178 24 26018 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/f865f7b5ab4cfbe244d1bdd1b1a648bc.pdf aab07013c772b04d205727e425e1d552 PDF Text Text Date: October 1, 2001 To: Board ofTrustees From: Gil Hudson, Chair Membership Committee Re: Membership Recommendations The Membership Committee met on Friday, September 28, 2001 to review membership category definitions and criteria, membership retention and recruitment and dues. The following action items are presented for discussion and approval: RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the following changes in membership criteria as endorsed by the Membership Committee and recommended by the Community Foundation Committee where appropriate: • Modify the criteria for Community Foundations to reflect the current state law for community foundations eligible for the community foundation tax credit. • Redefine Community Foundation Affiliate to be limited to those participating in the Kellogg Youth Challenge and to further revoke their voting privileges as a CMF member. • Eliminate the category of Community Foundation Donor Advised Fund by grandfathering current members and closing the category to new members. • Eliminate the category of "Friends" of CMF. • Change the language in the Out-of-State Associates criteria from " must" to "should" have a grantmakiog presence in Michigan. • Amend the criteria for Public Foundations to include "have a permanent endowment" and "make substantial grants for broad charitable purposes." RESOLVED further that a policy be approved to terminate membership for nonresponsive members that ar·e more than two years delinquent on membership dues. RESOLVE D further that the Membership Development Plan/Campaign for 2002, including the goal of 578 by 200617 be approved. RESOLVED further that minimum dues be established at a level of $500 and that the dues categories be expanded with a dues increase to be considered by the Finance Committee as the budgets are prepared for 2002 and beyond. �Background There was consensus by the Committee that we can have "Friend ofCMF" without making it a distinct membershlp category. Attached is the Retention Plan to deal with the current 66 delinquent members. It is important to note that we may drop as many as 50 members by implementing the recommended policy in 2002. Also attached is the proposed Membership Development Plan for 2002. We look forward to your participation. The most desirable targets for membership are the 99 Independent and 2 15 Family foundations with assets of $1 million or more. It costs CMF $495 to service each member. A review of existing membership dues indicates that $500 is the common minimum. We presently have 107 members that pay dues at the level of$150 or $360. In making the recommendation to raise the minimum dues level to $500, we recognize that CMF may lose some of these members. ljfiscberBoarcJ9.28 ..() I membershiprecommendatioo.s �Retention Strategies Several membership retention strategies are recommended. By implementing these and other strategies being developed by the Phase ll Strategic Planning Task Forces, delinquencies can be significantly minimized and member satisfaction increased thereby reducing the number of voluntary non-renewals. Those suggested strategies are as follows. The status of each strategy (continue, expand, or add) is also indicated. • Track individual members' membership history (including records of key contacts on status of membership, dues, etc.), participation in programs, use of services, and purchases of reports and other products to support more personalized service. (expand) • Make personal contact with each member annually to ask about their satisfaction with CMF services and to solicit feedback about their needs. Every other year, make this contact through a visit to the foundation's offices. (expand) • Send new members a welcome letter, a membership packet describing CMF programs, products, and services available to members, invitations to serve on committees within eight weeks of membership initiation, and, per recommendations forthcoming from the Services Task Force, assign a "member buddy" or mentor to new members from among active, current members in the same membership category. (expand) • Feature new members in Memo to Members. (add) • Provide new members with a special orientation at the annual conference. (continue) • Contact new members at least twice during their first year of membership to highJight services. (add) • Feature renewing members in publications through stories on best practices, quotes, and special mentions on five-year membership anniversaries (I 0, 15, 20, etc.). (expand) • Contact non-renewing members to encourage them to renew, and, if unsuccessful, to determine reasons for termination. (continue) ** Additional strateg ies will be forthcoming from Strategic Planning task forces. �Membership Development Campaign: 2002 The proposed 2002 Membership Development Plan has three steps: 1) identification of potential members; 2) working with recruitment volunteers; and 3) staff reporting and recruitment. These are described more fully below. Identifying Potential Members CMF uses reports published by the IRS and the Foundation Center to identify potential new members. Both sources publish reports identifying newly established foundations and providing contact and asset information for each. The IRS report is published quarterly. The Foundation Center report is made available to CMF upon publication of its Michigan Foundation Directory, a biennial publication. In December of each year, CMF's Director of Membership and Special Projects conducts research and develops a target list of potential members for distribution to the Membership Committee and recruitment volunteers (Membership Committee and the Board). Specific steps in the campaign are as follows: • January-- IRS and the Foundation Center reports reviewed to identify CMF eligible foundations not currently members ofCMF. These include established and newly formed family and independent foundations. Staff do targeted mailing to eligible family foundations that includes a special invitation letter and a copy of The Family Philanthropist newsletter. • February-o A chart showing all eligible candidates for membership with foundation name, contact person, address, city, and asset information is presented to the Membership Committee for review and discussion; o Board members and general members are recruited as volunteers to help with development effort; o Volunteers select candidates they will contact from the chart discussed above; o Each volunteer is provided with the list of candidates s/he has offered to contact along with a summary of prior contacts, a brief description of each eligib le fou ndations' characteristics (type, asset size, year formed, etc.), a timeline for making contact, and key points to discuss with potential members; o Membership Committee members are encouraged to recruit 3 new members, Board members to recruit I to 2 new members, and volunteers from the general membership to recruit I new member. • March/ April --The Director ofMembership & Special Projects carefully monitors the recruitment effort, contacting each recruitment volunteer to check on progress, offer assistance, etc. Immediately following each successful invitation, the Director follows up with a phone call and letter to the new member. �• May - Recruit ment volunteer work completed. Recruitment records are updated for future recruitment (who contacted, how many times, how and what were results-- comments, for example, "not ready, please re-contact in six months.") For future campaigns, CMF will develop new marketing materials informed by recommendations forthcoming from the Marketing-Communications Task Force. The following is a sample of the format previously used to track recruitment by membership committee volunteers. This format allows for reporting on the progress of each volunteer, as well as each foundation. COUNCIL OF MICIDGAN FOUNDATIONS 2002 Membership Campaign Contact Activity Form CMFMember Membership Candidate Date of Last Contact Who Contacted and Method of Last ContactLetter, Phone, Visit Notes, Follow-up Plan and Deadline �MEMBERSHIP CRITERIA Memb. Cate~or) Category Definition Communi!) Foundauons Communi!\ Foundatiot; Affiltatc A commwtity foundation is a ta.x..:xempt public charity organized and operated as a permanent collection of endowed funds for the long-tcnn benefit of a dcfmed geographic area. A communi!) foundation affiliate, served by a lead community foundation, is organized and operated as a permanent endowment for the long-term benefit of a defined geographic area that has recerved funds through the CMF-W.K. Kellogg Foundation Youth Challenge. A communi!)• foundation donor advised fund is held by a community foundation where the donor, or a committee appointed by the donor, may recommend eligible charitable recipients for grants from the fund. The community foundation's aovemina body must be free to accept or re'ect the recommendations. A supporting organization is a charity that is not required to meet the public support test because it supports a community foundation. To be a supporting organization. a charity must meet one of three complex legal tests that assure, at a minimum, that the organization being supported has some influence over the actions of the supporting organization. Supporting organizations a.re distinguishable from donor advised funds because they arc distinct legru entities. A corporate (company-sponsored) foundation is a private foundation that derives its grantrnaking funds pnmanly from the contributions of a profit-making business. The company-sponsored foundation often maintains close ties with the donor company, but it is a separate, legal organization, sometimes with its own endowment, and is subject to the same rules and re~n~lations as other private foundations. A corporate giling (direct giving) program is a grantmaldng program established and admirtistered within a profit-making company. Gifts or grants go directly to charitable organizations from the corporation. Corporate giving programs do not have a separate endowment; their expense is planned as part of the company's annual budgeting process and usually is funded with pre-tax income. A consultant service business corporate giving (direct giving) program is a grantmaking program administered 11ithin profit-making companies, such as law firms, financial services and agencies. Gills or grants go directly to charitable orgamzations from the corporation. Corporate giving programs do not have a separate endowment. Reured grantmakers who have been associated with CMF. but are no longer affiliated witlt a CMF member. lndl1iduals whose giving is done in an organized, systematic manner and who can evidence a significant degree of commonality with other CMF members. A foundation whose headquarters is located in a state other than Michigan. Communi!) Foundation Donor Ad1·ised Fund Supporting Organizations Commumt) Foundation Corporate Foundations Corporate Gi1 rng Programs, Non-Consultant Corporate Gi1 ing Programs. Consultant Ser~ tce Business Fnends of CMF lndilidual Philanthroprsts Out-Of-State Associate Pnvate Foundations Family Pnvate Foundations Indcpenden t Private Foundations Operating A famrly foundation is one whose funds arc derived from members of a single family. Family members represent the majority of the board, and control tlte board. Trustees usually setve on a voluntary basis, recei1ing no compensation; in man) cases, second- and third-generation descendants of the original donors manage the foundation. Most family foundations concentrate their giving locally, in their communities. Independent foundations are usually founded by one individual, often by bequest. The members from the founding family, if any, represent a minority of the board and do not control the board. Many large independettt foundations are no longer governed by members of the original donor's family, but are run by boards made up of commumty. business and academic leaders. Independent foundations are oceasionally termed •non-operating' because they do not run their own programs. An operating foundation is a private foundation that uses the bulk of its income to provide charitable services or to run chantable programs of its own. It makes few, if any, grants to outside organizations. To qualify as an operating foundation, specific rules, in addition to the applicable rules for private foundations, must be followed. Major Ch anges Re•·oke Voting Privilege Eliminate Eliminate ·- �35 ,---- Mcmb. CateAor·~ Category Definition Public Foundauons Pubhe Foundauon Donor Advtscd Fund Supporttng Organwuions Pubhc Chant) Public foundations arc recognized as pubhc chanties by the IRS Al~tough they may provide direct charitable se" tees to tbe pubhc as other nonprofits do, their primary focus is on gmntmaking. A pubhc foundation donor advised fund is held by a public foundatJon where the donor. or a committee appomtcd b} the donor, may recommend eligible charitable recipients for grants from ~le fund. The public foundation's governing body must be free to accept or reject the recommendations. A supporting organization is a charity that is not required to meet the public support test because it suppons a pubhc chanty. To be a supporting organization. a charity must meet one of the three complex legal tests that assure. at a minimwn. that the organl7.ation being supported bas some influence over the actions of the supporting orgaruzation. Supporting organizations arc distinguishable from donor-ad\ ised funds because they arc dtstinct legal entities. Major Changes � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Membership-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50427 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/607f28618b15cc17906588177199bcb6.pdf 317f191855c44c02e77bc5cc74c63de1 PDF Text Text 33 Date: September 24. 2001 Memo To: Dave Campbell, Chairman and Board ofTrustees From: Gil Hudson, Chairman, Membership Committee Re: Work of the Membership Committee The Membership Committee is meeting on September 28 and has an ambitious agenda. The following list highlights issues being tackled by the Committee, and we hope to present many of these issues to you for discussio n and action on October 2. • • • • • • To redefine Community Foundation Affiliates and revoke voting privileges, To grandfather the current four members in the Community Foundation Donor Advised Funds category and eliminate the category, To adopt a Membership Development Plan for 2002, including delinquent members and those not contributing at the recommended dues level , To set a membership goal of578 by 2006 targeting Independent and Family Foundations with assets exceeding $1 million, To agree on core member benefits, and To discuss a dues increase for 2002, including an expansion of dues categories Background The chart that follows this memo summarizes all of the membership categories. The Community Foundation Committee has recommended the actions noted above concerning Affiliates and Donor Advised Funds. CMF has about 65 members that are more than two years delinquent in paying dues The Committee will be discussing strategies for renewing their membership by March 31 , 2002 with a recommendation to drop non-responsive members as members effective April I, 2002. At the same time, we look forward to involving all Trustees in the Membership Development Plan for 2002. Staff is recommending to the Committee that there are sufficient non-members above one million dollars in assets in the independent and family foundation groups to meet the five-year goal of 578 As CMF develops its first marketing brochure, it is necessary to define core membership benefits. Also following this memo is a list of member benefits the Committee is discussing. Finally, it has been six years since CMF increased member dues. Inflation has increased by at least 18% in that time, and coupled with other economic factors, this is an issue that needs to be discussed. �li1 EM8EI\SIIIP CRITERIA '<T M Memb. Category Catcgor} Ocfinition Communny Foundations Community foundation Affiliate Communrty foundation Donor Advised fund Supponmg Organizations Community foundation A communny foundation is a tax-exempt public charit} organized and operated as a permanent collection of endowed funds for the long-term benefit of a defined geogrophic area. A community foundation afliliate is organrzed and operated as a permanent endowment for the long-tenn benefit of a defi ned geographic area that may have its own 501 0 (3) status. A community foundation donor advised fund is held by a community foundation where the donor, or a commiuee appointed by the donor, may recommend eligible charitable recipients for grants from the fund The community foundation's governing body must be free to accept or reject the recommendations. A supponing organization is a charity that is not required to meet the public suppon test because it suppons a community foundation. To be a supponing organization, a charity muSI meet one of three complex legal tests that assure, at a minimum, that the organization being supponed has some inOuence over the actions of the supponing o rganization. Supponing organizations are distinguishable from donor advised funds because the) are distinct legal entities. (No Definition) Corporate foundations Corporate Grving Programs, Non-Consultant Corporate Giving Programs, Consultant Service Business Friends or CMf Individual Philanthropists Out-OtcState Associate Private foundations Family Private foundations Independent Private Foundations Operating Public foundations ~lojor Revoke Voting Privilege Ehmmote A corporate giving (direct giving) program IS a grantmaking program established and adminiSiered within a profit-making company. Gifts or grants go directly to charitable organizations from the corporation. Corporate giving programs do not have a separate endowment; their expense is planned as pan of the company's annual budgeting process and usually is funded with pre-tax income. A consultant service business corporate giving (direct grving) program is a grantmaking program administered within profit-making companies, such as law firms, financial services and agencies. Gifts or grants go directly to charitable organiz.Gtions from the corponuion. Corporate giving programs do not have a !tt:pardte endowment. Retired grantmakers who have been associated with CMf, but are no longer afliliated wrth a CMf member. Individuals whose giving is done in an organized, systematic manner and who can evidence a ;ignificant degree of commonality with other Cf members. A foundation whose headquaners is located m a state other th3ll Michigan. A family foundation is one whose funds are derived from members of a smgle family. Famrly members represent the majority of the board, and control the board. Trustees usually serve on a voluntary basis, receiving no compensation; in many cases, second- and third-generation descendants of the original donors manage the foundation. Most family foundations concentrate their giving locally, in their communities. Independent toundations are usually founded by one individual, often by bequest. The members from the founding family, ifany, represent a minority of the board Md do not control the board. Many large independent foundations are no longer governed by members of the original donor's fam il), but are run by boards made up of community, business and academic leaders. Independent foundat.ions are occasionally termed "non-operating" because they do not run their own programs. An operating foundation is a private foundation that uses the bulk of its income to provide charitable services or to run charitable programs of its own It makes few. if any, grants to outside organizauons To quahfy as an operating foundation, specific rules, rn addition to the applicable rules for private foundallons. must be followed. Public foundations are recognrzed as public charities by the IRS. Although they may provide direct charitable services to the public as other nonprofits do, their primary focus is on grantmaking. Changes I �Momb. Ca rc~:ory Public Foundation Donor Advised Fund Supponmg Organizations Public Charity Cu rc~or} Odinilio n A public foundation donor advised fund is held b) a public toundation where rhe donor, or a committee appointed by the donor, may recommend eligible charitable recipients for grants from the fund The public foundation's governing bod) must be free to accept or reJect the recommendations A supponing organization is a charity that is not required to meet the public suppon test because u suppons a public charity. To be a supponing organization, a c harity must meet one of the three complex legal tests that assurf, at a min unum, that the organization being supponed has some innuence over the actions of the supponing organization. Supponing organizations are distinguishable from donor-advised funds because the~ are distinct legal entities. 1\lnjor Changes �36 Benefits of Membership Benefits provided to members for dues include: • Resources & Information Services: the monthly Memo to Members newsletter, the CMF website with its Members Only section, the quarterly The Michigan Scene magazine, constituency based newsletters including Yakety Yak for youth grantmakers, the Family Philanthropist, and newsletters for Community Foundations and Corporate givers, listserves for targeted member audiences, research services, a lending library, book buying, newclippings, mailing labels, sample documents, and resources and connections via the CMF website. • Advocacy with State and Federal Officials: periodic interaction, testimony to Committees, assistance drafting legislation, special issue briefings and reports, and public-private partnerships. In some instances, CMF conducts its advocacy work in partnership with MNA or other organizations. • Convening/Facilitating: affinity group meetings for Michigan K -1 2 Education Funders group, Land Use Funders, etc; regional members meetings (spring regional members meeting, Detroit Area Grantmak.ers); special topic meetings (Philanthropy and the Media with Dot Ridings from COF), users groups (First Pearl software) and special meetings as requested by members (devolution). • Leadership with the Nonprofit Community via collaborations and serving as an intermediary: partnerships with MNA (Grantmaker/Grantseeker Biennial Conference), the Michigan Community Service Commission, Family Independence Agency (IDA Partnership), Michigan State Housing Development Authority (Homeless Prevention), Michigan AIDS Fund, the Tobacco Settlement (healthy youth and seniors), and the Great Lakes Collaborative (environmental protection). • Project Facilitation for member driven programs such as City Connect Detroit. • Technical Assistance: funder searches (for members and for grantees of members), accounting, administrative, and legal assistance, investment advisory, common grant forms, speech writing, meeting and retreat facilitation, assistance to members' consultants, board training. • Services/Group Benefits: Directors & Officers Liability insurance, group health (pending), the Detroit Office, and possibly others. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Membership-Committee-Work Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership committee work Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership committee work. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50428 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4ab0cc3d921f92fdb79105acd8fa5276.pdf 00b2a287774bd3af351d3b273ac6d23a PDF Text Text October 19, 2001 Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair and Board of Trustees From: Gilbert Hudson, Chair, Membership Committee Re: Membership Report I. Total of Approved Members as of 5/11/01 491 II. Applications for Membership received since 5/ll/01 +10 III. Approved Application and Termination at 5/11/01 Meeting Family Foundation Application: Clannad Foundation, Wilmington, NC Annie West Graham, Recording Secretary Corporate Giving Program Termination: Ernst & Young, Grand Rapids (not using CMF services/no longer has nonprofit clients) N. Applications since May 11, 2001 -- 10 Family Foundation: M. E. Davenport Foundation, Grand Rapids Kathleen M. Sneden, President The Glancy Foundation, St. Clair Shores Alfred R. Glancy III, Chairman Mackey Foundation, Grand Blanc Bruce Mackey, Secretary Sid Mittra & Bani Mittra Family Foundation, Rochester Hills Sid Mittra, President Werner & Ruth Nartel Foundation, Grand Blanc Evelyn Nartelski, Vice President Sage Foundation, Brighton John J. Ayaub, Secretary Amherst & Janeth Turner Foundation, Ann Arbor Janeth Turner, President Independent Foundation: Scofield Memorial Scholarship Foundation, Battle Creek Michael C. Jordan, Attorney Out-of-State Associate: �Membership Report October 19,2001 Page 2 Community Foundation of St. Joseph County, South Bend, IN Rose Meissner, President �Membership Report October 19,2001 Page 2 Applications since May 11, 2001 continued: Public Foundation: Grand Rapids Jaycees Foundation, Grand Rapids Martin J. Hillard, President V. - 6 Memberships Terminated After 5/11/01 Ave Maria Foundation (Unresponsive. Single purpose operating foundation.) Detroit Tigers (Tigers Care program) (no longer operating a grantmak in g program) The J. Paul Getty Trust (closed Michigan office) International Youth Foundation (no grantmaking in Michigan) SPX Foundation (company sold; moved out of state) Wigginton Educational Foundation (Single purpose; donor deceased & relationsh ip void) Total Membership as of 10/19/01 VI. Current membership composition is as follows: Private: Family Foundations Independent Foundations 56@ 11% 38@ 8% 5@ 1% Corporate: Foundations Giving Programs 32@ 7% 4 1@ 8% Public: Out-of-State Associate: Private Foundations Community Foundation Individual Philanthrop ist: VII. 287 58% 99 20% 73 15% 30 6% 4 1% 2 495 0% 100% 220@44% 67@ 14% Community: Foundations Affiliates Donor-Advised Funds Foundations Donor-Advised Funds 495 28@ 6% 2@ -0- 3@ 1% 1@ -02@ -0495 100% Total new members since 4/1/01 17 �Membership Report October 19,2001 Page 2 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Membership-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50429 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/91fbb31320c9a3cc8fa5526df7014775.pdf b3846588e7703016dc4cc75a1844da1d PDF Text Text October 22, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rob Collier, President, and Vicki Rosenberg, COO RE: Recommendations on Diversity & Inclusion, Positioning Statement and Strategic Plan Update DIVERSITY & INCLUSION Introduction At the October 2nd Special Board Meeting, Trustees engaged in a brief, but lively, discussion about diversity and inclusion, facilitated by Bob Tobin our strategic planning consultant. Although time did not permit a full exploration of these issues, there was consensus about the need to strengthen CMF's commitment to these values, both in principle and practice. To begin this process, the Board asked staff to: • • Expand the definition of "diversity" presented at the meeting; Prepare a draft value statement with implementation plan for discussion at the October 31, 2001 Board meeting; and The following expanded definitions are presented for your consideration. Diversity is men and women from different nations, ethnicities, races, and cultures, of different generations, religions, backgrounds, and sexual orientations, and with different skills, abilities, lifestyles, and beliefs. Inclusion: An environment where everyone has an opportunity to fully participate and is valued for the distinctive skills, experiences, and perspectives they bring to this environment. Action Item The following items are presented for discussion and approval: RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the following values statement: We Strive for Diversity & Inclusion-in our staff, our membership, our Board and our activities. Our goal is to understand the range of philanthropic perspectives held and traditions followed by our members and to share those with grantmakers through our programs and publications. By diversity, we �Diversity & Inclusion Memo to the Board of Trustees Page 2 mean men and women of all cultures, ethnicities, lifestyles, ages, beliefs, backgrounds, skills and abilities, races, and sexual orientations. We encourage members to join with us by developing their own commitment to diversity and inclusion for the future of philanthropy in Michigan. Based on the discussion of the above resolution, staff would move forward as follows: • • • Gather data through focus groups and interviews with selected members to identify areas of concern, desired outcomes, and suggested actions. Present the results of the data gathering effort to the expanded Long-Range Planning Committee for discussion and recommendation. Present the final action plan to the Board for review and action. POSITIONING STATEMENT At the October 2 Special Board Meeting, three possible positioning statements were presented: • Advancing Charitable Giving • Supporting (Creating/Advancing) A Culture of Giving • Advancing the State of Charitable Giving (Philanthropy) Wbtm lht: vult: was lakt:n, "Supporting a Cullurt: ufGiving" haJ lht: must vutt:s but nut from a majority of Trustees present. The discussion reminded us of our servant leadership role, and we returned to the Marketing/Communications Task Force for more discussion. The Committee has spent more time on this and considers "Serving Givers, Advancing Giving" as an alternative. There is some concern, however, that using the word givers is too similar to the United Way. It has been recommended that the word grantmakers replace givers for the statement to read " Serving Grantmakers, Advancing Giving." If the Board feels comfortable with this recommendation, a motion to adopt it as the Positioning statement is in order. If not we would recommend referring this matter back to the Marketing/Task Force for more discussion with Bob Tobin our consultant. STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE At the October 2"d meeting, the Board approved expanding the Long-Range Planning Committee (LRPC) to include its original members (Executive Cornn1ittee and Collier, Fischer, Katt, Lindberg, and Rosenberg) plus Task Force and Committee chairs (Neeta Delaney, Gil Hudson, Libby Maynard, and Elizabeth Sullivan), and staff (Judy Carl, Susan Howbert, Donnell Merseareau, and Gail Powers-Schaub). The goal of this expanded group will be to provide leadership on the integration of the Phase II recommendations into a comprehensive plan for CMF's future. The Committee's final recommendations will inform the work of the Marketing -Communications and Technology Task Forces. �Diversity & Inclusion Memo to the Board of Trustees Page 3 The next steps to complete the strategic plan are as follows: • • • • • November: Consolidation o f Phase II Recommendations into draft Strategic Plan December: Meeting of Expanded Long-Range Planning Committee to: review and make recommendations on final strategic plan including revised vision metrics (implementation benchmarks), implementation timeline, and instructions for Marketing-Communications & Technology Task Forces. Preparation of CMF FY02 Budget Meeting of Marketing-Communications Task Force. January: Presentation of FY02 Budget to Finance Committee. Market research with corporate members conducted. Meeting of Technology Task Force February: Meeting of Marketing-Communications Task Force Presentation of Budget and Final Plan to Board Meeting of Technology Task Force April I : Implementation of Strategic Plan begins. