<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=128&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-04-27T00:27:25-04:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>128</pageNumber>
      <perPage>24</perPage>
      <totalResults>26018</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="52460" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="56963">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/da3d978564f05a1c42a9d2cc6631029b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>748b8b29e08c84f29b1aad29b50b28e7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="973513">
                    <text>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:

ANGELA LIND

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1975
477-1540

JOSE JIMENEZ, 46th WARD ALDER.MANIC CANDIDATE, PUBLISHES COMPLETE LIST OF CAMPAIGN
INCOME AND EXPENSES: CALLS ON REGULARS TO DO SAME.
Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez, 46th Ward Aldermanic candidate, issued the following
statement this morning.
"In the last months of this campaign I have been viciously and slanderously
attacked by my opponent, the present alderman of the 46th ward.

Among other charges,

he has stated to voters and to reporters that the fi.nancing of my campaign came from
'suspicious' sources.

His campaign workers have even said that my campaign was

finance d by the sale of drugs.

I am here today to put an end to these vicious rumors

by making a complete disclosure of my campaign finances, as I promised when my

candidacy was announced, and to call upon my opponent to do the same.
"I have filed my financial statements with the Board of Elections, which according

to Illinois State law, all candidates must do.

At the same time, this law only

requires a disclosure of finances beginning January 1, 1975.

Candidates may have

gathered in many hidde n contributions before that date and not be required legally to
disclose them.

Therefore I am making a full disclosure of!.!! campaign contributions

and expenditures since the beginning of my campaign.
"I am proud of the spirit of sacrifice that has made this campaign possible.

When we announced in June and even months prior to that, ordinary people, factory
workers and residents of this community had pooled their salaries to live more cheaply,
- more -

�and put money away in savings for this campaign.
sold at up to Sl a button.

Thousands of buttons have been

Many small contribut1.ons have come from concerned people

throuohout the ward and the city.

Artists and printers have donated their skills

and many are alAo working in the precincts.

Commur1ity organi.zations have allowed

t he campaiqn te1 use their mimeographing equipment and typewriters.

It has been

and is a real community based campaign that through hard work and sacrifice has
become an effective and professionally run campaign.

All campaiqn staff are

volunteer; there are no paid staff nor public relations consultants.
"I am calling on my opponent to disclose

~

finances as fully as I have: to

open ~p the records of the 46th ward regular organization and disclose his backers
to the public,

I am calling also for an end to rumors and mudslinging on the part

of his campaign and a return to a campaign based on the issues that affect the people
of our ward.
"We are confident of victory, because of the support of the people and because

of the commitment and self-sacrifice of our campaign workers."

SEE ATTACJ~D FINANCIAL INFORMATION

�NEWS

FROM • • •

Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez, 3500 N. Broadway,
Chicago, Ill. 60657

ADDITIONAL MATERIAIS,
SEE ACCOMPANYING RELEASE

FEBRUARY 11, 1975

For More Information, Please Contact:
Angela Lind
477-1540

FOR

IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

JOSE JIMENEZ, 46th WARD ALDERMANIC CANDIDATE, PUBLISHES COMPLETE LIST OF CAMPAIGN
INCOME AND EXPENSES;

1.

Following is a summary of income and expenditures of this campaign for the
period August, 1974 through February 8, 1975 by category.
A.

Income
1.

2.
3.
4.
TOTAL:

B.

5~

6.
7.

a.

9.

10.
11.
12.
TOTAL:

c.

$5,509.62
1,956.61
210.77
1,165.21
8,842.21

-

general contributions
through sale of campaign buttons
collections at parties &amp; meetings
loans

-

printing
paper &amp; other office materials
postage
rent (includes security deposit)
utilities (includes phone deposits)
buttons
rental of billboard space
radio time
lumber &amp; other conatruction supplies
typesetting &amp; art supplies

Expenditures
1.
2.
3.
4.

$2,916.75
360.89
1,025.00
1,125.00
824.46
255.00
648.00
120.00
66.22
132.87
234.52
35.88
7,744.59

food

miscellaneous

Balance

Total Income
Total Expenditures
BALANCE FORWARD
2.

CALLS ON REGULARS TO DO SAME.

8,842.21
7,744.59
1,097.62

On Deposit
cash On Hand
BALANCE FORWARD

+

1,000.00
97.62
1,097.62

Following is a list of income for the period August, 1974 through February 8, 1975
by month.
A.

August, 1974
Button Sales
John Miscunski
Pierre LeBreton
TOTAL

294.50
250.00
100.00
644.50
- MORE -

�p. 2 of
supplement

CITIZENS FOR JOSE CHA-CHA JIMBNEZ
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued)

February 11, 1975
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

JIMENEZ CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL INFORMATION (continued)
2.

List of income by month (continued)
B.

Septernber, 1974
NONE

c.

October, 1974
NON£

o.

November, 1974
Button Sales
Fat Kaplan
Robert Howard
Cesaro. Ballaftos
John Walsh
Elizabeth White
Sol Golden
Faith Schumaker
Susan Rosenbloom
Nick Norris
John Rossen
Steven Gold
Adeline Kashmere
Paul Siegel

James Ratner
Thomas Lindsey
TOTAL
E.

332 .11
224.00
20.00
30.00
10.00
10.00
10.00

s.oo

250.00
10.00
15.00
250.00
2.40

126.72
64.00
75.00
1,434.23

Decetllber, 1974
Collections
Button Sales
Catherine Archibald
Karen Richardson
Candy Espada
Gloria Perez
David Ballestas
Robin Kaufman
G. Marie Leaner
Manuel Barbosa
Joan Wallace
J. Hart
Marc Kaplan
c. M:::Millan
Faith Schumacker
Bob Gibson
John Sales

44. 77
487.00
250.00
20.00
2.00
10.00
10.00

s.oo

5.00
15.00
250.00
250.00
250.00
1.00

11.00
20.00
10.00
- MORE -

�p. !

~~BaUMY l l , 1975

c,~

supplement
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued)

for IMMEDIATE RELEASE

JIMENEZ CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL INFORMATION (continued)

2.

List of income by month (continued)
E.

December, 1974 (continued)
Chris Colon
Eugene Eulingberg
Barbara Lowenstein
Sidney Lens
Susan Avila
Paul Terkel
E. Cose
Leroi Jones
Zonzie
Lorraine Blue
Linda Turner
Frederick Spaulding
John Block
R. Bady
Ben Rodriguez

F.

25.00
25.00

s.oo

10.00
2.00

s.oo

.so

s.oo
10.00

TOTAL

15.00

s.oo
25 . 00

so .oo

25 .0C

s.oo

__
10 .00

2 ,4 18.27
650. 00
3,068 . 27

300.00
200.00
10.00
25.00

January, 1975

Collections
Benefits
Jeri Riddle
Frank Oliver
Ida Terkel
Rose Ratner
Sl!muel Betances
H.s. Morrison
Edwin Vagas
Alberto Mata
Margaret Schmidt
Richard Jackson
Toby Prinz
Henrietta Moore
Herman Gruber
Louise Chapman
G.

Carmello Rodr ig ue2
Nanette Rutherfor d
Pat Hughes
Sy lvia Ste ··art
Vera Lea f Pearl
Max Torres
Milton Certer
SUBTOTAL
Loan - Campaign for
Commun ity Contro l

10.00
10.00

Carl MacKi
Arnie O!-:an"':
Richard C,:fr1en
George Atk ins
Carol A. ~ola Hawk
Paul Moreno
Frank &amp; Vivian Archer
Jorge Betluchamp
Pe ul &amp; Heather B::,ct:
Miguel Chevere
Steve Romero
Randy Salt z
Cami lle Nash
SUBTOTAL
Loan - J ~mes Chaprran
TOTAL

22.00
93.00
20.00
25.00
75.00
15.00

75.00
1.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
10.00

5.00

rn.oo

10.00

20.00

1.00
5.00
20&lt;'

,v

250 . 00

·2 .co

.!

5 .oo

:.s .oo
10. 00
20 .00
1s.00
5 . U(

360.0C
1 20 . 00
1,519 .oo

515.21
2,0 34.21

February 1st through 8th, 1975
A. Kautt
James Chapman
Fred Walker
Ellis Lev in

Collections
51.00
Buttons
843.00
Higni thio Lucas
10.00
Shirley Clark
5.00
Carlos Delgado
s.oo
Joe Giola
25.00
Hilda Frontaney
2.00
w.H. Ferry &amp; Carol
Bernstein Ferry
500.00
Jack Spiegel
30.00
Laurie &amp; Pierre LeBretonlS.00
K. Hummer
5 . 00

Roger s ~.enkiew:i.e~

John Bleck
Melvin Thurman
Carmen Velez
Lambert King
Norman Palmer
Thomas Shefcik
Pat
- MORE -

&amp;

Tom Timm

s .oo
10.00

5.00
1 0 . 00

5 . 00
10 .C'}

s.oo

10.00

so.co
25.00
10.00
25.00
1, 6 0 1 . 00

�CITIZENS FOR JOSE CHA-CHA JIMENEZ

p. 4

of

FEBRUARY

11, 1975

supplement
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

JIMENEZ CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL INFORMATION (continued)
3.

Following is a list of expenditures for the period August, 1974 through February 8 ,
1975 by month.
A.

August, 1974
End of Month Balance:

644.50

120.00 - radio time
255.00 - buttons
7.06
End of Month Balance:
382.06

262.44

End of Month Balance:

262.44

NONE

B.

September, 1974
WEOC

Artesian Specialties
Bank Charges
'l'OTAL:

c.

$

October, 1974
NONE

D.

November, 1974
Kenny Paper Co.
Metro Media
Progress Press
Globe Posters
A &amp; E Rubber Stamp
Wagner Litho
Midwest Printing
Kenny Paper Co.
u.s. Post Office

224.00
648.00
110.00
557.50
2.40
196.00
64.00
126.72
75.00
2,003.62

-

paper
rental of 12 large billboards for 3 monthA •·
printing
printing
rubber stamp
printing
printing
paper
postage
End of Month Balance:
-306.95

Computype
50.00
Tony Karnezis
375.00
Tony Karnezis
375.00
Waqner Litho
227.00
Illinois Bell Telephone 78.25
Ill. Bell Tel.
200.00
Wagner Litho
92.00
u.s. Post Office
300.00
Bank Charges
2.30
W.gner Litho
29.50
.u.s. Post Office
650.00
TOTAL:
2,379 .OS

-

typesetting
security deposit
rent
printing
advance payment
phone deposit
printing
postage

TOTAL

E.

F.

December, 1974

- printing
- postage
End of Month Balance:

January, 1975
Computype
Miscellaneous

75.00
4.20
4.15
7.87

-

typesetting
office supplies
lumber
art supplies
- more -

382.27

�CITIZENS FOR JOSE CHA-CHA JIMENEZ

p. 5 of
supplement

FEBRUARY

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (continued)

Fl:&gt;R IMMEDIATE RELEASE

JIMENEZ CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3.

11, 1975

(continued)

List of expenditures by month (continued)
F.

January, 1975 (continued)

Tony Karnez i8
Bank Adjustment
Berland Printing
Ill. Bell Telephone
Berland Printing
TOTAL
G.

26 • 54
201.24
31.00
375.00
20.25
360.00
515.21
120.00
1,740.46

-

food for warkers ' part,,
for voter registrution day
phone
rent
bounced check
printing
phones
printing
End of Month Baliince:
676.02
:food

February 1st through 8th, 1975

so.co -

Office

L

SUBTOTAL
Cash carried
forward
Berland Printing
Bank Charges
Berland Printing
TOTAL

25.34
3.57
6.74
13.13
48.78

-

see breakdown below
lumber &amp; varnish
office supplies
food

lumber for signs

1.22 _/
870.75 - printing
6.27
290.00 - printing
23.60 - lumber for signs
1,239.40
End of Period Balance:

- 30 -

1,097.62

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="24">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="446395">
                  <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447054">
                  <text>Young Lords (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765923">
                  <text>Puerto Ricans--United States</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765924">
                  <text>Civil Rights--United States--History</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765925">
                  <text>Lincoln Park (Chicago, Ill.)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765926">
                  <text>Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765927">
                  <text>Social justice</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765928">
                  <text>Community activists--Illinois--Chicago</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447055">
                  <text>Collection of oral history interviews and digitized materials documenting the history of the Young Lords Organization in Lincoln Park, Chicago. Interviews were conducted by Young Lords' founder, José “Cha-Cha” Jiménez, and documents were digitized from Mr. Jiménez' archives.&#13;
&#13;
The Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection grows out of the ongoing struggle for fair housing, self-determination, and human rights that was launched by Mr. José “Cha-Cha” Jiménez, founder of the Young Lords Movement. This project is dedicated to documenting the history of the displacement of Puerto Ricans, Mejicanos, other Latinos, and the poor from Lincoln Park, as well as the history of the Young Lords nationwide. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447056">
                  <text>Jiménez, José, 1948-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447057">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/491"&gt;Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection (RHC-65)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447058">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447059">
                  <text>2017-04-25</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447060">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447061">
                  <text>video/mp4&#13;
application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447062">
                  <text>eng&#13;
spa</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447063">
                  <text>Moving Image&#13;
Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447064">
                  <text>RHC-65</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447065">
                  <text>2012-2017</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973494">
                <text>RHC-65_1975-02-11_aldermanic-press-release</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973495">
                <text>Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973496">
                <text>1975-02-11</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973497">
                <text>José Cha-Cha Jiménez Campaign Finance Disclosure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973498">
                <text>Press release from Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez regarding Jiménez' campaign finance disclosure and calls for opponents to do the same.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973499">
                <text>Young Lords (Organization)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973500">
                <text>Young Lords (Organization) History</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973501">
                <text>Puerto Rican Civil rights</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973502">
                <text>Puerto Rican Social conditions</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973503">
                <text> Chicago (Ill.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973504">
                <text>Civil rights movements</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973505">
                <text>Community activists</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973506">
                <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection (RHC-65)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973507">
                <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park interviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973508">
                <text>In Copyright</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973509">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973510">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973511">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973512">
                <text>1970s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="52461" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="56964">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/5508d1e6e026f312d4c937d1d50f75b3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7cec31f6d542b657544a48f116c9049f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="973533">
                    <text>JOSE CHA-CHA JIMENEZ
Candidate for Alderman 46th Ward
will

Speak

on

Tues. Feb. 11th

at

Stockton School
4420 N. Beacon St
SPONSORED BY STOCKTON SCHOOL PARENT ADVISORY COUNCIL

at

8pm

come, listen . .. discuss the
issues in our community
Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez 3500 N. Broadway, Chicago, Ill. 60657
334-9556
549-9457
477-1540

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="24">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="446395">
                  <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447054">
                  <text>Young Lords (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765923">
                  <text>Puerto Ricans--United States</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765924">
                  <text>Civil Rights--United States--History</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765925">
                  <text>Lincoln Park (Chicago, Ill.)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765926">
                  <text>Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765927">
                  <text>Social justice</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765928">
                  <text>Community activists--Illinois--Chicago</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447055">
                  <text>Collection of oral history interviews and digitized materials documenting the history of the Young Lords Organization in Lincoln Park, Chicago. Interviews were conducted by Young Lords' founder, José “Cha-Cha” Jiménez, and documents were digitized from Mr. Jiménez' archives.&#13;
&#13;
The Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection grows out of the ongoing struggle for fair housing, self-determination, and human rights that was launched by Mr. José “Cha-Cha” Jiménez, founder of the Young Lords Movement. This project is dedicated to documenting the history of the displacement of Puerto Ricans, Mejicanos, other Latinos, and the poor from Lincoln Park, as well as the history of the Young Lords nationwide. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447056">
                  <text>Jiménez, José, 1948-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447057">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/491"&gt;Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection (RHC-65)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447058">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447059">
                  <text>2017-04-25</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447060">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447061">
                  <text>video/mp4&#13;
application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447062">
                  <text>eng&#13;
spa</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447063">
                  <text>Moving Image&#13;
Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447064">
                  <text>RHC-65</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447065">
                  <text>2012-2017</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973514">
                <text>RHC-65_1975-02-11_en-aldermanic-poster</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973515">
                <text>Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973516">
                <text>1975-02-11</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973517">
                <text>Jiménez Campaign Flyer</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973518">
                <text>Campaign flyer for José Cha-Cha Jiménez speaking engagement on February 11, 1975, in English.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973519">
                <text>Young Lords (Organization)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973520">
                <text>Young Lords (Organization) History</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973521">
                <text>Puerto Rican Civil rights</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973522">
                <text>Puerto Rican Social conditions</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973523">
                <text> Chicago (Ill.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973524">
                <text>Civil rights movements</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973525">
                <text>Community activists</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973526">
                <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection (RHC-65)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973527">
                <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park interviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973528">
                <text>In Copyright</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973529">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973530">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973531">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973532">
                <text>1970s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="52462" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="56965">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/419151e8b750660a852d26e46d13b001.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0ec313775c897ed2608fe2ecbe5041c1</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="973553">
                    <text>JOSE CHA-CHA JIMENEZ
Candiclato por Alderman Ward ·
. 46

Hablarli
el

Martes ·11 de Feb.

en

La Escuela Stockton
4420 N. Beacon St

PATROCINAOO POR EL CONSEJO DE PADRES DE LA ESCUELA STOCKTON

a las 8pm

venga, escuche y discuta
pr
...as de nuestra
comunidad
Ciudadanos para Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez 3500 N. Broadway, Chicago, Ill. 60657

334-9556

549-9457

477 -1540

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="24">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="446395">
                  <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447054">
                  <text>Young Lords (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765923">
                  <text>Puerto Ricans--United States</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765924">
                  <text>Civil Rights--United States--History</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765925">
                  <text>Lincoln Park (Chicago, Ill.)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765926">
                  <text>Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765927">
                  <text>Social justice</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765928">
                  <text>Community activists--Illinois--Chicago</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447055">
                  <text>Collection of oral history interviews and digitized materials documenting the history of the Young Lords Organization in Lincoln Park, Chicago. Interviews were conducted by Young Lords' founder, José “Cha-Cha” Jiménez, and documents were digitized from Mr. Jiménez' archives.&#13;
&#13;
The Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection grows out of the ongoing struggle for fair housing, self-determination, and human rights that was launched by Mr. José “Cha-Cha” Jiménez, founder of the Young Lords Movement. This project is dedicated to documenting the history of the displacement of Puerto Ricans, Mejicanos, other Latinos, and the poor from Lincoln Park, as well as the history of the Young Lords nationwide. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447056">
                  <text>Jiménez, José, 1948-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447057">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/491"&gt;Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection (RHC-65)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447058">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447059">
                  <text>2017-04-25</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447060">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447061">
                  <text>video/mp4&#13;
application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447062">
                  <text>eng&#13;
spa</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447063">
                  <text>Moving Image&#13;
Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447064">
                  <text>RHC-65</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447065">
                  <text>2012-2017</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973534">
                <text>RHC-65_1975-02-11_sp-aldermanic-poster</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973535">
                <text>Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973536">
                <text>1975-02-11</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973537">
                <text>Jiménez Campaign Flyer</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973538">
                <text>Campaign flyer for José Cha-Cha Jiménez speaking engagement on February 11, 1975, in Spanish.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973539">
                <text>Young Lords (Organization)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973540">
                <text>Young Lords (Organization) History</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973541">
                <text>Puerto Rican Civil rights</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973542">
                <text>Puerto Rican Social conditions</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973543">
                <text> Chicago (Ill.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973544">
                <text>Civil rights movements</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973545">
                <text>Community activists</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973546">
                <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection (RHC-65)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973547">
                <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park interviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973548">
                <text>In Copyright</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973549">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973550">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973551">
                <text>spa</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973552">
                <text>1970s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="52465" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="56968">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/44815d18940306396c758bf10cb1d7ec.pdf</src>
        <authentication>af4171d75c6ae044be1367717acb6294</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="973613">
                    <text>NOVEMBER 18, 197 4

FROM:

Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez
1046 w. Wilson Ave. - - Suite 202

FOR FURTHER I1'.'!f'ORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

Angela Lind

549-9457

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

JOSE JIMENEZ CALLS FOR CITY AND STATE ACTION ON HOUSING CRISIS
IN TESTIMONY BEFORE STATE SPANISH SPEAKING STUDY COMMISSION
J ose Cha-Cha J i menez, Aldermanic candidate in the 46th ward,
present ed today to the State's Spanish Speaking Peoples Study commission
a series of recommendations for immediate action by state and city
government to help stabilize communities throughout Chicago which are
currently facing a major housing crisis.

Tl:ie two strongest recommenda-

tions called for careful monitoring and immediate action to insure that the
millions of newly released federal Housing and Community Developnent
Act dollars flowing into the city and state actually be used for
low and moderate income housing.

Also outlined was a new City Council

ordinance which would require that landlords place security deposits with
the city to be used for emergency repair of serious health and safety
hazards.
In an interview after his tes t imony, Jimenez emphasized that over
40 million dollars ( only a first i nstallment) is corning into the city
right away.

Documenting the city's past practices of using federal dollars

to reloca te slums instead of rehabilit ating them, Jimenez demanded full
citizen participation in planning how the new money will be spent.
He warned that without strong action by the City Council and state government Chicagoans will be faced by another decade of deteriorating and
unstable neighborhoods.

"Just last year, in 1973, twice as many housing

Ltnits were destroyed as were built here in the city of Chicago.
many of those new units were luxury apartments.

M () R

F.

And

Where is the low and

�page 2

moderate income housing?"
In another important recommendation to the Commission. Jimenez
testified ''We have an enormous problem in this city of serious safety
and health hazards in apartment buildings which the city is all too
often powerless to correct.

To help eliminate these dangers, I am

proposing a City Council ordinance that would require landlords to
deposit funds with the city as security to be used for emergency repairs
in cases when owners do not take prompt action to correct these conditions
on their own.

This ordinance is designed to remove major safety

violations and help control the further deterioration of so many of
our homes."
Interest less a small administrative fee would be returned to the
landlords on their security deposits of $100 per unit with a maximum
limit of $20,000 per owner.

Jimenez urged the Commission to devise

comparabie legislation at the state level.
He

also asked the Commission to support local efforts for citizen

control of zoning --land use-- such as the Community Zoning Board
Ordinance now before the City Council.

And he pointed to Rep. Joe

Lundy's House Bill 1345 now pending in Springfield as an important
step in safeguarding the interests of the majority of urban residents
who are apartment renters.
Jimenez' recommendations came after a vivid description of the
history of the Latino community's long struggle for decent housing
and stable neighborhoods.

''We must be allowed to contribute ideas

and participate actively at every level of government •••• we desperately
need and want stable communities."
30

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="24">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="446395">
                  <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447054">
                  <text>Young Lords (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765923">
                  <text>Puerto Ricans--United States</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765924">
                  <text>Civil Rights--United States--History</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765925">
                  <text>Lincoln Park (Chicago, Ill.)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765926">
                  <text>Personal narratives</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765927">
                  <text>Social justice</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765928">
                  <text>Community activists--Illinois--Chicago</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447055">
                  <text>Collection of oral history interviews and digitized materials documenting the history of the Young Lords Organization in Lincoln Park, Chicago. Interviews were conducted by Young Lords' founder, José “Cha-Cha” Jiménez, and documents were digitized from Mr. Jiménez' archives.&#13;
&#13;
The Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection grows out of the ongoing struggle for fair housing, self-determination, and human rights that was launched by Mr. José “Cha-Cha” Jiménez, founder of the Young Lords Movement. This project is dedicated to documenting the history of the displacement of Puerto Ricans, Mejicanos, other Latinos, and the poor from Lincoln Park, as well as the history of the Young Lords nationwide. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447056">
                  <text>Jiménez, José, 1948-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447057">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/491"&gt;Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection (RHC-65)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447058">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447059">
                  <text>2017-04-25</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447060">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447061">
                  <text>video/mp4&#13;
application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447062">
                  <text>eng&#13;
spa</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447063">
                  <text>Moving Image&#13;
Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447064">
                  <text>RHC-65</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="447065">
                  <text>2012-2017</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973594">
                <text>RHC-65_1975-11-18_aldermanic-press-release</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973595">
                <text>Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973596">
                <text>1975-11-18</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973597">
                <text>Press Release: Housing Crisis</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973598">
                <text>"Jose Jimenez calls for city and state action on housing crisis in testimony before State Spanish Speaking Study Commission," press release of Citizens for Jose Cha-Cha Jimenez.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973599">
                <text>Young Lords (Organization)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973600">
                <text>Young Lords (Organization) History</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973601">
                <text>Puerto Rican Civil rights</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973602">
                <text>Puerto Rican Social conditions</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973603">
                <text> Chicago (Ill.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973604">
                <text>Civil rights movements</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="973605">
                <text>Community activists</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973606">
                <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park collection (RHC-65)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973607">
                <text>Young Lords in Lincoln Park interviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973608">
                <text>In Copyright</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973609">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973610">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973611">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="973612">
                <text>1970s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54611" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58882">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/f57873d2b4c2a40eb5f2873888611a83.pdf</src>
        <authentication>931cc4c357fcac87c19d38e569ddfeb3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1006928">
                    <text>&lt;
&lt;
&lt;

_j-

R·I

Q.

L--

:,:

--t-

R·I

(I)

z
3'
0

....

@

R·I

ONE

FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL

@

R-2

ONE

FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL

@

R-3

ONE

FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL

(8

R-4

ONE

FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL

~ MHP

MOBILE

Q

RM-I

MULTIPLE

FAMILY

(LOW

RISE)

C:,

RM· 2

MULTIPLE

FAMILY

(LOW

RISE)

( ] ) RM ·3

MULTIPLE

FAMILY

oo

OFFICE

II

@&amp;

B-1

LIMITED

·1

•

B-2

GENERAL

@

SP

SPECIAL

Q

FP

FLOODPLAIN

0

"'

0

HOME

PARK

~

QC

7
OF

PONTIAC

SP
Oolllond

"'

Un1vers,1y

(HIGH

RISE)

BUSINESS
BUSINESS
PURPOSE

@T8R

TECHNOLOGY

QI-I

LIGHT

~ I-2

GENERAL

•

HEAVY

*
8

RESEARCH

i

\:

INDUSTRIAL

0

CIC

~'

T8R

.

.,

I:•/

•/

I-3

INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL

SP

@LF

T8R

*

LANDFILL

THE ~LOOOPLAIN BOUNOARY 1S GENERAL:ZEO ON THIS MAP EXACT BOUNDA"11ES CAN BE
:lETERM!~EO BY CONTACTING THE MICHIGAN OEPARl MENT OF NATURAL RE~CUR:ES OR
THE U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGtNEERS

I, VERONICA C NEW, CLERK OF THE CITY OF" ~UBURN HILLS. DO HEREBY CERTIFY ThAT THJS
MAP IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ZONING MAP ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUf-..CIL OF THE ClTY
OF AUBURN HILLS ON• THE !6 TH DAY OF ..Q.E':l'.MBER , ~ A O AND All SU85FOUENT
AMENDMENTS ADOPTED AS Qf:" OCTOBER 17 1qsa

~

~...2k,.,-

1ERVN ;A
1..,1TY

-.irw , C

- ~ AUBURN

ERi(

HII tS

OFFICIAL

ZON ING
CITY

OF

AUBURN

CITY OF AUBURN

Scale

£

aoo

A

I

1•00

:1•00

no&lt;1

(iJwyie~i« ~Ianni&gt;'? ,.#~i.aleJ~ fl'.~
BLOOM FIELD

tObt 911

~

IPUIH

ILYP

,

C

~

BL OO M , i [ L O

TO WNSHIP

I

I

HILLS

HILLS PLANNING

Feet

,....._
o

MAP

HfLLS . MIC HIGAN

COMMISSION

�DUTTON

DEVELOPMENT

C:»

RESIDENTIAL

.SIGNIFICANT

NON - RESIDENTIAL

•

SIGNIFICANT

DEVELOPMENT

0

PUBLIC

l

z

SIGNIFICANT

PROPOSALS

;o
0

City

of

Loke

Angelus

0

.cJ

LA K

PROBLEMS

£
.4NGELVS

"

ARROWHEAD

GOLF COURSE

7 ~ ,.. .,.. _ /

!

PONTI A C

0 F

II

...

I

,.~✓===~--==

• 0 •

,

".

. .t?

..

(

';.

:.,

;;

-~

THIS PLAN IS NTENDEO TO SHOW GENERAL1ZED LANO USE ANO JS
NOT INTENOEO TO INDICATE PREC ISE SIZE, SHAPE OR DIMENSION
THESE PROPOSALS REFLECT FUTURE LONG RANGE LANO USE
RECOMMENDAT IONS ANO 00 NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY
SHORT RANGE
REZONING PROPOSALS
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ACT 285 OF THE M,CH l GAN
PUBLIC ACTS OF 1931 , AS AMENDED, THE CITY OF AUBURN HILLS
PLANNING COMMISS I ON HAVING DULY HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON
SEPTEMBER 25, 19B6 . DOES
HEREBY OFFICIALLY ADOPT
SAID
MASTER
PLAN FOR LAND USE

~
_,

r

1.

OAKL.A ND ',

t

. .·

?,;}=. ··:, ;:.-:(. .• ..... :·~·=-o -~

I.
'•
~

·. •

. UNIVERSITY ' ,

.
.

.

rr

.,

.

0

"'
...
"'
"'uI

DECEMBER

.

. .

'

.

~

~· .

)

4 , 19B6

ADOPTED

0

a:

0

ATT ESTED

...u

Cv o, .;,,Q
CHAIRMAN

•

I\

0

a:

