<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=145&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-04-28T05:58:55-04:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>145</pageNumber>
      <perPage>24</perPage>
      <totalResults>26018</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="54700" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58971">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/df2cb1ac38ec0d3bbe78ba9258946db2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2ddd483c73d1cc874c7fbe1f4c66c6fd</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008311">
                    <text>�A Final Report Upon
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Gaylord, Michigan

Prepared for the
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AND THE CITY COUNCIL

The preparation of this report was financially aided
through a Federal grant from the Urban Renewal Administration of the Department of Housing and Urban Development under the Urban Planning Assistance Program
authorized by Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954,
as amended, administered by the Michigan Department
of Commerce.

By
Harland Bartholomew and Associates
Planners, Engineers and Landscape Architects
Saint Louis, Missouri

May, 1966

�'
'
'•
•
"-

HARLAND BARTHOLOMEW AND ASSOCIATES
PLANNER~

f:NGINEERS · LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

1030

PIERCE

BUILDING

112 NORTH FOURTH STREET

SAINT LOUIS
GARFIELD

1·2107

2,

CABLE

MISSOURI
ADL'ftUS

HARPLAN

May, 1966
City Planning Commission
and City Council
Gaylord, Michigan
Gentlemen:
In accordance with our agreement, we are pleased to submit this final report on the Comprehensive Plan for the City
of Gaylord.

~ ·

The plan calls attention to the many opportunities of
Gaylord and provides an agreed upon program of community action essential to the implementation of the plan. This report contains all of the supporting data, information, and
maps as amended or modified, that have been presented in previous reports and meetings.
In the coming years, the plan must be kept up to date
with appropriate revisions and periodic re-evaluation so that
it may be closely related to the changing conditions in the
community. This report, once adopted as the plan for Gaylord,
will mark the beginning of a continuous planning program directed toward improving the community while creating the best
possible environment for its residents.
The preparation of this plan has been a most interesting
and challenging endeavor. Our association with the city, its
officials, and residents has been an enjoyable experience. We
would like to express our appreciation to the many people who
have generously contributed their time and effort to the development of the plan.
Respectfully submitted,

HA7~J::;

I
I
I
I

By

ST. LOUIS

ATLANTA

Malcolm C. Drummond
Associate Partner

MEMPHIS

WASHINGTON

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

. . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . ..
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY • • • • • • • • • • . •
Historical Background • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .
Geographic Location • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .
Economic Background • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .

3
3
5
5

LAND USE PLAN • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
Existing Land Use Pattern • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Dwelling Unit Distribution • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Future Land Use Needs • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Land Use Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

11
11
15
15
16

THOROUGHFARE PLAN. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Present Street System • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Traffic Patterns • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Proposed Thoroughfare Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • •

21
21
23
24

THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Land Use Pattern. •
• •••••••••••••
Street Pattern • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Parking Facilities • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Development Plan for the Business District • • • • •

27
27
28
29
33

INTRODUCTION. •

I
I
I

1

. .. . .. . . .
. ... .

• 37
COMMUNITY FACILITIES • • • • • • • •
• 37
Existing Community Facilities • •
. .
Community Facilities Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40

. .

REGULATORY MEASURES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 45
Zoning Regulations. • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • 45
Subdivision Regulations • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 50

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .• .•

. .

PUBLIC UTILITIES • • • • • •
Existing Facilities • • • •
Future Requirements • • • •

• 53
• 53
• 55

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Present Municipal Finances • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Proposed Capital Improvement Program • • • • • • • •
Cost of the Program • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

57
57
64
69

PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Coordination of Public Improvements • • • • • • • • •
Guidance of Private Development • • • • • • • • • • •
Public Understanding and Support • • • • • • • • • •
Planning Commission Program • • • • • • • • • • • • •
City Council Program • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Planning Commission Policies and Procedures • • • • •

71
72
73
74
75
76
77

�INDEX TO PLATES
Plate
1
2
3
4
5
6

7
8
9

••

10

Land Use - 1965. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Distribution of Dwelling Units - 1965 and 1985.
Land Use Plan - 1985 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Traffic Flow - 1965 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Major Street Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
General Standards for Major Thoroughfares • • • •
Business District Plan • • • ~ • • • • • • • • •
Community Facilities Plan • • • • • • • • • • • •
Zoning District Map • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Areas Served by Sewer and Water Systems • • • • •

11
15
16
23
25
25
33
40
48
55

-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

INDEX TO TABLES
Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11
12
13
14

Economic Characteristics. • • • • • • • • • • •
Population Trends and Projections. • • • • •
Existing Land Use in Gaylord • • • • • • • • • •
Land Use and Population Ratios • • • • • • • • •
Future Land Use Requirements. • • • •
• ••
Existing Major Street Data • • • • • • • • • • •
Percentage of Vehicles Parking by Time Periods.
Existing and Proposed Community Facilities • • .
Municipal Revenues • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Municipal Expenditures • • • • • • • • •
• •
Trends in Assessed Values • • • • • • • . • • • •
Estimated Bonding Limits • • • • • • • • • • • •
Trends in Tax Rates • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Proposed Six-Year Capital Improvement Program • •

4
8
12
14
19
22
30
43
58
59
61
62
63
68

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

r

GAYLOR.D

I
C.
~

0

z.

"'

-.....J

I
I
I

us

-~

GE

II

•

t1

c;~N

1=-

G~A HIC

,...,.,.c.
l'.\lY
u o~ 11-1{

TH( Jl( ...... Al ()N Of 1~ MM...,,. ~
AIDI0 lNt..OUCiH A. fl OUAl GVN l

UUA"i l( N[WAt 1' 0 1,,l!N~ llAl iO N ~ l ti .oOu';·
~ ANO HOM( l lh ,."1( 1 AG! N(• U,,,Ix l I"( !JI·
IN" ' I ANN ING -' '&gt;~l AN (I " CX, f l'IJ ,',..Jl,&lt;()f
IHO 1Y ~ (ll()N }01 OJ l ot!
~,t,,(, ,._-, OI
19'&gt; ' A\ AMI ND(0

HAl tA JIO IA l1H0l0 1t11 l W ANO AU0( 1A1U
L lt • f l ,. •• l l.L
IA• • I IOVl1

Cl• •l l • 6 •• 1f l.l. l• " Dl( Nl"l( ot •t lC11
... ...
, 110 ... 11

+•"

..

�I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

I
I

INTRODUCTION
Gaylord is a growing community in the center of a rapidly
developing area.
Increased trade activity and industrial development are expected to accompany this growth. The present
population of 2,600 persons is expected to increase to nearly
5,000 persons of permanent population by 1985. The Comprehensive Plan contemplates considerable development in the surrounding areas represented by continuous development of summer
homes, resorts and recreational facilities.
The Comprehensive Plan is designed to guide this growth
in Gaylord during the next 20 years. The major purpose of the
plan is to fully capitalize on the community's potential.
Gaylord, as the center of a growing tourist area, is advantageously located in relation to major metropolitan centers. The
area possesses resources in access and transportation, in industrial sites, and in a well-established residential and commercial center. The area should be able to successfully compete
with other communities in other counties for these developments.
If the community develops without proper planning and services,
the haphazard result could gradually discourage new growth. On
the other hand, a well-designed and efficient community can
assure a promising future and attract new growth.
Satisfactory living and working conditions in Gaylord are
essential to its growth if it is to achieve its potential as a
city of 5,000 in the center of a growing area.
These optimum
conditions cannot be obtained by providing public improvements
to the expediency of the moment or by allowing all private development to take place at the whim of the individual. There
must be a publicly accepted, overall comprehensive plan to coordinate all public improvements and to direct private development. By using the plan as a guide, duplications, waste and
lessened standard developments can be avoided. Gaylord has
had many changes in the past and will continue to change in
the future.
The plan should serve as a guide for these inevitable modifications to direct the building of new homes, new
plants, new businesses, and expanding community facilities.
The plan calls for the development of an improved central
business district, a large highway-oriented commercial area,
an industrial complex along the Interstate Highway, new residential areas to the north and southeast, a new elementary
school, several park areas, and a new city-county building,
all coordinated for the development of a modern community.
The Comprehensive Plan for Gaylord is primarily concerned
with physical improvements, public facilities in the form of

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I

-

2 -

streets, highways, airport facilities, parking lots, public
buildings, schools, parks, sanitary and storm sewers, water
lines and private developments such as the use of land, construction of buildings, division of · land and the appearance
and maintenance of property. Public improvements are directed
by a thoroughfare plan, a community facilities plan, and the
like. Private improvements are controlled by zoning, subdivision,building, and other regulatory ordinances and by the land
use plan. These plans and regulations "are : the basic components
of the Comprehensive Plan.

�II

-I
I

-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I

-

3 -

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY
Historical Background
Gaylord was organized as a village in 1881 and incorporated as a city in 1921. Gaylord has always been progressive in the provision of public services, as evidenced by its
development of a public water distribution system almost f rom
the very start. The courthouse was built in 1891, the first
electricity arrived in 1897, the first streets were paved in
1921, and the sewer system was started in 1933. The only bank
in Otsego County was founded in Gaylord in 1893.
The first railroad line from the south reached Otsego
Lake Village in May, 1873, and Gaylord in July, 1873. With
the advent of the railroad, the lumbering activity greatly increased since it was possible to ·transport much greater quantities of lumber. The pine lumbering activity soon reached
its peak and then was nearly depleted by 1890. The first industry, other than saw mills, to come to Gaylord was the Detroit
Iron and Furnace Company. This - company built two charcoal kilns
north of Gaylord sometime prior to 1890, however, they ceased
production in 1896. The Dayton Last Block Works was started in
1891. This industry used maple lumber for ten pins and blocks
and was a major industry for a number of years; employing about
30 people. The company went out of business about 1931. The
Jackson and Wylie Company of Saginaw, a hoop and stay mill, was
also started about 1890 and continued in business until about
1915.
In 1905, an east-west railroad from Boyne City to Alpena
with a daily total of four passe-n ger trains, in addition to the
freight trains, came to Gaylord. During the period from 1910
to 1915, there were 14 passenger · trains stopping at Gaylord
each day.
Industry was also active in the period shortly after the
turn of the century. The Gaylord Manufacturing Company, specialists in the manufacture of wagons and logging sleighs,
operated from approximately 1900 to 1915 and reached its peak
about 1908. An automobile factory manufacturing the "Gaylord
3ry• started about 1910, but was in business only for a few
years.
The Saginaw Wood Products Company operated from about
1915 to 1922. The 1930's saw little development in the area;
however, in 1941 both the Higgins Industry, Incorporated and
the Hidden Valley Ski Club · came to Gaylord.
In 1945, the
Standard Products Company located in Gaylord and the 0. W.
Rowley Company was established in the area.

�-

4 -

Table 1
ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Gaylord, Michigan

•
•
•
•

Retail Trade - 1963 - Gaylord
Establishments • • • • • . • • • . • 76 (62 with payroll)
Retail Sales • • . • .
• • • . • • • . • • $10,587,000
Payroll • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • $1,041,000
Selected Services - 1963 - Gaylord
Establishments • • • • •
• • • • 46 (22 with payroll)
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . • • •
• • • • • $819,000
Payroll • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • $164,000
Wholesale Trade - 1963 - Otsego County
Establishments. • • • • • • • • • •
• . . • • . • 23
Sales • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • $9,600,000
Payroll • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • $412,000

=
•
•I

•I
I
I
I

Manufacturing - 1958 - Otsego County
Establishments • • • • • • • .
Value Added by Manufacturing.

..

. . . . . . . . 18
• . • • $3,548,000

Agriculture - 1959 - Otsego County
Land in Farms • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • 69,000 acres
Number of Farms • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • . • 288
Total Value of Farm Products Sold • • • • • • • $643,000
Employment - 1960 - Otsego County
Agriculture, Forestry • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • 212
Construction. . • • •
• • • • . . • • • • • • • • 184
M~nufacturing • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • 579
Transportation, Communications and Utilities.
• • 75
Wholesale and Retail Trade . • • . • • • • . • • . • • 479
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate • • • • • • • • • 59
Public Administration • • • • • • • • • • . , , • • . 156
Business Services and Miscellaneous . • • . . • • . • 676
2,420
Source:

U. S. Census, 1958, 1959 and 1963

�-

5 -

In recent years, Gaylord has gained distinction as a
year-round tounist and resort center.
Ski resorts operate
in the winter; bunting and fishing facilities are available
throughout the year. The development of summer homes and
resorts on the many nearby lakes has grown steadily.
Geographic Location
Gaylord is strategically located in the northern part on
Michigan's lower peninsula on Interstate Highway 75, the main
north-south highway in the state, and on Michigan Highway 32,
an important east-west road.
Gaylord is within or close to a
70 mile radius of a large part of Michigan's tourist area, including Traverse City, Mackinaw City, Alpena and Houghton Lake.
The larger cities of Grand Rapids, Lansing and Flint are within a 150 mile radius, and the major metropolitan areas of
Detroit and Chicago are within a general proximity of 250
miles.
In addition, improved transportation facilities have
placed Gaylord and Otsego County in a favorable location to
attract tourists from such metropolitan centers as Toledo,
Indianapolis, Cincinnati and Louisville.

•
•
•
•
•
•I
I

Because of the area's central location in the northern
part of the lower peninsula, and because of the lack of large
cities in the area, Gaylord serves as a regional trading center for a relatively large area. Because of its favorable
position on a good transportation artery, the Interstate Highway, Gaylord and Otsego County are able to attract tourists
and economically transport manufactured products.
Economic Background
An analysis of the present economy of Otsego County and
a study of future economic development has been developed as
a part of the county plan. This study is contained in a report entitled, "Background for Planning" and essentially includes an economic study of Gaylord. The following section
summarizes the economic background for Gaylord and the area.
Some of the economic characteristics of Gaylord or Otsego
County are shown in Table 1 •
Trading enterprises in Otsego County employ nearly 25
percent of the labor force; most of this employment is located
within or close to the City of Gaylord.
Boasting a total of
76 retail establishments realizing annual sales in excess of
$10,000,000, Gaylord serves as the trading center for Otsego
County and areas in adjoining counties. The Gaylord regional
trade center is in competition with such cities as Traverse
City, East Jordan, Boyne City, Petoskey, Alpena and Grayling.

�- 6 -

Since the area around Gaylord is recognized as a tourist
center, selectedt services are a vital part of the city's economic base. There were 46 service establishments in the City
of Gaylord in 1963 with annual sales in excess of $800,000.
Gaylord also serves as a sub-wholesale trade center with 23
establishments realizing nearly $10,000,000 annually in wholesale sales.

•
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Although there has been a decrease in the number of farms
and land utilized in farms in recent years, agricultural activities are still an important part of the local economic
base, as evidenced by a 1959 total of 288 farms within -Otsego
County earning $643,000 in farm products sold •
In 1958, the value added by manufacturing through Otsego
County local industries was $3.5 million • . The five major manufacturing companies in the County - Standard Products, Higgins
Industry, O. w. Rowley Company, and Gaylqrd Tool _and Gauge have recently been joined by the U. S. Plywood Corporation,
which employs about 200 persons. By comparing _this situation
with the earlier one described under Historical Background,
the emergence of a much healthier distribution of manufacturing establishments is apparent.
From a low base in 1940, employment in manufacturing in
Gaylord increased by 300 persons to 1950 and increased an
additional 200 persons to 1960. This is attributable in part
to greater manufacturing activity; but probably an equally
important factor has been the growing tourist trade.
While
employment decreases in agriculture and the extractive industries have nearly equalled employment increases in manufacturing, there has been an overall employment increase of just over
50 percent in the 20-year period.
The future economy of the Gaylord area will generally be
an outgrowth of the existing base of the city and the county.
Industrial employment will probably continue to increase in
importance to the economic base.
The county area is still
relatively undeveloped from the standpoint of tourist activity
and summer home development, but is favorably located so as to
have the opportun~~Y to increase these developments.
If Gaylord and Otsego County are to gain new industry, it
will be necessary for leaders of the community to actively engage in competing for new industries. The recently formed
Industrial Development Corporation can do a great deal to further future industrial development within the area. Examples
of the types of industries that could advantageously locate in

�•
•
•
•
•
•I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

7 -

the area include operations involving the assembly of relatively small products not requiring high transportation costs,
fabrication of 'finished products, and wood-using industries .
It is anticipated that all types of tourist activity will
continue to be an important part of the economy and will continue to see growth in the future; however, most of this
growth will probably occur in the development of new summer
homes.
With increases expected in basic employment and tourist activity, there will be a corresponding increase in retail
trade and selective services.
As Gaylord and Otsego County experience growth, there will
be a corresponding need for additional construction.
Some
growth in the construction and building materials industry may
be expected.
Wholesale trade is already at a relatively high
level of activity and probably cannot be expected to experience
much more growth. There is a possibility of tapping a maple
syrup potential.
There are also lime deposits and at least
limited deposits of natural gas and oil within the county area.
These resources may hold some potential for future development.
Past population growth trends since 1900 for the City of
Gaylord, Otsego County, the state, and the nation are shown
in Table 2. Both the state and the nation have had increases
in population in every decade, though the rate of increase was
the lowest during the 1930's because of the economic depression. Otsego County's growth has fluctuated over the years,
but has steadily been increasing since the 1930's.
The City
of Gaylord has had a steady increase in population also since
1930, and the population has increased from some 1,600 to
2,600 persons during this period of time.
Projections of future population were prepared as a part
of the Otsego Comprehensive Planning Program and are contained
in a report on "Background for Planning". The population of
Otsego County was projected as a relationship to projections
of United Sfates population and State of Michigan population.
Projections for the populations for both the state and the
nation are also shown in Table 2. Based upon several estimates, the·· county Comprehensive Plan indicates a 1985 population in the county of some 11,000 persons of permanent population.
It is also expected that there will be a seasonal
population of 17,400 persons, thus making 28,400 persons the
total year-around equivalent population of the county.
As a part of these county projections, projections were
made for the population for the City of Gaylord.
It is expected that by 1985 the total population of the city will be

�-

8 -

Table 2
POPULATION TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS
Gaylord, Michigan

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Year

United
States
(1,000)

1900

75,995

2,421

6,175

1,561

1910

92,228

2,810

6,552

1,538

1920

106,022

3,668

6,043

1,701

1930

123,202

4,842

5,554

1,627

1940

132,165

5,256

5,827

2,055

1950

151,326

6,372

6,435

2,271

1960

179,323

7,823

7,545

2,568

2,960

1970

214,000 (1) 10,000 (2)

9,000 (3)

3,060

3,650

1980

260,000 (1) 12,500 (2) 10,400 (3)

3,540

4,340

1985

282,000 (1) 14,000 (2) 11,000 (3)

3,740

4,680

(1)
(2)
(3)

State of
Michigan
(1,000)

Otsego
County

City of
Gaylord

Gaylord
Urban Area

Projections by Bureau of Census, Series II Projections.
Interpolation from ORRRC Judgment Projections.
Estimated by Harland Bartholomew and Associates in
"Background for Planning", Otsego County, Michigan.

�II

•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

9 -

3,740 persons residing in 1,068 dwelling units (based upon a
population of 3 p5 persons per dwelling unit).
Within the urbanized or planning area of Gaylord (that is, the area bounded
by Congdon, East, McCoy and Murner Roads), there are an additional 592 new dwelling units shown in the distribution of
population plan. Thus, there would be a total of 1,336 dwelling units within the Gaylord planning area by 1985. This results in a projected population of 4,700 persons for the Gaylord
urban area by 1985 •

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

11 ...

LAND USE PLAN
The physical form of a community is the result of the
actions of many individuals and agencies. The buildings and
structures created by private enterprise require supporting
public facilities such as streets, utilities, parks and
schools. The manner in which these public and private improvements are related to one another largely determines the
character of the community.
Proper planning of these relationships results in an orderly, attractive community.
A survey of existing land uses in Gaylord was conducted
in March of 1965, in which every parcel of land in the city
and within the surrounding area was field-checked, classified
and mapped. This was essentially an up-dating of the land use
survey made as a part of the Otsego County planning program.
The eight major categories of land use include single, two and
multiple-family residential, commercial, light and heavy industrial, parks, public and semi-public property, and railroad
properties.
Existing Land Use Pattern
A land use map of the City of Gaylord and the surrounding
a~ea is shown on Plate 1. The land use pattern of Gaylord is
one of fairly uniform development, occupying a relatively large
part of the present corporate area. The largest concentration
of development is located east of Hidden Valley Ski Club, north
of the public golf course, and east of Interstate Highway 27.
There is a relatively sparse pattern of urban development within the environs of Gaylord with residential and commercial uses
scattered along the various state and county highways.
Residential uses occupy the greatest amount of developed
land area within Gaylord. Though the residential pattern is
located fairly uniformly around the central _business district,
new residential developments have been primarily taking place
to the northeast and north.
Scattered residential uses are
found along the highways leading out of the city, primarily
along Michigan 32 and Old Highway 27. The business district
is located at the crossing of M-32 and U. s. Highway 27, generally in the geographic center of the city. This is the
largest concentration of commercial land uses, but smaller
scattered commercial uses are located along the state and
federal highways. The largest concentration of outlying
commercial uses is found south of the city along Old Highway
27. Following completion of the Interstate Highway, a number
of new commercial uses located to the west end of the community along Main Street near the intersection of M-32 and the
Interstate Highway.

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 12 Table 3

•

EXISTING LAND USE IN GAYLORD
Gaylord; . Michigan

Land Use
Classification

Area in
Acres

Single-Family
Residential

Percent of Total
Corporate Area
Compared
Gaylord Cities

*

Percent of
Developed Area
Compared
Gaylord Cities *

. 147.6

14.44

17.10

29.0

34.08

6.1

.60

.. 2. 75

1.2

5.48

Commercial

31.2

· 3. 05

1.58

6.1

3.14

Industrial

23.5

2.29

2.83

4.6

5.65

Railroads

18.8

1.84

2.50

3.7

4.99

Parks

. 2.1

.21

2.55

0.4

5.08

Public and
Semi-Public

122.5

11.99

6.65

23.8

13.25

Streets

159.1

15.57

14.21

31.2

28.33

Two and Multiple
Family Residential

100.00
100.0·

Developed Area

510.9

Vacant Land

511.1

50.01

49.83

17022.0

100.00

100.00

Total Area

* The average of 28 other cities have a
population of less than 50,000.

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-I

L__,;,._,i
~~~~~~:;
~
~-~
~ ¥-~~·~il--' l ~~i

•~,,;

~• ~

7,

':"Dll/~

~

1
~-\~~
...1//,. "
.,.!..,, ..• -~

~

I):

½J v

1/,

.£"1i,i~ ~

\

·1.\

r

[~

\'·'\-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

~-

"

~

' ~

b

'

' ;,:;

1·,. $½'

S3''

~~l!!'im. . e ~~. . ~ : :~
,~1~~~~l~~ ~E~
~

.,;,~~~~~CJ~

.· .·;,·

. ··, ::;17,j.•.:

/',/: •

'°7-·•:;'
::&gt;~.!;;:; ..: . ··...

~r«

l"':% .··z,;···Y· :.,'· :. ·.··· ::0 .
~

.d.r$.~~

Jj

- J~~,~~-fa_ j ~~- ..... -- ,
l1~\.~\- . ·~~~~-~ f}JZ)§fr~"w--,1
-.li~,\\ .\1 t::i!f
~:
,
·
&lt;
.
'
.
i
l
~.
~
.
.
~~.·.·~.
~.
·
.
r·
.
:
·
.
~
.
~
.
·.:· .·'.·.~,.
t
I,
¾LbJ;~~r5ii&lt;&lt;·.~::&gt;z
1\-=-

~ ~~I

11-,,~,· :·, --·:· .: '.t,··.::.-&gt;~\.,::-.:./

•

1/,

~~ ,.__ »~
I

•

•

11

9

r··.··•·:. . ·.•.:,·:•:·:·:·1·:.•.

,.,
~

~ "•,l__

•

'

•

~

&gt;or, .._.,••~

•.i,..,.,.,,o,,.

w
(1M

~"·- ~ - •
¼',;.;

:

:;

I

r

1

✓,- J~ --------- /!... ,. -~~ l'L
✓~

h'

._.

- ~~

• ! • ....,• •• t,O,,,OJl ◄ o0,6

&lt;:-1 ..... .,, ....... t, """"" ... 1,11

U"' • • •""-- • l~·:· ~""-1

~t; i;~w~t1~•.,.

•LOC,l,., ..

..._1..o,._.

o, hol ~ " ,-:,

o

MA l lA•D IAn HOlOW[W AHO ,+,.S}OC IAlU

--.-

%

I°"
0'
, .,_"-'"C,.U I
#fOIZ f..-0.,C.- • 1ua, .. . c,., ... , IC:,., Joe
Ul,. l•• tito1 •••

""

½::

-;;:;::p,:;;:;7,,._===i•,;;.:;1/h=·.;:;::.=;;;II=

&lt;.1n •u••1u. (1"1lll•U•IIU. \•UIHC..,,1,uo, nt(.U
5'•• • T 101/IJ

IIIIU

l flM,

tHU0"'"'

~~~~o:tNNtNG ,o,.~i.-~!~~=

LAND USE - 19'=,S
fill
•
D
~

RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
PUBLIC AND SEMI - PUBLIC
INDUSTRIAL AND RAILROADS
PLATE

1

�-

•

•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

13 -

Industrial land uses form a definite pattern in Gaylord,
being concentrated along the railroad tracks. A number of
industrial uses have located in and around the central business district and are scattered to the southwest side of the
city. Public and semi-public uses occupy a considerable
amount of the area within and around the City of Gaylord. The
Hidden Valley Ski Club forms a large mass on the east side of
the city; the community school, the golf course, and city
property form a large mass to the south; the sanitarium and
hospital occupy larg-e---tracts to tlie north.
West of the Interstate Highway, the County Airport occupies a large tract which
further impedes future development in that direction •
The present population of Gaylord has developed a total
of 510 acres for urban purposes within the total corporate area
of 1,022 acres.
The area occupied by existing land uses in
Gaylord is reported in Table 3, along with comparative percentages of total corporate and developed area.
These percentages are compared with the average of 28 other central
cities having a population of less than 50,000.
A total of 511 acres of Gaylord's total corporate area
is presently vacant; thus, the city is very similar to the 28
compared cities. Gaylord's present population is using approximately 150 acres for residential purposes, 30 acres for
commercial activities, nearly 50 acres for industry and railroads, 125 acres for public and semi-public and parks, and 160
acres for streets.
Residential land uses occupy nearly 30 percent of Gaylord's
developed area which is somewhat lower than the 34 percent average for the compared cities.
Commercial uses occupy over six
percent of the developed area in Gaylord, which is nearly double
the percent of area devoted to this type of land use in the compared cities.
Industrial and railroad uses are somewhat lower
than the compared cities with eight percent of the developed
area of Gaylord devoted to this purpose compared to over 10 percent of the other cities. The lack of park space in Gaylord is
clearly pointed out in the comparisons made in Table 3. The
city has less than one percent of its developed a_r ea devoted to
parks, whereas in the compared cities over five percent of the
developed area is dedicated for park purposes. Public and semipublic uses in Gaylord occupy a considerably larger share of
the developed area.
Streets and alleys occupy a slightly higher
percentage of the developed area than is true of the compared
cities.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 14 Table 4
LAND USE AND POPULATION RATIOS
Gaylord, Michigan

Vandalia, - Jackson,
Illinois
Missouri

Gaylord,
Michigan

Oconto,
Wisconsin

LeMars,
Iowa

Single-Family
Residential

5.68

6.85

5.09

6.03

8.48

Two and Multiple
Family Residential

0.23

0.49

0.28

0.11

0.23

Commercial

1.12

0.60

0.51

0.74

0.57

Industrial

0.90

1.90

0.71

1.36

0.89

Railroads

0.72

1.31

0.73

0.53

0.41

Parks

0.08

2.29

1.96

0.61

1.16

Public and
Semi-Public

4.71

2.19

3.36

0.80

0.87

Streets

6.12

7.18

5.53

6.76

4.08

19.56

22.83

18.17

16.94

16.69

Land Use
Classification

Total
Developed Area

�I

l

"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

,r--------------·-...::c::

1-

r---

•

' " ' "1.0, .... (ll,.

1-UU 10.,,11

11,.. , .. llu, l~ • Olc ... , Al0,11ac:u
foU ,T
11144
• 1uo.,,.

(IW'SI,

C 'T Y ,uN~•hC. C01-.!M 155ION
GAYlOI.O
MICHIGAN

DISTRIBUTION OF
DWELLING
UNITS - f 9 (, 5 &amp; 1985
• ONE DOT REPRESENTS FOUR DWELLING
UNITS OR FOURTEEN PERSONS, 19f&gt;S
• ONE DOT REPRESEN TS FOUR DWELLING
UNITS OR FOURTEEN PERSONS. 1985

PLATE

2

�•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

~ - J,.5 -

Dwelling Unit Distribution
The present distribution of dwelling units within Gaylord
is shown on Plate 2, with one dot equalling four dwelling
units.
This distribution of dwelling units was determined
from the land use survey which counted a total of 744 dwelling
units within the city.
The present distribution of dwelling
units is a reflection of the existing land patterns within t he
community.
With the exception of the central area and a few
large public open spaces, the population is fairly uniformly
distributed. This population is concentrated in and around
the central part of the total corporate area and, to some extent, is scattered along the major highways leading from the
city.
Future Land Use Needs
Estimates of future land use needs for the community can
be developed from past trends in the relationship between land
use and population.
Acres of land used per 100 persons in
Gaylord is compared with four other cities of similar size located in the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois and Missouri.
Table 4 shows the definite similarity between Gaylord and the
compared cities in land use and population. These communities
are using approximately five to eight acres per 100 persons
for single-family residential purposes and a very minor amount
of land for two-family and multiple-family residential purposes.
There is a definite similarity in the amount of land per 100
persons used for commercial purposes in the other cities; however, Gaylord is using over one acre per 100 persons, which is
considerably more than the compared communities. A variation
is found in the amount of land used for industrial and railroad purposes, and Gaylord is using less area for these purposes than all of the other communities except one.
It is significant to note that Gaylord is using nearly five acres per
100 persons for public and semi-public uses compared to the
next highest of 3.3 acres per 100 persons.
This ratio will
undoubtedly increase in the future. Gaylord is using an average amount of land per 100 persons for streets and alleys.
The probable future land use needs of Gaylord are based
upon the 1985 estimated population of 4,700 persons. The
present population is using 19.56 acres of land per 100 persons for all types of land uses. The amount of land needed
for every 100 persons is expected to decrease slightly; however, the land required for various types of uses is expected
to alter significantly.
Future land use requirements for
Gaylord are shown in Table 4.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

-

16 -

The acres used per 100 persons for single-family residential purposes will increase slightly to six acres per 100
•
persons, recognizing
the recent trends toward larger lot
sizes.
With the development of highway commercial activities
in the Gaylord area, it is expected that the amount of land
used per 100 persons for commercial activities will increase
to approximately 1.50 acres per 100 persons.
Similarly, industrial needs are expected to increase to approximately two
acres per 100 persons.
As previously noted, the amount of
land in Gaylord devoted to park purposes is unusually low.
Based upon national standards, the future needs are estimated
at one acre per 100 persons of population.
As previously
noted, the amount of land in Gaylord devoted to streets and
public rights-of-way is extremely high. This ratio should
decline in the future as new areas are planned and more spacious street developments and larger block sizes are developed.
Commercial and industrial land uses are expected to increase
significantly during the next several decades.
The increases
shown in the table reflect a trend toward larger floor areas
in stores and industrial plants, greater parking requirements,
and increased needs for open storage and expansion.
Based upon these ratios of land use and population, the
future population of 4,700 persons would require a total of
890 acres of land for urban purposes. This would require
nearly 380 acres of vacant land to be absorbed for urban land
uses.
An additional 140 acres would be required for residential purposes, 40 acres for commercial, 75 acres for industrial, nearly 50 acres for park, and only an additional 40
acres for public and semi-public purposes.
It is expected
that the total amount of land needed for streets will only increase from 160 to 190 acres.
The present use of 511 acres
would increase to 890 acres occupying nearly all of the present corporate area of the community.
The foregoing analysis
indicates the amount of land that should be provided in the
future land use plan and indicates the amounts of commercial
and industrial areas that should be provided for in zoning
areas within the present corporate limits and within the
areas immediately around the corporate limits.
Land Use Plan
The proposed land use arrangement for a future community
of 4,700 is shown in the Land Use Plan (See Plate 3), which
generally indicates the areas proposed for residential, commercial, industrial, and open space uses.
The Land Use Plan
is a synthesis of the economic population and land use studies.
Concurrent consideration was given to circulation and street
planning, community facilities, open spaces, and the total potential of the site.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

~

'\

,,.........

\

\

\

- + - - - - = =-------- -------

~\

": .~.: ( T

"
".

\
'(.l .,.,_r t .. •

)(

,,
I

'::

\

:.·/'
\1

\,.._ ,
__

(

--- I -

--- - □, i ,,
' -

j.!:7;,

]

l

I

.
I
I

--;

I

1

; "i-

,

I

- ,.. .

I

l

,·:-.$

I

_ _ _jI

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

•t&gt;0 ,1'1' ot,,t 'TO
c;o-..F

USE

LAND
D
~

D
•
E23
-

C.OU'l..'5.'-

I

PLAN - 1985

RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
PUBLIC AND SEMI - PUBLIC.
PARKS, SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS
INDUSTRIAL AND RAILROADS
MAJOR STREETS
PLATE 3

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

17 -

This plan contemplates the rehabilitation and rebuilding of the central business district as the continued focal
point of commercial activity within the community and within
the trade area. Residential development has been confined
fairly well to create proper population densities. Industrial development has been held to the existing industrial
areas along the railroad tracks and in a new area located
along the west side of the Interstate Highway. Recreational
activities and open spaces have been created to serve the
various residential areas.
Residential Areas
The development of three major residential areas, with
park areas to serve as focal points for each residential area,
are contemplated. The existing elementary school located on
the south side of the city would serve the present residential
area south of Main Street and some proposed residential developments also south of Main and to the east of the existing
school site. A second residential area would be located north
of Main and east of the railroad tracks.
This residential
area would primarily be served by a proposed elementary school,
athletic field, and park area on Hayes Road. A third and
smaller residential area would include those areas west of
the railroad tracks, served by one 10-acre park area.
A desirable future distribution of dwelling units within
Gaylord was developed concurrently with the land use studies.
One dot on Plate 2 equals four dwelling units of the 1985 population of 4,700. A greater part of the new dwelling units
are expected to locate to the southeast, northeast, and north,
with lesser increases along the west city limits. The future
distribution also contemplates a limited amount of filling in
of certain of the vacant areas in the north section of the
city. This proposed distribution of dwelling units suggests
a generally balanced pattern and does not contemplate extensive dwelling unit development beyond the planned residential
areas of the community~ The planned future distribution of
dwelling units should result in an adequate density of dwelling units so as to provide a sound urban pattern. Generally
speaking, the density of the new and growing areas is slightly
less than the density of the present developed residential
areas of the city.
In the usual residential neighborhood, approximately one-half of the land is used for residential purposes with the remaining one-half used for streets, schools,
parks, churches, and parcels of vacant land. A residential
development with lots averaging 7,500 feet in area produces a
density for approximately three dwelling units per acre, in
contrast to large lots (20,000 square feet) where the average

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

18 denstty would be one dwelling unit per acre. - The Land Use
Plan and the dist r ibution of dwelling units shown on Plate 2
provide _a density of approximately two to three dwelling uni ts
per acre. This density is adequate to provide normal urban
services at reasonable costs.
Commercial Development
Under the proposed plan, the central business district
would remain the dominant commercial center of the city. Recognizing the need for highway commercial developments, the
plan proposes the commercial development at Main Street and
the Interstate Highway on the west side of the city. This is
in line with the economic requirements for greater recreational-tourist commercial activity, with planned touristoriented facilities at the various interchanges along the
Interstate Highway. This commercial center would be used
primarily for motels, restaurants, and various entertainment
and recreational activities. It is expected that the commercial uses south ·of the city would also be highway and touristoriented. Continued u~e of this area has been provided in
the plan as well as a new smaller commercial center to the
north on Old Highway 27 at the north city limits. This commercial area would _be primarily for service of residential
uses.
Parks and Open Spaces
- Although Gaylord has a large amount of land dedicated
to various open spaces, only a limited amount of land has
been provided for actual park use. The comprehensive plan
proposed the development of three major recreational park
areas within the corporate limits. The present city park
and community school on the south side of the city would be
enlarged by approximately 30 acres over to a proposed extension of Grandview Boulevard. A completely new and enlarged
park, recreation and educational complex is proposed in
the 40-acre tract on Hayes Road. This proposed park area
would serve the residential area north of Main Street and
would also provide_ athletic field facilities for the entire
county. The third and smaller open space has been proposed
in the west side of the city to serve the immediate residential area.
Industrial Areas
Industrial development is proposed to be continued along
the railroad tracks along the southeast side of Gaylord. However, future industrial growth is primarily expected to take

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I

-

19 -

Table 5

•
FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS
Gaylord, Michigan
Acres of Land Per 100 Persons
Land Use
Classification

Needed by 1985

Acres of Land
Used in 1961

5.68

6.00

147.6

0.23
1.12
0.90
0.72
0.08

0.20
1.50
2.00
o. 70
1.00

6.1
31.2
23.5
18.8
2.1

4. 71
6.12

3.50
4.00

122.5
159.1

19.56

18.40

510.9

Used in 1965

Single-Family
Residential
Two and Multiple
Family Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Railroads
Parks
Public and
Semi-Public
Streets and Alleys
Total

Acres of Land
Needed in 1985 (1)
Single-Family
Residential
Two and Multiple
Family Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Railroads
Parks
Public and
Semi-Public
Streets and Alleys
Total

(1)

280
10
70
100
30
50
160
190
890

Based on a population of 4,700.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

- 20 -

place in the large industrial area along the west side of
Interstate 75. Tllis area would be served by the interchange
on the Interstate Highway in Gaylord at M-32 and by an interchange to the south with Old 27. The area is also close to
the existing Otsego County Airport. Thus, the proposed future
industrial area would be provided with highway access from the
Interstate Highway, with a major east-west highway and with
ready access to airport facilities.
The Land Use Plan provides for a total urban area of
1,500 acres. Of this, approximately 680 acres has been set
aside for residential development. The plans provide for 200
acres of commercial development which is ample to meet the
estimated 70 acres shown in Table 5. The industrial areas
shown in the plan are far in excess of those needed for the
City · of Gaylord; however, this industrial area is designed
to serve the long-range needs of the entire county and is coordinated with the Land Use Plan for Otsego County. A total
70 acres of park space is provided in the Land Use Plan which
is in excess of the required 50 acres shown in Table 5.

�I
I

I
I
I

I·

I

I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I

I
I

-

21 -

THOROUGHFARE PLAN
The movement of traffic throughout a community can best
be accomplished by designating and improving to desirable
standards relatively few strategically-placed, direct and
continuous routes.
Control is facilitated and movement becomes more continuous, even when the traffic is concentrated
on a few thoroughfares, than when it is dispersed on most of
the streets within the community.
The major streets can be
improved with w~der and heavier pavements to accommodate
ordinary traffic:. as well as the movement of trucks and heavy
vehicles.
The remaining minor streets, which would constitute three-fourths of the total street system, can then be
relatively narrow and lightly paved. Thus, the cost of the
original construction of the street system as a whole can be
substantially reduced and the expense of street maintenance
can be held to a minimum. Further, as the preponderance of
traffic can be diverted from residential neighborhoods -to
the streets in such areas, such streets will be safer to use
and will be less noisy.
Present Street System
Gaylord's street system has developed gradually since
the 1870's. During a century of evolution, the street system
has grown through the dedication of many individual rightsof-way and subdivisions. These have been generally small and,
for the most part, uncoordinated. The present system forms a
gridiron pattern generally oriented due north, south and eastwest.
Development of a gridiron system in Gaylord has created
problems found in most communities; that is, there is little
differentiation between major and minor streets, resulting in
the division of traffic on many of the residential streets.
Because of the original platting and fairly small blocks, there
is an obvious excess of streets; in some instances there are
streets every 300 feet in some of the originally platted sections near the center of the city.
Gaylord is served by Old U. s. Highway 27 which enters
the city from the north on Center Street, travels through the
central business area on Main Street, and extends to the south
out of the city on Otsego Avenue.
Michigan Highway 32 is an
important east-west route in northern Michigan and runs from
Charlevoix to Alpena. This route follows Main Street through
the entire length of the City of Gaylord.
Interstate 75, a
federal highway, is not a part of the Gaylord street system in
the strict sense, but does provide access to the city from
other parts of the county, the state, and the nation.
Interstate 75 passes along the west side of the city with a traffic

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

22 -

Table 6

•

EXISTING MAJOR STREET DATA
Gaylord, Michigan

Section

Name of Street
Main Street
Center Avenue
Otsego Avenue
Ohio Avenue
Fourth Street
Mitchell Street
Congdon Road
Hayes Roaq.
Five Lake Road
McCoy Road
Dickerson Road
Murner Road

Right-ofWay Width

Pavement
Width

80'
66'
66'

20'
20'
20'

66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'

20'
20'
20'

Limits to Limits
Limits to Main
Main to Limits
Morgan Road
Main to Limits
Illinois to Oak
Ohio to Center
Morgan to Hayes
Main to Congdon
Morgan to Hayes
U.S. 27 to East
M-32 to South
M-32 to North
Type of Paving (1)

Name of Street
Main Street
Center Avenue
Otsego Avenue
Ohio Avenue
Fourth Street
Mitchell Street

Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Oil Seal and 1,320' Gravel
Oak to Elm Bit. Agg. Bal. Oil Seal
Bit. Agg. Center to Otsego 39' Wide

Congdon Road
Hayes Road

Unimproved Earth
3,328' Oil Seal Bal. Unimproved
Earth
Morgan to Old 27 Bit. Agg. Bal. Oil
Seal
Bituminous Aggregate
Bituminous Aggregate
Bituminous Aggregate

Five Lake Road
McCoy Road
Dickerson Road
Murner Road

;

(1) Conc rete, bituminous,-•oiled, gravel
(2) Good, fair, poor

**

20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
Condition(2)
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair to
Good
Poor
Fair to
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good

�I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 23 interchange at the south end of the urban area where it
crosses Old U. s. 27 and on the west side of the city where
it crosses Michigan Highway 32.
Gaylord presently bas a fairly adequate street system,
consisting of Main Street which bisects the city in an eastwest direction, Murner Road, Center Avenue, Ohio Avenue, and
Hayes Road which run north from Main Street, Sand Road,
Otsego Avenue south of Main Street, and a fairly continuous
number of east-west routes consisting of Congdon Road, Five
Lake Road, Mitchell Street, Fourth Street and McCoy Road.
Data on the existing major streets within the Gaylord area is
shown in Table 6. By-and-large, most of the right-of-ways
are 60 foot with the exception of Main Street which has an
SO-foot right of way. The Interstate Highway, not actually
a part of the internal street system, has a right-of-way width
of 400 to 500 feet.
All of the existing major streets in
Gaylord have two moving lanes with various widths for parking
lanes. Most of the paving is bituminous and is generally in
fair condition~
Lack of continuity found in some of the major thoroughfares in the southern part of the city is one of the major
problems of the present street system. For example, Fourth
Street does not run continuously east-west; there is no connection between Grandview Boulevard and Center Avenue, Maple
Avenue, or Hayes Road.
There is also a lack of any adequate
connection between several of the north-south routes such as
Wisconsin Avenue with Ohio Avenue. Another problem is the
absence of cross-town routes in the northern part of the city.
North Street, for example, does not run continuously between
Ohio Avenue and Hayes Avenue. There are five railroad crossings of existing streets with the New York Central Railroad
tracks within Gaylord.
A number of these crossings do not
have proper protection.
Traffic Patterns
The average daily traffic flow in Gaylord for the major
streets within the city and on important county roads is shown
on Plate 4. These traffic volumes were obtained from counts
made by the State Highway Department in 1962 and from traffic
counts made by the Automobile Club of Michigan within Gaylord
in 1963. Some of the counts were obtained from the County
Road Commission's survey made in 1959.
As is apparent, the most important corridor of traffic
through the city is Main Street, which bad a peak 24-hour
traffic volume in excess of 15,000 vehicles within the central
business district.
As would be expected, the next highest
volumes are found on Old u. s. 27 with some 4,400 cars on

�I
I
I
I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

- 24 Center Avenue north of Main Street and some 7,700 cars on
Otsego Avenue sout'h of Main Street. · The traffic volumes on
Main Street reduce very rapidly at the edges of the urban
area with some 3,700 vehicles on Main Street or U. S. 32 just
east of the city limits • . Twenty-four hour traffic volumes on
the Interstate Highway are approximately 3,000 to 3,500 vehicles per day, however, much higher volumes exist during the
summer months. Most of the traffic on the Interstate is
through traffic; it does ,not originate or have its destination
within the City of Gaylord. Traffic flow on most of the other
streets within the city is less than 1,000 cars. Mitchell
Street does have some 1,600 cars in a 24-hour period just east
of Court Avenue. The traffic counts indicate that there is a
fairly wide dispersal of cars traveling over the other streets both major and minor - within· the community. For example, approximately five of the streets south of Main Street have
traffic flows between .700 and 1,000 vehicles. This indicates
that none of these streets is functioning as a major street;
that all of the traffic is dispersed widely over all of the
residential streets within the area, much to the disadvantage
of the residential amenities of these areas.
Traffic in urban areas is expected to increase from four
to five percent per year; thus, by the year 1985 traffic is
expected to increase approximately 100 to 125 percent. For
the purposes of estimating future traffic volumes in Gaylord,
the existing traffic flows can be increased by 100 percent
for the 20-year period. Application of this increase to certain existing volumes · reveals some significant increases; for
instance, traffic flow on Main Street by 1985 would be in excess of 30,000 vehicles in a 24-hour period compared to the
present range of 15,000 cars in 24 hours.
Proposed Thoroughfare Plan
The proposed thoroughfare plan bas incorporated as many
of the existing streets within the community as possible,
with the number and length of proposed thoroughfares held to
a minimum consistent with sound planning principles. The
street plan was developed in conjunction with the highway
plan for the county and with the land use plan to insure
proper development and access to all future land use development within the city.
(See Plate 5.)
The proposed major street system in Gaylord would consist of three major north-south routes - Wisconsin-ObioMorgan, Otsego-Center and Hayes Road. The east-west routes
would consist of Congdon Road, Five Lake Road, North Avenue,
Main Street, Fourth Avenue, and Grandview Boulevard.
In
order to complete this system of major thoroughfares, several extensions and improvement of existing major thoroughfares would be necessary.

�•I
I
1·

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

~

7

t.

t-

\•

!'I

\

11

)

H I DDEN
V~Ll[Y

J

"':j
_,

5KI

-

[tj.

.

-- lI

-

\I

t -

[J

~

-

...

I

)

0

0

-/'

'I

,.

Cl"'t"i a.•

I

- ~' ~ ~ = - ·

r1rm=-~

11~1

...

\

'

I

- ·

,\

::·
-~:_...;-t=
·
::!
-r-

-

-

.-~~
I

.

.
1··":.~-----=-·=::::.::::.:.::.·( -~'

'

\':[

- - ---

,,
:)

,:•

-

__

ii
;:::

M-3'2. ~ - , 1

§i~

~

I

g,c::l

" ? ..,,,..

~-

!

-

I

•

I

.

:::·:::: -:::
·- OTSE.GO

1
I
..J.

COUNTY

Al RPOR.r

TRAFFIC
PER

VEHICLES

F LOW ~'/! ENTY - FOUR

1965

HOUR PERIOD

0

GRAPH IC. SC.ALE

PLATE

4

�I

I

HIDDEN
V~LLEY

L - -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

CLUB

'-------~II

.

I

LJ

----------

~E
~E
~II
E
~

.,

-

ffl

MAJOR
--:

STREET PLAN

=

EXISTING MAJOR STREETS
PROPOSED MAJOR STREETS
MINOR STREETS
PROPOSED
STREET VACATIONS

•

RAILROAD

c::Jc::J

-

I

I
.

CROSSING

ELIMINATIONS

L-J

�I
I
I
I
I

ST~E.ET

~·
E

Pldl.KINy

LANE

LANE®

LEFT

STAN Dl\"-D

AIMT

su.. 1,e
Z-u.,..Ufll

ACCEPT

0

Al'&gt;LE

,h

Ja

&amp;MJ,Hl.

Ja

rizD
. ,.

,

-

S10fWA\.IC...~
J....OW LINt

~~
ni-

~

:i:

I

10 11

I

! 0·10-,·, ro~· ,J

I I !I
d
1

Sll..lPl

d]

f--.. E. QUI
80' il-.OW

I

,-P AI NT

/

I

~

,

_ _o_·

I

I

n

I ,;;:O'-~H I

I1. ~ H
11

.

G.O' 11...0W

;B"

1Z' f-

l ' C.

~- -·

10 · TO I~'

YOUHl,-.Mt

~

I

I

t&lt;.' TO 19"

I

LtJ,.A.fJIC lAlll fDOf

UNf tt&gt;Cil

f--..lGHT-OF-WAY

~

vu.. 1,..&amp;Lt
~

'

Ji

I

(Ci"-ASS STll..lP
AND SIDEWALK)

U .. AfflC
LAN£ f D ( j l '

.

n

MINIMUM

-··1

''

l'&gt;O"-DEft...~

LANES ONLY)
10'

--

MWIANQ)

(TO T"-AFFIC

- ~

I

E.LE.MENT5

l'&gt;Al-..1(..IE"-. CU"-.1'&gt;
CLEA"-ANCE

TUlN CI))

ll'

"E M E. N T S
100' 11...0W.

IZO'kO. W

N

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

C ~OS S - S E.C TION

(1H"-.U O"-.

y

~

f0 ~
TH o~o u G H FA ~E s

Tft...AFFIC

T

I
I
I

I
I

s TA N DA~D s

G [_ N t ~AL
MAJ 0 ~

le

2 TkMFIC L,l.NE s ®
0 PAkK..IN6 LANES

STANDH... D

2 H.AfflC L,l.NES®
1 P,l.JP...KIN6 LANE

AC.Cf PTAME
500-(750) 0

STANO,l.J..0

2 TkAFFIC L,l.NES ®

ACCEPTAIHE
SS0 ·(850)+

SlANDA/1...D

2 PM... K..IN6 LANES
3 H.MFIC LANES@
0 PAkKINO L,l.NtS

~CCEPTA&amp;LE
(11SO)•

STANDAJP...D

SS0-(800)•

&lt;.OO·C8SO)•

(.50-(1100)+

-

(1300) 0

3 H... AFFIC LANES @
I PAJ..KINCi LANE

MINIMUM
(950)·

ACCEPT ASLE
(1150) 0

SlANDAkD

;) H..MFIC LANES @
2 PAkKINCi LANES

MINIMUM
(1350)•

,l.CCE PTA!&gt;LE
(1500)•

STANO.-.,._D
(1(.00)•

4 TkAfflC LANl5 (i)
0 PAkKIN&lt;i LANES

MINIMUM
000

ACCEPTA!&gt;Lt
850

STANDA'--D
1100

4 TkAFFIC L,l.NES
I LEFT 1Ul'...N LANE
0 PAI..KIN(i L,l.NfS

CD

(1300) •

MINIMUM
10,0

AC.C.f PTA!&gt;LE
IZSO

STAHDAJP....D
1~00

4 TkAFFIC LANlS CD
2 PAl'...KIN(i LANES

MINIMUM
900

ACCEPTAIILE
1200

STANDAJP....O
1400

4 T/1...AFFIC L,l.NES CD
1 LEFT TU'-N L,l.Nf
Z PAJ...KIN(i LANtS

M I NIMUM
11,0

ACClPTAe.LE
1300

SUNDAJP....O
IC.00
II

CI)

THE LEFT TUl'...N LANES MAY I;[ 10' WIDE

WITHOUT

SO-.IOUSLY

IMPAk l NCi

OPE!l-.ATION

(V WHfk[ PAJ..KINCi LAN[S Akf TO !&gt;E USED ,l.S PlAK-HOUk TJ..AFFIC LANES, TH[Y SHOULD !&gt;E DESIGNtD 10 H.AfflC LAN[

@

STANOA'-DS WITH J...EuAkO TO CUk~ CUA'--,l.NCt LAN[ WIDTH, ,l.NO P,l.lNT STJ..IPE LOCATION.
IF THE M[DIAN CONTAINS ,l. L[fT TU'-N LAN[, THE LEFT Tu,:..N L,l.Nl WIDTH
(10·-12·) MUST H
MlDl,l.N WIDTH.
THE LA'--Cilk bOkDt/1... WIDTHS SHOULD H USED ON THt WIDl/1... C'--OSS-S[CTIONS

ADDED

TO

THE

@
G) NO MEDIAN 15 CONSIDE'-.EO ON TH[S[ CkOSS-SECTIONS

©
(?)

THES[ CJP...055-SECTIONS AkE fOJ... ONE-WAY TI..AfflC ONLY.
THES[ o . . oss-SECTIONS Al-.[ fO'-. TWO -W AY T'-AfllC ONLY
PAlt..KIN(i Pt'-.MITHO ONLY WHO...f P,l.lt..KIN(i LANES PkOVIDtD.
NUMbl'-.S UN0[/1... O ..OSS-StCTION CLASSIFICATIONS D[SIGNATt DESIGN CAP,'\CITY IN VEHICl[S P[/1... HOU'-. bY c,:..oss-StCTION
PLAIN NUMM'-S All..t FOk TWO-WAY TkAfflC-PA/1...!NTHESIS NUMM"'-S A'-E FO'-- CNf·W,'\Y 11-AfflC.
DATA TAIC.fN Fl'...OM OfSICiN CAPACITY CHA'--TS FO'-. SICiNMIZtD SlkElT ,'\NO HIGHWAY INTfkStCllONS, bUlt..lW Of PUHIC
'-OADS, kEVISfD I9S9, WllH THE fOLLOWIN(i ASSUMPTIONS : 10¼ Tl'...UCK.S - 20% ll.I6H1 TUl'...N - 10Y. LEFT TU'-N - NO !&gt;US
STOPS· 61'...EtN/CYClt 4SYo· NO SEPA'-,l.ll LlfT TUl'...N SICiNAL-P,\'-K.INCi Pl'...OHlblTtD 100 flll fl'...OM I Nlll'...Sl(T IO N
•DOWNTOWN Al'...lA (fOI.... ONE-WAY STl'...llTS ONLY)
+f'-lNCit "'-f,l. (fO k ONf-WAY SlkflTS ONlY)
INltl'...MlOl,l.H Alt..E,l. FO,:.. TWO-WAY H.ArFIC VOLUMES

•4) ,...,.,,:,.,11
'"'°"""' • ho).._.,(,l••
~-_. . . . •.:;::4.!~:C~!!t~~.,:.,"'t.~
• -1

u,,.1.-100,

•'tlO

,.., • ••-&lt;-

0f
llDI"' •

•ur11 MO( t

~u '; ,w:.!. ..rov

0,

'"°"'-'" , .,,_

'"'

MAllAfilO tAlltiOI011tfW Af&lt;O AUOCIAll)

1 1l()w I...

..o.n..c. ""'

Of

~

!:'~

1• ~~:",~ll,

t,o,~t•":

" ll • ~ ..~,.-01.(A#I

'•°''"" "IG
GAnOt0
C 1'1'

•:~,•:!(ul~

I
.
i

C~•v. !r.~ ION
M ICHIG~N

PLATE 6
.', j

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 25 -

One of the mpst important proposals of the thoroughfare
plan is the re-routing of traffic from Main Street within the
central business district.
It is therefore recommended that
through traffic using Old U. S. Highway 27 continue south on
Center Avenue from Main Street to Second Street, travel two
blocks westward to Otsego Avenue, and then resume south along
the present route.
One of the most serious points of congestion in the city is the two-block section on Main Street between Center Avenue and the railroad tracks.
This would relieve this congested area of through north-south traffic. Main
Street would, of course, continue to handle through east-west
traffic.
This by-pass route would not require any new rightsof-way with the exception of rounding the northwest corner of
Second Street and Center Avenue.
There is a definite lack of through streets in Gaylord
south of Main Street. The thoroughfare plan would provide for
a new north-south route which would primarily consist of an
extension of Grandview Boulevard northeasterly into Hayes Road
at Main Street. This route would enable all traffic entering
the city from the east which is destined for the southern
parts of the city to by-pass the central business district.
It would also provide a boundary for the proposed expansion
of the school and park site. Much of the right-of-way for
this route could be acquired as properties are subdivided,
and the land is dedicated for future development. The land
use plan indicates a need for some improved east-west routing
in the northerly part of the city.
It is, therefore, recommended that North Street be developed as a continuous route
from Ohio Avenue over to Hayes Road. This would require several new sections of rights-of-way as shown on Plate 5, which
also could be acquired as these areas are subdivided in the
future.
Several other adjustments to the major street system are
recommended in the thoroughfare plan.
It is proposed that
Wisconsin Avenue be re-routed into Ohio Avenue, as shown in
the plan, to an area that is presently under consideration as
a shopping center.
A second improvement would be the extension
of Fourth Street from Maple Avenue easterly to the Grapdview
Boulevard extension, providing continuous east-west traffic
from Hayes to Wisconsin.
Five Lake Road and Congdon Road
would continue to provide important east-west major routes in
the northern part of the city.
The recommended cross-sections
for the proposed streets are shown on Plate 6.

�I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I

I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I

- 27 THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Gaylord's business district serves as a focal point
for a majority of the community's varied economic and social
activities and as a trade and tourist center for the surrounding territory.
The present business area is comparable with that of
other communities of similar size. Most of the buildings were
erected many years ago, and today are approaching obsolescence.
The area grew without any real direction, being developed by
many separate individuals without consideration for the entire
area. The present street system is fairly adequate; however,
in previous years a great volume of through traffic was forced
into this central area.
Although there is a sizeable amount
of on-street parking, very little off-street parking has been
developed.
Little, if any, attention has been given to pedestrian access other than provision of standard sidewalks.
Land Use Pattern
The preponderance of commercial development is found
along the frontages of Main Street from the railroad tracks
to Center Avenue, a three block distance. This area contains
the primary retail and walk-in commercial facilities.
Commercial uses are also found along Main Street from the railroad
tracks west to the Interstate 75, but they are more in the
nature of automotive-oriented commercial facilities such as
restaurants, filling stations, and entertainment facilities.
Commercial uses are also found along some of the streets
crossing Main Street, although to a lesser degree. The
greatest secondary concentration is along Otsego Avenue primarily south, and to some extent north, of Main Street. Commercial uses have scattered in and around Hurst and Second
Street south of Main Street. These commercial uses in Gaylord
primarily form an elongated pattern which does not provide the
most efficient and desirable type of commercial center.
Only
a limited number of industrial uses have intermixed with the
commercial uses within the commercial area.
A railroad track
crossing Main Street has provided a barrier for commercial
uses to the west.
Gaylord's business district is not totally prepossessing
in its appearance.
Although there have been a number of buildings remodeled in recent years, a number of which are along the
Tyrolean architectural line, many remaining buildings are old
and obsolete.
In addition to the obsolete buildings, the
presence of numerous signs and overhead telephone and utility

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I

I
I

wires and poles ·add to the cluttered appearance of the area.
Any re-planning of Gaylord's business district should give
serious consideration to the aesthetic improvement of the
total area and all of the buildings within the area.
These conditions are not peculiar to Gaylord. Practically every city has recognized the poor appearance of its
central area and is attempting to accent attractiveness in
order to successfully compete with newly developing centers.
Street Pattern
The streets of Gaylord's business district are laid • out
in a system running north-south and east-west. Through traffic is concentrated ·on Main Street and there are no parallel
streets that are used to by-pass traffic around the area.
Early problems of the business district were created because
both U. s. 27 and Michigan 32 passed directly through the
area on Main Street. The completion of Interstate Highway
75 removed much of the north-south traffic; however, there
continues to be a considerable amount of through traffic on
Michigan 32. Through traffic does not add to the activity
of the area and represents a detriment to the area's future
function.
The right-of-way width of all streets within the
central area is 66 feet with the exception of Main Street,
which has an 80-foot right-of-way.
Traffic volumes within the central area are comparatively
high for a community of Gaylord's size. Traffic volumes on
Main Street, between Center and the railroad tracks, are in
excess of 15,000 cars in a 24-hour period. A high volume is
also found on Otsego Avenue south of Main, with 7,700 cars in
24 hours.
West of the railroad tracks, the traffic volume
decreases to 9,200 cars in a 24-hour period. North of Main
Street on Old Highway 27, the volume is more than 5,000 vehicles. Minor traffic flows are found on Mitchell Street, First
Street and Second Street - all less than 1,000 vehicles in 24
hours.
Peak hour traffic volumes generally represent ten percent
of the total 24-hour traffic flow. The highest peak hour
volume within Gaylord's business area would be on Main Street
at Court Avenue, with a peak flow of approximately 1,500 vehicles.
The capacity of this street, assuming 500 cars per lane,
would indicate that traffic flow on Main Street is reaching a
critical point, especially during the peak-hour periods and
during the summer months. The peak flow, however, on the remainder of the streets within the area, does not appear to be
critical. There is no need for any major pavement widening.

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

I
I

- 29 Parking Facilities
Existing parking facilities in the business district consist primarily of curb spaces with only a small amount of offstreet parking.
The following review of the use of parking
facilities indicates that while there are a number of curb
spaces, there is a definite need to provide additional offstreet parking facilities.
The types of existing parking facilities are summarized
in the following:
Type of
Parking Facility

Number of Spaces

Street Parking
2-Hour Meters
2-Hour Meters - Summer
12-Minute Meters
12-Minute Meters - Summer
10-15 Minute Posted
12 10-15 Minute Posted
2-Hour Posted
No Limit
Total
Off-Street Parking
Public Lots
Private Lots
Total
Total All Parking·

110
89
2
2

15
108
54
15
380
51
289
340
720

There are a · total of 720 parking spaces within the central business district study area. Of the total, only 340 (or
47 percent) are off-street spaces, with the majority being on~treet parking spaces. Most of the on-street parking space is
·2-hour posted or 2-hour metered,
These, with the no-limit
spaces, total 304 parking spaces which can be used by persons
parking for a fairly long period of time.
Only 42 percent of
the parking spaces within the central area are designed for
tourists or for shoppers remaining parked for less than two
hours.
It is unfortunate that, of the 720 existing spaces, a
total of 289 are private parking spaces, representing 40 percent of the total parking within the study area.
The off-street parking facilities within the business district are generally inconvenient and are not easily accessible
to the commercial frontages along Main Street. A parking turnover and accumulation study was conducted within the study area

�I
I

- 30 -

I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Table 7
· PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLES PARKING BY . TIME PERIODS

Gaylord, Michigan

Time Period

½ hour
½ to 1

or less
hour
1 to l½ hours
l½ to 2 hours
2 to 2½ hours
2½ to 3 hours
3 to 3½ hours
3½ to 4 hours
4 hours or more

Time Period

½ hour
½ to 1

or less
hour
1 to l½ hours
l½ to 2 hours
2 to 2½ hours
2½ to 3 hours
3 to 3½ hours
3½ to 4 hours
4 hours or more

· source:
(1)

Two-Hour
Meters

Two-Hour
Posted (1)

80.2
13.2
3.8
2.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
100.0

68.1
15.9
5.0
3.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.5
1.0
100.0

Two-Hour
Posted
50.0
11.1
5.6
16. 7
5.6
5.5

o.o

0.0
5.5
100.0

10 and 15
Minute
Meters
71.5
21.4

o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o

7.1
100.0

Private
Lots

Public
Lots

Unrestricted
Spaces

11.5
13.6
6.2
5. 2 .
3.1
13.6
6.2
5.2
35.4
100.0

. 10.9··
4.3
4.4
8. 7..
6.5
, 15. 2
13. 0
.. 6.5
30.5
100.0

43.4
16.7
10.0
3.3

o.o

3.3
6.7
3.3
6.7
100.0

Survey by Harland Bartholomew and Associates,
December 29, 1964

Two-hour posted, two-hour metered in summer.

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 31 of the central business district. This study was carried out
during the peak sKi season in 1964. A sample of all types of
parking within the central area was checked every one-half
hour and license numbers were recorded as part of the turnover
survey. Results of this survey are shown in Table 7.
Concurrently, an accumulation survey was made in which every parked
vehicle within the study area was recorded every hour every
day.
The information on this survey is shown in the following:
Time Period
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00

Vehicle
Accumulation
355
448
472
4~

435
478
445
~4
354
2W

The accumulation of vehicles recorded on December 29 and
December 30 were increased by a factor of 1.3 to produce the
foregoing estimates of vehicle accumulation during the average
summer day.
A peak accumulation occurred at 2:00 in the afternoon with a total of 478 vehicles, which represented 66.5 percent of the total 720 available spaces. The next highest peak
was found at 11:00 in the morning with 472 spaces occupied. In
view of the fact that 289 spaces (or 40 percent) are private
spaces, this indicates that all available public space was
occupied during the peak period of accumulation. These
figures are only estimates of summer accumulation and, on
many days during the summer, these figures are exceeded. The
highest recorded peak period during the actual time of the
survey was 368 vehicles at 2:00 p.m. compared to 153 vehicles
at 6:00 p.m., which is the lowest recorded parking accumulation.
The percentage of vehicles parking by time periods is
shown in Table 7 for one-half hour periods up to four hours or
more.
Similar to most communities, a greater percentage of the
parking is taking place on the metered curb spaces for one hour
or less.
As shown on Table 7, 80 percent of the parkers in the
two-hour metered spaces are remaining for one-half hour or less
and 93 percent are parking for one hour or less.
Similarly, in
the two-hour posted spaces, 68 percent are parking for one-half
hour or less and nearly 16 percent remain for one hour or less.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

- 32 On private lots, parking periods are for _longer times, with
only 25 percent remaining parked for one hour or less and
over 35 percent staying_ for four hours or more.
Parking in
the pu_b lic lots is also more on a long-term basis; only 15
percent utilized ·spaces for one hour or less and 30 percent
remained for over four hours. · This turnover survey definitely
indicates a very high demand for short-term parking as is evidenced by the use of the existing two-hour meters and two-hour
posted spaces at the curbs.
Also, there is no significant
amount of long-term public parking available within the business area.
The maximum accumulation of 478 vehicles in the central
area essentially represents the existing demand for parking
space.
This total of 478 occupied spaces must be increased
by approximately 15 percent for vacancy to allow time for entering and leaving spaces. Therefore, an additional 72 spaces
must be added to the actual demand, producing a total parking
demand of 558 sp·a ces within the study area.
The present population of 2,568 in 1960 is expected to nearly double by 1985.
The present parking demand can be expected to increase approximately two times, producing a 1985 parking demand for 1,100
spaces.
The distribution of new parking spaces, based upon the
turnover study, should be as follows; for every 100 parking
spaces, there should be 41 one-hour spaces, 11 one to two
hour spaces, 17 two to four hours spaces, and 31 spaces for
four hours or more.

1 Hour
or Less

1 to
2 Hours

2 to
4 Hours

Over
4 Hours

Total

Percent Parked

80.7

7.6

6 •.4

5.3

100.0

Average Length
of Time Parked

0.6

1.7

3.2

7.0

Space Hours Parked
Per 100 Cars Parking

48.4

12.9

20.5

37.1

118.9

Spaces Required Per
100 Cars Parking

41

11

17

31

100

Of the existing 720 total parking spaces, approximately · 52 of
every 100 spaces should be used for one hour and one to two
hour parking space, for a total of 374 spaces. At the
present time, there are only 253 spaces that are restricted

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

-

33 -

to two hours or less. Further, any elimination of curb park•
ing spaces along Main
Street through changes from angle parking to parallel parking and the elimination of any parking
spaces on Court Avenue, would further increase the immediate
demand.
It is therefore estimated that there should be an
additional 200 off-street parking spaces provided within the
business district within the next few years to meet current
demand. A total of 600 public parking spaces should be provided by 1985.
Development Plan for the Business District
The plan for the Gaylord business district contemplates
a gradual rebuilding and rehabilitation of the area into a
more compact shopping and big business center with improved
appearance, adequate parking, a functional street system, and
planned pedestrian circulation.
(See Plate 7.) It is a - longrange plan designed to be carried out in stages; it is one
that will take a number of years for realization. The plan
will basically require revitalization of buildings, the development of several public parking lots, and some very minor
street vacations for pedestrian malls.
Land Use Development
Fundamental to the proposed plan for the district is the
rebuilding of a large, central core area consisting of an area
generally bound by the New York Central Railroad tracks on the
west, Mitchell Street on the north, Center Avenue on the east,
and Second Street on the south.
Many of the existing buildings
within this area would be rehabilitated; others would be removed and replaced with parking facilities and commercial structures.
As the community grows and the estimated population
reaches 4,700 persons, this rebuilding and replacement will become more feasible.
The plan contemplates a concentration of
commercial development along Main Street from Center Avenue to
the New York Central Railroad tracks, with a pedestrian northsouth orientation along Court Avenue from Second Street to
Huron Street extended.
The plan includes several suggested pedestrian malls within the area as shown on Plate 7. These are only a general application of the mall concept as a part of the long-range proposal. The malls are placed along the vacation of Court Avenue.
A mall would run from Main Street north to a large series of
public off-street parking lots north of the building frontages
on Main Street. A second pedestrian mall would run south from

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

34 -

Main Street to First Street along the east edge of the proposed new city-county building. The third mall would run a
short distance south of First Street within the Court Avenue
right-of-way to a second proposed building of unique design.
The building to the north and the building to the south along
this pedestrian mall would act as focal points along this main
pedestrian access.
The third mall would provide access to a
large proposed public parking area along the south side of
First Street.
The plan envisions the gradual rebuilding of existing
buildings within the area and encourages the gradual development of buildings along the Tyrolean architectural - theme. The
same type of architectural concept should be applied to the
proposed city-county building in a subdued manner, and in a
more elaborate manner to the buildings at the north and south
axis of the proposed pedestrian malls. The existing . and proposed general locations for building groups are shown on
Plate 7.
Primarily, it is expected that commercial activity will
be centered along Main Street and to a lesser degree along _.
Otsego Avenue, the Court Avenue mall, and First Street.
If
additional commercial space is needed within the central area,
the properties along the north side of Second Street between
Court Avenue and Center Avenue conceivably could be used for
special commercial facilities.
No significant changes are proposed in the street system
for the central business area other than the vacation of Court
Avenue.
It is recommended that Main Street, First Street, and
Second Street function as important east-west circulatory
streets within the business area.
Similarly, Otsego Avenue
and Center Avenue would provide major north-south circulation.
A major change proposed for traffic within the central area
would be providing increased capacities for Main Street.
It
is recommended that Main Street be changed to four moving lanes
with two parallel parking lanes.
It would also be possible to
provide for ten-foot left turning lanes by eliminating parking
at the intersections with Center and Otsego Avenues.
Main
Street would provide four moving lanes through the entire central area from Elm Avenue to Interstate Highway 75.
To further reduce future through traffic on Main Street,
Old Highway 27 should by-pass the central core area by directing through traffic entering the business area on the north
to Center Avenue, south to Second Street and then westerly along
Second Street to Otsego Avenue.
This would require improved
paving along this four block by-pass section for two moving
lanes of traffic.

�J

I

/

.

~
~

D

D
~

EXISTING BUILDING
G~OUPS TO fZ.tMAI N
PR.OPOSED BUILDINGS

.

.

. . .. .
. . . . . ... .

.

.

.

.

.

-.~:-:-t·&gt;-~'
.I
- ··.·

.

....... . .
. .

) T.

MITCHELL

,..----- - -

.

. . . .

::&gt;

..... . .

.i:\:~·_;-_·t;_ ·c~ ·- _· . -· .·.-.-·_-: ·. :~
. . . . ·_· .· · - ~ ---- · ~L

I&lt;&lt; : ::
.

.

.

-------..,_

..

. . ' : .... ...... .- ..

~

.

. ... ...
.
.
_j

·piJicic----PAP-..¥--111·G&lt;-

lLl

._:-_· ·. -~3'~.;-: @_·. _·..· ._·. ·_..

PfZ.OPOS cD C.I TY COUNTY E&gt;UILDING
RJSI DtNTI AL Al\.tAS
OPEN SPACES

I

PI\.OPOStD PE-DfSTKIAN MALLS

U51DtNTIAL

!L

(.________
I

So AN6Lt SPACES CMN6to
o PM.ULEL SPACES

~

GITY PLAN
6J..YLOP--.D,

fr

-~~~~j ~::;=;i ~=~~~~-:;,

-----

C.OM/t\lS':&gt;ION
MIC.~16AN

·* "34 · co·ir&gt; ·.- )P-A &lt;is··.·:

l.O'.i1_·.1o·SUJE1.·.VAUH

f

·$OUrn
.. ~0\11.1
. .·4-.
..
. . . -or:
. . . M. IN
. . . . . . . . . . .. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .

0

"'

sT.

fl~ST

..J

S

r

&lt;t"

a/.

. .

1-lU.. Lli.ND eio.. rnoLOMEW AIJD ASSOCIAHS
e, rTY PLANNf~S. llVIL tN61Hf-t"-S, WIPSCAPE ARCU/TECTS
SAINT WUIS, MIS'&gt;OUP-..l,
MA.Y
19U,

rose o. ·Ntw·

z

.. . .. .

:

ci. .l.L'r¥
. . . · S~OP~
.

·.. .1\ -E. ·_y . ·,

·-s:1-0:tN·T1
·.. .·:. ·. ·. ·.
J

./

71 \~-~____::--_

••••

l:-.,...,.-''--;:::- ----'-:i&gt;lh---dllfr.--'-t :~:l:a'"t:.....:.~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~d .~i;-__:]~,,/J~....J_/

------ - - - - - -- t - _,

--+~~--------.~~
, ,

- $ -~

f)LJSINESS

~

• ---

;

fia; -a

DI STf(I CT

. ... . .
. . : . ..

•♦

-D-f N°t"l· kl-

••••••

•

••

•

•

•

••

•

•

••

..... .

. ...... . . . .
...... . . . . . . .

Sl

11

I r

PLAN

PLATE 7

�I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

- 35 -

The development plan would provide an extensive system
of off-street parking facilities within the central area. Many
of these parking facilities can be provided in the areas that
are presently vacant; however, in order to make the parking
accessible and usable to the retail uses, it will be necessary
to gradually acquire existing commercial and residential structures.
The proposed parking areas are fairly well distributed
throughout the area so that there is an equal amount of parking throughout all parts of the area.
Proposed parking area A is located in the northwest section and would provide for a total of 76 spaces. This would
require very little demolition of existing buildings for this
public parking area. By far, the largest parking area would
consist of all the off-street spaces in public parking area B.
This area extends north from the buildings on Main Street,
from Otsego Avenue to Center Avenue, and would provide for a
total of 370 parking spaces. The service alleys north of
Main Street would be retained in the plan.
Court Avenue would
not be connected with this proposed parking facility but would
be provided with a cul-de-sac for the residential uses to the
north.
Access to this large parking area would be accomplished
with two entrances from Otsego Avenue and two entrances from
Center Avenue. Parkers would be able to circulate through the
entire area with two-way traffic on all access drives.
The
third major parking area is shown south of First Street between
Center Avenue and the vacated Court Avenue. This consists of
the existing city parking lot which would be enlarged to provide for a total of 170 parking spaces. Additional parking
facilities are shown in the plan through a combination of public or private spaces in the block bounded by Main, Center,
First, and Court Streets. Also, additional parking facilities
are recommended to the west along the New York Central Railroad
tracks south of Main Street.
There are presently 420 on-street parking spaces within
the study area; of these, 370 spaces would be retained in the
plan, as well as 300 existing off-street spaces.
The proposed
plan would provide for a total of 600 public off-street spaces,
with 170 of the private spaces retained.
There would be a
total of 770 off-street spaces in the plan. The 370 retained
curb spaces and the proposed 750 off-street spaces would provide for a total of 1,120 parking spaces.
This plan meets the
1985 estimated demand for approximately 1,100 parking spaces
within the central area.

-

~

--

---==

�I
I

-

37 -

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

I
I

Community facilities in the form of parks, schools, and
public buildings are integral parts of the physical structure
of every community. They have a very definite influence on
the community's appearance and livability, providing not only
essential open spaces but often serving as focal points for
community activities of all kinds. The availability and adequacy of various public utilities are a definite measure of
the qua~ity and the desirability of a community.
Existing Community Facilities
The existing community facilities within the City of
Gaylord have been developed over a period of many years. The
present system of parks, schools, public buildings, and underground utilities have been developed by separate groups at
varying periods of time, resulting in a relatively unrelated
system of facilities within the city.
Park and Recreational Facilities
Although there .are a number of recreational facilities
within Otsego County ·at the present time, only one park area
has been developed within the City of Gaylord. This consists
of a two-acre park located on the south side of Fourth Street
adjacent to the Gaylord community schools.
This park is a
small, wooded, pleasant park but . does not provide any facilities. Although there are many recreational outlets for the
population of Gaylord, there are no close-in recreational
spaces. There. is one nine-bole golf course open to the general public just ioµth of the city on Old Hiihway 27. Both
Otsego County and the State of Michigan operate parks on
Otsego Lake, however, they . are primarily __canip1.ng areas. The
City of Gail6rd has a totally inadequate park and recreational
program, even for a community of its size. · A .de_termined effort must be made to develop a ·'proper park system in the future.
School Facilities
The Gaylord _Community School District is _one of the
larger school districts within the county and provides both
elementary and secondary education. The district operates
one school site located within the City of Gaylord, generally
on the south side of Fourth Street and east of Elm Avenue.
The present facilities include an elementary school, which was
built in 1957 and enlarged in 1964. Grades K-6 are taught in
24 classrooms within this school. The school has a total capacity for 720 students, compared to a 1964-1965 enrollment

�- 38 of 658 students•.
This represents an enrollment under-capacity
of 62 students. Also located on the 40-acre site is the
school district's junior and senior high school. Major additions were made in 1964 to the building, which was originally
constructed in 1951. Both the junior grades, -7 through 9, and
senior grades 10 through 12 are taught in the school's 32
classrooms. This facility has a total capacity for 960 students, compared to a present enrollment of 509 showing an excess capacity within this school for 451 students.
The trends in public school enrollments in the Gaylord
School District over the past ten years are shown in the following table:
Year
1951-52
1955-56
1956-57
1957-58
1958-59
1959-60
1960-61
1961-62
1962-63
1963-64
1964-65

I

I

I

I
I

K-6

Grades
7-8
9-12

K-12

452
504
486
491
524
566
561
663
675
674
658

104
130
141
120
126
153
156
153
131
153
177

204
224
205
210
256
283
302
333
315
336
332

760
858
832
821
906
1005
1019
1149
1121
1163
1187

School enrollments have increased nearly every year since the
1951-1952 school year, from 760 in the 1951-52 school year to
1,187 in the 1964-65 school year.
A fairly uniform increase
in enrollment has taken place in all grades - elementary, junior, and senior. Elementary enrollments have increased from
452 to 658 during the 10-year period. Similarly, junior enrollments have increased fr6m 104 to 177, and senior enrollments
have increased from 204 to 332. This represents a 25 percent
increase in elementary enrollments, a 73 percent increase in
junior enrollments, and a 58 percent increase in senior high
school enrollments during the past 10 years.
Projections of future school enrollments indicate a total
of 2,400 students for the entire county, an increase of 600
students over the current county-wide enrollments.
It is expected that the Gaylord Community School District will receive
a greater part of these increased school enrollments, or approximately 520 additional students.
It is estimated that elementary enrollments in grades K-6 will represent 59 percent of the
enrollment, grades 7 and 8 will represent 60 percent of the

�I
I
I
I
I
,I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

39 -

enrollment, and grades 9 through 12 will represent 25 percent
of the total enrollment. This breaks down to an increase over
current enrollments within the Gaylord Community School District of 310 elementary students, 100 junior students, and
110 senior students.
The St. Mary's School in Gaylord currently has an enrollment of 610 students in grades 1 through 12.
If St. Mary's
enrollment increases at approximately the same. percentage rate
as the public schools, there would be approximately 200 additional students by 1985. The plans for public schools for the
Gaylord area assume that this increase will occur.
Public Buildings
The Gaylord Municipal Building is located on Court Avenue
across from the county courthouse. The structure was built in
1912 and remodeled in 1949. The building is used for all of
the city governmental offices including police, justice court,
the city library, and an auditorium seating about 600 persons.
Fire trucks formerly housed in this building were moved recently to a different building. The building is in fair to
good structural condition, but would require extensive remodeling to provide the space and services required by the city. The
city offices are located on the first floor in an extremely
small area totally inadequate to provide efficiently the necessary city services. A large area on the second floor is devoted to an infrequently used auditorium seating about 600 persons and to a library. The space formerly used by the fire
trucks is not being utilized at the present time. The Gaylord
fire hall is located on the northwest corner of Otsego Avenue
and Second Street, where the city's two fire trucks were moved
recently. The building location and facilities are adequate
to serve Gaylord and the surrounding area since the fire hall
has immediate access to Otsego Avenue. This thoroughfare, in
turn, provides immediate access to the central business area
and to the industrial areas on the south side of the city, in
addition to having access to Main Street for the east and west
sides of the city.
There are a number of other public buildings located within the City of Gaylord that would have a definite effect upon
public building planning for the City of Gaylord. The county
courthouse was built in 1891; additions and improvements were
made in 1948 and again in 1951. The building is in fair to
good structural condition.
It is considered inadequate for
present and future county needs. The United States post office in Gaylord is located on the business district on the
west side of Court Avenue. The building and site are relatively new, but both are too small to provide adequate services to the present and future population.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.

I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

- 40 The Otsego qounty Road Commission offices and garage
are located on Otsego Avenue south of the Gaylord business
district. The structure was built in 1940 and has major additions in 1964. The building is a modern facility, adequate
to meet the future needs of the road commission. The State
Conservation Department has a district office and central repair shop in two buildings on Otsego Avenue just north of the
County Road Commission building. The conservation department
also has a large storage yard adjacent to the road commission
storage yard. · Both ' of these operations are in a satisf~ctory
location in relation to developments in Gaylord. The Gaylord
State Police Post is located across the street from the conservation department building. These state and county functions are logically located within the city.
Community Facilities Plan
Long-range proposals for community facilities _. are . shown
on Plate 8. The community facilities plan proposed the utilmate development of three city parks, a new elementary school,
and considerable expansion of the sanitary sewer system and
water system. The various proposals are discussed in the
following:
Recreational Areas
The plan proposes the ultimate development of three recreational areas throughout the city. The present city park,
located on the south side of the city on Fourth Street, would
be expanded by approximately 30 acres. This park, the present
school site, and the proposed expansion area would provide a
total park area in excess of 70 acres. This park area would
be located on the proposed extension of Grandview Boulevard
into Hayes Road. This section of highway could be developed
in an attractive manner and would provide an excellent view
and appearance for this section of the city. This proposed
expansion area should contain a complete unit of . neighborhood
recreational facilities including playground equipment, hard
?urface courts, ball diamonds, and other active recreational
facilities.
A major feature of the recreation plan is a proposed 40acre educational and recreational site located on the west side
of Hayes Road. This site would serve as a location for a proposed elementary school and for city and county recreational
purposes.
It is recommended that the area be used as
neighborhood park for the area north of Main and east of the railroad tracks. This would include a complete contingent of
neighborhood recreational facilities similar to those proposed

a

�I
I
I

1 ·: ;.. .

-==.. .....

I

HIDDEN

7

y ·,Ul[Y
5KI
CLU &amp;

I
I
I

•
•
•
PROPOSED
I

FOR

SITE

CITY

E

PAR

AND

SCH
t 30 ACRES)

nr&lt;.tGO

COUNTY

Ala.POft.T'

ENDED
DDITION

COUQ.51{.

=1~~~g~4=::;=;===:J=

r
COMMUNITY

C.i'TY PHNN1NC, COMl•11S~ION
G AY~Ol0
t,,1 1(MIG'-N

FACILITIES

PLAN

-

PARKS, SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS
AND COURT HOUSE

D

ALL OTHER PUBLIC
PUBLIC USES
NEIGHBORHOODS

.._

NAlLAfllD IAl1HOtOw t w AND ,UJOCl,.TU
c:11••1•••1u.
Cl•llMA
l116&lt;
l• ·•~c,..,uo111Kn
1..iU lOl,111
Y •11U.
1. ' 4
111 11101,t•

AND

5EM I-

PLATE

8

�I

I
I
I

•
•

- 41 for the park to the south.
In addition, it is recommended
that this area be developed as a major athletic field for the
entire county, providing a large track, stands, field house
facilities within the elementary school, lighted ball diamonds,
tennis courts, and other bard surface courts for a complete
range of outdoor athletic facilities.
So as to properly serve the residential areas on the west
side of Gaylord, it is recommended that a 10-acre park be developed.
This area would be developed primarily with neighborhood facilities similar to those of the south neighborhood
park and the proposed neighborhood park on Hayes Road; equipment should include playground apparatus, a ball diamond, and
other such active recreational facilities.
Public Schools
A consolidated county-wide school district was proposed
as a part of the Otsego County Comprehensive Plan. The plan
recommended that the Gaylord High School serve as a county-wide
senior high school and that the other Gaylord, Johannesburg,
and Vanderbilt schools provide only elementary and junior high
education. Projections for public schools indicate that there
will be an additional 300 elementary students by 1985, meaning
that the Gaylord schools will have approximately 950 elementary students. This is too large an enrollment for one elementary school; therefore, the plan recommends that a second
elementary school be built in the proposed site on Hayes Road.
This new school would also be in an area where considerable
population growth is anticipated.
The junior and senior high school facilities would be contained in the present junior and senior facilities in the
Gaylord community school site. Total enrollment at the high
school would be approximately 900 students, including the
Gaylord junior high school students and the county-wide senior
high school students.
The county comprehensive plan recommended that consideration be given to the establishment of a vocational school. The
population of Otsego County may not be large enough to support
such a facility, but the combined population of Otsego County
and several of the adjoining counties would be sufficient for
such support.
It was also suggested that Gaylord would be a
logical location for such a vocational school.
It is recommended that this facility be developed on the same site with
the junior and senior high school, with the vocational school
generally fronting on the proposed extension of Grandview
Boulevard •

�- 42 Proposed City-County Building

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

The present municipal building, the county courthouse and
the post office in Gaylord are considered to be functionally
obsolete and inadequate for their intended purposes.
In coordination with the Comprehensive Plan for Otsego County, the
Gaylord Comprehensive Plan recommends the development of a
city-county building, which would house all of the functions
of the present municipal building and the courthouse. A study
of space requirements indicates that the proposed building
should provide approximately 60,000 square feet of floor space
for all municipal and county functions.
If the space needs of
the building exceed 60,000 square feet, the jail or other
functions should be developed on another site. ·
The functions of the large, generally unusable courtroom
in the courthouse and the sizeable auditorium in the municipal
building could be combined into a new modern courtroom and
large meeting room in the new building.
In addition to this,
a smaller meeting room would be necessary for the Board of
Supervisors and the City Council meetings. At least one other
small meeting room should be made available to serve the needs
of both the city ~nd the county. The library should also be
located in this building. It is expected that fire protection
equipment would remain in the present fire hall. In general,
complementary functions such as the sheriff and city police
should be able to achieve a better degree of cooperation by
being located in the same building. The combination of both
city and county offices would enable a dual utilization of
space, permitting a more efficient operation of both governments than could be realized in the present old buildings.
The plan strongly recommends construction of a new citycounty building on the present site of the county courthouse.
Unique advantages of the site include its location in the
Gaylord central business district, making the building convenient to those people in the area of greatest activity in
the county; its positive effect of bringing additional people
into the business area who may shop while attending to other
affairs; and its possession of an open green area. The open
space lends a special attractiv·eness to the business area,
giving it a unique and exquisite characteristic : lacking in
many other central districts.
One possible disadvantage in using the site in this manner is that the area could provide space for additional parking and business. This is a minor consideration however because of the inherint aesthetic value of the open space. The
development of this site for business use might even prove to
be a detriment to the business area since the district would
then lose one of its best features. A summary of existing and
proposed community facilities is shown in Table 8.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 43 Table 8
EXISTING AND PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Gaylord, Michigan

Area of Site in Acres
Existing
Proposed
Total

Type of
Facility

Year
Built

Use of
Facility

Municipal
Building

1912
(1949)

Offices,
Auditorium,
Library and
Police

0.1

Site to be
abandoned

Post Office

1952

U. s. Post
Office

0.1

0.1

Courthouse

1891

County
Offices

2.1

2.1

Proposed
City-County
Building

Fire Hall

City and
County
Offices,
Auditorium,
Library,and
Police
1935

City Park

Use the present
Courthouse site

Houses two
fire trucks

0.3

0.3

Passive park
with no
facilities

2.0

2.0

Gaylord
Elementary

1957
(1964)

24 Classrooms

Gaylord High

1951
(1964)

32 Classrooms

On same site
as above

Proposed City
Park &amp; School
Site on Hayes
Road

A complete
athletic field
and elementary
school

40.0

40.0

Propes ed West
Neighborhood
Park

Recreational
facilities

10.0

10.0

40.0

30.0

70.0

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

-

45 -

REGULATORY MEASURES
Zoning Regulations
The control of land use through zoning is a vital portion of city planning if the community is to avoid a chaotic
pattern of intermingled residential, commercial, and industrial uses.
Land use and the intensity of development form
the basic community pattern; their harmonious relationship is
an essential beginning step in the creation of a satisfactory
city.
Gaylord bas enjoyed the protection and guidance afforded
by comprehensive zoning since 1946. The present ordinance has
been amended in some minor respects, but it essentially has remained unchanged since adoption.
The basic objectives of zoning have not substantially changed in recent years, even though
there have been improvements in zoning techniques and a broader
legal support for some of the aspects of zoning. Zoning is
still concerned with three types of regulations; namely, the
use of land and buildings, the amount of open space that must
be provided around buildings, and the maximum height of buildings.
Although modern ordinances generally require the provision of space for off-street parking, this requirement is
closely associated with the provision of front, side, and rear
yards.
Practically all ordinances also regulate the intensity
of land use and buildings or the density of population by specifying the number of families that may occupy a lot of acertain size.
Gaylord's zoning ordinance was authorized under an Enabling
Act adopted by the State Legislature. Act 207, which is still
in effect with little or no modification since its original
passage, is similar in most respects to zoning enabling legislation adopted by other states. The language of the act clearly
defines the major principles that should be considered when preparing and adopting a zoning ordinance.
The original zoning ordinance in Gaylord was prepared without the benefit of a plan for future land use.
Such a plan has
been prepared as a part of the current program in Gaylord, and
the zoning ordinance will be a principal means of impiementing
and carrying out this plan.
For that reason, if for no other,
it is necessary to prepare a new zoning ordinance based upon
up-to-date information, the provisions of the land use plan,
and the newer techniques that have been developed in recent
years.
Zoning is accomplished by dividing the community into districts such as residential, commercial and industrial.

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

-

46 -

The first pur~ose of zoning is to direct the growth of
the community in accordance with a comprehensive plan.
Since
the use of urban land is dependent upon the arrangement of
such physical facilities -as highways, schools, and parks, the
zoning regulations sho~ld · b~ a part of a plan dealing with all
of these facilities.
Under a good zoning ordinance, urban
growth will arrange itself according to a pattern of land use
that will fit into a comprehensive plan, resulting in maximum
benefit to the entire county. There is a close relationship
between the ·land use arrangement and the provision of needed
public facilities such as schools. For example, it is most
difficult to design a highway system in the absence of a general plan. The land use plan provides the basis for the
zoning district map.
The second purpose of zoning is to encourage the most
appropriate use of land. Zoning must be reasonable. The future use of property permitted must be related to the existing
development.
In drafting an ordinance, consideration must be
given to the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses. Of greatest importance, however,
is the necessity for the regulations to encourage the most appropriate use of land. The zoning regulations should be based
upon the· interests of the entire community - of all the people rather than upon the value or use of one or two individual
pieces of land. Zoning is more than just a few rules to keep
one man from unduly damaging the value of his neighbor's property.
It is a directive force to encourage the development of
the best possible community.
The third purpose of zoning is to provide adequate light
and air, to prevent over-crowding of the land, and to avoid
undue concentration of population. · This is not too difficult
a problem in Otsego County.
The fourth purpose of zoning is to conserve and protect
property values. For example, in a residential area a few
lots might bring a much higher price if they could be used for
commercial purposes. Such a use, however, would depreciate
rather than conserve the value of the existing buildings in
the particular area.
When there is no zoning to prevent each individual from
doing just as he pleases with his property, the different
types of land use - residence, industry and commerce - become
intermingled, damaging one another and the community as a
whole. No one wants to build a residence or summer home and
then find the adjacent lot used as a soap factory or as a junk
yard.
While this is a most extreme example, there is no question but that industrial or commercial use adversely affects

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

47 -

-

•

•
•

adjacent residential property.
In addition, one type of residential property has an adverse effect on another. For example, when a single-family lake residential area is invaded by
some rental cottages, the value of the single-family area for
its original purpose is reduced because, over a long period,
rental property depreciates at a faster rate than does owneroccupied property.
Existing Ordinance
As previously stated, Gaylord adopted its present zoning
ordinance in 1946. The ordinance divides the city into eight
districts:
three residential districts, one agricultural district, three commercial districts, and one industrial district.
Within each of the several districts, the use of land and
buildings is regulated, minimum setbacks are established for
front yards, and minimum rear and si_d e yards are required.
Minimum lot areas and dimensions are specified, but there are
no height regulations; this omission indicates that the ordinance is not fully comprehensive.
In addition to the use and
area regulations, the ordinance sets out certain definitions,
adopts the zoning map by reference, and describes how district
boundaries are to be interpreted. The ordinance also provides
for enforcement of the ordinance and creates a Board of Appeals.
The present ordinance does not truly provide the desirable
controls under present-day conditions. There have been many
changes in land uses since the ordinance was adopted, and these
changing trends should be recognized.
Specifically, the following deficiencies are noted:
1.

Definitions of terms should be expanded to recognize certain new types of land use such as clinics,
modern filling stations, off-street parking and
loading spaces, motels, nursing homes, and trailers.

2.

The "R-211 and "R-3" Residential Districts are
nearly identical and do not materially assist in
providing purposeful zoning controls. The "H-1"
and "H-2" Highway Service Districts are also nearly
identical.

3.

The area and yard regulations are scattered throughout the ordinance, in Article IV, and in the various
use districts •

4.

The ordinance does not have a section on compliance
with the regulations to make the requirements of the
ordinance clearly mandatory •

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

•

•II

- 48 -

5.

The resid~ntial districts permit certain types
of institutions and other uses that should only
be allowed by special use permit.

6.

The ordinance does not contain a special use
section to provide for the proper location of
unusual land uses such as cemeteries, trailer
parks, junk yards, and similar problematic
uses that should be reviewed prior to their
establishment.

7.

The uses permitted in the various districts
are not well selected and do not properly relate to one another. Also, certain commercial
uses such as retail stores, are not permitted
in the "H-1" or "H-2" Highway Service districts.

8.

The ordinance is deficient in not requiring offstreet parking to be provided in all districts
other than in the central business district.

The above are the principal defects of the present ordinance and, while they could be remedied by amending the present
ordinance, there are so many changes which should be made the
piecemeal amendment procedure would be very cumbersome.
It is
concluded that it would be far better to draft and adopt an
entirely new ordinance than to attempt to amend the present
one.
Proposed Zoning Regulations
The text and district maps of a proposed zoning ordinance
were submitted in the preliminary report. The proposed ordinance was coordinated and patterned to the regulations for
Otsego County. The purpose of the ordinance is to establish
controls on the use of land, the size of lots, front, side and
rear yards, a minimum dwelling size, and parking space. The
zoning ordinance consists of written text and a zoning district
map.
(See Plate 9.)
The intent of the ordinance is to insure the general orderly growth of the city, to insure proper development in the
future, to protect the values of land and property, and to assure the most appropriate use of land.
Districts.
follows:

The city is divided into five districts as
R-1
R-2
C-1
C-2
M-1

Single-Family Residence
Multiple Residence
General Commercial
Central Commercial
Manufacturing

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

H I D D (

I\,.

VALLEY

OTSlGO

COUNTY

AIRPOltT

- .2 ,

::

.L::-----,
'

-

--1

- -

-

••

•
•
•

ZONING
D
•

D\STR\CT

NONCONFORMING
NONCONFORMING

MAP

COMMERCIAL USES
INDUSTRIAL USES
PLATE 9

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

•
•
•
•
•
•

-

49 -

Use Regulations. The R-1 Single-Family Residence District permits single-family dwellings and certain other compatible uses such as schools, parks, churches, and home occupations. The R-2 Multiple Residence District permits the uses
allowed in R-1, plus two family and multiple dwellings, clubs,
and hospitals. The C-1 General Commercial District allows
almost all types of commercial uses, including retail service
and office uses, drive-in establishments, parking facilities
and signs. The C-2 Central Commercial District applies only
to the central business area.
Permitted uses are the same as
in the C-2 District, plus wholesale establishments and terminals
and limited manufacturing. This district is exempted from
parking requirements.
The M-1 Manufacturing District allows
any type of commercial or industrial use (with the exception
of Council review of certain obnoxious uses). Residential uses
are prohibited.
Special Uses.
The City Council and the planning commission may permit by special permit, cemeteries, drive-in theaters, golf courses, institutions, trailer parks, and junk yards
in certain districts where they are not regularly allowed.
Area Regulations.
All new buildings in every district
must have a minimum front yard of 25 feet except in the C-2
District. Rear yards of 25 feet and side yards of five to
ten feet are required, depending upon the district.
Side
yards are not necessary in the C-1 and C-2 districts, except
where they abut an R District.
A minimum lot of 8,500 square
feet and minimum lot width of 60 feet are required for singlefamily residential uses in the Rand C districts. Two-family
dwellings must provide 2,500 square feet and 1,500 square feet
is required for each multiple unit. Every dwelling unit is
required to have a minimum ground floor area of 480 square
feet.
These area regulations do not apply to existing buildings.
The ordinance also contains provisions for making reasonable adjustments to these regulations where there are unusual existing conditions. These area regulations are minimum
standards; larger lots and yards, of course, are permitted.
Any lot existing at the present time, regardless of size, may
be used as only new lots must observe these minimum areas .
Height. The height of all new buildings must not exceed
two and one-half stories or 35 feet in all districts, except
in the C-2 and M-1 districts where the maximum height is eight
stories or 100 feet for new buildings. These regulations do
not apply to existing buildings •
Board of Appeals.
Appeals may be made to an Appeal Board
for errors or for hardships.
All new buildings or additions
to existing buildings must obtain a permit. Permit fees are

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

•
•

- 50 $3.00 for improvements up to $2,000 in valuation, and $0.50
for each additional $1,000 valuation. Any improv·ement under
$200 has no fee.
Amendments. The City Council may amend and change the
zoning ordinance and the district maps. Before any amendment
may be made, the proposed amendment must be submitted to the
planning commission for its consideration and a public hearing.
The amendment procedure is the same as that used in adopting
the ordinance.
Subdivision Regulations
Any physical expansion of a community is primarily accomplished by the development of new subdivisions of land. The
process of platting new streets, blocks and lots establishes
a pattern which firmly attaches itself to the land and thereafter is difficult to change or alter. Therefore, it is essential that the process of subdividing land be subject to reasonable public regulations and control so that the pattern of
development is properly related to the overall community plan.
The procedure will protect the interes~ .of the prospective
purchaser, the developer , and the city. The creation of new
subdivisions often offers opportuniti~s for implementing various proposals of the comprehensive plan such as the location
of major thoroughfares and sites for schools, parks, and other
public facilities.
Subdivision Planning
Subdivision regulations are one of the most important
tools available to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Gaylord
and to assure orderly growth in the community. The City of
Gaylord has the authority to control the subdivision of land
in the corporate limits and within the unincorporated territory,
as established in Michigan Statutes.
The planning commission is vested with the responsibility
of reviewing new subdivisions.
This power of review is established through the adoption and enforcement of subdivision
regulations by the City Council.
Subdivision regulations are
concerned with standards of design, standards of minimum physical improvements, the procedures to be followed, and information required to be shown on a preliminary and final plat.
It
is in the public interest to require that the developer provide
certain minimum physical improvements in accordance with applicable standards of the city to prevent premature placement
of public facilities and excessive maintenance costs, as well
as to safeguard the public health and interes t .
·

�- 51 -

I
I

-I
I

•I
I

I
I
I
I
I

Upon adoption , of the subdivision regulation ordinance by
the City Council, the planning commission will be required to
review each new subdivision.
This offers an excellent opportunity for the city to apply sound planning principles in the
development of areas.
It is important that specific standards be available to use in appraising the merit of each proposal.
The creation of a new subdivision is usually the first
step in the development or the expansion of a residential
neighborhood. As each parcel of land is developed, it should
be oriented to the neighborhood and must become an integral
part of it. The land use plan bas identified several neighborhoods in Gaylord, the focus of which is upon a combined
elementary school and neighborhood park.
Future streets within the neighborhood should be so arranged as to discourage
through traffic. Whenever physically possible, major streets
should border the neighborhood rather than penetrate it.
In
this way, pedestrians are protected from the dangers of vehicular traffic and residences are protected from the noise, dust
and nuisance of through traffic. Attention should be given to
the location of churches, clubs, lodges, public buildings, and
public and semi-public open spaces.
If these are located in
the neighborhood, they should be provided with large sites,
and the buildings shou l d be insulated from surrounding residences with adequate setback for landscaping.
Certain basic principles of planning standards should be
observed whether a proposed subdivision is built by a single
developer or by many separate developers over a period of years.
Attention should be given to the physical characteristics of
the topography of the area under consideration. Natural features should be preserved. Minor streets should enter major
streets at right angles to avoid traffic hazards.
Whenever
possible, streets should follow main drainage lines. Dead-end
streets should be avoided, except where needed to connect to
a future development of adjacent property.
Lots should be
adjusted to obtain maximum frontage on existing and proposed
open spaces.
Proposed Subdivision Regulations
The text of the proposed subdivision regulations were
submitted in the preliminary report.
The proposed ordinance
was coordinated and patterned to the regulations prepared for
Otsego County. This proposed ordinance sets out in detail
the procedures for the subdivision of land. After careful review by the planning commission, the recommended regulations
should then be prepared in proper legal form by the City Attorney for adoption by the City Council.

�II
II
II

-II

II

I

II

- 52 -

The City Engineer is the official responsible for administration of the subdivision ordinance, and the ordinance
provides that copies of the preliminary plan be filed with
him.
A public hearing before the planning commission is then
scheduled. The City Engineer submits a report upon the preliminary plan to the planning commission, and the commission
then approves, modifies or disapproves the plan.
Upon approval of the preliminary plan, the subdivider may
then prepare the final plat along with the detailed specifications for required improvements.
A performance bond is filed
with the final plat to insure that the required improvements
will be made. This performance bond is returned to the subdivider when the City Engineer certifies that the required
improvements have been made.
The ordinance prescribes minimum standards and requirements which are necessary for good subdivision design.
Such
items as minimum specifications for street and street arrangement, lot sizes, easements, and the like are included~ Additional requirements pertaining to land for parks are included.
When public property is to be provided, a time period is specified during which the appropriate agency may purchase the land.
The required improvements may be provided by the subdivider upon receiving a signed copy of the preliminary plan. The
required improvements include permanent markers, streets, sidewalks, water lines, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage.

I
I

Provision is made for maintenance or improvements outside
the corporate limits when the municipality is unable to maintain them or does not wish to do so. Deed restrictions will
insure that utility systems, park areas, trees and other necessary and desirable physical facilities will be cared for by lot
owners in the subdivision. The ordinance also contains sections
for general administration, on variations and exceptions, violations and penalties, validity and the repeal of conflicting
ordinances. The ordinance may be amended from time to time by
the City Council if this becomes necessary in the future.

�•
•

- 53 PUBLIC UTILITIES
Water is the most essential utility provided by the municipality with its direct impact on the health, commerce and general well-being of the citizens.
In addition to its primary
life-sustaining function, water is essential for sanitation,
commerce and industry, and for fire protection. The availability of an adequate and dependable wat~r supply often has a
great bearing on the growth and prosperity of a community.
The various facilities that make up a water system; supply
works, treatment facilities, pumping facilities, transmission
and distribution mains, storage facilities, hydrants, valves,
etc., represent a large long-term capital investment and, as
such, require careful long-range planning to provide adequate
service to an increasing population in the most economical manner.
A complete sanitary sewage system consists of facilities
for collection, pumping, treatment, and disposal of domestic
and industrial wastes. The problem of pollution of our natural
resources is finally beginning to receive the widespread concern that it has so long deserved. The urbanization trend and
increase in population necessitates the proper removal and disposal of domestic and industrial wastes to avoid any possibility
of wholesale contamination of water supply and resultant hazards
to the community health.
The primary function of an urban storm sewer system is to
reduce or eliminate accidents and property damage due to local
floods and water flooding.
Storm sewers also assist in the
maintenance of efficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian
traffic movement and eliminate the health and safety hazards
accompanying pooled water. Advance planning enables the city
to provide for increased storage run-off which is an inevitable
result of urban development. As more streets, parking lots,
and other relatively impervious features replace the original
undeveloped countryside, the percentage of run-off from a
given rainfall may increase as much as fivefold or possibly
more.
Existing Facilities
The City of Gaylord's existing water system consists of
two wells with high discharge head turbine pumps as sources of
supply; a distribution system ·of two, four, and six-inch mains;
and a 54,000 gallon elevated storage tank.
Maintenance facilities are located at the south well house. The north well

�- 54 -

I

I
I
I

located on Otsego Avenue consists of a 16-inch gravel packed
well with a high discharge turbine pump.
Under normal operation or auxiliary power, the well's capacity is 310 gallons
per minute. The south well is located on Center Avenue and
is a remodeled dug well with a high discharge head turbine
pump. From the best information available, it is estimated
that the well has a 350 gallon. per minute capacity. The existing storage tank located on south Center Avenue has a capacity for 54,000 gallons. Although adequate when originally
constructed, this tank does not satisfy the present needs of
the City of Gaylord. The distribution system is comprised of
six-inch wooden feeder mains along Center Avenue, Otsego Avenue, and Main Street. The feeder mains are connected by a
two a-n d four-inch distribution network. The distribution network is comprised of wood, cast iron, cement, asbestos, and
galvanized iron mains. Recent water main installations in the
new subdivisions consist primarily of four-inch cement asbestos
pipe.
The adequacy of the present distribution system is definitely substandard.
In the northwest section of the city,
which is beginning to develop into a residential area, there
has already been experiences of low pressure. The low pressure
is caused by attempting to supply too many people with a 4,000
foot long four-inch main. As with many old distribution systems, the City of Gaylord's network has developed many serious
leakage problems.
It is apparent from the report prepared on
"Water Supply, Distribution, and Storage", February, 1965, by
George E. Synder and Associates, that there are many inadequacies in the present water system of the City of Gaylord and
many improvements are needed to place the system in proper
order to serve the present population. As the community grows
in the future, additional facilities must be developed for
this new population.
Gaylord's sanitary sewer system p~ovides service to all
of the present urban development. The system flows by gravity
to the oxidation ponds and treatment facilities located in the
southeast corner oi the city. The system is connected to the
treatment facilities by a 14-inch trunk line which generally
follows Seventh Street and Court Avenue north to a point approximately one block north of Main Street. The collection
system is in three basic parts, with all the system east of
Elm connected to the 14-inch main at Fourth and the central
area east of the tracks connected at - multiple points with the
14-inch trunk line. The western collection network is also
connected to the 14-inch trunk main and_ crosses the railroad
tracks at Fourth Street. This westerly system has a pump
house on Main Street near Ohio Avenue. Nearly all of tbe local service lines are of an 8-inch size. Gradients are relatively low due to the level topography of the city.

�'-I
I
I
I
I

....
r,I

HIDDEN

"'::,

VALLEY

0

CLUE

5KI

..J
L--

-

0

--

~ -'"' ITO .,_ IU M

-

-

1

M-32.

"I
II
II
I

II
II
II
II

-

r-

i
OTSEGO

COUNTY

j
AIRPOR.T

JI: ·

ti

~ ~·E·~

,
=·

-

_-

~,•

1

--~ly .
••••••C

1-------------i

1t • \I

-

" "

•

; ]71---'-- - - i

Alt...EAS 5E~VED l)Y SE.WE~
AND WATE~ 5YSTEM5
-

r-----.1
e
0

AR..EAS PR..E.SE.NTLY StP--.YED ~y
SE.WE P-... AND WAT E. P-... LIN E. S.
AR..EAS TO ~E. SE!&lt;....VED l)Y St.WEil-..
A ND WA H I&lt;... L I N E5 I N TH I:. FllTU R..E. .
WATEP--.. STOil-AG!:. FACILITIES
SE.WE.GE TR..E.ATME.NT PLANT
PLATE 10

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 55 -

•

The storm drainage system in Gaylord does not provide
for proper removal of surface water.
A very limited and inadequate system of underground lines serves the central part
of the city, generally around the business district on Main
Street. A 14-inch line runs from the oxidation ponds to
Seventh Street. From Seventh Street, a 1O-inch line runs to
Fourth Street and a series of 8-inch lines connect with the
catch basins in the central business area.
Only five intersections on Main Street are provided with catch basins. All
other areas in the community are primarily served by surface
drainage facilities with storm water handled through curbs
and gutters, ditches, and by natural flow.
The level terrain
of the city is not suited to this type of a system. There
are frequent instances of ponding water throughout the city
following heavy rainfall or during periods of melting snow.
Therefore, the city faces a major improvement program if
proper storm drainage is to be provided.
Future Requirements

I

I
I

The master plan for Gaylord's water distribution system
calls for a three-phase development program. Phase I of the
program would consist of the replacement of all wood water
mains, construction of an elevated 300,000 gallon storage
tank, and the addition of one well. These improvements are
based upon the needs of the present population. The Phase II
improvements include the replacement of under-sized mains
(less than four inches in diameter) and the addition of several new mains to strengthen the distribution network.
These
proposed improvements are based upon the present needs of the
city; however, they are separated from Phase I to accommodate
financial considerations and implementation. The Phase III
improvements are designed to satisfy the requirements of the
future city. These improvements include the expansion of the
supply system, a 500,000 gallon elevated storage tank, and an
expanded distribution system.
Compact urban growth in and around Gaylord should be encouraged in accordance with the land use plan. One of the
reasons for this suggested type of development is to allow
for the economic and adequate provision of water supply to
the residential, commercial, and industrial areas.
The areas
presently served by the water system and the areas requiring
service in the future are illustrated on Plate 1O,as are the
areas requiring sanitary sewer service in the future.
The American Engineering Company has prepared some preliminary plans for the expansion of the sanitary sewer system
and for the development of an adequate storm sewer system.

�- 56 -

Relatively limited additional facilities are needed to complete the sanitary sewer system for present development. The
plans call for a proposed 10-inch sanitary sewer line to run
from the oxidation ponds westerly along Grandview Boulevard,
northerly along Wisconsin Street to Petoskey Street, and then
northerly along Ohio Avenue to North Street. This proposed
line would have a grade of 0.5 percent and would not require
pumping facilities.
Several other minor 8-inch line extensions are proposed in the plan. As future development takes
place, it will be necessary to extend the present sanitary
sewer system into these areas, primarily with 8-inch service
lines.
The majority of the areas requiring future service,
as shown on Plate 10,are to the northeast and northwest. The
area to the northeast may require added trunk line facilities
to the treatment plant; however, such a requirement would be
a number of years in the future.

I

The storm sewer system will require considerable improvement and the expenditure of large sums of money in the future.
The plan, as prepared by American Engineering Company, proposes
three main trunk lines serving three separate areas of Gaylord,
generally similar to the storm sewer service districts. A 66inch line would run from the treatment plant to Seventh Street.
A proposed 48-inch line would follow Center Street, extending
north to serve all of the areas east of Elm. A 54-inch line
would connect with the 66-inch line on Seventh Street and serve
all of the area in the central part of the city north to the
hospital. The developments west of the railroad tracks would
be connected by a 60-inch line and a 48-inch line with a crossing at Fourth Street. The smallest storm sewer in the proposed
system would be· 12-inch storm mains with a minimum gradient of
0.2 percent. The system is designed for a five-year frequency
and would be adequate to properly drain the present developed
areas of the city. As the residential areas to the northwest
and northeast develop, this system would have to be extended
into these areas. The system is designed so that it would be
adequate to handle the extensions into these areas in the
future.

�'

- 57 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The proposals in the Gaylord Comprehensive Plan are indeed expensive, for all the proposals are needed improvements.
It would be impossible for the city to finance them all within
the first few years. To effectuate the plan implementation
for maximum benefit according to a cost schedule which the
citizens of Gaylord can afford, it is necessary to determine
the priorities and estimated costs of the various proposed
projects and then prepare a financial plan for their development. The priorities schedule will assure the development of
the most · urgent improvements and, combined with the cost schedule, will assure a financial plan which Gaylord can afford.
Present hlunicipal Finances
Prior to the formation of a six-year capital improvement
program, it is necessary to review the past and present level
of municipal finance.
Such is the purpose of the following
text and tables.
The cost of government in the City of Gaylord has increased steadily in recent years. Total revenues increased
from $136,000 in 1960-61 to $166,000 in 1964-65. Property
taxes have been the greatest source of revenue for the city
over the years, representing 35 percent of total revenues in
1960 and 38 percent of total revenues in 1964. An important
source of revenue for the city is the returned taxes from the
state which generally represent nearly one-third of revenue
sources. In 1960-61, state motor vehicle tax returns were
$21,000 and increased to $27,000 in 1964-65. The sales tax
diversion increased from some $17,000 to $21,000 during this
same period of time. Trends in municipal revenues are shown
in Table 9.
Municipal expenditures are shown in Table 10 for the years
1960 through 1965. The expenditures have increased and paralled revenues, increasing from $147,000 in 1960-61 to $153,000
in 1964-65. General government and general street maintenance
are the categories that required the greatest expenditures of
money, each representing approximately 30 percent of total expenditures. As would be expected, police, fire, and sanitation and health are the next largest categories. During the
five-year period shown on Table 10,the costs of government in
Gaylord remained relatively uniform.
If the capital outlay
totals are subtracted, the costs of government have ranged
from $132,000 to $148,000, with an outlay of $147,000 in 1960
and an outlay of $148,000 in 1964-65. Although costs of

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-I
'I
'
''

- 58 -

Table 9
MUNICIPAL REVENUES
Gaylord, Michigan

1960-61

1961-62

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

$ 48,004

$ 58,249

$ 62,310

$ 62,894

$ 65,003

3,090

3,107

3,107

3,107

3,132

Sales Tax
Diversion

16 I 906

16,942

18,361

19 l 516

21,327

State Motor
Vehicle Tax

21,973

22,059

24,408

25,912

27,323

Liquor Licenses

1,993

1,974

2,010

2,549

2,517

Court Fines
(No Costs)

2,286

2,709

3,076

4,005

5,224

State Highway
Maintenance

8,069

12,550

9,084

6,946

10,841

All Other
Receipts

34,549

34,317

28,315

42,867

30,795

Total

$136,870

$151,907

$150,671

$167,796

$166,072

Property Taxes
Intangibles Tax

Source:

City Manager's Office

�-II
~

1:
I'
'
II
'
"
'-

Table 10
,1 ·

MUNICIPAL EXPENDITURES
Gaylord, Michigan

1960-61

1961-62

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

$ 38,842

$ 37,251

$ 40,919

$38,941

$ 42,624

19,201

19,909

20,335

18,598

21,171

5,586

. 3;951

.. 4,904

4,316

5,674

Sanitation
and Health

27,072

7,463

19,430

15,714

16,799

General Streets

38,616

45,531

39,790

38,874

41,611

Library

2,500

2,500

2,500

2,500

2,500

Parks and
Recreation

1,748

1,541

2,090

1,365

858

Cemetery

4,179

4,300

4,234

4,477

5,043

Street Lights

4,352

5,077

7,633

7,963

7,975

Public Works

4,699

4,122

3,781

4,030

4,536

18,628

15,456

25,633

3 2 935

$150,273

$161,072

$162,411

$152,726

General
Government
Police
Fire (Including
Hydrant Rental)

Capital Outlay
Total

Source:

$146,795

City Manager's Office

�•

- 60 governmental operation has increased as have other costs, the
cost of government has been held at a relatively uniform level.
Although the amount of revenue has increased during recent years, it is apparent that there will not be an excess of
revenues over expenditures for direct operation.
The costs
of general government, protection of persons and property, and
maintenance of streets are major financial requirements of the
community. Although revenues will continue to increase in the
future, it is expected that similar increases will take place
in the level of expenditures. This indicates that major public improvements in Gaylord can only be financed through the
issuance of obligation bonds.
The assessed valuation of Gaylord in 1960 was 4.8 million
dollars and has been increasing steadily during the past five
years.
In 1965, the total assessment for real and (Table 11)
personal property was 6.6 million dollars. The per capita
valuation has also increased steadily from $1,886 in 1960 to
$2,298 in 1965. The assessed valuation of property in the
city determines the amount of money that can be raised through
a given tax levy and the bonded indebtedness the city may incur. This indebtedness is set by the state statutes at 12
percent of equalized assessed valuation. Thus, assessed valuation largely determines the amount of income available to
the community for the development of public improvements.
In
Gaylord, the Charter states that the total bonded indebtedness
of the community is limited to 10 percent of the assessed valuation. Table 12 indicates the total assessed value for the
years 1960 through 1965. The estimated bonding power at 10
percent of assessed value is shown in the second column.
In
1960, the bonding power of the city was $484,000 and increased
to $659,000 in 1965, During this period of time, there have
been no general obligation bonds outstanding; thus; the estimated bonding limit of the city in 1965 is $659,000,
The total tax rate for residents of Gaylord has varied
considerably during the past six years as indicated in Table 13.
In 1960, the total tax rate was $38,00 per $1,000 of assessed
valuation (state equalized). The highest tax rate was in 1961
at $40.82; however, the rate was reduced in 1965 to $32.93 per
$1,000 of assessed valuation. Although there have been some
fluxtuations in the total tax rate, the tax rate for the city,
county and the school operating taxes have remained relatively
uniform. The greatest fluctuations are found in the tax rate
levied for the school debt which has ranged from $3.06 to
$6.14. The tax rate in Gaylord is relatively nominal and an
increase in this tax rate for the purposes of retiring general obligation bonds would not be unwarranted or excessive .

�- 61 -

Table 11
TRENDS IN ASSESSED VALUES
Gaylord, Michigan

I
I

Total
Property

Assessed Value
Per Capita

693,525

4,844,905

1,886

3,978,550

680,050

4,658,600

1,773

1962

4,250,750

723,250

4,974,000

1,850

1963

4,300,300

757,500

5,057,800

1,840

1964

4,480,700

826,850

5,307,550

1,890

1965

5,531,700

1,057,900

6,589,600

2,298

Year

Real
Property

1960

4,151,380

1961

Note:
Source:

Personal
Property

Estimated Population Increase - 60 per year
City Manager's Office

�I
I
I
I

- 62 Table 12

ESTIMATED ao·NDING LIMITS

I

-I
-I
II

-

Gaylord, Michigan .

Assessed
Value

Year

1960

$ 4,844.905

1961

4,658,600

466,000

1962

4,974,000

497,000

1963

5,057,800

506,000

1964

5,307,550

531,000

1965

6,589,600 ,

659,000

1966

7,260,000 (2)

726,000

1967

7,931,000 (2)

793,000

1968

8,602,000 (2)

860,000

1969

9,273,000 (2)

927,000

1970

9,944,000 (2)

994,000

1971

10,615,000 (2)

1,062,000

$

484,000

(1)

Represents 10 Percent of Assessed Value by Charter.

(2)

Based on the 1961 to 1965 Trend of an Annual Average Increase of $671,000 in Assessed Value Per Year.

Source:

'

Estimated
Bonding
Limits (1)

City Manager's Office

�-

63 -

Table 13

TRENDS IN TAX RATES
Gaylord, Michigan
Tax Rate Per $1,000 of Assessed Valuation (State Equalized)

Governmental
Unit
City
County
School
Operating
School Debt

1965

1961

1962

1963

1964

10.00

12.50

12.50

12.50

12.50

11.99(1)

9.60

8.50

7.64

7.76

7.16

5.94(2)

12.80

14.16

13.12

12.42

12.70

11.63(2)

5.60

5.66

3.06

6.14

6.06

3.13(2)

Intermediate
School
Total Tax
Rate

-

1960

38.00

40.82

36.32

38.82

.24

.24

38.66

32.93

I
1.

City is shown on assessed valuation.
on State equalized valuation.

would be 12.50 for 1965

2.

County and School are shown on State equalized valuation.

�I
64 •·--

Based on the 1965 valuation, an increase in the tax rate of
$1.00 would produce a revenue of $6,589. A $3.00 increase in
the tax rate, which represents 10 percent of the 1965 rate,
would produce an annual increased revenue of $19,767. Over a
20-year period, this would make available nearly $400,000 for
purposes of retiring principal and interest on a general obligation bond issue.
There are several methods available to Gaylord for the
financing of various capital improvements; the most common
method is by issuing general obligation bonds. They are retired by special real estate tax levies; i.e., an increase in
the present city tax rate. The second method of financing
capital improvements is through the issuance of revenue bonds these are generally issued for the financing of self-supported
public enterprises, such as water systems, off-street parking
facilities, and the like. Funds for paying the interest and
retiring the bonds are derived from income produced by the
facilities. One of the advantages of these bonds is that they
do not come under _ the limitation on the general bonded indebtedness imposed by state law. Although the "pay-as-you-go"
method has been used by some cities, such a procedure would
not be possible in Gaylord, as it would be many years before
the city could accumulate a cash fund for the purposes of
providing major capital improvements. Special assessments
provide another method by which public improvements may be
financed. This is particularly well used in areas where a
certain segment of the community will benefit from a public
facility.
Under this procedure, the benefited property pays
for all or almost all of the cost improvement. This might be
used for minor street improvements or for extension of sanitary sewers with assessment against abutting property owners.
Similar procedures have often been used by establishing benefit assessment districts for central area parking lots.
Proposed Capital Improvement Program
The comprehensive plan presents a broad concept of improvements that should be developed in the City of Gaylord
during the next 20 years. A proposed capital improvement
program has been developed to provide those improvements most
needed in the immediate future, designed to meet the financial
abilities of the community. One of the serious problems in
Gaylord is that much of the physical plant is obsolete and
deteriorating. This is especially true of the various utility
systems - water, sanitary, and storm facilities. Thus, the
community is now faced with the need for a fairly extensive
improvement program. ( See Table 14)

�~ 65 -

The proposed program involves considerable improvements
to the water system, the provision of storm drainage for the
central part of the city, minor sanitary sewer improvements,
the development of off-street parking lots in the central area,
continuing street ' maintenance, and the city providing its share
for the proposed city-county building. The proposed program,
to be carried out during the six-year period from 1966 through
1971, aggregates a total of $1,284,000.
General obligation
bonds comprise only $486,000 of this total, with the balance
consisting of revenue bonds and other sources. The total program is well within the estimated bonding power of the City
of Gaylord. As pointed out previously, the city had, in 1965,
a bonding limit of $659,000 with no outstanding bonds.
Water System Improvements
The water system in Gaylord is in a critical state of
deterioration, thus, it is essential that major improvements
be made in the near future. The citizens of Gaylord have recognized this need and approved a bond issue of $300,000 in an
election in 1965.
In a master plan for water supply, distribution, and storage, prepared in February, 1965, estimates
were outlined for a three-phase improvement program. Phase I
would include the replacement of all wood water mains, the
development of an additional well, and the construction of an
elevated storage tank. Water main replacement would amount
to $155,000; a 300,000 gallon elevated storage tank would cost
an estimated $72,000; and the well and pump house would cost
an estimated $22,000. This would amount to a total estimated
cost of $286,000, including engineering and contingencies.
The recently approved $300,000 bond issue would be used to
cover the cost of these improvements.
In order to retire
these obligation bonds, a three mill tax levy will be required. This levy would produce approximately $19,000 which would
be adequate to cover the principal and interest debt requirement of a $286,000 bond issue.
The Phase II water improvement program includes the replacement of undersized mains and the construction of new
mains to strengthen and improve the system, including a feeder
main to the northwest section of the city from the existing
north well. The total cost of this project is estimated at
$180,000.
It is recommended that revenue bonds be issued for
the Phase II improvements, to be retired from water system
revenues.
It is estimated that the water bills provide an
excess over operation of $15,000 annually, based upon the recently increased rates. Depending upon the interest rates,
the $180,000 revenue bonds could be retired -in 16 to 20 years.

�-

66 -

Storm Sewers
One of the most critical problems in Gaylord is the
standing storm water situation that occurs throughout the
central portions of the city.
In conjunction with the widening and improvement -of J1iain Street, Michigan Highway 32, by
the Michigan Highway Department, a significant change in the
storm drainage system can be effected. The Highway Department will pay for the· proper drainage of this major_ thoroughfare, for storm water produced by the new highway surface.
However, the City of Gaylord must be prepared to provide the
necessary storm sewer system to remove this water from the
central part of the city. Initial estimates indicate a cost
of $400,000 for such a storm drainage facility.
It is possible that the cost to the community will not be as high as
$400,000, as the State Highway Department may assume part of
the cost.
The Economic Development Administration, authorized to
carry out the Economic Opportunity Act, will assume the responsibility of the accelerated public works program. The
City of Gaylord should be eligible for a 50 percent matching
federal grant of $200,000 through this agency for one-half
of the cost of the $400,000 storm sewer improvement.
It is
recommended that the remaining local share of $200,000 be
derived from two sources. First, the city could issue $100,000
in general obligation bonds to be retired by the proceeds from
an additional one mi~l tax levy. This additional levy would
probably not be required for two or three years until the
Highway 32 improvement is initiated. The remaining $100,000
could be financed through . the use of motor vehicle funds; It
is estimated that the city will receive $28,000 annually in
returned motor vehicle funds. If $12,000 is to be used for
continued street maintenance, then $12,000 could be used to
pay off certificates of indebtedness for the city's remaining
$100,000 local share of the storm sewage improvement. This
would commit a total of $24,000 of the annual motor vehicle
funds.
The remaining $4,000 should be placed in a reserve
sinking fund.
Sanitary Sewers
The recently .completed sanitary sewer inventory did not
specifically indicate needed sanitary sewer projects. However,
it is apparent that improvements to the present system will be
required during the next six years.
In view of the fact that
the present quarterly minimum sanitary sewer charge is relatively low at $1.50, it is recommended that the minimum charge
be increased to $3.00 per quarter and that all of the rates
be doubled across the board. Thus, the present annual income

�- 67 -

of $11,000 to $12,000 would be increased by a like amount.
The additional $12,000 could then be used to retire as much
as $170,000 in sanitary sewer revenue bonds. As an alternate,
the entire $12,000 could be used for sanitary system improvements each year during the six-year period, a total of approximately $70,000 in sanitary sewer improvements. The latter
method is suggested and is shown in Table 14. If an emergency
arises or a ~ajor improvement is required, revenue bonds could
be issued.
Parking Lots
The City of Gaylord recently created a Building Authority
in accordance with Michigan statutes.
This authority is also
functioning as the parking authority for the city.
Concurrent
with planning for the central area, the authority has selected
a series of parking lots and is in the process of acquiring
properties. The authority issued $175,000 in revenue bonds
and will, in turn, lease the parking lots to the city for an
annual rent of $12,000. This $12,000 will be used by the
authority to retire the revenue bonds. The City of Gaylord
has received a pledge from the merchants for $7,500 annually
for a period of 10 years, for a total of $75,000. The remaining $4,500 for the $12,000 annual lease will be taken from
parking meter revenues, which are currently providing approximately $6,000 to $7,000 per year.
The 280-meter parking spaces to be developed in the new
off-street parking lots, in addition to the present off-street
parking facilities, should be adequate to meet the needs of
the central business district during the six-year program
through 1971.
Municipal Offices
The City of Gaylord and Otsego County have recently established a joint City-County Building Authority for the purpose of developing a city-county building as proposed in the
comprehensive plans. The public buildings section of the
county comprehensive plan indicated an initial cost of $950,000
for the entire structure.
It is estimated that the City of
Gaylord would require between 4,000 and 5,000 square feet of
space.
Assuming a building cost of $20 per square foot, the
city should be prepared to assume a responsibility for $100,000.
Assuming an annual debt requirement or lease requirement of
$7,000, the city would only need to budget approximately $2,000
a year over the present costs of the municipal building.
Such
a building is several years off and, at that time, it may be
necessary to increase the tax levy by 0.3 mills. Further, it

�- 68 Table 14
PROPOSED SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Gaylord, Michigan

Total
Cost

Purpose
Water System Phase I
Water System Phase II
Storm Sewers
Sanitary Sewers
Parking Lots
Municipal _Offices
Continuing Street
Improvements

$

286,400

Parking Meter
Revenue
Bonds
$

100,000
175-000&lt; 2 &gt;

'

100,000

72,000
$1,283,000

Water
Charge
Revenue
Bonds

Water System Phase I
$
Water System Phase II
180,000
Storm Sewers
Sanitary Sewers
Parking Lots
Municipal Offices
Continuing Street
Improvements
TOTAL

$286,000(l)

180,000
400,000
70,000
175,000
100,000

TOTAL

Purpose

General
Obligation
Bonds

$180,000

$486,000

$175,000

Federal
Grants

Motor
Vehicle
Funds

Sanitary
Charge
Revenue
Bonds

$

$
200,000

100,000

70,000

72,000
$70,000

$200,000

$172,000

(1)

From Bond Issue of $300,000 approved in 1965 election.

(2)

Revenue Bonds obtained in 1965.

�•
•
•
•
~

- 69 is possible that federal grants are available for 75 percent
of the cost of th ~ building which would negate the need for
any tax levy.
Financing of the city's share is shown as general obligation bonds in Table 14. If a federal grant is not forthcoming, the city would be required to raise the monies in
this manner.
In view of the fact that the present debt limit
of the city is relatively restricted, it would be possible
for Otsego County to assume the full faith and credit of all
the $950,000 needed for the city-county building.
Thus, the
city would only pay rent to the City-County Building Authority
and would not encumber its bonding power. The county has a
bonding limit of $2,900,000 and the proposed capital improvement program for the county only uses a relatively small part
of this bonding power •
Continued Street Improvements
The city has maintained a relatively sound street system
over the years.
In recent years, approximately $12,000 of
the motor vehicle funds have been used for annual street maintenance.
It is proposed that this be continued during the
six-year program; thus, a total of $72,000 would be used for
this purpose in the program. The remaining $16,000 of the
existing motor vehicle funds would be used as previously discussed; i.e., $12,000 to retire storm sewer certificates of
indebtedness and $4,000 for a reserve sinking fund.
Cost of the Program
The proposed six-year capital improvement program would
obviously require increased taxes and service charges to the
citizens of Gaylord. The $386,000 in general obligation bonds
(not including the municipal offices) will require a three
mill increase for the already approved water system bond issue,
and an additional one mill for the $100,000 in sanitary sewer
bonds. Thus, the present tax rate would increase from 12.50
mills to 16.50 mills. Also, the present minimum sanitary
sewer charge would increase from $1.50 to $3,00 quarterly. The
proposed increase of 4.0 mills would produce approximately
$26,000, which is about $10.00 per capita per year. The increased sanitary sewer charges would amount to approximately
$2.00 per capita. The proposed capital improvement program
would provide the community with much needed public improvements at a relatively minor cost to the citizens. The undertaking of these essential improvements will be dependent upon
the willingness of the citizens to further improve their community.

�ill
ill

1)11

11111

ill
ill

"ill

- 71 -

PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION
The Comprehensive Plan for Gaylord is a guide for future
physical development of the city affecting both public and
private entities, and is intended to create a well designed,
efficient, and desirable community. The preparation of the
plan is the responsibility of the City Planning Commission
with the support of the citizens of the city and the adoption
and enforcement of the plan by the City Council and city
officials.
The Planning Commission, however, as the sponsor
of the plan and advisor to the city authorities should continue to review all matters affecting physical development of
the city and should remain active in promoting the plan in
the community.
The plan itself is merely a blueprint for an orderly and
attractive community which Gaylord should strive to be in the
future.
The task remains of actually bringing into being
this planning program. This can be accomplished through careful guidance and direction of the many day-to-day activities
affecting the physical city and to gradually carry out the
various improvements proposed in the plan. The plan is of
little or no value unless it is followed and its recommendations are carried out in the ensuing years.
The preparation of a comprehensive plan will not, in itself, insure a successful planning program in Gaylord.
Many
plans have been prepared in other cities, set aside, and the
development in these communities continued without direction.
Experience has indicated that there are five basic measures
that are required to ·develop a city in accordance with a plan.
These are briefly reviewed:
Independent Planning Agency.
There must be an independent planning agency.
The task of securing the planned development of a city is too great to be entrusted to an agency or
department whose responsibilities are chiefly in another field.
The planning agency should be independent of other municipal
agencies and should be given legal powers sufficient to permit
it to advise, and have its advice heeded, by other local public
bodies including independent agencies and State and Federal
commissions or boards who are engaged in building activities
in the community.
While in one sense it is necessary for the
planning agency to be objective and independent, its activities must be integrated with the municipal governmental structure to insure the proper coordination of the day-by-day activities of the official policy making and constructing departments and officials.

�-

72 -

Officially Adopted Comprehensive Plan. There must be an
officially adopted comprehensive plan. The building of a city
is a gradual process of growth carried on by numerous individuals and agencies and it is imperative that there be a guide
for the coordination of the process, expressed in terms of a
comprehensive city plan.
This plan must have official recognition through adoption by the City Planning Commission. Th i s
official adoption will then insure the attention to the plan
by city departments and other jurisdictions. As a practical
matter any city plan to be successful must be worked out,
maintained, and constantly revised in consultation with all
public agencies that are involved and affected. To be successful, it must not just have the acceptance, but the enthusiastic approval, of the various public agencies and officials.
Private Development Coordinated.
To insure that private
property development is properly coordinated with the comprehensive plan, legal measures are required.
Controlling the
basic land use pattern, the zoning ordinance is one of the
most important parts of a city plan. Through subdivision
regulations, new residential areas can be designed within the
framework of the comprehensive plan. Areas for new thoroughfares and for parks and schools may be reserved in the proper
place.
Public Improvements Coordinated. Public improvements
must be coordinated with the plan. The comprehensive plan
should be a major consideration in the design of all public
improvements. To insure proper consideration of such improvements, the Planning Commission should be charged with the responsibility of reviewing plans for all public improvements
prior to authorization or construction.
If the improvement
is in accordance with the plan, it is approved.
If it conflicts with the plan, it is disapproved or an appropriate modification is suggested.
Public Support.
There must be public understanding and
support of the plan. No matter how excellent the planning
laws, no matter how sound and inspiring the city plan, no
matter how sympathetic and cooperative the officials may be,
the comprehensive plan will not be carried out unless the
plan is generally understood and approved by, and has the
backing of the people of the community.
Coordination of Public Improvements
For many years, the State of Michigan has had legislation
providing for the creation of a city planning commission, outlining the power and authority of such commissions, and providing for the preparation and adoption of comprehensive city plans.

�II
II
II
II

II
II
II

II

I

I

'.

- 73 -

This act authorizes the appointment of a city planning commission, establi~hes the term of office for such members,
provides for the organization of the commission, the making
of reports, the employment of consultants, et cetera.
The Planning Commission bas wide powers in reviewing
and making recommendations concerning all public improvements.
The Council having jurisdiction over projects can, of course,
override an adverse recommendation of the Commission; but,
the requirement that the plans for the improvement be reviewed
before it is built affords an opportunity for coordination
with the city plan and allows the Planning Commission to bring
to the attention of the appropriate public officials any lack
of conformity with the plan.
It also affords time for public
opinion to be heard, provides a means of keeping the public
and the council informed concerning the plan, _and insures that
the city plan will be considered in the location and design
of all such improvements.

-II

Michigan State law requires that the compr~hensive plan,
or any part thereof, · shall be adopted by resolution of the
Commission.
After its adoption by the Commission, an attested
copy of the plan must be certified to the council, and the
County Registrar of Deeds, and after · which action~ the plan
constitutes the official city plan. Amendment of the comprehensive plan can be made, but only after referral to the City
Planning Commission for its recommendations.

II

A greater part of Gaylord is composed of private buildings. The various public improvements such as streets, utilities, schools, et cetera, are service facilities which enable
the private developments to function.
Consequently, if the
basic pattern of the community is to conform with the plan,
several regulatory measures are needed to help guide private
building construction.

Ill

II
II
II

·•,

;

Guidance of Private Development

Recommendations on certain regulatory measures were presented in previous preliminary reports.
These include the
zoning ordinance, the subdivision regulations, and a major
street plan. These regulations either direct private growth
or control the standards of private development.
Mere adoption of these laws is not enough as they should be carefully
administered and strictly enforced.
One of the major activities of the City Planning Commission will be the administration of the zoning and subdivision
regulations. From time to time, there will be petitions and

�"
"II
II
II
II
II

- 74 requests for changes in the zoning ordinance. Each of these
should be studied on the basis of the conditions and, especially, from the standpoint of the desirable development of
the community as a whole. The ordinance should never be made
subject to easy and frivolous amendments.
Nonetheless, there
will be instances when revision is desirable. These changes
should be made only after the most careful appraisal of the
conditions and the weighing of public· interests and welfare,
to insure that the change is warranted.
Similar careful consideration should be given to each subdivision design. Once
the plat is recorded and streets and lots laid out, the pattern is fixed, and the design of the area should be made as
nearly perfect as possible in its very conception.
Public Understanding and Support

-II

It is essential that the citizens of Gaylord· understand
the many problems confronting the city as revealed by the
comprehensive plan; how the plan can assist in solving these
problems; and the many advantages that the citizens as · a whole
may derive therefrom. · No matter how effective the legal procedures that are made available for carrying out the plan, the
administration cannot· be completely successful unless the plan
is understood by, and has the support of, · the public.
Lack
of understanding of comprehensive plans · by the citizens has
invariably been one of the weakest phases of planning programs.

II

1. An active citizen committee that remains as a permanent organization is of great value in a planning program.
Through this permanent committee, the will of the community
will thus be represented and expressed to advise upon the various elements of the plan. "The intelligent understanding and
wide representation of such an organization can consolidate
public opinion in favor of developing the city in a truly democratic manner along the principles set forth in the city plan.

"-II
II
II

The following are suggested measures for obtaining citizen
understanding and support of the planning program in Gaylord:

2. Publication and distribution of the plan provides an
important means of acquainting the public with its aims and
proposals. The area newspapers and radio stations have done
an excellent job of publicizing the studies and proposals.
3.
Another important means of gaining public understanding and support is the inclusion of studies of the plan in the
elementary and high school curricula.
Copies of the reports,
including the final report, should be placed in all school and
public libraries. ·

�111

111

"Ill

Ill
Ill
Ill

-Ill
"
II
II
"-II

- 75 4.
Annual reports published by the City Planning Commission could be efnective tools in informing the public of
progress on the plan.
5.
The Planning Commission could form an ex-officio publicity committee consisting of approximately three members,
one member of the Commission, a member of the city staff, and
a member of an active community organization such as the
Chamber of Commerce. This committee could prepare map displays for retail stores and banks, arrange for newspaper and
radio publicity, develop color slides and models of the longrange program.
Planning Commission Program
In order for the planning program in Gaylord to be effective and actually serve as a guide for future development,
certain major steps must be initiated by the City Planning Commission in the near future.
These important steps are essential and immediate objectives.
It is the responsibility of
the City Planning Commission to initiate these programs _reviewed in the following:
1. Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
The ' first and
the most important step is the adoption of .the comprehensive
plan.
~e_veral phases have already b,een adopt~d by the Commission.
All of the other actions and programs of the city
to guiqe the future development are based upon this comprehensive plan.
The City Planning Commission should pursue the
adoption of the plan.
2. Recommendations on a Capital Improvement Program. The
comprehensive plan outlined an extensive number of public improvements that should be developed in Gaylord during the next
twenty years.
The development of these public improvements
should start immediately so that they are developed gradually
over a period of years. Therefore, it is imperative that the
city undertake a sound program for capital improvements. The
Planning Commission should refine the capital improvement program and forward it to the City Council recommending its execution.
3.
Publish a Summary Report. Publication and distribution of the comprehensive plan is the first important means of
familiarizing the public with the Commission's activities.
The mere printing of the plan in its entirety will not, however, be adequate means of securing public understanding. Many
people will not read such a report and many will not remember
the large amount of data and recommendations contained therein.

�- 76 It is essential that an educational program of a more visual
nature be presented. A summary brochure of the plan, presented
in this manner, should be prepared for a wide-scale distribution.
4. Planning Publicity Programs.
The Planning Commission
should inaugurate a publicity program. Educational activities
must be continued in succeeding years, for a single program,
even though extensive, is quickly forgotten.
The Planning
Commission should publish annual reports as well as any special
studies of city-wide interest which it may undertake.
These
reports should clearly present accomplishments that have been
made under the comprehensive plan and through capital improvement programs.
City Council Program
The City Council, as the legislative body of the municipal government, has the final responsibility for all planning
in the community.
It is therefore essential that the Council
pursue a program in order to make effective use of the comprehensive plan for Gaylord.
A program, pertaining to planning,
is outlined in the following:
1. Acceptance of the Plan. Following refinement and
adoption of the comprehensive plan by the City Planning Commission, the Commission would forward the plan to the City
Council. This plan will represent the combined thinking of
the Planning Commission members, the consultants, and interested citizens.
It is the responsibility of the City Council
to accept the plan as a public document to serve the present
and future City Councils.
2.
Initiate Improvements.
The capital improvement program, based upon the comprehensive plan, should be forwarded
to the City Council by the Planning Commission. The City Council should carefully review the proposed program, revise and
modify it according to their judgment of local needs, and initiate legislation for its execution. Gaylord bas many pressing
needs for public improvement and a delay in providing these improvements will only create a greater burden for the community
in the future.
3. Adoption of Regulatory Measures.
Following action by
the Planning Commission, the City Council should proceed with
the adoption of the revisions in the zoning ordinance and the
subdivision regulations. These municipal ordinances are necessary for the City Council to properly control and guide future
private development.

�"
":
"-II
-II
II
II

-II
II
II
II
II

- 77 Planning Commission Policies and Procedures
Any major public physical improvement should be referred
to the Commission for study and report before it is initiated
and land purchased therefor. A cooperative action between the
City Planning Commission and the City Council will be required
to make it effective. The Commission must be kept informed
regarding changing conditions or unexpected trends which may
require some adjustments in the long-range plan and in the
capital improvement program.
Such adjustments should not result in abandoning the basic principles or the major proposals
of the plan, but will consist largely of minor modifications
to meet changing conditions. The Planning Commission should
act as an advisory body to the City Council for any public project that would affect the general deve_lopment of the community.
The Planning Commission should interpret the comprehensive plan
for the City Council.
One of the important functions of the Planning Commission
should be an annual review of the capital improvement program
in cooperation with the affected officials and agencies.
The
Planning Commission is concerned with all improvements affecting the community and it is the logical agency to suggest their
coordination and scheduling. The City Council should direct
the Planning Commission to prepare annually a program of capital improvements for their consideration.
The new zoning ordinance provides that the Planning Commission shall study any change requested in the zoning ordinance or district map and make a report before official action
is taken by the City Council.
The Planning Commission is the
logical agency to consider such changes, as it has thoroughly
studied all of the major phases of urban development and is
conversant with the data and principles on which the zoning
ordinance is based. There are several phases of zoning administration upon which the City Council and the City Planning
Commission are required to take action.
The proposed land subdivision ordinance places heavy responsibility on the Planning Commission.
Each subdivision plat
is submitted to the City Planning Commission for careful examination to determine whether it conforms to the general provisions of the comprehensive plan and to the standards established
by the regulations.
The responsibility of the Planning Commission is to determine general overall policy and to make decisions on matters
referred to it concerning the physical development of the city.
The Commission should have a carefully worked out set of rules

�- 78 -

and bylaws and an established procedure.
The latter should
include, among other things, the establishment of regular
monthly meeting dates and deadlines for the submission of
matters to be considered at regular meetings. Close cooperation between the city and the county should be encouraged
by the City Planning Commission.
Joint meetings between the
city and the county should create an excellent liaison.
The Planning Commission should not only be aware of local
trends, but should stay informed of new trends and major developments in other cities. Attendance at state and national
conferences or meetings on planning and urban development is
helpful in keeping the Commission and the community informed
of progress and experience in handling local problems in other
urban areas.
The Planning Commission should also be a service
organization for supplying data and information on local conditions and for helpful assistance to both private and public
agencies in dealing with current problems.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008297">
                <text>Gaylord_Comprehensive-Plan_1966</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008298">
                <text>Harland Bartholomew and Associates</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008299">
                <text>1966-05</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008300">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008301">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Gaylord was prepared by Hardland Bartholomew and Associates in May 1966.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008302">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008303">
                <text>Gaylord (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008304">
                <text>Otsego County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008305">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008307">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008308">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008309">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008310">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038325">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54718" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58989">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8bb1038c52e21a1a2e607cad66da543f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ed34a37af150d8557b3fcfcffebbb7ca</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008587">
                    <text>C

WIIM·ml✓ Wo'llt.-O~l

J!

ANN

&amp;

I..

