. .""!.~-RM-""l!~-....
_J GC
:•--....
• ••_••.••••.•.... •.••~•
••••••••____

·

GC

LC
-••••••

: .._:
:...-.:-.LT IND

ilNST!

..

: RC

i

i

RL

~,

"~

RL

I....

INST+_j !INST/RC
W Outer

!~

RL 0
1
GC
GC

Or

RL
GC

~i
i
..............
~.~------~·"'
~,--...--:

i

!

0

i 1~--

:,
•

•

·--····
:··:.........;
.........
.............. RM •
..........
0

41 :1

RL

LC

RL :••••• INST

:.: 1.....

RL

:G
=---•--·c

~

I

or

SEE APPENDIX FOR EXPLANATION

MC- i.:,cr ~
SC-~~
RLC-~~
GC--.i~

PEMBROKE

----

RL---,ey~

RLM_,____'Y~
RM--.. - ' Y ~
RH---'Y--...,.
SRC-~ - - . . . , . ~
INST-1-1IND-a.-a.1u: IND- U,,tE -

POS• ..m.anent
OS I • Open
V•

0
0.0

Opan Spaee

.H

-~

.75

Space- Ins t i t 1,1,t.ion• l

··-

NORTH\1\/EST

*- Playfield

..........

RM

GC

8 MILE

~

&lt;

r

SECTOR

GC

:...... LT. IND

:INST:

a:

..,~

RL
RL

.,

INS

Outer

RL
GC

~

RL

j1NsT/RM
W

GC

:;

r·~-

!;l

,

......: ~--·-. ........
-

----iJRC i

n111----RL

1.0

-. .

c::::::::f=="L:'=='

Vacant

GC

8/83

JOOOfl .

CEM-c....ry

f ..........................

~~---i
··············•

lflCflj I

cc-~-

MUR-111-s-~
MP- Major P• rk
AC- ..creation

-~LAND ....

GC

1

LAND USE CATEGORIES

Dr

..
-···

RL

•

:·'Ill~~---··.:

C

SE£ APPENDIX FOR £XPLANAnON or LAND USE CATtGORtES

8/83
PEMBROKE

MC- ..,aro:-.c..i

sc-~-

GC---

RLC-

r•

w..- ••-n

&amp;.AN0I

RL-,_..,...,,~

1 •IICPI: 2000ft

-.-u.1/tDCal -

-

CC--o.arc,.,J.

u..

RLM- ,__,. ..,...,, ~
RM--..-.,,~
RH-111,n_.,,~

SRC-~-.-...i~
INST-1-1IND-_,_
U:IND-..__

MUR-.,.-,-~
MP- NA)or Park
RC- Aecreauon

POS- - •

-n

Space
OSI-Open Space•Inadtutional

0
0.0

.25

.50

V- Vacar:t

CEM-o..,my

*- 1laytie14

Pembroke-Bagley Subsector ...•...•.. 307-7

. 75

1.0

··-

c::::::J==7L::..Jr=:::,

NORTH\1\/EST

III-107A

SECTOR

�.
'

'.

8/83
MC- ,.,.. ~
SC-~~
RLC- -.-uaill...al 0:a:a=.&amp;1

BAGLEY

I •..Cf'I :

1000ft

GC-......i~
•x1

••.,.••....am:o
• TING LAND

.....

CC- ana..-.:w
MUR---~
MP- Ka)ar Park
RC- Racruuon
POS- ,.......,.. Opo, Space
OSI - Open Sp&amp;c•-Ica-:.J.t.1,1,t10:ial
V- Vacant
CEM· c-..r-1

ua•

RL-,.... o...,.., -"""""-'"
ALM-,.__,.. o.-.a.ry ~
RM----"'~
RH- a,_, o.-.a.ry ~
SAC- 9poa.o1 _,_u.o.1-a.-..-=--1
INST- ~ = = - . 1
INO- ~ ,,.,,__,...&amp;1
L1: IND- usr,. ~ . . . ,

*-

0

cO
.n
SO
75
tO
c::____f=7c=::.ic==::J
,

......

. ........

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Playfuld

.,_·-~
, GC ,
;
LC ,
• GC '-...
. ,
---.
-,.~~--...--..,.,_,~;,,il~-..
;. .: ....,.•__•••,,._....____. . ,...........,-..c..ir--•
"'-~•v··• : ~ •·•••••···••••••
•••••• •
................. ,.

1
-::,-;..n=.·;::-==::::=i

.. ;~.

i

~•

&gt;•,:••. j
,.__ !
Ge/'~-~

INST-+

r·Rc

- ~ ••• :

-

1:\•,.: . AL

~r?··

.

GC / : ) \ ~
.

-

i1 ;'i-Gc

RLC '

: •••••••• ~ ~~ :

:

i ';-RLC

~-••••

~i+•:7,c
!;;;;,
~~
.
.•

RL

f"i~~~--··r

:-RLC

: : :..................:L.
.
.
'
:--···:
RL
l-t RLC
i_,

'._:

~~-1.-..----------,w _....,_
, •-j RM.•...

• ······•····--·---···-····•·········,

. ·:; ,de

R~C

8/83

BAGLEY

P A ~ O LAND UBE

AL-= 0oncc-1 ~
ALM- ~ t . n : c.r.s..:.ty Resl.dem:J..&amp;.l
RM- .-:ii.DI o.i.a.i.~ Ra&amp;l.mnu.A.1
RH- H.1(#'1 CW..a...ry ~
SRC- _,,,., ,_,,_,u.,.1-0,,,,,,.-c.a.1
INST- insuc.-u=&amp;i
IND- Ganoru L ~
LT. IND- w.= :.-c.a---..a1

?e mbr oke - 3 a.c le ··

MC- .... ,cr c:n:a..-.....:.a..l
SC- s,-o..al er.c.=..u
RLC- i:-sicr::.,:..a..;. .'Lx:a.! ~-c..a.1
GC-c.e.ra.1~...i
CC- c,,,,._-...,., =-.-=-u
MUR-,----~
MP- iu 1or Pull
RC- ~crut :.c:,
PQS- P-erm&amp;nent. Open Space
OS I - C?'l!:-1 S;:• =•- lr. s-;::. -;: ·.,:~:.:,:-.• l
V- V•ca:it
CEM-

EJ

I ,...:'°' : 2000N

0
00

==---

,.

=

' 0

1
.... ,.

~
k1~1e,

=-,

NORTHWEST SECTOR

III-107B

�.
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

PEMBROKE-BAGLEY SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

Pembroke-Bagley Subsector, bounded by West Eight Mile Road,
Livernois, McNichols, and the John C. Lodge Freeway, is
primarily a low-density residential area.
This portion of
West Outer Drive is considered a.prominent residential feature
of this subsector. Support commercial uses are located along
the major thoroughfares while small office buildings are
prevalent along the James Couzens Highway. Located here are
the Northwest Activity Center, Lewis Business College, and
Grace Hospital, all along Meyers.
The population of this
Subsector enjoys a significantly higher level of education and
income.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, PEMBROKE-BAGLEY SUBSECTOR

The Pembroke-Bagley Subsector is an attractive, viable
residential community.
The reinforcement of this subsector
should focus on strengthening its few weak areas and
encouraging the continuation of present community activities.
Targeting housing improvement programs and commercial frontage
improvements to those areas of greatest need can help this
subsector to be of a consistently high quality throughout.
For the most part, Pembroke-Bagley neighborhoods need little
public assistance for rehabilitation or beautification.
Vacancy rates for ,multi-family units are low,
market for new development of this type.

indicating a

North of Pembroke and east of Wyoming, housing conditions
vary, with many homes needing rehabilitation and blocks
evidencing spot demolition.
Although rear parking was
provided for Eight Mile commercial establishments,
the
interface of the Eight Mile commercial uses with the
residential parcels is not always pleasant because of poor
maintenance. Another concern is the lower maintenance levels
and high vacancy rate of duplexes throughout the subsector.
In summary, the socio-economic trends for the Pembroke-Bagley
Subsector have followed many of the City-wide trends, only to
a lesser extent. Several trends point out the well-documented
changing lifestyles of today which are resulting in an
increasing dependence of the household on outside support
services such as child care, recreation, and employment
retraining.
Overall, though, the subsector appears to be a
socio-economically stable community with a strong family
orientation.
3/90

III-108

�.
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI,CIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

PEMBROKE-BAGLEY SUBSECTOR GOALS

This is a basically sound, family-oriented community.
The
problems can be solved with intelligent application of
improvement programs and favorable economic conditions. This
area should be supported so that the area will become an
increasingly desirable location to live and raise a family.
POLICY 307-7:

Pembroke-Bagley Subsector policies

Most of the following policy recommendations are preventive
and intended to encourage the continuation of the PembrokeBagley Subsector as the healthy residential community it is
presently.
Implement a special neighborhood improvement program in the
area east of Wyoming and north of Pembroke.
Such a program
should incorporate spot demolition, housing rehabilitation,
and low-density infill housing construction. Also, encourage
housing rehabilitation, private reinvestment, and occupancy
of vacant units along major and secondary thoroughfares.
Adjust commercial frontage space to current and future needs.
Improve remaining commercial frontage through available means.
On surplus commercial frontage sites, develop other uses
including green space, institutional and residential uses,
including multi-family.
Special attention should be given to the development patterns
of James Couzens and Eight Mile. Encourage the James Couzens
frontage to continue developing as a small business services
and office district while also allowing low- and moderatedensity residential development in under-utilized sections as
is presently the case.
Improve the James Couzens frontage
through facade improvements and provision of landscaped
parking facilities. Discourage consumer retail establishments
dependent upon pedestrian and impulse-oriented vehicular
traffic from locating within the James Couzens frontage,
because this type of traffic is not present.
Along Eight
Mile,
control
the
development
of
adult
entertainment
establishments and discourage the intrusion of traffic related
to the establishments and prostitution activities into the
residential areas through traffic restrictions and police and
citizen patrols.
Permit light industrial uses along the Eight Mile frontage,
so long as strict site planning standards are applied to
insure compatibility with adjacent development.
3/90

III-109

�.
PALMER

F

.J
RL
.:. . r, !
•
it :
S' i

: i

..
.
.
•

INST

..:i

.

PARK

AL.,-_.,_

RM---RH---...,--....

RLM--..-SRC--..--...INST--.IND--,.-..,.
LJ:IND-"""".,,._

MC--sc.-.,-

L...- - ~ ~

RLC-~-..

GC---..

c ..._.
c_
-MUR_

.
i

i

"·-=

NAJOI' ,.,...

RC~

-.Creauon

V•
I

• •

• &amp;RC

*·

L-!

t

C;iiiii;ia•l:le

RL

AA

LandU..

1 lncPI • 2000 It .

l,L"°'u,

: : :,rlNST
I

pa

- Propoaed Tran • i t
Station Location

•

RC

flayU.eld

•••
c.._.,..
••

II!!'

RL

j
.+. ••
...
....
....
....

V«AnC

CEM·-,.

~•NST

+-RLC

I

MP..

PQS-N. . . . . CC..-1 . . . .

LJ
ClJ
• CNI

tt

RL
a.a

SEE APPENOII FOR EXPLANATION OF LAND USE CATAGORIES .

Palmer Park Subsector .••.••.•....•• 307-8

so
,---.,

.25

NORTHWEST

III-109A

.1s..-----,
1.0

...,.

SECTOR

�.
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI.CIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

PALMER PARK SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

Bounded by Eight Mile Road, Woodward Avenue, McNichols, and
Livernois, the Palmer Pa~k Subsector is composed of several
neighborhoods, including Sherwood Forest, Green Acres Golf
Club, and University subdivisions, Palmer Woods, and the
Palmer Park apartment district. Commercial uses are located
along each of the major thoroughfares with the exception of
Seven Mile Road.
In addition, two large cemeteries are
located here, along with the Detroit Golf Club and Palmer Park
itself. The single-family neighborhoods in this subsector are
among the most affluent in the City.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, PALMER PARK SUBSECTOR

Palmer Park Subsector's greatest physical resources are its
housing stock and neighborhoods and its recreational acreage.
Together, these resources create a unique residential area in
Detroit.
Presently, a heal thy, viable area, Palmer Park
neighborhoods need little, if any, direct public assistance
for rehabilitation or beautification.
North and south of the Avenue of Fashion, the Livernois
frontage
has
a
general
commercial
orientation,
with
thoroughfare-related establishments.
Esthetically,
this
portion of Livernois suffers from the lack of plant materials,
low maintenance levels, and discordant signage and facade
designs.
In the earlier part of this decade, the Palmer Park subsector
had the highest crime rate in the Northwest Sector. Recently,
although crime remains a major problem in the apartment and
commercial areas, the single-family neighborhoods have shown
remarkable strength in crime prevention:
in fact, the area
encompassing the Greenacres, Sherwood Forest, and Palmer Woods
subdivisions had the distinction of being
the safest
neighborhoods in Detroit according to 1987 Detroit Police
Department statistics.
A concern of residents has been the potential of the larger
homes being used for adult foster care or other institutional
uses. The long-range future of the larger homes such as those
found in Palmer Park is worthy of their concern, given the
trend toward smaller households and energy conservation.
While it is believed that a demand for such homes will always
exist, the history of East Grand Boulevard and Chicago
Boulevard is still fresh. To discourage such development, the
City should work closely with State officials to discourage
3/90

III-110

�•
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

,

NORTHWEST SECTOR

State approval of a concentration of institutional homes in
the area.
PALMER PARK SOBSECTOR GOALS

This entire subsector is an extremely important resource for
the City. Its four neighborhoods of distinctive single-family
homes of fer some of the best housing opportunities in the
Greater Detroit area for middle- and upper-income families
desiring fine vintage housing and a central location in a
diverse but close-knit community.
All indications are that
these neighborhoods are persistently improving in many
respects
and
will,
with
continued
commitment,
become
increasingly recognized as one of the region's premier
residential areas.
The Palmer Park apartment complex has the potential of
becoming again the opulent multi-family community it once was,
with spacious, beautifully designed buildings and apartment
units adjacent to one of Detroit's most attractive parks,
including a public golf course and located also adjacent to
the Woodward transportation corridor.
The Livernois "Avenue of Fashion" could once again become a
vibrant retail area, taking advantage of the current revival
of the urban shopping street as a desirable alternative to
the malls, serving the surrounding affluent community as well
as the larger region.
The following policy recommendations are intended to provide
for the continuation of the unique residential character of
the neighborhoods and return the commercial and - multi-family
areas to their former stature.
POLICY 307-8:

Palmer Park Sector policies

Encourage
the stabilization and beautification of
the
Livernois commercial frontage.
While the Avenue of Fashion
should continue to be developed as a comparison commercial
district, the remaining portions of Livernois also should be
developed as attractive, secure general commercial districts.
Encourage the development of a general merchandise store as
a second anchor in the Avenue of Fashion district.
Work
closely with businesses to lessen opportunity for crime, to
develop secure parking lots, and to develop strategies and
programs to achieve future development goals.
III-111

3/90

------------

-

-

�•

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI.CJES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Encourage the continuation of the Palmer Park recreational
, area through proper maintenance, increased security, and
upgrading of facilities.
Consider the development of an
indoor recreational facility within the park -to address
weaknesses for both the areas east and west of Woodward.
Consider developing a bicycle path linking West Outer Drive
with East Outer Drive via State Fair and an easement between
Woodlawn and Evergreen Cemeteries, which are only separated
by a fence.
If this is not feasible, consider developing a
bike lane along Seven Mile as an alternate route, or perhaps
a route through the Green Acres subdivision.
Encourage continued community crime prevention programs.
Mount a major campaign to rid Palmer Park and the apartment
district of its criminal element. Provide special patrols of
apartment parking areas. Use all available means to prevent
crime in the commercial areas, giving particular attention to
the Avenue of Fashion area.
Should a residential structure become vacant, provide any
necessary assistance to assure proper maintenance until it
can become reoccupied.

3/90

III-112

�•
Lr--,

r, .:;:-i

•
'.

.. ,,~GC:::::..,

/!'• - ~- - - - - ·

. .~

i+RM

----

RL

: I

RL
_

GC&gt;,

1
~~-~·····-L.·-·-···:
........
i:i

..

- · - ~ND uaa
Rl-,_...,_.,.~

RLM-,....._.,...,...,.~
RM--.. . . , . . . , . ~

_:_ _-_-___ _ _ _ _ _'--R-L_c_+..,:'&lt;~.:-1.Jr~ - -

...

-;

4i

RL

INST,

RL

RH-1i191Dmoi&lt;Y~
SRC- ai-:w - . - u a i ~
INST-IM&lt;i--.i
IND--.rai--=ai
ll:IND-u.,..__
TRC- Tborouqhfan aeudent.ial-c~cial
MC-,-,cra-cw.
SC-9-iala-rd&amp;l
RLC- ~ ~
GC--.i.-cw

cc--0-........,

MUR-...---.-uai
MPAC ..

Major Park
RecrHt.ion

POS- Pemanen.t. Opan Space
OSl-0pen Spac•- In s -:.uutional
V- Vacant.
CEM-.,._,,

1

*-

Playfi•ld

AA

lb,......
0,0

,,.... aooott.
.:IS

.IO

_

.75

...

1-0

.....

'-----'r::::::i:___,~

NORTHWEST

~ir_;
:

G~
(

" (~,

I

'; GC

.

.. ..,,._~

CERVENY

·-.;,--·--·-·-------···1·t·r··-··-····--········
' • •
lL1'
RMI!i
i

SECTOR

mRANDMDNT

ij··

I' . I
~

,'t:

:

;~ . ..I
I''" ,

lt" !

1

RL

;~_; I

.

:
RMi

:; -

'

RLM

I

~

:_~,-_.-:.-~ •.•.

:.!-...='

·"'···-~-~-~.

.....r---···-=

••••••• •~,, INST'r7

·•...

Gel

•••

RLM

/ "~'

~

~!=l~lc.Ei.L

••

RH- .,_., ,.,....

: :
":: ::

:

:

: INST

RM,,::::

': :

:, ___ _:

'

cc--a:.arcw

MUR-

RL

··········:~~·········.l
.. . ....- i_,==-;;,'="0~0="========
•••••••

Ge:••

··=K~:

RLM

-\

•e:
j I
: :

~----·

••,

•••

•-...

I

.----!~
...
...
.: .:M2!'

RL

••

JEFFRIES

FWY

I

I

:

• -

•••• ·

~,1:

or

M3

....

-- ~

M2

" ull erton

Mi-' u. - . - t i . a l
MP- NaJor Park
RC .. bcrHucn
POS- ,........,.~ &lt;&gt;pen Spaee
OSI .. Open Spac•-In • tl.t uticnal
V- Vacant

CEM-c.-ry

*-

, r····~·
········'!f··,.
:i' 1
:
·-.....
•••
••
•••

RL

~

SRC- 9-ia! - • -t.1a1-a:..n:ia1
INST-1-1--.i
INO-a....i:l..-aial
ll:IND-u.,.._-=-i
TRC- Thoro~htar• au.idential .. C~rcU l
MC-,-,cr o.-.ci&amp;l.
SC-._;.t.1.-cw
RLC- -.-uai/1""'1 ~
GC- - . i .-cw

:

Ir~

RL

U-

RL-,- Dmoity ~
RLM- ,....._.._ ,.,...,. ~
RM-_,__.,. - . - u a i

~······~·--·········

~, i

, °'_~-~
,.. ._: ,_
..;:_ •-,·

:

:

:1

{"_;CJtTAN

;:

•

:

RLC

~~ !

---.....-a

•~-,_.,,....,,_ I.AND

RL

:

=~ ii--

s~ il'. "" ~4

SEE APPENDIX FOR EXPLANATION OF LANO USE CATEGORIES

Cerveny-Grandmont Subsector •.•••••• 307-9

Playfield

AA

lbn0r111
a.a

LJ
ClJ
•c,.•

1 Inell • 2000 fl .

.:as

.so

.75

,.a

"---r===i

'-----1~

NORTHWEST

III-112A

...,.

kll . . . . . .

SECTOR

I

�r
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

CERVENY-GRANDMONT BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Cerveny-Grandmont Subsector is an increasingly familyoriented general residential area bounded by McNichols on the
north, Ardmore on the east, the Jeffries Freeway on the south,
and the Southfield Freeway on the west. It is bisected by the
major commercial thoroughfare, Grand River.
In addition to
housing, three small but significant industrial parcels are
located along its southernmost boundary. It is a relatively
affluent area with higher levels of education, income, and
labor force participation than the City as a whole.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, CERVENY-GRANDMONT SUBSECTOR

Cerveny-Grandmont's greatest asset
is its housing and
neighborhoods.
A well-rounded community, its housing is
sound, neighborhoods attractive, and support services are
plentiful.
Yet, certain aspects of the subsector do need
improvement.
In the subsector's housing, structural weaknesses center
around aging, poorly protected wooden portions and appendages,
including porches and overhangs. The small multiples (flats)
found in many areas of this subsector often are in need of
more repairs than its single-family counterpart.
This subsector, compared to other parts of Detroit, is
relatively under-served by recreation land and buildings, and
is rated by the Recreation Department as "severely" lacking
in public playfields.
Vacant lots and structures are often in evidence in the
Cerveny-Grandmont Subsector. Given the overall condition of
the residential areas of this subsector, the modest overall
vacancy rate, compared to the City's rate, the family
orientation of the subsector, and the income levels, this
subsector should be considered a prime location for a
cooperative reinvestment program involving area financial
institutions.
The area bounded by Fenkell,
Ardmore,
Fullerton,
and
Greenfield is the oldest part of this subsector.
Lots are
smaller,
driveways
are
less
common,
and
there
are
proportionately more vacancy and maintenance problems.
Commercial frontages are showing some deterioration and are
in need of remedial improvement measures.
The area has a
surplus of commercially-zoned land and businesses are
3/90

III-113

�r
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

scattered and should be clustered into viable concentrations
• along healthy commercial strips and at key nodes and
intersections.
While the vacant industrial sites are readily accessible by
both rail and road, they are - also adjacent to and of ten
abutting relatively strong residential areas.
Each of the
sites has a structure which appears adaptable to other
industrial uses, and the sites and structures are relatively
modern.
The· sites
straddling Greenfield
comprise
a
significant amount of industrial acreage with a corresponding
potential for jobs: on the other hand, the sites are cut off
from other like industrial sites by the Jeffries and
Southfield Freeways.
In addition, Detroit has a substantial
amount of under-utilized industrial land adjacent to other
industrial acreage with the potential of forming substantial
industrial parks offering the same or more employment
potential.
Low-medium density housing consisting of a variety of
structure and ownership types could be considered for some of
these vacant industrial sites.
In the interim, before final
determination of the long-range future of these parcels,
rezone the parcels to a more restrictive industrial category
in order to prevent industries of greater objection to
residential areas from locating here.
This subsector is deficient in both recreation land and
program buildings.
In terms of recreational outdoor space,
it should be noted that the Cerveny-Grandmont Subsector is
primarily composed of low-density housing with yard space,
providing limited recreational space.
Although this is a
mitigating factor, the deficiency of large playfield space
still exists and, when feasible, a playfield should be
incorporated into the subsector.
CERVENY-GRANDMONT SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Cerveny-Grandmont subsector should continue as a sound
family-oriented
community with attractive middle-income
housing and neighborhoods, adequate recreation space, and
well-organized shopping ares.
Industry should remain and
provide a healthy employment base, but should be well-buffered
from residential areas.

3/90

III-114

�r"'

I

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

POLICY 307-9:

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Cerveny-Grandmont Subsector policies

Encourage housing rehabilitation programs, especially in the
southeast quadrant
of
this
subsector,
including
code
enforcement, loans and grants, cooperative reinvestment
activities wi t.h local financial ins ti tut ions, sweat equity
allowances, and vacant housing rehabilitation and occupancy
incentives.
Provide selective spot demolition of abandoned
structures.
Develop inf ill housing, where feasible.
Give
special emphasis to vacant housing
rehabilitation and
occupancy, and to incentives for landlords to maintain and
improve their property. Split vacant lots between adjoining
properties and encourage off-street parking, where feasible.
Discourage random location of comparison retail uses:
concentrate major commercial development along McNichols and
Grand River. Reinforce the shopping node at Grand River and
Greenfield as a comparison commercial center, and discourage
non-consumer and non-pedestrian oriented uses.
If market conditions become favorable, encourage low-density
multiple
and
townhouse
development
along
Puritan
and
Schoolcraft.
Maintain the Greenfield frontage as mixed
residential and commercial; insure adequate screening of
adjacent residential uses.
Phase-out surplus and vacant industrial sites, and encourage
low- and medium-density housing if market conditions become
favorable.
Develop a recreation program building
Southfield and Fenkell.

3/90

in

the

vicinity

of

III-115

�i

•

! GC t_
·······~.. i.t. iR'i:=.·r-~.
, ,_ r............... •
• .......... •
••.~ •.
GC

:f :
: i

~

1

··= ~~. RL
: ~r.~•..
RLM : • • . ,\._.••
RL
: : :.~,·::':'-_••.
: : •. \(':&gt;.4 GC

LtlR1WsTl:
: .-., ...-..!

RL

=.

:

RM...:-, :

+···

. ...............

INST

l

:

GC-.

:

: i,r-••••••··•••••••:

: •
:.,...,; · ·
: l..f&gt;i.T.IND./GC

:j

RL

•
:
:

........ ~ ... :................ : :. •• :• .,;;..:_;_. ...,...; I :'" ........... ~ .~~•~•~· ............ _.:

.....ac:ri
r.....Gt..····-r-·R;:f
..-.;:"•-~:·j il..cic·· ....: ................G..c·~=·
•, •
• ,. .......... / ~ :
RLM
H:

!; l

RL

: :

:i:

RL ... :,T~
RLM ·~i":~

l!

RLM R

~LGC'GE

&gt;'WY

:,..

\v: ~¢:-;: ·-·:·#4f-J#P!£-ti-t#i§l QI

M: :
: :

RLC/GC
ft
1......... •.•••••••.••••
••••: Jh~•••···•••••·•!!"•~•~~•••••••·••••••·••
-·· ·----• .......Get t............·-·rrGc..........""""i 1· r-.....tT·itioiac'..······......i

§:

LT ..... :
RLC/GC
IND• :• • ••
.......o..~
. ••••••••• .,.

I

: :

..,

&lt;

RL

:·--·····_.•~··...... :

S=~ :

~- fl.LT

:
:

:

...!