:...~.-: ~

JlY

~

~~~~/

SECREARY

,,

&lt;"

L

GENERALIZED
LONG RANGE
MASTER

LAND

USE

PLAN

CITY

AUBURN

OF

CITY OF AUBURN

HILLS

HILLS PLANNING

NOVEMBER • 19B6
PUBLIC

HEARING

SEPTEMBER

::.

~ ----,oo

0

25 , 19B6

A

F111

11100

1400

i

3100

BLOOMFIELD

GQLF

QR

.-F" SOUTH

IILYO

~

BLOOMFIELD

TOWNSHI P

H ILLS. MICHIGAN

COMMISSION

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006911">
                <text>Auburn-Hills_Maps_1986-1988</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006912">
                <text>City of Auburn Hills Planning Commission, City of Auburn Hills, Oakland County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006913">
                <text>1986-1988</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006914">
                <text>Maps</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006915">
                <text>The Generalized Long Range Master Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance maps were prepared by the City of Auburn Planning Commission with the assistance of Progressive Planning Associates, P.C. The Land Use Map was adopted on December 4, 1986, and the Zoning Ordinance map was adopted on October 17, 1988.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006916">
                <text>Progressive Planning Associates, P.C. (consultants)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006917">
                <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006918">
                <text>Land use--planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006919">
                <text>maps</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006920">
                <text>Auburn Hills (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006921">
                <text>Oakland County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006922">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006924">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006925">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006926">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1006927">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038236">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54618" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58889">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/2aa431081619cbe179dd13ec71beb3d8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>bff545e0209adaa8a2bc02a2a3f266d4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1007035">
                    <text>z
cc

...I

A.

=
~

I-

en

cc

:i:

&gt;
1-

-

( .)

&gt;
cc

m
LI.I

=
IFROM THE LIBRARY QFi
Plannlng &amp; Zonlng Center, Inc.

�e11

THE BAY CITY MASTER PLAN

�CI TY

0F

MAS T E R

B AY

CI TY

P L A. N

PREPARED BY
CITY OF BAY CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

301

WASHINGTON AVENUE

BAY CI TY, r1 I CH I GAN

�:. - ,·- · -. -,.
CITY OF BAY CITY
/\11t1P. R. llachtel, Mayor

CITY COMMISSION
Ti111othy G. Sullivan
Ward W. VanDerwi 11 , I I
l&lt;obed Moehr i e
Dr~I ores M. Ludwig
l&lt;i ctiard J. Laskowski
Michael l.l . Marti11dc1lr
l llo111a c, /\. 13a i ,·d
Terr y Sutter
,loll11 M. llc1rt111a11

rLANNING COMMISSION
Mark Zunolti
Gerald E. Carroll
Vincent Duranceau
Wi 11 i am J. Grundner
?u nr Lurive

CITY STAFF
Eell' l Ki v i s to , Ci t y P1 a11 n e rRu c; sel l Lundberg, /\ssista11t Planner
I(
1: . McGi 11 ivr-ay, Dhector of Community Development
/\l McFudyen, Director of Redevelop111ent &amp; Housing Services
llonuld lleffelbower, City Engineer
\Ii 11 ic1111 \fright, Dit-ectni- of Dovmtown Development Authol'ity

�•
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
3111 N . Wi\S!IIIJ1;1 ,, r,

., vr

CITY OF BAY CITY
BAY CII/

MI CHIGAN

48 706

/\pril, 19112

H1:

CITI7ENS OF BAY CITY /\ND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED
Itl /\ GETTER CITY Ifl vii I I Cl! TO LI VE AND WORK

1hr c1ttached Master rla11 is the officially adopted long-range comprehensive plan used

by the Bay City Planning Co1rnnission as their general guide in making land use, transpnl'lc1tion, and c0t11111unit_y ft1cilities decisions.
Thi s plan i s based on The Bay City Plan prepared for the City by Gerald Luedtke and
/\:,sociatr.s . A large 11u111ber of the "Luedtke" plans were printed and distributed
throughout the City. flu111erous meetings and discussion s were held on the Luedtke plan.
Se veral changes were suggested. Many of these changes are incorporated in the attached
Master Plan whict1 we fee l now represents what most people want our City to be like in
tl1r~ future.
It is the rlanning Comrnission's intent to up-date this plan every five years to reflect
changes in values, technology and socio-economic conditions. Your comments on ways to
improv e thi s plan a1 ·e v1clcome.
Pr' ~ p e c t f u 11y s ubm i t t ecl ,

1\/\Y CllY PL/\NNIMG COMMISSIOM

r-1,ll'k 7 annl l i

r I1.1 i 1·111 il 11
r-11 / q_j l1

�! W 1 • : • 1- 1W 1

FOREW/\RD
Tl1e Bay City Plan sets for·th recommendations for public and private development
during the next 20 years. The plan is concerned with the physical, economic,
social, and aesthetic development and improvement of the city. The plan was
prepured through intensive discussions with community organizations and
individual citizens throughout Bay City during the past year. This is a bold plan.
Bay City is an older city which needs such a bold plan with innovative and farreaching ideas if it is to remain viable and to grow. As this plan is implemented
through the years, it will be revised and changed many times; but the basic ideas
upon which the plan is founded should remain valid for several decades. This plan
should serve as a challenge to the leaders of Bay City to seek the highest quality
of future development in the city.

�·r/\BLE OF CONTENTS

P/\GE
LI ST OF ILLUSTRATION S
f

1

L/\NNING DETERMINANT S

l1L/\NN I NG ) SSUES

i i

1
6

POLICIES OF THE PLAN

lS

CONSERVATION OF EXI STING NEIGHBORHOODS

21

llEw Hous I NG DEVELOrMErn

27

n1vERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

35

[oMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

4fJ

ll! GH-/\ccESSIBILITY DEVELOPMENT AREAS

47

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

11~

OPEN SPACE

54

IIIOROUGHF/\RE SYSTEM

57

STRATEGY FOR ELIMINATION OF INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES

62

THE QUALITY OF LIFE

65

APPENDIX A - LIST OF SUB-AREA AND SPECIAL PURPOSE PLANS

69

�LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PAGE
GENERALIZED EXISTING LAND UsE

7

UrrnERUT I LI ZED AREAS

9

AREAS IN TRANSITION

RESIDENTIAL AREAS

12
7-5
30

RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT AREAS

38

COMMERCIAL AREAS

43
48
50
55
5g
63
68

NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREAS

IIIGH ACCESSIBILITY DEVELOPMENT AREAS
INDUSTRIAL AREAS
OrEN SPACE AREAS
MAJOR THOROUGHFARES
INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES

/\E STHET I CALLY DISPLEASING
FuruRE LAND UsE PLAN

INSIDE BACK COVER

I

I

�rLAtlt~ I NG DETERn I N/\N rs
IIISTORICAL DEVELOPME!Jr

Bdween lB36 and 1864, live sepat·ate conununities were e s tablished within the present
r.oq1orat.e li111its of 13ay Cily. l1 01·ts111outh and Lower Saginil\'i were platted on the east
bank of the Saginr1w !&lt;ive1· in 1836 and 1837, respectively. 13angor, Salzburg and Lake
City were platted on Lite 1-1r.st bank in 1851, 1862, and 1864, respectively.
lite econo1ny of all five co111111unities was based on the rich forest of the Saginaw Valley.
Locations along the river near the Saginaw Bay were ideal for milling and shipping
lu111ber, and the Saginaw Valley rrovided plenty of lu111ber. The Pioneer Directory of
18fi8 claimed tltat the St1ginaw tract was probably the most extensive and invaluable
in the wot ·ld. The f1irecto1·y reported that the Saginaw tract covered thousands of
acres and contained enouqh high-quality timber to provide an abundant supply for
several generations. By 1868, there were at least 32 sa~11ills operating in Bay County,
11,w; t. 1"Jithi11 the r1rrt1 1·1hicl1 is nov1 Bay City.
fhe 111ost dramr1tic grm·1th in the area which vias to beco111e Bay City occurred between 1860
and 1884 when the population increased from approximr1tely 1,600 to approximately 39,000.
Only t1-10 other citir. s i11 the United States grew at a fiisler rate during that generation.
Lu111beri11g and milling spurred many related industries. Wooden products from pails to
st1iling ships were manufactured. Iron and steel mills viere established to supply boilers
,rnd other machinery for the sa~nills. Brine from wells was used to produce salt; wood
was burned to evaporate water from the brine. Most 1,iood-related industries were located
along the banks of the Saginaw River. They occupied relatively small sites in comparison
to some 111odern industrirs, but the riverfront industrial pattern they established remains
today.
Population growth and thr. burgeoning lumber economy resulted in adjustments in local
political boundaries. !11 1857, the state legislature created Bay County out of Arenac,

�Midland, and Saginaw Counti &lt;'s . Port smouth and Lower Saginaw united under the name of
Bay City in 1857 . In 1877 , Ba nks (formerly Bangor), Wenona (formerly Lake City), and
Salzburg, united under th e na111r o f We s t Bay City. In 186 5 , the Third Street Bridge was
con s tructed across the Saginaw River . Before 1900, three other bridges spanned the river.
Bay City and West Bay Cit v forined an integrated unit v1hich was politically unifi ed as the
Ci t v of Bc1 y 1. it y i11 Flf11'.i _

. ..,
?

�•
Bay City's lu111brring crc1 v1.i -, QVet- llefore the turn of l11e ce ntury. The Saginaw Valley
c leared and atte111pl r; t_,, 111i 11 lu111her from the Upp e r Peninsula were unsuccessful.
Mi 11 operation s c l osed, ,1s did 111an y other indu s tries IJased on the lumber economy.
llmvevei-, so111e inclustri ec; r; 111viv ecl by adjusting to new conditions. During the late
lU00' s and ea1·ly 1900' s, '; liipliuildin'.], construction, and industrial equipment 111anufr1 c t11r-ing and other 11ew i11d11 s trie s 1-1ere established. Th es e new industries became
i111porti1nt co111ponr11t c; of !1,1v Cit y ' s t1-1entieth century Pc ono111y.

1-1 ,Js

r'orUU\T I ON

·111 1010, Bay City had a 11o~•ulation of over 45,000 people. Fifty years later, the
U. S. Ce ns us r 0c ord ed El ay Cit y 's lai-gest population, 53,604. Since then, Bay City has
e '&lt; per iencerl a dec l in r i11 population. The 1970 Census enumerated about 49,500 residents,
a clr cr-eilc;e o f over ~,00 0 fro111 1%0 . Census 13ureau preliminary 1980 total population for
B,i y Cit y i s 41, 59'.1, a dr~c i-eil c;e of i1l111ost 8,000 people. lhP large drop in total popula1 i1111 is p1· i111,wi l y ,1f.trili11trrl fr J "r. lii· inking" family s i ze.
1

Subtle. hut i111po r·ti1 11t c lic111 •1rs in tli r age s tructure of B,1y City's population have been
LakiWJ plt1ce durinq recr•1it: dPc ,Hl rs. The most imrortant change is the decline in the
pt-opo t-tion o f re c; ide11ts in t.l1P higlily produ c tive 30 to 49 years old age group. In 1960,
p(' r so ns 30 to 49 ye,1r s old r ep 1·r'sentccl ?.4.9 percent of tile city's population. In 1970,
they rep t·esented 20.2 pri ce 11t. Mo st of thi s decline can be attributed to outmigration.
13ay City residents 1-1ho 1;1e1·p hetv1r:en 30 and 49 years old in 1970 were between 20 and 39
yrMs old in 19611 . In 191,0, rlJ y City had 11,400 residents between 20 and 39 years old.
Tr n ycilrs l at er, 13ay City had only 10,000 residents between 30 and 49 years old. Thus,
t Ii e re wa s a 1q pe t' c e n t. cl r c I i ne i n the s i z e o f t h i s a ge g ro u p . 0 b s e r ve rs o f pop u 1a t i on
c ha11g es s inc e 1970 believe that out.migration has continurd to reduce the proportion of
rt1y City's pnpulr1tion i11 tfir, Jn t.o 4g ye,-=ir old grnup.

·,

�~~~-~~~~~-~--~~~~~~

[coNOMY
Motor vehicle manufacturing is even more important to Bay City than to the State of
Michigan as a whole. llo1-1ever, Bay City is less dependent on manufacturing activities
in generr1l than is Michigan. Michigan Employment Security Commission data for 1976
indicate that all 111anufi1cturing activities provided 30.6 percent of the jobs in Bay
County and 32.4 percent of the jobs in Michigan. Motor vehicle manufacturing provided
11 .4 percent of the jobs in Bay County, but only 10.9 percent of the jobs in Michigan.
In 1976, nonmanufacturing employment accounted for 55. l percent of the jobs in Bay
County, but only 49.4 percent of the jobs in Michigan. In 1976, Bay County had a
c:; 0111ewha t l m-ier proportion of govern111ent jobs than did M"ichi gan.
Manufactul'ing firms, including 111otor vehicle manufacturing firms, are among the largest
e111ployers in Bay City. The Bay City Chevrolet plant e111ploys over 4,000 workers. Two
flay City auto parts 111anufacturing firms employ between 150 and 500 workers. Bay City's
rrestolite Company e111ploys over 1,000 workers in electrical products manufacturing.
The Industrial Brownhoist Division of the American Hoist and Derrick Company employs
he tween 500 and l , 000 v-mrkers in Bay City.
The Michigan Employment Security Commission has projected e111ployment growth for the
State of Michigan and for Bay County between 1976 and 1985. Over a 11 employment growth
for Bay County is expected to keep fairly close pace with employment growth in the state.
Hov1ever, manufacturing e111ployment in Bay County is expected to increase at a slower rate
than manufacturing employment in the state, and motor vehicle manufacturing employment
in Bay County is expected to grow at a much slower rate than in the state. Nondurable
goods manufacturing employment in Bay County is expected to increase at a much faster
rate than in the state.
E111ploy111ent growth in Bay City beyond 1985 will depend on the ability of existing industries to expand and also on the ability of the city to attract new industry. The potenlit1l for attracting 11c1·1 industry may be reduced by anticipated declines in the automobile

4

�~~~--~~~~-~--~~~~~~
111anufacturing component of the national economy, and by the tendency for newer rapidgro1,,th industries to locate in sunbelt states. Bringing new industrial development to
Bay City will require attractive industrial sites and a vigorous marketing program. Bay
City has a number of assets which should help attract new development. Chief among these
assets are the city's relationship to the Saginaw Bay and Lake Huron, and its urban infra" true tur·e.
l&lt;EG I ON/\L SETT I NG

Bay City i s the s111alle st and 111ost northerly standard metropolitan statistical area in
t·1 icliigan. It is link r d tn the Detroit area via the I-75 Freeway. The cities of Saginaw
rJn d Flint lie between Bay City and Detroit. The 1-69 Freeway intersects near Flint and
1 inks Bay City with Lansing, Jackson, and Kalamazoo. U.S. 23 joins I-75 south of Flint
,1 11rl link s Bay City to /\nn /\rbor.
Bay City is part of an econrnnic constellation which includes the cities of Saginaw and
Midland. Saginao,.1 is the largest of the three (1976 population 84,000). Bay City ranks
se cond in size (1976 population 46,000). Midland is the smallest (1976 population 37,000).
Bay, Saginaw, and Midland counties exhibit a strong inter-relationship in their employment
und residency patterns. Michigan Employment Security Commission data for 1973 indicate
that, of the 37,265 Bay County residents who were employed, 8,032 worked outside the
co unty~ 4,937 in Saginaw County, 2,639 in Midland County, and 456 elsewhere. Of the 71,520
Saginaw County residents who were employed in 1973, 7,514 worked outside Saginaw County;
1,672 in Bay County, and tile rest elsewhere. Of the 20,034 Midland County residents
e111ployPd in 1973, 3,384 worked outside Midland County; 805 in Bay County and the rest else1-,here. The Saginaw metropolitan area is more heavily dependent on durable goods manufactur· ing, particularly transportation equipment manufacturing, than is the Bay City metropolitan area. In the Midl,rnd metropolitan area, Dow Chemical is the most important employer.
Since 1940, both Saginaw and Midland counties have grovm at a faster rate than Bay County.

5

�~~~~~~~~-----~--~~~

l1L/\NN I NG ISSUES
Ex1sTING LAND UsE
Bay City's existing land-11se pattern reflects the historic economic importance of the
Saginaw River. Almost 75 percent of the city's river frontage, exclusive of the Middleqrounds, is devoted to industrial and warehousing uses. The Bay City Central Business
llistrict is located adjacent to the Saginaw River. Many Central Business District
11roperties which front on the Saginaw River are occupied by warehousing or industrial
ll S CS.

Bily City has acquired a significant amount of public recreation space on the Saginaw
Hiver. Veterans Memorial Park and the Middlegrounds recreation area are the two largest
open-srace areas with access to the river. Wenonah Park in the Central Business District
rrnnts on the Saginav-1 Rivrr.
Bily City's residential areas extend to the southeast and the northwest of the Saginaw
llivet·. There is very little residential development directly on the Saginaw River. The
City's residential areas are traversed by business developments located in strips along
,,,a .ior thoroughfares.

6

�'

I

I

iI

....__

-z
&lt;
--z
-.
, _'

•
•
•
•
-I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

~

r.

)

' f.

'

----z
~

'

~

'

,

,. '

I

--

,

,. '
,.

_ _J

r-

r.r..

;&gt;-'.'.

, '

r-

:r

:.,

L_

':;='

.r

:,
wJ

=-

_)

-:r.

f

..,

:.,

==
~
:r.

- ·-::

.

!
I

__.

,,., =
:.. -

I !
·-~ :::: ·,

.;

?~ :....
--- -----·-- -::- -

·-

/?---..
NOIHM

=.,.,.

--=- _,--

:r.

.,

~

I

-

:...

:.,

r

f

~i

7

-

'

.,.,.

--:

r

...

f

- -,

:.,
~

. ...

,. ,

.:

�~~~~~---~~---~~~---

0vERUTILIZED AREAS

Overutilized areas result from excessive development densities which concentrate more
activity in an area than the streets and other public facilities can comfortably accommodate. The residential area south of Center Avenue is the most extensively overutilized
area in Bay City. This area contains large, old homes built on small lots. Many of the
llo111es have been converted for multiple-family use. The streets are congested and there
i s inadequate off-street parking. Many school sites in the city are overutilized because
of inadequate parking or poor accessibility. The Bay City Central High School creates
traffic congestion on Columbus Avenue and has inadequate parking. Other school sites
which generate excessive traffic on local streets include the T.L. Handy and Washington
schools. 13ay Medical Center Hospital is a major overutilized site which creates traffic
co11\Jestion on Columbus Avenue and has inadequate parking. Overutilized sites in or near
the Central Business Dist1·ict include City Hall, the County Building, the Bay City Post
Office, and the Telephone Exchange. Detailed planning to improve circulation and provide
aclditional parking in the Central Business District area was underway simultaneous with
t I1(' pr P. pen· tt t i on o f the 8c1 y Ci t y r 1a n .
liNOt RUT I LI ZED /\REAS

Und erutilized areas include vacant land which was never developed and vacant land which
lia s been cleared and is wttiting new development. Underutilized areas also include
dP.veloped land with underntilized buildings. Underutilized areas are major opportunities
to r1 cliieve desirable nevi d0velop111ent for the city.
llw city's most i111portant tmderutilized site is northwest of the James Clements Airport.
/\tone ti111e, consideration was given to developing this area with industrial facilities.
Industrial development has not been vigorously pursued because of the area's unstable
c-, oil s , potential flooding, ttnd the lack of improved streets and utilities.

8

�J,
I

~~--

i

~

~---_:
,.

!
I

I;

__ _J

I

iI

Wooos1o e ..

-

f
f

''
'

i

~---

'i

i

lI

~i

i

'P---- Center-,.---~-=--.::"'\~:

i

Il

I
I

Columbus

i

.....................

i

___ _..,,

I

if,

..-,
---..

--f -

'

&lt;
,-.

--,_,
-----'---~

.-

-

-

'

z

--

t

f

I
~.
~·L-------.
~:
-'"-- -

:

.,
-----=---

..,,...-

!

I

./

-

....-

.. ....:.

�~~~~~ - ~~~~~---~--~~

One major underutilized site is located on the Middlegrounds Island south of the Lafayette
Street Bridge. Access to this site is difficult, but its riverfront location could make
it iliglily attractive foi· the right type of development.
A substantial nu111ber of the underutilized sites are located within Bay City's established
industrial belts along the Saginaw River. Some of these underutilized sites are owned by
industries with existing facilities on adjacent sites. Others are held for future use by
11 c 11 indu str ies or hy adjc1cent industries seeking expansion room.
The future use of some underutilized sites will necessarily be determined by the established
pattern of surrounding u~es. The area bounded by the Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad, Lincoln
Street, the Penn Cenlt·al l~ailroad, and Farragut Street is such an area. About half of the
land in this area is vacant, but the distribution of existing industrial facilities makes
utilization of the vacant land for anything other than industrial purposes impractical. The
underutilized area on the west side of the city between Thomas and Fisher is in the heart
of a residential area. l~e si dential development would appear to be most appropriate for this
area. The same is true of the underutilized area south of Ionia and east of Euclid Avenue,
and the underutilized arras along the vacated railroad right-of-way between Hart and Ohio
Stn:c ts.

lllere are three rrima1·y c1reas in v1hich existing buildings are underutilized. Most of the
upper stories of Central Business District structures and of Midland Street Business District s tructures are underutilized. It is estimated that there are approximately 1,000,000
square feet of vacant space on the second floor or higher of Central Business District and
Midland Business District commercial and office structures. One major underutilized site
contains industrial buildings which have been vacant since the Defoe Shipbuilding Company
ceased operations. This site is located on the Saginaw River near the Central Business
District. Its buildings could be reoccupied by other industrial uses, or they could be
c leared to make room for new industrial or nonindustrial uses.

10

�········------AREAS IN TRANSITION
[3ay City contain s a nu111her of at·eas in which existing rleveloprnent is undergoing tran sit ion.
lhe charc1cter of strip-corn111crcial areas in the city is changing from primarily neighbod1oodor ·ientecl retail and service uses to businesses which serve a broader market area. One pilt'ticular problem has been lhe changing clientele at some bars. /\tone time, most of [3ay
City's bars functioned as neighborhood "pubs" to which most patrons walked'. Many bars now
serve a specialized clientele such as youthful "disco" groups or motorcycle clubs which are
di ~rnrtive to adjacent tir?ighborhoods.
Certain older housing arras have shown gradual improvement after a period of decline. The
Banks area located north of the Saginaw River between State Street and the Truman Parkway
is one such area which appears to be improving. Other older housing areas, particularly
t.liose located along tf1e east side of the Saginaw River have evidenced decline during recent
years. Center /\venue is lined by historic old homes, many of which were built by the leading
fa111ilies of Bay City during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Some of these homes have
been converted to 111ultiple-farnily use or nonresidential use. A few lots on Center Avenue are
11m-, occ11p i ed hy !Ja c; c; tat ions.
Cl1a11ges µlimned for tfw Central [3usiness District will result in more intensive con1111ercial
c111d office utilization c1nd a reinvigorated residential function. Changes planned for the
rlirllirnd SIYeet Bu c; ine s'~ At·e.:i i·Jill create a specialized t·estaurant and entertainment di s trict.

CoNrROVERSIAL AREAS
Many areas in Bay City have become the focus of healthy controversies over appropriate
future development and use. Such controversies are a normal part of the ongoing process
of managing land-use change. Many controversies can be resolved by the Bay City Plan.
Others \·Jill demand attention for many years to come.

11

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1111111
~ - - - - ~ , • , - - - - - - - - - Vv11oer - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

____

1

z

~

----

I

z:

l

I

__ _j

~--~
I
::

:::

-.:::

-

~

u:::,

w

~

I

C.,

~

r· -

CD

r:,

I

C•

-

I

-.::

Kosc1uszkot'

.

:::

I.......

~

-:::
'-

~

:..,J -

:: ;:
...::
::: ~ .:: :::
)... ..,:::;

·- --

-.

---~
..-.-----

"'0

I

-

-:

I
I

&gt;

:::

::.

~-_:

"'l:

;:

I

Latayette·J'L.-.Jlii'------'!'"'--•1--...ibi,,,
-0

•II
'

..,, r -

__,,;

ci5

-------

-

'.:"'-. ::.
:::

--:::

-

--:::

:::

:::

:::
:::

l

\

I

'

.I~\
i

/

\

...::::

::

\

'1
!~'\
,~

:....

-- -- -

\\

m
-~

)

-\

---

\

:-:-

::

: .

-

:::

- .:::::

.

:::.

--

\I~

'~-

-···

~

:-

'\ 0 C l ..., .

~--------✓-

::
:::.

--

-

-- -

::..:

- -::

- -~

--

�•

,.,. ....... -

--~•-

He James Clement s /\irport i s one such area. Some resid ents believe an airport should he
111a intained, but not at th e pre sent site. Others believe the airport does not benefit the
city in proportion to the cost of maintaining it and, therefore, should be phased out.
f~esidents of the city and surrounding areas who use the uirport are anxious to have the
se rvice 111aintained.
Traffic circulation proble1ns have generated high levels of controversy during recent year s .
rore111o s t among these ha s bee n the controversy over where to replace the collapsed Third
Street Bridge. Originally, Midland Street businessmen wanted the bridge rebuilt at its
old location in order to maintain traffic volumes in front of their stores. Most business111en now believe that permitting through traffic to by-pass the Midland Street Business District could strengthen i ts comme rcial potential. Many residents are concerned about the
effect of bridge traffic on the adjacent neighborhood . They would like to see a two-lane
bridge constructed. City traffic engineers calculate that four lanes are needed to carry
proje c ted traffic volume s . Federal assistance for bridg e construction may be available
ro 1· a fout' -li1ne bridg e , l;11t not for a two-lane bridge.
fher e i s widespread conc ern that regional truck traffic on Center Avenue will disrupt
uttempts to preserve it s hi s toric residential character. Presently, Center Avenue i s part
o f th e main truck route from the 1-75 Freeway to the Michigan thumb. So far, all truck
t1·a ffi c rero uting alterna t iv es considered have prov en to be very co stly.
Tr affi c congestion on lrumbull Avenue is another controversy. Heavy traffic cros s ing the
fo ur-lune Independence Bridge converges on the two-lane Trumbull Avenue, creating congestion.
l&lt;es ident s in the acljacf'n t ne ighborhood are concerned that widening could result in more
traffi c .
Strip-commerc ial development has generated controversy between property owner s , resident s ,
and planner s . Several years ago, commercial developmeht was permitted along previously
1·0s icl ential portion s of r, ,, rfield, Broadway and Kosciu s zko /\venues. Bay City planners would

13

�•

,a,a,a,a"'IIII . .

----------

no1-.i like to prevent furtlter co111111ercial development in order to preserve the quality of
adjc1cc11L residential arec1s. Proposed and recently constructed new commercial development
c1long Wilder r{oad c1ncl f11r · I id /\venue has been vigorou s ly opposed by residents of adjacent
ric i qhhm·ltoods.
lh e luture utiliz,1tion of the county fairground site has become an issue. Although the
&lt;i il e acco111111odates srecial eve nts, in addition to regular athletic usage, many observers
ilr.lievr. L11 ;1t a more inte11sive usr. would be appropriate for its in-town location. Uses
1vhich hav(' Ileen propo sed fo1· the site include a nevi hosrital, and multiple-family housing.
Such usr. s rnuld occui- in conjunction with redevelopment of the marginal industrial facilil i r•c; '.~ nu l 11 n r thr fc1 i I rp ·o1111d s ite.
Ulilizatiu11 of Veter ans MP111orial Park as a place for young adults to congregate is cons idered a p1 ·oli le111 hy man y residents. This is a problem which has occurred in many cities
i11 Micltigc1n. Some 01J ,,0rve rs believe that it is inevitable for young adults to establi s h
points t.o congregt1te. Crn11111unities ..1hich do not provide appropriate locations may find
ter11agc1·s relea si ng L11cir 1; nergies in even less desirable activities. However, residents
of the neighborhoods \/hich are disrupted by the co111ings and goings of student revellers are
justifiably co11cernrcl v1ith the rroble111. The north tip of the Middlegrounds Island ha s been
proposed for a good l oc ,1 t_ i 011 rm· students to gather because the river can provide c1 buffer
lw t1-1 r.e 11 other lc1ncl us 0c; _
I h(' a111oun t and lo ca tion 11 f neighborhood recreil ti on spilce has become an i ss ue of contrnversy
i11 ccrta in of 13ay City' s 11eighborhoods. Residents of some neighborhoods are anxious to
hov e the city develop and 111aintoin large neighborhood parks. Desirable as this objective
is, it c; o111eti111es conflicts with the equally desirable objective of developing and maintaining recreation s pace' c,t raleqically located along the Saginav1 River to serve co111mu11ity101i de needs.

14

- -

�----- -- .. - - - - - - - - - POLICIES OF

THE

PLAN

(\ CONTINUOUS RIVERFROIH OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
It is reco111111ended that Bay City rigorously follow a rol icy of development of a continuous
open-space system along the Saginaw River. The city should also continue to maintain and
improve its system of large and ,vell-distributed neighborhood park areas. Major continuous
open-space areas are prnrosed on both sides of the Saginaw River from north of the central
business district to the southern city limits. Development of these open-space areas can
be achieved through both public and private funding. Public parks and pedestrian ways can
be connected with similar open-space areas contained in private residential developments
and marinas along the riverfront. Continuity of open space along the riverfront will permit walking, jogging and bicycling along the river. The visual image of a continuous green
open-space system alonq the river will be very strong and will help to attract new residential development.

I\ I VERFRONT Hous I NG

DEVELOPMENT

The r.ay City Plan proposes extensive new housing development along the Saginaw River. The
city should follow a pol icy of gradually phasing out nonresidential uses along the river
and encouraging new residential development consisting of single-family homes, mediu111density townhouses, and higher-density apartment buildings. If all of the indicated residential development areas shown in the Bay City Plan are developed, as many as 5,500 new
residential units could be built on both sides of the Saginaw River. This new housing could
be integrally designed with riverfront marinas and recreation areas to provide a very desirable residential environinent. Such residential developments would also be in close proximity
to Downtown Bay City and 111ajor centers of employment--an important consideration in an era of
drclining energy resources. Bay City is losing its younger, middle-class population to suburba11 areas. By following this policy of extensive new riverfront housing development, the
city will attract a sizable new population to the city. If Bay City can capitalize on the
beautiful t·esidential setting of the Saginaw River, the next generation will witness a re.iuvenation of the city urnnatched by anything which has occurred in Bay City during the past
one-hundred years.

15

�.. ,.,.,.. .... - - - - - - - -----TRANSf.ORMATIO~ OF LAND ADJACENT TO THE JAMES CLEMENTS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
INTO lloUSING lJEVELOPMENT
The vaca11t land northwest of the James Clements Municipal Airport should be redeveloped
as a new planned residential neighborhood. The site contains approximately 200 acres,
111ost of which lies substantially below the Saginaw River flood plain. Use of dredging,
filling, canals, and elevated structures could render developable land for a planned
residential community consisting of multi-family and single-family structures . The new
residential development could take full advantage of its riverfront location. Canals
could provide needed drainage as well as permit recreation access to the river. Portions
or tlH! s ite could be lert in a natural open-space preserve.

ANNEXATION OF LAND FROM FRANKENLUST AND PORTSMOUTH TOWNSHIPS
In order to achieve a 111ore efficient growth pattern and to extend municipal services,
it is recomn1ended that Bay City annex portions of Frankenlust and Portsmouth township s.
ll1 e Bay City Plan recomnends annexation of approximately 2,626 acres from Frankenlust and
Po 1·ts111outh townships east and south of the city. Single-family development is propo sed
for n1ost of this area. The annexed area west of the Saginaw River could accommodate a
planned residential dev elopment si1nilar to the concept proposed for the airport site.
Hesidential development on the west side of the river could include canals, marinas,
natu1·e preserves, and other features to take full advantage of the riverfront amenity.
13ecause the portion of Portsmouth Township recommended for annexation is serviced by
railroad, there is also a possibility of development of new industrial sites within the
annexed area. The use of "tax sharing" is recommended in promoting annexation proposals.
The townships would continue to receive taxes from the annexed parcels and not have to
furni s h the full range of qovernmental services these development areas will require.

16

�.-.-

····----- - - - - CoNSERV/\TION or- Ex,srirJG NEIGHBORHOODS
Bay City should pursue a policy encouraging co111pletio11 o~ a neighborhood conservation
plan for each older neigl1borhood in the city. Neighbot·hood planning for conservation
should he done with intrnsivP, orrJanized participation of residents of er1ch neighborhond. Most of the existing housing in Bay City is old . /\pproxi111ately three-ciuarters
of Lilf' ho111cc; in flay Ci Ly v1cre built bof ore 1929, and 1110s t of those were built before
1910. Despite the age of the city's neighborhoods, housing has stayed in remarkably
good condition because of the strong ethnic groups which reside in the city's neighborhoods rind take great pride in them. The strong identity of Poles, Irish, French,
Gen11an and other ethnic groups with their neighborhoods is the real secret to maintaining these neighborhoods in a sound and viable condition over a long period of time .
The city should pursue it s pt·esently highly active neighborhood planning program. Bay
City is currently condu c ting neighborhood planning and improvement programs in the
Patter son-Belinda area, tllf' Jefferson-Lincoln area, the Midland Street area, the Columbus
/\venue area, and the South End area. Bay City's Housing Preservation Plan makes specific
rPro111111endr1tions for hou s ing consrrvation which are coordinated with the Bay City Plan.

CoMMERC I /\L DEVELOrMEIJ 1
Bay City l1as r·ecently prepared a separate Downtown Redevelopment Plan which provides for
e x ten s ive public r1nd private i111provements. This plan provides for a double-loop road
sy s te111 to i111prove traffic circulation, pedestrian-parking malls on Washington Avenue rtnd
Ce nter /\venue, a plaza at the intersection of Center Avenue and Jefferson Street, and a
1· iv e drn11t promenade and bikev,ay. Two major parking structures are also planned. :he
city s hould aggressively pursue the recommendations of tile new downtown plan. The new
1--1atr.rfront residential development proposed in this plan will need to be supported by a
viable r1nd attractive do1,mto1-1n. Bay City is one of the few central-place cities in
Michigiln whose downto1-m has not been 1-1eakened by the development of outlying shopping
mall s . The city should expeditiously carry out the needed improvements to the downtown
area to ensure that it will remain the dominant shopping area within the metropolitan
ilt ' f' ,l .
l/pvifalizc1!.io11 nf 1hr 111r1ny neighborhood busi11p c;c; distt·icts should be continued.

I7

i

�·······-----------IIIGH AccESSIBILITY DEVELOPMENT /\REAS
Tt1e city should encourage new construction within high-accessibility development areas
located along certain segments of the city's major thoroughfare network. High-accessibility
development areas are intended to provide opportunities for medium-density residential
development, commercial development, office development, and institutional development.
Such development should not occur in strip fashion but should be built on sites of a block
or more in depth. Adequate off-street parking and generous landscaping buffers should be
provided to ensure that the development is not harmful to adjacent single-family residential areas.

ELIMINATION OF INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES
The city should seek to elin1inate as many incompatible land uses as possible from its residential neighborhoods. Historically, many commercial and industrial uses have become intermi xed with the residential fabric of the city. Over the short run, it will not be possible
or desirable to eliminate all incompatible land uses from Bay City. The pattern of commercial
uses in residential areas is too firmly established to be quickly erased. The Bay City tradition of neighborhood stores and taverns can be maintained, but efforts should be made,
through detailed neigborhood planning, to lessen the undesirable impact of commercial uses
in residential areas. Incompatible industrial uses should also be eliminated from residential area s . It is not recommended that wholesale downzoning of incompatible industrial uses
be done. Downzoning should be used to prevent more intensive industrial operations from
being established in existing industrial sites in residential areas. Downzoning which makes
existing industrial facilities nonconforming should be used only to a very limited extent.
Greenbelts, buffer strips, improved off-street parking, and other approaches, should be
encouraged through zoning and detailed neighborhood-level planning in order to make incompatible industrial uses less disturbing to the residential environment.

18

�--------- :• ·- -----INDUSTRIAL RELOCATION
llistorically, industry ir1 Bay City developed along the riverfront because it provided a
source of power and transportation. This riverfront pattern was later reinforced by tt1e
location of railroad rights-of-way along the river's edge. Because of the importance of
industry to the city's tax base and employment, the city should work with industries at
their existing sites on expansion or rehabilitation projects. The city should only
attempt to relocate the industry, or redevelop the site into another use, when the
industry cannot operate profitably at the site. Several of the designated industrial
areas in the Bay City Plan have room for industrial expansion. The Bay City Plan contains five industrial areas which contain approximately 1,035 acres. There are also
~bout 100 acres in Portsmouth Township which could be ·used for industrial development.

RAILROAD CONSOLIDATION
The city should continue to push for additional railroad consolidation and right-of-way
vacation. Right-of-way which provides essential service to existing industrial developn1ent rannot be eliminated. However, the city should be sensitive to opportunities for
i·ight-of-way vacation created by phasing out of industrial uses or changes to uses not
requiring railroad service. Where right-of-way elimination cannot be accomplished, detailed neighborhood-level planning should provide for landscape buffering of railroad
right-of-way from adjacent residential uses.

SYMBOLIC ELEMENTS AND LANDMARKS
Bay City has many symbolic elen1ents which create strong visual images and give character
to the city by virtue of their location, physical appearance, and functional importance.
The city should carefully preserve and improve these symbolic elements in future years,

19

�~~~~~~~----------The Bay City City Hall is a most striking element in the city skyline. The recent
extensive renovation program carried out in this building will ensure its continued
use for many generations. Many of the city's beautifully designed churches such as
St. Stanislaus, St. Boniface, Immanuel Lutheran, and Holy Trinity, are all notable for
their symbolic importance to the neighborhoods of Bay City and should be carefully
preserved during coming years.

THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM
Thoroughfare improve,nents should be made to increase continuity in east-west and northsouth circulation on both sides of the Saginaw River. The continuity of Bay City's circulation system is deficient largely due to the historic development of the city as five
separate communities. The collapse of the Third Street Bridge is a recent event which has
reduced the continuity of Bay City's circulation system. A continuous west river thoroughfare should be developed to connect the southwest and northeast sections of the city on the
west side of the Saginaw River. Thoroughfares should be improved to upgrade north-south
circulation on the east side of the Saginaw River. A new bridge is needed north of the
downtown area to provide better east-west circulation across the Saginaw River. Existing
east-west thoroughfares on both sides of the Saginaw River should be maintained in good
condition.
Provision should be made for the elimination of regional through traffic by development of
a circumferential by-pass. Presently, many of Bay City's thoroughfares are periodically
congested with regional through traffic traveling between I-75 and the thumb area, or
using state highways which pass through the city as an alternative to I-75. Bay City
should press for the early implementation of one of the several by-pass plans now under
consideration.

20

�. ,••

aaa - -

Ill . . • • • • • • • . .

CONSERVATION OF EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION ISSUES
Bay City has one of the highest proportions of older housing of any central-place city
in Michigan. Approximately three-quarters of the homes in Bay City were built before
1929, and most of those were built before 1910. Despite this high proportion of older
housing, most of the city's neighborhoods have remained remarkably stable. According
to 1970 Census data, 66.8 percent of Bay City's households had lived in the same housing
unit for four years or more. According to 1960 Census data, 66.9 percent had been living
in tile same household for four years or more. There are very few areas in Bay City which
have any abandoned homes. llornes which are vacated because of safety violations are
rapidly demolished. During the past decade, approximately 1,000 substandard residential
units have been razed. Nev-1 suburban housing has attracted many former Bay City residents,
and many current residents aspire to live outside the city limits. However, there has
been no massive suburban flight from Bay City of the type experienced by other major
urban centers in Michigan. Many residents seeking new housing have bought vacant lots
in existing neighborhoods. The current high cost of new housing and the high interest
rates required to finance housing are encouraging many residents to improve their existing
li o111e rather than move to a new one.
Thr strong ethnic character of Bay City neighborhoods has contributed to an intense sen se
of community pride. Residents believe ethnic pride is responsible for the immaculate
co ndition of many older housing units in the city. Residents of Polish ancestry are most
numerous today, as they have been for many decades. Historically, Bay City has also been
characterized by distinct German, Irish, and French communities. The churches of Bay City
play a very important role as the focal points of ethnic and neighborhood identity. In
addition to their religious and social function, many of Bay City's churches play an
important symbolic role hy virtue of their remarkable architectural design.

21

I--

�~~~~~~~~----------Bay City's neighborhoods are not without problems. The city has not been successful
in retaining younger residents. Most of the city's highly-valued neighborhood stability is attributable to older families. Young unmarried persons, and young families
with children, often look outside the city for new housing opportunities. Suburban
locations are attractive because of their large lots, lower taxes, and desirable schools.
Because of declining enrollments, there has been a substantial decrease in the number
of elementary schools in Bay City. During the past several years, 16 elementary schools
have been closed. This has diminished the strength of the neighborhood unit in Bay City.
Some residents are concerned that Bay City schools do not have adequate financial support.
Recent school millage requests have been turned down by Bay City voters. Although the
Bay City school system does not receive as high a millage as some other urban school
systems, the overall burden of city, county and school taxes is considered high.

22

�··-----~---------Residential deterioration can be found in Bay City, n1ostly in scattered pockets of bliqht,
but also in a few areas which extend over several blocks . The reasons for such blight are
numerous and complex. Some housing deterioration may be inevitable. Bay City's high proportion of older housing units makes a certain amount of residential deterioration almost
inevitable, as does the city's high proportion of older residents with fixed incomes.
During the preparation of the Bay City Plan, community leaders representing citizens' groups,
neighborhood organizations, realtors, the financial community, and city government sat down
to discuss reasons for housing deterioration in different parts of the city. They noted
that much of the housing deterioration is associated with absentee landlords. Some said
that the ethnic pride which sets a high maintenance standard for a person's own home does
not set the same high standard for rental property. Other leaders noted that maintenance
of rental property is difficult because banks sometimes deny loans to improve rental
properties. People with low incomes find it difficult to keep their homes in good repair,
but some community leaders are disconcerted by neighbors who prefer making payments on a
recreation vehicle to 111ak i ng payments on a home improvement 1oan. Some community 1eaders
believe that banks and savings and loan institutions have red-lining policies which deny
ho111e improvement and mortgage loans in certain areas, but leaders of the city's financial
community are unanimous in asserting that this is not so. Most all agreed that tax payn1ents and heating costs have become particularly burdensome for owners of the large old
homes located in some Bc1y City neighborhoods.
Many community leaders believe there is a need for better municipal control of housing
quality. Some felt that special permits should be required for conversion of one-family
residential structures to two-family residential structures in the RM-1 Zoning District
just as in the R-1-C District. Many community leaders felt that housing units should be
inspected and brought up-to-code each time they are sold. Scattered type public housing
was seen to be generally desirable, but the recognizable design uniformity of public
housing units was believed to be stigmatizing to the neighborhoods in which they were
located. Almost all community leaders who sat down with the planners expressed the need
for the city to adopt comprehensive priorities for dealing with housing problems. They
felt that piecemeal approaches designed to distribute neighborhood improvement efforts
equally among the different areas would not be effective.

23

�··-----~~---------SPECIAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING PROGRAMS
Simultaneous with preparation of the Bay City Plan, a comprehensive city-wide analysis
of housing conditions was commenced. The study was initiated to obtain information
needed to set housing and neighborhood revitalization priorities. It is the first such
comprehensive analysis of city-wide housing conditions since the Bay City Community
Renewal Program was completed in early 1972. Since 1972, the Community Renewal Program
has been the basis for detailed planning of very specific neighborhood improvements in
carefully delineated areas. Neighborhood plans which have been completed to date have
been incorporated in the Buy City Plan and summarized below:
1.

Patterson-Belinda Redevelopment Plan: This plan covered the area north
of Woodside Avenue between Crotty Street and Trumbull Avenue, and the
area north of the Saginaw River and east of Sophia. Clearance of substandard housing lo make way for industrial expansion was coordinated
1tlith construction of the new approachways to the Independence Bridge.

2.

Jefferson-Lincoln Redevelopment Plan: This plan focuses on the area
bounded by Jefferson Street, First Street, Lincoln Street, and Fourth
Street. The plan provides for redevelopment and major rehabilitation
activities in th e area between Madison and Lincoln. The plan provided
for clearance of a three-block site for a 158-unit elderly high rise.
A 10-acre park is partly developed. Three blocks of new, private
townhouse development are incorporated in the plan. Extensive funds
are avc1iluble fnr housing rehabilitation.

3.

North Henry Street rlan: This plan focuses on the area bounded by
North Henry Street, Union Street, Wenona Avenue and Hart Street.
The plan propo se s vacation of a portion of Catherine Street and an
existing railroad right-of-way. Provision is made for new residential development, park area, a greenbelt, and a bicycle path network,
and retention of neighborhood commercial development along North
Henry Street. Imp 1ementat ion of this p1an has been combined with
efforts to irnplP.111ent the Midland Street Plan.

24

�-- &lt;
--- ----- &lt;._,.
--- -zz
--...

L'"":

"-

if,

,_'

-'--------------wi1oer - - - -...

'

,l

,

,..,.,

2

r ..,

-=
-~

2

..:.,
.......

....
=
:..,

=

/' LJ__.,...-,.___
-

--.-.....,.,,. Lafavet1e

-

;._

I

.:.

=
"J.

-==

-=

::

:.,

J.

I

I

I

N

l'°:

L--~---,
r- __ __J
r------'
I
I

\
I

.... "-JI

~

~

;._

_,

�--

-

-

-

11111 . . -

-

-

-

-

II.

Midland Street Area Plan: This plan focuses on the historic
Midland Street Business District and surrounding residential
development. It addresses the need for a new thoroughfare
alignment in co11junction with the replacement of the Third
Street Bridge. !he chief residential recommendations include
extensive redev r lopment for multiple-family housing and the
pre ser vation of other residential areas through rehabilitation.

5.

South End Arca Plah: A revitalization planning program has
been started in this area. The area is bounded by 27th Street,
Jennison Avenue, Cass Avenue and the Saginaw River. The plan
points to ce 1·ta in critic al actions that should be taken such as:
/,;

6.

Strengthen the single-family residential environment
1•1i th relv11Ji l i tat ion and code enforcement programs

*

Acquire and develop land for direct riverfront access
i1nd reci·ci1tinnal use

*

Work toviards a concentration of commercial land uses
along 13roi1dway Avenue

*

llezo ne lt1 11d for ne1-1 residential development

Columbus Avenue Area Plan: A revitalization planning program is
being carried out in the area bounded by 10th Street, Ridge Road,
18th Street and the Saginaw River. The Land Use and Circulation
Concept Plan has been planned to a significant extent to maintain
the essence of Columbus Avenue so that when it is totally revitalized it will still be readily recognized as a familiar experience
and image by tl1r. people who regularly use it.

26

-

-

-

..

�W1W1W1 W1W1 • 1

-J

WI

- I - I - I. , - I - •1-

r~EW HOUS I r~G DEVELOPMENT
The Bay City Plan proposes extensive new housing developn~nt within the existing corporate
li111its of the city and within portions of Portsmouth and Frankenlust Townships proposed
for annexation to the city. New single-fa111ily and multi-family development is proposed
within the city's present corporate limits. Single-family development is proposed for
the portions of Portsmouth Township suggested for annexation. Single-family and multifamily development is propoc:;ed for the portion of Frankenlust Township proposed for
annexation.
New residential developn1ent will be needed to accommodate the growing number of households
which will wish to live close to n1ajor employment and shopping opportunities. Residential
locations within Bay City can offer convenience to jobs and services and an established
infrastructure of public utilities will minimize the "bite" of increasing transportation
and housing costs. If Bay City can capitalize on these assets, the next generation will
witness a rejuvenation of the city unmatched by anything which has occurred in Bay City
during the past one-hundr-ed years. The potential for new housing development in Bay City
can be strengthened by e111ploy111ent growth. However, extensive new residential development
is not dependent on the creation of large numbers of new jobs. The increased desirability
of in-town residential locations should be enough to sustain major new development over
the next twenty-five yer1rs.

RIVERFRONT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE JAMES CLEMENTS AIRPORT AREA
New residential development on the site north of the Ja111es Clements Airport is a good
illustration of a dramatic new land-use proposal of the Bay City Plan. The area contains
approxi111ately 200 acres, most of which 1 ies substantially below the Saginaw River flood
plain. Use of dredging, filling, canals, and elevated structures could render up to
145 acres developable for a planned residential community consisting of multi-family and
single-family structures. At an average density of ten units per acre, 1,450 families
could be housed in the a1·er1. The proposed new development should take full advantage of

27

~

�1W1_ 1_ 1_ 1

- I- I- I-I-I. ,. ,. , -1•1-I

its riverfront location. Canals could provide needed drainage as well os permit
recreation access to the river. A portion of the area could be left in a natural
open-space preserve. Multistory residential structures could be oriented to view s
along the river. A mixture of housing-unit types could provide residences for
families, young adults, and senior citizens. With proper design and marketing, tl1&lt;
area could become the most desirable residential community in the Bay City metro politan area.
Marketing of quality residential development on this site would be enhanced hy
deve 1op111en t of a 1oca 1 access road which could connect with the Veterans Memori a 1
llighway at the extreme north and south ends of the airport site. Such a local access
road would enable residents and visitors to by-pass existing industrial develop~er,t
located on the east side of the Veterans Memorial Parkway. If the city annexes this
industrial area, steps should be taken to require future industrial development t.,&gt;
prnvide a substantial landscape buffer along the highway. Such a buffer :; hould include
il high berm and dense rvergreen planting.
Thi s site is one of the most promising locations for major new residential development
in Bay City. This location on the Saginaw River provides a potential for exploiting
natural amenities which can help guarantee successful development. It is large enough
to take advantage of economies of scale. The value of existing investments on the site
is low in comparison with the value of investments on other riverfront location s in the
city. The site is presently owned in part by the city, but municipal ownership is not
required for successful residential development. Indeed, it is intended that the area
be primarily developed and marketed through the private market. The desired quality of
development could be achieved through appropriate zoning regulation.
To help prepare this site for residential development, the City should encourag e its
des ignation as a fill site for river dredgings. It is recognized that environ111entalists
will oppose the filling of this site. The city will have to argue that thi s site is
one of the few remaining sites in the city that can be developed for needed ho11 s ing
Mld that the city is p1·e" e1·ving other "natural" sites along the river.

28

�•

___
___
_
-••1111••-,

RIVERFRONT RESIDEHflAL DEVELOPMENT IN T•IE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
fhr Bay City Plnn incorporates riverfront residential development proposals set forth
in the Bay City Downtown Rrdevelopment Plan, a separate, recently completed plan.
Adaptive reuse of exi st ing structures for residential purposes is proposed for the
Mea north of Wenonah Park. This area is presently occ upied by industrial, warehousing, and retail facilities. Much of the existing floor space in this area is
vacant. Adaptive residential reuse could be accomplished in steps over a period
of sr.veral years. Howe ver, successful marketing may require substantial improvements
over the entire area to ueate an attractive, unified residential environment. The
a1·ei1 enjoys an attra c tive view of the Saginaw River and the Veterans Memorial Park.
lhe proposed Saginaw River B1·idge can be an asset to this view if properly designed.
lhe scrapyard located 011 the wr s t side of the river north of Midland Street should
he removed.

RIVERFRONT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT AND THE AIRPORT AREA
The Bay City Plan proposes riverfront residential development on the east side of the
Sagi naw River between Ninth Street and Forty-First Street, on the Middlegrounds, and
the west side of the river beb·1een Crump Avenue and Ivy Avenue. High-density multifamily residential development is proposed for the east and west side of the Saginaw
River where clearance of ex isting industrial and residential developments would be
required. Medium-density 111ultifamily residential development is proposed for vacant
portions of the Middleground s. In all, these areas contain approximately 180 acres
for high-density 111ultif c1 111ily residential development, ilnd 36 acres for medium-density
111ultifa111ily residential development. Approximately 70 acres currently utilized for
industrial, warehousing, and commercial functions 1vould be cleared; appoximately 70
acres currently utilized for residential development would be cleared. The balance
of the area is undeveloped or in public rights-of-way. At average densities of ten
units per acre for medium-density development and 15 units per acre for high-density
development, 3,000 ne1v residential units could be constructed.

;,ig

�I
I
f

I
I
I
I
I
I

:..

:::

.,. _

I
_ _J

:.,

=

&lt;

--z.
-----

:..

L
:

-1
I

]

]

...

r

.l

IJ

..,
:II

=)

,

:..

=

-::
!

..,:::

'V

'f

:::

'f.

:::

'

"f

:.,

, '

=

f

:.,

:.,

:..

rJ',

'.'

:..

,...__

J,

ODIi

.....

.•••
.:
I

.

I

I-

L.

-J •.
i

:

LL-H··
\
i
,

l

:

::

~ - ;..,_...:::
-

_,,.

....::
::

..:: -:::

--

\'

I
I

•

l

'••
I

••
•

1

..••
.•.•
..
.
..

::

-

.- ~

·..::..

- - --..::._ - ::
:: ::

::

::.:

...::
;....

:: ::

·-

-- ....::

---

--::

::
.._

::

:: ::
:: ::

-

I

I

............ ····--····

:--

::
·::

'----

I

I
I
l

::::::

.__ ~ -·.-.::....:

..::._

:::::

-

...::,

:....

--

CJ

::

:-=::::--........

~

...:....-::::

::

�W '• W

~

WI 1111 •

•

•

•

•

•

,.

•

,.

l&lt;cdevrlopment for high-de11sity i·esidential use along the Sc.1gina1v River should be a lonqrange policy of the city, not a short-range objective. It 1vill not be economically
fe,1sible or desirable to force the relocation of viablr industrial concerns which wish
to remain on the Saginav, River. However, it should be possible for the city to pursue
long-range redevelopment strategies which can take advantage of periodic private market
decisions to relocate from existing facilities. Such a strategy is outlined in the
~cc tio11 of the Bay City l'lan entitled "Riverfront Redevelopment Strategy."
r1IDLAND NEIGHBHORHOOD HJGH-DENSITY MULTIFAMJLY RESIDENTJAL DEVELOPMENT

New high-density multifa111ily residential development is proposed in the Midland Street
neighborhood. /\ subc;tantial portion of this high-density residential development lies
adjacent to Veterans Memorial Park. One high-rise r11ultifamily residential structure has
alr·eady been constructed in the area. High-density multifamily residential development
i s particularly arprorriate for the area. Residents will be close to the Midland Street
Busine c;s District and tl1e Central Business District. A substantial portion of the area
er1joys attractive views c.1cross Veterans Memorial Park and other proposed riverfront opens pace areas. Apartments constructed along Vermont Street and the proposed West River
,1rtf!t·ial s treet could b0 designed to minimize the effects of anticipated heavy traffic
volumes. Parking areas can be located between residential structures and arterial streets.
Sides of buildings could face arterial streets. Screeninq walls and landscape huffers can
,1lso hr. constructed r1ln11ri arterial streets.
/\rmEXA TI ON OF RE s I DE rn I AL DEVELOPMENT AREAS

lhe Bay City Plan provides for annexation of upproxi111at e ly 2,626 acres from Portsmouth and
1-t·a nkenlust Township s east and south of the city. Sin&lt;Jle-family residential development is
proposrd for most of this area. The annexed area west of the Saginaw River could accoITT110rL:it.0 ,1 planned residenti ,11 development. High-density multifamily residential develorment,

31

-

�• ------ - - - - - - 111ediu111-density multifa111il y residential development, and single-family residential development could all occur in a mixture which provides residential units for families, senior
c itizen s , and young adults. Residential development on the west side of the river could
i11clude canals, nature preserves, and other features to take full advantage of the riverfront
a111enity. Convenient s hopping to serve residents of th e area could also be included.
r1oBILE lloME PARI&lt; RE S IDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

There ar e two mobile home park communities located within the present corporate limits of
Bay City. One is located in the industrial area between Broadway and the Chesapeake and
Ohio Railroad right-of-way . There is limited potential for expansion of this mobile home
ar ea be cause it i s cornpletely surrounded by exi s ting development. The second mobile home
park community is lo cat ed ea st of Euclid Avenue between Niagara and Hotchkiss Streets. ,
Thi s co111111unity could be expanded across the Grand Trunk Western Railroad right-of-way.
Such ex pan s ion was plann ed by the original developer of the mobile home park. Expan sion
co uld help meet any additional need for mobile home sites within the city, and it would
pro vid e an opportunity for re s idential access to the Saginaw River. Proposed anne xation
of the are a ea st of the Jan1es Clements Airport would bring an additional existing mobile
home community within tli P. corpor a te limit s of Bay City and provide land for expan s ion.

32

�····------ ....
RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
THE MAGNIFICENCE OF THE SAGINAW RIVER
The Saginaw River, becausr' of its dramatic width and its improving water quality, is
certainly Bay City's most important natural asset. This asset should be capitalized
upon to bring new upwardly mobile people into Bay City. Over the next tv-1enty-five
years, extensive new residential development could occur adjacent to the Saginaw
River. Such residential development could be designed in an integrated way with
riverfront marinas and pat·ks to create a residential lifestyle which is attractive
to people from throughout the metropolitan area.

IIISlORICAL RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
The bold new riverfront redevelopment strategy proposed by the Bay City Plan requires
changing a land-use pattern which is older than Bay City itself. Industrial use of
the riverfront has ct1aracterized the Bay City area since the communities of Portsmouth
and Lower Saginaw were platted on the east bank of the Saginaw River in 1836 and 1837.
lhe Saginaw River was an essential avenue for industry and commerce from these very
early days. By the peak of the lumbering boom, the Saginaw River carried a level of
traffic analogous to the 111ost heavily used modern thoroughfare. In July of 1868,
recorded river traffic passing the Third Street Bridge included 326 steamers, 1,694
tugs, 442 sailing vessels, and 217 barges. All of the area's major lumbering and
related industries were located along the river, or very close to it.
The river was, however, a less than perfect avenue for transportation. In the winter,
traffic came to a standstill. After the Civil War, the railroad become the preferred
means of moving natural resources from the hinterland to major urban centers. The
first railroad service to Bay City came in 1867 with the completion of a Bay CitySaginaw line. Subsequent railroad development brought Bay City in touch with more

33

�-----------ex tensive 111a1·kets for its lumber, fish, and salt products. The city was eventually
served by the Grand T,·unk Western, Pere Marquette, Chesapeake and Ohio, Penn Central,
and Detroit and Ma ckina c Sys tem s. Numerous railroad spurs were cut through residenliJl area c; on both side s of the river. Industrial facilities were no longer dependent upon riverfront lo ca ti ons ; th ey sprang up along railroad line s throughout the
a r ea now vJithin the Bay Cit y corporate limit s . Hov1ever, industrial utilization
o f the riverfront continued because rail road 1 i nes were stretched out to serve
ex i s ting concern s along the river and the lines generat ed new indu s trial development
011 vacant riverfront land and as replacements for older facilities which closed down.
Thu c;, th e 01·iginal ri ve di-ont industrial development pattern became self-perpetuating.

34

�··•--11111• - - - - - - RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPi1ENT STRATEGY

Change in industrial occupancy is a natural pheno111ena in the long-range economic cycle.
S0111e industrial fin11s close their doo1·s , others find ne1-1 locations for expanded or more
111odern facilities. During recent years, Bay City has see n the closing of the Defoe
Shipbuilding Company, an important local industrial concern since near the turn of the
century. There has been s peculation that other riverfront industrial establishments
111ight close or relocate. Over the years, many riverfront industrial properties have
c l1anr;rd fro111 one ind11 str ial uc;e to another.
It is within the purview of Bay City to manage the proce ss of industrial change to
achieve a new land-use pattern, a land-use pattern which opens more of the riverfront
to people-oriented residential and recreational uses. Achieving such a land-us e
pattern will take a long ti111e. Thirty years may be required to shift the usage of
ex ten sive portions of the riverfront frorn industrial to residential or recreational
uses. The city will hav e to adopt a patient and sensitive management approach in
order to achieve the de s ir ed land-use change. Key ele111ents of the approach are as
fo 11 Ov/&lt;;:
l.

The city will l1ave to maintain close communication with established
industrial fin11s along the riverfront. The city should keep abreast
of the needs and plans of riverfront industrial firms to the maximum
c x tent po c; s i h 1r~.

2.

The city should not expect to pressure riverfront industrial concerns to relocate. However, whenever locational decisions are to
be made, the ci ty should be prepared to present viable relocation
options which are attractive to riverfront industries and the city
itself. The city should be prepared with locational alternatives
whe.never a fin11 co nsiders a major investment in its present site.

1rl

�.,
------ - - - - - Making available viahle relocation options requires available
industrial siles of a variety of sizes within the city limits.
During recent ycilr'S, several Michigan cities have been able to
achieve cJra111cJtic land-use changes by developing industrial
parks to provide a relocation resource for older industries.
At the same li111e, 111any major Michigan cities have lost existing
industries because appropriate new sites were not available
when crucial n~lociltion decisions were made.
3.

£3ay City must hf, prepared to acquire existing industrial
properties and l1old them over an extended period. This will
be necessary to assemble areas large enough for attractive
riverfront residential development. Properties may be
acciuired and lr,ased until the appropriate time for redevelop111e11t. In thi s v1ay, holding costs can be reduced. If previous
occupants r e lo ca t e 1\lithin the city, there need be no tax base
l OS t .

4.

The sensitive u·; e of downzoning may be necessary in order to
avoid major ne1-1 1·i vedront industrial reinvestment that could
best be captured elsewhere in the city. Major new riverfront
industrial invest111ent will increase the cost or at least delay
the ti111etable few the transition to residential use.

5.

Bay City 111ay wish to utilize its Economic Development Corporation to oversee and manage the long-range relocation of
existing indust,·y to new industrial locations within the city.
The process can be coordinated with efforts to attract new
industry from outside Bay City . Property management could be
assigned to an existing or new municipal department, or private
property 111anaqr;111ent firms could be used.

36

�•111• - .. - - - - - - - - - - -6.

I lie urban re11e1·1i11 appi-oach used by Bay Cit y to c1chi eve 1and-u se
changes in t'10 l'r1tterson-Belinda area will have very limited
applicability 011 thr riverfront. The approach is costly and the
federal gra11t 111oney needed to underwrite it is unavailable in
sufficient quc1ntities. Under the urban ren ewal approach, the
city must acquii·e pi-operty, by condemnation if necessary, relocate busines c;cs r1nd residents, de111olish structures, and sell the
property foi · rww development. The market va 1ue for riverfront
property zo11ed for residential developlllent 1-iill be a fraction of
the total urban rene1vi1l cost. Federally 111andated relocation
pay111ents to i·0s idents and businesses which are forced to move
are among the 111o s t expensive ingredients of the urban renewal
approach. Ba y City will avoid these relocation costs by allowing relocation to take place at the initiative of individual
indu s trial cnncrrnc; over a more gradual, longer time period.

r1tlf~l&lt;ET VALUE ANALY S I S

The 111arket value of vacant lc1nd suitable for high-density riverfront residential
develop111ent could exceed the market value of that land for present industrial and
re s id ential uses. Lc1nd along the east side of the Saginaw River which has been proposed for riverfront residential development includes both industrial and residential
uses with a total as sr.ssed value of approximately $2,500,000. Its market value should
be between $5,000,flOO and $5,500,000. This represents a market value of approximately
$25,000 per acre.
If the land were rezoned for high - density mult ifami 1y resident i a 1
development, it could hiJV e a market value of between $6,000 and $10,000 per permitted
i·es idential unit. With residential densities of 15 units per acre, the land would

37

�',

!

-

........ .·

I

z

--.
----, -'

I
I
I
I
I
II

C.

;....,_'
, .-

~.,,,.,

r-

z

L_
,1c1 mt&gt;.it

[
.!

C
0

•

-0
0

:I

r

..
.

.r

)

----.,...
.....

----.-....
r •'

::,

'J
--'.'.'.'.
,. '

5.

C:

0

0

0

(.)

C

I
i

.... ~--··ca,~· ··········· ······

\,,

·., _____ _

\\

\

-=-···········- -------

-------·

::

I

•

�,_ ......

- - - - - - - ...

l1avc a market value of $G5,000 or 111ore rer acre. Of cou1 ·se, redevelop111ent costs 1vill
be higher than the cunenl 111cJrket value of the land even if relocation costs are
avoided. Co s ts for de111ol it ion of existing structures and site prepJration will be
c; ull s tcJntial. Many existing streets will have to be vacaled and their pilvements rirped
up. New public i111prove111ents will be needed in the area. Management of properties
during the interim between acquisition and resale could be a deficit-producing operation, at least in some cc1 c; es .
l{/\IUW/\D (ONSOLID/\TIOIJ

t·1cJny of the r·iverfront al ·"as proposed for residential redevelopment are served by
e x i s ling l'ailroad line c; . S11cccs s ful residential redevelop111ent of these areas cannol occur 1vith freight Cilt·s l'Unning through them. Carefully planned railroad consolidation will be nece s saty in order to preserve essential services to industries
viliich will re111ain along tlte riverfront over the long run c1nd to eliminate railroad
I im"'· in future residenti .- 11 redevelopment areas.
JAMES CLEMENTS AIRPORT

lite Jt1111es Cle111ents Airport should be 111aintained as a Basic Utility II type of airport. lllis class of airport should have no detrimental effect on the proposed
,tdj,1crnt riverfront houc;inq.

lfJ

�-------- - - - - COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENl
REGIONAL lRADE AREA
[3uy City is the 111ost not ·Lhr.rly 111ajor metropolitan area in Michigan. For this reason,
tlte tradr arer1 for Ba_y City's comparison retail establish111ents extends well into the
counties wlticli lie to lit e north along the Saginaw Bay and inland. Bay City retailers
can expect to Ci.lpture i.ln i111portant part of the retail expenditures of residents of
Arenac, Gladwin, Iosco, r1ge111aw, Roscommon and Clare counties. The cities of Midland
t111d Sariina1--1 compete v1itl1 fl.:iy City for a share of regional comparison retail trade

10

�- ------ - - - - - - - -ex penditures, but Bay Cit y's location puts it at an advantage in capturing the expenditu1·es of residents living to the north. Midland and Saginaw retailers enjoy a locational
aclv,1ntt1ge over Ray City in capturing comparison retail expenditures of persons living to
L11 e so uth . Bay City' s Central Business District is a major regional commercial center.
!he Midland Street Bu s in ess Di s trict and the Columbus /\v enue Business District also have
ex t ensive a111ounts of co111p,1rison retail space which help s attract shoppers from throughout
tl1e region. Major retail attractions located just outside of Bay City include the K-Mart
a11d other st ores located on [uclid Avenue, and the Hampton Square Mall located east of
the city. M,1jor c1ttrr1 ct. i1111 &lt;; r1t lla111pton Square Mall include a K-Mart store and a Wiechmann' s
•; f. nn~.

RAY CITY RETAIL STRUC!URE
/\ I though s hoppinq facilil .ies an' sca ttered throughout Bay City, most retail development

li es withi11 nine general a1·eas . Three of Bay City's nine retail areas contain primarily
crn11pari so n retail 11ses. r11e se three are the Central Business District, the Midland Street
l3us ine ss District, a11d tl1e Co lu111bu s Avenue Business District. The Central Business Di s trict
co 11tc1in c; the large s t concentration of commercial activity in the city. The 406,000 square
fee t of retr1il sp ac e in U1 c Ce ntral Business District i s over half of th e 714,000 square
fr.et in th e city as a 1-1hole. The Central Bu s iness District is pri111arily a comparison
1·e tail ce nt e r; 277,000 squa1 ·e f ee t of C.B.D. retail square footage is devoted to compari so n
U'~es and only 29,000 squan feet is devoted to convenience uses. The Midland Street
13u c; ines s Di s trict, locr1t cu across the river from the Central Business District, functions
as iJ seco nd "downtown" for Bay City. It contains 64,000 square feet of retail floor area,
117,000 c; quare feet of co111parison area, and 17,000 square feet of convenience area. There
i s 111ore t·etail floor· area alonq Columbus /\venue than ~n the Midland Street Busines s Di s trict.
llov1eve r, the retail floo1 · area alonq Columbus Avenue is intermixed with other uses so that
it i s not as concentrated as in the Midland Street Business District. In all, there is
93,0 00 square feet of retail floor area along Colun1bus /\venue; 73,000 square feet is compariso n retail and 20,000 sq uat ·e feet is convenience retail.
1

/JI

�,.,.,..-..11111 ...

...
--- ------

f\ay City's six 1·e111ain111q retail ar·eas contain a 111i x tul'f:' or COi11pal'iso11 il11d convenience
retail establish111rnts. lliey also contain a nu111ber of personal service use s such as
barbe1· and beauty shops, laundry and dry-cleaning establishments, repair· shops, und
other si111ilar uses 1vhicll c11·e co111plementary to convenience retail establishments .
l~etail concent1·ations c,1n !Jr~ found on Marquette Street in the Banks area, on Johnson
St1·eet between 1-ioodside and Fifth Streets, on Kosciuszko Avenue, on Lafayette Avenue,
on Salzburg Avenue, and on Broadway south of 28th Street. Substantial commercial
develop111ent probably would have also occurred on Euclid Avenue if it had not been for
the resistance of adjacent residential property owne1·s; most of Euclid Avenue connnercial
development occurs in Bangor Tm&lt;1nship and in Monitor fownship. Wilder Road has recently
been zoned commercial, c:J11d nevJ stores are starting to be located adjacent to this
1·ccr ntly v1idened highwav.
CErHR/\L

Bus I rff ss

DI s 11 ~ 1r:T

fluy (ity hris a strnng Centi-al Business District v1hicli hri s historically captured r1 very
hi(Jh proportion of 1·ela il expenditures. In 1972, the 111ost recent year for which Census
of Business data is avail.1ble, Boy City's Central Bu s ine ss District captured amost onrhalf of all Bay City 1·etail expenditures and almost one-quarter of all Bay County
1·ctail expenditures . Belvn'e11 1967 and 1972, the propo1tio11 of cily c:rnd county 1·ctoil
expcndit11res captu1·ed by the Central Business District declined only sliqhtly. Du1· inq
Lile sa111e ti111e pe1· iod, tl1e central business districts of 111a11y other 111ajo1· cities in
Michigan lost mu c h 11101 ·e g1 ·ound to outlying comretitors. l01· exa111ple, in 1972, Saginaw's
Central Business Dist1·ict capttwed 9.9 percent of Saginilvl Standard Metropolitan Statislicr1l Area retail expendit11res, down frorn 13.7 percent i11 1967. In 1972, the Central
Business Di s trict of Ann /\rl&gt;or captured 8.3 percent of /\nn Arbor Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Area retail ex11enditures, dovm frorn 15.0 percent in 1967. In 1972, the
Kalamazoo Central Busine ss District captured only 4.6 percent of f~alarnazoo Standard
Metrnrolitr1n Str1tisticc1l /\n,a retail expenditures, dnl'ln f1·0111 17.2 percent in 1967.

112

Ill

�I

I

_J

-

..

~

if.

&lt;
,. '

'-

--&lt;

.

,y

l

:..
'-

-&lt;
---

I
Ce"t•r T--------,.--

rL_

':.,

:.,

_-,

..,:..,-=':., :.,

'-

:..

f .'

--

'-

,y

:..

'-

:.,
-' -'

J

-

I a~

-~

~

'.._;

)

..
.

...
..
..
.
.

I
I

C

C
0
0

0

"
C

.r.

-~

..J

2

.
.i--••
------··..
•

•·······

.

::

. ----···..

•

'
Coll••~••••

ea••

:

- ....--

.......

.

.. ---· b---········;···
. -- ......
:

:

..

.

...,

;....

..

-

::~ ......
::

~

,;

~

::

~

- ·:,.

..__

-

;._

::

- --

' .
. ..... -........

--

:- ::

--

- --.::...

'

..,/

.....

..,/

'...)

L_l

''-

:..

:..

-...

�•

,..,.~1WI,.. __ _

..
--- ------

The decl i11e in the proportion of retail expenditures captured by central business
districts is attributable to the growth of outlying shopping centers. The Bay City
area has experienced sucl1 growth, but it has not made the dramatic inroads on Central
Business District market share experienced in other cities. Hampton Square Mall and
the com111ercial establish111ents on Euclid Avenue outside of Bay City will continue to
compete effecti vel y with th e Bay City Central Business District for local and regional
s hopping dollars. However, it is believed unlikely that there is sufficient market
i11 the Bay City area to support a new comparison shopping center of substantial size.
lhus, the Bay City Central Business District and other comparison shopping areas have
qood potential for steady grnwth, and there is little possibility that they will be
undermined all at once by a major new competitor. The opening of the proposed
\,Jp110n ,1 h rad: rlaza crnnplc&gt;x 1·1ill further strengthen the Central Business District.

RAY CITY DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
ril e Downtown Redevelop111ent Plan, a separate plan which was adopted in 1979, provides

foi · a double loop road svste111 to improve traffic circulation in the Central Business
llistrict and to link thr Ce ntral Business District with the Midland Street Busine ss
11i s ti ·i c t. 1he Downto1v11 f~e development Plan incorporates major shopper amenities
i11 c ludi11g skywalks, pede str ian-parking malls on Washington Avenue and Center Avenue,
i1 plaza at the inters ect. ion of Center Avenue and Jefferson Street, and a riverfront
prn111enade and bikeway. Major parking structures are planned. A mixed-use complex-the ~Jenonah Park Plaza--is proposed for the old Wenonah Hotel site. Landscaped
111eclians are proposed for W,1s hi11gton Avenue outside of the commercial core. These
i111proveme nts would enhance the econo111ic vitality of Bay City's Central Business
!J i '.;trict. The Downtown RP.develorrn1ent Plan designates sites for major new private
inv estment including t·eta il and office facilities. A conference center and hotel
,11 ·0 prnpo sed so uth of \·/P n&lt;rnah rark.

44

�1,a

,.,.,. _____ _

----------

STRIP-COMMERCIAL AREAS

Outside of tile Central P.usiness District and the Midland Street 13usiness District,
13c1y City has no areas \~hore co111111ercial development is dense enough to allov1 shoppers
to easily patronize seve1·,1l stores with one stop. There are no areas in which a
full 1·ange of convenience retail and service facilities (supermarket, drugstore,
hilnk, c leaners, and barbershop) can be found within easy reach of each other. The
city's strip-co111111ercic1l areas contain a mixture of corrnnercial, residential, industrial
ond other uses. So111e off-street parking can be found, but usually in locations where
it ser ves 011ly one or two adjacent stores. The Johnson Street and Colu111bus Avenue
str ip-co1111nercial areas contain the highest concentration of commercial development
outside of the Central 13usiness District and the Midland Street Business District.
lhe stores in these area s are, in general, better maintained and apparently more
cn111petitive than many of the stores in some of the city's other strip-commercial areas.
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMEflr flLMl

H e Bay City Plan provides fo1· an intensification of commercial development in the
Central 13usiness District and in the Midland Street Business District. Intensification
of commercial develop111ent in selected portions of major thoroughfares is also included
in the plan. However, t.he total area of thoroughfare commercial development is between
Seco nd St1 ·eet and Fifth /\ venue, on Kosciuszko between Jackson and Farragut, and on
Lafayette Avenue betwee n Garfield Avenue and Water Street. The plan establishes the
policy of encouraging tile neighborhood shopping function of these commercial areas.
fhoroughfare commercial develop111ent is also provided for along Columbus Avenue between
Sc1ginc1w Stre et and Mclellan Avenue. The Bay City Plan incorporates planning objective s
for this area set forth in the Columbus Avenue Plan, a se parate recently-completed
ne ighborho od plan. Thoroughfare commercial develop111ent is provided for along Saginaw
&lt;:;trcf't nnd \.-Jashinqton /\v0nur so uth of the Central 13usine ss District.

45

�~

~,.,..,.,..~--

..
...
- - - ·- - - - -

Develop111ent of a 11iajo1· co111111ercial area on Euclid /\venue between Fi s her and Ionia
Streets i s proposed. Thi s area contains 30 acres v1hich could acconunodate a comme rc ial park similar in concrpt to an industrial park. Such a development will require
r1 lo cal access road off L11clid Avenue.
Individual parcel s could accommodate co111111erc ial establishment s which r0quire independent structures, and which would normally be
located in s trip- con1111p1-c i,1 I r11·0a s . A convenience shopping area could be part of th e
con ce pt.
l11r• [3 ;1y f'. ity Pl an ol r; o dr;', i(J11 ,1 t. es high-acce ss il&gt;ilit 'Y.' dev elop111ent c1rea s along key c;0 cJ111ent c. of 111ajor t:hol'Ou ghl c1 1&lt;'S . lhe se high - acces s ibility development areas can acco111111O&lt;L1l&lt;' co111111c1-cic1l as 1~cll ,1'., otl1c1· use s . lligh-acces s iliilily corridor s arc c1ll or pi!rt. s
o f : Wilder Road, Eu c l irJ /\ve nue, Saginaw Street, Ko sciu s zko /\venu e , Broadv1ay Avenue,
Sc1 l zbu1·g /\v r nu P, Lo filyP tf. P /\ve nu e , ll enry Street, Marqu e tt e /\venu e and Wenona Av enu e .
r rn vision is mad e for fring e-co111111e rcial develop111ent in th e area beh1een Woodside Av enu e
c1nd ,ii- s t Street i111rnedi a Le ly east of the Central 8usine ss District. Fringe-connnercial
use s includ e those v1hi ch ,w e 11ot appropriate in a centr ul business district or neighborl1o od shopping area, 01· do not provide direct service to the motoring public. Typic a l
f r ing e-co111mercial use s in c lude auto111obile and other motor vehicle sale s and ser vice
e stabli s hments, 111ecliu111 - !.o large- s ize printing establi s h111cnt s , lumberyard s , r1nd foocl
s t or age 1ocke r s .
fh e B,1y Cit y Plan de li11 e,1tes a s pecial Center /\venue pr ese rvation corridor extending
a l ong Center /\v enu e fron1 Madi son Avenue to Lincoln Avenue. The Center Avenue prese rvation corridor i s int end ed to pr e serve the histori c chara c ter of Cente r Avenue. Th e
pre servati on corridor con c~ pt can be implemented by zoning regulations which permit
office and a limited range of commercial uses to occupy th e historic homes on Cente r
/\v enue. Very strict design standards and site plan revi ew procedures should be
utilized t o preserve tf1 ri f1i s toric architecture and urban a111bience of th e area .

46

�1,..,.. .... .,. .. ... -

..
..
.
..
------

l!IGH-/\CCESSIBILITY DFVELOPMENT AREAS
The Br1y C:ity rlan r eco111111e11ds high-accessibility develop111ent areas along certain seg111ents of the city's 111ajor thoroughfare network. High-ac cessibility development areas
are intended to provide opportunities for 111edium-density residential development, co111111ercial development, office develop111ent, and institutional development. It is not
intended that such develop111ent should occur in a strip fashion with rows of multifamil y
housing, shops, and offices sc attered next to major thoroughfares. Development should
occur on sites of a bl ock or more in depth. Adequate parking and landscaping should be
provided to ensure the dev e lop111ent is not harmful to adjacent single-family residential
areas. High-accessibility development areas are delineated along Wilder Road and Euclid
Avenue. Residential, co111111r:&gt;rcial, and office development along these thoroughfares could
occur on vacant land 1-1hicli has never previously been developed. High-accessibility
clevelopment areas are c1lso proposed along segments of the proposed We s t River Drive
(Henry Street and Marriuette Street), Saginaw Street, Broadviay Avenue, Salzburg Avenue,
Lafayette Avenue, and Kosciuszko /\venue. New multi-family residential, commercial, and
office development in these areas could occur through the clearance of existing obsolete
and substandard structures. Piecemeal conversion of existing residential structures to
111ultiple-family or nonre s idential use should not be permitted. New development in these
areas should be provided with adequate parking and landscape buffering to protect existing
s ingle-family develop111r,11L v1ithin adjacent neighborhood s .

47

�I .✓ --

I

-=--=-~::.....,-\.\I
;k----·
.-%~~\,'
_//% "v
c

r.:.

,,, -::

- -~·

--·--'.'.'._

..,/.

-z

-~ H•-

.

_.. r/ ,.r

=
-.... --- --

: : .... ·7•cr

__ j.......
__ ;&gt;J\
••

·• ••••• : :

I

~' .-

L

_.../ \

1.. !I

~ ~

7

•• Ii

/ r,. .__-;-

'•

Cf; ,. if,,

I

.

f.

;...,

'

r- .

;.r. ,

• , . I .. . ~ - - - - - - . - - - : \ ·

Ir

I

I

'--

-- -...,.

,:•

/

.. ,
-··
::

--

I

':
'
'
'

;,._

.:

-

·-.s?·?

...;_

::

..

;

\

.'

.,

.I

___.,,.

)

l

\'

-.

.:

\

I

.:

.:

S::

)

'

:::

.::. ._

.:.

.:

::

·-

.:

I

'--==-----.
~' \ . .•

;..

-

.... . . . . ....

-- -.:~;-

-- --:-,- --

;..

.... -···

::

::-

-:.
: :•.-_

. . . .... --·- . . . . . . . . ...

--

~

---- ... ···-· ·-··

..::._

✓

&gt;

::

::

-- --.- ---::,--.

::
::

�. ., ._

~,-.

.. ... ... -- ... -

,_

....

~

~

....

....

r....

-

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENf
l'UTURE

} NDUSTR I /\L

r,rrn\•/ rH

It is anticipated that future industrial growth in Bay City will come primarily through
the expan s ion of exi s ting industries. Transportation equipment manufacturing and food
and other nondurabl e goods 111anufacturing are expected to be prime growth areas. Transportation equipment 111an11facturing industries require very large sites with good highway
and rail access. Water ilccess is sometimes necessary for the large volume of bulk
s hipping. Bay City do1? s not have enough vacant industrial acreage within any one area

49

-

-

�I
I
I
I
I
!
I

-~------------- w

•o• ' --- , -----

....-

r--- - -

!

I

--

I

p

'

1....

i

'

~

L

I
'

tI

I

11'

.,_ .,,,.,

I

-:----------~~

L

rI

I

I
I
I
I

I

.,,
'
....
I

'

~-

~
l

\

~

''

...

I

.!

\\
'\

\

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - · "~&gt;U&amp;11'C--

&gt;

'

_;

r

•-

::

...:.

::..
:--

..:.

- -- -

..:
••••••••--••••••••••••• l,O!'• ••-•••••••••••• ..

::

·-

:..

::

::.

------

I U I • • • • • • • • • • • - • • • ................ - •

--

::.

---- ---

:..

/ ,

·····•· ··-·········~·- ~ ······-··-············ .................. .

�~ : ..._ ........ ..,._ ...... ._I

...
,
_
_,
-I
:

,

~

~

~

I

....

,

-- - -

to offer good potential for thr~ r!stc1hlish111e11t of i1 111ajnr 11e\'1 ti·ansportation equip111ent
111a11ufact11ring facility. t·lost. grn1-1th is likPly to collie U1rouqh the expansion of the
existinq Chevrolet pl;i11t ,rnd it &lt;; r.urpliers. Clearance 1·11lich resulted fro111 the rc1tterso11Be l i nd a UI ba n Rc II r, vi r1 1 I' rn .kc t. p I o v i dc s a d d it i on a 1 a er· f' il ~If' vi it h i n c 1o s e p rn x i ni it y to the
CIH'Holct plc1nt. Mon' i11dust1 ic1l are,1 close to tl1r Cllevrnlet rlant could be provided
by the redevelopment of 1-r,111aini11g industrial areas located north of Woodside Avenue.
niJ11dura1Jles 111anufacturi11g ofhet tl1r1n food includes pri111a1-ily the manufacturing of consumer
goods in s111all plant.s. /\ny nf 13c1y City's several indu:-;trial areas with good highway
,1 ccr.ss ,11·c q1itr1hlP fr,r · 111r1d nr1nr1111·r1hlr rinorls 111,1n11L1rt111inq rstr1blish111rnts.

IIISfORIC/\L lrmusrnJ/\1

flEVEIOPMHIT r/\TTERN /\ND tXISTING lNDUSTRIJ\L AREAS

r,s noted ea1 -l irr, tile c i Lv ' s e :: isl i11q i11dustrial develop111ent pattern predates the incorporation of 8ay Cit y J r, c1 unilir.d 111ut1icipality. Hivpt·front sites becallle the pri111e
industric1l locations i11 tlH' citv during the era of lu111her 111ills, vJOoden products
111c1nufacturing. and c;t1lt 111i11i11q. llie gi·eat majority of the city's existing industriill
ilCt 'Ci1CJe is in sitPs 1-11lirl1 f1ont on the Sr1ginaw niver. Mr1n_y such sites are long &lt;1nd
n&lt;1no1-1; they v1rre irlec1l fn1 · s,31•n11ills and lu111ber storage, but they are not particularly
suitable for modern in,lii c; t1 -ii1l 1ila11ts. Hiql111ay accr.ssibility is through two-lane residentir1l streets. This dcvr lop111e11t pattern does not fulfill the needs of modern industrial estc1hlish111ents 1-1hicl1 prefer rxposure to the motoring public for advertising
rur·poses. !he strip of i11dust.rial developrnent lying betv1een Lafayette /\venue and Fortyfir·s L Sti·eel contains tire 11c1nov1r.st and most roorly-r1ccessed industrial sites in the city.
vii tl1 t.he exceptio11 of i1 fr'"' recently-developrd sitPs ne ,1 r rorty-first Street, most of the
st.rip contai11s very lov1 inl.rnsity ind11strial uses. The l3ily City Plan rroposes long-range
pliasinq out. or tt1i c. i11d11 r, f:1 iul area. In the sltort-ranqe, the city should v1ork with these
industries t.o keep thr111 r 11 1hr t1x roll ;:111d to prntect. jobs. When changes in the economy,
tr.cllnology, 01· vc1lues ocrut · that \viltTant lite industry to find a new location, the city
should ilssi s t in rrlnc ,11 i11q th0 i11d11st.1-y in the cif:y ancl in redevelopinq the old site
into housinq.
1

1

r; I

�·····-l·-l-···••11
r·urURE lNDUSTRI/\L DEVELOPMENT /\REAS

!lie Bay City Plan incorpo1· ,1tc&gt;s five industrial areas v1ithin the existing city li111it ,;,
a11d one indu s trial arra in a portion of Portsmouth Tow11sllip proposed for annexation
to the city. In al 1, inclt1st1·ial areas within the city contain approxi111ately 1,035
r1ues. lhc Pm·ts111outl1 l o1·111 s hip industrial area contai11s 98 acres.
The largest industrial area in the city lies between Woodside Avenue and the Saginc1v1

River. Thi s area contains the Bay City Chevrolet plant and several other major
industries. fhere is e :'. tensive vacant land, a portion of v1hich was created by the
Piltterson-Belinda Ut ·ban l!e newal Project. However, much of the vacant land in the
district is ovmed by inclu '.; tt ·ir::s already located there, and, therefore, it is probabl y
not avililable for new ind11strial concerns. Vacant ind11strial structures are locat ed
,i t the for111er site of U1c Defoe Shipbuilding Company. Existing industrial uses in
the di s trict 111ake very l i111ited use of the river frontage. lhe Chevrolet plant uses
thr river for cooling p1111 1 oc;ps and the municipal se\vagc treatment plant utilizes it
,7'-, il rr' cc iviniJ st t' Pillli.
l he seco nd largest i nclu s txi al ai ·ea i ncoq,ora ted in the Br1 y City Pl an is 1oca ted in
the extre111e 1101'tl1ea sl. co rnet · of the city above Marquett e Avenue and east of the
Tr11111c1n l' arh1ay. Thr un:,1 pt·Psently contains petroleu111 and aggregate s torage fa ci liti s
;is v-1rll ,1s 111anufact:uri11g plants. It is the one major industrial area in the city wlii t,
does not have so111e sitrs f1-onting on the Saginav1 River. With the exception of the
st r·ee ts 1•tltich border the di s trict, it contains very little public right-of-way. Tl1is
lock of public 1-iqht -o f - v1,1v could be an advantage \-Jhen ilssembling sites for lan1e-s ca le
clr'V(' 1011111r. n t.
During recent years, U1e 111ost intensive industrial use of the riverfront has been 111ilde
by industries located hr.:t1·1een Marquette Avenue and the Sa ginaw River. The Bay City Plan
1,1·ovi des fot· retnininq ind11 s txinl use of the Marquett e industrial area. It contains

52

�!· l· l·I-]- - - _:_1_. 1. 1W1
approxi111ately 133 aues, 111ost of which are fully developed. The largest industrial
concern in this ai·ea specializes in aggregate shipping and storage. The area also
contains a 111arina and tugboat facility. Because the area combines rail and riverfront access, it is suitable for river-oriented storage uses. Topography should
111ake it relatively easy to screen the Marquette industrial area from adjacent
residential areas. A gi-,1in elevator should be built along this stretch of riverrt ·on t.
rhe industrial area locatrd between Salzburg Avenue and Niagara Street on the west
s ide of the Saginaw River contains approximately 107 acres, almost one-third of
v1hich remains undeveloped. The undeveloped portion lies to the west of the railroad right-of-way 1&gt;1hich cuts through the area parallel to the river. The largest
industric1l facility in the area is the Prestolite plant, but there are several
otl1er i111portc1nt manuracturing es tablishments located there also. Highway access
to the Salzburg industrial ai·ea is better than for any other industrial area within
the city limits. The futurP. industrial potential of the area could be strengthened
ir one or t~vo large parcel s could be asse111bled from existing vacant acreage.
fhe industrial district located on the east side of the Saginaw River between Ninth
Street ilnd Eighteenth Street contains approximately 74 acres. American Hoist and
lkl'l'ick Co111pany, one of thP city's largest employers, is located near the northern
end of this district. ror this reason, and because of the other important industrial
uses here, the district is not proposed for phasing out in favor of riverfront residential redevelopment. The area is a viable industrial district because sites here
arr sub s tantially deeper than in the riverfront industrial district on the east side
or the river between L,1fi1vrtte Avenue and Forty-first Street.

S3

�---••---···
OPEN SPACE
lhe open-space pattern i11dicc.1ted in the Bay City Plan includes extensive riverfront
acreage as well as larr1e and well-distributed neighborhood park areas. Major riverfro11t open-space areas include the Veterans Memorial Park and the river frontage to
the north of the park. Riverfront acreage to the north of the park includes industrial land which must be c.1 cquired for the Hoodside-Vennont Bridge approachway. This
land is presently utiliz ed for salvage yard operations. North of the salvage yards
on the riverfront lies a vacant area protected from development because of its
c1rchneological signifir.anr:r. It contains extensive Indian relics.
A 1 inea1' riverfront op en-s pace area is proposed from the south end of Veterans Memorial
Park to Niagara Street. Much of this area is natural wetland which functions as an
important wildlife habitat area. Public acquisition of a portion of this area could
be accomplished with fu11ds from state and federal open-space acquisition programs.
The linear open-space ar·ea between Salzburg Avenue and Niagara Street need not involve
public acquisition. llov1r ver, a greenbelt screen should be developed to screen indust rinl uses from propo se d Middlegrounds open-space and residential areas.
Two important riverfronl open-space areas are indicated in the Central Bu s iness District.
Wenonah Park provides a major civic riverfront area v1hich will be abutted by new commercial, office, entertaininent, and convention facilities. To the north of Wenonah Park
1 ies a propo sed residential area which will include a pedestrian promenade along the
riv erfront. A landscaped open-space area is also provided for at the approachway to
the Veterans Me111orial Bridge. Major riverfront open-space areas are proposed for the
Middlegrounds. The Midd .legrounds contains a commercial marina which is complementary
to the extensive publi c 1Tueation area proposed.

54

�•
•
•
•
•.I
•
•
•
•,1
'

I

'i

~-

-

·-: ',)~:.:

--&lt;
,_,

.~
_..I ,.-~:c
.,

-

,.,0001,oe-

r.'

:::

;~~-4;\

'

.~., .

--

\\\:
.._______ ~ante,•---------•J

.....i...,___

~=.

J."'"'"'

,.

'

•

r- '

-

1,... mOIJI
J . •_

)

L

.. :

r

d

.r::.

E
:,

l
::

C

C:
C
C&gt;
J J--Yr1 ~

0

'-

::

&lt;.)

C:

;..

• r-l!"'~, ~
~

.,,

~-

r.

C:

:::.

:::.

- ....::.- - ... ·::

:: ....:::

'-.:

=:.J. ..::._ - -

I

~

:;•••••• ••••

.

I

~.::t_·\ ·~ - \\.
,.., __,,-{

r-""'l

.;r,;J !~
{ .. 1.·:.r-1

\

I

. -{"-/}I I

rr::..~ · .. .

•-:-rr·
,",:&lt;-,•"•J
C '•\•I

1

-~,
.;.c
f
&gt;.J-,;.;,.,.~-

\

\

\
.

•, \_

\

1 •• '

.

1 ~~

.

;..

-'-

'

- -----

' " - ..... - ' • • • • • ~-1· . . . ~ _ .... ., • •

L.........1...........--•

·\_

\,

I _,,·._,:,-'~·-:1 ·, , ,, .

;..

'
\

f:-!~--\

i ·,

••••••

\\.

·-. l.;:(~1 •.)&lt;\
t'."-

......

I

~rJ-- -c ~
'••
•

- -- -- .._
--

::
.'

·····-·····~-·

·~ :

'

, :~ /

•

•••• Cosr ··:·

.

,·

,.-,•, &lt;.'
_._,.,. ·--

-- . ·
..... .. . . -

',
••

' :.. ••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••·

:-1'
.

... , ,,. .,

j
I

:: ~
__

-:::

- :::::

..::
::

::
:::_,

........

::

":"

-...::.

�····--····
A linear open-space area is proposed for the east bank of the Saginaw River south from
Lafayette Avenue to Fo,·ty-first Street. This linear open-space area could be incorporated as an integral part of riverfront residential development. The open-space
c1 creag e could be count Pd in determining permitted residential densities. However, a
public ec1sP.111ent should li e acquired to permit pedestrian and bicycle circulation.
An extensive open-space ar P.a is indicated between the river and the residential developproposed for the area north of the James Clements Airport site. Because of the
l o~v elevation of this ai·ea. approximately half of the area must be reserved as open
s pace. A large portion o f this open space should be included as part of the planned
re"idential develorment. Public open sp ace for active and passive recreation use should
hr rr"ei·ved a t the nortli r rn po,·t ion of the present airport site near Forty-first Street.

111c11t

5G

�...............
TIIOROU(;Hr-/\RE SYSTEM
\IEsr

SIDE CrRCUL/\Tiuri

West side Bay City is 111;1dr. 11p of the previously separat e communities of Bunks, Wenonu,
and Salzbut·g, and there ,ire poor 111ajor road connections between them. No through route
exists along the western edge of the Saginaw River to allow traffic to move directly
between southwest and norlheast portions of the city. In order to provide better west
c; icle circu1ation, the 13ily City Plan recommends realign111ent of existing streets and cons 1xuction of conn0cto1 ·s be~1-1een them to create a continuous west river route. The
route proposed in the plar1 uses Marquette, Henry, and Wenona Streets as the main ele111ents in the proro sed west 1·iver route . The final alignment of the route may be refined throuqh mor e detr1ilrd planning. Major east-west circulation on the west side of
the Saginaw River will he acco111111odated on the thoroughfares which connect the proposed
Saginaw l~iver 13ridge, the Veterans Memorial Bridge, and the Lafayette Bridge. It is
proposed that Midland and Ven11ont Streets form a major thoroughfare leading to the
\-Joodside-V e r111ont 13ridge. The Jenny-Thomas one-way courle will function as a major
thoroughfare leading to the Veterans Memorial Bridge. Salzburg 1-iill function as a
major thoroughfare leading to the Lafayette Bridge. Wilder Road and Euclid Avenue will
provide east-west and 11ni·t11-south circulation at the northern and western boundaries of
t:hr city, 1·ec;pectivrly.
1-_ /\ S r

SI DE

C 1 ~CUL/\ r I ori

rive 111ajor east-v-1est thornughfares are proposed for the east side of the Saginaw River.
The '; e ar e : \,Jood s ide Ave nue, Center Avenue, Columbus /\venue, Lafayette-Ko sc iuszko,
a nd Cass /\venue. rou1· 111a .ior north-south circulation routes are proposed. The most
important of these is tlw route formed by the Veterans Memorial Highway, Broadway,
Garfield, and Wa s hington /\venues. This route will link the proposed riverfront residential area and the Central 13usiness District. It will also carry traffic approaching
thr city frrn11 the south illonq the Veterans Memorial Higf1v1ay. Trumbull /\venue is the

57

�II

"•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

-~--------------~

oo -

\

-- -

!

·

--~

if:
,_

I

"'.'.'._

---

I

r-

...

f

L

~

r •
._,

~ &gt; 1 ; 00 01 10 • -

•

--....
-~---.-.

7I

.
..\:

..,.,_,...,~'
l l'lomo•

I

: a~ta,..,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _....,__

l

::o"

I

C
()

.....

.

i

I

f

C,·

:,

I
I
I

f

0-

"C

'61

I

I

C:

0

't::

.!:

!.
"C
C

~

0

---

·-, _

,...__

-~

C

.)'

.'
''

'
''
'

.
C

}
"C

...

~

::

..

....

C"
0

C:
L

-

c

C
L

C

I

-

I

r
I

!
i

....~

'I

I

:,

········ .......... ~---·
I

(.,01• --~••••••••••••.,

-

--- -

--:: "--- --:

~
,i

i•l (
,•rr
,&gt;

\ __ 1~

.......-'!-

" 1\-.

------•a&gt;••·········-············~- ·

-. -

.

'I

I ' '

t! /; \

~

~ --,

\•• ~

,

-

-

__·-~

·····•· --·-·········""·-~······-··-··············

__

. . . 1 ...

_:..

~

J.

.::::.
_,

�•

.

~

·

w

second most i111portant north-south thoroughfare on the east side of the river. It
connects with Independe11ce Bridge on the north and with M-15 near Columbus Avenue.
!\ new nortl1-south thorou9hfilt'e connection is proposed hetween the Veterans Memorial
llighway at McGraw /\venue and Lafayette Avenue. This thoroughfare will provide
Jccess to proposed new rr,sidential development along the riverfront. McGraw Avenue
could eventually prnvide a 111ajor thoroughfare linkage through proposed irnnexation
il\'f'rlS &lt;;ntlth of the p1·rs r 11t city limits.
1

I, mouG11 I RAFF I c:

S, 10R r-R/\NGE SoLUT r oNs

Bay City is traversed by four state highways: M-13, M-15, M-25 and M-84. It also
lies adjacent to I-75 and 11S-10. M-25 is a major truck route between 1-75 and the
thur11b area. M-15 and M-1 3 have been popular with motorists as alternatives to the
heavily-used 1-75. Thei1 popularity increased with the opening of the Independence
llrid\Je. lhrough traffic prnble111s are particularly sevet'e on summer weekends. Most
of the proble11rs associatccJ with through traffic involve the channeling of heavy
volu111es into tl'm-lane strerts, and long backups at intersections or behind cars
111aking left turns. Sho1 ·L-range solutions include widening of affected streets and
adding turn lanes at certain intersections. Proposals for widening the Lafayette
nriclgr or constructing " 11ev1 bridge at Cass Avenue have also been considered.
f11ROLJGH TR/\FFIC:

Lor1G-R/\MGE SOLUTIONS

Develop111ent of a continuous circumferential by-pass will be the most effective approach
tor eliminating through L1-affic from Bay City. Such a by-pass could utilize 1-75 on
the west side and Wilder Road on the north. Pine Road (which extends through Ports111outh and Ha111pton Townships and Essexville) could be the eastern segment of such a
circu111ferential route. Wi Ider Road could be extended and a new bridge could be con,;tx uctrrf to connect \~i lrJc,1· to Pine Road. !\ less expensive alternative would be to

59

�•• •••••
utilize the Independence l3ridge which could be connected to Pine Road via Woodside Avenue.
Sevet·a 1 proposals have b1'en considered for the south seg111ent of the proposed by-pass. One
proposal is to construct a Cass Avenue bridge to link Cass and Hotchkiss. A second alternative is to link 1-75 t.o McGraw Avenue via a new thorouqhfare located between Hotchkiss
and Sto11e Island Road. McGraw Avenue, Bullock Road, and German Road, could form the south
segment of the circu111fr1·(•11tial route. Pine Road would have to be extended south of Cass
to German Rnad.
-1111 rrn

STR EE T

BRIDGE

l~E r LACEMENT

The collop se of the Thit ·d S!Tert Bridge in 1976 has caused major traffic problems for Bay
City. Tile Third Street Hridge v✓ as one of only two bridges serving the Central Business
District area and one of only four bridges serving the entire metropolitan community. It
carried over 20 percent of the daily river crossings in the city. Veterans Memorial Bridge,
1vhich is part of the M- 25 route, has had to accommodate a very high proportion of the displaced traffic. Henry, Wl' nona, Thomas and Jenny Streets have experienced serious traffic
congestion as a result of refunneling of traffic to the Veterans Memorial Bridge. East
side sti-eets 111o s t seriously affected are Center /\venue, Madison Avenue Water Street,
Saginaw Street, Hashington /\venue, McKinley Avenue and Seventh Street. Circulation difficulties associated 1-1ith the collapse of the bridge have created particular problems for
Bay City's t1-10 main bu:-;i11ess districts. The extra traffic using the Veterans Memorial
Bridge has increased traffic congestion downtown. Midland Street businessmen were originally
concerned that the loss of traffic would result in reduced business. However some observers
believe the area is recuverinq from the initial shock of redistributed traffic patterns and
that it will eventually benefit from the elimination of through traffic. Traffic congestion
is most serious during peak Central Business District traffic times and when bridges are
opened to accommodate shipr:iing and pleasure-boating traffic. Numerous traffic improvements
designed to better the flow of traffic through the congested areas at the ends of the Veterans
Me111orial 8ridge have br:e11 i111ple1nented or considered. The most important of these i111prove111ents
i c; thP co11stxuction ol ,1 110v1 lwidqe to link Woodside Avenue viith Vermont.

60

�···-····
I NDE r'ENDE t'lCE Bl&lt; I OGE /\I' r'RO/\CHW/\ Y S
1111: new Independence 8rid!Je v1as opened in July 1976 shortly after the collapse of the
lhird Street Bridge. lhe Independence Bridge project wa c; a joint city and county
rffort. Lhat included a111! itiouc; 1·edevelopment of the orea aro1md the bridge. IndepenclPn ce [fridge is able t.o cr1rry 111uch 111ore traffic than the old Belinda Bridge. However,
llir' increr1sed traffic ha s cauc;cd serious problems at both approaches to the bridge.
fo n'ciUCP. tr,1ffic congr,,:;t.ion, \-Jildrr Road was widened t.o five lanes from the bridge's
north end to M- 13. It is 11roposed to upgrade Trumbull /\venue between the bridge and
M-15. Tr ,1 ffic proble111 s 011 lt'u111bull are particularly severe on weekends when the
s ti ·eet is clogged by thi ·ough traffic seeking an alternate route to 1-75. In the short1·a11gc, intersection i111111 ·&lt;1v 0111c11tc; need to be made; in the long-range, the street needs
tn !iP 1-1iclr:t1ed.
1

Cr:tJTl&lt;/\1_ DU S INESS D1 s 1P1cr (JRCUL/\TION

8il y 1: it y 's Cent1·,1l Bu s in es s District has experienced many traffic problems. Circulation i s hampered hy on-sln~et parking, inadequate off-street parking facilities,
inadequ ,1 te s treet arrang c111Pnts, traffic signalization problems, and a mixture of
thrnugli and local traffic. fhe Bay City Downtown Redevelopment Plan contains a
douhl e lnop concept de s ig1tf'd to improve circulation in the Central Business District
unc..l link it with the Midl&lt;111d St.reet Business District. On the north, the C.B.D.
loop will consist of Tltircl and rourth Streets. On the south and east, the C.B.D.
10011 will cnnsist of Saqinr1w Street, the McKinley-Seventh Street one-way couple,
ond Madison /\venue. Qt.h e r improvements needed in the downtown area include the upgrading of traffic signal r, , the construction of parking ramps, a new downtown bridge,
,ind t.iir' 1·rrntit.ing of M-? r; to by - pass the d01·mtown area.

Gl

�........... ,.
srR/\lEGY roR ELIMIN/\1 l(lM OF UICOMPAl IBLE LAMD !!SES
L'uring lhc past clcc:ad1•, 1:,1y Lily has 111ade substantial prng1ess in e·li111inc1ling incrnnpatible land uses. llii s hiJ •; been acco111plished in conjunction with detailed neighborhoodlevel planning under the llr·bun Renewal Program and the Con1111unity Development Program.
1\-10 areas where r1·ogre&lt;; r: l1a·~ be0n most dramatic are the Patterson-Belinda area, and the
,leffrrson-Lincoln arra. In the Patterson-Belinda area, extensive substandard residential develop111ent was clra1ed lo 111ake room for industrial expansion. The entire project
was coo1·di11ated with constrnction of the Independence Bridge and related thoroughfare
i111prove111ents. 111 the J1:I fr!rson-Lincoln area, deteriorated housing and conunercial uses
were clea1·ed for a pa1k, iJ senior citizens high rise apartment, multi-family townhouses
and a law enforcement center. The City's first housinq rehabilitation program was
•; t,,1 ded i 11 tl1i s 11r&gt; i rJlihn1 l11J od.
Ove1· the s hort run, it v1i ll not be possible nor desfrable to eli111inate all incompatible
land uses fron1 flay City. Ille pattern of commercial uses in residential areas is too
fir111ly estali li s l1 ed to li e 1 p1ickly erased. The Bay City tradition of neighborhood ston";
011d ta ve rn s can be 111,1 i11t.Ji11c,1, but efforts should be 111ade to lessen the undesirable
i111pact of co111111e1cial uses i11 residential areas. Oecisions about \&lt;Jhich co111111ercial usf' s
Lo retain a11d hov1 to 111akr• them better neighbors lo resid ential develop111ent should be
111ade at the neiqhborhood plc1nn ing level. Effort s sho11ld be made to eli111inate incompat ililr indu s trial uses f10111 1esidential areas, but such efforts should not be heavy-handed.
Ille 8,1y City Plan doe s nut 1·eco1rnnend wholesale downzoning of incompatible industrial
uses. Do1&lt;Jnzoning should be use d to prevent more intensive industrial operations fro111
being established in existing industrial sites in residential areas. Downzoning which
n1akes existing indu s t1 · ial fc1cilities nonconforming should be used only to a very li111ited
extent. (~reenbelts, buff(!l' strips, additional off-street parking, and other approaches,
should be encouraged thrnugh zoning and detailed neighborhood-level planning in order to
111ake inco111patible inrlt1 s t1 · i.:il uses less disturbing to the residential environment in 1-1hich
tliry c11 -0 lo cc1te d.

62

�\

------------Wilder-Ra-------------\

i

r-~

i

11,!

Ill

.:

•

11;

'

-

i
J

--~

'J

:r

_,
__,_ _ Wood11oe -

~'

~

z

---'
-

I
I

II

....

.....-

J.

:r

-&lt;
-- -""

;

.:::.
:;

,T'

.I

:r
:r

7

&lt;'

-

'J

·,

~

DIV
-- ---

::.

-

-::-

- ::

.,,. ..__ --- ------ --:-- ~-:;
- .:: --:. ---

--:

::: ...:::
- ----- ·-·.. .: ·-:::.~. : : ·- ~ 1- -; .......~ .i- ';
~ ...:::
....._
._ ...

i

I

~

\

""'::

-

.._..::....

.,,.

-

-

-- ---

--- --

�........ --- During recent years, 13ay City has made substantial progress in consolidating railroad
lin es and eliminating unn eces sary rights-of-way. The city should continue to push
for additional consolidation and right-of-way vacation, where possible. Right-of-way
1-1hich provides essential senice to existing industrial development cannot be eliminated.
ll • 1·1ev er , tile city should he sensitive to opportunities for right-of-way vacation created
by phasing out of certain indu s trial uses or changes from uses requiring railroad service
to uses not requiring railroad service. vlhere right-of-v1ay elimination cannot be accomplished, detailed neigl1bor·hood-level planning should provide for landscape buffering of
rililroad rightc;-of-way frn111 adjacent residential uses. The homes fronting on Carroll
f&lt;oad are among th e nice st and be st maintained in the city despite the fact that a railroad riqht-of-way arch es along their back property lines. Deep lots and dense landc; ci1p inq llavP help ed to 111i11i111ize the impact of train trilffic.

64

�• .I.I.I• • .,

11, W , .• )

rIIE

OU/\L I ry OF LI rE

Hr:s10Ern1/\L VITALIT Y

llli s flay City Pliln is forn1ulated in the belief that the city must be a good place to
live, as t•1ell as a good pl ace to 111ake a living. The strength of the city i s pri111arily
dependent upon its reside11tial vitality. It must be attractive to families with growing
c hildren as well as to young unmarried people and older people. Planning for schools,
parks, s hopping, neighborhood institutions, police and fire protection, cultural activities, and enviro11111ental c l Pcrnliness, should all be geared to strengthening residential
vi t.;:i 1 i ty.
P.ay r.ity 1·es idents place i1 p1·emiu111 on neighborhood social ties. ror this reason, Bay
City may be one of the fe\-1 ce ntral-place cities in the Midwest in which existing urban
neiq hborf1oods are prefPtT ed ove1· newer suburbs by a large proportion of the population.
Bc1y City has many fine neighborhoods with attractive and desirable homes. Certain older
r11·eas in Bay City have been rejuvenated primarily throuqh property-owner efforts. Other
11r'iql1hnl"11oorls have hennfitrrl fro111 carefully coordinated rubl ic revitalization.
llo1-1ever, l3ay City ha s a very g1·eat need to create new ne ighborhoods which can attract
1·cs id r nt s seeki ng new hou s ing. There are presently no unutilized area s within the city
v1hich cc1 n acco111111odate 111ajor new residential development. Provision of new neighborhoodsca l e residential dev c lor111ent can be accomplished only through annexation of adjacent
tJ11dPve lnp ed areas .a nd tl1rnuqh redevelopment of areas presently devoted to other use s.

65

�·····••11
ErtVIHONMENTf\L 0Uf\ll I Y

lllc s trength of 13ay Cil.y clr' pends in part on the perception s of the people v-1ho live,
work, rl.nd vi s it the c it y. !he City's environmental quality and vigor must be readil y
sr. en. Entran ces to th ~ c ity should be distinctive. The Central Business District,
the City Il a fl area, Veterr1n s Memorial Park, the Middlegrounds, and the entire riv e r front should convey th e i1 importance through a strong and attractive visual impact.
/\pprna c hways to the c it y it self and to its major activity centers should be distinctivP.
Special efforts should be 111ade to upgrade landmarks and symbolic elements of the civic
0nviron111 1: nt. /\e s thcti cc1\ l y- unattractive uses should be cleaned up or restricted.

/\r' PH 0/\ CI IW/\ YS
/\prirn ach1-1ays a1·e i111p ort c1 11t. hecau se they provide the fir s t image of Bay City to r e sident s
and e111pl oyees rel.urning lrn111 out s ide the city and to vi s itors. Important approachway
point s ar e lo cated alonu 111,1 jor arterial streets which lead into the city. Approachways
a l so occ ur at the entr crn cr. to major activity centers within the city. Bridges over th e
&lt;::; aq in c1 v1 l~i vr 1· ,Jl' r. i111p u1·L,11it apprnacl1v1a ys to either sid r. of the c ity .
\li e po le n l. i a f 101· c1ea ti11 ~1 c1 pos itive psychological i111pact at i111pol'tant apprnachwa y poin ts
s hould be lllax i111iz ed t hro ugl1 spe c ial efforts to impro ve surrounding development s , en s ur e
a ttr ac tiv e vi ew of di s lo11t develop111ent, and create a d1·amatic impact through new devel op111 ent. One approt1 cl1v1a y v1hi ch has undergone significant improvement during recent year s i s
th e Veteran s Me111orial Bridg e ar ea. Improvements in the area which have helped create a
po s itiv e psy chological i111r ac t are the Sears and Holida y Inn structures, Veteran s Memorial
Pa rk, a nd the Pine To1•1e1 ·s high rise apartment building. Public right-of-way landscaping
on tl 1e ea s t s ide o f tl1 e b1·idg e has also enhanced thi s approachway. The renovation of
Cit y Hall add s t o t he overci ll environmental quality. The environmental quality of th e
app1·oa c hwa y can lie furtl ir ,1· s trengthened by the elimin a tion of unattractiv e and inappro priate l and J ses suc h as th e ce111ent indu s try located be hind City Hall and the auto r epair
estu bli s h111011t l oca t ed al l.inn and ,Jenny. Ba y City s hou ld encour age e s t abli s hment of more
,it t1 ·,1 c t i vr' l c1 11d 11sr'&lt;; .i i l l1i •; k0y i1 pp1·o c1 c h1•1ay .

66

�•••••••1.,•••
SYMGOLI C ELH1EIH S Alm LANDMARKS
Sy111 bol ic ele111ents Cl'eate s trong visual images and give character to the city by vfrtue
of t l1e it· location, phy s icc1l appec1rance, and institutional importance. Bay City i s a
c&lt;' tilt ·c1 l-pL1cc cu111111uniLy 1-11,iclt i s a focus of econo111ic activity for tile sut-rounding t·e qion. 8ay r.ity'r; Crntr·;il Businrss District has symbolic importance over and above its
functional t'Ole. lire llH'vrolet plant sy1t1bolizes the enet·gy and i111portance of 111otor
veliiclr, 111a11ufacturing in 13,iy City. Center /\venue is lined with historic homes built.
by the l eading citizens of an e arlier time. It sy111bolizes the emergence and growth of
Buy f' i ty ;is an i111portctnt urban center. Veterans Memorial Park and the Middlegrounds
f'ark opC'n up the city to the Saginaw River and emphasize the river's symbolic irnportunce. I111portan t ne1-1 st rue tu res such as the Sea rs department store and the Ho 1 i day Inn
sy111bolize growth and 1evitalization in the city as does the recently-renovated City Hall
ul1 i r lt prnv i cfr-: s u 1 ink be l.1-Jc e n the Bay City of today and the Bay City of the past.
Mutty sy111ho l i c ele111ents i111portant to individual neighborhoods are scattered throughout
Bay City. Chi ef among these are the city's beautifully designed churches. St. Stanislau s, l1lll11anu e l Lutli e t·a n. and Holy Trinity, are all notables for their symbolic importance.
tl e ighbot ·hood parks s uc h as Carroll Park, Roosevelt Park, and Birney Park, play a symbolic
i-nle hy e nhc1n c: inq lhc t-r•,irlr.ntial ambiance of their neighborhoods.
/\ E S1 11 E r I C/\ L L Y- l} I S I' I_E /\ S I NG /\ RE AS

lhe 111ost pro111inent aesthetically-displeasing areas in Bay City line the Saginaw Rive1·
1-1h ere indu s trial develop111e11t often presents an unsightly view to observers on city
bridges or on the opposite river bank. On the east side of the river, unsightly develop111ent cc1n be found from 1-lcKinley Avenue to the James Clements Airport. On the west side
of the 1· iver, unsightly industrial facilities can be found from the Truman Parkway to
Bradley Street, and fro111 Salzburg Avenue to Niagara Street. Aesthetically-displeasing
ureas are al so locatr.d ulong major thoroughfares vihere older housing is beginning to
cider i nrr1 t e.

67

�"•
•
•II

._,...
~

-&lt;
z

i f)

----&lt;
'~'
,.._

I

rJ_

_ _J

;...-.
'

II
II

•II
Ill
Ill

'

~

I.-

: ante,

rL_
r o lurnb1H
~

u

rI

C
0

..,:,

!

_.r

_)

:,
~

l

C

.....

CI:

--- ·---::-. :::

I

~

I

-- -

I

I
I

:....

~

·- - ·...::...

::.·

; i -~--~

\

\

-.J

\

\

-

-

-

;....

-

�········••11•
ArPENDIX A- LIST or- SUB-AREA AND SPECIAL PURPOSE PLANS
I.

SUB-AREA PLANS
A.

Riverfront Ng_Et_li ]?_enew_~l Area General Neighborhood Renewal Plan, Parkins/Rogers,
.l:rnuarv, 1.971.
(Overall frame work plan for Patterson-Belinda, Jefferson-Lincoln, Downtown and
Midland Street areas.
Served as detailed plan for Patterson-Belinda Redevelopmr 11t Projcc.l.)

I\.

~v City Riverfront North Environmental Design Study, Parkins/Rogers &amp; Associates
i11 ,1s s nciation 1-:ith Christopher Wzacny &amp; Associates, March, 1972.
(Urban design s tudiE's for Patterson-Belinda, Jefferson-Lincoln, Downtown, Midland Street, Banks, Woodside and Johnson Strert l)istricts.
Also contained
urban dos ig11 s l11diC's for industrial areas.)

C.

Jeff e rson-Linct)Jn M.-ister Plan, Christopher \.Jzncny &amp; Associates, 1975 .
(L:111d u s r - 111·li;111 d c s1gn plan presented in map fonn only.)

ll.

n&lt;!..Y_J: it_y_ Do1-mt: (11m Red e velopment Plan, Chdstopher Wzacny
(llotnllc&lt;l l rl1td

11 sc

&amp; Associates,

1978.

trnnsportation plan for Bay City's Central Business District)

69

�, ••• ····•1111,a
E.

Midland Street ll_e_vtl2I1_ment Area, Phase I, Christ op her Wzacny &amp; Associates,
September, l CJ7Q.
(Ln11tl

F.

11 s e&gt;

,rnd c ir c u]ation concept plan for MidJand Street District.)

Columbus Avenllc Corridor Study, Phase 1, Christopher Wzacny &amp; Associates,
luly, .1979.
( l,:rnd us&lt; ' n11d

G.

1

· irc11l,1tion concept plan for Columbus Avenue District.)

South-End l'J:in 1 l'._!1_0_~e_l_, Christopher Wzacny &amp; Associates, May, 1980.
( l.;111d use ;ind c i rcllL1t .I.on plan for South-end lllstrict.)

I 1.

Sl'EC: 1 i\ l , l' llll l' tlSI '. l' l,1\ I!:;

A.

l~c-~o_v_cr_,·_ !'_c_li()11 P_r_n_g_ram, Christopher Wzacny f, As sociates, October, 1980.
( C it. ,·- 1.JidC' 11 :1rl

TL

:rnd r cc n .• ation plan and program.)

Communiy_J :~ n t ~ r ~l'_o__S~ lzburg /\venue Ex tens io_n, J\nde rson /Lesniak &amp; /\ssoci n t e s ,
Sc plt' mh c r- , 1_qg11.
(ll(' lni l t1 d cl1• ::i r- 11 pl;in for extensjon of Vetcrnns Memorial Park south to Salzburg.)

C.

Downtown Riverfront Promenade Design, Christopher Wzacny &amp; Associates,
Se pt e mber, JqRn.
(llv l ,1ilt•J 1Il1;!11 cl e'.~ lgn for riv e rfront development in downtown.)

70

�............
l!I. SPE CI/\l. S !III J!E S

/\.

[3_ay ~i__ ty__l_!_Q_us i11u Iss ~!?_~, Gerald Luedtke &amp; Assoc iates , 1980.
(flesc1·ipti () 11 of l1 ous ing problem s and altern at e so lutions.)

B.

r o_r t_fo_li _o of l~ivro 1J_!_'_ont Housing Ideas, Gerald Luedtke &amp; Associates, 19 Rl.
( Stati s tical d,1ta, information and urban design on potential housing site s
til e Sc1g i 11 &lt;11·1 I~i ve r.)

0 11

71

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007021">
                <text>Bay-City_Master-Plan_1982</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007022">
                <text>City of Bay City Planning Department, City of Bay City, Bay County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007023">
                <text>1982-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007024">
                <text>The Bay City Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007025">
                <text>The Bay City Master Plan developed by the City of Bay City Planning Department and introduced to the public in April 1982.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007026">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007027">
                <text>Bay County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007028">
                <text>Bay City (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007029">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007031">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007032">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007033">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007034">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038243">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54694" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58965">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6d0a915baf8fc8ac5d92d9831410759b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9cfe68eaec2b75407286d1f60ebd17fc</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008221">
                    <text>CITY OF FENTON, MIC

G

COMPREHENSIVE PLA
FRO ~ THE LIBRARY CW:

pi- n 113 &amp;

zn

JC

nter,

�City of Fenton, Michigan
Comprehensive Plan 1989

Prepared by the City of Fenton Planning Commission
with assistance from The WBDC Group.

Frank

ams

Kenn
E. Hanson
Ridwd&amp;al\k
Jlill'lllt11111'WIH!al

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
ELEMENT
I.

PAGE

POPULATION PROFILE
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.

II.

Historic Growth
Projections
Population Growth Scenarios
Racial Composition
Age

ECONOMIC PROFILE
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.

Employment by Industry
Employment by Occupation
Market Area Employment
Genesee County Industrial Parks
Income

III. HOUSI G PROFILE

A.
B.
C.

Housing Value
Age of Housing
Buildng Permit Data

IV. NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

V. TRANSPORTATION
A.
8.

C
D
E
F
G

1

Introduction
Traffic Accidents
North South Travel
Downtown Circulation
Downtown Parking
Id str al Pak Co nection
To ey Road ong L ke In I
Fre ay
Tra f V
o Pl

8
8

12
13
15
15
18
18

21
21
23
26

26
26
28
30

35

�ELEME T

v.

PAGE

TRANSPORT AT ION• con't •••
Access Management
Bike Paths
Gravel Pit Road

J.

K.
L.

VI.

39
39
39

EXISTING LAND USE
A.

Development Patterns
Image Analysis
Land Use Conflicts

8.

c.
VI I.

41

NATURAL FEATURES

51

Soils
Floodplains
Wetlands
Woodlots

51
51
53
53

A.
B.

c.
D.

VIII. HOUSING ANALYSIS

A.
B

c.
D

E
F

IX

C

A
8

41
44
48

54

Housing Conditions
Housing Mix
Housing Conversion
Hfstorfcal Homes
Hous ng or th Elderly
Future Acreage aeds
RCIAL

YSIS
e

54
55

7

5
62

�ELEME T

PAGE

x.

69

I DUSTRIAL ANALYSIS
A.
B.

c.
o.

Past Development Trends
Regional Perspective
Strengths and Weaknesses
Future Acreage Needs
COMMUNITY FACILITIES

XI.

A.
8.

c.
o.
E.
F.

Water System
Sanitary Sewer System
Capital Improvement Plan
Public Schools
Public Buildings
Parks

XII. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
ISSUES, GOALS, RECOMMENDATIONS

XIII.

A.
B.

c.
D.
E

F.
G.

XIV

xv
XVI

Transportation
Land Use
Natural Features
Housing
Connercial
Industrial
Co11111un ty Facilities
IMPLE E TATION

RECRE

ON

B BLIOGRAPHV

69
69
71

72

74
74
76
78
80
82

85

86
93

94
106

111
112

114
115
116

18

�TABLE OF TABLES

PAGE

TABLE
POPULATION GROWTH, CITY OF FENTON AND
SURROUNDING AREAS, 1950-1987

2

POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS, CITY
OF FENTON AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES, 1987 &amp;1992

2

POPULATION PROJECTIONS, FENTON AND
SURROUNDING AREAS, TO YEAR 2010

3

4.

POPULATION GROWTH SCENARIOS, CITY OF FENTON

1

5.

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP, CITY OF FENTON, 1980

9

6.

EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, CITY OF FENTON, 1980

11

7.

EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION, CITY OF FENTON, 1980

12

8.

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT ESTIMATES,
GENESEE AND SHIAWASSEE COUNTIES (FLINT MSA)

14

INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY, GENESEE AND
SHIAWASSEE COUNTIES, (FLINT MSA)

15

1.
2.

3.

9.

10. SUMMARY OF GENESEE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARKS, 1986
11.

HOUSEHOLD INCOME, CITY OF FENTON

16
16

12. MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, CITY OF FENTON AND
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES

18

13. MEDIAN HOUSING VALUE, CITY OF FENTO AND
SURROUNDING COMMUNJTIES

10

HOUSING VALUE, CITY OF FENTON, 1980

20

14

15. f(AR STRUCTUR'.£ BUilt CITY IF f!NITON

16
17.

BUILDING PERNIT DATA, CITY

If

9E- tl7

I

�TABLE OF TABLES, con't •••
TABLE

~

23.

SUMMARY OF ELDERLY POPULATION, 1987, FENTON

60

24.

PERCENT OF SENIORS NO LONGER ABLE TO LIVE
INDEPENDENTLY, 1987, FENTON

61

25.

RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE NEEDS

62

26.

EXISTING OCCUPIED RETAIL SPACE, CITY OF FENTON

64

27. COMMERCIAL ACREAGE NEEDS

68

28.

72

INDUSTRIAL ACREAGE NEEDS

�TABLE OF FIGURES
FIGURE
1.

PERCENTAGE SHARE OF POPULATION, FENTON AND
SURROUNDING Cort4UNITIES,. '80 .. 2010

2.

POPULATION PROJECTIONS TO THE YEAR 2'010,
FENTON AND SURROUND? AREA

3.

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP

4

INDUSTRY BY EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY, FLINT MSA

5

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, FENTON AND
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES

I

arn

22

6

AGE OF NOUSI NG.

7.

CITY OF FENTON NEIGHBORHOODS

8

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

9

DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC FLOW

10

EXISTING LAND US£, -,ENTON - 1917

11

IMAGE ANM.YSIS

12

NATURAL FEATURES

13

14

C

OF FEtfTOH - 1987

17

11

�•

I.

POPULATION PROFILE

A.

Historic Growth

Fenton first experienced dynamic population growth between 1860 and 1870,
when the population increased from 735 to 2,353. During the next century,
there was slow, but steady population growth. Fenton's growth rate soared
for two decades between 1950 and 1970. During those twenty years, Fenton's
population grew faster than most of the surrounding communities and Genesee
County overall.
Fenton•s population boom ceased from 1970 to 1980, as the population
decreased by 7.3 percent. Surrounding communities captured the area s
growth, during that decade, with population increases of 11.9 to 76.8
percent. Since 1980, Fenton 1 s population has increased slightly from 8,098
to 8,312 (1987 estimate).
1

Table 1 provides a comparison of growth rates for Fenton,
communities, and Genesee County between 1950 and 1987.
B.

surrounding

Projections

The 1980 U.S. Census provides the most current population benchmark for
comparing households. Effective planning, however, requires estimating the
current population and projecting into the future. Table 2 provides 1987
population estimates, and 1992 projections for Fenton, surrounding
communities, and Genesee County. This information is from National
Planning Data Corporation (NPOC), a recognized leader in preparing
small-area demographic updates and forecasts based on historic trends,
census data, and leading economic indicators.

Population projections for the Fenton area to the year 2010 have also been
prepared by regional planning commissions and the state. These projections
are shown in Table 3.

- 1 -

�Table 1
Population Growth
Cfty of Fenton and $Urrounding Areas~ ltS0-1R7
1950

CITY OF FENTON

4,226

1960

6,142

46.3 8.tM

Genesee County 270,963 374 313
Fenton Twp. ( 3) 2,153
Village of L ncten 933

4,327
1,141

Holly Twp ( 4)
1,367
Village of Holly 2,663
Rose Twp.
1,105
Jyrone Twp
1,039

2,282
3,269

r)

(l)

1,Ut

1,523

Indicates percentage g

1987 Estf 111te f
3) Fenton trownsh1
4) Holly Towns p

Source.

!L

101.0
22 8

'22' 9
8
34 t
46 Ii

�Table 3
Population Projection
Fenton and Surrounding Areas (to ,.,r 2910)

Location

1980

1990

20&amp;1

CITY OF FENTON

a.1,s

fl.Ult

11

Genesee County

450.449

441,400

Fenton Township
Village of Linden

9,510
2,174

s.,19

Holly Township

3,612
4,874
4,465

Village of Holly
Rose Township

2.1n

3,909

s.m

s.cn
1.m

4,53
s.t111
7,485

Tyrone Township
,111
&amp;,on
1 Conmunftfes 1n Ltvtngston &amp;Qaklaftd Counties hut
growth project101s between 280 aftd 2085
Source: Mt ch gan
GLS Re91
SEKCOG

Tbese project
8 840 fn the

s
Ce

!th

�Fenton Township's population is projected to nc-•~-Townshfp by 1,911 between 1980 and 2010. Pro eeted ,epultt on
Fenton and Holly Townships are
experienced between 1970 and 1980.
Figure 1 portrays each Fenton area c0R1Runity's percentage of
1980 and 2010. This figure highlights the fact that the
population base is expected to continue shifting sout-,rn
illustrates growth for the Fentoq area COhlWAities fo~ the years l
2010.
1-

�FIGUltE1
PERCENTAGE SHARE OF POPULATIO • --·• ~ii.f_l
AND SURRO
G COM..... ~,,,,. ..

�FIGURE2
POPULATION PROJECTIONS TO YEAR 2810
FENTON AND SURROUNDING AREA
1'800
15000

14000
13000

12000
11000

10080
C

00

0-.

...
N

�C

Population Growth Scenarios

Table 4 lists several population growth scenarioi tor Fent
agencies/firms using a variety of accepted projection method$
for comparison in identifying and quantifying future growth
informational purposes. the projections have bee~ averaged.
Table 4

Population Growth Scenarios
City of Fenton

A

B

C

D

E

1980

8,098

B.098

8,098

8 098

8,098

1987

8.312

NA

8,871

1,183

a.588

1992

8,407

NA

9.423

s.4t5

8,752

2000

NA

8,729

10 327

201-0

NA

B 840

11 411

Sou ce.
Scenario A:

Mat1Ma1 Plann ng

SGeu

G

1t

Q

8

�This plan will use the projections contained in Scenario E in considering
Fenton's future growth. Scenario E most closely represents the mid-range of the
various growth options.

o.

Racial Composition

The 1980 population in the City of Fenton was 99.1 percent white. Less than 1
percent of the populus were minority residents. The hispanic population
comprised .5 percent of the population.
E.

Age

Table 5 provides a breakdown of the Fenton population by age group. This
breakdown is also shown graphically in Figure 3.
Fenton, with 33.7 percent of its population in the 0-19 year old age group 1s
very similar to the state (33.6 percent). In the.20-64 age group Fenton (54.7
percent) is slightly lower than the state (56.6 percent). Fenton exceeds the
state's percentage of elderly population (65 years and over) with 11.6 percent
compared to the state's 9.8 percent. If Fenton follows the same pattern as
projected for the state through 2010, it will decline in percentage terms for
the 0-19 age group, and increase in both the 20-64, and 65 and over age groups.

II. ECONOMIC PROFILE
A. Employment by Industry
Employment by industry lists the workforce employed by sectors of t
economy, such as manufacturing, retail trade or education The Fento
fs similar to Genesee County and the state of Mich19lfl in
percentage (31 8 percent) of l:he peop e ire emp1eyetl

n th•

industry
Th-is compar•s to 39 8 percent o the Gent$• Cou
30 3 percent of the Michig1n workforce

�The service industry ranks a close second, employing 31.1 percent of the
workforce.
Service industry employment is higher than either the county or the
state, which employ 26.1 and 28.4 percent respectively.

Table 5
Population by Age Group
City of Fenton, 1980

Total Persons

A9e
Under 5 years
5 to 9 years
10 to 14 years
15 to 19 years
20 to 24 years
25 to 29 years
30 to 34 yea rs
35 to 39 yea rs
40 to 44 yea rs
45 to 49 years
50 to 54 yea rs
55 to 59 yea rs
60 to 64 years
65 to 69 years
70 to 74 years
75 years and over
.Median Age

# Minorit~

569
639
705
814
743
705
582
482
410
437
418
382
275
249
205
483

559
633
695
801
735
700
576
475
407
436
418
381
275
248
204
479

10
6
10
13

29.1

29.2

NA

* Minority includes Black, Hispanic, Other
NA - information not available
Source:

# White

U.S. Census Bureau

- 9 -

8

5
6

7
3

1
1
1
1

4

�FIGURE3
POPULATI
CITYO

BYAGEGROVP
0 .1•

�Wholesale/retail is also a strong employment industry for Fenton employing 22.5
percent of the workforce; this is higher than the county (19.4 percent), and the
state (20.1 percent).
A complete breakdown of employment by industry for the Fenton workforce fs given
in Table 6.
Table 6
Employment by Industry
City of Fenton, 1980
City of Fenton
Type of Business

i of Total Workforce*
# Employed
Fenton

Agriculture
4
Mining
7
Construction
147
Manufacturing
1,051
Transportation
106
Co1T111unications/Public
Utilities
50
Wholesale Trade
155
Retail Trade
587
Finance, Insurance, Real
Estate
110
Business and Repair Svc.
100
Personal. entertainment,
and Recreation Svc.
122
Professional and Related Svc. 806
Mealth
243
Educational

Public Administration

*
"

0.1
0.2
4.5
31.8
3.2

Genesee Co. Michigan
0.5

o.o
3.2
39.8
4.0**

1.5
4.7
17.8

16.5

3.3
3.0

4.2
3 1

4 '
3 S

3 7

2 7

24.4

20 3

34
21&amp;5

17

2 7

20 1***

454

56

1.7
0.4
4.1
30.3
5.7

Represent eo,nparfson of Fenton brea down to Coml
CodbfAes Trans ortation wt h Ccnnun ca 181\

�B. Employment by Occupation
Employment by occupation gives job characteristics for employees in the various
employment sectors. "Managerial and professional specialty occupations", and
"technical sales and administrative support" are the first and second highest
occupations of employment in Fenton with 26.8 and 23.8 percent respectively.
·As would be expected, due to the large percentage of the workforce 1n the
manufacturing industry, 19.1 percent of the workforce is employed fn
industry-oriented occupations such as operators, laborers, and assemblers.
However, since the above percentage is lower than the total 31.8 percent
employed in the manufacturing industry, many Fenton residents are employed fn a
managerial or technical sales capacity within the manufacturing sector.
A complete breakdown of employment by occupation is listed in Table 7.
Table 7
Employment by Occupation
City of Fenton, 1980
OCCUPATION
Employed persons 16 yrs. and over

I EMPLOYED

3,301

Managerial and professional specialty
Executive, administrative, managerial
Professional specialty

884

Technical sales and administrative support
Technicians and related support

786

Sales

Administrative support including clerfca1
service
Private household
Protective Service
A11 Other Service
fanning forestry, filsMfll

Precision production craf and fepa r

314

570

55

257

474
465

26

2
7

2

PERCENT

100 o
26 8

�c.

Market Area Employment

Market area employment trends tre a lead1ng
economic development out1ook ty"takfng tnt
provide a more accurate econ01111c picture thatl ju
residents. The City of Fenton 1$ located within tJ'tt fl Rt --~11:at
Fenton workforce could be working 1n Fenton or e1sewhere wt h
Similarly, many persons working or shopping in fentoa re de
Table 8 provides a 1980 and 1987 breakdollJl'I of
1•yn1Utl
Flint market area, which includes the counties of Geflessee 1
Table 8 indicates that the Flint area has ~nd•~•
workforcf between 1980 and 1987. Tbs decline has
the manuf•cturfng industry which lost nearly 13,000
service producing industries e,cperienced s11ght p ft
Wholesale and ret•11 ~ftdustrfes ncrused ~
wr,tk'l\llWll',I~•
5,000. General ser ice fndustrits p Md 2 200 du
t

Table 9 givas an emp o,ment
MetrDpoltt
Area
industry

�Ta.ble 8

C1v111an Labor Force a'ftd D_aplo.YIN'Qt Estffll es.
Genesee and Shiawas:see. Clut1t1e1 rr1t,tt
t.epol
1980 and 1987

CIYILIAN I.MGR FORCE
Elllplo.v-nt

unemplo.ymenrt
Ra1:e-

Nin1ng
Const~uct1on
Mamifae urt119

Durable Goods

Furniture and Fixtures
Lumber and Mood PrGdu:cts

!DO

�Table 9

Industry Employment Summary
Genessee and Shiawassee Counties
(Flint Metropolitan Stattstfc:a1 Aru. 1180 ..lftf1911l

Construction and Mfnfng
Manufacturing

s.100

4

70.400

S'1 HO

Trans. C0111111 1 &amp;ut111tfes

&amp;.200

4 AO

Wholesale Trade

9 200

H,100

30.700

33 ,VO

Retail Trade
Finance. Ins. Real Estate
Services
Government
Total Wage and Salary E,ftP
Note

Source.

tndllstr

�Table 10
Summary of Genessee County Industrial Parks, 1986
Park
1.

2.
3.
4.

s.

6.
7.

a.

9.

10.
11.

Name
Agree
Bishop
C11o
Commerce
Dort-Carpenter
Fenton US-23
Fenway Park
Hil 1/I-75
Holiday
Montrose
St. John

Total
Acres

Acres

Vacancy

Avail.

Ratd

43

30
15

30I

50
27

57
104
170
40
30

tOI

16
36
95

3ft

40

91S
231

14

351

50

21
29

37

37

180

701

22

73'

581
10M

12S

Source: News Report, Flint-Genesee Corporation for £eonmric Gn&gt;wth. Mey--. 1987
Table 11
Household Income
City of Fenton

Less than $7,500
$ 7,500 - $14.999

$15,000
20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$3

-

19,999

$24,999
$29 991
$34 999

16

15 S

�FIGURE4
I DUSTRY EMPLO

�Table 12
Median Household Income
City of Fenton and Surrounding Communities
Location

1979

1987

1992

CITY OF FENTON
Genesee County

$20.410
$20,996

$27,339
$27,580

$29,355
$30,500

·Fenton Twp.
Village of Linden

$26,360
$22,339

$31,032
$29,545

$34,247

Holly Twp.
Village of Holly
Rose Twp.
Tyrone Twp.

$22,279
$21,327
$26,193
$29,034

$27,179
$25,694
$32,086
$38,333

$28,888

$32,869

$27.237
$35,146
$43,143

Source: 1979 figures - U.S. Census Bureau
1987 estimate and 1992 projection - Nationa1 Planning Data Corporation

III. HOUSING PROFILE
A. Housing value.
The City of Fenton 1ncreaud by 486 heu; if
Despite a considerable number M lalcefront bas
housing units 1n 1980 we
Qccup ed ear....rltbndl-..
accounted for 75 2% of be tot.al nu11•r· ,occ:t11dilllJIIIIII

of

lower tha
ownsh1Jl)I

Fen on

�••

·····-

11

..,, a:

MEDIAN INCOME
~

0

w

C

;:,c

0

n

(fl

(I}

~

I\)

0

0

0
0
0

(fl

t.:&gt;
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

~

ff;.
0

U1
0

0
0

0
0

0

0

7.

~
0

CITY OF FENTON

z

C: tt'l
:;a:, :i::

GENESEE COUNfY

-:,

r-

i7

~o
0 t"'4

C: t::,

FENTON TWP.

C)

~~

0

"'

zzM
zo
t::, C:
r:,, 00

r►

0
::,:,

Z C C'l
C:
O&gt;:;:i::,
loo"j ~

&gt; ::C Ul

IT1

~
&gt;
n

"'?j

trj trj -

1-((i
t""

0

zo

a:

VILLAGE OF LINDEN

C")
(i tfj

(i

&gt;

0

--i
~

0

z

~
~
C:

HOLLY TWP.

~

VILLAGE OF HOLLY

~

r:,,

ROSE TWP.

TYRONE TWP.

$43134

(§I
~

\0

\0
N
,-._

"'C
~

0
~
.._,

■
1-4

\0

010
......
ti,
t:.,J

-"".l
.._,

.

�Table 13
Median Housing Value
City of Fenton and Surrounding Communities, 1980 and 1988
1980
Value

1988
Value 1

CITY OF FENToN

$42,300

61,513

Genesee County

$35,500

51,624

Fenton Twp.
Village of Linden

$56,600

82,309

Location

Holly Twp.
$41,400
Village of Holly
$38,300
Rose Twp.
$59,700
Tyrone Twp.
$66,400
1 Represents 1980 value adjusted to 1988
urban consumers.
Source:

60,204
55,696
86,816
96,560
using the Consumer Price Index for all

The U.S. Census Bureau and The WBOC Group

Considering only owner occupied, single family homes on less than 10 acres
(the classification applied by the Census Bureau in delineating value),
Table 14 details 1980 Fenton housing values.
Table 14
Housing Value, City of Fenton,1980
# of Units

Value
Less than $10,000
$10,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $29,999
$30,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,999
$150,000 to $199,999
$200,000 or more

9

56
245
923
503
40

9
l

Median Value:

source.

Us. Census

$42,300
Bureau

�B. Age of Housing
Table 15 gives a breakdown of housing age. Fenton's long tenn dee
city has produced housing in a variety of age groups As ftnt&amp;n &amp; tmu
continues to age, the city may have to establish a hQWsing ,...a•~
program should evidence of deterioration occur. Fenton present y
1,200 housing units 39 years or older Figure 6 gr1ph1ca11y f11u$trate&amp;
housing stock.
Table 15
Year Structure Built
City of Fenton
Year Built
1980 to 1987

1979
1975
1970
1960

to
to
to
to
1950 to
1940 to
1939 or

Mar 1980
1978
1974
1969
1959

1949
earlier

TOTAL. HOUSING YNITS

C

Bu ld1n

U..its

Percent

315

9.9

40
263
287

408
161

Ht
8'8

1.3
8.3
9 I

12 9
21.1
10.4
27 1
100 0

�FIGURE 6
AGE OF HOUSING
CITY OF FE TO -1987

HOUSING
U ITS
1-9YRS
1O- l 8YRS
19-38YRS
39 YRS&lt;

355
550
1077
1187

3169

SOURCE·
U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. CITY OF FENTO

�Table 16

Building Penn1t Data

City of Fenton
1980 ... 1987
Year

ny

1980
1981

12

1982
1983

7
7
6

1984

4

1985
1986

32
45

85

1987
TOTAL

e

Fam l I

198 (52 9)

t

5
0
0
2
12
48
418

117 (31 3)

source· 1980-1984 Data - Genesee Count, P
1985-1987 Data - City of Fenton

IV

N!IGlifBORMOOD PROnLE

The C ty of Fertt
p

�Table 17
Population, Housing and JnCOIIII ~ltt.Ncte
By Neighborhood
City of Fenton, 1980

Ne1 hborhood

1980
1980 Housing
units
Po

n

064

772
(4)

267
{5)

{4)

065

1806

104

23CJ
(t)

1968

655

Rank 1-10
Rank 1-10

066

Renk 1-10

(2)

( 1)

216

1)

(t)

73

067
Rank 1-10

(9)

(9)

068

370
(8)

139

Rank 1-10

(8)

�UJ&lt;£..,,....,..

_rrl
--~-

FIGURE 7

CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FENTON, MICHIGAN

NEIGHBORHOODS
(AS DELINEATED FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD STATISTICS PROGRAM&gt;

.

.. ... -

i..ri......J

�V

TRANSPORTATION

A

Introduction

Fenton's transportation ys • bes an inrportaht
in shaping the City's uture growth. Correcttfllg
w111 enable Fenton to meft
continues to grow
The Traffic Analysis MIP (Figure 8) pPov1des naiiilli'll't t intr&amp;fflilftiillil
accident 1oe~tf ons, iltte see:t1cm -whtc.fll arw eMfu
•
areas where act1,1t1 fra ,cttia
tlfld
1ft I s 'IMl!r•IWll1,.. lllllftkt'
along the street, daily traffic
capacities, and ,,eas where• new st
conditions, and recOtm1tod1tfons teb ~ s
detail fn the fGllowfrng sections

B

Jraff1c Accidents

��Action Alternatives:
Improvements to reduce accidents at spec1f1c fnterseeitm . .,11111~·-~·...a1r
detailed evaluation of accident patterns, signal tiMing etG
analysis of traffic issues which follows addresses tk fllWd
traffic operations at most of the interseet1ons lfsted lbove.
C North - South Travel
There are two major north - south routes through F
Streets. Both are two lane roadways carrpng
vehicles per day along various segment$. Eacft
characteristics that fnfluenee their
lfned with single family res1dent1,1 h
primarily by through traffic. Leroy
often with limited setbaeks which adds siff fie.ant y
volume when added to the tbr9ugh traffic

Many JDOtorJsts use Adelaide for lon
of the access1bi1fty to tbe US. 2
compared to Leroy Str•t
u,1r,9 L•ro, Street for lo
tbe circuiito
patt
C
re

�four 90 degree turns required and traffic congestion llt.rth
Square. Also, current traffic volumes on Nortb LerQY
iie.eft
intersection with North Road and the downtotffl are approadt 9 e11.aCill'\,}tl
a two lane street

Action Alternatives:
North - south through travel routes in Fenton need to ~
acconmodate both existing and future traffic volumes &lt;•ro,• eM:
the downtown are addressed in a later section of this p1u)
Leroy along its two lane segment ts one option. However. the dart
adjacent land uses along the street 1im1ts tie J)Otelit1al
Adelaide Street has sufficient capacity to handle lddi
adjacent land uses are sufficiently setback to allow flJtu
Therefore, for planning purposes Ade1afde Street stlotl1d be
primary through north-south route in Fenton for t~
oriented to the downtown Leroy Street shou d be ¥1 d l
to adjacent land uses such as Fent111 Square ob
nearby homes

Several re1at1 ely no fi111p
in,prove traffic flow
1_per1t1 sat Ille

s ltG

�D.

Downtown Circulation:

Streets in downtown Fenton
motorists patronizing businesses. The generalized ,e
based on intersection turning movements fs shown in Figqre 9
and turning movement counts were also used to esti•te tbe
travel patterns in the downtown area, as shown 1n the followfng tab :e
Table 19
Downtown Travel Patterns
City of Fenton
Movement
1.
2.

3.
4.
5
6.

1.

a.
g

N. Leroy to/f Offl S11ffr l e Rd./Roberti
N. Leroy to - from "'-in St

To/from Fenton Square (n. etwtrance}
Silver Lake Rd - Roberts to/~Nllft Main
N. Leroy to/from s. Leroy
Silver Lake Rd - Roberts to/fr• E. Roflerts
S Leroy to Main St.
Silver Lake Rd - Roberts to/fr
Other

$(1)urce:

�FIGURE 9

CITY OF FENTON DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC FLOW
(NUMBERS BASED ON PEAK

HOUR TRAFFIC COUNTm

••
SILVER LAKE
8750

�•
•
•
•

•

Earlier studies by a traffic engineering firm and the Genesee County
Planning Department recommended a partial one-way system around Fenton
Square.
Both of the previous recommendations were to make Walnut Street
one-way northbound and South Leroy Street between Silver lake Road and the
Community Center one-way southbound. Those studies were based on downtown
traffic
volumes which were much higher than are currently being
experienced.
The studies also included other design recommendations
intended to improve circulation in and around the mall.
Few of those
recommendations have been implemented.
Action Alternatives:
Three alternatives were considered to improve traffic flow:
ALTERNATIVE A - ONE WAY SYSTEM
This alternative would require traffic around Fenton Square to use Ellen to
Wa1nut for northbound and South Leroy for southbound travel. As noted
above, the one-way system was recommended in two previous studies. Cost of
the project would be minimal, requ1r1ng only signage and intersection
modifications along South Leroy Street at Ellen and the south Fenton Square
entrance. The intersection modifications could include brick pavers across
the street to emphasize Ellen to Walnut for northbound traffic.
This alternative improves northbound travel by eliminating the difficult
movement from South Leroy Street to Roberts Road to North Leroy Street.
However, the alternative of using Walnut is already available though seldom
used.
In spite of the general perception to the contrary, Leroy Street is
not currently used as the major north-south route through Fenton, and
should not be. Rather, Adelaide Street provides a more appropriate route
for through traffic, and is currently being used in this manner.
In addition, the one-way system does little to improve those movements
causing congestion, such as Silver Lake/Roberts Road to/from Leroy Street
and to/from Main Street.

- 32 -

�ALTERNATIVE B RECONNECT LEROY STREET
This alternative would reconnect the North/South Leroy Stri
existing Fenton Square. and more specifically. Dancers Sto.r.e
would improve traffic operations at the Silve~ Like Road ar,d Le
intersection but could also have undesirable impacts.
Since travel downtown would be less congested. some of the thNHJ1t11111
currently using Adelaide would probably shift to Leroy That woutl.d
traffic conditions north of the downtown where the potenttol fer w
1s restricted. This alternative also does little to fapl:"OVe the
traffic flows. such as between Silver Lake/Roberts Road and 1ft s•--...,.
In addition. the relocation of the Dancers Store would be costly
This alternative could also have a significant adverse tmpact on
Square by increasing fragmentation of th• Squa~•s
Implementation of this alternative would require art O~--~t ef
the Square. and would likely neeessitate some restlui~ to M1 1~r-M • d •
impacts

•••••1.-

1

ALTERNATIVE C CONNECTING SILVER UK£ ROAi

TI)

HAI

This alternative would include exteftd ng S lver
railroad tracks to co11ect
Me•,~~Mafn to
Ile

�Alternative C would reduce left turns fNJIII
Leroy Street by approximately one-third, ancf-¥
from Main Street onto North Leroy Street. llJU&amp; te t
traffic. an exclusive left turn phase !for eastbtt,,nd Sf1H
required. The result would be improved traffic oper
intersections.
Traffic operations could be fiurther improved if tllte nter·~••lj!•
Leroy Street at Silver Lake Road could be den.ed to lllflfln~•
lane for westbound traffic. A one sfdecl traffic s.tpa;l s
traffic only; or a signal timed to coordfntte w tft 'the
could be considered to malte left tu.ms f
-■,- te• ._N!llbtaMIIIII
Both of these reconnendatfons were made previously by tbe
Planning Department

Implementation of Alternative
ra11roed crossing and requ1reMettt for nwttreet
the project would be much mo
than optfcm B Since the t
crossings by reducing veh1'1
tood pat• tial f
e t:ate

�The southern entrance off Leroy Street is perceived by the untrained
motorist as a continuation of the street. There are no visual features to
highlight the entrance. The southern entrance has been a particular
problem with large trucks entering the parking lot and lacking sufficient
maneuvering space to easily exit the lot.
Each entrance to the Square provides access to only one of the sevetal
parking areas. The lack of connection points between the parking areas
forces motorists to re-enter the surrounding street system if unable to
find a parking space or to visit another store during inclement weather.
This situation creates conflicts with traffic using Leroy as a through
north-south route. Moreover, the segregated parking arrangement reduces
the potential for shoppers to patronize businesses at opposite ends of the
Square.
F.

Industrial Park Connection:

Fenton's two major industrial parks, Fenway and Fenton, are located just
east of U.S. 23. Though adjacent to one another, the two parks have
separate access systems, though a connection is desirable and feasible.
Fenway Park's entrance is along Silver Lake Road, which provides convenient
access to U.S. 23. Fenton Park is south of Fenway and has three tcce
points along Owen Road: at Alloy Drive, Industrial Drive and Steel Dr1
Those three routes provide access to the OWen Road/US 23 inter:cblRge
Alloy Drive is closest to the interchange, but has 'the least sig,tt
(12 to 15 seconds) looking to the west Industrt 1 Drift 1
park's main entrance but fs obscured by the conaeN:fal uses
sfgnage on either side Steel Drive fs the lftOSt visible and ffilnd,1,

the three ae~ess points

However

and is aef'iOss f OM oane~ta, rdri e

Due to the lack of• north~
tfflt two NUS M4 parts
VS 2

r:ed ov

he

�In addition to the desirability to connect the two fndustl"ial pe
is a need for a north-south connector fer intra-city tr1,eJ. SCllll■WI
between U.S. 23 and Adelaide. Environmental conditfons 11nrf the Dlld:e1'1l!t1
alignments of such a connector. Nuch of the area east of fie:
parks contains poor soils that would have to be reptac t• • 1
construction. An extension of either Alloy Drive or tei
complicated by the crossing of an identified wetland. tldwe er, e
this constraint into consideration, the short length l!'tefU Nd
Alloy Drive and the existence of public right-of-way make tt a
project.
Extending Steel Drive could also provide the connect on
1ndustr1a1 parks and serve as a connector route between
•
Owen Roads. Steel Drive has the most potential for as tnatttre en,YN~
provides the most direct connection,
between Adelaide and U.S. 23.
G.

Torrey Road/Long Lake Road Interseetfen

Several elements make tWe ffltersectfon of Leg take
difficult for moto 1st~ to travel through llest:botnid
Lake Road have sotne probl•s retctiftg to the relit
northbound traffic, as Mhicles on Torrey load
keep pace with parallel triaff
IS
traffic are al•a a

�H.

Freeway Access:

Fenton is fortunate to have three U.S. 23 interchanges wit a ttte
limits. The convenience of the freeway increases the desirabflity
value of the industrial and commercial land. Freeway avaf1ab11fty prov1dlts
Fenton residents wfth accessibility to employment opportunttfes within
region and. conversely, affords residents outside of Fenton easy a e
jobs and businesses in the City.
However, there are operational problems wfth tbe OWen Road i
which create an uncomfortable and potentially h•zardous s tuatio~
Owen Road bridge over U.S. 23 fs narrow and bas a steep crown wt'lictl
sight distance for motorists using the ramps. TIie sight distance ,r·C)b:l,eatt.a
may be contributing to the relatively high number of accidents occurr ng a
the fnnnediate vicinity. The Michigan Department of Transportation
11 ~e
installing a traffic signal at the ramp tenninal to help relieve t e
problems. The new traffic signal will improve safety but a long ran99
improvements such as widening the bridge to four lanes a•d reconst~
of the bridge with better ramp separation are needed. The n
--~--improvements will become greater as development occurs west of u.

I

Traffic Volume to Capacity latfos.

Traffic capacity problems•
heurs of activity at etch 1n

add

�when traffic volumes exceed this capacity motor sts ~ enc. ttedth"
delays. reduced speed and maneuverability, and an increased ~ a
accidents. Generally when volumes are over 25 to 5GI of
capacity congestion becomes severe and improvements or all'D!fi"illflt~t11111
should be considered).
Comparisons between current averege daily traftic m1ames .a
desired capacities ar,e shown below and in F1~ B l1M'! table
two street segments which are current1y carryir:19 YOllllleS gN!IWtw
are designed to handle without experiencing som cOllgestf on
Street between North Road and First/Main Street and 2) O..n
Jennings to West Shiawassee. The remaining six segm,ents 1n the tale
have volumes approaching or exceeding generaltzed C:IQtat
timeframe of this study, depemttng Ofll:" tk pha ~
development in and around Fenton

Table 20
Volume to Capacity Ratios

Strut
Leroy

COIOG

�J.

Access Maftagement.

Major streets in Fenton. such as Silver 1
to 11Gve traffic Access to ad]acent lind uses,. td'n!t'IIW
residential. 1s en 1111,ortallt second:ary an111"11"'1Pft11l
1

of each driveway d1ntf~fsh the streets ca:pac ty
Careful planning of the number. location and desfp of dr11¥e1•t·
preserve the capacity of tie street. ffrts
protect the pubHc 1Mestment in the street
costly widenings or other 1mprov1111tt11ts.

-~1:-

There are examp 1es of l&gt;oth good •nd bad access un1g,B111NJ111.·

OWen Road the number and spacing of dr1¥eW.an
control 1ed

The 1ack of access ma11a9ertelft a lent 11a1.ar,
the congestion and accidents e~per enced t1ont tbat ,_.._

K

Bike Paths.

fo:r en
Biqc

�Gravel Pit Road presently provides the only good access for the land south
of West Shiawassee to the city limits. Existing development has greatly
limited opportunities for an alternative north-south access road in this
area. The road is paved but is in poor condition. The distance the road
is offset from Steel Drive at Owen Road is not ideal but could not be
realigned without the elimination of high school ball fields to the east.
We recommend that the city pursue dedication of the road to the city to
provide future access for residential development.

�VI

EXISTING LAND USE

A Development Patterns

The last detailed land use ana1Js1s c-oGducted prto
the 1975 Fenton Master Plan for Lar:ld Use. TIN! hi
that plan was conducted in larch rf l9r14 A ltedtMffl
contained 1n each land use category from the 1974
Table 21.
Existing land use for the City was updated for lh1s p1aa
and is shown in Figure 10
A bre1k...,_ &amp;J·-ac:MIHle
category and percentage of developed and bl"« 1 ncl 1
The percentage figures of total laAd froiu, the 1974 SdNef
for comparison purposes

0Yera 11 growth during the l &amp;st 13
There has been

llllilJ"li..._,

�occurring at the Owen Road/US-23 interchange
•

The number of homes in the Silver Lake SubdiY1si

In sunnary, approximately 427 acres were developed during tile
period for an increase 1n developed land of 26 5 percent. This deve e
rate represents an average annual growth rate for the per od
percent.
Table 21
Existing Land Use Acreages
City of Fenton. 1974

Land Use

Acres

Residential
One Family
Two Family
Mul t 1 Fam11 y

581.1

Business

115.8

2.7

91.8

2.1

i35 1

54

Industrial
Public

Schools
Buildings
Open Sf)ace
Parks

Quasi Publ c.

Churches I

OAS

1 of Total

552.7
10.6

13.3
12 7

It

84

17.8

51.J

72

��Table 22
Existing Land Use Acreages
C1ty of Fertton, October, 1987
Ac-res

Oct 1987

I Developed 1 o'f T««1
Land
Oct 1187

Single Family
Multiple Fam1ly 2
Colllnercial
Office
Gen Retail

156.29

Public

200.8

99

4.1

Quasi-Public
Iftdustri al

70.5
105.4

35

S2

1'
2 2

R1ghts of Way
(RR &amp;Streets}

657 8

32 3

15 1t

758.8

37 2

64 4
179.4

3.2

Z3.07-

Undeveloped
Water

2105 6

TOTAL ACRES

4353 6

1
2.

8 8

11 4
1S
41

210.9

---

I
I !

48 3

4.1

J

�A visual image analysis for the City of Fenton was conducted to help
analyze identified issues and provide a foundation for land use policies.
Specifically, Fenton's major image assets were identified so that they
could be maintained or enhanced in the future; and the City's major visual
problems were identified so that recommendations could be developed to
reduce or eliminate their negative influence. The analysis is strongly
oriented to main travel routes since they are the areas where the strongest
impressions are formed. The following narrative description correlates
with the information found on the "Image Analysis Map" (Figure 11).

Main Street Corridor:
•

The transition from agricultural to residential uses creates a pleasant
entry from the east.

•

The lumber yard has a negative visual impact on Main Street and also
the Central Business District.

Owen Road Corridor:
•

The Fenton High School athletic fields have the effect of reducing the
number of driveways along this corridor while producing positive visual
character.

•

Effective implementation of zoning controls, fer setback dr1Y
spacing, and landscaping. have resulted 1ft a pl
impression.

~est Shiawassee Corridor:

al,,.. with utstand
1~t~e~~-

�.

POTeNTIAL
RECREATION AREA

POSITIVI! ENTRY ZONES CIWIACT11R
NEGATNE l!NTRY ZONE CKARACTIR

FIGURE 11

POSITIVI CITY FOCAL POINT

CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FENTON, MICHIGAN

( EXISTING

LAND USE)

NEGATIVE CITY FOCAL POINT
POSITI\I£ STAE£TIICAPI CHARAC1'ER

NEGATM: STRUTIICAPE CHARACflll
ltlSTORIC RIISOURCI!
NAT\IRAL RESOUIICII

PRIMARY VISUAL l!DGII

.J,ISilJL
INILll'AIII.Y

1111.11'1.1 Ml&amp;Y

CGlllallCIAL

■

CIMCII

LAND UIIIMIUAL CCMIJCf
PUILIC

··--·- ·QUAIH'lalC/liSfflll'n0tW,.

IIOll8TlaAI.

UICEVl&amp;.QIIID

�North Leroy Corridor:
•

Inadequate parking lot screening, poor signage, and high
visibility create and unattractive streetscape.

utility line

North Leroy/CBD Corridor:
•

Poor land use transition from commercial to residential uses has
resulted in an undefined image for the area. Commercial uses have
encroached into single family areas as they have expanded from the
Central Business District.

•

Poor streetscape character detracts from the

visual

quality of the

area.
•

The close proximity of buildings and exposed
roadway creates visual clutter and confusion.

parking lots to the

Silver Lake Road Corridor:
•

Silver Lake/Poplar intersection creates no "sense of entry

11

into the

city.
•

Residential

uses along Silver Lake Road generally reinforce a positive

image.
Central Business District (CBO):
•

Fenton Square is not effective as a town center focal point Poor s te
design, circulation, and access contribute to a unattractive and
non-cohesive image which negates many of the positive aspects of
adjacent buildings and spaces.

•

The government center area has many fine features including the gazebo,
Mill Pond government complex, churches, and other architectura ly
significant structures, which make 1t a very positive focal point for

the City.

- 47 -

�Dibbleville:
•

This two block commercial district, which was part of Fenton's original
business district, adds a unique character and architectural interest
to the city. Dibbleville is registered as a Michigan Historic Site.

Mill Pond and Shiawassee River:
•

A primary natural resource that has great potential
recreational resource throughout the community.

C.

Land Use Conflicts

as a visual

and

There are several land use conflicts within the community (Figure 11).
Each of these conflicts are addressed below·, with recommendations
following.
Expanded Plastics:
Expanded Plastics represents the most severe case of land use
incompatibility in Fenton. The negative impacts presented by the facility
are caused by several factors, which are listed below:
•

As an industrial use, it is incompatible with the adjoining retail
governmental, and residential uses.

•

The building is unattractive and detracts from the aesthetic quality of
the area.
It lacks sufficient

room for landscaping

-

The site 1s overbuilt.
parking and loading.

•

Trucks and truck trailers serving the company obstruct traffic movement
and routinely park within street right-of-ways.
- 48 -

�Valley Lumber:
Valley Lumber, located on Main Street next to the Michigan Bean Company,
lies at the eastern entry into the CBO. As a heavy cof!ITlercial use, the
first impression created by the lumberyard is inconsistent with the retail
character of the CBO.
Machine Tool &amp;Gear and Industrial Training Center:
These industrial uses are located on the northern edge of the CBD, on North
Leroy near Second. They negatively impact the conrnercial image in a
transition area from the Fenton Square retail core to the strip commercial
extending along North Leroy.
Best Self Storage:
The Best mini-storage is located west of North Leroy and south of Trelout.
The location between two multiple family developments results in land use
incompatibility.
Plastics Research:
Plastics Research creates a negative entry image into the Bush Community
Park. The negative image is the result of unscreened storage of materials
and truck trailers in close proximity to Jefferson Street. The east side of
the building, which is unattractive, is unscreened and in full view from
the park. As an industrial use, Plastics Research is also incompatible
with the adjacent school, park, and surrounding residential homes.
Gerych's Greenhouse:
Gerych's is located on Silver Lake Road between the CBD and U.S 23
As a
commercial business, it receives good exposure on a major traffic route.
however, land use conflict exists because it is located in a residential
area. The existing residential character along ilver Lake Road should be
maintained in this area Additional commercial development will create a
confusing image for both use types

- 49 •

�Creative Foam:
Creative Foam is an isolated industrial use located on Beach Street north
of the railroad tracks. Land use incompatibility exists, because three
sides of the building are adjacent to single family homes and a medical
facility.
Fenton Cinema:
The Fenton Cinema presents a land use conflict by its location within the
Fenway Industrial Park. Introduction of additional commercial uses in this
industrial area will undermine the integrity and image of the park.
Summary:
As short term solutions, we recommend that identified land use conflicts be
minimized through implementation of the following on-site improvements or
actions:
•
•
•

enforce existing City ordinances
eliminate uncontrolled parking of vehicles or storage of materials
encourage businesses to increase use of buffering/screening techniques

It is also recommended that the Expanded Plastics facility be relocated at
the earliest possible time. The severity of its impacts and its high
visibility within the CBD make this action necessary.
Long term recommendations are that the above listed land use conflicts be
either contained, transferred into more compatible uses, or eliminated.
Zoning restrictions should be developed to help in achieving this goal.

- 50 -

�VII.

FENTON NATURAL FEATURES

An evaluation was conducted in Fenton for soils, floodplains, wetlands, and
wood lots. Each of these natural features is discussed below and
illustrated in Figure 12.
A.

Soils

An evaluation of soil types for all undeveloped land in Fenton was
conducted to determine development limitations. The rating of each soil
type was based on information contained in the Genesee County Soil Survey
published in April, 1972. This survey was compiled by the United States
Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service with field work being
performed during the years 1962 to 1966.
All soil types were classified as having either slight to moderate
development limitations or severe development limitations.
Soils
identified as having severe limitations had some combination of the
following characteristics:
•
•
•
•

Flooding
Ponding
Low bearing strength
High shrink-swell potential

•
•
•
•

Unstable organic material
High frost heaving
High water table
Steep slopes (121 or greater)

These soils are identified as poor soils on the Natural Features Map. A
site having a soil type rated as having severe limitations does not
necessarily mean that it cannot be developed, but rather that on
site-testing of the soil, or some site alteration may be required
.Development on these soil types typically involves a higher cost of
construction.

B. Floodplains
Land areas located within the 100 year floodplain, as detennined by th
Federal Emergency Management Agency, are shown in Figure 12 Floodp1a1n
areas as shown are approximate and the official flood insurance rate caap
shou1d be referred to for 1nsuraAce purposes A 100 year floodp1a1 1

- 51 •

�FIGURE 12

CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FENTON, MICHIGAN

[

NATURAL FEATURES

)

J.IIIIIL
•

1IO YIM l'QOD ,LMI

----....--·
------··---

Wfll.AND9

...

wooauns

�defined as an area within which there is a 1 percent chance in any year of
a 100 year flood occurring. Floodplains serve as water recharge areas and
natura1 water retention basins during periods of heavy precipitation or
Spring snow thaws. Development with the 100 year floodplain should be
discouraged.
C.

Wetlands

Wetlands were determined by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and
Wildlife Service through interpretation of high altitude aerial photographs
(aerial photography date: October 1978).
A wetland means 1and characterized by the presence of water at a frequency
and duration sufficient to support, and that under norma1 circumstances
does support, wet1and vegetation or aquatic life. Wetlands serve several
important natural functions including:
• Flood and storm contro1
• Provides a water recharge area
• Wildlife habitat
• Erosion control
• Natural pollution treatment system
Wetlands should be given serious attention in the master plan process
because of the importance of preserving their natural functions.
Wetlands
also impact planning through their protection under the Goemare-Anderson
Wetland Protection Act (Act 203, 1979. The Wetland Protection Act, to a
large degree, restricts or prohibits development within a wetland.
D.

Woodlots

Woodlots (large tree stands) represent a valuable natural and aesthetic
resource. In a city such as Fenton, which is largely developed and
continues to grow, they provide a natural element which offers visual
relief from an otherwise man-made environment. Woodlots can also be used
effectively as a natural buffer area between land uses or used to create
focal points. Planning and zoning measures which maximize the retention of
woodlots should be implemented.
- 53 -

�VIII.
A.

HOUSING ANALYSIS

Housing Conditions

A windshield survey of housing conditions was conducted in October 1987.
Housing was evaluated using a three category classification system. The
criteria used to assess the condition of the homes was: roof appearance,
siding appearance, foundation, and yard condition. Based on the rating of
these features, the homes were classified into one of the following three
groups:
Good to Excellent Condition
• Well maintained structure
• The yard is maintained consistent with community standard.
• If required, repairs are only cosmetic in nature.
• Roof and gutters are free from sagging.
• There is no evidence of foundation or exterior facade defects.
Fair to Good Condition
• Fairly well maintained structure.
• The yard is fairly well maintained.
• Several repairs and or maintenance tasks are required, but there is
no
evidence of significant structural damage.
• Home is in need of aesthetic improvements such as painting.
• Roof or gutters require some degree of repair.
• Upgrading the home to a "Good to Excellent ConditionN is warranted
given physical and economic considerations.
Poor Condition
• Structure is dilapidated.
• Major repairs would be required to upgrade rating classification
• Major structural deterioration. such as. roof, foundation and
exterior walls is evident.
- 54 -

�•
•

Lack of outside yard maintenance, and/or an unacceptable amount of
outside storage including junk or waste materials.
Upgrading the structure would be extremely costly, or it is beyond
repair.

The results of the survey revealed that despite an aging housing stock (By
1990, 65% of Fenton's housing units will be 30 years of age or older, and
50% will be 50 years or older) nearly all homes within the city were either
in good or fair condition. There were very few homes which warranted a
poor rating.
Based on the rating of individual homes, areas characterized by housing
within each classification were identified and delineated as shown in
Figure 13.
The "Poor Condition" classification was eliminated on the map due to the
limited number of homes rated in this category. However, the number of
homes in the poor condition category for each neighborhood is contained in
Tab e 17.
Each classification type represents the dominant character of the area, but
does not necessarily classify every structure in the area under that
rating.
Figure 13 also identifies low/moderate income blocks as noted in the report
"Community Development Block Grant Block Level Eligibility, Genesee County,
Michigan, January 1985 11 prepared by Public Demographics Inc •• These blocks
qualify for Co!ffllunity Development Block Grant assistance, since at least 51
percent of their population is classified as in the low/moderate income
group.
B.

Housing Mix

Recently there has been concern expressed about the balance between single
family and multiple family housing units within the city. There is al o
concern about how the recent increase in multiple family development will
impact the stability of what historically have been single family
residential neighborhoods.
- 55 -

�f

....

....-

I

l . . . . . . . .~._:_~

I

-

FIGURE 13

CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FENTON, MICHIGAN

[ HOUSING CONDITIONS)

4IOOD TO llCCILLINT

MIi TO Cl0CXI

LOWIIIOmllAfll lNClca ILOClltl

•

�The 1980 census indicates that 81 percent of the city's 2,852 year round
housing units were single family homes. Multiple family housing units
comprised nearly 19 percent and mobile homes made up less than 1 percent.
Residential development
from the 1980 breakdown.
percent of new housing
housing units recording a

between 1980 and 1987 has differed dramatically
Single family housing has only accounted for 63
built during the period, with multiple family
strong 37 percent.

The change in the balance of single family and multiple family housing
which occurred between 1980 and 1987 has not substantially affected the
overall housing balance. In 1987 single family housing made up 79.3
percent of total year round housing, and multiple family housing 20.7
percent. This means that the percentage of multiple family units has
increased by only 2 percent since 1980.
If the residential trend established between 1980 and 1987 continues for an
extended period of time there will be a noticeable ~hift in the residential
character of Fenton. However, as of 1987, Fenton falls within a typical
range for percentage of multiple family housing (generally 10 to 30
percent).
There is no magic percentage for multiple family development. The city
should assess the type of residential image they wish to have, and equally
important determine if there is sufficient demand and suitable locations
for such development.
C.

Housing Conversion

The City of Fenton has many large older homes. Many of these homes exhibit
fine architectural style and some are designated as national or state
historic sites. Due to the high cost of maintenance and utilities for
these homes, owners have begun to approach the city about converting them
into multiple family units. Typically these homes are within a single
family zoning district, such as the homes along Shiawassee between Adelaide
and Owen Road. There has also been concern expressed about the impa~t
converted homes will have on the surrounding neighborhood.

- 57

�Upon first consideration it would appear that not the conversions should
not be permitted. This reaction could be based on a perception of
overcrowding, inadequate parking, or improperly maintained rental
properties; and these factors should be strongly considered. In some
cases, those perceptions may be misguided, or overstated.
Prohibiting all conversions also presents some problems. In some cases a
large home may be owned by an elderly person who has lived there for a long
period. They may wish to remain living there, but financial constraints
may prohibit or severely limit home maintenance or repairs. They are left
with two options: (1) to remain living in the house which would undergo a
gradual decline in quality, or (2) to sell or rent the home and find new
housing.
While the city should not encourage conversion of all large homes,
conversion should be permitted under very controlled circumstances. Within
the zoning ordinance, conversions could be controlled through use of the
special use permit process. Conditions could be established which would
minimize the impact of conversion on the neighborhood. For example: the
number of units could be limited to two or three per home, a minimum unit
size could be imposed, and onsite screened parking could be required.
Recognizing that some of these homes may not have resident owners and there
may be a few cases of property decline, the city could adopt a rental
property maintenance code. This code would set interior and exterior
maintenance standards which would have to be met by all rental properties.
Inspections could be conducted on an annual or bi-annual basis.
D.

Historic Homes

Historic homes are truly the essence of Fenton's character. The follo 1ng
list details all Fenton area homes listed on the state and federal register
of historic places.

- 58 -

�Federal Register:
Benjamin Bangs House
819 s. Leroy Street
Volney Church, Carlos B. Shotwell House
812 S. Adelaide Street
David B. Colwell House
901 S. Leroy Street
Colonel J. Hinckley House
210 High Street
H. N. Jennings House
800 S. East Street
Vermont House
302 N. Leroy Street

State Register:
Fenton House
302 • Leroy Street

These homes should be targeted for ongoing preservation activities
The
city should also consider other public improvements which would enhance the
neighborhoods which contain these homes.
E. Housing for the Elderly
National, statewide and county trends demonstrate the need for sen or
housing as the population of elderly (over 65) continues to rise faster
than the total population.
- 59

�Based on the low and moderate income level of $22,065 (80% of Genesee
County's median household income), we have identified 1170 households in
Fenton in the low and moderate income range and approximately 3065 persons
living in those households in 1987.
In 1980, 1212 people were identified as elderly (60 and older) in Fenton 1206 white and 6 minority. This accounted for 15% of the population. On a
national basis, approximately 16.4% of the population was 60 years and
older in 1984. Therefore, we can assume Fenton's elderly population is
about the same percentage as the national trends for 1984.
The 1987 Fenton
projections to the
that growth trends
elderly population

estimate for elderly population is based on Census
year 2030 of 26.9% of the national population. Assuming
are steady during that period, we can project Fenton's
to 17.1 percent of the 1987 population or 1,421 persons.

If we assume the low and moderate income elderly population is about the
same percent of the low and moderate income famili~s as it is with the
total population, we have identified about 524 senior citizens in the low
and moderate income category.
Table 23
Summary of Elderly Population, 1987
Fenton, Michigan
Low/Moderate
Income Elderly

Age Groups

Total Elderly

60 &amp;over

1421

524

65 &amp;over

1098

405

Source:

u. s.

Bureau of the Census, and The WBOC Group

Concerning housing needs for the elderly, many of the elderly residents
will prefer to live independently and only a few will require specialized
care. According to national figures, the percent of senior residents
requiring daily living assistance is quite low for those 65 and over

- 60 -

�Table 24
Percent of Seniors No Longer Able to Live Independently, 1987
Fenton, Michigan

Age Groups
65-69 years
70-74 years
75 years &amp; older

Requiring Living
Assistance

Requiring Living
Low/Moderate
Assistance in Fenton Elderll Reg.Asst.

2.6%
5.1%1
19.3%

8

Total:
1

3
4

12
109

40

129

47

Represents the average percentage for the three age categories: 75-79,
80-84, and 85 and older.

Source:

Real Estate Research Corporation
The WBDC Group Estimates

Based on the above, 109 senior citizens require some type of daily living
assistance while 47 of this number are classified in the low and moderate
income range requiring some kind of living assistance.
The City of Fenton has one elderly housing project (Dauner House) which has
100 elderly units. In addition, a new facility is planned just north of
the city. These two facilities should provide for the needs of Fenton in
the short term future. The elderly population will continue to grow.
Additional quantifiable data should be developed to assure future housing
provisions for the elderly.
The plan also contains several general recommendations which should benefit
the elderly in finding suitable and affordable housing. These
recommendations include: a provision for single family to multiple family
conversion, thus enabling seniors or low income households living in large
single family homes to stay in their homes because of the additional
revenue received from rental fees; that a variety of housing types and
sizes be provided in the city; and the selection of a suitable site for
manufactured housing which to date has proven to be a popular housing
choice of the elderly.

- 61 -

�F. Future Acreage Needs
Comparison of the 1974 and 1987 land use surveys provides a basis for
projecting future residential acreage needs. There were 242 acres
developed residentially during that time, resulting in an annual average of
18.6 acres.
Projecting the 18.6 acre average from a base acreage of 823 in 1987, Fenton
will require an additional 93 acres by 1992, and a total of 428 acres by
2010.
Another method of determining acreage need is to maintain the existing per
capita acreage for future population increases. Using this method, Table
25 identifies the number of additional acres needed by 2010 to meet
residential need for Fenton and surrounding communities.

Table 25
Residential Acreage Needs
PROJECTED
1987 EXISTING ACRES NEEDED
ACRES
1992
CITY OF FENTON

823

866

PROJECTED
ADDITIONAL
ACRES NEEDED ACRES NEEDED
2010
BY 2010
1,039

216

Surrounding 1
Communities
1 Surrounding Communities include Fenton Twp., Village of Linden, Holly
Twp., Rose Twp., and Tyrone Twp.
2 Value was calculated using Fenton's per capita residential acreage.
Source:

The WBDC Group

Surrounding communities are included in the above table because of Fenton's
potential to satisfy a portion of the housing need in these areas.

- 62 -

�IX. COMMERCIAL ANALYSIS
A.

Regional Perspective

The City of Fenton is located along U.S. 23 about 10 miles south of the
Flint urbanized area. Fenton, in addition to serving its own urban
population, acts as a suburban/rural retail center encompassing portions of
Genesee, Livingston, and Oakland Counties. Fenton's primary retail service
area encompasses an area within an eight mile radius around the City and
includes the Villages of Linden and Holly. The city's commercial base is
large enough to provide everyday goods and services and also capture a
significant portion of the larger comparison goods market. Still, Fenton
residents shop at regional malls in the cities of Flint, Ann Arbor,
Brighton, and Novi for some comparison goods.
8.

City-wide Perspective

The City of Fenton contains three distinct retail. districts: 1) along
North Leroy, Central Business District (CBD), and 3) along Owen Road. A
report of the Downtown Revitalization Committee prepared in December of
1984 identified the amount of occupied retail space in each of the three
districts classified in the following categories: convenience goods,
comparison goods, and general retail, as shown in Table 26.
This table provides a good general indication of the magnitude of each of
the districts as well as the merchandise types contained in each. A more
descriptive analysis of each co1m1ercial district is given below.
C.

Retail Analysis By Individual Commercial District

A description of each of Fenton's three commercial districts is given below
along with the identification of each districts strengths and weaknesses.
North Leroy District
The North Leroy District which is Fenton's largest retail district in
square feet of retail space represents a typical modern day commercial
strip center. This district is located along North Leroy from the north
- 63 -

�Table 26
Existing Occupied Retail Space
City of Fenton (Square Feet)
Total

Downtown

N. Leroy

Owen Rd.

Other

6,504
10,600

82,540
8,800

26,000
0

2,200 117,244
0 19,400

General Merchandise 8,150
Apparel/Accessories 18,070
Furniture/Appliances 1,664

53,300
13,280
3,800

0
0
0

0
0
20,000

61,450

Eating/Drinking
15,124
Places
Bldg. Mat'l/Hardware 19,625
Miscellaneous Retail 7,300

18,638
19,800
17,643

20,000
6,000
0

5,370
17,000
3,100

59,132

87,037

217,801

52,000

47,670 404,508

Convenience Goods
Food Stores
Drugstores
Comparison Goods
31,350
25,464

General Retail

TOTAL
Source:

62,425

28,043

Fenton Downtown Revitalization Committee, December, 1984

city boundary south to the CBD. Types of retail business include:
discount stores, fast food restaurants, auto service, home furnishings,
apparel, building supplies, specialty food, and general retail. This
district also contains two mini strip containing both retail and service
establishments.
Assets:
•
•
•
•

Location on the primary north-south route through the City
Largest retail district in the City.
Greatest selection of merchandise types.
North Leroy has been widened to a five-lane road.

- 64 -

�Weaknesses:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Insufficient landscaping along frontage and within parking lot areas.
High utility line visibility.
Poor building facade treatments.
Poor blending of facade materials and design from one business to the
next.
Land use conflicts (frequent intermixing).
Insufficient building setbacks.

Central Business District
The central business district, located at the City's center ranks second in
retail
floor space.
Although one district, ft contains several
distinguishable retail/office elements which include:
•
•
•
•
•

Fenton Square Mall.
Strip commercial development along North Leroy:
Predominantly medical office complex immediately west of Fenton Square.
City Government Administrative Complex immediately south of Fenton
Square.
Oibbleville historic commercial district located at West Shiawassee
and South Leroy.

Retail
and business activity in this district is characterized by
restaurants, personal services, offices, apparel shops, and specialty
shops.
Assets:
•

•

•
•

The central business district has a strong locational advantage with
all major traffic routes passing through or terminating within the
district. The CBO is also only a few minutes from the US 23 Freeway
High visibility.
Having the City of Fenton administrative offices located within t~e
district serves as a consumer draw for all commercial businesses
Office development provides a source of daytime cu~tOlfters for OBI

businesses

�•

The Mill Pond, Shiawassee River, and the park setting adjacent to the
City Hall create visual interest and are a natural draw to the area.
The Oibbleville commercial district and Fenton Square offer many fine
examples of historic structures with a variety of architectural styles.
The Fenton Hotel and the Michigan Bean Company, two of the Fenton
area's finest restaurants, are located within the district.

•
•

Weaknesses:
•

Fenton Square
Poor signage
Entrances lack signature quality and are confusing
Poor circulation within the Square
The quantity of businesses within the Square cannot be determined
from the perimeter roads.
The buildings have not been designed to work well together. Main
entrances/facades of certain buildings are not oriented to those
of others.
Conflicting architectural styles.
The Square lacks an inviting atmosphere which could be created by
a coordinated landscape design.
Difficulty in attracting customers after business hours.
•
•

•
•

Retail business mix.
Lack of parking in the Dibbleville District
Land use conflicts. Several heavy commercial or industrial uses are
incompatible with the commercial image of the CBO. The Expanded
Plastics Company located just south of the city administrative offices
is a good example of this situation.
Through traffic movements in the CBO are very difficult
Poor conmercial district image as one enters the CBD fr0111 the north
along N. Leroy.

OWen Road District
The Owen Road District is the smallest of the City's three major commerc al
districts in quantity of retail floor space This district due to t

�location at a U.S. 23 Freeway interchange.
commercial uses. Uses in this district include:
car dealerships, a bank, and a motel.

is oriented to highway
fast food restaurants,

Assets:
•
•
•

Easy entry to and exit from the U.S. 23 Freeway
Good streetscape character
Attractive business structures

Weaknesses:
•
•

Poor design of the Owen Road/U.S. 23 interchange.
Average daily traffic volumes on Owen Road exceed street capacity.

There are also assets shared by all the commercial districts. These
include: small town atmosphere, retailers know customers on a personal
basis, close proximity to the consumer population.·

D.

Future Acreage Needs

The commercial outlook for Fenton is prom1s1ng. Population within the city
and the surrounding area is projected to increase by over 20,000 by 2010.
The Fenton Downtown Revitalization committee in a 1984 report found unmet
demand in the following retail areas: drugstores, general merchandise,
furniture and appliances, restaurants, building material/hardware, and
miscellaneous retail. In their 1987 "Sourcebook of Demographics and Buying
Power", the CACI company report that people residing within the Fenton zfp
code area have an average of 15 percent greater capacity to purchase goods
in every retail category than the U.S. average.
If Fenton wishes to maintain their current per capita amount of retail
acreage, they will have to add 47 acres of commercial development ~etwen
1987 and 2010 (Table 27.)
An additional 73 acres of commercial land will be needed to meet the demand
of the growing population in the Fenton area. If the e1ty desires to
improve their position as a regional retail center. they have a good

• 67 •

�opportunity to meet regional retail needs within the t1t;
happen if commercial areas in Fenton can meet or e~ceed tile
comercia1 areas outside the city. The c1t1 should p1M for 1
50 acres of additional commercial land by 2010
Table 27
C011111ercia1 Acreage Needs
1987

Acres

179

188

Existing
Acres
Fenton

Needed
1992

221

Surround1ng 1
Connunitfes
TOTAL
1 surrounding comunitfes iftcll:lde Fenton -,.
Village of Holly, Rose Twp •• and Tyrone
2 TWJ&gt;.
Value was calculated using Fentoft's 1987 per
Source.

The WBD.C I o.up

■

�X. INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS
A Past Developa1ent Treads

on a land use survey conducted for
92 acres 1ft 1ndustrta1 cleve ..-nt.

Based
!Md

acreage was de¥el oped i the Fwtt» /U1+-~ ,cttt
the
-23 Freeway interchange 1t

u.s

development surrounding the central bat ness d1'~H~P!l~'T'
withe few scattered s tes found hroug

The existing land use survey coflducttd
reve-a ls •n ovem l nc.rea.se
1974 fbfs fncreas-e appu s 1
develnpnent in Fu on
1,acntne

in

ndt&amp;S:trf

aver;aged lf)Pll'C:JdN e1,y Ji

ac

�Fenton has good freeway access with three interchanges on U.S. 23, and I-75
being located approximately 10 miles east of the city.
Bishop airport in Flint is Fenton's closest airport.
It provides
commercial passenger travel and an air freight facility. The Detroit
Metropolitan airport located in Romulus is about an hour and a half driving
time south of Fenton.
Access to the CSX railroad, which is connected to the statewide rail system
is located nearby.
According to a 1986 survey of 11 Genesee County industrial parks, reported
in the May 1987 Flint-Genesee Corporation newsletter, the Fenton U.S. 23
Industrial Park recorded the most growth for the period 1976 to 1986 (see
Table 10 for complete survey results). It dropped from 124 to 40 acres of
uncommitted land from 1976 to 1986. The survey also indicated that there
were 54 remaining available acres combined within the Fenton U.S. 23 and
Fenway Industrial Parks.
Two independent studies have identified the Blinton
is a part, as offering the best opportunities
development within Genesee County. The Blinton area
the triangular area formed by Flint, Grand Blanc, and

area, of which Fenton
for future economic
is broadly defined as
Fenton.

The "Evaluation of Development Potential for Metropolitan Flint Michigan
report prepared by Northwestern-CUED Institute reconnends that economic
development efforts be focused on the Blinton area, and that the attract1en
of producer services should be encouraged. The report also 1ndicat•s that
successful leveraging of Bishop Airport will be the key to future eeu--••~
development.

ay

reconaeads t
Fenton serve primarily as a residential area in support of eCCti!ttl'li'i c
develo.,memt ~1t~in t~e 111~ton aNa
Thty n
hawe,er d 9Jl te the
Fenton u.s 23 and Fenway tndwstria1 Pa~is as a cent 1.Uing deve a,1111J1t
area
The Blinton Plan (draft June 21. 19.88) prepared

Sasakf

�C. Strengths and Weaknesses
Fenton's strengths in attracting industry are largely based on quality of
life and locational factors. A complete list of strengths are listed
below:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Quality of life
Good address
Small town
Good housing conditions
Historic character
Has independent image (not tied to Flint}
Property is generally appreciating faster than the rest of the county.
Can serve multiple markets
Good population base from which to draw employees, including cities of
Fenton, Flint, and Holly
• Closeness of Bishop Airport (20 minutes}
• Industrial land is available within industrial parks
• No competing industrial parks in southern Genesee County
• Flint foreign trade zone
• Effective city planning and zoning
millage passed in 1987 to fund improvements to Bishop Airport
should further enhance economic development efforts. Planned improvements
include: the addition of corporate hangars, an air freight facility,
passenger terminal expansion, and increased auto parking. Businesses whiett
require these services may now consider locating in Fenton.

A

Weaknesses in attractfng industrial business to Fenton include
• Labor union influence
• Li•ited size

Envfr0111111ent11 limitations within industrial Pl ks
• Poor design at US 23 interchanges
,,rat on af Ftmtim tt S ! 1nd fnvay

�The image and the quality of the industrial parks are being omt~• se4
by the introduction of general commercial uses which ar• 1nco,npat1
with industrial businesses.
• Poor entry image at both industrial parks

•

The first three weaknesses will be difficult to influence. however. the
final three can be corrected with proper planning and available f1n1nc1ng

o.

Future Acreage Need

Fenton is currently providing the only industrial park space in southern
Genesee County. If Fenton is to continue in the role as a regtont
industry provider, their future acreage need must be based
t
anticipated population growth not only of Fenton, bu:t of the surroutiading
communities as well.
Table 28 projects future industrial acreage Med for oth Fent
surrounding comunities. Acreage need was catculated by aJply !I Pefl Oil
current industrial per capita acreage against futur&amp; pepu1at on f eruses
Table 28
Industrial Acreage Need
1987
Existing
Acres

Fenton
SUM'OUn.diAf
C01111111n •s

Nm

105

Acres

Acres

1992

2010

Needed

110

*H~
132

M

k

IJ

�acres should be a1loeated if the city wishes to antinue t&amp;
regional industrial base. It 1s important to note that
are base on maintaining the same per capita 1ndustrila1- 'lttril
future. If the existing quarrtfty of 1ndustri« y dfV,e
considered less than fs desired for the cul'"rent popu tt ••
acreage would be needed in the future
Assuming that Fenton will continue to be the regional
Fenton's long tenn industrial land needs are for 150
land.
DeChiara and Koppelman's book •urban P1anntng
accepted source of standards in the ptanm1ng
sufficient industrial land for 50 years 1ntn
straight line projection of three acres pe~ ,-ar
acres needed based on 2010 project1on) F
industrial land by 2037 ttte,re 1s currently
vacant land remtining 1n Fentort~-s- two nd str
general development plan
Addi
al
needed for streets and portions w1
Given this long te
need ft is 1:tffPO
bufldable land left in
fndU

at:r'ft

amt
fte "Nit
tfie f un:,
(eve~

of

�XI. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
This section of the plan will prmde an
and include the following
wa1e:r •11
schools, and government buf dfng
current condition and need for i
connunfty facilities are shown. 1n F pre
A. Water System
Fenton draws their wat,r supply frM •11s locat:ed
ra1 l road tracks and west of North Road. Tile
tar
water treatment plant at the s.gie ttitt.rl loca:t1®
pumped to a 1,000,000 gallon storage tank le
1
on Denton Hill. Present1y the city 1s on '1 at
water per day (gpd) out of a c•paci ty of 3 2 11 :1 ~....,~n.:1111
c-,acfty The city averages 98 PQUft~S
which 1s high by conauon standards
h:as the ava11a~111ty of public watt,
appear to offer any defflopma11 lfJNt·flo&amp;t!·'kln

•maJ

�CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
P!INTON_, MICHIGAN
(

COMMUNITY Mctt.t'ltD

]

.......
---- ---

�Phase 3 involves the replacement of all watermains which are less than 4
inches in diameter (23,800 linear feet). This action was requested by lie
Michigan Department of Health due to concern over efficient water
transmission and fire protection. Their current nt1nfmutn stanh"NI
water main is 6 inches. In addition 22,000 feet of 4 inch water•·$ t
to be replaced. Phase 3 improvements totalling $275,000 of the tota1
$2,100,000 will be completed in 1988.
Phase 4 includes tapping the Westwood Subdivision fnto a 12 fnch •
This improvement is estimated to cost $15,000.

n

The city is also exploring the need for additional water storage whioh
would become phase 5. No cost estimates have been prepared.

B. Sanitary Sewer System
The City of Fenton is part of the Genesee County Sanitary Sewer Oisttict
No. 3, which treats sanitary sewage for the communities ef Fenton, f°fltOfti
Township, and Linden. The county's treatment plant, built fn 1J6S, bas
undergone several additions to increase capacity over the last 20 years
The city is responsible for maintenance of the co11ectf0ft st• eafi.:n
the treatment plant.
As Of July 6 • 1988 the dty hid pU'rehased 4.'J'',6P.'91111!'1¥1:l'Mltll

trRtment plant (I unit 1~ equ1va1ent to
90 gallons of •ater Pl!1'" capita pet"

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

I
I

Many areas of Fenton have sewer lines which are 80 years of age or older.
As expected a large number of these lines are in need of repair. The city
retained the Hycon Construction System Corporation of Clifton, New York in
1983 to conduct a survey of the physical condition of the sewer system.
A
significant infiltration problem was expected.
The survey identified the following deficiencies:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Protruding house connections
Cracked, broken and or crushed pipe
Deposits in joints
Offset and wide joints
Roots
Dips and bends in the lines
Pipe changing sizes between manholes

Cleaning
1983.

of

the

lines

and

joint repair for the system was completed in

The city, based on the findings of the Hycon study,
classification priority rating system as follows:

established

a four

Priority #1 - Critical - These areas of sanitary sewers are rated critical
because of the amount of city residents they service or the severity of the
damage to the pipes involved. These areas must be replaced to get our
system running smoothly. If any of these fail, the city will have a major
expense and lack of sewer services for sometime within areas of the city.
Priority #2 - Essential - Are areas of the city which are essential to keep
the city collection system in good working order.
Without these repairs
the city will face the problem of large expenses for repairs in the near
future.

- 77 -

�Priority #3 - Necessary - Areas in which the city has found broken pipes,
protruding connections, dips in pipes etc •• They are necessary to continue
a good collection system without too many disruptions.
Priority #4 - Replacement of all 6 inch sewer lines with 8 inch lines for
more capacity and to eliminate possible trouble areas.
The cost to implement the needed repairs contained in the above pr ority
classifications is $2,245,641. and includes 27,579 linear feet of sewer
line replacement.
The city has programmed $278,495. for 2,835 feet of sewer line replacement
in its 1988 budget. All of these improvements are priority #1
improvements. It is the city's intention to complete all priority #1
improvements before any priority #2 projects are initiated. (Consult the
1988 City of Fenton Capital Improvement Program for more detailed project
information.)
C. Capital Improvement Plan
The City of Fenton created a Capital Improvement Project Fund in 1980, thus
guaranteeing for the first time monies for infrastructure improvements
The city assesses 1.5 mils for this purpose. The city uses a five year
time frame for its capital improvement schedule, which ft updates om an
annual basis. A cap1ta1 improvement project is a major expend1tuni whfGl.b
will improve the physical plant of the city. The impro
of
a non-recurring nature and/or of long tenn benefit a

• Street construction/reconstruction
• Aequis1tfon of land
• Bui1d1ng construction
M1jor fac111ty improvements

Storm sewers

�The city has categorized the proposed capital improvements for the next
five years into four areas of concentration: streets, storm drainage,
major facility improvements and contingencies. A short discussion of need
within these areas is contained below.
Streets
Resurfacing of streets has and will continue to be a major expenditure
within the capital improvement project fund. The city has 41 miles of
streets and due to their age and condition, will need repair. Currently
the city is within a few years of resurfacing most streets within the city,
however, this activity is expected to be ongoing because of long time
period required to go through a resurfacing cycle. The city will also
concentrate on new street construction such as the widening of North Leroy
and the paving of the remaining unsurfaced streets.
Storm Drainage
A major problem in the city and therefore an area of concern for the
capital improvement program to address is storm water drainage. Large
segments of the city have either inadequate storm drainage or none at all.
At a minimum this causes unnecessary road maintenance and more seriousti
may create continual flooding problems for area residents.
Major Facility Improvements
This category entails one time projects. such as the Federel .Aid to
Systems Silver Lake Road project, which llll.Y be funded throwtb spect~
programs. Priority for these projects will have t
1
funding against the importance of other

1mplem:entat1on in a given year

�Contingencies
An important consideration of any well maneged fiffafl;tjia

p11n sb

reasonable fund balance front one year to the next. Th cS -.nsfim¥n•
be available for an~ unexpected project that uy dueloe 11be
is to carry an annual minimum fund balance of $13,000.
Projects proposed on the 1988-1992 capital 1•provenHmt $Chec'.hlli
most part include: street resurfacing, 1nsta!laticm of c1rh alild tlilffl
intersection improvements, and new storm sewer construction. E:sl
cost for these projects is $548,786. {Consult 1988 Cfty of f,enton ca,
Improvement Program for more detail on proposed prc)jects).

D

Public Schools

Schools within the City of Fenton are part of' the f;enitten Ar-et Puhl
Schools District
This district covers 35 s~u•re m11H
and -has a total enr-01 lntent of uv•r 2 7Qt ~
schmol build ngs a.re all located
th
h
maae ity- of tudent
he a
d the Ftntefl Area Pub
transported to their school on distr ct•-..ed bu
~ h..i~_.
ea: school bu11d119 ts d1scuued bl aw

�Fenton Middle School
The middle school untf1 recently served the 7th and Ith
portion of the building is being reftovated to 111a e ~
the 6th grade. This change will correspondtft01Y lllWlr
at each of the districts elementary sci'too]s lnro 1~
expected to be around 550 students Additional capacity d itbe ffllill
st111 be available as the second story wf11 not be in use
expansion plans are being considered at this t1me.
North Road Elementary
This school serves kindergarten through 5th gnadt.
about 450 students with a capacity of 500 De bu 1
sound and there are no plans for expansian

State Road Elementary
serves k nde;rgarten tttvougih
tbout 450, wi tb cap,c y of SQQ
11
tnere ,re. no Jlans fG

This

school

~

h gndt.
q 1&amp;

�The classes offered at the Center have been assimilated bact fn~
schools. No definitive plans for the building. or for relocn
made.

E Public Buildings

The following public buildings have been asse$sed as to I e
ability to meet the spatial needs for which they are intended
shown in Figure 14.
City Hall
The city hall located on South Leroy at the Mill Pond was oOl'tstruet
1976. Its location within the central business district makes
accessible to the city's residents. Prese~tly ft 1s
intended services. The building, a one stor,.v str
so that a second story could be added sho~ld the"
The building fs fo very good condftfon end there
expansion.

Police Station
The police station. censtructed A 1971 s
city hall The facflitJ is 1n tood t'Oftd1t1a

being met -n~ there
l&gt;w ld t ill~•

�I
I
I
I

I
I

I

I
I
I
I

I

'

The fire chief has indicated a need for one additional station within the
next five year period. This facility should contain 2 bays capable of
holding 4 trucks, 2 sets of doors for easy entrance and exit, meeting room,
and training room. The Owen Road/Shiawassee area has been targeted for the
new station because of rapid growth targeted in the western part of the
city. If Fenton continues with a steady growth rate, a third station would
be required within a 5 to 20 year period. This station should contain 2
bays to hold 2 trucks, an office, and small meeting room.
This station is being planned for the North and Leroy area. From this
location service to the northern part of the city could be provided without
the threat of train delay.
Fenton also supplies fire service to Tyrone Township, encompassing 36
square miles.
All service is presently provided from the Fenton Station.
If growth and the demand for fire services increases substantially in
Tyrone Township, a station may also be needed withih the Township. If this
were to happen, the building would be built by the Township and Fenton
would supply the staff and equipment.

Community Center
The community center is located on South Leroy adjacent to the Fenton
Square Ma11.
The center is commonly used for classes, meetings, and
wedding receptions.
It also provides a location for senior citizen
activities including travel, hot lunches, and card playing.
The building was built in 1937 and is in very good condition. Recent
improvements
to the building have included:
repainting, new light
fixtures, and a new sprinkler system for the grounds. Improvements to make
the building accessible to the handicapped are currently underway.
There
are no plans to expand the facility in the foreseeable future.

- 83 -

�A.J. Phillips Library
The library is part of the Genesee District
the building. but the Genesee
1
i
staff
The building WIS CMStrocQal n
There 1s not an identified need for adlditiGnt1 .,Males
there are no expansion plans for the present fac11 ty

Fenton Museum
The mwseum is currently housed
bufldfng The building is an h storic e\f'-llg..,.1h•e
building is structurally sound, attd there are no
the facility
DPW Garage
The garage 1s locetecl on L1neo1:n •t ffi'e
the build ng it not kn&lt;Mn, b
t

was not d s1gned for t
Hmitat 01s
Nin enanee
1

i!lll''NIIIFt.. u 1Hm151

�F. Parks
inventory of all ~it9 parks is ava11e1e
Master Plan. This plan 11sts all
all proposed future improvements

An

�XII. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The City of Fenton General Development Plan is shown in Figure 15. A
description of the intent for the districts shown on the Plan map is given
below.
Urban Core Residential
This district is intended primarily for single family residential
development. Existing homes within the district were built in the early
stages of Fenton's development as a city. The grid system subdivision
design and small urban lots are typical. Current density ranges from 2.6
units to 4.5 units per acre.
This district also contains a large number of architecturally significant
homes.
Future development is oriented to single family detached homes consistent
with the current density. Housing density should not exceed 4.5 units per
acre.
Conversion of large single family homes to multiple family
structures may be acceptable if appropriate zoning standards are
established and enforced.
This district is intended to recognize and maintain the older established
residential areas of the city which were developed with a consistent lot
size and development pattern. This district furthers the goal to provide
for a variety of housing types and values. The areas chosen for inclusion
in this district were based largely on existing development patterns
very Low Density Residential (Estate Residential)
This district is fntended for single family residenti1 d
large lots
Existing hous ng density is typically les
an
acre Future res dential development within this d s
exceed 2 units per acre

��This development pattern, in addition to broadening the
opportunities, is being us,ed to address environmeftal rz,• ~••n•• -.-.
southern portion of the city. Much of the l1nd -1 n
development limitations due to wetlands ant poo~ soil •
lots 1n this area allows better portions of ._ lot ,
development of a home while leaving less develo,ab e '9rtf
open space. This development density also offers nN..,.••tt •-~~--.preserve the mature woodlots that are fo~nd 1n this
The areas chosen for inclusion in this district were based
existing very low density housing and adj•cent .affe
features which would be an aesthetic eln fl~ es uer
environmental factors such as wetlands and pOlr s'011s
di
lot develofJlllent approach.
Low Density Residential

This district 1s tntended for extlusi,e s aig
development. Existing densftfes Within this d1stri~t r
fr•
per acre to 5 5 units per acre. Reeonrnended 4efts1t;r fv M
fs 2 to 4 un1ts per ere This district
eons den
t~ provide a ¥ar1ety of housing type tlld

�Areas chosen for inclusion in this district were selected for their
benefits in preserving natural features. Much of the land area within thts
district is comprised of floodplain, wetlands, poor soils, and woodlots A
density of 6 units per acre offers more opportunity to cluster housing and
thereby retain more natural features within open space. This density •lso
makes development within these restricted areas more economically feasi~la.
High Density Residential
This district is intended for multiple family residential deve1oprnent ,Wlfth
a density of 6 or more units per acre. This district would also be
acceptable for a manufactured housing park. This district is also part of
the plan goal to provide for a variety of housing types and values.
Areas designated as high density residential were selected based primarily
on existing high density development; close proximity to U.S. 23; low
impacts to Fenton streets; and soil conditions suitable for this
development type.
Industrial Park
This district is intended for general light industrial development
location of this district was detenn1ned by the existing leca
Fenton's industrial parks and to provide for a iuture an, t
150 acres of industrial land

Shore1in! Conservattpn
This dfstrjct is intended for the
wtth t

�The areas within this district were determined based on the fixed

location

of the Shiawassee River.
Planned Unit Residential Development
This district has been shown on the map as an overlay district. This
district is intended to highlight areas within the city in which developers
should be encouraged to use the planned unit development concept.
If the
PUD is not chosen the intent of the underlying district would apply.
The purpose of a PUD is to encourage innovation and flexibility in design
for residential development. A mixture of housing types are permitted as
long as they meet general design standards which would be included in the
zoning ordinance. This development district is particularly useful in
areas which are difficult to develop under conventional zoning regulations
due to environnental and other physical constraints. It is primarily for
this reason that this overlay district has been established.
A limited amount

of neighborhood commercial business would be acceptable

within the PUD concept.
Planned Mixed Use Development
The intent of this district is to encourage innovation and flexibility in
design for a mixed use development. This district recognizes that certain
combinations of residential, commercial, and industrial uses can
successfully be mixed within one development plan given specific design
standards. Such developments typically look less rigid and are
aesthetically more pleasing than developments built under the confines of
specific use zones.
This district was delineated as such because it maximizes development
opportunities for a site which is equally well suited to a variety of uses.

- 90 -

�General Commercial
This district is intended for the widest variety of retafl and service
businesses. Businesses could range from apparel shops, auto service, affll
restaurants through small commercial strip centers.
Locations for this district are based on collector or arterial frontage,
low impact to Fenton streets; existing commercial developments of as milar
type; and compatibility to adjacent uses.
Office/Service Conrnercial
This district is intended for low intensity co11111ercial uses. It 1s
designed specifically to be used along North Leroy just north of the CBD 1
where a transition of single family homes to comercial uses is occurr1dg.
This district will allow the use of single family homes for business
purposes, while minimizing negative impacts on traffic volumes and adjacent
single family homes. Businesses could include: medical office financial
office, personal services, and similar uses.
Highway Commercial
This district is intended to serve the commercial needs of the motor Ill
public Typical uses fn this district would include motels dr e-~•.,,_restaurants, and auto servie~ establfstaents

The location of this district is la'te1y d ctatd
interchanges

�This district is being shown as extending further south and east than the
existing Fenton Square because of a general need for more commercial
expansion in the city. Fenton Square has been chosen for expansion because
a number of studies as well as recent interviews with Fenton Square
business people have identified a need for a better business mix. This
cannot be satisfactorily resolved without the addition of new stores.
The area east of the Square contains an area of marginal housing which is
in a state of transition and is a logical choice for low cost expansion.
The area south of the Square was selected to create commercial uses along
the Mill Pond and make a physical connection to the government center and
its adjoining recreational uses.

- 92 -

�XIII.

ISSUES, GOALS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following issues, goals, and recommendations have been developed to set a
framework for the implementation of the Fenton Comprehensive Plan. They have
been developed based on the numerous studies conducted for the plan,
interviews with city officials, county planners, Fenton business owners, and
Fenton residents. The issues presented in this section generally correspond
to the major components of the plan which include: transportation, land use,
housing, commerce, industry, community facilities, and future land use.
The following definitions will
section:

provide a better understanding of this

Issues
An issue is a statement of a problem, a situation for which corrective action
is recommended.
Goals
A goal statement identifies what is to be accomplished
issue.

pursuant to each

Recommendations
Are specific actions which should be taken to achieve goals. Also
identified in the recommendations section are major resources which will be
involved, time frame, and party responsible for implementation.
Each project will be prioritized as either a short or long range project
Short range projects are those which ideally should be completed between
1988 and 1995; and long range those to be completed between 1995 and 2001

�A.
I.

Transportation
ISSUE:
Presently Fenton does not have
north-south routing through the city.
GOAL:

well

defined

Improve north-south routing through the city.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. Recognize Adelaide as the primary north-south route
through Fenton. The intersections at North Street,
Silver Lake Road, and North Leroy should be improved to
enhance traffic flow along Adelaide. That could include
changes to both
intersection
geometrics
and
signalization.
Time frame: short range
Implementation:

City of Fenton

B. Access management should be employed along North Leroy
to control
the number, design, and placement of
driveways, thereby preserving the street's capacity as
property (re)develops.
Time Frame: short range
Implementation: Planning Commission

2.

ISSUE: The city's two industrial parks, though adjacent,
lack a desired road connection.
Construct a public road to connect the U.S. 23 and
Fenway Industrial Parks and provide a connector route
between Silver Lake Road and OWen Road.

GOAL:

- 94 -

�RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Connect Alloy Drive within the industrial parks. The
city has already acquired right-of-way for this purpose
making it the most cost effective connection. This
connection also permits truck traffic to enter and exit
the parks in close proximity to the Owen Road/U.S. 23
interchange.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton
This
Drive north to Fenway Drive.
connection is recommended even if the Alloy connection
is made because it better serves the function of an
intra-city connector route. The Steel Drive connection
would also include modification of the intersection with
Alloy Drive to favor traffic on Steel, constructing a
"signature entrance" and possibly a center turn lane
along Owen Road at the entrance.

B. Extend Steel

Time Frame: Short to Long Range
Implementation: Industrial Park Developers, and City of
Fenton
ISSUE: Downtown circulation is circuitous, confusing. and
inefficient.

GOAL. Improve the efffciency and design of the do town
circulation system
RECOMMENDATIONS

A Connect Silver Lake Road
traff c conge t1on
h r
Leroy
ee
g
t

h

in

�and associated improvements). This would require
acquisition of right-of-way and the cooperation of the
CSX Corporation to allow an additional crossing of the
rail line.
The precise alignment and design of this project would
require
detailed engineering studies addressing
horizontal and vertical grades, design speeds through
curves, the need for preemptive traffic signals
electronically linked to rail crossing gates, impact on
adjacent properties, and cost estimates etc.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation:
B.

City of Fenton, CSX Railroad

Install an exclusive left turn lane along Silver Lake
Road, from South Leroy Street through the intersection
with North Leroy. This may require right-of-way
acquisition.
Time Frame: Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

C.

Close First Street east of North Leroy to reduce traffic
conflicts and provide additional parking for the Fenton
Hotel and other nearby businesses This improvement
would also include increasing the radius at Main and
North Leroy to allow trucks turning right onto Main from
North Leroy to successfully navigate the turn.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation C ty of Fenton

�--

0

I

fiw

I

I
I
I

-J ,,_ - ·--

'/

/

I I

I

,'

/

ti

I

,' I
I

I

,

0
0
1-

a:

I

I

z
z

w
w

I

I

I

I

/

z

1

z

I

:c

l

.::-;' " -

---- ----

0
0

N
I

~

w

..I

~

en

�D.

Remove the short east-west connection between Roberts
and Silver Lake Road (just west of South Leroy Street)
thereby forcing traffic to use the 90-degree
intersection.
This improvement should not be
implemented until the Silver Lake/Adelaide intersection
is improved.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

E.

Redesign the entrances to Fenton Square to reduce
congestion and confusion. This recommendation includes
the following actions:
•

The north entrance should provide separate stacking
room for vehicles exiting at the intersection through
installation of curbing.

•

The west entrance (Caroline) should be redesigned to
make it more visible, parking near that access should
be eliminated, the access should be extended east to
the center of Fenton Square and landscaping should be
provided along South Leroy Street between Silver
Lake Road and the Community Center.

•

The southern entrance should be redesigned to promote
it as an access into Fenton Square and signify South
Leroy as the through route. A new sign, curbing,
brick pavers, and landscaping are needed at the
entrance.
The project would also require some
modifications to South Leroy at this location which
would include smoothing out the curvature in the road
by the Community Center.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Fenton Square
- 98 -

�F.

Vacate Walnut or Pine Streets to allow expansion of
Fenton Square and its parking areas. As single family
housing conditions along Walnut and Pine decline, these
areas should be redeveloped as part of Fenton Square.
Fenton Square is currently restricted in their efforts
to create a successful business mix by a lack of room
for new stores. As this redevelopment occurs there will
not be a need to maintain both Walnut and Pine as public
streets. Portions of these streets could be vacated and
become part of Fenton Square. A final design decision
regarding these
streets should only be made in
conjunction with a long range master plan for Fenton
Square.
Time Frame: Long Range to Very Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Fenton Square

4.

ISSUE: Poor traffic operations
interchange ramps.

at

the Owen Road/U.S. 23

GOAL: Improve interchange design and traffic controls.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Install traffic signals at ramp terminals.
This would
involve approvals from the Michigan Department of
Transportation (MOOT), under guidelines of the Federal
Highway Administration (FHA).
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, MOOT, and FHA

B.

Relocate ramps to current accepted standard design
distance from bridge, or reconstruct bridge with lower
crown and four lane cross section, to improve motorist
sight distance.
- 99 -

�Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, MOOT, and FHA
5.

ISSUE: There are sight difficulties at the Torrey Road/South
Long Lake intersection. The problem intensifies at
night when some motorists confuse northbound U.S. 23
traffic with northbound Torrey Road.
GOAL: Improve sight visibility and eliminate confusion over
traffic patterns.
REC01MENDATIO S:
A.

Lower bridge railing along Torrey Road.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implemen ation: City of Fenton

B.

Plant landscaping along the west side of Torrey Road so
that motorists on South Long Lake Road can more easily
distinguish vehicles on U.S. 23 from those -0n Torrey
Road.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

c.

Consider installation of a blinking red/amber light at
the intersection to alert motorists of intersection
location.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton
- 100 -

�6.

ISSUE: There is a history of traffic operation problems and
accidents at all rail crossings.
GOAL: Improve traffic safety at all rail crossings.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Install rail crossing gates at
Adelaide.
Time Frame:

Leroy and

possibly at

Short to Long Range

Implementation: City of Fenton, CSX Railroad, and MOOT
7.

ISSUE: Several
capacity

streets are

currently at

or approaching

GOAL: Increase roadway capacity through improvements such as
widening streets and redesign of intersections.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Widen Owen Road, from Jennings to Shiawassee, to three
or four lanes, with turning lanes at major intersections
as development warrants.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

B.

Widen Silver Lake Road, from the west city limits
through the Adelaide intersection, to four lanes, with
turning lanes at major intersections as development
warrants.
Time Frame: Widen at
Remainder - Long Range

Adelaide

- 101 -

- Short Range;

�Implementation: City of Fenton and MOOT
C.

Widen North Road, from Leroy to Adelaide, to four lanes;
and/or redesign the intersection with Adelaide to
enhance north-south travel along Adelaide (including
left turn lanes and possible signalization).
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

D.

Widen Main Street, from the proposed intersection with
Silver Lake Road to the east city limits, to four lanes
with turn lanes at major intersections.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

E.

Widen Adelaide, from North Street to Shiawassee, to four
lanes.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

F.

Cul-de-sac Round Street north of the OWen/Shiawassee
intersection to reduce vehicle trips through the
intersection and to reduce the potential for traffic
conflicts caused by the intersection I s limited sight
distance and poor design. This recommendation should
only be implemented if Grant Street can be extended west
to Steel Drive. This extension would provide access for
the industrial uses along Grant Street through the
industrial park rather than impact homes along Grant
east of Round. The city should encourage the Grant
Street connection to Steel Drive.

- 102 -

�Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton
G.

Redesign traffic control at the Leroy and Shiawassee
intersection with a full traffic signal, and move stop
bars for northbound traffic to the north to provide
better visibility. Curb extensions should be considered
to improve safety for pedestrians crossing the streets.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, MOOT

H.

Construct a left turn lane on Silver Lake Road at
Adelaide. This could require relocating parking areas
for two businesses at the corners.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, MOOT

a.

ISSUE: New collector streets should be planned for large
undeveloped areas which may undergo development fn the
near future.
GOAL: Identify general alignment fer co11eetor s
w111 be needed in tflte futurf!

RECOMMENDAT:IONS.
A
f
be ttie primary access

11¥er
Raid
df raeted away ff'!

�Time Frame: Short to Long Range, should be in pace with
development of the area.
Implementation: City of Fenton, Private Developers
B. Construction of a collector street in the city's
northeast section as development occurs. This route
could link Eddy Lake Road with North Lemen, connect the
gap in Lemen, and thereby provide alternative routing to
Leroy and Main Streets. The city could consider
"precisely platting" the alignment.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Private Developers

C. Acquire Gravel Pit Road for a future collector. This
road would open up land south of w. Shiawassee to the
city limits for future residential development. If
acquired, the road should be repaved.
Time Frame: Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton
9.

ISSUE: There are insufficient access management guidelines
contained within the zoning ordinance to help preserve
roadway capacity through regulation rather than street
widening.
GOAL: Improve traffic operat1mns and preserve £IP£
through the development and adoption of access
management guidelines

�•

RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

•

Adopt access management guidelines in the Fenton Zoning
Ordinance which give specifics for driveway placement,
intersections, and parking design standards etc •
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

10.

ISSUE: There
system.

is

not

an

officially adopted bicycle path

GOAL: Improve routing for bicycles by establishing and
adopting an official bicycle path system.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Implementation of the city's 1984 "Bicycle Route
Evaluation"
study
recommendations,
which
include
construction of exclusive bike lanes or bike paths
along:
•

Adelaide Street from North Road to South Holly Road.

•

North Road from North Leroy to Poplar Street.

•

Silver Lake Road from Adelaide to Jennings Road.

•

Shiawassee Street from Donaldson to Adelaide and
possibly onto the library and gazebo area (extended
from the previous study).

•

Installation of signage to designate certain streets
as bicycle routes, as noted in the previous study.

•

bike
Where
possible,
incorporated along the

path segments could be
proposed Shiawasee River

- 105 -

�Corridor pedestrian linkage syst:elll. ~ t
other bike routes would be proviaed Whete fna,e11,~,.
Time Frame: Long Range
Imp1ementat 1on : City of Fenton

B. Land Use
1.

ISSUE: Screening techniques betweeo
uses and residential areas
GOAL:

Provide for adequate screeni~Jlbuff•rfng: betea
industrial

or

commerch1

11sn -t.li

resident al areas
RECOMffDATIOJtS:
The location of an industrial or
next to a resfdent al 4istr1ct in
possible
the general
are recOlllllelded

~

,n

a1 d

�Time Frame:

Imp1ementation:
2.

City of Fenton

ISSUE:

There are several cases and trends of land use
conflicts or incompatibility throughout the city.

GOAL:

Eliminate or minimize impacts of existing land use
conflicts and prevent new conflicts from occurring
through sound planning and zoning.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A.

•

•

Short Range

Encourage those businesses which have been identified as
land use conflicts (identified in existing land use
section of the plan) to use screening or other aesthetic
measures to mitigate their impact on
surrounding
development.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, private property owners

B.

Encourage the relocation of Expanded Plastics and
redevelopment of the site. This may involve purchase of
the building, offering of tax abatement on a more
suitable site, or other relocation assistance.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

C.

Pursue a course of action which will eventually
eliminate all serious land use conflicts within the
city.
This would involve rezoning parcels for a more

- 107 -

�■
■

•

compatible use, so that such uses will not be allowed to
expand,
and establishing zoning requirements which
restrict
the expansion
or
reconstruction
of a
non-conforming use.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

D.

Do not allow any commercial zoning or uses within the
Fenway or U.S. 23 industrial parks except for small
parcels fronting on Silver Lake Road at Alloy Drive.
Current commercial zoning within the industrial area
should be removed, which will
involve a zoning
amendment. This land use planning strategy is important
for the following reasons:
•

Commercial uses are incompatible with industrial uses
within an industrial park setting. The commercial
uses
compromise the industrial image which is
important
for
attracting new industry and the
creation of future permanent jobs in the city.

•

The remaining vacant land within the industrial parks
is
needed to satisfy the projected long range
industrial land needs of Fenton. This plan projects
a long term need of 150 acres. Presently, there are
only 140 buildable acres remaining in the industrial
parks.

P

~

Industrial uses will generate considerably less
traffic in the area, thus reducing traffic congestion
impact on Silver Lake and Owen Roads.
Aesthetically. industrial uses will be less offensive
than the commercial activities.
Commercial uses
depend to a large extent on extensive signage to
attract Cl1stomers.
- 108 -

�•

The industrial area, located adjacent to U.S. 23
freeway (between three interchanges) is an ideal
location for
potential
industrial
development.
Improved sites, ready access to the freeway system
and excellent visibility are only a few of the assets
of this location.

•

Some of the concerns with the development of
commercial uses in this area include the eventual
conflict of commercial and industrial traffic, the
poor access to the commercial uses along Alloy and
the mixing of commercial and industrial uses which
creates considerable congestion for both uses.

•

The city has ample commercial areas available for
development.
Therefore, infringing on the prime
industrial area of the city is not warranted.

Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

E.

Do not allow further encroachment of commercial uses
into the residential strip along Silver Lake Road
between Adelaide
and
Ponchartrain.
This can be
acco~plished through appropriate master planning and
zoning.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

F.

The intrusion of commercial uses into the residential
area along North Leroy just north of the CBD should be
contained and not be allowed to connect to the
commercial district further north.
This
can
be
accomplished through appropriate master planning and
zoning.
- 109 -

�Time Frame: Short Range

Implementation: City of Fenton. Planning O)atal s

3.

ISSUE: North Leroy has a negatiye streetse1pe tmaeter
GOAL: Make improvements and set standards wftfcll i1
the character alon9 North Lerqy end other
tho~oughfares fn the ~fty

RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. Create strict zoning requirements for d
parking •nd. b~11d 19)
sf...,,.p
a.I

Landscaping rec\fu reme
and interior landscap n1
Time Frame: Short Range

B

�■

■

Time Frame: Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, private property owners
C.
1.

Natural Features
ISSUE: Adverse development
sensitive areas.

impacts

on

environmentally

GOAL: Maximize the preservation of unique and valuable
natural resources from the impacts of development.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Through zoning and flood plain ordinances restrict and
manage development within the shoreline conservation
district
and other flood plain and wetland areas
throughout the city.

8.

Use the natural features information in this plan during
site plan review. Knowing if there are environmentally
sensitive areas within a site being reviewed will allow
the planning commission to evaluate whether the proposed
plan maximizes preservation of natural features.

C.

Encourage the planned unit development concept in areas
so designated on the general development plan (Figure
15). This will give the planning commission increased
control in ensuring environmental preservation.

D.

Enforce compliance with the Goemare-Anderson Wetland
Protection Act (Act 203, 1979).

E.

Initiate a street tree management program. The focus of
this program would be tree regeneration.
This action
will prevent a particular block(s) from being clearcut
due to all trees reaching mature age at the same time.
- 111 -

�F.

Consider purchasing environmentally sensitive areas for
future passive park lands.

G.

Acquire or obtain easement rights for a trail system
along the entire length of the Shiawassee River and Mill
Pond
Time Frame: A through G, Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

D.
1.

Housing
ISSUE: Balancing the mix of multiple and
housing.

single family

GOAL: Allow a mixture of both housing types, but retain a
strong single family orientation.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Fenton should not establish a ratio standard to achieve
a proper balance between multiple and single family
development, but rather should manage multiple family
development through the allocation of land at
appropriate sites. This is accomplished through
planning and zoning.
Time Frame: Short Range

2.

Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Comissfon
ISSUE: Conversion of large single family homes into mult ple
family units.

Pennft the conversion of single family homes on a
11m ted bass with strict controls

GOAL.

- 112 •

�RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Conversions should only be permitted under a special use
permit process. Standards should be set up which would
have to be met before the conversion would be approved;
for example the number of units could be limited to 2 or
3
units per home, a minimum unit size could be
established, on-site screened parking could be required,
or converted units could be limited to no more than 20
percent of the homes on a block. The city may want to
consider conversions only within the urban core
residential district.

B. The city should consider the implementation of a rental
property maintenance code. This code would set interior
and exterior maintenance standards which would have to
be met by all rental properties. Inspectinns could be
conducted on a annual or bi-annual basis.
Time Frame: For A and B, Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

3.

ISSUE: Historic Preservation for Housing

GOAL: Encourage the establishment of historic districts and
the preservation of individual historic homes as
appropriate.
RECOMMENDATIONS:

A Any housing rehabilitation effor
ho d
priority on h storic heme
A pro ty
placed on historic res
r pub c
improvements
- 11

�Time Frame: Ongoing
Implementation: City of Fenton
4.

Housing opportunities for low/moderate income
ISSUE:
families.
GOAL: Continue to provide and improve housing opportunities
for low/moderate income families and individuals.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Provide housing in a variety of types and sizes.

B.

Focus housing and infrastructure rehabilitation efforts
in low/moderate income areas as identified in Figure 13.
Time Frame: For A and B, Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission, and
Genesee County

E. Commercial
1.

ISSUE: The Fenton Square Mall is poorly designed and lacks a
cohesive image.
GOAL: Improve the image, design, cohesiveness, and vitality
of Fenton Square.
RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. A mater plan should be pr pared to guide the future
development of Fenton Square This plan should e alua e
and make recommendation
n the
1
architecture, landscaping, on-site c rculat1on sfgnage
entry treatments unification of mall stores, and
marketing strategy
114 -

�Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Fenton Square Businesses
B.

Fenton Square should be expanded to Pine Street on the
east and to the Mill Pond on the south. The north side
of the Mill Pond should be developed commercially from
the Fire Station to East Street. A walkway should also
be built along the Mill Pond. This improvement would
require the demolition of several structures.
Time Frame: Long to very long range
Implementation: City of Fenton

F.

Industrial
Many of the improvements needed to improve the city's
industrial parks are transportation related and are addressed under
transportation recommendations.

1.

ISSUE: Zoning Requirements for the Industrial Park district.
GOAL: Establish zoning requirements which will provide a foundation
for quality industrial development and address the aesthetics of
the development as viewed from the U.S. 23 freeway.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Minimum lot size within the industrial park district should be 3
acres.

B.

A setback of at least 100 feet should be ru1ntafned along the
23 freeway.

- 115 -

�c.

Loading areas should be designed o~ s
u.s. 23 to the maximum extent possible
C can ~e achieved through Jon ng ord1M.R¢e • • • ~

T1ine Frame. Short Range
lntplementat1on. City of Fentea. Pl•~n1~g Clnlrin

G.

1.

Comunfty Faci11tfes

ISSUE: There 1s cur~ent1y ~o for1111
Fenton.

RECOMMENDATIONS.
A. Make side1111ks eligible o fuNltd
sewer c•p tal tmp ,,_,.,,. f1:md

Time Fr1111. S

rM9h Ute

�city to have their vehicle maintenance
garage for higher cost.

performed at a private

Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton. Fenton Area School District.

- 117

�XIV. IMPLEMENTATION
Major steps to be taken in implementing the C1tyi of Fent-l)ft
Plan include the following:
•
•
•
•

0.,NIIMiffa

Establish priorities for transportation ud beautlf1cattat
(Incorporate into Capital Improvement Pregram).
Begin revision of zoning ordinance and map.
Assessment of funding sources.
Action strategies for specific areas fdentfffed in plam.
- Master Plan for Fenton Square
- Detailed intersection studies/preliminary engineering
- Engineering/design for road improvements
- Revise and implement bicycle plan.
- Burying utility lines.
- Street tree management program.
- Land acquisition for park lands.

pl'1ld'81~~

�XV. RECREATION
We recommend that the 1987 City of Fenton Recreation Master Plan be
recreation component of the city's comprehensive plan. The recreation p M
has been prepared to meet the Michigan Department of Natura!~-~
guidelines and makes the city eligible to apply fo~ state •IKI fide
grants.

�•
•

XVI.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The following resources were used in the preparation of the City of Fenton
Comprehensive Plan.

Census Data, U.S. Department of Convnerce, Bureau of the Census. 1950
to 1980.
Population, Income, and Household Projections, National
Corporation, Ithaca, New York, March 1988.

Planning Data

Population Projections, Michigan Department of Management and Budget,
Office of Revenue and Tax Analysis, March, 1985.
Population Projections, Genesee-Lapeer-Shiawassee Region V Planning and
Development Commission, Flint, Michigan 1986.
Population Projections, Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, Region
1, "Small Area Forecast," Detroit, Hichigan.
Population Projections, The WBDC Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1988.
Civilian Labor Force and Employment Estimates for &amp;eauee and Shia:w.ss"
Counties, 1980 and 1987, Michigan Employme11t Security Colllltssion.
Bureau of Research and Statistics - F~eld Analysts Ul.li
Michigan.

News

Repo~t

Flint-Genesee
Mi¢hig,ae 1 May 1 1:9&amp;7.

�Existing Land Use and Housing CGnditions F1e1d Sll.lrvey (Ottolle
WBDC Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
1975 Fenton Master P-lan for Land Use, City of Fenton Pl•n
and V11ican Leman and Associates, Fenton, Michigan.

Fenton Wetlands Map, prepared by the National Wetl.-Js IMerd~~.
Department of the Interior. Fish a11d VHcfltfe- S.rvtce, Wash "·»~"!:.,
1978.
Soil Survey, Genesee County, Michigan, U.S. Department ef Agf'icult
Conservation Service in cooperation with the Mitbip~ Agr eut
Experiment Station, Genesee, Michigan--,. 1N7. dt.!CIM•
a ,- ..~
1972.
Flood Insurance Rate Map for City ef FentN- Nation
Program, Federal Emergency Management AfeKY ·
Photography of City of Fentcm risg) e.t:esn
Pl ann1 ng Conwlrl ss ion , Flint , Mi ch Pit•

Aer1a1

llopk
Demog lph

�The Blinton Plan (Draft June
Watertown, Massachusetts.

21,

1988),

Sasaki

&amp; Associates Inc.,

1988 City of Fenton Capital Improvement Program, City of Fenton, Fenton,
Michigan.
Urban Planning and Design Criteria (Third Edition), OeChiara and Koppelman,
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York 1982.
City of Fenton Water System Study. Spicer Engineering,
1981.
City of Fenton Bicycle Route Evaluation,
1984.
1987 City of Fenton
Michigan.

Recreation

Saginaw,

Michigan,

City of Fenton, Fenton, Michigan,

Master Plan,

City of Fenton, Fenton,

Traffic Counts by Intersection (Counts taken on 12-17-87 and 12-18-87,
counts taken for one half hour and expanded to reflect one hour
volumes):
Leroy at Main/First
Silver Lake at Roberts
South Leroy at Silver Lake
North Leroy at Silver Lake
South Leroy at Shiawassee
North Leroy at North
North Adelaide at North
East Caroline at Walnut
South Adelaide at Shiawassee
North Adelaide at Silver Lake

- 122 -

�Persona

Interviews:

Edward B. Koryzno Jr., City Manager, City of Fenton.
Michael Cain, Administrative Assistant, City of Fenton.
Leslie P. Bland, Director of Public Works, City of Fenton.
Gerald Cattaneo, Police Chief, City of Fenton.
Bruce Dorland, Fire Chief, City of Fenton.
Ann Black, Executive Director, Fenton Area Chamber of Commerce.
Kathryn Cain, Director, Fenton Community Center.
Esther Alderman, Financial Administrative Assistant, Fenton Area
Schools.
Bob Chenowith, Developer of Fenway Plaza and co-chairman of the Fenton
Growth Resources Committee.
Jerry Mansour, Mansour Developments, Flint, Michigan.
John Mansour, J.M. Developments, Fenton, Michigan.
Jim Pushman, Pushman Manufacturing, Fenton, Michigan.
Jim Dmoch, Ideal Pharmacy in Fenton Square, Fenton, Michigan.
Lynn McClure, Dancers Store in Fenton Square, Fenton, Michigan.
Philip G. Stair, Genesee County Metropolitan Planning C01111tissfon,
Economic Development Division, Flint, Michigan.

Timothy Leonard, Principal Planner, Genesee County Metropolitan
Planning Commission, Flint, Michigan.
- 123 -

�Tom Goergen, Planner, Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission,
Flint, Michigan.
Jul ·e A. Hinterman, Community Development
Development Program, Genesee County
Corn~ission, Flint, Michigan.

Specialist, Conmunity
Metropolitan Planning

Anthony Schifano, Executive Director, Flint-Genesee Corporation, Flint,
Michigan.

Public Meetings on Master Plan:
October 8, 1987
January 21, 1988
February 18, 1988
March 31, 1988
May 5, 1988
June 16, 1988
September 15, 1988
November 3, 1988 (Public Hearing)
December 15, 1988

- 124 -

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008206">
                <text>Fenton_Comprehensive-Plan_1989</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008207">
                <text>City of Fenton Planning Commission, City of Fenton, Genesee County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008208">
                <text>1989-02</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008209">
                <text>City of Fenton, Michigan Comprehensive Plan 1989</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008210">
                <text>The City of Fenton, Michigan Comprehensive Plan 1989 was prepared by the City of Fenton Planning Commission with assistance from The WBDC Group in February 1989.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008211">
                <text>The WBDC Group (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008212">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008213">
                <text>Fenton (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008214">
                <text>Genesee County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008215">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008217">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008218">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008219">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008220">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038319">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54704" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58975">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ede598b49b2ced6432ca61cddc31c866.pdf</src>
        <authentication>871fd7c9f420adc211fdd7fce64ced8a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008373">
                    <text>CITY OF GAYLORD

1990-1995
RECREATION PLAN
Adopted: June 14, 1990

GAYL0RD
the Alpine Village
CITY COUNCIL:

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION:

Ernest Grocock, Mayor
William Tholl, Mayor Pro-Tern
Patrick Mankowski
Luke Noss
Eugene Niedzwiecki
Tom Nelson
Scott Dunn

Sandra (Toni) Brown, Chairperson
Gerald Campbell
Norm Brecheisen
Kellie Galer
Leona (Sam) Titus
Maude Gilmore
Douglas Squires
Steve Swan
Terra Deming

�City of Gaylord
PHO:\E (5 Ii) 732-4060
F:\X (517) 732-8266
225 WEST \IA!:\ STREET
GAYLORD. \1ICHIGAN 49735

~
aAYL0ftD

1hl' Alpu:e V,lla~.,

June 13, 1990

Mr. Philip Wells
Department of Natural Resources
Stevens T. Mason Building
P.O. Box 30028
Lansing, Michigan 48909
Dear Mr. Wells:
I hereby certify that the following resolution was passed at
the City Council Meeting of Monday, June 11, 1990:
Moved by Nelson, supported by Dunn to adopt the revised
City of Gaylord 1990/1995 Recreation Plan as presented.
Ayes:

Grocock, Nelson, Dunn, Noss and Thall.

Nays:

None.

Motion carried.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

/llmo__) ~~
Rebecca Curtis
City Clerk

�STATE OF MICHIGAN

IZ

NATURAL RESOURCl:'.S COMMISSION

THOMAS J . ANDERSON
MARLENE J . FLUHARTY
GORDON E. GUYER
KERRY KAMMER
ELLWOOD A. MATTSON
0 . STEWART MYERS
RAYMOND POUPORE

JAMES J. BLANCHARD. Governor

BEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
STEVENS T. MASON BUILDING
P.O. BOX 30028
LANSING. Ml 48909
DAVID F. HALES. Director

July 12, 1990

Mr. Dave Siegel, City Manager
City of Gaylord
225 W. Main
Gaylord, Michigan 49735
Dear Mr. Siegel:
SUBJECT:

City of Gaylord Recreation Plan

The community recreation plan referenced above has been approved by this
Division. City of Gaylord is now eligible to participate in our grant programs
through December 31, 1995. We ask that you provide copies of the final plan to
the Community's elected and appointed officials and make copies available to
the public.
All projects for which grant assistance is sought must be listed and justified
in the plan.
The community may amend the plan as needed.
All amendments must be
accompanied by evidence of approval by the community's governing body. Amendments must be in the form of either (1) a complete revised document, with a
cover letter describing the changes; or (2) substitute or additional pages,
with clear indication as to where they are to be inserted in the plan (the
second option applies only if the plan on file here is suitably bound). Plan
revisions will not extend the eligibility period stated above unless all plan
content is updated and the community requests extended eligibility.
If you have any questions on this, please contact me.
Sincerely,

~

jA£~ -~ ~

~ i -~:[{., Mgr. , Recreation Planning
Recreation Services Branch
Recreation Division
517-335-3038

PW:mlf
cc: Mr. Eric Antisdale, MDNR
R1026
3/89

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I.

INTRODUCTION

4

CULTURAL AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF OTSEGO COUNTY

5

Transportation and Regional Location . . · ~ . .
Natural Resources . • .
. . . . . . . . . .
Water Resources . . . . . . . .
Environmental Conditions. . . .
. ..
Land Use .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Population . . . .
. . .
. . . . . . . . .
Economic Activity • • . . . . . . . .
Utilities . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
II.
III.
IV.

v.
VI.

6

7

15
19
23
26

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

28

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44

RECREATIONAL INVENTORY
ADMINISTRATION

5
5

DEFICIENCIES AND NEEDS
LONG RANGE GOALS

SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES

. .

.....

2

. . . . . . . . .

45

�LIST OF TABLES
Page

Table#

. . . . . .

1

AGRICULTURE 1964-1982 • • • .

2

POPULATION BY CIVIL DIVISION, OTSEGO CO., MICHIGAN
1970-1988 .
. • . . . • . . . . . .
. . .

19

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP, OTSEGO CO., MICHIGAN
1970-1980.
• •..........

20

3A

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP, CITY OF GAYLORD, MI

22

4

POPULATION PROJECTIONS, OTSEGO CO.

3

17

. . . . . .

22

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure#
1

GENERALIZED SOILS MAP.

2

LAND USE MAP

3

PLANNING PROCESS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE.

4

ASPEN PARK NATURE AREA

5

DOUMAS PARK.

6

FREEL PARK

7

HALE PARK

8

CITY OF GAYLORD AND J:T'S PARKS

7a

. . . . . . . . . . .

..

. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3

16a
41a
45a
46a
47a
47b
44a

�INTRODUCTION

The preparation of this 1990 Parks and Recreation Plan has
been a continuous process since 1985 when the City Council and
Planning Commission was studying the recreation needs of the
community. The purchase of Aspen Park, a quiet nature area,
with City Funds is a testimony to the dedication of improving
recreation needs for City, County and visitors alike.
'

Specifically this plan was formulated by the City Staff
under the guidelines set forth by the City Planning Commission.
One of the criteria for this plan was to integrate with Otsego
County's Recreation Planning. The staff received help from
numerous sources including, but not limited to the following:
Citizens of Gaylord
City Council
Gaylord Community Schools
Michigan Employment Security Commission
Northeast Michigan Council of Governments
Otsego County Parks and Recreation Department
Otsego County Soil Conservation District
The Planning Commission held a series of meetings with the
above mentioned agencies and the public was invited for input.
In some instances particular individuals were specifically
invited to work with both the Planning Commission and City
Staff. The City of Gaylord is the only incorporated City in
Otsego County therefore, great effort was taken to include the
Gaylord Community Schools and Otsego County. In some instances
City facilities are utilized by the school and the County.
Therefore, the Planning Commission took great pains to receive
input from these two groups.
The 1990 Recreation Plan formally establishes a set of
goals to further enhance the recreational opportunities for all
citizens living or visiting the Gaylord area. The City Council
and Planning Commission realize this Recreation Plan is the
first step to allow the realization of the full potential of our
park systems.
For the City of Gaylord to accomplish the stated goals and
objectives of this plan, cooperation with many local, State and
Federal agencies is necessary. With the initiative set forth by
the City Council and Planning Commission reaching the stated
goals of this plan will become a reality because of the
continued efforts to cooperate with other governmental agencies
for the benefits of all citizens.

4

�I.

CULTURAL AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY OF GAYLORD
AND OTSEGO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AND REGIONAL LOCATION

The City of Gaylord has the advantage of being centrally
located in northern Michigan.
It is serviced by Interstate 75,
which as of this writing, {March 1, 1990) is the only four lane
interstate freeway system in northern Michigan. The freeway
provides convenient access for travel to and from populated
areas of southcentral and southeastern Michigan. The freeway
has much impact on the economic livelihood of the City and
County, providing convenient access for tourists downstate. The
major east-west route serving Gaylord and Otsego County is
M-32. This route connects Gaylord with Alpena, the largest city
of northeast Michigan, a distance of 72 miles. To the west,
M-32 indirectly provides access to Traverse City, Charlevoix and
Petoskey.
The Gaylord Industrial Park Airport, located one mile
southwest of downtown Gaylord, provides both private and charter
service.
Charter service is provided by one company. The air
field is capable of accommodating a 727. It is a Class A
airport, has a full-time manager and is open seven days a week.
The City of Gaylord and Otsego County are serviced by the
Detroit and Mackinaw Railway. There is one main line running
north-south through the city and county in close proximity to
I-75. No passenger service is available on this line.

NATURAL RESOURCES
The most important natural resources of the area in terms
of providing a foundation for recreational activities are the
abundance of trees, clean air, clean water and wild game. Each
of these also provides an important economic base for the area.
Tourists, primarily from southern Michigan are attracted to
Gaylord because of the recreational amenities available. Many
jobs in Gaylord and Otsego County are highly dependent on the
tourist dollar. Also, the abundance of trees supports a healthy
lumber and wood products industry. Georgia-Pacific, located in
Gaylord, employs approximately 275 people and produces wood
products.

5

�Water Resources

The City of Gaylord has very minimal surface water
resources. There are no lakes or streams in the City of
Gaylord. Scott's pond, located partially in the City's Aspen
Park, is the only surface water. This pond consisting of a few
acres is home to two beaver families and a source of drinking
water for native animals in the area.
The City is blessed however, with abundant drinking water.
The City recently built a $7.2 million dollar wastewater
treatment facility to help protect this valuable natural
resource. The problem of pollution of our natural resources was
the driving force that led to the new facility being built in
1986. The urbanization trend and increase in population
necessitates the proper removal and disposal of domestic and
industrial wastes to avoid any possibility of contamination to
the City's water supply and resulting hazards to the Community's
health.

6

�Environmental Conditions

a.

Soils &amp; Subsurface Conditions

Soils in the Plan of Study Area (City of Gaylord) are a result
of a large intermorainal outwash plain exhibiting deep granular
soils with high permeability and little evidence of surfa~e
drainage features. The predominant soil series within the study
Area are of the Rubicon-Grayling Association, the Kalkaska-East
Lake-Mancelona Association, or the Leelanau-Emmet-Kalkaska
Association. The U. s. Department of Agriculture system of
classification describes these associations as follows:

RUBICON-GRAYLING ASSOCIATION
These are nearly level to gently sloping, well drained, sandy
soils. Areas of these soils are popularly designated as
Jackpine plains. They have low natural fertility, low moisture
holding capacity, and rapid permeability.

KALKASKA-EAST LAKE-MANCELONA ASSOCIATION

These are nearly level to gently sloping, well drained sandy and
gravelly soils of the hardwood plains. These soils are slightly
more fertile and hold slightly greater amounts of moisture than
those in the Rubicon-Grayling Association.

LEELANAU-EMMET-KALKASKA ASSOCIATION
These are sloping to steep, well drained sandy and loamy soils
on complex rolling areas and hills. They range from medium to
moderately low or low in natural fertility and moisture holding
capacity. Permeability ranges from moderate to rapid.
Underlying the surface soils of the area is a very thick stratem
of sand with a few isolated clay lenses which are typically less
than five feet thick. The bedrock is located at a depth of more
than 600 feet.
Figure 6 shows the generalized soils for the
Study Area.

7

�.

-

_,

~

r
·i

I

f.

I

,r
,.

l

r

t
l

•

l
"Ultt...

I
I

l4

I
1...-.

I

~

-~-

l

I
I
I
I
I

~

I!

· -umn

I

·I , :I ~
'I

•

IiI
I
I
I

__ ..JI

Cl
I
H

I
¢. ..$iiii.!! . -

--·--

L

. . . . . . 0A-J.A- IC

·rI ·-= ,..... ___

0

KALKASKA

~ RUBICON

EAST LAKE

MANCELONA

GENE~ALIZED

SOILS

GRAYLING

an LEELANAU • . EMMEI
mJ CARBONDALE •

TAWAS

KALKASKA

FIGURE 1

ROSCOMMON
SOURCE: U.S. :tPARTM::NT

7a

OF lG"ICV...r:q~

o.::s

�b.

Hydrology &amp; Topography

The Plan of Stuoy Area lies primarily within the drainage basin
of the Sturgeon River. The headwaters of the Sturgeon River is
located to the northeast of the City of Gaylord and flows in a
northerly direction where it flows into Burt and Mullett lakes.
Drainage out of these lakes is to the north down the Cheboygan
River to Lake Huron. A small portion in the southern part of
the Study Area drains into Otsego Lake and then to Lake Huron
through the AuSable watershed.
The topography of the Plan of Study Area displays natural slopes
generally less than 1.5 percent. This relatively flat terrain
is evident throughout most of the Plan of Study Area except in
the northeasterly portion where gullies can be found. These
gullies are tributaries to the Sturgeon River.

c.

Climate

Otsego County's climate is classified as
temperate-humid-continental.
Day to day weather is
characterized by constantly changing weather patterns. The
county seldom experiences prolonged periods of excessively hot
weather or of extremely cold weather. The prevailing winds are
predominantly westerly. The average length of the freeze-free
period, the number of days between the average date of the last
spring freeze (32o F.) and the average date of the first fall
freeze (32o F.) is 116 days.
The average annual snowfall is 136.2 inches.
Area lies within the "Lake Snowbelt".

The Plan of Study

The maximum one hour rainfall expected to occur in the county at
fifty year intervals is about 2 to 2.2 inches, the maximum
estimated fifty year, twenty-four hour rainfall is about 4 to
4.5 inches.

8

�Inventory of Lakes in Otsego County

,
There are a total of 336 lakes/ponds in the County
according to a Michigan Lake Inventory Bulletin done by the
Department of Resource Development at Michigan State
University. Twenty-six of these lakes are 50 or more acres in
size. The largest is Otsego Lake covering approximately 1,972
acres or 3.08 square miles.
Names of Lake. Location &amp; Area

Description of Lake

..

Bear (Big) Lake
Panfishing;
100% mineral
shoreline; maximum
depth 30 feet;
public access

Sec. 1, 2, of T29, 30N, RlW,
435 acres

Bear (Little) Lake
Private development
around most of lake
100% mineral
shoreline; maximum
depth 35 feet

Sec. 2, T29, 30N, RlW,
127 acres

Douglas Lake
Panfishing;
100% mineral
shoreline

Sec. 9, T29N, RlW,
94 acres
Crapo Lake

Maximum depth

Sec. 30, T29N, RlW,
92 acres

3 feet; panfishing;
60% mineral
shoreline,
40% organic

Bass Lake
Panfishing, trout
fishing; maximum
depth 20 feet;
90% mineral
shoreline;
10% organic

Sec. 1, 2, 11, T29N, R2W
70 acres

9

�Turtle Lake
Undeveloped natural
lake; 20% mineral
shoreline,
80% organic

Sec. 4, 33, T2~, JON, R2W
164 acres

Emerald Lake
Panfish, pike;
maximum depth
35 feet; 75% mineral
shoreline;
25% organic

Sec. 1, 6, T29N, R2,3W
53 acres

Opal Lake
Public access;
panfish, pike;
100% mineral
shoreline; maximum
depth 42 feet

Sec. 1, 12, T29N, R3W
122 acres

Otsego Lake
Public access sites
including
beachfront; much
of shoreline is
privately owned;
panfish, pike,
muskies; 90% mineral
shoreline;
10% organic

T29,30N, R3W
1972 acres, 3.08 sq. miles

Chub Lake
Panfish, pike, trout;
maximum depth 74
feet; 75% mineral
shoreline,
25% organic

Sec. 14, 23, T29N, R3W
75 acres

Heart Lake
Residential developed
lake; 100% mineral
shoreline. Public
access.

Sec. 20, T29N, R3W
65 acres

10

�Barefoot Lake
Sec. 29, 32, T29N
R3W, 225 acres •

Public access;
prankish; pike;
100% mineral
shoreline

Lynn Lake
Sec. 23, 24, 25, 26 T29N
RAW, 52 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake; panicking;
10% mineral
shoreline,
90% organic

Big Lake
Sec. 7, 8, T30N, RAW
126 acres

Public access;
prankish, pike;
90% mineral,
10% organic; maximum
depth 81 feet

Dixon Lake
Sec. 14, T30N, R3W
78 acres

Public access;
panfish, pike;
maximum depth 30
feet; 100% mineral
shoreline

Perch Lake
Sec. 30, T30N, R3W
65 acres

Much of shoreline
privately developed;
panfish; 100% organic
shoreline; maximum
depth 26 feet

Thomas Lake
Sec. 23, T30N, R4W
53 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake; panfish, pike;
100% mineral
shoreline

Lake Manuka
Sec. 25, 35, 36, T30N
R4W, 163 acres

Public access;
panfishing; maximum
depth 27 feet
100% mineral
shoreline

11

�Buhl Lake
Sec. 32, T30N, R4W
95 acres
"

Undeveloped natural
lake with 100%
mineral shoreline

South Five Lakes
Sec. 2 9 , 3 O , 31 , 3 2
T31N, R3W, 50 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake

Lake Five
Sec. 29, 30, T31N, R3W
64 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake

Porcupine Lake
Sec. 13, 23, 24, T31N
R4W, 61 acres

Panfishing; 100%
mineral shoreline;
maximum depth
23 feet

Lake Twenty-seven
Sec. 27, T31N, R4W
120 acres

Some private
development
around lake; 100%
mineral shoreline

Guthrie Lake
Sec. 36, T29N, R3W
115 acres

Private development 100% mineral
shoreline

Lake Horicon
Sec. 1, 2, 11, 12, T29N
R4W, 63 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake with 100%
mineral shoreline

Lake Tecon
Sec. 2, 11, 14, T29N, R4W
270 acres

Some private
development on west
side of lake;
panfishing; 100%
mineral shoreline;
maximum depth 3 feet

12

�Minerals
Mineral Resources in the county have also contributed to
the economy. Otsego county, in 1989, was one of the leading
county in the state in terms of oil production.
It is estimated
that 400 people are employed in the drilling, exploration and
production of gas and oil. Nearly six million barrels of oil
were produced in the county in 1983. Also, in that year, over
12 million cubic feet of natural gas was produced, making Otsego
County the 4th leading gas producing county in the state.
Hydrology
Otsego County has a total of 6,682 acres ot surface water
in the form of 116 lakes. The county also has 140 miles of
trout streams. Fishing is very popular for trout on most
streams, with several lakes also having trout populations. The
warmer lakes normally have bluegill, bass, perch and pike.
Tiger musky have also been stocked in several lakes and are
reaching trophy size. A complete inventory of county lakes and
streams is on a preceding page.
Groundwater supplies in the county are very productive in
the predominant gravels and unconsolidated sands of the glacial
drift. The groundwater aquifers are recharged by precipitation
which is readily absorbed by the permable soils. Individual
wells near the lakes and streams are usually quite shallow due
to the existing high water table. Wells located on high
moraines may be in excess of 250 feet. Wells in the county of 6
inch in diameter or more will yield from 10-500 gallons per
minute.
The county consists basically of two watersheds, one being
the Cheboygan watershed draining northerly and consisting of the
Sturgeon, Pigeon and Black Rivers. The southern part of the
county drains south into the AuSable watershed.
Soil Classification
The soils breakdown presented in Figure 5 was obtained from
information made available by the Soil Conservation Service.
The following notes applying to the individual soil types listed
on the map, are taken from the pamphlet "Interpretations of the
General Soils Map of Otsego County, Michigan".
Soil Association 1:

Rubicon-Grayling-Kalkaska

These are nearly level to undulating, well drained sandy
soils, popularly designated as jack pine plains. They have low
natural fertility, low moisture holding capacity and rapid
permeability (dominant slope 0-6%).

13

�Soil Association 2:

Kalkaska-East Lake-Mancelona

These are . nearly level to undulating, well drained sandy
and gravelly soils of the hardwood plains. These soils are
slightly more fertile and hold slightly greater amounts of
moisture than those listed in Association 1 (dominant slope
0-6%).
Soil Association 3:

Coventry-Karlin

These are nearly level to undulating, well drained sandy
and loamy soils occupying high plateau-like areas in the
uplands. They have medium to moderately low fertility and
moisture holding capacity with permeability ranging from
moderate to rapid (dominant slope 0-6%).
Soil Association 4:

Rubicon-Graycalm-Montcalm

These are undulating to rolling well drained sandy soils on
uplands, including dry valleys, benches, plateau-like areas and
many small lakes. These soils have moderately low to low
natural fertility and moisture holding capacity and rapid
permeability (dominant slopes 2-12% and 6-25%).
Soil Association 5:

Kalkaska-Blue Lake-Rubicon

These are dominantly sloping to steep, well drained sandy
soils. Most areas consist of a network of ridges enclosing dry
valleys with steep escarpment-like sides. The soils are low in
natural fertility and moisture holding capacity with rapid
permeability (dominant slopes 2-12% and 6-25%).
Soil Association 6:

Emmet-Leelanau

These are gently sloping to sloping, well drained sandy and
loamy soils on the undulating to rolling uplands. Major soils
in this association have medium to moderately low natural
fertility and moisture holding capacity with moderate to
moderately rapid permeability (dominant slope 2-12%).
Soil Association 7:

Leelanau-Emmet-Kalkaska-Mancelona

These are sloping to steep, well drained sandy and loamy
soils on complex rolling acres and hills. They range from
medium to moderately low or low in natural fertility and
moisture holding capacity with moderate to rapid fertility
(dominant slopes 2-12% and 6-25%).
Soil Association 8:

Nester-Kawkawlin-Iosco

These are nearly level to gently sloping, well drained to
somewhat poorly drained loamy soils of the till plain, including
random small wet spots and swales. Major soils in this
association have moderately high natural fertility and moisture
14

�holding capacity with moderately slow permeability (dominant
slope 0-6%).
Soil Association 9:

Ubly-Nester-Menominee

These are gently sloping to rolling, well drained sandy and
loamy soils on uplands, including random small muck-filled
depressions. Major soils in this association have medium to
moderately high natural fertility and moisture holding
capacity. Permeability ranges from moderately rapid to
moderately slow (dominant slope 2-18%).
Soil Association 10:

Carbondale-Tawas-Roscommon.

This association consists of poorly drained sandy soils and
mucks occurring mainly in stream channels and swamps. they have
low natural fertility with moderately rapid to rapid
permeability. Moisture holding capacity is high in the organic
soils and low in the sandy mineral soils (dominant slope 0-2%).
LAND USE
Otsego County has 334,272 acres or 527 square miles of land
area. Of this, 91,101 acres (142.3 sq. miles) or 27.25 percent
of the land in the county is owned by the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources. The land use analysis presented here
explores the county's physical character. This information is
important since land and water resources play such a vital role
in establishing the character of the county and in providing
opportunities for recreational activities. Total land uses were
tabulated by Michigan State University in their publication
"County and Regional Facts" (1979).
These figures show that the
land use for Otsego County is:

Total Area:
Inland Water:
Land Surface

344,172 acres
6,784 acres
337,388 acres

Forested:
Agriculture:
Transportation:
Recreation:
Urban:
Other:

251,000
45,904
9,120
489
1,261
29,614

acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres

( 74.4%)
( 13.6%)
(
2.7%)
(
0.1%)
(
0.4%)
(
8.8%)

TOTAL:

337,388 acres

(100.0%)

15

�A general synopsis of land use in Otsego County includes
the following (See Land Use Map on following page):
Forest land makes up the bulk of the county's land use
(approximately 75%). Over one-third of the forest land in the
county is state owned with the remainder in private hands.
Agricultural land is composed primarily of small to medium
sized farms (under 500 acres) producing hay, potatoes or corn.
The amount of land devoted to agriculture has decreased by
nearly one-third since 1964.
Residential land is concentrated in the City of Gaylord,
portions of the surrounding townships, along the major lake
shores, and in the smaller villages of the county. Nearly 85%
of all residential structures in the county are single family
units. Mobile homes account for approximately one out of every
nine residential structures in the county.
There are over 20,000 subdivided parcels in the county.
Currently, 2,500 of these parcels are developed. Another 2,900
were platted before the existing building codes took effect and
are unsuitable for development. This leaves over 14,000 legally
subdivided parcels available for development throughout the
county.
There are also nearly 1,000 ten acre parcels throughout the
county, many of which are currently undeveloped and could be
available for future residential use.
Commercial facilities within the county fall into three
categories based on the markets they serve.
1.

Travel services along I-75 and Old 27 for those
passing through or visiting the area.

2.

County-wide specialized services provided in the City
of Gaylord for all residents of the area as well as
travelers and vacationers.

3.

Convenience facilities located in or near villages
throughout the county. These serve the more rural
year-round and seasonal residents plus the visitors or
travelers and provide general goods and services.

Industrial activity in the county is related to either
manufacturing (primarily durable goods) or resource extraction.
Manufacturing operations are located at the southern edge of
Gaylord and in or near Vanderbilt with major products including
construction materials, auto components and copper tubing.
Resource extraction includes several gravel pits located
throughout the county as well as oil and gas drilling and
processing sites. The county's location along the Niagaran Reef
16

�•

1
•
I

H

I

I :.-.,,

5

--·--

L

-D•- IC

LAND USE MAP
ll
NlUSTRIAl.
EXTilACTI'IIE
-AGR!CULn.RAL

~ PUB.JC

FOMST
. "'R'!IVATI FOREST
:~ Pl.A TTI:O SUSIJVISIONS
~::lECREATICJ,IAl.
PUBLIC FAQUT'r

g

16a

FIGURE 2

�has meant increased oil and gas drilling in recent years which
has led to the construction of several pipelines and gas
sweetening plants in the county. Recent emphasis has shifted to
Antrim exploration and processing period.
Recreation activity is an important element in both Otsego
County's general character and its economy. Public recreation
lands include extensive state forest holdings, as well as the
State Park and County park located along Otsego Lake. These are
general recreation facilities providing sites for a wide range
of individual or group outdoor activities. The City and county
also have a wide range of privately owned recreation sites for
more specific activities (skiing, golf, etc.) and offers
extensive opportunities for recreation on privately owned
undeveloped property (hunting, snowmobiling, hiking, etc.).
The lakes and rivers of the area are another important part
of the county's character and provide many opportunities for
recreation activity.
Lake and riverfront property has become
valuable for both its residential as well as recreational
potential.
The City and county's connection with I-75 has helped to
make it an excellent location for commercial, recreation and
industrial activities.
East-west connections to other portions
of the state are somewhat inadequate and could be improved. The
county has adequate freight service, but is lacking passenger
service by rail. Daily passanger air service has been initiated
in the spring of 1990.
Agriculture and Forestry
Agriculture and forestry combined to make up 88% of Otsego
County's land use. Forestry plays an important role in total
land use and in the county's economic picture. Approximately
75% of the land surface of the county is forested with another
13% in agriculture. Less than 1% of the county's land is used
for urban activities.
TABLE

I

AGRICULTURE 1964-1982

OTSEGO COUNTY
Year

Number of Farms

1964
1968
1974
1978
1982

266
172
132
151
142

% Change

Acres in Farms

% Change

61,867
46,052
35,308
41,500
41,510

- 26%
- 23%
18%

- 35.0%
- 23.0%
14.4%
6.0%
17

�Table I shows the number of farms and farm acreage for the
county from 1964 - 1982. Agricultural land in the county is
made up primar~ly of small to medium size farms.
In 1982, 80%
of all county farms were between SO and 500 acres in size. Only
four farms in the county were over 1,000 acres. Major products
include potatoes, oats, corn, livestock and dairy products.
With 63% of the county's forested area in private
ownership, there has been an increasing tendency to split large
holdings into 10 acre parcels for seasonal and year-round
residences or other uses. These smaller parcels, owned by a
diversity of individuals, cannot be effectively managed for
productive timber cutting and their continued increase reduces
the return from this important resource.
~
The physical form of a community is the result of the actions of
many individuals and agencies. The buildings and structures
created by private enterprise requires supporting public
facilities such as streets, utilities, parks and schools. The
manner in which these public and private improvements are
related to each other largely determines the character of our
community.
Proper planning of these relationships results in an
orderly, attractive community.
Residential uses occupy the greatest amount of developed land
area within Gaylord. Though the residential pattern is located
fairly uniformly around the central business district, new
residential developments have been primarily taking place to the
northeast and north. Scattered residential uses are found along
M-32 to the east and Old Highway 27 to the North. The
long-established business district is located at the crossing of
M-32 and Business Loop 27, generally the geographic center of
the City. This was the largest concentration of commercial land
uses, but new development within the past few years along M-32
to the west and along Business Loop 27 to the South are the new
developing commercial areas.
Industrial land uses form a definite pattern in Gaylord. This
being concentrated along Dickerson Road which leads to the
Gaylord Air Industrial Park. The Industrial park comprises the
remaining industrial area of the City. Public and semi-public
uses occupy a considerable amount of the area within and around
the City of Gaylord. The Hidden Valley Ski Club and golf course
forms a large mass on the east side of the City; the community
School, and City property forms a large mass to the south; The
former state hospital which is now county owned property occupy
large tracts to the north. West of Interstate 75 is the Otsego
County Airport which occupies a large tract which impedes
development in that area.
PU.blic and semi-public uses in
Gaylord occupy a considerable share of the developed land within
the City.

18

�POPULATION
Table 2 s~ows population by civil division within the
county. A quick reference to the county map, indicates that
most of the population as well as the most significant growth is
in the municipalities around the I-75 corridor from Gaylord
south to the Crawford County line. The amenities and
recreational opportunities offered at Otsego Lake may be
responsible for more rapid development in this particular area
of the county.
Developments that offer some degree of privacy
of "space" between neighbors, such as Michaywe', are currently
attractive to many residents. Michaywe' had an excess of 40 new
homes constructed in 1989.

TABLE 2
POPULATION BY CIVIL DIVISION
OTSEGO COUNTY. MICHIGAN 1970-1988
Civil Division
Otsego County
Bagley Township
Charlton Township
Chester Township
Corwith Township
Dover Township
Elmira Township
Gaylord, City of
Hayes Township
Livingston Township
Otsego Lake Township
Vanderbilt, Village of

1988

1980

1970

16,900
4,630
1,010
710
1,390
410
1,030
3,440
960
1,810
1,360
560

14,993
4,106
823

10,422
2,294
573
332
1,126
317
486
3,012

661
1,313
432
899
3,011
888
1,703

416

1,157

1,393
473

525

522

19

(1970-1988)
% Change

62.2
101. 8
76.3
76.3
23.4
29.3
111.9
14.2
130.8
29.9
187.5
7.3

�TABLE 3
POPULATION BY AGE GROUP
OTSEGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN 1970-1980
Age Group
Total
00-04
05-14
15-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+

1980

% of Total

1970

% of Total

14,993
1,252
2,710
2,550
2,287
1,757
1,446
1,357
1,634

8.4
18.1
17.0
15.3
11.7
9.6
9.1
10.9

10,422
1,033
2,460
1,538
l,3oj
1,110
1,026
965
987

9.9
23.6
14.7
12.5
10.6
9.8
9.2
9.5

A major consequence to the area is the influx of seasonal
and temporary residents. During the summer months population
estimates have shown more than a 200% increase over the
permanent population•. This figure only includes
seasonal/temporary housing residents, campers and renters at
commercial lodges. It does not include private camps and
resorts, visitors who stay with family or friends or mobile
homes. Although many of these seasonal/temporary residents
utilize the area beaches and state forestlands, they also are
showing an increasing demand for day-use of the City and County
recreational facilities. The winter season is also becoming
increasingly popular with temporary residents utilizing ski
slopes, ski trails and snowmobile trails in the county.
The Gaylord area is promoted as the Golf Mecca, the heart
of America's summer golf capital. Several new championship golf
courses have recently been built with more slated for
construction in 1990. In 1989, 200,000 rounds of golf were
played compared to 145,903 in 1987. The total golf impact on
the area economy is $112,500,000**· The recent impact of
golfing in the area has been phenominal.
Table 3 provides a breakdown of population by age groups
within Otsego County. The percentage of total population is
given to show the relative importance to the total population.

*

Figure derived from Clean Water Program Interim Outputs,
NEMCOG 1977

**

Gaylord Area Convention and Tourism Bureau

20

�The 5-14 age group was the largest in 1970 and 1980, in both
relative and in absolute terms. The relative increase of the
15-24 age group in 1980 is partly from the aging of the 5-14 age
group of 1970. Relative increases were noted in the 25-34 and
35-44 age group as well. Much of the increase of these age
groups was from migration into the county.
Additionally, important increases occurred in the 65 and
over category. The importance of a large 5-14, 15-24 and 65 and
over age group concerning recreation must be recognized. The
5-14 and 15-24 age groups are most likely to require and utilize
recreational provisions. Also, the 65 and over age group is
composed of retirees frequently with considerable leisure time
which creates a need for recreational opportunities for senior
citizens.
A major component of population change, in addition to
births and deaths, is migration in and out of a community. Net
migration is determined by subtracting deaths from births and
comparing this sum to population change recorded by the Census.
With a population increase from 1970-1980 of 4,571 (14,993 10,422) we want to know how much was natural increase and how
much was from migration. During this period there was 1,140
more births than deaths, thus the natural increase•. Therefore,
the remainder of the increase, 3,431 people migrated to the
county from 1970-1980. This means that 75% of the population
increase from 1970-1980 was from migration into the county.
Population projections for the county are based on current
trends. Department of Management and Budget (DMB) estimates for
1983 for the county placed the population at 15,283 and projects
the 1990 population to be 18,569. The DMB projects the 1995
Otsego County population to be 21,586 and the 2000 population to
be at 24,792.

*

Source:

Office of Revenue and Tax Analysis, Michigan
Department of Management and Budget
21

�TABLE 3A
POPULATION BY AGE GROUP
CITY OF GAYLORD*
AGE GROUP

o -

POPULATION COUNT

5 Years of Age

198
189
276
327
223
197
167
154
162
153
147
167
121
131
127
272

5 - 9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75+

Total City Population

3,011

Female Population

1,686

Male Population

1,325

..

TABLE 4
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
OTSEGO COUNTY

Year

Population

1970
1980
1990
2000

*

Source:

10,422
14,993
18,569
24,792

Migration

3,431
2,305
4,509

Total
Increase
4,571
3,576
6,223

% of Total Increases
from Migration
75%
64.5%
72.5%

GENERAL POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS, 1980
United States Census Bureau, Page 276
22

�ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

The unemployment rate for 1989 for Otsego County was 7.2
percent, an increase of .4 percent from 1988. The Gaylord Labor
Market Area has had the lowest unemployment rates in northeast
Michigan for the past several years. The average unemployment
rate for the eight counties of northeast Michigan was 10.9
percent in 1988 and 10.6 percent in 1989.
Non-manufacturing jobs accounted for 72.4 percent of total
employment in Otsego County in 1989. The service industries
combined with retail trade are responsible for 82.2 percent of
the non-manufacturing jobs. With the addition of retail
construction this trend appears to be increasing.

City and County Employers

The following is a list of the major employers (over 50
employees) in Otsego County:

Carter's

Gaylord

65 employees

Elias Brothers

Gaylord

65 employees

Gaylord comm. Schools

Gaylord

250 employees

Gaylord Opportunity

Gaylord

85 employees

Georgia Pacific

Gaylord

275 employees

Glen's Market

Gaylord

160 employees

GTE North

Gaylord

75 employees

Old Kent Bank

Gaylord &amp; Branches

75 employees

Higgins Industry

Vanderbilt

75 employees

Holiday Inn

Gaylord

65 employees

K-Byte Co.

Gaylord

250 employees

Mark One Automation

Gaylord

75 employees

Mayfair Plastics

Gaylord

50 employees

McDonald's

Gaylord

60 employees

23

�Otsego Mem. Hospital

Gaylord

250 employees

Otsego Ski Club

Gaylord

100 employees

Provincial House

Gaylord

100 employees

Standard Products Co.

Gaylord

340 employees

Otsego Co. Courthouse

Gaylord

80 employees

Sugar Bowl

Gaylord

50 employees

Van Products

Vanderbilt

75 employees

The list below gives the smaller employers in the City &amp; county:

Alpine Molding, Inc.

Plastic Products

Bozzer Brothers

Construction Machinery

Central Printing Corp.

Publishing, advertising

16 employees

E-Z Lift, Inc.

Door Manufacturing

14 employees

Jobbers Warehouse

Wholesale Auto Parts

16 employees

Michigan Hardwoods

Pallets, Skids, Wood

3 employees

Norandex Sales Co.

Metal Doors, Siding

5 employees

North Central Steel
&amp; Fabricators

Steel Warehousing

3 employees

Otsego Log Cabin Co.

Bldg. &amp; Components

16 employees

Peet Packing Co.

Meat Packing Plant

12 employees

Roberts Boring &amp; Mfg.

Fabricating, Mach. Shop

50 employees

24

18 employees
4 employees

�The preceding list of Basic Employers in Otsego County show
the diversity of the numbers of employer's and the different
types of produots, manufacturing and services offered in the
Gaylord and Otsego County.
Because there are no profiles and
civilian labor estimates available are done by using the base
employment for the County of 7850 and estimating the different
types of jobs.
Seasonal employment for the summer months are estima~ed to
increase an additional 15 to 20 percent. The civilian labor
force in the City is estimated as follows:
2,100 people
Labor Force
1,900 people
Employment
Estimated Unemployment
300 people
(With a rate of 14.3%) *

* Source is Michigan Employment Security Commission

25

�UTILITIES

The county's utility system includes the private suppliers
of electric, natural gas, telephone and cable television
services along with the publicly owned and operated
Crawford-Otsego landfill and Gaylord water and sewer systems.
These suppliers (with the exception of the Gaylord systems) are
faced with the task of providing services to a relatively low
density, dispersed population.
The most widely distributed service is electricity,
provided by Consumers Power and Top-a-Michigan Rural Electric.
Electrical service has expanded rapidly over the past 10 years
and there is a general feeling that requirements could double by
the year 2000. At the present time, there are no problems
envisioned in regard to expanding service to new users and
meeting future demands.
Natural gas is provided to portions of the county by the
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company. Gas is supplied by a
pipeline which generally follows Interstate 75, providing
service to the Waters, Gaylord and Vanderbilt area. Expanded
service would be possible to developed locations near the
existing service area, but the cost of extending lines makes
service beyond this area unlikely. Bottled gas, provided by
private suppliers, is widely used for heating and cooking in
portions of the county located away from the natural gas line.
Gaylord's water and sewer system currently serves the City
of Gaylord as well as developed areas immediately adjacent to
the city. The water system has been expanding at approximately
15% per year with current average daily usage at 550,000
gallons. The existing collection system could adequately meet
increased needs, the water distribution system has been expanded
and improved to meet the increase in demand.
It is expected
that most new service required in Gaylord will be for commercial
uses, with little room for residential expansion in the city.
The city's wastewater treatment facility currently handles
480,000 gallons of sewage per day, with a capacity of 850,000
gallons. This system was constructed in 1988 and should have a
useful life of 20 years.
In January 1986, the City of Gaylord
was awarded an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Grant for
3.5 million dollars for construction of a new wastewater
treatment facility. A Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan
of 3.4 million dollars was secured by the City of Gaylord for
the balance of the total cost of the project. An existing odor
problem was eliminated completely with the new treatment
facility.
The remainder of the county is served by individual wells
and septic tanks. In recent years, approximately four to five
hundred permits for wells and septic systems have been issued
each year.
In most portions of the county there are few
26

�problems associated with those systems. In the Johannesburg
area heavy clay soils often require extensive digging before an
adequate disposal area can be established and this could limit
residential expansion. The areas around many of the county's
major lakes and along Old 27 south of Gaylord have been
extensively developed, often creating problems in maintaining
proper levels of water quality.
Careful consideration must be given to protecting the
county's water resources from the effects of residential,
commercial and industrial development. Adequate drain fields
and proper maintenance of septic systems are important elements
in safeguarding water quality and should be closely monitored.
New developments should include provisions for nandling
household waste efficiently and adequately. Continued growth
should not be stifled by environmental restrictions but must be
located and designed so as to best fit in with the character of
the county while having a minimal impact on the area's resources.

27

---

-

-

-

-- -

-

-

�II.

RECREATIONAL INVENTORY

•

Recreation activities are a key factor in establishing the
character of the City and County. As stated earlier, state
forest land accounts for over 90,000 acres within the county, or
27% of the total land surface. These lands are located
primarily in the northeast and southeast sections of the county,
along the southern border and west of Otsego Lake. There are
seven state forest campgrounds, providing over 150 campsites,
located within the county. Hiking, cross-country skiing,
boating, canoeing and fishing are other primary public uses of
the county's state forest lands.
The county's water resources also play an important role
in recreation activity. Public facilities on the lakes include
the Otsego Lake State and County Parks. The state park is
located along the southeast lake shore and includes over 200
campsites on 62 acres with easy access to Otsego Lake for
boating and fishing. The county park, on the lake's northwest
shore, provides facilities for picnicking, boating and extensive
day use, and camping.
Many other smaller lakes are located throughout the county,
especially through the southern sections. These are used both
during the summer months (for boating, skiing, or fishing) and,
less intensely, during the winter months (for skating,
cross-country skiing or ice fishing).
In addition to the lakes, Otsego County has an extensive
system of rivers and wetlands. The Sturgeon, Pigeon and Black
Rivers all originate in the central portion of the county, while
the north and middle branches of the AuSable flow through the
southern sections of the county. These rivers offer many
opportunities for fishing and canoeing. As with the County's
lakes, property along these rivers is valuable for residential
purposes. Currently there are no special guidelines for
protecting the county's water resources from misuse or over
development. This should be an important element in efforts to
maintain the character of the area.
Other facilities located throughout the county provide a
wide range of recreation opportunities. There are some public
recreation facilities that are currently lacking within the
county, however. There is no public indoor swimming facility,
for instance, and no community auditorium. It might be possible
to combine these facilities at one central location with
additional space for public recreation such as tennis,
racquetball or meeting rooms. A facility of this nature could
serve a wide range of purposes for all county residents.

28

�In addition to a centralized activity site, recreational
opportunities could be increased by developing several smaller,
less intensive ~ites throughout the county. These could offer
opportunities for hiking, cross-country skiing and nature study
and could be developed to complement the current distribution of
parks and play fields.
In addition to public facilities available for recreational
use, the county has a wide range of privately operated
facilities including ten golf courses, two downhill ski areas,
swimming pools, riding stables and campgrounds. These
facilities are generally located near Gaylord and either M-32
and Old 27 and serve local residents along with seasonal
residents and visitors.
~
Beyond private and public facilities for recreation,
considerable activity takes place on private, individually owned
property. Snowmobiling, hunting and cross-country skiing are
seasonal activities that are popular throughout northern
Michigan, both for people living in the area and for those
traveling from southern Michigan or the Midwest and Canada.

29

�RECREATION PARKS AND FACILITIES

BAGLEY TOWNSHIP
Name

Facilities Available

ownership

Otsego Lake
County Park

27 acre park with 500' sand beach;
40 campsites; pavilion, boat launch,
playground, picnic tables, park store

County

Dixon Lake Public
Fishing Site

Boat launch fishing, swimming

Township

Pleasant View
Public Access Site

Otsego Lake used for swimming

Township

Otsego Co. Airport

Two Softball diamonds

Township

KOA Kampground

130 camping sites; swimming pool,
store, playground, movies,
miniature golf, hiking and bike
trails, laundry, restroom and
showers, playground

Private

Northland
Sportsman's Club

Skeet shooting, archery range,
rifle range, and meeting hall

Private

Norden Hem

cottages; cross-country ski
trails; horseback riding

Private

Ray MacMullen
Memorial Park

Five acre park donated to little
league; baseball fields, picnic tables

Michaywe'

18 hole public golf course,
downhill ski area with nine
slopes; seven miles of cross
country ski trails; travel trailer
resort with sixty densely wooded
acres for camping; store, playground
laundry, ice, showers, movies,
planned activities, miniature golf,
bike rental, open year-round

Private

Fireside Softball
diamonds

Two softball diamonds

Private

Dr. Roberts.
Libke Memorial
Fields

Three softball fields

County

30

�Approximately seven miles of
riding and bike trails; cross
country skiing trail in
southeastern part of the township

State

Riding &amp;
Hiking Trail

Horseback riding; hiking, crosscountry skiing (part of county
trail) approximately 14 miles in
township

State

Big Bear Lake

Public fishing site and camP,ground
including cottages

State

West Twin Lake

Public fishing site

State

JohannesburgLewiston High
School

Baseball/softball field, football
field, tennis courts, basketball
court, ice rink, play equipment, track

state

Big Lake

Public Fishing Site

State

Emerald Lake

Public Fishing Site

State

Big Bass Lake

Public Fishing Site

State

Lower Chub Lake

Public Fishing Site and
Campground

State

Riding and
Hiking Trail

Approximately nine mile trail
of hiking, riding and crosscountry skiing

State

Pigeon River
Forest Campgrounds

campsites in densely wooded
scenic area, fishing

State

Pickerel Lake

Trout, bass and panfishing;
camping, swimming, trout
fishing, camping, picnic tables

State

Pigeon Bridge
Forest Campgrounds

Trout fishing, camping picnic
tables

State

Public Fishing
Sites

on the sturgeon River at
Vanderbilt Road and the
Sturgeon Valley Road and other
locations; on the Black River
near Black River Road

State

Riding and
Hiking Trails

CHARLTON TOWNSHIP

CHESTER TOWNSHIP

CORWITH TOWNSHIP

31

�. J

Round Lake

campground and fishing area;
swimming

state

Pigeon River
State Forest

Scenic, densely wooded area
with numerous state campgrounds,
lakes, rivers, public fishing
areas; including several miles of
hiking or cross-country ski trails,
has the only elk herd east of the
Mississippi River

State

Ski resort with 12 downhill slopes
and cross-country ski trails;
hotel and lodge accommodations, golf
course currently under construction

Private

DOVER TOWNSHIP
Sylvan Resort

ELMIRA TOWNSHIP

Gaylord Country
Club

Privately owned club with 18 hole
golf course

Private

Elmira Elementary
School

Gymnasium, two softball diamonds,
playground

Gaylord
Community
School

Gaylord Schools'
Plantation

80 forested acres owned by
Gaylord School District,
forestry studies, hiking trails

Gaylord
Community
School

Wilderness Valley

18 hole public golf course;
cross-country skiing

Private

Lake Manuka

Public campground and
fishing sites

State

Public Fishing
Sites

Located on the Manistee Rivers
in the extreme southwest part
of the township

State

Frank H. Wilkinson
Roadside Park

Seven wooded acres with stream;
10 picnic tables located on US 27

State

Five Lakes Study
Area

Owned by the Gaylord School
District; 20 acres with
biological center, hiking trails

Gaylord
Community
Schools

HAYES TOWNSHIP

LIVINGSTON TOWNSHIP

32

�Otsego County
Fairgrounds

Five exhibit barns, race track,
horse barns, mid-way booths,
grandstand

County

Alpine Center

10 kilometers (6.2 miles) of
cross-country skiing

County

Hidden Valley
(Otsego Ski Club)

Membership only - 13 downhill
ski slopes, 8 miles of crosscountry ski trails, 18 hole
public golf course

Private

OTSEGO LAKE TOWNSHIP

Michaywe' Hills
Golf Course

Located partially in Bagley Twp.

Otsego Lake
State Park

62 acre park with 203 campsites,
1000' sand beach, boat access

State

Arbutus Beach

Private (residents) beach on
Otsego Lake

Private

Hear Lake

Public Fishing Site

State

Big Bradford
Lake

New camping sites presently
under construction
Public Fishing Site

Private
State

Lake Marjory

camping, public fishing site

State

Riding and Hiking
Trail

Approximately 8.5 miles of
state-owned trail for riding,
hiking and cross-country skiing

State

Edna Schotte
Memorial Park

Pavilion, picnic tables,
playground, hiking trails,
restrooms, grills, fountain

~

.

.

Private

Township

VILLAGE OF VANDERBILT
Vanderbilt
Memorial Park

Two tennis courts, playground
equipment, six picnic tables

Village

Vanderbilt
School

Indoor basketball court,
baseball diamond, football
field, hiking trails, forestry
study area, picnic area.

Vanderbilt
Schools

33

�CITY OF GAYLORD
(See Figure 8)
1

Alten Zimmer

Senior Citizens meeting place, square
dancing, recreational activities,
Housing units - subsidized

2

Aspen Park

Natural area, three picnic tables,
two tennis courts, hiking, crosscountry ski trails, wildlife pond

City

3

Freel Park

Picnic tables, grills and pavilion

City

4

Gaylord
Bowling Center

Bowling, three softball diamonds,
horseshoes

Private

5

Gaylord
Community
Center Area

6

Gaylord High
School

Basketball court (indoor);
baseball diamond, football
field, track

7

George Dumas
Park

Playground equipment, eight
picnic tables

City

8

Hale Park

Picnic tables and benches

City

9

Hockey Arena

Outdoor ice rink for hockey,
maintained by Hockey Association

City &amp;
Private

10

Monseigneur
Kaminski Park

Little League Field - St. Mary's

Private

11

North Ohio
Elementary

Playground, gymnasium, two
softball diamonds

12

Otsego
Health Club

Membership only, six racketball
courts, weightlifting, exercise
courses, racquetball, walleyball,
pool, two tennis courts

13

South Maple
Elementary

Playground and gymnasium

14

st. Mary's
School

Indoor basketball court,
baseball diamond, football
field, playground equipment

15

City Property

Numerous Soccer Fields

Indoor and outdoor facilities;
tennis, skating rink, pool tables,
ping-pong, etc.

34

Ot. County
Council on
Aging

City Of Gaylord
&amp; Otsego County
Gaylord
Community
Schools

Gaylord Comm.
Schools
Private

Gaylord
Community
Schools
Private

Gaylord Soccer Assoc.

�CITY RECREATIONAL PARKS ANO FACILITIES:

The City of Gaylord has four (4) parks within the City
limits; Aspen Park, Ooumas Park, Freel Park and Hale Park. The
City also has the land area surrounding Otsego County Community
Center and property located near Fairview Cemetery. With the
exception of Aspen Park, which contains 58.22 acres, the
remaining City parks range in size from less than a regulation
City lot to several City lots. The smallest of the parks is
Hale Park, located along Business Loop 27, consisting of some
trees, a picnic area and park benches. This park is viewed
mostly for it's ascetics value. Ooumas Park, ldcated at the
intersection of Fourth Street and South Maple Street, is used by
a large number of residents of the City, County and tourist
alike. This park provides picnic tables, playground equipment,
and is moderately wooded. Freel park, located between Huron and
Mitchell Street, is an open area providing both picnic areas and
additional playground equipment. With the recent addition of
the new playground equipment located at Freel Park, use has been
increased significantly. Aspen park, consisting of 58.22 acres,
is the most recent addition to the City Park system. As a
contingent upon purchase of the property for this park, the City
had to install two (2) tennis courts and name the park "Aspen
Park". This 100 acres was initially purchased in 1986 for two
reasons. These being the natural beauty of the area and the
City wastewater fac i lity needing an additional 30 acres as a
spare drain field.
In 1987, the City did install the two
required tennis courts to meet the deed restriction on the
property. In 1988, the City Planning Commission was given the
task of devising a Recreational Plan for the park. After much
discussion and study, the Planning Commission asked and received
help from the Soil Conservation Staff located at the Alpine
Center and Gaylord Public School System. Initially, the Soil
Conservation Staff did a complete inventory of the trees and
other physical characteristics of the park and provided a
significant findings of fact to the City Planning Commission.
Many of the items in the city Recreation Plan have been further
developed from this Soil Conservation study. It has been agreed
upon by the City Planning Commission and the Gaylord City
Council to keep the park as natural as possible. During the
summer of 1989, the Michigan Youth Corp was employed by the Soil
Conservation District to establish new walkways, clean up old
fencing and provide other work as dictated by the Soil
Conservation Staff.

35

�The Community Center land area, owned by the City, consists
of some very minor playground equipment, two tennis courts that
were constructed several years ago, and an outdoor basketball
court. This area is used during the winter for a skating rink
area. There is also a shuffle board located on the Community
Center property that has not been utilized in the past several
years. The Otsego County Community Center located on this
parcel of property has been recently renovated by County-wide
tax milage voted for this purpose.
Included within this
facility is a new indoor basketball court, ping-pong and other
games as such.
The area located across from Fairview Cemetery and directly
north of the North Ohio School has been utilized for several
recreational needs in the past. The current use includes an
unsheltered hockey arena operated by the Otsego County Hockey
Association. The area has also been used for BMX bikes,
baseball and soccer.

36

�RECREATION PROGRAMS
PROGRAM SPONSORS

PROGRAM NAME

Adult Education

Gaylord Community
Schools

Alpenfest

Chamber of Commerce

Bingo

Elks, Eagles, Knights
of Columbus,
st. Mary's Cathedral

Boating Safety

Sheriff's Dept.

Church Slow Pitch Softball

Church League ~ssoc.
&amp; Parks &amp; Recreation

Community Band
Community Education

Gaylord Community
Schools

Cross Country Ski Lessons

Wilderness Valley

Down-Hill Ski Lessons

Sylvan Resort and
Michaywe

Historical Society
4-H Program

Cooperative Extension

Horse Programs

4-H

Hunter Safety

Sheriff's Dept. &amp;
Sportsman Club

July 4th Festivities

Johannesburg,
Vanderbilt, Otsego
Lake Association

Little League Baseball,
Senior Div. League Minors League

Little League
Organization

Mark Mellon Memorial Triathlon - Summer

Alpine Striders

Medallion Snowmobile Marathon
(Winterfest)

Chamber of Commerce

Model Airplane Program

Unsponsored

Oktoberfest

Chamber of Commerce

37

�Otsego Health Club:
Aerobics, swimming, gymnastics,
Jr. Racketball program, Racketball
League, Wallyball Leagues

Private

Otsego Lake Fishing Contest

Northland Sportman's
Club

Senior Citizens

Council of Aging

Slow Pitch Softball

Slow Pitch Assoc. &amp;
Parks &amp; Recreation

Soccer

Alpine Youth Soccer
Association

Square Dancing

Council of Aging

Starker-Mann Biathlon

Chamber of Commerce

swimming Classes

Red Cross

Winterfest

Chamber of Commerce

Ice Skating Lessons

City of Gaylord

38

�CITY COUNCIL
Ernest Grocock, Mayor
Patrick Mankowski
William E. Thall
Luke E. Noss
Eugene Niedzwiecki
Scott Dunn
Tom Nelson

-·

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Sandra (Toni) Brown, Chairperson
Gerald Campbell
Norm Brecheisen
Kellie Galer
Leona (Sam) Titus
Maude Gilmore
Douglas Squires
Steve Swan
Terra Deming

39

�III.

ADMINISTRATION

The City of Gaylord is organized under the "Council Manager
Plan". Both operating and staff departments are under the
control and direction of an appointed manager. The City Manager
is ultimately responsible for ensuring recreation policy of the
City Council is carried out.
The City Planning Commission serves in an advisory capacity '
to the City Council. The function of the Planning Commission
includes, but is not limited to, all of the following functions:
Planning - to provide a systematic means of planning the
location, acquisition, development, and maintenance of a system
of parks, recreation and ·open space areas, facilities and
activities within the City. Definite criteria for inclusion
shall be adopted and revised periodically to keep pace with
changing demands and habit use patterns.
Development - to provide those activities and facilities
commensurate with the needs of the people. All development
should be carefully planned and be of a durable nature to
minimize maintenance.
Funding - to explore and utilize every means of financing that
is available to the Commission including federal and state
matching fund programs, general obl.i gation bonds, general funds,
fees and charges, if justified, and gifts and donations.
General Administration - to employ qualified and competent
personnel to achieve the above functions of the park systems,
and to maintain and establish the necessary procedures for
maintaining an accurate accounting of all funds utilized by the
Commission.
The City Manager recommends and the City Council approves
the annual budget for the Parks and Recreation Department. The
current budget for 1990-1991 is provided following this section.
Operation - to provide the necessary personnel to operate the
parks as effectively and efficiently as feasible. Adequate
supervision should be provided at all areas to protect the
facilities and to insure the equal opportunity for enjoyment of
all users.
Maintenance - all parks and facilities will be maintained in a
clean, neat, sanitary and orderly manner, to protect the public
health, safety and enjoyment of its users.

40

�Programming of the facilities is handled through the annual
operating budget which groups the Recreation Department as a
"General Fund" item. An important distinction to be made is
that the Parks ~nd Recreation Department function is not
confined to a user-charge, self sustaining mode, but are
provided on a City wide basis, and to outside residents at no
charge.
The City of Gaylord is the only City in Otsego County.
Serving as the County seat it is essential the City and County
work in close harmony. The County employs a full-time
recreation director. The careful utilization of funds dictate
this director utilize both City and County facilities.
This
arrangement has worked very well and will continue as long as
this utilization is succesful.
The Planning Commission makes their recommendations for
recreation planning directly to the City Council. The Planning
Commission initiates input from the citizens of Gaylord whether
it be through formal public hearings, notice through the local
media, which generates informal input, and task groups
consisting of planning members, school officials, soil
conservation experts and Gaylord citizens.
Through formal approval the City Council adopts recommendations
of the Planning Commission for recreational policy. By adopting
the annual budget the City Council approves the administration
of the recreation plan. To approve the annual budget a public
hearing must be held which allows citizens an additional
opportunity for input of recreation administration and policy.
The City Manager is responsible for the parks and recreation
administration once the annual budget is adopted. All
operations and maintenance must be carried out as the adopted
budget dictates. The public works foreman coordinates City
Public Works employees and volunteer efforts to ensure all
maintenance in the park system is completed systematically.
Part-time employees are hired for specific needs such as the ice
skating program and supplemental maintenance as dictated by the
City Manager.

METHODS OF MAINTENANCE AND RECREATION BUDGET
All maintenance and capital expenditures are funded by City
General Tax money. The budget is allocated from the operating
levy of the City of Gaylord annually. The amount of the annual
City Budget for parks and recreation varies depending on
projected capital purchases, such as land or new playground
equipment. Other funding sources are service clubs and private
donations from the area.
41

�CITY OF GAYLORD RECREATION PLANNING PROCESS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCT~E

Voting Ctt lzens

I
I

-'-

Mayor
City Council Members

~

I
I

_I_
Annual Budget

I

I

--------------'---------------I
I
I

I
_,_

_I_

City of Gaylord Planning/
Park Recreation Conmission

+'
r-'
Ul

City Manager/
Director of Parks and Recreation

I
I

-'-

Park Factl lty/
Maintenance

I
I
_,_

t-tj

H

::u

M

w

.

Public Works Department

C)

c-:

Volunteers

I
I

________ ,________
I
I

I
I

Ful 1 Ttme Staff

Part Tlme Staff

-'-

-'-

�PARKS

&amp;

RECREATION BUDGET

89-90

BUDGET

90-91

90-91

REQUESTED

APPROVED

EXPENDITURES
Salaries &amp; Wages
Fringe Benefits

$

5,000
0

$

5,500
2,200

$

5,500
2,200

Supplies

2,000

2,200

2,200

Materials

3,000

3,000

8,000

Contractual Services

1,000

5,000

0

0
0

0
1,000

0
1,000

Electric

200

200

200

Heat

100

0

0

4,000

4,000

4,000

0

0

0

Telephone Expense
Contractual Service

Equipment Rental
Land Purchase

TOTAL

$15,300

$ 22,100

$ 22,100

REVENUES
General Fund

$ 22.100

42

�IV.

DEFICIENCIES AND NEEDS

• conducted in January 1984 by the City of Gaylord
A survey was
and asked several questions pertaining to recreation as part of a
much longer survey. The 1984 City survey (January 1984) was
delivered to each household in the City of Gaylord.
It offered
residents an opportunity to "vote" on their preference as to several
options of recreational activities or to write in other recreational
facilities/activities that they preferred. As obtained from the
results, residents of Gaylord were mostly in favor of bicycle paths,
a city-owned swimming pool and an activity center for teenagers and
young adults. By contrast, residents also indicated that they were
most opposed to additional baseball diamonds and a city-owned
swimming pool.
Residents were also given the opportunity to write in a
recreational activity of their choice that they think the City ought
to provide. Although there was a wide range of answers, the most
common answers were for an ice skating rink and for tennis courts.
Some people were in favor of tennis courts in summer that could be
converted to an ice skating rink in winter.
The survey of 1984 conducted by the City of Gaylord had several
questions dealing with recreation. The preference for an activity
center, a city-owned swimming pool (the survey did not specify indoor
or outdoor), and bicycle paths were indicated to also be used for
hiking and cross-country skiing. Residents were most opposed to
additional baseball diamonds and lighting of a second baseball
diamond. Secondly, residents were opposed to a city-owned swimming
pool. Thus, residents are divided on the issue of a swimming pool
owned by the city.

43

�V. LONG RANGE GOALS

The role of the city of Gaylord is to acquire, develop and
maintain parks, recreation areas and open spaces.
In addition, Gaylord should plan and coordinate local
neighborhood and community facilities with cooperation of the County
and Schools. Cooperation with the state and federal planring and
coordinative activities is a necessity.
Coordination with the Gaylord Community Schools has included
adoption of a park-school concept of a park site adjacent to the
schools. Furthermore, Gaylord shall encourage ciose coordination
with local and county intermediate school districts responsible for
special education programs to extend their programs to include
leisure non-school activities and facilities for handicapped students
and their families.
The responsibility of administering the City Parks and
Recreation Program shall be that of the City administration. The
Planning Commission shall keep the City Council informed of its
programs, policies, procedures and objectives.

In addition, the goals of the City are:
- To provide recreational facilities that are accessible
to all residents.
- To provide recreation sites which will accommodate a
variety of activities for diverse interests as well as
diverse incomes.
- To provide park sites which will accommodate daily use.
- To provide a large enough facility so that residents
and tourists alike can be accommodated.
- To maintain communication between the Planning
Commission and the city Council.
- To maintain orderly economic/industrial growth so that
it is not detrimental to the natural environment of
the City and surrounding townships.

44

�I.
I

i.

I

44a

FIGURE 3

�VI.

SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES
Five Year Plan
ASPEN PARK

1991

Asphalt road to eliminate severe erosion
problems and provide easier access to
picnic areas.

$25,000
(2,000 Local)
(23,000 Grants)

1990

Erosion control and landscaping provided
around newly constructed tennis courts.

$5,000
(1,000 Local)
(4,000 Grants)

19901991

Walkways cleared for foot path only
(especially through hemlock area).

$2,000
(2,000 Local)

PLANTATIONS:
19901991

Establish interpretive area showcasing
managed and unmanaged stands, thin every
third row and prune to 17 feet to illustrate
wise forest management on a few acres, this
project coordinated with local school system.

$2,000
(2,000 Local)

MIXED HARDWOOD STANDS:
19911992

Trees, shrubs and groundcovers identified
along trails. Highlight signs of wildlife
(beaver cuts, wildlife dens, woodpecker
holes, etc.)

$1,000
(1,000 Local)

OPEN FIELDS:
19901991

Encourage deer and small animals by creating
food plots or mowing grass once per year. At
northeast opening, plant windbreak of shrubs
and conifers for cover.

$1,000
(1,000 Local)

1990

Prune trees in existing pathways to accommodate
bicycle paths, cross-country skiing and
hiking trails.

$16,000
$1,000 Local)
$15,000 Grants)

1993

Improve parking area for picnic area and tennis
area.

$2,000
(2,000 Local)

1990

Erect gates to limit access.

$2,000
(2,000 Local)

45

�-----

\

- · - PtitYK Bo1,n1olr~

--fwo1r'1cK ~M
--#ik.i~ 1rttil

45a

L _____.: .;

FIGURE 4

�1992

Construct erosion control barriers on
two-track going through plantation down
to pond area.

$1,250
(1,250 Local}

1990

Signs installed notating park name and park
rules.

$1,500
(1,500 Local)

1990

Mark all corner survey points to better
illustrate property boundary lines.

19901995

Purchase property to boundary line to include
all of Scott's pond and along boundary to
further preserve natural beauty of the area.. -.

Donation
$300,000
(225,000 Grants)
(75,000 Local)

DOUMAS PARK

1992

Additional picnic tables.
(Utilizing recycled plastic)

$2,000
(500 Local)
(1,000 Grants)
(500 Donations)

19901991

Landscape new playground equipment.

$500
(500 Local)

19901991

Reseed grass.

$250
(250 Local)

19901995

Purchase additional playground equipment.
(Toddler)

$12,000
(2,000 Local}
(10,000 Grants)

1991

Replace drinking fountain.

$450
(450 Local)

19941995

Pave parking lot.
(Correct erosion problem)

$10.000
(2,000 Local)
(8,000 Grants)

46

��FREEL PARK
19921993

Purchase more playground equipment to be
placed at south end of the park.
(Toddler)

$15,000
(2,000 Local)
(13,000 Grants)

19901995

Continue to landscape entire area.

$2,500
(2,500 Local)

1992

Additional picnic tables.
(Utilizing recycled plastic)

$2,000
(500 Local)
(1,000 Grants)
(500 Donations)

HALE PARK
19911992

Replace park benches and picnic tables using
table and benches manufactured from recycled
products.

$3,000
(3,000 Local)

1991

Continue to landscape.

$750
(750 Local)

1992

Drinking fountain.

$500
(500 Local)

47

�fral ~vk.

�47b

�The staff would like to extend our "thanks" to the following for
their help in compiling the Recreation Plan.

citizens of Gaylord
City Council
City Planning Commission
Gaylord Community Schools
Michigan Employment Security Commission
Northeast Michigan Council of Governments
Otsego County Parks and Recreation
Otsego County Planning Commission
Otsego County Soil Conservation District

48

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008359">
                <text>Gaylord_Recreation-Plan_1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008360">
                <text>City of Gaylord Planning Commission, City of Gaylord, Otsego County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008361">
                <text>1990-06-14</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008362">
                <text>City of Gaylord 1990/1995 Recreation Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008363">
                <text>The City of Gaylord 1990/1995 Recreation Plan was prepared by the City of Gaylord Planning Commission and was adopted on June 14, 1990.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008364">
                <text>Recreation--planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008365">
                <text>Gaylord (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008366">
                <text>Otsego County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008367">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008369">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008370">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008371">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008372">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038329">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54714" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58985">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/289ce43f5cfe6f4d2ebd2437a1025c93.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6520c60ed40c562f0bf382b8e66c642f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008525">
                    <text>CITY OF GRAYLING
AND
GRAYLING TOWNSHIP

MASTER PLAN

�CITY OF GRAYLING
and
GRAYLING TOWNSHIP
MASTER PLAN

Prepared by:

City of Grayling City Council
and the

Grayling Township Planning Commission
with assistance of the

Grayling Township Board of Trustees
and the Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.
302 S. Waverly, Lansing 48917

1997

�City of Grayling/Grayling Township Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents
Chapter One: Introduction
Plan Purpose .................................................................................................... 1-1
Plan Contents and How To Use The Plan ....................................................... 1-2
Plan Preparation ............................................................................................... 1-3

Chapter Two: Community Character
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2-1
Resort Community In The Midst of Forest ..................................................... 2-1
AuSable Riverfront .......................................................................................... 2-1
Downtown Business/Retail Center .................................................................. 2-2
Neighborhoods ................................................................................................ 2-5
Industrial Development ................................................................................... 2-5
Natural and Physical Features ......................................................................... 2-7
Historic and Cultural Resources ...................................................................... 2-7

Chapter Three: Trends and Conditions
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3-1
Population ........................................................................................................ 3-1
Economic ........................................................................................................ 3-3
Projections ....................................................................................................... 3-3
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Table of Contents

,

-

-

'

�ii

Chapter Four: Existing Land Use
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4-1
Natural Resources ................................................................................. 4-2

Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 5-1
Public Lands .................................................................................................... 5-1
Industrial Development Between the City of Grayling and Four Mile Road
at the 1-75 Interchange ..................................................................................... 5-3
Development Along Four Mile Road .............................................................. 5-4
Trail Connections ............................................................................................ 5-5
Affordable Housing ......................................................................................... 5-6
Appearance ...................................................................................................... 5-7
Old Bear Archery ............................................................................................ 5-8
Military Airport ............................................................................................... 5-9
Downtown Development ................................................................................. 5-9
Update Zoning Maps to be Consistent with Plan ............................................ 5-10

Chapter Six: Vision Statement, Goals and Objectives
Introduction ..................................... ~ ............................................................... 6-1
A Vision for Grayling's Future - Introduction ................................................ 6-1
Vision Statement .................................................................................. 6-1
Goals and Objectives - Introduction ................................................................ 6-4
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Table of Contents

�iii

Chapter Seven: Future Land Use
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 7-1
Planning and Design Principles ................................ .................................... ... 7-2
Protection of Public Health and Safety ................................................ 7-2
Conservation of Sensitive Natural Resources ...................................... 7-3
Environmental Protection ..................................................................... 7-3
Minimizing Public Service Costs ......................................................... 7-3
Efficiency and Convenience in Meeting Land Use Needs ................... 7-3
Insuring Compatibility Between Land Uses ........................................ 7-4
Sustaining a Job Base Adequate to Support Families .......................... 7-4
Applying Planning Principles ............................................................... 7-4
Community Character ............................................................... 7-4
Development ............................................................................. 7 -4
Tourism ..................................................................................... 7-5
Blending the Resort Areas with the Year-Round
Community ............................................................................... . 7-5
Year-Round Employment/Industrial Development .................. 7-5
Future Land Use .............................................................................................. 7-5
Land use Policies ............................................................................................. 7 -7
Policies ............................................................................................................ 7 -7
Environmentally Sensitive Areas ......................................................... 7-7
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Table of Contents

�iv

High Fire Risk Areas ............................................................................ 7-7
Waterfront Areas ............................................................... ................... 7-8
Other Residential Areas ........................................................................ 7-8
Commercial Areas ................................................................................ 7 -8
Industrial Areas .................................................................................... 7-9
Park &amp; Recreation ................................................................................ 7-9
Institutional Areas ................................................................................ 7-9
Public Lands ......................................................................................... 7-10
Community Character .......................................................................... 7-10

Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Coordination Plan
Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................. 8-1
Overview of Public Services ........................................................................... 8-1
Policy Basis .......................................................................................... 8-1
Full and Partial Urban Public Services Provision ........................................... 8-2
Urban Services ..................................................................................... 8-2
Partial Urban Services .......................................................................... 8-2
Individual Public Service Components ........................................................... 8-3
Streets and Related Transportation ....................................................... 8-3
Sewer and Water .................................................................................. 8-4
S tormwater Management ..................................................................... 8-6

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Table of Contents

�V

Support Services and Buildings ........................................................... 8-7
Recreation Strategy .............................................................................. 8-7
Intergovernmental Coordination ..................................................................... 8-8

Chapter Nine: Implementation
Primary Implementation Tools ........................................................................ 9-1
Relationship to Zoning ......................................................................... 9-1
Relationship to Subdivision and Condominium Regulations ............... 9-2
Relationship to Capital Improvements ................................................. 9-2
Land Use &amp; Infrastructure Policies ...................................................... 9-3
Housing Program .................................................................................. 9-3
Building and Property Maintenance Codes .......................................... 9-3
Public Works Financing .................................................................................. 9-3
Additional Implementation Methods ............................................................... 9-4
Other Planning &amp; Economic Development Assistance ........................ 9-4
Managing Growth and Change ............................................................. 9-4
Periodic Updating and Revisions ......................................................... 9-5
Revisions of Ordinances ....................................................................... 9-5

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Table of Contents

�City of Grayling/Grayling Township Comprehensive Plan
List of Figures and Tables
Figures
Photo 1 City of Grayling ................................................................. :.............. 2-3
Photo 2 Few Buildings Taller then Two Stories ............................................ 2-3
Photo 3 AuSable a Premier Fishing and Canoeing River.. ............................. 2-4
Photo 4 Canoeing Boat Liveries ..................................................................... 2-4
Photo 5 First Impression to Travelers ............................................................ 2-6
Photo 6 Storefronts in the Business Section ................................................... 2-6
3-1 Wage and Salary Employment by Sector Crawford County 1983-1994 . 3-4

Tables
3-1 Crawford County Local Units Population, 1980 - 1994 .......................... 3-2
3-2 Crawford County Age Distribution, 1990 ................................................ 3-2
3-3 Crawford County Poverty Characteristics,- 1990 .................................... 3-4
3-4a Projected Population Change in Grayling City and Township, 1980 2020 ................................................................................................................. 3-6
3-4b Projected Population Change in Grayling City and Township, 1990 2020 ................................................................................................................. 3-6

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
List of Figures and Tables

�City of Grayling/Grayling Township Comprehensive Plan
List of Maps
2-1 Community Character .............................................................................. 2-9
2-2 Fire Risk Areas ......................................................................................... 2-10
4-1 Existing Land Use Grayling Township .................................................... 4-4
4-2 Existing Land Use City of Grayling ......................................................... 4-5
4-3 Public Facilities Grayling Township ........................................................ 4-6
4-4 Public Facilities Use City of Grayling ..................................................... 4-7
4-5 Natural Features Grayling Township ....................................................... 4-8
4-6 Natural Features Grayling Township ....................................................... 4-9
5-1 Public Lands in Grayling Township ........................................................ 5-12
5-2 Recreational Trails in Grayling Township ............................................... 5-13
7-1 Grayling Township Future Land Use ........................................................ 7-12
7-2 City of Grayling Future Land Use ............................................................. 7-13
8-1 Recreational Facilities in Grayling Township ........................................... 8-10

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
List of Maps

�1- l

Chapter One
INTRODUCTION
PLAN PURPOSE
The purpose of this Master Plan is to guide policy and decision making for all
future land and infrastructure development decisions within the City of
Grayling/Grayling Township. Within the Plan, key planning issues are identified;
community character is described; goals, objectives and policies are outlined;
existing and future land uses are described and mapped; public facility standards
are established; visual character improvements are identified and specific
implementation measures are recommended.
This Plan is adopted by the City of Grayling City Council to promote community
health, safety, and welfare through planning for the proper use of land and
resources and the provision of adequate public facilities and services. The
Grayling Township Planning Commission adopts this plan for similar purposes
and pursuant to authority in the Township Planning Act, PA 168 of 1959. This
Act requires the adoption of a "basic plan" to serve as the basis for zoning
regulations adopted pursuant to PA 184 of 1943. The City of Grayling/Grayling
Township Master Plan depends primarily on the City's and Township's respective
Zoning Ordinances, Subdivision Regulations, and Capital Improvement Programs
for its implementation. Although this Plan states specific land use and
development policy and proposes specific land use arrangements, it has no
regulatory power.
The land area covered by this Plan includes the entire area of the City of Grayling
and all of Grayling Township. To ensure continued improvement in quality of life
and to plan for growth that benefits the residents of both the City and Township,
this plan was prepared and adopted jointly. Since the future land use of lands
adjacent to each jurisdiction affect the quality of life in the other and each
jurisdiction has no regulatory land use authority beyond their respective borders,
each is dependent on the other to implement land use change along borders in
ways that are mutually beneficial.
All proposed future land uses and policies presented in this Plan were developed
based on a blending of:
• The natural capability of the land to sustain certain types of development; the
important natural functions played by unique land and water resources in the
area
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter One: Introduction

�1-2

•
•
•

The relative future need for residential, commercial, and industrial land uses; as
well as the existing land use distribution.
The relationship of undeveloped lands to existing community character
The desires of local residents and public officials as expressed through
interviews, town meetings, and public hearings.

This Plan is intended as support for the achievement of the following public
objectives, among others:
• To protect public health, safety and general welfare;
• To conserve and protect property values by preventing incompatible uses from
locating adjacent to each other;
• To protect and enhance quality of life in the City and Township;
• To protect and preserve the natural resources, unique visual character, and
environmental quality of the area;
• To maintain and enhance employment opportunities and tax base of the area;
• To promote an orderly development process which is paced in coordination
with the City's and Township's ability to provide services and which permits
public officials and citizens an opportunity to monitor change and review
proposed development in a reasonable manner; and
• To provide information from which to gain a better understanding of the area
and its interdependencies and interrelationships, and upon which to base future
land use and public investment decisions.

PLAN CONTENTS and HOW TO USE THE PLAN
There are three critical components to using this Plan as a decision making guide.
• First, are the goals, objectives and policies in Chapter Six. These are based on
public input and reflect where citizens want their community to be over the
next twenty to twenty-five years. The condition of the community now, and
recent trends of population size, age and other characteristics, as well as
economic, infrastructure and natural resource conditions form the foundation
for planned change of the community. These trends and conditions are
discussed in Chapters Two through Five prior to the goals, objectives and
policies.
• Second is the future land use map, public facilities plan and associated
descriptive information presented in Chapter Seven and Chapter Eight.
• Third, are the implementation strategies found in Chapter Nine.
This Plan is presented to help all elected and appointed officials to make difficult
choices between competing interests and to serve as a guide for decision making.
It is anticipated that this Plan will be consulted in the following situations:

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter One: Introduction

�1-3

•

Review of rezonings, variances, and special use permits: Applications for
rezoning, variances, or special use permits should be evaluated not only in
terms of specific zoning ordinance standards, but also in terms of how well the
proposed action would help attain the goals and objectives of this Plan and
fulfill its policies.

•

Public improvement projects: All future public improvement projects,
including the construction of new facilities, utilities or buildings, should first be
reviewed for consistency with this Plan. In particular, such projects should be
reviewed to determine consistency with the goals, objectives and policies in the
plan, and whether they support the planned future land use pattern in the City,
and Township as set forth in this Plan.
Review of land subdivision and lot splits: The subdivision of land and
associated lot split activities has potentially profound impact upon the character
of a community and future public service needs and tax burdens. This Plan
provides policies to assist the City Council, Township Planning Commission
and Township Board regarding decisions about the appropriateness of proposed
subdivisions and lot splits, and the adequacy of public services to address the
increased demands associated with new subdivisions and lot splits.

This Plan is a statement by the City and Township regarding the intended future
character of the community and strategies to assure that character. As a formal
and tangible document, this Plan is intended to instill a sense of stability and
direction for City and Township officials, City and Township activities, and
Grayling area citizens.

PLAN PREPARATION
The Planning Process
The planning process used in developing the City of Grayling/Grayling Township
Master Plan included a joint meeting of the City Council, Township Planning
Commission and Township Board, mapping, data analysis, consideration of
alternative development options in various parts of the City and Township, two
Town Meetings, and one joint public hearing.
At the first Town Meeting, an overview of current economic and demographic
trends and issues was presented, and a ''futuring" session was conducted in which
citizens of the Grayling area were asked to visualize Grayling 20-25 years in the
future as they wanted it to be. This resulted in citizens articulating their vision and
desires for their community. Key issues which surfaced during this Town Meeting
included community character, the area's economic health and the preservation of
the area's natural resources. The combined results of the futuring session, an
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter One: Introduction

�1-4

analysis of economic and demographic trends, and key problems and opportunities
identified by Township and City Officials, were used to determine the issues to be
addressed by the Master Plan.
Draft goals and objectives were developed from the public vision statements
generated at the first Town Meeting. These were refined by Township and City
Officials. Key issues were researched and alternative land use arrangements and
policies were considered before a future land use pattern was selected.
A draft Plan was prepared and refined with input from the Township Planning
Commission, Township Board and City Council. A second Town Meeting was
held June 2, 1997. Additional refinements were made based on the public input.
The draft Plan was presented to the public at a public hearing on September 16,
1997 following which it was adopted by the City Council and Township Planning
Commission.

station8:\winword\grayling\graychl .doc

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter One: Introduction

�2-l

Chapter Two
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
INTRODUCTION
Community character is the visual identity of the community. It is made up of land
forms, the types, use and styles of its buildings, the pattern of its streets, signs,
vegetation and natural and cultural landmarks. A desirable community character is
important to citizen satisfaction and to business success. The Master Plan and
related regulations are created in part to protect and improve community character.
Areas with similar visual characteristics in the Grayling area are identified on Map
2-1. As future guidelines, policies or ordinances are developed to address visual ·
character, their application should be directed to those similar areas shown on the
map.

RESORT COMMUNITY IN THE MIDST OF FOREST
The Grayling Area is made up of the City of Grayling (Photo 1), a small scenic
city in the northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan. It is ringed by small scale
commercial and industrial development along M-72, M-93, Old US 27, and at the
Four-Mile Road exit of I-75 (an interstate highway), beyond which is a largely
rural area of forests and scattered residential dwellings.
The developed area of private land has been characterized as the "hole in the
donut" of publicly owned state forest and military land. The City of Grayling is
primarily residential, with few buildings taller than two stories (Photo 2),
commercial areas in strips and pockets along the major streets, and a concentrated
older downtown. The clear waters of the world renowned AuSable River wind
through the City. The AuSable is a premiere fishing and canoeing river. (Photo 3).
Several canoe liveries occupy the riverbanks. The City has a rich history as a small
lumbering and resort town. It still serves as a resort service center. The area is also
known for the Hartwick Pines State Park and Camp Grayling military training
camp for National Guard Units from several states.

AUSABLE RIVERFRONT
The AuSable River flows through Grayling Township and the City of Grayling. In
addition to the main branch, there are also the South and East Branches. The
AuSable Riverfront has the following characteristics:
• Homes, on lots that are 100' to 300' feet wide, set back between 50' and 150'
from the river, a few businesses and some undeveloped areas along the river
segments in both the City and the Township.
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two: Community Character

�2-2

•

Some of the lots remain in a relatively natural condition while a few have
cleared shorelines, on which lawns have been planted.
• Small portions of the riverfront are in public ownership (City. State and
Federal), but most of it is privately owned.
• The AuSable River has been recognized as a national treasure and a pristine
stream, which magnifies the importance of its long term protection.
• Large portions of the main branch and the North Branch of the AuSable are
included in the Michigan Natural Rivers Program, which includes certain
regulations (minimum setbacks, greenbelts, etc.) on development along the
river.
• Canoeing boat liveries occupy prominent spots along the river in the City
(Photo 4).
• There are a few log cabins but the architecture of the riverfront buildings
generally do not reflect any particular theme.
• The river is largely hidden from view by a narrow river size, structures, high
banks or lack of close public access to the river.
• There are both inhabited and uninhabited segments of the AuSable River
outside of the City, within the Township.
• Uninhabited riverbanks are typically wooded, with thick undergrowth. Trees
primarily include various pine species and birch.
• In some locations the riverbank is a low bank, while in others there is a steep
bank upwards of one hundred feet high. Portions of the riverbank are broad
wetlands both east and west of the City of Grayling.

DOWNTOWN BUSINESS/RETAIL CENTER
There are four distinct commercial areas to Grayling, and these are not clearly
identified to the traveler as being either inside or outside the City limits. These are
the:
• Strip commercial area north of the 1-75 entrance to the City from the south on
South 1-75 Business Loop
• The older downtown business area on Michigan A venue that runs
perpendicular to the 1-75 Business Loop (James Street)
• The commercial area beginning in the City and running north along the I-7 5
Business Loop into the Township and beyond into Fredric Township
• The M-72 commercial strip running west toward Lake Margarethe from the
intersection of M-72 and the 1-75 Business Loop (James Street) in the City.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two: Community Character

�2-3

Photo 1

Photo 2

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two: Community Character

�2-4

Photo 3

Photo 4

City of Gra 1 ling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two : Community Character

�2-5

The four commercial areas share the following characteristics:
They all suffer visually from a chaotic appearance and a poor quality of design
of signs, buildings and landscaping. While it is not desirable that all buildings,
signs and landscaping look alike, or "theme-like," design in Grayling needs
greater unity, greater use of detail, more use of local materials, finer
workmanship, greater simplicity, more lush landscaping and more rigorous
maintenance in order to improve quality of the first impression given to
travelers (Photo 5).
• Grayling merchants effectively express the admirable qualities of individualism
and a do-it-yourself approach. However, the resultant, sometimes amateurish,
often chaotic appearance may translate into a poor competitive position
(compared to other communities where greater attention to physical design and
appearance is practiced) and hence, a poorer quality of life for the people of
Grayling.
• While the Gray ling area is surrounded by large areas of forest and other
vegetation, there is little landscaping within the commercial areas. Vegetation
is generally sparse or of a size or character that does not contribute to a
memorable impression of Gray ling.

NEIGHBORHOODS
There are several residential neighborhoods in the Gray ling area. While a few are
distinct, due to differences in age, tree cover and that they are located along Lake
Margarethe or the AuSable River, the neighborhoods within the City have some
similarities in appearance and share the following characteristics:
• They are generally comprised of small to medium sized homes and
architectural style ranges from ranch to colonial to rustic, log.
• Homes in many sections of the City are well kept, but there are exceptions, in
which homes and yards suffer from neglect. This is also a characteristic of
some of the homes in portions of the Township abutting the City (especially on
the southeast side).
• Home owners have, in many cases, made improvements to their homes which
do not follow the style of the original home. While these improvements
generally contribute to the livability and function of each home, they can
contribute to a less unified appearance.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
Industries in the Grayling area are largely located in two discrete areas, with
additional, small industrial sites in scattered locations within or close to the City.
About a dozen small to medium sized industries are located in the industrial park
within the City of Grayling, just east of I-75. The larger industrial operations are
located on either side of Four Mile Road, with the larger paper and chemical plants
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two: Community Character

�2-6

Photo 5

Photo 6

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two: Community Character

�2-7

located on the south side of the road in Beaver Creek Township. Small, isolated
industries are located along North Down River Road near the I-75 interchange.
Characteristics of the industrial areas are:
• Businesses within the industrial park are mostly in well-kept metal buildings,
with open grounds and on-site storage areas.
• While some business have installed small ornamental plantings for
beautification, pride and enjoyment of employees, more effective, large-scale,
road-side screening and windbreaks would be appropriate.

NATURAL AND PHYSICAL FEATURES
Grayling Township comprises the area of five standard townships (the largest
south of the Mackinac Bridge). The bulk of the Township is in public ownership
and remains undeveloped. This contributes to a very natural appearance to the
Grayling area and to the perception that natural resources are a very important
element of life in Grayling. Important natural features include:
• The forests surrounding Grayling are the most visible natural resource feature.
The forest is primarily pine with birch and aspen as additional species. Pine is
both an asset and a potential liability, especially Jack Pine. Jack Pine tree
stands are the most prone to fire. A fire in 1990 quickly burned 6,000 acres in
less than 24 hours, destroying or damaging 75 homes and over 100
outbuildings. See Map 2-2 for the most fire-prone areas of the Township.
• The forests are held in State (AuSable State Forest, Hartwick Pines State Park,
Hanson Military Reservation), Federal (Huron National Forest) and private
ownership.
• There is some timber cutting on the State Forest land and these lands are also
used extensively for recreation.
• The AuSable River flows through Grayling Township and the City of Grayling,
heading east to Lake Huron. The AuSable is nationally known as one of the
finest canoeing and trout fishing rivers in North America.
• There are large areas of wetlands and lowland forest. While these areas help
foster an abundant wildlife population, they also pose building constraints.
• Soils within the City and Township are generally sandy, although mucks and
other soil types exist. Many of the sandy soils permit rapid percolation of water
and pollution on or near the surface can pose a threat to groundwater.
• The topography around the City is generally fairly flat. However there are steep
slopes in isolated parts of the Township, and there are bluffs along many
segments of the AuSable River.
HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
The region's history is strongly related to lumbering, which flourished in the mid
to late nineteenth century. From the region, logs could be floated east down the
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two: Community Character

�2-8

AuSable River and further west down the Manistee River (not within Grayling
Township). Features relating to the history of the area which remain include:
• The large homes of several lumber barons remain on Peninsular Street.
Nineteenth century and early twentieth century storefronts remain in the
business section (Photo 6).
• Hartwick Pines State Park, located just north of the City, in the northern part of
the Township, is the last remaining stand of virgin white pine in the lower
peninsula of Michigan. The Park contains a lumbering museum and displays
big-wheel log carriers, artifacts of the lumbering industry.
• The landscape of the Township, while largely rural in appearance, shows that
lumbering once took place in the region. Where there is forest cover, it is
second growth--not mature. The forest is still recovering from fires in the last
century that occurred during or following forest clearing for timber harvest.
Regrowth takes a long time on the poorer, sandy soils that are characteristic of
much of the region. There are also many clearings where fires have occurred
within the last fifty years, or where the forest has remained cleared due to
failed farming attempts.
• Other historic structures, especially homes, are scattered along the AuSable and
in older City neighborhoods. No large concentrations of historic structures
remams.
station 8:\winword\grayling\graych2.doc

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two : Community Character

�Map 2-1

GRAYLING TOWNSHIF
City of Grayling &amp;
. Grayling Township
Master Plan Project
North~

Public Lands (State and Federal)

~tE::;

Privately Owned Land

-

City of Grayling Boundary

• Grayling Township Boundary

'&amp;
NTIAL

it

1!

*
*

MAJOR NODES

MINOR NODES

�2-9

Map 2-1
Community Character

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two: Community Character

�2-10

Map 2-2
Fire Risk Areas

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Two: Community Character

�3-1

Chapter Three
TRENDS AND CONDITIONS
INTRODUCTION
The existing conditions of the City of Grayling and Grayling Township reflect
considerable growth over the past two decades. The attraction of northern Michigan has
brought new people and businesses to the Grayling area, and it has also brought many
more people through Grayling on their way to other northern tourist, retirement and
second home locations. This chapter examines what those changes have been, and what
changes there might still be if recent trends continue into the future. Most of the data
presented was compiled by the Northeast Michigan Council of Governments.
POPULATION
The City of Grayling grew 8.5% to 1,944 persons between 1980 and 1990. Grayling
Township grew at a rate of 40.5 % to 5,647 persons in the same period. Altogether, 1780
more persons lived in the City and Township in 1990 compared to 1980. This is 63.7% of
the total population growth in the County during this period.
Forty-six percent of all the people living in Crawford County resided in Grayling
Township in 1990, while 16% lived in the City of Graying.
Population estimates provided by the Michigan Department of Management and Budget
and the U.S. Bureau of the Census through the Federal-State Cooperative Program for
Population Estimates place the populations of the City and Township at 2,259 and 5,994
in 1994 respectively. See Table 3-1. These estimates show population growth in the City
at an increased rate (8.5%) for the City and at a slower rate for the Township (6.1 %)
between 1990 and 1994. Together, there are an estimated 499 new residents residing in
the City and Township together since 1994.
Both the City and the Township have over a quarter of their populations under 25 years of
age. While communities in the northern tier of counties of Michigan generally have a
high percentage of the population 65 years or older, Grayling Township had only 11.9%
of the population 65 years of age or older. This is close to the State average of about 12%.
The City of Grayling has an older population, with 20.9% 65 years of age or older. See
Table 3-2.
The populations of the City and Township are over 94% white. Blacks, Native Americans
and Hispanics comprise most of the non-white population.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Three: Trends and Conditions

�Table 3-1
CRAWFORD COUNTY LOCAL UNITS
POPULATION: 1980 - 1994
1990
POP.

MUNICIPALITY

1980
POP.

1990
POP.

1994
POP.

MUNICIPALITY

Crawford Cotmty

9,465

12,260

13,387

Grayling Twp.

4,019

5,647

5,994

Beaver Creek
Twp.

745

1,175

1,297

Lovells Twp.

316

420

408

Frederic Twp.

1,142

1,287

1,408

Maple Forest
Twp.

355

407

443

Grayling City

1,792

1,944

2.259

S. Branch Twp.

1,096

1,380

1,578

1980
POP.

1994
POP.

Source: 1980 and 1990: U.S. Bureau of the Census; 1994: Population estimates developed by the U.S. Bureau of
the Census through the Federal-State Cooperative Program for Population Estimates. Population estimates
are approximations, and are not accurate to the last digit reported.

Table 3-2
CRAWFORD COUNTY
AGE DISTRIBUTION - 1990
MUNICIPALITY

&lt;5
Yrs.

%*

5-17
Yrs.

%*

18-24
Yrs.

%*

25-44
Yrs.

%•

45-64
Yrs.

%*

65 Yrs.
&amp;&gt;

%*

Beaver Creek Twp.

70

6.0

224

19.1

79

6.7

348

29.6

285

24.2

169

14.4

Frederic Township

94

7.3

277

21.5

97

7.5

384

29.8

272

.21.l

163

12.7

Grayling City

161

8.3

352

18.1

175

9.0

509

26.2

341

17.5

406

20.9

Grayling Township

445

7.9

1,082

19.2

516

9.1

1,853

32.8

1,098

19.4

653

11.6

Lovells Twp.

12

2.9

38

9.0

27

6.4

82

19.5

126

30.0

135

32.1

Maple Forest Twp.

28

6.9

82

20.l

29

7.1

105

25.8

102

25.l

61

15.0

S. Branch Twp.

91

6.6

245

17.7

84

6.1

352

25.5

368

26.7

240

17.4

Crawford C0tmty

901

1.3

2.300

18.8

1,007

8.2

3,633

29.6

2,592

21.1

1,827

Source: U.S. Bureau of lbe Census
•
Figure shows lbe percentage each age grouping represents of the local unit's total population.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Three : Trends and Conditions

I

l

i

14.9 :

�3-3

There are 390 persons between the ages of 16 and 64 in the Grayling area with work
disabilities, and 166 persons in the same age group unable to work due to disabilities. The
percentage of persons between the ages of 16 and 64 with work disabilities is 15% in the
City of Grayling and 7 .3% in Grayling Township. The percentage of persons in the same
age group unable to work are 6.7% and 3.0% respectively.
The Grayling area has a relatively low household size compared to the rest of the State.
The number of persons per household was 2.66 in 1990 for the City of Grayling and 2.95
for Grayling Township. These represent declines of -9 % and -28 % between 1980 and
1990 respectively.

ECONOMIC
The City of Grayling and Grayling Township show signs of distressed economic
conditions among its population.
• The median family income for both the City ($20,906) and the Township ($28,750) is
below the State average (($36,652).
• The City of Grayling's poverty rate (26.2%) of all persons was higher than the State
average of 13.1 %, but Grayling Township's rate (8.1 %) was lower. (See Table 3-3.)
Employment is high in the Grayling area, as it is state wide in 1996. There are 670 and
2954 persons employed in the City and Township respectively. According to NEMCOG
figures for 1990, the largest employment sector is service. This sector is highly dependent
on the hospital for its large numbers. Government employment is also a large sector, as is
retail. The National Guard base and training facility and county government contributes
to the size of the government sector. See Figure 3-1 for employment figures by sector for
the County from 1983-1992.

PROJECTIONS
If population continues to grow at the rate between 1980 and 1990, the population in the
City of Grayling will be 2,400 in the year 2020; a 23% increase from 1990. If the
explosive growth in the Township between 1980 and 1990 were to continue, the
Township population would rise to 10,531 persons in 2020; and 86% increase from 1990
(see Table 3-4). In contrast, if population were to increase at the rate between 1990 and
1994, then the City population in 2020 would be 4,307 (a 122% increase) and in the
Township it would be 8,250 (a 46% increase). It is most reasonable to assume a rate of
population growth between these two projections. For example, the state as a whole is
projected to grow about 11.8% between 1990 and 2020.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Three: Trends and Conditions

�Table 3-3
CRAWFORD COUNfY
POVERTY CHARACTERISTICS: 1990
Percent below
poverty:
MUNICIPALITY

Persons 65 yrs. &amp; &gt;

All Persons

Female Households
with children &lt; 18 yrs.

Beavez Creek Township

14.4%

6.5%

73.3%

Frederic Township

18.7%

7.2%

85.7%

Grayling City

26.2%

27.4%

59.4%

Grayling Township

8.1%

7.8%

25.9%

Lovells Township

18.0%

15.9%

71.4%

Maple Forest Township

21.1%

4.4%

0.0%

S. Branch Township

17.2%

10.8

36.4%

Crawford County

14.6%

11.8%

47.3%

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census

Figure 3-1

WAGE &amp; SALARY EMPLOYMENT BY SECTOR
CRAWFORD COUNTY: 1983 - 1992
.., .......·"-...

1200

/ '

.--r··_,,/--4

,...,,,,._____,.._..--/'

1000

Jj

··...

r---

-· •· · Mining/Const

.~,;

- - Retail
✓------- .... - - - - - - - - -

800

400

200

Lepnd

--- Mfg.

,✓••

800

tld

I

··..

------------

____ J

/

/

/

-

Serv.

-

Govt.

_ _. . , _ _ _ _ . . . - - - - - _ .__ ••• ---►- ......... -·
•• - - -- -·.

-----►• - -- - -

p• - ---- ~--· ..... ,

0 ......__..----.-----r--......---------~-,--Grapldc l,y NEJ,tCOG

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Three : Trends and Conditions

�3-5

If employment trends between 1985 and 1995 were to continue, Township employment

would more than double to 5,469 persons and persons employed within the City would
fall to zero. However, the City trend line is implausible and greatly affected by the closing
of the Bear Archery plant. Since the City has an industrial park, available utilities and
private property well located for jobs producing redevelopment, it is likely to modestly
increase its employment while the Township is unlikely to realize significant employment
gains without utilities and more private land appropriately sited for development. As a
result, significant City-Township cooperation in pursuit of new job development will be
necessary in order for both to be successful.
For additional information and analysis on these and related socio-economic data, please
consult Northeastern Michigan Growth Trends, published by the Northeast Michigan
Council of Governments, P.O. Box 457, Gaylord, MI 49735, Phone (517) 732-3551.

st.ation8 :\ winword\gray ling\graych3 .doc

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Three : Trends and Conditions

�Table 3-4 A
Projected Population Change in Grayling City and Township, 1980-2020
Total Percent
Change Change

1980

Community

1990

19801990

19801990

Total
Change

Percent
Change

2000

2010

2020

19902020

19902020

GRAYLING CITY

1,792

1,944

152

8%

2,096

2.2-18

2,400

456

23%

GRAYLING TOWNSHIP

4,019

5,647

1,628

41%

7,275

8.903

10,531

.J,88-t

86%

Projections are straight line based on /980-/990 data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Table 3-4 B
Projected Population Change in Grayling City and Township, 1990-2020
Total Percent
Change Change

Total Percent
Change Change

19902020

19902020

1990

Est.
1994

19901994

19901994

2000

2010

2020

GRAYLING CITY

1,944

2,259

315

16%

2,732

3,519

4,307

2,363

122%

GRAYLING TOWNSHIP

5,647

5,994

347

6%

6,515

7,382

8,250

2,603

46%

Community
.-:::-

Projections are straight line based on 1900 US Census data and 1994 Michigan Department of Managemenr and Budget estimates.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Three : Trends and Conditions

�4-1

Chapter Four
EXISTING LAND USE
INTRODUCTION
This chapter discusses land use in the City of Grayling and Grayling Township in 1996.
The information on the Existing Land Use Maps 4-1 and 4-2 was obtained from the City
of Grayling, the Northeast Michigan Council of Governments (based on 1978 MiRIS
data) and Grayling Township. The contents of these maps were verified by the City of
Grayling and Grayling Township.
Following are general land use attributes for these two communities:
• The City of Grayling is located at a major crossroads in northern Michigan. Grayling
is along Interstate 7 5 at the cross-state highway of M-72, which connects I-75 to
Traverse City to the west and Mio and Harrisville/Alpena to the east.
• While Grayling Township is large, the size of five townships or about 180 square
miles, most of the land is publicly owned, and generally unavailable for private
development.
• Public land holdings are largely undeveloped and provide vast natural resource
benefits to the area.
• Most of the people in the two communities live in or near the City of Grayling or in a
concentrated area near Lake Margarethe. The remaining area of Grayling Township is
sparsely settled, except along M-72 east of Grayling and along the AuSable River.
• Nearly all of the commercial and industrial activity is located in a concentrated area in
and around the City of Grayling. There are scattered industrial sites around the City of
Grayling and along Four Mile Road at the southern boundary of Grayling Township.
A portion of this industrial activity is across Four Mile Road in Beaver Creek
Township.
• The AuSable River flows through the City of Grayling and Grayling Township.
Segments of the River have resort housing lining the banks.
• The public lands in Grayling Township have a complex array of cover types. This is
due to differentiation of soils, topography and past human activity. Fire has been an
important factor. Some aggregations of cover type are possible. The primary cover
type is forest and includes both upland and lowland/wetland forests. There are large
areas of Pine, especially Jack Pine. Other aggregations include open land and
wetlands.
• Portions of the public lands are used by the military for training exercises. Due to the
danger involved in some of these exercises, such as artillery practice and tank

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�➔ -2

•

maneuvers, some areas are restricted to military access. Separate military maps are
available to delineate those areas.
While the public lands in State and Federal forest ownership are also used for
recreational purposes, improved recreational areas are located at various sites
throughout the City and Township. The largest of these is Hartwick Pines State Park.
In addition, an area of Military land (Hanson's Hills) is managed for recreational
purposes by the County Recreation Department. Private recreation lands also exist.

The land use/cover categories, mapped for Grayling Township and the City of Grayling,
are described below. Note that not all categories are common to both maps. There is no
low density residential land depicted on the City Existing Land Use Map (Map 4-1).
• Low Density Residential. This is residential housing on large lots, about one acre or
larger. Many are on five or ten acre or larger parcels. Some of these homes are located
on long drives, away from the road and others are built close to the road, as strip
residential.
• Medium Density Residential. This category includes homes on half to one acre lots.
Most of these are located close to the City or near Lake Margarethe.
• High Density Single Family Residential. These homes are built on platted lots, usually
on one quarter acre or less .
• Commercial. These are retail, service establishments, such as restaurants, motels, gas
stations and grocery stores.
• Office. This category includes such businesses as doctor's offices, insurance agents
and real estate offices.
• Industrial. This category includes businesses that manufacture or assemble goods or
process raw materials such as forest products.
• Recreation. Recreation uses includes golf courses, parks and ski hills.
• Public and Institutional. This category includes government offices, cemeteries,
hospitals and schools. Maps 4-3 and 4-4 show the location of public facilities.
• Wetlands. These lands have seasonably high water or standing water which generally
makes them unbuildable.
• Forest. These lands are covered by at least a 16% stand of trees.
• Open lands. These are undeveloped lands which have less than a 16% tree cover.

.-:- -

Natural Resources
In addition to the Existing Land Use/Cover Maps, there are two maps depicting natural
features. See Maps 4-5 and 4-6. These are important attributes that could provide
development limits or opportunities. Those features that are mapped include surface
water features such as lakes, rivers and wetlands and steep slopes. No other features were
;..,

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�4-3

found to be particularly limiting in the Grayling area. Steep slopes (over 25%) do not
occur frequently in the area. Lakes and rivers are prominent features which have already
served to attract development where private ownership permits. Wetlands occur over
broad areas of the Township and may serve to limit future development near the City.

station8:\winword\grayling\graych4.doc

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�4-4

Map 4-1
Existing Land Use Grayling Township

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�4-5

Map 4-2
Existing Land Use City of Grayling

ry
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�"' l ..,_

Map 4-3

GRAYLING TOWNSHIP
City of Grayling &amp;
Grayling Township
Master Plan Project

~

Public Lands (State and Federal)

C=:]

Privately Owned Land
City of Gray11ng Boundary

•

•

•

Grayling Township Boundary

Community Facilities
1. Township Hall
2. Crawford County Fairgrounds
&amp; Soccer Fields
3. Fish Hatchery
4. Hanson Hills Recreation Area
(

:!I
C:
,

;it

~

1 &lt;

:t:.

~

: ~
~

.&gt;....

}

5. Wakely Landing

�0

a:

&gt;&lt;

0

u

;:;

RED T~ll HAWK LOOP

:a:

:z

Map 4-4
CITY OF GRAYLING

~I!.\
\

City of Grayling &amp;
Grayling Township
Master Plan Project

I

t-' I
~.

Nortn1f

--~-j\

CI:

~
a:

\

w

;::.

a:

"-'
::::,

LEO DR .

Em

~

i

0

UJ

V,

D

161TH
8001,[J

:c
,-

ONLY

z

-

a:

-

-

Public Landi (ctty and County)
Ctty of QrayHng BOWldaty

0

ENTRANCE

Public and Institutional Facilities
1.

Cemetery

2.

City Well #1

3.

CityWell#2

4.

Elementary School

5.

Middle School

6.

City Hall

7.

Fire Department

8.

Water Tower

9.

City Garage

10.

Main Lift Station

11.

Sewer Lagoons

12.

County Building

13.

County Library

14.

County Garage

15.

United states Post Office

16.

Hospital

17.

City Park

..,

I..

I

®I

/'

/

ci':

I

,-

Vl

::::,

I

0

(
,~
....

~

::,

I

!::'

a:

@)

~

"" .

,,,_·, ---......
- . ~ •Sl,,r,:';1_,-:-,.
:-...

' . -~~-- f.

..

,,_j~

--------

~

.
CX:

I

er

~
-c

:It

er
-c

UJ
...J

u

�4-6

Map 4-3
Public Facilities Grayling Township

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�-1--7

Map 4-4
Public Facilities City of Grayling

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�-l-8

Map4-5
Natural Features Grayling Township

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�-l-9

Map 4-6
Natural Features City of Grayling

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Four: Existing Land Use/Cover

�5- 1

Chapter Five
SPECIAL ISSUE ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
The City of Grayling and Grayling Township face a number of issues unique to the
geographic region, the mix of land uses and ownership patterns, a mutual reliance
on regional resources and largely separately functioning governments.
This chapter discusses special issue areas by presenting information related to
those issues and options for dealing with them. These issues were identified based
on citizen input at the Futuring Town Meeting, via a survey of local leaders and
from brainstorming sessions with City and Township elected officials and
members of the Township Planning Commission.

PUBLIC LANDS
There are lands within the City and Township owned by all levels of government,
from local City and Township to County, State and Federal. See Map 5-1 for the
location of public lands within Grayling Township. Most of the land in the
Township is under State and Federal ownership. State ownership includes a State
Park, State Game Area, State Forest and State Military Board lands. Federal land is
held in National Forest.
Issues concerning State and Federal lands include:
• The large State and Federal land ownership compared to private ownership
which is seen as a potential limiting factor to private residential and economic
development.
• Large parcels of State owned lands are close to the City boundaries (although
little is adjacent to it), and this is viewed as a barrier to additional development
adjacent to the City.
• State-owned lands located adjacent to interstate interchanges, such as at Four
Mile Road and I-75, may have reduced usefulness for military or wildlife
preserve purposes due to the proximity to high-use highways or other industrial
and commercial land uses in close proximity.
• Undeveloped State-owned lands contribute to the rural character of the region.
• The rural character of most of the State owned land serves to attract both
tourists and people who want to build second or retirement homes in the north
woods.
• The Military Board lands serve the National Guard training activities of Camp
Grayling which helps drive the economy of the region and ensure military
readiness.
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Fi ve : Special Issue Analysis

�5-2

•

•

•

The policies by which the state or Military relinquishes public lands. On some
occasions sales have occurred when there can be a clear public purpose
described and the particular parcels have no special value as a public resource.
A more definite policy, based on planning that can be consistently applied is
desired.
A study for the private use of section 33, Township 26 North, Range 3 West,
was performed that examined the feasibility of obtaining for private, industrial
use, a section of State owned land on the north side of Four Mile Road.
Some of the State lands (Hanson's Game Preserve) were donated to the State-they were not tax reversions--and have restrictive clauses as to their use.

The following options are available to deal with public land issues:
• Consolidate public lands, in which ownership of some State lands are released
to the public and other private lands are obtained by the State. Generally, this is
done so that isolated parcels of State owned lands, which are more difficult to
manage are exchanged for privately owned parcels that are surrounded by State
lands. The effect, on a map, would be to straighten out the boundaries of State
holdings and filling in the holes.
• Transfer ownership of certain State holdings to private owners. This, by itself,
would result in the reduction of State owned lands within the Township and
would have to serve a broader public purpose, like new job development. State
land transfers should include, but not be limited to the following options, as
appropriate in a particular situation: ceding land from the State to a local
government, a 3-way trade and sale from the State to private interests at market
value.
• A combination approach in which some consolidation takes place and some
transfer of ownership occurs.
• Develop a strategy for use of military land at the airport for private job
generating uses.
The following strategies are recommended in dealing with public lands:
• Prepare and then pursue a proposal to the State, based on the goals and
objectives of this Plan, that identifies lands to be sold by the State, the eventual
uses of those lands (such as for new job development) and a schedule for sale
of the public lands. See Map 5-1 for the location of public lands recommended
for exchange.
• Coordinate the sale and development of those lands with incremental
infrastructure expansion.
• Develop a strategy for use of military land at the airport for private job
generating uses.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-3

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAYLING
AND FOUR MILE ROAD AT THE 1-75 INTERCHANGE
The two largest pockets of industrial development in the Grayling area are at M72, in the industrial park just east of I-75 and on both sides of Four Mile Road just
east of I-75. A portion of this latter area is in Grayling Township and the
remainder is in Beaver Creek Township on the south side of Four Mile Road. See
Maps 4-1 and 4-2 for the location of these industrial areas.
Issues concerning these industrial areas include:
• Grayling would benefit from an expansion of industrial development as part of
a stimulation of the economy and job market.
• There is limited land with adequate facilities available in or near the City for
new industrial development.
• The two most appropriate areas for expansion of industry are in these two areas
because of the close proximity to the interstate highway and rail service.
• City sewer and water are already provided to the industrial park within the City
boundaries.
• Most of the land between the two industrial areas is owned by the State.
• A steep slope is the one natural feature that makes development more difficult
in one portion of this area.
The following options are available to deal with industrial development in this
area:
• Develop an industrial corridor between M-72 and Four Mile Road and east of
I-75 (including section 33), either by a compact incremental expansion of the
lands from both ends toward the middle, or from the North to South, or initiate
construction of a new road paralleling I-75 first and, incremental utility
expansion later. The respective City and Township Zoning Ordinances would
need to be amended to reflect the future, industrial use of this area when
appropriate.
• Enter into an agreement with the State under which those lands between M-72
and Four Mile Road and east of I-75 would be sold for the purpose of an
incremental expansion of the industrial park.
• Redevelop other scattered industrial sites like the old Bear Archery facility.
• Expand industrial development on military land at the Airport.
The following strategies are recommended for improving industrial development:
• Pursue an agreement with the State which specifies the terms under which
those lands between M-72 and Four Mile Road and east of I-75 would be sold
for the purpose of an incremental expansion of the industrial park.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-4

•

•
•

Foster industrial growth in Grayling Township by expansion of the industrial
park along 1-75 from M-72 in the City of Grayling south to Four Mile Road
within the growth boundary (See Map 7-1 ). The growth boundary could extend
across Four Mile Road into Beaver Creek Township. Direct industrial
development to the area within the growth boundary shown on the Future Land
Use Map (see Map 7-1) This includes an area to have direct access to Four
Mile Road, including section 33. However, it does not permit development to
extend beyond the proposed growth boundary in the Four Mile Road corridor.
The industrial area within the growth boundary would have its own internal
circulation connecting businesses in the northern area of the industrial park to
the Four Mile Road interchange. Compact development within the area of the
growth boundary to the east of the interchange would result in cost effective
provision of public services and protection of rural character outside the growth
boundary.
Focus more energy on redevelopment of other scattered industrial sites like the
old Bear Archery facility.
Focus more energy on expanded industrial development on military land at the
Airport.

DEVELOPMENT ALONG FOUR MILE ROAD
Four Mile Road is an east-west road that serves as the southern boundary for most
of Grayling Township. There is an interstate highway interchange on Four Mile
Road at I-75. The western end of Four Mile Road connects with Military Road, a
north-south road that leads to Camp Grayling and M-72 to the north via a short
segment of M-93. The eastern end of Four Mile Road ends about seven miles east
of the interchange. The eastern edge of Grayling Township is about four miles
beyond.
Issues related to development along Four Mile Road include:
• Both commercial and industrial development that is emerging along Four Mile
Road benefit from access to the interstate highway via the interchange on Four
Mile Road.
• A considerable portion of the land on the Grayling Township side of Four Mile
Road is State land, while a greater portion of the land on the south, or Beaver
Creek Township, side of Four Mile Road is privately owned, limiting potential
development of prime development land in Grayling Township.
• Access for large trucks coming from the Mio area on M- 72, east of Grayling, to
Four Mile Road and the interstate interchange is difficult due to connecting
roads that are not built to a standard for truck traffic.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-5

•

•

Four Mile Road could serve as one segment of a truck bypass for downtown
Grayling if a North-South connecting route, east of Four Mile Road were
adequately improved
There is interest in obtaining State land for private development (example is
the study for the development of section 33, Township 26 North, Range 3
West) along Four Mile Road. However, this interest is piecemeal, and the State
does not want to encourage uncoordinated development by selling lands
without a coherent plan for the future.

The following options are available and recommended to deal with this issue:
• Improve one of the north-south roads connecting M-72 with Four Mile Road
(either South Barker Lake Road or South Staley Lake Road). This would
provide an improved connection to the interchange from areas to the east of
Grayling and keep significant truck traffic off City streets.
• Permit some enlargement of the highway oriented commercial node in the area
of the Four Mile Road interchange, especially in the area immediately to the
west of the interchange up to one mile from the interchange to the depth of the
current commercial area.

TRAIL CONNECTIONS
The abundant natural resources in the Grayling area are accessible, in part, by
hiking, cross-country ski, snowmobile, off-road vehicle and equestrian trails. See
Map 5-2 for the location of existing trails.
Issues concerning trails in the Grayling area include:
• Existing trails are an important tourist draw, and help contribute to the local
economy. They should be protected and enhanced.
• While the trails also provide recreational opportunities for Grayling area
residents, trail access requires cars to reach most trail heads. There are few
opportunities for Grayling residents to access trails directly from their homes.
• A large portion of State lands are used for military purposes, and some of those
areas are restricted. They would be unsafe areas for trail development. Some
trails do pass through unrestricted military lands.
• The close proximity of residential property to non-motorized trails has, in
experiences around the State, led to an increase in property values.
• Some citizens believe that trails adjacent to their property are a detriment.
The following options were considered regarding trails in the Grayling area:
• The continued use, maintenance and expansion of links to existing trails in the
Grayling area should continue to be supported by the City of Grayling and
Grayling Township.
City of Grayling/Grayl ing Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-6

•

•

•

Organizations that foster trail use and trail building would be invited to discuss
trail needs and options for meeting those needs with the citizens of the City of
Grayling and Grayling Township.
New opportunities for trails and trail extensions on public lands could be
explored with the Military Board, the Department of Natural Resources and the
United States Forest Service as a part of the Northern Michigan Ecosystem
Management Program.
Property developers could be encouraged through the site plan review process
to develop trail connections or to reserve space for future open space trail
connections to other developments and existing or future trails.

The following strategies are recommended for the improvement of trails as a
tourist and quality of life asset of the Grayling area.
• Support the continued use, maintenance and expansion of links to existing
trails in the Grayling area.
• Invite organizations that foster trail use and trail building to discuss trail needs
and options for meeting those needs with the citizens of the City of Grayling
and Grayling Township.
• Explore new opportunities for trails and trail extensions on public lands with
the Military Board, the Department of Natural Resources and the United States
Forest Service as a part of the Northern Michigan Ecosystem Management
Program.
• Encourage property developers through design guidelines and the site plan
review process to develop trail connections or to reserve space for future open
space trail connections to other developments and existing or future trails.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The City of Grayling and Grayling Township have a mix of housing stock.
However, most are modest in value (over half the owner occupied houses in the
City were valued below $50,000 in 1990 according to the US Census). Due to
relatively modest incomes of the work force, compared to Michigan and the rest of
Crawford County, there needs to be an ample supply of affordable housing-especially if industrial expansion policies result in a substantial increase of new
jobs.
Issues related to affordable housing include:
• There is a great need for affordable housing in the Grayling area.
• Many houses are in need of repair, both within the City and in the Township.
• The City already has built housing using federal monies for families requiring
subsidized housing. These are managed by the City's Housing Commission.
• There is a need for housing close to employment opportunities.
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-7

•
•

The publicly owned housing is fairly close to the industrial park.
Housing construction costs make the building of new affordable housing
difficult.

The following options are recommended to deal with this issue:
• Promote fix-up programs to rehabilitate substandard housing as an alternative
to new construction.
• Enlist the aid of organizations such as Habitat for Humanity to renovate
existing homes or to build new, infill housing.
• Provide incentives to developers to build affordable housing like increasing
permitted housing density in areas where services are adequate.
• Prohibit the construction of low density housing within the growth boundaries
so that lower cost, higher density housing can be built within or close to the
City, saving land infrastructure and service costs.

APPEARANCE
The appearance of houses, businesses, public parks, streets and institutions has an
effect on both the business climate and the quality of life of residents. Appearance
is a factor of design quality of signs, buildings and landscaping; maintenance and
repairs of buildings, signs, streets and sidewalks; the balance of man made and
natural materials and cleanliness.
Issues related to appearance include:
• The Grayling area is uniquely beautiful in its natural setting of woods, rivers
and lakes.
• The City of Grayling and portions of the Township have historic buildings
dating to the early logging and farming activities which provide important
variety to the architecture of the community.
• The design of signs, buildings and landscaping are often in contrast to the
natural setting of the community, and are no more unique in Grayling than in
most other Michigan communities. Grayling is becoming indistinguishable
from other places. The appearance of building and developed areas in Grayling
and Grayling township contrasts with the natural setting in the choice of
materials, the style of architecture and signs and in the large amount of hard
surfaces in and around developed areas. Often these contrasts are not attractive.
• An indistinguishable community loses its attraction as a destination and then
needs to rely on pass-through business for survival.
• The condition of many houses in the City and Township is deteriorated, adding
to a blighted appearance.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-8

The following options are available to deal with appearance issues:
• Use design guidelines to illustrate how development and redevelopment can
retain natural elements in the landscape.
• Use design guidelines and education programs to illustrate good visual design
principles.
• Encourage good design in new development and redevelopment.
• Stricter enforcement of codes and blight ordinances.
The following strategies are recommended to deal with issues related to
appearance:
• Develop illustrated design guidelines to show property owners how to develop
and maintain their properties in ways that contribute to an attractive and unique
Grayling community. These guidelines would pertain to residences, businesses,
industries and institutions. The guidelines should be in the form of suggestions,
and would not have regulatory powers.
• Enforce existing appearance and trash codes.
• Develop incentive programs for property improvement, such as beautification
awards.
• Host workshops and conferences that present approaches for the community
and individuals to protect and enhance community appearance (also called
community character).

OLD BEAR ARCHERY
For decades Gray ling was synonymous with Bear Archery Company and Fred
Bear. Some years ago the company moved south and the plant remained empty.
The building is located on M-72, just west of the intersection with the Business
Loop (James Street). It is within the City boundaries.
Issues related to the Bear Archery Building and property are as follows:
• The site, which is large and highly visible, is underutilized.
• A small manufacturing company has moved into the back half of the building
but the front half is underutilized.
• Environmental clean-up requirements for industrial uses are minimal. They
may also be minimal for commercial uses as well. There are more pros than
cons to future use of the site.
• The site, zoned commercial in the front and industrial in the back, is located in
the middle of a commercial strip.
• The site has prime commercial location. There are other industrial sites
available. However, the back half may be suitable for continued industrial use.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-9

The following options are recommended for use in dealing with the old Bear
Archery facility.
• Rezone the property for commercial use.
• Permit industrial uses on the site as a nonconforming use until vacated if
rezoned commercial.
• Assist property owners with environmental cleanup.

MILITARY AIRPORT
Adjacent to the north west boundary of the City of Grayling is the Grayling
MacNamara Airport. The airport is occasionally used by the National Guard for its
training and transport activities.
Issues related to the military airport are as follows:
• The airport contains underutilized land close to City services, a potential labor
force, and nearby interstate highway interchanges.
• The policies by which the Military permits use of public lands for private
purposes. Leases have occurred when there can be a clear public purpose
described.
The following options are available for use in dealing with the military airport:
• Seek an agreement with the State Military Board and the Federal government
to use part of the military airport for private economic development.
• Use portions of the airport, such as aircraft maintenance hangars, for private
industrial use.
Recommended strategies for dealing with this issue include:
• Expanding private use of the facility, especially for industrial uses that need
airport access.
• Promote industrial development of portions of the airport property.

DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT
Downtown commercial activity occurs primarily along two crossing streets,
Michigan Avenue and I-75 Business Loop (James Street). The old downtown of
Grayling is primarily on the two blocks of Michigan A venue on either side of
James Street.
Issues related to the development of the downtown are as follows:
• Exterior facades on many buildings are in a deteriorated condition.
• Architectural integrity of many buildings to their period of construction is not
consistent.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-10

•
•

Many of the businesses on Michigan Avenue are not directly adjacent to the 175 Business Loop, and consequently are not as visible to drive-through traffic.
Business success in this location might be helped if more people lived close to
the downtown.

The following options are available to deal with this issue:
• Conduct a facade improvement study, which should provide a range of design
suggestions for increasing business visibility, improving the attractiveness and
architectural integrity of downtown businesses.
• Change the Zoning Ordinance to permit residences above commercial
buildings as a way to enhance their long term viability and increase the market
for goods &amp; services.
Recommended strategies for dealing with this issue include:
• Improving exterior facades--retum to historic architecture where pertinent
• Encouraging commercial use of buildings not office or unrelated uses
• Encouraging, where feasible, upper floor residential use if adequate parking is
available.

UPDATE ZONING MAPS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH PLAN
Both the City of Grayling and Grayling Township have zoning maps. The primary
issue related to Zoning Maps and the Master Plan is:
• reflect all of the land use designations illustrated in the Future Land Use Map.
The options and recommended strategies available to deal with this issue include:
• Prohibit the expansion of commercial zoning districts. The areas now zoned
commercial are adequate to meet the commercial needs of residents and
travelers to the Grayling area for the next 20 to 25 years if the projected
population and employment became a reality. Premature expansion of
commercial land use could lead to the decline of existing commercial areas and
negative impacts on nearby residential or natural areas.
• Permit only higher density single family and multi-family residential within the
growth boundary. Low density single family residential housing within the
growth boundary consumes large amounts of land that is expensive to service,
does not support the extension of public services and limits affordable housing
opportunities.
• Permit only medium and low density single family residential uses on private
lands outside the growth boundary.
• Maintain an effective green buffer of public lands and undeveloped or sparsely
developed private lands between compact development surrounding the City
and the area of the Township beyond a green buffer.
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�5-11

•

Rezone land consistent with the Plan for more intensive use, only when the
public services and facilities necessary to service the development are
adequate.

station8 :\ winword\gray ling\gra ych5 .doc

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�1
5-12

Map5-1
Public Lands in Grayling Township

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�Map 5-1

GRAYLING TOWNSHIP
City of Grayling &amp;
Grayling Township
Master Plan Project
North

1r

B

Public Lands State and Federal)

c=J

Privately Owned Land

-

City of Grayling Boundary

•

•

•

Grayllng Township Boundary

1R

POTENTIAL LAND EXCHANGES

~

STATE LANDS PROPOSED FOR
EVENTUAL TRANSFER FOR
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT

�--

Map 5-2

GRAYLING TOWNSHIP
City of Grayling &amp;
Grayling Township
Master Plan Project
North

if

l.mffl
c=J

'.~ ..~ :........~i ~i~
,

:za.

.: /:

--. -,~::.__;.

Privately Owned Land
City of Grayling Boundary

•

•

Grayling Township Boundary

•

l
i
;

.

.

.. .

•::
,,

Public Lands (State and Federal)

1£

Z:411~~~'%!f' K TR .

Grayling Township Trails
• • •

•

Michigan Trail Riders
Association
Horse and Hiking Trails

■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • Snowmobile Trails

u.

u

�5-13

Map 5-2
Recreational Trails in Grayling Township

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Five: Special Issue Analysis

�6-1

Chapter Six
VISION STATEMENT, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION
This chapter contains a common vision statement for Grayling Township and the City of
Grayling plus goals and objectives to reach that vision. The vision statement describes a
future that residents of the community would like to achieve. A vision-based plan is
different from one that simply predicts trends and tries to accommodate them. A trendsbased plan may not reflect the kind of future residents really want. A vision-based plan
provides direction to the community as it makes both short-term and long-term decisions
about land use.

A Vision for Grayling's Future
Introduction
Achieving a common vision for the future of Grayling Township and the City of Grayling
is a critical part of development of a joint Master Plan. The following visioning statement
began with comments made by Grayling Township and City of Grayling residents at a
"Futuring" Town Meeting in May of 1996. Residents were asked to imagine themselves
in Grayling Township and the City of Grayling, 20-25 years into the future. Residents
were asked to describe what they "saw." These statements were recorded and compiled
into the following vision statement, which was reviewed and refined by the Township
Planning Commission, Township Board and City Council.
When reading this vision it is necessary to mentally "transport" yourself 20-25 years into
the future. The text is written presuming the year is 2020. This approach is intended to
give a clear sense of direction, focusing community efforts toward achieving the future
described in the vision.

Vision Statement
Grayling Township and the City of Grayling have moved into the 21st century as one of
the most desirable places to live within Northern Michigan. This has been achieved in
spite of the impacts of growth, which has concentrated new development in the relatively
small area of privately owned land within the two jurisdictions. Residents and businesses
in Grayling Township and the City of Grayling enjoy a rich quality of life and are reaping
the benefits of commitments made years ago. The rich visual splendor of the natural
environment, as well as social and economic characteristics of the community that
initially attracted residents have not only been maintained over time, but enhanced.
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6-2

Beginning in 1996, coordinated proactive initiatives were undertaken which went well
beyond common practice of the day in order to enhance the quality of life in the
Township and the City. The results of this hard work are obvious to visitors and residents
alike. The buzz word of planning in the 1990's was sustainability (meeting the needs of
the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs). Grayling Township and the City of Grayling have become a true
reflection of sustainability, as evidenced by the qualities and conditions described below:
The City of Grayling is known as a vibrant resort/commercial community of varied smallscale businesses, recreation services, small industries plus single family homes along treecovered streets. It has a charming, historic, small-town character in the midst of large
tracts of northern Michigan forest. Entry into the community at the interchanges on I-75
and from Highway M-72 presents an attractive welcome, due to unique signs that reflect
the historic flavor of the City and its compact settlement pattern set in the north woods.
Grayling Township has large tracts of publicly owned land which is mostly forested.
Quiet, tree-covered residential areas are tucked among the forests, next to Lake
Margrethe and along the AuSable River. Attractive, thriving resort, commercial and
industrial businesses are located adjacent to the City.
The Grayling area maintains both visual and economic links to its heritage as a lumbering
town and its present role as a destination recreation area. The visual character of the City
and adjacent commercial areas within the Township is uncluttered and adorned with
abundant natural features. Streets and public spaces are planted predominately with
naturally occurring species of vegetation rather than ornamental species. Signs are fairly
uniform in size, are made predominately of natural materials and are simple in design.
Utilities are buried underground. Streets are paved and well maintained. Street lights
adorn the City streets. The interchanges on 1-75 have been upgraded to standard all
direction designs.
Many businesses and public buildings reflect a period of the previous century, while more
contemporary buildings reflect the northern Michigan setting and blend or accentuate
nature. Buildings are attractive -- there are no eyesores. A considerable improvement in
the appearance of land, homes and businesses occurred at the end of the century as
neighbors helped neighbors clean up yards, paint old buildings and remove unneeded
junk and other materials.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6-3

Residents appreciate and are good stewards of the natural environment, protecting
wetlands and floodplains from encroachment and from siltation or dumping. Riparian
owners plant and maintain buffer vegetation that help maintain and improve water quality
by filtering runoff and cooling flowing water. Lake Margrethe, the AuSable River and
drains that flow into those water bodies are protected and flourish with natural vegetation
along the banks and clean flowing water. A wide range of species contribute to both plant
and animal diversity. Grayling Township and the City of Grayling are models of
residential, commercial and industrial resource protection and havens for wildlife. The
protection of natural features has resulted in an improved visual character of the
community.
The Township and City have thriving commercial, industrial and resort businesses that
provide employment to support most families in the community. The former Bear
Archery property has been redeveloped and the City's industrial park has been greatly
expanded to the south. The Grayling area has the lowest unemployment and poverty rate
in the State. More children stay in the area after high school graduation or return after
college. There is sufficient competition among local stores to keep prices at an affordable
level. Some State lands close to the City have been transferred to private ownership,
according to a plan that resulted in additional development, businesses and jobs, without
jeopardizing the stewardship interests in the State lands managed for the public benefit.
The military base remains a strong physical and economic presence in the community and
continues a tradition of mutually supportive activities with the City and Township.
Many different affordable housing opportunities exist within the community and people
do not have to commute long distances to work. Neighborhoods are very distinct and
have strong associations that work to improve neighborhood quality.
People in the City of Grayling and neighborhoods in surrounding Grayling Township
exhibit a friendly, cooperative attitude, volunteerism abounds and there is a commitment
to education and pride in their community. Students in Grayling receive a quality
education that matches state and national standards. As a result of that education, and the
emotional support and commitment of the community to everyone's self esteem, there is
little or no crime, drug use, divorce or teen pregnancy. Health care and services for
seniors is high quality. Pride in the community is shown through the constant upkeep of
residences and businesses by individuals and the proper maintenance and snowplowing of
roads by government road authorities. Residents are active in local government and are
willing to pay for improvements to services that are needed.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6-4

Important civic and recreational facilities, such as the High School, Mercy Hospital,
Hartwick Pines State Park, the AuSable River and City and Township parks are
connected to all the neighborhoods by bike paths. Targeted road improvements have
improved traffic flow, reduced accidents and reduced travel time.
Recreation is a major part of the Grayling area economy and quality of life. Trails for
cross-country skiing, snowmobiling, biking and hiking provide multi-season recreation.
Canoeing continues on a well-protected AuSable River. Fishing and hunting continues as
important activities and there are plenty of fish and game. More people also come to the
area for bird watching. An indoor sports complex with a swimming pool in the City
provides year around fun for local residents.

Goals and Objectives
Introduction
The following section lists goals and objectives for Grayling Township and the City of
Grayling to accomplish in order that the vision be achieved. Goals describe what the
community wants to achieve, and objectives are steps to reach those goals.
Goal One
The City of Grayling and Grayling Township are attractive, well planned
communities with a coherent visual character reflecting its location and purpose.
Objectives:
• Develop design guidelines to show property owners how to protect and enhance
buildings and grounds with improvements to signs, building facades, landscaping and
parking areas.
• Modify, adopt or support enforcement of ordinances that protect visual character, such
as blight, noxious weed and sign ordinances.
• Encourage compact residential and commercial development and re-development to
parcels close to existing development.
• Provide training for the Township Planning Commission, Township Board and City
Council in how to better enforce ordinances.
• Development of new and improved tourist destination attractions and supporting
services within the City and Township.
• Redevelopment and revitalization of the City commercial district.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6-5

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Capitalize on the Township's unique natural resources as a means to promote growth
and development in the area close to the City.
Create a network of trails and walkways to link downtown, the community, and the
AuSable River.
Emphasize the downtown's historic character and river orientation while reinforcing
its small town charm.
Create an environment which is oriented to both water-based and land-based visitors.
Establish the City as the major center for culture, entertainment and celebrations.
Plant more trees along City streets and along highway entryways.
Enforce existing appearance and trash codes.
Develop incentive programs for property improvement, such as beautification awards.
Host workshops and conferences that present approaches for the community and
individuals to protect and enhance community appearance (also called community
character).

Goal Two
The economic climate of the City of Grayling and Grayling Township supports full
employment and all persons living above the poverty level.
Objectives:
• Create new jobs through retention and expansion of existing employers and the
attraction of new companies.
• Target both the light industrial and recreation sectors of the economy for new job
creation.
• Continue development of the industrial park to accommodate new and expanding
business and manufacturing development.
• Expand the business and industrial development marketing program to support
business attraction and retention.
• Support reuse and redevelopment of older industrial sites throughout the City and
Township--especially the former Bear Archery property.
• Continue to upgrade and enhance the City's transportation and infrastructure system
to satisfy the needs of business, industry, tourists and residents.
• Coordinate activities between Grayling Township, the City of Grayling and Crawford
County as a means of supporting economic development initiatives area-wide and
promoting a positive and strong image for the Grayling area.
• Establish technical and educational support programs which match residents with
industry needs.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6-6

•
•

•
•

Develop a strategy for use of military land at the airport for private job generating
uses.
Pursue an agreement with the State which specifies the terms under which those State
lands between M-72 and Four Mile Road and east of I-75 would be sold for the
purpose of an incremental expansion of the industrial park and west and north of I-75
for future residential development.
Improve one of the north-south roads connecting M-72 with Four Mile oad (either
south Barker Lake Road or South Staley Lake Road).
Enlarge the highway oriented commercial node in the area of the Four Mile Road
interchange, especially in the area immediately to the west of the interchange up to
one mile from the interchange, to the depth of the current commercial area.

Goal Three
Grayling Township and the City of Grayling, together, are a recreation destination
and provide a wide range of recreation opportunities for local citizens and tourists.
Objectives:
• Enhance the natural beauty of the City by planting more vegetation, making its
physical assets both accessible and memorable to visitors.
• Coordinate local efforts with planners of State lands to enhance management for
recreation.
• Develop a Township Park with activities geared to families.
• Develop an indoor recreation facility for area residents that includes a swimming pool.
• Develop trail links between the City of Grayling and area facilities such as the High
School, Mercy Hospital, the AuSable River, Hartwick Pines State Park, a new
recreation facility and other recreation destinations.
• Promote the Grayling area as a place which is attractive to resorters, destination
vacationers and transient tourists alike.
• Strengthen the diversity of shopping and recreational opportunities available to all
visitors.
• Maintain a high level of hospitality and service for residents and tourists alike.
• Protect and improve public access to the lakefront and River.
• Coordinate implementation of the County-wide recreation plan.
• Coordinate with Camp Grayling the issue of access and improvements to the
Hanson's Hill ski area.
• Explore new opportunities for trails and trail extensions on public lands with the
Military Board, the Department of Natural Resources and the United States Forest
Service as a part of the Northern Michigan Ecosystem Management Program.
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision , Goals and Objectives

�6-7

•

Encourage property developers through design guidelines and the site plan review
process to develop trail connections or to reserve space for future open space trail
connections to other developments and existing or future trails.

Goal Four
The highways, streets and roads in the Grayling area provide adequatf!
transportation for the needs of local residents and businesses in all seasons.
Objectives:
• Develop a comprehensive transportation system which maximizes travel options,
including the automobile, bike paths, sidewalks and River paths within the City and to
key places in the Township.
• Improve traffic safety along the main routes through the City of Grayling.
• Improve the safety and efficiency of the City's street system.
• Ensure adequate public and private parking is available to meet resident and visitor
needs.
• Alleviate truck traffic on the business loop and traffic congestion problems within the
City during peak visitor travel periods.
• Maintain the long term function and capacity of the City's arterial highway system as
well as connecting roadways by working closely with MDOT, the County Road
Commission and adjacent jurisdictions.
• Improve interchanges along I-75 so they are all standard all direction designs, if
feasible.
• Improve one of the north-south roads connecting M-72 with Four Mile Road (either
south Barker Lake Road or South Staley Lake Road) and extend Industrial Drive
south to Four Mile Road.

Goal Five
The commercial areas of Grayling Township and the City of Grayling are
economically healthy, contribute to the visual character of the community, and
provide a wide range of goods and services at affordable prices.
Objectives:
• Maintain and improve the diversity of shopping opportunities.
• Develop design guidelines to help merchants enhance the visual character of their
businesses.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6-8

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

Create attractive, safe, convenient, and pleasurable pedestrian routes throughout the
City's commercial area.
Establish new residential development abutting the commercial areas of the City and
Township.
Encouraging, where feasible, upper floor residential use in the downtown if adequate
parking is available.
Identify and emphasize structures and places of historical and/or architectural
significance to support and reinforce the special identity and character of the
community.
Create a network of green spaces, providing a focus and variety of experiences while
enhancing comfort in the commercial areas.
Define, maintain and buffer the edges of commercial areas as related to surrounding
neighborhoods.
Conduct a facade improvement study, which should provide a range of design
suggestions for increasing business visibility, improving the attractiveness and
architectural integrity of downtown businesses.

Goal Six
Grayling area communities have first-rate health care and senior services plus
adequate sewer, electric and water service, police and fire protection and animal
control.
Objectives:
• Provide comprehensive and cost effective police protection, fire protection and
ambulance service.
• Provide support services in locations convenient to all neighborhoods and residents.
• Provide public/private self sufficiency programs for individuals with special needs.
• Cooperate with the County in the provision of certain community facilities and
programs, such as prisons and animal control.
• Preserve the City's and Township's ability to satisfy long term solid waste disposal
needs.
• Maintain the City's sewer and water system and its capacity to satisfy future long term
needs.
• Coordinate underground infrastructure construction with road construction.
• Bury all power, telephone and cable lines as the opportunity presents itself.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6-9

Goal Seven
The Grayling area has high-quality education for basic K-12 schooling, job training,
adult education, post-high-school education opportunities and cultural/historical
facilities.
Objectives:
• Develop and maintain high quality job training, continuing education and post-high
school programs.
• Promote parental involvement in school programs.
• Promote business mentor programs and involvement in the schools.
• Develop and maintain cultural/historical facilities in keeping with community support.

Goal Eight
The citizens of Grayling Township and the City of Grayling live in harmony with
the environment.
Objectives:
• Grayling Township develops and promotes a community recycling program in
conjunction with the City's existing program.
• City and Township offices develop programs to recycle and to buy recycled products.
• The Township develops a composting program in conjunction with the City program.
• The City and Township promote and enforce practices to protect drains, creeks, rivers
and lakes from chemical pollution, siltation and warming.

Goal Nine
Area natural resources, such as trees and water, are abundant and protected.
Objectives:
• Develop a vegetation management plan for the City of Grayling and residential areas
of the Township that provides direction for residents in developing and perpetuating a
tree canopy and other vegetation that contributes to a natural visual character.
• Acquire easements (where possible) for public open space to the banks of rivers and
lakes in developed areas and to wetlands, including buffers along edges of wetlands.
• Develop design guidelines for sensitive natural areas for use by private property
owners in managing their properties to protect natural resources.
• Develop pedestrian and bicycle links between residential neighborhoods and the
parks.
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6-10

Goal Ten
The City of Grayling and Grayling Township enjoy responsive, responsible
governments that are well coordinated and frequently interact with each other.
Objectives:
• Support uniform zoning, building and fire codes (as appropriate) and enforcement of
those codes in both the City and the Township.
• Adopt and administer compatible zoning along the City-Township border and
Township border with other townships.
• Evaluate and refine as needed, the City of Grayling and Grayling Township lot split
ordinances.
• Develop a region-wide transit system.
• Coordinate efforts to promote the Grayling area to the mutual benefit of all
jurisdictions.
• Develop a set of common policies and programs which address issues larger than
those of individual jurisdictions.
• Work cooperatively towards maximizing County and State investment within the
Area.
• Support joint recreational efforts in both the City and the Township, and the local
school system.
• Develop a regional community center with an emphasis on youth programs.

Goal Eleven
Volunteers in Grayling Township and the City of Grayling stimulate enthusiasm for
community interaction and help provide for those in need.
Objectives:
• Volunteer organizations in both Grayling and Grayling Township work cooperatively
to identify and prioritize needs and to implement projects to address those needs.
• Develop or enhance recognition programs for contribution of volunteers to the local
community.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�6- l l

Goal Twelve
Camp Grayling and the National Guard remain a substantial, positive part of the
life of Grayling Township and the City of Grayling.
Objective:
• The City and Township continue to work with the National Guard, Camp Grayling
administration to address issues of mutual concern in supportive ways.

Goal Thirteen:
Grayling Township and the City of Grayling have an adequate supply of quality,
affordable housing.
Objectives:
• Promote fix-up programs to rehabilitate substandard housing as an alternative to new
construction.
• Enlist the aid of organizations such as Habitat for Humanity to renovate existing
homes or to build new, infill housing.
• Provide incentives to developers to build affordable housing like increasing permitted
housing density in areas where services are adequate.
• Prohibit the construction of low density housing within the growth boundaries so that
lower cost, higher density housing can be built within or close to the City, saving land,
infrastructure and service costs.

stations :\winword\grayling\graych6 .doc

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Six: Vision, Goals and Objectives

�7-1

Chapter Seven
FUTURE LAND USE
INTRODUCTION
Desired future land use arrangements may be difficult to understand if a
community were to rely only on the vision statement, goals and objectives in
Chapter Six. A generalized description of future land use arrangements that
represents one consistent implementation of adopted goals, obj'ectives, and policies
is a valuable aid. It is easiest to understand if accompanied with a map. This
chapter presents Future Land Use Maps, policies and accompanying text to guide
future land use decisions in addition to the vision statement, goals, objectives of
Chapter Six.
The Future Land Use Maps accompanying the description of future land use in this
Chapter (see Map 7-1 and 7-2) seeks to anticipate community land use
arrangements for 20-25 years (with the exception of the large industrial area
between M-72 and Four Mile Road which is intended to met community needs for
a much longer period). The Future Land Use Maps have been formulated based on
information in the preceding chapters. The land use arrangements are based on
analysis of existing land use, impacts of area trends, projected future land use
needs if current trends continue, characteristics of vacant land, community needs
for a strong employment base and the land use pattern suggested by the vision
statement, goals and objectives.
A few key planning and design principles were used to evaluate land use
arrangements leading to this Plan. This Plan generally supports application of
those principles well into the future. Areas of residential, commercial and
industrial land within the growth boundary should be adequate to meet the needs
of the community for many decades. Even with slightly different trends and
projections, application of the same principles could lead to slightly different
conclusions. However, these differences would be related more to the timing of
particular land uses than their location or relative relationships to adjoining uses.
For example, if a large mixed use development (e.g. 100 single family dwelling
units plus some commercial) were built near the City or if a large single employer
would enter the scene (e.g. a forest resources-based facility) land use arrangements
in this Plan should be able to accommodate them. However, because of changing
conditions, it is crucial that this Plan be regularly reviewed and updated at least
once each five years to insure its continued relevance in guiding future land use
change.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven: Future Land Use

�7-2

PLANNING AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Future land use arrangements were determined based on compatibility with
surrounding land uses, natural capacity of the land for particular uses, availability
of necessary infrastructure and services and consistency with the vision statement,
goals and objectives.
The following planning and design principles are the technical foundation in
support of the proposed land use arrangements graphically depicted on Maps 7-1
and 7-2. The planning principles listed below are implemented primarily through
zoning regulations and applied during the site plan review process. These
principles are consistent with the vision statement, goals and objectives in Chapter
Six and should, along with the relevant land use policies in this and the next
chapter, be a key basis for reviewing any subsequent changes to the proposed
Future Land Use Maps. These planning principles are:
• Protection of Public Health and Safety
• Conservation of Sensitive Natural Resources
• Environmental Protection
• Minimizing Public Service Costs
• Efficiency and Convenience in Meeting Land Use Needs
• Insuring Compatibility Between Land Uses (Nuisance Prevention)
• Sustaining a Job Base Adequate to Support Families.
Often a land use decision based on one principle also advances another. For
example, prevention of filling or construction on floodplains protects public health
and safety, conserves natural resources, protects the environment, and minimizes
public service costs (especially for relief efforts). It may also create a valuable
buffer or open space between uses and hence helps insure compatibility.

Protection of Public Health and Safety
Key situations in which this principle is applied include:
• A voiding construction or altering construction in areas which present natural
hazards. In the Grayling area the primary natural risk is from forest fire and
homes built among Jack Pine should have adequate access for emergency
response vehicles. There are also areas of wetlands (soils not well suited for
support of foundations) and soils with a high potential for groundwater
contamination.
• A voiding construction in areas with soils contaminated by hazardous and/or
toxic waste until after they have been safely cleaned up and certified for reuse.
• A void construction in flood prone areas

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven : Future Land Use

�7-3

•

A voiding strip development with too many driveways close together in order to
prevent congestion and traffic accidents.

Conservation of Sensitive Natural Resources
Failure to consciously protect sensitive natural resources exposes a community to
the risk of destruction of those resources which are often the foundation for an
area's character and quality of life. Sensitive natural resources include wetlands,
natural rivers, areas supporting an abundance and diversity of wildlife, and unique
wooded lands. Poorly planned development in or near these areas can not only
destroy the resource and the natural character of the area, but can also result in
higher public service costs and gradual degradation of an area's tourism potential.
Environmental Protection
This principle aims at preventing pollution, impairment, or destruction of the
environment. While there is considerable overlap with natural resource
conservation issues, environmental protection measures focus primarily on air and
water quality, and the impact of activities where the water meets the land.
Environmental quality is best preserved by planning for appropriate land use
activities in and near the waterfront and preventing contamination of air, soil and
water. This usually means conducting environmental impact assessments before
undertaking certain projects and insuring conformance with all applicable Federal,
State and local environmental regulations as new development or redevelopment
occurs.
Minimizing Public Service Costs
Public service costs may be minimized by encouraging new land uses where
existing infrastructure is not used to capacity and where expansion can be most
economically supplied. This also results in compact settlement patterns, prevents
sprawl, and is usually favored by taxpayers because it results in the lowest public
service costs both for construction and maintenance.
Efficiency and Convenience in Meeting Land Use Needs
To be efficient in meeting future land use needs, existing infrastructure must be
optimally used and infrastructure expansion must occur in a manner which keeps
the costs low. It also means locating future land uses so that travel between activity
centers is minimized, for example, building schools, neighborhood commercial
development, and day care facilities, ne,ar the residential areas they serve. This
saves municipal costs on initial facility and road construction as well as on future
maintenance. Because trips are shorter, it reduces everyone's gasoline
expenditures, and conserves fossil fuel supplies for future use. It also reduces
travel times and if auto, pedestrian and bicycle travel are planned for, it increases
modal opportunities.
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven: Future Land Use

�7-4

Insuring Compatibility Between Land Uses
A central objective of land use planning is to locate future land uses so that they
are compatible with one another. This prevents future nuisance situations between
adjacent land uses, such as loud sounds, ground vibrations, dust, bright lights,
restricted air flow, shadows, odors, traffic, and similar impacts. A few obvious
examples of incompatible land uses include factories, drive-in establishments, or
auto repair facilities adjacent to single family homes. With proper planning, land
uses can be tiered to buffer impacts and orderly development can occur. Examples
include: commercial service establishments on highway frontage with backlot
wholesale, storage, or office uses abutting a residential area; or single family
residential uses adjacent to park and recreation areas.
Sustaining a Job Base Adequate to Support Families
A community that has a safe, quality environment, efficient services, and has
compatible land uses may not remain a good place to live without a job base that
offers sufficient wages to support families. While not all jobs that support families
living in Grayling need to be located within Grayling because of excellent
transportation facilities connecting to other job markets, without an enlarging job
base in the City, growing public service costs must be spread across homeowners
in greater proportions in the future.
Applying Planning Principles
Community Character
When applying the above planning principles to new development proposals, one
of the key considerations is compatibility with the character of existing
development in an area. In describing the character of Grayling, many descriptive
words and phrases come to mind, among them: quiet, friendly, clean, small town,
bountiful natural assets of water and woods, and good location. Chapter Two
documents the existing community character of Grayling.
Development
Almost all of the land in private ownership in the City of Grayling is developed.
The City should use zoning and public improvements to continue to insure that
these lands are neither over-developed nor under-developed, and that new
development is compatible with adjacent, existing development. The Township
and the City should work together to insure that higher density development occurs
within the growth boundary and only limited, low density development occurs
outside the growth boundary.
As new development occurs on vacant land and on land abutting City limits,
special efforts should be taken to place each project in the context of the whole
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven: Future Land Use

�7-5

community and not view it as an isolated element. Each new development should
blend with the natural and built environment around it, be linked to it in safe and
convenient ways and contribute to the unique small town character of Grayling and
the rural character of Grayling Township that is widely recognized and enjoyed by
so many.

Tourism
A sustained tourist-oriented business sector is something that many Grayling
business owners want to continue. Yet the increased activity and congestion that .
go with successful tourism are characteristics which may negatively impact on
abutting neighborhoods. New tourist related downtown development and
associated infrastructure improvements need to be planned so as to support the
improved quality of (rather than diminish the quality of) abutting neighborhoods.
Blending the Resort Areas with the Year-Round Community
There will probably always be a division within the community between resort and
seasonal areas and year-round areas. Recognizing the importance of each and fair
representation of both in community decision making will be an ongoing challenge
in making future land use and infrastructure decisions. Achieving and maintaining
a balance will be the key to long term success. The existing commercial and
residential areas are generally well separated and the demarcation lines are fairly
clear. It will be important that they remain essentially where they are as far as new
commercial activity, or the necessary balance may be lost.
Year-Round Employment/Industrial Development
Historically, Grayling has had a mixed source of employment: seasonal service
related to tourism, manufacturing and government. Recent developments have
helped produce a more balanced, year-round mix of employment opportunities.
Winter tourism activities are steadily drawing more people through northern
Michigan towns such as Grayling. New industries in Beaver Creek Township to
the south of Grayling are a sign of interest in locating in the Grayling area. The
hospital has become a major employer in Grayling. New industrial development is
both needed and desirable. There are appropriate locations available, and the City
should continue its efforts to market this space, add to it as needed, and insure that
improvements in quality of life are maintained and improved to help attract good
employers.

FUTURE LAND USE
The mapping of future land use is a pictorial extension of the vision statement,
goals and objectives stated in this Plan. Land use is the primary purpose for which
a parcel of land is occupied. This Plan is designed to promote orderly development
and ensure that appropriate areas are available for all classes of land uses
City of Grayling/Grayling Townsh ip Master Plan
Chapter Seven : Future Land Use

�7-6

anticipated to be needed within the planning area during the planning period
(roughly 20-25 years) based on existing trends and a community vision for the
future. This Comprehensive Plan promotes orderly development in a number of
other ways. Home owners can invest in their properties with protection from the
intrusion and impact of incompatible uses in the neighborhood. Overcrowding can
be avoided. The City and utility companies can adequately plan for the services
needed in (re)developing areas and ensure that adequate land has been anticipated
for all necessary uses.
The land use/cover categories, mapped for Grayling Township and the City of
Grayling on Maps 7-1 and 7-2, are described as follows:
• Low Density Residential. This is residential housing on large lots, about one
acre or larger. Many are on five to ten acre or larger parcels. Some of these
homes are located on long drives, away from the road and others are built close
to the road, as strip residential. Additional, low density residential development
is planned only in Grayling Township, and is not planned for any land within
the Growth Boundary.
• Medium Density Residential. This category includes homes on half to one acre
lots. Most of these are located close to the city or near Lake Margarethe or
along the river.
• High Density Single Family Residential. These homes are built on city lots,
usually on one quarter acre or less.
• Commercial. These are retail and service establishments, such as restaurants,
motels, gas stations and grocery stores.
• Office. This category includes such businesses as doctor's offices, insurance
agents and real estate offices.
• Industrial. This category includes businesses that manufacture or assemble
goods or process raw materials such as forest products.
• Recreation. Recreation uses includes golf courses, parks and ski hills.
• Public and Institutional. This category includes government offices, cemeteries,
hospitals and schools.
• Wetlands. These lands have seasonably high water or standing water which
generally makes them unbuildable.
• Forest. These lands are covered by at least a 16% stand of trees.
• Open lands. These are undeveloped lands which have less than a 16% tree
cover.
Note: Not all of these categories are represented on both the City and Township
Existing Land Use/Cover Maps.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven: Future Land Use

�7-7

LAND USE POLICIES

POLICIES
Policies are statements to guide the C1ty Council, Township Board, Township
Planning Commission, other boards, authorities and departments in making
decisions and developing programs to serve citizens. Following are land use
policies developed based on the vision statement, goals and objectives to guide
future land use decisions in the City of Grayling and Grayling Township. The
policies are organized by general category.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
These areas include wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes (generally along the
AuSable) and special wildlife habitats. It is the p~licy of the City of Grayling and
Grayling Township to:
• Preserve environmentally sensitive areas and use them for passive recreation,
open space, flood storage and hunting (where compatible with adjacent land
uses).
·• Avoid construction on environmentally sensitive lands. Developers shall build
on uplands where construction will not damage steep slopes and nearby
wetlands or floodplains.
• Permit only very low density residential development on large lots on privately
owned areas of environmentally sensitive lands.
High Fire Risk Areas
Large portions of Grayling Township contain pine forests in which the
predominant species is Jack Pine. These areas are at high risk for fires and for fires
that spread rapidly. See Map 2-1. Homes built in those areas are especially at risk
from fire and historically, have often been built with limited accessibility for
emergency vehicles. It is the policy of Grayling Township to:
• Permit only very low density residential development in High Fire Risk Areas
on large wide lots (10 acre minimum)
• Encourage State land managers to only permit passive recreation and hunting
rather than activities that could promote fires in these areas
• Promote only those road improvements that can help ensure safe emergency
access to remote properties
• Clear Jack Pine and large canopy trees away from residences in fire-prone
areas.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven: Future Land Use

�7-8

Waterfront Areas
There are two common types of waterfront properties in the Grayling area. These
are lakefront, on Lake Margarethe and riverfront, along the AuSable River.
Development that places large areas of impervious surfaces adjacent to water
bodies tends to contribute to the degradation of water quality through increases in
sediments, oils, chemicals and temperature both during and following completion
of construction. It is the policy of Grayling and Grayling Township to:
• Permit the division of land for residential development only into low density,
wide lots, along waterfront in the Township and on smaller lots in the City
• Permit construction only above the floodplain
• Encourage property owners to plant greenbelts along the shoreline of both
lakefront and riverfront properties
• Ensure that land di visions for residential areas allow enough lot area for safe
septic systems with adequate distance between septic systems and water wells.
Other Residential Areas
There are a variety of different residential neighborhoods in the Grayling area.
Some of these are older neighborhoods within the City while others include
subdivisions just outside the City and strips of houses along the rural roads. It is
the policy of Grayling and Grayling Township to:
• Encourage the highest density residential development within or close to the
City on public sewer and water wherever possible
• Limit lot size based on the septic suitability of soils, in areas that will not be on
public sewer and water, increasing minimum lot size where necessary to
prevent groundwater contamination
• A void strip development in which houses line rural roads, decreasing traffic
safety and decreasing rural character
• Encourage residential development in planned subdivisions where houses can
be placed for an efficient use of the land and public infrastructure
• Encourage the design of residential subdivisions with pedestrian and bicycle
links to commercial, recreation and institutional uses
• Encourage the rehabilitation or redevelopment of substandard housing.
Commercial Areas
Gas stations, convenience stores, restaurants, specialty shops and motels line
several of the streets in the City of Grayling and Grayling Township. In the
Township, such commercial areas are located primarily adjacent to the City.
Commercial businesses are an important part of the lifeblood of the community.
The Grayling area has enough commercially zoned land to meet citizen needs for
several decades. It is important to maintain a critical mass of commercial

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven : Future Land Use

�7-9

enterprises in the existing commercial areas in order to ensure their long term
viability. It is the policy of Grayling and Grayling Township to:.
• Prevent new commercial development outside of planned areas
• A void new strip commercial development that would serve to destroy the rural
character of the community
• Encourage more intensive redevelopment of existing commercial areas.
• Permit the expansion of the commercial node at the I-75 and Four Mile Road
interchange to expand up to one mile west of the interchange to a depth of the
current commercial development.
Industrial Areas
Manufacturing, assembly and warehousing businesses are an important and,
hopefully, growing part of the Grayling economy. Industrial uses are (in 1997)
somewhat scattered into several industrial areas. There is existing space available
in industrial parks. A few old industrial sites and the military airport are
underutilized. Yet space for future job growth is inadequate. It is the policy of
Grayling and Grayling Township to:
• Encourage more industrial development on the military airport property
• Expand industrial use contiguous to existing industrial areas
• Plan incremental expansion of the industrial area between M-72 and Four Mile
Road as South Barker Lake Road or South Staley Lake Road is extended and
public sewer and water services are available
• Reserve space for expansion of the sewage lagoons to accommodate new
development.
Park &amp; Recreation
Grayling is in the middle of one of the State's prime recreation areas. However,
much of that recreation land is primarily available for hunting, fishing and
canoeing, and to improve the quality of life for residents, there also needs to be
playgrounds for children, ball fields and places for families to walk and ride their
bikes close to their homes. Some of these needs are met by the public schools, the
City of Grayling and the County Recreation Authority. It is the policy of Grayling
and Grayling Township to:
• Provide for parks and recreation space as new residential development occurs,
both as part of the design of new subdivisions and as separate public parks
• Link residential development to commercial, recreation and institutional uses
with a network of trails and bike paths.
Institutional Areas
Schools, government offices and other services such as hospitals help citizens to
meet personal needs, to function as a society and to have a good quality of life. It
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven: Future Land Use

�7-10

is important that these institutions be located where they are readily available to
the people they serve. It is the policy of Grayling and Grayling Township to:
• Encourage all new schools to be built within or immediately adjacent to the
City or an existing school facility
• Encourage new medical and related services to locate adjacent or near to the
existing hospital as provided in the Zoning Ordinance
• Encourage all other new public and related institutional buildings to be erected
within or immediately adjacent to the City unless a service response time (like
a forest fire station) requires another location.
Public Lands
Grayling Township has more of the land within its borders owned by the public
than by private land owners. This serves to provide a beneficial resource to a wide
variety of individuals and businesses. It also limits the choices for locating new
development. State and federal land policies make it possible for public lands to be
sold to individuals and businesses, although in a limited amount and only for a
purpose that serves the public good. One such public good would be to make land
available for industrial expansion if the new industrial development does not harm
existing business nor community and natural resources, and is phased coincident to
the provision of adequate roads, sewer, water and related public services. It is the
policy of Grayling and Grayling Township to:
• Develop an official agreement with the appropriate State and federal agencies
for sale of certain State lands for private development consistent with the land
use, infrastructure and staging policies in this Plan.
Community Character
One aspect of the quality of life of a community is its visual character. A
community that is an attractive place to live is better able to compete for business
development, since those businesses will have an easier time attracting good
workers and customers. It is the policy of Grayling and Grayling Township to:
• Encourage annual clean-up/fix-up programs
• Encourage preservation of the historic character of older structures
• Preserve views to natural areas from public streets and other public property
• Maintain natural vegetation along rivers/streams and lakes
• Plant more trees in the City and along public roads
• Encourage landscaping of parking lots and areas along public roads
• Encourage parking on side and back of new buildings, not in front
• Maintain existing parallel access roads along the I-75 South business loop and
add along M-72 as the opportunity presents itself
• Encourage improvement of the visual appearance of "out of character"
buildings in downtown Grayling
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chaµter Seven : Future Land Use

�7- 11

•
•
•

Initiate more beautification efforts in downtown Grayling and along other
commercial strips
Improve the image of the community as is presented at entry ways
Preserve natural features and sensitive lands as new development occurs.

station8 :\ winword\gray Ii ng\graych 7 .doc

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven: Future Land Use

�7- 12

Map 7-1
Grayling Township Future Land Use

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven: Future Land Use

�7-13

Map 7-2
City of Grayling Future Land Use

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Seven : Future Land Use

�8-1

Chapter Eight
PUBLIC SERVICES &amp; INTERGOVERNlVIENTAL
COORDINATION PLAN
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Future Land Use Plan discussed in Chapter Seven describes the desired
pattern of land development throughout the City and Township through the
establishment of land uses and densities for areas with common characteristics.
The Public Services Plan described in this Chapter identifies the manner and
degree to which public infrastructure and services are to be provided within the
City and Township areas adjacent to the City to support the planned future land
use pattern. Public services and related infrastructure include sewage disposal and
potable water, streets and roads, police and fire protection, recreation, and general
government services.
Because the character and feasibility of land development is directly affected by
the extent to which public services are available, the Public Services Plan works
hand-in-hand with the Future Land Use Plan and is a critical element of the City of
Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan.

OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC SERVICES
Policy Basis
The Public Services Plan is based on the principle of new development occurring
concurrent with or after the public services necessary to serve it are in place. It is
the specific intent of the Public Services Plan to minimize opportunities for the
leapfrogging of more intensive development into the areas of Grayling Township
that lack adequate infrastructure or are unsuitable to accommodate intensive
development.
The Public Services Plan consists of two policy strategies. The first identifies, by
geographic areas, the relative level of new or expanded services. To this end, the
Public Services Plan is based upon both the current and future planned land use pattern
in the City and adjoining lands in Grayling Township. The expansion or introduction
of increased public services is given greatest priority in those areas of the Township
where the existing or intended future land uses are to be of such types, intensities or
densities that the availability of adequate public services is crucial. The extension of
public services will be limited to those areas delineated by the growth boundary on the
Future Land Use Map. The City and Township will each base its future capital
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�8-2

improvement projects, and the expenditure of funds for such projects, upon this
policy.
The second level of policy strategy addresses future decisions regarding
improvements to the City's and Township's respective delivery of individual
public services in response to existing conditions and anticipated needs.
Collectively, these two policy strategies formulate the manner by which, and
conditions upon which, future improvements should be made regarding public
services. It is the policy of this Plan that all major public facility improvements be
included in the capital improvement program (CIP) of the City or Township (or
both if relevant).
The Public Services Strategy calls for a future public services pattern quite
different than the current pattern that is primarily within the City limits. Planned
expansion of City services into discrete portions of Grayling Township is
anticipated. The new areas served will be considered "partial urban service" areas
until annexed to the City or until a full complement of urban services are made
available by a P.A. 425 or other agreement.

FULL AND PARTIAL URBAN PUBLIC SERVICES PROVISION
The Future Land Use Maps (Map 7-1 and 7-2) depict the urban services area as
ultimately expanded, by the year 2020 or beyond. It is also known as the growth
boundary. This service district prescribes the extension of sewer and water to serve
additional industrial and residential development.

Urban Services
A full complement of urban services are available to almost all developed
properties within the City limits as of 1996. These urban services include paved
roads, sidewalks, public water and sewer, electricity, gas, police, ambulance and
fire protection.
Partial Urban Services
Partial urban services are available to those areas of Grayling Township which, in
comparison to areas receiving full urban services, are generally characterized by
lower development densities, less existing public infrastructure, lower public
service levels, and the planned potential for a higher development density pattern
on some currently undeveloped or underdeveloped lands. The future land use
pattern within the area receiving partial urban services necessitates the need for a
higher level of public services than exists in 1996 due to more businesses and
homes and projected higher traffic volumes. In particular, lands receiving partial
urban services are not capable of accommodating extensive commercial or
industrial land uses, or significant high density residential development without
City of Grayling/Grayling Townshi p Master Plan
Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�8-3

public sewer and water, improved roads, and better police, fire and ambulance
service.
This Plan recognizes that lands receiving partial urban services today may
ultimately become part of the area receiving full urban service within the growth
boundary. Incremental expansion of urban services as the need, opportunity and
resources exists will be the principal vehicle for expansion of services outside the
City limits.
INDIVIDUAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMPONENTS
Streets and Related Transportation
As new residential, commercial, and industrial land uses are introduced into the
City and Grayling Township, the need for a roadway network able to
accommodate the increased traffic demand increases. Ultimately, improvements
will be needed or the risk of congestion, vehicular and pedestrian hazards, longer
travel time, higher auto "wear and tear," and a general decrease in the quality of
road service will occur.

Conversely, it must be recognized that an improved roadway network may well
attract new or expanded intensive land uses which, in tum, place additional
demand on the transportation network. Such change must be managed so that the
rate of land use change does not overtax the ability of the City, Grayling
Township, and Crawford County to make the necessary improvements.
There is no recent comprehensive traffic count and accident data available with
which to propose widespread street improvements. This is a need which the City
and Township should address, in partnership with the County Road Commission.
There are three major identified needs for improvements that can be recommended
as part of this Plan. The first is to improve the interstate highway interchanges
within the City. The second is to widen M-72 from the downtown westward to M93 in the Township. Eventually, it is hoped, M-72 will be improved between
Grayling and Traverse City, providing sufficient lanes for passing throughout the
whole stretch. The third improvement is a truck by-pass from M-72 east of
Grayling to Four Mile Road. This could be accomplished by improving either
South Barker Lake Road or South Staley Lake Road or by extending Industrial
Drive through the industrial park to Four Mile Road.
Interstate Interchanges
There are four interchanges on I-75 serving the Grayling area. These are at:
City of Grayling/Grayling Townsh ip Master Plan
Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�8-4

•
•
•
•

Four Mile Road (southernmost boundary of Grayling Township and northern
boundary of Beaver Creek Township)
I-75 Business Loop (South end of City)
North Down River Road
Hartwick Pines Road (northernmost interchange).

The two interchanges within or adjacent to the City limits are not complete
interchanges. The North Down River Road interchange only provides a
southbound exit and a northbound entry. The I-75 Business Loop interchange only
provides a northbound exit and a southbound entry. Persons stopping in Gray ling
while traveling through to another destination have no "easy-off. easy-on
interchange near the City. This is believed to deter some travelers from stopping. It
was a source of concern in every group at the Futuring Town Meeting. There
should be a four-way interchange at North Down River Road.
Both City interchanges should be rebuilt to provide full access in all directions. In
order to make best use of limited resources, these improvements should be made
following the priority of improving the North Down River Road interchange first.
The City and Township should also take whatever steps are necessary to retain
railroad service and air service to the City, and where feasible, to expand the range
of services available from these facilities.
In addition, M-72 and the I-75 Business Loop through the City should be improved
at the three-corner intersection of both roads and as the Business Loop (James
Street) crosses the bridge over the AuSable. These safety improvements will also
lessen congestion and help with traffic flow.
In making these and related transportation improvements, the City, Township,
County and State will respond to the greatest needs as financial resources become
available, based upon the following:
• The degree to which the improvement is needed to protect public health and
safety or preserve or achieve full use of existing facilities.
• The degree to which a project represents a logical extension of existing streets
or roads within an area of the City according to its intended land use and
services level.
Sewer and Water
The City of Grayling provides sewer and water service to an area roughly within
the City boundaries. Public sewer and water service have the effect of promoting
new industrial or residential development. Sewer and water extensions can be paid
City of Grayling/Grayling Townshi p Master Plan
C hapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relati ons Plan

�8-5

for by either the community as a whole or wholly or in part by the developers of
property that would benefit from a sewer or water extension.
The City of Grayling consumes about 843,000 gallons of water per day. The
municipal system has a capacity of about 1,500,000 gallons per day. The municipal
sewer system has a capacity of 550,000 gallons per day and is currently processing
about 400,000 gallons per day.
The provision of public sewer and water facilities should occur in conformance
with the Future Land Use Plan and in the interest of the community's health,
safety, and public welfare.
Since much of the undeveloped land abutting the City is characterized by soils
which, with some exceptions, permit septic systems on larger lots, the goal of
permitting more intensive development of these lands will require public sewer
and water.
It is the policy of the City of Grayling and Grayling Township to:
• Extend City sewer and water with the cost paid by the serviced property as the
need exists and consistent with adopted City service policies
• Identify areas for sewage lagoon expansion and new public water well
construction and reserve land as the opportunity presents itself and revenues
are available to pay for these new facilities
• Establish and maintain a public sewer and water service boundary and then
extend the boundary only as new development occurs consistent with the
policies for the location and timing of new development.
• Approve land development projects involving single family homes in the
Township at no more than three dwelling units per acre in any zone allowing
residences, and to not allow nonresidential development larger than 50
employees within the growth boundary unless connected to public sewer and
water service.
• Not extend City sewer and water outside the boundaries of the outer growth
boundary, and inside only in a phased manner consistent with other pertinent
policies in this Plan.

'\

It is the policy of the Township of Grayling that areas outside the service boundary
of City sewer and water be developed using on-site wells and septic systems or
community well or packaged treatment systems approved according to standards
of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and the County Health
Department.

City of Grayling/Grayling Townsh ip Master Plan
Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�8-6

Stormwater Management
As the land surface is covered by buildings, parking lots and other impermeable
surfaces, the quantity of stormwater runoff increases. The soils and vegetated
landscape which previously absorbed and slowed much of the water associated
with storms are gone. Unless specific preventive measures are taken, these
conditions encourage increases in runoff flow, soil erosion, sedimentation and
pollution of area water resources, as well as some flood potential. Though these
conditions originate from site-specific circumstances, their cumulative impact can
extend to the entire community and communities beyond if within the same
watershed. Inadequate management of stormwater produced due to land
development and urbanization threatens public health, safety, and welfare through
life threatening flood conditions, contamination of groundwater resources,
deterioration of water-based recreation facilities, and damage and loss of property
values. In contrast, stormwater management aims to minimize flood conditions,
and ensure the quality of runoff which is collected and ultimately discharged into
the watershed system (streams, rivers, wetlands, lakes, etc.) is adequate.
S tormwater management has not been an acute concern to the Gray ling area due to
the highly permeable, sandy soils, large areas of wetlands capable of holding large
quantities of stormwater, and the relatively low intensity of development. Largescale development which is characteristic of some industries and commercial
centers can create localized stormwater problems.
It is the policy of the City of Grayling and Grayling Township that the following
guidelines will be used in adequately controlling the quality and quantity of
stormwater runoff associated with the introduction of new land uses:
• Proposed land uses will not be permitted if and where the level of service
currently provided by existing stormwater management infrastructure and/or
existing drainage patterns would be decreased, unless necessary improvements
to such infrastructure or natural drainage are first made.
• The current level of service may vary from one site to another but will be
generally defined as the rate, quantity, and quality of pre-development
stormwater runoff.
• All new and existing land uses must comply with all City, Township, County,
State, and Federal regulations regarding stormwater management and soil
erosion.
• All proposed and existing land uses located on sites with slopes of 12% or
greater shall take and maintain aggressive measures to inhibit the erosion of
soils and sedimentation.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�8-7

Support Services and Buildings
Support services, as referred to within this Plan, includes all the public services a
community may provide to its residents above and beyond sewer. water, roads and
streets. In particular, these services include police, ambulance and fire protection
and general government services such as tax assessment, cemetery care, code
administration and governance services. The reference to these services as support
services is not intended to suggest that they are of secondary importance but
simply that they are of a different type than that of sewer, water, and street
services.
As community growth and land development increases, so does the need to extend
police, ambulance and fire protection to more individuals, families, and properties.
Similarly, as the demand for these services increase, so does the need for services
administration and the need for property and buildings from which these services
are administered.
The Plan is intended to assure that fire, police protection, ambulance, and
associated land and buildings, are available to provide for both the existing and
future welfare of residents and property within the City of Grayling and Grayling
Township.
The following policies will assist the City in its pursuit of maintaining, and as
necessary, improving the level of service for police, fire and emergency services:
• The City will continue to provide fire service in conjunction with Grayling
Township (and mutual aid agreements with other municipalities as needed) for
fire service equal to the quality of service (fire rating of seven) in place at
adoption of this Plan. There is no immediate goal of increasing the fire rating
due to the need to convert from a volunteer to a paid staff.
• The City will maintain police protection and emergency services at a level
adequate to meet or exceed basic health and safety needs and expand the
services as revenues permit.
• The City will maintain property and buildings in locations necessary to provide
appropriate response to calls for police, fire and emergency services.
The Township of Grayling will pursue a policy of inter-local agreement in the
provision of support services and buildings whenever it is mutually beneficial to
do so.
Recreation Strategy
The Recreation component of the Public Services Plan is fulfilled by the separate
1996 Park and Recreation Plan, developed by Crawford County, which is hereby
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�8-8

incorporated by reference as an official part of this Master Plan. See Map 8-1 for
the location of recreation sites within the Township.

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
In contrast to decades past when movement between communities was several
days travel by stagecoach and the activities of one community had little impact
upon the quality of life of other communities, we now Ii ve in an environment of
microcomputers, vehicular and mass transit, telecommunications, and urban
sprawl. People often live in one community, work in a second, shop in a third, and
send children to school in still a fourth. And it all happens in the same day!
Roadway corridors, employment centers, and retail trade centers link the activities
of one community to the next and beyond. Similarly, the growth and development
patterns of an individual community can easily and directly impact growth and
development in adjoining and nearby communities.
As a result of this regional pattern of living, a community does not exist unto itself
but is intrinsically linked with the activities of adjacent communities and others
farther away. This dictates the need for communities to cooperate and coordinate
community planning and public service endeavors if improvements to quality of
life are to be realized. Cooperation by adjacent local governments can result in the
better provision of services such as health care, schools, infrastructure and public
safety. Not cooperating can lead to the expensive duplication of services,
competition for residents and businesses and a diminished quality of life. The
Intergovernmental Coordination component of the Master Plan establishes the
framework within which the City Grayling and Grayling Township will realize the
benefits of coordination with each other and with area municipalities and agencies.
It is the policy of the City of Grayling and Grayling Township for each to more
effectively carry out its municipal and township activities and responsibilities
within the regional context by implementing the following:
• The City of Grayling and Grayling Township will develop common procedures
whereby both communities and Crawford County are provided the opportunity
to comment on amendments to the City's and the Township's Comprehensive
Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, capital improvements plan,
and related ordinances and programs of the City and Township any time
amendments may have impacts on public services or land use decisions of the
other jurisdiction.
• The City of Grayling will provide the opportunity for comment by adjoining
jurisdictions on any development project within 500 feet of the edge of the City
and will formally request Grayling Township to permit notice to the City and a
City of Grayling/Grayling Townshi p Master Plan
Chapter Eight : Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�8-9

•

•

comment opportunity on any development project within 500 feet of the
Township border with the City.
The City of Grayling will pursue the coordination and/or extension of public
services to serve City residents and businesses, as well as abutting Grayling
Township areas in the most practical and economically feasible fashion, if the
demand exists, and in accord with the policies previously set forth in this Plan.
The City of Grayling and Grayling Township agree to develop a procedure to
deal with issues of greater than individual local concern, and to prepare
consistent development guidelines and similar zoning procedures and standards
wherever there is mutual benefit in doing so.

station8 :\ winword\gray ling\gra ych8 .doc

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�Map 8-1

GRAYLING TOWNSHIP
City of Grayling &amp;
Grayling Township
Master Plan Project
North

'1f

GtZfil
C=:J

Public Lands (State and Federa l)

Privately Owned Land
City of Grayling Boundary

•

•

• Grayling Township Boundary

RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
1. Lake Margarethe Forest Campground
&amp; McIntyre Land ing
2. Main Street Beach Public Access Site
3. Hanson Hills Recreation Area
4. Grayling Country Club
5. Public High School
6. Hartwick Pines State Park
7. State Forest Campground -· Au Sr1ble River
Canoe Forest
8. State Forest Campground -- Burton ' s Landin £
9. State Forest Campground -- Keystone Fores t
10. Stephen Bridge Road Public Fishing Site -Public Access Site
11. Kneff Lake National Forest Campground
12. Wakely Landing
13. Huron National Forest -- Public Access Site
14, State Fish Hatchery
15

_ Township Park •. Little League Ball Fields

16 _ County Fairgrounds -- Ball Fields
17 _ Grayling Elementary School
18 _ Grayling Middle School
19. Grayling City Park

-

�8-10

Map 8-1
Recreational Facilities in Grayling Township

•

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Eight: Public Services &amp; Intergovernmental Relations Plan

�9-1

Chapter Nine
IMPLEMENTATION
PRIMARY IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
Relationship to Zoning
The City of Grayling has a zoning ordinance adopted pursuant to the City-Village
Zoning Act, PA 207 of 1921. Grayling Township has a zoning ordinance adopted
pursuant to the Township Rural Zoning Act, PA 184 of 1943. The intent of these
ordinances is to regulate the use of land to provide for orderly growth and
development and allow the integration of land uses without creating nuisances. A
zoning ordinance defines land use districts and regulates height, bulk, use, area of
lot to be covered, and open space to be preserved within each district. Zoning is
the principal regulatory tool used to implement a Master Plan.
Because zoning is required to be based upon a Plan that serves to guide future land
use decisions, the zoning ordinances of the City of Grayling and Grayling
Township should be revised to reflect this Plan's new vision, goals, objectives,
policies, and future land use proposals. However, the Zoning District Map of each
jurisdiction and the Future Land Use Map (see Maps 7-1 and 7-2) for the
respective community will not be identical. The Zoning Map reflects existing land
use (where it is desirable to continue it) and areas zoned for more intensive use
than at present where public facilities are adequate to accommodate more intensive
use. In contrast, the Future Land Use Map reflects land use arrangements about 2025 years in the future. (See Section 10.10, p. 245-250, Michigan Zoning &amp;
Planning, 3rd Ed., by attorney Clan Crawford, ICLE, Ann Arbor, 1988).
Areas outside the City limits of Grayling are subject to zoning by Grayling
Township. It is a goal of this Plan that cooperative agreements will continue to be
formulated between the City of Grayling and Grayling Township that anticipate
expanded City infrastructure and future land use consistent with this Plan. In
addition, Beaver Creek Township will need to be considered and included where
appropriate. To that end, each of these jurisdictions, and all others abutting
Grayling Township are encouraged to review their existing future land use plans
contiguous to the City, and where inconsistent, to consider changes. Similarly,
existing zoning in Grayling Township should be reviewed to ensure current zoning
is not prematurely encouraging intensive use in areas that lack adequate public
facilities. In particular, the density of residential development east of Grayling is
generally too high in light of the fire prone nature of extensive Jack Pine in the
area, the poor quality roads and limited fire services. Consideration should also be
City of G rayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Nine : Implementation

�9-2

given to adoption of identical zoning regulations by the City of Grayling and
Grayling Township for areas that could be annexed in the future. This will prevent
the creation of any nonconforming uses and establish a uniform mechanism for
review of land use changes in these areas. An identical PUD zone could be
developed for this purpose as has occurred in Frankenmuth and Frankenmuth
Township.
Relationship to Subdivision and Condominium Regulations
The City of Grayling should update existing subdivision regulations following (or
concurrent with) zoning changes to implement recommendations in this Plan. The
enabling legislation that permits the enactment of such regulations is Public Act
288 of 1967, also known as the Subdivision Control Act of 1967. This Act allows
a community to set requirements and design standards for streets, blocks, lots,
curbs, sidewalks, open spaces, easements, public utilities, and other associated
subdivision improvements. This update should wait the outcome of deliberations
on amendments to the Subdivision Control Act in the 1996/1997 Legislative
sessions. Condominium regulations should also be enacted pursuant to the
Condominium Act, P.A. 59 of 1978 in order to regulate site condominiums, an
increasingly common form of development.
Grayling Township is encouraged to update existing subdivision and condominium
regulations as the opportunity exists. This will be especially important if the
Legislature enacts substantial changes to the Subdivision Control Act as were
pending in fall 1996 (see SB 112). Grayling Township has no subdivision or
condominium regulations and is encouraged to adopt such regulations prior to
extension of City sewer or water into the Township. Such regulations are critical to
ensuring quality layout of new roads and streets and proper connection with
municipal facilities.

Relationship to Capital Improvements
In its basic form, a capital improvement program (CIP) is a complete list of all
proposed public improvements planned for a six year period including costs,
sources of funding, location, and priority. The CIP outlines the projects that will
replace or improve existing facilities, or that will be necessary to serve current and
projected land use development within a community.
Advanced planning for public works through the use of a CIP assures more
effective and economical capital expenditures, as well as the provision of public
works in a timely manner. The use of capital improvements programming can be
an effective tool for implementing the Master Plan by giving priority to those
projects which have been identified in the Plan as being most important to the
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Nine: Implementation

�9-3

future development and well being of the community. All proposed capital
improvements should be reviewed for consistency with this Plan prior to inclusion
as part of a CIP. The Planning Commission of the Township should develop a
formal capital improvement program for approval by the Township Board as part
of the annual budgeting process. The City Council should continue to develop and
annually implement a capital improvement program.

Land Use &amp; Infrastructure Policies
A strong effort will be necessary to coordinate future capital improvement
decisions and land use policies among adjoining units of government. As a result,
proposed policy changes should be circulated for comment early. Likewise,
proposed capital improvement programs should be prepared with adequate time
for review and comment by the adjoining jurisdictions.
Housing Program
Depending on State and Federal requirements and available dollars, the City and
Township may benefit from developing and implementing a housing rehabilitation
program. The benefits of such activity may significantly increase as existing
housing ages. However, more important in the long term may well be continued
efforts to ensure the existing housing stock is maintained.

~

Building and Property Maintenance Codes
BOCA (Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc.) is the
basic building code adopted by the City and Township to regulate construction
methods and materials. The adoption and enforcement of a building code is
important in maintaining safe, high quality housing and in minimizing
deteriorating housing conditions.
The City and Township should continue utilization of the BOCA Basic Housing Property Maintenance Code as a basic property maintenance code to regulate
deteriorating influences which result from failure to properly maintain property
and structures. The Housing Code should be updated and coordinated with a
Rental Code. The City and Township should consider adoption of ordinances to
decriminalize zoning, building, housing, rental and similar code violations to
increase compliance using a parking ticket like approach.

11

PUBLIC WORKS FINANCING
In addition to using general fund monies, it is often necessary for a community to
bond to raise sufficient funds for implementing substantial public improvements.
Bonding offers a method of financing for improvements such as water and sewer
lines, street construction, sidewalks, and public parking facilities. Common
municipal bond types include:
City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Nine: Implementation

�9--1-

1. General Obligation Bonds - full faith and credit pledges. the principal
amount borrowed plus interest must be repaid from general tax revenues.
2. Revenue Bonds - require that the principal amount borrowed plus interest
be repaid through revenues produced from the public works project the
bonds were used to finance (often a water or sewer system).
3. Special Assessment Bonds - require that the principal amount borrowed
plus interest be repaid through special assessments on the property owners
in a special assessment district for whatever public purpose the property
owners have agreed (by petition or voting) to be assessed.
These traditional financing tools will continue to carry the burden for
implementing capital improvements and efforts to preserve City and Township
bonding capacity should be maintained.

ADDITIONAL IMPLEMENTATION METHODS
Other Planning &amp; Economic Development Assistance
The Township Planning Commission and the City Council should maintain regular
communication with the County and Regional Planning Commissions on issues of
mutual interest. These organizations should be encouraged to expand their County
and region-wide planning and economic development efforts and to share relevant
materials with the City and Township. Likewise a copy of this Plan should be
forwarded to these agencies when adopted or amended.
Managing Growth and Change
The key to successfully managing future growth and community change is
integrating planning into day-to-day decision making and establishing a continuing
planning process. The only way to get out of a reactionary mode ( or crisis decision
making) is by planning and insuring the tools available to meet a broad range of
issues are current and at hand. For that reason it will be especially important that
the recommendations of this Plan be implemented as the opportunity presents itself
(or revised as circumstances dictate).
Many new tools may be made available to local governments over the next few
years to manage the growth and change process (if pending legislation is enacted).
It will be important for City and Township officials to pick from among the new
tools, those that will provide greater choice over local destiny and quality of life.

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Nine: Implementation

�9-5

•

Periodic Updating and Revisions
As additional studies are undertaken and land use change occurs, the Master Plan
should be updated to reflect the new information. At a minimum the Plan should
be comprehensively reviewed and updated at least once every five years.

Revision of Ordinances
The City of Grayling's and Grayling Township's respective Zoning Ordinar ces
should be reviewed and updated to be consistent with this Plan. If this is not done
then the legal support for future zoning decisions is undermined. Each Zoning
Ordinance should also be thoroughly reviewed and updated at least once each five
years. All future rezoning actions should be consistent with this Plan. If they
aren't, this Plan should be amended to reflect the policy change.
station8:\winword\grayling\graych9.doc

•

•

City of Grayling/Grayling Township Master Plan
Chapter Nine: Implementation

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008507">
                <text>Grayling-and-Grayling-Twp_Master-Plan_1997</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008508">
                <text>City of Grayling City Council, Grayling, Crawford County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008509">
                <text>Grayling Township Planning Commission, Grayling Township, Crawford County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008510">
                <text>1997</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008511">
                <text>City of Grayling and Grayling Township Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008512">
                <text>The City of Grayling and Grayling Township Master Plan was prepared by the City of Grayling City Council and the Grayling Township Planning Commission with the assistance of the Grayling Township Board of Trustees and the Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. in 1997.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008513">
                <text>Grayling Township Board of Trustees (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008514">
                <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008515">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008516">
                <text>Grayling (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008517">
                <text>Grayling Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008518">
                <text>Crawford County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008519">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008521">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008522">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008523">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008524">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038339">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54743" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59014">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/2bbd00820f2d8a1a7bc811ac9ebaa9bf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b2f88b8af80d29af696f4e3ca73bf05b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008971">
                    <text>-

CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICJIIGAN

MASTER PLAN

�II
II
Ill

CITY OF LAKE ANGELUS
Oakland County, Michigan
MASTER PLAN

Ill

•
•
•
•
•
•II
•II
•
•
•

City Council
Donald P. Althoff, Mayor
C. Dale DeLorge, Mayor Pro Tern
Rosalie Lake
George A. Drake, III
William T. Collins, Jr.

Planning Commission
George A. Frisch, Chairman
Donald P. Althoff
Dorothy Arcari
William T. Collins, Jr.
Edward Dauw
Dale DeLorge
Lee Embrey
Peggy Kresge
Forrest Milzow

City Attorney
James L. Howlett

Adoption
Planning Commission._ _ _ __

Building Official
Bill Dinnan

George A. Frisch, Chairman

Consultants
Carlisle Associates, Inc .
111 N. Main
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Nancy De Lorge, City Clerk

�II
II

!T

JI

able of Contents

INIRODUCTION

II
II

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I

What is Planning ................. .... .......... .. ........ .. ............ .. .. ....................

1

How Is The Plan to be Used..............................................................

1

Who is Responsible...........................................................................

2

How Were Citizens Involved............................................................

3

BACKGROUND STUDIES
Historic Content................................................................................

4

Regional Setting................................................................................

5

Surrounding Influences .....................................................................

6

Population ......... ...... .... .. .. ...... ...... ...... .... .. .. ........................................

8

Housing.............................................................................................

9

City Facilities....................................................................................

10

Natural Resources.............................................................................

10

Transportation ... ................ ...... ........ ........ ............ .......... .. ...... .... ........

14

Economic Base..................................................................................

15

Existing Land Use.............................................................................

15

GOALS AND POLICIES
Introduction.......................................................................................

16

General Planning Goals .. .. .. .. .. .... .. ...... .... .. .... .... .. .. .. .. .. ........ .. .. .. .. ......

16

Policies ...... .. .......... .. ...... .. .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ...... .. ...... .... ...... .. .. ..........

16

�II

•

•
•
•
•
•II
•II

I
I
I

PLANNING STRATEGIES
Introduction.......................................................................................

20

Land Use Plan ......... .. .......... ........ .. .......... .... ...... ................ .. .. .. .... .. .. ..

20

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
City Governmental Policies ........ ...... .... ........................ .... ................

28

Intergovernmental Cooperation .......................... .................. ............

28

Master Plan Education .. .. .... ............ .. ........ ............ .. .............. ............

28

Plan Updates ......... ........ ...... ........ .... .... .. .......... .......... ........ .... .. .. ...... ..

28

Implementation Tools.......................................................................

28

Conservation Greenbelts...................................................................

29

Water Quality....................................................................................

29

Natural Beauty Roads .......................................................................

30

City Recreation Space.......................................................................

30

Future Planning Commission Tasks.................................................

31

�II
II
I

II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

INTRODUCTION

�I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

ntroduction
be made with the general purpose of
guiding and accomplishing a
coordinated, adjusted,
and
harmonious development of the
municipality and its environs which
will, in accordance with present and
future needs, best prorrwte the health,
safety, morals, order, convenience,
prosperity, and general welfare, as
well as efficiency and economy in
the process of development;
including, among other things,
adequate provision for traffic, the
promotion of safety from fire and
other dangers, adequate provision
for light and air, the prorrwtion of the
healthful and convenient distribution
of population, the promotion of good
civic design and arrangement, wise
and efficient expenditure of public
funds, and the adequate provision of
public utilities and other public
requirements.

What is Planning?
Planning is a process which involves the
conscious selection of policy choices
relating to land use, growth and
development in the community. The
Master Plan is the only official City
document which sets forth policies for
the future of the community. Therefore,
the plan serves as the primary guide to
the City regarding future land use
decisions, investment in public
improvements, and coordination of
public improvements and private
development.
In one sense, the Plan presents an
idealized view of future growth patterns
in the City. However, the Plan must also
provide guidance to local decisionmakers regarding today's issues. It is the
intent of this Plan to be a working
document which will provide for the
orderly development of the City, assist
the community in its effort to maintain
and enhance a pleasant living
environment, and spark a vision toward
the future.

How Is The Plan to be Used?
The Plan serves many functions and is to
be used in a variety of ways:

The City derives its authority for the
preparation of a Master Plan from the
Municipal Planning Act, P.A. 285 of
1931. Sections 6 and 7 of the Act states:

The commission shall make and
adopt a master plan for the physical
development of the municipality,
including any areas outside of its
boundaries which ... bear relation to
the planning of the municipality.
In preparation of such plan the
commission shall make careful and
comprehensive surveys and studies
of present conditions and future
growth of the municipality and with
due regard to its relation to the
neighboring territory. The plan shall

City of l.Ake Angelus

Page 1

1)

The Plan is a general statement
of the City's goals and policies
and provides a single,
comprehensive view of the
community's desire for the
future.

2)

The Plan serves as an aid in
daily decision-making. The
goals and policies outlined in
the Plan guide the Planning
Commission and City Council
in their deliberations on zoning,
subdivision,
capital
improvements and other matters
relating to
land use and

Master Plan

�The policy orientation of this
Plan provides decision-makers
with a framework and basis for
decisions while recognizing the
dynamic character of the
community. The variables
upon which this Plan is based
will likely change over time.
However, adherence to the
goals and policies will provide a
stable, long-term basis for
decision-making.

I

I

I
I
I
I
I

goals and policies aimed at the unified
and coordinated development of the
City. As such, it provides the basis
upon which zoning and land use
decisions are made.

development. This provides a
stable, long-term basis for
decision-making.

3)

Who is Responsible?
The City of Lake Angelus has a
number of bodies that are actively
involved in the planning and zoning
decision-making process:

A third function the plan serves
is to provide the statutory basis
upon which zoning decisions
are based. The City or Village
Zoning Act (P.A. 207 of 1921,
as amended) requires that the
zoning ordinance be based upon
a plan designed to promote the
public health, safety and general
welfare.
However, it is
important to note that the Master
Plan and accompanying maps
do not replace other Municipal
Ordinances, specifically the
Zoning Ordinance and Map.
Zoning is only one of the many
legal devices used to implement
the Master Plan.

4)

The Plan attempts to coordinate
public improvements and
private developments.

5)

Finally, the plan serves as an
educational tool and gives
citizens, property owners,
developers and adjacent
communities a clear indication
of the Municipality's direction
for the future.

In summation, the City of Lake

Angelus Master Plan is the only
officially adopted document which
provides direction for the
achievement of goals and policies. It
is a long range statement of general

City of Lake Angelus

Page2

•

City Council - The City Council
is the chief governing body of the
City. By Michigan statute, the
City Council approves rezoning
requests,
zoning
text
amendments, and subdivision
plats. By City Ordinance, the
City Council approves site plans,
special land uses, subdivision
plats, lot splits and floodplain and
wetland permits.
The City
Council also sits as the Board of
Zoning Appeals.

•

Planning Commission - Planning
Commission members are
appointed by the Mayor and
approved by City Council. The
Planning Commission is
responsible for formulating and
adopting the Master Plan and is
the principal recommending body
to the City Council on matters
pertaining to the planning and
development of the community.
The Planning Commission makes
recommendations to the City
Council on rezoning requests,
zoning text amendments, site
plans, special land uses, lot
splits, floodplain and wetland
permits and subdivision plats.

•

Board of Appeals - The Board of
Appeals serves to interpret
provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance when requested and
determine when variances should
be granted when peculiar

Master Plan

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

difficulties with property make it
impossible to meet the strict
provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance. As indicated, the City
Council sits as the Board of
Appeals.
How Were Citizens Involved?
In the course of preparing the Master
Plan, the Planning Commission actively
sought the input of the citizens of Lake
Angelus. A community survey was sent
to every household resulting in a return
rate of over 80%.
Two public workshops were held to
report the progress of the Master Plan
and seek the input of citizens on issues of
concern.

I

I

City of Lake Angelus

Page3

Master Plan

�II

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

BACKGROUND STUDIES

�I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II

II

'

•

B

ackground Studies
ensure its protection.
However,
transportation to the surrounding areas
had facilitated growth in Pontiac and
Waterford Townships, as well. Early in
its history, the lake was in jeopardy of
being annexed by neighboring
governmental units.

In order to develop a comprehensive
Master Plan, an inventory of cultural and
natural resources must be made. This
essentially builds the "backbone" for
decision-making within the City and
establishes an accurate projection of
what to expect in the future.

The most significant event in the history
and future of Lake Angelus occurred in
1929. A special Act of the State
Legislature authorized "homerule" for
Lake Angelus. A Charter Commission
was formed. On May 10, 1930, the
Village Charter was accepted by the
residents by a vote of 52-0. Lake
Angelus was incorporated as a Village
on May 17, 1930.

Historic Content

Lake Angelus has a unique
environmental and human history. It is
not by accident that the lake and the land
immediately surrounding it exists today
as the City of Lake Angelus. Men and
women who came to Three Mile Lake
shortly after the tum of the century and
citizens who have come since seeking
the tranquillity of a natural environment
have had the foresight and determination
to preserve what they found.

Many years of devoted public service,
thoughtful reflection, and careful future
planning continued the effort to preserve
the character and natural beauty that the
early citizens had perpetuated with
"homerule". Fifty four years later, in
1984, by a vote of 149-4, the residents of
Lake Angelus changed the form of
government from a Village to a City
strengthening their ability to act
cooperatively in the wider community
while maintaining their historic values.

After the first survey of the area in 1817,
lands within the present City were taken
by patent from the United States in the
1830's. The area remained agricultural
until the end of the century, protected
from development by a lack of easy
access from centers of population. The
early 1900's brought fishermen from
Detroit for summer weekends, the
division and sale of large parcels of land,
and the growth of a small community of
people whose business lives were often
related to the automobile which brought
them to Lake Angelus.
By the 1920's, residents had agreed on
restrictions to govern themselves and the
use of lands and waters of Lake Angelus.
Subsequently, they would move
Gallogly Road from the shoreline to its
pres~nt course to prevent public access,
acqmre Welcome Island for all to enjoy,
and purchase lands to circle the lake to

City of Lake Angelus

Page4

Master Plan

�Regional Setting

Lake Angelus is located approximately thirty (30) miles north of Detroit in the heart of
Oakland County. It is located north of the City of Pontiac and east of Waterford
Township. With Interstate 75 only minutes to the north, residents of the City enjoy
excellent access to the remainder of Oakland County and the balance of the Detroit and
Flint metropolitan areas.

-II

OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN

_,_,

I
I
I
I

_.._.

....

•-IICII

cG-

··-

~

-

-

Q

8

..........

Lake Angelus

_.....,.

8

··-

-

Ml&amp;UIIIIT

..... ........

-

--

----

-

CW&lt;LAND COUNTY
~ c . . . . , ................
1Ha

City of Lake Angelus

Page 5

Master Plan

�Surrounding Influences

LEGEND

A review of the Master Plans and Zoning
Maps of the communities surround~ng
Lake Angelus indicat~ ~actors wh1_ch
may impact upon the City s lo~-dens1ty
residential character. Surrounding Lake
Angelus, planned and zoned land uses
are as follows:

o
•

1
~

®

~ .:&lt;&gt;.

•

II
I
I

2 SINGLE FAMILY

3

L• .

Surrounding Master Plans

•

VERY LOW DENSITY

w
w

•

RURAL/AGRICULTURE

The majority of land around Lake
Angelus is planned for single-family
residential use which will help
preserve Lake Angelus' residential
character.

• •

MULTIPLE
MOBI L E HOME PARK

RECREATION

®

Less compatible uses are the
commercial areas at the 1-75 and
Baldwin interchange and the light
industrial use east of Baldwin Road.

OFFICE. PARKING, TRANSITIONAL

-

; •

,LIGHT

~~

2HEAVY

~~

Public-Quasi Public areas are also
planned to the south of the City.
These facilities could include
churches, schools, or governmental
facilities.

COMMERCIAL

~~

3

EXTRACTIVE , MINING

L~

-I

: : : :,: :

... . . .

I

-I
Surrounding Community Land Use Plans

I

I

City of Lake Angelus

Page6

Master Plan

�Surroundini: Zonini:

• The majority of land su1:ounding ~he
City is zoned for smgle-family
residential.

•

•

1Q
...Jg
···

A sizable area of commercially
zoned property is located on the ~ast
side of Baldwin Road extending
from I-75 south past Lake Angelus
Road.

.,:

, VERY LOW DENSITY
SINGLE FAMILY

i3 •..

3

MULTIPLE

L•

• MOBILE HOME PARK

z

UJ

Q

are zoned for multiple-family
residential.

RURAL/AGRICULTURE

2

f-

• Large areas to the south of the City

....... .
···::···

....
... .
... .. .. .

LEGEND

. ,,.,,

RECREATION

~
~

-~~~

- ........
........
~®·····

I

L ..... .

OFFICE, PARKING, TRANSITIONAL
COMMERCIAL
, LIGHT

2

HEAVY

a EXTRACTIVE, MINING

I
I

Surrounding Community Zoning

City of Lake Angelus

Page 7

Master Plan

�II

II

I

I
I
I
I
I
I

General Characteristics

Population
The tables to the right indicate selected
1990 U.S. Census data on population
characteristics for the City of Lake
Angelus. The population of surrounding
communities is also presented. Key
characteristics are summarized below:

No.
328

%
100.00

167
161

51
49

Under 17

67

20.7

Over65

44

13.4

Pooulation
Female
Male

* The City's population in 1990
was 328 persons
* The number of males and
females was nearly equal

Age Distribution

* The average household size was
2.69 persons in 1990
*

No.
16
51
9
12
80
63
24
29
27
12
5

Under 5 vears
5 to 17 vears
18 to 20 vears
21 to 24 vears
25 to 44 vears
45 to 54 vears
55 to 59 vears
60 to 64 vears
65 to 74 vears
75 to 84 vears
85 vears &amp; over

There were 20.7% of residents
less than the age of seventeen
(17) and 13.4% of residents 65
and older

%
5
15
3
4
24
14
7
9
8
4
1

Households by Type
Total Households
Familv households
Households with related children
Married couple HH
Percent of total
Livinl! alone and 65+

I

Persons ner household

122

105
35
100
95.0
4
2.69

Comparative Population
Lake An!.!elus
Auburn Hills
Pontiac
Waterford Two.
Orion Two.

City of I.Ake Angelus

Page8

328
17,076
71,166
66,692
21.019

Master Plan

�Housing

•

II

•

I

•

II
I
I
I
I
I
I

Housing Units &amp; Occupancy

The tables to the right indicate selected
1990 U.S. Census data on housing
characteristics for the City of Lake
Angelus.
Key characteristics are
summarized below:

1990
138

Total Units

122

There were a total of 138
dwelling units, the vast majority
of which were owner-occupied.

Occunied Units
Owner Occupied
Units
% Owner Occupied

All dwelling units were singlefamily detached.

Renter Occupied
Units

12

Over 70% of the dwelling units
exceeded a value of $300,000,
with a median value of $377,600.

Vacant housinJ!: units

16

110
90.16

3.51
0.00

Owner vacancv rate
Renter vacancy rate

Units in Structure
1 unit, detached
1 unit, attached
2 to 4 units
5 to 9 units
10 or more units
Mobile Home

138
0
0
0
0
0

Value of Owner Occupied Units
Soecified owner-occupied units
Less than $50,000
$50,000 to 99,999
100,000 to 149,999
150,000 to 199,999
200,000 to 299,999
300,000 or more
Median value

97
1
5
5
1
14
71
$377,600

I
I
I
I
I
City of Lake Angelus

Page 9

Master Plan

�II

I

II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

City Facilities and Services

Natural Resources

Because of Lake Angelus' small size, it
does not provide a great array of
services. Rather, the City relies on the
private sector and surrounding townships
to provide its residents with the
necessary services.

The lake and the surrounding woodland
and wetland areas define the unique
character of the City of Lake Angelus
and provide many areas for scenic
residential development. This attractive
environment had drawn people to the
City and ultimately will continue to
make Lake Angelus one of the most
attractive places in southeastern
Michigan to live.

The current City Hall was built as a
school house in 1917. In 1961, the hall
was renovated and began to be used as a
police station and meeting hall. The hall
serves several community functions and
is the meeting place for the monthly
meetings of the City Council. The City
also owns over 100 acres of public land
that includes Welcome Island and
property on the north and southeast
comers of the City. On the southeast
comer is the Hulbert Wildlife Shelter
and the City Hall.
The City of Lake Angelus is in the
unique position of residing between two
cities and a township. Fire services are
provided by both Waterford and Orion
Townships. The City employs its own
professional police department.
Individual wells and septic fields serve
the majority of residences within the
City. There are a few homes connected
to central sewer and water services
provided from adjoining municipalities.
Remaining utilities are provided as
follows: electricity is supplied by
Detroit Edison, telephone services
supplied by Ameritech, and natural gas
provided by Consumers Power. The
City also has the availability of cable
television service.
The City of Lake Angelus lies within
two different school districts, Waterford
and Pontiac.

The protection and preservation of the
City's special natural features is vital to
maintaining the character of the
community. The significance of the
City's natural resource features are
explained below.
Topography
The City's topography is quite dramatic
and picturesque. On the northern side of
the lake, slopes are steeper and more
predominant. On the southern side of
the lake, the relief is less dramatic and
lowlands are more frequent. The highest
elevation in Lake Angelus is 1060 ft.,
found at the City's most northeast comer
near the intersection of Lake Angelus
Road and Baldwin Road. The lowest
elevation in the City is the lake's
shoreline, an elevation of 950 feet.
Wetlands
Lake Angelus does not have an
abundance of wetlands within the City
limits. There are several small wetland
areas scattered throughout. In the
northeast corner, near the McMathHulbert Observatory, the largest wetland
site measures almost 13 acres.
Water Resources
Lake Angelus is the first in a chain of
lakes including Mohawk Lake, Wormer
Lake and the larger lakes like Loon and
Oakland, which ultimately lead into the
Clinton River. Land to the north of Lake
Angelus drains into the lake through
groundwater runoff and small streams.

City of Lake Angelus

Page JO

Master Plan

�0

a,
D

a,
:,

-,.-.-----, .g
"'
Costa Mesta

c

0

Waterlord Township
Fire District

ANGELUS
Orion Township
Fi re District

FIRE SERVICE
DISTRICTS

City of Lake Angelus
Oakland County, Michigan

r

City Owned Property Outside City limits

o

200

400

eoo-----,~ii
Carlisle Associates, Inc.

Community Planners and u,ndscape Arc:tlltCCIS
/WI Alba&lt;. Mic:tlioan

�-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Properties to the south also drain into the
lake. There are also a number of springs
feeding into the lake. In the 1930's, a
dam was reconstructed to control the
lake levels.

Woodlands
The City of Lake Angelus has deciduous
woodlots ranging from just a few acres
to over a hundred acres. In the southeast
corner of the City, there is a large
lowland hardwood woodlot that covers
almost the entire comer of the City south
of Gallogly Road. Spread through the
eastern half of Lake Angelus, are larger
upland hardwood lots.
The City of Lake Angelus is fortunate to
have such wooded and environmentally
beautiful features. These amenities have
time and time again attracted people to
the area, and continued efforts to
preserve the environmental features is a
primary goal of the City.

City of Lake Angelus

Page 11

Master Plan

�\

... _ _t

'--...

\)r--~-·~
- w-

/

I

'

'
10

l""

- lr3: ■

\.,,

.

(

:.I

#

,:;;

• ft ••
-.::::::---■- .

• ••••

II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II

I
I
II

,,_.,.
_.

..,,

.-

~
r-&gt;
~, I.

'

....

I;•&gt;

G

~ \

1---l :~

~- tr d.'.._ '._

.. .

,' :-- .---1
~

.
~~

./

/ C)
' ' \{)
10)

.. '
.:[
~

'

;}

., .
•

)

'

c::::,

'

J \ ~

..
..

City ofuike Angelus

Page 12

Master Plan

en
0
z

~

0

0

~

�(/J

z

u, C

"'

0

:,
&lt;U
.Q&gt;

~

Cl.C

~~

&lt;(

0

j?-

~

0

...J

o5

0

z

3:
...J
&lt;(

cc
w
z

II

w

•
•
•I

(9

I ~ ~
l

]!;,0

::i
.
Iw

=Ip

ill

~

J

Bi
32
0

"'

3:

.

§

"2

§

.c

§

ii:

I

&lt;Ii

:i
;,;

11
~

~

peo~ Ui"'Plta

I
I
I
I
I

eo

)(J8M8N

.,

I

I

I
I

I

I
I

:I
I

I

_____________ __jI

•
City of Lake Angelus

Page 13

Master Plan

�Transportation

Primazy and Local Roads

The following describes transportation
serving the residents of Lake Angelus.

Primary roads are established by, and the
responsibility of, the Oakland County
Road Commission upon approval of the
Michigan Department of Transportation.
By designating a road as part of the
County Primary System, State and
Federal weight and gas tax revenues can
be obtained for maintenance. All public
roads not classified as interstate, state or
primary roads are local roads.

Interstate Access
The City of Lake Angelus is located only
one-half mile to the south of Interstate
75.
Railroads

II
Ill
I
I

There are no rail lines located in close
proximity in the City.

Baldwin Road, Lake Angelus Road and
part of Gallogly Road are maintained by
the Road Commission of Oakland
County. The remaining portion of
Gallogly Road is maintained by the City
of Pontiac. Within the City limits, every
other road is private. In Table 1, the
breakdown of each road is given and
length and surface supplied.

Airports
General aviation services are available at
the Oakland-Pontiac Airport. Detroit
Metropolitan Airport and Flint Bishop
Airport, both located within an hour's
drive, provide commercial aviation
services.
TABLE 1
Cl~ification

Length

Surface

Baldwin

Public

1 mile

Hardtop

Gallogly

Public

.70 mi.

Gravel

Lake Angelus Shores

Private

1 mile

Hardtop

Lake Angelus Lane

Private

.45 mi.

Hardtop

Lake Angelus Road

Public

2 miles

Gravel

Sleepy Hollow

Private

.20mi.

Gravel

Rip Van Winkle

Private

.30mi.

Gravel

Gray Woods Lane

Private

.5 mi.

Gravel

Private Drive

Private

.4 mi.

Hardtop/gravel

Road

I
I

City of Lake Angelus

Page 14

Master Plan

�•
••·
•II
I
I

-I

Economic Base

Existing Land Use

The City's tax base is primarily provided
by residential use. Commercial and
industrial uses surround the City, but
there are no such uses within the City.
SEV has increased in the last six years .
This rise in assessed value corresponds
with a subsequent rise in all of Oakland
County. Table 2 demonstrates the total
State Equalized Value (SEV) for the last
six years.
Table 2
State Equalized Value
Year
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993

Value in dollars Annual Increase
17,240,700
19,116,160
22,307,100
26,311,250
26,971,000
30,915,900

11%
14%
15%
2%
15%

The City of Lake Angelus is a residential
community. Except for the northeast
and southeast corners of the City, the
majority of the remaining land is single
family residential.
An inventory of the existing land use
includes the following categories:
Sin~le Family Residential Use includes
improved parcels having a single family
residential dwelling unit.
Scientific/Educational Use includes
improved land parcels and facilities
which are held by private owners and are
used for either research or educational
purposes.
The McMath-Hulbert
Observatory is included in the scientific
and educational category.
Open Space/Recreation Use includes
public and private land parcels, either
improved or unimproved, used for nonintensive recreational activities.

Source: Oakland County Equalization Division

Vacant land includes privately owned
land that is not currently being put to an
active use.
~

I

includes Lake Angelus.

TABLE 3
Land Use Breakdown

Land Use Classification

Acres

%

Single-Family
Scientific/Educational
Open Space/Recreation
Vacant
Water
TOTAL

388
9
179
50
440
1066

36
1
17
5
41
100

City of Lak.e Angelus

Page 15

Master Plan

�II

"I
I

-I
I

-I
I

•
'•

GOALS AND POLICIES

�IG

lloals &amp; Policies

Introduction

•I

•

The City of Lake Angelus strongly
believes in the goals and policies
contained in this section and adopts them
as a part of its Master Plan. Goals,
policies, and planning strategies
formulated by the community establish
the framework for public and private
decision-making. Goals reflect the
broadest of human needs and establish
the desired end results of the planning
process.

4.

Study the creation of a natural
conservation buffer surrounding
the
City
through
the
preservation of open space on
private property and City-owned
conservation areas.

5.

Promote
governmental
communication and enforcement
of City ordinances and
amendments.

Policies

While goals tend to be general in nature,
policies set forth a particular approach or
position concerning various issues
related to land use, transportation, and
natural resources. These policies are the
essence of the Master Plan and reflect an
overall strategy for local development.
Clearly defined statements of policy can
go far to minimize arbitrary decisions
and substantiate intelligent, objective
decisions. Policies broaden the scope of
the Master Plan beyond just a series of
maps.

Residential Development
Community Character

and

Policy 1: Maintain and enhance the
unique character of Lake Angelus as
a place to live and enjoy leisure time.
1.1

Ensure that new development
and the redevelopment of
existing land uses promotes an
image that is compatible with
the existing character of the
community.

1.2

Maintain mature trees and
historic structures as an
important element in defining
community character.

1.3

Discourage the conversion of
open space into more intensive
uses.

1.4

Prohibit public lake access to
ensure that future usage of the
lake does not deter from its
character.

General Planning Goals
The following general goals set forth the
desires and aspirations of the
community:

I.

Promote the protection of Lake
Angelus and its shorelines,
wildlife, natural streams,
wetlands, and wooded areas.

2.

Allow future development that
is compatible with riparian, lowdensity residential development.

3.

Manage growth at a rate which
does not damage the natural
features, resources and existing
development patterns.

City of Lake Angelus

Policy 2: Low density land use shall be
promoted due to existing
infrastructure, existing land use
patterns, and the natural capacity of

Page 16

Master Plan

�II
I

II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II

the land to
development.

support

2.1

Single Family Residential is
planned for areas where it is
desirable to maintain existing
low density development
patterns to mitigate impacts on
natural resource conditions,
utility systems, and roads.

2.2

City-owned property around
the perimeter of the City is
planned
for
Open
Space/Recreation land use and
is intended to provide
permanent open space.
Protection and preservation of
these areas will ensure
maintenance and enhancement
of the natural characteristics of
the City while at the same time
broadening
recreational
opportunities in appropriate
areas.

Policy 3: A compatible relationship
between land uses shall be promoted
by providing appropriate land use
transitions and
safeguards to
minimize the potentially negative
impacts on roads, adjacent land uses,
utilities and the environment.
3.1

3.2

3.3

neighboring areas from noise
and visual intrusion.

new

Encourage well designed
architecture and landscaping
which uphold the high quality
image of development within
the community.
The planning of new residences
shall provide for the
preservation of existing trees,
wetlands and open space areas
and other scenic features for
the passive enjoyment of the
neighborhood residents, and,
where possible, for the visual
enjoyment of the City as a
whole.

3.4

Utilities and Services

Policy 4: Only the utilities and services
required to meet the needs of City
residents shall be provided.
4.1

Priority shall be given to the
evaluation of septic fields and
well systems for safety to its
users and the environment.

4.2

Sewer and water service shall
be developed based upon
evidence of cost-effectiveness
and environmental benefit to
the lake and its water quality.

Roadways

Policy 5: The natural beauty of the
roads within the City shall be
maintained to protect the natural
character of the City.
5.1

Expansions or improvements to
roads will be discouraged if
they prove detrimental to the
character of the community.

5.2

The extension of Telegraph
Road north of Walton is
opposed due to the potential
detriment to the character of
the City.

5.3

Roads within the City will be
maintained and improved in an
effort to enhance the natural
character of the City and in
accordance with the Natural
Beauty Roads Program.

Ensure the appropriate
trans1t1ons are provided .
Transitions include screening
measures
to
protect

City of Lake Angelus

Mitigate the impact of new
development on roads within
the City and natural features by
encouraging the use of
combined drives to serve
adjacent properties.

Page 17

Master Plan

�Natural Resources and Open Space
Policies
Policy 6: An integrated open space
system consisting of City-owned
property and private scenic
easements will be studied. The
integral elements of the open space
system include wetlands, woodlands,
floodplains and steep sloped areas.
6.1

The open space plan should be
considered in its totality as a
combination of privately and
publicly owned properties.

6.2

City-owned property is a
principal element of the open
space plan.
It should be
utilized to its maximum
potential as a conservation
resource for the community,
consistent with its natural
beauty and capabilities.
Integrated with the City-owned
property is privately owned
property which would be
voluntarily dedicated to open
space preservation.

6.3

Policy 7:
The protection and
enhancement
of
wetlands,
woodlands, ground and surface water
resources, drainage systems and open
space shall be a key consideration in
land use and development decisions.

7 .1

One of the highest priorities is
to preserve previously
undisturbed wetlands in their
natural state.
7.2

Poor soil areas, such as wet,
organic soils, should be
retained in their natural
condition, and integrated with
the planned open space system.

The open space system and
storm drainage system should
be integrated so as to utilize
natural water storage areas, and
to utilize natural drainage
corridors as a means of
conveying storm water runoff
to the Lake or other discharge
areas.

City of Lake Angelus

Woodland
Woodlands
conservation is important to
protect water, soil and air
quality, mitigate noise
pollution, moderate local
climate and storm hazards,
preserve wildlife habitats, and
preserve aesthetic values and
community beauty.
Development which
is
permitted in and around
wooded areas should be
planned, constructed, and
maintained so that existing
healthy trees and native
vegetation are preserved. This
is especially critical along the
shorelines of Lake Angelus.
The objective should be to
preserve native trees rather than
to rely on removal and
subsequent replanting. The
diversity of woodland areas
should be protected to ensure
the long-term stability and
variety of the species
preserved.

6.4. Flood hazard areas and
wetlands
should
be
incorporated into the open
space system.
6.5

Wetlands - The protection of
wetlands is essential to the
preservation of water quality,
stabilization of stormwater
runoff,
promotion
of
groundwater recharge and
provision of plant and wildlife
habitats.

Page 18

Master Plan

�7.3

I

-I
I
I
I

Groundwater resources Groundwater recharge areas
replenish water levels in
underground storage areas and
supply water to lakes, rivers
and streams. Because the City
has no sewer or public water
system, the protection of the
groundwater resources is vital.
Faulty septic fields could
pollute the groundwater and
directly effect the individual
wells the City relies on for
water.
Since groundwater
resources extend beyond City
boundaries, County and
regional cooperation will be
necessary to effectively
manage this problem.

Policy 8:
An effective working
relationship between the City and
surrounding communities should be
promoted. Planning issues which are
integral to the discussion between the
various bodies should include:
• Promote communication
and enforcement of City
ordinances.
• Involvement
ancl
cooperation with individual
citizens, and citizen groups,
shall be encouraged by the
City at all levels of the
planning process to insure
the inclusion of a
comprehensive range of
community values and
priorities.

Groundwater resources should
be protected from pollution.
Land grading should be
controlled to retain the water
holding characteristics of the
land. Vegetation essential to
the
water
holding
characteristics should be
preserved or, where necessary,
enhanced as part of a
development program.
7.4

• Provisions shall be made
for citizen education and
involvement in all issues
involving or relating to the
creation of, or revision to,
general City planning and
land use policy, by means
of public
education
workshops in addition to
whatever public hearings
may be required by law.

Drainage systems - The
protection of soils, woodlands,
and wetlands within a
watershed
and
proper
management of land use and
development are essential to
the proper management of
storm drainage.
Natural vegetation and
topographical features along
drainage corridors and the lake
shoreline should be preserved.
Uses along the shoreline should
be restricted to those which
minimize
topographical
disturbance leading to
increased runoff, sedimentation
and degradation of water
· quality.

Government Policies

City of Lake Angelus

Page 19

Master Plan

�-II

II

•II

I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II

'

PLANNING STRATEGIES

�p

lanning Strategies

Introduction
OPEN SPACF.IRECREATION

Planning strategies, represented in both
graphic and narrative form, identify the
manner in which goals and policies are to
be implemented.

I
I
I
I
I

Areas designated for Open
Space/Recreation include public
lands and buildings which are
devoted to recreation or
conservation use.

Land Use Plan

Land designated for Open
Space/Recreation is intended to
provide recreation and open space
systems which preserve and
enhance the character of the City.
Protection and preservation of
these areas will ensure
maintenance and enhancement of
the natural characteristics of the
City while at the same time
broadening
recreational
opportunities in appropriate areas.

The Land Use Plan Map, (Map 1)
provided on the following page, serves as
a graphic representation of the City's
goals and policies. The Land Use Plan
Map is not a zoning map, but rather a
generalized guide to the desired future
land use patterns within the City.

In the course of preparing the plan, the
following factors were considered:
existing development patterns,
demographic trends, regional influences,
natural resource conditions, and street
patterns.

Land Use Plan Definitions
The following defines the intent of each
land use plan category:

Concepts and Strate~ies
The following describes key features of,
and the rationale behind, the Land Use
Plan, by category:
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

This category provides for Single
Family Residential and is planned
for areas compatible with existing
low density development patterns.
Such areas are planned as low
density in order to mitigate the
impact on natural resources,
roads, and utilities.
SCIENTIFICIEDUCATIONAL

The future character of the City depends
on protecting areas for residential
development and maintaining existing
neighborhoods. Policy 2 establishes
single family residential use in areas
where it is desirable to maintain low
density to minimize the impact on natural
resources, utilities, and roads. Low
densities are planned to protect an
extensive natural system associated with
Lake Angelus.

This category provides for land
and facilities which are used for
either research or educational
purposes.

City of Lake Angelus

Page 20

Master Plan

�"O
Ill
0

C .. ...-....·.

a:

.c

.. __J

0

a:

□ Residential

0

a,
.0

a,

::,
0

+"''------; -~

c

0

II Scientific/

Educational

/

/

=Open Space I

/

/D

Recreation

..
MOHAWKU&lt;.

J)

LAKE

ANGELUS

LAND USE PLAN

Map 1

City of Lake Angelus
Oakland County, Michigan

200

400

eoo

1600

ii

CaJ1isle Associates, Inc.

City Owned Property Outside City Limits

Community Planner.; and Landscape Arehitects

Arln Arbo&lt;, Mich193n

City of Lake Angelus

Page 21

Master Plan

�SCIENTIFIC I EDUCATIONAL AND
OPEN SPACE

I RECREATION LAND

USE

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-

The designations of both Scientific /
Educational and Open Space/ Recreation
in the Land Use Plan are confined to
areas which are currently used for those
purposes.
However, additional
discussion regarding the preservation of
open space is provided under the
Recreation and Open Space Plan.
Recreation and Open

Space Plan

Open Space/Conservation
A key element of the Master Plan, as
outlined in Policies 1 and 6, is the
integration of natural resources and
features into an open space system.

There are other portions of private
properties that may be significant
wetlands and woodlands in which this
same concept is employed to form a
permanent open space network. The
various mechanisms available to the City
and its residents will be discussed more
fully in the Implementation Strategies
section of this report

Recreation
The remainder of the City property 1s to
be planned for passive recreation
purposes. Passive recreation refers to
those activities that can be done by people
individually and are done leisurely rather
than competitively. The properties
included are:

Map 2 represents the Conservation Plan
which incorporates the following:
•

47 acres south of the City
boundary in Pontiac

•

Welcome Island

•

City Hall Property

•

Hulbert Wildlife Sanctuary

•

4 acres located west of Sleepy
Hollow

These areas should remain undeveloped
and preserved in their natural state. This
will promote Lake Angelus' scenic
amenities and preserve its uniqueness.

•

Staff-Wildlife Sanctuary

•

97 acres located south of Lake
Angelus Road and immediately
west of Baldwin Road

It is not the intent that these areas be
developed for active recreation purposes .
With proper planning, the following areas
can provide recreational uses for the City
while preserving the natural character.
The Staff-Wildlife Sanctuary (Map 3) will
provide a simple nature walk to give
residents exercise possibilities while still
maintaining the Sanctuary's natural
setting. The second recreation site would
be approximately 97 acres located in the
northeast corner of the City. Possible
amenities of the site could include:
•

Boat storage area

The Lake Angelus Shores outlots and
dam site should continue to be preserved
in compliance with their original intent

•

Nature walk

•

Picnic area

In addition to the preservation of publicly
owned property, the creation of a
conservation corridor or "green belt"
around the City would greatly contribute
to protecting the image and character of
the community. Essentially, the corridor
would be a strip of land of varying width
which would be voluntarily preserved
from disturbance by the property owner.

•

Parking

•

Sled hill

City of Lake Angelus

Page 22

Master Plan

�·-·---·····
g
~

i

:i,,.

~
"'i::"

c..·---.
.__)

V

]

s- ·7
(,...,··

j

/- ~-=-

""

~

&amp;-1 7 I 7

1"'
t:::

)

MOHA'

LAKE

~
.

/\

·~

I C'

U
z-z~

la

I

I

POTENTIAL GREENBELT

ANGELUS

CONSERVATION PLAN

Map2

f.,

City of Lake Angelus
Oakland County, Michigan

~

~

§

r£1-L ii

.,..
City Owned Property Outside City Lim"s

~.-.odll-N:.
():rmuwty f'Wnln WIid ~ ~

IWIN'Oof, lolc:HgM

�____________ _

,
0

~

~

..

i

m

),.

::s

00

"'i:
""

---.:

Nature Trai \

,,, ...
~

-~ \
L.

--.._

,,,

?
~

,,

I

-

--

-.

-••,.;---"""&gt;~~,~q+e
~-,
~

' ,_,
\

I ,,

~ ~.,"'•

--~,_ ,~
',.',I

/

I

I

III

I'

I ,..,._~
.__

\
-

f..,
~

[

•••••-

.

;

7

-----I\ '\

I I
''•••••-••
I ,_

I,._.., ___ _ ..

·ty property
.
l'nk
Possible
1 to other c1

~Map3

City of Lake Angelus
Oakland County, Michigan
Carlisle Assoclales, Inc.
Communily Planners and Landscape Architects

Ann Arbor. Michigan

�,_,_ --- -- .........
Q

LAK:~=~~:A~,------l\

~

,sa.

~
~

~
::I

-...,

Oo

EX. VEGETATION

~

I::

/

. .,,,,,,,. - - -

-

III

,,.,,,,, ,,.-

I

I

p

I

r

®

/

\ 'I

n

l

.........

~

II

~

I

0

l

~l•v
k\

I

----------1 \__

0

I

0

&lt;(

0
a:

0

z

~

g
&lt;(

co

I

(

--·

N

v,

EX. TENNIS COURTS

RECREATION PLAN
EX. STRUCTURES

----f
~
-,

[

•®

0
®

PATHWAY SYSTEM

PICNIC AREA

Map4
MITIGATED WETLANDS

BOAT STORAGE

City ol lake Angelus
Oakland County, Michigan

PARKING

SLED HILL

~

ii
-=--=-...::..:
--.~

�These amemttes are demonstrated on
Map 4. The changes were suggested
after reviewing the citizen survey and
development potential with the
environmental features in mind. They
were designed to give the City a place to
gather and enjoy leisure time while, at the
same time, preserving Lake Angelus'
scenic character.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

•
•
•

Roadway Plan
The City of Lake Angelus has several
major transportation concerns: the scenic
preservation of Gallogly Road and Lake
Angelus Road, and; the expansion of
Telegraph Road and other major arterials
around the City.
The expansion and extension of
Telegraph Road north of Walton
Boulevard would have a major effect on
the City of Lake Angelus. Extension of
the road to connect to Gallogly Road is
unacceptable to the City for numerous
reasons. Any Telegraph Road extension
to connect with Gallogly Road would
greatly increase traffic through the City
and thus detract from the residential
setting of Lake Angelus. The extension
would also ruin the natural environment
along Gallogly that is so important to the
City's residents.
The City is committed to the protection of
its roads because they are so vital to the
City's character, natural beauty and
appeal. The preservation of natural
character along Lake Angelus Road and
Gallogly Road is vital. Improvements, if
any, should be done in a manner that
minimizes disturbances along these
corridors. The Natural Beauty Roads Act
establishes guidelines for the protection
of roads of these types and could provide
useful guidance to the City.

City of Lake Angelus

Page 26

Master Plan

�-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

�I
I

E

z

-.
◄

0

0

~

.

111::,--! "',!!!-!~=-i;,r==~
ANGELUS

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

/

GELUS
LAK[

·LAKE A
ANG[L 115

.

(]

*

ANu[ L 115

Map5

-•••

City of Lake Angelus
Oakland County, Michigan

ii

Scenic Road Corridors
Proposed Telegraph Extension

~Aasocull!S.lnc.

Convnulwly

~ and Landscape

Altnhect:I

NV&gt; M&gt;o&lt;. Ulc!,IQan

City of Lake Angelus

Page 27

Master Plan

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-I
-I
'

mplementation
Communication between the City and
various communities and agencies will
greatly enhance the Plan's effectiveness.

Section six of the Municipal Planning Act
requires that a Planning Commission
prepare a Master Plan as the official
policy making document regarding land
use decisions. Implementation of the
Plan is an incremental process, requiring
cooperation between the public and
private sector.

Master Plan Education
Citizen involvement and support will be
necessary as the Plan is implemented.
Local officials should constantly strive to
develop procedures which make citizens
more aware of the planning process and
the day to day decision making which
affects implementation of the Plan. A
continuous program of discussion,
education and participation will be
extremely important as the City moves
towards the realization of the goals and
objectives contained within the Master
Plan.

In an effort to implement the City Master
Plan, several key tools are presented in
the following text.

City Governmental Policies
The Master Plan is the official policy
document regarding the development of
the community. It establishes a series of
goals toward which the entire community
can work. The Plan establishes the
foundation against which public and
private development proposals can be
measured. Too often, local officials and
citizens find themselves in a reactive role
to development proposals within their
community. Without a firm base of
information, communities must either
accede to development pressures or be
criticized for arbitrary denials. In
addition, decisions regarding public
programs and projects are often made
incrementally and not related to any
overall concept.

Plan Updates
This plan should not become a static
document. Circumstances and conditions
may change that influence the policies
embodied in the Plan. The City Planning
Commission should attempt to reevaluate and update portions of it on a
periodic basis.
The Planning
Commission should set goals for the
review of various sections of this Plan on
a periodic basis.

Implementation Tools

Intergovernmental Cooperation

Zoning- Zoning is the development
control that has been most closely
associated with planning. Originally,
zoning was intended to inhibit nuisances
and protect property values. However,
zoning can also serve additional purposes
which include:

In an effort to make the Lake Angelus
Master Plan more effective, coordination
between governmental units must be
promoted. The future of Lake Angelus
will be influenced by the decisions of
communities which surround the City
and of agencies with responsibilities that
supersede those of the City. Lake
Angelus officials must not only be aware
of City-wide issues and concerns, but
they should also be aware of issues
surrounding the City that could affect it.

City of Lake Angelus

1) Promoting orderly growth in a
manner consistent with land use
policies and the Master Plan.

Page 28

Master Plan

�2) Promoting attractiveness and
variety in the City's physical
environment by providing
variation in lot sizes, etc.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

3) Guiding development away from
undesirable areas such as
wetlands and current City-owned
open space.
4) Preserving and protecting existing
land uses until such time as they
may change in accordance with
the Master Plan.
The zoning ordinance and official map, in
themselves, should not be considered as
the major long range planning policy of
the City. Rather, the Master Plan should
be regarded as a statement of planning
policy and the zoning should be used to
assist in implementing that policy.

Conservation Greenbelts
A "greenbelt'' is a contiguous, interrelated
open space buffer either surrounding or
intertwined within an entire community.
The purpose of the conservation
greenbelt would be to maintain a "green
ring" of open space around the City that
would preserve the natural character of
the community. The resources protected
in a greenbelt may include drainage
courses, wetlands, wildlife areas, and
woodlands. The preferable method of
establishing the conservation greenbelt is
through the use of private voluntary
techniques.
The following recommendations are
made to develop a successful and
complete conservation greenbelt and open
space program.

Special Purpose Ordinances - Control of
land use activities need not be confined to
the Zoning Ordinance. Special purpose
rules and regulations often complement
the Zoning Ordinance and make it more
effective.

The following special purpose ordinances
have already been adopted by the City of
Lake Angelus, but should be reviewed to
ensure compatibility with the Master
Plan.

•

Develop programs around a clear
vision of the future.

•

Rely on voluntary efforts on the
part of affected property owners.

•

Build strong community support.

•

Document and publicize benefits
of open space preservation.

•

Think and plan on a communitywide level.

Wetlands Protection Ordinance

Water Quality

Lot Split Ordinance

For the majority of residents, the lake and
its surrounding environment is the very
focal point that attracted them to the City.
Its protection for the residents of the
City, whether present or future, is a vital
part of the Master Plan. Efforts to protect
the lake would benefit:

Water Quality Board Ordinance
Nuisance Ordinance
These ordinances along with future
ordinances, will prove to be important
tools for regulating growth and
development in the City.

City of Lake Angelus

Page 29

•

fish and wildlife habitat

•

ecological processes

•

scenic and recreational activities

Master Plan

�I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

I

'I

A relationship between land use and
water quality is evident. The emphasis
on water quality protection programs is
changing to focus more on lands next to
the lake and within its watershed
boundary. To preserve and improve the
lake's water quality, the following are
strategies that could be used:

•

Develop a buffer zone around the
lakes' shoreline. Within this
boundary, vegetation removal
would be monitored and restricted
where applicable.

•

Reduce land disturbances on
steep slopes. This would reduce
erosion, pollution from stormwater runoff and sedimentation.

•

be considered. Since disturbances along
the designated roadways are limited,
improvements may be restricted.

City Recreation Space
Scenic and passive recreation space for
the residents of Lake Angelus is an
important asset to the community. Plans
for the Staff-Wildlife Sanctuary and the
Recreation Property located on the
northeast comer of the City preserve
these natural areas while allowing
pedestrian access and enjoyment. It is
the intent of the Recreation Plan to
improve the two parcels for the
community's enjoyment, while
maintaining the scenic beauty of both
sites.
Improvements to both sites, as illustrated
in Maps 3 &amp; 4 would accomplish two
important things:

Eliminate the use of lawn
fertilizers and pesticides that flow
into the lake. To accompany this,
an education program should be
developed to inform citizens what
fertilizers and pesticides are safe
to use.

•

Continue to study and monitor the
water quality.

•

Monitor the impact of waterfowl
population and evaluate measures
to reduce impacts.

Natural Beauty Roads
Stretches of a road with unique
environmental and scenic characteristics
can be protected by designating them
"Natural Beauty Roads" (P.A. 150 of
1970). Guidelines have been established
by the Department of Natural Resources
to protect native vegetation along those
natural beauty roads from destruction by
such things as: spraying, dusting,
salting, cutting, or mowing. Trees may
be trimmed or cut, but sound forestry
practices must be exercised. If natural
beauty road designations are proposed in
the City, the impact the designation may
have on future service provisions should

City of I.Ake Angelus

•

Maintain the scenic quality of the
parcels.

•

Provide a place for citizens to
exercise and congregate.

Improvements could be achieved at a
minimal cost to the community, while
enhancing the City's character. This Plan
would set a precedent for future
development of the remaining Cityowned parcels and promote a land use
concept that demonstrates scenic
conservation and recreational use. The
improvements to the two parcels are as
follows:
Staff-Wildlife Parcel

•

Page 30

Create a scenic pathway that
winds through the Wildlife
Sanctuary.
The path will
accommodate walkers during the
summertime and cross-country
skiers in the winter. The path
will be approximately one mile
long with benches at various
points along the pathway.

Master Plan

�I

I
I

I

97 Acres in N.E. Corner

•

Grade and gravel the existing
parking to accommodate 15 to 20
vehicles at a time.

•

Create scenic pathways through
the site. As with the StaffWildlife Sanctuary, the pathway
should be of sufficient width to
accommodate walkers and crosscountry skiers. Trail benches
would be placed at various points
for seating.

•

I
I
I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

•

Maintain the picnic area. The
picnic area will consist of picnic
tables and barbecue grills. This
area will give the residents of
Lake Angelus a place to
congregate while they play tennis
or use the pathways. The picnic
area could also be used for private
parties through arrangement with
City government. Direct access
from the picnic area to the
pathway would be available.

Planning

Specifically review the Zoning
Ordinance to determine if zoning
district regulations and standards
are consistent with the Master
Plan.

•

Review Wetlands Ordinance to
determine compliance with recent
revisions to State legislation
regulating wetlands.

•

Consider alternative methods to
protect woodlands and regulate
shoreline clearing.
Begin studies of various
alternative methods to promote
conservation buffer (i.e., scenic
easements, etc.)

•

Create a better delineated outdoor
boat storage area. This area
would allow residents to store
their boats in the winter and also
give them a place to put their
trailers in the summer.

Future
Tasks

•

•

Continue studies of lake water
quality. Expand to consider
ground water quality education
program for citizens.

•

Prepare specific plans for Cityowned property if intent is to
develop these properties in
accordance with Master Plan
sketches.

•

Consider regulating major
changes in topography and earth
movement

Commission

After adopting the Master Plan, the
Planning Commission can utilize the
following list of tasks to begin the
implementation process. While the list
may not be exhaustive, it outlines many
areas of priority.
•

Review all ordinances related to
land use and development to
determine consistency with the
goals and policies of the Master
Plan.

City of Lake Angelus

Page 31

Master Plan

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008957">
                <text>Lake-Angelus_Master-Plan_1990s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008958">
                <text>City of Lake Angelus Planning Commission, City of Lake Angelus, Oakland County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008959">
                <text>circa 1993</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008960">
                <text>City of Lake Angelus Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008961">
                <text>The City of Lake Angelus Oakland County, Michigan Master Plan was prepared by the City of Lake Angelus Planning Commission with the assistance of Carlisle Associates, Inc. circa 1993.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008962">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008963">
                <text>Lake Angelus (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008964">
                <text>Oakland County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008965">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008967">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008968">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008969">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008970">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038368">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54758" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59029">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e996caf835a9ae23f83adf50ba7e3028.pdf</src>
        <authentication>af7243ecc4a87f14e6f90d35e19047c8</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1009209">
                    <text>MASTER PLAN
the

CI

Of'

L

Sa,Y,lac ColJll[j, ~icftjga'l

(jlugust 1991

·

*

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

City of Marlette Administrative Structure ..............

ii

OVER.VIEW ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••

1

Physical Features.... . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4

Population Characteristics.............................

10

Co•uni ty Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14

GOALS ARD OBJECTIVES. . . • . . • . . • . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17
17

. ..

Land Us•····•··
Transportation ...•.
Economic Develop~ent.
Housing ............ .
City Administration ..
Quality of Life .•....

19

20
22

23
24

FIGURES ARD TABLES
Figure
I.
Figure II.
Figure III.
Figure IV.
Figure
v.
Figure VI.
Table
Table

I.
II.

.....
... . . . . . . . . . . .

....

...

....

. .,.
. . . . . . . . . ...
. . . . . . ...
. .. . . .

. . .. .

3
5
6

7

..

9

25
8

...

16

Literature Reviewed ................ • • • • • • • • • · • · · · · · • · ·

26

APPENDIX A............................................

27

�CITY OF MARLETTE
CITY COUNCIL
Ken Babich, Mayor
Lana Brooks
Kathy Hardenburg
Donna Lambert
Wayne McDonald
Sam Patrick
Mark Schultz, Pro Tem
Planning Commission
George Heintz, Chairman
Peg Brynes
Chris Clark
Donald Kanicki
Max Kraft
Wayne McDonald
Dr. Donald Robbins
Park Board

·

Karen Campbell, Chairperson

Robert Cudney
Tom Dawson
Tami Hall
Kathy Hardenburg
Kristi Kelly
Cindy Kopacz
Sam Patrick
Bea Ross
City Manager, Charles Zampich
Robert Kiteley, Clerk-Treasurer

ii

L

�r

MARLETTE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

ELECTORATE

COUNCILPERSON

COUNCILPERSON

CITY MANAGER

MAYOR

COUNCILPERSON

POLICE CHIEF
DP.W
WWTP

Cemetery

.....
.....
.....

COUNCILPERSON

J

COUNCILPERSON

COUNCILPERSON

I
ATTORNEY

I

APPOINTED BOARDS
and COMMISSIONS
PARK BOARD

CLERK - Treasurer

PLANNING COMMISSION

ASSESSOR-------------- -- ------------------------------------------ -------------- --- BOARD OF REVIEW
OFFICE STAFF

I

EDC
ZBA

DDA

�Overview
The City of Ma~lette
Sanilac County

is located in the southwest

in Michigan's Thumb,

and Tuscola Counties (see

near the borders

Figure 1).

rich agricultural lands, and its

corner of

Marlette is

of Lapeer

surrounded by

size is characteristic of

many

communities in the Thumb ar~a.
Although

Marlette

is

situated

producing agricultural counties
variety of

industries.

in

in the

The City is

one

of

State, it is

the

highest

home to

a

also an established hub for

surrounding agricultural communities.
trunkline

State

Detroit

M-53 ~isects

metro area to northern

terminates

the

City

and connects

communities in the

Thumb.

the
M-53

in Port Austin.

The City of Detroit is approximately

70 miles south of Marlette.

The City of Saginaw is approximately

50 miles

to ~he west and

miles to

th, southwest of

the City of Flint
M~rJette.

is approximately 58

Port Huron, a

gateway to

Canada, is only 50 miles to the southeast.
Founded as a Village in 1862 Marlette became a City in 1984.
The City is administered by a
City

Manager.

ordinances.

The Ci~y is

Mayor and Council which appoints a
governed by

a charter

and enacted

Six CouncJl mempers and a Mayor-elect serve 4 year

1

�terms.

Three members

Council meetings are
month.

are elected

two years.

held on the first and third

Regular

Mondays of the

The City's fiscal year runs from July 1st to June 30th.

Various boards and
also

every

execute

Development
Appeals

City

These

objectives.

Corporat~on,

and Park and

commissions, appointed by
include

Planning Commission,

Recreation Board.

Authority (DDA) was established in 1991.

2

City Council,
the

Economic

Zoning

Board of

A Downtown Development

�&lt;&lt;I

+&lt;S'
'Y"'
~o

~

w

SAGINAW'

BAY

~

~

H

....,... ,

I
I

LOCATION MAP
City of Marlette, Sanilac County, Michigan

-- - - --

�►

Physical Features
Highway

runs

M-53

Chesapeake and

Ohio (CSX) Railroad

also passes through the
majority
Most

of ~he

of the

southern third
53.

north-south

City's

City's

from Port

The
Saginaw

As expecteq, the

commercial development

industrial development

~arlette.
Hu+on to

City (see Figure II).

is

is along
located in

M-53.

the

of the City while some is also dispersed along M-

The Gi~y•~ industrial

treatment

through

~lant on

Township airport is

the

park is located

eastern side

of

located off of M-53

Well-est~blished re~idential areas can

near the wastewater
the community.

and south of

The

the City.

be found alon9 the City's

side streets (see Figure III).
General

soils

in

tl)e

community

are

well-suited

to

residential and othe+ forms of urban development (see Table I and
Figures IV and V).

the largest single soil group is comprised of

dry loam~, which cove~ approximately 65 percent of the community.
Soil group Number 5 could pose problems for development due to a
high water table.

These soils typiqally coincide with drainage

4

�I

Lake Huron

Saginaw

Saginaw

M-21
Por

Flin

St. Clair C

-----7

--

______ 1,--,

•

Lake
St. Clair

J-94
Canada

NORTH

FIGURE II
5

b

-

.

�FIGURE ill

IIHllf
11111

City of Marlette
Sanilac County, Michigan

EXISTIIlG LHilD USE map

fllll

From the GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 1980

~

RESIDENTIAL

.:=} COMMERCIAL
,u,1111,
C

8

O

:❖:,:,:,:.:,:.

PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC

ffHllfl

~,., I
Iltrr&amp;J

MANUFACTURING ANO INDUSTRIAL

m

RECREATION

TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS ANO UTILITIES

□ AGR I CUL TUR AL

ANO VACANT LANO

6

�►

CITY

OF

MARLETTE

n

0
LEGENO
CO~TY LINE
CORP()IIATE LtflltTS

-·--·-

501LS

STREET SYSTEMS
STAT£

TFWNKUNE

cou,crr

PRIMARY

COUNTY LOCAL
MAJOR STRHT

FIGUl2f::

LOCAL STRtET
CtT y OR
STJ!f[T

aam:IUft

orr,ccs

0

ADJOINING

VILLA(;(

CITY

7

IV

�TABLE l

VILLAGE OF MARLETTE AND ENVIRONS:SOILS FROM SCS AND MICHIGAN EXPERIMENT STATION SOIL SURVEY, 1961
SOlL
RESOURCE
NO.

SOIL
DESCRIP.

Ory, sandy and
gravelly soils

2

-------------Ory, sandy and

gravelly soils over
clay and . loam soils

3

4

------------------Ory loams, silt and

~

ACRES

155
6%

75
3%

1820

clay loams; fine,
sandy loams

65%

and gravelly soils

,06%

-----------------Wet, level, sandy

RESIDENTIAL
USING
SANITARY
SEWER

TYPE OF
LIMITATION

ROADS
INDUSTRY
COMMERCIAL

ACTIVE

OPEN

( 1)

Slopes over
12%

Well
Adapted Cl)

Well
Adapted (1)

Well
Adapted

Slopes over
12% Lim it in 9

Well
Adapted

Well
Adapted &lt;1&gt;

We 11
Adapted

Moderate 1y well

( 1)

Slopes over
12% limiting

Wel 1
Adapted Cl)

Wel 1
Adapted

Wel 1
Adapted

Well adapted

---------Well adapted
-----------Well adapted
Well adapted
( 1)

(1)

(1)

-------

AGRICULTURE

----------Moderately well
Adapted (4) &lt;2&gt;

------------(4) (2)

(4)

Moderately
High water
Well adapted (3)
Table

Moderately
Well adapted

Poorly
Adapted

Moderately Moderately we 11
Well adapted Adapted (5)

, 194%

Well Adapted (3)

Table

Well adapted

Adapted

Wei 1 adapted

160
6%

Unadapted

High Water

Unadapted

Unadapted

15

---------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------------Wet , 1eve 1 1oam;
5
575
Moderately
High Water Moderately
Poorly
Moderately Well adapted
silt and clay loams;
fine, sandy loams

6

--------------Wet, level peat
and muck soils:
Unstable

(5)

Poorly
Moderately well
Adapted (6) Adapted (5)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL
2800
100~

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1, Adaptability is based on slopes of less than 12%. Adaptability decreases with increase in slope.
2,
3,
4,
5,
6.

Use of irrigation increases adaptability on more level areas,
Not well adapted in natural state due to high water table: lowering water table through drainage increases adaptability.
As slope increases, adaptability decreases due to erosion hazard.
Contingent upon provision of proper drainage for agriculture use,
Unadapted to most recreational uses but has potential for nature study and wildlife areas.

8

�FIGURE V
(
I ,L

,3a,._,,_

R O ,&lt;. O

,.'

18

'

II'. .
Iii

~r ,
1\ .
I

' '
• ' \ •''.,;~ I , ·
\,/ ;
(\
•' •
jl8• ;,

-·

·- . . ..
' '
., \ -,
_ _• .......,._..._ , -◄~--- ,
. ,
. - . . _,

•

I

••

.,

,,

i.

'

�Population Characteristics
In

1980

the

Historically, the

City

of

Marlette•s

City's population has

population

was

increased each

1,761.
decade,

and the latest census shows an increase of 9.3 percent.

In

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

1,641

1,489

1,640

1,706

1,761

1,924

1980

the

mobile

home

Michigan, which translated into
in

Marlette.

Three hundred

manufacturing

industry

a loss of an estimated
of these

jobs have

left

800 jobs

been regained

through an upswing in the economy and local economic

development

efforts to secure new industry for the City.
In 1980, Marlette had 712 housing units; 463 of these units,
or 65 percent, · were owner-occupied.
renter-occupied.

Conversely, 35 percent were

The median value of owner-occupied housing was

$30,200; lower than

the County

value of $31,000

value of $39,000.

10

and the

State

�Median

hou~ehold income

in

the City

was $13,648;

again,

lower than the county rate of $14,950 and considerably lower than
the state rate of $19,223.

The City's per capita income

distributes total

income over

working

or not)

income was

personal
in 1979

was $6,862.

estimated at $9,202

the population
In

1985 the

which represents an

34.1 percent in the six year period.

It is

(which
whether

per capita
increase of

interesting to note,

that although the city had a lower median income than the county,
in 1979

and 1985,

county as a whole.

the

per capita

income was

higher than

the

County per capita income figures for 1979 and

1985 were $5,932 and $8,303, respectively.
Median
figures.

The

age

city is

state median is

County median age
median

in the

stands at

age is 33.2 years

higher

than county

28.9 years of
30.5 while the

of age.

In 1980,

age.
City of

and state

The

Sanilac

Mariette's

18.6 percent of the

population was over 65 years of age.
Another point of
the

interest in

Mariette's population,

where

ratio of males to females within the population is generally

50/50, in the city 55.3 percent of the population is female.

11

�Given the relatively large senior population, it is likely

there

are many single person, female senior households in the city.
The
City

Michigan Employment

of

Marlette's

Marlette.
better

employment

In 1987 the

than the

Commission includes

figures with

area unemployment rate

county's average

average of 8.2 percent
Since 1984

Security

the

Township

of 10.1 percent,

rate has decreased

of

was 6.8 percent,

and the region's average of

the unemployment

the

the state's
9.2 percent.

yearly from

11

percent in 1984 to 8.8 percent in 1985, and to 7 percent in 1986.
The number of

people in the work

time period which
significant.

force has increased

makes the reduction of

In 1984

the area labor

over this

unemployment much more

fQrce was 1,627; in

1985,

1,630; in 1986, 1,875 and in 1987, 1,950.
Due to the City's establishment following the 1980 Census,
there is limited

specific information

addition,

much

collected

only at th~ county level.

is

affected by

of

the

the county

existing

as a

on the City

demographic

proper.

information

is

Since the City of Marlette

whole, it

would be

include some county-wide information in this discussion.

12

In

useful to

�In 1983,

14.2 percent

some form of public
27th

(of 83

of the qounty•s

assistance.

counties)

in

the

At that time, the county ranked
st~te

individuals on public assistance.
the

percentage

decreased
to 40th

of

the

population

to 10.3 percent in 1987,
in the

State for

public assistance.

In

population received

for

its

percentage

of

Fortunately, since that time,
on

public

assistance

has

The county's ranking dropped

the percentage of

its population

1987, l9,4 percent of the

on

population was

receiving social security benefits which is higher than the State
average of 15.5 percent.

When

examining an age pyramid

for the county

in 1980, one

can see that the largest percentage of people were between 10 and
24 years of age.
years of age.

In 1989, these individuals ranged from 19 to 33

This

may explain the increase in the

labor force

even though the County population has decreased over time.

13

�Community Resources

All

Marlette

school

district

facilities

(Bea

McDonald

Elementary, Marl~tte Middle and Marlette High) a~e located within
the City.

The District povers a 150 squa+e ~ile ~rea and serves

approximately 1,500 students with
of Marl~tte

54 percent living in the

and Marlette Tow~ship.

The City also

City

has a 48-bed

hospital with a~ assofiated 43-bed extend~d ~edical care facility
an~ 24 senior citiz~n apa~tments.
t~e peadquarter~
which provides

Meado~

Another un~qu~ institution is

of Teen Ranch, a licensed
vital services to families

Ridge ~part~ents,

a new

human service agency
throughout the state.

24-unit ~enior

citizen complex

will open in August, 1991.
The City

services.

of

Marlette has

A newly upgraded

sequencing batch reactor
capaqity is

690,000

pr9v~de between

the usual

complement of

public

wa~tewater trea~ment system

with a

handles all city

gallons per

~70,000 ~nd

day.

sewage.
Three

300,000 gallons

Total

plant

~unicipal

wells

of water

per day.

Excess water storage capacity, of 200,000 gallons, is stored in

14

�an

elevated

Edison and
full-time
operate

tank.

police

officers

the volunteer

provided by

of

7.

serve

fire

town

in the

p~ovided for citizens Dy
to the city.

Sixteen

department which

has an

firemen
insurance

Service (ambulance)

is operated by

The City's

township.

by Detroit

Three certified

the city.

Emergency Medical

volunteers.

provided

Gas Company.

Marlette ttospital and

st~ff aµd ~everal
of

utilit ies are

Southeastern Michigan

class rating

south

Modern

Solid

one full-time

cemetery is

located

wast~ collection

a private nauler who is

is

is

under contract

A curbside recycling program began July 1, 1991.

Marlette ~as

a fine complement of

~) wnich provide hundreds of jobs.

ind4stries (see appendix

The City ha~ long

recognized

the value of manuf~cturing facilities and attempts to promote the
health of existing firms while attracting new ones.

15

�TABLE I I
STATE EQUALIZED VALUATIONS (SEV)

OF THE CITY
1989

Real Property -

$ 12,941,500

$ 14,048,200

Personal Property -

1,854,500

2,255,100

TOTAL

$14,796,000

$ 16,303,300

IFT

$

600,200

563,700

1990

1991

Real Property -

$14,747,300

$ 16,126,700

Personal Property -

2,365,300

2,345,200

TOTAL

$17,112,600

$ 18,471,900

IFT

$

5?3,900

$

664,300

The Industrial Facility Tax (IFT) represents
properties which have been granted a tax
abatement and enjoy a 1/2 tax rate and are
therefore separated from the Real or Personal
Property SEV, The official value (SEV) is on the
increase and the population has increased almost
10% between 1980 and 1990.

16

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives put forth in this section are the
direct result of research conducted on local data sources
(community surveys, newspapers, Council minutes and City files)
and some
interaction with community leaders.
Goals and
objectives are categorized into sections, which include:
Land
Use, Transportation, Housing, City administration and general
quality of life issues.

A.

LAND USE

General Goal
1.

PROMOTE EFFICIENT USE OF CITY LAND WHICH PROTECTS BOTH
NATURAL AMENITIES AND INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.

Objectives
1.

Consider the closing of Morris Street between the bank and
hotel to create a pedestrian mall as a downtown amenity.

2.

Protect residential areas from encroachment of commercial and
industrial development.

3.

Investigate innovative land use control techniques that may
provide flexible options to developers while maintaining
quality development within the City. Some of these
techniques may include zero lot lines for commercial or
residential areas, provisions for cluster zoning and a site
plan review process.

4.

Promote adherence to building codes and consistent
application of those codes in the City which will promote
and maintain high quality development.

17

�5.

Adopt development standards for use during the site plan
review process in order to retain the small town character
of the City of Marlette.

6.

Periodically reevaluate adequacy of current sign
regulations, especially with regard to number, square
footage allowed for signs and use of temporary signs.

7.

Create a Conservation Reserve District (CRD) for those areas
that cannot be developed in the City; e . g., park lands.

8.

Keep future industrial uses in close proximity to M-53 and
railroad access, yet isolated from residential development.

9.

Protect the integrity of historical structures in the
community.

10.

Deter strip commercial development along M-53. Encourage
access roads that lead into blocks of commercial lands that
front major corridors.

11.

Review zoning ordinance text and definition and map (see
Figure V) for appropriateness with current development
objectives and community needs.

12.

Promote development of additional single family homes in the
City.

13.

Provide zones for modern multi-family home development.

14.

Promote high quality rental housing in the City. Discourage
conversions of single family homes into multi-family units.
If conversions are allowed, take measures to prevent poor
quality of haphazard development. Consider annual rental
inspections to help ensure proper maintenance of properties.

18

�15.

Promote future land uses and subsequent land use zones that
coincide with the future land use map and the aforementioned
objectives outlined in this section.

B.

TRANSPORTATION

General Goal
1.

FACILITATE THE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND VEHICLES THROUGHOUT
THE COMMUNITY BY UTILIZING THE SAFEST, MOST EFFICIENT MEANS
POSSIBLE.

Objectives
1.

Severely restrict curb cuts (driveway entrances and exits)
along business strips. Increased traffic movements from
multiple curb cuts result in highly congested business
strips. There should be access to commercial development
from smaller feeder roads that run parallel to the main
thoroughfare whenever feasible.

2.

Assess the need for sidewalk improvements within the City.

3.

Work with the County to investigate the feasibility of

providing improved mass transportation services to the City.
4.

Cooperate with surrounding communities to improve bike path
and walkway networks between communities.

5.

Support the upgrading of M-53; e.g., resurfacing and curb
and gutter through town as needed.

19

�C.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

General Goals
1.

PROMOTE A STRONG, DIVERSE ECONOMY IN THE CITY, CREATING
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOR RESIDENTS AND POTENTIAL
RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY.

2.

USE COMMUNITY RESOURCES IN THE MOST EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL
MANNER POSSIBLE, WHILE MAINTAINING HIGH QUALITY SERVICES.

Objectives
1.

Increase the tax base of the City of Marlette by stimulating
development in the City to strengthen existing property
values and prevent property deterioration.

2.

Promote the City as a small regional service provider and
encompass a 15-20 mile radius as a service area.

3.

Improve the quality of life for residents by stimulating
additional business as a consequence of economic
development thereby easing the tax burden for City services.

4.

Analyze the current tax abatement policy. Monitor abated
properties to ensure the City's economic development
objectives are being met. Consider agreements which
provide qualified Marlette residents with jobs before they
are advertised in other areas.

5.

Promote Marlette as a community amiable to industrial
development.

6.

Endeavor to more effectively market the City and its
amenities and economic opportunities to prospective
businesses.

20

�•

7.

Work closely with resource groups which can be of assistance
to units of government with economic development issues;
i.e., the County EDC, Community Growth Alliance, Chamber of
Commerce, Regional Planning agency, etc.

8.

Communicate with surrounding units of government and
cooperate, when feasible, with regard to economic
development efforts.

9.

Focus significant economic development efforts on business
retention in the community.

10.

Actively seek to expand development and service provision
opportunities through physical expansion of the City and
through provision of essential services to outlying areas.
Parking areas and high traffic generation; e.g., fast food
service and convenience store/gas station), should be
confined to more intensive commercial districts.

11.

Study the implementation of a City income tax for income
generation within the city by non-residents.

12.

Promote a diverse cross section of high quality commercial
development in the City. Promote and encourage improvements
in facades, window displays, signage and street-scapes.

13.

Market retail products more heavily to workers in area
factories. It is suspected that many of them commute into
the area to work and are not treated as a viable market for
community products; i.e., coupon specials and newsletters
distributed with time cards may stimulate this market.

14.

Attempt to recruit a wider variety of service or commercial
enterprises such as a health clinic, additional doctors,
variety/clothing store, fast food restaurants, roller rink,
agricultural support businesses.

15.

Improve directional signage to community parking areas and
community facilities throughout the area.

21

�16.

D.

Investigate the use of rental incentives in vacant
businesses .

HOUSING

General Goal
1.

PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY, SAFE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL
CITIZENS , PRESENT AND FUTURE, OF THE CITY OF MARLETTE.

Objectives
1.

Diversify housing opportunities through promotion of
alternative forms of housing units such as senior high-rise,
duplexes, four and eight unit multi-family and condominiums.

2.

Investigate the feasibility of forming a City Housing
Commission.

3.

Where appropriate, work more closely with the State Housing
Authority's home rehabilitation, home energy analysis and
rental rehabilitation programs. Apply for assistance under
MSHDA programs.

4.

Foster communications with local banks and encourage them to
participate in the Michigan State Housing Authority's low
interest
loan
programs
for
housing
rehabilitation ,
especially for seniors.

5.

Retain the character of core residential areas in the City.
Promote maintenance and upgrading of existing housing stock.

6.

Encourage builders to become involved in the Michigan State
Housing Authority's tax incentive programs.

22

�E.

CITY ADMINISTRATION

General Goal
1. USE COMMUNITY RESOURCES IN THE MOST EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE
MANNER POSSIBLE FOR THE DELIVERY OF HIGH QUALITY SERVICES TO
THE CITIZENRY.
Objectives
1. Make a concerted effort to take advantage of State and
Federal grant opportunities.
2. Streamline administrative functions whenever possible; e.g.,
licensing and permitting processes.
3. Foster cooperation and communication with surrounding units
of government regarding to service delivery.
4. Investigate licensing of rental housing units in an effort

to promote quality development in the City.
5. Determine the feasibility of a formal City Task Force to
promote communication and coordination amongst boards,
commissions and civic groups within the City.
6. Encourage volunteerism and cooperation among citizen groups
in the community. Recognize the value of the community's
civic groups.
7. strengthen code enforcement in the City.

e.

Increase public relation activities in all City departments.

9. Provide several copies of all City ordinances, plans and
reports to the City library. Attempt to secure such
materials from surrounding communities.

23

�QUALITY OF LIFE
General Goal

1. ENHANCE ALL CITIZEN'S QUALITY OF LIFE BY INCREASING THE
CITY'S ECONOMIC, RECREATIONAL AND VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
WHILE MAINTAINING A SAFE AND HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT.
Objectives
1.

Upgrade the appearance and viability of establishments in
the City of Marlette.

2.

Support an area-wide "911" system. Work to upgrade the
existing system with more ·sophisticated equipment and an
integrated network.

3.

Communicate regularly with area human service programs at
the local, county and state level. Educate residents to the
opportunities available to them.
Provision of an
informational flier with billings is an economical way to
achieve this goal.

4.

Participate in an area-wide composting and recycling
program in an effort to provide recycling opportunities for
City residents and implement the County's solid waste plan.

5.

Execute the City ' s current Recreation Plan.

24

�--IICIE-z~
I

.
I

'

i

'

·- ;_ J

~

3

~;,1.----~
~

:

VILLAGE OF MARLETTE
ZONING 11AP
FIGURE VI

25

�LITERATURE REVIEWED

City Council Minutes, 1986 - January 1989
Economic Development Commission Minutes, 1987 - January 1989
Michigan Department of
Planning.

Natural Resources,

Community Recreation

Michigan's 1987-1988 Recreation Action Program;
_B_u_i_l_d_i_n_g~M_ic_h_ i-g_a_n_'_s__R_e_c_r_e_a_t_io_n__F_u_t_u_r_e~•~ Michigan
Natural Resources (MDNR).

An Element
Department

of
of

Marlette City Charter
Marlette City Ordinances
Marlette General Development Plan, 1980
Marlette Recreation Plan, 1979.
Recreation Board Minutes, 1988 - January 1989
Sanilac County Data Series
The Marlette Leader, 1988 - January 1989
Thumb Area Recreation and Tourism Analysis, 1975, Michigan State
University Departments of Parks and Recreation and Resource
Development. Authors , Moncrief and Houck.

26

�APPENDIX A

27

�CITY OF MARLETTE
SANILAC COUNTY

ACTIVE HOMES CORP
7938 S VAN DYKE
P. 0. Box 127 (48453)
Phone ....... (517) 635-3532
Emp: 95. Est: 1960
Sq. Ft: 400,000
Annual Sales: $5.1-lOmm. Export
SIC: 2452

OETIKER IMC
3305 Wilson Street
P.O. Box 217 (48453)
Phone ......... (517) 635-3621
Emp: 76. Est: 1961. Import
SIC: 3429

D GP Inc
3260 Fenner
P. o. Box 155
(48453)
Phone ....... (517) 635-7531
Emp: 25. Est: 1982
SIC: 2221

PLASTA FIBER INDUSTRIES, IMC.
6300 Euclid Street (48453)
Phone ..... (517) 635-7536
Emp: 200 Est: 1953
SIC: 3714

GM R INDUSTRY
6587 Warner Street (48453)
Phone ...... (517) 635-2814
Emp: 3. Est: 1977.
Sq. Ft.: 6,000. Import/Export
SIC: 3559 3599 3714

SANILAC STEEL, INC
2487 South Van Dyke
P. 0. Box 185
(48453)
Phone ...... (517) 635-2992
Emp: 10. Est: 1967
Sq. Ft.: 6,500
Annual sales: $5.1-lMM.
SIC: 3441

GENERAL MACHINE (see GMR
INDUSTRY)

SNOW SCREW PRODUCTS IMC

MARLETTE CONCRETE PRODUCTS IMC
3370 Warner St (48453)
Phone ...... (517) 635-3575
Emp: 9. Est: 1940.
Annual Sales: $101-500M
SIC: 3273 3272

3487 s Main St (48453)
Phone ...... (517) 635-2521
Emp: 8. Est: 1955
Sq. Ft: 10,000
Annual Sales: $5.1-lMM.
SIC: 3599

28

�•
MARLETTE LEADER
305 Kain
(48453)
Phone •....• (517) 635-2435
Emp: 3. Est: 1877
SIC:

2711

TANGENT TOOL

&amp; EHGRG INC.
3410 S Kain
P. o. Box 265
(48453)
Emp: 15. Est: 1967
Sq. Ft: 10,000
Annual Sales: $5.1-lKK.
SIC: 3599

METAL CRAFT CO
Div Grant Inds. Inc.
2900 Boyne Road
(48453)
Phone ...... (517) 635-7401
Emp: 14. Est: 1936.
SIC: 3469

29

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009195">
                <text>Marlette_Master-Plan_1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009196">
                <text>City of Marlette Planning Commission, City of Marlette, Sanilac County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009197">
                <text>1991-08</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009198">
                <text>Master Plan for the City of Marlette</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009199">
                <text>The Master Plan for the City of Marlette was prepared in August 1991 by the City of Marlette Planning Commission.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009200">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009201">
                <text>Marlette (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009202">
                <text>Sanilac County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009203">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009205">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009206">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009207">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009208">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038383">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54778" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59049">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/84bd4d05f87e6183b8e83401485d025f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2f126f560ad5f63167bc285fe6be1593</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1009525">
                    <text>City of New Buffalo
Michigan

GENERAL PLAN - UPDATE 1994

�f
r
r
J
J

City of New Buffalo
Michigan
:~:===~~~~·-;,,·,,·,•,,,',' , ',' -

. ;f~

r

GENERAL PLAN - UPDATE 1994

�CITY OF NEW BUFFALO, MICHIGAN

CITY COUNCIL
MEMBERS

Howard Covert, Mayor
William Geisler
Ray Wojdula
Hewlett Bean
Gordon Christopher

PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS

Alice Drenten
Florence Ruszkowski
Otto Zack
Tony Mrozek
Jim Dombrowski
Mark Krauskopf
Judy Smith
George Schlecta
John Otto

Douglas Hedges, City Manager

Public Consulting Team
Charles R. Eckenstahler - Planning Consultant
P.O. Box 1047
115 West Main Street
Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023
219-879-1012

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION ONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5
5

SECTION TWO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GOALS AND POLICES OF THE GENERAL PLAN . . . . . . . .
Background and Community Development Goals . . . . . . .

7
7
7

SECTION THREE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE PLANNING AREA . . ... .
Planning Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface and Subsurface Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Regulated Lands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13
13
13
13
15

SECTION FOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
POPULATION ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Historic and Projected Population Growth . . . . . . . . . . .
Seasonal Population Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Findings and Conclusions Regrading Population Trends . . .

17
17
17
18
23

SECTION FIVE ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..
EXISTING LAND USE .. . .. . .. . .
Land Use Survey . . . . . . . . .
Existing Land Use Tabulations .

25
25
25
25

SECTION SIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LAND USE PLAN . . . . . . . . .
Summary of Current Plan
Land Use Plan - 1994 ..

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

. . . . . . . . . . . . ...
. .. . . . . . . . . ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .. .. .. . ... . ..

. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . ...
. ... . . . . . . . . .

. .
. .
. .
. .

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

. . .
. . .
. . .
...

29
29
29
31

�LIST OF FIGURES

Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure

123456-

Planning Area . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Regulated Land Development Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Population Trends and Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Generalized Existing Land Use .... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .
1968 Land Use Plan .. . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . .. .. .... .
1993 Land Use Plan . . . . . . . .. . . . .... .. ... . .. . . .

14
16
18
28
30
36

LIST OF TABLES

Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table

123456-

Historic Population Trends . . . . . . .
Household Data .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tenure By Age of Householders . . . .
Other Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Age by Sex and Total Population . . .
Existing Land Use Tabulations . . . . .

.
.
.
.
.
.

. .
..
. .
. .
. .
. .

.
.
.
.
.
.

. . . . . . . . . . .
...........
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .

.
.
.
.
.
.

17
21
21
22
22
26

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

SECTION ONE

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the General Plan - Update 1994, is to set forth an updated
strategy for the City of New Buffalo to guide its future development. The Plan
will assist community leaders to provide for community needs, both present and
future. It will also be used to guide land use decisions made by the City Planning
Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals and the City Council as they perform
there respective duties and responsibilities.

The General Plan - Update 1994, builds on plans and policies previously
prepared and adopted by the City of New Buffalo. Prior to this Plan, a seven
section plan document was prepared between March 1966 and January 1968. The

General Plan, as formally adopted by the Planning Commission and City
Council, consists of a comprehensive series of analyses which includes:
- History of the City
- Physiography (soils, geology, etc)
- Existing land use
- Economy
- Population; existing and future
- Housing and elimination of blight
- Future land use
- Transportation needs
- Community facilities needs
- Central business district needs
- Capital improvements
- Zoning ordinance
- Subdivision regulations

Public Consulting Team

Page 5

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Pursuant to State of Michigan enabling legislation, it is the duty of the City
Planning Commission to adopt the plan and present the plan to the City Council
and general public.

The General Plan - Update 1994 has been prepared in

accordance with the Municipal Planning Commission Act and was presented to
the public at a public hearing held on February 1, 1994. It has been formally
adopted by the City of New Buffalo Planning Commission on September 6, 1994.
Pursuant to the recommendation of the City Planning Commission, the City
Council, by resolution endorsed the General Plan - Update 1994 on September

20, 1994.

Public Consulting Team

Page 6

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

SECTION TWO

GOALS AND POLICES OF THE GENERAL PLAN
Background and Community Development Goals
In the General Plan of 1968, a series of ten community development goals were
established to act as guides for the rational decision making procedures for the
location and density of land uses designated in the land use plan. In recent time,
the importance of the specific goal and policy statements have been demanded of
municipalities by the court system as explanatory information pertaining to
decisions rendered by municipal Planing Commissions and other City agencies
which issue land uses decisions.

This section summarizes goals and policies for land use and other development
issues of the City of New Buffalo. They have been prepared based on research
documented in this General Plan - Update 1994 and the previous research
documented in the General Plan as adopted by the Planning Commission and
endorsed by the City Council.

In the following paragraphs, the goals for development of the City of New
Buffalo are presented. The goal is a statement of desired outcome. Policies are
tools, statements of what will be acceptable and what will be discouraged as the
Planning Commission evaluates specific proposed development projects .

Public Consulting Team

Page 7

�City of New Bil//a/o, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Land Use:

CONTROL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY, AS WELL AS
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND
ALLOCATIONS IN LINE WITH INFRASTRUCTURE AND
SERVICE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT.
POLICY:

Maintain balance among residential, commercial,
office, cultural , industrial and open space land
allocations .

POLICY:

Encourage a variety of uses within these land
allocations.

POLICY:

Provide land for industrial uses that are not
intrusive on residential, commercial, and other
areas.

POLICY:

Encourage strict adherence to state and local
environmental performance standards.

POLICY:

Encourage steady improvement of the City parks
and recreation system.

Capital Improvements:

REQUIRE NEW DEVELOPMENTS TO PAY FOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE
THE NEW DEVELOPMENT.
POLICY:

Require that park and recreation facilities be
developed in new subdivisions with the cost paid for
by the developer.

POLICY:

Require that all new developments be serviced by
City utilities and that cost for utilities be paid by the
development.

Public Consulting Team

Page 8

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Public Lands, Places and Structures:

PROVIDE THE CITY WITH FACILITIES THAT ARE
SAFE, EFFICIENT, ACCESSIBLE, AND WELL
LOCATED.
POLICY:

Plan and purchase locations for future municipal
facilities, as early as possible, to provide capacities
for long-term needs.

POLICY:

All construction and development should proceed in
accordance with all appropriate requirements of
ADA and any other federal or state laws dealing
with the disabled.

POLICY:

Plan for the eventual expanded need for housing
additional City services including general office
space, police service, fire services, and public
works operations.

Public Places and Utilities:

DEVELOP MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES
THAT WILL ECONOMICALLY AND ADEQUATELY
SERVICE EXISTING AND ANTICIPATED GROWTH.
POLICY:

Eliminate or reduce flooding and install
retention/detention pond areas where needed.

POLICY:

Plan City water, sewer and storm water drainage
facilities to provide sufficient capacities needed to
accommodate long-term needs.

Public Consulting Team

Page 9

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Transportation:

PROVIDE A SAFE, EFFICIENT AND BALANCED
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM.
POLICY :

Improve the system of thoroughfares to move
people quickly, economically and conveniently.

POLICY:

Plan for orderly development of Buffalo Street,
encouraging the use of existing buildings, whenever
possible and compatible with adjacent land uses, for
commercial purposes.

POLICY:

Create separate bike/walking paths, where needed
and feasible, and create safe, wide shoulders on
street pavement for bicycles when a separate bike
path cannot be built.

POLICY:

Support the improvement of the public
transportation system for the region, linking The
City of New Buffalo to northwest Indiana.

POLICY:

Improve the system of City Streets to encourage
development of vacant land within the City.

Housing:

ENCOURAGE A VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENTS TO PROVIDE A DIVERSE
SELECTION OF RESIDENTIAL TYPES AND PRICE
RANGES.
POLICY:

Maintain predominantly low density single family
neighborhoods .

POLICY:

Attract quality senior citizen housing.

Public Consulting Team

Page 10

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

POLICY :

Encourage increased investment in home expansion.

Appearance:

ENHANCE THE APPEARANCE OF THE ACCESS
POINTS TO THE CITY, THE MAJOR
THOROUGHFARES, AND THE CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT.
POLICY:

Improve the architectural facades of buildings on
the thoroughfares leading to, and in the central
business district.

POLICY:

Landscape the thoroughfares and the central
business district.

POLICY:

Develop and implement a uniform street furniture
design for the thoroughfares and central business
district.

Economic Development:

PROMOTE DIVERSIFIED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
IN ORDER TO ENCOURAGE BUSINESS INVESTMENT
AND INCREASE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES.
POLICY:

Encourage growth of small and light industries and
offices to diversify and strengthen the tax base and
provide employment.

POLICY:

Encourage steady growth of business and
commercial activities in balance with anticipated
needs of population growth.

POLICY:

Maintain and develop the Central Business District.

Public Consulting Team

Page 11

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

POLICY:

Encourage controlled growth of small and light
industries and offices in order to diversify and
strengthen the tax base and provide employment.

Public Consulting Team

Page 12

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

SECTION THREE

PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE PLANNING AREA
Planning Area

The City of New Buffalo has elected to study and discuss the development of a
planning area consisting of all lands within the City and all lands abutting the City
boundary.

This analysis allows the logical planning for the provision of

municipal services to areas outside of the City, should service extensions take
place in the future.

The City planning area is graphically defined on the following page.

Surface and Subsurface Conditions

The General Plan for the City has extensive descriptive information pertaining
to the soil conditions, natural features, climatic, and other natural features which,
in combination, contribute to the unique environment of the City planing area.
Rather than include this information in the General Plan - Update 1994 report
the reader is referred to these documents for additional information.

The two principal surface features which influence the City of New Buffalo are
the Galien River and Lake Michigan. Both natural resources have contributed to
the growth and development of the City since its founding . Both resources will
continue to influence the future of the City.

Public Consulting Team

Page 13

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - UpdaJe 1994

Figure 1 - Planning Area

110

_, ______' --4,
JL
'

t•

••·-•o·

Public Consulling Team

Page 14

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Regulated Lands

In 1968, the emphasis on environmental protection was not as pronounced as it
is today . Therefore, environmental planning was not included in the General
Plan. Preservation of unique natural features including wetlands, sand dunes and

wildlife habit was not an issue and therefore was not regulated to the extend as
today .

Throughout Michigan, Indiana and other states, establishment of

floodplains, floodways, sand dune preserves, shoreline and river development set
back areas are commonly included as development restrictions which must be
observed in the planning and development process The City is affected by these
restrictions and the land use plan for the planning area considers these additional
regulations in the allocation of land for future development purposes.

On the following map is shown the land areas regulated as wetlands, floodplain
and costal zones as administered by the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Public Consulting Team

Page 15

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Updale 1994

Figure 2 - Regulated Land Development Areas

-- --:

_ __r

-,
I

Public Consulting Team

Page 16

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan • Update 1994

SECTION FOUR

POPULATION ANALYSIS
Historic and Projected Population Growth

The General Plan prepared in the 1960's analyzed population data for the years
1930 to 1960. The Plan also provided a forecast of future population for the
years 1970, 1980 and 1985. Historic population information is provided in the
following table:
Table 1 - Historic Population Trends

Year

.,::c:.,/\ •.•

Population Count
From Census

Population
Projections (1)

1930

1,015

1940

1,190

1950

1,565

1960

2,128

1970

2,784

2,844

1980

2,821

3,977
4,851

1985
1990

Notes:

Population
Projections (2)

2,317

2000

2,829

2010

2,838

Actual counts taken from the U.S. Census
(1) Projection from the City of New Buffalo General Plan prepared by City Planning Assoc .
(2) Projections by Southwestern Michigan Commission; the State designated Regional Planning
Agency

Public Consulting Team

Page 17

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Figure 3 - Population Trends and Projections

POPULATION TRENDS 1930 - 2010
3
:Z.9

2.8
2.7
2.6
2.5

2.4
2.3

:z .:z
2.1
2
1.9

1.8
1.7
1.6
1 . !I

1.4
1,3
1,2

1.1
1

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

YEAR

Seasonal Population Estimates

The City of New Buffalo is unique in that its population, the number of people
residing in the City substantially increases in the summer months. This seasonal
population increase is a major planning concern since the City must provide City
services for the people residing in the City during the summer season. Because
of the recreational opportunities in the City, the City must also provide services

Public Consulting Team

Page 18

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

to visitors which may only temporally demand services for the short duration of
their stay in the City.

The amount of wastewater treated by the wastewater

treatment plant will increase and even doubles between July and August each
year.

From a planning perspective, the City must consider this population increase
when allocating land for recreational and seasonal housing units, providing
downtown parking spaces, providing correctly sized streets to accommodate
seasonal

increased

traffic,

adequate

water

pressure,

waste

water

transmission/treatment capacity, storm water drainage, and fire/police services.
Therefore, the estimate of this influx of seasonal population is of great importance
in the future development of the City.

There are no known methods to statistically project the number of summer
residents in the City of New Buffalo. The most accurate method to determine the
number of inhabits would be to conduct a 100% count of all residential living
units in similar fashion as done during a census. Costs of conducting a census
of this type is most often prohibitive for a small community.

A projection methodology using 1990 housing information and information about
the number of and types of boats moored in the City harbor was used to estimate
the seasonal population. The methodology for the projection uses the number of
vacant housing units classified in the 1990 census as seasonal housing units and
the number of housing units currently vacant to estimate the total housing units
estimated to be occupied on an seasonal basis. The formula and projection is as
follows:

Public Consulting Team

Page 19

�"
'
'
'
'
'
'
~
~
~
~
~
~

-~

City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Seasonal Housing Units
I. Number of seasonal housing units . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . ... 294
2. Person per household, 1990 Census .. . .. . . . .... .. .... . ... 2.44
3 . Estimated seasonal residents (line l X line 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 717
Vacant Housing Units
4 . Percentage vacant housing units , 1990 Census . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.7%
5. Excess vacant units above 5% normal vacancy rate . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 .7%
6. Estimate of seasonally occupied units
(line 5 of 1,363 housing units) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Boat Living Unit Occupancy
7. Number of Marina Slips in Harbor for .boat
with living accommodations . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650
8. Number of boats in use per International Marina Institute
occupancy studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 %
9. Number of boats occupied during season
(line 7 X line 8} . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .· , . . . . . . .. . . . .... ... 371
10. Estimate seasonal boaters in occupancy
·
(line 9 X 2.44 persons per household) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904
Estimated Total Seasonal Residents
11. Total residents (sum of lines 3, 6 and 10)

1,672

This methodology projects that 1,672 people could be classified as seasonal
occupants. This results in a total seasonal population in the City of New Buffalo
of 3,989 or an increase of 72.2% in population of the City during the summer
months. This analysis indicates the projected summer resident population to be
approximately 4,000 people during certain times in the summer season.

I
I
I
I

Public Consulting Team

Page 20

�II

'
'
'~
~
~
~
~
~
~

~

City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan • Update 1994

Selected Demographic Trend Indicators

Table 2 - Household Data
1970

Indicator
Household Count
Persons Per Household

1980

1990

905

1010

950

3.08

2.79

2.44

Table 3 - Tenure By Age of Householders
,:' •:i:: ?::::},:,:::::::

:,:'t&gt;.:c::=/':C::):&lt;':. :':':::,.;:::;::::.

•:;:;:•:::-=::

Age of'H6tiseh6lder' .

'::. ',', ,', ·,·,•, ,·,·,·,· •,•,· •..•,•:•:-:-

..

. •,•.•, .::::•:•:• :-·:::,::;:;:;:,:::::::;,: •

Owned : ; :(Rfntal .: .

';:{%,H{f94il: A.Ii

}

15 to 24 years

0

10

1.0%

25 to 34 years

59

105

16.1 %

35 to 44 years

143

22

16.2%

45 to 54 years

149

46

19.2%

55 to 64 years

129

26

15.3%

65 to 74 years

129

29

15.6%

75 years and over

113

56

16.6%

~

-I
'I

Public Consulting Team

Page 21

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Table 4 - Other Indicators

I

I

Indicator

I

New Buffalo

I

Berrien County

$30,065

$27 ,274

Housing Unit Count

1,363

69,532

Vacant Housing Units

119
8.7%

8,507
12.2%

294
21 .6%

4,448

19.5
Minutes

17.4
Minutes

5.6% Census
6.4% MESC

7 .3% Census 7.4%

Average Household Income (1989)

Seasonal Housing Units
Journey to Work Travel Time
1990 Unemployment

6.4%

MESC

Table 5 - Age by Sex and Total Population
Age Grouping

I

I
I
I

.·:•:•·•:

'
Females

X

.

.

· Total ·.

.. Males

:::::::::.:

;:•

\) •· .. Peicent Totat

'/

0 to 5 years

72

79

151

6.5%

6 to 9 years

73

65

138

6.0%

10 to 14 years

70

107

177

7.6%

15 to 19 years

81

78

159

6.9%

20 to 24 years

63

62

125

5.4%

25 to 34 years

161

195

356

15.4%

35 to 44 years

168

150

318

13.7%

45 to 54 years

137

117

254

11.0%

55 to 62 years

100

100

200

8.6%

62 to 74 years

172

116

288

12.4%

75 and above

92

59

151

6.5%

1189

1128

2317

100.0%

Total

Public Consulting Team

Page 22

�City of New Buffalo, 1Wichigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Findings and Conclusions Based On Population Trends
Analysis of the above information indicates several significant trends influencing
the future of the City of New Buffalo. These are summarized as follows:
1.

While the projections for the population growth of the City have
historically indicated a population growth, the actual resulting
counts for each of the census periods indicate the City has not met
the projected population count.

2.

Between 1980 and 1990 the City lost approximately 500 residents.

3.

The current population projections indicate the City will grow by
500 residents between 1990 and the year 2010 returning the
population to the 1980 count.

4.

Of the total households in the City, 32.2 % are headed by persons
at or above the 62 year old retirement age and 17. 8 % by someone
of 35 years or less.

5.

Households headed by person 35 years old and younger equal
17 .15 % of the total households in the City.

6.

On April 1, 1990, 8.7% of all housing units were vacant.
Normally, a 5 % vacancy rate is considered acceptable for a
community.

7.

Of all housing units, 21. 6 % were reported to be seasonally
occupied.

8.

Residents of the City work close to home with the average trip to
work of 19.5 minutes compared to 17.4 minutes for the county.
This indicates that more people from New Buffalo are going
somewhere else to work. A majority of the residents work within
an area described as beginning from south St. Joseph, and Galien
in Michigan; and ending in LaPorte and Michigan City in Indiana.

I
I
I

Public Consulting Team

Page 23

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

9.

Of the total population, 18. 9 % are over the age of 62 years and
20.1 % under the age of 15 years. This indicates a balance of
older and younger residents in the City.

10.

During the summer season, the resident population increases as
much as 73 % resulting in a resident population estimated to reach
almost 4,000 people. This estimate does not include consideration
visitors to the City.

11.

Unemployment in 1990, as documented by the Census and
Michigan Employment Security Commission indicates that
unemployment in New Buffalo is rather low, slightly below the
between the 6 to 7 percent rate recorded for the County.

Summary

The population analysis indicates that the City of New Buffalo is similar to many
smaller cities in Michigan with a mix of older and younger residents who
commute to jobs within a short distance of their homes. The estimate of the
summer and weekender population estimates indicate the small town atmosphere
is effected by the influx, estimated to be nearly a 100% increase in population of
recreational and seasonal residents.

I
I

Public Consulting Team

Page 24

�-J

City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

SECTION FIVE

J

'

~
~
~
~

EXISTING LAND USE
Land Use Survey
During the first two weeks in June 1993, a windshield survey of all properties in
the City was conducted to identify the characteristics and location of all land uses
in the City. The purpose of this survey is to record the observed present land and
building usage . The information was color coded onto a City base map; a copy
which is on display in the City Council Chambers.

Existing Land Use Tabulations

~

Information gathered in the survey indicates that a majority of the City is and has

~

General Plan. The only significant change which is noticeable, is the transition

~

retail and office uses. The other major finding is the amount of vacant land area

-I
I
I
I

remained residential in nature from the information recorded in the original

of residential housing units located along the edges of the commercial areas into

within the City which has remained despite planned rights-of-way. Based on the
generalized inventory of existing land uses, it is estimated that almost 38 % of the
City remains undeveloped. Residential land usage occupies 58.7 % of the land
area and commercial 1. 2 %. Industrial usage is almost non existent.

Public Consulting Team

Page 25

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Table 6 - Existing Land Use Tabulations
EXISfING LAND USES

CITY OF NEW BUFFALO, MICHIGAN
June 1993

Percent
Total Area

Percent Total Area
Chesterton, Ind .
Comparison Community

Single Family Residential

58.70

56.0

Multi-Family Residential

1.00

24.0

Commercial Retail and Office

1.20

4.0

Industrial

0.04

1.0

Schools, Churches and Public Buildings

0.07

15.0

Marina and Waterfront

1.00

0.0

38 .00

0.0

100.01

100.01 %

Land Use

Vacant
Total

As shown by these percentages, the City of New Buffalo is a residential
community with little industrial development. The distribution of land uses is
consistent with the forecast of development projected by the 1968 General Plan
for the City.

It is apparent that the City has adhered well to the planning

concepts set forth in the General Plan and is successful in achieving the type of
development envisioned 25 years ago.

Industrial is the only land use category where no development has occurred.
There may be several factors for the lack of industrial development including the
close proximity to the State of Indiana, the lack of intense desire for certain types

I
I
I
I

of industrial development by City residents and the lack of municipal utilities

Public Consulting Team

Page 26

�'
'
'
'
'
'

City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

(water and sewer) to prospective sites. The reconsideration of a new land use
plan provides the opportunity for recommending changes to the future land use
plans and policies of the City of New Buffalo .

~
~
~

-I
I
I
I

Public Consulting Team

Page 27

�NORTH

LEGEND

~GEOMARK :.
GEOGRAPHIC

INFORMATION
AN

AFFILIATE

SYSTEMS

OF

~LANDMARK

0

::.,es1!:..s.:ig~
~1:r,
616-1127-3383 FAX 611Hl27--4

CITY OF NEW BUFFALO
EXISTING LANDUSE
BERRIEN COUNTY, MICHIGAN

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Pla11 - Update 1994

SECTION SIX

LAND USE PLAN
Summary of Current Plan

The General Plan of 1968, established eleven categories of land uses in the land
use plan for the City and the overall planning area. Of the 7,840 acres within the
planing area shown in the following plan map, 1,287 acres or 16.5 % was
scheduled for residential development, 166 acres or 2.1 % acres scheduled for
commercial development,

182 acres or 2.3 % scheduled for industrial

development, 3,747 acres left in planned open space or in agricultural use
amounting to 47. 8 % of the total land area and the remainder 31. 3 % allocated for
rights-of-way, and other public purposes including 24.5 acres for a marina service
use classification.

Public Consulting Team

Page 29

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - UpdaJe 1994

Figure S - 1968 Land Use Plan

GfNUAllllD lANO UH ru,N

NEW BUFFALO, MICHIGAN

~

.

(,

,I

.. tO"l.l•Ol"'ll Ulll tl)l .. 11&amp;1

~

c.1 .. 1••1co .... 1,c••1

G1]

.. , 1G-.10u,oooco--1•c1•1

UiiJ

'

&lt;l"'IUIIUllNIUCWSll l(. 1 -

.,

.......... "''"9&lt;1-

~
~

, i

I

r - - _; ' ·.,

, /,'
I.

I

r

~

~,,,.u,_.,

~

("'""""

•

U ,IO(Nt&amp;I l(NOOI

ti

l

.

- ~~ .

~·/1
,

:\
.

.,•u

...-00•1 ..

I

I

I

,.

r ...,,,-·u'Tu

, '

.

-

, ,..,.

I

~

· ••

~

I

\

/

!
j

:

\...:1
~/'

/

:o.u:::~-;

1 ··•~I. . CtUelNG • ..., '"";..'..

"

;

/ :__

I

I

·n
!

..

~

.

[

I

.. -_ _

Public Consulling Team

Page 30

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

Land Use Plan - 1994
The land use plan shown on the previous page is based on the land use plan
shown in the General Plan, developed in 1968 and updated to reflect current
conditions within the City of New Buffalo and the planning area.

The most

significant changes to the plan are identification of transition zones where existing
land uses are trending to higher land uses such as commercial and office uses.
Additionally, regulated lands are illustrated in the plan as they require special
consideration if chosen for development.

The future land use map of the City shows the logical extension of residential
development surrounding the more densely populated portions of the City, as well
as portions of land areas surrounding the City. The conversion of lands once
considered for industrial development to residential uses is also indicated since
the demand for industrial land has diminished within the City boundary.

The plan is based on certain land development planning assumptions and
guidelines including:
1.

PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES

Municipal services will be extended in increments necessary to
accommodate the logical extension of development from existing utility
service locations.

2.

MUNICIPAL ASSISTANCE TO
DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE

FUND

NEW

The City will aid the development of vacant land areas within the by
assisting private developers with financing of street improvement with in
designated rights-of-way or in alternative rights-of-way approved by the
Planning Commission and the City Council.

Public Consulting Team

Page 31

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update J994

3.

ANNEXATION OF CITY SERVICED LAND AREA

Land in the Planning Area to be serviced by municipal utilities shall be
incorporated into the City and recognized in the General Plan.

4.

COMPLIANCE WITH LAND REGULATIONS

Regulated lands shall be designated and all regulations respected in the
context of all future development patterns proposed for land uses.
5.

CITY COST IMPACT OF NEW DEVELOPMENT

All development proposals for land use shall seek to minimize the
development and maintenance expenses of the City .
6.

PRESERVATION OF APPEARANCE

The beauty, visual appearance and historic characteristics of the City shall
be, to the extent possible, preserved.
The proposed revised land use plan indicates a number of changes from the land
use plan presented in the General Plan. These are summarized in the following
paragraphs.

Additional retail and commercial development areas are proposed for lands
surrounding the Downtown Central Business District and along Buffalo and
Whittaker Streets to the edge of the City limits. Provision is made for the logical
extension of the downtown area into adjacent residential areas, especially along
the highway and street frontage . Additional commercial transition into residential
uses is indicated for the area south of Whittaker Street between the marina district
and Buffalo Street.

Public Consulting Team

Page 32

�J
J

,
J
,

City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update /994

A larger, more dominate highway retail &amp; office area is designated for the area
surrounding the Round House . The intent is to provide a sufficiently large land
area within the City , to allow development of Interstate related commercial and
locally based commercial activities.

Whittaker Street is the Main Interstate

entrance to New Buffalo and provides a visitor their first impression of the City.
Providing sufficient land for the development of a commercial area serving
travelers as well as residents will give the City an opportunity to seek
improvements in the visual appearance of the entry to the City.

An area for industrial development is proposed, although considerably smaller in
size that proposed in the original General Plan. The area located between the
railroad tracks and Madison Street is proposed for this use designation.

It is

envisioned that "light" industries and other non-retail commercial developments
could be attracted to this area in a development pattern having high visual
qualities and appearance.

Residential development areas are proposed for lands to the east of the railroad
tracks. This area is only partially served by municipal utilities . It has unique
natural features including wetland areas and natural tree cover which would
enhance the attractiveness of the area for residential development.

The land use map indicates the land uses suggested for the future. It does not
affect the use of land in these areas immediately since this can only be done
through a zoning change. The suggested changes to the land use plan will, in
part, be incorporated into the update process for the zoning ordinance expected

J.

Public Consulting Team

Page 33

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

to be completed in concert with the preparation of the General Plan - Update
1994.

The remaining portions of the City is recommended for low density residential
development.

Low density development includes single family homes on

individual lots in the City.

Additionally , multi-family duplex living units on

somewhat larger lots is suggested as an alternative to the traditional single family
living unit.

Additional multi-family housing units are not suggested for inclusion at this time
since vacant land for this type of housing is currently unavailable. The most
logical location of additional multi-family housing will be expansions to existing
zoned areas.

It is recognized that additional multi-family housing will likely be proposed into
the City. The plan, while currently not designating additional land for multifamily housing, can be amended by the Planning Commission to include a
location proposed by a developer if found to be consistent with the General Plan
and the City Zoning Ordinance and deemed to be in the best interest of the City.

The proposed land uses contained on the land use plan is a guide and not intended
to indicate precise boundaries between uses. These uses could vary, depending
on how a specific proposal relates to existing uses and to the plan. However, the
plan allows the City to grow and expand in a controlled manner that reflects the
wishes and desires of the entire community . The City will give fair consideration

Public Consulting Team

Page 34

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update 1994

to proposals for land development that vary from the plan. If the proposal will
enhance the City, the City may amend the plan map to approve the proposed use.

Public Consulting Team

Page 35

�NORTH

•
LEGEND
--------

=
5

Sllt6I.E FNIIIY RESIDElfflN.
IJUUI-FIMIIY R£SIDElff/N.

CEJffRJL BJSMESS D/STRl:f

H161Nfll RUNL OFFK:£

;
- : ; COIIIJE/fCIN.WNf£HWSIJIG t /lilllSTRIN..
PIRICS Ir BEJCHES
IIMJ/tA
....____. RJSHr-&lt;JFJ/111
-

~ GEOMARK :.
QEOQRAPHIC

INFORMATION
AN

Al""P' ILI ATE

SYSTEMS

015"

~LANDMARK

=.=~

061
~

0
~~1

61&amp;-lr.!Hl383 FAX 61&amp;-e27-361W

-

CITY OF NEW BUFFALO
FUTURE LANDLJSE PLAN
BERRIEN COUNTY, MICHIGAN

�City of New Buffalo, Michigan
General Plan - Update /994

INDEX

appearance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11, 32, 33
central business district . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5, 11, 32
commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8, 10, 11, 25, 26, 29, 31-33
commission

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2

council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2, 5-7, 25, 31
development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5, 7-11, 13, 15, 16, 19, 26, 29, 31-34
drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9, 19
economic development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
floodplain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
general plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1, 5-7, 13, 15, 17, 25, 26, 29, 31-34
goal

............................................ 7

industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8, 25, 26, 29, 31, 33
land use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5, 7, 8, 15, 25-34, 36
office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8, 9, 25, 26, 31, 33
policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-12
population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5, 11, 17-20, 22-24
sewer

...... ..................................... 9

storm water . . .

9, 19

transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5, 10
utilities .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8, 9, 32, 33
wetland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15, 33
zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5, 33, 34

Public Consulting Team

Page 37

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009510">
                <text>New-Buffalo_General-Plan-Update_1994</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009511">
                <text>City of New Buffalo Planning Commission, City of New Buffalo, Berrien County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009512">
                <text>1994-09-20</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009513">
                <text>General Plan-Update 1994</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009514">
                <text>The General Plan-Update 1994 for the City of New Buffalo was prepared by the City of New Buffalo Planning Commission with the assistance of Charles R. Eckenstahler-Planning Consultant and was endorsed by the City Council on September 20, 1994.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009515">
                <text>Charles R. Eckenstahler-Planning Consultant (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009516">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009517">
                <text>New Buffalo (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009518">
                <text>Berrien County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009519">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009521">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009522">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009523">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009524">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038403">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54795" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59065">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/1b38ae7ce76202919b6ce3ad1f5a6cae.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b18868610b01342d9e3de4470bbfeb47</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1009787">
                    <text>PONTL\C '.2010 A ~'E\V REALIT1.·

A Comprehensive Plan for the
City of Pontiac. i\lichigan

�FRO M THE LIBRARY OF
Pl ann:n6 B&lt; Z::.,1:nJ Center; Inc~

PONTIAC 2010 A NEW REALITY
A Comprehensive Plan for the
City of Pontiac, Michigan

City of Pontiac Planning Commission

The development of this Plan was made
possible through funding from the:

•
•
•

l..·

Economic Development Division,
Oakland County, MI.
Tax Increment Finance Authority,
Pontiac, MI.
Community Development Block Grant
Program, Pontiac, MI.

�CITY OF PONTIAC, MICHIGAN
Wallace E. Holland, Mayor

PLANNING COMMISSION
Robert English, Chairperson
James McMillan, Vice Chairperson
Sharon Brooks
Nicholas Dinkins
Alice Griffin
Jules Lavalais
Jean Milton, Past Vice Chairperson
Dorothy Quince
Daniel Rath

OFFICE OF LAND USE AND STRATEGIC PLANNING
Owen E. Winnie, A.I.C.P., P.C.P., Administrator
Richard Hahn, A.I.C.P. , P.C.P., Planner III
Larry Lewis, Planner III (deceased)
Douglas Borisen, Graphics Coordinator
Maryann Burnett, Secretary

CITY COUNCIL
John P. Bueno, District 3, President
Everett Seay, District 7, President Pro-Tern
W. Campanella Russell, District 1
Peter V. Tenuta, District 2
Michael E. Willis, District 4
Clarence Phillips, District 5
Tracy A. Miller Sr., District 6

PLANNING CONSULTANT
Robert K Swarthout, Incorporated
2151 Livernois, Suite 320
Troy, Michigan 48083
400 South Dixie Highway, Suite 121
Boca Raton , Florida 33432

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Chapter 1
RESIDENTIAL AREA LAND USE POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ....................................................................................... 1.1
Chapter2
OFFICE, RETAIL and OTHER
COMMERCIAL AREA LAND USE POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ....................................................................................... 2.1
Chapter3
URBAN DESIGN POLICIES for THOROUGHFARES
with Related Data and Analyses ....................................................................................... 3.1
Chapter4
INDUSTRIAL LAND USE POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ....................................................................................... 4.1
Chapter5
THOROUGHFARE and TRANSIT POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ....................................................................................... 5.1
Chapter6
PARK and RECREATION POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ....................................................................................... 6.1
Chapter 7
PONTIAC CIVIC CENTER ANALYSIS and
PRELIMINARY OPTIONS and CONCLUSIONS .............................................................. 7.1
Chapter8
GROWTH ENHANCEMENT POLICIES
and DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL REPORT
A Summary of Findings with Pertinent Policies ............................................................ 8.1
Chapter9
HIGHWOOD and SILVERDOME INDUSTRIAL PARKS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ....................................................................................... 9.1
Chapter 10
SILVERDOME STADIUM SITE LAND USE and
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ..................................................................................... 10.1
Chapter 11
HISTORIC PONTIAC
A Personal Architectural View by Edward D. Francis, F .A.I.A. ................................. 11.1

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Chapter 12
CLINTON VALLEY SITE LAND USE and
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ..................................................................................... 12.1
Chapter 13
DOWNTOWN LAND USE, URBAN DESIGN and
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
with Related Data and Analyses ..................................................................................... 13.l
Chapter 14
FUTURE LAND USE MAP and MAP POLICIES
with Related Explanations ............................................................................................... 14.l

~

~
~

~
~

~
~

~
~

\

~
~
~

~
~
~

�Chapter 1
RESIDENTIAL AREA LAND USE POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses

INTRODUCTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Following this introduction, the chapter is organized into two main sections entitled "Residential
Policies" and "Backgrowid Information."
The residential policies are grouped into seven residential policy clusters. Each residential policy is
stated as the topic sentence of a paragraph. The balance of the paragraph contains data and
analyses which are related to the policy. The seven policy clusters are as follows:
Cluster 1: Encourage New Residential Development
Cluster 2: Protect Existing Residential Development
Cluster 3: Help Meet Housing Assistance Needs of Low Income Residents
Cluster 4: Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies and
Priorities
Cluster 5: Policies for Specific Sites and Sub-Areas in Residential Planning Area 1
Cluster 6: Policies for Specific Sites and Sub-Areas in Residential Planning Area 2
Cluster 7: Policies for Specific Sites and Sub-Areas in Residential Planning Area 3
Residential Policy Cluster 4 is particularly important. It calls upon the City of Pontiac to prioritize
its neighborhood improvement efforts based on one of five strategies which are detailed in individual
Cluster 4 policy statements. Clusters 5, 6 and 7 provide policies which are particularly applicable to
concentrating improvement efforts on Residential Planning Areas 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Clusters 5,
6 and 7 also contain policies which could well be applied city-wide whether or not revitalization
efforts are to be focused on the Residential Planning Area with which they are associated.
The "Background Information" section contains two important analytical maps and related
explanatory material. The two maps are entitled "Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and
Rehabilitation Areas" and Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies
and Priorities." The first of theses two maps synthesizes a good deal of data about the character of
the city's residential areas. The second map sets forth areas where five different revitalization
policies might be appropriate. Although it contains policy recommendations, this map is considered
background information rather than a policy document per se because it would be impossible to fully
implement its policy suggestions within the city's resource limits. The additional priority setting
called for in Policy Cluster 4 is required.
Chapter 14 of this plan contains additional residential land use policies . The policies in Chapter 14
relate particularly to the Future Land Use Map.

Page 1.1

�RESIDENTIAL POLICY C L U S T E R S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Residential Policy Cluster 1:
ENCOURAGE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
The city should set its sights on good quality single-family housing by tapping the private
market potential which is within its reach. The primary thrust of this plan is to encourage new
homes in the upper ranges of moderately priced units. The objective is to provide housing
opportunities for the middle income population. A housing market study was conducted during the
early stages of the preparation of this plan. The market study reported that new houses of 1,500
square feet on 65 foot lots could be delivered in Pontiac for between 15 and 20 percent less than the
same size home and lot in Waterford or Auburn Hills. The study also pointed out ... "there are
relatively few existing opportunities for large lot residential development in the city. While 8,000 to
9,000 square feet (say 70 feet x 130 feet) may be common in suburban areas, they are an exception in
the City of Pontiac. Consideration should be given to the platting and development of a large lot
subdivision by a public or quasi public body. The finished lots could be made available to custom
home builders, initially at less than market prices." The new Land Use Plan has identified a
corridor, primarily north of Walton Boulevard, with a small pocket just south of Galloway Lake, for
residential use at five units per net acre. This area contains a considerable amount of vacant
acreage parcels and affords the city the best opportunity in which to achieve this goal.

Aggressive code enforcement efforts are needed in order to stimulate new housing
construction as well as to protect existing housing resources. The existing housing stock must
be protected from further decline not just for its own sake but in order to stimulate new construction.
Past declines in maintenance standards for the existing housing stock has be a serious damper for
new housing construction. Continued decline will be a serious damper for future new housing.
Specific policies which the city should pursue in order to protect its existing housing stock are listed
below and explained in detail in Residential Policy Cluster 2.

The city should enact and vigorously enforce an inspection-on-sale program for all housing
units, particularly owner-occupied units.

1

An "existing housing code" with somewhat lower standards than applicable to new
construction should be enacted by the city as the standard for an inspection-on-sale program.

I
l

The city should enact and vigorously enforce a periodic inspection program for all rental
housing units.
The rental inspection program should put speci~l focus on inspecting conversion rental units.
The cost of inspections can and should be fully born by inspection fees.
The city should vigorously enforce minimum standards for the upkeep of private yards.
The city should set moderately high minimum area requirements for single-family lots in
newly developed areas. Moderately large lots would give the city a single-family residential asset
that will be increasingly rare in areas with higher land costs. This plan recommends a standard of
approximately 6,200 square feet per lot for most of the city and a standard of approximately 8,700
square feet per lot in northern portions of the city.

Page 1.2

1

�The city may, at times, accept single-family attached condominium housing in lieu of
single-family detached housing. The residential market study conducted during preparation of
this plan noted that the potential for new attached condominium housing is stronger than the
detached single family potential. Two- and three-bedroom units ranging from 1,000 to 1,200 square
feet can probably be delivered for five to 30 percent less than new low-priced starter single-family
homes. Condominium associations offer assurance that maintenance standards will be uniform and
acceptable to potential buyers. Quadraplex clusters or townhouse-type units are most likely to be
desired. Stacked flat and apartment-type condominium projects are not likely to be successful.

The city should be willing, as a matter ofpolicy, to make all required off-site infrastructure
improvements necessary to realize new housing construction potential. The housing market
in Pontiac is not strong enough to support off-site infrastructure improvements. New private market
housing will not develop unless the city makes any necessary off-site infrastructure improvements.
This policy commitment is intended as a commitment in principal, not a binding pledge. It is
intended that the city weigh all relevant facts before committing to any specific off-site
improvements to facilitate a particular housing project. The Pontiac Community Development
Department believes that consideration should be given to using tax increment financing revenues
for such infrastructure improvements, where eligible.

The city should concentrate infrastructure improvements meant to stimulate new private
market housing in carefully selected areas. Individual infrastructure expenditures designed to
stimulate new housing should be coordinated with each other and should be coordinated with
comprehensive neighborhood improvement strategies. Residential infrastructure expenditures could
be concentrated north of Walton Boulevard where there are many prime locations for new owneroccupied development. Residential infrastructure expenditures could also be concentrated in key
revitalization areas; vacant and redevelopment sites near Crystal Lake offer strong potential.
The city should use Michigan's Blighted Areas Act to facilitate better land configurations
for residential development. There are a number of parcels in the city which, if combined with
neighboring parcels, would create larger tracts better able to accommodate desirable, market rate
housing. Michigan's blighted areas act provides municipalities with the authority to condemn,
acquire and rep lat such vacant land and then put it on the market for private development.

The city should resist the development of less desirable uses on or near sites that have
strong potential for owner-occupied residential development. Mobile home development and
non-residential development should be resisted on prime single-family sites. In particular, mobile
home and non-residential development should be avoided on the residential sites this plan
designates north of Walton Boulevard. Such development should also be avoided on the residential
sites near Crystal Lake and other desirable lakes.
The city must use moral persuasion and information plus whatever economic clout it has
to encourage lenders to appraise new housing based on comparable new housing sales
rather than on older housing sales. New residential construction simply will not occur unless
lending provides a reasonable proportion of the financing. As of 1989, a new home in Pontiac
typically appraised for 25 percent below construction cost. This is partly because Pontiac is
perceived as a relatively high risk housing market. It is also because there was at that time
practically no sales of new housing. Moral persuasion should be carried out between the highest
levels of city government and bank administration. Information can be provided to banks if the city
would retain the services of an independent appraiser to monitor housing sales and report to banks

Page 1.3

�on positive as well as negative trends. The city's econormc clout includes how it allocates its own
banking business and how it can persuade others to allocate their banking business.

The city should use its influence with the school board and other relevant decision makers
to establish neighborhood schools and magnet schools as the norm in Pontiac, and to
eliminate bus sing for the purposes of racial balance. Significant new residential construction
simply will not occur unless people with the resources to exercise housing choice are more satisfied
with Pontiac schools than they or current residents have been in the past. The need for
neighborhood and magnet schools was very strongly expressed during focus group meetings with
Pontiac residents leading to the preparation of this plan. Participants in these focus groups
expressed dissatisfaction with bussing, which was perceived to have chased many desirable families ,
both black and white, out of Pontiac or at least out of Pontiac public schools. Neighborhood schools
are schools attended by people living in the immediate neighborhood. The neighborhood school
concept applies particularly to elementary schools. Magnet schools are schools which are open to
and which attract students from the entire district because they offer a specialized or otherwise
superior educational program.

The city's property tax burden should be lowered. New construction of existing housing and
private investment in older housing will be seriously retarded unless the city's property tax rate is
lowered. An 81 mill rate was in effect at the time this plan was under preparation. This rate is
greater than the market will support, in no small measure because the value received is not
perceived to justify the cost. This is particularly so with respect to schools. The city must do all that
it can to effectuate lower rates even though it is directly responsible for only about one-fourth of the
overall rate.

Infill housing is desirable when it is compatible in design and scale with the existing
neighborhood into which it is placed. Pontiac has about 2,800 vacant lots. Most prospective
home buyers will not pay new construction costs in older subdivisions. In the most desirable westside areas, compatible new homes can not be constructed for acceptable prices. Infill compatibility
can be readily achieved in an area of well-kept bungalows.
The city may, at times, accept new rental housing development in lieu of new owner
occupied housing. This policy will enable the city to take advantage of existing market realities to
attract new development. At the time this plan was prepared, the potential for new rental
development was strong and expected to remain so for the foreseeable future . W oodcrest Commons
and Bloomfield on the River have been renovated and\.eceived good market success. Their success
indicates that better-quality rental developments can be accepted in Pontiac by middle-income
households. Crystal Lake Apartments plus three north-end projects are expected to put 600 new
rental units on the market by the end of 1990. Successful rental projects will be priced under the
market of surrounding communities. Successful rental projects will be visible and accessible to
employment and/or natural amenities. About one-fourth of the rental demand will come from the
elderly. This demand can be satisfied with smaller units. Multiple-family housing development
should be given priority in areas with the least potential for owner-occupied housing.

The subdivision review process and the site plan review process should be used to help
ensure good design of both single-family and multiple-family residential development. The
subdivision ordinance should incorporate both quantitative and qualitative standards of subdivision
design; all single-family detached and two-family subdivisions should be reviewed based on those
standards. The zoning ordinance should establish quantitative and qualitative standards of site

Page 1.4

�design for single-family detached and two-family condominium developments ; all such developments
should be reviewed based on those standards. Finally, the zoning ordinance should establish
quantitative and qualitative standards for all types of multiple-family residential and nonresidential development; all such development should be reviewed based on those standards.
Qualitative standards are sometimes called discretionary standards. In Michigan law, qualitative or
discretionary site plan review standards are standards which can be determined to have been
fulfilled only by exercising discretionary judgment. Michigan law specifies that, if reasonable
discretionary judgment determines that all qualitative standards have been met and if all applicable
quantitative standards have also been met, then site plan a pproval must be granted .

Residential Policy Cluster 2:
PROTECT EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Protecting the substantial value in the city's existing housing stock is the most important
and feasible housing policy the city can pursue. It is easier to protect the value of existing
housing than to create new housing assets from scratch, at least from a long term perspective. In
the short run, new housing can be built and existing housing rehabilitated, thus creating new
housing assets. However, these assets will not be enduring unless the city is willing and able to
ensure protection of its existing housing stock with appropriate code enforcement. Value is strongest
in the west and north sides of town. A substantial number of homeowners have taken out home
improvement loans in these areas , according to the housing market study conducted while this plan
was in preparation.
The city should enact and vigorously enforce an inspection-on-sale program for all housing
units, including owner-occupied units. One of the ways to ensure maintenance of the existing
housing supply is to require every house and apartment in the city to be inspected and brought up to
code every time it changes ownership. An "inspection-on-sale" program requires periodic
reinvestment in homes at the time when equity is freed due to a sale. Thus no one who has a home
is forced out by a requirement to bring it up to code. A certificate of occupancy must be issued before
a new owner can move into or rent a property. The certificate of occupancy is given only after the
building has been inspected and found in compliance with all relevant codes. It is usual to allow
seller and buyer to negotiate who pays for bringing a house up to code. Sellers who wish top dollar
will get an inspection and make necessary repairs prior to negotiating a sales contract. They can
then be issued a certificate of occupancy good for any new owner. The certificate of occupancy can be
good for six months or a year. Prospective buyers then know that they can move in without another
inspection. Alternatively, sellers can provide prospective buyers with inspection results and
negotiate a sales price based on both parties expectations and estimates for the cost of the work. At
the same time, it increases the willingness of owners to invest the money necessary to keep their
house in reasonably good condition since it assures them that other owners in the neighborhood will
be doing the same. Inspection-on-sale programs have been successful in other cities, including
Detroit and Dearborn.

An "existing housing code" with somewhat lower standards than applicable to new
construction should be enacted by the city as the standard for an inspection-on-sale
program. Many, if not most, of the city's older housing units were originally constructed to
standards far below those applied by new construction codes. It is not feasible that these older
houses be brought up to new construction code standards. The existing housing code should include
minimal health and safety standards, standards which are less demanding than those of the city's
new construction code. The existing housing code should include appearance standards that will
ensure neat and well maintained exteriors and paved areas.

Page 1.5

�The city should enact and vigorously enforce a periodic inspectio_n program for all rental
housing units. Past efforts have been inadequate to prevent substant:ial deterioration in the rental
housing stock. Therefore, it will be necessary to vas tly expand the scope of past rental inspection
efforts . Every rental unit should be immediately identified by a survey of building permits, utility
records and field conditions. Then every rental unit should be inspected each year. That means
more inspectors will have to be hired. The cost of these inspectors can and should be fully born by
inspection and/or rental housing licensing fees. Fees should be kept in a special ear-marked account,
not in the general fund. The general fund should provide seed money to get the rental inspection
program started.
The rental inspection program should put special focus on inspecting conversion rental
units. Conversion of single-family structures to multiple-family structures has produced serious
housing problems. Many conversion units are way below current code standards and only
marginally suitable to living requirements. They often receive inadequate ongoing maintenance
which results in accelerated deterioration. Deterioration and overcrowding ultimately results in
neighborhood decline. Therefore, it is particularly important that conversion rental units be
identified and incorporated in a rental inspection program. A systematic field survey may be needed.
Individuals, block clubs and community organizations should encourage residents to report
conversion units. Building permit and utility records should be periodically checked to identify
unauthorized conversions. Any change to an existing building which increases the number of
residential units should be subject to special scrutiny to ensure that minimum housing standards are
met. Something like the Federal Housing Administration's Minimum Property Standards, no longer
thought necessary for Federal housing insurance programs , may be very necessary and appropriate
for City of Pontiac rental units. The availability of large old homes in areas which are not desirable
for single-family housing is a factor which stimulates conversion. Conversion is most prevalent in
the two blocks around Wide Track Drive. Residential Areas 2 and 3 are where most conversion and
rental unit maintenance problems exist.

The cost of inspections can and should be fully born by inspection fees. It is not feasible to
finance an inspection on sale program from the general fund. Nor is it possible to operate an
inspection on sale program unless the proceeds of inspections are earmarked to cover all costs,
including municipal overhead costs directly attributable to the program. A separate account should
be established for on-sale inspection income and costs and periodic inspection income and costs. In
no instance should inspection income be mingled with the general fund.

The city should vigorously enforce minimum stanrt,ards for the upkeep of private yards.
Yard debris and inoperative motor vehicles should bring a violation ticket to the owners and/or
occupants of offending property.

The city should establish a cooperative working relationship with landlords. Over 4,000 of
the city's single-family housing units are rental properties. This represents high percentage of the
city's entire housing stock. There is no way that the city can be a well maintained, desirable place to
live if rental properties are not well maintained. One type of cooperative effort is the Pontiac
Community Development Department's on-going program to facilitate rental housing upgrade by
providing landlords with rehabilitation loan guarantees funded through the Community
Development Block Grant. This program puts the city at risk to the extent of 50 percent of a loan,
but leaves the landlord and bank both at risk to the extent of 25 percent each. Landlord and bank
risk is necessary to ensure that sound rehabilitation investments are made. Other opportunities for
the city to cooperate with landlords should be initiated when opportunities are identified.

Page 1.6

'I
I

'I
II

�The city should concentrate its rehabilitation assistance efforts _if they are to be fruitful. If
this is not done, then the city's rehabilitation efforts will not stimulate the private investment so
essential if Pontiac as a whole is to be revitalized. City government does not have the assets
necessary to correct all housing and neighborhood deterioration . It never will. No outside assistance
in adequate proportions will ever be available.
In concentrating its rehabilitation efforts, the city must carefully select the areas where
the efforts will bear the most fruit. All areas of the city are not equally likely to benefit from
rehabilitation efforts. The quality of original construction varies throughout the city; the houses in
some neighborhoods were built better than those in others. The extent of housing deterioration also
varies throughout the city; more houses have deteriorated more severely in some neighborhoods than
in others. The presence of neighborhood assets such as parks and desirable non-residential land
uses varies from neighborhood to neighborhood. The ability of municipal government to improve
neighborhood circumstances by augmenting positives and eliminating or reducing negatives varies
from neighborhood to neighborhood. Finally, the city does not have nearly enough resources to
correct all housing and neighborhood deficiencies. For all of these reasons, it is absolutely necessary
that the city concentrate its rehabilitation assistance efforts in neighborhoods where they can be
most effective.
The Pontiac Community Development Department should, in consultation with the Mayor
and City Council, select a strategy for concentrating rehabilitation and code enforcement
efforts. Potentially effective strategies are diagrammed in the map entitled "Neighborhood
Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies and Priorities" and the explanatory text
that goes with it. The strategies set forth in this map were based on the analysis summarized on the
map entitled "Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Areas." This map and
the explanatory text related to it can be consulted for further explanation of the recommended
rehabilitation and code enforcement strategies.

Federal Community Development Block Grant funds received by Pontiac should be used
exclusively for residential and business rehabilitation and other vital neighborhood
revitalization activities rather than distributed to sub recipients. The city has very limited
Block Grant allocations. The 1989 allocation was 1.4 million dollars; subsequent years will be less.
Concentration of Block Grant dollars for revitalization is necessary in order to help ensure their
effectiveness. Distribution of Block Grant dollars among eligible but diverse activities will dissipate
their impact.
In some, but not all cases, large old homes should be converted to serve multiple-family
residential use or non-residential uses. Many of the city's large old homes are located in the
Seminole Hills subdivision and on local residential streets which are part of the Franklin Boulevard
Historic District. These large old homes should be retained for single-family use because the
introduction of multiple-family residential use in these areas would be detrimental. Some of the
city's large old homes are located in the Fairgrove Historic District. Most of these have already been
converted to multiple-residential use. This multiple-residential pattern may already be too well
established to alter. Zoning regulations in the Fairgrove Historic District could allow two- or threefamily use, but with high minimum unit size requirements to help ensure good quality units that are
consistent with the objective of preserving the historic quality of the district. Other large old homes
are located on major thoroughfares and in neighborhoods which are not sufficiently desirable to
support single-family residential uses in large structures which are costly to maintain and operate.
It is not feasible to require single-family use of these structures. Two-family or three-family
residential uses or even non-residential uses could be permitted in some of these locations. However,

Page 1.7

�such use should be subject to carefully tailored regulation which protect the architectural integrity of
the buildings themselves and the areas in which they are located. Site.design controls should ensure
that adequate parking is provided, but not in front yards. Front yard parking should be prohibited
because it is aesthetically incompatible with the overall architectural integrity of the site and
building. When rear yard parking space is limited, uses should be limited to those which generate
minimum parking demand.

The intrusion of strip non-residential uses into residential areas should be avoided. The
intrusion of strip non-residential uses into residential areas adjoining to the rear is undesirable and
should almost never be permitted. Such intrusion usually manifests itself by construction of parking
lots on formerly residential lots. In Pontiac, the need to expand strip commercial properties can
usually be accomplished on adjacent sites fronting on the same thoroughfare as the use being
expanded rather than on adjacent sites to the rear which front on a local residential street. On rare
occasions intrusion of non-residential uses into residential areas may be necessary in order to
accommodate the expansion of uniquely important employment and tax base assets. Then it should
be permitted but regulated to minimize negative impacts.
Residential uses should be appropriately screened from the non-residential uses. There are
many areas where residential and non-residential uses abut each other or lie across the street from
each other. Screening should be ensured by strong screening and buffering requirements in the
Pontiac zoning ordinance. Figures 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 are conceptual illustrations of desirable screening
possibilities. They are provided as examples, not as specific recommendations to be incorporated
exactly as shown into the zoning ordinance. In addition to property line screening, trash receptacles
and outdoor storage areas should be screened and kept neat. It should be possible to incorporate
some maintenance and possibly screening requirements in a general ordinance from which no
grandfather privileges would be available rather than in a zoning regulation from which grandfather
privileges would be available.

\

Page 1.8
--

-

-

--

---

----

-

�Figure 1.1
SCREENING OF RESIDENTIAL USES FROM LARGE-LOT,
LOW AND MEDIUM INTENSITY NON-RESIDENTIAL USES

·----~ ·-··A·-·-·-·-·-·-

PLAN OPTION 2

4

~

~

ELEVATION from RESIDENTIAL SIDE
KEY:
1. PAVED and STRIPED PARKING.
2. CONTINUOUS CURB.

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

ADEQUATE OVERHANG DISTANCE; MAY BE GRAVEL or PAVED.
FIVE FOOT HIGH MASONRY SCREEN WALL.
CONSTRUCTION DISTANCE if NEEDED.
PROPERTY LINE
SUGAR MAPLE (ten year height 23 feet; mature height 120 feet) or
SIMILAR SPECIES.

Page 1.9

�Figure 1.2
SCREENING OF RESIDENTIAL USES FROM SMALL-LOT,
LOW INTENSITY NON-RESIDENTIAL USES

.-:.-.·.-:.-:.-:.-.·.-:.·:.·.1

·::,:.:-:-:-:-:-:-:•:-:·:-:-:-:·: i
:-:·:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: i
·:-:·:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:·:-:-:\

::/\::::::::::::::::···::::::::::::\::::::::\::::::\:::::::::&gt;l
...........

·.-:.-:::::::::::::.-:.-::, j
I
I

ELEVATION from RESIDENTIAL SIDE
KEY:

NOTE:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

REAR YARD LANDSCAPING PROVIDED ON
RESIDENTIAL SIDE. NO LANDSCAPING
REQUIRED IN REAR YARD OF NON-RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY BECAUSE OF SMALL LOT SIZE AND
REQUIREMENT THAT BUILDING DESIGN
CONFORM TO NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN
STANDARDS.

PAVED and STRIPED PARKING.
CONTINUOUS CURB.
ADEQUATE OVERHANG DISTANCE.
AVE FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALL
CONSTRUCTION DISTANCE if NEEDED.
PROPERTY LINE.
LANDSCAPED FRONT YARD.

Page 1.10

�Figure 1.3
SCREENING OF RESIDENTIAL USES FROM LARGE-LOT,
HIGH INTENSITY NON-RESIDENTIAL USES

SECTION

80 feet

,: d '. ~,
"~! .. ·'ml!~V'.'IPl,'

. ~~- .

,.

ELEVATION from RESIDENTIAL SIDE
KEY:
1. BERM.
2. DOUBLE ROW of CANADA HEMLOCK, AMERICAN ARBORVITAE
or SIMILAR SPECIES SPACED to CREATE CONTINUOUS SCREEN.
3. SUGAR MAPLE (ten year height 23 feet; mature height 120 feet) or
SIMILAR SPECIES.
4. WELL MAINTAINED LAWN on ALL AREAS VISIBLE from RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY or PUBLIC RIGHTS-of-WAY and NOT OTHERWISE
LANDSCAPED.
5. OTHER LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.

Pagel.11

�Residential Policy Cluster 3:
_
HELP MEET HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS of LOW INCOME RESIDENTS
City housing policy should be responsive to the housing needs of low and very low income
households, but city housing policy should be primarily guided by a firm determination to
make Pontiac a desirable place to own property for those households and businesses which
can afford to pay property and other taxes necessary to support reasonable municipal
services. Within Pontiac, the housing needs of a very large number of low and very low income
households are met, but it will not be possible for the city to meet all the needs of such households.
Attempts to do so through direct subsidy are obviously out of the question. Attempts to do so by
relaxing property upkeep requirements are likely to discourage investment in property by those who
can afford to keep it up and pay the taxes necessary to support reasonable municipal services. The
following facts are relevant to this policy:
A substantial proportion of the population of the City of Pontiac is unable to compete
effectively in the market for new housing because of their low incomes. Nearly 54 percent of
all households in Pontiac are classified as "Lower Income," i.e. having an adjusted household
income of less than 80 percent of the area median income for a family of three. About 60
percent of the lower income households are classified as ''Very Low Income," i.e. an income
less than half of the area median. While not all lower income households are inadequately
housed, a substantial proportion of them are, primarily as a result of their limited ability to
pay for standard housing.
In 1980, of the lower income households in the City of Pontiac, some 32 percent (4,358) were
categorized as having housing need. State wide, close to 39 percent of the lower income
households were reported to be in need, so Pontiac households were somewhat more likely to
be adequately housed.
The city has seven percent of Oakland County's population, but 30 percent of its subsidized
housing. There are approximately 3,600 assisted housing units in the city; these units
amount to nearly 20 percent of the total number of units in the city.
Since 1980, there has been an increase in total housing need in Pontiac. Also, the proportion
of all lower income households with housing need has increased by 13 percent. In the short
term future , it is anticipated that similar conditions will prevail.
Since Pontiac has less than 13 percent of the lower income housing need in Oakland County,
city residents are considerably more likely to be able to obtain a subsidized unit than their
suburban counterparts. The number of new assisted housing units added to the supply in
Pontiac since 1980 is approximately equal to t\ie absolute increase in need during the same
period. Nevertheless, over the next five years, Pontiac will have to add an average of more
than 80 subsidized units a year to maintain the same record of improvement.
The rental inspection programs could have a negative impact on the lowest-income
households because they will reduce the supply of the cheapest housing. It is desirable that
the city seek to provide housing assistance for those households which will have their
housing choices reduced by the program. However, it will not be possible for Pontiac to
provide alternative housing for all of the very low-income households that may be affected by
the rental inspection program or may otherwise need assistance.

Page 1.12
-

-

-

-

--

�Trends in Housing Need

1980
Households

1988
Households

1993
Households

12,017

13,271

14,121

Total in Need
Percent

4,358
36.2

4,927
37.1

5,352
37.9

Elderly
Small Family
Large Family

1,986
2,061
311

2,202
2,379
346

2,420
2,574
358

Total Lower Income

Source: Development Research Associates, Incorporated

In allocating limited resources to meet the housing assistance needs of low income
households, substantial emphasis should be given to the needs of the low income elderly.
The needs of low income elderly are expected to grow rapidly in the years immediately ahead. The
elderly have roots in the community. These roots should be respected by providing, to the extent
possible, standard housing within the city.

An additional 100 assisted housing units should be provided for the elderly. These units are
needed to meet the growing need for elderly assistance.
Innovative use of private market units should be made to more fully meet elderly need.
Programs of home repair, chore service and home health care may be the most appropriate means of
addressing their problems.

Residential Policy Cluster 4:
NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT, REDEVELOPMENT and REHABILITATION
POLICIES and PRIORITIES

The city will work to improve its overall residential quality by focusing neighborhood
improvement assets according to one of five specific strategies, or a combination thereof.
Subsequent to the adoption of this plan and pursuant thereto, the city should select and follow one or
a combination of the following five strategies as the basis for prioritizing municipal neighborhood
improvement expenditures :
Neighborhood improvement efforts should focus on Residential Planning Area 1 because it
has the best potential for improvement.
Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on Residential Planning Area 2 because it
might quickly deteriorate ifleft unattended and it might potentially revive if given
concentrated attention.
Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on Residential Planning Area 3 because it has

Page 1.13

�Ill
the most serious deterioration and socio-economic problems in the city.
Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on concentrated neighborhood improvement
sub-areas with historic resources.
Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on concentrated neighborhood improvement
sub-areas with high visibility.
These strategies are described in detail in subsequent policy statement paragraphs. These strategies
are based on the map entitled Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation
Policies and Priorities. This map divides the city into different neighborhood improvement areas.
Residential Planning Areas 1 through 6 establish the basic divisions. Areas 1, 2 and 3 require the
most active public involvement to encourage private investment while areas 4, 5 and 6 require less
active public involvement. The residential planning areas are themselves divided into improvement
sub-areas. Improvement sub-areas include new residential development, concentrated neighborhood
improvements, and on-sale code enforcement for owner-occupied housing plus periodic code
enforcement for renter-occupied housing.

Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on Residential Planning Area 1 because it
has the best potential for improvement and its improvement can do the most for the overall
quality of the city. Residential Area 1 has the best potential for improvement. Indeed, it is the key
residential area in the city, at least insofar as Pontiac's overall residential viability is concerned. It
is the key because it has a unique combination of assets and liabilities which make it particularly
suitable for improvement. The assets outweigh the liabilities by a substantial amount, but the
liabilities are of sufficient magnitude to pose a serious threat of spreading future blight. Major
assets include substantial areas with a low frequency of building deterioration and substantial areas
with a strong potential for concentrated neighborhood improvement. (See map entitled
Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Areas.) The best housing is in the
Seminal Hills subdivision. This well built housing has provided one of Pontiac's most important
residential assets over the past several decades and it can continue to do so in the future. Many of
the Seminal Hills homes have historic value. In addition to sound housing, Residential Planning
Area 1 has other significant assets which include:
Franklin Boulevard Historic District.
Crystal Lake Apartments.
In-fill housing potential in the Franklin Neighborhood Housing Services Area.
Vacant land with residential development potential.
Pontiac Municipal Golf Course.
Beaudette Park.
\
Crystal Lake Park.
Planned Orchard Lake Boulevard improvements.
Pontiac General Hospital.
Future neighborhood shopping center potential.
Pontiac State Hospital Site.
Major liabilities in Residential Planning Area 1 include several small sub-areas with a very high
frequency of building deterioration. (See map entitled Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment
and Rehabilitation Areas.) These areas are in close proximity to each other. They constitute the
point about which the city's hope for a strong residential future could collapse. Deterioration could
spread from these areas or they could be cleared to provide opportunities for redevelopment.
Redevelopment potentials include new single-family homes like that being developed in the new
Orchard Creek subdivision and non-residential uses. Other substantial liabilities in Residential
Planning Area 1 include Lakeside Homes and Martin Luther King Terraces.

Page 1.14

•Ill
Ill
Ill

•II

II

•
•
•
•
•

�Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on Residential P.lanning Area 2 because it
might quickly deteriorate if left unattended and it might potentially revive if given
concentrated attention. Residential Planning Area 2 contains a large number of substandard
housing units and substantial environmental problems. Problems are most prevalent in the
southern portion of Area 2 close to downtown. Residential Planning Area 2 also contains some
housing assets , including two residential historic districts listed on the National Register, the
Modem Housing Corporation Addition Historic District and the Fairgrove Historic District. In
addition to these two historic districts, Residential Planning Area 2 includes another neighborhood
in which aggressive code enforcement and rehabilitation assistance could bear fruit. The difficult
planning problem with Area 2 is the question of priority for action. Area 2 offers a strong potential
for success, just as does Area 1. However, the significance of success in Area 2 may not be as great
as success in Area 1. Unfortunately, diverting the necessary resources to Area 1 for a period of years
may result in further decline in Area 2. Area 1 may decline if it is left unattended while Area 2
receives the bulk of the city's revitalization resources and efforts. Both may decline if resources and
efforts are split. Other assets include Aaron Perry Park, Oakland Park and the historic Oak Hill
Cemetery. Adjacent uses are assets, particularly the rehabilitated two-family residential area on the
northeast side of East Montcalm and the Pontiac Division Headquarters on the north side of
Montcalm. Perry Street, a main artery through Residential Planning Area 2, is an attractive street,
particularly north of Area 2. This is an asset for the area. Oakland Avenue, another main artery
through Area 2 is very unattractive, thus a liability.
Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on Residential Planning Area 3 because it
has the most serious physical deterioration and socio-economic problems in the city.
Residential Planning Area 3 contains the largest number and most extensive concentration of
substandard housing and environmental problems in the city. Most of the substandard housing and
most of the environmental problems are concentrated in the portion of Area 3 located west of Martin
Luther King, Jr. Boulevard. Residential Planning Area 3 also has some sound housing, most of
which is concentrated east of Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard. The best is the Oakland Homes
development located between Michigan Avenue and M-59. Oakland Homes is a non-profit housing
developer that builds and finances its projects. There is also a small core of sound housing at O'Riley
Court on the west side of Residential Planning Area 3. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard functions
as a major route through the city connecting South Saginaw and M-59, and linking Area 3 to
Residential Areas 2, 4 and 5.
Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on the concentrated neighborhood
improvement sub-areas with important historic resources. This strategy can be justified on
two grounds. First, historic districts are per se desirable candidates for renewal. Their intrinsic
historic value makes them more likely to attract private reinvestment and thus highly susceptible to
successful renewal efforts on the part of the city. Second, two of Pontiac's three residential historic
districts are particularly good candidates for renewal. The Franklin and Fairgrove historic districts
are in basically good condition and they are located near other residential uses and near nonresidential uses which are positive influences and thus would make good neighbors for a
neighborhood receiving a concentrated renewal effort. Neighborhood improvement sub-areas with
the most important historic resources are sub-area "a" in Residential Planning Area 1, the Franklin
neighborhood, and sub-area "a" in Residential Planning Area 2, the Modern Housing Corporation
Addition neighborhood. Sub-area ''b" in Residential Planning Area 2, the Fairgrove Historic District,
presents more difficult revitalization problems because of its small size and the serious deterioration
around it. These sub-areas can be seen on the map entitled Neighborhood Development,
Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies and Priorities.

Page 1.15

�Neighborhood improvement efforts could focus on the neighborhood improvement subareas with the highest visibility. Sub-areas with the highest visibility are those located along
major arterials, including Huron, Orchard Lake, Oakland. Perry, University and Martin Luther
King, Jr. Boulevard. An extensive amount of residential development fronts on each of these major
arterials. Up-grading this residential development will definitely enhance the overall appearance of
the city more than any other residential policy. It will also help encourage private investment in
adjacent areas. Particularly benefited will be adjacent areas which have their own strengths. Fo r
example, upgrading the residential development along Huron and Orchard Lake Road will benefit
the Franklin Historic District and the Seminole Hills neighborhood.

Residential Policy Cluster 5:
POLICIES for SPECIFIC SITES and SUB-AREAS in
RESIDENTIAL PLANNING AREA 1

Most of the policies set forth below stand on their own as sound planning actions which the city
should undertake. However, they are particularly relevant to the policy of concentrating neighborhood
improvement efforts in Residential Planning Area 1.
The city should facilitate the expansion of the Orchard Creek Subdivision. The Orchard
Creek subdivision is a new single-family neighborhood developed by Oakland Homes, a non-profit
developer with a successful track record in Pontiac and elsewhere. Orchard Creek has 29 homes in
its first phase. Subsequent phases are planned. At the time this comprehensive plan was prepared,
most first phase units had been sold, some to families who could not qualify for the modest subsidy
available from the non-profit developer because their incomes were too high. This success proves that
Pontiac can be attractive to families with sufficient resources to exercise housing choice. Orchard
Creek is the fulcrum for leveraging the construction of substantial amounts of new housing and
stimulating substantial reinvestment in the maintenance and upgrading of existing housing.

The Franklin Neighborhood Historic District should be the focus of comprehensive
improvement efforts. This area has many fine historic homes suitable for residential use. In older
cities throughout the country, such historic districts have led rehabilitation and renewal trends.
Franklin is well placed to function as the leading area for a larger private rehabilitation trend. This
is so because of its proximity to downtown, to Pontiac General Hospital and to other areas of sound
housing.
\

The Franklin Boulevard Historic District should be the focus of comprehensive
improvement efforts. This area has many fine historic homes suitable for residential use. In older
cities throughout the country, such historic districts have led rehabilitation and renewal trends.
Franklin is well placed to function as the leading area for a larger private rehabilitation trend. This
is so because of its proximity to Downtown, to North Oakland Medical Center (Pontiac General
Hospital Division), and to other areas of sound housing. Furthermore, first class housing should
extend beyond the limits of the historic district itself to logical neighborhood boundaries. Logical
boundaries are the non-residential districts on the east, Huron Street on the north, North Oakland
Medical Center and Johnson Street on the east, and Orchard Lake Road on the south. The refined
Historic District Plan should set high "curb appeal" standards for homes in this area, and these
standards should be implemented in the zoning ordinance. Housing conditions throughout the
Franklin neighborhood must be first class if it is to successfully attract middle-income residents.

Page 1.16

II
II

�The city should vigorously disseminate and utilize the Franklin Neighborhood facade
study prepared by William Kessler and Associates. Property owners have already been
contacted about this work by mail, telephone and in person. Presentations have been made to home
owner groups. The whole process should be repeated periodically, perhaps annually. Planning
Division personnel should be assigned responsibility for building vigorous resident involvement in
the maintenance of historic standards.
Critical to this initiative is the provision of adequate financing for those costs of historic
preservation which exceed the costs of comparable standard rehabilitation. Additionally,
general rehabilitation assistance should be made available to low and moderate income homeowners
in this area. Community Development Block Grant (C.D.B.G.), as well as other public funds may be
utilized for this purpose.
The Franklin Boulevard urban design conceptual plan set forth elsewhere in this
Comprehensive Plan should be refined in detail with the participation of residents and
implemented, perhaps with T.I.F.A., D.D.A., and/or C.D.B.G. funds. In addition to the
restoration/preservation of the historic buildings, the city should consider installation of historic
street lighting, street trees, and other public improvements designed to maintain a higher standard
than applicable to the city in general. Again, this higher standard could be financed by T.I.F.A,
D.D.A, C.D.B.G., and/or the General Fund.
The city should vigorously disseminate and utilize the Franklin Boulevard facade studies
prepared by William Kessler and Associates and Kirk &amp; Koskela Architects. Property owners
should be contacted about this work by mail, telephone, and in person. Presentations should be
made to homeowner groups. The whole process should be repeated periodically, perhaps annually.
The city should provide an adequate commitment of staff support, particularly from the Office
of Land Use and Strategic Planning, as necessary to build vigorous resident involvement in the plan
refinement process, as well as in the maintenance of historic standards.
A qualified and well managed non-profit de·veloper should be sought to build new in-fill
housing in the Franklin Road NHS area. There is potential for new in-fill construction in the
Franklin Road Neighborhood Housing Services area, an area bounded by Bagley, Rapid, Franklin
Road , South Boulevard and the back lot lines of developments facing Woodward Avenue. This new
construction potential could be realized if a qualified non-profit developer with a track record were to
take an aggressive interest. It is important that the non-profit developer have a proven track record.
Pontiac's past experience with inexperienced non-profit developers has not been good. Many other
cities have had the same kind of negative experience with inexperienced non-profit developers.

New residential development sub-areas within Residential Planning Area 1 should receive
off-site infrastructure priority to stimulate new construction. Significant new residential
development sub-areas are located in Residential Planning Area 1. These sub-areas are designated
R-13, R-14, R-15 and R-16 in the maps entitled Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and
Rehabilitation Areas and Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies
and Priorities. They provide an opportunity for the construction of new housing. Construction of
new housing in these sub-areas should receive priority over all other new housing except expansion
of the Orchard Creek subdivision.

Page 1.17

�Beaudette Park must receive priority over other city parks in the allocation of maintenance
and policing resources. Beaudette is one of the city's most attractive·and intensively used parks.
It is an important asset for the west side of Pontiac and it can remain so, but only if it is well
maintained and policed.

•

The Pontiac municipal golf course should be retained at its present location for the
immediate future. At various times during preparation of this plan, consideration has been i;iven
to redeveloping the north half of the golf course for quality market rate housing. Such
redevelopment has been considered only in conjunction with development of golf course facilities at
an alternate location, such as the Kennett Road land fill site. Although golf course redevelopment
has been considered, it has not been adopted as a policy of this plan. Interest by Pontiac residents in
maintaining a complete 18 hole golf course is too great at this time to do otherwise. Whether
redeveloped in part or in total for housing or retained in full as an 18 hole golf course, the site is and
will remain an important asset for Residential Area 1. Municipal ownership of the golf course is not
necessary to preserve its use as a golf course.

Residential uses should be appropriately screened from the non-residential uses. There are
many areas where residential and non-residential uses abut each other or lie across the street from
each other. Screening should be ensured by strong screening and buffering requirements in the
Pontiac zoning ordinance. Figures 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 are conceptual illustrations of desirable screening
possibilities. They are provided as examples, not as specific recommendations to be incorporated
exactly as shown into the zoning ordinance. In addition to property line screening, trash receptacles
and outdoor storage areas should be screened and kept neat. It should be possible to incorporate
some maintenance and possibly screening requirements in a general ordinance from which no
grandfather privileges would be available rather than in a zoning regulation from which grandfather
privileges would be available.

Pontiac General Hospital should maintain good buffers and screening between itself and
its residential neighbors. Pontiac General is a community-wide asset as wel1 as a benefit to the
neighborhood. It provides employment and generates a residential market in Residential Planning
Area 1. Nonetheless, it should have an adequately buffered and attractive line of interface with its
residential neighbors. The zoning ordinance now incorporates screening and buffering requirements
intended to establish an appropriate interface between the hospital and its residential neighbors.
Such regulations must be enforced and upgraded if desirable.

The city should pursue prompt upgrading of Orchard Lahe Road. As of preparation of this
plan, boulevard construction with median landscaping has been planned but not budgeted. It should
be budgeted. This improvement is a very important part of a comprehensive strategy for
concentrating improvement efforts in Residential Area 1.

The city should pursue development of a neighborhood shopping center on Orchard Lake
Road. There is potential for a future neighborhood shopping center on Orchard Lake Road. A well
designed center with adequate parking and good landscaping and screening would be a real asset for
the surrounding neighborhoods. An ideal location for the center would be on the north side of
Orchard Lake Road between Green and Johnson where it could facilitate the redevelopment needed
in this area. However, until the exact scope of the potential center emerges as a specific proposal, it
should not be shown at a specific site on either the future land use map or the zoning map.

Page 1.18

II

�Residential structures on West Huron and Orchard Lahe Road should be on the fi,rst
priority list for rehabilitation assistance. The homes on West Huron and Orchard Lake Road
are important to the image of Pontiac as a whole and to the west side of Pontiac in particular. They
are important because of the large amount of traffic entering and leaving the city by West Huron and
Orchard Lake Road and because existing building and site conditions along these routes are already
quite good. Planned boulevard improvements will make Orchard Lake Road even more attractive
than at present.

Residential structures on Telegraph, West Huron and Orchard Lake Road may be
converted to non-residential use or raised and their sites redeveloped for non-residential
use, but only in an orderly sequence commencing with an existing non-residential use. This
means that conversion or redevelopment can be permitted for a residential structure next to an
existing non-residential structure or use. However, conversion or redevelopment should not be
permitted for a residential structure located between two residential structures.
The Lakeside Homes public housing project should be sold and its client population should
be accommodated at dispersed locations. Lakeside homes, like so many similar public housing
projects around the country, is a liability for its neighborhood as well as for many of its tenants.
Concentrating households with deep social and economic problems has not proved workable
anywhere. It may be possible to rehabilitate the structures for a mix of market-rate and modestly
assisted households. However, its current use might produce considerable market resistance if
rehabilitation rather than redevelopment is employed. The Crystal Lake Park adjacent to Lakeside
Homes has recently been upgraded with a new dam. Earlier dredging has made the lake
increasingly attractive. Recently added viewing areas are a plus. Further improvements are needed
to allow the park to realize its full potential. Such improvements should be coordinated with the
conversion of Lakeside Hornes to other than public housing use.
Inoperative vehicles and other environmental problems must be controlled on a priority
basis in Residential Planning Area 1. At various times during preparation of this plan,
environmental problems were observed in Residential Area 1. These environmental problems
include inoperative motor vehicles, smaller items of junk in residential yards, and poor yard
maintenance. They also include home repairs and improvements commenced, but left uncompleted
for a substantial period of time. These environmental problems are not at all pervasive in Area 1 or
any particular part ofit, but they did appear with modest frequency in the southeast part of Area 1.
They should be combated with specific code prohibitions and vigorous enforcement. Area 1 should
receive top priority for such environmental code enforcement.

Page 1.19

�0 ,,

=
8
N

0

Page 1.20

II

�Figure 1.4
FRANKLIN HISTORIC DISTRICT and
FAIRGROVE HISTORIC DISTRICT URBAN
DESIGN CONCEPT PLANS
Opposite Page

Notes for Figure 1.4
Franklin Historic District:
l.
An entryway should be developed at key
approaches to the historic district. The entryway could
incorporate an architectural "gate," brick pavers and special
landscaping. The architectural gate should be coordinated
with the proposed architectural fence (see 2 below). The
entryway concept is shown at Franklin and Huron and at
Franklin and Orchard Lake. It is also shown at Pike and the
east neighborhood boundary.

2.
An historic architectural fence could be built
to reinforce the distinct character of the district. The fence
should be constructed with brick columns and iron rails and
stiles. Existing fences should be the model for the proposed
fence. The historic fence is shown along Huron from the east
neighborhood boundary to Pontiac Central Hospital and
along the Orchard Lake neighborhood boundary.
3.
Ornamental trees could be installed to
reinforce a distinct neighborhood character. Ornamental
trees are shown along Huron from the cast neighborhood
boundary to Pontiac Central Hospital and along the Orchard
Lake neighborhood boundary. Ornamental trees are also
shown along Franklin from Huron to Orchard Lake and
along Pike Street from Franklin to the east neighborhood
boundary. Ornamental trees could be extended along Pike to
Wide Track Drive West.
4.
The public infrastructure should be
maintained in a first class condition along important historic
streets. Priority should be given to street pavement, curb
and sidewalk improvements along Franklin from Huron to
Orchard Lake and along Pike from Franklin to the cast
neighborhood boundary.
5.
Brick pavers could be installed to highlight
key intersections. Special intersection pavers are shown at
Franklin and Pike and at Pike and Williams. They should
be coordinated with entryway pavers (see 1 above).
6.
Historic street lighting should be installed
along Franklin and Pike. The light poles should be low in
height.
7.
"Woonerf" improvements could be installed in
the residential sections of the neighborhood, particularly
along Mary Day and Henry Clay. "Woonerl" is Dutch for
"living street." A woonerf or living street is designed to be
comfortable and attractive for pedestrians and those who
just want to sit on a bench. Also, children should be able to
play in a wooneifwith relatiue safety. A woonerfprovides for
motor vehicle access to individual properties and it may
provide extra on-street parking spaces, but is not a
comfortable street on which to drive any great distance.
Woonerfs in the Franklin Historic District can incorporate

h1ick pavers, histonc street furniture and histonc street
lighting.
8.
Certain local streets could be closed to
through trallic to help m:untam quietude and secunty.
Closure possibilities are shown beyond the historic district
limits in order to mcorporate immediately adjacent
residential areas mto the residential part of the historic
dist1;ct. The closure concept and specific closure locations
should be evaluated by neighborhood residents.
9.
Priority pavement, curb and sidewalk
improvements could be extended along Pike between the east
historic district boundary and Wide Track Drive West. So
could ornamental trees and historic street lighting. The
neighborhood "gateway" shown on Pike at the east
neighborhood boundary could occur instead at Pike and Wide
Track D1;ve West. The buildings and parking areas along
the segment of Pike west of Wide Track Drive should be
upgraded in accordance with appropriate historic design
standards. One set of appropriate standards is given in the
Downtown chapter of this plan. All or some of these
approaches would strengthen the important link between
downtown and the Franklin Historic District.
10.

Franklin Historic District boundary.

11.

Huron Street.

12.

Orchard Lake Avenue.

Fairgrove Historic District:
1.
An entryway should be developed at Perry
and Fairgrove. The existing vacant lot at this intersection
could be acquired for this purpose. The entryway could
incorporate an architectural "gate," brick pavers and special
landscaping.

2.
"Woonerl" improvements could be installed
along Fairgrove. "Woonerf" is Dutch for "living street." A
woonerf or living street is designed to be comfortable and
attractive for pedest1;ans and those who just want to sit on a
bench. Also, children should be able to play in a woonerf
with relative safety. It may provide extra on-street parking
spaces, which would be particularly important in Fairgrove
because of the multifamily use. However, a woonerfis not a
comfortable street on which to drive any great distance. The
Fairgrove woonerf, if built, can incorporate brick pavers,
historic street furniture and historic street lighting.
3.
Certain streets could be closed to through
traffic to help maintain quietude and security. One closure
possibility is shown at Fairgrove and Saginaw. This would
completely eliminate through traffic and concentrate all
ingress and egress at Perry, which is, overall, a more
attractive approach to the district. Other closure possibilities
are also shown. The closure concept and specific closure
locations should be evaluated by neighborhood residents.
4.

Fairgrove Historic District boundary.

5.

Perry Street.

6.

Saginaw Street.

Page 1.21

�Figure 1.5
WOONERF or LIVING STREET CONCEPTS for the
FRANKLIN and FAIRGROVE HISTORIC DISTRICTS

II

lm:

.IF·

·· ····
:::::::.
·.·.·.·.·.·.··.
·······
··· ..
··· ·· · .

;.-p,.......=--c

(»'!""!'~
~

~

'--·······

i ··- --~
~

~

~

Page 1.22

:~ ...

··•···

i~

:

�Residential Policy Cluster 6:
POLICIES for SPECIFIC SITES and SUB-AREAS in
RESIDENTIAL PLANNING AREA 2

Most olthe policies set forth below stand on their own as sound planning actions which the city
should undertake. However, they are particularly relevant to the policy of concentrating neighborhood
improvement efforts in Residentw.l Planning Area 2.
The Modern Housing Corporation Addition Historic District should be the focus of
comprehensive improvement efforts. This district contains well built homes with modest historic
value. Though less impressive than the Franklin Historic District, it is still of sufficient value to
lead revitalization of all of Residential Planning Area 2.
Critical to this initiative is the provision of adequate financing for those costs of historic
preservation which exceed the costs of comparable standard rehabilitation. Additionally,
general rehabilitation assistance should be made available to low and moderate income homeowners
in this area. Community Development Block Grant (C.D.B.G.), as well as other public funds may be
utilized for this purpose.
An urban design plan should be developed for Modern Housing Corporation Addition
Historic District. In addition to the restoration/preservation of the historic buildings, the city
should consider installation of historic street lighting, street trees, and other public improvements
designed to maintain a higher standard than applicable to the city in general. These higher
standards could be financed by T.I.F.A., D.D.A., C.D.B.G., and/or the General Fund.
An historic facade study should be prepared for the Modern Housing Corporation Addition
Historic District. The Facade Study prepared for the Franklin Historic District provides a model of
the type of study that is needed for the Modem Housing Corporation Addition Historic District.
Once the study is prepared, property owners should be contacted about this work by mail, telephone
and in person. Presentations should be made to homeowner groups. The whole process should be
repeated periodically, perhaps annually.

The city should provide an adequate commitment of staff support, particularly from the Office
of Land Use and Strategic Planning, as necessary to build vigorous resident involvement in the plan
refinement process, as well as in the maintenance of historic standards.

The Fairgrove Historic District should be the focus of comprehensive improvement efforts.
This area has fine historic homes. They were originally designed as single-family structures, but
now most have been converted for multiple-family use. It may be that the historic value of these
structures coupled with a revitalization of the nearby downtown could lead to the reconversion of
these homes for single-family use. However, it is not likely that city regulations can successfully
facilitate or even force such conversion over the near or medium term. Zoning regulations in the
Fairgrove Historic District could allow two- or three-family use, but with high minimum unit size
requirements to help ensure good quality units that are consistent with the objective of preserving
the historic quality of the district. Regulations should also ensure that multiple-family conversions
have adequate parking and site amenities. Housing conditions on Fairgrove and on the immediately
adjacent streets should be first class if property owners are to be encouraged to keep their structures
in good condition.

Page 1.23

�Critical to this initiative is the provision of adequate financing for those costs of historic
preservation which exceed the costs of comparable standard rehabilitation. Additionally,
general rehabilitation assistance should be made available to low and moderate income homeowners
in this area. Community Development Block Grant (C.D .B.G.), as well as other public funds may be
utilized for this purpose.
The Fairgrove urban design conceptual plan set forth in this comprehensive plan should
be refined in detail with the participation of residents and property owners and
implemented, perhaps with T.I.F.A., D.D.A., and/or C.D.B.G. funds. The urban design
conceptual plan is shown in Figures 1.4 and 1.5. It calls for the following capital improvements in
the Fairgrove Avenue Historic District: entranceway features; historic street lighting; specially
designed on-street parking areas interspersed with wide sidewalks and landscaping; closings of
Fairgrove Avenue at Saginaw Street to keep non-local traffic out of the neighborhood. In addition,
the refined historic district plan should set high "curb appeal" standards for homes and these should
be implemented in the zoning ordinance. Streets, curbs and sidewalks should be maintained to a
higher standard than applicable to the city in general. Again, this higher standard could be financed
by T.I.F.A., D.D.A, C.D.B.G., and/or the General Fund.

An historic facade study should be prepared for the Fairgrove Historic District. The Facade
Study prepared for the Franklin Historic District provides a model of the type of study that is needed
for the Fairgrove Avenue Historic District. Once the study is prepared, property owners should be
contacted about this work by mail, telephone and in person. The whole process should be repeated
periodically, perhaps annually.
The city should provide an adequate commitment of staff support, particularly from the Office
of Land Use and Strategic Planning, as necessary to build vigorous resident involvement in the plan
refinement process, as well as in the maintenance of historic standards.

Aaron Perry Park and Oakland Park must receive priority over other parks in the city in
the allocation of maintenance and policing resources. These parks can be important assets for
Residential Planning Area 2 only if they are well maintained and policed.

Residential structures on University and Perry should be on the first priority list for
rehabilitation assistance. The homes on University and Perry are important to the image of
Pontiac as a whole and to the northeast side of Ponti a~ in particular. They are important because of
the large amount of traffic entering and leaving the city by University and Perry and because
existing building and site conditions along these routes are already quite good, particularly as they
approach the city limits.

Inoperative vehicles and other environmental problems must be controlled on a priority
basis in Residential Planning Area 2. During preparation of this plan, substantial
environmental problems were observed in Residential Planning Area 2. These environmental
problems include inoperative motor vehicles, smaller items of junk in residential yards, and poor
yard maintenance. They also include home repairs and improvements commenced, but left
uncompleted for a substantial period of time. These environmental problems are most pervasive in
the portions of Residential Planning Area 2 than in Area 1 and less pervasive than in Area 3. They
should be combated city-wide with specific code prohibitions and vigorous enforcement. Residential
Planning Area 2 should receive top priority for such environmental code enforcement, if it is to be the

Page 1.24

•II

Ill

II
II

•II
•

�focus of a concentrated upgrading effort.

Residential Policy Cluster 7:
POLICIES for SPECIFIC SITES and SUB-AREAS in
RESIDENTIAL PLANNING AREA 3

Most of the policies set forth below stand on their own as sound planning actions which the city
should undertake. However, they are particularly relevant to the policy of concentrating neighborhood
improvement efforts in Residential Planning Area 3.
The area around O'Riley Court should be on the first priority list for rehabilitation
assistance and for clearance of dilapidated structures. O'Riley Court is a short cul-de-sac on
the west side of Residential Area 2. It was built as a redevelopment project in the 1960's. It contains
just a few single-family homes, most of which are well maintained. O'Riley Court shows that a small
enclave of good housing can survive near serious deterioration, particularly if designed as a
neighborhood onto itself and if accessible to major thoroughfares. Pontiac's vigorous policy of
condemning and demolishing nearby substandard homes has no doubt helped make more viable than
it might otherwise be.
Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, Marshall and parallel streets just to the west should
be on the first priority list for rehabilitation assistance and for clearance of dilapidated
structures. Homes on Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard provide a locus of stability for adjoining
neighborhoods and an image benefit to the city. Many of the older homes are sound; some are
particularly attractive and well maintained. In addition to sound older homes, new single-family
homes were developed along Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard just prior to preparation of this
plan. These new homes are a potential asset for the neighborhood although they initially were not
well received by the market. South of Auburn, Marshall (the first street west of Martin Luther King,
Jr. Boulevard) has many well maintained homes. North of Auburn, Marshall plus several other
parallel streets to the west have well maintained homes.

The city should continue to vigorously weed out seriously dilapidated structures in
Residential Planning Area 3. For decades, the high concentration of substandard structures in
the western portion of Residential Area 3 has been the object of Pontiac's most vigorous and
extensive code enforcement efforts, particularly efforts to have unsafe structures demolished. The
result is a high frequency of vacant lots and a corresponding reduction in the number of substandard
structures. The city's demolition efforts have not yet run their full course. When they have, the
resulting vacant property will be a neighborhood and community asset. The removal of substandard
structures should continue by implementing the policies and priorities shown on the Neighborhood
Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies and Priorities Map.

The city should pursue development of a neighborhood shopping center on Auburn Road.
There may be potential for a future neighborhood shopping center on Auburn Road. This potential
has been studied by more than one public interest groups seeking such an asset for the
neighborhood. A well designed center with adequate parking and good landscaping and screening
would indeed be an asset for the neighborhood. However, there is strong competition from
supermarkets located just east of Opdyke Road and therefore the strength of the Auburn Road
potential is uncertain. This uncertain potential should be accommodated by making policy provision
for such a center, but not designating a specific site in either the future land use plan map or on the
zoning map.

Page 1.25

�The city should pursue the redevelopment of the area north of South Boulevard for
industrial use. There are approximately two dozen homes east of Ma_rtin Luther King, Jr.
Boulevard between the abandoned Michigan Air Line railroad right-of-way and South Boulevard.
These homes lie in the center of some of the city's potential industrial land. The future land use map
should provide for the redevelopment of these homes for industrial use. Zoning for industrial use
should occur when there is a comprehensive industrial redevelopment plan ready to be implemented.

Murphy Park should be scaled back in area in order to provide a new residential
development opportunity and in order to facilitate better policing. At the time this plan was
prepared, and for many years prior, Murphy Park had been a liability to the neighborhood. It was
the locus of antisocial behavior, including drug dealing and drug use. A key part of the problem has
been the secluded parking area which can be accessed from Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, but
which is not visible from Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, or practically any public or private
property. Murphy Park contains beautiful natural topography and vegetation. These assets have
been used successfully for supervised, active recreation. However, Murphy Park contains more
acreage than can be put to safe, supervised recreation use. This surplus acreage has residential
development potential. This residential potential could be combined with adjacent vacant land on
the north and east sides of Murphy Park.

Some block faces on Auburn Road should be reserved for residential development rather
than allowing strip commercial uses to be scattered along its entire length. There are
examples throughout Oakland County of decent and, in some cases, very expensive residential
development on major thoroughfares. Although recent single-family development experience on
Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard suggests that new strip residential potential is not strong on the
east side of Pontiac, it is very possible that it will one day be feasible. Furthermore, it is even more
likely that there never will be sufficient demand for commercial or other non-residential sites to
absorb all or even most of the Auburn Road frontage. Such demand as there may be for additional
non-residential use of vacant lots on Auburn should be accommodated on those block faces which
already have a significant pattern of non-residential development.

Inoperative vehicles and other environmental problems must be controlled on a priority
basis in Residential Planning Area 3. During preparation of this plan, substantial
environmental problems were observed in Residential Planning Area 3. These environmental
problems include inoperative motor vehicles, smaller items of junk in residential yards, and poor
yard maintenance. They also include home repairs and improvements commenced, but left
uncompleted for a substantial period of time. These environmental problems are most pervasive in
Residential Planning Area 3 than in any other part of ~he city. They should be combated city-wide
with specific code prohibitions and vigorous enforcement. Residential Planning Area 3 should
receive top priority for such environmental code enforcement, if it is to be the focus of a concentrated
upgrading effort.

RESIDENTIAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
This section contains two important analytical maps, identified as Figures 1.6 and 1.7, and related
explanatory material. The two maps are entitled "Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and
Rehabilitation Areas" and "Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies
and Priorities." The first of theses two maps synthesizes data about the character of the city's
residential areas. The second map sets forth areas where five different revitalization policies might
be appropriate. Although it contains policy recommendations, this map is considered background

Page 1.26

•
•II

II
II
II
II

II

II
II

II

�information rather than a policy document per se because it would be ill].possible to fully implement
its policy suggestions within the city's resource limits. The additional priority setting called for in
Policy Cluster 4 is required.
The two maps show the city divided into six Residential Planning Areas (RPA's). The area
boundaries were chosen because they lie along major divisive elements such as railroad lines, major
thoroughfares and substantial non-residential areas. All neighborhoods within each individual
Residential Planning Area can be expected to share a common future of improvement or
deterioration, depending on the overall level of public and private upgrading effort.

Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Areas
The "Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Areas" map synthesizes data
about the character of the city's residential areas. The data synthesized includes land use and
building condition data. Both the land use and the building condition information was obtained from
surveys completed by the Pontiac Planning Division and by the consultants for this plan. Pontiac
Planning Division land use information dates from a comprehensive survey done in 1985 and
updated periodically based on observations of the staff. Pontiac Planning Division building condition
data dates from a comprehensive windshield survey done in 1976. The findings of this survey were
updated by consultant surveys done during 1989 and 1990.
The map indicates the following eight neighborhood development, redevelopment and rehabilitation
areas, each of which is explained on notes which appear on the opposite page of the map:
Very High Frequency of Building Deterioration
High Frequency of Building Deterioration
Moderate Frequency of Building Deterioration
Low Frequency of Building Deterioration
Strong Potential for Concentrated Neighborhood Improvement
Neighborhood Assets
Predominantly Non-Residential Areas
Vacant Land with Residential Development Potential

Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies and Priorities
The "Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Policies and Priorities" map
sets forth the following areas, each of which is explained on notes which appear on the opposite page
of the map:
New Residential Development Sub-Area
Concentrated Neighborhood Improvement Sub-Area
Systematic Code Enforcement to Remove Unsafe Structures and Other Severe
Environmental Blight Sub-Area
On-Sale Code Enforcement for Owner-Occupied Housing and Periodic Code Enforcement for
Renter-Occupied Housing
Private Sector Landscaping and/or Other Beautification

Page 1.27

�R

-~~------::~-~:t
I

'

-~ ;:-_:,_
--,
---"
.·--=-=

·:

ii=§]
·; ~·
=~
- ,=-;,

_,'

. . '/ 1

---1

'

\

· H1 ;rr=-;~;;, .:

l,"r--•

w
I

, I

.- ··-•,

;

_, _
'I
, · .:;::L....:.5

1--,-G ,_ I

R

5:

i

I

I
I

,;
1,

1
I

\

-

\

~-j

1

l ~m1u1
B
I

Page 1.28

1

Predominant! Y Non-Residential Area
Vacant Land wtth
. Residential Develop ment Potential

�Figure 1.6
NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT,
REDEVELOPMENT AND
REHABILITATION AREAS
Opposite Page

Notes for Figure 1.6
The "Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and
Rehabilitation Areas" Map sets forth the following are as:
Very High Frequency of Building Deterioration: In
aggregate, homes in these areas are in the won;t condition
in the city. Many of those in poor condition are of
inadequate original construction, a circumstance which is
particularly common in the southeast part of the city (RPA
3). Many of the homes have deteriorated to the point that
they may be classified "substandard" or "major repair"
structures. Substandard homes are so seriously
deteriorated that the cost of making them sound would
exceed the value of the property in sound condition. Major
repair homes require substantial investment to bring them
to a sound condition. Major redevelopment of areas
classified "Very High Frequency of Building Deterioration"
would be appropriate if funds for such redevelopment were
available. Public investment in rehabilitation would not
likely result in an overall upgrade of the neighborhood
because the funds available would be inconsequential in
proportion to the magnitude of the problem. Despite the
overall high level of deterioration, some homes in these
areas are in relatively good condition. These few homes can
be classified as "minor repair" or "sound." There are even a
few block faces where most of the homes are in quite good
condition.

Strong Potential for Concentrated Neighborhood
Improvement: Areas so designated ulfor some promise for
responding tu consecrated neighborhood improvement
e fforts . Goud quality UJiginal housing stock coupled with
moderate detenoratiun of some of the structures 1s the
common basis for this classification.

Neighborhood Asset: A. variety of sites are classified as
neighborhood assets. Parks and lakes are classified as
assets. The golf course and cemeteries are also classified as
assets because they provide attractive open space. Certain
major school sites are assets and so too is Pontiac General
Hospital. Major assets provide a strung positive physical
influence upon which neighborhood revitalization efforts
can build.
Predominantly Non-Residential Areas: These areas
which 111-e not part of the residential fab1ic of the
neighborhoods. They nonetheless can have an important
positive or negative influence on neighborhood
revitalization efforts.

Vacant Land with Residential Development Potential:
Not all land so classified need necessarily end up in
residential use. However, the city will benefit from the
expansion of a middle-class residential base. New
development will obviously facilitate such an expansion.

High Frequency of Building Deterioration: In
aggregate, homes in these areas are very much like the
areas classified as "Very High Frequency of Building
Deterioration," but with a somewhat lower proportion of
substandard and major repair structures. These areas are
not good prospects for upgrading through rehabilitation
assistance.
Moderate Frequency of Building Deterioration: In
aggregate, homes in these areas are in relatively sound
condition. Substandard and major repair structures can be
found, but they are closer to being exception rather than the
rule. There are numerous minor repair structures. Private
investment in these areas is substantial. Investment of
public funds for rehabilitation might make sense in these
areas because of their basically sound condition. However,
there are insufficient public funds to 1-espond to all of the
deterioration even in these areas. Their long term well
being will depend on continued ptivate investment in
upkeep.

Low Frequency of Building Deterioration: In
aggregate, homes in these areas need only minor repair or
they are sound. However, there are some low substandard
and major repair structures.

Page 1.29

�- -

-

RI

-- ~ Ra
~
./

--:::.--·- -

~

- - -

-

__,

-

- - ·-

-

-

-~- -

-

-

R6

i_,,. 'L•.

_...

-1.

'

---------t

•Rg
·=
.
I
·-

-

- - - -

A3

__ ,,,

•
•

• I

~

-

~.

-1- ·

• .,.

I

Rs \..-, ,

t'

.. ::

;_

·-. -

...

R7

-·

Ra
--'=----

I

: ::J :
I

I

I

I

-

'I''

' I

11-.:...• I I. ,
!

;.- - 6~
_,' : /. ·.-,-_ 3-1
'.-=-- -~•..:•'" -I
I

'

J•

·•:~•-: Ir /:_)
.. ,

_. -···:(le;:, ·;
,·!

Ru

;
..

I

_, • 1

··-- · 1

I
)

8
11TW]

l
I

( 'oncentrutcd Ncighhorhood Improvements: Code Enforcement.
llehabilitaiton Ass1stnncc. Neighborhood Capital Improvements

!-,vstemnttc Code Enforcement to llemovc Unsafo Structures
and Other Severe 1!:nvironmental 131ight

I=- - 'I

On-Sale Code 1!:nforccment for Owner-Uccuptcd Housing and
l'e nodic Code l!:nforccmcnt for Rcnter-Occuptcd Housing

Private ::iector Landscaping and/or Other llca uttlicat1on

Page 1.30

''

I
'

I

\

�Figure 1.7
:'-IEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT.
REDEVELOPMENT AND
REHABILITATION POLICIES AND
PRIORITIES
Opposite Page

Notes for Figure 1.7
The "Neighborhood Development, Redevelopment and
Rehahililalion Policies and Prioril1es" map sels forth the
following:

New Residential Development Sub-Area: Siles shown
fur new residential development are vacant land areas.
Most have never heen developed. Ar()as here noted as R-15
and R-16 once accommodaled buildings which have now
heen razed. Most of the new residential development areas
were des1gnaLcd for low density residential development in
the ?011.twc :1.000 Plu11. The areas here noted as R-11 and
R-12 were designated as park land in lhe Ami we :I.IXJO
l'/wi, lhey mdude land which is now part of Murphy Park
and land Lo the nonh and east which is not now nor never
was part of Murphy Park. The area designated R-15 was
designated as park land in the Po11/iiu: :1.000 JJ!wL . The area
noled as R-13 was designated for medium dens1ly
development in the Pontwc :2.(XJO Pltm. The areas noted as
R-4, R-5 and R-6 have poor soil and drainage conditions.
These conditions may necessitate cluster dcvelopmcnl or a
planned development configuration which blends singlefamily detached with single-family attached or even
multiple-family development whilll leaving other areas as
open space.

Concentrated Neighborhood Improvement Sub-Area:
Concentrated neighborhood improvement areas arc key
arl!as for the revitalization of the entire city. They a1'l! the
arnas in which most of the city's limited rchabililation and
code enforcement 1-csourccs should he concentrated. Th()se
areas should also receive priority in the allocation of
neighborhood capilal improvements. Neighborhood capital
improvements directed particularly toward these areas
should indude: reconsl1uclion of substandard local st1'l!ets,
curbs and sidewalks; modification of local streets and
intersections to divert through trallic away from residential
a1'l!as; and residential st1'l!el tree planting. Concentrated
neighborhood improvement a1'l!as should be given prio1ity
in the systematic code enforcement effo1t to rnmove unsafe
structures and other severn environmental blight, even
though these problems occur less fre4uenlly in concentraled
neighborhood improvement arnas than in some other areas.
Concentrated neighborhood improvement areas should he
given prio1ily in the effo1t to inspect owner-occupied homes
on-sale and the eff01t to inspect rental-occupied dwelling
units periodically, at least to the extent that any primities
a1'l! given in these programs. In theory, no p1ioritizing of
these efforts should be necessary since they are intended to
he city-wide programs financed from foes charged for
inspections and licenses.

Sub-Area: The;;e areas have Lhe lea;;t potential for
1mmeci1aw improvement. Housing conallions an, u, 0
severely cictenorawa lur ava1iahle n!hahilitation a.~s1stance
assets to he used elfuct1vely. i\!o1'l! detenoralion and
demoiILion wtil &lt;,ccur nefore these areas hecome prom1smg
prospects 1ur puhlic improvement expenciitures. fn the
meantime, the most scnous envll'onmcntal blight must be
addresseci on an ongomg hasis. This means that st1uctures
which arc a threat to health and safoly must come down as
fast as the city can complete the necessary due process
µrocedUl'l!S. Puhlic rehalnlitat10n dollars should not he
expended in these a1·eas. Other puhlic capital
improvements should be avoided, except as necessary to
o.:nsu rc minimum acceptahle levels of health and safoly or
except as may be necessary and dirt.!clly related to efforts to
improve concentrated neighborhood improvement areas.
The area should he suh1ect to on-sale code enforcement for
owner-occupied houses and pe1iodic code enforcemtJnt for
rental propc1t1es.
On-Sale Code Enforcement f,,r Owner-Occupied
Housing and Periodic Code Enforcement f'or RenterOccupied Hou.,ing: The map designates this category for
all areas of the c1Ly not designated m one oflhe three
preceding categones. Actually, on-sale code enforcement
and pe1iodic code enforcement should occur m all developed
a1'l!as, as is noted in the discusswns ahove. On-sale code
enforcement for owner-occupied st1uctures is Lnggercd hy
the sale of an ownl!r-occup1ed properly. All properties for
which there is no rental license issued arc considered
owner-occupied. Every owner-occupied residential unit is
inspected and brought up to code at the time its ownership
changes. An "existing housing" code can be the ba.~is of the
inspection program so that older homes do not have to meet
the highest new housing standards. Pllriodic code
enforcement of renter-Occupied units is intended to occur on
an annual hasis at the time of rental license renewal.
Inspectors must allocate some of their time to identifying
unlicensed rental units and enforcing licensing
re4uircments. It is expected that the full costs for hoth onsale and pe1iodic inspections and enforcement will be fully
horn by inspection fotas. Inspcclwn fees are to he set aside
in an earmarked account and not mingled with the general
fund. In addition to on-sale and pc1iodic inspecl10ns of
housing units. minimum standards for yard upkeep should
he enforced. On-sale and pe1iodic code enforcement
programs arc discussed in more detail in Lhe resid1mtial
policies of the plan.

Private Sector Landscaping and/or Other
Beautification: Private sector landscaping and/or other
heautilication is designated for areas where maJor nonresidential development is already located or anticipated.
Such landscaping is needed to make the overall character of
the city desirnhle for current and prospective residents.

Sy.~tematic Code Enforcement to Remove Unsafe
Structures and Other Severe Environmental Blight

Page 1.31

�Chapter2
OFFICE, RETAIL and OTHER
COMMERCIAL AREA LAND USE POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses

INTRODUCTION--------------------------

Following this introduction, the chapter is organized into one main section entitled "Office, Retail
and Other Commercial Policy Clusters." There are four policy clusters. Each pol' cy is stated as the
topic sentence of a paragraph. The balance of the paragraph contains data and analyses which are
related to the policy. 'The four policy clusters are as follows :
Cluster 1: Provide Commercial Land to Serve Residents' Needs and Capture Markets
Outside the City
Cluster 2: Regulate Existing Commercial Uses and Guide their Expansion to Benefit the
General Health, Safety and Welfare
Cluster 3: Encourage Development of New Commercial Uses and Improvement of Existing
Commercial Uses Through Special Capital Expenditures and Rehabilitation and
Redevelopment Assistance
Cluster 4: Encourage Improvement of Existing Commercial Uses Through Special Municipal
Service Programs
Chapter 14 of this plan contains additional office, retail and other commercial land use policies. 'The
policies in Chapter 14 relate particularly to the Future Land Use Map.

OFFICE, RETAIL and OTHER COMMERCIAL POLICY CLUSTERS _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Commercial Policy Cluster 1:
PROVIDE COMMERCIAL LAND to SERVE RESIDENTS' NEEDS and
CAPTURE MARKETS OUTSIDE the CITY
Limit the amount of commercially designated land in small lots fronting on major
thoroughfares to an amount proportional to the needs of Pontiac's population. The future
land use plan and the zoning map should designate somewhat more commercial land than will
actually be needed. This ensures competition and keeps the price of commercial land reasonable.
However, the future land use plan and the zoning map should not designate vastly more commercial
land than will be needed. 'The amount of commercial land in Pontiac and that provided for in past
planning efforts is as follows:

Developed commercial land already provides an adequate supply. There are over 600 acres in
retail, office and service commercial uses. This amounts to about five percent of the city's
total land area and eight to nine acres of commercial land per 1,000 population. 'This supply
is within the "normal" range, that is the range within which most cities fall . However, in
addition to its own commercial land area, Pontiac is served by Summit Place and Miracle
Mile, both just outside the city limits . Auburn Mills, a new regional mall with approximately
2,000,000 square feet of gross lea sable acres, is being developed on a 220 acre site off I-75

Page 2.1

�between Baldwin and Perry. Additional related retail facilities are expected to be developed
on out parcel. According to the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments' Regional
Impact Review, this center will be a "value oriented" discount retail and entertainment
complex with a 40-mile trade radius. It will be only the third of its type known to exist in the
country. A small part of the site will fall within the City of Pontiac. The rest will lie just
north of Pontiac in the City of Auburn Hills.

Past planning concepts considered by the city provide excessive commercial land. Commercial
land use designations set forth in the Pontiac 2000 Plan and the unadapted plan of the mid
1980's overreached the city's commercial potential. Commercial land designations for the
unadapted plan of the mid 1980's totaled 908 acres exclusive of the downtown and exclusive
of the 50 acre Oakland Point shopping center which subsequently developed at the northeast
corner of Telegraph and Elizabeth Lake Road. This amounts to almost 13 acres per 1,000
population and over seven percent of the city's total land area, both very high ratios. There
is no reason to believe that these ratios are sustainable, given the limited spending power of
Pontiac residents and the difficulty that Pontiac sites will have attracting retail and office
uses in the very competitive Oakland County market.
The benefits for limiting commercially designated land are as follows:

Avoid mixing commercial uses with vacant land. An excessive supply of commercial land
may result in commercial uses being thinly scattered among vacant lots which may not
develop because they are less attractive for residential use than they would be if they did not
have commercial neighbors, and there is insufficient demand from non-residential use.
Avoid mixing commercial uses with residential uses. An excessive supply of commercial land
may also result in commercial uses being thinly scattered among residential uses, for which
they will not make good neighbors. When commercial uses are clustered together, the
amount of interface between commercial and residential uses is minimized.
Maximize the impact of positive developments. Changes in the building environment come
slowly. The strip commercial pattern observed by the Pontiac 2000 Plan did not change
during the 1980's. It is very possible that it will not change much during the next 10 to 20
years. Yet despite the persistence of urban form over time, change does occur. Old buildings
and uses are abandoned and new ones spring up. This process can be better managed for the
benefit of the city if the available locations for new development are more limited than they
have been in the recent past. The result of excessive supply of commercial land is that such
new development as does occur is so scattered that it has no real impact on any one area. Its
benefits are swamped by the liabilities of the areas in which it locates.
\

Take advantage of suburban commercial development potentials at the peripheries of the
city. The most important new commercial development in and around Pontiac orients itself away
from the city. Oakland Pointe shopping center is built on the edge of the city and is named for the
County, not the city. Across Telegraph, Pontiac Mall made major improvements and changed its
name to Summit Place. To the north, the proposed manufacturer's mall is initially planned with its
storm water retention facilities within the city limits and its building outside the city limits. It is
oriented to I-75 traffic, not traffic which will flow through the city. To the east, extensive office
development is taking place in the Oakland Technology Park; the area will be home to the newly
developed Chrysler Technology Center and many other office and technology-based businesses.
Reject requests from property owners for "spot" commercial zoning unrelated to specific
policy objectives of this plan. Such spot commercial zoning is illegal under Michigan zoning case

Page 2.2

�law because it is done for the benefit of the individual property owner rather than for the general
health, safety and welfare in conformance to a comprehensive land use:Strategy. [See Clan
Crawford, Michigan Zoning and Planning, 3rd Edition; Institute for Continuing Legal Education,
University of Michigan, 1988; page 237.] The benefits for rejecting spot commercial zoning requests
are as follows:

Avoid mixing commercial uses with vacant land. Spot commercial zoning can result in
commercial uses being thinly scattered among vacant lots which may not develop because
they are less attractive for residential use than they would be if they did not have
commercial neighbors, and there is insufficient demand from non-residen tial use.
Avoid mixing commercial uses with residential uses. Spot commercial zoning can also result
in commercial uses being thinly scattered among residential uses, for which they will not
make good neighbors. When commercial uses are clustered together, the amowit of interface
between commercial and residential uses is minimized.
Maximize the impact of positive developments. Changes in the building environment come
slowly. The strip commercial pattern observed by the Pontiac 2000 Plan did not change
during the 1980's. It is very possible that it will not change much during the next 10 to 20
years. Yet despite the persistence of urban form over time, change does occur. Old buildings
and uses are abandoned and new ones spring up. This process can be better managed for the
benefit of the city if the available locations for new development are limited to those which
are predesignated in conformance with an overall strategy rather than in response to the
potentials of the moment. The result of spot commercial zoning is that such new
development as does occur is so scattered that it has no real impact on any one area. Its
benefits are swamped by the liabilities of the areas in which it locates.
Commercial Policy Cluster 2:
REGULATE EXISTING COMMERCIAL USES and
GUIDE THEIR EXPANSION to BENEFIT the GENERAL
HEALTH,SAFETYandWELFARE
Do not permit the intrusion of strip commercial uses into residential areas. The intrusion of
strip commercial uses into residential areas adjoining to the rear is generally undesirable, but
sometimes necessary in order to accommodate expansion of important employment and tax base
assets. Such intrusion usually manifests itself by construction of parking lots on formerly residential
lots. In Pontiac, the need to expand strip commercial properties can often be accomplished on
adjacent sites fronting on the same thoroughfare as the use being expanded rather than on adjacent
sites to the rear which front on a local residential street. Similarly, the city might consider
conversion of residential structures located along major thoroughfares such as North Telegraph
Road, Baldwin Avenue, North Perry Street and University Drive, to non-residential use or their
demolition and redevelopment for non-residential use, but only in an orderly sequence commencing
with an existing non-residential use. This means that conversion or redevelopment can be permitted
for a residential structure next to an existing non-residential structure or use. However, conversion
or redevelopment should not be permitted for a residential structure located between two residential
structures.

Review and revise as may be necessary the zoning regulations which set commercial on-site
parking and loading standards. These standards have been in place for over ten years. The
Pontiac 2000 Plan identified a need for more rigorous standards. The Planning Division believes
that need still exists based on the experience of the past ten years.

Page2.3

�Review and revise as may be necessary the zoning regulations which govern adult
entertainment uses. Adult entertainment regulations were enacted several years prior to
preparation of this plan. These regulations require adult entertainment uses to be dispersed rather
than congregated in close proximity to one another. This dispersal strategy is based on experience
which has shown that the concentration of adult entertainment uses can have a blighting influence
on nearby uses, both residential and non-residential. This experience has been documented by the
City of Detroit. Based on the City of Detroit documentation , the Supreme Court of the United States
upheld Detroit's dispersal requirement. The City of Pontiac should evaluate how well its dispersal
regulations have worked since enactment and consider whether or not refinements are necessary. It
may be desirable and reasonable to enact refinements which explicitly exclude adult uses from
certain key areas of the city, for example, in the downtown area and along the most heavily traveled,
image-important thoroughfares such as Huron Street, Orchard Lake Road and South Saginaw.
However, it would most likely be unconstitutional to explicitly exclude such uses from the city as a
whole or even to enact regulations which had that effect without doing so explicitly.
Review and revise as may be necessary zoning regulations governing site plan review; site
plan review regulations should include discretionary standards which allow the city
condition approval of commercial site plans upon a discretionary determination that they
incorporate sound site design principles. The principles incorporated in discretionary site plan
review standards should address : 1) the internal arrangement of buildings and other site design
elements and 2) the relationship of site design elements to surrounding land uses and the public
street system. Provision should be made for considering the location of curb cuts and the impact of
future street widening on site layouts.

Review and revise as may be necessary zoning regulations governing building and parking
setbaclls for commercial and other non-residential buildings and the width of landscaped
buffer strips. In general, setbacks and landscaped buffer strips should be greater on major
thoroughfares which carry heavy traffic volumes, although more intensive screening and
landscaping can serve in lieu of greater setbacks. Setbacks on thoroughfares which may be widened
in the future should be sufficient to leave a workable site after widening, but they should not be
based on an envisioned future right-of-way because to do so might constitute a taking of property
without compensation.

Develop Specific Plans to govern and coordinate development and redevelopment along
major thoroughfares and in other key areas; incorporate such plans in the city's zoning
regulations either directly or by reference with prevision for enforcement via the site plan
review process. Efficient development and redevelopment of small commercial parcels usually
requires that development on adjacent parcels be coordinated. Specific plans provide a mechanism
for accomplishing such coordination. They are less detailed than site plans, but more detailed than
traditional zoning regulations. While traditional zoning regulations typically establish minimums or
maximums for building setback, building height, parking spaces and landscaping, specific plans may
establish the exact location of front facades, the exact location of pedestrian circulation ways, the
exact location of automobile circulation isles linking adjacent properties and the placement of curb
cuts. Specific plans should be worked out at the expense of the city, but in cooperation with property
owners and they should be adopted following one or more public hearings. They may be
implemented through site plan review provisions of the zoning ordinance, but this practice may be
an innovation in Michigan, an innovation which is as yet untested in state appellate courts. In lieu
of implementation of specific plans via the site plan review process, they can be implemented by the
acquisition of limited property rights, either through voluntary sale or condemnation. Such
acquisition might be an eligible block grant expenditure.

Page 2.4

�Utilize on-street parking as a buffer between thoroughfares and sidewalks with heavy
pedestrian traffic potential, provided that such on-street parking does not seriously impede
essential traffic flow. On-street parking was once viewed as undesirable because it impedes the
flow of traffic in two ways: 1) it reduces the amount of thoroughfare width available for traffic
movement, and 2) it causes friction between through traffic and vehicles turning into and out of onstreet parking spaces. By the time this plan was prepared, a very substantial body of professional
opinion held that on-street parking provides a desirable buffer between pedestrians and heavy
traffic. This professional opinion is the basis for this policy.
Enact more restrictive appearance controls so that future convenience food stores are more
attractive neighbors for residential uses. Appearance controls should address the following
issues:
1.

Restrictive sign controls should be enacted and enforced. Sign controls should limit the
size and number of temporary and permanent window signs. Temporary outdoor signs
should be prohibited.

2.

Garish paint should be prohibited. Figure 2.1 of this plan includes a color chart which
suggests the range of colors that could be permitted and prohibited. However, it is not
the intention of this plan to finally establish that range. Enactment of a specific
approved color range should follow a special public review process including public
hearings.

3.

Site and building maintenance should be required as a condition for the renewal of
business licenses.

4.

Architectural design controls should make building bulk more compatible with adjacent
homes.

5.

Parking should be provided, where possible and where not likely to bring excessive traffic
into a residential area.

6.

Unattractive features of buildings and sites should not be exposed to view from public
ways or from adjacent houses.

Code enforcement should be tied to business occupancy certificates and business licenses in
order to upgrade strip and other commercial areas. Occupied, but poorly maintained
commercial buildings are a significant condition and cause of blight in Pontiac. Buildings which are
unsafe should be condemned. Buildings which are a blighting influence because of poor maintenance
should be upgraded. Property owners should be pursued with the full force of the law. Upgrading
can be forced on existing properties by making them subject to building and property maintenance
codes. Inspections can be made:
1.

Prior to issuing certificates of occupancy for new owners and tenants,

2.

Prior to issuing or renewing occupational and business licenses, and

3.

Periodically, for example, annually or semiannually.

The cost of inspections should be fully born by the businesses which seek the certificates of
occupancy of business licenses. An occupational or business license can be required in order to use a

Page 2.5

�retail or office building to "warehouse'' or otherwise store goods. This will enable the city to force
better upkeep of buildings which are boarded up. The problem of business appearance is discussed
in detail in the section of this plan entitled ''Thoroughfare Urban Design."

•
•

Vacant commercial buildings should be subject to the same upkeep requirements as
occupied buildings and structures which are not maintained should be razed. Vacant,
poorly maintained commercial buildings, many of which are obsolete, are a significant condition and
cause of blight in Pontiac. Buildings which are a blighting influence because of poor maintenance
should be upgraded. Property owners should be pursued with the full force of the law. Upgrading
can be forced on existing properties by making them subject to building and property maintenance
codes. Inspections can be made on a systematic basis with inspectors initially concentrating on areas
which will reinforce housing and neighborhood improvement priorities. The cost of inspections could
come from fees charged for business licenses, if the city attorney thinks that such a funding approach
would be reasonable. If not, the cost of inspections should come from the general fund or from any of
various special funds such as appropriate tax increment financing funds.

Continue to study amortization of certain non-conformities as a means for improving the
commercial environment of Pontiac. In calling for the amortization of non-conforming uses, the
Pontiac 2000 Plan recognized that substantial improvement to the viability and appearance of
Pontiac commercial districts will require the removal of many blighting commercial uses.
Unfortunately, amortization is still not an available option under current Michigan zoning case law.
The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that amortization is not permissible, not because it is
unconstitutional, but because cities lack the statutory authority. [See Clan Crawford, Michigan
Zoning and Planning, 3rd Edition; Institute for Continuing Legal Education, University of Michigan,
1988; page 12.] If Pontiac decides to substantially upgrade its appearance in a reasonable amount of
time, it could mount a serious lobbying effort to convince the State Legislature to add at least a
limited amortization authorization to the zoning tool box. Amortization could be most effective if
applied to eliminate inappropriate land uses. It could also be very effective even if applied only to
eliminate certain undesirable characteristics of uses, such as:
1.

Excessive signage;

2.

Clutter building materials and garish paint;

3.

Unscreened or inadequately screened dumpsters;

4.

Unscreened or inadequately screened outdoor storage;

5.

Inadequate parking;

6.

Unpaved and uncurbed parking areas;

7.

Inadequate landscaping.

Page 2.6

\

•

�Commercial Policy Cluster 3:
ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT of NEW COMMERCIAL USES arid
IMPROVEMENT of EXISTING COMMERCIAL USES THROUGH
SPECIAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES and REHABILITATION
and REDEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
Invest public funds in public streetscape improvements, but only in the downtown and on
major traffic routes where the private business environment is sound and in reasonably
good physical condition; utilize no maintenance or low maintenance improvements. The
improvements referred to include special street and sidewalk paving, street furniture, median and
right-of-way landscaping and similar improvements. Over the past decade, the city made a major
investment in such public streetscape improvements on South Saginaw. The investment was made
in an area with substantial blight, including many vacant and boarded up and marginally utilized
buildings. The investment did not result in a revitalization of the business climate or a reversal of
blight, and they deteriorated rapidly. This is almost universally the experience of other cities which
have attempted to upgrade a derelict area with cosmetic public infrastructure improvements.
Cosmetic improvements, no matter how costly, simply will not work unless the receiving area is
simultaneously the subject of substantial private investment attention. (If the receiving area is the
subject of private investment interest, then public improvements may be necessary to bring it forth ,
but cosmetic improvements alone will not stimulate the interest when it does not otherwise exist.)
Since the city has limited assets for cosmetic improvements, it must invest where its resources will
do the most good. Investments in key portions of the downtown are likely to meet this test.
Investments on West Huron are also likely to do much good. South Saginaw would have been better
served by the razing of one or two derelict buildings than by the kind of expensive streetscape
improvements which it received.
Make rehabilitation loans and/or grants to business property owners, but only: 1) in the
downtown development authority area and downtown in general, 2) in tax increment
finance authority areas, 3) on major traffic routes where the private business environment
is sound and good looking, and 4) in strategic thoroughfare residential areas where one or
two loans or grants will eliminate serious appearance problems or blight. At the time this
plan was prepared, it was expected that the city might be able to provide very limited assistance for
the rehabilitation of business properties. Community Development Block Grant funds may be
available for areas and activities which qualify. Other funding sources might include tax increment
finance authority funds, Economic Development Administration funds and Department of Commerce
funds. These funds could be utilized to revitalize some existing neighborhood strip commercial
areas. If used strategically, they might generate private investment in a three to one private-public
ratio. Such a ration will be necessary if the effort is to prove worthwhile. No single funding source
or combination of funding sources will provide sufficient resources to do all that needs to be done.
Thus, publicly assisted commercial redevelopment achievements cannot possibly make a major
improvement in the overall quality of Pontiac's physical environment. Therefore, it is absolutely
essential to target such funds where they will do the most good. The central business district, West
Huron and Orchard Lake Road offer the best potentials at the time of plan preparation. Other
opportunities might materialize over the mid range future.

Page2.7

�:,Iost Acceot:ible Colors

•68

us

Least Acceptable Colors

:S1.,'YBERS C'IDICATE PANTO:-."E /R\ COLOR CODE DESIGNATION

High Contrast Unacceptable

-.-.~~-

--r,,,
,_...~~
.· . .
,

~"'J,..T-"'!t:

Convenience Store Improvement Concept
.

,.,.,..,,,
::""\'••: •... -

-

-:::.::~.

· -- · -_:. :t~~·=.. r.v.-~r. .:~/
--·\. / ......
I

I

t-"",~ail:J--_=:1.-i-.L..:,_--.-===~~~~~:::::...·,_
1

--==r--.

-~~
/- ~

iff1

.

._, b:==
·'

----

Page 2.8

0

9

I

�Figure 2.1
SUGGESTED RANGE of PERMITTED and PROHIBITED COLORS
for Convenience Stores and Other Commercial Uses
Opposite Page Above

Figure 2.2
CONVENIENCE STORE IMPROVEMENT CONCEPT
an example based on the photograph in Figure 2.1
Opposite Page Below
1) Remove plywood window areas and replaced with break resistant Plexiglass. 2) Remove front
signs and replace with one facia mounted sign naming the store and several discrete, coordinated
window signs identifying products and announcing specials . 3) Install canvas awning for
appearance and to conceal roll-up security shutters for front windows . 4) Replace cyclone fencetype security gate with iron rail and stile-type gate that can open into roofed over front ''vestibule."
5) Remove paint from front facade to reveal original brick or repaint facade the color of the original
brick. 6) Repaint side facade the color of the front facade. 7) Re-size side wall sign and place it to
coordinate with architecture, i.e. place it ''breathing'' distance behind the brick-concrete block joint
and align the top and bottom with the top of awning and the bottom of the front windows. 8)
Provide paved, on-site parking spaces behind low screen wall if there is adequate site area. 9)
Provide paved parking space in the right-of-way if there is not adequate area for on-site parking.

Page 2.9

�Commercial Policy Cluster 4:
ENCOURAGE IMPROVEMENT of EXISTING COMMERCIAL USES
THROUGH SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SERVICE PROGRAMS
Encourage owners of existing convenience stores to voluntarily improve the appearance of
their properties in compliance with new zoning regulations. Encouragements should include
the following mnnicipally financed activities:
1.

At city expense, prepare individual building improvement plans and site improvement
plans with cost estimates and present these plans to convenience store owners. An
example of a convenience store improvement concept appears in Figure 2.2. Other
suggestions appear in Figures 3.8 through 3.11.

2.

Invite convenience store owners and managers to periodic special lnncheons and /or
dinners hosted by the Mayor. Make these occasions pleasant for the guests while using
them as an opportnnity to lobby for upgraded appearance.

3.

Have the Mayor give annual , semi-annual or other periodic awards for the best
appearing convenience store or stores in the city.

4.

Have the Planning Division and/ or the city's Director of Publicity prepare press releases
praising award winners and explaining the appearance standards to which the city aims.

5.

Have the Planning Division monitor appearance of each convenience store in the city and
use this information in making awards and preparing press releases.

Cooperate with businesses seeking additional parking by developing municipal parking
lots supported by special assessment districts. It is sometimes possible to provide parking for
more than one business in a separate parking located within easy walking distance of all the
businesses served. Acquisition of land and construction of parking facilities can be financed by a
special assessment against the business properties which would benefit.

Cooperate with businesses wishing to expand by vacating streets, alleys and municipal
easements, where possible. Sometimes, expansion of commercial properties can be accomplished
to its full potential by vacating alleys or mnnicipal easements. Sometimes such vacations are
necessary to provide continuity between two separate properties which must be assembled in order
to facilitate desired expansion. The city should cooperate by vacating rights-of-way and easements
that are not absolutely necessary to effective traffic fl~w or other essential public purposes.

Cooperate with businesses seeking better security by coordinating municipal policing with
private policing. Mnnicipal police services will never be able to provide all the policing desirable in
an urban environment. Some businesses will want to secure private police services to supplement
municipal services. Public and private police services should be coordinated provided that
coordination does not involve inequitable distribution of public police services.

Page 2.10

•

�Figure 2.3
DESIRABLE SCREENING for OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS

\

\\

5 OR 6 FOOT MASONRY WALL

FRONT YARD

1-

w
w

a:

I-

"'
a:
0

z
:E
NOTE: WHEN SITE SIZE PERMITS, DUMPSTERS SHOULD
BE PLACED in REAR DELIVERY AREAS SCREENED with
5 or 6 FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALLS. IF THE ANGLE of
VISION FROM STREETS and NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES
to DUMPSTERS IS SMALL, then NO GATE NEED BE
REQUIRED. WHEN DUMPSTERS ARE PLACED in SIDE or
FRONT YARDS, THEY SHOULD BE SCREENED with A 5 or
6 FOOT MASONRY WALL and a GATE. THE GATE
SHOULD FACE AWAY from MAJOR STREETS.

MAJOR STREET

Page 2.11

�Chapter3
URBAN DESIGN POLICIES for THOROUGHFARES.......;..__ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses

INTRODUCTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Following this introduction, the chapter is organized into two main sections entitled "Background
Information" and "Urban Design Policies for Thoroughfares."
The "Background Information" section explains that all cities have both urban design assets and
liabilities. It points out that Pontiac has substantial assets, but also very significant problems.
Finally, it cites research work done which shows that, although aesthetics is generally believed to be
a matter of individual taste, there are a number of urban design aesthetic preferences that are so
widely held and recognized that they must be given great weight in planning.
The "Policies" section groups policies into three clusters. Each policy is stated as the topic sentence
of a paragraph. The balance of the paragraph contains data and analyses which are related to the
policy. The three policy clusters are as follows :
Cluster 1: Enact Regulations which can Help Eliminate Pontiac's Major Urban Design
Liabilities
Cluster 2: Make Municipal Capital Improvements Conform with Regulations Applicable to
Private Development
Cluster 3: Expend Public Revitalization Funds in Areas with Strong Urban Design Assets

BACKGROUND INFORMATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
No city, no matter how rich or endowed with natural beauty, is perfect from an urban
design perspective. All cities have urban design liabilities and assets. Some cities are famous for
their assets. Other cities are famous for their liabilities. Florence, Italy and Boston, Massachusetts
are known as important examples of the former. Oakland, California, justly or not, is known as an
example of the latter.

Pontiac is endowed with some particularly remarkable urban design assets. These assets
offer the prospect that it could be among the best cities in terms of overall urban design quality.
Pontiac's important assets include rolling topography, lakes and large public open spaces. Pontiac
also has some very interesting historic architecture, particularly in the downtown area, but also
along its thoroughfares.

Unfortunately, Pontiac has very serious urban design liabilities. Most of these derive from
the inadequate maintenance of private property and lack of respect for public taste. A drive down
the city's thoroughfares is, in many instances, a depressing display of one of the worst kept urban
environments in southeast Michigan. The most prevalent problems are not unique to Pontiac. They
can be seen in other Oakland County communities, across the state and across the nation. However,
they appear with much greater frequency in Pontiac than in most other communities. Pontiac's most

Page3.1

�serious urban design liabilities were documented by a 1989 survey of th_e following thoroughfares:
South Saginaw Street from South Boulevard to Wide Track Drive
Perry Street from Wide Track Drive to Walton Boulevard
Orchard Lake Boulevard from Telegraph Road to Wide Track Drive
Auburn Avenue from Opdyke Road to Wide Track Drive East
Oakland Avenue from the western city limits to Wide Track Drive
Huron Street from the western city limits to M-59
Telegraph Road from Golf Drive to the Oakland County Government Complex
University Drive from Wide Track Drive to the eastern city limits
Walton Boulevard from Perry Street to the western city limits
The thoroughfare urban design survey identified the appearance problems relating to:
Problem parking lots
Unsightly signs
Fenestration eyesores
Cyclone fences
Visually cluttered or garish buildings
Weeds, trash, dumpsters and outdoor storage
The negative findings of the thoroughfare design survey are mapped in Figures 3.1 through 3.6.
Some of the positive findings are mapped in Figure 3. 7. Figures 3.8 and 3.10 provide photographic
examples of survey findings. Figures 3.9 and 3.11 incorporate sketch suggestions based on the
photographic examples in Figures 3.8 and 3.10, respectively.

Environmental aesthetics is not just a matter of individual taste; all hinds of people share
measurable expectations for an acceptable visual environment. City planners, both
professional and lay, have long believed that an unattractive environment is an undesirable
environment. This belief was a major force in the City Beautiful movement, which created the
American planning profession in the early decades of the twentieth century. During the past 30
years, studies have been done to evaluate the importance of the visual environment to the general
public. Two kinds of findings have emerged. First, people desire and respond favorably to a
coherent, orderly environment. Second, people also desire and respond positively to visual
stimulation and complexity. A visual environ in which either the desire for order or the desire for
stimulation is out of balance is an unattractive environment. One study recently reported in the
professional literature is particularly significant for Pontiac. This study used 400 interviews of
residents and visitors to determine what people liked about the appearance of Knoxville and
Chattanooga. The interviews revealed public agreemeJt about what constitutes a visually likable
environment. The great majority of respondents liked:
greenery;
open space;
water bodies and water courses;
interesting topography;
well-maintained buildings and sites;
well-designed buildings;
orderly areas;
historically significant areas; and
older neighborhoods with good quality homes.

Page 3.2

�In general, the great majority of respondents disliked:
traffic congestion ;
billboards and chaotic signs;
industrial buildings and sites;
utility poles and wires;
dilapidated buildings;
poorly kept sites; and
dirty neighborhoods.

The ''principle of the second man" provides a positive paradigm for acting on many of the
most often expressed urban appearance likes and dislikes. This principle is illustrated and
explained in Figure 3.12 and its caption.

URBAN DESIGN POLICIES for THOROUGHFARES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Urban Design Policies for Thoroughfares, Cluster 1:
ENACT REGULATIONS which CAN HELP ELIMINATE
PONTIAC'S MAJOR URBAN DESIGN LIABILITIES
Enact building occupancy or occupational licensing regulations which require that
parking lot surfaces be well maintained. Of the 200 parking lots identified by the thoroughfare
urban design survey as having visual liabilities nearly one-half had poorly maintained surfaces.
Some lots have substantial potholes while others have only cracked or pitted surfaces. Unpaved
parking lots and parking lots with grass and weeds growing through the surface as a result of either
deterioration or thinness were noted.
Enact zoning or other regulations which require that parking lots have continuous
concrete curbs. Of the 200 parking lots identified by the thoroughfare urban design survey as
having visual liabilities, about one-fourth lacked continuous curbing and as a result looked unkempt
or otherwise poorly maintained. Some lots without continuous curbing had crisply maintained
pavement and/or peripheral landscaping so that they present a neat appearance. Such lots are not
included in the tabulation of urban design liabilities. There are some very acceptable parking areas
which utilize perimeter bumper stops rather than curbs. However, curbs at the perimeter are a
more effective way to make a parking lot look neat and finished. Perimeter bumpers may not be
maintained properly.
Enact zoning regulations which require parking lots to be screened or landscaped so that
they present an attractive appearance from public thoroughfares. Of the 200 parking lots
identified by the thoroughfare urban design survey as having visual liabilities, about one-third were
deficient in landscaping. Parking lots with inadequate landscaping include those without any
landscaping whatsoever, those with such a minimal amount of landscaping it is almost nonexistent,
and those large parking lots which may have a reasonable amount of perimeter landscaping but little
or no interior landscaping. A low masonry screen wall may serve effectively in lieu oflandscaping
where sites are small.

Initiate a program to install and maintain trees between the curb and sidewalk along all
thoroughfares as well as local streets. The decision to invest in property improvements is

Page3.3

�effected by the perception of Pontiac as a desirable place to live and work. The aesthetic condition of
the city's streetscapes significantly impacts this perception. Consequen.tly, public landscape
improvements to enhance the streetscape positively impacts the decision to invest in property
improvements by the private sector. Individual citizens and groups should be encouraged to involve
themselves in the subsequent maintenance of the landscape improvements in the public right-ofway.

Review recently enacted sign control regulations in order to improve the appearance of the
city and the economic utility of signs; revise regulations as may be necessary. Signs which
advertise products and services are certainly necessary. However, the type, number, and condition
of signs combined to create a signage landscape that can be either aesthetically pleasing or blatantly
unattractive. The thoroughfare urban design survey identified 241 sites where existing signs create
a negative visual impact as a result of their type, number or condition. Specific problems include the
following:
Undesirable sign types:
Billboards
Garish signs
Off-premise advertising signs
Oversized signs
Unnecessary pole signs
Portable signs
Projecting signs not coordinated with architecture
Roof signs not coordinated with architecture
Signs advertising defunct businesses
Garish streamers or banners
Make-shift signs

Excessive number of signs:
Sites containing a multitude of signs which give the immediate impression of being
"too many"

Poor sign condition:
Signs with no faces or no copy
Faded or peeling wall signs
Signs in poor physical (structural) condh.ion
"Homemade" signs which are cheaply constructed, poorly painted, and amateurish in
nature
Recognizing the unattractive signage landscape that had been created in Pontiac, the city Planning
Division undertook to revise sign regulations during the same time period that this comprehensive
plan was in preparation. Following enactment of these new sign regulations, they should be
vigorously enforced. They should also be monitored for effectiveness and refined, if necessary, after
they have been in effect long enough to gage their utility. Consideration should be given to
amending the new regulations, if necessary, by prohibiting or restricting the undesirable sign types,
excessive signage and poor sign conditions.

Enact building code or other appropriate regulations which establish minimum aesthetic
and workmanship criteria for boarding-up buildings and filling in building fenestration.

Page 3.4

�Throughout Pontiac, once attractive or at least inoffensive buildings have been made ugly by
unsightly modifications to the original fenestration pattern. The thoroughfare urban design survey
observed 44 sites with window problems. These fall into two categories:

Boarded-up windows: Boarded-up windows have been closed off completely, usually because
the building in which they are located is not being used at all or because it is being used for a
purpose for which security is more important than light. Windows which are boarded up are
very often the most disturbing visual impression obtained by the passing motorist. There is
probably nothing that makes an area appear to be depressed and run down more than a
series of such windows.
Unsightly fenestration in-fills: These modifications often amount to little more than the
boarding up of windows, but they leave some portion of the original window area glazed.
Modifications are made without any consideration for the aesthetic effect.
Out of the 44 deficient sites noted, about 40 percent contained boarded-up windows. Over half
contained windows that had been filled in an inept and unsatisfactory fashion.

Enact zoning or other regulations which prohibit cyclone fences from front yards and
along public thoroughfares and/or which establish aesthetic and maintenance standards
for cyclone fences which are pennitted. Cyclone fences, in reasonable numbers in certain areas
for specific purposes, are acceptable. Cyclone fences become a problem when there are so many that
the city looks like a war zone. Barbed wire at the top intensifies the "war zone" effect. If the fences
are in poor condition, the visual impact is worse. Inadequate original construction such as the
absence of a top rail almost always means a fence in poor condition. Metal slats designed to "screen"
unsightly views are themselves unsightly. Cyclone fences with dark finishes look better than those
with the standard finish. The green fence around the Pontiac Municipal Golf Course on Golf Drive is
an example. The black fence around the parking lot of the Michigan Family Services facility on
Orchard Lake Road is another. The thoroughfare urban design survey observed approximately 60
cyclone fences which surrounded either parking lots, entire sites, or portions of sites. The visual
effect of all these fences is certainly a negative one. The one bright note is that of all the cyclone
fences noted, less than 15 percent are in a tattered, broken, falling-down condition.

Enact zoning or other architectural design control regulations which prohibit visually
cluttered and garish buildings and which explicitly define the design elements which
constitute same. Visually cluttered buildings contain an excessive variety of different construction
materials. As an extreme example, there are buildings on which can be found all of the following:
brick and stone; horizontal wood siding in one color and vertical wood siding in another color; metal
siding; concrete block; and glass doors and windows. This is too much for one building; the result is
visual chaos. Garish buildings use glaring, bright and/or contrasting colors that assault the eye and
make quiet enjoyment of surrounding property difficult. Buildings which lack continuity of
architectural style have a negative visual impact, though this is a less dramatic problem than visual
clutter and garishness.

Review the recently enacted zoning regulations which set screening requirements
applicable to commercial and other non-residential general outdoor storage areas; revise
as may be necessary. Outdoor storage areas, which are a necessary component of certain
commercial and industrial enterprises, should be screened from view from the street. The
thoroughfare urban design survey identified about 35 sites that have outdoor storage areas which
are unsightly and not screened. Most have chain-link or cyclone fences for security, but these fences
usually are negative visual elements. Many sites are auto sales or service establishments which are

Page 3.5

�crowded with vehicles: both vehicles which are for sale and vehicles which are waiting to be
repaired.

Maintain and enforce zoning regulations which set screening requirements applicable to
commercial and other non-residential outdoor trash storage areas; revise as may be
necessary. Dumpsters are necessary but they are not very attractive They should be screened from
view. The thoroughfare urban design survey identified about 35 sites that have unsightly dumpsters
in a relatively prominent location visible from a public thoroughfare. Pontiac has enacted zoning
regulations which require dumpsters to be screened with a solid masonry wall with a gate. These
regulations should be maintained and enforced.
Enact building occupancy or occupational licensing regulations which require that
pervious surface areas, both required and unrequired, be kept with healthy vegetative
cover and be free of trash and debris. The thoroughfare urban design survey identified nearly 20
sites with poorly maintained landscaped areas and/or trash and debris. These sites include sites
with grassed or otherwise landscaped areas that are not maintained and are taken over by weeds.
These sites also include sites with an accumulation of trash, both from on-site and off-site sources.
Some of the sites identified are vacant lots which thoughtless people have used as dumps. Both the
poorly maintained vegetative areas and the trash produce an unattractive environment.

Review and revise as may be necessary recently enacted zoning regulations which set
general screening requirements applicable to commercial and other non-residential uses
which are adjacent to residential uses. General screening requirements for commercial and
other non-residential uses adjacent to residential uses were enacted several years prior to
preparation of this plan. Such regulations should be vigorously enforced. They are desirable to
protect residential uses from unattractive views of commercial and other non-residential uses.
Figures 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 illustrates desirable screening possibilities. These figures appear in the
Residential Area Land Use Policies section of this plan.

Urban Design Policies for Thoroughfares, Cluster 2:
MAKE MUNICIPAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CONFORM
with REGULATIONS APPLICABLE to PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
Municipal parking lots and parking structures should be developed to the same high
urban design standards applicable to private par~ing lots. The City of Pontiac should set a
good example when developing municipal parking lots and parking structures. It is important that
city parking lots and parking structures be designed, constructed and maintained to the same high
standards which are established for private facilities by Cluster 1 of the Urban Design Polices for
Thoroughfares. It would be preferable if the City of Pontiac municipal facilities exceeded the
standards established for private facilities. There will always be budgetary excused for not following
this policy. Such excuses should be shunned except in the most extreme circumstances.

Other municipal facilities should also conform to the same high urban design standards
applicable to private facilities. The City of Pontiac should set a good example in the design,
construction and maintenance of municipal facilities other than parking lots. Such facilities include
buildings, grounds, outdoor storage areas, signs and the like.

Page 3.6

�Urban Design Policies for Thoroughfares, Cluster 3:
EXPEND PUBLIC REVITALIZATION FUNDS in
AREAS with STRONG URBAN DESIGN ASSETS
Expend public funds to upgrade the commercial environment in areas which already have
substantial visual assets. The thoroughfare urban design survey identified 74 significant visual
assets which help improve the urban design quality of Pontiac. Walton. Perry and University had
the most with 16, 15 and 11 respectively. Telegraph had seven, a relatively large number for a short
stretch of thoroughfare. South Saginaw, Oakland Avenue and West Huron had relatively few.
Visual assets appear as many different land uses. Over 20 percent of the sites identified as visual
assets are in multiple-family residential use. Walton Boulevard has the most, but they are also
represented on Perry, University, Auburn and Telegraph. Over 20 percent of the visual asset sites
are parks, cemeteries or other open space. This fact emphasizes how important Pontiac's rather
substantial park facilities are to the appearance of the city. About 12 percent of the visual assets are
institutional uses such as schools and churches; many of these have large sites with well-maintained
landscaping making them a special type of open space. Almost 15 percent of the visual assets are
commercial uses. A few are shopping centers. Another 15 percent are office uses. The commercial
and office uses are not examples of "award-winning" architecture and site design. Their visual value
is magnified by their context, which is generally so bereft of visual value. Most are merely neat,
inoffensive buildings that do not contribute to the clutter which is otherwise so prevalent. Some
might be considered visual liabilities in other cities. For example, the east facade of the Truck and
Bus plant on Saginaw is an asset in context. However, it falls short of what would be an acceptable
suburban commwiity standard. A few of the commercial assets are shopping centers. Some are fast
food businesses which are noteworthy for their meticulous landscaping and upkeep, not for their
architecture. The fast food industry's contribution to Pontiac's visual environment is evidence of its
economic viability in the city. There are a few industrial and distribution service assets. The
outstanding Huburt Distributors site is additional evidence of what profits can do for the visual
environment. The most modest and perhaps the most interesting of the industrial assets is Scott &amp;
Sons' Speedometer Service on Walton; this asset is achieved with attention to maintenance and daily
housekeeping. It is a marked contrast to the vast majority of wispeakably ugly automobile repair
uses in the city.

Page 3.7

�Figure 3.1
PROBLEM PARKING AREAS

Walton Blvd.

•

•

-------..,;::.
- ..

• ~.. •!~--~.~~•~-----·•...a:______
,:i

• •

• ••

••

V,

Ol

C

ii
-0

Columbia Ave.

&lt;D '.

•
0

1 MILE

~

Page 3.8

iii--- ...

�Figure 3.2
UNSIGHTLY SIGNS
,,11

•

••

•

----~------. .•••

.

• ~ • e,,___,.w
...,a..11.,o~n.s..1.v.d..._ _

'"••··

...

.,,,:

~-- A

,U

._.

,._..,,.

,.

tia fa . . . -

C.f ._ ... .

,:j ,
_,•_.'!...~.•·.,.,.- ----•a:-.
:_____

.••·

Columbia Ave .

~

•
•

~

,

I,?

-~e

-- ,~~
, j,

.,. · ··•'-'

__

.'.l
:i

Featherstone Ave. •

Elizabeth Lake Rd .

0

M-59

1 MILE

..
l

J

ll

Page3.9

�Figure 3.3
BOARDED OR UNSATISFACTORY WINDOW AREAS
. ....

---:

~·

. . ....

1"'!11

0._--0

-

.., -.1 ZJ

ft

•
a.i ~1

•

•

_______

c ..
§ :
32 .:i

&gt;
&lt;i: .

ID 'l

&gt;- ~
vi ~

&lt;II '

,

__._

, .1 ~.-

·-·

_ _.

Walton Blvd .

&gt; -'
Columbia Ave.
&lt;i:;...._..;.,...;....;;.....;.;..;...

_!Sennett

.'\;If

Q)

:Q :
(!) .

:

c ·

0
-,

"'Ol ,

c .
i5 .

..,

.

_____...,.

e:,'-·

Montcalm St.

~~

..,~e.
~

.;/'. Featherstone Ave.

~
,.--.

1--..

~

.' ,
I

!

Page 3.10

~ ....,_, _ .

"'

ct

�Figure 3.4
UNATTRACTIVE CYCLONE FENCES
1 1il lloil.- M

11,.◄

......

YI 4.a ,.;;.,.

Walton Blvd.
J
3

J

...

~

,_. _ , ,. Mil

..... .

/
~

0------..0
i

.-

••

•

Columbia Ave.

':
l

Kennett

'

/

' Featherstone Ave.;

M-59

Huron St.
Auburn Ave .

•

0

1 MILE

\

1
·;.

:I

"\

}

u. _.:i

.

'"l • -

.

J

.. J

:l

~ .J

I

:
ll

0. --~0
Page3.11

�Figure 3.5
VISUALLY CLUTTERED OR GARISH BUILDINGS

Walton Blvd.
ffl'l9t , ..!!!!liilli§il '

1--

,:j

•

a:

,,,

J

Ol '

c :

&lt;Ii ·

&gt; •

&lt;C ;

: 3

i5

"C '

('.i ;

Columbia Ave .
Q)

&gt;

&lt;(

i

l-

---.'

C
&gt;--,-::,o
_______
_ _

-;;;
0

✓- ·

. ...

-~

-- MontcalmSt.

•

--,_

\

_.,,
/
__;;~

0

Page 3.12

1 MILE

Featherstone Ave. :
· mm

�Figure 3.6
WEEDS, DUMPSTERS, OUTDOOR STORAGE
I

-

-- -

-~ . . . -

. . Clli'iU liiN W

~

.J

Walton Blvd. • •

.,

a~_--a

W

~-'

.

•

J

-=-" ..

j

•

•

~

000$

1'a

•

·~-_a M

~• ,...._ ,,_ -M . . . -

~

--- -

-

-

M

•
••

l

'

&lt;1&gt; 1

,..,
Kennett

,H

Columbia Ave.

l1

.,, , , ,
✓.c.
a.
ca

~

/

/1

~

M-59
J

3
I

Auburn Ave.

I

,::._,,..,
0

1 MILE

--~:::t • - •::i
j

•

ui
.!:
32
C

e

u.

.---;j

..,

1

-:.

J

'

. ._

.

·--.a

I

I

~J
~

fl"

II
~

J
l
II

•a
Page 3.13

�Figure 3.7
VISUAL ASSETS
, a

.- a

a

o,.,u

1a -.;,

a

~....- •

-----®-6-~-@
@

e'--_- - e

~ .tt~ ;W .g

~

Walton Blvd.

...

~

~

~

a.i . . .

i;,,

.. .-

..,_,,..

-.. ,...;; _ • ......,.

Ill

llill

......a

~

(,]@

01 0
Columbia Ave.

Montcalm St.

'l

~

South Blvd.
0

1 MILE

1

..,

.:.J ---•
.

Park and Open Space Areas

0
CD

Page 3.14

Major Visual &amp;sets
(see key on page 3 .15)
Other Visual &amp;sets
(see key on page 3 .15)

.l

.......

... -

'!!11

�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VISUAL ASSET MAP KEY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

SOUTH SAGINAW: 1) Heat Treating Services Corporate Offices, 2) Detroit Ball Bearing
Corporate Office Building, 3) Truck and Bus Group Plant, east facade with landscaping.
PERRY STREET: 1) Walton Square Shopping Center, 2) Wetland, 3) Turtle Creek
Multifamily, 4) Old Oak Square Multifamily, 5) Oakland Catholic High School,
6) Perry Place Apartments, 7) Oakland Technical Center, 8) James Madison Junior High
School, 9) Kinney Shoes/ Foot Locker, 10) Pinewood Apartments, 11) Perry Mowit Park
Cemetery, 12) North Perry Baptist Church, 13) David Ewalt Community Center, 14)
Galloway Park, 15) Open Space.
ORCHARD LAKE ROAD: 1) Open Space, 2) Orchard Woods Apartments,
3) Goldner-Walsh Nursery, 4) Hatchett, DeWalt and Hall Offices, 5) Pontiac Nursing
Center, 6) Mount Hope Cemetery.
AUBURN AVENUE: 1) North Oakland County Community Credit Union, 2) Social
Security Offices, 3) Renaissance Court Apartments, 4) Auburn Hills Townhouse
Apartments, 5) Auburn Professional Center, 6) Huburt Distributors, Incorporated.
OAKLAND AVENUE: 1) Wetland, 2) United Parcel Service, 3) Wimsatt Building
Materials, 4) Oakland Engineering.
EAST HURON: 1) Oak Hill Cemetery, 2) Open Space along Clinton River,
3) Silverdorne.
WEST HURON: 1) Pontiac Central High School, 2) Pontiac General Hospital,
3) Urban League Offices (historic home), 4) YWCA (historic home).
TELEGRAPH ROAD: 1) Oakland County Government Center, 2) Pontiac State Hospital
(open space), 3) Oakland Pointe Shopping Center, 4) Acorn Kitchen and Bath, 5) Rainbow
Plaza, 6) Pizza Hut, 7) Bloomfield-on-the-River Apartments.
UNNERSITY DRNE: 1) Havenwyck Hospital, 2) University Place Apartments,
3) Newman Court Apartments, 4) Medical/ Dental Offices, 5) Wetlands, 6) Wooded Area, 7)
Oak Hill Cemetery, 8) Oak Hill Cemetery, 9) Mobile Gasoline, 10) Palmer Village Cooperative Apartments, 11) Church of Christ.
WALTON BOULEVARD: 1) Open Space, 2) Silver Lake Center, 3) Burger King,
4) Jaycee Park, 5) UAW Local 653 Headquarters, 6) Walton Place Apartments,
7) Auburn Heights Apartments, 8) Oakwood Park Hornes, 9) Colonial Square Apartments,
10) Knob Hill Apartments, 11) Grandville Townhouses, 12) Industrial Building with offices,
13) Michigan Bell Industrial Building, 14) Scott &amp; Sons Speedometer Service, 15) Hillcrest
Church of the Nazarine.

Page 3.15

�Figure 3.8
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXAMPLES of SURVEY FINDINGS
Opposite Page

Figure 3.9
URBAN DESIGN SUGGESTIONS BASED on FIGURE 3.8
Below
1) Eliminate pole siRll to reduce visual
clutter. 2) Enlaf!!e fascia lo accommodate
signs; eliminate high contrast battens to
reduce visual clutter. 3) Remove plywood
fenestration in fill; replace with glass or
reflective spandrel material; utilize low•
contrast mullions; incorporate sign freeze of
mullion material. 4) Paint side of building
to match front. 5) Remove guard rail in
front ynrd locations; replace with bollards or
low masonry WRll. 6) Replace pole sign with
ground sign to reduce Visual clutter. 7)
Deepen fascia to allow room for a s1R11 to lit
cumfortnbly; pamt fascia and other mntenal
an acceptable color. paint other parts of
building an acceptable color that does not
s harply conlTast with trim (see Figure 2.1).
8) Incorporate canopy supports and gas
pumps into one unified structure (see typical
I 991 British Petroleum station design for
example). 9) Remove plywood fenestration
in fill; replace with glass or rellective
spnndrel material with low-contrast
mullions: incorporate sign frieze of mullion
material. 10) Paint entire facade Rn
acceptable color (see Figure 2.1 ). 11)
Eliminate pole sign. 12) Enlarge sign freeze
to accommodate sign. 13) Eliminate
parking in narrow front yards and in rightsof-way. 14) Eliminate false "mansard" front .
15) Reduce fascia signage and replace with
store name in individual letten, placed lo
coordinated with fascia design. 16)
Eliminate window signs and greatly reduce
wnll signs. 17) Eliminate pRrking in narrow
front yards and in rights-of~wRy. 18)
Eliminate front yard parking; replace with
landscaping. 19) Place parking in side yard
behind low masonry screen wall, or in
screened rear yard (see Figure 1.2). 20)
Install low masonry screen wall to shield
parking and vehicular display areas. 21)
Eliminate pole signs and install wallmounted type signs on low masonry screen
wall. 22) Eliminate erratic light poles and
slTeamers; replace with globe lights at
uniform height. 23) Plant trees. 24) Rip
up deteriorated pavement and re-pave. 25)
Relocate newspaper boxes to side of building
to reduce visual clutter, eliminate window
signs. 26) Eliminate portable sign. 27)
Eliminate pole sign. 28) Enlarge fascia to
give sense of architectural solidity.

Page 3.16

��Figure 3.10
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXAMPLES of SURVEY FINDINGS
Opposite Page
Figure 3.11
URBAN DESIGN SUGGESTIONS BASED on FIGURE 3.10
Below
1) Construct masonry screen wall to conceal
vehicles: use iron rail and stile type design
rather than cyclone. 2) Plant trees. 3)
Paint overhead doors to match building to
reduce visual clutter. 4) Remove makeahill;
entrance to reestablish the architectural
integrity of the original structure. 5) Repave front court are.a. 6) Eliminate
"gingerbread" to minimize visual clutter. 7)
Construct masonry screen wall. 8) Plant
trees. 9) Remove plywood siding and
replace with fenestration which carries
through the three-part division of the facade
established by the upper story windows; use
siding and framinl{ to match the onginal
s tructure: paint to match original structure.
10) Construct low masonry wall for sign. 11)
Reduce number of signs and sign
information. 12) Construct high masonry
screen wall to shield vehicles; prohibit
storage in front yard or right-of-way. 13)
Plant trees. 14) Design additions to match
original architecture. if original architecture
is to remain. 15) Eliminate pole sign. 16)
Eliminate pole sign. 17) Construct low
masonry screen wall. 18) Eliminate gable to
reduce visual clutter. replace with sign frieze.
19) Screen dumpster; include well
constructed gate. 20) Eliminate excess wall
signs, ice machines and other equipment.
21) Pince telephone and news stands at side
of building or behind low screen wall. not
free-standing in front of building. 22)
Finish front of building primarily in one
material. preferably a brick W match the
adjacent church. 23) Simplify architectural
overhang. 24) Reduce number of signs.
25) Eliminate window signs. 26) Paint side
of building to match fronL 27) Construct
low masonry screen wall to shield parking.
28) Construct penthouse to screen
mechanical equipment. 29) Install
electrical conduit inside, not on face of
building.

Page 3.18

+---------- ·--··· - - · -- - -

~--------- --------·-

-----.

��Figure 3.12
THE PRINCIPLE of THE SECOND MAN

The "principle of the second man" was first articulated by Edmund Bacon. Mr. Bacon, who
participated in the preparation of this plan, restates the principle here along with the
historic engraving he used to illustrate the principle in his book Design of Cities:
Continuity in the urban environment is essential to good urban design. Freedom of
architectural expression is, when not in the hands of a great artist, destructive of
continuity. It is the second man to participate in any urban design effort who is
most responsible for continuity. He has the power to follow through with already
established design ideas or to work counter to them. This principle is relevant to
Pontiac and to any other city. No where is it more clearly demonstrated than in
the Piazza della Santissima Annunziata in Florence. Here, the great Brunelleschi
designed the arcade of the Foundling Hospital shown at the right in the engraving
above. This elegant arcade established the architectural spirit of the piazza. Over
a period of 89 years, other architects added other facades to the piazza. These
"second men" decided to submerge their own desigk egos in favor of repeating the
theme established by Brunelleschi. The work of Antonio da Sangallo the Elder
opposite Brunelleschi's Foundling Arcade is particularly noteworthy. Although a
talented architect in his own right, Sangallo designed his arcade to be virtually the
same as Brunelleschi's.

Page 3.20

�Chapter4
INDUSTRIAL LAND USE POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses

INTRODUCTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Following this introduction, the chapter is organized into two main sections entitled "Industrial
Land Use Policy Clusters" and "Background Information." There are three policy clusters. Each
policy is stated as the topic sentence of a paragraph. The balance of the paragraph contains data
and analyses which are related to the policy. The three policy clusters are as follows:
Cluster 1: Facilitate Retention of Existing Industrial Facilities and Development of New
Industrial Facilities
Cluster 2: Protect Residential, Retail and Office Areas from the Negative Impacts of
Industrial Facilities
Cluster 3: Protect Residential Areas from the Encroachment of Industrial Facilities
The "Background Information" section points out that Pontiac has no significant industrial
development potential because it has no significant parcels of land which are ready for the
construction of new industrial buildings. It identifies some types of development which the city
could expect to complete if there were adequate parcels available.
Chapter 14 of this plan contains additional industrial land use policies. The policies in Chapter 14
relate particularly to the Future Land Use Map.

INDUSTRIAL LAND USE POLICY CLUSTERS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Industrial Land Use Policy Cluster I:
FACILITATE RETENTION of EXISTING INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
and DEVELOPMENT of NEW INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES

Retain industrial land use designations for major areas now in industrial use. It is
probable that Pontiac will never enjoy the level of industrial employment that it once did.
Notwithstanding, this plan provides for retention of existing industrial areas in industrial use. The
plan does so for two reasons:
1.

Industrial density trends clearly indicate that the industrial facilities of the future will
need more land per employee than industrial facilities of the present or past.

2.

Redevelopment trends nation-wide indicate that large industrial buildings and sites,
including those which are unutilized or marginally utilized, are more likely to be
redeveloped for a relatively high value use, such as manufacturing, than for a relatively
low value use such as housing. Some relatively small industrial buildings can be
retrofitted for housing, office and/or commercial facilities. Pontiac's relatively large
industrial buildings do not appear to be well suited for such retrofitting.

Page 4.1

�Although the above trends support the reasonableness of retaining industrial land use designations,
they do not guarantee the success of that policy. Sometime near the encl of the 1990's the city will
have to evaluate its success in attracting new industrial development to replace existing obsolete
facilities. It may at that time consider alternate policies for obsolete and vacant industrial facilities.

Encourage the reuse or redevelopment of presently underutilization General Motors
facilities and land . .Reuse or redevelopment is necessary to correct a major land use vacuum.
Obsolete General Motors' facilities occupy a very high percentage of Pontiac's total land area. Idle
and probably obsolete facilities include the Pontiac Central Plant on South Boulevard (trucks), the
foundry on Montcalm and the Fiero plant on Baldwin north of Kennett. The Woodward Avenue
plant operates at reduced output. Only the new S-10 plant on Opdyke Road and the parts facility at
Columbia and Joslyn have a utilization expectancy in the foreseeable future. In total, General
Motors has in Pontiac about 20,000,000 square feet of plant space, about half of which is idle.
Nationwide, General Motors is estimated to have about 55,000,000 square feet of idle plant space,
making the idle Pontiac space about 20 percent of its nation-wide total of idle space. Idle and
obsolete General Motors' facilities represent a substantial opportunity cost to the City of Pontiac.
Reuse and redevelopment concepts for General Motors sites on South Boulevard are shown in
Figures 4.2 through 4.5.

Retain long-standing plans to allow redevelopment of residential areas surrounded by the
G.M. north campus. Past plans of the city have envisioned expansion of the General Motors north
campus into strategically located adjacent residential areas. Such expansion could accommodate
General Motors or it could accommodate other industrial firms. First priority should be given to
meeting the needs of the major industrial user in the area, whether that be General Motors or
others. The strategically located residential enclaves are:
1.

northeast of the Montcalm-Baldwin intersection,

2.

south of Columbia and west of Joslyn, and

3.

between the GMC Parts facility and Walton Boulevard.

The area northeast of the Montcalm-Baldwin intersection has experienced some residential
deterioration. The other two areas have experienced less deterioration. Redevelopment of all three
areas is not now necessary based on housing conditions alone. Such redevelopment should occur
only when it is absolutely necessary to facilitate the use of existing industrial sites and/or facilities
by providing room for expansion and or necessary support facilities. Within each area,
redevelopment should occur only by razing the entire ar~a for new industrial uses. Within each
area, industrial uses should not be permitted on individual lots nor on groups of lots if the balance of
the area is to remain residential. Until such time as redevelopment of an entire area is necessary to
facilitate use of the large existing industrial neighbor, the residential integrity of each area should be
preserved. Residential zoning and housing code enforcement policies should be applied with the
same vigor as appropriate to any residential area.
Industrial development trends over the past decade suggest that the "rust belt," including Michigan,
has good potential for attracting major industrial facilities. Even if domestic heavy industries, such
as automobile manufacturing, are downsized, there will still be development of new state-of-the-art
facilities to replace existing obsolete facilities, albeit not at a one-for-one ratio. Furthermore, there
are now few greenfield sites, such as the Orion General Motors site, available in appropriate
locations. Therefore, the General Motors north campus could become a desirable location for a major
new industrial facility. Figures 4.7 and 4.8 compare the size of the north campus to the site
boundaries and industrial plant for two recently constructed General Motors facilities.

Page4.2

�Retain the long-standing plans to allow redevelopment of residential areas north of South
Boulevard between Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard and the Grand Trunk Western belt
line. The area is already predominated by industrial and similar development, including the Fleet
Carrier yard, General Motors employee parking, General Motors storage yards, and the U.S. Army
storage facility. Houses are scattered along Bedford Street, Tex Avenue and Meadow Avenue. Some
of these houses are in substandard or near substandard condition. Redevelopment through city land
assembly would provide a well-located tract of about 175 acres. A redevelopment concept for the
north side of South Boulevard east of Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard is shown in Figure 4.6.

Rezone existing residential areas which are plan designated for future industrial use only
when there is a specific redevelopment plan which eliminates residential uses or protects
remaining residential uses from the negative impacts of industrial development. Where
this plan calls for existing residential areas to be changed to industrial use it does so subject to the
qualification that the change not occur by eating away at the existing residential fabric with one,
then another, then still another small industrial use. Such piecemeal redevelopment would not be
desirable. Until such time as major and comprehensive redevelopment is ripe, the existing
residential areas that are to be redeveloped are to be accorded the full protection of their residential
environment accorded to any other residential area.
Accommodate quality incubator industries and other quality small industrial enterprises
at various locations throughout the city. Many industrial operations start in small, inexpensive
buildings. Many profitable industrial operations remain in such facilities. It is therefore important
to maintain such an inventory. The major industrial firms developing in Oakland County are likely
to generate the need for such incubator and other small scale sites given the Boston and Silcon
Valley experience. Some incubator and other small scale operations should be in areas regulated to
ensure good quality development. Appropriate locations for such facilities include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

the Cass Avenue mini-industrial corridor;
the Howard Street area, including former General Motors facilities;
the Brush Street area south and west of downtown;
the Sheffield strip along the Grand Trunk Western belt line; and
the Featherstone corridor.

Accommodate incubator industries and other marginal industries with reasonable
regulations at locations where their potential to cause blight will do the least harm
possible. Some industrial operations seek the lowest cost sites available, even if such sites are in
unattractive areas. Such operations can be accommodated with reasonable regulations in certain
areas of the city without causing serious blight. The Howard Street industrial area is one possible
location for such uses.

Industrial Land Use Policy Cluster 2:
PROTECT RESIDENTIAL, RETAIL and OFFICE AREAS from the
NEGATIVE IMPACTS of INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
Review and revise as may be necessary the zoning regulations which set industrial on-site
parking and loading standards. These standards have been in place for over ten years. The
Pontiac 2000 Plan identified a need for more rigorous standards. The Planning Division believes
that need still exists based on the experience of the past ten years.

Page4.3

�Review and revise as may be necessary zoning regulations governing site plan review; site
plan review regulations should include discretionary standards-which allow the city
condition approval of industrial site plans upon a discretionary determination that they
incorporate sound site design principles. The princip1es incorporated in discretionary site p1an
review standards should address: 1 ) the internal arrangement of buildings and other site design
elements , and 2) the relationship of site design elements to surrounding land uses and the public
street system. Provision should be made for considering the location of curb cuts and the impact of
future street widening on site layouts.

Review and revise as may be necessary zoning regulations governing building and parking
setbacks for industrial buildings and the width of landscaped buffer strips. In general,
setbacks and landscaped buffer strips should be greater on major thoroughfares which carry heavy
traffic volumes, although more intensive screening and landscaping can serve in lieu of greater
setbacks. Setbacks on thoroughfares which may be widened in the future should be sufficient to
leave a workable site after widening, but they should not be based on an envisioned future right-ofway because to do so might constitute a taking of property without compensation.

Industrial Land Use Policy Cluster 3:
PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS from the
ENCROACHMENT of INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
Do not permit the intrusion of industrial uses into residential areas. The intrusion of
industrial uses into residential areas adjoining to the rear is generally undesirable, but sometimes
necessary in order to accommodate expansion of important employment and tax base assets. Such
intrusion usually manifests itself by construction of parking lots on formerly residential lots. In
Pontiac, the need to expand industrial properties can often be accomplished on adjacent sites
fronting on the same thoroughfare as the use being expanded rather than on adjacent sites to the
rear which front on a local residential street. The Future Land Use map and map policies establish
a Transitional Industrial land use category to allow limited expansion of certain industrial areas
while at the same time protecting adjacent residential areas. Figures 4.9 and 4.10 illustrate how the
Transitional Industrial category can be used.

Do not permit industrial uses in shallow strips along the city's major thoroughfares,
particularly adjacent to residential uses. Many industrial uses have operational characteristics
which are not compatible with the appearance standards to which major thoroughfares should be
held. Problem characteristics often associated with ind~strial uses include unscreened outdoor
storage, unscreened heavy vehicle parking, low quality building design and construction, poor
building maintenance and poor site maintenance. These characteristics are often manifested when
industrial uses are located on shallow strips along thoroughfares. They occur less frequently in
industrial parks and in large site industrial developments.

Do not permit industrial uses in the downtown area. Industrial uses have operational
characteristics which are not compatible with the appearance standards to which the downtown
must be held if it is to be a successful economic and residential hub. Problem characteristics often
associated with industrial uses include unscreened outdoor storage, unscreened heavy vehicle
parking, low quality building design and construction, poor building maintenance and poor site
maintenance.

Page 4.4

�Do not permit industrial development on the Clinton Valley site of the Pontiac State
Hospital; there are other potential uses of that site which would be of greater benefit to the
city. The PHH Fantus Company concluded that the Clinton Valley site is not well located for
industrial uses, primarily because it is relatively far removed from the interstate freeway system.
Despite this fact, it would no doubt be possible to find an industrial user if the land is offered at a
low enough price. Pressure to do so may be strong in the short run because of the limited industrial
land available in the city. This pressure should be avoided, however. The city should seek to
establish the Clinton Valley site as a major residential development, or as a mixed-use development
with a major residential component mixed with some retail and office uses. Such uses will do the
city more good than an industrial use at the Clinton Valley site.

BACKGROUND I N F O R M A T I O N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Pontiac has no significant industrial development potential immediately at hand because
it has no significant sites to accommodate such potential. At the time this plan was prepared,
the Silverdome Industrial Park had only seven acres of vacant land, most of which (four acres) is
best suited for expansion of existing plants. The configuration of Highwood Industrial Park limits its
vacant land to smaller plants. A few small vacant tracts with industrial use potential are scattered
throughout the city's older industrial areas.
The combination of scarce land and a negative image have resulted in Pontiac getting a
very small share of Oakland County growth. The unemployment rate in the city continues to be
about twice that of the County. During the 1984-1988 period, the city experienced only a 6,700
increase in jobs out of the County-wide increase of almost 120,000. The competitiveness of the work
force is a factor. The 1989 Fantus study prepared for this plan suggests that in addition to the land
inventory constraints, the city continues to suffer an image problem when competing with other
suburban Detroit municipalities. This image problem includes high crime rates, poor schools, high
property taxes and the perceived lack of a cohesive, targeted economic development effort.
According to the PHH Fantus study, Pontiac's best potential niche in the industrial and
related market is distribution facilities and the best location is on the east side of the city.
In arriving at this conclusion, PHH Fantus evaluated the following six major economic development
categories:
Headquarters Office Facilities,
Back-Office Facilities,
High-Tech Manufacturing,
Traditional Manufacturing,
Distribution Facilities, and
Retail
PHH Fantus formed the opinion that distribution potential would be strongest on the east side of the
city because that is where access to I-75 is best.

Page4.5

�Figure 4.1
MAJOR INDUSTRIAL AREAS in PONTIAC

Walton Blvd.
S

l3"Ylh..

v~·

' ~ ,j

'I
___

,,~

.,

Central

...

'·-' Foundry
") Division
~
-

.,..

0

~

~

~

~

./i ,.

" .;r'

.

,,,,. / - ~.~11-sn
.7

I.

1

1

~

':l

~

l~--•1

i1

·'"Wl,-

cl-

1 MILE

General Motors
Industrial Parks
Prime Opportunity Areas
Other Opportunity Areas

Page 4.6

.-.

�Figure 4.2
GMC TRUCK and COACH SAGINAW SITE
REDEVELOPMENTCONCEPTl

j
0 feet

1,000 feet

"1" designates existing industrial structures.
"2" designates new industrial structures.
"3" designates new office structures.
"P" designates parking areas.
"L" designates loading areas.

P/L

p

1

L

p

1

L

SOUTH BOULEVARD

Page 4.7

�Figure 4.3
GMC TRUCK and COACH SAGINAW SITE
REDEVELOPMENTCONCEPT2

j
o feat

1,000 feat

"1" designates existing industrial structures.
"2" designates new industrial structures .
"3" designates new office structures.
"P" designates parking areas .
"L" designates loading areas.

7 (

Page 4.8

p

p

3

3

SOUTH BOULEVARD

P/L

�Figure 4.4
INDUSTRIAL REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPT for GMC TRUCK
and COACH SOUTH BOULEYARD SITE: CONCEPT 1

SOUTH BOULEVARD

II

~

4
a

a:

§

3

4

I

I] [D

/.J.J

:5

0

p

QJ

p

t;0~

lill

p

1

L

1

L

1

p

2

p

'1' designates existing industrial structures.
'2' designates new industrial structures.
'3' designates existing office structures.
'4' designates new office structures.
•p• designates parking areas.
'L' designates loading areas.

j
O feet

1,000 feet

Page4.9

�Figure 4.5
INDUSTRIAL REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPT for GMC TRUCK
and COACH SOUTH BOULEYARD SITE: CONCEPT 2
SOUTH BOULE VARD

□

&amp;~3~
1 [
§ 1--------,

Lu

5

0

Q)

c;-

0,

II

~ 8 2j

tJ

I
I

I

I

CTI

I

OJ

I

[nJ

"

I

1

1

I

i

1

I

I

1

II

'-----3

2

'
I
- - - - . . J

1

_L
~

I

I

I

1

1

1

'-

I

DJ

I OJ

1

I

1

I

I

w

1
/

DJ

I

____JI!'--_1__.

L--1

·1 • designates new industrial structures.
·2• designates existing office structures.
•3• designates new office structures.

Page 4.10

j
o feet

1 ,000 feet

�Figure 4.6
INDUSTRIAL REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
for NORTH SIDE of SOUTH BOULEVARD

a

a:
ci::
&gt;
w

w

:)

D:=J

..J

0

co

[I]
[I]

I-

(/)

ci::

w

[I] 0
[I]

[I]

CD

~

dJ Qo

0

0

I 31

3

SOUTH BOULEVARD

1

"l " designates t!Xisting industrial structures.
"2" designates new indust1;aJ structurl!s.
"3" designates new office stn1ctures.

SOUTH BOULEVARD

j
0 feet

1,000 feet

Page4.11

�Figure 4.7
GENERAL MOTORS ORION SITE and PLANT COMPARED to
PONTIAC MOTOR DIVISION and GENERAL MOTORS CENTRAL
FOUNDRY DIVISION SITE (General Motors north campus)
Note: General Motors north campus sites are shown in aerial photography. The General Motors
Orion site is shown by dashed line and the Orion plant is shown in white.

Page 4.12

�Figure 4.8
GENERAL MOTORS CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL PARK (POLETOWN)
SITE and PLANT COMPARED to PONTIAC MOTOR DIVISION and
GENERAL MOTORS CENTRAL FOUNDRY DIVISION SITE
(General Motors north campus)
Note: General Motors north campus sites are shown in aerial photography. The General Motors
Central Industrial Park site is shown by dashed line and the Central Industrial Park plant is shown
in white.

Page4.13

�Figure 4.9
HOWARD STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
Key: 1) Retail/ Office Redevelopment Area; 2) Retail/ Office in Existing Buildings; 3) Transitional
Industrial Redevelopment Area; 4) Industrial Development Area; 5) Industrial Development in
Existing Buildings; 6) Screen Wall and Planting; 7) Redevelopment Area Boundary; 8) Johnson
Street Extended with Landscaping; 9) street closed; 10) Baldwin Avenue; 11) Howard Street. Note:
Transitional Industrial Areas are meant to serve as a buffer between industrial uses and less
intensive uses. Transitional industrial areas may be used for: 1) employee parking, but not heavy
truck maneuvering and parking; 2) offices which serve industrial uses; and 3) indoor storage
facilities and other buildings containing "quiet" uses, provided that no activity is generated on the
sides of buildings facing residential development.

-..

.............•
•
.
..........,............... .......... .
:•
.••••
.
•

.,,...............,,.........•""•"'·""•""'••.,,.•"'•""•""·

·e

·-_

""'.

--.··.

•

: :I
•

-· ·1 •··

....'.1
__.

I
--'

11
.

~--:--i

... -··

LJ

__..

: --•

•

~r:• [!

..•••
•

0

E)
i-·-~

!:·-

j

'

&gt;

LJ
1,--,

~

lc-

J·-

/

V

"

:0

.-,
---'

""

'

'/

✓

,~ni
-~

f~

Page 4.14

i

I :__J

L..-,

�Figure 4.10
PADDOCK STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
Key: 1) Transitional Industrial Redevelopment Area; 2) Industrial Development and/ or
Redevelopment Area; 3) Street Closure; 4) Cul-de-Sac; 5) Redevelopment Area Boundary; 6) Screen
Wall and Planting; 7) Woodward Avenue/ Saginaw Street; 8) South Boulevard; 9) Paddock Street;
10) Irwin Street; 11) Central Avenue. Note: Transitional Industrial Areas are meant to serve as a
buffer between industrial uses and less intensive uses. Transitional industrial areas may be used
for: 1) employee parking, but not heavy truck maneuvering and parking; 2) offices which serve
industrial uses; and 3) indoor storage facilities and other buildings containing "quiet" uses, provided
that no activity is generated on the sides of buildings facing residential development.

"

/&lt; .,,:-- ,.
'
~:,
'
~
, ·'"--. . /
v~
'-

•,.

/

"

,

'•.

0

-~--.
··•·•··•···
'r..9
''
.
J

i

. .: wt

'·--·

' •.

:

-- :1....---------------.....

·················o····-_-·~··o.J.

I ~;

~