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Memo-to-Board Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book memo to board Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book memo to board. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50430 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/fa4b4e9ecc4fb58917ba9e21fd1eb1bf.pdf 9ccaa4cca8487a03880bbc01f54c919f PDF Text Text October 22, 200 I Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Leonard Smith, MAF Chair Glen Jack, MAF Executive Director Re: 2001 Annual Report Michigan AIDS Fund Michigan AIDS Fund A decade of compassion. A new era of hope. Mission To help reduce the spread and alleviate the suffering caused by HIV/AIDS by serving as an intermediary support organization between philanthropy and HlV/AIDS organizations and those affected by the epidemic in Michigan. Board of Trustees Leonard W. Smith, Chair Ira Strumwasser, Vice Chair Susan K. Broman, Treasurer Frederick W. Bryant, Secretary Robert S. Collier Carolee Dodge Francis Elan Garonzik Barbara J. Getz A. James Heynen Eric JirgensBarbara Jones Jay Kaplan Glenn F. Kossick Judith D. Rumelhatt Elizabeth C. Sullivan David K. Swenson Terri D. Wright Mary Fisher, honorary trustee Since it was formed by a group of grantmakers in 1989, the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF) has distributed more than $6 million from 100 plus grantmakers in funding and resources to block the spread ofHlV/AIDS in Michigan. It has supported programs with demonstrable success such as peer education, outreach to runaways, homeless and incarcerated youth, and testing and counseling for women. MAF exceeded its fundraising goal for the year and awarded grants totaling $614,297 to 21 organizations located throughout the state. Four examples of these grants are: $8,400 to Community AIDS Benefit Services in Kalamazoo $ 10,000 to the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community in Baraga $16,000 to Alternatives for Girls in Detroit $17,000 to Wellness Networks- Grand Traverse Area in Traverse City As a result of a Strategic Planning process, the Board of MAF determined that it was time for the organization to become fully independent with its own Executive Director, aft.er ten years of nurturing from the Greystone Group in Grand Rapids. After a search process, Glen Jack statted on January I as Executive Director, and he opened MAF's new office in Southfield in May. The Board bas appointed Jim Heynen, President of the Greystone Group, to a vacant seat. �The work of the Michigan AIDS Fund continues because: there are at least 1, 100 new .infections every year in our state; nearly 6,000 residents have died from AIDS, at least 13,000 neighbors and friends are living with the disease in Michigan. �Michigan AIDS Fund Board of Trustees Terms of Office The Bylaws allow for a Board of up to 17 members Class of 2001 - 2004 -(6) • Elizabeth Sullivan, Kresge Foundation • Rob Collier, Council of Michigan Foundations • Gerald Smith, Detroit Youth Foundation • David Swenson, Saginaw Community Foundation • Dr. Nora Maloy, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation • Larry Washington, Dow Chemical Company Class of 2003 - (5) • Susan Broman, Steelcase Foundation • Carolee Dodge Francis, Dickinson County Community Foundation • Barbara Jones, City of Detroit Health Department • Jay Kaplan, Michigan AIDS Alliance • Terri D. Wright, W. K. Kellogg Foundation Class of 2002 - (6) • Dr. Fred Bryant, Michigan State Medical Society • Elan Garonzik, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation • James Heyen, Charles Anthony Foundation • Eric Jirgens, The Gilmour Fund/Community Foundation of Southeastem Michigan • Judith Rummelhart, Harry A. & Margaret D. Towsley Foundation • Leonard W. Smith, The Flinn Family Foundation � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Michigan-AIDS Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book Michigan AIDS Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book Michigan AIDS. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50431 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7dd9db07afca4d418fd59e757037729c.pdf c97432fed72e8d4519df33673b72ab51 PDF Text Text October 24, 200 1 Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Maureen H. Smyth, Chair, Nominating Committee Re: New Trustees for the Class of 2003 and 2004 I am pleased to report that, based on ballots returned to CMF, the membership has elected the following trustees to the Class of 2004. • C. David Campbell, President, McGregor Fund, Detroit • • • • Allan D. Gilmour, President, The Gilmour Fund, Detroit Ann K. Irish, President & Trustee, The Elizabeth Kennedy fund, Harbor Springs William C. Richardson, President, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek Olivia P. Maynard of Goodrich, Trustee, Les Cheneaux Area Community Foundation, Cedarville S. Martin Taylor, President, DTE Energy Foundation, Detroit Betsy Upton Stover of Lansing, Associate Trustee, Frederick S. Upton Foundation, St. Joseph Sandra E. Ulsh, Vice President and Executive Director, Ford Motor Company Fund, Dearborn Patricia Reynolds, President, Capital Region Community Foundation, Lansing • • • • The election will be announced at the Annual Members Meeting on November 1 at 11:30 a.m. Congratulations to all! As you know, our October 31 Board Meeting w ill be the fmal meeting for Ralph Gerson and James Greene. The Nominating Committee presents the following two individuals as candidates for Board appointment to complete their two-year terms. • Robert Aronson, Assistant to the Chairman of Guardian Industries, Auburn Hills. Bob oversees the philanthropy of William Davidson, Chairman of Guardian and a past CMF Honorary Conference Chair. He also serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit. • Reverend J. Lewis Felton is Pastor of the Galilee Missionaty Baptist Church in Kalamazoo and has served as Trustee of the Kalamazoo Community Foundation since 1998. RESOLVED that Robert Aronson and J. Lewis Felton be each appointed to serve twoyear terms as members of the Board of Trustees Class of 2003. We look forward to welcoming these five new Trustees and to introducing them to our Members on November 1! � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Nominating-Committee-New-Trustees Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book nominating committee new trustees Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book nominating committee new trustees. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50432 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7a7541e722e0f8a7ea563f4bec622f1a.pdf 4916be639b169d54b063ac9e961a587c PDF Text Text 1 September 22, 200 I Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Maureen H. Smyth, Chair, CMF Nominating Committee Re: New Trustees for the Class of2003 and 2004 The Nominating Committee met in August and September via Conference Call to review the five vacancies occurring in the Board of Trustees. After much discussion we have presented three outstanding individuals to the membership for the Class of2004: • • • Betsy Upton Stover of Lansing, Associate Trustee, Frederick S Upton Foundation, St. Joseph Sandra E. Ulsh, Vice President and Executive Director, Ford Motor Company Fund, Dearborn Patricia Reynolds, President, Capital Region Community Foundation, Lansing These new nominees replace Lynn Feldhouse, who has retired from the DaimlerChrylser Corporation Fund, Neeta Delaney, who has announced that she is leaving the Jackson County Community Foundation in February, and Maureen Smyth, Vice President- Programs, Charles Stewart Mon Foundation, who has served the full three terms and is ineligible to continue as a trustee. We are delighted that the following six trustees have agreed to serve again: • C. David Campbell, President, McGregor Fund, Detroit • Allan D. Gibnuur, President, The Gilmour fund, Detroit • Ann K. Irish., President & Trustee, The Elizabeth Kennedy Fund, Harbor Springs • William C. Richardson, President, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek • Olivia P. Maynard of Goodrich, Trustee, Les C heneaux Area Community Foundation, Cedarville • S. Martin Taylor, President, DTE Energy Foundation, Detroit There are two vacancies in the C lass of2003. James Greene from Pharmacia in Kalamazoo has indicated that he is retiring effective October 31 ,2001 and Ralph Gerson from Guardian Industries has indicated that the pace of his travel makes it difficult to serve. Both men have submitted resignations effective October 31 , 200 I. We will recognize all five of these trustees at the Board Meeting on October 31 and the Annual Members Meeting on November I. To complete the two-year terms we are pleased to reco mmend two distinguished individuals: • Rober1 Aronson, Assistant to the Chairman of Guardian Industries, Auburn Hills. Bob oversees the philanthropy of William Davidson, CMFs Annua I Conference honoree the last time we were in Detroit, and he serves as Chief Executive Ofiicer oftl1e Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detro it. • J. Louis Felton, Trustee of the Kalamazoo Community Foundation s ince 1998. Reve rend Felton also serves as Pastor o f the Galilee Missionary Baptist Church. Assuming these recommendations meet with your approval, we would like to invite each of them to attend the October 3 1 Board Meeting and November I Annual Meeting as our guests. Their first official Board meeting is February 19, 2002. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Nominating-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book nominating committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book nominating committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50433 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4ed77e330e60c5f56de295289fc17d5d.pdf 15666b0ded436bff19b6f208e774ba77 PDF Text Text 39 September 24, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chairman and Board of Trustees From : Vicki Rosenberg RE: CMF Statement on Inclusion and Diversity At its February and May 2001 meetings, Trustees identified inclusion and diversity as issues of high importance to CMF. Presently, diversity is addressed in only one key CMF document, the 1997 Statement of Principles and Best Practices. (see below for the particular statement.) The May discussion focused on whether to include a statement on inclusion and diversity in the first point in the Values Statement that addresses relationships. The Board agreed that expanding that section to include language about inclusion and diversity would not be sufficient. It asked that further discussion be held on this issue toward identifying the best way to communicate and implement an organizational commitment to these principles. During the Octoher 2nd Roard meeting, Rob Tobin will facilita te a discussion on diversity and inclusion toward developing a policy statement and effective strategies for its implementation. To inform that d iscussion, the following are provided for review: • CMF Documents: (a) 1997 Statement from CMF's Principles & Best Practices Document; and (b) relevant section from CMF's new Values Statement. • COF & Donors Forum of Chicago policy statements on diversity and inclusion • Key Findings from "Building a Better Foundation: A toolkit for creating an inclusive grantmaking organization." Donors Forum of Chicago, Minnesota Council on Foundations, Northern California Grantmak,e rs, and New York Regional Association of Grantmakers, 2001. • Key Recommendations from "Diversity Practices in Foundations: Findings from a National Study". Joint Affinity Groups, 200 I . • Sample Diversity Statements from Select Associations and Corporations. �40 CMF DOCUMENTS Principles & Practices (1997) Draw on the full range of human talents available for board service, staff, and consultants. o o Some grantmakers have established a diversity policy to help them in considering how to obtain the best qualified individual for each task. Some grantmakers consider the demographics of their geographic area served when nominating board members and selecting staff. Values Statement (2001): Item One We build relationships to last: o With members first o With the philanthropic, non-profit, private, and public sectors, and general public second. o Through advocating and networking. o Our goal is to know every member well, to represent every individual engaged in organized, Michigan-based philanthropy, and to include a diverse group of members in our thinking and planning. o Our existing and future relationshlps with leaders in all sectors are buill to bring added value to our members individually and collectively. �41 COF & DONORS FORUM OF CIDCAGO Policy Statements on Diversity & Inclusion DONORS FORUM OF CIDCAGO (1996) Inclusiveness Policy The Donors Forum of Chicago, recognizing the diversity of Chicago's population and the value of having diverse perspectives and participation, is committed to providing equal opportunity to all people without regard for race, color, religion, gender, age, disability, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation or veteran status, in all aspects of its own organizational operations. The Donors Forum promotes inclusiveness in order to ensure that a range of perspectives, opinions and philosophy, are an integral part of the work carried out to fulfill the organization's mission. The Donors Forum shares the perspective that all people are pivotal to the improvement of the quality of life and need to be participants in the decision making process which involve issues that affect them. COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS lnclusivity Statement The Council on Foundations was formed to promote responsible and effective philanthropy. The mission requires a commitment to inclusiveness as a fundamental operating principle and calls for an active and ongoing process that affums human diversity in its many forms, encompassing but not Jjmited to ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, economic circumstance, disability and philosophy. We seek diversity in order to ensure that a range of perspectives, opinions and experiences are recognjzed and acted upon in achieving the Council's mission. The Council also asks members to make a similar commitment to inclusiveness in order to better enhance their abilities to contribute to the common good of our changing society. Management Support and Resources The Council provides technical assistance, information and resources to assist members in making their organizations better able to address the needs of the diverse society in which we live. �42 DISCUSSION QUESTIONS FROM " Building a Better F oundation: A toolkit for creating an inclusive grantmakiog organization." Donors Forum of Chicago, Minnesota Council on Foundations, Northern California Grant:makers, New York Regional Association of Grantmakers, 200 I 1. How do you determine your priorities? Whose input do you seek? 2. Do you involve members in assessing your organization's funding process, accessibility, and understanding of their needs? 3. Do you have a diverse network of advisors, however formal or informal? How frequently do you add new people to your network? 4. How have the demographics of your communities changed over the last five years and what are the future projections? What impact will those changes have on your priorities? 5. What barriers do your members face in reaching diverse populations? Can you help them sunnount these barriers? Are some of these barriers evident in your own operations? 6. Does your membership process have requirements that serve as barriers to newer, emerging groups and communities? 7. What's the commitment of your board of directors and top management to diversity? 8. Does your organization have clear strategies for increasing its diversity? 9. How could your organization benefit from diverse perspectives brought by diverse staff, consultants, or trustees? I 0. How could the values of your organization be better achieved through inclusive employment and board-selection practices? II. How well do you know the different facets of your membership and its leaders and how well do they know your mission and staff? 12. Does your policy on inclusion and diversity extend to your investments and vendor relationships? �43 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FROM "Diversity Practices in Foundations: Findings from a National Study" Joint Affinity Group, 2001 Include a commitment to diversity in key statements. Develop or refer to written materials that communicate diversity objectives. Committed organizations articulate the importance of diversity through their insitution' s mission, vision, values... Statements and organizational policies that reflect the centrality of diversity, formalize institutional commitment and establish a standard of accountability." Implement the Policy with these steps in mind: • Inform board and trustees about the value of diversity; • Undergo or provide traitllng to board, management, staff to increase understanding and improve communications at the outset of any diversity initiative. • Plan, dedicate needed resources, and evaluate progress as diversifying takes time, energy, and perseverance. • Gatht:r data through focus groups, surveys, and/or diversity audits to assess your organization' s diversity climate, and to identify areas of concern and desired outcomes. • Establish clearly defined internal goals, responsibilities and accountability mechanisms to design the initiative and identify professionals required. • Hire consultants, if expert and impartial help is needed. • Anticipate some failures, internal resistance, and departures and be willing to change systems and remove institutional barriers if necessary. �44 SAMPLE DIVERSITY STATEMENTS FROM ASSOCIATIONS & CORPORATIONS AMERICAN ZOO AND AQUARIUM ASSOCIATION Diversity Statement AZA recognizes and embraces the values of human diversity. We accept the moral and practical imperatives of our changing society, as well as the impacts of these changes on our personal and professional lives. We value and seek the strengths of human variety with respect to age, culture, gender, national origin, personal values and beliefs, physical abilities, race, religion and sexual orientation. In principle and in practice, AZA will commit time and resources to increasing diversity of our workforce. To serve our member institutions, AZA will assemble and provide resources on diversity programs, trends and issues. This statement applies to the Association's offices and its employees. It acknowledges that Association members may have their own statements or policies. It also acknowledges that a Diversity Special Committee has been established that will address diversity issues for the Association and its members �45 AUSTIN HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION Mission To provide programs and resources that promote diversity as a strategic component in the individual and organizational success of Austin Human Resource Management Association members (AHRMA). Objective To reflect the greater Austin community in membership demographics, program topics and issues, community involvement, and broader sponsorship. We plan to do this by: Increasing the diversity of AHRMA membership within currently underrepresented groups through active recruitment; Disseminating information about and promoting the use of Historically Underutilized Businesses among AI-IRMA members; Supporting community events which facilitate selection, development and retention of a diverse workforce; Sharing practical information from local business leaders who have a visible commitment to diversity in the workplace. Strategy Our strategy is to position diversity as a component critical to our individual and organizational success as human resource professionals by: a. Acknowledging diversity as part of everything we do as opposed to a "stand alone" or "something extra" that we'll do if we have time. This means that diversity must be reflected in the philosophy, policies and practices of AHRMA as well as communicated through local best practices. b. Providing members with tangible skills and competencies in managing and maximizing diversity. This means information communicated to members through newsletters, programs, conferences must have a high "practical application quotient." c. Connecting diversity to bottom line performance measures that all members can identify, understand and commit to �46 HEWLETT PACKARD Diversity: Is the existence of many unique individuals in the workplace, marketplace and community that includes men and women from different nations, cultures, ethnic groups, lifestyles, generations, backgrounds, skills, and abilities. We welcome many dimensions of diversity to HP. We want every HP employee to come to work in an environment that welcomes who he or she is, so that in tum, they can contribute their best to HP's success. Inclusion: Is the work environment we are creating where everyone has an opportunity to fully participate in achieving business success and is valued for the distinctive skills, experiences and perspectives they bring to the workplace. Work/life navigation: Tools and resources • • • • E-tools for doing work Dependent care referral Employee assistance program Education assistance program Flexible, supportive environment to manage work and personal life demands • • • • Flexible time off opt ions Flexible work arrangements Telecommunting Job-sharing � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Policy-on-Inclusion-and-Diversity Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book policy on inclusion and diversity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book policy on inclusion and diversity. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50434 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9c00a2f41bf27c361bce0329b48e6590.pdf d052382a75ac963bdba5450526919c47 PDF Text Text October 20, 2001 Memo to: Dave Campbell, Chair, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rob Collier Re: President's Report Because my last Report was sent to you on July 31, with the Audit Report, this Report features activities s ince August 1. Please let me know if you have any questions about any of these items . All of your staff at CMF greatly appreciate the extra time contributed by Trustees and more than 50 members to the Task Forces and Committee Meetings held as part of our Strategic Planning Process. As we all learned at the Special Board Meeting on October 2, much progress has been made and continues to be made on the Strategic Plan. Response to September 11 CMF sent out a special resource sheet to all members on September 14. In addition, we surveyed members and have created a September 11 response section on the cmif.org website. A copy of this section is included at the back of your Board book. In response to a call from State Education Superintendent Tom Watkins, Kathy Agard and her team at Learning to Give pulled together six lesson plans that have now been disseminated statewide by Tom's office. The lessons focus on giving in a time of crisis as well as recognizing the diversity of our state population. We continue to provide individual assistance to members in planning their individual responses to the tragedies of September 11. Conferences and Meetings August 22-23 Grantmaking Basics. Ypsilanti Thirty-eight staff from a diversity of members participated in this Grantmaking Basics seminar that took the place of what we used to call the Institute for New Trustees and Staff. We appreciated the efforts of a fine guest faculty, including John Marshall who Jed the discussion on Principles and Best Practices. September 13 - Michigan Municipal League, Battle Creek Three community foundation grantmakers joined me for a session with 75 city and village officials at the League's Annual Conference. We hope this session will strengthen partnerships between community foundations and municipal officials. September 13- Alliance of United Way Community Services Executives Retreat - Port Huron �President's Report October 200 I Jeri Fischer represented CMF on a panel to discuss state trends and their impact on philanthropy before this group of Agency Executives from southeast Michigan. �President's Report October 200 I September 19 -Michigan IDA Partnership State Conference More than 140 practitioners from the 30 program sites and three regional coordinating organizations were joined by a small group of funders for the first ever IDA Conference in Michigan. The Partnership has now funded 580 accounts through the program sites, and I am working with interested members to raise the needed $4 million private match. Executive Director, Eric Muschler was invited to participate in a national meeting held by the Annie E. Casey Foundation on Federal Funding for the Savings for Working Families Act. September 28-30 Family Foundation Retreat Our thanks to Julie Cummings and Susan Howbert for producing a remarkable Family Foundation Retreat. The 75 plus participants and their children remarked on the special family feeling that was conveyed by the faculty and the setting at Crystal Mountain. Publications In August you should have received the summer issue of The Michigan Scene as well as the CMF 2001 Annual Report. Three new publications (Copies in the back of your Trustee book) have been completed in September. Make A Difference Produced by our Mawby Sununer Intern, Kari Pardoe, this colorful, six page tri-fold responds to the many requests received for an orientation piece for new youth grantmakers. Each of the 86 community foundation youth advisory committees in Michigan has received 10 copies for use with their fall recruitment of new Y AC members. The publication will also be posted on the youth grantmakers website www.mcfyp.org for use by interested groups outside of Michigan. Youth Grantmakers Contribute to Community Foundation Growth This four-page brochure by Karin Tice, our community foundation evaluator, responds to the many requests received from conununity foundations nationally about the role that youth grantmakers have played in helping with the fund development of Michigan community foundations. Copies were recently distributed at the Council on Foundations Annual Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver. This brochure will also be on the www.mcfyp.org website. Standards For Community Foundations: Challenges and Lessons Learned This eight-page publication, also by Karin Tice with contributions by Dottie Reynolds, our range rider for three years, was a highlight of the Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver earlier this month. As community foundations nationwide begin the process of being in compliance with standards set forth by the Council on Foundations, they are eager to learn from our experiences in Michigan. As with the previous publication, production is possible thanks to special support from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. This document is located on the CMF website at www.cmif.org. �President's Report October 200 I Community Foundations as Environmental Stewards In addition, Mark Ducker, a filmmaker from Lansing completed production on the 11 minute video Community Foundations as Environmental Stewards. Produced with support from the Great Lakes Protection Fund, this video tells the story of the Community foundation for Muskegon County in becoming a successful environmental grantmaker. Copies of the video are being provided to every community foundation in the USA and Canada as well as placed on the CMF website and the Great Lakes Environmental Network website. It is hoped that the video will motivate community foundations to use their convening and grantmaking abilities to attract new donors interested in supporting environmental grantmaking. Also following this report is the article on Learning to Give featured in the August issue of Association Management. Partnerships & Dissemination Great Lakes Community Foundation Environmental Collaborative - Phase III Notice has been received from the Great Lakes Protection Fund of a two-year grant for $250,000 to work with 17 new shoreline community foundations in the Great Lakes Basin. Consultants for the Collaborative will continue to be Sheila Leahy from Buffalo and David Hahn Baker from Buffalo. August 15 - New York State I spoke at a special meeting in Albany, New York, convened by the lskol and Alexander family foundations with representatives of community foundations statewide, to explore the feasibility of a statewide youth grantmaking initiative. August 20-22- Arkansas We hosted a team from the Arkansas Community Foundation for three days to discuss how to implement a statewide youth initiative. Marv King, our Youth Project Consultant, organized the tour with the help of several community foundations and their YACs. September 11 - Strengthening Nonprofit Advocacy Project - Detroit CMF assisted MNA in organizing a group offunders to participate in a focus group as part of the National Advocacy Project being conducted by the Lincoln Filene Center at Tufts and OMB Watch. September 26 - Non Profit Day- Lansing CMF joined with the Michigan Nonprofit Association in sponsoring this annual Day of seminars and networking in Lansing for more than I 00 nonprofit organizations. October 3- Land Use Funders- Lansing With special grant support, CMF assisted the Land Use Funders in hosting 100 of their grantees from throughout Michigan to discuss strategies for joint public policy work on land use issues. Guest speaker, Patrick Noonan, President of the Conservation Fund, indicated that he knows of no other state where grantmakers are bringing their grantees together for such a dialogue. �President's Report October 200 I October 8 - 9 - Devolution Seminar - Lansing With special grant support from the Skillman Foundation, and the help of Pat Babcock from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, CMF worked with Public Sector Consultants in organizing a special seminar to discuss devolution, T ANF reauthorization and strategies for grantmaking. We will assist Skillman in distributing a report on the proceedings. October 9-12 - International Delegations from Brazil and Mexico After three months of planning by Julia Szanton, our International Coordinator, and with grant support from the C.S. Mott Foundation, two international delegations arrived for intensive site visits on community philanthropy. Four guests from Mexico used Ann Arbor as their base. Four guests from Brazil were based in Grand Rapids. On Saturday, October 13 both teams flew to the Council on Foundations Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver. Special thanks to the six community foundations that made these site visits a great success! October 15 City Connect, Detroit The first meeting of the permanent board of City Connect was held with Kari Schlachtenhaufen, first Board Chair, and Geneva Williams, Chief Operating Officer for the United Way Community Services of Southeastern MI, elected the first President. This marks the end of a two-year planning initiative staffed by Susan Howbert. October 13-19 Coalition of Community Foundations for Youth, Council on Foundations Annual Community Foundations Conference, WINGS-TCFN- Vancouver four primary activities to report on: • • • • Two youth grantmakers (Saba Gashugi from the Berrien Community Foundation and Josh Forhart from the Community Foundation of Delta County) joined me for the Annual Conference of Community Foundations for Youth and then presented in a session at the Conununity Foundations Conference. Donnell Mersereau presented our work on standards in a session at the Conference and attended the WINGS-TCFN Meeting of international support organizations to community philanthropy and chaired a five-day meeting of the governance working group of the Transatlantic Cornnmnity Foundation Network. More than 50 Michigan grantmakers participated in the annual Michigan evening with the extra bonus of 50 plus international guests thanks to the C.S. Mott Foundation. The Community Foundation Research and Development Incubator of Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures (staffed by the Williams Group) sponsored three focus groups and led a concurrent session on new research, products and communication tools. Special Activities CMF has been retained by the Jackson County Community Foundation to assist with the search process for a President to succeed Neeta Delaney in January 2002. Ads have been placed in regional newspapers as well as the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Resumes are being received until November 15. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Presidents-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book presidents report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book presidents report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50435 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/742d9988203504d8974bb3a231ca3df8.pdf 0322ef676432ac12998431127b9b78f1 PDF Text Text Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Board of Trustees Council of Michigan Foundations October 2, 2001 The meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) was held at the University Club ofMSU in Lansing, Michigan, on Tuesday, October 2, 2001 pursuant to written notice duly given. The m eeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by C. David Campbell, Chair. Trustees and officers present in addition to Mr. Campbell: Robert S. Collier Gerald K. Smith Julie F. Cummings Maureen H. Smyth Ira Strumwasser Neeta M. Delaney Elizabeth C . Sullivan Herbert D. Doan Richard K. Rappleye Richard T. Groos William C. Richardson Gilbert Hudson S. Martin Taylor Donald R. Parfet Margaret (Ranny) A. Riecker Amanda Van Dusen Kari Schlachtenhaufen Lloyd J. Yeo CMF Staff & Guests: Vicki J. Rosenberg, Vice President & Chief Operating Officer David R. Lindberg, Vice President Finance & Administration Judy M. Carl, Director, Marketing & Communications Jeri L. Fischer, Director, Membership Services Donnell Mersereau, Di rector, Community Foundations Gail Powers-Schaub, Director, Technology and Infom1ational Services Bob Tobin, Williams Group Karl Olmsted, Olmsted Associates I. Special Items of Business September 11 Chairman Campbell opened the meeting with a moment of silence in honor of those lost and those affected by the September 11 tragedies. Mr. Collier reviewed the electronic survey of members resulting in the posting of members' responses on the CMF website. A two-page summary of resources and ideas for helping was distributed to all members with the new Annual Report. At the request of State Superintendent of Education Tom Watkins, the Learning to Give Project developed six lessons plans, on both responding to tragedies and the diversity of our society, that he will be delivering to all public schools in Michigan. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 2 Family Foundation Retreat Vice Chair Julie Cummings reported on the successful Retreat held September 28-30 at the Crystal Mountain Resort for 75 trustees, staff and children from family foundations. Annual Conference Mr. Collier noted that Grants Manager Barb Dryer has taken on the added responsibility of Conference Coordinator in light of Sandy Katt's departure. He encouraged each Trustee to register and help promote the Conference with their colleagues. Emergency Homelessness Prevention Project Mr. Lindberg indicated the need for a formal Board resolution indicating our willingness to receive $22,000 from the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA) to help cover our administrative expenses on the $1 million Emergency Homelessness Prevention Project with community foundations. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the Council of Michigan Foundations accept $22,000 for administrative expenses from the Michigan State Housing Development Authority as part of the Emergency Homelessness Prevention Project. Nominating Committee Report Conm1ittee Chair Maureen Smyth presented the Nominating Committee Repott. She reported the ballot has been mailed to the CMF membership, which included the new nominees in addition to the current trustees up for re-nomination to represent the class of 2004. She also indicated that Bob Aronson and Rev. Lewis Felton would be presented for appointment by the Board on October 31, 2001 to complete the tenns of Ralph Gerson and James Greene. II. Strategic Plan Update Ms. Rosenberg reviewed the results of the Board's Strategic Planning Session on May 10 in Midland and noted that four Special Task Forces and two Committees involving 54 members and 15 trustees, have met since then to advance the Strategic Planning process. • Government Relations Committee Mr. Collier presented the two action recommendations of the Committee for Committee Co- Chair Libby Maynard. He noted that three more goals have been completed and moved to the accomplishments list. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the Legislative Goals Statement be approved with the following changes noted (a copy of which is attached to these minutes): �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 3 National Legislative Issues Revision of Goal 4: To repeal the excise tax on private foundations, replacing the previous goal of reducing the excise tax to a flat one percent. State Legislative Issues Addition of new Goal to support simplification of the Charitable Solicitation Act. Mr. Collier than reviewed the Committee's recommendation that the Board endorse the concept of supporting the creation of a bi-partisan philanthropy caucus by the leadership ofthe State Legislature. The goal is to have a core group of legislators familiar with philanthropy who can help educate new colleagues arriving in the Legislature. This concept is on response to term limits. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that CMF encourage formation of a Philanthropy Caucus by the leadership of the State Legislature as a bi-partisan group of up to 20 state legislators representing both the Senate and the House who can inform their colleagues about the work of foundations and corporate giving programs and encourage them to use CMF as a resource. • Education-Networking Task Force Task Force Chair Elizabeth Sullivan reported! on the work of her Task Force and the two recommendations on educational programming. She also reviewed the Decision Making Criteria endorsed by the Task Force to assist staff in reviewing member requests for education programming. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approves a Core Curriculum for 2002 that will cover five key competency areas (grantmaking, governance, finance, administration, and communications). Ms. Sullivan led the discussion about issue programming and the Task Force's recommendation that up to three topics be covered each year. She noted that the issues re listed are examples rather than an all-inclusive list. Upon motion duly made, supported! and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that CMF offer educational programming on up to three issue areas of high concern to members each year. • Technology Task Force Task Force Chair Dick Rappleye reported on the initial work of the three co-convenors of this Task Force and the recognition that their work would begin after the other Task Forces and Committees have completed their assignments. He noted that the CoConvenors are assisting staff in responding to three short terms needs related to the 2001 �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 4 Annual Conference. Gail Schaub offered a brief demonstration of the Zoomerang system being recommended and commented that the anticipated cost of the pilot in 2002 should not exceed $2,000. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that a " Rapid Response System" to obtain member feedback on time sensitive issues be piloted in 2002. Trustee Julie Cmmnings noted the importance of increasing the use of technology, specifically email, for staff/Board communication. • Services Task Force Services Task Force Chair C. David Campbell led the discussions of the three recommendations being presented for action, noting that their value in helping staff with time allocation was more important than revenue generation. The services will not be broadly marketed during the pilot because there is not sufficient staff capacity to respond. It was noted that the Membership Committee will be consulted on fees. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that a pilot program be approved to charge members fees for individualized technical services on board training, grantmaking guidelines and program d evelopment, strategic planning, exec.utive searches, and other services with guidelines for setting fees to be developed with input from the Finance Committee. Campbell also noted the role that CMF plays in helping to create foundations and that it cannot be taken for granted that a new foundation will become a member. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the provision of the following services to eligible nonmembers be offered as an enticement to membership: a) complimentary consultation on foundation establishment, limited to providing a "how to" guide and verbal orientation. b) If requested, foundation establishment services for a fee with a membership dues rebate possible upon joining CMF. Finally, Campbell noted the Task Force's discussion of individual services being provided to grantseekers and members strong feeling that such requests should not include individual searches but be limited to copies of the complimentary "Survey and biformationfor Seeking" publication and a referral to one of the Foundation Center Cooperating Collections. RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the elimination of any individualized service to grantseekers beyond the current "Survey and Information for Seeking" now used. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 5 • Marketing/Communications Task Force Task Force Chair Neeta Delaney explained the initial work of the Task Force in reviewing all of the many publications produced by CMF and the recommendation that the current logo and positioning statement be updated, given the growing competitive marketplace for philanthropic membership associations. She introduced Karl Olmsted of Olmsted Associates in Flint whose fim1 has done award winning work for the C.S. Mott Foundation, and has been retained to assist with these tasks. Olmsted presented three options for a revised logo and three options for a new positioning statement. He also introduced four color palettes - the existing light b lue, a royal blue, a blue green and a light green. During lunch, the Trustees had the opportunity to vote on their first choices. Ms. Delaney noted that there was consensus on the logo and color palette. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that an updated logo and color (as attached to these minutes) be adopted for use beginning at the 29th Annual Conference. Ms. Delaney then led a discussion with Mr. Tobin's help about the role of the positioning statement. There was consensus by the Board that such a statement had to recognize the organization's role as a support to both foundations and corporations. A vote was held on the three statements w ith the most votes, but not a majority of those present, for "Supporting a Culture of Giving'' Mr. Campbell indicated that the feelings of the Board would be shared with the Task Force with the hope of still having a new positioning statement to share at the Annual Members Meeting on November 1, 2001. • Membership C ommittee Conm1ittee Chair Gil Hudson shared the results of the Membership Committee Meeting, and the four proposed resolutions for consideration. He noted that the Committee was still working on a number of issues, including those members that do not pay the recommended dues amount. He reviewed each of the membership categories before introducing a resolution to amend four categories and eliminate two as noted below. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the following changes in membership criteria as endorsed by the Membership Committee and recommended by the Community Foundation Committee where appropriate: • Modify the criteria for Community Foundations to reflect the current state law for community foundations eligible for the community foundation tax credit. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 6 • Redefine Community Foundation Affiliate to be limited to those participating in the Kellogg Youth Challenge and to further revoke their voting privileges as a CMF member. • Eliminate the category of Community Foundation Donor Advised Fund by grandfathering current members and closing the category to new members. • Eliminate the category of "Friends" of CMF. • Change the language in the Out-of-State Associates criteria from "must" to "should" have a grantmaking presence in Michigan. • Amend the criteria for Public Foundations to include "have a permanent endowment" and "make substantial grants for broad charitable purposes." Mr. Hudson reviewed the status of 66 members that are now more than two years delinquent in paying dues, noting that despite best efforts to have their memberships renewed by the end of the fiscal year on April! , 2002, up to 50 members could be lost. He indicated the Committee's recommendation to terminate the membership of those two years behind as of April 1, 2002 and that the Board adopt such a tennination policy. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED further that a policy be approved to terminate membership for non-responsive members that are more than two years delinquent on membership dues. Mr. Hudson summarized the Committee's Membership Retention Plan and Development Plan for 2002 (attached to these minutes) with a five-year goal of 578 by 200617. He explained that the goal had been well crafted with staff and reflects projected membership gains and losses including the anticipated loss of 50 non-dues paying members. Trustees can look forward to being asked at the February 2002 Meeting to assist with membership recruitment in 2002. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED further that the Membership Development Plan/Campaign for 2002, including the goal of 578 by 2006/7 be approved. Mr. Collier then introduced a three-part resolution from the Membership Committee. He noted that there was consensus by the Committee that our two lowest dues categories of $ 150 and $360 paid by 107 members are too low, and that the minimum dues should be raised to $500. In addition, there was consensus that the dues categories should be examined with the idea of reducing the ranges in the categories to better capture the growth in assets that will occur over time by members. Finally, there was agreement by �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 7 the Committee that the Finance Committee should examine a dues increase as projected budgets are developed for 2002 and beyond. After discussion on these three points, the Board decided to defer action for further analysis by the Finance Committee. Policy on Inclusion Mr. Tobin and Ms. Rosenberg facilitated a brief discussion on a statement on inclusion for CMF to adopt as part of the Strategic Planning Process. In reviewing six sample components, there was consensus that a policy statement needed to be action oriented and that inclusion needs to be better reflected in CMF's values statement. The item was referred for further discussion at the next Board Meeting. Next Steps Mr. Campbell indicated that because there was not sufficient time, we would defer discussion of the October 2000 Guiding Questions and the vision metrics to the next meeting. He noted the inclusion of the fall calendar for Next Steps in the Board book and that he plans on asking Task Force and Committee Chairs in 2002 to join with the members of the Executive Conunittee in expanding the Strategic Planning Committee into an ongoing Long Range Planning Committee. The next scheduled meeting of the Board of Trustees will be held October 31, 2001, at the Marriott Renaissance Hotel in Detroit from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. There being no further business to come before the board, Chair, C. David Campbell adjourned the meeting at 3:00p.m. C. David Campbell, Chair 1:\Scuddington\ Board of Trustees\M inutes200 liM inutes0ct2nd.doc Robert S. Collier, President � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Previous-Board-Minutes Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book previous board minutes Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book previous board minutes. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50436 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/93c806f29bfbcaf100f720d0dd44ba09.pdf 869b4d044dafb6e5b842e05ef0ff30c7 PDF Text Text 47 September 24,2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chairman and Board ofTrustees F rom: Vicki Rosenberg, COO Re: Measuring Our Progress: Now and in the Future CMF's Strategic Planning process has been guided by questions developed by the Board at its October 2000 meeting. Measuring our progress against answering these questions is an important step in completing Phase n of our process. Once CMF begins implementing the 2002-2006 Strategic Plan, it wiU important to measure progress in meeting the goals set out in that Plan. The Vision Metrics that constitute an important component of the Plan have been in draft form since winter 2000/01. Therefore, during the October 2, meeting, Bob Tobin will guide t he Board through a discussion about: • • Our progress in successfully addressing the Board's October 2000 Guiding Questions; and T he draft Vision Metrics and changes needed to more closely tie those to t he evolving Stra tegic Pla n. To inform our discussion, the following background materials are provided: • The Board's Guiding Questions • The current draft Vision Metrics • Board and Member Desires & Aspirations for CMF • Opportunities identified through the SWOT Analysis G uiding Questions: October 2000 I. How can we best serve the evolving needs of an increasingly diverse, special ized membership? 2. Are we a state, regional, national, or international organization? 3. What is our desired relationship with state government? 4. How do we define and manage our evolving role as an intermediary? 5. How do we resolve tensions between our dual roles of membership service and philanthropic leader? 6. What is our hierarchy of roles and initiatives relative to our mission? 