ONANHIILL

1lc4i,d.,W441 ~
SIN6LE.-FiA.MILY RESIDENTIAL

ACTIVE R.EOEATIDN - ScA.oat) , ~

s/~)

-

LOW DE.NSfTY' MULTI-F/\MILY (1bWNHOUSES-

-

MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FM11LY (~N H'AATS. - 10/~

-

COMMERCIAi-

-

~ESE.ARCH PARK -

c::::I

PUf&gt;LIC - TIII.IMd"'f I ~

--i-

PASSIVE 12.ECREATION

4 NATURAL AAEAS

MARINAS

SMALL BOATING ROUTE.S

¥ ~

- - THOl2DUGHFA12E
C..CLLECTOR

GLIASl -f'UeLIC -

~ ,~

LOCAL. STREET

c.e..n,..,

SPECIAL - Ru.,e,.,l&lt;=b, M ~ .

The preparation of this material was financed in part t hrough an urban
planning grant from the Department of Hou:imi: and Urban Development,
under tt1e provisions ot Stclion 701 of the Hou~ng Acl of 1954.
as amended. administered by the Mithi2an Department of Commeri:e.

.

~S..,,,,·~
~·~

~CW./f'Ml
~~

~
luld-e

�L

I

V

I

N

G

9

T

o

N
CHANH

&amp;

L

....

5U(i,ll,£

1:SJ.ANP

St.I.,~·~

~~
•
I

~f)'M,

i'"'°°
I

2-tc&gt;O FT

I

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008573">
                <text>Grosse-Ile-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan-Map_1969</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008574">
                <text>Johnson, Johnson &amp; Roy, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008575">
                <text>1969-01-20</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008576">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008577">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan map for Grosse Ile Township was prepared by Johnson, Johnson &amp; Roy, Inc. on January 20, 1969.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008578">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008579">
                <text>Grosse Ile Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008580">
                <text>Wayne County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008581">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008583">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008584">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008585">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008586">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038343">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54729" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59000">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/3fb779ccb97a74dd998729e6e119706b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6739a0cc120ceaff69871dfcb4927558</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008757">
                    <text>COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ISHPEMING T01lNSHIP

Prepared for
ISHPEMING TOvlNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION

September 1978

,...

by the Marquette County Planning Commission

----

�Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN?

....•..............

1

CHAPTER I: POPULATION•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
CHAPTER II: NATURAL FEATURES AND RESOURCES.....................
CHAPTER III: THE ECONOMY......................................

36

CHAPTER IV:

I.....l\.ND USE ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

50

CHAPTER V: TRANSPORTATION •.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
CHAPTER VI: RECREATION
CHAPTER VII: WATER AND WASTEWATER •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
CI~i\PTER VIII: COMMUNITY FACILITIES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

63

86

CHA...PTER IX:

88

........................................

HOUSiriG ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

It

•

•

•

•

•

•

CHAPTER X: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES...............................
CHAPTER XI: IMPLEMENTATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

3
13

76
81

99
108

List of Tables

TABLE 1:
TABLE 2:

INTERPRETATION OF 30ILS FOR ISHPEMING TOWNSHIP•••••••
EMPLOYMENT TABLES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

TABLE 3:
TABLE 4:

TOTAL BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS &amp; PAYROLLS•••••••••••••
TOWNSHIP ROAD COMPOSITE ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

26
39
42
67

List of Figures

Figure 2: Bedrock Geology o•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Figure 3: Surficial Geology • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

14
16
18

Figure 4: Slope

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••o••••••••••••••••

21

Figure 5: Soil Associations••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

23
28

Figure 1 :

Figure 6:

Vegetation•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

7: Minerals ..•........................•....••......•....
Figure 8: Land Use Suitability•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Figure 9: Lorenz Curve•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Figure

Figure 10:Lorenz Curve•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Figure 11:Wage

•
I

&amp;

33
34

ioa
40

Salary Employment &amp; Labor and Proprietor

Earnirigs - 1974 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

43

Figure 12:Index to Land Use Maps•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

55

Figure 13:Land Use - Map One•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

56

�INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN?
A Comprehensive Plan is an official document adopted by a local government aa a policy guide in malting decisionaabout the physical development of
the community.

It indicates how the leaders of the government want the com-

munity to develop in the next 10 to 20 yee.'l's ..

There have been muny terms

and definitions used to describe a comprehensive plan, but T.J. Went, a

leading figure in the area of planning, has stated that

II

the general plan

ic the official statement of a municipal legislative body which sets forth
its major policies concerning deairable future physical development."

Why is a Plan Needed?
A plan ia needed because local govern@eLts, such as Ishpeming Township,
make or influence decisions concerning many physical d~velopments which occur in the community~

Moat local governments are cmmposed of lay citizens

and technological guidance is neededin making these decisions.

Planners

can proyide guidance in this deciaion-making process by establishing general
policies, whose goal is the betterment of the community.
The Importance of the LegislativeBody
Because of their role in planning, the Ishpeming Township Board and the
Ishpeming Township Planning Commission must

be

aware of both local needs and

the numerous land use changes and policy making decisions that are made within
the Township and surrounding areas and aid boards in making important policy
decisions.

The Scone of the Plan
There are many different ideas concerning the scope of the plan.

Some

people believe that the plan should include physical characteristics such aa,
size,location, and regional development, and others believe that it should
center around economic and administrative planning. Henry Fagin suggests that
a physical plan and all other plans ehould be unified in an ultra-comprehensive "policies plan."

The scope

or

the Ishpeming Townehip Comprehensive Plan

includes physical development, a land use inventory, population projections,
the economy, natural features and resources, transportation,

1

�I
I

-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

CHAPTER I
POPULATION
Introduction
Births, deaths, migration, and other population characteristics affect
the provision of essential municipal services to residents.

A major ftmc-

tion of com~unity planning is to determine the number of new municipal services that should be provided to meet existing and future community needs.
Decisions of local officials concerning land use development and new services will depend on future population projections and characteristics.
T'nis chapter will analyze population trends and projectionc, and population
characteristics such as education levels, age and aex distributions, and
household types.
Population Trends
To make a meaningful assessment of the population, it is important to
analyze past population growth and to examine regional and local factors
that are likely to have a strong influence on future growth.

The following

table lists past population figures for the To~mship.
Past Population Figures for Ishpeming Tm-mship

19:ro

1920

587

1044

? J_J ~ rn1t 0
Source:

1229.
1064
)

··,if.,

✓

1,

::;;-,··,-I ,...

1940

1950

1331
... ~···

1517

,

1960
/·_✓:--~ ,

2238

..,...

---

2457
. ,-·•-

../.?~:,1 ...

U.S. densus

Growth in the Township prior to 1900 was difficult to determine.

T'ne popu-

lation in the Township tends to follow the fluctuations in the mining industry.

The table below compares the Township changes in the last three dec-

ades with the County, the central region, and the state.

3

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

projections for 1980.
Arithmetic Projection.

An arithmetic projection assumes that the

average numerical increase which the Township experienced in the past will
continue into the future with no significant change.

The population of

Ishpeming Township has increased from 360 persons in 1900 to 2,457 persons
in 1970.

This averages out to an increase of 30 persons per year.

Based

upon this yearly growth, the Township will have 2,757 persons in 1980.
The arithmetic p~ojection does not consider birth and death rates, nor migration into or out of the Township except in an indirect manner since average figures are products of births, deaths, and migration.
Ratio Method.

The ratio projection has the advantage of utilizing

population projections of larger geographic areas, thereby overcoming many
of the inherent problems of population projections.

Marquette County was

plotted in relationship to the State of Michigan and the Township was plot~
ted in relationship to Marquette County.

Using this method, the Township

would have a population of 2,912 by 1980.
~inear Regression.

The linear regression establishes a trend line

from past populations and then projects it into the future.

This line in-

dicates that in 1980 Ishpeming Township will have a population of 2,830
persons.
To get a more accurate idea of the rate of growth in the Township
since 1970, an estimate of the 1977 population was made using the number
of dwelling units located in the Township during a windshield survey completed in March of 1977.
located in this survey.

There were 1,016 year-round occupied residences
The 1977 population was derived by multiplying

the number of year-round occupied residences by 3.2, the average number
of persons per household in Marquette County,
Township had a population of 3,251 in 1977.

Using this method, the
This agrees fairly well with

the Michigan Department of Management and Budget's July 1976 estimate of

3, 22L~ ( the figure used in Federal Revenue Sharing programs).

These figures

already surpass the 1980 projected population, indicating an exceptionally
high rate of growth.
The population in the Township increased approximately 31% between 1970

I
I
I

and 1977.

This percentage is already

population of the previous decade.

well above the 10% increase in the

This rapid rate of increase is probably

due to the expansion of the iron ore mines and the tremendous growth in the
County as a whole, particularly near the urban areas.
Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company revealed that
C

A survey conducted by

5.8% of their employees

�upper half of the range provided by the five methods.
visor predicts a population of 3,500 by 1980.

The Township super-

The 1980 Census should be

used to update the figures and make projections for 1985.

The rate of growth

between 1980 and 1985 will probably slow down considerably since ClevelandCliffs does not anticipate hiring a significant number of new employees during
this period.

Ish~eming Township Population Trends

4000
3500
3000

. . .·.· .. ·....·. •. •, . .·.. .:,,-.-:•:

:i:;:;:;:;~:;:;;;:;;;::;::::.-. --- ,·:. :,·

25 00
2000
1500
1000
1940

1950

1960

1970

1977

1980

Population Characteristics
The characteristics of the population are also improtant since needed
facilities and services should be based on who is using them.

Different

priorities would be established for an older population than a younger one~
Therefore, the age, sex, and education.. of persons in the Township will be
studied.

The income level of the Township is discussed in the economy chap-

ter,
Education.

There is a distinct link between educational attainment,

family inaome, arld the economic and employment characteristics of -a community.

Areas which have a high educational level generally have a high

average family income, a low unemployment rate, and a healthy,rate of economic growth.

The following tables outline the number of people enrolled

in schools and the educational level of the population in 1970.

,.,

�11
To get a relative idea of the educational level in· the Township, the
following chart compares the Township to other governmental units.
Years of Schools Completed: Persons
25 Years Old and Over

o-4

5-8

.2.:.1.1

12

Ishpeming Township

3.. 8%

24.3%

17.5%

17.9%

12.0

City of Marquette

1.6%

16.0%

15.4%

36.6%
36.8%

30.2%

12.5;,

Marquette County
1
Central Region

2 .. 7%

19·o8% · 18.5%

39.0%

20.of,

12.2

3.5%

19.1%

12.0

3 .. 8%

22.1%

36.6%
33 .. 6%

15.6%

State of Michigan

25.2%
22.1%

12.1

United States

3 .. 9%

19.3°;6

19.3%

31.o%

19.196
21.1%

1

lli

Median

12.1

The central region contains the counties of Alger, Delta, Dickinson,
Marquette, Menominee, and Schoolcraft.

Source:

1970 U.S. Census

The educational level for Ishpeming Township closely follows that of
the central region, both having
education.

3E.. 6% of the population with a high school

It is slightly lower than that of the County as a whole, which

is surprising since the Township had the third highest family income of all
the townships in the County in 1970.

The higher level of education in the

City of Marquette in understandable because of the Northern Michigan University staff and the large percentage of government em:ployment in the city.
The percentage of higher education in the To~nship is relatively low compared to the other units.
Age Distribution.
future of the region.

Age distribution poses serious implications for the
Both the youngest and oldest age groups make the

greatest demands on the community for social and welfare services, such as
education, recreation, and medical care.
all

Yet, they are the least able of

age groups to contribute to meeting the cost of these programs.

The

financialrburden, via tax .payments, therfore, falls on those gainfully em-

0

�~
Sex Distribution by Age Groups

1970
Female

Male
~

Number

Bercent

Number

Percent

0-20
21-44
45-64
65+

586
317
178
90

46.1
24.9
21.9
7.1

507
356
247
76

42.7
30.0
20.8
6.4

TOTAL

1271

Source:

1186

1970 U.S. Census

In order to get an idea of the predominate living units, a breakdown
of the types of households in the Township is provided below.
Count of Persons by Household
Relationship and Sex
Male Primary Individual
Female Primary Individual
Male Head of Household
Female Head of Household
Wife of Head
Child of Head
Other Relative of Head
Nonrelative
TOTAL
Source:

40
44
576
79
493
1125
68
32
2!,57

1970 U.S. Census

As can be seen, a family unit with a male head was the dominant type
of household in 1970.
Issues and Problems
-

Ishpeming Township experienced considerable growth during the last
three decades, increasing from 1,311 persons in 19~0 to 2,457 persons in 1970.

�CIIAPTl!J? I I

NATURAL FEATURES AND ID;SOURCES.:.

Introduction
Ishpeming Township is an area of natural beauty with towering rock
bluffs and bedrock formations, dense hardwood forests, countless freshwater etrsarno and lakea, and abundant wildlife.

The relatively low pop-

ulation of the Township has saved the area from urban blight and the consequent estrangement frorn the natural environment.

Nevertheless, the

Township lies adjacent to an area that contains valuable mineral resources
which have led to economic growth and an in~reasing population.

Because

of this growth, the Township must recognize the problems that an increased
population brings, and take steps to preserve its natural resourceso

Se-

parate planning and development decisions, made without regard for the intricate balance existing between the different resources of the ecosystem,
can lead to devastating results, such as the massive destruction of the
forests that occurred nemrly a century ago.
The :proper use of natural resources fulfills several roles which ~re

discussed in this chapter.

The ~ise use of natural resources fulfills an

ecological role by providing

a

healthful area with clear water and air,

healthy vegetation, and needed wildlife; an economic _role by ensuring good
soils for agricultw&gt;~ 9 forests for lumber, minerals for excavation, and
sources for employment; a recreation role by meeting the growing need for
a variety of outdoor activities; and an amenity role by preserving and developlng the landscape to enhance the beauty and liveability of the area.
The natural features and resource section of the comprehensive plan should
be used aa a guide for making sound zoning regulations anddavelopmental decisions.

Topographz.
Ishpeming Township contains dramatic shifts in topography as can be
seen in Figure 1. The land changes from flat plains and rolling hills in the
south to rock cliffs and hilly terrains interspersed with large bedrock outcroppings in the north.

Low lying marsh areas occur mainly in the southern

part of the Township around Deer Lake, the Carp River, Big Mud Lake, and the
western half of the Dead River Storage Basin. The heavy regular snowfall,

�the varying topography, and numerous bodies of water make the Township excellent for year-round recreational activity.
geologic History
The igneous and metamorphic rock outcroppings that are scattered through. out the Township are of the lower and middle Pre-Cambrian Age.

During the Pa-

leozoic ~ra, the present sequence of gently dipping sedimentary rock which overlie the Pracambrian rock uere deposited.,

These sedimentary rocks vary in

thickness since they were laid down on an irrogular erosional surface.

The

action of glacial ice, during the Pleistocene Epoch, profoundly altered the
landscape of the aren ..

Glacial deposits, varying in depth from zero to 300

feet, have probably been the most important factor in determin~ng the present
topogr~phy.

Ruman activities appear to be the only significant f~ctor that

could alter the landscape within the foreseeable future.
Ishpeming Township's topographic and geological features provide some
natural determinants which, when coupled with human-made featuras, begin to
suggest a developmental pattern for the Township.

The following natural frea-

ture.s and geologic conditions must be considered in the planning process and
used as a guide to sound zoning proposa:Jsand regulations.
Bedrock Geology
Bedrock is tha solid rock at or near the earth's surfa~e, which is generally concealed by layers of loose fragmented rock.

Thase layers may have

formed in place by the decomposition of the underlying parent rock, or they
may be an accumulation of foreign rock fragments transported and deposited
by wind, water,. or ico.

Land use is often determined by bedrock geologic conditions. The distribution and character of mineral deposits are governed by bedrock conditions.
For example, iron formations occu?! vitliin the Middle Prf:cambrian sedimentary
rock.

Bedrock geology is also related to the occurrence of ground water.

The

quantity and quality of well water varies with the type of bedrock and the
overlying materials thorugh which the water must pass.

The water capacity for

the two types of bedrock found in the Township are described below and the location of the bedrock can be seen in Figure 2.

�Precambria~

This bedrock underlies almostl

excluding the northeastern tip.

l of ffishp~ming Township,

These ancient igneous and metamorphic rocks

have highly variable water capacities.

In the upland areas, most wells will

fail to obtain enough water for domestic pusposes.

In valleys having more

than 20 feet of permeable drift, wells drilled a few feet into the underlying
bedrock may yield enough water for domestic purposes.
than 10 gpm.

A few may yield more

Drilling more than 100 feet into this bedrock is ususally futile.

Jacobsville Sandstoneo

This sandstone nicks the northeastern corner of

the Township and is an important source of water..

Al though this sandstc-ne is

over 1,000 feet tinck most wells tap water at less than 100 feet.

As with all

bedrock, permeability decreases with depth due to the tremendous

pressure that

squeezes together the joints and fractures..

Water from the JacobmziH.e is ge-

nerally moderately hard to hard, and locally it contains objectionable amounts
of iron and chlorides.
Surficial Geology
Surficial geology deals with the composition, areal distribution and thickness qf soil and rock materiala in the uppermost portion of the earth's crust.
In Ishpeming Township, these ~ear-surface materials are primarily unconsolidated
debris left by the melting of glaciers approximately 10 1 000 to '11,000 years ago.
Host of these materials, ranging in size from clay to boulders, were transported
and deposited by glacial ice.

These areas are called tills. A: few of the depo-

sits, such as outwash, were deposited by melted streams and consist mainly of
well sorted sand and gravel.
Surficial geology has definate effects on vegetation and land use.

Areaa

of knobby terrain and thin surficial cover tend to be areas of mining acticities
and related mineral produetion.

The hilly m~raine areas where surficial cover

is thisker are used for crops and pasture.

Surficial geology is also related to

surface water flow in that infiltration and runoff is directly governed by the
permeability of the underlying materials.
discussed below.

Its relationship to ground water is

Activites such as increased farming, mining, and urban de-

velopment could locally increase the rate of erosion and significantly alter
the present geologic environment within the immediate future.

The location of

deposited materials in the Township can be seen in Figure 3.
Swamp Deposits and Recent Alluvium.

Swamp deposits and recent alluvium

consist of sand, silt, clay, peat, and muck which have accumulated in low areas since the retreat of the glaciers.

Both the composition and thickness of

these deposits are extremely variable, and material types and depths at speoific locations are determinable only by sampling and drilling.

The general wet

nature of these materials presents construction problems for most types of fa-

�cilities.

Water ~ields are similar to lak~ plain yie~ds.

These deposits occur in low areas around Big Mud Lake and the western
portion of the Dead River Storage Basin.

Glacial Outwasho

.Outvash areas

consist of stratified sands and gravels

which have washed out beyond the glacial front by maltwater.

Very coarse se-

diments were generally deposited near the ice front; finer sands and silts
were laid down farther out on the outwash plain.

Most outwash deposits are

tens of feet thick, but aome are hundreds of feet thick in local areas.

The

porosity and permeability of outwash are much greater than till, and it is
normally soft or moderately hard.

In some areas water may contain objection-

able amounts of iron.
Outwash deposits cover fairly large areas in the southwaatern, mideastern, and northeastern sections of the Township.
Glacial No:r:,iine.

One of tho moat prominent glacial features is the u-

nique hilly terrain, called moraines, left after the glaciers 1 retreat.

Most

of these moraines originated at a stabilized front of an active glacier, where
the forward movement of ice equaled the melting rate.

In such a situation,

large quantities of ground-up rock melt out of the ice and are deposited in
ridges parallel to the ice front; called an end moraine.

The area adjacent

to the end moraine in the direction of glacial retreat may be characteri~ed
by gentle r olling terrain.

These areas are underlain .by till and sometimes

referred to as ground moraines.

Permeability varies greatly being low in

clayey till and high in outwash areas.

Moraines are a source of domestic

water supply and some areas may yield moderate supplies of water.

Morainal

depoaits can reach a depth of over 300 feet.
Morainal deposits occur in large areas throughout the central portion of
the Township.
Glacial Till-Bedrock.

Bedrock is generally unweatherod and hard, because

the weathered rock has been scoured avay by the glaciers.

Bedrock e~sures

occur in many arenr. and in unexposed areas is generally at a depth of at least

6•.

The bedrock is composed of metamorphic rock types of the Precambrian age

and is a poor source of ground water.

All exposed bedrock outcrops should be

considered unripp~ble.
Bedrock occurs in scattered areas throughout the Township.

19

�4

· SLOPE

SLOPE

II
II

0-10
11-20

4 6 or g re a_t e r

scale 1n miles:.
I .,

0

E3t#&amp;N

2

.. 3

N

�7·

f igure 5
1

3

SOil ASSOCiATIOf~ S

3

~ - associatioil number

2

scale

1n

miles

I ·

I

unru-n

0

1

2

3

N

�5. Kalkaska association: Deep, nearly level and gently sloping, well drained
and moderately well drained soila that have coarse textured subsoils.
Here again the soil ie not suitable for resource production uses but well
suited for intensive uses.

AREAS DOMINATED BY ORGANIC SOILS ON Ul'LANDS

6. Carbondale-Rifle-Tawas association: Nearly level, very poorly drained
organic soils.
These soils are poorly suited for either of tha usea because of unusual
wetness and organic soils present.

AREAS DOMINATED BY INTIMATELY ASSOCIATED LOAMY SOILS AND SANDY SOILS ON
UPLANDS

7. Kalkaska-Gogebic association: Deep, sloping to strongly sloping, well
drained soils that have coarse textured to medium textured subsoils.
The assoica.tion rates poor for resource production uses and suitable
for i11tenaive uses.

...

�viding food and cover.

Mixed forests of apruce, fir, birch, and aspen aro

found in the unfertile outwash. soils, giving way to stands of aspens or lush
willow in poorly drained areas.

Bogs and depressions, characterized by high

acid mucky peat soils and thin and roclcy or sandy soils have little value as
cropland or pasture because few types of vegetations are suited to these areas.

Sandy and silty loam aoils ~hich have been cleared are saitable for

pasture land, but forests and woodlands clearly dominate the landscape.

The

types of vegetation in the Township can be seen in Figure 6Q
Wildlife
The original forests condi~iona were dramatically altered with the advent of logging at the turn of the century ..

Wildfires were probably never

uncommon, but because of the mosaic-like distribution of vegetative cover
and soil types they were also never very extensivae

Large scale clear cut-

ting destroyed this natural pattern cf firebrakes n:id allowed nurnerous larg~
fires to sweep across the p~ninsula between 1920 and ·1927, eo that changes
wrought by the axe were intensified by the flame.

Some animal species of the

deep, unbroken woods like the pine mar·ten, fisher, ond cougar disappeared com-

pletely, whereas a species like the coyote flourished with the extenaion of
humans into the forest.

Others like the wolf and lynx were able to retreat

before the timber cutter to the moat inaccessible habitat possible, where a
few remnant populations exist today.

oome animals, such as the pine me.rten,

fisher, otter, beaver, mink, muskrat, and black bear, suffered serious depletion because they were . valued

for fur and meat.

bear survived by virtue of their adaptability.

The mink, muskrat, and black
The elk and moose are extir-

pated species well adspted to a variety of habitats, but are hunted and are
not compatible with human activity.
The reverse situation occurred for many species who thrived on the vegetation in the clear-cut fields~

White-tailed deer, ruffled grouse, short-

tailed grouse, and snowshoe rabbit favored the large unbroken openings.

Ani-

mals that may have originally been absent from the region like oppoasum, fox
squirrel, thirteen-lined ground squirrel, and eastern mole, moved in.

In the

late 1930•s a major effort waa mode to reforest l~rge areas of tho Upper Peninsula.

This reversion back to a forested vegetative cover is resulting in a

lose of open and semiaopen habitat, which will eventually alter the type of
animal species again.

Deer •. The white-tailed deer is the most important game species in the
27

�area and their numbers are declining significantly due to depleted deer
ranges.

The total acreage of deer yards in the County is decreasing.

The

Dtm is currently bringing as many yards aa posaible under intensive manage-

ment.
Fish.

In cold streams and lakes brook trout and two forms of lake

trout are native to the area, while successful exotica include brown and
rainbow trouco

Large rivers and streams that mre too warm for trout have

fairly good populations of small mouth bass and northern pike, while other
warm water species like yellow perch, rock baas and bluegill dominate the
warm water lakes.

Fishing quality remains good and fishing pressures are

probably below that which the area could support.

Fish management activities

carried out by the DNR and the Forest Service include chemical rehabilitation,
fish stocking, and access development.

Waterfowl.,

A weather corridor of the Atlantic fiyway lies directly

over parts of Ishpeming Township.
ducks use this route annually.

An estimated 26,0CO to 75~000 diving

In addition to the migratory waterfowl

coming from breeding grounds far to the north, there are 12 to 15 species
kno~m locallyo

In addition to other watarfowl projects, the DNR is flooding

a number of small areas to provide more habitat for all wetland gan1e species,
both resident and migratory.
Future Statuse

The future of the mammals and birds, particul~rly ec(»o,

nomically important species like daer and grouse, depends almost entirely
upon the extent humans ar~ willing to indefinately a~rest the process of ·
secondary .forest succession or selectivity direct and control its progress.
Controlled hunting, trapping, and the disuse of pesticides will be particularly important for sorne endangered species, as will the establishment and
continuation ofwilderness or minimal-use areas.

The endangered, threatened,

or introduced species in the area are the eastern timber wolf, Canada lynx,
pine marten, fisher, moose, gray fox, southern bog lemming, water shrew, and
eastern pipistrelle.

The endangered birds in the area are the peregrine fal-

con, double-crested cormorant, Cooper•s hawk, red-shouldered hawk, osprey,
bald eagle, piping plover, loggerhead shrike and marsh hawk.

Multiple eagle

nesting sites are located in the southern part of the Township.
The preservation of wildlife depends ver:, much on land and water use
practices and on the degree foresters and wildlife managers are able to work
together in manipulating soil, vegetation and surface water impoundments to

�extremely cold drJ air which dominates the area until storms moving up from
the south can displa~e them.

The climate is an air masa controlled climate

Hnd because of this is relatively unpredictable as to severity from year to
year.

One of the moat valuable resources of Ishpeming To~mahip is the abundaace
of fresh water.,

There is t~e Dead River Storage Basin and the Deer :Lake Basin,

which account for 3,601 acres.

The Bear, Silver Mine, Rock, Cooper, and Big

Mud lakes cover another 183 acres.

The main ri,rers include the Carp, Dead,

Big and Little Garlic, and Yellow Doge

The Township also contains many tri-

butary creeks and small lakes and ponds.

An inv~ntory of Marquette County 1 :s

lakes, ponds, and reservoirs can be found in the Michigan Lske Inventory Bulletins, available from tha Michigan Department of Natural Resourcea Development.
The surface wat:ar resources of the Township are not extensively developed
at the present time because of the relatively low population and lack of urbanization.
this time.

Pollution of streams, lakes, and rivers is not a great problem at
Effluent f r om domestic septic tanks may cause local contamination

in some stre~ms.

With increased development, more efficinet waste-water treat-

me11t methods may be required at some locations.
Of particular concern is the amount of sediment allowed to enter the surface water from land adjacent to waterways.

Sediment degrades water quality,
\

destroys natural plant growth, transports nutrients, and decreases the water
carrying capacities of water courses.

The lowest sediment yields in the

Township can be expected from areas of exposed bedrock and areas of glacial
outwash deposits due to the coarseness of the materials.

However, increaaed

development and recreational use of lakes and streams and poor farming practices greatly increase sedimQnt yieldso

Some methods that should be employed

to minimize this problem include tributary diversions, seeding of ba:re hillsides, grading and minimized land al.terations.
Because water resources are so important for recreation, domestic use,
agriculture, dilution of waste water, and industry, they should be protected
and used in a: manner that •will ensure their quantity and quality for the f\i~
ture.

31

�7

■

Area .Producing
Meta ilie n1inerals

j! :1

Dense Mine Areas

Area \~ith
Potential Significance

Roe f&lt; Quarry

scale

1n

miles:

I .
0

2

3

N

�ownership is a significant factor in determining the best possible developmental pattern since so much land is owned by corporations and probably not
available for development.
Issues and Problems
Secondary forest succession is destroying the open habitat of several
species such as the white tailed dee:t and grouse,, The decreasing acreage of deer yards and depleted deer ranges have led to a decline in
the nurebers of white tailed deer.
Controlled hunting and trapping, and the disuse of pesticides is important to some endangered species, as well as the establishment and
continuation of wilderness and minimal use areas.
-

Water fowl management is needed to improve opportunitias to utilize this
resource. New floodings, planned refuges, and feeding areas must be developed to attract and hold these birds.

-

Activities such as increased farming, mining, and urban development
could loca~ly increase the rates of erosion and significantly alter
the present geologic environment within the immediate future.
In the expectation of increased future use and development, provisions
should be included in a zoning ordinance to protect steep areas from
the hazards of erosion and unneeded financial expencl.i ture, both public
and private.
County forests as a whole are in poor shape; the forest industry is in
poor shape; and the utilization of the forest resource is poor. There
is an over-utilization of high-quality hardwood and an under-utilization
of small and low quality hardwood .. Forest based industries need to be
expanded to remove the present surplus of low-grade wood.

-

There is a lack of forest management on forest land owned by non-industrial landownerso Expanded and improved forest management can also contribute substantially to improving the habitat for wildlife.
The in~ortance of both medium grade and extensive low grade metallic
mineral deposits is increasingo By the year 2000, the Lake Superior
district will be the principal domestic source of ore. Although no
mines are currently operating in the Township, the iron ore mining industry will be impor~ant to the economy of the Township and company
policies on land acquisition, development over known deposits, waste
disposal, future expansion, and life of deposits should be inputs to
the Township Zoning Ordinance.

-

Both soils and geology need to be considered in future pollution control
measures. Sanitary landfills and sewage lagoons must be located in a
areas where ·soils and bedrock are suitable for these purposes.

35

�Employed Persons 14+ Years by Industry

Ra.&gt;lk

Industn

Total

Percent

1.

Mining

287

35.70

2.

Wholesale &amp; Retail Trade

114

14 .. 21

3.

Professional and Related
Services

101

12 .. 60

Manufacturing, Durable Goods

35

4o40

Hanufacturing, Non-Durable
Gooda

5.,
6

Cumulative
Percent

Male

Femia le

l:,1

60

27

8

39

10

29

Industr-j' Not Repoi•tad

60

35

25

Construction

42

30

12

Transportation

32

27

5

Business &amp; Repair Services

23

13

10

Personal Services

22.

2 .. 70

9

10 ..

Public Administration

21

2.,60

18

13
3

11.

Finance 9 Insurance~ and
Real Estate

18

2o20

8

10

Entertainment and Recreation
Services

10

1.20

100.0

5

5

0

0

100 .. 0

0

0

1,052.4

555

4.

9.

12.

Agriculture, Forest!"J" and
Fisheries
TOTAL

1

804

62.4
66.8

8804
91.3
94.o
96.6

Cumulative percent is plotted on the Lorenz-Curve, Figure

Source:

1970 Census

Employment Diversity
One measure of economic stability is an evaluation of employment diversity.

A well diversified labor force will minimize the economic hard-

ship produced by the elimination of an employment sector.
ship has a low level of diversification.

Ishpeming Town-

The highest concentrations of

people are employed in mining ( 35. 7%), wholesale and retai 1 trade ( 14. 2%) ,.
and professional and related services (12.6%). According to the 1970 census, there is no employment inthe forestry, agriculture, and fisheries
industry; and a lov level of employment (below

3%)

in finance, insurance,

�T!JI' AL
Etvd'I.OY!-.1)

ll,\/liK

t.
2.

I, 1611,540

!V1:,m1f:ictul'in9

Clll',llL,\Tl VE

"~i!'Lun:o

•'

'"

curv,u-

l

ll:\NK

STllY

LATIVt:.

'#,

EMPLOYED

91

32.6

32.6

l',ai,ufocturing

54

19.3

51.9

3.

Professional and
Related s,~rvices

28

10.0

61.9

1.

Transportation nnd
Communication

23

8.2

70.1

I.

8J -l ,'1J I

:

TOTAi.
f:l'-,l'LOYEO

t,·; lnlng

:M.64

Prnf,~s~ ion.1 I and

HeL1tL'd Sc-r,·ices

3.

'N

59,38

\o/ho1&lt;·sale~~ ()Cld

Retail Tritde

4')·1,227

-1.

Tr;,n,;portation

170,JOS

5.04

79.07

5.

C0nst1·uction

153,637

4.61

83.68

5.

Wlioles.:ilc &amp; llctail

22

7.9

78.0

Fin:ulcc, Insurance,
Real Estat,:-

21

7.5

85.5

3.36

87.54

6.
6.
7.

Construction

130,464

lndustrr Not Reported

20

7.2

9?..7

7.

Public ,\dministrntion 12'1, 954

3.70

91, 24
8.

Personal Services

8.

Personal Services

116, 185

3.44

94.68
9.

Public .Ac..lminisctration

9.

Business and llclatcd
Services

10.

11.

8J,338

Agriculture, Forestry,
Fislwries
58,707

74.03

2.47

97. 15

93.89

1. 74

Enlel'tn inrnent and
Recreation

21,677

.64

99.53

12.

t,,ining

13,880

.41

100.00

13,

Industry not Reported

0

0

100.00

10.

_11.

12.

13.

3,372,548

INDUSTRY

I,

Professional and
Related Services

2.

5

1.9

100.0

Recrc.ntion

0

0

100.0

Finance, Insurance, and
Real Estate

O

0

100.0

Business and Related
Services

0

0

100.0

Agriculture, Forestry,
and Fisheries

0

0

100.0

279

100.0

1,070.8

Entertainment and

100.00 1,099.83

~IAKQlJ ~;rrn COUNTY Ei'lPLOYi'v, r.NT

RANI,.

93.1

ISHPEl'll:,G CfTY Ei'IPLOYMENT

1
CUMU-

TOT.AL
EMPLOYED

%

LATIVE

H ·IPLOYED

o/o

5,309

27.4

CUi\'iU-

•',.

LJ\TIVE

TOTAL
EMPLOYED

E~1PLOYED

RANK

fNDUSTRY

1,

Mining

804

27. l

27. 1

2.

Wholesale and Retail
Trade

677

22.8

19.9

Professior.al and
Related Services

444

15.0

64.9

27.4

Wholesales and Retail
Trade

4,127

21.2

48.6

3.

Mining

3,210

16.4

65.0

4.

Public Administration

1,435

7.6

72.6

4.

l'·J anuiacturing

312

10.5

75.4

5.

Transportation and
Commuuication

160

5.4

80.8

6.5

79.1

5.
5.

Public .~dministration

1,302

6.

6.

/vianufacturing

1,227

6.3

85.4

Transportation and
Communication

158

5.3

36.1

7.

Persa1al Services

850

4.5

89.9

7.

Industry Not Reported

140

4.7

90,8

8.

Constnx:tion

748

3.9

93.8

8.

Personal Services

95

3.2

94.0

9,

l'in-,nce, Insurance, and
Real Estate

9.

597

3.2

97.0

Finuncc, Insurance, and
Real Estate
65

2.2

96.2

!lusin&lt;&gt;ss and Helated
Set",icPs

10.

Construction

63

2. l

98.3

3•10

1.8

98.8
11.

Agricultu1·e, For·cstry,
a11c..l Fisheri£:s

23

.8

!lusiness and Related
Scr·vicc,s

19

.6

3.

10.

It.

,\fJriculture, Fore~! 1·y,
and l'isherii,s

i66

.8

99.6
1~.

12.

• Entc..-rtainnu~nr nnd
RPC1"t"'•;:1t ion s,. t·,·ices

75

l:l.

13.

Industry Not Report&lt;Jd

0

1'),J&gt;l(i

99.7

100.6
0

100.0

100.0 1,037.2

Entc-1·tairirnent ,,net
llec:rcation Srr\"lccs

9

.3

100.0

2,96?

100. 0

!. (ll,:!. :J

1 CunH11~1t lvc tolills wcr~ plottc•d 011 ti1e l.orc•!17.-Cu.-v,-' in ot·&lt;lt-r to tn~a.sure lndt1~trial r!ivPr.• dc;1tion.

}9

1

�FIGURE 9

LORENZ

CURVE

100

95
90

85
80

75
70
65
a
LI.I

&gt;-

60

C

.J
0..
~

55

I-

50

w

z

w

q

0:::

w

45

0..

40 .

35
30

25
20
15

10

5

0

2

3

4

6

5

INDUSTRY

BY

4oa

RANK

7

ORDER

�Table l i I
Marguette Counti
Total Business Establishments &amp; Payrolls
( excludes government employees, railroad employees, &amp; self-employed persons)
Number of Employees

Number of Establishments With
Payrolls

Taxable Pa:rrolli Jan.-Mar.

($1,000)

% Char.ge

o/_,

1970

1975

1970-1975

11,588

13,095

13.0o/o

116,778

10

12

20.0o/o

I

3,120

A

NA

407

504

1,318

ransportation, Comm uniations and Public Utilities
fholesale Trade

'otal

~griculture, Forestry,
.nd FisheriEs

.

1ining

:ontract Construction
'1 anufacturing

1970

1975

1970

1975

o/o Change
1970-1975

946

1,158

22.2o/o

Char:ge

1970-1975

27,656

64. WYo

16

12

-25.0o/o

4

7

75.0o/o

6,841

(D)

NA

9

(D)

NA

23.So/o

752

1,299

72. 7o/o

1,181

-10.3o/o

1,834

2,298

522

654

25.3o/o

1,002

604

731

21.0o/o

969

I

71

94

32. 4o/o

25.2o/o

I
I

56

55

-1. 8o/o

1,693

68.9o/o

I

36

45

25.0o/o

2,000

106.Jo/o

71

91

28.2%

339

386

13.Bo/o

NA

87

100

14.9%

103.9%

280

316

17. Oo/o

3

51

1600.0o/o

·--

2,607

etail Trade
inance, Insurance, and
eal Estate

533

ervices

3,251

24. 7o/o
NA

B

2,261

3,816

723

(D)

2,439

3,115

27. 7o/o

2,372

4,837

8

100

1150.0o/o

8

51

nclassified Est.ablishm ents

68.7%

900.~

'j

,t

2,500 -4,999 employees
500 - 999 employees
I;

Withheld to avoid disclosure of operations of individual establishments

ource:

County Business Patterns, 1970 and 197 5.

---

·-

�Employed Persons 16 Years+ by Occupation

County
Number

Township

Perc@nt .

Professional and
Technical

2,929

15.1%

107

13.5%

Managers and Proprietors, excapt farm

1,362

7.Cf/o

46

Clerical and Sales

4,401

22 .. 7%

146

5 .. 8%
18.4%

Craftsperson

2,721

Operative a

2,567

14.0C/4
13.2%

197
159

Drivers

955

4.9%

30

Laborers, e,rcept farm

790

4.o%

26

97

.. 5%

0

3,303
261

17.0%

77

9.7%

1.3%

2

.6%

Farm

&amp;

Farm Laborers

Service
Private Household
TC'TAL

Source:

19,386

2L~.,8%
20.1%

3.8%
3.3%
0

793

1970 Census

The three largest occupations for Marquette County are clerical and

sales, service, and professional and technical.

The three largest for tha

Township are clerical and sales, craftspersons, and operatives.

The last

two directly relate to the. mining industry.
A rapidly increasing sector of the work force is women.

In 1970,

women made up 31% of the work force in Ishpeming Township a.-id ere now

probably near the 1977 state level of 4056. According to the Michigan Department of Labor, women earn 60% of what men earn, and women find it
difficult to enter all save a few traditional vocatio~...f3. In 1970, the
highest percentage of woman in the Township were employed in the traditional clerical fdelds (41.4%) and service work (20.9%), 12.9% of whom
were food service workers. Moat of the professional women (19.7%) were
employed in the traditional fields of nursing (7.2%) and teaching (4.0%).

44

�No figures are currently available for the number of w~lfare reci-

However, figures are available for
While per capita income has increased, po-

pients residing in Ishpeming Totmship.
the County and central region.

verty in the central region remains very high.

In terma of the total fami-

lies living in poverty, the central region has '11.2% and the state 7.3%.
The percentage of families in the region receiving public assistance is 17.9%,
four times greater than -i.:he state percentuge of 4e2"/b.

When considering unre-

lated individuals living in poverty, the regional percentage of 12.4 is over
two and a half times grea-ter than the state percentage of 4.9.
i.ag table displays caseload:.:; by county.

The follow-

Narquette County contains

34% of

the assistance cases in the six county central region.
Assistance Cases - July 1977
Marguette

Central Region

Aid to Dependent Children

840

General Assistance

103

2058
297

Food Stamps

364

1347

Medical Assistance

592

1906

1902

5588

TOTAL

Source:

Assistance Payment Statistics 9 Department of Social Services

Income
Income is one measure of a community's wealth.

The income of a com-

munity's residents is relied upon to finance private as well as public improvements.

In 1970, the total aggregate income for families in the Town-

ship was $6,244,950 and for unrelated individuals it was $218,900.
dian family income range was $8,000 to $9,000.

The me-

In 1970, the average family

income was $9,534, which placed the Township third in rank among the other

Only Michigamme and Chocolay townships had higher
average family incomes. The average income for all males in the Township
14 years and o~der was $5,710 and for females 31,468.
townships in the County.

I

,.

�Local Ernployera
Eomloyees
Total
1.
2.

School - Westwood, North Lake, and
West Ishpeming

92

Mather Nursing Home

60

Part-Time

3. Miracle IGA Market

40

4o

Ishperniug Steel Corporation

5.
60
79
8.
9.

Northern Tire Shop

30
17

Dentist's Office

15

Hooper-Stanaway Ford Garage

14

Sawyer-Stoll Wood Preserving Company

1l•

Township Staff

12

2

100

Snyder Drug Store

11

2

11$

Ted's Paint Store

10

120

Ace Hardware Store

6

13. Bonovich Builders

7

14.

Pajula and Maki Contractors

150
16e

Poirier's Motel and Gas Station
Juntti Service Station

5
4

17.

Triangle Motel

9

2

4

3

18. Pen West Bank

2

19.

Pete 9 s Service Station

2

20.

Sunnyside Estates Mobile Home Park

2

21.

Ruona Excavating

1

22.

Suburban Motel

1

23.

Joan's Beauty Shop

1
TOTAL

Source:

28

353

3

46

Marquette County Planning Commission Telephone Survey, 1978

According to the above list made in 1978, there are approximately 353
jobs within the To~mship.

the Township.

In 1970, there was s work force of 804 people in

The County's work force has grown by an average of 7.2:J{, per

48

�CHAPTER !V
LAND USE

Introduction
The variety of land uses observable on the landscape are n result of
many influences, both human imd natural.

Land uses that have develop,a d in

the township are a result of the decisions made by many individuals, families, business people and government officials and, aa such, are not a pro-

duct of comprehensive planningo

Rather, the present development patter;1

can be attributed to tradition, economic influences, changing social patterns, etco

Such land use practices have resulted in haphvzard develop-

ments and ra:i.xetl land use probl~ma.

'l~~us, careful decisions and efficient

allocation of land for various uses at appropriate locations are necessary
for deriving th~ maximum benefits of land use and to improve the quality
of living.

In m~der to do this, it ia necessary to understand the existing

patterns of land u.se ~nd the possible

limiting factors thet could influ-

ence futura developments and potentials of land use in Ishpeming Town~hipo

The analysis was conduc-1:ed at two levels .. Information gathered from
secondary sources vas obtained and geuerai trends were analyzed. Land uaa
information was also obtained through field inspection and analyzed on an
individual basise The following objectives were established to guide the
analysis.
-

Determine the typ~j character and amount of each major land useo

-

Evaluate the a~propriateness of past land use practices. ·

-

Identn·y potentials and J.irni tationa for expansion of residential, commercial, •industrial and public land uses.

-

Identify the areas that are suitable for intensive development and that
have high resource production potential. ·

-

Evaluate the land ownership pattern and its impact on land usa.
Provide a source of information for future planning and possible revisions of development controls.

Location and Size

Ishpeming Township is north centrally located in Marquette County and
occupies 92.5 square miles or approximately

5% of the total County area.

Townships bordering Ishpeming Township include Powell to the north, Champion
and Ely to the west, Tilden to the south, and Marquette and Negaunee to the east.
The cities of Negaunee and Ishpeming make up the Township's southeast boundary.

50

�available and more expensive, forcing people to locate in the surrounding
townships.

Recently, the expansion of the Cleveland Cliffs mining opera-

tions has resulted in in-migration, and development in the township ia expanding to meet the needs of an increasing population.
Factors Affecting Land UBe
Land use change has been the result of various decisions made by individuals, families, business persons, public agencies and so forth.

It io

of significance to note that the decisions m~de by various individuals and
groups are oriented to their own self-interest and that there is usually no attempt made to coordinate their activities for overall community improvement

or to consider the effect of such development on eurrounding land uises, utilities, services, etc. This haphazard decision-making process has often
resulted in scattered develepments and incorni,atible land uses.
Public agencies such as federal, state, county 9 and 'oit;y governments
play a very important role in land use changes.

The federal government exer-

cizes a number of resp~naibilities that affect land use through various loan
and grant programs for such p~rposea aa plam1ing, public housing, urban renewal, water and sewers etc.

Other than funding, they have little control

on the direction and magnitude of land use change.

T~e role of State has traditionally been limited to providing enabling
legislation to local go·~ernmen"tB to regulate growth and developments. However, some of the decisions rnade by the State, such as highway location, ~ill
obviously affect land use changes~ If public health powars were stringently
exercized by the State, it would affect land use changes in areas dependent
upon septic tanks for aevage disposal.
Among other factors, the transportation system has a great influence on
land use changes.

The expanding highway network has permitted the small town

and rural residents to commute to larger cities for employment and specialized
services, which in turn has exerted major influences on the land use patterns
within the communities.

Tha increased mobility offered by the highways has

also facilitated the strip development of rural non-farm residences along
these highways, ·thus influencing land use change from agriculture .or forestry
to residential.

At the same time, the increased mobility has placed additional

demands on outdoor recreational facilities in rural areas, thus influencing
land use conversion processes.

52

�Some scattered residential development has taken place along County Road
510.

Residential atructures consist of the following types:

apartment

buildings, duplexes, single family dwellinga, mobile homes, and attached,
seasonal and vacant dwellings.

Residential areas account for approximately

4'+7 acres.
Commercialo
US-410

Moat commercial establishments are located adjacent to

'fhese establishments include service stations, motels, a f!70ceey

store, a radio shop, a hardware ator~a dentist to office, a bank, and an
auto dealership.

Industrial.
of th9 to~nahip.

Commercial uses account for about ·16 acres.
Industrial uaes are scattered around the southern p~rt

Th@ industries include the . Iahpeming Steel Corporation,

the Sawyer Stoll Wood Preserving Co~, an industrial tire service, construction companies, and the gravel pits.

Industrial uaes account for about

26

ac:r.es.
Public-Quasi Public.

Public uses are located within the develowed areaao

These include the schools, the playgrotmd, chi1rches, the cemetery, tho town-

hall, the fire .hall, the ball diamond, tennis courts 9 snowmobile trails, and
the Elks Club picnic area.
Agricultural.

Public uses account for about 38 acres.

A limit,ed amount of agricultural production is taking

place along county roads GP, GA.A, and 573.

These areas, ~p~roximately 390

acres, are used for pasturage or fodder production.
The above uses can be seen on land use maps 1, 2, tlnd 3- (Figures 12, 13,

14, and 15)
Land

Ownership
The three categories of land ownership utilized in this analysis are

coz,porate, private, and governmental.
listed balow.

The acreage in each category is

�Figure 13
T

I
I1

D€:"1; ~l\'/"'1'1 1•n1

•
•••
••••
f""r- - - •
■
•
·
•
•
■
■fl
■
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . lli

·.. .
~ .. ·...
-:-:■:•. :-:■

·· :

I

.TO\VNSHIP

~

,.

I

~

MAP ONE

It

.,

.,

c-:•:•.:•:❖.:-:•:•-·
C··•·••-i"'..

1l·

1. •::: :-:•::: :\'. •.'.

•••••••••• '( :: :

I

LAND USE

:-:• :•

r.·.·•:•.·.·•:•.·.·

c-:-: ~-:-:-:--:-:-:
~-.· .-....·.· ·.·.·.· ......
&gt;-:•::::,:-::::.:-:: :iii\\
r::•.·.·-:•.·.·•:•.·.
_·::::
r • • ••• •• ••• •• ·.•, .

r,,,f\

h] li'~ I"' tJ\o Iu\1 fU

...
H

I

::t

•

' "·

.

3

~I

l:
,'

..

~

:

ROCK

EI

r!!/\j\~:,:::~ ~;~~f: ~;. .": · ·

w

"'

l~ !
~'." •'

\

·~ :~~?''v-

1

j

t

!

'&amp;

~,•••:,rt&gt;t:,·
•
~~

!;~!"4 '1\lil\\lr- ,ii\il\\il11

·••

;.

1

\'1J::
11 ,
......... . '

1ill 1;1:·1::::1
'::::!,~ ::::
··"•!!!!!
•!"'1.. ,&gt;ti!!••J:\11 ::: 'I :?~:: ::··
!!!!!{}! •:•:•:•:::

' I
Ir I

I · ..,. . . .. f""''•"I
~
l.
L)

"'f__;.

i

I ---

l

I

· •,-

- ~,;j;.L.AKE
!ii.

~:i
I

NORT

I

"'""'"

I

,
mm\i
. \L_______
1
1·

..

::m

+:~•1•·•t'!%n.tu;;"1Cff•·"·

··l.•·• ...• • •...· •....• 1
. . ··
•:• •/ m
" ....

\!! : :

?1•11~~~-[~!i.,!

· ··· ·~--ul·· ·
:Hi!! 'rrtillJ}m:i :J

ITTITI7 Residen.t _
ial'

llilliliill

Commercial

[ ] Public Semi Publi_c
Industrial

~!: .:\[:\\:\:\

:
1

m• ::-.

~~~:-~~l:~•m;.N?:1.:. iv•J~ST
. ·•It
·:::\:::::: M:W~R. »-.=,

lsHPEMING

·,u ;· ··· ·:
I

""'

!.

.....

--- --------

_,,.

so~r. .£:,q
SCALE -

•
· 1.

-&gt;.;;.:-:mJ%'a
FEET

�· Figure •15

ISi~~PEfvUNG .TOt'U~!SHIP
LAND USE
MAP 3

LEGEND
0

□

·

·f,,m,,,:5

YEAR-ROUND

□ -RESIDENCES

INTENSIVE SEASONAL

g,,::::M -DEVELOPMENT

58

9

~
SCALE- MILES

�Major Land ~nera

Approximate-

Acreage
1.

Clevelani Cliffs T-ron Company

2.

.Percent of
Total Area

14,600

24 .. 6'.;f.

Gannon Lumber Corp.

6,194-

10.4%

3.

North Woods Products, Inc.

5,3?8

9.1%

4.

U.ti. Steel Copp ••

4,067
2,746

6.. 9%

5. Nakoosa-Edwards Paper Co.
60 Michland, Inc ..
7. Kidder and Gotschall

8. l!;scanaba hllp Co.
9. Longyear Realty Co~.
10.

Connor Forest Industry-

3.9%

2,332
1,707

2.9,6

1,,~o

2 .. 4%

1,300

2 .. 2%

1,280

41,0o4
Source:

4.616

2 .. 2%

69.2%

Marquett2 County Atlas and Plat Book, 1973.

Conclusion
The development patterns in Ishpeming Township range from compact to
scattered and have often occurred in a strip or lineal form along major
roads.

These development patterns can be attributed to several factors

such as soils, highways, topography, accessibility, and land ownerehip.
For example, minimal development has occurred in outlying areas because

of the lack of accessibility and the large percentage of lands owned by
corporations.

Most of the recreational or seasonal development haa oc-

curred along the Dead River Basin.

The intensive land uses have occurred

in the West Ishpeming location because . of the accessibility offered by H\-fY• US-41.

Because of the Township's increasing population and expanding development, several problems need to be addraased in order to ensura orderly·
growth.

One problem is that the commercial strip along highway U.S. 41 is
developing in a haphazard fashion.

With each new establishment, one or

. more driveways are added to U.S. 41, creating potential traffic hazards.
Also, the coat of providing needed utilities and services to lineal developments along major roads is prohibitively high.

60

�Issues and Problems
-

The majority of the Township (98%) land can be categorized as open
space, which means it is· undeveloped.

A limited amount of agricultural production is taking place along
Gounty roads GP, GAA, and 573.
Scattered development is increasing in outlying areas. If not properly planned for, this development may result in higher service and
utilities costs or may cause pollution hazards due to high water tables
or poor soil conditions.
-

Some scattered development has taken place along County Road 510.
A lineal pattern of residential land use has developed along portions

of County roads GP and 573 and around periph':!ral areas of the Dead
River Basin.. Lineal developments result in higher service and util5.ties costs.
-

The commercial strip along highway US-41 is developing in a haphazard
fashion which could result in traffic hazards and in increasing lineal
or strip de,relopment.
Over the last ten years, the demand for industrial, commercial, and
~esidential/recreational land use has increa~ed. However, a limited
supply of land is avaibble since almost 707/J of the land in the Township is corporately owned. ~bis situation has caused a sharp increase
in property values.

62

�Vehicles.

Automobiles, buses, trucks, and trains are the basic vehicle

types operating within the Townahip.
in transporting persons or cargo.

Each has its o~m function and effioiency

In terms of use, on a national level the

auto accounts for approximately 85 to 90 percent of total travel on freeways,
arterials, and local streets.
vel.

Trucks account tor most of the remaining tra-

The number or percentage of trips made by bus or rapid transit varies

widely depending upon density, physical,and economic characteristics of the
study nrea.

Bus and rapid transit services a.re currently not provided

1;1fl

th-

in the To~mship • .
Terminal Facilitieso

A terminal is any facility providing for the de-

livery, receipt, or temporary storage of freight or the vehicle itself~

~bese

facilities also include points of passenger embarkation and areas desig-~ed for
the temporary storage of passenger vehicles.

Off-street parking, garages, and

lots are forms of terminal facili·ties as are railroad yards, airports, truck
terminals, and docks4

T'ne terminal facilities in Ishpeming Township involv~

roadway related stops.
The Circulation Subsystems and the PlanninG Commission
It is essential that the Township Plan.~ing Commission has an understanding of elements of the transportation system and their inter-relationship to be able to plan effectively for the present and future.

Although

all three sub-systems are importimt, the Planning Commission must realize
it has little or no control over the vehicle subsystem.

On the other hand,

the Commission can often make decisions which will directly influence the
maintenance, function, or location of travelways.

The location of terminal

facilities can also be influenced through actions of the Commission, for example, by the creation of off-street parking provisions.
Non-Highway and Extra-Township Trans~ortation
Highways and streets are the primary pathways of transportation within
Ishpeming Township.

However, other modes of transportation provide important

service to Township residents as well.
Air Service.

'.!:he Marquette County Airport, throug~ North Central Air-

lines and a local charter flying company, provides commercial or commuter
passenger and cargo services.

The airport is located approximately 8 miles

�of the County's Motor Vehicle Highway fund, (after an ap~roximate 10% deduction for other e~T,enditures) is alloted for County primary roads.

Town-

ships are not responsible for primary road expenditures.
In Ishpeming Township, 5&lt;Yt6 of the primary roads are not paved and are
conaidered "inadequate'' by the County Road Commission for the amount or
type of traffic they support.
County L-0cnl Roads$

The County local roads within the Township con-

stitute all C.:.mnty roads not included in the primary system.,

I~ should be

noted that the "local" {as well as "primary") designation here represents
a state-county legal classification which pertains primarily to road financing$

It is not to be confused with a later discussion on the functional

classifications (local - collector - arterial) of the Township's roadwayso
Unlike the primary system 1 only 59% (28,.5 miles) of the County local
road network is maintained and plowed on a year-round basis~

Another dif-

ference is ~hat 25% of the previously mentioned Motor Vehicla Highway Fund
is typically utilized for the local ro~ds.

Horeover, property tax revenues

are often necessary for road construction since local county road funds
must generally be matched by local township funds.,

Approximately 33~'6 of

the local county roads are unpaved and are considered "inadequate" by the
Marquette County Road Commission,.

A composite of the type and condition

of the Countr roads within the Township can be seen in Table IV.

With

the exception of the platted areas,•the Township 0 s network of plowed roads
is depicted in

Figure 16.

Classification of Roads
Roads, the primary component of the circulation system, have v~rious
functions.

While many roads carry strictly local traffic, others carry

high volumes of through traffic.
between tha above mentioned types.

Still others serve aa connective links
Roads, therefore, may be categorized

according to( their predominant functions and community service character•

istics.

Several benefits may be realized by road classification:::according

to function.
a.

9

Such a system together with traffic volume information may:

Provide a framework for the formulation of land use policies regarding properties located near or adjacent to roadways.

66

�Figure 116

ISHPEMING TOvVNSHIP
COUNTY

sys-, EM

ROAD

,,----__ COUNTY ROAD {PLOWED)
- - - _ ;. -- C OUN TY R O AD ( U N PLO W E. P)
:
- - ..... -----..-,
_.

"".:
I
..........
'/

I
I

I
I

I

a.
(.'.)

us

41

~)

I

'SEE
:

I

MAP2'

I

MAP I

p

I

I

"---- - - - - - - - J

NIL.ES

g

I

N

I

r

t)

__J
(.9

GK

PO
MAP 2

O
I

i

,12
I

MILES

�Collector.

The collector street or road, also primarily a residential

phenomenon, is necessary for -the efficiency and accomodation of shorterhaul local traffic.

Basically, collector streets will have faster design

speeds, greater right-of-way widths, better grades of pavement, etc., than
local streets.
The primary function of this roadway type is to collect and distribute
traffic between local streets and arterial thoroughfares.
they filter and conduct

Occasionally,

traffic to such local ganerators as shopping cen-

ters,schools, or community centers.
Land access should be

a s~condary

function of a collector and should

be reflected in its operation and design.
ting driveways should be discouraged.

On-street parking and intersec-

As in the case of the local roadway,

a collector often functions as an easement for utilities, as an open space

furnishing light and air, and as a design element in residential areas.
Arterials.

Arterials typically have wider lanes and shoulders, faster

design speeds and less impeded traffic movement than the aforementioned
road types.
The first and moat important funtion of the arteri.::il is to move large
volumes of vehicles, such as cars, trucks, and busses and includes,

as

the

name artery implies, larger trips from geographic point to another.
If possible, access from residential areas to these thoroughfares
should not be via local streets but, rather, by collectors.

Although land

access should be a secondary fu..ction of arterials, owners usually have a
legal right to access.

Historically, traffic brought people, people brought

trade, and trade led to commercial development.

Zoning has tended to per-

petuate the location of commercial strips on many sections of arterials
while the design of streets and the development of abutting properties has
not recognized the problem created by increasing traffic volumes.

Parking

on arterial streets should be discouraged and, fortunately, is one function
that is being increasingly controlled due to the pressure of increased traffic volumes.

The arterial also serves as an easement for utilities and as

an open space, providing light and air.

The greater width of arterials

creates an opportunity for impressive design, but this opportu~ity has seldom been utilized.

Utility poles, advertising signs, billboards, and taste-

less architecture all contribute in making arterials the ugliest streets in
urban America.

�One of its functions is to serve as a collector or connective link be-

tween the above mentioned roads for urban ail,d rural residents of illshpeming
and Tilden Townships.
Another important function of Stoneville Road is that of indirectly
providing access to County Road 476, a vital link between the County work
force and industrial suppliers, and the Tilden and Palmer mining operations.
T'nis twofold function suggests that Stoneville Road be assigned a collector classification.
Other Roads (Collectors).

Becau~e of their distributive and shorter-

haul local traffic characteristics, it is suggested that County Road 583
south of US-41 (RandaJ!Drive) and County Road 583 north of US-41 (North
Lake Road) be designated as local collectors~

The same applies to County

Road 573 (Deer Lake Road) and County Road 510.
All roads or streets which are not shown in Fig.16 should be classified

as local roadwayse
Problem Areas
US-41.

Several problems currently oxist which reduce the effectiveness

of US-41 in moving traffic quickly, safely, and effici.ently through and within the Township.
ao

They are listed as follows:

The thoroughfai'e, a portion of which is only two lanes, was not designed to
carry the large volume of traffic or the heavy loads which it
· now carries.

b.

A number of local residential streets intersect the thoroughfare
since it is the only major arterial through the Township.

c.

Adjacent strip development and accompanying direct access points
have occured along much of the highway's length because of the
favorable commercial demand often associated with arterials.

These problems, if let unchecked, will only be intensified in the future.

The expected increases in To~mship (and County) population and re-

creational activities will increase the demand for effective transportation
facilities.
Unfortunately, the existing conditions limit improvements to pavement
widening, signalization, and channelization.

It is extremely important for

both safety and convenience that improvements to this vital route be made
promptly.

72

�Spot Residential De,relopment.

Continued residential spot development

on seasonal and some rural roads creates havoc with the transportation system and places a burden not only on the County Road Commission but the Town-ship as well.

Various County and Township services are required as outlying

areas are converted to year-round uses.

Because these services involve high

unit time-cost distancesand generally benefit a few people, the cost per person ratio is extremely high in thoselocations.
Land use controls and the abandonment of roads in areas which should

not be haphazardly developed-can allow revenues and other resources to be
used where there is a greater need.
Development on Collectors.

Residential development along collector

type roadwGys presents a very real traffic nazard.

Short sight distances

due to hills and curves typifies many of the Township's collectors.

1"hia,,

especially when combined with the situation -of lots directly fronting these
roads, jeopardizes the goal of safe and efficient traffic movements.

Land

use regulations can be utilized to limit access points along these roadways ..
Sight distances can only be improved as expenditures allow.
Secondnr,- Priority Hems
1.

Consideration should be given to the feasibility and effectiveness
of an official township commuter parking lot. Such a facility
would promote the use of ca-r pools as means of -transportation to
the various e:ctra-township arees of employment.,

2o

Areas with scenic values along roads should be recognized and
preserved or enhanced where possibleo Deed restrictions, limited
tree cuttlng 1 increased building setbacks, the prohibition of unnecessary signs, and related land use controls are some means of
achieving this objective.

3. While allowing for sufficient provisions for road related transport modes, whenever possible the Township should support or encourage alternative mobility methodso Bicycle paths linking recreational areas and open spaces, and hiking-jogging trails leading outward from the urban areas are two examples of alternative
modes.

74

�CHAPTER VI

RECREATION

Introduction
In this chapter of the Ishpeming Township Comprehensive Plan the importance of recreation in sustaining an acceptable condition of living will
be stressed.

The chapter is basically a reiteration of the Ishpeming Town-

ship Recreation Plan.

It's specific purposes are to:

1.

Identify a,1d classify existing recreation resources in the Township.

2.

Identify those resources that serve the ·Township located outside its
boundaries.

3.

Present roles and responsibilities of the Township and County.

4.,

Present elements, natural and human ) influencing projected recreation needs and evaluati-ons.

5.

Recommend goals and objectives which may be used as· guidelines regarding capital improvments and other -policies.

Recreation Administration
The Ishpeming Township Board established a To,...mship Recreation Committee
at it~ February, 1977 board meeting.
bers.

Tne recreation committee has five mema

The members were appointed to the committee by the Township supervisor

with the a1?proval of the Township board.
members before appointments were made.

T'.ae Township board advertised for
The recreation committee regularly

meets on the fourth Tuesday of each month.
The recreation committee is advisory in nature and assists the Township
board in setting recreatio~ development priorities and in recreational program development.

The Township has a general maintenance crew of four people

who have responsibilities for recreational maintenance.
The Township is involved in recreation programming, however, much of the
recreation programming for this part of Marquette County is sponsored by the
NICE School District.
Township funds are budgeted for recreation.
bu~gets for Township recreation.

Below is FY77 and FY78

�Trail Type Facility Inventory
One of the Township's most plentiful recreational resources are its
trailse

Secondary collector roads, railroad grades, electrical, telephone,

and pipeline distribution systems all. supply trails for hunting, fishing,
cross-country skiing, hiking, and off-road vehicles, although most of these
trails are located well outside the residential area.
Al Quall - Snowmobile tr·a il
Cross-Country trail
Ishpeming-Michigamme Snowmobile 'frail
Cooper Lake - Westwood High School Trail
Unofficial Cross-Country trail
Regional Facilities Servfng Ishpeming Townshir_
Facilities outside the Township qualifying as regional or special
~urpose may include:
Presque Isle Park
Van Riper State Park
Shiras Park
Ottowa National Forest
Michigamme State Forest
Escanaba River State Forest
Programs
Ishpeming Township is currently involved in recreational programming
for softball at the existing Township recreation area.

Programming takes

place during the spring and summer months.
All other recreation programs are sponsored by the Community Schools,
NICE School District.

The location of the programming is at the Westwood

High School.
The following programs are offered by the community schools:
Time of Year

Program
Golf

Summer

Basketball

All Jear

Tennis

Summer--

Skii_ng

Winter

78

�Figure II on page 4 of the Ishpeming Township Recreation Plan shows
some possible areas in the Township which were tentatively identified as
potential picnic areas and playground areas.
Further information regarding recreation may be found in the Ishpeming
Township Recreation Plan, dated April, 1977, and the Ishpeming Township Recreation Area

11

Si te Plan" dated 2/10/78.

Issues and Probl6ms
-

There are several key issues which are affecting and may effect recreation development and recreation use in Ishpeming Township. T'ne
issues are:
1. Lack of available land
~" Potential iron ore mining
3~ Population pressures from Tilden Township
4. Increases in population growth

-

The availability of land has been and continues to be an issue of great
concern to the residents of Ishpeming Township .. Many of the efforts to
provide public facilities and areas in this part of Marquette Countj
have
. been thwarted by the lack of available land.
.

-

Areas directly north of uS-41, H;.;;28 have kno1:m iron ore deposits.. Mining of this area could effectively split the Township in two. Provision of services to all Township residents would become a major problema

-

The northern -part of Tilden Township, adjacent to the major developed
portion of Ishpeming Township, is experiencing much new developmento
This part of Tilden To,,.mship is more closely geographically-related to
Ishpeming Township than to the remaining part of Tilden Township. This
may cause increased use of the Ishpeming Township recreational facilities
beyond what would be expected based on Ishpeming Township's population.
Ishpeming Township is expected to experience significant population increases over the next twenty years. Based on preliminary CUPPAD population projections, the population of the Township will double by the
year 2000. Planning for future recreational facilties should be done
with this in mind.

Bo

�concentrations have not been high enough to warrant concern or action.
While many municipalities are required to use chlorination, for example,
for disinfection (and occassionally flouridation) the Township's raw water is of
such a quality that it may be pumped directly _from the wells to the distribution
system without treatment.
Distribution Systemo

T'ne TO\•m ship publi~ -water system currently supplies

approximately 845 services.

Of .these, only nonresidential customers are metered

(residential users represent over 9o//o of the accounts).
Township's residences are serviced by the systemo

Approximately~82°/4 of the

Ar~as served by the system are

shotm ;i,n Figure 17.
With the notable exception of one subdivision
bution system basically consists of 6 inch mains.

(the Seilo Plat)

the distri-

Plans are currently under way

to convert the 4 inch main in the Seilo Plat to a 6 inch main.
Adequacy of Supply.
400,000 GPD

The wells currently produce an average of 300,000 to

(gallons per day), the lower figure representing winter consumption

and the latter, summer use ..

From this . it can be seen that the water supply in

Ishpeming Township is adequately supplying present everyday needs.
The system is capable of supplying substantially more water than the Township
presently requires

(including the new subdivisions Westwood I, Westwood II, and

Harrison Hills II)

as long as the wells continue to yield water at their present

rates.

This partially in view of the construction of the aforementioned new well

and storage facility.

Present daily consumption indicates that more than two

days demand of water will be available in storage. (this would also help greatly
in providing sufficient quantities of water for fire fighting purposes).
Wastewater
Ishpeming To~mship has two wastewater treatment plants which currently serve
approximately A:(~
.:,,
. customers.
~.[

·,

The "North Plant" serves the plat of North Ishpeming,

/ l·' I..,. -~part of which is in the 11 Deer Lake area" of the Township, and part of which is in

82

�the City of Ishpeming.

The "West Plant" serves the bulk of the Township's pop-

ulation which is situated from the plat of West Ishpeming westward.

The plants

were built simultaneously in 1962, and provide only primary treatment.
Waste disposal in the unserviced areas of the Township is primarily to individual septic tanks.

A few of the more remote dwellings still utilize pit privies.

While the lot acreage is large enough for safe disposal in many rural areas, land
use intensification~ high water tables, and/or poor soil ~onditions make individual
sewage disposal a health hazard in many ±nstanceso

Roughly 20% of the :population

is rural and without a centralized sewerage system.
The primary water problem in Ishpeming Township involves rehabilitating public
sewage treatmento

The Township is presently under Environmental Protection Agency

orders to upgrade the poorly-treated waste water effluents to federal standards by
1982..

The feasible treatment alternatives to overcome this deficiency as determined

by the Township's engineers include:
lo

A lagoon with irrigatio~ of effluent.

2.

Activated sludge treatment.

3.

Rotating biological discs.

The Tovmship and City of Ishpeming are currently negotiating possible arrangements to consolidate treatment facilities.

Conclusion
Wise planning decisions will be required for the improvement and extension of
the water distribution system as future demands for public water supply increase with
increasing population and expanding development.

The same applies not only to the·

expansion of the sewer system and required treatment facilities, but to the expansion of other utilities as well.

84

�CHAPTER VIII
COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Introduction
Community facilities may be defined as those structures and/or services
~n1ich provide public benefits that are not normally offered by the private
sector.

The number and especially the quality of such facilities often re-

flect the character of airldegree of pride in the community.

Furthermore,

communiiies with high standard structures and facilities are generally more
attractive to desirable industrial and commercial enterprises than similar
communities-with less adequate facilities.
Schools, parks, utilities, cemeteries, libraries, police, fire, and
water and wastewater facilities, and township halls and other public buildings are examples of community facilities.

Those facilities which are dis-

cussed elsewhere in the plan, such as parks and water and wastewater facilities, have been deleted from this chaptero
Structures
Other than those buildings related to water and sewer functions, the
only structure owned and operated by Ishpeming Township ia the t'ownship hall.
Built in 1969, it is located on US-41 near the general population,
size is adequate for present and future needs.

The lot

The brick and concrete build-

ing is in good condition and is eqnipp~d with toilets, electricity and heat.
Although originally designed as a fire hall, the building now provides
rooms for meetings andoffices for Township business as well as housing for
fire fighting equipment.

The building cannot be truly classified as a com-

munity building since, having originally been designed as a fire hall, it
does not have room for community functions such as wedding receptions, youth
programs, senior citizen programs, or related acti~ities.
ture does not provide ready access to the handicapped.

Also, the struc-

The lack of space

also results in relatively cramped working conditions for the Township employees.

86

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

CHAPTER IX
HOUSING

Introduction
Ishpeming Township ia experiencing a period of rapid grovth.

The

population is expected to increase by well over 1,000 people between 1970
and 1980.

This growth has had an effect and will continue to exert an ef-

fect on the housing situation in Ishpeming Township.

'l'his chapter identi-

fies what types of homes have been built, when they were built, where they
are located, and what housing problems have developed over the years.

It

also includes population and housing trends and an estimate of projected
housing needs for 1980.

An investigation of ·these elements will enable tha

Township to formulate an overall plan that will effectively meet present
and future housing needs.

Existing Hou?in~ Characteristics
Ishpeming Township contains about

5%

4% of the County's year-round rasidenceso

of the County's land area and about
The 1970 census of housing revealed

that there were 803 housing units within Ishpeming Township.
ded 671 year-round occupied units,

The units inclu-

84 vacant units, 48 seasonal housing units

and 2 mobile homes.
A housing survey carried out by the Marquette County Planning Commission

during April of 1977 revealed that there were 1109 housing units in Ishpeming
Township, 1016 of which were year-rotmd occupied residences.

Of the 1016

JS~r-round occupied residences, 796 were single family, 134 were mobile homes,
62 were in duplexes, 23 were in apartment buildings, and 1 was attached.
year-round units were distributed around the Township as follows:

The

54% in sub-

divisions in Section 7 and 8, T47N-R27W; 13% in Sunnyside Estates mobile home
park (this park contains 97% of the Township's mobile homes); 12% in North

7% in North Lake; 7% along County Road CL and Cooper Lake; and 4%
along County Road 573.
Ishpeming;

Five vacant single family residences were located scattered around various parts of the Township.
an estimate of

Due to snowed-in roads at the tim~ of the aurvey,

83 seasonals, located on or neat the Dead River Basin, was .

made from existing maps and aerial photographs.

88

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

some seasonal- dwellings.
Of the 1,016 year-round occupied units located in the survey, 1 1014
were rated as sound and only 2 as substandard.

were rated as substandard and only 3 of the 88 seasonal unite were rated as
subs tandard.
Condition of Housing Units

I

I
I

Sub-Standard

Sound

Year-Round Occupied Units
Vacant Units Located
Seasonal Units Located
Source:

Percent

Number

Number

Percent

1,014

99.876

2

3

6o.o%

2

85

97.&lt;Ylo

3

Marquette County Planning Commission Housing Study, 1977

As can be seen from the above figures, the condition of housing in
Ishpeming Township is very good.

This can be partially attributed to the

r~lative nev age of the housing supply~

It can be estimated that over

50%

of the housing in the Township has been built since 1950.

Age of Housing Units
Percenta

Year Built

15%
18%
1.5%
32%

Prior to 1921
1921 to 1940
1941 to 1950
1951 to 1960
1961 to 1972

I
I
I

Only 2 of the 5 vacant units

a

2,:d,%

Percentages represent summary from 20 percent sampling of selected
townships and cities.

Source:

County Equalization records.

Les e than one percent or two of the Township's year-round occupied
residences were rated as either deteriorating or dilapidated.

90

About 6~

�..
HOUSING

· FIGURE

18.

. HOUSING

IS ~JP E fo/1If.JG

TO~Vli.JSHIP

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

......

i;},·::1

1
N

LEGEND
DENSITY
CQNDJTJON
Sound
Hmm o-7 Housesl40ac.
Deter/~rating

C'J s-19 Houses/40ac.

Delapidatsd

1llllll 20+-Houses/40ac.

Miles

l&amp;:t:~·:il
0

I

ffi·htl
2

3

Source: Marquette
County HousinqStudy, _1977.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

Number ~/Persons Psr Room
Percent

Total

Owner

Percent

Renter

1.0 or lesa

598

89.1

548

88.8

50

1.01 - 1.50

65

9.7

61

9.9

4

8

1.2

8

1.3

1.. 51

and up

Source:

Percent

1970 Census of HoUEing

T'ne F.ate of otrner occupancy in the township is very high$

Of the total

671 year-round occupied units in 1970, 617 or 92°/4 were owner occupied and 54

or

8% were renter occupiedo The value of owner-occupied units and a break-

down of monthly rental fees are supplied below.

These figures are now dated

and should be reviaed with the 1980 census.
Value of OirmeT-0ccn-pied Uni ts 2 1970

Value

Number of Units

Less than $5,000
$5,000 - $9,999

$10,000 -$14,999
$15,000 -$19,999

Number of Units

Value

64
41

$20,000-$21~,999

30
8.5

$25,000-$~,999
$35,000-$49,999
$50,000 or more

126
129

9
2

Monthly Contract of Renter - Occupied Units, 1970

Cash Rent

Number of Units

Cash Rent

Number of Units

Less than $40

10

$120 - $149

2

$40 - $59

8
16
4

$150 - $199

0

$200 - $299
$3()0 and up

0

3

No caeh rent

7

S6o - S79

$80 - S99
S100 - $119

Source:

1970 Census of Housing

94

0

�/I

Construction Trends
No accurate records were kept for the number of net1 housing uni ts built
in the Township prior to 1974.
siilca 1974.

However, accuTate records have b~en kept

In 1974, 40 building permits were issued for new housing, 33 in

1975, 55 in '1976, and 35 in 1977. A breakdown of these permits crui be found
below.

Upon completion thase new structures provided or ~ill provide Ishpem-

ing Township with 40 new housing unit~ in 1974, 40 in 1975? 63 in 1976, and
34 in 1977. This averages out to 44 new units per year.
Buildint; Permits Ia.sued 1/1/?l} - 12/31/7? ·

Single Units

1m.

1222.

122§_

1977

35

30

45

34

0

2

Multiple Units

(9 units)

1 (4 units)

1 (120 units)

nursing home
Mobile Homes

I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I

Source:

5

1

9

0

Ishpeming Township Builaing Code Inap~ctor

According to the IshpGming To~mship Building Inspector, th3 drop in
building permits in 1977 can be attributed to the lack of available area
for new bousingo

However, land is currently in the process of being plat-

ted for lots and the number of permits is expected to increase in 1978.

A

limited amount of building 9 approximately a dozen homes, has occurred on
larger parcels of land.

At the present time mobile homes must be placed

in mobile home parks.
Ishpeming Township is in the process of building a ·nursing home housing

122 beds, which is expected to be completed in 1978. A senior citizens apartment building is also in the initial stages of planning.
Building Code Enforcement. On November 6, 19?4, the State of Michigan
Construction Code, Act 230, 1972, went into effect, providing for statewide
adoption and enforcement of some form of building code.
elected to enforce the Michigan State Building Code.

Ishpeming Township

The Township employs

one part time building inspector who is under the direction of the Township
Supervisor.

Marquette County enforces the National Electrical and the

Michigan Plumbing Code.

96

�Computation of Houaing Needs
Number of Year-Round Unita 1 1977 o•••••••••
Number of Year-Round Units, 1980 est.•••••

1016
117.5
+ 159

Source:

New Units Expected 1977-1980 ••••••••••••••

- 132
+ 27

Re~lacement Needs ••o••••••~•••••~•••••••••

0

Net Needs 1980 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

+ 27

Marquette County Planning Commission Housing Study, 1977.

1~ese estimates and assumptions

apply to the Ishpeming Township

housing supply and establish a 1980 housing need. This need represents
u..~its that will be necessary in addition to the normal activity that can
ba expected.
Issues and Prob1lerns
-

Housing units in the Township are relatively new.

-

The overall condition of the housing is very good.
Mobile homes are only allowed in mobile home parks.
one mobile home park in the Township.

There is currently

The unfilled demand for low cost housing is increasingly being met by
the mobile home, whose numbers have increased considerably since 1970.

I
I
I

I
I
I

-

The low vacancy rate, which is under one half percent, allows prices to
be higher than needed and choice to be very limitedo

-

There is a lack of variety in the existing housing supply. Single unit
structures comprise 78% of the year-round housing supply. Multiple units
comprise only 9% of the housing supply. The remaining 13% is comprised
of mobile homes.
The eXPansion of Empire and Tilden Mines and the growing preference of
mining employees to live in rural areas will probably increase the demand for housing in the Townshipi

�Economy
GOAL

I.

PROMOTE THE GROWTH OF STABLE EMPLOYMENT IN ISHPEMING TOWNSHIP.

Objectives
1.

Encourage the expansion of existing industries while promoting the
location of new small-scale industries in the Township.

2.

Encourage well coordinated efforts by the Township government and
private interests to stimulate greater diversification in the economic sector.

3. Relate econ~mic problems and problem remedies to other Township
problems and targets.

4.

Encourage commercial and industrial development on planned locations.

5.

Develop and consolidate tourism's role in the economy of the Township by upgrading, expanding, and properly maintaining existing tourist facilities; by perser-~ing historic and scenic areas, wilderness
areas, wildlife habitats, and open space areas; and by promoting Ishpeming Township as an area with year-round recreational opportunitias.

6. Restructure and expand the forestry industry through bet-ter forest
land management, harvesting, utilization, and marketing.

7.

Promote agriculture bypreserving lands with agricultural potentials
and by encouraging agricultural management.

Land Use
GOALS

I.

I
I

I
I
I

II.

III.

IV.

v.

PROVIDE A WIDE VARIETY OF LIVING AREAS RANGING FROM LOW DENSITY
RURAL TO HIGH DENSITY URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
DESIGN NEW DEVELOPMENT AREAS CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY RESOURCES.
ENCOURAGE AND PLAN FOR RECREATIONAL OR LOW DENSITY HOUSING IN AREAS
THAT WILL Nar INCREASE SOCIAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS.
PRESERVE AGRICULTURE AS A VIABLE, PERMANENT LAND USE.
PROMOTE AND MAINTAIN AN OPEN SPACE LAND USE SYSTEM.

�Transnortation

GOAL

I.

IMPROVE ALL MODES AND ARTERIES OF TRANSPORTATION IN A BALANCED
RELATIONSHIP TO EACH OTHER AND AS INTEGRAL PARTS OF A LOCAL,

REGIONAL,
II.

.A}m

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM.

COORDINATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WITH THE
OVERALLL DEVELOPMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP'S Hln-1AN AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES.

Objectives
1.

Coordinate the transportation development of the To,..mship with
those of the cities, County, and State ..

2.

Coordinate the transportation related plans of private enterprises
with the plans of public agencies.

3. Participate in County and State transportation planning.

4.

Improve the convenience and safety of the transportation system
to maximize the mobility of the Township•s people ..

5.

Make recommendations for roa&lt;.l improvements and seek Planning Com--

mission review of the County Road Commission's periodic construction programs within the Township ..

6.

Encourage land use controls which will:
(a)

Minimize or discourage developments, including residential,
commercial, and outdoor advertising, which interfere with the
transportation function of arterial and principal collector
roadso

(b)

Facilitate abandonment of roads which serve localities not
suitable for development, permitting resources to be used
where need is greater.

r
102

�Objectives
1.

Existing public water and waste1:1ater systems should be maintained
and periodically rehabilitated and improved.

2.

Existing public water and wastewater systems should be eArpanded to
service new de~elopment immediately adjacent to present service
areas.

3. Storm water should continue to be separated from sanitary waste and/or
treated wherever feasible.

4.

(a)

Not be installed in location with limitations which could
inhibit· adequate wastewater disposal.

(b)

Continue to be maintained on a regular basis.

(c)

Be rehabilitated or replaced to alleviate wastewater disposal
problems that public regulatory agencies have determined to
be dangerous to the public heal~h.

5.

Federal, state, and local governments should fully cooperate
in planning and financing municipal wastewater systems whenever
feasible.

6.

Public water and wastewater systems should be jointly developed
in adjoining cities and townships where such joint use achieves
economies of scale and permits improved quality controL

?o

Wastewater collection s:ystems should be upgraded to minimize
excessive infiltration/inflow of ground water and surface water .when
necessary.
Land use planning should be carried out through-out the Township
to guide the orderly and efficient expansion and renewal of existing population centers; local land use controls, including
zoning and subdivision ordinances, should be enacted, enforced,
andnperiodically updated.

Bo

9.

10.

I

Onsite wastewater disposal systems should:

Public water and wastewater systems should not be developed to
service areas outside the Township's existing population centers,
except:
(a)

To service lake or river front development, and

(b)

To· correct conditions that public regulatory agencies have
determined to be dangerous to the public health.

Local wastewater rates should crontinue to:
(a)

Be set at levels sufficient to support the costs of maintenance and operations, debt service, and the building of a
r·eserve fund;

(b)

Be reviewed annually; and

(c)

Wherever feasible, refect cost apportionments among users according to
the amount of water they consume.

�Housing

GOALS
I.

ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HOUSING SUPPLY WHICH PROVIDES EACH
FAMILY OR INDIVIDUAL WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO RESIDE IN DECENT,
SAFE, AND SANITARY HOUSING.

II.

DEVELOP LOCAL LA.l'\fD USE PLANS WHICH GUIDE HIGH DENSITY POPULATION
AND HOUSING GROWTH INTO AREAS WITH EXISTING OR PLANNED FACILITIES
AND SERVICES.

III.

ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HOUSING SUPPLY WHICH PROVIDES EACH
FAMILY WITH A CHOICE REGARDING HOUSING 'rYPES' DENSITY' Al'm COST.

IV.

ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING IN A MANNER
WHICH STRENGTHENS THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL WELL BEING OF EXISTING
COMMUNITIES •

V.

DEVELOP NEW HOUSING IN AREAS WHICH ALLOW FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF
AND PRESERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES.

Objectives
1.

Recognize housing ac.1 a public, as well as a private, responsibility ..

2.

Encourage the development of a wide variety of housing types, including single family homes, mobile homes, duplexes, town houses, and
apartments.

3.

Encourage mobile home development only in planned mobile home parks.

4. Encourage the development of housing designed to meet the special
needs of particular segments of society, such as the elderly, lowincome, and middle income groups.

5. Seek greater support in the form of financial assistance from the
State Housing Authority, HUD, and Farmer's Home Administration.

6.

Encourage the development of programs designed to rehabilitate old
and obsolete, but structurally sound, dwellings.

7. Encourage Planned Unit Developments and cluster development as a
means of obtaining larger open space acres.&lt;&gt;within residential areas.

8. Promote quality residential site planning which preserves natural
resources and critical areas such as wetlands, lakeshores, steep
slopes, and woodlands.

9. Promote soil conservation practices which minimize soil erosion
during residential construction.
10.

Recognize and encourage quality site planning in order to conserve·
transportation and heating energy.

106

�CHAPTER XI
IMPLEMEN'l'ATION

Implementation
The implementation section of the Ishpeming Township Comprehensive
Plan outlines ways and means of carrying out the recommendations made in
this report, and establishes guidelineG fer administering a planning programo

A

number of legal and administrative methods are available for im-

plementation of the plan.

Every effort should be made by Township offi-

c 5.als and residents to follow a program of this nature.
Legal Implementation
Zoning_Or~inance/Subdivision Re1;Ulation.

An important method of im-

plementing the land use recommendations made within the Plan is through
zoning.

A zoning ordinance regulates the use of private land, population

densities, land coverage, and heights of structureso

The ordinance should

consist of a map showing the various land use districts, and include . a
written document governing standt=J.rds and administrative procedures.

It is

recommended that the Township Planning Comrnissioni which is also the ZoningBoard, take a strong stand on enforcing the zoning ordinance.

The addition

of a Planned Unit Development section in the ordinance and subdivision control regulations should be considered in the future.
Building and Housing Codes.

Building and housing codes establish stan-

dards for building construction and for dwelling units.

Building Codes con-

tain regulations concerning new construction and major repairs or alterations to existing structures.

The State Construction Code provides for ac-

ceptable structure standards and construction practices.
concerned with residential units.
sanitary living conditions.

Housing codes are

They are designed tu insure safe, sound,

The housing code primarily addresses itself to

the questions of overcrowding.
It is recommended that the Ishpeming Township Planning Commission take
a more active role in the process of enforcing and supervising building
codes in Ishpeming Township ..

108

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008743">
                <text>Ishpeming-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan_1978</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008744">
                <text>Marquette County Planning Commission, Marquette County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008745">
                <text>1978-09</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008746">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008747">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan for Ishpeming Township was prepared by the Marquette County Planning Commission in September 1978.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008748">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008749">
                <text>Ishpeming Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008750">
                <text>Marquette County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008751">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008753">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008754">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008755">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008756">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038354">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54824" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59094">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/beed8de720f7a5c372e67660d5acc802.pdf</src>
        <authentication>652d20bd5a6cc49aa1f83b4380dea77a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010254">
                    <text>FINAL DRAFT

(C(O)MOFmJEilffiEN§ITVJE JFJLAN
City of St. Joseph, Michigan

- - - - - - - - - - - GoRAADCblesl'C

@

�COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ST. JOSEPH, MICHIGAN

Prepared for:
CITY OF ST. JOSEPH
St. Joseph, Michigan

FEBRUARY 1993
Project E13991

Prepared by:
GOVE ASSOCIATES INC.
1601 Portage Street
Kalamazoo, Michigan

�City of St. Joseph Planning Commission

Burton Baker
Robert Ehrenberg
Patsy Hartzell
Jerry Heppler
Daniel Hopp
Richard Lambrecht
Rosemarie Reissmann
Jeffrey Schmidt
William Thomas
Wes Harper, Jr.
(Ex-Officio)

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ................................................. i

PART I: INVENTORY, TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS

•

PHYSICAL FEATURES ......................................
Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Climate .............................................
Soils ...............................................
Topography and Natural Features ..........................
Environmental Contamination Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Floodplain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sensitive Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A-1
A-1
A-3
A-5
A-6
A-6
A-7
A-7

POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
Population Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1
Age Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1
Population Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-5
Race Composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-5
Household Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-5
Population Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-7
Trend Analysis Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 O
HOUSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy and Tenure of Housing Units
Types of Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Housing Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Age of Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Household Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.... .. ..... .. ........
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................

C-1
C-1
C-1
C-4
C-6
C-7

ECONOMY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1
Unemployment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1
Employment by Industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-3
Principal Economic Base Employers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-6
Available Industrial Sites in Berrien County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-8
Income ............................................. D-9
Taxes ............................................. D-10

PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES ........................ E-1
City Hall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-3
Police Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-4
Fire Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-5
Recreational Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-5
School District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-8
Mercy Memorial Medical Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-13
Churches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-16
Historic Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-17

�Page
YWCA of South Western Michigan ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
KRASL Art Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Benton Harbor-St. Joseph YMCA Family Center . . . . . . . . . . .
Maud Preston Palenske Memorial Library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water .............................................
Wastewater Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Electricity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Public Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
National Functional Classification System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average Daily Traffic Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

E-17
E-18
E-18
E-19
E-19
E-20
E-21
E-22
E-22
E-22
E-22

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
St. Joseph Questionnaire Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
Tabulated Survey Results ................................ F-1
Comments from Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-5
Cross-Tabulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7
St. Joseph Planning Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-15
St. Joseph Key Person Survey Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-17
EXISTING LAND USE ......................................
Introduction ..........................................
Land Use Classifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Existing Land Use Inventory/Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Existing Land Use Inventory/Analysis: Planning Areas . . . . . . . . . . .
Potential Areas of Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

G-1
G-1
G-1
G-2
G-5
G-9

PART II: FUTURE LAND USE, GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES
GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE ............... H-1
FUTURE LAND USE ........................................
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Future Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Public Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1-1
1-1
1-1
1-1
1-4
1-6
1-7
1-8

CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J-1

APPENDIX A - St. Joseph Planning Questionnaire
St. Joseph Key Person Survey

�LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
8-1 POPULATION ............................................ 8-1
8-2 AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH, BERRIEN COUNTY, MICHIGAN . . 8-2
8-3 AGE DIST~IBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH: 1980-90 .... . .............. 8-4
8-4 POPULATION DENSITY .................................... 8-5
8-5 RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-6
8-6 HOUSEHOLDS: ST. JOSEPH, BERRIEN COUNTY, MICHIGAN . . . . . . . . . 8-6
8-7 COHORT-SURVIVAL PROJECTIONS ........................... 8-8
8-8 POPULATION PROJECTIONS ............................... 8-10
C-1 OCCUPANCY AND TENURE OF HOUSING UNITS ................. C-2
C-2 TYPES OF HOUSING UNITS: 1980-1990 ........................ C-2
C-3 TYPES OF HOUSING UNITS IN ST. JOSEPH,
BERRIEN COUNTY, MICHIGAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-3
C-4 MEDIAN VALUE OF OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS ........... C-5
C-5 VALUE OF OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS ............... . . . C-5
C-6 CONTRACT RENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-5
C-7 AGE OF HOUSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-6
C-8 HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND OCCUPIED HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS ..... C-7
C-9 HOUSING UNIT FORECAST ................................. C-8
C-10 HOUSING TYPE FORECAST: TOTAL UNITS ...................... C-9
C-11 HOUSING TYPE FORECAST: FUTURE NEEDS BASED ON
EXISTING UNITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-10
D-1 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE .................................... D-1
D-2 1990 EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY: ST. JOSEPH, BERRIEN COUNTY
MICHIGAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-4
D-3 EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY IN ST. JOSEPH: 1980, 1990 .......... D-5
D-4 PRINCIPAL ECONOMIC BASE EMPLOYERS IN BERRIEN COUNTY . . . . . D-6
D-5 OTHER EMPLOYERS IN BERRIEN COUNTY ..................... D-7
D-6 AVAILABLE INDUSTRIAL SITES ............................... D-8
D-7 INCOME FIGURES FOR ST. JOSEPH AND BERRIEN COUNTY . . . . . . . . D-9
D-8 COMPARISON OF TAX RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-11
E-1 COMPARISON OF COMMUNITIES ............................. E-2
E-2 RECREATIONAL AREA FACILITIES ............................ E-6
E-3 MARINAS IN THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH AND NEARBY MARINAS . . . . . . E-7
E-4 STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-9
E-5 FIVE YEAR STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-10
E-6 LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . E-11
E-7 ST. JOSEPH PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ..................... E-12
E-8 SELECTED STATISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-15
E-9 CHURCHES IN ST. JOSEPH AREA ...................... . .... E-16
E-10 HISTORIC STIES IN ST. JOSEPH ............................. E-17
E-11 YMCA MEMBERSHIP TRENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-18
G-1 CITY OF ST. JOSEPH EXISTING LAND USE ACREAGES ............. G-2
G-2 EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION FOR CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ...... G-7
1-1 LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ................................... 1-3
1-2 FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS: CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ......... 1-3
1-3 FUTURE LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ............................ 1-5

�LIST OF FIGURES
Page

FIGURE
A-1 AVERAGE MONTHLY TEMPERATURES ......................... A-3
A-2 AVERAGE MONTHLY PRECIPITATION .......................... A-4
A-3 AVERAGE MONTHLY SNOWFALL ............................. A-4
8-1 AGE DISTRIBUTION: ST. JOSEPH, BERRIEN COUNTY, MICHIGAN ..... 8-3
8-2 AGE DISTRIBUTION: ST. JOSEPH 1980-90 ..... ............. ..... 8-4
8-3 AGE/SEX DISTRIBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH: 1990 ................. 8-9
8-4 AGE/SEX DISTRIBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH: 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-9
8-5 POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR ST. JOSEPH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-11
C-1 HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE: ST. JOSEPH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-4
C-2 HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE: BERRIEN COUNTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-4
C-3 VALUE OF OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS: 1990 ............. C-6
D-1 UNEMPLOYMENT TRENDS: 1988-1991 ......................... D-2
E-1 AVERAGE DAILY WATER PRODUCTION ....................... E-20

LIST OF MAPS
MAP
A-1
A-2
E-1
E-2
E-3
G-1
G-2
1-1

LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-2
PHYSICAL FEATURES ..................................... A-8
NATIONAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM .............. E-23
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COUNTS .......................... E-25
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC TRENDS .......................... E-26
EXISTING LAND USE ...................................... G-3
PLANNING AREA BOUNDARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-6
FUTURE LAND USE MAP .................................... 1-2

�INTRODUCTION

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INTRODUCTION

• This Comprehensive Development Plan for the
City of St. Joseph, in Berrien County, Michigan,
is an update of the City's Comprehensive Plan
adopted in 1976.
This Plan incorporates
updated information and ideas, as well as key
features of the 1976 Comprehensive Plan, to
create paths the City may follow to reach
established goals.
The process of updating St. Joseph's
Comprehensive Plan will identify many of the
changes that have occurred since the 1976 Plan
was implemented. This Plan will identify existing
trends, patterns, facilities, land uses and
other information to make projections to meet
St. Joseph's future needs.
In order to develop a plan, as opposed to just
an inventory of existing conditions, goals must
be developed that reflect the desires of the
community and its residents. Once the goals
and objectives have been developed - that detail
St. Joseph's preferred future - they must be
compared with the projections established in
this Plan to form strategies. Strategies are
developed to implement goals to help the City
and its residents meet the established goals and
objectives during the planning period. Care
must be exercised that individual strategies are
compatible within all goals.
The Comprehensive Plan should be designed to
build on the community's existing strengths and
lessen or eliminate the effects of the area's
weaknesses.

@ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

�[pffi\(ruu ~ ~
orM [ElMu (Q)[ffiW u[ffi[ElM [Q)~
{J

ffi\rM [Q)

[pl[ffi(Q)J [E(Gu□ (Q) rM~

PHYSICAL FEATURES

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PHYSICAL FEATURES

The physical features of a community are
facts that generally resist change. Since
physical features , essentially do not
change, plans are designed to
accentuate the area's strengths and
minimize the weaknesses of the area's
physical features/setting.

Michigan to the west, Van Buren County
to the northeast and Cass County to the
east. To the south is La Porte County,
Indiana and St. Joseph County, Indiana.
Berrien County is 90 miles from Chicago
and is located in the Chicago-Detroit
industrial corridor. Distances to major
metropolitan areas are:

Location
The location of St. Joseph is one of the
City's physical features that should be
accentuated in any plan developed by
the City. St. Joseph is the County Seat
of Berrien County and is essentially two
separate peninsulas, and an island,
surrounded by various water features.
The southern peninsula, which makes up
the largest portion of St. Joseph, is
bounded by Lake Michigan to the west,
the St. Joseph River to the north and
east, and St. Joseph Township to the
south.
The northern portion of
St. Joseph is bounded by Lake Michigan
to the west, the St. Joseph River to the
south, the Paw Paw River to the east and
Benton Township to the north. A large
portion of the northern portion of
St. Joseph is currently devoted to
industrial uses. Marina Island is also
within the City's boundaries. This island
is located in the St. Joseph River and is
connected to both the southern portion
of St. Joseph, and Benton Harbor, by
Business Loop US-31. Since water
features provide a large portion of the
City's boundaries the potential for
geographic expansion of the City is
limited. While expansion is limited there
are several areas in the City which can
benefit from redevelopment.

Ann Arbor, Michigan
Battle Creek, Michigan
Chicago, Illinois
Cleveland, Ohio
Detroit, Michigan
Flint, Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Indianapolis, Indiana
Jackson, Michigan
Kalamazoo, Michigan
Lansing, Michigan
Mackinac Bridge
South Bend, Indiana

145
71
90
300
183
170
83
160
112
50
120
302
33

Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles

Development and population in Berrien
County is dense enough that the County
has been designated a Metropolitan
Statistical Area (MSA), known as the
Benton Harbor MSA.
Map A-1 shows the location of Berrien
County in relation to Michigan and
surrounding States.
The map also
shows the relationship of St. Joseph to
other communities in Berrien County.

Berrien County is the most southwestern
county in Michigan's lower peninsula.
The County is bounded by Lake

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

A-1

�---------------------- PHYSICAL FEATURES
MAP A-1

- .LOCATION

CANADA

M!~apolis
Milwaukee

• Philadelphia
ittsburg!Lr

County Seat: St. Joseph

®

~~~

fj(~
Benton Harb
St. Jose
Shoreh

v--i

oloma
ervliet

ER R I EN

I I
Eau Claire
0

i I

ien Springs
IYO

51

New Buff ala
Grand Beach .,
Michiana A.

Buchanan0 =+__. · s
ien 0 -. -.i....:c:J==~

:iK;:;;jj"~~ -.@

SOURCE:

0

Michigan Department of Commerce

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

A-2

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PHYSICAL FEATURES
being the month with the highest average
amount of precipitation (3.8"). Generally,
February is the driest month with a total
average of 2. 1 inches of precipitation
(Figure A-2). The average amount of
snow that falls per month can be seen in
Figure A-3. January, with 20.7 inches, is
generally the month with the greatest
snowfall. The average seasonal snowfall
is 67 inches. The prevailing wind is from
the south-southwest.
Average wind
speed is highest, 12.4 miles per hour, in
March from the north-northwest. Every
one year in 10, the last freeze occurs
later than May 15 and the first freeze
occurs earlier than October 5 (USDA).

Climate

Climate, like location, is a physical
feature that is • impossible for a
community to change. The weather
patterns of an area must be considered
in any long-range planning activities.
Figure A-1 shows the average monthly
temperatures for the area (based on data
collected between 1948 and 1977). The
coldest month of the year is generally
January with an average temperature of
25.3 ° F. The warmest month of the year
is generally July with an average temperature of 71.7°F. The average annual
precipitation is 36 inches with April

FIGURE A-1
AVERAGE MONTHLY TEMPERATURES

TEMPERATURE

(FO)

90...------------------,

~

~

~

~

~ ~ g_.G g_&lt;J:'
~-:) ~-:) ~ 't'
't'
~'t' ,t,'?,

~
~,-

~

-.)~
'S

~

-.)"
'S

....

MONlH

~

~

~

~

~

,;;,'&gt; 'l&gt;&lt;,) g;,0 'l&gt;&lt;,) 'l&gt;&lt;,)
"'G
, _~ ~CJ .,~ ~~
,., f'~ c:f&gt; 0-.\~ ~G

"If'

c,v

,..:

(&gt;

- - - AVERAGE HIGH
·

-AVERAGE
• • • · • AVERAGE LOW

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Agriculture

@ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

A-3

�----------------------------- PHYSICAL FEATURES
FIGURE A-2
AVERAGE MONTHLY PRECIPITATION
PRECIPITATION
(INCHES)

4.0,,,-------------------,
....

·:::: 3.o+.......,r-----1:::: ::::.
-

-

-

..-..---1•::::t-.-.. -..r_--1 ::::.

·:::. ►.-

.·:::. ::::. ·:.·:. ·.·:.·. 7:-:-:" ·.·.·.·.· ·::.·: ::.·: .·:.·:

-:-:-:-:-: - -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-::-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-::-:-:-:-:-:-:
2.()- -:-:-:-:-= :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:--:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-

-::::. ::::. ·:::. ·:::: ·:::: ·:::: .-:.-: ::::. ::::. ·:::. ·:::. ·:::.
1.1&gt;- -:-:-:-:- : :-:-:- :-:-:-:- :-:-:-:-. :-:-:-:-: -:-:-:- : -:-:-:-: -:-:-:-: -:-:-:-:- :-:-: :- : :-:-:- :-: :-:-

0

................................. .. .. ..

t.AONlH

FIGURE A-3
AVERAGE MONTHLY SNOWFALL
SNOWFALL

25;------------------,

(INCHES)

20
~

15•

10

-:·::::
-:-:-: 1----------------.... t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1

.. . .

·:::: :::: ~.
............

,...._ ::::
5 - -:-:-:-:- -:-:-:-:-

:-:-:-:- 1------ - - - - -

t.AONlH

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Agriculture

@ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

A-4

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PHYSICAL FEATURES

brown, mottled clay to a depth of
about 60 inches.
Unlike the weather and the location of a
•
community there are methods to
accommodate the soils in a given area
by planning around any serious
limitations of the soils. Berrien County
consists of eight major soil associations.
Of these eight associations two are
dominant in St. Joseph: Blount-Rimer
Association and Shoals-CohoctahAbscota Association.
The following
descriptions are from the Soil Survey of
Berrien County, Michigan:
Blount-Rimer Association - This
association makes up 18 percent of
the county. It is about 40 percent
Blount soils, 20 percent Rimer soils,
and 40 percent soils of minor extent.
Blount soils are nearly level or gently
sloping and somewhat poorly
drained. The surface layer typically
is dark grayish brown loam about 9
inches thick. the mottled subsoil is
about 25 inches thick. The upper
part is yellowish brown, firm silty
clay loam; the lower part is dark
yellowish brown, firm clay. The
underlying material is yellowish
brown, mottled clay loam to a depth
of about 60 inches.
Rimer soils are nearly level or gently
sloping and somewhat poorly
drained. The surface layer typically
is very dark grayish brown loamy
fine sand about 9 inches thick. The
mottled subsurface layer, about 23
inches thick, is pale brown and
yellowish brown, loamy fine sand or
fine sand. The subsoil, about 9
inches thick, is gray, firm clay. The
underlying material is yellowish

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Most of the soils in this association
have been cleared and drained.
They are used for cultivated crops
that are common in the county and
for hay and pasture. Orchards and
vineyards are common. There are
some swampy, undrained areas.
Wetness and restricted permeability
are the main limitations.
If
adequately drained, the soils in this
association are well suited to
cultivated farm crops. They are also
well suited to hay, pasture and
woodlands. These soils are poorly
suited to building site development
and septic tank absorption fields. A
high water table is the main
limitation.
Shoals-Cohoctah-Abs cot a
Association - This association
makes up two percent of the
county.
It is about 30 percent
Shoals soils, 30 percent Cohoctah
soils, 25 percent Abscota soils and
15 percent soils of minor extent.
Areas of these soils are on bottom
lands, floodplains, or terraces along
rivers and streams. The Cohoctah
soils are on lower elevations than
the Shoals and Abscota soils. The
Abscota soils are on higher
elevations than the Shoals and
Cohoctah soils. All of these soils
are subject to flooding.
Shoals soils are nearly level and
somewhat poorly drained.
The
surface layer is dark grayish brown
silt loam about 9 inches thick. The
underlying material is multicolored,
stratified silt loam, loamy fine sand,
A-5

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PHYSICAL FEATURES

fine sandy loam, and loamy fine
sand to a depth of about 60 inches.
Cohoctah soils are nearly level and
poorly drained. The surface soil is
very dark grayish brown and very
dark gray sandy loam about 15
inches thick.
The mottled
underlying material is mostly dark
gray silt loam in the upper part and
very dark gray fine sandy loam in
the lower part to a depth of about
60 inches.
Abscota soils are nearly level to
gently sloping and moderately well
drained. The surface layer is dark
brown sandy loam about 1O inches
thick. The mottled, loose sand
subsoil is about 29 inches thick.
The upper part is light gray, and the
lower part is pale brown.
The
underlying material is multicolored
sand to a depth of about 60 inches.
The Shoals and Abscota soils are
well suited to hay, pasture and
trees. The Shoals soils are well
suited to cultivated crops.
The
Abscota soils are fairly suited to
cultivated crops and some
recreation uses. Shoals soils are
fairly suited to poorly suited to
recreation uses. Cohoctah soils are
poorly suited to cultivated crops,
hay, pasture and recreation uses
and are well suited to woodland.
The soils in this association are
poorly suited to building site
developments and septic tank
absorption fields because of
flooding.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Topography and Natural Features

Like soils, the topography and natural
features of an area should be
accommodated, even though certain
topographical or natural features can be
changed.
One natural feature that
cannot be easily changed is Lake
Michigan, which creates St. Joseph's
western border. This is by far the most
important natural feature in not only St.
Joseph but in the four State region. The
lake's influence on the region and
St. Joseph is very great. The other
major water features that directly
influence St. Joseph are the St. Joseph
River, the Morrison Channel, the Paw
Paw River and south of St. Joseph,
Hickory Creek.
Lake Michigan, whose approximate mean
lake elevation is 580 feet, is the lowest
elevation in St. Joseph. The St. Joseph
and Paw Paw Rivers are essentially the
same elevation. The City's southern
portion is situated on a plateau which
protects the City from fluctuating lake
and river levels. The plateau's elevation
is roughly 650 feet. This plateau, which
forms the more developed part of St.
Joseph, is divided by a valley which acts
as a drain for much of the area's surface
water.
The valley's elevation drops
below 600 feet.
Environmental Contamination Sites

Michigan has listed all of the sites of
environmental contamination that pose
some threat to the State's environment.
Berrien County had 68 sites listed in the
1991 list published by the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources. One
of the State's top priority sites is located
in St. Joseph, north of the St. Joseph

A-6

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PHYSICAL FEATURES

River.
The site is listed as Auto
Specialties and has detectable levels of
lead, arsenic, chromium, PCBs and
benzene. A remedial action plan has not
been approved by the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources but
interim response activity has been
provided.
The only other site in
St. Joseph currently listed by the
Department of Natural Resources is the
Enterprise Oil Tank Farm. The site is
located on Marina Island and has
detectable levels of Benzene and
Toluene. The approximate location of
these sites can be seen on Map A-2.

Sensitive Areas

Sensitive areas in St. Joseph consist of
beaches and wetlands (Map A-2) . Along
much of Lake Michigan's shoreline are
vast stretches of sandy beaches. These
beaches require special attention to
minimize erosion from wind and wave
action. Wetlands are also present in
St. Joseph and are shown on Map A-2.
The majority of wetlands in St. Joseph
are adjacent to the St. Joseph River, but
others exist in both the northern and
southern portions of the City.

Floodplain

The 100-year floodplain, as defined by
the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, is shown on Map A-2. The
floodplain designates areas which are
susceptible to flooding - the 100-year
designation means that during any
particular year there is a 1 in 100 chance
of the area flooding. The largest areas
that are in the floodplain are along the
St. Joseph and Paw Paw Rivers, which
are more susceptible to short-term
fluctuations than the lake. The majority
of Marina Island is in the floodplain as is
the area between 1-94 Business and the
Paw Paw River. A narrow band of land
along Lake Michigan's shoreline is also in
the 100-year floodplain. St. Joseph has
a valley which crosses the City from the
southwest to the northeast. This valley
contains many flood-prone areas that are
not directly related to either the lake or
the rivers.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

A-7

�1......-//.1/' ,,/&lt;._ ,, (

\

~

~

LEGEND

I

I

100- YEAR FLOOD PLAIN

~

WETI..AND

l :;;;:;;;:;i;i;:;;;;;;;;;;1

BEACH

~
·
~

&lt;'

c§

a-

-..

SITE OF ENVIRONMENTAL

CONTAMINATION

~1/)&gt;dl/_~Q~
-

~

/111

.

.

~~

»~a&amp;
v~~vA

f::t~t:t

~

B/flie/
~k]~~

✓

__;ooE:..~
DD

I

CHER

·~

□~

II
~

AVE

:mLJ
1 1r - ~~1AVE
11-;J~lQuVE_,...__..,i
~ON!;;) AVE I ~jh,,0HA\\l(J~
,\\

I,

8

~
j

=~l.E'MS
~ARION

&amp;OIJAYrl&lt;

AI
LNl

I
~~
!ill.I.CREST

~~L 2

~~

1m_JE:J"Elowo7
~,VAN~,~ kf

-·- .□~GQD~

ICQlUMBIA

JI

A',,t

I~

L.,, ...~t,,;;;.;;J~

~,~□□Hl]~L

=~. 'f\-•1
□~
(l

'\ .,_" '"vn~c

' -••

•

-

•

·-·-·J

I ~a"'- •

-JUI

L'1t&gt;I

::JA

■ :::::::!._~

c:::&gt;

~

•L . .i•~,-------.....,--~M~
A
P
~
A~
2
---~1
SAINT JOSEPH ,
I

•

SCALE

P'a•.•500·

o·

1ooo· 1500·

I

MICHIGAN

2500·

GOVE ASSOCIATES INC.
~I

I

I

PHYSICAL
FEATURES MAP

1

�•
•
•
•
•
•II
•
•
••
•
•II
,

II

•
•
•
•

POPULATION

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION

percent. By 1980 the percentage had
dropped to 5.6 percent due to the fact
that the County's population had
continued to increase as the City's
population decreased. Between 1970
and 1980 the population of St. Joseph
decreased from 11 ,042 to 9,622, or 12.9
percent.
Between 1980 and 1990,
St. Joseph's population decreased by 4.2
percent - a much smaller decrease than
during the 1970-80 period.
Berrien
County began to decrease in population
between 1980 and 1990. In 1990 the
County's population of 161 ,378 was 5.8
percent lower than in 1980. Since the
County's population decreased at a
greater rate than St. Joseph's population,
the City increased its share of the
County's population to 5. 7 percent.

The study of the population of a
community is much more than analyzing
the number of people ,residing within a
given area. To thoroughly understand a
community's population, trends must be
established that tie the past to the
present and identify the diversity and
composition of the community's
residents. By relating the past to the
present, it is possible to project various
aspects of St. Joseph into the future.
Population Trends

Between 1960 and 1990, the population
in St. Joseph has decreased by
21.6 percent. During the same period,
Berrien County's population increased by
7.7 percent. Table B-1 identifies the
population of the City and the County
from 1960 through 1990 and shows the
relationship between the two areas. In
1960, St. Joseph's population of 11,755
was 7.8 percent of the County's
population of 149,865.
In 1970,
St. Joseph decreased as a percentage of
the County's total population to 6. 7

Age Distribution

The distribution of the City's residents in
relation to their ages is important to
determine if existing services and facilities

TABLE B-1
POPULATION TRENDS
·::\{::~ .

St. Joseph
Berrien County
St. Joseph as
% of Berrien
County

··-,:_ %r lit / . . ,. ?(

·•·.··

%:

.

t %:

·•· change
'60~'70

, 1980 ·

.Change
'70-'80

-1990·.

11,042

- 6.1

9,622

-12.9

9,214

- 4.2

-21 .6

149,865

163,940

+9.4

171,276

+4.5

161 ,378

- 5.8

+7.7

7.8

6.7

1960

1970

11 ,755

5.6

(;hange Change
_ieo;;.~90 . ·. '60;;.'.90 ,

5.7

SOURCE: U.S. Census of Population: 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990

@ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-1

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION

are available to meet the demands of all
age groups. Table B-2 identifies the age
distributions in St. Joseph as well as
Berrien County and Michigan. Since St.
Joseph's median age of 37.2 is higher
than Berrien County's figure of 33.6 or
Michigan's median age of 32.6, it is
apparent that St. Joseph has a higher
percentage of older residents, or a lower
percentage of younger residents, than
either the County or the State. In 1990
residents under the age of 18 accounted
for 17.8 percent of St. Joseph's
residents. This figure is considerably
lower than the County's 27 percent figure
or the State's figure of 26.5 percent. The
percentage of residents in the 18-24 age

category is not noticeably different in St.
Joseph than in the County or State and
the percentage of residents in the 25-44
age category is only slightly higher in the
City. The percentage of residents in the
45-54 age category is lower in the City
and the percentage of residents in the
55-64 age category is not noticeably
different than either the County or the
State. St. Joseph has a much higher
percentage (18.4%) of residents in the
65-84 age group than the County
(12.4%) or the State (10.8%).
The
percentage of residents 85 and over is
nearly three times as high in St. Joseph
than in the two comparison areas.
Figure B-1 graphically shows the age
distribution for the three areas.

TABLE B-2
AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH CITY,
BERRIEN COUNTY AND MICHIGAN: 1990

&gt;t : a§trierf:~ounty:f; . : tMi.¢higijp ;:
xNOrli:BIP:i'.:. : :~rbt.T6t~f: r %:af¥8tkt•· ·
Under 5

506

5.5

11,895

7.4

7.6

5-17

1,138

12.3

31,624

19.6

18.9

18-24

922

10.0

15,562

9.7

10.8

25-44

3,040

33.0

48,272

29.9

32.1

45-54

805

8.7

16,843

10.4

10.2

55-64

818

8.9

14,947

9.3

8.5

65-84

1,693

18.4

20,026

12.4

10.8

85+

292

3.2

2,119

1.3

1.1

Median Age

37.2

33.6

32.6

SOURCE: U.S. Census of Population: 1990

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-2

�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POPULATION
FIGURE 8-1
AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH, BERRIEN COUNTY AND MICHIGAN: 1990

•

35

30

- - - - - -:: , - - - - - - - - - t

25

:i ~
20

15

10

5

I--

,-

,-

- \I

,-

~ :i:

iv

~

0

UNDER 5 5-17

18-24

25-44

45-54

ACE

55-64

65-84

85+

E/:3

ST JOSEPH

[ZZ3

BERRIEN COUNlY

c::J Mla-tlGAN

SOURCE: 1990 Census of Population

•
•

Between 1980 and 1990 the age
distribution in St. Joseph had several
noticeable changes (Table B-3). The
percentage of children under the age of
five increased from 4.5 percent to 5.5
percent of the population, but the
percentage of children between the ages
5 and 17 decreased from 15.0 percent to
12.3 percent. The number of college age
residents (18-24) decreased by 27.6
percent to lower the percentage of
residents in this age group to 10.0
percent. Between 1980 and 1990 the
percentage of residents in the 25-44 age
group increased 24. 7 percent to account
for 33.0 percent of the population. This
was one of only three age groups that
increased numerically. The 45-54 age
group did not change a great deal
between 1980 and 1990 as a percentage

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

of the City's population but this age
group decreased numerically by 14.7
percent. The number of residents in the
55-64 age group decreased by 33.5
percent, or from 12.8 percent to 8.9
percent of the City's population. It is
unusual that both the 45-54 and the
55-64 age group decreased while the
median age of St. Joseph increased, it is
even more unusual that the 65-84 age
group decreased. The 65-84 age group
decreased numerically but increased as
a percentage of the population - this is
possible since the overall population
decreased at a greater rate than the age
group. The percentage of residents 85
and over increased by 57.8 percent - the
largest percentage increase of the eight
age groups.
Figure 8-2 graphically
represents the changes .
B-3

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION
TABLE 8-3
AGE DISTRIBUTION IN ST. JOSEPH: 1980-1990

435

4.5

506

5.5

+16.3

1,441

15.0

1,138

12.3

-21.0

18-24

1,274

13.3

922

10.0

-27.6

25-44

2,379

24.7

3,040

33.0

+27.8

45-54

944

9.8

805

8.7

-14.7

55-64

1,231

12.8

818

8.9

-33.5

65-84

1,733

18.0

1,693

18.4

-2.3

85+

185

1.9

292

3.2

+57.8

Median Age

36.2

Under 5
5-17

I

37.2

SOURCE: U.S. Census of Population: 1980, 1990
FIGURE B-2
AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH: 1980-1990

NUMBER

UNDER 5 5-17

18-2+

25-+♦

+5-5+

AGE

55-8+

65-84

65+

r::::i:J 1980
IZZ2l 1990

SOURCE: U.S. Census of Population: 1980, 1990

@ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-4

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION

Population Density

The population density of an area is
dependent upon two factors - land area
and population. St. Joseph, with a 1990
population of 9,214 and a land area of
3.4 square miles has a population density
of 2,710 persons per square mile (Table
B-4). Berrien County, which had a 1990
population of 161,378 and a land area of
576 square miles, had a population
density of 280 persons per square mile roughly one-tenth the population density
of St. Joseph. Michigan's population
density in 1990 was 163 persons per
square mile.

percent of the City's population, 15.4
percent of the County's population and
13.9 percent of Michigan's population.
The percentage of people in the
"American Indian, Eskimo or Aleut"
category is also smaller in St. Joseph, as
is the "Other" category. The percentage
of St. Joseph residents in the "Asian or
Pacific Islander" category is 1.5 percent higher than either the County or the
State.
St. Joseph has a lower
percentage of residents with Hispanic
origins than either the County or the
State.
Household Types

Race Composition

The racial composition in St. Joseph is
less varied than in Berrien County or the
State as a whole. Table B-5 shows that
in 1990, 94.9 percent of the City's
residents were white - compared to 82.6
percent for the County and 83.5 percent
for the State. Blacks make up 3.1

How individuals live, in relation to each
other, often reflects the lifestyles and
housing needs of a community. Table
B-6 shows that of the 4,200 households
in St. Joseph, 1,875 or 44.6, are married
couple families. This percentage is much
lower than either Berrien County or
Michigan. Additionally, "Other Family,
Male Householder" families account for a

TABLE B-4
POPULATION DENSITY
... ··T./
·-:-·-: .
., ::,••::;:;-:::::···

" ·::•)
:,:

St. Joseph
Berrien County
Michigan

·-:

·•.

·.·.·.•-

·Square Miles

Population

Population Density
(Persons Per Sq. Mi.)

9,214

2,710

576

161,378

280

56,954

9,295,297

163

3.4

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-5

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION
TABLE 8-5
RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN

@tNumberf
Black
American Indiana, Eskimo, or Aleut
Asian or Pacific Islander
Other
Hispanic Origin (any race)

94.9

133,259

82.6

83.5

283

3.1

24,872

15.4

13.9

20

0.2

685

0.4

0.6

142

1.5

1,487

0.9

1.1

26

0.3

1,075

0.7

0.9

113

1.2

2,683

1.7

2.2

SOURCE: U.S. Census of Population: 1990

smaller percentage (2.1%) of households
than the County (2.9%) or the State
(3.3%). In St. Joseph there are 338
households in the "Other Family, Female
Householder" category, or 8.0 percent of
all households - lower than the County's
figure of 13.3 percent or the State's
figure of 12.9 percent.
Since the
percentage of family households was
lower in St. Joseph it follows that the
percentage of nonfamily households is
much higher. In 1990, 1,900 of the City's

4,200 households were nonfamily
households, or 45.2 percent. This is a
much higher rate than either the
County's rate of 28.1 percent or the
State's rate of 28.7 percent. Single
person households accounted for 40.0
percent of the City's households
compared to 24.4 percent of the
County's and 23. 7 of the State's
households. This large percentage of
single-person households is why the
City's median number of persons per

TABLE 8-6
HOUSEHOLDS: ST. JOSEPH, BERRIEN COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Total Households

4,200

100.0

61,025

100.0

100.0

Married Couple Families

1,875

44.6

33,974

55.7

55.1

87

2.1

1,772

2.9

3.3

338

8.0

8,099

13.3

12.9

1,900

45.2

17,180

28.1

28.7

Householder Living Alone

1,680

40.0

14,861

24.4

23.7

Householder 65 and Over

699

16.6

6,406

10.5

9.3

Other Family, Male Householder
Other Family, Female Householder
Nonfamily Households

Persons Per Household

2.06

2.60

2.66

SOURCE: U.S. Census of Population: 1990

@ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-6

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION

household is lower than either the
County or the State. One explanation of
the larger percentage of single person
households is the lar9er percentage of
single householders over 65 years of
age, which accounts for 16.6 percent of
the City's households. Many of these
households are occupied by individuals
whose spouses are deceased. While this
accounts for many of the 1,680 single
person households it does not account
for all of them. In 1990 there were 981
single person households occupied by
residents under 65 - this accounts for
23.4 percent of the City's households
and is much higher than the County's
rate of 13.9 percent.
Population Projections

In order to meet the residents of a
community's future needs, it is essential
that population projections are established that reflect the population over a
set period of time. These projections can
be one of two major types of projections.
The first is based on past trends and the
existing population, and shows where the
population is likely to go if no steps are
taken to change the rate of growth or
decline. The second major type of projection is goal oriented and involves
establishing what the desired population
should be-based on a variety of factors
such as population density, services
available, land available and many other
considerations.
Ideally, population
projections should be based on a combination of these two styles since trends
cannot be ignored and the act of planning is essentially a community's desire
to have some control over its future.
Cohort-Survival Method of Projection

existing population into age groups and
projecting each of these age groups into
the future. St. Joseph's population has
been separated by sex into 18 separate
age groups for a total of 36 groups (18
male and 18 female). The size of the 36
groups is based on 1990 Census
information. Once the age groups were
established each group was moved into
the future five years at a time. A survival
rate, different for each age and sex
group, was applied to each of the 36
groups. The survival rates are based on
1988 national averages which suit this
sample well since residents of Michigan
and the United States have similar
average lifespans (Michigan 73.65,
United States 73.88). When the survival
rates are applied to each of the age
groups, the size of the group decreases
as it moves into the future, decreasing
more rapidly as the age group matures
and ages. Since each age group moves
forward, a void is created when the
under 5 year old age group moves into
the 5-9 year old age group. These voids
have been filled by calculating the 1990
ratio of women of child bearing age (1544) to the under 5 age group. In 1990
there was one child in the under 5
category for every 4.004 woman of child
bearing age. This ratio has been applied
in each of the future time-increments to
project the number of children under 5
years of age, and is divided evenly
between male and female children.
The entire process of projecting each
group and determining the number of
under 5 years old has been calculated
for 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015.
The individual results, along with the
1990 information, can be seen in
Table B-7. This table does not reflect inmigration or out-migration.

The Cohort-Survival method of population
projections lnvolves separating the

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-7

�TABLE B-7

0

COHORT-SURVIVAL PROJECTIONS

('}

~

&gt;-&lt;:

.:,:/\, 2000.,.,

~

: {~ie :, ;t;fu;i~ • ., Toti(i ·· tk1J:/

en

~

....,
0

~

~II
en

: :;;ffi~,~

:Mti,i::r ::fJMii~f ;:J6~1:U

:Mail} feffi;1e •·

ti~~

468

217

218

435

205

206

411

180

181

361

167

167

334

I

504 I

233 I

234 I

467 I

216 I

218 I

434 I

201 I

203 I

404 I

178 I

178 I

356

235 I

210 I

445 I

231 I

213

I

233 I

234 I

467 I

216 I

218 I

434 I

201 I

203 I

404

241 I

168 I

409

I

235 I

210 I

445 I

231 I

213 I

504

I

233 I

234 I

467 I

216 I

218 I

434

I

246 I

520 I

239 I

168 I

407 I

233 I

209 I

442 I

229 I

212 I

501 I

231 I

233 I

464

212

I

245 I

517 I

237 I

168 I

405 I

231 I

208 I

439 I

221 I

211 I

498

348 I

328 I

676 I

210 I

244 I

514 I

235 I

167 I

402 I

229 I

207 I

436

Under 5

232

274

506

234

234

5-9

235

210

445

231 I

213

10-14 I

241 I

168 I

409 I
523 I

I

504

~II
~II

15-19 I

276 I

247 I

20-24 I

353 I

330

811

25-29 I

477 I

431 I

908 I

351 I

329 I

680 I

30-34 I

455 I

363

I

818 I

473 I

430 I

903

35-39

373

344

717

451

362

813

469

429

898

345

327

672

268

243

511

233

166

399

40-44

286

311

597

368

342

710

445

360

805

463

426

889

341

325

666

265

242

507

45-49

206

221

427

282

309

591

363

340

703

440

358

798

457

423

880

337

323

660

50-54

167

211

378

200

218

418

274

304

578

353

335

688

428

352

780

444

416

860

55-59

171

207

378

162

208

370

194

215

409

266

299

565

343

330

683

416

347

763

60-64

204

236

440

158

198

356

150

199

349

179

206

385

246

286

532

317

316

633

65-69

203

289

492

189

226

415

146

190

336

139

191

330

165

197

362

227

273

500

70-74

147

298

445

170

261

431

158

204

362

122

172

294

116

173

289

138

178

316

75-79

147

266

413

123

270

393

142

236

378

132

184

316

102

156

258

97

156

253

80-84

96

247

343

96

204

300

80

207

287

92

181

273

86

141

227

66

120

186

85+

71

221

292

87

270

357

93

278

371

84

284

368

89

356

81

Total

4,340

4,874

9,214

4,325

4,758

9,083

4,289

4,638

8,927

4,240

4,515

8,755

4,166

8,542

4,076

('}

~II

II

Median Age

I

= 37.2

683

I

214

Median Age

= 38.8

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census of Population; Gove Associates Inc.

to
I

00

I

I

Median Age

= 40.7

Median Age

= 43.0

I

267

I

4,376

Median Age = 45.5

I

229

4,242

I

315

I 8,318

Median Age"' 47.5

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION
FIGURE B-3
AGE/SEX DISTRIBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH: 1990
MAU

FDIAI.£

AOE

•

P-

I
I

I
I
70-7♦

I

I

80-84

l

55-158

I

I

I

I

I

I
I

I

25-29

I

I

20-2♦

I

I

15--1 8

I

10-14

5--8

I

UNDO&lt; 5

500

400

JOO

200

100

100

200

300

400

500

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census of Population; Gove Associates Inc.
FIGURE 8-4
AGE/SEX DISTRIBUTION FOR ST. JOSEPH: 2015
MAI.£

FDIAI.£

AOE

lt H
80-M
75-79

r

70-74

r

I

65-69

I

80-84

I

I
I
I

I
I

I

35-39

I

Jo-34

25-29
2.0-24

15-18
10-14

5-9

I
500

-4-00

300

200

100

100

200

300

400

500

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

@ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-9

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION
Trend Analysis Projections

In addition to the Cohort-Survival Method
of projecting the population, projections
based on past trends in St. Joseph have
been calculated. Four separate trends
are shown in Table B-8 (in addition to the
Cohort-Survival Method). Three linear
trends are shown that are based on the
changes in population between 19801990, 1970-1990 and 1960-1990. The
10-year trend projection has the least
drastic population decreases - due to a
slower decrease between 1980 and 1990
than the other two periods. The 10-year
trend analysis is also very similar to the
Cohort-Survival figures. Between 1990

and 2015, the 10-year trend analysis
shows an 11.07 percent decrease in
population - from 9,214 residents in 1990
to 8, 194 residents in 2015. The CohortSurvival has a slightly smaller decrease from 9,214 in 1990 to 8,318 in 2015, or a
9.72 percent decrease. The projection
based on the 20-year (1970-1990) data
has the greatest decrease in population.
This projection shows a decrease from
the 1990 population of 9,214 to a 2015
figure of 6,929 - a 24.8 percent decrease.
The 30-year (1960-1990) trend projection
is nearly as dramatic as the 20-year trend
analysis.
The 2015 figure for this
projection is 7,096 - a 23.0 percent
decrease.

TABLE 8-8
POPULATION PROJECTIONS

10-Year ('80-'90)

9,214

9,010

8,806

8,602

8,398

8,194

-11 .07

20-Year ('70-'90)

9,214

8,757

8,300

7,843

7,386

6,929

-24.80

30-Year ('60-'90)

9,214

8,790

8,367

7,943

7,520

7,096

-23.00

Cohort Survival (in-migration
= out-migration)

9,214

9,083

8,927

8,755

8,542

8,318

-9.72

Equilibrium (based on a
9,214
9,151
9,088
9,067
9,047
9,040
decreasing percentage
decrease)
SUURvt:: 1960-1970-1980-1990 U.S. Census of Population; Gove Associates nc.

-1.89

@ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-10

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ POPULATION

approaching 0.0 percent in the future this projection has been tabled
"Equilibrium." It is felt that to set an
optimistic tone for this Plan this is the
projection that should be followed.

The final trend analysis is by far the most
optimistic of all the projections.
This
projection is based on the fact that
between 1970 and 1980 the City's
population decreased by 12.9 percent,
and that between 1980 and 1990 the
decrease in population decreased by 4.2
percent. If this trend is carried forward
the population would decrease by 1.4
percent between 1990 and 2000 and
by 0.4 percent between 2000 and 2010.
Since the population continues to
decrease, but at a much lower rate -

These two analyses illustrate the point
that without some intervention the City's
population will continue to decline in
number and increase in age. The "goal"
for the City should be a long-range
increase in population, reversing the
trend of the past 30 years.

FIGURE 8-5
POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR ST. JOSEPH

POPUI.AllON
12,000

11,000

~

10,000

11 ,042

~ ........,

~ 9 214

..

..

..

9!"'

••..;

8,

-~·.::: •=..:.:• ..:.·• ~t:...

9,000

h--.,

8,000

8

81 4

~"&gt;
~:---.

7, 000

6

s;, ~9

6,000

s.ooo
4,000

J ,000
2,000

1,000
0

19 0

19~0

1980

1990

19tl5

20 00

2005

2(1 0

211 5

• ••• ••
--• · ••• •
_,, _ ,,_

COHORT-S\JRll1VAI.
10 YEAR TREND
20 \'EAR TREND
30 'l'EAR TREND
EQUILIBRIUM

YEAR

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B-11

�HOUSING

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING

The housing in a community is often a
direct reflection of the character and
economic well-being o# the community.
Besides obvious details such as
abandoned houses, vacant lots or
deteriorated housing units, there are
more subtle indicators of a community's
housing characteristics that can be used
to create a profile of the area's housing
stock.
Occupancy and Tenure
of Housing Units

Even with St. Joseph's decreasing
population, the City has a higher
percentage of occupied housing units
than either the County or the State. Of
the City's 4,545 housing units, 4,200
(92.4%) were considered to be occupied
in 1990. This percentage is higher than
the County's figure of 87.8 percent or the
State's figure of 88.9 percent. These
figures can be seen in Table C-1. One of
the main reasons the State and County
have a higher percentage of vacant units
than St. Joseph is that Michigan and
Berrien County have a higher percentage
of vacant seasonal units than St. Joseph.
Only 1.3 percent of St. Joseph's housing
units are seasonal units, compared to 6.4
percent of the County's housing and 5.8
percent of the State's. St. Joseph has a
much lower percentage of owneroccupied housing units than either
Berrien County or Michigan. Of the
City's 4,200 occupied housing units in
St. Joseph, 2,396 (57.0%) were owneroccupied in 1990. The remaining 1,804
(43.0%) occupied units were renteroccupied.
Berrien County's owneroccupied units account for 69.6 percent
of the occupied units and Michigan's
owner-occupied units account for 71.0
percent of the State's occupied housing

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

units. Finally, Table C-1 shows that
St. Joseph has a much lower percentage
of units with over one person per room.
The main reason for this is probably the
large percentage of single person
households.
Types of Housing

Housing types change to suit the needs
of a community. Between 1980 and
1990 the total number of housing units
decreased by 0.3 percent - a much
smaller percentage decrease than the 4.2
percent decrease the population
experienced. This does not mean that a
vast number of vacant housing units
have been created by the differences.
Many of the housing units in St. Joseph
are occupied by single person
households, so while there are fewer
people to fill the housing units,
household sizes have been decreasing
as well, and occupancy rates stabilizing.
Table C-2 shows how the number of
single-family homes decreased by 1. 7
percent between 1980 and 1990. This
means that 44 homes have been torn
down, converted to multiple-family units
or converted to other uses such as office
or commercial uses. During the same
period the number of duplex units
has decreased by two and the number
of multiple-family units has decreased
by 12.

C-1

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING
TABLE C-1
OCCUPANCY AND TENURE OF HOUSING UNITS

? f@1.1sirtg
:nJ;itts:

69,532

100.0

100.0

61 ,025

87.8

100.0

88.9

100.0

57.0
43.0

42,452
18,573

61.1
26.7

69.6
30.4

63.1
25.8

71.0
29.0

7.6

8,507

12.2

11.1

59

1.3

4,448

6.4

5.8

40

0.9

1,686

2.4

Total Housing

4,545

100.0

Occupied Housing

4,200

92.4

Owner-Occupied
Renter-Occupied

2,396
1,804

52.7
39.7

345

For Seasonal,
Recreational or
Occasional Use
With Over 1 Person
per Room

Vacant Housing

1.0

100.0

2.8

2.4

2.6

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census

TABLE C-2
TYPES OF HOUSING UNITS: 1980-1990

Single-Family Units
Duplexes
Multiple-Family Units
Other
Total

2,655

58.3

2,611

57.4

-1.7

41

0.9

37

0.8

-9.8

1,857

40.7

1,845

40.6

-0.6

5

0.1

52

1.2

+940.0

4,558

100.0

4,545

100.0

-0.3

SOURCE: U.S. Census: 1980-1990

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSNE PLAN

C-2

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING

over twice the percentage of multiplefamily units as the County (17.2%) or the
State (19.6%). The fact that St. Joseph
has a high percentage of multiple-family
housing units is not a new occurrence,
since in 1980, 40.7 percent of the City's
housing units were multiple-family.

Table C-3 compares St. Joseph's
housing to Berrien County and Michigan.
St. Joseph has a much lower percentage
of single-family homes, duplexes and
mobile homes than the County or the
State. This also shows that the City has
a much higher percentage of multiplefamily housing units than either of the
other two areas.

Figures C-1 and C-2 graphically
demonstrate the types of housing that
exist in St. Joseph and Berrien County.

With 1,845 multiple-family units (40.6% of
the City's housing units), St. Joseph has

TABLE C-3
TYPES OF HOUSING UNITS IN ST. JOSEPH,
BERRIEN COUNTY AND MICHIGAN: 1990
::'ii

tj~:: u8;®pb;': ::"I r,aera~R::l glio.8i§:I!i: t:MJ¢higa.ii /

1

I/Ncttr)b~r ;
Single-Family Units
Duplexes
Multiple-Family Units
Mobile Home, Trailer, Other

·.•.•.•.,.,:,.•ItC&gt;··.;-;.;.;.;. , , ••.•.

Nurti~;~r':'.:'·

.:::::::;::('}'o':':':•:;:•:

IIIINOm~~:::11::

2,611

57.4

51,424

74.0

69.5

37

0.8

1,331

1.9

3.4

1,845

40.6

11,984

17.2

19.6

52

1.2

4,793

6.9

7.5

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

C-3

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING
FIGURE C-1

Housing Values

HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE: ST. JOSEPH

The value of owner-occupied housing is
increasing in St. Joseph at a greater rate
than either Berrien County or Michigan.
Between 1980 and 1990 the median
value of owner-occupied housing in
St. Joseph increased from $36,500 to
$66,200 - an increase of 81.4 percent.
During the same period the median value
of the County's owner-occupied housing
increased by 55.8 percent to reach a
median value of $52,800. The State's
owner-occupied housing increased in
value by 55.4 percent to reach a median
value of $60,600. Table C-4 shows these
figures as well as the relationship
between St. Joseph's housing value and
the County's and State's housing values.

OTHER

DUPLEX HOMES

52 UNITS

37 UNITS
(0.8%)

(1.27.)-~

SINGLE
FAMILY
HOUSING

SOURCE: 1990 U.S.Census of Population
FIGURE C-2
HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE: BERRIEN COUNTY

MOBILE HOMES
4,793 UNITS

(6,91/.
DUPLEX HOMES
MULTIPLE
1,331 UNITS
FAMILY
(3.41/.)
HOUSING
11,984 UNIT"J..-T'ff""-_

(17.21/.)

Figure C-3 graphically demonstrates the
differences in the three areas.
FAMILY
HOUSING

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census of Population

0

The majority of owner-occupied housing
units (54.8%) in St. Joseph are valued
between $50,000 and $100,000. Table
C-5 shows that St. Joseph has a much
smaller percentage (24.6%) of owneroccupied housing units that were valued
under $50,000 than either the County
(46.8%) or the State (38.5%). In all of the
other categories (greater than $50,000),
St. Joseph has a higher percentage than
either Berrien County or Michigan.

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Since there is such a high proportion of
renter-occupied units in St. Joseph it is
important to compare the monthly rate
for renting a housing unit to other areas.
Table C-6 shows that St. Joseph's
median monthly rent is higher than either
Berrien County or Michigan. While St.
Joseph has a higher monthly median
rental rate, Michigan has a higher

C-4

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING
very uniform with the vast majority of
units being in the $250-$499 range.

percentage of units whose rent is over
$500. Rent in St. Joseph seems to be

TABLE C-4
MEDIAN VALUE OF OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS

::: :::~?§{

Coqhfy

1980

$39,000

$33,900

$36,500

107.7

93.6

1990

$60,600

$52,800

$66,200

125.4

109.2

55.4%

55.8%

81.4%

% Increase

SOURCE: U.S. Census: 1980-1990

TABLE C-5
VALUE OF OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS

Less than $50,000

511

24.6

15,460

46.8

38.5

$ 50,000 to $ 99,999

1,138

54.8

13,488

40.8

42.5

$100,000 to $149,999

235

11.3

2,590

7.9

11.4

$150,000 to $199,999

90

4.3

823

2.5

4.1

$200,000 to $299,999

55

2.7

- 473

1.4

2.4

$300,000 or More

47

2.3

207

0.6

1.1

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census

TABLE C-6
CONTRACT RENT

Less than $250

283

16.1

5,249

31.2

25.2

$ 250 - $ 499

1,279

73.0

10,995

65.3

58.0

$ 500 - $ 749

183

10.4

551

3.3

13.9

$ 750 - $ 999

5

0.3

22

0.1

1.9

$1,000 and More

3

0.2

25

0.1

1.0

Median (Dollars)

$351

$294

$343

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

C-5

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING
FIGURE C-3
VALUE OF OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS: 1990
PERCENT

60 . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

40

20

10

f.-.·.-!.·!::.j ST JOSEPH

IZZZI
c:::J

BERRIEN COUNTY
MICHIGAN

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census of Population

Age of Housing

The age of housing units in a community
often reveals the character of the
community. Older housing is the sign of
an established community while newer
housing is often the sign of a new and
expanding community.
St. Joseph,
which is a well established community,
has a large percentage of older homes.

Over 44 percent of the City's housing
units were built before 1939 (fable C-7).
Houses built between 1940 and 1959
account for over 30 percent of the City's
units. Houses built during the past 1O
years account for only 4.8 percent of the
City's housing units. For comparison,
13.6 percent of the State's housing units
were built between 1980 and 1990.

TABLE C-7
AGE OF HOUSING IN ST. JOSEPH

-.rr

-Year Structure Built • -•
1939 or Earlier

Number.of Housing Units ·

:-:

% ••:•:•'•:•:

2,006

44.1

1940 to 1949
1950 to 1959
1960 to 1969

680
698

15.0
15.4

565

12.4

1970 to 1979
1980 to March 1990
Total

379

8.3
4.8
100.0

217
4,545

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census of Population

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

C-6

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING

Table C-8 uses population projections
and projections for the median
household size (persons per household)
to determine the number of households
to the year 2015. Since household sizes
are projected to decrease throughout the
planning period, the number of
households will not decrease at as great
of a rate as the population of St. Joseph.
The population is expected to decrease
by 1.9 percent between 1990 and 2015.

Household Proiections

Although St. Joseph is essentially a fully
developed community, with very little
undeveloped land, there will most likely
be some changes in residential land uses
due to the changing needs of the area's
residents. In order to determine the
amount of land that should be devoted to
residential uses in the future, it is
necessary to determine the number of
housing units that will be required. The
coordination of several facts and
projections is required in order to project
housing needs in a community. Before
housing projections can be made it is
necessary to establish population
projections, projected household sizes,
trends relating to housing types and
current facts relating to housing in the
area. A vacancy rate also must be
established to allow residents to move to
larger, or smaller, homes and to allow
newcomers to move to St. Joseph.

During the same period the number of
households is expected to decrease by
0.3 percent.
In 2015 the projected
household size for St. Joseph is 2.03
persons per household and 2.42 persons
per household for the County. Additional
information (rable C-8) indicates that the
number of housing units in Berrien
County is projected to increase by 5.1
percent by the year 2015.

TABLE C-8
HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND OCCUPIED HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS

... :

&lt;: \tt 1 )-~ sf .J~seph::\:'.
\: :::x:::·· :f:_:Jf::::/. : Housihofd i

L

-....

'i::Y:e~f : ,:: Pdpuialiofr:;',. _ :;.· \/Lsiia :[ : \{f fouseholds

°.li tt9~;~b,otd{ - -• ·: ·•·.• ·• :: :/ . . ,t·

t :•::•. ;@,·/::, ff
; ·•· eoplllaticm : ,:,:::, \ Sii~ :

JiBouseti:6rds ·_.

1970

11,042

2.62

4,117

163,940

3.19

50,758

1980

9,622

2.14

4,296

171 ,276

2.80

60,276

1990

9,214

2.06

4,200

161,378

2.60

61 ,025

1995

9,151

2.05

4,198

161,900

2.55

62,423

2000

9,088

2.05

4,170

161,700

2.50

63,593

2005

9,067

2.04

4,180

160,300

2.47

63,808

2010

9,047

2.03

4,192

158,500

2.45

63,607

2015

9,040

2.03

4,188

157,800

2.42

64,111

SOURCE:

0

t&gt; •@[( sifri~n po~inty :./ ·ti ·&lt;f, }

U.S. Census of Population 1970, 1980, 1990; Michigan Department of Management and
Budget; Gove Associates Inc.

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

C-7

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING

Table C-9 uses the number of
households, established in Table C-8 to
determine the total number of housing
units required in the City of St. Joseph
and Berrien County by the year 2015.
The total number of housing units in
St. Joseph is projected to change very
little from the 1990 figure of 4,545 total
housing units. The total figures are
based on existing vacancy rates and
existing ratios between the number of
households and the number of housing
units in the City and County. Using this
methodology a total of 4,541 housing
units will be required in St. Joseph by
2015. This is four units less than existed
in 1990.

types of housing in the community that
existed in 1980 and 1990 were used to
project housing percentages to the year
2015. Once these percentages were
projected forward, the percentages were
applied to the "total" figures from Table
C-9 to determine the number of housing
units in each of the four categories.
Table C-1 O shows that the number of
single-family homes will decrease from
2,611 in 1990 to 2,570 in 2015 - a 1.6
percent decrease. During the same
period the number of duplexes is
projected to decrease by 1O units.
Multiple-family units are expected to
increase by 2.4 percent between 1990
and 2015 to reach a total of 1,889 units.

In order to determine what types of
housing will be needed in St. Joseph, the
TABLE C-9
HOUSING UNIT FORECAST
.·•&gt;:

Year

r

:-:·

St. Joseph
Occupied
Units

...

.

...

-;:;:

Total

::::·

:•::;:&gt;::::

·· Berrien County
ciccupie8·
Units

'°',,/

/

:-:

-::
:=::"

Total . .

1990

4,200

4,545

61,025

69,532

1995

4,198

4,551

62,423

71,125

2000

4,170

4,521

63,593

72,458

2005

4,180

4,532

63,808

72,703

2010

4,192

4,545

63,607

72,474

2015

4,188

4,541

64,111

73,048

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

C-8

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSING

TABLE C-10
MOUSING TYPE FORECAST: TOTAL UNITS

SingleFamily

2,655

Duplex

41

MultiFamily

1,857

Other
Total

5

58.3 2,611

0.9

37

40.7 1,845

0.1

52

57.4 2,603

0.8

36

40.6 1,857

1.2

55

4,558 100.0 4,545 100.0 4,551

57.2 2,586

0.8

32

40.8 1,849

1.2

54

100.0 4,521

57.2 2,579

56.9 2,582

32

0.7

27

40.9 1,867

41.2

1,882

1.2

54

0.7

1.2

54

56.8 2,570

0.6

56.6

27

0.6

41.4 1,889

41 .6

1.2

54

1.2

100.0 4,532 100.0 4,545 100.0 4,541

100.0

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

Under the category "Other" the number
has increased from 5 in 1980 to 52 in
1990. In St. Joseph there are no mobile
homes or trailers, so the category
consists entirely of "other." Other can
mean boxcars, houseboats or a variety
of other housing types. For the housing
projections, the percentage of other
housing will remain constant (1.2% of the
area's housing) since it is difficult to
project the need for this category of
housing.

units will be required to meet the
projected need for multiple-family
housing. The total figure in Table C-11
indicates that by 2015 an excess of four
housing units will exist if no changes are
made and if all existing housing units are
properly maintained.