RL

: :

;:

:

:2,. !

RL

:..

~1•:
~

! LT
~GC
RC : IND~ :
:
:

IND~:
:

RLM

GC_.:-,;

~

:-::

E:

=-

LT. IND.
1NO:-L....L1fio•~~ - i N B........: ~ ~ ; · ~

:·· ..··--~ : IND :

. . .~=

:

f: :

3:; j. :

r

j _._ ·{ ·.·
P•~A.:..--•• ..: • t
RL

=
r.&lt;'' ·· ·

i

r.;'::.•.';;.-•·

, ,.,

1· ·

SEE APPENDIX roR E:Xl'LANAnON o r LAND USE CATEGORIIS

I

I

HARMONY VILLAGE

..... ··--

t_,.

MC-..;cr-.:i&amp;l

SC-9-IAla-c..aJ.
RLC-~GC--.ia-c..aJ.

cc-..---

1 IMIIII I

MUR-..--~

--~&amp;.AND ....

YI

0

MP- Najar Park
AC- ..enaUon

RL---'Y~
RLM--.. - ' Y ~

1

--

··-

=:::,

OSI• Open Space-Inatituuanal
V· Vacant
CEM--,.

*-

-....

r=======t====,'=='
,o
o.o
50
n
7S

POS--•-nspoe,,

RM----&lt;Y~
RH-a1t11,....'Y~
SRC- lpac:i.o1 - - . . . . . - - - . , .
INST - ,_,___,_
IND--.i--=ai
ll: IND- U;M - . i

@

JOOOft

'--'

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Playfield

I••-•-•••-••••••~

..-------!.
INST

:

:..
:

:

:

RL

•

------:.
.

C•J A 1T AN

--:

RLM
RL

•• ' ~r,c,c
'"'J V ,.. ..,,...
~
..... , _.J',,~"?'-~"!.!~:::r,•
, .•

~

~- 'is-.,i=.iti-"·~mm~.....~ ~- . . - ~ ·. ,~
RLM

•f • • r•·:·····GC INDi
RL

l

RLC

: GC

(

!
:

.-1;
!-,
J,T. . •

:,

!,

RL
M

.

-

:•

:j,..-RM
RL

1 .
·_.,.
~
r+: I.'.. ; :
:
--Ji~
?-rlND ~ i RC ! IND
f
LT.

::

LND

I

:

~

SEE APPENDIX FOR E&gt;Cllt.AMATION

HARMONY VILLAGE

--

_ _...
__.,
_ LANCI U ••

RL-,...,....'Y~
RLM- , _ , . -&lt;Y - . - . . . i
RM- - .. - &lt; Y ~
RH- a1111 amoi'Y _.........,

SRC- _ . ~ - = - i
INST- 1 - 1 - - . i
IND--ll:IND-""--

or

LAND USE CATEGORIES

MC- MIJcr Cl:na:ci&amp;l
SC-9-IAl~
RLC- -.-...i/l.Oeal o:am:-cw
GC-Gacal~
CC-o:,q,uua,CDmmcw

.....

MUR-..--~
MP- Ma j or Park
RC- AecreaUan
POS- ......,.,,, ·epen

051 • Open
V•

0
spoe,,

Space-In • titutional

o.o

,----, =

n

50

rs

,.o

Vacant

CEM--,.

*- Pl,ayfield

Harmony Village Subsector .....•.•.. 307-10

NORTHWEST SECTOR

III-llSA

�THE DETROIT ..!!ASTER PLAN OF POLICIES
HARMONY VILLAGE SOBSECTOR:

NORTHWEST SECTOR

BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

This subsector is the general residential area bounded by
McNichols, Livernois, the Detroit Terminal Railroad, and
Ardmore Road. An industrial corridor runs along the Harmony
Village southern boundary between the railroad and Lyndon.
This subsector is synonymous with the Harmony Village Thousand
Homes project area.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, HARMONY VILLAGE SUBSECTOR

The Harmony Village Subsector developed primarily between 1925
and 1945. The greatest bulk of structures were built between
1925 and 1934.
Harmony Village's vacancy rate for multiples of over five
units is exceptionally high, with one-fifth of the units being
vacant and available.
There is a need for rehabilitation
programs of all kinds as well as a need for continued
judicious
spot demolition of vacant
structures,
which
( frequently vandalized and used as hangouts) constitute a
blighting influence on the surrounding area.
Lack of
maintenance and misuse of vacant lots for dumping and
abandonment of cars also results in environmental problems.
The industrial corridor along its southern edge is relatively
modern and has the potential to continue as an area providing
significant amounts of employment and revenue well into the
future.
There is an overabundance of commercial land, and commercial
activities are unorganized and scattered along various
thoroughfare frontages.
HARMONY VILLAGE SOBSECTOR GOALS

The Harmony Village subsector has seen some deterioration over
the past few years, but with a reversal of the trends which
caused the deterioration, a steady long-term improvement in
the quality of the area is possible.
In addition, various
programs to address specific problems such as spot demolition,
rehabilitation, and reorganization of the commercial areas can
be brought to bear to address short-term problems.
The future envisioned for the Harmony Village Subsector is as
a solid residential community with a full range of convenient
goods and services available in an attractive, safe, and wellplanned setting.
3/90

III-116

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

POLICY 307-10:

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Harmony Village Subsector policies

Provide
a
full
range
of
rehabilitation
programs,
as
appropriate to each given area, including spot demolition,
rehabilitation of both vacant and occupied housing, and loans
and grants for housing improvements as they become available.
Work closely with citizen groups
programs for specific areas.

to

determine

the

best

In areas where intensive spot demolikion has occurred
resulting in large areas of vacant land, encourage maintenance
of lots and construction of infill low-density, one- and twofamily structures. Where spot demolition has been little or
modest and lots are less than-45 feet wide, encourage owners
of properties adjacent to vacant lots to assume ownership and
maintenance of vacant lots.
Provide a full range of revitalization assistance to remaining
viable commercial uses.
Decrease the overall amount of
commercial
land available.
Local and general
retail
activities should be encouraged to develop in activity nodes
at or near major intersections. Wyoming, Livernois, and James
Couzens should be reinforced in this manner. Lyndon frontage,
which is presently under-utilized industrial, should be
considered for general commercial and business activities,
landscaped auto parking for the industries across the street,
and for a landscaped buffer between the residential and
industrial areas. Develop the Harmony Village Market into a
year-round facility.
Encourage
the
development
of
an
industrial
corridor
improvement organization involving representatives of the
existing firms and local financial institutions. Assist firms
and
the
aforementioned
organizations
with
physical
improvements to the area and to industrial facilities through
planning and site design expertise, tax incentives, and
industrial development programs. New entrepreneurs should be
informed
of
and
encouraged
to
utilize
administrative
assistance programs.
Encourage the reinvestment in and
modernization of existing facilities through information and
training forums on such themes as energy conservation, high
technology, and practical applications of computer technology.
Encourage the improvement of environmental conflicts between
residential and industrial uses.
Insure the construction of
attractive opaque screening of outdoor storage areas and large
parking areas.
3/90

III-117

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIC.IES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

• Where residential uses are across from an industrial facility,
encourage the firm to locate its office and administrative
functions in the area with the greatest visual contact with
the residential area.
Permit limited support commercial
services to develop along the north side of Lyndon.

3/90

III-118

�r

•

MCNICHOL

ax.- L.AND uall
_NC. . . . . . .D

Rl-i.ow,..,...,,..-.i
RLM- , _ , . ,.,.,_.,, ~
RM--.. - . . . , , ~

..
. ..
..
...
..
....
:·· -----

RH-.,,_,,..,...,,~

SRC- lpocW ~~

:•-..--!
:

INSr

INST - -..tu=o&amp;l
IND- - . . a i - . . . . i
LJ: IND~
TAC- Thoro,..qhf•r• Raal.dent.ial-c~rcial
MC-,-;er-

Li,_,.

Rl

RLM

····-·i
RLM
t••··········~-t!-••·····················••-..
GC

r-·..······~::······

SC-~-.:w
RLC-~a-rc..ai

GC-c..ni-.:w

cc-~~

\

,, .,

:···
: IND
:':. , &lt;&gt;~-~
-,
\

LODGE

,..
~

:••• Rl,C

~WY

-!!!;!_...........

__,.,.r•..•.•.•......•_••;•:•~•...••.•.•-"!"1-l•N•D-•..,•~•.~•_,,,•.

'"
,,...
? .

~

'

MUR-...--~
MP- ttaJor Park
RC- Aacreauon
POS- ,.....,.,,, Open

OSI• Open
V•

Space

Space-Ins':..1.tut.l.ono1 l

Vacant

CEM-,_....,,

*-

Playfhld

GC

t_

·-••200011 .

-

,,,

1

~=====i
0.0

.21
.so
..---,

,.........,1.1

.71

-

c:::::::::,

c__:.,
S'Et APPENDIX FOR EXPLANATION OF !AND USE CATtGORIES

NORTHWEST

SECTOR

MCNICHOLS

....

GC
MCN

..
..
.: .:
: :
..

INST

ua•

SRC--,-.-.w~

RL

INST- 1-1tuUa0&amp;1
I ND- a..za1 ~
LJ:IND-Li¢&lt;~
TRC- Thoroughfare lleaident.ial•Cmaarcia l
MC- ,.jar Cl:alardAl

RLM

:-= -·----.:
'::

LA.NCI

ti,_,,..,...,,~

HOLS

~

: :

--

-•

RL-,-,..,..,:y~
RLM- , - , . 0mo1,:y ~
RM--..o.mtv~
RH-

FUS I T A N • • • ~ ~

I

SC--,o:..rcw

GC \

RLC-~-

GC- Ollnoral CC--a:..=-it.1
MUR-...--~
MP- NaJor Park
RC- RecrHtl.on
POS- Penl&amp;nent Open Space
OSI - Open Spu;e-Inatnut1.0nal
V- Vacant

"'\· ,
,.._
'

CEM-c:e-ry

*-

Playfield

AA
LT. IND

l.1:,".,...

Stt APPENDIX FOR EXPLANATION

or

LJ
ClJ
.....

1 lftCtl • 2000 ft.

LAND USE CATEGORIES

o.a

..---, =

.21

.so

NORTHWEST

McNichols Subsector ..•.••••.•••••.• 307-11

III-118A

.11

,.a

...,.

SECTOR

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

MCNICHOLS SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The McNichols Subsector is a general residential area bounded
by Highland Park, the Detroit TErminal Railroad, Livernois,
and McNichols Road.
A major industrial corridor runs along
the southern boundary. Also located here are the University
of Detroit and St. Francis Home for Boys.
This subsector has seen a dramatic decrease in population
since 1970.
The poverty rate is high relative to both the
Northwest Sector and the City as a whole.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, MCNICHOLS SUBSECTOR

In the area south of Puri tan, residential structures are
primarily frame but brick structures are not uncommon; type
of structures is mixed, with flats being common · and moderatesized apartment buildings located on ~orner sites; structures
are close as lots are narrow without front access drives;
streets are narrow and often over-parked; maintenance varies
from structure to structure and yard to yard, with most
structures evidencing need of repair; prevalence of vacant
structures and vacant lots and numerous vacancies among
individual flats.
The
McNichols
Subsector
has
insufficient
recreational
facilities to meet the recreational needs of its population.
For major recreation activities, residents can go to nearby
Palmer Park, but for regular and everyday recreational needs
(neighborhood oriented), the subsector is lacking both indoor
and outdoor facilities.
Residential to industrial conflicts are apparent in the area.
Interfaces between residential land uses and industrial uses
are not always smooth or attractive. Open storage areas also
are common and most often are unsightly. Circulation problems
may also exist.
Truck traffic may be forced to use
residential streets to gain access to industries located
between the railroad and Bourke, and to those located on Idaho
and Woodrow Wilson.
Although 12th Street is residential on
both sides, its southern portion serves as a local truck route
for industries along Woodrow Wilson and Idaho.
There is an over-abundance of commercial land, especially in
the category of local commercial.

3/90

III-119

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:I.l:IES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

MCNICHOLS SUBSECTOR GOALS

Most of the weaknesses in the McNichols' housing stock can be
corrected or lessened significantly, given adequate resources
within the near future.
While a large proportion of the
residential stock in the area is aged_and deteriorated, most
of the housing is rehabilitable.
Spot demolition of vacant,
dangerous structures will be a continuing need; and the
advantage to this, besides removing blight, will be to lower
densities to a ·more desirable s~andard.
The underlying goal is for the creation of a sound residential
community,
largely
through
rehabilitation
of
existing
structures, and the provision of a reasonable level of
amenities in the form of new recreational facilities, enhanced
public spaces, and attractive, well-organized and convenient
shopping and services.
POLICY 307-11:

McNichols Subsector policies

Initiate rehabilitation programs designed to bring residential
stock up to code and to increase energy efficiency, especially
in the areas south of Puritan and east of Log Cabin. Utilize
vacant lots to increase the lot size of adjacent parcels for
developing front access driveways and garages, and for
neighborhood-oriented recreation areas.
Initiate vacant structure rehabilitation and occupation
programs.
Consider rehabilitation of small multiples for
subsidized low-income housing.
Reduce the amount of local commercial space, especially on
Puritan and Fenkell, and encourage local commercial districts
to locate toward major intersections.
Frontages between
districts should be developed for residential use or as
landscaped buffers between the residential areas and the
trafficways. Limit general commercial districts to Livernois
and to Fenkell near Linwood as support for the industrial
district to the south.
Encourage the small commercial
district along McNichols to continue having a high maintenance
level.
Employ all applicable measures to encourage the continuation
of the industrial corridor into the future. Work closely with
the various firms to develop the corridor into an area which
can meet their long-range needs.

3/90

III-120

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI.CES

NORTHWEST SECTOR

Provide for the elimination .gf environmental conflicts,
including
traffic circulation,
between residential
and
industrial uses.
Consider expansion of the industrial
corridor's northeast corner (north of the Lodge Freeway) west
to 12th and north to Pilgrim or Puritan.
Permit limited
support commercial services to develop along the west side of
12th.
In this same area, work with Highland Park officials
toward strengthening this industrial area for continued
activity into the future.
Encourage
the
development - of
neighborhood-oriented
recreational facilities. As opportunity and funding permit,
assemble residential vacant lots which are central to the
neighborhood to form recreational areas for both children and
senior citizens.
In the interim, some limited recreation
programming at the Hally Elementary/Middle School or community
access to some of the University of Detroit facilities would
help residents of the subsector and probably adjacent
subsectors
as
well.
Develop greenbelts
and
passive
recreational areas as buffers and as interim use between
conflicting uses such as between residential areas and
industrial
corridors,
between
the
heavily
trafficked
thoroughfares (such as highways) and residential areas.

3/90

III-121

�~-.-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~iES

RIVERFRONT AREA

ARTICLE 308

RIVERFRONT AREA

This Article is reserved for future text and/or maps
pertaining to . Riverfront Polici~s.

3/90

III-122

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:U:IES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

ARTICLE 309
SOUTHWEST SECTOR

SOUTHWEST SECTOR LOCATION AND EXTENT

The Southwest Sector is a 21-square mile area of the City of
Detroit. This compares with the total land area for the City
of 139.6 square miles; therefore, the Southwest Sector
represents approximately 15 percent of the City's total land
area.
The Southwest Sector lies west of the Lodge Freeway
and south of the Ford and Jeffries Freeway. The western and
southern City limits, including the Detroit River and the
former Detroit Terminal Railroad (now Conrail) form the other
boundaries.
Nine subsectors lie within the Southwest Sector. They include
Jeffries, Condon, Tireman, Hubbard-Richard/Corktown, VernorJunction, Springwells, Chadsey, West Riverfront, and Boynton.
SOUTHWEST SECTOR PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS

Southwest Detroit has two outstanding economic characteristics: an exceptional concentration of very heavy industry,
and a unique convergence of freight transportation modes.
Weaknesses of the Sector relate to economic obsolescence in
both the industrial and commercial plant.
Strengths of the
area include the Detroit River as a unique attraction, the
fixed nature of the transport infrastructure, the availability
of many sound industrial buildings, and the shopping habits
of many local residents favoring neighborhood stores.
Detroit's major concentration of ports, rail facilities, truck
terminals, pipelines, international crossings and associated
or support facilities and organizations occurs in the
Southwest Sector. This remains unchanged despite the serious
and continuing erosion of the Sector's manufacturing base.
Only to a limited extent can changing technology, changing
corporate ownership patterns, or other evolutionary factors
disperse southwest Detroit's highly significant concentration
of freight facilities.
In fact, prevailing economic forces
actually favor continued concentration.

III-123

3/90

I

--------

- - - - - --

= - - - - c . . c

�SUBSECTORS

r---'t-~=---~-c

~--..

~,

1 inch, t.1mlle

~
acret

,----,

,----,

~I__.._J

0

.5

1

1.5

2 mlle

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Boynton Subsector ••.••..•.•••.•..•• 309-16
Chadsey Subsector .......•.••.•..... 309-14
Condon Subsector ••.•.•••.•••.•..... 309-9
Hubbard-Richard/Corktown Subsector 309-12
Jeffries Subsector •.•••...•••...••. 309-8
Springwells Subsector ..••••••.•.... 309-13
Tireman Subsector ••••••••.••.•..••• 309-10
West Riverfront Subsector .•..•.•.•• 309-15
Vernor-Junction Subsector .......•.• 309-11

�GENERALIZED

REZONING CONCEPT
RI
112
/13

•

R
RS

116
Bl
B2
BJ
84

B6

SINGl£·F AM/LY RESIDENTIAL
TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
LOH·DENSrTY RESIDENTIAL
THOROUGHFPRE RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM·DENSrTY RESIDENTIAL
HIGH·DENSrTY RESIDENTIAL.
RESTRICTED BUSINESS
LOCAL BUSINESS/RESIDENTIAL
SHOPPING DISTRICT
GENERAL BUSINESS
GENERAL SERVICES

Ml

L/MrTED INDUSTRIAL
RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
INTENSIVE INDUSTRIAL
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL
SDI SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
!resldenl!ol,wlfh limited commerclolJ
SD2 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
!commerclol,wlfh limited resldent/a/J
SD
PROPOSED SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
RIVERFRONT MIX USE
M2
M3
M4
MS

•

PD

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC CENTER
PCA RESTRICTED CENTRAL BUSINESS

PC

TM
WI

TRNISrTIONAL INDUSTRIN..
WATERFRONT INDUSTRIN..

PR

PMKS and RECREATION

,.

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

�r
THE · DETROIT MASTER PLAN ·OF POL~IES

.

-

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

The . Southwest Sector, therefo:c.e, will remain an area of
primary economic importance, and industrial activities, within
the limits ef sound planning and environmental protection.
Keys to the renewal of the Southwest area will include an
improved education system aimed at specific needs of the
residents (including career training and the re-education of
adults), a safe, secure, and. healthy environment, good
recreational facilities, and improved public transportation.
Social problems characteristic of the City as a whole are all
represented here.
Of particular concern to residents,
howeve~, is the location of such facilities as adult foster
care homes and pre-release adjustment centers, among others.
POLICY 309-1:

Southwest Sector - Land Use

Portions of Buchanan, Milford, Tireman, South Fort, and
Livernois should be gradually redeveloped from general
commercial uses to more residentially compatible uses.
Promote riverfront land uses which are appropriate to their
location.
Correct
conditions
of
unsafe
or
blighted
structures.
Care for vacant land and plan for its reuse.
Secure more City control over the Riverfront.
Study and
address the distribution of social facilities such as adult
foster care home, pre-release adjustment centers,
etc.
Establish and implement a comprehensive program for the
management of toxic waste material, giving highest priority
to arresting and preventing toxic waste impact on the land
and people in the Southwest Sector.
POLICY 309-2:

Southwest Sector - Residential Development

Encourage and assist housing conservation and rehabilitation.
Buffer small pockets of housing in areas that are, or may
eventually become, industrial or commercial. Support existing
residential uses in mixed use areas.
Encourage owner
occupancy and home sharing. Support construction of smaller
housing units and infill housing.
POLICY 309-3:

Southwest Sector - Commercial Development

Develop neighborhood commercial districts.
Improve both the
appearance and function of commercial areas.
Encourage
neighborhood commercial development to reflect the ethnic
character of neighborhoods.
Implement zoning changes to
improve commercial strips and protect neighborhoods.

3/90

III-124

�~ --.-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIJ:IES
POLICY 309-4:

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Southwest Sector_- Industrial Development

Promote the Southwest Sector as a prime location for growth
industries generating high lev~ of employment. Provide an
adequate inventory of sites of varying sizes for industrial
expansion. Demolish isolated, vacant industrial plants with
no economic potential, especially along the Grand Trunk rightof-way.
Modernize Union Produce TerminaL and other food
distribution-related facilities. Remove food and distribution
plants in inappropriate locations. Discourage new industrial
uses at the River's edge which ·do not need a river location.
Improve the environmental quality resulting from industries.
Improve industrial nodes and corridors from a design
viewpoint. Continue development and take measures to increase
the efficiency of the Port of Detroit. Continue development
of the Foreign Trade Zone as needed.
Increase uses of
district heating and use of steam for industrial processing.
Recycle surplus industrial and commercial buildings on a
selective basis.
POLICY 309-5:

Southwest Sector - Transportation System

Install a grade-separated railroad crossing at either Dearborn
Street, West End, Green, Waterman, or West Grand Boulevard.
Support modernization of the rail system and expansion of the
rail tunnel under the Detroit River. Encourage common carrier
trucking.
Develop "river roads" from Fort Street to West
Riverfront attractions such as the Bob-Lo docks, Riverside
Park, and Fort-Wayne.
POLICY 309-6:

Southwest Sector - Recreation

Enhance major points of public access to the water's edge at
Fort Wayne and Riverside Park.
Acquire and develop small
parcels for recreation use at least two acres in size
throughout the area as opportunity permits. Stabilize edges
of the Detroit and Rouge Rivers.
POLICY 309-7:

Southwest Sector - Urban Design

Recognize, enhance, and promote attractive or interesting
features in the area:
the Riverfront, the industrial
landscape, Fort Wayne, ethnic communities, the Michigan
Central
Station,
the
Ambassador
Bridge,
and
tourist
information center area.
Construct viewing platforms and
small parks to enable people to observe ships and industrial
activities; relate these to the development of "river-roads"
and a pedestrian/bicycle path.
3/90

III-125

�JEFFRIES

EXISTINQ

~

(iT

• r-·-.;~.
"7=-~•9
LJ
:

:\IS.:

•

· · ;_, ~ IN~· ··II·~.

IN T

_...
:
..

:". :
.

r.: IIIM

•••••••

•

-----

IN8T - Inacit.ution&amp;.l

IND ... a.n.ral Induac.rial

,l. -. ::.---,~~~-:-···-·
•V•

LT. IND - Light: Induac.ri&amp;.l
019T - DUc.ri.ba.Uon Indl&amp;atn.al
MC - Major ec-rcial

INaT

·:···
:.......--,

!
l

i

8C - Special C:C-rci&amp;l.

IIIL.C - ReaideD.t.i.al./t.ocal c:c-irci.al
GC - General CC-.rc::ial
CC - Ccapariaon cc:aaarcJ.al

•H

! -- ·
°'
:... '·
..
RM/ •• , ••._
I !
~=:r.1.-~----jf-~-----~--·
: .c.:
L~• :
..·~
r--·
::

RL_~lvACAN?

-.

7

: ~••
::
••ptc•••
'

,.. ~ l . .

l
:

RM

•••

1

USE

AL - tow o.naicy Reaidant:J.al
ALM - Low-Medi\m oenaicy Reaidanc.i.al
RM - M.ediuza oenaity ReaW.nci&amp;l
RH - High Danaicy Re • iden.c.ial
IIIC - Spaicial R••idancial-Cc:aaarcial

R._

······:~-s=
• ..

LAND

MUIII - Nixad

oa -

u..

°""" s.,...

baidential

POlll'T- Port

•

C9M- c-ury
V or VAC - vacant

: VACANT ··•:

LT. IND

----

s . . Appendix A tor explanation of cat.agoriaa

~

RM

,.- _ _
..,... ::•..:.:.

l.

1

lflCl'I I

2000ft .

0.0

.25

.50

,.o

.75

··-

c_.::._F=7c::_::J==1

SOUTHWEST· SECTOR

JEFFRIES

•

•

•

~ M M NCl CI
IIUTU•
Gl N RAL LAND ua

• •

AL -

Lav oen• icy

•

a. • idant.i.a.l

ALM - .t.ow-Mediua Denaicy Jtaai.dellU&amp;l
111M - M.U.ua Denai~ R.eaidant;ial
..... - Biqh Denait:y Raaidential

alltC -

Special Raiaidential-C~Rial
INaT - tnatitut.ioaal
IND - General IDduatrial
LT. INC - Light lnduatrial

DlaT - ciacribu.tion tnduauial
MC - Major CC-rcJ..&amp;l

ac - s~cial ca.arcial
RLC - R• • idantial/t.oc:al cc..arc:.1.al
QC - General c~rc1..al
CC - COllpU'i • on c~rc:ial
MUA - Mixad c- Re • 1..dent1..al

Oa -

Open Space

IIIIOSl'T - Port
ca:M - c-tary

See Appendi,x A for •xpU,l\at1..on of categori••

l.

1

tftCf'I I

EiJ-

2000ft .