~~~

f L:

A~

ooi

0

-, 9 \
\

~

,1.

:'

'

--------------~~~--'-------··-·····-··--·-·-

Page 4.15

�Chapters
THOROUGHFARE and TRANSIT POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses

INTRODUCTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Following this introduction, the chapter is organized into two main sections entitled "Thoroughfare
and Transit Policy Clusters" and "Background Information." There are two thoroughfare and transit
policy clusters. Each policy is stated as the topic sentence of a paragraph. The balance of the
paragraph contains data and analyses which are related to the policy. The two policy clusters are as
follows:
Cluster 1: General Thoroughfare and Transit Policies
Cluster 2: Thoroughfare Improvement Priority Policies
The "Background Information" section notes that, aside from Huron Street in the downtown ,
thoroughfare congestion in Pontiac is now negligible and can be expected to remain so even if the
city's underutilized industrial areas become fully utilized. M-59 presents both problems and
opportunities. The portion of the M-59 route which runs through downtown Pontiac is inadequate
and will remain so even after the necessary Grand Trunk Western underpass is completed. The
"Background Information" also addresses transit. Fixed route and demand-responsive transit
services are observed to be essential modes of transportation for many Pontiac residents. Intercity
passenger rail service is not expected to be available within the foreseeable future.

THOROUGHFARE and TRANSIT POLICY CLUSTERS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Thoroughfare and Transit Policy Cluster 1:
GENERAL THOROUGHFARE and TRANSIT POLICIES

Motorist and pedestrian safety ranks equal with traffic fiow as a goal for street
improvements. Many of the City's most significant safety problems can be redressed with improved
intersection geometrics. Priorities for both types of improvements are identified in policy cluster 2.

Street improvements will be phased in over time because there is a need for more
improvements than Pontiac can finance within the immediate future. Progressing on these
improvements requires decision-makers to reach a consensus on a prioritized and realistic schedule
that matches the limited resources available. If gateway landscaping improvements are to be made,
they will have to be very carefully prioritized along with other street improvements. General
phasing expectations are identified in policy cluster 2. More specific phasing should be done
pursuant to capital improvements programming.

The appearance of Pontiac's most highly traveled streets should be upgraded where
possible through swale and median landscaping. In most urban environments, it is desirable
to use tree plantings and other streetscape improvements to upgrade the appearance of the principal
streets providing access to downtown and other important development areas. Municipal street tree
planting and landscaping programs must compete with other improvement activities for very limited

Page5.1

�funds.
When possible, the city should attempt to heep non-local traffic off local residential streets,
but not expect to keep residential development off non-local streets. Non-local traffic can be
kept off local streets by:

Providing adequate collector and arterial streets,
Traffic management devices such as stop signs and turn restrictions , and
Interrupting the continuity of local streets so that traffic is encouraged to take collectors and
arterials.
It is not usually possible or desirable to permit non-residential development on all major streets in a
city. Most cities simply do not have sufficient demand for commercial land to line all their heavily
traveled thoroughfares with it.

In general, thoroughfare and land use planning should be predicated on functional
thoroughfare classifications; this plan recommends classifications depicted in Figure 5.1.
The functional thoroughfare classifications depicted in Figure 5.1 are defined as follows:
Local Streets: Local streets are intended primarily to provide access to individual parcels of
land. Most streets in the city are local streets. Most local streets serve residential parcels
because there are more residential parcels than non-residential parcels. Local streets also
serve commercial, industrial and institutional development. Local streets are not shown in
Figure 5.1. Many decades ago, 50 feet was considered to be a desirable right-or-way width
for local streets. In the less distant past, 60 feet became the standard. Today, many
planners consider 50 feet to be quite adequate and even preferable to a wider street.
However, in addition to lowering traffic volume or speed, reducing the right-of-way width
may result in reduction or even elimination of: on-street parking and/or sidewalks and/or
trees between curb and sidewalk.
Major Collector Streets: Major collector streets fall in the hierarchy between local streets
and arterial streets. In theory, major collectors funnel traffic from local streets to arterials;
they also carry through traffic, but at lower volumes than major arterials. It is desirable
that major collectors not have to provide access to large numbers of individual lots, but they
are not expected to be free of local access respon~bilities. Major collectors should have rightof-way widths of at least 60 feet.
Major Arterial Streets: Major arterial streets function primarily to move large volumes of
traffic over substantial distances. They are appropriate for journeys through several
neighboring jurisdictions. In an ideal world, major arterials would provide access to very few
individual parcels of land. Major arterials should have right-of-way widths of at least 90
feet, but this is not always possible, particularly in built-up areas where traffic volumes have
increased after development has already occurred close to relatively narrow roads before they
became heavy traffic carriers.
Trunklines: Trunklines are major arterials which carry very large volumes of traffic over
great distances. Trunklines in Pontiac include: 1) M-59; 2) Telegraph Road; and 3) the
Woodward-Saginaw-Wide Track-Oakland route running along a diagonal from the southeast
to the northwest. Trunklines should have right-of-way widths of at least 120 feet.

Page 5.2

�Figure 5.1
PRIORITIZED THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENT
See Figu re 5.3 and 5.4 for unprioritized improvements

Columbia Ave.

Montcalm St.

I'

'\.. --...~

~i
..c.~·

'... " ' ~ •

o,

'

/

~

i..;. ,

i_/

'°":. -~-:~

//

;j-

··• ··· •·•··•·· ·

Huron St.

•• • • •

•

.•·

/

'

.... ~

j

/

'

~

.

l

.

v•: Li-- ~,._., ~

Elizabeth Lake Ad .• '

j_r

!

Featherstone Ave. :

~

M-59

~.;,,--------➔•---Auburn Ave.

····················
..................••
•
, .... , _ _ _ _ _ \""4

m

-5
:,

...J

..... - .- - ...
0

1 MILE

...

. :, .---------- .•
,

1

Thoroughfare Improvement ~
First Priority ( 1990-2000)

Ie I

•

South Blvd .

ui
C:

32

.,,

C:

(1)

i.t

Grade Separation
First Priority ( 1990-2000)

,. ._ ...

Intersection Improvement
First Priority (1990-2000)

Boulevard and/ or Side Landscaping
First Priority ( 1990-2000)

1 .a
Thoroughfare Improvement
Second Priority ( 1995-2000)

Thoroughfare Improvement

4

r--•

0-"---&lt;'0

Third Priority (All.er 2000)

Page5.3

�Figure 5.2
THOROUGHFARE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

()1--,- - 0

"'O

a:

Walton Blvd.

(I)

Ol

C

i5

ai

"'O

&gt;

~ -----....;;&lt;t:*_.;c;,;;o;,;,;lu;.;,m;,;;b;;i;,a.;.A;,;v,;;e;...- • • • - - - ai

0

&gt;

&lt;(
C

&gt;,

vi
0

-,

Montcalm St.

-d

a:

..c
a.

~

•j

~

Ol
Q)

~

M-59

Elizabeth lake Ad.

I

j

Huron St.

l

Auburn Ave.
&gt;

-:----.l

ffi
Ol
C

'i2

·----

~

&lt;ii

..c

:5

....J
C

't

"'

~

0

1 MILE

iii

South Blvd.

\

,£;

32
C

~

u..
1 ... - - -

1'•--••A

Freeway: right-of-way 250 feet
Trunklines: right-of-way 120 to 250 feet
Major Arterial: right-of-way 90 to 150 feet
Major Collector: right-of-way 60 to 150 feet
Note: Roads not shown on this map are classified local.

;~.!I
i

l

1,.... 1

4

. ,-

'

I

]~
~~

Page 5.4

~-- .•
.... J
l

10

�Freeways: Freeways are limited access arterials. Their principal function is to carry large
volumes of traffic over great distance at relatively high speeds. ~By definition and design they
provide no direct access to individual parcels of land.

Thoroughfare and Transit Policy Cluster 2:
THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENT PRIORITY POLICIES
The thoroughfare improvement priority policies set forth below are detailed and specific responses to
land use and thoroughfare planning needs as perceived at the time of plan adoption. The
categorization of specific projects as first, second or third priority reflects available data, analysis
and judgment. These first, second and third priority rankings are subject to refinement and
modification pursuant to the six-year capital improvements programming process recommended
elsewhere in this plan. The numbering of projects within first, second and third priority
categorizations is for convenience; no particular sub-prioritization is intended by this numbering.

First Priority Projects, 1990-1995
1.

Huron Street Railroad Crossing:
Issue: Some 40,000 vehicles per day cross the railroad tracks at grade on the western edge
of downtown, major congestion and delays result. The situation will be much worse when
M-59 begins to carry traffic generated by the Oakland Technology Park. A 1988 study by
the Michigan Department of Transportation projected future traffic volumes at 50,000
vehicles per day and indicated the need for a grade separation.
Opportunity: A grade separation is needed to keep M-59 traffic from coming to a standstill.
The underpass should be of sufficient dimension to accommodate a widened West Huron
Street roadway between at least West Wide Track Drive and State Street. Relocation ofM59 would provide an alternate for M-59 traffic, but would still leave the problems for local
traffic.

2.

West Huron:
Issue: West Huron is a downtown gateway to very high traffic volumes. It will become
even more important if the M-59 route continues to run through downtown, which seems
most probable.
Opportunity: Implement tree planting and other streetscape improvements. Incorporate a
boulevard configuration, if possible.

3.

M-59 Relocation Downtown:
Issue: The current M-59 route through downtown is five lanes. The current west-bound M59 route through downtown is made difficult by turns at University and Mill and at Mill
and Huron. The situation will be much worse when M-59 begins to carry traffic generated
by the Oakland Technology Park. A 1988 study by the Michigan Department of
Transportation (MDT) indicated that average daily traffic volumes would increase from the
current 28,000 to 39,000 range to a projected 40,000 to 50,000 range. Thus thoroughfare
level-of-service could drop from the E range to the F range. Peak hours could see grid-lock
conditions. The MDT report did not pose any solutions; it instead indicated the need to
study potential improvements.
Opportunity: Extend westbound M-59 from University Drive south to connect to Huron,

Page 5.5

�preferably east of the Furlong Building or at the Furlong Building site if good highway
geometrics make this necessary.
4.

State Street:

Issue: State Street relieves West Huron Street of downtown and M-59 traffic because it
feeds the newly widened Elizabeth Lake Road. Therefore, widening is recommended,
particularly ifno major improvement to M-59 is envisioned.
Opportunity: Widen to five lanes and provide landscape median.
5.

Baldwin Avenue:

Issue: Baldwin carries over 20,000 vehicles per day north of Walton. The planned
2,300,000 square foot discount mall will substantially increase volumes. Baldwin now has
two lanes south of Columbia and four lanes north of Columbia.
Opportunity: Widen to five lanes north of Walton Boulevard.
6.

Orchard Lake Road:

Issue: Orchard Lake carries over 10,000 vehicles per day. It is an important connection
between Telegraph Road and downtown. As a downtown gateway from an important
market area, it could be given priority consideration for tree planting and other streetscape
improvements. Orchard Lake now has two lanes.
Opportunity: Widen to four lanes with turning lane. Implement tree planting and other
boulevard streetscape improvements. Reconstruct Railroad overpass with preservation of
portion of historic structure, if possible. As of the date of adoption of this plan, these
Orchard Lake Road improvements were included in the city's capital improvement
program.
7.

Auburn Avenue Streetscape:

Issue: Auburn is a downtown gateway from I-75; it could be given priority consideration for
tree planting and other streetscape improvements.
Opportunity: Implement tree planting and other streetscape improvements east of Wide
Track Drive.
\

8.

Intersection Improvements:

Issue: At least five intersections that will not be impacted by other projects listed herein,
warrant additional turn lane capacity to further both safety and capacity objectives. The
five intersections are: Wide Track Drive and Orchard Lake Road; Wide Track Drive and
Oakland Avenue; South Boulevard and Franklin; Baldwin and Montcalm; and Telegraph
and Voorheis.
Opportunity: Make intersection improvements.

Page5.6

�Second Priority Projects, 1995-2000
1.

Connect Franklin Road with Bagley north of Rapid:

Issue: Franklin can provide better access to the west side of downtown with this
improvement. Orchard Lake Road provides an alternative.
Opportunity: Connect Franklin Road with Bagley north of Rapid.
2.

Montcalm Widening between Perry and Joslyn:
Issue: Currently this short segment is only two lanes. It connects with four-lane segments
to the west and south. It creates a bottleneck at this time. It will be a more serious
bottleneck if employment increases at the General Motors north campus.
Opportunity: Widen this short segment of Montcalm to five lanes including a center leftturn lane.
Opportunity: Extend Telegraph.

3.

Franklin Road Widening:
Issue: Franklin provides a direct access to downtown from Telegraph Road. Widening from
two to four lanes would improve downtown accessibility, though with some cost in
environmental quality to the adjacent neighborhood. This neighborhood is the focus of a
revitalization effort through Neighborhood Housing Services Program. Orchard Lake Road
provides an alternative.
Opportunity: Widen Franklin Road. Also, the segment of Rapid Street which links
Franklin to Saginaw should be upgraded.

4.

Oakland Avenue Turn Lane Construction:
Issue: Oakland Avenue is four lanes north of Montcalm, but lacks turn lanes thus reducing
the efficiency of traffic flows.
Opportunity: Improve Oakland Avenue north of Montcalm with turn lanes.

5.

University Drive:
Issue: University carries over 10,000 vehicles per day in the vicinity of Martin Luther
King, Jr. Boulevard. It provides access to the Silverdome and Auburn Hills. University
now has two lanes.
Opportunity: Widen to five lanes from Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard to city limits. As
an option, include a boulevard to match that in Auburn Hills east of I-75.

Page5.7

�Third Priority Projects, after 2000
1.

Telegraph Road Extension:
Issue: Currently a 3,500 foot segment of this road is missing between Oakland Avenue and
a point on the edge of Hawthorne Park, south of Walton Boulevard. This connection would
relieve traffic pressure on other streets serving the northern Pontiac industrial commuters.
Construction of a one-block segment at the northern city boundary would also complete the
direct connection to I-75 and the new shopping center.
Opportunity: Construct new 3,500 foot segment of Telegraph between Oakland Avenue
and Walton Boulevard.

2.

Golf Drive Widening:
Issue: Currently Golf Drive is a two-lane roadway. Widening to four lanes is important at
such time as there is greater employment at either of the General Motors South Boulevard
facilities.
Opportunity: Widen Golf Drive to four lanes.

3.

Johnson Avenue Railroad Crossing and Johnson Avenue Extension and
Improvements from Grand Trunk Western Railroad to Bald win:
Issue: The Johnson Avenue grade crossing is a bottleneck in the Montcalm-CassElizabeth Lake connection between the northern and western parts of the city. The north
and central parts of the City could be better linked to areas to the west by improving the
Johnson Avenue railroad crossing and by extending Johnson Avenue to connect with
Baldwin Avenue. Improvements should also be made to existing portions of Johnson
Avenue east of the railroad.
Opportunity: Make grade crossing improvements; extend and widen Johnson Avenue to
provide for two-way traffic. Consideration should be given to second priority designation
for these improvements at such time as major employment increases occur at the General
Motors North Campus.

4.

Kennett Road:
Issue: Kennett carries over 10,000 vehicles per day between the northern GM plant area
and the Oakland Avenue-Route 10 intersectioJ. There is no alternative route for this
desired line. Kennett has two lanes.
Opportunity: Widen to three lanes, including a center left turn lane.

5.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard Widening:
Issue: Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard carries over 10,000 vehicles per day, but also has
mostly residential frontage. Widening could have a negative impact on the adjacent
homes. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard is potentially an attractive corridor through
which to bring traffic. Opdyke Road and other thoroughfares will provide optional routes.
Opportunity: Widen to five lanes including a center left-tum lane. Alternatively, consider
providing a marginal access road for those residences along one side of Martin Luther
King, Jr. Boulevard. This improvement would require the acquisition and clearance of the

Page5.8

�existing homes on one side of the street and consequently, may be undesirable for the
neighborhood. Similar concerns apply to the less beneficial concept of providing a
landscaped median between the north and south bound lanes.

Other Potential Projects Identified but not Prioritized for the Immediately Foreseeable
Future
Although these projects have not yet been prioritized for the immediately foreseeable future, one or
more of them may indeed be desirable or even necessary in the very near future. They are included
here to keep them before the public eye and as a reminder that they merit periodic consideration for
inclusion among prioritized projects.
1.

Railroad Right-of-Way Modifications:
Issue: There is a severe conflict between the vehicular traffic on M-59 and the train traffic
on the Grand Trunk Western Railroad line which crosses M-59 just west of Wide Track
Drive West. Up to 40 trains per day are reported on the railroad. Many are very long and
slow moving. Some 40,000 vehicles per day cross the railroad at grade on the western edge
of downtown, major congestion and delays result. The situation will be much worse when
M-59 begins to carry traffic generated by the Oakland Technology Park. A 1988 study by
the Michigan Department of Transportation projected future traffic volumes at 50,000
vehicles per day and indicated the need for a grade separation. However, the grade
separation, indicated as a first priority project in this plan, is at least several years from
completion. Indeed, construction most likely will not commence until 1993. When
construction does begin, the construction process itself will likely entail serious traffic
congestion lasting for several years. Many businesses will be forced to relocate. Finally,
the grade separation W1ll leave many other conflicts between railroad and vehicular traffic.
Opportunity: As a possible alternate to the proposed grade separation, consideration could
be given to re-routing Grand Trunk through Pontiac so as to bypass the downtown area. A
proposed re-routing is shown in Figure 5.3. This proposed re-routing would relieve the
conflict between trains and motor vehicles on South Saginaw as well as on M-59. The reroute would start at the existing route near the south city limits. It would cross through
the parking lot of the closed Pontiac Truck and Buss plant on South Boulevard east of
Saginaw. It would utilize the closed grade-separated crossing over South Boulevard and
the functioning grade-separated over M-59 near the Silverdome. The feasibility of the rerouting depends on General Motors intentions for the parking lot through which the route
would have to pass. It also depends on General Motors intentions for the Truck and Bus
plant on South Boulevard west of Saginaw; this plant, which is scheduled to close soon,
could not be served by the proposed re-routing. In addition to the intentions of General
Motors, other factors would have to be assessed. A detailed engineering study will be
required.

2.

Voorheis Road:
Issue: The segment between Orchard Lake Road and Telegraph Road is a connector. But
less than 10,000 vehicles per day use it and widening to four lanes would impact the
quality housing along its frontage.
Opportunity: Widening should be programmed only if necessary to relieve acute problems
on Huron or other streets.

Page 5.9

�3.

Paddock Street:
Issue: Paddock provides a north-south connection between Perry Street and South
Boulevard. However, like Voorheis, most of its frontage is residential. The neighborhood
is in need of revitalization; a four-lane connector would not help this effort.
Opportunity: Widen to four lanes only if congestion on Wide Track and Martin Luther
King, Jr. Boulevard become acute.

4.

Collier Road:
Issue: As the adjacent industrial park develops, Collier will be an important alternate
connection to I-75 and the northern suburbs.
Opportunity: Widen to four lanes if necessary.

5.

M-59 One-Way Couple in Downtown:
Issue: The current M-59 route through downtown is five lanes. The current west-bound M59 route through downtown is made difficult by turns at University and Mill and at Mill
and Huron. The situation will be much worse when M-59 begins to carry traffic generated
by the Oakland Technology Park. A 1988 study by the Michigan Department of
Transportation (MDT) indicated that average daily traffic volumes would increase from the
current 28,000 to 39,000 range to a projected 40,000 to 50,000 range. Thus thoroughfare
level-of-service could drop from the E range to the F range. Peak hours could see grid-lock
conditions. The MDT report did not pose any solutions; it instead indicated the need to
study potential improvements.
Opportunity: M-59 could be realigned within downtown Pontiac by extending University
north to align with Carter and by extending Carter to join West Huron just east of West
Wide Track Drive. Building demolition would be required, but downtown Pontiac would be
better off without at least some of the buildings in the path of this route. The improvement
would link directly to the proposed grade separation at West Huron and the railroad.

6.

South Saginaw Street:
Issue: South Saginaw Street between Wide Track Drive and South Boulevard does not
provide the landscape median which otherwise is provided beyond (south) South
Boulevard. Additionally, most of the existing development along South Saginaw Street
between Wide Track Drive and Wilson Street i~ marginal, inappropriate or a blight on the
streetscape.
Opportunity: Consider acquisition and clearance of properties along South Saginaw Street
between Wide Track Drive and South Boulevard, as necessary to remove marginal or
inappropriate development and blight, and to provide the additional right-of-way required
to facilitate continuation of the landscape median separating northbound and southbound
traffic on South Saginaw Street.

Page 5.10

�Figure 5.3
ALTERNATE RAILROAD ROUTE to BYPASS DOWNTOWN
1 ,. .... •

~ ~

ca

r~

~

•

:Ql

o

a.