7. What metrics are most important to us as we look into the future? �48 Vision Metrics: Winter 2000-01 o o o o o Philanthropic Resources: annual philanthropic giving by CMF members Leverage Factor: total $ flowing through CMF per member dollar New Foundations: created between 2001 and 2006 Market Share: %of eligible members who belong to CMF Member Satisfaction: % of members reporting "excellent" value Board & Member Desires for CMF to: Boa rd • Grow as a successful conduit/vehicle for philanthropy • Increase its capacity to be flexible and responsive to member needs • Increase emphasis on education/capacity building [infonnation development, training, technical support] • Include more diverse representation • fncrease philanthropic resources of state with emphasis on financial support and knowledge transfer • Advance cooperation of all resources to advance public good (connect silos) • Develop sustainable, long-tenn funding [new revenue streams other than dues] • Be the premier RAG • Advocate for/build legislative environment conducive to our "best" work • Strengthen promotion to build positive awareness • Help 30-and 40-someUlings become engaged/active in philanthropy • Help advance intergenerational transfer of philanthropic interest in fam ily foundations • Brand "philanthropy" and/or "foundation" in ways that connect with public • Develop clear membership criteria - including issue of single purpose organizations • Build strongest possible relationships with professional advisors to wealthy Members (via Focus Groups & S urvey) • Design ways to involve members in decision making about intermediary opportunities • Increase philanthropy in a way that balances the c reation of new family foundations with the c reation of new funds in community foundatio ns • Be alert to tbe impact membership g rowth may have on tbe quality of the membership cxpencnce • Increase the number and type of networking opportunities (a highly valued service) including by issue, within regions, and for member-to-member exchange • Strengthen conununications including: promotion ofCMF. web and print based products, member to staff communication, and clarification of purpose statements • Make members our highest priority by: building value to members into every activity, knowing every member and meeting their needs, and providing equitable service across member type, asset level, and location (of most concern to corporate givers and famil y foundations) �49 • Promote principles and best practices through education, technical assistance, and sharing of best practices from in and outside of Michigan with members and others "Key Trends Analysis" (January 200J) Member Expectations of High Performing Associations • High quality, customized programs and services based on generational preferences • Help brokcring partnerships and collaborations • Proactive servant leadership On-demand access to information and services • Effective advocacy with state government • Leadership for best practices and standards Organizational Cha racteristics: • Shared decision making • Customer focused • G lobal Mindset • Entrepreneurial, nimble SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) Opporttmities What We Don't Have but Want • More Market Share (members, service utilization) • More members/more d iverse members (next generation, people of color) • New categories of members • Partnering with competitors • Higher revenue generation via dues, fees for service. packaged product sales • Equitable services for all member types and asset levels • Effective marketing (including capacity, programs, resources) • Expanded role as connector of constituents • Regular self-assessment and planning (e.g., every three years) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Progress-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book progress report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book progress report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50437 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d6bdf49adb18ef4919792353f7d50a10.pdf 3da672897a2471340c26691fc0a836a0 PDF Text Text 2 September 24, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chairman and Board ofTrustees From: Vicki Rosenberg, COO RE: Update on CMF Strategic Planning Process: May 2001 Board Meetings & Phase IT Work- May through September, 2001 May 10, 2001 Board Meeting On May I0, 2001 , the Board of Trustees participated in a strategic planning work session. At the meeting, staff reported on findings from the data-gathering process, and presented a draft Vision Statement and draft Values Statement for comment and revision. The approved Statements are provided below. • Vision Statement "To be the premier philanthropic association." • V nlues S tatement We build relarlonships to last. We act as a Servant-Leader for organized philanthropy. We have, seek, and share knowledge. We strive for excellence in everything we do. During the discussion of values, tbe issue of diversity was raised. The Board expressed its commitment to djversity and inclusion and agreed that that commitment required more than additional language in the first part of the four part Value Statement. Please see Tab 8 for a fuller discussion of thjs issue. Finally, Board and staff worked in small groups to review CMF's purpose statements, and to develop one goal, strategy, and tactic for each. The results of that work follow. �3 Update on Strategic Plan September 24,2001 Page2 Revised Purposes, Goals, Strategies & Tactics Advocate: To represent Michigan philanthropic interests and concerns with state and national government. 2- Yr Goal: For CMF Members and leaders to have effective relationships with state and federal officials Key Strategy: Develop a network of CMF members who have annual contact with key state leaders of both parties in executive and legislative branches, and all federal Michigan delegates. Tactic: Hold annual state legislative day. E ducate: To help grantmakers be highly effective by providing educational resources and services. 5-Yr Goal: To have 75% of members participate in high-quality CMF education programs built on global best practices Key Strategy: Develop education programs based on member needs. Tactic: Develop programs in coUaboration with national affinity groups. Increase: To grow philanthropy in Michigan. 5-Yr Goal: To engage 350 new philanthropists in Michigan. Key strategy: Build strong alliances with financial advisors. Create an advisors' network. Tactic: Lead: To facilitate and support philanthropic responses to critical needs in the state. 5-Yr Goal: To have 35% of CMF members participate in the evaluation of opportunities for coordinated response. Key Strategy: Create a system for member involvement in decision making about opportunities for coordinated action. Action Idea: To create and test a rapid response method over the next two years. �4 Update on Strategic Plan September 24, 2001 Page 3 Network: To provide the means for regular sharing of ideas and experiences among grantmakers and with grantseekers. 5-Yr Goal: To have 75% of members participate in networking opportunities Key Strategy: Offer expanded networking opportunities (regional, topical, statewide, national). Hold a series of regional networking events. P romote: To help M ichigan citizens understand and appreciate the role of philanthropy. 5-Yr Goal: To help members partner with grantees to be effective communicators of philanthropy's on quality of life, and develop working relationships with the state's media. Key Strategy: Engage members, grantees, and the media in promoting philanthropy. Tactic: Conduct workshops, editorial roundtables, and media advisories. Membership To conduct alJ activities necessary to operate the premier philanthropic association. & Operations: 5-Yr Goal: To have capacity and resources that match our needs, purposes, and vision (including revenue, marketing, technology) Key Strategy: Increase internal capacity including: revenues, marketing, technology. �5 Update on Slnltegic Plan September24, 2001 Page4 May 11, 2001 Board Meeting At the May 11,2001 Board meeting, staff provided Trustees with a summary of the results of the May 10, 2001 Board session. In addition, a plan for Phase II of the Strategic Planning process was presented and approved. That plan called for the creation of special task forces and expanded Committees to be led by Board members, comprised of a representative mix of members, and supported by staff. Their charge would be to develop promising strategies and tactics in six key areas through a highly inclusive, participatory process. By late June, the Task Forces and Committees were fooned. They are generously served by 54 members, 15 Trustees, and Bob Tobin who is a member of the MarketingCommunications Task Force. In addition, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the Kresge Foundation and the Charles Stewart Mott Fooodation generously agreed to serve as coconveners of the Technology Task Force. For your information we have included the Task Force and Committee Rosters and a calendar of Task Force and Committee meetings. In May and June, CMF staff consolidated all aspects of the Strategic Plan to define and articulate the purpose, scope of work, goals, and timelines for each Task Force and Committee. An orientation document was provided to Chairs who were convened via conference call to develop a common vision for moving forward with Phase II. 'In addition, staff examined the six areas to be covered by the Task Forces and Committees as step one in the process of preparing Briefing Papers that have been provided to each group to inform and guide their work. Finally, CMF management met with the Technology Task Force co-conveners to review organizational goals and priorities. In July, August and September, Task Forces and Committees met in person and via conference call to begin developing recommendations. Most groups have met twice. The Technology Task Force had its first orientation conference call in September. The Membership Committee will have its first all-day meeting on September 28lh. An overview of the six Task Forces and Committees. their chairs and goals follows. �6 Update on Strategic Plan September 24, 200 I Page~ MARKETING & COMMlJNJCATIONS, Chair, Neeta Delaney Purpose to Address: Membership & Operations Goal: To Make Recommendations Regarding: Communications: • Target audiences: members, non-members, grantseekers, public, other • Graphic identity including logo • Website (content, look, other) • Regular publications (type, content, frequency) • Special publications • Other Marketing: • • • • Target Audiences: members, potential members, etc. Marketing Messages Marketing Strategies Appropriate percentage of budget to be allocated to marketing EDUCATION & NETWORKING TASK FORCE, Chair, Elizabeth Sullivan Purposes to Address: Education, Network, Increase · Goal: To Make Recommendations Regarding: • Education/networking programs to keep, eliminate, revise • New education/networking programs to develop & offer • Schedule of offerings for programs to be repeated (annual, bi-annual, etc.) • Evaluation methods for education/networking programs • Process for periodic review/revision to offerings • Related ideas for Technology and Marketing/Communications Task Forces MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE, Chair, Gil Hudson Purposes to Address: Membership & Operations Goals to Accomplish: Recommendations Regarding: • Member benefits to be provided automatically with dues • Membership categories and descriptions for new ones • Membership retention strategies • Annual membership growth goals and related campaign strategy • Dues structure • Related ideas to Technology and Marketing/Communications Task Forces �7 Update on Strategic Plan September 24, 2001 Page6 SERVICES TASK FORCE, Chair, Dave CampbeU Purpose to Address: Membership & Operations Goals to Accomplish: Recommendations Regardjng: • Policy for providing services to non-members and grantseekers • Current or new services to be offered on a fee basis • Fee structure for services to members, non-members, grantseekers • Related ideas for Technology and Marketing/Communications task forces TECHNOLOGY TASK FORCE, Chair, Dick Rappleyc Purposes to Address: Membership & Operations Goals to Accomplish: Recommendations Regarding: • Long-term technology plan for CMF • Process for on-going review/revision of CMF technology platform • Use of technology for specific programs, products, services, (drawing on recommendation from other task forces) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Strategic-Planning-Update Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book strategic planning update Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book strategic planning update. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50438 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ba7417f6b91e4fe15ba4c6cca0be7993.pdf 9a49fe5b4d39bbd59db2b6fd1abbeac2 PDF Text Text so September 24, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell. Cbainnan and Board ofTrustees From: Vicki Rosenberg RE: Strategic Planning: Next Steps Following the October 2"d Board meeting, CMF staff. working with Phase II Task Forces and Committees, will complete the strategies and tactics needed to complete the 20022006 Strategic Plan. Following are: (I) a summary of key dates during the remainder of 2001; (2) a discussion of the role and composition of the Long-Range Planning Committee during the final phase of planning; and (3) a summary of goals for each of the Task Forces and Committees. Key Dates • • • October: o Revisions to plan based on actions taken at October 2nd Board meeting o Meetings of the Marketing-Communications, Services. and EducationNetworking Task Forces to proceed toward achieving all goals o Strategic Plan Update to Board of Trustees at October 31 meeting November: o Presentation of strategic plan update and components to members at the Annual Conference including logo and positioning statement, website homepage, Rapid Response System, and on-line education program plan with demonstration in Resource Central. o Meetings of the Marketing-Communications and Technology Task Forces o Meeting ofU1e Long-Range Planning Committee (tentative) o First stage work on CMF 2002 budget December: o Meetings of the Marketing-Communications and Technology Task Forces o Development of CMF 2002 budget Long Range Plannin g Committee Involving a broad spectrum ofCMF members and Trustees in the development of guidelines. policies, strategies, and tactics for the 2002-2006 Strategic Plan has proven to be a very successful strategy. Trustees who chair the Task Forces and Comm ittees have provided invaluable guidance and direction to CMF staff. Members and Trustees serving �51 as members of these groups have provided hig hly informed input on ways in which CMF can increase its value to members and achieve its mission and newly articulated vision. To complete this process, CMF wishes to maximize the added value of Trustee leadership by expanding the current Long-Range Planning Committee to include Trustees serving as chairs of Phase 1I Task Forces and Committees and select CMF staff who have served as lead staff for these groups. The expanded Committee would meet in late fall to look at all of the recommendations that will be forthcoming from the Task Forces on Education/Networking, MarketingCommunications, and Services and from Committees on Government Relations and Membership. Its goal will be to provide leadership on the integration of these recommendations into a comprehensive plan for CMF's future. The Committee's fmal recommendations wilJ inform the Technology Task Force. Phase ll Task Forces & Committees Following the October 2, 200 I Board meeting, CMF staff. guided b) Phase II Task Forces and Committees, will complete their recommendations as articulated in the Strategic Planning Update found under Tab One. �Values Statements We Build Relationships to Last - with our members first- and with the philanthropic, non-profit, private, and public sectors, and the general public second - through advocating and networking. Our goal is to know every member well, to represent every individual engaged in organized, Michigan-based philanthropy, and to include a diverse group of members in our thinking and planning. Our existing and future relationships with leaders in all sectors are built to bring added value to our members individually and collective!y. We Act as A Servant-Leader for organized philanthropy - by promoting and increasing philanthropy in Michigan. We serve by understanding and meeting members' individual needs. We lead by anticipating and then meeting members' collective needs. In this role, we espouse the highest ethical standards. Our success is measured by the health and vitality of organized philanthropy in Michigan and by the level of civil society in our state- now and in the future. We Have, Share, and Seek Knowledge - with members and in support of membersthrough education and networking. Our knowledge is personjfied by staffwith deep expertise in philanthropic principles and best practices worldwide - from the technical to the topical to the philosophical, and with skills in research and communications; by members who continually redefine best practices and represent expertise in a vast array of subjects and on a wide range of issues; and by partners and collaborators who enrich our understanding oft he needs for and impact of organized philanthropy. We Strive for Excellence io Everything We Do - through a strong infrastructure-- clear goals, strong leadership, expert staff and effective management systems - that enable us to be nimble, entrepreneurial, and good stewards of our resources. These qualities allow us to provide our members with the best, most comprehensive services available to organized philanthropy anywhere. We believe to achieve excellence requires CMF as a who le-- each staff member and the Board of Trustees -- to reflect, innovate, communicate, grow, and improve. Our goal is to have all members recognize CMF as the most valuable association to which they belong. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Strategic-Planning Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book strategic planning Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book strategic planning. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50439 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d21881b093160d2388640fc81b0acab4.pdf acdaa8b19994695fb0b66a7bfd73ec47 PDF Text Text October 20, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Maureen H. Smyth, Chair CMF Supporting Organization Committee Re: Minutes of the Supporting Organization Committee The Supporting Organization Committee conducted its annual meeting with representatives of the two supporting organizations to the Council of Michigan Foundations- the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF) and Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures (MCFV)- on October 18, via conference call at 4:30p.m. Committee members in attendance included; C. David Campbell, Gil Hudson, Elizabeth Sullivan, Rob Collier and Mariam Noland, who also represented Jack Hopkins, Chair ofMCFV. Leonard Smith, Chair ofMAF also participated. Michigan AIDS Fund Mr. Smith noted that the Board ofMAF is losing three trustees this year who have completed nine years of service - three successive terms of three years each - Ira Strwnwasser from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation, Barb Getz from the Gerber Fow1dation, and Glenn Kossick from the Metro Health FoWldation. He indicated that Gerald Smith has agreed to serve as the new CMF Trustee replacing Ira Strumwasser. Elizabeth Sullivan and Rob Collier will continue to serve as the other two of three required CMF Trustees on the MAF Board. He noted that two new individuals are being recommended as Trustees for consideration by the Supporting Organization Committee: Dr. Nora Malloy, Senior Program Officer of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation, and Larry Washington, Vice President with Dow Chemical. Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the following individuals be presented to the Board of Trustees of CMF for appointment to the Board of the Michigan AIDS Fund for a three-year term as the Class of 2004. • Elizabeth SuUivan, Kresge Foundation • Rob CoUier, Council of Michigan Foundations • Gerald Smith, Detroit Youth Foundation • David Swenson, Saginaw Community Foundation • Dr. Nora Maloy, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation • Larry Washington, Dow Chemical Company Mr. Collier and Ms. Sullivan abstained from the vote. Mr. Smith noted that Glenn Jack, Executive Director ofMAF, would join him, for the annual report to the CMF Board on October 31. �CMF Supporting Organization Minutes October 18, 200 I Page 2 Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures Mariam Noland, Vice Chair ofMCFV, noted that Jack Hopkins, Chair ofMCFV, was returning from the Annual Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver, which was why he was unable to be on the call. She indicated that the Class of 2004, includes herself, and that each of the recommended trustees currently serves and is eligible to be appointed for another three year tem1. The three CMF Tmstees required to be on the MCFV Board are D iana Sieger, President oft:he Grand Rapids Community Foundation, Olivia Maynard, Tmstee of the Les Cheneaux Community Foundation, and Neeta Delaney, President of the Jackson County Community Foundation. Patty Reynolds, President of the Capital Region Community Foundation, serves on the MCFV Board and is being elected to the CMF Board as a replacement for Neeta Delaney. Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the following individuals be presented to the Board of Trustees of CMF for appointment to the Board of Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures for a three year term as the Class of 2004. • Brenda Hunt, President, Battle Creek Community Foundation • Mariam Noland, President, Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan • Victor Papale, President, Community Foundation of Greater Flint • Jeanne Snow, President, Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation • David Woodworth, President, Upper Peninsula Community Foundation Alliance. Ms. Noland abstained from the vote. She noted that Mr. Hopkins planned on being at the October 31 CMF Board Meeting to make the annual report on MCFV. Mr. Collier added that MCFV had sponsored a booth in the exhjbit area at the Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver with the products from Phase II of the Venture Products Fund. He indicated that there is great interest in the identity system, ads, and other products. Ms. Noland added that MCFV is fulfilling its mission of supporting collaborations by community foundations that will contribute to both their continued growth and economies in operations. There being no further business the call was adjourned at 4:50 p.m. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Supporting-Organization-Committee Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book supporting organization committee Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book supporting organization committee. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50440 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ab285eb1e9769a29721ef6f6328603e6.pdf 35ef678d286ef26fcf5a54e8cd3305c8 PDF Text Text 8 Education/Network Task Force Ms. Susan L. Kelly I arget Corporation Ms. Elizabeth C. Sullivan 111e Kresge Foundation Ms. Jennifer Poteat Flores I larry A. & Margaret D. 1 owsley Foundation Ms. Carol Goss The Skillman Foundation Ms. Susan Howbert Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Jodee Fishman Raines The Jewish Fund Olivia P. Maynard Les Cheneaux Area Community Foundation Thomas B. Cook Cook Family Foundation Ms. Carolyn A. Bloodworth Consumers Energy Foundation Ms. Donnell nile Mersereau Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Vicki J. Rosenberg Council Of Michigan Foundations RobertS. Collier Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Carol Paine-McGovern Paine Family Foundation M s. Ellen Satterlee The Wege Foundation �9 Government Relations Task Force Mr. C. Patrick Babcock W.K. Kellogg Foundation RobertS. Collier Council of Michigan Foundations John M. Frey Frey Foundation Mr. James R. C. Hazel Battle Creek Community Foundation Mr. Jack Hopkins Kalamazoo Community Foundation Ms. Mildred Jeffrey Michigan Women's Foundation David B. Kermedy Earhan Foundation Mr. James R. Kettler James A. Welch Foundation Olivia P. Maynard Les Cheneaux Area Mr. Craig Monette Lague, Newman & Irish Community Foundation Dr. William C. Richardson W. K. Kellogg Foundation Foundation Mrs. Margaret A. Riecker Harry A. & Margaret D. Towsley Mr. Leonard W. Smith Ethel and James Flinn Family Foundation Ms. Maureen H. Smyth C harles Stewart Mon Foundation Fred M. Woodruff, Jr. The Miller Foundation �10 Marketing and Communications Task Force Ms. Ruth Benedict Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan Mrs. Judy M. Carl Council of Michigan Foundations Robert S. Collier Council ofMichlgan Foundations roundation Neeta Delaney The Jackson County Community Mr. Allan D. Gilmour The Gilmour Fund Mitch Hurst Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Gerald Knight Speck.hard-Knight Charitable Foundation Mr. Craig McDonald Alden and Vada Dow Fund Mr. Mark Morley Morle) Foundation Mr. Tim Penning Grand Valley State Unversity Ms. Gail B. Powers-Schaub Council ofMichigan Foundations Ms. Vicki J. Rosenberg Council Of Michigan Foundations Robin Terry The Gordy Foundation Mr. Robert Tobin Williams Group �Membership Task Force �--- o-· .l9 ~"' · • uu} .JJ\.fll\,\,o Barry Community Foundation Detroit Neurosurgical Foundation Mr. C. David Campbell McGregor Fund Ms. Melonie B. Colaianne Masco Corporation Charitable Trust RobertS. Collier Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Jeri L. Fischer Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Susan Howbert Council of Michigan Foundations Mr. Gilbert Hudson Hudson-Webber Foundation Mr. David R. Lindberg Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Gail B. Powers-Schaub Council ofMichigan Foundations Mrs. Margaret A. Riecker Harry A. & Margaret D. Towsley Foundation Ms. Vicki J. Rosenberg Council Of Michigan Foundations Ms. Lois Shaevsky Shaevsky Family Foundation Foundation Dr. Ira Strumwasser Blue Cross Blue Shield ofMichigan Ms. Elizabeth C. Sullivan The Kresge Foundation Barbara Wertheimer DENSO International America, Inc. Ms. Kate Pew Wolters Steelcase Foundation Lloyd J. Yeo Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation �12 Services Task Force Mr. Michael M. Barry Joseph E. Beauchamp Trust Mr. C. David Campbell Ms. Jeri L. Fischer Council of Michigan Foundations Foundation Ms. Carolee Dodge Francis Dickmson County Area Community Mr. RichardT. Groos Barry Community Foundation Ms. Barbara Allen Hall Whirlpool Foundation Ms. Susan Howbert Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Ann K. Irish Elizabeth E. Kennedy Fund Ms. Linda D. May Arcus Foundation Ms. Marlies H. Parenti The Kresge Foundation Ms. Vicki J. Rosenberg Council Of Michigan Foundations The killman Foundation Ms Jeanne now Grand Traverse Regional Community Fow1dation McGregor Fund Ms. Kari Schlachtenhaufen Ms. Betsy Upton Stover Frederick S. Upton Foundation Ms. Barbara A. Willyard Community Foundation for Northeast Michigan �13 Technology Task Force Mr. Gavin Clabaugh Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Mr. Timothy L. Dechant W.K. Kellogg Foundation Mr. Richard Lowell Dunlap The Kresge Foundation Ms. Colleen Knight Branch County Community Foundation Ms. Dee Laskie The Skillman Foundation Michigan Ms. Karen L. Leppanen Community Foundation for Southeastern Mr. David R. Lindberg Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Elisha Marr Grand Rapids Community Foundation Kymberly Mulhern The Nokomis Foundation Ms. Gail B. Powers-Schaub Council ofMichigan Foundations Mr. Richard K. Rappleye Charles Stewart Mott FoundR1ion Ms. Vicki J. Rosenberg Council OfMichigan Foundations Mr. Donald G. Williamson McGregor Fund Mr. Timothy P. Wintermute The Hannan Foundation �14 Task Force Meeting Calendar- July through October 2001 • Wednesday, July li th 3:00- 4:30p.m. Initial Chairs Conference Call With All Chairs, All Directors • Wednesday, July 2S'h 3:00p.m.- 4 :30p.m . Marketing & Communications Task Force Conference Call • Monday, July 30th 10:00 a.m.-4:00p.m. Education & Networking Task Force Okemos Comfort Inn, Lansing • Wednesday, August I " 10:00 a.m.-4:00p.m . CMF Services Task Force University C lub, Lansing • Monday, August 13'h 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m . Membership Task Force Okemos Comfort Inn, Lansing • Friday, August 17ili 10:00 a.m.