Table C-11 uses the figures established
in Table C-1 O to show the changes that
will be necessary.
The table lists
excesses and deficiencies based on
existing housing units. Using projections,
and the 1990 figure of 2,611 single-family
units in St. Joseph, Table C-11 shows
that in 2015 there will be an excess of 41
units. Similarly, it can be seen that an
excess of 1O duplexes will exist in 2015.
By 2015 an additional 44 multiple-family

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

C-9

�0

TABLE C-11

§

HOUSING TYPE FORECAST: FUTURE NEEDS BASED ON EXISTING UNITS

0

"I1
(/)

;3

....

: : ri;;::•:•

,,_.(Jl\~~~~,11i: ti;I.~.: l:i~\~~~il1!ll!,~iJ,••I

I

I

E=8

2,586

E = 25

2,579

E = 32

2,582

E = 29

36 I

E = 1

32

E = 5

32

E = 5

27

1,845 I 1,857 I

D = 12

1,849

0=4

1,867

D = 22

55 I

D = 12

54

D=2

54

I

D=6

4,521

E = 24

4,532

0

(/)

~

~
(/)

§
8

(j

"C

~

SingleFamily
Duplex
MultiFamily

2,611

37 I

52 I

Other
Total

4,545

I

2,603

4,551

1

""~'~'',i l~~]~ffl
I

E = 41 I

-1.6

E = 10

21 I

E = 10 I

-27.0

1,882

D = 37

1,8891

D = 441

+2.4

D=2

54

D=2

I

D = 21

+3.8

E = 13

4,545

D=0

4,5411

E = 41

-0.08

2,570

54

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

8
&amp;1

(j

....0
I

~

,_1

�ECONOMY

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY
The economy of a community is often
difficult to limit to the community's
borders. This is true because many
people do not choose to live and work in
the same community. The St. Joseph
area does seem to offer its residents a
large percentage of their jobs since in
1980, 86.0 percent of the City's workers
lived less than 20 minutes from their
place of employment. While a large
portion of the City's workers were
employed near their homes, at least 14.0
percent worked outside of St. Joseph.
Unemployment

A community's unemployment rate is
often used to indicate the economic
vitality of the area. To better understand
what an area's unemployment rate
means it should be compared with other
unemployment rates to develop a relation
between local and regional rates that

shows the relative economic condition of
an area.
Table D-1 shows the
unemployment rates for St. Joseph,
Benton Harbor, the Benton Harbor MSA
(Berrien County) and Michigan. Between
1988 and September of 1991 the
unemployment rates in St. Joseph have
been consistently lower than for the
County or the State as a whole. The
difference between St. Joseph's
unemployment rate and Benton Harbor's
is so drastically different that it is difficult
to believe the two cities are adjacent to
each other. While St. Joseph's rates are
lower than the comparison areas' rates,
the City's unemployment rates do tend to
relate to the State and County's
unemployment rates - which have risen
since 1988. The Benton Harbor MSA
(Berrien County) and Michigan have had
similar unemployment trends since 1988,
with their trend lines crossing every year
(Figure D-1).

TABLE D-1
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

4.8

5.2

5.2

6.7

22.4

23.9

23.8

28.9

Benton Harbor MSA
(Berrien County)

6.8

7.4

7.3

9.4

Michigan

7.6

7.1

7.5

9.2

St. Joseph
Benton Harbor

SOURCE: Michigan Employment Security Commission

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

D-1

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY
FIGURE D-1
UNEMPLOYMENT TRENDS: 1988-1991

UNEMPLOYMENT
RATE (%)

30

25

•

.

. . . . . . . .. .

........•..................•.

20

15

10

•· ....... . .
5

-- - -

- - -

---

- -- -- -- --

---- - --

__.

0--------------------------.. .
198B

19B9

1990

YEAR

SEPTEMBER 1991

-ST. JOSEPH
• • • • • • • • • BENTON HARBOR
· · · · • · · · · BERRIEN COUNTY
- - - - MICHIGAN

SOURCE: Michigan Employment Security Commission

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

D-2

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY

Employment by Industry

The types of jobs tnat people in a
community have can identify a lot about
the community. Table D-2 compares
employment in St. Joseph with
employment in Berrien County and
Michigan. The information shows that in
1990 St. Joseph had a much lower
percentage of agricultural related
employment (0.2%) than either the
County (2.8%) or the State (2.0%) - this
is not surprising since St. Joseph is an
urban area. It also is not surprising that
the County has a higher percentage of
agricultural employment than the State since Berrien County is a major
agricultural County.
The percentage of construction related
employment in St. Joseph was higher
than either the County or the State in
1990. Construction accounted for 5.3
percent of St. Joseph's employment, 5.0
percent of Berrien County's and 4.9
percent of the State's.
Employment relating to the manufacturing of both nondurable and durable
goods was lower in St. Joseph than
either the County or the State.
In
St. Joseph 5.0 percent of the
employment was related to the
manufacturing of nondurable goods - the
County figure was 6.5 percent and the
State's figure was 5.6. Employment
relating to the manufacturing of durable
goods accounted for 18.7 percent of the
City's employment - lower than the
County's rate of 21.3 percent or the
State's figure of 19.0 percent.
The
manufacturing of durable goods is the
largest employer for all three areas.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Employment relating to transportation
accounts for 2.3 percent of St. Joseph's
jobs - less than the County or the State.
Communications and public utilities
related jobs account for 2.6 percent of
the City's employment. This figure is less
than the County's figure of 2.9 percent
but greater than the State's figure of 2.1
percent.
Wholesale trade in St. Joseph is related
to 5.4 percent of the City's employment.
This is a larger proportion than either the
County or the State. The second largest
employer in St. Joseph is related to retail
trade. With 17.2 percent of the area's
employment related to retail trade,
St. Joseph is very similar to both the
County and the State.
St. Joseph's
figure of 4.9 percent for employment
related to finance, insurance and real
estate (FIRE) is higher than the County
(4.3%) and lower than the State (5.4%).
Employment related to health services in
St. Joseph is lower than either the State
or County - this is unusual since the
Mercy Memorial Medical Center is
located in St. Joseph. Education related
employment in St. Joseph accounted for
9.1 percent of the City's employment lower than Berrien County but higher
than Michigan. In the four remaining
categories (business and repair services,
personal entertainment and recreation
services, public administration and other
professional and related services),
St. Joseph has higher percentages than
either the County or the State.

D-3

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY
TABLE D-2
1990 EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY: ST. JOSEPH, BERRIEN COUNTY, MICHIGAN

11

0.2

2,044

2.8

2.0

Construction

245

5.3

3,630

5.0

4.9

Manufacturing - Nondurable Goods

233

5.0

4,790

6.5

5.6

Manufacturing - Durable Goods

874

18.7

15,588

21.3

19.0

Transportation

108

2.3

2,411

3.3

3.3

Communication and Other Public
Utilities

119

2.6

2,122

2.9

2.1

Wholesale Trade

252

5.4

3,053

4.2

4.0

Retail Trade

805

17.2

12,300

16.8

18.0

Finance, Insurance and Real Estate

229

4.9

3,167

4.3

5.4

Business and Repair Services

228

4.9

3,089

4.2

4.7

Personal, Entertainment and
Recreation Services

205

4.4

2,622

3.6

3.9

Health Services

356

7.6

5,605

7.7

8.9

Educational Services

426

9.1

7,184

9.8

8.6

Other Professional and Related
Services

398

8.5

3,622

5.0

5.8

Public Administration

182

3.9

1,927

2.6

3.8

Agriculture,Forestry, Fishing, Mining

SOURCE: 1990 U.S. Census of Population
Table D-3 shows how employment
changed in St. Joseph between 1980 and
1990.
Overall, the number of jobs
increased in 11 of the 15 categories.
The most dramatic increase was in
construction. Between 1980 and 1990
the number of construction-related jobs
increased from 129 to 245, or an

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

increase of 89.9 percent. The second
largest increase was in wholesale trade
which increased by 71.4 percent between
1980 and 1990 to reach a 1990 figure of
252 jobs.
The third largest change
occurred in "other professional and
related services" which increased from
304 employees in 1980 to 398 employees

D-4

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY
decreased from 1,065 employees in 1980
to 874 in 1990. The second largest
decrease occurred in the nondurable
manufacturing which decreased from 315
to 233 jobs. The third largest decrease
was in the public administration category
which decreased by 70 personnel during
the period. Overall, manufacturing and
public jobs decreased in the City while all
others either increased or remained
relatively unchanged.

in 1990. This was followed by business
and related services which increased by
88 employees to reaoh a total of 228.
These numeric increases were followed
by health related services, transportation,
education, finance, insurance and real
estate, retail trade,
personal
entertainment and communications and
public utilities. The largest decrease
during the 10-year period occurred in the
manufacturing of durable goods which

TABLE 0-3
EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY IN ST. JOSEPH: 1980, 1990
JrtitiAAeriC=

:'.~lf/&lt;,,,

:!li[i.\~; .· ~1~B;::

20

0.5

11

0.2

-9

-45.0

Construction

129

2.9

245

5.3

+116

+89.9

Manufacturing - Nondurable Goods

315

7.1

233

5.0

-82

-26.0

1,065

24.0

874

18.7

-191

-17.9

65

1.0

108

2.3

+43

+66.2

Communication and Other Public Utilities

117

2.6

119

2.6

+2

+1.7

Wholesale Trade

147

3.3

252

5.4

+105

+71.4

Retail Trade

789

17.8

805

17.2

+16

+2.0

Finance, Insurance and Real Estate

210

4.7

229

4.9

+19

+9.0

Business and Repair Services

140

3.1

228

4.9

+88

+62.9

Personal, Entertainment and Recreation
Services

202

4.5

205

4.4

+3

+1.5

Health Services

308

6.9

356

7.6

+48

+15.6

Educational Services

383

8.6

426

9.1

+43

+11.2

Other Professional and Related Services

304

6.8

398

8.5

+94

+30.9

Public Administration

252

5.7

182

3.9

-70

-27.8

4,446

100.0

4,671

100.0

+225

+5.1

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Mining

Manufacturing - Durable Goods
Transportation

Total

SOURCE: 1980, 1990 U.S. Census of Population

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

D-5

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY

Principal Economic Base Employers

Economic base employers are industries
whose goods or services are chiefly
exported from the area and are often the
reason a variety of other employers
exist in an area. The Principal Economic

Base Employers in Berrien County are
shown in Table D-4. These employers
are essential to the area's economic
stability since they help bring wealth into
the community and because of the
multiplier effect these industries have on
creating jobs in other local industries.

TABLE 0-4
PRINCIPAL ECONOMIC BASE EMPLOYERS IN BERRIEN COUNTY

Whiripool, Benton Harbor

1,885

Home Appliances

Zenith Data Systems, St. Joseph

1,830

Computers, electronic equipment

Bendix Automotive Systems, St. Joseph

1,200

Auto parts

Leco, St. Joseph

1,200

Analytical instruments

United Technologies Auto., Niles

650

Miscellaneous plastic products

Gast Mfg., Benton Harbor &amp; Bridgman

641

Compressors, air and gas

Simplicity Patterns, Niles

509

Dress patterns

Tyler Refrigeration, Niles

484

Refrigeration and heating

Modern Plastics, Benton Harbor

463

Molders, inject. thermoset

Weldun International, Bridgman

425

Flex assembly and test systems

Comstock Mich. Fruit, Benton Harbor

355

Canned fruits

National Standard, Niles

350

Reinforcing and specialty wire

Ag-Tech Crop Sprayer, Niles

300

Horticulture sprayers

Hughes Plastics, St. Joseph

270

Custom molded thermoplastics

Wollin Products, Stevensville

250

Miscellaneous plastic products

Industrial Rubber Goods, St. Joseph

242

Molded and extruded rubber

Premier Tool &amp; Die, Berrien Springs

230

Zinc and aluminum die cast

Sheperd Products, St. Joseph

165

Hardware, stampings

AUSCO Product Company

207

Malleable castings

New Products Corp., Benton Harbor

210

Die cast component parts

Total Employees

11,931

SOURCE: Michigan Department of Commerce, January 1992

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

D-6

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY

described individually throughout the
Plan, i.e. public employees, school
employees and employees at Mercy
Memorial Medical Center, as well as
others.

Table D-5 lists other employers in the
area that can be considered base
employers - since their products or
services are exported from the area.
Other major employers in the area are

TABLE D-5
OTHER EMPLOYERS IN BERRIEN COUNTY

=

i ::trt=Im:: m:

,5pipl9ye.~s
All Phase Electric, St. Joseph &amp; Benton Harbor

250

Electrical parts distribution

Hanson Mold, St. Joseph

100

Mold manufacturers

Vail Rubberworks, St. Joseph

100

Rubber and polyurethene

Advanced Products Corp., Benton Harbor

30

Tool and die supplies

Alreco Metals, Inc., Benton Harbor

133

Aluminum smelter

Benton Harbor Engineering, Benton Harbor

100

Hydraulic cylinders

Custom Products, Stevensville
D.C. Cook Plant, Bridgman

21

Sheet metal products

750

Nuclear Power Plant

plus (400
contracted
employees)

Cast-Matic Corporation, Stevensville

140

Aluminum and zinc, die casting

KitchenAid, St. Joseph

247

Home Appliances

SOURCE: City of St. Joseph; Gove Associates Inc.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

0-7

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY
throughout the County. Table D-6 shows
that two sites of less than .5 acres were
available in St. Joseph in 1991 - a very
small amount of land. Many of the areas
surrounding St. Joseph have large
amounts of available industrial land.

Available Industrial Sites in Berrien
County

The Michigan Department of Commerce
has published a list that details the
amount of industrial land available

TABLE D-6
AVAILABLE INDUSTRIAL SITES
(as of December 1991)

Benton Harbor

18

469

190

0

Benton Township

18

491

199

1

Berrien Springs

1

3

Bridgman

2

107

43

0

Buchanan

4

0

0

1

Buchanan Township

1

5

2

0

Chikaming Township

1

0

0

0

Coloma

1

0

0

0

Hagar Township

2

6

2

0

Lake Township

3

63

25

0

Lincoln Township

3

30

12

0

Niles

8

19

8

Niles Township

6

105

42

0

Oronoko Township

3

34

14

0

St. Joseph

2

0

0

1

St. Joseph Township

4

0

0

0

Stevensville

1

0

0

0

Three Oaks

1

0

0

0

Watervliet

1

25

10

0

Watervliet Township

1

0

0

0

81

1,357

548

4

County Total

0

Zero acres indicates less than half an acre available.

SOURCE: Michigan Department of Commerce

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

D-8

�r
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY
St. Joseph's median household income
was $15,150, or 93.1 percent of the
County's figure of $16,274. Between
1979 and 1989 the City's per capita
income increased by 99.0 percent nearly doubling in 10 years. In 1989 the
City's per capita income was $18,421, or
145.8 percent of the County's per capita
income of $12,636. Between 1979 and
1989 the household income for
St. Joseph increased by 88.6 percent to
reach a figure of $28,566. This is 104.8
percent of the County's household
income of $27,245 - even though
St. Joseph's average household size is
considerably smaller.

Income

Another major indicate&gt;r of an area's
economic condition is income. Incomes
indicate the buying power of the
residents of an area, when compared
with the surrounding area. In 1979, St.
Joseph's per capita income was $9,257,
or 137.7 percent of Berrien County's per
capita income of $6,723. Table D-7
shows that while the per capita income
was higher in St. Joseph than in Berrien
County, the median household income
was higher in Berrien County - this
can be attributed to
St. Joseph's
smaller median household size. In 1979,

TABLE D-7
INCOME FIGURES FOR ST. JOSEPH AND BERRIEN COUNTY: 1979 AND 1989

:] : : : :~?'ti)
,: :cnahg~(

•
•II
•
•II
•
•

s1siI, ·

tt=::;:::1

St. Joseph

$9,257

$18,421

99.0

$15,150

$28,566

88.6

Berrien County

$6,723

$12,636

88.0

$16,274

$27,245

67.7

St. Joseph as
% of County

137.7%

145.8

93.1%

104.8

SOURCE: 1980 and 1990 U.S. Census of Population

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

D-9

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ECONOMY

Taxes

The truces in a community are essential to
support the services that are required to
operate and maintain a community.
Table D-8 compares the 1990 State
Equalized Valuations (SEV) and the
various true rates of 1O cities in Western
Michigan (including St. Joseph). By
comparing these cities with each other it
is easier to understand how true rates and
SEVs influence the ways that a city
generates funds. St. Joseph's 1990 SEV
of $188,025,387 is second only to
Holland's SEV of $516,270,200 - but
Holland's population count is over three
times greater than St. Joseph's. The
City's per capita SEV of $20,406 is 146
percent higher than the 1O city average
figure of $14,020. South Haven's per
capita SEV of $17,214 is the second
highest per capita SEV. For comparison,
each community's county, city, school
and total truces are shown in Table D-8.

St. Joseph. While St. Joseph's true rate is
lower than many of the comparison
communities, the SEV in St. Joseph is
higher. This means that even though
St. Joseph's true rates are lower, only one
community (Holland) collected more
truces than St. Joseph. On a per capita
basis, St. Joseph residents paid
$1,220.42 compared to the 1O city
average of $858.52.

In St. Joseph, the County (Berrien) true
rate of 5.99 mils is lower (92%) than the
10 city average county true rate of 6.54
mils. Only Holland's county true rate of
.43 mils is lower. St. Joseph's City true
rate of 16.7 mils is higher (109%) than
the 1O city average true rate of 15.37 mils.
Both Niles (18.65) and Three Rivers
(18. 71) have higher city true rates than
St. Joseph. The school system true rate
of 37 .12 mils in St. Joseph is lower (97%)
than the 10 city average of 40.03 mils.
Of the 1O communities only one, South
Haven, has lower school true rates.
When all of the true rates are combined,
the overall true rate in St. Joseph of 59.81
mils is lower (97%) than the 1O city
average of 61.94 mils.
Of the 10
communities three - Sturgis, South Haven
and Otsego - have lower true rates than

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

D-10

�••••
0

TABLE D-8

§

COMPARISON OF TAX RATES

:111i

~

....0~

!

§
@

~·~~~·~·· ml!llm1

iliBr~Jli'hmi\!lii

St. Joseph

$188,025,387

$20,406

5.99

$1,125,839.61

16.70

$3,139,497.49

37.12

$6,979,591 .96

59.81

$11,244,929.06

$1 ,220.42

Sturgis

$118,822,984

$11 ,730

6.36

$755,714.17

10.80

$1,283,298.70

39.54

$4,698,141 .97

56.70

$6,737,154.84

$665.07

Three Rivers

$n,169,090

$10,491

6.36

$494,611.41

18.71

1,455,110.20

39.32

$3,057,802.85

64.39

$5,007,524.46

$675.51

Allegan

$54,872,255

$12,068

6.76

$370,733.42

14.95

$820,340.21

39.09

$2,144,808.30

60.79

$3,335,881 .93

$733.64

$95,763,996

$17,214

7.24

$693,256.43

16.53

$1 ,583,304.45

I

35.81

I

$3,434,815.12

I

59.64

I

$5,111 ,316.00

I

$1 ,026.67

Niles

$120,175,500

$9,646

5.99

$719,582.80

18.65

$2,241 ,oao.19

I

42.48

I

$5,105,386.11

I

67.12

I

$8,066,oso.so

I

$647.46

Holland

$516,720,200

$16,807

5.43

$2,805,813.82

14.63

$7,560,795.90

I

40.64

I $20,999,687.79 I

60.10

I

$31,366,297.51

I

$1,020.21

Springfield

$45,979,060

$8,237

7.07

$325,094.94

15.50

$712,675.43

49.61

$2,280,920.00

72.18

$3,318,690.37

I

$594.53

Otsego

$53,262,300

$13,529

6.76

$359,856.08

11 .00

$585,892.74

37.36

$1,989,741 .05

55.11

$2,935,489.87

I

$745.62

Hastings

$76,4n,aoo

$11 ,678

7.48

$571,740.38

16.20

$1 ,238,940.36

39.25

$3,002,028.97

62.93

$4,812,109.11

I

$734.88

Average

$134,786,857

$14,020

6.54

$822,224.31

15.37

$2,062,093.63

40.03

$5,369,292.47

61.94

$8,253,610.41

I

$858.52

(')

~

~~...

South Haven

SOURCE: Michigan Department of Treasury; Gove Associates Inc.

~
(")

0I

........

I

�PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

The level of service provided to the
residents of a community can be
measured in several ways - many of
which are difficult to put into quantifiable
figures. Some of the less quantifiable
methods include the feelings of the
community's residents towards the City
and the service provided, the quality of
the City's employees, and other factors
that a number often cannot define. One
method to show the level of service in a
community is to make comparisons with
other communities.
In January of 1992, a survey of 1O
communities (including St. Joseph) was
taken to compare population, total fulltime employees, residents per employee
and employee distribution.
For this
comparison part-time and volunteer
forces were not included. The results of
this survey allow residents to compare
their community with nine other
communities in Western Michigan. The
results of this survey are shown in Table
E-1. The average population of the 1o
communities is 9,614, which is very
similar to St. Joseph's 1990 population of
9,214. The average number of full-time
employees is 91.1 - considerably less
than St. Joseph's work force of 125.
The table shows that St. Joseph has one
employee for every 73. 7 residents, the
only community with more employees
per resident is South Haven with 62.5
residents per employee. The average
number of residents per employee is
105.6. St. Joseph has a considerably
larger proportion of City employees than
the average of the 1O communities. This
means that a higher level of service is
provided to St. Joseph residents than
many other communities in Western
Michigan.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The distribution of City employees is also
shown in Table E-1. St. Joseph's Police
Department employs 26 persons,-or 20.8
percent of the City's work force. This
force is four persons larger than the
average figure for the 1O communities,
but accounts for a smaller percentage of
the communities work force than the
average. The City's Fire Department
employs 14 full-time employees - a larger
force than the 1O community average of
10.3 employees. The percentage of fire
fighters, relative to total City employment,
is 11.2 percent, very similar to the 1O city
average of 11.3 percent. St. Joseph's 53
repair or maintenance related personnel
accounts for 42.4 percent of the City's
employees - higher than the 1O city
average of 38.2 percent. The 13 full-time
employees used to operate the City's
library and other similar resources
accounts for 10.4 percent of City
personnel - higher than the average of
8.5 percent.
The number of
administrative personnel in St. Joseph is
19. This figure accounts for 15.2 percent
of the City's employees and is a lower
percentage than the 1O city average of
17. 1 percent.
These figures indicate that St. Joseph
has more employees per resident than
the average community, but that no
department has a disproportionately high
or low number of employees when
compared with employee distribution in
the nine other communities.

E-1

�TABLE E-1

0

COMPARISON OF COMMUNITIES

§
~
Cll

dll11flllltl

'.'"-l

0
Cll
tTI

~

St. Joseph

~

Sturgis*

9,214

125

73.7

26

20.8

14

11 .2

53

42.4

13

10.4

19

15.2

10,130

101

100.3

16

15.8

14

13.9

44

43.5

9

8.9

14

13.9

4

180.2

16

25.2

9

14.2

25

39.4

3

4.7

10.5

16.5

0

2.1

19

39.6

5

10.4

7

14.6

0

0

Three Rivers

7,413

63.5

Allegan

4,547

48

94.7

16

33.3

South Haven t t

5,563

89

62.5

20

22.5

11

12.4

35

39.3

4

4.5

19

21 .3

0

Niles

12,458

145

85.9

24

16.5

14

9.7

76

52.4

11

7.6

20

13.8

0

Holland

30,745

227.05

135.5

64.0

28.2

27.0

11.9

55.75

24.6

29.55

47.4

20.9

3.35

23.1

10

25.6

0

8

20.5

0

12

46.2

0

6

23.0

0

18

38.3

2

4.3

5

10.6

0

34.8

38.2

7.7

8.5

15.6

17.1

0 .7

4.0

tTI

8
(')

~

Springfield

5,582

39

143.1

12

30.8

9

Otsego

3,937

26

151 .4

8

30.8

0

Hastings

6,549

47

139.3

18

38.3

4

8.5

Average

9,614

91 .1

105.6

22

24.1

10.3

11.3

*An additional 295 employees work in the City-owned Hospital
**Although the 4 full-time Library employees are not City employees, they have been Included in the total count.

SOURCE: 1990 Census of Population; Gove Associates Inc.

tTI

N

I 13.0

1.4

0.8

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

City Hall
The St. Joseph City Hall, located at 620
Broad Street, provides office space for
the City Manager, the City Clerk and
Treasurer, the Assessor, the Community
Development Office and Purchasing,
Engineering Personnel, Inspection
Personnel and various support
personnel.
Additionally, the Police
Department is housed in City Hall and
the Fire Station is connected directly to
the City Hall. The 3-story masonry
building which houses the City offices
currently has 15,438 square feet of
space, an additional 6,754 square feet of
space is located in the adjacent Fire
Station. The City Hall and Fire Station,
which were both built in 1913 and have
since had extensive renovations, were
evaluated in 1991. The report "City
Hall/Fire Station Facilities Study" details
many of the facility's shortcomings and
list the advantages and disadvantages of
renovating the existing building versus
building new facilities. The following
recommendation is taken directly from
the report:
Recommendation
City Hall - The existing City Hall
building was built in 1913 and has
had numerous remodeling in 78
years of service for the people of St.
Joseph.
The structural engineering report
notes that the structure (frame of
building) is in very good condition.
But that pollution and time has taken
its toll on the exterior/interior
architecture of the building. This will
require repairs and updating of
materials.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The mechanical and electrical
engineering reports note that the
building systems need total
replacement. The existing systems
have worked well for many years, but
have become obsolete.
These
systems need to be updated to serve
the people of St. Joseph into the
year 2000 and beyond.
There are code deficiencies, with
the big issue being AD.A. or the
Americans with Disabilities Act, which
becomes effective January 26, 1992.
This is a federal civil rights legislation
designed to improve access to jobs,
work place and commercial spaces
for disabled people. The State of
Michigan is incorporating AD.A.
requirements into its barrier free code
requirements. This means elevators,
ramps and barrier free restrooms are
required in the existing City Hall.
Fire Station - The existing Fire Station
was also built at the same time as
the City Hall in 1913, and has had
many remodelings in 78 years. The
structural engineering report notes
that the building has some structural
problems and will need structural
rework if renovated. The mechanical
and electrical engineering reports
note that this building, like City Hall,
needs total rework of its systems.
Again, time and age have taken their
toll on the building's mechanical and
electrical systems, as was the case
of the electrical fire last year. Like
City Hall, the Fire Station needs work
on code deficiencies such as barrier
free requirements and facilities for
women.

E-3

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

There are major working problems
trying to run a state-of-the-art Fire
Station in a 78 year old building. The
11 foot high overhead doors with 14
foot high ceiling in existing apparatus
room does not work well with today's
equipment that needs 14 foot high
overhead doors with 16 foot high
ceilings in apparatus bays. This type
of problem has caused damage to
the equipment and could cause injury
to personnel.
Conclusion - The space study shows
that the City government needs now
and in the next five years about 60
percent more space, but that over
the next 20 years only 182 SF of
added space after the first five years
is needed.
The areas with the
greatest needs are the Police, Fire,
Engineering, Inspection and City
Manager/ Personnel Departments.
As part of the space study requirements four renovation/remodeling
concepts have been developed with
preliminary cost estimates.
Estimates for potential construction of an
entirely new facility have also been
prepared. Building a totally new
facility would be the least costly vs.
renovation of existing buildings.
Today a new facility is about 80
percent efficient (ratio of circulation,
exterior walls, mechanical spaces,
etc. to usable space). The existing
City Hall is about 45 percent efficient
with renovation and additions it may
be able to increase efficiency to
about 65 percent to 70 percent.
The existing old buildings have
served the City well for 78 years,
and have a lot of character and

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

sentimental value. The report states
"Renovation of these buildings will
show your commitment to your motto
'Holding onto the past...Reaching out
to the future;' but to do renovation
will be more costly."
Police Department

The City's Police Department, which is
located in the City Hall, occupies 3,289
square feet of space throughout the City
Hall. The City maintains no holding cells
due to insurance costs and the
availability of County Jail holding cells.
The Department has 19 full-time certified
officers including the Police Chief, two
Lieutenants and a Detective and one
part-time certified officer. In addition to
the officers the Department consists of
four 911 dispatchers, two clerical
employees and one parking enforcement
officer. The Department has five marked
vehicles, one of which is a reserve
vehicle, three unmarked vehicles and a
van which is used by the Department for
a variety of purposes. The Department
has a four person dive team (soon to be
a 5 person unit). With two rivers running
through the City, and Lake Michigan this
seems a necessity.
Some of the needs facing the
Department include the need to update
the communication equipment used by
the Department, more personnel and
more training. The increased demands
placed on law enforcement personnel
requires that training is constantly
updated. Some of the goals of the St.
Joseph Police Department include
expanding cooperative efforts with St.
Joseph Township and Lincoln Township,
and instituting a Marina Patrol for the
many marinas in the community.
E-4

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

In 1990 there were 1,932 complaints, or
five percent less than the 2,033
complaints filed in 1989. While the
number of complaints decreased
between 1989 and 1990, the number of
criminal arrests increased. In 1989 there
were 539 arrests, this number increased
by 20.2 percent in 1990 to 648 arrests.
During the same period the number of
traffic arrests increased by 24.2 percent from 3,229 in 1989 to 4,011 in 1990. In
1990 the City issued $47,331 dollars
worth of parking tickets.
Fire Department

The Fire Department is located adjacent
to the City Hall, in the 2-story fire station.
The Department consists of 14 full-time
personnel including the Fire Chief and
the Fire Marshall. In addition to the 14
full-time personnel there are 11 paid, oncall firefighters. Ideally, the fire station is
staffed by four firefighters at any time,
but a minimum of three firefighters is
allowed. The four police dispatchers are
also used to dispatch the Fire Department for fire and other emergencies. The
Department has three engines one of
which is used as a reserve unit. The
newest engine is a 1983 Pierce that is
capable of pumping 1,000 gallons per
minute. The second on-line engine is a
1973 American LeFrance capable of
pumping 1,500 gallons per minute. This
vehicle is also fitted with a 50 foot
"telesquirt" which assists in fighting fires
in multi-story buildings. The reserve
engine is a 1954 American LeFrance that
is capable of pumping 1,000 gallons per
minute. In addition to the fire engines
the Department maintains a utility /pickup
truck, a van for the inspector and a
station wagon for the Fire Chief.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The City's water system provides an
overall flow of 3,500 gallons per minute
for fire fighting.; In 1990 the Department
responded to 199 calls, usually the
Department responds to between 220
and 225 calls per year. The Department
currently has several needs. The major
need is to update its facilities by either
renovating the existing building or
building a new facility. If a new facility is
built it should be more centrally located
than the existing station. Another major
requirement is the addition of a
ladder/pumper truck to the Fire Station's
fleet of vehicles.
Updating existing
vehicles is another need, as is replacing
4" fire mains and providing improved
maintenance to hydrants. Some of the
goals of the Department include
increasing crew sizes to five people
(instead of 4). This would allow for safer
operation of the vehicles by allowing
more than one person operate an
engine. Another goal is to increase
support staff by adding a secretary/
clerical worker to the Department.
Increasing computer literacy for Fire
Department members is also a goal of
the Department.
Recreational Facilities

The parks and other recreation related
facilities in and around a community
directly contribute to the quality of life for
area residents. St. Joseph is aware of
the importance of recreation to an area
and has implemented a 5-year recreation
plan to guide the City's recreational
programs into the future. The following
inventory of area facilities is taken from
the Plan:

E-5

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES
TABLE E-2
RECREATIONAL AREA FACILITIES

, ':tl; " r vtit~ m•::c:t? \lf

-:.--·

.-,.-.

lii'

it

\F

..
:~::;:;::::

,:;@(\= -. Fibillttea .·

....

t;t:,.lK. ?f ,

.•.--·
--:-:-.

t h:;tes ,.,
'-:-:-::-·

Berrien County Facilitie•

Rocky Gap Park

Swimming , Picnic /vea

Madaline Bertrand Park

Hiking, Shelter, Disc Golf Course, Nature lveas

Love Creek Park

Nature Center, Exhibits, Hiking, Restrooms, Book Store

11.0

Silver Beach/Broad Street

Under Development

22.0

3.0

Total Acreage
State of Michigan

157.0

Facilitia■

Warren Dunes State Park

Camping , Swimming, Hiking, Lake Michigan Shore Sand Dunes

Warren Woods State Park

Hiking , Picnic /veas, Educational Programs

Grand Mere State Park

Hiking, Educational Programs

1,190.0
500.0
1,022.0

Total Acreage
City of St. Joseph

121 .0

2,712.0

Facilitie ■

Tlscornia Park{Tiscornia Park Drive

Swimming , Picnic lvea, Pavilion, Lifeguards, Restrooms

16.0

West Basin Marina/ Edgewater

79 Slips, 100 A. of Broadside Dockage 94 off-street Parking

7.96

Spaces, Restrooms, Store
Bluff Park/ Lake Blvd .

Lake View, Memorials, Band Shell , Restrooms, Formal Garden,

7.34

Community Events
Upton lvboretum/ Blossomland Bridge

River, Frontage, Asphalt Paths, Lighting, Benches, Gazebo

Kiwanis Park/Wolcott Avenue

Large Playfield, 2 Ball Diamond (1 Lighted), 6 Lighted Tennis

2.3
19.2

Courts, 2 Horseshoe Pits, 1 Basketball Court, 2 Shuffleboard
Courts, Shelter, Restrooms, Off-street Parking

'
'

I

Point Park/ State and Main

Passive Recreation, Aesthetic Value

0.3

Boat Launch Site/Industrial Island

Concrete Launch Ramp

3.0

Lion 's Park/ Pine Street

Passive Recreation, Lake View, Hiking

Milton Park/ Niles Avenue

Small Neighborhood Park, Lights, Sandlot, Paths

Stubblefield Tennis Courts/ St. Joseph H.S.

7 Tennis Courts

Dickenson Park/ Lakeview

2 Ballfields (1 Lighted)

8.39

Whittlesey Park/ Napier Avenue

lee Skating with Warming House, Rocket (Youth) Football

2.64

Lookout Park/ Lakeshore Drive

Passive Recreation, Picnic lvea

8.96

Riverview Park/ Niles Ave. South

Passive Recreation, Fully Enclosed Lodge, 2 Shelters 2 Picnic
/veas, 3 Ballfields (1 Lighted), Restrooms, Boat Launch, Park,
Fee for Non-City Residents

(St. Joseph Township)

17.22
2.12
4.0

Total Acreage

107.00

206.43

SOURCE: City of St Joseph Recreation Plan, 1990

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

E-6

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIF.S

The City's 1990-1995 Recreation Plan
has determined that an adequate amount
of land is currently devoted to public
recreational purposes. The plan stresses
the importance of the City's location at
the mouth of the St. Joseph River and
feels the expansion of marina services
should be encouraged. The long-range
objectives from the City's 1990-95
Recreation plan are listed on the
following page.

In addition to the parks, the area's
schools are also used for many
recreational activities as described in the
public schools section of this Plan.
St. Joseph's proximity to Lake Michigan
provides many recreational opportunities
that relate to the lake. In the City's
boundaries, there are several marinas
(Table E-3) offering a total of 740 slips.
In addition to the 740 slips in St. Joseph
there are currently an additional 780 slips
in Benton Harbor and St. Joseph
Township.

TABLE E-3
MARINAS IN THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH AND NEARBY MARINAS

________________ ______
,,,::c Name .

........_

# of Slrps -

.;.;.;.._

City of St. Joseph
Brian's Harbor

220

Harbor Isle Marina

175 (42 owned by condominium •
50-75 additional slips
planned)
_,;__..;..__..;.._

Pier 33 -

East
South
West

_____

~

44
127

49

Waterfront Marina

53

West Basin Marina

72

Shoreview Condominiums

18

Total

758

Nearby Marinas
Eagle Point (St. Joseph Township)

503 (more planned)

--'----------~

New Harbor Marina (City of Benton
Harbor)

56 (107 more planned • engineering and
permits ready • waiting for economy)

Pier 1000 (Benton Harbor)

220

ng

Total (Existing)
SOURCE: City of St Joseph, Gove Associates Inc.

0
-

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

- - - - - - - - ~ ~- - --

-----

E-7

--

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

Long-Range Objectives
Lookout Park:
A) Expansion of Lookout Park
should be programmed to
provide erosion protection along
the edge of Lakeshore Drive.
Silver Beach Area:
A) Continue to work with Berrien
County and adjoining property
owners to assure a public beach
access to Lake Michigan.
B) Facilitate residential development
and similar land uses that will
compliment the recreational
activities anticipated in this area.
School District Facilities:
A) Continue to work with the School
District to provide a broad range
of recreational facilities and
programs.
B) Maintain a formalized relationship
with the School District to assure
continuing funding for any joint
recreational activities.
Ravine Area Protection:
A) Provide protection for major
ravine areas in the City through
scenic easements, dedications,
or reservations.
B) Encourage protection of such
areas by allowing density credits
in development proposals.
C) Acquire ravine areas wherever
possible.
Bike Path System:
A) Implement the Bike Path System
as previously recommended.
B) Provide for dedications and/ or
reservations of the bike path

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

system when new development
takes place.
Marina Improvements:
A) Continue to refine and improve
facilities at West Basin Marina.
B) Provide additional slips and
dockage in the St. Joseph River
to enhance the leisure-time
recreational opportunities
provided by these natural
resources.
School District

An area's school system is an important
part of a community. Schools educate
the area's youth and prepare them for
adult life in the community. Not only do
a
community's schools benefit the
existing residents, they are often the
reason new residents choose one
community over another. Schools also
are an important part of a community's
social character. Since schools are vital
to a community's well-being, it is
essential that a thorough description of
the school system is included in this
Plan, and that the system is included in
the planning process.
The St. Joseph Public School District
covers 22 square miles of land and
serves residents in the City of St. Joseph
and portions of St. Joseph, Lincoln and
Royalton townships. Between the 197778 school year and the 1991-92 school
year, overall enrollment in the School
District decreased by 33.0 percent.
Table E-4 breaks the student enrollment
into three separate school age categories
and shows total enrollment figures for the
District. Between 1977-78 and 1981-82
overall enrollment decreased by 23.0
percent with similar decreases in the
E-8

�j, 1, 1

11

0

TABLE E-4

(')

~

STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDS

~ I,·

.• I ...,.,.·.,.·.,.·.·.,.,.·.,.,.. v,, , , ........ -,.......·.L.,. ,......,.,.......,.•. L,.,,-,., ....................,.. , .

~

.....

ta1r lffl

0
Cl.)

~
j
&gt;
@
0

n

Elem.

(tl!i

1

1

llill llm

•

1,716

1,571

1,456

1,387.3

1,290

-24.8

1,212

1,151

1,150

1,142

1,147

-5.4

1,004

1,039

1,056

1,113

1;-160

+ 15.5

-32.4

567

584

520

450

460

-18.9

496

490

445

400

255

-28.4

538

523

507

529

551

+2.4

-2.8

1,427

1,294

1,230

1,179

1,108

-22.4

1,029

1,017

976

988

1,004

-2.4

924

866

818

770

774

-16.2

-45.8

-23.o I

2,131

2,506

-s.4 I 2,466

2,485

+0.8

-33.0

(K-5)
Middle
School

(6-8)

"'1:1

~

High
School

(9-12)
Total

3,110

I

3,449

I

3,206

I

3,016*

I

2,asa••

*Includes 7 Special Education Students
**Includes 15 Special Education Students
SOURCE: St. Joseph Public Schools; Gove Associates Inc.

tT1

\0

I

2,658

I

2,511

I

2,530

I

I

2,428

I

2,381

I

2,412

I

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

three school age categories. Between
1982-83 and 1986-87 overall enrollment
figures decreased by 8.4 percent - a
much smaller percentage decrease than
the previous period. During this period
the middle school enrollment figures
decreased by 28.4 percent - a much
greater decrease than elementary school
or high school figures. Enrollment in the
St. Joseph Public School System
increased by 0.8 percent between 198788 and 1991-92. The majority of the
increase is due to the 15.5 percent
increase in elementary students.
Between 1977-78 and 1991-92
elementary student enrollment decreased
by 32.4 percent, Middle School
enrollment decreased by 2.8 percent and
High School enrollment decreased by
45.8 percent. The total student count in
1991-92 of 2,485 students was 1,225 less
than the 1977-78 figure of 3,710.
Enrollment projections for the School
District indicate an increase in total
students between 1992-93 and 1996-97
of 9.0 percent. Table E-5 shows the
projections for the three age groups.

Table E-6 shows the level of service
provided by the School District during the
1981-82 and 1991-92 school years.
During this 1O year period the overall
staff size of the school system has
decreased by 19.5 percent but the
number of students per teacher (class
size) has also decreased. Table E-6
shows that during the 1981-82 school
year there were 21.1 students per
teacher. During the 1991-92 school year
there were 20.3 students per teacher - so
more attention could be given to
students during the 1991-92 school year.
This is not due to the hiring of additional
teachers, but is due to fewer students.
During the 1O year period the number of
teachers decreased from 135.5 to 122.7 a 9.4 percent decrease. During the
same period the number of students
decreased from 2,858 to 2,485 -a
decrease of 13.1 percent. Overall, the
number of students to School District
employees increased from 10.2 during
the 1981-82 school year to 11.0 during
the 1992-92 school year. The major
changes in the distribution of employment occurred between professional
occupations and nonprofessional
occupations.

TABLE E-5
FIVE YEAR STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS

1,191

1,218

1,212

1,251

1,264

+6.1

Middle School {6-8)

572

605

628

636

646

+12.9

High School {9-12)

765

746

782

816

846

+10.6

2,528

2,569

2,622

2,703

2,756

+9.0

Elementary (K-5)

Total

SOURCE: St. Joseph Public Schools

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

E-10

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

personnel, food service employees,
operations/maintenance staff and
transportation employees. It is apparent
that the school system desires to keep
the number of employees that are
directly involved in teaching the student
as high as possible, while cutting back
on the number of employees that are not
directly involved in the education of
St. Joseph's youth.

The number of students per professional
School District staff decreased from 17.4
in 1981-82 to 16.5 in, 1991-92. The
number of students per nonprofessional
School District staff increased from
24.5 in 1981-82 to 32.9 in 1991-92, both
in the number of employees and in the
staff to student ratio has been in
the noninstructional
support
staff.
These employees include administrative

TABLE E-6
LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL DISTRICT
,',''\:}•:•
.

Classification

Number

Classroom Teachers
Professional
Nonprofessional

1991-92

1981-82

Ratio of
Students·.••·
to Staff

Number

. Ratio of
.•.$tudents
to Staff

%Change
1981-82 to
· 1991-92

135.5
134.0
1.5

21.1

122.7
121.2
1.5

20.3

-9.4

7.0
7.0
0.0

408.3

14.8
6.3
8.5

167.9

+111.4

Professional
No.,professional
Pupil Services
Professional
Nonprofessional

7.5
6.5
1.0

381.1

10.3
9.3
1.0

241 .3

-36.7

Instructional Support Staff
Professional
Nonprofessional

8.0
2.0
6.0

357.3

8.0
3.0
5.0

310.6

0.0

123.0
15.0
108.0

23.2

70.5
11 .0
59.5

35.2

-42.7

-

-13.1

Added Needs

Noninstructionai Support Staff
Professional
Nonprofessional
Student Count

2,858

-

2,485

Professional Subtotal

164.5

17.4

150.8

16.5

-8.3

Nonprofessional Subtotal

116.5

24.5

75.5

32.9

-35.2

281

10.2

226.3

11.0

-19.5

Total

SOURCE: St. Joseph School District; Gove Associates Inc.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

E-11

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIFB

St. Joseph Beauty College is also located
in the Jefferson School building. The
North Lincoln School property is being
leased to the Berrien County Intermediate
School District which uses the facility for
special education programs.
The
Washington School was sold to
KitchenAid.

During the 1991-92 school year, there
were 226.2 School District employees.
This figure includes 127.5 professional
teaching staff members and nine
nonprofessional teaching staff members.
Instructional support staff, i.e.
counselors, account for 10.3 staff
members and instructional staff services,
i.e. library personnel, account for eight
staff members. The administrative staff
consists of 21 people, food service
accounts for 12 people, operations and
maintenance accounts for 26 employees
and the transportation staff accounts for
8.5 members.

The transportation of students to school
and special events is accomplished by
the 8.5 person transportation staff and
the seven school buses the District
maintains.
The existing problems currently facing
the District are related more to external
relations with the State of Michigan than
internal operations of the school system.
It is not felt that any serious problems are
currently facing the School District.
Short-range goals are developed annually
that relate to the operation of the School
District and these short-range goals are
often related to longer-range goals.

The St. Joseph School District consists of
five schools. These schools are listed in
Table E-7. Since 1980 three schools
have been closed in the St. Joseph
School District: Jefferson, North Lincoln
and Washington.
Jefferson School is now being used for
School District Administration personnel
and alternative education programs. The

TABLE E-7
ST. JOSEPH PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES

Grades Served

K-5

K-5

K-5

6-8

9-12

1991-92 Student Count

353

405

402

551

n4

Year School Built

1958

1964

1948

1967

1957

Major Renovations

1963

1953

Major Facilities

Student Capacity
Acreage/Site Size

1959
Gym,
Planetarium,
Auditorium

Gym,
Auditorium,
Pool

420

504

448

520

1,574

7

10

4.83

35

31.5

SOURCE: St. Joseph Public Schools

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

E-12

•

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

Mercy Memorial Medical Center

Mercy Memorial MedicaJ Center (MMMC)
is part of the Lakeland Regional Health
System which is also comprised of Mercy
Center in Benton Harbor, Pawating
Hospital in Niles, Mercy Memorial
Nursing Care Center in St. Joseph and
several specialized clinics throughout the
area.
MMMC was built in 1951 (at that time it
was called Memorial Hospital) and
expanded in 1969. In 1977 Memorial
Hospital merged with Mercy Hospital in
Benton Harbor to form the Southwestern
Michigan Health Care Association. In
1985 Memorial Hospital was renamed the
Mercy Memorial Medical Center. In 1990
consolidation of acute care to MMMC
was completed.

In 1988 MMMC opened a lab and X-Ray
Center at 2500 Niles Road and in 1989 a
speech and learning clinic in Berrien
Springs. The following year MMMC
opened Lakeside Lab, X-Ray and
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Center and Pharmacy in the Cedarwood
Medical Center.
In 1991 MMMC
acquired Shoreham Terrace Nursing
Home and opened a pharmacy in Berrien
Springs.
A _partial listing of the center's extensive
services, facilities and capabilities are:
Heart Center - This program was
initiated in 1972 and expanded in 1990.
The facilities include:

•
•
•
•

0

Two cardiac catheterization labs
Short- and long-term recovery
EKG room
Education/screening room
CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

•

Cardiac surgery facilities

The center is capable of performing any
type of cardiac surgery except
transplants and pediatric cardiac surgery.
Nuclear Center - This program, which
uses radioactive isotopes to diagnose
and treat diseases, was instituted in 1974
and expanded in 1990. The center
maintains a testing laboratory, SPECT
camera and a hot lab. The center is
capable of diagnosing and treating a
variety of disorders affecting the thyroid,
bones, brain, liver, lungs and other areas
of the body.
Cancer Care Center - This program was
also instituted in 1974 and expanded in
1990. The center maintains a linear
accelerator and simulator, a 20 bed
inpatient center and seven outpatient
rooms.
The Cancer Care Center's
capabilities include radiation oncology
therapy and chemotherapy.
Surgery .-- The surgery facilities were
expanded in 1985 and consist of five
general surgery suites, three specialized
surgery suites, an endoscopic
procedures room,
a cytosopic
procedures room, pre- and post-surgery
rooms and outpatient rooms. The center
is capable of a variety of surgical
procedures such as:

•
•
•
•
•
•

Cardiac Surgery
Vascular Surgery
Neurosurgery
Orthopedic Surgery
Plastic Surgery
Ophthalmologic Surgery

E-13

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

The team also has 24 hour anesthesia
coverage, laser surgery and a respiratory
therapy team for open heart surgery.
Critical Care Unit - This unit was

expanded in 1990 and consists of a 22
bed critical care unit with individual
rooms. Each room is equipped with a
variety of monitoring equipment.
Capabilities of the unit include a
combined medical/surgical critical care
unit and a 2-1 patient/nurse ratio.
Rehabilitation Center - This center was

established in 1988 and expanded in
1989. The center includes a 10 bed
inpatient rehabilitation unit, outpatient
facilities, a sports medicine center and a
speech therapy center.
Capabilities
include rehabilitation for victims of
strokes, accidents and debilitating
disease with physical, occupational and
recreational therapy. The center can
also treat a variety of disorders
associated with speech, language,
hearing and swallowing.
Family Birthing Center - The center was

expanded in 1985 and includes five
labor-delivery-recovery rooms, a surgical
suite and four nurseries.

1,894 employees - up nearly 20 percent
from the 1990 count of 1,586. In 1992
there were 145 doctors affiliated with
MMMC - up 45 percent from 100 doctors
in 1988.
Table E-8 shows some selected statistics
for MMMC such as the number of
admissions between 1989 and 1991.
Current issues being faced by MMMC
include the combining of health care
services to provide a more regional
approach to health care; the decreasing
availability of qualified health care
workers; and charitable care for
uninsured users of the center's facilities.
The goals of MMMC includes providing a
comprehensive system of health care
serving all stages of life and responding
to the needs of the community. MMMC
will seek new opportunities and initiate
alliances to meet these goals. MMMC
will also continue to promote more
interaction between physicians and other
health care providers. The center will
advocate ·equal access to health care to
improve the health status of area
residents.
MMMC recently purchased the Lakeview

Radiology - In addition to facilities
located at MMMC, two outpatient
locations are available.

School property and is devising a plan to
develop the property.

Other services include a pediatrics
facility, a substance abuse treatment
program, 24 hour emergency room
services, a psychiatric unit and a variety
of other services.
In 1992 the 280 bed facility had 1,794
employees, plus an additional 100 at the
MMMC Nursing Care Center for a total of

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

E-14

]

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES
TABLE E-8
SELECTED STATISTICS

!~!2l !•:• 1•!·
)J j 9$Qf 1991}&gt;
1

1

1

1

!l:! li:l !i

1

1

Admissions
Angioplasty*
Ambulatory
Care*
Births
Cardiac
Catheterization *
Surgery
X-Ray

11,100

10,419

-6.1

9,905

-4.9

177

294

66.1

514

74.8

11,628

13,341

14.7

17,002

27.4

1,203

1,357

12.8

1,174

-13.5

862

1,177

36.5

1,515

28.7

7,977

9,092

14.0

9,658

6.2

62,088

74,699

20.3

77,811

4.2

*Primarily outpatient
SOURCE: Mercy Memorial Medical Center

,
,

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

E-15

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

residents. Table E-9 lists churches that
are in and around St. Joseph.

Churches

Churches are an important part of
community life for many of St. Joseph's
TABLE E-9
CHURCHES IN THE ST. JOSEPH AREA

American Baptist church of St. Joseph

3265 S. Cleveland, St. Joseph, Michigan

First Baptist Church

902 Broad, St. Joseph, Michigan

First Landmark Missionary Baptist Church
Chapel

3835 Washington, St. Joseph, Michigan

Niles Avenue Baptist Church - SBC

1301 Niles Avenue, St. Joseph, Michigan

Oakridge Baptist Church

766 Oakridge Drive, St. JosepO00h, Michigan

North Lincoln Baptist Church

683 Maiden, St. Joseph, Michigan

St. Joseph Catholic Church

211 Church St., St. Joseph, Michigan

Niles Road Community Church

3800 Niles Road, St. Joseph, Michigan

Riverview Park Christian Church

2929 Niles Road, St. Joseph, Michigan

Christman Reformed Church of St. Joseph

3275 Washington St., St. Joseph, Michigan

First Church of the Nazarene

3351 Niles Avenue, St. Joseph, Michigan

First Congregational Church

2001 Niles Avenue, St. Joseph, Michigan

Pilgrim Congregational United Church of Christ

1200 W. Glenlord Road, St. Joseph, Michigan

St. Paul's Episcopal Church

914 Lane Drive, St. Joseph, Michigan

Chapel An Evangelical Free Church

4250 Washington, St. Joseph, Michigan

Grace Lutheran Church

404 E. Glenlord Road, St. Joseph, Michigan

Saran Lutheran Church - ELCA

510 Main St., St. Joseph, Michigan

Trinity Lutheran Church

715 Market, St. Joseph, Michigan

Church of Christ

3550 Niles Road, St. Joseph, Michigan

St. Joseph Seventh-Day Adventist Church

2929 Niles Avenue, St. Joseph, Michigan

Berrien Unitarian Universalist Fellowship

4340 Lincoln St., St. Joseph, Michigan

St. Peter's United Church of Christ

623 Church St., St. Joseph, Michigan

Zion Evangelical UCC Church

3001 Veronica, St. Joseph, Michigan

Arden Limited Methodist Church

4841 N. US-31, St Joseph, Michigan

First United Methodist Church

3003 Leco Court, St. Joseph, Michigan

SOURCE: 1988-89 Benton Harbor-St. Joseph Ameritech PagesPlus

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

E-16

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES
Historic Sites

There are currently nine historic sites in
St. Joseph that are listed on the State's
Register of Historic Sites. None of the
sites are listed on the National Register

of Historic Sites. Table E-1 0 lists the
sites, the location and the date the site
was put on the State's Register of
Historic Sites and the date a marker was
placed on the site.

TABLE E-10
HISTORIC SITES IN ST. JOSEPH

·. ·...,tr::H1is Bi~J~~#efi.I:I:
William Burnett Trading Post

East of Miller Dr. and Langley
Ave., on the western shore of
the St. Joseph River

State Register - 03-13-62
Marker - o1-17-65

Congregational Church of
St. Joseph

601 Main Street

State Register - 03-13-62

William S. Dunbar House

814 State Street

State Register - 01-18-80

Edgewater Club Annex

375 North Ridgeway Street

State Register - 07-20-84

Fort Miami

Lake Boulevard and Ship Street

State Register - 02-18-56
Marker - 04-26-56

Fort St. Joseph and
St. Joseph Mission

200 Lake Boulevard

State Register - 07-20-89

Herring's First Flight

Silver Beach

State Register - 05-10-68

Old St. Joseph Historic District

State and Main Streets and
Lake Boulevard

State Register - 09-17-81
Markers (2) - 08-07-84

St. Joseph Public Library

500 Main Street, corner of Elm
Street

State Register - 06-18-82

SOURCE: Michigan Department of State Bureau of History

The YWCA of Southwestern Michigan

The YWCA, located at 508 Pleasant
Street, has been located in the present
building since 1925. An addition to the
building was completed in 1958.
Facilities at the center include a fitness
center, swimming pool, gymnasium,
Nautilus room and a day care center,

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

which currently serves 80 families. The
YWCA offers many programs for area
residents such as swimming lessons,
gymnastics .ballet, Tae Kwon-Do,
aerobics, aqua-aerobics, yoga, senior
fitness classes and babysitting for users
of the facilities. The center has a staff of
60 and currently has approximately 1,500
members.

E-17

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

KRASL Art Center

The KRASL Art Center, located at 707
Lake Boulevard, is a nonprofit organization supported by memberships and
donations. The Center is accredited by
the American Association of Museums
and is open seven days a week, free of
charge. The Art Center is sponsored by
the St. Joseph Art Association and was
opened in 1980. The Center is operated
by four full-time employees and two parttime employees. Additionally there are
numerous volunteers that help make
many of the Center's programs a
success.
The 3-level building, which is
handicapped accessible, offers 2,200
square feet of exhibition space plus an
additional 2,000 square feet of classroom
space.
The three galleries house
numerous exhibitions that are changed
monthly.
In addition to the many
exhibitions, the Center sponsors a
number of classes for people of all ages.
Other opportunities include day trips,
travel abroad, an art shop, music
programs and dinner lectures - as well as
a variety of other opportunities. The
KRASL Art Center has between 20,000
and 25,000 visitors annually. The Center
also sponsors an art fair every July that
attracts as many as 75,000 people from
around the Midwest to the two day fair.
The Benton Harbor-St. Joseph
YMCA Family Center

The YMCA, located at 3665 Hollywood
Road was opened in 1981 replacing an
older facility in Benton Harbor. In 1984
an addition was added to the YMCA that
includes four racquetball courts and a
mens' full service area.
In 1987

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

additional parking and a multipurpose
room was added. Recent membership
trends indicate an increase in the number
of users. Table E-11 shows membership
trends, by sex, between 1988 and 1990.
TABLE E-11

YMCA MEMBERSHIP TRENDS

%

':) 988

1"989

1990

:::,

Increase
' 88-90

Male

1,783

2,749

3,224

80.8

Female

1,402

2,228

2,557

82.4

Total

3,185

4,977

5,781

81 .5

SOURCE: Benton Harbor-St. Joseph YMCA

These dramatic increases demonstrate
the important role the YMCA plays in the
St. Joseph area. The YMCA estimates
that 49 percent of its members live in
St. Joseph, the remaining members live
in the surrounding communities. Since a
large portion of the YMCA's income
(55. 7% in 1990) are from membership
dues, the total income has increased
along with the memberships. In 1990 the
YMCA's income was $906,380. Programs
currently sponsored by the YMCA
include the following:
- Exercise and Aerobic Classes
- Prenatal Exercise Classes
- Strength Training Classes
- CPR Training
- Arthritis Classes
- Aquatics for Various Ages
-Youth Team Sports
- Karate
- Racquetball
- Adult League Sports
-Golf
-Day Camp

E-18

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

-

Nursery and Preschool Programs
Halloween Party
Leadership Training •
Plus many others

The YMCA is aware of the importance of
planning for the future. More information
relating to the YMCA can be found in the
report titled "YMCA Moving Ahead: A
Working Paper Developed for Use at the
Long-Range Planning Meeting, June 20,
1991".
Maud Preston Palenske
Memorial Library

The City of St. Joseph, as well as the
Charter Township of St. Joseph is served
by the Maud Preston Palenske Memorial
Library. The Library, built in 1966 with an
addition added in 1981, has
approximately 25,000 square feet. In
December 1991 the Library had 72,475
volumes. Additionally, the library houses
many periodicals, records, audio and
video cassettes, toys, cameras,
microfiche and other media forms. The
Library offers a TDD (Telecommunication
Device for the Deaf) to allow people with
a hearing impairment to communicate
using the telephone system. Enlarging
equipment and a magnifier are available
for the visually impaired. A variety of
programs are offered for residents of all
ages including story hours, cooking
contests, crafts, puppet shows and a pet
show in the summer for area children.
Programs designed for adults include
photography shows, art exhibits,
,. -genealogy, a book club, investment
counseling and various club meetings.
The Maud Preston Palenske Memorial
Library is a member of the Southwest
Michigan Library Consortium and the
Michigan Library Association.
The

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Library has 12 employees - several of
which are considered part-time. The
circulation in 1990-1991 was 185,251. At
the time of this report the Library's Board
is conducting a needs analysis.
Preliminary data indicates the Library is in
need of additional seating space,
periodicals and audio books.
Water

Lake Michigan offers an unlimited source
of fresh water for the people and
businesses of St. Joseph. Water is
drawn from the Lake via an intake riser
1,500 feet from shore from a depth of
14.5 feet. The water is considered to be
moderately soft but is influenced by
weather conditions, discharge from the
St. Joseph River and the shifting
topography of the Lake bottom. The City
of St. Joseph's water system provides
water for 9,214 residents. In addition,
the system provides water for over 82
percent of St. Joseph Township's 9,613
residents, nearly 86 percent of Lincoln
Township's 13,604 residents, all of
Stevensville's 1,230 residents, 100
percent of Shoreham's 737 residents and
74 of Royalton Township's residents. 1
Applying the 1980 percentages, and 1990
Census figures, a total of 30,837
residents are served by the water
system.
The water treatment plant,
originally built in 1931, has had numerous
improvements. In 1975-76 the plant's
capacity was expanded to 16 million
gallons per day. In 1972 a booster pump
station was constructed at Marquette
Woods Road in Lincoln Township and in

1

1990 Census of Population, City of
St. Joseph
E-19

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACIL~
FIGURE E-1

1967 a 750,000 gallon elevated tank was
constructed.

AVERAGE DAILY WATER PRODUCTION
Figure E-1 shows the daily amount of
water produced by the plant based on
yearly averages.
The 6.068 million
gallons per day produced in 1988 was
27.7 percent higher than the 1980
average of 4.753 million gallons per day.
On June 13, 1988, the plant produced
15.39 million gallons of water to meet
high demands brought on by the
drought.
This figure (15.39 million
gallons per day) represents 96.2 percent
of the plant's designed capacity. The
average per capita production in 1988
was 192 gallons per day. The St. Joseph
Water system has a total storage capacity of 5.12 million gallons. Over half (2.87
million gallons) of the storage capacity is
located at the treatment plant. The
remaining storage areas are the elevated
storage (0.75 million gallons) and ground
storage (1.5 million gallons) tanks.
Emergency water supplies are available
via interconnections between the City of
Benton Harbor and St. Joseph.
Wastewater Treatment

In May of 1991 the "Benton Harbor/St.
Joseph Area-Wide Sewer/Water Study"
was completed for the Community
Economic Development Corporation.
The report details existing capacities of
the water and sewage treatment facilities.
Wastewater treatment is provided by the
joint wastewater treatment plant owned
and operated by the City of St. Joseph
and the City of Benton Harbor. An eight
member Board with three representatives
from St. Joseph operates metering
stations to determine the wastewater
flows from each municipality using the

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION
(MIWONS OF GALLONS)

7-r-------------•

4+-----------~•
3+-----------~•
2~------------11

0

..,__-r--.---r----.----,---.-........--.---...,......J
~

~

#

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

YEAR

SOURCE: City of St. Joseph
facilities.
These flows are used to
determine the distribution of costs for
operating the treatment plant between
the users of the system.
The treatment plant is located on Marina
Island, within the City of St. Joseph. St.
Joseph has a gravity sewer which was
built in the early 1950s in conjunction
with the treatment plant and Benton
Harbor's gravity sewer system.
In
addition to these two gravity systems, a
20 inch force main was constructed in
1976.
A modified activated sludge process for
secondary treatment is used to treat the
area's wastewater. Anaerobic digestion
is used to stabilize the sludge and
vacuum filtration is used for sludge
dewatering.
Phosphorus removal is
performed by chemical precipitation. The
plant was designed to provide 90 percent
removal of suspended solids and
biological oxygen demand (BOD), and 90
E-20

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

percent removal of phosphorus. The
plant is designed to process an average
wastewater flow of 13~0 million gallons
per day (mgd) with a maximum daily
wastewater flow of 19.5 mgd. The peak
hydraulic capacity of the plant is 24.0
mgd. The plant design is also based on
a raw wastewater suspended solids load
of 28,200 lb/day and biological oxygen
demand (BOD) of 37,950 lb/day. 2 The
treatment plant is well maintained and
consistently provides quality treatment at
an affordable cost. The plant currently
has the capacity to meet the area's
wastewater needs. Projections -indicate
that in 2010 the plant will be able to
adequately handle the average daily
wastewater flow, but peak day flow will
exceed the plant's current capacity.
Improvements to the plant that will allow
it to meet peak day flows is estimated to
cost $1.5 million (CEDC). While the
combined treatment plant is shared by
Benton Harbor, Benton Charter
Township, St. Joseph Charter Township,
the City of St. Joseph, Lincoln Charter
Township and Royalton Township, each
area is responsible for maintaining their
own sewers. St. Joseph's sewer system
still contains some combined sewers
(sanitary and storm sewers). The City is
in the process of addressing this problem
as well as problems relating to the age of
the system and infiltration of the system.
The 1991 report also concludes that
detailed inspections of major trunk lines
should be undertaken to determine
specific capacities and to locate any
structural problems.

provided through an integrated power
network.
Over 65 percent of the
electricity generated by Indiana Michigan
Power is generated in coal burning
plants. Nearly 35 percent is generated
by Cook Nuclear Plant in Bridgman,
Michigan, and less than one percent is
hydro power.
Indiana Michigan Power generates 6, 159
Megawatts of electrical energy.
Residential rates are 4.66 cents per
kilowatt hour for under 500 hours. The
rate increases to 5.16 cents per kilowatt
hour for over 500 hours. There is also a
monthly service charge of $7.05 per
customer.
The national average for
electrical energy is 7.87 cents per
kilowatt hour. Indiana Michigan Power
provides energy for Berrien, Cass, Van
Buren and St. Joseph counties in
Michigan, with limited services provided
to Kalamazoo County and Allegan
County. Indiana Michigan Power has
424,077 residential customers, 46,623
commercial customers, 4,497 industrial
customers and 2,079 other customers for
a total of 477,276 customers.
The
company serves an area that covers
7,307 square miles of land in Indiana and
Michigan and has 20,882 miles of
electrical line.

Electricity

Indiana Michigan Power provides
electricity to the residents and
_businesses of St. Joseph. Power is

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

2

Community Economic
Corporation

Development

E-21

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIF.S
Natural Gas

Michigan Gas Utilities Company, which is
owned by Utilicorp United, is the fourth
largest provider of natural gas in
Michigan. Toe company serves 165,000
customers throughout Michigan. The
company's Western Michigan Division
provides natural gas for many of west
Michigan's communities - including St.
Joseph and Benton Harbor. Residential
rates are $3.87 per 1,000 cubic feet.
Commercial rates are $3.92 per 1,000
cubic feet. Of the four largest natural
gas companies in Michigan, Michigan
Gas Utilities Company has the lowest
rates.
Public Transportation

Toe Twin Cities Area Transit Authority
provides Dial-A-Ride services to the
residents of Benton Harbor, Benton
Township and the majority of St. Joseph.
Regular rates for services in St. Joseph
are $2.00. For residents over 62 or
medicare card holders, the fee is $1.00 children's rates are $1.20. These fees
account for 21 percent of the Authority's
operating budget. The remaining costs
are covered by the Federal Government
(30%), the State of Michigan (40%) and
the City of Benton Harbor (9%). The
Authority has a total of 35 employees 24 of which are full-time and 14 of which
are drivers. The Twin Cities Area Transit
Authority, located at 275 East Wall in
Benton Harbor, serves an average of 635
passengers per day. Existing needs
include more busses and more drivers a lack of additional funding limits the
number to the existing levels. Future
goals include longer operating hours and
expanded service areas.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

National Functional
Classification System

As residents of a community, people
know from experience which roads are
local and which roads are used to travel
to adjacent or distant communities. The
same idea has been used by the U.S.
Department of Transportation to classify
street systems. There are essentially
three types of street classifications - with
variations for each classification. Arterial
streets are designed to maximize mobility
through limiting access and maximizing
speed. Local streets are designed to
maximize access by limiting speed and
maximizing access. Collector streets are
meant to act as a "bridge" between the
two other types of streets. Map E-1
shows the National Functional
Classification System for St. Joseph. The
major arterials are I-94/US-33, Niles
Avenue, Lake Shore Drive, Napier
Avenue, Wayne Street and portions of
Port and Ship streets. The minor arterial
streets include Hilltop Road, Cleveland
Avenue, Lake View Avenue, Lake
Boulevard, Langley Avenue, Broad Street
and Ship Street. Collector streets include
Hawthorne Avenue, Wallace Avenue,
• Kingsley Avenue, Wolcott Avenue, Lake
Street, Vine Street and Upton Drive. The
remaining streets are all classified as
local streets.
Average Daily Traffic Trends

Even though St. Joseph's population has
been decreasing most of the traffic count
stations operated by the Michigan
Department of Transportation (MOOT)
have shown an increase in traffic
between 1980 and 1990. The location of
the stations and the average daily traffic
counts for 1980, 1985 and 1990 are
E-22

�~

I._/~,/&lt;.

I'(

~&amp;

C

~0

LEGEND

I

NON-FREEWAY PRINCIPAL
ARTERIAL--CONNECTING
LINKS OF RURAL MINOR
ARTERIALS

3
f■ ■ ■ i

NON-FREEWAY PRINCIPAL
ARTERIAL--NONCONNECTING LINK

I
E

-

~

&lt;f

8

~

MINOR ARTERIAL STREETS
I

I

I

I

I

CO~LECTOR STREETS

~

s
LOCAL STREETS

I

II "'""'"'"~~
-•w

liAvt: I
a

•

__ J

•

I

L . .i

V/\r-i
· :::::,111 I ~:=L
- ~ 1

I

I SAINT

MAPE1

SCAL£

~

o·

500· 1ooo· 1500·

•

2500'

GOVE ASSOCIATES INC.

i

1.,.1

JOSEPH,
MICHIGAN

NATIONAL FUNCTIONAL
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

I

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES

shown on Map E-2. Although most of
the stations increased over the 1O year
period, several stations decreased.
Station A, located on 1-94 /US-33 between
the northern and southern portions of
St. Joseph, decreased by 17.7 percent
during the 10-year period. The most
dramatic decrease occurred at Station B,
which is located on Wayne Street
between St. Joseph and Benton Harbor.
The station decreased by 30 percent
during the 10-year period from 18,000 in
1980 to 12,600 in 1990. Station 0,
located on the south side of the City,
decreased by 10.2 percent during the
period. Other stations that decreased
include Stations C, D and J.
Station M, located on Niles Avenue north
of the City boundary, increased by 32.5
percent between 1980 and 1990. This
increase, from 20,000 to 26,500 was the
most dramatic. Station K on Cleveland
Avenue increased from 12,000 to 15,600
- an increase of 22.5 percent. Station L
on Lakeshore Drive increased from
12,000 to 14,800 - an 18.4 percent
increase.
Station H on Main Street
increased by 16.4 percent.
Other
stations that increased include Stations
E, F, G, I and N. In 1990 the station with
the highest count was Station M on Niles
Avenue, which had a count of 26,500.
Stations E and F both had 1990 counts
of 24,400. In 1980 Station E had the
highest traffic count with a count of
23,000.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

E-24

�~

I_/~

~&amp;

,/I.. ''(

C

~(.J

LEGEND
STATION

A
8
C

D
E
F
G

H

I
J

K
L
M
N
0

1980
13,000
18,000
9,000
8,800
23,000
22,000
11,000
12,800
12,500
16,000
12,000
12,500
20,000
1'1,000
13,700

1985
1990
14,200 10,700
14,900 12,600
7,500
8,700
8,500
8,700
22,800 24,400
24,300 24,400
13,000 11,800
13,500 14,900
13,100 13,900
16,800 15,800
13,000 15,600
11,300 14,800
22,800 26,500
12,800 11,300
13,100 12,300

&lt;'

i1

I

8

~
~4M

J✓,
~/2/~r

~

~f%

v~~

~~a

ds~t!?l
88
~~ oO~
~□
AACJL
-,□o2:TE~:f .:":;·~

~

✓

~~"-UooB~~

~Q

rj.ui:

;in~e; Jc!

t;"A\£ 11 ~,,MOHA\11(]~\£

A~

1

-' ~
~

_.J

)~6~
~11-s9aD[J~~c

1~

~~

3I~

~□~GOV

~I
1(ilrl
7...~II-- ilNl!/
All[

~II

~~·~□n'l£Sll:R
Al/En~~C
n
"•

g)LONI

-

loR

3

I

2

WV
[

nnw,n~n~

, . . ifN

II.""'-

I

■

:JIii

■~
~~

c:::&gt;

•

__ J

•IL . .i••~,--------r,--~MA~P~E-~2---~1
SAINT JOSEPH,

~-

SCAL£

~-,.

o·

~

I

I

soo·

I
1000· 1500·

MICHIGAN

2500·

GOVE ASSOCIATES INC.

AVERAGE DAILY

I

TRAFFIC TRENDS

I

�PUBLIC PARTIC/PA TION

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Introduction

In order to create a pJan that reflects the
desires of the area's residents, it is
necessary to determine how people feel
about a variety of topics. This has been
done by distributing a community-wide
questionnaire, interviewing members of
the Planning Commission and City
Commission, other interested people,
and through an initial public meeting and
the monthly Planning Commission
meeting. Additionally a public hearing
was held at the end of the planning
process.
This Section of the Plan
contains the St. Joseph questionnaire
results and the key person survey
results.
St. Joseph Questionnaire Results

During June and July of 1992 a planning
survey questionnaire was developed,
distributed, collected, tabulated and
analyzed by Gove Associates, City Staff
and the Planning Commission. The
questionnaire was mailed with the tax
bills for homeowners and businesses and
distributed by hand to the City's major
multi-family units. In order to have a
statistically valid survey, 300 responses
were required, but 750 questionnaires
were returned to the City - a very good
return rate for a survey, 18.75 percent.
The tabulated results of the survey
questionnaires are included at the back
of this section. The results of the survey,
on a question by question basis, follows:
Tabulated Survey Results
Question #1: Are you an adult City
resident or a non-resident property
owner?

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

the 740 responses to this
question, 672 (90.8%) were City
residents and 68 (9.2%) were nonresident property owners.
It is
apparent that this survey will
represent residents opinions to a
greater degree than non-resident
property owners, i.e. business
owners and landlords. This is to be
expected since there are more
residents than businesses.

Of

Question #2: To what age group do
you belong?

Of the 743 responses to this
question, 7 (0.9%) were between 19
and 24; 70 (9.4%) were between 25
and 34; 126 (17.0%) were between
35 and 44; 142 (19.1%) were
between 45 and 54; 142 (19.1%)
were between 55 and 64; and 256
(34.5%) were 65 and over.
The median age of the respondents is
56. 7 years of age. This is higher than
the City's median age of 37.2 years of
age, however, when those residents
under age 19 are removed, the City's
median age rises to 42.9 years - which is
still considerably lower than the median
age of the questionnaire respondents.
Factors contributing to this include:
1) many of the City's residents are retired
and tend to have more time to complete
a survey; 2) many older residents have
more at stake and have lived in
St. Joseph longer than many younger
residents; and 3) many of the City's
younger residents live with parents that
would have completed the survey.
Considering these points, we believe the
survey results to be valid but skewed to
older residents' opinions.

F-1

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Question #3: If a City resident, do you

own your home?
Of the 669 responses to this
question, 608 (90.9%) were
homeowners and 61 (9.1%) did not
own their home.
The 1990 Census lists 2,396 (57.0%) of
the City's 4,200 occupied units as being
owner-occupied - which indicates that a
higher proportion of homeowners are
represented in this survey. The reasons
for this imbalance are similar to the age
difference, 1) homeowners tend to have
more at stake than renters; 2) homeowners tend to have lived in an area
longer than non-homeowners; and 3)
homeowners tend to be older and have
more time to devote to community
betterment.
This anomaly does not
invalidate the survey, however, it only
means that the opinions tend to be
weighted towards the homeowner's
perspective of the City.
Question #4:

Please indicate which
category your total family income fell into
last year.
Of the 699 responses to this
question, 92 (13.2%) had incomes
below $14,999; 58 (8.3%) had
incomes between $15,000 and
$19,999; 49 (7.0%) had incomes
between $20,000 and $24,999; 49
(7.0%) had incomes between
$25,000 and $29,999; 49 (7.0%) had
incomes between $30,000 and
$34,999; 52 (7.4%) had incomes
between $35,000 and $39,999; 81
(11.6%) had incomes between
$40,000 and $49,999; 122 (17.5%)
had incomes between $50,000 and

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

$74,999; and 147 (21.0%) had
incomes greater than $75,000.
The median family income of the
respondents was $40,000. In 1989 the
median family income of St. Joseph was
$38,504 - which correlates very well to
the survey results.
Question #5:

Which of the following
residential types should be encourage as
future development?
#5(1) - Single -Family Residences Of the 750 responses, 575 (76.6%)
were in favor of the additional
development of single-family
dwellings.
#5(2) - Multi-Family (Apartments) Of the 750 responses, 114 (15.2%)
were in favor of the additional
development of multi-family housing
(apartments).
#5(3) - Duplex (Two-Family) - Of the
750 responses, 133 (17.7%) were in
favor of the additional development
of duplexes.
#5(4) - Condominiums, - Of the 750
responses, 175 (23.3%) were in
favor of the additional development
of condominiums.
#5(5) - Senior Congregate Housing Of the 750 responses, 265 (35.3%)
were in favor of the additional
development of senior congregate
housing.
#5(6) - Modular Homes - Of the 750
responses, 44 (5.9%) were in favor
of the development of modular
housing.
F-2

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

The only category where over 50 percent
of the respondents feel that further
housing development should occur is in
the additional development of singlefamily housing. However, a higher than
expected number supported congregate
housing.

Question #6 - Where do you shop and
the frequency?
#6(a) - Downtown St. Joseph - Of
the 700 responses, 638 (91.1%)
shop in downtown St. Joseph. Of
the 616 respondents that stated how
often they shopped in the downtown
area, 323 (41.7%) shopped four or
more times per month.
#6(b) - Other areas in St. Joseph Of the 671 responses, 638 (95.1 %)
shop in other areas of St. Joseph.
Of the 579 respondents that stated
how often they shopped in other
areas of St. Joseph, 423 (73.1%)
shopped four or more times per
month.
#6(c) - Niles Area - Of the 457
responses, 38 (8.3%) shop in the
Niles area. Of the 446 respondents
that stated how often they shopped
in Niles, 19 shopped four or more
times per month.
#6(d) - Benton Township - Of the
614 responses, 504 (82.1%) shop in
Benton Township.
Of the 543
respondents that stated how often
they shopped in Benton Township,
201 (37.0%) shopped four or more
times per month.
#6{e) - South Bend Area - Of the
567 responses, 357 (63.0%) shop in

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

the South Bend area. Of the 512
respondents that stated how often
they shopped in the South Bend
area, 30 (5.9%) shopped four or
more times per month.
#6{f) - Kalamazoo/Grand Rapids Of the 516 responses, 241 (46.7%)
shop in Kalamazoo/Grand Rapids.
Of the 487 respondents that stated
how often they shopped in the
Kalamazoo/Grand Rapids area, 15
(3.1%) shopped four or more times
per month.
#6(9) - South Haven - Of the 456
responses, 68 (14.9%) shop in South
Haven. Of the 441 respondents that
stated how often they shopped in
South Haven, 6 (1.4%) shopped four
or more times per month.

Question #7 - Are there specific
commercial businesses or professional
services which you feel are needed in
St. Joseph?
A list of the responses, in
descending order of responses
received, are listed below:
1.
2.
3.
4.

5.
6.
7.

8.
9.

10.
11.
12.
13.
14.

# of Responses
Department Store
19
Grocery
14
Discount Store
11
Recycling
11
Clothing
11
Additional/Improved
9
Medical Services
Mass Transportation
9
Tourism Related Activities
7
Sporting Goods
7
Hardware/Lumber
6
Womens Clothes
5
Shoes
4
Restaurant on Beach
4
General Retail
4

F-3

�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
# of Responses
General Restaurant
4
Mens Clothing
4
Additional Parking
4
Civic Center with conference
4
and banquet facilities
19. Mall/Outlet Mall
3
20. Fabric Store
3
21. Childrens Clothes
3

15.
16.
17.
18.

Two responses were received from
the following:
Taxi Service, Day Care, Olive Garden
Restaurant, Zoo, Stores should be
open later, Art Gallery, Computer
Store, Recreational Boating, Water
Park and Golf Course.
One response was received from the
following:
Business Services, Seafood
Restaurant, Harley Davidson Shop,
Candy Store, Steak &amp; Ale, Chi Chi's,
Show Biz Pizza, Bakery, Female
Physicians, Information Kiosk, Coffee
Shop, Auto Parts Store, Antiques,
Existing businesses should improve
level of services, upgrade Mall, Dry
Cleaning, Ethnic Restaurant, Food
Co-op, Public Pool, Music Store,
Boat Rental, Restaurant with live
music, Convenience Store, Sidewalk
Cates, Ice Skate sales/rental, Hobby
Shop, Buick Dealer, back door
access to shops, Dance Hall and Ice
Cream and Sandwiches.

Question #8 - How do you feel the older
manufacturing areas should be
redeveloped in the future?
#8(1) - Residential - Of the 750
responses, 193 (25.8%) feel that the

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

areas should be used for residential
purposes.
#8(2) - Commercial - Of the 750
responses, 289 (38.5%) feel that the
areas should be used for
commercial businesses.
#8(3) - Public - Of the 750
responses, 121 (16.1%) feel that the
areas should be used for public
uses.
#8(4) - Business/Industry - Of the
750 responses, 426 (56.8%) feel that
the areas should be used for
business and industry.

#8(5) - Recreation/Open Space - Of
the 750 responses, 299 (39.9%) feel
that the areas should be used for
recreation and open space.

Of the five types of land uses, Business
and Industry was chosen by more
residents as the favored way to
redevelop older manufacturing areas.

Question #9 - Is there a particular type
of recreational activity which you would
like to see developed in St. Joseph?
Of the 293 tabulated responses to
this question (others are included in
the comments section}, 73 of the
responses (24.9%) favored further
development of beach/water related
activities; 49 (16.7%) feel the City
needs to improve walking and biking
trails; and 44 (15.0%) feel that
additional recreational opportunities
are needed for young people.
Of the 293 responses, 18 (6.1%) felt
that additional indoor activities are
F-4

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

needed; 17 (5.8%) would like to see
ice skating developed further; 15
(5.1 %) would like to see passive
parks developetf further; 11 (3.8%)
would like to see more playgrounds
developed; 5 (1. 7%) would like to
see more team sports; and one
respondent feels more softball
facilities are needed.
Other
responses can be seen in the
comments section.
Question #1 O and #11 - See Planning
Questionnaire for the results.

The 1O categories under "current
condition/situation" which received the
most responses in the "good" rating
(highest rating) are:
1.
2.
3.

4.
5.
6.

7.
8.
9.
10.

Fire Protection Facilities
Police Facilities
Churches
Library Facilities
School Facilities
Livability of City
Snow Removal
Overall Appearance
Sidewalk Access
Downtown District

(591)
(574)
(562)
(561)
(547)
(536)
(529)
(515)
(506)

(480)

The 1O categories under "current
condition/situation" which received the
most responses in the "fair" rating (lowest
rating) are:
1.

2.
3.
4.
&amp;.
6.
7.

8.
9.
10.

Ausco Property Redevelopment
Bicycle Path Development
Tax Base
Tourism
Waterfront Areas
Recreational Facilities
Traffic Flow
YWCA
Family Orientation
Downtown District

(468)
(373)
(215)
(123)
(109)
(101)
(95)
(79)
(55)
(49)

The 1O categories under "future attention"
which received the most responses in the
"high" rating (high level of attention
should be devoted) are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Ausco Property Redevelopment
Livability of City
Waterfront Areas
Overall Appearance
Tax Base
School Facilities
Recreation Facilities
Housing Conditions
Downtown District
Tourism

(452)
(360)
(358)
(328)
(306)
(301)
(300)
(298)
(295)
(295)

The 1Ocategories under "future attention"
which received the most responses in the
"low" rating (low level of attention should
be devoted) are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Churches
Marinas
Bicycle Path Development
Library Facilities
Sidewalk Access
Mercy Memorial Med. Center
YWCA
Neighborhood Parks
Snow Removal
Police Facilities

(156)
(144)
(116)
(108)
(106)
(99)
(97)
(77)
(76)
(68)

It should be noted that while these
categories have been chosen for not
needing much . attention, all but one
category (churches) have more
responses in the "high" rating than in the
"low" rating.
Comments from Survey

In addition to the preceding survey
results, that can be numerically tabulated
and compared, the survey comments are
a compilation of residents feelings.
Comments tend to be more critical of the
City, since they are points that the

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-5

---------

�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
respondents feel need to be improved
upon. Fewer comments are received
that state a particular service or other
item is not in need of improvements.

12.

Due to the quantity of comments
received they have been placed into 33
groups. For a complete listing of the
comments, contact the City's Inspection
Department.

14.

The comments, listed in descending
order of responses are as follows:
# of
Responses

1.

2.

3.

Dissatisfaction with City
Services, Employees, School
System, City Commissioners
and Boards

47

16.

Problems with rental properties

11

17.

Improve downtown parking

11

18.

Improve shopping

10

19.

Do not increase tourism - pay
more attention to year-round
residents

10

20.

Move City Hall

10

21.

Limit waterfront development

10

24.

Increase citizen input

9

35

25.

Keep City Hall downtown

8

26.

Improve public relations

7

27.

Regulate pet owners

7

28.

Infrastructure improvements

7

29.

Improve vacant industrial sites

6

30.

Regulate billboards and
political signs

5

31.

Attract younger people

4

32.

Regulate ski jets and boats

4

33.

Increase/institute non-resident
fees

3

29

Improve sidewalks and paths
for pedestrians and bicycles

25

23

Improve marina (5) and
beaches (11)

16

Approve of bluff improvements
and activities

15

Dissatisfaction with waterfront development

12

41

Improve recreation and related
activities

11 .

Comments concerning
questionnaire

15.

9

6.

10.

12

Traffic problems

Like living in St. Joseph

-9.

Satisfied with City services,
Employees, School System,
City Commissioners and Boards

23.

5.

Maintain and improve residential
areas

13

9

Need more business, industry
jobs and tourism (9)

8.

Dissatisfaction with Mercy
Memorial Medical Center

13.

22. · Develop additional parking
44

7.

14

78

Dissatisfaction with development
and activities on Bluff

4.

0

Taxes and cost of housing
too much

Dissatisfaction with zoning
and various City ordinances

14

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-6

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
see what choices are preferred by
particular groups in St. Joseph, i.e.
homeowners, seniors, etc.

Cross-Tabulations

This section shows. the responses of
certain questions with those of others - to

Cross-Tabulation #1 - Age and Income (Questions #2 and #4)

age group, which earns a median family
income of $61,665 - considerably higher
than the overall median family income of
$38,504. The only age group (with
adequate responses to determine a
median income) that was below the
overall median income was the 65 and
over group. Residents 65 and over had
a median family income of $21,600.

When age and income are crosstabulated it becomes apparent that
certain age groups earn more money
than other groups. When the median
income of residents is compared by age
it can be seen that income rises as age
increases and then decreased as
residents reach retirement age. The
highest income age group is the 45-54
Income
Below $14,999

19-24
2

25-34

Age
45-54

35-44

55-64

65+
73

9
11

1

3

2
1

6

3
3

$20,000-$24,999

0
1

8

10

$25,000-$29,999

0

7

3
4

36
25

7

12

18

$30,000-$34,999

2

9

10

7

$35,000-$39,999
$40,000-$49,999

2

8
13

14

$15,000-$19,999

$50,000-$74,999

8

9
13
20

0

6
11

25

14

15
39
33
54
41
25
5
NA
$61,667
$42,500
$43,461
$56,089
Median Family Income for St. Joseph - $38,504;
1990 U.S. Census
0
0

$75,000+
Median

13
18
15
22
$21,600

Cross-Tabulation #2 - Age and Home Ownership (Questions #2 and #3)

Age also influences home ownership. As
people grow older, home ownership
percentages climb, to peak at 98.3
percent for residents between the ages

of 55 and 64 years of age.
The
percentage drops to 86.9 percent for
residents 65 and over.

Age
Homeowner
Non-Homeowner
% Homeowners

0

19-24

25-34

35-44

45-54

55-64

1

55

106

111

117

3

8

25.0

87.3

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

10
91.4

5

2

95.7

98.3

65+
212
32
86.9

F-7

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Cross-Tabulation #3 - Age and Residential Development (Questions #2 and #5)

This series of cross-tabulations shows
how residents in different age groups
responded to question #5 - which is
actually six separate questions (plus
comments) dealing with how people feel
about the development of different
residential types in St. Joseph. This is
important in order to understand if the
results vary between age groups especially since the survey was answered
by a large proportion of residents age 65
and over.

76. 7 percent of the respondents feel that
more single-family homes should be
developed. For residents 65 and over,
62.5 percent feel that single-family homes
should be developed. This figure is
higher for residents under the age of 65
(84.2%). The 25-34 age group has the
highest percentage of positive responses
with an 87.1 percent approval rate.
The second most popular form of future
residential development is senior
congregate housing. While the overall
figure is influenced by residents age 65
and over, it is also the second most
chosen form of residential development
for residents under the age of 65.
Overall, 35 percent of the respondents
favor the development of senior housing.

The cross-tabulation shows that the type
of residential development desired by
different age groups varies - slightly in
some categories and to a greater extent
in others. The most favored form of
future residential development is singlefamily housing. For the total population,

Age
Residential Development Categories

19-24

25-34

35-44

45-54

55-64

In favor of single-family residential
Not in favor of single-family residential
% in favor of single-family

2
5
28.6

61
9
87.1

108
18
85.7

118
24
83.1

121
21
85.2

160
62.5

410
570
173
77
84.2 76.7

In favor of multi-family residential
Not in favor of multi-family residential
% in favor of multi-family

2
5
28.6

13
57
18.6

16
109
12.8

15
127
10.6

27
115
19.0

38
218
14.8

73
111
413
631
15.0
15.0

0
7
0.0

9
61
12.9

11
114
8.8

30
112
21.1

27
115
19.0

53
203
20.7

77
130
612
409
15.8
17.5

2
5
28.6

18
52
25.7

27
98
21.6

54
88

35
221
13.7

140
346
28.8

175
567

38.0

39
103
27.5

0
7
0.0

18
52
25.7

23
102
18.4

59
83
41.5

55
87
38.7

105
151
41.0

155
331
31.9

260
482
35.0

5
65

9
116
7.2

6
136
4.2

7
135
4.9

13
243
5.0

28
458
5.8

41
701
5.5

In favor of duplexes
Not in favor of duplexes
% in favor of duplexes
In favor of condominiums
Not in favor of condominiums
% in favor of condominiums
In favor of senior congregate housing
Not in favor of senior congregate housing
% in favor of senior congregate housing
In favor of modular homes
Not in favor of modular homes
% in favor of modular homes

0

1
6
14.3

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

7.1

65+
96

Under 65 !Total

23.6

F-8

JI

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

For residents 65 and over, 41 percent
are in favor of developing additional
senior housing - for residents under the
age of 65 the figure is 31 .9 percent. The
45-54 age group has the highest
percentage of favorable responses
(41.5%).

The third most chosen response is for
the development of condominiums.
Nearly 24 percent of the survey's
respondents favor this type of
development.
Age does seem to
influence peoples' opinions when it
comes to the development of
condominiums. For residents under 65,
28.8 percent favor their development - for
residents 65 years of age and over the
figure is 13. 7 percent.
Although duplexes are similar to singlefamily housing (the most popular
response), only 17.5 percent of the
survey's respondents feel that more
duplexes should be developed in
St. Joseph. People 65 years of age and
over are more in favor of their
development than people under the age
of 65.

development of modular housing, with
5.0 percent 65 years of age and older
and 5.8 percent under 65 years of age
favoring modular housing.
Again, the cross-tabulations show that
age does influence peoples' responses
to a certain extent - but the residents of
St. Joseph tend to favor the same types
of residential development regardless of
age.
''Traditional" types of housing - singlefamily housing - is the overall favorite in
St. Joseph. Modular housing (which can
be manufactured to be virtually
undetectable from traditional single-family
housing) is the least favored form of
residential development. Senior housing
is a popular form of housing
development - and was chosen by a
variety of age groups. Condominiums,
duplexes and multiple-family housing are
all forms of housing that some residents
feel are needed in St. Joseph - but not
the majority.

The development of multiple-family
housing is the fifth most favored form of
residential development. Age does not
seem to influence the responses.
Overall, 15.0 percent of the respondents
favor the development of multiple-family
housing with 15 percent under 65 years
of age and 14.8 percent 65 years of age
and over favoring this development.
The least favored form of residential
development in St. Joseph is modular
housing. Again, age does not seem to
influence the results. Overall 5.5 percent
of the respondents favor the

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-9

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Cross-Tabulation #4 - Age and Development of Manufacturing Sites (Questions #2
and #8)

This series of cross-tabulations shows
how residents in different age groups
responded to question #8 - which is
actually five separate questions dealing
with how people feel older industrial sites
should be developed.
This is an
important tabulation since a disproportionate larger number of residents 65
years of age and over returned the
survey.

Of those residents under 65 years of

age, 55.3 percent are in favor of
redeveloping industry.
Of those
residents 65 and over, 59.8 percent are
in favor of redeveloping industry.
Favorable responses for this category
are lower in the younger age groups and
increase steadily - reaching a peak of 69
percent approval at the 55-64 age group
- before decreasing for the 65 and over
group.

The cross-tabulation shows the type of
development that the different age
groups desire in older manufacturing
sites varies slightly in some categories,
and to a greater degree in other
categories. The most favored use for
redeveloping older industrial sites is
business/industry. Nearly 57 percent of
the respondents feel that business and
industry should be redeveloped on the
older sites.

The second most favored type of development that residents chose for the older
industrial sites is recreation/open space.
Over 40 percent of the respondents feel
that the sites should be redeveloped to
serve the recreational needs of the area.
The differences based on the responses
of each age group are more pronounced
for this category.

Age
Development Categories
In favor of residential
Not in favor of residential
% In favor of resident
In favor of commercial
Not in favor of commercial
% In favor of commercial
In favor of public uses
Not in favor of public uses
% In favor of public uses
In favor of manufacturing
Not in favor of manufacturing
% in favor of manufacturing
In favor of recreation/open space
Not in favor of recreation/open space
% in favor of recreation/open space

0

19-24

25-34

35-44

2
5

24
46

42
84

34.3

33.3

24.1

19.1

29
41

57
69

59
82

55
87

41.4

45.2

41.8

38.7

28.6
2
5

28.6
2
5

28.6
2
5

28.6
1
6

14.3

25
45

22
104

45-54

55-64

65+

Under 65

34
107

27
114

63
193

129
356

31
110

21
121

35.7

17.5

22.0

14.8

33
37

73
68

98
44

47.1

63
63
50.0

51.8

69.0

41
29

66
60

64
77

57
85

58.6

52.4

45.4

40.1

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

24.6
84
172

32.8
20
238

7.8
153
103

59.8
69
187

27.0

26.6
202
284

41.6
101
382

20.9
269
217

55.3
229
257

47.1

F-10

Total
192
549

25.9
286
456

38.5
121
618

16.4
422
320

56.9
298
444

40.2

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Over 47 percent of residents under 65
years of age favor changing older
industrial sites to recreational open
space. Only 27 percent of residents over
the age of 65 favor using the land for
recreation. The 25-34 age group had the
largest percentage of respondents
favoring the development of recreational
areas.
Redeveloping the areas for commercial
uses was the third most chosen option
with 38.5 percent of the respondents
favoring commercial development. Of
the residents 65 and over, 32.8 percent
of the respondents favor the
redevelopment of the sites into
commercial uses. For residents under
65 years of age, the favorable response
equal 41.6 percent of the responses.
The age group with the highest
percentage of favorable responses is the
35-44 age group.

65 year of age, 20.9 percent favor
developing the older industrial sites for
public uses.
While the cross-tabulations show that
different age groups favor different types
of development to different degrees - it
shows that they essentially agree that
business/industry should remain, or be
redeveloped, in the older manufacturing
sites.

Redeveloping the City's older industrial
sites for residential purposes is the
second least chosen category - this
api:-Jies for residents 65 and over as well
as residents under 65 years of age. For
residents 65 of age and over, 24.6
percent of the responses are in favor of
developing the areas for residential uses
- this figure is 26.6 percent for residents
under 65 years of age. The age group
which chose this response the most was
the 25-34 age group - which is the age
when families generally are in the market
for their first home.
The least favored category - for both the
under 65 age group and the 65 and over
age group - is public uses. Only 7.8
percent of the responses from those 65
and over are in favor of developing the
sites for public uses. For those under

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-11

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Cross-Tabulation
and #5)

#5 - Homeownership &amp; Housing Development (Questions #3

Homeowners and non-homeowners differ
on the types of housing that should be
developed. Homeowners are more in
favor of the development of single-family
housing and non-homeowners are more

in favor of multi-family housing - which is
not unusual since each group favors the
further development of housing similar to
what they live in.

Homeowner Non-Homeowner
Encourage single-family development

491

28

Do not encourage single-family development

117

33

74

23

533

38

99

12

Do not encourage duplex development

508

49

Encourage condominium development

129

15

Do not encourage condominium development

478

46

Encourage the development of senior housing

203

28

Do not encourage the development of senior housing

404

33

32

8

575

53

Encourage multi-family development
Do not encourage multi-family development
Encourage duplex development

Encourage the development of modular housing
Do not encourage the development of modular housing

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-12

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Cross-Tabulation #6 - Age and Shopping Habits (Questions #2 and #6

While age does influence where people
shop to some degree, the influence is
not significant.
Age

55-64

65+

128

121

206

8

10

15

19

64

111

126

121

205

1

2

10

2

8

10

Shop In Niles area

0

2

5

8

5

18

Do not shop In Niles area

6

43

80

97

87

102

Shop in Benton Township

6

51

95

90

104

152

Do not shop in Benton Township

0

11

18

30

20

31

Shop in South Bend

5

42

69

88

73

75

Do not shop in South Bend

2

15

34

37

40

81

Shop in Kalamazoo and Grand Rapids

5

31

44

55

50

53

Do not shop in Kalamazoo and Grand Rapids

2

21

53

62

52

82

Shop in South Haven

1

6

10

10

17

24

Do not shop in South Haven

5

41

74

93

71

100

19-24

25-34

35-44

Shop in downtown St. Joseph

4

61

113

Do not shop in downtown St. Joseph

2

8

Shop in other areas of St. Joseph

5

Do not shop In other areas of St. Joseph

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

45-54

F-13

�PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Cross-Tabylatlon #7 - Homeownershlg and Redevelogm ent of Older Manufacturing
Sites (Questions #3 and #8)

The only area where homeowners and
non-homeowners seem to differ on
opinion is in the area relating to the
development of business and industry.

Morehomeowners favor the development
of business and industry and most nonhomeowners are opposed to the
development of business and industry.
Homeowner Non-Homeowner

Favor residential development

165

16

Do not favor residential development

441

45

Favor commercial development

244

14

Do not favor commercial development

363

47

99

11

Do not favor public development

508

50

Favor business/industry development

355

26

Do not favor business/industry development

252

35

Favor recreation/open space

254

22

Do not favor recreation/open space

353

39

Favor public development

I

;I

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-14

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

St. Joseph Planning Questionaire
Raw Figures
1.

Are you an adult City resident? (a) 672 or/non-resident property owner? (b) 68

2.

To what age group do you belong?

(1) .L_19-24

(2) -1Q_25-34

(3) _jg§_35-44

(4) _jg_45-54

(5} __HL55-64 {6} 256 65 and Over

3.

If a City resident, do you own your home? (1) 608 Yes

4.

Please indicate which category your total family income fell into last year.

(1) 92 Below $14,999
(2) 58 $15,000-$19,999
(3) 49 $20,000-$24,999
5.

(4) 49 $25,000-$29,999
(5) 49 $30,000-$34,999
(6) 52 $35,000-$39,999

(2) _§g_No

(7) ~$40.000-$49,999
(8) 122 $50,000-$74,999
(9) 147 $75,000 Above

Which of the following residential types should be encouraged as future development? (Please indicate all
desired types)

6.

(1) .filg_Single-Family Residences

(5) 265 Senior Congregate Housing

(2) 114 Multi-Family (Apartments)
(3) 133 Duplex (Two-Family)
(4} 175 Condominiums

(6) 44 Modular Homes
(Prefabricated Single-Family)
(6) ,JJLOther (Please Explain): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Where do you shop and the frequency?
# Times/Month*

62 No
(b) 638 Yes 33 No
(c) 38 Yes 419 No
(d) 504 Yes 11 0 No

(a) 638 Yes

Downtown St. Joseph
Other Areas in St. Joseph
Niles Area
Benton Township

# Times/Month*

323 (e) 357 Yes
423 (f} 241 Yes
...m (g) 68 Yes

w

11.Q No South Bend Area

30

275 No Kalamazoo/Grand Rapids .1§
388 No South Haven
_§
(h) Other Areas 19

*Over 4 times per month
7.

Are there specific commercial businesses or professional services which you feel are needed in St. Joseph?

8.

How do you feel the older manufacturing areas should be redeveloped in the future? (Answer all appropriate)

(1) 193 Residential
(2) 289 Commercial

0

(3) .!ll_Public

(5) 299 Recreation/Open Space

(4) 426 Business/Industry

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-15

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
9.

Is there a particular type of recreational activity which you would like to see developed in St. Joseph?

ISSUE IDENTIFICATION:
1O. and 11 .

Indicate your impressions of the following facilities/services/areas and what level of attention they
need to make St. Joseph a better community in the future?
10. Current Condition/Situation
Good

Average

11. Future Attention

Fair

High

Average

Low

Housing Conditions

452

216

28

298

224

43

Library Facilities

561

132

18

149

252

108

Recreational Facilities

331

251

101

300

219

45

66

160

373

238

193

116

School Facilities

547

126

13

301

192

65

Fire Protection Facilities

591

101

13

288

259

61

Police Facilities

574

110

21

254

230

68

irraffic Flow

343

265

95

246

261

50

Sidewalk Access

506

160

30

129

312

106

Neighborhood Parks

455

207

42

179

301

77

Snow Removal

529

139

38

186

288

76

Downtown District

480

175

49

295

209

56

Mercy Memorial Med. Center

420

171

109

246

213

99

55

87

468

452

90

30

Tourism

261

299

123

295

224

49

Family Orientation

325

259

55

225

245

54

rYWCA

353

231

79

160

267

97

Churches

562

112

15

121

261

156

Waterfront Areas

374

214

109

358

159

51

Marinas

474

160

38

152

235

144

Livability of City

536

125

32

360

156

41

Tax Base

180

241

215

306

184

52

Semi-Public Uses

224

289

47

93

323

44

Overall Appearance

515

114

14

328

165

27

4

5

10

6

0

4

Bicycle Path Development

Ausco Property Redevelopment

Other

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-16

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

St. Joseph Key Person Survey Results
Trends

A survey was distributed to Planning
Commission members, City Commission
members and other people that have an
interest in the planning process. Surveys
were mailed to people that attended the
initial meeting. City Commission and
Planning Commission members were
interviewed in person - or mailed a
survey if they could not attend the
interviews.
This survey was distributed for the
purpose of soliciting ideas about
St. Joseph's present trends and the
City's future. The results of this survey
are not meant to be a numerical
comparison of results, but are meant to
show what kinds of ideas people have

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

0

about St. Joseph.
By having open
ended questions, unlike the community
survey, a variety of responses were
given. This variety of responses gave
the Planning Commission additional
information to use to see if the Plan was
going in the right direction. It also
showed that everybody has different
priorities.
While many of the following responses
are based on facts, it should be
remembered that for the most part the
responses are opinions of people - which
is what this section was designed to
determine. Quantities of responses have
not been included in this section since it
was felt that it was more important to
view the variety of opinions -instead of
the quantity.

Increase in service jobs
Downtown well-maintained
Active Citizens
Growth in Marinas
Increasing attendance at public events
Condominium development
Well-maintained properties
Progressive community
Influx of stores (not downtown)
Cultural
Influx of physicians
Expansion of MMMC
Tourism
Increase in upscale housing
Younger City Commission
Growing awareness of St. Joseph's uniqueness
Increased support from businesses

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-17

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Loss of industry and manufacturing jobs
Increasing property taxes
Decreasing tax base
Increased isolation between St. Joseph and surrounding areas
Declining population/slow growth
Conservative
Declining credibility due to association with Benton Harbor
Apathy /lack of drive
Inability to attract young people
Higher salaries out of St. Joseph
Negative attitudes
City tries to influence peoples decisions
Unwilling to work with developers
Resentment towards Cornerstone
Poor public relations
Lack of promotion
Negative impact of surrounding shopping areas in downtown

•
•
•
•
•

Aging population
Increasing tourism
More liberal thinking
Increasing number of young, high income couples/families
Need to improve public input process

Analysis
The first thing people will notice in this list
is that they might not agree with all of the
responses - some people might feel that
a trend is positive and another may feel
that it is negative. The benefit of this is
that it gives people something to think
about - that maybe there is something
positive in every trend, or that not every

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

positive trend is without its faults. Other
trends are more neutral.
The City can ·benefit by working to
emphasis the positive trends and reverse
or minimize the negative trends. Care
should be extended to ensure that one
does not cancel out the other - and care
should be used to determine if the
opinions are actually true.

F-18

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Opportunities and Problems

0

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

The waterlront
Health Care/MMMC
AUSCO site and other vacant areas
Lions Park
County development of Silver Beach
Work with surrounding communities
Tourism
Existing character of City
Bluff
Cultural development
Growth opportunities
Acquire Whirlpool field and connect to existing CBD

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

AUSCO site
Lack of space for growth
Lack of vision/change
Two separate commercial areas
Proposal C, or other limits on property taxes
Cost of implementing ADA
Loss of Silver Beach
Ship canal
Lack of public transportation
Appearance of many Main Street businesses
Conservative administration
High cost of housing
Too much waterlront development
Commercial sprawl
No schools centrally located
Whirlpool may not always be in St. Joseph
Image of racial problems/inequities
Traffic
Residents not convinced change is needed
High level of rental properties
Parking
Lack of restaurants downtown

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

F-19

�~
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Comments
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Need to attract industries/jobs
Improve airport
City Hall - relocate/renovate
Need more businesses downtown
Maintain/improve harbor/marina
Senior services needed
Senior housing needed
Convert box factory
Continue to upgrade infrastructure
Need person(s) in charge of promotion
Market St. Joseph as an area for large Chicago businesses to locate
"satellite" businesses
Curbside recycling
Need to work with developers to ensure successful projects
Schools need more teachers and rooms
Consolidate small residential lots to create new areas for upscale homes
Analysis

such as what opportunities does the
AUSCO site offer. The same should be

Opportunities and problems also divide
many people - it is more apparent here
since some people chose certain points
as opportunities while others chose them
as problems. Some of these include the
AUSCO site, Silver Beach and growth
opportunities.
Many of the listed
opportunities are obvious, such as the
waterfront, but many listed opportunities
need to be debated and expanded upon
to determine what the opportunities are -

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSNE PLAN

done with the list of problems.
Additionally, problems should be
matched up with opportunities.
An
example of this is the problem relating to
the lack of space for growth - this can be
matched -with the AUSCO site as an
opportunity. Many other problems and
opportunities can be matched with each
other - which is one of the useful points
of this Section.

F-20

~

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Leadership

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

City administration/staff
City Commission
Businesses
Lending institutions
Whirlpool
Planning Commission
St. Joseph Improvement Association
Cornerstone Alliance
County officials
City Service Clubs
St. Joseph Today
Philanthropists

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

City administration/staff
City Commission
Cornerstone Alliance
St. Joseph Today
Non-forward looking people
Long-time residents
Retail business that treat customers poorly
School Board
Planning Commission (compatibility of land us~s versus development
dollars)
LECO
Whirlpool

•
•
•
•
•

Need inspections of new and renovated buildings
Need more optimistic outlook
Need more leaders
Need greater variety of citizen input
City Manager needs assistant
Analysis

The City Staff and City Commission are
the most influential people in St. Joseph some people perceive what they do as
negative and others feel their work is

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

positive - either way they seem to have
the most control over the direction the
City will go in the future. Many leaders
are perceived as both positive and
negative influences in St. Joseph.

F-21

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Master Plan

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Blueprint/Vision/Guide for the future
Realistic/implementable plan
Reference point
Identify trends
Inform citizens and gain information from citizens
Promotional tool
Identify a limited number of goals
"Outsiders" view of St. Joseph
Identify historic aspects of St. Joseph
Identify opportunities
Identify future land use
Tie with ongoing Strategic Plan
Encourage good neighborhoods and services
Encourage new businesses
Stabilize local economy
More active community
Greater tax base
More visitors
More industry

Analysis

People feel the plan should act as a
flexible guide for the City's future

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

development.
All responses were
positive, or neutral, which indicates that
people feel the Plan is a necessary part
of the City's future.

F-22

�EXISTING LAND USE

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING LAND USE
Introduction

For a community to plan for its future it is
essential to analyze the existing land
uses, and in order to analyze the existing
land uses it is necessary to perform an
inventory of the area's land uses. This
allows for the relationships of various
land uses to be identified and measured.
The inventory of St. Joseph's land uses
was accomplished by updating the
inventory of past plans with field checks.
The inventory was then recorded on a
computer based map to allow for the
calculation of acreages and ease of
changes on clear readable maps.
Land Use Classifications

In order to compare the existing land
uses with the 1976 land use map, the
same land use classifications are being
used in this Plan. These land use
categories minimize confusion between
the maps, and show the changes of land
uses which have occurred throughout the
City.
Residential - This category indicates an

area in which dwellings with their
accessory buildings occupy the major
portion of the land. This i clude_s singlefamily housing, daplexes and multiRle~r:nily Eiousiog.
Commercial- The commercial category

includes areas, with or without structures,
wh_d
~~-----onal
business s
~~-- This
i
and
services to local residents and
consumers attracted from outside the
community. The two commercial districts
in St. Joseph, as well as retail, wholesale
and office space are included in this

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

category. Ware ousing ancl storage are
also included unless the storage space is
more closely related to another land use
- such as industrial.
Industrial - This category incudes areas
where raw or unfinished materials or
commodities are used to produce a
product. Tnis inclua_es heavy industry, or
im:f ustr1e
hose manufacturing process
causes various emissions (fumes, odors,
smoke, noise, light or vibrations) that can
be detrimental to surrounding land uses.
Also included is light in ustnal uses
whicfi ao not influence surrounding land
uses in the manners of heavy industry.
War-ehuusing ana s- r.ag_e are included in
t -is ca egor_y Lf the warehousing and
storage space is an integral part of the
manufacturing process.
Public/Quasi Public - Public and quasi-

public land uses include land areas and
facilities that are available to all of the
people within a particular service area, or
are used to provide services to the
people. These uses include schools,
libraries, cemeteries, government
buildings, public utilities, recreation and
open space and
museums.
Also
included in this category are areas and
buildings which are used by a limited
number of persons with particular
interests and nonprofit groups. These
include such uses as places of worship,
clubs and other activities.
This category is
comprised of all dedicated surface rightsof-way including streets, highways and
railroads, which are used for the
movement of people and goods.

Transportation

-

G-1

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING LAND USE

community. Establishing an accurate
inventory of land uses is important since
future land use distribution will largely be
shaped by existing patterns. There are
other factors that influence future land
use patterns, but the existing distribution
of land uses is the major factor which
influences the future land use distribution.
This is particularly true for a mature City
such as St. Joseph. The existing land
use inventory for St. Joseph has been
put on the base map to form an Existing
Land Use Map (G-1). The acreage
figures listed in Table G-1 have been
derived from this. The City's existing
land use analysis is presented by
category, and the various planning areas
within St. Joseph.

Redevelopment - This is a new category
which was not included in the previous
Comprehensive Plan. This area of the
City, north of the St. Joseph River, is an
area that is mostly older industrial uses
that are either in need of modernization
or conversion to another land use.
Vacant Land - This category includes
land not used for any purpose previously
listed, and is not developed.
Existing Land Use Inventory/Analysis

The inventory of existing land uses is an
important part of determining the future
distribution of land uses in and around a

TABLE G-1
CITY OF ST. JOSEPH EXISTING LAND USE ACREAGES

Land Use ·

,,..

Arii es ·;

-·-·-·

%of Landh~a

Residential

889.7

40.8

Commercial

112.6

5.2

Public

347.1

15.9

Industrial

109.0

5.0

Redevelopment

152.4

7.0

Vacant

199.6

9.1

Transportation (Streets)

289.5

13.3

82.4

3.8

Land Area

2,182.3

100.0

Total Area (includes Rivers)

2,369.2

--

Transportation (Rail)

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc., 1992.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

G-2

�\_./.,-1/" /&lt;.. / I (

ct'

\

~
~0

~~

A

LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL

=

I

COMMERCIAL

~
1m1mm1mi
... :,,......1

INDUSTRIAL

()

~

PUBLIC/QUASI PUBLIC

~

REDEVELOPMENT

I

VACANT

I

$

/M4~~. .~ V /i::

~1' Jlff6,..ltftllJjpJ
. l;/IJ

'-~,:;:lf!I
l:::::::r -".,..,. .• .•···
a?==:ri-lIDbcrnl

~

•::~:..: .:~~:

■1f I:: : :~: ·
Ifl1·iii

1
~

'"

cfil@~CTI
~c

{Iii
~
l~~1m1,
.IiHi"I I

::::i

···· ·

'
""lii!!iiiiilili ![![,
.&gt;i"™'!lfcW~,,;q,,,,11,,.,...... ... .

.,, :;:~·

~~rn~·-

:l.
_ : . .l . :. i l
• i..•: i J•

~~I
"' I
~

1[!i

~

□~

~

~

..:r

V

:ii

-'

1111

- ~

MAP u·
SCALE

~

o·

~._

Cl
I

soo· 1ooo·

1500·

2500'

SAINT JOSEPH,
MICHIGAN

_______________..._______________________________________
GOVE AS SOCIATES INC.

EXISTING LAND
USE MAP

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING LAND USE
Residential - The total amount of land

devoted to residential uses in St. Joseph
is 889. 7 acres, or 40.8 percent of the
City's land area. Residential land uses
are by far the most predominant land use
in the City. The majority of residential
land uses are distributed throughout the
City of St. Joseph, south and west of the
river. North of the St. Joseph River
residential uses are limited to the area
near Lake Michigan, along Ridgeway and
Marina drives. A limited amount of
residential development is located on
Marina Island.
Commercial - The total amount of land

devoted to commercial uses in
St. Joseph is 112.6 acres, or 5.2 percent
of the City's land area. Two main
commercial districts exist in the City. The
Business District located just south of the
St. Joseph River serves as the City's
Central Business District since City and
County offices, and many other public
buildings and private businesses are
located in this area. Much of this main
commercial district has extensive
streetscaping to provide a festive
atmosphere for shoppers and visitors.
The Central Business District is oriented
to accommodate pedestrian traffic, and is
interactive with the lakefront parks. The
southern commercial district, located
along Niles Avenue in the southern
portion of the City, contains many retail
and service shops but does not have any
of the major public offices or facilities that
exist in the Central Business District.
Other major differences between the two
districts include the fact that the southern
business district is more oriented towards
the automobile, and it is not as oriented
towards attracting outside visitors as the
Central Business District. In addition to
the two commercial districts there are

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

several smaller commercial uses
throughout the City. One commercial
area exists on Marina Island and no
major commercial uses are located north
of the river.
Public - Public land in St. Joseph
accounts for 347.1 acres of land, or 15.9
percent of the City's land. This is the
third largest land use category - following
residential and transportation. Public and
quasi-public land uses are located
throughout the City.
Industrial - Industrial land uses in
St. Joseph account for 109.0 acres, or
5.0 percent of the community's land
area. When land in the redevelopment
category is not counted as an industrial
land use, the industrial land use category
is the smallest category in the City. The
major industrial areas are located north
of the St. Joseph River, on Marina Island
and in the southern portion of the City.
Redevelopment - This land use is

confined to one area of the City, north of
the river. The area covers 152.4 acres
and accounts for 7.0 percent of the City's
land. The area mainly consists of older
manufacturing sites, which are proposed
for redevelopment.
Vacant - St. Joseph has 199.6 acres of
vacant land, or 9.1 percent of the City's
land area. Some of this land is located
near the St. Joseph River and on Marina
Island and is within the 100-year
floodplain.
Other vacant land exists
along Lake Michigan in environmentally
sensitive areas.
In the southern
panhandle portion of the City there are
several areas of undeveloped land
located between residential and industrial
land uses.

G-4

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING LAND USE
Transportation - Rights-of-way for
streets and railroads account for 371.9
acres, or 17.0 percent of the City's land
area - the second largest land use in
St. Joseph. Of the 371.9 acres, 289.5
are street rights-of-way and the remaining
82.4 acres are railroad rights-of-way.
Existing Land Use Inventory/
Analysis: Planning Areas

In addition to studying the City of
St. Joseph as a whole, this Plan
examines five distinct planning areas of
St. Joseph.
Map G-2 shows the
boundaries of the five areas. These
areas are based on Census tracts except
for Areas #1, #2 and #3, which are all in
one Census tract. These three areas
have been identified since they are
separated by a geographic feature (the
river).
Planning Area #1 - Planning Area #1 ,
located north of the St. Joseph River
contains 353.3 acres. This is the second
smallest of the five planning areas, and
accounts for 16.2 percent of the City's
land area. The largest land use in the
planning area is the redevelopment
category which covers 152.4 acres, or
43.1 percent of the area's land. The
relationship between the various land
uses is illustrated on Table G-2. The
redevelopment area is crisscrossed with
highways and railroad tracks and is
composed of old manufacturing sites and
vacant land - much of the redevelopment
site is in the 100-year floodplain . The
second largest land use in Area # 1 is
residential which accounts for 91.4 acres
of land, or 25.9 percent of the area's
land. The residential land uses are
concentrated in the western portion of
the area, near Lake Michigan. Land

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

used for streets account for 39.6 acres,
or 11.2 percent of the area's land.
Business 1-94/US-33 is a major arterial
that passes through the area. Upton
Drive is the only collector street and all
other streets are considered local streets.
Railroad rights-of-way cover 27.1 acres,
or 7.7 percent of the area's land. Public
land in Planning Area #1 covers 32.9
acres, or 9.3 percent of the land. The
public land is located where the
St. Joseph River meets Lake Michigan
and consists of Tiscornia Park, the U.S.
Coast Guard Station, the Army Reserve
Armory and the North Pier. There are no
commercial land uses in Planning Area
#1 and the only vacant land is contained
within the redevelopment area.
Planning Area #2 - This Planning Area
consists of Marina Island, between the
St. Joseph River and the Morrison
Channel. The 134.0 acre island is the
smallest of the five planning areas and
accounts for 6.1 percent of the City's
total land area. The largest land use on
the island is vacant land - this is due to
the fact that much of the island is in the
100-year floodplain. The second largest
land use on the island is industrial, which
accounts for 35.9 acres or 26.8 percent
of the island's land.
Public land in
Planning Area #2 covers 25.0 acres of
land, or 18. 7 percent of the island, and
consists of the City's wastewater
treatment facilities, a boat launch facility
and a new parking lot. The streets on
the island are all local and cover 10.2
acres of land. There are 6. 7 acres of
commercial land on Marina Island.
Planning Area #3 - This is the largest of
the five planning areas. The planning
area is located in the main portion of
St. Joseph, north of the ravine. The area

G-5

�~$ /- •

1......./_/_/

/l.. ''(

\

'::,...c.y

~

~(.)

i-~

'V

.~
&lt;'

ff ,~
(J

~

N~
i~N-

/QNQ

i'V/o/~f

lZ~a{
~~p0o
,b((t

~

s

/4

1~ 9.9
_9J

~ · ..

~LA

,~-~

II

ll.l..EML_JLI__VE

--:; ~ /A'-£
IMADJSONaj, ...VE
,----,

/,

~

~l ~I

t;

~~~

~n~
M

~3?~EJG
c·- #'!"~GQD
I

.,, ,L.. A ...... 1m ~
COU/MBI"

A

~

:&lt;In : . ~~c
~
7/~.. IEJ _ ,. ·
~ ~ MlDYrf Lu_J

,!M ~"VE

j---jHij-···~.. ''7 '
~I

-

~..,,. • ::=!._~
~

MAP G-2
SCALE

o·IY'c•
500·

1000· 1500·

I
2soo·

SAINT JOSEPH,
MICHIGAN

GOVE ASSOCIATES INC. .._____________
PLANNING AREAS
°' _________________________________
___

0

�.,
0

TABLE G-2

§

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION FOR THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH

~

en

;i

.....
0

!

;
(')

-

Il l

Resldentlal

91.4

I

25.9

0.0

0.0

364.7

45.5

241.8

58.0

191.8

39.7

z

Commercial

o.o

I

0.0

6.7

5.0

44.3

5.5

27.9

6.8

33.7

7.0

112.6

5.2

~

Public

32.9

9.3

25.0

18.7

201.1

25.1

46.0

11.2

42.1

8.7

347.1

15.9

9.9

2.8

35.9

26.8

6.2

0.8

2.5

0.6

54.5

11.3

109.0

5.0

152.4

43.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

152.4

7.0

0.0

0.0

56.2

41.9

24.2

3.0

20.5

5.0

98.7

20.4

199.6

9.1

Transportation (Streets)

39.6

11.2

10.2

7.6

124.5

15.5

58.2

14.2

57.1

11.8

289.5

13.3

Transportation (Rall)

27.1

7.7

0.0

0.0

36.5

4.6

13.5

3.3

5.3

1.1

82.4

3.8

Land Area

353.3

100.0

134.0

100.0

801.5

100.0

410.3

100.0

483.2

100.0

2,182.3

100.0

Total Area (Includes water)

408.1

--

195.3

--

817.9

---

464.7

-

2,369.2

en

~

Industrial
Redevelopment
Vacant

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

C)

.!.)

-

483.2

889.7

40.8

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING LAND USE

covers 801.5 acres, or 36. 7 percent of
the City's land. The area is essentially a
mixture of residential areas, a large
commercial district and several public
areas. Residential uses cover 364. 7
acres, or 45.5 percent of the area's land.
The residential uses are distributed
throughout the entire area. Public or
quasi-public land in this area covers
201.1 acres, or 25.1 percent of the land.
Some public land is located along Lake
Michigan's shoreline, in the Central
Business District, at two cemeteries and
at the high school and stadium.
Transportation is the third largest land
use category in Planning Area #3.
Streets cover 124.5 acres of land, or 15.5
percent of the land. No other area has
as high of a percentage of streets as
Planning Area #3. The major arterial
streets in the area include Main Street,
Port Street, Ship Street, Wayne Street,
Niles Avenue and Lake Shore Drive. The
minor arterial streets include Lake
Boulevard, Cleveland Avenue, Lake View
Avenue and Broad Street. Collector
streets include Wallace Avenue, Kingsley
Avenue, Wolcott Avenue, Lake Street and
Vine Street. The remaining streets are all
considered to be local streets. Railroad
rights-of-way cover 36.5 acres of land, or
4.6 percent of the planning area. There
are 44.3 acres of commercial land, or 5.5
percent of the land. No other planning
area contains as much commercial land.
The majority of the commercial land is
located in or around the City's Central
Business District.
Some smaller
commercial areas are located throughout
the area. Vacant land in the planning
area covers 24.2 acres or 3.0 percent of
the land. Most of the vacant areas are
located adjacent to Lake Michigan, but
others exist throughout Planning Area
#3. There are 6.2 acres of industrial

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

land in the area - these uses are located
adjacent to the Morrison Channel.
Planning District #4 - Planning Area #4,
located on the east side of St. Joseph
adjacent to the St. Joseph River, is the
third largest of the five planning areas. It
contains 241.8 acres of residential land
uses, or 58.9 percent of the area's total
land. Of the five planning areas none
has a higher percentage of residential
land. The residential uses are located
throughout the area. The second largest
land use is transportation which covers
71.6 acres, or 17.5 percent land.
Railroad rights-of-way account for 13.5
acres of the transportation land uses,
and streets account for 58.2 acres. The
main arterial streets are Whittlesey
Avenue and Napier Avenue. The one
minor arterial street is Langley Avenue
and the only collector street is Wolcott
Avenue. All of the remaining streets are
considered local. Public land covers 46.0
acres of land. Much of the public/quasipublic land is located at the Mercy
Memorial Medical Center, near the
St. Joseph River. Lincoln School and
park space are two other public uses.
The fourth largest land use in the
planning area is commercial.
The
majority of these land uses are located
along Niles Avenue, in the City's
southern business district. The area has
20.5 acres of vacant land and 2.5 acres
of industrial land.
Planning Area #5 - This area, which is
located in the southern portion of the
City, covers 483.2 acres of land, or 22.1
percent of the City's land. The planning
area, which is the second largest of the
five areas, is the only area that does not
have direct river access. There are 191.8
acres of residential land uses in the area,
G-8

I
l
l

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-~
~

-~

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING LAND USE

or 39.7 percent of the area. The second
largest land use is the vacant category,
with most of the vacant land being
located in the southern panhandle of the
City. Transportation, at 71.6 acres, is the
third largest land use category. The only
major arterial street in the area is Lake
Shore Drive.
Minor arterial streets
include Hilltop Road, Cleveland Avenue
and Lake View Avenue.
Hawthorne
Avenue is the only collector street and all
other streets are considered local streets.
Streets account for 57. 1 acres and
railroad rights-of-way account for 5.3
acres. Industrial land uses in the area
cover 54.5 acres of land, or 11.3 percent
of the planning area's land. The area
has the smallest percentage of public
land of any of the five areas - 42.1 acres,
or 8. 7 percent. The majority of public
land is located along Lake Michigan.
There are 33. 7 acres of commercial land
which account for 7.0 percent of the
area's land. Most commercial uses are
located near Niles Avenue, but other
commercial areas are located throughout
the planning area.
Potential Areas of Conflict

The current distribution of land uses in
St. Joseph have several areas where a
combination of land uses can adversely
influence each other or surrounding land
uses, or can lead to conflicts in the future
if existing trends continue. The following
list are potential areas of conflict:
Planning Area #1 - Several
potential areas of conflict exist
north of St. Joseph River. The
residential areas, located adjacent
to Lake Michigan, limit public
access to beaches and are near

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

environmentally
(beach areas).

sensitive

areas

Another potential area of conflict is
the redevelopment area, north of
the river. When redevelopment
occurs it should be designed to
minimize the impact to surrounding
areas - such as the residential
areas to the west. When planning
for future uses in the
redevelopment area, the large
amount of land within the 1DO-year
floodplain should be planned for in
order to avoid potential conflicts.
Another conflict that currently exists
in the area is the existing site of
environmental contamination (see
Environmental Contamination
Sites).
Planning District #2 - The major
potential conflict on Marina Island
is that a large portion of the island
is in the 1OD-year floodplain. This
limits the type of development that
can occur on the island. Another
conflict on the island is the existing
site of environmental contamination
(see Environmental Contamination
Sites).
Planning Districts #3, #4 and #5 Having two commercial districts
separated by a residential area and
connected by a major arterial street
creates the potential for unplanned
commercial development to occur
between the two commercial areas.
This could disrupt the existing
residential areas and detract from
the existing businesses in the two
areas.

G-9

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING LAND USE
Planning District #5 - The vacant
land in the southern portions of
St. Joseph are surrounded by both
residential and industrial areas.
Since the vacant areas are
currently acting as buffers between
these two conflicting uses it will be
necessary to create buffers
between conflicting uses if the
vacant areas are developed.

1
1
1
1

1
1

Floodplains and Sensitive Areas In addition to the previously
mentioned potential areas of
conflict relating to floodplains, there
are several other areas in
St. Joseph where conflicts can
occur that relate to floodplains,
beaches or wetlands.

•
•
~

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSNE PLAN

G-10

~

�~ffi\[ffiu

~~ ~

[fQJ)lf'QJ)~[E [Lffi\[M[Q) QJJ~lEu @(Q)i%[L~u (Q)WJ}[E(t;lf'□~lE~u ~lf'~lf'lE@□lE~

GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOALS, POLICIF.S AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

The following is a list of the issues identified in the planning process. The goals,
policies and actions listed are ways to
address the issues. The policy and
action statements present specific
methods for implementing comprehensive planning in the City. The recommended policies are stated in an obligatory sense for implementation. In order
to allow for related issues to be grouped
together, each set of issues, goals, policies and actions has been listed under
one of six major headings.
■

Major Headings are groups of issues
that are closely related to each other.

■

Issues are areas of concern which
have been identified within the City,
which the Planning Commission
believes require some manner of
attention.

■

Goals are broad statements identifying what is to be accomplished under
each topic.

■

Policies are statements which identify
what is to be done to achieve each
goal, as well as the responsible
agency.

■

Actions are statements specifying
measures identified to implement a
policy.

sites for reuse beneficial to the
St. Joseph area.
Policy:
The City will work with
Cornerstone Alliance, the owners of
the various properties and the
various State and Federal agencies
to promote the redevelopment of the
sites.
Actions:
•

Continue to work with involved
parties to cleanup the contaminated sites north of the river
(Edgewater) and on Marina
Island (the tank farm).

•

Determine the most feasible
mixture of uses to be developed
in the areas based on future land
use requirements and the future
direction of St. Joseph.

•

Work with Cornerstone Alliance,
developers, investors, property
owners, adjacent communities
and area residents to create
reuse projects that achieve areawide goals.

2. Waterfront Development

Land Use
1. Redevelopment Areas
~ : Utilizing redevelopment areas.
Goal: Complete the cleanup of contaminated sites and redevelop those

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Issue: Further waterfront development can control public access to
Lake Michigan and the River. It can
detract from the beauty of St. Joseph
by controlling views of Lake
Michigan.
Goal: Work to maintain access and
views of the waterfront by evaluating
the types of redevelopment that can
occur on the lakefront and in areas

H-1

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

that could potentially control views of
the waterfront.
Policy:
The City will strive to
maintain waterfront access and
preserve existing views of the lake by
controlling further development
through code compliance (height or
bulk limitations of structures). The
City does not control waterfront
development on land owned by the
State and Federal Governments.
Actions:
•

•

•

Determine lakefront access
points that are important for
maintaining adequate access to
the beaches.
Evaluate existing views and
determine areas that should not
be developed, or that should be
limited in height or bulk, to preserve views from important parts
of St. Joseph, i.e., bluffs, parks,
etc.
Review the zoning ordinance to
enhance access and views of the
waterfront.

3. Sensitive Environmental Areas
Issue:
Development on or near
environmentally sensitive areas can
irrevocably damage St. Joseph's
natural resources.
Goal: Preserve environmentally sensitive areas in St. Joseph by limiting
development nearby and restricting
development in sensitive areas.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Policy: The City will zone sensitive
areas so as to limit development in
and around the areas.
Actions:
•

Identify environmentally sensitive
areas.

•

Determine an appropriate buffer
zone that should be adjacent to
sensitive areas.

•

Review zoning ordinance to
protect areas designated as
environmentally sensitive by the
City.

4. Vacant or Underutilized Land
~ : The ability for St. Joseph to
expand beyond its existing borders is
very limited.
Goal:
Create opportunities for
various types of development in
St. Joseph by better utilizing existing
areas of vacant or underutilized land.
Policy: The City should create an
inventory of all existing areas of land
that are not currently being utilized to
their fullest capability.
Actions:
•

Inventory all vacant parcels of
land, include ownership and
current zoning of parcels.

•

Inventory all underutilized, abandoned or dilapidated buildings in
St. Joseph - include ownership,
SEV, size and zoning.

H-2

1
l
1

1
1
1
~

•1
~

~

-,_
-

~

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOAI..S, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

•

Contact owners of identified
parcel to learn if parcel is
marketable.

•

Encourage the development of
vacant infill parcels.

5. Separated Commercial Areas

Issue: St. Joseph has two separated
shopping areas - one is pedestrian/
tourism oriented and one is resident/
automobile oriented.
Goal: The City should not allow
commercial zoning in areas between
the two commercial areas in the City.
Policy:
In order to prevent the
creation of a large strip-type
commercial development running
between the existing commercial
areas, commercial development
should be restricted between the two
commercial areas.

•

6. Conflicting Land Uses

~ : Conflicting land uses can
detract from the value of adjacent
property and can reduce the overall
livability and workability of the City.
Goal: Preserve the integrity of various conflicting land use through
special separation, screening and
relocation of land uses.
Policy: The City should endeavor to
reduce the impact of conflicting land
uses.
Actions:
•

Identify areas where conflicting
land uses exist.

•

Identify areas where future
conflicts will occur if existing
development patterns continue.

•

Revise the zoning ordinance to
reflect the need to limit conflicting land uses, in the future, by
creating buffers between the
uses, not allowing new conflicts
to occur and minimizing the
effects of existing conflicts.

Actions:
•

0

Update the City's zoning
ordinance for commercial development standards.

•

Designate areas where commercial development can occur
without promoting strip developments.

•

Restrict existing commercial
zones that exist in the strip area,
to prevent strip development
from creeping into sound residential neighborhoods.

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Utilize future office developments
as buffers between commercial
and residential areas.

Economy
1. Commercial Businesses

Issue: Commercial businesses provide jobs for the community, help to
diversify the tax base, and help to
promote the area's tourism.
H-3

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

Goal:
Promote a business
atmosphere that encourages the
expansion of existing commercial
businesses and the location/creation
of new businesses.
Policy: The City of St. Joseph will
work with the Chamber of
Commerce, existing businesses and
potential businesses to determine
their current and future needs.
Actions:
•

•

•

•

2.

Maintain an up-to-date listing of
commercial businesses in the
area. Include a contact person
and all pertinent business
information.
On a regularly scheduled basis,
survey the businesses to determine the existing business
climate.
Maintain a list of local sites and
buildings available for existing
and new businesses to expand
or locate.

promotes new industries to locate in
St. Joseph.
Policy: The City of St. Joseph will
work with existing industries to determine their existing and future needs.
The City will also work to provide
industries looking to locate in the
area a positive experience.
Actions:
•

Maintain an up-to-date listing of
industries in the area - include
contact person and all pertinent
information about the industry.

•

On a regularly scheduled basis,
survey the businesses to determine the existing business
climate.

•

Maintain a list of local sites
available for existing or new
businesses to expand or locate
their operations.

•

Perform a target industry study
to determine the types of industries best suited to St. Joseph
(i.e., workforce skills, training
available, high school and vocational school specialty areas,
etc.).

•

Refocus existing industrial areas
under an "Urban Business Park
Concept" to beautify and give a
theme to specific industrial
areas.

Perform a market study to
determine the types of
commercial businesses that are
needed and could succeed in
St. Joseph.

Industry
Issue: Industries provide jobs for the
community and strengthen the local
tax base.

3. Tourism
Goal: Create a business atmosphere
that encourages the expansion of
existing Industrial Base and

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

~ : Adequate facilities must exist
in order to meet the needs of yearH-4

1
l
1
1

'
'
'•
'
'-

-~
~

-~

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

round residents, seasonal residents
and visitors to St. Joseph.

regulations, allowing access to
people with limited physical abilities.

.9QID: Create an equitable balance

Policy: The City will work to meet or
exceed the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act.

between providing the residents the
facilities and services they require
with the need to attract additional
tourists to the City.

Actions:

Policy: The City will work to create a
level of tourism that promotes the
overall character of St. Joseph, and
continues to attract an appropriate
level of visitors to St. Joseph.

•

Assess the accessibility of all
applicable City facilities in
St. Joseph (the assistance of a
design professional and people
with various physical limitations
can be very useful).

•

Assess all parks and outdoor
public spaces (Recreation Plan).

•

After assessing public areas
create an improvement schedule
(Capital Improvements Program)
for needed improvements.

Actions:
•

•

•

Ensure that adequate recreational facilities are available to
meet the needs of St. Joseph's
residents (Recreation Plan).
Determine level of parking
required to meet peak visitor
demands at key locations
(beach, bluffs, downtown).
Through traffic counts, determine
if weekend and holiday traffic is
adversely affecting the quality of
residential neighborhoods.

Public &amp; Quasi Public Facilities

2.

Park and Recreation Areas

~:
The City's Park and
Recreation Plan should reflect the
needs of the City's residents.
Goal: Provide a park and recreation
system that meets the needs of
various residents, age groups and
lifestyles.

1. Access

Issue: Many City owned facilities are
inaccessible to people with limited
physical abilities.
Goal:
Provide equal access to
applicable City facilities through the
use of design standards that meet
the Americans with Disabilities Act

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Policy: The City will work to provide
a park and recreation system that
meets or exceeds the needs of area
residents.
Actions:
•

Maintain an up-to-date Recreation Plan.

H-5

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

•

Work to better understand what
the residents of St. Joseph
expect from their park system through various forms of public
input.

the future expansion of MMMC/
Medical Service in St. Joseph.
Actions:
•

Work with MMMC to determine if
additional facilities are needed to
provide health care that is targeted
towards the area's residents.

•

Maintain and upgrade park and
recreation facilities to accommodate for seasonal population.

•

Assess the park system's ability
to provide recreational opportunities to residents with limited
physical and/or mental capabilities.

•

Establish forum for group discussions.

•

Determine where the goals of each
group are compatible.

Assess the recreational value
and function of additions to
parks prior to making improvements.

•

Hold open discussions together to
solve differences that may exist.

•

Modify zoning to implement solutions.

•

•

Assess the need for all existing
public park and recreation areas
in the future.

Aesthetics

Medical Services

Issue: The future growth in the
Medical Service Sector in St. Joseph
can create conflicting land uses with
the surrounding residential areas.
Goal: Promote superior health care/
medical services while preserving the
character of the surrounding
neighborhoods in St. Joseph.
Policy: The City, Mercy Memorial
Medical Center (MMMC) and residents in the surrounding neighborhoods should have open lines of
communications in order to promote
a cooperative atmosphere where all
parties are involved in any plans for

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

'
'1
1

'•
~

1. Appearance
3.

1
1
1
1

Issue:
Maintaining the overall
appearance of St. Joseph is vital to
preserving the City's beauty and
appeal to residents and visitors.
Goal: Maintain and improve the
overall appearance of St. Joseph.
Policy: The City of St. Joseph will
work to maintain and improve the
overall appearance of the City.
Actions:
•

Ensure all public facilities are
properly maintained.

•

Work with businesses to reduce
unnecessary signage.
H-6

~

~

~

~

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOAIS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

•

Continue to limit the placement
of billboards to industrially zoned
properties.

•

Continue to provide for sound
code enforcement.

•

Work with political parties to
create mutually beneficial ways
to reduce the size, duration and
quantity of political campaign
signs.

•

Work with the owners and
Michigan's Bureau of History to
have the sites placed on the
State's Register of Historic
Places.
Housing

•

•

Work with electrical/telephone/
cable television utilities to
encourage underground lines
and aesthetic screening.
Maintain street tree and curb
lawns.

2. Historic Preservation
Issue: Historic buildings, areas and
neighborhoods should be preserved
to maintain the City's character.

----

~ : Affordable housing is needed
to encourage people of all age
groups to live in St. Joseph.
Goal: Encourage the development
of affordable housing for households
with a range of incomes and
lifestyles.
Policy: The City will identify areas
where a variety of housing types can
be made available and encourage
the development of housing units of
varied costs and types by allowing
for a variety of housing densities.
Actions:

Goal:
Preserve and improve
St. Joseph's character and quality of
life through the preservation of historical or architecturally significant
buildings.
Policy: The City, in cooperation with
local historic societies, will work to
recommend sites and areas that are
of historic interest to St. Joseph.
Actions:
•

0

1. Housing

Identify structures and areas that
should bA maintained or preserved as' historic sites.

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

•

Identify infill sites where singlefamily units can be built in existing neighborhoods.

•

Promote housing designed with
varied senior lifestyles in mind.

•

Zone areas for higher housing
densities.

•

Identify areas appropriate for
condominium/ congregate style
housing and zone those areas
for alternative housing by Special
Land Use.

H-7

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

•

Determine where higher density
multiple-family rental housing
O.e., apartments) would best fit
into the landscape.
Transportation

1. Streets

Issue: Maintaining the City's street
system is vital to ensuring a safe and
convenient transportation network
throughout the City and points
beyond the City.
Goal:
Maintain and improve
St. Joseph's streets to allow for safe
and efficient inner-city and intra-city
travel.

2.

Downtown Parking

~:
Adequate parking in
St. Joseph's downtown is an important part of the downtown's success.
Goal: Ensure that adequate parking
exists to allow shoppers easy access
to downtown businesses and public
facilities.
Policy: The City will work to ensure
that adequate parking is available in
the downtown area.
Actions:

Policy: The City will work through
the Department of Public Works and
the Michigan Department of Transportation to maintain and improve the
street system, in order to meet the
existing and future transportation
needs of the area.

•

Continue to monitor the local
parking situation in the downtown area.

•

Determine future parking needs
for special events and tourism as
growth occurs.

Actions:

•

Identify areas that can be used
to meet any future parking
needs.

•

Monitor employee parking downtown to determine employee
parking
shopper /tourist
conflicts.

•

•

•

0

and where major street improvements will occur.

Conduct inventories of areas
where streets are in need of
repair, and input to a Capital
Improvements Program.
Through traffic count records,
analyze trends to find where
improvements to lane condition
and traffic flow are needed, (i.e.,
widen lanes or establish one-way
streets).
Through the Capital Improvements Program, schedule when

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

3. Alternative Transportation
Networks

Issue: Maintaining and improving the
City's sidewalks and other pathways
is a viable way to reduce inner-city
automobile trips, while providing a
source of recreation.
H-8

I
I

'I
I

'I
'I
I

-

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

Goal: Provide an improved network
of sidewalks and other pathways.
Policy:
The City of St. Joseph
encourages the use of alternative
transportation networks by maintaining the existing network and expanding/improving the network in the
Mure.
Actions:

4.

•

Perform an inventory of the existing network of sidewalks and
pathways to determine the existing conditions of surfaces.

•

Maintain the operation of the
existing network.

•

Identify where the network needs
to be upgraded or expanded.

•

Determine areas where crosswalks should be located to provide continuous paths of travel.

•

As the local street system is
improved or expanded the
improvement or expansion of
alternative transportation networks should be considered.

Policy: Work with the Twin Cities
Area Transit Authority to ensure the
level of Dial-a-Ride services match
St. Joseph needs.
Actions:
•

Continue to support the concept
of public transportation.

•

Conduct surveys of residents in
non-service areas to determine if
the existing service area should
be expanded in cooperation with
the Twin Cities Area Transit
Authority.

Public Transportation
Issue: Ensuring that adequate public
transportation is available in
St. Joseph is necessary to meet the
special needs of St. Joseph's various
age groups.
Goal: Work to provide adequate
public transportation.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

H-9

�FUTURE LAND USE

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FUTURE LAND USE
Introduction

In order to determine an appropriate
distribution of future land uses it is
necessary to consider several factors.
These factors include the existing
distribution of land, location of arterial
streets, location of rail transportation,
location of environmentally sensitive
areas, density standards, public opinion,
common sense and planning. These are
the major factors that will guide the
designation of future land uses in
St. Joseph.
This section of the Plan, which analyzes
future land use distribution lists two
separate sets of acreage figures. The first
set lists the future land use requirements.
These figures are based on established
planning standards and an evaluation of
projected growth in the area. These
standards do not consider such things as
the existing distribution of land uses, the
amount of available land, qualities unique
to the community or other factors that
are difficult to quantify. The acreage
figures are used as a guide for overall
land use requirements - they do not
necessarily represent the future of
St. Joseph.
The other acreage figures are based on
the future distribution of land as shown
on the Future Land Use Map (Map 1-1 ).
This information is presented for both the
City and the five planning areas.
Future Land Use

factors, such as housing densities,
persons per household and housing
types can all influence the amount of
land that will be required for residential
uses.
Table 1-1 shows that the "average" urban
area has between 35 and 39 percent of
its land occupied by residential uses. In
St. Joseph this would equal between 764
and 851 acres of land. St. Joseph's
residential uses currently occupy 40.8
percent of the City's land. This figure is
slightly higher than the average, which
can be attributed to several things such
as larger lots, seasonal homes and the
fact that St. Joseph is a nice place to
have a home. St. Joseph is oriented
towards serving residential uses - as
opposed to many other land uses.
Hou_s1ng neeas in St. Joseph are not
e-xpectea to drastically change in the
Mure. While the population is expected
to continue to decrease, much of the
decrease can be attributed to decreasing
household size - not a decreasing
number of households.
Table 1-2 shows that the acreage
requirements, based on the assumption
of a decreasing population, will decrease
by 0.8 acres by 2010 (essentially no
change). While this means the amount
of residential land required to serve the
residents of St. Joseph will remain fairly
constant, it does not mean that land for
residential development should not be
set aside.

Residential

The main factor influencing the amount of
residential land required by a community
is population growth or decline. Other

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

l-1

�~

&lt;.._J.,,".1/'/l.. ' ' (

-1:s-

C

~

~c.;

~~

A

LEGEND

H;;;;;;;;::;::::1

~
~

RESIDENTIAL

&lt;'

COMMERCIAL

~

INDUSTRIAL

lililililili!i!ii

PUBLIC/QUASI PUBLIC

~

REDEVELOPMENT

I

I

J

~

VACANT

.¢'

✓

~

/20~./tlW'I{__~/::·

•·
b~$)%:~i~lil

-~
·;•;;

~~~

•

~

· ,n,: &lt;

~

FT:,.

';iii
:~~·•'!!•-~1·-, ; ; :,;,
1111
:1111

:,_p::·

· · ··· ······ V

~

-~ ~ 1·~\

::::;l~17:mw:::n,v
•

---··- · ·- ··.:

!:\:imi:\:\,i

MAP , 1

11lli:~rnird

SCALE

,-.•.•
500·

o·

....

N

1000· 1500·

I

2500'

GOVE ASSOCIATES INC.