~ •

&gt;l!I ~'""'

•

..i

a Mi""'- a...

11:.1 . . -

w au ~•a..,...~ m a

i:.-"

-ci i
a: :::

Walton Blvd.
1
j

I

.

Columbia Ave.

.

~

J

.r•

~

.,

~~-

✓

-------~¥
Montcalm St.

.,.,.;......._

ve.

.

Huron St.

0

1 MILE

Existing Route

J

Alternatie Route

Page 5.11

�Figure 5.4
OTHER UNSCHEDULED THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS _·
◄ -

-

M

0~

.,- ~ - fiill ~ N W . . . _ . . . . 6'-.:..

I

0'la ~

--

;a e;a -

-

-

-

M

~ - ....

~ ..

1"'

Walton Blvd.
l

✓-

/

A

j

·,

Kennett

Columbia Ave.

1
J

~

j
j
I

Montcalm St.

J

•

Ave.

Huron St.

0

1 MILE

Highly Desirable Thoroughfare Improvement
Needed to Support Industrial Development

f........,

Boulevard and/ or Side Landscaping

;.2•-

Thoroughfare Improvement to be Made Only if
Absolutely Necessary to Serve Increased Traffic

...

--

,l

Page 5.12
- -.,1 1

•

�7.

South Boulevard:

Issue: South Boulevard, east of Franklin Road to Opdyke Road does not provide the
landscape median which is provided west of Franklin Road. As a major entryway from
Auburn Hills, the aesthetic condition of South Boulevard is a significant image factor.
Opportunity: Enhance the appearance of the South Boulevard streetscape by providing a
landscape median from Franklin Road to Opdyke Road.
Previously Considered Project which should not be Considered in Future Planning
1.

Montcalm Street Extension:

Issue: Montcalm Street attempts to accommodate the flow between the northern GM plant
and the vicinity of the Telegraph Road-Elizabeth Lake Road intersection. Traffic must
now use a circuitous route via Cass Street and the Johnson Avenue railroad grade crossing.
An extension of Montcalm to Telegraph would provide a much better route with the added
benefit of facilitating private development of the Clinton Valley site. A bridge over the
railroad would be necessary. It would be best if the proposed extension ran along the north
side of the Clinton Valley site.
Unrealistic and Improbable Opportunity: A 1970 Harley Ellington Associates engineering
feasibility study considered the feasibility of re-routing of M-59 along Martin Luther King,
Jr. Boulevard and Montcalm across a Montcalm Extension over the railroad. This concept
requires extensive right-of-way acquisition along Montcalm. It would bring more traffic
past the Clinton Valley site thus facilitating private development. It would divert traffic
from the downtown. It would present M-59 alignment problems west of Telegraph,
problems arising from the development which has occurred in the 20 years since 1970. The
Michigan Department of Transportation 1988 M-59 study observed that the environmental
problems associated with lakes and residential development make M-59 alignment changes
west of Telegraph very problematic. This opportunity is so improbable that it should not be
part of future planning. No project or development opportunity should be put on hold with
the expectation that this improbable opportunity might come to fruition.
Unrealistic and Improbable Opportunity: As an alternate, consideration could be given to a
link between Wide Track and Montcalm. Such a link could utilize the proposed Montcalm
Extension overpass then follow Cass eastbound and Oakland westbound. Or, it could
follow the current route within Wide Track Drive and utilize the drainage right-of-way just
west of the railroad. This route concept is a variation of a 1967 Barton-Aschman plan
prepared for the city. It would keep M-59 traffic in the downtown area thus facilitating
revitalization. The need to widen Montcalm and/or State would be reduced, i.e. avoid the
adverse frontage impact thereon. This opportunity is so improbable that it should not be
part of future planning. No project or development opportunity should be put on hold with
the expectation that this improbable opportunity might come to fruition.

BACKGROUND I N F O R M A T I O N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Oakland Technology Park will have a major impact on Pontiac because of the M-59 link
between the city and the Technology Park. Oakland Technology Park will have a thousand acres
of office and technological facilities. It is estimated that total build-out will result in a work force of

Page 5.13

�G0,000 employees. Since Chrysler Corporation announced plans to develop almost 500 acres in the
park as their research headquarters. the area has rapidly developed. Hotels are being planned, as
well as corporate offices for businesses which work closely with or supply products to Chrysler. In
addition, some of the national firms with offices in the park are: the GM/UAW training
headquarters, GMF Robotics, EDF Computers, World Computers, l'IT, and Comerica Data Center.
The Oakland Technology Park is a major component in showcasing Michigan's ability to attract new
technology development as part of the "Greater Detroit-World Technology Center."

M-59 is the most important thoroughfare problem and opportunity facing Pontiac; this is
so because of the important residential and business areas to which it links the city.
Significant areas linked to Pontiac by M-59 are:
Northwestern Oakland County,
Auburn Hills,
Rochester Hills,
The Silverdome
Oakland University (10,300 students),
Auburn Hills Campus of Oakland Community College (9,000 students), and
Oakland Technology Park.

M-59 route through downtown Pontiac is inadequate and will remain so even a~er the
necessary Grand Trunk Western underpass is completed. The situation will be much worse
when M-59 begins to carry traffic generated by the Oakland Technology Park. A 1988 study by the
Michigan Department of Transportation (MDT) indicated that average daily traffic volumes would
increase from the current 28,000 to 39,000 range to a projected 40,000 to 50,000 range. Thus
thoroughfare level-of-service could drop from the E range to the F range. In the E range, traffic
volumes are at or near capacity and significant delays are common. In the F range, speeds are
extremely slow and actual stoppages are common; peak hours can see grid-lock or near grid-lock
conditions. (A complete description of roadway levels-of-service from A to F is given in Table 5-2 on
page 5.18.) The MDT report did not pose any solutions; it instead indicated the need to study
potential improvements.

Over the past two decades, four potential solutions to the M-59 question have been
identified. These four solutions are as follows:
1. M-59 could be realigned within downtown Pontiac by extending University south to align

with Huron west of State. Possibly the connechon could be made east of the Furlong
Building, which is an architectural asset. If the Furlong Building is not required to make
the connection between University and Huron, then only two buildings of very limited
value would have to be demolished. It would be better to make the link than not make the
link, even if the site of the Furlong Building is required, provided there is no other
economically feasible way to improve traffic. Linking University with Huron will allow
westbound M-59 traffic to move as smoothly as possible through downtown thereby
keeping economic development there highly visible.
2. M-59 could be realigned within downtown Pontiac by extending University north to align
with Carter and by extending Carter across Wide Track and the Grand Trunk Western
Railroad to rejoin West Huron west of State. Substantial building demolition would be
required. The cost could well be prohibitive.
3. A 1970 Harley Ellington Associates engineering feasibility study considered the feasibility

Page 5.14

•
•
•
•
•
"•

II
II
II

•11
11

�of re-routing ofM-59 along Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard and Montcalm across a
Montcalm Extension over the railroad. This concept requires extensive right-of-way
acquisition along Montcalm. It would bring more traffic past the Clinton Valley site thus
facilitating private development. It would divert traffic from the downtown. It would
present M-59 alignment problems west of Telegraph, problems arising from the
development which has occurred in the 20 years since 1970. The Michigan Department of
Transportation 1988 M-59 study observed that the environmental problems associated
with lakes and residential development make M-59 alignment changes west of Telegraph
very problematic.
4. As an alternate, consideration could be given to a link between Wide TracK and the
Montcalm Extension. Such a link could utilize the proposed Montcalm Extension overpass
then follow Cass eastbound and Oakland westbound. Or, it could follow the current route
within Wide Track Drive and utilize the drainage right-of-way just west of the railroad.
This route concept is a variation of a 1967 Barton-Aschman plan prepared for the city. It
would keep M-59 traffic in the downtown area thus facilitating revitalization. The need to
widen Montcalm and/or State would be reduced, i.e. avoid the adverse frontage impact
thereon.

Aside from Huron Street downtown, thoroughfare congestion in Pontiac is negligible
compared to rapidly growing areas of the country. Table 5-1 shows the lane widths, daily
traffic volumes and level-of-service for the major streets in Pontiac. Only five streets are shown to
have level-of-service problems. Walton Boulevard improvements have already been completed, thus
correcting one of the five problem streets. Plans are in place to improve three of the other four
problem streets. The problem streets and the completed improvement and plans which apply to each
are as follows:

•

Huron Street in the downtown: Huron street in the downtown will remain a problem even
after the planned nnderpass is constructed at the Grand Trnnk Western railroad route.

•

Huron Street west of downtown: Since the 1987 volume connt shown in Table 5-1 was
taken, Elizabeth Lake Road has been widened to provide a relief route to Huron plus better
direct access to the Clinton Valley tract. The proposed widening of State Street would
enhance this role of Elizabeth Lake Road as a relief route. If the combined volumes on
Huron and Elizabeth Lake (56,000 ADT) were evenly divided between the two roads, each
would have an LOS of B. Such an even split may be rm likely, but it is certain that the
improvements to State Street and Elizabeth Lake Road will reduce traffic volumes on
Huron below what they would otherwise have been.

•

Walton Boulevard: The widening to five lanes including a center turn lane was completed
in 1991. This street should now have a Level-of-Service of A/Bas shown in the table. The
1990 widening of Kennett Road is intended to provide some relief to western Walton.

•

Baldwin Avenue north of Walton: This two-lane segment (LOS of E) is about to be widened
to five lanes including a center turn lane as a second phase of the Walton project and also
prompted by the planned shopping mall it will serve.

•

Montcalm Street (Joslyn-Perry link): This short link to Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard
and Perry Street is now LOS D since it has only two through traffic lanes.

•

Orchard Lake Road (east of Voorheis): This two-lane segment is slated for widening during
the 1990-1995 period.

Page 5.15

�Any level of future use that can readily be envisioned for Pontiac 's major industrial areas
would still leave very strong thoroughfare levels of service. T woliypothetical cases
demonstrate this fact:

J oslyn Avenue: If you assume the GMC Parts building were to be converted entirely for
manufacturing operations, using the Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation
rate (3.8 trips per 1,000 square feet) , the 6,840 additional cars per day could be
accommodated on Joslyn and still maintain an LOS of B. This would be true even if it were
entirely warehousing which has a slightly higher trip generation rate.
South Boulevard: If two new manufacturing buildings the size of the U.S. Army building
were constructed and the Army facility was converted to manufacturing, the additional trips
on South Boulevard (4,000 vehicles per day in each direction ) again would still provide an
LOS ofB.
Fixed route and demand-responsive transit services are essential modes of transportation
for many Pontiac residents. More than half the City's residential areas have an above average
concentration of transit-dependent residents. Significant parts of the city have very much above
average concentrations. Transit dependency is directly related to household size, the number of
people over 60 years of age and the number of people nnder 18 years of age; it is inversely related to
per-capita income and motor vehicle ownership. In Pontiac, fixed route and demand-responsive
transit service is provided by Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART).

It will be many years into the future before passenger rail service provides a very strong
link from Pontiac to downtown Detroit and the suburban communities in between. As of
1990, the history of passenger rail service in Pontiac has been very limited. The distant potential for
passenger rail service is not likely to play a major role in any important development decisions.

Page 5.16

•
•

�Table 5-1
ROADWAY LEVEL-of-SERVICE on MAJOR STREETS

Street

Traffic#
of Lanes

Left Turn
Lanes

Roadway
Width

Average Daily
Traffic Volumes

Level of
Service

4

No

46

13,176

A

2
4
2

Yes
Yes
No

36
58
22

8,003*
21,330
18,979

A
B
E

4
4
4
2
4

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

63
60
63-75
26-30
68

20,732*
17,531
6,909*
8,863
39,109

B
A
A
A
E

4

4

Yes
One-way
Yes
Yes
Ltd. Access

60
32
60-63
40
48

NA
NA
17,358*
10,748*
39,494

A
B
B

2
4

Yes
No

44
44-68

15,283*
18,467*

D
A

4
3
4

No
Yes
Yes

44

21,976
23,036
23,644

B
C
B

4
2
4

No
Yes
Yes

45
36
44-72

11,012*
16,340*
23,461

A
E

4
2
2

Yes
No
Yes

68
22-38
36

14,982
8,620
NA

A
A

2
4
2

Yes
One-way
No

36-48
40
28

12,457
NA
5,887*

B
A

6
4

Yes
Yes

59
44-60

44,200*
17,048

B
A

2
4
3-6
6

No
Yes
One-way
Yes

22
58
50-72
88

18,239-23,090*
NA
17,600-22,900*
39,013

Auburn Ave.
Baldwin Ave.:
S. of Montcalm
Montcalm-Walton
N. of Walton
Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd.
(N. of Elm)
Elizabeth Lake Rd.
Featherstone Ave.
Franklin Rd.
Huron St.
Johnson:
west of railroad
east of railroad
Joslyn Ave.
Kennett Rd.
M-59 Expressway
Montcalm St.:
Joslyn-Perry
west of Joslyn
Oakland Ave.:
north of Montcalm
south of Montcalm
Opdyke Rd.
Orchard Lake Rd.:
west of Voorheis
east of Voorheis
Perry St.
South BlvdJGolfView Dr.:
east of Franklin
west of Franklin
State St.
University Dr.:
east of Expressway Inter.
west of Expressway Inter.
Voorheis
Telegraph Rd.:
south of Elizabeth Lake
north of Elizabeth Lake
Walton Blvd.:
1990
1991
Wide Track Rd.
Woodward

2
4

2

60
63

B

E

NB
B!C

B

NA- Traffic volumes not available.
* Pre-1987 count; all other counts 1987-1989.
Source of traffic volumes: Oakland County Division of Planning 1988 and 1990 maps.

Page5.17

�Table 5-2
.
GENERAL CAPACITY of ROADWAYS by DESIGN TYPE and LEVEL-of-SERVICE

Roadway
Design Type
2L
3L
4LU
4LD
6LD
6LD+FR
4LX
6LX
8LX
l0LX

LOS
A

LOS
B

LOS
C

LOS
D

LOS
E

9,800
14,900
16,900
22,500
34,800
46,400
47,500
71,000
95,000
120,300

11,500
17,300
20,000
26,300
40,600
54,200
55,700
83,600
111,400
139,300

13,100
19,700
22,700
30,000
46,400
61,800
63,300
95,000
126,600
158,300

15,700
23,600
27,200
36,000
55,800
74,200
75,900
114,000
152,200
190,000

17,400
26,200
30,300
40,000
61,900
82,400
84,400
126,700
169,000
209,000

Roadway levels-of-service are defined as follows:
LOSA:

Low volumes of traffic flowing freely at high speeds with little restriction on
maneuverability.

LOSB:

Reasonably unimpeded traffic flow at average traffic speeds. Maneuvering is
slightly restricted, with only occasional stopped delays.

LOSC:

Higher traffic volumes associated with those of urban-area roads. Traffic flows
are stable, although lower average traffic speeds prevail and occasional backups
may develop.

LOSD:

High traffic volumes and poor signal progression and timing lead to unstable
flows. Substantial decrease in operating speed, maneuverability, convenience
and comfort may be experienced.

LOSE:

Traffic volumes at or near roadway capacity. Significant delays are common and
flows very unstable.

LOSF:

Traffic speeds are extremely slow anJ actual stoppages are common. Long delays
are expected with drivers having to wait through more than two cycles of a traffic
signal.

The level of service appropriate for a particular thoroughfare can be determined by the governing
body based on the perceived need for development and the ability to finance thoroughfare
improvements. A peak-hour level-of-service D is acceptable in most situations. A peak hour level-ofservice E may be appropriate under certain circumstances; F may be unavoidable where
development intensities are very high and there is not much potential for street widening.

Page 5.18

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

II
II
II
II

•Ill
•

�Chapter6
PARK and RECREATION POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses

INTRODUCTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Following this introduction, the chapter is organized into two main sections entitled "Park and
Recreation Policies" and "Background Information."
Each policy is stated as the topic sentence of a paragraph. The balance of the paragraph contains
data and analyses which are related to the policy. The policies place emphasis on the need to scale
back on park costs while providing the most important facilities and services. They also emphasize
the need for public involvement in the process of setting priorities.
The "Background Information" section explains that communities provide park facilities in
accordance with the electorate's desires and ability to pay, not according to national or regional
"standards," although national and state-wide standards are often cited in recreation facility
planning. When compared with national standards or with other southeast Michigan communities,
Pontiac's parks are found to be quite adequate in size and number. The "Background Information"
section reviews other issues relevant to park and recreation planning in Pontiac.

PARK and RECREATION POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
The park and recreation policies set forth below are intended to offer general direction. Detailed
policies should be the work of the Pontiac Park and Recreation Commission and should be expressed
in the specific plans of that body.
Activate the Pontiac Park and Recreation Commission to provide citizen involvement in
the difficult process of setting park and recreation priorities. The Pontiac Park and
Recreation Commission has been inactive during recent years. Michigan law envisions an active
Park and Recreation Commission to provide citizen involvement in the setting of park and recreation
priorities. Such citizen involvement aids sound local government administration.

Deal with severe budgetary constraints by employing a broad range of strategies, including
reducing facilities and services, imposing user fees and implementing innovative
management approaches. The Community and Human Services Department envisions these
strategies as including the following tactics:

Reduce Facilities and Services
Reduce the size and number of parks,
Reduce the number of facilities ,
Reduce recreation programs.

Page 6.1

�Impose User Fees on Specific Facilities and Services
Sled and special equipment fees,
Court fees for individuals,
Court fees for leagues,
Sports field fees for leagues,
Other fees.

Innovative Design and Management Programs
Remodel parks to the extent feasible to increase natural areas and reduce areas that require
high maintenance;
Provide only those services which can be most efficiently delivered to the broadest range of
park and recreation user;
Contract services to get the lowest possible cost;
Coordinate leisure services for greater efficiency;
Organize an Adopt-a-Park Program to involve the public in park maintenance;
Mobilize the public in People Security Patrols equipped with mini bikes and walkie talkies;
Mobilize the public, including special groups to provide program delivery;
Catalog marketing; and
Mobilize volunteer groups in fund raising.
Some of these strategies and tactics have been employed during the past five years with success. For
example, since 1985 the Community and Human Services Department has been able to use
innovative programs to increase program activities forward while reducing the budget by 27 percent.

Employ careful 'cutback management' to selectively trim operations and facilities in a way
that allows the city to deliver the most effective range of recreation facilities and services
at whatever cost the budget can afford. An important 1984 study by Gerald Luedtke and
Associates for the Pontiac Community and Human Services Department described the cutback
management strategy and associated tactics in detail. In the initial phases, cutback management
may only involve elimination of nonessential expenditures. In its more radical form, cutback
management can involve closing certain parks or terminating certain recreation programs. Some
cutback management tactics may require a higher initial investment for the sake offuture return
rather than for current service delivery. However, tactics that appear beneficial in the short term
(such as deferred maintenance) are actually extremely wasteful in the long term. Specific cutback
management tactics that may be appropriate for Pontiac include the following:
1.

Institute a review of parks and recreation se\rvices by preparing a comprehensive
schedule of services by output, cost, and usage. All programs and activities should be
reviewed on a periodic basis to eliminate those no longer used or needed. Such a review
could be conveniently put on a computer for purposes of updating. The city should
consider the possibility of staged reductions, such as limiting the hours that parks or
community centers are open, or by reducing the frequency of recreation activities.

2.

Identify alternative service levels and establish a system for setting priorities among
programs and facilities. The city should incorporate this information into its Urban Park
and Recreation Recovery Plan in place of the traditional and outdated criteria presently
used to measure park and recreation needs.

3.

Identify and involve affected parties in the cutback management process, such as
employees, unions, and park users. Measure the costs of services in terms that can be
understood by these parties (such as the cost of each recreation activity per user).

Page 6.2

•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
II
II
II
II

II

�Consider the effects of cuts on equity, to be certain that the burden of such cuts does not
fall disproportionately on those least able to pay for alternatives. Communicate these
considerations to the affected parties through the use of public hearings, public opinion
polls, newspapers, and other media.
4.

Examine current and projected changes in population, and subsequent changes in the
use of services that may indicate the need to terminate services or shift resources. This
tactic is especially important in Pontiac, where the population as a whole is growing
much older. Also, there are population movements within the city which suggest the
need to geographically shift resources. For example, field observation revealed that in
certain parts of the city, basketball courts are overutilized but tennis courts are seldom
in use, whereas in other parts of the city, the reverse is true. It appears that resources
could be more efficiently used by replacing tennis courts with basketball courts in those
neighborhoods where basketball is a popular sport. Similar benefits can be achieved by
shifting other facilities to the neighborhoods or community centers where they are most
used.

5.

Determine short- and long-term maintenance costs prior to developing new facilities or
instituting new services. Exercise restraint in accepting Federal or state funds that may
carry long-term costs. This tactic is also very important in Pontiac, because the city's
difficult fiscal status can be attributed largely to the complex task of maintaining older,
deteriorating facilities. New facilities will only compound the problem.

6.

Sell surplus property and lease it back when needed or when the city's fiscal status
improves.

7.

Determine if any recreation or park services are available from other departments within
Pontiac government, from the Pontiac Community School District or other units of
government or from the private sector at a lower cost. In times of fiscal restraint,
cooperation between departments is of utmost importance. Administrators from the
Departments of Community and Human Services, Public Works and Service, and Police,
as well as other concerned departments and the mayor's office, should meet on a monthly
or bi-monthly basis to determine if the responsibility for certain programs or problems
should be shared, or if programs should be shifted to other departments for the purpose
oflong-term efficiency.

8.

Analyze the workload in all departments by time of day and day of week and evaluate
the use of part-time staffing in recreational, grounds, and maintenance programs. Parttime staff make up nearly half the seasonal work force in some communities. Pontiac
makes good use of part-time seasonal staff. At the time this plan was prepared, the city
was employing 13 part-timers out of 29 parks and grounds seasonal employees and 12
part-timers out of 14 golf course seasonal employees.

9.

Review insurance coverage and patterns of claims to determine if coverage can be cut
back to a more appropriate level in line with sources ofliability. The extra cost of
including volunteers under the city's insurance package should be weighed against the
expected benefits to be derived from a full-scale volunteer program.

10.

Incorporate performance measures and employee incentives that encourage and reward
efficiency. Since Pontiac is compelled to exercise fiscal conservation, nonfinancial
motivators such as employer and public recognition must be enhanced. Increases in
benefits and salaries should be tied to productivity increases that can be realistically
measured. Such incentives are not readily apparent in Pontiac; without them, the level
of services and productivity is likely to decline.

Page6.3

�Improve park security by providing the Community and Human Services Department with
its own security budget with which to buy security services from "the Pontiac Police
Department. As of preparation of this plan, the CommWlity and Human Services Department had
to request police protection for the parks. It was often dissatisfied with the amount of time officers
devoted to patrolling parks. The CommW1ity and Human Services Department believes that this
problem will be reduced if its budget is increased to allow it to contract directly with the Police
Department for specific security patrols at specific times. It is expected that the CommWlity and
Human Services Department will be best nble to determine the most important times for providing
police patrols in each of the city's parks . The Police Department will retain responsibility for
responding to specific criminal activities in parks at all times.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Communities provide park facilities in accordance with the electorate's desires and ability
to pay, not according to national or regional "standards." Wealthy commW1ities can be
responsive to the expressed and anticipated desires of recreation facility users. Less wealthy
communities must carefully prioritize commW1ity recreation expenditures. Notwithstanding these
obvious limitations, it is common for commWlities to consider national or other "norms" to evaluate
the adequacy of their parks. The Pontiac 2000 Plan included standards based on recommendations
of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, the National Parks and Recreation Association,
and the Urban Land Institute. The Pontiac 2000 Plan noted that ''These standards are not intended
as absolute requirements, but as general guidelines when considering future park development."
They suggest a minimum standard of approximately 10 acres per 1,000 people in urban areas. The
City of Pontiac met this standard in 1980 and in 1990.

The size of Pontiac existing park facilities compare favorably with other communities of
similar population. A 1984 study by Gerald Luedtke and Associates foWld that several Michigan
communities with populations in the 70,000 to 80,000 range had park systems no more extensive
than Pontiac's. Per capita income of the other cities is, on average, higher than Pontiac's.

Page 6.4

•
•
•
•
•
•

�,

Table 6-1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MINIMUM RECREATION SITES STANDARDS _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Size Standards
per 300 Families
or 1,000 Persons

Minimum
Facility Size

Service Area

1/4 acre

1/4 acre

1/8 mile

Neighborhood Playground

1.5 acres

4 acres

1/2 mile

Neighborhood Park

2.0 acres

6 acres

1/4-3/4 mile

Community Park and
Playfield

2.5 acres

20 acres

1-1 1/2 miles

City-Wide Park

4.0 acres

50 acres

3.0 miles

Facility
Tot-Lot

Source:

Pontiac 2000 Plan based on standards published by the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources, the National Park and Recreation Association and the Urban Land Institute.

Table 6-2
PARK SYSTEM COMPARISONS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

City

Permanent
Park Maintenance
1980
Employees
Population Acreage

CityWide

Number of Parks
NeighTot
Com•
munity borhood Lots

Pontiac

76,715

590

16

2

9

12

12

Saginaw

77,508

541

38

4

8

19a

4

Kalamazoo

79,722

550

17

2

0

10

9

Royal Oak

70,893

480

20

NA

NA

NA

NA

St. Clair Shores

76,210

235b

23

23

0

a)
b)
c)
d)
e)

sc

sd

Includes 10 school/park combinations.
Approximate city-owned acreage only.
Includes marina and fishing pier.
Includes 6 school sites not maintained by city.
Includes 19 school sites not maintained by city.

Source: Telephone survey conducted in April, 1984 by Gerald Luedtke and Associates,
Incorporated.

Page 6.5

�Table 6-3
PARK AND COMMUNITY CENTER USAGE
Percent Who
Use Facility

Park

Community Center

Percent Who
Use Facility

Beaudette
Murphy
Galloway Lake
Hawthorne

12.9
8.4
1.9
19.8

Holland
Hayes J ones
Howard Dell
David Ewalt

8.4
4.2
11.0
8.7

J aycee
Aaron Perry
Oakland
Crystal Lake
Other 52.5
None

11.0
6.5
3. 5
2.7

Robert Bowens (Senior)
Lakeside
None

11.4
0.7
75.3

Source:

3. 6

Preliminary results from the 1984 Parks , Recreation, and Transportation Survey,
conducted by Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated. The survey question reads as
follows : ''Which Pontiac parks (community centers) do you or your family use or visit most
often?"

Pontiac residents have reported a reluctance to use parks due to fear for personal security;
observations by the Community and Human Services Department confirm low park
usership in some parks. In 1984, Gerald Luedtke and Associates did a telephone opinion survey of
Pontiac residents. The survey found that:
Many Pontiac residents no longer use the city's park facilities because they have a negative
image of the parks. These citizens feel that the parks are unsafe, or unattractive, or
uninteresting. There has been a definite decrease in park usage by family groups for picnics,
family reunions, church social gatherings, etc. To some degree, this poor image is true.
Many of the parks do have obsolete equipment, vandalized facilities , substance abuse, theft,
and other forms of crime.
This negative image was believed to far exceed any real tife problems which actually existed in the
parks . However, more recent field surveys conducted by the Pontiac Community and Human
Services Department indicate that some parks receive very little patronage. Usage is low in both
well-maintained and less well-maintained parks.

According to the Pontiac Community and Human Services Department, low park usage is
sometimes due to lack of facilities and programs. For example, Beaudette Park is a very
attractive facility. However, the Community and Human Services Department believes that a lack
of picnic tables and grills has resulted in lower usage than would otherwise be expected. Some parks
do not have satisfactory restroom facilities; a complaint that is often heard by the Community and
Human Services Department.

Page 6.6

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

•
•
•
•

�The Community and Human Services Department believes that good recreation programs
are one of the best ways to encourage park usage and heep crime_ out of par/ls. Past
experience at Murphy Park is a case in point. Attempts to close that Park to keep drug and
prostitution traffic out have not always been successful since it is possible to go around the barriers
at entrances. However, the Community and Human Services Department's sledding and toboggan
program brought in 600 to 700 people per weekend. That kind of legitimate traffic kept illegitimate
traffic out.

In the more distant past, Pontiac has allowed itself to be over encumbered with recreation
facilities which are costly to maintain. The Ewalt, Holland and Dell recreation centers are the
most recent indoor facilities. They more than doubled the number of indoor facilities which
previously existed, i.e. the Bowens and Hayes-Jones facilities. The five indoor facilities now in the
city's inventory put a very difficult strain on the city's recreation facility maintenance and
operational budget.
In the more recent past, Pontiac has concentrated on providing quality, maintenance free
equipment rather than on acquisition or expansion of parks and recreation centers. The
Grounds Division's new equipment acquisition policy has placed strong emphasis on putting vandalproof equipment in locations that are easy to patrol. Although this policy has been in effect for
nearly a decade, the Grounds Division recommends that future budgets continue to provide for
additional vandal proof equipment to replace obsolete equipment and to provide intensive
recreational opportunities in appropriate locations.
Money for new recreation facilities is available to Pontiac through Michigan's recreation
bonding program; this money must be carefully spent. The Michigan Quality of Life Recreation
Bond Program provides $70,000,000 state-wide over a period of years. During the past two years,
Pontiac became eligible to receive $155,000, contingent upon providing the required but as yet
Wlavailable match. Over the life of the program, the city is eligible to receive a total of $750,000.
The total matching must amount to one dollar of local money for each three dollars of state money
received. A one-to-one match may be required if the city elects to use Community Development
Block Grant money for matching. The $155,000 which the city became eligible to receive during the
past two years could provide needed restroom facilities at Jaycee Park, Aaron Perry Park and
Beaudette Park.

Page 6.7

�•
Table 6-4
EXISTING PONTIAC PARKS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

Residential Planning Area 1
1.

2.
3.
4.

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

Provided by Pontiac Planning Division
Pontiac Central High School
Washington Junior High School
Crofoot Elementary School
Beaudette Park
Crystal Lake Park
Basley and Brush Park
Municipal Golf Course
Whittier Elementary and Je!Terson Junior High School

Residential Planning Area 2

10.
11.
12.
13.

Wisner Stadium and Elementary School (confirm)
Walt Whitman Elementary and Lincoln Junior High School
Aaron Perry Park
McCarmll Elementary School
14 . Oakland Park
15. Mark Twain Elementary School
16. Provided by Pontiac Planning Division

Residential Planning Area 3

17.
18.
19.
20 .
21.
22.
23.

Human Resource Center/ Oriole Field
Longfellow Elementary School
Eastern Junior High School
Provided by Pontiac Planning Division
Robert Frost Elementary School
South Kiwanis Park
Murphy Park

Residential Planning Area 4

24.
25 .
26.
27.
28.

Henry Owen Elementary School
Louisa May Alcott Elementary School
Provided by Pontiac Planning Division
NorthKiwanisPark
Terry Lake

\
Residential Planning Area 5

29.
30.
31.
32.

Pontiac Northern H. S. / Madison J . H . S. / Northeast Oakland Vocational Center
LeBaron Elementary School
Emerson Elementary School
Provided by Pontiac Planning Division

Residential Planning Area 6

33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.

Hawthorne Park/ Nathanie / Hawthorne Elementary School
Weaver Elementary School
John F. Kennedy High School
Jaycee Park/ Malkin Elementary School
Galloway Park
Florence and Mary Herrington Elementary School

Page 6.8

Ill

Ill
Ill

•Ill
-

�Figure 6.1
EXISTING PONTIAC PARKS
-~

-

-

-

oil iiiii1i1 . . ..I

--a ..

liol

~

0'~- - 0
U

iii -

&gt;;tt ..,_. - -

,_
fd .... ,-.. . . -

-- •

- - - - - 1i11i 11111 . . . . .

:;I

ff

' .

,.
·; t

J

I

:l

00[]

Residential Planning Area Designation

[0101

Designates Existing Park (see Table 6.4)
i

"

.J

~

ll

0F'-! ___~0
Page6.9

�•
•
•
•II

Figure 6.2
DESIRABLE PARKS and PARK IMPROVEMENTS for PONTIAC

E)

.J

E)

0

0

J

0

1111

1 MILE

Ill

'!--

~
~

Residential Planning Area Designation
Existing Park
New Park (see Table 6.5)
~
~ Modification to Existing Park (see Table 6.5)

Page 6.10

II
II
II
II
II
II
II

&gt;
~

J

3

"'... - . z
..,

._
~

.l

•
•
•
1111

�Table 6-5
_ _ _ _ _ DESIRABLE PARKS and PARK IMPROVEMENTS for PONTIAC _ _ _ __
This table and Figure 6.1 present a desirable array ofparks for the City ofPontiac. The array i1Lcludes existing parks and new parl,s.
This table calls for reductions in the size of Hawthorne Park and Murphy Parh in order to ,u:commodate plarming objectives which
are not directly related to park and recreation needs. In total. the collection of parks shown on this table urul on Figure 6.1 is not
completely affordable at this time 1ior for the foreseeable future. The total collection is included as backRrourul information for
reference purposes only. It does not constitute a recommended parh system which must be tal,en as a whole in order to be desirable.
Residential Planning Areal
l.

Provide new neighborhood park; a site near Howland Avenue and Crestwood Street would be desirable.

2.

Provide new neighborhood tot lot; a location in the northern part of Franklin Street Neighborhood Housing Services
area would be desirable.

3.

Improve Hayes.Jones Community Center.

4.

Develop Seminole Hills Tot Lot.

5.

Retain and maintain existing parks.

Residential Planning Area 2
l.

Retain and maintain existing parks.

Residential Planning Area 3
l.

Reduce the size of Murphy Park to accommodate private residential development; improve remaining park area;
redevelop park so that grounds and facilities are more secw-e and visible from Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard.

2.

Retain and maintain other existing parks.

Residential Planning Area 4
l.

Redevelop Optimist Park (West Fairmount near Hollywood).

Residential Planning Area 5
l.

Retain and maintain existing parks.

Residential Planning Area 6
l.

Scale back Hawthorne Park to accommodate institutional development, if opportunity arises; retain and maintain
remaining land area; redevelop facilities for more intensive use; accommodate the Telegraph Road extension.

2.

Develop 50 acre Collier Road Park on the Collier Road land.fill site; consider facilities for sledding, tobogganing and
skiing to replace those at scaled back Murphy Park.

3.

Provide two new neighborhood parks in the northwest pa1t of Area 6 as residential development occurs; the parks
should be north of Walton Boulevard, with the first priority being the area between Telegraph Road and Baldwin
Avenue and the second priority being to the west; land acquisition could occw- concurrent with residential
development.

4.

Provide two new neighborhood parks in the northeast part of Area 6 as residential development occw-s; the parks
should be north of Walton Boulevard, one to the west of Galloway Creek near Joslyn and the other to the eru;t of the
Galloway Creek in the Giddings Road area; land acquisition could occur concurrent with residential development.

5.

Improve Galloway Community Park in accordance with ongoing improvement plan.

6.

Retain and maintain existing parks not otherwise mentioned.

Page6.ll

�Traditionally, park planners have found it desirable to maintair:z, a broad complement of
park facilities. Such a complement of facilities might be based on the.following strategies:
Provide a community park with a wide range of facilities and programs in each of the seven
Council districts.
Provide a neighborhood-oriented playground (School Board or city) to serve each of the
neighborhoods bounded by arterial streets. Supplement with passive parks where
appropriate.
In areas of higher density, provide convenient mini-parks when areas are not serviced by
other public or private neighborhood parks.
In all community parks and where appropriate in neighborhood parks, retain natural
areas for both environmental reasons and ease of maintenance.
Use resident surveys and park use observations to plan the details of park facilities and
programs; since some parks currently seem to receive little use, the reasons should be
determined.
Table 6-5 and Figure 6.2, both entitled "Desirable Parks and Park Improvements for Pontiac"
identify a broad complement of parks which illustrates one way to respond to the above strategies.

Traditionally, park planners have found it desirable to allocate park facilities and
resources in coordination with a city's overall development, redevelopment and
revitalization goals and policies and in accordance with special needs. These
considerations can be detailed as follows:
Recreation space and facilities should be coordinated with efforts to revitalize areas of the
city.
Neighborhoods which contain economically and socially disadvantaged citizens should
receive some priority in developing recreation areas and programs.
The needs of elderly citizens should also receive some priority in program and facility
development.
Recreation areas should be consistent with objectives to preserve the natural environment
and protect sensitive environmental resources from development.

Page 6.12

II

11
~

II

II
II
II

II

�Chapter 7
PONTIAC CIVIC CENTER ANALYSIS and
PRELIMINARY OPTIONS and CONCLUSIONS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

CITY HALL ANALYSIS and C O N C L U S I O N S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.

OBJECTIVE
To assess the general employment trends and space utilization needs of City Hall to determine
if any other departments can be located there or conversely, is there a space shortage.

2.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Table 7-1 summarizes the location of the offices in City Hall while Table 7-2 summarizes the
departmental employment levels and projections. The latter is based upon interviews with
department heads. On balance, there will be a projected staff reduction of about five percent or
six people. Given the extent to which employees are now working in converted halls and
storage rooms, this will not free up significant space. However, both the Law and Finance
Departments indicated that their work flow would benefit from some space rearrangement.
The Personnel Department lacks an on-site training or conference room. Such rearrangement
should follow an architectural or detailed space needs study of those departments.

3.

SERVICE TO PUBLIC
The functional allocation by floor and thus accessibility to the public appears to be logical. It
follows the pattern typical of most city halls, i.e. City Clerk, citizen-oriented finance divisions
and public information on the floor where people enter.

4.

CONCLUSIONS
City Hall should continue to accommodate essentially the same municipal functions that are
located there now. This assumes that option A (page 7.5) is not implemented, i.e. adding a
third floor to City Hall. A detailed space rearrangement study should be made of the Finance
and Law Departments plus a training room for Personnel. Otherwise, as the minor staff
reductions occur, the opportunity should be used to make the interior more "user friendly" by
interior design modifications that preserve the architectural integrity. Such improvements
might include brighter ceilings and more consistent sign graphics to eliminate the existing wall
"clutter."

Page 7.1

�Table 7-1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OFFICE LOCATIONS WITHIN CITY HALL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Ground Floor:
•
•

Personnel
Finance (administration, internal audit, purchasing, data processing, etc.)

First Floor:
•
•
•
•

Finance (income tax and treasurer)
Management Affairs (Mayor's office)
City Clerk
Communications (City Council)

Second Floor:

•
•

•
•
•

Law
Finance (assessor)
Council Chamber
Mayor
City Council office

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

II
II

•
Page 7.2

�Table 7-2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CITY HALL EMPLOYMENT STATUS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Department

Current Full
Time Staff

Finance

73

• Space adequate although
rearrangement desirable
• Projected staff reduction 1990-1995

Law

11

• Space adequate although some
rearrangement desirable
• No staff change

Mayor

11

•
•

Modest staff increase
Space adequate

Personnel

10

•

No change

City Clerk

5

•

Space adequate/no change

City Council

6

•

Space adequate/no change

Other Locations:
Community Development
Growth Group
P.W. Engineering

37
11

Status or Projections

12

Page7.3

�ONE-STOP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ANALYSIS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
1.

OBJECTIVE
To assess the feasibility of placing those agencies responsible for issuing development permits
in the same location as a "one-stop" development service office. Agencies responsible for
issuing permits include Engineering, Water and Sewer, Inspection Services and Planning.
Anyone seeking any kind of development permit could come to this one office which would have
technical personnel from several departments at that location. From a locational standpoint,
proximity to both City Hall and the Growth Group (economic development agencies) is
desirable, particularly the latter.

2.

EXISTING BUILDINGS
As a result of interviews and site visits, the following has been determined:

City Hall: Although some minor space rearrangement is possible to both improve
existing offices and free up space, this would not provide enough space for the
development services cluster.
Transportation Center: Although adequate for Community Development's space needs,
there is little excess space and the location is remote from City Hall. Some thought is
being given to using this as a conference center. About 8,600 square feet is used by the
department.

Public Works: This location is even more remote from City Hall and not convenient for
visitors. The space is adequate in quantity but not in quality for offices oriented to the
public, particularly prospective developers. Some 3,900 square feet is used by
Engineering although not all of this is needed for the current staff.
3.

THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Conceptually there are four components to city government. These components are:

Development: The agencies responsible for issuing permits, including Engineering,
Water and Sewer, Inspection Services and Planning. These all deal extensively with that
portion of the private sector engaged in dev~opment. The Growth Group also deals
extensively with the private development community and therefore might be included in
this overall cluster.
Public Safety: Primarily fire and police.
Municipal Services: These are the other line or service agencies such as public
utilities, public works, highways, recreation, human services, library and similar line or
service agencies.
Administration: These are the "staff' offices that serve the above three, e.g. law,
finance, personnel, the Mayor's staff, etc.
Ideally, each of these components should be physically located in close proximity to one
another. However, this is not practical due to the extensive shop and storage facilities of such
line agencies as Public Works and Utilities.

Page 7.4

II

II
II
II
II

•

�4.

THE OPTIONS
As shown in Figure 7.1, the civic center campus includes three city buildings (Fire, Police and
City Hall), two School Board buildings and the credit union. City Hall itself has a classical
symmetry which means any addition would be architecturally problematic. This leaves four
basic options if the one-stop development office is to be located near City Hall:
A.

Add Third Floor to City Hall:
There is the potential to add a third floor of some 10,000 square feet.

B.

Advantages:

•
•

Maximum proximity to Mayor and other City Hall offices.
Shares parking space with existing facilities; some additional
parking will be needed.

Disadvantages:

•
•

Costly in spite of ability to use existing building infrastructure.
Space would still be tight with no room for expansion.

New Building on the Civic Center Campus:
A new building could be constructed between City Hall and the School Board.
Advantages:

•
•
•

Disadvantages:

C.

•
•

Cost of new building.
Possible cost of structured parking.

School Board Administration Building (should it become available):
Advantages:

•
•
•

Disadvantages:

D.

Adequate office space can be provided.
Convenient to City Hall and relatively convenient to Growth
Group.
Shares parking space with existing facilities; some additional
parking will be needed.

•

No construction costs yet a fairly new building.
Convenient to City Hall and relatively convenient to Growth
Group.
Shares parking space with existing facilities.
Not available in short run unless School District makes
unanticipated changes.

Old Pontiac Central School Building (should it become available):
Advantages:

•

Preserves an important historic building and landmark.

Disadvantages:

•

Substantial construction costs for retrofitting.
Parking may be inadequate unless additional site area acquired .
Only relatively convenient to City Hall and relatively convenient
to Growth Group.
Not available in short run unless School District makes
unanticipated changes.

•
•

•

Page 7.5

�E.

Water Street Area of Downtown:
The Growth Group is now located at Water Street and Saginaw. This option would locate
the development service office along Water Street between Saginaw and City Hall in
either a recycled or new building.
Advantages:

•
•

•

Disadvantages:

•

Optimum proximity to both City Hall and Growth Group.
If recycled existing building can be used, less costly than new
construction.
Most directly assists downtown revitalization in general and
bridging "the gap" between the Phoenix Center and the CBD
core in particular.
Not adjacent to City Hall.

This analysis assumes the Growth Group will remain in downtown at their present
location. Another option would be for them to join the "development center" at one of
the Civic Center sites.

Note:

THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS ANALYSIS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
1.

OBJECTIVE
To assess the urban design implications of the "City Hall Analysis and Conclusions" section
and the "One-Stop Development Services Analysis" section for the campus area.

2.

ANALYSIS
As indicated in the "One-Stop Development Services Analysis," if any expansion of the City

Hall building occurs, it could best be achieved by adding a third floor rather than by ground
floor additions. However, the analysis suggests that if the "one-stop" development complex is
to be located in the Civic Center, a new building just south of City Hall may be more cost
effective. The parking analysis below is particularly relevant.
The Police Department building recently went through extensive interior renovation and
therefore is generally adequate to serve the foreseeable needs of the department.
\

The other components of the Civic Center are as follows:
a.

School District Administration Office: No physical change anticipated.

b.

Credit Union: No physical change anticipated.

c.

School District Human Resources Center: Currently all space is utilized.

The Fire Department and continuing education building are across Pike Street; so too is the
Old Pontiac Central School Building which now serves as a placement center for the Pontiac
School District.

Page 7.6

II
II
II

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

II
II

•

�3.

PARKING
The three buildings listed above each have there own parking lots. The large lot behind City
Hall has 278 spaces and also serves the Police Department building. Obviously, in Wlique
situations all four lots (626 spaces) function as one to provide overflow parking. However, the
existing lot meets the normal daily needs of the two buildings. Only if a City Hall "annex" is
constructed to the south (where a 22-space lot is now located) would additional City Hall
parking have to be obtained either by a shared arrangement with the Human Resources
Center or construction of a parking deck. The Police Department parking lot on the west side
of the Police Department building is often filled with Wlsightly busses.

4.

URBAN DESIGN CONCLUSIONS
Downtown Linkage: A strong streetscape corridor should be designed and developed along
Pike Street to better link City Hall and the rest of the Civic Center complex with downtown
and thereby encourage pedestrian traffic. The corridor should have special sidewalk materials,
quality street lights, trees and other amenities. A pedestrian linkage at Water Street could be
considered. Such a linkage would be more convenient to the core of the Civic Center, but it
would probably not be much used Wlless served by a traffic light. A pedestrian bridge could be
considered at Water, but this would block the view of the Pontiac Central School Building,
which is too important and beautiful a landmark to be effaced by a structure of such
questionable necessity. A raised pedestrian pathway should be developed parallel to the east
side of Wide Track. Such a pathway would provide a promenade with an elevated view of
downtown. It would offer a pleasant opportunity for pedestrians to get from buildings in the
Civic Center complex to the proposed Pike Street pedestrian pathway.
New Architecture South of City Hall: If a new building is built south of City Hall, it should be
designed by a very talented architect who is able and willing to relate it artistically to the
existing City Hall building and the existing School Administration building. An architect
willing to submerge his design ego as Antonio da Sangallo the Elder did at the Piazza della
Santissima Annunciata is needed (see Figure 3.12, Chapter 3 of this plan).
Parking: The existing main parking lot would benefit from more trees and landscaping. There
should also be better directional graphics. The Police Department parking lot on the west side
of the Police Department building should be relocated for aesthetic reasons. Until it is
relocated, it should be screened by a low masonry wall or evergreens and it should be used to
park no W1sightly or large vehicles.

Page7.7

�II
II

Ill
Ill
Ill
1111
1111

...
.
-~. .,
1'!.
.....'"-;\ •·•·
.·:. ...•·...

II
II
II
II
II

-~ \

II

, ',

~~
~

'

'

.\ . r··
';

I\

\

Page 7.8

·••I'

\

�Figure 7.1
CIVIC CENTER AREA USES and
PROPOSALS
Opposite Page

Notes for Figure 7.1
1.
City Hall: City Hall can be expanded to
provide for a "one stop" grouping of municipal development
services including Engineering, Water and Sewer.
Inspection Services and Planning. The Growth Group could
also be included in this array. The original plans for City
Hall made provision of a third floor.

2.
Open site south of City Hall: This site
could accommodate a "one stop" grouping of municipal
development services. Construction of a new building at
this location would probably be cheaper and less disruptive
than would be construction of a third floor on City Hall.
The new building would be somewhat less conveniently
located to parking. If a new building is built at this site, it
should be designed by a very talented architect who is able
and willing to relate it artistically to the existing City Hall
building and the existing School Administration building.
An architect willing to submerge his design ego as Antonio
da Sangallo the Elder did at the Piazza della Santissima
Annunciata is needed (see Figure 3.12).
3.
School Administration Building: If the
Pontiac School Board were to relocate its administrative
functions elsewhere, the existing building could
accommodate a "one stop" municipal development services
facility. In either case, no major physical change is
anticipated for this building.
4.
Old Pontiac Central School Building: If
the Pontiac School Board were to relocate its placement
functions, this building could accommodate a "one stop"
municipal development services facility, but it is less
convenient than any of the possibilities mentioned above.
The area available for on-site parking is inadequate.
5.
Water Street Site Downtown: A site on or
near Water Street could accommodate a "one stop"
municipal development services facility. Depending on the
particular building that might be available, costs could be
relatively modest. Downtown revitalization would be
promoted. A Water Street location would be very
convenient to the Growth Group, less convenient to City
Hall.
6.

9.
Policy ffepartment Building: No major
physical change is anticipated for this building.
10.
Municipal Credit Union Building: No
major physical change is anticipated for this building.
11.
Fire Department Building: No major
physical change is anticipated for this building.

12.
Streetscape Corridor: A strong
streetscape corridor should be developed along Pike Street
to link the Civic Center with downtown. The corridor
should have special sidewalk materials, quality street
lighting, trees and other amenities.
13.
Raised Pedestrian Pathway: A raised
pedestrian pathway parallel to, but up the hill from Wide
Track Drive East could connect the Civic Center to Pike
Street. It would separate walkers from the unpleasantness
of Wide Track trallic and provide them with an elevated
view. The pedestrian way could be developed with a
retaining wall and landscaping to form a "base" for City
Hall and the other Civic Center buildings.
14.
Main Civic Center Parking Lot: This lot
has 278 spaces which serve City Hall and the Police
Department building. If a new building is constructed at
site 2 (see discussion above), some provision will be needed
for additional parking. A parking deck is one possibility.
Shared use of School Board parking is another. Additional
trees are needed whether or not a parking deck is
constructed.

15.

Pike Street.

16.

Wide Track Drive East.

17.

Wide Track Drive West.

18.
Department of Public Works Facility:
Relocation of this facility to either the water distribution
site on Opdyke Road or to the sewage treatment site on
Auburn Road is possible. If Public Works engineering
functions join pe1mit issuing divisions in a "one stop"
development services location, then the rational for
relocation is strengthened. The existing location is central,
but the facility is not modern.
19.

Wide Track Drive West.

20.

Wessen Street.

Growth Group Facility.

7.
Transportation Center: This is an
inconvenient location for the Pontiac Community
Development Department.
8.
Police Department Parking Lot: This lot
is often home to unsightly busses. It is too visually
prominent a location for such parking. A section of the
main Civic Center parking lot (site 14) should be cordoned
ofJfor such parking. The Police Department parking lot
should be ripped up or screened with a low masonry wall
and used for passenger vehicles only.

Page 7.9

�PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING ANALYSIS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
1.

OBJECTIVE
To assess the future of the W essen Street facility.

2.

ANALYSIS
The 1980 Comprehensive Plan advanced the idea of moving the Public Works Department to a
new building either at the Public Utilities/water distribution plant site on Opdyke Road near
South Boulevard or the Auburn Road sewage treatment plant site.
The existing location may be central to the balance of the city but otherwise hardly provides a
modem building in pleasant setting. If the engineering division is moved to a new
"development services office," this increases the argument for relocating the "line" functions.
The case would be further enhanced if the property could be marketed for redevelopment.
The related difficult question is where the Director of Public Works should be located. Some
cities have opted for having the director with engineering at the office close to or in the
downtown City Hall. Others have opted to keep the director with the line divisions at a
location that has to be relatively remote from City Hall in larger cities. There seems to be no
ideal solution.

3.

CONCLUSION
Although not a priority issue, assuming Public Works Engineering is moved to the
development services center and there is a reasonable prospect for private redevelopment of
the Wessen Street tract, then consideration should be given to moving the line functions to the
Opdyke Road location although it is recognized that there is a limited amount of vacant land
on the tract. Inevitably there are cost savings by having the Public Works and Public Utilities
operations and maintenance facilities adjacent to one another.

•
•
•
•II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

II
II

Page 7.10

•
•
•II

�Chapters
GROWTH ENHANCEMENT POLICIES
and DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL REPORT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
A Summary of Findings with Pertinent Policies

INTRODUCTION---------------------------

The PHH Fantus Company, the nation's oldest and largest economic development consulting firm,
prepared development potential and growth enhancement reports for the comprehensive planning
program. Fantus' charge was two-fold: 1) to assess Pontiac's development potential for various
types of economic activity, and 2) to make recommendations to guide the city in attracting new
economic activity. Fantus' analysis and recommendations encompassed the whole city but focused
on five designated study areas. Fantus' analysis and recommendations are summarized in this
chapter of the plan.
Following this Introduction, the chapter is divided into two sections. The first section, entitled
"Growth Enhancement Policies," provides recommendations for addressing the city's larger
development issues and for developing each of the study areas. The second section, entitled
"Development Potential Report," discusses the economic trends affecting Pontiac, examines each of
the five study areas, and analyzes how Pontiac's strengths and weaknesses relate to the most
important requirements of major economic sectors.

GROWTH ENHANCEMENT POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

a Summary of PHH Fantus Recommendations
The city should contribute to, encourage and prod efforts by the school board and other
relevant parties to improve the local public education system. School deficiencies are the most
serious problem the city faces. The city's schools are producing a labor force unequipped to compete
in today's market place. Poor schools keep out of Pontiac the middle class population it would like to
attract. The city should foster a four part alliance to coordinate public school improvement efforts .
The alliance should include the School District, the city, the private sector business community and
the United Auto Workers. This alliance should develop a cooperative program for school district
improvement. The resources of retired executives and UAW workers should be employed on a
volunteer basis. Oakland Community College, Oakland University and Wayne State University
should be invited to contribute technical assistance. Financial problems will increase if General
Motors wins its tax abatement suit. The year 2001 will bring the end of the tax abatement for
Oakland Technology Center. This will double the school district's tax base.
The city should contribute to, encourage and prod efforts to improve labor availability and
quality. Labor availability and quality are the most important issues in business location decision.
Pontiac's resident work force lacks the skills to be competitive. Basic reading and computational
skills must be enhanced. A strong vo-tech curricula in the public schools is critical to preparing
students for a vo-tech training at Oakland Community College.

The city should take meaningful steps to reduce crime. Crime and the perception of crime
chases away desirable residents, customers and workers, particularly female workers. A highly
visible effort to reduce crime should be concentrated in the downtown. Foot patrol and/or mounted
police should be part of the effort, particularly downtown.

Page 8.1

�The city as a whole should continue to talze specific and positive steps to improve
community cooperation; and so too should each individual elected official and
administrator. Progress to this end had been made in the months prior to completion of this plan .
However, long standing practices and perceptions are difficult to reverse and are a negative for the
city's economic development efforts. The portion of the business community interviewed by the PHH
Fantus Company for this plan sees two very serious problems: 1) the lack of cooperation between the
Mayor and the City Council, and 2) the lack of appreciation of private sector needs. The following
remedial actions are recommended: 1) the Mayor and City Council should conduct a retreat to
establish an economic development consensus ; 2) the Growth Group or a third party should put on
training seminars to educate top city agency staff on the city services needs of the business
community; 3) top city staff and elected officials should attend management development seminars;
4) public-private coordinating council should be established to meet regularly on issues of local
concern; 5) the city should settle its problems with General Motors amicably, not in an adversarial
way, and it should work cooperatively with General Motors whenever possible in future endeavors;
6) the Mayor and top agency staff must work to establish better working relations with Oakland
County leadership and staff.
The city should take specific steps to correct real problems that give Pontiac a poor image;
public relations are not enough. For all the reasons discussed elsewhere, Pontiac has such a
negative image that it will not even be considered by many private sector economic development
decision makers. No amount of public relations will overcome the city's negative image. The City of
Pontiac must show that it recognizes the problems, is willing to make sacrifices and devote the
resources necessary to address them and can achieve results. Further, the city should reject such
negative facilities as the proposed county incinerator, correctional facility, and halfway house. These
and social service facilities such as missions exacerbate Pontiac's image as the center for Oakland
County's social ills. The city already has a disproportionate share of such facilities.

The city should lower property taxes. Except for the most capital intensive industries, property
taxes comprise less than 10 percent of the total geographically variable operating cost; usually they
amount to three to four percent. Relative to labor costs, investment costs and freight costs, property
taxes are not normally important. They become important when all other considerations are equal.
They are killers when they are a negative on top of many other competitive negatives. In Pontiac,
property and income taxes are business climate issues. The city must lower property taxes and, as
soon as possible, eliminate its income tax in order to be perceived as moving in the right direction.

The city should improve the efficiency of municipa{ service delivery. The following three
actions are recommended: 1) make productivity the basis for future wage bargaining with municipal
unions; 2) privatize municipal services to the extent possible; and 3) privatize Pontiac General
Hospital, the Silverdome, the golf course and the cemetery. The city may be able to leverage
additional resources from the state, if it can show that it is improving efficiency. However,
dependence on outside resources is not recommended.

The city should broaden and strengthen its local economic development effort. At the
moment, staff responsibilities for the Growth Group fall more in line with organizational affinities
than programmatic functions. Economic development is too competitive for this to continue. The
Growth Group staff should be organized along programmatic functional lines such as business and
industry retention, business and industry attraction (foreign and domestic), small business
development, and broader community development issues. Special programs can also be considered
as the basis for staff organization. The level of professionalism of the economic development staff

Page 8.2

•
•
•II

II

•II

II
II
II
II
II
II
II

•
•
•
•II

�must be constantly upgraded through training and seminars. The city's best economic development
potential is to attract small firms and start-ups. The following approacbes are suggested by PHH
Fantus: 1) continue to provide financing and property related incentives to reduce operating costs.
but do not impose "local hire" requirements and "minority hire" requirements; 2) become
knowledgeable about the plans for Oakland Technology Park in order to devise a plan to attract
related businesses; 3) use "targeting" to identify manufacturing and office businesses that most
benefit from the city's strengths and are least harmed by its weaknesses; 4) develop incubator space;
and 5) develop a technology transfer program that links new businesses with Oakland University
and other educational institutions. Finally, little effort should be invested in external marketing until
the basic community development issues discussed above and the remedial issues de •·cribed below are
addressed.

The Growth Group should market Pontiac's strengths. Relative to competitors in Oakland
County, Pontiac has strength in: 1) unskilled labor availability, 2) vocational-technical education, 3)
higher education. 4) corporate air service, 5) infrastructure, and 6) real estate costs. Relative to
communities in other parts of Michigan and in other states, Pontiac has strength in: 1) market
access, 2) highway access, 3) trucking service, and 4) commercial air service. Targeting efforts
should focus on these strengths.
The city should work to provide industrial sites and office and industrial buildings. Over
70 percent of Fantus' locational engagements begin with a building search. Modern industrial
space in the 40,000 to 50,000 square foot range and ''flexspace" in a smaller range are in great
demand. With little inventory of attractive buildings, Pontiac is at a disadvantage. The city should
inventory all vacant and underutilized sites and publish a directory indicating zoning, ownership,
access, attractiveness for development, assessed valuation, and potential environmental problems.
The city should work with General Motors to determine the feasibility of acquiring the South
Boulevard facility for reuse and/or redevelopment. The city should also work with the U.S. Army
and the state's congressional delegation to determine the feasibility of acquiring the South Boulevard
Storage Facility for redevelopment or reuse. The South Boulevard - Opdyke Road area offers the
very best potential for developing industrial-type facilities in Pontiac. Pontiac has office sites
downtown and at Clinton Valley, but limited building offerings.

The City should modify its incentive policies and improve the application of incentives. In
order to attract new businesses, Pontiac has offered land cost write downs, financing at below
market interest rates, tax incentives and training assistance. These incentives do not normally drive
location search or expansion decisions. Much more important are labor costs and transportation
costs. Also more important are access to markets, labor availability and quality of life. Incentives
serve as a tie-breaker when these other considerations are equal. It is recommended that incentives
be used more sparingly and only to secure firms with a high probability for survival after the
incentives are withdrawn. It is also recommended that "local hire" requirements be dropped. Labor
quality and availability are too important to be constrained.

Page8.3

�DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL REPORT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

a Summary of PHH Fantus Findings
Oakland County has experienced tremendous growth since the mid-1980's, but Pontiac has
not participated fully in the county's growth. Examples of the growth differential are:
•

Oakland County experienced a net population increase of 10 percent between 1980 and
1989. Pontiac's population decreased by 3.1 percent over the same period.

•

Pontiac's unemployment rate-still in double digits-has remained twice as high as the
county's unemployment rate.

•

The household income levels of Pontiac residents have averaged nearly 35 percent less
than in the county.

While Oakland County has experienced its greatest growth between 1984 and 1989 in the contract
construction; finance , insurance, and real estate; services; and retail sectors; Pontiac's economy has
remained stagnant. Excluding General Motor's employment, Pontiac's manufacturing sector is
extremely small. There are few manufacturers employing over 50 employees.

Despite its level of employment in Pontiac, General Motor's employment and sales effects on
the city have declined. The decline has been experienced in the following specific ways:
•

A growing percentage of General Motor's jobs in Pontiac have been held by non-Pontiac
residents.

•

There are virtually no General Motor's suppliers located in Pontiac.

•

Pontiac employees not living in the city do not frequent Pontiac retail establishments.

Pontiac's economic strengths and weaknesses were analyzed as they relate to the most
critical needs of six different economic development sectors. The six sectors are:

•
•

•
•
•
•

Headquarters Office Facilities
Back-Office Facilities
High-Tech Manufacturing
Traditional Manufacturing
Distribution Facilities
Retail

\

Of the six sectors, distribution presently offers the best fit for Pontiac; headquarters office
facilities are unlikely to be attracted to Pontiac. While Pontiac offers a number of advantages
for each sector, the city also exhibits a number of basic and critical disadvantages for developing
each sector. These disadvantages relate largely to:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Page 8.4

the quality of Pontiac's resident labor force;
the limited willingness of nearby labor force to work in Pontiac;
poor labor-management relations;
the perceived low quality oflife in Pontiac;
the perceived negative image of Pontiac; and
limited real estate availability.

•
•
•
•
•II

II
II

�HIGHWOOD Industrial Park is the city's only significant industrial land offering, but it is
questionable whether its advantages overcome its negatives, especially relative to the
attractiveness of competing sites within the county. Highwood is rated positively on available
acreage, land costs, and improvements. It is rated negatively for access, attractiveness, and
compatibility with surronnding uses.
SILVERDOME Industrial Park lacks acreage; this renders the park not viable as a site for
significant development. Silverdome is rated positively on land costs, access, improvements,
compatibility of use, and for having attractive buildings for lease. It is rated negatively only for lack
of available land.
SILVERDOME air rites present an unusual development challenge; this combined with a
growing oversupply of office space and hotels in the 1-75 corridor, render the desirability of
further developing the site questionable at this time. The Silverdome site is rated positively on
available acreage, land costs, access, and improvements. The site's attractiveness and adjacent uses
were rated as negatives.
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT obstacles to development are substantial. The CBD is
rated positively on available acreage, land costs, and historic character of existing buildings. It is
rated negatively on access and circulation, attractiveness and image, present mix of uses and
relationship to the rest of the city.
CLINTON VALLEY is rated the most fl,exible site the city has for development and as
offering the greatest development potential. The site is rated positively on available acreage,
land costs, improvements, access for some uses, and physical characteristics, and compatibility with
adjacent uses. It is rated negatively for its past use, the uncertainty surronnding the future of the
core portion of the site, and access for some uses.
In the past, Pontiac's weaknesses have far outweighed its strengths for private sector
development. This is evident from an examination of the development that has taken place just
outside of the city's borders.
The city may be at a strategic crossroad since it faces opportunities that may not come
again for many years into the future. Ifit does not take significant actions to address its
economic weaknesses, the never-again opportunity that the Oakland Technology Park presents,
along with the northward growth of Oakland Connty, will bypass the city.
In order to succeed in the competitive economic development environment that Pontiac
faces, Fantus believes that the city must FIRST address five basic economic development
issues: 1) the low state of the local public education; 2) the high rate of crime; 3) the
historically low levels of community cooperation; 4) the city's very negative image; 5) the
city's very onerous tax rates; 6) the low efficiency ofpublic service delivery; and 7) the low
quality of local economic development efforts. These problems may sometimes be perceived by
the public to be greater than they actually are. However, Fantus believes that they are all very real
and very damaging to the city. They must be addressed in substance rather than as a public
relations effort.

Page8.5

�SECOND, in order to succeed, Fantus believes that Pontiac must_ also take the following
operational steps: 1) market Pontiac's strengths; 2) act to improve labor availability and
quality; 3) provide industrial sites and office and industrial buildings; 4) modify the city's
incentive policies and improve the application of incentives.
THIRD, in order to succeed, Fantus believes that Pontiac must take specific steps to
enhance the marketability of its industrial parks, the Clinton Valley site and the
downtown; these steps are set forth in sections of the plan specifically devoted to these
areas.

\

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
II
II
II

II

Page 8.6

�Chapter9
HIGHWOOD and SILVERDOME INDUSTRIAL PARKS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses
Highwood Industrial Park Policies
Targeted uses should include smaller assembly and light-manufacturing firms, not concerned with
image and not heavily utilizing truck transportation.
A three-part strategy should be used to attract distribution and General Motors suppliers to this
park:
1.

Intensively market the vacant Diolight plant.

2.

Improve park appearance (signage, entrance and grading).

3.

Widen Walton Boulevard and Collier Road. This is absolutely critical to attracting
distribution facilities.

Silverdome Industrial Park Policies
Targeted uses should include smaller manufacturing firms of all types and location of an incubator.
Signage and entryway improvements should be made.
Intensive marketing of any buildings that become vacant is the most significant opportunity.
Distribution and General Motors parts suppliers are logical reuses.

Page 9.1

�Chapter 10
SILVERDOME STADIUM SITE LAND USE and
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses
The long range potential for additional economic development of the Silverdome site
should be kept firmly in view and future planning decisions should be tailored to protect
and enhance this potential whenever possible. Almost since it was first developed, the
Silverdome site has been viewed as offering potential for additional development. Architectural
concepts showing offices, a hotel and a sports arena have been prepared over the years. These
concepts are predicated on building parking structures on the existing lots and raising office and
hotel towers above podium levels at the tops of the parking structures. During recent years, major
development projects completed or announced in Auburn Hills have positioned themselves to capture
much of the market which would be available to Silverdome site facilities. In addition, the need to
negotiate the allocation of property rights and responsibilities between developer and the City would
add an extra level of complexity to the development process. The market potential for the site in
1990 does not appear strong enough to overcome this extra difficulty. During the next decade, this
picture might change.

\

'

.--~. ::..

,,

.

;.''

- .
Figure 10.1

SILVERDOMEDEVELOPMENTCONCEPT
This concept shows an intensification of development at the Silverdome site through the addition of a
hotel, an arena and a parking structure. This particular mix of uses may not be feasible in the
future, but the basic idea of adding new facilities to the existing development is well worth pursuing.
Concept prepared by the Pontiac Community Development Division c. 1985.

Page 10.1

�Chapter 11

HISTORIC PONTIAC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
A Personal Architectural View by Edward D. Francis, F .A.I.A.
The architectural character of a city is principally defined by the buildings that make up its fabric,
and in a direct way reflect civic values, priorities, attitudes and aspirations. It is my view that the
City of Pontiac stands as a living museum that presents a rich mixture of architectural expressions.
It holds much that its people can take pride in. In particular, there are two concentrations of historic
structures that deserve notice and comment, the remaining portions of the original Central Business
District and the Clinton Valley Center complex located west of downtown.
The Central Business District is saturated with architectural jewels whose variety of styles visually
narrate the development of architectural thought and expression through the last 100 years. The
construction of refined historic revival designs and inventive creative expressions reflected the
merchant/builder's desire to provide a timeless and diversified setting for their merchandise. This
environment was expected to imbrue their products with additional value. While the majority of
buildings are clear examples of the commercial style popular in the first quarter century, the Riker
building and the Pythian building are amongst the city's best. There are numerous other styles that
shine as well. The Masonic Temple, for one, is firmly rooted in the Spanish/Moroccan tradition. The
Salvation Army building is representative of the late Gothic Revival style. The Community National
Bank and the Strand Theatre are strong expressions of the Neo-classical and English Renaissance
Styles, respectively. There are excellent examples of the Art Deco sty le of the pre- and postdepression eras such as the Pontiac State Bank building and the southwest corner building at 29 N.
Saginaw. In addition, there are numerous other styles of architecture that add color and texture to
the city's fabric. Second Empire, Romanesque, Italianate, Georgian, Victorian, Sullivanesque,
International and Modern are styles that I noted on a recent tour of the downtown area. Given this
rich and rare milleu of architecture it is unfortunate that the condition of many Central Business
District structures has declined since I last observed them in 1980. Pontiac has evolved like other
cities in this country. As the downtown has matured and the buildings have been adapted to new
uses, they have undergone major alterations that have had a overall negative affect on the quality of
the city. Original storefronts have been replaced with insensitive contemporary designs. Large
retail signs hide precious details. In the worst cases, entire historically significant buildings have
been covered with inappropriate contemporary skins. On the other hand the Pike Street Station and
Chimayo restaurants show how new uses can be sensitively integrated into an older building without
compromising its integrity. Sadly, these buildings are the exception to the rule, but they do
represent a model by which other developments should be measured against. Their owners are
sensitive to the appropriate use of color, texture, scale and proportion. It is often suggested that
extensive covered walkways be introduced in older downtown shopping areas. Unfortunately such
well intentioned action visually overpowers and destroys the special marketability of a historic
environment and, in addition, produces yet another public maintenance liability. The use of
historically appropriate awnings and overhangs, designed for each individual front, preserve the
traditional visual diversity of a downtown area and provide the required weather protection for
patrons. I believe that conscientious planning, critical review, standard guidelines, public awareness
programs and financial incentives will encourage preservation and authentic restoration. Perhaps
under the auspices of a Nationally Registered Historic District, the character of the Central Business
District could reclaim much of its historical character.
Some distance to the west of the Central Business District sits another historically significant
collection of buildings. The Clinton Valley Center stands as a marvelous example of 19th century
Victorian architecture. The towered central building was designed by the master architect, Elijah
Myers, whose accomplishments include five state capitol buildings including Michigan's 1879
masterpiece which is presently being restored. The complex is sited in the tradition of 19th century
farmhouses, atop high ground exerting its presence and commanding picturesque views over the

Page 11.1

�surronnding landscape. The original red brick structure is awash in delightful Victorian decoration.
The closer one studies the facades the more is discovered. Unfortnnate]y, however, much of this
splendor has been covered through subsequent renovations and additions. While most of the later
buildings are constructed with similar materials, their scale, proportion and more importantly their
siting detracts significantly from the original intent that Elijah Myers envisioned. Although many of
the outlying buildings sit in a state of disrepair or are vacant they appear to be well suited for new
adaptive uses, such as offices and housing. The barn structure could serve as public assembly space,
i.e., meeting room, exhibit, theatre or dining. In addition, the vast underdeveloped land that
surronnds Clinton Valley Center has many attributes desirable for new private development. The
pressures exerted by the growing demands of Oakland County make it apparent that a master plan
be commissioned for the site. It should focus on the economic implications of the preservation and
adaptive reuse of the existing historic facilities and set forth guidelines for new development that
will be sympathetic to the existing complex.
The general decline in the conditions of the buildings in the Central Business District and the
Clinton Valley Center are symptomatic oflarger issues that perhaps have not been clearly presented
to the community: Are these buildings worth saving and do they in fact have a value to the city? As
an architectural preservationist/historian, it is clear to me that they represent precious assets, fully
deserving civic attention and stewardship. My hope is that the people of Pontiac recognize this and
begin to initiate measures that focus on restoring these architectural treasures. Indecision and
delay will only serve to allow continued disintegration of these historic resources. Action on the
other hand can result in maintaining and enriching these two nnique attractive and viable
architectural places. The result will combine the past, present and future in a unique environment.
When that day comes Corning, New York and Baltimore, Maryland, cities respectful of their past,
will have nothing on the City of Pontiac.

\

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

Page 11.2

�- ;l

,,... ~

i ~.; ,

, '~- -/. l~ _.'. L_;_,

i

1·-,

l 7\

.

1
1•w

1
in!m....,
,
-1·
·
l
~11-~.
~I~~
·~ •·~ ''·"! ~ ! ~\

~~:Jmr
~I
,:·
mr·mi mr1 '.
:

:

.

~

I

Jm),- !.Utffll,

' .·. :.m11
t

:4

ff

11:,a'IIJlli/

,~
a~.r
'··:·: i.

..-. . ~- ·:-:.• :-. r·

-,-;··,-r: ,
: _;

r.

·n1·wr
Page 11.3

�I
I
I
I

Figure 11.2
MASONIC TEMPLE and PONTIAC STATE BANK BUILDING, DETAILS
"Architecturally integrated details both humanize and enrich the built environment" says Edward
Francis, pictured below with some of Pontiac's architectural visages.

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Page 11.4
- -

-

-

---

-

�Figure 11.3
THE NEWLY RESTORED EXTERIOR of the STRAND THEATER

Page 11.5

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

Figure 11.4 (above)
SELECTED DOWNTOWN HISTORIC BUILDINGS
Left: Seventy-seven North Saginaw Street. Right: The Furlong Building.
Figure 11.5 (opposite)
SELECTED DOWNTOWN HISTORIC BUILDINGS
Top Right: The Lawrence Street Gallery Building.
Top Left: The Waldron Building. Bottom: The W.C. Turk Building.

Page 11.6

Ill

�Page 11.7

�Figure 11.6
PONTIAC STATE HOSPITAL at CLINTON VALLEY

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

•
•
•

•

Page 11.8

�Chapter 12
CLINTON VALLEY SITE LAND USE and
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses
The city should pursue residential use for the Clinton Valley site. Two hundred acres of the
Clinton Valley site have been conveyed to the City of Pontiac by a special act of the state legislature.
A portion of this acreage has been sold for private development. The result has been the Summit
Place shopping center on Telegraph and an office project on Elizabeth Lake Road. The size and
location of the Clinton Valley site free it from the image negatives that burden much of the city; yet
its distance from the interstate highway system limits its potential. Additional portions of the site
which are likely to be unneeded by the state should be used for good quality residential development.
Good quality residential development will greatly enhance the overall residential viability of
Residential Planning Area 1 (See Chapter 1), which is a key area of the city. The same or even
greater beneficial effect can be achieved by mixing a substantial number of residential units with
non-residential uses. However, development which is exclusively or primarily non-residential should
be avoided. Low-cost industrial buildings with minimum site amenities are particularly to be
avoided. In the past, consideration has been given to such development, largely because there are so
few available industrial sites in the city. However, such industrial use would be the least desirable
use for the Clinton Valley site. The problem of Pontiac's limited industrial site supply should be
solved elsewhere in the City.
Development of the Clinton Valley site should proceed according to an overall development
plan, not on a piecemeal basis as has occurred in the past. Piecemeal development has
resulted in the development of Oakland Pointe, a substantial shopping center, and a small office
complex. These are desirable uses, but they have been developed in a way which fails to maximize
the full potential of the site. The shopping center extends so far north on Telegraph that it will be
difficult to coordinate a Telegraph entrance to the interior of the site with the service drive of the
Summit Place Shopping Center on the west side of Telegraph. The buildings of the Oakland Pointe
shopping center do not relate in materials or forms to the historic state hospital buildings; nor do the
newly constructed office buildings on Elizabeth Lake Road; nor do the newly Fairlawn School
facilities. The overall plan of development should contain a primary entrance on Telegraph north of
Oakland Pointe. Some of the Oakland County administrative complex may be needed of this
entrance. The overall plan could also contain a secondary entrance on Elizabeth Lake Road. An
illustrative development concept is shown in Figure 12.1. Other concepts are being developed by the
Oakland County Planning Department during the preparation of this plan. The city may elect to
make one or more of these concepts part of its official planning policy for the Clinton Valley site.
The historic buildings at the Pontiac State Hospital should be preserved to the maximum
extent possible. The historic buildings on the Clinton Valley site are a unique treasure that is well
worth preserving. However, finding a developer willing and able to rehabilitate and retrofit them for
a new use will take longer, perhaps much longer, than finding a developer willing to construct the
kind of back-office facilities now on Elizabeth Lake Road. If this very worthy goal is to be pursued, it
should be prepared to commission a detailed architectural feasibility and market absorption studies
and then wait for a developer who can do the job right.

Existing retail and office use of the southwest portion of the Clinton Valley site should
continue, but no new office or commercial development should occur on Elizabeth Lake
Road. The existing office and commercial uses are new and in demand. However, Elizabeth Lake

Page 12.1

�Road is not prime development frontage. It should not be used for retail and office uses which would
necessarily reduce residential development opportunities.
·

A new office structure could be developed on or near Telegraph Road north of the existing
commercial facilities. Real estate and economic development experts who examined the site for
this study concluded that office uses offer the best potential for nonresidential development. The
economic development experts found the site to have some retail potential in association with office
development. Back-office operations and service-oriented office users are the most promising
prospects, although the site would compete with the downtown for such uses.
A portion of the Pontiac State Hospital site can be reserved to accommodate the Fairlawn
School without fatally impairing the site's development potential. This school wishes to
remain at the site and it has recently expanded its facilities. All of the school's buildings are next to
the Summit Place Shopping Center. They can be screened from Clinton Valley historic structures
and from other parts of the site to the north and east of the historic structures. Access can be
directly from Elizabeth Lake Road.

The relocation of an M-59 bypass using a Montcalm extension should be abandoned as a
basis for planning development at the Pontiac State Hospital. Substantial private
development of the Clinton Valley site may have to await decisions concerning the Pontiac State
Hospital facilities and the future route of M-59. Development of the Clinton Valley site will be
limited unless a decision is made soon to relocate existing facilities. There is a danger that delaying
a decision will result in the piecemeal development of currently available acreage, thus foreclosing
the potential to implement a coordinated development plan. A decision to bring M-59 through or
adjacent to the Clinton Valley site could greatly enhance its potential, providing the full site is
available for development. So long as no decision is made, the best strategy for development can not
be known.

Page 12.2

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

111

�Figure 12.1
CLINTON VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT

Key: 1) Main entry with landscaping and architectural gate. 2) Development pod for new residential
structures to be designed with proportions and materials compatible with existing historic
architecture on the site. 3) Historic buildings restored predominantly for residential use, but also for
retail and office use; under-grade parking to the extent feasible. 4) Architecturally incompatible
structures removed for parking. 5) Security gate. 6) Access to Oakland Pointe. 7) Thick landscape
buffer. 8) New office development. 9) Fairlawn School retained with access via Elizabeth Lake
Road.

-·
v'

'/,

, L'

·,di

'"&gt;

/

(

'

&gt;

.,.:i

&gt;

.

'.

/

,

/

/"'

,

Page 12.3

�Chapter 13
DOWNTOWN LAND USE, URBAN DESIGN and
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
with Related Data and Analyses

INTRODUCTION---------------------------

Following this introduction, Chapter 13 is divided into six sections entitled:
Downtown Improvement Policies for Pontiac
Planning Principles for Downtown Pontiac
Architectural Principles for Downtown Pontiac
Downtown Physical Analysis: Assets
Downtown Physical Analysis: Liabilities
Review of Past Downtown Planning and Development Proposals
The section entitled "Downtown Improvement Policies for Pontiac" consists of a series of policies.
Each policy is set forth as the topic sentence of a paragraph; the body of each paragraph elaborates
on the basis for and/or the meaning of the policy. The sections entitled "Planning Principles for
Downtown Pontiac" and "Architectural Principles for Downtown Pontiac" are structured in the same
way as the policy section, and they are incorporated into the policy section by reference. The
remaining three sections provide useful background information. The two "Downtown Physical
Analysis" sections provide exactly the information their titles imply. The "Review of Past Downtown
Planning and Development Proposals" focuses primarily on the decade of the 1980's, a very active
decade for downtown planning in Pontiac.
The downtown improvement policies emerged from a collaboration between the Pontiac Planning
Division staff, the Pontiac Planning Commission, the Pontiac Growth Group and the consultant
planners. Robert K Swarthout, AICP served as lead consultant for putting together the policies.
Mr. Edmund N. Bacon, FAIA played a key idea-development role; he worked closely with Mr.
Swarthout, the Planning Division staff and the Planning Commission. Mr. Bacon brought to the
Pontiac planning effort the experience gained from a long career of successful downtown urban
design and revitalization work. He served as chief planner for the City of Philadelphia for three
decades. His work there led to a Time magazine cover story about him and his downtown
revitalization efforts. Since leaving Philadelphia, Mr. Bacon has served as a consultant to cities all
over the world. A June 1988 article in the New York Times called Mr. Bacon "...one of the most
celebrated city planners of modern times." Mr. Bacon is the author of Design of Cities, one of the
most widely used and cited books on urban design theory. It is required reading in virtually every
urban planning and design graduate program in the country. Mr. Bacon received his training in
architecture at Cornell University and the Cranbrook Academy.

Page 13.1

�DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT POLICIES for PONTIAC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

The city-owned parking lot at the south-west corner of Saginaw and Huron Streets should
be developed with a mixed-use structure that includes office and other uses such as
entertainment or restaurant cluster; the new use or uses should be in a "showstopper"
building. It would be desirable if a restaurant cluster or major entertainment use could be coupled
with office or other uses in one building developed immediately. However, early development of a
restaurant cluster or major entertainment use in a "showstopper" building at the comer of Huron
and Saginaw Streets followed by subsequent development of a new office or mixed-use building on
the site west of the alley would be satisfactory. The size of the office and/or mixed-use buildings
could be approximately the same as the office buildings at the Phoenix Center. Parking decks could
be constructed below grade, or above the retail level. Office facilities could be constructed above the
retail level, or above the parking, if parking is constructed above the retail. The entertainment uses
could be partly below grade if there is a dramatic street entrance. The restaurant cluster or
entertainment uses must have direct access to the enclosed pedestrian mall. Other uses in the
building should also have access to the mall. Parking could also be provided in a municipal lot or
structure in the block bounded by Clinton, Wayne, Lawrence and Wide Track Drive West. An
illustration of this concept is provided in Figure 13.1.
An enclosed pedestrian mall should be developed in the alley west of Saginaw between
Huron and Pike Streets. Such a mall could be the focus of an entertainment district that would
compete for expenditures currently made by Oakland County residents throughout the county and
even in downtown Detroit. It could provide direct access to entertainment uses and related retail
uses. It could also serve office uses. Initially the enclosed mall could extend the two blocks between
Pike Street and Huron. Eventually, it should link the Phoenix Center to whatever use takes over
the old Masonic Temple building at Saginaw and Lafayette. A substantial entertainment facility or
entertainment-office facility at Saginaw and Huron will function as an anchor for a pedestrian mall.
A second anchor could be developed on the urban renewal land between Pike Street and the Phoenix
Center. This second anchor could be linked to the Phoenix Center. The pedestrian mall could
provide all weather access to restaurant, night club, retail and office uses. The mall concept was
developed by Mr. Bacon and the other members of the consultant team early in the planning process.
They subsequently learned that a downtown property owner and restaurateur had the same vision,
though on a less ambitious scale. The property owner had reason to believe that the right facilities
could attract customers to downtown Pontiac; his gourmet restaurant had been attracting lunch and
dinner customers from locations deep in adjoining suburbs. The planning team's illustration of the
mall concept appears in Figure 13.2. An illustration of the property owner's concept appears in
Figure 13.4. Figure 13.3 shows the origin of patrons at the gourmet restaurant.
~

I
I
I

•
•

•
•
•
•II

II
II
II

A grand staircase should be added to the north facade of the Phoenix Center parking lot at
the end of Saginaw Street. The staircase should be Pontiac's version of the Spanish Steps. It
should provide an attractive terminus for Saginaw Street and it should be designed to provide a
viewing grandstand for parades and special events to be held on Saginaw Street. Parades and
festivals are an important part of a successful downtown. So too is a place from which to watch such
special events as well as every day comings and goings. The illustration in Figure 13.5 depicts the
staircase as one concept for the staircase.
The downtown land use pattern should follow the basic outline set forth in the three
options shown in Figures 13.6, 13. 7 and 13.8. Any one or a combination of two or all three of
these options would produce a highly viable downtown. The three differ in only minor ways. All
three options provide a compact retail core oriented to the north-south alley between Saginaw and
Wayne Streets. This alley is envisioned as an enclosed pedestrian mall, ultimately extending to the

Page 13.2

11111

�historic Masonic building at Oakland and Lafayette. All three options provide for the retail core to
be flanked by office and institutional uses. All three options provide for: intensive mixed-use
development around the Phoenix Center. This mixed-use &lt;levelopment is to provide a link between
the Phoenix Center and the alley mall about which the compact retail core clusters. All three options
provide for a substantial amount of residential development. Areas dedicated to residential
development are shown at both the north and south ends of downtown. Two of the options provide
for higher intensity development in the north end. One of the three provides for office development
instead of residential development on either side of Oakland north of Lafayette.

In general, new development and public infrastructure improvements should conform to
the "Planning Principles for Downtown Pontiac" set forth beginning on page 13.26 of this
plan. The downtown planning principles are grouped into the following topical arrangements:
Downtown Access Principle;
Physical Environment Principles;
Compact Mix of Use Principles;
Parking Principles;
Vehicular Circulation Principle;
Office and Institutional Use Principles;
Retail Uses Principles;
Housing Principles; and
Culture, Entertainment and Special Event Principles.
Some of these principles are demonstrated in Figures 13.6 through 13.11. Additional illustrations
are referenced and included with the discussion that begins on page 13.26.

In general, new development and modifications to existing development should conform to
the downtown architectural principles set forth below and described more fully beginning
on page 13.35 of this plan component. The downtown architectural principles are:
Overall Physical Order Principle;
Street Space Continuity Principle;
Traditional and Historic Architecture Principles and Guidelines;
Traditional and Historic Renovation Guidelines;
Infill Principles and Guidelines;
Infill Development Guidelines; and
Sign Principles.
Some of these principles are demonstrated in Figures 13.9 through 13. 11. Additional illustrations
are referenced and included with the discussion that begins on page 13.35.

Downtown Pontiac's existing historic buildings should be preserved because they are
unique assets which can help the city overcome downtown development negatives. The
historic significance of downtown buildings is almost self evident. Many downtown buildings are
either on or worthy of the National Register. In Chapter 11 of this plan, Edward Francis, F AIA,
Michigan's leading historic preservation architect, provided testimony for the importance and value
of historic buildings in downtown Pontiac. While helping to develop the land use and urban design
concepts for this chapter, Edmund N. Bacon, F AIA testified to the important aesthetic value of
downtown Pontiac's historic buildings. Mr. Bacon called the historic Pontiac State Bank building as
fine an architectural specimen as he had seen anywhere.

Page 13.3

�Future development downtown should be integrated with the historic fabric of existing
buildings and streets. New development should be fully integrated into the existing development
pattern, including the basic street grid of the downtown as established by Saginaw and Huron and
the streets which parallel these streets. Every new development should make substantial use of the
opportunities inherent in its own site to become part of the existing urban fabric. New buildings
which fail to do this should not be permitted. Where possible, future projects should help link the
Phoenix Center to the historic fabric of downtown. This policy is in keeping with the plans prepared
by the Pontiac Planning Division in the mid 1980's; but this policy means abandoning the New
Pontiac Plan concept of the early 1980's. That concept called for the total remaking of the downtown
in the image of a suburban office plaza. The Pontiac Planning Division Plans of the mid 1980's are
shown in Figures 13.12 through 13.14. The New Pontiac Plan concept is shown in Figure 13.15. An
example of a proposed building which does not relate to the existing fabric is shown in Figure 13.16.
The employment base this proposed building would have generated would have been a positive, but
its urban design impact would have been a negative.

An intensive system of pedestrian circulation should extend beyond the enclosed retailentertainment mall. The system should include enclosed and climate controlled pedestrian
concourses as well as attractive sidewalks. Potential components of such a system are illustrated in
Figures 13.9 through 13.11.
Major appearance and functional improvements should be made to downtown by both the
private and public sectors. Most important of these improvements are:
rigorous building code enforcement to bring all stores and offices up to current safety
standards;
facade renovations with city financial help if need be and with state and/or other help if
possible;
streetscape improvements , including replacing old curbs and sidewalks with wide, attractive
walkways, barrier-free curbs, planters, new lighting and other pedestrian amenities; and
circulation improvements, partially in the form of a pedestrian skyway system, to link the
Phoenix Center, senior citizen center, the Saginaw Street office and financial hub, the
municipal complex and the transportation center.

City-owned parking lots and structures should be clt!signed and constructed in accordance
with the highest standard of amenity. Screening and landscaping should exceed the standards
applicable to privately-owned parking areas. They should be well maintained.
Vacant city-owned redevelopment sites should be maintained in park-like condition until
they are developed. An unkempt appearance conveys the impression that downtown Pontiac is not
thought to be a very valuable or important place. If this is how the public sector views downtown, it
is not very likely that the private sector will have a different view.
Downtown properties controlled by the City of Pontiac already should be used to stimulate
revitalization. This property is concentrated in the blocks bounded by Lawrence, Perry, Water,
Saginaw, Pike and Wayne. Approximately 70,000 square feet or 28 percent of the site area of these
blocks is owned or otherwise controlled by the city.

Page 13.4

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
II

�Potential revenue source for downtown improvement should be employed through bonding
Tax Increment Financing revenues. Prelimina ry analys es complete1 for the Pontiac Growth
Group indicate that downtown appearance improvements could be funded from a variety of sources
in an amount between $27,000,000 and $37 ,000,000. (See page 13.51 for a more detailed description
of the sources.)

A downtown property management authority should be established to centralize
maintenance and improvement decision-making. The authority should also control the mix of
tenants permitted within its jurisdiction.

Economic development efforts should target those uses which have been identified as being
most likely to find downtown Pontiac a good economic environment. These uses include the
following:
Entertainment and restaurants;
Smaller ''back-office" and service firms;
Health care;
Government offices;
Service and specialty retail;
Townhouse and apartment residential; and
Artists ' studios and residences.
Entertainment uses and restaurant uses are the most promising prospects for the immediate future.
The city should put major emphasis on attracting these uses so long as they represent the prime
prospects.

Pontiac should place emphasis on medium sized, incremental development of projects
which can be realized as individual entities and function as an integral part of the
existing downtown fabric. Downtown should not close the door on the prospects for a major
market inducing mixed-use project; however, in recognition of the limited success of such projects
outside major central city cores and also because of the high public expenditure normally required to
make such a project feasible, the city should not place major hope on such projects. Efforts to
stimulate downtown development should not include preparation of market studies which show
demand contingent on changes to downtown that have not yet been made or irrevocably budgeted.
A highly visible effort to reduce crime should be concentrated in the downtown. Crime and
the perception of crime chases away desirable residents, customers and workers, particularly female
workers. Foot patrol and/or motor scooter patrols should be part of the effort. Consideration could
also be given to mounted police. Mounted police add a distinctive feature to any downtown. They
provide a sense of security that can be gotten in no other way. However, the costs of providing
mounted patrols will be high, perhaps beyond the city's reach. A separate mounted division might be
prohibitive. Possibly mounts can be provided by private contractors more economically than by
maintaining a full mounted division.

Page 13.5

�I
I
I
I
I

Figure 13.1
SHOW-STOPPER ENTERTAINMENT and
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

•
•
•
•
•
•
•II

\

II

Opposite Page Above: A "show-stopper" building is needed at the corner of Saginaw and Huron
where there is now a city parking lot. The building preferably would be home to an entertainment
facility such as a fine restaurant, nightclub or sports bar. The illustration shows the building in
Roman Colosseum I Post Modern style; this style is illustrative and not mandatory. The fenestration
and facia lines on the east facade have been carefully aligned with the adjacent facade to the south
on Saginaw; this design feature is mandatory. The intersection is lighted with stadium-type lights to
emphasize Pontiac's image as a sports town, home to the Detroit Lions and neighbor to the Detroit
Pistons. Just west of the "show-stopper" is the Huron entrance to the pedestrian concourse
illustrated in Figure 13.2. To the west of that is a new high-rise office tower. Planning and
architectural concepts by Robert K Swarthout, AICP; Edmund N. Bacon, FAIA and Richard Conway
Meyer, AIA Design rendering by Richard Conway Meyer.

Ill
1111
1111

Opposite Page Below: A hypothetical interior of the entertainment use illustrated above. Design
rendering by Richard Conway Meyer, AIA

1111
Page 13.6

1111
--

.;;

-

-·

�.. -----~
,.;,,.,.;~.:
~

.

../

·;-..:

,:......r:'",

:

~

.

-✓-. :-- ..

,

...,,, -

Page 13.7

�Figure 13.2
ENCLOSED RETAIL-ENTERTAINMENT-OFFICE MALL
Consultant Planners Concept
Opposite Page Above: The plan envisions an enclosed pedestrian mall in the alley west of Saginaw
Street between Huron and Pike Streets. Such a mall could be the focus of an entertainment district
that would compete for expenditures currently made by Oakland County residents throughout the
county and even in downtown Detroit. It could provide direct access to entertainment uses and
related retail uses. It could also serve office uses. Initially the enclosed mall could extend the two
blocks between Pike and Huron Streets. Eventually, it should link the Phoenix Center to whatever
use takes over the old Masonic Temple building at Saginaw and Lafayette Streets. A substantial
restaurant cluster or entertainment/office facility at Saginaw and Huron Streets will function as an
anchor for a pedestrian mall. A second anchor could be developed on the urban renewal land
between Pike Street and the Phoenix Center. This second anchor could be linked to the Phoenix
Center. The pedestrian mall could provide all-weather access to restaurant, night club, retail and
office uses. Planning and architectural concepts by Robert K Swarthout, AICP; Edmund N. Bacon,
FAIA and Richard Conway Meyer, AIA Design rendering by Richard Conway Meyer.

Figure 13.3
GRAND STAIRCASE at the END of SAGINAW STREET
Opposite Page Below: A grand staircase should be added to the north facade of the Phoenix Center
parking lot at the end of Saginaw Street. The staircase should be Pontiac's version of the Spanish
Steps. It should replace the blank wall parking structure which now dominates the view with an
attractive terminus for Saginaw Street. The staircase should also provide a viewing grandstand for
parades, festivals and other special events to be held on Saginaw Street. One possible special event:
A Transportation Parade of Progress which could start with an Indian on horseback drawing a litter,
end with the successful University of Michigan solar car and feature every manner of personal
transportation in between. Such special events are an important part of a successful downtown. So
too is a place from which to watch them and a place to watch everyday comings and goings. The
illustration depicts the staircase sculpted to look like two hood ornaments facing each other. This
stylistic homage to the city's automotive past is optional. Planning and architectural concepts by
Robert K Swarthout, AICP; Edmund N. Bacon, FAIA and Richard Conway Meyer, AIA Design
rendering by Richard Conway Meyer.

Page 13.8

I
I
I
I
I

•
•
•
•II

II
II
II
II

"
-

1111

�Page 13.9

�Figure 13.4
ENCLOSED RETAIL-ENTERTAINMENT-MALL
Downtown Property Owner's Concept
Opposite Page Above: The enclosed pedestrian mall independently envisioned by Mr. Bacon and the
other members of the planning team had been previously envisioned by a downtown property owner
and restaurateur. This property owner commissioned an architect's rendering of the concept, a bird's
eye view of which is shown opposite above. The property owner had reason to believe that the right
facilities could attract customers to downtown Pontiac; his gourmet restaurant had been attracting
lunch and dinner customers from locations deep in adjoining suburbs, as is illustrated in Figure 13.3.
The property owner's concept encompassed only the alley from Pike Street to Lawrence, making it
considerably less ambitious than the planners concept which envisioned an ultimate extension from
the Phoenix Center to the Masonic Temple. The planners strongly believe that their more expansive
proposal is necessary to long range success. Design rendering by Peterhansrea.
Opposite Page Below: Interior of the downtown property owner's retail-entertainment mall concept.
Design rendering by Peterhansrea.

\

Page 13.10

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II

II

�,... ,

J"
.

,

I

, ·

,.: ,..

. ,, .•

I,,,-, :.. .-

Page 13.11

�Figure 13.5
ORIGIN of CUSTOMERS for QUALITY DOWNTOWN RESTAURANT
This map reproduces a large map that was displayed on an easel in the entryway of a downtown
Pontiac restaurant. Customers were asked to place a pin on the map to indicate where they came
from. The dots represent locations indicated. They clearly indicate that customers will come to
Pontiac from locations deep into adjoining suburbs, suburbs which have some of the highest per
capita disposable incomes in the country.

..

.-..
.

..

0

...'

.. . .
. ..•
... . .

....

•
•I

6 MILES

. ..
. ..

t

I •••

...

..

...

·.

.·

:"

...

..
.
•••,,

Page 13.12

..

I
I
I
I
I

:s

I
I
I
I
I

II
II

..

.. ..
I ••

..

..

"'

II

�Figure 13.6
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OPTION 1

-

Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Specialty Retail/Entertainment

VA

Retail/Office/High Density Residential

~

Office and Institutional

I

P

I

Public Parking
Open Space

r
Page 13.13

�I
I
I
I
I
I

Figure 13.7
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OPTION 2

-

--

Specialty Retail/Entertainment
Retail/Office/High Density Residential

~

Office and Institutional

I

Public Parking

I

Open Space

Page 13.14

II
II

High Density Residential

VA
P

•
•
•
•
•II

r

111

11

111
111

�Figure 13.8
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OPTION 3

High Density Residential
Specialty Retail/Entertainment

!11C1uJ

Enclosed Pedestrian Mall

l?QJ

Retail/Office/High Density Residential

~

I

W22J

Office and Institutional

I

Public Parking

P

I

~~,...

Open Space
Open Space Above Parking

Page 13.15

�I '

...

'

~

-,

\

8

'

\

I,

\

,.

4"."/""""f•~

I.·-•

II

·'\ '._

..
- • '---=====-·,

\

I

',

.__-14..:... • I'

\' EJO _ .
'
I'-

-

·,r==·-"- JlJ·
m;· ·

---

11

11
r.1-::-2----'

.

I

'

\.

12

I
I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II

\ ·,

..

·"

'

\

12

16

14

: -~-·; ,.....
I

if
:. .. ff,'

i...:

/
'
' ,.. - .......~
\

Page 13.16

.

.J

i

I

----0

200

1'
600

"
"

11
11

Ill

�Figure 13.9
DOWNTOWN URBAN DESIGN:
CENTRAL AREA CONCEPTS
Opposite Page

Furlong Building, but this would cost the demolition of a
building with historic merit. The realignment produces
open space and parking sites; the parking sites could serve
the Furlong Building and/or the church structure at
University and Mill .

Notes for Figure 13.9

8.
Public parking decks should be constructed
to serve all four quadrants of downtown. Lots may precede
decks in accordance with demand.

1.
The east end of the city-owned parking lot at
the south-west corner of Saginaw and Hw-on should be
developed with a major entertainment use or with a mixeduse structure that includes entertainment office and other
uses; the new use or uses should be in a "showstopper"
building. Site 1 development could be independent of Site 2
development, or the two sites could be developed at the
same time with one structw-e. Below grade or above grade
structured parking could be included, provided that the
street level is reserved for retail functions. The design of
the building should afford direct enclosed pedestrian access
to proposed pedestrian mall described in number 3 below.

2.
The west end of the city-owned parking lot
should be developed with a mixed-use structw-e that
includes entertainment, office and other uses; the new use
or uses should be in a "showstopper" building. Site 2
development could be independent of Site 1 development, or
the two sites could be developed at the same time with one
structure. Below grade or above grade structured parking
could be included, provided that the street level is reserved
for retail functions. The design oftb.e building should afford
direct enclosed pedestrian access to proposed pedestrian
mall described in number 3 below.
3.
An enclosed pedestrian mall should be
developed in the alley west of Saginaw between Hw-on and
Pike Streets. The mall should provide all-weather access to
buildings between Huron and Pike. Later, it should extend
south of Pike to connect to the Phoenix Center and planned
new development between the Phoenix Center and Pike.
Ultimately it should extend north of Huron, preferably with
a bridge above street level.
4.
The vacant lot between the alley and
Saginaw should be enclosed to link the mall to Saginaw
Street. The existing lot is immediately opposite the newly
renovated Strand Theater.
5.
A grand staircase should be added to the
north facade of the Phoenix Center parking lot at the end of
Saginaw Street. It should provide an attractive and
visually exciting terminus to the view down Saginaw Street.
It should also provide a viewing platform from which to
watch parades and the everyday comings and goings on
Saginaw. It will be Pontiac's version of the Spanish Steps.
6.
The intersection of Saginaw and Hw-on
should be developed with special pavement and street
lighting. The design should create a unique space through
which motorists and pedestrians can pass. It should
announce to them, "You have an-ived at an important
place."
7.
University should be realigned to better
bring west bound M-59 traffic through downtown. A more
gradual curve than the one shown could pass through the

9.
A public parking deck at the site of the
Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital surface lot could serve the
hospital and other sw-rounding uses, including uses on the
west side of Saginaw. This lot may not be an absolute
necessity because of the existing public lot on the block
bounded by Lawrence, Mill, Pike and Perry. However, it is
at least highly desirable because it would provide more
convenient parking for its closest neighbors.
10.
The enclosed pedestrian mall proposed for
the north-south alley between Hw-on and Pike (see number
3 above) should extend south of Pike to the Phoenix Center.
The extension should link directly to new development on
the vacant land north of the Phoenix Center (see numbers
11-15).
11.
Low-rise entertainment, retail and/or office
uses should be developed on these sites. The new buildings
should be linked to the enclosed pedestrian mall (see
number 10). They should be built to the street line, where
they should be a maximum of two or three stories in height.
The Saginaw and Pike Street facades should be compatible
with existing histo1;c architecture. Designs should be based
on the section of this plan entitled "Architectural Principles
for Downtown Pontiac."

12.
Intensive entertainment, retail and/or office
uses should be developed on these sites. A hotel would also
be desirable. High-rise construction or a mix of high-rise
and low-rise const1uction is possible. The new buildings
should be linked to the enclosed pedestrian mall (see
number 10). The facades should be compatible with
existing historic architecture. Designs should be based on
the section of this plan entitled "Architectural Principles for
Downtown Pontiac."
13.
Low-rise entertainment, retail and/or office
uses should be developed on this site. The new building
should be built to the street line at Water Street, where it
should be a maximum of two or three stories in height. The
Water Street facade should be compatible with existing
historic architecture. The design should be based on the
section of this plan entitled" Architectural Principles for
Downtown Pontiac."

14.
Intensive entertainment, retail and/or office
uses should be developed on this site. A hotel would also be
desirable. High-rise construction is desirable. The
development could be integrated into the structure proposed
for site 13. The facades should be compatible with existing
historic architecture. The design should be based on the
section of this plan entitled• Architectural Principles for
Downtown Pontiac."
15.

A new office structure could be developed at

this site .

Page 13.17

�lG.
The garden on Lop of the Phoenix Center
parking deck should be redesigned to include an outdoor
Lrce-lined mall oriented to Saginaw Street.

architecture on Saginaw Street. The desi~ should be
hased on the section of this plan entitled "Architectural
Principles for Downtown Pontiac."

17.
The parking lot west of the library should be
extended and organized on the Saginaw-Huron grid, i.e.
parking bays, tree rows and screen walls should be parallel
lo the center lines of these streets.

2G.
The north end of downtown should be
redeveloped with new residential uses. The structures
should be pa1·allel to the center lines of Saginaw and Huron
Streets. Concept for this residential development are
shown in Figures 13.10 and 13.11.

18.
A new olTice or institution,a l structure could
be constructed on this site. Mid-rise or even high-rise
development would be desirable. The design should be
based on the section of this plan entitled "Architectural
Principles for Downtown Pontiac."

19.
The parking lot east of Michigan Bell and
Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital should be redesigned to orient
to the Saginaw-Huron grid with parking bays, tree rows
and screen walls parallel to the center lines of these streets.
A parking structure could be constructed if necessary.

20.
Low-rise entertainment, retail and/or office
uses should be developed on this site. The new buildings
should be built to the street line at Pike Street, where it
should be a maximum of two or three stories in height. The
facade should be compatible with existing historic
architecture. The design should be bru;ed on the section of
this plan entitled "Architectural P1;nciples for Downtown
Pontiac."
21.
An enclosed pedestrian mall should be
developed in the alley west of Saginaw between Huron and
the historic Masonic Temple structure at Lafayette. The
mall should provide all-weather access to buildings between
Huron and Lafayette. It should connect to the mall to the
south of Huron (see number 3), preferably with a bridge
above street level rather than with just an at-grade
pedestrian crosswalk.
22.
This site should be developed with a mixeduse structure that includes entertainment, office and other
uses. The design of the building should afford direct
enclosed pedestrian access to the proposed pedestrian mall
described in number 20 above. Below grade or above grade
structured parking could be included, provided that the
mall level is reserved for retail functions. The design
should be based on the section of this plan entitled
"Architectural Principles for Downtown Pontiac."

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

23.
Low-rise office uses should be developed on
this site. The new building should be built to the street line
at Huron Street, where it should be a maximum of two or
three stories in height. The facades should be compatible
with existing historic architecture on Huron Street. The
design should be based on the section of this plan entitled
"Architectural Principles for Downtown Pontiac."

24.
A parking lot could serve new and existing
development. It should be oriented to the Saginaw-Huron
grid, i.e. parking bays, tree rows and screen walls should be
parallel to the center lines of these streets.
25.
Low-rise entertainment, retail and/or office
uses should be developed on these sites. The new buildings
should be built to the street line at Saginaw Street, where
they should be a maximum of two or three stories in height.
The facades should be compatible with existing historic

Page 13.18

11

�~

t:ll-rl
0 ....

~~

z11

t-3

('ti

0~
~izO

::0
t.r.l
r.n

-z
t:l

t.r.l

t-3

~

C!

::0

ti:,

~
t:l

-z
t.r.l

r.n
0

(")

0

z(")
t.r.l
"'Cl

NOTE THAT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALIGNS WITH THE
SIGINAW-HURON STREET GRID, I.e. BUILDING WALLS ARE
PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINES OF lliOSE STREETS.

0'

KEY:
1.

2.

I

TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL
w~h attached garage and privalo courtyards
TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL
two stories above at grade garage

"'Cl
I))

~

....
....t0~

3.

GARDEN APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL
three stories above underground private parking

4.

NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN SPACE

5.

RETAIN EXISTING STRUCTURES lor OFFICE USE

j
O 1aat

500 feel

\

t-3

....

�"'C

t:,

1-'rj

~

0 ...

......

c:.o

zt-3 "I

0

0~

~~

~

(II

~

~i-,.

z ...
~

t/)

t:,
~

~

~

§

0

0

~

t:,

-z
~

rn

LAFAYETTE

0

C':l

0

z

C':l
~

NOTE THAT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALIGNS WITH THE
SIGINAW·HURON STREET GRID, ie. BUILDING WAU.S ARE
PARAU.EL TO THE CENTER LINES OF THOSE STREETS .

"'C

0

KEY:

I.

2.

t-3

J

Ill

TOWNHOU SE RESIDENTIAL
wRh anached ga,age and private courtyards
TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL
two stories above at grade garage

3.

MID -RISE o&lt; HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL

4.

PARKING STRUCTURE
for md*rcse or high-nse res idential

5.

NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN SPACE

6.

RETAIN EXISTING STRUCTURES for OFFICE USE

j
0feet

500 feel

I

I:,:)

�Figure 13.12
PLANNING DIVISION DOWNTOWN CONCEPT 1
circa 1985

Schematic I
Pedestrian / Service Mall
Public Parking
Public Parking Mall
Existing Development
New Development

Page 13.21

�I
I
I
I

Figure 13.13
PLANNING DIVISION DOWNTOWN CONCEPT 2
circa 1985

I
I
I

-

Schematic II
Enclosed Mall
Pedestrian Skyway
Pedestrian / Service Mall
Public Parking
Existing Development
New Development

Page 13.22

�Figure 13.14
PLANNING DMSION DOWNTOWN CONCEPT~
circa 1985

z-··'CJ. ~

QNST.

_ _ __ ,

-

. ,_
.

Cl)

·_: i5

. .,..::
~ ::,.w

P

'.~ ii

- c
'----=-=
.

p .
.,;

-

(J

~

t;;

.

'

0

.

~

Schematic III

[B

Pedestrian Skyway

~

Pedestrian/ Service Mall

0

Public Parking

-

Existing Development

D

New Development

r
Page 13.23

�Figure 13.15
NEW PONTIAC PL
circa 1980
AN CONCEPT

...l

·:\ I

-·--__.,
\"r

:.1

,.

0

-D

_ ..l

~

.

~

,

'

:

\

;

t~·
'

-

u

-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Existing Buildings
Proposed Buildings
Proposed Plaza

Page 13.24

I

�Figure 13.16
OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAL
circa 1985

,

\

'

I

0

I

\

\

200

\

:1'
600

Page 13.25

�PLANNING PRINCIPLES for DOWNTOWN P O N T I A C - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Downtown Access Principle:
The trip downtown should be comfortable and pleasant. In Pontiac this means that the roads
must be adequate and lined with reasonably attractive development. If regional train service ever
returns to Pontiac, then there should be a direct and pleasant connection between downtown and the
station. The pedestrian bridge which now links the station to the Phoenix Center provides an
opportunity to fulfill this necessity.
Physical Environment Principles:
The overall physical environment must be of high quality; it is better to limit the area over
which such improvements are made than to spread funds too thin. There is no room for slum
and blight. Private buildings and grounds must be neat and well maintained. So should public
buildings and grounds. Public open space amenities must be at a high level. Public space amenities
should be budgeted to ensure the best quality and the most maintenance free and longest life
possible.

Compact Mix of Use Principles:
A mixture of complementary activities must be concentrated in downtown. The activities in
such a mixture reinforce each other, but only once a "critical mass" is achieved. The mixture of uses
can generate enough pedestrian activity to make public spaces secure and lively and therefore
desirable. Diversity means more than one or two uses. The most important activities for downtown
are:
Offices and office services;
Technical research functions compatible with office facilities;
Retailing;
Hotels and conference centers;
Housing;
Performing arts;
Artists' studios and residences;
Entertainment and recreation; and
Special events.
\

The mixture of complementary activities must be balanced. No one use should dominate the
others. Overconcentration of office uses is particularly to be avoided since they empty out after 5:00
PM leaving any areas they dominate deserted. Heavy activity generators should be evenly
distributed so that the benefits of their activities are spread over a broader area. Downtown Pontiac
already has an overconcentration of office uses at the Phoenix Center. The solution is not to prohibit
more office development, but to have new office concentrations located a distance from the Phoenix
Center and to add a greater diversity of uses.
The downtown must be small, compact and intensely developed. Compactness is essential for
the synergistic relationship between different land uses and the pedestrian activity which makes a
downtown a downtown. In Pontiac, the first priority must be to fill the existing gaps in the street
facade, particularly at high visibility locations. A first class, show-stopper building should be built
on the parking lot site at the comer of Huron and Saginaw. The several vacant lots on the west side

Page 13.26

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

�of Saginaw between Huron and Pike should be developed. A link should be established between the
Phoenix Center to the rest of downtown.

Office, retail and other development must be located very close together and have pleasant
pedestrian linkages. The very best downtown office-retail configuration is a highly concentrated
retail area offering substantial shopping opportunities surrounded by intensive office development.
Studies have shown that most office workers will not travel more than nine minutes to get to
downtown retail. The outer core of the office development should be about nine minutes or 1,000 feet
from the most distant portion of the shopping core. Such a configuration can capture substantial
retail expenditures from the office workers. The ideal pattern usually cannot be achieved because of
existing constraints. Where there are constraints, a good pattern puts shopping between two or
more office cores separated by not more than 1,000 feet. The pattern in Pontiac, with office uses
located a long distance from the potential retail space, is the worst configuration.
Parking Principle:
There must be adequate, visible and accessible parking that connects directly with the
intensive pedestrian circulation system. Parking lots and structures must be easily visible from
the main vehicular circulation system serving downtown. They should be well designed and well
maintained. Landscaping should be exemplary rather than just to the minimum standards required
for privately owned parking lots. The relationship of municipal lots to the core pedestrian circulation
system should be clear. In downtown Pontiac, parking is not now well related to the core. It is
concentrated in a huge and foreboding deck which is too far from potential retail concentrations.
Furthermore, many municipal parking lots are unattractive. A parking study of the commercial core
of downtown was completed by the city's Planning and Community Renewal Division in March,
1984. For purposes of the study, the commercial core was defined to consist of most of the business
district north of the Phoenix Center. An inventory performed for that study identified 2,795 spaces
in the commercial core. The spaces were divided fairly evenly between spaces in privately owned lots
and public spaces provided by the city. The 1,429 spaces provided by the city were distributed as
follows:
555 spaces (39 percent) in the parking deck between Perry and Mill Streets, and Lawrence
and Pike Streets,
702 spaces (49 percent) in off-street parking lots spread throughout the core, and
172 spaces (12 percent) on-street spaces, mostly consisting of the diagonal parking stalls
located on Saginaw.
The study indicated a future deficiency of 1,671 spaces. This result was based on the assumptions
that the total available non-residential floor space would be occupied at some point in the future,
that 300 feet is a maximum walking distance, that no new buildings would be constructed which
incorporated parking or had higher floor area ratios than the existing structures on those sites. The
study did not take into consideration parking needs for projects to be built on the vacant
redevelopment parcels adjacent to the Phoenix Center. It anticipated that the parking needs of
these projects would be met on site. Such a study is useful for planning immediate needs, but it
must be updated periodically as new development potentials arise. The 1984 parking needs study
does not provide recommendations appropriate to the development pattern proposed by this plan,
which calls for an intensification ofretail, office, and other uses north of the Phoenix Center and
north of Huron.

Page 13.27

�Recommended parking locations appropriate to the development alternatives proposed by this plan
are set forth in Figure 13.17. Figure 13.17 shows the location of six new parking structures,
numbered 1-6, to serve three districts, labeled A. B and C. Districts D and E are expected to be
served by the existing 555 car structure bounded by Perry, Mill, Lawrence and Pike and by private
parking areas. Site 6, although located in Area E is intended to serve Area C, to which it is adjacent.
Downtown areas not included in Districts A through F are residential and expected to be served by
on-site parking.

I
I
I

Table 13-1 shows the amount of development that could be accommodated by the proposed parking
locations, based on the assumptions set forth below:
•

Eight floors of structured parking on sites 1, 2, 3 and 4, and five floors on sites 5 and 6.

•

First floor will occupy 85 percent of total site area and 60 percent will be devoted to retail
and entertainment uses.

•

A total of 30 percent of retail parking requirements will be satisfied through shared
parking arrangements and 3.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of site area will be
required (Source: ITE Parking Generation, 1985).

•

Office space will require 2.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet (Source: ITE Parking
Generation, 1985).

•

Existing office space is based on 85 percent of building square footage as usable and 40
percent of first floor area devoted to non-retail uses (Source: Pontiac Central Business
District Parking Study, 1984).

•

Potential new office space is expressed in usable square footage.

These assumptions must be more closely evaluated by detailed parking needs assessments. Such
assessments should be conducted periodically as downtown develops.

Page 13.28

I
I

�Figure 13.17
DOWNTOWN PARKING CONCEPT

01\\
/~I

\iJ
~\\...__

j,

\

l\,~

-

.

- □□
----

:-

l

I
I

-- ..

r
Page 13.29

�Table 13-1
DEVELOPMENT WHICH CAN BE SERVED by PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURES
Maximum
First
Structured
Floor
Retail
Office
Parking
Parking
Space
Retail
(Sq. Ft.)
Spaces (Sq. Ft.) Spaces

Existing
Office
Space
(Sq. Ft.)

Potential
New Office
Space
(Sq. Ft.)

Maximum

FAR
(All Uses)

Area A

1,472

33,647

73

559,600

61,468

498,132

2.87

Area B

1,472

109,064

237

494,000

186,295

307,705

1.83

Area C

2,994

149,456

325

1,067,600

403,528

664,072

3.35

Total

5,938

292,167

635

2,121,200

651,291

1,469,909

2.68

Vehicular Circulation Principle:
There must be a clearly articulated system of vehicular circulation with adequate lanes
and intersection geometrics. Many downtown vehicular circulation plans incorporate a
circumferential or ring road around the downtown. Most major shopping malls and many large
office parks are planned with such a feature. In Pontiac, Wide Track Drive is the major
circumferential road. However, in addition to serving as the downtown's circumferential road, it also
serves as part of the state trunk line system. Opinion of experts differ about the efficacy of Wide
Track Drive's combination of ring-road and trunk-line functions and the particular configuration
that has been designed to serve that combination of functions. Wide Track Drive's chief positives are
that it facilitates substantial traffic flow and it clearly articulates a downtown district. Its chief
negatives are that it isolates downtown from the rest of the city and that its one-way circulation
pattern makes access into the downtown difficult. In any case, Wide Track Drive is clearly given to
which future planning must adjust. Wide Track Drive's liabilities must be minimized and its assets
must be augmented. The effort to do this should be based on a clear overall circulation plan which
provides adequate lanes for traffic moving to all points on the compass and on adequate intersection
geometrics. A good overall structure was envisioned in 1984, Downtown Pontiac Traffic and
Circulation Study prepared by Goodell and Grivas, Incorporated. That study also recommended
specific intersection improvements. The study was predicated on the "ambitious" development
concept proposed by the American City Corporation in 1984 (see page 13.54); it did not give detailed
consideration to the potential impact of more intensive downtown development at locations not
directly part of the American City Corporation scheme. Therefore, not all of the Goodell and Grivas
recommendations will be valid for other development configurations. Goodell and Grivas
recommendations which can be expected to remain valid for the development concepts proposed by
this plan include:
Construct an underpass for vehicular traffic using Huron Street at the Detroit Grand Haven
and Milwaukee Railroad.
Complete the high volume counter-clockwise traffic loop around the business district by
improving the intersection of Auburn with northbound Wide Track Drive. Properly designed,
this will provide an attractive alternate route for east bound vehicles that currently cut
through the business district on Huron. This concept is illustrated in Figure 13.18.

Page 13.30

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

i
i

�Establish a high capacity clockwise loop insi&lt;le of Wide Track Drive by using Lafayette
(eastbound), Perry (southbound), Pike (westbound, and Wayne Lnorthbowid). Provide
appropriate channelization to facilitate turns at the comers. Provide appropriate
signalization and traffic control signs. This system provides a logical ''backwards" flow to the
movements on Wide Track Drive and provides alternate routes that divert traffic from the
Huron-Saginaw intersection. This concept is illustrated in Figure 13.18.
Increase turn lanes and even provide for channelized turning at key intersections. Key
intersections that Goodell and Grivas anticipated would need improvement were: Auburn
and Wide Track Drive East, Huron and Wide Track Drive East, University and Wide Track
Drive East, Oakland and Wide Track Drive West, Huron and Wide Track Drive West, and
Orchard Lake and Wide Track Drive West. These intersections are likely to need
improvement in order to accommodate any intensification of downtown development. The
exact nature of the necessary improvements must ultimately be determined based on specific
development proposals. The land use configurations of this plan could be the basis for
preliminary determinations.
Manage signalization timing and install traffic control signs to facilitate traffic flow.
Implement all the above recommendations, facilitate the movement of east-bound M-59 truck
traffic around the Wide Track Drive West/Auburn/Wide Track Drive East loop and
discourage movement through downtown. To this Goodell and Grivas recommendation, this
plan adds the suggestion that all through truck traffic should be prohibited from Huron
between Wide Track Drive West and Wide Track Drive East. Goodell and Grivas note that
west-bound M-59 traffic already finds turning geometrics easier on Wide Track Drive and
thus stays off west-bound Huron in the downtown.
Remove angled parking from Saginaw. Goodell and Grivas cited professional research
documenting the danger of angled parking on roads which do much more than provide access
to parking stalls. Saginaw will not be a major through street, but it will have to carry more
traffic than is compatible with angled parking under any substantial development proposal.
The need to remove angled parking will not arise until substantial new development is
actually occupied.
One option that was mentioned but not vigorously recommended by Goodell and Grivas is the
widening and extension of Water Street to Wide Track Drive West. This thoroughfare
"improvement" might well facilitate circulation around downtown and improve access to major
development sites. However, it would further serve to separate the Phoenix Center from the balance
of downtown to the north. For this reason, it should be avoided.

Office and Institutional Use Principles:
Downtown office is necessary to bring people with money to spend into downtown. The
potential for office uses in downtown is virtually unlimited, provided all other factors are right.
Experience shows that downtowns can attract as much as 40 percent of regional office potential. The
"region" from which Pontiac could draw includes northern Oakland County. Downtown Pontiac's
ability to capture a large part of this potential depends on its accessibility and attractiveness as a
physical environment. It also depends on the overall mix of uses that are attracted downtown. As
the total complement of desirable uses increases, the ability to attract other desirable uses increases.
The availability of attractive and well-located competing sites will also influence the degree to which
Pontiac's downtown can realize its theoretical potential. Financial uses are prime office occupants.
When a special office user like General Motors can put a part of its national and international based
work force into downtown, then the potential share of the regional market should be even greater.

Page 13.31

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Figure 13.18
DOWNTOWN CIRCULATION CONCEPT

--==

D

~

Inner Loop One-Way
Clockwise Circulation

0\\ ____, -

oorn ~a□ o□~--oo
l___.li--

~\_ J

Outer Loop One-Way
Counter Clockwise
Circulation

I

Page 13.32
----

-

-·

--·

-

-

-

-

.

---. ..

\~.~"":',:·.'.

--

•
•
•
•
•

-

�,

Retail Uses Principles:
The quality, variety and appropriateness of the downtown retail mix is more important
than the total square footage, which cannot be large in todays competitive retail
environment. A small, attractive retail core will add pedestrian life to downtown and symbolize
economic vitality beyond its actual dollars and cents contribution to the downtown's economic life.
Downtown Pontiac is like most other downtowns in its inability to compete with shopping centers for
comparison goods purchases. However, like other downtowns, it must have a compliment of
convenience, service, restaurant, entertainment and specialty retail uses. The best prospects are:

Specialty Market Place: Such facilities are anchored by food and entertainment uses rather
than department stores. Between 30 and 50 percent of total floor area is devoted to a variety
of different restaurants and fast food outlets which are scattered throughout the area.
Smaller boutiques and specialty shops owned by individual entrepreneurs. Total area ranges
from 50,000 to 150,000 square feet.
Outdoor Farmers Market: Such a facility can attract shoppers from a wide area during the
summer and fall seasons.
Neighborhood Services: Neighborhood services are particularly important to the residential
life of downtown. Such neighborhood services can include grocery and drug stores,
delicatessens, dry cleaners, barber shops and beauty salons.
Successful downtown retail uses respect the universal rules of retailing. These rules are:
maximize visibility,
maximize accessibility,
maximize security,
provide internal circulation,
provide continuity over the entire retail area, and
provide a carefully planned mix of complementary uses.
In addition, it is usually desirable to avoid separate retail centers that compete with each other for
the same downtown expenditures. It is better that similar retail facilities be grouped together so
that they reinforce each other. Finally, a successful downtown retail will have a strong physical link
to office, hotel, cultural and residential customers.

Aggressive public sector support is required for successful downtown retail. Providing upfront money for testing market potential is one way for the public sector to participate. This Pontiac
has done with participation in the successful Pike Street Restaurant and with participation in less
successful development at the Masonic Temple building. Providing parking facilities is another way
for the public sector to support downtown retail. This Pontiac has done, but it probably will have to
do more.

It is necessary to accept the fact that NEW downtown retail concentrations will drain sales
from EXISTING downtown retail facilities. This problem can be minimized by creating linkages
between new and old retail areas and/or by bringing established downtown businesses into new
facilities. Both approaches are relevant for Pontiac.

Page 13.33

�Hotels with banquet and conference facilities are very important to a downtown, and must
often be subsidized by providing free or low cost land. Hotels make downtown accessible to the
out of town visitor. Banquet and conference facilities serve local and regional neects and make
downtown lively. Competition from low cost, outlying sites makes it difficult to attract hotels
downtown often resulting in the necessity to provide a land subsidy. All of the past studies of
downtown Pontiac have recognized the need for hotel facilities. However, current market conditions
are extremely difficult. New competition from facilities at the Oakland Technology Center makes
hotel construction in downtown Pontiac extremely difficult to justify at this time. The overall quality
of the downtown Pontiac environment and the absence at this time of desirable complementary uses
is a severe impediment. It will be necessary for considerable time to pass before the market catches
up with the present supply in competing areas. The overall downtown environment will have to be
improved or improvements will have to be irrevocably budgeted before a quality downtown and
conference center can be attracted to downtown, even with a substantial land subsidy. In the
meantime, the city should continue to plan for one or two downtown hotels and hold urban renewal
or other land in reserve for that purpose.
Housing Principles:

The extended cycle of daily activity generated by housing is essential for a successful
downtown. People occupy their homes 24 hours a day, or 24 hours minus the working hours. For
this reason, housing can make downtown a lively, peopled place virtually all the time. This in turn
attracts other uses to the downtown and non-residents to spend their money downtown. Senior
citizens are desirable downtown residents, but it is important to have more than just scenario
citizens downtown. Seniors by themselves tend not to venture from their apartments enough to
people the downtown streetscape.
It may be necessary for Pontiac to attract more than the young professionals and empty
nesters that other successful downtowns have attracted in the recent past. Young
professionals and empty nest households have been the primary market for downtown housing
during recent years. Over the past two decades, the baby-boom generation made the young
professionals a growing market. That will not be so in the immediate future. Therefore, housing in
downtown Pontiac may have to appeal to a broader range of occupants, including families with
children. If so, it will be particularly important that Pontiac's downtown housing have secure,
private outdoor areas for individual residential units and/or secure common outdoor areas which are
available only to residents of the development.

Some, but not all, of the assets which other downtoW(l-S have used to attract quality housing
are available to Pontiac. A growing interest in historic architecture and the rich visual quality of
the urban environment has attracted people to downtown housing in recent decades. Pontiac has
this potential, but much of it has been lost in the past and what remains requires effort to preserve.
The increasing white collar workforce in other downtowns has made them attractive as residential
locations for those who seek the convenience of1iving near work. Pontiac has a large white collar
workforce at the Phoenix Center. A concentration of cultural and entertainment activities has
attracted residents to many downtowns. Pontiac has not had much of this asset in the past; the
renovation of the Strand Theater offers the potential for augmenting the entertainment activities
scheduled for the Phoenix Center plaza. Some downtowns have major natural amenities which have
helped attract downtown housing; the Detroit River has played this role for the City of Detroit.
Pontiac has no natural asset of this dramatic magnitude.

In Pontiac, as in most cities which have attracted quality downtown housing, it is

Page 13.34

....-.-.,,.--

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

II
II
II
II

�necessary to overcome substantial obstacles to such housing. These obstacles include the
difficulty of assembling land, the comparative high cost of land, the grec;1.ter risk of serving a
relatively narrow and specialized market, and impediment of having to displace low income
households. Pontiac will face these same problems, and overcome them.
In addition to housing in the downtown, desirable residential neighborhoods should be
connected to downtown. This means there should be no slums in or around Pontiac's downtown.
Also, the isolating effect of Wide Track Drive should be minimized to the extent possible. Actions
which would further increase the downtown's isolation should be avoided unless they provide other
very strong benefits for downtown.
Culture, Entertainment and Special Event Principles:
Cultural, entertainment and recreation events and activities must occur frequently to
bring non-residents downtown and to make downtown more attractive to potential
residents. At least some of the following periodic and ongoing activities should be secured for
downtown Pontiac:
public concerts,
art shows,
a farmer's market,
heritage festivals,
marathons and health runs,
a regional theater company, and
a regional symphony.

A unique special event that gives a distinctive identity is priceless; an "Automobile Parade
of Progress" could be such an event for downtown Pontiac. Such a parade could begin with the
earliest motor vehicle available, or even with a horse and buggy, and end with a General Motors
experimental solar car. A liberal sprinkling of historic Pontiac should adorn the parade in between.
The parade could be capped by a laser light show playing offhist-0ric architecture, particularly the
Pontiac State Bank Building.

ARCHITECTURAL PRINCIPLES for DOWNTOWN PONTIAC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
The buildings that create downtown street space must share a common relationship to the street and
to one another in order for downtown to have visual coherence. New architecture must respect
existing architecture by repeating common characteristics in building placement, orientation, and
design that contribute to downtown's image and sense of pedestrian orientation.

Overall Physical Order Principle:
A sense of overall order should be fostered by aligning structures in accordance with the
grid pattern established by Huron and Saginaw. Buildings should be rectangular and oriented
according to the basic downtown grid. Grid alignment is particularly important for buildings which
can be perceived in relation to a large segment of downtown. This includes most, if not all buildings
which can be seen from vantage points along Wide Track or along major downtown approach streets.
At the north end of downtown, first and second level facades which front on Oakland and Perry

Page 13.35

�might follow the diagonals created by these streets. Higher floors which can be seen from East or
West Wide Track could follow the basic Huron-Saginaw grid. Curved facades and diagonal
orientations unrelated to the street grid should not be permitted. An example of what not to do is
shown in Figure 13.16.

Street Space Continuity Principle:
A continuous developed edge is needed along important streets in order to create a
coherent, unified sense of place. Buildings form the walls that give clear spatial definition to the
street space. Infill development that repairs gaps in the urban fabric is crucial, especially on major
pedestrian and arterial streets. Consistent building setbacks and orientation to the street are also
essential.
Buildings should bring themselves and their activities right up to the street. Setbacks
should be controlled to bring the activity within a building to the edge of the pedestrian zone.
Lower-story facades should also be designed to share that activity with the street through the use of
large window areas. It is not necessary to control the detailed design of new or renovated buildings
in order to achieve a coherent, orderly, and satisfying pattern of urban development. However, it is
necessary to coordinate basic decisions on setbacks, heights, cornice lines, overall facade
organization, materials, ground-level programming, and storefront design.
Architectural continuity should be fostered through similarities in building height, scale,
massing, overall organization of the facade, and the use of materials, colors, and roof
shapes. The repetition of design themes helps build a recognizable sense of place for downtown.
The need for continuity does not mean all variety is undesirable. It is particularly important to
emphasize the characteristics that make downtown's existing architecture special and to develop a
local or regional vocabulary of architectural forms and materials rather than allowing anonymous,
anyplace architecture to weaken the city's special identity.
Architectural continuity should be fostered by the repetition of distinctive building
materials. Brick and stone predominate in Pontiac's downtown where they are found on many
historic facades as well as other buildings. Repetition of these materials in new structures will
enhance the visual cohesiveness of the downtown.
Architectural continuity should be fostered by the hpetition of distinctive roof forms.
Many historic cities, including London and Venice are famous examples of the effectiveness of roof
forms in establishing a distinctive design character. Public realm construction opportunities provide
opportunities to utilize this concept and sometimes without much expense. For example, the steeply
pitched roof of the Old Central Elementary School on Pike at Wide Track is a distinctive feature of
the Pontiac skyline which could be repeated elsewhere, possibly on the penthouse of the Public
Library. Executed in a post-modernist style, such an addition could utilize materials in keeping with
the original structure and reflect the historic roof line in pitch only.

I
I
I

•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•Ill

Traditional and Historic Architecture Principles and Guidelines:
Wherever possible, examples of downtown's traditional commercial, civic, and residential
architecture should be preserved, renovated, and, where appropriate, adaptively reused.
The human scale, rich materials, and architectural detailing of downtown's older buildings add

Page 13.36

Ill

�interest, identity, and amenity to the environment. New development should be designed to
complement the existing architecture and reinforce its features. The successful Strand Theater
renovation in Pontiac is a perfect example of this principal at work. Such renovations create a
positive climate for reinvestment and revitalization by strengthening downtown's market appeal.
Renovation will also help overcome the image of neglect and decline created by deteriorated
buildings, vacant or poorly modernized storefronts, and unattractive signs. The renovation of a
highly visible older building can serve as an important symbol of revitalization momentum, creating
an image of change and renewal, even if the direct contribution to the downtown tax and
employment base is minor.

Existing buildings with historic value should be protected by special regulatory
approaches, if necessary; such approaches can include downzoning, historic designation
and transfer of development rights. These approaches have been effective in other cities. They
operate as follows:
Downzoning is employed to discourage demolition of historic structures in favor of new highrise construction. In Pontiac, there are already more than enough downtown sites to
accommodate high-rise development. Downzoning of low-rise historic properties will help
disabuse owners of the expectation that the future holds some potential for big
redevelopment returns. Such imagined returns from future high-rise development can
discourage investment in the improvement and upkeep of existing buildings.
Historic landmark and district designation will temper redevelopment expectations. It can
also help ensure the coordination of changes to a building's architecture.
Transfer of development rights can encourage preservation of historic buildings in areas
zoned for higher-density development.

Traditional and Historic Renovation Guidelines:
Guidelines for exterior renovation are needed to coordinate individual restoration efforts.
Pontiac has made a major contribution to this effort with the 1990 Pontiac Facade Study, prepared
by Kirk &amp; Koskela. These renovation guidelines are an important educational tool for promoting
private reinvestment interest.
Renovations of commercial buildings should follow basic principles of good aesthetic and functional
design. The basic principles include:
strengthen the design unity of individual facades;
create storefronts with interest and activity; and
ensure compatibility in design, materials, and colors so that adjacent buildings appear to be
a single unit or at least a coordinated group of related parts.
The starting point in creating a unified blockface and in organizing the diversity of architectural
styles and details on a given street is an understanding of the building facade's design framework.
The framework is composed of two major elements: the upper facade and the storefront. These
components are discussed in the policies below.

Page 13.37

�The design, materials, and condition of a building's upper facade are the first
consideration in defining the architectural style of the building-rind in relating the
building to neighboring buildings in the blockface. The upper facade consists of the cornice
and fascia that cap the building front, the building's upper stories , the windows that give
articulation and interest to the upper architecture, and the piers that extend to groW1d level and
vi sually support the facade and frame the storefront. The massive, solid architecture of the upper
facade gives the building its feeling of substance and expresses its architectural quality and
character.
The cornice or fascia are necessary to create a strong roof line and give a finished
appearance to the building facade. Where they have been removed, these elements should be
restored to reemphasize the original design. The new cornice or fascia should be designed in
proportion to the overall mass of the building.
If original wall materials are present, they should be maintained. Original wall materials
should be cleaned and repaired. All exposed mechanical equipment, W1used electrical apparatus,
and sign supports should be removed.

Applied surface materials which is not part of the original design should be removed and
the building's original wall surface and detailing restored wherever possible. Nonoriginal
materials violate the integrity of the original architecture and weaken the essential balance between
the two principal facade components. It is particularly important to remove storefront surface
materials that extend onto the piers and walls of the upper facade. Metal paneling, tile, and stucco
are typical nonoriginal materials in downtown Pontiac. Where these or other new materials
sometimes must be applied to surfaces that cannot be restored or to buildings that are
architecturally W1distinguished; if so, they should be selected to coordinate with neighboring
structures and to complement the design of the storefront.
Original upper-story windows should be restored to create a sense of scale and to add
articulation and visual interest. Restoration and reglazing of the original upper-story windows
will dramatically reestablish the architectural integrity of many commercial buildings. The
proportions of windows in new buildings should replicate the rhythm of the window pattern found in
adjacent buildings.
Piers frame the storefront and visually anchor the \i.pper facade; they must be clearly
articulated in order to create a unified architectural framework that organizes the street's
visual diversity. Where the piers have been eliminated or reduced in size, the architectural
definition of the facade will be weak and the upper architecture inadequately balanced. The piers'
width and spacing should give support to the facade. Piers that segment the storefront are
recommended for wide buildings to improve balance. To emphasize the piers' integral role in
defining the architectural character of the upper facade , they should have the same surface material.

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
II

The street-level storefront is the area in which the individuality and identity of that
business can best be expressed. The storefront is defined by the upper facade's piers and the sign
frieze that separates the storefront's display windows and entrance from the upper architecture.
The storefront provides visual and physical access to the business located within. The storefront is
the focus of the facade, providing the visual interest and sense of activity that make the street
interesting and inviting. The storefront acts as a unifying element within the blockface by providing

Page 13.38

I

�strong horizontal lines and surfaces including continuous display windows, a consistent sign frieze.
and colorful awnings that link buildings together.
·

Renovation of' the lower facade should emphasize the open character of' the storefront and
its contribution to the street by maximizing the amount of window exposure provided in the
area framed by the sign frieze and the piers of the upper facade. The storefront should be eye
catching. It should read as an open area that contrasts with the solid mass of the upper facade. A
continuous band of storefront display windows at street level is necessary to make a lively street and
to unify the blockface. Display windows should never be filled or covered. Those that have been
altered should be restored to their original dimensions.
Extra design care and expense should be given to storefront entrances. The entrance should
be the focal point of the storefront. On more traditional buildings, recessed entrances are often used
to give greater definition to the storefront and provide some overhead protection. Where entrances
are flush with the display windows, awnings can be used to create the same effect. Entrance doors
should include glass panels to maximize the visibility of the building interior. The style of the door
and its hardware should be compatible with the design character of a good quality commercial
storefront; the use of stock residential doors bespeaks lack of substance. Where entrances to upper
stories are located adjacent to the storefront, they should blend into the framing architecture so that
they read as secondary elements.
Awnings can be an inexpensive, but highly effective tool for improving many retail facades.
They allow the introduction of color, variety, and interest without violating architectural integrity.
Awnings add to the comfort of pedestrians by providing overhead protection from sun and rain. They
should be used to focus attention on the storefront and create a strong horizontal element repeated
along the blockface. Awnings should be attached directly to the building without requiring
supporting columns or poles on the sidewalk.

Highly visible side and rear building elevations should be improved to present a more
attractive and organized appearance. Many side and rear elevations in downtown Pontiac are
highly visible and therefore have a significant impact on downtown's appearance. Unfinished side
elevations should be upgraded by removing or screening mechanical equipment. Front facade
materials and/or color should be extended to the side elevation. Where windows cannot be
introduced, painted large graphics applied to unbroken wall surfaces can add interest. Graphics are
usually most effective when contained within an area of neutral color.
Side elevations of corner buildings should be renovated according to the same guidelines
applicable to the storefront and upper portion of the main facade. Comer buildings set the
tone for an entire block. Therefore, it is particularly desirable that the design treatment of the
renovated storefront tum the corner and maintain streetscape continuity.
Rear elevations which provide access to buildings should be designed to create an inviting
appearance and an identity related to the front facade. This is particularly important where
parking is located behind buildings. At a minimum, all wall surfaces should be clean and in good
repair. Trash containers and service and storage areas should be well screened and carefully
maintained. Blocked-up windows should be reopened. An attractive entrance door, business sign,

Page 13.39

�and lighting should be added to give customer appeal. Awnings, display windows, and landscaping
are all desirable and sometimes necessary.

Infill Principles and Guidelines:
Infill development should be a -high development priority. Infill development repairs and
strengthens the urban fabric by eliminating gaps created by vacant lots and surface parking. The
pedestrian spine, primary connectors and image arterials are the priority locations for infill
development.

Infill Development Guidelines:
Infill buildings must be designed to reinforce the best characteristics of the existing
architecture. This type of "contextual design" is not a question of applying a period architectural
style to a new building. Instead, is necessary to translate the fundamental design characteristics of
existing development into a compatible contemporary idiom. In the era when most of Pontiac's
historic downtown buildings were built, basic building scale, forms, orientation, and materials were
relatively consistent. Variety and contrast were provided primarily by differences in detail and
ornamentation at a relatively minor scale. As a result, overall consistency and continuity were easy
to achieve. Today, this kind of consistency is more difficult to achieve. Technological innovations
and modern architecture allowed and encouraged a greater range of choice in building form, scale,
materials, and character; consequently, the potential for contrast is much greater. In trying to
create a distinctive identity for a particular project, newer urban architecture has tended to ignore
consistency in favor of strong contrasts. The Phoenix Center and the District Court Building are
examples of this. This extreme variety creates disorder and a lack of harmony in the urban
environment. A blend of old and new buildings can add variety, interest, and depth to downtown's
visual character. Similarly, strong contrasts in building design can be exciting and dramatic when
they create meaningful focal points and landmarks. But to be effective, the contrasting structure
must be set within a relatively quiet context of similar buildings. It is also important to note that
the tolerance for contrast decreases with city size. If infill buildings are to be compatible with
existing development, they must reinforce the elements that create design linkages. Each block and
each street will have its own vocabulary, but the guidelines set forth below provide general rules.
New development should replicate the setbacks of existing buildings to create a
consistently developed edge, reinforce downtown's urban development pattern, and
enhance pedestrian orientation. In downtown Pontiac's historic core, existing setbacks usually
coincide with the right-of-way line, making it possible fo~ active ground-level uses to open onto the
pedestrian zone.
Sideyard setbacks should echo the rhythm of spacing between existing buildings. In
Pontiac's historic core, sideyard setbacks should be eliminated except, perhaps, where through-block
pedestrian walkways are provided.
Height and massing of buildings should be compatible with existing development.
Transitions in height should be provided between existing low-rise development and taller new
structures. The building mass should be broken into increments that correspond to the scale and
massing of existing buildings through the use of piers, setbacks and variable roof heights.

Page 13.40

•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

�,

The location and articulation of entrances should replicate those of existing buildings.
The maj or building facade and entrance should be oriented to important street frontages and/or
primary pedestrian routes.
The street facades of new infill development should be organized into the same two major
components which typify historic buildings, the ground-level storefront and the upper
architecture, with strong horizontal elements separating the two. Especially on pedestrian
streets, where a sense of human scale and amenity are essential, the ground level storefronts should
provide substantial window areas to share the building's interior activities with the treet.
Major downtown development projects must be incorporated into the existing design
context of smaller-scale buildings. On a street or in a district where a positive and consistent
architectural character exists, the appropriate degree of compatibility is greater than that required
when the existing architecture is mediocre or worse. In the latter case, it is possible to allow the first
new project to establish the baseline for building a new context. Alternatively, contextual references
can be created, using the predominant scale and setbacks of existing development as a foundation
with illustrated guidelines establishing design objectives. Where the existing standard of design is
poor, the repetition of negative design elements and characteristics is undesirable. In new largerscale developments, unarticulated forms and masses should be avoided. Instead, the building should
be broken into smaller units that complement the existing urban fabric and provide transitions in
height and scale. Multiblock megastructures that erase downtown's street grid create negative
impacts by weakening the basic urban block structure and interrupting pedestrian movement. The
Phoenix Center is as clear a demonstration of this principle as can be found in any city.
In determining the height and intensity of major downtown structures, priority should be
given to spreading market potential so that development is spread over more of the
downtown.
To maintain a sense of human scale in the street space, the upward thrust of high-rise
facades should normally be moderated by creating a strong horizontal element that
establishes a "ceiling" for the street. The location of this lintel or setback, which defines the
effective height of the facade as perceived at street level, should be coordinated with the height of
cornice lines or lintels of existing buildings. To create a sense of human scale at street level and
relate a high-rise building more positively to the pedestrian, the use of materials and forms that
provide a scale of reference and a sense of three-dimensional articulation at ground level is desirable.
The use of reflective glass at ground level should be avoided so that the building base will meet the
ground in a manner that humanizes the street environment.

Sign Principles:
Signs have a stronger impact on the quality and appearance of individual buildings and
the total streetscape than do any other design element of commercial architecture.
Although signs can be designed and located to complement building architecture, they are often a
major contributor to visual chaos; this is particularly so in Pontiac. The sign's primary functions are
to identify a business, to contribute to its image, and to indicate the goods and services it offers. To
achieve these purposes successfully, a sign must be eye-catching without offending. It must make its
point without too many details or words ; it must not be so abstract that its message is ambiguous.
Each sign should complement the architecture of the building on which it is located and serve as a
unifying element in the blockface. Graphic simplicity and compatibility with the building

Page 13.41

�architecture are the basic principles of designing an effective and attractive system of signage. The
sign's components-size, location. materials, color lettering, and illumination--can be used to create
a positive identity for individual businesses and a unified image for downtown.

The size of each sign should be in proportion to the storefront and the building facade as a
whole. Signs should never be allowed to obscure or overwhelm the basic architectural character of
the building. A ratio of one square foot of sign area for each linear foot of building frontage is a good
rule of thumb in determining appropriate sign sizes. However, a sign should not be too big to fit into
a sign frieze above the storefront or another area of the facade in such a way that it does not cross
over or cover architectural details .
On traditional multistory commercial buildings, signs fit most naturally on the lintel or
sign frieze that separates the ground-level storefront from the upper facade. In this location,
the sign serves as a boundary between the two major facade components and helps strengthen their
definition. Wherever possible, signs within a blockface should be located at approximately the same
height to help unify all the buildings.
Sign materials and color should be compatible with the building's overall architectural
character and should help establish a quality image for downtown. Many materials are
appropriate, including wood, metal, plastic, neon, and canvas. Materials that convey a low quality
image, such as plastic panel signs, should be avoided. Bright colors are entirely appropriate for
signs, but the use of too many colors should be avoided.
The words, emblems and pictures used in any one sign should be limited to reduce visual
clutter. A good rule of thumb is that signs should have no more than ten items of information, an
item of information being defined as a syllable, a trademark, a logo or a picture. Usually these will
be taken up with the name of the business and other pertinent information related to its operation,
although it is not necessary to so specify in sign regulations so long as the total items of information
are restricted. Simplicity is the key to legibility and elegance. Bold simple lettering styles and the
use of recognized symbols are most effective.

Flashing and moving signs are inappropriate. Some parts of some downtowns can
accommodate such ruddy signs. Times Square in Manhattan is a good example where flashing and
moving signs are appropriate. Downtown Pontiac needs more sedate and dignified signs. Backlit or
indirectly lit signs should be required.
\

Public signs have a strong impact on the overall design quality of a downtown. Public signs
include signs which identify public streets; signs which identify public buildings, parking areas and
other facilities; and signs which direct traffic. Traffic signals themselves are a special kind of public
sign. Public signs in a downtown should do two things: 1) they should provide better than adequate
information to help motorists and pedestrians find their way around; and 2) they should contribute
to the continuity and clarity of the physical image of downtown. In order to contribute to continuity
and clarity, sign structures should be simple and clean and they should be coordinated with each
other and with the design of other downtown amenities, including street lighting and street
furniture.

Page 13.42

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
■

II

•

II
II
II
II

�Figure 13.19
DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL PRINCIPLES

Architectural solidity must be established
by the upper facade and the piers which
support it.

Visual richness and variety must be
achieved in the storefront. Signs, awnings
and other appurtenances could be
elements of the storefront.

lJi@

[I
'

'

cl
'
'

[I~

The upper facade and the piers which
support it should be characterized by:
1.

a strong cornice which visually
caps the structure;

2.

windows which provide a sense of
use and activity;

3.

a solid wall area; and

4.

ample piers for support.

Page 13.43

�■
■
■
■
■
■
■

Figure 13.20
DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL PRINCIPLES

Piers should be of sufficient frequency and thickness to visually support the upper facade.

SIGN FRIEZE
r-----------..

S

G N

I
I
I
I
I

Signs which are not part of the storefront should be located: 1) a sign frieze which is a distinct and
integral component of the upper facade architecture, or 2) placed as individual letters on the upper
facade. Signs should not cross architectural components such as cornices, sills and piers.

Page 13.44

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I

�Figure 13.21
DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL PRINCIPLES

11

SIGN

11111
1111111

L------

Visual compatibility must be established through the use of compatible and coordinated materials.
Buildings must be clearly divided into two parts: 1) the upper facade and 2) the storefront. The
upper facade must be a simple and clearly articulated architectural entity; it must not have its form
and materials hidden or partially hidden by signs or applied "decorative" elements. Variety and
interest must be achieved in the storefront which must be clearly confined by the upper facade and
the piers which support it.

Page 13.45

�DOWNTOWN PHYSICAL ANALYSIS: LIABILITIES

A lot of Pontiac's downtown signage is not very artistic and some ofit is downright ugly.
Inartistic signs pay no respect to the architectural elements of the building on which they are placed.
Some are out of proportion with the facia on which they hang. Some have lettering which is done in
a crude style that lacks finesse. Such crudeness makes an unintended statement that the facility
identified is more important than the downtown of which it is a part. The sign on the west facade of
the Oakland Press building makes a similar statement. An excessively bold "now leasing" sign can
create the appearance of desperation. A subtler "now leasing" sign can convey the impression of
success. Some sites near downtown have grossly excessive signage, including ropes with banners.
When excessive signage is combined with other site clutter like curb-side merchandise displays and
cluttered parking lots, the visual impression is even worse. Billboards do not belong downtown or
even visible from Wide Track Drive. Public signage in downtown Pontiac is not the strong design
and functional asset that it could be. Public signs include signs which identify public streets; signs
which identify public buildings, parking areas and other facilities; and signs which direct traffic.
Traffic signals themselves are a special kind of public sign.
Downtown Pontiac is filled with many "make-shift" structures which downgrade the
overall aesthetic appeal of the area. Some of these structures are small buildings . Others are
additions or modifications of existing buildings. A small building example can be seen on the east
side of Mill Street near Lawrence. It is a metal shed-type structure. More distressing is the metal
parapet on the west facade of the Oakland Press Building which spoils the architectural interface
between building and sky, an interface that was made elegant by the original brick parapet. The
handsomeness of the original building can be seen on the east facade.

Unattractive fenestration infill is a serious aesthetic problem downtown, just as it is in the
city's commercial strips. Many buildings have had their front windows replaced with a material
that provides more security. Typically, infill material is completely different from the basic facade
material of the building. Rough sawed wood siding or raw concrete block on a sophisticated historic
brick facade are particularly grating. This thoughtless approach bespeaks slum. It says that the
owner is more concerned about the security of his building than he is about his responsibility to
community aesthetic values. It is possible to meet both security and aesthetic needs, but it usually
costs a little more to do so or at least requires more thought.
There is too much vacant and underutilized land downtown for the market to absorb in a
short period of time. Much of the underutilized land contains deteriorating buildings that are
detrimental to the marketability of desirable buildings.\ Some underutilized parking lots are almost
as degrading to downtown as are deteriorating buildings. Many vacant lots are unkempt. It is
necessary to find some way to turn this land, which will remain idle for some time to come, into an
asset that will help market downtown. A downtown greenfields concept is one possible solution.
Such a greenfields concept envisions attractive but simply landscaped open space areas that use
gravel, grass and trees to create sophisticated urban parks. One city termed such a park "a little
park for a little while." The relatively recent tree planting effort on Wide Track Drive West south of
Whittemore shows that even modest efforts help. The new trees help establish a sense of order by
establishing a wall of vegetation parallel to the street line.
Downtown Pontiac is replete with unsightly, deteriorated buildings and poorly kept yards.
Unsightly buildings include buildings that have been boarded-up, buildings that have ugly signs,
buildings that have side and rear facades that are cluttered with fire escapes and mechanical

Page 13.46

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

�,

p
p

equipment, and buildings that have side and rear facades that are not finished to acceptable "front"
facade standards. Unsightly yards include those that have trash and equipment stored in full public
view, and that provide for on-site parking on unpaved and unstriped surfaces. Many unsightly
buildings and yards are located along Wide Track Drive where they play a very prominent role in the
visual environment. They mock the idea that downtown Pontiac could be a vibrant center of
economic life. They should be relocated to a more appropriate area or modified so that they do not
have a negative impact.

Deteriorated residential areas contribute to the image of downtown blight. Like downtown's
unsightly commercial and industrial buildings, deteriorated residential areas are located along Wide
Track Drive and hence play a very prominent role in the visual environment. Poor building
maintenance is matched with unkempt yards, including the haphazard deposit of wisightly vehicles
and domestic junk.

DOWNTOWN PHYSICAL ANALYSIS: ASSETS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Downtown Pontiac has established a record that proves people will come if something
special is offered. Downtown Pontiac came alive when the Silverdome hosted the National
Football League's Super Bowl. People from all over the region and from all over the country came to
Pontiac, spent money and had a very good time. The Super Bowl was an unusual event. However,
downtown Pontiac proves it can attract people from all over Oakland County nearly every day of the
year. The Pike Street restaurant, which has a strong reputation as a gourmet restaurant, attracts
lunch and dinner time patrons from all over Oakland County and from outside of Oakland Cowity.

M-59 brings heavy regional traffic through downtown Pontiac without destroying the
potential for continuity in the retail and pedestrian environment. A 1988 study by the
Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) indicated that average daily traffic volumes were
approximately in the 28,000 to 30,000 range. The MDOT study expected volumes to increase to the
40,000 to 50,000 range once the Oakland Technology Center reaches full employment. This traffic
will necessitate road improvements to avoid grid lock at peak hours. However, it also brings a
potential market parading through downtown every working day.
The Phoenix Center is a major city-wide asset, but not yet a particularly strong asset for
downtown. In terms of its benefit to the entire City of Pontiac, the Phoenix Center is a great
success. It contains the largest, newest office space in the city. It provides more than ample
parking. Most of GM's 2,500 downtown employees work there. In terms of its benefit to downtown
Pontiac, the Phoenix Center is still just an opportunity. This is because the space separating the
Phoenix Center from the rest of downtown is so great, and so inhospitable. Studies of shopping
habits of downtown workers show that few will travel more than nine minutes (usually about 1,000
feet) to get to even the most intensive shopping destinations. Most Phoenix Center workers would
have to travel nine minutes before they reach Pike Street. There is very little beyond Pike Street to
attract them at the present time. The distance between the Phoenix Center and Pike Street is
inhospitable because it lacks climate control and because it is unattractive. There is virtually
nothing to attract office-worker spending power. Fear of crime exacerbates the problem.

The southwest corner of Huron and Saginaw is a major development opportunity for
downtown. This "100 percent corner" now consists of a parking lot. If absolutely necessary, a few
adjacent buildings on Saginaw Street could be razed to enlarge the site. Such a site could

Page 13.47

�accommodate a building comparable in size to the Phoenix Center. The uncertain future of M-59 is
an impediment to development of the Saginaw-Huron site.

The alley which runs parallel to and between Saginaw and Wayne is another major
development opportunity. If a substantial mixed-use structure were developed at Saginaw and
Huron, it could function as an anchor for a pedestrian mall in the alley west of Saginaw between
Huron and Pike. A second mixed-use anchor could be developed on the urban renewal land between
Pike Street and the Phoenix Center. This second anchor could be linked to the Phoenix Center. The
Pedestrian Mall could provide all-weather access to restaurant, night club, retail and office uses.
Both anchors could accommodate housing retail, office, hotel even residential uses located along the
mall and in the anchors.
A very dramatic cluster of Pontiac's major downtown buildings have landmark and/or
historic significance; these help establish a unique sense of place. Buildings in this cluster
give unique identity to the area and serve as landmarks that can be seen from a distance along the
major approaches to downtown. Key buildings in the downtown cluster are listed below:
Pontiac State Bank Building (location 1 in Figure 13.22);
Community National Bank Building (location 2);
Riker Building (location 3);
Michigan Bell radio tower (location 4); and
Masonic Temple (location 5).
These buildings are important architectural and urban design assets. The roofline of the Pontiac
State Bank Building is one of the most elaborate and elegant in the country. It is an architectural
asset worthy of the highest appreciation. The Masonic Temple roofline is also distinctive.

The Phoenix Center is another dramatic cluster of buildings which have landmark
significance; these too help establish a unique sense of place. These important urban design
assets are:
Phoenix Center towers (locations 6 &amp; 7 in Figure 13.22);
Pontiac Place Senior Citizen High-rise (location 8); and
Pontiac Place Office Building (location 9).

Other small, but very worthy historic landmarks re\nforce downtown's unique sense of
place. These historic buildings include:
St. Vincent DePaul Church (location 10 in Figure 13.22);
Board of Education Building (location 11);
City Hall (location 12);
Old Central Elementary School (location 13);
First Congregational Church (location 14);
Furlong Building (location 15);
First Baptist Church (Salvation Army) (location 16);
First Presbyterian Church (location 17);
Daily (Oakland) Press (location 18); and
First United Methodist Church (location 19).

Page 13.48

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

�These buildings, because of their rich architecture and prominent locations, are major landmarks in
downtown. They provide downtown with visual interest and a sense of .place.

Other numerous historic buildings further reinforce downtown's unique sense of place.
These buildings have, for the most part, less historic importance than the major historic structures
of the core group. However, as a group, the more modest buildings contribute significantly to the
city's distinctive downtown character. The cumulative effect of these buildings is to provide the city
with a rich architectural spirit.
Rolling topography, one of Pontiac's greatest assets, is particularly important to the
downtown's unique sense of place. High points in the downtown topography provide an
opportunity to see landmarks and distinctive districts from a distance. Important buildings are
highlighted and viewers can take in a sense of the whole in a way that would not otherwise be
possible. City planners throughout history have used topographic high points as sites for important
buildings. Topography is one of the principal assets that makes the City of Rome so memorable.
Pontiac streets, like Roman streets, do not try to minimize the sense of changing contours. Instead
they heighten dramatic impact by cutting right across contour lines. The value of placing important
buildings at topographic high points was understood by Pontiac's early planners, or else they made
some very lucky site location decisions. Old Central Elementary School is a case in point. Its highground location has been made all the more dramatic by the more modern Wide Track Drive.
Topography works against the image of downtown where it affords an opportunity to view low lying,
unattractive areas from thoroughfares elevated by natural contours. For example, Wide Track Drive
West just west of Oakland Avenue is on high ground. As the roadway curves to the south toward
Huron, its elevation offers a very unattractive view of the northwest side of downtown.
Distant views of distinctive landmarks enhance the visual richness of downtown Pontiac.
These views are produced by the interaction of its topography and historic architecture. One such
landmark which can be seen from many different locations is St. Vincent DePaul's steeple. Provided
that the steeple itself can be preserved, it will be well worthwhile to protect views of it from different
downtown vantage points. For example, traffic entering downtown on University stops at Perry and
Huron before turning right and heading west. St. Vincent DePaul's steeple can be seen from the
right-hand lane (but not from the left because it is blocked by the south stairwell of the municipal
parking structure). It provides a beautiful orientation point in the day and would be very dramatic
at night if lit. This view can be preserved by controlling the height and placement of buildings on
Perry and on the urban renewal site on Water Street and the end of Perry. Those parts of future
buildings which are in line with St. Vincent DePaul's should not exceed the height of the historic
three-story Waldron Building (Competitive Telephone Systems).

Page 13.49

�•
•
•
•
•
•

Figure 13.22
DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL LAN DMARKS

Iii
~z

!'o~-

~

\

i

■

~~

o'"D@
~
WATE

~

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
Page 13.50

I

�The Silverdome is sited where it is visible from West Huron as it enters and passes through
downtown from the west. This may have been lucky happenstance, but the results are no less
memorable. Contours reach a high point at the point of Pontiac Central High School (west of State
Street ). From this high point, motorists approaching can look straight across the downtown to the
Silverdome. Thus the downtown is visually linked with one of the most important symbols of the
city's economic life and regional identity. As M-59 continues east, the topography dips down at Wide
Track Drive West and raises up again to reach another crest at Saginaw. From this point, the
Silverdome is still in view, but not as dramatically as from the higher ground at Pontiac Central
High School.
Potential revenue source for downtown redevelopment could be between $21,000,000 and
$37,000,000, but utilization of theses sources would require bonding and risk. A preliminary
analyses completed in 1990 by Lewis Wilking, a consultant to the Pontiac Growth Group, indicates
that a downtown upgrade could be funded from the following sources:
$30,000,000 from bonding against Tax Increment Financing Area
(TIFA) revenues for 7 years
3,000,000 from bonding against Downtown Development
(DDA) revenues for 7 years
4 300 000 from money now in the General Building Authority
(GBA) fund
$37,300,000 Total based on 7 year TIFA and DDA bonding
$27,000,000 Total based on 5 year TIFA and DDA bond
These figures have not been fully confirmed by a detailed financial audit. Furthermore, they are
subject to change over time as new assets and liabilities arise. However, the Wilking preliminary
figures do indicate the possibility of a substantial asset for downtown improvement.

The Pontiac Growth Group controls substantial downtown property which could be the
basis for revitalization. This property is concentrated in the blocks bounded by Lawrence, Perry,
Water, Saginaw, Pike and Wayne. Approximately 70,000 square feet or 28 percent of the site area of
these blocks is owned or otherwise controlled by the city.

REVIEW of PAST DOWNTOWN PLANNING
and DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

The "New Pontiac Plan" Concept of 1980 envisioned a radical remaking of downtown.
Prior to construction of the Phoenix Center, the city adopted a downtown plan concept that was
called the "New Pontiac Plan." This concept is incorporated in the Pontiac 2000 Plan published in
May of 1980. The New Pontiac Plan concept, which shows the influence of the famous French
architect Le Corbusier, called for the total remaking of the downtown in the image of a suburban
office plaza. The entire area within Wide Track Drive was to become what the Phoenix Center is, a
cluster of high-rise towers distributed about a pedestrian plaza elevated above the major streets. A
few of the more prominent existing buildings were to be retained, but as quasi-museum pieces
separated from the pedestrian plaza which would link all the new development together. There was

Page 13.51

�no attempt to preserve any continuity in the existing fabric of downtown. The street pattern was w
be virtually obliterated. Saginaw Street, which is probably older than the city itself, completely
disappeared. The Phoenix Center was a first phase realization of the New Pontiac Plan concept.
Whether or not the future will proceed as proposed in the past is a question that must be re-asked
and re-answered by each successive group of plan makers. The planning effort of which this
document is a part certainly ought to ask this question and arrive at an answer informed by the
knowledge of new developments and ideas that have occurred over the past decade.

The 1984 American City Corporation study of downtown Pontiac emphasized the need for a
major facelift as a condition for additional new development. The study, prepared for the
Pontiac Downtown Development Authority, observed that the recently completed Phoenix Center
and Pike Street Restaurant were very positive improvements. So was the then pending Eagle
Theater renovations. However, the report said:
In order for additional development to occur successfully, a major downtown facelift must be
completed.
The American City report further specified the following facelift efforts deemed most important:
1. Rigorous building code enforcement to bring all stores and offices up to current safety

standards;
2. Facade renovations with city financial help if need be and with state and/or other help if
possible;
3. Streetscape improvements, including replacing old curbs and sidewalks with wide,
attractive walkways, barrier-free curbs, planters, new lighting and other pedestrian
amenities; and
4. Circulation improvements, partially in the form of a pedestrian skyway system, to link the
Phoenix Center, senior citizen center, the Saginaw Street office and financial hub, the
municipal complex and the transportation center.
These facelift efforts were expected to be helpful, (and maybe necessary) to the effort to attract
developers to downtown.

The 1984 American City Corporation study of downtown Pontiac identified the need for
major activity generators. The American City Corporation also pointed out the importance of
public activity generators to any downtown. It noted tltat there were few such activity generators in
Pontiac and it suggested the following on-going or periodic activities:
Grand Prix auto racing,
public concerts,
an auto exchange,
art shows,
a farmer's market,
heritage festivals, and
marathons and health runs.

.

I
•

I

.

I

I

I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I

II

Page 13.52

------------

�American City also suggested that Pontiac seek the following institutions as permanent residents:
A regional theater company ,
Pontiac Theater IV,
North Star Productions,
Lakeland Players , and
the Pontiac-Oakland Symphony.

The 1984 American City Corporation study suggested that consideration be given to a
major, market-inducing development project for downtown Pontiac; but the study was not
enthusiastic about prospects for such a bold project. The American City Corporation study
noted that development "perspective runs the gamut from conservative to bold," but conservative
thought generally prevails. Notwithstanding, the study also enumerated a few outstanding
examples of the bold approach successfully implemented. These included:
Renaissance Center in Detroit,
Water Tower Place in Chicago,
Grand Avenue in Milwaukee, and
Harborplace in Baltimore.
All of these "bold" projects involved a major developer "inducing a market," i.e. creating a major
mixed-use project where goods and services are sold, and creating it in a location where there was no
measurable pre-existing demand for such a facility. The American City Corporation report
enumerated three factors that supported the prospect for the bold approach in Pontiac:
The land is controlled or controllable,
Oakland County has very high income levels, and
influential local business people are willing to help secure the right developer.
Despite the presence of three favorable conditions, the American City Corporation did not advise
Pontiac to make a major effort to secure such a bold-approach developer. Instead, it suggested that
Pontiac spend about six months and a limited amount of money to find the right bold-approach
developer willing to try his hand in Pontiac. The report suggested that a bold-approach project for
Pontiac could include the seven acre urban renewal site west of the Phoenix Center, the three acre
urban renewal site east of the center and the three blocks along Saginaw between Water and
Lawrence. Of course, the report noted that there could be no certainty that a developer could be
found.

Notwithstanding its statement that conservative thought tends to prevail in development
perspectives, the American City Corporation recommended an "ambitious" approach, by
which it meant something more than conservative but less than bold. This ambitious
approach was expected to require substantial funds and commitments from the public and private
sectors. In its initial phase, American City's ambitious approach had six parts: 1) an ice arena with
a practice rink open to the public; 2) two office buildings; 3) a regional theater and the Pontiac IV
Theater; 4) a food court; 5) retail goods and services; and 6) a hotel. The market study of these
proposals made a number of very optimistic assumptions. The success of each depended on the
presence of the others.

The Ice Arena: The arena was to include an Olympic-sized hockey rink with 6,000 to 8,000
seats. It would have served Compuware Hockey Club as well as the general public. At the
time of the study, Compuware had over 300 boys participating in one of the most successful
youth programs in the country. The arena would have been a unique attraction to bring

Page 13.53

�people to downtown Pontiac, people who would not otherwise come to Pontiac. A market
study by the accounting firm of Touche Ross confirmed the feasibility of the arena concept
with Compuware participation.

Two Office Buildings: The study found a suburban office market with two to five percent
vacancy rates and a Pontiac market with a nine percent overall vacancy rate and a 27
percent general or speculative rate. Sixty percent of the city's occupancy was single-user or
owner-occupied space, which is called "non-competitive" space. Notwithstanding, American
City projected a potential for developing one new 110,000 square foot office building
downtown. This was based on the assumption that Compuware would develop and occupy
60,000 square feet for its own needs and that it would develop another 50,000 square feet of
speculative space for its future needs. Development of a second office building would come at
some future time.
Regional Theater Company and Pontiac IV Theater: Based on an analysis completed by
Theater Projects Consultants, Incorporated, it was believed that a regional theater company
and an amateur theater company could be secured for downtown Pontiac, provided that
appropriate space was available. Renovation of the historic Strand Theater was seen as the
best way of securing the space.
Food Court : American Cities assessment of food court feasibility seems optimistic from the
perspective of 1990. American Cities expected the food court would generate over half its
income from trade area residents. To do this it would have to capture 0.003 percent of trade
area sales potential. This capture rate was deemed "... realistic in light of similar projects
developed by The Rouse Company, including Harborplace in Baltimore, Faneuil Hall in
Boston, and New York City's South Street Seaport." These are projects with vastly more
going for them than can be envisioned for downtown Pontiac. It is difficult to imagine how
Rouse Company experience with these projects could be transferred to Pontiac.
Furthermore, while these major city festival markets have been very successful, similar
Rouse Company projects in smaller cities (Toledo, Ohio, Richmond, Virginia and Flint,
Michigan, for example) have had significant difficulties. The American Cities report
expected ten percent of food court income to come from visitors to Silverdome conventions. It
expected 20 percent to come from arena patrons and five percent to come from theater
patrons.
Hotel: The American Cities study found insufficient demand for a full service hotel. It did
find potential for a small European style hotel offering good service and limited or no special
facilities. The only known facility of this type in Oakland County is now located in the City
of Birmingham.
The American City Corporation's "ambitious" approach required a $100,000,000 public/
private financial strategy; the public funding sources are not now available. According to a
Touche Ross financial strategy, $16,000,000 was needed from the public sector and $84,000,000 from
the private sector. Major public funding sources were anticipated to be: 1) a $16,790,000 Urban
Development Action Grant (UDAG), and 2) a $14,450,000 Economic Development Administration
(EDA) grant and/ or loan. These funding sources are not now available. The EDA grant and loan
program had been cut back drastically. The UDAG program had been completely terminated. The
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has been developing an
Enterprise Zone concept to facilitate urban revitalization. This program, if enacted, may be a tax
incentive program. If it is, projects may depend more on private than public initiative. Something
like the American Cities Ambitious Plan may not stimulate the necessary private initiative. Certain
public funding sources are still available for downtown. They include: 1) industrial revenue bonds,
2) excess Phoenix Center bond proceeds, and 3) Downtown Development Authority mortgage pool

Page 13.54

I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

•
•
•
•

�funding. Utilization of these sources was envisioned in the Touche Ross strategy, so they are not
alternatives to UDAG or EDA funds.

During the late 1980's, Pontiac nearly achieved a major single tenant office building. A
major chain retailer considered urban renewal land in downtown Pontiac as the site for its corporate
headquarters. Negotiations to secure this project were based on the expectation that UDAG funds
would be available to enhance its attractiveness. The project failed to reach fruition because of
unanticipated changes in the retailer's financial status.
Downtown hotel development potential was evaluated in 1988 without a strong positive
finding. The Laventhol &amp; Horwath study was somewhat ambiguous in its conclusions and made a
number of favorable assumptions in order to arrive at some positive findings. The study found area
growth and downtown accessibility to be positive factors. Extensive competition was seen to be a
major negative factor. The study saw competition coming from 11 existing facilities with 2,193
rooms, plus an additional 1,200 rooms under construction or in planning. It was projected that not
more than 1,000 of these additional rooms could be absorbed by 1993. Laventhol &amp; Horwath made
no recommendation to develop, but did indicate a projected cash flow before fixed charges based on
an $80 room rate and a 54 to 65 percent occupancy rate between 1991 and 1995. The study assumed
that there will be substantial upgrade in the quality of downtown Pontiac's physical environment.
Included in this improvement is an assumed "Marketplace of Nations" (MONAT), a 130,000 to
140,000 square foot urban entertainment complex with the following facilities:
Nightclubs (3)
Restaurants (5)
Specialty retail store
Small retail stores
Offices
Apartments
Atrium

19,000 sq.
25,000 sq.
14,000 sq.
28,000 sq.
31,700 sq.
13,000 sq.
9,500 sq.

ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.

MONAT was to be located on the block bounded by Pike, Saginaw, Lawrence and Wayne. The
Phoenix Development Company was to be the developer.

In the mid 1980's, the Pontiac Planning Division developed three important concepts for
upgrading pedestrian circulation in downtown. These concepts all recognize the need to
greatly enhance pedestrian circulation facilities. The most ambitious of three concepts incorporated
an elaborate system of pedestrian skyways, outdoor pedestrian malls and indoor pedestrian malls. A
less ambitious concept incorporated pedestrian skyways to integrate the Phoenix Center office
towers and the Pontiac Place senior citizen high-rise with future development on vacant urban
renewal land to the northwest and northeast of the Phoenix Center.

In the mid 1970's, the Pontiac Planning Division also developed important streetscape
concepts for downtown. These concepts called for the preservation of existing streetscapes
predominated by historic facades. The buildings so recognized include those in the blocks previously
identified as still having building and retail continuity.

Page 13.55

�For this Comprehensive Plan, ihe PHH Fantus Company identified six types of uses which
it thought downtown Pontiac had the greatest potential to capture. These targeted uses
include:
entertainment and restaurants,
smaller "back-office" and service firms ,
health care services and health care related businesses,
government offices,
service and specialty retail, and
apartments.

The PHH Fantus Company studied downtown Pontiac for this plan and recommended
improvements it felt necessary to overcome downtown's substantial problems. These
improvements are set forth in the growth enhancement policies. They relate to:
the need to correct the city's larger crime, education, and image problems;
the need to correct the downtown's specific crime problems with mowited officers and/or
other special patrols;
the need to improve access, particularly from Wide Track into attractive parking areas;
the need to improve the appearance of downtown in general ;
the need to improve the appearance of the downtown's excessive open space;
the need to provide renovated and new office space;
the need to attract each of the targeted uses, which can then serve to attract other uses;
the need to capture General Motor's and other significant employers' service and retail
needs;
the need to improve the connection between the Phoenix Center and the rest of the
downtown;
the need to maximize the image potential of downtown's historic character buildings; and
the need to have some demonstrated successes.

i
,.

I
,.

I

i
I

-I

-I
I
I

II
II
Page 13.56

- .........,,==~--

-

�Downtown Pontiac the night before the Super Bowl was played in the Silverdome

Page 13.57

�Chapter 14
FUTURE LAND USE MAP and MAP P O L I C I E S - - - - - - - - - - with Related Explanations

INTRODUCTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
This section is organized into policies which relate directly to the land use categories in the future
land use map. Also included are tables which indicate the total land area allocated to different land
use categories by this plan and by some previous plans.

FUTURE LAND USE MAP POLICIES _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
In Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Low Density Residential," residential uses
should be limited to residential uses with a maximum density of not more than five
dwelling units per acre; different zoning districts and planned development regulations
may be used to implement this density. This means minimum lot sizes of 8,700 square feet for
conventional single-family subdivisions. Cluster subdivisions and similar planned developments
which incorporate common open space for recreation and/or aesthetic purposes may have smaller lots
for each individual home, so long as the average site area for each unit is 8,700 square feet exclusive
of vehicular circulation rights-of-way. Single-family attached developments and other residential
forms with an average of 8,700 square feet per unit exclusive of vehicular circulation may also be
permitted. Different zoning districts and/or planned development provisions may be utilized to
regulate various different sites within the "Low Density Residential Area." Zoning may be used to
set aside a portion of the "Low Density Residential" area for densities lower than 8,700 square feet
per unit.
In Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Low-Medium Density Residential,"
residential uses should be limited to residential uses with a maximum density of not more
than seven dwelling units per acre; different zoning districts and planned development
regulations may be used to implement this density. This means minimum lot sizes of 6,200
square feet for conventional single-family subdivisions. At such densities, new single-family
detached development should occur in zero lot line and related configurations as shown in Figure
14.1. Developments which incorporate common open space for recreation and/or aesthetic purposes
may have smaller lots for each individual home, so long as the average site area for each unit is
6,200 square feet exclusive of vehicular circulation rights-of-way. Different zoning districts and/or
planned development provisions may be utilized to regulate various different sites within the "LowMedium Density Residential" areas. Zoning may be used to set aside a portion of the "Low-Medium
Density Residential" area for densities lower than 6,200 square feet per unit.

Page 14.1

�Figure 14.1
ZERO LOT LINE and RELATED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TYPES

1

4

2

3

5

1) Zero Lot-Line Lot; 2) "Z" Lot; 3) Angled "Z" Lot; 4) Wide-Shallow Lot; 5) Zipper Lot

\

■
■

•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
Page 14.2

�Convenience food stores may be allowed in certain Land Use Plan areas which are
designated "Low Density Residential" and "Low-Medium Density _Residential" where
necessary to serve the grocery shopping needs of people who do not have easy access to
automobiles for trips to a supermarlzet. In order to function as intended, i_e_ in order to serve
the grocery shopping needs of households with limited mobility, convenience food stores must be
within walking distance of the population they serve. Accordingly, some convenience food stores
necessarily must be located within residential rather than non-residential areas. Such stores should
be permitted by incorporation of a special convenience store commercial zoning district to be mapped
on sites where convenience stores are desired and appropriate_ Since this mapping would be done in
pursuit of this specific comprehensive plan policy, it would not constitute illegal spot, zoning.
Mapping should give preference to locations on arterial and collector streets. Other locations should
only be considered if there is no possibility to serve a particular area from a location on an arterial or
collector street_ Loitering, crime and other social problems sometimes which might be associated
with convenience stores should be taken into consideration when deciding on convenience store
locations_ These problems should also be addressed by appropriate zoning and licensing regulations.
Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Medium Density Residential" should be
limited to residential uses at a density of not more than 20 dwelling units per acre;
different zoning districts and planned development regulations may be used to implement
this density. This means a minimum lot area of 2,178 square feet per residential unit. Single
family attached townhouse type developments are possible, but somewhat cramped if developed at
the 20 unit per acre maximum density provided for by the Medium Density category. Garden
apartment developments are feasible at 20 units per acre. Higher rise apartments with substantial
open space are also possible. Different zoning districts and/or planned development provisions may
be utilized to regulate various different sites within the "Medium Density Residential" areas. Zoning
may be used to set aside a portion of the "Medium Density Residential" area for densities lower than
2,178 square feet per unit.
Land Use Plan areas which are designated "High Density Residential/Office/Retail may
contain high density residential uses in groupings with certain t:ypes of office and retail
commercial uses. Areas designated High Density Residential/Office/Retail are located at the
Clinton Valley site and in the downtown area. At the Clinton Valley site, it is envisioned that the
residential/office/retail mix will occur primarily in the historic buildings on the site. In the
downtown area it is envisioned that the residential/office/retail mix will occur within individual
buildings_ It is also envisioned that one or two of the various uses in the mix may predominate in
individual buildings, but that buildings with different dominant uses will be closely related to each
other by close physical proximity and pedestrian access ways. When high density residential, office
and retail uses are grouped together in mixed use developments, it is necessary that they be
mutually compatible. A very limited range of office uses and a very limited range of retail uses are
compatible with residential uses. However, such office and retail uses may be developed at
substantial intensities so long as a desirable design relationship is maintained between them and
related residential uses. The proper types and intensities of office and retail uses in mixed-use
developments should be set forth in zoning regulations applicable to the Clinton Valley site and the
downtown. Residential uses in mixed-use projects may be very high density. Specific densities may
be spelled out in zoning regulations designed specifically for Clinton Valley and other regulations
designed specifically for downtown.
Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Transitional Office/Medium Density
Residential/Parking" may contain medium-density residential uses, office uses and
parking along with single-family residential uses so long as the physical character of the
area in which they are located is preserved. The ''Transitional Office/Medium Density

Page 14.3

�ResidentiaVParking" land use category is intended as a vehicle for preserving the physical character
of the areas where it is mapped while at the same time allowing a certain degree of use flexibility.
The category is mapped along the south side of West Huron. Here it is intended to ensure
preservation of the form of large older homes which characterize this part of the city. Zoning
regulations applicable to this area should permit single-family homes . They should also permit twofamily or even three-family homes , provided that a high minimum dwelling unit size is established
for at least one of the units and an overall high minimum dwelling unit size is established for the
average of all units. This is to encourage owner occupancy and better maintenance. Zoning
regulations for the south side of West Huron could also permit office uses, but only those low
intensity office uses which generate minimum traffic and parking demands. Two-family and threefamily uses and office uses should be permitted only when adequate parking is provided. Parking
should be provided in the rear yard. Front yards should be landscaped and well maintained. The
structural character of existing older homes should be maintained, whether used for single-family or
other purposes. New buildings should be designed to have height, bulk and massing characteristics
which are the same as typical of older structures on the south side of West Huron. The ''Transitional
Office/Medium Density ResidentiaVParking" category is also mapped along Seneca between Perry
and University. Zoning regulations for this area should be structured much like those described for
the south side of West Huron, except that the requirements which apply to the massing of structures
should be tailored to any differences in structure sizes between the two areas. So should minimum
residential unit sizes. Special regulations may be needed governing the aesthetics of those rear
yards which face on Wide Track Drive. Finally, the ''Transitional Office/Medium Density
ResidentiaVParking" category is mapped in an area west of downtown between West Huron and
Orchard Lake Road. Parcels fronting on Williams, Clinton, Lawrence, Pike, Exchange and Front are
included in this area. Here the existing development pattern is considerably different from that on
West Huron and Seneca. However, the basic concept of maintaining the existing physical character
of the area while permitting some use flexibility is the same. Zoning regulations should include
strict building mass and site development controls which are specifically tailored to this area. A
"specific plan" may be the most appropriate way to achieve this. The "specific-plan" concept is
described in another policy of this chapter. Zoning regulations should also permit a mix of singlefamily, multiple-family and non-residential uses.

Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Office" should be limited to office and a very
narrow range of non-office uses which directly support office uses. The plan envisions certain
areas as being appropriate only for office use. Retail or other non-residential uses are deemed to be
undesirably intensive for these areas. The limited range of non-office uses which might be
appropriate include retail sales and service uses which cater to office uses, such as office supply
stores, photo-reproduction services and quick printing services. Restaurants which do not cater to
the motoring public might also be appropriate. Areas designated for office use are those where the
advantages of the office designation combined with th\ existing pattern of use make the concept
most obviously appropriate. The plan does not designate every area which might be appropriate only
for office uses and a limited range of non-office uses. The plan envisions that other such areas
should be regulated for office use via the zoning ordinance.
Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Retail/Office" should allow for a broad range
of retail and office uses; however, various retail and office zoning districts should be
established to restrict certain areas to specific functional and development characteristics.
Zoning regulations which implement the "Retail/Office" land use category should be specifically
tailored for the following types of commercial development:
Convenience Food Stores: There are about three dozen convenience food stores in Pontiac.
These stores are located throughout the city, but in greater concentrations in the southeast
and lesser concentrations in the north. This distribution is over a decade old and occurs for

Page 14.4

■
■

•
•
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

�good reason. Convenience food stores are necessary to serve a low income population with
limited access to automobiles. They provide an opportunity for• walk-up trade.