=

V,

0

~

o.o

.25

.50

. 75

1

1.0

c:::=-.:r==l::-=:J,.----,
lutoffletet

SOUTHWEST SECTOR
Jeffries Subsector .......••.....•.• 309-8

III-125A

�THE DETROIT · MASTER PLAN OF POL~J:ES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

JEFFRIES SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AHO FEATURES
The boundaries of the Jeffries Subsector are the Edsel Ford
Freeway on the north, the John .C.. Lodge Freeway on the east,
the Fisher Freeway on the south, and the Jeffries Freeway on
the west.
Well-known landmarks are the Jeffries Homes, Wayne State
University's athletic campus, the Teamsters headquarters, the
Michigan Osteopathic Hospital,-Fountain Court, and Freedom
Place. The Woodbridge neighborhood, now being rehabilitated,
is part of the subsector.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, JEFFRIES SUBSECTOR
One of the major problems is the very large amount of vacant
land. Virtually whole blocks of housing have been abandoned
and demolished near the Jeffries Homes and in other portions
of the subsector. Despite the vacancy, desirable, affordable
neighborhoods survive in the Jeffries Subsector.
The
continued existence of these neighborhoods and their eventual
upgrading is seen as an important goal for the City.
Frontage along Grand River is currently underutilized and
should be seen as a potential location for high intensity
residential
development
with
compatible
commercial
development.
Older industrial buildings can be recycled for growth
industries employing large numbers of persons. Job retraining
should be offered to unemployed adults and career-oriented
education should be emphasized in the high schools serving the
area. An orderly plan for parking lots is needed in the area
immediately north of Tiger Stadium.
JEFFRIES SUBSECTOR GOALS
Al though this subsector has been particularly hard hit by
urban problems generally, there is great potential. . Its
location near the Cultural Center and the Central Business
District, strong ethnic ties and sense of community, and the
sizable parcels of vacant land available for development all
support the perception of a revitalization of this area.
Grand River would be the major corridor, intensely developed
with a well-planned mix of residential and commercial uses,
the neighborhoods would be rebuilt with new housing, and
nearby
industrial
areas
would
supply
good
employment
opportunities for the residents.
3/90

III-126

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~IES
POLICY 309-8:

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Jeffries Subsect.or Policies

Upgrade and esthetically improve the Grand River frontage;
encourage
high
intensity
r-e-sidential
with
compatible
commercial uses.
Develop a new commercial center, in a
clustered rather than strip form, and include a full-service
supermarket.
Continue rehabilitation and conservation
programs in the Woodbridge neighborhood. Improve maintenance
of the Jeffries Homes.
Provide interim uses for the vacant
land near the Jeffries Homes and west of 14th Street, and
ultimately assemble large parcels for the development of new
housing.
Provide infill housing and historic designation,
where appropriate~ in the area around Trumbull and Butternut.
In general, consider existing residents as the primary users
of new and rehabilitated housing in this subsector. Recycle
older industrial buildings, encouraging growth industries with
jobs for low-skilled workers.
Develop an orderly plan for
parking north of Tiger Stadium.
For that portion of the Jeffries Subsector generally north of
the Fisher Freeway and between the Lodge Freeway and Rosa
Parks, discourage new commercial parking from extending north
of Spruce and west of Rosa Parks Boulevard, and also
discourage commercial parking in the general area east of the
alley east of Trumbull and north of Pine.
In the area
generally bounded by Spruce, Pine, Trumbull, and Rosa Parks,
use existing housing techniques to preserve as much housing
in the short-run as feasible.
When City agencies or boards
consider approvals or variances in the above areas, encourage
buffering to be used to provide a transition and better
relationship between adjacent residential and commercial
parking areas.
Encourage development of offices and retail
facilities along Trumbull, but generally discourage further
intrusion of office and
retail
facilities
within
the
residential areas easterly and westerly from the Trumbull
frontage.
Support Tiger Stadium and its auxiliary uses and also support
the objective that, wherever feasible,
existing viable
residential development should be retained and reinforced.
For purposes of Section 82~0306 of the Zoning Ordinance, the
area bounded by Trumbull, Michigan, Rosa Parks, Spruce,
Cochrane, Perry shall be understood as "nonresidential" use,
and open parking lots for private passenger vehicles in this
area are "permitted with approval" uses.

3/90

III-127

�CDNCDN
EXISTING

R'--

LAND UBE

ta, eon.ity ~

ALM- ""'"""'1m Dlnaity

~

~Nadi.l.aDlnm.tySlam.dmti&amp;l

R - Hi¢ eon.ity ~
911C-~~~
INST- ,-J.tuda,al
INO-c..n.J.ImatzuJ.

•

'-'1: I NO- Li¢': ImatzuJ.
DIST_,,....._ _

--~__ __
-----~
_M C - l a j c r -

ac-~-

cc-,_....._

IIC-Gom&lt;al-

,_

POSIIT--.

C

• M-,_...,.

1

lftC" I

2000ft .

-

0

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

CONODN

•

•

-CDMM ND D
PUTUR
ca N RA'- I.AND u

• •

••

•

911L - Low oen • icy Reai.denc.ial.
ALM ... t.Qlf-Mediua o«n • ity Reaidanti.al
AM - MKiua can• ity Re • idenci&amp;l.
AH - Biqh t&gt;enaity R• • idalld..&amp;l

• Ille -

special Rea1.deneial-C~rcial

INaT - tnaticution.&amp;.l.
IND - General tnduau~l

LT. INCi - t.igh,:. t.ndu• 1:.rial
DlaT - oi • uibu.t.ion Induacrial

MC - Major c ~ c i . a l

ac -

special cc.aaarcial

RLC - Re • idenu..al/Local c~rcial
C3C - Ge!Mlral C.C-:rc:1.al
CC - ccw:par1.aon caa.ercial
MUA - Mixed o- R•• 1.dent.ial
Qa - Open Spa.ca ,
POlll'T - Port.
C M- c-c.ary-

•

s-

~

for •~la.nation of c:at• qon. ••

1 111Cf'I r 2000ft .

=

V,

0

~

o.o

.25

.50

.75

1.0

,

......

c==.r==L~r:::::i

··-

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Condon Subsector ....•.....•.•...... 309-9

III-127A

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLJ~JES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

CONDON SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND_FEATURES
The boundaries of the Condon Subsector are the Jeffries
Freeway on the east, the Edsel F-e--rd Freeway forms the northern
boundary, Livernois Avenue is to the west, and the Conrail
tracks lie to the south.
Well-known landmarks include the Condon Middle School, the
St. Hedwig and St. Francis of Assisi Roman Catholic churches,
and the West Warren senior housing tower.
The portions of the subsector inside West Grand Boulevard were
built in the 1900-1918 period. Outside of the Boulevard, the
homes are, on the average, a few years newer, although 98
percent of all residential structures were built before 1925.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, CONDON SUBSECTOR
The Condon Subsector does not appear to be as a single,
cohesive entity.
Rail lines, West Grand Boulevard, and
Michigan Avenue split the subsector into about four or five
separate communities.
The easternmost of the communities
(inside West Grand Boulevard) is represented by GROW (Grass
Roots Organization of Workers). The GROW area, an older part
of the subsector, has much in common with the adjacent
Jeffries Subsector.
The other residential sections of Condon resemble adjacent
portions of Ti reman, Vernor-Spr ingwells, or Chadsey.
The
neighborhoods, while advancing in age and declining in
population, remain basically intact.
The housing stock is
wood-frame housing built for the working class 70 to 80 years
ago, and thus requires heavy maintenance or repairs and
replacement or upgrading of mechanical systems.
Concentrated programs of housing conservation could be applied
to most of Condon, while it is recognized that some of the
housing is beyond repair and some neighborhoods may eventually
need total rebuilding.
Many of the factory buildings in Condon which are now closed
should not be reoccupied. Possibly, some of the open plants
should be relocated to more suitable areas within Detroit.
The Michigan-Junction commercial strip has shown recent signs
of a modest rebirth.
It should be encouraged to emerge as a
commercial center, combining shopping, transportation, highdensity housing for seniors and small families, and other
3/90

III-128

�THE. l&gt;ETROIT MASTER PLAN . OF POLI.:IES

.

functions and
regular basis.

facilities

whicll

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

attract ·-many

people

on

a

Environmental problems such as-eommercial blight, industrial
truck traffic, industrial odors, and unkempt vacant lots must
be tackled before any improvements can be expected in the
housing stock. Tree planting has been identified as a local
need, including along West Grand Boulevard.
CONDON SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Condon Subsector has a tradition of strong community
involvement. This community spirit can be harnessed to help
achieve maximum benefit from future revitalization programs.
Much of the area needs rebuilding, but once needed economic
improvements are in place, this rebuilding can start in
earnest to restore this to an area of sound neighborhoods for
families of moderate means, close to a wide variety of
employment, shopping and recreation opportunities.
POLICY 309-9:

Condon Subsector Policies

Implement housing conservation programs where feasible.
Provide adequate land-use controls to separate housing from
industry.
Relocate industries to more suitable areas where
feasible and needed to achieve better land-use patterns.
Establish a commercial center at Michigan-Junction.
Carry
out demolition and maintenance of vacant land where needed.
Encourage population growth; encourage new and rehabilitated
housing targeted to projected market.
Redirect Buchanan
Avenue frontage from commercial to residential.
Carry out
needed environmental improvements in conjunction with any
housing improvements.
Implement a tree-planting program,
especially along West Grand Boulevard.

3/90

III-129

�TIREMAN

•

EXISTING

LAND UB

---..,~
RL.-lat_tY_.

RI.M- , _ _ . . - t Y

~

RH-Bioba..itY~
AC-.......,_~--...i
IN8T- Inotl.........,_
IND--~
L.'l:INO-!J.91&amp;~
018T--~

•

_
----~cc-------~
_,__

me-~-

_'-'_,_

IIORT--.:

C • M-Cllmoory

~..

1 lflCft : 1000ft .

-

o.o

.25

.50

,.o

75

··-

.....

c=..J===t-=::J==::i

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

TIREMAN

•

•
•~

•

R CCMM NC C
~UTUR
QBN
L.ANC U

••

•

AL .. Lav Denaiey Re • identia.l
IIILM - I.oliJr-,Mediua oeuiey aeei.denU&amp;l
111M - Nediua oenai.ty b • idenu.&amp;l
lllto4 - Biqb o.n.eity Ra • idanei.&amp;l.

• IIIC ...

Special. b

• idential-O:-rd.al

INaT' - In.U.itutional
IND - General IDd\aUial

LT. INC .. .t..iqtlt I.Dduatr1.&amp;J.

OlaT - Di • trillu.e.ion Induat.rial
MC - Major c~rc:ial
ac - special c~re1..al
ALC - R•• iden.tial/t.oc:al cc-rc:1.a.l
me - General cc-rc.ial
CC - ca.parison c ~ e i a l
MUIII - Nixed UN Re • 1dene.i&amp;.l

011 - Open Spac:.

PO.-T - Pon
C • M ... c-t.ery

s-

~

l.

tor •,q:ilanation of c:ateqori••

1 ,ncf'I : 2000ft .

,----, = ...

o.o
25
SO
75
c=::::J~

1.0

ll1toMeler

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Tireman Subsector ••••••••••••.•••.• 309-10

III-129A

�-~-

THE DETROIT KASTER PLAN OF POL::IJ;IES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

TIREMAN SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES ANO FEATURES

The boundaries of the Tireman Subsector are the Jeffries
Freeway on the northeast, the Col'H:'ail (former Detroit Terminal
Railroad) tracks (and Dearborn city limit) on the west, and
Warren Avenue and the Ford Freeway on the south.
The .C hesapeake and Ohio industrial spur runs north-south
through the subsector, with the Kelsey-Hayes plant and the
Detroit Edison service shops -being the major industrial
development in the Chessie Corridor.
Other than the
industrial belt along each railroad line and a small amount
of strip commercial, the subsector is residential.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, TIREMAN SUBSECTOR

It is clear that Tireman's neighborhoods have certain
strengths and stabilizing factors.
But it is equally clear
that all neighborhoods have already experienced blighting
influences, and are experiencing difficulty in attracting or
retaining younger families.
An increase in retail facilities and programs
destabilizing
influences
are
needed,
along
employment.

to address
with
more

The Chessie industrial corridor has the potential for job
creation.
In order for more employment to be created in
southwest Detroit, this car r idor is one of the areas that
could be used to accommodate industrial growth.
Beautification and facade improvement may help to stabilize
the Warren-McGraw commercial area; such a program has begun.
In addition, an entirely new convenience retail center is
recommended for the intersection of Tireman and Epworth. This
center would not only fill a need for retail services, but
would help foster a sense of community and more of a positive
feeling, or "sense of place" for Tireman Subsector's various
neighborhoods.
TIREMAN SUBSECTOR GOALS

This area has experienced some decline, as have most
neighborhoods in this part of the City.
The major needs re
more employment, better shopping, and housing stabilization.
With an increase in industrial facilities, a new retail center
and a program of neighborhood improvement, coupled with better
organization of land uses, the Tireman Subsector will become
an increasingly desirable balanced community where a family
3/90

III-130

�I

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:u;IES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

can live, work, and play in close proximity to many of the
City's major resources.
POLICY 309-10:

Tireman Subsect-o-r Policies

Encourage industrial growth in. the Chessie rail corridor.
Upgrade the Warren-McGraw commercial area.
Establish a new
retail center at the intersection of Tireman and Epworth;
include senior citizen housing.
Rezone industrial land to
accommodate this change. Increase the stock of sound housing
- both rehabilitated nd new units - for small households, as
market projections indicate, and encourage owner-occupancy.
Where pockets of housing are in areas where industrial
expansion is desirable, buffer these housing areas through use
of TM (Transitional Industrial) zoning.

3/90

III-131

~

�•

....✓

:
1

k~-M

...

~--.-·
IND

'-;,
, _ 1-.1
- • --~ ~ G C
; "-+,.I --

IND

.:-,

t -........

:

~~;

_

=---=----:

•

--:...

l

.:
-·:-•=!i
=••.:.7
~----··-····•---.W•-- -·
.... :

1

INC

•LM

- . l · ~••

:
::

I ' :-

-..;-..Y--J~ _ , ~ ; ~

.__ - mc-----.:·~

II'•--

'-··---= ,--

-~

:

4t-1N•T
•--•

•LM

a.-: :--:

a•

••••
.+••••

I

.. LM

i

1N• T

~

RLM

·r:

~

•

•I

,

JI i
-I :

••-.__! ---·--

:--

:

; .....

....
i
=
; . ••••,.:l
"L"".
......•••••-.,_.,.,...,.,•.,..:...:..~•.:....•••=
;.._-.::...--------··-·-···············
- - . -.:..-:. . .-. __. .,_ ---. ·-- ---l---•-----

- . ; . ~ ·- -•.

,:i... __ •• ·.- - -·. -" · "

.

__ ;,,. __

• ··

LT. IND- Li4bC

VERNOR-JUNCTION

• Xl • TING

. _.. .. __ ,

• -

IN

__,...,

T

--..,.i

CII.-T•-_-Mjcrec-ctal

2000"-

1 UICfl I

__--_
cc---

-

ac- 1
1 1 1ec-ctal
.C-~-

LAND UBE

..._.

---1:Y~
--~--=al

-Opm--

IIIL•1-a..ity..-....i
_
_ _ _. , . . . - . . . . i

_...,_

,---, =

o.o

.25

PCIIIIT· _.,

•i+---,:y~

.50

75

,.o

CIIM-~

IN.-T•n.ti-..-1
INO--,Indlatz:l.al

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

,••!~.

.~

••••LT.i. ~•••

••• .

f-.......

- ....•·.•···

.... .._..:
~-s•····
=
• ······:
:

....... ,...

•L.M

~! ..
=:..-··:~.•··
.... ...
✓••• :a-=

.-•

IND•

• •

1

:.,;M :

•~!•.:··-a
~L

INO

\

•

-

"-t,.._

•--.,:.·..

,tLT'1N0••••:

• · : . - · · - - - : • • •: : · · · · · · : . . . .

•

:. ~~

=--=-··:. :........

:.';!.~'!'~~ :..... ~

•••••!:.":
-~.
.
.:"":.
;• - ~~.
.
•••
···~.···•7:
r.~•···················--·••·--············••-:
•••r-.. ,._:
.........:::-~:-~.::~:::::.::::.-a.·~r
.t••
:
:
•
:a• ! : : :
•••

::

911LM

..

_.

4-1N

....• -:_

••

LT IN0

:

T

.~~..........:
••..._

;,..r• •••••
:

?-.,•.

: -

..:t•t• ,t.-~

•••

ALM
ALM

•.

- •

•
:

:- 1:.::•.J,-

:

-·-·•.

.............- ...............---............
·, ,• - -,c;.'

s- ·

:

:

•JIILM•

•

•
INll'I:

•
:

i i=-~
~

~~

r••
~
•

-::

-------·------.i....ih.•
:

~ ~- ~ ~ - J o i C . 1 1 ~ ~ , -

►•~~~ ~~·

:

•

:~

. / .~·
&lt;?- ,..,,.,.. -.

:

: ••• ,

•••••••••••

- - ~ - ! ~..

.

. .

;u.-. ~ - - - . - ~ - - ,.

:··;(

:

J
•••

~...

~

.;J'

..i_..-l••' .
. ... ;
~
_ _....

.

••,...;;.;,,

\,-"'

VERNOR-JUNCTION
AL - I.av oenu.t;y R.ea.1-dantu.l
RLM - t.aw-fltadiua oenaity Reaidential
RM - Madima e&gt;en.aicy R.eaidential
RH - High Denai ty IW•idential

• AC -

Speci&amp;l. Re•ident.ia.1-&lt;~rcia.1

INaT - tnati tutional
IND - c.enera.l 1nduat.rial

LT. IND - Light l.Dduacz-i&amp;l

• NCl• CI ll'UTUIIII•
• N • - L LANCI U ••

AaCCIMM
Q

MC - Major c ~ r c i a l

•c

-

spacial c ~ r c i a l

RLC - R••idential/1,oca.l ~rc.1-al
cac - Genaral ec-rc:ial
CC - CCllllpU'iaon ~ r c i a l

0

1 UICfrl I

1000ft

'h

~

=

-

......

MUSI - N1Jc.ed u- Re•idantial
Cl
0,,.,, Spac,o

• •

~ -

DIST - DUlt.ribat..i.on I.AduaC::Z"_ia.1

l.

Port

CIIM - ,,_.._
&lt;1:

s.. .6R2!D:Stia.... for explanation of cat:egori••

Vernor-Junction Subsector •.•.••.••• 309-11

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

III-131A

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

VERNOR-JUNCTION SUBSECTOR aopNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Vernor-Junction Subsector is generally bounded by West
Grand Boulevard on the east, the-Fisher Freeway on the south,
and the Conrail-Grand Trunk embankment on the northwest. On
the north, the Subsector goes up_to and includes the old Clark
Street Cadillac plant (now vacant). Well-known landmarks and
features include the Cadillac plant, along with Clark Park,
Western High School, Holy Redeemer Roman Catholic Church, and
the-Vernor-Junction commercial ~rea.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, VERNOR-JUNCTION SUBSECTOR

Neighborhoods near the industrial corridor (generally near or
north of Toledo Avenue)
have been showing
signs
of
deterioration. This area accounts for most of the Subsector's
housing-related problems and most of the Subsector's recent
population losses and demolition.
Many of the scattered, small industrial plants (whether in
operation or vacant) along the Grand Trunk and Conrail
railroads are directly adjacent to housing.
Whether or not
reoccupancy of the vacant plants should be encouraged is
questionable.
Other than
facilities;
possible.

Clark Park, the area is short of recreation
this need should be addressed to the extent

VERNOR-JUNCTION SUBSECTOR GOALS

This area has experienced considerable distress relating
mainly to the general decline in the manufacturing sector of
the City's economy.
The challenge now is to conserve and
revitalize viable industries and neighborhoods, remove what
is obsolete, and rebuild for the future with new growth
industries and housing developments which provide sound, safe
living areas near places of employment, convenient, attractive
shopping and adequate recreation opportunities.
POLICY 309-11:

Vernor-Junction Subsector Policies

Develop long-range plans for reindustr iali zation.
Provide
adequate buffering between industry and housing. Use zoning
to insure compatible land-use relations between existing
development and new construction, be it new industry near
existing housing or vice-versa.
Improve existing mixed-use
industrial and housing areas with landscaping.
Phase out
obsolete industrial facilities, especially where adjacent to
viable housing.
Provide improved recreation facilities
including neighborhood parks and a recreation center.
3/90

III-132

�HUBBARD-RICHARD
CDRKTDWN
EXISTING LAND UBE
RL - tov oenaity Meidenltial
s:ILM - Low-fledi1a Den•ity Raaidal'lU,&amp;l
l=IIM - Nediua D.nail:y J.uJ.dllnt.i•l
RH - Riqb Denaicy R••ident.ial.

• •c -

special M•idential-c~rc1al
INIIT .. tnati tutlan&amp;l.
IND - Geaaral Induczial.
LT. IND .. Li9bt InduaU1.al

DIST - Diat.rillut.ion todut.rial

MC - N&amp;jor c:c-rciaJ.

ac - special. ec-arcial
AI.C - lleaidaaUal/Loc:al ~rc:J.&amp;.1
QC • a...ral. ~ra.i,e,l

cc-.,_~~u1
MUIII - Niaad t19e aeeidanUal

oa- " - • -

SIOlll'T- krt
CIIM- c...c:ery

V or VAC - vacant
s - Appeftdix A far explanat.ion of cau9ori••

l.

1 ,ncf'I 12000n.

-

0
0.0

.25

.50

. 75

t.O

~~c:=::7
lulOfNter

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

HUBBARD-RICHARD
CDRKTDWN

•

•

u••

•

RaCCIMM NO CI
l"UTUR
ca N RAL. L.ANCI

• •

RL - Lev Den• ity Re • idantial

ALM - .t.,ow,-f,lediua oen• 1.ty Rea.identi&amp;l
AM - Mediua Denaicy Reaidant.ial
AH - High Oenaity RaaidantiaJ.

• ,.C INIIT
IND
LT. INC
DlaT

-

Special 1ta• 1.dential-C~rc.ial

Inatitutian&amp;l
General Induatr1.al

t.ight Incluauial
Di • t.n.bQtion Induac.r1.al

MC - Major c~c1.a.l ·
9C - Spacial C~rcial

RLC - Raaident1.al/Local ccaaarcial
cac - Gen.ral c~rc:ial
CC - Ccxiq:,,ar1.aon c~rcial

MUIII - Mi.xed u- Re • 1denc1&amp;l.

Oa -

Open Space

POSlt'T - Port

C • M - c-t.ary

S••

~

1-..

for explan• cion of c• ceqori••

1 lflCfl I ,o()C)ft .

=

0
½
i = = J~
i==---:J

o.o

5J-

.25

.50

.75

1.0

1

mole

c::::::r==1:::.-J,---,

··-

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Hubbard-Richard/Corktown Subsector 309-12

III-132A

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

HOBBARD-RICHARD/CORKTOWN SOBSKCroR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Hubbard-Richard/Corktown Subsector is generally bounded
by the Fisher Freeway on the -north, the Central Business
District on the east, the Detroit River on the south, and West
Grand Boulevard on the west. The Subsector is named after the
two residential neighborhoods that it includes.
Well-known landmarks, in addition to the former Amtrak train
station, include the Ambassador- Bridge, Riverside Park, St.
Anne's Roman Catholic Church, Ti-ger Stadium, and the MexicanAmerican commercial areas on Bagley and Vernor. The Jeffries
Freeway, bridge plaza, and truck routes greatly divide the
Subsector, and a major rail yard and rail ferry docking
facility occupy more than half of the Subsector's share of the
riverfront.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, HOBBARD-RICHARD/CORKTOWN SOBSECTOR

Much of the Hubbard-Richard/Corktown Subsector is part of a
development project (West Side Industrial #1 and #2, HubbardRichard, and Cork town), or else is considered a possible
development location by virtue of riverfront location or
proximity to the Central Business District.
Almost every
portion of this Subsector presents issues related to land use
or development.
Zoning issues tend to be more prominent and
important in this Subsector compared to elsewhere in the City.
Traffic problems are also present, particularly along Michigan
Avenue and Rosa Parks.
Truck traffic impacts residential
areas.
Preston Elementary School has recently closed. Children must
now cross the freeway or bridge plaza to attend Webster
School.
The Ambassador Bridge area has presented many issues as the
bridge plaza and associated public and private facilities are
in the middle of the Hubbard-Richard community and there are
numerous traffic and land use conflicts.
The fact that the
bridge is a major international truck route has contributed
to this condition.
The Federal Government has completed a
Customs inspection station for trucks, and private truck
terminals related to Bridge traffic are found at various
adjacent or nearby locations.
Current plans call for a
greatly expanded U.S. Customs service inspection area and an
expanded bridge plaza area.