-4:00p.m. Government Relations Committee Sheraton Lansing Hotel • Friday, August 24ili 10:30a.m . Tech. Conference Call w/Dick Rappleye • Wednesday, August 29th 1:00 a.m.-2:30 p.m . Technology Task Force Convened @ CMF Office • Wednesday, August 29th 3-4:30 p.m . Education Offering Meeting (& Conf. Call) • September 4th 4-5:00 p.m . Marketing & Communications Prep. Task Force Conf. Call • September 6'h 9-10:30 a.m . Education & Networking Task Force Conference Call • September 7th I 0:00 a.m.- 4:00 p.m. Marketing & Comms. Task Force Meeting University Club in Lansing • September ll'b 3- 4:30 p.m . Technology Task Force Con f. Call • September 12'h 1:00- 3:00 p.m . CMF Program Directors/Publications Mtng. • September 131h 3- 5:00p.m. Services Task Force Con f. Call • September 14'h 10:00 am - 12:00 pm CMF Program Directors/Publications Mtng. • September 28'h 10:00-3:00pm Membership ·1ask Force City Club of Lansing • October 19!1' 2:30- 3:30p.m . Marketing & Communications Task Force Conference Call • October 22"d I0:00- I I :30 a.m . Services Task Force Conference Call • October 24'11 1:00- 2:30p.m . Education & Networking Task Force Conference Call I C"J'ICt.:hcr 'm«:nl-..:rf!:<,trm l'lann f.!!MIIn a,l. I nrcc \chcd II � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Task-Force-Committees Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book task force committees Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book task force committees. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50441 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/02dce14ec3a99b837364c950206e4ee1.pdf 426b8043d8f177f8436765f6f033f551 PDF Text Text 27 September 23, 2001 To: Dave Campbell, Chairman and Board of Trustees From: Elizabeth Sullivan, Chair, Education & Networking Task Force RE: Recommended Action Item The Education and Networking Task Force has had two productive meetings and approved at its September 6, 2001 meeting the following action item for discussion and approval: RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve a Core Curriculum for 2002 that will cover five key competency areas (governance, fmance, administration, grantmaking, and communications) and up to three issue areas of high concern to members. Background The Education and Networking Task Force endorses the creation of a regular series of educational programs that address the five competency areas of governance, finance, administration, grantrnaking and communication. The Committee has developed the following criteria for offering these programs: • • • • • Is designed for members first, non-member grantrnakers second Is offered at introductory, intermediate, and advanced levels Is offered on a three-year cycle (some programs multiple times during that period, others only once) Is delivered in a variety of live and electronic formats Is offered by CMF, by CMF in partnership with others, or under CMF sponsorship. In addition, the Committee feels it is important to enhance the five core competency areas through special programs for targeted audiences (by role, foundation type, issue). Such programming will include up to three programs on high priority issues of concern to members that are developed in consultation with the Public Policy Committee. The Committee has created the following list of high priority issues of concern and will ask CMF members to prioritize these issues at the Annual Conference and on-line following the Conference. Where appropriate CMF will partner with national affmity groups of grantmakers to produce these issue focused educational programs. �28 K-12 Education Access to Health Care Elderly/Elder Care Crime/Corrections Workforce Preparation Digital Divide Sprawl/Land use (environment) Child Care Youth Violence Prevention Diversity Organizational Effectiveness ofNPO Sector Civil Society/Community Building Families & Society Finally, the Committee has developed the following Decision-Making Criteria to assist staff in responding to requests for educational programming. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Is the program consistent with both CMF's mission and purposes? Does the program have broad appeal to the general membership or to a targeted segment of the membership? Does the curriculum represent current best practices and new research findings? Will the program challenge the membership to do bener? Is there a compelling need or opportunity to justify the program? Is CMF's involvement imperative to the success of the program? Does CMF have the capacity to develop and deliver the program (time, staff, knowledge, funds, etc.)? Does the program present an opportunity to partner and/or collaborate? Does the program offer CMF a fund development opportunity? Will CMF's involvement in the program impact its role in the community as a neutral (non-partisan) convener? Does the program present an opportunity to attract diverse audiences? Does the program have any implications for public policy? How will program costs be covered (dues, registration fees, grants, other)? If a member is asking CMF to prepare and present the program, is that member able to contribute to some or all of its costs? �29 September 23, 2001 TO: CMF Board ofTrustees FR: Richard K. Rappleye RE: Technology Task Force Recommendations The Technology Task Force co-conveners (Tim Dechant, Director of Technology, W.K. Kellogg Foundation; Richard Lowell Dunlap, Program Officer-Iofonnation Systems, K resge Foundation; Gavin Clabaugh Vice President and Dick Rappleye, Vice President, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation) have had several productive meetings together and with CMF management and are proposing the following action item for discussion and approval: RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve piloting "Rapid Response · System" in 2002 to obtain member feedback on time sensitive issues. Backgrow1d The TeclmoJogy Task Force was formed in summer 200 I and is being co-convened by theW.K. Kellogg Foundation, The Kresge Foundation, and the Charles Stewart Mon Foundation. Lead CMF staff for the Task Force is Gail Powers-Scbaub, Information Services Manager. The co-conveners have met several times with Ms. Powers-Schaub to develop a Briefing Paper that has been shared with the !!-member Task Force. On September II , 2001 , the Task Force met via conference call to discuss the Briefing Paper, its goals and timeline, and next steps. Prior to that meeting, the co-conveners met with CMF management to review immediate priorities for the Annual Members Meeting at the Annual Conference related that could be met with technology. The rapid response system that is being recommended is call Zoomerang and will allow CMF to obtain instant feedback from members, with the ability to target specific constituencies. Zoom erang is a division of MarketTools, the global dominant ASP for eResearc h and efeedback. The company provides advanced Web-hosted technology a nd advisory services to help businesses conduct cost-effective and secure Web-based market research. The results are captured and presented in graphically-rich formats in real-timewhich allows users to measure incoming responses and act on the findings very quickly. �30 We hope to demonstrate this electronic system at the Annual Conference through inviting members to vote on the Priority Issues discussed in the Education-Networking Task Force Report. The cost for Zoomerang is $500 for the first 1,000 survey responses with $500 for each additional 1,000 responses. We anticipate using the service four times in 2002 for budget of$2,000. Our first use of the services will be covered in this current budget. This Rapid Response System will allow members to have input into future directions related to CMF's Leadership purpose, specifically, opportunities to serve as an intermediary and priorities for issues facing Michigan that are of interest and concern to m embers. The Technology Task Force's work will commence in full upon completion of recommendations by the other Committees and Task Forces. It's goals are to develop recommendations in three areas: • A long-term technology plan for CMF • A process for on-going review/revision of CMF technology platform • Use of technology for specific programs, products, services, (drawing on recommendations from other task forces) Among the many areas the Task Force will address are two that have been identified by other Task Forces and CMF management. They are: ( I) electronic delivery systems for education programs to respond to members' expressed desire for on-demand access to information, resources, and educational opportunities; and (2) a restructuring of the CMF website to increase its value to members. �31 September 23, 2001 To: Members of the Board of Trustees From: Dave Campbell, Chairman, Services Task Force Re: Recommended Action Items The Services Task Force has had two highly productive meetings and approved at its September 13, 200 l meeting the following action items for cliscussion and approval: RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve a pilot program to charge members fees for individualized technical services on board training, grantmaking guidelines and program development, strategic planning, executive searches, and other services with guidelines for setting fees to be developed with input from the Finance Committee. RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the provision of the following services to eligible non-members as an enticement to membership: (a) One complimentary consultation on foundation establishment, Limited to providing a "how to" guide and verbal orientation. (b) If requested, foundation establishment services for a fee with a membership dues rebate possible upon joining CMF. RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the elimination of any individualized service to grantseekers beyond tbe current "Survey and Information for Seeking" now used. Background The Services Task Force was formed in summer 2001 and is served by 12 CMF members including 4 members of its Board ofTrustees. Lead CMF staff for this Task Force is Susan Howbert, Director, Family Philanthropy Services and Southeast Michigan Program. The Task Force met on August l, 2001 for a full -day meeting where it developed several recommendations regarding services CMF might provide to members, eligible nonmembers, grantseekers and others. There was consensus that CMF should establish a fee system for inclividualized technical assistance requested by members. For example, one executive search has recently been completed and another is under development. There was also agreement that CMF should not widely advertise these services in this pilot stage. �32 There was consensus on the part of the Task Force that CMF should provide a free consultation for those interested in starting a foundation. However, a fee should be charged if services requested include sample documents and individualized assistance. There was agreement that CMF should not provide free services to non-members in the hope that the new fo undation might become a member. Finally, the Task Force discussed individual services to grantseekers, who are often referred to CMF by members. There was consensus that beyond an updated version of the current publication currently produced, CMF should not use staff time to undertake searches for grantseekers. It is appropriate to refer these individuals to the Foundation Center Cooperating Collections throughout the State. CMF will continue to assist with group presentations to grantseekers, such as The Conversations With Program. In addition to the resolutions proposed above, the Task Force recommends that CMF do the following to support the pilot fee-based services program effective 2002. • Develop a series of high quality "How To" guides on topics such as mission, guidelines and program development, legal and accounting information, web site development, sample documents, and governance. The guides would be made available to members for free as a benefit of membership. They would be made available to non-members for a fee as a way of marketing CMF's expertise. · • Develop a high quality membership recruitment packet for use at first contact with start-ups and eligible non-members. This packet could include a guide to foundation establishment and several other items that would communicate the knowledge CMF has and shares with its members to strengthen their work. • Design and conduct market research via focus groups or other strategies to identify ways CMF can effectively serve advisors to the wealthy on a fee basis. Creating stronger relationships with advisors, educating them about philanthropy, and providing them with technical support in select areas are important to fulfilling CMF's purpose of increasing philanthropy in Michigan. �CMF Board Meeting Agenda October 2, 2001 Page 21 September 23,2001 To: Dave Campbell, Chairman and Board of Trustees From: Neeta Delaney, Chair, Communications and Marketing Task Force Re: Recommended Action Items The Communications and Marketing Task Force has had two meetings. Our initial efforts have focused on a review of CMF's logo and positioning statement as well as a careful analysis of CMF's core publications and website. While we recognize that our marketing activities, such as developing CMF's first marketing brochure, will occur after the work of the other Task Forces is complete, we feel that it is important to take advantage of the Annual Members Meeting on November I st. T he following action item is therefore presented for your consideration. RESOLVED that the Council of Michigan Foundations approve a new logo and positioning statement for usc at the 291h Annual Conference a nd introduction to the Members at the Annual Members Meeting on November 1, 2001. Background The CMF logo has been in use for the last 15 years. There is consensus on the part of the Task Force that it needs to be updated with a contemporary look. A review of the complexity of the logo indicated that some members do not recognize the map of the state that is in the current logo design. There was consensus that the logo should continue to use the emf letters because of name recognition, but that the logo should also have the full name of the organization attached. CMF has retained the award-winning firm of Olmsted Associates that works for the C.S. Mott Foundation to assist with this process. We look forward to sharing three possible logos for your review and action at the m eeting. CMF has never had a positioning statement- a short statement that captures the essence of what we do. For years, we have had the following statement at the bottom of the letterhead- "An Association of Foundations and Corporations Making Grants for C haritable Purposes." It is interesting to note that several members of our Task Force have never recognized this statement. There is consensus by the Task Force that we need an action oriented positioning statement that better captures what we do. 21 �C MF Board Meeting Agenda October 2, 2001 Page22 These are the eight draft statements that the Task Force is now working with: Advancing the State of Philanthropy Building A Culture of Giving Advancing Charitable Giving Philanthropy in Action Shaping the Spirit of Philanthropy Creating a Culture of Giving Advancing the State of Charitable Giving Securing the Future of Philanthropy We look forward to presenting our top three positioning statement options for your review at the Meeting on October 2. Ln addition we are working on a new design for the CMF home page to share with the Members on November 1. 22 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Task-Force-Recommendations Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book task force recommendations Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book task force recommendations. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50442 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7c42fd995e0e42709b6bc31cd8350841.pdf 39c09bfdc63c762f60148a4050c2a928 PDF Text Text CMF 1 Council of Michigan Foundations Servilli} g•att!moke.s. Adwncillg giving. Board of Trustees Meeting Tuesday, February 19, 2.002 10:00 a.m.- 3:00p.m. University C lub, Ballroom 3435 Forest Road Lansing, MI 48910 Phone: (5 17) 353-51 11 AGENDA I. Call to Order - C. David Campbell II. Action Items Tab A. Minutes of October 31, 2001 B. Treasurer's R eport 12/31/01 2 C. Investment Committee 12/31 /01 3 D. Membership & Marketing Committee 4 E. Executive Committee Minutes of January 22, 2002 Attachment A"2002-2003 Plan of Work" Attachment B "CMF 2002-03 Budget" Attachment C "Dues Increase" 5 F. Strategic Plan 6 ill. Discussion Items A. 30111 Annual Conference Update- Kari Schlachtenhaufen 7 B. Government Relations Report- Olivia P. Maynard 8 C. Learning to Give R eport- Russell G. Mawby 9 D. President's R eport - Rob Collier E. Other 10 �February 19, 2002 Agenda Page 2 IV. Adjournment Next Meeting: Regional Philanthropy Meeting Date: Thursday, June 13, 2002 Time: 6:30p.m. Location: Frederik Meijer Gardens 1000 East Beltline N.E . Grand Rapids, MI 49525 www .meijergardens.org Board of Trustees Meeting Date: Friday, June 14, 2002 Time: 8:30 a.m. Location: Amway Grand Plaza Hotel, Continental Room 187 Momoe, N .W. Grand Rapids, MI 49503 www .amwaygrand.com 1:\Scuddi ngton\Board ofTrustees\Meetings2002\Packet for 2-1 9-02\feb 19-2002agenda.doc � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2002_BB_2002-02-19_Board-Agenda Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book board agenda Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book board agenda. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50448 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002-02-19 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/14773ae9b4dafd45f9c52dbc8d396992.pdf 8da27f86178ab057929579d223ee2286 PDF Text Text CMF Council of M ich igan Foundations Tab 5 Attachment B Page 1 Serving gr11ntmokers. Advancing giving. Date: February 8, 2002 Memo to: CMF Board of Trustees From: Richard K. Rappleye, Chair Audit & Finance Committee RE: CMF 2002-03 Budget Resolved: That the CMF Board of Trustees approve the Council of Michigan Foundations' 2002-03 budget as recommended by the Audit & Finance and Executive Committees. After an extensive strategic planning process, management is pleased to present the attached budget for fiscal year 2002-03 (April I, 2002 to March 31, 2003). The Audit & Finance Committee approved the 2002-03 budget on January 17, 2002, with approval from the Executive Committee coming on January 22, 2002. Before reviewing the attached detailed budget management would like to highlight several issues that were examined during the budgeting process. Cost Containment Measures In looking at the next five years management has taken several steps to contain costs and in some cases reduce costs in the coming year, total estimated savings of $ 130,000. • • • • A position for an additional support person in Grand Haven that was budgeted in the current year will not be fill ed. The drug card and office co-pay has been increased resulting in an annual savings of $20,000 for 2002-03. With the recent resignation of the Assistant VP for Corporate & Educational Services, staff assignments have been restructured, along with the addition of an assistant in the Southeast Michigan office. These changes will result in a net savings of approximately $28,000 per year. The full-time community foundation Youth Project Coordinator position is currently being restructured to a consulting position, with a cost savings of $50,000 per year. CMF Dues Structure After several meetings with the Strategic Planning Task Force, Membership Task Force and Audit & Finance Committee, management is proposing that adjustments in the current dues structure be delayed until fiscal year 2003-04 . In fiscal year 2003-04 management is proposing to expand the current dues categories from 15 to 21 and with an across the board 20% increase. �2 Revenue Generation Options Based on input from the Strategic Planning Marketing and Membership Task Forces a list of fees for services has been developed to identify those services that are not considered part of regular membership dues. For fiscal year 2002-03 $15,000 has been budgeted as new revenue for member staff searches and board retreats. The Marketing task force has also recommended selling advertising space in some of the CMF publications. $8,000 in advertising income has been budgeted for the Michigan Scene. Southeast Michigan Office Thanks to the generation contributions from Hudson-Webber, McGregor and the Skillman Foundations, CMF was able to establish a southeast Michigan Office in September of 1997. For the past 3 Y2 years this office has been housed at the Skillman Foundation. Anticipated growth of Skillman's staff has resulted in the search for a new location to house this office. After exploring all the options with the CMF Audit & Finance Committee and CMF Chair, the most cost effective solution was to locate a small office at 333 West Fort Street. Funding for this office in the past came from two sources, the first being the three funders mentioned above and the second being CMF Core operations that funded the Director's position for this office. For 2002-03 and 2003-04 funding to support the operations of this office will come from excess administration dollars earned from special projects, primarily the Tobacco Settlement grant from the State of Michigan. Future years will be supported by the dues increase budgeted for 2003-04. Annual operating costs for this office are budgeted at $60,000 for 2002-03. Strategic Development Fund Most of the new services developed during the strategic planning process will be covered by the budgeted dues increase scheduled for 2003-04. At this point, technology appears to be the main area where special funding will be required to complete the recommendations in the strategic plan. The Technology Task Force has started to analyze the recommendations that have surfaced from the other Task Forces, with the goal of finalizing a long-range technology plan by June 2002. Currently the following special funding items are anticipated, with final numbers anticipated by June 2002. Website Re-design Membership Database On-line Registration Module Technology Consultant Graphic Designer CMF Publications $200,000 50,000 15,000 10,000 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc �3 As you review the CMF Core Operations budget you will note that total expenses are projected to increase by $362,000 with a corr,e sponding increase in revenue to cover those costs. This is due to the following reasons: CMF Annual Conference Returning to previous year's attendance levels Expanded programming for members Expenses to produce the 13u' Edition of Michigan Foundations Directory Additional operating expenses for the new Southeast Michigan Office Core Operations Revenue Note 1: Member Contributions In budgeting dues for 2002-03, member assets have been projected to decrease by 8% for the year ending 12-31-01. This projection is based the DOW being down 7.10% and the S&P 500 being down 13.04%, for the year ending 12-31-01. The increase from the prior year is due to new members budgeted for 2002-03. Note 2: Additional Member Contributions Additional member contributions are anticipated to increase slightly to the levels experienced in previous years. Note 3: Other Grants Thanks to the generous contributions from the Hudson-Webber Foundation, The Skillman Foundation and McGregor Fund, CMF established a Southeast Michigan office in September 1997. During this time period CMF has provided funding for the staffing of this office through general membership contributions. The three funders mentioned above provided office space, along with general operating support. Fiscal year 2002-03 will be a transition period as CMF starts to absorb the costs for this office in its Core Services budget. This transition will involve the relocating this office from The Skillman Foundation, to 333 West Fort Street, Detroit, in Janumy 2002. In order to absorb the operating costs of this office that have been supported by special grants, CMF will use surplus personnel/administrative dollars earned from special projects. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc �4 Management is anticipating we will have one more year of these surplus dollars to support the operating costs of the Southeast Michigan office. A projected dues increase in 2003-04 will complete the transition of member dues fu lly supporting the cost of this office, that will provide services to both Family Foundations and Corporate Foundations and Corporate Giving Programs around the state. Note 4: Conference & Meetings $80,000 of the increase from the prior year is due to the anticipation of attendance at the annual conference increasing to 800 from the 700 that attended the conference in Detroit. Part of the long-term funding plan for CMF is to bring the annual conference registration fees in line with other conferences of similar size. The first year of the two-year phase in period, calls for raising full registration fees from $450 to $525, raising an additional $50,000 in revenue, with the second year (2003-04) increasing another $75 to $600. The remaining increase is due to the following educational opportunities that are new for 2002-03 or have been expanded from previous years. Event 3 regional members meetings Investment seminar series 3 3 special issues meetings Introduction to Governance Advance Governance Advance Grantmaking Learning Circle Family Foundations Family Foundation Programming. Corporate Seminars Revenue $26,000 9,000 5,300 11,800 14,500 32,300 5,000 25,000 11,000 Expenditures $26,000 9,000 5,300 11,800 14,500 32,300 5,000 25,000 11,000 Note 5: Publications & Library Services The increase from the prior year is due to the publication of the 13 1h Edition of the Michigan 111 Foundation Directory, which should be ready for distribution by December 2002. The 13 Edition is projected to net a profit of$45,000 over a two year period. Note 6: Other Income/Consulting 2002-03 is the first year CMF will be selling advertising space in the Michigan Scene. $8,000 in income has been projected for 3 issues. The remaining $15,000 in revenue represents revenue for member staff searches and facilitation of member board retreats. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc �5 Note 7: Investment Income Investment income has been budgeted to remain relatively modest due to the drop in interest rates over the past several months. Expenses Note 8: Wages An overall wage increase of 4% has been budgeted for 2002-03, which is in line with anticipated increases by other associations around the country. The increase from the prior year is due to the following 4% wage increase Re-allocate staff time from special projects to member services $30,000 18,000 Note 9: Occupancy The increase from the prior year is due to the lease costs associated with the Southeast Michigan office that should be ready for occupancy in January 2002. Note 10: Telephone The increase from the prior year is primarily due to the costs associated with the Southeast Michigan office. Note 11: Postage The increase from the prior year is due to the following: $4,000 6,500 Note 12: Supplies $2,500 of the increase from 2001-02 is due to supplies associated with the 13 1h Edition of the Directory. $5,000 of the increase is due to costs associated with the Southeast Michigan office. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.1 9.