S trip or Thoroughfare-Oriented General Commercial Areas: As in most older cities, Pontiac's
arterial streets are lined wi th strip commercial development, much of it obsolete. This strip
commercial development presents aesthetic problems which are addressed in the
Thoroughfare Urban Design section of this plan. It also presents land use problems because
platted lots are too small for most new types of commercial development. The obsolete strip
pattern, combined with the declining buying power of Pontiac residents, has produced a very
high proportion of vacant commercial buildings and sites. Strip or thoroughfare-oriented
general commercial areas accommodate a range of convenience, highway service, commercial
recreation and office uses. General strip commercial areas are located along Auburn Avenue,
Baldwin Avenue, Huron Street, Joslyn Avenue, Perry Street, Telegraph Road and Walton
Boulevard.
Neighborhood and Community Shopping Centers: There are more than a dozen potential
local, neighborhood and community shopping center sites in Pontiac. Shopping centers, in
general, function better than strip commercial development. Existing shopping centers
should be improved and new ones developed when feasible.
Regional Shopping Centers: Auburn Mills is being developed just off I-75 between Baldwin
and Perry. Most of its 220-acre site is located in the City of Auburn Hills, but a small portion
of its site is in the City of Pontiac. Auburn Mills, will have approximately 2,000,000 square
feet of gross leasable area and a 40-mile trade radius. Additional retail facilities are
expected to be developed on out parcels.
Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Heavy Commercial/Distribution" should allow
for a range of retail and distribution uses; however, various zoning districts and special
land use regulations should be established to ensure compatible functional relationship
and development characteristics with respect to their immediate surroundings. These areas
are intended to provide direct access to major thoroughfares and freeways as required by uses such
as:
sales and service of motor vehicles, boats and other equipment or parts; retail sale of
landscape and building materials; sales of cabinets or furnishings in which some level of
custom fabrication is required; wholesalers; common carriers (i.e. U.P.S.); moving and
storage operations; as well as publishing.
Restaurants which cater to the motoring public would also be appropriately located in this district.
Particular care is required to enhance streetscape views of related vehicular use and outdoor display/
storage areas, as well as to adequately buffer adjacent residential districts. Sites of a size or
dimension which can not provide adequate screening or aesthetic improvements and satisfy the
spatial demands of a proposed use should not be occupied by said use.

Pennit auto repair and similar establishments only in very limited areas of the city; make
such uses subject to very tight screening and other appearance regulation to ensure that
they are visually inoffensive. Auto repair establishments abound along Pontiac's thoroughfares,
including some which ought to be primarily residential streets. Many of these establishments are
made unsightly by outdoor operations and storage. Screening and landscaping are absent. There is
an evident lack of concern for appearance on the part of property owners and operators. Building
and site maintenance standards are often abysmal. All of this is manifested in cracked and potholed parking areas , makeshift facing material on buildings, and ugly and excessive signage. It is

Page 14.5

�particularly important that buildings and sites be maintained to good standards and that vehicles
that are being stored and serviced be kept in areas which are not visible from public rights-of-way
and neighboring properties. Solid, well maintained masonry walls should be used to enclose outdoor
storage and service areas.

Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Transitional Industrial" should allow for a
very narrow range of uses which support industrial uses, but which are not themselves
industrial uses or activities. The "Transitional Industrial" category is intended to facilitate and
encourage land uses which can serve as a transition or buffer between industrial uses and less
intensive uses. Zoning regulations which implement the "Transitional Industrial" land use category
might permit by right non-industrial uses of the type permitted in adjacent non-industrial districts
and permit by special use approval industrial support uses. Such uses could include: 1) employee
parking, but not heavy truck maneuvering and parking; 2) offices which serve industrial uses; and 3)
indoor storage facilities and other buildings housing "quiet" uses, provided that no activity is
generated on the sides of buildings facing residential development.
Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Industrial" should allow for a broad range of
industrial and related or similar uses; however, various industrial-type zoning districts
should be established to restrict certain areas to specific functional and development
characteristics. Zoning regulations which implement the "Industrial" land use category should
include districts specifically tailored for light industrial uses and heavy industrial uses. Provision
should be made for industrial-type service uses which are too intensive to be included in "Heavy
CommerciaVDistribution" areas.
Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Public Service" indicate sites with existing
municipal offices, fire, library and hospital facilities. In the future, such facilities may be
established in other appropriate sites on an as-need basis. Sites with existing municipal office, fire,
library and hospital facilities may be used for other purposes, but only subject to appropriate due
process, including public hearings for plan amendments and zone changes. Zoning regulations
should be designed to ensure this happens.
Land Use Plan areas which are designated "Parks, Schools and Other Recreation and
Open Space" indicate sites with existing parks, schools and cemeteries. In the future, such
facilities may be established in other appropriate sites on an as-need basis. Sites with existing parks
and schools may be used for other purposes, but only subject to appropriate due process, including
public hearings for plan amendments and zone changet Zoning regulations should be designed to
ensure this happens.

The Land Use Plan area which is designated "Office Use Potential" indicates that an office
site of unspecified size may be established at the approximate location shown. Although the
size is unspecified, a facility of substantial magnitude and quality is envisioned. The location
indicated merits such a facility. Until the potential for such an office facility is ripe, the site should
be retained in its current use.
The Land Use Plan area which is designated "Public Service Use Potential" indicates that
a public service facility of unspecified size may be established at the approximate location
shown. The plan makes a portion of Hawthorne Park available for a public service facility. The
intent is to provide an opportunity for the relocation of the Pontiac State Hospital now at Clinton
Valley, thus freeing the Clinton Valley site for private reuse. Until the potential for this facility

Page 14.6

■
■

■
■

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

�relocation is ripe, the site should be retained in its current use.

The Land Use Plan area which is designated "Industrial Use Potential" indicates that the
area designated may be changed from residential to industrial use, but only when the new
industrial use extends to meet the adjoining industrial areas to the north, west and south.
Piecemeal redevelopment or use of individual residential sites is not envisioned; such piecemeal
redevelopment or use would be undesirable.
The Future Land Use Plan flexible options for a mix of different downtown land uses.
Among the uses suggested are the following:
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Specialty Retail/Entertainment
Retail/Office/High Density Residential
Office and Institutional
Public Parking
Open Space

A mixture of complementary activities must be concentrated in downtown. The activities in
such a mixture reinforce each other, but only once a "critical mass" is achieved. The mixture of uses
can generate enough pedestrian activity to make public spaces secure and lively and therefore
desirable. Diversity means more than one or two uses. The most important activities for downtown
are:
Offices and office services;
Technical research functions compatible with office facilities;
Retailing;
Hotels and conference centers;
Housing;
Performing arts;
Artists' studios and residences;
Entertainment and recreation; and
Special events.

Page 14.7

�Table 14-1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ FUTURE LAND USE PLAN TABLE of LAND USES _ _ _ _ _ __
Prepared by Robert K. Swarthout, Incorporated
Acres

Percent

865

7.2

3,776

30.5

723

5.8

High Density Residential/ Office / Retail

44

0.4

Transitional Office/ Medium Density Residential / Parking

67

0.5

Office

54

0.5

Retail / Office

381

3.3

Heavy Commercial / Distribution

265

2.1

1,966

13.8

28

0.2

527

4.2

1,434

10.6

103

0.9

2,311

20.0

12,544

100.0

Low Density Residential, 1 to 5 Dwellings Per Acre
Low-Medium Density Residential, 1 to 7 Dwellings Per Acre
Medium Density Residential, 1 to 20 Dwellings Per Acre

Industrial
Transitional Industrial
Public Service
Parks, Schools, and Other Recreation and Open Spaces
Downtown
Street, Alley and Railroad Right-of-Way

\

Page 14.8

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
II
II

�Table 14-2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TABLE of EXISTING LAND USES - - - - - - - - - Prepared by Pontiac Planning Division

Acres

Percent

2,990.9

23.8

Two Family

156.6

1.2

Multiple Family

546.8

4.4

31.0

0.2

Commercial

563.6

4.5

Warehouse&amp;Storage

139.4

1.1

1,286.4

10.3

160.0

1.3

1,467.1

11.7

Quasi-Public (Other Non-Profit Organizations)

246.1

2.0

Recreation

405.0

3.2

Vacant (With No Land Use)

2,239.9

17.9

Street &amp; Alley Right-of-Way

1,856.2

14.8

455.0

3.6

12,544.0

100.0

Single Family

Mobile Home Park

Industrial
Transportation, Communication, Utilities
Public (Federal, State, Municipal Organizations)

Railroad Right-of-Way

Page 14.9

�-

Table 14-3
TABLE of LAND USES PROPOSED by the PONTIAC PLANNING DIVISION'S 1985 PLAN

I
I
I

Acres

Percent

5,228

50.3

908

8.7

Proposed Industrial Areas

1,636

15.7

Public and Quasi-Public Areas

1,560

15.0

830
235

8.0
2.3

I

10,397

100.0

I
I
I
I
I
I

Proposed Residential Areas
Proposed Commercial Areas

Proposed Parks/ Open Space Areas:
Existing Park
Proposed Expansion/Development

\

I

I
I

I
I
I

I
Page 14.10

�'I
!

i
I

I
I
1/

on
,

·=

~·
~

"".'!1

L

=□

nn

=--1!

nri1,-,r.o □LJ

.i 11 , lul: i
.~=

i'7

u~
'
I

:

~I~~

,w

I

'

'

rnoodm
n
~

!

,j
~k.';;

-·t,

_ c,=J· cL=,=,J

-·-·-· ·-·-·- ·-·

i

- ·-·- ·- ·_J

�""'llJLGW~J~tl
l ~1.
I ')b~
_
C9-::Ja7r
.if--r-,,-yi
;, ll_j .
l Ur;i}Jr--»
! l~

- L

l;

Uuoed
,r:
,i fij
l

iI

:

a:

k
.

. . _.

Oe!!1ons

.

ll07r9r ~Qt\~,(

I\ ..

~ \I II \ \ ~ u j Ul) - --

_,.....~]1L _
0

_. _c

.,

.

LIi I

.

'

o8EE!Elc~ ~.,,..,

.

\

. - [

Jl~b -

\'-r"""ll"".I" I

, , ,.,,. ,

1.J.rr

- - 'l := -·_-JCT.Jr~

-;_

/'\-::-=~'f' ' ' J
,1 ?
• ' - (.

'·

~///)..._/~~~ -= = -=:-= :.:. .;.::_,

17

1,l)w D&lt;?nsit.y Re~idential,

I
l=1
W/41
I ___ J

Ll)w-Medium D!'nsity Rei1idPntial,
1 to 7 DwPlli11g« Per Acre

I

1 fp

~

~

[_ __ J

.·-,..;;rttr1'-=-'I :-·
c-=- ~
ft_
JC - JC -

MNlium Densit.y Residf'ntial ,
1 In 20 Dwellings Per Acre
High Density Re~idential /Office/ Retail
Transitiomt! Office/ J\Iedium Density
Rrsidential / Parking
OfficP

I

·=- 11 ---

!) ,,•n111nl~c; P '"! r f,,r?"tJ

Retail/ Offic,,
JJ nnvy C"ll1llll'l'Cin1 / Dist1ibution

FIS??,

Jr•

- 1-

J

~ ,,l
-.1 ~_,...- -·
·-

Public Service: F = Fire Department: L = Library;
H = Hospital

r--1

Parks, Schools, and Other Recreation and Open Space:
S = Schools; R = Recreational Building

~1 ]

Signifies Potential for Office Use on a site of unspecified
size at approximate location shown

E2l1

Signifies Potential for Public Service Use on a site of
unspecified size at approximnte loca tion shown

1__3_]

Signifies Potential for Industrial Use, but only if such use
extends to meet adjoining industrial area to north, west
rind south in accordnnce with relevnnt policies of I.he plan

l11d11 s t1 ial
Tr n11 «itin11:i l l11,l11 ~ti in f

Figure 14.2: FUTURE LAND USE MAP
~:,,o

fif!ltr&lt;'S

ii

□

i
i
i
i

LJ

~~~~
~o,;rirJ□□u ,~~
1a\~tuL_1~----Jl]C]

J.

i

!

i
i
i
i
i

d

,,

1 .

~,1~~t~
~~ 1 ~

t~ :- r1r_111

I

::;.--,
L=-Jbf

'--./,

/

""J11
=~
1l~ U~ U
Q~~~;~rwn1
mn[J[J[]]aJ□□[]
□ -lhL. · .
1

D\~

14.3 for prinritizrd thoroughfare improve111r&gt;11t nncl 14.4 for thoroughfare functional clnssificntion.

ii
i
i

--yl
!_. j !

�Figure 14.3
PRIORITIZED THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENT
See Figures 5.3 and 5.4 for unprioritized improvements

.•-••-•---•1.

--o

(J1-.

-_._w_al.to_n_B,..lv_d_.___·_-_..._-_-_·_-. .-_ -_-_·-_-_:_._·_
- _·_
•_
.. _-_-_-

(/)

O'l

C

i5
:
"'C •

Columbia Ave.

&lt;D o
. ,,r

--·-

--

Montcalm St.

Auburn Ave .

•••.....••.....•...•

!!···~~•• .• •,.11!-.~··• :..:,!.:'

Thoroughfare Improvement !
First Priority ( 1990-2000)

10 I

•

Grade Separation
First Priority (1990-2000)

Intersection Improvement
First Priority ( 1990-2000)

Boulevard and/ or Side Landscaping
First Priority ( 1990-2000)

Thoroughfare Improvement
Second Priority (1995-2000)

Thoroughfare Improvement
Third Priority (All.er 2000)

3 ...._ • :

:1•
i

~~1

o-·--o
Page 14.13

�•
•
•

Figure 14.4
THOROUGHFARE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
See Chapter 5 for thorough/are improvement details

■
■
■

-ci

a:

Walton Blvd.

(/)

Cl

C

'6
'"Cl

Q)

&gt;
,_...,_ _ _ _ _..,&lt;i:;;.l,_.;;c;.;;
_
o;;,;
lu;;,;m~b;;,;ia;;.;.;A.;;ve;.;.__

ai
&gt;

,____
1

0

&lt;(

Svi
....,0

•■

Montcalm St.

-ti

a:
.s=

a.

e

Cl
Q)

ai

M-59

Elizabeth Lake Ad.

t--

Huron St.

i

Auburn Ave.
&gt;

ai

.;1 .........

Cl
C

~

Qi
.s=
:5

....J
C

·-e

"'

~

0

South Blvd.

U)

1 MILE
"'""""' - - - ·

.£
~
C

e

u.

Freeway: right-of-way 250 feet

·----

I

Trunklines: right-of-way 120 to 250 feet
Major Arterial: right-of-way 90 to 150 feet
Major Collector: right-of-way 60 to 150 feet

" ~ - "';
.. ,Iii

Note: Roads not shown on this map are classified local.

Page 14.14

t~,
o·

~

.'O

I

J

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009772">
                <text>Pontiac_Comprehensive-Plan_1990s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009773">
                <text>City of Pontiac Planning Commission, City of Pontiac, Oakland County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009774">
                <text>circa 1993</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009775">
                <text>Pontiac 2010, A New Reality</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009776">
                <text>The Pontiac 2010, A New Reality Comprehensive Plan was prepared by the City of Pontiac Planning Commission with the assistance of Robert K. Swarthout, Incorporated circa 1993.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009777">
                <text>Robert K. Swarthout, Incorporated (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009778">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009779">
                <text>Pontiac (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009780">
                <text>Oakland County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009781">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009783">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009784">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009785">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009786">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038419">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54801" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59071">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e827c4ac4a8c2216cbdf352209331007.pdf</src>
        <authentication>62a07fd6849b5ea447757956a66f78b1</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1009883">
                    <text>L
r

[

�I

~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

City ofRochester Hills
Oakland Counry, Michigan

MASTER

LA.No

USE

PLAN

March, 1992
Adopted in accordance with Act 285 of1931, As Amended
The Municipal Planning Act

~

Public Hearings: March 17, 1992
Adopted: March 31, 1992

I

'

I
I

d~i.~
Nicholas E.

Gallopoios

Planning Commission Chairperson

~ ✓~--~_,,
Patricia A. Goodwin

Planning Commission Secretary

�I

~
r

I
I

I

•

City of Rochester Hills
Master Plan
City of Rochester Hills
Mayor and City Council

Billie M. Ireland, Mayor
Scot Beaton, Council President
Jon A. Buller
Paul S. Funk
Barnett Jones
Gary Peters
Patricia Roberts
Lauren Shepherd
City of Rochester Hills
Planning Commission

Nicholas E. Gallopoulos, Chainnan
William Boswell
Paul S. Funk, Vice Chainnan
Eric Kaiser
Eugene S. Nowicki
James Rosen
George Sadowski
Lauren Shepherd*
Patricia Somerville
Gene Ferrera
Director of Planning and Zoning

Patricia A. Goodwin
Planning Consultant

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated
Special Consultant on NatuTal FeatuTes

Todd Holloway
Special C01Wlltant on Demographics

Patricia Becker
*Member through November, 1991

Adopted
March 31, 1992

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
POLICIES OF THE MASTER PLAN
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION POLICIES
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE POLICIES
TRANSPORTATION POLICIES
HOUSING POLICIES
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
COMMUNITY FACILITIES POLICIES
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES
PLANNING COORDINATION POLICIES

Page
l
4
4
5

10
14
16
23
25
26

27
28

NATURAL FEATURES
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
METHODOLOGY
WOODLAND COVER MAP
WETLAND COVER MAP
HABITAT SENSITIVITY MAP
PRIMARY HABITAT ZONES
DEFINITIONS

41

POPULATION AND HOUSING
POPULATION TRENDS
AGE DISTRIBUTION
OTHER POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
SUMMARY

43
43
46
48
49
50

ECONOMIC ANALYSES
PROJECTION OF FUTURE COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
MARKET ANALYSIS
FUTURE COMMERCIAL IMPACT OF
CITY OF ROCHESTER
FUTURE COMMERCIAL IMPACT OF
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES
OFFICE DEVELOPMENT
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

51

29

30
32
34
36
39

51
52
65
65

69
71

URBAN DESIGN
INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
TRANSITIONS
RELATION OF BUILDINGS TO THE ENVIRONMENT
ENTRANCEWAYS
REVITALIZATION OF THE OLDE TOWNE DISTRICT
DETENTION AND RETENTION PONDS

103
107
112

LAND USE
EXISTING LAND USE
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN

113
113
122

UTILITIES

132

78
78
92
99

�List of Tables

II
II
II
II

II

Table

Title

PH-1
PH-2
PH-3
PH-4
PH-5
PH-6

POPULATION COUNTS
PERCENTAGE OF GROWTH IN POPULATION
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
TRENDS IN AGE DISTRIBUTION
HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

44
44
43

E-1
E-2
E-3
E-4

POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS
NET DISPOSABLE INCOME
RETAIL SALES PER HOUSEHOLD
1990 ANTICIPATED AVERAGE SALES
PER SQUARE FOOT
1990 EXPECTED SPENDING POTENTIAL AND
SUPPORTABLE BUILDING AREA

53
54
56

E-5
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-10
E-11
E-12
E-13
E-14
E-15
E-16
D-1
D-2
D-3

LU-1
LU-2
LU-3
LU-4
LU-5

1995 EXPECTED SPENDING POTENTIAL AND
SUPPORTABLE BUILDING AREA
2000 EXPECTED SPENDING POTENTIAL AND
SUPPORTABLE BUILDING AREA
2010 EXPECTED SPENDING POTENTIAL AND
SUPPORTABLE BUILDING AREA
TOTAL SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL LAND
1990-2010
TOTAL SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL LAND
AT CAPACITY
EMPLOYMENT FORECAST
FUTURE OFFICE SPACE DEMAND
IN OAKLAND COUNTY
OFFICE DEVELOPMENT 1981-1990
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 1981-1990
EXISTING INDUSTRIAL/RESEARCH PARKS
ANNUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 1960-1990
INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY TABLE
INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
EXISTING LAND USE - 1991
ACREAGE CHANGE COMPARISON
EXISTING LAND USE COMPARISON:
1973, 1980, AND 1991
FUTURE LAND USE ACREAGE
COMPARISON OF FUTURE LAND ACREAGE
BETWEEN 1986 AND 1992 MASTER PLANS

46

48
49

57
59
60
61
62
63
64

70
71
72
75
74
76
87
88
89
117
118
119
124
125

�II

•Ill
II

•Ill
Ill
II

..
■

II
II
II
~

•

List of Figures

Figure

P-I
P-II

Title

COMMERCIAL BASE ANALYSIS POLICY OPTIONS -FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
POLICY FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

18
20

W-II
W-III

WOODLAND COVER MAP
WETLAND COVER MAP
HABITAT SENSITIVITY MAP

33
35

PH-I
PH-II

POPULATION PERCENTAGE GROWTH
TRENDS IN AGE DISTRIBUTION

45

D-I
D-II

INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
PLANNED PATHWAYS IN RELATION TO
INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
TOTAL PATHWAY SYSTEM
VISUAL IMPRESSIONS OF OLDE TOWNE
VISUAL IMPRESSIONS OF OLDE TOWNE
VISUAL IMPRESSIONS OF OLDE TOWNE
STYLISTIC COMPATIBILITY OF FACADES
IN OLDE TOWNE
STYLISTIC COMPATIBILITY OF FACADES
IN OLDE TOWNE

80

111

LU-I
LU-II

EXISTING LAND USE - .1991
FUTURE LAND USE

116
123

U-I
U-II

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
SANITARY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

133
134

W-I

D-III
D-IV
D-V
D-VI
D-VII
D-VIII

37
47

83
84

108
109
110
111

�Introduction

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•

Introduction
For the past 30 years, the City of Rochester Hills, and
its predecessor the Township of Avon, have carried out a very
thorough and consistent planning and zoning process.
In
1964, the Township of Avon adopted a Future Land Use Plan to
guide development in the community.
On January 2, 1974,
after 18 months of comprehensive study, the Planning Commission adopted a new Master Land Use Plan for the community .
Adoption of a new zoning ordinance on August 24 , 1977 and new
rapid growth in the community necessitated a review and
updating of the Master Land Use Plan.
The updated plan was
adopted on February 20, 1979.
In 1986, the city again
adopted a completely revised Master Land Use Plan on July 15,
1986. This plan addressed the extensive residential, commercial, and industrial development which had occurred in the
city during the 1980's.
The
city
established
a
Citizen's
Advisory
Growth
Management Committee in 1989 which analyzed the urbanization
process in Rochester Hills and surrounding communities and
made specific recommendations for controlling and planning
future growth and development in the City of Rochester Hills.
Concurrent with the work of the Growth Management Committee,
the Rochester Hills Planning Commission has, for the past 18
months, been in the process of developing a new Master Plan
for
the
city.
The
Planning
Commission has met with
representatives of the Growth Management Commit tee and has
carefully considered all of its recommendations in development of the new Master Plan.
The plan differs from the 1986 Master Plan in several
ways.
The new plan places more emphasis on control of the
amount and location of commercial and industrial development,
while still recognizing
the need for a strong property tax
base in the community.
The plan also contains new, more
flexible approaches toward economic recycling of previously
developed properties.
The plan also places more emphasis on
improving the visual quality of the city as it nears full
development.
All data on land uses, natural features, and
demographics in the plan were newly compiled during the past
year, representing a total updating of all categories of
information from the 1986 Master Plan used in the current
plan.
The
follows:
1.

primary

purposes

of

the

new

Master

To improve the physical environment
setting for human activities.

-1-

of

Plan

are

the city as

as
a

�2.

To promote the general heal th, safety, and welfare of
city residents by making the city more functional,
beautiful, decent, healthful, interesting and efficient.

3.

To promote the public interest or the interest of the
community at large, rather than the interests of individuals or special groups within the community.

4.

To facilitate the democratic determination and implementation of community policies and physical development.
The plan is primarily a policy instrument.
The plan
constitutes a declaration of long-range goals and objectives.
The plan facilitates the democratic process by
fixing responsibility for determining policies with the
Planning Commission, which in turn provides an opportunity for citizen participation.

5.

To effect political and
munity development.

6.

To inject long-range considerations
ation of short-range actions.

7.

To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on
the making of political decisions concerning the physical development of the community.

technical

coordination in cominto the determin-

The new Master Plan contains the following chapters:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Policies of the Master Plan
Natural Features
Population and Housing
Economic Analyses
Urban Design
Land Use
Utilities

In March of 1990, the City of Rochester Hills adopted a
new Master Recreation Plan for the city.
This plan has been
carefully reviewed in development in the new Master Land Use
Plan and is an integral part of the total master land use
planning process of the city.
The 1990 Master Recreation
Plan was developed through a comprehensive planning process
which included consideration of population trends and physical
characteristics
of
the
city,
review
of
existing
recreation services and facilities, assessment of city-wide
recreation opportunities and deficiencies, and identification
of long-term recreation goals and policies.
The 1990 Master
Recreation Plan was also designed so that it meets the

-2-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•■
•
•■
•
•■

requirements of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources
for a certifiable local recreation master plan.
This will
ensure that the city is eligible for grants and other funding
for recreation facilities development from the State of
Michigan •
In July of 1989, the Rochester Hills Planning Commission
adopted the Rochester Hills Traffic Study and Comprehensive
Transportation Plan prepared by BRW Incorporated of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
This plan was amended in 1991 to include a
study of the Adams Road Corridor.
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan serves as the major thoroughfare component of
the city's master planning process.
This plan was designed
to provide an understanding of current and projected trends
in traffic in the city, and to present a comprehensive
program of solutions designed to address problems associated
with traffic.
The primary study area for the Transportation
Plan are the boundaries of the City of Rochester Hills and
the City of Rochester.
The secondary study area included a
more extensive area of the region to account for significant
growth trends in communities adjacent to and nearby Rochester
Hills and Rochester.
Several of the chapters in this plan were based on more
detailed technical reports prepared by the city's planning
consultant and planning staff.
These reports are available
for public use in the Rochester Hills Planning Department .

-3-

�Policies of the
Master Plan

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•■
•■
•■

Policies of the Master Plan
Citizen Participation Policies
The Rochester Hills Planning Commission has historically
placed emphasis on effective citizen participation in the
planning process. This approach will be continued into the
future .
AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

The city will continue to inform the citizenry on a
timely basis of all planning issues and proposals under consideration.
Maps, written reports, and other data on specific
planning issues will be available to the public. The professional planning staff of the city wi 11 be accessible to the
public for consultation on community development issues.
Public workshops and hearings will be scheduled as needed for
planning and community development topics •
EXPLICIT POLICY PLANNING

The planning commission will continue to develop explicit
written planning policies to guide and portray its decisionmaking process.
Policies provide continuity in the planning
process and give assurance to the public that planning
decision-making will follow the rationale of the adopted
master plan of the city.
PROFESSIONAL COURTESY

The planning commission will continue to extend every
possible courtesy to citizens and other persons who appear
before the commission on any planning matter.
Every attempt
will be made to ensure that each citizen is fully heard and
that their comments are carefully considered .
THE GOOD OF THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY

In evaluating citizen comments and suggestions,
the
planning commission will consider how specific planning recommendations affect, not only one part of the city or one
property owner, but the overall sound development of the
entire city.
Short-range actions will be carefully evaluated
to determine what long-range considerations or results they
may bring.
-4-

■

�•
Playgrounds

II

•

The primary purpose of playgrounds is to provide active
play areas for elementary and junior high school children.
Playgrounds should include play equipment such as swings,
slides, and climbing apparatus. Open space for pick-up sports
should be provided if the area is large enough and such
activities do not conflict with adjoining residential areas .
A playground should be accessible to children without crossing
a major street and usually should be within one-half mile of
any home.
School playgrounds are typical examples of this
type of facility.
Playgrounds may have smaller picnic areas
for small groups.
Partial or full fencing may be necessary to
protect children from traffic and to contain balls used in
play areas.
Playfield

Playfields are areas which are set aside for organized
sports.
A playfield may serve a large portion of Rochester
Hills or may serve the entire city.
A playfield should have
adequate parking and vehicular access on a secondary or
collector street.
Playfields must also be provided with
adequate off-street parking to meet the needs of multiple-team
sport activities.
Special Facilities

Special recreation facilities should be provided on a
city-wide basis to meet the recreation needs of the Rochester
Hills population.
Such special facilities include swimming
pools, large ice rinks ( artificial and natural), community
centers,
indoor recreation facilities,
golf courses,
and
tennis courts.
Special facilities must have adequate parking
and access from a primary or secondary thoroughfare. Special
facilities may exist separately or may be planned as part of a
major park .

I

Natural Areas

Natural areas are undeveloped portions of the city which
can serve as a greenbelt, a nature preserve area, or as a special recreation area for hiking or bicycling.

-6-

I

i
I

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Major Parks
Major parks are community-wide facilities which combine
two or more of the elements listed above.
Elements within a
major park should be designed so that they are properly
separated.
Passive and active recreation activities should
not conflict with one another.
A major park should include
large picnic areas for different size groups, active play
areas and children's playground equipment.
Vehicular access
should be provided by primary or secondary streets.
PRESERVATION OF LAND ADJACENT TO CLINTON RIVER AND OTHER WATER
BODIES
Land adjacent to bodies of water and the Clinton River
and its tributaries should be preserved for larger lot and
open space residential uses.
Low density areas around existing watercourses should be established to decrease potential
pollution problems.
The 1992 Master Plan contains new information on wetlands and other natural features adjacent to the
Clinton River and its tributaries .
BIKE PATHWAY AND TRAILWAY SYSTEM
The city should continue to implement plans to provide an
interconnected system of bike paths and trailways throughout
the city.
The bike pathway and trail way system should link
various residential areas to recreation facilities, schools,
shopping, and other destination points .
CLINTON RIVER
The city should protect
the Clinton River and
its
tributaries to maintain an acceptable level of water and
environment quality for all types of water recreation use .
PAINT CREEK TRAILWAY
The city should continue to encourage the development of
the Paint Creek Trailway.

-7-

�•
COST OF OPERATING RECREATION FACILITIES

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

The
city
should
carefully
consider
the
costs
of
maintenance and operation when planning proposed recreation
facilities.
Each proposed recreation facility should be
carefully evaluated to determine its impact on the city
budget,
the tax burden it may create, and the overall
comparison of costs to benefits to residents of the city .
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
TIES

COOPERATION

IN PLANNING RECREATION FACILI-

Rochester Hills should cooperate and coordinate with
other communities, Oakland County, the Region, and the State
of Michigan in the planning and development of recreation
sites, facilities, and programs. The city should define which
recreation facilities it can best provide and maintain and
should focus on these improvements.
Some kinds of recreation
facilities and services can be provided by other levels of
government .
COOPERATION WITH SCHOOL DISTRICTS

The City of Rochester Hills should encourage cooperation
with school districts in providing recreation facilities and
programs.
The Rochester Community Schools, Avondale School
District,
and
private
and
parochial
schools
should be
consulted on relevant recreation planning proposals .
RECREATION COMMISSION

The city should utilize the full
resources of the
Rochester-Avon Recreation Authority in planning and implementing adopted plans for recreation-oriented facilities .
PUBLIC ACCESS

The city should encourage
access to rivers and streams .

-8-

and develop

increased public

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
•

NEW OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION APPROACHES
The city should actively support new approaches to open
space preservation being considered by the state legislature
such as land banking and transfer of development rights .

PURCHASE PROGRAM
The city should continue to pursue an aggressive program
of land acquisition for public passive and active recreation
use within budgetary limitations .

I

-9-

I

I

I

�•
•■
•
•
•
•I
•I
•I
I
I
I

Transportation Policies
Note: The city adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Plan
in 1989.
These transportation
policies are in agreement with
the
recommendations
of
that
plan .
ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS
Thoroughfares in Rochester Hills
according to the following system:
.
•
.
•
.

should

be

classified

Principal Arterial
Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector
Local

Local streets should serve abut ting properties within a
neighborhood.
Collector streets should gather vehicle trips
from
local
streets
and
feed
them
to arterial streets .
Arterial streets should be of adequate capacity and design to
serve both through traffic and internal traffic circulation
needs in the city.
Principal arterials should serve through
traffic primarily and should be located and designed so they
do not disrupt the quality or viability of residential,
commercial, and industrial areas of the city .
INTERCEPTION OF THROUGH-TRAFFIC
A strategy to
intercept
through-traffic originating
outside Rochester Hills and Rochester and divert it to
selected identified routes should be developed.
This diversion strategy in part includes and affects ro~dways and
communities outside Rochester Hills/Rochester.
This strategy
should at least include:

,

1.

A north/south arterial generally located near the eastern
city boundary to intercept traffic from the east and to
provide a high quality connection to M-59.

2.

The development of a north/south arterial between M-59
and Silver Bell Road to attract traffic originating in
northern Rochester Hills and north of the city and

-10-

I

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
•I
I

•I

destined to the Oakland Technology Park,
destinations to the west .

SIX LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAYS
Six-lane major arterial roadways should generally not be
built because of sensitive land use and environmental adjacencies and the high capital cost of such improvements.
The
volume of traffic projected for many major mile roadways in
the city for the Year 2005 is greater than twice the roadway's
current capacity.
This traffic volume could generally not be
accommodated by roadways less than six paved lanes .
However, because of the primarily residential land use
and environmental characteristics along most roadways in the
city, six lanes would be incompatible with adjacent land use
and/ or the environment and should, therefore, not be bui 1 t.
In addition,
the
capital
cost
to
acquire the required
right-of-way to construct the six-lane roadway greatly exceeds
the funding capability.
The only exception to this finding is
Rochester Road south of Avon, if a boulevard cross-section is
provided.
The reason for this is the commercial nature of the
road and forecasted volume of traffic .

ACCEPTANCE OF LOWER LEVEL OF TRAFFIC SERVICE
Major roadway widening and other planned transportation
projects will not be able to accommodate the 2005 forecasted
traffic at an acceptable level of service.
Therefore, the
level of service along selected arterial roadways will be
below accepted standards.
This is the result of the trade-off
between growth in Rochester Hills and the surrounding communities, and the unacceptability of six-lane roadways and/or
lack of funding.
The acceptance of a lower level of traffic
service is necessary in order to preserve essential features
of environmental quality in the city.

EXTRANEOUS TRAFFIC IN NEIGHBORHOODS
Residential neighborhoods in Rochester Hills should be
reasonably free of inter-sectional cut-through or extraneous
traffic which disrupts their quietude and safety.
As a city
matures and traffic volumes and congestion increase on major
arterial streets, there is a tendency for motorists to seek
shortcuts through residential neighborhoods to save time and

-11-

I

the Palace, and

�•
•
•
•
•I
•I
•I
•I
•
•I

avoid congestion.
Any modifications to the local street
pattern or any major street closures should be done only after
an overall comprehensive traffic analysis of a neighborhood
and surrounding affected areas.
Experience has shown that the
unplanned random closing of streets usually only compounds
traffic in adjacent areas .
COLLECTOR STREETS

Collector streets serve four purposes:
( 1) to collect
vehicle trips from local streets and feed them to major
thoroughfares; (2) to interconnect sections of a neighborhood;
(3) to provide access to neighborhood facilities such as
schools or parks; and ( 4) to provide means of ingress and
egress to neighborhoods for emergency vehicles such as police
cars, fire trucks, and ambulances.
A system of collector streets to serve the above defined
purposes should continue to be developed. This process should
recognize the unique characteristics of each neighborhood,
should be flexible, and should be based on a common set of
criteria that relate to the purposes of collectors.
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION

Pedestrian and bicycle ways should be developed throughout the city in accordance with the Pedestrian Non-motorized
Vehicular Pathway Plan.
A pedestrian or bicycle way should be
more than a simple paved sidewalk.
It should include shade
trees, benches for rest, drinking fountains, and works of art.
Pedestrian and bicycle ways should be designed to connect
residential neighborhoods with adjoining city parks, schools,
neighborhood shopping areas, and other attractions.
ALTERNATIVES TO SINGLE-OCCUPANT AUTO TRAVEL

The provision and encouragement of other than singleoccupant auto travel offers potential to reduce congestion and
should be considered and pursued where feasible.
Alternatives
include:
Transit service
. Car pools/van pools
. Staggered work hours
. Metering of freeways

-12-

I

�Iii

•
•
•II
II
II

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

The City of Rochester Hills should work with state,
regional, county, and other municipal authorities to reduce
vehicular travel.
The successful implementation of these
travel demand management strategies has the potential to
reduce peak hour travel by five to twenty percent .

LAND USE/TRAFFIC DEMAND RELATIONSHIPS
Rochester Hills should achieve a balanced relationship
between its transportation and land use systems.
There should
be an adequate number of streets of appropriate carrying
capacity to serve the city's land use pattern. Whenever new,
more intensive land use developments are proposed, the city
should analyze the traffic which will be generated and how the
increased traffic will affect the thoroughfare system.
The city should require developers of large projects or
projects which have high traffic impacts to prepare a traffic
impact analysis as part of the project approval process .

LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION INTERFACE
The interface between the transportation system and
adjacent land uses should be complementary.
All roadway
upgrading should be completed in a manner which is sensitive
to adjacent land uses and environmental characteristics .
Intensive development areas should be served by special access
roads
or
service
drives
rather
than
direct
access
to
heavily-traveled arterial roadways.
The number of driveways
penetrating a major thoroughfare should be limited.
Offstreet parking areas should be developed to minimize conflicts
with through traffic .

THOROUGHFARE AESTHETICS
Thoroughfares in Rochester Hills should be visually
pleasing to both the traveling motorist as well as to the
pedestrian and to persons who view streets from adjoining
land-use areas.
Trees and other landscaping in and adjacent
to the right-of-way and special design effects such as
boulevards or parkways should be encouraged.
Billboards and
signage should be discouraged through effective zoning and
sign regulations .

-13-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
I

•

AMENITIES FOR HIGH DENSITY HOUSING
High- and medium-density housing should be located near
amenities which will make such areas desirable and ensure
their long-term viability.
For example, apartments benefit
from proximity to a natural or wooded area or a major city
park.
Apartment and townhouse developments are often more
desirable when they are within walking distanc .e of shopping
and entertainment districts •

REDEVELOPMENT OF LAND FILL AREAS
The area of Rochester Hills generally bounded by Avon,
Dequindre, and School has historically been the location of
several land fills and other refuse disposal operations.
The
city should actively promote the gradual redevelopment of this
area for special recreational facilities, residential development, and light industry. Special recreational facilities
could include the use of former land fill sites for a golf
course, winter sports complex, botanical garden, arboretum,
tennis/racquetball club, fitness center, and similar uses.
Strategic infilling of new residential development on some
parts of the area should be encouraged.
Specialized eva I uat i on s for presence of t ox i c was t e ma t er i a l s w i l l need t o be
completed before any
for new land uses.

former

land

fill

areas

can

be

recycled

HOUSING FOR ELDERLY

II

Housing for the elderly should generally be located where
supporting facilities such as health care, shopping, and
recreation are readily accessible.

I
I
I
I
-15-

I

�II
Commercial Development Policies

II
II
II
II
II
II
II

-II
II
II
II
II
II

AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

A detailed Commercial Base Analysis was prepared for the
new Master Plan.
It sets forth a more refined evaluation of
the effect of disposable income on the need for commercial
development in the city than was contained in the 1986 Master
Plan.
Review of Options for Policy Development
Rochester Hills is largely a residential community. Given
the current number of households in the city, and considering
those projected to be constructed over the next 10 to 20 years
as the city approaches "build-out," there is clear need for
commercial activity to support the needs of those households.
Ideally, the city would like to achieve the ideal amount
of commercial development -- not "too much" nor "too little"
commercial development for the needs of the residents.
The
master plan provides the opportunity to determine the best
estimate of the "just right" amount of commercial development
for the city.
A reasonable estimate of the appropriate amount of
commercial development can be determined based on sound
analysis of the present and projected future,
and good
judgement of how the projections should be applied to the
city.
In preparing the master plan, the Planning Commission
has a responsibility to make the most reasonable and soundest
estimate of the necessary and supportable amount of commercial
development.
Baseline for Projection of Future Commercial Land Use
The Commercial Base Analysis has determined the level of
commercial property development that is supportable by the
residents of the city in absolute terms for the years 1990,
1995, 2000, 2010, and at "build out."
The supportable commercial land for 1990 was estimated to
be 371 acres.
The analysis also includes an estimate of 504
acres as the actual amount of developed commercial land in
1990.
The difference of approximately 133 acres between the
1990 "actual" and 1990 "supportable" is attributed to be
largely the result of commercial activity from populations

-16-

�•
•IJI
II
II
II
II

•
•
•
•
•
•

outside the city.
Because the ¥acancy rate in 1990 is about
5%, it should be treated as if it were occupied.
Further,
because there are no indications of permanent vacancy or
abandonment, or of a widespread lack of customers, the 1990
actual development must be considered viable and realistic for
projecting future commercial development .
Policy Options for Future Commercial Development
Having established the baseline for future projections of
supportable commercial development as the actual 1990 level of
504 acres, the issue that must be resolved is: What should be
the policy for future development?
In other words:
How do we
handle the 133 acre difference between the current actual and
supportable as we project into the future?
Figure P-I shows in graphic form, the results of the
Commercial Base Analysis,
the actual 1990 baseline,
and
projections of four different scenarios related to the four
policy options discussed below.
While there may be more
options that could be considered, those presented represent
the basic options available.
The policy options and scenarios are:
1) Support no commercial activity beyond that solely for the
residents of Rochester Hills.
This is represented by
capping present development at 504 acres to correspond to
the projected supportable acreage at build-out of 503 .
Implementing such a policy would probably result in
untenable levels of congestion in the existing business
because there is no viable way to prevent outsiders from
shopping in Rochester Hills.
It probably is acknowledged
that some amount of commercial property beyond that which
is supportable by the residents is necessary and justifiable.
This leads to the three additional policy
options.
2) Reduce the amount of commercial activity from external
populations by 50% at build-out.
This policy prescribes
that Rochester Hills would effectively transfer 1/2 of
the support of outside communities that currently exists
to those outside communities as well as the incremental
development for those communities.
This scenario would
be reflected as a decrease of 11 acres every 5 years from
the 133 acres differential.
This would be an extremely
aggressive growth management policy.

-17-

�--

····••1••·····
Figure P-1

Commercial Base Analysis
Policy Options -- Future Commercial Development

800
1990 Zoned Commercial

700

Support External Growth
Limit Growth for Extemal
to Present Amount

1990 Actual

600

Reduce Commercial by 50%
for External

I
I--'

500

o:&gt;
I

No Commercial for External -Cap at Present Amount
133 Acres Diff.
36%

ACRES

400

Projected Supportable

300
200

YEAR

ACTUAL

1990
1995

504

2000

371
401

430
488

2010
2020

100

SUPPORTABLE

503

50% LESS

MAINTAIN 133

MAINTAIN 36%

504
534

504
523
541
570
570

563

504
545
585

621

664

636

684

0
1990

1995

2000

2005

YEAR

2010

2015

2020

■

�II

II

II
II

II
II
II
II

-II
II
II
II
II

II

3) Limit commercial development to amount supportable at
build-out plus specified increment.
At build-out, the
amount of commercial land use would be no greater than
that supportable by the population at build-out, plus an
increment which
is equal
to the current difference
between that supportable by the current population and
which is actually in place (1990).
4) Continue to support incremental growth in commercial
activity resulting from growth in external populations.
This policy assumes that overall patterns of development
would not change from today and Rochester Hills would
continue to support the additional development needed to
support growth of outside communities.
This would be
reflected as a constant percentage of 36% greater than
projected supportable.
This policy would probably not be
supported by a wide spectrum of residents.
The Planning Commission recommends that policy option No.
3 be adopted in the master plan to guide future commercial
development in the city.
This policy option is illustrated
graphically in Figure P-II.

ROCHESTER ROAD COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Commercial development on Rochester Road should continue
to be 1 imi ted to the three established commercial nodes at
Auburn, Hamlin, and Avon Roads.
This policy will prevent
linear commercial sprawl and protect the viability of existing
commercial nodes and the quality of surrounding residential
neighborhoods.

ROCHESTER ROAD:

A SPECIAL URBAN DESIGN DISTRICT

The Rochester Road corridor should be designated as a
Special Urban Design District with higher standards for sign
control, facade design, landscaping, screening, and parking
lot design.
Although many of the developments are already
completed, the creation of a special urban design district
wil 1 affect the replacement and updating of faci 1 i ti es which
will be an ongoing process in the area for many years.
The
master plan contains a section which sets forth special urban
design concepts and standards for the Rochester Road business
corridor.
Many of the design ideas will require voluntary
compliance or implementation on the part of business owners
since they cannot be regulated by ordinance.

-19-

�--····~·-····· •
Figure P-II

Policy for Future Commercial Development
Rochester Hills Master Land Use Plan

800
1990 Zoned Commercial

700
600

I

""

Limit Grow1h tor External
to Present Amount

1990 Actual

IV
0

I

Potential for Revised Zoning

500
133 Acfes Dilf.
36%

ACRES

400

Projected Supportable

300
200

YEAR

ACTUAL

1990

504

SUPPORTABLE

504

371
401

1995

534
563

430
488

2000
2010
2020

100

MAINTAIN 133

621
636

503

0
1990

1995

2000

2005

YEAR

2010

2015

2020

�BEAUTIFICATION OF M-59/ROCHESTER ROAD AREA

II
II

II
II

II
II
II

•II
II

•
•
•

The intersection of M-59 and Rochester Road is a major
visual entranceway to the city and its shopping areas.
This
area is presently barren and unattractive.
The city should
take the initiative to start a major landscaping program
within and near the right-of-way of these two thoroughfares.
Appropriate county and state agencies should participate.
Flowering apple and pear trees, evergreens, and other plant
materials should be planted to improve the visual quality of
this area on a year-around basis.
State funding is specifically earmarked for such a beautification effort.
WALTON BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

Commercial development on Wal ton Boulevard
tinue to be limited to the existing development
at the intersections with Adams and Livernois.
will prevent commercial sprawl and protect the
existing homes and the quality of surrounding
neighborhoods.

should conat the nodes
This policy
viability of
residential

REVITALIZATION OF AUBURN ROAD COMMERCIAL AREAS

The city should help spark revitalization of deteriorated
strip commercial frontage on Auburn Road through planning of
strategic infrastructure improvements such as road paving,
shared parking, landscaping, and other needed improvements.
RESEARCH/OFFICE DEVELOPMENT

Additional land areas should be planned for research/
office development within mixed-use business districts based
on the strategic economic location of Rochester Hills in
Oakland County in proximity to companies which require support
services from firms typically located in research/office
development areas.
OFFICE DEVELOPMENT

Office development
should
be encouraged at
planned
locations which are compatible with and complementary to residential development.
Office land uses can be used as a
transition between industrial or commercial areas and nearby
residential neighborhoods.

-21-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

Non-residential mixed-use development areas should be
Such areas will
considered for strategic areas of the city.
provide greater development flexibility and help strengthen
the city's tax base .
A non-residential mixed-use category will include the
following uses:
Office, research/office, light industrial,
and hotel/motel.
A non-residential mixed-use category would
not
include
development
of
heavy
industry,
residential
development, and commercial uses not related to the primary
permitted uses. Performance standards for regulating specific
developments will need to be developed as part of the revision
of the city's zoning ordinance which will be carried out after
adoption of the new master plan •
OFF-STREET PARKING

All commercial facilities in Rochester Hills should have
adequate off-street parking.
Parking facilities development
programs should be designed to meet the needs of older,
established commercial districts.
Proposed new commercial
developments should continue to be stringently reviewed to
ensure that adequate off-street parking is provided.

-22-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Community Facilities Policies
LIBRARY FACILITIES
The City of Rochester Hills has in place a library system
which is responsive to the changing needs of its population.
Library facilities are readily accessible and have been
designed so that they provide an aesthetically pleasing and
intellectually stimulating experience for the library patron.
POLICE PROTECTION FACILITIES
Police
protection
facilities
should
be adequate to
maintain the security, safety, and wel 1-being of Rochester
Hills residents.
Police facilities should be located to allow
deployment of adequate manpower within minimum response time
to all parts of the city.
The design and maintenance of
police facilities should be maintained at all times at a level
which allows the department to function at a high level of
efficiency .
FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
Fire protection facilities should meet the standards for
fire company distribution published by the American Insurance
Association.
Fire facilities should be reevaluated on a
regular basis as new development occurs in Rochester Hills to
determine if modifications or additions to facilities are
needed to serve new development .
MUNICIPAL OFFICE SPACE
Modern, comfortable office space should be provided to
house all departments of the municipal government.
The
location of Rochester Hills municipal offices should be convenient to the citizenry and all municipal office installations should be provided with an adequate amount of convenient
off-street parking .

-23-

•

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL

In 1990, the city prepared a "Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management
Plan."
The city should continue
to actively
participate
in area-wide solid waste
disposal
planning.
Recycling centers should be planned as an integral part of the
city's land development pattern .
ONGOING MONITORING,
TIES

REPAIR

AND

The city should continue its program of monitoring,
repairing,
and
replacement
of sewers,
water mains,
and
roadways.
The city's goal should be to detect problems with
the utility systems and roads while they are still manageable
and can be repaired at a reasonable cost .
As deemed
necessary, the city should study special problems and also
plan for the long-range public utility needs of the city .
DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PUBLIC UTILITIES

New developments that generate a substantial increase in
utility demand should be required to install or help pay for
installation of the new utility services.
The city and
developers should cooperate on the design and construction of
new sewers and water mains.
Developers should be required to
submit a traffic impact statement to determine the amount of
additional traffic to be generated, the impact on traffic
patterns, and the transportation improvements that will be
needed .
COORDINATION OF UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS

The city should coordinate utility and street reconstruction or replacement projects to save costs and minimize
inconvenience to residents.
The city should maintain ongoing
communication with all departments, agencies, and commissions,
within and outside the city, that are concerned with utilities
and roads in Rochester Hills .

-24-

•

REPLACEMENT OF PUBLIC UTILI-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I

Industrial Development Policies
INDUSTRIAL LOCATION
Industrial areas in Rochester Hills should maximize the
use of available trunk transportation facilities ( rail and
highway).
These trunk facilities provide the most efficient
and economic access for industrial facilities and siphon off
industrial vehicle trips before they become disruptive to the
residential environment .

PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PARKS
Industrial development should be encouraged in planned
industrial parks wherever possible.
In particular, the Leach
Road area should be planned as an industrial park .

-25-

I

�II

•
•
•

•
•
•
•I
-I

Historic Preseroation Policies
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
The city should actively encourage the preservation of
historic buildings and sites.
An up-to-date survey of
historic buildings and sites in Rochester Hills should be
maintained.
Particular
emphasis
should
be
placed
on
preservation of major historic buildings such as Meadowbrook
Hall, the Sarah Van Hoosen Estate, the Avon Township Hall in
Rochester, and the many historic residences throughout the
city •

I
I
-26-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I

Planning Coordination Policies
PLANNING COORDINATION
The City of Rochester Hills should carefully monitor
long-range master planning and land use and zoning changes in
the surrounding
communities
of
Rochester,
Auburn
Hills,
Oakland Township, Shelby Township, and Troy.
Open lines of
communication should be maintained with both lay and professional planners representing these communities so that any
potential
land
use
or
transportation
conflicts
can be
addressed on a timely basis.
Planning coordination should
include the Rochester Community Schools,
Avondale School
District, and private and parochial schools.
Local planning
should be coordinated with the planning programs of Oakland
County and the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
( SEMCOG) •

I
I
-27-

I

�Natural Features

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-I

Natural Features
This chapter of the master plan is designed: (1) to
identify important natural features which should be taken into
account when planning the overall future land use pattern of
the city: ( 2) to provide the necessary planning rationale to
support the city's adopted wetland and tree protection ordinances:
and
( 3)
to
provide guidance
to potential
land
developers on natural features which may affect the future use
of their properties.
A practical understanding of Rochester Hills' ecological
make-up is necessary in order to develop and apply land use
planning strategies in a comprehensive manner. Just as economic base data, population dynamics, transportation and other
social and cultural information is evaluated, updated and
synthesized into a framework for allocation of land use,
environmental factors must also be studied.
Vegetation cover
inventories, wildlife habitats and ecological processes must
be defined to reflect present conditions and to identify
long-term impact issues.
This understanding can then be
included in the development of planning strategies for the
future management of the full spectrum of the city's land
resources.
Such an ecological analysis is essential to the
process of managing the city's growth .
Previous Master Land Use Plans for Rochester Hills have
included map exhibits and summaries of wetland and woodland
cover.
These documents showed in a broad and simplified format the land cover features that existed within the city years
ago. Vegetation resources were mapped as simply "woodland" or
"wetland."
Actually, these broad categories have many subgroups that need to be identified in order to fully evaluate
land use impacts.
Each subgroup has its own distinct ecological processes and each contributes differently to the
physical and biological character of the city .
Since the production of the 1986 Master Land Use Plan,
the city has implemented local wetland and tree protection
ordinances.
These measures have been established to regulate
the loss or modification of certain remaining natural features
in order to protect the "heal th, safety, and welfare of the
public."
The legal and planning foundation of such policy
lies in the commitment to actively manage surface water
quality, aesthetic values and ecological stability for the
maintenance of "quality of life" within the community.
Knowing that one's surroundings are healthy and ecologically active is important.
This inventory and study of the
city's vegetation features and habitat zones includes a more
detailed assessment of cover type subgroups and provides a
summary of general wildlife diversity factors which serves as
-28-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
•

•I

an indicator of the overall heal th of the community.
This
will assist in the evaluation of development impacts to site
specific as well as city-wide ecosystems and guide the implementation 0£ land use planning in an environmentally sensitive
manner .
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

Rochester Hills is located in the eastern portion of
Oakland County and is geographically described as lying within
the Central Clinton River Watershed.
This is the midpoint of
convergence of the Cl in ton River's primary northern tributaries.
The basic land form classification of the city's
surface features includes recessional and ground moraines left
behind from the retreat of the last glacial period (Wisconsin
Stage of the Pleistocene). Outwash and fluvial terrain formed
the confines of the major stream courses that resulted in the
development of the river valleys and floodplains that make up
the city's present landscape.
Rochester Hills lacks many of the glacial kettle and manmade lakes found in other areas of northern Oakland County .
Instead, it possesses a wide range of riverine (river) aquatic
ecosystems associated with its many creeks and streams. Only
a few palustrine associated aquatic resources exist which are
found in isolated areas.
The landforms and primary ecological processes found in
the city today are largely due to the river's dynamic hydrologic influences.
As a first order regional watercourse, the
Clinton River serves as a collection system for surface runoff
and contributing flows from feeder tributaries such as the
Paint, Stoney, Galloway and Sargent's creeks.
Flooding, collection of sediment and contaminants, ponding and erosional
processes all influence vegetation and biological processes
within the region. With its richly wooded and steeply defined
valley walls, it serves as a broad "niche" linking many secondary natural areas and habitats .
Woodland and other upland resources within the city are
historically characterized as Central Hardwood and Second
Growth forest associations with a variety of successional
prairie areas left over from the post European settlement
agricultural period. Many of these successional prairie areas
were once mature hardwood tracts that were cleared for crop
production because of their relatively flat characteristics
and soil suitability.
The conversion of these mature upland forest areas to
agricultural land uses caused a migration of terrestrial
species to steeper wooded areas and wet-forest zones which are
-29-

�•
•
•
•
•
•I
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I

associated with creek floodplains.
These areas were of little
use to farmers.
The decline of farming in the area resulted
in the transformation of many lands once used for cropland to
series of grairie ecosystems and successional forest edges.
This probably facilitated a brief increase in the amount of
acreage within historical Avon Township that was actively used
by wildlife.
As suburban residential development accelerated in the
late 1960's,
these prairie and new growth forests were
consumed for the same reasons as agriculture-gentle slopes and
good soil.
The loss of habitat of this type caused a second
phase of migration by terrestrial and aviary wildlife to the
remaining woodlots, river valley corridors and pocket marshes.
These remaining undisturbed areas became the only source of
nesting and feeding cover for most species of wildlife.
Concentration of the food chain within small isolated cover zones
combined with the degradation of surface water quality reduced
the overall habitat value within these areas to a level that
could only support a limited number of "tolerant species."
Since the late 1970's, escalation in the demand for the
city's remaining "natural areas" and its proximity to the
expanding economic base in north-central Oakland County has
brought increased development pressure to Rochester Hills.
Residential and corporate construction and infrastructure
improvements, such as utilities and roads, threaten to consume
much of the city I s remaining "remnant ecosystems."
As the
steep, richly wooded sites and those near small water bodies
and marshes are increasingly preferred by buyers, efforts to
develop these areas wi 11 increase.
This may result in a
dramatic reduction in the remaining species diversity and
overall ecological heal th of the area.
This study should
assist Rochester Hills in protecting its natural resources by
serving as a tool for implementing sound land use strategy and
assist the city in coordinating environmental protection
efforts with its neighboring communities .
METHODOLOGY

The maps contained in this section of the Master Land Use
Plan were developed by synthesizing three different types of
information .
Existing base data, aerial photographic records
and field investigations were compiled and compared to arrive
at an up-to-date summary of current vegetation and habitat
zone features within Rochester Hills.
This summary was then
digitally recorded within electronic files for production of a
series of exhibit maps to be included in this section of the
Master Plan.

-30-

�•
•
•
•
•II
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

The process began with the need for a suitable base map
This
of the major road and water features within the city.
base needed to include features identified on the United
States Geolpgical Survey Maps for the area including residential streets and local drainage courses so that they could
serve as a reference for the mapping of small vegetation features.
To satisfy this requirement, the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources computer file system was used.
This base
data system is called the Michigan Resource Information System
or MIRIS.
It contains all of the necessary information needed
to record the schematic locations of various vegetation types.
Additionally, this file system contains previous mapping of
some of the woodland and wetland features of the area which
could be revised and included in the final vegetation cover
maps.
The next step involved the examination of existing aerial
survey information so that the general location of major woodland and wetland features could be identified. If suitable and
accurate aerial records were available, they would provide a
valuable source of information on cover features and allow for
examination of the interrelationships of different types of
vegetation and proposed land use.
For this, color infrared
aerial photographs of Rochester Hills, taken in 1978, were
also
obtained
from
the
Michigan
Department
of
Natural
Resources.
Al though more than ten years old, these photos
record images using a process that shows, in a range of reds,
purples, and whites, the long wave light spectrum that is
emitted by the features of the Earth's surface.
This type of
photograph records different types of vegetation as different textures and shades of "red," which were then traced and
electronically digitized to produce draft maps for use in
field examination .
To correct for changes in land use since 1978, Oakland
County black and white aerial photos, taken in 1989, were
compared
against the color infrared records.
This step
provided for a more accurate mapping of remaining vegetation
features and it incorporated the current development patterns
of the city .
Draft maps were then used in actual field examination to
record small pockets of forested and emergent wetland that
were too small to be distinguished from the aerial photographs.
This step also involved revision of the preliminary
information to reflect a more accurate picture of the city's
land cover resources and their quality.

-31-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-•
•
•
-

The revised and updated information was then digitally
recorded within the map file system to produce the final map
products.
These products include large size full color
computer maps, report size color maps, report size black and
white reproducible maps and large size reproducible mylar maps
for the c i ty's general map file.
Additionally, the final
computer map files containing the vegetation and habitat
information will be incorporated into the Engineering Department's computer file system for use in future development
planning and analysis .
WOODLAND COVER MAP (FIGURE W-I)

Woodlands play an important role in the overall stability
of the city. As a source of shelter, they provide nesting and
breeding opportunities for birds and mammals and serve as
corridors linking other types of habitat.
The various sizes
of trees, understory shrubs and ground cover that make up
woodlands, stabilize slopes, decrease runoff by increasing
infiltration, improve air quality and enrich the soil .
Woodlands are constantly undergoing phases of regeneration and population by various plant types.
As older trees
die, saplings replace them rejuvenating the forest with new
fruit and nut sources which attract wildlife.
The greater the
diversity of plant types within the woodland, the greater its
value as upland habitat.
The Woodland Cover Map identifies primary stands of
mature upland trees that exist with sufficient numbers and
densities to form stands or tracts.
Small, isolated clusters
of
trees occurring
in residential
developments
or road
corridors lack the components to provide diverse habitat
opportunities.
As such, they are not represented within the
map •
LEGEND
Upland Hardwoods

This classification is largely comprised of plants of the
oak-hickory association of the Central Hardwood Forest.
Existing in these areas are white, red, bur and chinquapin oaks, shag bark hickory, butternut and black cherry .
Included in some of the locations are fringe groupings of
sugar maple,
beech,
ironwood,
sassafras, aspen,
and
basswood (not part of the oak-hickory groups) which are
found in areas with higher soil moisture.
Upland Conifers

Upland conifers are evergreen tree species that are found
in stands or bands in upland environments. Species forming this group include white, red, scotch and austrian
pine, northern white cedar, fir, and spruce.
-32-

�w

--------······· •
LEGEND
t WOODLAND COVER
UPLAND HARDWOODS

-

UPLAND CONIFER

W/41//21

•

1000

OPEN WATER

2000

~

....

Figure W-1

WOODLAND COVER MAP
RESOURCE INVENTORY - 1991
ROCHESTER HILLS, MICHIGAN
FOR ftLAflllC PURPOIES ONLY

IOUIICI:
I. IIDUt IJfllffflllDf" '7 MMN. ~
1:ltUIO COU. lffWID J0W. P'ttOftlGINl!ff, ltJI

'"'"'

WO.-... IDMl:E INftltllWIJM STSl'OI

11017M DtMl'MMf t:I !MM. 101J1C1S. 1•

l. 1100H w.n.M. fOlll.lltS ll'01Qlr'I. 1111

MAl , 1111

NHG1

@ COl'IIIIGIII

M1. TODD IIOUOWAI

_=,.~
OMIOHMOOAL

---

PUHHll4C

.........
.............

._..

n5i_i
,.._

�•
•
•
•
•II
""-

WETLAND COVER MAP (FIGURE W-II}

Wetlands are perhaps the most important feature of
Rochester H.i lls' land cover resources.
Because they exist in
locations where water or saturated soils transition to upland
resources,
they serve as
the
link between aquatic and
terrestrial species. This link serves as a critical "ecotone"
where the greatest degree of species interaction and energy
flow occurs which is vital to the formation of a diverse ecosystem.
Wetlands contain the broadest spectrum of plant species
and types of any vegetation cover classification. They can be
comprised of wetforests, wetmeadows , scrub and shrublands,
emergent marsh and submersed aquatic plants.
They are also
the native habitat of more threatened and endangered species
than any other group.
Because of this inherent diversity and
their position within the overall vegetation composition of
the city, they serve as the most important breeding, nesting
and feeding cover for the highest number of birds, mammals,
insects and fish.
The contribution and functional value of wetlands extends
beyond their richness as wildlife habitat. The plant life of
wetlands can improve water quality by absorbing nutrients and
contaminants, reduce storm water velocities, store floodwaters
and recharge ground water supplies.
LEGEND
Shrub, Emergent or Aquatic Bed, Wetmeadow

This classification describes those wetland plant communities that are most eas·ily identified by the average
person as a bog or marsh.
The three subgroup names refer
to three different types of wetland vegetation that
typically exist in close proximity to water. Aquatic bed
wetlands are made up of plants such as lily pads,
pondweeds, and milfoil that grow in the shallow depths of
permanent water bodies.
Emergent vegetation is found in
the shallowest locations and ranges into the transition
of saturated soils that extends onto drier ground. This
group includes cattails, rushes, goldenrod, aster, and
sedges.
Shrub wetlands are those areas dominated by
brush and woody vegetation that includes witchhazel,
scrub willow, alder, and red-osier dogwood.

-34-

�w

,

•••••• , ••••••• •
LEGEND
1. WETLAND COVER
LOWLAND HARDWOOD
LOWLAND CONIFER
SHRUB, EMERGENT OR
AQUATIC BED, WETMEADOW
OPEN WATER

1000

lOOO

J

:::s

1000

Figure W-II

WETLAND COVER MAP
RESOURCE INVENTORY - 1991
ROCHESTER HILLS, MICHIGAN
FOA PlUNING PURPOaEI Oltl Y

80URC(

...

I \ID$H llf'#f8l()« t, M'II.M. EWIX'S

,

U4000CCILIN'WUIIOIW.fflOl'OrolWffl.lt71

IIDCiM'JIOO.KIIRWiUD!Sl'Sl'Dt

lillOCNII DEPlllnlrol)ff 'X" tW\M. !BlA:B,. ltlt

l.

lfQIDIH

IMf\lML fOl&amp;.IC INUMa'r. l"1

l&amp;At, 1111

..~ ,

© COPYAIOHT 111l

TODO HOUOWAT

~:fow~

-[IN'IK&gt;NMOOAL

--- ...
·---Pl,i,NNIHC

,,.,,_

'"""""""',.

,_
,...

�•
•
•
"II
•
--~
-

Lowland Hardwood

Lowland hardwoods are characterized by mature deciduous
wetfo :t est tree species which occur in floodplains and
seasonally saturated depressions.
Members of this group
include green ash, red and silver maple, cottonwood,
basswood, black willow, swamp white oak, and hornbeam.
Lowland Conifer

Stands of wetforest evergreen trees species define this
cover type.
This group is mainly comprised of red cedar
and tamarack.
Open Water

Open water includes surface water features such as ponds,
lakes, rivers, creeks, and drains.
HABITAT SENSITIVITY MAP (FIGURE W-III)

The distribution of wildlife within Rochester Hills
covers many parts of the city.
Unfortunately, this distribution includes only a few sizeable habitat "niches" that
provide a sheltered and diverse environment that can support a
range of species interacting with one another on a number of
levels.
Due to the pattern of development and the loss of
vast areas of vegetation resources, these niches occur where
the remaining plant and animal communities have stabi 1 i zed
within a ecological order driven by the three basic elements
of access to food, water, and shelter.
These areas are defined by the interrelationship between
vegetation that provides food and shelter, and streams and
ponds that provide water and food.
In identifying habitat
zones, an examination of wetland and woodland vegetation was
conducted which compared these features to water bodies.
Wildlife use of an area cannot be predicted without an
understanding of this relationship.
This habitat inventory
does
not
attempt
to map specific wildlife populations.
Instead, it identifies suitable habitats within the city where
the basic needs for food, water, and shelter are satisfied.
The map reflects the quality of these zones based on
their forming a "system" with the potential to support a
variety of species and ecological processes.
The limiting
factor for these sys terns is the availability of open water.
Initial identification of habitat zones focused on those areas
where two or more vegetation resources, either woodland or
wetland, interfaced directly with open water. These locations
establish critical "ecotones" that create breeding, nesting

-36-

�,.

...... ,...,.11•• -·

•
LEGEND

HABIT AT ZONES
HIGHLY SENSITIVE HABITAT ZONE
-

-

R

- -

IIODERA TEL Y SENSITIVE HABITAT ZONE

I

IIARGINALL y SENSITIVE HABITAT ZONE

I

W"~

•

1000

OPEN WATER

....

)

....

Figure W-111

HABITAT SENSITIVITY MAP
RESOURCE INVENTORY - 1991
ROCHESTER HILLS, MICHIGAN
FOR ,uJOING PIIIPOOU OIU

IOUIICE
~0-~

LI.

~LllFMI\IH' rT•UK.l!!Oll:ES
1:MO:ID0:UatfNP&gt;iJOllrlPttOfOCM"M'l'. lti'I
IC&gt;«.w llf!DJIC[.,,,.,. smDI
ll«)Of( OB'MIOf r, MU1M,_ ll;DR:t5.. ,. .

l. 1CHD1H MlJ\1111,l IUA.aB NJDJ, ttU

MAY, 1111

tt'l-001

(f) COl'Y- 1111. TOGO HOUOWAT

-[MOHM(tflM.

---

PUHNIHC

.,.._

. . . . . . CDl"lla.11111:

·-...::;::
-

�•
-II
•II
II

"-,
,
-

and feeding opportunities for a
aviary, and amphibious species.

vast

array

of

terrestrial,

The
minimum size
for
a
zone
varies based on the
"richness" and complexity of this interface and on adjacent
land use influences.
In general, the minimum size criteria
may be defined as an area that contains open water and a plant
community of functional size with a shelter belt of either
steep topography, mature for est or open land.
The shelter
belt is a physical trait that serves as a buffer from dominant
human intervention and disturbance to the zone's inherent
ecological relationships or ecology.
A habitat zone may also
be adjacent to another zone of a lesser or higher value.
Other small
isolated pockets of habitat certainly exist
throughout Rochester Hills, but these locations lack the
components and interrelationships necessary to facilitate a
complex site ecology.
These small locations do not appear on
the Habitat Sensitivity Map for this reason.
Three different ratings are assigned to the habitat zones
which identify them as either "Highly Sensitive, Moderately
Sensitive, or Marginally Sensitive."
This system places a
quality factor on each habitat zone which is a combination of
the diversity of the habitat features within the zone and
includes the zone's susceptibility to degradation as a result
of development influences such as storm water contamination,
clearing and foot traffic.
Hence, the higher the value for a
given zone, the greater its role in the overall ecological
make-up of the city.
Highly Sensitive Habitat Zone
These areas contain the richest relationships of water
and plant cover features and afford wildlife the greatest
protection from disturbance.
These areas provide the
highest degree of habitat opportunity and serve as the
foundation for species existence within their surrounding
areas.
Because of their richness and potential for
utilization of the largest number of species, they are
Highly Sensitive.
Moderately Sensitive Habitat Zone
These zones are characterized by a lesser degree of plant
cover diversity or are served by water features that are
smaller than the Highly Sensitive Zones.
As a result,
their potential to serve a diverse range of wildlife
species is somewhat limited.
They do provide certain
special habitat functions such as serving as isolated
niches for specific wildlife communities.

-38-

�II
II

•
•
"
"

Many of these areas abut one or more High Sensitive
Zones.
In doing so, they serve as secondary support
habitats for many of the species which are found in areas
which are more sensitive and more di verse.
Because of
their lesser role in the city's biological diversity and
their reduced plan make up, they are Moderately Sensitive.
Marginally Sensitive Habitat Zone
Environments that contain features such as open-range
land, golf course fairways, steep topography or plant
community-to
surface
water
relationships
that
lack
diversity define these zones.
In general, they serve as
corridors that link higher value habitats and function as
natural buffers that support Highly Sensitive and Moderately Sensitive Zones.
PRIMARY HABITAT ZONES

The following list contains a summary
habitat features for each of the seventeen
identified on the Habitat Sensitivity Map:

of the
habitat

major
zones

Area

l.

Western Clinton River Valley:
Largest and most diverse system, centered on major
regional water course.
Elements include river,
marsh, standing water, lowland shrub and aquatic bed
food
and
cover
sources,
upland
and
lowland
hardwoods.
This zone functions as a major corridor
for wildlife.

Area

2.

Oakland
Second
Di verse
aquatic

Area

3.

Central Paint Creek Watershed:
Primary "cold water fishery" and upland corridor
system of local impact.
Third largest.
Elements
include stream aquatic bed, standing water, lowland
conifer and shrub cover, meadow food sources, mature
upland f crest.
Water qua! i ty values good to the
mouth of Sargents Creek.

Area

4.

Central Stoney Creek Valley/Winkler Pond:
Fourth largest system, centered around Stoney Creek
corridor.
Elements include stream aquatic bed,
marshland, upland and lowland conifer, and upland
hardwoods.
This zone has steeply defined valley
walls and serves as a corridor between Winkler Pond
and other habitats.

University/Golf Course:
largest system, centered on Galloway Creek.
mix of lower order water bodies, shrub and
bed food sources and upland hardwoods.

-39-

�•
Area

5.

•II

Bloomer Park:
Part of a major parkland resource.
It includes
prairies, shrublands, mature wooded valley slopes,
and a perched pocket open water marsh ecosystem.
This system serves important support resource values
to the Clinton River corridor.

Area

6.

Ill

East Clinton River Valley:
A short segment within the City of Rochester that
contains river aqua ti cs, permanent standing water,
emergent marsh, lowland shrub edges, upland conifers
and hardwoods, and lowland forest.

Area

7.

Pine Trace/Sprague Drain:
Primarily a lowland forest environment.
Elements
include standing water, marsh and lowland harwoods.

Area

8.

Honeywell Ditch:
Primarily a lowland forest environment.
Elements
include creek bed, lowland conifer, lowland hardwood
and upland hardwood.

Area

9.

Rochester/Orion Road:
A lowland hardwood and seasonally flooded swamp
ecosystem containing pocket marshes and creek flow
corridor functions.

Area 10.

Sheldon Road:
Primarily
a
shrubland
and
wetmeadow
corridor.
Elements include lesser order creek aquatic, marsh,
and lowland.

Area 11.

(unnamed)
Narrow upland forest corridor contiguous to Paint
Creek.
Elements include upland hardwood, standing
water, and lowland hardwood.

Area 12.

Sargent's Crossing:
Lowland stream corridor associated with Sargent's
Creek.
Elements include creek bed aquatic, marsh,
lowland shrub, and upland hardwood.

Area 13.

Dutton Ditch:
Primarily a lowland forest corridor.
Elements
include lowland hardwood, creek bed aquatic, marsh,
and standing water.

Area 14.

Upper Sargent's Creek:
Primarily an upland forest with lesser order creek
flow.
Elements include mature upland hardwood and
creek bed aquatics.

II

"--

-40-

�•
•
•
•
•Ill
"-

Area 15.

(unnamed)
Isclated lowland shrub wetland and emergent marsh
with mature fringe understory plants and seasonal
standing water.

Area 16.

(unnamed)
Isolated lowland forest, marsh and mature fringe
understory with seasonal saturation and standing
water .

Area 17.

(unnamed)
Isolated lowland forest and emergent marsh.

DEFINITIONS

Diversity:
Ecological diversity is simply described as
the number of different species and interrelationships
that exist within a given area.
Ecosystem:
A community of living things interacting and
dependent
on
one
another
and
with
their
physical
environment.
An ecosystem is any area with a boundary
through which an input of energy and matter can be
measured and
related
to one or more environmental
factors.
Ecotone:
The interface between different ecosystems or
the edge that is defined by rapid changes in species communities and associations.
Floodplain:
The area inundated by water flows within
river basins that exceed normal bank elevations to an
average high water level as a result of major rain events
and cause a reformation of soil and vegetation conditions.
Habitat:
The place where an organism, plant, or animal
normally lives and reproduces.
Natural Community:
A population of plants and animals
living and interacting in a given locality.
Wetland:
Land characterized by the presence of water at
a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that
under
normal
circumstances
does
support,
wetland
vegetation or aquatic life and is commonly referred to as
a bog, swamp, or marsh.

-41-

�II
II

•
-

Wetland Vegetation:
Plants that exhibit adaptations to
allow,
under
normal
conditions,
germination
and
propagqtion and to allow growth with at least their root
systems in water or saturated soil.
Included in this
definition
are
vegetation
groupings
of
wetmeadows,
wetforests, and wet-shrublands.
Woodland:
A cluster or grouping of mature or second
growth tree species forming a woodlot, stand, or forest.
The area must allow for the regeneration of normal
succession of forest tree populations.

-42-

�Population arul
Housing

�I
Population and Housing

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

,,
I
I
I

The City of Rochester Hills has experienced a rapid
increase in population and number of households during the
1980's. The 1990 U.S. Census enumerated 61,766 people in the
City of Rochester Hills. This represents an increase of more
than 51 percent from the 1980 population count of 40,779.
The number of households increased by 62 percent, from 14,598
in 1980 to 22,353 in 1990.
The majority of this growth
occurred in the latter part of the decade, between 1986 and
1990.
POPULATION TRENDS

Looking back at historic trends, Rochester Hills ( previously Avon Township) has been growing rapidly since 1940,
with at least a 50 percent increase in each ten year period.
Oakland County experienced similar growth levels during the
1940 to 1960 period, but has leveled off and grew only 7
percent in the 1980 to 1990 decade. Table PH-1, Table PH-2,
and Figure PH-I exhibit population trends in greater detail.
Rochester Hills has also grown at a more rapid pace in recent
years than any of its immediate neighbors.
Troy, to the
south, experienced very rapid growth up to 1980, as did
Oakland Township to the north.
Most of Troy is now
developed, while land use policies are responsible for
slowing the natural growth rate in Oakland Township.
The
City of Rochester
is almost completely developed;
its
population remained almost constant over the past decade.
Auburn Hills (to the west) and Shelby Township (to the east)
experienced modest increases.
The Southeast Michigan Council of Governments ( SEMCOG)
has developed forecasts for the twenty year period to the
year 2010 (See Table PH-3).
TABLE PH-3

I

POPULATION PROJECTIONS
FOR THE CITY OF ROCHESTER HILLS

I

Year

Projected
Population

I

1995
2000
2005
2010

64,581
67,355
70,128
72,902
Capacity

-43-

I

79,522

�.. .... - .. - - - • - - - - - - --~ ,

1111

~

TABLE PH-I
POPULATION COUNTS

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

Michigan

5,256,106

5,371,766

7,823,194

8,881,826

9,258,344

9,295,297

Detroit

1,623,~52

1,849,568

1,670,144

1,514,063

1,203,339

1,027,984

Tri-County Area

2,377,329

3,016,197

3,762,360

4,204,443

4,043,633

3,912,679

254,068

396,001

690,259

907,871

1,011,793

J ,083,592

ROCHESTER HILLS

5,017

8,903

15,945

24,513

40,779

61,766

Rochester
Auburn Hills
Shelby Township
Oakland Township
Troy

3,759
3,465
2,946
966
6,248

4,279
6,210
5,930
1,343
10,087

5,431
8,959
17,114
2,469
19,402

7,054
12,646
29,467
4,793
39,419

7,203
15,388
38,939
7,628
67,102

7,130
17,076
48,655
8,227
72,884

1980-1990

SEMCOG
Forecast
1990-2010

Oakland County

I

~
~

TABLE PH-2
PERCENTAGE OF GROWTH IN POPULATION

I

1940-1950

1950-1960

Actual
1960-1970

-

1970-1980

Michigan

2.2

45.6

13.5

4.2

0.4

n.a.

Detroit

13.9

-9.7

-9.3

-20.5

-14.6

-19 . 1

Tri-County Area

26.9

24.7

11.8

-3.8

-3.2

3.3

Oakland County

55.9

74.3

31.5

11.4

7.1

16.6

ROCHESTER HILLS

77. 5

79.1

53.7

66.4

51.5

18.0

Rochester
Auburn Hills
Shelby Township
Oakland Township
Troy

13.8
79.2
101.3
39.0
61.4

26.9
44.3
188.6
83.8
92 . 3

29.9
41.2
72.2
94.l
103.2

2.1
21.7
32.1
59.1
70.2

-1.0
11.0
25.0
7. 9
8.6

1.6
47.1
35.1
66 . 3
23 . 7

�I

-sv-

:.,,

I

.....&amp;..

I

§~

I'\.)
C)

( C)

C)

I'\.)
C)

~
C)

O')

(X)

C)

C)

C)
C)

'O
'O
~

("')
~

;::

~
;,.

ROCHESTER. HILLS

:::,..

..._,

Auburn Hills

C;:,

Towtship

:::,.
;,.

5
~-

Michigan

g

;,;

~

0

-c

=
~

-·=
~

0

~-::,

Detroit

L...-~

ROCHESTER. HILLS

~

Auburn Hi II s

~

,

Oakland TO\l,TlShip

I

""""

Detro i t ,_____

ROCHESTER HILLS

~

.,

Auburn Hills

~

__...,.
Oakland TO\\nShip

~
~

=
~

~
(JQ

Detroit

ROCHESTER HILLS
Auburn Hills

~

Oakland Tomship

Cl
.,
0

~
~

.

Detroit ....__ _ _-l

ROCHESTER HILLS

=-

burn Hills
land T0W1ship
Detroit

en
tI'.1
~~~
.n(i
'Tj
\0 0

N~O
o~

0

ROCHESTER HILLS
Auburn Hills
Oakland Tomship

C1

I

�I

I·
I
I
I

I
I
I

-I
I
I

-

Rochester Hills' growth rate is expected to decline to a
more modest 18 percent as the amount of land available for
residential , development shrinks.
Auburn Hills and Shelby
Townships, with more available developable land, will grow at
more rapid rates, while the City of Rochester will remain at
its current population level.
Oakland Township is forecast
to grow by 66 percent, to about 15,000 population, over the
next twenty years.
AGE DISTRIBUTION

Rochester Hills' population growth is concentrated among
adults, rather than children.
During the decade of the
1970's, population in the age groups under age 25 increased
at only half the rate for the city as a whole, while
explosive population growth was observed in the adult age
groups, over age 25.
Table PH-4 and Figure PH-II indicate
age distribution trends in greater detail.
TABLE PH-4
TRENDS IN AGE DISTRIBUTION

Under 5
5-17
18-24
25-44
45-64
65+

1970

1980

1990

2,011
7,790
3,372
6,016
4,291
1,033

2,720
9,719
4,527
12,893
8,347
2,573

4,447
11,863
5,122
22,459
12,528
5,347

35.3%
24.8%
34.3%
114.3%
94.5%
149.1%

63.5%
22.1%
13.1%
74.2%
50.1%
107.8%

24,513

40,779

61,766

66.4%

51.5%

1970-1980

1980-1990

The 1980's brought greater growth in the number of young
families, while the baby "boomlet" produced a large increase
in the number of children aged zero to four.
The baby
boomlet, as it is known,
represents the phenomenon of
children being born to the baby boomer generation. The baby
boomers were born between 1946 and 1964; they were at the
prime child-bearing ages (25 to 40) in the late 1980's.
While these young people will, generally, have fewer children
than their parents did, there are so many of them having one
or two children that a "boomlet" results.
These young parents, having the boomlet babies, are also
at a prime age for buying homes.
Thus, their age group ( 25

-46-

�...... -...,,__, ................. .. ..

....

Figure PH-II

Trends in age Distribution

25000

65+

20000

m=t?'~Wz'M

45-64

-25-44

15000
I

,t::&gt;
-..J

I

10000
5000

~

18-24

-

5-17
&lt;5

0

1970
Source: 1990 Census - APB Associates

1980

1990

�I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

•I

I
I
I
I

I

to 44) increased by 74 percent in Rochester Hills, · ahead of
the 51 percent increase for the city overall.
On the other
growth
rates
were
lower
for
persons
aged
5 to 24, a
hand,
which
'includes
the
baby
"bust"--the
low
birth rate
group
years of the early 1970's.
Overal 1, as of 1990, 26. 4 percent of Rochester Hills' population was children under 18 years of age.
The figure for
the state as a whole is comparable.
However, only 8.7
percent
of
the
city's
population
was
65
and
older,
considerably under the 11.9 percent for Michigan and 10.9 for
Oakland County.
Rochester Hills attracts households in the
prime adult years (25 to 64), both with and without children.
OTHER POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS

Race and Hispanic Origin.
Overall, 95 percent of Rochester
Hills' 1990 population was white.
Asian and Pacific Islanders represented 3.2 percent, followed by black (1.4%),
American Indian (.2%), and other race (.3%). Hispanics, who
may be of any race, constituted 1 .4% of the 1990 Rochester
Hills population.
Almost everyone in Rochester
Group Q.uarters Population.
Hills was living in a housing unit in 1990. Only 773 people
(1.3%) were enumerated in group quarters such as nursing
homes.
Household Composition.
Over two-thirds ( 67%) of Rochester
Hills households were headed by married couples in 1990 (See
Table PH-5).
In contrast, the statewide figure is only 55%.
Most of the remaining households had only one person living
in them.
Very few are headed by a single parent with
children.
TABLE PH-5
HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION

Household Type

Number

Married Couple
15,053
Other family (two or more
people related to each
other)
2,016
One person living alone
4,366
Other non-family group
918
Total

22,353

-48-

Percent
67%
9%
20%
4%
100%

�I

I
I
I
I
I

-I
•I
I
I
I

-I

Population Per Household.
The average number of persons per
households in 1990 was 2. 7 3.
This represents a decline of 7
percent from the 1980 figure of 2. 94 persons per household.
The decline was expected, in view of the increased number of
households without children and the fact that completed
fertility rates are much lower than in previous generations.
Completed fertility is the number of children a woman has, or
will have, in her lifetime.
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

Rochester Hills had 23,535 housing units at the time of
the 1990 U.S. Census (See Table PH-6). Of these, 22,353 were
occupied and 1,182 were vacant, for a vacancy rate of 5
percent. Many of the units recorded as vacant, however, were
newly constructed and awaiting their first occupants.
The
total housing stock grew by 61 percent between 1980 and 1990;
the number of occupied units, or households, grew by 62 percent.
TABLE PH-6
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

1980

Number
1990

Percent
1980
1990

Percent
Chan9e

TOTAL HOUSING UNITS

14,598

23,535

100

100

54

OCCUPANCY STATUS
Occupied
Vacant

13,761
837

22,353
1,182

94
6

95
5

62
33

TENURE
Owner-occupied
Renter-occupied

10,970
2,791

17,363
4,990

80
20

78
22

58
79

9,653
1,158
638
1,511
698
940

14,813
2,360
560
2,201
2,117
1,484

66
8
4
11
5
6

63
10
3
9
9
6

53
104
-12
46
203
58

UNITS IN STRUCTURE
Single-family
Row house
Two to four
Five to nine
Ten or more
Mobile home
MEDIAN HOUSING
VALUE
MEDIAN CONTRACT RENT

$61,300 $137,900
$300

$566

-49-

125
88

�I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

II
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

Like most Detroit area suburbs, Rochester Hills is a
city of hom~owners:
four out of five households own their
living quarters.
However, rental housing increased as a
percentage of the total housing stock during the 1980's, and
had a larger growth rate (79 percent as compared to 58
percent for owner-occupied units).
Looking at the data for uni ts in structure clarifies
this trend.
Two categories of housing had very high growth
rates during the decade:
row houses ( one unit attached)
doubled, and apartment uni ts in bui !dings with ten or more
uni ts tripled ( See Table PH-6) .
Single-family homes, while
still
comprising nearly two-thirds
of Rochester
Hills'
housing stock, increased in number at a much slower rate.
Housing values increased dramatically during the decade.
The median value of single-family homes, as estimated by
their occupants, increased by 125 percent, from $61,300 in
1980 to $137,900 in 1990.
In comparison, the Michigan statewide median value is only $60,600; Oakland County's figure is
$95,400.
Rental levels also increased substantially,
from a
median of $300 in 1980 to $566 in 1990.
However, only one
renter in six paid more than $750 per month.
The median rent
figure for Oakland County is $495; for Michigan, only $343.
SUMMARY

Rochester Hills is an affluent community of homeowners.
It has experienced high growth rates in recent years and very
substantial increases in housing value.
About average in the
proportion of the population that is children, the community
has a lower than average proportion of senior citizens.
Most
households are either headed by married couples or persons
living alone.
The single-family home
but many apartment and row
recent years.
Housing value
than the average for Oakland

is the predominant housing type,
house uni ts have been built in
and rent are considerably higher
County as a whole.

-50-

�I

Econom.ic Ana{yses

�I
Economic Analyses

I

'I
I

I
I

•I
I
I
I
I
I

PROJECTION OF FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NEEDS

Rochester Hills does not exist as a separate urban
center, but is actually
part of a large concentration of
suburban communities forming the Oakland County retail trade
area.
Some
types
of
commercial
development will draw
customers just from Rochester Hills, while other shopping
facilities will draw from all of Oakland County or even a
large part of the entire Detroit Metropolitan Area.
For
example, a neighborhood convenience shopping center containing a supermarket will normally draw customers from a one
to two mile trade area.
A community shopping center will
draw customers from a three to five mile distance.
A major
regional shopping mall can draw customers from eight or more
miles away if there are good expressway connections.
Development of major shopping facilities in neighboring
communities could have an important impact on any projection
of commercial space demand in Rochester Hills.
For example,
construction of a large,
regional shopping mall in an
adjoining suburb or intensification of retail facilities in
Downtown Rochester could significantly reduce the demand for
retail space within the City of Rochester Hills.
The concept of projecting future commercial development
needs based on a community's population characteristics when
fully built up is well accepted in the literature of city
planning.
The analysis also provides interim commercial
development land projections for the years 1995, 2000, 2010
as well as for maximum capacity at total community build out.
Most communities in Oakland County pursue, permit, or
reject commercial developments based on their own local
preferences and advantages.
It would be rare for one community to turn down a commercial development because it would
negatively affect another shopping area in an adjoining city.
Therefore, each city must very carefully assess its own
commercial development potential within the broader trade
area so that it does not end up with abandoned and boarded up
shopping facilities due to overbuilding or stronger outside
competition.
The conclusion of this ana.lysis contains certain cautions on the amount of further commercial development
which Rochester Hills can realistically expect to absorb and
permanently support in a viable manner.

-51-

I

�I
MARKET ANALYSIS

I

I
I
I
I
I

•I
I
I
I
I
I

The market analysis provides information on supportable commercial acreage for 1990, as well as projections for
1995, 2000, 2010, and full capacity build up.
An important factor in a market analysis is the number
of households.
This figure is multiplied by an average
household income figure to determine the spending potential
for Rochester Hills. These calculations eventually determine
the appropriate commercial needs of the city.
The 1990 U.S. Census of Population indicates that the
current number of households is 23,487. The number of households in Rochester Hills is expected to increase from 23,487
in 1990 to 30,900 in 2010.
Based on previous planning
studies done by the city, the number of households when the
city is totally built-up will be approximately 31,809.
The
household size is predicted to decrease from 2.78 persons per
household in 1990 to 2.5 persons per household in 2010.
The
forecast, at five year intervals, is shown in Table E-1.
Another important factor of the market analysis is the
level of household income.
This figure is multiplied by the
number of households and determines the buying power the
total community wi 11 have for goods and services.
The 1990
average household income is estimated to be $48,444.
Disposable income can now be calculated from the total
household income.
The total income is distributed between
taxes, housing costs, insurance, medical and other services,
and tangible goods.
Disposable income is the percentage of
total income that is available for tangible goods such as
food, clothes, automobile costs, and other real i terns.
For
Rochester Hills, the disposable income used for retail sales
is estimated to be fifty-four percent ( 54%) of the total
household income.
The projected number of households and the
disposable income per household are indicated in Table E-2.
These two (2) figures are multiplied to attain the net
disposable income for Rochester Hills until the year 2010.
The disposable income per household is next distributed
among consumer expenditure categories by percentages.
These
percentages portray how a Rochester Hills household will
spend its income.
A listing of the ten (10) consumer
expenditure categories used and their accompanying explanation of uses are set forth below:
l) GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES includes the following estab1 ishments:
department stores, variety stores, general
merchandise stores, dry good stores, sewing and needlework stores.
-52-

I

�I

I

TABLE E-1

POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS

I
I
I

CITY OF ROCHESTER. HILLS

r

J

I

•
I
I

I
I
t

YEAR

PERSONS PER
HOUSEHOLDS (ADJUSTED)

61,807

2.78

23,487*

1995

64,581

2 . 70

25,342

2000

67,355

2.63

27,192

2005

70,128

2 . 56

29,041

2010

72,902

2.50

30,900

CAPACITY

79,522

2.50

31,809

*This table indicates the number of households in the city as 23,487; while
the Population and Housing chapter of the master plan indicates the city has
23,535 households.
This difference of 48 households is due to a minor
increase in the household figure by the U.S. Census Bureau between the time
the two chapters were prepared.

1990 U.S. Census of Population,
1990 SEMCOG Regional Development Forecast,
Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

-53-

I

HOUSEHOLDS

1990

Sources:

t

POPULATION
PROJECTIONS

�TABLE E-2
NET DISPOSABLE INCOME
CITY OF ROCHESTER. HILLS

t

•

TOTAL INCOME
PER HOUSEHOLD
(In 1990 Dollars)

(54% OF TOTAL INCOME)
NET INCOME
(In 1990 Dollars)

YEAR

HOUSEHOLDS

1990

23,487

$48,444

$26,160

1995

25,342

$48,444

$26,160

2000

27,192

$48,444

$26,160

2005

29,041

$48,444

$26,160

2010

30,900

$48,444

$26,160

Sources:

1990 U.S. Census of Population,
SEMCOG 1990 Regional Development Forecast,
Howard L. Green and Associates, Incorporated,
Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

-54-

�2) APPAREL
AND
ACCESSORY
SALES
includes
establishments
primarily selling clothing of all kinds and related
articles fpr personal wear and adornment.
3) FURNITURE, FURNISHINGS, AND EQUIPMENT SALES are establishments primarily selling merchandise used for furnishing the home (furniture, floor coverings, draperies,
glass and chinaware, refrigerators, household appliances,
radio and television sets).
4) OTHER COMPARISON SALES include the multitude of retail
establishments that are too small to categorize indi vidually.
5) FOOD STORES primarily sell food for home preparation and
consumption.
6) DRUGS AND PROPRIETARY STORES fill and sell prescriptions,
proprietary drugs, patent medicines, and other health and
first-aid products.
7) EATING AND DRINKING PLACES principally sell prepared
foods and drinks for consumption on or near the premises.
8) AUTOMOTIVE SALES include businesses selling new and used
automobiles,
new parts and accessories,
motorcycles,
mopeds, aircraft, boats, and recreation vehicles.
9) GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS primarily retail gasoline and
automotive lubricants.
They may also sell batteries,
accessories, and perform repairs.
10) HARDWARE, LUMBER, AND GARDEN SUPPLY establishments primarily sell lumber and other building materials, paint,
glass and wallpaper, hardware, nursery stock, lawn and
garden supplies, and mobile homes.
The percent of total disposable income and the estimated
retail sales per household for the current and projected
years are indicated in Table E-3. A similar spending pattern
throughout the projection period is assumed.
To derive the supportable retail space for the appropriate year, the retail spending figures indicated in Table E-3
are multiplied by the expected number of households to
determine the total retail sales for the city. Total retail
sales is converted into supportable building square footage
by dividing the dollar amount per square foot per category
into the total sales figure.
The Urban Land Institute has
prepared a table of expected sales per square foot for
various types of land use.
Table E-4 indicates the sales per
-55-

�.,

W//1

•

TABLE E-3
RETAIL SALES PER HOUSEHOLD
CITY OF ROCHESTER. HILLS

COMMERCIAL CATEGORY

PERCENT OF TOTAL
DISPOSABLE INCOME

ESTIMATED RETAIL SALES PER HOUSEHOLD
(In 1990 Dollars)

COMPARISON:
General Merchandise
Apparel &amp; Accessary
Furniture, Furnishings, &amp;
Equipment
Other Comparison
TOTAL COMPARISON

13.3%
5.0%

$ 3,479
1,308

5.7%
12.5%

1,491
3,270

36.5%

$ 9,548

20.8%
3.1%
9.2%

$ 5,441

33. 1%

$ 8,659

17.1%
8.7%
4.6%

$ 4,473
2,276
_l_,204

30.4%

$ 7,953

100.0%

$26,160

I
Ln
O'I

I

CONVENIENCE:
Food Stores
Drugs &amp; Proprietary
Eating &amp; Drinking Places
TOTAL CONVENIENCE

811

2,407

GENERAL COMMERCIAL:
Automotive
Gasoline Service Station
Hardware, Lumber, &amp; Garden
TOTAL GENERAL
TOTAL RETAIL SALES
Sources:

Howard L. Green and Associates, Incorporated,
Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

�TABLE E-4
1990 ANTICIPATED AVERAGE SALES
PER. SQUARE FOOT

(Gross Leasable Area)

CITY OF ROCHESTER. HILLS

COMMERCIAL CATEGORY

SALES PER SQUARE FOOT

COMPARISON:
General Merchandise
Apparel &amp; Accessary
Furniture, Furnishings, &amp;
Equipment
Other Comparison

$117

202
184
154

CONVENIENCE:
Food
Drugs &amp; Proprietary
Eating and Drinking Places

288
172

131

GENERAL COMMERCIAL:
Automotive
Gas Service Station
Hardware, Lumber, &amp; Garden

Sources:

128
121
111

URBAN LAND INSTITUTE, Dollar and Cents for Shopping Centers: 1990
Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

-57-

�•
•
"I
•
•
•
-I
I
I

'I
'-

square foot figures used. Tables E-5, E-6, E-7, and E-8 show
the expected supportable building area in square feet for the
years 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2010 respectively .
Supportable
building
area
in
square
feet
is now
converted into land acreage needed for retail operations.
Conversion of the supportable square footage into acres will
facilitate an easier comparison to property sizes needed for
commercial development. A generally-accepted standard indicates that for each square foot of building, three (3)
additional square feet of parking, loading space, greenbelts,
and setbacks will be required.
This standard has been
checked against the Rochester Hills zoning ordinance and
landscape regulations and found to be accurate for use in the
city.
Thus,
the
acreage
is
calculated by multiplying
supportable building area by four (4) and then dividing by
43,560 (the number of square feet in one acre). The results
are indicated in Table E-9.
The purpose of this market analysis is to determine the
commercial requirements of the future population of Rochester
Hills.
As shown in Table E-9, the supportable commercial
land area for 1990 is 371.2 acres.
This acreage number
represents the land that can be supported for commercial uses
for Rochester Hills residents based upon their income and
spending patterns.
The short-range projection to 1995 portrays a need of 400. 5 acres for commercial development. A
middle-range
projection
to
the
year
2000
indicates
a
commercial need of 429.8 acres.
The long-range projection to
2010 shows a commercial demand of 488.4 acres.
Figures for Rochester Hills at capacity development can
be attained by utilizing this same market analysis process.
The 1986 Master Plan reports the holding capacity of the city
to be 32,501 households.
We have adjusted this figure to
31,809 based on park land acquisition the city has carried
out since the 1986 plan was completed . The supportable total
commercial acreage can be determined by using the capacity
household figure stated, and performing the many calculations
involved.
To preclude the duplication of the many tables
previously listed, a summary table showing the number of
supportable acres at total build-out is set forth in Table
E-10.
The purpose of the foregoing analysis was to determine
the amount of commercial development space which Rochester
Hills' own population could support.
The analysis indicated
that the City of Rochester Hills could support 371.2 acres of
commercial space by the year 1990.
However, the city
currently has 504 acres of commercially developed land;
therefore, the city now has 132. 8 acres of commercial land
developed in excess of what its own population could support
in the year 1990.
This indicates that the city's commercial
developments are serving a population beyond its own municipal boundaries.
-58-

�:a ;· w·•-,···· •:ca• •
TABLE E-5

1990 EXPECTED SPEND!~ POTENTIAL AND
SUPPORTALE BUILDING AR.EA

(NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS - 23,487)

COMMERCIAL CATEGORY

SPENDING POTENTIAL (In 1990 Dollars)
PER HOUSEHOLD
TOTAL SALES

COMPARISON:
General Merchandise
Apparel &amp; Accessary
Furniture, Furnishings &amp;
Equipment
Other Comparison

$ 3,479

SUPPORTABLE
BUILDING AREA
(S_QUARE FEET)

.

1,308

81,711,273
30,720,996

698,387
152,084

1,491
3,270

35,019,117
76,802,490

190,321
498,717

$ 9,548

$224,253,876

1,539,509

$ 5,441
811
2,407

$127,792,767
19,047,957
56i~3L209

443,725
110,744
431,551

$ 8,659

$203,373,933

986,020

$ 4,473
2,276
1,204

$105,057,351
53,456,412
28,278,348

820,760
441,788
254,760

TOTAL GENERAL

$ 7,953

$186,792,111

1,517,308

TOTAL RETAIL SALES

$261160

$614,419!920

4,042,837

TOTAL COMPARISON

$

I
U1
~

I

CONVENIENCE:
Food Stores
Drugs &amp; Proprietary
Eating &amp; Drinking Places
TOTAL CONVENIENCE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL:
Automotive
Gasoline Service Station
Hardware, Lumber, and Garden

Source:

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

�aw

--{- •••••a•
TABLE E-6

1995 EXPECTED SPENDING POTENTIAL AND
SOPPORTALE BUILDING AR.EA

(NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS - 25,342)
SPENDING POTENTIAL (In 1990 Dollars)
PER HOUSEHOLD
TOTAL SALES

COMMERCIAL CATEGORY

SUPPORTABLE
BUILDING AREA
(SQUARE FEET)

COMPARISON:
General Merchandise
Apparel &amp; Accessary
Furniture, Furnishings &amp;
Equipment
Other Comparison

$ 3,479
1,308

$ 88,164,818
33,147,336

75J, 545
164,096

1,491
3,270

37,784,922
82,868,340

205,353
538,106

$ 9,548

$241,965,416

1,661,100

$ 5,441
811
2,407

$137,885,822
20,552,362
60,9~8_!194

478,770
119,490
465,635

$ 8,659

$219,436,378

1,063,895

$ 4,473
2,276
---..!..? 204

$113,354,766
57,678,392
30,51!1768

885,584
476,681
274,881

TOTAL GENERAL

$ 7,953

$201,544,926

1,637,146

TOTAL RETAIL SALES

$26,160

$662,946,720

4,362,141

TOTAL COMPARISON
I
0)

0

CONVENIENCE:

I

Food Stores
Drugs &amp; Proprietary
Eating &amp; Drinking Places
TOTAL CONVENIENCE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL:
Automotive
Gasoline Service Station
Hardware, Lumber, and Garden

Source:

'

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

�....... •••••a
TABLE E-7
2000 EXPECTED SPENDING POTENTIAL AND
SUPPORTALE BUILDING AREA

(NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS - 27,192)

COMMERCIAL CATEGORY

SPENDING POTENTIAL (In 1990 Dollars)
PER HOUSEHOLD
TOTAL SALES

SUPPORTABLE
BUILDING AREA
(SQUARE FEET)

COMPARISON:
General Merchandise
Apparel &amp; Accessary
Furniture, Furnishings &amp;
Equipment
Other Comparison
I

$ 3,479
1,308

$ 94,600,968
35,567,136

808,555
176,075

1,491
3,270

40,543,272
88,917,840

220,344
577,389

$ 9,548

$259,629,216

1,782,363

$ 5,441
811
21_407

$147,951,672
22,052,712
65,4511_144

513,721
128,213
4991_627

$ 8,659

$235,455,528

1,141,561

$ 4,473
2,276
1,204

$121,629,816
61,888,992
32,739,168

950,233
511,479
294,947

TOTAL GENERAL

$ 7,953

$216,257,976

1,756,659

TOTAL RETAIL SALES

$26,160

$711 ,3421?20

4,_§80, 583

TOTAL COMPARISON

0)

f-'

I

CONVENIENCE:
Food Stores
Drugs &amp; Proprietary
Eating &amp; Drinking Places
TOTAL CONVENIENCE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL:
Automotive
Gasoline Service Station
Hardware, Lumber, and Garden

Source:

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

�c------ l· ··••a• •
TABLE E-8
2010 EXPECTED SPENDING POTENTIAL AND
SUPPORTALE BUILDING AREA

(NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS - 30,900)

COMMERCIAL CATEGORY

SPENDING POTENTIAL (In 1990 Dollars)
PER HOUSEHOLD
TOTAL SALES

SUPPORTABLE
BUILDING AREA
(SQUARE FEET)

COMPARISON:
$ 3,479
1,308

$107,501,100
40,417,200

918,813
200,085

1,491
3!270

46,071,900
101,043,000

250,391
6561123

$ 9,548

$295,033,200

2,025,412

$ 5,441
21407

$168,126,900
25,059,900
74,376,300

583,774
145,697
5671758

$ 8,659

$267,563,100

1,297,229

$ 4,473
2,276
1,204

$138,215,700
70,328,400
37,203,600

1,079,810
581,226
335,168

TOTAL GENERAL

$ 7,953

$245,747,700

1,996,204

TOTAL RETAIL SALES

$261160

$808,34~!009

_?_1318,845

General Merchandise
Apparel &amp; Accessary
Furniture, Furnishings &amp;
Equipment
Other Comparison
I
O',
N
I

TOTAL COMPARISON
CONVENIENCE:
Food Stores
Drugs &amp; Proprietary
Eating &amp; Drinking Places
TOTAL CONVENIENCE

8ll

GENERAL COMMERCIAL:
Automotive
Gasoline Service Station
Hardware, Lumber, and Garden

Source:

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

�-·---- ···••11• •
TABLE E-9
TOTAL SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL LAND
IN ROCHESTER HILLS
1990-2010

1990

SQUARE FEET
OF BUILDING

I

COMPARISON

1995

ACREAGE
OF TOTAL
DEVELOPMENT

SQUARE FEET
OF BUILDING

2000

ACREAGE
OF TOTAL
DEVELOPMENT

SQUARE FEET
OF BUILDING

2010

ACREAGE
OF TOTAL
DEVELOPMENT

SQUARE FEET
OF BUILDING

ACREAGE
OF TOTAL
DEVELOPMENT

1,539,509

141.4

1,661,100

152.5

1,782,363

163.7

2,025,412

186.0

986,020

90.5

1,063,895

97.7

1,141,561

104.8

1,297,229

119.1

1,517,308

139.3
-

1,637,146

150.3

1,756,659

161. 3

1,996,204

183.3

O'\

w
I

CONVENIENCE
GENERAL
TOTAL

Source:

371.2

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

400.5

429.8

488.4

�TABLE E-10
TOTAL SUPPORTABLE
COMKER.CIAL LAND
AT CAPACITY
CITY OF R.OCHESTFR. HILLS

COMPARISON

191.5 Acres

CONVENIENCE

122.6 Acres

GENERAL

188.7 Acres

TOTAL

502.8 Acres

-64-

�FUTURE COMMERCIAL IMPACT OF CITY OF ROCHESTER

In addition to the commercial acreage needs generated by
the current •and projected population of Rochester Hills, the
City of Rochester will add disposable income to the area.
The 1990 SEMCOG Regional Development Forecast estimates that
3,468 households are located in the City of Rochester.
The
average household income is reported to be approximately
$35,065.
The disposable income per household is calculated
to be $18,935.
The City of Rochester can expect to generate
a total disposable income of $65,666,580 in 1990.
An estimated total of 175,000 square feet of retail space is located
in the Rochester Central Business District. The total amount
of commercial acreage in the City of Rochester has not been
tabulated and is unavailable.
Although there will be considerable interchange among City of Rochester Hills and City of
Rochester shoppers, it would not be possible to accurately
assess the impact on each city without a detailed shopper
origin/destination study.
FUTURE COMMERCIAL IMPACT OF SURROUNDING - COMMUNITIES

The City of Rochester Hills is surrounded by Oakland
Township, Orion Township, the City of Auburn Hills, Bloomfield Township, the City of Troy, and Shelby Township.
In
1990, these six surrounding communities contained 78,658
households.
It is retail trade generated by these surrounding communities which is supporting the amount of retail
development in Rochester Hills which exceeds the needs of the
city's own residents.
During December of 1990, Gerald
Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated conducted a vacancy
survey of commercial space in the City of Rochester Hi 11 s.
Our survey indicated that slightly less than 5% of commercial
space in the city was unoccupied.
This level of vacancy is
very low; many viable shopping areas exhibit a 5 to 10
percent vacancy rate.
This low vacancy rate indicates that
the current amount of commercial development is apparently
not pushing the market to its limits.
It also indicates that
the communities which surround Rochester Hills provide a
substantial and healthy cushion to support the amount of
retail space in the city which exceeds the needs of the
city's own population.
Let us consider the future impact of each of the six (6)
surrounding communities:
Oakland Township is a low-density, primarily residential
community located north of the City of Rochester Hi 11 s.
By
design and intent, Oakland Township has very little retail
development to serve its population. The community contained
2,864 households in 1990 and had a relatively high median
-65-

�•
household income of $57,649. Access between Oakland Township
and the shopping districts of Rochester Hills is very good by
way of Adams Road, Orion Road, and Rochester Road.
It is
very 1 ikely ' that the City of Rochester Hills is ful f i 11 ing
most of the retail shopping needs of Oakland Township
residents
in
the
discount
and
general
merchandising
categories.
However, Oakland Township residents have a
relatively high median household income ($57,649 in 1990) and
many of the upscale retail purchases of residents of this
community are probably made in Birmingham and Troy. Oakland
Township has had a long-term policy of discouraging any
significant commercial development within its boundaries, and
although it will grow gradually, it does present a viable,
permanent retail market for stores in Rochester Hills.
Orion Township is located northwest of the City of
Rochester Hills and is accessible by way of Orion Road or
Silver Bell/Adams Roads.
The Village of Lake Orion located
within Orion Township does not effectively compete with the
offerings of Rochester Hills.
Many of the stores in the
downtown shopping district of the Village of Lake Orion
consist of specialty stores such as picture framing stores,
hobby shops, and other unique offerings which have a more
specialized clientele. There is one K-Mart Center located in
Orion Township near the Village of Lake Orion. However, the
City of Rochester Hills still represents a strong retail draw
to residents of Orion Township.
In 1990, Orion Township had
7,950 households and a median household income of $42,948.
The master plan and zoning ordinance of Orion Township do not
propose or encourage significant increases in retail development.
The community wishes to maintain a semi-rural lowerdensity residential image.
Therefore, Orion Township wi 11
also continue to be a potentially strong market for retail
sales within the City of Rochester Hills.
The City of Auburn Hills is located west of Rochester
Hills and consists of the former Pontiac Township which
remained after the City of Pontiac was incorporated many
years ago.
In 1990, Auburn Hills had 6,693 households and a
comparatively lower median household income of $37,283.
Auburn Hills is directly accessible to Rochester Hills by way
of Walton Boulevard, Hamlin Road, Auburn Road, or M-59.
Auburn Hills also is drawn to the City of Pontiac Central
Business District which currently competes with Rochester
Hills for purchases by Auburn Hills residents.
The proposed
2,088,139 square foot shopping mall in Auburn Hills will, of
course, directly compete with Rochester Hills for retail
dollars originating in the Auburn Hills community.
The
proposed mega-mall will contain 30% clearance retail outlets,
30% traditional discount merchandisers, 30% manufacturers
outlets, and 10% food and services establishments.
Thus, it
will be a strong competitive force which will siphon off
-66-

�•
trade from Rochester Hills as well as from other surrounding
communities.
Bloomfield Township is located southwest of the City of
Rochester Hills and does not represent a strong market
component within the Rochester Hills trade area.
In 1990,
Bloomfield Township had 16,768 households and an extremely
high median household income of $71,077.
Bloomfield Township
is accessible to retail areas in Rochester Hills by way of
Adams Road or the I-75/M-59 connection.
Because of the high
income levels in this community, most shoppers will be drawn
to Birmingham or to Troy rather than to Rochester Hills.
Only those shopping dollars specifically aimed at discount
type purchases would be attracted to Rochester Hills and
probably will be siphoned off to Auburn Hills when the
mega-mall is eventually constructed.
The City of Troy is located directly south of the City
of Rochester Hills.
According to analyses conducted by the
Oakland County Economic Development staff, that portion of
Troy located north of 17 Mile Road is significantly oriented
to the City of Rochester Hills trade area.
Households
located south of 17 Mile Road shop primarily in Troy,
Birmingham, and other communities to the south.
In 1990,
Troy had a population of 26,749 households and a relatively
high median household income of $49,187.
Troy has numerous
good and direct connections to shopping areas in Rochester
Hills by way of Adams Road, Crooks Road, Livernois, Rochester
Road, John R, and Dequindre.
Shelby Township is located directly east of the City of
Rochester Hills in Macomb County.
In 1990, this rapidly
growing township had 17,634 households and a median household
income of $43,857.
According to analyses completed by the
Macomb County Economic Development staff, Shelby Township has
a much stronger retail shopping orientation to stores located
to the east in Sterling Heights than it does to stores
located in .Rochester Hills.
During recent years, there has
been considerable development of discount type anchor stores
such as Target or Mervyn's around the original Lakeside
Regional Shopping Mall.
The combination of a major regional
shopping mall such as Lakeside which is augmented by a number
of discount and other supporting stores creates an extremely
strong
draw.
Furthermore,
connect ions
between
Shelby
Township and the City of Rochester Hills by way of 23 Mile
Road or Avon Road are often congested and generally serve as
a deterrent.
Conversely, access to shopping areas in
Sterling Heights on the east is excellent, primarily by way
of the M-53 expressway.
It would appear that Shelby Township
will not be a strong supporting economic neighbor to future
retail development in the City of Rochester Hills.

-67-

�This analysis has shown that the population of the City
of Rochester Hills can support a total of 502 .8 acres of
commercial development at that point when the community is
totally
built
up.
In
other words
when
the maximum
residential holding capacity has been reached, the residents
within the community could support no more than this amount
of retail space.
However, as has previously been pointed
out, the city could support additional retail space if it
seeks
to
serve
retail
markets
beyond
its
municipal
boundaries. The city currently has 722.4 acres of land zoned
for commercial development.
If the city's own optimum population will support no more than 502.8 acres of retail
development, Rochester Hills is therefore overzoned by 219.6
acres of commercial land to meet the future needs of its own
population.
As was
previously pointed out,
the city
currently has 504 acres of existing commercial development.
This indicates that the city has already reached or used up
its total commercial development potential based on the
optimum size of its own population when fully developed.
A city has three basic options when planning the amount
of future commercial development land for which it will zone:
1.

The community can plan for the needs of its own population only.
Under such an approach, Rochester Hills
would have to now stop most future commercial development because this analysis has shown that it already has
reached the maximum level which the city's optimum
population will support.

2.

A community can plan for less commercial development
than its population will support.
For example, Oakland
Township has followed the basic planning premise that
people should reside in Oakland Township, but do their
shopping elsewhere.
It does not wish to have any
significant retail development.
It is too late for
Rochester Hills to consider this option,
since it
already has substantial retail development which will
fully meet the needs of its future population growth.

3.

A community can plan for more commercial development
than its own population can internally support.
A good
example of this scenario is the large shopping district
contained in downtown Birmingham.
Under the third
option, a city can specifically decide through appropriate planning policies that it desires to serve as a
strong
shopping magnet
and will
plan accordingly.
Usually a community which follows this option sees the
advantages
of
a
strong
tax base and the overall
amenities
which can
be offered by viable shopping
districts to a community.
It should be pointed out that
-68-

�there are many levels at which this policy could be
carried out.
For example, Rochester Hills could become
a secondary shopping magnet which serves more than its
internal . population, but could still stop substantially
short of becoming a major retail center such as downtown
Birmingham, the Big Beaver Road complex in Troy, or the
proposed mega-mall in Auburn Hills.

OFFICE DEVELOPMENT
Since 1980, office space in southeast Michigan has
increased by more than 40 percent, growing from 80 million
square feet to over 121 million square feet by the end of
1991.
Demand for office space in the Detroit Metropolitan
Area has been affected by downsizing of the "big three"
automobile companies.
As General Motors Corporation, Ford
Motor Company, and Chrysler Corporation continue to strive
for improved efficiency, many office workers are being laid
off.
Since 1986, over 9,000 jobs have been lost in the
automobile industry in Oakland County.
Table E-11 portrays
employment forecasts for the City of Rochester Hills.
While
the city experienced a 178.1 percent increase in employment
in the decade from 1980 to 1990, the projected increase for
the period 1990 to 2010 will be approximately 74.5 percent
according to SEMCOG forecasts.
SEMCOG projects over 15,000
new jobs will be added in Rochester Hills in the period from
1990 to 2010.
The City of Rochester Hills represents an important
office market.
The city currently has 783,216 square feet of
office space.
Future demand for office space in Oakland
County will remain strong, but will be less than the peak
office demand years reached in the mid 1980 's.
Employment
projections prepared by the Southeast Michigan Council of
Governments indicate that employment within the finance,
insurance, real estate, and service industries in Oakland
County is expected to increase to 312,031 jobs by the year
2005.
By applying an industry average of 196 square feet of
off ice space per employee, the demand for office space in
Oakland County should reach 18 million additional square feet
by the year 2005 (See Table E-12).

-69-

�Ill

TABLE E-11

II

EMPLOYMENT FORECAST FOR
ROCHESTF.R. HILLS

1111

Ill
1111

1111

Ill

1980

7,262

1985

8,978

1990

20,196

1995

23,959

2000

27,722

2005

31,484

2010

35,247

Change 1980 - 1990:
12,934

178.1%

Change 1990 - 2010:
15,051

Source:

74.5%

SEMCOG Regional Development Forecast, 1990

-70-

�TABLE E-12
FUTURE OFFICE SPACE DEMAND IN OAKLAND COUNTY

Year

Employment
growth from 1985

Square foot to
emeloyment factor

Total office
demand
(square feet)

1990
1995
2000
2005

25 , 858
42,887
73,728
92,911

196
196
196
196

5,068,168
8,405,852
14,450,688
18,210,556

Rochester Hills
is strategically located near
the
Oakland Technology Park and has strong potential for future
office development.
The city is served by M-59 which
connects to I-75.
These transportation linkages create a
viable office market development area.
Projected road
improvements will make Rochester Hills more attractive to
future office development.
From 1984 through 1988, there was an intensive period of
office construction in Rochester Hills (See Table E-13).
During 1987 and 1988, a total of 13 office building permits
were pulled by developers each year. The dollar value of new
office development in the city peaked in 1988 with $6,773,600
worth of office construction in one year. Since 1988, office
development has dropped dramatically due to the economic
recession.
In 1990, only one office construction permit was
pulled with a modest value of $22,000.
Rochester Hills currently has 783,216 square feet of
developed office space.
Of this amount, 295,942 square feet
are used for medical office purposes and 487,274 square feet
are used for general office purposes. The city currently has
a 22. 3 percent vacancy rate in medical office space and a
17.5 percent vacancy rate in general office space.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

There are currently over 12 million square feet of
vacant industrial and high technology space available for
lease in the Greater Detroit area.
Oakland County has acout
6.8 million square feet or 55 percent of the total. There is
a trend in the industrial market to construct speculative
buildings that adapt to high-tech users.
Oakland County has
about 30 percent of the total industrial acreage zoned for
industrial development in Southeast Michigan.
The primary

-71-

�II

TABLE E-13

~

OFFICE DEVELOPMENT IN
ROCHESTER. HILLS

•
•
•
-

1981 TO 1990

Dollar
Value

Number of
Permits

1981

$

100,000

2

1982

$

520,000

1

1983

$

486,500

3

1984

$1,415,000

4

1985

$4,922,000

8

1986

$5,500,000

5

1987

$5,370,200

13

1988

$6,773,600

13

1989

$3,195,500

4

1990

$

1

Source:

22,000

Oakland County Department of
Devel,opmen t

-72-

Community and Economic

�•
area of industrial · growth is expected to occur in Auburn
Hills due to the 1,100 acre Oakland Technology Park and
Chrysler's new Technology Center.
Other areas of projected
industrial growth within Oakland County are expected to occur
in Novi and Wixom due to the availability of land and
accessibility to the I-696 expressway. The master plan
recommends that the city al locate l, 016 .1 acres for industrial
development;
698 .1
of
these
acres
are
already
developed.
By contrast, Farmington Hills has 643 acres, Novi
has 1,784 acres, and Wixom has 848 acres.
It is expected
that the typical industrial park of the future will be one of
a business park rather than a manufacturing environment. As
robotics and testing facilities expand and assembly functions
decline, companies wi 11 want to locate closer to interstate
highways and their major clients or customers.
It is
expected that the supply of available industrial acreage will
continue to exceed the demand which will result in increased
marketing efforts by industrial park developers to attract
new businesses to the area.
New industrial parks that are
located near freeways and major suppliers will compete with
older existing parks and secondary locations causing a movement from one industrial area to another within the Greater
Detroit Metropolitan Area.
Much of the job growth in Oakland County in recent years
has been in service industries, especially in the higher paid
service sectors of those industries.
Although growth will be
concentrated in non-manufacturing jobs, manufacturing jobs
outside of the auto industry will also do well in Oakland
County.
Auto industry employment in Oakland County is
expected to suffer a net loss of 1,000 jobs between 1989 and
1992 with sharp declines in the first two years followed by a
significant rebound in 1992.
This information is from an
economic
forcast
performed
by
University
of
Michigan
economists,
George A. Fulton and Donald R. Grimes, for
Oakland County's Economic Development Di vision.
Much of the
rebound in 1992 will be due to the planned completion of
research centers operated by Chrysler, Nissan, and Volkswagen
of America.
According to the Fulton-Grimes study,
manufacturing
sectors that will continue to grow include scientific instruments, plastics, printing and publishing, and chemicals.
Non
manufacturing sectors that will continue to grow include
wholesale
trade,
retail
trade
other
than
restaurants,
finance, and services.
Within the services industry, the
business and professional category will add 15,000 jobs
between 1989 and 1992.
The health category will grow by
6,000 jobs and other services wi 11 add 7,000 jobs.
The
construction industry is expected to lose 1,000 in Oakland

-73-

�County over the 1989-1992
utilities will remain flat.

period,

and

transportation

and

Table E~ l4 portrays industrial development in Rochester
Hills between 1981 and 1990.
Industrial development in the
city began to accelerate in 1983 and peaked in 1986 when 42
industrial construction permits were pulled with a total
dollar value of construction of $34,389,760 . Since 1986,
annual increases in value of industrial construction in the
city have decreased, but there is still substantial yearly
industrial investment in Rochester Hills.
Despite the current economic recession, 12 industrial building permits were
pulled in 1990 for a total dollar value of $5,216,100.
The
following
table
shows existing
industrial
research parks located in the City of Rochester Hills.

and

TABLE E-15
EXISTING INDUSTRIAL/RESEARCH PARKS
IN ROCHESTER HILLS

Park Name

Acreage

Avon Industrial Park
Avon Tech Park
Garland Industrial Park
Industro-Plex East
Industro-Plex West
Northfield Industrial Park
Rochester Hills Corporate
Rochester Hills Executive Park
Rochester Industrial Park
Royce Haley Industrial Park
T.A.N. Industrial Park
Commerce Park of Rochester Hills
Total Acreage

33

50
34

40
20
60
63
86
35
10
20
25
476

The new future land use plan recommends a reduction in
the amount of industrial development land in Rochester Hills.
The 1986 plan indicated a total of 1,300. 7 acres of industrial land, while the new plan recommends a total of 1,016.1
acres.
Large areas of former industrial land have been
changed to mixed-use development or residential use because

-74-

�TABLE E-14
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN
ROCBESTF.Jl HILLS

1981 TO 1990

Dollar
Value

Number of
Permits

1981

$ 1,115,000

5

1982

$ 1,860,000

3

1983

$ 3,340,000

8

1984

$ 7,748,000

19

1985

$12,553,000

28

1986

$34,389,760

42

1987

$12,092,511

19

1988

$ 9,560,300

10

1989

$ 3,490,200

9

1990

$ 5,216,100

12

Source:

Oakland County Department of Community and Economic
Development

-75-

�TABLE E-16
ANNUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
1960 - 1990

Year

Sguare Footage

1960
1964
1965
1967
1968

2,112
76,296
69,080
61,237
7,740

1969
1970
1971
1972
1973

80,461
127,236
74,623
27,360
50,822

1974
1975
1976
1977
1978

20,948
99,339
57,657
91,210
100,485

1979
1980
1981
198.2
1983

152,314
79,064
97,388
61,480
55,088

1984
1985
1986
1987

621,174
699,963
563,001
1,091,187

1988
1989
1980

517,926
137,708
250,628

TOTAL

5,273,527

-76-

�of problems of land use compatibility and because of the lack
of a strong future market for industrial development in the
city.
As the residential neighborhoods of the city became
more fully developed during the last ten years , it became
apparent
that
some
proposed
industrial
areas
were
incompatible with surrounding residential uses.
The new
"mixed-use" land use category would include development of
several light industrial/research and development type uses.
Currently,
Oakland
County
contains
more
foreign
companies than any other county in Southeastern Michigan.
This trend is expected to continue based on the county's
overall quality of life and variety of residential areas as
access to the automotive market, access to the industrial
market,
and
availability of executive and
professional
talent.
Oakland County could be positively impacted by the new
marketing approach which the counties of Oakland, Wayne, and
Macomb have initiated.
This marketing approach is known as
"Greater Detroit - A World Technology Center."
This new
campaign was created to help portray the region as a major
development and investment location for new technology.

-77-

�Urban Design

�Urban Design
This section of the master plan focuses on the visual
appearance of •Rochester Hills.
It contains the following sections: 1) A recommendation for an Interrelated Open Space
System, 2) Land Use Transitions, 3) the Relation of Buildings
to the Environment, 4) Entranceways, 5) Revitalization of the
Olde Towne District, and 6) Detention and Retention Ponds.
Rochester Hills is approximately three-quarters developed.
As the city nears total build-out during the next ten
to twenty years, there is still an opportunity for the city to
achieve a higher quality of visual environment in both private
and public developments.
There is a need for the planning
commission to aggressively implement new approaches to planning for the visual quality of the city. This section of the
master plan sets forth specific recommendations and approaches
to deal with aesthetic issues.
INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM

In a well-designed city, open space areas such as parks,
boulevards, parkways, and bicycle pathways should flow between
land use areas and serve as visual and functional linkages.
Changes from one land use to another should not be visually
abrupt
as
one
moves
from
commercial
to
office
to
multiple-family to single-family land use areas.
One way to
provide a more visually pleasing land use pattern in the city
would be to develop an interrelated open space linkages
system.
This concept is based on the idea that public parks
and open space areas, large ins ti tuti.onal and private open
spaces, public boulevards, special pathways and trails, and
significant natural areas can be interlinked so they create a
semi-continuous "greenbelt image" throughout the city.
By
relating or interconnecting these open space elements, a more
pleasing visual image can be created throughout the city and
the transition from one land use area to another will be
softened and made more attractive.
The linkage of open space
areas in the city also has certain functional advantages.
For
example, pedestrian and bicycle pathways can be interconnected
with parks and nature areas so that a person can enjoy a
continuous ride or hike throughout many beautiful natural and
man-made areas of the city.
Institutional areas such as
Oakland University or Michigan Christian College could be
linked to various open space pathway systems which serve the
broader city.

-78-

�The illustration following this page shows th~ integrated
open space system recommended by the master plan.
This map
shows
the
public
parks
and
open
space
areas,
large
institutional and private open spaces,
school locations,
boulevards, pathways and trails, natural areas, and other
elements which will comprise the interrelated open space
system in the city.
Detailed pathway linkages to individual
schools are not shown because they represent a level of detail
beyond the scope of a master plan.
The
Rochester
Hills
transportation
plan
recommends
development of seven boulevards in the city: Dequindre Boulevard, Rochester Boulevard, Livernois Boulevard, Crooks Boulevard, Hamlin Boulevard, Walton Boulevard, and Adams Boulevard.
Boulevards create a park-like corridor in an urban setting.
These future boulevards in Rochester Hills will also serve as
the "main street" of many of the residential sub-communities
within the city.
Boulevards help give a human scale to the
land use pattern.
Boulevards can also be planned and designed so they
accommodate the pedestrian, the bicyclist, and the automobile
alike.
A person who travels along a boulevard in Rochester
Hills will have two kinds of visual experiences.
The first
kind of experience is that of the park-like setting created by
the
grass,
trees,
and
pathways
which
exist
along
the
boulevard.
The second visual expression is formed by the
surrounding community or development pattern adjacent to the
boulevard.
The design of adjoining buildings: their scale,
landscaping, and setback from the boulevard, help to create
the total visual expression as one travels along a boulevard
in the city.
New development along this city's boulevards
should be designed to strengthen the visual character of each
boulevard.
Specific design characteristics which can greatly
enhance or detract from the visual quality of boulevards in
Rochester Hills include the following:
building height,
setbacks, building orientation, parking lots, curb cuts, and
landscaping.
Each of these factors must be carefully regulated and planned along the city's boulevards to preserve
their visual attractiveness.
The seven boulevards proposed
for Rochester Hills will provide a sense of spaciousness and
greenery that will add to the beauty of adjacent neighborhoods.
Since boulevards act as a link between areas of
recreational activity, they can be used for pleasure driving,
as well as walking,
bicycling,
and horseback riding if
adjacent trails are planned.
1

The City of Rochester Hills has adopted a separate Recreation Master Plan. This section is concerned with the urban
design/aesthetic role open space can play in development of
the city.
It is not intended as a plan for recreation
facilities.

-79-

�PUBLIC PARKS AND OPEN SPACE AREAS
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.

AVON NATURE CENTER AND CITY HALL
BLOOMER PARK
BORDEN PARK
THELMA G. SPENCER PARK
PINE TRACE GOLF CLUB/AVONDALE PARK
RIVERBEND PARK
CITY OF ROCHESTER MUNICIPAL PARK
ADAMS ROAD PARK
TIENKEN ROAD PARK

ELEMENTARt SCHOOLS (PUBLIC)

0

0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

4l!)
LARGE INSTITUTIONAL AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.

GREAT OAKS COUNTRY CLUB
MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY
BROOKWOOD GOLF COURSE
ROCHESTER HILLS GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB

DEERFIELD
BREWSTER
BROOKLANDS
HAMLIN
LONG MEADOW
McGREGOR
MEADOW BROOK
NORTH HILL
STILES
UNIVERSITY HILLS

MIDDLE SCHOOLS (PUBLIC)

41)

AVONDALE
HART
REUTHER
VAN HOOSEN
WEST

0
0
0
G

HIGH SCHOOLS (PUBLIC)
G)

ADAMS
ROCHESTER

0

PRIVATE SCHOOLS

€)

HOLY FAMILY
LUTHERAN HIGH NORTHWEST
ROCHESTER HILLS BAPTIST
ST. JOHN LUTHERAN

0

€)

$

SPECIAL PATHWAYS AND TRAILS
0.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
Zl.

PAINT CREEK TRAILWAY
JOHN R. PARKWAY
TIENKEN PARKWAY
SOUTH BOULEVARD PARKWAY
AVON PARKWAY
PARKWAY ON REALIGNED
OF ADAMS ROAD

PUBLIC BOULEVARDS

T.

u.
v.

\:Y.

z.

DEQUINDRE BOULEVARD
ROCHESTER BOULEVARD
LIVERNOIS BOULEVARD
CROOKS BOULEVARD
HAMLIN BOULEVARD
WALTON BOULEVARD
ADAMS BOULEVARD

SIGNIFICANT NATURAL AREAS
a.
b.
c.
d.

CLINTON RIVER LINEAR OPEN AREA WITH SIGNIFICANT WOODLANDS
AND WETLANDS
SARGENT CREEK
STONY CREEK/WINKLER POND
OTHER SENSITIVE HABITAT AREAS

FigureD-1

INTERRELATED
OPEN SPACE
SYSTEM

SPECIAL DISTRICTS
e.
f.

g.

STONEY CREEK HISTORIC DISTRICT
WINKLER MILL POND HISTORIC DISTRICT
ROCHESTER HILLS MUSEUM AT VAN HOOSEN FARM

GERALD LL'EDTKE AND Asso~~TEs
--

I

~ RP ~ E D

�I

I
I

II

•II

Development of an interconnected open space system in
Rochester Hills will provide residents with a means to travel
from one park or residential area to another and to engage in
hiking, biking, and/or horseback riding while experiencing the
city's nathral scenic amenities and open spaces.
Residents of
Rochester Hills can participate in alternative modes of transportation
including
automobile
driving,
bicycling,
and
walking.
The bicycle is a slow moving vehicle in relation to
the automobile, and the pedestrian is slow moving in relation
to both the bicycle and the automobile.
None of these three
mix very well together.
To compensate for this basic incompatibility, trail ways in the city should al ways be separate
from the roadway itself.
The map following this page shows the proposed bicycle
pathway system in Rochester Hills as it relates to the
integrated open space system.
It should be pointed out that
it is not always possible to link every open space area in the
city due to various development constraints.
Linkages have
been planned wherever feasible within the overall development
pattern of Rochester Hills.
Safe walking school routes have
been carefully considered in designing the interrelated open
space system.
Implementation of the interrelated open space system can
be achieved through a "greenway planning approach."
Greenway planning is a strategy which emphasizes the protection,
preservation,
and
enhancement of natural,
cultural,
and
recreation
resources
through
a
variety
of
conservation
measures.
These measures can include less-than-fee acquisition, land use controls, cooperative land owner agreements,
and tax incentives.
Greenway planning is a distinct departure from transitional open space conservation planning in
which protection strategies usually involve public agency
acquisition and management.
The greenway planning approach
assumes that a relatively small percentage of a landscape area
will be in public ownership and that private land owners will
play a major land stewardship role.
This assumption makes
sense because many significant landscapes in Rochester Hills
are too large, too diverse, and too complex to be managed by
the city alone.
The specific elements
system are as follows:

of

-81-

the

interrelated

open

space

�•
PUBLIC PARKS AND OPEN SPACE AREAS
A.
B.

c.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.

Avon Nature Center and City Hall
Bloomer Unit No. 2 of the Rochester-Utica State Recreation
Area
Borden Park
Thelma G. Spencer Park
Pine Trace Golf Club/Avondale Park
Riverbend Park
City of Rochester Municipal Park
Adams Road Park
Tienken Road Park

LARGE INSTITUTIONAL AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE

J.
K.
L.
M.
N.

Great Oaks Country Club
Michigan Christian College
Oakland University
Brookwood Golf Course
Rochester Hills Golf and Country Club

SPECIAL PARKWAYS AND TRAILS

o.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.

Paint Creek Trailway
John R. Parkway
Tienken Parkway
Parkway on Realigend Section of Adams Road
South Boulevard Parkway
Avon Parkway

PUBLIC BOULEVARDS
U.

v.

W.
X.
Y.
Z.
1.

Dequindre Boulevard
Rochester Boulevard
Livernois Boulevard
Crooks Boulevard
Hamlin Boulevard
Walton Boulevard
Adams Boulevard

SIGNIFICANT NATURAL AREAS

a.
b.
c.
d.

Clinton River Linear Open Area With Significant Woodlands
and Welands
Sargents Creek
Stoney Creek/Winkler Pond
Other Sensitive Habitat Areas

SPECIAL DISTRICTS
e.
f.
g.

Stoney Creek Historic District
Winkler Mill Pond Historic District
Rochester Hills Museum at Van Hoosen Farm

-82-

�,. -

711!1 ~~~~~~~~

.,~.
.,.,.,·'
Pathways shown here are part of the
Interrelated Open Space System.
The
map on the following page portrays all
existing and planned pathways in the
city.

.,., ·"

, ., ., .,·

.,.,

,~-

,,·

"" I
/Je~~

A

---

·111

'
'

/ :R.._~

"'Ill

~

r

-'.'!kf:J."
~-··- -~,.,,.,
~
. !.? ~ -

EXISTING PATHWAYS
PLANNED PATHWA YS

O,i&lt;I'.:

"1,vo

lbi,,,

a.'&lt;' .,,\,,:;,
V
,•.
~~

oit-

. -·
-·

c..~,.,
,., .

.,_
&lt;Ii~.

·~:,
' '.'-:.,

u

,,,:;:

•✓.

-,~

c~o,..

·-'.'),.

'~~·· ....

~
·· ~

GrnALD LunTKE AND AssoCIATFs
11\CUHt'UHATED

~

" ~If-;:

Figure D- 11

PLANNED PATHWAYS
IN RELATION TO
INTERRELATED
OPEN SPACE SYSTEM

�r
Figure D-111

"f'
r
r

CITY OF
ROCHESTER
HILLS
MASTER
PLAN:

PATHWAYS

i:.J
0:

Cl

z

,~

H

:::&gt;

QI

I

i:.J

ROCHESTER

---~""

'

r
r
r

Cl

l
'

-'
((\_

l~

k_

•r

a.

; H

::i::
Cl)

z

3:
0

----

EXISTING
PATHWAYS

~

PLANNED
PATHWAYS

&gt;&lt;
a:l

i-l

i:.J
::i::
Cl)

r
r
llt

\

.

N

I ltilCH • 1 100 FEET

A

�I

I
I
I
I
I

I

•
I

Irt 1981, Avon Township voters approved a $2 million bond
fund specifically for the installation of 8 foot wide pathways
along every major road in the township, as per the adopted
Master Pathway Plan.
By establishing the Master Pathway Plan
the township ( and now, the city) was able to require that
developers of property which abutted a major road install the
8 foot wide pathway.
Therefore, wherever possible, pathway
installation has been accomplished by private development.
The Pathway Bond Fund has been used to fill in gaps along
major roads where development has already occurred, or where
development is not expected to occur for several years.
The
original $2 million bond fund has been nearly depleted.
To
complete the installation of pathways as per the Master
Pathway Plan,
it is estimated that it will require an
additional $3 million of public funds.
The Advisory Bike Path Committee has no formal, stated
criteria which are used to establish a priority list for
projects.
The committee has developed an informal, yet
effective, method of developing its work plan for each year .
. The committee's primary concern is to see that pathways are
installed where they are needed most to improve pedestrian
safety along walking routes to the schools. Second, pathways
should be installed near other major pedestrian traffic
generators, such as shopping centers and major residential
areas.
Finally, pathways should be installed along all other
major roads, beginning with those with the heaviest traffic
volumes.
Each year, the Advisory Bike Path Committee prepares
a priority list of pathway segments to serve as a workplan for
the construction season.
The workplan is forwarded t ·o the
City Council as a recommendation to allow the City Council to
formally adopt the workplan.
In 1990, the city adopted a separate "Master Recreation
Plan" which sets forth recreation facilities projects and
improvements.
This plan was adopted as an element of the
Master Land Use Plan.
The Master Recreation Plan recommends
development of several key elements of the interrelated open
space system including:
Avon Nature Center and City Hall, the
Van Hoosen Farm Complex, Borden Park, Thelma G. Spencer Park,
Riverbend Park, Adams Road Park, and Tienken Road Park.
The integrated open space system concept also includes
seven boulevards:
Dequindre Boulevard, Rochester Boulevard,
Livernois
Boulevard,
Crooks
Boulevard,
Hamlin
Boulevard,
Wal ton
Boulevard,
and
Adams
Boulevard.
The boulevard
proposals
were
approved
by
the
city
as
part
of
the

-85-

�I
Comprehensive Transportation Plan prepared by BRW, Inc. or as
a result of adoption of a special corridor study for the Adams
Bouleva~d.
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan was adopted
by the Planning Commission in 1989 and the Adams Road Corridor
Study was adopted in 1991.
The preservation of scenic areas and sensitive habitats
along the Clinton River will also be important to implementation of the integrated open space system.
The Master
Recreation Plan identifies the Clinton River as one of the
city's most
valuable natural
features
which contributes
significantly to the overall character and image of the
community.
The city should strive to acquire any lands which
become available along the river and protect and preserve the
quality of related natural habitats.
In the long-term, the
river should become a greenway through the city, providing a
link between parks and community facilities, including the
proposed multi-purpose recreation center, City Hall, the Avon
Nature Area , the Paint Creek Trail, and the Rochester Utica
State Recreation Area.
Other significant waterways which
similarly should be preserved and protected include Stoney
Creek and Paint Creek.
A detailed discussion of the natural
features of the Clinton River is contained in the section of
the Master Plan entitled "Natural Features."
The following section sets
analysis of the costs of carrying
space system through 1996 .
Total
the system have been indicated.
the basis for the cost estimates.

-86-

forth a brief budgetary
out the interrelated open
costs for each element of
Detailed footnotes explain

�1IIIIIJ ~

INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
Capital Improvement Program

TABLE D-1

Fund
Road
1992 Hamlin .
1992 Hamlin
J992 ' ~dams
1992 Adams
. 1992 John R
1992 John R ·

.!II!!
Res Blvd
Prkway
Prkway
Prkway
Prkway

South Blvd Prkway
• 1993 ., J.ivemojs . Res l3lvd
1993 John R
Prkway
1993 \ John R
Mway
1993

&gt;\

-..J

I

1994 Adams
\ 1994 • ·•· Adams\ ·,•,
i994 Adams
1994 ·• · Crook$
❖
1994 Crooks
1994 · ' Livernois . f
1994 Livernois
1994 . Livernois . '
1995

1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996

From

To
·. Crooks '(•!
Livernois
Auburn
Hamlin
Auburn
Hamlin

MI Blvd

)1993 , SouUi:BMl :: Prkwaf

I

Pathway
Length (ft)

Road

Year

00

- - -- ----Crooks
South Blvd
Auburn
•'•'· South Blvd
Auburn · ·

Livernois
Walton
Avon
., t : Bloomer •::.,·

Res Blvd
Walton
Res Blvd
Hamlin :
Res Blvd
Avon ·
Res Blvd ; South Blvd
Res Blvd
Auburn
Res Blvd '· South Blvd ,.
Res Blvd
Auburn ·
Res Blvd
·•' Hamlin

Avon
Prkway
Avon ·
Prkway
Avon
Prkway
Avon &gt;·
· Prkway
Avon
Prkway
Tienken
Prkway
Tienken
Prkway
Tienken
Prkway
Tienken
Prkway
Tienken
Pdcway
Washington Prkway
Livernois
Prkway

Cost ($)
\,/ 10,560 · &lt; 700,000
4,500
85,500
?, •• 3,800
72,200 \ '
15,200
288,800
5,080 ,
96,520
3,200
60,800

:.Adams:\:'f /}( :,:Ctookll=}' ): , =\\
Crooks
Avon
Hamlin
Avon ·

Adams
Old Perch
Livernois
RochesteJ
JohnR
Adams ,::?
Brewster
. Livernois
Rochester
Sheldon
Sheldon
Walton

Pathway

&gt;'9i680 .;;,,:;
0
,,;:-3,200
5,280

j83.920:&lt;:)
0
' '60,8()0 / / ··
100,000

.. ·6,20Q j : •: 117,800 '

Pathway

&lt;

tt• •

JAJI &lt;
N/A
\ A,B

A,B
A,B

Tienken

2,000

38,000

A,B

1,000 \)'" ' 19,000

A.B

Old Perch
· Livernois
Rochester
JohnR .,...
Dequindre
Brewster
Livernois
Rochester
Sheldon
Washingtorf
Dequindre
Tienken

3,800

72,200

.. \,. · •· O

:. 0

A,B

-/ N/A\i

4,900

93,100

A,B

( 5,280 ,·•·

100,000

\ A,B

108,300

A,B
A,B

. 5,700 .

1,000
3,900
2,400
2,400
t·••,:;:::;::::~.600'.: •·•:•·•

10,600
O·
2,800
4,600
5,300
6,400 .

8,900
5,280

19,000 · •·••·· · · ·
74,100
45,600
45,600
87,400
201,400
0
53,200
87,400
100,700
121,600 . ,;::.
169,100
100,000

Landscaping

($)
Fund Source
A,B
140,500 j/
C,DAF
A,B : : .: : :, , ,. ., ,.,. , ...,,.,,"':::, 121,500
C,D.E.F
·13,500
}C,D..B.F : A
A,B
27,000
C,D.E.F
t A,B \
27,000 .·.
C,D,E.F
A,B
27,000
C,D.E.F

Avon
Walton
.· Auburn / .. ',
Hamlin
Auburn
Hamlin
Avon

Landscaping

Fund Source

A,B
A,B
A,B
A,B

A.B

N/A
A,B
A,B
A,B
•A,B ••r··
A,B
A,B

\ 24,150 \• { \WC~l!.P {•
13,500

C.0.E.F

.121;soo:;:: ,, c;t&gt;.E.F J•
27,000
C,D.E.F
13,500 ; // C,D,E,P . .

C,D.E.F
&lt;CCP.E.F
121,500
C,D.E.F
121,500 } (:. ~.O.E.F
121,500
C,D.E.F
,:,::121,SOO ,. /_ f C,D.E.F
121,500
C,D.E.F
121,500

· 121.SOO t

· 121,500 .

CJ)AP J

C.O.E.F
C,D,E;F
27,000
C,D.E.F
27,000 )
\ C.D,E.F
27,000
C,D.E.F
13,500 '·
C,D.E,F
40,500
C,D.E.F
27,000 · ' · C~D.E.F .
13,500
C,D.E.F
13,500
, C.O.E.F &gt;
27,000
C,D.E.F
27,000
C;D,E,F
27,000

27,000 ·

Walton
MI Blvd
W Cty Limits
Adams
N/A
40,500
0
0
kochestcr MI Blvd
, 300
A,B :,:;,, ., . ·•\.
M-59
Auburn::•
5,700
70,250 //
Rochester
MI Blvd
Auburn
Hamlin
11,400
A,B
600
140,500
Rochester
MI Blvd
Hamlin
Avon
2,900
A,B
55,100
140,500
Dequindre Res Blvd
M-59
Auburn
4,200
79,800
A,B
60,750
A,B , : .
Dequindre Res Blvd
Auburn
Hamlin
5,000
95,000
60,750
Dequindre Res Blvd
Hamlin
Avon
7,280
138,320
A,B
60,750
Dequindre Res Blvd
City Rochester Washington
A,B •.·:•
1,500
28,500
30,375
Legend: Ml Blvd =Michigan Boulevard RB =Residential Boulevard PW = Parkway A =Pa1hway Fund
B =Private Development C = Future Bond Fund D = State and Federal Grants E =Private Funds F =Other Sources
Prepared by: Rochester Hills Planning Department

C,D.E.F
C,D.E,F
C,D.E.F
C,D,E,F
C,D.E.F
C,D.E,F
C,D.E.F
C,D,E,F

�TABLE D-2

.......
--·· ·

,

INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM

Capital Improvement Program
Summary Table
Fund
Year

Pathway Length (fl)

1992

42,340

803,820

356,500

1993

24,360

462,520

200,250

1994

23,680

449,600

972,000

1995

57,180

1,086,100

297,000

1996

21,780

413,820

604,375

Total

169,340 ft

$3,215,860

$2,430,125

Pathway Cost ($)

I
(X)
(X)

I

Prepared by: Rochester Hills Planning Department

Landscaping Cos&amp; ($)

�..

V

-

INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
Capital Improvement Program
Park Improvements

TABLE D-3

Fund
Year

I

----

Park

Improvements

Cost($)

Funding
Sources

1,500,000

C,D,E,F

1991

Borden Parle

Complete Initial Construction

1991

Van Hoosen Fann
Complex

Renovations to Dairy Barn, Mille House, Calf Barn and Bull Barn

625,000

C,D,E,F

1991

Avondale Park

Complete Initial Construction

413,000

C,D,E,F

1992

Borden Park

Construct Indoor Turf Arena, Mutt-purpose Gym, and Municipal Pool

3,500,000

C,D,E, F

1992

Avon Nature Center

Construct Canoe Launch and Gravel Parking Lot

20,000

C,D,E,F

(X)

I.O

I

Total $9,578,000

Legend: C

=Future Bond Fund

D =State and Federal Grants
E = Pr;vate Funds
Prepared by: Rochester Hills Plann;ng Department

F

= Other Sources

�INTERRELATED OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM

Footnotes

I

1.

"PATHWAY LENGTH" is the length, in feet, of new pathways needed to complete the
pathway network along Parkways and Boulevards within the Interrelated Open
Space System.

2.

"PATHWAY cosr is an estimate of the cost, in dollars, to install the lineal feet of
pathway listed in the previous column. Pathway installation is estimated at a cost
of $100,000 per mile, which has been rounded to $19.00 per lineal foot.

3.

3 different types of roads within the Interrelated Open Space System have been
identified: Parkways, Residential Boulevards, and Michigan Boulevards. The table
abbreviates these road types as Prkway, Res Blvd, and Ml Blvd. A typical Parkway
would be a 2 to 5 lane road, an 8 foot bike path, and landscaping between the road
and the bike path. A Residential Boulevard consists of a 4 lane divided road,
landscaped median, bike path, and landscaping between the path and the road.
The boulevard is typically less than 30 feet wide. A Michigan Boulevard consists
of 4 or more lanes with a landscaped median which is between 45 and 60 feet
wide, a bike path on each side, and landscaping between the path and the road.
For both boulevards, the landscaping strip between the path and the road is
generally 10-15 feet wide.

4.

"LANDSCAPING" contains estimates of cost to install landscaping along all
Parkways and Boulevards within the Interrelated Open Space System. Cost
estimates were developed for three types of road: Parkways, Residential
Boulevards, and Michigan Boulevards.
Parkways

$27.000/mile

Landscaping along Parkways includes planting 88 large shade trees per mile on
each side of the road, which is enough trees to plant them, on average, every 60
feet. The estimate assumes an average price of $85.50/tree plus an installation
factor of 1. 8 per tree.
Residential Boulevards

$121.500/mile

Landscaping along Residential Boulevards, such as the proposed widening of
Livernois, includes planting 132 small shade or ornamental trees in the boulevard
median and planting 132 small shade or ornamental trees on each side of the road
between the pathway and the road (396 trees total/mile). The estimate assumes
-90-

�a cost of $58.00/tree and an installation factor of 1.8/tree. Also included in the
estimate is installing hydro-seed or sod in the median at an estimated cost of
$80,000/mile. Installing grass in the median would likely be a part of any budget
to widen a road to a boulevard and, therefore, would be automatically funded. The
remaining landscaping improvements would require funding.
$140,SOQ,lmile

Michigan Boulevards

Landscaping along Michigan Boulevards, such as Walton Boulevard, includes
planting 88 large shade trees in the median and planting 88 large shade trees on
each side of the road in an easement area outside of the pathway (264 trees
total/mile). Again, large shade trees are estimated at a cost of $85.50/tree X 1.8
for installation. Because this median is wider, installing grass is estimated at
$100,000/mile. As with a residential boulevard, installing grass in the median
would likely be a part of the road widening project and would be covered in the
widening projects's budget. The remaining landscaping improvements would
require funding.

5.

Letter abbreviations have been used to represent possible funding sources for new
pathways and landscaping within the Interrelated Open Space System. Most of the
pathways now in place along major roads in the city have been funded through the
Pathway Fund. However, the current Pathway Fund has been depleted. Renewal
of the Pathway Fund by city residents will be key step in implementing this plan.
Some pathways have been installed by private development as the land adjacent
to the city's major roads is developed. This method of funding has been
aggressively pursued, were possible, and will continue to be the most desireable
way to fund the pathways.

6.

Funding the landscaping improvements described above could come from several
sources. Small amounts of money may be available through State or Federal
Grants and from private sources, such as donations. The most likely source of
funding would be the establishment of a new bond fund especially for landscaping
improvements along major roads. A new future "Landscape Bond Fund" would
require the approval of the residents of the city.

CllCE.5-SEX;I'ICNOF
PARKW\Y/PAlHNAY SYSfEM

FOR MIOIIGAN IDJLEVARilS

r

-91-

�--

TRANSITIONS
Ttansi tions between different land uses have a profound
effect on the aesthetic image of a community.
In a wel 1planned community,
there are pleasing transitions between
commercial and residential areas or between multiple-family
and single-family areas or other land use changes.
When transitions are abrupt, lacking, or poorly designed, there is a
displeasing visual result.
There are three primary ways in
which the planning commission can achieve desirable transitions between different adjoining land use areas in Rochester
Hills:
1) Through appropriate land use planning; 2) through
effective use of landscaped green spaces or buffers; and 3)
through carefully regulated site design.
A compatible and complementary arrangement of land uses
will create a visually pleasing impression.
For example, the
location of a residential development adjacent to a park or
open space area is a visually pleasing relationship.
The
placement of a commercial development directly within the
context of a single-family residential neighborhood would be
an extremely displeasing land use relationship. The first line
of attack in achieving effective land use transitions is
through correct placement of land uses in the overall land use
design of the city.
Most land use planning is based on
criteria of compatibility and disruptiveness.
The designer of
a land use pattern tries to achieve a balanced plan which
arranges the desired land uses in the most compatible and
least disruptive pattern.
Issues such as economic development, aesthetic quality, recreation opportunities, quality of
residential environment, or efficient traffic flow are usually
interpreted within the overall framework of the two considerations of compatibility and disruptiveness.

,

Land uses which are compatible can simply co-exist
comfortably near one another or they can reinforce one another
in a positive way.
An apartment complex and an office
development may co-exist compatibly, but will not have any
significant beneficial effect on one another.
An open space
area located adjacent to an apartment complex wi 11 have a
definite positive beneficial effect because of the recreation
opportunities and aesthetic enjoyment afforded to residents of
the apartment complex.
The beneficial relationship between
adjoining land uses can be one sided or the land uses may have
a reciprocally beneficial affect on each other.
The Rochester Hills Future Land Use Plan is based on a hierarchy of land
use compatibility relationships.
At one end of the hierarchy
are the most intensive or disruptive land uses and at the
other end are the least intensive or least disruptive land
uses.
The hierarchy is as follows:

-92-

�I
N

M
0
R

T
E
N

E

s
I
V
E

Heavy Industry
Restricted Industry
General Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
Office
Multiple-Family Residential
Single-Family Residential
Open Space

I
L
E

s
s

N
T
E
N

s
I
V

E

By arranging adjacent land uses based on the above
hierarchy, effective transitions will usually occur as one
travels from one land use area to another.
A second way of achieving effective transitions between
land use areas is the use of landscaped green spaces.
The
City of Rochester Hills has achieved some excellent results in
this regard.
There are many very fine examples in the city in
which the planning commission has required well-landscaped
green spaces between different land use areas.
Some of these
examples are illustrated in this section of the plan.
The
city's current landscape regulations are very stringent and
have been carefully drafted to achieve the optimum level of
green space transition effect between adjoining land uses.
A third approach to establishing transitions between
differing land use areas is through site design.
The planning
commission can review and regulate the layout of proposed
developments to improve the quality of transition between land
use areas.
For example, the placement and design of parking
areas has a great effect on the relationship between two
adjoining land use areas.
If a large parking lot for a
shopping center is improperly located or designed, it can have
a serious negative effect on an adjoining residential subdivision or multiple-family housing development.
The setback of
buildings from a major thoroughfare can affect the quality of
transition between land use areas.
Very often, a good effect
can be achieved by a more generous setback with abundant landscaping along the required green way.
It is recommended that
the city consider amending its subdivision ordinance to
increase the minimum greenbelt width along frontage abutting a
major thoroughfare.
Effective transition can also result from
the placement of buildings on the site.
For example, some
apartment developments in Rochester Hills have all garages
facing one side of a thoroughfare creating a negative visual
image on the adjoining land use area.
By varying the placement of garages and vehicular approachways throughout the
site, a more compatible visual relationship is created with
adjoining land use areas next to the apartment development.

-93-

�After the new master plan is adopted, it is recommended that
the city reevaluate its site design, building placement , and
setbacJc regulations in the zoning ordinance to determine if
modifications can be made which will achieve improved visual
transitions between land use areas.

,
,
,
,
-94-

�Examples of Transitions

This example on Rochdale shows the successful transition
from a multiple-family development into a single-family residential neighborhood.
The residential units toward the front
of the winding street are multiple-family units and the
dwellings to the rear of the street are single-family homes.
Because of the careful placement of the housing groupings on
this curved road, there is a satisfactory visual transition
between the multiple-family and single-family residential
groupings.

-95-

�"
The photographs on the following page show a welldesigned
transition
between
a
single-family
residential
neighborhood and an adjoining shopping center. The residences
in the top photograph face on Primrose Street.
The photo
shows the east side of the Mei jers Thrifty Acres commercial
property adjacent to the residential neighborhood.
A very
large 75 foot wide greenbelt has been provided between the
residential neighborhood and this shopping center complex.
The greenbelt has been bermed and planted generously with
Austrian Pines and various species of deciduous trees. As the
greenbelt trees mature, the screening effect between the two
adjoining land uses should be very satisfactory. The aesthetic image would have been better without construction of the
chain-link fence at the rear of the residential properties;
however residents probably desire the privacy and protection
to family and pets which the fencing provides.
It probably would not be possible to provide such a
generous buffering transition in all areas of the city in
which residential and commercial developments are located next
to one another.
However, the basic concept of a bermed grassy
greenbelt with evergreen shrubs is a desirable design feature
which could be adapted to other areas of the city on a smaller
scale if necessary.

-96-

�•
II

-97-

�•
This is an excellent example of a well-landscaped transition b~tween a single-family residential neighborhood and
Tienken Road, which is a major thoroughfare.
A 35 foot wide
greenbelt has been provided between the residential lots and
Tienken Road. The greenbelt is planted with a well-maintained
lawn.
Both deciduous trees and evergreen trees are liberally
planted on the greenbelt to provide a visually soft image.
A
handsome white painted wood fence is erected at the rear of
the residential properties where the greenbelt begins.

-98-

�•
RELATION OF BUILDINGS TO THE ENVIRONMENT

Proposed developments
in Rochester Hills
should be
related harmoniously to the use, scale , and architecture of
existing buildings in the vicinity that have a functional or
visual relationship to the proposed buildings.
Development in Rochester Hills should enhance the visual
quality of the city and the quality of life for its residents.
Visual quality is the result of the harmonious relationship among the various elements of the built environment
and with the natural environment.
In order to preserve and
enhance these qua! i ti es, it is the intent of this section of
the plan to identify the elements of design which affect the
subjective relationship between the existing architectural
fabric of the city and proposed new construction, and to
provide guidelines for insuring that new construction will add
to the visual quality of the city.
The intent here is NOT to discourage new and innovative
architectural forms, but instead to identify certain characteristics which
contribute to the overall
environmental
harmony of the city.
New architectural styles and building
technologies can be appropriate for the city as long as they
are not harshly discordant with the existing forms.

~

When preparing plans for design review, developers should
be cognizant of the interrelationships among buildings in the
area. Each building is more than a separate structure - it is
part of the total built environment.
A good design professional can fit a building into the existing environment,
especially major construction projects and facade renovations
involving a substantial change.
Recommended Approach to Architectural Review Process

It is recommended that developers submit building elevations of proposed structures to the planning commission for
architectural review simultaneously with submission of site
plans.
The planning commission can review architectural
design
proposals
based
on
the
premise
that
proposed
developments in Rochester Hills should acknowledge and respect
surrounding existing architecture.
Proposed buildings should
be visually related to their surroundings with respect to:
Scale
Materials, texture, and color
Rhythm of solids and voids
Spacing of buildings or signs
Open space and landscapes
-99-

�•
Street facade
Roof slopes
Fenestration
Intent

The intent of the architectural review process will be to
initiate a negotiation process with the applicant to obta i n
any necessary revisions to the building design which will make
it
more
compatible and
harmonious with
the surrounding
architectural character of the community.
The intent of the
architectural review process will be achieved through negotiation, not through ordinance requirements or enforcement.
The
revision of architectural drawings will be sought on a
voluntary basis as part of the total review and approval
process.
Procedure

The applicant will be asked to submit building elevations
for the front, side, and rear facades of each proposed structure.
An architectural review will be prepared for the
planning commission by either the planning department staff or
by the city's planning consultant.
This review document will
assist the planning commission in identifying possible areas
of architectural design change which would be desirable.
Based upon the professional design review, the plan commission
will determine its position in negotiating possible design
changes in the building design.
Several Michigan communities
have carried ,o ut this voluntary architectural design review
process for many years and the level of compliance has been
very high in virtually every community despite the fact that
the architectural review process is not actually based on an
ordinance or enforcement procedure.
As long as the review
process is reasonable and the aesthetic results are positive,
there is usually no opposition to such a review process.
Architectural Review Guidelines

The City of Rochester Hills zoning ordinance requires
that building design elevations be submitted with a site plan
approval application.
The submission of building design
elevations at the review stage provides an opportunity for the
planning commission to carry out an architectural review
process.
Many communities in Michigan engage in the architectural
review
of
such submissions.
The professional
planning staff and/or planning consultant can prepare a
critical
commentary
of
the
architectural
designs
for
consideration by the planning commission.
Usually,
the
aesthetic eval ua ti on of the architectural design is used to
make
recommendations
to
the applicant
for
modifying or
-100-

�II
improving the design of the proposed structure.
Most planning
commi&amp;sions make such recommendations in an advisory capacity
and they are usually not the basis for an actual denial of a
site plan.
In actual experience, most developers are willing
to make some modifications to their architectural designs on a
voluntary basis.
The process of architectural
review is
usually carried out within this spirit.
The design of proposed developments in Rochester Hills
should
acknowledge
and
respect
the
surrounding
existing
patterns of development,
and should be such that
those
desirable existing patterns are complimented and strengthened.
The following principles of architectural design are set
forth for use by the planning commission to use in evaluating
the aesthetic features of building design:
a.

,

Scale
A sense of scale directly relating to the surrounding
neighborhood should be provided.
The scale of a
building depends on its overall size, the mass of it in
relationship to the open space around it, and the sizes
of its doors, windows, porches and balconies.
The scale
gives a building "presence"; that is, it makes it seem
big or small, awkward or graceful, overpowering or unimportant.
The scale of a building should be visually
compatible with its site and with its neighborhood.

b.

Style
Architectural styles should be compatible with the character of the area and/or existing structures.

c.

Signage
Coordinated signage should be planned when
to facades or new buildings are designed.

d.

alterations

Rooflines
Cluttering
of
rooflines
as
a
result
of too many
different angles and roof pitches should be avoided.
A
roof can have a dramatic impact on the appearance of a
building.
The shape and proportion of the roof should
be visually compatible with the architectural style of
the building and with those of neighboring buildings.
Commercial building facades should not exhibit roof
elements which are visually out of proportion with the
other building design elements.

e.

Mechanical Equipment
Mechanical
equipment,
including
metal
chimneys,
at
grade, attached to, or on the roof of a building, should
-101-

�I
be screened from view; or they should be integrated into
tpe overall design of the building.
f.

II

•

Landscaping
Landscaping should be used to enhance the design and to
either strengthen or buffer the visual relationship with
surrounding areas.

g.

Rhythm of Solids and Voids
The rhythm of solids to voids in front facades should be
well-designed.
When you look at any facade of a building, you see openings such as doors or windows (voids)
in the wall surface (solid).
Usually the voids appear
as dark areas, almost holes, in the solid and they are
quite noticeable, setting up a pattern of rhythm.
The
pattern of solids and voids in the front facade of a new
or altered building should be visually compatible with
that of its neighbors.

h.

Proportions of Openings
The proportions of openings within the building should
be compatible with the overall design.
Windows and
doors come in a variety of shapes and sizes; even
rectangular window and door openings can appear quite
different depending on their dimensions.
The relationship of the height of windows and doors to their width
should be visually compatible with the architectural
style of the building and with that of its neighbors.

i.

Facade Materials
The relationship of facade materials is important to the
design integrity of a building.
The facades of a
building are what give it character, and the character
varies depending on the materials of which the facades
are made and their texture.
In Rochester Hills, many
different materials are used on facades - depending on
the architectural style of the building.
The facades of
a building, particularly the front facade, should be
visually compatible with those of other buildings around
it.
Building materials should be chosen carefully, and
it is generally more desirable to use as few differing
materials as possible.

j.

Site Elements
The size, placement, and materials of walls, fences,
driveways, and parking areas may have a visual impact on
a building.
These features should be visually compatible with the building and neighboring buildings.

•

-102-

�I

•

II

ENTRANCEWAYS
Entranceways to the City of Rochester Hills are a very
important
planning
issue.
There
are
approximately
27
thoroughfares which enter Rochester Hills from surrounding
communities.
About 18 of these thoroughfares are significant
because they carry a moderate to extensive number of motorists
in and out of the city each day.
Entranceways are important
because they create the first impression which a motorist has
when entering the city.
Efforts by the municipal government
to improve and maintain the visual appearance of the city's
entranceways are important for the following reasons:
1) An attractive entranceway contributes to
enjoyment of residents of the community.

the

aesthetic

2) Entranceways give the community identity and distinguish
it from surrounding communities.
3) Entranceways establish the character of Rochester
as a quality residential area.
4) Attractive entranceways help to enhance and
property values in the city's neighborhoods.

Hills

stabilize

The city should prepare and implement an entranceway
beautification program.
Design plans should be prepared for
beautifying and improving the appearance of each of the major
entranceways to the city.
Such a design plan would be
detailed in nature and is beyond the scope of this master
plan.
The design plan should recognize both the public and
private land ownership characteristics of each entranceway to
the city.
Entranceway beautification consists of more than
simply placing a welcome sign or shrubs near the entrance to
Rochester Hills.
A comprehensive ent~anceway beautification
program also addresses zoning and environmental controls on
properties which surround the entranceway.
There
are
three
basic
ways
in
which
entranceway
beautification can be planned and carried out:
1) Through a
municipal
landscaping
and
signage
program;
2)
through
effective zoning and environmental controls with particular
emphasis on adjacent woodlands and wetlands; and 3) through
negotiation with property owners at the predevelopment or
early site planning development stage when new developments
are being proposed adjacent to a major entranceway to the
city.
It is often possible to negotiate greenbelts, setbacks,
or other special landscape treatments which will make the
entranceway more attractive and also will complement the
adjoining private development.
The design plan for entrance-

-103-

�way beautification should set forth a detailed design for each
entranceway including signage and landscaping, zoning and
environfuental controls, and other features which will affect
the visual quality of the area.
Priorities should be
established among the various entranceways in this city and
funding sources should be identified so that the entranceway
beautification program can proceed on a systematic basis.
Each year the city should try to beautify a certain number of
entranceways .
An important component of entranceway beautification is
ongoing maintenance. After entranceways have been landscaped,
they need to be carefully maintained in order to continue to
look good.
The entranceway beautification program should be
carefully
coordinated
with
the
interrelated open
space
development concept which is also presented in this plan.
Attractive entranceways to the city will make an initial
"visual" statement which will then be picked up and continued
by the interrelated open-space system consisting of parkways,
boulevards, greenbelts, municipal parks, and other open-space
features.

'
-104-

�,.
,
,

Entranceway Examples
This entranceway to the City of Rochester Hills looking
east on Wal ton Boulevard as one leaves the City of Auburn
Hills is very handsomely designed.
The tasteful signage and
the lush evergreen shrubbery planted both in front and behind
the sign provide an aesthetically pleasing entranceway to the
city.

-105-

�This entranceway to
beautiful in its natural
on Orion Road as one
Rochester Hills.
The
magnificent mature trees
to the city.

the City of Rochester Hills is very
state.
This entrance to the city is
leaves Oakland Township to enter
curvature of the pavement and the
provide a very beautiful introduction

-106-

�REVITALIZATION OF THE OLDE TOWNE DISTRICT

,
J
J
f

In January of 1988, a revitalization plan was prepared
for the Olde Towne area;
however,
this plan was never
officially adopted or implemented .
Since 1988, several local
streets in the area have been paved and some of the commercial
store fronts have undergone renovation, but the area still
lacks an overall unified theme and has not come to grips with
the problem of off-street parking facilities.
Auburn
Road,
which
serves
the Olde Towne Shopping
District, is a State of Michigan highway.
The Michigan
Department of Transportation has long-range plans to widen the
existing two-lane pavement on Auburn Road.
If the thoroughfare is widened, it would wipe out parking in front of the
stores.
Merchants in the area are concerned that the
elimination of frontal parking could spell the economic doom
of the area.
If the section of Auburn Road serving Olde Towne
were transferred to local municipal control, state highway
regulations pertaining to removal of on-street parking would
no longer apply.
As part of preparation of the new master plan, a new
detailed on-site evaluation of urban design and development
issues in the Olde Towne area was completed. The results of
this field evaluation are presented in Figures D-IV, D-V, and
D-VI.
Based upon reevaluation of the 1988 plan and the recent
survey of the area, the following recommendations are made:
1) Consideration should be given to paving alleys behind the
business strips; 2) consideration should be given to development of a combination of parking both in front and behind
stores, as well as parking on some local streets which could
be closed; 3) a safe pedestrian crossing and circulation
system should be provided for school children and other pedestrians; 4) the revitalization strategy should include detailed
urban design and landscaping approaches; 5) a building facade
design theme should be defined based on a New England shopping
village concept; 6) zoning and landscaped green areas should
be used to demarcate the Olde Towne area and to prevent continuous strip development; 7) a uniform series of lettering
styles for commercial signage should be adopted for the
district; 8) merchants and surrounding residents should be
carefully and systematically consulted when exploring the
above recommendations.

-107-

�~

... ..

-~
w

'--l___j____Y

&lt;..9
0
0:::

a

BOAT SALBS

FULL SERVICE GAS STATION
Autos and Trucks Stored
Lot Without Screening
Poor Landscaping

_J

Un i que Structure on Auburn Road
(Variation of Ouonset Hut)
Fair to Good Condition
Lawn is Nice
Gravel Parking i n Front
Rear Building is a Ouonset Hut
that i s Rusted and Unsightly
(Blighting Influence)

co

---cf
--

£b

O:::
(..'.)

J]

□

RETAIL PIALL
Recent Contruction
Very Good Condition
Vacant Supermarket
Paved Parking
Good Lawn With Landscaping

0

&gt;

&lt;:{

LI

L__J

.._.I

W

11

M

VACATED BUILDING

Structure in Very Poor Condition
Weeds on Auburn Road
are Very Tall

tr

AUBURN

4\[ el I

.,.JlC

.

I

RBSIDBNCB
StructuC"e in
Good Condition
\
MATURE TREES LOCATtuON BOTH RESIDENTIAL
SHOULD BB PRESERVED

M

-

'\

uo

, } - LARGE VACA~TL~~=~ Busin::.Jess
Zoned B- on Both Auburn
Frontage
R Roads
and John

RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
Stcucture 1n
Poor Condition

LAWN PRODUCTS COPIPANY

Retail Use
Yard Screened
Metal Building in
Pair Condition
Very Good Landscaping

Figure 0-IV

VISUAL
IMPRESSIONS

\
\ •
VACANT BUILDING
\ \&gt;-- - - - Structure 1n Poor Condition
Blights Area
No Public Sidevalk on
~
t - -- Auburn Road

w
0

z

w

CD

"

PARTY STORR - NBWBR STRUCTURE
Paved Parking
Roadway Frontages are Landscaped
Building in Very Good Condition

I

-

r;i

AUTOflOTJVB USB
Truck/Trailer Rental
Automobile Repair
Cars and Rental Vehicles
Stored in Front on the Corner
No Screening o t YehicJes
Building in Poor to Pair Condition

z

□

CD

0

0:::

Ci]I tJIC

0:::

z

I
0
J

0

0
0
~

~

,...□

N

+

�..,~

~

~

~

,..

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___,..llf"-~IIIIIIPARTY STORE
New Facade Siding
Condition of Original
Structure Unknown

Parking on Auburn
and Longview Roads
Parking Areas Surfaced
With Gravel

ANI"AL HOSPITAL

---.

I

I

CARPET STORE
Newer Building
Gravel Parking in Front
and on West Side

Da

I

--. -=--- .__

AND COOLING BUSINESS/AUTO
SERVICE FACILITY

Renovated Facade on
Heating and Cooling Business
Paved Parking on Auburn Road

RENOVATED BUILDING

Lawn Maintenance Equipment

New Facade on

Parked Out Front

Original Structure
Original Structure is
in Fair Condition
Sides Need Painting

LI

I □-

Invokes a •colonial•

0

Image by the Use of
Windows With ears

and l'luntins
The Entrance Invokes

I

ROCHESTER HILLS
PRECINCT IS
Very Good Condition
Paved Parking
--,,-,--, D
I
RETAIL BUILDING

a •colonial• Image

□

J

Never Structure

::J

I

Very Good Condition
Paved Parking

I

.

ARTS SCHOOL
Poor to Faii: - Condition
Siding on Harrison
Packing on Auburn Road

._

I

PARTS SALES
in Good Condition
Trailers on
Along Auburn Road

OLDE TOWNE CORNERS - - - - - - - . . . .
S111all Strip Mall
Retail and Office Uses
Decorative Freestanding Laaps

I
f--'

•

Very Good Condition

Facade/Roof Very Good Condition
Sides Need Painting
Gravel Parking in Front

D

....

---,

on Culbertson (Has an Olde
Towne l ■age)
Brick Facade
Very Good Condition
Paved Parking

0

In Poor Condition

I.O

I

I

RETAIL OPERATION
Sales and Service
Very Good Condition
Good Landscaping
on Longview Road
Well Designed Paved
Parking Area
on Longview Road

GAZEB0 - - - - - - - - - - - • 8
Good Condition
No Walks Leading to It

N

+

BARBER SHOP
Building-in Poor Condition

l ._

REUTHER MIDDLE SCHOOL
Very Good Condition
Large Lawn on Auburn Road

Nev Facade
Ea~sed Du ■ pster on Bast Side of Building

....,

[1Cl

z

0

$'.

w

(/)

l-

Figure D-V

VISUAL
IMPRESS IONS

(/)

o::

w
m
_J
::)

u

-

- - - + - ---1

i11----11
w

&gt;
z

(9

Ig

,.... I

Pre-Fabricated Office
Building on Auburn
Road (Very Good Condition)
Tall Concrete Block
Production Building
in Rear
Lawn Adjacent to Auburn Road
Wood Furniture and
Products are Displayed
on the Lawn Adjacent
to Auburn Road
A Wood Stockage Fence Encloses
the Storage Yard Fronting on Both
Auburn and Longview Roads. The
Fence is in Fair Condition.

.

�._

......,

~ ·~

V .t'.W.

~

~

~

TWO AUTO RETA[L FAC[LITlES
PROPANE GAS SUPPLY-----i■
Sales of Auto Parts
Light Industrial Use
Paved Packing on Side (Vacated
Outdoor Storage of
Street) and Pront
Propane Tanks
Ouapsters at Rear
-----,-outdoor Storage Area is
Need Screening
{;:]
Not Screened Pro ■
Structures Ap~ear in
Auburn R?ad
Good Cond 1t 1 on
'"L I
It-'-- - - - ;,
Side Parking is provided by the
RESIDENCE
Vacated Eastern Avenue
Non-Retail Use

11111,1,

Non - Rctdil Use

Commonly Located in

RESTAURANT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

'

'

- - - ---.

Parking at Reac Surfaced
in Gravel
Structure in
Condition
Shingles are Needed on
Roof Fascia

Packing Acea is Sucfaced ---·· .....---Gravel and Unscreened
,..,__

I the Pcont Lawn '

1 II I I' I I I I
~

j

Area

I

Convenience Sto~e
Nice Lawn

~

11 111

CHUiJ,

I
I-'
I-'

CHURCH COIIPLEX
Includes School and Parking
One-Story Brfck With
D e r y Good Condition
Wide lletal Fascia foe
Non-Retail Use
the Roof Line
Packing in Pcont surfaced
With Loose Gcavel of
Moderate to Large Size
Needs Landscaping
NEW STRIP RETAIL USB
Brick With Sloped Roof
Vecy Good Landscaping and
_j
Parking Area
Lawn Along Auburn Road
(J)
(J)

OCJ

0

I

I
Vacant Acea Containing
Mature Trees and a
Moved Lavn

z II

RESIDENTIAL USE
Non -Retail Use
Newec Shingles
and Siding

z

0

(J)

0::
0::

&lt;t:
I

L--l
1 - --

D

[]

---1

11

0

......

w

D

z

0

z

_j

0::

0::

1--

l'.)

w

(J)

&lt;t:

w

t--- - - - -~

&lt;t:

w

:::j
w

w
I

t - -- - - - - 1

2
o--- - - - + - -

PARTY STORE
Older Building
Siding llay Cover Structural
Problems
Encroaches into Auburn
Road Right-Of-Way
Exposed Du ■ pstec
Along Auburn Road

I

Redesigned as a Self Service
Gas Station With

1
SHOE REPAIR FACILITY
Old, Concrete Bui1ing
Very S ■all

Il

I

I/

~ I
I t" I
. . . . . . LARGE GARDEN
~
Non-Retail

~NCR
~~
In P o o r ~ STATION AND
ONYENIENCE STOR
Rear Screeening
Poor_ Condition

LIi . J

t

INSURANCE AGENCY
Nev Roof and Siding
Asphalt Horseshoe Dcive
No Landscaping
Located at an Entrance
P(int Into the City

Needs Have Overrun

~ - ""''"--~II

CHURCH
.
Non -Reta1 l Use
In Good Condition
Pront Lawn Has Been
Overrun by Weeds
Parking in Reac

-7

BARBER SHOP
- -Newer Wood Siding
Packing Area Sucfaced in Gravel

r

Commercial Districts
In Poor Condition
Paved Parking on Auburn Road

TOOL CUTTER SERVICE
Light Industrial Use
Structure in Fair to
Good Condition

---, --,

Figure D-VI

VISUAL
IMPRESSIONS

RESTAURANT
Lawn and Lanscaping is Good
Paved Parking
Shaced Parking
With Retail/Office
Use to the West

c:.

w

0::
0

z

::)

0

w

0

ONE-STORY RETAIL BUILDING
OP RBCBNT CONSTRUCTION
(OFFICE USES CURRENTLY
INHABIT TOE SPACES}
Lawn is Good
T~ees are Lacking
Paved Parking
Shaced Packing With
Restaurant on the
Cocner of Auburn Road
and Dequindce

N

+

�Stylistic Compatibility

I
I

'J

The two buildings illustrated in figure D-VII are in the
Olde Towne Shoppinef District of Rochester Hills.
The building
on the right has been restored with a definite colonial architectural motif.
It is quite nicely designed.
The building on
the left does not follow a colonial motif; but has a fake
mansard-type roof which extends downward over the front half
of the building.
The fake mansard roof has large lettering
identifying the "A &amp; S Heating and Cooling" firm. Figure
D-VIII below shows how the redesign of the heating and cooling
store would make it compatible with the surrounding architecture.
If the Olde Towne revitalization program is to be
successful, it will be necessary that all renovation follow
the basic architectural motif which has been established for
the area.

Figure D-VII

Figure D-Vl I I
-111-

�-r
-

DETENTION AND RETENTION PONDS
A detention p'ond holds storm water, but has a means of
outflow so the water can be drained from the pond.
A
retention pond, by co~trast, has no outflow capability and the
water remains in the pond.
Most ponds in Rochester Hills are
detention-type ponds.
They have provision for outflow of
water.
Many of these ponds are visually unattractive.
They
often consist of a land depression surrounded by a rather
stark looking chain-link fence.
It is recommended that the
city zoning ordinance be revised to specifically require the
full landscaping and screening of such ponds.
One issue with
respect to landscaping of ponds is that of public safety.
There is concern that children could climb over fencing and
drown in the basins when they are at high water level.
However,
this
issue
can
be
addressed
through carefully
regulated
slope
and
depth
requirements
in
the
zoning
ordinance. By requiring gradual sloping of the sides of ponds
and specifying a maximum depth, drowning accidents can be
prevented.
The example below shows an attractively landscaped
detention pond in the city.

-112-

�Land Use

�Land Use
EXISTING LAND USE

A detailed lot-by-lot existing land use survey was completed as part of the preparation of this plan. The following land-use system was used in the survey:
1.

Single-Family
Residential
Single-family
detached
dwellings, including only the developed portions of
large parcels (i.e., the approximate area devoted to
buildings and lawn).
In cases where more than one
platted lot is under the same ownership, only those lots
occupied by structures and lawn are included.

2.

Two-Family Residential - Generally flats or duplexes.

3.

Multiple-Family
Residential
three or more dwelling units.

4.

Mobile Home Residential - Courts or parks where land has
been platted or parcelled to allow temporary or permanent storage of mobile homes, or independent uni ts
located beyond the limits of a mobile home park.

5.

Convenience Commercial - Includes the land area occupied
by retail and service facilities, and related off-street
parking which accommodates day-to-day convenience shopping and service needs.
Included in this category are
food and drug stores, personal services such as barber
shops, beauty shops, and local repair services such as
shoe repair, tailors, dry cleaner and laundromats.

6.

Comparison Commercial - Includes the land area occupied
by retail uses, and related off-street parking, offering
commodities which are normally purchased at infrequent
intervals and for which the consumer may shop around.
Individual uni ts included in this category are apparel
stores, shoe stores, furniture and appliance stores, and
department stores.

r
f

r

Structures

II

containing

11

7.

Office Commercial - Includes the land area occupied by
all types of individual office facilities and related
off-street parking.
Included in this group as offices
are real estate, medical, clerical, etc. Office facilities which are ancillary to commercial or industrial
uses are not included in this category.

8.