I SAINT

josEPH:

MICHIGAN
FUTURE LAND
USE MAP

I

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FUTURE LAND USE
TABLE 1-1
COMPARISON OF STANDARD LAND USE DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
TO ST. JOSEPH'S LAND USE DISTRIBUTIONS

Residential

35% to 39%

40.8%

Commercial

4.8% to 5.0%

5.2%
5.0%

10% to 11%

Industrial

(12% with redevelopment area)

Streets

20% to 26%

13.3%

Public

10% to 18%

15.9%

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.; The Urban Pattern

TABLE 1-2
FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS: CITY OF ST. JOSEPH
(Based on Standards &amp; Population Projections)

y~~Qge,ih

=1· ~:~e : ~~ii:;:;1t1t=1tt:;~~~-~

Acreage_In

-~~~a!c~!g~

Residential

889.7

890.9

885.0

887.2

889.7

888.9

-0.8

40.7

Commercial

112.6

112.6

112.6

112.6

112.6

112.6

0.0

5.1

Public

347.1

347.1

347.1

347.1

347.1

347.1

0.0

15.9

Manufacturing

109.0

130.8

152.6

174.4

196.2

218.0

+109.0

10.0

Redevelopment

152.4

152.4

152.4

152.4

152.4

152.4

0.0

7.0

Vacant

199.6

177.6

160.7

136.7

112.4

91.4

-108.2

4.2

Transportation
(Streets)*

289.5

289.5

289.5

289.5

289.5

289.5

0.0

13.3

Transportation
(Rall)

82.4

82.4

82.4

82.4

82.4

82.4

0.0

3.8

2, 182.3

2, 182.3

2, 182.3

2,182.3

2, 182.3

2, 182.3

0.0

100.0

Land Area

*The amount of land required for future streets will Increase proportionally to the land
developed. Increases do not appear in this category since each of the increases In land uses
for the various categories are net figures - which include streets.
SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I-3

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FUTURE LAND USE

People, or developers, wishing to build
new dwellings will be more likely to locate
in St. Joseph if there are areas in which
to build. St. Joseph does not have a
great deal of suitable land available for
future residential development. Since
several of this plan's goals relate to
developing housing, it is essential to set
aside adequate acreage to meet the
City's future housing goals.

Planning Area #1 currently has 91.4
acres of residential uses. This figure is
not expected to significantly change in
the future, unless a portion of the
redevelopment area is used for
residential purposes.
No significant
residential redevelopment exists or is
planned for Planning Area #2.

The future land use map shows an
additional 86 acres of residential land by
2010. This will account for 44.7 percent
of St. Joseph's land area (Table 1-3).
Planning Area #3 will remain the area
with the most residential acreage (381.8
acres). This figure accounts for 49.2
percent of the planning area's land.
Residential areas are located throughout
the planning area. The amount of land
set aside for future residential use in
Planning Area #3 is 17.1 acres more
than is presently being used.

The amount of land required for
commercial development in an area is
dependent on several factors such as the
area's population, the size of the market
area, the quality of available shopping,
the availability/ quality of shopping in
surrounding areas (competition), and
many other factors. While population is
a factor in commercial development it
does not influence the amount of land
required as much as residential
development.
Between 4.8 and 5.0
percent (Table 1-1) of the "average" urban
area's land is devoted towards
commercial land uses. Currently there
are 112.6 acres of commercial
development in St. Joseph, or 5.2
percent of the City's area - slightly higher
than the average (Table 1-2).

The planning area with the second most
future residential acreage is Planning
Area #5, with 256. 7 acres.
This
accounts for 53. 1 percent of the area's
land and is a 64.9 acre increase over the
existing residential acreage - the largest
residential increase of the five planning
areas. The residential areas are located
throughout Planning Area #5.
Planning Area #4, with 245.8 acres of
future residential uses, is the area with
the highest proportion of residential land
uses (59.9%). The amount of land to be
reserved for residential uses is only 4.0
acres more than currently exists in the
planning area - so very little is expected
to change in Planning Area #4 in regards
to residential uses.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Commercial

Many businesses are designed to serve
the weekend visitor, especially during the
summer. With this in mind a figure of 0.2
percent above the average urban area's
range is not excessive.
Another standard use for judging the
amount of land a community can support
is cited in The Urban Pattern. The
standard indicates that 50 feet of street
frontage per 100 persons in the area is
adequate.
If this rule is followed,
St. Joseph has actequate crommercial
land available to upport 52,300 pers ns,
1-4

~

·~--

"~
--~

.~

�TABLE 1-3

0

FUTURE LAND USE DISTRIBUTION
(Based on Future Land Use Plan, Map H-1)

(')

~
~
Vl

i{ ::: •:• ;::,:::.}

ti• ·•• ):iiAA~frid•• N,~•:1.JU•·t:u• 1::n

;l

....

;:•e.&lt;isting/ft.Jtu"
1: : • ~1t~tif•:· •· ·.

0

Vl

tt1

~

(')

0

~

;
Vl

~

~

Residential
% of Land Area

Commercial
% of Land Area

Public
% of Land Area

Redevelopment

I

o.o

44.7
33.4

+38.0

44.3
5.5

32.9
9.3

0.0

36.9
27.5

+ 11 .9

o.o I

42.2
31 .5

0.0
0.0

Transportation
(Streets)*
% of Land Area

39.6
11.2

% of Land Area

I

0.0
0.0

Vacant
% of Land Area

I

~r4'$ .

27.1
7.7

o.o I
o.o I
o.ol

I

o.o I

0.0

::F~~~hin~Iw;,~1rnN]·::1:;,m:qit/;pt'~TJqsep~/C. ·
1

•· •· •· •:•~:~~f

I

. Existing/Future ;

I

\~!::1Ji:

1

!• •·• •1: ~j!ii:• • _111•. · •_: :•_ :1: •~-•E&gt;c;lstfn.g/futur\( ·:• ~i:i~:.•. ~s~irig/F1,1ture

;1:1••;••:1•1·:

1 ·_

0.0
0.0

152.4
43.1

(Rail)

4

:t~!!i•·•·• : • :••••:••11••·•·•:::;• • ·•;: • ·•:•~ -:r._l_n_:::::::•i•!
E&gt;dsti11g/f1Jture Acr!!L~isti~g/f:utut!'.;

;•···::::r

0.0 I

% of Land Area

Transportation

l .::. P,liy,ni~g(v~~~;i&gt;-: .•• , •••• ····•· Planhin~~e~f4

91.4
25.9

9.9
2.8

Manufacturing
% of Land Area

pi~~tiiri~f'.N~~-~~.s.;

·••••

::_:_t•_.:1111_•

256.7
53.1

+64.9

975.7
44.7

+86.0

+15.6

67.3
13.9

+33.6

199.9
9.1

+87.3

46.0
11 .2

0.0

42.1
8.7

0.0

366.81
16.8

+19.7

3.3
0.8

+0.8

54.7
11.4

+0.2

115.61
5.3

+6.6

0.0

0.0

0.0
0.0

0.0

I

0.0

0.0
0.0

-20.5

0.0
0.0

-98.7

0.0

58.2
14.2

0.0

57.1
11 .8

0.0

289.5
13.3

0.0

36.5
4.6

0.0

13.5
3.3

0.0

5.3
1.1

0.0

82.4
3.8

0.0

381 .81
49.2

+ 17.1

245.81
59.9

+4.0

0.0

43.5
10.6

208.9
26.1

+7.8

+6.3

5.5
0.7

-0.7

0.0
0.0

0.0

0.0
0.0

0.0

0.0
0.0

-56.2

0.0
0.0

-24.2

10.2
7.6

0.0

124.5
15.5

0.0
0.0

0.0

o.o

152.4
7.0

-0.0

Total Land Area

353.3

0.0

134.0

0.0

801 .5

o.o

410.3

0.0

483.2

0.0

2,182.3

0.0

Total Area
(includes water)

408.1

0.0

195.3

0.0

817.9

0.0

464.7

0.0

483.2

0.0

2,369.2

0.0

*The amount of land required for future streets will increase proportionally to the land developed. Increases do not appear in this category since each of the increases in
land uses for the various categories are net figures • which include streets.

SOURCE: Gove Associates Inc.

I

VI

-199.6

0.0

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FUTURE LAND USE
or 2r,300 pe sons fa -commercial areas
south of Har ison ~venue and 31,000 for
areas norfh of arrjson Avenue.

Area #'4 cringing tfle to_al ac'fea§e-to
43.5 acres. Most of the new commercial
areas will be along the St. Joseph River.

The Future Land Use Map (Map 1-1) has
an additional 87 .3 acres of commercial
land designated throughout the City - to
keep pace with the increasing service
industry and to allow for an improved
tourism and commercial base.

In Planning Area # 1 no commercial land
is being set aside, unless some form of
commercial development occurs in the
redevelopment area.

Much of the new commercial development (33.6 acres) will occur in Planning
Area #5, making it the area with the
most commercial development. Much of
the existing commercial development in
the planning area exists along Niles
Road. The new commercial development
will occur in the southwest corner of the
planning area, along Hawthorne Avenue,
Kerth Street and Hilltop Road.

The amount of land required for industrial
land uses is largely based on the
desirability of the area to industries. If a
community wishes to attract industries
there are certain requirements that need
to be met, such as good transportation
facilities,
quality workers,
good
infrastructure and land that is ready to be
occupied.

Planning Area #2, Marina Island, will be
the second largest commercial area due
to the development of commercial
marinas and other marine related
activities. An additional 38 acres is being
designated to bring the island's
commercial area to 44. 7 acres, or 33.4
percent of land. Most of the land is
located on the eastern side of the Island,
along the St. Joseph River.
Planning Area #3 currently has the
largest amount of commercial land (44.3
acres), but is not expected to change a
great deal in the Mure - since the
commercial land uses in the area are
already well-established. The commercial
land uses in Planning Area #3 are
located in or adjacent to St. Joseph's
Central Business District.
An additional 15.6 acres of land is being
designated as commercial in Planning

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Industry

Table 1-1 shows that the average urban
area's industries occupy between 1O and
11 percent of the area.
The City's
industrial uses currently occupy only five
percent of St. Joseph.
If the
redevelopment area (which used to be
primarily industrial) is included, a total of
12 percent of St. Joseph's land can
currently be considered industrial land.
In order to increase the amount of
industrial land in St. Joseph to 1O percent
of the City's area, the amount of land
would need to be doubled. The only way
to double the amount of industrial land in
St. Joseph would be to use a large
portion (109 acres) of the redevelopment
area.
This is possible even though
current preliminary plans indicate that
once the cleanup of the area is
completed the area will be used for less
intensive purposes - such as recreation
and residential. If the land was dedicated
to light industrial or warehouse uses it is

I-6

II
~

•
-..
~

--~

~
~~

~

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FUTURE LAND USE

likely that it would remain vacant for a
period of time vntil appropriate
businesses locate on the site.
Table 1-3 shows an increase of 6.6 acres
of industrial land in the Mure - none of
which is located in the redevelopment
area.
Planning Area #5 will have the largest
amount of industrial land, with 54. 7
acres, or 11.4 percent of the area's land
- no significant change will occur from
what currently is located in Planning Area
#5.
Planning Area #2 (Marina Island) will
have a total of 42.2 acres of industrial
land, or 31.5 percent of the area's total
acreage. This reflects an increase of 6.3
acres of industrial land, the largest
increase of any planning area.
The planning area with the third largest
amount of industrial land is Planning Area
#1, which has 9.9 acres of industrial
land, or 2.8 percent of the area's land.
The redevelopment area is also located
in Planning Area # 1, so the potential for
increased industrial activity exists.
Planning Area #3 and #4 both have
small amounts of industrial land uses and
are not going to significantly change.
Public Land

The amount of land required for public
facilities is directly related to the
population of the community and the
level of services offered by the
community.
Since St. Joseph offers
services to nonresidents this accounts for
much of the public land, which is still
within acceptable ranges. The beaches

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

~long Lake Michigan and some of the
many City parks are a few of the City's
amenities that are meant to be enjoyed
by both residents and nonresidents. The
combination of the beaches in the City
and the shops designed for the visitors is
the basis of the tourism industry 'for the
area.
Table 1-1 lists the desired amount of
public land to be between 10 and 18
percent - the widest range offered for any
of the categories. St. Joseph's figure is
15.9 percent, which is reasonable since
the City's figure is near the high end of
the range. Table 1-2 shows the amount
of public land remaining constant in the
future. Table 1-3, which reflects the future
land use map, shows an increase of 19.7
acres of public land.
Planning Area #3 currently has the
largest amount of public land and will
continue to into the future. With 208.9
acres designated for various public uses,
over 26 percent of the area's land will be
used for public uses - an increase of 7.8
acres from existing public use acreage
figures.
Planning Area #4 has the second largest
amount of public land with 46.0 acres, or
11.2 percent of the area's land. This
figure will remain the same in the future.
Planning Area #5, with 42.1 acres, has
the third largest amount of public land.
This area will also remain unchanged in
regards to public land. An additional
11.9 acres of land on Marina Island
(Planning Area #2) are being set aside
for public uses - the largest increase of
public land of the five planning areas.
No changes are planned for Planning
District #1.
1-7

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FUTURE LAND USE
Transportation

The amount of land required for future
street requirements is directly related to
how much development occurs in the
City of St. Joseph. Table 1-1 shows that
streets generally occupy between 20 to
26 percent of an urban area's land generally the second largest land use. In
St. Joseph the streets occupy 13.3
percent of the City's land. This large
difference can be attributed to the large
areas of land that have no streets
crossing them, especially on the north
side of the river, Marina Island and the
southwestern portions of the City. The
ravine area prevents many east-west
streets from connecting. Additionally,
many areas along the St. Joseph River
and Lake Michigan have limited street
access.

Land required for additional rail
transportation is not expected to
increase, but would be more likely to
decrease. Many spurs in the redevelopment area will most likely be removed especially if the area is going to be used
for nonmanufacturing related uses.

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I

The fact that St. Joseph's street system
is not based on a true grid, but is
influenced by natural features is the main
reason that streets are not as dominant
in St. Joseph as other areas.
Table 1-3 shows that o incre se in
streets is planned_, but this is not actually
true. Since all of the future land use
acreages for the various categories are
net figures, streets would be included
with these figures. To determine an
approximate level of additional street
acreage, the existing percentage of street
acreages for the City (13.3%) has been
applied to the vacant land and the
redevelopment area. A figure of 46.8
acres is arrived at using this method
which would bring the total amount of
land required for streets to 336.3 acres,
or 15.4 percent of the City's land area.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I

I-8

•
•

�CONCLUSION

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONCLUSION
In order for this plan to be implemented
it will take the continued efforts of the
planning Commission: City Commission
and staff, as well as the people of
St. Joseph. There are others whose
cooperation will be necessary, but the
overall responsibility for the
implementation of the plan lies with the
previously listed people.
For the plan to be an effective tool, it will
be necessary to continuously review the
plan to ensure that it continues to reflect
the needs of the people. This should be
done on a regularly scheduled basis to
ensure that the plan is used and does
not become outdated before its time.
A major review and update should be
scheduled for the year 2001, when the
Census information from the 2000
Census becomes available. This major
review should be used to update
population figures and facts as well as to
revise projections if necessary.
Members of the planning Commission
should occasionally review the plan on
their own, and treat their copies as an
active tool - their plans should become
well used and worn - not dusty.
New members of the planning
Commission should be provided with
new copies and should become familiar
with the plan. This will ensure a degree
of continuity between old members and
new members - but it does not mean that
new members should not question the
plan.
If these points are kept in mind, the plan
will act as a guide for St. Joseph to
follow into the future.

0

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

J-1

�APPENDIX A

St. Joseph Planning Questionnaire
St. Joseph Key Person Survey

�ST. JOSEPH PLANNING QUESTIONNAIRE

Zoning and land use are critical to the future of St. Joseph. These areas are being evaluated by the City Planning
Commission as part of a Master.Plan Update. This questionnaire is one of the early steps. The Planning Commission
is asking you to take a few minutes to answer the questions and return the form to City Hall. The form may be dropped
off at City Hall, or returned by mail. Thank you for your cooperation and input to the Master Plan for the future of St.
Joseph. Your thoughts and opinions are a valuable part of the Master Plan.
1.

Are you an adult City resident? (a) __ or/non-resident property owner? (b) _ _

2.

To what age group do you belong?

(1) _19-24

(2) _25-34

(3) _35-44

(4) _45-54

(5) _55-64

3.

If a City resident, do you own your home? (1) __ Yes (2) __ No

4.

Please indicate which category your total family Income fell into last year.

(1)
Below $14,999
(2) -$15,000-$19,999
(3)
$20,000-$24,999
5.

(4)
$25,000-$29,999
(5) -$30,000-$34,999
(6)
$35,000-$39,999

(7)
$40,000-$49,999
(8) -$50,000-$74,999
(9)
$75,000 Above

Which of the following residential types should be encouraged as future development? (Please indicate all
desired types)

(5)
Senior Congregate Housing
(6) --Modular Homes
--(Prefabricated Single-Family)
(6) __Other (Please Explain): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

(1)
Single-Family Residences
(2) --Multi-Family (Apartments)
(3) --Duplex (Two-Family)
(4) -Condominiums

6.

(6) _65 and Over

Where do you shop and the frequency?
# Times/Month

(a)
Yes
No Downtown St. Joseph
(b) -Yes-No Other Areas in St. Joseph
(c) -Yes -No Niles Area
(d) -Yes =No Benton Township

# Times/Month

(e)

Yes

No

(f) -Yes-No
(g)-Yes-No
(h) Other

South Bend Area
Kalamazoo/Grand Rapids
South Haven

Areas_____________

7.

Are there specific commercial businesses or professional services which you feel are needed in St. Joseph?

8.

How do you feel the older manufacturing areas should be redeveloped in the future? (Answer all appropriate)
(1)
Residential
(2) --Commercial

(3)
Public
(4) --Business/ Industry

(5) __ Recreation/Open Space

9. · Is there a particular type of recreational activity which you would like to see developed in St. Joseph?

�ISSUE IDENTIFICATION:

10. Indicate your Impressions of the following facilities/services/areas and what level of attention they need to make
St. Joseph a better community in the future?
(a) Housing Conditions
(b) Library Facilities
(c) Recreational Facilities
(d) Bicycle Path Development
(e) School Facilities
(f) Fire Protection Facilities
(g) Police Facilities
(h) Traffic Flow
(i) Sidewalk Access
0) Neighborhood Parks
(k) Snow Removal
(I) Downtown District
(m) Mercy Memorial Med. Ctr.
(n) Ausco Property Redevel.
(o) Tourism
(p) Family Orientation
(q) YWCA
(r) Churches
(s) Waterfront Areas
(t) Marinas
(u) Livability of City
(v) Tax Base
(w) Semi-Public Uses
(x) Overall Appearance
(y) Other (Please specify) :

Current Condition/Situation
{1)
Good {2)
Average
{1)-Good {2)-Average
{1 )-Good (2)-Average
(1 )-Good (2)-Average
{1)-Good (2)-Average
(1)-Good (2)-Average
{1 )-Good (2)-Average
{1 )-Good {2)-Average
{1 )-Good {2)-Average
{1)-Good {2)-Average
{1 )-Good {2)-Average
(1 )-Good (2)-Average
(1 )-Good (2)-Average
{1 )-Good {2)-Average
{1 )-Good (2)-Average
{1 )-Good (2)-Average
(1 )-Good (2)-Average
{1 )-Good (2)-Average
(1 )-Good (2)-Average
(1 )-Good {2)-Average
(1 )-Good (2)-Average
(1)-Good {2)-Average
(1 )-Good (2)-Average
(1)_Good (2)
Average

{3)
Fair
(3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
(3)-Fair
{3)-Fair
(3)=Falr

11. Future
{1)
High
{1 )-High
(1 )-High
(1 )-High
{1 )-High
(1)-High
(1 )-High
{1 )-High
{1)-Hlgh
(1)-High
(1 )-High
(1)-High
(1)-High
(1)-High
{1 )-High
(1 )-High
{1 )-High
(1 )-High
(1 )-High
{1 )-High
(1 )-High
{1 )-High
(1)-High
(1)=High

Attention
{2)
Average
{2)-Average
{2)-Average
(2)-Average
{2)-Average
(2)-Average
{2)-Average
{2)-Average
{2)-Average
{2)-Average
(2)-Average
{2)-Average
{2)-Average
{2)-Average
(2)-Average
(2)-Average
{2)-Average
(2)-Average
(2)-Average
{2)-Average
{2)-Average
{2)-Average
(2)-Average
(2)
Average

(3)
Low
{3)-Low
{3)-Low
{3)-Low
{3)-Low
(3)-Low
{3)-Low
{3)-Low
(3)-Low
(3)-Low
{3)-Low
(3)-Low
{3)-Low
{3)-Low
(3)-Low
(3)-Low
(3)-Low
{3)-Low
{3)-Low
(3)-Low
(3)-Low
(3)-Low
(3)-Low
(3)
Low

COMMENTS: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I
I
I
I

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
"~

Ill

1111

�Name

Date

St. Joseph Master Plan
Key Person Survey
1.

What are trends in the St. Joseph Area over the last 5 to 1O years dealing with economic,
physical development, public policy, political/socialjneighborhood climate?

2.

Identify major current development and planning issues, problems and opportunities in
St. Joseph.

3.

Identify emerging or future opportunities or problems for St. Joseph.

�4.

Who are local leaders that could accomplish or restrict the future of St. Joseph (city,
county, neighborhood, business, planning commission)?

I
I

,.
I
I

5.

What do you think should be the product or benefit of an updated St. Joseph Master
Plan?

6.

Identify data, information or reports that we could use in the Master Plan process or local
people with which you believe we should talk.

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
""
"

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010240">
                <text>St-Joseph_Comprehensive-Plan_1993</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010241">
                <text>Gove Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010242">
                <text>1993-02</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010243">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010244">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan for the City of St. Joseph was prepared by Gove Associates, Inc. in February 1993.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010245">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010246">
                <text>St. Joseph (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010247">
                <text>Berrien County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010248">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010250">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010251">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010252">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010253">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038448">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54614" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58885">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e512888c1a7c3f54a1844fbbe44487b8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e507f77f1ed40c7fbfae749a8a8ceb10</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1006974">
                    <text>COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

2021-2026

�THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
Plan best viewed in Adobe Acrobat as in two page view mode.
Navigate to View / Page Display / Two Page View.

�__

BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Date Adopted: __________________
Date Effective: ___________________
TOWNSHIP CONTACT INFORMATION
Website: www.bathtownship.us
Address: 14480 Webster Road
PO Box 247
Bath, Michigan 48808
Email:
info@bathtownship.us
Phone: (517) 641-6728
Fax:
(517) 641-4170

�THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
Plan best viewed in Adobe Acrobat as in two page view mode.
Navigate to View / Page Display / Two Page View.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 3

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Marie Howe, Supervisor
Brenda Butler-Challender, Clerk
Steve Wiswasser, Treasurer
Jason Almerigi, Trustee
Joe Benzie, Trustee
Ryan Fewins-Bliss, Trustee
Allen Rosekrans, Trustee
PLANNING COMMISSION
Dan Kramer, Chair
John Reich, Sr., Vice Chair
Jason Almerigi, Member
George Baker, Member
Ryan Fewins-Bliss, Township Trustee Representative
Joel Gutzki, Member
Bob Howe, Member
Raymond Severy, Member
BATH TOWNSHIP PLANNING STAFF
Karen Hildebrant, Superintendent
Nick Tafelsky, Former Planner
Miles Roblyer, Planner
Tayler Reeves-Hodge, Deputy Superintendent
Bert Gale, Building Official &amp; Zoning Administrator
PREPARED BY
Tayler Reeves-Hodge, Deputy Superintendent
Katherine Schmidt, Design Consultant

«

Thank you to all who have
contributed their time and
energy to this endeavor.

�| PAGE 4

CONTENTS
5|INTRODUCTION
9|OFFICIAL ZONING DISTRICT MAP
12|FUTURE LAND USE
16|GOALS
27|APPENDICIES:
COMMUNITY PROFILE
Overview of Property and Population
POPULATION PROFILE
State &amp; Region Contextual Population Statistics
Socioeconomic Projections
Distribution of Sexes
Racial Make-Up
Age Distribution
Education
Households &amp; Housing
Health
ECONOMIC PROFILE
State &amp; Region Contextual Population Statistics
Key Industries
Employment Forecasts
Income
NATURAL FEATURES
TRANSPORTATION
COMMUNITY PROFILE

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 5

INTRODUCTION
&amp; VISION
The 2020 Bath Charter Township Comprehensive Plan (The Plan) is the result of over two years of
work by the Bath Township Planning Commission, Board of Trustees, Township staff, and citizens.
This plan is a significant update from previous versions of the Township Comprehensive Plan. The
intent of this update was to develop a document that is more user-friendly and can be utilized by both
Township staff and residents alike.
The Comprehensive Plan is a policy document created to guide development of the township. The
Plan was created by the Planning Commission and Township staff, guided by input from township
residents who share a deep respect for the township’s past, who understand present conditions and
trends, and who strive to advance the aspirations that they have for the township’s future. As the
principal guide of land use policy for the Township, the Comprehensive Plan directs Township efforts
in land use planning and growth management, environmental stewardship, economic development,
housing, efficient transportation, and other relevant areas.

“Growth is inevitable and desirable, but
destruction of community character is not. The
question is not whether your part of the world
is going to change. The question is how.”
-Edward T. McMahon, Senior Resident Fellow,
Urban Land Institute

�INTRODUCTION | PAGE 6

)

HISTORY OF
BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP
Many early settlers came to this region from the state of New York when the Erie Canal
opened. This was due to the region offering abundant natural resources, plentiful farmland, and
a healthy environment where families could prosper.
Bath Township was first surveyed in 1826 by Harvey Parke. However, it was not until
1844 that Bath Township came to be Bath Township. Originally, Bath Township, together
with Victor Township, was known as Ossowa Township. Silas W. Rose Sr., the first Township
Supervisor, was instrumental in having the Township separated from Victor Township and the
name changed to “Bath” Township, after his hometown in the state of New York.
Bath Township remained relatively small and unincorporated until the establishment
of the railroad in 1857 from the city of Lansing to Owosso, dissecting Bath Village en route.
The original owner of the railroad was the Amboy Lansing and Traverse Bay Railroad. The
railroad proved to be an incredible catalyst to Bath Township’s economy. A grain elevator, stock
yards, grist mill, hotels, restaurants, and sawmills were all a part of Bath Township’s economy
and employment base. However, the investors of the railroad did not see the line as profitable.
Over the course of a century, the railroad eventually passed hands to Penn Central Railroad,
its final owner who abandoned the line in 1976. While the railroad’s decline initially presented
a challenge for the community, the construction of the I-69 highway brought new life to the
community. Today, Bath Township once again has a flourishing business climate, with over sixty
independent businesses within its borders. Because of the ease of access to the Tri-County area
and it’s small-town charm, the town remains an ideal place to raise growing families in a safe
and healthy environment.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 7

“Long-range planning does not
deal with future decisions, but with
the future of present decisions.”

AUTHORITY TO PLAN

-Peter F. Drucker, Author and Educator

Planning in Michigan is unique due to Michigan being classified as a “home-rule” state. Home-rule
means that local governments, including Townships, are given the ability to form a governmental body
that makes decisions and laws at a local level. Bath Charter Township has its own governmental body
in the form of the Township Board of Trustees. Governments are given planning decision-making
through the Standard State Enabling Act of 1926 and the Standard City Planning Enabling Act of 1928.
Both pieces of legislation gave state and local governments the authority to divide the local government’s
territory into districts, propose zoning regulations, and propose procedures for establishing and
amending the zoning regulations. These two laws also allowed for state and local governments to
develop comprehensive plans for the jurisdiction and gave the Planning Commission the ability to
approve comprehensive plans.
Bath Charter Township is authorized to prepare and implement the Comprehensive Plan through the
Michigan Planning Enabling Act (Act 33 of 2008). The stated purpose of the act is:

To codify the laws regarding and to provide for county, township, city, and village planning;
to provide for the creation, organization, powers, and duties of local planning commissions;
to provide for the powers and duties of certain state and local governmental officers and 		
agencies; [and] to provide for the regulation and subdivision of land.
This Act contains several requirements governing the content of municipal plans. Some of these
requirements identify specific elements that comprehensive plans must include, while others establish
goals and policies which, if relevant, must be addressed. Both types of requirements have guided the
development of this plan.

RELATIONSHIP TO ZONING
The Michigan Zoning Enabling Act states that the “zoning ordinance shall be based upon a plan
designed to promote health, safety and general welfare, (and) to encourage the use of lands in
accordance with their character and adaptability…” The Comprehensive Plan is the long-range planning
document upon which planning and zoning decisions are based, including creating and amending the
Township zoning ordinance. Although the Comprehensive Plan is a policy document and does not have
the force of law, it is the basis of the zoning ordinance.

�INTRODUCTION| PAGE 8

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PLANNING PROCESS
The 2020 update officially began on January 29, 2019 when the Planning Commission moved to
begin the planning process. This was followed by letters to surrounding communities informing
them of the Township’s intent to plan, as required by the Michigan Planning Enabling Act.
Planning staff began working on the framework of the updated plan and writing the first draft of
the chapters. At the same time, the Township began public engagement efforts.
The first of the public open houses were held on May 23, 2019. These open houses did not draw
a lot of attention, but the conversations that resulted from them gave a direction for further efforts.
An additional open house was held on July 11, 2019. Advertisement for this open house was sent
out with the summer tax bill and advertised on the Township’s website. As a result, the July 11,
2019 open house had much greater attendance.
Further input was received from residents during the 2019 Bath Days Festival on August 2 and
3, 2019 when both the Planning Commission and former Downtown Development Authority
(DDA) staffed a booth and spoke to residents. Information from the July 11 open house was given
to residents at the Bath Days Festival. Throughout the creation of this Comprehensive Plan, this
document was placed on the Bath Township Planning Commission’s agenda over 30 times, which
allows the subject to be open for public comment.

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens
can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”
- Margaret Mead, American Cultural Anthropologist and Author

IMPLEMENTATION &amp; AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan and its goals, objectives, and actions will be implemented through the
local regulatory processes, the work and actions of various Township committees and boards, and
the activities of Township government departments.
Regulatory forms of implementation include the administration of the Township’s code of
ordinances and the relevant development review processes it dictates. Non-regulatory forms of
implementation include the updating and amending of the Township’s Capital Improvements Plan
(CIP), as well as development of other studies and plans by Township staff. Upon adoption of this
plan, the Township’s code of ordinances will be reviewed and revised to be consistent with the
goals, objectives, and policies outlined in this plan.
Consistent with state law, the Planning Commission will review and, if necessary, update the
Comprehensive Plan every five years. However, the Planning Commission may review and

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 9

�OFFICIAL ZONING DISTRICT MAP | PAGE 10

Rath Charle TOWilllship
Offida Zom g Dismd: Map
ZmlingDisbiEts

Demsity ~:4A-nirmemt
Jei'4~crmemt

HOR-

DR - Medium ~ l y ___,,,___

D
D

-11.ow DernsJtr Residential
R-Rwra
P- PUIBJ TC

Parcels o.wted [by MOOf
425 - Ea5t Lall15iiru

Watet·

Zoning Dvem,lay Dishid:s
~ Access Ma

la&lt;letlnent

[0a DEv:elqpmentt
J

-

-

-- -- -

Ovetiaf/

:~l.::ttil

425 - Dew.'itt

1

J

l'

-

..

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 11

VISION
Bath Charter Township has historically been a rural, agricultural
township. Continued suburbanization of the Lansing region has
placed growth pressures on the southern portions of the township,
and there is little reason to expect that these pressures will not
continue. The Township will continue to strive to develop a
community that ensures smart land use by balancing the economic,
social, and environmental needs of all residents. The community will
continue to acknowledge the diverse interests that have been present
in the township for decades. Reducing and resolving conflicts between
suburbanization and agricultural preservation will be viewed as both
our challenge and, by creating a common purpose, our strength.
The vision this document represents is driven by principles which
are important to the community. Bath Charter Township strives
to recognize, preserve, and celebrate its rural character. This rural
character is especially evident in the northern half of the township
where rural zoning and a lack of infrastructure has led to larger lot
single-family residential development, among remaining natural or
farmed areas.
In between the urbanized south and the rural north lies the Bath
Village area. The Bath Village generally runs along Main Street
between Clark Road and Sleight Road, and includes a mix of singlefamily homes, multi-family buildings, and local commercial and
office uses. Built on a grid with street trees and sidewalks, the Bath
Village area is the only area most like a traditional downtown in Bath
Township. Targeted investment with both public and private funds
could serve as a catalyst to new development and could help the area
see its full potential.
There exists a desire to pursue context-appropriate development as
the township grows. Bath Township welcomes new development
that is smart, innovative, and recognizes the important role that
rural lands play in the community. Smart Growth is compatible with
urban, suburban, and rural areas alike. Finding ways to promote
development while preserving rural and natural areas will be an
important consideration for Bath Township’s future.

+
=

PRESERVATION

OF RURAL

CHARACTER

INNOVATIVE NEW

DEVELOPMENT

S M A RT
GROWTH

�FUTURE LAND USE | PAGE 12
•

-

~ ~
FUTURE
LAND USE

~

~

-., r

.

WJilll"~

·•·.

....

•

~

·.

.~-~·
!"'...-:·· . .

' ' \ 1\
•

~ . :-.
~-4

.

._ .

,
111\\,\:
...____

• ·

This section of the Comprehensive Plan describes the definitions of future land use patterns as they are
portrayed in the Future Land Use Map. These future land use patterns incorporate, where feasible, the
Township’s growth principles described previously in this document.

RURAL RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS
The least intensive development pattern with primary emphasis on open space preservation, large parcel
single-family detached residential development, very low-density cluster single-family residential development,
individual or community utility systems, agricultural use accommodation, open space, and the accommodation
of compatible land uses through the utilization of special use permits (agricultural production, specialized rural
oriented low intensive commercial services, home occupations, etc.).
Future Land Use Map Designation: Rural 		Density: Maximum of 1 dwelling unit per 2 acres

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN| PAGE 13

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS
This is defined as low, moderate, and high-density residential development typically found in individual parcel,
platted, planned unit/cluster developments, site condominium developments, or other creative residential
options, with a variety of housing structural types, centralized public or private utility systems, planned open
space and/or environmental conservation measures, connected by a coordinated pedestrian pathway system,
and accessible to a public street system capable of appropriate ingress and egress, and served by community
recreational services.

•

Future Land Use Map Designation:

Density:

LOW-DENSITY 		

MAXIMUM OF 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE

Future Land Use Map Designation:

Density:

MEDIUM-DENSITY			

MAXIMUM OF 4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE

Future Land Use Map Designation:

Density:

HIGH-DENSITY

7 TO 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE

Future Land Use Map Designation:
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY

,a,a,a ,a,a ,a,a,a,a
,a,a,a ,a,a,a,a,a,a

Density:
MAXIMUM OF 18 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE

Mlp2:

Bath Cha-ter Township.
Futul9 land UN Map

.........,_

--·-~
................ ....
--_
___
-----~
............
D

--

,_

.,..,,...,....._.

•11--c-,..i
---,--411 _ _ . . . _

. ........... ; . 1 -

* An enlarged copy of Map 2 Bath Charter Township: Future Land Use Map can be found on pages 55-56.

�FUTURE LAND USE | PAGE 14

MIXED LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS
This is defined as medium to high-density residential development, office/research/light industrial
development, and commercial retail/wholesale services land uses which serve the community, as well as
the region, and accommodate more intensely developed non-residential land uses through the special use
permit process (retail, light industrial, warehousing, research, medical, and service-oriented businesses).
This land use category includes the Chandler Road Corridor / Chandler Crossings area and the M-78/
Marsh Road area.
Future Land Use Map Designation: Mixed Land Use
Future Land Use Map Designation: Manufactured Home Park

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN| PAGE 15

TOWNSHIP ACTIVITY CENTER
This is defined as the centrally located geographic area which represents the focal point of
the community and includes such land uses as the Township Offices, Community Center,
the traditional village area, and the central location of office, commercial development,
and higher-density housing.
Future Land Use Map Designation: Township Activity Center

COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
This defined as the small-scale retail, wholesale, professional office and professional
services, and auto-oriented interchange commercial land uses which serve the community.
Future Land Use Map Designation: Community Commercial

COMMUNITY FACILITIES
This is defined as the Township-owned facilities providing governmental, public safety,
educational, recreational, or other public services.
Future Land Use Map Designation: Community Facilities

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL / WAREHOUSE
This is defined as the light industrial, storage, warehousing, and related uses which serve
the community and region.
Future Land Use Map Designation: Light Industrial / Warehouse

�GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES | PAGE 16

GOALS &amp;
OBJECTIVES
A VISIONARY PLAN FOR ACTION &amp; IMPLEMENTATION
Township staff, in consultation with the Planning Commission, developed a list of overarching goals for
this Comprehensive Plan and a list of issues facing Bath Township. The key issues facing the Township that
were identified were:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Multiple diverse identities associated with different geographies of the township
Housing-jobs balance
Environmental protection/preservation
Housing variety/affordability
Growth pressures
Internet access
Sewer issues
Non-motorized transportation

Once these key issues were identified, a set of eight goals were developed. Many comprehensive plans try
to have only one goal per issue area (land use, transportation, housing, etc.); this plan acknowledges that
there are some issues that overlap specific goal areas and has a set of goals which reflect that reality. Each
goal is accompanied by objectives and actions that provide a clear blueprint for how to achieve that goal.
It should also be noted that the goals and objectives are aspirational in nature; not every one of these will
be achieved.
M

GOALS
1:

UR

HO

N

O
OR

2:

TH

RY

O

T
HIS

G

Y
RIT

RIO

P
IFY

NT

IDE

W
RO

3:

PR

O

T
TEC

THE

ME

N
IRO

V
EN

4:

NT

CO

EN

GE

A
UR

5:

D

IC

O
EC

6:

T

EN

CI
FFI

E, E

AF

S
EA

T

EA

CR

P

LO

E
EV

M
NO

T

N
ME

PR

O

E
VID

SPO

N
TRA
C

FA

ND

A
IES

ILIT

7:

E
LYZ

TA

CA

TE

YS

S
RT

O
ST

ICE

V
SER

8:

O
ET

IV

STR

NT

E
PM

LO

VE

E
ED

ERS

DIV

L

AL

TE

INN

A
OV

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 17

GOAL 1:

HONOR THE RICH HISTORY OF THE TOWNSHIP THROUGH CONTEXTSENSITIVE DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY DECISIONS IN ORDER TO
FOSTER A STRONGER SENSE OF COMMUNITY

OBJECTIVE 1 | ENACT POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THE TOWNSHIP’S IDENTITY
Action 1 | Work with the Township’s Deputy Superintendent to strengthen communications strategy and 		
branding.
Action 2 | Hold an annual joint meeting of the Township Planning Commission and Board of Trustees to further 		
strengthen communication and planning between the two boards.
OBJECTIVE 2 | ENGAGE IN ZONING-BASED PLANNING ACTIVITIES TO PROMOTE ORGANIZED DEVELOPMENT
Action 1 |Conduct an annual review of the Township zoning ordinance to find areas of weakness or sections that 		
may need revision. Initial revisions will prioritize previously identified areas of need, such as subdivision
regulations, environmental issues, housing diversity, and the development review process.
Action 2 | Promote the redevelopment and/or infill of under-utilized commercial properties.
OBJECTIVE 3 | STRENGTHEN BATH TOWNSHIP’S POSITION AS AN IDEAL COMMUNITY TO LIVE, WORK, AND PLAY
Action 1 |Continue to support the Bath Days Festival and other community events to foster a stronger sense of
community.
Action 2 | Institute a placemaking initiative sponsored by the Public Art Committee and Township Planning staff.
Action 3 | Identify ways to make it easier for seniors in the township to age-in-place.
Action 4 |Work with the Recreation Department to identify opportunities for improvements and expansions of
Township parks and recreational facilities as recommended in the Parks and Recreation 5-Year Plan.
Action 5 |Identify resident needs and priorities through periodic outreach efforts including surveys, workshops,
town halls, etc.
Action 6 | Consider future options for renovations, new buildings, or combination of the Senior Center and the
Community Center.
OBJECTIVE 4 | ENHANCE RURAL PROSPERITY AND FOOD SECURITY BY PROMOTING AGRICULTURAL LAND USES 		
		

AND CRAFT PRODUCTION

Action 1 |Increase awareness and consumption of locally-produced agricultural and craft products through the Bath
Farmers Market, newsletters, social media, and Township events.
Action 2 |Aid in the development of a community-sourced food initiative that supports locally-produced food 		
availability, especially for families and individuals who have food insecurity.
Action 3 | Support community gardens by providing space and resources.
Action 4 |Encourage responsible agricultural practices in the production of animal and plant products by 		
encouraging state Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs).
Action 5 |Promote educational opportunities on small-scale farming and gardening techniques, food handling and
preservation, and craft production.
Action 6 | Conduct a product survey to identify the range of agricultural and craft products produced within Bath
Township.
Action 7 | Support local producers through infrastructure development.

�GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES | PAGE 18
TOWNSHIP, WHICH CAN REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE
GOAL 2: THE
ANTICIPATED FUTURE GROWTH
IDENTIFY PRIORITY GROWTH AREAS ON THE SOUTH-END OF

OBJECTIVE 1 | CONTINUE COORDINATION BETWEEN VARIOUS REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS
Action 1 | Host an annual meeting with the development community to identify potential development projects and 		
priorities.
OBJECTIVE 2 | DEVELOP SPECIALIZED PLANS, AS NECESSARY, FOR LOCATIONS AND TOPICS WITHIN		
		
THE TOWNSHIP THAT WARRANT SPECIAL ATTENTION
Action 1 | Draft a corridor plan for the Webster Road corridor, from I-69 up to Clark Road, that recognizes general 		
development issues and concerns, such as mixed land uses, walkability, utility burial, street lighting and 		
furniture, unified public signage, landscaping, and the possible need for a frontage road on the west side of
Webster Road.
Action 2 | Review and update the Bath Village plan as needed in order to adjust to current conditions and promote		
further development.
Action 3 | Develop a small-area plan for the neighborhoods around Park Lake, which recognizes the primarily small-		
lot residential nature of the area. This plan will recognize resident concerns including view of the 			
lake, open space and environmental preservation, waterfront development regulations, non-conforming 		
parcels, and the desire to limit commercial use of the lake and the surrounding area.
Action 4 | Create a plan for the Saginaw Highway/Old M-78 area to guide future commercial and industrial growth.
Land uses with high vehicular traffic will be located to the west of Marsh Road along Saginaw Highway, 		
while land uses with lower traffic volumes will be to the east of Marsh Road and primarily along Old M-78.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN| PAGE 19

GOAL 3:

PROTECT CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS AND
DEVELOP NEW ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION METHODS
WITH AN EMPHASIS ON GREENFIELD PRESERVATION AND
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

OBJECTIVE 1 | DEVELOP POLICIES AND ORDINANCES RELATED TO VARIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL TOPICS
Action 1 | Create a wetlands ordinance to protect priority wetlands within the township.
Action 2 | Draft a landscape ordinance for new commercial, industrial, and mixed-use developments to better 		
manage stormwater in an aesthetic way.
Action 3 | Explore various options for protecting prime farmland in the township.
Action 4 | Review the zoning ordinance to clarify and/or upgrade requirements that have environmental impacts 		
such as drainage, soil suitability, wetlands, and various dimensional standards, which would include 			
compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II permit requirements
of the Clinton County Drain Commissioner for those portions of Bath Township within the identified 		
Greater Lansing Urbanized Area. (See map on page 61-62)
Action 5 | Continue to research and map sensitive areas such as wetlands, floodplains, groundwater recharge areas, 		
watersheds, wildlife habitats, prime farmland, Public Act 307 sites, minerals, and other unique natural 		
features to utilize in development review decisions.

�GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES | PAGE 20

GOAL 4:

ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WHICH
LEVERAGES THE TALENT DISTINCTIONS OF THE TOWNSHIP
WITH AN EMPHASIS ON SMALL BUSINESS.

OBJECTIVE 1 | ENGAGE IN APPROPRIATE PROGRAMS TO STRENGTHEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 		
		
OPPORTUNITIES IN THE TOWNSHIP
Action 1 | Review whether it would be beneficial for the township to become a certified Redevelopment Ready 		
Community through Michigan Economic Development Corporation.
OBJECTIVE 2 | FACILITATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THAT FULFILLS THE NEEDS AND DESIRES OF THE
		
COMMUNITY
Action 1 | Survey residents on the types of development and businesses that they would like to see in the township.
Action 2 | Promote the development of independent businesses owned by Bath Township residents.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 21

GOAL 5:

CREATE A SAFE AND EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
FOR THE MOVEMENT GOODS AND PEOPLE WITH ADDED
OPPORTUNITIES FOR NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION.

OBJECTIVE 1 |DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT PLANS AND PROJECTS TO DEVELOP A WELL-ESTABLISHED 		
MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
Action 1 | Develop and implement a sidewalk plan for identified priority growth areas.
Action 2 | Review existing Township access management standards and identify possible changes to improve traffic		
safety and flow.
Action 3 | Work with government agencies, non-profit entities, and other regional partners to plan for and build a 		
Township trail network.
Action 4 | Build non-motorized transportation facilities, such as sidewalks, trails, and bike lanes, where appropriate.
Action 5 | Identify ways to connect existing neighborhoods to improve walking and biking opportunities.
Action 6 | Planning staff will continue to monitor the long-range transportation plan and inform the Planning			
Commission if there is any change on the status of the I-69/Chandler Road interchange.
Action 7 | Consider the possible impacts of new and expanded development along Chandler Road on the need for 		
an expanded road network.
Action 8 | Work with the Township Superintendent and Board of Trustees to create a list of priority transportation		
projects with estimated costs and timelines.

....

�GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES | PAGE 22

GOAL 6:

PROVIDE ADEQUATE FACILITIES AND SERVICES TO ALL
RESIDENTS AND MAKE STRATEGIC FUTURE INVESTMENTS
IN NEW INFRASTRUCTURE WITH A FOCUS ON PRIORITY
GROWTH AREAS

OBJECTIVE 1 |MAKE APPROPRIATE INVESTMENTS IN IMPROVEMENTS AND 			
EXPANSIONS TO TOWNSHIP INFRASTRUCTURE
Action 1 | Identify and implement necessary upgrades and expansions to the sewer system
Action 2 | Facilitate improvement to available internet services within the township, including
working with providers and engaging in public-private partnerships where appropriate

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MORE DIVERSIFIED HOUSING
GOAL 7: CATALYZE
STOCK IN ORDER TO ENSURE FAIR HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL
OBJECTIVE 1 | IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES TO PROMOTE A GREATER VARIETY OF
HOUSING TYPES
Action 1 | Review the zoning ordinance and amend it as necessary to allow for “missing
middle” housing, such as townhouses and multiplexes, where appropriate.
Action 2 | Explore adopting ordinance language allowing for alternative housing types, such as
tiny homes, live-work housing, and cottage clusters.
OBJECTIVE 2 | ENSURE THAT NEW AND EXISTING HOUSING IS OF A HIGH QUALITY
Action 1 | Determine whether the adoption of a rental housing ordinance or rental housing
inspection program would be of benefit to the community.
Action 2 | Draft a set of architectural standards guidelines for new commercial and
multi-family housing projects.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 23
TO BE INNOVATIVE AND FORWARD-THINKING IN
GOAL 8: STRIVE
PLANNING DECISIONS

OBJECTIVE 1 | LEVERAGE VARIOUS EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL ASSETS TO STRENGTHEN 		
PLANNING COMMISSION AND PLANNING STAFF KNOWLEDGE
Action 1 | Strengthen working relationships with Michigan State University’s staff and students.
Action 2 | Continue to research and learn about the latest innovations and ideas in planning through webinars, 		
conferences, and other events.

OBJECTIVE 2 | IDENTIFY WAYS TO BROADEN UNDERSTANDING OF THE PLANNING PROCESS AND 		
PROFESSION
Action 1 | Engage in periodic community engagement and outreach activities including charettes and open houses to
discuss planning issues and ideas.
Action 2 | Draft a frequently asked questions section for the Planning &amp; Zoning page on the Township website.

�GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES | PAGE 24

TOWNSHIP GROWTH PRINCIPLES
In addition to goals, objectives, and actions, the Planning Commission also developed a
series of Township Growth Principles. Each of the goals, objectives, and actions in this
plan serve at least one of the Township Growth Principles.

PRINCIPLE 1| RECOGNIZE, PRESERVE, AND CELEBRATE THE 		
		
TOWNSHIP’S SMALL-TOWN CHARACTER
IDENTIFY SMALL TOWN

Bath Charter Township prides itself on the agricultural lands, parks, and natural areas which cover much of the township outside of the Urban Service Boundary (USB)
(See map on page 60-61). The Bath Village area lies on the northern edge of the USB
and contributes to the small-town feel. These areas provide a special way of life, both
economically and culturally, for lifelong residents and newcomers alike while attracting
visitors and new residents to Bath Township.
PRESERVE SMALL TOWN
Identification of important landscapes makes preserving them a much simpler task.
Calling attention to wetland protection or stormwater filtration efforts can present learning and community participation opportunities. Farm-to-fork explorations can highlight
to residents how important the community’s agricultural lands are to the Township.
Focusing development in areas of the township which are better suited to more urban
activities, like the Bath Village area or the M-78/Marsh Road area, makes preservation
of the rural areas that much easier.
CELEBRATE SMALL TOWN
Providing easy access to parks, such as James Couzens Memorial Park, natural areas,
like the Rose Lake State Game Area and the activities within them is one way in which
the Township hopes to celebrate its character. When combined with a sense of rural
separation achieved through focused development efforts, the Township hopes to create
a small-town character unique to Bath Township.

1

RECOGNIZE, PRESERVE, AND
CELEBRATE THE TOWNSHIP’S
SMALL-TOWN CHARACTER

2

PURSUE CONTEXT
APPROPRIATE
DEVELOPMENT

3

FOCUS ON DESIGN
WITH THE FUTURE IN
MIND

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 25

PRINCIPLE 2| PURSUE CONTEXT-APPROPRIATE
DEVELOPMENT
BALANCE DEVELOPMENT
Emphasis will be placed on creating places that fit
together within the greater context of the township.
Where small-town character is desired, effort shall
be put into creating structures and amenities that
will help develop that feel. Alternatively, where larger
commercial or residential opportunities are desired,
policies which encourage such activities shall be considered.
CONTEXTUALIZE DEVELOPMENT
Dense development is encouraged within the Bath Village area, which is intended to be a gathering center
that is inviting and accessible to all. To attract such
development, the Township is open to allowing developers to bring any necessary infrastructure to provide
amenities. These amenities, such as sewers, can be
connected to the Township’s existing utilities, but any
necessary upgrades are the developer’s responsibility.
FOCUS DEVELOPMENT
By advocating for concentrated centers of commercial and residential activity, and by limiting utilities to
within the USB rural areas are encouraged to retain
their character without the pressure of development.
It is expected that by allowing denser urban growth
within the USB and rural development in the rest
of the township, the community can appeal to many
demographics.

BALANCE
small-town charm
with developed
opportunity

CONTEXT
must be a priority in
lasting infrastructure
and placemaking

FOCUS
on character in
concentrated,
purposeful places

�GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES | PAGE 26

PRINCIPLE 3| FOCUS ON DESIGN WITH THE FUTURE IN MIND
LINK FOR THE FUTURE
An essential focus is the ability to cope with linkages between the rural, residential, and
commercial interests that are all present and changing within the township boundaries.
Creating appropriate separation, while still inviting integration among uses, will be a
focus in all planning decisions.
INNOVATE FOR THE FUTURE
The Township strives to incorporate appropriate and diverse pedestrian, bicycle, and
vehicular circulation and storage into the design of all projects. This means taking into
account initiatives which are already in place, such as the Township’s Non-Motorized
Plan, when planning for new non-motorized routes, especially sidewalks. Provisions for
complete streets will be encouraged where appropriate within the USB, which can attract
bicyclists to the area. Sustainable parking solutions, such as permeable surfaces, shared
parking lots, and electric vehicle charging stations, would contribute greatly toward
alleviating environmental issues while bike and/or stroller parking can go a long way in
encouraging alternative thinking in terms of travel patterns.
PLAN FOR THE FUTURE
Successful development is driven by the integration of the zoning ordinance, Comprehensive Plan, and community leaders working together toward cohesive goals and objectives. It is essential that regulatory documents, and those who are charged with their
interpretation, work in tandem to avoid confusion on issues of development, design, and
direction. It is the intention of the goals, policies, and objectives to provide direction for
the future.

“An essential focus is the ability
to cope with linkages between
the rural, residential, and
commercial interests that
are all present and changing”

�APPENDIX | PAGE 27

APPENDIX CONTENTS
28|COMMUNITY PROFILE
29|POPULATION PROFILE
29|State &amp; Region Contextual
Population Statistics
32|Socioeconomic Projections
33|Distribution of Sexes
33|Racial Make-Up
34|Age Distribution
35|Education
36|Households &amp; Housing
38|Health
39|ECONOMIC PROFILE
39|State &amp; Region Contextual
Population Statistics
40|Key Industries
43|Employment Forecasts
44|Income

45|NATURAL FEATURES
45|Topography
46|Watersheds
47|Lakes and Rivers
48|Wetlands
48|Soils
49|Agricultural Land
49|Woodlands
49|Environmental Concerns
50|Flood Plain Map
51|TRANSPORTATION
51|Roads
52|Alternative Transportation
53|COMMUNITY FACILITIES
53|Township Buildings
54|Police Service
54|Fire and EMS Service
55|Schools
55|Recreation
55|Cemeteries
56|Water and Sewer Service
57|ENLARGED FUTURE LAND USE MAP
59|URBAN SERVICE BOUNDARY MAP
61|LANSING URBANIZED AREA WITHIN
CLINTON COUNTY MAP

�COMMUNITY PROFILE | PAGE 28

COMMUNITY
PROFILE
Bath Charter Township is located in the southeastern corner of Clinton County. Adjacent to
Bath Township, DeWitt Charter Township lies to the west, Victor Township to the north, Woodhull
Township in Shiawassee County to the east, and Meridian Township in Ingham County to the
south. Clinton County is part of the Tri-County Region and shares that association with Ingham
and Eaton Counties. The city of Lansing is the largest city in the Tri-County region and plays a
vital role in its surrounding communities. It is also the location of Michigan’s State Capitol.
The neighboring city of East Lansing is home to the largest university in the state of Michigan.
Due to its geographic proximity and socioeconomic similarity to the rest of the Tri-County
Region and many of the municipalities which lie within its bounds, it is important to analyze how
Bath Charter Township compares in terms of overall population and housing characteristics.

Bath Charter Township &amp; Clintion County 2019 Median Housing Values
        $1,000,000 or more
        $750,000 to $999,999
        $500,000 to $749,999
        $300,000 to $499,999
        $100,000 to $299,999
        $50,000 to $99,999
        Less than $50,000

-I

-

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Percent

• Bath Township

• Clinton County

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2019 ACS Tables S2506

55

60

65

70

75

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 29

POPULATION
PROFILE
STATE &amp; REGION CONTEXTUAL POPULATION STATISTICS
The population profile paints a statistical picture of the population of Bath Charter Township. It
compares Bath Township with the surrounding regions in terms of overall population, distributions
within the population based on age, race, education, and household characteristics.

MICHIGAN
The 2020 U.S. Census showed that the state of Michigan was home to 10,077,331 people. This was
a 1.96% increase from 2010 and showed that the state gained 193,691 residents over the ten-year
period. Currently, Michigan is ranked tenth nationally in terms of overall population. This showed
that more people are moving to the state than are moving out of the state. The 2020 Decinnial
Census indicates that the state’s population loss seen in the 2000 - 2010 time period has been
reversed.

III

Michigan Population 1980 - 2020

2020

10,077,331

2010

9,883,640

2000
1990
1980

9,938,444
9,295,287
9,262,078

Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 1980,1990, 2000, 2010, 2020 Decennial Census Table P1

�POPULATION PROFILE | PAGE 30

TRI-COUNTY REGION

The Tri-County area, which includes Ingham, Clinton, and Eaton Counties, surrounds the city of Lansing
and, in many ways, acts as a single economic region. For this reason, it is important to address population
trends within the Tri-County area over the past few decades. Much like Michigan’s population, the TriCounty population grew in the 1980’s and 1990’s, but in contrast, it continued to grow at a steady pace.
Between 1980 and 2000, the Tri-County region continuously grew at a rate of around 3% annually.
According to the 2020 U.S. Decennial Census, the Tri-County area had a population of 448,568. The
2020 population states that the Tri-County region’s population has increased to 482,427, which represents
a 3.87% increase since 2010.

Tri-County Population 1980 - 2020

III
2020

482,427

2010

464,461

2000

448,568

1990

433,482

1980

419,750

Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 1980,1990, 2000, 2010, 2020 Decennial Census Table P1

CLINTON COUNTY
Clinton County lies in the heart of mid-Michigan, north of the city of Lansing. It is a predominately rural
county with a few small municipalities, including the city of DeWitt, DeWitt Charter Township, the city
of St. Johns, and Bath Charter Township. Clinton County has experienced a notable influx of residents in
recent decades. There is an abundance of land in the county adding to the appeal for residential use and
adding to population pressures. Clinton County’s population has continued to increase, according to the
Census data, with the fastest ten year period increase taking place between 2000 and 2010.

III

Clinton County Population 1980 - 2020

2020

79,753

2010

75,382

2000

64,913

1990

58,136

1980

55,893
0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 1980,1990, 2000, 2010, 2020 Decennial Census Table P1

100,000

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 31

BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP
Bath Charter Township had a population of 5,746 in 1980. The township’s population continued to
increase to 6,387 in 1990 and 7,541 in 2000 before experiencing a huge increase to 11,598 in 2010.
The 2010 Census data showed that of the forty-eight townships in the Tri-County region, Bath Charter
Township was the fastest growing township from 2000-2010, with a growth rate of 53.80%. Many other
jurisdictions within the region saw dramatic decreases in population. Some explanations behind the
exploding population rates are the availability of rural and vacant land, the proximity to urban areas, and
the addition of a large number of multi-family residential units. It is apparent that Bath Charter Township
has had pressure in the residential sector. Most of this pressure came from the development of student
apartments in the DeWitt 425 area, also known as the Chandler Crossing area. 				
Population estimates from the Decennial Census indicate that Bath Township’s 2020 population had
increased to 13,292. This represents a 14.6% increase from 2010 and most likely represents continued
multi-family residential growth in the township. The growth rate for the township since 2010 is greater than
Clinton County’s (5.8%) and the State’s (1.96%).

Population Change Comparison
Jurisdiction

1990

Change

2000

Change

2010

Change

2020

Bath Township
Clinton County

6,387

18.10%

7,541

53.80%

11,598

14.61%

13,292

58,136

11.66%

64,913

16.13%

75,382

5.8%

79,753

Michigan

9,295,287

7.00%

9,938,444

6.47%

9,883,640

1.96%

10,077,331

Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 1980,1990, 2000, 2010, 2020 Decennial Census Table Pl

III

Bath Township Population 1980 - 2020

2020

13,292

2010

11,598

2000

7,541

1990
1980

6,387
5,746

Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 1980,1990, 2000, 2010, 2020 Decennial Census Table: P1

�POPULATION PROFILE | PAGE 32

POPULATION PROJECTION
Population projections are important when planning and determining growth for an area. Projections help
with overall economic, land use, and community planning, and thus need to be thoughtfully reviewed.
Projection calculations are approached by first examining past growth rates and trends for the Township to
determine whether growth is consistent or changing.
In examining Bath Charter Township growth trends,
one can see a fairly consistent and linear growth pattern
until the year 2000, at which point the township
experienced its highest growth rate of the previous
forty years. Much of this growth took place in the
first half of the decade, as population growth slowed
significantly when building growth slowed in 20062007. Much of the last decade’s growth can be
attributed to several multi-unit housing developments
that have attracted a high college student population to
the southern portion of the township.

25,000

Projected Population Growth in Bath Township

20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

2030

2040

2050

The Tri-County Regional Planning Commission (TCRPC) updated their forecasts for population
projections in 2010, based on the 2010 Census, with assumptions regarding shifting employment classes and
age of population, which were outlined in the document entitled

SOCIOECONOMIC PROJECTION
The township experienced larger growth than was shown in the Tri-County projections. New and
expanded multi-family residential and mixed-use developments in the southern third of the township have led
to the significant growth at a higher percentage than predicted by TCRPC in 2010. The TCRPC is expected
to update their population projections after the 2020 Census.
Since 2000, Bath Charter Township has been the fastest-growing township in Clinton County, as well
as the Tri-County region. If this trend continues, Bath Township should plan for an increased population
of 68%, bringing the total to 19,608, by 2050. If Bath Township continues to grow at rates similar to the past
decade, this projection could be significantly higher.
Another component of a population projection includes the Build-Out Analysis, a tool used to
determine the population if the Township were built to its maximum allowable capacity (barring any
environmental limitations). A Build-Out Analysis was performed for the 2014 Master Plan, which showed
that if Bath Charter Township were built to capacity, there would be an additional 62,571 residents and an
additional 23,347 housing units in the township. This would bring the total population up to approximately
72,353 and the total number of housing units to 28,042. It is unlikely that Bath Township will reach these
levels of population and housing units, as a Build-Out Analysis does not consider other limiting factors in
development, such as availability of septic service or the presence of unbuildable wetlands. However, it is still
an important tool to assess the maximum capacity of the township land and zoning ordinance.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 33

~

1\

t

(t

2010
49.10%

50.9%

.n.

2019
51.40%

48.58%

DISTRIBUTION OF SEXES
The U.S. Census figures showed that Bath Charter Township’s 2010 population of 11,598 was comprised of a slightly higher male population with
50.9% males and 49.10% females. Clinton County was similarly comprised
with a slight majority of the population being female. Bath Township’s
distribution of males to females is estimated to have changed by about
1.6% between 2010 and 2019. According to estimates from the Census, the
female population increased to 51.41% of the population in 2019.

RACIAL MAKE-UP
The racial make-ups of Bath Township and Clinton County are very similar, both being predominately white.
Bath Township shows more diversity at 77.4% white, than Clinton County at 93.6% white, and less diversity than
the State, which is estimated to be 79.4% white.
For the township, the greatest percentage of change in racial population cohort between 2010 and 2019 was within
the white community, which dropped from 87.5% to 77.4% of the population. The greatest percentage of increase
came from the two or more races cohort, with an increase from 2.3% to 7.4% of Bath Township’s population.

Racial Make-Up 2010
Two or More Races, 2.3%

White

Some Other Race alone,
1%
Asian/Pacific Islander,
3.6%

Black or African American
American Indian and Alaska
Native
Asian/Pacific Islander

American Indian and
Alaska Native, 0.4%

Some Other Race alone
Two or More Races

Black or African
American, 5.2%

White, 87.5%

Racial Make-Up 2020
White

Two or More Races,
7.4%
Some Other Race
alone, 1.9%
Asian/Pacific Islander,
6.9%
American Indian and
Alaska Native, 0.3%
Black or African
American, 6%

Black or African American
American Indian and Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Some Other Race alone
Two or More Races

White, 77.4%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 &amp; 2020 Decennial Census, Table P2

�POPULATION PROFILE | PAGE 34

AGE DISTRIBUTION
Age is important to look at because it helps determine what specific services need
to be in the upcoming years. Between 2000 and 2010, Bath Township’s population became significantly younger in age thanks to the addition of multi-family
residential developments, especially in the southwest corner of the township along
Chandler Road. This area saw a large influx of student tenants, which has continued at a slower rate since 2010. The median age of Bath Township went from
36.1 years in 2000 to 30.1 years in 2010.
Since that time, Bath Township has appeared to have aged. 2019 ACS data does
not report median age, but the 2016 American Fact Finder statistics report that
the median age of Bath Township had risen to 34.3 years old. No further age
cohorts were available.
The increasing age of Bath Township is further indicated by the over sixty-five
population. This group made up 16.9% of the population in 2019. In addition,
the 2019 ACS data indicated that 5.5% of the population was under five years of
ages and 24.4% of the population was under twenty years of age.
A more refined analysis of age data will be possible after completion of the 2020
Census. It is recommended that this Population Profile be updated at that time to
incorporate updated Census data. In the meantime, the table below shows the age
breakdowns within Bath Township and Clinton County as of 2019.

Age Break Down for Bath Township &amp; Clinton County in 2019
Age
19 &amp; Under
20-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Total

Bath
3,113
1,629
1,373
1,589
1,647
1,630
1,764
12,745

Bath
24.40%
12.80%
10.80%
12.50%
12.90%
12.70%
13.90%

Clinton
19,541
4,965
9,154
9,540
11,127
11,165
12,897
78,389

Clinton
24.90%
6.30%
11.60%
12.17%
14.19%
14.20%
16.45%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates TablelD: S0101

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 35

EDUCATION
Education is an important aspect of long-range community health. The 2019 ACS data summarized more
generally than Census data and is therefore not directly comparable. However, the ACS data indicates that
96.0% of the township’s residents aged twenty-five or over have attained at least a high school degree. This
is approximately 2.2% higher than the 2010 Census data showed. While this is not a drastic change, the
percentage of population aged twenty-five or over that has attained at least a bachelor’s degree has shown a
significant increase from 36.5% to 43.8%.
School enrollment has increased in the past decade as well, in line with the increase in population. The 2019
ACS estimates that enrollment of populations three years and over in Bath Charter Township was 3,952 and
in Clinton County 19,705. About half of the township’s enrolled student population, an estimated 1,897, is
enrolled in college or graduate school. Nursery and preschool students total an estimated 67 (1.7%) in the
township, and 1,000 (5.1%) in the county. Grades K-12 in Bath Charter Township comprised an estimated
1,988 (50.3%) enrolled population, compared to 13,124 (66.6%) students in all of Clinton County.

2010

93.8%
Graduated
High School
or Higher

36.5%
Completed
Bachelor’s
or Higher

2019

96.0%
Graduated
High School
or Higher

Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2010 &amp; 2019 ACS 5-Year Est. Table S1501

43.8%
Completed
Bachelor’s
or Higher

�POPULATION PROFILE | PAGE 36

HOUSEHOLDS
“Household” includes all the persons who occupy a housing unit. The occupants may be a single-family
one person living alone, two or more families living together, or any other group of related or unrelated
persons who share living arrangements. Household data can help policymakers determine the future
demands a population will place on a community.
In lieu of accurate data of all household types collected at the federal government level. Bath Township
is able to use year-over-year data collected by the Township’s Building Department. One household type
that the Township’s Building Department has tracked the most consistently over the years is new singlefamily home construction. By using only one house type as a data method to understand the housing
trends in the township and their pros and cons. A con of this is policymakers could be missing important
trends happening in other areas and, in this case, housing types. However, there are several reasons why
using a larger sample that includes more housing types could be problematic in Bath Township’s case.
A leading reason is because of local data reporting and collection issues in recent years. Another reason
this could be problematic is, the different metrics used over the years to categorize different housing types
within Bath Township. The pro of using one housing type (where the raw data is collected directly by the
Township and the metrics for this type of data has not change over the years) is data consistency. This
consistency allows staff and policymakers to make more accurate data inferences and predict housing
trends of all house types based on those inferences.

Bath Township Building Department

By the numbers, the amount of new single-family housing developed in Bath Township has been very
consistent over the last six years. Bath Township is averaging about 27 single-family homes developed per
year between 2014 and 2019. There is likely to be a significant fall in housing developments when the
data from the year 2020 is process fully, due to the Coronavirus Pandemic. However, it is the opinion of
the Bath Township Planning Department that new single-family housing developments, and therefore all
types of housing developments, will remain growing at a steady rate over the next three to five years.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 37

HOUSING
Looking at the housing profile for the township helps to provide insight to the type of housing Bath Township
residents reside in. Data related to housing helps forecast future needs in the residential sector.
According to the 2010 Census, there were 5,106 housing units in the township. The 2019 ACS data does
not indicate the number of housing units in the township, but does report on some housing statistics. This
information is shown in the Housing Statistics Table below, which compares Bath Township housing statistics
with comparable statistics from the county and the state. A more detailed analysis of housing will be possible
after the 2020 Census is published.

HOUSING STATISTICS
Housing Statistics 2019
Topic

Bath Township

Clint on County

Mich igan

Owner.occup ied Housing Unit Rat e

69.00%

80.00%

71.20%

$204,900

172,800

$154,900

$1,505

$1,407

$1,298

Median Val ue of Owner.occup ied
Housi ng Units
Median fv1ont hly Costs - Incl uding

Mortgage
Median Mont hly Costs - W it hout

--------

Mortgage

______________________________________.....,...:,!~if.~~;-;·~-~·-:~

M edian Gross Rent

1.004

Source: U.S. Census Burea u, ACS 5-Year Est. TablelO: B25077

It is important to obtain an accurate description of the number of units per housing structure in Bath Charter
Township in order to understand the intensity of land use and the demands placed by each housing structure.
The township and county have high percentages of single-family housing structures, however according to the
estimates from the 2019 ACS, Clinton County has a much higher percentage of single-family housing than
Bath Charter Township. Nearly 30% of all housing structures in Bath Township hold ten or more units.

�POPULATION PROFILE | PAGE 38

A large percentage (40.8%) of housing structures in Bath Charter Township have been built after the year
2000, according to the 2019 ACS. This is in sharp contrast to Clinton County, where only 22.1% of housing
structures have been built since the turn of the new millennium.
Housing value is an important aspect of the housing stock to examine. Proper inventory ensures that Bath
Charter Township has an adequate balance of affordable housing and high-dollar homes. According to the
2019 ACS, Bath Charter Township had an approximate median housing value of $219,100, while Clinton
County had a median value of $184,900. Both estimates are significantly higher than their 2000 U.S. Census
values, which were $123,000 and $120,500, respectively.

HEALTH
The 2019 ACS data reported two health-related statistics. According to the data, 11.2% of the township’s
population have a disability. It is unknown how that compares to past rates, but this does compare with the
Clinton County rate of people with disabilities within the population at 12.61% and the state of Michigan at
13.5%. In addition, 3.8% of persons in Bath Township under the age of 65 do not have health insurance.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 39

ECONOMIC
PROFILE
STATE &amp; REGION CONTEXTUAL POPULATION STATISTICS
The economy of Michigan, the Tri-County Region, Clinton County, and Bath Charter Township
are interrelated and dependent on each other. If the Michigan economy suffers, Bath Township
will ultimately feel the trickle effect. The same is true if Michigan’s economy is vibrant and thriving.
Thus, it is imperative to gather an accurate summary of all these jurisdictions to adequately forecast
the future of Bath Charter Township’s economy. This profile will examine the state of Michigan’s
economy, as well as the economic conditions of the Tri-County Region, Clinton County, and Bath
Charter Township. The factors being examined are income, employment, employment by industry,
and employment forecasts.

MICHIGAN
At the end of 2019, the
U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics estimated the state’s
unemployment rate to be 9.7%.
While unemployment rates are
high for the state, the median
family income has risen just
under $10,000 since the 2005
ACS to $75,703.

Bat h Township-Emp
loymen t Sta tus
--

•

2019

2 15
EMPLOYMENT STATUS

Count

MOE Percent ¾MOE

Count

MOE

Percent %MOE

Popu lat ion 16 years and over 9,93 3

110

(x)

(X)

10,471

235

(::,:)

(Xl

In I.J bar for ce

6.283

3.2.2

63.3

2,9

6,726

30&amp;

64,2

2.7

Civ il ian labor for.:,~

o,255

327

63

3

6 ,726

306

6 4 .2

2.7

Emp loyed

5,781

332

58.2

3

6 ,327

327

60.4

3

474

169

4.8

1.7

399

188

3.8

1.8

Uri@mp loy@d

28

32

0.3

0 ..3

D

16

D

0.2

Not in labor force

3. 650

305

36.7

2,9

3,745

305

35,S

2.7

Civil ian labor forc,e

6,.255

327

(x)

(X)

6,72.6

306

(x)

(X)

(X)

(X)

7.6

2.6

(X)

(X)

5 .9

2.8

Armed Forces

Urie mp lo ymen t Rate
-~11.,l@d ian Househo ld I ncom@

$

60,083.00

$

68,313 .00

-~M-ed ian Fam ily Income

$

76,605.00

$

90,060.00

• Per Capita Med ian In come

$

30,635.00

$

36,027 .00

Sou rce: U.S. Censu5 2015, 2019 ACS 5 Year Est. Ta blelD DP03. 51902, S1903
*Adj usted fo r inflation in the year t he stats were taken

�ECONOMIC PROFILE | PAGE 40

TRI-COUNTY AREA
Eaton, Clinton, and Ingham Counties together make up the Lansing – East Lansing Metropolitan
Statistical Area (MSA), as defined by the Federal Office of Management and Budget. This MSA is
referred to as the Tri-County or Greater Lansing area. Bath Township’s place in the MSA is important
to consider because federal and state transportation and economic funds come through the regional
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). As a result, the overall economic health of the region
has an impact on the township.
Lansing-East Lansi ng Metropo litan Statistica l Are a (Referred to as Tri-County or Greater Lansing
In 2015, the ACS
estimated that while actual
unemployment grew since
2015, the unemployment
rate for the Tri-County
region was down to 4.1%.
Median household income
has increased significantly
(nearly $17,000) since that
time, as well.

EMPLOYMENT STATUS
l'nrlJ ,1t inn 1 r, yf',1r&lt;, ,-,nrJ o•;pr
.
In J;i bor force
Civilidn l;;bor lorLe

Area) Employment
Status
-2015
Count MOE
Percent %MOE
41)1
3810:-l'i
4 f-+ll'&gt;
(XI
2E+O'.,
2E, 05

G3.1

0.,1

63.3
',4,8

0.4
(1.4
0.2

0.4

10G'i
100
1656

3.5

257
2E, 05

0.1
0.4

(XI

:-lf-+[I',

1h'i'i

0.1
36.6
) 8H34

5.6

0.4

0.'l

63.2
'i/.4

0.4
ll. 'i
0. 3
0,1

f-m plnyPd

/ f-+ll'i
20085

9G'i

5.3

199
1E, 05

87
1601

Civili .1n l,1borfo rrP

/ f-+ll'&gt;

1h11

0.1
36.8
)41 18(14

Unemp_l2y ,nent Rate
•Medi-, r1 Ho·J sd1uld Incom e
'MPd i.1 n f-,1 mil•1 lncnmf'

l G-19

G3.2

Unemp_l2yed
A'med rorces
Nol in l;;brn lo rLe

{:_&lt;l_ _ l:_&lt;)

8.3

s
\

4f-+II',

2019
Percent %MOE
44/h',4
{X)
4/'i

MOE

1655
1 /4/

1'.J99
1612
1 / /[I

Count
3E+05
3E, 05
:-lf-+[I'&gt;
158,1']

(:_&lt;)_ _ (:_&lt;)

0.4
50,L.21 .00
hh,14-l .[ll l

s

{X)

5'.l,117.00
/8,04(1_1)[ )

';',

$
2G,G,11 .00
•Pe r Glpitci Medi;i n Income
$
SULl ' l l': U.S. Ce nsus 2015, 201') ACS 5 YL'cH Es l. T;, b lc•ID DP03, 51')02, 51')03
• Adj usted lor in ll-, l io11 in Lill' ,'cdr l he sl-, l s Wl're l -, ( c n

31,53-1.00

“There is no purpose, to which public money can be more beneficially applied, than to
the acquisition of a new and useful branch of industry; no consideration more valuable
than a permanent addition to the general stock of productive labour.”
											-Alexander Hamilton

BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP
Bath Charter Township is the fastest growing
community in the Tri-County Region in terms
of population. This growth directly affects
the economic growth, as well as the economic
health, of the township. Where growth occurs, there is a following increase in demand
for services and businesses to be located closer
to home. Although Bath Township remains a
residential community, it is important to plan for
a growth in the economic sector as well. In the
following paragraphs and tables, Bath Charter
Township’s economic profile will be compared
to Clinton County’s profile.

Bath Township-Employment
Status
-EM PLOYM ENT STATUS

~Colmt

2015

2019

MOE Percent %MOE

Count

MOE

Percent % MOE

Popula t io n 16 years and over 9,9.33

220

(x)

(X)

10_,471

2.35

(x)

[X)

In labor force

6,283

322

63,3

2.9

6,726

306

6 4.2

2.7

Ci11i lian la bar fo rce

6,255

32.7

63

3

6,726

306

54.2

2..7

Employed

5,781

.332

58,2

3

6,327

327

60.4

3

Unemployed

474

169

4.8

1.7

39~

188

3.8

1.8

Arm@d For(@s

28

32

0,3

0,3

0

16

0

0,2

Not i fl labor force

3,650

305

36,7

2.9

3,745

306

35 ,8

2.7

Ci11i lian la bar force

6,255

327

(x)

(X)

6,726

306

(x)

(X)

(X)

(X )

7,6

2.6

(X)

(X)

5,9

2.8

Unem p~yment Rat e
"Median Househo ld Income

$

60,083.00

$

68,313.00

'·Median Family ln(ome

s

75, 505.00

$

90, 050.00

'' Pe r Capita I\J1edian Inco me

s

30,635.00

s

36,027.00

Source: U.S. Ce mus 2015, 2019 ACS 5 Year Est. Ta blelD DP03, S1902,, S1903
''Adjus;e;;d for inflation in th@ year t h@ ,tats w@r@ ta k@n

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 41

KEY INDUSTRIES
Education, health, and social services, in addition to manufacturing and retail,
continue to be the largest employment bases in the region. No other industry has
made large strides or has taken large cuts to employment since 2015, according to
the 2019 ACS.

Lansing-Eas: Llnsing Metropclit.i.n S:.i.bs:ic.i.l Area (H:eferred to .i.s Tri-Ccunt1 er ~ re.i.ter L.i.nsin9 Area:, Emplc,..,,en: Bf lndus:r)
lndus:r)
Ci•:ilian emplc)ed po.::ul.Jtion 18 years and over
Agric:ul:ure fo• estry. fistiing and hunbng and ,iining
Cons:ruc:bon
Manufacturing

2C15
C.oun:
220719
2386

8789

1 OS'¼
39S'¼

2019
Ceul"tt
277742
2829
13996

PGre~nt

P.;;reM:

1.c2r.,'n
5.,:4%

24464

11.08'',~,

29669

1 C6S%

';\'holesale :rade

3727

7 69%

6364

2.2~%

Retsilt'sde
Tren,portatio!'l and warehousing. and lt:ilites
Infcrme:icn
Financ8 and insuranc&amp; and rGal Gstate and rental and leiasing
Prc fe-ssional sci,en:ific, and management and ad'llinistrativ&amp; and ·,.,ast8 11anagement servi cGs
Edue.r:il!:n.il sar:ic&amp;s. :ind ha:11:h cara :ind social assis~nea

23607

10.70'%
3 84'~\)
1 60%
70S%
895%
26.92%
10.23"'/o

272 :J
11848
39 12
2 16C5
23239
75439
24035
14157
22196

S.791\·i;
4.27%
1.41'%
7.73%
3.39%
27 16%
S.65%
5.31 1%
a.21%

Ar:s. en:ert.linm&amp;nt. arrd recre.Jtion. a nd accommodimon a nd focd ser•1ic:es
0:her ser..,ices, exc:ept ::u=lic: ad-ninistr.Jtion
P ublic adminis:ra:icn

8468
37C9
1562 1
19752
59409
22578
1C755
17454

487'¼
791%

1

So1.11ce: J.S. Ce11s1.1s 2019 ACS 5-Yesr Est. Tst!e!C S2405

INCOME AND OCCUPATION
The median family income for Bath Charter Township in 2019 was $68,313, slightly lower than
Clinton County’s $79,390, according to the ACS. Similarly, per capita Bath Township residents
earned more annually than Clinton County as a whole, $36,077 versus $34,920. Both the township
and the county had higher per capita and family income than the state of Michigan. The 2019
ACS estimates that Bath Charter Township had 10,471 residents sixteen years or older legally able
to work, of which 6,726, or 64.2%, were in the labor force. Clinton County had 64,161 persons
sixteen years or older with 41,261, or 64.3%, in the labor force.
According to the 2019 ACS estimates, Bath Charter Township and Clinton County had similar
percentages of workers in labor classes, despite the county’s nearly seven-fold population advantage. In each job classification, both entities’ populations were within a percentage point of one
another. Both the township and the county reached nearly 75% of the employed labor force working in the private sector, and nearly 20% in the public sector.

�ECONOMIC PROFILE | PAGE 42
2019 Bath Townsh ip and Cl inton County Class of 'oJVorker
Bath Townsh ip

Count

t\,1OE+/- Percent

73

2.39%

134
118
171
81
140

7.32%
5.14%
10.94%

3758

2.10%
6.16%

459
2203

Civilian employed population 16 years and over

6327

327

Private for-profit wage and salary workers:

4324
4173
151
463
325

363
358

Employee of pritJate company wor kers
Self-employed in own incorporated business workers

Private not-for-p rofit ws..ge and salary workers
Local government workers
State government workers

Federal government workers
Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers and unpaid family workers

692
133
390

Cl inton County
Count
38589
26753
25636
1117
3321
2095

68.34%
65.96%

MOE+/- Percent
547
738
69.33%
714
66.43%
162
2.89%
318
8.61%
241
5-43%
345
9.74%
122
1.19%
248
5.71%

Source: U.S. Census. 2019: ACS 5 Years Est. TablelD: S2408

Similarly, Bath Charter Township and Clinton County mimic one
another in employment percentages by industry, according
to 2019 ACS estimates. However, the township does have
slightly higher employment rates in the Professional/Scientific/
Management, Education/Health/Social Services, and Arts/
Entertainment/Food Service sectors, presumably due to its
proximity to the cities of Lansing and East Lansing in comparison
to many other townships in Clinton County. Conversely, the
county has a higher rate of employment in Manufacturing,
Wholesale Trade, and Public Administration.

2019 B.ith Township &amp; Clinton County Employmen t By Industry
Bath Township
Count MOE+!- Percen t
Civilian emp loyed population 16 years an d over
327
6327
Agricu lture. forestr;. fishing and t1unting . and mining
0.38%
24
29
5.03%
318
119
Construction
458
142
7.24%
Manufacturing
252
102
Who lesale trade
3-98%
8_08%
511
142
Retail trade
4 _17%
264
Transportation and warehousing . and utilities
131
1.38%
87
79
Information
7_55%
Finance an d insurance, and real esta te and rental and leasing
478
154
Professional . scientific , and managemen t, and administrative and waste management services
751
181
11 .87%
Educationa l services , and hea lth care and socia l assistance
1839
284
2907%
572
163
9.04%
Arts , entertainment, and recreation , and accommodation and food services
Other services , except public ad minis tration
2.84%
180
84
Public administra tion
9.37%
593
191
Source U_S_Census. 2019: ACS 5-Year Est TablelD: S2405

Clinton County
Count MOE+/- Percent
547
38589
932
156
2-42%
2366
252
6.13%
4321
343
11.20%
1112
183
2.88%
3700
368
9.59%
1530
193
3.96%
0_98%
377
127
8_01%
3092
292
310
9.13%
3523
449
25.14%
9700
2780
276
7.20%
1697
215
4-40%
3459
348
8.96%

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 43

EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS
The employment forecast estimates the additional number of people living in a municipality employed in
the Retail and Non-Retail sectors (but not necessarily working in said municipality). Based on these forecasts
provided by the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission (see 2035 Long Range Plan for assumptions),
it is estimated that Bath Charter Township will experience an increase in retail and non-retail employment.
Clinton County is projected to follow a similar path in both sectors, exhibiting increased growth in retail and
non-retail employment.

RETAIL EMPLOYMENT FORECAST
Municipality
Bath Charter Towns hip
Clinton County

2015

Clinton County

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

387

392

397

401

405

410

415

5,366

5,531

5,645

4,737

5,846

5,958

6,072

NON-RETAIL EMPLOYMENT FORECAST
Municipality
2015
Bath Charter Towns hip

2020

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

2,157

2,260

2,336

2,409

2,480

2,553

2,624

26,672

27,397

28,063

28,702

29,368

30,049

30,745

*Tri-County Planning Commission, 2035 Long Range Plan (LRP)

�ECONOMIC PROFILE | PAGE 44

INCOME
According to the 2019 ACS data, the median
household income in Bath Township was
$68,313. This is comparable with the county’s
median household income of $70,390, and
is significantly higher than the state’s median
household income of $57,144.
The per capita income for the township was
$36,027, as compared to $34,920 for the
county and $31,713 for the state. The 2019
data indicated that the poverty rate for Bath
Township persons was 17.6%, which is higher
than both the county (8.8%) and the state
(14.4%).

MEDIAN
HOUSEHOLD
INCOME:

PER CAPITA
INCOME:
BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP: $36,027
CLINTON COUNTY: 		
$34,920
MICHIGAN: 			$31,713

BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP: $68,313
CLINTON COUNTY: 		
$70,390
MICHIGAN: 			$57,144

POVERTY
RATE:
BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP: 17.2%
CLINTON COUNTY: 		
8.8%
MICHIGAN: 			14.4%

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 45

NATURAL
FEATURES
Generally, due to Bath Charter Township’s lowland nature, much of the township is dominated by water
features, including wetlands, lakes, rivers, streams, and ponds. Management of the surface water directly
impacts the quality of drinking water within the township. Other important aspects of the natural makeup
of the township include relatively small elevation changes and a mixture of loamy wetland/muck soils.

TOPOGRAPHY
Topography refers to the characteristics of land in terms of elevation, slope, and orientation and is useful
in determining whether an area of land is suitable for development or agricultural purposes. Topography
relates to the intensity of soil erosion. The terrain and topographic characteristics of Bath Charter Township
are directly influenced by glacial activities from the past. In terms of elevation, the topography ranges from
795 to 920 feet above sea level, with the lowest areas being on the north township boundary and the highest
being on the Timber Ridge Golf Course in the southern portion of the township.
The majority of existing landforms in Clinton County date from the retreat of the last glaciers, about
15,000 years ago. Bath Township’s soil profile exemplifies this glacial heritage, with glacial till in the
township approximately 125 feet thick. The last glacial formation to occupy this area was the Saginaw Lobe
of the Wisconsin Glacier. More information on the glacial influence on Bath Charter Township can be
found in the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission’s reports, 208 Water Quality Management Plan
(1979), and Water Supply Paper (1973), among others. Patterns of deposition by the glaciers throughout the
township are complex, especially in the lake areas. The glaciers went through a series of advances, melting,
and retreats, resulting in a series of moraines, eskers, and small esker lakes.
The moraines run predominantly east and west, and are separated by till plains. Of particular interest
to Bath Township are the Ionia and Portland Moraines. The Ionia Moraine traverses east and west, and
passes south of Wacousta and DeWitt, through Gunnisonville and Bath, proceeding east to just north of
Shaftsburg. The Portland Moraine runs across the northern part of Bath, Woodhull, and Perry Townships.
There are several glacially-formed lakes and kettles within Bath Township, with Park Lake being the largest.

�NATURAL FEATURES | PAGE 46

WATERSHEDS
A watershed can be defined as land with presence of water, soils indicative of frequent and prolonged flooding,
and vegetation suited to handle flooding or saturated soils. Precipitation falling inside this area is delivered
to small streams or tributaries, which join to form rivers. Ordinarily, precipitation is redelivered to the
groundwater system, which is the main source of drinking water. It is important to ensure that local watersheds
are maintained to the highest quality as to allow for healthy drinking water and recreation water for fishing,
swimming, boating, and wildlife health.
Bath Charter Township is located predominantly within the Looking Glass River Watershed. In the words of
the Upper Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan (2017), “The Looking Glass River flows over
gentle, sloping land, with its tributaries and surrounding watershed extending from headwaters in Livingston
County to the confluence with the Grand River in Portland.”
The Upper Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan has seven main goals:
1.

Reduce or eliminate threat of human health hazards in rivers and streams caused by pollutants.

2.

Pursue restoration efforts of designated uses that are confirmed to be threatened or impaired.

3.

Assess watersheds for designated uses not currently listed as impaired. Restore these designated 		
uses where found to be threatened or impaired.

4.

Identify and offer protection strategies/opportunities for high quality areas in the watershed.

5.

Promote opportunities that the watershed can offer for recreation and wise stewardship.			

6.

Implement specific actions that enhance such identified recreation while preserving the integrity		
of the watershed.

7.

Identify land use planning measures complementary to watershed protection and/or enhancement.

A small portion of the township, south of I-69, lies within the
Red Cedar River Watershed. Both the Red Cedar and Upper
Looking Glass river flow into the Grand River and, ultimately, to
Lake Michigan.
Although Bath Township is experiencing increased development
pressure, there is adequate rural land which, when maintained
properly, can help maintain a quality groundwater supply.
According to the Michigan Department of Environment, Great
Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) and the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources (MDNR), “Priority water bodies within the
township include the Looking Glass River and the Vermillion
Creek,” both of which are impaired for reasons of ‘Untreated
Sewage’ and ‘Discharge of Pathogens.’ EGLE also cites that
helping restore watersheds requires eight (8) basic management
tools: watershed planning, land conservation, aquatic buffers,
better site design, erosion control, stormwater treatment
practices, control of non-stormwater discharges, and watershed
stewardship. This could be accomplished through the adoption
of a Low-Impact Development (LID) ordinance.

Lansing Area Watersheds

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 47

LAKES &amp; RIVERS
There are approximately 700 acres of waterbodies in Bath Township. Most of these are small ponds, but there
are six named lakes, the largest of which is Park Lake at approximately 181 acres.
Park Lake was named in 1826 by the original surveyor of Bath Township, Harvey Parke. During the years
of 1988-90, for a period of eighteen months, Park Lake was studied intensively by the Township. This study,
Park Lake, Phase 1, was financed by the Township, Clinton County, and the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources. In 2013, a project was approved to repair the dikes that control the water level on Park Lake,
allowing for improved water level control.
Park Lake is the only lake in Bath Township that has potential for recreational development. Information
presented in Park Lake, Phase 1 indicates that the lake is one of four lakes in the counties of Clinton, Eaton,
Ingham, and Shiawassee that have public boat access, with Park Lake being the second largest of the four and
the only one in Bath Township.
The other named lakes in Bath Township are Perch, Rose, Mud, Potter, and Fox Knoll Lakes. These lakes
are partly or wholly filled in, or lined with acres of cattail, and are generally inaccessible for recreational
purposes. Although it is not a lake, the reclamation area in the Schlegel gravel mine, south of I-69 in Section
19, qualifies as the fourth largest water body in the township, with approximately 24 acres. All of these water
bodies are in the southern half of the township.

MAJOR WATER BODIES

There are two major streams in Bath Township, both of which flow northward toward the Upper Looking
Glass River. These are Vermillion Creek, which snakes in and out of the eastern boundary of the township,
and Mud Creek, which generally flows north through the middle of the township. (See the Bath Township
Water Features map at the end of this chapter)

NAME

SIZE (ACRES)

PARK LAKE

181

PERCH LAKE

43

ROSE LAKE

30

SCHLEGEL MINE PIT

24

MUD LAKE

20

POTTER LAKE

19

FOX KNOLL LAKE

8

�NATURAL FEATURES | PAGE 48

WETLANDS
Bath Township is dotted by small wetlands in many areas and in some locations, entire
sections are covered by extensive wetlands. Rose Lake Wildlife Area, Potter Lake Area,
the Gardner Drain, and the Vermillion Creek floodplain area are all examples.
Wetlands, legally defined, must contain three essential ingredients: hydric soils,
hydrophytic plants, and necessary hydrology to support the plants. According to the
information compiled by the EGLE, Bath Township has approximately 15,858 acres of
wetlands. This translates into approximately 24.8 square miles of land, or 71% of the
total land area in the township. This number does not differentiate between regulated
and non-regulated. Most of the wetlands are in the northern half of the township and
contribute to the Upper Looking Glass River.

SOILS
Soil surveys are essential in determining the assets and limitations of an area. Soils act
as filters for rainwater improving the overall quality of our drinking water. Soils are the
basis of agricultural production in the township and can be credited for the extensive
amounts of wetlands in the township. In addition, certain soils can pose limitations
on development due to certain characteristic instability. Proper maintenance and best
management practices should be utilized in regards to the township’s soils.
The soils of Bath Charter Township vary widely across the jurisdiction, ranging from
loamy sands on the uplands to fibrous peat, muck, and soft clay in the poorly drained
low lying marsh areas. The extensive concentrations of muck are in the northeastern,
southeastern, and southwestern areas of the township. Mucky soils are regarded as
unsuitable for development purposes and should be approached carefully when building
on this soil type. The northeastern muck areas are traversed by the Gardner Drain and
the Vermillion Creek. The southeastern muck areas exist near Potter and Rose Lake.
The southwestern muck area is identified as the Chandler Marsh, a former lake bed
that is drained by the Remy-Chandler Drain. The Chandler Marsh is now occupied by
Chandler Crossings.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 49

AGRICULTURAL LAND
According to the current land use analysis
(Chapter 6), there are approximately 3,800
acres of agriculture land in Bath Township.
Almost all of the agricultural land is located in
the northern half of the township and outside
of the Urban Services Boundary (USB) (See
map on page 60-61). Agricultural land in
the southern half of the township has been
gradually lost to development over the last two
to three decades.

WOODLANDS
The majority of woodland in the township
is within the Rose Lake Wildlife Area. This
MDNR property consists of unmarked trails
and is open to hunting during regulated seasons.
Most other woodland in the township has been
lost to either agriculture or development.

ENVIRONMENTAL
CONCERNS
This chapter discussed the dominant physical
features in Bath Charter Township. Some of
the natural features require special attention

and management that must be addressed
in this Comprehensive Plan. Bath Charter
Township, according to Michigan Resource
Information System (MIRIS), is the largest
of the townships in Clinton County,
containing 23,351 acres, of which 1,138
acres is in a 425 Agreement with the City of
East Lansing and DeWitt Charter Township.

�NATURAL FEATURES | PAGE 50

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 51

TRANSPORTATION
ROAD SYSTEM
In Bath Township, there are four different types of roads. The Clinton County Road Commission classifies
the roads as state, primary, local paved, and local gravel. The differences between the four types are the
jurisdictions responsible for the care and maintenance, and the carrying capacity of each road. State roads
are operated and maintained by the Michigan Department of Transportation and are usually associated
with highways. M-78 is classified as a state road and I-69 classified is an interstate highway, both are located
in the township, totaling approximately 10.1 miles.

PRIMARY ROADS
Main roads are those that service multiple different townships, and are operated by the Clinton County
Road Commission. Chandler, Clark, Upton, Marsh, and Park Lake Roads are all Primary Roads that carry
traffic from multiple jurisdictions and usually are associated with higher traffic volumes than local roads.
There are approximately 26.1 miles of primary roads within Bath Township. Chandler Road, located on
the western border of the township, has become a heavily traveled primary road due to the addition of the
use-intensive Chandler Crossings multi-family units. Chandler Road also functions as a direct north-south
route from Bath Township to East Lansing and Michigan State University. Chandler Road is a route to the
127 freeway via Round Lake Road. Special planning is required for Chandler Road to ensure that traffic
pressures do not become overwhelming in the future development process.

LOCAL ROADS
Local roads are those that typically serve local residents and are maintained by the Clinton County
Road Commission (CCRC). The CCRC receives funding for local road maintenance from the State Gas
Tax (Act 51). In addition, Bath Township voluntarily contributes funds to the CCRC to assist local road
maintenance. The Bath Township Road Committee works with the CCRC to prioritize the maintenance of
local roads. There are 24.8 miles of paved local roads and 21.0 miles of gravel local roads in the township.

�MICHIGAN HIGHWAYS

TRANSPORTATION| PAGE 52

M-78 is a major east/west artery, which connects East Lansing to Bath Township, and allows traffic to flow
to I-69. It is a busy major arterial road and needs special attention when planning future development. In
2019, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) underwent a large redesign project on the
intersection of M-78 and Marsh Road. This project, which was done to mitigate severe accident issues, led to
the development of a J-turn at the intersection.

INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS

The major traffic artery in Bath Township is I-69, providing quick access to and from the township, with an
interchange at Webster Road and at Marsh Road. Much of the I-69 traffic is passing through the township,
but development along M-78 and Marsh Road in Bath and Meridian Townships has drawn traffic as well.
New roads, or any widening efforts to existing roads, must be built within specified right-of-ways. All utilities,
including but not limited to sanitary sewers, storm sewers, water lines, electric lines, telephone lines, natural
gas pipes, and cable television lines, are preferred to be placed within the right-of-way. Additionally, publiclyowned and maintained sidewalks, street trees, street lights, and utility poles should be installed within road
right-of-ways, or easements must be obtained from property owners. Not only does this make infrastructure
design marginally simpler, but it shrinks the affected areas when repairs are necessary.

ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION
NON-MOTORIZED

Bicycle traffic is considered with each new project, and the development of such pathways is guided by the
Township’s Non-Motorized Transportation Plan. Bath Charter Township updated the Non-Motorized Plan
in 2017. The Non-Motorized plan lists four goals with associated objectives. The full list of the non-motorized
goals and objectives are found in Chapter 7, but they state that the Township’s non-motorized system should
be welcoming and safe, that it should connect to non-motorized systems outside the township’s borders, that
creative and cost-effective non-motorized solutions should be developed, and that non-motorized solutions be
environmentally compatible and sustainable.

BUSSES
Bath Charter Township is served by bus services such as the Capital Area
Transportation Authority (CATA) and the Blue Bus. The Blue Bus is a
service provided by Clinton Transit. According to their website, Clinton
Transit is a public transit system established in 2001 that provides

curb to curb service to meet the transportation needs of passengers
in all of Clinton County. The Blue Bus is a demand response system
with busing running only when people have requested a ride. There
are no bus stops or regular schedules for any routes like larger fixed
route services, such as CATA. CATA has served the Greater Lansing
area since 1972 and was formed under Public Act 55 (1963). CATA
provides a variety of public transportation services in Ingham, Eaton
and Clinton counties. CATA’s fixed route service in the township is
limited to the Chandler Crossing area with seven bus stops located on
Hunsaker and Coleman Roads (Route 25) and one in front of The
Rocks apartments on Chandler Road (Route 26).

69

CATA ROUTES
IN BATH TOWNSHIP

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 53

COMMUNITY
FACILITIES
TOWNSHIP BUILDINGS
There are several public buildings in Bath Charter Township. The Township Hall was originally built in
1967, and it housed both the Township Offices and the Police Department. In 1995, the Township Hall
was expanded to add administrative offices to the front of the building. In 2005, the Police Department
expanded into its own office building adjacent to the Township Hall. On the same property lies the
Fire Department, Department of Public Works garage, and the Senior Center. Finally, the oldest public
building, the Community Center, was built in 1954 on Park Lake Road and is available to rent for events,
educational purposes, and community happenings.
In 2013, Bath Township officially opened
the doors to a new service center for the
community, the Bath Township Public
Library located in Bath Corners. The library
remains at this location. In 2018, Bath
Township voters approved a millage for the
public library.
The Bath Township Public Library provides
access to a selection of books, as well as a
pick-up and drop-off location for the DeWitt
Library. The library provides programs for
the community, meeting and study spaces, as
well as computers with access to the internet
and Microsoft Office.

�COMMUNITY FACILITIES | PAGE 54

POLICE SERVICE
Public safety is a top priority for Bath Charter
Township, where residents are serviced by Michigan
State Police, Clinton County Sheriff’s Department, and
the Bath Township Police Department. The Township’s
own local department provides a strong model for
community policing, with officers who are dedicated
to serving as friendly, familiar faces throughout the
township. They are assited in their efforts by a K-9
unit. As of January 2021, Bath Township had one
Police Chief, eleven full-time police officers, and one
part-time police officer. In 2020, the Bath Township
Police Department responded to 15,102 calls.

FIRE AND EMS SERVICE
The Bath Township Fire Department was first formed
in 1929, consisting of a host of volunteer firefighters.
Throughout the years, many improvements have been
made to the department. The fire station, redeveloped
in 2001, sits just west of the Township Hall on
Drumheller Road. The station is 9,987 square feet and
houses the Fire Department’s equipment: two rescues,
three engines, two brush trucks, one command car,
one water tanker, one light and air truck, two boats,
and one ATV vehicle that the Firefighter Association
purchased from donations in honor of Chief Eugene
“Bud” Rounds. The Fire Department has a full-time
Fire Chief and Fire Marshal, as well as eighteen paid
on-call firefighters. In 2020, the Fire Department was
dispatched to 1,072 Service calls, with just over 200
calls being fire-based alarms.
Bath Township Fire Department is also contracted
for EMS and fire coverage for the northeast corner of
DeWitt Township and has mutual aid agreements with
all fire departments in Clinton County. The ISO fire
protection rating for Bath Township is 6/9.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | PAGE 55

SCHOOLS
There are four different school districts that serve the education
needs of Bath Township residents. The primary school district is
Bath Community Schools, which serves the largest geographical
area in the township. Children in the southeast portion of the
township attend Haslett Public Schools. The southwest portion
of the township is part of the East Lansing School District.
Children in the northeast corner attend Laingsburg Community
Schools.
According to the 2019 American Community Survey, there were
7,952 children three years and older enrolled in school from
Bath Township. For the 2018 - 19 school year, Bath Community
Schools had 1,988 students enrolled in kindergarten through
12th grade. This includes 652 students at Bath High School, 698
at Bath Middle School, and 550 at Bath Elementary School.

RECREATION
The 2018-2022 Bath Charter Township Parks &amp; Recreation
Plan was updated and adopted on February 20, 2018. The
Recreation Plan serves as a guide to improve recreation facilities
and develop new recreational opportunities. The Recreation
Plan forms the basis to guide policy for implementation of
improvements and new initiatives that will meet the recreational
goals and interests of the Bath Charter Township community.

CEMETERIES
Two Township cemeteries exist, Pleasant Hill on Webster Road
comprising of five acres and Rose Cemetery on Upton Road
comprising of about eight acres. Historically, the first cemetery
to exist in Bath Township was the Cushman Cemetery (1839
A.D.), which was on Clark Road directly opposite the entrance
to Chandler Estates. According to Burnett’s History of Bath
Township, “a utility company working in the area unearthed
several skeleton bones.” The remains were subsequently moved
to Gunnisonville Cemetery in DeWitt Township.

�COMMUNITY FACILITIES| PAGE 56

WATER &amp; SEWER SERVICE
Bath Charter Township is part of the Southern Clinton County Municipal Utilities Authority
(SCCMUA). SCCMUA was formed in 1970 and subsequently purchased the existing wastewater
treatment plant of the City of DeWitt. Each of the participating Townships purchased a percentage
of wastewater treatment capacity which enabled the construction of the sewers for Bath Township,
as well as the large sewer main connecting Bath and DeWitt Townships to the wastewater treatment
plant. In 1980, a completely new wastewater treatment plant and offices were constructed by
SCCMUA in DeWitt Township. The capacity of the plant is ten million gallons of waste per day,
but treats an average flow of five million gallons per day. On average, Bath Charter Township
produces 650,000 gallons of wastewater per day.
The Township continues to update its sewer system and evaluate the need to perform repairs and
preventative maintenance. The Sewer Master Plan helps drive these decisions, and the Capital
Improvements Plan serves as a mechanism for funding some of the repairs and expansions.
Increased development in Bath Charter Township has created a demand for public water systems.
Municipal water is provided to sections of the township by the Lansing Board of Water and Light
(LBWL). This service is limited to developments in the Urban Service Boundary (USB). Outside
of that, water service is provided by private wells. Although most of the township still operates by
personal septic tanks, the southern portion of Bath Township where concentrated development
occurs is almost entirely connected to the municipal sewer. Sewer access is required in high-density
developments.

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN | PAGE 57

�FUTURE LAND USE MAP | PAGE 58

Mlp2:

Bath Cha-tar TcMnship:
futu'9 Land Use ,._p
n21.ill

D

n21:afc,"' "*"

.

..... GIii .........
nntt,:JJIII .._. UN
a.l11k•
•• 7 &amp;lhapt
IIIIIIID I &amp;It
M&amp;idK.llllfJ!!! • PIIII

:at:•• ..,. .

-

Cl&amp;!!!!

• A• Cl&amp;!!!!t! :l:A

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN | PAGE 59

�URBAN SERVICE BOUNDARY MAP| PAGE 60

Hath Oharter

Township 2022
Urban Servioo Boundary

Legend

c:::I Uman 5ef'!J.'ice 8ol!lndary
I I Bat h liowns!iap Parcels
- - 1--69 &amp;. Saginaw Hwy

- - Roads

N

1

0 D.250.5

--=:::::::1--• M•es

---===::::J

0

2,500

5JOOD
US Feet

�BATH CHARTER TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN | PAGE 61

Lansing, MI urb
within Clinto

2010 Ce

Round La

Cutler Rd

3

2

6

1

5

4

DeWitt

3

2

Howe Rd

Howe Rd
BR

127

Web
10

11

7

12

bR

8

d

9

10

11

127
Herbison Rd

15

13

14

18

17

16

DeW

15

14

26

30

State Rd

29

21

22

Wood Rd

Turner Rd

20

Stoll Rd

25

DeWitt Rd

19

24

Airport Rd

23

DeWitt Rd

27

Watertown Twp.

Grove Rd

22

Lowell Rd

Clark Rd

28

27

33

34

Lansing
34

35

36

31

23

BR

127

26

127
32

35

Sheridan Rd

Regulated Area (2010 Census)

D

-

N

Minor Civil Division
Lake/River
County/Intercounty Drain - Open Channel
County/Intercounty Drain - Enclosed
Main Road
Local Road

0

1
Scale in Miles

2

�LANSING URBANIZED AREA WITHIN CLINTON COUNTY| PAGE 62

banized Area
on County

ensus

3

Clise Rd

Angle Rd

Webster Rd

Herbison Rd

16

17

Clark Rd

19

Drumheller Rd 20

Bath Twp.
23

22

21

30

29

28

27

Upton Rd

25

Center Rd

Stoll Rd

Peacock Rd

24

18

12

11

10

Center Rd

13

Watson Rd

Witt Twp.

d

rR

te

n
Hu
12

1

2

Upton Rd

Center Rd

1

Chandler Rd

Krepps Rd

ake Rd

25

26

State Rd

East Lansing
36

31

32

34

33

35

36

Colem

an Rd

78

Source: Urban Areas derived from "Lansing, MI Urbanized Area 2010 Census" map
Basemap from Clinton County Drain Commissioner's Office (2015)

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006960">
                <text>Bath-Charter-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan_2020</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006961">
                <text>Planning Commission, Bath Charter Township, Clinton County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006962">
                <text>2020</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006963">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan 2021-2026</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006964">
                <text>The Bath Charter Township Comprehensive Plan 2021-2026 was prepared by the Planning Commission in 2020.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006965">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006966">
                <text>Bath Charter Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006967">
                <text>Clinton County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006968">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006970">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006971">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006972">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006973">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038239">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54850" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59120">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d887c3d9c895a949bb391a1d18d5c5b9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e5710cabc3a69c388c8e9c3d97ef9311</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010658">
                    <text>RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL STRATEGY
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP
AMENDMENT 11

Pittsfield Township Planning commission
Adopted August 9, 1979

�RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL STRATEGY
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP
AMENDMENT #1
1. Amend the Residential Strategy, page 15, by adding the following new item:
"7. Areas should be designated for residential buildings at
high densities, without limitation as to height, for persons
desiring high density living accomodations and buildings
with central services. such areas could be especially suitable for housing for elderly persons. such housing could be
incorporated into commercial and office centers in order to
create a mixture and balance of uses."
2. Amend the land use plan, Residential Uses section, page 33,
by adding the following paragraph after the last paragraph of
this subsection:
"High rise residential structures will be permitted within
the several commercial and office areas as designated on the
strategy maps, plates 3 and 4, for the purposes of providing
a mixture and balance of land uses in these areas, and to
provide housing which is conveniently located in relation to
commercial and office facilities. such residential structures will be limited to areas which have frontage or direct
access to one or more major arterial streets, as designated
in this master plan and which will have public transportation services.
It is preferable that high rise structures
also be adjacent to large public open space areas or community parks.
High rise residential buildings should be so located and
designated as to enhance the appearance and importance of
the major activity centers. These structures should not be
located within or adjacent to existing or planned
low-density residential areas unless these areas are part of
a plan for a planned unit development. High rise residences
may be used, subject to all the foregoing standards, as
transition uses between commercial or office areas, and
medium density residential areas."
3.

Amend Commercial Strategy, Section #3, page 17, as follows:
"3.
Multi and verticle use areas (including office and
residential) in the commercial areas are anticipated. High
rise residential buildings, including senior citizen
housing, are considered suitable in the three designated
commercial areas (see Plate 14)."
-1-

�Residential/Commercial strategy
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Pittsfield Charter Township

4.
Amend "Residential Densities",
following paragraph in the section:

page 40,

by adding the

"High rise housing facilities are not included in Table 1 of
this plan because of the uncertainty regarding location and
the relatively small size of the population that would be
included in such areas."
Motion made by Peer and supported by Wiedman to approve
the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
Roll Call
Ayes:
Nayes:
Absent:

Vote:
Woolley, Gates, Peer, Farrell, Wiedman
None
Morris, Cushing

Motion carried.

-2-

�(

(

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PITTSFIELD, TOWNSHIP

ELLSWORTH

COMMERCIAL
AREA

TEXT ILE

QC

...z

w
w

A.
QC

&lt;
u

...&lt;
...

w

11'1

BEMIS

COMMERCIAL STRATEGY

*
PLATE

4

Possible areas for high rise,
high density residential structures
(Master plan amended August 9, 1979)

,r

�(

-15is in the range of 40 percent low density (single-family detached dwellings); 20 percent in moderate density areas (such
as single-family attached, modular housing, townhouses and
mobile homes); and the remaining 40 percent in higher density
categories (such as townhouses, walk-up apartments, and highrise dwellings).
Agricultural Strategy
· 1. Since much more land is available for urban use than
will be required to serve the expected urban population of
1990, the plan will provide for interim uses and land use patterns which are reasonable in terms of land values and location
but which will permit later extension of sanitary sewer and
water facilities and other urban services, and development at
urban densities.
Orderly conversion will be emphasized so
that agricultural uses will be permitted, indeed encouraged,
as one interim use during the conversion period.
2. Designation of areas in the General Development Plan
for residential uses applies to an ultimate development condition.
Such designation will not preclude agricultural activities as interim uses during the period of transition from
rural use to urban development.
3. Agricultural activities include uses of land other
than for crops, including nurserys, game preserves and wildlife areas, hunting and stables.
Commercial Strategy
1. The Township will require compact, unified centers
for commerce and services in strategic locations at intersections of major streets and will discourage indiscriminate
scattering of these uses along major streets throughout the
Township. The Township intends to prevent strip commercial
development along major and secondary streets.
(See Plate 4.)
2. Existing commercial developments on Carpenter Road
and Washtenaw Avenue, at Carpenter and Packard Roads, and at
Carpenter and Ellsworth Roads, should be contained within
their present general development areas and should not be expanded in a linear fashion along the street on which they
front.
Existing commercial developments at Carpenter Road
and Michigan Avenue should be enlarged somewhat into adjacent
areas but should not be further extended along Michigan Avenue.
New general commercial centers should be located on Michigan
Avenue at Platt Road and at State Road, at the Ann Arbor
Saline interchange south of I-94, and on the west side of
State Road between I-94 and Ellsworth Road.

�AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSI\
1.

IELD AUGUST 9, 1979

Amend the Residential Strategy, page 15 by adding the following new item:
"7.

2.

PLAN - CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PIT{

Areas should be designated for residential buildings at high densities, without
limitation as to height, for persons desiring high density living accommodations
and buildings with central services. Such areas could be especially suitable
for housing for elderly persons. Such housing could be incorporated into
commercial and office centers in order to create a mixture and balance of uses."

Amend the land use plan, Residential Uses section, page 33, by adding the following
paragraph after the last paragraph of this subsection:
"High rise residential structures will be permitted within the several commercial
and office areas as designated on the strategy maps, plates 3 and 4, for the
purposes of providing a mixture and balance of land uses in these areas, and to
provide housing which is conveniently located in relation to commercial and office
facilities. Such residential structures will be limited to areas which have
frontage or direct access to one or more major arterial streets, as designated
in this master plan and which will have public transportation services. It is
preferable that high rise structures also be adjacent to large public open space
areas or community parks.
High Rise residential buildings should be so located and designed as to -enhance
the appearance and importance of the major activity centers. These structures
should not be located within or adjacent to existing or planned low-densit y
residential areas unless these areas are part of a plan for a planned unit
development. High rise residences may be used, subject to all the foregoing
standards, as transition uses between commercial or office areas, and medium
density residential areas."

3.

Amend Commercial Strategy, Section #3, page 17, as follows:
"3.

4.

Multi-and verticle use areas (including office and residential) in the commercial
areas are anticipated. High rise residential buildings, including senior citizen
housing, are considered suitable in the three designated commercial areas(See
Plate #4)."

Amend "Residential Densities", page 40, by adding the following paragraph after the
last paragraph in the section:
"High rise housing facilities are not included in Table 1 of this plan because
of the uncertainty regarding location and the relatively small size of the
population that would be included in such areas."
Motion made by Peer supported by Wiedman to approve the Amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan
Roll Call Vote:
Ayes: Woolley, Gates, Peer, Farrell, Wiedman
Nayes: None
Absent: Morris, Cushing
Motion Carried.

�SECTION 15/16 DEVELOPMENT POLICY
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP
AMENDMENT 12

Pittsfield Township Planning Commission
Adopted February 17, 1983

�Section 15/16 DEVELOPMENT POLICY
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP

1.

Land Use Plan - The land use plan is illustrated in Map 1 and
Table 1.
1.1

Residential Land Use - The southeast quarter of Section
16 (Residential Component #13), east of the railroad
track, and the southwest quarter of Section 15 (Residential Component #14) are designated for resideutial
use.
Two densities are designated - medium density
along the railroad track, the industrial boundary, and
the south edge of the landfill/future park; and low
density in the remainder of the area. The medium density
residential category includes single-family detached
and attached dwellings, two-family dwellings and townhouse units, at a design density of 6 dwelling units per
acre.
The low density residential category includes
single-family detached or attached units, at a design
density of 2.6 dwelling units per acre. In both categories dwelling units may be clustered.
Residential densities are summarized in Table 2. The
acreages and dwelling unit numbers presented in this
table are illustrative; actual numbers for development
approval will be calculated on the basis of information
supplied in applications for approval. However, Table
2 illustrates a basic policy of this plan; namely
preservation and protection of open space. Wetlands
(consisting of Houghton, Hoytville, and Pewamo soils,
as defined in the Soil Survey of Washtenaw County, Soil
Conservation Service) are not developable in their
natural state and are vital to the hydrologic system.
Therefore these soi 1 s are not to be developed and are not
to be included in the density base area used to determine
the number of dwelling units to be permitted. Wooded
areas not in the wetland
area are developable, but
township pol icy is to retain as much of the wooded areas
as possible. To encourage retention, the density permitted in such wooded areas may be transferred to other
developable land in the designated residential sector,
but at least 50 percent of existing wooded areas are to
be retained.
The residential area wi 11 be oriented in part to the City
of Ann Arbor.
However, the primary orientation is
intended to be to the south, to the future town center.

�2

1.2

Residential/Office - The 9 acre area along the south
side of Ellsworth Road presently contains four residences. These may continue as single-family dwellings;
they may be
converted to two-family dwellings
or
offices or the area may be cleared and medium density
residential uni ts ( two-family
townhouses,
etc. or
offices) may be constructed.

1. 3

Open Space - Four open space areas are designated. Three
are wooded areas located in the east half of Section 16.
The northernmost area, in the industrial sector, is 10
acres in area, and is intended to be preserved in its
entirety, since it is the only stand of trees in entire
385 acre industrial area. The other two wooded areas are
located in the medium density residential area.
As
noted in Section 1.1, preceding, at least 50 percent of
each of these two wooded areas is to be preserved.
The fourth open space area is the wetland/wooded area
along Morgan Road and the Swift Run Drain. This area is
to be retained as a preserve and groundwater recharge
area, and as a natural storm water retention area. At
least 50 percent of the woods in the north part of the
area should be preserved intact, with the maximum number
of trees in the remaining 50 percent of the woods also
to be preserved.

1.4

Landfill Site - The City's landfill site will be gradually filled from east to west. Upon completion, the site
will be converted to a major community park. Access to
the landfill operation will be limited to one drive from
Platt Road. A berm, fence, and landscape screen will be
provided along the south, west, and north edges of the
landfill site (in Pittsfield Township) during landfill
operations. The berm and fence will be removed upon
conversion of the landfill to a park.

1.5

Local Commercial - A small local convenience center of
approximately three acres is designated in the southeast quadrant of the Ellsworth/Stone School Road intersection.
The center is intended to serve the residential areas north of Ellsworth Road and the future
residential areas in Sections 15 and 16. The commercial
area should be developed as a shopping center and should
contain shops which provide for the daily, convenience
needs of nearby residents. Small offices may also be
included in the center.

1.6

General Commercial - An 8 acre tract at the southeast
corner of the State/Ellsworth Road intersection is
designated for general commercial use. This area is not

�3

expected to be developed in the form of a shopping
center.
However, the number of driveways should be
rninimi zed and the several lots should be con sol ida ted to
the rnaximim extent feasible.
1.7

Research/Industrial - The remaining 385 acres of the
planning area is designated for research and various
types of light and high technology industry. Development should occur in one or more park-1 ike settings with
the entire area tied together with an interior road
system and utilities, especially storm drainage. The
existing trees along the railroad right-of-way in the
south part of Section 16 should be preserved as a buffer
for the residential area to the east. A landscape buffer
strip at least 100 feet wide should be created along the
south line of the industrial area east of the railroad
to screen the future residential area from industrial
uses.
The research/industrial area should be developed in
large land parcels, so that the necessary common facilities, such as roads, sanitary sewer and water services, and storm drainage facilities, can be properly
provided. The area should not be divided into small,
unrelated parcels of land.
Each development parcel
should participate in its share of common facilities.

2.

Land Use Projections
2 .1

Residential - The designated residential area has a
capacity of 1,081 dwelling units and 2,469 people. {See
Table 2. Note - Residential Component #13 is the area
west of Stone School Road; Residential Component #14 is
east of the road.)

2.2

Public School Children - The number of public school
children which can be expected to be generated by the
residential areas {upon complete development) is presented in Table 2. The generation rates reflect current
experience in the Ann Arbor school district and are
subject to change in future years.

2. 3

Parkland - The basic parkland requirement in the master
plan is one acre of public parkland per 100 people. This
requirement consists of two components: 1/2 acre of
neighborhood-type playgrounds and 1/2 acre of large,
community parks. Since ample open space will be available in the residential area and in the future comrnuni ty
park to be created from the landfill site, only playground facilities will be needed in the residential
area, as follows:

�4

Residential
Component 13

Residential
Component 14

7 Acres
(1,458 People x
0.5 AC/100 People}

5 Acres
(1,011 People x
0.5 AC/100 People}

2.4

Employees - The number of employees which will be
generated by commercial and office uses in the planning
area will be negligible. For the research/industrial
area a reasonable employee/land ratio would be 10 employees per acre. On this basis the research/industrial
area would generate 3,850 employees.

2. 5

Vehicle Trips - The residential area wi 11 generate 8,648
vehicle trips per 24 hour period (vt/d), based on 8 vt/d
per dwelling unit.
(Residential Component
13 will
generate 5,168 vt/d; Residential Component 14 will
generate 3,480 vt/d.} The industrial area will generate
11,550 vt/d, based on a rate of 3 vt/d per employee.
Trip generation rates for the commercial and residential/off ice areas would be 200 vt/d per acre and 50
vt/d per acre, respectively. On these bases the commercial area will generate 2,284 vt/d and the residential
office area 466 vt/d. The total number of vehicle trips
which would be generated by the designated land uses in
the planning area, upon complete development, would be:
Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Residential/office

8,648 vt/d
11,550
2,284
466

22,948 vt/d
The trip generation data are presented on Map 2. This
map shows the number of vehicle trips per day assumed to
be generated by each area of land use and the percentage
of those trips assumed to be entering and leaving the
area through the indicated points.
The assumed distribution of vehicle trips on area roads,
projected from the designated land uses, is shown on Map
3. This distribution is based on the generation data
presented on Map 2, and on the assumption that 60 percent
of traffic will interchange with a land use area from the
north or west, and 40 percent will interchange from the
east or south. For example, the industrial area in the
southwest part of Section 16 has a projected traffic
flow of 3,162 vehicle trips. Map 2 shows that 60 percent
of these trips are assumed to enter and leave via State
Road and 30 percent via Morgan Road. Sixty percent of
the State Road trips are assumed to enter from the north

�5

and exit to the north, and 40 percent of the trips are
assumed to enter from the south and exit to the south on
State Road. Similarly 60 percent of the trips allocated
to Morgan Road are assumed to enter from the west and
exit to the west; 40 percent are assumed to enter from
the east and exit to the east.
The projected accumulated traffic volumes from the
designated land uses are shown at selected locations on
the existing roads.
These volumes do not include
through traffic on the roads.
3.

Transportation Plan
3 .1

Road Plan - The road plan is shown on Map 4. In addition
to the policies indicated on the map, the following
policies apply.
A.

State Road should be increased to four driving
lanes from Morgan Road north, with turn lanes
provided at major intersections. A traffic signal
might eventually be needed at Morgan Road.

B.

Ellsworth Road should be expanded to four driving
lanes between State and Platt Roads, with turn
lanes provided at major intersections.
Traffic
signals might eventually be needed at Stone School
and Platt Roads.

c.

Stone School Road should be paved between Ellsworth and Morgan Roads. Two driving lanes will be
required, with turn lanes at major intersections.
The road should be extended to the south to improve
the relationship between the future residential
area and the future town center.

D.

Morgan Road should be paved between State and Platt
Roads. Two driving lanes will be required, with
turn lanes to be provided at major intersections.

3.2

Public Transportation - Bus service should be extended
to the planning area as the area develops. The interior
road system of the research/industrial area should be
designed to accommodate busses.

3. 3

Pedestrian/Bicycle Paths - Paths should be provided
along Ellsworth, State, and Stone School Roads, and
throughout the research/industrial area. A path system
should also be developed in the Swift Run Drain Corridor, to provide access to the future park in the landfill
site, and to points north along Platt Road. The path can
also be extended to the south to the future town center.
Secondary paths should be provided from the residential
area to the central path.

�6

3.4

4.

Ann Arbor Municipal Airport - The Comprehensive Plan's
statements regarding the airport, as they appear on
pages 43 and 58 in the plan report, are still valid, as
they apply to Section 15/16.
The 5,000 foot, 10-28
runway presently being promoted for the airport directly affects future land use in Section 15/16. The f 1 ight
patterns that would result from that runway could have
potentially adverse impacts on the designated residential area (components 13 and 14), even to the extent
that residential might not be an acceptable use in this
area because of safety and noise problems. The Township's desired land use pattern should take precedence
over airport improvements - residential use in this area
should not be precluded or jeopardized by proposed
airport improvements.

Public Utilities Plan
4 .1

Sanitary Sewers - A trunk sanitary sewer should be
constructed along Airport Drain in accordance with
Alternate 2 of the "Airport Sanitary Sewer Study" prepared by the Township Engineer.
The Ellsworth Road
frontage sewer should also be constructed as part of the
Airport sewer project between State Road and the Airport
sewer trunk, to provide service to the properties along
the south side of Ellsworth Road.
Lateral sewers to
serve individual parcels should be provided by developers.
The airport sewer trunk and the Ellsworth Road lateral
will serve all of Section 16 east of State Road, except
the southeast 1/4, which drains by gravity to the south.
This area, and the southwest 1/4 of Section 15, both
designated for residential use (Residential Components
13 and 14 respectively), will be served by the Michigan
Avenue trunk sewer 1 1/2 miles to the south.

4.2

Water - A 16 inch water line should be constructed in
Stone School and Ellsworth Roads, between the existing
lines in Morgan and State Roads. This line will complete
a water service loop around Section 16 and will provide
service to the west part of Section 15.

4.3

Storm Drainage - The research/industrial area will
drain into the Airport Drain.
Retention facilities
should be provided within the industrial area to control
the water volumes in the drain. A series of retention
facilities to
serve the entire research/industrial
area, maintained by a drainage district, would be preferable to retention facilities on individual sites.

�7

The residential area drains by gravity into the Swift
Run Drain.
Retention facilities for the residential
area should be provided in natural low areas in the open
space corridor along the drain.
5.

Public Facilities Plan - Only two kinds of public facilities
are of concern to the planning area - public schools and
playgrounds.
Other facilities are or will be available
within a reasonable distance of the area.
The projections in Table 2 indicate an ultimate need of 330
elementary school student stations.
This amounts to approximately one-half an elementary school building. Because .
of the trend of reduced enrollments in the Ann Arbor school
district, and conversely, rising capacity in the district's
elementary schools, and the expected continuation in these
trends, no new elementary school facilities will be provided
in this area. Children will be bussed to elementary schools
which have sufficient capacity.
·
The projected need for junior and senior high school facilities is substantially smaller than the elementary need, and
the solution will be the same - bussing to schools with
capacity. There is no indication that a junior or senior high
school facility will be provided in this area in the forseeable future.
The projections in Table 2 also indicate a need for two
playgrounds in the residential area, one in each residential
component. A general location of the playgrounds is indicated on Map 1.
The playgrounds should be more or less
centrally located within each residential area, and part of
each facility can be located within a wooded area.

6.

Zoning Plan - The entire industrial area should be zoned I1. This district permits research and light industrial uses.
R-D, W-1 and PUD zoning districts could also be utilized in
special instances, particularly the PUD district, where a
park-like industrial or research development is desired. The
entire area should be zoned I-1 at one time, upon Township
initiative, prior to need, in order to eliminate potential
delays in developing industrial property.
The general commercial area at State/Ellsworth Road should be
zoned C-2, except the auto service station, which can remain
zoned C-3.
Only two lots remain to be zoned C-2; the
remainder of the area is zoned properly.

�8

The 11.18 acre parcel in the southeast quadrant of the Stone
School/Ellsworth intersection should be zoned C-1 and I-1.
Approximately 3 acres at the intersection should be zoned cl for the local commercial center proposed for this location.
The remainder should be zoned I-1; R-D would also be acceptable. PUD zoning would be acceptable for the entire parcel
and would permit a mixing of uses. Zoning of this parcel
should await a petition from the owner in order to eliminate
uncertainties regarding uses and types/location of zoning
districts.
The residential-office area should remain in its preser.t AG
zoning until a change in use is desired by a property owner
in that area. Appropriate districts would be R-2A, R-2B, or
0-1.

The residential area should remain zoned AG until sanitary
sewer services are available to the area. At such time the
preferred zoning would be PUD, to permit a mixing of housing
types and proper provision of open spaces.
The zoning plan is illustrated on Map 5.

�Table 1
FUTURE LAND USE
Section 15/16 PLANNING AREA

Land Use

Low Density
Residential
Medium Density
Residential
Residendial/Office
Open Space
Landfill/
Future Park

Area
(in Acres)

Percent of
Total Land Area

88

10.6

118

14.2

9

1.1

90

10.8

109

13.l

Local Commercial

3

General Commercial

8

1.0

385

46.4

20

2.4

830

100.0

Research/Industrial
Railroad Right-of-Way

�Table 2
RESIDENTIAL AREA PROJECTIONS
Section 15/16 PLANNING AREA
Residential
Component 13
(Section 16)
Gross Acreage

Residential
Component 14
(Section 15)

Totals

132 Ac

154 Ac

286 Ac

Low Density

36 Ac

52 Ac

88 Ac

Medium Density

68

50

Net Residential
Area:

Total

104 Ac

102 Ac

118
206 Ac

Number of
Dwelling Units:
Low Density

94 DUs
(@ 2.6 DUs/Ac)

135 DUs
(@ 2.6 DUs/Ac)

229 DUs

Medium Density

552 DUs
(@ 6 DUsLAc)

300 DUs
(@ 6 DUsLAc)

852 DUs

646 DUs

435 DUs

1,081 DUs

Number of
People:
Low Density
Medium Density

244 People
(@ 2.6 P/DU)
1,214 People
(@ 2.2 PLDU)

351 People
(@ 2.6 P/DU)

595 People

660 People
(@ 2.2 PLDU)

1,874 People

1,458 People

1,011 People

2,469 People

Gross

4.89 DU/Ac
(646 DU/132 Ac)

2.82 DU/Ac
(435 DU/154 Ac)

3.78 DU/Ac
(1,081 DU/286 Ac)

Net

6.21 DU/Ac
(646 DU/104 Ac)

4.26 DU/Ac
(435 DU/102 Ac)

5.25 DU/Ac
(1,081 DU/206 Ac)

Overall Densities:

�TABLE 2

Continued

Residential
Component 13
(Section 16)

Residential
Component 14
(Section 15)

Totals

Public School
Children:
Low Density
K-6

52
(94 DUS

7-9
10-12

X

0.55)

21
(52 children x 0.4)

74
(135 DUs

126
X

30
(75 children x 0.4)

26
37
(52 children x 0.5) (74 children
99

0.55)

51
63

X

0.5)

141

240

Medium Density
K-6

7-9
10-12

138
(552 DUs X 0.25)

75
(300 DUs

213
X

0.25)

55
30
(138 children x 0.4) (75 children x 0.4)
69
38
(138 children x 0.5) (75 children x 0.5)
262

143

85
107
405

Total Number Public School Children, both Residential Components:
K-6
7-9
10-12

339
136
170
645

�t1

a~
3 ·-

_scll

-::2

J
~

~
C)

-:::1..

~

~
2

j

- - -·-

\

~

0-

.:::I

�"

...

...

~...

...

~
V\

~
~II'\
~

i"'&gt;g

I,.-.,

{'y\

~

~~ 7/'YQ,(.s;..

~

\

J

~w
~

I('~

r::r=
,--m

....

--

\
\

--1

I
I

a.)

~

1/)

\

'

1

�zeu,o(h!J1o;

~

144?&gt;~~)
hi..

I I

l'IB'1~14'l"~

~ (4o1:} ~ °C4',~

"g\¢

~,,!

1'

11

II

4447.

i

r

A1Afll)~

,ff)~'(}

~5°W6 ~78

~

I

•-

I

I

(1,e,?o')

443~

, r " II

'lH
or

'1-Y l -

I

,,,-443~
1774

(401.)

.

------------

_ _ ___J

--.._

~

.~

_,

~'

.

\

I

,

I
I

I

I
I

II

4240

\

1

I

I

,,

/

...

'

' ~-------

I

I
I•

...

,,,-

11 ="38oB \

_J

~'17'lt

I

47Zb

-L------

/

•

£-U-:S°IA/b,

'\ -·..

l

Zf,(,/

~

35'48

1 - -~ - 4q"7

I

I

,'

4'115"

\
_,_---\

\

(3~)

f1,&gt;:!

I'.

111
t
r

\1l' --r
4IB7

1

3'?'30./i
-~

·· · ·

30q3/

·"l
lb75"
{~o7o) ,_,~ ,. {4r:t'/i,)

zs-12

~

/Al

-

-

It♦

X

II

- , .I -•(V"i:
- --,Y
_· ----

zqg~

I

I

~~
--

-

-

•

+--12DJ"ECTED
!12.\P D15n2.IBt.m0k.J

(\IE.HICLE. ~ \ P S ~ DA'-{-

-rt/d)

~/\t.iP ~

�•

"'

ij
~
V\

-~

. C:

.

•.

~

-.

"E

&lt;t

~

-~

2

·•.'-......

..
ul

.J

&lt;1
\.}

Vl

�~

~

\}\

~

I•

~

V)

~ I
''t j~j: __!f lr

I

i

/ ___ d I

I !Iii1

r

\()11 r-C-1.
,F ii" I

I

K'.-ZA, '2-2B,

0-1

i

I

,E&lt;-L.5""""71,'

@I /

.

..

.
.I-1t oe MIX OF=
I-11, T2-D,W-i.

...

J

a.PUD

/

----·- ··-------------- --1

(

AG j LAtt2 PuD

.

,

I

.
•

•1

.eo.

-

I
(Al&lt;-

..·

. . - ....

~11 ZD"-11~6 :PLA~

I

·---.

~I I

MAP 5

�.

~ : -:- ·- ·-

-

~

· · ~-

L~.,_,___.....-

.- T

-e1,_
- ::::-J:::' .:..-·

,--- ..

!,'• -

r·--- ~

1

cu •l!.

I

;

:..,.:1:- J:!
~

4

,e 7

!
I

32

M(IU 1TT

0

r===t1t==~~=:d,1I,/'
I'

1(~

RESIDENTIAL
COMPONENTS
Plate 8
Rev: 2-17-83

�-39-

Table 1
POPULATION AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES EQUIVALENTS
Residential
Cornponent
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
14a
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34

Gross
Acreage
220
151
225
233
38
22
222
229
140
373
84
330
132
154
80
109
276
152
152
210
162
207
260
185
157
163
10
37
33
91
90
129
308
227
1,137

Totals

Dwelling
Units
220
453
675
233
304
88
2,664
916
1,680
1,119
168
660
646
435
320
545
552
456
760
1,260
1,944
1,656
2,080
925
942
652
80
148
132
546
450
645
308
227
1,137
26,026

Population
Equivalent
660
1,359
2,025
699
760
246
7,459
2,565
4,704
3,357
504
1,980
1,458
1,011
832
1,526
1,656
1,368
2,128
3,528
4,860
4,637
5,824
2,590
2,638
1,826
200
370
330
1,529
1,260
1,806
924
681
3,411
72,711

School
Classroom
Equivalent (1)
4
7
10
3

4
1
38
13
24
17
3
10
12
11
8
8
8
7
11
18
24
23
29
13
13
9
1
2
2
8
6
9
9
7
34
406

Park
Land
Requirement(l)
3.3
6.0
10.1
3.5
3.7
1.2
3.7
12.8
23.5
16.8
2.5
9.9
7.3
5.1
4.2
7.6
8.3
6.4
10.7
17.6
24.3
23.2
29.1
13.0
13.2
9.1
1.0
1.9
1.7
7.8
6.3
9.0
9.2
6.8
34.1

Density
1
3
3
1
8
4
12
4
12
3
2
2
5
3
4
5
2
3
5
6
12
8
8
5
6
4
8
4
4
6
5
5
1
1

353.9

(l)Based on an actual population of 39,000 rather than the "density
population equivalent" of 74,875.

Rev. 2-17-83

�CARPENTER ROAD CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT POLICY
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP
AMENDMENT #3

This development policy for the Carpenter Road corridor as
designated herein was adopted pursuant to the Rural Township
Planning Commission Act (Act #168, P.A. 1959, as amended) and
constitutes an amendment to the adopted Comprehensive P1an
with respect to the Carpenter Road corridor. All statements,
data, and illustrations that are contained in this report
supercede and replace any statements, data, and illustrations
that are contained in the Adopted Comprehensive Plan as they
relate to the Carpenter Road corridor.

Pittsfield Township Planning Commission
Adopted July 19, 1984

�CARPENTER ROAD CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT POLICY
AMENDMENT TO THE CCJ,tPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP
AMENDMENT #3

1.

Objectives

1.01 The integrity and stability of the single-family residential neighborhood east of Crystal Drive should be protected. Future land uses,
buildings, and site developments along the west side of Crystal Drive
should be compatible with single-family residences.
1.02 Commercial and office sites should not be permitted to have vehicular
access to Crystal Drive.
1. 03

2.

Commercial uses should
be concentrated at the Washtenaw AvenueCarpenter Road and Packard Road/Carpenter Road intersections. Commercial strip development along Carpenter Road should not be permitted.

Land Use and Development Policies

2.01

The Carpenter Road frontage should be developed for office use between
the commercial areas at the Carpenter Road/Washtenaw Avenue and Carpenter Road/Packard Road intersections.

2.02 Office and commercial use may extend to the west frontage of Crystal
Drive if all the following conditions are met:
a)

The lots on the west side of Crystal Drive are combined for site
planning and development purposes with adjacent lots that front
onto Carpenter Road.

b}

Vehicular access to Crystal Drive is not permitted for any office
or commercial parcel.

c)

A landscape buffer strip, consisting of earth berms, trees, and
shrubs, is provided along the west right-of-way line of Crystal
Drive, and around lots #28-31 and #17-18.

d}

The frontage along the west side of Crystal Drive is treated as a
front yard for zoning purposes, and setback requirements for
structures and parking are applied accordingly.

e)

The buildings and site layout are designed to make the height and
overall scale of the building and the site improvements compatible with the single-family residential character of the
adjacent neighborhood.

1

7-19-84

�f)

Development is planned and approved under the PUD zoning district
regulations.

2.03 The lots fronting on the east side of Carpenter Road should be combined
with adjacent lots fronting on the west side of Crystal Drive and
planned and developed as one site, to provide sites of reasonable depth.
Lots that are adjacent (side to side) along Carpenter Road should be
combined for planning and development, to reduce the number of
potential driveway openings on Carpenter Road. Lots that are already
assembled under one ownership should not be separated into smaller
development parcels.
2.04

If the lots on the west side of Crystal Drive are to be developed
separately (in relation to the adjacent lots on Carpenter Road) the use
of these lots should be low density residential (single-family detached.) The adjacent lots along Carpenter Road should be used for
office purposes. In this situation, the office lots along Carpenter
Road should provide screening and plant materials along the corrmon
property lines, to buffer and protect the adjacent residences.

2.05

Commercial uses may be permitted in the area between Carpenter Road and
Crystal Drive, but only if they are located in the north part of the
development area north of Central Boulevard and in the south part of the
development area south of Central Boulevard, and if all the conditions
set forth in Section 2.02, preceding, are met.
Unless all these
conditions are satisfied, additional commercial uses should not be
permitted to develop along this segment of Carpenter Road.

2.06

Lots #71, 73-76 and 79-80, on the west side of Carpenter Road, should be
developed for office uses. The existing residences on Lot #71 may
continue, but conversion to or replacement by office uses would be
acceptable. Lots #49-51, presently combined with lots #79 and 80,
should be developed with lots #79 and 80 as one office complex. If they
are developed separately, the preferred use is multiple-family residential.

2.07

Lots #47 and 48, along Gross Road, should be developed for office use,
if the lots adjacent to the north are used for offices. If the lots
adjacent to the north are used for multiple-family residences, lots #47
and 48 should also be used for multiple-family residences. The two lots
could also be combined with lots adjacent to the south and/or east for
purposes of commercial development. However, commercial use should not
be permitted unless the lots are planned and developed in common with
the adjacent lots.
The existing residences may continue until
conversion or replacement occurs.

2.08 Lots #52, 53, and the south half of 54 should be ~sed for myltiplefamily residences. Office use would be acceptable 1f the entire area
were combined and planned and developed jointly with the adjacent lots
on Carpenter Road.
The existing residences may continue until
conversion or replacement occurs.

2

7-19-84

�2.09

Lots #59 and 60 should be developed for multiple-family residential
use, but the existing residences may continue until conversion or
replacement occurs. Office or commercial uses would be acceptable if
the two lots were combined with the adjacent office or commercial
properties and planned and developed in conjunction with them.

2.10 The existing single-family residential zoning classification in the
area between Carpenter Road and Crystal Drive should be retained until
specific development proposals are submitted to Pittsfield Township for
review and approval. This policy will permit zoning changes and site
plans to be reviewed simultaneously, thereby helping assure that the
objectives and policies of this plan will be implemented.
2.11

Planned unit development (PUD) zoning should be used to properly mix
land uses and to make certain that development proposals will be
implemented in accordance with this plan.

2.12 Gross Road should be paved when new development, with principal access
to this road, occurs.

3

7-19-84

�......... .
.~ .·.··
···6;···&gt;
:'

:-

___

-~

59

...

.

·,
.•.

..

..
~

..
...

----

- -·-·

' .. ,___ _.
I

._-

I

;'.

!'

78

79

o

I

:Zoo'

100'

I

I

I

I

J

i

~

~

~

i
~

I

I

I

~i

~

~'
~

,·

f

!

I

L

�I

I

H

AMENDMENT 414

NORTHWEST AREA PLAN
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP
WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Adopted by the
Pittsfield Township Planning Commission
February 6, 1986

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION:
I hereby certify that the attached amendment to the Comprehensive Plan of Pittsfield Charter Township was adopted by
the Planning Commission of Pittsfield Charter Township, in
accordance with Act 168, Public Acts of 1959, as amended, by
unanimous vote (6 yes, 0 no) on February 6, 1986.

Peer, Secretary
Planning Commission
Pittsfield Charter Township

�f

"

NORTHWEST AREA DEVELOPMENT POLICY
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP
PART 1
INTRODUCTION

1.01

Planning Area - The plan amendment covers the northwest
corner of the Township. The area is bounded on the west by
the Pittsfield/Lodi Township line; on the south by the south
frontage of Ellsworth Road and the road itself, east of Lohr
Road; on the east by the west edge of the Airport Plaza
development; and on the northeast by the 194 freeway. (See
map 1.) The planning area has a land area of 1,385 . acres or
2.2 sguare miles.

1.02

Existing Conditions - The planning area has at present, or
faces in the future, a number of significant conditions that
require detailed planning attention. These are, in summary
form, as follow.
a)

The area is close to the interchange on 194, and the
land closest to the interchange ramps is undeveloped.
The interchange will be a major factor influencing the
nature and timing of development in the planning area.
The interchange will attract commercial development.

b)

The planning area is located in a developing residential corridor between the cities of Ann Arbor and
Saline. Both cities, and Lodi Township in between, are
preserving the residential character of this corridor.

c)

The planning area has a strong orientation to the city
of Ann Arbor. Therefore, a strong community identity
should be established for residential development in
the area, to strengthen the relationship with Pittsfield Township.

d)

The interchange area functions as an entry to the city
of Ann Arbor from the south, and as a entry to Pittsfield Township and the Lodi/Saline community from 194
and the north.

e)

The area is subject to development influences of
Briarwood, as these advance to the west, on both sides
of 194. The planning area is the west terminus of the
Briarwood influence area, on the south side of 194.

1-1

�1.03

f)

Public water and sanitary sewer services can be
provided to the planning area (the area is designated
for services in the comprehensive plan adopted in
1976). However, there are significant limits to the
extent of water and sewer services in this area.

g)

The planning area has limited accessibility by surface
roads, because the 194 freeway blocks traffic flow
between the a~ea and the city to the north. As a
result, Ann Arbor Saline Road will be the ma j or access
route for the planning area, since it is the only road
that crosses the freeway. Therefore, development in
the area will create heavy traffic demands on this
road. The Lohr/Waters intersection with Ann Arbor
Saline Road and the ramp area to the north will be the
major traffic problem area.

h)

The natural features in the planning area present no
major limitations to development. Topography has a
definite pattern that should be respected, but slopes
are low to moderate. Drainage is available to all
parts of the planning area, but retention facilities
will be required to control discharges. Soils are
generally not a problem for development if drainage
facilities improve wet soil conditions in certain
parts of the area. Poor soil conditions are limited to
drainage corridors. These areas are small and provide
opportunities as open space features.

Purpose of Plan Amendment - This amendment is intended to
provide more detailed policies for the area than are contained in the adopted comprehensive plan. This amendment is
the fourth in a series of refinements of adopted policies
for critical areas of the Township. The Planning Commission
believes that the northwest area will experience substantial
growth pressure in the foreseeable future, and that detailed
policies are required now to cope with these pressures.
The current adopted plan designates the northwest area for
urban development and contains numerous policies that apply,
in a general way, to the area. This amendment uses the
adopted plan as a base, and elaborates these policies, or in
some cases, modifies them, to the particular circumstances
in the area. In the event of a conflict between this amendment and the current comprehensive plan as adopted in 1975,
interpretation should favor the policies in this amendment.
This plan amendment is the culmination of over one year's
study of the planning area by the Planning Commission. Five
working papers were prepared during the course of the study
to generate discussion and to focus attention on critical
issues. Numerous public meetings, in which public participa-

1-2

I

-~-·.....

�/-

,

.
tion was encouraged, were held on the study as it progressed to its adoptive stage. The Planning Commission considered nine alternative land use patterns in the process of
deciding on the policies set forth herein.
This plan amendment is intended to set Township policy for
the planning area for the foreseeable future. It will be the
basis for zoning decisions, development reviews, planning
and construction of water and sanitary sewer facilities,
road improvements, land acquisition for public purposes, and
other public improvements. The plan is detailed and i t attempts to anticipate future needs. Nevertheless, conditions
change over time, and changing conditions and experience
with the plan will - likely indicate the necessity of reviewing and possibly modifying these policies from time to time.

..'
1-3

-·

. . ...

�•

l'

.·,

•

·,ia~

i

t

III :

M

1·

·!
~

ii
ll

11
~

c:(

~
.-f

c:(

0..

c:,

c:(

zz
....

z

E

.

. '

c:(

0..

.

-~

. . L . --- -

---- ti:1~~~¢

.m

-

�PART 2
PROJECTIONS
The land use policies in this amendment result in the following
projections.
2.01

Land Use Distribution - The distribution of proposed land
uses is presented in Table 1. Residential land use comprises 73 percent of the planning area. Commercial and office
uses comprise 17 percent of the area. -Park land comprises
2.5 percent of the land area.

2.02

Residential Land Use - The designated residential area has
a capacity of 2,060 dwelling units and 4,300 people (numbers are rounded). Projections by residential component are
presented in Table 2.

2.03

Public School Child r en - The planning area could generate
as many as 1,200 to 1,300 K-12 school children by the time
the residential parts of the planning area are fully developed. However, the actual number of K-12 children at any
one time in the future will probably be substantially less,
because of the long period of time in which the housing will
be constructed in the area, and the cyclical nature of
household sizes and ages of residents.

2.04

Public Park Land - The projected population of the planning
area will require 35 acres of public park land when the
residential areas are completely developed. The park land
is divided into three neighborhood parks at five acres each,
and one community park at 20 acres. The requirement is based
on the comprehensive plan standard of 10 acres per 1,000
people. However, the requirement is reduced somewhat to reflect less demand for neighborhood recreation area by people
living in rural areas.

2.05

Employment - The office and industrial areas will be employment centers. These areas have a potential of generating as
many as 7,000 jobs, based on 40 employees per acre in the
office areas, and 20 employees per acre in the industrial
areas.