3/90

III-133

�r

THE ·DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~JES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Automobile-oriented f.acili ties ._near the Bridge . include, or
will include:
duty-free shops and a proposed Michigan
Department of Transportation tourist information center.
The portion of the riverfront-west of Rosa Parks to the
Ambassador Bridge is prime area for redevelopment; however,
transportation infrastructure would have to be relocated and
this would be costly.
Immediately north of the Riverside Park is a potentially prime
development site with views of-the River.
Currently, that
land is vacant or in use fo-r light industry and truck
terminals.
The Michigan Avenue corridor, including the Tiger Stadium
area, is seen as a potential development site because of its
location near Corktown and the downtown area and along a major
thoroughfare ..
It is envisioned that the Michigan corridor
will be gradually upgraded with new development; deteriorated,
under-utilized, or inappropriate development will be replaced.
The presence of Tiger Stadium has long had an impact on the
surrounding community related to traffic, parking, and fan
disturbances. A major step toward relieving this problem was
the implementation of the resident parking program in 1987.
However, a need for further traffic and parking improvements
exists.
Infrastructure improvements are needed to alleviate
flooded streets, alleys and basements; provide better street
lighting; repair streets, alleys and sidewalks; and, replace
worn utilities.
Improvements are needed to provide more and
better open space.
Improved convenience shopping is also an
expressed need in certain parts of this Subsector.
A major issue underlying many of the problems in this area is
the loss of population that has occurred over the past two
decades. While this has been a problem for Detroit generally,
it is - acutely perceived here as the root cause of housing
abandonment and loss, declining levels of services, loss of
shopping
facilities
and
general
deterioration
of
the
community.
HUBBARD-RICBARD/CORKTOWN GOALS

The Hubbard-Richard/Corktown Subsector is an important and
valuable part of the City. Its rich and diverse history, mix
of population groups, important landmarks, economic activity,
proximity to
the downtown area,
and strong community
organization all combine to make this area truly unique.
Further, because of these features and because of growth that
3/90

III-134

�-

,-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:u:lES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

can be stimulated by -major ne~ developments including the
• Travel
Information
Center,
the
possibilities
for
the
revitalization of the Tiger Stadium area and the potential for
new industrial activity, this --Subsector is in a very good
position to make a major recovery. The goal is to achieve the
rehabilitation of the existing ~ommunity and preserving its
unique character while adding major new housing, shopping,
service, -and recreational facilities and economic development.
The following policies are designed to implement this goal.
POLICY 309-12:

Hubbard-Richard/Corktown Subsector Policies

Encourage population growth. Continue to build a good living
environment through the gradual removal of abrasive uses and
continued protection against nonconforming uses; buffering and
proper siting of new light industrial or transportationrelated facilities (such as the Bridge plaza), and continued
upgrading of housing.
Provide increased support and strengthening of the ethnic
commercial strip on Bagley, and support the expansion of this
commercial area along Bagley east of the Fisher Freeway.
Provide adequate parking for this area.
Encourage high-intensity residential/commercial development
to replace lower intensity and aging light industrial and
commercial properties, especially
north of Riverside Park,
along parts of the Michigan Avenue corridor through the
Subsector, and along part of Fort Street, especially near the
Central Business District.
Prevent the penetration of high
intensity development into Corktown south of the Michigan
Avenue frontage.
Consider long-range potential development
on part or all of the riverfront rail yards, utilizing air
rights over the tracks, if feasible.
Encourage infill housing where needed, and a new housing
development on the cleared parcel near St. Anne's Church.
Encourage
other
new
housing
at
appropriate
locations
throughout the area. Make every effort to provide new housing
in the Hubbard-Richard area prior to Bridge plaza expansion.
Consider manufactured as well as site built housing. Upgrade
alleys, sidewalks, curbs, utilities and public lighting to
contemporary standards. Consider a historic street lighting
program in the historic Corktown area.
Continue light
industrial development until the West Side Industrial #2
project is complete.
Resolve traffic conflicts:
provide better access from Fort
Street to the Ambassador Bridge plaza; downgrade Lafayette
3/90

III-135

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLu:lES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Avenue where it carries heavy - volumes of traffic through
, Hubbard-Richard; eliminate truck traffic from residential
streets; consider usi~g traffic signals (blinking lights) to
reduce noise levels from truck- traffic during low traffic
hours. Consider a special transportation link along Michigan
-Avenue to c~nnect the Downtown ~eople Mover system with the
Michigan Central Depot.
Provide a new public elementary school east of the Fisher
Freeway when warranted by populcftion increases. Prohibit the
blocking of West Grand Boulevard-at the entrance to Riverside
Park by trains.
Support social, recreational, and cultural
programs related to the needs of special groups including
immigrants, non-English speaking, the elderly, and the poor.
Promote the tourist potential of the Hubbard-Richard/Corktown
Subsector, focusing on such attractions as Tiger Stadium,
Riverside Park, historic neighborhoods, Mexicantown and ethnic
restaurants, St. Anne's Church, the Ambassador Bridge and
related facilities.
Insure that the proposed new Travel
Information Center gives adequate priority to promoting these
attractions in the immediate area.
Continue to study the feasibility of developing a pedestrianbicycle path connecting downtown to Fort Wayne, along West
Jefferson, West Lafayette, or some other route.
Encourage
increased coordination of the different community groups and
agencies working in this area.
"Market" the area as a good
place to live, work, and play.
Encourage the continuation of Tiger Stadium, either as a new
or rehabilitated facility, in its present location or close
proximity.
Provide adequate parking, and contain traffic,
parking, and other impacts to a designated area north of
Michigan Avenue. Develop and implement a traffic routing plan
for ball park traffic.
Encourage "theme-town'' shuttle buses
to and from the Stadium, and provide a bus containment area.
Encourage historic designation for the area generally bounded
by 14th Street, Bagley, Rosa Parks, and the Fisher Freeway.
Upgrade outdoor open space in the Most Holy Trinity Plaza and
playlot areas, Dean Savage Park, Mulliet Park, St. Vincent
School open field, and Roosevelt Park. Create a new "pocket"
park on existing open space at Leverette and Tenth.

3/90

III-136

�-

r
SPRINGWELLS

EXISTING! LAND U

AL-

......~
i ! I
!·i- I~
i
!= I
i ! I

l1ND

-

--4-C

RL•

l! :•

•

AH-1114'...,_&lt;Y~
IND

•M

••-----1 ~-

.

••~f'..
a.• •LM
r.. ~
; ....~ •-/
• •
INICI

...

:

·-•~

i.

RLM

••••-••-•--•••••:

l

:

;::

i:

-

~

Ce mc 1e:'f

l

RM

: '._

: INCi

: :
....

. __ _

_/

i ./. -.

: :

~

s

r--·...•·. ,
ALM

:

,,.•

:.,•

mc-a.-ai.a-d&amp;l

:

cc-~-

M'--"Nl-'lloo~

aa-_,__.

POAT--.c
C

• M-,,__,,

•

:--:r""

~

••· ..

JIN~...• ~

.J ••-:: .

Il

1
1

• c:-9p0Ci&amp;la-d&amp;l

INDI

:

RL M

--~
--~IND- a..ra1 IncLatri.al

L"I: I NG- 1J4,t IncLatri.al
01 • T - - -

·-

...

: :

I

Woocmere

~

Dlnli&lt;Y ~

• AC-!lpKi&amp;l~--.:ial
I N • T- InatituUaM.l

IND

•-~,
.~
.
.
.
JI
!
·----:__..----·--= -~ ,- ~--··
~ ---~=-= _:;C;.:...;;;~-,;.:r= .=.--. ....... ~ - ··•·.

I,

Dlnli&lt;v

~ ~ O.W.ty ~

'
/..
• /.;■ -✓
"'''

t

to,

A'-M- -

:

••

•••••j~_::·
!'- . .(-

._J.··.,: .

..•••·· ..,.~ . .+;

..... -

.

1-~

t

1f'ICfil

@.....

' 2000ft .

"1

0

1

r==
.....

r==7

I

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

SPRINGWELLS

•

•

•

Aae0MM NC C
.. UTUIII
Q N
RAL LANC U

• •

••

RL - Low e&gt;enaity Re • i.dantial

IIILM - t.aw-tiMdiua o.naity Re • i.4-ltial

"M -

Medilm Denaity ,.._identi.al

AM - Biqh Denaiey M • idenU.al

• AC -

Speci&amp;.l Re • i.d.ential-C~rc.ial

INaT - tnatitutiOl'\&amp;.l
INC - Genaral. Indu.atri • l
LT. IND - Light. I.ndu• u:i.a.l
OlaT - Di • t.rillution loduat.rial

MC - Major c ~rei&amp;l
ec - special c~rcb.l
Rt.C - R••identia l/t.oc:&amp;.l c..c::...arcial

CIC
CC
MUR
Oa
POlll'T

- General. C~rci.al
- coapari•on c~rcial
- Mixed OM Re•:a.dential
- Open Space
- Port

caM - c...tary

.-woocmere

Ce met~ · r

S•• Appendix A tor -.xpl.anation. of cateqoriea

ll.

1 lflC" I 2000ft .

.....

0
0 .0

.25

.so

75

,.o

··-

.....

c.:=:::F='~
SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Springwells Subsector •••••••••••••• 309-13

III-136A

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN .OF POLICIES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

SPRINGWELLS SUBSECTOR BOONDARIES...AND FEATURES

The Springwells Subsector is generally bounded by the Dearborn
City limit and Woodmere Cemetel!'-y on the west, the ConrailGrand Trunk railroad embankment on the southeast, and
Conrail's junction yards on the-north.
North of Dix Highway, virtually all of the land is in rail
yards and other heavy industry. South of Dix is residential,
except for the Vernor-Springwerls commercial area and some
industry along the Grand Trunk. -Patton Park is the best-known
feature other than those mentioned above.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, SPRINGWELLS SUBSECTOR

One-story bungalows on small lots are one of the more common
housing types in Springwells. These homes, now 60 years old
or so, are in need of concentrated maintenance.
Thus far,
the degree of maintenance, overall, is very satisfactory.
There is a degree of conflict ( or a lack of separation)
between industry and homes in the Springwells Subsector,
particularly in regard to truck traffic.

-

The industrial area between Dix and the Junction yards
provides very little employment, considering the land area
consumed.
It is one of the largest sites in Detroit that
could be assembled with very little relocation for jobproducing industrial development.
Springwells includes Conrail's intermodal yard and many other
transport facilities.
This makes the Subsector an ideal
location for food industries currently occupying cramped
facilities, or inappropriate locations such as residential
streets.
Being close to major southwest and Downriver
pollution
sources,
Spr ingwells
is
deeply
affected
by
environmental problems.
SPRINGWELLS SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Springwells Subsector is a community closely tied to the
industrial heart of the City and should remain so. The goal,
therefore, is to insure that the area becomes as increasingly
sound and attractive residential community, close to places
of employment but shielded from undesirable impacts from
nearby industries.

III-137

3/90

-

-

- ----~--~

-------

----- -

�-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIQES

POLICY 309-13:

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Springwells Subs.ector Policies

No significant · chan-g es in land use and- only minor zoning
changes are recommended for the-Springwells Subsector. Take
measures to further stabilize the Springwells community
through such programs as the commercial area project.
Increase efforts toward housing conservation, infill housing,
and more housing for seniors. Closely scrutinize the existing
multiple housing stock during the coming years to see what
sorts of programs may be needed to insure its survival, if
problems develop.
Consider food processing and distribution as a labor-intensive
industry to develop in this Subsector.
Provide better bus service in the Spr ingwells Subsector.
Improve enforcement of environmental protection measures.

-

III-138

3/90

-

-

--

-

- -

----

�CHADSEY

.✓xi..........

.....---•~······

_.,.•.. ••

~

I/
//

I

/ ~:::•• .;t..:
•

1Na

EXISTING! LAND USE
•••••

ALM

··-.....

I

]

:

:

---rN~-1= .

r~~"&gt;&lt;-~. "'~~~:. . _. . . .
......
:

:

:.• :.. :.. Fi,i
:•

: - - : ALM

::

:

I

r··

i 1··:

j .'" -

:.....:

.
:

INC

--..;

---•••• •

c •

-.....

' ·"•;:,:::-----------

ALM

•••••

•

INST- J:nacibJl:.l,:,nol
IND-c..nJ.IncblUi,a,J.
L."l:IND-Wqt,tizd.attl&amp;l

ALM

: -: - - •

k . ~-~-==-

RH- Hi¢ Dma1ty i.idlnu&amp;.L

• RC-~~~

,•

: INDii•••

ALM

..•• .

-~RLM

INC

· · •. . .

--cc--~
----~

CIIST---.ui&amp;l

=-

• c.oi-,1.ala-,d.&amp;l

RL.C-

.

aa..._,...,.

:

PCAT- Port
C • M-a..tmy

xac

-~---of-

' -~!

••••

:

••••

••••~••'• ••

-,

~:R&amp;.M

~ a-,d.&amp;l

me-__,_ a-,d.&amp;l

•••••• - •••

! - - - ·- ,

~

~Mldi.mDlnm.ey~

•

:1_.. .•ac
:____

0

'•:.

RL.- to, Cmaity

R&amp;.M----.-,,~

••••,

IND

:•

...,t.'· •••

fNG

J

- .;. __ IND.L-•
.

,

'
._; ~ .

1-..

1 lftCPI

1

2000ft .

.....

0
0.0

JS

SO

75

1.0

,.,., ..

c:=:::f==1=::::..J,------,
ll.16offletet"
SOUTHWEST SECTOR

-

CHADSEY

R

• cCIMM• NCl• D fl'UTUR •
ca• N • R"AL. L.ANCI u ••

RL - Low Den•1.ty

Re • ict.ntial.

ALM - ~ i a Den • ity 1taai.dent1&amp;1
IIIM - Medi.ta DenaJ..ty Re • identi&amp;.l.
IIIIH • Biqh Denaity Reaidantial

• AC -

Special Reaidential-C~rci.al

INaT - tutit.utional

INC
LT. IND
DtaT
MC

- General lnduat.ria.l
- Light tnduatn.al
- Oi.n.ribut.ion I.nduauial

- Major C~rci&amp;l

9C - Spacial CC-rc1.al

RLC - R••l.d•neial/Loca1 ~rc:1.al

cac -

C..neral Cc:maercial

CC -

Ccmp&amp;%l. •

on C~rcia.l

MU• - Mixed U•• R• • :a.CWne1.al

Oa - Opan Sp&amp;~

POAT - Port

CIIM - c-e•ry

S••

Appendix A tor •xplanaeion ot c:aeeqori••

1-..

1 1,w;f'I r 1000ft .

.....

0

o.o

.25

.so

.75

1.0

··-

mt . .

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Chadsey Subsector •...•......•...... 309-14

III-138A

�,,

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLigES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

CHADSEY SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND. FEATURES

The Chadsey Subsector boundaries are Warren Avenue on the
north, LiverROis on-the east, t~e Conrail main rail line on
the south, and the Dearborn city limit on the west.
The Subsector is residential and industrial.
It is bisected
by the Edsel Ford Freeway and. Michigan Avenue.
Notable
features include Chadsey High School, the old DeSoto plant
(now a Chrysler parts plant), large truck terminals, and other
heavy industry at the southern- edge of the Subsector, and
numerous ethnic churches.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, CHADSEY SUBSECTOR

The advancing age, small size, and wood-frame construction of
the typical Chadsey Subsector house suggests a need for City
attention in the future.

-

Lack of separation of industrial uses from residences
is a problem here.
While the pattern of industrial and
residential land in Chadsey is not as chaotic as in other
parts of southwest Detroit, there are areas of conflict,
notably the industrial pocket northwest of the intersection
of Martin and McGraw.
In some cases, buff er ing is needed
between industry and housing.
In other cases, relocation of
industry to other sites within Detroit may be appropriate.
A review of the zoning is needed to eliminate some of the
conflicts.
Active conservation of homes, support of local businesses,
and downzoning of certain commercial streets and fringe
industrial areas will help insure that Chadsey will remain a
viable and livable community.
The basic housing strategy
starts with the fact that the single and multiple housing is
overwhelmingly owner-occupied and in good condition. The same
housing, though, is small, wood frame, and 60 to 70 years old,
on small lots.
With few exceptions, the current housing
should be retained.
CHADSEY SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Chadsey Subsector is a residential community closely
integrated with the City's network of industrial corridors.
The goal is to conserve and enhance existing housing,
preserving its character and providing adequate separation
and buffering from adjacent industrial uses and impacts.

III-139

3/90

-1

-

---

--

-----

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POI:,IQES
POLICY 309-14:

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

Chadsey Subsectar Policies

Provide a program of active housing conservation and support
of local businesses. Downzone Sti-rplus or obsolete commercial
and industrial land.
Explore more labor-intensive industries for under-utilized
sites such as the scrap yards or portions of the Chrysler
property.
Explore ways to remove truck tra~fic from affected residential
streets.
Ultimately, provide a higher degree of separation
between industrial and residential land uses.

3/90

III-140

�-..,

FAR WEST
RIVERFRONT
• Xl• TING

LAND U

••

----t:y~

l

INIST- InKitl&amp;ia,&amp;l.
ING--1~

MC---

-~ac-~-

i

2000fl.

"''----~

~--

-

0

CIC- - 1 o-d&amp;l

""----ty~

"'-m..,-ty~
-~_...__,,.,.,
INIST--1-.-,........._.

1 ....

L.,:IND-U.,.lldau&gt;&amp;l
DIIST---...1.

o.o

cc-~-

.25

.so

PORT--.C

C

• M-c=--,,

.75

,.o '"'..

··-

'----'r::=::1'--~•r==-,

M..-111-'-~

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

,-

/

'

FAR WEST
RIVERFRONT
RL - t.ow 0ent11.ey a. • idancial
ll=IILM - Low-Mediua o.n • ity Reei.denU&amp;l
AM - Mediua Den.aity Re • ida.n cial
AH - BiCJh Den.ei ty Reaidential
...C - Special ReaidenUal-c~rc.ull
INaT - tuUt.uUCID&amp;l.

IND - CJeneral Inda.atri&amp;l
L.T. IND - I.J.9h&lt; InduaUial
~ - D~tzi.btia~ ~ ~ • l

•

•

•

911 COMM ND CI
~UTU"'
Cl N RAL. L.ANCI U

• •

••

•

MC - Major c~reial
ac - special. cc-.re1aJ.
RLC - Reai.denUal/Loc:&amp;l 0 - r c i a l

me -

l.

1 UICft I 2000fl.

.....

0

General CC-.rcial

CC - ce.paruoa ccaaarcial

o.. Ae • Mlenua.l
aa-0panspace

MUR - Mixad

POIIIT-lPOft
CIIM- c-cary

.25

.50

. 75

1.0

··-

,,.. ..

~

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

West Riverfront Subsector ••••••..•• 309-15
--------

0.0

-

III-140A

�. THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~IES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

WEST RIVERFRONT SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES
The West Riverfront Subsector is generally bounded by the
Detroit River, the Rouge River,-the Fisher Freeway, and West
Grand Boulevard.
The West Riverfront Subsector is primarily nonresidential and
displays great complexities in land issues. Heavy industry,
rail and port facilities, and heavy utilities such as two
electric-power· generating plants, and the region's main
sewerage treatment plant dominate the subsector. Residential
uses (several neighborhoods collectively known as Delray) are
surrounded by industry.
Major features and landmarks are listed in a generally east
to west order:
the Port of Detroit, the City's Mistersky
power plant, Fisher Body Ternstedt Plant, historic Fort Wayne,
the Detroit Edison plant, Allied Chemical, Southwestern High
School, Union Produce Terminal, the Fisher Body Fleetwood
Plant, Peerless Cement, the sewerage treatment plant, a salt
mine, and Woodmere Cemetery.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, WEST RIVERFRONT SUBSECTOR
The West Riverfront includes southwest Detroit's major
industrial corridor.
As such, it will be the location for
many of Detroit's reindustrialization activities.
Vacant
industrial plants and vacant industrial land are already
available for expansion of industries.
In certain areas,
industrial corridors can be expanded into marginal residential
pockets.
An expanded district steam system for heating and
industrial processes is another potential development tool.
One very important planning issue is the future of Delray as
a residential community.
The City advocates retention of
Delray as a community, including housing, schools, churches,
the health center, and commercial and retail services. Many
changes may be needed.
In Delray, the general "goal II of
accommodating reindustrialization within existing industrial
corridors is not entirely feasible because of the current
intermixtures of land uses.
Port improvements are related to changing port functions and
the Foreign Trade Zone ( FTZ) •
Large-scale expansion of
berthing space is unneeded unless current trends completely
reverse.
However, the Foreign Trade Zone and the container
barge operations creates a need for warehouse, outdoor
storage, and container handling spaces. Much of this activity
will occur inland from (north of) Jefferson Avenue.
3/90

- III-141

�r

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

THE DETROI.fl!.,,MASTER PLAN OF POLU:IES
I

WEST RIVERFRONT SUBSECTOR GOAL~
Because of the importance of this area to the industrial
economic base of the City, the ehallenge here is to allow the
operation and expansion of industry while retaining a viable
residential community. The future should see this area with
sound, comfortable neighborhoods built upon the existing
residential
base,
served
with
adequate
shopping,
entertainment, and community facilities but structured so as
to coordinate with the healthy-growth of Detroit's reviving
and evolving industrial base.

POLICY 309-15:

West Riverfront Subsector Policies

In order for Delray to survive as a residential community,
give encouragement to all needed community support systems:
shopping,· schools, recreation, etc. Rehabilitate or replace
housing as needed.
Improve air quality.
Protect housing in the Delray community against industry by
changing the zoning of the edges of industrial corridors near
residences from M4 to M2.
Rezone scattered housing pockets
in areas more suitable for industrial use to Transitional
Industrial (TM).
Develop Fort Wayne as a major waterfront recreational
resource, making up for the shortage of major recreational
attractions in southwest Detroit. Develop a recreational and
commuter pedestrian-bicycle path between Fort Wayne and the
Central Business District.
Provide for selected expansion of port facilities
implementation of Foreign Trade Zone activities.

and

the

Encourage older industrial establishments which continue to
prosper or which will be needed in the future to remain:
included in this category are all freight transportation
facilities, the food processing and distribution industry,
and all industries related to the port or using water for
transportation.
Exploit the current or potential tourist attractions of the
West Riverfront to the fullest: Fort Wayne, Delray, the salt
mines, and the industrial corridors.

3/90

III-142

�I

I

BO VNTON

l!XISTING LAND

I
I

ua•

----

IIIL- tot DIOOity ~
1 1 1 1 . M - - .....t y ~
IIIH-

ty~

Ri_, ,,.,.,_

ty - 1 &amp; 1

• IIIC--=1A!~~
•

IN T- Inal:itueial&amp;l

INCl--:tn,uu1a.1
L.T.IND-!J4&gt;1:Indu1Ui&amp;l.

•

Cll T - -

~

--~
cc---MC--a-dal

~-=1Al-

-----

cac--.la-dal

~

Cla-oi,m .....
IIIDAT--.

C

!0&lt;--ot-

• M-c..t,ory

ti]

: 1000ft.

-

"2

0

,
.....

~

--

.50

. 75

,.o

'-----'
luto,Nte,

SOLJTHWEST

SECTOR

I

BO VNTON

R • CCIMM• N Cl• CI
Q

•

l'IUTUIII
L.ANCI

• N • -L.

u ••

~

AL - t.ow oenai cy Reaid.nt.ial
I I I L M - ~ i - Denaity . . ai.den.Ual
~M-Medi\a Dena ity baadent.i&amp;l

•

AH - !l19h

-C
INll'T
IND
L.T. INCi

ClaT' MC8C ALC CIC •

o.n• ity

Re • 1.dant.ial

S~i•l Re aidant.ial~~rcia.l
tnat.it.u1:.ion&amp;l
Genera.l. I nd.uacrial
Light tndwl trial
D1•trillllt. ion Indu • crial
Kajor c ~ CJ.al .

Special C~rc1.al
R.eal.denu al/LocaJ. c~rci&amp;l.
General C~rc:ial
CC - C ~ i a on cc:...rcial
MUA - Milwd UM Re • id.ent.ial
08 .. Open Space

SICAT - Po~
ca:M- c-ury

r expi..n.t.ion of eauqori••

~

11M:t'I

/l~.ft

I

ti]

100()fl .

-.....
,

"2

0

~

o.~

·~

~

.50

·soLJTHW EST

Boynton Subsector •••••••••••••••••• 309-16
----

---------------

-------------

.75

1.0

··-

'-----'

SECTOR

III- 142A
~

�F

-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:tgES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

BOYNTON SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES ANO FEATURES

The Boynton Subsector consists of that part of Detroit beyond
(or southwest of) the Rouge Riv-e-r.
It borders the cities of
River Rouge, Ecorse, Lincoln Park, and Melvindale by land
boundaries; Detroit and Dearborn lie across the Rouge River
boundary.
Boynton includes heavy industry, and its residential districts
find themselves within a mile-or two of large industrial
complexes such as National Steel in Ecorse, the Ford Rouge
plant in Dearborn, or the Marathon Oil refinery, which is
within the subsector.
This is a much newer part of the City.
Only 19 percent of
the residential structures were built before 1925, as compared
with 36 percent for the City as a whole.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, BOYNTON SUBSECTOR

The factor which may be most er i ti cal to Boynton is the
economic decline of the Downriver region of southwest
Michigan. Many Boynton residents are employees of Downriver
chemical, steel, and automobile plants, or else are on layoff
or pension. Unless Downriver recovers, Boynton will share the
economic difficulties.
BOYNTON SUBSECTOR GOALS

This area is closely related to the Downriver industrial
conglomerate. The future should see this area prosper as new
industries evolve from the old.
Residential neighborhoods
such as Boynton will become increasingly desirable as
attractive balanced communities within close proximity to a
wide range of employment opportunities.
POLICY 309-16:

Boynton Subsector Policies

Take measures to maintain and protect neighborhoods by
cleaning up or buffering the industrial and commercial land
uses, and promote an increased intensity of commercial and
industrial development.
In the more solid residential area
(particularly the area south of the Wabash Railroad), provide
normal services.
Implement housing conservation programs in
areas that are seeing signs of housing neglect or aging.
Work toward developing reciprocal agreements with the Ecorse
and River Rouge city governments to provide services.
3/90

III-143

�I

--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL!l:IES

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

On south Fort S~reet, which was never fully developed as a
, general business district, high-density housing and a small
convenience goods shopping center.
Encourage housing and
neighborhood-scale commercial -Eievelopment on portions of
Schaefer and Oakwood.

3/90

III-144

�I

-·-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL!gES

WEST SECTOR

ARTICLE 310
WEST SECTOR

WEST SECTOR LOCATION AND EXTENTThe West Sector is bounded generally by Southfield, the
Jeffries Freeway, Ardmore, and the Union Belt Railroad line
on the east, and includes everything to the west of this line
located within the City limits.
The entire area is located
in what is often referred to as the "outer city", and was
among the last portions of the City to become developed urban
area.
The 1980 Census counted 189,588 people in the West Sector,
making it the largest sector in the City in population. The
area is divided into seven geographic subsectors:
Redford,
Evergreen, Rosedale, Brightmoor, Cody, Rouge, and Brooks.
WEST SECTOR PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS
The physical condition of much of the housing, commercial, and
industrial development in the West Sector is generally good,
a reflection of the fact that much of the area developed after
World War II and is one of the newer parts of Detroit.
The West Sector has the potential to continue to be one of
Detroit's most popular areas for family living.
It offers a
wide variety of substantial single-family and apartment
housing, a very generous amount of recreation facilities, and
good accessibility to downtown and suburban shopping and
employment.
POLICY 310-1:

West Sector - land use

Encourage development proposals that take advantage of unique
features such as the Rouge Valley ( observing flood plain
development constraints), Telegraph Road and Eight Mile Road.

3/90

III-145

�I

WEST SUBSECTORS

I~

EVERGREEN

Ii

~-I---J------1--..:':..:":!'":,_--t-----1 . '_l ~ E c F o R c

~

' i~

. ,. ' -1
;·

~
:

ROSEDALE

""""' •
!;,...---..:1:~.........
....----~,~_:.~~-+_..:j

-

BRIGHTMDCR

~

~ ___,

,~
,

T

'

, ... , (X\lof

~

0

•

-

'\C)O(l('l(CA•rr

;

--

_.J.

j

,I

,;

·~1---.. ~ ~~:~~.~ - ·(, . ~.

--

, .~

~~

j

cao nn
"'1

, - . . - - - - · ..

'

.