Automotive Commercial - Includes the
-:------...,..,----,,----by
retail
and service facilities
oriented,
i.e., gas service
automotive accessories, etc.
-113-

land area occupied
which are autostations,
tire stores,
This category does not

�r

include bump , and
industrial.

paint

shops

which

are

classified

as

9.

r
r
r
r

General Commercial - Includes the land area occupied by
those types of retail and service facilities,
and
related off-street parking,
which normally do not
requiie a shopping center location, and do not primarily
cater to the convenience needs of adjacent residential
areas.
Included in this category are such uses as
commercial lodging, restaurants, bowling alleys, and
drive-in theaters.

10.

r

Light Industrial - Includes the land area devoted to
those types of industrial manufacturing and nonmanufacturing uses which were not felt to exert primary
influence
on
adjacent
areas
or
parcels from
the
standpoint of scale of operation, type of operation,
commercial traffic, etc. Examples are warehousing, bump
and paint shops, and technological industries (radio
assembly) .

11.

Heavy Industrial - Includes the land area devoted to
those types of industrial manufacturing and nonmanufacturing uses which were considered to exert primary
influence on adjacent areas or parcels due to the scale
of operation, type of operation, commercial traffic,
etc.
Examples are plants which manufacture finished or
semi-finished products from raw materials and gravel
mining, gas processing, and junk yards.

12.

Landfill and Mining Operations
Landfills include
sanitary landfill operations. Mining includes gravel or
sand extraction operations.

13.

Public Elementary School - Land developed or owned by
the School District for elementary schools.
Elementary
schools are indicated with an
E on the Existing Land
Use Map for 1991.

r.

,

,
J
,
,

II

II

14.

Public Junior High School - Land developed or owned by
the School District for junior high schools. The Junior
High Schools are indicated by a 11 J 11 on the Existing Land
Use Map for 1991.

15.

Public Senior High School - Land developed or owned by
the School District for senior high schools. The Senior
Highs are depicted with an 11 S 11 on the Map.

16.

Other Public - Includes land owned by Federal, State,
County, or City government.
Examples are municipal
offices, parks, and post office, etc.
-114-

�r

17.

Quasi-Public
Land developed for private
utility purposes such as substations.

parks

18.

Churches and Institutional - Land developed
gious purposes, parochial schools, etc.

for

19.

Streets
and
Alleys
The
full
rights-of-way
designated on the Existing Land Use Map for 1991.

20.

Railroad Right-of-Way
Western Railroad.

21.

Special Purpose Uses - The land area devoted to Oakland
University, golf courses, riding stables, hospitals, and
similar uses.

22.

Lakes and Ponds - Water areas such as Galloway Lake and
the lake at Thelma Spencer Park.

23.

Floodplain and Rivers - The floodplain as delineated by
the Corps of Engineers reports on the Clinton River and
Paint Creek.

24.

Vacant - Platted and unplatted undeveloped land.

[

r
f
f

-

An example

and

rel ias

is the Grand Trunk

The results of the existing land use survey are shown in
Figure LU-I and Tables LU-1 , LU-2, and LU-3.
The master
plan adopted by the city in 1986 was not based on a current
existing land use survey;
that plan utilized a land use
survey completed in 1980.
Table LU-2 portrays changes in
land use which have occurred between the 1980 survey and the
1991 survey.
The category of land use which showed the largest
acreage increase during the 11 year period between the two
surveys was single-family residential.
In 1980, the city had
4,953.6 acres of developed single-family residential land and
by 1991, 1,955 additional acres had ·been added.
This
represents a 39.5 percent increase. Multiple-family residential development also showed a substantial increase during
the 11 year period; in 1980 the city had 438. 5 acres of
multiple-family development and by 1991 the city added 348.7
acres of multiple-family development, indicating a 79.5 percent increase.
The city has two mobile home developments
which evidenced a 21.1 percent increase in acreage due to
build out during this period.
All categories of commercial land use increased substantially in the period between 1980 and 1991.
Comparison
commercial facilities showed the largest increase with 123.7
percent, followed by convenience commercial with an increase
-115-

�r

0
0
0

E
f

SINGLE
TWO

,

I

OAKLAND

UNIVERSITY

ii~
~1

~-~
~Ii:;,._~-::.'
~

RESIDENTIAL

FAMILY

MOBILE

~
~

RESIDENTIAL

FAMILY

MULTIPLE

e

S T E R

FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL

HOME

RESIDENTIAL

CONVENIENCE

COMMERCIAL

••
•
•

COMPARISON

COMMERCIAL

9

PUBLIC

ELEMENTARY

~
~
~
@

PUBLIC

JUNIOR

HIGH

SCHOOL

PUBLIC

SENIOR

HIGH

SCHOOL

~

•

COMMERCIAL

OFFICE

AUTOMOTIVE

COMMERCIAL

GENERAL

COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL

LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL

HEAVY

OTHER

PUBLIC

QUASI

PUBLIC

SCHOOL

( CHURCHES , ETC . )

INSTITUTIONAL

@

SPECIAL

PURPOSE

0

VACANT

OR

AGRICULTURAL

:-:-_:::, FLOODPLAIN

... _,_. i
;,,,
•

:·,;

;
~:i,.

.

"::J
SUPPLEMENTARY

SYMBOLS

C CEMErERY
W WELL SITE

f FIRE

STATION

Figure LU-I

\

EXISTING
LAND USE
City of

QOCHESTER HILLS
OAKLAND

COUNTY • MICHIGAN

ROCHESTER

HILLS

PLANNING COMMISSION

A
Grn-\1 nLl 11 &gt;1n 1,nAw1&lt;1~1E~
•

'

J

�'
TABLE LU-I
EXISTING LAND USE - 1991

~

._.

LAND USE CATEGORY

ACREAGE

Single-Family Residential
Two-Family Residential
Multiple-Family Residential
Mobile Home Residential

6,925.3
1.6
787.2
197.l

33.1%

ACREAGE

DEVELOPED AREA
PERCENT OF TOTAL
43.6%

0.9

6,925.3
1.6
787.2
197.l

. *·*
5 .o
1.2

*·*
3.8

Convenience Commercial
Comparison Commercial
Office Commercial
Automotive Commercial
General Commercial

90.3
210.7
70.l
75.7
173.8

0.4
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.8

90.3
210.7
70.l
75.7
173.8

0.6
1.3
0.4
0.5
1.1

Light Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Landfills and Mining Operations

620.2
80.9
214.2

3.0
0.4
1.0

620.2
80.9
214.2

3.9
0.5
1.3

Public Elementary Schools
Public Junior High Schools
Public Senior High Schools
Other Public Uses

101.5
150.0
93.5
948.7

0.5
0.7
0.4
4.5

101.5
150.0
93.5
948.7

0.6
0.9
0.6
6.0

Quasi-Public
Churches or Institutional
Streets and Alleys
Railroad Right-of-Way
Special Purpose Uses

1,352.7
135.l
2,523.9
63.0
1,078.3

6.5
0.7
12.l
0.3
5.2

1,352.7
135.l
2,523.9
63.0
1,078.3

8.5
0.9
15.9
0.4
6.8

Lakes and Ponds
Floodplain and Rivers
Vacant

139.8
256.8
4,622.7

0.7
1.2
22.l
15,893.8

100.0%

-...J

I

TOTAL CITY AREA
PERCENT OF TOTAL

TOTAL

*·* ·LESS

20,913.1
THAN 0.1 PERCENT

100.0%
Source:

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

�...

11111
TABLE LU-2
ACREAGE CHANGE COMPARISON
1980 SURVEY*

1991 SURVEY

ACREAGE
CHANGE

PERCENT
CHANGE

4,953.6
2.4
438.5
200.4

6,925.3
1.6
787.2
197.1

+1,971.7
-0.8
+348.7
-3.3

+39.8%
-33.3
+79.5
.:.1.6

Convenience Commercial
Comparison Commercial
Office Commercial
Automotive Commercial
General Commercial

57.4
94.2
51.0
66.0
125.8

90.3
210.7
70.1
75.7
173.8

+32.9
+116.5
+19.1
+9.7
+48.0

+57.3
+123.7
+37.5
+14.7
+38.2

Light Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Landfills and Mining Operations

182.4
61.4
244.2

620.2
80.9
214.2

+437 .8
-30.0

+240.0
+31.8
-12.3

Public Elementary Schools
Public Junior High Schools
Public Senior High Schools
Other Public Uses

97.5
162.1
48.1
402.5

101.5
150.0
93.5
948.7

+4.0
-12.1
+45.4
+546.2

+4.1
-7.5
+94.4
+135. 7

Quasi-Public
Churches or Institutional
Streets and Alleys
Railroad Right-of-Way
Special Purpose Uses

958.3
70.5
2,246.0
81.0
983.1

1,352.7
135.1
2,523.9
63.0
1,078.3

+394.4
+64.6
+277 .9
-18.0
+95.2

+41.2
+91.6

Lakes and Ponds
Floodplain and Rivers
Vacant

119.0
375.3
8,892.4

139.8
256.8
4,622.7

+20.8
-118 .5
-4,286.8

+17.5
-31.6
-48.2

20,913.1

20,913.1

LAND USE CATEGORY
Single-Family Residential
Two-Family Residential
Multiple-Family Residential
Mobile Home Residential

I
I-'
I-'

CD

I

TOTAL

+19 .5

+12.4

-22.2
+9.7

*The 1980 acreage figures are
exclusive of annexation.
Source:

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

�__..
--

.
TABLE LU-3
EXISTING LAND USE COMPARISON:

1973, 1980, AND 1991

PERCENT OF
TOTAL AREA

1973
PERCENT OF TOTAL
DEVELOPED AREA

PERCENT OF
TOTAL AREA

1980*
PERCENT OF TOTAL
DEVELOPED AREA

Residential

18.8%

46.6%

26.8%

Commercial

1.1

2.7

Industrial

0.9

Public or Quasi-Public

PERCENT OF
TOTAL AREA

1991
PERCENT OF TOTAL
DEVELOPED AREA

48.6%

37.8%

49.7%

1.8

3.4

2.9

3.9

2.1

1.2

2.1

3.4

4.4

3.4

8 .1

8.3

15.l

13.3

17.6

Special Purpose Uses

5.5

13.7

4.7

8.5

5.2

6.8

Land Extraction or Fill

2.2

5.7

1.2

2.1

1.0

1.3

Rights-of-Way

8.5

21.1

11. l

20 . 2

12.4

16.3

LAND USE CATEGORY

-

-

I
I-'

~

I

Vacant, Floodplain
and Water

59.6

44.9

24.0

-TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

*The 1980 figures indicate percentages of
land area exclusive of annexation.
Source:

Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

100.0%

�f
of 57.3 percent, general commercial with an increase of 38.2
percent, office commercial with an increase of 37.5 percent,
and automotive commercial which increase of 14.7 percent.
Light industrial land use is the land use category which
showed the largest percentage increase in the 11 year period
between the two surveys.
In 1980, the city had 182 .4 acres
of light industrial use and in 1990 it had 620.2 acres which
represents a 240 percent increase. Heavy industrial land use
increased during the same period by 31.8 percent.
The area
devoted to landfills and mining operations actually decreased
by 12.3 percent based on the 1991 survey. This reduction was
not due to the actual elimination of land fills, but due to
an error contained in the 1980 land use survey which
represented certain areas as land fill. This error has been
corrected in the 1991 survey.
During the past 11 years, the amount of land devoted to
elementary, junior, and senior high schools showed modest
increases.
The amount of land in the city utilized for
public parks showed a substantial increase during this same
period.
In 1980, public uses other than schools occupied
402. 5 acres, by 1991 these uses occupied 946. 3 acres indicating a 135.1 percent increase.
Churches and institutional
land uses increased by 91. 6 percent in the 11 year period.
Both railroad rights-of-way and flood plain and river areas
showed decreases between the two surveys.
A portion of the
former railroad right-of-way has been turned into a recreational pathway as part of the Paint Creek Trail. Areas which
were formerly classified as flood plain and river have been
included in various adjoining residential developments and
have been reclassified resulting in a reduction of 31.6
percent in this category.
Examination of Table LU-3 shows that Rochester Hills is
predominately a
residential community with 38. 0 percent of
the city's total land area devoted to this use.
The second
largest land use are areas classified as vacant, flood plain,
or water which represent 23.9 percent of the total land use
area.
The third largest land use category in the city is
public or quasi-public with 13. 2 percent of the total area
devoted to this use.
Other land uses, although they may have substantial
impact in terms of traffic and economic benefits, actually
occupy a relatively small portion of the total land use area.
Commercial land uses occupy only 2. 9 percent of the city's
total land area, industrial land uses occupy 3. 4 percent,
special purpose uses occupy 5.2 percent, and land extraction
or fill operations occupy approximately l percent of the
city's total land area. Rochester Hills is primarily a lower
density residential community with viable commercial, indus-

P.

-120-

�trial, and public land-use components.
As the city nears
build-out, it . should mature as a stable and very desirable
residential community.
It has been and wi 11 continue to be a
desirable place in which to live.

J
J
f

r

r
-121-

�FUTURE LAND USE PLAN

The Future Land Use Plan is portrayed in Figure LU-II.
Table LU-4 inqicates the quantities of each proposed land use
within the total city.
The Future Land Use Plan is the
culmination of a planning process which was initiated by the
Planning Commission over a year ago.
The Planning Commission
has consulted with numerous neighborhood organizations, city
departments and commissions, and other community city groups
in development of the adopted Future Land Use Plan.
Land use planning is a process which determines the most
desirable spacial relationships of future land uses through
an assessment of past, present, and future determinants.
It
is also concerned with strategies for achieving such relationships.
The future land use planning process is directed
toward developing and maintaining a wholesome environment for
the residents of Rochester Hills.
Therefore, the people of
the community
their needs, wants, and interests -- are the
prime concern of the future land use planning process.
Each land use decision reflected in this plan was
carefully analyzed by the planning consultant and planning
staff and thoroughly studied and discussed by the Planning
Commission at open public meetings.
A public hearing on the
master plan was held on March 17, 1992 and required public
notices were published in the Rochester Clarion in accordance with the provisions of Public Act 285 of the Public
Acts of 1931, the Municipal Planning Act.
Having been duly
adopted by the Planning Commission on March 31, 1992, an
attested copy of the Master Land Use Plan has been forwarded
to the Oakland County Planning Commission and certified to
the city council and the Oakland County Register of Deeds.
Subsequent to adoption of this master plan, the City of
Rochester Hills Planning Commission will continue to keep the
Land Use Plan and zoning regulations of the city updated.
The zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, land development ordinances, and applicable codes will implement the
plan. The plan has been designed to be a reasonable and well
thought-out guide for decision making on future land development.
Residents of Rochester Hills and investors in the
community can look to the plan as a document designed to
protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
community.
The plan should also provide stability in future
planning and zoning decision making in the city.
The Future Land Use Plan is based on the premise that
Rochester Hills is primarily a single-family residential
community.
The residential neighborhoods are delineated, to
a large degree, by the original major street network which
was established when Rochester Hills was still Avon Township.

-122y-

�r
~

TABLE LU-4
FUTURE LAND USE ACREAGE

LAND USE CATEGORY

ACREAGE

PERCENT
OF TOTAL

10,278 . 3
224.7
821. 7
197.1

49 . 2%
1.1
3. 9
0.9

Residential
Single-Family
Cluster Housing
Two-Family or Multiple-Family
Mobile Home
Commercial
~

Convenience or Comparison
Automotive Service Oriented
Office
Research Office

538.9
84.0
148.8
37.7

2.6
0.4
0.7
0.2

229.5

1.1

971.5
44.6

4.6
0.2

102 . 4
83.3
150.0
93.5
1,375.7
15.3
710.1
1,082 . 1
194.0
7.4
6.8
274.3
139.8
3,038.6
63.0

0. 5
0.4
0.7
0.5
6.6
0.1
3.4
5.2
0. 9

Mixed-Use
Non-Residential Mixed-Use
Industrial
Light Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Public and Quasi-Public
Existing Elementary School
School Property or Option
Junior High School
Senior High School
Local Recreation
Regional Recreation
City-Wide Recreation
Special Purpose
Floodplain
Civic Center
Fire Station
Cemetery
Lakes and Ponds
Streets and Alleys
Railroad Right-of-Way
TOTAL

20,913.1

*·* Less than 0.1 percent

-

l

-124-

*·*
*·*

1.3
0.7
14.5
0.3

100. 0%

�~,

~

~

TABLE LU-5
FUTURE ACREAGE CHANGE COMPARISON BETWEEN
THE 1986 AND 1992 MASTER PLANS

1992 ACREAGE

ACREAGE
CHANGE

PERCENT
CHANGE

11,861.7
119.3
823.1
205.2

10,278.3
224.7
821.7
197.1

-1,583.4
+105.4
-1.4
-8.1

-13.3%
+88.3
-0.2
-3.9

13,009.3

11,521.8

-1,487.5

-11.4%

662.4
73.1
204.0
40.0

538.9
84.0
148.8
37.7

-123.5
+10.9
-55.2
-2.3

-18.6%
+14.9
-27.1
-5.8

979.5

809.4

-170.1

-17.4%

o.o

229.5

+229.5

Light Industrial
Heavy Industrial

1,098.3
202.4

971.5
44.6

-126.8
-157.8

-11.5%
-78.0

SUMMARY

1,300.7

1,016.1

-284.6

-21.9%

LAND USE CATEGORY

1986 ACREAGE

Residential
Single-Family
Cluster Housing
Two-Family or Multiple-Family
Mobile Home
SUMMARY
Commercial
Convenience or Comparison
Automotive Service Oriented
Office
Research Office
I
I-'

IV

SUMMARY

u,
I

Mixed-Use
Non-Residential Mixed-Use
Industrial

Note:
Differences in future land use between the 1986 and 1992
master plans are due to:
(1) actual increases or decreases in the
amount of land uses planned; (2) the redesignation of certain land
use areas to the right-of-way classification; (3) the introduction
of new land use categories; (4) increases in the amount of land
used for detention ponds and local recreation ; (5) increases in the
amount of school property; and (6) transference of public property
such as regional park land being acquired by the city.

�-,

~

TABLE LU-5 CONTINUED
FUTURE ACREAGE CHARGE COMPARISON BETWEEN
TIIE 1986 ABO 1992 MASTF.Jl. PLANS
LAND USE CATEGORY

1986 ACREAGE

1992 ACREAGE

ACREAGE
CHANGE

PERCENT
CHANGE

Schools
Existing Elementary School
School Property or Option
Junior High School
Senior High School

-

80.8
95.0
43.8
48.1

102.4
83.3
150.0
93.5

+21.6
-11.7
+106.2
+45.4

+26.7%
-12.3
+242.5
+94.4

267.7

429.2

+161.5

+60.3%

520.0
191.5
289.8

1,375.7
15.3
710.l

+855.7
-176.2
+420.3

+164.6%
-92.0
+145.0

1,001.3

2,101.1

+l,099.8

+109.8%

2,496.5
81.0

3,038.6
63.0

+542.1
-18.0

+21.7%
-22.2

2,577.5

3,101.6

+524.1

+20.3%

Special Purpose
Floodplain
Civic Center
Fire Station
Cemetery
Lakes and Ponds

1,072.5
375.3
98.0
2.5
109.8
119.0

1,082.1
194.0
7.4
6.8
274.3
139.8

+9.6
-181.3
-90.6
+4.3
+164.5
+20.8

+0.9%
-48.3
-92.4
+172.0
+149.8
+17.5

SUMMARY

1,777.1

1,704.4

-72.7

-4.1%

20,913.1

20,913.1

SUMMARY
Recreation
Local Recreation
Regional Recreation
City-Wide Recreation
SUMMARY
I

......
N

°'I

Rights-of-Way
Streets and Alleys
Railroad Right-of-Way
SUMMARY
Other Public and Quasi-Public

TOTAL

Source: Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated

�The 36 square mile township, which included the City of
Rochester, was divided into residential development modules
or neighborhoods by a street gridiron pattern based on the
concept of major thoroughfares located approximately one mile
apart.
From
east
to
west,
there
were
six
major
thoroughfares: Adams, Crooks, Livernois, Rochester, John R,
and Dequindre.
From north to south, there were seven major
thoroughfares which include: Dutton, Tienken, Walton, Avon,
Hamlin, Auburn, and South Boulevard.
These 13 basic streets
formed
the
original
gridiron
pattern
which,
in turn,
delineated the residential modules or neighborhoods which
comprise the city's development pattern. The Future Land Use
Plan has been designed to carefully protect the environmental
quality of each of the city's residential neighborhoods.

The major thoroughfare
network which defines
land use was established
during the early days of
Avon Township.

r

Single-family neighborhoods are defined by the
major thoroughfare system based on a one-mile
grid pattern. Non-residential uses are usually
located on the periphery
of the neighborhoods .

r

The city has exercised considerable care in its past
planning and zoning to ensure that multiple-family, commercial, and other non-residential uses are limited to the
periphery of major single-family areas, or are located at the
intersection of major thoroughfares.
Most of the sing lefamily
residential
neighborhoods consist of curvilinear
-127-

�street patterns which intersect with the main mile road
gridiron • pattern of arterial
streets .
Multiple-family
developments have been located on the edge of single-family
neighborhoods or have been situated where they provide a
transition between commercial or office uses and adjoining
single-family residential areas.
Many large single-family
development areas in the city contain internal open space or
recreation/park areas which have either been develop~d by the
city or have been developed as a result of the residential
subdividing process.

r
r
r
r
r

Most multiple-family residential developments in Rochester Hills are of large size ranging between 5 acres and 190
acres in size.
The majority of multiple-family developments
are located within a portion of the city located between
Livernois on the west and John R on the east. Multiplefamily developments have been carefully planned so that they
do not interfere with or create traffic intrusions into
single-family residential neighborhoods.
Several multiplefamily residential developments act as transitions between
shopping centers and nearby single-family residential subdivisions.
Areas planned for industrial development in Rochester
Hills historically have been located along the Grand Trunk
Railroad right-of-way, in proximity to M-59, and to a lesser
degree, in the area near Hamlin and Dequindre.
These industrial development areas originally needed access to rail
service, but eventually the linkages to M-59 and the other
major arteries of the city's transportation system became
more important to their economic viability than did the
railroad.

The economic corridors
containing
industrial
and commercial developments follow Rochester
Road and the Grand Trunk
Rai l road corridor .

-128-

�Major commercial development areas in Rochester Hills
have beed carefully planned so that they are located at major
intersections.
The major commercial development concentrations in the city are located at Rochester and Auburn,
Rochester and Hamlin, Rochester and Avon, Livernois and
University, Walton and Adams, and Tienken and Rochester.
Secondary commercial areas are located at M-59 and Dequindre,
at Auburn and John R, at A~burn and Dequindre, and a ~ Crooks
and Auburn.
Many of the commercial areas contain transitional off ice development areas which provide a transition
between the commercial area and adjoining multiple-family or
single-family development areas.
Although Rochester Hills
has a substantial amount of planned shopping center development, the city has a relatively limited amount of strip
commercial development.
The city's past planning and zoning
practices have carefully regulated strip commercial development and prevented a continuous pattern of strip development
along most major arteries.
The Future Land Use Plan
recommends commercial development only at already established
commercial development "nodes" or concentrations.
No new
major commercial areas are recommended.

Commercial
facilities
are strategically located at major transportation intersections.

The Future Land-Use Plan recommends that non-residential
mixed-use development areas be planned in the southwest portion of the city between Adams and the Grand Trunk Railroad
and in the northeast portion of the city east of the
Rochester/Tienken intersection. The non-residential mixed-use
category includes the following uses:
office,
research/
-129-

�office, light-industrial, hotel/motel, and certain commercial
uses whi•ch are functionally and physically related to the
above uses such as restaurants and office supply stores.
The
non-residential
mixed-use
category
does
not
include
development of heavy industrial uses, residential development, and commercial uses which are not related to the
primary permitted uses.
Performance standards for regulating
specific developments within the non-residential mixed-use
category will be developed as part of the city's zoning
or_dinance.
The master plan sets forth the concept of
mixed-use development, and subsequent zoning regulations will
further detail the objectives of these land-use areas of the
city.
The area bounded by John R, Avon, Dequindre, and Hamlin
has been utilized for many years for various land fill operations.
Within this area were included: the s.o.c.R.R.A.
Landfill;
Six-Star Landfill: Kingston Landfill;
Jones &amp;
Laughlin Landfill;
Sand-fill,
Incorporated Landfill,
MAL
Enterprises Landfill; and the City of Highland Park Woodfill
site . . Within this area, it is impossible to precisely
delineate areas which cannot be developed due to former
landfill operations unless expensive, detailed engineering
studies are performed for each site.
Therefore, the master
plan recommends that certain land areas be designated for
single-family residential or light industrial development
subject to completion of detailed engineering and environmental studies for each development proposal for the area.
It is also recommended that certain private and public
recreation uses be permitted in this area subject to special
approval.
Such recreation facilities could include golf
courses,
ski
lodges,
theme
parks,
nature
study areas,
arboretums,
exercise
clubs,
tennis
clubs,
and
lighted
baseball complexes.
The regulation of single-family residential and light
industrial land uses will be accomplished primarily through
revision of the city's zoning ordinance.
The new zoning
ordinance will need to set forth specific standards for
engineering and environmental studies which will be required
before any development proposal can be approved within this
area of the city.
The master plan recommends that the city
pursue state and federal funding to initiate demonstration
projects to reclaim and recycle former landfill sites in the
city.
The purpose of the demonstration projects will be to
actually help remove pollutants from the soil as well as to
serve as a laboratory for study by other communities in
Michigan and nationally.
The city should encourage formation
of
a
regional
initiatives
consortium
including
local
universities to implement this approach.

-130-

�The City of Rochester Hills adopted a ~aster Recreation
Plan in March of 1990 which sets forth a long-range program
for acqu~sition and development of park and recreation
facilities in the city.
This previously adopted plan has
been carefully reviewed for compatibility with the new master
plan and is considered to be an integral part of the master
planning process of the city.

Recreation
facilities
are
well
distributed
throughout the city. The
system
of
recreation
facilities consists of
facilities operated by
both the city and the
school systems.

-131-

�Utilities

�Utilities
The ultimate population or "build-out" capacity of a
community is directly related to the availability of public
utilities.
Drainage throughout the city is handled with
retention and detention on site, and major drains located
within major thoroughfares.
The City of Rochester f:J i l ls is
currently involved in providing water and sewer service to
its residents, businesses, and industries.
Individual developments are required to retain or detain surface runoff on
their own sites until the water can be discharged at the
natural agricultural runoff rate.

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
The map on the next page indicates that most of the City
of Rochester Hills is served with a public water system.
Rochester Hills is connected to the overall City of Detroit
system and the only area that does not yet benefit from the
system is the extreme northeast area of the city. Watermains
range in size from six inches to thirty inches.
Also
depicted are valves and wells, hydrants, pressure reducing
valves, and the pressure district limits.

SANITARY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Similar to the water distribution system, only a few
areas in the northeast and east portions of the city are not
served by sanitary sewer facilities.
The main facility that
serves the city is the Clinton-Oakland Interceptor which
parallels the Clinton River.
Another interceptor, known as
the MSVO Interceptor, also serves the city.
The Sanitary
Distribution System Map follows the Water Distribution Map.
It indicates the services of sanitary mains traversing the
city and ranging in size from eight inches to thirty-six
inches.
The Clinton-Oakland Interceptor ranges in size from
forty-two to sixty inches in size.
The Paint Creek Interceptor located to the north of the City of Rochester is
fifty-four inches in size.

-132-

�WATER
D ISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM
CITY OF
~

ROCHESTER
HILLS

OAKLAND

COUNTY , MICHIGAN

£n11lneer(A• ~pa.rtment

.,,, ............ . IOCJanu,~...__,

............
.............,_,

....... OU, .... . . . . .

-.
...-:-..,

--·
17=-~.M.
-

COMC'Tl0N to

cm"

----

!El

LEGEND

j

/

----------·
--------

1• WATUI 1WN
1• WATDIIIUMII

ll"•mt .....

; \_,,~

•••fflMAIC

'lll•m"'"'
'l;('•T'PIWII
»-•TIJIIMIM

'Ml.wa-...

-ta

- · - · ..,.ow_,_

-

...V', • . . . , . _ , _

..•.
~

-Oft'IIIICTI.Jllm
H'raUIIUC -11.&amp;YfflON
-lUW,TIC,,

ITATIC Plll'STATION

~

.

,. -

C'-1.~I

i

-A
l.

IC NICA'lt.S ~ T a..omt

Figure U-I

JOHNSON 6 Nl)EJt90N INC.

_,,...__
°"'"""'

CQllllU'N

CWlllltilfff : UJ&amp;.

_ _ ,m

QaDCIDff : dlL

�SAl\llTARV
CISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM

CITY OF
ROCHESTER HILLS
ENGINEERING DEPT.

OAKLAND COUNTY •

MICMIOAN

LEGEND
1s--..r11'W\t
"'walllTM'M't
llSlllaill'fUMt
ll~Mwte

,,j=:::
......., ......

,, lolNal'FU.WU

,,........,.HMt

•

J•

~w:wu

~ MWfl
•t•MC\,aOIII 0MUN0 .mlN:ll'IIQt

',

'I

·-

U

~

(

'

U • II•

7: .

!
i
\. .

-': i

.,,..-

.I

,.
-;/,-

-

~

...

,,_. ("P INIIIOMW
. . . . .AflON

••OWiMt•

Figure U-II

__,

.a-

\

~•-...-..
. ,...... ,

�·gsn pUB( gJn1nJ JOJ UB[d B do[gA;}p 01 gsn PUB[ put~4lMOJ~
UO!lB[ndod U! spugJl 4l!M P!U(JdAO gJB UO!S !WWO:) ~u!UUV.[d ;}41 Aq pgdoygAgp sgP!!Od

·142µ ;}41 UO h\O(;:iq U,\'\OljS S! '-ll!H .l;}lSd4.JO~ JO /11:)
gq1 JOJ 1suJ;:i10J 1Ugw,{01dwg gql ·1ugwfo1dwg JO s1su:,gJoJ J!pop;:id p;:idoJgA;:ip os1n D0:)1.-\J3S
·ppow Jg1ndwo::, s .DO::&gt;W3S Aq pg1::,gfo1d s;:isBgJ:Ju! 2u!s no4 puu uonu1ndod ;:i41 s1sn
lJ;}I ;:i41 uo Mor;:iq grqm gqi ·(oo::&gt;W3S) s1UgwwgAoo 10 I!::,uno::&gt; uu2!l!J!W 1sugtnnos gq1
,&lt;q pgdo1gAgp suo!1::,g fo1d uo9u1ndod sgzm1n Al!:J ;:iq1 'ssg::,oJd 8u!uu u1d g41 ;}Jl?l!l~JP.J oi

0

s&gt; ■
%~%8

asn pue1

owe

os·c::

608'~8

C::i::S'6L

/4ipede:)

ccL'a;

000c

os·c:

006'08

c06'cL

0~0i'.:

96~'oc

( 'lSa) 066 ~

c92'L

v·o

L6Z'S6Z'6

ue614:i1~

vc·si

,·L

Z6S'C80' ,

AJUno::, pue1~eo

vv·sc ■

9'8

1'88'GL

vs·sv ■

6'L

LZZ'8 ·

osz

S99'8v

0 ,,

9L0'H

SIJ!H UJnQn'I:(

o· ,-

08,'L

J8JS84:JOtf

g· ;g

99L' ,9

+99 .

·sgpl:l::,gp OMl lS'El[ g41 Jgi\Q uo9n10Ag S,Al!Unwwo::, gql g11msnrn
spu4::, ~U!MO(!OJ g4.1 'lU;)WdOpAgp [B!J1Snpu! pue [B!:JJgmwo::, JO s1unOWB 8u91oddns "4llBg4
41!M Al!unwwo::, (B!Jugp!sgJ use 8u!8Jgwg S! Al!:J g4J. ·gsn puur JO UJg11ed s ,AlP g41 01 sg~m~q::,
)UB:J!J!U8!S pgsne::, S,0861 g41 8U!Jnp UO!ltqndod S.Al!:J g41 Ll! gsBgJ:JU! :J!lBU11Up gqJ.
Lvc·ss

Li ·9

~ 0009G

UOIIDQIJlSIO

aov

066,·086,

I\OJ.L
d14suMOJ. pue1~eo
d!4SUM01 AqJ94S

89'C::

C::6~ LG

SS8'L9

000C::

066,

a6ue40 %

(1enioe)
9L'c

(1enpe)
1
8S8 i'.:i'.:

(1enpe)
99L' 19

(1enpe)
066~

s1se:iaJo::11uaw401dwJ

-

·ugJP[!lP pg2u-yooq::,s 4l!M Sl{npB gJ!I-P!W JO AJ!J
-l?Ul!Jd pgsodwo::, S! Al!:J gql 'sg1B11snm 11u4::, ::i41 sv '0661 U! UO!lnqplS!P g2u S.A1!Unwwo::, g41
JO 1oqsduus B S! 1q2p gq1 uo MO[::iq lJU4:J gqJ. 'lJUd B S! SII!H J~nsg4:JOt{ 4:J!4M JO 'sugm :J!4du.12
-o::i2 1g81u1 g41 pun sgmunwwo::, ~upoqy~!gu 01 41Mo12 puB uopBfndod s,,&lt;1p g41 sgJBdwo::,
lPI ;)ljl uo MO(::iq gyqu1 gql ·ugJB l!011::ia UBHIOdOJl::lUJ g41 U! sgsugJ:JU! ::i2B1ug::,1gd 1sg21u1 ::i41
JO guo SBM S!4l 'PBJ UJ 'lU;}:)Jgd l~ JgAo JO gsB;}J:JU! U'El S! 4::,14M ' 99L' l 9 01 UMOJ8 pBlj 1! 0661
Aq pun 6LL'0v SBM (d!4SUM0l UOAV m1s ;}W!} g41 lP.) UO!lBp1dod S,Al!:J g41 '086 l UJ '0661
pm: 086 l uggMJgq 4lMOJg UO!JB{ndod P!dBJ pg::,ug!Jgdxg SII!H Jg1s;:i4;:,o~ JO Al!:) g4.1

rnaA

U0!P8[0Jd
uo11e1ndod

U0!P8[0Jd
p104asnoH

p104asnoH
Jed SU0SJ9d

066 ~ 'Sll!H Ja1sa400t:J JO "l!:)
.

·uo!lU:J!lddB gsn pUB[ 11a41 ,&lt;q pg1uaJ::, puuwap pgppu g41 lJOddn 01 spuoJ 'Bu!PnI:JU!
'mg1sAs a1npn11su1JU! a41 JO kmnbgpu gq1 g1uJ1suowap 011u;:iwdo1gA;:ip M;:iu nu g.1!nbg~

❖

'JOP!JJO:J ·p~ u.mqny ;:i41 puu •sgl! ll!JPUB! 1;:iwJOJ 'guMoJ. gp10
'10p1uo::, ·p~ 1::i1sg4::,otf ;:i41 'au!pnpu! sugru :J!]!:J;}dS JOJ sg!gJlUJlS 1ugmdopA:;1p;}J ;}lU!l!UI

❖

·1g1om11g104 puu 1-uµ1 npu1 14:aq ';;i::,mo14::,1ug '::lJ 'aJ!JJO
BU!pn[:JU! 'Al!:J g41 JO SB;:JJl:l :l!B;)llUlS ll! lll::lWdO[dAdp g n pgX!Uf JU!Jllap! a.1-uou a1omOJd

❖

·su;)JU JB!lugp!sgJ puu (U!JJgwmo:, 'aU!l !X;:i 8u!pg10.1d puu (MB.Id (U!:JJgwwo::,
~U!lUgi\gJd '.sgpou {B!:JJgwwo::, BU!JS!X;} 011u;:imdopAgp {B!:JJ;}UIWQ:) aJnlt1J l!lU!I 01 ;:lt1U!)UO:)

❖

·(066 J) g:,u1d U! Apug.1.m::, Al[Bnpu
S! 4:'l!lfM lRljl puu UO!lP.(ndod lU;}lill:) g41 Aq g1qu1.1oddns 1u41 llddMl;}q ::l:JU;:)JJJJ!P 1ugJ.mJ
g41 Ol tBnbg S! 4:J!4M lll;}W::lJ:Jll! uu Ol UO!l!PPU U! '100-ppnq lU UO!JBtlldod gq1 i&lt;q d]quuoddn
11341 UBql Jg1ug~ OU gq p1no4s (O I oz JB;}A) 1nO-pJ!nq lU gsn PUB[ ]U!:Jl::lLUUfO:) JO 1unowu dljl

❖

·grq! B;}J gJgqM pgn ·md puu pg1gp! uo::, gq prnoq fdABJl 01nu 1uudn::,:,o
-g,1fo!S 01 S::lA!lBWd)JU 1gq10 JO 1ugwg8umo::,ug puB UO! !AO.Id a41, 'UU]d AUM4lUd Jg)suw
;}ljl 4l!M g::,uupJO:J::&gt;B Ll! Al!:J ;)4l lOOlJ'ano.141 pgdo[gA;,-ip gq p1no4 SAUM ap,,&lt;::,!q puu UB!Jlsgpgd

❖

·u.1g11v.d g n puu1 8un !Xg puu pguuu1d s,Al!:J g41 gAJgs 01 Al!
-:-indn::i 8u!A.UUJ dlB!JdOJddu JO s1gg11s JO Jgqwnu gwnbgpu uu gq prnoqs gJg4l ·smg1 ,&lt; ;,-i ·n
puu1 puu uonuuodsmm Sl! U::ldMl::lq d!4SUO]lUldl Pd:JUU(Bq B ;},\;}!l]:&gt;B p1no4s IHH .1g1s::i4:,o~

❖

SB9J'I:( 6upoq461aN pue Sll!H J9jS94008 JO Al!:)

(1enioe) 086 ~

Sll!H Jaisa4::&gt;0l:::J JO l\l!O

❖

S!l!H J9JS94:l0tf

UD!llllDdDd ID snsua:, 066 l
1

· g!:,u;:ii3u 1u1ugwwgAol3
;)lUlS pun ·1uuopJaJ pun (1u no;:, su naM SB ·s1::,µ1 , !P 1ootps Al!Unwwo;:, ·, ::l!lP
1gp1oq mo WOJJ uo 1m;:idoo;:, pun 1ndu! apnpu! 01 s g:,01d au!uunyd pa1uu1p100;:, u arnaJ:)

'

·poo4.10q4'a!;}U H.IOJ lU!Od IU:JOJ u JO UO!l
-U:J!J!lUJP! JO lU!Od u sawo:,gq l! os pg!J!lnugq puu p;,-idu::, puu1 gq uu::, gl'!Pl]nq Al)Untuwo::,
Jg410 Jo 1004::,s ')[JBd V ·AJ1~ss;:i::,gu ugqM pg::,uu4ua puu pgp;)10.1d gq p1no4s spoo4Joq
-ljB!dll S_Al!:J ;:i41 01 i&lt;1pugp! puu J;}p1uu4:, ;)A!g 1B41 S;}.llllU;}J [B.InlUU puu :J!U;}:JS 'S)fJUlllpUC(
:J!JOlS!H ·p::i1ow0Jd puu pgu:}412ugJlS gq p1no4s spoo4.10q4g!gu JlJ!lugp!sg.1 JO Al!lll;:ip! gyl ❖
·s1u!od uopuuqsgp J,• 410 puu zlu!ddo4s ·s1004::,s
'Sg!l!(!:J'Elj U0!1B;}J:);}J Ol SU;)JP, (Upugp!S;}J snOµBA )[U!I PJ110L(S lll::llSAS ARM(!Ull puu ABM41Bd
d)(lq g4.1 'AllJ ;}l() 1noq2no.141 SAUMJ!Rll pun Sl(lUd g)pq puB UU!JlS;}pgd JO lUdlSAS pg1::,gu
-uo::,Jglll! uu gp!AO.td 01 suH1d 1udwg1dw! 01 gnupuo::, p1no4s ,&lt;11::, g4l ·s)fJUd .10fum puu ug.11:l
1um11.m 'S;}!l!l!:,UJ JU!::&gt;;:ids ·sp1d!JAU\d 'spuno.1i,&lt;e1d 's)f.tBd-!U!W pompoq42!dU gpn1::,u! 4:J!4M
S;}!l!(!:JUJ UOllB;}J:);}J JO W;,'l)Si\S pg1u1g.1J;}lU! LIU U!U1U0:) p1no4s Sll!H .1a1sg4::,o~ JO Al!:) gq1,

❖

I

.suo11:1af0Jd &amp;u1sn~H pue uo11e1ndod
.'·

I

- -•'

1

• ~ : ~ ; - , ~ ) • ~ : • . ",,it.

II

•

•

• ••

,

•

--;,

.~

3SH ONVl ONV NOllVlHdOd

r

FUTURE LAND USE
In order to understand the interrelationship between land use patterns and transportation
and open space patterns, one must consider the original land use planning philosophy of
the community.
The 01iginal 36 square mile township which included the City of Rochester was laid out on a gridiron
pattern; seven major east-west roads intersect six major
north-south roads. The 13 basic streets delineate the
residential modules or NEIGHBORHOODS which
comprise the city's development pattern. Each neighborhood is further defined by unique environmental features
which often form boundaries or edges similar to streets.
Single-family subdivisions and acreage parcels are the
predominant land use throughout these neighborhoods
with multi-family, institutional, quasi-public, and public
uses situated at the edges. The location of neighborhoods
is shown in the graphic to the left.
Industrial development historically was concentrated along the Grand Trunk railroad and
in proximity to M-59. Over time, linkages to M-59 and major arteries of the city's transportation system have become more important to their economic viability than the rail system,
especially as the industrial parks developed in the Hamlin, Crooks, and Livernois areas during
the 1980s. Further expansion of M-59, new interchanges at Adams and Hamlin, and the proximity to the
Oakland Technology Center, will spur future growth
and development in these existing parks as well as the
newly planned Mixed Use District. The city's primary
economic corridors are shown to the right.
Commercial development has been planned to be
located at major intersections. The Future Land Use
Plan recommend that commercial development be
limited to already established commercial development
"nodes." Acreage planned for "strip" commercial
development has been reduced by about 80 acres. The
Future Land Use Plan recommends a new land use
category called non-residential Mixed-Use to be strategically located near the expanded M-59 in close proximity to existing industrial parks in
Rochester Hills and the Oakland Technology Park in Auburn Hills.

AHVWWHS S313110d

Recreation:

The Future Land Use Plan reflects the acquisition and development of parks and recreation facilities in the city. Recreational facilities are widely distributed throughout the city as
shown in the graphic below. The adopted Master Plan for the city has been combined with the
two other major planning documents (Master Recreation Plan and the Traffic Study &amp; Comprehensive
Transportation Plan) to guide land use decisions
through 2010.
It is important to note that land use patterns and
planning for the ultimate composition and character of
this community were established in the early days of
A van Township. Fundamental decisions establishing
the predominance of residential land use have dictated
the infrastructure and public service demands of this
community.
The most recently adopted Master Plan refines that
land use pattern, defines new redevelopment objectives,
and anticipates the mobility and service needs of a builtout Rochester Hills in 2010.
Conclusion:

\

This community is not just made up of residents, but rather is a partnership between all
property owners, all of whom hold special interest in their property. The measure of a true
"community" is its
Future Land Use at Build-out
willingness to sacrifice
City of Rochester Hills 1992
some of the interests of
individual property
4% 1%
owners for the good of
all concerned: residents
of all ages, business
■ Office , research , technology
owners, institutions,
10%
and public agencies.
■ Commericial ■ Recreation
The goal of land use
■ Industrial
■ Streets/R.O.W.
planning is to create a
Residential
■ other
balance between all
interests, to preserve
the natural environment, to enhance economic vitality, and to maintain order and a high quality of life for the
whole community.

City of Rochester Hills
· -·M.-JiSJ:ER -l!LAJ~
Summary Brochure

,

Mayor

PJannin&amp;: Commission

Billie M. lreland

Eric Kaiser, Chairperson
James Rosen , Vice Chairperson
William Bos we II
Gene Ferrera
Jeffrey Hauswirth
Eugene S. Nowicki
Paul S. Funk
George Sadowski
Patricia Somerville

City Council

Scot Beaton, President
Jon A. Buller
Paul S. Funk
Barnett Jones
Gary Peters
Patricia Roberts
Lauren Shepherd

.

This is a summary brochure of the Master Plan document which was adopted by the City of
Rochester Hills to guide land use development over the next two decades. The full text and
report should be read or quoted for accuracy.

INTRODUCTION
On March 31 , 1992, the Rochester Hills Planning Commission adopted a new "Master
Plan." A "Master Plan" is a policy tool which appointed and elected officials use as a guide
for controlling the physical development of the community. The Rochester Hills Master Plan
is a 132 page document containing maps, population and land use data, and an extensive list of
policies. The plan culminates with the "Future Land Use Map" which depicts proposed future
land uses for every piece of property in the city. The Master Plan is available for review at the
Rochester Hills Public Library and in the Rochester Hills Planning Department. The Master
Plan is also for sale in the Rochester Hills Clerk ' s Office for $25 .00.
The community's first Master Plan was adopted by Avon Township in 1964, with
subsequent updates and revisions occurring in 1974, 1977, 1979, 1986 and the latest revision
this year. The adoption of the plan on March 31, 1992 came after 18 months of dedicated
work by the Planning Commission, the Planning Depa,tment, and the city's Planning Con ultant. The plan incorporates the recommendations of the Citizens Advisory Growth Management Committee, input received during a community planning workshop held in April of
1991, and an extensive inventory of natural features.
On the other side of this brochure is a color map of the Future Land Use Plan. Any
questions should be directed to the Planning Department at 656-4660.

�RESIDENTIAL

..,,

c:)
c:)
c:)

1

RUNYON - -

------=-- -- -

SINGLE-FAMILY
CLUSTER HOUSING
TWO-FAMILY or MULTIPLE-FAMILY
MOBILE HOME

COM M ERCIAL
~ CONVENIENCE or COMPARISON
AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE ORIENTED
~ OFFICE
~ RESEARCH OFFICE

C:)

R O C H E S T E R

\
l

MIXED-USE
~ NON-RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE

INDUSTR IA L
c:)

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
~ HEAVY INDUSTRIAL

PUBLIC and QUASI PUBLIC
Cl

"'
u

"

.&gt;-

GOLF
COUR9E

I

l L,,

i&gt;(~ ~~

~-:

..
►

-'

.,,
I

..

·. \J \
....;..

:

.'-1 ..J

.

~.........,_-...

■
♦

.._

EXISTING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SCHOOL PROPERTY or OPTION
J ' I II ' HI H
L
SEI\J IOR HIGH SCHOOL
LOCAL RECREATION
REGIONAL RECREATION
CITY-WIDE RECREATION
SPECIAL PURPOSE
FLOOD PLAIN (generalized)
CIVIC CENTER
FIRE STATION
CEMETERY
PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE

·- -

. r.~

.~

r

p

FUTURE
LAND USE

,,
t

COURSE

(' i I ,,

1._

1·

QbCHESTEQ HILLS
OAKLAND

COUNTY. MICHIGAN

ROCHESTER

. f

:f
\

I,
GOLF

r.

HILLS

PLANNI NG COM MI SSION

A

,l I f

fl: Iu

PUBLIC Ill ARING.

AD0PT10.'

l,t..rdl,

17 W'J:?

fl. ·~

•
t '

GERALD LUEDTKE ANDAsS()CIATES
- - --

-

-

---

I N CO RP O RA TED

n

~ . ) printe d on rec yc led paper

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009867">
                <text>Rochester-Hills_Master-Plan_1992</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009868">
                <text>City of Rochester Hills Planning Commission, City of Rochester Hills, Oakland County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009869">
                <text>1992-03-31</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009870">
                <text>Master Land Use Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009871">
                <text>The Master Land Use Plan for the city of Rochester Hills was prepared by the City of Rochester Hills Planning Commission with the assistance of Gerald Luedtke and Associates, Incorporated and was adopted on March 31, 1992. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009872">
                <text>Gerald Luedtke and Associates (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009873">
                <text>Land Use--planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009874">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009875">
                <text>Rochester Hills (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009876">
                <text>Oakland County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009877">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009879">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009880">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009881">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1009882">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038425">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54812" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59082">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9c74653ef1df274400eb394e1b7ede89.pdf</src>
        <authentication>57db24dd294ca91cebce56e50d09cda3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010056">
                    <text>CITY OF SAUGATUCK

Prepared By The City Of Saugatuck
Planning Commission

�CITY OF SAUGATUCK
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Prepared by the

City of Saugatuck Planning Commission
in cooperation with the Saugatuck City Coµncil

in cooperation with:

Coastal Zone Management Program
Land and Water Management Division
Department of Natural Resources

and with the assistance of:

Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.
302 S . Waverly Road
Lansing, MI 4891 7
(51 7) 886-0555

November 1989

This document was prepared in part throughfmancial assistance
provided by the OjfI.Ce of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration authoriZed by
the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972.

�■

The following individuals participated in the preparation of this plan:

CITY OF SAUGATUCK

Planning Commission
Cynthia McKean, Ernest Evangelista, Robert Lord, Dan Wilson, Don Wobith, Lloyd
Hartman. Richard Crawford. Robert Berger, and Elsie Christenson.
City Council
Robert Berger, Mark Bekken, David Mocini, James Christenson*. Sue Kurrasch,
Richard Crawford, Margaret Sanford. and Linda Kinnaman.
City Manager
Laverne Serne
[* no longer serving)

•
PLANNING &amp; ZONING CENTER, INC.

Sta.ff of Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. who assisted with the preparation of this plan are:
Mark A Wyckoff (President), Kristine M. Williams (Community Planner). Timothy J.
McCauley (Community Planner/Geographic Information System Specialist). William
Bogle (Graphic Artist). Carolyn Freebury (Office Manager). and John Warbach
(Environmental Planner).

�Table of Contents

LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF MAPS
LIST OF TABLES
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. i
Chapter 1

GOALS, OBJECTIVES &amp; POLICIES:
TI-IE AREAWIDE POLICY PI.AN ..................................................................... 1-l
Chapter 2

DEMOGRAPHICS......................................................................................... 2-1
Chapter 3

TI-IE ECONOMY............................................................................................ 3-1
Chapter 4

NATURAL RESOURCES AND TI-IE ENVIRONMENT....................................... 4-1
Chapter 5

EXISTING I.AND COVER AND USE............................................................... 5-1
Chapter 6

PUBLIC FACILIDES AND SERVICES ............................................................ 6-1
Chapter 7

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ................................................................. 7-1
Chapter 8
WATERFRONT.............................................................................................. 8-1

Chapter 9

GROWTI-I AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS................................................. .... 9-1
Chapter 10

FlJfURE I.AND USE .................................................................................... 10-1
Chapter 11

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION ..................................................... 11-1
Chapter 12

STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................... 12-1

APPENDIX A

References
APPENDIXB

Demographic, Economic and Housing Data
APPENDIXC

Public Opinion SuIVey Responses
APPENDIXD

Soil Types - Trt-Community Area

�I

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan
LIST OF FIGURES
NUMBER
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
8.1
9.1
9.2

TITLE
Age Cohorts (1960 &amp; 1980) - Area
Age Cohorts (1980) -Allegan County
Age Cohorts (1980) - City of Saugatuck
Educational Background in 1980 - Persons 25
and Over. Tri-Community Area
Saugatuck Public School Enrollments
Grades K-12
Saugatuck Public School Enrollments
Elementary and High Schools
Employment By Sector in 1980 -Tri-Community
Area and Allegan County
Average Annual Employment - Tri-Community Area
Monthly Employment - Tri-Cornmnity Area, 1988
Tourism Related Employment. 1988 -Allegan
County
Real Property SEV, 1988 - City of Saugatuck
Annual Real Property SEV - Tri-Community
Area (1980-1987)
Percent In Poverty By Age - Tri-Community
Area (1980)
Kalamazoo River Basin
Linkage Plan
Retiree Migration Trends
Population Trend - Saugatuck Township

PAGE

2-2
2-2
2-2
2-3
2-3
2-4
3-2
3-4
3-4
3-4
3-5
3-5
3 -6
4-2
8-7
9-2
9-2

�i

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan
LIST OF MAPS
NUMBER

TITLE

PAGE

Introduction

2.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4

4.5
4.6
4. 7

4. 7a
4.8

4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13

5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4

6.5
6.6
7 .1
7 .2
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4

8.5
8.5a
10.1
10.2

Location
ii
Streets and Roads
V
Lot Lines
vi
School Districts (note: all maps are found at the end of each Chapter)
Topography
Watercourses
Floodplains
Wetlands
Basement Limitations
Septic Limitations
Septic Limitations
On-Site Wastewater Limitations
Most Suitable Soils
Hydric Soils
Groundwater Vulnerability
High Risk Erosion Areas
Critical Dune Areas
Woodlands
Land Use/Cover
Existing Land Use By Parcel
Planning Areas
Historic District
Public Facilities
Water System
Sewer System
Gas Mains
Street Classifications
Act 51 Roads
Outdoor Recreation Sites
Proposed Bike Paths
Watersheds
No-Wake Areas
Saugatuck Harbor
Marinas
Street Ends/Parks
Street Ends/Parks
Future Land Use
Entry Points

�City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan
LIST OF TABLES
NUMBER
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4

TITLE

Population (1950-1980)
Educational Status - Persons 25 and Over
School Enrolhnents - Saugatuck School District
Impact of Travel On Allegan County, 1986
Major Employers
Employment By Industry - 1980
Employment By Occupation - 1980
Average Annual Unemployment Rate
Per Capita Income, Allegan County
Income and Poverty Characteristics
Tri-Community Area
Summary of Relevant Climate Conditions
Land Cover Codes for Protected Wetlands
Existing Land Use
Saugatuck Condo Projects Since 1980
State Historic Sites
Non-Park Public Facilities and Public
Property Inventory
Existing Traffic Counts
Tons Generated per Day By Land Use
Solid Waste Composition
Per Capita Waste Generated
Summer Recreation Programs
Inventory of Outdoor Recreation
Parkland Inventory
Proposed Recreation Projects - Tri-Community
Area
Planned Acquisitions/Improvements to Parks and
Open Spaces
Recreation Needs In The Tri-Community Area
1988 Public Opinion Survey
Kalamazoo River Exceedance Flows (1929-1985)
Kalamazoo River Water Quality
NPDES Permits Issured In The Tri-Community Area
Lake Michigan Lake Levels
Rate of Population Change
Projected Population- 1970-1980 Trend
Projected Number of Households
Percentage of Population By Density Type

PAGE

2-1
2-2
2-3
3-1
3-1
3-2
3 -3
3-3
3-6
3-6
4-1
4-3
5-1
5-1
5-4
6-2
6-4
6-6
6-6
6-6
7-1
7-2
7-4
7-6
7-7
7-7
8-2
8-3
8-5
8-5
9-1
9-3
9-3
9-4

•

�•
9.5
9.6

9.7
9.8
12.1

New Households By Density Type
Future Residential Land Needs
Available Acreage By Land Use Type
Population 2010 - Build-Out Scenario Under
Zoning In Effect
Recreation Facilities - Minimum Size

9-4
9-4
9-4
9-4
12-4

�l

INTRODUCTION
OVERVIEW

The purpose of this Plan is to provide a
policy and decision making guide regarding all
future land and infrastructure development
within the City of Saugatuck. Within the Plan,
key planning issues are identified: a clear set of
goals and policies are outlined: future land uses
are described and mapped; and specific implementation measures are recommended.
All future land uses and policies presented
in this Plan were developed based on a blending
of the natural capability of the land to sustain
certain types of development: the important natural functions played by unique land and water
resources in the area; the relative future need
for residential. commercial. and industrial uses:
the existing land use distribution: and the desires of local residents and public officials as
expressed through direct interviews, a public
opinion survey. town meetings, and public hearings.
This Plan was prepared by the Planning &amp;
Zoning Center, Inc .. under the direction of the
City of Saugatuck Planning Commission. Financial support was provided by the Michigan Dept.
of Natural Resources, Coastal Zone Management Program.
There are three critical components to
using this plan as a decision making guide.
First. are the goals. objectives and policies in
Chapter 1. Second, is the future land use map
and associated descriptive information presented in Chapter 10. Third, is the supporting
documentation found in Chapters 2-9.
Although this Plan states specific land use
development policy and proposes specific land
use arrangements. it has no regulatory power.
It is prepared as a foundation for and depends
primarily on the City zoning ordinance (and
other local tools) for its implementation. This
Plan is intended as support for the achievement
of the following public objectives, among others:
• to conserve and protect property values by
preventing incompatible uses from locating adjacent to each other:
• to protect and preserve the natural resources, unique character. and environmental quality of the area:

• to maintain and enhance the employment
and tax base of the area:
• to promote an orderly development process
by which public officials and citizens are
given an opportunity to monitor change
and review proposed development: and
• to provide information from which to gain
a better understanding of the area. its
interdependencies and interrelationships
and upon which to base future land use
and public investment decisions.
This Plan is unique in that it was prepared
concurrently with plans in Douglas and
Saugatuck Township. It was prepared in light of
the issues, problems and opportunities that the
three communities face together, rather than
being done in isolation as is more frequently the
norm. While the City of Saugatuck Planning
Commission oversaw the production of this
plan, the City Council was also involved in its
preparation. Chapter 11 proposes that the Joint
Planning Committee established to prepare a
Joint Plan for Saugatuck, Douglas, and
Saugatuck Township (tri-community area) be
continued and that it be updated at a minimum
of every five years.
The contents of this Plan draws directly
from previously adopted planning documents.
There has been no effort made to explicitly footnote when material has been so used. Instead it
is intended that the content of those documents
continue to carry forward where they were found
to be helpful in addressing the current and
projected issues facing the tri-community area.
In particular, the City of Saugatuck Land Use
Plan of 1979 was frequently relied upon in drafting portions of this Plan. A number of engineering and technical documents prepared by
outside consultants over the past decade have
also been relied upon. They are referenced in
Appendix A.
SPATIAL LOCATION

The map on the following page show the
location of the City of Saugatuck on the shores
of Lake Michigan. This location along 1-196
makes it easily accessible to travelers from across

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�ll

Kent County

-'
I

Ottawa
County

GRaplds

Allegan County

1'

'

Barry County

'

;,

Van Buren County

Gmazoo
Kalamazoo
County

SAUGATUCK
City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�ill,

across North America. Toe shoreline along the
Kalamazoo River. Lake Kalamazoo. and Lake
Michigan and the beautiful sand dunes and
wide beaches make this a tourist mecca and an
attractive place for retirement.
The trade area for commercial businesses
in the three communities is quite small. Local
residents tend to only do daily and weekly shopping
locally as Holland, Grand Rapids, and
Kalamazoo are nearby for wider selections of
consumer goods. Three school districts serve the
area but all of the students in Saugatuck attend
the Saugatuck School District.
KEY FACTORS GUIDING THIS PLAN

•

Three considerations played prominent
roles in fashioning the contents of this Plan Just
as they do in the Joint Plan. These are based on
widely held public opinions, past and present
investment by public and private entities and a
growing recognition among citizens of the interdependence of the three communities.
First, Saugatuck, Douglas and Saugatuck
Township function as a single economic, and
social unit. Many people live in one of the three
communities and work in another of the three.
Most people live in one and shop with some
frequency in another. School children, by in
large. attend the same schools. Local cultural,
conservancy and retiree activities are Jointly
supported by residents of all three communities.
Several public services are Jointly provided including the Interurban bus service. sewer and
water (at least between Douglas and Saugatuck)
and fire protection. The Kalamazoo River and
Lake Kalamazoo connect all three communities,
as do the local road network. Sometimes it
seems, only the three units of government are
separate. Yet despite these interrelationships,
each community maintains a strong separate
identity among many citizens of the three entities. Even many neighborhoods have strong separate identities (e.g. the hill. the lakeshore,
Silver Lake, etc.). This provides an important
richness and depth to the area. but it can also
be politically divisive.
Second, tourism is the primacy engine driving the local economy. Despite several industrial
employers that provide important diversity to
the area's economy. it is the dollars brought in
by tourists and seasonal residents that fuel
most of the local wages and local purchasing.
The environmental splendor and wide range of
activities open to tourists are the primacy attraction. But no less significant is the small town

character of the area. This character. often described as "cute" or "quaint" by tourists. is
highly favored by visitors and deeply cherished
by local citizens. As a result, any intensive or
poorly planned alterations to the natural environment. or homogenization of the character of
the individual communities is likely to have a
potentially negative effect on both tourists and
residents. This Plan proposes keeping the scale
and intensity of such future changes low and
proposes a variety of mitigation techniques to
prevent adverse impacts on the environment or
on the character of the area from these kinds of
changes.
Third, a balance of future land uses is
necessary- to enhance the stability of the community during poor economic times and to
broaden the population base. Presently there is
a significant lack of housing in the area that is
affordable for families with children. That, in
concert with a decline in children generally (and
an increase in the elderly) has severely impacted
the Saugatuck School District. If all future land
use decisions were made based exclusively on
minimal alteration of the natural environment
or maintenance of the existing community character, then over time, the community would
become more vulnerable to economic downturn,
which usually hits tourist communities veiy
hard. Thus. a balance must be sought between
what otherwise become competing goals (economic development and environmental protection/ community character). This will present a
serious challenge in the future. The pressure
will be great to "sell the farm" for developments
which promise new Jobs/tax base. And while
these are important, the long term impact of
such proposals (in a particular location) could
be very- negative and not worth the tradeoff. All
such decisions need to be made primarily based
on long term considerations, rather than short
term ones.
MAPS

Except as otherwise noted, all the full page
maps presented in this Plan were produced
using C-Map software. This is a PC based computer program initiated by William Enslin, Manager of the Center for Remote Sensing at
Michigan State University. All the data on the
maps was digitized either by Tim McCauley of
the Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. or was
downloaded from the Michigan Resource Inventory- Program (MRIP) database maintained on

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

I

J

�Jv
the State's mainframe computer system by the
Depru:tment of Nat ural Resources.
Several advantages are realized by computerizing this data.1)plcally, geographic information is only -a-vailable on paper maps at widely
varying scales. which makes it difficult to compare data sets for planning purposes. With CMap. all of the maps can be viewed and printed
at any-scale via a variety of different media (color
p.Iotter, laser or ink Jet printer, or dot matrix
pnn,ter). Information can also be combined (or
overlaid) so that composite maps can be created
and compared in a fraction of the time and
-"·expense normally r equired to obtain the same
-: results . .Apother major advantage of computer
-mapping is the ability to update maps continuously, so that an up-to-date map is always
available.
There are three different base maps that
have been used in mapping this information: 1)
a b ase map prepared by the DNR which was
digitized from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map series for the area:
2) a lot line map created by digitizing the lots of
record used for assessing purposes in the three
communities; and 3) a soils base map derived
from the SCS Allegan County Soil Survey. None
of these base maps are exactly identical as they
originate from different sources. All of the land
cover and use based information and topography jg keyed to the DNR/USGS base map. All of
the soils related data is keyed to the soils base
(which was interpreted and mapped by the SCS
from nonrectified aerial photos. so there is some
distortion at the edges of each photo frame) . The
existing land use, sewer and water line maps are
keyed t o the lot line base map.
A transparent copy of the DNR/USGS base
map and the lot line base map follow. These can
be overlaid on any of the maps in this Plan, but
the "fit" will be best when overlaying information
that it was used as the base for. Please note that
the extent of the Kalamazoo River on each base
is noticeably different and is related to the water
levels at the time the inventory or survey was
conducted. On the maps showing all of
Saugatuck Township, we have "corrected" the
DNR/USGS base map to include Silver Lake,
which is merely shown as a wetland (not an open
water body) on USGS maps. A transparency can
easily be made by photocopying any of these
maps in order to overlay several levels of information. Using C-Map on a color monitor, up to
ten levels of information can be overlaid on the
screen at once, including "rooming" in on any

area first (e.g. as would be desirable when examining a specific parcel) .

While the accuracy of all of this data is very
satisfactory for land use planning purposes (especially when contrasted with traditional techniques), none of it is sufficiently detailed to be
absolut ely reliable at the parcel level. As a result,
detailed site analyses of soils. topography.
drainage, etc. are still necessary any time specific site designs are being prepared.
All computerized data is on file locally and
accessible via C-Map for local use and updating.
Contact the wrung administrator or clerk for
further information.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�V

~l

I

I'O
m

r

C

.,______.

"'
V)

-i

•

.

)&gt;

(I)

~

~

:I
~

co

co

KALAMAZOO
RD.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

::0

"'•
~

�vi

~

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�1-1

Chapter 1
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, &amp; POLICIES:
THE CITY OF SAUGATUCK POLICY PLAN

G

•

oals. objectives, and policies are the foundation of a comprehensive plan. They address the key problems and opportunities of a
community and help establish a direction and
strategies for future community development
and growth. Goals establish general direction,
objectives represent tasks to be pursued, and
policies are decision guides. The goals, obj ectives, and policies embodied in this plan were
prepared through an extensive process of leadership surveys, public opinion surveys, meetings with local officials, and town meetings.
The first step in this process was a survey
of area leaders- including members of the City
Planning Commission, City Council, prominent
members of the private sector, and other citizens
identified in the individual surveys. Leaders
were asked their views on the major problems
and opportunities facing the City and the trtcommunity area, and the results were tabulated
and presented to City officials. These results
served as the basis for initiating a public opinion
survey.
Citizen views on local planning issues were
obtained through public opinion surveys mailed
to every property owner in the City and distributed in each rental complex. Survey questions
were prepared for the City through consultations with the City Planning Commission and
City Council. Dr. Brent Steel, Oakland University, conducted and tabulated the survey.
The response rate of 51 % in Saugatuck was
very high considering the length (about 1 hour
completion time) and type of survey and thus
responses probably represent the majority view.
Most respondents were homeowners in their
mid-fifties, registered to vote, who are long-term
residents and plan to live in the area for ten or
more years. Survey results are shown in Appendix A.

Results of the citizen opinion survey and
leadership survey were used to identify issues
for discussion at the first town meeting. This
meeting was a "futuring" session where participants were asked to imagine how they would like
the community to be in the year 2000. Participants were separated into groups and asked to

prepare of list of their "prouds" and "sorries" in
Saugatuck, and things from the past which they
would like to preserve. The lists were compared
and then all engaged in an imaging exercise
where groups were established according to
topic area and were asked to imagine that element of the Saugatuck in the year 2000. This
futurtng process identified key issues and community elements which were pulled together to
form a vision and direction for the City in the
year 2000.
A draft policy plan. with defined goals and
objectives, was then prepared based on this
futurtng process and the survey results. The
draft was refined through a series of meetings
with local officials and then presented to City
citizens in a second town meeting. Citizen comments were reviewed by City officials and incorporated into the policy plan .
Following completion of the draft policy
plan, data and trends in the City were analyzed.
This analysis supported the direction of the
policy plan and was first evaluated by the City
Planning Commission, and then by City citizens
at the third town meeting. Next. key elements of
the plan and proposed strategies to carry it out
were first reviewed by the City Planning Commission, and then by City citizens at the fourth
and final town meeting.
These goals and policies also look beyond
local boundaries to the issues which affect the
region. This was accomplished through the Joint
comprehensive planning process, where representatives of the Village of Douglas and
Saugatuck Township participated in the preparation of Joint goals and policies for the region.
Thus, these goals and policies are premised on
a pledge to mutually cooperate in guiding development consistent with the adopted goals and
objectives of the Joint Plan.
Thus, the broad based input of area officials, leaders, and citizens, plus detailed analysis of local trends and land use characteristics
have formed the goals, objectives, and policies
that comprise the policy portion of this comprehensive plan. These goals and policies will serve
as a guide for land use and infrastructure deci-

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�7

1-2

sions in the City of Saugatuck. With time, some
elements may need to be changed. others added,
and still others removed from the list. Before
amendatory action is taken, however, the impact of the proposed changes should be considered comprehensively in relation to the entire
plan, and the joint plan. It is intended that the
goals and policies be consulted whenever considering future land use decisions.
CITY CHARACTER

Goal: Retain and enhance the scenic, small
town, resort oriented character of Saugatuck.
Policy: Encourage new land uses and densities/intensities of development which are consistent with and complement the character.
economic base, and image of the area, and
which are consistent with this plan and zoning
regulations.
Policy: Promote site planning and design of
new development which is consistent with the
established character of the City and compatible
with existing neighborhoods.
Objective: Improve the visual appearance of
entrances into the city through landscape designs, signs, and land development which promote the vitality and character of the City,
without cluttering the area or creating safety
hazards.
Objective: Explore the possibility of establishing a sign ordinance which is consistent with
Saugatuck Township and the Village of Douglas.
Policy: Encourage the preservation and restoration of historically significant structures.
Policy: Discourage designs which would
block significant views and vistas, especially
from the ridgeline to the water.
Policy: Manage the trees lining City streets
to provide a continuous green canopy.
Objective: Increase enforcement of existing
ordinances and regulations to better preserve
the established character of the City and promote official goals, objectives and policies.
Policy: Preserve wetlands, woodlots. and
other wildlife areas wherever feasible.

GROWfH MANAGEMENT

Goal: Guide development in a manner
which is orderly, consistent with the planned
expansion of public services and facilities, and
strives to preserve the scenic beauty, foster the
wise use of natural resources, protect environmentally sensitive areas, and enhance the special character of each community.
Policy: Encourage development in locations
which are consistent with the capacity of existing and planned public services and facilities,
and cost effective in relation to service extension.
Policy: Review all plans by other public
entities for expansion and improvement of existing transportation networks for impacts on
growth patterns and for consistency with the
goals, objectives, and policies of this plan.
Policy: Consider the impact of land use
planning and zoning changes on Douglas and
Saugatuck Township, and discuss proposed
changes with the affectedjurisdiction(s) prior to
making such changes. A common procedure for
such communication shall be established and
followed.
LAND USE &amp; COMMUNITY FACILITIES

Goal: Promote the balanced, efficient, and
economical use of land in a manner which minimizes land use conflicts within and across municipal borders, and provides for a wide range of
land uses in appropriate locations to meet the
diverse needs of area residents.
Policy: Insure compatible land use planning
and zoning across municipal borders and minimize land use conflicts by coordinating planning
and zoning, separating incompatible uses and
requiring buffers where necessary.
Policy: Discourage sprawl and scattered development through planned expansion of roads
and public utilities and through zoning regulations which limit intensive development to areas
where adequate public services are available.
Policy: Provide for necessary community
facilities (i.e., schools, garages, fire halls, etc.)
consistent with this plan and capital improvement programming.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�1-3

Policy: Coordinate Capital Improvement
Programming with the City of Saugatuck and
the Village of Douglas.

Policy: Encourage new commercial development to locate adjacent to existing commercial
areas.

Policy: Encourage approaches to site design
which take natural features of the property,
such as soils, topography, hydrology, and natural vegetation, into account and which use the
land most effecttvely and efficiently by maximizing open space, preserving scenic vistas, conserving energy, and any other public policies
identified in this plan.

Policy: Preserve the quality, vitality, and
value of City commercial districts through sign
regulations which control the design and location of signs.

Policy: Advise developers during site plan
review to contact the State Archaeologist. Bureau of History (517-373-6358) to determine if
the project may affect a lrnown archaeological
site.

Policy: Avoid separate parking lots for each
business where feasible and encourage centrally
placed parking lots which serve several businesses.
DOWNTOWN SAUGATUCK

Goal: Protect and enhance the appearance
of downtown Saugatuck and promote design
and activities which enhance the festive atmosphere and foster tourism.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Goal: Strengthen and expand upon the
area's economic base through strategies which
attract new businesses, strengthen existing
businesses, and enhance the tourism potential
of the area consistent with the character of the
City and its ability to provide needed public
services.
Policy: Identify potential sites for industrial
development and alternative means of financing
necessary public improvements and marketing
of the sites (i.e. tax increment financing, special
assessments, state grants and loans, etc.)
. Policy: Support efforts to foster tourism by
preserving the scenic beauty of the environment, expanding recreation opportunities, improving tourist attractions, and preparing
promotional materials which highlight the attractions of the City.
Policy: Promote better communication and
cooperation between the public and private sector.
COMMERCIAL

Goal: Encourage the development of commercial land uses in appropriate locations
which serve the current and future needs of
residents and tourists, are of a character consistent with community design guidelines, and
which promote public safety through prevention
of traffic hazards and other threats to public
health, safety, and general welfare.

Objective: Pursue state and local programs
aimed at planning, organizing, and financing
downtown improvement projects.
Policy: Continue to promote the preservation and renovation of historic structures and
districts in accordance with the Saugatuck Historic District regulations, in order to preserve
Saugatuck's historic character.
Objective: Identify alternative solutions to
the parking problems and traffic congestion
which occur in downtown Saugatuck during the
tourist season which do not detract from the
unique character of downtown, and do not penalize the community for the rest of the year.
Objective: Explore the possibility of establishing a shuttle bus to transport visitors downtown from an outer parking area.
Objective: Implement parking improvements and expansion through a variety of
planned financing approaches including capital
improvement programming, public/private
partnerships. special assessments, a Downtown
Development Authority, and others as appropriate.
Policy: Encourage prospective developers to
include off-street parking or alternatives in their
site design which help solve existing parking
and circulation problems.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�1-4

Policy: Discourage signs and advertising
which are inconsistent with the established
character of the downtown area.

more affordable, such as zoning regulations and
other programs which are designed to reduce
the cost of constructing new housing.

Policy: Maintain Butler Street's pedestrian
character with attractive landscaping and
benches to encourage shopping and social activity. and design improvements to reduce traffic
congestion.

Policy: Discourage the development of high
intensity residential uses along the waterfront.

Policy: Preserve and expand parks, greenbelts, benches, and landscaping in the downtown area.

INDUSTRIAL
The City has little roomfor industrial development. The following goals and policies reflect
the City's position on industrial growth beyond
its borders, or within the City if it expands
through annexation fn the future.

Goal: Increase the amount of non-polluting
light industry in the area without damaging the
environment, spoiling the scenic beauty of the
area, or overburdening local roads, utilities, or
other public services.
Policy: Encourage new industries to locate
in small industrial parks near major transportation routes, and in locations with existing or
planned sewer, water, electric, and solid waste
disposal services to minimize service costs and
negative impacts on other land uses.
Policy: Implement site plan requirements
for light industries which incorporate open
space. attractive landscaping, and buffering
from adjacent non-industrial uses.
Policy: Require the separation of industrial
sites from residential areas through buffers
made up of any combination of parking, commercial uses, parks, parkways, open space, or
farmland.
HOUSING/RESIDENTIAL

Goal: Encourage a variety of residential
types in a wide range of prices which are consistent with the needs of a changing population
and compatible with the character of existing
residences in the vicinity.
Policy: Explore alternative measures to reduce housing costs and make home ownership

Policy: Provide land through zoning for
apartments, duplexes, and medium density single family residential uses.
Policy: Maintain the present mix of housing
types (i.e. single family. multiple family, duplex,
etc.).
Policy: Allow only quiet, low traffic, low
intensity home occupations in residential areas
to preserve their stability and tranquility.
Policy: Provide street lights and sidewalks
in residential areas where there is a demonstrated need and according to the ability of
residents to finance such improvements.
SPECIAL ENVJRONMENTS &amp; OPEN SPACE

Goal: Protect special environments and
open spaces, including but not limited to sand
dunes. wetlands, and critical wildlife habitat,
from the harmful effects of incompatible development activity by limiting the type and intensity of land development in those areas.
Objective: Identify development limitations
on special environments through a tiered classification system which classifies these environments based on their value to the ecosystem,
unique attributes, the presence of endangered
plant and wildlife species, and other characteristics deemed significant.
Objective: Devise regulations for land development in special environments which permit
development in a manner consistent with protection objectives and which complement state
and federal regulations for special environments.
Policy : Require development projects
deemed appropriate in and adjacent to special
environments to mitigate any negative impacts
on such environments.
Policy: Encourage acquisition of special environments of significant public value by public

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�1-5

agencies or nonprofit conservancy organizations
for the purposes of preservation.
WATERFRONT

Goal: Protect and enhance the natural aesthetic values and recreation potential of all waterfront areas for the enj oytnent of area citizens.
Policy: Promote the preservation of existing
open space and natural areas along the
Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo Lake, and Lake
Michigan to protect and enhance the scenic
beauty of these waterfront areas and permit the
continuity of these existing open spaces to remain.
Policy: Some waterfront lands may be developed to meet residential and commercial
needs, enhance local tax base, and contribute
to paying for local public service costs associated with their use and development, consistent
with environmental protection policies in this
plan, where such development would contribute
to local quality of life.
Policy: Maximize public access. both physically and visually, by acquiring prime waterfront open space whenever feasible.
Policy: Acquire scenic easements wherever
public values dictate the maintenance of visual
access to the waterfront and the property is not
available for purchase.

Objective: Identify and explore opportunities to cooperate with other jurisdictions and
agencies, including Allegan County and the Department of Natural Resources Recreation Division, on recreation projects which would benefit
area residents and strengthen the tourtsm industry.
Objective: Develop an areawide bikepath
through local funds, grants and loans, and capital improvement programming.
Objective: Develop a system of cross-country ski trails together with the Village of Douglas,
Saugatuck Township, and other jurisdictions/agencies if possible, through the use of
local funds, grants and loans, and capital improvement programming.
Policy: Encourage local government participation in activities designed to enhance the
area's seasonal festivals.
Policy: Retain, maintain, and improve all
existing publicly owned parks so that they continue to meet the diverse recreation needs of
area citizens and tourtsts.
Objective: Explore the possibility of developing a joint public marina and launch facility
where federal and state funding is available to
assist with financing such a venture.
TRANSPORTATION

Policy: Limit the height and intensity of new
development along waterfront areas to preserve
visual access and the natural beauty of the
waterfront for the broader public.

Goal: Maintain a safe, effective, and efficient
road network and improve roads to promote
growth in a way that is consistent with land use
goals, objectives and policies.

Policy: Preserve street ends which abut
water bodies for public access to the water.

Goal: Encourage a wide vartety of transportation means, such as walking, biking, and
public transportation, to meet the diverse needs
of area residents.

Policy: Encourage additional boating related activities, such as transient slips and a
municipal marina.
RECREATION

Goal: Enhance the well~being of area residents by providing a variety of opportunities for
relaxation, rest, activity, and education through
a well balanced system of private and public
park and recreational facilities and actMties
located to serve identified needs of the area.

Policy: Promote pedestrtan and bike travel
through a coordinated network of bikepaths,
trails, and sidewalks.
Objective: Survey the transportation network and identify need for maintenance and
improvements.
Objective: Prepare a capital improvement
budget for financing transportation maintenance and improvements.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�1-6

Objective: Prepare a capital improvements
program to schedule and prioritize improvements and maintenance.

when necessary to meet an identified need in the
area rather than on a speculative basis.

Objective: Regulate deliveries and keep
them off of main streets in the downtown area.

POLICE, FIRE, &amp; EMERGENCY SERVICES

Policy: Promote regularly scheduled, affordable, and dependable public transportation to
increase the mobility and quality of life of those
who depend on public transportation.
Policy: Maintain the sidewalk system and
require developers to provide sidewalks in appropriate locations through subdivision regulations.
Objective: Encourage expansion of the interurban system consistent with municipal
means to finance the increased service and an
identified public need.
WATER AND SEWER

Goal: Insure a safe and adequate water
supply for the area, and environmentally sound
sewage treatment. which is efficiently provided
and cost effective.
Policy: Provide a reliable supply of safe,
clean, and good tasting drinking water.
Objective: Devise alternative mechanisms
for financing sewer and water expansions which
are financially sound and equitable.
Policy: Minimize the potential for groundwater contamination through planning and zoning which is consistent with the capacity and
limitations of the land.
Policy: Promote a joint agreement with the
Village of Douglas and Saugatuck Township to
plan and implement areawide sewer and water
service, including full participation by each in
the Kalamazoo Lake Sewer &amp; Water Authority.
Objective: Upgrade and provide adequate
mains and lines within the existing sewer and
water service.
Policy: Insure that the expansion of sewer
and water service into an area is consistent with
the planned intensity of land use for that area,
scheduled when affordable, and implemented

Goal: Provide police, fire. and emergency
services consistent with a public need and the
ability to finance improvements in the most cost
effective manner.
Policy: Explore the feasibility of consolidating police services across the three communities
to eliminate overlap in service and expenditures
and improve service delivery.
Objective: Evaluate the feasibility of 24
hour medical service which serves all three jurisdictions to be provided by a public or private
entity.
·SOCIAL SERVICES

Goal: Those social services which are efficient to provide at the local level should be
provided to meet the needs of area residents.
Objective: Explore the possibility of establishing support programs for older adults
through the use of volunteers for assistance
with household chores, personal care. and home
repair to help them remain independent.
shorten hospital stays, and lower health care
costs.
Policy: Support efforts to establish community day care center(s) in appropriate locations
to provide quality and affordable day care to
working parents.
WAS1E MANAGEMENT

Goal: Insure the safe, effective, and efficient
disposal of solid waste and toxic substances.
Policy: Encourage the reduction of solid
waste through recycling, composting, and
waste-to-energy projects.
Policy: Manage disposal of solid waste and
location of solid waste facilities in accordance
with the Allegan County Solid Waste Management Plan prepared under PA 641 of 1978.
Objective: Adopt regulations for on-site
storage and transportation of hazardous waste
which require:

'---"

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�1-7

• Secondary containment for on-site storage
of hazardous waste:
• No transfer of hazardous waste over open
ground:
• Arrangements for inspection of, and monitoring underground storage tanks;
• Existing underground storage tanks must
provide spill protection around the fill pipe
by 1998 in accordance with 1988 EPA
standards.
• All existing underground storage tanks
must install leak detection systems within
5 years in accordance with 1988 EPA standards:
Objective: Encourage the development of a
biodegradable container ordinance.
ENERGY

Goal: Promote site design and building
which is energy efficient and encourage energy
conservation through good land use planning
and wise public building management.
Objective: Prepare energy guidelines or
standards which address landscaping, solar access, solar energy systems, sidewalks, subdivision layout, proximity to goods and services.
etc .. and encourage or implement these through
wning and subdivision regulations.
Objective: Establish an educational program (i.e. "energy awareness week") in cooperation with the local school system.
Objective: Pursue funding or financing
techniques to retrofit public buildings to reduce
heating and cooling costs.
Objective: Explore the possibility of establishing a low interest. revolving loan fund for
retrofitting private homes where improvements
would be paid off through savings in heating
costs.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�2-1

Chapter2

DEMOGRAPlllCS
POPULATION SIZE

The City of Saugatuck has grown by 400Ai
since 1950, reaching an estimated 1,090 people
in 1986 according to U.S . Census population
estimates. The City grew only 5% between 1970
and 1980- slow compared to the 40% increase
experienced by the Township. (see Table 2 . 1).
SEASONAL POPULATION

The population of the each community in
the tri-community area swells during the summer when seasonal residents and tourists return. The 1980 census estimates that 26% (203)
of the City's 772 total housing units are vacant,
~easonal, and migratory. Nearly all of these (143)
fu-e detached single family units. Although 3 or
more unit cc:e'1dominiums make up about 23%
of the total seasonal units.
An engineering study prepared by
Fishbeck. Thompson, Carr &amp; Huber for the
Kalamazoo Lake Sewer &amp; Water Authority
(KLSWA) estimates that the total tri-community
area population is comprised of one-third seasonal residents and two-thirds permanent residents and that the weekend daytime population
during the summer is about 2,500 persons.
Although sewer and water demand typically
grows with population, the study found that
demand for sewer and water in the trt-community area increased about 30% between 19801986, whereas population increased by an
average of 200Ai. This reflects the impact of the
seasonal and tourist population on local services.

HOUSEHOLDS AND
AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE

Until recently, the average household size
in the United States has continued to shrink,
due to an aging population, higher divorce rates,
postponed marriages, and lower birth rates. In
keeping with state and national trends, the average household size in the trt-community area
declined, going from 2 .98 in 1960 to 2 .39 in
1980. The average household size in the City in
1980 was the lowest at 2.0, indicative of the high
proportion of "empty nesters" and retirees.
The number of households is an excellent
gauge of the demand for land and services.
Smaller household size means a greater number
of households. If the average household size in
1960 held true today, there would be about 300
fewer individual households in the area. As
household size decreases, the additional households create further demand for land. housing,
transportation, and public utilities. Although
household size has declined substantially over
the past few decades, national trends suggest
that it will soon cease its decline. Nationwide the
average household size has reached a plateau
and state demographers predict that Michigan
will follow suit.
AGE DISTRIBUTION

Historical age cohort data is available on a
regional basis and a comparison of age cohorts
in the trt-community area between 1960 and
1980 reveals a large drop in the proportion of
young children. with a corresponding increase
in the childbearing cohort (20 to 30 year olds)
and 45-54 year olds. The proportion of retirees
to the total population. however. has remained

TABLE 2.1
POPULATION (1950-1980)
COMMUNI1Y

Saugatuck
Saugatuck Township
Douglas
AREAWIDE

1950
770
845
447
2.062

1960
927
1,133
602
2 ,662

1970
1,022
1,254
813
3,089

Source: U.S. Cemus Bureau

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

1980
1,079
1,753
948
3,780

CHANGE

40%
107%
112%
83%

�2-2
FIGURE 2.2

FIGURE 2.1

AGE COHORTS (1980)

AGE COHORTS (1960 &amp; 1980)

AREA§

--

19

p
E

17

R
C

13

15

ALLEGAN COUNlY

""""" 1960
-1980

17

p

11

E

N

g

T

7

3--~-.-~-~---,--~-~
()-1•

s.1,

15-24

25-34

15

E

35-«

55-&lt;14

·-

R

13

C
E
N
T

11
g

5-14

()-4

15-24

25-34

~4

45-54

55-44

I&amp;.

AGE GROUP

SS.

AGE GROUP

age groups. The City also has a large cohort of
45-54 year olds. In regional terms, the City of
Saugatuck comprises 37% of the area's senior
population (despite its small size): Saugatuck
Township comprises 39%: and the Village of
Douglas, 24%.

FIGURE 2.3
AGE COHORTS (1980)
CITY OF SAUGATUCK
20
18

p

16

E

R
C

14

EDUCATION

12

E
N
T

10

Saugatuck has a well educated citizenry. An
analysis of those aged 25 and older in 1980
reveals that 43.6% have completed 1 or more
years of college. The City has the highest relative
proportion of college graduates in the region (see
Figure 2.4). Table 2.2 contains complete information on the educational status of persons 25
years old and over by jurisdiction.

s

()-4

5-14

15-24

25-34

35-«

45-54

55-&lt;14

6St

AGE GROUP

constant (see Figure 2.1). This is out of keeping
with statewide trends and suggests that the area
has experienced high in-migration of retirees
through time. Retirees are attracted by the
area's special resort quality, small town character, and scenic beauty.
Figures 2.2 and 2.3 depict the 1980 age
cohort distribution in the City, in comparison to
Allegan County. The City has a small cohort of
infants and toddlers compared to even the
County. But its most striking characteristic is
its huge cohort of senior citizens relative to other

SCHOOL ENROILMENTS
The Saugatuck Public School District
serves the City of Saugatuck (see Map 2.1).
School enrollment data for Saugatuck High
School and Douglas Elementary, the two
schools which comprise the Saugatuck Public
School system, illustrate the impact of areawide
demographic trends on the local school system.
Between 1973 and 1989, enrollments in the

TABLE 2.2
EDUCATIONAL STATUS
PERSONS 25 YEARS OLD AND OVER

Elementary
1-3 years HS
4years HS
1-3 years College
4+ years College

SAUGATUCK

SAUGATUCK

TOWNSHIP

CITY

185
199
373
157
188

DOUGLAS

57
97
276
137
196

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

73
84
213
123
84

AREA

315
380
862
417
468

r---

~

�2-3
FIGURE 2.4

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND IN 1980
PERSONS 25 AND OVER, TRI-COMMUNITY AREA
40

[ill] TOWNSHIP
•
CITY
~ VILLAGE

35
30

p

25

E
R
C
E
N
T

20
15
10
5
0
ELEMENTARY 1-3 YRS H.S.

4 YRS H.S.

FIGURE 2.5
SAUGATUCK PUBLIC SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS
GRADES K-12

800

E
N
R
0
L
L
M

1-3 YRS COLL.

4 YRS COLL.

(see Figure 2.6). School enrollment data appears
in Table 2.3.
Future elementary and high school enrollments were projected by the Saugatuck Public
School system. These projections show an upturn in high school enrollments in 1991 with a

750

TABLE 2.3
SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS
SAUGATUCK PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

700
650

E
N

600

T

550
500 -+-..---.---.---..-.....-.--.--.......-..--.................--.--.......--.
73-74 75-76 n-18 79-80 61-82 63-84 85-86 87-68

YEAR

Saugatuck Public School system. grades K-12,
have declined by 34% (see Figure 2.5). When
dMded into elementary and high school enrollments, however, the data reveal a 17% increase
in elementary school enrollments since the
1983-84 school year, and a 28% decrease in
high school enrollments over the same period

YEAR

K-6

79-80
80-81
81-82
82-83
83-84
84-85
85-86
86-87
87-88
88-89

326
307
306
252
232
259
250
275
299
296

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

7-12
329
322
299
290
303
296
277
265
246
215

TOTAL

655
629
605
542
535
555
527
540
545
511

�2-4

FIGURE2.6

SAUGATUCK PUBLIC SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS
ELEMENTARY AND HIGH SCHOOLS

360
340

E
N
R
0
L
L

320
300
280

I
I

260

M

E

'X

240

N

T

PROJECTIONS

220

I

·~

200
180
79-80

I
81-82

83-84

85-86

87-88

89-90

91-92

93-94

YEAR

continued climb in elementary school enrollments (see Figure 2.6). Total projected 1994
enrollments, however. are still 23% less than
1973-7 4 levels.
FU1URE TRENDS

If local demographic trends follow those
projected for the county as they have in the past.
then the overall proportion of retirees in the area
will expand much faster than that of school age
children. The Michigan Department of Management and Budget projects that Allegan County's
school age population will grow only 3% by the
year 2000, while senior citizens will increase by
30%. The area's small cohort of infants and
children, large cohort of middle aged to elderly.
and high rate ofretiree in-migration suggest this
will be equally true in the City.
These figures reveal the need to plan for the
needs of an aging community, as well as initiate
efforts to attract families with children into the
area. The impact of demographic trends on the
school system could be lessened by the large
cohort of individuals in their childbearing years
in the Township and the Village. but because
couples are having fewer children. school enrollments will probably expand only slightly. The
Saugatuck Public School system is not likely to
meet its potential capacity for enrollments unless a sequence of events or actions attracts new
families with young children into the area. Two
key factors will be the availability of a.ffordable

housing and nearby employment opportunities.
In the meantime, schools must use space and
resources efficiently as they experience tighter
budgets and small enrollments.
Many of the demographic characteristics
shown here have been analyzed based on 1980
census information. These trends should be
updated when the 1990 census information is
available. Other useful demographic indicators
are summarized in Appendix B.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�N

A

H OL

MAP 2.1 PUBLIC
SCHOOL DISTRICTS

II

Saugatuck

~

Fennville

D

Hamilton

DATA SOURCE: Respective School Districts

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml
August 1989
SA

I ,

DOUG

�3-1

Chapter3

THE ECONOMY
large wetlands abounding with wildlife; orchards and specialty farms; and a scenic location on Lake Michigan encompassing Silver,
Goshorn, Kalamazoo and Oxbow lakes, and the
Kalamazoo River. The City also has a reputation
as a cultural center which serves as an artists'
retreat. The Ox Bow Art Workshop and the Red
Barn theater add to the area's cultural ambience.
Although it is located in Laketown Township, the Saugatuck Dunes State Park serves as
another tourist attraction to the tri-community
area. The Park offers no camping and thus many
visitors stay in the tri-community area. Visitor
counts from the Michigan Department of Resources, Parks Division, reveal that the park has
increased in popularity since the 70's. Visitor
counts performed by the Parks Division show
that 47,463 people visited Saugatuck Dunes
State Park in FY 1988 a 300% increase in park
attendance since 1979, when it attracted only
ll,714visitors.

ECONOMIC BASE

Tourism
Tourism fuels the economy of the tri-community area, with associated boating, restaurant, lodging, and strong retail sectors. Of the
three jurisdictions, the City of Saugatuck relies
most heavily on tourism. The Village of Douglas
has boating and lodging facilities which capitalize on tourism, but its commercial sector is
primarily oriented towards local clientele. The
Township has a small commercial sector which
compliments that of the Village, but it is primarily seasonal residential and rural, with a large
agricultural area to the south. Although the City
of Saugatuck is seen as the resort center of the
area, the entire area benefits from and contributes to the tourist trade.
The area's resort flair is defined by: historic
buildings- including quaint bed and breakfast
inns; the many festivals; outstanding boating;
Oval Beach; downtown Saugatuck; sand dunes;

TABLE 3.1
IMPACT OF TRAVEL ON ALLEGAN COUNTY, 1986
TOT. TRAVEL
TRAVEL
EXPENDl'IURES GENER. PAYROLL

$42,413,000
$/Jobs
% of State Total
.56%
%change
29.52%
i983-86

TRAVEL
GENER. EMPLOYMENT

STATE TAX
RECEIPTS

LOCAL TAX
RECEIPTS

869jobs
.62%
18.39%

$2,191,000
.71%
27.98%

$363,000
.49%
32.48%

$7,689,000
.49%
37.87%

Source: U.S. Travel Data Center, "The Economic Impact of Travel on Michigan Counties."

TABLE 3.2
MAJOR EMPLOYERS
PRODUCT/SERVICE

Hansen Machine
Haworth
Harbors Health Facility
Enterprise Hinge
Douglas Marine
Tafts Supermarket
Paramount Tool Co., Inc.
Rich Products

Metal Stampings
Office Furniture
Nursing Home
Manufacturing
Marina
Supermarket
Machinery
Pies

EMPLOYEES

43
238
78
12
21
32
24
85

Source: Allegan County Promotional Alliance

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�■
3-2
FIGURE 3,1

EMPLOYMENT BY SECTOR IN 1980
TRI-COMMUNITY AREA AND ALLEGAN COUNTY
PUBLIC

E]

CITY

■ VILLAGE
TOWNSHIP

SERVICES

r,;a
FIN/INS/REAL EST

@ COUNTY

RETAIL
WHOLESALE
TRANS/COMM/UTIL
MANUFACTURING
CONSTRUCTION
AGRICULTURE

10

5

0

15

20

25

30

35

40

PERCENT
rism generate in the tri-community area? Although current travel and tourism statistics are
not available for the trt-community area. studies
conducted for Allegan County reveal the tremendous impact of travel and tourism on local economies in the County. This is especially true for
Saugatuck-Douglas-the major resort center in
the County. A study prepared for the Michigan
Travel Bureau by the U.S. Travel Data Center in
1986 found that travellers spent $42.4 million
in Allegan County in 1986, generating $7.7

million for payroll, 869 jobs. $2.1 million in state
tax receipts. and $363,000 in local tax receipts.
This ranks Allegan County 33rd out of
Michigan's 83 counties in travel and tourism
revenues. Selected data from this study is reproduced in Table 3. 1.
Mam.ifacturing

Manufacturing is central to the year-round
stability of the area's economy. Although there
are few manufacturing firms. they provide a high

TABLE 3.3
EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY - 1980

TOTAL
Agriculture
Construction
Manufacturing
TCU*
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
FIRE••
Services
Public Admin.

CTIY

VILLAGE

547
9
30
156
25
13
146
21
125
22

433
16
27
169
10
7
67
15
96
26

TOWNSHIP

689
37
75
274
17
20
106
39
107
14

• Transportation, Communicatiion, Utillities
•• Finance, Insurance, Real Estate
Source: 1980 U.S. Census of Population, General Social and Economic Characteristics.

AREA

1,669
62
132
599
52
40
319
75
328
62

COUN1Y

34,025
2,041
2,009
13,033
1.407
1,398
5,017
1,126
7,105
889

~
'-

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

-

�3-3
TABLE 3.4
EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION - 1980

TOTAL
Manag. &amp; Admin
Prof. Technical
Sales
Clerical
Service
Farm, Fishing
Crafts &amp; Repair
Machine Operators
Laborers, Mat. Moving

Cl1Y

VILLAGE

TOWNSHIP

AREA

COUN1Y

547
77
87

433
34
62
24
45
73
13
70
90
22

685
43
74
83
74
73
43
144
120
31

1,665
154
223
170
189
231
126
210
270
92

34,025
2,315
3,319
2,696
4,189
4,300
1,885
5,447
6,129
3,745

63

70
72
13
66
60
39

Source: 1980 U.S. Census of Population, General Social and Economic Characteristics.

TABLE3.5
AVERAGE ANNUAL UNEMPLOYMENT RA'IE
Trt-Cornmunity

1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988

15.2
14.7
10.8
11.3
6.5
5.8
5.2

County

14.8
14.3
10.5
10.9
7.3
5.6
5.1

State

15.5
14.2
11.2

9.9
8.8
8.2

7.6

Souroe: MESC, Bureau of Research &amp; Statistics, Field
Analysis Unit

percentage of area jobs. Major area employers
are listed in Table 3.2.
EMPLOYMENT

Figure 3.1 illustrates 1980 employment by
economic sector in each community as compared to the County. Manufacturing employs
the most people in each of the three communities. Yet employment in other sectors varies.
Twenty-nine percent of Saugatuck's labor force
are employed in manufacturing, but retail employment is also very high at 27%. This reveals
the dominant nature of the City's retail sector as
compared to that of the region (15%) and the
County (15%). The area's service sector employs
23% of Saugatuck's labor force. Five percent are
employed in transportation, communication, or
utilities, and another 5% are employed in construction. Data on employment by industry appears in Table 3.3.

Employment by occupation in 1980 is
shown in Table 3.4. The highest proportion of
workers in Saugatuck are professional/technical workers, followed by managerial and administrative, service, and clerical workers.
Average Annual
Employment and Unemployment

Unemployment has declined dramatically
with Michigan's economic growth of the late
80's. Table 3.5 reveals average annual unemployment rates in the area since the last statewide recession. (Employment data is not
available for individual communities in the tricommunity area. The Michigan Employment Security Commission aggregates it for Saugatuck
Township, the Village of Douglas, and the City
of Saugatuck.) The tri-community area has a
slightly higher rate of unemployment than Allegan County, although since 1986 the unemployment rate has dipped below that of the state
revealing local or regional economic growth.
Average annual employment in the tri-community area bottomed out in 1986. This reflected the loss of American Twisting, which
employed about 20 people, and the burning of
Broward Marine (about 100 employees) and
Brighton Metal (about 10 employees). Yet in
1987, areawide employment jumped dramatically. During that year Broward Marine reopened its doors: Rich Products, Harbor Health
Facilities, Paramount Tools and other area businesses increased employment: a number of
small businesses and two restaurants opened:
and perhaps most significantly, Haworth Corporation expanded adding two new departments.
Contributing to this was the state and regional

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�•
3-4
FIGURE 3.3

FIGURE 3.2

MONTHLY EMPLOYMENT
TRI-COMMUNITY AREA, 1988

AVERAGE ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT

2700

TRI-COMMUNITY AREA
2.8

T
H
0

u

s

A
N
D

s

2650

2.6

E

2.4

M

2600

p
L
0

2550

2.2
2.0
1.8

y

1.6

M

E
N
T

1.4
1.2
1.0
1980

2500
2450
2400
2350

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

2300

YEAR

J

F

M

A

M

J

J

A

s

0

N

D

MONTH

economic boom, and corresponding increases in
construction and spending. Figure 3 .2 illustrates this trend.
Seasonal Employment

Local employment increases each summer
as tourists flood into the trt-community area.
Figure 3.3 reveals the impact of tourism on
employment in the tri-community area during
the summer months.
The high number of jobs created during the
summer months are primarily unskilled jobs in
the seIVice/retail sector. especially eating and

drinking establishments and various other recreation-oriented uses. Figure 3 .4 reveals the
explosion in summer employment for tourismrelated industries in Allegan County. This increase creates a high demand for teenage
employees. Tri-community area businesses note
the difficulty of filling these jobs. and the need
to import seasonal labor. This is yet another
impact of the demographic make-up of the area
(i.e. the low number of teenage children). New
industry and affordable housing in the area
could attract families with children who, in tum,

FIGURE 3.4

TOURISM RELATED EMPLOYMENT, 1988
ALLEGAN COUNTY

1.2

E

1.0

MT

0.8
0.6

p

H

L o

ou
y

!

0.4

MN

0.2

E

0.0

MONTH

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

N

T

D

s

�3-5
FIGURE 3.6

ANNUAL REAL PROPERTY SEV
TRI-COMMUNITY AREA (1980-87)
70
60
M

S~
ELI

50

vo 40
N

s

30

=

Saugatuck

-

Douglas

=

Township*

-

Township....

20
10.-~~=--------1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987
YEAR
• not including Village(s)
•• including Douglas through 1987 and Saugatuck through 1984.

could staff area businesses during peak summer months.
TAX BASE

Residential uses make up the bulk of the
area's tax base (65%), representing an SEV of
$21,167,486. Yet commercial uses comprise
one-third of the City's real property SEV at
FIGURE 3.5

REAL PROPERTY SEV (1988)
CITY OF SAUGATUCK
RESIDENTIAL 65%

$10,677,205. Industrial uses comprise 2% of the
tax base, with an SEV of $1,126,200 (See Figure
3.5).
Figure 3.6 illustrates changes in annual
real property SEV between 1980 and 1987 for
the City of Saugatuck. Saugatuck was also included in the Township's tax base prior to 1985,
when it became a city. This explains the sharp
drop in SEV for the Township between 1984 and
1985. SEV's are also shown for the Township
minus the Village(s). The figure shows a jump in
the City's tax base between 1983-84 following
incorporation, with a steady increase since then.
More complete information on annual SEVs and
1988 breakdowns can be found in Appendix B.
INCOME

According to 1985 census estimates, the
City of Saugatuck has the second highest per
capita income in the county- although the City
has given up first place to Laketown Township
since 1979. Table 3.6 shows this comparison.
(Per capita income in 1979 was $7,688 for the
state and $6,744 for the county; in 1985 it was
$10,902 for the state and $9,346 for the county.)
COMMERCIAL 33%

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�■
3-6
FIGURE 3.7

p

.
.

E

so

PERCENT IN POVERTY BY AGE
TRI-COMMUNITY AREA (1980)

70

lEl

TOWNSHIP

•

CITY

~

VILLAGE

R
C

"

E
N

,o

T
20

"
LESSTMANS5

...

56-51

AGE

Table 3.7 reveals selected income and poverty characteristics by jurisdiction in the tricommunity area. Although the per capita
income in the area has been consistently higher
than that of the county, the median household
income is lower. The median household income
is the point at which 50% of the households earn
more and 50% earn less. This statistic is more
representative of local trends as it is less easily
distorted by a few high income wage earners.
Poverty data correspond with median
household income. As median income goes up,
the proportion in poverty goes down. Although
the City has a higher proportion of persons in
poverty than the Township, it also has a higher
proportion of individuals with earnings 200% or
more above the poverty level.
Figure 3. 7 depicts the proportion of persons
in poverty by age. (The poverty level used by the
1980 census in recording this data was an
annual income of $3,778 for those under 65,
and $3,689 for those 65 and over.) While some
of the City's poor are elderly, the largest number
are under 55.

TABLE3.6
PER CAPITA INCOME ($), ALLEGAN COUNTY (TOP TEN)
1985

1979

Saugatuck
Laketown Township
Holland
Gunplain Township
Otsego Township
Plainwell
Saugatuck Township
Allegan Township
Leighton Township
Fillmore Townshi2

Laketown Township
Saugatuck
Holland
Gunplain Township
Otsego Township
Saugatuck Township
Douglas
Fillmore Township
Plainwell
Le!,ghton Townshi2

9031
8332
8125
8074
7437
7396
7286
7170
7051
7015

13,013
12,631
11,608
10,947
10,239
10,228
10,150
10,120
9,886
9,539

Source: 1985 Per Capital Income Estimates, U.S. Census Bureau

TABLE 3.7
INCOME &amp; POVERTY CHARACTERISTICS TRI-COMMUNITY AREA (1980)

Median HH income
% in poverty
Income 200% of poverty
level &amp; above

TOWNSHIP

CI'IY

VILLAGE

COUN1Y

16,412
7.1%
74%

15,182
8.6%
75%

14,963
11.3%
73%

17,906
8 .0%
71%

Source: 1980 Census of Population

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�4-1

Chapter4

NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
CLIMATE

TOPOGRAPHY

Weather conditions affect Saugatuck's economic base. Variations in average conditions.
especially during the summer months, can
cause fluctuations in tourism and outdoor recreation activities, upon which the local economy
is dependent. Prevailing winds determine
lakeshore and sand dune erosion patterns.
which impose limitations on development along
the Lake Michigan shore.
Below, in Table 4.1, is relevant climatic
information for the area. These conditions generally do not pose limitations on the area's
growth except along the Lake Michigan shore,
where natural forces can cause rapid and extensive erosion of beaches and sand dunes.

The portion of the City on the east side of
the Kalamazoo River (and Lake) has an escarpment, from 20 to 40 feet high, separating two
relatively flat areas. The wate rant area. located
below the escarpment, extends from the east
bank of the river two to four blocks inland. The
"hill" area above the escarpment extends further
inland past the City limits and into Saugatuck
Township . The area on the west side of the
Kalamazoo River consists entirely of sand dunes
between the river and Lake Michigan. with a
narrow strip of flat land along the waterfront.
The highest point in this area is Mt. Baldhead,
which rises 310 feet above Lake Michigan.
Steep slopes present impressive scenery
and pose increased maintenance and construction costs as well as safety risks. This is especially true with unstable landforms such as
sand dunes. Generally, slopes exceeding 7%
should not be developed intensively, while
slopes of more than 12% should not be developed at all because of erosion and storm water
runoff problems. On the topographic map (Map
4.1), steep slope areas are indicated by three or
more contour lines in close proximity.

GEOLOGY

Saugatuck is located on the southwestern
flank of the Michigan Basin, which is a bedrock
feature centered in the middle of the Lower
Peninsula. The sandstone and shale bedrock is
overlain by glacial deposits from 50 to 400 feet
thick. There are no outcroppings of the bedrock
and the proximity of the bedrock to the surface
of the ground does not impose limitations for
normal excavating or construction. Glacial deposits consist primarily of sandy lake bed deposits east of the Lake Border Moraine, a major
physiographic formation which is adjacent to
Lake Michigan.

DRAINAGE

Saugatuck lies within the Kalamazoo River
Basin, which begins near Jackson and extends
westward into Saugatuck Township, Douglas

TABLE4.l
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT CLIMATE CONDITIONS
CLIMATE VARIABLES

Coldest Months (January-February)
Hotest Month (July)
Annual Average Temperature
Average Rainfall
Average Growing Season
Average Annual Snowfall
Elevation Above Sealevel
Prevailing Winds

AVERAGE CONDITION
23.3° F - 25.1° F

71.5° F
48.3° F
35.7 inches
153 days
79.7 inches
590 feet
Westerly

Source: USDA Soil Survey, Allegan County

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

EXTREME CONDITION

-11° F - -35° F
96° F - 106° F

�•
4-2

ational or agricultural uses. Installation of public utilities and permanent construction for residential, commercial or industrial uses should
not occur in floodplain areas.
Several parts of the City are built in the
floodplain. Among these are the blocks between
Water Street and the Kalamazoo River, a narrow
strip along the west bank of the river and an area
near the Blue Star Highway bridge. A substantial portion of the undeveloped land in the northeastern corner of the City also lies in the
floodplain.

FIGURE 4.1
KALAMAZOO RIVER BASIN

WETLANDS
Q)
-IC

Ill

-'

Lake Erie

and Saugatuck (see Figure 4.1). Most of the City
drains into the Kalamazoo River. The remainder,
consisting of the west slope of the sand dunes,
drains directly into Lake Michigan. A small area
is drained by Goshorn Creek, a short-run
stream that flows into the Kalamazoo River. All
areas of the City drain fairly well due to adequate
slopes and highly permeable soils. An exception
to this is the wetland area near Goshorn Creek.
Watercourses in Saugatuck are shown in Map
4.2.
FLOODPLAINS

Areas adjacent to creeks, streams and rivers are susceptible to periodic flooding that can
cause extensive damage to buildings and can
pose a substantial threat to public health and
safety. The U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers has
mapped the boundaries of the 100 year floodplain in Saugatuck. Those boundaries are denoted by the shaded areas on Map 4.3 and is the
area that would be inundated during an Intermediate Regional Flood. The Federal Flood Insurance Program has established guidelines for
use and development of floodplain areas. Those
regulations indicate that development in floodplains should be restricted to open space, recre-

There are several wetlands within the City
of Saugatuck. Most are contiguous to or hydrologically connected to Lake Michigan, the
Kalamazoo River or Goshorn Creek. Wetlands
are valuable in storing floodwaters and recharging groundwater. They are also habitat for a wide
variety of plants and antmals.
Because wetlands are a valuable natural
resource, they are protected by Public Act 203
of 1979. PA 203 requires that permits be acquired from the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) prior to altering or filling a
regulated wetland. The Wetland Protection Act
defines wetlands as " land characterized by the
presence of water at a frequency and d.uratton
sufficient to support and that under normal circumstances does support wetland vegetation or
aquatic life and ts commonly referred to as a bog,
swamp, or marsh and ts contiguous to the Great
Lakes, an inland lake or pond. or a river or
stream."
Regulated wetlands include all wetland
areas greater than 5 acres or those contiguous
to waterways. Wetlands which are hydrologically connected (i.e. via groundwater) to waterways are also regulated. Activities exempted
from the provisions of the Act include farming, grazing of antmals, farm or stock ponds, lumbering, maintenance of existing nonconforming
structures. maintenance or improvement of existing roads and streets within existing rtghtsof-way, maintenance or operation of pipelines
less than six inches in diameter. and maintenance or operation of electric transmission and
distribution power lines.
Permits will not be issued if a feasible or
prudent alternative to developing a wetland exists. An inventory of wetlands based on the
DNR's land use\cover inventory are illustrated
on Map 4.4. Table 4.2 shows the land use\cover
codes pertaining to regulated wetlands in the

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�4-3

area. Herbaceous and shrub rangelands may
not actually meet the statutory definition of
wetland. so on site inspections will be necessary
to establish whether a wetland indeed exists in
such areas.

sons
A modem soil survey was completed for
Allegan County by the USDA Soil Conservation
Service in March, 1987. The soil types present
in the City of Saugatuck are shown on the map
and table in Appendix D. Each soil type has
unique characteristics which pose limitations
for particular uses. The most important characteristics making the soil suitable or unsuitable
for development are limitations on dwellings
with basements, limitations on septic tank absorption fields. and suitability for farming. Soil
limitations have been classified into three categories, which are described below.
• Slight: Relatively free of limitations or limitations are easily overcome.
• Moderate: Limitations need to be considered. but can be overcome with good management and careful design.
• Severe: Limitations are severe enough to
make use questionable.
Large areas of soils in Saugatuck have severe limitations on residential and urban development. The degree of soil limitations reflects
the hardship and expense of developing the
land.

TABLE4.2
LAND COVER CODES FOR PROTECTED
WETLANDS IN TRI-COMMUNITY AREA
CODE

DESCRIPTION

31
32
412
414
421
429
611
612
621
622

Herbaceous Rangeland•
Shrub Rangeland•
Upland Hardwoods
Lowland Hardwoods
Upland Conifers
Lowland Conifers
Wooded Swanps
Shrub Swamps
Marshland Meadow
Mud Flats

Source: Michigan DNR Land Cover/Use Classification
System
• Wetlands are sometimes, but not always associated
with these land cover types.

Basement Limitations
Limitations for dwellings with basements
are shown on Map 4 .5. Some soils impose severe
limitations on basements because of excessive
wetness. low strength, excessive slope, or
shrink-swell potential. These areas are found
primarily in the west side of the City in the sand
dunes, which have excessive slopes. The escarpment area, with excessive slope. the large area
of open space near the high school. with wetness, and an area north of Allegan and Maple
Streets. with wetness and excessive shrinkswell potential, are other parts of the City with
severe limitations.
Septic Limitations
Most of the soils in the City of Saugatuck
impose severe limitations on septic tank absorption fields because of excessive slope and rapid
permeability. The remainder are sand beaches
and excavated areas, which are not rated for
septic limitations. The permeability of soils in
the City ranges from very poorly drained to
excessively drained. with most being excessively
drained. Map 4 .6 shows the septic limitations
for the City. This map suggests the need for
municipal sewers to accommodate new development in those areas not presently served (east
side).
The degree of soil limitations reflects the
hardship and expense of developing that land
for a particular use. Those soils classified as
"severe" have varying degrees of development
potential based on the nature of the limitation.
Map 4. 7 provides this more detailed analysis of
severe limitations on septic tank absorption
fields. The "severe" soils have been categonzed
as follows:
A Sandy, moderate to rapid permeability
B. Rapid permeability, wetness and high
water table
C. Wet. ponding, heavier (clay) soils, slow
permeability
D. Very wet soils, organics. wetlands, floodplains. unable to support septic fields.

Soils in categories B and D are not able to
support septic fields because of extreme wetness. Soils in category A are classified as "severe" by the Soil Conservation Service, however
the Allegan County Health Department considers them to have only moderate limitations for
septic systems. They can be made suitable for
development by increasing the distance between

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�•
4-4

the septic system and the water table. Soils with
moderate and slight limitations also appear on
Map 4.7. Soils that are most suitable for development, with respect to basement and septic
limitations, are shown on Map 4 .8 .

Standards for Septic Systems
The Allegan County Health Department has
established certain standards for septic systems. These standards apply somewhat different site characteristics when determining the
degree of limitations for septic systems. compared to the Soil Consetvation Service approach. which focuses on soil types and slope.
Below is a review of these standards by development type.
Single Family Residential
Before a permit is considered, there must
be at least four feet of dry soils between the
bottom of the septic system and the water
table. In addition, there must be one foot
between the existing ground surface and
the seasonal water table, and two feet between the existing ground surface and the
clay. Special permits will be considered only
if the site size is at least two acres and the
septic system is put on top of four feet of
sand. Residential sites that fail to meet
those requirements will not be issued septic
system permits.
All Other Residential, Plus Commercial
These fall under State guidelines of at least
two feet between the existing ground surface and the water table and four feet of dry
soil between the bottom of the septic system
and the water table. No special permits are
issued for these uses.
Hydric Soils
Hydric soils are another limitation on development. They are very poorly drained, saturate
easily and retain large quantities of water. Map
4 .9 shows where these soils are. In Saugatuck.
hydric soils are found near watercourses and
correspond to present or former wetlands. There
are only two areas of these soils in the City; along
Goshorn Creek and north of Campbell Road
between River Road and Manchester Lane. Residential, commercial and industrial development in areas containing hydric soils should be
discouraged.

GROUNDWATER
Groundwater is an unseen resource and is
therefore particularly vulnerable to mismanagement and contamination. Prior to the l 980's ,
little was known about groundwater contamination in Michigan, and some startling facts have
recently been revealed.
The leading causes of groundwater contamination in Michigan are from small businesses
and agriculture. More than 50% of all contamination comes from small businesses that use
organic solvents, such as benzene, toluene and
xylene, and heavy metals. such as lead, chromium. and zinc. The origin of the problem stems
from careless storage and handling of hazardous
substances. On paved surfaces where hazardous materials are stored, substances can seep
through or flow off the edge of the pavement.
Materials can get into floor drains which discharge to soils, wetlands or watercourses.
At present, groundwater is the only tapped
source of potable water for the City of
Saugatuck, the Village of Douglas and
Saugatuck Township. The glacial drift aquifers
in the area are especially vulnerable to contamination because of rapid permeability and high
water table. In a local example. Douglas' municipal water supply has been contaminated by
volatile organic compounds (VOC's), supposedly
by an industrial site within the Village. Some
areas without municipal sewer and water service are in danger of groundwater contamination
because of septic systems, intensive development and a high water table.
Protection of groundwater resources is
problematic because of diflkulties in locating
aquifers. Well depth records indicate the relative
location of groundwater at particular points.
According to well logs from Michigan Groundwater Smvey (MGS) data. well depths near the
City of Saugatuck range from 29 ft . to 215 ft ..
with the municipal well being at 200 ft. Soils
most vulnerable to groundwater contamination
are found on Map 4.10.
SPECIAL FEATURES

Lake Michigan Shoreline and Beaches
The Lake Michigan shoreline in Saugatuck
is very susceptible to wind and water erosion
during storms and high lake levels due to resultant wave action. The current closing of
Lakeshore Drive in Douglas and Saugatuck
Township due to bluff erosion is a graphic example of the power of wave action. These natural

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�4-5

processes pose hazards to public health and
safety. The Shorelands Protection Act of 1970
was enacted to identify areas where hazards
exist by designating them and by passage of
measures to minimize losses resulting from natural forces of erosion. High risk erosion areas
are defined as areas of the shore along which
bluffiine recession has proceeded at a long term
average of 1 foot or more per year. The entire
Lake Michigan shoreline in Saugatuck has been
designated as a high risk erosion area, with
some portions eroding at a rate of 1. 7 feet per
year. Within the designated area, shown on Map
4.11, alteration of the soil, natural drainage,
vegetation, fish or wildlife habitat, and any
placement of permanent structures, requires a
DNR review and permit, unless the local unit of
government has an approved high risk erosion
area ordinance; Saugatuck does not.

WOODLANDS

The wooded areas of the Saugatuck are
primarily hardwoods. Large areas of upland
hardwoods are found in the sand dune area
between the Kalamazoo River and Lake Michigan, and in the undeveloped area in the eastern
part of the City. Woodlands in the City are
shown on Map 4.13. Mature trees represent a
valuable resource in maintaining the aesthetic
character of the area, not to mention their overall importance to wildlife and the natural environment. In particular, the wooded sand dunes
along the Kalamazoo River and Lake Michigan
should be managed to insure their long term
existence.

Sand Dunes

The sand dunes along Lake Michigan on the
west side of the City represent a unique and
fragile physiographic formation and ecosystem
that is very susceptible to wind and water erosion, and destruction due to careless use or
development. The dune area which is in the City
of Saugatuck and Saugatuck Township has
been identified by the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) as a critical dune area,
subject to protection under the Michigan Sand
Dune Protection and Management Act, PA 222
of 1976. The designated critical dune area is
shown in the shaded region of Map 4.12.
Recent legislation (PA 147 &amp; 148 of 1989)
provides for additional protection of critical
dune areas. Under these Acts, all proposed commercial or industrial uses. multifamily uses of
more than 3 acres, and any use which the local
planning commission or the DNR determines
would damage or destroy features of archaeological or historical significance must be approved
by the State. Single family residential development is to be regulated at the local level. The law
prohibits surface drilling operations that explore for or produce hydrocarbons or natural
brine as well as mining activities (except in the
case of permit renewals). The legislation also
imposes certain standards on construction and
site design in critical dune areas.
Site design and construction standards for
sand dunes should be enhanced at the local
level to prevent further deterioration of this fragile environment. Areas needing special attention
in such standards are vegetation, drainage and
erosion protection.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�~

-------------------■
N

A
0

1200

600

Scale 1"

=

u

1800

1212 ft

........ ·

_) (1c /··--.

..........

MAP4.1 TOPOGRAPHY

.

.,

(,__ ____

.·•••··.
'•·:::.::

.......

:_~.- ....

"•

Saugatuck

Contour interval is ten feet
Darker lines are 50 foot contours

Augult 1989

DATA SOURCE: USGS Quadrangle Maps

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, LMlling, Ml

. . ...

�N

A
0

600

1200

1800

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

CD

r

C

r,
(/)

-I

.

1-

►
:::0

(/)

I

1(!)
(!)

MAP 4.2 WATERCOURSES

I/I
k''I

Saugatuck

Lakes, rivers and streams
Drains and lntennittent streams

August 1089

DATA SOURCE: MDNR

Planning a Zoning Cen• Inc, Lanllng, Ml

�---------------------A
N

----

,.
0

600

1200

1800

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

l/)

-I

.

1-

J&gt;
::0

(/}

I

1(!)

'.O

CAMPBELL

MAP 4.3 FLOODPLAINS
■

100 Year Flood Area

~

500 Year Flood Area

August 1989

DATA SOURCE:MONR

Saugatuck

Plannng &amp; Zoning Centar Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
0

600

1200

1800

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

MAP 4.4 WETLANDS

■
Ill
II

Saugatuck

Lowland Hardwood

Shrub Swamp

Lowland Conifer

Herbaceous Rangeland

Wooded Swamp

August 1989

■

DATA SOURCE: MDNR

II

Marshland Meadow &amp;
Mud Flats

Shrub Rangeland
Planning &amp; Zoning Cen- Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
0

1200

600

Scale 1"

=

1800

1212 ft

MAP 4.5 BASEMENT LIMITATIONS

Ill

Severe

■

Excavated

mIIIl

Moderate

~

Wetland Soils

W

Slight

~

Sand Dunes

August 1989

DATA SOURCE : USDA Soil Survey, Allegan County :

Saugatuck

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
0

600

1200

1800

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

MAP 4.6 SEPTIC LIMITATIONS

1111

IIIlil
mill

Severe

■

Excavated

Moderate

~

Wetland Soils

Slight

~

Sand Dunes

August 1989

DATA SOURCE: USDA Soil Survey, Allegan County:

Saugatuck

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
0

600

1200

1800

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

Saugatuck

MAP 4. 7 SEPTIC LIMITATIONS
~ Sandy, moderate to rapid
~ permeability
~ Rapid permeability, wetness

el of highwater table
11&amp;1 Wet, ponding, heavier

a

Moderate Limitations

hH

Slight Limitations

■ Excavated

1111 clay soils.slow permeability
August 1989

DATA SOURCE: USDA Soil Survey, Alleg. Cnty Hlth Dept

~
~

Ill

Sand Dunes
Wetland Soils
Very wet soils, organics,
wetlands, floodplains

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lan1ing, Ml

�---------------------- ---·---

b;

r-~

I

i

I

/2

:

! ~~

-

i

/4

/

;=
µ _____ __ ____ _

10

•

. 'D

25

I

-·

II

-~~
~--~

I

II
I

1

311

I
I

~

. --

".,

:,e

II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

IJZJ

-

MAP 4.7 A

Saugatuck

ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT LIMITATIONS
f'IC1 NO. 2

.......................
.......
....__

�N

A
,__.._.
0

600

I'
1200

1800

/
I

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

I

I

MAP 4.8 MOST SUITABLE SOILS
11111

Soils Most Suitable For Development

■

Excavated Areas

August 1989

DATA SOURCE: USDA Soil Survey, Allegan County

Saugatuck

Planning &amp; Zoning Centar Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
IJIII A
0

600

1200

1800

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

MAP 4.9 HYDRIC SOILS
11111

Hydric Soils

~

Wetland Soils

August 1~

DATA SOURCE : USDA SoU Survey, Allegan County

Saugatuck

Planning

a Zoning c.,., Inc, Lanllng, Ml

�N

A
0

600

1800

1200

I
,I

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

I

I

I
I

I

I

MAP 4.10 GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY

Ill

Areas most susceptible to contamination

■

Excavated Areas

~

Wetland Soils

August 198Q

DATA SOURCE: USDA Soils Surwy &amp; Alleg. Hitt, Dept.

Saugatuck

Planning &amp; Zoning Cenlar Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
600

0

1200

1800

Scale 1" = 1212 ft
, ..................

········

NJ /
'

1(/)

lI

I

f-

(!)
(!)

!

KALAMAZOO LAKE

MAP 4.11 HIGH RISK EROSION AREAS
~

Accretion Area

■

Recession Area

August 1989

DATA SOURCE: MONA

Saugatuck

Numbers indicate accretion/recession rate in
feet per year

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�.~----------------------A

■

N

'I

I

, / I

,,

0

600

1200

I

I

1800

I
I'

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

I

I

.

1(/)

I
1l!)

lO

KALAMAZOO LAKE

MAP 4.12 CRITICALDUNEAREAS
~

Saugatuck

Critical Dune Areas

August 1Q89

DATA SOURCE: MONR

Planning &amp; Zoning

een• Inc, Lansing, Ml

,,

�N

A
1200

Scale1"= 1212ft

Saugatuck

MAP 4.13 WOODLANDS

II

Lowland Hardwood

ill!

Upland Conifer

1111

Upland Hardwood

~

Wooded Swamp

lliiJ

Lowland Conifer

~

Shrub Swamp

August 1989

DATA SOURCE: MONA

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�3-1

Chapter5

EXISTING LAND COVER AND USE
LAND USE/COVER DATA SOURCES

Land cover and use refers to an inventory
of existing vegetation, natural features, and land
use over the entire City (see Map 5. 1). This data
was obtained in computerized form from the
Michigan Resource Inventory System (MIRIS)
database, which is maintained by the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) . The
data came from photo interpretations of aerial
infrared photos by trained interpreters at the
West Michigan Regional Planning Commission.
The DNR will update this data every 5 years.
Land cover and use categories included in the
data are explained on the legend to Map 5.1. The
wetlands and woodlands maps in Chapter 4
were also derived from this data.
MIRIS data was supplemented by a thorough land use inventory of Saugatuck, conducted in the summer of 1988. The inventory
was based on ownership parcels and conducted
both on foot and through a "windshield smvey".
TABLE 5.1
EXISTING LAND USE

lAND USE

ACRES

%

11.AMSROWResidential
single-family
174
multi-fainily
24
26
Commercial
Industrial
2
Institutional
21
249
Parks
Boat Storage &amp;
6
Service
29
Kalamazoo
River Wetland
Streets &amp; Roads
106
136
Vacant
Commer2...3.
cial/Residential
775
TOTAL

22 .45%
3 . 10
3.35
0.26
2 .71
32. 13
0.77
3 .74
13.68
17.55

Mil
100.04%

• % of total land area minus street ROWs

The existing use of every parcel was recorded
and evaluated in combination with low-level
aerial imagery available from the Allegan County
Equalization Department and the MIRIS land
cover/use map to prepare the existing (parcelbased) land use map (see Map 5.2). The following
description is based on these maps and data
sources and the USDA Soil Survey of Allegan
County.
Land use by category is shown in Table 5.1 .
This information was derived from the aforementioned data sources and areas were calculated using CMAP computer mapping software.
The predominant land use in Saugatuck is
parks. This is followed by single fainily residential, commercial and multiple family residential,
respectively. Vacant land comprises eighteen
percent of the total land area (street ROW's
excluded) of the City.
RESIDENTIAL

Most of the residential development in
Saugatuck is concentrated around the center of
the City. Other residential areas are along
Campbell Road and along the west shore of
Kalamazoo Lake. Most resort and seasonal residential development is located along Kalamazoo
Lake and the Kalamazoo River. Single family
structures are the predominant residential type.
A number of large older homes have been conTABLE5.2
CITY OF SAUGATUCK
CONDO PROJECTS SINCE 1980

PROJECT
Bridges of Saugatuck
Waterside
Saugatuck Shores
East Shore Harbor Club
Bay View + 4 single family
Saugatuck Harbors
Holland &amp; Francis
Windjammer
TOTAL

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

# UNITS

8
6
16
46
13
24
6
8

127

�-

p

■

IS-2

verted to two or three units or bed and breakfast
establishments. Multiple family structures are
found along Lake Street. in several condominium developments lining the east shore of
Kalamazoo Lake . and in other parts of the City.
New condominium developments since 1980 are
shown on Table 5.2. Apartment complexes in the
city include Ridgewood Oaks Apartments and
Olde Mill Apartments on Maple Street in the
northeast comer of the City. and Harbor View
Apartments north of Campbell Road in the
southwest part of the City.
COMMERCIAL

The major commercial area in Saugatuck is
the City Center. which is primarily tourist oriented, with some establishments serving local
residents. Businesses include a bank. hardware, furniture, restaurants. drug store. clothing, tourist accommodations and many other
tourism related activities. Other commercial activities are scattered throughout the City and
along the waterfront. Boat storage and repair
facilities represent a different type of commercial
use and line the waterfront throughout the City.
The largest of these is located between Holland
Street and the Kalamazoo River.
INDUSTRIAL

Industrial activity in Saugatuck is limited
to one site near Culver and Griffith Streets. The
site is occupied by Rich Products. which produces food products (fruit pies). Another site on
Water Street. formerly occupied by American
Twisting Co .. is vacant. There are no other occupied industrial sites in the City, nor are any
available.
PLANNING AREAS

Eight planning areas have been identified
within Saugatuck. These planning areas represent portions of the City within which particular
land uses or other characteristics give a distinguishable identity or quality. Some people may
identify with these areas as "neighborhoods".
Following are brief descriptions of existing land
use. These descriptions are based on the planning/neighborhood areas depicted on Map 5.3.
City Center

The City Center is the most intensely developed area of Saugatuck. It includes the central
business district. restaurants and shops. and is

the focal point of much of the City's activities.
During the summer months. the City Center is
heavily used by tourists. Much of the revenue
gained locally through tourist expenditures
comes from this area. The City Center is known
throughout the state for its excellent antique
shops and art galleries. The City Hall is an
historic building and also serves as a tourist
attraction. This area expresses the style. activity, and scenic and architectural qualities that
make the City one of the most unique in the
region.
Generally. the structures are small, simple,
and classical in design. They reflect tum of the
century commercial demand for limited and accessible retail space. Unlike most cities, much
of the original architecture has survived. The
style remains simple, spare, utilitarian and elegant. The atmosphere is informal. The scale is
human and pedestrian and compliments the
surrounding natural environment without overpowering it. This unique City Center preserves
the history of Saugatuck and establishes a sense
of comfort and place.

Center Transition Area
The area immediately north of the City Center along both sides of Butler Street is occupied
by 22 single-family structures. The homes are
typically old and large. Some are over a hundred
years old, with historic qualities. Many of these
homes have become difficult to heat and keep in
good repair because of their age and size. The
homes are primarily white and wood frame and
are in good repair. Most structures are occupied
on a year-round basis.
Water Street Shoreline
Most development along Water Street is
waterfront oriented. This includes public and
private marinas. restaurants capitalizing on the
waterfront view, tourist attractions offering boat
rides. and charter boats. A number of substantial commercial investments along the waterfront have made this area one of the City's most
active. There are approximately ten single-family homes. four multi-family structures. including a new twenty-four (24) unit condominium,
and transient lodging facilities, the largest of
which has forty units.
The water line is almost entirely lined with
bulkheads and utilized for boat docks. The waterfront area is a natural extension of the City
Center in terms of tourist activity. Tourists visit
the shops and galleries in the City Center, then

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

~

�walk the boardwalk along the water and perhaps
eat there. Both areas are closely related in terms
of contribution to the City's economic base and
tourism orientation.
Lake Street

The Lake Street area follows the shoreline
of Kalamazoo Lake between Griffith Street and
Blue Star Highway. Land uses in this area include approximately 35 single-family homes,
several condominium developments. several
transient lodging establishments, a marina,
some commercial facilities , and the City's largest industry. Rich Products. Many of the singlefamily homes are seasonal dwellings occupied
only during the summer months.

Park Street

Park Street follows the west bank of the
Kalamazoo River. There are approximately 100
single-family structures in this area, most of
which are occupied by seasonal residents. Other
land uses include tourist lodging facilities and
waterfront oriented commercial uses. Approximately twenty new single family homes have
been built along Campbell Road.
Much of the area was platted in an uncoordinated and unplanned manner. Many of the
plats along Park Street are either long and narrow, or are small in overall square footage. Platted lots range in size from 6 ,000 square feet to
25 ,000 square feet.
Mt. Baldhead

The HHill"

This area is located "on the hill" above the
City Center, Lake Street and waterfront areas
and consists primarily of single-family homes.
The homes are typically 30-60 years old and in
good repair. The area is uncongested and is
affected by tourist activity only at the fringes ,
where traffic enters the City along Holland
Street, the City's main entrance. This area contains most of the City's permanent (year-round)
residents
Holland Street

Holland Street is the main entrance into the
City from the north. The street is lined with trees
and residences and gives visitors a favorable
impression as they enter the City. Most of the
residents are year-round, although there are
some seasonal residences fronting the
Kalamazoo River.
Maple Street

This area is underdeveloped, except for cityowned utilities (water wells) and approximately
eight single-family homes. Additional homes are
being built above a deep and scenic ravine which
traverses this area. The area contains some
wetlands and areas with development limitations. This area is the last substantial tract of
vacant property in the eastern part of the city,
covering approximately 60 acres. Ownership is
in large tracts. There are no recorded subdivisions. Across from Maple Street in Saugatuck
Township are commercial uses including warehouses and storage sheds.

The Mt. Baldhead area is one of the most
unique, scenic, and beautifully preserved mature dune areas along the Lake Michigan shore.
Most of the dune area is vegetated, forested and
stable. There are some "blow-out" areas free of
vegetation through wind disturbance and some
areas that have been cleared for recreational
purposes. The area is recognized by the Michigan State Department of Natural Resources as
an Area of Particular Concern (APC).
The dune area covers approximately 300
acres, 150 acres of which is owned by the Presbyterian Church, 75 acres by the City of
Saugatuck, and the remainder in large private
holdings. The only development is the Oval
Beach Lakefront swimming and recreation area.
The Mt. Baldhead area is an important
component of the City's attractive natural environment, and enhances the City Center and the
waterfront. With those areas, the forested dunes
and Mt. Baldhead complete an attraction that
provides unparalleled visual quality, contributing to a vital active tourist economy. Mt. Baldhead is not only an important natural resource
for the entire state and country, but also a
"display case" for the City itself and therefore
has a direct and positive influence on the economic vitality of the community.
lllSTORIC &amp; ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES
Some archaeological sites and historic sites
can be found in Saugatuck. Historic and archaeological sites are designated by the Michigan
Bureau of History.
Historic Buildings and Sites

The Michigan State Register of Historic
Sites was established in 1955 to provide official

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�■

TABLE 3.3
STATE HISTORIC SITES
DESCRWTION

Sawtatuck:
All Saints Episcopal
Church
Singapore (Village Hall)

WCATION

252 Grand St.

Marker on Village Hall on
Butler St.
Clipson Brewery Ice House - 900 Lake St.
Twin Gables Hotel (Singapore Country Inn is commonname)
888 Holland
Horace D. Moore House
St.
736 Pleasant
Warner P. Sutton House
(Beachwood Manor)
St.
Fred Thompson-Willliam
633 Pleasant
Sorin~er House
St.
Source: Michigan Bureau of History

recognition for historic resources in Michigan.
Designated historic sites have unique historic,
architectural, archaeological, engineering, or
cultural significance. There are six State historic
sites in Saugatuck, which are listed on Table
5 .3. Singapore, Michigan's most famous "ghost
town" and once a thriving lumber town, lies
buried at the mouth of the Kalamazoo River. A
plaque commemorating its existence stands in
front of the Saugatuck City Hall.
State historic site designation does not include any financial or tax benefits, nor does it
impose any restrictions upon the owner of the
property, unlike similar designations under federal law.
Historic Districts
Architecture in the City Center of
Saugatuck is generally late nineteenth century
Victorian, with some commercial and residential
structures built forty years before the Victorian
period. The oldest structures are characterized
by their wood frames, gabled roofs and false
fronts . They are typical of early mercantile establishments and reflect the area's lumber harvesting industry. The later Victorian structures
are typical of small towns and are predominantly of masonry construction. While none are
larger than two stories, several have large floor
areas due to long, narrow floor plans commonly
used. Original facades are not elaborate in their

architectural detail, however several stylistic elements are present including Italianate cornices
and brackets, and Greek revival entablatures
end pediments. Other particularly interesting
features include press-tin ceilings and cornices
and lead-glass transoms.
Saugatuck has taken local steps to preserve
its historic character and particularly the City
Center area. PA 169 of 1970 permits the legislative body of a local government to regulate the
construction, demolition and modification of all
structures within a designated historic district.
The City of Saugatuck has established an historic district within the oldest part of the City.
Within this district, construction, demolition
and modification of structures must comply
with requirements set forth in the wning ordinance. Historic districts provide a means for the
community to protect its historic resources from
development pressures. The Saugatuck historic
district is shown in Map 5.4.
Archaeological Sites
Archaeological sites are of particular scientific value to the fields of anthropology, ecology.and biology and may have historic or ethnic
significance as well. There are 120 archaeological sites scattered throughout Saugatuck Township, Saugatuck and Douglas. mostly related to
Ottawa and Potawatomi cultures. Their exact
locations have not been disclosed by the Bureau
of History in order to protect them from exploitation. Recipients of Federal assistance must
ensure that their projects avoid damage or destruction of significant historical and archaeological resources. The Michigan Bureau of
History reviews these projects to assess their
impact on archaeological sites.
The Bureau of History also recommends
that those proposing development projects in
Saugatuck contact the State Archaeologist to
determine if the project may affect a known
archaeological site. This is particularly critical
given the existence of Indian Burial sites in the
area. If an important archaeological site will be
affected, archaeologists will negotiate a voluntary agreement to preserve those artifacts. The
Bureau of History serves in an advisory capacity
and has no legal authority to restrict development rights.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

~

�Saugatuck

MAP 5.1 LAND USE/COVER
WATER

URBAN

EI].

113 Single Family

.......
........
.......

115 Mobile Home

1,11,11,1,

1,1,1,11,.

■
......•••
~

124 Neighborhood Business
126 Other Institutional
193 Outdoor Recreation

FARMLAND

□
~
~
~

IIIIill

I

RANGELAND

II

mm

WETLAND
611 Wooded Swamps
612 Shrub Swamps
621 Marshland Meadow
622 Mud Flats

BEACH

21 Cropland
22 Orchards

52 Lakes

~
~

72 Beach At Riverbank
73 Dunes

31 Herbaceous Rangeland
32 Shrub Rangeland

WOODLAND

~

412}
414}Broadleaf

■

421}
429}Conifers

August 1989

I.
I
I

I

DATA SOURCE: MDNR

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
r---.0

600

1200

Scale1 " = 1212ft

City of Saugatuck
LAND USE/COVER

1800

�-

II-

Saugatuck

MAP 5.2 EXISTING LAND USE

l§ffl Mulltiple Family Residential

ruill
m~

rrrrrrm Res,.dent'1a1/Commerc1a
. I
l;;,:ili..;J

mm

Junkyard

■ Commercial

~

Mobile Home Park

II

ffl

Vacant

ffiIIl]

Wetland

D

Water

~ Single Family Residential

Boat Storage/Marina

Industrial
[it]
·..:..:..:.,:j

~gg

Agricultural - Orchard
Recreational

Agricultural

August 1989

SOURCE: PZC Land Use Survey

Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

City of Saugatuck
EXISTING LAND USE

A
~lillll

0

500

1000

1500

Scale 1" = 1032'

~
,.

.

/
~·

.· ,

,

. ,,,

,

,,-:·)

,; ~

i. ~~
- ,. 1~ arY ·,
lffi ~~ ~~/.
@II !fl ~ ~ ' / l::.
I If lj \4i4 ~·14J ;
:mmm:
1e
ri HmTI
Dr: ~:mr,.:..§mmi
ill
rrm
,-z1 "~•........,...__,.,,,_,.,
I ._.;
,,■ = ··:'_:·~~
: ~~ ,-;~ '.;,
~•A,
1/·

· ¼_ •

~

ri;B•
~

~

~:

~,,::, -✓ 1

,•.•..

• •

V

&amp;al
"'

/
,'

,,

r~

,

~

. (111

-~~
◄

~
".

'"

,.1·

,

,.
;f;',\
,,. : , / /2

~

j

,,.,.

/,,;,j;',

�.II

N

A
,.._.._..
0

600

1200

Scale 1'' = 1212 ft

KALAMAZOO LAKE

MAP 5.3 PLANNING AREAS

,,

■ City Center

§

Lake Street

■

m

The Hill

[]

Maple Street

Center Transition

~ Water Street
August 1989

DATA SOURCE : Saugatuck Planning Commisssion

Saugatuck

■
~

m

Park Street
Mount Baldhead
Holland Street

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
0

4,000

8,000

Scale 1"

12,000 ft

= 9060 ft

MAP 5.4 SAUGATUCK HISTORIC DISTRICT
■

Saugatuck

Historic District

August 1989

DATA SOURCE : City Of Saugatuck Ordnances

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lanling, Ml

�6-1

Chapter6

PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
NON-PARK PUBLIC FACil.JTIES

A listing of all non-park public facilities in
the City of Saugatuck is found on Table 6.1. This
includes police and fire stations, municipal government offices, vacant lands and other public
facilities. All are found on Map 6.1.
UTILITIES
Sewer and Water

The Saugatuck-Douglas area sewer and
water systems are managed by the Kalamazoo
Lake Sewer and Water Authority, which is responsible for operation and maintenance and
provides water production and wastewater
treatment. Each participating community is responsible for providing and financing their own
infrastructure. The KLSWA performs the construction work or contracts it out.
The service areas for the sewer and water
systems, shown on maps 6.2 and 6.3. extend
only for very short distances into Saugatuck
Township. Most of the developed part of the City
is served by both water and sewer, and the
system is designed to accommodate expansion
and addition of new lines.
Numerous engineering studies have been
conducted which discuss various alternatives
for improvement of utillties. These include using
Lake Michigan for the municipal water supply
and extending public utilities into the Township.
Proposals must take into consideration the permanent population, seasonal population, number of daily visitors, and future industrial flow.
Peak periods for public utillties in the area are
more pronounced than in typical communities
due to the relatively high seasonal and daily
visitor population, especially pronounced in the
City of Saugatuck.
Water System

The reliability of the water system depends
on water supply sufficient to meet peak demands. storage capacity to provide fire flows for
sufficient duration, adequate water pressure
and distribution system loops. The existing system is deficient with respect to meeting peak
demands. The water is not treated, except for

chlorination and iron sequestering. Parts of the
current water system date back to 1907 in
Saugatuck, and to 1914 in Douglas. In addition,
the water mains are old, small and substandard,
leaks are a problem on older service lines and
there may be some unmetered taps. Growth is
restricted in areas not serviced by the system
and is limited overall at present because of
insufficient pumping capacity.
The existing water system also has many
dead end lines, which are susceptible to water
discoloration and development of tastes and
odors due to stagnation. The best arrangement
for water mains is the gridiron system, where all
primary and secondary feeders are looped and
interconnected, and the small distribution
mains tie to each loop to form a complete grid.
If an adequate number of valves are inserted,
only a small 1 block area will be affected in the
event of a break. A primary feeder from the
Saugatuck wells to the system's primary 12"
feeder loop has been installed, and all of the
primary 12" feeder loop has been completed,
including two river crossings.
In 1984 and 1985, a one million gallon
above ground storage tank was constructed,
which allowed Saugatuck and Douglas to meet
normal and fire protection demands. If
Saugatuck Township is included in the system,
the storage tank is adequate for fire protection
for the near future, but additional capacity is
needed if service were extended to the southern
portions of the Township.
Recent chemical contamination of the
Douglas municipal water supply has led to an
overburdening of the City of Saugatuck water
system, which is presently serving the entire
network and is working at full capacity; 24
hours per day during peak months. This has led
to restrictions on non-essential uses such as
lawn sprinkling, car and boat washing, and has
reduced the minimum reserve needed (600,000
gallons) for fire protection down to 2/3 of the
needed amount. A moratorium has been imposed on new development other than one or two
family dwellings. The pumping capacity of both
wells has dropped due to depletion (drawdown)
of groundwater.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�-

■

6-2

TABLE 6.1
(NON-PARK} PUBLIC PROPERTY &amp; PUBLIC FACILITIES INVENTORY
CITY OF SAUGATUCK

USE

SIZE*

CONDmON VALUE

NAME

LOCATION

City Hall

City offices,
council
chambers
3338 Wash- Public works
in.lrton Rd.
3338 Washin.lrton Rd.
Water
Maple St.

Built 1882,
remodeled
1989
Built 1985

$475,000

Built 1985

$25,000

Maple St.

Water

Built 1973

$80,000

Park St.

Residence

$94,000

Butler &amp;

Restrooms

Remodeled
1978
Built 1988

Restrooms

Fair

$6,400

Restrooms

Fair

$13,000

Poor

$4,000

Maintenance bldg.
Sand &amp; salt
storage
Pump
House #1
Pump
House #2
Mt. Baldhead Park
Butler St.
comfort
statoin
Park St. comfort station
Water St.
comfort station
Beach storage bldg.
• Land =

102 Butler

$275,000

$65,000

$97,000

Main

Mt. Baldhead
Wicks Park

Oval Beach

Storage,
restrooms,
concessison
acres or square feet (Building = Square feet)

Communications from the Michigan Department of Public Health have demanded that
substantial progress be made towards a solution
to the water supply problem in the near future.
The Health Department has also questioned the
usefulness and reliability of both Douglas wells
because well # 1, which is out of use, is contaminated, and well #2. which is used for emergency
purposes only. may become contaminated
through further use. As a result. alternatives for
additional water sources are currently under
review, with Lake Michigan and the City of
Holland water system being considered the most
viable options. Engineering studies have indicated a cost of nearly $4.5 million for construction of a Lake Michigan water treatment facility
which would provide a clean and abundant
source of water. A large service area. formed by
including large portions of Saugatuck Township, would reduce the per capita cost burden
on users. This facility would be capable of

pumping 3 million gallons per day. which could
serve the needs of all three communities well
into the future. This, combined with a desire to
retain local control over the water system.
makes using Lake Michigan water the favored
alternative.
Sewer System

Wastewater treatment is provided at a treatment plant located in Section 10 of Saugatuck
Township. The facility was constructed by the
City of Saugatuck and the Village of Douglas in
1980. The treatment system provides biological
and clarification processes for the reduction of
BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) and suspended solids, including chemical precipitation
for the reduction of phosphorus from fertilizers
and detergents. The plant has two aerated lagoons and was designed for incremental addition of lagoons to accommodate increased
wastewater flow. The facility was designed for

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

~
,_,,

�6-3

heavier BOD loading than other facilities its size,
in order to accommodate a pie factory, and thus
may not need more capacity of that type for
many years. The discharge is to the Kalamazoo
River on the north side of Saugatuck.
In 1957, many of the storm sewers in the
City of Saugatuck were converted to sanitary
sewers. This system was expanded in 1979 with
PVC pipe, and some improvements were made
to the old system. Douglas and Saugatuck
merged their facilities in the late 1970's to form
the KLSWA. The capacity of the sewer system is
sufficient to meet the needs of Saugatuck and
Douglas until approximately 2008. The capacity
of the wastewater treatment facility would have
to re-rated to 1.2 MGD for the Township to use
the system until 2008.
The treatment facility was designed for a
twenty year planning period through 1998,
based on a population tributary of 7,695 and a
wastewater flow of 0. 75 million gallons per day
(MGD). The treatment facility is rated at 0 .8
million gallons per day by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). The facility
was designed for a peak flow of 2 MGD. The
present average flow is 0.4 MGD. A larger flow
can be accommodated by increasing hours of
operation, provided that the lagoons can treat
the sewage well enough. An engineering study
in 1987 determined that August (maximum day
was Aug. 14) is the month of peak flow for
wastewater, with 0 .598 MGD. Based on the
study, the treatment facility operated at 75% of
flow capacity, 55% of BOD capacity, and 300/2 of
suspended solids capacity. Existing effluent
quality and treatment efficiency was found to be
excellent. Increasing the rated capacity of the
facility to 1.2 MGD with two aerated lagoons
would accommodate all three jurisdictions
through 2008 and possibly beyond. Pursuing
this option would require detailed preparation
of data accompanied by a formal request to the
DNR from the KLSWA. Further capacity could
be obtained by adding another aerated lagoon,
estimated to cost $900,000 in 1987.
Storm Sewers

There are very few mapped stormwater
drains in Saugatuck. Drainage has not been a
significant problem in most developed areas
because of sandy. high permeability soils and
lack of large paved areas. However, there are
some problems in low-lying areas. There are
suspected to be some stormwater drains, individual residential and business gutters flowing
into the sanitary sewer system which need to be

removed. Efforts are currently underway to improve stormwater drainage.
County Drains

There is one County drain locted within
Saugatuck. The Golf drain follows Goshorn
Creek and aids in removal of water from a low
lying wetland area in the northeast portion of
the City.
Gas, Electric and Telephone

There are no major gas or oil pipelines in
Saugatuck. Gas service is provided by the Michigan Gas Utilities Company and approximate
locations of gas mains are shown on Map 6.4.
Electricity in Saugatuck is provided by Consumers Power Company. Telephone service is provided by General Telephone and Electric Co.
(GTE).

TRANSPORTATION

Transportation facilities within the area include streets and roads and a public transportation system (Interurban). Saugatuck is served
by a major Interstate highway (I-196), with access two miles away in Saugatuck Township,
and by a State highway (M-89), located four
miles to the south in Saugatuck Township. Blue
Star Highway, part of the Great Lakes Circle
Tour, is the other major highway serving the
area. The nearest railroad is the Chesapeake
and Ohio RR, which runs north and south five
miles east of the City boundary. Kent County
International Airport is within 50 miles and is
served by 3 major airlines, with 126 flights per
day. Parking is an important issue in the City
Center because of the daily and seasonal tourist
economy. It is crucial that adequate parking
facilities be provided to stimulate and maintain
the vital tourism in the City. The area is also
served by Greyhound Bus Lines.
Streets and Roads

Streets and roads are classified according
to the amount of traffic they carry and the
nature of the traffic. Four common categories
are local streets, collectors, local arterials, and
regional arterials. Local streets typically provide
access to residences, with speeds from 20 to 25
mph (Mason St.). Collectors connect local
streets to arterials and speeds average 25-35
mph. (Holland St.). Local arterials facilitate
larger volumes of traffic which originates and
terminates within the area, with a trip length of
ten miles or less and an average speed of 35-45

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�-

p
6-4

mph. (Blue Star Hwy.). Regional arterials are
typically used for high speed through traffic, and
access to the roadway is usually limited (1-196).
Locations of collectors. local arterials and regional arterials are shown in Map 6.5. Each
class of street has an important function in
maintaining the efficient flow of traffic and it is
essential that adequate transportation facilities
exist or can be efficiently provided.
Some up-to-date traffic counts for Blue Star
Highway are available. A recent count for Blue
Star Highway at two intersections in the Township only considers northbound traffic, missing
traffic entering Saugatuck from exit 41 on 1-196.
Other existing traffic counts for area roads are
inadequate for planning purposes. Accurate and
up-to-date traffic counts are needed in order to
make some decisions pertaining to priorities for
road improvements. monitoring of flows, evaluating impacts of proposed new development,
and projecting future traffic conditions. Table
6.2 shows what very limited information is presently available from the County Road Commission.
PA 51 of 1951 provides for the classification
of all public roads. streets and highways for the
purpose of managing the motor vehicle highway
fund. The two classifications which pertain to
the City of Saugatuck are "Maj or Street" and
"Local Street". These roadways are shown in
Map 6.6. Funding is provided to cities and villages for street maintenance and construction
TABLE6.2
EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE

WCATION

4L3L78

Blue Star &amp; 64th
130th E &amp;Wof
Blue Star
Blue Star &amp; 129th

1959 &amp; 1968
(same count)
July 1987 (2
different days)
1969

VOWME

Old Allegan, east
of Blue Star
1982
130th &amp; 70th, east
of Lakeshore Dr.
July 1987
North 135th at
Blue Star (northbound)
July 1987
129th at Blue
Star (northbound)
October 1985 Center at Blue
Star

5,319
368
10,575
8,256
336
285
7,018
6,192
10,861

based on the number of miles of streets by class.
within each community. Saugatuck has 3.03
miles of Major Streets and 8.94 miles of Local
Streets under Act 51 designation.
Parking

The scenic natural setting of Saugatuck. its
reputation as a haven for artists, unique commercial and residential character, and its proximity to major metropolitan areas, make it an
attractive resort center. With this comes overcrowding of the City Center with automobiles on
summer weekends. Several recent studies indicate that most of the congestion occurs in an
area along Butler and Water Streets. The downtown area has become saturated and alternative
parking facilities have been suggested as a result of those studies. One alternative is a park
and ride system, which utilizes a parking lot at
the periphery of the City and a shuttle from that
lot to the downtown area. The existing Interurban system could be used for such an alternative. ThiS concept, if implemented, could also
relieve some of the congestion from the City
Center area and make it an even more attractive
place to visit. Other alternatives suggested in
recent years include construction of additional
parking lots or parking ramps. and changes to
existing parking spaces, including downsizing
and reducing the permitted parking period.
Each alternative has proponents and detractors.
A mechanism to resolve the current impasse is
being sought.

Entrances Into the City
Holland Street to the north and east is the
main entrance into the City from the north (from
1-196). It is typical for vehicles to enter the City
on Holland. then turn onto one of three eastwest streets and proceed into the City Center
along Butler. Holland is heavily travelled for a
two lane residential street and has remained
primarily residential from the City limits to Mary
Street. A restaurant and the City's largest marina are located along Holland Street. Butler
Street serves as the "main street" for the Center
City area, with commercial development on both
sides of the street. It is heavily travelled during
the tourist season.
Lake Street at Blue Star Highway is the
City's second major entrance. Traffic volumes
result from traffic going to the City Center area
and from traffic associated with the industrial
use, Rich Products. The industrial location generates a significant amount of truck traffic. The

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

■

�6-5
intersection with Blue Star Highway, while aesthetically pleasing, raises safety questions because of a combination of high speed traffic,
poor visibility due to vegetation and curvature
of the Highway, and lack of signaling. However,
current traffic volumes do not justify further
action at this time.
Street Conditions

Many streets in the City are built on an
unstable clay base. which causes pavement to
crack and deteriorate because of excessive
shrink-swell potential. Storm water drainage is
also inadequate many places, and water remains along the sides of some roads or runs
across the roads, eroding the base and pavement. Recently paved roads, including Elizabeth
Street in 1988 and East, West, Takken and
Taylor Streets in 1989. have had a sand cushion
and underdrains installed. Some roads in the
northern and western parts of the city are unpaved, but are not used frequently or only in the
summer. In the 1988 Public Opinion Survey.
46% of City respondents rated street maintenance as "poor". while 68% rated street resurfacing as "poor".

Interurban
The Interurban is the area's public transportation system and is funded in part by a 1
mill assessment. The service was started in May
1980 as a two year experimental project and was
initially funded at lOOo/4 by the State. Following
the experimental period, some of the cost burden was borne by the trt-communities through
the 1 mill assessment. The system has four
buses and in 1988 there were approximately
3 7,000 riders. A new maintenance facility in
Douglas. to be completed in the spring of 1990,
is being constructed at a cost of $211,000 entirely with state and federal funds. It is possible
that the Interurban could be used to shuttle
people to Saugatuck from remote parking facilitates and ease the parking burden there. The
Interurban is governed by a board consisting of
members from all three communities.
POLICE, FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES
Police

The City of Saugatuck maintains its own
police department, which is housed in the City
Hall at 102 Butler Street. The department has
two patrol cars and two full time police officers,
including the Police Chief. There are also five
part-time police officers. Extra demand for ser-

vices occurs during the summer, particularly
during festivals and holidays.
Police protection is also provided by the
Allegan County Sheriff Department and the
Michigan State Police. The State Police maintains the Saugatuck Team post north of the
Township on 138th Avenue in Laketown Township. The facility has one lieutenant, one sergeant, seven troopers and eight patrol cars. The
Allegan County Sheriff Department operates a
satellite post in Fennville.
Fire
Saugatuck is included in the Saugatuck
Fire District. This district is managed by a five
member Fire Authority. Saugatuck, Douglas
and Saugatuck Township each appoint one person to the board. These three then appoint two
other people from the area at large, subject to
approval by the three communities involved. The
Saugatuck Fire District has 35 volunteer personnel, including the fire chief. There are two
fire stations, one located in downtown Douglas
(47 W. Center) and another in Saugatuck Township near the intersection of Blue Star Highway
and 134th Avenue. The latter is a new building
designed to house six vehicles, offices and a
meeting room with 9,600 square feet. It is located adjacent to the existing Maple Street facility.
The Fire District maintains eight vehicles
and one vessel:
• 1975 Chevy Pumper
• 1981 International Pumper
• 1968 International Pumper
• 1959 Ford Pumper
• 1949 Seagrave Aerial
• 1977 GMC Step Van
• 1985 FWD Tanker
• 1985 Karavan Trailer
• Boston Whaler boat with pump
Emergency Services

Ambulance services are provided by the
Fennville Fire District and by Mercy Hospital in
Grand Rapids, dispatched from Holland. The
Saugatuck Fire District maintains a first responder unit with 11 volunteers because of the
distance from ambulance services. The first responder unit appears to average about 10 calls
per month .
SCHOOLS

Saugatuck is served by the Saugatuck
school district. The school system operates two

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�-

■

6-6

facilities. Douglas Elementary School accommodates grades K through 6 , and Saugatuck High
School accommodates grades 7 through 12. In
addition to being used for educational purposes,
the schools also have indoor and outdoor recreation facilities. Enrollment is approximately 550
students.
OTHER COMMUNI'IY FACllJ.TIES

There is more than 97 acres of public land
in Saugatuck, most of which is parks (see Chapter 7). Other publicly owned facilities are listed
in Table 6. 1.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL

PA 641 of 1978 requires that every county
prepare both a short term (5 year) and long term
(20 years) solid waste management plan. The
plan must be approved by the County Planning
Committee, the County Board of Commissioners
and by at least 2/3 of the municipalities in the
county. The Allegan County Solid Waste Plan
dates from 1983 and covers a twenty year planning period. It is presently being updated.
The County generates about 220 tons per
day of solid waste and has to rely on landfills
outside of Allegan County. Solid waste removal
in Saugatuck is handled entirely by private
haulers. The waste stream from the County, and
thus from the City, is expected to increase due
to population and tourist increases brought
about by the area's shoreline, natural attractions, and proximity to Grand Rapids.
The Saugatuck area is defined in the Solid
Waste Plan and encompasses Saugatuck Township, Saugatuck and Douglas, as well as small
portions of the adjoining communities. The
Saugatuck area currently generates 11.3 tons of
solid waste per day. In some outlying rural
areas, 5-100/4 of the residential waste generated
is disposed of or recycled on site. In urban areas,
approximately 5% of residential waste is being
recycled or scattered by indMdual efforts. The
contributors to the solid waste stream by land
use are shown in Table 6.3.
Table 6 .4 shows the results of a study conducted by the Northeast Michigan Council of
Governments (NEMCOG) in the early 1980's.
The study involved counties with both urban
and rural characteristics. much like the
Saugatuck Township, Saugatuck and Douglas
area. Solid waste generated has been broken
down into specific categories. The numbers
probably do not match the actual breakdown of

TABLE6.3
TONS GENERATED PER DAY
BYLAND USE

SOURCE
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Not Collected

QUANTI1Y (PER DAY)

6.5
2.8
1.8

0.7
-0.5
11.3

NETTOTAL

Source: Allegan County Solid Waste Plan

TABLE6.4
SOLID WASTE COMPOSITION
1YPE

POTSW •

Combustible Wastes
Paper
Plastics
Wood
Yard Wastes
Textiles
Food Wastes
Rubber
Misc. Organics

Percentage (%)
44.8
9.2
3.5
4.1
4.2
11.5
2.2
3.0
82.5

TITTALS

Noncombustible Wastes
Glass
Ferrous
Aluminum
Other nonFerrous
Misc. Inorganics
TITTALS

5.3
6.6
0.8
0.5
4.3
17.5

• Proportion of Total Solid Waste
Source: Allegan County Solid Waste Plan

TABLE6.5
PER CAPITA WASTE GENERATED

USE
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Average Overall

QPE • (LBS. PER DAY)

2.9
5.75

10.6
4.7

• Quantity Per Employee
Source: Allegan County Solid Waste Plan

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�6-7

solid waste components in the trt-community
area, but give a rough estimate of the components.
Per capita waste generated from various
land uses is shown in Table 6 .5.
The Allegan County Solid Waste Plan projects that solid waste output for the Saugatuck
area will increase by 32% by 2000 to 14.95 tons
per day due to projected population increase.
The goals and objectives of the plan focus
on reducing the waste stream through separation and recycling, using private haulers for
waste collection, recovering energy from the
solid waste stream and providing the public with
opportunities to develop solutions for solid
waste disposal problems. A recycling center is
currently in operation on Blue Star Highway
adjacent to 1-196 and exit 41. The center is
partially funded by Saugatuck, Douglas and
Saugatuck Township and is very well used.
Allegan County Resource Recovery maintains
the facility, which collects newspapers, plastics,
glass, aluminum and brown paper bags. Pickup
of metal appliances and tires is also possible by
contacting the center. The recycling center was
started in 1984.
State regulations prohibit operation of a
new landfill on:
• Land considered by the DNR to be a State
recognized unique wildlife habitat.
• Land in the 100 year floodplain.
• Prime agricultural lands.
• A DNR designated and officially mapped
wetland.
• So close to an historic or archaeological site
that it can be reasonably expected to produce unduly disturbing or blighting influence with permanent negative effect.
• In a developed area where the density of
adjacent houses or water wells could be
reasonably expected to produce undue potential for groundwater contamination.
Due to the presence of wetlands in the City
(Map 4 .4), critical dune areas (Map 4.12). land
in the 100 year floodplain (Map 4.3), and areas
susceptible to groundwater contamination (Map
4.10), not much is left for potential landfill sites.
Furthermore, most of those sites which may be
environmentally suitable for landfills have already been developed. Thus it not possible for a
landfill to be located within existing City boundaries.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�I,-------------------•■
N

A

.

,..___
0

600

1200

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

I

I

I

MAP 6.1 PUBLIC FACILITIES
1) City Hall 2) Public Restrooms 3) Waterwell

August 1989

Saugatuck

4) Fire Station 5) Saugatuck High School

Planning &amp; Zoning Cen18r Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
jilFW W

0

--

4,000

8,000

12.000 h

Scale 1• • 9060 ft

MAP 6.2 WATER SYSTEM

I-# IWater Mains

~

Saugatuck

Reservoir

■ Proposed Water Intake &amp;

Treatment area

j O@ Ore
August 1989

I Existing Well Locations
OAT~ SOURCE: Williams &amp; Works, Inc. Grand Rapids

Planning I Zoning Cen18r Inc, Lansing, Ml

�■

I
N

A

MAP 6.3 SEWER SYSTEM

Saugatuck

I~ISewer Lines

1,1 Discharge Line
August 1ffl

DATA SOURCE: Williams &amp; Wor1&lt;a, Inc. Grand Rapid&amp;

Planning &amp; Zoning Centar Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
0

4,000

8,000

12,000 ft

Scale 1" = 9060 ft

MAP 6.4 GAS MAINS
j

Saugatuck

/I Gas Mains

August 1989

SOURCE:Michigan Gas Utilities Company

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc., Lansing.Ml

�,-~-------------------

■

N

A

MAP 6.5 STREET CLASS I Fl CATIONS

[ZJ
[Zl

0

Regional Arterials

I/ I

Saugatuck

Local Streets

Local Arterials

conectors

August 1989

DATA SOURCE: PZC

Planning &amp; Zoning Cenller Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
0

600

Scale 1"

1200

=

1800

1212 ft

wl
MAP6.6 ACT51 ROADS

IZI
0

Saugatuck

Major Street

County Primary

August 1989

DATA SOURCE: MOOT

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�7-1

Chapter7

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
arks, recreation, and open space are essenP
tial to the quality of life of area residents,
and are an important component of the local
tourist economy. They enhance property values,
as well as physical and psychological well-being.
Parks and open space define the character of
each area community, create the scenic atmosphere which stimulates tourism, and provide
the basis for popular local leisure activities.
Recreation needs are regional in nature and
plans must view local recreational offerings as
part of a regional recreational system. Local
governments, schools, private entrepreneurs,
the County, and the State each have a central
role in serving local and regional recreational
needs.
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE

The City of Saugatuck's parks are maintained by the City through its Department of
Public Works. Park planning is done by a committee of three City Council members, who are
overseen by the City Manager and the full Council.
Douglas parks are maintained by the
Village's Department of Public Works under the
Village Council's Parks and Buildings Committee, which reports to the Village Council.
The Township formed a Township Park and
Recreation Commission in November 1970,
which is an independent governmental entity
charged with provision of parks and recreational
programs to area citizens. The Commission has
six elected members, and is staffed by a parttime maintenance person. Representatives from
both Douglas and the Township may be elected
to sit on the Commission. The Commission completed the Saugatuck - Douglas Area Parks and
Recreation Plan in February of 1985 and updates the plan periodically. Revision of the plan
is currently underway.
Allegan County prepares and periodically
updates a countywide parks and recreation
plan. County parks are administered by a tenmember County Parks and Recreation Commission whose members include the Chairs of the
County Road Commission, the County Planning
Commission, the County Drain commissioner,

two County Commissioners, and five members
appointed by the County Board of Commissioners. The Commission meets on the first Monday
of each month. It sometimes provides financial
assistance for local recreational efforts which
advance the County Recreation Plan.
AREAWIDE RECREATIONAL OPPORTIJNITIES
Recreation can be separated into four main
categories: physical, social, cognitive, and environmentally related recreation. The former category focuses on sports and various physical
activities. Social recreation looks at social interaction. Cognitive recreation deals with cultural,
educational, creative, and aesthetic activities.
Environmentally related recreation requires the
natural environment as the setting or focus for
activity. Each of these categories in some way
relates to the others.

Physical Recreation
Intramural athletics are popular for children and young adults in the area and are
offered through the summer recreation program. Activities include softball, baseball,
rocket football, volleyball, bowling and others
(see Table 7.1). The elementary school has a
newly expanded playground and Kid's Stuff
Park. Playgrounds are also found at River Bluff,
TABLE 7.1
SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAMS
ACTIVITI

T-ball for kids
Little League
Pony League
Slow-pitch softball
Fast pitch softball (girls)
Semi-competitive softball (boys)
Rocket football
Swimming: beginner, advanced
beginner, intermediate, swimmer, basic rescue &amp; advanced
lifesaving

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

1989
PARTICIPANTS

40
46
19
10-18
27
15-20
57
66

�.-7-2
TABLE 7.2

INVENTORY OF OUTDOOR RECREATION

. .
• • ... - ...
~i jj I~:
g

u ••

S11:e

l.ocat lon

(acre ■)

g _. -

u ....

:;;

..
•l ;
"' t◄

: !;

I.River Bluff

27

X

X

2,Sundown

.4

X

X

J.&gt;.,aalanchier
S.H. Beerv Field

1.2

X

X

20

X

X

7.union St. Launch
a.center St. Launcl
IO.Villa2e Souare
11 • IJick.s Park.
12.Willow Park.
l).Cook Parlt
14.Soear St. Launch

i

IQ~

X

)I

X

)I

X

JI

X

X

X
X

X

X

X
X

JI

~

X

X

.,-

X

X

-

X

51

X

X

)I

X

16. Oval Beach

36

X

X

X

X X

60*

X

X

X

X
)(

X

X
X

-X

20. Hilth School

X
X

X

X

21. St. Peter's

23. West Wind KOA

X

X

x·

IS.Ht. Baldhead

22. 63rd St. Launch

s; L~

X

X

.s

8.6

X

6a

X

)I

-

19. Elementarv Sch.

◄

X

2.s

154

: ◄ :a

X X

-

17. Tallma2e Woods
18. Old "Airoor.t"

.

I

~

X

X

C:

C

X

1.4

6,Schultz Park

.I11~
..

X JI

4

4. Ooul!.laa Beach

. ...

0
..
: ...
.
j
• ~
.~~ 1.
:: ~ •. : ~ :
~
...
...
ii
3
~
• &lt;
~

X

.--

..:

12

X

X

24. Blue Star Uiway
Roadside Park.

X

X
X

X

X

X

X

X

25. Riveraide Park.

Sundown. Schultz. and Beery Parks and the
Douglas Village Square. Aerobic fitness classes
are offered at the High school. Walking, hiking,
biking, boating, golfing, swimming, and cross
country skiing are also popular. and enjoyed by
a wide range of age groups.

Social Recreation
A variety oflocal clubs and activities provide
social recreation for people of all ages. Festivals,
community education programs, and intramural sports provide an opportunity to socialize.
Senior citizens activities are organized through
the New Day Senior Citizens Club of Douglas.

the High School. the Masonic Hall, and various
area clubs.

Cognitive Recreation
The tri-community area is rich in cognitive
recreational pursuits. Festivals, art workshops,
local theater. historic districts, an archaeological site, summer day camp, and community
education programs provide cultural, educational, and aesthetic enjoyment. The Saugatuck
Women's Club, Rubenstein Music Club, the
Oxbow. Douglas Garden Club. and the Douglas
Art Club are among the local clubs which organize cultural activities.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�7-3

Environmentally Related Recreation
Area lakes, the Kalamazoo River. and state
and local parks provide area citizens with
unique outdoor recreation opportunities. They
provide a location for a variety of outdoor activities including boating, fishing, swimming, nature study. camping, hiking, cross country
skiing, and nature walks. These areas also serve
the cognitive needs of area citizens and tourists
by their scenic beauty and relaxing affect. In
fact. the most valued attribute of area water
bodies and open space to area citizens, as identified in the 1988 Public Opinion Survey, is not
physical recreation. but the scenic view they
provide.
RECREATION INVENTORY

Map 7 .1 identifies parks and recreational
facilities in the tri-community area. Table 7.2
contains an inventory of these outdoor recreation facilities. There are also two eighteen hole
and one nine hole golf courses in the area. This
is much higher than typical for such a small
population (the standard is 1 golf course per
50,000 people). and reflects the impact of tourism on local recreational facilities. A discussion
of the size, condition, and planned improvements for selected area parks is shown in Table
7.3.
Proposed recreation projects contained in
the Saugatuck-Douglas Recreation Plan are
listed in Table 7.4. Table 7.5 includes a schedule
of other planned park and open space acquisitions and improvements.
RECREATIONAL NEEDS AND USAGE

The 1988 Public Opinion Survey highlighted those recreational facilities which residents feel are inadequate in the tri-community
area. Table 7.6 lists these by jurisdiction.

Non-Motorized Trails and Bike Paths
Residents placed highest priority on additional bike paths, cross country skiing routes.
and hiking trails. These needs are currently
served by non-motorized trails in the Oval
Beach/Mt. Baldhead area. The 1985 Saugatuck
- Douglas Parks and Recreation Plan. identified
bicycle trails as a high· priority and prepared a
schedule of capital improvements to achieve this
objective. These improvements have not been
implemented to date.
In 1984. the Saugatuck Township Park and
Recreation Commission developed a list of rec-

ommended bike paths in the tri-community
area. Those recommended for Saugatuck are
shown below in order of priority:
• Park Streets from Campbell to Perryman.
• Oval Beach road.
Those recommended for Douglas are shown
below in order of priority:
• Center Street from Tara to Lake Shore
Drive.
• Ferry Street from Center to Campbell Road.
• Lake Shore Drive from Campbell Road to
the Village limits.
A path on Blue Star Highway from the
bridge to Center Street. which was the Village's
first priority, has already been completed.
Those bike paths recommended in order of
priority for Saugatuck Township are:
• Lake Shore Drive from 130th Avenue to
M-89.

• Holland Streets from Saugatuck to the Y.
• Old Allegan Road from Blue Star Highway
to 60th St.
• Blue Star Highway from 129th Ave . to M89.
The regional bike path system would connect with Saugatuck's chain link ferry to afford
bicyclists east/west access. This connection
runs down Holland Street and across Francis
Street to the waterfront and will be served by
inner city streets. without the need for additional right of way. At this juncture. bicyclists
may ride the chain link ferry to Saugatuck's
eastern border. Once on Saugatuck's eastern
side. bicyclists could follow Saugatuck's proposed bike path system down through Douglas
and south out of the Township. Bike path right
of way would also extend north to Goshorn Lake
along Washington Road. thereby connecting
with Laketown Township. Another future extension could extend the system east along Old
Allegan Road into Manlius Township. This is a
scenic route , although somewhat hilly.
Bicyclists wishing to pass through
Saugatuck and on south through Douglas
would need additional right of way from Lake
Street to the bridge, thereby connecting with the
Douglas bike path network. Douglas in tum
would extend its bike path south on Blue Star
Highway to connect with the Township system.
Map 7.2 shows this proposed regional bike
path network.

Waterfront Open Space
A survey of waterfront usage revealed that
the most popular waterfront activity is viewing.
The second most popular use varied by water-

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�7-4
TABLE 7.3
PARKLAND INVENTORY

~

NAME OF PARK LOCATION

PLANNED
IMPROVEMENTS
1YPE/YEAR

USES

SIZE

CONDITION

pressbox-220
sq.ft., dugouts350 sq.ft., land52,000 sq.ft. 1
acre
beach-36,400
sq.ft. nearly 1
acre, bathhouse280 .ft.
pavillion-1326
sq.ft., land- 20
acres
66'xl20'

pressbox &amp; wash- None
room poor; otherwise good

Dou las

Beery Field

Center &amp; Main
Sts.

baseball. playground, picnic

Douglas Beach

Lakeshore Dr.

public beach &amp;
picnic

Schultz

softball, picnic,
130th &amp;
Kalamazoo River playground,
launchramQ
Union St. at Kal. launch ramp,
River
Qicnic area

Union St.
Launch RamQ
Saug_. Twp_.
River Bluff

Kal River above
1-196 bridge; access from Old Al-

leganRd.
Sundown

Blue Star

Lake MI Bluff at
126thAve.

Blue Star Hwy.
south of Skyline
Restaurant

hilting. picnic,
27 acres
boaters stop, nature study. swinging &amp; sandbox
picnics, watch66'xl50'
ing lakes &amp; sunsets, scenic
turnout
picnics, resting
30'x200'
for travelers

Fair

None

Good

Acquisition/ '89

Good

None

newly installed
entry road &amp; pienicarea. New
dock &amp; picnic
shelter
Very poor

pad for
dumpster/'89,
more ilowers/'89,
toilet improvements/ 1990-92
new fence; needs
landscaping/ 1989-1992

new flowers;
needs new bollards &amp; fence re-

~

fence work/1989,
bollards/ 1989-90

airs

Center St. Park

Saug_atuck
Village Square

I

Eastern end of canoe launching,
picnics, scenic
Center at
Kalamazoo River viewing
Butler &amp; Main
Streets

Wicks Park

Waterfront between Main &amp;
Mary Streets

Willow Park

Waterfront at
Butler &amp; Lucy
Waterfront on
Water Street
Spear Street
streetend

Cook Park
Boat Ramp

3 acres

Poor

tenni.s courts,
drinking fountain,
playground,
benches,
restrooms
bandstand,
boardwalk,
benches, fishing, restrooms
viewing area,
benches
picnic tables

2.5 acres

Good

1/2 acre
approx.

Good

132 ft

Good

132 ft.

Good

boat launch

66 ft.

Good

additional docking, public
restrooms, gazebo

~
City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�7-5
TABLE 7.3 (continued)
PARKLAND INVENTORY

NAME OF PARK
Mt. Baldhead
Park

LOCATION
Park Street

Oval Beach
Park

Lake Michigan

Tallmadge
Woods

USES
picnic shelter, tables, restrooms,
hiking trails, parking, stairway to
obseIVation deck
on top of dune,
two obseIVation
decks on liver
beachhouse,concession stand,
parking, picnic
area. BBQ grills,
viewing deck,
stairs to beach,
obseIVation deck,
nature trails
current use restricted

body. Swimming was the primary use of Lake
Michigan. powerboating for Lake Kalamazoo
and Silver Lake (which also is popular for fishing), and nature study was the most popular for
Kalamazoo River due to its large connecting
wetlands and wide array of wildlife- including a
large population of Great Blue Herons which
have established a rookery in the area.
In accordance with usage. the overwhelming majority of residents in Saugatuck cited
preservation of existing waterfront open space
and increased access to the waterfront as their
highest waterfront need. Acquisition ofland and
provision of access to Lake Michigan was given
highest priority for the waterfront. Open space
along Lake Kalamazoo and the Kalamazoo River
were also given high priority by the majority of
respondents. although the response was higher
in the Village (64-69%) and Township (62%)
than in the City of Saugatuck (48-50%). A large
number ofrespondents also called for additional
boat launching facilities.
Parks
Respondents were asked how frequently
they used various local parks and the overwhelming majority responded "never". Oval
Beach is used most frequently of the area parks
by residents of each jurisdiction. and is used

CONDITION

SIZE
51 acres

Good

36 acres

Good

100 acres

Good

PI.ANNED
IMPROVEMENTS
1YPE/YEAR

new concession
stand &amp;
restrooms/ 1990

most heavily by City residents. Douglas Beach
is also frequently used. Wicks, Schultz, and
Beery park are more frequently used by City and
Village residents. than those in the Township.
It is important to note that survey responses reflect the usage characteristics of older
adults. The average age of survey respondents
was 54 to 56 years old. As the age of respondents
increases, park usage tends to decrease- especially for parks which specialize in active sports.
This reveals the need to orient recreation plans
to the recreational needs of older adults. Thus,
bike paths. waterfront open space/access. hiking trails, and cross country ski trails should
probably receive precedence in future recreation
enhancement projects. over more active park
facilities like ball diamonds.

Senior Citizens Center
Senior citizens in the area have been lobbying for a senior citizens center to serve the social
and recreational needs of the area's elderly population. Saugatuck's survey results do not reflect support for a senior center. Only 25% of
City residents called for a senior center- surprising, given the high proportion of seniors in
the City's resident population.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�.-7-6

TABLE 7.4
PROPOSED RECREATION PROJECTS
TRI-COMMUNITY AREA
PROPOSED PROJECT
VERY HIGH PRIORITY

LOCATION

. Downtown Saugatuck on the river
Willow Park preseivation and improvement
Lake Michigan Shoreline
Acquire extensive land areas
Saugatuck High School
New dug outs - football field
Douglas Elementary School
Renovation of playground equipment
Convert weight room to storage &amp; coach's offices Saugatuck High School
On river in Saugatuck
Remodel Wicks Park restrooms
North of Oval Beach Park
Acquire land to access to Oxbow Lagoon
HIGH PRIORITY

Acquire and improve land for marina and park
Boat launching facility
Develop bicycle trails
Purchase park parcel on hill
Acquire additional land for River Bluff Park
Construct additional public restrooms
Clear and develop Moore's Creek
Rehabilitate tennis courts
Update Village Square Park
Expand and improve Howard Schultz Park
Riverside Park equipment &amp; improvements

Douglas riverfront near bridge
City of Saugatuck
Entire area
In Saugatuck
Adjacent to River Bluff in Township
Downtown Saugatuck
Near Amalanchier Park in Saugatuck Township
Village Square Park - Saugatuck
Village Square Park - Saugatuck
Village of Douglas
Village of Douglas

MEDIUM

Expand underground sprinkling system
Acquire land and develop tot lots
Develop archery range
Beach House rehabilitation
Acquire land for neighborhood park
Construct concession stand

Village Square Park - Saugatuck
All areas
River Bluff Park - Township
Saugatuck Oval Beach
Campbell Road area - Saugatuck &amp; Douglas
Saugatuck High School Athletic Field

LOW

Teen Recreation Center
Install lighting for tennis courts
Develop non-motorized trail
Lighting for tennis courts
Construct additional locker rooms

Downtown Saugatuck
Schultz Park
Schultz Park
Village Square Park - Saugatuck
Saugatuck High School

Source: Saugatuck - Douglas Area Parks and Recreation Plan, Feb. 1985.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�7-7
RECREATION AND LOCAL SPENDING

In terms of priorities for spending current
tax dollars, 42-48% of respondents in the tricommunity area felt that parks and recreation
are a high priority. Waterfront improvement was
rated high by City respondents. Senior programs were given low local spending priority in
the City, despite the high average age ofrespondents.

Although they would like to have them,
most respondents would not support a community recreation center, a senior center, or a
community pool if it meant an increase in general property taxes.