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc �6 Note 13: Equipment & Furniture Items budgeted for 2002-03 are: Copier Grand Haven office Misc. 16,000 7,000 Note 14: Technology In planning for CMF's long-term technology needs the Technology Task Force has recommended a reserve be set aside to cover those purchases that are budgeted on a 3-4 year cycle. By including this reserve in the attached budget this line item should remain relatively constant over the next 3-5 years. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc �7 CMF Technology 2002-03 Detail Software/ MS Office Upgrades Add 3 user licenses iMIS iMIS Advance order entry Zoomerang NT/2000 Server System Upgrades Broadcast Faxing Solution Mise Cost 6,800 7,200 9,500 1,000 1,500 1,400 6,600 34,000 Hardware Replace 6 workstations NT Exchange Server Laser Printer Mise 14,000 2,800 900 2,100 20,300 Support Consultant daily operations iMIS Annual Support Fee MIP G/L Annual Support Southeast Michigan office support Mise 46,000 2,400 1,500 1,400 300 51,600 Internet Connection/Website Updates Grand Haven office connection Southeast Michigan office connection 3,600 2,000 5,600 Reserve set aside to purchase equip in future Total 16,000 127,000 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.1 9.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc �8 Note 15: Association Dues The increase from the prior year is due to an increase in the association dues paid to the Forum of RAGS, which is based on a percentage of our Core budget. Note 16: Publications The increase from the prior year is due to the following items: 13u' Edition of Directory Increase issues of Family Philanthropist from 2 to 3 Corporate Matching Gifts Marketing Brochure $37,000 2,500 4,000 3,100 Note 17: Professional 2002-03 Budget includes the following: Audit Legal Public Affairs Associates Newsclipping Service Misc. $ 12,300 7,000 12,000 4,000 3,700 Note 18: Travel The increase from the prior year is due to the travel costs associated with the Southeast Michigan office w hich were previously covered by special grants. Note 19: Trainings Two new staff trainings are budgeted for 2002-03. Facilitation training staff Customer service training staff Note 4: Conference & Meetings See note under revenue S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.1 9.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc $3,000 2,000 �9 Note 20: Overhead Allocation In 2000-01 CMF established a policy of charging an overhead rate of 26% to special projects, where possible, to properly charge a portion of the infrastructure costs that are necessary to take on those special projects. Allocations for 2002-03 are as follows. $8,800 11 ,000 6,000 3,200 Tobacco Settlement IDA Project Learning to Give Michigan AIDS Fund Endowment Funds Investment Income for 2002-03 is budgeted at 0%. Expenses are budgeted based on a 5% spending policy (using a twenty-quarter rolling average), which was adopted by the Board of Trustees. William W. Allen Fund The purpose of this fund is to further the understanding of philanthropy in federal and state legislative and regulatory matters. The fund was established with contributions from CMF members in honor of William Allen, who was the first CMF Government Relations Committee Chainnan. Expenses for 2002-03 are for the Annual Legislative trip to Washington DC, scheduled for early February 2003. Russell G. Mawby Fund to Improve and Increase Philanthropy The fund was established to honor Dr. Mawby's contributions to Michigan philanthropy. The purpose of this fund is to improve and increase philanthropy by continuing and expanding CMF's efforts to enhance philanthropy and expand charitable resources available in the State of Michigan. Ruth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids This fund was established in December 1995, with a $500,000 directed contribution from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, by Ruth and Russ Mawby. The purpose of this fund is to improve and increase philanthropy through youth involvement in the State of Michigan. This fund will be used to support the work of summer interns at CMF along with funding the costs of the regional YAC and YAC Advisor training sessions. Dorothy A. Johnson Educational Fund The Dorothy A. Johnson Endowment Fund was established in 1999 to honor the work of our President Emeritus. The purpose of this fund is to support speaker expenses at the Annual S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.1 9.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc �10 Conference and promote the principles and practices of effective grantmaking. In keeping with the endowment fund spending policy, expenses of 5% have been budgeted for 2002-03. Community Foundation Endowment Fund The Community Foundation Endowment Fund was established from the interest earnings off the Kellogg grants to establish the Youth Challenge endowment funds and technical assistance being provided to community foundations. This fund is being used to support the ongoing core technical support to community foundations. The income line item represents the administrative fee of 50 basis points CMF receives to administer the investments of the KYIP project. The other income of$42,500 budgeted for 2002-03 represents the estimated fees on this project. MCFYP Endowment This fund was established from the surplus challenge grant dollars that remained at the end of youth challenge grant program. The purpose of this fund is to support the ongoing technical assistance and training needs of the 86 community foundation youth advisory committees in Michigan.. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.1 9.02MeetingMaterials\DRLBudgetMemo 2-19-02-a.doc �11 Council of Michigan Foundations Budget Summary 2002-03 CMF Core Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Spendable Income Endowment Funds Conference & Meetings Income Publications & Library Services Other Income Investment Income Total Revenues Program Expenses Wages Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Computer Association Dues Books & Subscriptions Publications Professional & Contracted Services Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meeting Overhead Allocation Total Administrative $ 808.000 200,000 65,000 Endowment Funds $ $ $ 3,500.000 652,000 101,000 23,000 60,000 1,909,000 707,000 58,000 35,000 9,100 53,600 43,500 7,300 23,000 127,000 22,000 7,000 110,500 3g,ooo 49,000 6,000 641,000 (29,000) 1,909,000 7,500 42,500 549,700 18,000 3,525,500 330,500 1,200 12,500 3.000 15.500 6.000 2,600 1,200 13,800 500 637,400 50,000 1g,900 53,000 25.780 29,000 459,000 47,000 64,220 85.500 25,800 1,461,700 549,700 6,000 35.000 87,000 1.003,278 9 ,768,301 (507,200) $ 1,003,278 $ 9.261,101 808,000 200 000 3,565,000 507,200 652,000 108.500 65,500 78,000 5,984,200 1,674.900 109,200 47,500 12,100 75,100 84.500 9.900 24,200 227,800 22.500 7,000 159,400 551,000 121 ,780 6,000 790,720 (3,200) 3,920,400 140,000 140,000 2,836,500 2,976,500 2,836,500 2,976,500 (912,700) Excess Revenues Over Expenditures dlindberglbudgets/02-03/CMF FS 02-03.xls-summ Total 507.200 Grants Challenge Grants Mini-grants Team Up/First Deal/Collaborative Computer Grants Other Total Grants Beginning Net Assets Transfer to Spendable Income Excess Revenues over Expenditures Ending Net Assets Special Projects 7.920,128 (912,700) $7,007,428 $ (912,700) 18,691.707 (912,700) 17,779,007 �12 Council of Michigan Foundations Core Operations Budget 2002-03 Projected 2001-02 Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference & Meetings Income Publications & Library Services Other Income/Consulting/advertising Investment Income Total Revenues Program/Admin Ex penses Wages Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Technology Association Dues Books & Subscriptions Publications Professional & Contracted Services Travel Staff Training Conference & Meetings Overhead allocation to Special projects Total Program/Admin Expenses Net Beginning Net Assets CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE Ending Net Assets dlindberg/budgets/02-03/CMF FS 02-03.xls-1 $ 767,000 190,000 48,000 380,000 50,000 0 50,000 1,485,000 653,000 46,000 26,000 7, 100 42,000 35,000 6,600 23,000 112,000 19,000 7,000 68,300 38,000 42,000 6.000 450,000 (34,000) 1,547,000 Budget 2002-03 $ 808,000 200,000 65,000 652,000 101,000 23,000 60,000 1,909,000 Note 1 Note 2 Note 3 Note 4 Note 5 Note 6 Note 7 707,000 58,000 35,000 9,100 53,600 43,500 7,300 23.000 127,000 22,000 7,000 110,500 39,000 49,000 6,000 641,000 (29,000) 1,909 ,000 Note 8 Note9 Note 10 ($62,000) $0 1,065,278 (62.000) $1,003,278 1,003,278 0 $1 ,003,278 Note 11 Note 12 Note 13 Note 14 Note 15 Note 16 Note 17 Note 18 Note 19 Note4 Note 20 �13 Council of Michigan Foundations Endowment Funds Budget 2002-03 Maw by Allen Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Spendable Income Endowment Fund Conference Income Publications & Library Services Other Income Investment Income Total Revenues Community ducatlon Foundation MCFYP ndowmo Fund Endowment Total $0 $0 $0 so so so so 7,900 65,000 35,000 48,000 300,000 51.300 507.200 42.500 7,900 Program Expenses Salaries & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture computflf Association Dues Books & Subscriptions Publications Professional & Contracted Services Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meeting Total Administrative 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 48,000 7,000 3,000 1.500 42,500 342,500 51,300 549,700 277.000 1,200 12.000 3,000 12,500 5,500 2.600 1,200 12.000 46,500 500 330,500 1,200 12.500 3.000 15,500 6000 2.600 1200 13.800 500 15,000 3.000 19.900 53,000 25.780 500 500 300 0 2,900 0 4,000 0 1,000 7,900 10,000 50,000 Grants Mini-Grants General Purpose Challenge Grants Grants Committed Not Paid Affiliation Mini-Grants Computer Grants Computer Loan Other Grants Total Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 0 0 Beginning Fund B alance Transfer to Spendable Income Activity Ending Fund B alance Maw by Kids 5,000 65,000 7,000 3,000 3,780 9,720 35,000 48.000 48,000 342.500 51 .300 64,220 549,700 0 0 0 0 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 877,576 164,233 1,375,588 768,511 5,577,193 (7,900) (300,000) (65.000) (35,000) (48,000) 0 0 $156,333 $1 ,310,588 $733,511 $829,576 $5,277.193 dlindberg/budgets/02-03/Endowment Funds 02-03.xls-summ 1,005.200 (51 ,300) $953.900 9.768,301 (507.200) $9.261,101 �14 Council of Michigan Foundations Member Services 2002-03 Budget CMF Co re Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Spendable Income Endowment Funds Conference & Meetings Income Publications & Library Services Other Income/Consulting/advertising Investment Income Total Revenues Program/Admln Ex penses Wages Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Computer Association Dues Books & Subscriptions Publications Professional & Contracted Services T ravel Staff Training Conference & Meetings Overhead allocation to Special projects Total Program/Admin Expenses Net dlindberg/budgets/02-03/CMF FS 02-03.xls-2 $ Member Services Total Community Endow Fund 808,000 200,000 65,000 $ $ 300,000 652,000 101,000 23,000 60,000 1,909,000 707,000 58,000 35,000 9,100 53,600 43,500 7,300 23,000 127,000 22,000 7,000 110,500 39,000 49,000 6,000 641,000 (29,000) 1,909,000 $0 42,500 342,500 277,000 1,200 12,000 3,000 12,500 5,500 2,600 1,200 12,000 500 15,000 342,500 $0 808.000 200,000 65,000 300,000 652,000 101 ,000 65,500 60,000 2,251 ,500 984,000 59,200 47,000 12,100 66,100 49,000 9,900 24,200 139,000 22,500 7,000 110,500 39,000 64,000 6,000 641 ,000 (29,000) 2,251 ,500 $0 �15 Council of Michigan Foundations Special Projects Budget 2002-03 K-12 Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other GraFlts Spendable Income Endowment Funds Conference & Meetings Income Publications & Library Services Other Income Investment Income Total Revenues Program Expenses Wages Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Computer Association Dues Books & Subscriptions Publications Professional & Contracted Services Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meeting Overhead Allocation Total Administrative Tobacco Set11emont IDA $2,500,000 $1 ,000.000 18,000 18,000 Total 3,500,000 7,500 7.500 7,500 18,000 3,525,500 2,500,000 1,000,000 91,200 146,200 15,000 637,400 50,000 20,000 6,000 15,000 6.000 35,000 75,000 2,000 10,000 87,000 25,000 96,000 30,000 4,000 143.000 7,000 220,000 10,000 29,000 459,000 4 7.000 400,000 35,000 30,000 6,000 717,000 Grants Challenge Grants Mini-grants Team UpfFirst DealfCollaborative Computer Grants Other Total Grants 50,000 50,000 Excess Revenues Over Expenditures (749,000} Beginni ng Net Assets Excess Revenues over Expenditures Ending Net Assets 1,300,000 (749,000) $ 551.000 $ dlindbergfbudgets/02-03/CMF FS 02-0J.xls-3 WKKFIV 8,000 11,000 357,200 8,800 100,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 s 47,500 287.500 85.500 25,800 1,461 ,700 140,000 140.000 386,500 386,500 140,000 2,836,500 2,976,500 256,300 (420.000) (912,700) 5,500,000 1.120.128 256,300 (420,000) 5.756,300 $ 700,128 7,920,128 (912,700) 7,007,428 s � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2002_BB_2002-02-19_Budget Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book budget Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book budget. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50449 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002-02-19 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e25422e77573802f5bb770b9545ca4ad.pdf a16e82eb508d9f1810b4815753729537 PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Found-ations Tab 7 Page I S<'rving grantmokets. Advanclng giving. February 7, 2002 Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chainnan, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Kari Schlachtenhaufen and Libby Maynard, Co-Chairs 30th Annual Conference Program Committee Re: 301h A nnual Conference Update Plans are well underway for the 30th Annual Conference on Mackinac Island. The Conference will start on Sunday, September 29, and end Tuesday, October 1. Networking lunches will take place from noon to 1:30 p.m. on Sunday. The Board Meeting will be held from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. We have asked for permission to have the opening reception at the Governor's Residence from 5:00 to 6:30p.m. We have also invited the Governor and First Lady to join us at the Conference to receive a special tribute from Michigan grantmakers for all they have done to promote giving and volunteering in our state. In discussing potential Honorary Chairs for the Conference, there was consensus that CMF should recognize an Island family. While many families have played an important role, Dan and Amelia Musser, owners of the Grand Hotel, are the first choice of everyone we have talked to. An invitation has been extended to them. We are excited to share that our first plenary speaker, Susan Stamberg, special correspondent from NPR, is confirmed. Enclosed is background information on Susan. Invitations have also been extended to Ken Bums and Fred Rogers to be our other two plenary speakers. The Program Committee will be having its first meeting on February 18 to discuss the theme and sessions for the Conference. We will be meeting at the Collaborative Center of the Michigan Virtual University in East Lansing and look forward to reporting on the results of this meeting. Because of the layout of the Grand Hotel, we will only be offering 18 concurrent sessions, instead of the nomml 36. The Committee is being charged with designing two simulation sessions and a session for experienced grantmakers as well. Wes Mauer, Trustees of the Mackinac Island Community Foundation, has agreed to serve as Co-Chair of the Host Committee. The Committee will convene for its first meeting in March. Hotel space at the Grand Hotel is limited on Saturday evening so it will be important to let CMF know if you plan on arriving on Saturday or Sunday. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2002_BB_2002-02-19_Conference-Update Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book conference update Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book conference update. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50450 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002-02-19 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9fed0c1ff17ba3493d93291f9795001a.pdf b269313cfdb4d1cf6b68246534d590db PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Found-ations Tab 6 Attachment A S<'rving grantmokets. Advanclng giving. February 10, 2002 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chairman and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Vicki Rosenberg, Vice President & Chief Operating Officer Re: Diversity Statement RESOLVED that the Council of Michigan Foundations adopt this value statement on diversity and inclusion: "We strive to model and promote diversity and inclusion as a means to strengthen the work of grantmakers. We do so by working to create an environment in which men and women from different national origins, ethnicities, races, and cultures, of different generations, religions, economic backgrounds, and sexual orientations, and with different skills, abilities, lifestyles, and beliefs are respected, valued, and encouraged to participate. We seek to understand, represent, and share the range of philanthropic perspectives held and traditions followed by our members. And, we actively attempt to serve a diverse membership, be governed by a diverse Board of Trustees, and to attract and retain diverse staff members. We encourage members to join with us by developing their own commitment to diversity and inclusion for the future of philanthropy in Michigan." Background At the May 2001 Board Meeting, the Board of Trustees reviewed and endorsed a draft values statement for CMF and discussed the best way to include its commitment to diversity and inclusion. The Board of Trustees asked staff to develop background materials for Board review at the October 2, 2001 Special Board Meeting. On October 2, Bob Tobin of the William Group facilitated a Board discuss ion about diversity and inclusion and shared sample statements identified by staff as most closely matching the intentions discussed at the May 2001 meeting. Trustees identified key elements and asked staff to develop these elements into a draft statement for review at the October 3 1, 200 1 Board Meeting. At the October 31, 2001 Board Meeting, the Board of Trustees reviewed the resulting draft statement and made several suggestions for wording that would clarify CMF's purpose in having such a value statement. On December 5, 200 1, the Long-Range Planning Committee reviewed and endorsed the revised statement reflecting the Trustees suggestions from October 31. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2002_BB_2002-02-19_Diversity-Statement Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book diversity statement Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book diversity statement. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50451 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002-02-19 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/dcdfeab825f8ef6bbddbbfdd37ed6d37.pdf cff8f273801f7975789ffe685c3344f9 PDF Text Text CMF Tab 2 Page 1 Council of Mich igan foundat ions. Serving grcmtmokcts.AdWJIKing giving. Date: February 8, 2002 Memo to: CM.F Board of Trustees From: David R. Lindberg RE: CM.F & Supporting Organizations 12-31-01 Financial Statements Resolved: That the CMF Board of Trustees approve the internal financial report for the nine month period ending December 31, 2001, as recommended by the Audit & Finance Committee. Enclosed is the December 31,2001 financial report for the Council of Michigan Foundations and its supporting organizations, which has been reviewed by the Audit & Finance Committee. As you review the attached CM.F Core Operations Internal Statement of Activities you will note that a deficit of $58,000 is projected for the 2001-02 fiscal year. This is due to the following reasons. Delay in iMIS database u grade, originally budgeted for the previous year Projected deficit Annual Conference $30,000 $40,000 Core Operations Note 1: Member & Additional Contributions Based on receipts through December 31, 2001, it appears both regular and additional member contributions will total $957,000, versus a budget of $965,000. Note 2: Conference Income & Expenses Based on the latest financial results it appears the Annual Conference will result in a deficit of $40,000, which is down from the estimated $50,000 - $70,000 loss report at the October CM.F Board meeting. Management was able to reduce the deficit by instituting cost savings when it appeared the overall attendance would be down from previous years. �2 Note 3: Publication Income The variance from budget is the result of Directmy sales falling off sooner than anticipated. Ads have been placed in Michigan Nonprofit Association's monthly newsletter, which should boost sales between now and the end of the year. Inventory at the end of December was as follows: Books- 874 (started with 2,500) CD's - 157 (started with 1,000) Based on the latest projected sales for the Directory it appears we should still turn a slight profit on the 12th Edition. Note 4: Investment Income The variance from budget is the result of money market rates falling into the 2% range, which is 60% below last year's rates (all operating funds are invested in money market accounts). This reduction should result in a $45,000 budget variance. Note 5: Salaries The projected variance from budget is primarily due to a budgeted support position that will not be filled and the Assistant VP for Corporate & Educational Services position that was vacated in November. Through restructuring of staff duties, services provided by the VP have been reallocated to other staff. Note 6: Computer Due to the delay in upgrading the iMIS software (membership & meeting database) last year, $21,000 in expenses that were budgeted for 2000-01 , have hit our current fiscal year, with another $15,000 projected by the end of the year. This should result in 2001-02 being over budget by $36,000. Currently $45,000 that was budgeted for 2001-02 to purchase an on-line registration module for iMIS, is being used to purchase Citrix software and equipment that will allow staff remote access to their desktop computers. Note 7: Travel The variance from budget is primarily due to the increase in air travel and fuel costs experienced this year. S:\ Bourds and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLTreasReportMeet 2-1 9-02.doc �3 Endowment Funds Note 8: Other Grants- MCFYP Endowment The W.K. Kellogg Foundation approved the transfer of$1,055,505 ofunused challenge grant funds to the MCFYP Endowment Fund. This fund will be used to continue the technical assistance to community foundation Youth Advisory Councils (YACs). Note 9: Professional Fees - Russell G. Mawby Fund The Russell Mawby Fund has been used to support strategic planning expenses, which are broken down as follows: Williams FERA Instrumented group FERA members survey Conference calls, mise $27,566 2,500 14,765 8,215 Expenses for the strategic planning process starting in 2000-01 through 12-31 -01 equal $86,313, versus a board approved budget of$90,000. Note 10: Inter Fund Grants- DAJ Educational Fund $3,466 of the $10,000 available annually from the Kresge Foundation, for principles and best practices, was used to subsidize the Grant Making Basics seminar in August 2001. The remaining balance was used to bring Sandy Hughes and a presenter from Caplin & Drysdale to the November 2001 CMF Annual Conference. S:\ Bourds and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLTreasReportMeet 2-1 9-02.doc �Council of Michigan Foundations & Supporting Organizations Consolidated Balance Sheet Dec ember 31, 2001 II Supporting Organizations I CMF Core & Special Project s ASSETS Cash & Equivalents Investments Due From Other Funds Property, Plant & Equipment- Net Other Assets Grants Receivable Total Assets LIABILITIES Accounts Payable Other Liabilities Grants Payable Total Liabilities NET ASSETS (FUND BALANCE) Unrestricted & Temp Restrict. Endowment Funds KYIP Fund Total Net Assets Total Liabilities & Net Assets d lindbergffsstate/fs0 1-02JFS 12-31...01-1 $2,148,927 1,791,008 499,528 9,922 1,770,838 $6,220,223 Endowment Funds MCFV $249,769 10,109,441 (268, 107) $10,091,103 $6,355,207 11,447,664 (1 ,472,916) 15,954 (67) $274,993 (49,985) 1,761 626,829 $853,598 $16,345,842 $233,739 15,614 $ $ 249,353 Mich igan AIDS Fund 0 5.970.870 148,301 226,343 226,343 259,217 407,518 4,573.049 446.080 Tota l $9,028,896 21,557,105 0 517,243 9,855 2,397,667 $33,510,766 $382,040 15,614 485,560 883,214 5,970,870 10,091 ,103 11 ,546,450 16,119,499 446,080 10.989.999 10,091 ,103 11,546,450 32,627,552 $6,220,223 $10,091 ,103 $16,345,842 $853,598 $33,510,766 10,091,103 �Council of Michigan Foundations & Supporting Organizations Consolidated Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Assets 4-1-01 to 12-31-01 Core O(!eratlons Council of Michigan Foundations CMF Special Endowment Funds P roJects II CMF Total Supporting Organizations Michigan AIDS MCFV Fund Combined Total Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference Income Publications & Libra ry Services Other Income Investm ent Income Total Revenues s 685,520 194,046 8,417 376,278 3 1,783 (895 ) 34,124 1 ,329,273 $0 $2,141 ,002 134,192 1,803 1,109,441 3,835 425 88,97 1 2,365,968 234,478 1,348,179 786,534 13,412 8 ,086 151 18,66 1 14,289 262,650 538 9,567 1,881 7,625 3,062 2,432 $685,520 194,046 3,258,860 514,305 34,011 (895 ) 357,573 5,043,420 $0 569,800 13,365 1,494 15,332 396,387 996,378 $935,578 88,756 11,460 947,038 $685,520 194,046 4,764,238 527 ,670 35,505 14,437 765,420 6,986,836 Program/Admin Expenses Salaries & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Computer Association Dues Books & S ubscriptions Publications & Printing Professional & Contracted Services Travel T raining & Seminars Conh::!r~ l u.;e & Meeliny Ovemead Allocation to Spec Proj Total Program/Admin 469,647 32,951 15,638 5,147 26,488 14,885 6,053 1,612 89,398 17,320 3,901 38,771 32,105 28,259 4,721 438,589 (25,4881 1 ,199,977 2,132 5,064 139 4 ,797 50,502 515,024 90,104 10,899 100, 144 25,488 1,645,426 9,351 151,650 13,444 8,274 420 1,970 9,295 992 12,301 14,109 4,231 1,518,831 46,901 33,291 7,179 52,774 32,236 8,485 3,744 110,334 17,752 9 ,213 91,291 600,263 119,908 15,620 542,944 120 7,098 387,308 31 ,275 6,440 51.31 1 55 3,296 42,129 8,264 1,045 5,602 1,759,237 60,345 43,078 7,599 55,694 46,624 9,477 16,045 133,794 17,752 9,388 101,685 1,029,700 159,447 23, 105 599,857 365,363 3,210,766 589,2 15 272,846 4 072 827 15,872 293 515 2,018 53,134 1,545 1,513 950 5,093 GRANTS Mini Grants Challenge Grants Affiliation Mini-Grants Computer Grants Computer Loan Other Grants Total Grants Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129,296 - 39, 108 96,292 6,000 30,402 3.145,403 3.145,403 10,000 10,000 3,155,403 3,155.403 1,292,955 1,464.757 813,19 7 813.197 5 ,261,555 5.433,357 (2,42 4,861) 972,816 (1 ,322 ,749) (1 ,057,594) (139,005) (2,519,348) 9,01 4,976 103,311 972,816 $10 ,091 ,103 17,281,411 103,31 1 (1 ,322.749) $ 16,061.973 17,280,404 (103,31 1) (1 ,057,594) $16,119.499 585,085 35,146.900 (139,005) $446,080 (2,519,348) $32.627,552 Beginning Net Assets Transfer from MCFV 1 ,065,278 7,201 ,157 Change in N e t Assets 129,296 $ 1,19 4,574 (2,424,861) $4,776,296 Ending Net Assets 39,108 96,292 6,000 30,402 �CMF Endowment Funds Consolidated Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Assets 4-1-01 to 12-31-01 Allen Fund Revenues Member Contributions A dditional Mem ber Contributions Other Grants Conference Income Publications & Library Services Other Income Investm ent Incom e Total Revenues $ Russell G Mawby Fund Maw by F und For Kids Endowment Funds Johnson Community