:.JI!!! ii!I

---~!, -

P'\.YUOUTH

(

"'

:. ·-,~ l-•j

RO)UGE --·1- ~.;.";;:.:"':.:;";;;;
••~r -

·· ~ ~..,"-,
--•
1

~ ~

-1~--.1,.----,-,-..:w;;.;•"..:"'.;;."-111llr-----.- '

:,_ L

it.~··
WEST

Brightmoor Subsector ............•.. 310-9
Brooks Subsector •...•..••......•.•. 310-12
Cody Subsector •.••..•......•.....•. 310-10
Evergreen Subsector •••.•.•...•..•.• 310-7
Redford Subsector .•••••••.••......• 310-6
Rosedale Subsector ......••........• 310-8
Rouge Subsector •.••...•............ 310-11

1 lncfl; • 4000

rt

SECTOR

�GENERALJZED

REZONING CONCEPT
city limit s

r--

- - -,

I

I
I .,

:!

I

e,''f.

,.

I

TELEGRAPH I
~: ~ - -

~1'
"'
w

-_:- -=---_:-.,, _____
-- --_. ,-,--"'

~

I

7

~

::l
'f. I

:?!

~

,.,1
I

,;;

.,,
,.

- - - -'

city limits
~

- - -c ~_,-r,' -~--::-_

,,

(

- ....

?1

-_ri - -

I _'f._l
I I
I I
I I
(.f)
I I rn

~----..-\;:I?!!

I-

I

/

,1

'-.,. -

.~

,,,"'II
I I

I

. .,,
. "'

DRIVE

7J

'

-&lt;
,::

,..,,

F
0

I"'

~

0

:&lt;
I

I

I

---

I
I
I
I

..."'

I

I

I

I~

~
-0
p,

C
,-

I~

I 1'.z
I

I

I

~-!...,?

I I,.,

:?!

I~

1!!

I!:"

.
.

le..

I I~

!
,..

I If

-

F

;:a

0

•

I 11:l

..J

;::
0

I

r1

I

I

r'

I

n

I

Bl

RESTRICTED BUSINESS
LOCAL BUSINESS/RESIDENTIAL
SHOPPING DISTRICT
GENEFIAL BUSINESS
GENEFIAL SERVICES

82
83
84
86

F

"'

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

..

SOI

•~'~r'

----------~
-----,

.1

1!!

M3
M4

MS

L.._I

..,

Ml
M2

1 'f.

11

I
~I

~

'-f

UMrTED INDUSTRIAL
RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
INTENSNE INDUSTRIAL
SPECIN.. INDUSTRIAL
SPECIN. DEVELOPMENT
(resident/al, wllh limited cammerc/al)

SPECIN. DEVELOPMENT
lcommerc/al,wllh limited resldM//a/J
S04 PROPOSED SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
RNERFRONT MIX USE

S02

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PUBUC CENTER
/'CA RESTRICTED CENTRAL BUSINESS
TM TRNISrTIONAL INDUSTRIAL
WI WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL
PD
PC

PR

PNIKS and RECREATION

1-'.!

:?!

I I

I::

:?!

I

&lt;
rn

-1
I 1 .. 1,.

SOUTHFIELD FWY.

I

DJ

0
;:a

~

.._ 1°'1
1/
I

1,.j

~·
I

I

I

'-l

I I

1!!

~

O

_,

r "'

!'!I
~

.,

z

1!!

'f.

'

;,&lt;

r
r

rn

I I

0

'-'----

z

I I
I I

~

;:a

I I
I I

rn

'f.'
:?!

rI

1e
1,.,

-l

----71-'r-

C:

r'
1!!

lh
I I~

I

I

I ,::

rn

LASHER

I

,.,

;:a

0
C
-l
I

'f.

SINGLE-F Ml/LY RESIDENTIAL
TWO-FAM/LY RESIDENTIAL
LON-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
THOROUGHFARE RES/DENTIN.
MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
/flGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

C,

z
::s:
r

I I
I I
I I

I I

~

I rn

&lt;
rn

1!!

,Y

;:a

,°'r

:::

I,

,,&gt; ' II

I I
I

.;

r,.

RI
112
113
114
115
116

I ~J

I

I

,.
o.

I

I

-,.- I
_o.._ J

,f

IJ

I l'f_

l-'
I

:?!

I
I
I

'I:!

1--

I

I

:?!
~I 11:J
IY
I I

:?!

'f.1 I
\J

I

WEST SECTOR

�r

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~JES
POLICY 310-2:

WEST SECTOR

West Sector - re.sidential development

Encourage apartment development for senior citizens. Increase
the range of housing choices. Eaeourage self-help maintenance
of housing.
Upgrade the image of public housing.
Identify
and immediately correct any indications of blight.

POLICY 310-3:

West Sector - commercial development

Improve major thoroughfare reta~l but phase out obsolete and
excess commercial frontage aoo convert to off-street parking,
residential, or other appropriate uses. Landbank thoroughfare
frontage parcels to help create attractive parcels for
development.
Support revitalization of business areas,
especially Old Redford,
Joy-Greenfield,
and Brightmoor
shopping centers.
Consider rezoning portions of
the
commercial frontage from B4 (General Business) to a more
restrictive classification.

POLICY 310-4:

West Sector - transportation system

Continue to refine the existing street system.
Consider
closing some streets to through traffic.
Provide better
coordinated traffic signalization.
Improve pedestrian and
bicycle circulation utilizing resources such as the Rouge
Valley Park system, Outer Drive, Hines Drive, and other major
parks.

POLICY 310-5:

West Sector - recreation system

Maximize the use of established recreation resources in the
West Sector.

3/90

III-146

�...

l!ir~;---\.:~..J -

·--···•/.:
GC

...

Cl• N • IIIAUZ8D

E&lt;IIITING LANO•&amp;.ma

00

.r:;;1.,..

°L-

RL

RL

·:

.. .
RL

:

AND

RL

~AF

.

LANOU-

RL-,__.,,_

~NST

-lJ s"fFr..:.L::=

RLM

REDFORD

RLM•--RM•---""RH---.cy__...

SRC--..,. . . - . - . ; . ,
INST -

1not1--1

IND-a..a.1......,...

LXIND-.....,.......,...

MC--sc.-..,..,_.,,..,,

GC---

RLC-...--a-,,w

ce--POS--•-•v-vacant

MUR•---CEM

..........__~ ....
CEM·--,

*• Puyf1"ld

. .. ......
..
:

ei

MCNI CHOLS

r~

:

iRL

i,.

RL
GC

I)

IND--U,..;

t

_J,

\

••

.

.
......

----

. . . ~ , _ ~ ~ . , . . . . . . .i.e.

AA
lL .....

1/93

n
cu

1 Inch • 2000 ft .

• ere,

RL

r

0.0

\ \,.9::GC~--J

.2.5

.50

,--,

III-146A

1.0

,---,

WEST SECTOR

.01-12

Redford Subsector •••••.••••.••.•••• 310-6

.75

mUe

�r

-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLU:IES

WEST SECTOR

REDFORD SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES -AND FEATURES

The Redford subsector is bounded by Eight Mile Road, Lahser,
Fenkell, Dale, Puritan, and -Pive Points.
The area is
developed primarily with single-family homes, supporting
services, and major recreation -and institutional uses.
The
1980 population of the subsector was 24,494.
Housing in the Redford Subsector is in generally good to
excellent condition.
The crccasional vacant or poorly
maintained building is the exception and does not detract from
the overall attractiveness of these neighborhoods.
The Redford Subsector lost 15 percent of its population
between 1970-1980, which is less than the City-wide percent
but high for the West Sector.
The Rouge River winds through the Redford Subsector, from
Eight Mile Road on the north to its southern boundary,
Fenkell.
Much of the land along the Rouge is subject to
flooding, when the River is forced to handle excessive amounts
of storm or thaw run-off and sewer flow. The potential flood
hazard limits · the development options for the area and makes
recreation open space a very practical use for this area.
The Redford Subsector includes a wide variety of commercial
uses, with conditions ranging from good to excellent in many
locations, to poor in a few specific locations.
The Redford Subsector includes a limited amount of industry
located along Dale, north of Fenkell. The area is bounded on
the east by City-owned property that is subject to flooding
from the Rouge River.
Existing industries seeking to expand
here should be encouraged to make greater use of the land
along Telegraph.
REDFORD SUBSECTOR GOALS

This is one of the more attractive and sound residential areas
of the City, and the primary goal is to maintain and enhance
the already desirable character of the area.
POLICY 310-6:

Redford Subsector Policies

Encourage the development
Edgewater Park site.

of

apartments

on

the

former

Continue to improve the Rouge Park system and the Rogell Golf
Course for recreation use.
3/90

III-147

�....

---

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIJ:lES

WEST SECTOR

Review policies for the frontage along major east-west
• thoroughfares.
Encourage local commercial and apartment
development along Fenkell, McNichols, ~nd Seven Mile Road.
Protect residentiaL areas from abrasive general commercial
uses along Eight Mile, Telegraph, and Grand River.
Protect and maintain the Old Redford district as an important
community resource.

3/90

III-148

�EVERGREEN

--- u-

E&lt;IIITING LAND . . . .
PRC'"""

GC
GC

......................-·-•••····

·······

.

RLM•---RM•--tyRH-...,-.ty_,..

••-••--: POS :

a:

"''"

~a:

RL

I

a:

~

INST-x-.-.-

:

:
:
--·---·-:
• :•
"
,....:

;%;

SRC--..----

. * :.
:······:
:

L.AN0

RL·,---

······················-···········-··
. .
······INST

-n

IND---....
U:IND-1.14&amp;-....

MC---

Q
..J

GC---

~
u..

RL

SC--.....iRLC---

...:::,

:::

'"~

"

0

cc---

fJl

MUR·----

POS--&amp;-•V•v.-cant

c---

CEM·-,.

*• Playf1-W

~~ ~ ~

e,

... .lalMl&amp;

.-------,
: INST
:

:'--···-'
* :

RL

RL

-

! INST

W

GC
~•:.:;. . .;,

...

::

Outer

Or

1

AA

RLC

GC

l1"°''"

1/83

• CNI

,------, =

.25

.so

c::::::::::.

.7S
c:_:j

3. 02-13

III-148A

1.0

··-

WEST SECTOR

Evergreen ·Subsector •.••••••••.•••.. 310-7

·

LJ
ClJ

1 1nc11 ,2000 n .

0.0

.

r ... H p 1 - u - at e • ~ 1 -

. ,.

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:u:IES

WEST SECTOR

... . .... --~.EVERGREEN SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Evergreen ~bsector is bounded by Eight Mile Road,
Southfield Freeway, McNichols Read, and Lahser. The area is
developed primarily with single-family homes, and supporting
shopping and services. The 1980 population of Evergreen was
35,722 persons.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, EVERGREEN SUBSECTOR

The Evergreen Subsector includ~s several of Detroit's most
popular neighborhoods for families raising children.
It is
quite stable - the area lost no housing uni ts and only 5
percent of its population between 1970 and 1980. The housing
stock is relatively new, most built after World War II.
Some deterioration of commercial frontage, especially along
Seven Mile east of Evergreen, is occurring.
Of particular
concern to residents are the vacant gas stations which have
been adapted to other commercial uses incompatible with
surrounding development.
EVERGREEN SUBSECTOR GOALS

The Evergreen Subsector is one of the more desirable sections
of the City as a family 1 iv ing area.
The primary goal is
maintenance and conservation of the sound neighborhoods and
commercial areas. The future of this area is as a residential
community, with stabilized, attractive commercial areas
balanced with the needs of the surrounding neighborhoods.
POLICY 310-7:

Evergreen Subsector policies

Maintain and preserve the area for family living.
Encourage additional apartment development in the Seven MileLahser area.
Protect residential areas from abrasive general commercial
uses along major traffic arteries.
Encourage more local commercial and residential development
along portions of the Seven Mile Road frontage.

3/90

III-149

�..-

ROSEDALE

caaN• ........alla

.......

.

j*

~
W

~
-

PROP! WffD

(a ••

! ,1
----~~
P:

0

U-

IIXl8TING LAN0 Lall

··•.....
·•.'•••••
INST
RL

==:

Puritan

.

Q

••

0

••••••

...3:

_,

0

•••

w
ii:

:r:

I-

::,
0

~

w

CZ:

MC- Majer a:amd.&amp;l
SC-Spoc:,.&amp;l.~
RLC-~~
GC--..i~

rJl

"'w RL
CZ:

&gt;

w

cc---

SENKEU

RL
RL

.AN0

RL- 1o, -r:y RLM•--,:y~
RM---cy~
RH- Ki-t&gt; Donoitv SRC- Spoc:,.&amp;l. ~ « - r c w
INST- 1tu1c&gt;bl&lt;ial01
IND--....LJ: IND- u~ Irdl.ui&amp;l

•
RL

1

MUR•---

RL

POS· ....._~ -

.

~l
L ndon

v- Vacant

•-

CEM-~

*- PlayfiA.14
. . . . . . . . . apa •• d Land U..
~
Change - • •
1/83

Rt

AA
lb".,..
RAFT

•

0.0

.25

.50

.15

1.0

~r::::::,~
kl-

WEST

SECTOR

3.03-12

Rosedale Subsector ••••••••••••••.•• 310-8

n
cu
..-

1 IM:tl • 2000 " ·

III-149A

...,.

�....

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

WEST SECTOR

ROSEDALE SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AHO FEATURES

The Rosedale subsector is bounded by McNichols, the Southfield
Freeway, Schoolcraft, Grandvill~Lyndon, Kentfield, Fielding,
Puritan, and Lahser.
The area is developed primarily with
larger single-family homes, general and local commercial uses,
and supporting services, including schools, recreation areas,
police, fire, and a new branch library. The 1980 population
of the Rosedale subsector was 20,141.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, ROSEDALE SUBSECTOR

This is an area of primarily large, two-story, brick singlefamily homes in good to excellent condition. Lot sizes are
significantly larger than in most other parts of the City;
densities are less than 12 units per acre.
The only issue of significance is the balance of- land uses and
the appropriateness of some of the commercial strip
development.
As in many other areas of the City, this
Subsector may benefit by improvements to some thoroughfare
frontages, especially along McNichols, to encourage more local
commercial and residential development.
ROSEDALE SUBSECTOR GOALS

The goal is to preserve and enhance the existing character and
quality. The vision for the future is that Rosedale become
an increasingly desirable community for families of relative
affluence not only among Detroit communities but on a regional
basis.
POLICY 310-8:

Rosedale Subsector Policies

Maintain and preserve the Rosedale area as a premium community
for family living.
Encourage local commercial and residential development along
Schoolcraft and McNichols.
Continue efforts to stabilize and upgrade
Shopping Center at Grand River and Fenkell.

the

Grandland

Protect Rosedale neighborhoods from abrasive uses that may
locate along Grand River.

3/90

III-150

-I

�...

I
I

~

•.

~ t

RL

cc

i:;

RL
W Out~r

POS

Or

I

RL

s
:,:

RL

w
::,
0

:RL

'i:

......

L ndon

i M

:

•

cc
····":!.':-!'.:-'!!...

z

w

RLC

uc .. . _ ~

BRIBHTM00R

SC--.,--,

RLC---..

GC---..

MUii----~
*·
..............
...

-

cc---..

l»• N • •A&amp;..I.Z80
IE&lt;JaTING LAND U8II

~

POS-, ....... ~ .....

v-v-t

LANDU-

CEM·-

RL • . . . , - - - . .

Playt-.~

IILM• ~ - - . . . ~

RH·---

---c.a&amp;y..-ual

SRC·---

INST-IND-~~
IJ:INI)..... -

I

~

ei

"

s..

~

t ..

n

[j_J

1 lnctl • 2000 ti.

actH

112

r===1

--

for explanation of eategori••

-

WEST SECTOR

3

Brightmoor Subsector ••••••••••••••• 310-9

III-lSOA

1

r===

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

WEST SECTOR

BRIGHTMOOR SUBSECTOR BOONDARIES-.AND FEATURES

The Br ightmoor subsector is bounded by Puri tan, Fielding,
Fenkell, Ken~f~eld, Lyndon, Gl"andville, Schoolcraft, the
Southfield Freeway, the Jeffries Freeway, the western City
limits, Fenkell, and Lahser. The area is developed primarily
with single-family homes,
and supporting shopping and
services. A substantial industrial district is located in the
eastern portion of the subsector, while the western portion
includes a major city park, Eliza Howell, developed along the
Rouge River Valley. The Smith Romes, a small public housing
project, is also located here.
The 1980 population of
Brightmoor was 19,914 people.
Brightmoor is relatively less affluent than the other
subsectors of the West Sector but about average relative to
the City as a whole.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, BRIGHTMOOR SUBSECTOR

Housing in the area bounded generally by Fenkell, Evergreen,
Schoolcraft, and Lahser is in fair to poor condition; boardedup homes and homes in need of major repair a -re scattered
through the area, as are vacant lots left when badly damaged
homes had to be demolished.
The City-owned public housing at Lyndon and Evergreen,
Smith Homes, includes some vacant and boarded uni ts.
housing located in close proximity to the industry along
Jeffries Freeway west of Southfield shows some signs
stress.
A limited amount of industrial expansion may
feasible here some time in the future, if the demand
industrial sites becomes much stronger.

the
The
the
of
be
for

Some of the uses in the area may not be an asset for a local
retail district but are well-established at their locations,
i.e., adult-oriented uses, auto repair operations.
The
Fenkell commercial frontage has been a popular location for
clubhouses established by motorcycle clubs from Detroit's west
side
for
some
time.
As
normal
turnover
occurs
in
establishments located along Fenkell, opportunities are
created to strengthen the shopping district by adding retail
and service uses that relate to the neighborhood, rather than
abrasive general business uses that could locate elsewhere.

III-151

3/90

--- -

- ---- -

�..--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

WEST SECTOR

BRIGHTMOOR SUBSECTOR GOALS

This Subsector has shown some signs of decHne but the area's
basic function is as a souftd, desirable single-family
comrnuni ty, in close proxirni ty to a substantial number of
employment opportunities, and this function will be reinforced
by the implementation of the following policies.
POLICY 310-9:

Brightrnoor Subsector policies

Consider low-interest loans and grants for housing maintenance
and rehabilitation.
Utilize existing programs such as enforcement of environmental
codes, building demolition, vacant lot maintenance, and the
boarding of vacant structures to stabilize Brightmoor
residential areas.
Stabilize and upgrade the Brightrnoor shopping district.
Encourage
desirable
development.

neighborhood-oriented

commercial

Promote the reuse of vacant industrial facilities.
Consider the light industrial expansion for the area north of
the former Massey-Ferguson complex.
Encourage the development of apartments and local commercial
uses along Fenkell and Schoolcraft.
Maintain and stabilize the Smith Hornes public housing project.

3/90

III-152

�- ~
--~- ~1-~lCw
..:.i.,
X

I

~ 1-:
~

11

:

-.: :.£_,.--=.~:;:p.?.~·-@mar~---~. .
JE FFRIES ,, FW;,

~ - I N: S T ':

! .,. .... ::i

RL

l

~ i~

\IJ

:

-···

:

:

.......... :

POS

IU

~ ·' :
! : RL
:
j :......... '\

RL

:

!

!

•

•

C&amp;

q R

iGc

(Golf
Course)

~!

,..

'iii

iRLM

••••••••••••• ··••y
•• •••••••••·••••••--i. .?\v. :••• ALM
RM'
··•. &lt;;, t,1.

:i

:

i!
.j l
~JI

a:

0

,..

a:

::,

;.......;~

RL

(

0

3!

r-·-·····

i9••············•·

RL

:•--\-:

PLY M OU TH

: I RL

C &amp; O RA

•

POS

i

!

! IND

...., IND
[....................

•

POS
Rouge Park

~

~
~

AL
w Ch i ca o

PAOPCWIID LAND U ••
AL - ,.. ....e r ~

\.

i!~!!!

-~--+-----~-----.a.i.---..
AND

i

.iE;••••L.

RL

r····R·······..·-· ............Rtc····················

JOY

taa:N • IIIAUZ80
IRXlaTING LAND u&amp;a

:RLM ••

IPOS

RL

CDDV

~

~

•

*

...,,~'\f~.
. :i
i ••••• -~/ •..
: ·-.

LT IND' '•:.

--~~-----+;_~-1/83

IIC-••~

se
RLC_ - - -_ _ .

GC--..-

AA

l.Lnorth

LJ

1 Inch • 2000 tt .

[1J

cc---..

ecre•

MUR- ___ _

P09- .......,c..- ....
V•YMUt

CEIi· -

o.o

RLM-~o..a.c,o~

-----a...ty-.i..J.

AH----.-...-.w.
SAC-_ .....
INST--

.25

WEST
J

........

.so

c:::::=,

III-152A

,.a

c::-,

SECTOR

- .........

Cody Subsector ••••••••••••••••••••• 310-10

.11

...,.

�-

-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLU:IES

WEST SECTOR

CODY SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND FEATURES

The Cody subsector is bounded by the Jeffries Freeway, the
Southfield. !1reeway,-·Joy Road, and the western City limits.
The area is developed primarily with single-family homes,
industry along the C&amp;O Railroad lines and the Jeffries
Freeway, and major recreation use in the Rouge Valley area
adjoining the Rouge River.
Local shopping and general
business uses are located along Plymouth and Joy Road.
In
1980, Cody had a population -of 24,451 living in 9,055
households.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, CODY SUBSECTOR

Commercial land use strategies which will strengthen the sound
existing uses while stimulating creative reuse of the vacant
buildings and land are required for the Cody Subsector.
Portions of Plymouth and Joy Road within Rouge Park are not
developed with commercial uses and, as a
result,
the
oversupply of strip commercial land is less severe here than
in other parts of the City.
The park itself may generate
sufficient traffic to support restaurants and party stores
near the park entrances.

•

The Cody Subsector presents an interesting planning problem.
On the one hand, the area lost less population between 1970
and 1980 than the City as a whole, and median family incomes
are well above the City median; this would suggest a strong
market for retail development. On the other hand, almost all
residents have cars, and suburban shopping centers are only
a few minutes away.
Planning Department data on shopping
habits of Detroit residents confirm that residents of the West
Sector are likely to be suburban shoppers for their general
merchandise needs,
while convenience goods,
food,
and
drugstore items may be purchased near their homes.
CODY SUBSECTOR GOALS

This Subsector is one of the more desirable areas for family
living in the City, and the goal is to maintain and enhance
the area as a sound and attractive family-oriented community
with
convenient,
well-planned
shopping,
services,
and
recreational opportunities.

3/90

III-153

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL::u:IES
POLICY 310-10:

WEST SECTOR

Cody Subsector policies

Utilize existing programs such as
the enforcement of
environmental
codes,
building
demolition,
vacant
lot
maintenanc~, and the boarding of vacant structures to
stabilize housing located south-of the Jeffries Freeway.
Encourage local commercial and residential use along Joy Road.
Continue to improve Rouge Park.Encourage new light industrial uses to locate along the
C &amp; 0 Railroad corridor.
Seek compatible uses for vacant buildings in the WeaverFitzpatrick industrial corridor.

3/90

III-154

�ROUGE

-N

-

• '9AuaD
IE&lt;laTING L.AND Lall
PRCIP! -

LAN0 U AL .. 1.a1 _ _ _ , ~

1.:..--+-------~·o,•;, -------"---------••

....-....

•·····......

..··...

RL

···········-~

:--·•····

INST .....~:

~:

RM .. ,...--,,.....aal

IIH---I .:mueaw.

RL

·--···;_i

IILM•--SRC- -.u - te:t
INST--.-

RL

INC)..~~

IIC---

I.IIND,,.._-...

.
.
..
.

:;;,;;;,s=======il====='g•~
••:gm~•fe"======~ ~~~

ac--POS---sc---

IILC-_...,._-...

RL

cc---

RL

IIUR- ................
y ... y _ _ __

CEM·*- ,i.o,u.-w

RL

'='--

.................... u..

GC I
I

C

-'

UJ

I
'-1...,

~
;::

RL

::,

I
I

0

(/)

Paul

RL
1 lnc::tl • 2000 It .
FO R

C,
[j_J
ac,.•

0

V

8

112

1

0.0
. 2.5
.50
.75
1.0
c_____:i,----,'-----'c::::,

··-

WEST SECTOR
3.06-10

Rouge Subsector •••••••••••••••••••• 310-11

...,.

c:::=:=::,;,-------,..:::=r:=:::::,

III-154A

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICES

WEST SECTOR

ROUGE SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND ~EATURES
The Rouge subsector is bounded by Joy Road, the Southfield
Freeway, and the southern and western City limits. The area
is developed primarily with single-family homes, supporting
services, and major recreation- use.
In 1980, Rouge had a
population of 26,647, living in 9,873 households.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, ROUGE SUBSECTOR
As of 1980, Rouge had experienced the least population
turnover of any subsector in the West Sector. Consequently,
it had a very large proportion of long-term residents and of
senior citizens and relatively few children.
Even with the
high proportion of senior citizens, income levels in the area
are about that of the West Sector overall.
The Rouge Subsector, like much of the West Sector, was one of
the last sections of the City to develop. Building conditions
are generally good, and the general land use pattern is
reasonable, although the neighborhood west of Rouge Park is
isolated from the Rouge area east of the park.
Development along Joy Road and West Warren includes general
commercial uses and local shopping and services. The Joy Road
and West Warren frontage should be reviewed and, where
appropriate, local business and residential uses encouraged.
A local business category would better recognize the nature
of the existing development and provide additional protection
for Rouge neighborhoods from abrasive uses permitted by the
current categories.
ROUGE SUBSECTOR GOALS
This Subsector is one of the
areas of the City.
The goal
quality of the housing stock
organization of local retail
POLICY 310-11:

more recently built and stable
is to maintain and enhance the
and improve the convenience and
and service facilities.

Rouge Subsector policies

Encourage local commercial and residential development along
West Warren and Joy Road.
Continue to improve Rouge Park.
Complete development of the parcel at the Southfield-Ford Road
interchange with commercial and residential use while
protecting the adjoining neighborhood.
3/90

III-155

�-

.!.

CO NIIIA IL

. ···············~·-·:
u-rli
Hubb•II

C,: .

IC
Q

!

~

IC

: IL_

Ii

. a:

.J

i: ::

.J

:c,

a:

jl :

¢1

ii

: J:
:

:

--···:·-:1

:

..

Q

~

··••y

2)., 11 !

u
C,

:

!