2.06

Traffic (Vehicle Trips) - Projected traffic, assigned to the
planned road network, is presented on map 8. The projections
include only additional traffic that wi~l ,be generated by
land uses in the planning area; they do ' not ' include existing

2-1

,

�•

J.

• , •

traffic on area roads or future increases in that traffic
that will be generated by uses outside the planning area.
2.07

Public Water and Sanitary Sewer Demands - The urban part of
the planning area will generate an average demand of 0.6 mgd
of water and sanitary sewer capacities.

2-2

J

�• J.

.

..

TABLE 1
FUTURE LAND USE
NORTHWEST PLANNING AREA

Land Use

Area
(in acres)

Percent of
Total Land Area

Rural
Residential

564

40.8

Low Density
Residential

326

23.6

Medium Density
Residential

59

4.3

High Density
Residential

67

4.8

Village Center
(Commercial)

21

1.5

Shopping Center
(Commercial)

35

2.5

Highway Commercial

41

3.0

133

9.7

95

6.7

9

0.6

35

2.5

Office
Research/Industrial
Rental Storage
Public Park Land

1,385 Acres

100.0%

Note: The land areas include rights of way of public roads •

,

.

�TABLE 2
PROJECTIONS BY RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT

~

"' ·
I

,.
j

'

i
,

RESllDENTIAL
COMPONENT

GROSS
ACREAGE

la

151

lb

GROSS
DENSITY

NET
DENSITY

DUS

1.0

0.7

103

40

6.0

6. 0

2a

52

1.0

2b - ·

88

3a

-.~
"'

POPULATION
CAPACITY

CHILDREN

2.6

268

103

240

2.2

528

120

0.7

35

2.6

91

35

2.5

2.1

185

2.6

480

185

19

6.0

6.0

114

2.2

251

57

3b

158

2.5

2.1

332

2.6

863

332

3c

80

2.5

2.1

170

2.6

442

170

3d

47

10.0

10.0

470

1.2 .

564

47

3e

20

10.0

10.0

200

1. 2

240

20

4a

180

1.0

0.7

121

2.6

315

121

4b : ..

181

1.0

0.5

83

2.6

216

83

Totals .

1,016

4,258

1,273

#

PERSONS
PER DU

K-12

I

''

I

2,053

�PART 3
OBJECTIVES

3.01

Overall Objective - Analysis of existing conditions in the
planning area, examination of current Township policies for
the area, and consideration of the various land use options,
result in an overall objective of creating an attractive,
comfortable residential community, primarily urban in character, in the northwest part of the Township.

3.02

This 9verall objective can be expanded into the following ·
specific objectives.
a)

The area should be developed in a timely and orderly
manner.

b)

The area should be developed primarily as a residential community.

c)

The community should be primarily urban in character,
but should blend in with the rural residential parts
of the Ann Arbor Saline Road corridor to the south
and west.

d)

The continuity of the residential character of the
road corridor north and south of 194 should be maintained.

e)

The community should have its own identity.

f)

The uses, design and character of the community should
recognize its location at the entry to the City of Ann
Arbor from the south, and its function as an entry to
Pittsfield Township and the Lodi/Saline community from
the north, especially from 194.

g)

Advantage should be taken of the proximity of the
freeway interchange to the planning area.

h)

Commercial and other nonresidential uses intended to
take advantage of the area's location and freeway access should be limited in location and extent so as
not to jeopardize the desired residential character of
the future community or of the Ann Arbor Saline Road
corridor to the south and the north of 194.

i)

The transition of the area from its present semi-rural
state to development status should be planned and managed so that the existing residences will be able to
adapt adequately and gradually~~ the changing condi-

3-1

�tions.

j)

A full range of urban services and facilities, both
public and private, should be provided in the community.

k)

The costs of developing the infrastructure to serve
the future community should be paid by developers or
users; these costs should not be borne by the taxpayers of the Township.

1)

Existing vegetation should be preserved as amenities
for the community~

.

..

3-2

�...
PART 4
STRATEGY

4.01

Introduction - This strategy is derived from the objectives
in Part 3 and analysis of existing and future conditions
and opportunities. The strategies in the adopted comprehensive plan are valid for the northwest planning area, although more detail is required in some instances, as described in the following statements. However, the housing
unit mix of 40 percent low density, 20 percent medium density and 40 percent high density units is not necessarily
valid at the . present time and is not incorporated into the
strategy and policies for the northwest area. (See f2, page
13, and #6, pages 13-15, in the comprehensive plan.)

4.02

Strategy - The strategy for planning and managing development in the northwest area consists of the following elements.
a)

A highway service (commercial) center will be established in the southwest quadrant of the 194 interchange and on the radio station property south of
Lohr Road. These locations will isolate highway service uses from residential areas and will help prevent pressure for strip commercial development along
Ann Arbor Saline Road.

b)

A sub-regional shopping center will be established in
the north part of the planning area, on the east side
of Ann Arbor Saline Road, close to the interchange.
The center will serve the southwest part of Ann Arbor,
the west part of Pittsfield Township, and the Saline/
Lodi community. The center will be required to provide
special landscape treatments opposite residential
areas, additional setbacks will be required, and parking lot lighting will be regulated to make the center
more compatible with neighboring residential areas,
and to create less intrusion into the residential
character of the Ann Arbor Saline Road corridor. A new
zoning district, permitting only shopping centers, and
tied to site plan review, will be created to assure
that only a shopping center will be developed at this
location.

c)

A village center will be established in the triangular
area between Waters and Ann Arbor Saline Road. The
center will be a mixed use area of commercial, office,
and residential uses, at a small scale, and will be
designed to provide a variety of activities. The center will be primarily oriented t~, the residential part

4-1
,

�of the northwest area and adjacent residential areas
in Lodi Township and Ann Arbor. The center will function as a transition area between the highway commercial area to the north and the residential areas to
the south.
The center will be residential in scale and design.
Drive-in facilities will not be permitted in the
center. The center will be oriented, in its interior
design, to pedestrian movement. Architectural review
will be required for remodeling of existing buildings
and construction of new buildings. Special architectural and landscape treatments will be required opposite residential areas.~ special zoning district,
based on PUD principles, will be created for this
area.
d)

An urban residential area, of varying densities and
housing types, will be established around the shopping
center and the village center to the west, south, and
southwest.

e)

A rural residential area with a density of not more
than one dwelling unit per acre will be established on
the south and west fringes of the community. This area
will provide a transition between the urban part of
the community and existing rural residential development along Ann Arbor Saline Road and future residential development to the east, in Lodi Township.

f)

A community park, approximately 20 acres in area, will
be provided in the central part of the planning area.
The park will be part of the Township's park system,
and will have areas and facilities for active and passive recreation. The park will incorporate the existing wooded area and stream corridor, to provide natural amenities in the park and to preserve natural features.

g)

Lohr Road will be used as the west edge of the Ellsworth Road industrial/commercial corridor. The right
of way will be developed as a divider and buffer between that corridor and the future residential area
to the west.

h)

Office development will be used as a buffer in the
north part of the planning area, west of Lohr Road,
between the residential area and 194.

i)

A new road will be constructed between Waters and Lohr
Roads. The new road will provide an alternate access
to Ann Arbor Saline Road and to the shopping center,
will reduce the number of turns
Ann Arbor Saline

on

4-2
I

,. .

-

�. '-

Road, will provide a physical separation between the
shopping center and the residential area to the south,
and will help integrate the various parts of the community. The road will be extended to the north, to
provide access to the northwest cor-n er of the Township and the village center, and to create a separation between commercial and residential areas. The
road will also be extended to the east and south, to
to serve as a collector street for the mixed use area
east of Lohr Road, and to provide an alternate access
to Ellsworth Road.
j)

Sanitary sewer service will be provided to the planning area from two connections to the Ann Arbor sewer
system. Initially, service will be provided to the
part of the planning area closest to 194 by one connection north of the freeway. The remainder of the
planning area that will be served will be connected to
the airport sanitary sewer to the southeast. The sewer
service area will correspond to the designated urban
area.

k)

Public water service will be provided to the planning
area by Pittsfield Township. In the early stages of
development, service will be provided by a booster
pump, a 16" water line extension, and an elevated
storage tank. Later, service will be provided by a
second (west) pressure district in the -Township. Water
service will generally be limited to the sanitary
sewer service area, but could be extended into rural
residential areas, where feasible, if needed for clustering of dwelling units in planned unit developments
and preservation of natural features.

1)

Existing drainage courses will be used in their natural state as part of the drainage system. Retention
will be required to stabilize storm water discharges
and to create amenities for the community. Drainage
districts will be established to assure proper long
term maintenance of drainage facilities.

rn)

Existing roads will be improved in line with traffic
projections and intended functions.

n)

Land development will be coordinated with provision of
public improvements. Needed improvements will either
accompany or precede development.

o)

Installation of infrastructure will be scheduled primarily on the basis of the occurrence of key land
development events, rather than on a preset time
schedule.

4-3
I

�p)

Land will be rezoned on request, based on the plan;
land will generally not be be pre-zoned. PUD or similar special zoning districts will be used when possible to coordinate proposed development with adopted
Township policies.

q)

Density transfer will be encouraged in residential
areas, for purposes of preserving natural features
and providing open space.

r)

Infrastructure will be financed primarily by developers and users. Density transfer will also be used to
compensate for dedication of land for public use, such
·as land for parks.
·

4-4

�PART 5
LAND USE POLICY

5.01

Residential Land Use - The major part of the planning area
is designated for residential use, which is consistent with
the objective of maintaining a primarily residential character in the Ann Arbor Saline Road corridor and the planning
area. Four residential classifications, based on densities,
are proposed: rural residential, with a minimum lot area of
one acre, with on-site water and sanitary sewerage facilities; low density, with a density range of 1 to 4 dwelling
· · units per acre (DU/ac); medium density, with a density range
of 4 to 8 DUS/ac; and high density, with a density range of
8 to 15 DUs/ac. All but the rural residential class of dwellings are located in areas that will have Township water and
sanitary sewer services.
The designated residential area is divided into sub-areas
identified as residential components. The numbering system
is based on the system in the adopted comprehensive plan,
Plate 8 and Table 1. The components are delineated on map
3, herein.
The rural residential areas are located along the west and
south edges of the planning area as a transition in density
between the urban residential areas to the north and east
and the rural residential area in the Ann Arbor Saline Road
corridor. The location of the dividing line between rural
and urban residential areas is based on the limit of the
Township water service area north of Waters Road, and the
design limit of the sanitary sewer service area south of
Waters Road. The primary type of dwelling unit will be the
single-family detached unit; however, attached single-family
units and clustered units on lots smaller than one acre,
with common open space areas, will be permitted, the overall density of one DU/ac is not exceeded. Residential components la, 2a, 4a, and 4b constitute the designated rural
residential area.
The low density residential area consists of three residential components - 2b, 3b, and 3c. The primary type of dwelling unit will be detached single-family units on lots
10,000 square feet or larger in area. However, single-family
attached and clustered units and smaller lot sizes will be
permitted if an overall density of 4 DUs/ac is ~ot exceeded.
In some parts of low density residential areas a proposed
road is the dividing line between rural and urban residential areas. In general, a road is the preferred separation
between these density areas, rather than abutting the two
areas along side or rear lot lines. Ho_w,e ver., · if water and

5-1

�sanitary sewer lines are installea in the road, both frontages of the road should have access to these lines, in which
case the separation should occur along lot lines.
Residential components la and 3a are designated for medium
density residential use. This category has a density range
of 4 to 8 DUs/ac and includes dwelling unit types such as
attached single-family, townhouse, patio house, and similar
dwellings. Component lb is intended to be a transition between the office and highway commercial areas to the east
and the rural residential area to the west (residential
component la). Access to the area should be provided by the
proposed road along the east edge of the area. Component lb
represents the northwest Jjmit of water service by Pittsfield Township.
Residential component 3a is intended to provide a residential area adjacent to the shopping center, and a transition
between the high density residential area east of Lohr Road
and the low density residential area west of the road. The
north boundary of 3a is flexible with respect to the north;
the area could be expanded to the north if office use is not
feasible to the extent indicated at the time of development.
However, the north boundary should not be moved to the
south, because the remaining area would be too narrow to develop properly, unless it is moved as far south as proposed
road B. Office use would be an acceptable alternate use for
component 3a i f demand exists for additional office area.
Access should be provided from the future road and not from
Lohr Road.
Residential components 3d and 3e are designated for high
density residential use, with a density range of 8 to 15
DUs/ac. The primary type of dwelling unit will be apartment
or condominium units in 2 or 3 story buildings. The areas
are intended to provide a mixture of uses east of Lohr Road.
Either 3d or 3e or both could be expanded in area if additional residential land is needed at the time of development. Alternatively, they could be developed with offices,
or a combination of offices and multiple-family dwellings.
The two components are located along a proposed road to
connect them with the residential areas and commercial
facilities to the west. Access to both components should be
provided from the future road and not directly from Lohr
Road.
Residential densities are summarized in Table 2. The acreages, dwelling unit numbers, and densities are illustrative; actual numbers for development approval will be calculated on the basis of information supplied with applications for approval.

5-2
J

�..

~

5.02

Open Space - The principal open spaces in the planning area
are stream corridors and wooded areas. The stream corridors
are designated to remain as open, natural drainage courses.
Their associated vegetation should be preserved as open
space. Ponds should be created along or in the stream corridors as amenities and storm water retention facilities.
The wooded areas should be preserveq to the maximum feasible
extent. Density may be transferred from the wooded areas to
open lands. Density transfer might result in a higher net
densities and attached dwellings, instead of detached dwellings. These changes are acceptable if the density limits
are not exceeded and the wooded areas are retained.
The wooded area in residential component 3b should be preserved and integrated with the neighborhood park proposed
for this area. The woods in the north part of residential
component 4a should be preserved and integrated into the
proposed community park. The wooded area in component 3d
should be preserved as part of the design of the high density residential development and should be integrated into
the neighborhood park proposed in this area. The park can
be a connection between the wooded area and the stream corridor in and south of component 3e.
The planning area contains a number of fence rows. Detailed
information regarding the type and quality of trees and
other vegetation in these fence rows is not available. However, the policy is to preserve the fence rows where possible, or at least individual trees or clusters of trees and
brush, where the development pattern can reasonably accommodate them. In particular, fence rows should be preserved,
and augmented where necessary, where they would link open
space areas or parks, as in residential component 3b. In
this case, the fence row extending east from the community
park connects with the stream corridor in component 3b. Also
in 3b, a short fence row connects the woods adjacent to the
proposed neighborhood park with the stream corridor.

5.03

Shopping Center - A 35 acre parcel on the east side of Ann
Arbor Saline Road, just south of the 194 interchange, is
designated for a community (sub-regional) shopping center.
The center would have a floor area of approximately 200,000
square feet and would be oriented primarily to the north,
to the city of Ann Arbor and 194.
The center should be contained in one building or in a
tight cluster of two or more buildings with a unified architectural treatment. Establishments in the center should be
selected and managed as a unit for the benefit of all tenants. The uses should be primarily retail sales, with offices and services that are supplement~!Y ' to retail opera-

5-3

�tions. Highway service type uses, such as gas stations, fast
food restaurants, and motels, should not be permitted in the
shopping center.
The site should provide common drives and parking areas, and
should be designed with the building(s) as one development.
Parking and drives should be arranged to provide safe and
convenient access to the adjacent streets and to the building(s) in the center. The parking lot should have landscape
islands and medians to channel traffic flows, to sepa r ate
parking areas from principal traffic flows, and to make the
paved areas more attractive for shoppers. Only one driveway
opening should be permitted on Ann Arbor Saline Road between
proposed roads A and ·B. A service area separate from the
parking areas and other public parts of the center should be
provided, and should be located and screened so as not to
intrude into the adjacent residential areas.
All edges of the center should be landscaped so as to create
an attractive setting for the center. The west and south
frontages should have additional landscape areas to make the
center as compatible as possible with adjacent residential
areas.
The image of the center along Ann Arbor Saline Road should
complement the entry character of its location. This image
should be achieved by landscape treatment along the road,
and substantial setbacks. Individual buildings along the
road frontage should not be permitted, in order to maximize
the landscape area along the road, to maintain the character of a "center" type of development, and to provide a
suitable transition to the residential part of the corridor
by preventing strip commercial development along the road.
Outside lighting should be of a type and height that will
be compatible with the future residential areas.
The shopping center should have vehicular connections with
the office and highway commercial areas to the east and
northeast.
5.04

Village Center - A village center is designated for the
triangular area between Ann Arbor Saline Road, Waters Road,
and proposed road B. The village center should be a specialty commercial center and should have the following characteristics.
a)

The center should have a residential scale and appearance, to be derived from residentially sized structures, roof lines, proportions, window and door details, exterior finish materials, and similar treatments. Existing residential structures could be used,

5-4

�and expanded or connected with adjacent structures.
Maximum height should be limited to two floors.
b)

Individual parcels should be assembled where possible;
otherwise each parcel's development and use should be
coordinated with the development and use of the other
parcels.

c)

A unified architectural and site design theme should
be established for the entire center. Landscape
treatment should be consistent with this theme and
should help implement it. The center should have a
carefully designed grouping of shops and other build. ings, -intended tb .create a special experience for :
shoppers; and to create a sense of discovery, entertainment, and adventure through spatial relationships,
architectural and landscape treatments, and pedestrian circulation patterns. The center should be oriented
to pedestrians, with common pedestrian areas such as
plazas, courtyards, and paths. Signage should be consistent with the theme and character of the center.

d)

Common parking and driveways should be provided. Parking and loading areas should be screened and well
landscaped. Existing parcels fronting on Ann Arbor
Saline Road should combine drives; where combination
is not possible, access to the road should be limited
to not more than one drive for each current lot. Access to Waters Road should be similarly restricted.
Access to proposed road B should be limited to common
driveways.

e)

Uses in the center should be small shops, able to
utilize floor areas not larger then 1,500 to 2,500
square feet. Uses considered appropriate would be
shops offering gifts, handcrafted items (including
those made on the premises), luxury merchandise,
boutique fashion items, imported goods, art galleries,
specialty restaurants and food shops, personal service
offices, and dwelling units as part of offices or
shops. The tenants should be primarily local and independent. The center should not have a large anchor
store; the variety of small shops and the character
and atmosphere of the center should be the principal
means of attracting people to shop there.

f)

Design review procedures by the Township should be
established to ensure that the architectural and site
characteristics intended for the center will be
achieved.

g)

Fast food chain restaurants and similar highway commercial uses and drive-through facilities should not

5-5
. ff-

�. '

be permitted in the center. These uses and facilities
are not consistent with the intended character and
atmosphere of the center, or with its pedestrian orientation.
5.05

Highway Commercial - Two highway commercial areas are designated in the plan. The larger area is adjacent to the east
bound exit ramp of 194, north of Waters Road. Access to this
area should be limited to a road or common drive between the
commercial area and the office area to the .west. The second
area is located east of Ann Arbor Saline Road and south of
Lohr Road, on the radio station property. Access to this
area should be limited to realigned Lohr Road; access to .
existing Lohr Road should not be permitted.
Typical uses will be motels, restaurants, including fast
food chain establishments with drive-through facilities,
and auto services (gas stations and minor repairs). Each
area should be developed according to an overall plan.
Commercial signs should not be permitted in the entry zone.
(See 5.08, herein.)

5.06

Offices - Four office areas are designated in the plan. The
office area east of residential component lb should have
access from proposed road Band from a road or common drive
between the office and highway commercial areas. The office
area east of the shopping center should have access from
Lohr Road (the north-south segment) and should have vehicular connections with the shopping center. These two office
areas should be developed with general administrative, professional, business, and personal service offices in a planned, office park setting.
The office area east of Lohr Road, north of residential
component 3d is intended for general office uses that would
be compatible with neighboring medium and high density
residences. The office area south of residential component
3e is intended to have general office uses or a combination of office and research operations. This area should be
developed as an office park according to an overall plan.
The plan for the park should be organized around the open
space corridor associated with the drainage course. Access
to the area should be provided by proposed road B.

5.07

Industrial Uses - The plan designates two industrial areas
in the same general location - one is east of proposed road
B, and the second is located along the - east side of Lohr
Road. The first area is intended to be similar in use and
character of development to Airport Plaza adjacent to the
east. It should be developed as an ind~~ttial park, with

5-6

�access from proposed road B. The second area should be primarily office, research, and development in a planned, park
type setting. Alternatively, it could be an extension of the
area adjacent to the east. The area could also be a mixture
of medium and high density dwellings, or a medium density
residential complex. If the area is to be developed as a
mixed used area, similar to Airport Plaza, or if it is to
have offices or light industrial uses, a substantial landscape buffer should be provided along the Lohr and Ellsworth
Road frontages to separate the area from the neighbor ing
residential areas.
·
5.08

Entry Zone - The intersection of Waters/Lohr Road with Ann
Arbor Saline Road, and the area between the intersection and
the ramps in the south part of the interchange, is an entry
for Pittsfield Township and the planning area from the
north. It is also part of the entry for the city of Ann
Arbor from the south. Therefore, this area should convey a
desirable image of both municipalities. The predominant
character in the Ann Arbor Saline Road corridor, on both
sides of 194, is intended to be residential, even though the
area immediately south of the interchange will be commercial
in use. The entry zone should soften the commercial character of the interchange area and create a transition to the
residential areas. The entry zone should feature substantial
landscaped setbacks, and should be free of development, including signs and other forms of commercial advertising.
Highway commercial uses may be visible from the interchange
ramps but should be oriented away from the entry zone.

5.09

Image Along 194 - The appearance of development in the planning area from 194 conveys important images of Pittsfield
Township and the city of Ann Arbor. Therefore, the frontages along the freeway right of way should be considered as
front yards, in terms of zoning setback -requirements, and
should be landscaped accordingly. Existing trees along the
freeway right of way should be preserved. Views of parking
and service areas from the from the freeway should be softened by landscaping.

5-7
,

--

--~

-..-

...--

,--.,,.~ --,e

:ass•

�,...,.,

.

... - . -,

EISE

..

.. .

I

p

:•

.,....:

..
:.

C:,~ Tc.-e.. I

~tfU{)..l

i·

I

, _[J

I

ir
&lt;

MAP 2
lAND USE PLAN
i

. : _.

i

t- :'" -•

~_
___J -_____}. ~-·r_,::~::--~ ·- -~~-~~I~_:_ -:: ·_:; -_ -~ A N_ ARBOR LuN1c1PAL
t.
:;;;;:~~~;=.::;:, ~-~, ~~~~~~r~..,..........
t

•

I

�M

..

i'

...

I t I

l 'll'I

I

-- - -, -----

1b
EISE

fT

4b
□

j
. -

.\

'

I

MAP. 3
-:-~~ESIDENTIAL-- CCl-1PONENTS
_t--~-~ - ,j: ·_--=-=

• I

.. ,·- •i

. •, · .

t :

~&gt;'-~-~.__ -~ , ,:·-&gt; ~]r ~:~;-.. \'.

- -- - - - - - - -

.. - -

. --· _

.... l

•

-

N .ARBOR

-- ·
'dil

UNICIPAL
- -lilt

i-, &amp; Jit► &amp; W

�PART 6
PUBLIC FACILITIES POLICIES

Public Schools - The planning area could generate as many as
as 1,300 K-12 public school children, based on the projected
capacity of the designated residential areas. The plan is
based on the assumption that all students will be bussed to
school facilities in the school district. Therefore, no future school sites are designated in the planning area.
·
6.02

Public Recreation Areas - The planning area wil1 require 35
acres of public recreation land when fully developed, based
on the standard of 10 acres of recreation land per 1,000
people. The recreation area should be divided into three
neighborhood parks, each at five acres in size, and one community park at 20 acres in size. The neighborhood parks
should be located in the urban residential areas, as centrally located in the service area of each park as possible.
(The service area is defined by a radius of 3/4 mile from
the park.) Each park should be generally accessible to the
neighboring rural residential area as well.
One neighborhood park should be located in the high density
residential area east of Lohr Road, to serve residential
components 3d and 3e. A neighborhood park should also be
located west of Lohr Road, in residential component 3b,
adjacent to the woods in the southeast part of that area.
This park would serve all of residential components 3a, 3b,
3c, and the east parts of 4a and 4b.
The third neighborhood park should be located in the north
part of the planning area. Two locations are possible for
this park: 1) in the northwest corner of residential component 2b, and 2) in the central part of residential component
lb, where it could be integrated with the existing wooded
area. The latter location offers more natural features and
character, whereas the former is more centrally located with
respect to the urban residential area.
The community park should be located as centrally as possible with respect to residential parts of the planning area,
and also where natural features are available for passive
recreation activities. A location in the north central part
of residential component 4a, adjacent to 3b, meets both
criteria. A park in this location could incorporate a wooded
area (3 to 4 acres) in its northeast corner and the stream
corridor along its south edge.
Each park should have at least one frontage on a public
street for good access and to expose tne parks to the com-

�munity view.

6.03

Police Protection - The Pittsfield Township Department of
Public Safety will provide police protection to the planning
area. The area will be served initially by the west patrol
district, which also serves the rural parts of the Township.
At some future time, as the planning area develops, especially the residential parts, the patrol districts will be
realigned, in order to concentrate police services in the
northwest area. The planning area will be served out of the
main police station at Michigan and Platt, as will the remainder of the Township. Police substations are not contemplated fo;r the any -par_t of the Township.

6.04

Fire Protection - The planning area can be adequately served
by fire protection services out of a substation located in
the old main station at the Township Hall. The substation
will require remodeling of the old station and purchase of
one pumper truck, to be stationed at this location. The substation will not require additional full time personnel, but
additional volunteer fire fighters will be recruited in the
residential parts of the planning area, as these develop.

-6-2

. - ---- . .., __ _
'

�,..,,,,

I
----

EISE

4bj
.

. I

□

�...
PART 7
PUBLIC UTILITIES POLICIES

7.01

Sanitary Sewer Service - The north part of the planning area
will be the phase 1 sewer service area. It will be served by
by a 15" - 18" trunk sewer that will connect to the City's
sewer system at the west loop road in Briarwood. The sewer
will be stubbed to the south on Lohr Road, and to th~ west
on Waters Road ., to provide for future service to the southeast and northwest parts of the planning area.
The phase 2 service area will · be . served by the third stage ·
of the Airport sanitary sewer project. This stage involves
construction of an 18" sewer across the north part of the
Airport, south of the hangars and parallel to Ellsworth
Road. The sewer will be extended to the north and west into
the phase 2 area. (See map 5, herein.)
Omission of the west and south edges of the planning area
from the sewer service area is intended to accomplish several purposes. First, it keeps the total amount of effluent
discharge from the planning area within the range of volumes
assumed for the area in the sewer contract with the city of
Ann Arbor. Second, the policy recognizes the limits in the
northwest corner of the Township for water service by the
Township's water supply system. Third, this policy supports
rural residential densities in these areas, and thereby, a
gradual transition between the urban residential part of the
planning area and the rural residential areas adjacent in
Lodi Township.

7.02

Water Service - The combined sanitary sewer service areas
(phases 1 and 2) will also constitute the area that will be
served by the Township's water system. Improvements necessary to serve the urban part of the planning area consist
of a booster station at Platt and Morgan Roads, and a 16"
water main constructed west from the southwest corner of the
Airport Plaza development to lohr Road, thence north and
west to Ann Arbor Saline Road.
It should be noted that the water system, so far as the
booster station and 16" water main are concerned, will not
be phased and could serve the phase 2 sewer service area at
the same time as the phase 1 area. However, as a matter of
policy, water service will not be provided to the phase 2
sewer service area until sanitary sewer service is available
to that area.
It should also be noted that providing water service to any
part of the planning area from the cit~ of _Ann Arbor is not

7-1

�feasible for two reasons: 1) the city will only extend
water to this area on a short term basis, such as five to
ten years; and 2) the Township's water contract with YCUA
requires YCUA approval of a connection to a second source
of water, such as the city. A request for permission to make
such a connection has been denied.
As discussed herein, urban development in the planning area
requires construction only of the booster station and the
16" main. Three other major improvements in the water system
- a 7504000 gallon .elevated storage tank in the northeast ·
corner of the planning area, a 24" transmission main along
Merritt Road, and a 2 million gallon ground storage tank in
the vicinity of State and ~i~higan - ·will eventu~lly be
required to provide adequate quantities and pressure of
water throughout the service area. The need for these
improvements is not attributable to development in the
planning area; these improvements will be needed even if
urban development does not occur in the planning area.
Water service might be extended to rural residential developments in the planning area, if necessary for clustering of
dwellings for purposes of retaining open space and natural
features. Decisions to extend water in these situations will
be made on a case by case basis, at the time of development
review.
Water service cannot be provided by the west pressure district above the 940 foot elevation, because of low water
pressure at higher elevations and the pressure range limits
in the district. The extreme northwest corner of the planning area is higher than 940 feet; therefore water service
cannot be provided to this area by Pittsfield Township out
of the west pressure district. This area is therefore designated for rural residential use, with on-site wells and
septic tanks/drainfields.
7.03

Storm Drainage - The north part of the planning area drains
to the north and east, under the freeway, into the drainage
system in and around Briarwood. The remainder of the planning area drains to the south and southeast by several
drainage courses, which eventually discharge into the Rouse
and Wood Outlet drains, then into the Saline River. These
open drainage courses should be used as the principal
drainage courses in the planning area. These courses should
be retained as primarily natural features, but should be
improved where necessary to accommodate drainage flows. Such
improvements should supplement and respect the natural character of the drainage corridors. Retention facilities should
be provided on individual sites or as common facilities to
protect the drainage courses from flooding and sedimentation.
. \

________________ _____

7-2

,..,...,.__,,.,.,,,.,,,._,,,

�• f I I I I 11
=-:c= t =-i:::!::Q

I

-

-

6

I

~e1.

--

s~

l~

serwiu_A~ea..
'

TEf,S

EISE

.

W

... ..

.

...... - -

...

.

r

TIT

I

I.
~

!

I

-I

I

I

I
1·

I I
.!

D

□
MAP 5
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PLAN

. ,.

, ..

,·

\

• I

i

':

'.

C

�,...,,,,
•. f 1 I I t I

EISE

I

~(L
lliiit---~

rr
...J,

, -.........
-""T....
"IC'".,...--,.....,
_ __,
.....,....
....._-_-.....

I
J

' I
::=====:::=:::;:::========
. l~=:::=:::===lt~=::::::::;:::=:::!~~~~2:::ciL53:!l:D;=J:~~J;;;Sia=::

-----ti

L

□
MAP 6

WATER SERVICE PLAN

.

. \

.

I

:_,~J

AL- :R~OR ~UN/CIPAL

�PART 8
TRANSPORTATION POLICIES

8.01

Road Plan - The plan for roads in the planning area is illustrated on Map 7. The following detailed policies apply.
a)

Ann Arbor Saline Road - The road will continue to be
designated as a major arterial road. The minimum
· right of way should be 120 fe~t through the planning
area. The road should be widened to four driving
lanes, with additional turn lanes provided at major
intersections. Access to adjacent ·properties should
be limited to intersecting streets, so that a fifth,
center turn lane will not be needed for the entire
length of the road in the planning area. However, a
center turn lane will be required in the segment of
the road south of the Waters/Lohr intersection, because the existing lots on the west side of the road
already have individual driveway openings on the road.
The five lane section should extend through the intersection with the proposed new road south of the shopping center and village center (road B).

b)

Maple Road - Maple Road should be developed as a major
arterial road between Ann Arbor Saline Road and the
city of Saline. The road should be paved, two lanes,
and should be the primary access between Saline and
194 and Ann Arbor.

c)

Ellsworth Road - The road should be developed as a
major road east from Ann Arbor Saline Road. The road
should be paved, two lanes wide; widening to 4 lanes
east of the proposed road B to State Road and beyond
will eventually be required.

d)

Lohr Road - Lohr Road should be developed as a secondary arterial south of proposed road B, with a right of
way of 120 feet. Between proposed road Band Ann Arbor
Saline Road it should be developed as a collector
road, with a right of way of 86 feet. The road should
be paved, two lanes, with additional lanes at major
intersections, as necessary.

e)

Waters Road - Waters Road should be developed as a
secondary arterial west of the realigned intersection
at Ann Arbor Saline Road. The right of way should be
120 feet and the road should be paved, two lanes.
Turning lanes should be provided at major intersections.

f)

Waters/Lohr Intersection - The e~~sting intersection

S-1

�with Ann Arbor Saline Road . has two major deficiencies
in view of the large traffic volumes that are projected for Ann Arbor Saline Road: 1) the roads intersect
at a poor angle, in terms of sight lines and ease of
turning; and 2) the intersection is located only 400
feet from the south ramps in the 194 interchange.
These two conditions will interfere with traffic flow
through the interchange area and, more seriously, with
turns between the interchange ramps and Ann Arbor
Saline Road.
The situation can be improved by constructing a new
road, identified as road A on map 7, as a relocation
of the Waters/Lohr intersection south of the existihg
intersection. This plan consists of the following
elements. (The concept is illustrated .on map 9.)
1)

Construct a new road (A) between Waters and Ann
Arbor Saline Roads as a two way public road,
intersecting Waters Road opposite the southwest
corner of the designated highway commercial area.
This road will provide traffic leaving the highway commercial area with access to Ann Arbor
Saline Road and the 194 interchange.

2)

Waters Road, between Ann Arbor Saline Road and
road A, will be converted to one-way west bound
traffic flow. The road will be paved, two lanes.

3)

Road A will be aligned to the south, to intersect
Ann Arbor Saline Road at the northwest corner of
of the designated shopping center; will cross the
north end of the shopping center site; and will
connect with the existing Lohr Road just west of
the rental storage area.
An alternate alignment, east of Ann Arbor Saline
Road, could be south of the east-west segment of
Lohr Road, either between the rental storage and
office areas, or further south, through the
office area. In any case, the location of the
intersection with Ann Arbor Saline Road would not
change. In these alternates, Lohr Road north of
the new east-west alignment could be vacated,
except to the extent necessary to provide access
to the rental storage area.

4)

Existing Lohr Road will be vacated between the
connection point with road A and Ann Arbor
Saline Road.

5)

Road A will provide vehicular access to the proposed shopping center and t!l~ designated highway

8-2

J

�commercial area to north from Ann Arbor Saline
Road. No other direct access will be permitted
on the east side of Ann Arbor Saline Road, between the interchange and proposed road B, except
one two-way driveway for the shopping center, if
located at suitable distances from the intersections of proposed roads A and B with Ann Arbor
Saline Road. The only permitted access to the
highway commercial area northeast of the shopping center will be from road A. Similarly, road
A and Waters Road will provide access to the
village center. Direct access to the village
center from the Ann Arbor Saline Road will not be
permitted between the interchange and road A.
g)

h)

Proposed Road A - This new road is generally described
in item f), preceding. The road should be a public
road, with a right of way of 66 feet. Two through
lanes should be sufficient, especially east of Ann
Arbor Saline Road, although turn lanes might be necessary at major intersections. The road could be extended north as a private drive or public road, to provide
the principal access to the highway commercial area,
and a second access to the designated office area to
the west. Road A, together with its northerly extension, will also provide a vehicular connection among
the office and highway commercial areas, the village
center, and the shopping center.
Proposed Road B - Road B should be developed as a
major collector road from its intersection with
proposed road C north of Waters Road, in residential
component la, and Ellsworth road, east of Lohr Road.
The right of way should be 86 feet. Two lanes should
be sufficient north of Waters Road; 3 to 4 lanes will
be needed in the area between Waters and Ann Arbor
Saline Roads, because of the large number . of turns
that will likely occur in this area. Four or 5 lanes
will eventually be needed between Ann Arbor Saline
Road and the shopping center drive opening. Two
through lanes should be sufficient east and south to
Ellsworth Road, with turn lanes at major intersections. The road is intended to provide the principal
access to the shopping center from the residential
areas to the south and east. The road is also intended
to be the principal access to the village center.
North of Waters Road road Bis intended to provide
access to the office and medium density residential
areas, and a physical separation between these two use
areas. The road could someday be extended to Scio
Church Road when the area adjacent to the west develops, provided that area develops with residences.

8-3

I

�.

.

i)

Proposed Road C - Road C should be developed as a
minor collector road in the west part of the planning
area. The road is intended to provide access to the
residential areas and the public parks. The road
should have a right of way of 66 feet and two driving
lanes, paved.

j)

Other Proposed Roads - The other future roads shown
on map 7 are intended to illustrate concepts of access
to the future residential areas and parks. Each road
should be a public road and ~hould have a right of way
of 66 feet.

k)

Road Construction - All roads in the planning area
should be constructed to Washtenaw Road Commission
standards for urban roads. All roads should have urban
sections, with concrete curbs and gutters. The roads
should be dedicated to the County Road Commission,
except where private roads are indicated as acceptable.

1)

Rights of way for roads should be dedicated to the
County Road Commission at the time of development of
the fronting property, or arrangements in lieu of
dedication, acceptable to the Road Commission, should
be made.

m)

All roads in the urban part of the planning area
should have street lights in accordance with Pittsfield Township standards.

n)

Access to properties in the Lohr/Waters intersection
area should be restricted as shown on map 9. In
general, access to individual properties elsewhere in
the planning area should be provided by internal
roads, especially in residential developments. Major
non-residential developments may have direct access to
adjacent roads, if the access points are limited in
number and are properly spaced with respect to other
drives and road intersections.

Public Transportation - Bus service should be extended to
the planning area as the area develops. The planning area
should be connected with bus routes to the north, on Ann
Arbor Saline Road and Eisenhower Parkway, and to the east,
on Ellsworth and State Roads. The road system in the planning area, and the internal circulation systems of the
shopping center and other major use areas, should be designed to accommodate busses.
8.03

Pedestrian/Bicycle Paths - Paths or sidewalks should be

8-4

�provided along all streets in the urban part of the
planning area. Bicycle lanes lanes should be provided
on both sides of Ann Arbor Saline Road. Paths should be
provided to connect urban residential areas with public
parks, the village center, the shopping center, and employment areas. The highway commercial area, the village center,
the shopping center, and office areas should be interconnected with paths.

.
•

______________________________
8-5

. .-.

I

,

�Sc IO C~L.'12C.t-4 l?D.

WAY

z.WATEJ25 ~ I.Z.O ,

4

z.

'2..

12.0

I

120·

2. = Fl.Vf tAJ'l.eti. Lo. vies
120 1 :: F ~ 4?.0,\)J.

.

.

-.

-- -- - -_... _. ~· - ;_
- . ....... ..... ... . /. . " -·....

-.-·.

.

-

- .

._ ,_. __;,__.:_--•

•

'I,

·.

•

--·-

....

- ·-- ·.-

- ...

�Sc t O C~lJl2.C.H gD.

I

I

l

I
I

I
l
I
WATE2S ~ -

I 3,200

2,100

I
I

I

l

14,~

R, 100
830

Z,200

�z:

....
0

!;;:

uz:

0\

0 ex:
...J ...J
~ 0..

t

0..

ex:

:E

OU
...JZ

ex: ::c w

~

~ J ~
a

a

--

____J . . ,- - -

....... o
~u

.'.'

-~-,.~

.. .

-

_,_ __---•--..--..-·· - --_

_l.:_ .. . ·• .
.

- --

.

--· -----

�PART 9
IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES

9.01

Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements - The phase 1 sanitary
sewer, between the connection at Briarwood ·and the terminus
on Ann Arbor Saline Road, including the stubs to the south
on Lohr Road and to the northwest, on Waters Road; the 16"
water main from the southwest corner of Airport Plaza; and
the Platt/Morgan booster station will ·be constructed by the
Pittsfield Township Utilities Department. A consortium of
property owners that will benefit from these improvements
will pay 85 perceni of . the costs ·of constr~ction, and ·the
Utilities Department will pay the remaining 15 percent. The
Utilities Department will pay the full costs of providing
the 750,000 gallon elevated water storage tank, the 2 million gallon ground water storage tank, and the 24" transmission line, since these improvements will benefit all public
water users in the Township.
All costs of constructing connecting lines from individual
properties in the service area to water lines and sanitary
sewers will be paid for by developers or owners of those
properties.

9.02

Storm Drainage Facilities - Each property, when it develops,
will be required to provide drainage facilities, including
storm water retention areas, according to Township standards, with all costs thereof to be paid by the developer.
Drainage districts will be established to assure that a
permanent mechanism exists for maintenance of drainage
facilities. Property owners will be encouraged to participate in providing common drainage facilities, especially
retention areas.

9.03

Police Protection - Police services will be provided to the
planning area by Pittsfield Township, out of the Township's
general fund. No new capital facilities will be provided in
the planning area.

9.04

Fire Protection - Fire protection will be provided to the
planning area, as well as the State Road corridor, by a
substation located at the Township Hall. A portion of the
old main fire station will be remodeled to house a fire
truck and other equipment. A new truck (pumper) will be
purchased for stationing at this location. The costs of the
new truck and remodeling will be paid by the Township's
general fund.

"9-1

�It should be noted that this substation is one of two substations that have been planned since the main fire station
was moved to the Platt/Michigan location. The State/Ellsworth substation is needed not only to serve the planning
area; it is also needed to provide adequate service to existing and future commercial and industrial developments in
the State Road corridor.

9.05

Roads - Road i~provements will be provided as follows.
a)

Ann Arbor Saline Road - Additional right of way will
be dedicated by properties upon development. The
shopping center should provide a widened surface from
the 194 ramps to a point south of road B, with
paybacks to be obtained from other frontage properties
when they are developed. Widening of the road south of
road B will be provided by developers of frontage
properties in that area.

b)

Maple Road - The road will be paved as part of the
County Road Commission's road improvement program.
Adjacent properties should pay their fair share of the
improvement costs at the time of development.

c)

Ellsworth Road - The road will be paved as part of the
Road Commission's road improvement program, with fair
share contributions from neighboring properties when
they develop. Additional right of way should be
obtained by dedication at the time of development.

d)

Lohr Road - Additional right of way will be obtained
by dedication upon development of adjacent properties.
Since the road improvements will primarily benefit
neighboring properties and not the general public,
improvement costs should be paid by the benefiting
property owners. A special assessment district could
be established for improving Lohr Road. ·

e)

Waters Road - Road improvements should be provided by
developers as part of development projects. Payback
arrangements could be used.

f)

Road A - The first stage of road A (east of Saline Ann
Arbor Road) should be constructed by the shopping
center developer, as the north access drive and
service drive for the center. This segment of the road
should be constructed to County Road Commission
standards for future conversion to a public road. The
remaining section of the road, to connect with Lohr
Road, should be constructed when the highway commercial area (radio station property) is developed, with

9-2

�the costs to be paid by that developer. If an alternate alignment is used, the costs would be shared by
the developers of the highway commercial and office
areas.
The segment of road A between Ann Arbor Saline and
Waters Roads should be constructed at the time that
development of the highway commercial area at 194
commences. This will avoid increasing traffic problems
at the Lohr/Waters intersection. Therefore, the
developer of the highway commercial property should
pay the road improvement costs, including right of way
acquisition, with payback arrangements with other
benefiting property owners.
g)

The segment of road B between Ann Arbor Saline Road
and the entry to the shopping center should be
constructed by the shopping center developer, at the
time the center is constructed. Construction of the
remainder of road B, along the center's frontage,
should be guaranteed by the developer of the center,
or by the owner of the property from whom the shopping
center site was obtained, or a combination of the two.
The segment of road B between the shopping center and
Lohr Road should be constructed by the developer of
the property that it crosses, as part of the first
phase of that development. Similarly, the segment of
road B between Lohr and Ellsworth Roads should be
constructed by the developers of that area.

h)

Road C - Road C should be constructed by developers as
part of the residential developments that it will
serve. Similarly, other roads shown on map 7, as well
as others that might be needed to serve interior
areas, should be provided by developers of the areas
served by those roads.

9.06

Street Lighting - Street lighting equipment should be provided by developers as part of development projects. Operation and maintenance costs of the lighting systems should be
paid by special assessment districts, established at the
time of development.

9.07

Garbage and Refuse Collection - Collection services should
be provided by private contractors.

9.08

Parks and Open Space - Open space areas, such as stream
corridors, significant fence rows, and woods will be
preserved by density transfer and development review (site
plan and subdivision plat reviews). Land for neighborhood

9-3

I

�parks will be obtained by density transfer, to the extent
possible, with public purchase where necessary. Land for the
community park will be acquired by public purchase. Development, operation, and maintenance costs of the parks will be
paid by the Township's Recreation Department budget. Grant
money will be sought for acquisition and development of the
proposed park lands.
9.09

Zoning Plan - Special zoning districts should be established for the shopping center and the village center. These
districts should link zoning approval to preliminary site
plans, and should establish architectural and landscape
standards. Each district should require a design review
process to assure that the design standards will be met.
The PUD process should be used in all parts of the planning
area, especially in areas in which open space is to be
preserved, density transfer is needed, or mixed uses are
proposed.
The entry zone should be protected by a special zoning
district. The district should establish boundaries of the
zone, use and setback regulations, and design criteria. The
zone should be applied to the area by Township initiative.
Landscaping and other improvements needed to implement the
entry zone concept should be provided by developers as part
of the adjacent developments. A detailed plan should be
prepared for the entry zone.

9-4

�AMENDMENT 16

REVISION TO AMENDMEMT 14
NORTHWEST AREA PLllN
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP
WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Adopted by the
Pittsfield Township Planning Commission
December 3, 1987

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION:

I hereby certify that the attached amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan of Pittsfield Charter Township was adopted by the Planning
co-ission of Pittsfield Charter Township, in accordance with Act
168, Public Acts of 1959, as aaended, by unanimous vote (6 yes, 0
no, 1 absent) on Deceaber 3, 1987.

eer, Secretary
Planning Commission
Pittsfield Charter Township

�AMENDMENT

#6

REVISION TO AMENDMENT 14
NORTHWEST AREA PLAN
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PITTSFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP

Section 5.01 of the Northwest Area Plan, adopted on February 6,
1986, as Amendment i4 to the Pittsfield Township Comprehensive
Plan, is hereby amended by adding the following sentences at the
end of the fourth paragraph of this section:
"Single family attached dwelling units, at a maximum density of 6
DUs/acre, may be permitted in the portions of residential components 2b and 3b that abut or are close to the village center
and the shopping center if such units will have the character of
single family dwellings. These units will serve as a transition
between the commercial areas and the lower density residential
areas further west and south."

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010644">
                <text>Pittsfield-Charter-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan-Amendments_1979-1987</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010645">
                <text>Pittsfield Township Planning Commission, Pittsfield Charter Township, Washtenaw County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010646">
                <text>1979-1987</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010647">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan Amendments</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010648">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Pittsfield Charter Township was prepared by the Pittsfield Township Planning Commission and were adopted from 1979-1987.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010649">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010650">
                <text>Pittsfield Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010651">
                <text>Washtenaw County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010652">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010654">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010655">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010656">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010657">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038474">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54688" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58959">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4fa777eaecaee78ac3072cbda68381c4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>effd17fd8a781d75ed3d0945da611d2c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008125">
                    <text>ER and WATER
· FACILITIES

�I
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FOR
SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES
Emmet County, Michigan
APRIL, 1971

PART I-A:

Population, Economic
Conditions, Public Utilities, Resources, Agriculture, Land Patterns,
Trends and Water Resources.

PART II-A:

Maps of the Planning Area,
Soils, Topography, Land
Use, Sewer and Water Systems.

B:

Financing Plan

C:

Plan Updating Proposal

PART III:

Comprehensive Sewer and
Water Plan

PREPARED FOR:
THE EMMET COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PREPARED BY:
VILICAN-LEMAN &amp; ASSOCIATES, INC.
COMMUNITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS
29621 NORTHWESTERN HIGHWAY
SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 48076
and
McNAMEE, PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN
The preparation of this report was financially aided through a Comprehensive Sewer and Water Planning Grant fro~ the Farmers Horne Administration of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

�COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
WARD H. WALSTROM, Chairman
DONALD HODGKISS, Vice Chairman
CHARLES WILLS, Secretary
ROBERT CILKE, JR.
JAMES Co ESTERLINE
THOMAS FAIRBAIRN
SEBERON LITZENBURGER
HARRY PINTARELLI
ROBERT TRACY

COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSTONERS
HUGH HEYNIG, Chairman
HUBERT BACHELOR
ROBERT CILKE, JR.
AL FOSTER
ROBERT J. GREENWELL
ERNEST KUEBLER
DONALD D. JARDINE
ERNST MANTHEI
FRANK SCHMALZRIED
J o H. WEBSTER
Eo So WIXSON

�C O N T E N T S

FOREWARD

l

POPULATION

1

TRENDS
AGE GROUPS
PROJECTIONS
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS

1
2
4
6

AREA ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

8

FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

9

EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITIES
AREA-WIDE TRANSPORTATION
WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES
SANITARY LAND FILLS (Solid Waste Disposal)
CENTERS OF TRADE AND COMMUNICATION
NATURAL RESOURCES
SOILS
TOPOGRAPHY
DRAINAGE PATTERNS
WATER RESOURCES
AGRICULTURE, LAND PATTERNS AND TRENDS
LA.T\JD PATTERNS
POTENTIAL FOR RECREATION AND TOURISM
TRENDS IN COMMERCIAL USES
TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL USES
EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION
TRENDS IN RESIDENTIAL USES

13
13
15
17
19
23
24
27
29
30
32
35
39
40
47
47
51

WATER RESOURCES

59

LONG RANGE FINANCING PLAN

60

PUBLIC ACT 185
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
ACT 94 REVENUE BONDS
STATE AND FEDERAL AID
ACT 188
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS

60
61
62
62
63

PLAN UPDATING PROPOSAL

64

COMPREHENSIVE SEWER AND WATER PLAN

66

WASTE WATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT
COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS
FUTURE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS

66
72
79

�T A B L E S

•

1.

HISTORY OF POPULATION GROWTH - 1900-1970

1

2.

POPULATION TRENDS:

3

3.

SUMMARY OF COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS

4

4.

PROJECTIONS FOR COUNTY CIVIL DIVISIONS

5

5.

RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN SELECTED AREAS

6

6.

HOUSEHOLD SIZE - 1960

7

7.

STATE EQUALIZED VALUATIONS BY COMMUNITY

11

8.

TYPICAL TOWNSHIP - SCHOOL PROPERTY TAX

12

9.

RESIDENTIAL WATER AND SEWER SERVICES

16

10.

INVENTORY OF COMMUNITY SERVICES

22

11.

COUNTY SOIL RESOURCES

25

12 .

SELECTED FARM CHARACTERISTICS

33

1 3.

VALUE OF FARM PRODUCTS SOLD

34

14.

EXISTING LAND USE

36

15.

RETAIL SALES BY YEAR

42

16.

1960 OCCUPATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS

48

17.

EMPLOYEES BY MAJOR INDUSTRY GROUP

50

18 .

PETOSKEY, MICHIGAN - COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
OF WATER

74

A.W.W . A. WATER QUALITY GOALS
U.S.P,H . S. DRINKING WATER STANDARDS

74

HARBOR SPRINGS, MICHIGAN - COMPLETE CHEMICAL
ANALYSIS OF WATER

75

MACKINAW CITY, MICHIGAN - COMPLETE CHEMICAL
ANALYSIS OF WATER

76

WELLS DRILLED IN EMMET COUNTY IN 1970

78

1930 to 1970

•

19.
20 .

210
22 .

�I L L U S T RA T I 0 N S

J

J

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE

22A

EXISTING COMMUNITY WATER SERVICE

22B

GENERALIZED SOIL RESOURCES

24A

TOPOGRAPHY

27A

EX I STING LAND USE

35A

RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN

53A

FUTURE COMMUNITY WATER SERVICE

69A

FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE

79A

�A P P E N D I X T A B L E S

J

J
J

1.
--;---

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 1

A-1

2.

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 2

A-2

3.

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 3

A-3

4o

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 4

A-4

5

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICTS NO'S. 5 - 11

A-5

0

�FOREWORD

J
J

This report is titled the "Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan", for
Emmet County, Michigan, and was funded by a planning grant from the
Farmers Home Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture.
When application was made for the Farmers Home Administration planning
grant, a supplemental planning program was funded by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to prepare a County-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The operation of this two phase planning
program resulted in a more comprehensive approach to County planning.
The Water and Sewer Plan is more complete because it benefited from
detailed land use plans developed under the "70ltr work.
Conversely,
the Comprehensive County Land Use Plan will be more complete because
of the research completed for this plan.
The two programs dovetailed well from a technical point of view, and
both were coordinated under the auspices of the Emmet County Planning
Commission . This Plan was accepted and approved by a formal resolution of the Planning Commission on April 21, 1971.
It is cautioned that much of the basic statistical analysis work was
completed before any 1970 census data was available. Hence, persons
using this report should consider this unavoidable limitation.
For
some data, however, census data recently available has been trinserted"
to give a more accurate trend picture.

J

l

-

�COMPREHENSIVE SEWER AND WATER
PLAN:
PART I and PART II

�POPULATION

!Eart I

Ao 1 . )

In November of 1969, a Comprehensive Analysis and Report of Population
in Emmet County was prepared with FHA Planning Assistance Funds. The
conclusions from that report are summarized and updated herein so that
the finds will be current for this Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan.
TRENDS
Emmet County's population in 1960 was lower than it was in 1950. Also,
the County's population in 1930 was only slightly lower than the 1960
total.
However, the 1970 Census reports show a 15.3% increase over
1960. Despite this recent gain, the County reached its peak population in 1910.
The history of County population change since 1900 is summarized in
TABLE 1.

TABLE 1
HISTORY OF POPULATION GROWTH - 1900 to 1970
Emmet County
County Population

Census Year
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970

15,931
18,561
15,639
15,109
15,791
16,534
15,904
18,337

Emmet County's past growth represents a long period of population
stability, despite two World Wars, a major depression and other
volitile national growth influences.
In the decades from 1930 to
1970, the population increased 14.6%, yet the 1910 population was
230 persons higher than in 1970.
Emmet County is composed of 16 Townships ranging in size from 185
citizens to a population of 2,450.
The past growth pattern of these
communities varied from one another, some increasing gradually while
others lost population.

- l -

�TABLE 2 illustrates the recent history of population growth among the
communities of the County. Only four Townships have increased in population in each Census year between 1930 and 1970. These are the Townships of Little Traverse, Littlefield, Resort and Springvale. Bear
Creek Township and West Traverse Township have experienced consistent
growth since 1940.
Between 1950 and 1960, eight Townships reported
population decreases .
Since 1960, six Townships reported declines .
Population losses since 1960 occurred in the Townships of Bliss, Carp
Lake, Friendship, McKinley, Pleasantview and Readmond.
Those that
experienced increases, exceeded the growth rates of the Cities and
Villages .
Little Traverse and Center Townships increased by a rate
ov~r 60%. WaWatam Township had the lowest percent increase at 17.1%
which exceeded the County average of 15.3%.
In the order of importance, the largest numerical population gains
occurred in Bear Creek Township, Little Traverse Townsnip, Littlefield
Township, Resort Township, Harbor Springs, Petoskey, Springvale Township and Center Township.
AGE GROUPS
,Some of the population age group data which characterized Emmet County
in 1960 is described below. This data should be re-evaluated when the
results of the 1970 Census become available.
1.

Pre-School Age (Under 5 years)
In 1960, 12.4% of Michigan's population was under five years of
age . West Traverse Township had 16%.
In the order of highest
percentage, Springvale, Bear Creek, Wawatam, Resort and Friendship Townships also exceeded the State average.
Pleasantview,
Center and Cross Village Townships reported fewer than 6% of the
population in this age group.

2.

School Age to young Adults (5 to 24 years)
Both the County and State have 33.7% of their population in the
school age - young adult group.
Eleven of the 16 Townships have
higher than average proportions, with Readmond, Friendship, West
Traverse, Bliss, Center and Resort Township's exceeding 36% ~

3.

Family Forming or Young Labor Force (25 - 44 years)
A consistent population disparity with State averages in northern
communities is the family forming or young labor force population
group.
The State reported 26.5% of the 1960 population in this
group, while Emmet County reported 21.8%.
Only Pleasantview Township exceeds the State average, with 53% of
the population aged 25 to 44 years.
In contrast, Cross Village
and Center Townships have less than 16% of their population in
this age group.
- 2 -

�\---4

L.J

TABLE 2
POPULATION TRENDS:

1930 to 1970

Emmet County &amp; Civil Divisions

Township_s_:

w

Bear Creek
Bliss
Carp Lake
Center
Cross Village
Friendship
Little Traverse
Littlefield
McKinley
Maple River
Pleasantview
Readmond
Resort
Springvale
Wawatam
West Traverse

1930

__
1940,

1950
-

1960
-

1,227
399
374
442
323
336
4-40
691
1,121
53 8
165
362
656
298
298
270
7,94-0

1,204
421
431
425
290
428
481
835
980
540
207
4-40
708
371
343
245
8,349

1,756
355
524
307
228
297
575
842
845
415
114
352
727
387
397
319
8 , 4- 4-_0

1,859
298
464
215
14-0
318
602
906
8 4-3
335
198
246
74- 8
467
368
326
8,333

287
1, 4-2 9
'283
810
5,740
7,169

330
1,4-23
326
562
6,019
7, 44-2

319
1,626
365
4- 4-2
6, 4-6 8
8,094-

290
1,433
336
429
6,138
7,571

15, rog

15,791

16,534-

15,904

60 to 70 Chan~e
Number Percent
591
31. 8
- 16 - 5.4
- 5.4
- 25
134
62.3
45
32.1
78
-24.5
63,6
383
39.7
360
- 0.9
8
23,9
80
_
3
7. 4
- 74
- 12 - 4.9
· 2 51
34.9
4 2. 0
196
17.1
63
28.8
9 41,98423.8%

1970
2,450
282
439
349
185
2 4-0
985
1,266
835
415
1242 3 41,009
663
431
4-2 0
10,327

Cities &amp; Villages:
~':Alanson
Harbor Springs
*Mackinaw City (pt)
~•:Pellston
Petoskey City
County
NOTE:

-

72
229
6
40
204
4-3 3

2--;1+21

2 4-. 8
16.0
- 1.8
9.3
3. 3

s-:r
15. 3%

362
1,662
330
469
6,342
8,004
18, 3 jl

Villages indicated with* are included with their respectiv e Townships and
not added under the category 11 cities and villagesir,

�4.

Mature Family Group (45 to 64 years)
Nearly 21% of the County population is aged 45 to 64 years, which
compares closely with the State's proportion of 19.2%. Township
proportions range from the low 11.6% in Pleasantview to the high
of 26.5% in Center.
In general, Northern Michigan communities
have higher proportions of mature family aged groups and Emmet
County reflects this pattern.

5.

Retirement Age Group (65 and over)
Emmet County has a significantly higher proportion of retirement
age citizens than the State (12.1% compared with 8.1%).
Only two
Townships have percentages lower than the State average:
Pleasantview 3% and Friendship 7.9%. Cross Village has the highest proportion with 27.1%. A large proportion of retirement age citizens
is also typical of northern area communities.

PROJECTIONS
For the purposes of the Emmet County Comprehensive Plan, four population
projections to 1990 were completed for a 22 year projection period,
beginning with 1968 . These were done before 1970 Census data was
available.
The results of the various methods are summarized on
TABLE 3.

I

I
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Emmet County

Projection Method

1960
Population

1990
Projection

Long Term Arithmetic

15,904

18,331

16,700

Long Term (Dept. of Commerce)

15,904

18,331

18,180

Short Term Arithmetic

15,904

18,331

21,890

Short Term Ratio Apportionment

15,904

18,331

22,000

Average

J

1970
Population

19,9 4 0

-

4 -

�If the four projection methods are averaged, the 1990 population would
total 19,940 persons . As a general conclusion, the short range projection techniques appear to be the most accurate in view of the 1970
total population.
If the current pace of growth continues, the 1990
"average" projection figure will be reached by 1980.
It was assumed that the Michigan Department of Commerce projections
for the Civil Divisions of Emmet County would be reasonable working
estimates of future population.
These are presented along with the
adjusted population for communities in the Petoskey Area on TABLE 4,
"Projections for County Civil Divisions".
The 1970 population Census
strongly indicates that many Civil Divisions are growing more rapidly
than the Department of Commerce figures indicate.
In any event, it
should be recognized that projections for smaller community areas,
are tenuous and more subject to inaccurate results. Also, the process
of apportioning a total County population of less than 20,000 persons
among 18 communities is always a questionable procedure.

TABLE 4
PROJECTIONS FOR COUNTY CIVIL DIVISIONS
Emmet County

County Civil Divisions

1960
Population

Bear Creek Township
Bliss Township
Carp Lake Township
Center Township
Cross Village Township
Friendship Township
Little Traverse Township
Littlefield Township (Alanson)
McKinley Township
Maple River Township
Pleasantview Township
Readmond Township
Resort Township
Springvale Township
WaWatam Township
West Traverse Township
Harbor Springs (City)
Petoskey (City)
Total County
1

2

-

1
1990
Projection

1990 Projection
Adjusted for
Petoskey Area
Projections

1,859
298
464
215
140
318
602
906
843
335
198
246
748
467
368
326
1,433
6,138

2,63Q
247
582
94
65
238
770
1,040
810
226
165
150
860
565
450
400
1,750
7,138

2,380
Low
3,165
Low
Low
7,520

15,904

18,180

22,502

5,050
Low
Low
4,387
Low
Low

Michigan Department of Commerce Projections. The 1970 U.S. Census
provides a basis for re-evaluating the projection results for Civil
Divisions.
Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., Projection for the Petoskey Area
Planning Commission, and comments based on 1970 Census findings.
-

5 -

2

�With t he adjustments made for Petoskey, Bear Creek Township and Resort
Township, the total projected 1990 County Population is 22,500 . This
f i gure will be used for the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan.
It is
r easonable, but slightly conservative in view of the 242.7 person per
year growth experienced since 1960.
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS
1.

Commuting Patterns
Ac cording to t he 1960 U. S . Census of Population, 262 workers commut ed to jobs outside of Emmet County (5.5% of the employed workers ).
Comparat i ve commuting rates in adjoining Counties are:
6 . 0% in
Ot sego, 7. 5% in Cheboygan and 11 . 3% in Charlevoix o It may be conclu ded that a comparatively high rate of persons who work in the
County live in the County . Hence, a new employment source in Emme t
Cou nty will attract employees and families into the County as well .

2.

Dens i ty
For each resident in Emmet County there is 16.2 acres of land .
Considerably less per capita area is available when the influx
of tourists are included . The results of an analysis of density
for selected residential blocks in the County are presented on
TABLE 5 .

TABLE 5
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN SELECTED AREAS
Emmet County
Select ed
Commu nity

Land Eer Dwelling

Alanson
Brutu s
Conway
Cross Village
Pells t on
Lev ering
Oden
Pon-she-wa-ing (Oden)
Paradise Lake
Van

1 0,000
12,500
7,650
15,000
6,600
9,720
12,860
6,000
12,500
15,000

square
square
square
square
square
square
square
square
square
square

feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet

Dwellings
:12er acre
4 o3
3. 5
5. 7
2. 9
6.6
4. 5
3. 4
7.3
3. 5
2. 9

The fo r ego i ng density l ist i s based on sample blocks in areas where
the r e a r e no community water or sewer systems . Within each community
area individual homes may be sited on either smaller or larger sites .
-

6 -

�Households &amp; Family Size
In 1960 there were 4,696 households in Emmet County as reported in the
U. S o Census of Population. Dividing the population in households by
the number of households gives an average population per household of
3 . 33 persons. This is compared with other communities in TABLE 6 .

TABLE 6
HOUSEHOLD SIZE - 1960
Community
The State of Michigan
Emme t County
Charlevoix County
Cheboygan County
Grand Traverse County

Average Number of Persons
per Household in 1960
3 . 42
3.33
3.35
3.49
3.31

1950 to 1960
Percent Change
+ 24 . 9 %
2 . 1%
0 . 3%
+ 6 . 5%
+ 21. 3%

Comparatively, the County has a low po~ulation per household, and had
been decreasing through 1960 . This trend may or may not be continuing
through 1970, but is probably influenced by: fewer young people livi ng
on farms, increased retirement age population, high proportion of
retirement age citizens, and the in-migration of students at North
Central Michigan College.

J

- 7 -

�AREA ECONOMIC CONDITIONS !PART I A. 2.)
Emmet County's location in the northwest regi0n of the State has a
direct relationship on economic conditions in the area .
From sev eral
indices, the regi0n including the County is economically behind the
State of Michigan, recogn i zing that the State economy is heav ily influenced by rapidly growing and industrialized metr opolitan areas . In
general, the northern and nonmetropolitan areas of the State are i nfluenced by resource industries (agriculture, forestry, fishing, min- ·.
ing, etc.) rather than manufacturing. Moreover, retail services a r e
highly dependent upon seasonal trade fr0m tourist recreation act iv i ty.
The result of these regional conditions are manifested by seasonal
employment fluctuations, lower wage scales, and limited job oppor t un i ties .
There tends to be a predominance of older citizens of retirement age,
community services . '.are generally inadequate - especially water and
sewer utilities, and housing has a higher incidence of substandardness .
As there are broad differences in the economic characteristics of the
State, there are economic differences among communities withi n a r egie2m .
For example, Emmet County has economic resour-ces and economic activ ities
that differ from other Counties in the Northwest Region.
Following is a summary of economic indicators that reflect on the char acter and status of Emmet County's economy.
Data sources reflect Comprehensive Plan finding, census reports, assessors records, sales tax
reports and data published for the Northwest Economic Development
District .
1.

Slightly less than the region average in acreage of commercial
forest (182,700 acres) .
This suggests that the County has a forestry economy that is t yp i ca l
of other Counties in the region .

2.

Based upon 1967 M, E . S.C . data Emmet County had a February unemployment rate of 9.5%.
This dropped to 4.5% in August (av erage 8.0 %
for 1967) .
The County has a high rate of unemployment in comparison with Stat eNational averages . Peak seasonal employment gains br i ng the Cou nty
up to the State average for a brief period in the summer .

3.

Agriculture is a _good basic economic activity, with high spec i a l ization in livestock (dairy, poultry, and other) . The average
agric ultural employment was 300 jobs according to 1 967 M. E . S . C.
U. S . Census findings reflect a declining trend in farm employment ,
bu t an increasing v alue of farm products are sold .

- 8 -

�4.

Population trends are a general index of overall economic conditions.
Emmet County has maintained a fairly stable population
level for several decades, with the 1990 population being almost
equal to the 1960 level.
Since 1960, however, growth has been
taking place and if the trend continues the 1990 population will
approximate 22,500 persons.
Urban influenced areas will absorb
most of this impact.

So

Tax collections on retail sales give a strong indication of growth
in the retail community.
Between 1962 and 1969, sales taxes collected in Emmet County increased by 68%.

6.

Real Estate values in Emmet County are also increasing at a high
rate.
From Farm Census data, it was reported that the average
value of farms has increased 136% between 1954 and 1964. This
high change results in part from farm consolidation and in part
from increased demands for land on a state wide scale.
County assessment records also indicate strong upward trends in
the value of Real Estate.
In 1968, the County's State Equalized
Valuation was $62.9 million. The 1970 S.E.V. stands at $98,0
million.

7.

Other indices of economic vitality in Emmet County show growth
trends in: wholesale trade sales, retail sales, value added by
manufacturing and bank deposits.

FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
Tpe financial ability of every community must be viewed in terms of a
particular project or community facility.
There are usually two basic
determinants of financial ability:
1.

Legal permissives or limitations on local financing.

2.

Community acceptance of policies of programs to utilize available
financing.

Legal financing limitations are determined by State Statute, and as a
rule there are fewer financing alternatives available to townships than
to cities.
However, townships are permitted to provide and maintain
various acilities, including water mains and sewage collection
systems.

1

1

With a County Department of Public Works, Emmet County could lend
its credit for up to $9.8 million worth of public works (water,
sewage and solid wastes.)
-

9 -

�A significant finding irom TABLE 7 shows that the Township communities
are accounting for an increasingly larger share of the total County
valuation . In 1968, townships accounted for 63.3% of the total and
by 1970, the proportion increased to 68.9%. Two townships with the
largest valuations are Bear Creek and Resort, and both of these communities are within the urbanizing influence of the City of Petoskey.
Also, both Resort and Bear Creek have substantial lake frontages for
cottage and seasonal home development in locations farther removed
from Petoskey.
·
Five (5) townships which are experiencing pressures from urbanization
and tourism-recreation development are Wawatam, Little Traverse, Littlefield, West Traverse and Springvale. The equalized valuations of these
communities range from 3.3% to 7.5% of the County total . These Townships also increased their share of the County total valuation (except
West Traverse). Even though Pleasantview Township houses major ski
resorts and seasonal home developments, the proportion of total County
valuation is only 2.5%.
The remaining Township communities each account for less than 3.3% of
the County's total valuation. As a general observation, the tax base
of the major urban and tourist influenced townships is broadening and
therefore a corresponding legal ability to finance public improvements
for water and sewage facilities.
Each Township in Emmet County has a different tax rate.
This is because
the local population varies, some Townships support services which others
do not (as a cemetery), local assessments of true cash value vary, and
different school district taxes are involved. TABLE 8 was prepared to
illustrate the combined affect of the variables affecting local tax
levies. The TABLE shows the theoretical situation of a $20,000 home,
and how it would be valued and assessed in each Township.
The basis of most local financial ability is the valuation of all property in the community . This data is used to determine overall bond debt
ability, which can be exceeded by extra voted millage authorized by the
citizenry. Of itself, however, the assessed valuation does not; (a)
reflect the ability of individual families to afford a given tax levy,
(b) show the need for a given project, (c) indicate citizen desires to
have the service.
TABLE 7 gives a comparative list of assessed valuations as equalized
for each community in the County since 1968. Through property reevaluation and some new development, there was a dramatic rise in the
valuations between 1968 and 1969 . However, the $4.28 million increase
between 1969 and 1970 is due largely to new development.

- 10 -

�TABLE 7
STATE EQUALIZED VALUATIONS BY COMMUNITY
Emmet County

1968
Bear Creek
Bliss
Carp Lake
Center
Cross Village
Friendship
Littlefield
Little Traverse
Maple River
McKinley

f-'
f-'

$ 5,570,465
468,150
1,439,470
492,415
635,295
613,121
2,354,045
3,980,654
786,256
1,386,190

1968
Percent
8.86%
.74
2.29

1969

1970

1.01

$10,165,720
720,779
2,803,304
670,454
1,066,485

$10,727,362
726,588
3,050,153
681,558
1,079,342

.98
3.74
6.33
1.25
2.20

1,132,554
4,368,430
6,871,040
1,474,623
2,185,315

1,152,416
4,621,860
6,674,502
1,745,664
2,590,696

•78

1970
Percent
10.94%
. 74
3.11
•70

1.10
1.18
4.71
6.95
1. 7 8
2.64

Pleasantview
Readmond
Resort
Springvale
Wa\Jatam
West Traverse
Total

1,374,852
1,021,384
13,269,882
1,149,967
2,476,770
2,751,859
$39,770,775

2.19
1.62
21.11
L 83
3. 94
4.38
63.25%

2,070,259
1,374,687
16,447,410
3,006,618
5,894,248
3,313,252
$63,564,908

2,426,763
1,447,417
16,602,352
3,284,069
7,366,710
3,405,011
$67,582,463

2.48
1. 48
16.93
3.35
7.51
3. 47
68.97%

Petoskey
Harbor Springs
Total

$19,050,075
4,055,546
$23,105,621

30.30%
6.45%
36.75%

$23,509,704
6,645,088
$30,154,792

$23,758,147
6,661,350
$30,419,497

24.23%
6.80%
31. 13 %

Emmet County

$62,876,396

$93,719,700

$98,001,960

SOURCE:

100.0%

Mr. Alan F. Behan, Director
Emmet County Equalization Department

100.0%

�TABLE 8
TYPICAL TOWNSHIP - SCHOOL PROPERTY TAX
Emmet County
$20,000 HOME AS A BASE
S.E.V. Assess.:::.
ment, 50% of
True Cash Value
Bear Creek
Bliss
Carp Lake
Center
Cross Village
Friendship
Littlefield
Little Traverse
Maple River
McKinley
Pleasantview
Readmond
Resort
Springvale
Wawatam
West Traverse

$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000

Totals for Averaging
County Average (Townships)

SOURCE FOR TAX RATES:

Book Value for
Tax purposes
by Township
$

6,940
6,250
9,520
5,340
7,750
5,780
6,620
5,980
9,610
8,260
7,630
4,460
9,350
4,440
8,060
6,490

Typical
Tax Bill
for 1969
$

33 7 .4 2
302 . 25
355 000
307 . 58
286 . 90
342 . 11
399 , 38
349 . 90
343.27
302.65
348 . 46
342.93
326 . 03
391.83
323.32
345 098

$112,480

$5,405.01

$

$

7,030

337 . 81

Mr. Alan F. Behan, Director
Emmet County Equalization Department

The overall differential between the high and low township amounted to
$112.48 in 1969, ranging from $286.90 to $399.38. Altogether, the
township's averaged $337,81.
This illustration of a typical tax on a
$20,000 home is only theoretical.
There are other costs related to
home ownership that are not included, such as special service fees
and other private contractual fees that may include well drilling,
septic tank cleaning, garbage collection and non-county snow plowing.

- 12 -

�EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITIES

(PART I A . 3.)

AREA-WIDE TRANSPORTATION
Emmet County has access to several major area-wide transportation services.
These relate to the economy of the County in terms of tourismrecreation, industrial development and retail services.
1.

Highways
The most dominant highway feature serving the County is the I-75
Freeway. Although only a small portion of the freeway actually
enters the County, it is accessible from several major State roads
serving the northwest region of the Lower Peninsula, as well as
County roads.
I-75 is a key transportation facility for truckers
who are moving increased volumes of highway freight and tourists
from metropolitan areas who can now visit the County more often on
two day weekends. A second freeway route (US-131) is planned in
future years to enter Emmet County .
US-31 is a major State trunkline passing through the entire length
of the County. This highway links the Mackinaw Bridge (and I-75)
with the County Airport, and the urban areas of Petoskey.
It is
expected that Highway US-31 will continue as a major local facility
to serve business, industry and tourism-recreation.
Future freeways will supplement the functions of this roadway.
US-131 is a major State trunkline entering the County from the
south, and is a major regional access route from the south.
North of Petoskey, US-131 is a scenic road along Lake Michigan
and it links the Harbor Springs service center with Petoskey.

2.

Airports
Emmet County has three public airports, the County Airport at
Pellston, the Harbor Springs Airport east of Harbor Springs and
the Mackinaw City Airport north of Carp Lake.
a.

Pellston
The County Airport at Pellston is the only scheduled commercial
air service facility in the County, and it serves a fi v e Co u nty
area including Cheboygan . Existing terminal facilities are inadequate to serve the increased passenger traffic generated by
the larger fan jet aircraft and increasing numbers of peop l e
who use air travel service.
Runway extensions are underway
and a new east-west runway may be necessary in the next 20
years.
A conservative projection of traffic shows a 1,000 daily passenger load by 1973 . This is a volume comparable to existing
loads at the Bay City-Midland-Saginaw Airport, some 160 mi l es
to the south. Once the runway extensions have been completed
a major air terminal expansion will be made,
- 13 -

�The Pellston Airport will expand as the area's major air
traffic facility.
It is important, therefore, that residential,
industrial and recreation developments recognize the impact
of jet aircraft and runway approach zones when locating in
the area.
Homes, schools and industries must be planned
around the basic needs of the operating airport and new
demands for community water and sewage services may evolv e
in the area .
b.

Harbor Springs
The City of Harbor Springs owns the County's seco nd largest
air traffic facility in the County. It is primarily a chartered flying service facility, handling executive type aircraft, but no scheduled airline service.
The Harbor Springs Airport is well located near Little Traverse
Bay, major ski resorts, and concentrated areas of recreation
homes.
This produces a year-round market for private-recreational air service between Emmet County and metropolitan
centers in the Midwest.
In the recent five year period, aircraft movements have increased by more than 65%.
The combination of features that make the airport attractive to air
traffic also attract development. Hence, industries, homes
and seasonal-resort dwellings are attracted to the Bay area
and are clustering near to the airport lands.
Some industry
has located adjacent to the airport. The growing use of this
airport and the development of surrounding lands has created
the need to provide community water-sewage facilities.

c.

Mackinaw City
The Village of Mackinaw City owns some 320 acres of land north
of Paradise Lake (also Carp Lake) that has been used for private-recreation air traffic. Having sod runways and no improvements, this landing field receives very minimum use.
The
future of this land for airfield development is not optimistic
and casual private use may be the extent of demand .
Increased demands for use would be greater if an Industrial
Park area were feasible to develop in Mackinaw City or the
lands intervening the City and the Airport.
Until then this airport will have little or no impact on the
area in terms of land use or public facility requirements.

- 14 -

�3.

Lake Ports
With over seventy (70) miles of Lake Michigan shoreline, Emmet
County has access to the shipping lanes of the Great Lakes . At
present, there is only one major industrial port in the County
and this is owned and operated by the Penn-Dixie Cement Company
in Resort Township.
Penn-Dixie is a major County employer involved with mining limestone reserves along the Lake Michigan
shoreline. Another deep-water port is accessable t hrough
Mackinaw City in nearby Cheboygan County.
Recreation boating is the most dominant uses of local harbors and
marinas. This generates demands for docking facilities and a need
for facilities to handle sanitary wastes from both pleasure and
commercial boating activities. The day has passed when direct
dumping of sanitary wastes in any Great Lake can be permitted,
Recreation craft, lake carriers and foreign freighters must be
required to dump wastes in approved land based community disposal systems.
Natural water ways (rivers, lakes and oceans)
can no longer be considered the "final stage 11 in the sewage treatment process.

WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES
At the present time, complete water and sewerage utilities serve the
developed portions of the Cities of Petoskey, Harbor Springs, and the
Village of Mackinaw City.
The Bay View Association in Bear Creek Township has a water and sewage
system connected with Petoskey, but service is now provided only in
the summer months,
The Bay View water mains are above the frost level
and therefore cannot be used in winter months.
For this reason, the
Bay View dwellings are not occupied during the winter skiing season .
There are a few other water and sewer service extensions near the City
of Petoskey, but these are close to the City limits.
In the past,
Petoskey maintained a policy that services would not be extended unless accompanied by annexation. However, broader area-wide services
from the City's system are now feasible.
The City of Harbor Springs ~xtends water services westerly to serv e
the Tamarack Trails subdivisions and easterly into the Wequetonsing .
Sewage collection services closely follow areas within the City limits .
A more complete in-depth review of water and sewer services in Emmet
County will be prepared in the engineering sections of this County
Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan.

- 15 -

�The 1960 Census of Population and Housing provided some basic data on
how County families are being served by sanitary disposal facilities
and community water supplies. TABLE 9 summarizes the significant comparisons between the State and County, including a breakdown for rural
Emmet County. This data should be re-evaluated when the 1970 Census
findings are made available.

TABLE 9
RESIDENTIAL WATER AND SEWER SERVICES
Emmet County
Dwelling Service by Number and Percent
Rural NonFarm
Rural
State of
Emmet County Emmet County Michigan

To t a l
Emmet -Count y

Source of Water
Community System

1,547
29.5%

12
2 . 2%

NIA

NIA

Individual Well

3,318
63.4%

460
82.7%

NIA

NIA

Other or None

372
7.1%
5,237

84
15.1%
556

NIA

NIA

3,746
71.4%

388
71. 2%

85.7%

6,155
77.4%

812
15.5%

64
11. 7%

8.5%

955
12 . 5%

690
13.1%
5,248

93
17.1%
545

5.8%
100 . 0%

Public-Community
System

1,038
19 . 8%

None

Septic Tank

3,272
62.5%

418
75.1%

Other or None

927
17. 7%
5,237

138
24 . 9%
556

7 ~1

Water Service
Hot and Cold Water
in Dwelling
Cold Water Only
in Dwelling
No Piped Water
in Dwelling

801
10 .1 %
7 ,951

Sewa~e Dis;eosal

SOURCE:

U.S. Census of Housing, 1860

-

16

-

94.0%

6,689
84 .1%

6 . 0%
100.0%

1,262
15 . 9%
7,951
100 . 0%

�The conclusions from TABLE 9 indicate the following:
22.5% of the County's dwelling units have only cold water piped in
the structure or have no domestic water in the dwelling (10 . 1%
none).
This condition affects 1,796 dwellings. Assuming half of
these to be seasonal homes, some 2,900 County residents are without adequate water service (900 d.u. x 3,22 per household= 2,880
persons).
801 dwellings (perhaps 400 permanent) have no water service inside
the structure.
456 dwellings (perhaps 230 permanent) do not have a private well
or community water supply.
Nearly 16% of all dwellings have no community sewer system or
septic tank, hence, either there is no sewage facility or the
dwelling has a privy. This affects an estimated 2,000 residents
in the County.
As may be reasonable to assume, most of the inadequately served units
are in rural nonfarm and rural farm areas, because community services
were not available in 1960. Overall, from 15 to 22 percent of all
dwellings have inadequate utility services, even though up to half of
these may be seasonal . However, both seasonal and permanent residences have minimum adequate facilities for sanitary health reasons
as well as to avoid resource pollution.
SANITARY LAND FILLS (Solid Waste Disposal)
Land fill sites are indicated on the ncommunity Facilities" map. When
needed, additional land fill sites can probably be developed with relative ease, because of the rural nature of the County.
However, it
may prove effective to operate land fills in areas where land reclamation could prove beneficial to recreation developments or other
extensive use adaptations. Not withstanding these objectives, care
should be exercised to ensure that land fill sites have minimum
nuisance affects to home areas, tourist facilities and scenic resources o
Other methods of solid waste disposal, such as incineration, probably
would not be considered unless serious pollution and nuisance hazards
occur from existing methods, or unless technological developments
render other methods more feasible,
In any system of waste disposal,
all communities of the County should seriously consider jointly operated disposal areas . This will reduce the number of active disposal
sites operating at a given time and will facilitate the cost of maintaining lands and equipment .

.

]

- 17 -

�Bliss, Center, Pleasantview and Readmond Townships have no sanitary
land fills operating at the present time. However, these communities
may be cooperating with an adjacent Township.
The Cross Village site
is currently unlicensed . Because of operating costs, several Townships may have to cooperate in the operation of sanitary fill areas .
Another feasible method would be to operate a County-wide system
through a County Department of Public Works,
Existing sanitary fill sites are located as follows:
Carp Lake Township, Section - 2
Wawatam Township, Section - 13 in Mackinaw City
Cross Village Township, Section - 34
West Traverse Township, Section - 3
Little Traverse Township, Section 10
Littlefield Township, Section - 17
Springvale Township, Section - 2
Bear Creek Township, Section - 8
Resort Township, served by Bear Creek
Center Township, None
Readmond Township - None
Maple River Township, Section - 3 in Pellston
McKinley Township, Section - 1
Pleasantview Township - None
Bliss Township - None
Friendship Township, served by West Traverse
As evident from the County's Land Use Inventory, there appears to be
a need for disposal areas for used automobiles and major appliances .
It would be most desirable if these waste items could be delivered
to an industry involved with converting the scrap to usable industrial
metals .
Future solid waste disposal demands will increase as a result of increasing tourist visitation and local population growth.
Some items
that will pose serious disposal problems in the future are:
depreciated mobile homes (permanent and travel vehicles).
discarded automobiles, farm implements and other vehicles.
junked appliances, sporting equipment, etc.
Based on national averages, each 1 U. S. citizen discards about 1,500
pounds of solid waste each year.
At this rate, Emmet County produces over 12,000 tons of solid waste each year .
By 1990, the rate
will be 15,200 tons plus discarded waste from tourists who v isit
the County .

•

]

1

More recent national averages indicate that each citizen discards
from six to se v en pounds of solid waste every day . This yields
more than a ton of waste per year (2,300 pounds).

- 18 -

�CENTERS OF TRADE AND COMMUNICATION
Persons who live in rural and unincorporated areas generally depend
upon nearby urban centers (Cities and Villages) for various community services. Hence, it is important for the service center communities to recognize their area-wide roles. For the most part, the
urban centers would have fewer or less adequate serv i ces to offer
were it not for the support of more or less dependent rural areas "
In Emmet County there are several centers of trade and communication
and these vary from one another in terms of size, types of services
and potential for future growth or development. Many of these rural
centers are smaller today than in previous years because of population
out-migration and improved highway access to larger centers such as
Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Cheboygan . Some basic services include:
active recreation, retailing and business services, nonfarm employment, health, education and other services of a social or cultural
nature.
It is not feasible for every Township in Emmet County to
provide all of these services, hence, a natural pattern of urbanrural communication evolves. A key index to the size and influence
of one center over another is the retail base. As~ rule, those
communities which have the highest volume of retail 1ctivity will
also be larger and offer more diverse community wide services o
Although retailing is not the only service of regional importance,
it is a fact that commercial activity is a direct reflection of the
frequency and volume of visits that people in a region make to the
community. Therefore, if people visit the retail center for shopping
purposes, they are likely to patronize such other services as the
post office, library, hospital or a medical office, bank and related
facilities.
In Emmet County, the City of Petoskey has the largest retail-service
influence, and competes effectively on a regional level with centers
as distant as Traverse City and Alpena. The second most influential
County center is the City of Harbor Springs. Of near equal importance,
but influencing the northern portions of the County most is the City
of Cheboygan in adjacent Cheboygan County.
In March, 1969, Emmet County's Commercial Economic Base Analysis was
published under the contract terms of a 11 701 11 Urban Planning Assistance
Granto This report delineated the major retail trade patterns as they
influence Emmet County and communities within the County.
Following
is a summary of findings from the Commercial Base Analysis .
Emmet County has two regional trade areas based upon the retail
potential of Petoskey's downtown shopping area o The primary trade
area was determined to be coterminus with the County boundaries
while the secondary trade area encompasses the County plus the
areas of Charlevoix, East Jordan, Vanderbuilt, Onaway, Mullett
Lake, and Mackinaw City . The larger secondary trade area is based
upon Petoskey's drawing power for major comparison shopping goods
(apparel, furniture, specialty shops, etc.).

- 19 -

�Of the three Counties, Emmet, Charlevoix and Cheboygan, Emmet
County holds a dominant retail position.
Some 43% of the 1963
retail sales in this region occurred in Emmet . Within Emmet
County nearly 76% of the retail sales volume occurred in the City
of Petoskey.
County areas outside of Petoskey which includes
Harbor Springs, increased their share of the total sales between
1958 and 1963.
Using 1963 constant dollar figures, Emmet County's 1958 retail
sales totaled $25.6 million. This increased nearly 1 7% by 1963,
for a total retail sales volume of $29.9 million . During this
same period, the County population increased by less than five
(5) percent.
This is a strong reflection of tourist drawing
power and regional trade area influence.
Population and retail sales trends suggest the high impact of
tourist sales in Emmet County.
From an estimate of "maximumtt
tourist spending, it was concluded that retail sales and services
expenditures attributed to nonpermanent households total some
$13.7 million in 1962. This increased to $22.9 million by 1966
for an overall gain of 67%.
Regardless of the methods employed,
the tourist retail sector of the economy is strong and increasing at a far greater rate than permanent household spending,
Detailed development plans for Petoskey's downtown shopping area
are published in a separate report on the City's retail economic
base. The details for Harbor Springs are also presented in a
separate 1r701n planning program.
Plans for improving the outlying retail areas of Emmet County are contained in the Emmet
County Economic Base report, under the section "Minimum Convenience Centers" . These pertain to the retail areas of Alanson,
Carp Lake, Cross Village, Levering and Pellston .
Retail sales in Emmet County will be distributed among the various
local centers, each serving a slightly different level of retail
activity,
For planning retail service improvements and enlargements, the County's retail centers were classified as follows:
Major Comparison Shopping Center
City of Petoskey
Major Convenience Shopping Centers
Petoskey
Harbor Springs
Mackinaw City

-

20 -

�Minimum Convenience Shopping Centers
Alanson
Carp Lake
Cross Village
Levering
Pellston
Minimum Retail Services (General Store or Larger)
Boyne Highlands - Nubs Nob
Wilderness Park
Larks Lake
Bliss Center
Resort Township

Good Hart
West County Line
Brutus
Epsilon
Stutsmanville

The list of retail centers classified by type is an accurate reflection
of the relative importance of one community over another as a center
for trade, communication and community services, For the most part,
these services are available to the residents of the community center
as well as persons who live in the surrounding Township units of
government .
TABLE 10 briefly lists the distribution of various community services
among selected communities of Emmet County.
Because the data on the
TABLE is derived from several sources, each employing slightly different criteria and prepared at different times, column totals are
not too meaningful. However, the 1963 U. S. Census of Business
reports are based upon consistent data and indicates that 69% of the
County's retail establishments are in the City of Petoskey, 17% in
Harbor Springs and 14% in the Townships and Villages. Tourist lodging facilities present a near opposite picture.
Some 62% of the
County's lodging places are in the Townships and Villages, and 38%
in the two Cities ,
Among the smaller Villages in the County, Alanson, Pellston, Levering,
and Cross Village offer a wider variety of community services, According to area population projections, Alanson has the greatest
potential for improving and expanding retail-community services in
the noncity areas of the County.

J

7

For those communities and County areas that have a projected population loss, and should a future loss become a reality, it is
reasonable to expect future reductions in the quantity and quality
of existing service levels.
Except for Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Mackinaw City, none of the
rural communities and villages provide public water and sewer services (refer to map "Existing Water and Sewer Systems").

- 21 -

�TABLE 10
INVENTORY OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
Emmet County

(l)
(l)

0

cu

(/)

(l)

rl

(/)

P-&lt;

:::&gt;
4-i rl
0 •rl

Selected
Communities
Petoskey

cu

• +'

0

(l)

:z; P:::

bl)

4-i i::
0 •rl
bl)

• 'D
0 0
.....:I

:z;

0

(/)

(/)

rl

•rl

0
0

H

H

H

+'

:s:(l)

..c:

!3

(/)

(/)

(l)

(l)

cu

&gt;

0

:&gt;,

0

H

i::
(l)

0

0

•rl

•rl

+'

(l)
(/)

rl

4-i
4--i

cu

cu

+'

0

0

•rl
rl
.Q
;:::l

•rl
rl
.Q
;:::l

•rl
rl
.Q
;:::l

H

·rl

.Q
•rl

P-&lt;

P-&lt;

P-&lt;

.....:I

::s

P-&lt;

J:y

cu

0

'D
(l)

0

+'
(/)

0

(/)

(l)

H

•rl

218

16

1

1

6

1

4

1

1

Harbor Springs

55

6

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

Alanson

25

1

1

1

1

1

Brutus

4

1

1

Carp Lake

6

5

1

Conway

3

2

1

Cross Village

6

2

Levering

9

5

1

Oden

4

5

1

Pellston

12

2

Mackinaw City
(Emmet Sci.de1:)

15 ~•:

18 1:

Emmet County
SOURCE:

(a)
(b)
(c)

316

58

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

13

5

11

6

1

3

Emmet County Land Use Inventory, 1968
U.S. Census of Business, 1963
Harbor Springs Comprehensive Plan, 1969

-

22 -

1

5

�I

~

~

'

\~'

'

,

,

\

\

1'

,

I

~

l

'''' ' ' '
'

1

I

I

'

~

1 1

i

C £CI L

--c
· ...

8 A Y

~•*• •-

--····-····
,.o•T
T. HN,

~

}1

I
I
I
I

t

·-1

I

'
1

I
. I

A. Ill

-·-----t--

STIIRGEON

--~------- -

7F

8

. r··---.
I~ ,
\ I
,..., (iJ .--;:
'~
i:
:
,,

A Y

LJEEb

~J.

~

'

.
,~

::a:

t
I,

'
~

r, ·

·1,

G

L

G

•,

LJ

\

~

_JI

\ 3\

,.

I -·
-'f-- · - +
I

'7
I

II

i~

___ -4

..
---- I: ---..

..

i'

~~

,~

II•

I

"

-

1

" •

·7"'
!

f

u\\

•

\'

1

'

,

•

1

,

jLJl

Ii

ts:

.

!

r:=:1 --hr.: •
s

•

1 -·

~

MC

'

I

N II

:,

.,.

11

,: K

I /

~

E i'l!..
~
ii
!:·: .....
A
...... / I
,, "IF

'

L

.

•~~-

il

') I

n

~F==--

+

I

'&lt;&gt;i"'

.,

"

..

----Jf"''"'""

1

'

=-

= ~_JI

-

. Q

___•

1 ·-·

•

[·
N

,

L

,

•!,

T

f

n

•

" '-

"
✓-~-Jul----

• ..,1ll~

----,---::'c1:-;c••Q,-_
J"•
!'
::,o
li1
"

•

i~

I';_ - .

,;?
rX,
1"

I

~

.. ;

--

~

~

i'\:
~:,
•
,',r········
,,

'" "' ::1#11
":"

I -~
1

~

-~J

~FFJJ.·l.
1

~

l ,

_ ..

7
~□

7n□i
.r7 -

T 3!5N

'I

+

TRA V E RS E

I
I

A

1..

I

-\ ~.~A~~-----,,

~

'

'

I

I
I\ I II
,---~---

l'\_ . ;\~ .
lI

_.j/ '.

T '6N

1,~_iLLLJ~='-- =;,===a~_j

-- --i•1--·-·•~\ '•

.

.....,_]~

Ri

;;

·, ,,

'

1

1, ! • i V !

1

!

__ _ J .

""

.

[JlLJr
,•]C:i...l/ •
•~-

. ~ir-----:'. ~

A.

•

''!° ____ _

"

---- \i
l ' T

'
IEl " . U~( i\\"-~l===u~~'

•

:-=e,,,,:~(I

•

-

,t,.,~ •
t---i~~~l.J..~•·

f,_1/

" --•

r---_T
J[
a l
v E Rsl\~~=~===~y=\'

-· ,I

i.,

8

□··.I~

----• --

"8'

_______

l~I

LIT T LE

,

l.t
---- ---

• '

w

in ---

~

JL

----nr™

·

· _, _.

..

REA

-.J

..

.• J

T 37N

l)
•

=~~~ ~=;r=JL~ •

..

-=t
.. I

'"!""

•JV''" ''"'"

~

,.,.

-~~-

..

• 1''

=-=-'"'L

---------

'[

-

•----

-

"--

·1

-"-- ·

-! _ 1 ·

j ..

..,'

--- ----

-

T-:--~TI·
-'--::::,
·-"
"--

!

.

,,

•---

=----------

i:J .

:

T.!IN.

~ I

.

C--------- I ( ~-

__,j

·--

..

[";

·:

"R

j

-

"

,.

· ~

I

•
•
1
' •p)1----.-----1'
' •! , . .-. r -' .
"i
I. '\,L _ ;,i
• I
.

-,

;~

.'R _,..
p •

□
h_~-t··,~·j'.7'
•.f":l□•E I .' )~-·~.•..
~ !EJ_J•□'. ' •;~~:B

.

'

I

A

•

.,

'

•

"!

ll . .

[3
.

•otu vu.I.Ml'

R

:

gp

II

i

,.

..!' JI

·7··· ·· •'-

G

',··,
· .
i !!

,

''

.

'

iTEt

N

~n ~ 1 \.

,,.y

"-- -11

E

s_1: -------- :

..

,, ·,- 1·
C

'

.

•

•

•--=,

E

u

.

'I--

•

IN

!I

'

~'----•----''---1

-

~

===---i

s

==:=lk=lr-

•

.

:

I

ip=====,=jf

·- A.

•

u

'.

:

'~

,L___ L-\,,-

I

, ,,

'

. , ·

'

V

· -~

~· •

- · ·:·

...,.~...,,

I

I"

. L..i
"---'
""7L_____J

I.........

..

,
D
.·luD- ~□□
~ -J.:10 : , _ ;
l□' ·cC::S:-,--

I.

'

'

•

5
.
.
_
.
Mr:
"
.
~
:
"
Q w.·
N·.. ,. '; r· • :______ _

..._J_

~

~l,

:n ,_ _

l(_ 1 •.
,d ~
CJ
t :
,,--- I .

~

\

f77l
~

"",.
,,,,

1

~I

r

id

I

===t . J,.____.l,._

TREATMENT

1E9E~ -

(_.J-..~
. l~~
-~[j . ~i ";:
A.

--c::,.:&amp;
,0
··~',.~II':,,
· •~
II1 -1r - E r.

_K

·-

·1-·

J1
I
I

I

r-1~.·l;-~":;;~.: : L' I
1

"

11

"

~ ·ti

"

1

..

IO

I

I.

" .

·, [J:::r : ~ -

- -~ -

,.

~

•

I! . \

LEGEND
EXISTING WASTEWl!.TER TREATMENT PLANT
MAJOR SANITARY SEWER LINES
PRESENT SEIIVIC[ IOUNOARIES

' " ' 1"11[1".ll•IITION

or

T'4tS .....

ro1t

HU CW .. [1

COU IIH' ......,o,1a1, C0 IOll $SI0N w•s '1 NUI C[O • .,

I.

I IIAIIT fllO IIII THC f AIUlll (lt°S HO ME •DMU.l!S TIU,110 N,

UNllCO STAT CS tU'A II ' "' ' " t Of 4Glt1CIJL1U•C ttl'O ·71

....

vilican · lemon a 0110c. inc.
plonnin9
con1ultanl1
MC NAMEE PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS

I

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
EMMET

COUNTY

/"'

C.\LJc1
...
COUNTY

• ••

-

l

(

''ii/ . -.I . L.

R. tW

.

T :S4N

�,

' '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
''''''''
j

j

1

j

j

C

·-~o ,. .~.~.

l

£CI L

-·· · ·-·

8 A Y

itOIIIT

T, J9N,

~

I
I

..
I

)
I
I
I

-------}--

STURGEON

,,
\I
,,

i

'
I

~-----.
I
I

8 A Y

ii

l

: rmiH~

□"'tRU ~11'.
71~.,- -. -□ l Il'.
~R7f ~a-·- - ·i .:. - - ,[~,I
L

-~

~

'

'
1

I(

-#JI!

'

~

T.'8N.

~

--='=rrffl
-~.□·□·'Ir'-,

'
~
l,

er: rt'lrf.

~□c.x::::::J
. ~~
DD~

'
t

I

I \" ~[

I

~

--;;--~

L _ ..,l ....
~ Q·-[SJ
1

. . E.:~ •□ . .t---ihJ'
'
~
.ill ~1M
\~~-" □·~ \ N
D
r i"' '"
-''
•11_,_l-':1 :..

\
nJ
· -· in-·1
·· . •

,
'-;;:_\

.

.

----

n .

II

I

..

1

~.J

L.J

·

- I ·_·.

.

,

- I -':

- - ~--:,,. ..::.. .L.:... _
ST.7
~I, If-=l r-~- " ·7
.. :
.. L_Jd-~------- - ,"_
• ,_ ,' ---.' :, ,_ L.I ...'
-·-,,

· »··

..

-

T-~'---,_L_
""""....,.
·' J _

.. .

'

II

j---~-\,~t-7: .' ;-

. ,c . • • :

J

•

•

r==L___=~u_.:::::

•

'1

I

.-;11r;·
I --.---~..:, " ' •::.-----' ' ---,-- • •

•
· •·--

~c i K

i"

T . 37N.

~

1

i -_

: -

~, , , "· .

n"""

..

I

~

_~1b,_-'--s~1~1···~~
k -==11

_IFl.[I_···:···~ .

-~-- i .
F

=~-·J-17'

\:

•

-

\

--1

m

I

1

-

Ii

,

1· . . . (

·J td

:I -

,.'

C -

II -

I

• -

'

/.

VTII , '.'\¼-f. .
,,,. j

./.§--ir~ :i i. ji ' " :, __ ,.,....,..~ Os
~rT~);
I ~IDJ
' . ' \·[r=""1ii
-~•
•
_.
:
,
_
__J
•,
□
~
~L__
j
:
,
i
:·
EJ·
•
□
·~I·□\
\-_
~:'
.
:-J~:tL
" ~•
·· "1 -- ,,-, ,....~,----•-·"•·- --~- . ___"___ ________J. •-"'r, •,. , w~~
11' , r l

"
,. .
LJLJ
-~~" ~~
ou··. Lb!"' :, Jo'~□·.f\□i ,~-J- .. "
□• " .~
f: •
J ~
c' 10
R. Lul
Rl~ , :,.(
:1~t£ll
.. "' Cl k~l 17 '· -~,. ____,,,
..

·-

[''r····... ····;:1

···~,,

1 ~ •
,,t:

.

1··

JJ

•

I' ' '
0

1

A

'

N

•

wt

_'

v

'

~

--

I

• I ~,

-

--

, - 11

-- C""..·11

-- ll •

~- _

'I

\I ,morn H\fLET

i.

1

"- ,

EJ~ ' ----- ' -----

~ ~'. ··,~

\R •

'r"&lt;
1\ _ S

,--

1~

j

E

~n

~

~

·

L

•

11 ~ , L - '

1

..

ii E

;===cc!-

i

\

-

\i

,,

L

□ -···i-·s--~,-ic\1
:: ,:

./

I,, - .. -

i

,:-

l \\

. • I r:1 ·

:

~

\I. _

_

"

"~

'

,. . ,L_jLJ[_

~\L,__&lt;L.J

-----s:~Pm--H--

~!/..--·'· ....

:J --- "\,. , ,,.

C: I

j

----- I

"

,---·-

,

·

)- ·:-

. r··· ····'-···
.!\.--~••\ !i~
'
s.\:;====:7]r'
:,
I
i' 'l

E

E

r ~- -·- · "'I
![ . [ .
71 Q Jl.:J

Q 11/ ;·-~-·L
. -j~-----··
,
~__J, '""' ,
DL__
'
,, .
••• :•
A V

,

1:

T. 31N

M . AI

, L '",,,,___J .

!!- j

I . .

j L.,.o

--f=:J□ -

I.:

no
·,,
. ··i'\ .

"{

llrTL£

-J

T 3'N

~~~-

TRAVERS£

.........

8 A r

L
~l

ii

... .......,

.I IB :,,: '
:=J5J

!•

~

. I .

. '

LJ
lo=14~lf CljDDn
'c
-~
·~.

'~

J ···

___j._

-~,.

JOU

E

.

A

R

I

. --~.
I
I

;'

_

..

.

•

,

"

"

"

•

• ow

.nl:rl · . ~ ~·
:

1

--~,:1

'IT"""

:

~

•

or

TOIi$ " " "

tOlt TH(

CO tilllll /SSION ..

T,1[ rAIINt:ll 'li

·•-

-

~

-

EXISTING WELLS
EXISTING STORAGE WITH CAPACITY

(t,l lll (T

,1.0JIIIIMISUt4Tl0W •

or ,_,l1111C1,1UUNt:

ltl0 •11

.....
l ( A\.(

I ll

,c1n

vilicon · lemon a ossoc. inc.
planning
con,ultonts
MCNAMEE PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CONSULTING ENGINEERS

•

..

I

I,

•

ll

-"

:----1,7

I

.

•

•

,s n1t1o1o1cto ., "

" 01,U.

:

tr
'r

!

I

.;::'

_.!_
"'-""'"''"o

:·

r.

•

LEGEND

l'IUl'•IIIIAIIO"'

) ~

~□,o·

~..-.

MAJOR WATER MAINS
EXISTING SERVICE AREAS

TN(

~•1

,o

•

I

~

~
.~

//

[

..

~-,... ·I-cr:£1-~ L~b
....

1,;----,

UNIUO IT&amp;TII OIP.,.IITNINT

l,

SPRINGVALE

I
I

"

CHARLE VOIX

G U1N T JltO ..

,

•

~

COUtHT

.,-. ~1ttJ-lJ
f0

~I
~((_
~ ~
•··-·· [ .......,.~.... . ·--. .. _j ..l
·•t

•

-!~

•

-

I

~

1

•

I

"

L_=.__-E

.~

L.1

u

I

EXISTING COMMUNITY WATER SERVICE
EMMET

COUNTY

~

.I

\

COUNTY

~

T 34N

�,

-

NATURAL RESOURCES

(PART I A. 4.)

Emmet County has a diverse resource base that is well adapted to yearround recreation attractions.
This fact, plus the increasing accessibility of the County to tourists from metropolitan centers will cause
accelerated development pressures on the existing resource base. The
momentum of rising tourism, crowded metropolitan centers, new highways, and improved air service may well precipitate local development
related to industrialization and factors other than tourism recreation.
The cumulative impact of the County's latent growth potential will be
accompanied by an urbanization process that will be paralleled by resource depletion . Hence, community water and sewer systems must be
provided to minimize the negative aspects of development . Wood lots
will be converted to building sites, farm lands to neighborhoods, and
lake, river, and stream frontages subdivided in lots . The character
of the County is under pressure to change and as a minimum it will
take community water-sewer systems, good zoning and subdivision control ordinances to assure the most satisfactory patterns of use and
development.
Generally, the processes of urban growth and development results in
the displacement of an area's natural environment. Game habitates,
fishing streams, wooded areas, and farms are displaced by highways,
housing developments, commercial uses and industry. Whether or not
it is feasible to accommodate urban growth and still retain the basic
natural environment remains a challenge to society.
It is known, however, that the continuing pressures of urban growth are placing even
greater demands upon resources which are within commuting distance of
metropolitan centers.
Emmet County's natural resource base must be viewed as an important
element of the ecological structure of Michigan and the Upper Midwest.
Deer hunting, fishing, natural scenery, other outdoor recreation,
and clean waters represent major factors in the local economy and
are attractions which account for the increasing demands upon the
rural environment. As more freeways develop north from Chicago and
Detroit, the impact of urban growth on the County can be expected to
increase substantially.
While it will not be possible to resolve all the County's ecological
and environmental questions in a planning study, it is an objective
of the plan to suggest development patterns that will recognize the
mutual needs of urban uses and the natural resource base.
Implementating the development patterns will be an evolving long-term program
necessitating strong cooperation among citizens of the County, resource
specialists, land developers and government.

-

23 -

�Some selected natural resources of concern in Emmet County are deer
yards, trout streams, warm water fish streams, canoeable rivers and
principal drainage basins. As a general observation, deer yarding
areas, canoeable waters and the quality trout streams are concentrated
in nearly the same County locations. These resource areas also provide habitat for other game species native to Northern Michigan.
Hence, efforts to preserve these areas in their natural state will
fulfill numerous conservation objectives including a quality outdoor
recreational environment for future generations.
The drainage patterns on the map relate rivers and streams to their
principal watershed areas . It is important that land users in the
County recognize these drainage patterns as certain activities may
contribute to stream pollution or resource depletion. The County
cannot afford these losses if it is to retain the Northern image so
attractive to urban populations which tour the United States.
SOILS
The accompanying 11 Soil Resources 11 map illustrates a refinement of the
County's Land Type map, and presents ten (10) relatively homogenous
soil groups. These soil classifications are based upon their general
physical similarity.
Soils in a group have similar capacity to sustain urban uses and resources development. This map gives a broad
picture of the distribution and comparative quantity of County soil
resources.
Because of the generalized nature of the mapped information,
it is applicable to County planning as an overall development guide or
reference, More detailed soils surveys and/or on-site investigations
are needed for specific uses and site planning.
In determin~ng the general suitability of soils in their natural state
for various uses, the following criterion are applied by soil scientists
of the U.S. Soil Conservation Service:
1.
2,
3.
4.

Adaptability
Adaptability
Adaptability
Adaptability

for
for
for
for

Agriculture
Housing (subdivision type)
Woodland and Forest Use
Recreation

A summary rating of the ten (10) generalized Soil Resource Areas is
presented on TABLE 11.
It is pertinent that about 70% of the area of Emmet County has soil
conditions that are suited to urban development uses.
This also
implies a general suitability for forestry, agriculture and recreation.

-

24 -

�' '

~

1

.

1

~

...

"I

'I

1 1J 1 i

i

•

i

'

i

'

,

i i

'

,1

1

i

I

1 1 1

C E CI L

STURGEON

8 A

r

~

'l(:,

t
(,

t

l
i• ~ l . ;:
.
[Ju.L__j
----- -----J~s&gt;-----

•

71. . . \, .

"'
"
"
L I TT l. £

TRAVERSE

8

A

r

rl
tr

~f~

·rt,
.
~-:... r . ,
~

•

If

• I.I

·-

11

.

1
~~~~L_ ltLJ,
,~
~

GR OU PS

I

'TH( •11•11 ... TlOOI 0, 1..1 WU ''"'""°°'4U
•10tllllMCk&gt;ONAUOfUl.OU... l!fO,ooTOfl'l&gt;IPIIIIMl! .. I
Of H0USttl0AHOIIUAHl&gt;t¥!10,,._l,.I. 1/l'fOU TH( Ill

ilfr:E::rf::::::·:~:~f2!;~::::.

.....
Generalized
vilicon · lemon a ouoc. inc .
plonn l nQ

con sultonta

ISOIL
EMMET

RESOURCES

COUNTY

COUNTY

EMMET SANDY L OAM

a

LOAMY SAND

2
3
4
5
6

ST. IGNACE· LON GR IE - ALPENA

7

DUNE

8
9
IQ

BLUE LAKE - LEELANAU
EA S T LAKE - BLUE LAKE - KALKASKA
RUBICON

SANO

EAST LAKE - AU GRES

LANO - DEER PARK

BRIMLE Y- BRUCE -WAI NOLA

IOSCO - THOMAS

BREVORT

CARBONDALE - TAWAS - ROSCOMMON

SOURCE : U. S . SOtL CONSERVATION

SERVICE

�TABLE 11
COUNTY SOIL RESOURCES
Emmet County

Agriculture
Good

Subdividing

L

Sandy Loam

2.

Loamy Sand

Fair-Good

Good

3.

Deep Loamy Sand

Fair-Good

Good

4.

Deep Acid Sands

Poor

5.

Sand and Gravel

6.

Use Rating or Adaptability
Recreation-Woodland

Drainage

Good

Good

Hardwoods and Pine

Good

Good

Hardwoods and Pine

Good

Good

Good-Fair

Poor

Good

Poor

Fair-Good

Poor

Fair-Poor

Fair

Sand Gravel over
Bedrock

Poor

Fair-Poor

Poor

Fair-Poor

Poor

7.

Sand Dunes

Poor

Poor

Poor

8.

Silts, Clays, Sand

Poor

Poor

Fair

Fair-Good

Poor

9•

Silty Clay Loam

Poor

Poor

Poor

Fair-Good

Poor

Organic Soil

Poor

Poor

Poor

Game Habitat

Poor

Good

Hardwoods

Fair-Good

N

u,

10.

SOURCE:

U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Boyne City, Michigan

Good

Good

�Resort and Bear Creek Townships have from 85% to 90% of their lands
in soils suited to urban development. This is important because these
communities are expected to absorb most of the projected urban development in the County.
It · is unfortunate that soils rated very good for
farming and forestry may be displaced by development in the Petoskey
area.
Vast land areas in the central and west central portions of Emmet
County are well suited for urban and recreation development.
This
means that ski chalets and summer home development can proceed with
few soil limitations. However, there are other planning considerations
necessary to assure that new developments do not destroy the quality
of the natural environment which generates demands for use~and development. Deer yarding areas and sport fishing streams will need protection.
Crooked Lake, Pickerel Lake and the Crooked River Valley through Alanson are positioned among wet soils rated fair to poor for urban use.
Since this is an intensive resort-cottage area, pollution control
measures will become increasingly necessary and a strong need is already apparent.
The Cross Village area is divided among several soil types:
sandy
loams, loose sand and organic soils. The organic soils are generally
in State ownership and hence, may not be a development problem.
However, the loose sands, which occur in dunes and ridges have many development limitations in terms of drifting sand (wind, erosi~n) and difficulty in establishing and maintaining cover.
Development of these
soils will reduce the high scenic value of the area, as many dunes
will be leveled and existing tree stands will be gradually reduced.
The Mackinaw City area and Wawatam Township are on limeston~ formations
and cobbly soils.
These are generally unsuitable for urban•development in their natural state.
Careful and detailed soils analysis can
reveal the nature of development limitations on particular sites.

A

large proportion of the soils unsuited for development are in the
north areas of the County. Also, much of this land is currently in
State of Michigan ownership, as part of the Hardwood State Forest.

- 26 -

�TOPOGRAPHY
The accompanying topography map illustrates the slope characteristics
of Emmet County's natural landscape.
From a County-wide view, there
is a great deal of variety in land formations, which include:
flat
lands, gently rolling, rolling to steep, and very steep slopes.
Elevation gradually increases from north to south, with some of the
highest hilltops in Pleasantview and Springvale Townships.
The discussion which follows describes the topographic characteristics
of each Township in the County. As a general statement, there are a
number of areas that have limitations to development in terms of
urban density development. However, these limitations become scenic
attractions in communities that cater to tourism-recreation activities.
Resort

Topography in Resort Township is gently rolling
with picturesque contrasts between cultivated farm
land and patches of wooded area.
Some steep landscape follows the Lake Michigan Shoreline, mostly
in the Penn-Dixie mining area.

Bear Creek

- Land forms in Bear Creek Township tend to be more
severe than in Resort.
From a development point of
view, it is well that the incidence of steep topography lies well south and southeast of Petosk~y and
can be avoided by expanding urban development.
Some
10 sections of land are affected by steep topography.

Springvale

- Except for areas generally within two miles of Crooked
Lake, Pickerel Lake, and the Minihaha Creek Valley,
Springvale Township is influenced by steep slopes.
Not all of this area can be considered prohibitive
to development, but it does present some severe
limitations.
The flat areas around the lakes are
separated from rolling lands by a large band of
steep slope area,

Littlefield

- Topography has almost no development limitation
on this community.
Some moderate to steep slopes
exist in the extreme northwest area.

Little Traverse - The southern tiers of sections in this Township are
generally flat or gently rolling, although incidences
of steep slope are present. A large area of steep ·
topography affects the eight sections in the northeast area,
West Traverse

- Topography in West Traverse Township varies from
rolling to steep and is steep in most sections.
The rolling and gently rolling land is found north
of Harbor Springs and east to the Township line.

- 27 -

�Friendship

- Except for some areas near Stutsmanville and Middle
Village, Friendship is characterized by moderately
steep to steep topography.
Other incidences of flat
and gently rolling land is scattered among the steeper
slope lands.

Pleasantview

- A band of flat land extends north-south through this
community.
Steep to very steep topography is found
in the southwest and southeast areas, where the Boyne
Highlands and Nubs Nob ski resorts are located. Moderate to steep slopes are found in the northwest and
northeast sections.

Maple River

The west one-third of this community has moderate to
moderately steep topography but few steep areas.
The
land character in the east sections is flat with some
incidence of swamp.

McKinley

- McKinley Township has a varied land character.
Extensive swamp land is positioned along the east line
and flat but drier sections extend along the south.
Some nine sections in the northwest portion are
moderately rolling, with very little incidence of
steep,

Center

- Rolling to moderate slope areas are found in the extreme northeast sections, while moderately steep to
steep topography influences a large area in the southwest. A wide band of flat land (high incidence of
swamp) traverses the community from southeast to
northwest.

Readmond

- Readmond Township's physiography resembles Friendship. Most of the landscape is characterized by
moderately steep slopes and there are incidences of
steep.
Gently rolling and moderate slopes are found
in the north and west areas and in the sections near
Good Hart.
There is considerably more developable
land along Lake Michigan in Readmond than in Friendship.

Cross Village

- Steep topography is limited to the Mccort Hill area
in Section 5 and in portions of Sections 2 and 3.
A steep ridge parallels the shore of Lake Michigan
from the south to the Wycamp Lake area,
Rolling
sand dunes are found in the northern sections.

- 28 -

�Bliss

- Bliss Township is predominantly flat with incidences
of swamp.
Some moderately steep landscape is located in the central, south and southeast area.
Incidences of steep slope can be found near Bliss
Center and among the sand dunes along Lake Michigan.

Carp Lake

- Gently rolling to moderately rolling topography is
present in the southwesterly seven and one-half
(7 1/2) sections. The remainder of the community
is relatively flat and there are swamp lands to the
southwest and northwest.

Wawatam ·

- Overall, Wawatam Township has the flattest topography
in Emmet County.
The topography map reveals only a
gradual fall in elevation from the southeast to
north Township Line.

The foregoing analysis of the County's physiography is limited in respect to detail.
U.S.G,S. data on a County-wide scale at the 20 foot
contour interval is effective as a general reference for slope data,
but cannot illustrate the variety of slope change that can occur within a given 20 foot interval.

DRAINAGE PATTERNS
In addition to indicating slope, topography defines the surface drainage pattern of the County. This information is useful in water-sewer
system planning, because the drainage pattern influences the extension
of sanitary sewer mains. Whenever a topographic barrier is encountered,
there are specific construction costs related to the following:
excess pipe to circumvent the barrier.
lift stations, force mains and booster pumps to overcome a change
in elevation.
costly excavations to maintain satisfactory grades on the collector
mains.
possible need for duplicate treatment facilities (lagoons, plants,
etc.).
additional time needed for installation of the system.
Following are some general observations relative to sanitary sewer
service areas based upon the County's principal drainage pattern:
A sewage system in Pellston would have the physical capacity to
serve a large regional area.
Pellston is also a potential industrial area.

-

29 -

�,
Alanson is reasonably well situated to serve a large·drainage area.
Although new industry may be limited, recreation, tourists, and
year-round home demands will be significant.
Poor soils and flat
terrain suggest a serious need for urban services in the Alanson,
Oden, Crooked Lake area.
Large areas of Bear Creek Township fall within the natural drainage
pattern of Petoskey's sewage collection and treatment system . However, east Pickerel Lake and East Mitchell Roads lie in another
drainage basin .
Most of Resort Township's drainage pattern lies in basins which do
not run toward Petoskey. Natural drainage is in the direction of
Walloon Lake .
Harbor Springs has a large drainage area, Hence, the City can be
analyzed as a source of sewage treatment for surrounding Township
areas that are urbanizing.
Cross Village is positioned just south of the dividing line of two
drainage basins.
The northernmost areas of Emmet County lie in two principal basins;
Bliss Township is in the westerly basin and WaWatam Township is
easterly. Carp Lake and Wawatam Townships are largely in the Carp
River basin. The Village of Mackinaw City is in a sub-basin.
All of the drainage basins on the map reflect large overall drainage
patterns . Within each there are small sub-basins that would affect
the detailed engineering of specific community sewage collection
systems.
WATER RESOURCES
In Emmet County, a prime use of water resources is for recreation,
mainly in terms of swimming, boating, fishing and wildlife management.
Howev er, water resources are necessary for municipal water systems,
individual wells for domestic water and irrigation . Hence, it is
essential that the County's water resources are protected from pollution and depletion.
Lake Michigan is a major water reserve for recrea~ion as well as municipal water supplies in the Petoskey area. Municipal water in Harbor
Springs is obtained from ground sources via four wells .
For the most
part, the r emaining County areas rely on individual wells .
On the basis of general state-wide data prepared by the Water Resources
Commission of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, most of
the area of Emmet County is in glacial deposit areas with fairly high
yields of ground water.
The lower yield areas are found mostly in
Resort Township, Wawatam Township and northern Bliss Township . However, individual wells in specific locations may have high or low
yields depending on local geologic conditions.
- 30 -

�In addition to Lake Michigan and ground water resources, community
water systems may be developed from rivers and smaller lakes.
Emmet
County has seven (7) inland lakes, of which three are positioned in
urban growth areas (Round Lake, Crooked Lake and Pickerel Lake). Also,
the U. S. Soil Conservation Service has identified nine (9) potential
water impoundment locations on the rivers of the County.
For the most
part, surface water resources other than Lake Michigan, would only be
of use in recreation-resort locations, and detailed engineering
feasibility will be necessary to determine the suitability of any
surface water for domestic consumption.
Some discussion of the quality of domestic water resources is contained
in Part III of this "Sewer and Water Plan'' report .

- 31 -

�AGRICULTURE, LAND PATTERNS, AND TRENDS : (PART I A. 5.)
Farming and agricultural activities have two major influences on each
community. First is the income derived for rural families and other
services that are supported by farming.
Second is the value of farms
as a resource for open space, wildlife support, and environmental
breaks with developed urban areas.
Farming has become a highly complex operation requiring skilled operators and huge investments in mechanical equipment and land.
This
is evidenced by the fact that the average value of farms in Emmet
County increased 135% between 1954 and 1964. Also, the character of
farming i s moving in two directions, one of increasing farm acreage
and the other toward intensive farming where crops are scientifically
managed to include complete climate control. Over and above this is
the influx of artificial foods; items developed through laboratory
chemistry.
Part of the national trend in agriculture can be observed from TABLE
12, which summarizes selected farm data for Emmet County.
In the 10
years between 1954 and 1964, the average size of a farm increased by
nearly 50 acres or 32% , Overall, there was a 51% decrease in the number of farms in the County.
Employment also decreased markedly .
In
1950, the U.S . Census listed 632 persons employed as farmers and -farm
managers.
By 1960, this occupation group declined to 228 for a percentage loss of 64% .
While farm size has been increasing and the number of farms and total
acreage has been decreasing, farm production has been increasing along
with the average value per farm.
This is a good index of the economic
advantages of the large scale farm and why this trend is taking place.
Better and more productive yields are taking place.
TABLE 13 shows the value of farm products
1959, the value has increased nearly 38%,
State of Michigan.
The trend since 1954,
as there was a decline from 1954 to 1959,
and 1964.

sold in Emmet County .
Since
compared with 23% for the
however, is not as optimistic
and an increase between 1959

Of the two categories, livestock and corps, it is evident that livestock farms are most valuable.
Between 1959 and 1964, livestock farm
product sales increased $528,000 compared with $208,000 for crops.
Dairy and poultry were the most important growth factors, as other
livestock increased slightly.
Field crops accounted for over 60% of the sales increase among crops.
Forest products and vegetables gained some, while fruits and nuts
experienced sales decreases,

- 32 -

�TABLE 12
SELECTED FARM CHARACTERISTICS
Emmet County

Farms by Size
1 - 99 acres
100 - 499 acres
500 - 999 acres
1,000 acres and over
Totals

Land in Farms
% of County Land in Farms
Average size of Farms
Average Value of Farms
Farm Operators residing
on farm

Farm Census
1964
1954
382
439
13
3

145
247
17
4

-237
-192
+ 4
+ 1

-

837

413

-424

-

51%

123,478

80,841

-

35%

42%

27%

148
acres

196
acres

+ 32%
acres
+136%

$ 16,698

+$9,680

512

389

-123

1,682

U.S. Census of Agriculture

- 33 -

62%
44%
+ 31%
+ 33%

+ 48
acres

$ 7,019

Persons in Farm Operator
households

SOURCE:

1954 to 1964
Change
No.
%

-

24~

�TABLE 13
VALUE OF FARM PRODUCTS SOLD
Emmet County

All Products Sold
Farm Average
Crops

1954

1959

1964

$1,715,495

$1,311,707

$2,071,272

1,943

2,484

5,015

834,220

451,066

659,119

338,828

243,963

381,121

a.

Field Crops

b.

Vegetables

25,848

33,390

55,832

c.

Fruits and Nuts

28,744

30,376

15,751

d.

Forest Products

440,800

143,337

206,415

881,275

860,641

1,389,415

61,540

34,715

261,994

Livestock
a.

Poultry

b.

Dairy

561,606

390,355

651,230

c.

Livestock

258,129

435,571

476,191

SOURCE:

1964 and 1959 United States Census of Agriculture, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Vol . 1, Part
13, Michigan.

- 34 -

�A final assessment of the value of agriculture to Emmet County can be
established from a general rule of thumb, that each dollar earned in
farming turns over about 2.3 times. Hence, the $2.07 million produced
from farm sales in the County has an estimated multiplied impact of
some $4,761,000.
This is a significant local economic factor that
should be retained to the fullest extent possible .
In Emmet County, owner occupied farm trends may be estimated from data
on farm operators residing on farms.
The 1964 Census of Agriculture
showed that 94% of the County's farm operators resided on the farm.
Also, the average farm supports a resident population of 4.07 persons,
well above the average County household size of 3 , 33 persons.
The fu ture of agriculture in Emmet County is uncertain, because of
national events and local pressures for land that may or may not
occur. The trend, however, shows farm acreage declining, and farm
population declining.
However, the value and size of a farm is increasing.
It is reasonable to conclude that the value of farm land will increase
as a result of tourist demands for rural land.
This will cause farm
acreage to decline further, lessening the impact of agriculture as an
economic activity (employer).
Farm productivity may decline as well .
On the other hand, national-international demands for farm products
may give new economic incentives for preserving and expanding vital
agricultural activity.
In terms of the relative importance of agriculture, Emmet County
ranked 57th among the 82 counties in farm product sales. Hence, 57
counties are agriculturally more significant. Another index shows
that Emmet County has a high percentage of nonfarm income to supplement farm product sales (17th of 82). This is an index showing decreasing reliance upon farming activity for basic income.
LAND PATTERNS
The a c companying map illustrates the generalized existing land use
pattern in Emmet County. TABLE 14 summarizes the acreages and proportions of uses by Township areas and City-Village areas. APPENDIX
TABLES 1 and 5 present the detailed land use acreages for each community with totals for the principal Supervisory Districts.
It is
noted that whenever City-Village data is statistically portrayed,
only that portion of Mackinaw City, which lies in Emme t County, is
included . No land use data for the Cheboygan side has been tabulated,
however, it was inventoried and mapped. Also, data for Petoskey and
Harbor Springs were taken from land use studies prepared for those
communities under separate planning programs.

- 35 -

�-

-

-'
0
0

"

u

~

"
...
►

..
.... " ..;:;i
... ..
-'

.."'

+'
,r,

::,

~

"'

!

.."
..
-'

0

~
.J

z

0

...

..
" "'"' .,.!. z
..,
:
:, "
"
0

4iif"

.,

ID

:,

~

:,

0
:,:

~

..,

.J

;::

+'
~

¥"

z
2

~

I-

"'a:

w

.,0 "'ua:"

..

a:

0

"'u
:::;

..
ID

:,

.
QII

&lt;..,

0

0

0

'-I

,-

4

2

◄

j

;:

.."
...
..
4

z

"

@)

::,

....

"

0

...►

►

2

::,
0

"z
:;

u

.,
0

z

&lt;(

.J

u
.J

..

ID

:,

.,
"'a: "'..,a:

IIll
0
IL

..

.J
&lt;(

;:;
a:

.J

::!

a:

u
I"' :::; "" .,
., "' ::,0
:,
"'2 ;!,
.,
I&lt;(

I-

..

□~II~

~

¥'
,-

-

w

en

+"

:::)

~
r
¥"
...

0

z

~

&lt;t
_J

~

"'"'

¥"'

"'

J

,_

"'...

.,

.."'

,._

¥"'

"'

....

..

&gt;(!)~

..

z~

i=u

"'

l.:w" '

"....

Cf)t-

...

·: □

-1&amp;.1

X::E

-11--.11--

tr

,

~=:

..
+'

,,...

...

.

co.

~ /;;,:·:~)\

~

.... -

cl.
:)rr
Q-,,

z-""

J
:

.

•

I

.

~= .

.

W C

~ L

•'

:IE:
a

"" ~(~ ~
·"'&gt;r--i
~d___j •

,.:J

""

w!

~
~

/
. , ....i

/

,.

-► --'fl"

3

)I

7

•

§ ~

.
"

C

�TABLE 14
EXISTING LAND USE
Emmet County

All To'wnshiE..§_
Residential

703 acres

To·t al Counti
2,094 acres

Percent
DeveloEed Total
9.1%

778

37

815

3. 6%

Public

2,357

154

2,511

10.9%

Quasi-Public

2,754

301

3,055

13.4%

Recreation

7,372

206

7,578

33.1%

Commercial

203

129

332

1.5%

Industrial

429

114

543

2.4%

Railroads

374

102

476

2.1%

4,830

635

5,465

23.9%

Seasonal Homes

w

1,391 acres

· Cities g Villa~es

0)

Roads
Total Uses

Vacant, Farm g
Forest
Surface Water
GRAND TOTAL

20,488 acres

2,381 acres

22,869 acres

100.0%

7 . 8%

2 58,932

3,453

262,415

88.9%

9,485

301

9,756

3 . 3%

2 88,905 acres

6,135 acres

295,040 acres

100 . 0 %

�Inventory Techniques
The study of land use in the Comprehensive Plan has several objectives
related to understanding the County's present development and guiding
future planning decisions.
Foremost, the land use inventory provides
both a graphic and statistical picture of the County, emphasing the
impact of man-made features.
The inventory of existing land use was accomplished by field inspections, conducted during the summer of 1968. Each use of land was
recorded on field maps and later transcribed to base maps. The field
inspection technique is not 100% accurate since all uses in buildings
are not apparent from the street and there may be uses in wooded areas
and on large private properties generally inaccessible by vehicle.
Common limitations are accurate counts of apartments within multiple
family dwellings and seasonal homes in forested areas.
Overall,
however, the field inspection technique is a valuable means of assessing the character of uses, and it consumes less time and cost than
other inventory systems (such as reviewing all tax records or photographic interpretation). Nevertheless, aerial photographs, U. S.G.S .
maps, and interviews of local officials were used to resolve questions
on property usage.
It should also be noted that the use of land
changes continually in all communities, hence, the data must be v iewed
in terms of the date inventoried.
Use Classifications
Because there are many and varied uses of property in Emmet County,
it is necessary to calssify them into meaningful groups. This is
essential to assist in analyzing the information as well as to
simplify understanding the total picture .
Following is a list of how the County land uses were classified:
Residential

- Includes three separate categories:
One-family
dwellings, two-family dwellings, and dwellings
with three or more units.
Cottages and seasonal
homes were also inventoried.

Commercial

- For ease of statistical analysis, all retail and
business uses are grouped into one category. However, each use was inventoried and it is possible
to show shopping center uses, tourist lodging and
general commercial activities .

Industrial

- Identifies manufacturing industries, welding services, machine shops, cabinet shops, saw mills and
similar uses primarily involving the production,
processing and fabrication of goods . Also, warehouses, truck terminals, enclosed and open storage,
junk yards, bulk fuel depots, gravel pits, contractor yards, lumber yards and similar activities .

-

37 -

�Public

Quasi-Public

- All governmental uses and buildings including schools.
Includes municipal offices, hospitals, D.P.W. garages
and yards, fire stations, community buildings, libraries, post offices, the County Airport, public
cemeteries and similar uses.
Includes uses which are semipublic in nature, such
as:
churches, parochial schools, fraternal lodges,
utility substations, private cemeteries, Country
Clubs, Ski Resorts, private parks, radio and TV
Towers, etc.

Parks

- Public recreation uses, including parks, public access sites, playgrounds, roadside parks, campgrounds
and related.
Includes the Petoskey and Wilderness
State Parks, but not State Forest Land.

Streets and
Railroads

- Includes alleys, streets, roads, highways and railroads in use as of the summer of 1968.

Water

- All principal bodies of surface water including the
measurable waters of the Crooked River.
Lake
Michigan harbor waters are not included.

Vacant, Farm
and Forest

- Encompasses unused open land in tracts or lots, farm
land except dwelling areas, and forested areas.

Emmet County's total area is 461 square miles, which is equivalent to
295,040 acres.
Of this area, less than eight percent is used for housing, business, industry, community services, recreation and transportation. Another three percent is in major surface water area, including inland lakes and the Crooked River.
Some 88.9% of the County
is land classified as vacant, farm and forest,
Lands in vacant, farm
and forest are most apt to be consumed by other uses as the County
grows.
Soils, topography, land ownership and the economic strength of
farming will determine those lands that will be consumed first.
As an illustration of existing County development, all of the County's
roads, highways, railroads, parks, airports, and other land uses, except farmed or forested land could roughly fit into the area of one
Township (McKinley for example). That is if all of the urban uses
and services were concentrated. However, every community has varying
amounts of development and uses are widely scattered throughout .
At the present time, the Cities and Villages of the County have over
3,453 acres of undeveloped land.
If future permanent housing were to
concentrate in Village-City areas where central utility services may
be available or could be provided, the County could absorb nearly
8,000 new families without losing one acre of farm land. The Township's of course have vast areas of open land that could be developed.

- 38 -

�POTENTIAL FOR RECREATION AND TOURISM
The potentials for recreation and tour•ism in Emmet County must be
viewed in terms of the position of the County in Michigan, and the
availability of quality resources and existing recreation developments designed to accommodate tourists .
Situated in the northern most portion of the Lower Peninsula, Emmet
County has landscape features and environmental characteristics which
differ significantly from down state areas.
This of itself is a
major attraction force, as people from crowded metropolitan areas
travel northward to benefit from cooler climatic conditions, cleaner
outdoor air and unpolluted waters. To the extent that these resources
can be protected from despoliation, the transient tourist economy will
continue to grow at a rapid pace.
Regional Potentials
Millions of people live within a days drive from Emmet County, and
the trip becomes easier and safer as freeway construction continues
northward.
Tourists in Emmet County travel from many states and
foreign countries, but are primarily from Michigan, Ohio, Indiana
and Illinois. Regional access is provided by freeways, highways,
airports and the Great Lakes waterways.
Resource Potential
The resources of Emmet County were described in previous sections of
this report. However, the greatest potential for tourism-recreation
is related to the waters of Lake Michigan. Winter tourist visitation
is enhanced by major ski resorts developed among prominent topographic
features.
Hence, topography, climate and water oriented recreation
combine favorably in the County and improved regional access (I-75)
permits increased patronage. At this writing, some undeveloped
shoreline remains along Lake Michigan and on some inland lakes o If
these areas are "walled off" by development, the general potential
for tourism-recreation will be more restricted.
It is recommended
that the sand dune areas north of Cross Village be included in a
public recreation area. This will prevent an outstanding resource
area from the ravages of soil erosion and septic tank pollution .
The inherent recreation values of resources in the County reflect
the continued losses and depletion of resources in metr' opoli tan areas.
Strong efforts will be needed to establish water and sewer serv ices
in resource areas where recreation home development may threaten the
quality of lakes, streams and ground water.

-

39 -

�Cultural Potential
Emmet County has a history rich with cultural interest . The history
of the Indian community is colorful and relates closely with miss'ionary
activities in the region. This is substantiated by the numerous
monuments and historical markers throughout the County . Fort Michilmackinac is another major historical-cultural feature that attracts
thousands of visitors annually.
Efforts are now underway to establish an Indian Cultural Center north of Petoskey. If effectively
implemented, this center could become a major attraction feature for
tourists and at the same tj~e provide cultural educational services,
Economic Potential
If tourism-recreation is to have its full potential realized, there
must be provision for private investment. A major investment in yearround tourism development is Boyne Highlands.
Some other significant
private investments in tourism-recreation include:
Nubs Nob Ski Resort;
Country Clubs; Bay View Association; Harbor Point Association;
Wequetonsing Association; Hidden Hamlet and similar recreation home
developments; marinas; campgrounds; fee fishing ponds; and numerous
motel-hotel accommodations throughout the County.
Based on the Commercial Economic Base Analysis for Emmet County, total
tourist spending in fiscal 1962 - 1963 was estimated at about $13 . 7
million . This increased by about 50% through 1966-1967, for a total
volume of about $20.0 million. As long as metropolitan growth continues as in the past, increases of this magnitude can be expected
to continue .
Using established rates, tourist spending has been increasing at about
16% annually . If the trend continues, tourist spending may reach some
$140,000,000 by 1990. This reflects strong and continuing gains in
the tourist economy of Emmet County.
TRENDS IN COMMERCIAL USES
As a general land use standard commercial uses in urban communities
make up about three (3) percent of the developed land area,
In
Emmet County, the percentage of commercial land is 1.5%, However,
these two figures are not fully comparable because of the large
acreages of County land in roads, highways, regional community services and large recreation sites tend to distort percentage relationships.

- 40 -

�On the basis of the land use inventory several physical trends were
discernible among commercial land uses.
These are summarized:
1.

The City of Petoskey provides region-wide retail services and
has the largest concentration of commercial land use . Of some
272 retail establishments in the County, 143 are in Petoskey
(53%). Remodeling, expansion and the development of new centers
in and near Petoskey reflect the strength of this retail community.
The tourist impact is noted from numerous retail establishments that close during the winter months .

2.

Harbor Springs is another important retail center, that reflects
strong tourist activity in the summer season.
Resort homes and
harbor facilities reflect seasonal trends to a high degree.
New
and remodeled stores indicate good trade area drawing power.

3.

Alanson is in a growing market area reflected by the fair to good
condition of stores as well as traffic activity in th€ retail
center . Some market may be lost to competing centers because of
congestion and lack of convenient parking.

4.

Mackinaw City has a high tourist impact that is evident from
seasonally operated stores and numerous tourist services (motels,
restaurants, gifts, etc.).
Several new establishments reflect a
steady tourist market.

In the smaller community areas, particularly the rural townships,
commercial uses are operating on a more marginal basis.
Some stores
have been abandoned and there are fewer retail services because of a
decline in the year-round population. However, several quality tourist
services are established in rural areas.
In the urban influenced townships, new commercial uses are locating along County roads and Sta~e
Highway's. This is a reflection of broader market areas, scarcity of
land in established centers, and the need for larger business sites .
Retail Sales
One of the more accurate indices of retail-commercial trends are sales
statistics o Based on the data published in the U. S. Census of Business
Reports, Emmet County has attained a consistent record of retail
growth .

- 41 -

�TABLE 15
RETAIL SALES BY YEAR
Emmet County
Year

Reported Sales

1958
1963
1967

$24,930,000
$29,977,000
$38,109,000

SOURCE:

U. S. Census of Business

It is significant that total retail sales in Emmet County increased
by $13.2 million since 1958 . Not counting the impact of inflation
this is a gross sales increase of 52.9%.
Some other significant trends show the following:
Emmet County is holding its relative position in terms of percent
of sales retained in the three County Regi0n of Charlevoix,
Cheboygan and Emmet.
The County share of retail services increased in the three County
Region of Charlevoix, Cheboygan and Emmet.
County areas outside of the City of Petoskey attained a larger
share of the total County sales .
Retail Center Plans
Future retailing in Emmet County cannot be measured with· the same accuracy as past and existing trends.
However, all of the projection
indices of metropolitan growth, local population increases, and tour..i.st
business projections established a sound economic basis upon which to
plan retail center improvements.
The actual impact of future development within the major trade areas of the County will determine which
centers can be improved or expanded to the greatest degree.

- 42 -

�Retailing in Emmet County has a bright future in terms of the following:
The County is a geographic terminus for tourist travel in the
northern Lower Peninsula. It is a major destination area.
Interstate freeways link the region with growing metropolitan
centers . There is excellent access from Detroit and Chicago
oriented routes are improving.
The County is centrally located within a complex of major ski
resorts and benefits from year-round tourist business on a high
level.
Local population growth is progressing at a reasonable rate, and
gains have occurred in diversified manufacturing.
Although the County has experienced growth, much of the development
has concentrated in the Petoskey-Harbor Springs area.
Several northern
Townships are expected to hold a stable permanent population, with some
slight growth.
If past trends continue, a few rural Townships may
lose population.
Following is a summary of retail center plans for Emmet County:
1.

Petoskey CBD Plan
The long range development plan of Petoskey's Central Business
District is described and illustrated in detail in the report
and plan of Petoskey's Central Business District a separate
report funded by the HUD "701" Program, The overall objective
of Petoskey's CBD Plan is to create a central community area
that is attractive and can function as the comparison shopping
and governmental focal point of a wide regional area; including
rural Emmet County.

2.

Harbor Springs
The City of Harbor Springs has a sound base upon which to plan
future retail center improvements. These relate to the high
value investments in seasonal homes in and adjacent to the City,
large marine facilities and services, and the increasing popularity of winter sports activities in nearby areas .
In the County Plan, Harbor Springs is classified as a major convenience center and has a large convenience trade area.
It is
expected that the City will expand as a major retail center in
the County and probably will progress to include more comparison
shopping facilities.
Specific plans for Harbor Springs retail center have not been prepared as a part of this report, since the City is engaged in a
separate comprehensive planning program .
-

43 -

�3.

Mackinaw City
Although the central retail area of Mackinaw City is not in Emmet
County, this community and the City of Cheboygan exert a strong
trade influence in the northern Townships of Emmet County . For
the purposes of Emmet County's retail center plan, it is assumed
that Mackinaw City will pursue programs to plan and improve retail
areas .
Hence, the City will retain or increase its share of the trad e
area's retail market .
Being positioned out of the County, no specific retail center plans
for Mackinaw City have been prepared .

4.

Minimum Convenience Centers
In addition to the larger City retail trade centers, there are.
several villages and unincorporated places that provide minimum
retail facilities.
These minimum retail centers provide services
ranging from a general store to several shopping center uses, as
in the Village of Alanson.
In addition to a general store, however, the minimum convenience centers are supported by tourist
lodging facilities and perhaps some general commercial activity
as well.
Following is a description of the six Minimum Convenience Centers
in Emmet County. The basic design principles expressed in these
plans relate to:
Consolidation of scattered retail uses into expanded retail
shopping centers.
Provision for off-street parking to increase retail sales
capacity.
The addition of landscaped areas and street trees to make the
centers more attractive.
a.

Alanson Center
Behind Petoskey and Harbor Springs, the Village of Alanson is
the third largest retail center in Emmet County. Alanson's
retail activity should be concentrated on US-3 1 with parking
behind the stores. If possible, a large community park should
be developed aiong the Crooked River. This would attract
tourists, boating enthusiasts and fishermen who use the River
at Alanson. A large central park i ng lot would be able to serve
the retail stores as well as the park facility.

- 44 -

�b.

Carp Lake Center
Retail services in Carp Lake are largely tourist oriented, and
there are numerous tourist lodging facilities situated around
the Lake (Paradise Lake), Existing center uses include:
two
gasoline stations, one marina and boat livery, one sporting
goods and hardware store, a grocery store and several motels
and cabin courts. The existing pattern of development is
crowded, there being little room for expansion and very limited
parking.
Future expansion at the Carp Lake Center will be difficult and
expensive to achieve because of existing development . However,
if an expanded market is desired, two critical objectives must
be reached.
First, the retail area must be enlarged to provide
room for building expansion and off-street parking.
Second,
some landscaped open space should be provided to develop open
views of Paradise Lake.

c.

Cross Village Center
The retail potential of Cross Village is strongly oriented to
the summer tourist season. However, it is reasonable to expect
some lake lot subdivisions to result in year-round resort dwellings. Also, there are a number of farms located in the surrounding area to support basic services.
Cross Village's retail inventory includes: two gasoline stations,
two gift shops, one grocery store, a large inn, and small snack
bar. The plan for future development illustrates a gradual
"filling in" of retail uses between these basic uses . Offstreet parking is located so as to serve the retail stores
and act as scenic turnouts for views over Lake Michigan.
Landscaped setbacks are sugges~ed for State Road to evolve into a
scenic route to the sand beaches and boat landing, which may
be expanded into a larger marina or harbor.

d.

Levering Center
Retail services in Levering are limited to one hardware store,
although several other commercial services are located on US31, out of the Village's former retail center .
Levering's plan is based on the potential attraction force of
a "County Ghost Town".
The original retail shops are mostly
vacant, as former retail enterprises have ceased or moved to
US-31. Another possibility is the development of a pre-1900
retail street. Under this possibility, the existing buildings would be restored to their original design.
The main
street could be cobblestoned and made to function like a
pedestrian mall. All parking would then be provided behind
the stores (east side).
The restored buildings could then
be used for actual retail services (groceries, drugs, gifts,
etc.).
-

45 -

�If the Ghost Town or Old Town theme does not evolve, retail
services will probably continue to develop on US-31 since
there would be little attraction to pull travelers off the
highway.
e.

Pellston Center
Pellston is the largest Village in the County and has the
largest concentration of permanent homes outside of the
Petoskey-Harbor Springs area.
The future plan for retail development is relatively uncomplicated emphasizing basic retail concepts.
These relate to
retail use concentrations, off-street parking, and a beautification plaza or mall to act as a focal point. Added to this
would be architectural improvements and pleasing center
appearance.

5.

Other Minimum Shopping Facilities
The previous paragraphs described various shopping areas in Emmet
County . In addition to these, there are other locations that may
develop commercially and these may include shopping center type
uses.
Based upon the distribution and compositi0n of competing retail
areas in the County, ten (10) other locations have possible longterm future retail center development.
The location of the ten potential retail centers are listed below,
roughly in the order of their development importance:
1.

Boyne Highlands - Nubs Nob Area

2.

Wilderness Park

3.

Larks Lake

4.

Bliss Center

5.

Resort Township (Intertown and Resort Roads)

6.

Good Hart

7.

West County Line on US-31

8.

Brutus

9.

Epsilon

10.

Stutsmanville

The actual priority and timing at which these centers may develop,
will be dependent upon the rate of future County growth and the
distribution of that growth among the sixteen Townships.
-

46 -

�TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL USES
The generalized Existing Land Use Map of Emmet County illustrates the
location of industrial uses. However, the term industry encompasses
many different types of land uses with industrial characteristics,
and is not restricted to manufacturing operations. In addition to the
manufacturing and fabrication operations, the industrial use classification includes enclosed storage, open storage, private gravel e x traction areas, junk yards and related uses.
It is important to
recognize the inclusion of uses that are by nature nonmanufacturing.
The typical urban community has about nine percent of its developed
land area in industrial type use . In Emmet County, all City and
Village communities average about five percent and the Ccunty 2.4
percent .
It is to be expected that the County and its constituent
communities would have a below average proportion because of the
County's regional location.
Nearly half of the County's developed industrial land is in the communities of Petoskey, Resort Township and Bear Creek Township. The
Penn-Dixie Cement Company in Resort Township is the largest industrial
use in the County and it supports the largest employment.
Several
smaller industrial plants have located in the urbanized area of
Petoskey, near the Harbor Springs Airport and in Pellston. For the
most part, manufacturing uses are limited in size and number . Moreover, their locational pattern reflects the attraction forces of
transportation media (airports, railroads, highways and harbors),
concentrated labor markets, housing areas and access to other urban
services such as water and sewer facilities.
EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION
In terms of employed labor force, TABLE 16 on the following page
indicates the breakdown by occupation within the County . These
figures are converted to percentages and compared with the State
of Michigan.
Some general observations can be drawn from the table.
Those occupations contingent to farming are somewhat higher than the state
average .
Craftsmen and operatives are lower than the State . This
was also found to be true in xhe City of Petoskey .
(See Petoskey
Industrial Study, March, 1969).
The Managers and
than that of the
tourist trade in
similar to State

Officials group and Service Workers groups are higher
State . This reflects in part on the motel and
the region. The remaining categories are relatively
averages.