Educational Foundation Fund Endowment $ $ s $ 50 MCFYP Endowment $ $ 1,600 48,286 1,059,505 1 '1 09,441 3,835 425 1,108,300 26,000 21 ,758 23,358 142,692 190,978 18,778 1,078,283 234,478 1,348, 179 639 ,900 1,774,200 200,65 1 538 8,720 1,881 7,614 2,922 2,432 45,434 262,650 538 9,567 1,881 7,625 3,062 2,432 13,832 293 515 780 267,000 750 12,000 1,500 9,000 7,500 2 ,500 750 9,300 500 3,835 425 2,280 2,280 Program/Admin Expenses Salaries & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Com puter Association Dues Books & Subscriptions Publications & Printing Professional & Contracted Service~ Travel Tra ining & Sem inars Conference & Meeting Total Program/Admin 32,050 32,525 16,920 20,755 16,565 11 1,260 2,018 54,306 3,949 22,543 847 140 88 166 1,379 15,872 293 515 2,018 53, 134 1,545 66 239,718 167 48,747 4,231 365,363 - - 53,046 Total 9 Month Budget 1213112001 49 49 16,800 60,000 6,750 Note 8 Note 9 62 ,750 4 57,100 GRANTS - Mini Grants Challenge Grants Affiliation Mini-Grants Com puter Grants Computer Loan Other Grants Total Grants - Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 2.280 Beginn ing Net Assets Transfer from Ot her Assets Excess Revenues over Expenditures Ending Net Assets 173,633 dlindberglfinstaU01 -02/FS 12-31-01 -3 (21 ,781 ) 1,44 1,288 2,280 (2 1,78 1) $175,913 $1 ,4 19,507 (1 ,788) - 10,000 10,000 - - - - - 13,309 (48,740) 784,311 .8 86,026 (1,788) $782,523 13,309 $899,335 5,729,718 103,31 1 (48,740) $5,784,289 10,000 10,000 _ _ _ _ _ Note 10 972,816 1,317,100 9,01 4,976 103,31 1 1,029,536 972,816 $1,029,536 510,091, 103 9,01 4,976 1,029,536 1,317,100 $ 10 ,332 ,076 �Council of Michigan Foundations Core Operations Internal Statement of Activities 4-01-01 to 12-31-01 12 Month Budget 2001 -02 Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference & Meetings Publications & Library Services Other Income Investment Earnings Total Revenues 705,000 260,000 516,800 94,000 1,000 90,000 1,666,800 Program/Admin Expenses 717,000 Salaries & Benefits Occupancy 42,000 Telephone 32,000 Equipment Lease & Maintenance 5,000 45,000 Postage 35,000 Supplies Insurance 6,600 Equipment & Furniture 31 ,000 Computer 77.000 Association Dues 18,500 Books & Subscriptions 7,000 66,000 Publications 40,000 Professional & Contracted Services Travel 34,000 Training & Seminars 6,000 538,700 Conference & Meetings Overhead Allocation to Spec Projects (34,000) Total Program/Admin 1,666,800 9 Month Actual 12/31/2001 9 Month Budgeted 12/31/2001 Projected 2001 -02 $767,000 200,000 48,000 380,000 45,000 $685,520 194,046 8,417 376,278 31,783 (895) 34,124 1,329,273 $665,000 250 ,000 Note 1 501 ,000 84,000 750 67,500 1,568,250 Note 2 Note 3 Note 4 45,000 1,485,000 469,647 32,951 15,638 5,147 26,488 14,885 6,053 1,612 89.398 17,320 3,901 38,771 32,105 28,259 4,721 438,569 (25,488) 1' 199,977 540,000 31 ,500 24 ,200 3,750 33 ,750 26,300 6,600 28,000 57.750 17' 100 5,400 49,500 33 ,000 25,500 4,500 511,700 (25,500) 1,373,050 Note 5 653,000 46,000 26,000 7,100 42,000 35,000 6,600 23,000 112.000 19,000 7,000 68,300 38,000 38,000 6,000 450,000 (34,000) 1,543,000 Note 6 Note 7 Note 2 Grants Mini-Grants General Purpose Challenge Grants Affiliation Mini-Grants Computer Grants Computer Loan Other Grants Total Grants 0 0 0 Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 0 129,296 195,200 (58,000) 1,065,278 1,065,278 129,296 $1,194,574 1,065,278 195,200 $1,260,478 1,065,278 (58,000) $1,007,278 Beginning Net Assets CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE Ending Net Assets dllndberblfsstaUfs01-021FS 12-31-01.xlsl-4 0 1,065,278 0 �CMF Tab 3 Page I Council of Michigan Foundations Strving granrmoke1s. Adwmcing giving. Date: February 8, 2002 Memo to: CMF Board of Trustees From: Herbert (Ted) D. Doan, Trustee Re: CMF 12-31-01 Investment Report Resolved: That the CMF Board of Trustees accept the December 31,2001 I nvestment Report. On a quarterly basis, the combined Investment Committee for the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF), Michigan Community Foundations' Venture (MCFV) and the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF), meet to review the investment performance for the operating and permanent endowment funds. The information contained in this section was reviewed by the Investment Comntittee on February 6, 2002. The enclosed Investment Report has been broken down into three sections. I nvestment Performance Report The benchmark is based on the targeted asset allocation formula listed below. S&P 500 S&P 400 S&P 600 lntemational Equities Short Bond Bond Cash 40% 10% 6% 14% 15% 15% 0% On November 19, 2001, the Investment Committee met with the current investment managers (Bank One and Comerica) to discuss the current 14% international equities asset allocation and options regarding an appropriate benchmark. After discussing the 14% international equity allocation with those managers, the committee decided to remain at the current allocation. This decision was primarily driven by the fact that 14% seems to be in the range of what other foundations are doing and after an extended period of negative returns in the international market this is typically when committees reallocate their investments, only to see the market turn around shortly thereafter. �2 During several meetings the committee has been discussing options for the appropriate benchmarks to use. In the past, the benchmark was based on the various indexes (S&P 500, 600, etc.). After discussing this issue with Bank One and Comerica, the committee decided a more appropriate benchmark would be comparing the CMF endowment funds to active investment manager returns. Comerica is now providing the Lipper returns for the following categories. Lipper Large Cap Core Lipper Mid Cap Core Lipper Small Cap Core Lipper International Lipper Corporate Debt A Rated Fixed Income Asset Allocation Report The Investment Committee has approved an asset allocation re-balancing policy that instructs the CMF VP of Finance to rebalance the endowment fund portfolios on a quarterly basis. To keep administrative time to a minimum CMF maintains one checking account to pay all endowment fund expenses. The negative cash balances are due to endowment fund expenditures from the CMF checking account, which are periodically reimbursed by transferring cash from the endowment funds back to CMF. Investment Performance Comparison Report One of the benchmarks the Investment Committee has been tracking is the Cambridge Associates, Inc. pool of colleges, universities, and foundations. Since the release of this quarterly report typically lags the end of our quarter, by two to three months, the latest comparative numbers available are September 30, 2001 . The variances from the Cambridge actual one-year rate of returns, are primarily due to the returns in the venture capital and private equity market, which are categories not allowed under our current investment policy. You will note that, over a three-year period, the endowment funds that have been fully-invested during this period track relatively close to the Cambridge pool. During the February 6, 2002 meeting the committee discussed an alternative investment product (fund of funds) that Vanguard will be rolling out in the next few months. The committee will be studying this product carefully to determine if this might be an appropriate diversification tool. S:\Boards and Commiltees\CMF\Board\200 I-0212.1 9.02MeetingMaterials\DRLinvstRptMemo 2- 19-02.doc �3 Council of Michigan Foundations Permanent Funds Investment Performance Report December 31 , 2001 One Year Actual Bench Return Mark Compound Annual Two Year Actual Bench Mark Return Three Year Actual Bench Return Mark William Allen Fund -5.55% -6.18% -3.47% -3.60% 2.03% 1.83% Mawby Endowment Funds -4.44% -6.18% -2.64% -3.60% 2.89% 1.83% Community Found Endowment -4.01 o/o .0.18% -2.17% -3.60% 3.14% 1.83% Johnson Educational Fund -4.19% -6.18% -1.84% -3.60% KYIP Fund -4.66% -6.18% -2.67% -3.60% MCFYP Endowment Fund N/A -6.18% N/A N/A Bench Made Is based on the targeted asset allocation using the Lipper returns for the following categories Lipper Large Cap Core Upper Mid Cap Core Upper Small Cap Core Lipper International Equity Lipper Corp. Debt A Rated Fixed Income Actual Returns Are net of investment management fees. dllndberg/Board/cmf/01-02/Brdrpt 2-19-02.xls-3 N/A 2.25% N/A 1.83% 1.83% N/A �4 Council of Michigan Foundations Asset Allocation December 31, 2001 Investment Balance 12/31/01 Actual Asset Allocation Targeted Asset Allocation Operating Funds CMF Operating Fund $3,893,962 100% 100% MCFYP Operating & Spoclal Projects $4,839,040 100% 100% $225,217 100% 100% Michigan AIDS Fund Note: All operabng funds are invested In money market accounts. Endowment Funds William Allen Endowment Fund Cash Equivalents Axed Income EquitieS $2.067 48,178 125.666 $175,911 1.2% 27 4% 714% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% Russell G. Mawby Endowment Fund to Improve & lnerease Philanthropy and Ruth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities s 0.4% 27.5% 72.1% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% ($7,168) 1,591,496 4,195.172 $5,779,500 -0.1% 27.5% 72 6% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% $6,672 247.110 645.552 $899,334 07% 27.5% 718% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% $103,646 3,154.565 8,293,099 $11,551,310 0.9% 273% 718% 1000% 0% 30% 70% 100% ($32,781) 317,768 745,247 $1 ,030.234 -03% 2.8% 6.5% 8.9% 0% 30% 70% 100% 8 ,143 606,001 1,587,251 $ 2,201,395 Community Foundation Endowment Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities Dorothy Johnson Educational Fund Cash Equivalents Axed Income Equllles KYIP Fund Cash Equ1valents Fixed Income Equiues MCFYP Endowment Fund Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities ~/01.()2/8ratlll2·1!1-02 aiS �5 Council of Michigan Foundations & Supporting Organizations Permanent funds Investment Performance Comparison Report 9/30101 Quaner Ending t-.30-lll Cambl1dge AdU;II Upper Foundation R~ !Median) Pool II One Year Ending 9-30-llt Actual Return Allen Fund ·967% ·951% -7.30% -15.63% t.Aawby Funds -9.02% ·951% -7.30% Community Foundation Fund -903% -951% -7.30% llppef (Median! Three Years Ending 9-30.01 Cambridge foundation Pool -1481% · 10 .80% · 13 60% ·14.81% · IOOO'l!o -951% -730% ·U.47% -1481% · 1000% ·951% ·730% · 14.82% ·14.81% ·1080% MCFYP E - 1 Fund NIA .g 51% N/A N./1< DAJ Fund was not fully Invested until July 2000. MCFYP Endowmenl was established In May 2001 Bench Mar-• -15g% LBAggregale CP~U -28 9% -288'11\ ·188% 130'l0 2.8% Note. Cambridge returns are based on a pool of 2n foundations, cclleges and universities Cambridge returns reporled are median numbers. I Assai Allocation Cambridge Pool us Equibu 40.1% 11 ,,. lnlemafO<W Equitios Fixed Income 27 6'11\ 3.8% 17.4% !000% Casn Oilier Total Real Eatate 32% Ventura Capital Pmlate Equity 2~ 1 5% 58% 08% Hedge Funds High Yield Bonds Oil & Partners/llpo a.. 0..% 0.7'11\ 24% 0.4% 17.4% Di-MCI SecuritieS Ar~~~noe Othor In- • Represents 11>e letesl return numbers available from Cambridge. acoounts fo< lhe dil!etenc. in lhe one year rell.mS. Cambridge notas lhel veniU<a alternative They also noted .,., ..... roiUm$ lend to be detayeGinCI aax IUm around In 1he next year. dllnelbe<glcommiiiB&'invesU20001Meel 2-6-021.•11· 1 Pool -14.24% -1144% . ,. 7 % ·18.8% 48'11 02% !~le<fan) 4 29% -945% S&PSOO Russel2500 fOl.llCiabOII ReiUm ·10.80% 0 Johnoon Edu<:aliOnal Fund Wilshire 6000 Upper ·1481% KYIP NIA Cambndgo Ac1ual CMF 56.0% 14.0% 300'4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 352% 7 OO"JJo 529% 352% 700% 635% 3sn 7 00'11. NIA 4 48% NIA 35~ 352% NIA 7 OO"JJo NIA �Attachment A CMF Proposed Dues Foundations 2/15/02 New Structure Old Structure 2001..02 Rates Categories Under $200,000 $ $200,000 - $1m $ $1-$2m $ $2-$5 $ Categories 150 360 780 900 $5-$10m $ 1,400 $10m-$25m $25m-$50m $ $ 2,500 4,500 $50-$100m $ 6,000 $100m-$250m $250m-$500m $ $ 8,000 12,000 $500m-$1b $1-$1 .Sb $1 .5-$2b $2-$5b $ $ $ $ 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 $5b+ $ 70,000 Number Of Members Under $500,000 $500,000 - $1m $1 -$2m $2-$4m $4-$6m $6-$8m $8-$10m $10-$20m $20-$40 $40-$60m $60-$80m $80-$100m $100-$200m $200-$400m $400-$600m $600-$800 S800-$1b $1-$2b $2-$3b $3-$4b $4b+ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ $ 1 $ 365 Delinquents Corporate Giving Public Donor Advised Comm Found Affiliates Comm Found Donor Aft. Out of State Total Members 46 35 2 37 5 4 494 78 39 38 58 27 20 14 33 14 9 5 4 14 7 2 21 Categories vs 15 on old schedule dlindberg/committee/strategic/Dues Structure.xls-sum 2003..()4 Rates 300 500 900 1,100 1,400 1,700 2,300 3,000 4,700 6,300 7,200 8,400 9,600 12,900 16,200 20,000 24,000 30,000 36,000 45,000 70,000 �Attachment B CMF Proposed Dues Corporate Giving Programs 217102 Old Structure Old Categories Paying Below Minimum $50,000-100,000 $100,000-250,000 5250,000-500,000 $500,000-1,250,000 $1 .25-2.5m $2.5-5m S5-15m S15-25m S25-50m S50-75m S75-100m l-250m :>".}Om+ Rates $ $ $ 780 900 1,400 $ 2,500 4,500 6,000 8,000 12,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 70,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ New Structure 2003..()4 Current Option for New #in Categories 20% Increase Category Annual Grants Paid Rates $ 900 6 $ 10 50,000-100,000 900 10 100,000-200,000 $ 1,100 3 200,000-300,000 1,400 $ 1,700 300,000-400,000 $ $ 400,000-500,000 2,300 4 500,000-1m $ 3,000 21m+ $ 4,700 35 lri order to be a member Corporate Giving Programs are required to have annual grants of at least $50,000 . dlindberg/committee/strategic/Dues Structure.xls-3 �Council of Michig an Foundations Member Services Projection 2002 to 2006 lilllliDd ldl1lllllldlll & :ZII~ IDCUiil:iiiiJ::iM Projei:ted 2002~3 2001~2 Ftevenlle$ Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Spending lnoome Endowment Funds Conference & Meetings Income Pubfocations & Library Services Other Income/COnsulting/Advertising Investment looome Total Revenues Pro9ramiAdmln Exponaos Wages OcaJpancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Fumlture COmputer -.sociation Dues oks & Subscriptions r'ubfications & Contracted Services Travel Training & Seminars COnference & Meetings Overhead allocation to Special projects Add to operating reserve Total Program/Admln Expenses Pro~t Net dllndberglbudgeU02~3/COfe $ 767,000 200,000 48,000 297,000 380.000 45,000 65.000 45,000 1,847,000 s 808,000 200,000 65,000 300,000 652,000 101,000 65.500 60,000 2.251,500 Projection 2005-06 2003.0. $ 2()().4..05 968,000 200,000 58,000 308,000 765.000 46 ,000 70,000 2,461,000 1,030,000 $1,089,000 200,000 200,000 5.000 5,000 315,000 322,000 770.000 775.000 102,000 47,000 14,000 16.000 75,000 75,000 2,511,000 2,529,000 1,084,860 62.805 49,862 12.837 70,125 51 ,984 10.503 25,674 147.465 23,870 7,426 115.000 41,375 67.898 6,365 680,000 (20,000) 72,950 2,511,000 $0 ~.000 918.000 47,000 37.200 9,900 53,400 40,000 9,100 24,000 129.500 19,500 7.000 68,300 38.000 38.000 6,000 450.000 (34.000) 984,000 59.200 47.000 12,100 66.100 49,000 9,900 24,200 139.000 22,500 7,000 110,500 39.000 64.000 6,000 641 ,000 (29,000) 1,860.900 2.251,500 1.033,200 60,976 48,41 0 12.463 68,083 50,470 10 ,197 24,926 143,170 23,175 7,210 76,000 40.170 65.920 6,180 675,000 (20.000) 135,450 2,461,000 ($13,900) $0 $0 5yr Projection - A.xls-summ s 1,139,103 64.689 51,358 13.222 72,229 53,544 10,818 26,444 t 51,889 24,586 7,649 77.000 42,616 69,935 6,556 690,000 (20.000) 47,361 2,529,000 $0 Total 2006~7 s 1,154.000 $ 200,000 5,000 330,000 780,000 103,000 18,000 75,000 2,665.000 5,049.000 1,000,000 138.000 1,575,000 3,742,000 399,000 159,500 355,000 12,417,500 1,196,058 66,630 52,899 13,619 74 ,396 55,150 11 .143 27,237 156,446 25,324 7,879 116,000 43,895 72,033 6,753 700,000 (20.000) 59,540 2.665,000 5,437,221 314.301 249,529 64,241 350,934 260,H8 52.560 128,481 737,970 119.456 37,164 494.500 207,056 339.785 31,855 3,386,000 (109,000) 315,300 12,417,500 $0 $0 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2002_BB_2002-02-19_Financials Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book financials Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book financials. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50452 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002-02-19 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/1f4bb6b814b6ae75aafd0e4af9907be9.pdf 0fd0b73e65675931df478a7218dcc64f PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Found-ations Tab 8 Page I S<'rving grantmokets. Advanclng giving. February 7, 2002 Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chainnan, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Libby Maynard and David Kennedy, Co-Chairs, Government Relations Committee Re: Government Relations Committee Report Annual Capitol Hill Visit I am pleased to report that 19 staff and trustees from 13 CMF members joined with CMF stafffor the Annual Capitol Hill Visit on January 29 and 30. In spite of the State of the Union Speech, a House Republican Retreat, and Senate Democratic Policy Seminar, we were successful in meeting personally with nine Congressional Members and both Senators as well as the staff from the other seven Members. Our thanks to CMF Trustee Martin Taylor and DTE Energy for again hosting the Capitol Hill Dinner. The two legislative priorities we discussed included the IRA Charitable Rollover and Simplification ofthe Excise Tax on Private Foundations to One Percent. Both of these priorities were passed by the House as part of HR 7 ands are included in a Senate Bill that should be introduced shortly by Senators Liebennan and Santorum. President Bush has also included these priorities in his Budget. These two priorities are supported by the Members of Michigan's Congressional delegation. Senators Levin and Stabenow indicated they would let their colleagues know about the importance of the new Senate Bill. The two priorities are summarized in the attached issues sheets. In addition, each Member was provided with a packet, including a listing of the foundations in their Districts, schools in their Districts using the Learning to Give lesson plans, and fact sheets on both the Tobacco Settlement Partnership and Michigan IDA Partnership. State Bi-Partisan Philanthropy Caucus The attached one page draft has been prepared to sununarize the value of creating a State Bi-Partisan Philanthropy Caucus. Our consultant David Haynes of Public Affairs Associates has approved this draft. He has identified Senator Bob Emerson from Flint, Senator Ken Sikkema from Grandville, Representative Marc Shulman from West Bloomfield and Representative Bill McConico from Detroit as the potential Caucus leaders. Rob Collier is now meeting with these four individuals as well as Speaker Johnson and Senate Majority Leader DeGrow to discuss the concept and the goal of having the first meeting in May before the election season enters high gear. �2 Government Relations Committee Report January 7, 2002 CMF's Public Policy Committee Co-Chairs Dave Egner from the Hudson-Weber Foundation, Karla Hall from DTE Energy and Susan Broman from Steelcase, convened the first in-person meeting of the Public Policy C01mnittee on January 18. The Committee has identified five issues for further research and consideration by the Annual Conference Program Committee as session topics: TANF Reauthorization, Safety Net, K-12 Education, Access to Health Care, and Land-Use. In addition, Pat Babcock from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation has volunteered to a..'>sist the Committee in developing a Public Policy I 01 Educational Campaign to help staff and trustees of Michigan foundations better understand the importance of public policy to philanthropy. This Educational Campaign could include: articles in The Michigan Scene and Memo to Members as well as special workshops. Public Policy and Charitable Giving Elan Garonzik from the Mott Foundation, Charles Janssen from the Capital Region Community Foundation, and Pat Babcock from the W.K Kellogg Foundation joined Rob in presenting an Issues in Brief Session with the M ichigan Public Policy Institute, on December 3, for 40 legislative staff members at the Capitol. The Session covered grantmaking priorities and patterns as well as experiences working with government to serve Michigan communities. Annual Giving and Volunteering Report Rob Collier participated in a news conference on November 15, National Philanthropy Day, with Sam Singh from the Michigan Nonprofit Association, Kyle Caldwell from the Michigan Community Services Commission and Professor Mark Wilson from Michigan State University to discuss the preliminary findings from the Annual Giving and Volunteering Survey conducted in September and October 2001. The Survey confirms that almost 90% of Michigan adults made a charitable contribution during the past year and that 63% of Michigan residents plan to give the same amount in 2002. CMF is co-sponsoring printing of the full report scheduled for distribution to the Legislature and public in March. �Excise Tax on Private Foundations Position. The Council of Michigan Foundations joins the Council on Foundations in supporting simplification to one percent of the excise tax on private foundation investment income. Background. Private foundations generally are subject to a 2 percent excise tax on their net investment income. The tax is 1 percent in any year in which the foundation's percentage of distributions for charitable purposes generally exceeds the average percentage of its distributions over the five preceding taxable years. Private non-operating foundations generally must make annual distributions for charitable purposes equal to roughly 5 percent of the fair market value of the foundation's endowment assets. The excise tax paid-$500 million in 1999-acts as a credit in reducing the 5 percent requirement. Because the tax paid qualifies as a credit toward the minimum distribution, it is estimated that simplifying the tax would automatically result in an additional $200 plus million in qualifying distributions per year, about 90 percent of which typically go to grants, according to IRS estimates. The revenue raised by simplifying the tax would still more than cover its intended purpose: to cover costs of IRS oversight of exempt organizations. The fiscal 2001 budget of the Service's exempt-organization division is $58 million. Under the current two-tiered structure, a foundation is penalized for making a substantial increase in its charitable spending. Many foundations set spending policies of 5 percent to 6 percent to preserve the long-term value of their endowments. A significant increase in one year (while making them eligible for the 1 percent rate for that year) will increase thei r five-year average spending percentage to a level they are not willing to maintain. As a result, for the next five years, their tax rate doubles to 2 percent. The Joint Committee on Taxation staff has recommended repeal of the tax. In an April 2001 report ("Study of the Overall State of the Federal Tax System and Recommendations for Simplification ," JCS-3-01, Volume 2, pp. 456-459), the JCT concluded that the tax should be eliminated because of its complexity. Repeal, the report noted, "would relieve private foundations of having to make the necessary calculations of net investment income, file estimated tax returns, and consider the optimal level of charitable activity in terms of the rate of tax." Status. While both the House and Senate have introduced bills to repeal the excise tax, H.R. 7, the Community Solutions Act, which passed the House in 2001, provides for simplification and reduction of the excise tax to one percent. Senators Santorum (R-PA) and Lieberman are considering this provision as part of a new charitable giving bill. The Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated the total cost of this change at $2.17 billion over 10 years. �IRA Charitable Rollover Position. The Council of Michigan Foundations joins the Council on Foundations supporting legislation that would allow taxpayers to make contributions directly to charity from their IRA and other tax-deferred retirement assets without incurring tax liability. Background. Because of the stock market boom of the 1990s, many Americans have unexpectedly large Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), some in seven figures. Many taxpayers have growing interest in giving IRA assets to community foundations, private foundations, local charities, or creating deferred gifts such as charitable remainder trusts that later benefit charitable organizations. Under current law, any tax-deferred distribution is fully taxable as income. For donors interested in relatively small charitable contributions, the tax effect should be no problem-the IRA disbursement comes out and is added to the donor's taxable income but is then deducted from income when the gift is made. But two barriers in the tax code can thwart (or penalize) a donor making large gifts: Percentage Limitations: In any year, donors may not deduct more than 50 percent of their income for gifts of cash to public charities (30 percent if to private foundations). Three-percent Floor: Higher income taxpayers may run into a provision that reduces their itemized deductions by up to 3 percent, subject to an overall limit that deductions cannot be reduced below 80 percent of the original amount. A large gift from an IRA can increase a taxpayer's income to the point where this 3 percent reduction applies. Legislative History. In 2001, Representative Phil Crane (R-IL) and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) introduced companion bills (H.R. 774 and S. 205 respectively) that would allow IRA owners over age 59~ to make tax-free distributions directly to a qualified charity or a qualifying deferred giving plan, such as a charitable remainder trust, pooled income fund or charitable gift annuity. President Bush has indicated his continuing support of this provision. Current Status. A version of these bills was included in H.R. 7, the Community Solutions Act, which passed the House in July 2001. H.R. 7 would allow both outright and deferred gifts, beginning at age 70 ~. The Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated the total cost of this version at $2.75 billion over ten years. IRA Charitable Rollover was also i.ncluded in S. 592, the Savings Opportunity and Charitable Giving Act of 2001, sponsored by Senators Santorum (R-PA) and Lieberman (O-CT). The Senate has not acted on this proposal. �DRAFT A Bi-Partisan State Legislative Philanthropy Caucus Despite the continued growth of charitable foundations in Michigan, organized giving is being challenged by issues, such as: • corporate mergers, • increased sale of family owned businesses, • growing geographic dispersion of family members around the U.S., • for-profit firms, such as Fidel ity, now distributing grantmaking assets, and • unfamiliarity and hence unrealistic expectations on the part of new policymakers. A State Legislative Philanthropy Caucus could help to address these issues by: • helping to inform colleagues about the roles that foundations play, • hosting periodic briefings on foundations for state officials, • suppm1ing periodic meetings for foundations on state issues, and • working with the Council ofMichigan Foundations on efforts to promote and increase philanthropy in Michigan. Since 1973 the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) has worked to increase, improve and enhance philanthropy in Michigan. With more than 490 independent, family community and corporate foundations and giving programs as members, CMF is the largest regional association of grantmakers in the U.S. CMF has worked closely with the State Legislatw·e and Governor since the late 1980s on projects such as the Exon Energy Settlement, the Michigan AIDS Fund, the Michigan IDA Partnership, the Tobacco Settlement Partnership, and the growth of community foundations to serve every county. The growth of community foundations has been aided by the permanent State Community Foundation Tax Credit for individuals, families and corporations paying the Single Business Taxthe first such tax credits in the country. Michigan ranks fourth in the nation in terms of organized philanthropy. More than 1,800 foundations and giving programs have assets that exceed $22 billion and annual grants toping $1.2 billion. These foundations are vital partners to the 16,000 plus charitable nonprofit organizations that employ more than 300,000 Michigan residents. Because fifty percent ofthese assets are held by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, C.S. Mott Foundation and Kresge Foundation- that have national and international grantmaking programs, the vast majority of these are small family foundations with assets of less than one million dollars each. T he creation of foundations will likely continue, due in part to the largest intergenerational transfer of wealth ever now underway, and a legislative and regulatory climate that encourages giving. A State Philanthropy Caucus can play a leadership role in insuring that this is the case. For further information contact Rob Collier, President CMF, at 616-842-7080. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2002_BB_2002-02-19_Government-Relations-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book government relations committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book government relations committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50453 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002-02-19 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6abaecae6ecd81172be997bf3420e540.pdf 426770fe798a09523fecf9772f850a5e PDF Text Text CMF Council of M ich igan Foundations: Tab 9 Page 1 ~rving grantmllktts. Advancing giving. Date: February 7, 2002 To: Council of Michigan Foundations Board of Trustees From: Russell G. Mawby, Chair, Learning to Give C. David Campbell, Steering Committee Member RobertS. Collier, Steering Committee Member Julie F. Cummings, Steering Committee Member Dorothy A. Johnson, Steering Committee Member Re: February 2002 Learning to Give Update The Learning to Give (LTG) initiative continues to enjoy success and rapid development on many fronts. Steady requests for information and assistance in bringing LTG to local communities are now being received. The Steering Committee meets again in early May. A summary of the progress follows. Financial Support Grants Received Michigan Community Service Commission $27,000 Renewable To support a Learning to Give consultant at the Muskegon Area Intermediate School District (MAISD). Goal: to involve every child in every school in Muskegon County in service-learning and LTG each year over three years. Also, to model how an lSD can integrate LTG and servicelearning into their core technical assistance to school districts. Muskegon Rotary Club $ 5,000 Renewable A companion grant in support of a Learning to Give consultant at the MAISD. This is our first support from a local Rotary Club. Rotary International has told us we will need to be: 1) supported by local Rotary Clubs and 2) international in reach, before they would consider sponsorship support. This grant is step one. Community Foundation for Muskegon County All Renewable $10,000 Youth Advisory Committee $ 5,000 Women and Children's Fund $12,000 Unrestricted Fund Companion grants to the MAISD partnership. Of particular note is the gift from the Youth Advisory Committee that pays for classroom teachers to teach philanthropy to students in the county! (This makes us smile!). Muskegon Area Intermediate School District lnkind The MAISD has committed substantial inkind support to the Muskegon partnership, including: an office, telephone, and all equipment; training �2 space; marketing of teacher professional development opportunities; and long-term planning to include technical support for LTG in the core services of the District at the end of the three year development effort. In addition, they have offered to open a door to their colleagues in other IS D's regarding the success of this model. Michigan Women's Foundation $5,000 Renewable A mini-grant to support the development of units and teaching materials that describe how women, over time, have used the nonprofit sector as an alternative power structure in American society. Lilly Endowment $24,000 (Metropolitan School District of Warren Township) Warren Public Schools, suburban Indianapolis, has written LTG into their school improvement plan- funded as part of a major education initiative of the Lilly Endowment. We expect to begin work there in the fall of 2002. Federal Funds As a result of CMF's efforts on behalf of LTG the new federal education bill includes the word "giving" under the definition of Character Education. These funds will be available to the states as "block grants". We are working to determine a state by state strategy to access the Character Education funds for Learning to Give in each of our projected partner states. Rob Collier has met with the Department of Education in order to determine the next steps. A federal Request for Proposals will be sent to state departments of education in March for an April reply. Target states are: Michigan, California, Indiana, Texas, and Ohio. There is some possibility to access technical assistance funds. This is also being pursued with a brief concept paper regarding how LTG might assist Character Education programs in teaching "giving". Other Grants The Atlantic Philanthropies-application has been submitted, we are waiting for a decision. The Corporation for National Service has been approached by Dottie Johnson regarding a potential demonstration project on how LTG can support the goals of the new Freedom Corps. This is a very preliminary conversation at this time. A template for funding proposals to potential partners in each of the target states is completed. In addition a template has been developed to use in cities or regions that approach us regarding bringing LTG to their schools. These proposals will be sent to foundations that have contacted us from Kansas City, St. Louis, Appleton, and northern Indiana. �3 A second gift from Barclay Palmer, individual donor, is expected for $25,000 to support the LTG partnership with the Center for Partnership Studies-an educational group working to develop editing tools around language and equity. Michigan Community Service Commission- Pending $27,000 to support the development of performing arts lessons that include service-learning and teach Learning to Give lessons is in the final approval stages. This effort is in partnership with Grand Valley State University and Muskegon Community College. Pre-proposal discussions are underway with the A.T. and T. Foundation, the Fremont Area Community Foundation, and the Ford Foundation. Other options are also under consideration. The Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan is working with LTG on a model to bring LTG to Chelsea Public Schools and to integrate the Chelsea Fund youth advisory committee tasks into this model. This will be the first model that brings the YAC of a community foundation and LTG directly together. Grants Ending Three -year grants that were completed December 31 , 2001 are: • The McGregor Fund • The Atlantic Philanthropies • The Ford Foundation • The Lilly Endowment (first grant) National Content Advisory Committee (NCAC) The NCAC met in October at The Fetzer Institute's "Seasons" Retreat to review the LTG Themes. A solid discussion resulted in agreements to strengthen the volunteer component of the themes; to develop government service as an important sub-component; and participants agreed to areas where they might assist LTG through the writing of scholarly papers or making presentations. Dr. Robert Bremner, Ohio State University, has already submitted his paper for our review and use. The group meets again in October 2002. Standardized Tests Test questions for standardized tests at grades 5, 8, and 11 have been completed and reviewed by the Fairness Committee. We are pushing to put the questions, and sample tests, on the Web by late spring. Units and Lessons Editing, fairness review, field-testing, and placement on the web continues for the lessons. A total of 338 lessons are on the Web-site. One hundred and twenty more will be added over the next few months. A number of the units written during the summer of 2001 deal with issues of tolerance and diversity. These �4 units have become especially important following the September attacks on the United States. They were reviewed for fairness in January and will go on the Web this spring. A Muslim representative has volunteered to serve on the Fairness Committee, rounding out our cultural representation. Field-Testing Of the 338 lesson plans currently on the Web, 108 have completed their field-test reviews. That means that they have been taught and formally evaluated, in writing, by at least five classroom teachers and are considered completed. Pilot Schools The thirty pilot school buildings help to develop the standardized tests, and to begin to measure outcomes. Our special thanks to Gerald Smith, and to the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan and I.U. intern, Colleen Peters, for helping in recruiting a Detroit Public Schools cluster to participate in the pilot program. The school districts involved provided at the end of this report. Initial Evaluation Data While this period has been one of collecting data, rather than reporting, some preliminary numbers from teachers who piloted lessons in the fall of 2001 have been extremely positive. By June, teachers from all thirty schools will be reporting. Number of K-12 school students included: 2,621 from 12 schools Mastered+ (grade A equivalent)= 1,439 students Mastered= (grade B equivalent)= 808 students Adequate (grade C equivalent)= 300 students Partial (grade D equivalent)= 75 students 86% of the students involved in these pilot schools completely mastered or exceeded the philanthropy education objectives. 98% of the students adequately mastered or exceeded the philanthropy education objectives. Tea c her Professional Development Summer institutes for new Teacher-Consultants are planned for: Michigan Ohio Michigan June 24-27, 2002 June 19-21 , 2002 July 29-August 3 Muskegon Area Intermediate School District Case Western Reserve University Philanthropy Through the Arts Muskegon Community College In addition, a youth coalition in New Hampshire has scheduled in-service days for LTG on March 151h and June 251h. They are using New Venture funds from the New Hampshire Charitable Trust to brinQI LTG to their area. �5 Staff In-service Workshops Teachers at each of the thirty pilot schools have participated in in-service workshops. Approximately, 212 active pilot teachers have been involved in these in-service experiences. Congressional District Coverage In preparing packets for the CMF visits to Congress, LTG was pleased to note that there are now a number of teachers using the LTG lessons in every Congressional District in Michigan. Ferris State University Masters Degree in Education with a Concentration in Philanthropic Studies The new 36-hour Masters Degree in Education with a concentration in philanthropic studies is in the final approval process. Thirteen hours will be provided as online courses by Ferris State University. Six hours will be provided online in partnership with the Indiana Center on Philanthropy. Twelve hours will be provided by Learning to Give in two summer residential seminars. In addition, six hours will be provided in philanthropy online from Learning to Give. Ferris State University will purchase the LTG sponsored components, providing a small funding stream to LTG. In addition to the Masters Degree, Ferris is also offering two certificate programs-one for teachers who already hold Masters Degrees and one for program officers of foundations and/or youth workers. If approved by the Ferris State University Board this spring, the first online Education courses will be available in the summer of 2002. The first residential seminar will be offered in Grand Rapids by LTG, July 28-August 61h. Web-site and Teacher Materials Web-Site A change in the leadership at Michigan State Universities' Department of Computers and Technology occurred over the holiday. We have met with the new Director. MSU has expressed interest in providing a formal proposal for the revision of the Web-site. These revisions will depend upon further funding. High School Textbook Supplement, Teacher Guide, Student Guide The Indiana University Center on Philanthropy has offered to write the high school textbook supplement, CD-ROM and student/teacher guides for the $100,000 grant provided by the Charles Stewart Matt Foundation. Their inkind contributions will make up the matching portion. Work on the textbook has begun. We are meeting with a potentia1 l e-publisher in mid-February. Royalties from the textbook supplements may be another small earned income revenue stream. Briefing Papers Twenty new briefing papers have been added to the Web-site in January. Bringing the total to 48. Thanks to I.U. Center on Philanthropy, and graduate �6 students from the Mandel Center at Case Western Reserve for their continued writing and donation of the briefing papers. LTG Video Interview with Harold Bloom LTG has scheduled an interview in March, and has permission to video-tape, Harold Bloom in New York discussing the relationship of LTG content to Shakespeare. This is the next step in moving the content into English language arts. Marketing and Public Relations Meeting with Tom Watkins, Michigan Superintendent of Schools LTG representatives met with Tom Watkins and his staff to discuss support from the Michigan Department of Education for Learning to Give and service-learning. Among the discussion items was the suggestion for a formal resolution of support from the Michigan Board of Education and to pursue the Character Education funds for LTG in Michigan. Newsletter and Publications/Television Coverage The fall newsletter was distributed to almost 10,000 individuals nationwide. The LTG introductory brochure was updated and reprinted. The 2002 Summer Institute brochures for Michigan and Ohio have been updated and printed, as well as preliminary materials for the Ferris Masters and the summer arts institute. Mary Petro's first grade class at Open School, Albion Public Schools, was featured on Kalamazoo Television at the holidays. They were making out "charity checks" to local nonprofit organizations after having researched the local charities as a part of their LTG lesson. McGregor Foundation Sponsored Family Involvement Booklets Booklets advising on strategies for family involvement in education have been written for: 1) program officers of foundations; 2) parents; and 3) educators. These three companion publications will be printed and ready for distribution by our May meeting. They will be used as the basis for continued in-service experiences in our Detroit area, and other school districts. Our consultant, Dr. Amy Colton, is currently involved in consulting work with the Michigan Department of Education and is using her research for Learning to Give as a part of the background material for the Michigan State Board's parent involvement initiative. Potential PBS Partnership Initial conversations have begun regarding a potential partnership between Learning to Give and public broadcasting. PBS is interested in high quality civil society content-particularly in children's programming. LTG could benefit from the national and grass-roots media "reach" of PBS. �7 Conference Presentations Since our last meeting the following presentations have been made regarding Learning to Give: National Association of State Charitable Officials Annual Conference, New Hampshire School Superintendents Michigan Association of School Boards Michigan Fire-Up Student Teacher Conference Council of Michigan Foundations Annual Meeting Independent Sector Annual Conference Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals National Council for Social Studies 81 5 t Annual Conference • Philanthropy Education, Giving for the Common Good Plenary Speaker-Dan Moore, W.K. Kellogg Foundation • Learning to Give: the Three Ts- Time, Talent Treasure for the Common Good Panel Discussion- Kathy Agard, Moderator Esther Silver-Parker, President, AT&T Foundation A'Lelia Bundles, author and ABC News Producer Sarah Melendez, President, INDEPENDENT SECTOR • Teacher Presentations Elementary- Geography Title: Your Land, My Land, Woody (Guthrie's) Land, Too! Teacher: Lynn Chamberflain, Munising Central Elementary School, Elementary-History Title: Underground Railroad-People Get Ready... There's a Train a Comin' Teacher: Ramona Purdy, VanZile Elementary, Detroit Public Schools Middle School-Economics Title: Connecting Economics, Core Democratic Values and the Nonprofit Sector Teacher(s): Cheryl Larkin, Dolan Middle School, Tom Webb, Fulton Middle School High School-Social Studies Title: Teach Our Children Well-Civic Responsibility, Volunteers and Learning to Give Teacher(s): Kathleen Ling, Mt. Pleasant High School Cindy, Miles, Mt. Pleasant High School Christine Knapp, Mt. Pleasant High School Administrative/Management Issues LTG hired a new Executive Assistant to replace Marla. Diane Cottrell started January 7, 2002. She comes to us from Muskegon County government where she was the Executive Assistant to the airport manager. �8 Pilot School Districts Elementary: Middle: Saugatuck Public Schools (Douglas Elementary) Onekama Consolidated Schools Holland Public Schools (Maplewood Elementary) Mona Shores Public Schools (Three buildings)* Reeths-Puffer Public Schools Albion Public Schools (Two buildings) Romulus Community Schools (Six buildings-all) Saginaw City School District (Two buildings) Muskegon Catholic Central Schools (Two buildings)* (St. Michael's Elementary) Detroit Public Schools (Four buildings: three as a part of the Central High School cluster)* (Van Zile Elementary) Zeeland Public Schools (Cityside Middle School) St. Charles Public Schools (Thurston Middle School) Mona Shores Public Schools* Holland Charter School (Black River Middle School) Muskegon Catholic Central Schools* Detroit Public Schools* (Longfellow Middle School) High School: Mona Shores Public Schools* Black River Charter School (Holland) Muskegon Catholic Central' Central High School (Detroit Public Schools)* *These are K-12 school districts/or the Detroit cluster K-12 committed to teaching Learning to Give in all buildings at each grade level in the district for at least three years. There are more elementary school buildings because middle and high school teachers interact with more students than elementary teachers. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2002_BB_2002-02-19_Learning-to-Give Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book Learning to Give Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book Learning to Give. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50454 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002-02-19 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e1ece95d5ec9e9597f40b11bc6296638.pdf 1cd412c6d3e608be6b4aa70b330e1401 PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Tab 5 Attachment C Page 1 Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. February 8, 2002 Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chairman, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rob Collier, President Re: Membership D ues Increase T he following resolution is presented for your review and action at the Februaty 19, 2002 Board Meeting. As noted below, it has been reviewed and approved for presentation to the full Board by both the Executive Conm1ittee and Audit & F inance Committee. RESOLVED that the membership dues structure be adjusted for the fiscal year starting Aprilt, 2003 in accordance with the following steps as reviewed and approved by the Audit & Finance and Executive Committees: • • • • • • Increase asset categories for foundations from 15 to 21 , Increase dues by 20%, Establish a minimum dues of $300 for the asset category of less than $500,000, Increase community foundation affiliate rate to $300 as well, E sta blish dues of $500 for the asset category of $500,000 to $1,000,000, Adjust Corporate Giving Programs categories, based on grants paid, to match foundation categories, which a re based on asset levels, using a 5% payout. Background The need for a dues increase has been examined by the Membership Committee and the Audit & Finance Committee, as part ofthe Strategic P lanning Process. Below is a brief summary of the process that took place in arriving at the proposed dues adjustments, which are recommended to go into effect in 2003-04. In developing the proposed revision to the dues structure, management focused on the following ISSUes: • • • • A structure that is fair and equitable for all members. A structure which keeps pace with inflation, based on anticipated investment growth of existing members' assets. Sufficient revenue to support priority services identified by members and not require special fundraising annually to support ongoing services. Building a reserve sufficient to cover six months worth of operating expenses. In projecting dues revenues for 2003-04, a loss of 40 members (or $50,000 per year) is projected due to the recommended increase. In addition a loss of 50 members, that are at least two years delinquent on dues, is planned. �2 I. September 28, 2001 The Membership Committee met to discuss issues involving membership over the next 3-5 years . During this meeting the committee discussed the anticipated need to increase dues in the coming year by examining several items: • 5-year budget projection • Membership categories & criteria • Membership retention • Membership development • Membership dues h1 discussing the membership dues issue, several items were examined in detail: • Last dues increase was in 1995 • mflation over the last six years • mcrease in member benefits since 1995 • Responses to 2001 member survey • Cost to provide minimum services to members is $500 annually • Comparison ofCMF dues structure with other Regional Associations and COF • Preliminary five-year core services financial projection • Different dues restructuring scenarios Recommendations from 9-28-01 meeting: • Delay dues increase until fiscal year 2 003-04 • mcrease minimum dues to $500/annually • Expand dues categories • Review specific dues increase and expanded categories with the Audit & Finance Committee • Look at cost-containment measures ll. October 2, 2001 The Board of Trustees endorsed the recommendations of the Membership Cormnittee. III. October 26, 2001 The Audit & Finance Committee reviewed the preliminary Core Services five-year projection. IV. November 28,2001 The Audit & Finance committee discussed the following issues: • Five-year projection • Core services cost cutting measures • Minimum dues categories • Revised dues structure • Group rates • Rates for fees for services • Other potential revenue generation ideas S:\ Bourds and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2. 19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLMembshpDuesMemo 2-19-02-b.doc �3 Recommendations from the 11-28-01 meeting: Minimum dues: • $150 category would be raised to $360 for fiscal year 2002-03 • In 2003-04 the increase in the $150 category would be completed by raising this group from $360 to $500 • Foundations currently in the $360 category would be raised to $500 for fiscal year 2002-03 Revised dues structure: • Look at expanding the current number of fifteen categories • Present management recommendations for the January 17, 2002 budget meeting on a dues increase for 2003-04 Group Rates: • Eliminate group rates Fees for Services: • Base on actual staff salaries and benefits, plus a profit margin and overhead rate, taking into account what for-profit firms charge Management's Recommended Plan Based on the input received from the various committees and Board of Trustees' involvement in the Strategic Planning Process, management is proposing the following adjustments to the current dues structure: Minimum Asset Categories • No increases for 2002-03 Old Catetw rv Under $200,000 $200,000 to $1 million • • Rate- 2002-03 $1 50 $360 New Cate1!0rv Under $500,000 $500,000 to $ 1 million Rate 2003-04 $300 $500 Keep the under $500,000 category at $300 to match the rate being offered by the Association of Small Foundations. Currently there are 78 members in this category. Raise the $500,000 to $1 million category to $500. Currently there are 39 members in this category. Dues Increase and Expanding Categories • Implement a 20% dues increase for all categories greater than $500 and less than $70,000 for 2003-04, which would generate an additional $188,370 annually. • A prime reason for the proposed increase is that the accumulated inflation factor over the past six years has totaled 18%-20%. • The proposed increase should allow CMF to meet its goal of an annual break-even budget while at the same time keeping dues constant for the next 4 years. • Expanding the categories from 15 to 2 1 will assist in keeping dues current with the anticipated annual growth in inflation. This is based on a projected investment growth of our members' assets (see following page). S:\ Bourds and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLMembshpDuesMemo 2-19-02-b.doc �4 Projected Members' Asset Growth 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Year 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 (8%) 0% 5% 5% 8% Total Dues Existing Members $976,000 1,044,000 1,103,000 1'168,000 %Growth from Previous Year 6.9% 5.6% 5.8% Community Foundation Affiliate Membership Starting in 2002-03 only affiliates that participated in the Kellogg Youth Challenge are eligible for separate membership status. Affiliates currently pay annual dues of$150. Those who do not qualify for separate membership will have their assets rolled into the total assets of the lead foundation for calculating dues. Affiliate membership will increase from $150 to $300 starting in 2003-04. The lead foundation can pay these dues as a grant expense from the Youth Endowment Fund. Corporate Giving Programs Corporate Giving Program dues are based on the level of grantmaking. Dues categories have been revised to correspond to the proposed rates for foundations, based on a 5% spending policy. An example is that the $1 - $2 million asset category for foundations would equal the $50,000 $100,000 grants category for corporate giving programs. It is recommended that the top category be capped at $1 million + in grants. There are currently eight categories of $2.5 million and greater, with no corporate giving program members falling in this range. V. January 17,2002 Audit & Finance Committee approved the 2002-03 Budget and the proposed revision to the membership dues as highlighted above. VI. January 22, 2002 Executive Committee approved the 2002-03 Budget and the proposed revision to the membership dues as highlighted above starting with the 2003-04 Fiscal Year. S:\ Bourds and Committees\CMF\Board\200 I-02\2.19.02MeetingMaterials\DRLMembshpDuesMemo 2-19-02-b.doc � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2002_BB_2002-02-19_Membership-Dues Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book membership dues Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2002-02-19 board book membership dues. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50455 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002-02-19