H...:
I:

~

r··········:

Q

• ·I
: jt

:I)."
~:
a: •

II

:!

ii

:

q

:;

r-··········~
.

-~~mt,! ll :

,.,;,.y

,,

•»»••················
~
u.f- :···············-·~
:u

w"'
t~..
. . · · ·. ···1l·········....2:
-·u:,,.a,,,,&lt;1:-/....
!
01ir:·1 ii~ ~--··-····:···•:1
*=:
L.~~
ul;..............
... :·
~ ✓~1g
.
u:

u: :;;
".;: z

~

:

a:

&gt;

~

• •••I ~ --••: :

a::

1'

w:

&lt;,.,p'

~

:I ...

IC

I

.,,

,/'

f

~

..I !-3
a:
• ~

:

:~

FWY:

c,

..

1

11

I,

IC

C

3'1

l SOUTHFIELD

1

IC

.,
=·

r

.J

.,

a:

:,

:

:I

Cft

~I! !

:,

~

.J

a:'='•--·
: ..
a, ..... ..
! i-~

....

·"

~

-:.·

IJ:IND---..

MC--SC--...-..

BROOKS

-

R
GC-L
_ C
_.. -..

aaN • aAUDD

MUft..-..-~

POS---. .......
Y•v-c.

ua•

CEIi--

RL.,- _
_...
RLM•----

...............
.....__ ...
• · Pi..,ti.eW

All• . . . _ a . . . , ~
RH- .
. __
SRC_...
.,.__,....,._...,

--...--.a.l

INST--

IND---..

'

.... 1

1000ft

-

cc---

IIXlaTING LAND 1.18a
PIA0POEHI I L.AN0

~..

~

see

~

0
0.0

.n

IO

'---

for explaaacion of eaU9ori.ee

WEST SECTOR

3.07-12

Brooks Subsector ••.•••••••••••••••• 310-12

·11

1.0

~,---,

III-155A

""'•

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~iEs

WEST SECTOR

BROOKS SUBSECTOR BOUNDARIES AND_FEATURES

.Tbe-. Br..ooks Subsector is bounded by the Jeffries Freeway, the
Union Belt Railroad line, Tirem.n, Greenfield, Paul, and the
Southfield Freeway.
The area includes single-family homes,
apartments, a major public ho.using project, shopping and
supporting services, and industry along the rail line, which
is now worked by a Conrail crew.
In 1980, Brooks included
38,219 people living in 13,365 households.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, BROOKS SUBSECTOR

This Subsector has been the site of an above-average rate
population turnover in recent years and has attracted
relatively less afflueRt families, including a high proportion
of female-headed households with children living at or below
the poverty level.
The presence of Herman Gardens in the
Subsector,
with its concentration of such households,
influences the statistics but the changes are because of
turnover in other portions of the area.
Even so, it is
important to note that the Brooks Subsector is still at a
socio-economic level on par with that of Detroit levels
overall.
The Brooks Subsector contains over 15,000 housing uni ts,
considerably more than any other Subsector in the West Sector.
About 70 percent of the housing uni ts are single-family
detached structures of one to two stories; the remaining 30
percent of the housing units are in small or large apartment
buildings. The City-owned Herman Gardens project accounts for
less than half of these apartment units. Housing in the area
east of Greenfield was built prior to World War II and is in
fair to good condition.
Housing in the area between
Greenfield and Southfield as far south as Tireman is generally
in fair to poor condition.
Housing south of Tireman is in
generally good condition.
The Joy Road-Greenfield area includes general commercial and
apartment development and a small community shopping center
at the intersection.
The area is in fair condition but has
potential for change because of the number of vacant buildings
and land.
The West Warren-Greenfield thoroughfare frontage
includes general commercial and apartment development and is
in fair to good condition.
Appropriate code enforcement
should be utilized to stabilize the area.

3/90

III-156

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

WEST SECTOR

Housing and industry are immediately adjacent and along the
, full length of the Schaefer-Hubbell industrial corridor. Both
the housing and the general commercial uses on the major eastwest streets are showing signs ef blight that may reduce the
chances for further industrial investment, if these conditions
are not corrected.
BROOKS SOBSECTOR GOALS
This Subsector has many desirabte features but the important
goal
is
to stabilize the area
check
any
further
deterioration and begin to reverse the process of aging
through implementation of the following policies.
The area
should soon emerge a one where a variety of attractive housing
alternatives can be found within a sound community structure,
close to convenient shopping, employment, and recreational
opportunities.
POLICY 310-12:

Brooks Subsector policies

Continue to improve the Herman Gardens project.
Encourage local commercial and residential development along
Joy Road to West Chicago.
Revitalize commercial development along Plymouth Road.
Encourage new industrial uses to locate
industrial corridor east of Hubbell.

in

the

Conrail

Encourage housing maintenance and rehabilitation in the area
west of Greenfield and north of West Chicago.
Develop a clear boundary between industry and
development in the Plymouth-Hubbell area.

3/90

residential

III-157

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

WOODWARD AREA

ARTICLE 311
WOODWARD AREA

WOODWARD AREA LOCATION AND EXTENT

The Woodward Area is bounded by the Fisher Freeway on the
south, Lodge Freeway to the west, Chrysler Freeway on the
east, and the City boundary with Highland Park on the north.
It is an approximate one-mile wide by four-mile long strip of
land beginning just north of the Central Business District and
extending northward to the southern boundary of the City of
Highland Park.
The Woodward Area is divided into two
subareas:
Lower Woodward and Middle Woodward.
Additional
information on that portion of the Woodward area north of
Highland Park but south of Eight Mile Road may be referenced
in Article 305, North Sector, or Article 307, Northwest
Sector.
WOODWARD AREA FEATURES AND IMPORTANCE

The Woodward Area is Detroit's major regional transportation
corridor and business spine.
From the New Center area
(Woodward at Grand Boulevard) to the Central Business District
are concentrated a host of regional institutions such as Wayne
State University and the Detroit Medical Center as well as
major corporate headquarters and other businesses.
Woodward Avenue serves as Detroit's "main street".
It is a
major point of reference for all Detroiters (dividing the City
between east and west), and it is one of the "faces" the City
shows most often to visitors.
The impression Woodward
projects to people plays a major role in people's impressions
of Detroit and perhaps of southeast Michigan. For this reason
and
because
of
the
desirability
of
encouraging
new
developments along Woodward, urban design policies are
emphasized as are economic development policies.
WOODWARD AREA PLANNING ISSUES AND FUTURE POTENTIALS

The Woodward Area is one of contrasts - old and new, rich and
poor.
It is very dynamic, with problems also representing
opportunities:
vacant land and buildings, under-utilized
3/90

III-158

�SUB SECTORS
11,.., ,.... ,, .
ftQOOlANO

CHICAGO

MICCLE

LOWER

1 inch , 31531 fl

acres
~•rid

=

n,,te

0 0

=

50

lulom.te,

WOODWARD

Lower Woodward Subarea ..
Middle Woodward Subarea.

. . 311-9
.311-10

10

,---------,

AREA

�c.e.wuzm

REZONING CONCEPT
U
M
U
M

S!NGL£-FNIIIY RESIDENT/,4L
TWO-F Aill/Y R£5/IJEJ{T/,4L
LON-DENSITY RES/DENTIN
THOROOGHFARE RESIDEKTl/&gt;l
IIEDIUAl·DENSrrt RESIDENTl/&gt;l
HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTll&gt;l

Bl
82
83
84
86

RESTRICTED BUSINESS
LOCN BUSIIIESSIRESIOENT!,4L
SHOPPING CX5TRICT
GENER/&gt;l 005/NESS
GENER,4L SEFMCES

Ml
M2
M3
M4
M5

UMITED INfJJSTRl/&gt;l
RESTRICTED JN()USTRl/&gt;l
GENERl&gt;l lNCXJSTRl/&gt;l
IKTENSflE INOOSTR/,4L
SPECl/&gt;l INWSTR/,4L

11
t2

SDI SPECl/&gt;l OCYEWPUENT
(resldentlal,'lfilh lfmiled comrrerc/a/J

SD2 SPECl/&gt;l D&amp;fWP/JENT
!conrnerc/al,wffh lfmiled resldentla/J

PO
PC
PCA
TM

PWNED OCYE:WPUENT
PUBUC CEIITER
RESTRICTED CENTR/&gt;l BUSINESS
TRAIISIT/C,Y.AL INOOSTRl/&gt;l

PR

PARKS and P.ECREATION
PUBUC WH#IF

WOODWARD AREA

---------- --- --- ----- -- -- ---- - ------ -.... ------- - --- -- --- --- ---- -- --- ---- --- -- ------ -------------- ----- ---- ---- .. --- ------ ----- --·-------- -.

�THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLI~-E S

WOODWARD AREA

utilities, numerous bus routes.- The area has major freeway
, access to all parts of southeastern Michigan.
It appears that service sector employment is likely to be an
area of potential growth.
There- are over 40,000 service
sector jobs in the Woodward - Area.
Services include:
education, media and advertising, health care, communications,
retail and wholesale distribution, corporate management, and
business services, and high-technology research.
Together
with the Central Business District, high technology functions
and activities should be planned -and operated as a unified and
coordinated whole to provide maximum economic and social
benefit to the City of Detroit and to the Detroit region as
a whole.
Residents of the area often have special needs
representing special population groups, and are served by
institutions which are concentrated in the area. The Woodward
Area has many human development oriented institutions.
Woodward Avenue is the main parade route for the City and
"front door" to many important institutions, districts, and
neighborhoods.
Its design and esthetic quality are major
factors in the image of Detroit.
A detailed light rail mass transit proposal has been prepared
to expand accessibility and stimulate economic development
within and adjacent to the Woodward Area.
The proposed
regional light rail system is viewed both as a means of
improving
public
transit
service
in
the
Woodward
transportation corridor and as an economic development tool
in a coordinated process to improve socio-economic conditions
in the region and within the Woodward Area.
Light rail
station areas will require more concentrated planning and
implementation efforts.
One of the potential benefits of a light rail system and a
major concern especially in the Lower Woodward Area is the
restoration of the former land use pattern which had the
highest density and most intense use along Woodward Avenue.
To the west of Woodward, housing development is a major need.
Housing should be constructed for all income groups and family
sizes in mixed developments.
To the east of Woodward a
comprehensive development and conservation program is needed.
The light rail transit system could be most helpful in these
redevelopment efforts.

3/90

III-159

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL::a:;J:ES
POLICY 311-1:

WOODWARD AREA

Woodward Area - -P epulation and Housing

Encourage an increase in population generally throughout the
area, especially families with children. Develop housing for
different household sizes and types, including new housing,
rehabilitation of existing housing and infill housing
utilizing both on-site construction and house moving.
Coordinate densities:
provide . for greater densities near
transit stations but avoid congestion and limit grade level
parking. Insure that housing opportunities meet the needs of
current residents.
POLICY 311-2:

Woodward
Area
Commercial Services and
-=F,
. .a_c_,,i,. ,l:-1..-.t.,-;-i_e_s___________________
_

Further develop New Center as a major retail center which
complements
retail
development
in
downtown;
promote
development of a second department store and family-oriented
restaurants. Encourage more family-oriented restaurants and
other community and commercial facilities in the Cultural
Center area.
Provide for convenience shopping and services
for all residential areas, with special attention to the needs
of senior citizens; consider rezoning selected areas from B4
(general business) to a less intensive zoning district
classification. Promote increased private sector recreation
and entertainment facilities.
Develop and enforce facade
maintenance, especially along Woodward.
POLICY 311-3:

Woodward Area - Transportation System

Construct the Woodward light rail transit system and provide
crosstown feeder buses to each station.
Improve local bus
service, including an increase in the number, security and
comfort of bus shelters, with special attention to the needs
of seniors and others with limited mobility.
Provide for
adequate vehicular circulation, avoiding conflicts with
residential areas. Encourage left-turn only lanes as traffic
warrants at major intersections. Develop an improved system
of pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Improve pedestrian
street crossings.
Provide adequate parking; encourage structured rather than
surface parking in densely developed areas; encourage use of
well-landscaped and maintained vacant lots for parking where
needed.

3/90

III-160

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL]l;IES

POLICY 311-4:

Woodward Area - .-Land Use,
Historic Preservation

WOODWARD AREA
Urban Design,

and

Recognize and emphasize Woodward-Avenue as the major symbolic
street of the region: give special design attention to
appearance and image, especially to improve the area near the
Medical and New Centers.
Encourage intensive, mixed-use
development along Woodward, especially near transit stops.
Encourage multi-purpose pedestrian-oriented centers.
Encourage intensive street-levei activity, both in existing
and new development.
Suppor-t -existing and new residential
uses in mixed-use districts, but insure adequate buffering
between incompatible uses. Develop open space appropriate to
the needs of the surrounding community; design for a variety
of activities and for security and maintenance: encourage
voluntary maintenance assistance by nearby residents.
Recognize
and
protect
the
images
of
the
residential
neighborhoods:
keep development compatible in terms of
architecture, scale, texture, materials, placement, and usage.
Recognize and enhance the special districts ( New Center,
Cultural Center, Medical Center, and Technology District);
emphasize the distinctive nature of each nonresidential
district through unifying elements, such as signage, street
furniture,
and landscaping;
lessen their
isolation
by
providing linkages such as pedestrian and bike paths, mini
bus systems: relate to construction of nearby housing.
Recognize and protect distinctive urban spaces and vistas:
especially between the Main Library and the Art Institute,
views of Cass Park, views along Second toward the Fisher
Building, and along Woodward toward the CBD.
Preserve and strengthen the character of existing historic
districts through landscape treatment and street resurfacing,
code enforcement, and insuring that new development is
compatible.
Treat historic districts as integral and functioning parts of
the overall community. Give special emphasis to the use and
adoptive reuse of architecturally significant or historic
structures.
Use
historic
designation
to
preserve
exceptionally significant individual structures, but not to
the detriment of needed economic development.
Provide more leisure time opportunities, through out reach
programs by area institutions, expansion of current and
development of new recreation sites as needed, expansion of
senior citizen recreation programs, and the incl us ion of
3/90

III-161

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES
outdoor open space as
, development projects.
POLICY 311-5:

WOODWARD AREA

leisure-areas

in

the design of

new

Woodward Area - -economic Development

Maximize the economic development
around transit stations.

potential

of

the

areas

Utilize all available investment incentives.
Promote use of· existing features and attractions.
Strengthen commercial and office areas through rehabilitation
and
reoccupancy of vacant structures;
improvements
in
appearance, security, parking; and strengthening merchants
organizations.
Increase employment through upgrading job skills and increased
opportunities for residents.
Develop a Technology District to attract research and
development firms, incubating new firms at the Metropolitan
Center for High Technology (former Kresge headquarters), and
utilizing new and existing buildings in the surrounding area.
Utilize and improve the Detroit Edison steam-heat system,
utilizing energy from Detroit Resource Recovery plant to
reduce costs; make necessary repairs and improvements; promote
as a development and rehabilitation incentive.
POLICY 311-6 :

Woodward Area - Crime Control and Prevention

Keep Police Department informed about planned developments.
Design for security and maintenance, including environmental
security techniques without the II fortress II image.
Promote
participation in Citizen Watch groups, security patrols, and
education in security measures. Support alternative schools,
trade schools, and work/study program to lower truancy and
dropouts.
Continue crime analysis to target priority crime.
POLICY 311-7:

Woodward Area - Fire Prevention and Control

Promote smoke alarms in all housing units giving financial
aid where needed. Inform and involve Fire Department persons
in all development projects.
Board vacant buildings and
remove
abandoned
and
dangerous
buildings.
Continue
educational efforts about
fire
prevention.
Encourage
installation of automatic fire suppression devices.
Expand
anti-arson programs.
Publicize restrictions on use of
3/90

III-162

�.,

--

THE DETROIT .. MASTER PLAN OF . POLI:CIES

WOODWARD AREA

kerosene heaters.
Promot.e incr.eased use of fire drills for
, seniors and handicapped in group quarters.
Construct a new
fire station in the vicinity of Woodward and Fisher Freeway.
POLICY 311-8:

Woodward Area - Senior
Special Needs Groups

Citizens

and

Other

Provide support to those in greatest need, especially those
living alone or in rooming houses.
Promote alternates for
housing seniors; improve health services as recommended in
1982 Needs Assessment in the Detroit Area Survey Report.
Increase public education efforts relative to the needs of
the elderly. Make special efforts to reach the isolated.
Provide multi-use centers within senior housing developments.
Increase emphasis on special health needs and health education
of residents.
Increase access to primary health care.
Maintain
and
further
develop
highly
responsive
and
sophisticated emergency system.

3/90

III-163

�.

.

LOWER WOODWARD

PLANNING UNITII

university-cultural center
Art center
C Medical Center Residential
C Medical center
I! In•titutional Area
F Mid-City
GI Brewater-Dougla• • Home •
H B.niah Park
l Technology Cre • cent

A

a

(Central Portion)

J

Casa Corridor

K Mixed-u.ae Area
L Jeffrie• Homes

I,~
·e

·'l ':3

H

G

;;;::-"'•llun1

~

gn~th

n
cu

1 Inell •Hff fl ,

• ere•

1,2

,

r===t===•r==---,
...,.

o.a
.25
.so
.1s
1.0
~r:::,

··-

WOODWARD AREA

- -

~

----

=---~

---=-- .. -

---.C-=

�•
LOWER WOODWARD

a • N • 91Auz• a
EXISTING LANO UBE
RL.,--.,.-.RLM-.-.... - . , . ~
RM--..-... --.1&amp;1
RH- R19l Dnliey ~
SRC- si-:w. ~ - - . : I A I .
INST-1-1.cut.1a1AJ.
IND---.1.1:IND-~-

....

J.

I "·"
fRM

'"

j

I· c • ., . •

1:1

RH•GC

" :-~

£ ~•
~
;:;

...

TAC- Ttlorou.ghfue llltaidelttial-C~c.t.al
MC--a:n.rc:l.al
SC-si-,:w."-'d.&amp;1
RLC- - - "-'d.&amp;1

~~
l;:r.. ~

GC---.o-c..J.

CC- Cmn&lt;ci&amp;l
MUR-111-iu.~
MP- KaJor Park
RC- Recra•t.1on

OS· Open
OSI - Open

VAC•

Spa&lt;,9

Space- 1nst.1t.1.1t1.onal

Vacant

CEM·c..u,.,,

Jeffries

Brewster- Douglass
Homes

~

LJ

1IOCll•200011 .

&amp;.:..11
o.o

.:15

.50

[j_J

.75

1.0

c:::=.:l'="?c:::::::f=='

""'·

Id-

WOODWARD AREA

LOWER WOODWARD
Cl • N • IIAL..IZaD
PROPCSED LAND UBE

RL-1.o,,~tr~
RLM- ~ ca.:i.e, ~
RM- ~ a.aa.cy -.....w

RH • . . . . , _ . . , _
SRC----

INST - ,_,___,
IND•-LJ:IND-....-.,-TAC- Tbaro~At•n Mu,Mnual•C-l'OUl

MC---

SC-,-w._.._._.
RLC·-,--

GC---..

c.._.
c_
-MUR_
MPACPOS-

M)or ,.,.11

-~r.. :.1.on

,...._t

0S1 • Opel\
V·

opn

s..-

.Sp&amp;c-e-tn • ut.uuorui !

V•eant

CEM·-.

OS

*- Playtie14
OS
+

INST

• - Tra.n.a{t stat.1.on
!Gen • ral Locat10n )

~

&amp;n~•~

LJ

,, .. 11,200011 .

[j_J
ac,ea

1, 2

1

~.----------,
0.0

.:15

.so

,----,

.75

1.0

.....--.

WOODWARD AREA

Lower Woodward Subarea .••••••••.••• 311-9

III-163A

""'·

�r

---

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:u:IES

WOODWARD AREA

LOWER WOODWARD SUBAREA BOUNDARI-~ AND FEATURES

The Lower Woodward Subarea is bounded by Ford, Chrysler,
Fisher, and Lodge Freeways. It includes Wayne State
University,
Cultural
Center,
Medical
Center,
and
is
immediately north of the Central Business District and south
of the New Center.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, LOWER WOODWARD SUBAREA

The area has had major clearance and rebuilding, mostly
nonresidential use, and abandonment has caused further
demolition
of
many
dangerous
buildings.
Residential
rehabilitation, in many cases, has created larger and fewer
units in the same structures.
There has been a decrease in
permanent resident hotels and there has been a trend toward
one-person households.
Lower Woodward is home for a concentration of those in
poverty, both individuals and families. Low-cost housing and
numerous charity and last-recourse type services are available
here. Most of the City's emergency shelter beds are located
in Lower Woodward as are various food and human services
programs.
Assisting in meeting the needs of the poor will
remain a major social task for the foreseeable future. Lower
Woodward clearly is part of the system currently serving this
function.
Much of the Lower Woodward community (between the Ford and
Fisher Freeways) will undergo significant changes over the
next 20 years. Continuation of such City development projects
as the Medical Center and Art Center will stabilize and
strengthen the community.
These and other ongoing projects
will be joined by two highly significant new ones: light rail
rapid transit, and the proposed Technology District, in which
housing and commercial uses are mixed with offices and very
light research industry.
Implementation of planned transit with stops at Mack and
Warren will revitalize Woodward Avenue while reinforcing the
major institutional developments that have already occurred.
Significant development tools in Lower Woodward are briefly
summarized:
light rail transit; the Detroit Edison steam
system; right-of-way and commercial frontage improvements;
zoning changes; tax abatements, l ....i11d write-downs, housing
subsidies,
and
other
direct
aid
to
revenue-producing
development; encouragement of corporate and institutional
investment in the proposed Technology District; and historic
3/90

III-164

�r

•

- - . -·-·- · - .. THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

designation and
, areas.

rehabili tation .-loans

WOODWARD AREA
in historic and other

Plans must recognize the specia-:1 housing and other needs of
the less affluent, the senior citizens, the young people
related to the institutions, and others. The large amount of
vacant and under-utilized land should be seen as a resource.
The institutions need to be related to the neighborhoods and
provide services to them.
The commercial services are in a
wide range of conditions depending on their market with the
worst being in areas of greatest loss of population.
LOWER WOODWARD SUBAREA GOALS
There is a great deal of potential in the Lower Woodward
subarea due to its advantageous location, its wealth of strong
institutions and facilities, and because of the large amount
of vacant land available.
Because of these factors and the
eventual establishment of the light rail system along
Woodward, the area will become a desirable location for new
development. This new development, however, will have to be
designed
to
appropriately
blend
with
sound
existing
development and, along with the existing area institutions,
be used to help address the special needs and support improved
services for the current residents of the area.
POLICY 311-9:

A.

Lower Woodward Subarea Policies

University-Cultural Center area (Ford Freeway, Woodward,
Ferry, John R, Palmer, Brush, Hancock, Cass, Forest,
Second, Warren, Lodge Freeway)

The area along Woodward Avenue within this planning unit
should develop as a high-density mixed use area, with housing
and ground-floor commercial, where possible. Discourage lowintensity uses such as fast-food restaurants. Strengthen the
Cass Avenue frontage by encouraging ground-floor commercial
uses in any new housing and conserve existing housing.
Encourage construction of structured parking with at least two
new structures one to the west and one to the east of Woodward
Avenue.
Encourage landscape improvements in the area.
Encourage downgrading John R as a through street and
development of cultural and art-related commercial services.
Encourage expansion of cultural and educational institutions
including the Detroit Science Center, the Children's Museum,
the Museum of African-American History, the Detroit Institute
of Arts, and the Center for Creative Studies.
Institutional
3/90

III-165

�..

-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

WOODWARD AREA

expansion should occur generall~along-Brush •
• encourage major
new housing development
institution development.
B.

East of Brush,
to
complement

Art
Center
area
(Ford -Freeway,
Chrysler
Freeway,
Frederick, Brush, Palmer, Ferry, and Woodward)

Implement the adopted
especially
encourage
construction.

c.

Art Center development
housingrehabilitation

plan,
and

Medical Center. Residential (Chrysler Freeway,
School, St. Antoine, Hancock, Brush, Frederick)

Implement Medical Center #4 adopted
especially promote new housing.

D.

project

and
new
Spain

plan,

and

Medical Center (St. Antoine, Mack, Woodward, Alexandrine,
John R, Canfield, Brush, Hancock)

Implement and complete adopted plan including Brush pedestrian
mall and Brush Plaza and a ring road.
Develop land at
Woodward and Mack intensively and appropriately.
E.

Institutional
Playfield)

Area

(Spain

and

Crockett

Schools

and

No special actions needed.

F.

Mid-City (Hancock, Brush, Canfield, John R, Alexandrine)

Develop the Veterans Hospital as planned.
Develop mixed
commercial-residential uses of the highest quality reflecting
the importance of Woodward Avenue, and discourage freestanding
fast-food establishments.

G.

Brewster-Douglass
Beaubien)

Homes

(Mack,

Chrysler,

Fisher,

Short-range maintenance and improvement is required. Improved
retail service is needed.
Seek increased Federal funds and
alternative financing.

H.

Brush Park (Mack, Beaubien, Fisher, Woodward)

Pursue rehabilitation and conservation as a part of a
comprehensive development plan. Preserve the historically and
3/90

- -

III-166

~

-

~

•

�.

•

-·-

.THE DETROLT MASTER PLAN OF POL:u;:IES

WOODWARD AREA

architecturally significant . chaxacter of Brush Park through
, the retention of identifiable historic residential clusters,
while providing for the opportunity for a blend of new
residential and commercial deve-¼-opment.
I.

Technology District (Martin Luther
Fisher, Lodge, Temple, Fourth)

King,

Woodward,

Promote research facilities for growth technology and related
uses.
Continue as a mixed-use- area including residential,
commercial, and institutional us-es. Landscape appropriately,
especially along Woodward.
J.

Cass Corridor (Warren, Second, Forest, Cass, King, Lodge
Freeway)

Encourage maintenance and development, especially of housing,
for all income and social groups and support systems.
Encourage improvements and conserve as much housing as
possible and infill with compatible structures.
Discourage
residentially abrasive uses.
Design to meet future traffic
needs.
K.

Mixed-Use Area (Hancock, Woodward, Mack, Cass)

Keep as a mixed-use area, including small housing uni ts,
commercial,
and institutional uses.
Improve Woodward
appearance and landscape. Discourage new industry here.
L.