As noted on the TABLE, the categories most oriented to manufacturing
industries (craftsmen, operatives, laborers) hav e a smaller percentage
of the employed labor force than the State average . This is partly
attributed to the dominance of retail employment to serve recreationtourist services, as well as the general lack of industrial activity
in all rural regi0ns of the State.
- 47 -

�TABLE 16
1960 0CCUPATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
Emmet County

Major Occupational Group

Emmet County
Number
Perc·ent

Michigan
Percent

Relation to
State

Professional, Technical
and Kindred

550

10.6%

11. 5%

Farms and Farm Managers

228

4.4%

2.2%

Higher

Managers, Officials and
Proprietors

632

12.2%

7.3%

Higher

Clerical and Kindred

581

11.2%

13.9%

Sales Workers

411

7.9%

7 . 4%

Same

Craftsmen, Foremen and
Kindred

666

12.9%

15.4%

Same

Operatives and Kindred

681

13.2%

22.2%

Much Lower

Pvt. Household Workers

254

4.9%

2 . 2%

Higher

Service Workers

635

12.3%

8.7%

Higher

78

1.5%

0 . 9%

Higher

Laborers

326

6.3%

4.0%

Higher

Not Reported

132

2. 6%

4 . 3%

5,174

100.0%

100 . 0%

Farm Laborers and Foremen

TOTAL EMPLOYED
SOURCE:

U.S. Census of Population, 1960

- 48 -

Same

Lower

�TABLE 17 shows the County's employed labor force by industry group,
ranked in terms of importance in a 12 County Region.
It is significant that Emmet County had the second highest employment base for
major service industries including retail trade. Manufacturing ranked
fourth and agriculture fifth.
Industrial Pl·an Elements
Based on the existing employment characteristics of the County and
general economic conditions related to manufacturing industry it can
be concluded that:
The area's economy is premised on a retail-service trade, based
primarily on tourist spending and will probably continue as such
in the future.
The labor force of Emmet County is oriented to service-retail
occupations and is lacking in the manufacturing skilled labor.
The region is removed from the major metropolitan centers of the
State and thereby removed from large labor markets, major triansport systems and market areas.
Labor diversity is a limiting factor in attracting industries that
are able to function in this economic area of the State.
Future industrial development may occur on isolated parcels until
some basic changes in transportation systems of the area are completed.
Future population growth will be affected by future industrial
development as well as increased tourist recreation services.
Emmet County is a major recreation service center in one of the most
impressive resort areas of the Midwest, which extends along the entire Lake Michigan shoreline.
The smaller and more northerly centers
that dot this shoreline rely to a heavy extent on tourist spending.
It- may be possible to see small scale machine shops, fabricating
plants, circuit production and similar industries come to Emmet
County at a gradual pace as in the past. The diversity and pace
of future industrial development will be affected by The following:
There may be a natural trend toward industrialization in the
smaller urban areas as an answer to problems of overcrowding
in major metropolitan areas.
Open lands suitable for industrial development near the Pellston
Airport may spur substantial economic growth in this central
region of the County.
This will generate both industrial and
domestic demands for community sewer and water services.

-

49 -

�TABLE 17
EMPLOYEES BY MAJOR INDUSTRY GROUP
Emmet County

'19'50
Agriculture

Rank in 12
· co·u nty_ Ar·ea_

844

7th

24

5th

3

Construction

1960

Rank in 12
COU!l,_!y Area

366

5th

10th

0

12th

420

1st

468

3rd

Manufacturing

924

2nd

681

4th

Utilities

337

2nd

336

3rd

1,195

2nd

1,447

2nd

Business &amp; Personal Services

795

1st

568

2nd

Other Services

579

1st

891

2nd

Public Administration

189

-2nd
-

183

- 2nd

5,387

2nd

5,174

2nd

16,534

2nd

15,904

2nd

Forestry &amp; Fishing
Mining

(J"1
G)

Wholesale and Retail Trade

Total Employed
Total Population
SOURCE:

U.S . Census of Population
Twelv e Counties in the Northern Region o f the Lower Peninsula.

�Other significant industrial growth areas may evolve at Mackinaw
City, and near the Harbor Springs Airport. Again sewer and water
demands will be generated.
The provision of new community water-sewer systems as well as the
expansion of existing systems.
Although not underway at this writing, a detailed Industrial Economic
Base Analysis and Plan will be prepared for Emmet County under the
11
701" Urban Planning Assistance Program. When completed, a more
precise analysis of industrial locations in the County will be available .
TRENDS IN RESIDENTIAL USES
Residential development in Emmet County assumes three basic forms.
First, is the urban density development in City-Village communities,
second, is the rural farm and rural nonfarm dwellings scattered among
the Township communities, and thirdly, the resort-vacation homes occupied on a seasonal basis, largely by families from distant metropolitan centers.
Each of these housing types exert basic pressures
for development and each type has a slightly different impact on the
lands and resources of Emmet County.
From the viewpoint of sewer and water utility services, the higher
density urban development in City-Village areas requires complete
water-sewer utilities. Competing for second priority needs are low
density housing areas close to City-Village areas and the higher
density seasonal home areas (as the one-hundred foot lots along lakes
and rivers). Rural farm and rural nonfarm homes exert lower priority
demands because of large individual building sites .
The need to promote concentrated residential development in Emmet
County is dramatized by the land to population ratio .
Emmet County's
total surface area (land and water) is 295,040 acres. Assumimg
all of this was available for use and equally divided among the County's
1970 population, there would only be some 16 acres of land per resident.
By addition in tourist demands and deducting land in forests
and nonresidential purposes, the available acreage would be much less .
In 1960, Emmet County's population was 15,904 persons occupying 4,696
households (3.33 persons per household).
Of this total, 48% of the
population lived in the urban communities of Petoskey and Harbor
Springs.
Seventy-three (73) percent of the population lived in the
County area encompassing the Townships of Bear Creek, Little Traverse,
Littlefield and Resort; and the Cities of Petoskey and Harbor Springs .
Hence, the remaining twenty-seven (27) percent of the population was
divided among the twelve remaining Townships.
This is an a v erage
350 persons per Township.

- 51 -

�Population projections for Emmet County show a possible 22,500 persons
by 1990. Of this total, some 18,510 persons are expected to live in
the six (6) urban oriented communities listed in the preceding paragraph (82% of the 1990 total).
The 1990 projection suggests an, increase of 2,060 permanent dwellings
over the 1960 total . Of these added units, only 370 are projected to
impact the Township's away from urban communities . This is an average
growth rate of about sixty permanent dwellings per year plus the repair and replacement of older depreciated units.
In 1960, Emmet County reported 2,560 seasonal housing units. This
represented some 32% of all housing in the County, both occupied and
1 The rural nonfarm areas had over forty-seven (47) perunoccupied ,
cent of their housing classified as seasonal . Comparable data on
seasonal dwelling constructed since 1860 is not readily available,
however, a substantial number of seasonal homes were constructed in
"Chalet Villages" near the ski resorts, on inland lakes, and on Lake
Michigan. Adding in trailers used for seasonal occupancy, it is
probable that more than half of the current rural nonfarm hou sing is
seasonal.
For residential planning purposes, it can be expected that urban resi_,dential demands will be greatest in and near Petoskey, moderate in
the Community areas of Harbor Springs, Alanson and Mackinaw City,
and slight in the outlying rural service communities .
The type of home most in demand is for three bedrooms and ov er (80%
to 90% of the market).
Only ten (10) percent of the market is for
efficiency, one bedroom and/or two bedroom units. 2 There is a strong
demand for three and four bedroom homes for families with incomes
under $6,000 per year.
Seasonal or recreation home demands will be strongest in those areas
that have multiple recreation use potential . Hence, a vacation home
that can offer ready access to skiing facilities, swimming beaches,
scenic views, forests, hunting and fishing will be in greatest demand,
Residential Planni~oncepts for Emmet County
Based on the analysis of County housing demands and population trends,
the following planning concepts should be used to guide future residential development in Emmet County:

1

2

According to the Emmet County Equalization Department, the proportion
of seasonal homes to permanent homes is still about one-third in 1969.
Mr. Ken Peterson, Realtor and Mr. Cy Jordan, from questionnaire
interviews assessing the real estate market in the five year
period prior to January, 1969 .

- 52 -

�1.

Recognize the fact that all land in the County will not and should
not be developed. That which is developed for residential use
should fit into logical service areas for schools, parks, shopping
and related.

2,

Scenic resources are integral elements of the County's economy .
These should be protected so that the character of the County
remains attractive and desirable for both permanent residents
and visitors.

3.

Wildlife is important to Emmet County as are forest and vegetative
resources.
Development patterns must recognize ecological factors
in the environment. Hence, swamp lands, wooded areas, streams
and related resources must be protected from pollution and depletion .
If present in the area, natural resource areas can extend into
urbanizing areas as open space wedges and recreation sites.

4.

Access to lakes and streams becomes more scarce each year .
View
existing undeveloped lake-river frontages as resources to be protected,
Encourage water oriented development to form in cluster
development patterns, rather than parcel off the frontage on a
100% individual access basis,
Cluster patterns can provide more
recreation home sites per foot of water frontage than the traditional subdividing method. Moreover, the scenic shore or river
bank will be protected.

5,

County roads normally provide access to farms and nonfarm homes
in rural areas, Traditional developments follow the existing
road patterns until the frontage is gone and large internal
vacant areas remain.
Preferably, small service roads and cluster
developments should extend from the County road rather than serve
individual unit frontage.
This will keep the roadway safer for
abutting developments and more efficient for traffic needs.

6.

Organize communities t~ promote and establish housing for low
income families and retirement age citizens. A review of housing
needs among Indian families should also be initiated .

The approach to the Residential Plan for Emmet County considers the
foregoing as concepts to guide the overall design of the Plan .
Residential Areas Plan
The "Residential Areas Plan" map illustrates several factors that
will influence the configurations of future housing areas in the
County,
These are:
Resource areas that should remain in a natural condition to
support broad scale resource management programs and ecological
balance.

-

53 -

�..."'
z

z

"'

I

....

~~iJ.,......--c==#==4==r==mr-=jt=·-;:n=

-

.,

::,
0

..

.,

..
.."' ..""

1'

"'

~
~

L

~ ~

&lt;&gt;

..
"'
3 .,..
"' ..
..
•. "' .~
I-

!

►

►

z

0
0

::,

Q

~

-

C

-

I
I
I
I

0

.••
•

..
J

--

z

1-

z

"'l-

..

o

-

.."'"
.."

'-&gt;

&lt;(
_J

a...

►

"''-&gt;

!::

CJ)

-

&lt;(

w
0:::
&lt;(

,,..

~r;·~-:--:-··· · t

_J

;:

&lt;(

:: ~ ~
::

(/) 0..

::.

11 4 0 :
,( ~ ~ ...J

}:_

:,'.,•

C

..

,, w

ii1 z

.

i!i:' !l

- -t----

"'

••

"'

~1 n
1,l

~'

t:

E

I

~
;

~
Q

-I-~

"'

"'&lt;t

ll.

~

o

i . --}r
_r

zz
w~

"',.

"

"'

~~==-,i'-=~""1n11

"'

",._

"'

o&lt;-&gt;

-

-❖:•:•:•:•.:

•

"'

,._

(/)~

,._

I

'~r.i==!'

W:E

z

a::~

0

...

~

...,

-~-;;

.o
.,_

.~Ii

~

,-

...,

............
r

•-

... -..,
r

.............

~
I

-1,,
t&gt;/

.::,
/

&gt;I/

3

)(

t,'

7

......
o -::,
o c

., 0

u

C
0

E
~ o
.c

c::·c

];
·;

Q.

�A highly tentative flignment for a future express type highway
through the County.
The basic County road - State Highway network which interconnects
the functional land use areas of the County . Some suggested
route changes have been included.
Key resort attractions and facilities wherein seasonal home construction is likely to continue.
Existing urban communities and concentrated housing areas.
The above factors were mapped and evaluated in terms of the pattern
of soil resources, topography, deer yard areas, quality fish streams
and existing land use.
These topics were discussed in previous report sections.
On the basis of the above, a generalized pattern of logical future
housing areas evolved.
In the communities of Petoskey, Bear Creek
Township and Resort Township, the Residential Plan is bas d on
neighborhood and residential plans for those communities. 2 These
Petoskey Area findings are considered to be a part of the Emmet
County Residential Plan, including any modifications and amendments
that may be made from time to time.
The methods used to delineate the urban residential areas near
Petoskey are the same as the methods used to determine urban residential areas in other County areas. Major highways, railroads,
public lands, steep topography, soils poorly suited to development
and related features were used as boundary references for residential areas.
On the 11 County Residential Plan 11 map, long-range urban neighborhood
areas were combined to form larger community areas. Each of the
community areas may be further divided into one or more neighborhood
units. The number of neighborhoods will ultimately be determined by
the density of population within each unit and the geographic size
of the community.

1

•

J

2

The mapped expressway is an interpretation of a general State Highway Department proposal. The route, however, is in an alignment
which appears to support basic planning conclusions for the County.
The final alignment may vary substantially from the tentativ e routing illustrated.
Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., Residential Areas, Petoskey Area
Planning Commission, January, 1969.
-

54 -

�ii

Following is a discussion of the general community areas mapped on
the irResidential Areas Plan":
1.

Petoskey Area
Area 1
Altogether there are nine residential areas in and near the City
of Petoskey and the Townships of Bear Creek and Resort. These
vary in size, some containing several planned neighborhood units.
The neighborhood units, however, are not delineated in expectation
that they will be fully developed within 20 years.
It may be appropriate to view the neighborhoods as basic "planning units" or
simply as residential areas.
Persons who build homes and purchase lots in the neighborhood
areas have the knowledge that they are in logical home areas.
On a long term basis, they can expect to be within a reasonable
distance from planned elementary schools, local recreation
areas, and community water-sewer-utility services.

2.

Harbor Springs Area
Areas 2, 3, 4 and 5
The Harbor Springs Area Residential Plan is presented in four
(4) basic areas. Area 2 can probably be divided into two neighborhood units, centered on a large resource area for open space recreation. Area 3 has the potential of being divided into four
neighborhoods. The exact number will depend on actual growth, the
ratio of seasonal homes to permanent residences, and the acreage
devoted to recreation-community uses. Area 4 encompasses most of
the existing developed lands in Harbor Springs. Area 5 is positioned along Little Traverse Bay and is predominantly a recreation
home area at this time. Development will be attracted to this area
by the scenic qualities of Little Traverse Bay.
Some negative
aspects relate to the flight path of the Harbor Springs Airport
and the rather narrow shape of the area.
Overall, Areas 2 thru 5 indicate the probable impact areas for
future high density residential development. As in the Petoskey
area, the capacity population of these areas exceeds the projected
growth.

3.

Round Lake Area
Areas 6, 7 and 9
The Round Lake Area of Emmet County is a sort of development crossroads where the urbanizing influence of Petoskey, Harbor Springs
and Alanson come together.
Round Lak~ also generates development
influences by virtue of water oriented recreation, home sites, the
Petoskey State Park, the Harbor Springs Airport, Conway and Highway interchanges.
- 55 -

�•

Planning and arranging land uses in the Round Lake area is complicated by the narrow highway corridors (US-31 and M-131) created
by Lake Michigan, Round Lake and Crooked Lake. Added to this is
a general mix of existing land uses, an incidence of poorly drained
soils, and absence of urban utility services.
The potential routing of a north-south freeway through this area,
will result in accelerated pressures and demands for land . Hence,
the Townships and communities involved must allocate land resources to housing, industry, tourist lodging and general commercial before it is too late to decide the best growth pattern.
Zoning will then be necessary to enforce decisions on the best
uses of land .
4.

Crooked Lake Area
Areas 8, 10 and 11
Crooked Lake is an established tourist housing area . The most
concentrated recreation home areas are found along the north shore
in and near Oden.
Pickerel Lake to the east is also developed with seasonal homes
and new units are being constructed along undeveloped shore area.
The entire Crooked-Pickerel Lake area is limited for development
by poorly drained soils.
The problem is particularly acute along
the shoreline where the demand for lake front home sites is
greatest. As a result, quantities of sewage effluent on the
surface of the ground and in the lake have reached a point of
serious pollution hazard.
This is an area which clearly demonstrates planning deficiencies in terms of :
(a)

carrying capacity of soils and land resources .

(b)

substandard and out-moded development standards .

(c)

inadequate traffic routes to serv e local and regional traffic ,

(d)

disregard for land use relationships (mix ed uses) ,

(e)

failure to implement central utility services prior to
intensive use of land.

The above points underscore some major problems affecting the
Oden-Crooked Lake area and it will likely result in expens iv e
community improvements to correct past mistakes ,

•

-

56 -

�5,

Alanson Area
Area 12
Alanson is an incorporated Village and is the County's third
largest retail service center , Retail services, the Crooked
River, and a new school will attract additional development
in and near Alanson. School enrollment increases since 1960
are factual evidence of continued growth.
The Valley of the Crooked River in Alanson is characterized with
soil and drainage conditions similar to areas near Crooked Lake.
Poor drainage and swamp conditions establish unstable building
conditions that will become more acute unless community sewer
and water systems are installed.

6.

Pellston Area
Areas 13 and 14
The community of Pellston is an incorporated Village located in
portions 6f two Townships.
This community is important because
it is adjacent to the Emmet County Airport, hence, a potential
source of added economic development for the County as well as
a major transportation terminal in the northern Lower Peninsula .
One manufacturing plant has located adjacent to the airport, and
others may be possible in the future .
A problem in accommodating residential growth is relating to
existing community service facilities, while avoiding the flight
~aths of major runways. There is also a land squeeze in Pellston,
because the existing Village is surrounded by public lands,
some poor soil areas, a major highway, and airport approach
zones.
It is difficult to cluster new housing because of the
factors listed above.

7.

Mackinaw City Area
Area 15
Mackinaw City supports a relatively low year-round population
because of the seasonal nature of the economy . Moreover, the
community is situated in two County's: Emmet and Cheboygan .
Most of the retail services, shopping and tourist lodging
facilities are in Cheboygan County, while many of the seasonal
and year-round dwellings are on the Emmet side.

l

The demand for residential land in Mackinaw City will be determined by successes in developing industrial land, especially_
those activities that require access to Great Lakes shipping lanes .
Also, the extent of tourist services will bear on added employment to sustain a larger year-round population . Potential industrial areas are located in Emmet County and these are linked
by rail to port areas and are readily accessible from the I-75
Freeway.
- 57 -

�"'

8•

Cross Village Area
Areas 16 and 17
Cross Village is located in a highly scenic area of Emmet County .
Developed on a high bluff, there are commanding panoramic views
over Lake Michigan, views which are especially dramatic during
sunset periods. Cross Village is also an historic Indian Mission
site.
Significant year-round employment opportunities in Cross Village
may be difficult to realize. Highway access is limited, there
are no railroads and existing community serv ices are oriented
to rural and tourist markets. Additional seasonal home development is the most likely economic impact that can add to the Community.
Cross Village has excellent Lake Michigan orientation
and it lies between the attraction forces of Wilderness State
Park and the ski resort areas to the south.
Since rleasure
boating on Lake Michigan is a highly attractive tourist activity,
harbor, beach and lake front park developments at Cross Village
could enhance community development potentials.

9.

Other Residential Areas
Even though the Residential Plan outlines a wide number of potential
residential areas that can be planned and serviced to house concentrated patterns of development, a large proportion of new homes
(seasonal and nonseasonal) will locate on tracts of land throughout
farm and nonfarm areas. Although this scattering development
should not be promoted as a planning principle, it can be less
of a problem with careful attention to ground water resources,
soils and overcrowding.
The problems of overcrowding and the mixed use character of developments on Crooked Lake and Paradise Lake must be avoided on the
other inland water resources of the County . If developers anticipate high density subdivision activity, then immediate concern
must be given for community water supplies and sewage treatment
services.

-

58 -

�WATER RESOURCES

(PART I A . 6.)

The general discussion of water resources is included in the report
section covering Natural Resources.
Specific information on the
quality of ground water supplies, well logs and community water
resources is contained in PART III of this Comprehensive Sewer and
Water Plan.
PART III contains the conclusions and recommendations
of the consulting engineers who participated in the preparation of
this report, McNamee, Porter and Seeley,

- 59 -

�LONG RANGE FINANCING PLAN

(PART II B

0

)

There are various bonding approaches and financial methods that local
units of government in the State of Michigan employ for the financing
of major water system and/or sewer disposal and collection facilities .
The following are the most commonly used in Michigan:
1.

Contract Bonds sold on the provisions of Act 185, P . A. of Michigan,
1957 as amended, commonly known as the Department of Public Works
Act.

2.

General Obligation Bonds sold under the prov isions of City and
Village Charters and Act 202, P.A. of Michigan, 1943 as amended,
commonly referred tQ as the Municipal Finance Act .

3o

Revenue Bonds sold pursuant to the provisions of Act 94, P.A . of
Michigan, 1933 as amended, commonly known as the Revenue Bond Act.

4.

Special Assessment Bonds sold under the provisions of Act 188,
P.A. of Michigan, 1954 as amended, and/or the Municipal Finance
Act.

PUBLIC ACT 185
Each of the above mentioned financial arrangements has certain advantages to the issuing municipality o The one that seems to combine
all the advantages and the one that is enjoying the greatest use, at
this time in Michigan, for the financing of major capi t al improvement
water and sewer programs, is the Department of Pubic Works Legislation,
Act 185 . Under this legislation, local units of government may enter
into a contract with the County Board of Commissioners .
The contract between the County and the contracting municipality,
provides, among other things, that the local unit has the right to
pay contractual commitments for debt service charges from many and
varied sources.
Contractual obligations incurred in behalf of the
local unit of government are exempt from any charter or statutory
tax or debt limitations. This is a key advantage from the standpoint
of the small community that finds itself facing the problem of financing several new public facilities at the same time . In many instances
where communities with a low tax base are confronted with the major
capital improvement programs, it is often advisable for that community to save its local bonding capacity for those projects that
cannot be financed through the County Department of Public Works.
Article 9 of the 1963 Michigan Constitution, provides that the local
unit would have an unlimited taxing power to meet the contractual
commitment to the County.

- 60 -

�The unit of government requiring water and / or sewer serv ice may contract with the Emmet County Board of Commissioners for the acquisition
and construction of said facilities. A contract would prov ide for
semi-annual principal and interest payments to be made by the local
unit of government to the County for the liquidation of County Bonds
sold to finance the improvement. Under the provisions of Act 185,
the local unit has numerous financial alternatives whereby it can
meet the contract payments to the County. Mainly these are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

ad valorem taxation
water and/or sewer user charges
connection charges
debt service charges
general fund allocations.

From the foregoing, it can be readily determined that the local unit
of government has many options available to it.
These options combine the advantages of both the general obligation bond issue and
the revenue bond issue as well as the special assessment financing
arrangements . Many communities in Michigan are financing water and
sewer programs through the Department of Public Works and liquidating
the contractual obligations by both connection charges and water/sewer
user charges.
Such an approach eliminates the need to tax residents
in the community that may not be served by the proposed facility
and places the utility on a self-sustaining user pay basis .
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
If the local units in Emmet County were to elect to finance water and
sewer projects within their own statutory limitations, the general
obligation bond, from the marketing standpoint, is the most attractive.
However, the provisions of the Municipal Finance Act (Act 202), limits
the amount of general obligation bonds that may be outstanding at any
one time, to ten percent of the local unit's latest state equalized
valuation . Local charters may provide for a lesser bonding capacity
than the ten percent as provided by state statute . General obligation
bonds must be submitted to a vote of the people. Even though a local
unit may offer general obligation bonds, and pledge the full faith and
credit of the municipality, they could, nonetheless, employ water and / or
sewer user charges as a means of liquidating the debt and possibly
eliminate the need for an ad valorem tax spread ,

- 61 -

�J
ACT 94.

REVENUE BONDS

Many communities in the State of Michigan, because they found themselves faced with the problem of bonding capacity, turned to the provisions of Act 94 and offered revenue bonds for the acquisition of
water and sewer facilities.
The revenue bond, under the provision of
Act 94, does not require a vote of the people but is authorized solely
and only by the adoption of the bond ordinance by the looal units of
governing body.
The marketing problems inherent to the issuance of
Act 94 bonds are somewhat more rigid and consequently, interest charges
are somewhat higher than normally experienced on general obligation
bonds or Act 185 bonds.
STATE AND FEDERAL AID
As a result of the favorable "Clean Waters Bond Issue" election held
State-wide in November of 1968, the State of Michigan has monies
available with which to fund a new grant program for water pollution
control facilities.
Under the provisions of enabling legislation,
cities, villages, townships and counties may receive up to 55% of the
total project cost in the form of State and Federal Aid.
Four Federal agencies presently have grant-in-aid programs available
to municipalities for the construction of water distribution systems
and sewage disposal facilities.
These agencies are:
1.
2.
3.
4.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Farmers Horne Administration (FHA)
Economic Development Administration (EDA)
Federal Water Pollution Control Adrninistration.(FWPCA)

Much news is being generated by the Congress, regarding inadequate
funding of the foregoing Federal programs in the past few years and
every effort is being made to remedy that situation4 At the present
time, Congress is considering substantial increases in the appropriations to once again fund the Federal programs for basic water and
sewer construction grants. The proper procedure for applying to these
agencies for financial assistance is to secure Form SF-101 of any of
the regional offices of the above mentioned Federal Agencies and
process them . Once the form has been prepared and signed by the
local unit, it should be returned to that agency, from which it came,
where it will be reviewed and assigned to the appropriate Federal
Agency having jurisdiction over the applying municipality .

- 62 -

�ACT 188 .

SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS

Public Act 188 of 1954 stipulates that a township with a State Equalized Valuation of at least $7,500,000 may issue special assessment
bonds on petition signed by not less than 51% o f the district requiring
improvements, pledging full faith and credit of the township.
Only
Bear Creek and Resort Townships now qualify in Emmet County.
Act 188 Bonds may be issued in an amount not to exceed 3 % of the assessed valuation per year without a vote of the electors and with a
maximum of outstanding bonds at any time of 12% of the assessed v aluat i on . With an affirmative of the electors, the maximum 12% may be
issued in one year. These bonds are retired by special assessments
against the benefiting property.
The assessments may be spread over
a maximum period of 30 years and if any assessments default, they
revert to the Township at large.
Therefore, in order to sell the
bonds, it is necessary to have a vote of the electors to prov ide for
the necessary millage should a default arise.
If the equalized valuation of the Township is less than $7,500,000,
then the Township must use Act 116 of 1923 which requires a petition
signed by 65% of the district requiring improvements and prov ides
that no annual installment of the assessment may exceed 15% of the
assessed valuation of the property.

- 63 -

�j
PLAN UPDATING PROPOSAL

(PART II C . )

It is recommended that consideration be given to the formation of a
County Department of Public Works or similar department (as outlined
in Part II B) for the purpose of keeping the Comprehensive Sewer and
Water Plan up-to-date. This department would:
1,

Be responsible to the County Board of Commissioners, yet relieve
the Board of working on time consuming details.

2.

Be in a position to determine project priorities which may change
in response to the demands of any given future date.

3.

Keep abreast of current methods of financing and federal assistance
programs. In rural areas, the Farmers Home Administration Programs
will be important.

4.

Work with the local and state health departments in order to establish programs for achieving and maintaining the increasingly more
stringent water quality standards as established by the Department
of Natural Resources,

5.

Insure the best utilization of existing and future resources within
the County for the planning and construction of public works projects.

6.

Provide overall technical leadership for sewer and water planning,
including assurances that facilities are competently operated and
maintained by a qualified staff.

7.

Be flexible to assist smaller units of government with system
development, especially in terms of extending financial abilities
through full faith and credit backing of County valuation .

As a particular project is planned, the services of a competent bonding attorney and bonding consultant should be obtained to assist in
the financial planning of the project.
The determination of sewer and water needs is directly related to land
use . Hence, the County Board of Commissioners should establish procedures whereby the Department of Public Works or any other responsible
committee, works in close coordination with the County Planning Commission.
If there is County-wide zoning, then the County Zoning Commission will be brought into the water and sewer planning process also .
Perhaps the single most important responsibility of the DPW, outside
of its financial objectives, is to determine project priorities . To
best perform this, the County must plan and execute individual projects
within the framework of the overall County Sewer and Water Plan. Township Boards, the County Board of Commissioners, priv ate land developers,
the Health Department, and various other planning groups will initiate
many of the project proposals.
-

64 -

�l
Because of the importance of the Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan,
efforts must be made from time to time to reappraise the Plan and update the proposals outlined therein.
The frequency with which the updating process occurs will depend on the pace of future land development, major new directives on pollution control, an~/or unforeseen
changes in the quality of existing water supplies. The Plan should
probably be given a thorough review every ten (10) years; sooner if
major new land developments impact the County.

-

65 -

�COMPREHENSIVE SEWER AND WATER PLAN:
PART III

�COMPREHENSIVE SEWER &amp; WATER PLAN
This section of the report encompasses PART III of the Comprehensive
Sewer and Water Plan, and describes the salient features of existing
systems and proposed improvements.
WASTE WATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT
Due to the importance of the water resources in Emmet County, it is
vital that they remain of the highest quality.
To insure this
quality, improved waste water treatment facilities are required .
As a result of the Federal Water Quality Act of 1964, a number of
communities in the County have already taken steps to provide new or
improve existing waste water treatment and collection facilities.
The Federal Water Quality Act required all states to establish upto-date water quality standards,
The Michigan Water Resources Commission has complied with this act and has obtained approval from
the Federal Water Quality Administration of the standards it has
established.

J

Early in 1969, communities in the State, including some in Emmet
County, received stipulations from the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources.
These stipulations stated that these communities would
provide secondary waste water treatment, if they were not already
doing so, and would provide facilities for the removal of a minimum
of 80 percent of the total phosphates from the waste water influent
to their treatment facilities.
The stipulations also provided for
consideration of a lesser degree of treatment than would be accomplished with a secondary process. However, the Water Resources
Commission had stated that if the treatment method employed did not
achieve a minimum 5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand removal, Federal
grant monies would not be available.
The Cities of Petoskey, Harbor
Springs and Mackinaw City have made every effort to comply with these
stipulations and each has plans and specifications for waste water
treatment improvements completed or being prepared. A large portion
of the present population will be served by these improv ements .
Following is a discussion of the existing waste water collection and
treatment facilities, existing problem areas, and proposed improvements within Emmet County.

-66 -

�Existing Facilities
At the present time, the Cities of Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Mackinaw
City have collection and treatment facilities.
The resort communities
of Harbor Point and Wequetonsing also have sewers and treatment facilities and the Bay View Association has sewers only, with treatment
being provided by the City of Petoskey.
Boyne Highlands provides waste
water treatment also.
It is estimated that approximately fifty-three
percent of the year-round residents of Emmet County are served by
these collection systems.
1.

Petoskey
The City of Petoskey is served by a separate sewer system; that is,
a sewer system for waste water and a storm sewer system for surface
water runoff.
The City's waste water is given primary treatment at
a plant located at the mouth of the Bear River.
It's location is
shown on the map, "Existing Sanitary Sewer Service." The plant
was originally constructed to use a chemical precipitation process .
However, as the degree of treatment was not appreciably increased
by the addition of chemicals, this process was abandoned and the
waste water had been given primary treatment only since November,
1969. The area presently served by the Petoskey treatment plant
is shown on the map "Existing Sanitary Sewer Service."
Harbor Springs
The City of Harbor Springs also has existing storm and sanitary
sewer systems. There is some ground water infiltration into the
sanitary sewer system and possibly some storm water connections.
Fine screening and disinfection of the waste water is prov ided
and it is then discharged into Little Traverse Bay without
further treatment. Discharge was originally at the shore line
but around 1960 the outfall sewer was extended out into the bay .
The Harbor Springs service area is shown on the "Existing Sanitary
Sewer Service 11 map.

,1

3•

Mackinaw City
Mackinaw City is served by separate sewer systems . The service
area for the sanitary system is shown on the existing service
area map, as ls the location of the City's existing treatment
plant. The existing plant is similar to an Imhoff Tank and provides the equivalent of primary treatment. Primary sedimentation
is accomplished in the upper part of the tank and solids digestion
in the lower sections.

-

67 -

�4o

Harbor Point
The community of Harbor Point provides its own waste water collection and treatment system. An Imhoff Tank followed by disinfection is the treatment process used.

So

Wequetonsing
Wequetonsing has a sanitary sewer system with treatment by means
of an Imhoff Tank.

6.

Bay View
Bay View also has a sanitary sewer system. The waste Water is
pumped to the Petoskey Plant for treatment.

7.

Boyne Highlands
Boyne Highlands provides for its own waste water treatment with
2 1/2 acres of lagoons.
Effluent from the lagoons is by infiltration into the ground through the bottom of the lagoons.

Existing Problem Areas
The existing treatment facilities discussed above, with the exception
of Boyne Highlands, are not adequate and will not meet present water
quality standards. Problems also exist in areas of the County not
served by the above sewer systems. As previously mentioned, the
areas around Crooked and Pickerel Lakes and along the Crooked River
have poorly drained soils and high ground water levels. These conditions will prevent the proper operation of septic tanks and drain
fields.
A sewer system and treatment plant to serve this area is
required . However, sewer systems of this type, around lakes, are
characteristically expensive. A greater length of sewer is required
to serve any given number of dwellings and ground water is normally
high around lakes requiring costly dewatering or trenches prior to
the installation of sewers.
A potential problem exists in Pellston. The majority of the lots
within the Village are small, 50 feet wide by 160 feet deep, particularly in the Business District where they are 25 feet wide by 150 feet
deep o These sizes do not provide sufficient area to operate both
private wells and septic tanks on the same lot without potential health
hazards.
J

•
- 68 -

�Planned Sewer Facility Improvements
A number of waste water treatment improvements in the County are being
planned at the present time. They are as follows:
Petoskey
The City of Petoskey recently awarded contracts for the construction
of a new 2 . 5 million gallons per day, design flow, waste water treatment plant which is to be located in Magnus Park in the City. The
existing treatment plan is to be abandoned and the waste water will
be pumped to the new treatment plant by means of a pumping station to
be constructed near the existing plant site. The new facility will
provide primary treatment, secondary treatment utilizing the activated
sludge process and tertiary treatment by microstraining. The treatment effluent from the new plant which will be of a very high quality,
will be discharged into Little Traverse Bay approximately 1,100 feet
from the shore line.
It is anticipated that phosphate removal will
be well ov er the 80 percent minimum requirement. The new treatment
plant, which was designed by McNamee, Porter and Seeley, Consulting
Engineers for the City, has a design capacity to serve nineteen
thousand people in the design year 2000. This design population
includes both permanent and seasonal residents in the City of Petoskey
and adjacent areas in Resort and Bear Creek Townships . The 1990 and
year 2000 service area boundaries and the location of the new treatment plant is shown on the Future Water and Sewer Service map . These
boundaries are based on anticipated future development and their
location may vary from that shown depending on where this development occurs" McNamee, Porter and Seeley have developed a General
Sewer Plan for the City of Petoskey in which provisions were made
for conducting the waste water from the townships to the new treatment plant. However, no sewers as yet have been designed in the
Townships . Plans are to continue to treat the waste water from the
Bay View Association at the Petoskey Treatment Plant.
Bear Creek Township has obtained the serv ices of Williams and Works,
Consulting Engineers, to study waste water collection and treatment
in the Township.
Harbor Springs and Little Traverse Township
The City of Harbor Springs and Little Traverse Township have joined
together in the formation of a waste water treatmen t authority . The
authority has recently received bids on a new treatment facility
which was designed for them by Williams and Works . Treatment will
be aerated lagoons followed by disinfection and spray irrigation.
The phosphates are utilized by the vegetation growth on the area on
which the lagoon effluent is sprayed . Therefore, no separate phosphate
remov al facilities are required . Spraying will be done during the
summer months with storage provided for the waste water during the
winter months. The location of the treatment facility, which is to
be constructed on a 320-acre site, is shown on the ''future Water and
Sewer Service Area" map.
- 69 -

�'

l
I

,' \ '

1'

,~.
~
,
'{
'

' '

{

J

J

J

J

1

,{

1
1
1~_, l~,- ~-' 1 1

1

l

~

l
- J

-1 _J 7

-1

C E C I l

-~·c

r

B A

A
s

r

T

.M

A

--~,,

----

u R G EON

••
•

••
~

r

B A

~

□
TI-·1'1G\
I i ~~·1-------- :

~

,~ "

'

'

~

C:Jl-6~
lo_~"C]\
il ~~ .
_i.

,£_.__j

v

.

G

•

~=~--

•
toOO!UillT

i

,

'
ii

I

~
,.

\, "

.--·

•

.

' .

'r .

1o

--ll

..

"

I

~

·

•

__:_

~-)1 ~~~L·

I

:

i ..

.o:;:, ;_ . .;

I

-T- -\----~ -------~~--\ .-

;
'

,

1

.

..

;·

I

\

;----1

TI·:

1

~'-

,

I

&gt;··: r:z1 ·

f i i

..

..,, 'h

1

~

••

i

T 37N

~. __ J

"

.

r •••

•

I

,~I1,
3

:

i!["".=
.....]_]Lr::]..IE]..' . ~\-~:::i:=
-- -jlJuyL.uuJ~~,
='=~~~.--- .- . - - - ~- JI---------] . □□'r i -+
p-

"

lJ
... ,~·o,,o·:·. ;-

.1

j

• jp ~
· S~ A
,-•;·---r---, I, l~i,. • . ,,.,
!i:, .• .-:=-"''~
L E A
I ~\ :
,.
· "~ r' ----7"
. J

I .~--\'=--+
. = ..

--1r-· .

_

..

1

I

Jnl.. I ,~1:1:
-

!S=====

·~k...

---·

~rc:7,--r- ""

1

-=""'~·_J"

-

~

s H •: 1

.....
.•

c:n·" . ,.

l i····~
, ---~:~;,-. ,,....J'i

,a

F

.

1

1

.

•

,,L---J--.- \.,--

I

I .

-------

I

100[=:T - -~': . . D

'

11

.:-~

~~B.±-~
,

.

E

j..

l

I

S"

LJ . : . E
\" . ·:. . I[ ., i .

I.,

~

---~ ,,--- ' l

. : . i···-

"
t

"B

.

~

i

· I I~-·

-~

--·1

~

N

•

..

u

u

..

..

HIDDEN

.

T

'

- - - -•• - - -

\ .

. . " - ., .°'I·-:.;~--I□\ .T--~1l~------p

1

~ ~ L' J L _ ,r7r---7
___JI

~·-

,, - - -T
•

11

R

A

v

d

a

E

'

_

5
+

~

---i\"

---,.

A.

•

~

,.

'\\

I ::