Jeffries Homes (King, Fourth, Temple, Lodge)

Maintain and upgrade to the extent possible.

3/90

III-167

�..

MIDDLE

wDo-•1
.,..,.JARD

PLANNING!
A Webb-Woodland
. UNITS
B North I d
Residential
C
n ustrial
Area
Boaton-Ed '
Project
D Gladsto

ison/ Arden Park

E Wood
ne Residential
F B
,....rd Frontage
Area
rush-HoliJrook
.

G Oakland A

Residential Area

M Holbrook-venue Frontage
I New Center
Cameron
Re•idential Area
C
J Chandlerommons
KN ew center
Beaubien
Co
Residential Area
L Burro
mmercial Area
ughs Area

M Industrial-M .
N Harper-Brushixed use Ar••

Residential Area

1 lf'ICII • 2000 ti .

AREA

�..
t

II
VAC

RM
:• RLM

Ca" ,tt

RM

I
:,

I :o
N :o
D

MIDDLE

G

WDDDWAAD

• N • •ALIZIID

EXISTING LAND USE
RL-1o, Dma1ty - RLM- . - . . . Dma1ty ~
RM-_,_ Dma1ty -..imcial
RH.,._ty --.1&amp;1

Ki"'

SRC- si,oc&amp;1

~-..i.

INST-,-,.tut.la&gt;al
IND- - . i . ~
U: IND- Uqt,c ~

TAC-

fllorov,g:htare .. • idu.tial-cmaercial

MC-,..Jcro:..&lt;d&amp;l

SC-5-ial-.:l.ol
RLC- ~ -

GC- - . i . CC--o.-=-a1
MUR-..,_u.~
MP- tu.Jor Park
RC- Racreauon

0S•Open

Sp.a""

OSI- Ope n S p&amp;ce- In st1.tuuona l
VAC· Y•e•n&lt;

CEM·c.-ar,,

~

&amp;n~•~

LJ
cu

1 inch •2000 fl .

WOODWARD

MIDDLE

AREA

WDDDWAAD

-• N • -Au:zaD
PROPCSED LAND UB

•

RL - i-o.am.t:y~
RLM-~•~tr~
RM.~--.cy~
RH- ltL4h 0111m.e, - - . w
SRC- _,, _ _ .. ,,_,_
INST--.--,
IND---...
LJ:INO-,..,.,.---..
TRC- fltorouo,htare -•MNau.a1-c-rcal

MC--sc._,..,.,_....,

RLC-_...,._.~
QC.--,.__,

cc-- -

MUA-...---

RC· ...erwauon
POS-

,.__,._t.

OSI· O,.ri
V-

o,en •...-

S pac-9•lna u t.ut 1on.a ~

V.acan t.

CEM·--,,

*·

P1ayU.a14

• - Tra.n..u .t Stat i on
(G.nar&amp;l Locauon )

~

&amp;n~t~

1 Inch • 2000 fl .

LJ

ru.....

.-=
WOODWARD

Middle Woodward Subarea ••••••.••.• 311-10

III-167A

AREA

�..

--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIQES

WOODWARD AREA

MIDDLE WOODWARD SUBAREA BOONDAR.I.ES .AND FEATURES

The area is bounded by Highland Park, Chrysler Freeway, Ford
Freeway, and Lodge Freeway.
Ma-j-or features include the New - ·Center and Boston-Edison neighborhood.
Wayne State and the
Cultural Center are located immediately to the south.
The New Center_ is, after the . Central Business District,
Detroit's second most important commercial concentration and
employer, including major off ices, a hotel, and retailing.
Some industry remains, especially office-related such as
printing.
The North Industrial area along Oakland is being
developed with new industry.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING ISSUES, MIDDLE WOODWARD SUBAREA

The greatest part of the housing stock in the Middle Woodward
Subarea is in good condition, even in neighborhoods where a
significant amount of abandonment has occurred.
In certain
places, compatible infill construction could make use of
vacant land. Very little relocation from development pressure
should occur in this subarea. Senior citizen housing, other
high-density housing,
mixed-use structures,
and
better
neighborhood shopping all should be developed along and near
Woodward Avenue.
There has been a concentration of group homes in the area,
which concerns many, also. There will continue to be a wide
range of incomes and social groups in the area with different
needs.
The impact of the three rapid transit stops, Woodward at
Clai rmount/Holbrook, Woodward at Grand Boulevard, and Woodward
at Webb is projected to be very great as far as stabilizing
the nearby residential neighborhoods and stimulating housing
development and rehabilitation, but quite minimal as far as
actual change in land use patterns.
In addition, commercial development is anticipated to be
stimulated by the transit development. Any new construction
near the transit stations would occur either directly along
or close to the current Woodward frontage.
Parking at these
stations should be limited to a few drop-off spaces.
Neighborhood commercial development is seen as a priority to
the neighborhoods above the New Center. The viable commercial
developments along Woodward should be upgraded, and the
3/90

III-168

�..

-·-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIQ:ES

WOODWARD AREA

operating stores which are community-oriented along Oakland
• and Hamil ton should be retained.
Institutional development is e-Kpected to increase.
Some
under-utilized
industrial
land
near
Unisys
(formerly
Burroughs) could be made available for an eventual expansion
of non-teaching facilities for Wayne State University.
The
New Center area will continue to be .developed, over time, to
a more attractive and cohesive district.
Outside of the
immediate core area at Second and West Grand Boulevard, the
area is characterized by many surface parking lots and
underutilized industrial buildings.
MIDDLE WOODWARD SUBAREA GOALS

The New Center area will become a more intense and cohesive
commercial and office area and the new development in the New
Center Commons area will be completed. These factors and the
light rail system along Woodward will make the Middle Woodward
subarea, with its basically sound and stable residential
areas, an attractive location.
Improvements in the Middle
Woodward Subarea include the needs of existing residents for
home maintenance and commercial and recreational facilities.
POLICY 311-10:

A.

Middle Woodward Subarea Policies

Webb-Woodland Area (Highland Park, City limit, Oakland,
Boston-Edison northern boundary, Lodge Freeway)

Retain, improve, and conserve existing housing units. Develop
new housing and related commercial uses.
Discourage lowdensity, automobile dependent development in anticipation of
the proposed light rail transit system with a station at
Woodward and Webb/Woodland.
Encourage the development of a
convenience shopping center, including a supermarket. Correct
deteriorated conditions along and near Hamilton.
B.

North Industrial (City limit, railroad, Caniff, Oakland)

Develop as planned with office,
center facilities.
C.

manufacturing,

and service

Boston-Edison and Arden Park Historic District
(Subdivision boundaries)

Continue to maintain and preserve the historic houses and to
enforce the Historic Ordinance.
3/90

III-169

�..
----.-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIJ;IES

D.

WOODWARD AREA

Gladstone Residential Ar.ea
(southern Boston-Edison
boundary, Woodward, Clairmount, western edge of Woodward
frontage, south side of Euclid, Lodge Freeway)

Stabilize the neighborhood through housing and apartment
conservation and removal of blighted and abandoned buildings.
Provide careful monitoring of adult foster care homes in this
area and prevent an undesirable concentration.
E.

Woodward · Frontage ( both ;:&gt;ides of Woodward frontage
between Clairmount and excluding northern Grand Boulevard
frontage, and also east side of Woodward between Arden
Park and Clairmount)

Retain the local retail and service function oriented to
surrounding neighborhoods.
Encourage construction of highdensity housing along Woodward. Discourage automobile service
uses.
Insure high standards of development compatible with
existing uses.
F.

·0ia

Brush-Holbrook Residential (southern boundary of Arden
Park, western boundary of Oakland frontage, Euclid,
eastern boundary of Woodward frontage)

Remove or update blighted, abrasive commercial uses along
Oakland and John R.
Remove or upgrade blighted abandoned
buildings within the neighborhood. Provide more shopping and
open space in this area or nearby.
G.

Oakland Avenue Frontage (both frontages
between Arden Park and Grand Boulevard)

of

Oakland

Retain the service and commercial character but on a reduced
basis.
Remove blighted and abrasive uses.
Consolidate
compatible and necessary commercial uses.
Provide locations
for additional commercial facilities with adequate parking and
screening.
H.

Holbrook-Cameron Residential Area
(Caniff,
Chrysler
Freeway, Grand Boulevard, and eastern edge of Oakland
frontage)

Prevent further deterioration of the neighborhood.
Clear
vacant abandoned structures.
North of Holbrook, provide a
combination of new housing and open space recreation,
including a small community area.

3/90

•

III-170

•

�..
~

I.

DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

WOODWARD AREA

New Center Commons ( southe-rn property line of Euclid
frontage, western property line of Woodward frontage,
southern edge of Seward, Second Avenue, northern property
line of Grand Boulevard frontage)

Complete the development of the area as planned, including
development on remaining vacant parcels and encourage eventual
expansion.
J.

Chandler-Beaubien Residencial Area
(Euclid, western
boundary of Oakland fronta~e, Grand Boulevard, eastern
property of Woodward frontage)

Maintain as a residential area, with as much conservation of
existing homes as is practical.
Provide that any new
development near Woodward and Grand Boulevard be of a high
intensity pedestrian-oriented nature in anticipation of a
light-rail transit station.
K.

New Center (eastern boundary of Woodward frontage,
railroad, Lodge Freeway, northern boundary of Grand
Boulevard frontage, Second Avenue, southern edge of
Seward frontage, western boundary of Woodward)

Increase major retail development.
Strengthen as an office
center and shopping area.
Increase structured parking.
Provide more functions and activities to make use of evenings
and weekends.
Downgrade Second Boulevard to a local street
north of Grand Boulevard. Encourage apartment development in
the northern portion of the area between Woodward and Second.
L.

Unisys (formerly Bur roughs) Area
Ford Freeway, Lodge Freeway)

(Railroad,

Woodward,

Encourage continuation and upgrading of light industrial,
commercial, and service uses.
Encourage technology and
research-oriented facilities or new housing, providing that
it is well-related to institutional or other residential uses.
M.

Industrial Mixed-Use Area ( Grand Boulevard, Chrysler
Freeway, Ford Freeway, Beaubien, Piquette, John R,
Woodward)

Continue as an industrial and commercial district. Encourage
high-density residential or other uses along East Grand
Boulevard related to the proposed transit station. Encourage
increased employment in the area.
3/90

III-171

�•

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIQES
N.

Harper-Brush Residential -(Piquette,
Freeway, Woodward)

WOODWARD AREA

Beaubien,

Ford

Maintain existing housing.

3/90

III-172

�..
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLu:;[ES

DEFINITIONS

ARTICLE 401
LAND USE DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS

INTRODUCTION

The land use categories used -on all the maps herein are
generalized.
Boundaries are not meant to be precise as to
blocks or property lines.
Categories are descriptive of
general development, recognizing that some intermixtures are
permissible or desirable.
Residential areas shown include
schools, churches, and playgrounds.
They include retail
establishments which are small, strictly neighborhood-oriented
and nonabrasive.
Other forms of intermixture may include
institutional uses where such uses are compatible within a
commercial designation: commercial within industrial uses,
etc. The residential land use categories designate a general
residential density for neighborhoods, but intermixture of
compatible buildings at a lesser or greater density is not
considered undesirable.
POLICY 401-1: Residential areas. The Existing General Land
Use and Future General Land Use maps show six categories of
residential areas.
A.

Low-density single-family residential areas should have
an overall density up to 12 dwelling uni ts per net
residential
acre
and
provide
conservation
and
reinforcement
for
existing
viable
residential
development.
All new housing should be developed
compatibly with existing housing and should consist of
predominantly one- and two-family structures, with some
one-family attached townhouses and apartments.

B.

Low-medium density residential areas should have an
overall density of 13 to 20 dwelling uni ts per net
residential
acre
and
provide
conservation
and
reinforcement
for
existing
viable
residential
development.
All new housing should be developed
compatibly with existing housing and should consist of
predominantly one-family attached townhouses and some
apartments.

3/90

IV-1

�..

--·

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIJ;IES

DEFINITIONS

c.

Medium-density residential-areas should have an overall
density of 21 to 30 dwelling units per net residential
acre and provide conservation and reinforcement for
existing viable residential:-development. All new housing
should be developed compatibly with existing housing and
should consist of predominantly one-family attached
townhouses and apartments two stories and above.

D.

High-density residential areas should have an overall
density o·f 30 or more dwelting units per net residential
acre and provide conservation and reinforcement for
existing viable residential development. All new housing
should consist predominantly of apartments and some onefamily attached townhouses.

E.

Special
residential-commercial
areas
( predominantly
residential) should provide for new high- and medium-rise
apartments developed compatibly with general commercial
and/or institutional uses, and also should provide
conservation and reinforcement for existing viable
residential development. These areas should be located
along major radial thoroughfares, or at a major gateway
into the City or major centers where the intersection of
freeways and major thoroughfares have off and on ramps
in each direction, provided that these areas are served
by, support, and complement an area of major commercial
activity such as downtown Detroit ( Central Business
District), New Center, or other employment centers. New
apartment development should be above and/or alongside
the compatible general commercial and/or institutional
uses so that both gain accessibility and/or exposure by
a thoroughfare frontage location.

F.

Residential/local
commercial
(thoroughfare
residential/commercial) provides for the
day-to-day consumer goods and services required to serve
a small residential area.
High traffic-generating and
traffic-oriented uses should be restricted in these areas
because of their undesirable influence upon adjacent
residential areas.
This land use category is designed to be used primarily
on major or secondary thoroughfares wherein the major use
of
the property would be for
low-medium density
residential
dwellings
characterized
primarily
by
apartment dwellings.

3/90

IV-2

�..

--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIJ;IES

DEFINITIONS

The category includes multiple-family dwellings, attached
and
two-family
dwellings,
and
certain
other
residentially-related uses which can function most
advantageously when located on these thoroughfares.
OthEr uses which may be app,ropriate include medical and
dental clinics, motels or hotels, and certain types of
non-profit uses.

n __
~

POLICY 401-2: Residential-Conditional Industrial Areas.
In
residential areas of the City which are proposed for industry
on Master Plan maps, the City ~hould insure that the wellbeing of the residents is protected while still providing for
further industrial development necessary for employment, tax
base, and industrial services and products.
METHODS:

Expansion of industrial activity into such residential
areas should occur from the edges of the- existing
industrial area outward, and should occur in a manner
which protects the remaining residential area from
nuisances or dangers such as excess heat, light, sound,
radiation, odor, smoke, dust, and traffic.
Residents should be protected through the regulations of
the Zoning Ordinance against the further location of
industrial activity in the interior of residential areas.
POLICY 401-3: Differing structure tYPes. In situations where
the policy is to promote the improvement of a residential
neighborhood
through
the
introduction
of
residential
structures which are different from the existing structures,
the existing homes should be protected and all new development
should be made compatible with them.
POLICY 401-4:
A.

3/90

Commercial areas.

Major commercial areas consist of a high concentration
of office activity and related supporting services;
retail trade at the comparison shopping level (includes
neighborhood shopping and local commercial as well);
specialized shops, stores, and services which require a
large population to support them; and high-rise and
medium-rise apartments and hotels. The level of activity
is generally region-wide in service areas with offices
and headquarters relating to State,
national,
and
international operations.
The primary focus should be
an office employment center.

IV-3

�..
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF .POL~ES

. DEFINITIONS

Major commercial areas should be located so as to be
highly accessible from the City and the region by
freeways, major thoroughfares, and mass transit.

~ --

Major commercial areas sheuld be developed at a high
intensity in order that a large number of activities can
take advantage of the location and linkages between
activities can be strengthened.
Multi-use structures
combining office, retail, and residential activities are
appropriate. Parking structures and mass transit service
should be used as a means ~f achieving compact, intense
development. Ground level activity should be pedestrian,
shopping, and entertainment oriented so as to achieve
maximum utilization of the concentration of public and
private development.
Detroit has two major commercial areas:
(CBD) and the New Center.
B.

downtown Detroit

Special
commercial-residential
areas
(predominantly
commercial) consist of either a major office headquarters
complex, an international gateway, or a major spectator
sport or convention facility of regional significance,
with
supporting
office
and
service
activities,
apartments, and their necessary service facilities.
Special commercial-residential areas should possess
excellent accessibility by freeways, major thoroughfares,
and mass transit.

Special commercial-residential areas should be developed
with a compatible mixture of uses that require excellent
accessibility and/or the proximity to special features
described above. Typical special commercial-residential
uses, in addition to the major facility, are medium-rise
off ices, motels, restaurants, major ins ti tut ions, and
medium- and high-rise apartments.
The mixture of uses
to be encourage in special commercial-residential areas
may vary in relation to the particular location and major
activity, but the area should retain a commercial (work
place) predominance and focus.
It is desirable to have
at least 20 percent of the floor area in a special
commercial-residential area devoted to medium- and highrise apartments, developed compatibly above or alongside
commercial uses so as to obtain maximum access and
exposure to the major commercial or institutional
development.
Wherever
feasible,
existing
viable
residential
development
should
be
retained
and
reinforced.
IV-4

3/90

- -- -

.

------

-

-

-

- --·

�..

-·-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLJJ:lES

DEFINITIONS

C.

General commercial areas consist of low-intensity retail
_ and wholesale uses along major thoroughfares which are
suitable for
business,
warehouse,
and some light
industrial activit~es. Typical general commercial uses
are automobile and furni tur~- sales rooms and repair shops,
business services, building and contractor offices, and
wholesale distributors.
_ Some local commercial and
multiple residential uses may also locate with advantage
in these areas.
General commercial uses that have no
marked adverse affect on residential areas can locate in
areas which adjoin residential and special residentialcommercial areas. General-commercial uses that, because
of the nature of their business and/or operational
characteristics,
have a marked adverse affect
on
residential areas, should locate in those areas that are
separated from residential development by freeways and
major thoroughfares.

D.

Comparison ·shopping centers are those
that
offer
merchandise for sale in major department stores or stores
of a national or chain type, and where there are several
stores in the area selling the same type of merchandise
which would enable the shopper to make comparisons before
buying.

POLICY 401-5:
Industrial areas.
The industrial portion of
the Existing General Land Use and
Future General Land Use
maps shows four categories of industrial use.
A.

industrial areas should consist of areas for
light and heavy industrial uses which include producing,
assembling
components
and
parts,
packaging,
and
warehousing.
Small-scale industrial uses are light
machine
shops,
clothing,
furniture,
appliance
manufacturing, etc., usually located on small sites.
Large-scale industrial uses are auto manufacturing,
structural steel fabrication, chemical plants, power
plants, etc., which are characterized by large sites and
considerable traffic flow.
General

General industrial areas should have accessibility to a
freeway or a major thoroughfare within five minutes
surface travel time.
Main line rail should be in the
vicinity with spurs easily provided, if needed.
B.

3/90

Light industrial areas should generally consist of areas
for industrial uses whose performance characteristics are
such that they have minimum undesirable effects on

IV-5

�..
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:o;:IES

DEFINITIONS .

adjacent residential activity.
Thus, light industrial
areas should be located as ...buffer areas between areas of
general industry and residential areas, or in other areas
where high performance qualities are required.

C.

Port industrial areas
Owner-use port terminals.
Should consist of general
areas along the Detroit and Rouge Rivers for the use of
industries requiring wharves, docks and piers exclusively
for the handling of their own raw and finished material
or products.
For-hire port terminals. Should consist of those watershipping terminals whose facilities are available to the
general public.
(Almost all overseas cargo ships use
these facilities, which handle general cargo, bulk cargo,
and have an international trade zone of four to five
acres.)

D.

Distribution industrial areas
Should generally consist of areas for uses concerned with
the handling,
storage, and movement of goods and
materials.
Typical uses are transportation terminals,
wholesale and warehouse facilities, maintenance and
service uses, goods packing and processing uses, and
supporting office and service uses.
Goods distribution areas require excellent accessibility
by freeways and major thoroughfares to the major goods
pick-up and delivery areas of the City and region. They
may be served with advantage by other transportation
modes for the interchange of freight.
The centrally located goods distribution areas should be
developed with the more intense goods distribution uses
that serve the businesses and industries of the regional
core.
The outlying goods distribution areas should
accommodate less intense uses that relate to a larger
service area.

POLICY 401-6:
A.

3/90

Recreational and institutional areas

Major park is a large open area which preserves the
natural scenic beauty of woodland, meadow, river valley,
or lake front. Major parks often have botanical gardens,
zoological exhibits, nature trails, bicycle trails,
outdoor amphitheaters, model yacht basins, and facilities
IV-6

�..
_THE _DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLu:;:[ES

DEFINITIONS-·

for group picnics and winter sports. Major parks often
have a golf course and bri~le trails.
There is a need for large parks within the City in
addition to and supplementing metropolitan or regional
parks, such as Belle Isle and Rouge Park.
Metropolitan or regional parks often offer camping,
fishing,
hiking,
trail-side
museums,
wildlife
sanctuaries, swimming, sailing, or canoeing.
Space for
these activities can occasionally be provided in large
parks within the City, such as in Belle Isle and Rouge
Park, as well as along the Detroit riverfront.
The major park should be large enough to become a real
opening or break in the surrounding urban development,
giving a
sense of uninterrupted natural
terrain.
Usually, a fairly compact area of at least 250 acres is
necessary before a natural scenic character can be
established.
When parks are located along the Detroit River, these
objectives can also be met with even smaller sites
because of the wide expanse of the River. The need for
large parks is also measured in terms of acreage per
thousand persons within the area to be served. Standards
of the National Recreation Association suggest that there
should be seven acres of open land for every thousand
persons.
While it is recognized that some of this
acreage may be supplied in regional forest reserves or
camping areas at some distance from the community to be
served, at least four acres per thousand should be at the
edge of the community and accessible for frequent use.
The overall standard for major parks shall be 2.6 acres
per thousand persons within the City of Detroit.
B.

Recreation areas indicated on the map are over 10 acres
in size and serve playfield or passive park functions.
Occasionally, plazas and large meeting areas are also
indicated because of their importance.

C.

Institutional areas include schools, colleges, churches,
government offices, etc., irrespective of public, semipublic, or private ownership.

D.

Open space includes large open areas with use not
specified but usually available to the general public.

3/90

IV-7

�..
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL:i.IES

DEFINITIONS

E.

Cemetery includes burial areas.

F.

Public wharf areas consist of transient marina facilities
and related commercial and entertainment establishments.
Offices and apartments ab011'e and nearby these areas are
highly appropriate. Nautical theme restaurants, lounges,
and retail shops are an integral part of this complex.
Public wharf areas are located at the River's edge and
beyond the current harborline, wherever feasible, in
areas of good thoroughfare access with parking facilities
nearby. Public recreation-facilities in adjacent areas
would be highly desirable.-

3/90

IV-8

�.
THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

DEFINITIONS

SUMMARY OF RECREATION FACILITY DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS
FACILITY
TYPE &amp;
PRINCIPAL
FUNCTION

ACRES
PER
1,000
PEOPLE

ADDITIONAL
FUNCTION

SIZE
RANGE

TRAVEL
DISTANCE

Provide
semi-active
play
for adults.

3-7 ac.

1/4-1/2
mile

1

Provide
playground
facilities.

10-20 ac.
&amp; 20
&amp; over

1-1 1/4

1-1/2

Provide
playground
&amp; playfield
facilities.

60 ac.
&amp; up
(less
on
riverfront.

Playground
Provide
active play
facilities
for 5-24
group.
Playfield
Field sports
facilities
for youth and
adults.
Semi-active
&amp; passive
use facilities
for all age
groups.

Not
applicable.

Major Park
Semi-active
&amp; passive use
facilities
for adults.
Active uses
for the
younger age
groups.

3/90

3 miles

3

on
public
transit
line
&amp;

IV-9

�•

111,.:-,-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLIJ:lES

TRAFFICWAYS

ARTICLE 402
TRAFFICWAYS DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS

INTRODUCTION
The transportation system as shewn in the Future Land Use map
includes routes for limited access freeways and a network of
major and secondary thoroughfares consisting principally of
existing surface streets, some of which need widening or
extension to increase their traffic capacity.
A light rail rapid transit system is proposed to complement
and support other City systems. The trafficways plan includes
standards for each type of thoroughfare.
The trafficways plan is a comprehensive coordinated system
which
is
a
long-term
basis
for
highway
and
street
improvements.
The Future General Land Use map does not
include local service and feeder streets whose design is
determined by the local area to be served.
The Future General Land
transportation facilities.

Use

map

shows

six

types

of

POLICY 402-1:
Freeways.
Freeways are highways especially
designed for carrying an uninterrupted flow of through
traffic.
They are distinguished from other arteries by the
following three design features:
-Access limited to a relatively small number
specially designed points of entrance and exit;

of

-Continuous physical separation of opposing directions
of traffic;
-Separation of grades at all intersections.
POLICY 402-2: Major thoroughfare. Major thoroughfares are
the principal surface streets.
Access is not limited, but
special attention is given to the safe and expeditious
movement of through traffic.

3/90

IV-10

�..

-

. TRAFFICWAYS

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLu:lES

In order to meet the requirement.s of safety and convenience,
, major thoroughfares should have a central dividing strip wide
enough t~ protect pedestrians and to faci~itate left turns and
cross traffic.
The network of major thoroughfares consists principally of
existing streets: six radial routes and a gridiron system of
roads spaced about one mile apart.
These are generally
existing routes, some of which have been improved under the
plan of thoroughfares of 1925 -and also under the Detroit
Master Plan since 1947.
POLICY
402-3:
Secondary
thoroughfare.
Secondary
thoroughfares are shorter or less continuous surface streets
on which special attention is given to the safe and
expeditious movement of through traffic. They are frequently
the route for feeder transit lines. Some pleasure drives ad
parkways not intended to carry commercial traffic are included
as secondary thoroughfares in the Master Plan.
Secondary thoroughfares generally require a single roadway
with two moving lanes and two parking lanes. The network of
secondary thoroughfares consists principally of existing
streets.
POLICY 402-4:

Collector.

POLICY 402-5:
Park drive treatment.
Park drive treatment
refers to features applicable to those trafficways designated
as part of a parkway-like system which would be especially
designed to provide access to parks and other community
facilities, provide a pleasant driving experience, with
special views, where possible, and provide a stimulus for
private and public development.

Required features of park drive treatment are:
1.

Adequate
strips

landscape

treatment,

facilities,

2.

Minimum of four moving lanes for traffic

3.

Adequate parking

and

splash

Optional features are:
1.

Truck prohibition

2.

Service roads

3/90

IV-11

�.
--·-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLICIES

TRAFFICWAYS

3.

Nine-foot parking lanes

4.

Parking bays or lots

5.

Varying types of landscaping and widths for medians and
margins

6.

Special setback,
controls

height,

bulk,

and

structural

type

POLICY 402-6: Pedestrian/bicycle path - a pedestrian/bicycle
path should generally have a minimum width of 19 feet to allow
for a
bicycle path,
a pedestrian walk,
and adequate
landscaping where feasible.
POLICY 402-7: Standard widths for component parts of freeway
cross sections.

Total right-of-way:
3 lanes in each direction ....•....•............

Feet
320 to 380

Lanes and roadway, total each direction:

3 lanes in each direction ...............•.•....

56

Each moving lane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12

Margin for emergency stops (10 ft. each side)

20

Center mall:
Total to divide traffic ....••.................

24

Slopes:
To maintain maximum slope at 1 to 2 ••..•.••.

25 to 50

Variable in accordance with elevation.
Service drives, sidewalks, and margins:
Total width of each side where service
drive is necessary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53

Each moving lane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15

Margin on 1 e ft s id e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . .

8

Margin on right side including sidewalk ....•.

15

3/90

IV-12

�.
...,.,.

~

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLigES

TRAFFICWAYS

Modified freeways... provide grade _,.separation and limited access
, at only selected major intersections. Special provision for
off-street parking and reducing the number of local street
intersections may be required -at other selected locations
also.
POLICY 402-8:

Standard widths for component parts of major

thoroughfares.

Total right-of-way:
8 lane
6 lane

.......................................
.......................................

Feet
138
116

Lanes and roadway
4 lane . ...................................... .

44

3 1 a ne ••..•.•....•.•...••.••••.•••.•.•..•••••

33

First moving lane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13

Each additional moving lane •.................

11

.................................

9

Parking lane
Center island:

Total to divide traffic, protect pedestrians
and facilitate left turns
At signals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16

AT other crossings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20

To protect pedestrians ......•.................

10

To protect crossing movements ................ .

20

Sidewalks and margin:
Total sidewalk and margin
Sidewalk in residential or light industrial
Sidewalk in business or heavy industrial ..... .

3/90

15
6

15

IV-13

�-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN .OF POLI.CIES

TRAFFICWAYS

POLICY
402-9:
Secondary -thoroughfares.
thoroughfares will normally have two traffic
parking on each side.
Right-of-way width of
sufficient for this purpose.

Secondary
lanes with
66 feet is

3/90

..

IV-14 ·

-

-

· -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----

-

-

-

-

~

�---

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

DEFINITIONS

Article 403

ZONING DEFINITIONS

INTRODUCTION
'
The following zoning district
definitions are taken from the
Detroit Zoning Ordinance. All references to specific zoning
districts within the Master Plan of Policies use these
definitions.

POLICY 403-1:

Residential Districts

A.

Rl Single-family residential district: This district is
designed to preserve quiet, low-density residential areas
now primarily developed and those areas which will be
developed with single-family detached dwellings and
characterized by a high ratio of home ownership.
The
regulations for this district are designed to stabilize
and protect the essential characteristics of the district
and to promote and encourage a suitable environment for
activities associated with family life. To these ends,
development is limited to a relatively low concentration
and uses permitted as a matter of right are limited to
single-family detached dwellings providing homes for the
residents of the area.
Additional related residential
uses
such as
religious
institutions,
neighborhood
centers, and utility uses necessary to serve the
immediate area may be permitted with approval.

B.

R2 Two-family residential district.
This district is
designed to protect and enhance those areas developed or
likely to develop with single- or two-family dwellings.
The district regulations are designed to promote a
suitable environment for homes and for activities
connected with family life. The only uses permitted as
a matter of right are single- and two-family dwellings.
Additional uses are permitted with approval.

C.

R3 Low-density residential district.
This district is
designed as a low-density multiple-family district
providing densities of approximately 30 units per acre.
The regulations are designed to promote and encourage
town or terrace house development, courts, and garden
apartments.
It is intended that this district be used

3/90

.

-

IV-15

-

-------_

�---

THE.DETROIT .MASTER PLAN OF POLu::IES

DEFINITIONS

primarily on local thorougt.fares, thereby encouraging a
suitable environment for family life. Uses permitted as
a matter of right include single- and two-family
dwellings, townhouses, muttiple-f amily dwellings, and
community facilities necessary to serve a residential
district.

D.

R4 Thoroughfare residential district. This district is
designed to be used primarily on major or secondary
thoroughfares wherein the major use of the property would
be
for
low-medium
den5ity
residential
dwellings
characterized, primarily by rental apartment dwellings.
Uses permitted as a matter of right include multiplefamily dwellings, single- and two-family dwellings, and
certain other residentially-related uses which can
function most advantageously when located on these
thoroughfares.
Medical and dental clinics, motels or
hotels, and certain types of non-profit uses may be
permitted with approval subject to appropriate findings
and compliance with required standards.

E.

RS Medium-density residential district.
This district
is designed to provide for a range of residential
development from the single-family detached dwelling to
medium-density multiple-family dwellings.
The primary
use in this district will be the rental apartment
structu r e.
In addition to permitted residential uses,
certain specified non-residential uses which can be
properly blended into this district may be permitted.

F.

R6 High-density residential district. This district is
designed as a high-density multiple-dwelling district to
be used primarily in areas adjacent to the Central
Business District, the New Center area, the Cultural
Center, the waterfront, certain large City parks, and
other areas which have a high concentration of persons
and land values.
This district will permit a range of
living accommodations, from the low-density dwelling up
to very high-density dwellings, including institutions
and residentially-related uses, and will permit certain
specified service and convenience-type commercial uses
of a character unlikely to develop excessive traffic but
which will serve the residents of the immediate area.
Single-family detached and two-family dwellings will not
be permitted in this district as a matter of right but
may be allowed as permitted with approval uses.

3/90

•

IV-16

------ -----

.

�--

THE - DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES
POLICY 403-2:

DEFINITIONS

Business District.s

A.

Bl Restricted business district.
The Bl District is
d~igned to provide an adequately controlled transition
in land use from residential to business and commercial
uses, and is mapped accordingly.
Permitted uses are
limited to those which are desirable and can be fitted
into such a transitional pattern of land use.
Front,
side, and rear yards are required of all permitted uses,
both residential and coIIllllercial, subject to possible
adjustment by the Buildings and Safety Engineering
Department in cases where this is desirable to achieve
a better blending in the pattern of physical development.
To protect adjacent housing, a lot line wall is required
of nonresidential uses where- adjacent to resident
property, again with provision for Buildings and Safety
Engineering Department adjustment where desirable.

B.

B2 Local business and residential district. The B2 Local
Business and Residential District provides for the dayto-day consumer goods and services required to serve a
small residential area.
High traffic-generating and
traffic-oriented uses are restricted because of their
obvious undesirable influence on adjacent residential
areas.

C.

B3 Shopping district. The B3 Shopping District provides
for a range of convenience and comparison shopping goods
stores, generally grouped into neighborhood and community
shopping centers, depending on the size of the area so
mapped. Uses permitted are inclusive enough to allow for
the provisions of a broad range of goods and services for
the consumer, and to allow for as much freedom and
healthy competition in the commercial real estate market
and commercial activities as is consonant with other
community values.

D.

B4 General business district.
The B4 General Business
District provides for business and commercial uses of a
thoroughfare-oriented nature. In addition to these uses,
other businesses which may benefit by drawing part of
their clientele from passing traffic are permitted.
Additional uses which may be successfully blended with
those uses permitted as a matter of right are permitted
with approval.

3/90

IV-17

�-

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POL~ES

DEFINITIONS

E.

BS Major business district- This district is designed
to provide adequate regulations within the Central
Business District, the New Center area, and may be
successfully utilized in-other regionally oriented
shopping and office areas.

F.

B6 General services district.
This district provides
for wholesaling, transport, food services, and similar
activities essential to the commerce and health of the
City. Office, retail, service, and other uses normally
desiring to locate in thi"s type of district are also
permitted.

POLICY 403-3:

Industrial Districts

A.

Ml limited industrial district.
This district is used
primarily along major and secondary thoroughfares in
blocks which contain older, vacant structures, mixed land
uses, or other deficiencies, and in which the Master Plan
indicates industrial development to be the desirable
ultimate use. The purpose of the district is to permit
these vacant structures to be used for necessary economic
activities, and to encourage the transition of the area
to warehousing, wholesaling, and light industrial uses.

B.

M2 Restricted industrial district.
This district is
designed for a wide range of industrial and related uses
which can function with a minimum of undesirable effects.
Industrial establishments of this type provide a buffer
between residential districts ahd intensive industrial
districts. New residential construction is excluded from
this district, with the exception of loft conversions of
existing buildings, within the area bounded ·by the
Detroit River, East Grand Boulevard, and West Grand
Boulevard,
following
review and
approval
of
the
Department of Buildings and Safety Engineering.
These
requirements are
to both protect
residences
from
undesirable environment and to insure reservation of
adequate areas for industrial development.

C.

M3 General industrial district.
This district is
composed of property so situated as to be suitable for
industrial development, but where the modes of operation
of the industry may affect any nearby residential uses.
The purposes of this district is to permit the normal
operation of a majority of industries, subject only to
those regulations needed to control congestion and to
protect nearby residential districts. No new residential

3/90

IV-18

�--

TBE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLil;IES

DEFINITIONS

construction is permitted_in this district with the
exception of loft conversions of existing buildings
within the area bounded by the Detroit River, East Grand
Boulevard, and West Grand Beulevard, following review and
approval of the Department of Buildings and Safety
Engineering.
These
requirements
are
to
protect
residences from undesirable environment and to insure
reservation of adequate areas for industrial development.

D.

Intensive industrial d:tstr ict.
This district will
permit uses which are usual~y objectionable, and because
of this t he district is rarely, if ever, located adjacent
to residential districts.
A broad range of uses is
permitted in this district.
New residences are
prohibited, with the exception of loft conversions of
existing buildings, within the area bounded by the
Detroit River, East Grand Boulevard, and West Grand
Boulevard,
following
review
and
approval
of
the
Department of Buildings _and Safety Engineering.
These
requirements are to protect residences from undesirable
environment, and to insure reservation of adequate areas
for industrial development.

M4

Policy 403-4:

Special Districts

A.

PD Planned development district.
This district will
permit planned developments throughout the City and will
be particularly useful in urban renewal areas.
Such
planned developments shall be substantially in accord
with the goals and objectives of the Master Plan, having
a major land use which corresponds to the most general
category of land use, i.e., residential, business,
industrial, etc., proposed in the Master Plan for the
area involved, and satisfying criteria for development
as stated in the City Planning Commission regulations.
Such planned developments shall provide a desirable
environment for the uses proposed and shall not be out
of harmony with their general surroundings.
The
regulations of the district are designed to accomplish
this by permitting flexibility in overall development
while insuring adequate safeguards and standards for
public health, safety, convenience, and general welfare.

B.

Pl Open parking district. This district is designed for
off-street parking of private passenger vehicles on
property which abuts, or is separated by, an alley or
easement
from
a
non-residential
district·.
The
regulations
permit
the
establishment
of
parking

3/90

IV-19

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF EOLI.CIES

DEFINITIONS

facilities to serve the non:residential uses and, at the
same time, do not permit the non-residential uses per se
to extend into residential areas.
The district will
assist in reducing traff i~ congestion caused by nonresidential uses and, at the same time, will protect
abutting residential areas-from the deleterious effects
of adjacent vehicular parking areas.
C.

PC Public center district. This district includes areas
used, or to be used, for governmental, recreational, and
cultural purposes of pa-rticular or special civic
importance. All construction or other improvement within
this district requires Community and Economic Development
Department and City Planning Commission review and
recommendation so as to insure a completely harmonious,
pleasing, and functional public center.

D.

PCA Restricted central business district. This district
includes property in close proximity to the Public Center
District, and the controls specified herein are designed
to prevent any uses or structures within the district
from having a deleterious effect upon the public center.

E.

TM Transitional-industrial district.
This district is
a special transitional district covering areas currently
developed with a mixture of uses, among which is a
relatively large amount of residential use and which the
Master Plan of Land Use indicates is to be developed
eventually in industrial uses. The district regulations
provide for a guided change to the terminal land use,
while at the same time protecting, as much as possible,
the existing residential development. No new residential
development will be permitted in this district; however,
the existing
residential development
will
not
be
considered non-conforming.
As the area changes from a
residential to a non-residential character, a rezoning
to the appropriate industrial classification will be
effectuated.

F.

PR Parks and recreation.
The intent of the Parks and
Recreation District is to retain,
insofar as
is
practicable and desirable, publicly owned lands in excess
of four acres in size already improved for or intended
to be improved for recreational uses and/or to be
preserved as open space.
The restrictions of this
classification are intended to encourage preservation of
these lands and to permit development in keeping with the
natural amenities of these areas.
In addition · to those

3/90

IV-20

�--

THE DETROIT MASTER PLAN OF POLJJ:IES

DEFINITIONS

uses
allowed
as
a
matter
of
right,
commercial
recreational facilities may be permitted upon approval
of the City Council.

G.

Wl Waterfront-industrial district.
Because of the
limited amount of water J:rontage and the even more
limited amount of frontage that is suitable or adaptable
to shipping activities or other water-oriented uses,
these areas will be subject to controls that will provide
for their development witrr uses that must rely on, or
that will be benefitted most by such a location.

H.

SDl Special development district.
The SDl District is
designed for areas of the City in which there is much
investment interest and activity and great development
potential. Generally, in these areas, private developers
have been active in changing the character of the area
by increasing the intensity of development and converting
land . to higher intensity uses, both residential and
commercial.
The SDl District is designed to encourage
one portion of this development.
It will permit high
intensity residential development, with a carefully
controlled mix of low-rise office, commercial, and
service facilities.

I •

SD2 Special development district.
The SD2 District is
designed for areas of the City in which there is much
investment interest and activity and great development
potential. Generally, in these areas, private developers
have been active in changing the character of the area
by increasing the intensity of development and converting
land to higher intensity uses, both residential and
commercial.
The SD2 District is designed to encourage
one portion of this development.
It will permit highrise office and commercial structures, with a controlled
mix of transient and permanent residential facilities,
together
with
appropriate
service
and
retailing
facilities.

J.

SD3 Special development district.
The SD3 District is
designed for areas of the City in which research facility
development in a campus-like setting is practicable.

3/90

IV-21

�Detroit Master Plan of Policies
Appendix A

SUBJECT INDEX

Detroit Planning Department
April, 1990

�Policy
A

Airport Subsector •....................•.. 302-07
ARTS
Artists' living conditions ..•..••.•....
Ethnic and neighborhood arts .......•...
Financial support for arts
and culture .•••.•..•..••..•..........
Participation in arts..................
Public art.............................

201-19
201-17
201-20
201-16 .
203-30

B

Berry Subdivision Historic District ....• 203-12C
Boston-Edison Historic District ...•..•. 311-l0C
Boynton Subsector .••....•.•.••...•...... 309-16
Brightmoor Subsector .••....•.••.•.•..... 310- 9
Brooks Subsector •..•.................... 310-12
Burbank Subsector ••..................... 306-11
Butzel Subsector •..•.•.....•••.•...•.... 302- 8
C

Central Business District ....... 301-1 TO
Cerveny-Grandmont Subsector .........••...
Chadsey Subsector .••.....•.....•. ...•.....
Chandler Park Subsector ....•..•..........
Cody Subsector ...•.......................
Communications Technology ................
Condon Subsector .........................
Conner Subsector ...........•••...........
CRIME
Anti-crime legislation ......•.•........
Arson .•..•.•.....•..•....•.... 201-45 &amp;
Crime &amp; education .........•............
Crime prevention .......................
Crime victims .........................
Drug enforcement ..................•....
Juvenile court system ..................
Prison space ...........................

301-12
307- 9
309-14
302- 9
310-10
301- 5
309- 9
306-12
201-43
201-46
201-42
201-36
204-15
201-37
201-41
201-40

D

Davison Subsector ...•.................... 305- 9
Denby Subsecto r . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 6-13
Durfee Subsector ........................• 304- 9
E

East Sector ........•............. 302-1 to 302-6
East Central Sector •............. 303-1 to 303-7
East Riverside Subsector ........ .
302-10
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

�Business attraction &amp; retention ........
Cultural events •.•.•...•....•..........
Entertainment .••..•.•...•.......•...••
High technology ••••......•.•••........
Service industries .....•.........•....

204-14
202-10
202- 9
202-11
202- 7

Transit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203-43

See also:
Industry
Retail
EDUCATION

Access to post-secondary schools .......
Adult education .•.•..•....•......•....
Basic competency ........•...•.........
Continual education ................••.
Educational environment ..•....•.••.•.•

203-20
201- 5
201- 4
201- 1
201- 2

Job training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202- 4

Multifaceted education •••.•.••.••..•.•
Post-secondary education ....•..•......
Public school facilities .•......•....•
Public school financing .•••......•....
Quality education ••.....•.•.••.•......
Teaching culture &amp; values .•...........

201- 7
201- 6
203-19
204-14
201- 3
201- 8

ELDERLY PERSONS

Income and support .•......•........... 201-61
Independent living ..•....•............ 201-62
Woodward-senior citizens .............. 311- 8
Elmwood Park Redevelopment Area ........ .
EMPLOYMENT

Full employment ....•.................. 202- l
Job opportunities for women ........... 202- 6
Unemployment .......................... 204- 1
ENVIRONMENT

Air qua l i t y . . . . . . • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Climate &amp; urban design .......•........
Natural environment ...•.....•.........
Natural heritage •..................•.•

2 O3- 5 2
203-26
203-25
201-21

Odors . • • • • . . . . • • • • • . . . • • • . • . • . . . . . . . . . 2 0 3-5 3

Waste management ............ 203-54 to 203-56
Water quality ......................... 203-58
Evergreen Subsector •.................... 310- 7
F

FAMILY

Neighborhood environment ..............
Non-traditional households ............
Parenting skills ••....................
Social Services to families ...........
Working parents .......................
Finney Subsector ..•.....................
Foch Subsector ..........................
Forest Park Redevelopment Area ..........

201-55
201-55
201-57
201-54
201-60
306-14
302-11
303-09

�G

Grant Subsector .•..........•...........• 306- 9
Greenfield Subsector ............•..•.... 307- 6
H

HANDICAPPED PERSONS
Design elements (barriers) ....••.•••..
Equal employment opportunities •...•.••
Self-sufficiency •••...••••.•.••....•••
Transit access ••••••..•.........••.•.•
Harmony Village Subsector .........•.....

203-27
202- 5
201-52
203-41
307-10

HEALTH

Drug

&amp;

alcohol abuse ............•..... 201-28

Health care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201-31

Health system ..••..•......••........•.
Medical treatment ...•.....•..•...•..••
Mental health ...•.•.....•...•..•......
Protection of health ....••.••.........

201-30
201-27
201-29
201-26

Well-being . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201-32
HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Alternative uses •...••.....••.....•...
Design &amp; economic feasibility .•.......
Historic districts .•••.....•...•.•.•..
Significant buildings •..........••...•

203-33
203-31
203-32
201-18

HOMELESS PERSONS

Services for homeless . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HOUSING
Abandonment of property ...............
Existing housing stock ................
Heating costs .•....................•..
Home ownership ........................
Housing demand ........................
Housing supply .........................
Private sector reinvestment ...•.......
Public housing ...•••...............•..
Rental housing ..•...•.................
Residential land use definition .......
Residential zoning districts def ..•....
Hubbard-Richard/Corktown Subsector ...•..

201-56
203- 7
203- 6
203-10
202-18
202-18
203- 5
202-17
203- 8
203- 9
401- 1
403- l
309-12

I

Indian Village Historic District ....... 302-12A
Indian Village Subsector ............... 302-12
INDUSTRY

Industrial areas . .................... .
Industrial areas, definition ........ .
Industrial districts, zoning ........ .
Industrial employer retention ....... .
Manufacturing employment ............ .
Relationship of indus. to residence ..

203-17
401- 5
403- 3
202-14
202-13
203-18

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Foreign competition ................... 204- 7
Free Trade Agreement .................. 204-23

�J

Jefferson-Chalmers Redevelopment Area .. 302-l0B
Jefferson-Mack Subsector ......••....... 302-13
Jeffries Subsector ..................... 309- 8
K

Kettering Subsector ........•.•.•.••..•.

302-14

L

LIBRARY
Access to facilities •...•.........•.•..
Financial support .•.............•.....
Technological innovation ............••
Lower East Central Subsector ...•.•......
Lower Woodward Subarea ..................

203-21
201- 9
201-10
303-10
311- 9

M

Mackenzie Subsector •.....................
McDougall-Hunt Redevelopment Area ••......
McNichols Subsector ...•.....•.•.....•...
Middle East Central Subsector ..•..•.....
Middle Woodward Subarea ...........•..•..
Milwaukee Junction Redevelopment Area ..•
Mt. Olivet Subsector •.•.......•.........

304- 7
307-11
303- 9
311-10
303- 8
306-10

N

Near East Riverfront Subsector .......... 303-11
Near Northwest Sector •......•... 304-1 to 304-6
NEIGHBORHOOD
Commercial recreation ................. 203-14
Image . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203-11

Neighborhood retail areas ............. 203-15
Neighborhood self-help ................ 201-50
Parking in neighborhood ............... 203-47
Stabilization ..•....•................. 201-51
Supportive environment ................ 201-53
Nolan Subsector ......................... 305- 7
North Industrial Redevelopment Area .... 311-l0B
North Sector ........••........... 305-1 to 305-5
Northeast Sector ................ 306-1 to 306-8
Northwest Sector ................ 307-1 to 307-5
0

p

Palmer Park Subsector .................... 307- 8
PARKING
Near East Riverfront parking ......... 303-llB
On-street loading ..................... 203-49
On-street parking ..................... 203-48
Open parking Pl zoning district ....... 403-48
Parking in neighborhoods .............. 203-47
Parking management ..•....•............ 203-46
Pembroke-Bagley Subsector ............... 307- 7

�Pershing Subsector ..•...................
PUBLIC SAFETY
Hazardous waste management .............
Police Department •.•....•.... 201-33 to
Trafficway safety .........•....•......
PUBLIC TRANSIT
Cost efficiency •.......•.•••••.••.••••
Design elements (public mass transit) .•
Economic development .............•....
Light rail transit system ..•..•.......
Transit access .••..........•..........

305- 8
203-57
201-35
203-39
203-42
203-27
203-43
203-44
203-41

Q
R

RECREATION
Coordination of resources •..........•. 203-24
Distribution of rec. resources •...••.. 203-23
Leisure time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201-11
Natural environment ........••......... 203-25
Public indoor recreation ....••..••.... 201-13
Public outdoor recreation ............. 201-12
Private recreation services .• 201-22,23,24,25
Recreational facilities coord •......... 201-14
Regional public parks ................. 204-19
Redford Subsector ..•.................... 310- 6
RETAIL
Business districts, zoning def ......... 403- 2
Central Business District retail ...... 301- 6
Commercial areas, definition .......... 401- 4
Commercial recreation •......... 203-14, 202-9
Commercial streets, design ............ 203-27
Comparison retail centers ............. 203-13
General commercial areas .............. 203-15
Major retail centers .•......•..•.•.... 203-12
Retail development .................... 202- 8
SD2 Special Commercial district ....... 403-41
Thoroughfare frontage ................. 203-16
RIVERFRONT AREA
Central Business District ....... 301-121, J, K
East Riverside ........................ 302-10
Hubbard-Richard/Corktown .............. 309-12
Indian Village ........................ 302-12
Near East Riverfront .................. 303-11
West Riverfront ....................... 309-15
Rosa Parks Subsector .................... 304-10
Rosedale Subsector ...................... 310- 8
Rouge Subsector ......................... 310-11
Russell Woods Subsector ................. 304- 8

s
Southwest Sector ................ 309-1 to 309-7
Springwells Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309-13
State Fair Subsector ..............•.... 305- 6

�-----------STATE OF MICHIGAN
State Fairgrounds .........•.•........
St. Jean Subsector ....•.........••.....

305- 6
302-15

T

Tireman Subsector ..•..•............•...

309-10

TRAFFICWAYS
Definitions &amp; Standards ....... 402-1 to 402-9
Design Elements (streets,
commercial streets) .....••..•....•.
203-27
Development tool .•..•................
203-38
Funding ...... ~ ...................... . 203-34
Infrastructure ...................... . 203-36
Neighborhoods &amp; Trafficways ......... .
203-35
Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
203-37
Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
203-39

TRANSPORTATION
Aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Bicycles ............................ .
Deregulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Freight transportation ...•.•...•....•
Pedestrian/Bicycle Path, def ......••••
Pedestrians ......................... .

203-50
203-51
204- 6
203-40
402- 6
203-45

SEE ALSO
Parking
Public Transit
Trafficways

u
Upper East Central Subsector .......... .

303- 8

URBAN DESIGN
Architectural compatibility ......... .
Climate &amp; Urban Design .............. .
Design Elements .....•..•.............
Natural environment .•............•...
Public Art . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • .
Vistas

203-29
203-26
203-27
203-25
203-30
203-28

V

VACANT PROPERTY
Abandonment of property ...........
Industrial site availability ......
Vacant land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vernor-Junction Subsector ...........
Virginia Park Redevelopment Area ....

.
.
.
.
.

203- 7
202-16
203- 2
309-11
304-10

w
West Riverfront Subsector ............
309-15
West Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310-1 to 310-5
Woodward Area ........•........ 311-1 to 311-8
X

�y

-

-

•

YOUTH
Adolescent
201-59
Elementary School Age .............. . 201-58

..........................

z
ZONING
New definitions/districts .•......•.. 203-63
Remapping of districts ..•.•.••.••••• 203-62
Zoning definitions ....•....• 403-1 to 403-4

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007754">
                <text>Detroit_Master-Plan-of-Policies_1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007755">
                <text>Detroit Department of Planning, City of Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007756">
                <text>1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007757">
                <text>Master Plan of Policies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007758">
                <text>The Master Plan of Policies for the City of Detroit was prepared by the Detroit Planning Department in 1990.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007759">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007760">
                <text>Detroit, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007761">
                <text>Wayne County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007762">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007764">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007765">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007766">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007767">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038290">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