v

I

E

\\\\

,,

I

)"---

,,

1

I

~~~~~~\~,
::

I

~r[\·-.:/~-

trj?

\!-,

I

."

\: :';=====7rj --·-t--·--;
: ,:"~---.,:l i:
\~-- ~

1

I

;

,,

I\~

I

l. ~~--

I

II

::

t?

~~

!

T. 38 N.

i

CD!\\
-='

1 ='

'

,,
1:,__

V .l[ J
E W

_,{I

I

f]fl

,.,_J~l
:J

~ - !.

4J

&lt;

7DIT
'7

,_

&lt;l;

....,

L I TT L E

.

TR A VER S E

B A

-~
N
--D

r

,-~1·1r
IG:::'J\~ ~~
~JI" ; 7 ~
; .
I

L,

L. ..~ - -I

.

~ ..e--- --+ - •

-1 - ~

s

•

..

•

,

___: _

.,

l..___

"

l "

.

.
" I
-o-[

rG; . . .

, _.: : i'.·7□·:
_j

" ~ ·· ~
. . ttjl

' /

T'. ' . .. . .,--,
i :I .

. .
- ~'v.---

.i

....
. ..

.

~~.. .. ~_ Olr"JI
,·,"

\\ .0v;•f

n

H

'--·

1

,... .

_j

COUNTY
R. !!W.

R . 6W

R ••

LEGE N D
~
1'H[

o,

..

PIOl[PA ■ A1'10H

•

TIii$ ,.. ,.,. 1"011 l1'1[ [MW[T

C0UNll fL.OOtlNG C0lilMtSSI0H WI.$ r1N• ... cto . , ..
GII.UtT
l1'4[ fAlt !ij [lt's HOii[ &amp;OMINlSTR.t.TION '
UN11'(0 SlAT[S DEPIIIIHHlrlT
.t.GIIICULfUR[ •ll70 ·11

,~o•

l(&amp; L [

or

~

PROBABLE fU T URE SERV I CE AREAS
PROPOSED fUTURE WELLS
TENTATIVE FUTURE SERVICE AREAS
·IASED ON PROJECTED LAND USE .
( ENGINEERING FEASIIILITY NECESSARY
TO DETERMINE SPECIFIC SERVICE AREA
80UNDARIESJ

Ill

f l:l t

vilicon · lemon a assoc. inc.
planninQ
con1ullants
MCNAMEE PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CONSULTING
ENG INEERS

I

FUTURE COMMUNITY WATER SERVICE
EMMET

T 3 ~N

COUNTY

T S4N

�Harbor Point and Wequetonsing have contracted with the City of Harbor
Springs for waste water treatment. Waste water from the Conway area
will a l so be treated at the authority's facility . The area to be
served by the authority is shown on the map "Future Water and Sewer
Serv ic e Area''. The treatment facility is designed to serve a population of 2,500 in the winter and 4,500 in the summer to the 1990
des i gn year o
Prior t o the design of both the Petoskey and Harbor Springs - Little
Trav er se Township Projects, McNamee, Porter and Seeley, acting f8r
t he City of Petoskey, and Williams and Works, acting for the Authority,
worked jointly on a study of the feasibility of incorporating the two
proposed t reatment facilities into one larger facility which would
serv e t he entire area. A number of possibilities were studies, but
due to the distance between Harbor Springs and Petoskey and the
relatively little development between the two Cities, it was found
to be more economical to proceed independently as planned.
Alanson and Littlefield Township
Due to the problems previously discussed around Crooked Lake and along
the Cr ooked River, the Village of Alanson and Littlefield Township
hav e jointly obtained the services of Williams and Works for the
purpose of making a study for waste water collection and treatment.
Wor k on this study was begun just recently and no recommendations
have been presented to date.
Some of the possibilities being considered by the engineers are:

.,
J

J

l o

Alanson and Littlefield Township joining the Harbor Springs Littl e Trav erse Authority with the waste water from this area
being treated at the Authority's proposed facility.

2o

Alan s on and Littlefield Township contracting with the Authority
for waste water treatment at the Authority's facility.

3o

Al anson and Littlefield Township either joining or contracting
with the Authority and the Authority treating the waste water
fr om this area at a second treatment facility to be cons t r u cted in Littlefield Township.

4o

Alanson and Littlefield Township remaining independent from the
Harbor Springs - Little Traverse Authority and constructing
the i r own waste water treatment facility .

Regar dless of the results of the engineer's study as to the most
feasib l e and economical method, it is encouraging that the Village
of Al ans on and Littlefield Township recognize the present problems
and are taking steps to eliminate them .

-

70 -

�Mackinaw City
The firm of Johnson and Anderson, Consulting Engineers for Mackinaw
City, are preparing plans and specifications for a new waste water
treatment facility which is to be constructed in the near future.
Current plans are to abandon the existing treatment_ plant and pump
the waste wat er to a new treatment facility to be located on a 60
a cre s ite southwest of the City . Treatment will be by lagoons
with d isinfection and spray irrigation.
Storage will be provided
for the waste water for 6 months during the winter . The facility
will serv e the area within Mackinaw City only . The design is based
on serving a population of 6,000 people in the year 1985 .

J
J

The proposed facilities for Petoskey, Harbor Springs - Little Traverse
Township and Mackinaw City will have a design capacity to serve a
t otal of 29,500 people, which is nearly 50% greater than the 1990 projected year-round population of Emmet County .
Should Alanson and
Littlefield Township provide waste water collection and treatment,
the abov e total capacity of treatment facilities will be even greater.
A very high percentage of the present population will be provided with
waste wat er collection services and the areas most likely to experi ence t he majority of the future population growth will already
hav e been provided with this utility.
Although the Village of Pellston is not planning sewer improvements
at the present time, it is recommended that they be considered in
the near future, should financial assistance be available. It is
dou b tful t hat the Village could fund such a project without assistance . 1
There a r e many programs available, both Federal and State, which would
pay a substantial portion of the project cost.
Even with assistance
it is often d ifficult, if not impossible, for small communities to
finance ~he remaining portion .

J

Was t e wat er treatment facilities are becoming increasingly more expens iv e as more stringent treatment requirements are adopted by the
gov ernmental agencies. For example, treatment by lagooning has been
a common ly used method for small communities, as construction cost
was relatively low and very little maintenance or operations was requir ed . But then it became a requirement that lagoons could discharge
into t he r eceivi ng body of water but twice each year, once in the
spring and once in the fall . Thus, it was necessary to design lago0ns
larger t o pr ovi de for six months storage. It then became a

1

]

-

A l a r ge pr ivat e recreati on and housing development (approximately
200 unit s ) is being planned in an area south of Pellston .
If the
dev e lopment materializes, it would be desirable to consider the
feasibility of a joint community sewage treatment serv ice.

- 71 -

�-

requirement that all effluent from lagoons would be chlorinated for
disinfection and this increased the initial cost and required more
attention to operation.
It is now a requirement that 80
percent of the total phosphates in the incoming waste water be removed by the treatment.
The lagoon type treatment process is not
adaptable to phosphate removal so that the method most commonly used
is to follow the lagoon treatment with spray irrigationo A large
amount of additional land is required, an extensive network of spray
piping increases the maintenance required, and additional fencing,
tree planting and other requirements of the Health Department make
this type of treatment much more expensive than in the past.
It would be desirable to have all the dwellings in the County provided with waste water collection and treatment.
But it is not
economically feasible even with substantial financial aid.
It is
recommended that the remainder of the County continue with private
septic tanks and drain fields at the present. As further development occurs or as potential problems arise, additional sewer systems
should be studied.
Some rural areas that may require sewage services
because of increasing development and therefore increasing volumes
of sewage effluent include: Walloon Lake, Paradise Lake, Larks Lake,
Mackinaw Shores, Cross Village and the Ski Resort areas in Pleasantview Township . Demands in the rural Townships of West Traverse, Friendship, Readmond, Cross Village, Bliss and Wawatam would probably arise
in areas along the Lake Michigan shore. The other Townships may
remain more rural, and services may never be feasible except in a
few instances where concentrated development may occur or increase.
Levering, Carp Lake, Brutus and Van may be affected under these
conditions .
Springv ale Township could have some potential utility
service area near Crooked Lake and Pickerel Lake.

COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS
Safe and abundant drinking water is a most fundamental requirement
to our existence. There are two sources available for obtaining
this water. These are surface water sources such as lakes and river,
and ground water sources such as artesian and drilled wells. Although
there is an abundance of high quality surface water sources in Emmet
County all domestic water is obtained from wells. Petoskey, Harbor
Springs, Mackinaw City, Hidden Hamlet and Boyne Highlands all have
existing distribution systems. Pellston does not have a public water
system but does have wells and a cistern for fire protection. Alanson
has cisterns for fire protection also. The following is a discussion
of water s u pply and distribution in the County.

J

-,
.J

-

72 -

�Petoskey Water System
The present area served by the City of Petoskey water system is shown
on the "Existing C0mrnunity Water Service" map.
The water is supplied
by an infiltration well, 17 feet deep, and a pumping station located
on the shore of Little Traverse Bay within the City. The water is
chlorinated and fluoridated prior to entering the distribution system.
Storage is provided by one new 300,000 gallon steel elevated storage
tank, two 150,000 gallon concrete ground storage reservoirs and one
110,000 gallon steel standpipe, 40 feet tall.
The new 300,000 gallon
elevated tank is supplied by three high level pumps at the pumping
station on the lake shore .
These three pumps each have a capacity
of 600 gallons per minute at 500 feet total head. Also at the pumping station are located three 600 gallons per minute low level pumps
which serve the main part of the City and also supply the two 150,000
gallon ground storage reservoirs.
The water is pumped again from the
ground storage reservoirs to maintain the level in the standpipe
which supplies a second high level district , The location of the
pumping station and storage facilities are also shown on the "Existing
Community Water Service" map .

J

J
.,

It is believed that the infiltration well is recharged from ground
water flowing from the south, rather than from Little Traverse Bay,
as the level in this well is normally above that in the Bay.
This
is somewhat substantiated by the complete chemical analysis of the
City's water which is presented in TABLE 18. A surface water supply
would not be expected to have a total hardness as high as 170 parts
per million.
The Petoskey water supply is of a good quality as can
be seen from a comparison of TABLE 18 with the Water Quality Goals and
Drinking Water Standards listed in TABLE 19. The Water Quality Goals
were established in 1967 by the American Water Works Association
(A.W.W . A. ) as an outline of the characteristics of a treated water
of a high quality.
The Drinking Water Standards were established by
the United States Public Health Service (U.S.P.H.S.) in 1962 and are
endorsed by the A.W.W.A. as minimum standards for all public water
supplies , The water is fairly hard but not so much as to warrant
a softening plant at the present time .

J
.,
]

J
,,,,
:-,

J

- 73 -

�~

I

j

TABLE 18
PETOSKEY, MICHIGAN
COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
(parts per million)
Determination

Resu l t

Determination

Color units
Odor
Turbidity units
Total solids
Silica-SIO 2
Manganese-Mn
Iron as Fe
Magnesium-MG
Sodium-Na
Calcium-Ca

0
None

Potassium-K
Nitrate-NO 3
Chloride-CI
Sulphate-SO 4
Bicarbonate-HCO3
Carbonate-CO 3
Fluoride-F
Hardness-CaCO3
Hydrogen ion-pH
Conductance-Micromhos

0
216
4
0
0.1
11
8.1

so

Result
1. 2
1. 2
16

29
170
0
0.30
170
7.4
375

TABLE 19
A oWoWoAo WATER QUALITY GOALS
U. S . P.H oSo DRINKING WATER STANDARDS
(parts per million)

j

,

..,

]

Determination
Color units
Odor
Turbid i ty units
Total solids
Iron as Fe
Manganese-Mn
Nitrate-NO3
Chloride-CI
Sulphate SO 4
Hardness
Flu oride

A . W. W. A. WATER
Quality Goals

15

3

None
0.1
200
0 . 05

OoOl
45
250
250
80
0 6-1. 2
0

]

]

U.S . P.HoS, Drinking
Water Standards

- 74 -

3
5

500
0. 3
0. 0 5
45

250
250

�1

Harbor Spr in~s
The Harb or Springs water system is supplied by four wells and one
335,000 gallon ground storage reservoir. The wells are:

II

j

Name

Depth

Capacity

Stadium Well
Bu l l Moose Well
Peffer Well
State Well

160
90
180
160

750
430
330
330

feet
feet
feet
feet

gpm
gpm
gpm
gpm

In a 1 966 revision of the City's Master Plan by Williams and Works,
it was recommended that three additional wells be installed in the
future o The locations of the existing and proposed future wells
and the ground storage reservoir are shown on the "Existing Community Water Ser•v ice" map o The area served by the system is also
shown on t he "Existing Community Water Service" map.

1
1

A complete chemical analysis of the
shown in TABLE 20 0 The water is of
is quite hard t here is no manganese
not chlorinated at the present time

Harbor Springs water supply is
a good quality and although it
or iron present. The water is
but fluoride is added.

TABLE 20
HARBOR SPRINGS, MICHIGAN
COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
(parts per million)
Determination
Color u nits
Odor
Turbidity units
Total solids
Silica-SIO 3
Iron as Fe
Manganese-Mn
Calcium-Ca
Magne s ium-Mg
Sodium-Na

Result
0
None
0
210
8

o. o

0 0
48
16
0

L4

Determination

Result

Potassium-K
Nitrate-NO
Chloride-Ci
Sulphate-SO4
Bicarbonate-HCO3
Carbonate-CO3
Hardness-CaCO3
Fluoride-F
Hydrogen ion-pH
Conductance Micromhos

0. 5
12
0
7
210
0
185
0.30
7. 3
370

J

J
-

75 -

�Mack i naw City
One 8- i nch well approximately 200 feet deep and one 10-inch well 296
feet deep supply water to the Mackinaw City system .
It is estimated
by the City that these wells hav e ov er double the capacity of that
being utilized at the present time.
Storage is provided by one 100,000
gallon elev ated storage tank . The existing service area, wells and
storage tank are shown on the "Existing Community Water Service" map.

j

There hav e been problems in the past with an odor from the water caused
by hydro gen sulfide, but this has been successfully eliminated by
c hlori natio n o The water is not fluoridated .

TABLE 21
MACKINAW CITY, MICHIGAN
COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
(parts per million)
Determi nation
Color units
Odor
Turbidity units
Total solids
Silica-S I O4
Iron as Fe
Manganese-Mn
Calcium-Ca
Magnesium-Mg
Sodium-Na

Results
5
None
2. 0
290
10
0. 2
0. 0
68
17
4

Determination
Potassium-K
Nitrate-NO3
Chloride-CI
Sulphate-SO4
Bicarbonate-HCO 3
Carbonate-co
Hardness-CaC 3
Fluoride-F
Hydrogen ion-pH
Conductance Micromhos

8

Results
0. 5

o. oo
4
19
220
0
240
0. 3
7.9
460

The complete chemical anal ysis of one of the wells, given in TABLE
21, shows the water to be very hard.
When this analysis is compared
to TABLE 19, with respect to total solids and iron, the water will
not meet A .W.W. A. Water Quality Goals, but it is well within the
U. S . P . H.S. Drinking Water Standards.
Boyne High l ands
Boyne High l ands operates its own private water system which is supplied
by one 6-inch wel l and one 8- inch well, each of approximately 250 gallons per minute capacity, and one 10-inch well that i s 650 gallons per
minut e c apacity .
Storage is provided b y a 2,000 gallon reservoir . The
water i s r eport ed t o be of a v ery go0d quality .

J
- 76 -

�,r

Hidden Hamlet

i

...-------

1

...-------

...-------

--

There is an existing water system in Hidden Hamlet, a development of
recreational homes located directly north of the Nubs Nob ski area .
The system is privately owned and operated by the Hidden Hamlet property owners. The system has no fire hydrants and fire protection is
provided by the City of Harbor Springs.
The system is supplied by
four 4-inch wells and one 6-inch well.
Present pumping capacity is
420 gallons per minute and the total capacity of the existing wells
is estimated to be over 700 gallons per minute, A 4,000 gallon ground
storage reservoir provides storage for the system .
L'Arbre Croche
This new development on Little Traverse Bay between Petoskey and
Harbor Springs is constructing a private water system which is to
be supplied by two 350 feet deep wells.
The new system will be
hydro-pneumatic.
Pellston
Although the Village of Pellston does not have a public water supply,
the Village does have three wells for fire protection . Two of these
wells are approximately 40 feet deep and the third is approximately
125 feet deep. The Village also has a 20,000 gallon cistern which
is used for fire protection .
Remainder of Emmet County
Wequetonsing and Harbor Point have water systems supplied by the City
of Harbor Springs.
Bay View also has a water system and is included
in the Petoskey service area,
The remaining area of the County is
served by private wells.
Logs of the wells drilled in Emmet
from the District Health Officer .
well logs . All Townships in Emmet
TABLE with the exception of Center
in 1970 0

County during 1970 were obtained
TABLE 22 is a tabulation of these
County are represented in the
Township which had no new wells

J

J
J
- 77 -

�-

7
TABLE 22
WELLS DRILLED IN EMMET COUNTY IN 1970

Township

....-

Bear Creek
Bliss
Carp Lake
Cross Village
Friendship
Littlefield
Little Trav erse
Maple Ri v er
McKinley
Pleasantvi ew
Readmond
Reso rt
Springv ale
Wawatam
West Traverse

Na o of
Wells
7
1
2
4
2
45
2
3
1
2
4
3
2
1

Least
Depth(ft o)

Greatest
Depth(ft .)

29

145

62
57
135
51
51
170
43

169
190
185
13 8
233
206
62

66
140
69
121

9 41 80
148
1 85
Av erage Depth

....-

..J

J
J

-

Total Wells

Average
Depth(ft.)
93
210
116
120
160
91
169
188
53
370
80
164
109
153
225
153

43

Thirty-nine of the wells list ed in TABLE 22 were constructed with 4-inch casings and the remaining four were constructed with 2-inch casings.
The varying topography within the County is illustrated by the
large range in depths of t he wells . Twenty-four of the new wells were
constructed in the six southerly Townships in the Cou nty o The logs
for these twenty-four wells indicate a clay layer of v arying thickness
and dep t h throughout most of this area . This is a desirable condition
as the clay layer acts to seal of and protect the aquifer from possib l e contamination from th e surface. The majority of these wells
draw water from a sand or grav el aquifer while a few of the deeper
wells were in shale .
Fourteen of the wells listed i n TABLE 22 were construct ed in the central
seven Townships of the Count y .
Clay and clay mixtures of sand and
grave l wer e found throughout most of the depth of these wells with
the wat er bearing strata be ing sand or gr a v el.
No rock was en countered
in any of the fourteen wells o
The remaining fi v e wells we r e constructed in the three most northerly
Townships in Emmet County . Two of the fiv e were drilled to water
bearing limestone and the other three to sand or grav el o Clay materials
were reported throughou t most of the depth o~ four of th e five wells.

- 78 -

�A.l though the wells listed in TABLE 22 cover but a small portion of the
wells within the County, they do indicate that potable water is readily
available from ground water sources in Emmet County.
Lake Michigan and
Little Traverse Bay are also available as a source for public water
supply but, to date, have not been utilized. This is not unusual as
the costs of inlet structures and long intake lines in the lake are
usually prohibitive to small communities.
It is not unlikely that as
the City of Petoskey's population grows and as Resort and Bear Creek
Townships develop that Little Traverse Bay may be utilized as a rater
source for this area in the future.
FUTURE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
It is recommended that the existing water distribution systems in
Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Mackinaw City be extended as required
in the future to serve the areas approximating those to be served
by their waste water treatment facilities.
However, certain problems
will be encountered in expanding the present sys~ems.
Due to the
varying terrain of the County, booster pumping stations and reservoirs
will be required to maintain adequate pressures in the areas at the
higher elevations.
Due to the previously mentioned potential problems within the Village
of Pellston, caused by the small lot sizes, it is recommended that
consideration be given to a public water supply for the Village. As
safe drinking water is a necessity, it is recommended that a water
system be given priority over waste water collection and treatment
facilities . Construction of a water system also has the advantage
of increased fire protection.
It is recommended that a public water
system also be considered in Alanson. However, a waste water
collection system should have top priority at the present time.
As there is an abundance of potable ground water available, the
remainder of the County should remain with private wells. As these
rural areas develop, a water system, as with a sewer system, should
be considered a necessary part of that development.

J

If community sewage services are not feasible in the more rural County
areas, then water services may have to be provided when significant
increases in development occur . The need may be prompted at an earlier
time if the capacity of the soils to absorb septic tank effluent is
exceeded o Areas that may require central wa~er systems first, will
likely be in resort locations, particularly water oriented sites .
These may include: Walloon Lake, Paradise Lake, Crooked Lake, Larks
Lake, Mackinaw Shores, Cross Village and the Townships which have
frontage on Lake Michigan. At least some limited need could be experienced in any one of the rural Townships of Bliss, Carp Lake,
Center, Cross Village, Friendship, Readmond, Springvale~ McKinley,
Maple River, Pleasant View and Wawatam.
The communities of Alanson,
Pellston, Carp Lake, Levering, Brutus, Van, Oden, Conway, Bay Shore
and other locations may develop needs at an earlier time.

- 79 -

�.,

{

t~ ( i 1

r-= C

t i

.J

,--: { •

~·

-~·

'

j

,·

·1990 SERVICE
C £C I

- ~ ..W
~~

L

AREA

r

B A

~

PRO'l\OSED TREATMENT PLANT
T.ltN,

:JI ~

A

B A

T

1'

~f

If

A

·------r;::::=

",,,,,,
,,,.
l\

sTUl?GEON

r

-.'~:,.

-h.J "'

---...&lt;
I ---j,r•

II

II

.

LJL□
□
~----□·[]
~ "~~---~
~

~

e.J•J

~
('.)

'

H

ti

•

I

I

11

C ••

T. 51N.

l--"~ ,_,

'

,,,,,,,

:

'
't

!

(.,

c
r•
t
_llJ
:
'
I
I~
•[L•JiJc.~• !c • □
·\

'
~

✓[
dz::r71 .·s=JpP□----~- - · ~

\

J

A

D

M

:

N

I

D

I

•

:- l .

\~

·

~ -- ~ \

C

.

1·

"

. ·

i

.

I

.

"

.

I

"

'

I. .-.
I

, . I;

N ::t D

E

S

' ,1

"_J

H "I: - ~

p --

[

11

'

&gt;

•

,'I

•

TI

I

'
:K

MC

~ J~~
' 1

i

.,.

,

•

i

;I"--===-'"-"'~--•

•

I

c"

1J .
.., •

-

(

,.-·

! ··

~
...

c __ ____ Jlr==7"b~
.., t !

IL==='---=:!~:

•

·Jv . lLJ
]□
7d'□"
•

"

•

IOI ~- . I

-

+

•

=-·

/'~

'

"

I

,= \ - ~

w'

E

,·,,

i

•

u □.□[I

l=rl -l ' -~-~·------~--T·-----i
t--- . ,-· lJ. . . ..i 7
,
_:DO! ' .
· t ·

--~-J

•

~, -t
•

:

j "

•

"

l

1

»

~I

"

~-hi

-

---··

n. - ------_....
'

•

-

___,, --~---F-----" ' ~~·,, \I

L

•

[L ___:

S

.

\\ - --=:==;,:-

➔

\

1E

: ,:, •
I

,,~

t

11

;::.,,.,,.

,~,

~:..---.,-,

I

1I

t--- ----t-I --··l,;,a

11\

I . ~

T. MN

I

ii

V

E

_j, .

::i---

I, T

•

!;-

.
.
·
1 \
. 1:,i

,.

.---,

'

f==-,
~~·-·-==1~=~=11•
::--~~~~:

.

-,,--- _______ _J\

~

T. 37N,

1

y

E

L

N

'

ILJ.

;

I

"

-iii----'-- _

i1·

..

~

~-

~ - - ,~

.
,:
-=~
~
I ~
"
"-L"
~ :i

'I

\

I

I

+

.

-C

cl=-•1•.•"]o••--,~,t t_ __' ,]
'

__ _J

"L--JI

-

----,--

..: . " l .

:

-~]
--r

-

O

1,

I• - --;=='='•~!'==--~~---: __ _]~
I

.

'·

E

.□
u□
•
---- D

¥u,A11'

. Ir&lt;

~.-.I-!

'. \!• • " ·)c• Jr7-fl - -'-'----\ ---,,---4
• • LlJ .
' -·- i
1\
~

'

'

~-~~

I

"

1

~•

.

1

'

F

\

D
.
r~
-•··•·.... ~•· r -l~ -;
~~
u.. . ·
· :· ·'
JQ;\1.
rh· -· ··r:;

.
.lf-b.'----'

Ml.OIL(

I

:r,1
11

\L-1'i1

~ --~-- -·-----

,, ..~,

Ill

,111. - -

, "

:11 .

. l,.t,J;;;:,;-1t

..I.

B~(
~ I!: ~

--1._ _ _

!

: "''"..

~ c___,,,,.,._J

l..,

i

T 3!5N.

,-----.;(

""
~

LITTLE

-.J

Tl?AVE l? SE

8

A

r

~ J::j\:,,, ~((n•·
r==~
. . t[j~----:
- -i

o•:•:[
~ ;aa!
-r~fi
II~

.

REA

~-- t~l~J_··_

~Fl t,-1
....~

E

!t.. ,.

-

K

_

_J1

·-

·

I

~ a\

---7

:

1,1:,,:f"

17\\ :,'(

I

"

U·Gu:J·,
-~

!!""'

~I_..../,

'

..

'

.

G

PROPOSEO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

PROPOSED WAJOR SANITARY SEWERS

t ·:·':':·:·:·::';:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·::j PROPOSED 1990 SERVICE AREAS
PROPOSEO 2000 SERVICE AREAS

..

1•11s ... , ,011 ,Ht [ Mlit tT

Wlla

COUNT¥ f'LollOIINO C0011 1lllS10N WA$ flN AN ttO · • I.
.IIANT flt0 1t TH[ fA ll .. (ll 'S NO•t A0Ml,.IITIUTl0N ,

u,ollO

nuts

01:,.,11, ... c111 c, ..,ucu1.1u1tt • l9l'O · fl

S CALI

UI

TE NTATIVE F UTURE SERVICE AREAS
- BA SED ON PROJEC TED LAND US E.
( ENGINEERING FE A SIBILI TY N ECESSARY
TO OET ERMINE SPECIFIC SERVICE AR EA
BOUNDARIES.)

fl('T

vilicon · leman a assoc. inc.
planninQ
consultants
MCNAMEE PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CON SULTING
ENGINEERS

I

FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
EMMET

COUNTY

A

\~

- - - - - PROPOSED MAJOR P UMPING MAINS

o,

V

L

_1E

~

____:

"

~
~~ -

LEGEND

o,t .-11t ....11 .. 1,011

-~~'

COUNTY
R 4W

-----

~
"

,·••' ',,,? •

T. 34N.

SW

■

..

�,......

-I

A P P E ND I X

.....-

,
j

�LJ

l_j

L:::J

~

~

l_J

l_J

I__J

Ld

\_J

l-1

I__J

\_J

\_J

l__J

l_J

L-1

APPENDIX TABLE 1
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 1
Emmet County
Bliss

Carp
Lake

Cross
Village

Readmond

TOTAL

--

Mackinaw
City(Pt)

DISTRICT
TOTAL

Residential

57

95

26

48

226

32

258

Seasonal Homes

14

90

30

30

164

30

194

Public Uses

85

9

2

2

98

39

137

2

97

4

4

107

17

124

Recreation

6,960

53

5

12

7,030

15

Commercial

1

32

2

8

43

20

Industrial

3

12

-

-

15

41

Railroads

-

8

-

-

8

14

422

392

197

458

1,469

--

145

1,614
17%

7,544

788

266

562

9,160ac .

353

9,513ac.
100%

3%
2%
1%
Quasi-Public

►
I
I-'

1%
7,045
74%
63
1%
56
1%
22
•

Roads
TOTALS

SOURCE:

Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc .

9.:0

Land Use Inventory, Summer, 1968,

\_J

I

�~

~

L..:J

L....:::-J

l__J

l_J

l_J

L..d

l_J

l_J

l_l

LJ

LI

L.J

'-'

LI

APPENDIX TABLE 2
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 2
Emmet County

Center

I

I'-)

Maple River

TOTAL

Pellston

DISTRICT
TOTAL

Residential

55

79

76

210

82

292

Seasonal Homes

32

4

6

42

-

42

Public Uses

63

1,450

9

1,522

16

3

6

7

16

2

Recreation

11

2

1

14

6

Commercial

1

12

28

41

5

Industrial

12

6

30

48

7

-

65

63

128

14

99

351

465

915

16

Quasi-Public

::i&gt;

McKinle_z

Railroads
Roads

TOTAL

SOURCE:

276

-1,975

685

Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc .

-2,936ac.

148

9%
1%
1,538
50%
18
1%
20
1%
46
1%
55
2%
142
5%
931
30%
3,084ac.
100%

Land Use Inventory, Summer, 1968

~

L-1

1

1

�I
APPENDIX TABLE 3
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 3
I:mmet County

Friendshi,E_

Little
Traverse

Pleasantview

West
Traverse

Residential

46

145

12

55

258

173

431

Seasonal Homes

60

105

28

68

261

NIA

261

Public Uses

6

131

27

31

195

16

211

Quasi-Public

9

155

1,984

97

2,245

18

Recreation

1

3

-

-

4

47

29

1

32

62

32

TOTAL

Harbor
SErings

DISTRICT
TOTAL
9%
6%

::i:,.
I

w

.)

5%
2,263
47%
51
1%
94
2%
207
4%

Commercial

(

Industrial

10

180

2

15

207

-

447

343

80

246

1,116

144

1,260
26%

579

1,091

2,134

544

4,348ac .

430

4,778ac.
100%

Railroads
Roads
TOTAL

SOURCE:
Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc.
NIA - Not available

Land Use Inventory, Summer, 1968

~

1

�!___JI

l._JJ

I_

APPENDIX TABLE 4
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.4
Emmet County

Littlefield

Alanson

99

221

81

82

65

147

7

175

14

189

7

92

106

198

-

Recreation

7

5

12

10

Commercial

8

1

9

13

Industrial

2

12

14

-

52

-

52

13

378

550

928

51

Seasonal
Public Uses
Quasi-Public
+

TOTAL

122

Residential

►
I

Springvale

Railroads
Roads

DISTRICT
TOTAL
302
16%
154
8%
196
10%
198
10%
22
1%
22
1%
14
1%
65
3%
979
50%

--

TOTAL

SOURCE:

918

Vilican-Leman

853

l,77oac.

&amp; Associates, Inc .

182

l,952ac.
100%

Land Use Inventory, Summer, 1968

j

�I

APPENDIX TABLE 5
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICTS NO'S 5-11
Emmet County

Bear Creek
Residential

0,

TOTAL

· Peto·skey

335

142

477

335

98

66

164

-

Public Uses

333

20

353

76

Quasi-Public

186

2

188

264

Recreation

298

14

312

128

Commercial

64

19

83

59

Industrial

10

150

160

66

Railroads

116

70

186

61

Roads

909

504

1,413

279

2,349

987

3,336ac.

Seasonal Homes

►
I

Resort

TOTAL

SOURCE :

Vi lican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc .

1,268

DISTRICT
TOTAL
812
18%
164
4%
429
9%
452
10%
440
9%
142
3%
226
5%
247
5%
1,692
37%
4,604ac.
100 %

Land Use Inventory , Summer, 1968

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008111">
                <text>Emmet-County_Comprehensive-Plan-for-Sewer-and-Water-Facilities_1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008112">
                <text>Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008113">
                <text>McNamee, Porter &amp; Seeley</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008114">
                <text>1971-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008115">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan for Sewer and Water Facilities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008116">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan for Sewer and Water Facilities was prepared by Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc. and McNamee, Porter &amp; Seeley in April 1971. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008117">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008118">
                <text>Emmet County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008119">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008121">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008122">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008123">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008124">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038313">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54730" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59001">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/f135a25cbf675a6f08d4acb017458e5e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>af15327478e1f4d7f638252a7623b8e0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008773">
                    <text>��Acknowledgments

City of Kalamazoo
City Commission Members

Mayor Francis P. Hamilton
Vice Mayor Robert D. Dunbar
Edwin L. Walters
Caroline R. Ham
Dr. Raymond L. Hightower
Patricia Cayemberg
Moses L. Walker

The Kalamazoo Planning
Commission

Dr. Richard Schreiber, Chairperson
Robert Hannah, Vice Chairperson
The Rev. Braxton V. Burgess, Member
Ann Gerould, Member
Brooks Godfrey, Member
Martha Moffet, Member
Helen Nelson, Member
Henry J. Schaberg, Member
Judy Shamu, Member
Past members:
Patricia Michael
Willie Mae Pierson
William Rae

City Manager

Robert C. Bobb

The Department of
Community Development

G. Michael Conlisk, Director
Evan M. LeDuc, Head Planning Division
Gary Niemeck, Chief Planner
Allen White, Senior Planner
Eileen Davis, Associate Planner
Mark DuBay, Associate Planner
James Visser, Associate Planner
Carrol Deweese, Secretary
Jerrie Dierks, Secretary
Linda Robinson, Secretary
Other Contributors:
Sheryl Sculley
Brian Chase

Preparation and Financing

The Kalamazoo Planning Commission

Preparation of this report was financed in part through
the urban planning grant from the Department of Housing
and Urban Development, under provisions of Section 701 of the
Housing Act of 154, as amended. The study was prepared
for the City of Kalamazoo, December, 1976.

��June 1977

iii

City of Kalamazoo
-

Preface

-

The Comprehensive Plan represents a synthesis of information
and ideas produced as a result of data collection and analysis,
position papers developed from neighborhood public meetings,
and numerous meetings of the Planning Commission, both formal
and informal. The plan is intended to provide a context for
determining policies needed to preserve and enhance the
quality of life in Kalamazoo, as well as to serve as a practical
working guide for City Commission decisions. It allows the City
Commission to present to the community a unified picture of
long-range policies, and it enables the community to understand
and anticipate Commission decisions in the context of
long-range planning.
Although Kalamazoo's plan is designed as a guide to the city's
development through 1990, changes in the patterns of human
activity require that the plan be flexible and adaptable. While
planning lends stability, continuity, and rationality to change,
no plan is ever rigidly fixed. Kalamazoo's plan ensures that the
impact of change will be beneficial to the community; at the
same time, it allows the city to adapt to the naturally
changing forces of human activity.
Finally, the plan is a neighborhood-oriented document. Although
this summary reflects a citywide analysis of land use,
transportation, community facilities, etc., it is oriented toward
meeting neighborhood as well as citywide needs. The constant
involvement of neighborhood and community residents will be
required as the plan is continually refined and adapted to
changing conditions, and as the tools needed to implement the
plan are fashioned. The success or failure of the plan as a
practical guide for preserving and enhancing the living
environment of Kalamazoo hinges on the support of the
people of Kalamazoo.
This summary of the Comprehensive Plan is divided into major
technical sections: Land Use, Transportation, Utilities, and
Community Facilities. A glossary of terms has been provided
at the end of each section for the convenience of the reader.
The sections are made up of summaries of several lengthy and
detailed technical reports which constitute the Comprehensive
Plan. The summary also contains sections describing planning
goals, strategies, and potential implementation techniques and
areas of special concern related to the plan. Although the
summary is quite lengthy, the Planning Commission favors a
comprehensive report that provides usable substance.

Advance Planning Section, Department of Community Development

�Table of Contents

iv

Comprehensive Plan
iii
viii

Preface
Introduction

1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Goals, Strategies and Potential Implementation Techniqu_e_s_ __

I
.,
I
~

I

Fundamental Goals of Kalamazoo's Plan
3
General
Goal for Land Use Planning
5
---------------- ----------------_
12 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _G
_e
_n_e_r_a_l G~~r Tr_a_
ns_,p_o_rt_a_t_io_n_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
General
Goal
for
Community
Facilities
15
- - - - -- --------- -- ----------General Goal for Water Management
19
Use Component
24 - - - - - - - - - - - - -Land
--- -~-----------------Residential Element
27
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- Scope
27
Recommendations
29
-----------------Housing Element
30
30
Scope
32
Recommendations
33
Commercial Element
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - 33
Scope
-'-----------------------34
Recommendations
--------------35
Cent r aI Business District
35
Sco_p~
__ _
38
Recommendations
----39
Industrial Element
----- --- 40
Scope
41
Recommendations
- - - - -- - - - - - - - 42
0 pen Space Element
---42
Scope
42
Recommendations
-------43
FI o o d Plain Element
43
Sco~- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 44
Recommendations
--- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - -44
Fiscal Impact
- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - 46
Land Use Glossary
72
Transportation Component
--------------~--------------75
Streets and Highways Element
75
Scope

77

61
81
84
85
85
86
86
87
87

Recommendations
- - - - - - - - - - -Ra i I roads Element
Scope
Recommendations
Metro Transit Element
Scope
Recommendations
Airport Element
Scope
Recommendations

- -- - - - - --

�Table of Contents

V

City of Kalamazoo
88
94

Transportation Glossary
Community Facilities Component
Mun icipal Admin istrative C~nter, Police and Court Facilities
Scope
Recommend ations
----Fire Facilities
--Sco pe
Recomm end ations
-Library Facilities
--Scope
Recommendations
-Health Service Facilities
Scope
Recommendations
Neighborhood Centers
School Facilities
Scope
Recommendations
- - - - - ----- - - Cultural/Fine Arts Amenities
Scope
Recommendations

97
97
98
98
98
98
99
99
99
100
100
102
103
103
103
108
109
109
109
122
~_!ilities Co~p~nen~
125
Wate.!:__Utility Element
126
Scope
127
Recomm endations
-------128
Storm Drainage Element
128
Scope
129
Recommend ations
130
Wastewater Treatment Element
130
Scope
132
Recommendations
-------------------------132
Semi-Public Utilities
134
Utilities Glossary
142
Special Areas of Concern
---------------------------145
Population and Employment Profile
149
Citizen Involvement
152
Historic Preservation Statement
------------------------153
Environment aI Consideration Statement
------------------------------156
Energy Consideration Statement
157
Equal Opportunity Statement
---"-----------------157
Needs of Handicapped Residents
---------------164
Tech n i ca I Studies Bibliography
-

�Guide to Tables

vi

Comprehensive Plan
Table

Subject

Page

1

Comparison: Current Zoning and Land Use
to Proposed Land Use

65

2

Comparison: Current and Future Residential
Land Use

65

3

Comparison: Future Population to Potential
Housing Units

66

4

Median Annual Income for Families

67

5

Comparison of National Standards to Kalamazoo's
Commercial Land Use

68

6

Suggested Alternatives: Commercial

69

7

Summary of Annual Fiscal Impact Results for
Redevelopment Alternative A

70

---------------

70
Summary of Fiscal Impact Results for
Redevelopment Alternative B
---------------------------------70
9
Summary: Annual Fiscal Impact Results
New Growth Area -Alternative A
8

Summary: Annual Fiscal Impact Results
New Growth Area -Alternative B

11

118
Kalamazoo Area School Enrollment Trends
----- ----- --------118
1976 Enrollment by Public School Type

12

13

•

70

10

14
15
16
17

18
19

Projected Kalamazoo Area School Enrollment Trends
118
------Elementary School Inventory
119
Junior High School and High School Inventory
--Kalamazoo County Population Projections

120
161

1976 Vacant Acreage to be Developed Residentially
161
------162
Net Change in Dwelling Units: Based on
Density Measures
- ----Population and Employment Growth Rates in
162
Kalamazoo County

�Guide to Figures

vii

City of Kalamazoo
Figure

1

Subject

Page

Proposed Land Use

49

2

Census Tracts

50

3

Housing Deficiencies

- - ----------

51

----------------4

---

Area Retail Centers

52

5

Potential Sites for Commercial Development
within the CBD

53

6

Existing Housing in the CBD

54

7

Amenities in the CBD

55

8

Proposed Residential Development
Areas within the CBD

56

9

New Reutilized, and Abandoned
Industrial Sites

57

Areas Targeted for Industrial Redevelopment

58

11

Entryway Greenspace Corridors

59

12

Recreational Trails

60

13

100-Year Floodplain

61

14

Possible Redevelopment Areas Tested for
Cost-Revenue Consequences

62

15

Possi bIe Residential Development Area Tested for
Cost-Revenue Consequences

63
63

16

Arter i aI Designation

89

Proposed Traffic Flow: CBD

90

Phase I Short-Range Rail Solutions

91

Existing Route Structure and ¼ Mile Service Area

92

10

----

----~--

------

----

----------------

17

---------

-------------------

---~------

18
19

-------

20

Fire Stations and Travel Distances

21

Library Facilities

111

-----------112

Health Care Facilities

113

23

Kalamazoo Public School District

114

24

School locations

115

25

Institutions of Higher Education

116

26

Growth of the Service Area

136

27

Projected Service Districts

137

28

CBD Water Main Upgrading

138

29

Proposed Channel Work

139

30

Wastewater Planning Area

140

31

Census Tracts

159

22

---

�Introduction

viii

Comprehensive Plan
Section six of Michigan Public Act 285 (1931) charges the
Planning Commission with legal responsibility to "make and
adopt a master plan for the physical development of the
municipality." This introduction briefly explains the
characteristics, purposes, and goals of contemporary planning,
and the particular goals of Kalmazoo's Comprehensive Plan.
The Purpose and Functions
of Planning

Section seven of the same state law describes the general
purpose of the plan as guiding
a coordinated, adjusted, and harmonious development of the
municipality and its environs which will, in accordance with
present and future needs, best promote health, safety, morals,
order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare, as well as
efficiency and economy in the process of development.
The purpose of this plan is to protect the health, safety, and well
being of community residents through the promotion of a
harmonious and efficient pattern of urban growth and
development. Preserving and enhancing the quality of the urban
living environment requires using imagination in planning what
the city could be. An effective plan will preserve and expand the
city's assets in order to make the city more beautiful, peaceful,
exciting, and innovative as a place to live.

•

The quality of the urban environment depends upon many things:
cleanliness of air and water, beauty and function of aspects of
the urban landscape (buildings, streets, parks, and open spaces},
and diversity of life styles enjoyed by the residents. Historical,
cultural, educational, and recreational assets are all considered
within the Comprehensive Plan.
Fundamental to the successful preservation of these desirable
assets is the city's economic base, dependent upon energy and
utility resources and the transportation network. Housing supply
is a critical element in any consideration of urban
living environments.
Planning, therefore, must be realistic about needs and about
the potential for meeting those needs; it must develop practical
guides to action, it must be comprehensive; it must provide
flexibility; and, most important, it must serve rather than
dominate the many varieties of human needs and activities.
All human activities are linked to one another in some fashion,
and a change in one activity pattern affects other human
activities. A truly comprehensive plan, then, not only accounts
for a wide range of human activities, but also recognizes how
activities are linked.

�Introduction

ix

City of Kalamazoo
------

-

--

----------

The recognition that human activities are linked, however,
cautions that limits must be placed on the comprehensiveness
of planning. While public planning ensures that the lives of
citizens will be enhanced, their rights and privacy must be
preserved. This plan will enable Kalamazoo's residents to make
rationally guided improvements in the city's environment which
enhance their ability to conduct their own private affairs
successfully and in harmony with one another.
The plan must be flexible not only because human activities are
constantly changing, but also because human behavior is
unpredictable. A rigid document having no provision for
amendment becomes quickly obsolete. Yet, a plan that lends
stability and continuity to the city's development is essential.
This plan permits adaption to the changing forces of human
activity while ensuring that the impact of change is beneficial
to the community. The Planning Commission recommends,
within the plan, a five-year update to ensure adaptation to change.
State Act 285 and City Ordinance 340 allow the Planning
Commission to amend or adopt portions of the Comprehensive
Plan. The public is provided with opportunity to participate in the
amendment procedure through a required public hearing.
The Planning Commission is also charged with preparing, each
year, a capital improvement program that projects needed
public improvements six years into the future.
The legal amendment procedures of the plan lend stability and
continuity to Kalamazoo's development. Although this plan is
meant to be a general guide to future development, no serious
deviations from it may be undertaken without the approval of at
least six of the nine members of the Planning Commission.
Major land use changes, for example, must be considered
according to the degree of conformance to the Comprehensive
Plan. If the land use change results in amending the provisions
of the plan, a two-thirds vote of the Planning Commission is
needed to honor the request. By city ordinance, the City
Commission retains final authority for approving the plan before
it goes into effect. State law grants the City Commission authority
to overrule any recommendation (including amendments) of the
Planning Commission. Both actions require a two-thirds
vote of the City Commission.
Planning is oriented toward developing goals, cataloging needs,
and proposing courses of action in order to approach the future
with a clearer idea of what lies ahead. Planning must constantly
monitor the patterns of urban activity and prepare for the impact
of change on the lives of urban dwellers. Because Kalamazoo
will continue to grow and develop, planning will help guide the
change for the well being of all the community's residents.

���Goals and Strategies

3

City of Kalamazoo
The overall goal of this Comprehensive Plan is to improve the
quality of living for every Kalamazoo resident. To achieve this
primary goal, the Planning Commission has defined eight
fundamental planning goals and potential strategies for
attaining them.
Fundamental Goals

1 To Improve the Residential Environment
by eliminating substandard housing; stabilizing residential
neighborhoods through effective land development controls;
increasing the variety of housing choice; expanding recreation
and open space areas; providing design standards to ensure
compatible land uses within residential areas; prescribing
reasonable densities required for prevention of overcrowding;
ensuring reasonable traffic volumes on residential streets;
encouraging development of new residential areas which provide
for land-use mixtures on a planned basis; and encouraging a
proper mixture of compatible land uses required to produce an
interesting and functional residential living environment.
2 To Strengthen and Diversity the Economy

by renewing and expanding industrial areas; improving
transportation facilities, strengthening the central business
district; establishing and encouraging outlying shopping areas
to serve neighborhood needs; supporting expansion needs of
institutions for higher learning, research and medical care;
providing incentives for industrial and commercial location and
expansion within the City of Kalamazoo; and implementing and
accelerating, through educational and special training programs,
the development of resources to assure an adequate work force
for industry, business, commerce and the professions.
3 To Strengthen and Enhance the Environmental Quality

by identifying areas of unique environmental value and preserving
them in their natural state; preventing use of the flood plain for
intensive urban development; placing reasonable controls on the
use of signs, promoting visual responsibility through design
ordinances and cooperative programs with business and
industry; making greater public use of the Kalamazoo River and
Portage Creek; and providing open space in all areas to serve
as urban breathing spaces.
4 To Enlarge Human Opportunities

by increasing employment opportunities and ensuring equal
opportunity; improving public services; supporting freedom and
equality of housing choice throughout the city; and increasing
the variety of housing choice within residential neighborhoods.
5 To Develop Safe and Efficient Transportation Systems

by improving air and rail services for the region; continuing
promotion of a multi-modal transportation center in the central
business district; encouraging the compatibility of air and rail
service with other land uses; alleviating rail/highway conflicts;

�Goals and Strategies

4

Comprehensive Plan
promoting rescheduling of local train and auto traffic to reduce
peak hour traffic loads; providing public mass transit systems;
implementing park-and-ride, car pool and incentive-parking
programs; encouraging the separation of high-speed through
and local traffic; improving the operational characteristics of
arterials; discouraging through traffic within neighborhoods;
and protecting the community against dominance by
auto-related land uses.
6 To Develop, Maintain, and Plan for Adequate Community Facilities
by encouraging the development of adequate energy sources for
present and future needs at the lowest possible cost; providing
efficient utility systems which fulfill present and future
developmental needs; developing a fire protection system that
meets response-time requirements with ease; encouraging the
establishment of a cooperative emergency service system;
providing for the present and future space needs of the city's
police and district court operations and administrative offices;
maintaining and improving citywide public health services and
facilities; providing recreational facilities both on a neighborhood
and on a community-wide basis; promoting the multiple use of
educational facilities for all age groups; and encouraging an
adequate library system to meet the needs of all segments of
the population.

7 To Meet Areawide Planning Needs
by cooperating on issues of mutual concern, especially in the
areas of residential, commercial, and industrial development to
ensure the proper utilization of the region's resources.
8 To Ensure Efficient Use of Areawide Energy Resources

by conserving energy through reduction of waste in private and
public use; adjusting thermal-efficiency standards for new
construction; encouraging innovative, energy-saving approaches
to building design and construction; encouraging home
winterization; incorporating rational land use and transportation
elements into this plan that result in reducing energy waste;
utilizing liquid and solid refuse-derived fuels for city facilities
and/ or for sale to private users; and cooperating in a regional
solid-waste recovery program.

�Goal and Land Use

----------------■
5
--

---------

City of Kalamazoo

tiff

�Goals and Strategies

6

Comprehensive Plan
To ensure the safe, healthy, aesthetic, and efficient development
of the city's physical, social, cultural, and economic systems
through the promotion of harmonious land-use relationships.
Residential Land Use Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

Protect, preserve, and improve the quality of the residential
environment, ensuring the availability of land and the balanced
and harmonious future of residential development.
1 Protect viable residential neighborhoods from the intrusion of
adverse land use and intensity of use through:
a correction of existing incompatible or potentially incompatible
land uses by rezoning and other techniques,
b amending the zoning ordinance to ensure reasonable
neighborhood intensities,
c encouraging harmonious new development.
2 Upgrade and improve residential neighborhoods showing signs
of deterioration through:
a rezoning where adverse land uses have affected the viability
of the residential area,
b rehabilitation of residential structures to protect the
neighborhood environment,
c capital expenditures on streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks
to enhance the residential environment.
3 Increase the amount of land available for residential purposes by:
a abolishing substandard units,
b reuse of excess commercially and industrially zoned land for
residential purposes,
c rezoning unneeded industrially zoned land for residential use,
d rezoning suitable vacant land for residential purposes.

Housing Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

Protect, preserve, and improve the quality and quantity of housing,
ensuring availability and choice for area residents.
Preserve the existing housing inventory and ensure its value by:
1 a providing continual neighborhood improvements to extend
housing life,
b encouraging housing maintenance for individual structures,
c requiring reasonable housing densities,
d strictly enforcing an equitable housing and building code.
2 Upgrade the deficient housing stock by:
a rehabilitating and/ or redeveloping blighted or
declining housing,
b requiring occupancy permits for rental units,
c strictly enforcing housing and building code requirements.

�Goals for Land Use

7

City of Kalamazoo
3 Increase the supply and broaden the choices of the city's
housing through:
a effective use of funding mechanisms designed to stimulate
private construction,
b adoption of policies to aid in reduction of home
construction costs,
c encouraging new and innovative forms of residential
development,
d allowing some mixed-use development (re idential with
limited commercial/office) in residential areas adjacent to
existing commercial centers or along major arterial streets.
4 Widening housing oppo'rtunities for low-income households by:
a encouraging formation of an areawide low-income
housing program,
b ensuring the construction of housing for low-income families
in dispersed locations, citywide,
c encouraging adoption of federal or other rent subsidy
programs for those in need.
Commercial Land Use Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To provide for the commercial needs of area residents through
the planned development and redevelopment of varied and
convenient shopping areas.
1 Better utilization of commercially zoned land by:
a limiting commercial expansion to designated commercial
centers or within multi-use developments as future
demands dictate,
b encouraging planned unified development of neighborhood,
community and regional shopping areas,
c designating nonviable commercial uses with little potential
for rehabilitation as a noncompatible land use,
d permitting existing viable neighborhood or community-oriented
individual commercial uses as an allowable noncompatible
land use,
e establishing a new wholesale and warehouse district,
meeting the locational need to be close to commercial centers.
2 Preservation and strengthening of existing commercial centers by:
a encouraging variety and intensity of activities in commercial
areas so they properly relate to the neighborhood
and/or community,
b limiting commercial centers to convenience shopping,
c developing design standards and criteria insuring
compatibility with surrounding land uses,
d aiding the private sector to develop and enhance commercial
centers, incorporating such features as:
i) common parking areas and circulation designs,
ii) landscaping for visual appearance and buffering effects,
iii) sign design to fulfill a function without creating unnecessary
visual blight,

�Proposed historic commercial district, Michigan Avenue

�Goals for Land Use

10

Comprehensive Plan
iv) architectural design qualities which blend in and complement
the surrounding land uses,
v) restricted curb-cuts and traffic access lanes.
3 Encourage maintenance and growth of the Central Business
District (CBD) by:
a retaining and attracting central city functions such as
professional and commercial offices in the CBD,
b encouraging retail growth which will ensure that the CBD
remains the commercial focal point of the city,
c encouraging medium and high density residential development
intheCBD,
d retaining the city's administrative offices in the CBD,
e maintaining and improving the design quality of the CBD
f ensuring access from all parts of the city to the CBD especially the Mall and Bronson Park areas - by auto, metro,
and area transportation.
Industrial Land Use Goal

Implementation Techniques
Strategies and Potential

Encourage maximum industrial development of the city in order
to supply employment for its residents and improve Kalamazoo's
tax base.
1 Better utilization of industrially zoned land by:
a curtailing non-industrial development in industrial districts,
b ensuring availability of all utilities, i.e., power, water and
sewer in industrial districts,
c improving and maintaining the industrial transportation
system, i.e., rail, highway and air service.
2 Preservation and augmentation of the existing industrial areas by:
a developing design standards and criteria that ensure
compatibility with surrounding land uses,
b implementing programs for redeveloping abandoned and
deteriorated industrial sites in properly located and well
serviced areas,
c aiding in the consolidation of industrial redevelopment sites
by the vacation of streets and alleys to accommodate large
industrial redevelopment,
d encouraging industrial redevelopment through economic
means available to the city, such as Act 198, Industrial Revenue
Bonds, and all other ways possible.
3 Promote economic growth and increase Kalamazoo's
industrial tax base by:
a establishing city bonding for industrial development,
b extending utilities to new areas through cooperation,
c encouraging retraining programs to ensure an appropriately
skilled labor supply,

Open Space Goal

To encourage proper expansion, growth, maintenance, and
programs for the open space, parks, and recreation systems
in Kalamazoo.

�Goals for Land Use

11

City of Kalamazoo
Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

1 Encourage the wise use of land, water and human resources.
2 Preserve quality open space lands.
3 Carry out an extensive program of tree maintenance and planting.
4 Develop and expand river front areas for open space, parks
and recreational activities.
5 Establish a trail and bike path system connecting major parks
throughout the city.
6 Develop neighborhood parks and playgrounds in each
neighborhood.
7 Establish written policies for the implementation of the
park/school systems.
8 Improve maintenance of all area facilities.
9 Evaluate the total system and its subcomponents for effectiveness.
10 Identify environmentally unique areas.

Flood Plain Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To ensure judicious utilization of the flood plain while
minimizing potential flood damage.
1 Improve utilization of floodplain areas by:
a Establishing effective floodplain management standards
which protect new construction from future flooding,
b Rezoning to limit floodplain users to purposes which do not
unduly suffer from the action of floods, with such uses based
upon performance standards in the flood fringe and flood way.
2 Assist existing uses in the floodplain by:
a Publicizing and encouraging participation in the floodplain
insurance program.
3 Encourage the enlargement of open space areas in the
floodplain by:
a Targeting high flood-hazard areas for open space uses,
b Assisting in the redevelopment of these areas through the
acquisition and demolition of deterioriating structures,
c Capitalizing upon the aesthetic assets of the city's water bodies
to obtain funding to acquire land and monitor open space areas.

�Goals for Transportation

13

City of Kalamazoo
Streets and Highways Goals

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To develop a safe and efficient multi-modal transportation
system while preserving the integrity of the neighborhoods.
To minimize the widening of existing streets within Kalamazoo,
except where operational improvements require widening at
intersections; and to limit the construction of new facilities to
those that ensure a more efficient and balanced
circulation system.
1 Improve the operational characteristics of artP.rials by:
a implementing a detection system for timing traffic signals,
b removing on-street parking,
c limiting left hand turns,
d contra-flow
e relieving 90 degree turns,
f improving connections to the Central Business District (CBD}
and all areas of the city,
g continuing to monitor data concerning traffic demand and to
develop other implementation techniques.
2 Increase vehicle occupancy by:
a implementing car and van pooling programs,
b implementing incentive-parking programs,
c distributing peak-hour traffic over a longer time frame by
staggering work hours in major employment centers.
3 Reduce traffic deficiencies by:
a increasing auto occupancy,
b increasing bus ridership.
4 Discouraging through traffic within neighborhoods by:
a working with each area to determine collector streets,
b developing certain controls to channel locally generated
traffic to the arterial network,
c designating intra-city truck routes.
5 Provide adequate pathways for pedestrian traffic and ensure the
rights of the pedestrian, particularly on major arterials such as
West Michigan, West Main Street and Westnedge Avenue.

Railroads Goal

To continue and to improve rail service in Kalamazoo, and to
coordinate it with other means of transportation.
1 Solve the rail/highway conflict within the CBD and other
problem areas by:
a coordinating track relocation and improving connections to
reduce auto-rail conflicts and improve operations,
b supporting operational projects intended to monitor local
auto/rail traffic,
c promoting the rescheduling of local train traffic to non-peak
hours of auto traffic,

�Goals for Transportation

14

Comprehensive Plan
d seeking financial assistance from state and federal sources
for the construction of rail improvements needed to alleviate
rail/highway conflicts.
2 Promote the upgrading of rail trackage in Kalamazoo by:
a remaining active in the evaluation process of essential/
non-essential track designations through:
i) discouraging the abandonment of essential lines,
ii) considering the purchase of abandoned rights-of-way,
b coordinating an ongoing inventory system of all rail lines in
the city including ownership, status and condition,
c coordinating the preparation of a complete inventory of all
rail-highway crossings,
d coordinating an ongoing priority program for crossing
upgrading with concurrence of the two railroads,
e seeking financial assistance from state and federal sources
to accomplish the upgradings.
Metro Transit Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To expand the use and continue development of an attractive,
comfortable and dependable mass transit system, which moves
citizens to their desired destinations.
1 Provide better and expanded bus service by:
a modifying existing routes where proven necessaryfor example: peripheral service,
b implementing the limited demand/response service.
2 Improve the perception of Metro Transit as a transportation
choice by:
a surveying existing patronage and latent demand,
b adjusting service to meet changing needs.
3 Continue to serve the elderly and handicapped with specially
equipped vehicles.
4 Continue to investigate innovative means of mass transportation
in Kalamazoo.

Airport Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To provide air facilities and services that are safe, adequate,
convenient, well regulated, and of an appropriate quality.
1 To provide noise abatement and safety measures in the interest
of an improved airport environment.
2 To improve only as necessary the operational capabilities
of the Kalamazoo Municipal Airport.
3 To decrease the adverse environmental effects perceived by
the residential areas surrounding the Kalamazoo Municipal
Airport.

�Goals for Community Facilities

16

Comprehensive Plan
To attain a satisfactory aesthetic and functional relationship
between public facilities, transportation, and residential
neighborhoods.
Administrative Center Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To assure the accessibility of municipal offices to the people
they serve, while meeting the space requirements demanded by
increased administration.
1 Maintain the existing city administrative center by:
a developing a detailed urban design plan of the area,
b encouraging a complementary relationship with any
additional municipal facility constructed in the vicinity
of City Hall,
c ensuring the availability of public transportation and parking
in the area.
2 Accommodate the existing and future space needs of
Kalamazoo's administrative center complex by:
a expanding City Hall through the construction of a municipal
office annex,
b encouraging the continued modification of city office
organization and efficiency.

Police and Court Facilities Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

Fire Protection Facilities Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

Library Facilities Goal

To accomplish the basic mission of providing efficient police
and court service within the City of Kalamazoo.
1 Accommodate the serious space deficiencies of both police
and court operations by:
a expanding the existing building at its present site,
b encouraging relocation of the District Court,
c ensuring the availability of public transportation and
parking in the area.
To provide adequate fire protection to all areas of the city,
with facilities, manpower, and equipment distributed
according to need.
1 Develop a fire protection system which places every point of
Kalamazoo within a response time roughly equivalent to a
one-and-one-half-mile service radius by:
a providing for the most appropriate and efficient locations
for fire stations,
b coordinating new site selections with the improvement plan
for major streets,
c encouraging area-wide fire service agreements between the
city and adjacent townships.
To develop a system of facilities located to encourage library
use and to offer service to all age and interest groups.

�Goals for Community Facilities

17

City of Kalamazoo
Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

1 Continue to improve the availability and accessibility of
library facilities by:
a relocating branches to serve existing needs better,
b locating libraries in businss centers,
c expanding branches in areas currently lacking service.
2 Accommodate the space deficiencies of the present central
library by:
a expanding the existing building at its present site,
b encouraging the location of a parking structure within the
immediate area.

Health Service Facilities Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To assure that the entire spectrum of modern health services
and facilities is readily available to all Kalamazoo citizens.
1 Maintain and improve citywide health facilities and services by:
a encouraging a continuous dialogue between major providers
of health services concerning area needs and potential
programs,
b continuing the availability of health services to all residents
of Kalamazoo through proper location of potential clinic
programs.
2 Minimize the adverse effects of expansion or new construction
of medical facilities on the surrounding neighborhood by:
a encouraging land-banking programs for future development,
b recognizing hospitals as major traffic generators within the
city's traffic circulation system,
c providing adequate parking for both employees and visitors
under carefully specified conditions such as:
i) special set-back,
ii) landscaping,
iii) off-street parking,
iv) screening requirements.

School Facilities Goal

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To meet the physical needs of the Kalamazoo educational system
through a combination of programs, physical improvements,
and administrative techniques.
1 Provide a basis for continued coordination of school programming
and physical development.
2 Develop a system for multiple use of school buildings and
recreation areas which meets educational needs and is flexible
in use by:
a coordinating site selection within a park-link system,
b encouraging the continued evening and weekend use of
schools,
c combining indoor and outdoor recreation facilities for use by
both park and school systems.

�Goals for Community Facilities

18

Comprehensive Plan
3 Promote the reuse of abandoned school facilities for other
appropriate uses such as neighborhood centers.
4 Provide advice and assistance to private schools seeking new
locations or having expansion needs.
5 Continue the coordination of planning activities between
the city, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo College,
and Nazareth College.
Cultural/Fine Arts
Amenities Goal
Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

To encourage the retention and expansion of existing
cultural/fine arts amenities in Kalamazoo.
1 Coordinate expansion of cultural amenities facilities to:
a reduce negative conditions restricting facilities growth,
b minimize potential traffic, parking and other neighborhood
problems resulting from amenities growth.
2 Encourage reutilization of vacant school facilities to house
fine arts amenities.

�Goals for Water Management

- - - - - - - - 19

City of Kalamazoo

I

I

�Goals for Water Management

20

Comprehensive Plan
To manage Kalamazoo's water resources and uses in order to
ensure an adequate supply of quality water resources,
proper use of those resources, and an environmentally safe
distribution and disposal of those resources.
Water Utility Goal

Strategies and P,otential
Implementation Techniques

To encourage cooperative water resource management in the
Kalamazoo Metropolitan Area, so that adequate and responsive
service and high water quality is provided to the consuming
public at the lowest reasonable cost.
1 Continue to provide a water supply and distribution system to
serve adequately and responsively the existing and projected
population by:
a ensuring a highly efficient and effective management of the
city's pumping operations.
b maintaining the capability to provide adequate water flow
through planned maintenance, renovation, and expansion
of the city's pumping facilities,
c maintaining operations through continuous collection of
relevant data, and preparation of engineering, planning,
and financial reports.
2 Maintain the purity and quality of Kalamazoo's water as set by
federal or more stringent standards.
3 Safeguard our natural water resources from overuse and
pollution by:
a preserving the environment around our water supply through
proper land use practices,
b planning for and acquisition of water supply sites as needed
preserves for the present and the future,
c monitoring water quality data continuously and preparing
annual reports for guidance and planning,
d cooperating with recreational agencies to ensure that multiple
uses of water resource areas are environmentally compatible.
4 Continuing coordination of water utility planning and
management through cooperation with all Kalamazoo area
governments and water agencies by:
a developing mechanisms for cooperation in current water
utility management activities,
b developing mechanisms for planning for future area-wide
water utility needs,
c coordinating water utility, storm water drainage, and
wastewater management and planning.

Wastewater Treatment Goal

To enhance public health and welfare through providing an
adequate and environmentally safe method of wastewater
collection and treatment in the Kalamazoo Metropolitan Area.

�Goals for Water Management

21

City of Kalamazoo
Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

1 Provide environmentally safe sewage treatment through:
a strict adherence to state and federal requirements regarding
wastewater treatment,
b continuous monitoring of the demand on the capacity of
Kalamazoo's treatment facility,
c enlarging the treatment facility to ensure adequate treatment
on a predictable demand basis,
d minimizing the potential for ground water contamination.
2 Ensure comprehensive and coordinated coverage of a logical
service area within the metropolitan area by:
a continuing to lead in the development of a consolidated
area-wide collection and treatment system,
b continuously monitoring area-wide growth and responding
with extension of the service systems within guidelines
established in Kalamazoo's Comprehensive Plan,
c coordinating where possible the scheduling of wastewater,
storm water, and street and road construction.
3 Assure the citizens of the City of Kalamazoo an equitable
user-charge system by:
a equalizing any new construction costs fairly throughout the
service area,
b ensuring that operation and maintenance costs are shared
proportionately by all service recipients.

Storm Water Drainage Goal

To enhance public health and welfare by providing an
environmentally sound method of channelling and retaining
storm water to minimize flooding.

Strategies and Potential
Implementation Techniques

1 Provide storm sewers of sufficient size to handle runoff by:
a constructing relief sewers where necessary,
b requiring short duration on site storage in new construction,
in accordance with state law.
2 Maintain and improve natural drainage courses by:
a utilizing retention facilities to prevent siltation,
b cleaning and rechannelling stream channels to allow for
maximum flow and capacity.
3 Require the use of all storm water retention and recharge
basins by:
a purchasing and developing property needed for such use,
b encouraging private developers to utilize temporary storage
facilities before releasing runoff into the public
storm-sewer system.

�Goals for Water Management

22

Comprehensive Plan
4 Encourage land uses that reflect environmentally sound
drainage needs by:
a encouraging the use of streams, valleys and flood plains
as park or natural areas,
b encouraging significant open space, pervious surfaces, or
other storm water disposal techniques in the development of
apartment, commercial, and manufacturing complexes.
5 Provide mechanisms of cooperation and coordination in storm
water drainage systems by:
a cooperating with other area governments and agencies to
control storm flows of those streams in the city whose
tributary area is in part outside the city,
b coordinating water utility and storm drain management to make
better use of storm runoff as a water resource,
c cooperating with other area governments and agencies to
purify and treat storm water where necessary in accordance
with state law.

���Land Use Component

27

City of Kalamazoo
Introduction

ll

The Land Use Component of the Comprehensive Plan designates
the amount and location of land to be used for future residential,
commercial, industrial, and recreational purposes within the City
of Kalamazoo (see Figure 1). The Plan, in depicting how, where,
and to what degree future land development and/or
redevelopment should occur, is a step toward the achievement
of the community's fundamental planning goals, as adopted by
the City Planning Commission. These goals include the
improvement of Kalamazoo's residential environment, the
strengthening and diversification of the local economy,
the enhancement of the city's environmental quality, and the
expansion of opportunities for area residents. The Land Use
Component contributes to the realization of these goals by
allocating land to meet the city's current and projected needs
for particular land uses, by arranging land in an efficient and
rational manner and by minimizing the intermixture of land uses
which might have adverse effects upon one another or upon the
community as a whole. The plan stresses the importance of
protecting the integrity of Kalamazoo's viable
residential neighborhoods.
The Land Use Component of the Comprehensive Plan consists
of four separate elements or plans: residential, commercial,
industrial, and recreational. A series of technical reports have
been prepared in conjunction with the development of each
of the plans. These reports analyze in great detail the city's
current land use in relation to area-wide socio-economic trends
as a means of isolating community needs and/or problems with
respect to land use. Using the analyses in the reports, alternative
solutions have been formulated to remedy community problems
and recommended strategies have been developed to meet
community needs. Many of the recommended strategies and
alternative solutions are discussed in the following summary
of the Land Use Component. (Table 1 compares current land
use to the proposed land use plan.)

Residential Element

Based on an extensive statistical analysis of current
neighborhood conditions and a series of neighborhood meetings
conducted to gather citizen input, the Planning Commission
adopted policy positions concerning future neighborhood
development and/ or redevelopment. On the basis of the
neighborhood policy positions, the Residential Element of the
Land Use Component was formulated. The major purpose
of this element is to allocate currently vacant land for future
residential use and to recommend changes, if necessary,
in previously developed residential and nonresidential areas.

Scope

The Residential Element of the Land Use Component designates
not only the amount and location of land intended for residential
use, but also its probable density and intensity of use. Density is
defined as the number of residential units per acre of land;
intensity of use, on the other hand, reflects the physical character

�28

Land Use Component

Comprehensive Plan
of the residential development. A density classification of low,
medium, and high was used in the residential land-use planning
process: 1-4 dwelling units per acre (du/a) is low; 5-10 du/a is
medium; and 11 du/ a or more is considered high. Table 2
compares the current residential land use to the proposed
residential land use plan. The results indicate that the proposed
plan would expand the amount of residential land by some
1,369.53 acres. Most of the land increase would be targeted for
low-intensity development, permitting multi-use construction
within the required 1-4 du/ a. This would allow the city to
accommodate 5,000 more residential structures than existed in
1975 (see Table 3).
Given this data, the city's ability to hold additional housing units
or, more technically, its residential "holding capacity" was found
to have an upper limit of 33-34,000 housing units. Comparing the
holding capacity to the projected Kalamazoo population, it is
apparent that the proposed residential land use will accommodate
potential growth through 1990. To ensure that all those who wish
to live within the Kalamazoo area are able to find adequate
space for their housing needs, the city plan promotes the adoption
of a Regional Housing Policy by all local governments within
the planning area of the Southcentral Michigan Planning Council.
Such a policy, if adopted, would speak to the issue of a more
equitable distribution of housing opportunities throughout
Kalamazoo's metropolitan area.

-Neighborhood Analysis

-- ----

The Residential Element documents the analysis of the city's
current residential zoning and land use patterns. This analysis
was conducted as a means of isolating current problems of
incompatible land uses and excessive residential densities. In
reviewing statistical descriptions of current neighborhood
conditions, it was found that portions of the Northside, Edison,
Central City, and Eastside neighborhoods contain deteriorated
housing. A mixture of residential, commercial, and industrial
land uses has prevented these areas from remaining viable
residential neighborhoods. Their proximity to the Central
Business District and established industrial zones demands that
portions of these neighborhoods be redeveloped and used for
more productive commercial or industrial purposes. Other
portions of these neighborhoods are suitable for residential use,
but require extensive residential rehabilitation and, to some
degree, redevelopment. To safeguard potential private/public
investment, many residential areas within these neighborhoods
must be rezoned from their current industrial designation to
recognize their residential character.
The residential land use analysis revealed further that many of the
older inner-city neighborhoods, among which Vine is a prime
example, suffer from problems caused by excessive residential
densities. In these areas, most of the street network includes

�Land Use Component

29

City of Kalamazoo
------

extensive patterns of narrow places and courts where singlefamily structures were developed with minimal yards. A high
degree of conversion to multiple units has also occurred in the
core area, causing greater transiency and serious incidents of
deterioration. These factors, coupled with more cars, have placed
an extraordinary strain on the inner city's residential environment.
While Kalamazoo is a residentially-mature city, there are still
some 1,754 acres of currently vacant land available for new-homes
construction. Recent trends have shifted housing preferences
from single-family dwellings to more economical multipledwelling units. This trend encourages land owners, especially
those along major thoroughfares, to develop their properties for
multiple-family use. Although many single-family neighborhoods
have felt the growing presence of new apartment construction,
the trend has been of particular importance in high demand areas
like those adjacent to Western Michigan University. Constructing
apartment complexes in close proximity or within well established
single-family neighborhoods can often adversely affect the
character, value, and viability of such neighborhoods when
good design standards are not followed.
Recommendations

It is the intent of the plan not to significantly change existing
area densities except where specifically designated for increases
due to new redevelopment. In developing areas the plan
proposes to protect surrounding or adjacent single-family
neighborhoods from the intrusion of large scale multiple dwelling
development. In both instances a simple density designation
would not fully represent the proposed action inherent within
the Comprehensive Plan.
The intensity designation for residential areas within the
Comprehensive Plan represents a relationship between existing
and/or proposed density, the characteristics of a given site
and its location in the anticipated community land-use pattern.
Intensity takes into consideration the relationship between any
given proposed development and the structural mass (building
bulk} and open space of surrounding or adjacent developed
property, as well as the Planning Commission's stated goals for
an individual neighborhood.
The proposed Residential Element of the Land Use Component
recommends that the amount of municipal land devoted to
residential use be expanded from its current 38.8 percent to 47.0
percent once the plan is fully implemented. Most expansion will
result from the residential development of the vacant land,
noted above. A majority of all currently vacant land is located in
residential areas which are predominately single family in
character. Residents of these areas have expressed their concern
at public meetings and through other channels of communication
that the character of their neighborhoods may be impaired if

�I

Land Use Component

30

Comprehensive Plan
apartment complexes and other similar high intensity residential
uses continue to be constructed within their boundaries. Because
market trends indicate that multiple dwelling units will continue
to be in high demand in coming years, their development cannot
and should not be limited. To minimize their impact on existing
single-family neighborhoods, the plan encourages the
development of residential areas which provide land use mixtures
on a planned basis. This allows construction of a full range of
activities and housing types within single-family neighborhoods
(including mid-rise apartments of three to six stories), but reduces
the possible deleterious effects by ensuring low overall
residential intensity.
To assist the city in improving the quality of life within its
existing residential neighborhoods, the plan recommends
utilization of a number of implementation techniques. Foremost
among such strategies are those that stimulate neighborhood
preservation, stabilization, rehabilitation, and/ or redevelopment.
Neighborhood deterioration results from the interaction of
numerous complex socio-economic variables. The Housing
Element, which is summarized in the following discussion,
analyzed Kalamazoo's housing market in terms of local supply
and demand. Certain attributes of each were found to be
responsible for causing, at least in part, the deterioration of many
older, inner-city neighborhoods. Strategies include the rezoning
of land where incompatible land uses currently exist, and
amending the city's zoning ordinance to ensure reasonable
neighborhood densities.
Housing Element

In 1949, Congress declared that every American family should
have a "decent home." Since then, numerous federal programs
have been designed and implemented to meet this elusive goal.
This element of the Comprehensive Plan was written in
compliance with current federal requirements to evaluate the
condition of Kalamazoo's existing housing stock, to analyze the
current and projected housing needs of area residents, and to
establish policy in light of community goals for the preservation,
renewal, and expansion of the existing housing supply. The intent
of this study is to promote the betterment of Kalamazoo's
residential environment through the reduction or elimination
of identified problems and the adoption of realistic planning
policies to guide the responsible development of future
residential areas.

Scope

To determine whether Kalamazoo's housing supply is currently
meeting the needs of area residents and to determine the
likelihood of its meeting community needs in the future, an
analysis of housing supply-and-demand characteristics was
performed. Included in the analysis were supply statistics
descriptive of present housing quantity, quality, type, age,
density, value, cost, occupancy, and tenure. These statistics,

�Land Use Component

31

City of Kalamazoo
which were presented on a census-tract basis, were related to
the socio-economic characteristics of area residents (see Figure 2
for a map of census tract boundaries).
The findings from this analysis suggest that the city suffers from
three distinct but interrelated problems. The first stems from the
fact that area developers are unable to construct low-cost
housing profitably within the City of Kalamazoo. In recent years,
newly constructed single-family homes have been typically
constructed for sale in a median price range of $35-40,000, while
the median rent in large, privately-built apartment complexes
ranges from $192 to $294. Household income statistics suggest
that while Kalamazoo's relatively affluent families can afford
such costs, many others are simply priced out of the
new housing market.
The second problem, the concentration of low-income and
minority groups within the city's older inner-city neighborhoods,
results in part from the first. Because competitively-priced homes
are difficult to locate in Kalamazoo's newer residential areas,
many low-income families are forced to buy or rent homes in the
city's older, less expensive neighborhoods, particularly those
adjacent to the Central Business District (see Table 4 for the
distribution of median income by census tract).
Stuart, Douglas, Central City, and the Northside neighborhoods
have become less attractive in terms of home ownership since
1960 and, as a result, have experienced an increase in the
number of neighborhood rental units. Large single-family homes
have, in addition, been converted to accommodate high student
demand for rental properties within these areas. These
conversions have caused problems of excessive residential
densities, increased traffic, front-yard parking, inordinate
amounts of trash, and a noticeable lack of home maintenance.
The physical deterioration of Kalamazoo's current housing
supply is considered the city's third major housing problem
(see Figure 3). While 4.2 percent of all housing units within the
city were declared deficient to some degree in 1975, parts of the
Northside, Central City, Edison, and Vine neighborhoods had,
in the same year, housing deficiencies in excess of 10 percent.
While age and, in some instances, soil construction are factors
responsible for physical deterioration in many of the city's older
neighborhoods, such deterioration has been accelerated by the
financial inability of home owners to provide or renters to induce
the provision of proper home maintenance.
The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan also includes a
discussion of the results of 19 neighborhood meetings conducted
earlier this year. Citizens at these meetings, in describing current
neighborhood conditions, reinforced the findings of the statistical
analysis performed in isolating the stated problems. Physical

�-

a
Land Use Component

32

Comprehensive Plan
deterioration, tenant abuse, landlord neglect, the conversion of
single-family homes, and the problems related to excessive
residential densities were cited most frequently by residents of
inner-city neighborhoods as being prime detriments to the
quality of life within these areas. Citizen complaints from many
of the city's newer outlying neighborhoods emphasized the lack
of capital improvements like sidewalks, street lighting, and
curbs/gutters rather than the quality or condition of housing
within their neighborhoods.
Recommendations

It is recommended that Kalamazoo approach the solution to the
city's current housing problems in three ways. First, the city must
adopt and utilize techniques which will promote the preservation
of currently sound residential areas and encourage the
rehabilitation of those displaying signs of physical deterioration.
The Community Development Department has recently completed
a comprehensive study of the city's code-enforcement program.
Improved procedures should permit the employment of a new
and intensive code-enforcement program as a primary means of
attaining neighborhood preservation, stabilization, and
rehabilitation. This approach, by requiring individual
homeowners and landlords to maintain their properties to
specified standards, should improve the quality of Kalamazoo's
residential environment but, at the same time, require the city to
expend few public funds. A loans-and-grants program m1;1st,
however, be coupled with an approach to reduce the cost burden
for low-income families. Without such a program, many families
will simply be unable to afford the repairs necessary to bring
their homes up to the standards specified within the city's
building code. Such a program must be a cooperative effort
between the public and private sectors.
A second strategy recommends the expansion of the city's total
housing supply. Kalamazoo can achieve an expansion of its
housing supply through the vigorous use and promotion of
federal programs and agreements with financial institutions
intended for this purpose, and the development of a cooperative
agreement between the city and the private housing industry.
By encouraging an increase in the number of available housing
units, the city would ensure greater opportunity for all citizens
to locate in units of preferred quality, cost, type, and style.
An abundance of available housing units would, in addition,
permit the removal of substandard units, encourage more
competitive pricing practices within the market, and promote
an overall upgrading of the city's housing stock.
A third recommended public strategy suggests the expanded use
of federally-funded rent subsidy programs. By providing rent
subsidies to low-income residents, the city would encourage
landlords to improve the quality of their rental properties as they

�Land Use Component

33

City of Kalamazoo
-----------------compete for the expanded resources of low-income families.
This should not only induce the rehabilitation of deteriorated
rental units and promote continued maintenance, but should
also permit low-income families to choose more freely
the location of their homes.
Commercial Element

In the last several decades, the number and nature of commercial
establishments within Kalamazoo has increased and changed
dramatically. The most significant change in commercial
development has been the growth of three regional shopping
centers outside the city's corporate limits. The emergence of
these regional centers, in raising the level of competition for the
consumer dollar, has adversely affected many of Kalamazoo's
older and perhaps less efficient commercial areas. The
Commercial Element of the Land Use Component analyzes
Kalamazoo's numerous commercial districts in order to assess
their present viability and to determine their probable future need.
The major purpose of this element is to target land for future
commercial activity and to recommend policies to guide and
strengthen Kalamazoo's broad commercial base.

Scope

To determine Kalamazoo's present and future commercial needs,
an analysis was made of present commercially zoned land,
current commercial land use, the absorption of land into
commercial use, and business turnover and vacancy rates.
Kalamazoo has twenty-eight major/minor shopping areas
excluding the Central Business District (CBD). The following
is a discussion of these areas. A summary of the CBD analysis
is presented separately.
A comparison of Kalamazoo's commercial land use distribution
with national standards revealed that, for a city of its size,
Kalamazoo has much more land zoned for commercial purposes
than is thought necessary by good design practice. Over 70%
of the 441 acres currently in commercial use are located in
unplanned commercial areas, a majority of which are classified
as strip-commercial developments. Despite an overabundance
of land zoned for commercial purposes, Kalamazoo's need for
neighborhood shopping centers has not been met. (see Table 5).
Large amounts of unplanned commercial land use causes
inefficiencies and problems such as increased traffic and
traffic accidents, unnecessary air and noise pollution, and a
wasteful use of valuable energy and land resources. While
absorption rates indicate that much of the city's commercially
zoned land could be absorbed into commercial usage over the
next twenty years, business turnover and vacancy rates suggest
that many existing commercial areas are already unstable and in
need of revitalization. Allowing commercial activity to increase
without renewing or redesigning older commercial areas will
serve only to reinforce growing commercial decay.

�I

-

Land Use Component

34

Comprehensive Plan
An important part of the Commercial Element included an
analysis of the city's twenty-eight major/minor shopping areas
to permit the isolation of problems specific to each. In reviewing
the full range of existing problems, it was found that five
techniques, used either alone or in combination, may prove
to be effective in ameliorating, if not solving, problems currently
found or anticipated in commercial areas. These techniques and
their definitions are as follows:
1 Zoning Reassessment/where existing commercial zones are
not being used
2 Consolidation/where stable commercial areas should have
easier access and better service
3 Aesthetic Planning/where use of green spaces would enhance
commercial areas
4 Improvement of auto/ pedestrian traffic/where access for cars
and pedestrians is improved
5 Preservation/where the area in question needs little or no
change
Figure 4 displays the location of the twenty-eight areas analyzed,
while Table 6 indicates the alternate techniques suggested for
use in each.
Recommendations

It is recommended that the amount of land zoned for commercial
use be reduced in accordance with current/projected community
and neighborhood needs. Future commercial expansion should
be permitted to occur only in those areas proved viable or
targeted within the Comprehensive Plan, and the Central Business
District should be maintained as the principal commercial center
in Kalamazoo. Commercial land uses which have been found to
be of marginal value and which shows little potential for
rehabilitation should be designated as non compatible land uses
and ultimately removed. Unplanned commercial sites which are
scattered throughout neighborhoods should be allowed to remain
only if they provide substantial service to neighborhood or
community shoppers. It is recommended that such unplanned
but viable commercial areas be used as a basis for future
commercial development within an area and that such areas be
redeveloped to meet the standard definition of neighborhood
or community shopping areas.
Many problems between existing commercial development and
surrounding residential areas stem from poor site-planning
and/ or design. The adoption of workable design standards and
criteria to ensure the proper development of future commercial
sites and the potential redevelopment of existing areas is
recommended. In redevelopment of existing areas, private

�Land Use Component

35

City of Kalamazoo
individuals will be encouraged to enhance the beauty and use of
their commercial properties by incorporating such features as
common parking areas, improved circulation patterns, and
landscaping, including signs, utility lines, and service areas,
to buffer adjacent areas from possible adverse effects.
In order to incorporate necessary flexibility within the plan and to
meet community needs, it is also recommended that commercial
development be allowed within multi-use developments in areas
located on major arterials or adjacent to existi g stable
commercial centers.
The plan views the City Market as an asset to Kalamazoo and
recommends that such a facility be maintained.
Central Business District

Before World War II, Kalamazoo's Central Business District (CBD)
served as the sole regional shopping center for the metropolitan
area. In the last decade, however, three additional regional
shopping centers have emerged: Maple Hill, West Main, and
Southland. These enclosed malls, which are outside the city's
corporate limits, have significantly raised the level of competition
for the consumer dollar. Kalamazoo's downtown mall has, in
recent years, lost its place as the number one retail area.
The Maple Hill and West Main Malls, according to the 1972 Census
of Business, had the highest sales volume of any commercial
district in the metropolitan area. A consumer market survey has
shown further that the Maple Hill and West Main Malls are
preferred by nearly one-half of all shoppers within the City of
Kalamazoo. Despite this shift in area-wide shopping preferences,
Kalamazoo's Central Business District continues to play a crucial
role in the city's economic life. The following statistics suggest
its importance. While the CBD accounts for only 1.1 % of the city's
total land area, it generates 6.4% of the total tax revenue for the
city and the school system. It also generates no less than 10% of
Kalamazoo's sales revenue and perhaps up to 25% of its total
yearly receipts (approximately $154.1 million in 1972, according
to the Upjohn Institute). Currently a fourth regional shopping
center is being planned south of Southland Mall in Portage.
The development of another commercial center within
Kalamazoo's market area will undoubtedly impact both the
existing enclosed regional malls and the CBD. When this fact is
coupled with area market and population projections, the
possibility of the Central Business District's maintaining its
current sales levels seems remote unless steps are taken to
bolster its market position.

Scope

It is vital to Kalamazoo's local economy that the CBD remain
healthy. The development of new commercial areas within the
CBD may prove to be the greatest stimulus for continued
economic growth and viability in the Kalamazoo area. Figure 5
indicates that portion of the CBD which has been suggested as a
potential area for new commercial development and/ or

�I

-

a
Land Use Component

Comprehensive Plan
redevelopment. Analyses showed several other existing factors
which could potentially influence the direction of growth within
the CBD. These include specifically housing, parking and the
rail/highway conflict.
Housing

The construction of quality residential units within the CBD could
help not only to stabilize existing fringe residential areas, but
could also provide an excellent clientele for downtown
merchants. Currently, as the following statistics indicate,
residential uses make up only 2.5% of the total uses in the CBD.
This figure would be considerably less if the fringe CBD blocks
on the western and southern edge of the Central Business District
were to be excluded.

Square Footage by Use in CBD
CBD

Square Footage

Net Retail*

1,470,119

18.8%

Net Service*

584,238

7.5%

Net Office*

660,812

8.4%

Manufacturing

287,982

3.7%

Vacant Space

240,178

3.1%

Storage

959,027

12.2%

Public

446,418

5.7%

Residential
-------Parking

192,400

2.5%

1,002,149

12.8%

619,000

7.8%

1,076,288

13.7%

298,059

3.8%

-----

Bronson Hospital

----- ----Upjohn Co.
Vacant Lots
Total

7,836,670 sq. ft.

% ofTotal

100.0%

* Less area devoted to storage or vacant space.

As part of the study to determine the potential for new CBD
housing, the Community Development Department analyzed the
existing condition, location, and types of residential structures
within the CBD. The analysis revealed the existence of four major
categories of housing types. (See Figure 6 for their location)
1 Single-family and conversions ( converted from single-family
homes to two or more)
2 Older multiples (3 or more units)
3 Older hotels (institutional and group quarters)
4 Modern hotel-motels.

36

�Land Use Component

37

City of Kalamazoo

- - -- - - - -

Generally, it was found that the structure and/or site conditions
of all housing within the CBD is in need of major improvements
both to bring it up to code and to provide residents with a quality
residential environment.
A consumer market survey conducted by the Community
Development Department revealed that certain socio-economic
groups would be interested in locating their homes within the CBD
if quality housing units were available. Many of those interested
work in the downtown area. By socio-economic group, those who
fall into the professional/managerial level and those who are in
the retired and low-income classification make up the bulk of
those who would consider living downtown. In terms of structural
type, new townhouse developments were stated most frequently
as preferred by upper and middle-income groups. Among
potential low-income CBD dwellers, apartment living was the
preferred choice. Through conversations with people interested
in downtown housing, it became clear that many of these people
see Kalamazoo's Central Business District as offering many civic
and cultural advantages.
Indeed, the CBD has an excellent concentration and variety of very
desirable amenities that are not available in other residential
areas of the city. Social and cultural institutions, such as
churches, library, museum, and art center with their varied
activities and displays are easily accessible. Entertainment and
recreational activities exist in the form of theaters, night clubs,
restaurants, convention centers and movie theaters. Public parks
and tree-lined streets exist for passive activities. Health facilities,
police and fire protection are provided within blocks of any area
of the CBD. Shops providing items for any need are located along
the Kalamazoo Mall or the CBD's many commercial streets.
(See Figure 7)
Parking

While the construction of additional housing within the CBD may
bolster the economic expansion of Kalamazoo's downtown area,
the lack of sufficient parking may act to inhibit such growth.
Because Kalamazoo's main retail competition, the enclosed
regional malls, provide free parking, it is imperative that sufficient
parking spaces be made available within the CBD. The cost of
such spaces may discourage a few potential shoppers from the
onset, but their inability to find convenient parking spaces on a
regular basis may, in the long run, be much more damaging. A lack
of some 965 parking spaces within the South Mall area already
exists while a lack of 177 spaces potentially exists in the North
Mall area, as soon as the Kalamazoo Center and other North Mall
structures become fully occupied. Future needs tor additional
parking within the Mall area could also be affected by such
potential developments as a new County Building, expansion of
businesses on the Mall or a large scale project constructed on one
of the several city-owned lots. Consideration should be given to

�Land Use Component

38

Comprehensive Plan
the construction of other parking ramps so as to provide needed
parking spaces without using large areas of prime space within
theCBD.
-------

Rail/Highway Conflict

Another factor which may influence the economic growth of the
CBD is a problem known as the rail/highway conflict, most visible
when trains block intersections. The ConRail main classification
yard is located immediately east of Kalamazoo's downtown area.
Local movements are arranged in accordance with the production
schedules of local industry. Since these schedules fluctuate,
movements can occur during peak hour auto traffic. The problem
becomes intensified as a result of two additional factors: 1) the
tracks which are in poor condition are constructed with a curve
which slows rail movements, and 2) backing movements are
frequently necessary to get a train onto its destination track.
A single train may block major arterial streets two and three times
before leaving the city for its final destination. {Please refer to the
Railroad summary in the Transportation Component for a more
complete review of this problem.) Although Kalamazoo residents
have lived with the rail/highway conflict for many years, the long
term continued economic vitality of the city's CBD may, to some
extent, depend upon its immediate solution. As competition for
the consumer dollar increases, it becomes more important to
provide a shopping environment which is free from both hassle
and unnecessary delay in arrival and departure.

Recommendation

The plan recommends that the CBD be reinforced as the city's
major commercial center. To this end, specific consideration has
been given to commercial and residential development, parking
and traffic circulation.
In order to maintain the CB D's vitality it is recommended that
increased commercial development be encouraged in a controlled
form that allows for multiple uses such as retail, office, and
residential functions.
Any CBD residential development is viewed as desirable for it will
supply an additional market for downtown merchants and stabilize
the area's tax base. New housing in this area could replace
deteriorating structures and create open space through the
functional design of apartment buildings with proper site
consideration. It is recommended that new housing should
preserve existing residential scale, street trees, and limit nonresidential blight.
The location of future housing in the Central Business District is
recommended in five special areas as shown in Figure 8. The
number of each area indicates priority with one, being the most
desirable and five, the least. Housing development is recommended
to be limited north of Michigan Avenue in the CBD because of
nonresidential character of the area and lack of sufficient

�Land Use Component

39

City of Kalamazoo

-------

amenities. Area Vis seen as a housing rehabilitation or new midrise area.
Area IV was selected because of its proximity to the Central
Business District and the availability of a possible site where there
are large expanses of surface parking lots. A large site could be
developed to provide open space not currently provided. Housing
types seen in this area are mid-rise with possible high-rise.
Areas Ill and II are seen as mid-rise apartment developments to
match the mid-rise character of surrounding buildings. The sites
are located close to all amenities. Urban open space fringes the
area with Bronson Park and the Kalamazoo Mall. These sites are
currently vacant or used for parking and are located close to
major downtown employers.
With respect to parking, it is recommended that serious
consideration be given to several strategies that would free
spaces for retail customers in the CBD. It is recommended that the
potential need for parking be met with the construction of parking
structures in both the north and south mall areas. Because the
city-owned lots take up such a large area in the CBD, it is
recommended that some means for landscaping these areas be
found to enhance the central environment of the CBD. Please
refer to the Railroad summary within the Transportation
Component for a comprehensive review of these
recommendations.

lfff

l--

1H 1

Industrial Element

It is also recommended that traffic flow to the CBD from the south
be improved through the operational improvements on Burdick.
These improvements would be linked to the proposed circulation
pattern within the CBD and the proposed parking structure on the
South Mall.
The industrial goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to encourage
maximum industrial development in the city to supply employment
for its residents. Proposed implementation techniques will ensure
an improved industrial base without detrimental effects on the
environment or the character of adjacent neighborhoods.
Based on national land-use standards provided by urban design
criteria and an analysis of current industrial land use and zoning
within Kalamazoo, the city has an extensive amount of land zoned
for industrial purposes.
Two reasons account for such extensive industrial zoning: first,
Kalamazoo zoned an inordinate amount of land along the river for
the anticipated growth of the paper industry. Second, in the late
1950's, as industrially zoned land was annexed, no reassessment
was made of Kalamazoo's industrial districts. In addition,
considerable industrial development has occurred outside the
city, due to lower land costs and increased use of private auto.

�Land Use Component

40

Comprehensive Plan
Scope

While the city has 3,896 acres of industrially zoned land, only 862
acres are actually utilized for industrial purposes. The city's
absorption of industrially zoned land into industrial use has been
relatively low over the last five years. This and other trends
suggest that industrial growth within Kalamazoo will continue to
be slow in coming years and will, perhaps, never require the
amount of land currently zoned for industrial purposes.
Large portions of Kalamazoo's industrially zoned land are either
vacant or being used for nonindustrial purposes. This situation is
due primarily to the industrial zoning of residential areas near the
river and the use of industrially zoned land for commercial
development.
To determine which industrial areas are most viable and which
therefore, should be eligible for retention as industrial zones, an
analysis was conducted in which the city was divided into four
separate districts: A, B, C, and D. The boundaries of District A
correspond to those of the Eastside neighborhood. District B
includes the northern portions of the Central City and Edison
neighborhoods and the eastern portion of the Northside
neighborhood. District C includes the Milwood neighborhood in
its entirety, the southern portion of the Edison neighborhood, and
eastern portions of the Parkwood and South Westnedge
neighborhoods. District D includes all of the Stuart and the
western half of the Northside neighborhoods. Each district was
compared in terms of the number of industrial building permits
issued for the district in the last seven years, the dollar value of
the permits and the ability of the districts to attract and retain
industry. The latter test of viability was measured by subtracting
the number of industries which ceased to function within the
district from the number which relocated from outside the city
into the district.
Using the above stated criteria, it was found that districts A and
Dare nonviable industrial-growth areas. Both these districts
account for only 9.3 percent of the total number of industrial
permits issued for the entire seven-year study period. The value
of the developments within these districts, when compared to the
values of districts B and C, was found to be insignificant. District
A was unable to attract any new development during the study
period with an assessment greater than $100,000, while District D
lost two of the seventeen industries which have left Kalamazoo
since 1950.

It was discovered that several areas within or adjacent to District
B require as well as merit industrial redevelopment (See Figure 10).
Redevelopment advantages which are currently in effect within
these areas include the availability of wastewater and rail
facilities at all locations, recently improved streets in some
locations, relatively close proximity to the Central Business

�Land Use Component

41

City of Kalamazoo
District, and many sound, multi-storied structures which, although
currently in disrepair, could provide suitable quarters for many
types of industries when properly rehabilitated. Potential
advantages which could encourage redevelopment within these
areas include improved north-south access via the relocation and
improvement of the U.S. 131 Business Route, the potential transfer
of gas allocations from abandoned facilities to those targeted for
redevelopment, and the solution to the rail/highway conflict.
A factor which may inhibit the redevelopment of these areas is the
expense and difficulty of aggregating contiguous parcels of land.
Most industries, today, require large amounts of floor space on a
single level to accommodate large-scale, continuous-flow
production techniques. Conflicting uses of land, such as industrial
and residential, are freely intermixed throughout the suggested
redevelopment areas. Numerous small residential lots and many
well maintained residences intensify the dual problems of costs
and aggregation.
Further analysis indicated that District C contains some of the
city's largest sites currently zoned for industrial development.
These sites are presently being subdivided into smaller lots for
such purposes. Because District B already contains sites ideal for
small industrial plants, the city should adopt policies to encourage
smaller industries presently locating in District C to choose,
instead, sites within District B. Such policies will promote the
redevelopment of District B while leaving larger sites within
District C free for larger industrial development.
Recommendations

It is recommended that industrial areas being used for other than
industrial purposes be rezoned according to their predominant
use. The creation of a wholesale district is recommended with the
industrial portion of the Edison neighborhood where commercial/
service uses predominate. Residential areas within industrial
districts should, likewise, be rezoned in accordance with projected
needs for and absorption of industrial land. In addition, open
access between the Central Business District and the Northside
is proposed within the light industrial redevelopment area north
of the Metro Transit Facility.
The Comprehensive Plan proposes 2,021.27 acres of industrial
land use, removing large areas of land currently being utilized for
other purposes, and allowing 1,008.46 acres for future industrial
development. This provides the city with opportunity to eliminate
the downgrading of viable residential or commercial areas
previously targeted for industrial development while maintaining
Kalamazoo's ability to attract new industry.
The industrial plan will ensure the availability of all water and
sewer in industrial areas, and an improved overall transportation
system including rail, highway, and air service. It also recommends

�I

Land Use Component

42

Comprehensive Plan
the curtailing of nonindustrial development in industrial districts
to reserve available large vacant parcels for industrial use. Special
emphasis is given to development of abandoned and deteriorated
industrial sites through the proposed programs to aid in the
consolidation of property, including acquisition and demolition of
dilapidated structures to preserve existing industrial areas.
To implement these strategies, the city will have to take an
aggressive role in stimulating industrial development through
continued use of financial incentives and the county's overall
economic development authority. Encouraging retraining
programs to ensure an appropriately skilled labor supply will also
help to attract new industry to the area.
Open Space Element

The Comprehensive Plan recognizes open space as an essential
land use. Open space provides city residents with fresh air,
sunlight, and an opportunity for physical exercise. It is the intent
of the open space plan to preserve unique areas of natural interest
and improve overall landscaping to create a more positive
environment for the residents of Kalamazoo. This will be
accomplished through the proper expansion of recreational
programs and careful maintenance and growth of the city's open
space and park system.
Kalamazoo presents a unique opportunity to create a quality
urban environment. The city is well endowed with natural physical
beauty preserved in park land, tree-lined streets, rivers, and lakes.
Attempts to preserve and enhance these qualities have resulted in
the creation of Crosstown Parkway, the improved water quality
of the Kalamazoo River, Kleinstuck Preserve, and the Asylum
Lake area.

Scope

In preparing an outline for its Master Plan, the Department of
Parks and Recreation extensively inventoried park land and
facilities throughout the city. Included within the outline were
standards and criteria used in classifying future recreational needs
both on a city-wide and a neighborhood basis. Apparent
deficiencies were noted and plans for their correction suggested.
The findings and recommendations of the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan have been incorporated, in their entirety into this
document. These include the priorities for acquisition of property
for recreational use in Westwood, Oakwood, and Arcadia
neighborhoods. Specific additions to the inventory include a
proposed entryway beautification program and a system of
recreational trails (see Figures 11 and 12).

Recommendations

Building on this sound base, the open space plan emphasizes
significant physical improvements in deficient residential areas.
It also recommends continued preservation and improvement of
the total visual appearance of Kalamazoo.

�Land Use Component

43

City of Kalamazoo
Assessment of deficient residential areas on the Northside, Edison,
Central City, and Eastside have resulted in strategies to reduce
the adverse effects of improper land use development.
Commercial and industrial site design, reduction of large-scale
signs and large, open, paved parking areas are seen as means to
promote an improved visual environment.
In addition to enhancing the general environment of Kalamazoo
the open space plan proposes increased park land on a
neighborhood basis through redevelopment and rehabilitation of
existing park and school sites. Necessary acquisition would be
minimal and developed on a strict priority basis. Extensive streettree planting programs and entryway beautification projects are
recommended. These would be carried out in conjunction with the
transportation plan. Landscaping along major arterials would not
only provide aesthetic entrances to Kalamazoo but would also
buffer residential areas, screen industrial uses, and add harmony
to strip-commercial areas.
Utilizing the Kalamazoo River, its tributary creeks, lakes, and
marshes as active and passive recreational focal points, a system
of recreational trails has been proposed. By linking existing park
areas, vacant city-owned property and institutional lands with
these natural amenities, neighborhood access would be provided
throughout the city's total park system. An opportunity to walk or
bike to recreational activities or scenic areas would be provided
to all residents of the community.

I&amp;

Preservation of Kalamazoo's areas of unique environmental value
such as the city's water bodies- its lakes, creeks, ponds, and
river; its water recharge areas; Kleinstuck Preserve and the Hull
Estate constitutes a primary emphasis of the Comprehensive Plan.

Flood Plain Element

The floodplain located within the City of Kalamazoo is comprised
of the Kalamazoo River and its tributaries- Portage and Axtell
Creeks and the land adjacent to their channels (Figure 13).
Approximately 708 acres or 4.5% of the city's total acreage is in
the floodplain with the greatest amount of land and the highest
intensity of development in the Crosstown Parkway area. The
intent of the Floodplain Component of the Comprehensive Plan
is to examine the intensity of development within the floodplain
and to recommend policies to regulate land use therein.

Scope

The floodplain is divided into the floodway and flood fringe areas.
The floodway is a high flood-hazard area and generally there is
very little development there. The flood fringe contains 439 or
91.5% of the 480 structures in the floodplain with land uses
diversified among residential, commercial, industrial, and vacant
land uses. Residential uses number 216 or 45% of all structures
in the floodplain with 99 structures utilized for industrial purposes.
Several industrial structures are located in the floodway.

�I

I

Land Use Component

44

Comprehensive Plan
Recommendations

In order for a community to qualify for the National Flood
Insurance Program, the Community must commit itself to floodplain management which protects new construction from future
flooding. Floodplain management is an overall program of
corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood damage
including emergency preparedness plans and regulations such as
portions of zoning, subdivision, building, or floodplain ordinances.
Zoning is the most widely used tool to regulate land use within
floodplains. It is recommended that the city utilize performance
standards for permitted uses in the flood fringe and floodway.
Such zoning techniques would insure judicious use of the land
compatible with the overall goal of minimizing potential flood
damage.

Fiscal Impact
Scope

To assist in selecting the most economically viable Land Use
Component, cumulative fiscal impact relationships of proposed
new development and redevelopment areas in the city of
Kalamazoo were analyzed. All land use alternatives were
examined in terms of public expenditure and revenue impact
upon city finances.
Figures 14 and 15 show the five areas studied in the cost-revenue
analysis. Two alternatives were analyzed for each area, with the
existing development pattern compared to the pattern outlined
in the Land Use Component for the four redevelopment areas
located in central city neighborhoods.
The four redevelopment areas identified in Figure 14 are
described as follows:
1 The eastern portion of the Northside neighborhood comprising
54 acres of mixed uses proposed for industrial redevelopment;
2 A 13-acre site of commercial and industrial uses within the
Central Business District, proposed for commercial development;
3 A 66-acre site of commercial and residential uses in the Vine and
Central City neighborhoods, proposed for medium and highdensity ·residential redevelopment; and
4 A 154-acre site of mixed uses in the Edison neighborhood,
proposed for commercial-wholesale redevelopment.
Tables 7 and 8 summarize the annual fiscal relationships for the
four redevelopment areas, with Alternative A representing
existing conditions, and Alternative B representing the desired
end results.

�Land Use Component

45

City of Kalamazoo
Alternative A represents potential development at an intermediate
density and larger population: Alternative B represents the
density targeted in the Land Use Component and emphasizes
predominantly low-density development. Tables 9 and 10 outline
projected fiscal relationships for the area targeted for new
residential development.
Recommendations

The five proposed alternatives outlined in the Land Use
Component would result in a projected annual surplus balance
of $374,105, delineated as follows:
$329,405 Central city redevelopment areas
44,700 New residential development area
$374,105 Total
When implemented, the four Central City redevelopment proposals
targeted in the Land Use Component are expected to produce a
net annual increase of $495,560, compared to public service costs
under existing conditions. At present, a 60 percent deficit exists
between projected city revenues and expenditures for these
areas. Under the redevelopment proposal, a surplus of $329,405
or 32 percent would accrue annually to the City of Kalamazoo.
In the residential area proposed for greatest growth in population
and service demands, the residential alternative emphasizing
low-density development is more cost effective than the
intermediate-density proposal. The $193,000 difference is in large
measure, however, due to the disparity in average assessed
valuation between single-family homes and townhouses or
apartment units.

It is recommended that the four Central City redevelopment
proposals and the low-density residential alternative fodhe
Arcadia-Knollwood-Westwood areas be implemented as
designated in the Land Use Map due to their projected cost
effectiveness for the City of Kalamazoo.

�Land Use Glossary

46

Comprehensive Plan
Census Tracts

small areas into which large cities and adjacent areas are divided
along neighborhood lines and for which detailed census data
are gathered.

Central Business District (CBD)

a major commercial and/or industrial sector located in or near
the geographic center of the city. Commonly referred to as
"downtown", the CBD usually contains retail stores, offices,
banks, and the seat of the city's government.

Code Enforcement

a program to insure that all structures within the city's corporate
limits are maintained to the minimum standards specified in
municipal building and housing codes. Owners of those in
violation must correct the defect within a given amount of time.

Density

the number of dwelling units per acre of land.

Flood Fringe

that portion of the floodplain beyond the limits of the floodway.

Floodplain

flood hazard areas within a community. Floodplains are composed
of floodway and flood fringe areas.

Floodway

unobstructed portion of the floodplain consisting of the stream
channel and overbank areas capable of conveying a selected
flood discharge.

Household

one or more persons who occupy a housing unit.

Housing Unit

a house, an apartment, a group of rooms, or a single room
occupied or intended for occupancy as separate living quarters.

Intensity

a relationship between existing and/or proposed density,
the characteristics of a given site and its location in the
anticipated community land-use pattern.

Industrial Absorption

the annual rate at which acreage of all new industrial construction
is added to the city's total of industrially used land.

Industrial Redevelopment

the process of aggregating or disaggregating existing industrial
land and restoring, modifying or clearing structures located
thereon for purposes of making it suitable for more productive
industrial use.

Land Use

the utilization of land for a specific purpose. The activity or
development characteristic of a given parcel of land.

Loans and Grants

a combination of public {federal, state or local) and/ or private
loan programs and outright grants to eligible homeowners to
upgrade the physical condition of their homes. Eligibility
restrictions may vary but primarily include the age and type of
structure and income levels.

--

- - - - - --

�Land Use Glossary

47

City of Kalamazoo
Median Income

the point which divides all income amounts into two equal groups.
One level being above the median and the other below.

Multi or Mixed Use Development

development that is predominantly residential but contains
limited commercial and/ or office uses if the area to be developed
is adjacent to an existing commercial center or along major
arterials.

Neighborhood Preservation

to maintain the current neighborhood condit on and to protect
it from any adverse intrusion such as external traffic flow or
incompatible developments.

Neighborhood Redevelopment

to develop areas in accordance with a recommended land use or
intensity of use which may be indicated by the zoning district.

Neighborhood Rehabilitation

to improve the present neighborhood condition through the
physical improvement of individual properties.

----

--

------------------Neighborhood Stabilization

to prevent environmental change; to maintain by the development
of programs which tend to restore, improve and monitor the
current condition without drastically changing the present
character of the neighborhood.

Rent Subsidy

a program to financially support eligible low-income renters by
paying a portion of their monthly rent out of private or public funds
through federal or state programs.

Section Eight,
Community Development Act

a new lower-income housing assistance program sponsored by
the federal government to replace some older programs of the
same nature.

Unplanned Commercial
Development

commercial areas that develop without regard to overall planning
of building location, design, parking, street entrances, etc.
Often, unplanned commercial development occurs in "strips"
along one or both sides of major streets or roads.

�-~ .......

...
Proposed office development at Rose and South Street.

�Land Use Component

49

City of Kalamazoo
Proposed Land Use
Figure 1

A

LArio

B

G

A

11
Legend

ABCD-

Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Commercial

EFG-

Industrial
Public Semi-Public
Parks Open Space
Central Business District/CBD

�Land Use Component

50

Comprehensive Plan
Census Tracts

Kalamazoo, Michigan December, 1976

Figure2

------------------------•-----TKalamazoo Twp Part

\

Pa,chrnea,

,
15.01

I

13

,

, .,....

'

,_,.
..

a:

I
I

L

Kalamazoo Twp Part

i

14.02

&lt;(

2

&lt;(
_J

,,

&lt;(

NORTH

I
I

5

4

15.05
18.03

HOWARD
w

11

10
ALCOTT

"'
w

0

...

LANE

"'w
;:

16.01

....
MILLER

CORK

w

0

z&lt;(

"'w
0

_____ _ ---, ..
16.02

_J

""
&lt;(

0

17.01

&lt;(

u.

18.01

WHITES

I

(I

u

INKSTER

12

PARKVIEW

----.4!..I

,.

a:
0

2

I

I

,--~✓

N

15.03

I
I
I
I

I I

, ;-'.. J

0
0

2

11

L_.,

... ~ \
3

14.01

.. ]

I

·4'-,

.--J

,_z

"';:

w

J ,,

&amp;i ...

-..
17.02

a:.
a:
u

"-

__
.,,.
.,, J '
,-,

I

....

18.02

I

I
I
I

r-.r-J
1,J1
11..1

I
l11:i., I
~ I
I I
II
L.1

�Land Use Component

51

City of Kalamazoo
Housing Deficiencies
Figure3

---------------------------Kalar,1azoo Twp Part

15.01

Kalamazoo Twp Part

14.02
15.03

15.02

.z

..I

C,

u.

'"'
RIVER

18.03

Deficient Structures
Per Block

0-2
3-4

5-6

7-8
-

9-10

-

11-12

Source: 1974 Parcel Survey Statistics, City of Kalamazoo

�52

Land Use Component

Comprehensive Plan
Area Retail Centers
Figure4

1 TwJ

toper Twp

Oshtemo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

--• --i I --l\

-.&amp;:-~----I
amo

I

Cooper Tw~Richland rwp
azoo Twp

Comstock Tw

I

I

-.. J---

I

I

1

I

----1-!--Oshtemo Twp
Texas Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I

Comstock Twp

I Pavilion Twp
---►--­

'
l!:'
I rI
., I

I Portage Twp

Portage Twp

I

I
I

\ I

A

w

l.1

Regional Shopping Centers
Community Shopping
Neighborhood Shopping
Spot Commercial Development

�Land Use Component

53

City-of
Kalamazoo
------- -- Potential Areas for Commercial Redevelopment within the CBD
Figure 5

Metro Transit
Bu1id1r1g Site

Inter modal
T1ansportation Center

111111111111

Commercial

�Land Use Component

54

Comprehensive Plan
-----------Existing Housing in the CBD
Figure 6

11111111111

Single Family- Conversions
Old Multiple
Old Hotel - 2nd Floor Apartments
Modern Hotel-Motel

Source: Planning Division, 1976

�Land Use Component

55

City of Kalamazoo

----

Amenities in the CBD
Figure 7

-

IIll 11111111
~

Public- Semi-Public
Cultural
Parks
Entertainment
Grocery- Drug -

Laundry

Source: Planning Division, 1976

�Land Use Component

56

Comprehensive Plan
Proposed Residential Development Areas Within the CBD
Figures

CBD

~h

Development Area

Source: Planning Division, 1976

�Land Use Component

57

City of Kalamazoo
New, Re-occupied and Abandoned Industrial Sites
Figure 9

Kalamazoo Twp Part

15.01

~-,.
..
~

... -,

PR'OUTv

Kalamazoo Twp Part

I
I

.....

2

3

...i

I

C
0

'~

er

NORlH

14.02

0

Cl

I
I

~-.l'LI

''--,.r.1

I
I
I
I

L.... .__ _-.
-,_

15.05

A,--1.-AK_l_ _•.o('

,..

I
11
uJ

Cl

....

16.01

12

"'"'s:

~

·•.!.

ALCOTT

fNKSTER

MILLER

■

18.01

WHITES

PARKVIFW

~

---

10

&lt;.,
0.

P. _00 RIVER
7

,s.03

llOWARO

0
uJ
7

KALP.~

CORK

I

I
(I

_____ _ ----,.16.02

17.01

.....

J ,,

17.02

18.02

-,

I

,-,

New Industrial Sites Since 1971
Sites Losing an Industry Since
1950 - Now Vacant and Abandoned

Source: Planning Division, 1976

I

.I

l J1:i.

Sites Losing - Then Gaining an Industry
Sites losing an IndustryThen Gaining Other Use

1,J1
IL.I

I
p

I
I

I
, .. r-J

--..,.

.,, J

I

,

I
\. I
I I
II
L..a

�Land Use Component

58

Comprehensive Plan
Areas Targeted for Industrial Redevelopment
Northern Industrial District B

Figure 10

/11111111111

Light Industry

~/h

Heavy Industry

December, 1976

�Land Use Component

59

---------------- ------ --- -- ---------

-

City of Kalamazoo
Entryway Greenspace Corridors

Figure 11

-L-~TwJI.... -amo

looper Twp

Oshtemo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

---~I ... Oshtemo Twp
Texas Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I Portage Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

1rr
I'
I

Comstock Twp

I Pavilion Twp
---►--­

Portage Twp

1
,.J

I
--------+-------tt----+---+--- -

I

.,

\ I

tJ

II
I

�Land Use Component

60

Comprehensive Plan
Recreational Trails
Figure 12

1 TwJtoper

I\

---r-1 i. I

-~-~... -amo

Oshtemo Twp

I

Cooper Tw~Richland Twp

Twp

zoo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I

Comstock Tw

I

I

---~-Oshtemo Twp
Texas Twp

I

...•
Kalamazoo Twp

K

I Portage Twp

1
,.I

r

1rr

I....._....,_--+---+----+--+------, II

.....
tll1l1fW

\ I

tJ

Separate Recreational Bike Hike Path
Improved Combination Bike Hike Path
Open Space- Parks -

I

Comstock Twp

-•-1!----•
Portage Twp I Pavilion Twp

Water Recharge Areas

II

I

�Land Use Component

61

---

City of Kalamazoo
Special Flood Hazard Area Map

Figure 13

100 Year Flood Plain

MOS[

AVE

131 B.l

NORTH
KA A

AZOO

"I,~
MILi t;,i

Wl-'IT

CORK

~

Q

w

2
I-

t/;

""u
6

a:
~
w

;;

CITY

\MTS

I

I

I

�Land Use Component

62

Comprehensive Plan
Possible Redevelopment Areas Tested for Cost-Revenue
Consequences

Figure 14

9'/A

1 Industrial

111111111111

2 Commercial
3 High-Density Residential
4 Wholesale-Warehouse

�Land Use Component

63

City of Kalamazoo
Possible Residential Development Area
Figure 15

Tested for Cost-Revenue Consequences

._

_______ _

..

�Land Use Component

65

City of Kalamazoo
Table 1

Comparison: Current Zoning and Land Use to
Proposed Land Use a

Proposed Land
Usec
(3)

Difference
(Column 3
less
Column 2)

6,095.22
4,214.28
1,222.91
658.03

7,464.75
5,528.67
1,333.24
602.84

1,369.53
1,314.39
110.33
-55.19

967.50
751.05
88.84
--- - - - - 127.61

850.73
596.53
163.46
90.74

-116.77
-154.52
74.62
-36.87

Current Zoning
(1)

10,631.68
Residential
Low Intensity
---------Medium Intensity
High Intensity
Commercial
Retail/Service
----Wholesale
Office
Industry
Light
Heavy

Current Land
Useb
(2)

1,276.58

3,896.33

1,012.81
2,021.27
-----219.43
708.73
-----793.38
1,312.54

----

1,226.39

Parks

1,908.50

1,008.46
489.30
519.16
862.11

a Expressed in acres.
b With the exception of Residential Land Use, does not include
Streets, Rail, Lakes and Streams.
c Generalized statistics.
Source: Planning Division 1976

Comparison: Current and Future Residential Land Use

Table2
Density

Current Acres

Percent of
Total

Proposed Acres

Percent of
Total

Low

4,214.28
1,222.91
658.03
6,095.22

69.1
20.1
10.8
100.0

5,528.67
1,333.24
602.84
7,464.75

74.1
17.8
8.1
100.0

Medium
High

TOTAL

Source: Table developed by the Community Development DepartmentPlanning Division (October, 1976)

�66

Land Use Component

Comprehensive Plan
Comparison: Future Population to Potential Housing Units
Table3

1

Vear

1970
1975
1980
1985
1990

2

3

4

5

6

Population a
within Households

Estimatedb
Persons
Per Household

Estimated Number
of Households

Number of
Housing Units

Difference
(Column 5 Less
Column4)

2.84
2.62
2.49
2.42
2.39

25,799
27,865
31,483
33,326
34,449

27,167C
28,640d

73,202
73,007

78,392
80,648
82,333

Table prepared by the
Planning Division, 1976

33,774e

33,774
33,774

1,368
775
2,291
448
-675

a Based on an averaging of population projections prepared by the Michigan
Department of State Highways and Transportation, Michigan Department of the
Budget and the W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. NOTE: Does
not include persons residing within group quarters.
b Based on statistics developed by the U.S. Census Bureau.
c As estimated for 1970 by the U.S. Census Bureau.
d Based on building and demolition statistics on file with the Community
Development Department, Building Division.
e Includes the 1975 housing unit count plus a potential of 5,134 additional units
as estimated through a "holding capacity" methodology (See the Residential
Land Use Element for discussion).

�Land Use Component

67

City of
Kalamazoo
Median Annual Income for Familiesa
Table4
1969

1959
--

Census Tract

1
2
3
4
5

Median

Percent of CityWide Median

5,673
4,081
5,505
4,906
6,265
5,613

89.1
64.1
86.4
77.0
98.4
88.1

5,195
4,945
6,212
5,976
11,579
7,074

81.6
77.6
97.5
93.8
181.9
111.1

6,167

96.8

7,066

111.0

7,497

117.7

6,555
7,899
6,365

102.9
124.1
100.0

Median

Percent of CityWide Median

Percent Change

87.5
52.1
8,626
-62.8
51.7
6,190
-42.1
79.3
7,822
-15.5
4,145
42.0
--- - ---33.1
8,336
84.6
- -78.7
38.2
7,759

~lb
8
9
10
11
12
14.01
15.04l
15.05

C

16.01
16.02

C

l

11.01 l
17.02

C

18.01
18.02
City-wide

Table prepared by the Planning Division,
Department of Community Development,
1976

a

7,932
8,135
9,217
9,022
16,678
10,615
6,671
11,163
18,087
9,879
12,966
10,481
11,254
12,312
9,852

~--

80.5
82.5
93.5
91.5
169.2
107.7
67.7
113.3
183.5
100.2
131.6
106.3
114.2
124.9
100.0

52.7
64.5
48.4
51.0
44.0
50.1

71.7
55.9
54.7

Selected Population, Housing and Economic Characteristics in Kalamazoo
County by Tracts: 1960-70. The W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment
Research March, 1973.
b The boundaries for census tract 7 correspond to those of the Kalamazoo
State Hospital.
c Tracts aggregated (15.04 and 15.05, 16.01 and 16.02, 17.01 and 17.02) to
illustrate a subdivision of tracts for 1970 census.

�Land Use Component

68

Comprehensive Plan
Comparison of National Standards to Kalamazoo's
Commercial Land Use

Tables

A Neighborhood Shopping
Center
(4 acres per 5,000)
1 5-20 stores within
neighborhood
2 neighborhood service/
convenience good
oriented
B Community Shopping Center
(10 acres per 10,000)
1 15-40 stores of wide range
of goods
2 accessible to several
neighborhoods
C Regional Shopping Center
(60 acres estimated)
1 30-60 stores
2 several major tenants with
many small shops

1

2

3

Standard Land
Use Allocation

Present Land Use

Amount Zoned

68Acres

21 Acres

399.45 Acres
(5, SA, SB)

87 Acres

73Acres

730.85 Acres
(Zone4)

60Acres

27.4Acres

146.28 Acres
(Zone 3)

--------------

0 Unplanned Commercial
Strip Commercial
Neighborhood service areas
Scattered site
Miscellaneous
*TOTAL

320.39 Acres
203
Acres
24
Acres
15
Acres
78.39 Acres

215 Acres

441. 79 Acres

1276.58 Acres

Table prepared by the Planning Division,
1 Standards taken from Planning Design Criteria
Community Development Department, 1976
Kalamazoo population is estimated 86,800 in 1976
2 Commercially-used land within commercial zones. An additional 525.71 acres
of commercially-used land is found in noncommercial zones. Lakes, streets, and
railroads are excluded from these figures.
3 Includes lakes, streets, and railroads.

�Land Use Component

69

City of Kalamazoo
Suggested Alternatives: Commercial
Table&amp;

1
Zoning
Reassess.

1 Portage-Lakeway-Milham
2 Corkland Shopping Center
3 Burdic~ South of Cork
4 S. Westnedge-Garland
to Liberty
5 Kilgore at S. Westnedge
- 6 Oakwood Plaza-Parkview
and Oakland
- 7 Parkview Hills Shops
8Stadium Dr.-DrakeRambling Road
9W. Michigan-Drake
to Lancaster
10 w--:-Michigan at Howard St.
11 W. Michigan at Burrows
12 Westwoocf Plaza Area
13 N. Westnedge-N-orth Side
14 Patterson at Burdick St.
15 Alamo-Douglas Intersection
1EiDouglas-North Street
17 1-94 at Sprinkle
18 Stadium Dr. at W. Main
19 Locust and Davis Areas
20 S. Westnedge-Vine Street
Village to Crosstown
Crosstown and Howard
21 Burdick - Walnut to Alcott
22 Portage -Vine to Bryant
23 Portage - Alcott to Miller
24 Riverview Dr. - Mosel to
Paterson
25 Riverview Dr. - South of
Gull Road
26 E. Main - Roosevelt
27 Miller Rd. - Commercial Areas
28 Mt. Olivet - Commercial Nodes
Source: Planning Division, 1976

X
X
X

2
Consolidation

3

4

5

Aesthetic Plan

Improve. of
Auto-Pedest.

Preservation

X
X
X
-

X
X

-

X
X

X

X

X
X
X
X
X

X

X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X

X

X

X

X

X

X
X
X
X

X

X
X

X
X

X
X
X

X

�Land Use Component

70

Comprehensive Plan
Summary of Annual Fiscal Impact Results for Redevelopment
Alternative A

Table7
Alternative A

1

2

3

Total

4

Redevelopment Area

Projected
Revenues
Projected
Expenditures
Annual Fiscal
Balance (Deficit)
Percent

$ 52,300

$20,020

$104,000

$101,200

$277,520

124,000

43,800

114,650

161,550

444,000

($ 71,700)
-137%

($23,780)
-119%

($ 10,650)
-10%

($ 60,~50)
-60%

($166,480)
-60%

Source : City of Kalamazoo Planning Division; Barton-Aschman Associates

Summary of Annual Fiscal Impact Results for Redevelopment
Alternative B

Tables

1

2

Total

3

4

$208,900

$190,400

$495,200

145,700
141,600
--- -- -

175,950

223,225

$ 14,450
8%

$271,975
55%

Redevelopment Area

Projected
Revenues
Projected
Expenditures
Annual Fiscal
Balance (Deficit)
Percent

$121,380

-

($ 24,320)
-20°/c_o __

$ 67,300
32%- -

---

-

$1,015,880
686,475

---

$ 329,405
32%

Source: City of Kalamazoo Planning Division; Barton-Aschman Associates

Table 9

Summary: Annual Fiscal Impact Results/New Growth Area
Alternative A

Projected Revenues
Projected Expenditures
Annual Fiscal Balance (Deficit)
Percent
-

$757,000
905,300
($148,300)
-20%
Source: City of Kalamazoo Planning Division; Barton-Aschman Associates

Summary: Annual Fiscal Impact Results/New Growth Area
Alternative B

Table 10
Projected Revenues
Projected Expenditures
Annual Fiscal Balance
Percent

-

$724,000
679,300
- f 44, 70=-c0c--- - 6%
Source: City of Kalamazoo Planning Division; Barton-Aschman Associates

���Transportation Component

75

City of Kalamazoo
The general goal of the Transportation Component is to develop
a safe and efficient transportation system that meets the demands
of the increased movement of people and goods in a way that has
minimal environmental impact. Utilizing a multi-modal approach
incorporating pedestrian, bike, private auto, bus, train, and air
transport, with emphasis on people rather than vehicular
movement, the plan is based upon energy conservation and
neighborhood preservation. The functional goals appearing in the
report provide direction for future decisionmaking on
transportation issues.
The Transportation Component is divided into four topics:
streets and highways, metro transit, railroads, and the airport.
Individual technical reports address past, present, and future
issues in each of the four topics. The research involved in these
analyses includes a working relationship with the Kalamazoo
Area Transportation Study (KATS) staff and various committees
working to complete a transportation plan for the urban area.
The city of Kalamazoo plan supports continued cooperation
with KATS.

Streets and Highways Element

Policy recommendations concerning thoroughfares are based
upon a limited new-construction approach: discouraging the
widening or building of roads when other improvement
alternatives are available. The typical major street plan outlines
its system based upon physical characteristics necessary to
accommodate expected traffic. The Transportation Component,
on the other hand, outlines a system based upon transporting
projected numbers of people, goods and services on existing
roadways.
To achieve the general goal of the Transportation Component,
the functional goal of the major street plan is twofold: 1) to
minimize the widening of existing streets within Kalamazoo,
except where operational improvements may require widening
at intersections; and 2) to limit the construction of new streets,
except where no other alternative will serve the needs of the
community.

Scope

The major street plan is based upon the analysis of statistical
data related to neighborhood concerns throughout the city. It is
evaluated in relationship to the Land Use Component of the
Comprehensive Plan in an attempt to reduce land-use/
transportation conflicts.
Mileage of Kalamazoo streets is illustrated on the next page.
This classification is defined by the Michigan Department of
State Highways and Transportation (MDSH&amp;T) in "Uniform
Criteria for Major Streets."

�Transportation Component

76

Comprehensive Plan
Type

Average
Right-ofWay

State Trunklines not
Maintained by City

200'

5.11

123.88

State Trunklines
Maintained by City

100'

11.97

145.09

Major and Local Streets

66'

249.08

1,992.64

Private Streets

20'

5.44

13.18

271.60

2,274.79

Total

Miles

Acres

Source : Public Works Department, City of Kalamazoo, June, 1976

Truck traffic within Kalamazoo is not restricted to particular
roadways. Although weight restrictions are posted on various
local streets, the city does not have designated truck routes.
Freight zones exist on various streets which prohibit loading and
unloading cargo during certain hours.
Statistics concerning existing roadway capacities and 1995
projected person trips are taken from the Kalamazoo Area
Transportation Study Deficiency Analysis issued by the MDSH&amp;T
in September, 1974. The KATS boundaries outline an area
somewhat less than the county limits. By applying mathematical
equations to future land use and socio-economic factors within
the KATS limits, future trip generation and distribution is
estimated. This approach accounts for the development of areas
outside of the city of Kalamazoo and their impact on the
Kalamazoo street network.
The Deficiency Analysis reports that while the northern portion of
the city of Kalamazoo generally shows enough capacity to handle
the 1995 demand, trip crossings in the southern portion,
specifically the north-south movement, show a significant
deficiency. The following example illustrates this point. Northsouth arterials (i.e. Oakland Drive, Westnedge Avenue, Burdick
Street, Lovers Lane, and Portage Street) have a current total
capacity of 97,500 person trips per day. However, 1995 projections
indicate that 132,500 person trips are to be expected to utilize
these five facilities. The 1995 residual deficiency is 35,000
person trips.
Other arterial streets in Kalamazoo exhibiting 1995 deficiencies
include West Main Street and portions of Drake Road, Stadium
Drive, Howard Street, Crosstown Parkway, Alcott Street, Mills
Street, Riverview Drive, Portage Street, and Douglas Avenue.

If nothing is done by 1995 to accommodate the 1995 traffic
projections, the level of service on deficient roadways will
deteriorate. Level of service standards assigned to particular
roadways reflect the quality of traffic flow. Such standards are
outlined below. Level of service "C" is used by the MDSH&amp;T in
evaluating 1995 Kalamazoo street deficiencies.

�Transportation Component

77

City of Kalamazoo

-- - -- - -

-- ---

Level of Service

Condition of Traffic Flow

A

Free flowing
Stable flow, medium to low density
Stable flow, ranging toward high density_
Approaching unstable flow _
Unstable flow, street at capacity
--'"'------Forced flow

B
C
D
E

F

Kalamazoo citizens have stated that they do not choose to widen
the roads within their neighborhoods to handle the projected
deficiencies caused by development outside the city limits.
However, if the Central Business District (CBD) is to remain
viable and continue to redevelop, some type of roadway
improvements are necessary to provide and maintain
accessibility to downtown. The following program approach
outlines the potential means to accomplish both objectives.
Recommendations

Better utilization of the current street network can be achieved
through the following strategies, which emphasize transporting
more people in fewer vehicles on existing roadways.
Traffic flow on arterial streets may be improved in several ways
other than street widening. Examples of operational improvements
include a detection system for timing signals, the removal of
onstreet parking, the prohibition of left-hand turns, allowance for
better transitioh between varying pavement widths for capacity
consistency, and contra-flow.
An increase in vehicle occupancy will accommodate future person
trips through such programs as car and van pooling. Cooperation
can be encouraged by implementing incentive parking programs
which reward those who commute with three or more persons
per car.
An increase in bus patronage is another means to handle
expected person trips through concepts such as park and ride,
limited demand-response, express buses, and the peripheral
spoke-pattern looping system.
Staggering work hours within major employment areas, for
example the CBD, is another approach to dealing with future
person-trip deficiencies. Approximately 10,000 people are
employed in the Kalamazoo CBD, or 20 percent of the total
number employed within the city limits. If CBD work trips can be
distributed over a longer peak hour, additional person-trip
deficiencies can be handled. If some eight-hour work days began
at 7:30 a.m. and others at 8:30 a.m., peak traffic would be spread
over more time.
An additional consideration is the physical and operational
improvement of Burdick Street, which is not shown as over
capacity in the 1995 projections. If, for example, some of the
90-degrees turns are improved, Howard Street is extended

�Transportation Component

78

Comprehensive Plan
eastward, and a better connection in the CBD is provided,
Burdick Street will attract more trips.
It is necessary to note, however, that any of these potential
techniques alone cannot solve the existing and future problems
of Kalamazoo roadways. A combination of these programs is
necessary for success. Not only policy determinations are
involved, but commitments from the local citizens of the
Kalamazoo area, as well.
It is also recommended that surveillance data concerning street
characteristics, i.e. capacities, signalization, traffic counts,
surface condition, etc., be collected and monitored for the entire
network. This information should assist city staff in the solution of a
number of traffic management problems including the designation
of intra-city truck routes to remove unnecessary through trips
from residential streets. In addition, an ongoing program to
evaluate future suggestions and consider other implementation
systems is necessary. An investigation of new forms of
transportation as they become cost effective will be included in
the analysis process. This total approach is necessary to make
possible inventory, analysis, and evaluation of all improvements.
Special consideration will be given to improved pedestrian safety
throughout the city, particularly where community facilities like
schools and parks increase foot traffic.
The plan views pedestrian traffic and the rights of the pedestrian
as an integral part of Kalamazoo's total transportation system.
Street Designations

It recommends improved pedestrian safety and adequate
pathways throughout the city, particularly where community
facilities like schools and parks increase fast traffic.

It is recommended for the purposes of priority improvement
budgeting and for encouraging the usage of designated streets
for through traffic movement, that thoroughfares be defined
as follows:
Expressways/Provide for rapid and efficient movement of large
volumes of through traffic between urban areas; not intended to
provide land-access service.
Arterials/Provide for through traffic movement in excess of 10,000
vehicles per day on a statewide, regional, metropolitan, and local
basis with controlled direct access to abutting property.*
Collector Streets/Provide for traffic movement between arterials
and local streets with direct access to abutting property; should
not form a secondary street system.

�Transportation Component

79

City of Kalamazoo
Local Streets/Provide for direct access to abutting land for local
traffic movement; through traffic on these streets should be
discouraged.

*Controlled direct access refers to design standards which
discourage excessive numbers of curb cuts which impede
traffic flow. Examples of the streets as defined are illustrated
below:
SUN VALLEY DA

LOCAL STREET

a:

0

0

z

&lt;(
...J

""
&lt;(

0

1-94

EXPRESSWAY

According to the above definitions, expressways and arterials
are graphically represented on Figure 16. Specific new
construction improvements are also indicated. Five improvements
are recommended, below, based upon needs of and benefit to
the community.
1 Exploration of the feasibility of an off-ramp connection east onto
U.S.131 Business Route for exit by northwest U.S.131 traffic.
2 Relocation of the U.S. 131 Business Route on Park Street and
Westnedge Avenue to Riverview Drive connection via Mosel
Avenue. The Riverview connection appears most feasible because
a) a select-link analysis on the Business Route between Douglas
and Westnedge avenues indicates that nearly 50 percent of that
traffic travels to and from Mosel Avenue; b) the County Road
Commission plans to reconstruct the Mosel Avenue bridge in the
near future; c) East Main, East Michigan, Gull Road and Riverview
Drive intersection areas, shown as deficient in 1995, require some
type of improvement; and d) the smallest number of residential
property acquisitions would be involved. These improvements are
seen as the first stage in the development of a limited access
business loop through or around the northeast quadrant of
the city.
3 Extension of Howard Street via a corridor to the 1-94 Business
Loop in the area of Alcott and Bryant streets. Although Reed

�Transportation Component

80

Comprehensive Plan
Street has been recommended as the eastward connection of
Howard Street, the planning analysis shows that a connection in
the industrial area near Alcott Street is more desirable because it
would interfere less with residential areas. The Bryant Street
corridor is recommended, due to existing vacant land on the south
side of the street which parallels the railroad tracks. Because of
the amount of land in this area, housing could be screened from
the improved roadway. A computer analysis shows this particular
connection contains the potential for relieving downtown traffic
on Michigan and Kalamazoo avenues by some 13,000 vehicles
per day.
4 The widening of Drake Road from Stadium Drive to Parkview
Avenue, with a grade separation at U.S.131 connecting Drake
Road where it currently dead ends at Parkview Avenue. Drake
Road is indicated as deficient in the 1955 projections. The land
adjacent to the suggested widening appears resistant to change
because there is no development on the street. This is not to
suggest that the area be developed, but that the road can be
widened without disrupting the area.
5 An improved connection from Lovers Lane to Burdick Street.
Because Burdick Street is not shown as deficient in 1995, better
utilization of this facility rather than the construction of a new
roadway is recommended. Operational improvements which are
being considered on Portage Street, Westnedge Avenue, and
Oakland Drive should also be considered for Burdick Street.
Because sufficient data is currently unavailable, collector streets
within neighborhoods will be designated following detailed
analysis of each area. This research, in conjunction with continued
neighborhood input, may prove that a traffic control approach is
necessary to redefine circulation patterns and eliminate through
traffic on local streets. Designated collector streets with certain
controls can channelize locally generated traffic to the arterial
network. Cul-de-sacs, traffic diverters or traffic circles can be
constructed to modify the grid street pattern to reduce through
traffic and conflicts on local streets.
CBD Considerations

Central Business District (CBD) traffic patterns have been
examined with respect to commercial and industrial
redevelopment, existing flow problems, access to parking, and
railroads.
Figure 17 depicts the future network. Specific changes from the
existing system include the following:
1 Return Michigan Avenue to two-way traffic from the intersection
of Kalamazoo and East Michigan avenues to West Main Street at
Douglas Avenue.

�Transportation Component

81

City of Kalamazoo
2 Reverse the direction of traffic on Kalamazoo Avenue from
Michikal to Riverview Drive. (Traffic west of Michikal on Kalamazoo
Avenue would become two-way.)
3 Upgrade Ransom Street to handle westbound traffic from Gull
Road to connect with Michikal, which would become two-way.
4 Designate Harrison Street as one-way south as part of a traffic
circle (Gull Road, Riverview Drive, Kalamazoo Avenue).
5 Designate Riverview Drive as the U.S. 131 Business Route and
improve the Riverview/ Ampersee arrangement including the
intersection of Kalamazoo Avenue, Riverview Drive, Mills Street,
in conjunction with further studies regarding the inadequacies of
east-west arterials.
6 Connect South Pitcher Street to Portage Street between Lovell
and Gibson Streets. Pitcher Street would become two-way and
serve the industrial corridor along the western side of the river.
7 Relocate Burdick Street from Cedar Street to connect with
Henrietta between Lovell and South Streets. The project will also
include the consideration of one-way traffic on Burdick and Rose
Streets north of Crosstown Parkway. Rose Street would remain
one-way south, south of Cedar Street.
8 Extend Lovell Street eastward to King Highway to provide access
from 1-94 to the CBD area. This is necessary because Kalamazoo
Avenue will become eastbound.
Railroad Element

The City of Kalamazoo is serviced by two interstate carriers: The
Grand Trunk Western (GTW) connecting Port Huron, Lansing and
South Bend with a branch line from Pavilion Township into
Kalamazoo; and ConRail, the primary rail line of Kalamazoo.
ConRail freight traffic generally flows in a north-south direction
(Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Elkhart). Although there is some
freight traffic, the primary purpose of the east-west line is to
provide the link in the Detroit-Chicago passenger (AMTRAK)
network.
The functional goals of the railroad portion of the Transportation
Component are to continue to improve rail service while solving
rail/highway conflicts within the Central Business District and
other problem areas, and to promote the upgrading of rail
trackage throughout Kalamazoo.

Scope

The analysis of the railroad problems and issues is based upon a
review of the area rail network including the identification of
directional flow patterns, abandoned lines and industrial/
commercial rail users. It also includes a review of past rail reports
as well as results of a series of meetings with ConRail and Grand
Trunk Western personnel.

�Transportation Component

82

Comprehensive Plan
The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) operates
its Chicago-Detroit passenger line through Kalamazoo. On this
route, the Depot, located south of the former Penn Central
railroad tracks between Rose and Burdick streets, is part of the
multi-modal transportation center being developed by the City of
Kalamazoo. The historic AMTRAK station is being renovated with
the financial assistance of the Michigan Department of State
Highways and Transportation.
ConRail serves some 73 industrial rail users in the city of
Kalamazoo, while Grand Trunk Western serves a total of 19
companies.
Trailer-on Flatcar (TOFC) Service

Trailer-on-Flatcar or piggyback service operates in Kalamazoo
from the ConRail Mosel Yard location. Piggyback freight service
transports highway trailers on rail flatcars. Once loaded on flatcars, the piggyback freight travels by rail to a designated regional
TOFC ramp. The remainder of the journey is completed by truck
delivery. This service provides access to rail transportation for
companies not located directly on a rail line. Piggyback service
is also more efficient for shipping high value and foreign goods.

Rail/Highway Conflict

Over the past eight months, city staff have worked closely with
ConRail and .Grand Trunk Western railroads as well as federal,
state, and local officials in developing a consolidation plan which
eliminates rail/highway conflicts for a number of years. In April
of 1975, a report entitled the East-Central Rail Highway Study was
completed by Commonwealth Associates of Jackson, Michigan.
Under contract with the City of Kalamazoo, the consultant outlined
strategies for relieving the existing problems. However, the
proposals were not funded for implementation.
In an effort to complete a Comprehensive Plan for this city, the
Kalamazoo Planning Commission began discussion of the
railroad issue in the spring of 1976. City planning staff conducted
several meetings with ConRail and Grand Trunk personnel over
the summer months. In September, the City Manager became
actively involved and, with planning staff, met with the Northern
Region General Manager of Con Rail and the Vice President of
Grand Trunk Western Railroad to formulate solutions to the
rail/highway conflicts. Alternatives were discussed in November
and preliminary engineering of the proposed solution was
presented by Con Rail to the City of Kalamazoo in January of 1977.
Other interested parties who have participated in the series of
rail meetings over the past eight months include the Rail Division
of the Michigan Department of State Highways and Transportation,
Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study, Kalamazoo County
Chamber of Commerce, and the City of Portage.

�Transportation Component

83

City of Kalamazoo
Statement of Problem

The rail/highway problems within the City of Kalamazoo are due
to a number of factors, the first of which is the proximity of the
ConRail main classification yard (Botsford Yard) to the Central
Business District (CBD). North-south and east-west ConRail
mainlines also intersect in the CBD and cross several major
streets and state trunklines. Two of the most critically affected
roadways blocked for extended periods of time are important
access routes to the CBD. Such blockage not only strains vehicular
movement, but causes hardships on nearby businesses and
discourages shopping in the CBD.
The problem is further complicated by the fact that there are
three parallel north-south rail lines in the downtown area which
are inadequately connected to the east-west mainline and Botsford
Yard. These north-south lines include the former Pennsylvania
Railroad or Grand Rapids and Indiana (GR&amp;I); the former New
York Central Railroad, currently known as the Kalamazoo Branch;
and the former Chicago, Kalamazoo, and Saginaw Railroad
(CK&amp;S).
To move to and from Botsford Yard, trains are required to back
out of the classification area on a section of track constructed at
14 degrees of curvature. Trains travel 15 miles per hour on a 1O
degree curve and 25 miles per hour on an 8 degree curve,
according to ConRail.
The following examples of freight movement through Kalamazoo
illustrate many aspects of the existing problems. Each day, a
freight train leaves Elkhart, Indiana for Grand Rapids via
Kalamazoo. North of Gibson Street, the railroad tracks are
constructed at 14-degree curvature and the train must slow down
at this point. After the cars are reassembled in Botsford Yard, the
same train must back down the Kalamazoo Branch past the GR&amp;I
connection and switch to the GR&amp;I to continue north to Grand
Rapids. When the freight travels south on the way back to Elkhart
via Kalamazoo, the process is reversed.
While most of the Con Rail freight traffic moves in a north-south
direction, Grand Trunk Western (GTW) Railroad shipments
usually end at Michigan Avenue. Only one GTW train per day
travels north of Kalamazoo and Michigan Avenues. This train
contains fewer than 10 cars. The GTW railroad has a small
classification yard at Mills Street and King Highway; GTW
movements, however, do not create any rail/highway conflicts
in Kalamazoo.
Another problem concerning the railroads is the general condition
of all rail crossings in Kalamazoo. Of 123 rail crossings, 111 are
Con Rail and 12 are Grand Trunk. The city has applications under
consideration for federal assistance in upgrading these crossings.

�Transportation Component

84

Comprehensive Plan
Recommendations

To accomplish the functional goals of the railroad system, the
following strategies are outlined.

Potential Implementation
Techniques

Passenger and industrial rail service can be better maintained
if the city remains active in the process of evaluating essential
and nonessential track in Kalamazoo. The city must discourage
the abandonment of essential lines and service, and purchase
abandoned right-of-ways for such uses as bike paths and
roadways. The rail/highway conflict can be alleviated if the city
promotes the rescheduling of local train traffic during nonpeak
hours of vehicular traffic and supports operational programs
intended to monitor local and through train traffic, such as the
Centralized Traffic Control.
The city can promote the upgrading of railroad tracks in
Kalamazoo by coordinating: 1) development of an ongoing
inventory system of all lines in the city; 2) preparation of an
inventory of conditions of all rail lines and rail/street crossings;
3) a priority program for crossing improvements in conjunction
with the two railroads; and 4) financial assistance to accomplish
the upgradings.
The best available approach at this time for accomplishing the
rail goals includes a short range plan addressing rescheduling
issues and limited construction projects. However, as other or
more satisfactory solutions are developed, they will be reviewed
in relationship to the plan's overall goals and incorporated as
necessary. Present action included within the plan are the
upgrading of the road-rail crossings on a prioritized basis and four
new, improved connections and/or relocations:
1 The relocation of the Kalamazoo Branch north of Gibson Street
to connect with the Chicago, Kalamazoo &amp; Saginaw Branch
(CK&amp;S) at Kalamazoo Avenue, including a direct connection
eastward into Botsford Yard, preferably at a less-than-10-degree
curve.
2 A connection from the east-west mainline north to the CK&amp;S to
allow direct access to and from the north and the east.
3 Utilization of the GTW tracks at Gibson Street as opposed to the
CK&amp;S tracks between Gibson Street and Kalamazoo Avenue.
4 A connection of the GTW and GR&amp;I north of Mosel Avenue where
the tracks begin to parallel west of the river.
Construction and relocation of the projects, shown on Figure 18,
will eliminate the present backup movements within Kalamazoo
as well as allow trains to travel at faster speeds through the city.
It will also consolidate the existing three north-south crossings
on Kalamazoo and Michigan Avenues into one crossing.

�Transportation Component

85

City of Kalamazoo
This move would include consolidation of the Mosel (piggyback)
Yard to the new location south of the main line. Trains would then
travel from the south into the classification yard via the GTW
tracks at Gibson Street and across the river. An upgrading of the
existing bridge at this point would be necessary, as well as the
construction of a Gibson Street connection joining the Kalamazoo
Branch to the GTW just south of the Clarage Fan Company.
Safety precautions were also discussed for future consideration,
in terms of higher train speeds.
Metro Transit Element

The Metro Transit goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to encourage
the increased ridership and continued development of a mass
transit system designed to move citizens to their desired
destinations.
Public ownership of the Metro Transit system began in 1967 upon
recommendation of a majority of the citizens of Kalamazoo.
Federal legislation has provided for financial assistance to the
bus system for capital and, recently, for operating expenses. Such
assistance has also provided for newly implemented services and
promotional programs.
In response to the federal dollars made available in 1974, the City
of Kalamazoo completed a Transit Development Plan (TOP) for the
urban area in March of 1975. The plan outlined anticipated
improvements in transit service for a five-year period. The original
problems outlined in the 1975 TOP have been refined and
expanded in an effort to improve and maintain better bus service.

Scope

In addition to present operational levels, the analysis of Metro
Transit service includes review of the proposals outlined in the
TOP and subsequent revisions.
At present, bus patronage constitutes only 5 percent of all person
trips generated in Kalamazoo. The current cost of each ride is
subsidized 80 percent by local, state, and federal funds.
Metro Transit now includes seven bus routes on a cross-city
pattern. All routes converge at a central transfer point in the
Central Business District (CBO). Each route is double-ended,
running from one outbound point to the CBO and continuing to an
outbound point at the opposite side of the city. (Refer to Figure 19
for the current route structure.)
The city has installed new shelters throughout the city to provide
bus patrons with shelter from inclement weather. Metro Transit
has also launched an advertising campaign to attract a larger
clientele. The advertising is intended not only to promote transit,
but also to explain new concepts and programs.

�Transportation Component

86

Comprehensive Plan
To modify and maintain adequate routes as well as to meet latent
demands, the Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study (KATS) and
Metro Transit staffs plan to conduct surveys that will provide data
to evaluate the existing route structure.
Metro Transit plans to use a number of small 25-35 passenger
buses, featuring hydraulic lifts and removal seats for persons in
wheelchairs. Other strategies include construction of the new bus
garage in the CBD, and maintenance of a fleet of large buses with
an average age of less than five years.
Implementation of peripheral service through experimental
looping will provide area citizens the service they have been
requesting. A limited demand-response program will also provide
area citizens with additional service. Nine mini-buses will
operate in nine zones on a door-to-door basis as feeders to the
regular routes.
Finally, a new bus garage to store and maintain Metro Transit
buses is expected to be completed in the fall of 1977. The new
facility is located within the CBD on Ransom Street between Rose
and Burdick streets, across from the AMTRAK Depot - an area
already well developed as the city's multi-modal transportation
center. The center will link intra-city buses with inter-city buses,
trains, and possible limousine service.
Recommendations

T

Airport Element

Recognizing the importance of Metro Transit within the multimodal approach to Kalamazoo's transportation system, several
strategies to increase patronage are outlined in the
Comprehensive Plan. If the limited construction approach to
streets and highways is to be successful, use of Metro Transit
as an alternative transportation choice must be increased.
To provide better bus service and meet changing needs, the plan
recommends continual evaluation of route patterns and
monitoring of service demands. The plan also endorses specific
techniques, such as park-and-ride programs, limited demandresponse service, and implementation of experimental looping
as a means of promoting increased use of Metro Transit and of
providing more person trips in fewer vehicles. Since technological
changes occur rapidly, the plan recommends that the city continue
to investigate innovative means of mass transportation in
Kalamazoo.
Airways Engineering Corporation of Washington, D.C. is currently
completing a Southwest Michigan Regional Airport Study at the
request of the City of Kalamazoo. The purpose of the multi-phased
report is to identify the need for and guide the development of a
regional airport serving Southwestern Michigan, centered around
the Kalamazoo and Battle Creek metropolitan areas.

�Transportation Component

87

City of Kalamazoo
Scope

Aviation use of the site currently called the Kalamazoo Municipal
Airport began in 1923. In the mid-1920's, the Kalamazoo Airport
Association was formed as a nonprofit Michigan Corporation.
Community leaders requested designation as a scheduled stop
on the commercial air route from Detroit to Chicago to St. Paul in
1926. In August of the same year, the airport was formally
dedicated, "Indian Fields Park." In 1929, an Airport Advisory
Board was created and the City acquired full title to the land,
making Kalamazoo the first city in Michigan to have a statelicensed municipal airport.
The Kalamazoo Municipal Airport covers 541 acres of land and
includes three runways and associated taxiways. General
aviation hangar/apron facilities are divided into three main areas,
including five conventional hangars for public use and eight
T-hangar buildings with a total of 85 stalls.
Kalamazoo Municipal Airport is used primarily by small aircraft:
light twin-engine and single-engine planes. Some business jets
and turbo-props also use the facility. Service presently includes
17 daily flights, with 5 flights direct to Chicago; 4 additional
Chicago flights stopping in South Bend, Indiana; 5 direct flights
to Detroit; and 3 additional Detroit flights, stopping in Jackson,
Michigan. Scheduled passenger trips for 1974 totalled 101,256.

Recommendations

Prior to completion of the Comprehensive Plan for Kalamazoo,
the City Commission determined to complete the runway
extension at the Kalamazoo Municipal Airport to accommodate
DC-9 aircraft. To date, the Environmental Impact Statement
concerning the runway extension has been approved by the State
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Noise levels expected
as a result of the runway extension and DC-9 aircraft meet EPA
standards. Federal approval of the Environmental Impact
Statement is still pending.
The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the need for commercial air
service in the Kalamazoo area. It recognizes, too, the concern of
the residential area adjacent to the airport and, therefore, strongly
supports the city's development of a noise abatement program in
conjunction with the runway extension.

�Transportation Glossary

88

Comprehensive Plan
Amtrak

National Railroad Passenger Corporation.

Capacity

the maximum number of vehicles which can pass over a particular
section of roadway during a specific period of time under
prevailing roadway and traffic conditions. Capacities can
generally be expected to approximate 2000 vehicles per lane per
hour under ideal conditions.

Centralized Traffic Control

a device used by railroads to monitor train traffic throughout the
city. ConRail plans to implement such a system in Kalamazoo
in 1977.

Conrail

Consolidated Rail Corporation; a semi-public corp. structured to
consolidate bankrupt but potentially profitable lines in the
Northeast Region of the United States.

Contra-Flow

a traffic operations methodology whereby a majority of the street
lanes are used to transport traffic into an area in the a.m. rush
hour and out of the area in the p.m. rush hour. e.g. given a four
lane facility, three lanes into the Central Business District and
one lane out of the Central Business District during the a.m. rush
hour and the opposite during the evening.

"Deadhead" Time

the time a bus spends on the road traveling from the bus garage
to the Central Business District where its route begins each day;
no revenues are generated during this time.

Exact Fare Policy

Metro Transit bus patrons must pay with exact change, otherwise
25¢ bus passes are issued as "change". This policy was
implemented in September, 1976.

Level of Service

a qualitative measure of operating conditions that may occur on a
given lane or roadway when it is accommodating various traffic
volumes.

Limited Demand-Response

a Metro Transit program in which buses operate in zones on a
door-to-door basis transporting riders to a central point for bus
transfer.

"Looping" Concept

a form of peripheral bus service whereby loops are formed at the
enss of the spoke-like routes, e.g. the West Main bus would travel
from the Central Business District to Drake Road and travel back
to the Central Business District via Drake Road to Parkview
Avenue to Oakland Drive.

Peak Hour

that daily hour in the a.m. and p.m. whereby traffic demand is at
its highest.

--

-------

----------

Trailer-On-Flatcar (TOFC)

a form of transport whereby truck trailers travel on rail flatcars
to regional delivery points. The remainder of travel is made
by highway.

�Transportation Component

89

City of Kalamazoo - - - - - - - - Arterial Designation
Figure 16

I\

1 TwJ
-.&amp;:-~1---amo

Oshtemo ..-w,

---r-• . I

toper Twp

Coopur

azoo

Kalamazoo Twp

1

I

Tw;f'R ch 3nd T ""
,vp

Comstock Tw

.. I

I

I

II

1--13a

I
4

---~-Oshtemo Two
Texas Twp

I

1s.a1arnazoo Twp

I Po,tage rw

I

94

I
Expressways
Arterials
•·---

Potential Improvements
Source: City Planning Commission, Kalamazoo, Michigan

�Transportation Component

----------------■

Comprehensive Plan
Proposed Traffic Flow: CBD
Figure 17

90

�Transportation Component

91

City of Kalamazoo
Phase I Short-Range Rail Solutions
Figure 18

�Transportation Component

92

Comprehensive Plan

-------------------

Existing Route Structure and ¼ Mile Service Area
Figure 19

1

I

-.&amp;::-~----I
lamoTwJtoperTwp

Oshtemo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

---~-Oshtemo Twp
Texas Twp

I

Kalamazoo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I Portage Twp

1-94

I
Existing Routes
Looping Route
¼ Mile Service Area

I

Comstock Twp

r --- ►---1fr::"T"'
rwmooTw,

I
\ I
II
&amp;.J

I
I

���Community Facilities Component

97

City of Kalamazoo
The Community Facilities Component of the Comprehensive Plan
refers to the public use and ownership of buildings. The term is
generally applied to those physical elements associated with the
delivery of community services. Kalamazoo's community facilities
analysis includes schools, libraries, fire stations, city
administration, police and court facilities, and health service
facilities.
Many of these facilities are not under direct control of city
government but still provide public services. For this reason the
collection and analysis of current and anticipated need has been
closely coordinated with the various controlling agencies. In this
manner, a balanced and accurate relationship of the Community
Facilities Component can be made to both the Land Use and the
Transportation components.
Municipal Administrative Center,
Police and Court Facilities

The analysis of Kalamazoo's City Hall, police, and court buildings
represents an initial step toward setting operational policies
concerning the expansion and location of municipal offices. This
report analyzes the existing and future space needs of the city
administration in relation to the natural demand for increased
services.

Scope

The City of Kalamazoo has enjoyed a long history of good
municipal administration. As the demand for municipal services
has grown and the complexity of administration has increased,
the city organization has been modified and modernized as
necessary. In 1970, the City of Kalamazoo undertook a study of
the organization and management of municipal government.
Many of the resultant proposals have been implemented. In 1972,
the city prepared a long range study of the expansion of
administrative buildings in Kalamazoo. The latter projected space
needs for City Hall, the Police Department, and the District Court
through the year 1990. These reports and studies formed the basis
for the analysis contained in the Municipal Administrative Center,
Police and Court Facilities Report.
Future municipal administrative space requirements are seen as
an outgrowth of increased government employment in response
to demands for municipal services. Because of increased services
related to noncriminal activity, Police Department responsibilities
outstripped population growth in the city and urban area.
For example, minor cases which include public accidents, home
accidents, dog bites and the like, the general conditions which
include lost property, found property, trouble with neighbors,
etc. have increased. This has resulted in the extreme overcrowding
of the present police facilities. Every available space is now being
used, including, in some cases, the open hallways.
Significant increases in district court workloads have also

�Community Facilities Component

98

Comprehensive Plan
occurred in the past ten years due to a change in organizational
structure and operational emphasis. One solution to the present
overcrowding caused by these changes is the possible state
financing and reorganization of district courts.
Recommendations

Of all the recommendations, the most significant is the
consideration given to maintaining a concentration of city
administrative offices in the Central Business District. General
location and design issues are given careful consideration in the
expansion of Kalamazoo's existing civic center grouping around
Bronson Park. These items include the quality of urban design,
evaluation of long-range parking facilities and increased evening
activities.
Specific projects recommended are the expansion of City Hall
and Police facilities.

Fire Protection Facilities

The Kalamazoo Fire Protection Facilities Study analyzes existing
and projected population needs as they relate to delivery of fire
protection. The study area approximates the boundaries of the City
of Kalamazoo including Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo
and Nazareth Colleges, and the Kalamazoo State Hospital.

Scope

Major topics of the study include an inventory of existing facilities,
fire protection and insurance ratings; and the need to improve
fire facility locations in relationship to service areas.
Kalamazoo is serviced by seven fire stations. The existing
distribution, based on one-mile and one-and-one-half-mile travel
time distances from existing facilities, provides good protection
to most mature and middle-city areas. However, outlying new and
developing areas, such as in the western portion of the city
between Parkview and Grand Prairie, and along Westnedge
Avenue between Cork Street and Kilgore Road are covered by a
limited number of large-response assignment areas. In response
to this need, the Kalamazoo Fire Department is investigating the
possibility of reciprocal fire protection agreements with adjacent
townships. Adequate fire flow or the number of gallons of water
per minute that would be required to extinguish fires, is
maintained throughout the city. This includes both existing and
proposed high value districts of existing high density residential,
commercial, and industrial development.

Recommendations

A major recommendation regarding fire protection in Kalamazoo
is to continue the present evaluation process of fire facilities and
service areas on a citywide basis. Station-by-station monitoring
provides information on changes in service demand and allows
replacement and consolidation of existing fire facilities in an
equitable manner. These actions therefore are seen as improving
the efficiency of the Kalamazoo Fire Department without altering
its fire response capabilities.

�Community Facilities Component

99

City of Kalamazoo
Currently the Eastside, Douglas, and Cork Street fire stations are
undergoing an assessment process to examine utilization of
equipment and/or personnel. Within the context of the
Comprehensive Plan it is recommended that current levels of fire
protection be maintained and expanded as growth occurs. It also
encourages area-wide fire service agreements with adjacent local
governmental units as necessary. Figure 20 locates the existing
and proposed fire stations as well as travel distances.
Library Facilities

The library portion of the Community Facility Analysis examines
the Kalamazoo Public Library system, its function and the factors
that affect it. The goal of the library report is to encourage better
library service for all of the citizens of Kalamazoo through the
analysis of existing and future library needs. The report presents
an initial step in the formation of operational policies and
guidelines for locating future facilities.

Scope

In an effort to determine existing and future library needs the
report presents an inventory of library services within the
metropolitan area. At present the Kalamazoo library system
operates five area libraries, three within the city (the Central
Library, the Powell Branch and the Washington Square Branch).
The library system maintains circulating and reference collections
for children, young adults, and adults. It also operates a district
bookmobile and a county bookmobile, and houses a museum and
a planetarium within the main building. Figure 21 locates the five
libraries.
The old concept of the library as a facility to serve children and
scholars is no longer true. Facilities and programs have been
expanded to include music, art, special seminars, exhibits,
bookmobiles, films, cable television, microfilming, reproduction,
etc. Service to young adults in Kalamazoo is increasing. In the
past this age group almost ceased using the library shortly after
leaving high school. Today, with increasing educational
attainments and more leisure time available, the young adult is
using the library to continue his education. The demand for library
services for adults is also increasing with the realization that the
library is a source of technical information. Not only must services
be available for recreational and educational reading, but libraries
are often used by groups with special interests, such as
businessmen, industrialists, and farmers.

Recommendations

New approaches to library planning and programming are evident
in Kalamazoo. The consortium of Kalamazoo libraries is one
example: this system of cross-library use provides community
access to academic, public, and special libraries. An expansion
of this type of programming is encouraged as a means of
broadening the opportunities for the citizens of Kalamazoo. The
most significant recommendation is that, in general, future sites
for branch libraries should be located in or adjacent to community

�Community Facilities Component

100

Comprehensive Plan
or medium sized shopping centers. Based on projected need,
a specific recommendation is made to expand the present Central
Library within the next five years.

Health Service Facilities

Scope

The City of Kalamazoo does not provide municipal public health
services. However, the health needs of Kalamazoo's citizens are
more than adequately met by private physicians, hospitals, and
specialized institutions. These activities, supplemented by state
and county public health agencies, provide health care beyond
what is normally expected for a community this size. The goal of
this report is to encourage the continuation of the innovative and
comprehensive health care presently available to the community.
The Health Service report analyzes health care provisions in
Kalamazoo. Four kinds of facilities are covered: 1) general
hospital facilities, 2) community mental health facilities, 3) family
health centers, and 4) nursing homes.

rKalamazoo is served by two major general hospitals, Borgess
and Bronson. The two hospitals have been in competition for many
years. However, this competition has been beneficial to the
community. Refer to Figure 22 for location of health care facilities.
General Hospital Facilities

Borgess Hospital is a 473-bed acute-care hospital located on Gull
Road. The hospital is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Joseph of
Nazareth, Michigan. Located on the Gull Road property are a main
366,000 square foot hospital, a companion physicians' office
building, a companion ambulatory care building, some houses on
Shafer Street, and an interns' residence. The original hospital
building was constructed in 1917, with substantial additions made
in 1929, in the 1950's, and in 1971. Recently constructed was a
22,000 square foot emergency and trauma center located adjacent
to the 1971 North building, and the former nursing residence was
remodeled for use as an ambulatory care clinic. Both of these
projects were completed and operational in late 1976. In addition
to the projects currently under construction, the hospital has
proposed the construction of a 35-unit physicians' office building
on the east end of the property. The hospital has also proposed
the addition of four stories to the North building to house
additional patient beds, a surgical and radiology department,
a remodeled pharmacy, and a central sterile supply department.
Bronson Hospital is a 461-bed general hospital located on East
Lovell Street in Kalamazoo's Central Business District. The
hospital stands on land purchased by the Kalamazoo Hospital
Association in 1900. Currently located on the hospital property
are a main hospital building, an incorporated physicians' office
building, and a multi-story automobile garage. A school of
nursing is operated at the facility. Bronson Hospital has expanded
its facility in a staged program of development. The current
structure can be divided into four sections, or service stacks, all

J

�Community Facilities Component

101

City of Kalamazoo
in various phases of maturity. The past policy of the hospital has
been to build new bed space while converting the obsolete areas
into administrative office space.
Off-street parking is currently deficient at the hospital. Employee
parking presents the most trouble because of the necessity of
overlapping shifts. The hospital is currently served by a 350-car
three-story enclosed parking ramp, which has vertical expansion
capability to contain 1,000 cars. However, expansion of this
parking facility would be expensive. The hospital administration
would prefer entering into a long-term leasing arrangement with
the City of Kalamazoo which could be coordinated with
implementation of the current South Mall Parking Study.
The hospitals of Kalamazoo serve the needs of a relatively large
population in a geographic area half-way to Battle Creek and, for
a greater distance, toward the smaller hospitals and smaller
towns of Plainwell, Allegan, Paw Paw, Vicksburg and Three Rivers.
Within this area, 80 percent or more of the population comes
either to Borgess or Bronson Hospital. Within the Kalamazoo core
area, including the cities of Parchment, Portage, and part of
Comstock, 95 percent come to the local hospitals. Discussions
with hospital planning personnel of the Michigan Department of
Public Health indicate that the growth of Borgess and Bronson
Hospitals in the future will be largely tied to the overall growth of
population in the Kalamazoo metropolitan area.
Mental Health Facilities

Although Borgess Hospital maintains the Delano Clinic, a hospital
attached to the Community Mental Health Center, the major
mental health facility in Kalamazoo is the Kalamazoo State
Hospital. This facility serves an 11-county area in Southwestern
Michigan. The hospital's activities are directed through the State
of Michigan Mental Health Department. Currently, the hospital
houses 850 patients, and hospital planning personnel foresee a
stabilized patient population for the future of approximately 600.
As a result of the state's plan to decentralize mental health care,
the Kalamazoo State Hospital is expected to be used in the future
for intensive psychiatric care and services not available at local
community mental health centers.
The Kalamazoo State Hospital has under its jurisdiction 260 acres
within the city, and represents a major land use. The property
includes two sites, the largest being the 250-acre main facility
located on Oakland Drive. The second parcel is a ten-acre
northwest site located on Blakeslee Street. This 200-bed unit is
scheduled to be abandoned within the next two years. This action
will leave the State Hospital with only its main facility.
As a result of the trend toward community-based treatment rather
than institutionalization of persons requiring supervised
residential care, licensed foster care facilities are permitted in all

�Community Facilities Component

102

Comprehensive Plan
residential zones under State of Michigan law. Currently, there
are 44 adult foster family homes in the city housing a maximum of
six adults apiece and 14 adult foster group facilities housing
between 7 to 20 persons apiece.
Family Health Centers

Kalamazoo currently has one family health center located on West
Paterson Street which provides comprehensive health services to
any low-income resident of Kalamazoo County or the north
Kalamazoo community regardless of income. Fees are charged
for specific services needed, but may be reduced in relation to a
family's ability to pay. The Kalamazoo Family Health Center is
supported by fees, individual and foundation contributions and
grants.
The center has 5,500 registered members, 4,000 of which are
considered active. Seventy percent of the membership is from
the northside community.

Nursing Homes

Licensed nursing homes and licensed homes for the aged are an
integral component of the total health services in Kalamazoo.
They present special planning problems because they very often
exist within or in close proximity to residential neighborhoods
containing private homes. Kalamazoo presently has five licensed
nursing homes, and two licensed homes for the aged. Licensed
nursing homes range in size from the 24-bed Smith Memorial
Home, to the 180-bed Ridgeview Manor. The city currently has a
total of 513 nursing home beds or a ratio of 6.0 beds per 1,000
population (based on 1970 population).

Recommendations

Currently, area health programs are coordinated through the
South Central Michigan Health Planning Council. A continual
dialogue is maintained on a local level through the City of
Kalamazoo Medical Planning Commission. Recommendations in
the Community Facilities Plan encourage this form of cooperation
among Kalamazoo's major health care institutions.

It is recommended that because Bronson Hospital is in the
downtown area and Borgess Hospital is in a developing
residential district in northeastern Kalamazoo, special
consideration be given in each case when expansion is planned;
particularly in relation to parking, traffic generation, and potential
residential development. It is further recommended that both
institutions carry on land-banking programs for expansion and
parking; and that hospital-related housing be explored. Provisions
for this type of housing are made in the Land Use Component.
The City of Kalamazoo supports continued improvement in the
delivery of health services to city residents. These services can
be provided through existing health care facilities.
Where need for physically locating services in a given

�Community Facilities Component

103

City of Kalamazoo
neighborhood is clearly established, it is recommended that
available structures, such as school buildings, be used rather
than new facility construction.
Recommendations are also made concerning the development of
health care facilities in close proximity to residential districts.
These recommendations detail requirements which will protect
the quality of the surrounding neighborhoods such as: adequate
parking, landscaping and screening requirements.
The Comprehensive Plan also recommends that the licensing of
additional adult foster care facilities includes consideration of
nearby residents and that a balance be sought between communitybased treatment and legitimate neighborhood concerns.
Neighborhood Centers

The City of Kalamazoo supports the concept of neighborhood
community centers where the individual neighborhood defines
such a need. Community centers can provide a cohesive function
in a neighborhood and contribute to its stability and improvement.
Because of recurring concerns about funding for construction,
maintenance, utilities and staffing, the Comprehensive Plan
recommends the maximum utilization of available structures such
as schools which offer both office and recreational facilities.

School Facilities

The school facilities portion of the Kalamazoo community
facilities analysis is a broad statement of intentions and strategies
within the context of a general approach to educational facilities
planning. The aim of the school facilities report is to encourage
the development and maintenance of public educational facilities
that best provide intellectual, cultural, and vocational
opportunities to the whole spectrum of the community as well as
to their student population.
The primary objective of the school facilities analysis is to provide
a basis for coordination of school programming with the projected
plans of other public agencies involved or related to school
activities. A secondary objective is the delineation of existing
facilities, possible new construction, future obsolescent and
possible abandonment of educational facilities.

Scope

In an effort to determine the present and future capacity of
Kalamazoo's educational facilities, an analysis was made of the
existing and projected school enrollment and an inventory of all
school facilities, both public and private, was taken, including
primary, secondary, and post-secondary institutions. Primary and
secondary school location, classroom size, and gross physical
structure were evaluated for each facility in relation to present
and future demands. Figure 26 outlines the Kalamazoo Public
School District.

�Community Facilities Component

104

Comprehensive Plan
Projected Kalamazoo Area
Primary and Secondary School
Enrollment Trends

Public and private school enrollment in the Kalamazoo area has
declined significantly during recent years as shown in Tables 11
and 12. This reflects a national trend attributable to significant
changes in family composition, e.g., relatively large numbers of
small families, single persons, and young married couples without
children. The impact of this trend on the City of Kalamazoo's
long-term growth potential is uncertain at this time.
Kalamazoo area school enrollment trends for the years 1975
through 1995 are projected in Table 13. Trends are indicated for
public school and nonpublic school enrollment. The public school
enrollment projection is based on separate elementary school,
junior high school, and senior high school projections.
The projections contained in Table 13 were based on three primary
factors: 1) Kalamazoo area population growth, 2) anticipated
long-range school-age population levels, and 3) past school
enrollment trends.
Nonpublic school enrollment projections contained in Table 13
are based on the assumption that such enrollment will represent
approximately 18 percent of total enrollment. This is consistent
with the average ratio of public school enrollment to total school
enrollment evidenced during recent years. However, long-term
trends suggest that nonpublic school enrollment could decline
to a slightly smaller proportion of total school enrollment.
The school enrollment projections contained in Table 13 reflect
the interaction of two demographic trends: 1) moderately
increasing population levels, and 2) steadily declining proportions
of school age persons to total population.
The projections indicate school enrollment is expected to decline
steadily through 1985, and then begin to increase slightly through
1995. Total public school and nonpublic school enrollment was
projected to be 15,800 in 1975 and 17,200 in 1995. Public school
enrollment is expected to decline from 14,800 in 1975 to 13,000
in 1985, then increase to 14,100 by 1995. Considerable fluctuation
is projected in the relation between public elementary, junior high,
and senior high school enrollments. This fluctuation is attributed
to the movement of different sized age cohorts through the
population over the twenty-year period between 1975 and 1995.
Because these fluctuations are self-adjusting over time, detailed
planning of elementary, junior high, and senior high school needs
should be met with a balanced and flexible school inventory.

Existing Public School Facilities

The school board feels at this time its present inventory of
facilities can meet future demands. Currently the system contains
23 elementary schools, 5 junior high schools, 2 senior high
schools and 3 special education facilities. (Refer to Figure 24)

�Community Facilities Component

105

City of Kalamazoo
Elementary School Facilities

Table 14 contains basic data on elementary schools derived from
the educational facilities survey. Table 14 shows an inventory of
generally old elementary schools. Median age for all 23 schools
is 44 years. Eight of the 23 schools are over 50 years old and at
least ten of them are old enough so that kindergarteners who
entered them in the fall of 1975 may be using the same classrooms
their grandparents used in elementary school. No new elementary
schools have been built during the past ten years. Only nine
schools, those 11 to 23 years old, can be considered in the prime
of their functional life. There is only one interme iate-aged
elementary school, the Lakewood School, built 37 years ago.
Most of the older elementary schools are located in the mature
city or the middle city. The median age for mature and middle-city
elementary schools is 52 years. A few older elementary schools
are located in the new city, the developing city, or outside the city
limits. These can be found along major arterials which were the
paths for advancing urbanization.

Junior High School and
High School Facilities

Table 15 contains basic data on junior high schools and high
schools derived from the educational facilities survey. The table
depicts a large, fairly new inventory. The median age for the seven
junior and senior high schools is 17 years, and the oldest of the
seven, South Junior High School, is only 25 years old. The junior
and senior high schools are relatively large facilities. The median
building size of the junior high schools is 100,000 square feet.
The two high schools contain 303,000 square feet and 321,000
square feet. Considering projected population trends and the age
of existing facilities, none of Kalamazoo's junior or senior high
schools should need replacing before the second or third decade
of the 21st century.

Community Education Center

The school system's old Central High School is being utilized as
a community education facility which accommodates a broad
range of activities and services including community education,
County Health Department clinics, public recreation facilities,
and School Board functions.
The old Central High School in which the Community Education
Center is located is 62 years old and has an addition 51 years old.
The basic structure of the facility is reported to be sound and the
school board has adopted the policy of preserving it for future use.
However, extensive remodeling is needed. The total size of the
building is 119,000 square feet. It contains 50 classrooms of
approximately 570 square feet each. This is small by current
standards, but adequate to serve the class sizes typical of the
community education programs. The Community Education Center
is located on a small site (3.89 acres) and parking is severely
inadequate.

Special Education Programs
and Facilities

The Kalamazoo Public School System operates special education
programs for approximately 650 students. Six specific programs

�Community Facilities Component

106

Comprehensive Plan
are designed for: 1) trainable mentally impaired, 2) educable
mentally impaired, 3) physically or otherwise health-impaired,
4) emotionally impaired, 5) learning disabled, and 6) hearing
impaired.
Most of these programs are carried out within regular elementary,
junior high, or senior high school facilities. However, about
one-third of the students are accommodated in three special
education centers: the J. F. Kennedy Center, the Upjohn Center,
and the Lakeside Center.
Community Use of
Public School Facilities

Community use of public school facilities is fostered by the
Community School Executive Board. The board is made up of
members from the Board of Education, the Upjohn Institute, the
Kalamazoo Parks and Recreation Department, and other agencies.
The board operates the community school program in five
elementary schools and three junior high schools distributed
throughout the city and outlying portions of the school district.
These schools are: 1) Lincoln Elementary, 2) Edison Elementary,
3) Washington Elementary, 4) Indian Prairie Elementary, 5) Chime
Elementary, 6) South Junior High, 7) Milwood Junior High, and
8) Northeastern Junior High. The community school program
provides for a broad range of neighborhood activities and offers a
variety of enrichment programs for all age groups. The community
schools contain neighborhood drop-in centers, designed to foster
a stronger sense of neighborhood identity. Each community
school has a local advisory council which organizes and
coordinates neighborhood-related activities.
Although the community schools are specially designated centers
for intensive community use, other Kalamazoo area public
schools are also available to community organizations.
Respondents of a facilities survey indicate 25 of the 28 elementary,
junior high, and high schools are used by community
organizations.
Ten of the city's public schools are utilized for the Kalamazoo
Parks and Recreation Department summer program. The program
includes outdoor recreation activities such as softball, badminton,
and cricket, as well as craft activities such as batik, macrame, and
painting. The 10 schools are: 1) Arcadia Elementary, 2) Burke
Acres Elementary, 3) Greenwood Elementary, 4) Oakwood
Elementary, 5) Parkwood Elementary, 6) West Main Street
Elementary, 7) South Westnedge Elementary, 8) Spring Valley
Elementary, 9) Vine Elementary and 10) South Junior High School.
These schools were selected to provide recreation programs in
neighborhoods where City Parks and Recreation Department
facilities are not available.

Phased-Out School Facilities

There are six public school buildings in the city which are no
longer utilized by the Kalamazoo Public Schools: Grand Prairie,

�Community Facilities Component

107

City of Kalamazoo
Pleasant Park, Peter Pan, Hillcrest, Fairview, and Roosevelt
schools. Declining enrollment has eliminated the need for the
classroom space these facilities provide and the busing program
has eliminated the role they played as neighborhood schools.
There are several reasons why these facilities have been phased
out: 1) they were too small to permit efficient operation, 2) they
needed substantial rehabilitation in order to bring them up to
modern standards and 3) they are located away from the city's
main concentrations of elementary age students.
The school board would prefer to avoid demolition of phased-out
schools whenever possible; it has adopted a policy of seeking
alternative public or private uses. Four of the six vacant facilities
have been leased to public institutions in the Kalamazoo area.
The Grand Prairie and Pleasant Park Schools are utilized by the
Kalamazoo Valley Intermediate School District.
Services of the Kalamazoo Valley
Intermediate School District

The Kalamazoo Valley Intermediate School District (KVISD) is an
outstanding service agency meeting various needs of the
Kalamazoo area. A service agency for public school districts,
KVISD currently provides four special service programs and four
educational programs to client school districts. KVISD presents a
strong potential for design and implementation of educational
programs needed to improve housing and neighborhood
conditions in Kalamazoo's older neighborhoods. Such educational
services could be provided either directly through KVISD or
through public school districts with the technical assistance of
KVISD.

Colleges and
Western Michigan University

One university and three colleges exist in the Kalamazoo area.
While Western Michigan University and Kalamazoo and Nazareth
colleges are located within the city limits, Kalamazoo Valley
Community College is located in Oshtemo Township. Figure 25
pinpoints each of these institutions.
Western Michigan University's campus consists of two areas
divided by the Con Rail (Amtrak) Railroad, Stadium Drive, and
athletic fields. The East Campus is the site of the original school
founded in 1903. Land to the northwest of Stadium Drive was
purchased in 1946. All recent expansion has occurred in the West
Campus which has become the main campus.
A Western Michigan University Campus Development Plan was
completed in 1970 based on a maximum anticipated enrollment
of 20,000 full-time equated students. According to the plan, these
enrollment objectives can be met within an area generally
bounded by: a) Stadium Drive and ConRail (Amtrak) Railroad on
the south, b) Howard Street on the west, c) existing residential
areas beyond the residence halls on the north, and d) Kalamazoo
College on the east.
A major facet of the development plan included closing Michigan

�Community Facilities Component

108

Comprehensive Plan
Avenue through the campus to ensure a pedestrian campus.
Vehicle circulation was examined in terms of access for faculty,
staff and students living off campus. Ease of arrival and departure
and parking for public events on campus were also considered.
Western Michigan University's present enrollment totals 19,000
full-time students. The university expects no significant growth
during the coming years. The Board of Trustees revised housing
policies two years ago to allow all students the choice of living on
or off campus.
Kalamazoo College, on the other hand, requires its students to
reside on campus with few exceptions. Kalamazoo College
Trustees maintain an on-campus housing capacity maximum of
1,375 students. The 1975-76 enrollment totalled 1,496 students.
With the possible exception of a parking ramp, Kalamazoo
College anticipates no expansion south of Lovell Street. The
college would like to develop perimeter parking. If property
could be acquired, Kalamazoo College would like to construct a
parking lot between West Michigan Avenue and the Amtrak line.
The college is also interested in closing one of its campus streets,
e.g., Academy, Carmel or Catherine.
In terms of capital improvements, Kalamazoo College plans to
rebuild its gymnasium on one of two alternative sites: 1) rebuild
on same site with Catherine Street closed, or 2) build on the
corner of Academy and Catherine Streets. An expansion of the
college's library is envisioned for 1980-85. The college would like
to add two more tennis courts if Carmel Street were to be closed.
The school's heating system may also be changed.
Nazareth College proposes no physical development through
1990. The only change it foresees will be the Dillon Hall senior
citizens complex. The 1975 enrollment totaled 457 students. The
1990 enrollment projection totals 700 students.
Recommendations
Primary and Secondary Schools

The school facilities recommendations consist of general
statements regarding site acquisition, new buildings, additions,
improvements, and abandonments. Because of the reduced
enrollment trends, specific recommendations are also made on
possible redevelopment of phased-out schools. These alternatives
include residential development, park-playground, neighborhood,
social or health service centers, and other compatible uses. Each
alternative is qualified by its compatibility with residential areas
and possible traffic implications. During recent years, the busing
of students to achieve racial balance in the schools has caused
the reevaluation of the neighborhood school as an activity or
social center for the immediate residential area. The degree to
which the neighborhood school continues to serve as a community

�Community Facilities Component

109

City of Kalamazoo
focal point will be determined by cooperative programming for
the school facility by school board, municipal departments, and
other agencies for school use. The report encourages year-round
use of schools, especially for recreation, special education, and
preschool and summer school programs as means to retain
neighborhood identification.
Institutions of Higher Education

Recommendations concerning Western Michigan University and
the area colleges emphasize continued coordination and
cooperation between those institutions and the City of Kalamazoo.
Major development on any of the campuses affects surrounding
neighborhoods and city operations. Similarly, changes planned
by the city may affect the campuses. It is therefore recommended
that these matters of mutual interest be cooperatively developed.

Cultural/Fine Arts Amenities

The cultural/fine arts amenities portion of the community facilities
analysis inventories the range of amenities available in Kalamazoo.
The goal of this report is to encourage continued development
and expansion of the fine arts amenities through analysis of
present offerings and projections of expansion or reduction of
services.

Scope

The analysis of current cultural/fine arts amenities covers three
categories:
1 theaters/ auditoriums
2 art galleries
3 museums
Only those organizations which can be classified as nonprofit are
included. Profit-making associations involved in the fine arts are
considered to be business establishments.

Recommendations

The abundance of cultural/fine arts amenities in Kalamazoo
represents a strong, positive force for attracting people and
business to the community. Another benefit is the increased
stabilization of neighborhoods because of public reinvestment
in the area.
Expansion of these amenities is encouraged, as they .are assets
to the urban environment. The primary recommendation is for
coordination of expansion efforts which would lessen the negative
conditions restricting growth and, also, the possible adverse
effects resulting from further development. Traffic generation and
parking problems are foreseen as possible conflicts to be resolved.
Reutilization of vacant school buildings for the housing of fine arts
amenities is also recommended.

�,;
.,...

..

.

:'

'
\

...

·.

~

·--~

.

...

- '11

t

l .. --' ... :f,,
! ...,_;;;;:_

I

:::-::

~

1:_Jl., '
?f'IJ

-

..Jl/f.i1

l-1l

;[!if
rtllf/J

I

4

,...

~.

'

..,,
(' '

\.

. ~ ... w

)

'

~L. ~ij\11;

Proposed South Mall project

'

._

/;;'

�Community Facilities Component

111

City of Kalamazoo
Fire Stations and Travel Distances
Figure20

I\

---r-1 i. I

-1-~I.... -amo

TwJ

Oshtemo Twp

I

Cooper Tw~R,chland Twp

toper Twp

azoo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

Comstock Tw

... I
I
I

---~---Oshtemo Twp
Texas Twp

I

Kalamazoo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I

Comstock Twp

--- ►--r;:.r:e
I

I Portage Twp

Twp

1..
I
--, I
\ I

I
Fire Stations

Proposed, Pending Final Evaluation
One Mile Travel Distance
One and One-Half Mile Travel Distance

tJ

Pavilion Twp

I

I
I

�Community Facilities Component

112

Comprehensive Plan
Library Facilities
Figure21

I TwJLper
amo

-

Twp

_.i:;_~ .... - I
Oshterno Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

l\

-- --Cooper Twp

I

Richland Twp

Comstock T

U.s IJ? 6 A.

---~--Oshtemo Twp

Texas Twp

I

l~r

Kalamazoo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I

Comstock Twp

-•-I-!"--•
I

I Portage Twp

Portage Twp

r-lI

I

'I

I
\ I

~-----+----+-----+---+-- - - ,

Possible
Existing
One-Half and One-Mile Travel Radii
1 Main Library
2 Powell Branch
3 Washington Square Branch
4 Eastwood Branch
5 Oshtemo Branch

tJ

Pavilion Twp

II

I

�Community Facilities Component

113
----------- -----

City of Kalamazoo

----------------------

Health Care Facilities
Figure 22

1 TwJ

toper Twp

Oshtemo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I\

---r-• i. I

-~-~ .... -,a,,io

I

Cooper Tw~R,chland Twp
zoo Twp

I

Comstock Tw

.. I

I

I
.,
:,

---~--Oshtemo Twp

Texas Twp

I

Kalamazoo Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I

Comstock Twp

I
---►--·

' r II

I Portage Twp

Po,tage Twp

I
Bronson Hospital
County Health Department
Family Health Center
Borgess Hospital
State Hospital

l.....
I
--, I
\ I

tJ

Pavilion fwp

I

�Community Facilities Component

114

Comprehensive Plan
Kalamazoo Public School District
Figure23

US-131

OAKLAND

DOUGLAS

SC

a:
u

0

WESTN~DGE

BURDICK
LOVER 'S LANE

PORTAGE

.-

RIVERVIEW OR

L--SPR INKLE

z

-

~

;:;

Kalamazoo City Limits
School District Boundaries

...

&lt;I)

&lt;t
w

�Community Facilities Component

115

City of Kalamazoo
School Locations
Figure24

I\

-~-~----I

lamo

TwJ Lper Twp

OsMcmo Twp

I

---r-•
Cooper Tw~Richland Twp
Twp

Kalamazoo Twp

I

..

Comstock Tw

I

I

■ 24

---~--Oshtemo Twp
Texas Twp

---~--'I II
1rr

I

Kalamazoo Twp

Kalamazoo Twr,

I Portage Twp

Portage Twp

I
Elementary Schools

1-23 Ele!T'entary Schoois

Junior High Schools

1- 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11 to 23 years old
Arcadia
Oakwood
Winchell
Indian Prairie
Northglade
Spring Valley
Greenwood
Chime
Westwood

10-15
10
11
12
13
14
15

34 to 49 years old
Lakewood
Brucker
Burke Acres
Woodrow Wilson
South Westnedge
West Main

Senior High Schools
and Community Education
Center
Special School Facilities
Private Schools

--,, I
II
a.J
16-23
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

51 to 54 years old
Vine
McKinley
Edison
Parkwood
Lincoln
Milwood
Woodward
Washington

24-28
24
25
26
27
28

Junior High Schools
Milwood
HIiiside
Northeastern
Oakwood
South

I

Comstock r wp_

I Pav•l,on 1wp·

I

29-30 Senior High Schools
29 Central
30 Loy Norrix
31-33
31
32
33

Special School Facilities
J. F. Kennedy
lake Side
Upjohn Center

34 Community Education Center

�Community Facilities Component

116

Comprehensive Plan
Institutions of Higher Education
Figure 25

a

s"

z

"'&lt;

0

Western Michigan University
Kalamazoo College
Nazareth College
Kalamazoo Valley Community College

�Community Facilities Component

118

Comprehensive Plan
Kalamazoo Area School Enrollment Trends
Table 11

Non-Public School Enrollment

Public School Enrollment
Year

1962
1963

1964
1965
--1966

1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
-----1974
1975
--- - - 1976

Percent
Change

Annual
Change

Number

17,676

18,018
-----18,097
18,378
18,997
19,150
18,908
18,782
17,908
16,812
15,978
--15,473
15,168
14,551
14,119

342
79
281
619
153
---

Annual
Change

Percent
Change

1962

4,961

1963
1964
1965
1966
1967

165
5,126
5,421
295
-----118
5,303
-135
5,168
-312
4,856

3.3

Number

Year

1.9
0.4
1.6
3.40.8

5.8

-2.2
-2.5
-6.0

-5.1
4,610
-246
1968
-403
-8.7
1969
4,207
-2.6
-108
1970
4,099
-0.5
4,078
-21
1971
-3.9
-161
1972
3,917
-- · ----261
-6.7
1973
3,656
-----4.0
1974
-148
3,508
1975
5
3,513
+.001
- - - - -- - -· +
1976
Not available as of 12-76

-1.3
-242
-0.7
-126
-874
-4.7
-1,096
-6.1
-834
-5.0
----505
-3.2
-2.0
-305
-4.0
-617
- ---3.0
-432

Source: Table by Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Inc., based on data supplied
by the Kalamazoo Public School Administration. Updated by the
Kalamazoo Planning Division, December, 1976

Note: Does not include special
education students.

1976 Enrollment by Public School Type
Table 12
Elementary School
Junior High School
Senior High School

--TOTAL

Note: Does not include special
education students.

Students

Percent

7,831
3,144
3,144
--- 14,119

- 55.50
- -

22.25
22.25
100.00

-----

Source: Table by Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Inc., based on data supplied
by the Kalamazoo Public School Administration. Updated by the
Kalamazoo Planning Division, December, 1976

--- -

Projected Kalamazoo Area School Enrollment Trends
Table 13
1975

Total Public School and
Non-Public Enrollment
Public School Enrollment
Elementary School
·---Junior High School
Senior High School
Non-Public School Enrollment

18,100
14,800
7,990
- - -3,550
3,260
3,300

1980

-

16,800
13,800
7,460
-3,310
-- 3,030
3,000

1985

1990

1995

15,800
13,000
7,020
3,120
2,860

16,100
13,200
7,130
3,170
2,900

17,200
14,100
7,620
3,380
3,100

2,800

2,900

-

3,100

Source: Table by Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated, based on data
supplied by the Kalamazoo Public School Administration, August, 1975

-

�...

~

Community Facilities Component

119
----

City of Kalamazoo
-

-

Elementary School Inventory

Table 14
Schools
11 to 23 Years Old
Arcadia
Oakwood
Winchell
Indian Prairie
Northglade
Spring Valley
Greenwood
Chime
Westwood

Median

Age ol
Building
(Years)

Age of
Newest
Addition

11

6

n.a.

n.a.

16
17
18
19
21
22
23
18.5

10

15
3
1
9
8

Site Size
(Acres)

Building
Size
(Sq. Ft.)

Number Average
of
Classroom
ClassSize
(Sq. Ft.)
rooms

Indoor
Recreation
Area
(Sq. Ft.)

Enrollment
Capacity

2,400
2,400

447
330

10.00
4.53
9.60
12.00
11.84
25.92
8.49
3.59
10.20
10.1

34,000
26,000
22,000
29,000
33,000
29,000

18
15
14
13
13
13
11
10
14
13

780
450
950
n.a.
1,000
750
800
800
800

3.29
11.87
6.86
2.81
8.99
2.28
5.07

23,000
9
36,000 10
21,000 11
35,000 14
47,000 13
-30,000 13
33,000 12

820
900
1,000
700
850
n.a.
850

33,000
29,000
37,000
n.a.

n.a.

Number
Number of
Parking
of
Teachers Spaces

Total
Enrollment

n.a.
n.a.
3,000
2,400
n.a.
2,400
2,400

447
40
20
316
13
22
-- 13
n.a. 349
28
13
50
350 350
12
30
400 341
390 319
13 n.a.
20
390 261
9
300 213
12 n.a.
450 357
14
90
---13
30
390 345

n.a.
4,150
2,400
2,440
2,925
2,400
2,440

300
300
330
350
400
750
333

n.a.

Schools
34 to 49 Years Old
37
43
44
Burke Acres
-Woodrow Wilson
46
South Westnedge
48
West'Main
49
- - -Median
45
Lakewood

Brucker

10
6
8
21
14
10

172
233
260
272
344
300
266

7

95
14
10
14
-12
11

n.a.
23
29
25
0
18
24

Schools
51 to 54 Years Old
Vine
McKinley
Edison
Parkwood
Lincoln
Milwood
Woodward
Washington

Median

51
51
52
53
53
54
54
54
53

12
35
6

19
6
28
14
12
13

39,000
2.26
2.73
40,000
7.36
72,000
-- -32,000
2.33
177,000
6.98
21.00
28,000
57,000
9.60
3.40
54,000
5.19
56,000

21
n.a.
10
n.a.
20
800
12
690
-n.a.
52
30
875
27
n.a.
23
700
750
22

2,400 630 360
2,400 308 252
n.a. 500 410
--2,320 425 357
n.a. 700 531
2,400 750 551
n.a. 650 456
4,400 700 503
2,400 640 433

14
11
-

30
16

-

n.a.

n.a.

13

12

---

n.a. n.a.
-- -

27 100
---27
43
26
41
20
36

Source : Table by Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Inc., August, 1975, based on
data supplied by the Kalamazoo Public School Administration

�Community Facilities Component

120

Comprehensive Plan
Junior High School and High School Inventory
Table 15
Schools
Junior High
Milwood
Hillside
Northeastern
Oakwood
South

Number
of
Classrooms

Aver•£•
Clossroom
Size
(Sq. Ft.)

Indoor
Recreation
ArH
(Sq. Ft.)

Ago of
Age of
BulldinE Newest Site Size
(Years)
Addition (Acres)

Building
SIN

16
17
22
23
25

128,000
38
100,000
30
80,000
27
-78,000
20
140,000
40

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

303,000
321,000

n.a.
n.a.

27

21.45
20.25
9
-15.11
9
21

(Sq. Ft.)

n.a.
625
742

n.a.

---

6,000
5,000

Enrollment
Capacity

Total
Enrollment

900
832
950
862
557
600
------ 600
600
1,200
742

Number
Number of
of
Parkin&amp;
Teachers Spaces

275
156

45
43
29
33
45

n.a.

83
85

1,000
700

80
120

High Schools

Central
3
------Loy Norrix
15

-

4

61.84
55

77
73

10,000
12,000

2,200
2,200

1,667
1,586

Source: Table by Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Inc., August, 1975, based on
data supplied by the Kalamazoo Public School Administration

���Utilities Component

125

City of Kalamazoo
Provision for adequate utilities is an important criterion for any
active and vital community. Every citizen is directly concerned
with electricity, gas, telephone, water and sewage disposal as
basic to daily life. The growth of any community is dependent
upon these services.
Because the provision of water, storm drainage and sewage
treatment systems are under direct public control, they form the
principal elements of the Comprehensive Plan's Utility Component.
Semi-public utility systems, such as electricity, gas, and telephone
are planned, primarily, by each of the respective companies
serving the Kalamazoo area. Before action is taken to modify
current systems, however, proposed plans are extensively
coordinated with those of all local governments within the affected
area.
The purpose of the Utility Component of the Comprehensive Plan
is to describe Kalamazoo's existing systems and examine some
of the major problems now being observed. This process, because
of its technical nature, requires a close working relationship with
the city's utility departments. The City of Kalamazoo is fortunate
that ongoing utility-planning activities are maintained by both the
Water and Public Works Departments. This has helped to facilitate
specific problem evaluation and to recommend solutions based
on available resources.
The "Comprehensive Plan" accepts the expansion and extension
of Kalamazoo's utility systems, as outlined in the "Fifty-Year Water
Utility Management Plan" of 1975; the "Master Plan of Storm
Drainage", 1976; and the "201 Segmented Facilities Plan, Volume
I, City of Kalamazoo", 1976. Recognizing that expansion and
extension of the utility systems will increase the development
potential outside the city, however, the Comprehensive Plan also
encourages an areawide commitment to maintaining the City of
Kalamazoo as a vital urban center in terms of residential,
commercial, and industrial growth. This commitment should be
reinforced at every opportunity in the interaction between
Kalamazoo and adjacent local governments. To this end, it is
recommended that when the city considers utility improvements
that benefit areas outside the city, consideration should also be
given to the willingness of those areas to undertake cooperative
actions. Such actions include: 1) cooperating in planning for the
use and impact of the utility on all areas served, 2) aiding the city
in solving potential problems connected with utility improvements,
and 3) equitable sharing of the costs of constructing and using
the improved utility services.
Water Utility Element

All of the water used domestically or for other purposes in the
Kalamazoo urban area is ground water. The water supply system
is managed principally by the cities of Kalamazoo, Parchment and
Portage.

�Utilities Component

126

Comprehensive Plan
The City of Kalamazoo's service area includes the city and,
through franchise agreements, several surrounding areas,
including the townships of Kalamazoo (excluding the City of
Parchment), Comstock, Cooper, Oshtemo, Richland, and Texas,
and a portion of the City of Portage north of 1-94 and Branch
Creek. The entire area, currently, is not being serviced (refer to
Figure 26). Both Parchment and Portage operate water systems
within their corporate limits.
Scope

The entire water system is an integrated whole made up of well
fields (source of supply), pumping stations, storage reservations,
booster-bleeder stations, and distribution piping systems that link
all the components. Kalamazoo's service area is divided into 5
pressure districts (see Figure 27). Within these districts, the city
operates 20 pumping stations and 5 storage tanks. At present,
water is supplied from 104 deep wells, grouped in 21 well fields.
It is distributed through an extensive network of pipelines ranging
in size from 2 inches to 30 inches, at an average pressure of 55
pounds per square inch (psi) with a range of 35 psi to 110 psi.
Replacement needs in this distribution system exist, for the most
part, in the Low Service District and, particularly, in the Central
Business District (CBD), as shown in Figure 28. A program for
upgrading in the Low Service District is proposed. The upgrading
and replacement program should be scheduled with other public
works projects, such as street widening and/ or relocation and
sewer construction. In addition, coordination with any major
private construction should be sought.
An appraisal of all aspects of the present pumping operation has
been made. The appraisal was conducted in light of proposed
capacities, so that programs could be formulated in response to
identification of deficiencies.

Treatment

The raw water is treated at each of the pumping stations with
applications of chlorine, fluoride, and sodium hexametaphosphate.
Sodium hexametaphosphate is used to sequester the iron present
in Kalamazoo's water. The treatment method differs from most
municipal water systems in that Kalamazoo does not have a single
water source or treatment plant. This is not seen as a problem,
due to proposed automatic controls now being tried on an
experimental basis to determine effectiveness.

Usage and Resources

A simplied summary of the past development of service and
volume is delineated below:

1925
45,000
Number of Customers
11,050
Miles of Main in Service 118.5
·Average Day M.G.D.,.
4.4
-

-

Population Served

-

Maximum Day M.G.D.
*Million Gallons Per Day

1950
65,000
17,270
215.9
9.6
18.3

1975
115,000
29,300
439.0
18.1
40.0

�Utilities Component

127

City of Kalamazoo
All existing well fields have been extensively tested to determine
their ultimate sustainable annual yield, as well as Peak Daily
Pumping Capacity. These determine the practical supply limits
within the Kalamazoo City and Township area.
Wells are generally in good condition by present standards. All
are located and constructed to meet Michigan Health Department
standards and are given frequent, careful maintenance. The well
field environment has, in several cases, been given strong
protection, such as the Al Sabo Land Preserve Land Use
Ordinance and the Sanitary Control Ordinance for the central
pumping station well field.
Recommendations

The Fifty Year Water Utility Management Plan is not a physical
plan in the traditional sense; it is, instead, a management plan:
a tool for problem solving. The report was prepared by the Water
Department to define the interrelationships among the variables
that affect the growth and development of the City of Kalamazoo
Water Utility.
The plan is a model of the growth that will probably occur in the
next 50 years. The recommendations included in the plan,
therefore, are made for a series of pdtential alternatives rather
than for a specific course of action. The plan highlights future
questions and points out the problems which must be solved in
the near future.
Those areas considered are:

1 Pumping (adequate pressure)
2 Purity and quality
3 Quality and Quantity (firefighting)

4 Commercial service (meter readers, billing)
5 Business management

6 Planning (extension of service)
7 Maintenance of existing system
8 Provision of service to new customers
9 Expansion of water service for long-term needs
There is no conflict between the Fifty Year Water Management
Plan and the proposed elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
The flexibility expressed by the Utility Element will meet the
various projected demands of population and land use.

�Utilities Component

128

Comprehensive Plan
Coordination between utility planning and community planning
are necessary and, in the future, will help to ensure Kalamazoo's
ideal growth. To this end and for the purposes of ensuring the
quality and quantity of the Kalamazoo water supply designated
as areas of public improvement within the water utility element are
the water recharge areas, water well sites and water pumping
stations.
Storm Drainage Element

The existing storm sewer systems in the older sections of the city
have been installed and functioning for a considerable number
of years. There are large deficiencies throughout these systems.
In spite of the small capacities and large deficiencies, these
systems have, to a degree, been performing their function by
removing storm water before massive flooding occurs.

Scope

The Master Plan of Storm Drainage of the City of Kalamazoo,
Michigan, prepared by Jones and Henry Engineers Limited, was
presented to the City of Kalamazoo in April, 1976. The study and
its recommendations cover analysis, design, proposed
construction and cost estimates of the plan components. The study
provides data essential to determining the nature of future
drainage plans.

There are many areas in Kalamazoo in a state of transition to
apartment, manufacturing or commercial land use. In the Jones
and Henry study, the following assumptions were made:
1 Total transition by new construction to a land use with a high
percentage of impervious surface may never occur.
2 The present trend in urban land management is to allow for
significant open space and pervious surfaces in the development
of apartment and manufacturing complexes.
3 The high rates of runoff from impervious surfaces to a storm
sewer system can be controlled by the use of short duration,
on-site storage of runoff.
As a result, the values selected were intermediate between
present land use and zoned land use with considerable weight
being given to present land use characteristics.
The purpose of the comprehensive plan for storm drainage in
Kalamazoo is to enable the city to schedule, design, and construct
future projects in an orderly and integrated manner.
The report includes:
1 A basis of design for the various components of the drainage
system;
2 An analysis of the various existing storm sewer systems showing
capacities and identifying deficiencies;

�Utilities Component

129

City of Kalamazoo
3 Proposed facilities to alleviate existing deficiencies and to provide
for future development; and
4 Cost estimate of the proposed facilities.
This information is crucial to the Comprehensive Plan and its
components. Damage from storm water runoff may pose a hazard
to existing and future land uses. The land use component must
reflect a knowledge and understanding of the hazards of storm
water drainage. The Master Plan of Storm Drainage identifies
areas needing correction and improvement.
Storm Sewers/Design

A detailed analysis was made of all existing storm sewers not
studied and reported by Jones and Henry in 1957 and 1959.
A careful study was then made of the most economical method to
achieve relief. Existing sewers were considered to be adequate if
the hydraulic grade line (water surface elevation) remained below
the ground surface elevation during the design storm. Relief
sewers were sized and located to make maximum use of the
capacity of the existing sewers.
The existing local storm sewers and the proposed relief sewers
will be adequate for a five-year storm event. There is no surplus
capacity designed into the systems. More intense storms may
cause local, short-duration ponding of surface runoff. Cost
estimates of proposed relief sewers are presented in the
discussion of each of the various storm sewer systems in the city.

Stream Capacity

A detailed analysis was made of the major streams conveying
surface runoff through the city with the exception of the
Kalamazoo River. Design flows and proposed improvements for
these streams were determined for a 100-year storm event. There
is a separate section in the report for Arcadia Creek, Axtell Creek,
Portage Creek, Davis Creek and Spring Valley. Most of the area
tributary to these streams is outside the city. Future storm flows
from these areas to and through the city will increase as
urbanization occurs. Methods to control the magnitude of these
increases are discussed in the report.

Stream Rechanneling

Projects of stream rechanneling are proposed for Arcadia and
Portage creeks. The rechanneling is through an underground
conduit that would parallel the ConRail track north of Kalamazoo
Avenue. The design and timing of construction should take into
account proposed development for the area. Preliminary contacts
have been made with ConRail regarding the amount of time
necessary to procure easements from them, and the time-span
seems to be approximately one year for easement finalization at
this time (see Figure 29).

Recommendations

It is the goal of the Storm Drainage Element to ensure both the
collection and carrying of drainage waters to adequate outlets,

�Utilities Component

130

Comprehensive Plan
and the appropriate retention of storm water to minimize flooding.
Because of the nature of storm water collection in the Kalamazoo
area, it is recommended that any implementation of the Master
Plan for Storm Drainage be coordinated with adjacent local units
of government. Additional recommendations center specifically
on construction of sewers of sufficient size to handle runoff,
including relief sewers and on-site storage in new construction,
where necessary. Maintenance and improvement of natural water
courses through retention facilities, cleaning and rechanneling
are also encouraged.
Wastewater Treatment Element

The first step toward meeting the water pollution control need of
the Kalamazoo Metropolitan Area is the preparation of a facilities
plan. The purpose of such a plan is to identify the specific needs
in the area and to recommend the most cost-effective means of
satisfying them for the duration of the planning period. The
Segmented Facilities Plan covers the collection system
requirements and some improvements to the treatment plant that
would be required regardless of the ultimate utilization/ disposal
system selected. The planning period for this study is assumed to
extend to the year 2000.
The planning area, as delineated by the State of Michigan in
consultation with representatives from the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and local officials, encompasses an area of
approximately 505 square miles in Southwestern Michigan.
Included in the planning area are the Cities of Kalamazoo,
Portage, Parchment, and Galesburg; the Villages of Augusta,
Climax and Richland; the Townships of Alamo, Charleston, Climax,
Comstock, Cooper, Kalamazoo, Oshtemo, Pavilion, Richland, Ross
and Texas in Kalamazoo County; and the townships of Barry and
Prairieville in Barry County (see Figure 30 ).
Because the planning area is large, the segmented facilities plan
is divided into several volumes, each of which contains the
detailed information on a particular political jurisdiction. Volume
1 specifically deals with the City of Kalamazoo. Much of the
background information, applicable to the entire planning area,
is contained in Volume 1 of the facilities plan and many of the
conclusions of separate portions of the Facilities Plan are
summarized in Volume 1.
The conclusions of this study constitute a master plan by which
the area can plan a pollution abatement program. The study has
been conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA regulations to
permit federal funding of the design and construction of the
recommended facilities under Public Law 92-500.

Scope

As a result of long-term contracts, the City of Kalamazoo is
obligated to operate wastewater treatment facilities serving the
cities of Galesburg and Portage and the townships of Comstock,

�Utilities Component

131

City of Kalamazoo
Kalamazoo, Oshtemo, and Texas. The City of Parchment operates
a separate system. Within the City of Kalamazoo, Allied Paper
Company operates a treatment facility.
Efforts to provide adequate sanitary sewer facilities in the
Kalamazoo area began in 1881 with the construction of the first
sanitary sewers in the Village of Kalamazoo. Since then there has
been extensive expansion and improvement of sewer facilities in
the city.
Existing System

The existing wastewater treatment facilities of the City of
Kalamazoo include primary and secondary treatment with
phosphorus removal. The treatment process at the Kalamazoo
plant differs from that of most municipal wastewater plants in that
the secondary treatment phase processes approximately twice
the total volume of the procured flow in the primary phase. Waste
from several paper companies receive primary treatment at the
source and the effluent from this treatment is conveyed by means
of an industrial sewer to the Kalamazoo plant. At this point the
industrial waste joins the city's primary treatment waste stream.
Both streams receive secondary treatment and phosphorus
removal prior to being discharged into the Kalamazoo River. The
original Kalamazoo sewage treatment plant was completed in
1955 and has a design capacity of 34 million gallons per day (mgd)
with a maximum capacity of 70 mgd. Current flows are estimated
at32 mgd.
The Kalamazoo River downstream from Kalamazoo is designated
for tolerant warm water fish. The minimum daily average of
dissolved oxygen (do) under this designation is 5.0 milligrams per
liter (mg/I), and no single do volume may be less than 4.0 mg/I.
Presently, the river does not meet water quality standards. The
present draft NPDES Permit proposes to restrict the maximum
daily discharges during the summer to 10 mg/I biochemical
oxygen demand (bod) and 2.0 mg/I ammonia (nh3-n). During the
winter the restriction is 30 mg/ I bod. The average monthly
discharge of suspended solids (ss) is limited to 10 mg/I and 30
mg/I during the summer and winter respectively. Phosphorus
concentrations are not to exceed 1.0 mg/I.

Projected Demand

Approximately 53.3 mgd of wastewaters are expected to require
treatment in the year 2000. The wastes will consist of about 15
mgd of paper mill flows and 38.3 mgd of domestic and
miscellaneous commercial and industrial wastes. The plant will
receive flows from the Cities of Galesburg, Parchment and
Portage; from the Villages of Augusta, Richland and Vicksburg;
and from the Townships of Alamo, Charleston, Comstock, Cooper,
Kalamazoo, Oshtemo, Pavilion, Richland, Ross, Texas, Barry and
Prairieville. Both the Village of Climax and Climax Township are
expected to remain without sewers.

�Utilities Component

132

Comprehensive Plan
The paper mill wastes are expected to contain about 250 mg/ I ss
and 200 mg/I bod. The remaining wastes are expected to contain
approximately 280 mg/I ss and 380 mg/I bod. The total loading
to the plant will average about 120,700 lbs. ss and 146,400 lbs. bod.
Recommendations

The segmented facilities plan covers the installation of sewers to
serve presently unserved areas, construction of relief interceptor
sewers, infiltration/inflow analysis, construction of pumping,
preliminary and primary treatment facilities, as well as the
addition of final clarifier capacity at the existing plant.
The Comprehensive Plan accepts the proposed segmented
facilities plan; recognizing, however, that areawide coordination
is necessary to implementation. The plan recommends, therefore,
that commitment to maintaining the City of Kalamazoo as a vital
urban center be reinforced at every opportunity in any action
between Kalamazoo and adjacent local governments. It also
recommends that the impact of the extension of any service line
be fully assessed, and solutions to potential problems be
cooperatively sought by all areas served.

''

The Comprehensive Plan further recommends that research be
continued to determine appropriate uses for solid waste residue
and components of wastewater treatment.

Semi-Public Utilities

Electricity

The Electric Division of Consumers Power Company provides the
chief source of electrical power for the Kalamazoo area. Power is
supplied through a series of fossil fuel and nuclear generating
plants located in this region. The Consumers Power system has a
capacity of two million KW minimum and four million KW
maximum, and its capacity is expected to be increased in the
near future. Consumer's extension of service is based on a ratio
of cost of construction to anticipated revenue, and the company
feels, at this time, that it would have no trouble meeting
anticipated demand.

Telephone

Telephone service within the Kalamazoo area is provided by the
Michigan Bell Telephone Company. The system's current total
exchange capacity is approximately 90,000 units. This estimate
includes residential, business, and coin-operated phones, in
addition to Centrex and Watts leased lines. Demand is projected
to increase by an additional 30,000 units by the early 1990's. The
company expects to have little difficulty in meeting this demand,
if economic conditions remain favorable for such expansion.

Natural Gas

Natural gas service is furnished through the Kalamazoo area by
Consumers Power Company. As a result of the recent energy
crisis and the ever-increasing demand for gas service, Consumers
has received federal permission to limit the consumption of
natural gas. Consumers now has the right to refuse service to new

�Utilities Component
-----

-

--

133

-- - -

City of Kalamazoo
industrial or commercial development, as well as service for
expansion of existing facilities.
Aside from longer-range solutions to the gas shortage, which
involve development of alternative sources of fuel, a short-range
solution for the Kalamazoo area may be reutilization of existing
fuel allocations. Consumer's present policies allow for remodeling
and/ or transfers of allocations of gas use only if the previous loads
are not exceeded and provided the service equipment is operable
and was in use within the previous two years.
At the present time, Consumer's gas usage is restricted to
existing users. No new commercial or industrial accounts or
permits for increased service levels have been issued since April
of 1975.
The gas restrictions are eased somewhat for customers who
operate more than one business, since existing commercial and
industrial customers may transfer their gas service from one
location to another if there is no change in the service level.
Customers requesting a transfer of service must be owners of the
equipment and must maintain an active account.
Commercial and industrial users wishing to reactivate their
existing gas accounts are eligible to do so if the previous account
was deactivated less than two years previously, and provided the
previous service levels are not exceeded.
Consumers will provide gas for new users of existing accounts at
existing service levels if the request is made for a building
presently serviced by Consumers or actively serviced within the
last two years. In light of these current restrictions, it will be
necessary for new commercial and industrial businesses to
utilize alternative energy sources.
-----

Recommendations

---

The Comprehensive Plan encourages coordination between semipublic utilities and local governments prior to modification of
existing systems. The plan recommends that underground
telephone and electric lines be used in new developments. In
addition, it is recommended that in view of the current energy
crisis, an area-wide energy conservation program be instituted,
which would promote maximum utilization of existing resources
like natural gas.

�Utilities Glossary

134

Comprehensive Plan
Design Storm, Capacity and Flows storm sewers are usually designed on an assumption that their
capacity will be exceeded an average of once in a certain number
of years. It then becomes a problem of design to choose the
number of years, the design storm , that will provide sewers of a
size adequate to meet the estimated needs of the area. The flows
to be conveyed by the sewer during the design storm are then
referred to as the design flows.
Infiltration/Inflow

infiltration/inflow is the water in a sanitary sewer system that
should not be there. Infiltration is groundwater while inflow is
generally surface or storm water. It is considered excessive if it is
more economical to eliminate or prevent 1/1 from getting into the
system than it is to convey and treat it.

Interceptor Sewer

a collector sewer that receives water flow from a number of other
sewer mains directing the flow to a point of treatment.

Peak Daily Pumping Capacity

flows through a sanitary sewer are not constant during a 24-hour
period. Certain periods of the day produce flows in excess of the
average and are referred to as peak flows. Pumps are generally
designed with the capacity to pump these peak daily flows in order
to prevent flooding damage to upstream residences and
businesses.

---------

- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Relief Sewer

a sewer built to carry flows that exceed the capacity of an existing
sewer.

Storm Event

local rainfall records provide a history of storms with varying
intensities of rainfall. From these records probable recurrence
intervals can be established for use in designing storm sewers.
For example, in Kalamazoo there is a 20% chance that in any given
year 1.65 inches of rain will fall in one hour. This is referred to as a
5-year storm event or a rainfall predicted to occur 20 times during
a 100-year period.

----- ----

�Proposed commercial office, Michigan Avenue

�Utilities Component

136

Comprehensive Plan
Growth of the Service Area
Figure26

I

I

1925

11111111111

1950

}\:::\\

1975
2020

�Utilities Component

137

City of Kalamazoo
Projected Service Districts
Figure27

A-Low
B-

Intermediate

C-High
D-

East Side High

E-

Super High

�Utilities Component

138

Comprehensive Plan
CBD Water Main Upgrading
Figure28

':;

."""'

+-

:,

MSC

z

..J

&lt;

;:

8 RN.JAM

Existing Mains

•••••

Mains to Be Upgraded
Relocated Mains
Mains to Be Abandoned

�139

Utilities Component

City of Kalamazoo
Kalamazoo, Michigan Storm Drain Report
Location of Proposed Channel Work
Portage Creek and Arcadia Creek
Jones &amp; Henry Engineers, Limited, Toledo, Ohio

Figure29

"'

(.J

i5

"...a:
"'

W MAIN

\

•••:

UNIVERSITY

,

POND AREA

\

.t••••••~

UNIVERSITY.
AREA

''

OIKESLAKE

.....
~

Proposed Channels
Drainage Basin Divide
Sub Area Boundary

•

New Bridge Required

,._

Modify Existing Bridge

a:
:,

"';i

PROPOSED
ARCADIA CREEK
RELIEF DRAIN

�140

Utilities Component

Comprehensive Plan
Figure30

City of Kalamazoo, Michigan Facilities Planning
Wastewater Planning Area
Jones &amp; Henry Engineers, Limited, Toledo, Ohio

���Special Areas of Concern

145

City of Kalamazoo
Population and Employment
Profile

Two studies that are considered preparatory as well as
fundamental to the Land Use Planning process are employment
and population. The former, by analyzing the structure and
vitality of the urban economy, determines the number of
employment opportunities which the economy can support and
provides a means by which the growth potential of the urban area
may be gauged. For this informatioQ to be of value in the land
planning process, however, it must be converted and expressed
in terms of population. A discussion of Kalamazoo's employment
profile as well as its projected population follows.
Two techniques for projecting future population size were used in
Kalamazoo's planning process. The first was based on an
averaging of population projections prepared by the Michigan
Department of State Highways and Transportation, Michigan
Department of the Budget and the W. E. Up john Institute for
Employment Research. These projections and their average appear
in Table 12 entitled Kalamazoo County Population Projections.
Because the projections were initially completed on a county-wide
basis, projected percentages were applied to each municipality.
The resultant projections for the City of Kalamazoo on a five year
increment are shown below.
1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

85,555

87,798

88,852

91,108

92,795

95,415

98,916

Through this approach, 92,795 people can be expected to reside
within the City of Kalamazoo by 1990 representing an 8.5%
increase over 1970 levels.
Technicians applying the various projection techniques for each
of the above mentioned organizations have assumed certain levels
of in-migration. These migration rates imply that persons currently
living outside Kalamazoo will, over the next 15 years, move their
residences to the city as a result of increased educational and/ or
economic opportunities. Interviews with the city's three
institutions of higher education and the area's largest employers,
however, revealed that no significant expansion of either
enrollment or employment were scheduled for the foreseeable
future. Therefore, if area population projections are to be
accurate, in-migration must necessarily be generated by new
sources of opportunity moving into the area. With the existence of
several organizations dedicated to the inducement of new
economic development within Kalamazoo, population projections
based on moderate levels of economic expansion, as are those
mentioned above, may not be unreasonable.
The second population projection technique was based on the
desired development of Kalamazoo's proposed residential land
use plan to its maximum. When this was done, a specific number

�Special Areas of Concern

146

Comprehensive Plan
of persons could utimately be expected to reside within the city.
Briefly, the technique required the conversion of land area targeted
for residential use into a projection of future dwelling units. Once
an estimate of dwelling units was made, this data was further
converted into a projection of future population by applying a
factor specific to the number of persons expected to reside per
dwelling unit. Through use of this methodology, it was determined
that the population holding capacity of the City of Kalamazoo,
given static 1976 boundaries and the characteristics of the
Residential Land Use Plan as currently envisioned, falls within a
projected population range of 101,100 to 102,900 persons. The
projection ranges are based on a low range of 2.39 persons per
household and a high range of 2.61 persons per household.
Individual census tracts may have an average household size
outside of the ranges projected for Kalamazoo. Census tracts with
significant concentrations of single-person households such as
census tracts 6 and 8 may have smaller than average household
sizes while other areas such as Tracts 14.01 and 16.01 generally
have larger average household sizes. Such ranges in household
size indicate areas with differing housing and service demands.
Potentially the largest increases in population will take place in
census tracts 15.05 and 16.02. (A census tract map appears on
Figure 29.) These tracts contain 50% of the City's 1754.13 vacant
acres targeted for residential development as shown in Table 13.
Demands for increased services thus will center on those open
land portions as indicated by census tract. Estimates of future
development have targeted 1,543.84 acres or 88.0% of the total
vacant acreage for low-density residential use. The majority of
the low-density residential development is expected to be in
single-family units although Planned Unit Developments or other
housing forms which meet the intent of the density ranges could
be developed.
Based on net acreage and density changes, an additional 6580
dwelling units are projected for the City of Kalamazoo as depicted
in Table 18. This will constitute a 24.27% increase in the city's
housing supply in comparison to the 1970 Census enumeration of
27,160 dwelling units. Low-density dwelling units dominate the
projected residential development with a net loss in high-density
development. The most significant loss in high-density residential
development is targeted for Census Tracts 2 and 11 where
significant changes in land use are projected. The largest
increases in housing supply will take place in Census Tracts
15.05, 16.02 and 12.
Employment

A major product of a city's industrial development potential is its
ability to attract employment opportunities for its citizens. There
is a cause and effect relationship among the factors of population
growth, growth in industrial development, and the growth in job
opportunities. As industrial development occurs (i.e., as new

.,

�Special Areas of Concern

147

City of Kalamazoo
industry is attracted, thereby absorbing industrially zoned land)
the number of job opportunities increases and growth then occurs
in the city's total population. Present and projected business and
employment growth patterns, then, are indicative of the need for
industrial development and the directions it should take.
The following data analysis highlights some of the economic
indicators that point to industrial development needs in
Kalamazoo. Data for this analysis was provided by the Upjohn
Institute for Employment Research and the Michigan Employment
Security Commission (MESC).
Three major characteristics of the productivity and employment
changes now occurring in Kalamazoo County are potentially
indicative of the direction industrial development is and should
be taking. These characteristics are: 1) the extent to which the
Kalamazoo area is retaining its ability to produce goods and
services for export and local consumption, 2) the extent to which
the area is able to retain its job opportunities, and 3) the nature
of the area's industrial base.
Of the total 1975 labor force in Kalamazoo County, 88,700 people
were employed while the unemployment rate was 8.7%. Inside the
city limits, 37,600 people were e,mployed and the rate of
unemployment was 10.6%. In both the city and county, the
unemployment rate steadily increased between 1970 and 1975
and then began to decline to 9.5% and 7.8% respectively during
the first six months of 1976.
The unemployment rate in the Kalamazoo area fluctuates in the
shortrun with changes in the national and regional economies.
Kalamazoo's gain or loss in the number of jobs available to its
citizens, however, is a more long-term result of the community's
economic health. Between 1960 and 1970, the population of
Kalamazoo County increased by 18.8%. The number of employed
Kalamazoo County residents, however, increased by 26.1 % during
that period. As indicated in Table 19, growth in employment has
increased more rapidly than population growth since 1960.
The rate of employment growth between 1970 and 1975, however,
was less than one-half of the growth recorded in the previous
decade. This occurred primarily because during that period, the
nation suffered its worst recession since the 1930's. In addition,
the difference between population and employment growth rates
has been narrowing since 1950. This largely reflects changes in
the composition of our population; a greater proportion of
Kalamazoo's residents is of working age today than in the 1950's.
Kalamazoo is continuing to increase its employment
opportunities but at a slower pace than in the past, and at a
decreasing ratio to population growth since 1960. *

�148

Special Areas of Concern

Comprehensive Plan
Overall Economic Development
Program

Federal legislation and local initiative prompted the creation of
an Overall Economic Development Program (OEDP) for
Kalamazoo County. The OEDP planning process is designed "to
create employment opportunities, foster more stable and
diversified local economies, improve local conditions, and provide
a mechanism for guiding and coordinating the efforts of local
individuals and organizations concerned with the economic
development of their area.''
Expected to be submitted to the federal government in 1977, the
OEDP document will outline strategies for development action for
Kalamazoo County on a prioritized basis. It will also provide the
basis for meeting the legal criteria that public works and business
development projects funded by the federal Economic
Development Administration (EDA) be consistent with an
approved overall program for the economic development of the
area. One of the prerequisites for official designation of an area
as targeted for redevelopment is EDA approval of the OEDP.
Approval of the annual OEDP by EDA continues the area's
eligibility for program benefits provided under the Public Works
and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended.
An ad hoc committee of local city and county officials as well as
representatives of business, industry, finance, agriculture, the
professions, organized labor, utilities, education, public health
agencies, racial or ethnic minorities and the unemployed or underemployed are developing the Kalamazoo County OEDP.
The OEDP document is submitted on an annual basis. However, it
must include a minimum two year action program to facilitate
necessary cooperation and federal assistance. It is intended that
the impact of such a development plan will have a positive effect
on the local economy.
*Kalamazoo's ability to produce goods and services for export
and local consumption, and the nature of its industrial base are
not summarized here. See the Industrial Land Use Technical
Report for a discussion of these concerns.

Population &amp; Employment Glossary
Holding Capacity

Industrial Absorption

------ -- - - ---- -------in terms of population, desired development of proposed
residential land use to its maximum.

- - - -- -----------see industrial land use glossary.

�149

Special Areas of Concern

City of Kalamazoo
Citizen Involvement

The structure and method of citizen participation outlined here
has been accepted by the Planning Commission as an integral
part of the planning process for the forseeable future. It assumes
continual dialogue between citizens, the Planning Commission,
and the Planning Division staff. This outline clearly pinpoints the
major organizational components of citizen involvement, the
channels of communication between citizens and city government,
and the nature of citizen activity in the planning process. Citizen
input is provided by both individual residents and organized
groups using these channels of communication and engaging in
the activities outlined in this statement.
The comprehensive planning process is divided into three
interrelated phases. The first phase consists of creating the
Comprehensive Plan (now completed with this document) and
updating it at regular intervals. The second phase consists of
special area planning specific to neighborhood needs and goals.
Phase three includes the development of specific tools and
techniques for implementation.

Organizational Components

The Comprehensive Plan
The following groups have been involved and will continue to be
involved in this phase of the planning process:
1 The City Planning Commission functioning as both an official
planning body and a citizen advisory body to the City Commission.
2 The Joint Neighborhood Council functioning as an umbrella
organization made up of participating neighborhood
organizations. The JNC's function is to express the concerns of
all neighborhoods and to help coordinate neighborhood activities,
particularly those related to planning.
3 Organized neighborhood groups functioning to represent
neighborhood residents in the planning process.
4 Business, labor, institutional and professional organizations
functioning as representatives of special concerns in the city.

Channels of Communication

Four channels of communication expedite citizen-city contact in
the planning process:
1 Direct contact with Planning Division staff and Planning
Commission members.
2 Formal liaisons between citizen organizations and Planning
Commission members (and Planning staff).
3 Informal public meetings either sponsored by the Planning
Commission and/or Planning staff, or requested by citizen groups.

�Special Areas of Concern

150

Comprehensive Plan
4 Formal Planning Commission public hearings to allow final citizen
input prior to official action.
Citizen Activities

The kinds of citizen participation include:
1 Voicing neighborhood concerns and desires and recommending
goals and courses of action.
2 Reviewing and commenting on the preliminary Summary of the
Comprehensive Plan adopted in January, 1977.
3 Reviewing and commenting on the final Plan prior to adoption.
4 Reviewing and/or initiating subsequent changes in the
Comprehensive Plan.

Special Area and
Neighborhood Planning

Organizational Components and Channels of Communication

The organizational components and communication channels
described above will be utilized during this second phase of the
planning process.
Citizen Activities

Citizen participation will include the following activities:
1 Aiding in the determination of neighborhood and special area
goals and objectives.
2 Aiding the planning staff in surveying present neighborhood
conditions.
3 Aiding the Planning Commission and staff in keeping citizens
informed as to progress.
4 Aiding in the coordination of special area and neighborhood
planning among all areas of the city.
5 Reviewing and commenting on special area and neighborhood
plans prior to adoption.

Development of Implementation
Techniques

Organizational Components

In this phase two additional citizen bodies will be included in the
organizational structure utilized in the first two phases of the
planning process:
1 Citizen Advisory Boards
The City Commission has created numerous citizen advisory
bodies to give advice concerning city operations and policies.

�Special Areas of Concern

151

City of Kalamazoo
The development of implementation techniques will require the
participation of these bodies in the planning process.
2 Community Development Act Ad Hoc Advisory Committee
This citizen organization must be included in the implementation
planning phase because of its function in regard to Community
Development Block Grant funding.
Channels of Communication

The channels of communication utilized in the first two phases
will also be used in this phase of the planning process. In addition,
direct contacts between citizen and city boards, commissions and
administrative departments provided by ordinance or
administrative procedure will be maintained.

Citizen Activities

Citizen activities in the implementation phase include:
1 Voicing concerns before city advisory boards and commissions.
2 Voicing concerns about implementation priorities, the techniques
to be used, and funding.
3 Reviewing and commenting on the impact of implementing the
Comprehensive Plan and special area/neighborhood plans.
4 Continuing the planning dialogue that now exists between citizens
and the Planning Commission and staff.

Required Comprehensive Plan
Reassessment

The Comprehensive Plan and all special area and neighborhood
plans must be reassessed at regular intervals not to exceed five
years. The purpose of this reassessment is to update planning in
light of changing conditions and attitudes in the community. It is
the desire of the Planning Commission to insure that active citizen
participation is incorporated in the reassessment process.

�152

Special Areas of Concern

Comprehensive Plan
Historic Preservation
Consideration Statement

The City of Kalamazoo is engaged in an active program of historic
preservation. It has established an Historical Commission and an
Historic District Commission, both of which are pursuing the city's
goal to make historic preservation an essential part of community
development.

Historic District Commission

South Street Historic District I Among the projects which the
city has undertaken to preserve Kalamazoo's history is the
establishment of the South Street Historic District. Homes within
the district display classic examples of late nineteenth century
architectural design, and all are subject to special codes
regarding their exteriors. The Historic District Commission is the
regulatory body enforcing those codes.
Stuart-Woodward Area Historic District/The Stuart-Woodward
neighborhood displays an architectural quality similar to that of
South Street. This district is subject to the same code regulations
as the South Street Historic District and is monitored by the same
Historic District Commission.

Historical Commission

As of February 10, 1976, four structures in Kalamazoo are listed
in the National Register of Historic Places:
1 Michigan Central Depot 459 Burdick Street
2 Kalamazoo State Hospital Water Tower Oakland Drive
3 Ladies Library Association Building 333 South Park Street
4 Charles E. Stuart House 427 Stuart Avenue
The Kalamazoo Ladies Library Association has already undergone
restoration with the use of funds from the Michigan History
Division and the American Revolution Bicentennial Committee.
The Kalamazoo Water Tower was saved from demolition by citizen
action and is presently being restored. Plans have been made for
restoration of the Michigan Central Depot and its incorporation
into a multi-modal transportation center. Coordination of these
various projects is through the Historical Commission.
The City Planning Commission regards an inventory and
assessment of the city's historically and architecturally significant
structures as an integral part of the continuing planning process.
A partial inventory of these structures was conducted several
years ago through the city's Historical Commission. Recently, the
Michigan Historical Division has indicated the possibility of
funding an update and expansion of the inventory. If the inventory
is redone, data will be placed in a format which will allow its
computerization, thus facilitating its use in all future planning
analysis and evaluation. It should be noted that any activity
generated by the Comprehensive Plan which would affect

�Special Areas of Concern

153

City of Kalamazoo
properties contained within the proposed inventory will be
assessed in accordance with the National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966 and the National Environment Policy Act of 1969, as
are all properties now contained within the National Register of
Historic Places.
Environmental Consideration

In order to enhance the quality of life in Kalamazoo for the present
and future, the City Commission adopted an environmental policy
on March 3, 1975. The adopted policy incorporates environmental
consideration for proposed land use changes and major
construction projects. It also attempts to ensure a minimum
adverse impact on the city's visual environment.

Residential

The City's Comprehensive Plan emphasizes significant physical
improvements in residential neighborhoods in order to upgrade
the visual appearances and promote consistent attractions in
urban design.
The city's fundamental planning goals for the residential
component include enhancing the neighborhoods' environmental
quality. A residential assessment analysis found portions of the
Northside, Edison, Central City and Eastside Neighborhoods
contained deteriorating housing. Portions of these neighborhoods
require extensive rehabilitation and redevelopment. The
Preliminary Summary of the Comprehensive Plan describes
Kalamazoo's third major housing problem as one of physical
deterioration of the current housing supply. Such deterioration
has been accelerated as a result of low-income homeowners being
financially unable to provide proper home maintenance.
The Plan recommends the city adopt and utilize techniques to
promote preservation of the currently sound residential areas and
encourage rehabilitation of homes displaying physical
deterioration. A new and intensive code enforcement program
should improve the city's residential environment by requiring
individual homeowners and landlords to maintain their properties
to specific standards. The city will enforce standards for rental
units to assure the units are up to code for subsidized renters.
These standards will apply equally to the low-income housing
market and will eliminate many structures that are not up to code.
The removal of safe or unsanitary structures promises to eliminate
unsightly houses, keep the neighborhood property value up,
protect children from dangers of unsafe structures and prevent
possible fire hazards.
The city's plan to enhance the residential environment includes
landscaping private lots and preserving the existing natural
qualities and street trees. Coupled with house painting and other
structural repairs, the city encourages residential landscaping in
an effort to preserve property values and maintain local
environmental attraction.

�Special Areas of Concern

154

Comprehensive Plan
Existing residential roads will be kept at their present capacity
and size in order to prevent increased traffic noise, gas fumes
and increase pedestrian safety.
Commercial

The Commercial C()mponent of the proposed Master Plan
encourages preservation of the city's environment through
improving existing commercial sites. With respect to future
commercial development, private individuals will be urged to
enhance the beauty and utility of their developed properties by
incorporating common parking areas, improved circulation design
and landscaping for visual appearance.
The Plan recommends the amount of land currently zoned for
commercial use be reduced in accordance with current and
projected needs. Unplanned commercial sites which are scattered
throughout a neighborhood would be allowed to remain only if
they provide a substantial service to neighborhood shoppers. The
plan recommends these unplanned but viable commercial areas
be used as a basis for future commercial development to meet the
standard definition of the neighborhood shopping area. Poor site
planning and urban design have created many problems within
existing commercial areas. The adoption of workable urban design
standards will assure proper development of future sites and
potential redevelopment of existing areas.
The Plan includes several recommendations for site designs
relative to maintaining the commercial environment in a more
natural scheme. The recommendations emphasize reducing overscaled signs and large buildings, eliminating large paved areas
and decreasing traffic noise. The visual impact of these strategies
will promote an improved environmental appeal and urban design
qualities essential to commercial growth.

Industrial

An extensive rezoning program matched with strategies for
industrial redevelopment reflect urban environmental
considerations illustrated in the city's Summary of the
Comprehensive Plan. Because Kalamazoo is over-zoned
industrially, many non-industrial uses have been and are being
developed within the industrial districts. The Plan recommends
that industrial areas being used for other than industrial purposes
be rezoned according to their predominant use. To rezone land
to match its use will prevent the existing land use conflict in terms
of environmental urban design.
For both new construction and industrial redevelopment the Plan
recommends better site design. The Plan encourages better site
design to preserve the environment, lessen industrial noise, and
allows for increased visual appeal.
The Plan recognizes that the quality and quantity of utilities and
transportation systems which service induustrial areas play a

�Special Areas of Concern

155

City of Kalamazoo

-------

prime role in attracting and retaining industry. It is recommended
that these services be upgraded within existing industrial areas
and that the city take an active role in acquiring and razing
deteriorated structures to enhance the industrial environment.
Open Space

It is the city's intent to preserve unique areas of natural interest
and increase overall landscaping to create a more positive and
uniform environmental appeal. Open space provides city residents
with fresh air, sunlight, and an opportunity for physical exercise.
The Plan recognizes open space as an essential part of the land
planning process and actively implements this theory while
designing future land uses.
The city's Department of Parks and Recreation suggests plans for
"Entryway" beautification and a system of recreational trails.
These proposed improvements may be accomplished in
conjunction with transportation improvements by providing
landscaping along major arterials. The landscaping will not only
protect and buffer residential areas, screen industrial uses, add
harmony to inconsistent commercial areas, but create aesthetic
entrances to Kalamazoo.
The recreational trail system for hikers and bike riders will be
incorporated into the city's existing parks, vacant city-owned
properties and institutional lands.
In order to help naturalize the city the Comprehensive Plan
suggests more street trees in the city by initiating an extensive
program of tree maintenance and planting.

�Special Areas of Concern

156

---------

Comprehensive Plan
Energy Consideration Statement

In order to contribute to the national goal of energy conservation
and self-sufficiency, the City of Kalamazoo has adopted as a goal
the conservation and efficient use of area energy resources.
Promoting the development of new, basic energy sources is a
complex, international task not likely to be greatly affected by
policies implemented by the City of Kalamazoo. City policies that
focus on conserving and reutilizing existing energy resources,
however, are likely to have a more productive impact on the
energy crisis. With energy conservation as a goal, the
Comprehensive Plan suggests several strategies and
implementation techniques designed to cut waste and greatly
improve energy efficiency during the next two decades.
The Comprehensive Plan supports the creation of an areawide
energy conservation program. Such a program should be created
through combined city, county, and private action to promote and
coordinate energy conservation efforts. These efforts should focus
on at least the following elements:
1 Promotion of energy efficiency in the heating, cooling, and lighting
of government and private buildings.
2 Promotion of energy efficiency in governmental, private business,
and residential operations.
3 Revision of city ordinances, where necessary, in order to remove
provisions that inhibit energy-saving innovations and to
incorporate energy-performance rather than rigid prescriptive
standards for building design and construction.
4 Expansion of both city and county home-winterization programs.
5 Utilization of property tax incentives to encourage energyconserving home improvements.
The Comprehensive Plan calls for the adoption of transportation
and land use policies and programs which should significantly
reduce energy consumption within the city. The Transportation
Component recommends the use of various strategies that should,
in concert, save energy by increasing auto-occupancy, reducing
private vehicular use, and encouraging the utilization of existing
mass transit facilities. The rail improvements encouraged by the
plan should reduce the conflict between rail and highway traffic
and the resulting energy-consuming delays. Patterns of land use
advocated in the plan should result in a more rational relationship
between land use and transportation uses. Energy efficiency will
be enhanced by the proposed location of new industrial and
commercial development and redevelopment near major
transportation routes and facilities.

�Special Areas of Concern

157

City of Kalamazoo
The city will also continue its present efforts in exploring the
feasibility of recycling waste for new supplemental energy
sources. Kalamazoo is currently pursuing involvement in a
regional solid waste management program, which may include the
burning of refuse-derived fuel (RDF) as a new energy source.
Should regional cooperation fail, the city is prepared to explore
utilization of liquid and/ or solid RDF as an energy source for the
wastewater treatment facility and/ or sale to private customers.
Nonenergy byproducts derived from this process should be
reclaimed for reuse as raw materials or other products.
Equal Opportunity Statement

Any results of the policy programming activities involved in the
proposed plan are in compliance with the Municipal Code of Fair
Practices for the City of Kalamazoo. Such activities are geared to
eliminate any discrimination in the housing situation in
Kalamazoo, as well as in the citizen participation process.
Kalamazoo has also developed an Affirmative Action Plan. The
goal of the plan is to establish and maintain an integrated and
balanced work force throughout the city. It is intended that the
various methods be employed through which the concept of equal
employment opportunity for minority groups and women can
become a reality.
Although the many elements of the Comprehensive Plan are of a
policy programming nature, the results of such activities will
reflect a non discriminatory approach.

Needs of Handicapped Residents

The City of Kalamazoo recognizes the need for continuous growth
in serving the handicapped citizen. The city encourages
implementation of essential services to provide necessary and
safe mobility. Convenient transportation and parking and barrierfree access to public and private facilities are vital elements in
serving the needs of the handicapped individuals.
The city supports the full integration of such programs to allow
the city's handicapped residents to pursue a happy and
productive life. In order to achieve success of such programs the
city will uphold the ongoing communications between
representatives of the handicapped citizens and the city.
Barrier-free housing, recreation and employment are factors
necessary to the daily life style of a handicapped person's pursuit
of independence. The fulfillment of this relies upon the city's
responsibility to provide convenient transportation. Metro Transit
has initiated service to the handicapped on a demand/response
basis through the Helen Coover Center.
Barrier-free housing regulations as required by state and federal
statutes are enforced by the city's Building Division.

�Special Areas of Concern

158

Comprehensive Plan

------------------

1n a effort to maximize the mobility of the handicapped, the city
will promote future projects to serve their needs.
Housing

In this area, the city expects compliance with the state law
requiring new and remodeled residences with more than two
living units in buildings with 3 to 25 units to supply at least one
barrier-free unit. Also, any existing building which undergoes a
change in use, such as an older home containing two apartments
that adds another must provide at least one barrier-free unit. The
city's Building Division is required by law to investigate whether
the owner is living up to the law each time it issues a building
permit.
The city encourages the construction or rehabilitation of a
sufficient supply of sound housing units which offer barrier-free
access for handicapped people. The city also supports the
initiation of rent subsidies so that handicapped residents may
obtain housing which would encourage independent living habits.

Commercial

The city expects the commercial compliance with the state law
in order to promote and increase mobility and independence.
Under the law, the handicapped people are entitled to elevators
where necessary, outside ramps, low toilets, wash basins and grab
bars, and wide entrance ways. The city recognizes the probable
added expense to commercial outlets in order to provide these
essentials, but enforces the requirements in equity to handicapped
residents.

Transportation

The City's Metro Transit Department has provided a transport
service for handicapped people on a demand/response basis
through the Helen Coover Center. A pending state law may require
Metro Transit to equip all new and, perhaps, currently owned buses
with wheelchair lifts and stanchions. New bus purchases are being
withheld by the state until resolution of this legislation later this
Spring. If enacted, these equipped buses will be run on mainline
routes.

Recreation

The city's center of recreation for handicapped residents is
primarily serviced by the Helen Coover Social-Recreation Center.
The building provides programs for those with special recreational
needs with a great emphasis on the swimming pool often used for
recreational and therapeutic purposes.
The city encourages the growth of new programs provided by the
Helen Coover Center, neighborhood schools and organizations in
order to accommodate the recreational needs of Kalamazoo
handicapped citizens. The city supports the necessary
transportation services in order to encourage full participation in
these programs.

�159

Special Areas of Concern

City of Kalamazoo
Census Tracts

December, 1976

Kalamazoo, Michigan

Figure 31

-----------------------•-----T-

l&gt; ."' " "' r-J ,1

Kalamazo Twp Part

_._,.
...~4'-, --.I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I

I

'

,...

r

'-J

I

)

2

~-J

L

ct

•

'11 ,nazoo

Twp Pa, t

:E
&lt;:

4

"

NORTH
:;

'-&lt;11,v

:ii

5

4

15 05

IOWARO

10

11

"'

16.01

12

~

lNK~TER

----~!..
I

ALCOTT

MILLER

18.01

Cr'EV
Wl➔ ITE,1

I

(I

I

0
0
N
&lt;!

15.03

"'
"2Cl
l-

I

I

, . . - ... ,

"'

a:

3

r_.

:

&gt;

PROUTY

1401

,L-.,

. . . ffi

15 02

I

,3

15.01

COt":!&lt;

""

_____ _
16.02

"z

ex:

17.01

w

l-

"'!;!

.

~

0

17.02

(.)

-,.,, J--~'
...-,

I

....

LJ1:i.,

I

�Special Areas of Concern

161

City of Kalamazoo
Kalamazoo County Population Projections
Table 16
U.S. Census

----

-

1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000

MDSH&amp;T

MOB

Upjohn*

Average

227,692
242,500
256,585
269,761
289,285
307,102

209,678
222,130
235,390
248,493
261,862**
275,950**

208,676
217,101
227,111
235,773
242,873
248,873

215,349
227,244
239,695
251,342
264,673
277,308

201,550

*Projections from Series II population projections by Rodger S. Lawson of the
W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research in "Population of Kalamazoo
County, Michigan," August 1975
• *Projections for 1975 and 2000 derived from average rate of projected
population figures between each five year period from 1970- 1990
Table Prepared by Kalamazoo County Planning Department, 1976

1976 Vacant Acreage to Be Developed Residentially
Table 17
Census
Tracts

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Low
Density

Medium
Density

High
Density

Total

29.82
.73
73.30

16.45

6.46

46.27
.73
79.76

2.93
39.95

29.23
5.43

2.20

32.16
47.58

24.82

16.15

1.76

42.73

12.04

5.87

16.89

34.80

100.33
95.77

5.87

6.61

112.81
95.77

519.43
130.15
326.26
84.76
48.91
34.81
19.83
1,543.84
(88.0%)

29.82
18.66

2.35

7.34
17.92

1.46

551.60
148.81
326.26
93.56
66.83
34.81
39.95
1,754.43
(100.0%)

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
14.01
15.04
15.05
16.01
16.02
17.01
17.02
18.01
18.02

20.12
179.32
(10.2%)

31.27
(1.8%)

Source: Table developed by the Community Development Department
Planning Division, 1976

�Special Areas of Concern

162

Comprehensive Plan
Net Change in Dwelling Units: Based on Density Measures

Table 18

Tract

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Low

Medium

17
-149
152
-25
-95
-18

373
-568
417
-220
334
335

99
-98
40
-31
401
383

128
-626
59
-348
25

2,078
521
1,305
339
196
139
79
5,333

298
187

High

Total Change
Dwelling Units

Very High

71
-525
158
273
236

Percent
Change

461
-1,242
569
-87
28
603

38.4
-123.3
29.8
-16.0
51.0
19.4

187
-995
309
-239
525
383

13.9
-129.4
11.5
-11.3
41.5
36.9

2,435
708
1,305
603
425
36
280
6,580

117.1
92.2
142.5
44.1
37.9
2.5
17.1
24.2

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
14.01
15.04
15.05
16.01
16.02
17.01
17.02
18.01
18.02

-40
-271
210
140
99

59

242
229
-36
201
1,080

22
-67
-338

505

Source: Table developed by the Community Development Department
Planning Division, 1976

Population and Employment Growth Rates in Kalamazoo County
Table 19

Years

1950-1960
1960-1970
1970-1975
Table prepared by the Planning
Division, 1976

Ratio

Population

Employment

Growth Rate

Increases
Percent

Increases
Percent

Difference
Percent

Employment
To
Population

33.9
18.8
6.8

27.5
26.1
8.4

6.4
7.3
1.6

.81
1.38
1.24

Sources: Upjohn Institute, July 1972, Michigan Employment Security
Commission, July 1976; Southcentral Michigan Planning Council,
August, 1976

�Propose d residential townhouses, south Street

�Technical Studies Bibliography

164

Comprehensive Plan
Planning Division
Technical Studies

This bibliography is a listing of the technical source materials used
by the Planning Commission and its staff to write this Summary
of the Comprehensive Plan. These technical reports are available
to the public for reading at the Planning Division, City Hall.

Land Use Component

Residential Element (October, 1976)
Housing Element (August, 1976)
Commercial Element (January, 1977)
Commercial Areas Study
CBD Technical Studies

Economic Value
Land Use
Residential Development
Parking
Traffic Circulation
Cost-Revenue Analysis
(Barton-Aschman: June, 1977)
Industrial Element (December, 1976)
Open Space Component

See: City of Kalamazoo Parks and Facility Master
Plan Outline (Department of Parks and Recreation
October, 1975, June, 1976)

Transportation Component

See the following reports:
Streets and Highways: Problems, Issues and Alternatives
(October, 1976)

Functional Classification of Street Networks: Trip Generation
by Neighborhood (July, 1976)
Report on the Kalamazoo Transportation Study Deficiency
Analysis (July, 1976)
Report on the US 131 - BR to 194- BL Connector Feasibility Study
(August, 1976)
Report on Short Range Plan of Metro Transit (August, 1976)
Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment Report:
Kalamazoo Municipal Airport (Williams &amp; Works, Inc., 1976)
Southwest Michigan Regional Airport Study (Airways Engineering
Corp):
Report No. 1: Inventory and Forecast (November, 1975)
Report No. 2: Demand/Capacity Analyses and Facility
Requirements (February, 1976)
Report No. 3: Site Recommendations (May, 1976)

Overview of Kalamazoo Region Rail Systems (May, 1976)
A Report of the Problems, Issues and Alterations of the Railroads
(October, 1976)

�Technical Studies Bibliography

165

City of Kalamazoo
Community Facilities
Component

See: Kalamazoo Community Renewal Programming System,
Community Facilities Analysis (Gerald Luedtke &amp; Associates,
1975)

Utilities Component

See: City of Kalamazoo Water Utility Management Plan
Kalamazoo City Utilities, February, 1975)
City of Kalamazoo Master Plan of Storm Drainage
(Jones and Henry, Inc., April, 1976)
201 Facilities Plan, Kalamazoo Metropolitan Area,
Vol. 1: City of Kalamazoo, Segmented Plan
(Jones and Henry, September, 1976)

Demography

Demographic Analysis (January, 1975)

Neighborhoods

Neighborhood Position Papers (February, 1976)

Goals and Planning
Documents of City

Kalamazoo City Planning Commission Goals and
Policies Planning Documents

Guidelines for Community Development: Pre-Public Hearing
(November, 1974)
- - ---Guidelines for Community Development: Post-Public Hearing
(November, 1974)
Goals and Objectives for the Comprehensive Planning Policy
(November, 1974)
Fiscal Impact

Fiscal Impact Evaluation Proposals The Comprehensive
Plan Development (Activity No. 4; Barton-Aschman Associates:
March, 1977)

Flood Plan

Flood Plain Report (Planning Division: August, 1976)

Other Source Materials

Profiles of Change (R. L. Polk and Co., 1975)

Bureau of the Census

U.S. Department of Commerce:
Block Statistics: Kalamazoo, Michigan Urbanized Area (1970)
Census Tracts: Kalamazoo, Michigan SMSA (1970)
Metropolitan Area Statistics (1970)

Business Conditions

Business Conditions in Kalamazoo, Upjohn Institute for
Employment Research (See especially the issues of July, 1972,
April, 1974, October, 1974).
See also: Population of Kalamazoo County, Michigan:
Estimates as of July 1, 1973 and Projections to 2000 (Up john
Institute, August, 1975)

Annual Planning

Annual Planning Report for Kalamazoo-Portage SMSA: Fiscal Year
1977 (Michigan Employment Security Commission, Received in
November, 1976)

�166

Technical Studies Bibliography

Comprehensive Plan
:,,___.,,

Housing

City of Kalamazoo Housing Assistance Plan (February, 1975)
Housing Analysis: Part I (Southcentral Michigan Planning Council
1975)

Code Enforcement Study (Mullin and Honey, Consultants:
August, 1976)
Capital Improvement

Office of the City Manager: Five Year Capital Improvement
Program: 1973-1977 (Tentative Draft) (Revised, April, 1973)

Transportation

Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study Reports:
Street Inventory and Capacity Analysis: Technical Report No. 3
(Vorhees and Associates: April, 1969)

Prospectus and Unified Transportation Work Program; Kalamazoo
Urban Area, Fiscal Year 1977 (November, 1975)
Kalamazoo Federal-Aid System: Existing Street Network, and
Future Alternative Networks
City of Kalamazoo US 131 - BR to I 94- BL Connector Feasibility
Study: Draft Report (Gilbert/Commonwealth, Inc., July, 1976)
City of Kalamazoo, East-Central Rail/Highway Study
(Commonwealth Associates, April, 1975)

City of Kalamazoo Thoroughfare System Plan (Ad Hoc Committee,
March, 1971)

Preliminary Major Thoroughfare Plan: City of Kalamazoo and
Environs (Kalamazoo City Planning Commission, December, 1950)
Feasibility Study of a Regional Airport for the Southwestern
Michigan Area (prepared for the Kalamazoo-Battle Creek Joint
Regional Airport Study Committee by Ralph H. Burke Associates,
1969)
Fiscal Impact

Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Comprehensive Plan, Studies
prepared for Kalamazoo by Barton-Aschman Associates

Comprehensive Plan Alternatives: Outline of Proposed Work
Program (October, 1975)
Activity No. 1: Cost/Revenue Data Need (June, 1976)
Neighborhood Reconnaissance: Central City Area (July, 1976)
Activity No. 3: Cost/Revenue Methodology (July, 1976)
Neighborhood Development Program (September, 1976)
Community Renewal

Kalamazoo Community Renewal Programming System Studies,
prepared for Kalamazoo by Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Inc.:

Technical Working Paper 100.5: Planning and Programming
Analysis (July, 1973)
Technical Working Paper 100.1: Analysis of Historical Growth
Patterns and Trends (October, 1973)

�Special Areas of Concern

167

City of Kalamazoo
Technical Working Paper 100.6: Citizen Participation Analysis
(October, 1973)

Design Resources Inventory (November, 1973)

-

--- ---

-------------

Technical Working Paper 200.1: CRPS Parcel Survey Manual
(November, 1973)

- - ----------------

Technical Working Paper 300: Information System Requirements
For Community Renewal Programming and Comprehensive
Policies Planning (June, 1974)

----

Technical Working Paper 300: Information System Requirements
for Community Renewal Programming and Policies Planning
(July, 1974)

Technical Working Paper 200.3: Data Utilization Strategy
(Part IV) (October, 1974)
----------

Work Program for Preparation of the Kalamazoo Comprehensive
Policies Plan (March, 1975)
Statistical Evaluation of Kalamazoo Parcel Survey and
Recommended Future Validation Procedures of Staff Use
(July, 1975)
---- --- ------------------Community Facilities Analysis (August, 1975)
------See also: Attendance Pattern Study (Kalamazoo Public Schools,
February, 1976)
--------Hospital Facilities Planning Survey (Planning Division, interviews
with and materials supplied by hospital officials, May, 1975)

Technical Working Paper 500.2: Rehabilitation Costs Analysis
(October, 1975)

Technical Working Paper 500.2: Residential and Non-Residential
Rehabilitation Analysis (November, 1975)
Feasibility

Feasibility Study Report: Kalamazoo Central City Area
(Kalamazoo City Planning Commission, February, 1963)

Neighborhood Analysis

Neighborhood Analysis: Kalamazoo Urban Area
(Kalamazoo City Planning Commission, August, 1963)

Planning Documents

Planning Documents from Kalamazoo County and Other
Communities in the County

Comprehensive Plans

Comprehensive Planning Reports prepared for the Kalamazoo
County Metropolitan Planning Commission by Schellie Associates:

A Comprehensive Plan for Kalamazoo County - 1970 to 1990
(Summary) (proposed June, 1970)
Comprehensive Planning Program: Plan Elements, 1970-1990;
Land Use (May, 1970)

------------------

Comp re hens ive Planning Program: Plan Elements, 1970-1990;
Transportation (May, 1970)

�Technical Studies Bibliography

168

Comprehensive Plan
Comprehensive Planning Program: Plan Elements, 1970-1990;
Community Facilities (May, 1970)
Comprehensive Planning Program: Plan Elements, 1970-1990;
Implementation (May, 1970)
Open Space

Open Space, Kalamazoo County Michigan (Rober.t L. O'Boyle
Associates, September, 1971)

City Plans

City of Portage, Master Plan (1970)
City of Parchment, Zoning Map (1974)
City of Galesburg (land use planning in progress)

Township Plans

Alamo Township, Land Use Plan Map (1971)
Comstock Township, Use District Map (1977)
Cooper Township, Land Use Plan Map (1977)
Kalamazoo Township, Interim Land Use Plan (1976)
Oshtemo Township, Master Land Use Plan (proposed, 1976)
Pavilion Township, Existing Zoning Map (1967)
Richland Township, Use District Map (1975)
----Texas Township (land use planning in progress)

��Land Use Plan

Prepared by the City Planning Commission Kalamazoo, Michigan 1977

City of Kalamazoo
Low Density Residential

----

-

Expressways

Medium Density Residential

Arterials

High Density Residential

•

Commercial

- - - City Limits

Heavy Industry
Public, Semi Public
Parks, Open Space
Light Industry

■

--

•

Potential Improvements
Land Use Plan Boundry
Wholesale/Warehouse
Office

WHITES
PARKVIEW

�;..

'}

,n

"'2.-I
m
0
Cl

m

This plan was adopted by the City Planning Commission
on the

lM

day of

v~ ,

~~~;£

G. Michael Conlisk, Secretary

map revised

1977

;,;:

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008758">
                <text>Kalamazoo_Comprehensive-Plan-Summary_1977</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008759">
                <text>Kalamazoo Planning Commission, City of Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008760">
                <text>1977-10-11</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008761">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan Summary</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008762">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan Summary for the City of Kalamazoo was prepared by the Kalamazoo Planning Commission and the Department of Community Development. The Plan Summary was approved by the City Commission on October 11, 1977. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008763">
                <text>Department of Community Development (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008764">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008765">
                <text>Kalamazoo (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008766">
                <text>Kalamazoo County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008767">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008769">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008770">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008771">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008772">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038355">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54689" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58960">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6866c4102ef27cd587d98ddabcb889bf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>287ce2aa2c2907172b924a09a9c85d31</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008140">
                    <text>COMPREHENSIVE
RECREATION
PLAN

�"· FROM THE LIBRARY OF
'Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.

I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I

COMPREHENSIVE RECREATION PLAN
Emmet County

PREPARED FOR:
EMMET COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH, 1970

PREPARED BY:
VILICAN-LEMAN &amp; ASSOCIATES, INC.
COMMUNITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS
29621 NORTHWESTERN HIGHWAY
SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 48075
CONTRACT ITEMS:
B-1, Part, B-4 and B-5

�CONTENTS

I

-F OREWORD

I

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY INFORMATION

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

INTRODUCTION

1

STATEMENT OF COUNTY RECREATION GOALS

2

COUNTY RECREATION ANALYSIS

5

DEVELOPMENT OF RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

6

THE NEED FOR PLANNING STANDARDS

8

SUMMARY OF RECREATION CONCEPTS

9

COUNTY RECREATION ANALYSIS - REGIONAL DIMENSION
RECREATION TYPES

12

PRIVATE AND SEMI - PRIVATE RECREATION

14

BROAD SCALE RESOURCE INTERPRETATIONS

18

BROAD SCALE RESOURCES OF EMMET COUNTY

21

COUNTY RECREATION ANALYSIS - LOCAL DIMENSION
LOCAL RECREATION DIMENSION

25

CONCEPTS AND STANDARDS

25

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS

27

INVENTORY AND DEMAND

28

LOCAL RECREATION PLAN

32

COUNTY - WIDE RECREATION PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS

48

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I

-

ILLUSTRATIONS
SELECTED RESOURCE INVENTORY

19A

CONCEPT SKETCHES :
MICRO CLIMATES

21A

SOIL SURVEY

22A

SCENIC AND RECREATION RESOURCES

23A

NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL-PARK CONCEPT

26A

RECREATION PLAN

47A

T 'A B LES
SELECTED PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES

15

2.

PUBLIC RECREATION LAND INVENTORY

29

3:

LOCAL RECREATION NEEDS

33

1.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I

I
I
I

FOREWORD
This is the fourth (4th) in a series of Preliminary Plan reports for Emmet
County, Michigan, and contains the analysis of recreation at both the regional
and local leveL

Preliminary Comprehensive Plan reports are published to enable ci t izens, organi zations, and others interested in the future of the County, to review initial find ings before a final plan is adopted.

Any comments or suggestions on this material

w ill be welcome subjects for discussion and consideration by the Emmet County
Planning Commission .

The preparation of this report required the cooperation of numerous officials and
agencies concerned with resources and recreation in Emmet County.

Hence,

credit for much of the resource data contained in this report and related County
planni'ng· reports must be accorded to the following :

Mr . William Grimm, District Conservationist, U.S. Soil Conservati on
Service, Boyne City
Mr . Robert 0. Dodge and Mr . Lawrence Miller, Parks Di.vision, Michigan
Department of Natural Resources, Lansing.
Mr . Edmund J . Ecker, Area Forester, Michigan Department of Natural
Resources, Indian River.
Mr . Stephen Swan, District Fisheries Biologist, Michigan Department of
Natural Resources, Gaylord.

' ' The preparation of this report was financially aided through a Federal Grant from
the Department of Housing and Urban Development, under the Urban Planning
Assistanc,e Pr·ogr·am, a _u thori'zed by Section· 701 ·o( the Housing ,Act of 1954, ?-S
amended, admi:nistered by ,the Michigan Dep'.a rtment .of Commerce. 11

�INTRODUCTION

&amp;

SUMMARY INFORMATION

�I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

INTRODUCTION
In man's attempt to flee the high density urban environment he has created, he
rushes on weekends and vacations to the countryside.

"Man depends on nature,

and since he cannot live without the natural environment or iri an environment
modified beyond certain limits, the preservation of nature and its resources
1
becomes the first and basic goal. 11

Past and current trends with regard to recreation indicate a mounting impact
upon those areas endowed with scenic natural resources.

Increases in metro-

politan population, coupled with more buying power and greater mobility, will
place new demands upon recreation facilities available to the public,.

The north-

ern region of Michigan's Lower Peninsula offers vast recreation potentials for
the future leisure-oriented public, and as highway and air traffic facilities continue to improve, tourist visitation will become larger and more frequent.

In addition to tourists, the State's northern resources offer an outstanding outdoor environment to its residents, who should assume the responsibility for
retaining the quality of the environment.

Outside pressures will be exerted in

increasing quantities throughout the region, and on;y through advance planning
and concerted action can the area avoid the depletion of environmental resources
experienced in and around metropolitan areas.

This is an exacting process that

will demand innovative approaches to recreation home subdividing, road building,
community development, and wilderness sanctuaries.

The region must be satis-

fied with being a mere reflection of development techniques used elsewhere, but
must imaginatively combine the vast recreation re&lt;Sources found among public
and private lands with the most up-to-date development concepts.

Doxiadis, Costantinos A. Emergence and Growth of an Urban Region - the
Developing Urban Detroit Area
Volume 2, Detroit Edison Company, 1967,
Page 29.

-1-

�I
I
I
I
I
I

STATEMENT

OF

COUNTY

RECREATION

GOALS

The goals and objectives of the Recreation Plan for Emmet County are presented
at two levels :

short-range and long-range.

While these goals are presented

separately, they are closely inter-related and depending upon circumstances at
the moment, a long-range goal may be implemented before a short-range goal.

SHORT - RANGE RECREATION GOALS
Improve facilities at existing community parks and expand parks to serve
citizens in the County.

I
Existing public lands owned by 'townships_,, villages

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

i

the County and school

districts should be given priority consideration for recreation-community
facility development.

If applicable, design local parks to serve visitors and tourists as well as
community residents.
the multiple function

While local recreation demands should have priority,
concept is an important consideration.

Provide specific recreational facilities and parks to serve the needs of
children, youth, young families, adults, and retirement age citizens, as
demand indicates.

Develop necessary administrative procedures, citizen committees and/ or
official park commissions to oversee the evolvement of a complete parkrecreation system.

Desirably, a recreation system should include County

parks or coordinated local recreation systems at the County level.

Utilize available funding programs from state and federal agencies to
implement recreation plans in the County and municipalities within the
County .

I
-2-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

'

Encourage the preparation of detailed site plans and working drawings to
guide actual improvements to recreation areas.

Promote park usage with adequate signs or other measures to identify available facilities, especially when tourist interest is a factor.

LONG-RANGE AND CONTINUING RECREATION GOALS
Ad.opt zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations and other development
controls which recognize recreation and natural resources as a vital element
of community responsibility.

Promote an equitable distribution of parks, recreation areas and facilities
in the County.

Inform private recreation investors of County resources £or outdoor recreation and of proper development standards to meet present day requirements.

Guide community improvements so that gradual progress 1s made to enhance
the potential for development of private outdoor recreational facilities.
Basic improvements include :

electric power, natural gas, road improve-

ments, airports, and related .

Preserve historic areas for their cultural value in the County as well as
for their tourist appeal.

Protect wildlife habitat areas from pollution, drainage, and other depletion
acts which may alter the ecological balance between wildlife, resources
and man.

-3-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Acquire or otherwise insure the preservation of outstanding natural features
which may or may not have been inventoried in this Plan, but which fall with;,. _
in the principles of sound recreation planning for Emmet County and the
communities therein.

Coordinate over-all recreation planning and development with individual
communities, state and federal agencies, sportsmen clubs or associations,
private recreation entrepreneurs, and others, with County and regional
recreation objectives.

This suggests that each development be viewed as

part of a larger, more complete, and convenient recreation system.

Evolve a comprehensive system of park-recreational facilities in the
County and communities of the County.

be limited to; community parks, neighborhood parks, recreation buildings,
recreation structures, swimming beaches and other specific facilities
necessary to support active or passive recreational pursuits.

I

I
I

Facilities include, but would not

-4-

�&amp;£

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

COUNTY

RECREATION ANALYSIS

The purpose of the County Recreation Plan is to serve as a guide in the maintenance, creation and perpetuation of resources, both natural and man-made, as
they relate to the recreation environment.

Emphasis is placed not only upon

resident use and enjoyment, but on the attraction potential for tourists as well.

The County Recreation Plan is a flexible guide, from which orderly growth and
dev elopment may ensue.

It is not meant to be a rigid plan of action that can be

outdated by short-range cycles in recreation desires or changing population
characteristics .

Hence, the implementation of the concepts in this study hinge

upon broad endorsement by County residents who must participate on decisions
to pre-serve the County's outstanding natural environment.

Each recreation project involves considerable detailed planning for site characteristics, use demand, cost benefit analysis and methods for financing.

A single

County Comprehensive Plan cannot and should not answer these details for each
recreational area or potential.

OBJECTIVES
The future of Emmet County as a regional focal point in the area of outdoor recreation will depend on successes in achieving the following goals:

To illustrate where recreational facilities exist.

To familiarize County residents and potential developers with existing resources and environmental advantages.

To guide in the identification and reservation of desirable and needed recre ation sites, recognizing that many unique areas can be diverted to other uses.

I
- 5-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

To propose design standards for preserving and developing the County's
natural resources.

To guide future development based upon a projected design concept aimed
at unifying the recreational elements of the County.

To insure an equitable distribution of parks, recreation areas and facilities.

To encourage comprehensive outdoor recreation planning at private, commercial and public levels with regard to site development and its compatibility
to the County as a whole.

To point up the need for various means of control in natural resource development.

This analysis of Emmet County's Recreation Plan begins with an inventory of all
major recreational features in the County including soils, topography, scenic
areas and man-made facilities.

These are viewed in terms of the County's region-

al setting and the various types of recreational activity that is in demand.

The

proposed plan is a synthesis of the inventory, adaptable recreation features, and
the overall concept of recreation applicable to the County.

DEVELOPMENT OF RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
The provision of all recreational facilities discussed in this report lie beyond the
County's present and foreseeable financial capabilities.

However, the County, as

a unit of government, should not be singularly responsible for providing all such
facilities .

It is nontheless recognized that recreational resource potentials must

be preserved until adequate parks, trails, beaches, and water bodies are needed
and developed .

The realistic achievement of this goal will necessitate cooperative

action between various groups - only one of which will be the County.

- 6-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

,.,

To implement the County Recreation Plan, some new measures will probably be
required to enable or promote cooperative development programs among governmental agencies, quasi-public bodies and private groups.

It is intended that pri-

vate enterprise, in the form of commercial or tourism recreation, be an active
element in the realization of this plan.

To be economically feasible for development, a private resort or recreation area
must have:

The potential to serve a desired use;

A market, or demand;

Design production (number of lots, houses, rooms, facilities, etc.)
to meet a need or deficiency and to pay for the cost of development and
provide a profit to developers.

To be aesthetically successful, the resort or recreation facility must;

Retain the original characteristics of the natural environment that makes
the area desirable;

Be of a quality that co _m plements the natural environment; hence, careful
attention to architectural design, choice of materials, and methods of
construction;

Be an activity which complements or adapts to the natural environment and
adjacent uses.

-7-

�I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

To be successful in a planning sense, the resort or recreation facili t y must:

Be viewed in its total context with the County, northern Michigan and
M 'i dwest region.

Have the various physical elements designed in a coordinated and efficient
manner so as to give diversity and complementary economic support.

See these elements 1n relation to the over-all benefit of the area and the
total environment.

To attain "successful developments 11 in this sense means that we:

Do not overdevelop to the extent that the carrying capacity of the land is
exceeded;

Do not break down the existing systems of plant and animal ecology;

Must develop and meet environmental standards of design and implementation ;

Must avoid those developments that, over a period of years, downgrade
adjacent or potential uses.

THE NEED FOR PLANNING STANDARDS
To encourage sound recreation developments, the County must establish minimum
design criteria and minimum development controls .

This is more critical than

prescribing minimum park acreages per 1, 000 population and will be essential
to protect those natural amenities originally making the County desirable.

Fail -

ure to do this will result in less quality and less ability to maintain a quality
environment for future generations.

-8-

�I
I
I
I

The last twenty years have witnessed vast changes in leisure oriented activities.
There is a definite distinction between resort life in the 1950 1 s and resort life
in 1970.

The camping boom is still on the increase as are first class motor inn

complexes.

Tourist accommodations which supply quality services and quality

environment manage a successful livelihood.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Resort areas of the nation are experiencing a housing boom with regard to seasonal
or vacation homes.

Too many of these developments are carried through w it hout

planning and lack proper concepts for future development.

As a result, we see

our scarce water frontages subdivided into small lots which when built up lose
the natural character and the amenities that originally made the area saleable.
Over-crowding, pollution, poor architecture, poor site planning, inadequate roads,
extinction of the native vegetation - these are some of the factors contributing to
the depletion of what was once thought as a natural resource.

It has happened

in metropolitan areas and it will happen in Emmet County, until development
embodies standards which spell the difference between quality and
building.

11

11

just another

Too often, planning regulations are forgotten at city or village limits ;

too often, people living within scenic rural areas are oblivious to what makes the
area enjoyable until these factors are altered or disappear.

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS IN OVERALL CONCEPTS
1.

Missionaries - Promote the historically important role of the missionar y
in Emmet County.

Acquire historic sites, build replicas of former

missions, churches, shrines, trading posts, Indian cultural centers, and
related points of interest.

This historical theme is an important c u ltural

heritage which though not unique to the County, is suited to the attractions
of recreation.

I
-9 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2.

interesting facets of any areas history, including Emmet County.

I
I
I

The

shores of Lake Michigan and communities of Petoskey, Harbor Springs,
Middle Village, Cross Village and Mackinaw City all have a strong history
in Indian culture.

Historical markers, reconstructed Indian v illages,

museums, and related means can be used to express Indian history to the
educational- cultural advancement of tourists and citizens.

3.

Agriculture - Since the County has some excellent agricultural lands, work
toward the continuance of farming enterprises.

Marginal farms may beco·m e

economically sound by adding supplemental activities, such as camping,
hunting, fishing and vacation farm activity.

Farms are necessary for bas i c

food production, they are important economic forces, they support a higher
level of wildlife for sportsmen, and are important in maintaining open space.

4.

Scenic Easement - Scenic easements are means of preserving scenic areas
without taking title in fee.

I
I
I
I
I
I

Indian Culture - The life, habits and history of the Indian people are highl y

Easements would be most logical along rivers

where natural image is important to canoeists and/or fishermen.

Also,

along some roadways where panoramic views may become obscurred by
development.

5.

Scenic Drives - Establish a system of scenic drives to link spe cific recre ation activities and sites with one another .

The concept of outdoor recre -

ation necessarily involves the scenic quality of access routes.

Since Emmet

County benefits from the fall color season, the scenic routes may be multi functional.

At the present time, the main access to the Wilderness Stat e

Park does not present the image of a wilderness recreation area .

-10 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I

6.

establishment of one or more County parks.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

If so, these should be coordin -

ated into the recreation system so as to supplement and operate in harmony
with community parks and state parks.

Some recreational opportunities may

only be established through County level action.

7.

Local Parks - Recreation for County residents will evolve from County
features and tourist facilities.

However, each community within the County

will have specific local recreational demands to fulfill.

I

I

County Parks - A Gounty level interest in recreation may well lead to the

County, school

district, township and village lands should be given priority consideration as
resources for local recreational facilities.

8.

Important to the Recreation Plan is the resource inventory.

A more de -

tailed inventory of soils, plant and animal ecology, and active recreation
sites would strengthen the basis for detailed planning in the years ahead,
and this should be pursued.

9.

Because of the limited funds available for recreational facilities, the County
should encourage the development of recreational facilities through private
enterprise and other public agencies.

(Bureau of Outdoor Recreation,

Michigan State Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Forest Service, et c .)

10.

Standards of design should be developed and incorporated into local de v elop ment controls (zoning, easements, sul:3division regulations, as well as
boards of review) and where possible, applied on a County-wide basis.

-11-

�I

COUNTY RECREATION ANALYSIS
Regional Dimension

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

RECREATION

TYPES

Recreation is recognized as the humi3,n necessity to pursue those activities that
refresh the mind and body, be they achieved through contemplation of scenery,
v isitation of historical sites , close association with geological and biological
forces of nature, or through such activities as boating, skiing, campi.ng, hunting
and other outdoor sports or community activities.

For the purpose of this report,

recreation will be considered in terms of outdoor activities, active or passive,
which are influenced by the landscape environment of which they are a part.

Man

utilizes the landscape to test his senses and he seeks those landscapes which will
provide him with a variety of experiences.

Federal and state involvement in _ recreation is highly interdisciplinary . . It aims
toward the principle of multiple use of natural and man-made resources. Therefore,
state and federal lands, forests, and waters may be utilized for their potential
as spots of scenic beauty, wildlife refuge, or source of commercial timber. F£deral
and state programs are aimed at satisfying regional and continental demands and
usually involve recreation experiences related to conservation areas, historical
sites , natural preserves and wilderness regions.

County and local governmental bodies are, engaged in similar recreation types,
but usually on a smaller scale ,

Moreover, usage is aimed largely at area resi-

dents, except in tourist economy areas, such as Emmet County.

The objective

to satisfy tourist demands may well dominate local recreation planning and development because local needs can be satisfied in part with tourist attractions.

The private sector of outdoor recreation is highly diverse, but may be broken down
1
into the following major components :

1

Thompson , John R . , Parks and Recreation, ''The Giant Nobody Knows", March,

1968.
-12-

�Profit seeking outdoor recreation enterprises:

Ski resorts
Golf courses
Campgrounds

I

Fish and hunt camps

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Vacation farms, resorts and lodges

I
I
I

Riding stables

Swimming pools
Canoe liveries

Non-profit outdoor recreation enterprises:

Voluntary Associations - church groups, YMCA, YWCA, boy scouts, girl
scouts , boys clubs, 4-H clubs
Employee membership only
Impoundments licensed by Federal Power Commission
Private forest lands

Participant - financed outdoor recreation enterprises:

Golf and country clubs
Hunting preserves
Boat clubs
Riding clubs
Swimming and diving clubs
Athletic clubs
Snowmobiling clubs

-13-

�Some of the more interesting dominant characteristics of the private recreation-

r

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

al enterprise on a national scale are :

Average development is small - about 52 acres.
Most endeavors have a low capital investment.
Income is usually supplementary to a regular income .
The majority have no paid employees.
Very little promotion is done .

Many of these characteristics are applicable to Emmet County, and are already
developed to a high degree.

For example, the ski resorts of Boyne Highlands

and Nubs Nob rank among the finest facilities in the Midwest.

PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE RECREATION RESOURCES
TABLE 1 lists the private and semi - private recreational facilities available in
Emmet County.

Also given on the table are reference locations and approximate

acreages of each facility .

For the most part, the list inventories non-public

recreation resources, and although it may not be a 100% accurate list, it represents the spectrum of private recreation in Emmet County. 1

As a general obser-

vation, private recreational services are regional in their scope of services, and
rely strongly on tourist visitation for economic support.

Like regional public

recreation areas, they serve local needs as well.

The most dominant private recreational resources are Boyne Highlands and
Nubs Nob.

These ski resorts are complete recreation complexes that offer

scenic resources, vacation home subdivisions, con~ominium recreation dwellings,
tourist lodging, restaurant services, _golf and other activities for complete year
around recreation activity .

Snowmobiling_:_- will also become a more dominant

recreational pursuit in this area .

Both ski complexes contain more than 70

percent of the private recreation land inventoried in the County ( 1, 980 acres).
1

Data was derived from the County land use inventory, aerial photographs, County
Plat Book, and Comprehensive Plan Reports prepared for the County, Petoskey,
and Harbor Springs .
-14-

�-------

-----------TABLE

1

SELECTED PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
Emmet County

,_.
u,
I

Facility ,

Location by Township
or Reference

Northland Drive-in Theatre
Hollywood Theatre
Victory Lanes Bowling
Petoskey Bay- View Count:ry Club
Emmet Sportsmens Club (US-131)
US-131 Golf Driving Range
Petoskey Bowmens Club
Camp Petosega
May Marina
Crooked Lake Yacht Club
Two (2) Trout Ponds
Ponshewaing Marina
Alanson Marinas
Petoskey Playhouse
W eq uetonsing Golf Club
Harbor Point Golf Course
Birchmont Farm Resort
Walstroms Marina
Club Ponytail
5-Mile Creek Community Center
Boyne Highlands Ski Resort
Nubs Nob Ski Resort
Trout Ponds
Boat-Rental
Indian Museum
Marina
Wilderness Golf Club
J ordans Campground
Riding Stable
Trout Ponds
Campgrounds

Resort
Petoskey
Petoskey
Bear Creek
Bear Creek
Bear Creek
Springvale
Pickerel Lake
Oden
Crooked Lake
Littlefield
Littlefield
Alanson
Oden
Little Traverse
West Traverse
West Traverse
Harbor Springs
Little ,T raverse
Friendship
Pleasantview
Pleasantview
Maple River
Larks Lake
Cross Village
Paradise Lake
Carp Lake
Paradise Lake
Wawatam
Wawatam
Mackinaw City

TOTALS

Approximate Use
Acreage
10. 0 acres

.1
•5

110. 0
30.0

5. 0
5. 0
190.0

2. 5
. 1

5

7. 0
. 5
1. 0

.6
153. 0
96.2
30. 0
4. 0

.5
5. 0
1,780.0
200. 0
20.0

.1
.3
.3
90 . 0

6.

0

5. 0
•&amp;
2. 1
2, 7 55. 7 acres

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Some other recreational services from the private sector include :

recreation

farms , golf clubs, marinas, riding stables, trout ponds, camp grounds, and
sportsmen clubs.

Intensive indoor recreati on is provided by club buildings,

bowling alleys, theatres, and playhouse,s.

Although ski i ng has exerted an e x ceptional influence on Emmet County 1 s tourist
economy and has extended the vacation season to year around prominence, summer
recrea ti on related to sand, sun and water is still the predominant tourist volume
attracti on .

Winter tourism can be expected to grow in importance since the

popularity of the snowmobile .

By the spring of 1970 , it has been estimated that there will be about 100, 000
snowmobiles in Michigan .

Add to this the machines that may come from Illinois,

Ohio , Indiana, and other states , and Michigan 1 s w"inter attraction potential looks
considerably brighter .

Emmet C o unty is excellently positioned to become a major Midwest snowmobile
center , and freeways
e x isting levels .

e x tending northward will improve accessibility beyond

The County may well be concerned about the snowmobile in

terms of:

Scenic trails
Winter- camping
Machine sales
Repair services and parts

0££- sea son storage
Servic e centers , with parking , gasoline, food, entertainment, etc.

-16-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

It may not be beyond reason to expect snowmobiling to assume resort proportions , much like ski resorts.

By 1976, winter tourism may be as big as the

summer season . 1

Such a resort could be a year around use of the vacation £arm or dude ranch
s i nce steep topography is not a requirement.

Snowmobiling to be most success-

ful , will require close public - private cooperation, because snowmobiles cover
long distances , hence , public and private lands must be packaged to provide
continuous safe trails .

At the same time resources and privacy must be insured.

The snowmobile has trend overtones, of a major outdoor sport.
are conflicts between snowmobiles and other County sports.

However, there

Therefore, County-

w i de efforts will become necessary to designate snowmobile trails, perhaps
following the early overland trails of Indians , exploit'ers and missionaries.

Some

areas and trails should be restricted so that snowshoeing, cross country skiing
and wildlife habitates are not subjected to the disturbance of motorized vehicles.
Old logging roads , pipeline right - of- ways , abondoned railroad grades, and
seasonal County roads represent resources £or snowmobile trails.

The vacation home is an important economic £actor in tourism-recreation .

Be-

cause Emmet County has vast areas of land oriented to water resources, the
vacation home is and will continue to represent an increasingly important element of local recreation - both £or working and retirement families .

A Bureau

of Outdoor Recreation Study for the Northern New England States revealed that
v acation homes averaged $10 , 659 in that area , ranging from a value of $2, 100
to over $18 , 000 .

1

In addition, the vacation home family spends about $1, 900

Mr . Kenneth Dorman , Manager , Upper Michi gan Touri st Association, Iron
Mo unta in , Michi gan . SOURCE : Iron M o untain News , January 12, 1970.

- 17-

�,t

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

annually in the community for household goods , taxes , maintenance, and local
1
travel . While Emmet County may not be New England, the gravity of metropolitan growth in Michigan plus the stature of ski resort and lake attractions,
make the areas comparable .

tory is for seasonal homes , with higher proportions in individual townships.

A major concern with the recreation home is that itbe developed into the lands c ape and des i gned so as to minimize the visual depletion of scenic resources.
Clu ster development concepts will promote this obj ective because it allows dev elopment on a more compact scale with more open space.- around and between
clusters .

I
I

Community utility services also are more feasible by this design

approach .

BROAD SCALE RESOURCE INTERPRETATIONS
The bas i s for much of the County's Recreation Plan is formulated from a review
of existing conditions ,

The Plan takes into consideration :

Regional setting
Existing resource areas (broad scale resource characteristics, potentially
developa ble or not, etc).

I
I
I
I
I

Roughly one-third of the County's housing inven-

Topography
Forests
Marshland
Riv ers , streams and flood plains
Shorelines
Farmlands
Wildlife

1

Department of Interior , Bureau of Outdoor R e creati on, Northern New England
V a c at i on Home Study, 19 6 6 .

-18 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Exi sting recreational facilities
County residents
Tourists

Needs and limitations

The following secti on discusses the resource elements embodied m the Recreation
Plan .

Resource Inventory
The resource inventory 1s an essential step in recreation planning.
likened to a stock investor's working capital.
in part , based upon his present assets .

It may be

That is, his future investment is,

"It is easy to talk about environments in

generalities , but the task of protecting and enhancing the remaining attributes
that provide diversity, requires in the first place, the task of identifying, evaluating and locating the attributes in the real , living landscape.

Without under-

standing where they are, wq.ose back-forty or urban block they are in, the nature
of the owner , in what county, state or nation they are located, etc., little can be
accompl i shed in creating new design criteria for their enhancement, nor implementation tools for their protection." 1

Two i mportant sources of resource information in Emmet County are the U.S.

I
I
I
I
I

I

Soil Conser v ation Service and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
These agencies can provide valuable data and management guidance on soils,
wildlife , fish , rivers and streams , forests and related resources .

Because of

t i me limitations and the scope of this study, the resource inventory as included
in th i s report , is primarily comprised of available basic data supplemented by
a vi s u al reconnaissan c e .

More pre c ise basic data would strengthen the in -

v e ntor y and permit a more factual analysis .

A c tual on site soil investigations

are prerequisi tes f o r every well conceived recreational use, whether for wildlife
management or facility construction .

1 Professor Phillip H . Lewi s, Jr ., Upper Mississippi River Comprehensive Basin
Study, U . S . Department of Inter i or, Nati onal Park Service, 1968 .
- 19-

�..

• •••••••
C £ CI

L

-~
ST(IRGEON

8 A Y

~

'lt,

t

'

(,

~

II

I
I ---,, --

'"; ;
~ li ========i_J[
. j ·I"'r-:7rf"""
!
rl
L
__ l ,
:

---,,----:I ~.

'

C
--1

I

"

IUI

D

"·---'

.JI.

• I

[JI
' [~J.fi ··~-..
I
\

f',,

r-rJ~. \\:
•

----\f ______~

..

-i

. Jr::::\_,. I' ~~ :
• =. ~ I . 1. \ :

"

'

.i

•·--

:!

"-··

i~~---·

I

•

······ ;;:f"osa'·,f-;·-p···

~~~
:\
I
II

.

•

"

~

'

"

yCL .
~

!~
.I

'\ I

I

1

1•jl

..

1:
_..J~
~:::,.=&gt;====" I

~'i. '1o•.•· - "-

i "" "-· .~..

II

~

... ..

- l.. J---,~-·-,;-----~
.. ;i

•

\ ..

l

'

,. - - - - i_

"'
Sc

"
l

I T Tl

£

TRAVERS£

8

A Y

,_,_,._ PRINCIPAL
DEER

DRAINAGE

BASINS

YARDING AREAS

TO P QUALITY
SECOND

TROUT STREAMS

QUALITY

TROUT

a

TRIBUTARIES

STRE AMS

8

TRIBUTARIES

TOP 8 SECOND QUALITY WARM WATER GAME FISH STREAMS

+

_____
......
--·.....______
,.-. ...............
..._
. _..... .... __

...

.... _ , .... , _ ... -

HI - •

,
-·. -............._,.,.,_,.
.,_,..,_,.
,

,.,.,

0
8

_"

.....

vilicon · lemon a assoc. Inc
plonninQ
consultonh

CANOEA BLE

STREAMS

" ,_., ,

. .. _

WITH

LIGHT

RIVERS

DEVELOPMENT

TO HEAVY

DEVELOPMENT

I 12 011 MOR£ D£\IELOPM£JH!I

S E L E C CTQEU D
R E S Q LJ R C E
NT Y

EMMET

STREAMS

t 2 TO II DEVELOf'M[NTS PER MILE I
MEOJUM

~~~t.1:,r,:IY~~,~~;~(\•.T

I

8

DEVELOPMENT

o,

PEIi MILE)

IUTUIIAl

IIUOUl(U , UYlOlltl Ott

INVENTORY

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Resource Characteristics
Some of the landscape characteristics that influence the recreational potentials
of Emmet County are listed below.

These should be viewed as standards to

guide the actual development of recreational attractions.

Historical Characteristics and objects.

Significant in association with past cultures

They stimulate one's imagination as well as remind us of our

pa st heritage.

Relief Characteristics -

Monotony must not prevail.

Whether moving from

city to countryside, forest to farmland, or hill to plains, the transition
should not be filled with clutter but rather delineated by contrast.

Aesthetic Characteristics -

Beauty is sought in many respects whether

scenic vistas, streams, water bodies, yegetation, topography, wildlife or
man ma.de developments.

Scientific and Educational Characteristics -

Features that have far-reaching

value with regard to the evolution of civilizations, bogs, marshes,. and wildlife areas fall into this category as ecological factors.

Archaeological ex-

cavations, geologic formations, and fossil remains must also be included.

Protective Characteristics -

Methods to obtain relief from sun, wind , snow

and rain are sought by man and wildlife.

Shelter belts, forest plantations

and ridges are among those features that make up this resource characteri-stic.

Sentimental Characteristics aside from beauty.

Landmarks and symbols of local significance

Popular affection is a strong factor in perpetuation and

maintenance of many natural and man-made features.

A wood lot, historic

building, scenic overlook, or unusual sign may fall into this category.

- 20-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

-

BROAD SCALE RESOURCES OF EMMET COUNTY

Water
Water is an integral feature in the recreation economy of any area.

Emmet

County not only has 71 miles of Lake Michigan frontage, but also has a wide
selection of rivers, streams and inland lakes.
of surface water in the County.

There are some 10,400 acres

Lake Michigan frontage is important as a factor

in regional tourist drawing power.

Therefore, development along the lake should

be designed to permit observation, public access and retention of its highly
aesthetic image.

Evening sunsets· over Lake Michigan are a particularly scenic

natural phenomena
attraction forces.

Inland la:kes, rivers and streams are secondary regional
However, the nearness of metropolitan centers has given

some inland lake areas prir'nary,attraction fore es ( e. g., Walloon Lake).

Whether for wildlife management purposes or for outdoor recreation activities,
all of the County's water resources must be protected from pollution to retain
its purity and natural environmental image.

Fish and Wildlife
Fish and wildlife resources are fafrly aboundant in Emmet County.

As a recre-

ational activity, -as sanctuary or preserve, as a business or aesthetic setting,
the fish and wildlife are an integral part of Emmet County's environment.

Hence,

wildlife management practices have a direct bearing on tourism recreation and
the tourist economy.

To be most effective, wildlife management practice must be extended to involve
the vast acreages of private recreation land.
the following species:

The wildlife of the County include

white tailed deer, elk, fox, rabbit, grouse, woodcock,

squirrel and waterfowl.

Black bear also inhabit areas of the County.

major fish species · include: Trout, (brown, brook, rainbow and lake),
Salmon, Bass, Bluegills, Perch, Pike, and others.
-21-

Some
Coho

�I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

Government Land
An important recreation resource in any region are state and federal lands.
Although private forest-farm lands fulfill open space and recreation needs, they
are not as permanent as public owned land.

Private lands may move into or out

of recreational use in terms of the economic needs of the moment.

G o vernment

lands, therefore, can be regarded as permanent features of outdoor recreation
and they are more likely to come under Comprehensive Resource Management.

About 100 square miles of land in Emmet County is state owned .

This is roughly

20 percent of the County's land area, and exceeds all local acreage standards for
recreation land needs .

However, the area I s recreation market includes metro-

pol i tan centers in the Midwestern states and Canada, hence, comparisons with
numbers of County residents is distorting .

Topography
The analysis of the County's physiography is limited in respect to detail.

U.S. G. S.

data on a County-wide scale at the 20 foot intervals is effective as a general reference for slope data but cannot illustrate the variety of slope change that can occur
within a given 20 foot interval.

Topography in Emmet County cannot be described in simple terms, since there
is relief variety and contrasts in each of the sixteen ( 16) 'townships.

H o wever,

the predominant steeper slopes may be found in the centra l portions of the County
and in the southeast.

The east and north areas are generally flat, while the

entire west side has slopes ranging £:vom gently rolling to rolling.

Again, m-

stances of different slopes may be found in most regions of the County .

-22-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

Land
Being the northermost County in the Lower Peninsula, Emmet County has a
relatively open character, interesting land forms,
square miles of government land.

scenic woodlands, and many

These combine to establish a "land resource"

that is coming under increasing pressures for recreation - resort development.
As the intensity and density of development increases, the open space character
will diminsh as will the broad scale resources that make the County attractive.
W o od lots will be cleared for building purposes, hills leveled and acreages subdivided into smaller and smaller units .

It also means hunting pres sure, sanitary

and refuse disposal problems, and ecological imbalance conditions.

By and

large the land resource must be protected with zoning, us es encouraged to adopt
progressive development concepts , and community efforts made to place critical
scenic and wildlife resources in public or protective ownership.

The two maps which accompany this section of the County Recreation Plan, inventory the important resource and recreation features of the County.

The map

"Selected Resource Inventory 11 illustrates basic County resources which adapt
to broad scale recreation uses and include deer yard areas, trout streams,
canoeable waters and basic dra i nage patterns.
proposed for broad scale

The map

11

These can be regarded as areas

resource and game management.

Selected Scenic and Recreation Resources 11 inventories specific recre -

ation facilities and areas with potential for recreation development.

Public lands,

state forests , public access sites, local parks and playgrounds are mapped.
addition , special or unique recreation pbtentials are listed.

In

These include such

f e atures as potential impoundment sites, historic interest areas, scenic view
1
areas , and related features with recreation - tourism significance .
lField inventory work was supplemented by preliminary data from the draft report
by the U . S. Soil Conservation Service , An Appraisal of Potentials for Outdoor
Recreational Development, Emmet County, Michigan . Also, the report by : Northwest Michigan Resource Conser v ation and Development Project Steering Committee,
Project Plan, dated 1969, prepared by the U . S. Soil Conservation Service.

- 23 -

�eil

MACK I NAW BRIDGE

HISTORIC FORT

]MI CH ILI MACK INAC

C E CI L

rL~~~'i~~ l
PROJECTS

T.JtN.

STURGEO N

8 A Y

~~ ~t:=~ff--

SAND DUNES&amp;
BEACH RESOURCE

,___JL:

~

I."¥ . . ,
. .~
F"
,.:, ~,ll&lt;'c/J
·
.J:

-,.,_

(I)

•-77 · .-,u---'' •l -

'
·

'

"

ll"Nir-+"SN,, ··
II

II•

~I

II

"

~

i

..11

1

N

•IJLJ
.. ·
.

•

~..,:i

•1j's7'J

.

~

7

'i---:

I

J

;-

,".

u

I

c

"""..

\'~

.

..

·
'...

'--

t,,'"',y..:i&gt;=-.
",,,
(,_,,,,;,iv
..J

•

""

u,"'

'

I

[===+i'
" I-

••

'

.

~~

~-

-

''\ \ "---'--'-'

•

~.~-------

·&lt;•"

~

:~

=7f~~~U~ _J

rec, :c)
"'o
-

·

.77

"'1

•

ts,

•

T 57N

I

L

,

' ••• ..

I

-··

'

~-•
;;::, ;'•..,•l" ·
~- . ,0 v&lt;':Ci
..• .

,.,:i~.)';'~
·4
.
.
'

-~: oJ)&lt;-;.l..

~~~v~
r...
~ I'"- .
Q~tJ~ ✓,

F-~11,I ~1:;,~ • " •'~
tA .,.--£1) ,'l!H I

"rt

I ,~:") '4:
",, ~-t"E.
.• ---

,,

Jt

r
l.

\

1

; \

~~

'v•.

.

-•

,, ,

I(.)',;)~

..

,

· , , ;:,l''if---'";s&lt;'c'.J,,[.i"'.'c"c~
·• ~•',,,-f"•J
C"o~•.'{;~',;\
~•JO·•.di~.•••~
C
,•
' ""'·'
1

IJ

,

=•

,,,-;;; J

k:I
0

..

•-

•;•7

F,-?~l · ··'
(;'1·
l.:&gt;s"
, L:'.:il)'•
')0.. ~ - _J;
I
'
' •C
C:.c-J

I -"
-;!?j ,

·J&gt;'.l)•:!&gt;
· •"'-

•
~-,;~(;"

~

;

I

-t-

~
IL..,..,·J1LJI

u

,~~~ cu : ~J2&lt;;

'

□···~-~-~ _

"~~;·{;6:u~•'J).
II

'

.........,

7n

r-,,,

II

II

I

_J~

'•

11

-

,•,j

•o

I

~L

5~c"'&lt;-,&lt;::~-

~

~2:J,.' · ~ . !'
~ ~

I

I[__ !

·;~I

..

•.

()

"

,I

'1@c\),•

rs 71 s

\

~

~

'v

"

i.

.,

~ ---f'~0~~0,;;""'~~~~
: o,·,···
r •

I

·"'''- ,.r

·p

~(;v'

..

L

,

slJy;:_ ,-

'&lt;'

~

.

:

.. If~~ ~

"

□

"tJ:_b
' ·.1l .....•

B

'?-

U.ol M. FOREST
H!~foR.fH

.,,,,~

.

. , • .'&lt;C
N

P -- r·-

I\ •

=&gt;=--'

11

;) ,:'
· " n i,,,

II

..

._,-~ul ;

-,--

A

I

__J~ I

•

l JL_J,I •JI-

R

/o•
\

-;,
!'

l

•

J

1 11 V

I

"

~-

r---,

LJ

~

E

,'l

,~,

::
l{J-~;----

..

1/

E-.
_J

_"___ _, 'INLAND

--

-t- ,_J;;t

fu•'

.

,

l

7

,;►i'-.&gt;cc:.~ .ll
·J~J:.~~~-j
'ti

L

WATER

..!!.Q.J!.TE
rC~R~O~O~K~E~D~

~:l[~---J~ •
-~ITT!
,,,. ""'"'"'
-·~LJl ::~gm\

I~"

l
:

T. .MN

RP';

~h~.-.r ~--

\.- ,=-..o

"""'-

1'\/J 111

...

• I

i'LJ
:

• •,1

-

---

11

p

'~·;,_"~~ r-.:-=--

'

---,

~I. -,l~ ._jLJ

,-,,

,. " r
L]'' .--~ :~"f
. /...
,\~~:II
I..\L... I
'

...,. ~

J4

j-j.I,...~

.) ~. ~.,~~,,)

~
-

1,h=:-'&gt;~

~~'°'!,:

t C'

, •

.

.

JJ

[_

RIVER

H

LOCKS

&lt;.q;_ ') ~v I""_~

....

G

""

~~~!T

,,:

T 35N

.
I

-.J

i

.di

I

I

~

.

I
I

t
I

C

~NRTUEST

nc=.=-:)W ._;

~-=·J:

~:in

..LJ . .J~~1,-~ ~, . L~. _Tl E I
slo jw
.

jr::r

R

•

"1r.----G:_].
,r 8 ,

i

••

T

.......

~, . ,
.
··'

•

J~[l□

· 1·

. ..

~

11

·

~

/4;:,. ,

l .•

~~

..

I

;

H

1
_
r.lC.,v--J,c ~LE~E!~
'

L

J.~~

~
I
I
I

'-~

1 .d

,· V

•

.

.

e." -

. ,
,o

I

~

::,, 0

&lt;&gt;6

&gt;': ,,.J

I . ,,,t:;·
:-

T 54N.

.

i

h·L.· !

1/ ~

~

'

-

I

- ·fl

~ L--1--rLJ~, .~~~r:r:J·

R. 6W.

"

~v

!I

~
HARLEVOIX

~

"itti~(E__-

I j:

~~·Ji,
1rf:•?J

\~\

,/''

0

...

-,:;

..

,-+

.

·

,. ,,

1,

-~\l_

.

•

'\1(1

j

"
'
·
DD
-. 0 jd~~
rr·
J:\ .

i~~~l.~:

I. \L. l. ~
-. \ ~.3
~~~l46JL
II

AR

~

••

LJC~~ ' -

-j1 . ' ""'

. JL_

~... IJL:_J\ .·JH

HISTORIC II
GEOLOGIC

~

1 ~~ O"; ,1,
4'""'

i

"'

...

* ~;-'Jt\.~I
0

"

RECREATION LA NO RESOURCES

CJ

PUBLIC LAN OS (COUNTY, MUNiCiPAllTY, II SCHOOL)

~

STATE FOR EST

*

- TIil Pl0AIArl0N

o,

1KIS C-,VMIC

..

~

•

W_.S f!NANCIAUY

AIDlO THI O UGH A FIOU_.,l GIANI ,_0,._ !Hf 00,UHtUll
t&lt;O'JIIHG ANO un... N OfVHO,NfHT. UNDU !Hf UI•
UN ,lANNUtG AUllUNU ,1oou-. AUI HOIIUO n
llC TIOH 701 o, Tt&lt;f "OUSIHGACT Of lf&gt;• , A) 1'""lHOlD
AO/IIINlllfUO IY THl #l CIUGAN 01, .... ,,.,tH Of cO ... M!UL~

o,

u

SOOD

IOOO

IOOCI

""' .. ....

vilican . ieman a assoc. inc.
planning
ca n1ullanll

PUBLIC ACCESS SITES II ROADSIDE PARKS
PARKS II PLAYGROU NDS (SCHOO L SiTES - 5 )
SCENIC ViEW RESOURCES
MAJOR PRIVATE II SEMi·PRIVATE RECREATION

S e Ie c t e d

Is C E N I C a RECREATION
EMMET

COUNT y

RESOURCES

11

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

The recreation features on the scenic and recreation resource map should also
be regarded as proposed recreation developments, subject to feasibility analysis
and implementation.

-24 -

�COUNTY

RECREATION ANALYSIS
Local Dimension

�I
I
I
I

LOCAL

The Comprehensive Recreation Plan -for Emmet County must also consider local
demands for recreational facilities.

While it is true that broad scale recreational

resources are critical elements of tourism-recreation, local community environment, and economic development, measures of local service needs are also

I

presented.

I
I
I
I

CONCEPTS AND STANDARDS

I

RECREATION DIMENSIONS

Specific types of recreational facilities in a community may vary appreciably from
facilities found in another.

Population numbers, resources, tourist demands,

philanthropic bequests, advance planning, and citizen attitudes all bear on the
quality of a given park and recreation system.

Even though there are differences

in recreation systems, there are some basic facilities which serve all communities.

These include:

Home Yard
Assured through zoning, the home yard is an important recreational facility for

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

the pre- school aged child.

It also accommodates outdoor family activities.

Yard sizes vary.

Tot Lots
In high density residential areas and mobile home courts, tot lots usually contain
space for games, limited apparatus, a sand box and benches for supervisory
adults.

Size varies with available space.

Playgrounds
Usually adjacent to the elementary school, playgrounds serve elementary school
age children and may contain:

Playground apparatus, a shelter area and rest

rooms, open space for active play, paved areas and perhaps a tot lot area.
2 to 5 acres, plus 1 acre per 100 pupils.

Size:

A minimum of 3. 5 acres when a school

is included.

- 25-

�I
I
I
I
I

Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks are intended to serve residential areas in a community.

They

are often combined with playground sites and are an excellent means for preserving natural features in subdivision areas.

These facilities are characteristically

quiet and emphasize landscaping, walkways, open lawns and scenic beauty.

Size:

one acre per 1, 000 population.

I

The accompanying illustration portrays the heighborhood -·schbol-park . conc~pt.

I

Playfields
Oriented toward the recreational needs of high school age and adult age citizens,

I

I
I

playfields are developed to meet the active recreational demands of the community.
Ball diamonds, athletic fields and recreation buildtngs are typical playfield uses.
Often these facilities are located in conjunction with a high school.

Community Parks

less space for other required facilities.

I

Regional Parks

I
I

'
~

10 acres

minimum, plus 1 acre per 100 pupils.

I
I
I
I

Size:

Intended to serve all community groups, especially the family, community parks
offer diverse recreational facilities and strive to preserve or enhance outstanding
natural features.

Typical. facilities may include swimming, picnicking, scenic

views, landscaping and similar attractions.

Size:

1 acre per 100 population,

Regional parks serve persons from a wide geographic area and may be developed
to include some community park functions, but usually emphasize resources and
conservation.

State, national and county parks typify regional parks which pre-

serve nature, offer camping, have outstanding scenic views, and/ or afford
hunting, fishing, winter sports, etc.

Size varies by type of facility, sponsor,

regional demands for park space, and the nature of the facility.

- 26-

�......................... ______ _
,.__....__ P A R K - - - - - - - - -

PARK

B~:~·p-~~
FIELD SPORTS AREA

GREEN AREA
FAMILY AREA
PICNIC A ~
QU IET RE
10

BASEBALL
BASKETBALL
VOLLEY BALL
TENNIS

u

0

rz II IT11 IJ 11

uuSCHOOL

NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL-PARK CONCEPT

I

vilican-leman
planning

a

assoc. inc.
consultants

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

COUNTY POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Emmet County had a total population of 15, 904 per sons in 19 60.
to increase to about 18,000 persons in 1970.

This is estimated

By 1990, the total County may have

22, 500 citizens depending on the success in attracting additional jobs in industry,
retailing, and tourism recreation.

Because of tourism recreation the County

Recreation Plan assumes importance beyond that of providing local recreation
services and facilities.

In 1959, the median family income in Emmet County was reported to be $4, 694.
This compares with a Michigan average of $6, 256, which was 33. 2 percent higher
than the County median.

Although ten years out of date, it is reasonable to con-

clude that an income gap still exists between the state average income and the
County average.

The income of tourists and families who visit the County for

recreation purposes is probably well above the County average.

The population density of Emmet County varies significantly from one area to
another.

For each resident, there are 16. 2 acres of land in the County,

How-

ever, in certain village and city locations (selected blocks) the density equals any
typical Midwestern . community.

The overall density question is distorted some by

the influx of large numbers of summer-winter tourists who compete with local
residents for land resources.

The age group structure of the County indicates some imbalance with general
state trends.

Significant differences include :

(a) higher proportion of ;persons

over 64 years of age ; (b) slightly higher proportion of persons in the mature
family group (ages 45 to 64); (c) a low proportion of young and middle aged
families (ages 25 to 44); (d) slightly more persons in the school age group; and
(e) fewer pre-school children.

For the pµrpose of long-range planning, the recre-

ation service must consider all population groups regardless of the community
age profile in any given year.

Individual projects, however, may emphasize ser-

vice to a given age group, depending upon available financing, citizen desires,
and/or basic lack of facilities for that age group.
-27-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

I
I
I
I
I

INVENTORY AND DEMAND
A general measure of recreation need 1s the standard figure of 1 acre per 100
population.

If this formula is employed in Emmet County, there would be a

recreation land need for 180 acres of community-neighborhood park land.

This

would increase to perhaps 225 acres by 1990.

There are 405 . 0 acres of local park and school recreation land in Emmet County.
All of this land is owned by local governmental units in the County as there are
no County owned parks .

In addition, there are 7, 273. 1 acres of land in major

regional parks (e . g. Wilderness State Park), roadside parks, public access sites
and related recreation resources.

State lands, largely in the Wilderness State

Forest contain some 90 square miles of land .

It is noted that the existing local

park acreage is the estimated area of use and not necessarily the total land owned
by the community.

There are another 2, 755. 7 acres of recreation land in

private and semi - private ownership, plus private cottages, ski chalets, recreation farms, and hunting acreage.

The population- acreage ratios readily point up the inadequacy of attempts to
apply a ratio standard to ascertain basic facility needs.
tials are immense ;

Open space park poten-

hence, the local recreation need will largely relate &lt;--l d 'i.m-

proved parks, expanded parks and structural facilities for recreation.

However,

added local park purchases or acquisitions should be encouraged as a means '. to
preserve natural resources and potential recreation sites that might otherwise
be lost.

For the purpose of recreation planning and the County-wide Land Use

Inventory, the park acreages listed on 'TABLE : 2,
Inventory'' apply .

- 28-

, "Public Recreation Land

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

TABLE
PUBLIC RECREATION

2
LAND INVENTORY

Emmet County

Communities
1.

2.

Bear Creek
Township

Bliss
Township

Recreation
Feature

Recreation Acreage by Ty:ee
Local
Regional
Total

Senior High School
29.0
Rotary Park
Roadside Park (US 131)
Bay View Parks
Petoskey State Park
Round Lake Public Access---

2. 9
3. 5
16. 6
273.0
2. 0

29.0

298.0

Wilderness State Park
Township Park

6,925.0
34.7
34. 7

3.

Carp Lake
Township

Public Access Paradise
Lake
Lincoln Park
2 Roadside Parks

Center
Township

Larks Lake Public
Access
Youth Center
Ballfield (Larks Lake)

Cross Village
Township

Boat Ramp on Lake
Michigan
Wy Camp Lake Public
Access
Cross Village Park
(Historical)
Cross Village School

2.0
2. 2

53.3

5. 0
.5
5.5
5.0

11. 0

2.0
2. 0
. 2
1.0
1.0

-29-

6,959.7

.2

6.0
5.

6,925.0

51. 1
51. 1

4.

327.0

4.2

5.2

�TABLE 2 Continued

[

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Local
6.

Friendship
Township

Roadwide Park

Regional
1.0
1.0

7.

Little Traverse
Township

Conway Beach
Conway Ballfield

Littlefield
Township and
Alanson

Alanson School
Playground near School
Alanson Ballfield
Alanson Roadside Park
and Tennis Court
Alanson Public Fishing
Oden Roadside Park
Oden Lake Access
Oden Park
Oden Ballfield
Pickerel Lake Public
Access-

ship, Pellston
(pt. ) ' Brutus and
Levering

Pellston High School
Pellston Auditorium
Public Access on River
Pellston Elementary
School

2.5
.5

.p
.3
.1
4.0
2. 0

Pellston Field
Perhton Tennis Courts
Roadside Park

11 . Pleasantview
Township

None

23.6

2. 0
4.0
2. 0

8. 5

1. 0
1. 0

7.3

6.0
.3
6.3

-30-

3.4

2. 1
.4

6.5
10 . Maple River
Township ,
Pellston (pt.),
and Van

2.5

7. 0
2. 5
4. 1

20.2

9. McKinley Town-

1. 0

.5
2. 0
2. 5

8.

Total

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

TABLE

2 Continued

Local
12 . Readmond
Township

Lake Michigan Park
Historic Park (Council
Tree)
Roadside Park

1.5
.5
2.0

1.0
3.0
4.0

Wawatam
Township

14.0

1.0
4.0

Pickeral Lake Access
2 - Public Access

5.0
15.

12.0

10.0

10. 0
14. Springvale
Township

Total

10.0

10.0
13. Resort Township Resort School
Waloon Lake Access
Roadside Park - US-31

Regional

Cecil Bay Park
2.5
(Mackinaw City)
High School
17.7
Michilimackinac Park
Cecil Bay Public Access
(State)
French Farm Lake Public
Access

5.0

15. 3

3.0
2. 0

20.2

20.3

40.5

Total Townships and Villages
Total City of Petoskey
Total Harbor Springs

197.5
147.4
60. 1

7, 273 . 1

7,470.6
147.4
60. 1

Grand Totals

405.0

7, 273. 1

7, 678. 1

16. West Traverse
Township

None

SOURCE:
Vilican - Leman &amp; Associates, Inc. Land Use Inventory, Emmet County, Summer
1968, and aerial photographs.

-31-

�LOCAL RECREATION PLAN
Statistically, there is a sizeable local park surplus in Emmet County, both under
current population levels and foreseeable projections through 1990.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

statistical needs are not equally divided among the local units of government.
Hence , the conclusions drawn from TABLE 3 should be related to individual communities rather than from column totals .

The TABLE 3 "Local Recreation Needs" , shows that the local recreation surplus
i s mainly the result of large acreages in Bear Creek, Bliss and Carp Lake Townships .

The Cities of Petoskey and Harbor Springs also reflect large surplus

acreages .

Between 1970 and 1990, local park needs will be felt in the Townships

of Cross Village , Friendship, Maple River, Pleasantview, Resort, Springvale and
West Traverse .

Following is an outline of local recreation developments that may be pursued.
The locations of specific features are presented on the County recreation plan
map titled ''Proposed Recreation Features.

11

There are two predominant recreation development recommendations that apply
to all communities within the County, as well as the County.

1.

These are:

Develop parks, improve parks and provide recreation services to satisfy
the needs of all age groups.

2.

Acquire , promote, and/or assist in the reservation and preservation of
outstanding natural resources that exist in the County.

These involve

scarce waterfront lands , scenic timber stands, unique topography, wildlife habitat areas and the like .

- 32 -

f

However, the

�- TABLE

._.

._._.

- -

3

LOCAL RECREATION NEEDS
Emmet County
Community or Local
Recreation Acreage Needs
Community_
1.

I

w
w
I

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12 .
13 .
14 .
15 .
16 .

Existing Acreage

Bear Cre·ek Township
Bliss Township
Carp Lake Township
C e nter Township
Cros.s Village T ownship
Friendshi p Tow nship
Little Traverse Township
Littlefield Township &amp; Alanson
McKinley Township &amp; Pellston (pt)
Maple River Township &amp; Pellston (pt)
Pleasantview Township
R e admond Township
R e s o rt Township
Springvale T ownship
Waw atam and Mackinaw City (pt)
West Traverse Township
Sub Totals

17.
18 .

City of Petoskey
City o f Harbor Spr i ngs
Totals

1

29. 0 acres
34.7
51. l

6. 0
1.0

2.5
20.2
6.5
6.3
10.0
10 . 0
20 . 2

197 . 5 acres
147 . 4
60 . 1
405. 0 acres

1990 Need 1

1990

Surplus(+)
Deficit(-)

50. 5 acres
2. 5
5.8
1.0
1.4
3. 2
7. 7
10. 4
8.4
3. 4
2. 0
2. 5
23 . 8
5. 7
4. 5
4.0

- 21. 5 acres
+ 32 . 2
+ 45.3
+ 5. 0
.4
- 3. 2
+ 5. 2
+ 9. 8
- 1.9
+ 2. 9
- 2. 0
+ 7. 5
- 13.8
- 5. 7
+ 15.7
- 4. 0

136.8acres

+ 71. 1 acres

75. 2
17. 5
229. 5 a c .1· e s

+ 72 . 2
+ 42.6
+ 185 . 9 acres

T o wnshi ps w ith a proje c t e d p o pulat i on decline show a 1990 need based upon th e 19 6 0 populat ion .

�Bear Creek Townshlp - Project-ions show a mlnlmum need for 21 . 5 acres of local
recreat l on land by 1990 .

Th-is is a local need that should be provlded for general

Townshl p recreatlon purposes and does not relate to nelghborhood needs dlscussed

I

-in the Petoskey Area Plan .

Some development objectives that should be pursued

are :

I
I
I

1.

A cqulre the federally owned radar stat-ion property in Sect-ion 23 for
recreation and general community use. Th-is fadlity is in an excellent
recreation resource area .

2.

Encourage the development of hlstorical and cultural features, that
characterlze the area, and speclfically the proposed Indian Museum and
Indian Cultural Center near the Petoskey State Park .

3.

Work with the state agendes and adjacent communitles to promote canoeing
o n the Bear River . A potential impoundment of the Bear River would also
create opportunitles £or township park development.

4.

It appears that the Townshlp could use some community ballfields, outdoor
skating rinks and related community recreation features . The only local
recreation feature i s the high school, and this serves more than the Township area .

5.

Some suggested locatl ons for specific active community recreation features
are :
Near the Townsh ip Hall
As a buffer between resldentlal lands and the buslnes s us es on
Mitchell Road at Divi s -ion
On Pickerel Lake Road at a trans-it-ion po i nt with the proposed freeway,
proposed industrial area , and/or trailer housing areas .
With planned school locations

I
I
I
I

On the s i tes of larger community and reg i onal parks

- 34 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

Locations to consider for general community parks, that may or may not
have active sport features include :
In the Bear River Valley area
On Round Lake to preserve open space
Among scenic wood lots, forested -ar,eas and rolling hills in the
community - as at the radar site
On hillsides or sites offering outstanding panoramic views such as
from US-131 south of Petoskey and from Pickerel Lake Road
Bliss Township -

Statistically Bliss Township will have a substantial local park

surplus by 1990, as projections indicate that the permanent population will remain
stable or decline somewhat.

The 30 acre park on Lake Michigan provides ample

recreation space according to standards, however, some recreation projects may
include the following :

1.

Encourage the state to expand W_i..lderness State Park southward to include
the sand dune areas along the Lake Michigan beach. This scenic, sandwooded area is unsuited to small lot subdividing because of the erosion
hazards from the sand dunes. It is also a valuable area-wide natural resource and tourist attraction. There are some 2 miles of beach that should
go into regional park ownership, be it federal, state, county or township.
Cottages could be developed in planned clusters off of the immediate beach
area.
From 2 to 10 acres of land should be provided for local recreation use
(ballfields, skating, sledding, etc . ) . This should be in a central location,
perhaps in the vicinity of the Township Hall or in Bliss Center .

3.

Consider other recreational facilities oriented toward Wy Camp Lake,
e x isting publicly owned lands (state or county) and scenic topographic
features .

-35-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Carp Lake Township - This community has a relatively low total population, but
receives large numbers of tourists in the summer months.

tour i st attraction, has a large number of private and tourist accommodations.
Some recreational projects may include :

1.

Retain the 50 acre Lincoln Park site on Paradise Lake in public ownership ,
and add recreation facilities in the nature of a general community park.
Minimize tree cutting to retain its natural character and improve access
roads into the site .

2.

Protect the scenic recreation and resource potentials of Carp River.
is a valuable canoe water and fishing stream.

3.

Poor soils on the south shore of Paradise Lake (Sec. 23) suggest that residential - cottage development be avoided so as to control sanitary pollution
to the lake and shorelands . This area should be used £or wildlife management purposes , as well as to retain some open space image on a lake that
is now used very intensively. Public ownership or scenic easements are
two methods of retaining the open space character.

4.

Because there are no improved local recreation areas 1n the Township, it
would be desirable to develop some general recreation areas £or active
type sports. This may be done at Lincoln Park, although undesirable tree
cutting may be necessary, or space could be provided near the Township
Hall, which is in a more central location.

5.

A future park- recreation area may be established with·9- potential water 1mpoundment on Carp Creek .

Center Township possible declines.

I
I

Paradise Lake, a big

This

Center Township is sparsely populated, and projections show
I£ so there will be a 5. 0 acre park surplus by 1990.

1.

Ma i ntain and impro v e the community ballfield near Larks Lake. Other
active sports facilities may be developed at the Youth Center and/or
the Township Hall. More diversified recreation apparatus could also be
provided.

2.

I£ the Township i s able , acquire land on Larks Lake to preserve open space
and scenic resources for local residents , cottage owners and visitors. Enco u rage cluster cottage development concepts. Seasonal home markets will
accrue from access potentials to canoeable waters, ski resorts, and open
space areas.

- 36 -

�3.

Local and community recreation services may be provided at the Township
gravel pit , as a re - use of community resources.

4.

Protect the natural and scenic qualities of the Maple River. It is a canoeable
trout stream that should not be polluted, or over developed with vacation
homes .

Cross Village Township - Relating population to available or potential recreation
land at the Cross Village School , no significant added local recreation area is
indicated .

1.

Either at the school or on church property in the Village, recreation apparatus,
ice skating ponds and related active play facilities can be provided to meet
local demands,

2.

The outstanding scenic views of Lake Michigan suggest that efforts be made
to keep vistas from the highway open for scenic drive reasons. Scenic
easements and/or government owned land can meet this need.

3.

Cross Village has the potential to develop a marina and harbor on Lake
Michigan . A marina would be an excellent complementary facility to
the scenic beach.

4.

Either through state , county or township resources, the sandy beach area in
and near the Cross Village harbor area should be developed for recreation
purposes , emphasizing scenic and open space characteristics. Some facilities and recreation apparatus could still be established.

5.

Other recreation opportunities may relate to Wy Camp Lake and/or -future
re - use of the Township's sanitary fill area for recreation.

6.

Encourage the restoration, reconstruction or replica development of Cross
Village during the early Missionary - Indian Era (cir. 1700 - 1850) . This
could be a highly interesting focal point for tour i st visitation and would preserve a valuable cultural heritage .

Friendshi p Township -

The only public recreation area m Friendship Township

is a small roadside park near Middle Village .

As a minimum, standards suggest

a need for 3 . 0 acres of recreation area by 1990 .

- 37 -

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•

1.

Work to acquire frontage on Lake Michigan for township park-recreation
purposes , as well as to acquire lands which are becoming increasingly
scarce, Public access to Lake Michigan should be reserved before the
frontage is lotted ofL

2.

Active sports recreation area for Township residents is being provided in
part by the Five Mile Creek Community Center, formed by a group of
citizens, General public recreation sites may be developed at the Township
Hall location, near Stutsmanville, or in the vi:cinity of the co1nmunity building,

3,

The Township owns 80 acres of land one mile south of the Township Hall.
This is an excellent potential recreation area. It is wooded, has gently
rolling topography, and is at the base of a very rugged topographic area,
that probably should be in broad scale recreation - open space use .

4.

Other recreation potentials may be developed among the numerous scenic,
topographic and wooded areas of the community .

Little Traverse Township -

Based upon the 1990 projected population Little

Traverse Township may need at least 5. 2 acres of added recreation area.

All

existing local recreation area is in Conway, and includes a small beach access
on Crooked Lake and a ball field along the railroad .

Residents and tourists in Little Traverse have access to recreational facilities
in Harbor Springs, Bear Creek Township and Petoskey.

The Township also

borders the private ski resorts in Pleasantview Township to the north .

Local recreation may include the following :

1.

Expand equipment and land near existing parks, and/or consider the development of a new community park for active play (5 to 10 acres).

2,

Attempt to acquire recreation land or access easements to Little Traverse
Bay , This will enhance local recreational opportunities and preserve
outstanding scenic resources .

-38 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

J

3.

A scenic community park can be developed in and near state owned lands
in the center of Section 11 off the Chadderdon Road. Rolling topography,
wooded areas and large open space can be adapted to a variety of recreation
services.

4.

Other recreation sites may be developed in conjunction with the Township
Hall or other community buildings that may be provided in future years .

5.

If the Township develops into an urban area, some small neighborhood parks
may be necessary to serve smaller areas.

Littlefield Township and Alanson -

Elementary school and playground facilities

in Alanson, and a ballfield north of Oden give the residents of Littlefield Township
a fairly good recreation inventory.

According to projections there will still be a

9. 8 acre park surplus by 1990 .

Some local recreation objectives may include :

1.

Continued improvements and expansions at the four local park-playground
facilities in Alanson. If the areas population increases substantially
beyond projected levels some additional neighborhood recreation sites may
be needed.

2.

Although there are several parks, the individual facilities are on comparatively small sites (except the school), ranging from. 1 to 4. 1 acres.
Hence , new recreation services may require additional la:rid areas.

3.

New recreation facilities may be expanded on one or both of the large
school land ownerships ( 120 acre tract and 68 acre tract). These would
provide ample acreage to meet foreseeable demands and both have a good
central location .

4.

As a means to protect floodplain areas and low lands near Crooked Lake,
Pickerel Lake and along the Crooked River, attempt to acquire scenic
easements and/or public ownership of the lands in question. This will
increase open space resources as well as act to reduce lak:e - river
pollution possibilities .

5.

The sanitary fill site north of Oden may prove satisfactory for recreation
usage after fill operations are completed.

J

J

- 39-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

6.

Encourage recreation developments in relationship with the Crooked River's
potential and use as an inland water route to Che9oygan.

7.

A special feature with tourist appeal is the State Fish Hatchery west of
Oden and the historical marker dedicated to the now extinct Passenger
Pigeon.

McKinley Township and Pellston (part) -

About half or more of Mckinley Town-

ship is in government owned l a nd, including state forests, University of Michigan
forest research lands, and the County Airport.

The Township also contains the

populated areas of Pellston Village, Brutus, and Levering.

All of the local recre-

ation acreage is associated with school buildings, including an auditorium facility
in Pellston.

By 1990, there will still be a statistical recreation land surplus of

3 . 1 acres.

1.

The Pellston High School, new Pellston Elementary School, and the Pellston
ballfield and tennis court provide a variety of existing recreation services
(ballfield and tennis courts are in the Maple River Township portion of
Pellston Village.) These recreation services are among the more diverse
available to non-city residents in the County. Facility improvements and
expansions should be promt:&gt;ted at each existing facility, because they are
in areas of local population concentration. Because the Leve ring School
has been closed, a small play area should be developed to serve this area
of the Township.

2.

The small communities of Van and Levering have no public recreation area.
However, a small park area for casual recreation use, ice skating~ etc.,
may be desirable to serve families in these areas.

3.

Broader scale recreation developments should include promotional efforts
to protect G-anoeable' waters and trout streams from pollution and over
development.

4.

A potential water impoundment exists on Van Creek and may be a good
source for establishing a general community recreation area.

5.

Promote the development of historical features, perhaps reconstructing
features of the old lumbertown in Pellston.

-40-

�::..---=--·-,-_

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

Maple River Township and Brutus - Maple River Township has experienced past
population declines, but some stability or slight growth may prevail through 1990 .
If so , the community recreation inventory should be held to the existing acreage
and perhaps increased.

All existing local recreation sites are in Pellston Village

(ballfield and tennis courts), since the Brutus school was closed and sold.

1.

The Township Hall at Brutus is in good central location, and active recreation facilities may be satisfactorily provided at this location. This could
replace the recreation services of the former Brutus School.
Local recreation facilities may also be provided on Maple River Road
and/or Woodland Road,, as these are populated Township areas. There is
very little state owned land in the Township.
School district and county forest lands along the Maple River, and the Town~
ship ' s sanitary fill area are resources for possible recreation use and
development.
A broad scale recreation objective should be to protect the Maple River
from pollution and over development. This is a canoeable water and quality
trout stream o f importance to local residents and visitors . Most of the
r i ver courses through private lands, hence, zoning standards should be
established to offer some minimum protection to the resource . Similar
protection should include the Crooked River.

Pleasantview Township -

Some two-thirds of Pleasantview Township is rn state

forest and ma j or ski resort ownership .

Hence, the community supports a very

h i gh volume tourist population which includes skiers, hunters, fisherm:en, snowmobilers and motorists .

The demands on land resources are high and increasing

rapidly .

In contrast to the high tourist visitation, Pleasantview Township is one of the
smallest communities in the County , showing a statist i cal need for only 2 . 0 acres
of local recreation land by 1990.

At present , there are no official local public

parks .

- 41 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

L

In view of the population total and the vast areas of state forest land, there
may be no need for local park facilities during the planning periodo However,
some community recreation play area ought to be available and the minimum
2 o 0 acre need may be a reasonable goaL

2o

Future local recreation area may be provided at the Township Hall location;
this being a central geographi c locationo Local active play areas may also
be dev eloped at the Chalet Village communiti es near Nubs Nob and Boyne
Highlands.

3o

Broad scale recreation objectives relate to the protection of the Maple River
(q u ality trout water), su.·stenanc~· ; of deer yarding areas and other wildlife
habitats.

4.

The Harbor Springs School District owns lfi&gt;0 acres of land west of Boyne
Highlands . This tract borders the ski resort and state forest lands and
could provide recreational opportuni ties to Pleasantview, Little Traverse
and West Traverse Townships .

Readmond Township -

South of Cross Village, Readmond Township has frontage

o n Lake Michigan which has attracted numerous cottages along the shoreline.

A

.fa i r proportion of the Township is in state forest ownership.

Although there are many tourists who visit the community, the permanent popula ti on has declined in past years and only favorable conditions will prev,ent further
declines through 1990.

Readmond Township maintains one of the very few local parks on Lake Michigan,
outs i de of Petoskey and Harbor Springs.

Statistically the community will have

s u rpl u s local recreation acreage through 19900

L

Impro v e and add fa c ilities to the Lakefront Township Park. If possible,
attempt to keep the park in a natural character , emphasizing trails and
broad s c ale recreation uses . E x pand park frontage on Lake Michi gan
as £ea sible .

- 42 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

2.

Provide active type recreational uses at off- the - lake sites in the Township.
(Ballfields , skating areas , playgrounds, etc .) . Some locations may relate
to state owned land, private lands possibly bequeathed to the Township, or
by local citizen groups . A good central location would be with the Township
Hall .

3.

Promote broad scale recreat i on concepts in terms of game management,
shorel ine protection , and pollution control.

4,

Encourage the maintenance restoration and accessibility of cultural h i stor i cal features related to Indian populations and early missionary
act i vities .

Resort Township -

By 1990 , Resort Township may be the third mo st populous

c ommunity in the County and therefore will generate comparatively large demands
for recreational services.
acres by 1990 .

Stati stically, there may be a park land deficit of 13. 8

Existing recreation services are provided by the Resort Sc-hool and

larger parks in Petoskey,

Currently , there is only one small public access site

on Walloon Lake and none on Lake Michigan.

Resort Township Recreation Plan entails the following :

1.

For general Township recreation, the acreage requirements by 1990 may
be satisfied by expandi ng the school site. An active sports recreation area
may also be located with the fiTe station on Intertown Road.

2.

Long range neighbIDrhood recreation areas should be developed in terms
of the recommendations of the Petoskey Area Plan . Parks may be sited
with elementary schools , unless there are scenic natural features (woods,
waters , topograpp.y, etc.), in the neighborhood that should be reserved as
public open space.

3.

In an effort to broaden the recreational resources of the community, seek
to acquire park- recreation areas in one or all of the following locations :
On Little Traverse Bay, at the north end of Townline Road
On Walloon Lake , perhaps in the vicinity of the Manthei Veneer Mill

- 43 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

On the north end of Walloon Lake at the south extremity of Cemetery
Road
Enlargement of the public access site on Walloon Lake at ResortPike Road,
Other scenic Township areas with a potential for diversified outdoor
recreation , preferably to serve all seasons of the year.

4.

Protect the scenic image of the T o wnship and the broad scale resource
areas for wildlife management and large scale outdoor recreation of a
passive nature,

5.

A second potential recreation resource oriented to Little Traverse Bay
may involve future land re-claimed from quarrying activities by the
Penn-Dixie Corp , This is a long term future possibility.

Springvale Township -

This community is expected to have a slight to moderate

increase in population through 1990 ,

Major recreation resources include state

forest land, Pickerel Lake, and the Minnehaha River,

Currently, there are no

Township park facilities and there will be a statistical need for 5, 7 acres by
1990,

L

Local park and recreation area may be developed near Epsilon to achieve
a good central location, A facility on Ellsworth Road or east Pickerel
Lake Road would also be near populated areas.

2.

In order to enhance public access to broad scale recreation resources,
park and recreation areas should be provided on Pickerel Lake and/ or
Crooked Lake, Existing state public access sites on these lakes could
be enlarged,

3,

Protect the Minnehaha River from over de v elopment and pollution, Estab lish scenic corridors along the river to retain the natural scenic attractions
for canoeists and fishermen,

4,

Reserve some rolling topograhpic areas for local recreation - hiking,
sledding, etc , Some steeper slope areas may have ski resort potential.

- 44 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

'

Wawatam Township and Mackinaw Village -

Modest population increases have

been projected for the Wawatam - Mackinaw community.

With existing local

recreation areas, this will leave a 15. 7 acre surplus by 1990.

Community

recreation areas now include Mackinaw City's park on Cecil Bay and the Mackinaw
High School.

Well over half of the Township's land area is in state forest land,

and the principal access to Wilderness State Park is through the Township.

L

The nature of Wawatam Township in terms of projected growth, land use,
land ownership and traffic pattern suggest that there are no basic local
recreation deficiencies. Moreover , the major portion of the local recreation demand can be met with facilities in Mackinaw Village.

2,

Local recreational facilities in Mackinaw Village may be increased if the
rate of population growth increases and new industry is attracted into the
area. Neighborhood parks and community recreation areas should then be
provided in accessible locations.
On the basis of broad scale recreational resources, additional park
land should be acquired on Cecil Bay, before it is entirely subdivided.
Seasonal home subdivisions should then be designed in cluster developments off the immediate shore areas.

4.

Other community recreation may be developed on the state owned lands,
school forests , and perhaps on former sanitary fill lands. The Township
owns 125 acres of land north of French Lake that has broad recreation use
potential.

5.

Tourist recreation in the Wawatam - Mackinaw community is greatly enhanced by Fort Michilimackinac. This outstanding historical attraction is
an authentic re-creation of the old fort community and is a model culturalhistorical-educational facility. Mackinaw Island, the Mackinaw Bridge,
Wilderness State Park, and the Straits of Mackinaw combine with the iFort
attraction into a major tourist complex.

6.

Broad scale recreation resources in the area can contribute to tourist
stayi ng power. Frenchman ' s Lake in Wawatam Township is the site of a
wildlife flooding project and proposed state campgrounds. The Carp Lake
Riv er should be protected as a canoeable trout stream and vacation activity
area . Most of the Township is important as a deer yarding region.

- 45 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

West Traverse Township -

Because there are no public parks, West Traverse

Township will have a statistical need for 4. 0 acres of community parks by 1990.
Actual acreage need could go beyond this if the Harbor Springs community experience substantial amounts of new growth.

This could necessitate one

or two

neighborhood parks.

Tourist visitation and seasonal home developments are quite advanced in the
Township.

The Land Use Inventory showed 135 seasonal homes and 110 one

family homes.

The community's ready access to ski resorts, harbor facilities

and state forests makes it attractive for recreation.

Also, there are scenic woods,

some steep topographic areas, and panoramic views over Little Traverse Bay.

Some local recreation actions may include:

1.

Provision of open space resources in developing residential areas to:
break-up the urban pattern, provide neighborhood play areas (sledding,
skating, picnicing, etc.), protect scenic resource areas in their natural
or wilderness images.

2.

Attempt to secure Lake Michigan frontage for Township recreation uses.
Open land along the shoreline is scarce and it may take years to establish
a significant public open space resource on the Lake.

3.

Consider developing a central community recreation area in one or more
of the following locations : (a) the 80 acre Emmet County Winter Park
(privately owned) in Section 3, if it becomes available; (b) on lands now
utilized for sanitary fill purposes at Houghton and Quick Roads; (c) perhaps in Sections s ·and 32, at the _west end of MiadLe. Road .

4.

Another recreation resource for Township residents is the 80 acre tract
owned by Friendship Township, one-half mile north of West Traverse
Township. This tract could be jointly owned and operated for recreation
purposes by both communities.

If the Township Hall is ever moved or reconstructed on a larger site, it
could be located on a recreation area to provide community building services as well as a large town hall site.

-46-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

Cities of Petoskey and Harbor Springs - Both of the incorporated Cities have
statistical park land surpluses through 1990.
population .

Both are expected to increase in

As a part of the County Recreation Plan, the separate recreation

plans prepared for these two communities are hereby declared to be a part of
the C o unty Comprehensive Recreation Plan.

The separate Plans are referenced

as follows :

1.

Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., Recreational Facilities, Petoskey
Area Planning Commission, January, 1969.

2.

Williams and Works, Comprehensive Plan, Harbor Springs, Report 1,
1969.

Because of the vast land and resource potentials of Emmet County, it is difficult
to foresee every specific local recreational need that may; evolve in the ye a rs
ahead .

Hence, it is expected that the County Recreation Plan may be amended

from time to time to reflect the optimum needs of the moment.

These may relate ,

to population •g rowth, new town developments, desire to preserve a resource not
now inventoried, and/ or to accept land bequests from philanthropic persons in
the community.

Also, the evalvement of a county park system could reli·e ve

the individual '. townships of some recreation responsibilities, or may supplement
e x isting township parks.

-47-

�C £ C I L

.
-~

8

~G . .

A

r

T.HN.

,.►
~

8
STllHGEON

~

.. y

8

r

r

~
~
~

j

'
t
~

~

-"~~--~
'. I_

'

1

71

~

jf

T 57N.

:

I
I
I
I
I

J□
-J
L_ ~
--~:, ---- -- u- : '~~
U

1

:;

H

It

H

i

-.._..,,

I

h'

.'\~. 01.
ii

lr.

, I

T

~:

I

.

:

.

;if---=--=--=-~3-~::~~,
,
J~p
:;P ,, ll
i! ••,,........

ji

v,l~w;n•

~==~
~

. r .

T

'

'

l--~ -

~ ~ L _JI . ,_---~:~~:

__]

T. 36N

I
1,.,

In

JI

1,

.....::;:~~

~

n1

;D~[ u - - c~~-_- .~
I

\I

I

-"(~.g;
~... ,.

1.. '

·i'

_

.

\I_'._

r=-=,1 ~
__, lJ

-· ..

I [-

~ .. .,,J..L ,,
- ---- : :
-:
- ..::,rr

L=-·
,. _~
,GJ ~nf]-- -------1
,1.~ut
De
,ii~D'l□C______.
.U

4~ -

,~"=-.·

1:

I

-&lt;&gt;- -&lt;&gt;- .....,..,...

• ~I

1

:=1•
~
I

~%,:- -

_J

_: _;-

II

~"'~
'i!i,~.

-

•

.

-

'if~

-

&gt;f'."'-~
w E

:--]

~~LW~
-·
L 1

0-.-,

1

T

1

- - · -·

L

j

, I , ; ·]I ••

.~ I

•

1. lra; . 1JI' - :

~ nnl ,r 1

~~~_::- .

t..,

~~

~

"'

11 dl··--J----~1

t "J

T 30N.

'{

.J

LITTLE

TRAVERSE

8

A Y

... ... 4P:-, ,F',7 '--.-

·

I"

.1

j~
1
s

"

•

II
•

1CT--=dr --

... "'=l

I ,' (\~1'' ' \ ~ :

J-!□
I

!

·

1

~cu=~-

•

\; -

2.__..!l!

.,

1I

,~ ~ ~L

I, _..

LJ-1'~LJ~]l
~s-o
~~~:·__!i j~~-·
_ ... • ·!. , 1n1 ·
.', -~
1:=J.
l- .-1-~--r__..:In
,,_ .-

:
-~
-~
_,-. 2J_l
--~~
-R
di
~l

~"=='===='Jo·-· ~

=;r=

--

- --,~
E

l

A
._J

-,

, • ·

E'

1 '"""

~o-

7

1/

~~ P&gt; •

I

I
~"-----:_.

__. ' a• l'.c=

~
H((

\\

n

....

I

~ ~

~'IL

,,I'/

~

r# I.L~&amp;•
• ,1

Of ..-,. ~

rt

~

""°"
--- ---=----,........._~
,... --•:i•.u-~

"'!.II .........

•4' ~ ·

: J l ~ N C - - - N'll"a~
. ~r-«-..
LIM ~ UUS"......cl ~ ~ • OIUE n
MCTIQll'9l ;:Jl f"!!ill«-IIJ-c.6"Ta.t•S.. U .......~
~ l ' l 'r!C ~ ~.~
CJI~~

-

-•
~

~
++

•
vifico11 ~ lemoa a oasoc.. ii,c..,
p l oa11 i 119
co111allon11

I

RECREA TION

EMMET

M

\\

~

-~
- ~ - - :~J - ~

COUNTY

[ ' "'

PLAN

II

,.

11.

COUNTY
R 4W

HARDWOOD STATE FOREST PROJECT BOUNDARY

(modifl•d tom•what to r•f l•ct land ownu1hlp a u /1t lng usu )
EX IST ING REG IONAL PARK· RECREATI ON AREAS
EX IST ING LOCAL RECREAT ION
l comrnuni ty a ac hoo I
PROPOSED REG IONAL

a

COMM UNITY -WI DE RECREA T ION

(rtur 1tr•am corridor, , lake accH1, a ruou rce protect ion)

POTENT I AL LOCAL-COMM UN I TY RECREAT I ON AREAS
( i ncl udu ol ternatt 1i h1}
POTENTI AL WILDERNESS I MAGE ACCESS TO STATE PARK

+

)\
II \\.

!.,

r
,.

~

r

I

�---,

COUNTY-WIDE RECREATION PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
1.

County Entrance Points
There are four key roadway access points that can
be regarded as County entrances, Entrance points
may feature information centers, attractive landscaping, and/or coordinated sign treatment, as
they give visitors an immediate image of the
County. Harbor areas and airports are also entrance
areas that need beautification attention.

2.

I
~

00
I

SUGGESTED ACTION

Either the County or interested groups within the
County should initiate a program to beautify County
entrances. Similar action should be taken by the
larger communities so that uncontrolled billboarding and unsightly land uses are avoided. Countywide zoning or local zoning ordinances should
support the concepts of attractive entrance points.

Historical Sites
Emmet County has significant historical areas to
interest tourists and enrich the cultural characteristics of the County . Both Catholic and Protestant
missionaries pioneered early County development
through their work with the Indians. Some dominant
historical areas which hold a potential for increased
tourism-recreation development include : ( 1) original
Indian mission sites, and early churches ; (2) Indian
burial grounds and Indian village sites ; (3) lumbering
history; (4) the cottage of the Hemmingway family, and
(5) the passenger pigeon. Former mission communities, historical villages , and lumber towns can be
successful tourist attractions, and would complement
Fort Michilimackinac.

The County should work with religious faiths, local
historical groups, the State Historical Commission
and others, to evolve a strong inter-related historical
recreation complex. It is advantageous that the
strong history of the County relates closely to the
natural attractions of the Lake Michigan shore.
Measures to safe- guard existing nistorical features
should be explored as well as methods for financing
developments . Cross Village has a particularly strong
Indian-missionary history that can be enhanced by
historical development projects. Other points of
interest along the Lake Michigan shore can be worked
into the historical area known as L'Arbre Croche
Country.

�- - 3.

Parks and Public Access Sites
Emmet County, as a unit of government does not own
or maintain any parks. The State, individual townships, and municipalities own and operate existing
facilities for outdoor recreation. Fort Michilimackinac,
Wilderness, and Petoskey State Parks attract most of
the tourist oriented recreation, although ther-e are
other public access sites and campgrounds, .
Each park site and recreation area should have a development plan which respects the carrying capacity of the
land. As the demand approaches the park 1 s carrying
capacity, then the next phase of planned development
should be implemented, and/ or another park area established. The attraction features of each park should
also be multi-faceted, so that there are items which
can interest all age groups. A campground, for example, will function best if it can provide scenic trails,
playground apparatus, historical features and monuments,
and unique natural features (rock strata, wiidlife, pla::i:r.t
life, etc.).

I

.i,.

'°
I

4.

-

The County can appoint a committee(s) to evaluate
the aesthetic and recreational qualities bf _all existing park sites. Recommendations for improvements,
expansions, and broadened services should be
made to the appropr-iate sponsoring agency.
Although Emmet County has a comparatively low
total population, it would be well to investiget:e the
desirability of establishing a County Park system,
perhaps under a County Recreation Authori_tv.
County parks could then be developed in critical _ ,
recreation and resource areas where state, township or village governments may not wish to act or
cannot act. This would broaden the County 1 s resources to develop recreation areas and preserve
scenic attractions.

Game and Fish Management
County support of State fish and game management practices is important to the encouragement of hunters
and fishermen. Land developments and land uses
which infringe upon game longevity should be avoided.
In addition to the problems of stream bank erosion
from improper building and tree cutting, and the
extension o f highways through hab itat areas , snowmobile operators should be restr ic ted from game
areas de eme d vital for gan1e management success.

Game management programs should encompass three
major land owner ships : ( l) the Hardwood State
Forest , (2) other public lands , and (3) private
recreation-forest acreages. Timber, fish and
game management practices are essential elements of ecological balance, a concern which
extends into adjacent counties as well. With the
assistance of the particular agencies respons i ble ,
periodic reports should be available on area
resource management. Moreo v er , the retention
of productive farms should be recogn ize d as an
i mportant element of game management.

�5.

The Wilderness or Northern Image
Emmet County is unique from metropolitan areas, because it is 11 up north'' and has the aura of a great outdoors and wilderness. Although there are more primitive
regions in Michigan, Emmet is readily accessible by
land, water and air from metropolitan areas. Hence,
the image of a woods, waters, open space character
must be maintained in the face of pressures to over
develop.

I
(JI

0
I

6.

Wilderness type areas in Emmet County are in
the WiLderness State Park, Wa Watam Township,
the region between Larks Lake and the ski resorts,
and in the lower half of Springvale Township.
Woods, rolling topography, and swamp areas ensure this image at present.
The state and private forest owners will be most
responsible for determining the extent and use of
wilderness type areas. Tree cutting on hill sides
and along the roads are key areas of concern.
Canoe waters should be given high priority for
scenic easement protection and efforts made to
identify and promote canoeing as a significant
recreational feature of the County. Streams
must also be protected for their value in producing fish and their role in game management.

Topographic Resources
The region including Emmet County is unique for its
rolling-hilly landscape. Of importance is the fact that
there are numerous scenic overlooks and commanding
views of Lake Michigan and wooded country side.
There are broad valleys and wide vistas in many interior county areas.

Scenic views offer exceptional recreation potential
with a high attraction for tourists and visitors
from the flat land regions of most metropolitan
centers in the Midwest. The County should
pursue a long- range program to develop and/ or
promote access to strategic hill tops. Boyne
Highlands and Nubs Nob are examples of economic use of topographic features. Hiking trails
should follow carefully planned routes to offer
variety in terms of occasional views from ridge
lines, land form, game areas, and forest types.
Scenic views from highways should also be protected from urban development. One example
is on US - 131 as it enters Petoskey from the south
(Rotary Park area.)

�7.

Winter SE_orts
Snow and climatic conditions in Emmet County have
proven the potential for a long winter sports season.
Current activities include skiing, snowmobiling, and
skating.

Winter sports activity is heavily oriented to the
major ski resorts of Boyne Highlands and Nubs Nob.
Where feasible, smaller hills in Township or City
areas should be reserved for casual winter play
activity. A good example is Petoskey' s Winter
Sports Park. Sledding, tobogganing and skiing
would be permitted. Too often the topographic
resources become developed for cottage-resort
use, and the community at large has limited
access.
Snowmobile trails should be extended throughout
Emmet County and into adjacent counties to fit
into long cross-country trails. Utility easements
(power lines and natural gas) offer good potential for long distance trails.
Cross country
skiing and snow shoe routes also afford good
active outdoor recreation. Perhaps the Wilderness Golf Course and recreation subdivision in
Ca_!p Lake Township could be diversified into
a snowmobile resort complex.

I

U1
.....
I

8.

Geologic Points of Interest and Minerals
A significant recreation attraction to area visitors are
land forms which differ from the visitors I home area.
Their importance is demonstrated by the efforts of the
N~tional Park Service to acquire and develop the
Pictured Rocks area near Munising. Emmet County
has geologic attractions, most notably the cliffs along
Lake Michigan and the limestone quarries. The
"Petoskey Stone" is a product of geologic time and is commemorated - by an historical marker in Petoskey.
Lake Michigan sand beaches are another highly attractive resource.

Geologic and physiographic interest items should
be catalogued, mapped, described in terms of unusual features, historic importance and accessibility. Efforts should also be made to reserve
and preserve scarce resources , such as the sandy
beaches which extend from the Cross Village
area to Wilderness Park. Some undeveloped
lake front still exists in the area .

�9.

Private Recreation Enter.E_rises
The variety of resources and nearness to metropolitan
areas opens the door for private recreation enterprises
for all seasons. Boat marinas, lake trolling, recreation
farms, dude ranches, guided tours, camping areas,
canoe liveries, vacation homes, and ski resorts hold
varying potentials for individual investment. Moreover,
transportation factors are improving and metropolitan
centers continue to expand, increasing the demand for
outdoor recreation.
Private recreation must be part of the comprehensive
recreation picture and the concept of multiple use encouraged. Abandoned farms, marginal farms, and
productive farms may offer year around recreation services for hunting, camping, hiking trails, vacation farm
activity, snowmobiling and the like. Boating and canoeing are also popular activities.

I

u,
N
I

10.

Research and Education
The University of Michigan operates a forest research
facility near Pellston that encompasses several square
miles of land. Within the research area are two important streams -- Van Creek and the east' branch of
the Maple River.

Private outdoor recreation is needed if the area is
to reap economic benefits from the field of tourismrecreation. Public parks and access sites represent
only part of the required services. To the extent
feasible, individual (e.g. groups or persons) developments should work into the total County
theme for recreation and must form at least one
segment in a complex of recreation opportunity.
For example, golf course locations should consider their role in the establishment of vacation
home sites, retirement villages, resort developments and related. Therefore, public
parks, historic attractions, and private tourist
attractions must recognize the importance of their
facility in terms of its total attraction potential.
Will the facility be attractive and of quality, is
it self- supporting, can it also promote the use
of other facilities, does it contribute to wild
life management and resource conservation?
Answering these basic questions will decide
whether or not a recreational facility is part of
a comprehensive recreation system.
On- site tours would prove to be an educational
experience for tourists who may have little prior
knowledge of forest management practices and
ne-w methods being employed. A complete educational complex may include an operating sawmill, examples of timber grades, and related
aspects of the timber industry. Private wood
using industries in the County could add to the
forest industry tour to demonstrate the facinating
aspects of this industry. The recreation of a logging town (perhaps Pellston) can also promote
some of these objectives.

�11.

Trails
The physiography of Emmet County is highly adaptive to
the development of scenic trails as these are necessary
to complete the access sytitem to the area's recreation
attractions. Depending on the particular site and season,
wooded trails may be designated for hiking, snowshoeing, bicycling, horseback riding, cross- country
skiing, snowbwbiling, motorcycling, and jeep tours.
One trail cannot practically satisfy all modes of transportation, but trails should be designated for most types.

12.
I
(JI
I.,.)

Cooperating groups and agencies concerned with
Emmet County and its environs, should act to develop
a diverse trail system . With renewed interest in
bicycling, it may be unique to develop a bicycle
path through part of a timber stand . The same trail
could be used in winter for snow-·shoeing or crosscountry skiing. Equestrian pack trains into the
Wilderness Park area could be an attractive ~_tourist
experience. Of interest would be historic explorer
routes, Indian trails and the cross-country routes
-of early missionaries. Several of these must exist
between Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Mackinaw
City. (L'Arbre Croche County)

Lakes, Ponds and Rivers
Water oriented recreation is a major area attraction for
tourists, summer home residents and sportsmen. As
a rule there is less water access in resort areas than
there are tourists. Over use and over development is
therefore a problem.

Protecting the water resources of Emmet County
will be a major implementation objective, and
involves the State,. County, , and private land developers . The public concern should be to encourage
better development practices so that pollution does
not occur, and water recreation opportunities are
not limited to the privileged few. The concept
of.cluster developments is one means to achieve
both pollution control and resource preservation.
Public ownership or community control of shorelines, river banks, and scarce sandy beach areas
is the best preservation measures provided an
allowance is made for private development needs.
At the present time, there are undeveloped beach
areas, river valleys, lakes, and ponds that should
be preserved for broader public enjoyment and
not subdivided into small lots.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008126">
                <text>Emmet-County_Comprehensive-Recreation-Plan_1970</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008127">
                <text>Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008128">
                <text>1970-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008129">
                <text>Comprehensive Recreation Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008130">
                <text>The Comprehensive Recreation Plan for Emmet County was prepared by Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc. in March 1970.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008131">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008132">
                <text>Recreation--Planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008133">
                <text>Emmet County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008134">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008136">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008137">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008138">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008139">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038314">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="26715" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="28831">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ecf4240c74208b2a8eb14f2a3e2bae73.jpg</src>
        <authentication>ae7922cc0c4021700047ebff62eb0fb6</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464843">
                  <text>Decorated Publishers' Bindings</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464844">
                  <text>Book covers</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464845">
                  <text>Covers (Illustration)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464846">
                  <text>Graphic arts</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464847">
                  <text>Publishers and publishing</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464848">
                  <text>Pictorial bindings</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464849">
                  <text>From the early 1870s to roughly 1930, many publishers issued their commercial book covers with a remarkable variety of graphic designs and illustrations. This sixty-year period saw many artists and designers contributing to this art form. While some can be identified from their style or initials, others remain unknown.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464850">
                  <text>Seidman Rare Books Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465152">
                  <text>Michigan Novels Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465153">
                  <text>Regional Historical Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465154">
                  <text>Lincoln and the Civil War Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464851">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464852">
                  <text>2017-08-30</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464853">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464854">
                  <text>image/jpg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464855">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464856">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464857">
                  <text>DC-01</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="62">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description/>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="495307">
              <text>Seidman Rare Books. PR6011.O74 C66 1898 </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495292">
                <text>DC-01_Bindings0390</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495293">
                <text>Concerning Isabel Carnaby</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495294">
                <text>Binding of Concerning Isabel Carnaby, by Ellen Thorneycroft Fowler, D. Appleton and Company, 1898.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495296">
                <text>Book covers</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="495297">
                <text>Covers (Illustration)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="495298">
                <text>Graphic arts</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="495299">
                <text>Publishers and publishing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="495300">
                <text>Pictorial bindings</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495301">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495302">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495303">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495304">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495306">
                <text>1898</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030620">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="55253" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59524">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d15552d75b037a42d30b662b3068ce70.jpg</src>
        <authentication>a77744bc01414ae747344994f7a22ed5</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016884">
                <text>RHC-183_K185-0026</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016885">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016886">
                <text>1970-08-05/1970-08-07</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016887">
                <text>Concert at the Kane County Fair, Illinois</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016888">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a music concert at the Kane County Fair in Kane County, Illinois. In the photograph, a group of young men are playing guitars and performing onstage, while a crowd of young women are watching the show from the side of the stage. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016889">
                <text>Kane County (Ill.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016890">
                <text>Concerts--Illinois</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016891">
                <text>Fairs--Illinois</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016892">
                <text>Black-and-white photography</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016893">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016895">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016896">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016897">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1016898">
                <text>1970s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038727">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3617" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4219">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9b971c59e65ef104fbdc677620564a2a.jpg</src>
        <authentication>d3f2d3fa7b9822f4215a3eb2c0d5d9cc</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="4">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48651">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48652">
                  <text>Aerial photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765576">
                  <text>Universities and colleges</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765577">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765578">
                  <text>Grand Rapids (Mich.)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765579">
                  <text>Allendale (Mich.)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765580">
                  <text>Building</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765581">
                  <text>Facilities</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765582">
                  <text>Dormitories</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765583">
                  <text>Students</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765584">
                  <text>Events</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765585">
                  <text>1960s</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765586">
                  <text>1970s</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765587">
                  <text>1980s</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765588">
                  <text>1990s</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765589">
                  <text>2000s</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48653">
                  <text>People, places, and events of Grand Valley State University from its founding in 1960 as a 4-year college in western Michigan.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48654">
                  <text>News &amp; Information Services. University Communications&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48655">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/41"&gt;News &amp;amp; Information Services. University Photographs. (GV012-01)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48656">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48657">
                  <text>2017-03-03</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48658">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-NC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48659">
                  <text>image/jpg&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48660">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48661">
                  <text>image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48662">
                  <text>GV012-01&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="48663">
                  <text>1960s-2000s&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="58">
          <name>Local Subject</name>
          <description>Subject headings specific to a particular image collection</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="59353">
              <text>1970s</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="62">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description/>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="570929">
              <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/41"&gt;University photographs, GV012-01&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="59343">
                <text>GV012-01_UAPhotos_000814</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="59344">
                <text>Concert at Zumberge Pond</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="59345">
                <text>Concert at Zumberge Pond.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="59347">
                <text>Grand Valley State University</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="59348">
                <text>Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="59349">
                <text>Allendale (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="59350">
                <text>Universities and colleges</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="59351">
                <text>Students</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="59352">
                <text>Events</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="59354">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="59355">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-NC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="59356">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="59357">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1025091">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="532">
        <name>black and white photo</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="55727" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59911">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9c08e39b07d97cfdb44e8773e868955b.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f415b4e3065226ac775adf4a4e4bcdae</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024169">
                <text>RHC-183_Z034-0008a</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024170">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024171">
                <text>1985-09-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024172">
                <text>Concession Stand, Salisbury Beach</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024173">
                <text>Black and white photograph of concession stand located at Salisbury Beach’s Amusement Center in Salisbury, Massachusetts. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024174">
                <text>Concessions (Amusements, etc.)--Massachusetts--Salisbury</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024175">
                <text>Salisbury (Mass.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024176">
                <text>Salisbury (Mass. : Town)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024177">
                <text>Black-and-white photography</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024178">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024180">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024181">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024182">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1024183">
                <text>1980s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1039085">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="40110" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="43898">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7949cc3620cffcb38627f3c947c1260d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>374d59c004c0b7706f581aec8fbca658</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="763551">
                    <text>�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="36">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="761921">
                  <text>Incunabula</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765550">
                  <text>The term incunabula refers to books printed between 1450 and 1500, approximately the first fifty years following the invention, by Johann Gutenberg of Mainz, of printing from moveable type. Our collection includes over 200 volumes and numerous unbound leaves from books printed during this period.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765551">
                  <text>1450/1500</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765552">
                  <text>Incunabula Collection (DC-03)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765553">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United &lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765554">
                  <text>Incunabula</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765747">
                  <text>Printing 1450-1500</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765555">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765556">
                  <text>DC-03</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765557">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765558">
                  <text>text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765559">
                  <text>eng&#13;
it&#13;
la&#13;
nl &#13;
de</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763538">
                <text>Concordantiae bibliorum [folium 93]</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763539">
                <text>DC-03_093Conradus1496</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763540">
                <text>Conradus de Alemania</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763541">
                <text>One leaf from Concordantiae bibliorum by Conradus de Alemania and edited by Sebastian Brant. Printed in Basel by Johann Froben and Johann Petri de Langendorff in 1496. [GW 7422; ISTC ic00853000]</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763542">
                <text>Basel: Johann Froben and Johann Petri de Langendorff</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763543">
                <text>Incunabula</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="763544">
                <text>Printing 1450-1500</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763545">
                <text>la</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763546">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763548">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763549">
                <text>1496</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="763550">
                <text>Seidman Rare Books Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="792785">
                <text>Brant, Sebastian (editor)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="799290">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="52946" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="57400">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a2c9ab7a678fafdeeef23433ae88b86e.jpg</src>
        <authentication>1bc09300ef0264ee926e7d1ebd4823f2</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980747">
                <text>RHC-183_A009-0977</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980748">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980749">
                <text>1960-04-15</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980750">
                <text>Concrete fencing in courtyard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980751">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a close-up view of decorative conrete fencing located outside a church building in Allen Park, Michigan on April 15, 1960. Photograph by Douglas R. Gilbert. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980752">
                <text>Allen Park (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="980753">
                <text>Black-and-white photography</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980754">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980756">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980757">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980758">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="980759">
                <text>1960s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1037120">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="26633" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="28749">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/30fc70359338ca91214ec0f1e76a4a94.jpg</src>
        <authentication>5a0835ae9c973ce75ed3dc5026590d4d</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464843">
                  <text>Decorated Publishers' Bindings</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464844">
                  <text>Book covers</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464845">
                  <text>Covers (Illustration)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464846">
                  <text>Graphic arts</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464847">
                  <text>Publishers and publishing</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="464848">
                  <text>Pictorial bindings</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464849">
                  <text>From the early 1870s to roughly 1930, many publishers issued their commercial book covers with a remarkable variety of graphic designs and illustrations. This sixty-year period saw many artists and designers contributing to this art form. While some can be identified from their style or initials, others remain unknown.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464850">
                  <text>Seidman Rare Books Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465152">
                  <text>Michigan Novels Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465153">
                  <text>Regional Historical Collection</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="465154">
                  <text>Lincoln and the Civil War Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464851">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464852">
                  <text>2017-08-30</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464853">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464854">
                  <text>image/jpg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464855">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464856">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="464857">
                  <text>DC-01</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="62">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description/>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="493972">
              <text>Seidman Rare Books. PS1829 .C635 1902 </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493956">
                <text>DC-01_Bindings0308</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493957">
                <text>Condensed Novels: Second Series,  New Burlesques</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493959">
                <text>Bindings of Condensed Novels: Second Series, New Burlesques, by Bret Harte, published by Houghton, Mifflin and Co., 1902.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493961">
                <text>Book covers</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="493962">
                <text>Covers (Illustration)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="493963">
                <text>Graphic arts</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="493964">
                <text>Publishers and publishing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="493965">
                <text>Pictorial bindings</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493966">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493967">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493968">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493969">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="493971">
                <text>1902</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030538">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="28729" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31228">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/5f70e5ba0299958b87e412160a990da5.mp4</src>
        <authentication>646853e86050cce62d9ee6ee97e85744</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="50553">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/0afc7e6097d420f01f4f6b907939974e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>643d67dae59c24a05222ff18f28f981c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="865914">
                    <text>ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEW
VICKI CONDON SHARROCK
Born: Lowell, Michigan
Resides: Lowell, Michigan
Interviewed by: Kyle Riley, GVSU Veterans History Project
Transcribed by: Claire Herhold, January 25, 2013
Interviewer: Mrs. Condon, can you tell us a little bit about yourself and what you’re doing
today?
Well, right now I am a production assistant for LandAmerica Transnation where I, realtors,
mortgage companies call in and ask for policies, ask for title work, or as for the last deed on the
property. Then I check the records that we have and get a copy of their deed, show that any
mortgages are on there, and pretty much answer questions, help with policies, very detailed.
Interviewer: So, when you were a little girl, what was your life like?
I grew up on a small farm. 1:01 We produced food for ourselves. My father worked in the
factory, came home, did the milking. We raised pigs, we had sheep, a huge garden. My mother
canned a lot. I helped gather eggs. I helped bring the cows up for milking and later on I milked
and fed the animals and went to school. And I went to a little country school just a half mile
away for a couple of years, a one room school.
Interviewer: What kind of things did you do? Were you a large part in the role of the farm
family?
Well, there were four of us girls, and I was pretty much the tomboy. My older sister stayed in
the house, and my two younger sisters were too young to do a whole lot on the farm, but I
helped. My sister would drive the tractor during haying season and I would, in the back, because
we didn’t bale initially, we just put the loose hay and then we got to pack it down in the barn
which was the best, you know, every kid on a farm loves to jump down on the hay from up

�above. 2:10 First time out, you’re scared to death but you make that first jump and it’s kind of
fun.
Interviewer: Did you have any struggles with your family, or did your family share any
struggles of the day?
We just, my parents worked hard to get any place, and we lived paycheck to paycheck. We
didn’t have a lot, but we had plenty of food. We had fresh milk. We had homemade butter,
homemade bread, and all the canned foods in the wintertime, so we were rich. We had no
money but we were rich.
Interviewer: What was the hardest thing about your childhood growing up?
Being so far away from town. My father worked and it was like two and a half miles to town, so
unless we walked then we couldn’t. 3:08 There was a lot of things at school that we couldn’t
participate in because we didn’t have the gas or the time or the money to drive into town.
Interviewer: What did you like to do during high school and when you were older and
started to get new jobs and start exploring more opportunities?
Between my junior and senior year, I worked at Amway. And I worked at Amway until I joined
the Navy. That was a summer job for me and it was…I worked at A&amp;W root beer outside of
town, and I was really excited because I made ten cents an hour. No, the root beer was ten cents,
I think I made seventy cents, and the second year I worked I made seventy five centers, and the
third year that I worked there I made ninety cents but I worked in the kitchen where it was hot.
4:10 It was more fun outside with the customers.
Interviewer: What made you decide to go into the Navy?
I liked the idea of the military. I didn’t want to work in a factory like my parents did. It was a
struggle for them to make ends meet with four of us girls. I wanted something more in life. I

�wanted to go to college. We couldn’t afford college. I was able to go on the Vietnam GI Bill
because I went in during Vietnam and served my three years active duty during that time. But I
didn’t want to, I wanted to get away from a small town atmosphere and I did, but I came back
because I love Lowell. I mean, it’s a great little town. 5:01 It’s improved a lot, culturally,
socially and I like the small town atmosphere as an adult. As a kid, nobody likes it, you know,
that’s just a fact of life.
Interviewer: Before you went into the military, did you have any dreams of becoming a
certain profession at all?
Oh yeah. I had taken three years of French in high school, and I wanted to be a United Nations
interpreter. That was my goal in high school.
Interviewer: Did you think that joining the military could help you achieve that dream at
all?
No, because by that time I had already been married and divorced. There were other things. I
wanted my college degree. I wanted to teach.
Interviewer: What kind of things did you do after you went into the Navy?
As far as employment, or…?
Interviewer: When you joined up, what was the first thing that you did? 6:03
I jumped off a bunk bed and hit the floor on my face because we had gotten, we flew in, our first
day of boot camp, we flew into Bainbridge, Maryland and we got in there late, and there’s an
open bed here and an open bed there, an open bed there, and they put us all, you know, “go to
bed and we’ll get you squared away tomorrow.” And I woke up at 5:00 when the bells were
ringing, young women were running all over the place trying to get squared away, and they said,
“well, you have to hurry up and get out of bed because we’ve got to get going.” So I jumped out

�of the bunk bed but I was on the top row and fell right on my face. That was my first experience
of boot camp. Get up and get going.
Interviewer: What was that like for you?
I was a scared little girl. I was a little country girl. I was very intimidated. Anybody that was in
uniform that wasn’t one of my peers, I was scared to death. 7:03 I later learned to differentiate
between officer and non-commissioned officer but, you now, that first couple of weeks it was a
… I was very timid and had to learn to obey orders then, not think about it. Discipline was very
strong, but we were ladies, we had to become ladies and we were also to become square corners.
You will be a square corner. We had to learn to do those bunk beds. You know that was our
CC, our Company Commander’s motto. You will be a lady and you will be a square corner. So,
I can still make a square corner.
Interviewer: What kind of things did you learn at boot camp?
Boot camp…I was at Bainbridge, Maryland, which, we were the next to the last company of
women to go through. We did a lot of marching. 8:02 We learned the history classes of the
Navy, and ships and planes and the whole criteria of the military rule. But we didn’t work with
any ammunition, any guns. We were ladies, and it wasn’t until the boot camp closed down in
Maryland and they went down to Orlando, Florida where the women would use guns and learn
how to shoot firearms and break them down, clean them and put them back together again. But
the training we had at Naval Pen TC Bainbridge was, we were ladies. Things changed. Things
changed, and are still changing. At the time I was on active duty women were not allowed to
have dependents. Women were not allowed to be on ships. It was later, as I had gotten out of
the Navy, that women were first going to the hospital ships, refrigerator tankers, that type where

�they were supply type ships that would go out to the fleet. 9:15 And now women are on all the
ships and are in combat, but in the ‘70s when I was on active duty, that was not a choice.
Interviewer: Did you have any idea on what you were going to do after you joined the
military, after boot camp?
Well, they had all the testing. You test before you go into the military, number one, to make sure
that you’re smart enough. You know, the army has basic training tests. And then there was
another battery tests, and we were always taking tests. And then they had them geared toward
your field of operation. 10:07 What best suited you? And for me, it was a clerical type position
which was the radioman, and we learned how to use the older equipment. Now, everything’s
done on computers but back then we had ship-to-shore, ship-to-ship, voice communications and
now we have satellites.
Interviewer: Were you excited at all to go into your new job?
Yeah, I worked a regular shift. I worked forty hours, or thirty six hours, depending on my
schedule. We worked three shifts in one week and it rotated, so if I went on Monday I got off
Friday morning and I didn’t go back again until Tuesday. And then Tuesday I’d work until
Saturday, and Wednesday through Sunday, so it was always variable. 11:04 But basically I went
in, we logged in our messages, and I worked for the Naval Investigative Service, under Naval
Intelligence Command. And we had all of our agents who, our messages would come in. The
subject matter would determine what branch, what office it went to. We logged them in, put
them in a folder and delivered them to the lieutenants, officers or agents, or whoever was in
charge for that department, and we had our security clearances. There were things that came in
that we rushed right down to the captain’s office and turned around and left, because once we
handed it off we didn’t want to know what else was happening.

�Interviewer: Were you involved in any large operations or missions?
The final thing that I was involved with was Operation Homecoming. When the Vietnam War
officially ended to the public we were involved in bringing the men and women back to the
United States. 12:10 So we had all the messages of who was coming from where, and who was
MIA, missing in action, and who ended up being a POW, prisoner of war. We received a letter
of commendation for that. We didn’t get a unit citation which would have been another medal,
but we did get the letter, which helped for advancement later on down the road.
Interviewer: Was your job very stressful? Were you really nervous about going into your
job every day?
The thing that…I wasn’t nervous, but I know that some of the stuff came in that I couldn’t write
home to Mom and Dad about because there were things happening around the world. 13:01 I
went back to the same office as a civilian worker when I got out of the Navy and was there
during the Iran crisis. That was when Reagan was ending his presidency…oh, I can’t even
remember the entire situation. I know that things happened fast. That’s pretty much it.
Interviewer: What kind of things did you earn while you were on active duty?
As far as ribbons and awards?
Interviewer: Yes.
Ok. Right out of boot camp, because I was in during the Vietnam Era what we all considered the
Geedunk Medal which is this one right here. 14:05 You got it just because you were in the
military at that time. And then I was also in the reserves during the Iraq confrontation so I have
my Bronze Star. This ribbon right here is Four Years of Reserve, Meritorious, and I had
seventeen reserves so I’ve got one plus three stars so that counts for sixteen years. This is ten
years for the Navy Reserve, and this one right here is for, I believe that’s my Navy Achievement

�award. And then I also have a ribbon that I got when I was in Washington D.C. for the
dedication ceremony for the Women’s Military Memorial.
Interviewer: What kind of conflicts would you face normally at your job? 15:08
Getting a paper cut. Conflict, I mean, there are things that I couldn’t talk about, but as far as…I
was in an office building on the tenth floor. We were in Alexandria, Virginia most of the time,
so I wasn’t in any place where I could get harmed. I mean, I was in a safe office building and I
went to work. I had to sometimes go over to the Pentagon. We took the subway. That was scary
sometimes, taking the subway. You would get nervous if a top secret message came in because
you had a certain length of time that you had to get it processed and get it down to the person
that it was addressed to. 16:01 So that, you’d get a little nervous and stuff, but other than that it
was lots of paperwork.
Interviewer: How would you process the messages you sent and received?
We had a big, and I couldn’t even tell you, it was a paper tape reader basically. We had rolls of
yellow tape that had holes in them, and each line of holes represented a letter and we typed our
messages and…we typed our messages on a special machine that printed out the holes for the
tape, and we would have big rolls of paper tape that we would use and send out the messages,
and then we’d wind it up and hang it on a hook until we knew that they had processed. But our
messages were read into a system and then they went to another central service where they was
disseminated around the world basically. 17:05 And then messages would come back in from
around the world through the central system and come into our office, and it was all set up. But
now everything is done on computers, you know. You put who it’s to, and you carbon copy too.
Just type everything out on computers now.
Interviewer: How did your military life affect your family life and personal life?

�When I first went in, I was a little country girl and I seen the world. I have a very open mind. I
feel I’m a whole lot smarter, and I didn’t end up working in a factory my whole life. I’ve done
other things. I’ve gone to college and I have a two year degree in business management from
Fairfax, Virginia and then I have a Bachelor’s degree in education at Aquinas. 18:08 And
through the military, the GI Bill, I was able to go to the two year college, and I was able to quit
work because I had five stepchildren during that marriage, and the more children you had during
the Vietnam era, the more money you got on the GI Bill, so it worked in my favor under those,
you know…so I went and did my two year degree.
Interviewer: Were there very many things that were different because you were a female in
the military?
The only thing that…we went to boot camp, I was surrounded by women. We were not allowed
to skylark, which is, you know, looking at guys on the other side of the fence, you know, because
we were in a closed area. And we were ladies, we were not, you know…some of us had been
married, and we were twelve weeks with over three hundred girls. 19:11 And working with
women is sometimes, not always pleasant. It wasn’t bad. And then…I did not stay in a dorm
area when I was in college. I was working full time and going to school part time. So I never
had that dorm, where you’ve got like four or five girls to a room. Well, we had like four or five
girls to a room, but we only had three sides on that room and across the hallway was another
room with four or five girls and there was absolutely no privacy. Then later when I got to my
first active duty station, the only comment made was because I was filling a billet that a man
could have had to be on shore and he could have been home with his family instead of out to sea.
20:13 Because being in the Navy, the men spent an enormous amount of time out to sea. It’s
like, “I’m sorry. I have no control over that,” because women were not allowed on ships, not

�until the end of my active duty were women first starting to go out to sea on the, what we called,
comfort ships.
Interviewer: I just forgot what I was going to ask.
Ok.
Interviewer: Did you get any chance to socialize with the men you were working with?
Oh yeah. It was just like working in an office. I mean, if we were working in the office and
Friday night, I called date night because my husband and I always tried to go out together on
Friday nights, but a lot of the men had families. 21:10 Later in the reserves, I was in the same
reserve unit with the same guys for almost, well, fifteen of seventeen years. I watched them have
their children, raise their families, their children were growing up, and all the sudden getting
ready to graduate. So yeah, we bonded. There was a lot of camaraderie, of you know… a lot of
the times, I’d see their wives at the airport as they were dropping their husbands and saying
goodbye to them as we came in, or if we had functions a couple of times a year, we’d get
together. And I just hope that I didn’t pose any threat to any wife, because they were like
brothers to me. I mean, we were a tight knit group. We went around the world to different
reserve stations, to different communication stations in the reserves, and seen a lot. 22:07 And
they went off and did their thing, and I went off and did my thing, and then came back and
compared notes of what we had seen and what we had done and had a good time. We worked
our forty hours, or our thirty six hours, or had our weekends off so we’d go off on the weekends.
When we were out to California we’d drive up to Reno or Las Vegas or whichever one was
closest to us, and when we went overseas we got to see a lot, a lot more.
Interviewer: What kind of things did you do after you were done with your three years of
active duty?

�I had when I got out, I got out of the Navy after my three years because I had gotten married, I
had five stepchildren, and women were not allowed to have dependents. 23:06 My girlfriend
was, we met in boot camp and gone to radiomen A-school and were good friends for another
fifteen years until I lost contact with her but, you could not have, women could not have
dependents. I had gotten married, I had five stepchildren, I had to get out. She stayed in, got
married, and had a baby. She requested to stay in, and her husband got orders out to California.
She went out there for a little while, had the baby, and when the baby was just still a toddler, she
had to take orders and go to Greenland for a year. She came back, nine months later she had her
second baby, and she said that’s it, no, and she got out of the Navy. She later went into the
reserves, but that was a choice that she made, requesting to stay in, but she was separated from
her brand new baby and her husband for a year. 24:05 And then later, they both went to Italy,
and they were stationed in Italy for three years. She had to sacrifice the twelve months while her
baby was with her husband, and then she was able to join him. Because I had five stepchildren, I
had no choice. I had, we had… I had had orders to go to Guam in 1974. We were the first
shipment of women to go there. But because I was married and had five stepchildren, I had to
get out. I had no choice. So they got me out within the end of the three years. They rushed
through all the paperwork because they knew that if they had kept me in, they would have had to
prorate the enlistment bonus, and that was even more paperwork so they got me out. 25:01 And
then I went back in the government service as a clerk in the same office so I worked with the
same people that I worked with when I was in the Navy which was kind of special because I
knew what I was doing. And then later on I worked that office under Naval Investigative
Service, was involved with the Privacy Act that came out in the early ‘70s, Freedom of
Information Act, so we were very big on getting involved with that.

�Interviewer: While you were in the reserves, what was life like? Was it different from
when you were in active service?
The reserves was a great way to go. I had thought seriously about going back in, but I had a
decent…I was working in computers at that time making good money, and I had one weekend a
months that I had to go to the reserves, and then a two week mini vacation. 26:06 And we
planned that vacation…that two week reserve active duty that we had to do like in January,
February, March time frame so we got out of the weather here in Michigan, and we went to the
east coast, the west coast. We ended up over in Diego Garcia, a little tiny dot of an island in the
middle of the Indian Ocean, and we were there for…our unit was attached to that island, so if the
balloon had gone up, we would have gone there while the active duty had gone to where the
action was. That’s what our reserve unit was to do. And we went to Diego Garcia two years,
two different times in two years. The first time we went to the west coast. We flew to San
Francisco, then to Japan, flew over Vietnam and landed in the Philippines at Clark Air Base and
was there, our plane had to, we were there for a day and a half. 27:15 And then from the
Philippines we flew to Diego Garcia and that was a thirty six hour flight, a long time in the air.
And then four years later, Clark Air Base was no longer in existence and we went the east coast,
and we left from Pennsylvania. We were in Athens, Greece, Naples, Italy, Baharan, and then we
flew to Diego Garcia. But when we were in Baharan, to replenish the plane we had to get off,
but because we were all Americans or British they put us on a bus, drove us out to the middle of
the runway and we had to sit out there for four hours while they took care of the plane, and it was
like a scary thing because all the graffiti on the bus was all in Arabic and our driver had a turban
and we had no idea what was happening. 28:13 All we knew was that we had to go out there and
sit in the middle of the runway until they were done with the plane because they didn’t want the

�natives to know that there were Americans or British on their soil, so… and that was during
the…the United States was escorting the oil tankers during that time so that was the…
Afterwards, when we found out, it was like “Holy cow.” That was exciting, scary. I didn’t feel I
was in any danger, but it was different.
Interviewer: Do you think that, while you were on your job, did you think that you had a really
important job? 29:01
I did, especially…when you went into the reserves, there was always a joke that the reserves
were there to play. Well, we worked our twelve hours a day if we went on to the shift. And we
worked with equipment that maybe we hadn’t worked with before, and the first time I worked in
a fleet alley that was really intimidating for me. We were working sending out voice messages
to the ships, and they all knew that my turn was next and I had to call out to the ships and notify
them that we were sending them traffic, and I was just stuttering so bad and I couldn’t talk and
they were all giggling behind me because they knew that I was…well, the term now would be a
newbie, but that term wasn’t around back then. I just…later, I was ok with it, but the first time
you talk and broadcast out is like being a radio announcer. 30:05 You’re talking to, you know,
how many people are you talking to at one time? How many people are listening to you? And
you’re stuttering and trying to get out important information and that was scary. But now I’ve
got the knowledge, because if the balloon drops now, the first thing that’s going to go are our
satellites and there are not a lot of people who still know how to operate the big receivers and
transmitters, with the exception of the ham operators that are still active today. The ham
operators still are a very important part of our culture.
Interviewer: What kind of things did you do for fun during your job? Did you ever goof
around and maybe misbehave a little bit?

�Heaven forbid. I was sweet and innocent. Yeah, there was…in boot camp, we were a bunch of
women all together and, you know, one big area and one of the girls was a beautician and she
had some wigs with her, and another girl, for some reason, she had a rubber blow up doll. 31:20
And we blew that doll up and I was part of the party that got in trouble, there was about six of us
that did it, and we put that blow up doll and her wig in a bunk and we got caught, and we lost the
smoking privileges. The smoking light was out for a week for us, and back in the ‘70s I smoked,
and I couldn’t smoke for a week because our rubber dolly got caught. It was harmless fun,
but…and the company commander laughed about it later. She couldn’t laugh in front of us, but
that was a very harmless prank. 32:02 But we were there in boot camp over New Years Eve and
the only alcohol we had was mouthwash and all we could say was that we got a little buzz. Well,
yeach. Mouthwash now… but yeah, you joked around. It’s just like being in a regular office.
You’ve got your buds that you work with and joke around with, and hey, how are you doing?
How’s your kids? How’s your wife? That type of thing, so it’s, to me it was like working in a
regular office. Now, later in the reserves, as I got older than the young kids in the Navy, it’s like,
was I ever that young? Was I ever that crazy? It’s like, yeah, I probably was but I’ve grown up
and matured some. Because I retired from the reserves with a total of twenty years in 1998, and
that was the same time that I graduated from Aquinas. 33:01 So I did a double decker and made
a major accomplishment in my life.
Interviewer: The people who were in charge of you, were they mean? Were they the
stereotypical officer who’s always grumpy and always yells at everybody?
The first couple of weeks of boot camp, yeah, that’s what I thought. “You will become a lady.
You will become a square corner.” That was her motto and I was such a little country girl, I was

�terribly intimidated. Now, it’s like, “Excuse me?” That wouldn’t faze me at all now. I’ve raised
children and had a couple of husbands and nothing fazes me now.
Interviewer: If you were ever bored while working, did you ever use the radios to contact
anyone other than who you were supposed to?
No, they were always set up to the frequencies and now, right now, the TVs are all on a certain
frequency where the analog signal… 34:14 There’s certain frequencies that the Navy would use
and you couldn’t contact other people unless they had the same equipment. I know my
girlfriend, when she was in Greenland, she was able to keep in contact with her husband and the
baby, but they were both on military bases where they both had the same type of equipment
where she could do that. But, you know, I couldn’t contact civilians. I just used the phone and
called home when I got homesick.
Interviewer: Did you ever use your military experiences and the things you did as your
military job, did you ever use those in your civilian jobs?
Not really. 35:01 I mean, a lot of the clerical stuff that I did…[break as the phone rings and the
interviewer repeats the question] Most of my job was clerical, logging and stuff, keeping track of
messages coming in, going out, sending out messages, typing. Typing probably…of course, the
typewriter that they had, that they used in the military, number one, were of World War II
vintage, and number two, you had to use special keys for letters and numbers, so you could not
type like you could on a typewriter. Now, that typing skill there followed me on to my civilian
career because I do a lot of typing, but everything’s on a computer, and if you make a mistake
you just hit that little backspace and continue on. 36:07
Interviewer: What kind of things did you do in your civilian life?

�In my civilian life I, through the Vietnam GI Bill, I went to a computer learning center. I was a
programmer. I worked for a company in Virginia and my company transferred me out to
California, and I did programming for military type programs. When I moved back home to
Michigan, my company lost the contract, and so I had a choice to take a job in Hawaii or move
back home. And I had been to Hawaii on my thirtieth birthday and I said, that’s a nice place to
be but I don’t want to live there. So I moved back home, but I was overqualified for all the
programming jobs in this area. I did get a job for a couple of years, but I sat in front of a
computer screen. 37:07 I needed people contact. That was the one thing that I have a lot more of
in my job. I work with the public. I work with realtors. I work with mortgage companies. I work
with buyers and sellers buying their first home, or selling their home that they’ve lived in their
whole life and now they’re going to maybe a condo or a retirement community and you see the
highs and lows of people selling their homes or buying their first home because they’re about to
start a family. So that part there, with my job that I have right now, with the people contact is
what I love the most. And because I was able to be around the world and see different cultures,
when our trip to Diego Garcia, we stopped in the Philippines and we were there for a day and a
half the first time and when we left we were there for three days so I got to see a lot. 38:07 And
we took a drive down, what they call the Bataan Death Road? Death march? This is a time, a
place during World War II, but the thing that stuck in my mind were all these little huts, they had
the clothes out on the line and being held with bamboo clothes pins, but they all had their TV
antennas on the roof. And it was like, wow, they’ve got to have their TV. Their clothes are nice
out on the line but they’re living in little huts, you know, bamboo huts with thatched roofs. And
then later I’ve seen a whole lot more, and it’s like, yeah, I’m very lucky to be in America. We,
when we were in the Philippines, when they told us, you know, that we were going out and stuff

�we had to be careful, what they have was like rent-a-fuzz that were in front of the different
places downtown in Manila, they carried machine guns. 39:15 So you didn’t mess with them.
You stayed away from them. And I went down there with, I never went to... We went in groups,
never alone, always in big groups, four, five, six at a time, and we stayed together and we seen
the sights. But that was when Imelda Marcos was there with all of her shoes and that was the big
joke because I wore high heels and I had ninety pair of high heels and they always called me
Esmeralda Marcos because she was the first lady of the Philippines, her husband. 40:04 And that
was, the Philippines was very eye opening. And of course thirty or forty years before our
soldiers were fighting there and it’s like very, I don’t know, I don’t know how to describe it. But
if you stop and think about stuff like that that you were walking where men had lost their lives
forty years before, you’re going to take things a little bit more seriously.
Interviewer: So you said you’ve traveled a whole lot and you’ve seen the world, but did
that require you actually packing up and moving? Did you ever live in very many places?
No, basically I was living in Virginia when I was in the military, got out, stayed in Virginia and
then I worked for a civilian company and they shipped me out to California, and then I was out
to California for nine months, and then the company lost the contract and I moved back home.
41:13 But I’ve traveled for vacations in a lot of different places and with the two different trips
to Diego Garcia, one we went around the world this way, went around the world this way, so I
can say that yes, I have been around the world. I mean, we stopped in Naples, we stopped in
Athens, and Baharan which I’ve mentioned earlier, so that… Of course, I’ve been to Ireland and
I’ve kissed the Blarney stone but that was on my own time.
Interviewer: So when you were traveling, was it ever hard for your family or for you, being
apart from your family so often? 42:01

�When I was on active duty, I was single and I was stationed in Virginia. Later, when I joined the
reserves, couple of times when I was out in California, my husband at that time went with me.
We stayed on the beach, we didn’t stay in the barracks, we stayed at a hotel which they consider,
what they call, on the beach. So we’d go off and do our sight-seeing when I wasn’t working. He
watched TV or take his crossword puzzles or a book and read while I was working and then
when I got out of work we’d go out to dinner and do our sight-seeing. But it was only for two
weeks. Well, three weeks when we were in Diego Garcia because that was such a long flight,
but it was a mini vacation. I mean, I still had to work my forty hours but I could go home to the
barracks and relax and I always took a crochet hook with me and I crocheted while I was in the
room. 43:11 Whenever I travel I either have a book or a crochet hook and I’d get to where I was
going for the two weeks and I’d crochet up an afghan while I was there and I’d leave it for
somebody. I’ve probably got afghans pretty much around the world because I’d make them up
and, you know, if you have to come home, you don’t have to do housework, you don’t have to
do dishes, you’ve got a lot of time on your hands. I mean, because most of the time when we
went away on a two weeks we stayed in the barracks and then weekends we’d go off and do our
sight-seeing when we weren’t working, and I just had little hands. Got to keep busy.
Interviewer: So how did your military career come to an end? 44:02 Was it something that
happened real quick that just had to make you stop or was it something that kid of just
dwindled down and you decided to resign?
Well, I had the three years and I got out because I was married and I had five stepchildren and
women could not have dependents. Then after, I think seven years later, I went back into the
reserve program and I stayed in the reserves for another seventeen years so I had a total of
twenty. Once I got my twenty in, it’s like, “Okay, no more getting up at 5:00 in the morning

�once a month. Darn. No more mini vacations, no more seeing the world.” I miss that part. I
miss the guys that I did the reserves with. That part I miss, because there’s…you know, you
watch these young kids grow up, have their families. You see them every month, one weekend a
month you see them. 45:01 And two weeks of the year we’d go and meet, go off and see the
world, do our job and come back. And then we’d come back to real life and go back to work
again. There’s nothing wrong with hard work.
Interviewer: Throughout your military career, what was your fondest memory that you
can always think of?
Fondest? I don’t know, I guess the experiences that I had in boot camp. I met some wonderful
women and my one girlfriend, we stayed in contact and I lost touch with her in the late ‘80s. I
know that she was in Beaumont, Texas, her and her husband. She was in the reserves, and they
had both gone into the reserves, and their daughters are probably producing grandchildren for
them now and I can’t find her. 46:04 So, the other day after your call I got on the computer and
looked up Bainbridge, Maryland where I went to boot camp and this is a picture that I had taken
off the site showing that “Through these portals pass the women of the greatest navy” of the
world and that’s where we had our company picture and I don’t know if there’s sites there that I
can find and try to locate her. If she starts looking at the military, hopefully we’ll get in contact
through Bainbridge. But one of the things that…this was my patch that I found last night
looking around, was on my uniform in boot camp, propellers and the anchor, and this was also a
hat device that we had on our hats. 47:04 I lost mine when I went out to Whidbey Island in
Washington state. I had it on my coat, on my jacket and it came off. This was my, when I went
to radioman school, I was a seaman second class and these uniforms were the seersucker that you
had to starch and starch and starch. They buttoned down the front, short sleeves, little A-line

�skirt, and they could not be above our knees. I was in the ‘70s. My girlfriend and I, we went to
the Navy ball when we were in radioman school together and, in the ‘70s hotpants were very,
very popular and I had made a lace hotpant suit and she had a hotpant suit with lace and we wore
white go-go boots. 48:08 We walked into the auditorium and there were generals and admirals
and gold scrambled eggs everywhere because the men wore the dress uniforms, all gold and
glitter and the women were in long formals and Jeannie and I came in there with hotpants.
Nobody said a word because we were dressed up. I mean, we had our hair done and we were all
in lace, but they were just short lace. And then, later when I went to radioman school then this
was my patch that I had on my uniform with the sparks for the radiomen. That was when I was
E4. And when I left the Navy I had made, this is a plaque from the Naval Investigative Service
under Naval Intelligence Command and this was signed by Captain Martin, and this shows that I
was radioman second class at that time. 49:10 And then later when I was in the reserves I made
radioman first class, which was an E6, and I did pass the test for E7 but I did not make the board
and I, to make E7 you also had to extend for two years and I almost had my twenty years in, and
I said that’s enough, I’ve got my twenty in and I’m done. So I retired as an E6.
Interviewer: What kind of things did you do, what was your life like after you were out of
the military?
When I retired or when I went back into the reserves?
Interviewer: When you retired?
When I retired? Now I’m just waiting out until I turn sixty and start receiving my retirement. I
work in my regular job during the day time and I have a part time job at Meijer’s, but eventually,
when I hit sixty, then I’ll start drawing my retirement pay. 50:16 And it won’t be a lot. The
whole time I was in, the seventeen years I was in, I used that money for an extra car payment so I

�always had a nice car which was a perk of being in the reserves. We got four days pay for one
weekend, and that was pretty cool. I got paid twice as much, you know, that’s the way the
reserve system works. So that was nice that it was set up that way. And then when we went
away for our two weeks, if we were overseas we got overseas pay for two weeks, so that was a
little extra.
Interviewer: Did you miss your job after you retired?
Not the job so much, because that’s a clerical type position but I miss the people. 51:05 Every
once in a while if I’m in Grand Rapids and it’s on the third weekend of the month I might run
into the reserve center to see who’s still there. I know that Bill is in Montcalm Sheriff and he
made chief and he stayed an extra couple of years but it’s been, since ’98 so I don’t think he’s
there any more so he’s probably retired up in Montcalm County. And I don’t…some of the other
people were from Allegan and different parts around west Michigan and I don’t get a chance to
run into them and I kind of miss seeing what they’re doing, how their kids are, but I guess I just
haven’t taken the time to check it out because it could be done. I just am too busy with other
things I guess.
Interviewer: So you still wish you could stay in contact with the people you’ve worked
with?
Yes. Just to say “hi” or “how are you doing?” or “let’s get together for a barbecue this summer,”
something like that. 52:05 See what you’ve done since you’ve gotten out of the Navy, because
we were all pretty close to the same age. Couple of them were a couple years younger but we
pretty much went through that seventeen years, or fifteen years here in Grand Rapids, together.
Interviewer: What’s the biggest thing that you have noticed that has changed about you
since you were in the military?

�I’ve grown up. I was a scared little country girl when I first, I mean, I wouldn’t even ride in a
taxi. To this day I still don’t ride in taxis. But I was very intimidated when I was younger. I
mean, I grew up, I went to a little one-room schoolhouse for a couple of years, and then I worked
in a factory and I finally joined the Navy, seen the world. It was like, wow, there’s a lot out
there. There’s a lot of opportunities out there. 53:08 There’s still things on my “honey do” list of
things I want to do in life that I haven’t done yet and I just hope that I’m still able to do them. I
mean, I want to learn how to play guitar one of these days but I don’t want to cut my nails
because I work with the public, I need to keep my nails artificially done. Shame on me, but those
little things like that. I want to go to northern France and meet my pen pal from high school.
We’re both in our fifties now. I don’t know if she’s still living there, but that’s one of my things
that I still want to do in life while I’m still young enough to do it. There are three states that I’ve
not been, either between the military with my travels or when I left California. 54:06 I drove out
there with my furniture when I went to California then drove back and came back a different way
but there are three states I’ve never been in. Hopefully, in the next three years we’ve got plans to
go and visit North and South Dakota and we’re going to spend two weeks just driving all over
the states, seeing things that I’ve never seen before. Alaska, I don’t know if I’ll ever get to
Alaska but maybe. But that’s one of my goals. I’m looking forward to retirement and we’re
going to travel, across, back and forth across the United States if we can afford gas. That’s an
issue that was not planned on.
Interviewer: Are you proud and happy that you were in the military? Are you proud of
what you have done?
Absolutely. That’s the best thing that I can recommend to someone who does not know what
they want to do in life is join the military, get some work experience, get a knowledge of away

�from a small town atmosphere. 55:12 When I went to boot camp there were girls from Hawaii,
there were girls from all over the United States. We were all together, living together for
fourteen weeks. We learned about different things that they did, we did and it gave us a direction
in life, even though we not necessarily stayed on the same direction, but it opened our eyes so we
traveled in many directions and many opportunities. There’s many opportunities out there. But I
would like to do some more things in life. I don’t know yet what I want to do when I grow up.
I’ve worked in the clerical, in the computer field and clerical for, I started working when I was
fourteen at A &amp; W so I’ve been working way too long. 56:08 I’m not going to add that up for
you. But when I joined the military I knew that I wasn’t going to come home and just work in
the factory like my parents did. I wanted something more. I think that chance to join the
military for any young person out of high school, unless they have a goal, a direction that they
want to take, the military will give them opportunities to choose and make decisions as to what
they want to do later in life. And you can always change it. People change their careers all the
time, but it gives you, it opens your eyes, opens your minds to greater opportunities, things that
could happen to you. And of course the discipline, I mean, the discipline, that was tough for me
but I managed and so did all the other girls. 57:10 There are things you have to do, and the work
ethic that I grew up with, you know, the animals were out in the barn. They couldn’t feed
themselves. We had to go out and feed them for them. We had to put the grain out there, we had
to put the hay down so I never…we grew up knowing that if there’s work to be done, it had to be
done and you go out there and do it. But the military teaches you, number one, discipline and it
gives you a push towards a good work ethic because you’ve got your job to do and you’ve got to
get it done. Mission complete. You don’t stop, you don’t go home at 4:00 just because it says to
clock out. You stay until your work is done and that was one of the things that with my

�background and my work ethic I had no problem with that. 58:07 If there’s work to be done,
you stay there until you get it done because, if we’ve got a message coming in that says there’s
an emergency that’s got to be taken care of. You can’t just stop and say, “Oh I’m sorry, it’s
4:00, I’ve got to go.” You don’t do that in the military. No way. Not on my watch.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536372">
                <text>Condon-Sharrock, Vikisu (Interview transcript and video), 2008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536373">
                <text>Condon-Sharrock, Vikisu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536374">
                <text>Vikisu Condon-Sharrock served in the Navy on active duty between 1971 and 1974, and remained in the reserves until 1998.  She discusses her experiences in training and on active duty when women were still very new to the regular service, as well as changes that have taken place since then in terms of women's opportunities in the Navy.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536375">
                <text>Riley, Kyle (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536376">
                <text> Lowell Area Historical Museum (Lowell, Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536378">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536379">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536380">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536381">
                <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536382">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536383">
                <text>United States. Navy</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536384">
                <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536385">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536386">
                <text>Women</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536387">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536388">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536389">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536390">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536395">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536396">
                <text>2008-02-21</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547507">
                <text>CondonSharrockV</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567270">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project Collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794745">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796810">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030865">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="53717" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58182">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/0eb13c37f3dfdf86c68736aa641f34aa.jpg</src>
        <authentication>0edcf339bf017e4c446b8a03ab072c7e</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993375">
                <text>RHC-183_D211-0011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993376">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993377">
                <text>1963-07-15</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993378">
                <text>Coney Island Amusement District</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993379">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a man promoting and selling tickets for an amusement park ride in Coney Island, New York, as a group of people pass by and listen. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993380">
                <text>Brooklyn (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993381">
                <text>Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993382">
                <text>Amusement rides</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993383">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993385">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993386">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993387">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993388">
                <text>1960s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1037858">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="53718" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58183">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9181c71cad0fbeb14444a91945214718.jpg</src>
        <authentication>0fbe5560f0f6a14c668e806759a8193f</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993389">
                <text>RHC-183_D211-0013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993390">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993391">
                <text>1963-07-15</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993392">
                <text>Coney Island Amusement District</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993393">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a street artist painting landscape paintings in front of a large crowd in Coney Island, New York. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993394">
                <text>Brooklyn (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993395">
                <text>Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993396">
                <text>Painters</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993397">
                <text>Landscape painters</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993398">
                <text>Artists</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993399">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993401">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993402">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993403">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993404">
                <text>1960s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1037859">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="53719" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58184">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9bbee000a84538a41bddc94c2c283a81.jpg</src>
        <authentication>ecbf577b69320f7eceb7c27b680a5d9f</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993405">
                <text>RHC-183_D211-0016</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993406">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993407">
                <text>1963-07-15</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993408">
                <text>Coney Island Amusement District</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993409">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a man standing and holding a radio up to his ear in Coney Island, New York. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993410">
                <text>Brooklyn (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993411">
                <text>Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993412">
                <text>Radio--Receivers and reception</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993413">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993415">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993416">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993417">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993418">
                <text>1960s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1037860">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="53720" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58185">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/94ac35075c31c6c3d58397bf14614513.jpg</src>
        <authentication>fbd2c18ae04fdac36732dd6ba8b18db5</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993419">
                <text>RHC-183_D211-0017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993420">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993421">
                <text>1963-07-15</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993422">
                <text>Coney Island Amusement District</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993423">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a street artist painting a portrait of a customer in front of a gathering of people in Coney Island, New York. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993424">
                <text>Brooklyn (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993425">
                <text>Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993426">
                <text>Painters</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993427">
                <text>Artists</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993428">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993430">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993431">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993432">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993433">
                <text>1960s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1037861">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="53738" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58203">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e75b17e077fd5cca76b80a018196b54f.jpg</src>
        <authentication>0e35239fde70e80c9d084c44abca4dbf</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993684">
                <text>RHC-183_D227-0016a</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993685">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993686">
                <text>1963-07-28</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993687">
                <text>Coney Island Amusement District</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993688">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a man standing outside and smiling in Coney Island, New York. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993689">
                <text>Brooklyn (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993690">
                <text>Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993691">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993693">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993694">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993695">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993696">
                <text>1960s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1037879">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="53739" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58204">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ca1bad4f7d1faebb5ca9c64b84c5107e.jpg</src>
        <authentication>20485074716f16cd19126fef2ee81344</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993697">
                <text>RHC-183_D227-0008a</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993698">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993699">
                <text>1963-07-28</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993700">
                <text>Coney Island Amusement District</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993701">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a man working at an amusement park game station in the Coney Island amusement district in Brooklyn, New York. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993702">
                <text>Brooklyn (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993703">
                <text>Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993704">
                <text>Amusement parks--New York (State)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993705">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993707">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993708">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993709">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993710">
                <text>1960s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1037880">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="53740" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58205">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/764535e5fb0dceb745ed08dcab3dbbf3.jpg</src>
        <authentication>5ba7dcc4f1a2285642de16b217d93e33</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="43">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832653">
                  <text>Douglas R. Gilbert Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832654">
                  <text>Gilbert, Douglas R., 1942-2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832655">
                  <text>Photographs scanned from negatives and transparencies from the Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183).&#13;
&#13;
Douglas R. Gilbert (b. 1942) is an American photographer from Michigan. He was born in Holland, Michigan and is the son of Russell W. and Carmen (Andree) Gilbert. Gilbert earned a B.A. in social sciences and art at Michigan State University in 1964, an M.S. in photography from the Institute of Design at Illinois Institute of Technology in 1972, and a M.S.W. from Salem State College in 1993. He is married to Barbara (McDonald) Gilbert, and has three daughters, Robyn, Rachel, and Anne. Gilbert took a serious interest in photography at the age of fourteen. In 1963 he joined the staff of Look magazine in New York as the second youngest photojournalist in the magazine's history. As a Look photographer from 1964 to 1966, he photographed folk musician Bob Dylan, the Newport Folk Festival, Simon and Garfunkel, the New York City Financial District, the children and facilities at the Manhattan School for Seriously Disturbed Children. From 1967 to 1969, Gilbert did several shoots, including that of folk singer Janis Ian for Life magazine. After moving to Chicago, Illinois in 1969 to attend the Illinois Institute of Technology, Gilbert conducted notable photo shoots of business and political figure Lenore Romney, and pursued more personal and artistic photography, focusing on urban and rural landscapes in Illinois and Michigan. He then joined the faculty of Wheaton College, where he taught from 1972 to 1982. In 1993, Gilbert graduated from Salem State College, Massachusetts, with a Masters in Social Work, and later pursued a second career as a psychotherapist. Douglas Gilbert died in June 2023. &#13;
&#13;
Throughout his photography career, he pursued both freelance commercial work as well as artistic work. His art photography is characterized by its classic black-and-white format, and features people, places and objects shot great attention and sensitivity. Gilbert's works are held in the permanent collections of the Art Institute of Chicago, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, and the Grand Valley State University Art Galleries, as well as in numerous private and institutional collections.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832656">
                  <text>1960-2011</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832657">
                  <text>&lt;a href="%E2%80%9Dhttps%3A//gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783%E2%80%9D"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert Papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832658">
                  <text>In Copyright</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832659">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="832660">
                  <text>Photography -- United States</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832661">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832662">
                  <text>RHC-183</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832663">
                  <text>Image</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832664">
                  <text>image/jpeg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="832665">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993711">
                <text>RHC-183_D228-0002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993712">
                <text>Gilbert, Douglas R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993713">
                <text>1963-07-28</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993714">
                <text>Coney Island Amusement District</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993715">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a group of people standing in line for an amusement ride in the Coney Island amusement district in Brooklyn, New York. Scanned from the negative.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993716">
                <text>Brooklyn (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993717">
                <text>Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993718">
                <text>Amusement parks--New York (State)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="993719">
                <text>Amusement rides</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993720">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/783"&gt;Douglas R. Gilbert papers (RHC-183)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993722">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993723">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993724">
                <text>image/jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="993725">
                <text>1960s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1037881">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