TABLE 7.5
PLANNED ACQUISITIONS/IMPROVEMENTS TO PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
WCATION
East side
UruonSlKal. Lake,
North of Blue
Star (Douglas)
Landlocked
RuthMcNamara property end of Schultz
Park (Douglas)
Vacant Lot
Blue Star &amp;
Main St.
(Douglas)
Old
SE 1/4 SecSaugatuck
tlon 2
(Saugatuck)
Airport
NAME
Esther McSic
property

ACQUISITION
COST($)
185,000

IMPROVEMENf
FINANCING
DNRLand
Trust

USE
Public open
space

SIZE
CONDITION
124,000 sq.ft. Marshy
(portion under
water) vacant

Park

132,000
Dry
sq.ft. (vacant)

NA

NA

Future park

land 18,000
sq.ft.: nearly
1/2 acres
154 acres

65,000

NA

CUrrently forestry management. possible
future recreation

Dry

TABLE 7.6
RECREATION NEEDS IN THE TRI-COMMUNITY AREA
1988 PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY
Cl1Y

VILLAGE

TOWNSHIP

Bike paths (68%)
Hiking trails (62%)
Cross-country ski trails (62%)
Lake MI open space (61 %)
Lake Kal. open space (50%)

Lake MI open space (70%)
Lake Kal. open space (69%)
Bike paths (67%)
Kal. River open space (64%)
Parks (50%)

Lake MI open space (67%)
Bike paths (64%)
Lake Kal. open space (62%)
Kal. River open space (62%)
Cross-country ski trails (60%)

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�N

+

A

.,·
••..1

O

4,000

8,000

,····......,-··

12,000 ft

,,·· ,

~-0 AVC ,

Scale 1" = 9060 ft

2.5

"'

/j "

----. .·...... .

..

'·

.

,

l, TJN,RIIW
•.,

, ....

('
, . .•· •

55

M-89

SAUGATUCK TWP.

MAP7.1 OUTDOOR RECREATION SITES Saugatuck
1) - 25) See Chapter 7, Table 7.2
26) West Shore Gott Course 27) Clearbook Gott Course 28) Mi-Ro Gottcourse 29) Center Street

August 1989

DATA SOURCE :Saug. - Doug . Parks &amp; Rec. Plan. 1985

Planning &amp; Zoning Cenl&amp;r Inc, Lansing, Ml

�N

A
0

600

1200

1800

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

L

•

KALAMAZOO LAKE

MAP 7.2 PROPOSED BIKE PATHS
~

Proposed Bike Paths

~

Chain Link Ferry

August 1989

DATA SOURCE: Saugatuck Township Par1&lt; and Recreation Commission

Saugatuck

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�8-1

Chapters

WATERFRONT

S

augatuck was the first settlement in Allegan .
County. Its natural protected harbor along
the Kalamazoo River and proximity to Lake
Michigan gave it a ready means of water transport- essential to the commerce of the day.
Throughout its history. land use actMties along
the Lake Michigan shoreline and the riverfront
have continued to dominate the economic life of
the tri-community area. Lumbering, boat building, basket making, fruit transport. and even
large Great Lakes passenger boats have, at different times, relied upon the River connection.
Tourists have always been attracted to the area,
but tourism is now the number one economic
actMty. Today's waterfront activities are dominated by tourist and pleasure craft needs. especially sailboats, powerboats, charter fishing
boats and other tourist boats. Consequently,
how the waterfront is used will be of crucial
importance to the future of the tri-community
area.
The primary issues concerning proper future use of the waterfront involve competition
between economic development and environmental protection. Waterfront lands represent
the highest value lands in the tri-community
area. and local officials are therefore concerned
about the potential tax base associated with use
of waterfront lands. In order to finance the
service needs of local residents. the tri-communities must balance taxable and nontaxable
land uses. This presents a dilemma. Although
waterfront lands have high revenue generating
potential, a major attraction of both the Lake
Michigan and Kalamazoo River waterfronts is
their scenic, natural shorelines composed of
forested sand dunes and large wetland areas.
Should these natural areas be greatly damaged
or destroyed through inappropriate development, then the "goose that laid the golden egg"
will be dead.
It is essential that the natural beauty of the
waterfront be maintained along the Lake Michigan shoreline, the Kalamazoo River from the
channel to Saugatuck. and from the Blue Star
Highway bridge inland. Limited additional development along the waterfront on Lake
Kalamazoo and the Douglas side of the bayou
east of Blue Star Highway may be both desirable

and necessary. However, such development
must be undertaken carefully to maintain the
delicate balance between economic development
and environmental protection.
It is both necessary and possible to manage
the waterfront for a variety of purposes. Yet it is
always difficult to manage for multiple uses.
Some individuals value land management to
retain the necessary habitat for birds, fish and
wildlife. Others feel it should be managed to
maximize surface water use, or for intensive
waterfront dependent actMties like ship building or power generation. Based on some of the
technical data presented below. existing use
information, citizen opinions. and the goals and
objectives presented at the beginning of this
Plan. the waterfront in the tri-community area
can, and should, be managed to accommodate
a wide range of land uses and activities.
This Plan seeks to define a balance between
competing uses. It places protection of the natural environment as first and foremost in making future land use decisions along the Lake
Michigan and Kalamazoo River waterfronts. The
ultimate goal is to minimize disruption of the
natural environment so that new development
is in harmony with the environment. rather than
in conflict with it. Some destruction of the limited remaining wetland areas along Lake
Kalamazoo is only justified where the public
benefits of particular projects are very great (e.g.
a public marina or additional public access to
the waterfront).
Watersheds of the Kalamazoo River Basin
The Kalamazoo River extends from south of
Homer in Hillsdale and Jackson Counties to its
outlet at Lake Michigan in Saugatuck Township
(see Figure 4 . 1) . With the exception of lands
adjoining Lake Michigan (which drain directly
into the Lake) and a small area in the southeast
comer of Saugatuck Township, all land in the
tri-community area is part of the Kalamazoo
River Basin.
Eight small watershed areas lie within the
tri-community area and discharge into Lake
Michigan via the Kalamazoo River (see Map 8.1) .
These include Goshorn, Peach Orchard. Tan-

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

i,
I

�8-2

nery, Silver and "Cemetery" Creeks, as well as
the Morrison Bayou at the eastern end of the
Kalamazoo River as it enters the Township. Most
of Douglas and Saugatuck also drain separately
into the Kalamazoo River and Lake Kalamazoo.
Slopes in the area are generally less than 10
percent though locally they may be in excess of
20 percent. Runoff erosion is taking place in the
highlands, contributing sediment to backswamp areas and Lake Michigan.
Monthly (exceedance) flows for the
Kalamazoo River, based on a 1649 square mile
drainage area near Fennville (#0410B500, T2n,
Rl4W, NE 1/4 Sec 5), were averaged from measurements taken between 1929 to 1985 by the
Hydrologic Engineering Section, Land and
Water Management Division, MDNR Estimates
based on these measurements were then prepared for the larger drainage area of 2060 square
miles at the mouth of the Kalamazoo River (T3N,
Rl6W, Sec 4, Saugatuck Township).
Ninety-five percent and fifty percent exceedance flows are shown in Table 8.1. These are
flows exceeded 95% or 500/4 of the time. The
lowest 95% exceedance flow in Fennville (nearly
drought level) was measured during August at
410 cfs, and is estimated to be 520 cfs at the
mouth of the Kalamazoo River. The 500/4 exceedance flow in Fennville ranged from a low of 860
cfs during the summer months to 2010 cfs
TABLE 8.1
KALAMAZOO RIVER
EXCEEDANCE FLOWS (1929-85)
MONTHLY AVERAGE
CUBIC FT /SECOND
FENNVILLE

janua:ry
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

RIVER MOUTH

500/4

95%

500/4

95%

1350
1400
1950
2010
1600
1250
970
860
860
980
1210
1300

710
790
1010
1040
830
630
480
410
480
520
650
750

1690
1750
2430
2510
2000
1560
1210
1070
1070
1220
1510
1620

890
990
1260
1300
1040
790
600

520
600
650
810
940

Source: Hydrologlc En~eertnfuSection, Land and
Water Resources DMs on, Mic gan Department of
Natural Resources.

during April. Corresponding estimates for the
mouth of the Kalamazoo River ranged from 1070
cfs during the summer months to 2510 cfs
during April.
The 100 year discharge is estimated at
15,400 cfs at the mouth of the Kalamazoo River,
and 12,500 cfs at the Fennville gage.

~

PRIMARY ECOSYS'IEMS

The tri-community area has three basic
ecosystems, two of which parallel the waterfront. The first ecosystem is comprised of hardwoods holding the sand dunes in place along the
Lake Michigan shoreline. These woodlots are
inhabited by small game such as fox squirrels,
rabbits, raccoons, deer, wild turkey, and opossums. This ecosystem is comprised of fauna
common to most of Michigan. but its balance is
easily upset by the disruption of its shallow
organic soils. Any ground cover that is damaged
or removed should be quickly replaced with
cover that will hold and prevent sand from blowing or rapid wind erosion may occur. Michigan's
most famous ghost town, Singapore, once a
thrivinglumbertown, lies beneath these shifting
sands near the mouth of the channel.
The second ecosystem is the marsh-wetland ecosystem that covers the area along the
Kalamazoo River, Silver Lake and Goshorn Lake,
and the connecting tributaries. This area is
covered with marsh grasses, low shrubs, poplar
trees, spruces, some white pine, and other softwoods. The cover is inhabited by common Michigan marsh dwellers such as frogs, turtles,
ducks, blackbirds, and snakes. The marsh ecosystem is also populated by muskrat, mink,
mallard duck, black duck, teal, wood duck, blue
heron, Canadian geese. and mute swans.
Golden eagle and osprey used to frequent the
area. The marsh ecosystem is very sensitive to
changes in water quality and disruption of vegetation. Great care must be taken to limit siltation and disruption to vegetation when working
in this ecosystem.
The third ecosystem covers the rest of the
Township and is predominantly agricultural/forest with birds and wildlife common to
this dominant ecosystem in Michigan.
The entire Saugatuck/Douglas area is designated as an area of particular concern by the
DNR Areas of particular concern are those having scarce resources, unusual scenic beauty,
unusual economic value, recreational attractions, or some combination of the above. They
are only located in coastal areas. Altering the

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

~

~

""\

�8-3

environment in an area of "particular concern"
could have a significant impact on the quality of
coastal and Great Lakes waters.
WATER QUALITY

The Kalamazoo River watershed includes
many types of land uses and the River flows
through several large developed urban areas
including Kalamazoo and Battle Creek. When it
reaches the tri-community area, the quality of
this water is not good. Despite the water quality
problem, the River from about one-half mile
downstream from the Hacklander Public Access
Site (in Section 23) , has been designated as a
"wild-scenic river" under Michigan's Natural
River Act, Public Act 231 of 1970. Land use
restrictions have been imposed to retain its
natural character within 300 feet of the River's
edge.
The basic water management goal is the
elimination of the pollution threat to surface and
groundwater resources. The Kalamazoo River is
designated by the DNR to be protected for recreation (partial body contact) , intolerant fish
(warm water species). industrial water supply,
agricultural and commercial uses. Downstream
from the Kalamazoo Lake, the river is protected

for cold water anadromus fish species (trout and
salmon). Kalamazoo Lake and Goshorn Lake are
designated to be protected for recreation (total
body contact) , and intolerant fish (warm water
species). These water management objectives
are nearly ten years old, but there have been no
concerted efforts to update them and cany them
out. A push to revise the objectives is underway
statewide, but it could be years before any action
plans are carried out for the Kalamazoo River.
1988 Public Opinion Survey results reveal
that citizens in the tri-community area feel that
the water quality of the Kalamazoo River and
Lake is poor to very poor (58%-700Ai). Lake Michigan is rated fair to good (31-50%). and most
respondents familiar with the water quality of
Silver Lake felt that it was fair. The majority of
respondents who are familiar with these water
bodies, feel that the water quality of Lake Michigan and Silver Lake has deteriorated slightly in
recent years, and Kalamazoo River and
Kalamazoo Lake has deteriorated slightly to
greatly . Most respondents who reside in
Saugatuck, however, felt that the water quality
has stayed about the same.
Basic water quality data on the River appears in Table 8.2 for selected months in 1978,

TABLES.2
KALAMAZOO RIVER WATER QUALITY
FECAL
COLIFORM
PER lOOML

PHOSPHOROUS
TOTAL OR1HO
MG/L MG/L

NITROGEN

SEDIMENIS

MG/L

HEAVY METALS
MERCURY
MG/L
MG/L

LEAD

N02 N03

MG/L TONS/DAY

Fennville
1/27/88
5/18/88
7/28/88
9/21/88

Saugatuck
3/19/86
6/25/86
9/11/86
Saugatuck
1/10/78
5/1/78
7/20/78
9/11/78

28
96

.05
.04
.08
.07

.01
&lt;.01
&lt;.01
.02

1.4
0.5
0 .67
0.64

5
26
17
39

29
102
30
202

200
200

.08
.11
.14

.02
.02
.01

1.6
0.88
0 .39

21
13
21

161
102
103

.07
.12
.12
.15

NR
NR
NR
NR

1.7
0.34
0.54
0 .00

9
20
15
28

27
123
26
72

120
69

NR • Not Reported
Source: USGS Water Resource Data For Michigan, Water Resources Division, U.S. Geologic Survey.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

&lt;5

&lt;. l

&lt;5

&lt;.l

&lt;5

&lt;.l

&lt;5

&lt;. l

20
10

&lt;.5
&lt;.5
.5

�8-4

1986, and 1988. The sampling point was moved
from Saugatuck to Fennville in 1987. This data
reveals an increase in sedimentation and a decline in heavy metals. It also shows an increase
in fecal coliform (intestinal bacteria) levels to
200/100 ml at the former testing site in
Saugatuck- the maximum level permitted
under rule 62 of the MDNR Water Resources
Commission General Rules of 1986. Phosphorous and certain nitrogen levels have not
changed appreciably in the past ten years.
The Kalamazoo River between Calkins Dam
and Lake Michigan has been designated an Area
of Concern in the 1988 Michigan Nonpoint
Source Management Plan (MNSMP). due to contamination of fish from PCB's. The primary
source of contamination was identified as PCB
contaminated sediments upstream in the
Kalamazoo River and Portage Creek. These sediments continue to erode, resuspend, and dissolve PCB's into the water column where they
are transported downstream.
Due to the presence of PCB's, advisories are
in effect for consumption of fish caught in the
Kalamazoo River or Lake Michigan. The advisory
warns against any consumption of carp, suckers, catfish, and largemouth bass taken from the
Kalamazoo River downstream from the Morrow
Pond Dam to Lake Michigan and Portage Creek
downstream from Monarch Millpond. Limited
consumption of other species (no more than one
meal per week) is considered safe for all except
nursing mothers, pregnant women, women who
intend to have children, and children age 15 and
under.
In Lake Michigan limited consumption of
Lake Trout 20-23", Coho Salmon over 26",
Chinook Salmon 21-32". and Brown Trout up to
23" is considered safe for all except nursing
mothers, pregnant women, women who intend
to have children, and children age 15 and under.
Individuals should not consume carp, catfish,
or Lake Trout, Brown Trout. or Chinook which
fall outside of the acceptable size for limited
consumption.
To address the PCB problem, the MNSMP
has devised a Remedial Action Plan with the goal
ofreducing human exposure to acceptable levels
(1: 100,000) and thus reducing fish tissue concentration to a maximum .05 mg/kg and reducing water column levels to .02 ng/1. Actions
taken to address the problem include: strict
controls on direct discharges of PCB's; a feasibility study of remedial alternatives; funding
through State Act 307 to take remedial action at
three sites; and legal action and negotiations

with private parties at two other sites (see
MNSMP, November 7, 1988, p. 328).
Efforts initiated in the '70's to identify and
require extensive treatment of pollutants prior
to their dumping into the River will continue to
slowly improve the quality of the water. As the
nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen are removed from wastewater entering the River, less
new plant life will be stimulated and more oxygen will be available for fish.
One of these efforts is the Michigan Water
Resources Commission Act, which requires all
discharges into the water to have discharge
permits. In addition, the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act established the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit
program. Under these laws, any public or private facility which will emit any point-source
discharge into the water must first receive a
NPDES discharge permit. The permit program
sets forth limitations and monitoring requirements to protect water quality and meet treatment standards, and establishes strong
enforcement actions for violations. The Surface
Water Quality Division, MDNR, administers
NPDES permits. NPDES permits issued in the
tri-community area are shown on Table 8.3.
However, sedimentation and nonpoint
sources of pollution will remain a problem. In
contrast to pipes that discharge directly into a
waterbody, nonpoint sources of pollution include those pollutants that do not originate from
a single point- such as fertilizer and pesticide
runoff from farmers fields and petroleum based
pollutants that wash off parking lots and roadways. The most obvious pollutants are the physical litter and debris that are carelessly dumped
into the River or Lake and which typically wash
up along the shore.
Michigan's 1988 Nonpoint Pollution Assessment Report concluded that 99% of
Michigan's watersheds have at least one waterbody with a non-point source pollution problem.
In-place contamination and atmospheric deposition were listed as the primary non-point
sources of pollution for the Kalamazoo River.
Stronger efforts to improve water quality
will have a positive affect on tourism, recreation,
and future growth and development of the tricommunity area. All sources of pollution affect
water quality, and hence the utility of the water
resource. While the tri-community area must
rely on outside agencies to enforce pollution
control laws upstream, some efforts can be undertaken by Saugatuck, Douglas and
Saugatuck Township to improve water quality

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�8-3
TABLE8.3
NPDES PERMITS ISSUED IN THE TRI-COMMUNITY AREA
PERMIT RECIPIENT ADDRESS

DISCHARGE

Culligan

processed
wastewater
treated municipal
waste
900,000 gal/ day
purged groundwater, purgable halocarbons
12,000 gal/day
non-contact cooling water &amp; cooling
tower blowdown

Kal. Lake Water &amp;
Sewer Authority
Kalamazoo Lake
Groundwater

201 Culver St. ,
Saugatuck
340 Culver St.,
Saugatuck
6449 Old Allegan
Rd., Saugatuck

Purge

1\vp.

Rich Products

350 Culver St.,
Saugatuck

WCATION
Kalamazoo Lake
via storm sewers
Kalamazoo River
outfall 001
Kalamazoo River
outfall 001

Kalamazoo River
via storm sewer

EXPIRATION DAIB

1991
1990
1993

1990

Source: MDNR Surface Water Quality Division

TABLE8.4
LAKE MICHIGAN LAKE LEVELS
YEAR

WWESTEL
FEETAS.L.

MONTI-I

HIGHEST EL MONTI-I
FEET A.S.L.

1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988

578.00
578.12
578.31
578.92
578.51
578.17
578.85
579.02
579.57
580.36
578.96
578. 10

February
March
February
December
February
March
February
February
February
February
December
December

578.57
579.01
580.02
579.77
579.43
579.02
580.08
580.23
580.84
581.62
580.65
579.04

July
October
April
July
July
April
July
July
June
October
January
May

DIFFERENCE DIFFERENCE
IN FEET
IN INCHES

.57
.89
1.75
.85
.92
.85
1.25
1.21
1.27
1.26
1.69
.94

6.84
10.68
20.52
10.20
11.04
10.20
15.00
14.52
15.24
15.12
20.28
11.28

Source: The Michi&amp;an Riparian, May 1989

and prevent further pollution within the tricommunity area. These will be discussed further
later in this Chapter.
LAKE LEVELS

The natural level of the Great Lakes goes
through periodic changes that are based predominantly on rainfall and evaporation within
the entire Great Lakes Basin. Since a century
peak in 1986, Lake Michigan has steadily fallen
to its current level of around 578 feet (see Table
8.4).

The Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo Lake and
Lake Michigan are interconnected. Thus, water
levels on the River and Lake Kalamazoo are
largely dependent on Lake Michigan water levels. Consequently, land uses adjoining the waterfront should be based on the vagaries of
fluctuating Lake Michigan water levels. This has
not always been done as was evident by extensive shore erosion and flooding during the last
high water period.
When water levels are high "no-wake"
zones, which are always in effect from the channel to Mason Street in Saugatuck, are extended

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�8-6

to cover all of the Kalamazoo Lake shoreline and
parts of the River east of Blue Star Highway (see
Map 8.2). When a "no-wake" speed is in effect.
then all motor boats and vessels must limit
speed to a slow no-wake speed when within 100
feet of:
•rafts.except for ski jumps and ski landing
floats;
• docks;
• launching ramps;
• swimmers;
• anchored. moored or drifting boats; and
• designated no-wake zones.
This means a speed slow enough that the
wake or wash of the boat creates a minimum
disturbance. Owners and operators are responsible for damage caused by wakes.

HARBOR
Map 8.3 is the existing harbor map (June
1987) distributed by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. It depicts water
depth for the shoreline along Lake Michigan.
and the River through Kalamazoo Lake. Channel depth is maintained by periodic dredging to
a depth of 13 feet to Main Street in Saugatuck.
(Dredging at the mouth of the channel is to begin
in July 1990 and be completed in the Fall of
1990.) The depth then drops to 20-27 feet for the
next 500 feet. Between that point and Tower
Marine, the water depth is about 7 feet. Most of
the rest of Lake Kalamazoo varies between 1 and
4 feet in depth with not more than 2 feet being
the most common. The Douglas shoreline. east
of Blue Star Highway is only 1-2 feet in depth
except for a small area running NW-SE from the
center of the bridge and connecting to the Point
Pleasant Yacht Club.
This natural harbor is the principal attraction for nautical tourists which flock to the area
during summer months when the marinas are
used to capacity. Hundreds rent dockage by the
season. Many live on their boats for weeks on
end. The demand for dockage appears to be
greater than the supply. despite the huge number of slips available (see Map 8.4). In 1976 there
were 8 marinas with approximately 800 slips. In
1989, there are 26 legally operating marinas
with 966 slips. There are about half dozen marinas without current permits and these contain
over 30 more slips. There are also a number of
slips maintained by private residences for their
own personal use.
Marina permits are required for any commercial activity, so as few as two slips could

require a marina permit if they are rented. Permits are issued for a three year period by the
DNR On peak summer weekends the number
of boats on the lake could be twice to thrice the
normal level. This presents one of the most
serious problems jointly facing the tri-community area- how to deal with surface water use
conflicts.
The Lake has a total surface water area of
184 acres. Acreage available for recreational
boating is dramatically reduced by the dockage
which extends into the Lake hundreds of feet
and by the shallow water at the edge to about
133 acres. Yet. on summer weekends the River
is a constant highway of boats moving in and
out of the Lake. Recreational sailing. fishing,
swimming. sailboarding and water skiing are
limited by all of the motorboat traffic. However,
durtng the week, other water surface actMties
can go on without much interference.
MARINE SAFETY

The Allegan County Sheriffs Department.
Marine Safety DMsion, maintains strict control
of the waterways. The Department has 8 marine
officers. Normally. two officers patrol by boat.
but three to four officers patrol during holidays
and special events. Officers patrol in a 2 7 foot
Boston Whaler with two 150 horsepower outboard motors. This boat is equipped for Lake
Michigan rescue, and has a noise meter which
monitors the 86 decibel noise limit.
From Memorial Day to Labor Day officers
put in 635 hours of patrol duty on Kalamazoo
River and Kalamazoo Lake. One hundred and
ten hours were spent patrolling Lake Michigan.
Most patrols occur between Friday and Sunday.
and about half of the Department's budget goes
to patrolling the Saugatuck area.
In the summer of 1989, 189 tickets were
issued on Kalamazoo River and Kalamazoo
Lake. 11 were issued on Lake Michigan. 276
warnings were issued, 10 complaints were received, and 6 boating accidents occurred. The
Department also conducted 378 safety inspections. The most common violations are inadequate life preservers on board and lack of
current registration.
The Department notes that slow/no wake,
and hazardous violations were down in the summer of 1989. The most common surface water
use conflicts identified by the Sheriffs Department include sailboat and motorboat conflicts
and complaints over the noise and attitude ofjet

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

0I"

�8-7

skiers. Conflicts between sailboats and motorboats are most common on Saturday.
EXISTING LAND USE
Existing land use ts described in detail in
Chapter 5. All land uses along the waterfront are
oriented to the water. The bulk of the waterfront
in the Township from the channel to the City is
developed as single family residential. The City
and Village waterfronts are predominantly residential and marina. The balance of the waterfront. which lies in the Township, is in a natural
state with some areas of residential development
(such as along Silver Lake). Many commercial
establishments (mostly motels and restaurants)
are also located here. Except for the Broward
Boat Company near the channel, there are no
industrial activities along the waterfront. A
number of small parks are located along the

waterfront. but there are few public access sites
and, except for Shultz Park. these proVide little
space for transient parking.
CONFLICTS/PROBLEMS
At an interjurtsdictional meeting on water

front issues on November 1986, five key issues
were identified:
• high water and its impacts
• development and acquisition of public
lands along the waterfront;
• limiting the intensity of shoreline development;
• preservtng the scenic character of the
shoreline enVironrnent retaining Visual access to. of the
• surface water use conflicts.
Each of these remain important issues as
shown in the 1988 Public Opinion Survey.

FIGURE 8.1

LINKAGE PLAN

J-t

R-2

R-1

R·2

~(commercial)

~wetland

·

AG.
10 I

Source: Conaerve Oakland County•• Natural Reaourcea: A Manual for Planntni &amp;: Implementation,
Department of Public Works, Oakland County, MI. September 1980.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�8-8

High Water
When Great Lakes water levels are high,
erosion along the Lake Michigan shoreline increases. The impacts of erosion are clear along
Lakeshore Drive, where part of the road has
been washed away. Many high value homes will
be threatened by additional erosion in this area.
Erosion along the River and Lake
Kalamazoo also increases with higher Lake
Michigan water levels. Many bulkheads and
similar shore protection devices were installed
to minimize the effects of the most recent high
water level. Raising some of the land and structures would be necessaxy if lake levels remained
high for lengthy periods. On the positive side,
the south shore of Lake Kalamazoo becomes
more attractive to marina development when
water levels are high since it is very shallow in
this area. Likewise, when water levels are below
average, some existing dockage is unusable.
Fluctuating lake levels are part of a natural
system. The costs and implications of trying to
artificially manage the entire Great Lakes Basin
to maintain even Lake levels is not known. but
waterfront land use decisions in the tri-community area should be made based on the assumption that Lake Michigan water levels cannot be
artificially maintained.
Acquisition and Development
of Public Lands Along the Waterfront
Two types of public lands are needed along
the waterfront. One is parkland/ open space and
the other is a public marina. Existing open space
along the waterfront should be preserved (see
Map 8.5). Several street ends provide needed
relief from structures along the shoreline. These
public open spaces are generally well managed,
and efforts should be initiated to ensure that
they are not lost. Existing parks along the shoreline should also be linked together. and with
other inland parks, by pedestrian and bicycle
paths whenever the opportunity arises (see Figure 8.1).
The lack of parkland along the Lake Michigan shoreline is most acute for Township residents. and somewhat less severe for Village
residents. Outside of purchasing and developing
new land for parks, the tri-cornmunities should
consider establishing a separate park and recreation authority responsible for maintaining all
parks presently owned by the three communities. The benefit would be providing access to
Oval Beach by Village and Township residents
and spreading the fiscal responsibility for main-

tenance across more taxpayers. This would also
make it more feasible to acquire additional park
space as needed. Because residents of three
jurisdictions would benefit, grant requests
would probably be more favorably reviewed.
Public marina space is also needed as there
are only three public access sites along Lake
Kalamazoo and the River presently. and two are
too far inland for most daily boaters. The third
is a street end in Saugatuck and has no adjacent
parking. Private marinas provide transient
berthing opportunities, but there is considerable demand for more. By having a facility to
attract more transient boaters, the three communities would be gaining additional tourist
income.
The three most logical places for such a
facility are: 1) immediately adjacent to the Blue
Star Highway bridge in Douglas and extending
to the existing launch facility adjacent to the
Kewatin: 2) converting the Center Street maintenance facility in Douglas to a public marina;
3) at some distant time (or if the opportunity
arose) by replacing the Rich Products office
building in Saugatuck with a public·marina and
accompanying parking. Alternatively. if adjacent parking could be secured, the street end
next to Gleason's in Saugatuck could be a good
public access point.
While the public opinion survey did not
reflect overwhelming support for a public marina, there appears to be demand for such a
facility from persons outside the tri-community
area. Its long term economic benefits may well
justify its cost. especially if state or federal funds
could be secured to help pay for it.

Limiting the Intensity of Development
The primaxy future development of waterfront lands in the City will be redevelopment of
existing parcels. In the Village it will focus on
further development along the South Shore of
Lake Kalamazoo. In both areas it will be critical
that new development is neither so dense, nor
so high as to block existing public views of the
waterfront or further "wall" the Lake with structures. Recommendations to prevent this are
included in Chapter 10. It will be critical that all
three communities agree to a common approach
to waterfront development, embody that in land
use plans. and then implement those plans. To
some extent. uniform densities. setbacks. and
height regulations will be valuable, especially
around Lake Kalamazoo.
Additional development around Silver Lake
needs to remain at a very low density in keeping

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�8-9

with the septic limitations of the land and the
limited recreational value of this shallow waterbody. The eastern end of the Kalamazoo River
should likewise receive little new development
in keeping with its Natural River designation.

Retaining Visual Access, Aesthetics
and the Character of the Area
As has been emphasized throughout this
Plan, the natural beauty of the waterfront has
much to do with the attraction of the tri-community area. Local development regulations
should be reviewed and revised if necessary, to
insure that new development complements,
rather than detracts from this natural beauty.
Old vessels should not be permitted to lie
beached along the shoreline, because this also
detracts from the beauty and character of the
waterfront.
Several vistas have public values that deserve protection. These include the entry into
and exit from Lake Michigan on the Kalamazoo
River, the view from Mount Baldhead, the view
of Kalamazoo Lake from both ends, and approaches to the Kalamazoo River Bridge. The
public opinion survey strongly supports the provision of additional open space along Lake
Kalamazoo and the Kalamazoo River and demonstrates that the prtmary use of the area's
water bodies is viewing. Yet, recent development
pressures have led to overbuilding of condominiums along the waterfront, shutting off all public
viewing of the lake from existing rights-of-way.
Any future development along the channel
should be set back sufficiently to maintain the
broad open views that are presented to boat
travelers entering or leaving the Kalamazoo
River. The view from the top of Mount Baldhead
should be improved by careful selective pruning
of dead or dying trees blocking good views of
Saugatuck and Lake Kalamazoo. The curve
going northbound on Blue Star Highway in
Douglas just before crossing the bridge is the
only good panorama of Kalamazoo Lake. A public turnoff, the acquisition of a scenic easement,
or the concentration of new development on the
western portion of those undeveloped lands
should be initiated to protect that important
view. In addition, the land adjacent to the west
side of the bridge in Douglas should be selectively pruned to improve the view to travelers
crossing the bridge (northbound) until a public
marina could be established there.

Surface Water Use Coriflicts
Resolution of surface water use conflicts
will require more planning and a uniform approach to regulation. Most important is establishing the carrying capacity of Lake Kalamazoo
and the River to the channel mouth. Carrying
capacity refers to the physical capacity and
intrinsic suitability of lands (and water) to absorb and support various types of development
(or use). Such an analysis is typically performed
by an inventory of existing surface water use
during weekdays and peak weekends. Data is
then examined in terms of the size of the waterbody and its capacity to assimilate various
mixes of use. Such an analysis would probably
reveal some, but not much excess capacity for
new boat slips, because any number of boaters
can access Kalamazoo Lake from Lake Michigan.
Without an analysis of carrying capacity,
the amount of new boat slip development and
related surface water use conflicts are difficult
to evaluate. Some time or surface zoning could
be established in conjunction with the DNR if
desired. For example, water skiing, jet skiing,
fishing, sailing, etc, could be limited to particular parts of Lake Kalamazoo or Silver Lake or to
particular times of the day. Another option could
be a harbor patrol paid for by all three governmental units. More information is necessary to
establish the need for regulation. If surface
water use is regulated, each unit of government
would need to agree to a common regulatory
approach.
Surface water use conflicts will grow more
acute on Lake Kalamazoo if existing dockage is
extended much further into the Lake. Such
extensions should not be permitted as the surface area available for various recreational uses
will be too drastically reduced. Existing no-wake
zones should also be more rigorously enforced.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO GUIDE FUrURE USE

In seeking to balance economic development with environmental protection, the concept of carrying capacity should be a major
consideration. If the carrying capacity of land or
water is exceeded, then actMties cannot be
undertaken without unacceptable impacts on
users, the environment, or both. Impacts can
include increased trip times, decreased safety.
pollution, loss of open space, and many other
considerations. The key is prevention of overuse
by limiting intensity of use on adjoining lands
and regulating surface water use.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�8-10

Environmental protection must be a leading principle in making future land use decisions along the waterfront. Environmentally
sensitive areas such as sand dunes, wetlands,
high risk erosion areas, floodplains, and key
woodlands should be protected from unnecessary destruction. Development should complement rather than destroy these areas and their
values. By doing so the environmental quality of
the air and water will be improved, wildlife habitat will be preserved, scenic values will be protected, and the character of the area will be
maintained. Some new intensive shoreline development will be desirable and necessary, but
the balance should not be disproportionately on
the side of new tax base as it has been for the
past decade.
Opportunities to enhance the waterfront
should be seized. Parks and open spaces should
eventually be linked with other public places.
Additional access to the waterfront should be
acquired when available, and existing access via
street ends and parks should not be lost through
neglect or inaction. A new public marina should
be constructed if resources are available and the
cost could be spread among local citizens and
other users (such as through grants or user
fees). Visual access from public thoroughfares
and walkways should be maintained in all new
waterfront development.
Protection mechanisms, like the Natural
River designation, should be recognized for the
ancillary benefits they bring to the community.
A local "Friends of the Riverff organization could
be instituted to annually adopt and clean up the
shoreline to remove floating debris, other waste,
and downed timber that become lodged there. A
special effort to maintain the character of
Lakeshore Drive along the Lake Michigan shoreline should also be initiated.
A comprehensive stormwater management
plan and wetlands protection plan should be
instituted as part of a broad water quality protection program that is based on the small watersheds that feed the Kalamawo River Basin.
The Soil Conservation Service should be asked
to assist in preparing nonpoint pollution guidelines to help guide farmers in land management
practices that help keep the River clean.

spectjurisdiction boundaries. Their future quality and desirability depends on all governmental
units through which they flow playing an active
and supportive role in protecting and improving
water quality. To advance this goal, the jointly
appointed waterfront committee should be reinstituted or its responsibilities shifted to the Joint
Planning Committee which helped fashion this
Plan.

NEED FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COOPERATION

Each of these recommendations requires a
strong degree of intergovernmental cooperation.
Watercourses. like the environment, do not re-

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�N

A

Saugatuck

MAPS.1 WATERSHEDS

·1.•j
[#,

Kalamazoo River Basin Boundary

[2]

Creeks &amp; Drains

Small Watershed Areas:

1) Douglas 2) Tannery Creek 3) Peach Orchard Creek 4) Kalamazoo/Morrison Bayou 5) Ash Drain
6) Silver Lake Creek 7) Goshorn Creek 8) "Cemetery" Creek 9) River Bluff-Indian Creek 10)Saugatuck
August 1989

DATA SOURCE :Allegan County Drain Commission

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�r-

/

N

A

7
MAPS.2 NO-WAKE
■

Saugatuck

No-Wake Area

E'.~m Additional No-wake Area During Periods Of High Water
August 1989

DATA SOURCE: Tri-Community Waterfront Comminee

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�31

&gt;O

32
JI

JI
33
2,

,.

34

37

JO

2•

2,

37

,.

30

,.

2'

,.

23

,.

33

~
.

2•

27

~

31
26

,.

22

•

27

20

--~:...,...~~ ; ,.'.:.:.,
-#~ 2 - , -,·-·: -·

~--Oo

:-::::.-~✓,,,.. 2

·i~~~

~~~~--=

MICHIGAN
Sol• 11 IS.000

IOUNDINOS IN P"Eff
FHT

,oi

....

f

MAP 8.3 SAUGATUCK HARBOR

�MAP8.4 MARINAS

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.

15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21 .
22.
23.
24.

Saugatuck

Ship &amp; Shore Motel/Boatel (0)
East Shore Harbor Club (64)
Pointe Pleasant Yacht Club (14)
Sergeant Marina (63)
Tower Marina (322)
Skippers Cove (12)
Water Side Condo (12)
Naughtins Marina (37)
Saugatuck Yacht Club (16)
Deep Harbor Deve, Inc. (46)
South Side Marina (24)
Casa Loma (11)
Gleasons Marina (9)
Saugatuck Yacht Co. (81)
Walkers Landing (22)
Windjammer Condo Association (12)
Schippas Marina (10)
Singapore Yacht Club (50)
West Shore Marine Inc. (57)
Bridges Of Saugatuck (8)
Coral Gables (50))
v &amp; L Properties (10)
Back Bay Marina (12)
Southside Marina (24)

Total Number Of Permitted Marina Boat Slips
lnArea.........966

August 1989

DATA SOURCE:DNR

Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc, Lansing, Ml

��N

A

MAP 8.5 STREET ENDS/ PARKS

G

Street/Road Ends

0

Saugatuck
Parks

~ Pub_lic Access
1) Oval Beach 2) Mount Baldhead 3) Chain Link Ferry 4) Douglas Beach
August 1Q89

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing , Ml

�N

A
See Preceding Map
For Information
Regarding This Area

MAPS.SA STREET ENDS/PARKS
~ Street/Road Ends

@]

Public Access

August 1989

0

Saugatuck
Parks .
1) Shultz Park 2) River Bluff Park
3) Sundown Park

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

�9-1

Chapter9

GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS

G

rowth and development trends reflect past
settlement patterns in a community and
provide a basis for estimating future development patterns. Growth rates are one aspect of
change. These show which areas are growing at
a faster rate. Residential construction permits
show where most of this residential development
is taking place and provide insight into residential preferences.
Population trends may be used to project
future population, which is used to estimate
future land use needs and settlement patterns
in a community. And finally, a "build out" scenario may be created based upon the vacant or
buildable sites in an area to get an idea what the
area might look like if it were developed according to current zoning and use requirements. A
more complete discussion of these issues is
included below.
GROWfH RATES

The City went from a 19% growth rate in the
60's to only 6% in the 70's. The City's slowing
growth rate is due in part to a shrinking supply
of vacant or developable land and in part to a
higher proportion of seasonal residents and elderly in small households.
In terms of actual numbers, the areawide
population nearly doubled between 1950 and
1980, when it reached a total of 3,780 people.
The Township gained over half of these new
residents. About 28% of the 1980 population
resided in the City of Saugatuck.
TABLE 9.1
RATE OF POPULATION CHANGE
COMMUNTIY

Saugatuck
Saugatuck 1\vp.
Douglas
AREAWIDE

1950-60

200/o
34%
35%
29%

1960-70

100/4
11%
35%
16%

1970-80

6%
400/o
17%
22%

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION

Building permit data reveal development
trends in Saugatuck since 1980. Most of
Saugatuck's growth has taken place along the
lakeshore in the form of multiple family condominiums (see Map 9.1). The City has seen the
development of eight condominium projects
containing 127 individual units since 1980, and
only 10 single family homes in this period. Aside
from new construction, the number of additions.
extensions. and other improvements was high.
MIGRATION

Migration is a strong component of population growth throughout the County. Allegan
County experienced net in-migration of 3 .03%
between 1983 and 1987-the eighteenth highest rate of in-migration in the state. Many of
these immigrants are retirees. Figure 9.1 reveals
migration patterns of senior citizens in the region over the past three decades. It reveals an
explosion of retiree migration into Allegan
County since 1970.
Between 1980 and 1985, the rate ofretiree
migration into the County continued to climb,
reaching 2.17 compared to -0.26 for the state as
a whole.
POPULATION PROJECTIONS

Future population for the City of Saugatuck
was projected based on the 1970 to 1980 population trend, rather than long term trends, due
to recent changes in the rate of population
growth described above. A composite straightline trend can be projected by applying
logarithms to determine the ratio of change
based on the 1970 to 1980 trend. Table 9.2
illustrates these results.
Thus if current trends continue, the area
can expect about 1800 more people in 2010 than
in 1980. Only 15% of this growth is expected to
occur in the City. Sixty-four percent is projected
to take place in the Township, and 21 % in the
Village. Due to its greater availability ofland, the
Village will eventually overtake the City in terms

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�9-2
FIGURE9.l
KENT

TTAWAI -767
54

501
1412

RETIREE MIGRATION TRENDS

•

SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN

0

I

I
I

-1148 .
-713

I

I

+·

·44

- s

. 578
FIGURE9.2

POPULATION TREND
SAUGATUCK TWP.
3.0

p

U

T
H
0

L u

A!
TN

D

2.0

-1WP .ONLY

=
=

SAUGATUCK
DOUGLAS

1.5
1.0

I s

0
N

0.5
0.0
1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

YEAR

of overall population growth, as seen in Figure
9 .2.
PROJECTED LAND USE NEEDS: 2010

To determine the impact of this population
growth on residential land use, future population is translated into new households. This is
done by applying the average household size for
each community to the projected population in
2010 and then subtracting 1980 households.
The result is an estimated 139 new households

-r,

-13
284
1039

J.-

.-- 390

2.5

I

-5
121

VAN BUREN 1'1CALAMAZOO ,•

~

p

·

l

EATON

, -158
- _142

I

1040
· ___
132 ..,!_.
·
804
_____
.J._

~

0

150

AutciAN •l • i.Aiiv
-173
12

Net Migration of The Population 65+
1950-60
1960-70
1970-80

-247
-457

! CAis ·

I 130
ss
1

109

,

-447
-1651 •
1
, -1729

,n.
I
I

,

•

I

CALHOUN

-1196
-1131
-592

!

JWPH.., IR~~c;H
36

-33

580

•

I

-149

-12s

-181

in the City by 2010. These results are shown in
Table 9.3.
Future demand for land by these new
households may be estimated by looking at land
subd.Msion trends and current settlement patterns or zoned densities. Zoned densities are
roughly equivalent to those of the Village. Based
on this information, Saugatuck can expect
about 40%&gt; of its new households to settle in low
density residential areas, 40% in medium density, and 20010 in high density.
This translates into the conversion of 24
acres into low density residential use, 14 acres
in medium density residential, and about 3
acres would be developed at higher densities as
apartments or clustered units. This would leave
a maximum of 94 acres of residentially zoned
land available for development. Tables 9.4 - 9.6
show this projection of current trends.
BUILD OUT SCENARIO
The projections shown above are only estimates based on current trends. Yet any number
of events could alter these trends. For example,
Saugatuck's attraction as a center for tourism
could continue to grow, fostering greater in-migration of retirees and others searching for an
alternative lifestyle. The City could reach an
annexation or other development agreement

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�9-3

with the Township and add to its existing supply
of land. The Township could provide sewer and
water service and attract a higher proportion of
the area's projected households.
But based on current trends and land availability, how much more development could the
City accommodate? This exercise. called a "build
out" scenario, provides an estimate of the buildable capacity of the City under currently zoned
densities. Acres were estimated based on vacant
or developable land by zoned use and density /minimum lot size. These results are shown
for each jurisdiction in Table 9 . 7. Redevelopment potential was considered for under utilized
parcels along the waterfront on Lake Street.
(Township estimates do not include existing
agricultural areas.)
This information can be translated into a
population estimate by first dividing the developable acres by the minimum lot size in that
zoning district to determine the number of
households which could occupy the parcel(s) .
The new households are then multiplied by the
average household size for that community to
derive a population estimate.
The City has an estimated 135 acres zoned
residential available for development. Under
current zoning, this translates into about 330
new households, or 600 new residents. Actual
future land use projections predict that only
about 41 acres of land will be transformed into

residential use by the year 2010. Yet development proposals are already underway which
could bring the City very close to its current
residential build out capacity. No land is available for industrial expansion in the City, and
only about 3 acres could be developed for commercial use.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Without an annexation or other development agreement with the Township (i.e. PA 425
agreement, or consolidation int o a single unit of
government), the City will soon reach its build
out capacity. A policy implication of the shrinking supply of land is the lack of affordable
housing. As the land supply shrinks, the price
of housing increases. This hurts not only young
people who would like to remain in the area, but
also elderly residents on low to moderate fixed
incomes. The cost of housing in the City has
reached a point where many parents can no
longer expect that their children could afford to
buy a home in the City. In the public opinion
survey, City respondents felt that detached single family homes in the $50-70,000 range are
most needed now (52 .6%). The second highest
need expressed was for low income housing
(40.2%).

In terms of strategies to achieve affordable
housing, 43.6% of City respondents favored low-

TABLE9.2
PROJECTED POPULATION
1970-1980 TREND
COMMUNTIY

Saugatuck
Saugatuck Township
Dou.l!las
AREAWIDE

1970
1,022
1,254
813
3,089

1980
1,079
1,753
948
3,780

1990
1,163
2 ,074
1,061
4,298

2000
1,254
2 ,454
1,187
4 ,895

2010
1,352
2,904
1,328
5,584

TABLE 9.3
PROJECTED NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
COMMUNTIY

Saugatuck
Saugatuck Township
Douglas
AREAWIDE

POP.2010
1,352
2 ,904
1,328
5,584

HH SIZE
2.00
2.69
2 .44

#HHs
676
1,080
544
2,300

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

1980 HHs
537
633
391
1,561

NEWHHs
139
447
153
739

�9-4
TABLE 9.5
NEW HOUSEHOLDS BY DENSITY TYPE

TABLE9.4
PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION
BY DENSITY TYPE
COMMUNITY

LOW

Saugatuck Twp. 800/4
400/4
Saugatuck
5%
Douglas

MEDIUM

100/4
40%
70%

HIGH

100/4
20%
25%

HOUSEHOLDS
MED. HIGH TOTAL

LOW

COMMUNITY

Saugatuck
Douglas
Saugatuck 1\vp.
AREAWIDE

56
8
358
421

56
107
45
207

28
38
45
111

139
153
447
739

Totals are based on unrounded figures.

TABLE 9.6
FUTURE RESIDENTIAL LAND NEEDS

COMMUNITY

Saugatuck
Douglas
Saugatuck
AREAWIDE

LOW

24
4
205
234

TABLE 9.7
AVAILABLE ACREAGE BY
LAND USE TYPE

ACREAGE*
MED . HIGH TOTAL

14
26
13

3
4
10
17

53

ACREAGE
COMM.
IND.

COMMUNITY

41
34
228

Saugatuck
Douglas

303

TOTAL ACRES

Sal..l$!,atudc1\vp.

3
33
155
191

0
49
22
71

RES.

135
197
5 ,950
6,282

*times 1.25 (2&lt;:m allowance for rights-of-way)
Totals are based on unrounded figures.

TABLE9.8
POPULATION 2010: BUILD OUT SCENARIO UNDER ZONING IN EFFECT

COMMUNITY

Saugatuck
Douglas
Saugatuckl\vp.
AREAWIDE

ADDITIONAL
HOUSEHOLDS

330
1,139
16,413
17,882

AVERAGE
HHSIZE

2 .00
2 .44
2 .69

ering the minimum square footage requirement
of'housing (now 1040) to make housing more
affordable, while 35% opposed. The current
standard, while slightly higher than that of
Douglas or the Township, is still not excessive.
In terms of density and minimum lot size, 55%
felt that new housing should be at a lower
density than along the Lake Kalamazoo waterfront. revealing dissatisfaction with waterfront
condominium development. Most (65%) felt that
residential density should be the same as that
on "the hill", which is about 5 units per acre.
Another policy implication is that as available land for commercial use is occupied, pressures increase for conversion of residential
areas adjacent to the downtown for commercial
use. Residents and officials wish to preserve the
mixed use character of the Lake Street and

ADDITIONAL
POPUI.ATION

PRESENT
POPUI.ATION

660
2 ,779
44,151
47,590

1,079
948
1,753
3,780

TOTAL
POPUI.ATION

1,739
3,727
45.904
51,370

Water Street districts. while preventing further
conversion of the historic homes to the northeast of Water Street, and protecting the residential integrity of "the hill". In the Public Opinion
Survey, most City respondents agreed, saying
that new commercial development was needed
(59.1 %), but should take place in small shopping centers along Blue Star Highway and at the
freeway interchanges, rather than in downtown
Saugatuck or downtown Douglas.
The high seasonal and weekend population
has also created pressures for the downtown.
Parking appears to be the number one problem.
although 72% of survey respondents felt it is
only a problem during the summer months. City
officials are currently exploring alternative solutions to the problem. Most City respondents felt
that demolishing the old public works building

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�9-5

for parking was the most acceptable solution,
but this building has been sold to private developers.
The greatest problem caused by the lack of
room for industrial expansion is the lack of
corresponding job opportunities. The domination of the commercial/retail sector in
Saugatuck has created a large number of low
paying service jobs, especially in the summer,
but few high paying jobs with the potential for
year round employment. This problem requires
a regional solution. Industrial expansion must
either occur in the Village or Township. One
strategy is to pursue a joint agreement with the
Village and/ or Township to pool resources and
develop an industrial park-a costly endeavor
for either the Village or City to undertake alone.
Land scarcity also has environmental and
aesthetic consequences. If development were to
proceed under the build out scenario, then the
northeast and west side of the City will gradually
develop into low and medium density residential. If not properly managed, this could destroy
the wooded area abutting Kalamazoo Lake and
the dunes. High density development could also
take place along Kalamazoo Lake in the southern portion of the Lake Street mixed-use district.
These projected development trends are
problematic in light of the 1988 Public Opinion
Smvey which revealed that the vast majority of
respondents have the following preferences:
• maintain the scenic, small town/rural
character of the area;
• preserve open space along the waterfront:
• protect the environment by prohibiting development of dunes and wetlands.
• prevent the development of more waterfront condominiums (900,'6 of City respondents).
These results suggest the need to explore
alternatives for preserving the City's wooded
areas, wetlands, and lakefront open space (or
views) while allowing for environmentally-sensitive development in or adjacent to these areas.
They also reveal the need to explore solutions to
the lack of affordable housing for area residents.
The City's land scarcity will make provision of
affordable housing in the City very difficult,
therefore the City's alternatives could include
consideration of a joint agreement with the Village and/ or Township for a mutually beneficial
area housing project. A similar strategy would
expedite development of an industrial park to
attract, and better manage, industrial growth in
the area. Commercial growth to serve the needs
of area residents, will probably take care of itself.

Policies to achieve the public's development
objectives are included in Chapter 1. and the
Future Land Use Plan in Chapter 10. Regulatory
tools, such as wning, subdivision regulations,
and site plan review must be amended to insure
consistency with this plan and the comprehensive plan of each jurisdiction.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�10-1

Chapter 10

FUTURE LAND USE

F

uture land use arrangements are difficult to
predict accurately and guide precisely to
achieve the desired result reflected in the goals,
objectives, and policies in Chapter 1. Yet, they
are critically important to the future quality of
life in the City of Saugatuck. Therefore, something more than goals and policies is needed. A
generalized depiction of future land use arrangements represents one consistent implementation of adopted land use goals. objectives, and
policies. This is typically embodied in a future
land use map and plan.
The future land use map accompanying this
chapter (see Map 10.1) seeks to anticipate community land use needs for 20-30 years. These
future land use arrangements have been formulated based on information in the preceding
chapters. These arrangements are based on
analysis of existing land use, impacts of area
trends. projected future land use needs if current trends continue. and a strong emphasis on
the relationship of land use activities to the
natural resource base. All proposals are intended to be consistent with the goals, obj ectives, and policies presented in Chapter 1 (which
were created with substantial public input).
Many factors could intexvene that would
require either a substantial reevaluation of certain arrangements. or the entire plan. For example, if a large mixed use development (e.g. 1000
single family units plus some commercial) were
built or if a large single employer would enter
the scene (e.g. an auto manufacturing facility)
then land use arrangements in this plan must
be reexamined.
A few key planning and design principles
were used to evaluate alternative land use arrangements. With slightly different trends and
projections. application of the same principles
could lead to different conclusions and different
land use arrangements. However. these differences would be related to the amount of particular land uses more than their location or
relative relationships to adjoining uses. Likewise, there are many areas in which alternative
land use arrangements would be satisfactory
providing they remained in keeping with these
basic planning principles. Consequently, it is
crucial that this plan be regularly reviewed and

updated at least once each five years to insure
its continued relevance in planning for future
land use needs.
PLANNING AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES

Future land use arrangements were determined based on compatibility with surrounding
land uses, natural capacity of the land for particular uses, and necessary infrastructure improvements.
The following planning and design principles are the technical foundation (or rationale)
in support of the proposed land use arrangements graphically depicted on Map 10.1. Map
10.1 depicts generalized land use. which is partially reflected through mapping of zoning districts. The planning principles listed above are
implemented primarily through zoning regulations and applied during the site plan review
process. These principles are consistent with the
goals. objectives, and policies in Chapter 1 and
should remain the basis for reviewing any subsequent changes to the proposed Future Land
Use Map.
These planning principles are:
• Protection of Public Health and Safety
• Consexvation of Natural Resources
• Environmental Protection
• Minimizing Public Service Costs
• Efficiency and Convenience in Meeting
Land Use Needs
• Insuring Compatibility Between Land Uses
(Nuisance Prevention)
Often a land use decision based on one
principle also advances another. For example,
prevention of filling or construction on floodplains protects public health and safety. conserves natural resources, protects the
environment, and minimizes public service
costs (especially for relief efforts). It may also
create a valuable buffer or open space between
uses and hence help insure compatibility.

Protection of Public Health and Sqfety
Key situations in which this principle is
applied include:
• avoiding construction in areas which present natural hazards. In the City these in-

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

~

~

�10-2

elude areas too close to the Lake Michigan
shoreline at high risk from erosion from
coastal wave action: floodplains: saturated
soils and wetlands: soils not well suited for
support of foundations or safe disposal of
septic wastes: and steep slopes.
• avoiding construction in areas with soils
contaminated by hazardous and/ or toxic
waste.
Conservation of Natural Resources

Failure to consciously protect nonrenewable natural resources exposes a community to
unbridled destruction of those resources which
are the foundation for an area's character and
quality of life. Conservation of natural resources
usually focuses on: land, water, minerals, certain soils (such as prime farmland). wetlands,
sand dunes, areas supporting an abundance
and diversity of wildlife, and unique forested
lands. Areas where the land and the water meet
are the most important. Indiscriminate land
subdivision frequently reduces the size or alters
the shape of land, thereby compromising the
resource value and production potential of those
lands. These changes also reflect lost opportunities- usually higher public service costs and
gradual degradation of an area's tourism potential.
Environmental Protection

This principle aims at preventing pollution,
impairment, or destruction of the environment.
While there is considerable overlap with natural
resource conservation issues, environmental
protection measures focus primarily on air and
water quality, and the impact of activities where
the water meets the land. Environmental quality
is best preserved by planning for appropriate
land use activities in and near sensitive environmental areas, and managing development accordingly. This usually means insuring
conformance with all applicable federal, state
and local environmental regulations.
Minimizing Public Service Costs

Public service costs may be minimized by
encouraging new land uses where existing infrastructure is not used to capacity and where
expansion can be most economically supplied.
This also results in compact settlement patterns, prevents sprawl, and is usually favored
by taxpayers because it results in the lowest
public service costs both for construction and
maintenance.

Efficiency and Convenience
in Meeting Land Use Needs

To be efficient in meeting future land use
needs, communities must make better use of
existing infrastructure and plan for infrastructure expansion in a manner which keeps the
costs low and does not create huge areas where
infrastructure will not be fully used for many
years. It also means locating future land uses so
that travel between activity centers is minimized. For example: building schools, neighborhood commercial activities, day care facilities,
fire and police protection, etc. near the residential areas they serve. This saves municipal costs
on initial road construction and future maintenance, reduces everyone's gasoline expenditures, and conserves fossil fuel supplies for
future use.
Insuring Compatibility Between Land Uses
A central objective of land use planning is

to locate future land uses so that they are
compatible with one another. This prevents future nuisance situations between adjacent land
uses, such as loud sounds, ground vibrations,
dust, bright lights, restricted air flow, shadows,
odors, traffic, and similar impacts. A few obvious
examples of incompatible land uses include factories, drive-in establishments, or auto repair
facilities adjacent to single family homes. With
proper planning, land uses can be tiered to
buffer impacts and orderly development can
occur. Examples include: commercial service
establishments on highway frontage with backlot wholesale, storage, or office uses abutting a
residential area: or single family residential uses
adjacent to park and recreation areas.
COMMUNI1Y CHARACTER

When applying the above planning principles to new development proposals, one of the
key considerations is compatibility with the
character of existing development in an area. To
describe the character of Saugatuck, many descriptive words and phrases come to mind,
among them: quiet, friendly, clean, small, aesthetically pleasing, bountiful natural assets,
and good location. Several Public Opinion Surveys in the past three years have revealed the
following four factors as among the most important reasons why people like Saugatuck:
friendly people, attractive/beautiful surroundings, low crime rate and small town atmosphere.
There is a vexy strong identification on the part
of the residents with the character of their City.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�r-

10-3

Saugatuck can be described as being both a
resort residential and year-round residential
community which is primarily dependent upon
the tourist trade it has built throughout this
century. Most residents would like it to remain
like a small village.
DEVELOPMENT

Almost all of the land in private ownership
in Saugatuck is developed. The exceptions are
some large parcels in the northeast and southwest comers of the City. Of these the land
currently used as a church camp adjacent to the
publicly owned Mt. Baldhead area poses the
most potential concern. This area contains
heavily wooded sand dunes which are a major
asset to the region and should not be developed.
The City should initiate steps to insure that
these lands are not subjected to more intensive
development. A consexvation easement is a good
tool to consider using to accomplish this task.
Outright public acquisition, and then leaseback
for camp purposes is another.
The most likely development proposals the
City will face in the next two decades (unless
annexation occurs). will be redevelopment of
existing properties. This is already occurring on
a small scale with individual cottages being
replaced with larger, year round homes. It will
accelerate (if permitted) into replacement of cottages with large densely packed condominiums
along the waterfront as has already occurred on
Lake Street. Without proper land development
regulation, the character of the community
could be significantly changed. Walling off the
waterfront will not advance that goal. With regard to new residential development. affordable
single-family homes and apartments were the
preferred types, with waterfront condos (90%
opposition) and mobile homes (71 % opposition)
receiving the highest response as not being
needed. More industrial development in the area
was supported by nearly 36% of those responding but 22.6% strongly disagreed. Yet 42.2% of
the respondents favored spending tax dollars to
stimulate economic development. The need for
more commercial development in small shopping centers was supported by almost half of the
respondents. City residents prefer this new development along Blue Star Highway, especially
within the Village of Douglas.

TOURISM

A strong tourist oriented character is something that most Saugatuck residents have come
to accept. Yet the increased activity and congestion that go with successful tourism are characteristics which are directly opposed to the
existing small town atmosphere. This is one of
the reasons why solving a very difficult summertime parking problem has been so vexing for the
City.
YEAR ROUND EMPLOYMENT/INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT

Historically, Saugatuck has had very little
industrial development and has been primarily
a community with residential and commercial
development. This situation has reduced the
potential for year round employment and has
made the attraction of new families into
Saugatuck more difficult. The significance of
this trend is that the City could become even
more seasonal and retirement oriented than it
already is. This in tum would further reduce the
capacity of existing commercial businesses to
operate year round and further hinder the delivery of certain services such as education. Some
new industrial development is both needed and
desirable. However, there is no good location for
it in the City, and the existing industrial facilities
do not represent the best use of their present
locations. As a result, the City must a maintain
strong effort in conjunction with Douglas and
Saugatuck Township to attract new industry
into the area, even if it is not located in
Saugatuck.
BLENDING THE RESORT AREAS WITH THE

YEAR ROUND COMMUNI1Y
There will probably always be a division

within the community between resort and seasonal areas and year-round areas. Recognizing
the importance of each and fair representation
of both in community decision making will be
an ongoing challenge in making future land use
and infrastructure decisions. Achieving and
maintaining a balance will be the key to long
term success. The existing commercial and residential areas are quite well separated and the
demarcation lines are fairly clear. It will be
important that they remain essentially where
they are as far as new commercial activity, or
the necessary balance may be lost.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�10-4

The mapping of future land use ts a logical
extension of the goals and policies stated in this
Plan. Land use ts the primary purpose for which
a parcel of land is occupied. This Plan is designed to promote orderly development and ensure that appropriate areas are available for all
classes of land uses anticipated to be needed
within the City during the planning period
(roughly 20 years) based on existing trends. The
future land use plan promotes orderly development in a number of other ways. Home owners
can invest in their properties with protection
from the intrusion and congestion of undesirable uses in the neighborhood. Overcrowding
can be avoided. The City and utility companies
can adequately plan for the services needed in
(re)developing areas and ensure that adequate
land has been reserved within the City for all
necessary uses.
Each of the major classes offuture land use
are described below. Descriptions of planning
areas or neighborhoods are also provided to
supplement the general land uses depicted on
Map 10.1. These specific descriptions correspond to the planning areas depicted on Map
5.3.
FUl'URE LAND USE
Conservation and Recreation Areas
This category embodies environmentally
sensitive or "conservation" areas, as they are
referred to here, and existing parks and recreational resources in the City which were identified on the existing land use map. Conservation
areas include sand dunes, wetlands, floodplains, streams, creeks and drains, the
Kalamazoo River, Lake Kalamazoo, and areas at
high risk of erosion along Lake Michigan. These
areas present severe limitations for development
and are proposed for very limited future development in keeping with their fragility and importance in buffering Lake Michigan storms,
filtering and storing water during periods of
flooding, draining stormwater from land. providing habitat for a wide range of plants and animals, and for their wide ranging open space
values.
Saugatuck's water resources, sand dunes,
and other natural assets make it a desirable
place to live. Destroying these resources would
destroy the essential qualities which continue to
attract residents and tourists to the area. Therefore, future actions and policies to protect the
natural environment will be of utmost importance. These lands should be managed to re-

main as near to their natural state as possible.
Only when other more important public purposes demand ·it, should these lands be altered
or converted to permit another use. The City
wning ordinance should be amended to include
better conservation of these natural resource
areas.
Mount Baldhead: This large critical dune
area with a mixture of open sand and rolling
forested dunes should remain in its present
state without any substantial alteration. Since
most of this area is in public ownership , that ts
feasible. However, the church camp property
could at any time be sold to the private sector
and divided into 2 acre lots and converted to
about 50 single family homes under existing
zoning regulations. State dune regulations may
result in a lower overall density, but residential
development of this area ts not appropriate. The
City should initiate a conservation easement or.
other contractual. deed restriction, or covenant
to insure that this land remains substantially in
its present open space use.
The Mt. Baldhead/Park St. area also contains a large woodlot of upland hardwoods.
These trees stabilize the dunes and are a central
element of Saugatuck's scenic character. As
such, it is essential that they be preserved for
future generations. This can be achieved either
through a conservation easement-where the
land ts acquired by a nonprofit conservancy or
public agency- or through a woodlot or tree
preservation ordinance. A woodlot ordinance ts
recommended as it views the forest as a whole,
rather than tree by tree. The woodlot ordinance
would include regulatory provisions to maximize
preservation of trees while allowing limited residential development (usually through a transfer
of development rights and flexible wning approach .)
Low Density Residential

This area. which encompasses the Park
Street planning area, should continue to be used
predominantly for low density single family
homes. The sand dunes. steepness of the terrain, limited access, heavy woodlands and significant floodplain, argue against any higher
density development. Most of this area is an
identified "critical dune area" which must meet
stringent DNR requirements or. at local option.
local wrung regulations which are approved by
the DNR Any new development should be clustered at a density not greater than one unit per
five acres. Density will vary within this area
however, in recognition of a large number of

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�10-IS

existing developed lots in the Penyman-Park
Street area. However, the new state dune regulations may result in prohibitions against expansions and/ or replacements of existing
structures which may become damaged, due to
the relatively high density of existing development in this area.
Smaller undeveloped lots should be permitted to be used only when combined with existing
adjacent lots (if under the same ownership) or
via a special review procedure to minimize environmental impacts and impacts on adjoining
uses. Existing wning in this area should be
reexamined to consider enlarging the minimum
lot size requirement for undivided areas and to
insure conformance with new state dune regulations.
Single family residential development
should be encouraged in this district, because
it is compatible with existing uses and demand
for scenic , waterfront parcels.
City Center Residential

This dominant residential area in the City
is comprised of that area known as "the hill" and
most of the Holland Street planning area. These
areas have different needs and are addressed in
more detail below.
The Hlll:This area represents the older
more established neighborhood immediately
surrounding the City Center. It is on an escarpment east of downtown that rises suddenly,
providing scenic relief and a natural barrier.
Housing density generally ranges between three
and five units per acre. There are not many
undeveloped lots in this area, except on land
with some soil limitations.
Recommendations for this area are as follows:
• Maintain an average density of three or
four dwelling units per net acre while
maintaining a minimum lot size of 8712
square feet.
• All new housing development should be
required to hook into the City water and
sewer system.
• All new development should be encouraged
to maintain an architectural theme that
complements, rather than detracts from
existing housing in the area.
• No commercial activity should be permitted in this residential neighborhood. Bed
and breakfast activity is probably not appropriate in this area. except along Griffith
street.

Holland Street: The large residential lots
fronting on the River and the marina activity are
presently compatible due primarily to the large
open spaces with mature trees. However, any
pressure which may arise to increase the intensity of waterfront activity in this area or the
intensity of commercial development should
probably be resisted. The marina and associated
activities are separately illustrated on Map 10.1
as "harborfront".
The riverbank rises sharply and provides a
remarkable natural green wall to boats entering
from the channel. It also makes riverfront access
difficult without complex stairways, elevators,
or similar devices which would be difficult to
install without negatively impacting on the character of the area. Many lots are irregularly
shaped with poor access, narrow width, and
would not be suited for more traffic. Nor are they
adequately sized to accommodate additional
parking.
The residential lots on the east side of Holland Street are a more uniform size and shape,
and for the most part, contain well maintained
older homes. New development should only be
residential and should be designed to be compatible with the architectural character of existing homes in the area.
Medium Density Residential

The medium density category represents
the highest density of residential development
in the City. It is found in condominium development along Lake Kalamazoo and in one development overlooking the Lake on the hill. Future
medium density development should be restricted to these same areas. it should not exceed 8 units per acre.
City Center Commercial

This is the original commercial area of the
City. It has gradually been transformed into a
commercial shopping area predominantly oriented to the day tourist. Businesses face a substantial challenge in trying to meet all expenses
and generate a profit in just the summer
months. This is most evident each spring as
several new businesses open shop. Several actions are necessary to encourage the continuation of the kind of commercial mix which is
mutually supportive.
First, the existing historic character of the
City Center should be maintained. The historic
preseivation ordinance is designed to do this,
but some structures have been modified incon-

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�10-6

sistent with the code (and perhaps prior to the
adoption of the code). New regulations may be
necessary to insure new structures are architecturally harmonious. Structures that are relatively new but architecturally inconsistent
should be modified, as the opportunity presents
itself, to improve their harmony with the character of the district.
Second, the key to long term success of this
area is to maintain the proper balance of tourist,
versus general business activity.
Third, the public open space in this area
needs to be retained and maintained. It is central to the small town character of the City.
Fourth, in conjunction with the Water
Street area. a better solution to parking problems must be found for the summer months.
Professional assistance should be sought. Options should not include the establishment of a
multi-level parking structure in the downtown
or near the waterfront.
Fifth. the City and the business community
need to promote a harmonious working relationship that is based on commitment to a long
range course of action. A progressive alliance
should be encouraged (see Chapter 12).
Downtown Saugatuck will continue to serve
as the major center for commercial tourist activities in the region. But expansion of commercial
uses outside of the downtown area presently
zoned for commercial use should be discouraged, and appropriate measures should be
adopted to mitigate impacts of the city center on
adjoining residential areas.

Institutional
This category comprises existing institutional uses, including churches, public utilities,
government offices, and schools. Public facilities
(i.e. schools, utilities, and offices) have the capacity to meet public service needs for the planning period of this plan.

Water Street
This waterfront planning area identified in
Chapter 5 is not shown as a single entity on the
future land use map because of the clear distinctions in use that occur there- distinctions
which are incorporated into other future land
use designations. such as city center commercial, conservation/recreation, and harborfront.
Water Street runs along Saugatuck's central
eastern shore and presents an interesting mix
of public and private open space, residential,
commercial, and marine oriented activities.

Yet, the area also deserves some attention
as a general planning area because of certain
trends which could alter its character. The existing trend towards conversion of single family
homes in the area to commercial or bed and
breakfast use is appropriate, provided the architectural character of the area remains in harmony. Every opportunity to prevent the
establishment of new "modem" designs and
eliminate existing ones should be seized. Likewise, wherever possible. the original elegance of
buildings in this area should be restored.
Public access should be preserved where
possible. The existing boardwalk is a special
asset which should remain open to public access, and as the opportunity presents itself.
could be expanded further throughout this area
and into the Lake Street area. Change in the use
of existing street ends should be carefully scrutinized, and public access insured in any event.

Mixed Residential
This designation describes the future of
much of the Lake Street planning area (to the
south) and the Center Transition planning area
(which adjoins the downtown commercial area).
It is characterized by a mixture of residential
and commercial uses.
Lake Street: This area has a high potential
for negative future change. The market for waterfront condominiums remains fairly strong
along the West Michigan shoreline. It is often
profitable to purchase waterfront property. remove an existing residence and redevelop as
condominiums. Several such conversions have
already occurred (at the western end of Lake
Street and between Griffith and Butler) to the
detriment of public values. In particular, public
access to and viewing of the waterfront has been
lost, and a canyon has been created by the high
structures now lining this part of the shoreline.
To prevent further loss of Saugatuck's character, this area must receive more specific zoning
treatment than under existing wning regulations-which treat it as a predominantly commercial area. rather than a predominantly
residential area.
A strong effort should be made to concentrate any new large structures which may be
proposed only on the north side of Lake Street.
tucked close to the ridgeline so they do not block
the view of residents on the hill. If they are put
on the south side, they should have large
amounts of open space on either side to insure
a public view of the Lake.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�10-7

If more intensive development is desired
and can be adequatelymanaged, the City should
consider establishing a bulkhead line from Griffith to Blue Star and thereby increase the dockage area. This should be done only if a common
walkway were established that is open to public
access for the entire length and if such action
would not result in overcrowding of Lake
Kalamazoo at the time it were implemented.
Such a proposal should include a means to deal
with increased traffic, parking and boat launching. If this idea were implemented, it may not be
desirable to maintain the historic district designation in this area, as many existing structures
would likely be removed consideration could be
given to identifying this area as Mharborfront"
and permitting a mix of marina, commercial,
and residential uses.
The area east of Blue Star Highway should
not be intensively developed due to the extensive
wetlands in this floodplain.
Center Transition Area: This area north of
the City Center presents a real challenge to local
land use regulations. There is some pressure to
convert these large residential structures into
commercial use, but the market isn't sufficient
to justify this and it would dramatically alter the
area's overall residential character. Therefore,
existing municipal policy allowing limited commercial activity as accessory to the primary
residential use of the properties on North Butler
should continue to be carefully administered.
Conversion of entire structures to commercial
use should not be permitted.
Additional bed and breakfast establishments in this area would be appropriate. The
northeast portion of this area has characteristics more in keeping with the residential area on
Mthe hill" and should be maintained in concert
with the recommendations described for that
area.
Harbor.front

The marina area along Holland Street is the
only area categorized as harborfront at the adoption of this plan because of its special orientation to the water. However, further changes
along Water and Lake Streets as previously
described could also warrant classification of
these areas as Mharborfront".
Industrial

This category applies to the small industrial
area in the City, which is currently occupied by
Rich Products. Although commercial rather

than industrial use is the best use of these
properties in the long term, Rich Products is a
strong, local company and a major employer,
and without a public effort to relocate it in
comparable facilities elsewhere, this plan encourages its continuance.
The City encourages expansion and continued improvement of the industrial area under
development in Douglas- especially an industrial park which could provide jobs and bolster
the economy of the entire tri-community area.
Industrial parks are an excellent way to manage
future industrial growth. Although they have
broad, long-term public benefits (including
lower service costs, fewer nuisance impacts,
better design, and less environmental impact).
industrial parks require a large short-term investment in land and public services. Therefore,
it is crucial that studies be conducted to insure
that the park could be competitive with others
in the area.
The Michigan Department of Commerce
maintains an inventory of industrial parks
through the Statewide Site Network. Only certified industrial parks will be included on this list,
and thereby be able to effectively compete for
new industries. To be certified, industrial parks
must be at least 40 acres, a site plan for the park
must be approved, soil borings must be conducted, infrastructure must be completed, utilities must be installed 300 feet into the park,
and protective covenants must be established.
The City supports future efforts to create an
industrial park within the trt-community area,
provided it targeted nonpolluting, light industrial and office activities that were compatible
with the tri-community area.

Planned Unit Development (PUD)
The PUD designation is recommended for
most of the Maple Street planning area. This is
the only major area of the City on the east side
of the River which is not fully developed. Extensive soil limitations, wetlands, some floodplains,
and forested acreage characterize this area. The
area's two wells provide the primary source of
groundwater for the City (and presently for
Douglas as well). The area contains some multifamily development and is well suited for more
multifamily development, provided it is carefully
sited, or single family development on large lots.
The natural characteristics of the land
make it especially well suited for planned unit
development. Good site design could cluster
units, while keeping the overall density equal to
or less than the adjoining City Center residential

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�10-8

area. The City should consider requiring that all
subdivisions and multi-family development projects be designed as a PUD in this area, provided
that existing PUD provisions in the zoning ordinance are revised to remove some problematic
provisions. PUD can allow flexibility in site design and housing density, thereby increasing
open space, preserving natural features of the
site. and enhancing the quality of the development project-to the benefit of both developers
and the community. This concept can also encourage innovative design and efficiency in providing public services.
Design flexibility under PUD is typically
accomplished through density transfers, according to a predetermined regulatory scheme,
and comprehensive site plan requirements and
design standards. In this way, buildings may be
clustered through mixtures of housing types
such as detached houses. townhouses, and
apartments. This mixture of housing types creates fine housing opportunities for various
groups without negatively affecting adjoining
land uses.
ENTRY POINTS

~

There are three major entry points into the
City of Saugatuck. (See Map 10.2). They are:
• from Lake Michigan on the Kalamazoo
River
• from Blue Star Highway at the Kalamazoo
River Bridge
• from Blue Star Highway onto Washington
Road/Holland Street
At the present time, the entries from Lake
Michigan and over the Kalamazoo River provide
an aesthetic and inviting entry into the City. The
public opinion surveys reflected citizen concern
about the appearance of properties along Blue
Star Highway. The old entry sign/intersection at
Holland Street/Washington and Blue Star Highway is especially bad. The situation is further
harmed by signs along 1-196 which fail to inform
southbound travelers at exit # 36 that they can
access Saugatuck (only Ganges is mentioned).
First impressions are very important in the
tourism industry. Attractive entryways help entice tourists into the community and leave a
positive impression to encourage future visits.
The entry points represent the community and
should reflect those qualities which make the
area special. Fortunately. these design problems
are easily overcome, and with only minimum
public investment. A special joint effort to develop alternatives for improving the entry points

into all three communities should be initiated.
In addition, new land developments in these
areas (or changes to existing ones) need to be
carefully reviewed to insure that changes enhance (and do not further detract from) the
positive image and character that should exist
in these areas.
CITY-WIDE RECOMMENDATIONS

Residential

Residential use will continue to be the predominant developed land use 1n the City. The
challenge in the next twenty years will be maintaining the older housing stock and ensuring
that the growing ranks of part-time residents
and absentee owners do not result in housing
deterioration. Equally important will be efforts
to blend new development with the older character of existing land uses.
Within Saugatuck, there will be pressure to
remove existing homes along the waterfront and
replace them with higher density condominiums. Condominium development that greatly
diminishes the public view of the waterfront
should not be permitted, especially along Lake
Street. Additionally. the height of new construction should not exceed 25-30 feet along the
waterfront. It would be better to place taller,
higher density development back "into the hill"
and leave the shoreline open.
Another residential issue relates to affordable housing. The City. like many communities
in Michigan, is faced with an affordable housing
crisis. lf the Saugatuck School District is to
survive with the same breadth of programming
and quality it has today. then affordable housing
must be available for families. In terms of new
construction, affordable housing typically
means homes of about 1, 000-1,200 square feet.
on smaller than average lots. and priced at not
more than $70,000. Some public incentives or
write-downs are typically necessary to achieve
this. The only housing of this type being built in
the area is on large lots in rural parts of the
Township.
More apartments and temporary housing
for summer workers could be provided in selected areas throughout the City. But unlike
Douglas and some areas of Saugatuck Township, the City has little acreage well suited for
the higher density development typically associated with affordable housing. For this reason,
the City supports the construction of affordable
housing within Douglas or Saugatuck Township, and may cooperate on such a venture

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�10-9

where feasible and where mutual benefits are
clear.

Other Recommendations
The following recommendations are important to maintaining the character of the City and
improving its present function and hence
should be implemented as a part of the future
land use plan.
• The maintenance and replanting program
recently prepared for the aging trees
throughout the City should be consistently
implemented.
• Sidewalk repairs, replacement, and installation are badly needed in some blocks.
• Curb, gutter and street repair /repaving
should be performed on a scheduled periodic basis consistent with an adopted capital improvements plan. New curbs at intersections with sidewalks should all be
sloped to accommodate handicapper and
bicycle access.
• A network of bicycle paths should be encouraged. This network should complete a
regional network and inner city streets
which connect the routes should be
marked, but no additional right-of-way is
necessary at these junctures.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�----------------~-

....

ar.

MAP 10.1 FUTURE LAND _USE

g

Low Density Residental

~ City Center Residential

~

Saugatuck

Floodplains/Wetlands

/1111 fl Institutional

~ Medium Density Residential ■

Mixed Residential
,_,

,.

City Center Commercial
~

smf \Conservation/Recreation

-✓

m'rn Harborfront

mm
r~ ~ ~T:l Industrial
[E:E::
•••••

I

Planned Unit Development

'W'Wlil'W

::::
·:g:

N
0

----

600

Scale 1" = 600ft

August1989

Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc, Lansing, Ml

1200

1800ft

.

,·
. _,

�N

A
,.._.__
O

600

1200

Scale 1" = 1212 ft

MAP 10.2 ENTRY POINTS

Saugatuck

I•I Entry Points

August 1989

DATA SOURCE: City Of Saugatuck 0-dnances

Planning &amp; Zoning Center Inc, Lansing, Ml

-

�11-1

Chapter 11

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION

B

y itself this plan has no legal regulatory
force but rather, serves as a foundation
upon which regulatory measures are based. The
two primary land use regulatory documents
which are also the principal means of implementation of this plan, are the zoning ordinance and
subdivision control regulations. These regulatory instruments are described in the next chapter.
However, effective integration of this Plan
will also require · an ongoing commitment to
intergovernmental cooperation with Douglas
and Saugatuck Township. In particular, the
Joint Plan prepared concurrently with this one
should be implemented as steadfastly and also
kept current with comprehensive reviews at
least once each five years.
It will also be very important to make every
effort to keep Douglas and Saugatuck Township
officials informed of proposed changes to this
Plan or any of its regulatory instruments (such
as zoning) and to encourage their input prior to
such a change being made. Likewise, those jurisdictions should be encouraged to reciprocate
with proposals and an opportunity for review by
the City of Saugatuck prior to action on any
change which may impact on the City. A copy of
this Plan and any amendments to it will be filed
with the clerk of each of these jurisdictions, as
well as with the County Clerk, the County Planning Commission, the County Economic Growth
Alliance, the West Michigan Regional Planning
Commission, and Department of Natural Resources.
Ongoing efforts to consolidate additional
public services such as police and possibly public works should be continued where mutually
beneficial. Kalamazoo Lake Sewer &amp; Water Authority has functioned well and should continue
to strengthen its efforts.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

- ~

--- -- - - - - - - -

�12-1

Chapter 12

STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION
PRJMARY IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

Relationship to Zoning
The City of Saugatuck has a zoning ordinance adopted pursuant to the City-Village Zoning Act, PA 207 of 1921. The intent of that
ordinance is to regulate the use of land to provide for orderly growth and development and
allow the integration of land uses without creating nuisances. The zoning ordinance defines
land use districts and regulates height, bulk,
use, area oflot to be covered, and open space to
be preserved within each district.
Because the Zoning Enabling Act requires
the zoning ordinance be based upon a Plan and
this Plan, prepared by the Planning Commission, has been prepared to guide future land use
decisions, the zoning ordinance should be revised to reflect this Plan's new goals, policies,
and future land use proposals. However, the
zoning district map and the future land use map
(10.1) will not be identical. The zoning map
typically reflects existing land use (where it is
desirable to continue it) and small areas zoned
for more intensive use then at present. The
future land use map (on the other hand) reflects
land use arrangements at some future time. (See
Section 10.10, p. 245-250, Michigan Zoning &amp;
P_lanning, 3rd Ed .. by Clan Crawford, ICLE, Ann
Arbor, 1988) .
The City should continue to maintain a
formal site plan review process. Through this
process applicants, in order to obtain zoning
approval, must submit plans which clearly indicate how their development proposals will
change and affect both the parcel of land being
developed as well as surrounding properties. It
is recommended that all commercial and industrial development, as well as all subdivisions,
multiple family housing, planned unit developments. and other development requiring more
than five (5) parking spaces, undergo site plan
review.
In addition. the zoning ordinance and fee
structures should be amended to permit the City
to require developers of new commercial and
industrial uses and all proposed multi-family
developments to pay into an escrow fund to be
used for payment of professional review fees by

engineers. planners and attorneys (if necessary) . Unused escrowed dollars would be returned.

Relationship To Plans/ZoniJllg
In Adjacent Jurisdictions
The land use proposals in this plan were
carefully prepared with an eye to ensuring compatibility with those of Douglas and Saugatuck
Township. Equal care should be taken in the
future to seek and receive comment on proposals that are on or near a border from an adJoiningJurisdiction. Failure to do so will only insure
future conflict over adjacent land uses. or the
provision of new public services.
Relationship to Subdivision Regulations
The City of Saugatuck should adopt subdivision regulations if the remaining undeveloped
land is to be platted as opposed to developed
under PUD provisions. The enabling legislation
that permits the enactment of such regulations
is Public Act 288 of 1967. also known as the
Subdivision Control Act of 1967. This Act allows
a community to set requirements and design
standards for streets. blocks. lots. curbs, sidewalks. open spaces, easements. public utilities.
and other associated subdivision improvements. With the implementation of a subdivision ordinance there is added assurance that
development will occur in an orderly manner.
The City of Saugatuck should consider amending its subdivision and zoning regulations to
prohibit the establishment of lots which would
be unbuildable under existing state or local
regulations (such as lots which are wholly
within a protected wetland).
Relationship to Capital Improvements
In its basic form, a CIP is a complete list of
all proposed public improvements planned for a
6 year period (the time span may vary). including
costs. sources of funding , location, and priority.
The CIP outlines the projects that will replace or
improve existing facilities. or that will be necessary to serve current and projected land use
development within a community.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�■

12-2

Advanced planning for public works
through the use of a CIP assures more effective
and economical capital expenditures, as well as
the provision of public works in a timely manner. The use of capital improvements programming can be an effective tool for implementing
the comprehensive plan by giving priority to
those projects which have been identified in the
Plan as being most important to the future
development and well being of the community.
The City Planning Commission should develop
a formal capital improvement program.
Land Use &amp; Irifrastructure Policies
A strong effort will be necessary to coordi-

nate future capital improvement decisions and
land use policies with adjoining units of government. As a result, proposed policy changes
should be circulated for comment early. Likewise, proposed capital improvement programs
should be prepared with adequate time for review and comment by the adjoining jurisdictions.
Community Participation And Education

In order to gain the support, acceptance,
and input of area residents for future planning,
ongoing efforts should be continued to provide
information to them, and involve them in the
planning process. The importance of their role
in that process should be emphasized. Public
acceptance will make the implementation of
plans much easier and public input makes
plans better and more responsive to local needs.
SPECIAL AREA &amp; FINANCING TECHNIQUES
Building and Property
Maintenance Codes

BOCA (Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc.) is the basic building
code adopted by the City to regulate construction methods and materials. The adoption and
enforcement of a building code is important in
maintaining safe, high quality housing and in
minimizing deteriorating housing conditions
which contribute to blight within neighborhoods. This should be continued.
The City should consider adopting a basic
property maintenance code to regulate blighting
influences which result from failure to properly
maintain property and structures. A standard
code such as the BOCA Basic Housing- Property
Maintenance Code or a locally developed code
could be adopted.

Community Development
Block Grant Program
The Community Development Block Grant
program was authorized under Title I of the
Housing and Community Development Act of
1974. The Act had the effect of combining several federal categorical grants such as Urban
Renewal and Model Cities into one. Grants
under the program must principally benefit low
and moderate income families.
In Michigan there are two categories of eligible applicants: entitlement and non-entitlement. Entitlement communities, by meeting
specific eligibility criteria, are given grant funds
outright without having to compete for them.
Non-entitlement applicants must compete for
grant funds by applying through the Michigan
Small Cities Community Development Block
Grant Program. The City of Saugatuck is not an
entitlement community. Therefore, it must
apply through the Small Cities Program.
Operation of the Michigan CDBG Program
is the responsibility of the Michigan Department
of Commerce with central program administration by the Department's Office of Federal Grant
Management (OFGM) . The Department of Commerce has entered into an agreement with the
Michigan State Housing Development Authority
(MSHDA) assigning administrative responsibilities for the housing component of the program.
In the housing area, samples of grant eligible activities include:
• Home Improvement Programs
• Rental Rehabilitation Programs
• Weatherization and Energy Conservation
• Home Repair for the Elderly
• Public Improvement in conjunction with
targeted housing activity (limited to 25 percent of grant request)
• Housing Related Services
• Housing for the Homeless.
The maximum grant amount is $250,000.
By applying and obtaining a Small Cities Block
Grant. the City alone, or in concert with Douglas
and Saugatuck Township could establish a
housing rehabilitation program which would
help preserve housing throughout the area.
The CDBG program also has the following
categories of assistance:
• Base Industrial Loan program helps f. m cially viable businesses needing fina ial
assistance for growth, modernizatio or
expansion. Limit $750,000).
• Commercial Retail Loan program is for
commercial, services, tourism, and other

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�12-3

non-residential projects: and minority
owned and retail projects in distressed
communities. Limit $400,000.
• Public Infrastructure Assistance program
funds public improvements for the location
and expansion of public infrastructures.
Limit $750,000.
• Downtown Development program provides
financing to assist businesses in the redevelopment of the downtown area. Limit
$500,000 or $300,000 for infrastructure
improvement.
• Communities in Transition program funds
community development activities, such
as public sewer and water systems, parks,
bridges. roads, and comprehensive redevelopment planning. Limit $400,000.
• Emergency Community Assistance program funds communities experiencing an
imminent and urgent threat to public
health, safety, or welfare which occurred
within 90 days of application . Limit :
$500,000.
Downtown Development Authority - Act
197ofl97lS

This Act permits a city, village, or township
to establish a nonprofit development corporation called a Downtown Development Authority
(DDA) with broad powers, including those of
taxation and bonding, to focus on revitalization
and development within established "downtown" boundaries.
The Act gives an authority broad powers
with regard to the planning and development of
the downtown district. It may engage in downtown planning, promote housing and public
facility developments, and economic development projects. Operating revenues may be
raised through public and private contributions
or through properties the DDA may control.
With the approval of the municipal governing
body, an ad valorem tax may be levied on real
and tangible personal property within the downtown district. Capital financing may be raised in
a number of ways:
• A ODA may issue revenue bonds. These,
with municipality approval, may be secured by "the fuU faith and credit" of the
municipality.
• A DDA can request the municipality to
borrow money and issue notes in anticipation of collected taxes.
• A DOA, with municipality approval, may
create a "tax increment fmancing plan" in

which it devotes projected increases in future tax revenues from increased assessed
valuation in the project area - "captured
assessed value" - for repayment of debts
incurred in making selected public improvements. Revenue bonds are issued in
anticipation of future revenue.
Michigan State Housing Development
Authority (MSHDA) Programs

To help preserve Michigan's older existing
housing, Public Act 130 was passed in 1977 to
allow MSHDA to begin a home improvement
loan program that offers reduced interest rates
to eligible low and moderate income families.
MSHDA has created the Home Improvement,
Neighborhood Improvement and Community
Home Improvement Programs (HIP/NIP/CHIP).
To get a loan, residents should apply to one of
the banks, savings and loans, or credit unions
that take part in HIP /NIP/ CHIP.
Land and Water Conservation Fund

The Land and Water Conservation Fund
(LWCF) grant program was authorized by Public
Law 88-578, effective January 1, 1965. The
purpose of the program is to provide federal
funds for acquisition and development of facilities for outdoor recreation. The LWCF Program
is administered jointly by the National Park
Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
All political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, are eligible to participate in the program. Eligible projects include:
1. Acquisition of land for outdoor recreation, including additions to existing parks,
forest lands, or wildlife areas.
2. Development including, but not limited
to such facilities as: picnic areas, beaches,
boating access, fishing and hunting facilities, winter sports areas, playgrounds,
ballfields. tennis courts. and trails.
For development grants. the applicant must
have title to the site in question. The minimum
grant allowable is $10,000 and the maximum
grant allowable is $250,000.
For all grant proposals, the amount of the
grant cannot exceed more than 50 percent of the
total project cost.
Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund

The Kammer Recreational Land Trust Fund
Act of 1976 (Public Act 204) was passed by the
Michigan Legislature and signed by the Gover-

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�■

12-4

nor on July 23 1976. This Act created the Michigan Land Trust Fund. The program provided
funds for public acquisition of recreational lands
through the sale of oil, gas. and mineral leases
and royalties from oil, gas. and mineral extractions on state lands.
On November 6, 1984, Michigan residents
cast their vote in favor of Proposal B. This constitutional amendment created the Michigan
Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRfF), Public
Act 101 of 1985, which ofikially replaced the
Michigan Land Trust Fund on October 1. 1985.
MNRrF assists state and local governments (including school districts) in acquiring land or
rights to land for recreational uses, protecting
land because of its environmental importance or
scenic beauty, and developing public recreational facilities.
Any individual, group, organization, or unit
of government may submit a land acquisition
proposal, but only units of government may take
title to and manage the land. Only units of
government may submit development proposals. All proposals for local grants must include
a local match of at least 25 percent of the total
project cost. There is no minimum or maximum
for acquisition projects; for development projects, the minimum funding request is $15,000,
the maximum is $375,000.
Costal zone Management Fund
The Land &amp; Water Management Division of

the Department of Natural Resources offers
grants for the purpose of planning, designing,
and carrying out low-cost projects to improve
Great Lakes shorelines and connecting waterways. The City recently received approval of a
$50,000 CZM grant to improve its parking facilities at Oval Beach.
The Recreation Bond Fund

The Recreation Bond Fund draws from
bonds approved by voters in 1988. It calls for
money to be spent on DNR and local recreation
facilities in four categories:
Recreation infrastructure: such as
ballfields, tennis courts, beaches and other
shoreline areas, boat launches, trails, picnic
areas, historic structures, playgrounds, roads,
parking, restrooms, etc., which are not less than
15 years old;
Waterfront recreation: such as fishing
piers, boardwalks, boat launches, marinas, amphitheaters, landscaping, and shoreline stabilization:

TABLE 12.1

RECREATION FACILITIES &amp;: THEIR MINIMUM NUMBER OR SIZE NECESSARY TO
ACHIEVE MINIMUM POINTS
RECREATION FACILI1Y

MINIMUM SIZE

Bicycle Trail
Playground

3 pcs. of play

Swimming Beach
Boat Launch
Campground
Non-motorized Trail
Cross-country Ski
Hiking
Nature
Horse
Fishing Access
Fishing Piers
Nature Area

1 mile

equipment
50 feet
5 parking spaces
1O campsites
1/2 mile

50 feet
1

10 acres

NOTE: Points are not to be awarded separately for
cross-country ski trails, nature trails, and hik1ng
trails. These trails are to be considered as one facility.
Source: DNR, Mlchll!an's 1987-88 Recreation Al:·
tioo Program Guidel&gt;ook.

Community recreation: playgrounds,
sportsfields, community centers, senior centers,
fishing sites, and trails for the handicapped;
Tourism-enhancing recreation: including
campgrounds, boating facilities, historical sites,
recreational conversion of abandoned rights-ofway, and fishing access.
In its statewide inventory of recreational
facilities, the DNR has identified Allegan County
as deficient in a number of recreational facilities.
Those relevant for the tri-community area include deficiencies in bicycle trails, fishing access, fishing piers, boat launches,
campgrounds, nature areas, hiking trails, nature trails, cross country ski trails, picnic areas,
and playgrounds. Allegan County communities
with proposals for such projects will get funding
priority over similar projects proposed in nondeficient counties. Table 12.1 includes the minimum number or size of selected recreation
facilities to be considered toward bond funding.
Grant requests may not exceed $750,000
and may not be less than $15,000. Applicants
must match bond funds with 25% of the total
project cost, not including other state grants or
legislative appropriations. Bond money will only
be allocated to projects on sites controlled by

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�12-3

public agencies. In the tourism category, priorities are given to projects which: create new and
innovative recreation-related tourism attractions: involve partnerships between the public
and private sector: and projects for which feasibility studies have been conducted which demonstrate local, regional. and statewide economic
benefits.
The City has received preliminary approval
of a $62,500 recreation bond fund grant for
improving the beachhouse facilities at Oval
Beach.
Recreation Improvement Fund

The Recreation Improvement Fund was created from State fuel tax revenue. About
$750,000 per year is being targeted for development of non-motorized trails (hiking. bicycle,
cross-country. and nature trails). No application
forms or criteria have yet been prepared, but the
Recreation Division is encouraging local governments to submit proposals based on local determination of need, location. and financing.

Local Facility Development Grants
These grants come from a number of funding sources and are available for planning, design, or development of local recreational
facilities. The Village of Douglas received
$11,000through this program in FY 1987-88 for
improvement of its boat launch site on
Kalamazoo Lake.
Land Acquisition Grants
Land acquisition grants are available for
projects aimed at open space presexvation: park
creation or expansion: acquisition of environmental resources such as sand dunes, woodlots,
or wetland areas: waterfront access sites: and
many other land acquisition projects intended
for (passive or active) recreational purposes.
Waterways Fund

The Waterways Division of the Department
of Natural Resources offers grants for the purpose of developing public boating facilities. The
emphasis is on creating boat access sites and
supporting facilities.

provement Act (Act 233 of 1987). and the Local
Road Improvements and Operation Revenue Act
(Act 237 of 1987, as amended). The acts will be
in effect for five years. when they will be reviewed
for continuation by the legislature.
The Local Road Improvements and Operation Revenue Act authorizes county road commissions to impose a vehicle registration fee and
use these funds for road improvements. This Act
has had little utility. however. because the fee
must be approved by a public vote. Michigan
voters in 3 counties rejected proposed fees in the
November 1988 election. Many counties chose
not to even put it on the ballot. fearing the same
result.
The Road Construction and Improvement
Act (Act 233) provides funding through the
transportation economic development fund only
to rural counties (less than 400,000 population)
with a national lakeshore, national park. or in
which 34% or more of the land is commercial
forest land. Then a portion of the remaining
funds are available for use for county. city, and
village street improvements.
The Transportation Economic Development
Fund allocates money for the purposes of bringing county roads to all season highway standards. This is important because heavy trucks
can only travel regularly on all season roads.
The Transportation Economic Development
Act also offers counties. cities, and villages the
opportunity to compete for additional funding
on special projects with economic development
objectives. This competitive grant is awarded by
the State Highway Commission. Qualified project categories are listed below:
(a) Economic development road projects in
any of the following targeted industries:
agriculture or food processing: tourism: forestry: high technology research: manufacturing: office centers solely occupied by the
owner or not less than 50,000 square feet
occupying more than 3 acres of land.
(b) Projects that result in the addition of
county roads or city or village streets to the
state trunk line system.

Road Funds

(c) Projects for reducing congestion on
county primary and city major streets
within urban counties.

In 1987. three acts were passed to provide
a new source of revenue for cities, villages.and
county road commissions. The Transportation
Economic Development Fund (Act 231 of 1987,
as amended). the Road Construction and Im-

(d) Projects for development within rural
counties on county rural primary roads or
major streets within incorporated villages
and cities with a population of less than
5,000.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�■

12-6
PUBLIC WORKS FINANCING

In addition to using general fund monies. it
is often necessary for a community to bond to
raise sufficient funds for implementing substantial public improvements. Bonding offers a
method of financing for improvements such as
water and sewer lines, street construction, sidewalks. and public parking facilities. Common
municipal bond types include:
1. General Obligation Bonds - full faith and
credit pledges, the principal amount borrowed plus interest must be repaid from
general tax revenues.
2. Revenue Bonds - require that the principal amount borrowed plus interest be repaid through revenues produced from the
public works project the bonds were used
to finance (often a water or sewer system).
3. Special Assessment Bonds - require that
the principal amount borrowed plus interest be repaid through special assessments
on the property owners in a special assessment district for whatever public purpose
the property owners have agreed (by petition or voting) to be assessed.
TAX INCENTIVES

The state law permitting communities to
provide property tax incentives for industrial
development is Act 198. This Act allows a community to provide tax abatements as an incentive for industrial firms which want to renovate
existing or build new facilities.
ADDfflONAL RECOMMENDATIONS
Other Planning &amp; Economic

Development Assistance
The City Planning Commission should
maintain regular communication with the
County Planning Commission, with the West
Michigan Regional Planning Commission, and
with the Allegan County Community Growth
Alliance. These organizations should be encouraged to continue their County and region-wide
planning and economic development efforts and
to share relevant materials with the City. Likewise a copy of this Plan should be forwarded to
each of these agencies when adopted.
Pro-Business Alliance
One way to strengthen Saugatuck's economic development potential is to establish a

pro-business exchange in City government (or
jointly with Douglas and Saugatuck Township)
modelled after the Michigan Bell Business Retention and Expansion Program. (Saugatuck is
not eligible for participation in the Michigan Bell
Business Retention and Expansion program because it is not in a Michigan Bell service area.)
A pro-business exchange creates an atmosphere
of cooperation which benefits both the business
and the community.
The role of a pro-business exchange is to
assist existing businesses in finding solutions
for their problems (i.e. inadequate parking, expansion or relocation needs, etc.) and help make
new businesses feel welcome. The exchange
would work with area businesses to determine
their needs and appoint an ombudsman to inform new businesses of local services and contacts. Businesses are often not aware of the
services available to them or who to contact for
more information. A brochure could be prepared
which identifies who to contact for information
on zoning, construction, planning, utilities, and
taxation. The brochure could also identify permit fees, tax and utility rates, and transportation, delivery. freight, health, and financial
services available in the area.

Poverty
The changing economy, higher health care
costs, higher literacy and skills requirements for
employees, and inflation have seriously hurt the
nation's poor, including the elderly on fixed
incomes. Social security benefits are the only
retirement income for about two-thirds of all
American retirees. and an estimated one million
Michigan residents have no private or public
health insurance.
The poor are often overlooked in community
development efforts, yet they are the group most
in need of public assistance. Over eight percent
of the City's residents were living below the
poverty level in 1980. That's an annual income
of less than $3,778 for those under 65, and
$3,479 for those 65 and over.
The City should continue to monitor the
number of people in poverty through the census
counts and work with local churches and nonprofit groups to assist them through food drives.
temporary shelters, or other needed services.
Collection of Trqffi.c Count Data
A more detailed analysis of street and road
needs should be undertaken. However, doing so
is limited by the lack of any systematic and

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

f"

�12-7

recent traffic count information. The tri-community jurisdictions would greatly benefit from
Jointly purchasing the necessary equipment and
undertaking specific traffic counts on a regular
basis. The cost and training associated with this
is minimal compared to the benefit.

Downtown Saugatuck
Downtown Saugatuck has a parking problem during the summer months. Low cost solutions have been difficult to find . However,
discretionary tourist visits are likely being lost
on peak days due to limited parking. Expert
analysis is needed. Solutions should not include
the establishment of above ground parking
structures that significantly alter the character
of the area.
Public Open Space Acquisition
Programs to acquire public open space
along the water should be initiated. One option
is to create a local nonprofit land conservancy.
There are several very effective ones operating in
Michigan. Priority should be given to building a
trust fund for acquisition and maintenance or
tying into existing ones by the Nature Conservancy and similar organizations.
Periodic Updating and Revisions
As these additional studies are undertaken
the Plan should be updated to reflect the new
information. At a minimum the plan should be
comprehensively reviewed and updated at least
once every five years.
Managing Growth and Change
The key to successfully managing future
growth and community change is integrating
planning into day-to-day decision making and
establishing a continuing planning process. The
only way to get out of a reactionary mode (or
crisis decision making) is by planning and insuring the tools available to meet a broad range
of issues are current and at hand. For that
reason it will be especially important that the
recommendations of this Plan be implemented
as the opportunity presents itself (or revised as
circumstances dictate) .
Many new tools may be made available to
local governments over the next few years to
manage the growth and change process. It will
be a challenge to City officials to pick from
among the new tools, those that will provide
greater choice over local destiny and quality of
life.

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�APPENDIX A
References

�■

REFERENCES
Listed below are some of the key reports, studies, plans, and data sources which were used as
references in the preparation of this plan. Other data sources are referenced throughout the plan.
DEMOGRAPHICS
U.S. Census, Current Population Reports, East North Central 1986 Population and 1985 Per
Capita Income Estimates for Counties and Incorporated Places. Series P-26, No. 86-ENC-SC (also

referencedfor economic data).
U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1980- Summary Tape File 3A (microfiche) for
Saugatuck, Saugatuck Township, the Village of Douglas, and Allegan County.
HISTORY

Joe Armstrong and John Pahl. River &amp; Lake: A Sesquicentennial History OF Allegan County,
Michigan. published by the 1835 Committee. 1985.
MASTER PLANS

Saugatuck Township General Development Plan, prepared for Saugatuck Township by
Williams &amp; Works. Inc .. 1975.
Village of Douglas Land Use Plan. prepared by the Village of Douglas Planning Commission
with the assistance of the West Michigan Regional Planning Commission, adopted November 19.
1986.
Land Use-Village of Saugatuck, prepared by the Saugatuck Planning Commission with the
assistance of the West Michigan Regional Planning Commission, 1979.
NAnJRAL RESOURCES

Michigan Resource Inventory System Database, Department of Natural Resources.
Soil Survey of Allegan County, Michigan, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil
Conservation Service, March 1987.
OWNERSHIP

Land Atlas and Plat Book, Allegan County, Michigan, Rockford Map Publishers. Inc .. 19871989.
Saugatuck Township Plat Boolr., Township Treasurer's Office, Saugatuck, Township.
RECREATION

A Parks and Recreation Plan for Allegan County, Michigan, prepared for Allegan County by
Williams &amp; Works, Inc .. 1986.
Saugatuck-Douglas Area Parks and Recreation Plan. prepared by the tri-community area
Parks and Recreation Commission, with the assistance of the Saugatuck Public School District.
February 1985.

~

�~

SOLID WA-,TE

Allegan County Solid Waste Plan, prepared for the Allegan County Board of Commissioners
and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources by the Allegan County Planning Commission,
PA 641 solid Waste Planning Committee, and the West Michigan Regional Planning Commission,
September 1983.
ECONOMY

Real and Personal Property SEV, 1980-88, Michigan Department of Treasury, State Tax
Commission.
The Economic Impact of Travel on Michigan Counties , prepared for the Michigan Travel
Bureau by the U.S . Travel Data Center, July 1988.
Travel and Tourism in Michigan: A Statistical Profile, First Edition, Research Monograph # 1,
Michigan State University, Travel, Tourtsm and Recreation Resource Center, 1986.
Michigan Employment Securtty Commission, Bureau of Research &amp; Statistics, Detroit, Michigan.
UTILITIES

A Feasibillty Study on the Utillzation of a Single Ground Storage Reservoir, SaugatuckDouglas Water System, prepared for Kalamazoo Lake Sewer &amp; Water Authority by Holland
Engineertng, Inc., January 18, 1983.
Facillties Plan for Wastewater, prepared by Williams &amp; Works, April 1976.

~

Saugatuck Township Area Utlllty Service Study, prepared by Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr &amp;
Huber, Inc .. March 1988.
Village of Douglas Water Supply Contamination Problem Evaluation and Recommendations, Wolverine Engineers &amp; Surveyors, Inc., July 1, 1987.
Village of Saugatuck Streets and Public Utilltles Condition Report, May 1984.
Waterworks Reliabillty Study for Kalamazoo Lake Sewer and Water Authority, prepared by
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr, &amp; Huber, Inc., March 1987.
ZONING

City of Saugatuck Zoning Ordinance , as amended through October 1989.
Saugatuck Township Zoning Ordinance, as amended through October 1989.
Village of Douglas Zoning Ordinance, as amended through October 1989.

�APPENDIX

B

Demographic, Economic, and Housing Data

•

�■

I"'

A. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
1. Age Cohorts (Raw Data)

Douglas

Saugatuck

Area

Saug. Twp.

County

--------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------23
11
17
19
6
36
59
14
15
23
18
14
16
22
18
60
84
72
106
82
48
17
30
85
49
4

13
15
21
3
11
30
47
6

under 1
1-2
3-4
5
6
7-9
10-13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22-24
25-29
30-34
35-44
45-54
55-59
60-61
62-64
65-74
75-84
85+

17

18
15
19
13
24
14
50
106
92
101
136
59
21
27
138
57
26

61
52
94
46
46
86
212
67
55
73
67
37
80
80
53
188
297
330
349
483
215
46
132
333
210
47

25
26
56
24
29
20
106
47
23
32
34
4
51
34
21
78
107
166
142
265
108
8
75
110
104
17

1496
2560
2544
1289
1332
4274
5989
1522
1642
1758
1666
1392
1403
1402
1230
4267
6706
6503
9306
7820
3927
1172
1882
5151
2555
767

Source: U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1980--Summary Tape File 3A, item 15.
Detroit, MI, tel. 313-354-4654.
2. Age Cohorts (Aggregated and Percent Comparisons)
Age
0-4
5-14
15-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+

Saugatuck
49
97
170
198
101
136
107
221

(4.5)
(9.0)
(15.8)
(18.4)
(9.4)
(12.6)
(9.9)
(20.5)

Douglas
51
134
186
156
106
82
95
138

(5.4)
(14.1)
(19.6)
(16.5)
(11.2)
(8.6)
(10.0)
(14.6)

Saug. Twp.
107
226
277
273
142
265
191
231

(6.3)
(13 .2 )
(16.2)
(15.9)
(8.3)
(15 .5)
(11.2)
(13.5)

Area
207
457
633
627
349
483
393
590

(5.5)
(12.2)
(16.9)
(16.8)
(9.3)
(12.9)
(10.5)
(15.8)

County
6,600 (8.1)
14,406 (17.7)
14,760 (18.1)
13,209 (16.2)
9,306 (11.4)
7,820 (9.6)
6,981 (8.6)
8,473 (10.4)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Source: (same as above , 1960 and 1980).

0

�•

3. Change in Age Cohorts from 1960-1980
Age

1960 M/F

1960

-

Tri-Community Area
1980 M/F

1980

Change 1960-80

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0-4
5-14
15-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+

121/140
274/249
133/146
129/139
170/166
142/147
115/163
196/232

261
523
279
268
336
289
278
428

(9.8)
(19.6)
(10.5)
(10.1)
(12.6)
(10.9)
(10.4)
(16.1)

113/94
233/224
325/308
337/290
170/179
239/244
192/201
231/359

207
457
633
627
349
483
393
590

(5.5)
(12.2)
(16.9)
(16.8)
(9 .3)
(12.9)
(10.5)
(15.8)

-20.7%
-12.6%
126.9%
134.0%
3.9%
67.1%
41.4%
37.9%

Source: (same as above, 1960 and 1980).
4. Place of Birth

Michigan
Another State
Born Abroad
Foreign Born

Saugatuck

Douglas

Saug. Twp.*

Area

615 (56.9)
422 (39.1)
5 (0.4)
37 (3.4)

577 (60.9)
320 (33.8)
2
(0.2)
49 (4.4)

990 (57.8)
598 (34.9)

2182 (58.3)
1340 (35.8)
7 (0.2)
210 (5.6)

124

(7.2)

County
63,771 (78.2)
15,934 (19.5)
227 (0.3)
1,623 (2.0)

* Some individuals not accounted for.
Source: (same as above), item 33.
5. Place of Residence - 1975 (Persons 5 years old and over)
Saugatuck
Same House
Same County
Another County
Another State
Abroad

503
187
228
117

(48.6)
(18.0)
(22.0)
(11.3)

423
156
198
103
8

Douglas

Saug. Twp.

(47.9)
(17.6)
(22.4)
(11.6)
(0.9)

984 (59.5)
144 (8.7)
244 (14. 7)
280 (16.9)

Area
1910
487
670
500

(53.4)
(13.6)
( 18. 7)
(14.0)
8 (0.2)

County
44,575 (59.3)
15,428 (20.5)
10,923 (14.5)
3,962 (5.2)
241 (0.3)

Source: (same as above), item 34.
6. Household Characteristics

Total HHs
Ave. HH size
2 parent fam.
Female HH head

Saugatuck

Douglas

Saug. Twp.

537
2.00
219
41

391

2.44
222
31

633
2.69
411
28

Source: (same as above), items 10 and 20

Area

County
1561
2 .39
852
100

27,282
2.95
19,520
1,911

�■

7. Marital Status
Saug Twp

Douglas

262 (28.1%) 325 (23.9%)
467 (50.1%) 849 (62.5%)
25 (2 . 7%) 28 (2.1%)
107 (11.5%) 75 (5 . 5%)
72 (7 . 7%) 82 (6.0%)

177 (23.2%)
449 (58.8%)
16 (2.1%)
66 (8.7%)
55 (7.2%)

Saugatuck
Single
Married
Separated
Widowed
Divorced

Source: (same as above) , item 26 .

B. HOUSING STOCK
1. Structure Type

Saugatuck

Douglas

Area

Saug Twp.

County

--------------------- - ------------------------------- - -----------------------------Total units
Year Round Units
1 in Structure
2 in Structure
3 and 4 in Struct
5 or more
Mobile Homes
Vacant , Seasonal,
&amp; Migratory
1 in Structure
2 in Structure
3-4 in Structure
5 or more
Mobile Home/Trailer

772
569
385
49
68
60
7

529
406
290
20
16
40
40

850
734
636
32

203
150
6
18
29

123
108
11
4

116
106
5

66

5

2,151
1,709
1,311
101
84
100
113

31,864
28 , 985
23,190
1,001
583
1,199
3,012

442
364
22
22
29
5

2 , 879
2 , 250
51
57
153
368

~

Source: U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1980--Summary Tape File 3A, item 102/ 103 .
Detroit, MI, tel. 313-354-4654
2. Year Structure Built - Year Round Units
Saugatuck

Douglas

Saug Twp.

Area

County

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1975-80
1970-74
1960-69
1950 - 59
1940-49
Pre 1940

36
19
51

(6 . 3)
(3.3)
(9.0)
73 (12. 8)
56 (9.8)
334 ( 58. 7)

22 (5.5)
46 (11.3)
81 (19.9)
32 (7. 9)
36 (8.9)
189 (46.5)

Source: (same a s above), item 109.

72

116
133
99
68
246

(9.8)
(15 . 8)
(18.1)
(13.5)
(9.3)
(33.5)

130
181
265
204
160
769

(7.6)
(10.6)
(15.5)
(11.9)
(9.4)
(45.0)

3568 (12.3)
4326 (14.9)
4458 (15 . 4)
3647 (12.6)
2507 (8.6)
10479 (36.2)

�3. Occupancy
Saugatuck
Total Units
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

772
334 (43.2)
205 (26.5)

Douglas
529
271 (51,2)
117 (22.1)

Area

County

850
2,151
531 (62.4) 1,136 (52.8)
117 (13.7)
439 (20.4)

31,864
22,271 (69.8)
4 , 961 (15.5)

Saug Twp .

Source: (same as above), item 97.
C. ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
1. Type of Employment
Saugatuck
Private Wage/Salary 402 (73. 5)
Federal Gov.
7 (1. 3)
State Gov.
21 (3.8)
Local Gov.
49 (9.0)
Self Employed
68 (12.4)
Unpaid Family Worke

Douglas

Saug Twp.

Area

County

333 (76.9)
1 (0.2)
25 (5.8)
33 (7. 6)
40 (9.2)
1 (0.2)

492 (71.4)
11 (1. 6)
2 (0.3)
56 (8 . 1)
92 (13.4)
17 (2.5)

1227 (73. 5)
19 (1.1)
67 (4.0)
138 (12.0)
200 (12.0)
18 (1.0)

26697 (78.5)
308 (0.9)
775 (2.3)
3022 (8.9)
2977 (8. 7)
246 (0. 7)

Twp/Douglas

Area

County

County(%)

43,730,725
9,402,800
1,126,200
2,661,790
430,733

64,898,211
20,080,005
1,905,350
2,661,790
430,733

604,509,215
101,799,772
50,272,956
153,232,546
3,251,687

Source: (same as above), item 67.
2. Real Property SEV - 1988
Saugatuck
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Agricultural
Developmental

21,167,486
10,677,205
779,150
N/C
N/C

66.2
11.1
5.5
16.8
0.4

Source: Michigan Department of Treasury, State Tax Commission, 1988.
Lansing, MI, tel. 517-373-1091.
3. Total Annual Real Property SEV - 1980-88
Year

Saugatuck

Douglas

1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987

13 , 709 , 600
15 , 682,000
18 , 314,033
20,855,000
25,831,436
27 , 382,650
29,737,980
32,727,560

10,560,200
11,723,580
13,341,647
15,101,800
16,848,894
18 , 756,700
20,321,283
21,957,626

Saug Twp.* Saug. Twp.**
18,482,350
21,042,164
23,287,428
25,691,300
27,155,345
28,922,650
30,023,509
32,464,745

42,752,150
48,447,744
54,943,108
61,648,100
69,835,675
47,679,350
50,344,792
54,422,371

Area
42 , 752,150
48,447,744
54,943,108
61,648,100
69,835,675
75,062,000
80,082,772
87,149,931

* not including Villages.
** including Saugatuck and Douglas through 1984 and Douglas only after 1984.
Source: Michigan Department of Treasury, State Tax Commission, 1988.
Lansing, MI, tel. 517-373-1091

�■

4. Annual Average Employment

-Tri-Community Area

Year

Ave. Emp.

1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989

1,491
1,527
1,555
1,613
1,695
1,656
1,175
2,461
2,550
2,700

Source: Michigan Employment Security Commission, Field Analysis Unit.
Detroit, Michigan, tel. 313-876-5427.
5. Persons in Poverty by Age
Saugatuck
Less than 55
55-59
60-64
65+

67
3

Douglas

Saug Twp.

Area

County

77
6

83

227

24

39

5181
281
206
1127

9
8

8

15

78

Source: U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1980--Surnmary Tape File 3A, item 93.
Detroit, MI , tel. 313-354-4654 .

�•

APPENDIX

C

Public Opinion Survey Responses

�■

CITY OF SAUGATUCK
PUBLIC OPINION SURVEV
RESULTS
PAUL HARRIS: AIIIITAHT RBSBARCH DIRJ!CTOR

RESPONSE RATE
WE SENT 726 SURVEVS FROM OAKLAND UNIVERSITY USING
THE MA IL LABELS FROM THE CITV. WE RECEIVED (es of
11 /29/88) 372 SURVEVS FROM THIS MAILING, PRODUCING
A RESPONSE RATE OF 51.2 PERCENT. IN ADDITION, WE
RECEIVED 11 RENTER SURVEYS WHICH WERE DISTRIBUTED
BV THE TOWNSHIP. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SURVEVS USED IN
THE FORTHCOMING ANALYSES IS: 383.

�COt1t1UNITY VALUES

Q.:.!:

•

lmportcnce of things people look for inc community.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2= NOT IMPORT ANT, 4 &amp; 5: IMP ORT ANT, 3: HAS BEEN OMITTED

small town ctmosphere
quiet town
friendly people
ettract1Ye/beutiful surroundings
good plcce to raise children
{rcditioncl values
religious opportunities
freei:iom to be myself
chance to get involved in loccl org·s
low crime rate
good school system
Tow tax rates
close to lcrger cities
convenient shopping opportuni tes
cvcilability of good housing
f ami 1y in tne 8re8
job in area
water based recreation ne8rby
not industrielized
Q.2:

NOT 1r~iRTANT
16.81
3.31
2.71
3 t .61
34.91
36.21
13.21
35.31
4.41
t 4. t I
6.91
20.41
27 .41
19.01
56.61
40.81
t 4.61
23.71

IMP~~NT
70.31
94.31
94.01
57.81
49.01
46.21
75.91
37.91
91.01
64.01
78.31
54.71
49.41
53.91
25.51
43.91
66.41
46.91

How has the community changed.

better place to live
stoyed obout the some
worse ploce to live

CHECKED

32.81

43.21
24.01

9~

As the area grows and chonges, which best describes Sougetuck.
1= smell villoge, 2= beclroom community, 3= Hollond suburb, 4= Smon city

community as is
community as would like it to be
community as think it will be

g.:-4;,

1

67.51

65.31
19.71

~

11.71
19.11

-rlt
2.71

21.81

How would you rate the communites on the following.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2= POOR, 4 &amp; 5= GOOD, 3: HAS BEEN OMITTED

business climate
churches
community events
entertainment
geneftJl appearance
flousmg
1ob
location
medical care
recreation
resteurant~

~
8.41
28.41
41.71
10.91
34.11
63.81
4.61
45.41
12.21
24.51

ft
68.21

47.51
36.81
71.91
25.21
9.31
93.01
27.71
67.61
58.81

4

24.01

20.31
39.41

�■

114

ft
10.51

cont
roeas
schools
senior citizen services
shopping
social services
taxes

26.01
43.01
47.41
65.71

mi

62.61
38.81
39.01
15.41
18.21

COt1t1UN ITY PROBLENS

Q&amp;

Problems faced by the communities, how importent ore they to you.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp;. 2= NOT A PROBLEM, 4 &amp;. 5: PROBLEM, 3: HAS BEEN OMITTED
NOT
violent crime
property crime
vondelism
teens w/ nothyi ng to do
drugs
alcohol
unemployment
new job opportunities
housmg shortages
public recreation
too much development
not enough development
lack of health care...
trafic safety
perking deowntown Seug.
skateboards/bikes downtown Seug.
run down property
litter downtown area
litter elong blue ster Hwy.
appearance of bus. along Blue
congestion at ovel beech
quefity ovel beach facilities
access to weterbodies
local schools
city gov·t services
counfy gov·t services
leadership elected officiels
lnedequete taxes
inodequete locol phmning
inadequate local development
erosion&amp;. flodding
contamination dnlcing water
water quelity
wet lends
send dunes
other env. destruction
ined. senior progrems
erosion along lel&lt;eshore Dr.
ined. weter supply
ined. sewer service
snowmob111 ng on pub 11 c roeds

A PROBLEM
88.01
73.61
73.31
31.BI
29.21
28.81
50.81
19.91
33.51
66.51
50.61
63.11
35.21
65.01
32.01
56.11
60.21
66.51
61.11
54.71
66.61
57.41
60.51
65.11
44.51
28.61
35.41
60.61
33.11
37.91
47.61
21.61
22.41
43.01
40.41
37.51
46.91
14.41
35.21
47.11
57 .61

PROBLEM
5.31
13.91
12.81
49.61
44.31
49.11
21.71
52.51
38.11
22.91
36.81
22.61
55.21
18.71
65.81
22.01
27.61
18.51
21.51
32.51
12.21
25.71
24.31
4.41
40.51
27.01
42.51
12.41
53.41
45.01
39.41
46.51
57.01
35.71
38.41
18.21
23.61
74.11
40.51
21.31
16.01

�SHOPPING &amp; SERVICES
Where do you go most often for the following thi~gs.
1= So~otuck, 2= Hollond, 3= close to work, 4= better serv1ce,
5: mo choice, 6= lower cost
·

J;l.8:

-

opplionces
outo/truck soles
outo /truck services
bokery goods
benking
beoutician/borber
books
car wosh
clothing
doy core
dept. store
dry cleoners
fom11y restouronts
fancy restaurants
fost food
flower shop
furniture
~roceries
ordwore
loundromat
1own &amp;. gorden sup.
lumber
med1col services
movies
phormocy
sporting goods

11~

1
29.71
0.01
16.01
78.11
77.41
73.71
37.11
51.11
14.01
85.91
0.61
42.51
64.71
38.61
2.01
74.71
15.31

56.21

71.41
86.71
38.11

64.91
36.51
0.01

77.11

8.31

~
68.01
56.31
14.11
11.31
10.41
31.31
41.51
42.91
9.81
56.11
49.21
30.21
39.81
79.31
15.71

3
7. 11
9.11
8.11

6.31

8.61

9.31
7.71

5.61
12.51
2.21
12.81

4.81

1.21
5.01
5.31

4.41

34.31
37.91
24.61

10.61

47.31
20.91
43.81
90.31
15.81
66.41

4.31
4.11
10.81
3.31
3.31

10.71

2.71
2.61

2.71

7.31

4

2.41
3.61

3.01
0.01

0.01
5.41
3.81

0.01
3.01
2.21
1.81

0.01
0.01
2.81

0.01

0.01
0.61
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
3.41
3.81
0.01
0.61
0.71

-for
13.91
11.11
0.91
1.81

0.61

17.61
0.01
24.71
0.01
27.31
1.01

3.01

12.91
13.31

4.41
29.61
0.91
0.91
0.01
4.91
5.11
5.21
6.41
1.51

11.11

Approve or disopprove of future commerciol development.

NOTE: OR IGI NAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp;. 2= DISAPPROVE, 4 &amp;. 5: APPROVE, 3= HAS BEEN OMI ITED
in smell shopping centers
1n one 1orge shopping center
in downtown Soug.
in downtown Douglas
in scottered commerciol oreos
in str1 p commerci o1 oreos
nowhere

Jt.11.;.

o1s~E.~fYE
48.91
53.91

51.01

45.91
67.61
59.11

a1~0VE

7.51

24.51
37.81
37.31
30.61

17.91

10.81

Where should new commercial development occur.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp;. 2= DISAPPROVE, 4 &amp;. 5: APPROVE, 3: HAS BEEN OMI ITED

-

along
olong
olong
olong
olong
olong

North Blue Star Hwy.
South Blue Ster Hwy.
Butler St. in Sougotuck
Weter St. in Sougotuck
Loke St. in Sou~otuck
M-89 outside o Fennville
ot freewoy interchenges

Dl~APPfVE

25.4

17.91
56.31
50.81

58.BI
31.61

16.21

A~~VE
9. I
69.81
24.91
29.51
22.71
37.11
60.61

6

~

5.41

5.41

0.61
0.91
0.61
2.61
1.91
3.01
0.01
1.51

2.61

0.91
0.91
0.01
0.71

5.61
2.41

0.61
0.01

5.51

1.71

0.01
0.01

1.81

6.21

�•
!I~

DOWNTOWN
Whet ere your priorities for $eugetuck's downtown.
'

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2= LOW PRIORITY, 4 &amp; 5: HIGH PRIORITY, 3: HAS BEEN OMI ITED

LOW G~.WIIIY

edditionel pub11c restrooms
benches for pedestriens
control truck traffic
dress up store fronts
flowers &amp; lendscepe
historic preservetion
resident oriented businesses
more perking
tourist oriented businesses
new lighting
offices
reduce cer treffic
restaurants
shopping
weterfront retail businesses
writerf ront who 1es61 e business
waterfront boat services
writerfront perk

g~

51.21
36.01
48.81
34.71
22.51
27.11
25.41
51.31
45.61
60.51
49.01
53. 1I
47.11
59.11
83.61
45.6:C
35.61

36.61
48.01
40.81
55.11
64.61
43.31
70.51
26.11
38.4:C
18.71
31.3:C
35. 11
38.51
26.01
6. 11
40.91
52.71

Do you feel there is e perking problem other then between
Memoriel Dey end Labor Dey 1n downtown Seugetuck.
yes= 24.81

.Q~

HIGHr.~ORITY

no= 72.21

uncerte1n= 2.41

Which of the following options do you prefer for providing
edditionel perking downtown.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2: DISAGREE, 4 &amp; 5: AGREE, 3: HAS BEEN OMI ITED

AGREE.
-so.cl

DISAGREE
demolish old public works build.
aquire edd. public property
leeve problem for downtown bus.
cre8te pertnershi p...

g~

32.61

47.5:C
61.5:C
32.61

38.41
25.61
38.81

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPt1ENT
Does the riree need more i ndustri el deve1opment.
( 1= strongly disrigree to 5: strongly egree)
1= 22.61,

2: 11.21,

3: 9.91,

4: 16.41,

5: 35.91

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPt1ENT
Q.17:
Whet type of residentiel development is needed in Seug8tuck.
{1= needed now, 2= needed later, 3= not needed, 4= don't know)
1
epertments
37. 11
1o.ar
atteched single...
29.51
18.71
38.51
13.31
det8ched single ... (50-70)
52.61
11.71
29.51
6.11
detached single ... (70+)
33.71
17.71
36.21
12.41
W8terfront condos
4.BI
2.51
90.41
2.21
1ow income housing
40.21
4.51
48. 91
6.41
mobile homes
4.91
B.61
71.41
15.11
seniors housing
30.11
14.11
38.11
17.71

~

~

�Would you favor lowering the min. square footcge to mcke housing
more affordable.
( 1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree)

•

1= 29.8:C,

g_ 19:

2: 13.8:C,

5: 28.71

New housing should be built et e density that ts ...
( 1=higher then, 2= lower then, 3= seme es, 4= uncertain)
1

21.41

sfu
23.6:C

22.81
16.7:C
42.7:C

32.91
9.71
22.21
5.S:C

4.81

Saug. waterfront of Lk.Kel.
on the hi 11 in Saugatuck
in downtown Saugatuck
in downtown Douglas
the shore of Lk. M"I
agr. areas Saug. twp.

J].20:

4: 6.21,

3: 21.41,

5.81

~
SO.SI
53.11
39.11
45.71
14.7:C

4

~

4.S:C
8.21
28.41
15.41
37.2:C

RECREATION
Type of additional recreational facilities are needed in the
Saugatuck area.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2: LOW PRIORITY, 4 &amp; 5: HIGH PRIORITY, 3: HAS BEEN OHi ITED
6: TOO FEW TO LIST
basketball courts
bike peths
boet 1eunchi ng ramps
camping
community center
cross country ski trails
fitness center
golf course
fl1k1ng trails
horseback tra11 s
ice rink
Lk. front open space(Lk. HI)
Lk. front open spece(Lk.Kal)
public Hennes
private merines
movie theater
neighborhood playgrounds
perks
picnic arees
raquetbell courts
riverfront open spece(Kel river)
senior citizen center
shuffle boerd
softbell ff elds
swimming pool(s)
tennis courts

.Q.21:

LOW PRliRITV

51.3

16.7:C
33. 11
45.4:C
42.01
25.01
35.41
59.91
27.0:C
51.51
46.41
25.61
31.81
39.41
60.3:C
43. 91
60.01
46. 11
49.7:C
72.41
28.8:C
30.0:C
58. 91
62.21
46.91
53.0:C

14.BI

66.0:C
45.01
32.11
33.61
61.5:C
33.91
18.11
62.41
18.21
37.7:C
60.71
49.71
36.91
10.61
37. 71
20.41
41. 11
31.31
5.21
48.6:C
24.51
17 .01
16.61
36.71
23.71

WATERFRONT DEVELOPNENT &amp; SURFACE WATER QUALITY
Which of the following best desribe your use (s) of nearby water
bodies.
(VALUES REPRESENT PERCENT CHECKED)

~
sw1mm1ng

~I

sunbathing
fishing(boat)

12.01

------- --

HIGH PRIORITY

6.81

6.81

a½i:c

'68.71
56.91
33.71

21.k1
4.71
4.21
6.81

�■

~~ cont.
is ing{shore)
nature study
sailing
windsurfing
waterskiing
powerboat t ng
scuba dtvtn~
waterfowl unt.
ice ftshing
ice skating
cross country ski.
snowmobi 1i ng
iceboating
other
I dont use it

}5\

1f.51
· 28.21
11.71
3.41
10.21
24.61
1.01
7.61
4.21
0.51
10.21
2.61
1.31

~5
24.BI
17.21
6.61
12.51
• 31.11
0.51
1.01
5.21
4.41
9.11
1.61
2.91

34.7:C
35.21
16.6,S
21.71
39.71
8.41
1.31
0.81
1.01
12.51
2.91
0.81

6.01

5.01

3.11

I

~I
10.41
3.41
3.71
B.91
14.61
0.51
4.21
6.81
2.11
5.51
2.11
1.61

.

{I\

22.71

.(l.22: Which term best describes your opinion of the present water quality
of the following water bod1es.
KR

f!i

very good
po?cl
a1r
poor
ver_-w poor
don t know

&amp;1
5.01
20.41
26.51
33.11
9.61

6.71
15.21
32.11
31.21
11.51

11A1
32.01
30.21
9.21
4.01
7.11

~I
6.91
21.71
17.61
8.51
40.91

9.23: Bcsed on your experience in recent years the water quality of the
following water bodies has.

Hffz

improved great 1¥i
improved slight y
16.81
30.61
stayed the same
deteriorated slightly 17.61
detert otated great 1y 12.41
don't know
12.41
.(1.24:

,.

rl"..
1~1
13.61
32.21
18.91
12.31
12.01

10~
19.91
35.81
20.81
5.91
7.01

7~
9.51
25.01
5.91
2.61
49.01

Indication of feeling about the adequacy of the followtng faciltttes
on each water body.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp;. 2: INADEQUATE, 4 &amp;. 5: ADEQUATE, 3: HAS BEEN OMITTED

DESCRle:!1011

u.
a~~~ ~~~

boat launch
boat sltps(r)
21.1
boat slips{c)
9.2
marinas
18.9
swim.beaches 26.2
boat ser-11ce
18.7
pumpout f aci 1. 24.5
fish cleaning
29.2
camp grouds
39.0
parks
26.9
public rest.
32.7
other pub. acc. 37.0
des boat mom 44.9
des no wake
27.2

41.9
56.9
55.9
36.9
42.0
35.3
33.0
26.3
45.0
39.6
20.0
26.8
49.0

ft
20.2
9.1
19.6
28.6
14.7
16.4
28.7
41.5
26.3
30.1
35.6
44.4
25.7

45.6
64.3
60.3
32.8
46.9

37.6
33.1
27.7
48.7
42.3
17.9
25.9
47.8

U1

M
1i~~
23.5 17.5
20.6
20.7
14.9
19.4
19.4
20.3
51.7
26.7
45.8
33.3
36.4
13.1

20.6
24.7
77.3
27.6
18.8
19.2
17.2
52.0
28.9
25.7
21.4
42.3

A
19.6
13.7
16.6
11.4
9.7
12.5
17.2
39.3
32.3
22.8
27.0
28.2
17.6

24.9
27.5
22.5
20.4
21.B
16.0
17.6
17.7
17.7
19.9
18.9
19.9
37.8

~

""

�Should the City c,ctively cooperote in the construction of on
areawide marina. ( 1= strongly diseJgree to 5= strongly eJgree)
1= 33.61,

2: 13.81,

3: 11.91,

4: 8.91,

5: 31.71

OTHER LAND USE QUESTIONS

Do you think summertime festiY81s ere good for the 58ugetuck eree.
yes= 76.81,

no= 11.11,

uncertain= 11.61

!1.27: Which, if eny, of the following types of ·home occupations· do you
favor being permitted in resi denl 1811 y zoned erees.
NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2= OPPOSE, 4 &amp; 5: FAVOR, 3: HAS BEEN OMITTED

bed &amp; breakfast
h8irdressers/berbers
music 1essons
d8ncelessons
accounting/ta)( prep.
lew offices
medical offtces
edult foster cere
dey care
·evon·, ·emway"
typing services
dressmeiki ng/ a1t.
ceramics
clothing boutiques
bakery
ptzzana
smell engine repair
antique seles

.Q...21t

OPPOSE

FAVOR

44.81
6.71
11.31
13.01
34.31
44.61
36.81
26.61
34.11
13.01
9.31
39.81
60.81
66.91
70.91
59.01
48.21

40.21
84.41
76.71
72.11
43.91
42.61
42.51
49.41
49.51
71.21
78.31
37.01
22.01
19.51
16.31
20.11
37.81

28.41

67.31

Whet 8re your priorities for Blue Ster Ht ghwey.

NOTE: ORIGINAL PRESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2: LOW, 4&amp; 5: HIGH, 3: HAS BEEN OMITTED

better lighting
uniform sign controls
improve traffic flow
add e center tum 1ane
instell public sewer
install public weter
improve dretnege
1mprove eppeerance
creete commerci81 strip
more tourist orientated bus.
more shopping
more industry
more personel sendces
more auto services
more offices
fest food rests
drive thru businesses
no changes

A
31.31

32.51
23.21
27.11
30.31
31.81
23.01
43.41
58.51
34.51
29.31
38.01
42.51
35.31
40.11
40.01
61.11

HIGH
sf]i

52.31
48.01
50.81
41.21
38.71
35.01
66.81
37.31
28.31
41.11
49.81
47.91
35.41
38.01
50.01
40.41
19.21

�■

eef&amp;
cont.
e er 1ane str1 ping

re surfacing
uniform speed limit
bike bath
more trees

~

6~.~~

13.01
34.61
22.41
33.71

65.31
56.61
69.91
48.41

~

ENVIRONHENTAL PROTECTION
g~ What 11mitat1ons, if any, should be imposed on development in
eech of the following areas.
( 1= no new deve 1opment, 2= very 1ow density, 3= moderate density)
(4= No special regulation)

1
eTo)
forested sand dunes
open sand dunes
84.41
wetlands &amp; swamps ad'1oining 73.11
wet 1ands &amp; swamps in and
70.61
along the Kal. river
39.01
along Kal. lake
39.01
along Lk. Ml
34.81
along Silver Lie.
35.31

!).30:

r&amp;
-rlr
10.41
1.61

16.21
12.71
32.81
31 .91
43.61
28.21

6.41
13.31
19.51
21.51
16.81
24.51

""

4

1.91
2.51
4.21
3.41
8.81
7.61
4.81
12.11

PUBLIC SERVICES
How would you rate the following local pub11c services.

NOTE ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2= POOR, 4 &amp; 5: GOOD, 3: HAS BEEN OMITTED
ambulance
animal control
building inspections
fire protection
first responder unit
tnturban bus
1and use p1tmni ng
librar~
other tty Hall services
parking in downtown
park mainteinace
playground equip.
pol1ce protection
property assessment
pub1i c boet 1eunches
schools K-6
schools 7-12
schools- community ed.
sewer serv1 ce
snow remove 1
storm drainage
street lighting
street mai nta1 nonce
street resurfacing
water service
waterfront maintenance
zoning enforcement

~

42.01
37.01
6.81
6.71
6.51
65.61
17.91
37.41
64.91
25.91
29.81
17.21
49.91
45.51
6.81
9.11
10.51
20.81
8.71
25.61
32.21
46.21
68.21
24.91
31.61
46.01

fi
14.91

24.11
71.01
69.71
73.81
13.51
65.21
31.01
9.71
55.71
38.31
53.21
24.61
22.71
63.31
58.01
60.81
53.51
61.31
35.61
35.41
22.21
9.31
41.01
28.01
23.71

ff:::'
,,,..

~

�9.31:

Whot ore your priorities for how the City spends your tox doll ors.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp;. 2= LOW, 4 &amp;. 5: HIGH, 3: HAS BEEN OMITTED

preventing crime
enforcing ord1 nences
traffic enforcement
fire protection
ombulence service
weter supply
sewer service
street repeir
pork &amp;. recreot ion
improve perking downtown
senior progrems
1mprove Cfty appearance
plan for future
weterfront improvement
interurben bus
economic development
Jl,32:

rt

58.91
53.41
91.81
72.91
86.11
83.91
78.71
48.31
40.81
22.51
55.41
79.71
56.21
41.11
42.21

16.91
27.01
1.11
10.41
7.11
8.31
2.31
31.61
37.61
41.11
23.21
13.31
24.81
39.61
23.11

How frequently do you use the following services.
( 1= never, 2= less Ulen 1 time/month, 3= one time/month)
(4= one time/week, 5= more often)

recycling center
interurb. bus service
river bluff perk
Seug-Doug 11 brery
ovor beocfl
Douglas beech
sun clown pork
shultz perk
Seug Dunes St. pork
beel'.'Y field

wicks perk
other perks
City Hell services

Q.all:

H1GH

62.9)

~I

1

79.21
66.91
64.81
34.91
9.81
68.71
84.71
64.51
52.81
78.21
51.81
67.41
30.81

2

8.71
27.01
26.41
46.41
28.21
17.91
10.81
26.21
26.81
12.11
22.41
18.01
38.71

_3_
8.71
0.61
4.51
12.01
21.11
7.51
3.11
3.71
13.11
2.51
8.31
11.41
21.51

4

3.41
1.41
0.61
3.41
18.41
0.81
0.81
3.41
1.11
2.81
12.21
1.21
6.01

5

Ml

4.11
3.71
3.41
22.51
5.01
0.61
2.31
6.11
4.21
5.31
2.11
3.01

If it meent en increese in generel property texes, which of the
follwing services do you tflink Saugatuck should increase or odd.

police protection
f 1re protect1on
better St. me1 ntenence
more perking
better wet er que 11 ty
better sidewelk
sidewelk snow removel
new street 1ight i ng
more flowers &amp;. trees
community Rec. center
seniors center
industriel perk
drei nege contro 1
tresh collection

CHECK!°
17.5
13.81
37.31
28.71
48.81
25.61
10.41
16.71
20.91
18.81
11.51
14.91
9.41

23.51

�g....3..3..:. cont.

com61ned meint. ger8ge
economic development
24hr. medic81 service
community poo 1

.QM;, Which of the following stetements is closet to your position on
government services end property texes.
nice to heve better services, but...
I would like better government services, ...
1oc81 government tnes to do to much, ...
other

!1.35: Pl ace e check before eech of the f o11 wing City boerds/

commissions 8t which you h8Ye et tended 8 meeting in the
1est 2 yeers.

city council
plenning commision
zoning t&gt;oerd of appee 1s
board of review(taxes
schoo 1 boord
Seug twp. fire district
i nterurben trons. system
Kol. Lk. water &amp; Sewer Auth.
~

-

CH~~~~
38. 11
21.41

17.51
8.61 ·
5.21
5.21
12.51

How responsive do you feel these parts of locol government are to
Saugatuck citizens.

NOTE: ORIGINAL RESPONSES HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED
1 &amp; 2= NOT RESPONSIVE, 4 &amp; 5= RESPONSIVE, 3= HAS BEEN OMITTED
NOT R~f ONS IVE
city council
5 . ,t
planning commision
44.71
zoning tioerd of eppeals
39.31
board of review(taxes)
49.81
school board
21.51
Seug. twp. fire district
3.51
interurban tnms. system
22.51
Kal. Lk. weter &amp; Sewer Auth.
33.51

g~

RESPSNS IVE

2 . 11

31.01
23.61
13.01
39.91
57.41
37 .Bl
31.61

Should the City adopt e policy of consolidating services with
other governmental units.
yes: 5B.01,

no= 7.51,

uncerte1n 34.51

Q.38:

If yes, what services should be consolidated.

NOTE:

THESE VALUES CORRESPOND TO THE PERCENT WHO ANSWERED
ABOVE
sewer
water
strorm water

·ves·

~~EP
54.01
37.11

I

�CHECKED

Q.38: cont:
pol1ce
street &amp; rocds
perks &amp; summer Rec.
ple~ning
zomng
building permits
ct ty meneger
comb. vehfcel metnt.
other

50.11

44.41
41 .81
44.11
44.91
30.51
28.51
36.81

Should the City of Seugetuck, the V11lege of Dougles1 end the
Township of Scugetucl&lt; consolidete into e single unh. of
government.
yes= 52.81,

no= 47.21

BACKGROUND INFORNATION
Q.40:

Are you a registerd voter.
yes= 85.41,

.QM;.

no= 14.61

How meny ye8rs heve·you resided 1n the City of Seugeituck.

CH~fiP

less then 1
1- 5
5 - 10
10-20
more than 20
Q.42:

15.21
21.11
29.11
32.51

How many more years do you think you will stay in the Saugetuck
area.

CHE~KED

less thtm one

3.

more than 1O yrs
~

*

5.61
20.81
69.61

1 - 3
4 - 10

How many months of each year do you typi ca 11 y reside in the
Saugatuck.

60.81 responded thct length of stay is 12 months
9.51 responded that length of stey is less then 6 months
Q~

Please check each of the following theit cpply to you.

residential property owner
renter
own or manage e business in area
Q.45:

C~CKiP
4.0
3.41
11.71

Which of the following best represents where you live.

(

on the dunes/bluff elong Lk. Ml
on the dunes olong Kolcmozoo Loke
elsewhere Dlong Kalamazoo Lake
81 ong Ka 1amazoo Ri Yer

CHECKiP

2.7

0.51
16.31
12.21

�gAS:.

cont.

CH~CKED

.01

along Silver Leke

elswllere elong the Kel. river
on hi 11 in Seug.
else. in Seug.
neer downtown Doug.
else. in Doug
in Arg. eree of Seug. twp.
else. 1n Saug. twp.

.QM;,

2.21
45.31
16.61
1.41
1. t I
0.51
0.01

Whet is the highest level of educetion you heYe finished.
CHECKED

less than high school
high school graduate
some co 11 ege
essociate's or technical degree
college graduete
grad. or prof. degree

1.11

12.3:i

18.61

1.61
36.71
29.61
I

g.47:

(

),

Please provide the following informetion abouteach person that
norma 11 y 1i ves in your houseno 1d.

A\/ERAGE AGE OF RESPONDENTS

54.32

SEX OF RESPONDENTS
mete
female

63.31
36.11

EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF RESPONDENTS
employed
not emp 1oyed

67.31
32.71

COMMUNITY
Douglas
City of Saugatuck
Seu~. Township
Hol end
other

7.51
44.01
0.51
24.11
23.71

PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS RETIRED

38.31

,.,,..\

I

�•

APPENDIX

D

Soil Types - Tri-Community Area

•

........-----=-•

�SOIL TYPES - TRI-COMMUNITY AREA

SOIL TYPE
AND SLOPE

SOIL NUMBER

LIMITATIONS FOR
SEPTIC TANK
ABSORPTION FIELDS

LIMITATIONS FOR
DWELLINGS WITH
BASEMENTS

CATEGORY A- SANDY, RAPID PERMEABILITY, LOW WATER TABLE

44B
Chelsea loamy fine sand, 0-6%
44C
Chelsea loamy fine sand, 6-12%
44D
Chelsea loamy fine sand, 12-18%
44E
Chelsea loamy fine sand, 18-30%
' l0B
Oakville fine sand, 0-6%
l0C
Oakville fine sand, 6-18%
J· l0E
Oakville fine sand, 18-45%
Oakville fine sand, loamy substratum, 0-6% 53B
Urban land - Oakville complex, 0-6% ·
72B

SE4
SE4
SEl, SE4
SEl, SE4
SE4
SE4
SEl, SE4
SE3, SE5, SE4
SL

CATEGORY B - SANDY, RAPID PERMEABILITY, IDGH WATER TABLE
'
Brady sandy loam, 0-3%
19A
SE3
&gt; 57A
Covert sand, 0-4%
SE3, SE4
. SE3, SE4
Matherton loam, 0-3%
22A
Metea loamy fine sand, 1-6%
27B
SE4, SE5
Metea loamy fine sand, 6-12%
27C
. SE4, SE5
Morocco fine sand, 0-3%
70A
SE3, SE4
Morocco-Newton complex, 0-3%
15B
SE3, SE4
Pipestone sand, 0-4%
SE3, SE4
26A
Thetford loamy fine sand, 0-4%
51A
SE3
Tedrow fine sand,0-4%
49A
SE3, SE4

SL
MDl
SEl
SEl
SL
MDl
SEl
SL
SE4

SE3
MD3
SE3
SL
MDl
SE3
SE3
SE3
SE3
SE3

CATEGORY C - WET, HEAVY, SLOW PERMEABILITY

Blount silt loam, 1-4%
Capac loam, 0-6%
Capac-Wixom complex, 1-4%
Glynwood clay loam, 1-6%
Glynwood clay loam, 6-12%
Kibbie fine sandy loam, 0-3%
Marlette loam, 6-12%
Marlette loam, 12-18%
Marlette loam, 18-35%
Marlette-Capac loams, 1-6%
Metamora sandy loam, 1-4%
Rimer loamy sand, 0-4%
Seward loamy fine sand, 1-6%

41B
16B
21B
SB
SC
33A
14C
14D
14E
75B
. 42B
28A
60B

SE3, SE5
SE3, SE5
SE3, SE5
SE5, SE3
SE5, SE3
SE3
SE5
SE1,SE5
SEl, SE5
SE3, SE5
SE5, SE3
SE3, SE5
SE5, SE3

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

SE3
SE3
SE3
MD3,MD2
MDl, MD2, MD3
SE3
MDl
SEl
SEl
SL
SE3
SE3
SL

�•

SOILTYPE
AND SLOPE

_ J,11\fITATIONS FOR
SEPTIC TANK
ABSORPTION FIELDS

SOIL NUMBER

LIMITATIONS FOR
DWELLINGS WITH
BASEMENTS

CATEGORY D - VERY WET SOILS, ORGANICS, FLOODPLAINS

-

Adrian muck
Algansee loamy sand, protected, 0-3%
Aquents and Histosols, ponded
Belleville loamy sand
Brookston loam
Belleville-Brookston complex
Cohoctah silt loam,
Cohoctah silt loam, protected
Colwood silt loam
Corunna sandy loam
Dune land and beaches
Glendora loamy sand
Glendora loamy sand, protected
Granby sandy loam
Houghton muck
- ·'
Martisco muck
Napolean muck
Newton mucky fine sand
Palms muck
Pewamo silt loam
Sebewa loam
Sloan silt loam

SE6, SE4
· SE3, SE{4

6
73A
50
48
.. 17
64
l ; • 29
· .J: 65
30
.,
36
::.:· 4
2
74
39

i'-,

.,
I

I

.

,I (

SE6, SE5
SE6
SE6, SE5
SE3, SES
SE6
SE6
SE6, SE5

SE6, SE3, SE4
SE6, SE4
SE6, SE4
SE6''' SE5·
.
SES, SE6, SE5
SE6
SE6, SE4
· SEU, SE6
, ..
SE5, SE6
'
,··. SE4, SE6
SES, SE3, SE5

5'.

67
47
69
7
45
23
62

SE6, SEl0
SES, SE3
SE6
SE6
SE6
SES, SE3
SE8,SE6
SE6
SE6

.,. ~'

...
,:

SES, SE3
SES, SE6
SE6
SE6, SEl0
SES, SE6
SE6, SEl0
SE6
SE6, SElO
SE6
SE6
SES, SE3

CATEGORY E · WELL DRAINED LOAM.AND LOAMY FINE SAND

Ockley loam, 6-12%
Ockley loam, 12-18%
Ockley loam, 18-30%
Riddles loam, 6-12%
Tekenink loamy fine sand, 6-12%
Tekenink loamy fine sand, 12-18%
Tekenink loamy fine sand, 18-35%

12C
12D
12E
63C
31C
31D
31E

~

MDl
SEl
SEl~
MDl
MDl
SEl
SEl

..t

MD2,MD1
SEl
SEl
MD1,MD2
MDl
SEl
SEl
&gt;

CATEGORY F · WELL DRAINED LOAM AND LOAMY FINE SAND

Ockley loam, 1-6%
Oshtemo-Chelsea complex, 0-6%
Oshtemo-Chelsea complex, 6-12%
Oshtemo-Chelsea complex, 12-18%
Oshtemo-Chelsea complex, 18-35%
Riddles loam, 1-6%
Tekenink loamy fine sand, 2-6%

... 12B
UB
UC
UD
UE
63B
31B

SL
SL
MDl
SEl
SEl
SL
SL

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

MD2
SL
MDl
·sEl
SEl
MD2
SL

'

�UNCLASSIFIED SOILS
Aquents, sandy and loamy
Pits
Udipsamments

34

18
66

KEY FOR LIMITATION CODES

SEVERE LIMITATIONS:
SEl
SE2
SE3
SE4
SE5
SE6
SE7
SEB

SE9
SEl0
SEll

SLOPE
SHRINK-SWELL
WETNESS
POOR FILTER
PERCSSLOWLY
PONDING
-CUTBANKS CAVE
FLOODING _.
EXCESSIVE HUMUS
LOW STRENGTH
SUBSIDES

MODERATE LIMITAXIONS:
MDl
MD2
MD3

SLOPE
SHRINK:: SWELL
WETNESS

SLIGHT LIMITATIONS:
SL

SLIGHT LIMITATIONS

.f

City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan

�! '

N

A

SAUGATUCK
SOIL TYPES

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010041">
                <text>Saugatuck_Comprehensive-Plan_1989</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010042">
                <text>City of Saugatuck Planning Commission, City of Saugatuck, Allegan County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010043">
                <text>1989-11</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010044">
                <text>City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010045">
                <text>The City of Saugatuck Comprehensive Plan was prepared by the City of Saugatuck Planning Commission in cooperation with the Saugatuck City Council and Coastal Zone Management Program, and with the assistance of the Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010046">
                <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010047">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010048">
                <text>Saugatuck (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010049">
                <text>Allegan County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010050">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010052">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010053">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010054">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010055">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038436">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54819" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59089">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/470ee678d8c9919c695441e06b46ee88.pdf</src>
        <authentication>33e3c38b9c874b89fe340eff97c18d61</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010177">
                    <text>Comprehensive Master Plan
City of Southfield

�Comprehensive Master Plan
City of Southfield

----

�RESOLUTION
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2006, City Council authorized the preparation of a Comprehensive
Master Plan to establish goals and guidelines to facilitate the direction,
redevelopment and growth of the City of Southfield into the future; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Department, in concert with a professional consultant, the Mayor,
City Council, and Planning Commission, and with input from a cross-section of
city administrative officials, city board and commission members and the resident
public, has caused the extensive evaluation of information comprehensive of
residential, business, and municipal interests essential to the development of a
comprehensive master plan; and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid information has been compiled into a Master Plan document that, in
addition to other purposes, will serve to:

•
•
•
•
•

establish a pattern for land use to guide development and redevelopment
provide a legal basis for zoning and other regulations, and a basis for
amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map
preserve or enhance natural resources
identify and recommend various infrastructure improvements and options
address the desires and needs of the residents, businesses and property
owners; and

WHEREAS, on December 17, 2008, pursuant to the requirements of Section 5.59,
Comprehensive Master Plan Procedure, of Article 4, Chapter 45, Title V, of the
Code of the City of Southfield, the Southfield Planning Commission conducted a
public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Master Plan and forwarded a
favorable recommendation to City Council; and
WHEREAS, in fulfillment of the aforesaid Comprehensive Master Plan Procedure
requirements of the City Code, the Southfield City Council has this date, April 13,
2009, conducted a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Master Plan
and has made the determination that the Master Plan document, with the revisions
outlined by the Master Plan Consultant in the April 1, 2009 memorandum to City
Council, will facilitate the overall future planning and redevelopment objectives
of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proposed Comprehensive Master Plan for
the City of Southfield is hereby adopted and that preparation of the final
Comprehensive Master Plan document is hereby directed; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with the aforementioned Comprehensive
Master Plan Procedure requirements of the City Code, City Council shall, no later
than five years from this date, review the Master Plan and determine whether to
commence the procedure to amend the Plan or adopt a new Plan.

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Acknowledgments
The Honorable Brenda L. Lawrence, Mayor
Donald F. Fracassi, Council President
Sylvia Jordan, Council President Pro Tern
Myron A. Frasier, Councilman
Sidney Lantz, Councilman
William D. Lattimore, Councilman
Joan Seymour, Councilwoman
Kenson J. Siver, Councilman
Nancy L. M. Banks, City Clerk
Irv M. Lowenberg, City Treasurer
James G. Scharret, City Administrator

Planning Commission
Brian Fifelski, Chairman
Robert Haisha, Vice Chairman
Darrell Kirby, Secretary
Roy Bell
Steve Huntington
Seymour Mandell
Carol Peoples

Project Consultant Team
Jacobs (formerly Carter &amp; Burgess)
LSL Planning, Inc.
Donald T. Iannone &amp; Associates, Inc.
Tetra Tech, Inc.
5 Star Engineering, Inc.

Comprehensive Master Plan
Steering Committee
Rosemerry Allen
Nicholas Banda
Roy Bell
John Beras
Myer Beresh
Robert Blanchard
Daniel Brightwell
Paul Cooper
Donald Fracassi
Rochelle Katz-Freeman
Warren Goodell
Marc Hardy
Yolanda Haynes
Lois Hitchcock
Brenda Lawrence
James Lemire
Cedric McSween
Frederick Najor
Carol Peoples
Louis Poole
Eddie Powers
James Ralph
Felix Seldon
Ellen Skuta
Kenson Siver
James Scharret
Stefan Stration
Ronald Roberts
Linnie Taylor
Cynthia Cooper Vails
Darla Van Hoey
Les E. Weigum
Erica Williams
Martin Williams
Warren Zweigel

Acknowledgments ii

�Table of Contents
Comprehensive Master Plan Resolution ............................................................................. i
Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... ii
Table of Contents ...................................... .................................................................. iii

1.

Introduction: A Comprehensive Master Plan for a New Century .............................. 1-1

2.

Governing Principles, Goals &amp; Recommendations/Strategies ................................... 2-1

3.

Population Trends ...................................................................................... 3-1

4.

Housing and Residential Character .................................................................. 4-1

5.

Economic Development ............................................................................... 5-1

6.

Managing Land Use for the Future .................................................................. 6-1

7.

Natural and Cultural Resources ..................................................................... 7-1

8.

Parks, Open Space and Recreation .................................................................. 8-1

9.

Transportation and Circulation ...................................................................... 9-1

10.

Public Facilities and Services ....................................................................... 10-1

11.

Community Utilities .................................................................................. 11-1

12.

Community Image. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 12-1

13.

Design Guidelines ..................................................................................... 13-1

14.

Stewardship and Implementation .................................................................... 14-1

Maps

Follows Page

Map 6-1: Existing land Use ........................................................................................
Map 6-2: Future Land Use ..........................................................................................
Map 7-1: Natural Features .........................................................................................
Map 8-1: Parks &amp; Open Space....................................................................................
Map 9-1: Existing &amp; Projected Traffic Conditions .............................................................
Map 9-2: Transportation Plan ......................................................................................
Map 9-3: Non-motorized Transportation &amp; Transit............................................................
Map 10-1: Community Facilities .................................................................................
Map 12-1: Community Image.....................................................................................

6-2
6-6
7-2
8-1
9-2
9-7
9-11
10-1
12-5

Appendices
Public Opinion Survey Summary
Economic Development Support Documentation

Southfield
,--

~-

Table of Conte nts iii

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

1

lntroduction ... A Comprehensive
Master Plan for a New Centur
•

What is the measure of a great
first-tier city?

•
•

The height of its buildings? The size of its municipal
complex? The number of "Fortune 500" companies
within its borders? The winning sports records of its
school district teams? Although each of these can
contribute to greatness, the ultimate measure of a
city's greatness is the quality of life it offers to its
residents and property owners.

A preferred place to make home
Southfield - one community, one city
A lively city to enjoy and have fun

As a result of the Strategic Plan the community has
come together to foster these goals into tangible
actions and initiatives that will:

Encourage Local Leadership. Encouraging
community dialogue and decision making; forge
coa1itions and partnerships among corporate and
residential owners; and build leadership consensus
through community and regional stakeholders. These
initiatives have been accomplished by providing
dramatic and extensive visual, physical and verbal
portrayals of the community.

A great sustainable first-tier city (Defined as a city
adjacent to or in close proximity to a major city like
Detroit. Because they are near the urban core, these
cities were among the first suburbs to develop in the
metropolitan region, and they are usually among the
oldest. Their economics and social networks are
often characterized by a strong interdependence with
their core city. First-tier cities are not completely
urban, nor do they fit the traditional description of
"suburban." They share physical, social, economic,
and cultural characteristics with both outlying, fastgrowing suburbs and core cities.) connects citizens
of a11 ages to great choices in housing, education,
employment, services, shopping, parks and natural
open space, entertainment and culture as well as to
opportunities to live in neighborhoods that are safe
secure and vibrant. A great first-tier city can be a '
place that nurtures the body, mind and spirit of those
who choose to make the city home - whether it is a
resident, business owner or a corporation.

Be Competitive. Continue to build on "location
location, location" as a key asset; remodeling agi,ng
housing stock, and making the community clean and
safe.
Incentivise the Private Sector. The City clearly
understands that recruiting multiple participants: one
person, one project is rarely enough. Using
inducements to reduce private sector risks,
eliminating red tape, expediting development through
"green tape," and relaxing some development
controls. The City also takes the lead in building
public support and consensus while maintaining and
strengthening infrastructure and providing
extraordinary public safety.

T? further advance this great first-tier community,

Think and Act Regionally. Continue to participate
with other first-tier cities, County and region to solve
issues together and work toward regional approaches
to economic development, land use and
transportation policies.

~1ty leaders embarked on a strategic planning process
m 2004 to find new ways to do business, stay focused
and be accountable. The City's Strategic Plan
concentrates on the current financial state of the City
as well as future economic projections. Other
conside~ed areas included community image,
econoilllc growth, city services and quality
d~~elopment/redevelopment. The Strategic Plan's
v1s10n was to develop strategies to increase revenue
develop initiatives, and decrease expenditures to '
maintain Southfield's strong business center and
q~ality neighborhoods. To achieve this vision the
City set these goals in place to sustain a viable
exciting and prosperous community:
'
•
Financially sound and sustainable city
government
•
Top quality city services
•
Quality development and redevelopment

Results Orientated, Continuously Asking. Has the
quality been improved? Will the deal prove
financially sound so that the return on investment
pays off? Has the City properly set the stage for
private investment? Is the development or
redevelopment sustainable?

Introduction 1-1

-

--- -

-

---

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

The dedication to maintain Southfield as a great firsttier City, has been recognized around the country. In
October 2007, Forbes Magazine's annual survey
named Southfield as one of the nation's most livable
metro-area suburbs. This recognition was based on
market research conducted by
neighborhoodscout.com; a statistics database that
measured the education level of residents, home
ownership rates, home values, quality of schools and
crime.

What is a Comprehensive
Master Plan?
Continued recognition for excellence as a great firsttier city is a main reason for this Comprehensive
Master Plan. This Plan describes a new vision for the
future of Southfield its neighborhoods and
commercial/business districts. Southfield's Zoning
Ordinance No. 1543 directs the Planning Department,
Planning Commission and City Council to prepare
and adopt a Comprehensive Master Plan for the
development and improvement of the City. This
Comprehensive Master Plan serves as a blueprint for
the development and revitalization activities in the
City. Implementation of this Plan will ensure that
Southfield remains a highly desirable community in
which to live, work, visit and learn. This can be
accomplished by preserving and enhancing the
qualities of the community that the residents,
businesses and property owners consider important.
The Comprehensive Master Plan is intended to:
■

■

■

■

■

Establish a pattern for land use which will
provide a sustainable community with a
diversified tax base to support the desired
facilities and services with reasonable tax rates.
Provide a legal basis for zoning and other
regulations for the type, intensity and timing of
development.
Ensure that, as development occurs, significant
parks and natural open space, cultural and
natural features are preserved or enhanced.
Recommend improvements to the transportation
system including roadway and technology
upgrades, traffic management tools to preserve
roadway capacity, access management
standards, and continued investment in nonmotorized and transit options.
Address the desires and needs of the residents,
businesses and property owners.

■

Coordinate land use recommendations with
anticipated land use changes, infrastructure
improvements and surrounding communities.

This vision of the City ' s future looks out 15 to 20
years to provide guidance on development-related
decisions that must be made on a day-to-day basis.
Some of the Plan's recommendations will occur
only when market conditions are right or when
necessary funding becomes available. Given the
current limited availability of public funds and land,
the Comprehensive Master Plan is an essential tool
in ensuring that Southfield makes the best use of
these scarce resources and in preventing the City
from pursuing policies or supporting projects that
work at cross-purposes.

Using the Comprehensive
Master Plan
The Mayor, City Council, Planning Commission, the
public, various agencies, businesses and developers
can all use the Plan to help guide and coordinate
decisions. The Plan serves to:
■

■

■

■

■

Guide expectations of those involved in new
development and redevelopment, and give the
public some degree of certainty about the plans
for the future.
Suggest where regional coordination is needed
along borders, road and natural corridors or
pathways that run through several communities;
and share services for cost effective attainment
of mutual goals.
Identify public improvements to roads,
streetscapes, gateways, district portals,
pathways, parks, utilities/infrastructure and
public facilities to support the overall Plan.
Assist in review of development proposals - to
confirm the proposal meets the goals and
recommendations/strategies of the
Comprehensive Master Plan.
Establish a criterion for reviewing rezoning
requests - to confirm the request is consistent
with the Future Land Use Plan, the appropriate
timing of the change, consistency with the goals
and strategies of the Comprehensive Master
Plan and potential impacts on Southfield.

Introduction 1-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•

Provide a basis for amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance and Zoning Map - to help realize
plan goals.

Comprehensive Master Plan Process
The Comprehensive Master Plan is the essential first
step in the overa11 community planning process.
This Plan will serve as a base for future planning
efforts during the upcoming years.
An assessment of existing data and documents was
conducted first, followed by the development of a
preliminary vision, governing principles and goals.
Next, the City received input from residents,
property and business owners and other community
stakeholders. From this input, the plan was refined
to state Southfield's vision on important issues and
to serve as a guide for future development and
policies.
The Comprehensive Master Plan is comprised of 14
Chapters:
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 14

Introduction
Governing Principles, Goals &amp;
Recommendations/Strategies
Population Trends
Housing &amp; Residential Character
Economic Development
Managing Land Use for the Future
Natural and Cultural Resources
Parks, Open Space and Recreation
Transportation and Circulation
Public Facilities and Services
Community Utilities
Community Image
Design Guidelines
Stewardship and Implementation

In each Chapter there is an inventory and analysis of
the existing and projected trends. The results of this
analysis were used in establishing
recommendations/strategies to achieve those goals.

Public Participation
Actively involving all residents and community
stakeholders in developing Southfield's
Comprehensive Master Plan was an important part of

the planning process. The Mayor and City Council
strongly believed public participation helps to ensure
that the resulting Comprehensive Master Plan
accurately reflects the vision, goals and values of the
community.
The Mayor and City Council endorsed the following
procedures designed to foster public participation,
open discussions, communication
programs/interviews, information services and public
meetings where advance notice was pro vided.

Project Kick-Off. In June 2006, the project kicked
off with a meeting between the Project Consultant
Team and the City's Planning Department to review
the work plan and a specific work schedule. The
kick-off meeting determined that the sub-area
planning districts included the City Centre, the
Telegraph Road corridor, the Southfield Road
corridor, and the Westside Residential area bordered
by Telegraph Road, 8 Mile Road , Inkster Road and
10 Mile Road.
Planning Commission/City Council Meeting. In
the summer of 2006 a joint meeting with the City
Council and Planning Commission was held to
provide an overview of the comprehensive planning
process, purpose and intent of a Comprehensive
Master Plan, and the process for community
involvement.
Community Tours. In the summer of 2006 the
Planning Department staff along with members of the
consultant team toured and photographed select areas
of the community that are in transition, recent
development/redevelopment projects and areas that
are in the pipeline for development/redevelopment.
Residents Public Opinion Surveys and
Community Newsletter. In the fall of 2006, a
survey and newsletter was mailed to all 35,000 city
households. Approximately 3 percent of residents
responded to begin framing issues and opportunities
for consideration. This led to identification of big
picture issues and opportunities, along with some
degree of prioritization. An overview and summary
of this survey is included in the Appendix.
Economic Development Interviews and Meetings.
At the end of 2006 through the first several months of
2007 approximately 25 interviews were conducted
with area community business leaders, property
owners, and representatives from Oakland County,
Detroit Regional Chamber, SEMCOG, Southfield
Public Schools, Lawrence Technological University,

Introduction 1-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Providence/St. John Hospital, Southfield Community
Foundation, Cornerstone Development Authority and
the City Centre Advisory Board. The intent of the
meetings was to develop an understanding of local
real estate and current business interests in
Southfield. Driving issues for economic
development in the City and the region, future trends
and major economic development opportunities were
also identified. Many of the interviewees also
expressed interest in participating in a business
round table.

Subarea Workshops. In the summer of 2007 four
subarea workshops were conducted in the City
Centre, Telegraph Road corridor, Southfield Road
corridor and Westside Residential subareas. In all,
approximately 190 interested residents, business
owners, property owners, citizen investors and other
community stakeholders attended these workshops.
The workshops provided an opportunity to detail
concerns and opportunities from a city-wide
perspective, but also to focus on the unique
characteristics of each subarea, and to get an account
of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and
challenges of these areas.
Comprehensive Master Plan Steering Committee
Meetings. Four meetings were held with
representatives of the Steering Committee to review
findings and recommendations on various chapters of
the Comprehensive Master Plan draft. The meetings
focused on each chapter of the Comprehensive
Master Plan and discussed the vision, goals,
recommendations/strategies; gathered additional
comments; and suggested recommendations.
Comprehensive Master Plan Adoption. On
December 17, 2008, the Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing on the proposed
Comprehensive Master Plan and forwarded a
favorable recommendation to City Council. The
Mayor and City Council conducted a public hearing
and adopted the Comprehensive Master Plan on April
13, 2009.

Introduction 1 -4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

2

Governing Principles, Goals &amp;
Recommendations/Strategies

Southfield's Vision ..... .

Declare the Necessity and Secure the
Future of Open Space

Southfield is a model of a successful urban
community. Southfield 's distinctive quality of life is
exemplified by its unparalleled physical beauty,
culture and diversity. People are its greatest
resource. The City is involved in an active
partnership with Southfield residents and businesses
to foster educational, cultural and economic
opportunities in a safe, vibrant and healthy
community.
The governing principles are guided by the overall
community vision and set the foundation for the
entire framework of the Comprehensive Master Plan.
Southfield ' s vision and its governing principles were
based on an evaluation of existing conditions, trends,
survey and input at numerous meetings. These
principles guided the development of the Future Land
Use Plan, goals and recommendations/strategies and
provided the fundamental concepts by which physical
planning needs to take place.
As the foundation of the Comprehensive Master Plan,
the vision and principles serve as a constant reminder
and guide for land use decisions and future planning.
The principles also provide direction to clearly
resolve issues or make decisions. Consistent
reference to the vision and principles ensures that the
concepts of the Comprehensive Master Plan are held
in place over time.

Open space areas are an essential part of Southfield' s
municipal fabric - river corridors, environmentally
sensitive areas, neighborhood and community parks,
tracts of private lands zoned for minimal
development, etc. These parks, and natural open
space areas collectively create an open space system
of green infrastructure. These areas contribute to
Southfield's cultural, health, recreational and
economic value, community identity and ultimately
its quality of life. This green infrastructure system
provides vistas, encourages active recreation,
provides natural infrastructure as storm water
retention, plant and animal habitat and improved
water quality, and is the strongest visual element
defining Southfield's sense of place.

Comprehensive Master Plan
Governing Principles
Reuse previously developed land
Declare the necessity and secure the future
of open spaces
Support the economic base
Support emerging economic growth sectors

Reuse Previously Developed Land
Reuse of previously developed lands, including
adaptive reuse of existing building stock, directs new
investment to sites which have the potential to
perform at a higher level than their current state.
This results in new investment in the City, maximizes
underused sites, and minimizes sprawl to other
outlying sites in the region.

Strengthen neighborhoods
Create and maintain connectivity
Encourage a mix of activities, uses and
densities
Support private actions that contribute to the
public realm
Take sustainable actions
Create efficiencies in delivery of public
services

Southfield
c--cr-

- - --

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-1

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

other public ways is critical to creating usable
systems for pedestrians.

Support the Economic Base
Supporting Southfield's economic foundation
includes maintaining job opportunities and the tax
base to ensure sustainability over time. Southfield
needs to remain an enticing location for businesses
when considering specific location requirements and
site competition with changes in real estate values.
This economic activity faces change as result of
global economic patterns, changing markets, new
regulations and aging of extensive infrastructure.
Nevertheless, fundamentals remain and the economic
contribution, sometimes taken for granted, is
significant.

Southfield has evolved as a unique mix of land uses,
building and housing types and activities. Mixed
uses provide sustainable opportunities for a diversity
of activity that segregated, uniform use~ do not
provide. By mixing uses and densities, active places
are created that help lead to sustainable destinations
that have a range of purposes.

Support Private Actions that
Contribute to the Public Realm

Support Emerging Economic Growth
Sectors
Emerging economic sectors add economic, cultural
and social diversity thereby keeping Southfield on the
map as a desirable place in which to do business.
Continued involvement and support of Oakland
County's emerging sector strategies and initiatives
and Michigan Economic Development Corporation' s
business and economic development programs will
foster new partnerships and collaborations between
existing Southfield businesses and outside companies
looking to expand into North America. These
emerging sectors can support the tax base and
develop a highly skilled workforce while diversifying
the economy.

Strengthen Neighborhoods
Southfield is defined by its neighborhoods, which
consist of a blend of lot sizes, housing age, housing
types, street design, cultural and religious affiliations,
and parks and open space. These distinct
neighborhood characteristics should be reinforced
through land use, transportation, neighborhood parks
and open space, and public service and facilities,
which strengthen their identity and contribute to
desirable places to live. Regional or local mixed uses
should not divide or impact the neighborhood
patterns.

Create and Maintain Connectivity
Connectivity is established through the streets, transit
system, sidewalks, bikeways and trails (local and
regional). All of these modes of travel should be
coordinated to create safe and convenient
transportation options. Non-motorized systems
should be considered more than recreation, because
they are important components of a comprehensive
transportation system. Maintaining sidewalks and

~Q_uthfiel~.

Encourage a Mix of Activities, Uses
and Densities

Private building and site construction and the City's
development regulations influence activity in
adjacent public areas such as parks, plazas,
streetscapes, open spaces, etc. Building form, height,
setbacks and detailing of building fa9ades
affect the adjacent areas. The uses and activity
contained in the buildings directly impact the
surroundings. Public areas should benefit from
adjacent private investment.

Take Sustainable Actions
Southfield should continue to initiate land use, site
design, transportation, building design and materials
policies and regulations which reduce consumption
of finite resources, generation of solid waste and
introduction of toxic materials to land, air and waters.
New development should be designed to incorporate
"green" technology and the use of modern
construction techniques to ensure its sustainability.

Create Efficiencies in Delivery of
Public Services
The costs of public services must be considered in
land use decisions. Street construction and
maintenance, utilities, fire, police, snow plowing and
recreation facilities are services directly related to the
physical location of development. Infrastructure
should help prescribe development location rather
than react to it.

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Goals and Recommendations/Strategies
Based on input gathered throughout the process, and an analysis of existing conditions and discussions with key
leaders in the City, the following list of goals has been developed to help achieve the vision and governing
principles of the City. Following each goal statement are recommendations or strategies that provide more specific
direction to accomplish the City's vision. Some of the recommendations and strategies are actively being
accomplished by various City departments and should be continued and/or supported to further advance the Plan's
goals.

Population Trends
Goal: Prepare to meet the needs of the future population in specific age groups.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Increase, improve or maintain communication with the school district to ensure awareness of major changes in the number
of school aged children. Future school expansions and closings should be planned accordingly.
b. Encourage economic development and industry recruitment that creates and retains jobs for young adults.
C.
Continue to foster adequate and affordable housing options, community facilities and services, and ensure health care
providers are present in Southfield to serve the needs of the age oriented (senior) population.
Goal: Acknowledge the diversity of Southfield's population through sponsored acts or festivities.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Keep recognizing and supporting heritage appreciation days, holidays, festivals and other events.
b. Provide continued support of the community's heritage and diversity through the future development of interpretive
centers/displays and museums.
Goal: Support area educational organizations to exceed the County's average education attainment level.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Support higher education enrollment efforts through college fairs and other informational workshops.
b. Coordinate a partnership with the school distric: to discourage high school drop outs and encourage graduation through
incentives and other educational resources .
Support
adult education courses to encourage high school equivalency diplomas.
J C.
i d. Support the school district's "career emphasis" school of choice programs.

...

Housing and Residential Character
Goal: Continue to preserve, protect and enhance the integrity, economic viability and livability of Southfield's neighborhoods.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Continue to limit or buffer non-residential intrusions into residential neighborhoods through open space, landscaping and
site design.
b. Maintain targeting property maintenance code enforcement and rehabilitation efforts in neighborhoods experiencing
declines in residential building and site maintenance.
c. Develop design standards for infill housing sites within existing residential neighborhoods.
d. Educate residents about available property maintenance tools such as home rehabilitation grants, tax credits and loans.
e. Continue to construct sidewalks and pathways that link neighborhoods to nearby community facilities and local mixed use
districts.
Goal: Provide a diverse and table housing stock for a range of housing opportunities for aJI income groups and a quality
living environment for all people.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Continue to encourage single-family home and lot ownership for all income groups in an effort to maintain the character
of Southfield.
b. Provide assistance and incentives (whether public expenditure, tax or regulatory) to local nonprofit housing organizations,
housing providers and other groups to expand housing opportunities.
c. Continue to promote larger lot, upscale housing opportunities in the northern and western parts of the City.
d. Improve promoting awareness of the housing and service needs for special groups such as low to moderate-income
households, seniors, physically challenged, and families in need of child or adult day care.
Goal: Create an identity for all Southfield neighborhood .
,... ~ Recommendations/Strategies
- a. Establish defined neighborhoods based on their character, history, and orientation; and develop specific improvement and
organization strategies that apply to those areas.
b. Continue to promote, develop and support block clubs and neighborhood association .
c. Encourage cooperation between community groups and the City.

~outhfield

.'

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

d.

Ile.

Incorporate streetscape improvements when developing neighborhood identities.
Develop a consistent theme of landscape improvements that will "brand" the community gateways, district portals, City
arks and natural o ens ace areas.

Economic Development
Goal: Business Area Competitiveness: Increase the competitiveness of Southfield's major business areas (corporate office,
technology sector, retail/service centers) for high quality business and job development.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Strengthen public transit service to the City's major business areas, helping workers access their jobs.
b. Continue to work with City Centre's private sector leaders to implement the new master plan recommendations
strengthening the City Centre area as the "business hub" of Southfield.
C. Create a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district or Corridor Improvement Authority (CIA) in the City Centre area.
d. Work with private sector leaders in the City's other business areas to implement the Comprehensive Master Plan's
recommendations relating to these areas.
e. Advance marketing efforts with property owners and realtors in the City's major business areas to attract new businesses
and jobs to these locations.
f. Remain consistent in identifying the top priority development and redevelopment sites in each business area where
development review and approvals can be accelerated as a result of pre-approved uses consistent with the City's new
Comprehensive Master Plan.
g. Continue to work with businesses and other stakeholders to increase shopping, green space and other desired amenities
supporting employers and employees in the City's business areas.
h. Work with LTU to enhance the City's image as a center for technology businesses and jobs through a technology marketing
initiative . .
l. Examine the feasibility of creating a Corridor Improvement District (CID) for the Telegraph Road corridor encouraging
technology business development.
j. Where appropriate, involve faith-based institutions and organizations in promoting and facilitating neighborhood economic
development, with a special focus on helping residents find quality jobs.
,~Goal: Existing Business Competitiveness: Increase the competitiveness of existing Southfield businesses to grow locaJJy.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Consider implementing a business needs assessment database using software such as Investigate Synchronist or Executive
Pulse, to enhance identification and response to Southfield employer needs.
b. Continue to strengthen a more intensive public-private sector existing business retention and expansion program, helping
Southfield companies to resolve problems and grow locally.
C. Continue to expand local businesses' awareness of available city, county and state business incentive and assistance
programs.
d. Expand services and incentives to entrepreneurs to start successful new businesses in the City. Work with LTU and key
regional entrepreneurial development organizations to accomplish this strategy.
e. Create an improved Business Assistance portal on the City's Web site to provide more detailed and user specific
information and data to support existing business expansion and new business attraction efforts.
Goal: Economic Diver ification: Diversify and grow Southfield's economic ba e in line with new global and technology
busine s realities.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Develop and implement a marketing strategy with two key components: Overall business image improvement, and target
industry and business area marketing. The first component builds the general image of the City as a place for business, and
the second markets specific locations within the City for specific industry and business uses and development.
b. Step up outreach to Southfield's large corporate employers to identify new business opportunities.
C. Keep preparing marketing-oriented development packages, including site identification, incentives, workforce skills, and
other information needed by companies in key industry sectors to be encouraged to grow in the City.
Goal: Re idential Workforce Competitivenes : Increase educational attainment and raise skills levels of Southfield residents to
compete for high quality jobs of the future.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Focus all future economic development efforts on increasing the number of high skilled and high wage jobs in Southfield.
~~b. Continue to develop a program to retain existing young talent and attract new young professionals to the City. Work with
local employers and LTU to undertake this initiative.
Further expand awareness of county and state workforce training and development services by Southfield employers.
d. Advance the relationship with LTU and other local higher education institutions to increase the use of local continuing
education and academic credit courses and market these programs to Southfield's employers and businesses.

-....

r

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Goal: Economic Development Partnership : Grow current and develop new partnerships fostering and accelerating economic
development in the City.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Encourage the Southfield Community Foundation to increase its financial assets and designate Economic and Community
Development as its top future financial investment priority.
b. Strengthen the City of Southfield's services and support to economic development by implementing the economic
development recommendations of the City' s new Comprehensive Master Plan.
c. Keep encouraging the Southfield Economic Leadership Team to strengthen the collaboration among the City, Chamber,
LTU, Community Foundation, Cornerstone Development Authority and other groups to get stronger economic
development results for Southfield.
d. Remain working with the Southfield Area Chamber to strengthen its services in a more defined way to rnpport local
economic development.
e. Continue to foster partnerships with key outside development groups, such as Oakland County and the state of Michigan.

Managing Land Use for the Future
Goal: Create a diversified and balanced mixture of land uses that will support the economic vitality, tax base and livability of
the City.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Improve the process for providing an enticing business environment to retain and attract businesses to expand the
economic diversity and economic strength.
b. Offer local mixed-use areas such as pharmacies, banks, dry cleaners and convenience stores at main intersections near
neighborhoods to provide goods and services compatible with the residential character of the surrounding area.
c. Continue to provide a transition from one use or grouping of uses to another through either a hierarchy of uses and/or
screening and buffering.
d. Continue to foster the revitalization and redevelopment of existing uses or areas which have become obsolete or are
showing signs of aging.
e. Step up the awareness of existing and future uses along the City's boundaries with other communities.
f. Continue the gradual elimination of non-conforming uses and incompatible land use patterns in accordance with the
Comprehensive Master Plan.
g. Keep coordinating and/or participate with adjacent communities to ensure land use policies and decisions coincide rather
than com ete.
Goal: Offer unified, well-organized residential neighborhoods that provide a traditional, livable environment for the City' s
residents.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Distinguish opportunities for high-density residential uses that could include attached single-family homes and more
innovative housing options in the City Centre or in areas of concentrated development.
b. Offer local mixed-use areas at some major intersections to serve nearby residents.
c. Continue to allow local institutional uses, such as local schools and churches, to develop in neighborhoods provided they
maintain a scale and intensity compatible with residential uses.
Goal: Provide for an appropriate amount of commercial, office and industrial uses, located for convenience and safety,
resulting in aesthetic business areas in the City.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Continue to create a commercial and office development pattern that is grouped together in strategic locations on arterials
that creates concentrations of activity.
b. Allow and integrate high density residential development into local and regional mixed-use areas.
c. Provide regional commercial development to offer shopping, service, and dining establishments of a larger scale to serve
the City and pass-by traffic without adverse impacts on traffic flow or nearby neighborhoods.
d. Keep consolidating industrial development to areas separated from residential to minimize impacts and improve the
quality of life for residents.
e. Continue to promote office and industrial uses to develop in a park setting with coordinated storm water management,
circulation, and screening.
f. Continue to ensure design reflects the quality and character of Southfield through site and building design standards that
ensure proper circulation, access management, landscaping, architectural design and "green" technology.
g. Continue to develop enforceable performance standards that regulate the levels of noise, fumes and other impacts of nonresidential development.

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-5

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Goal: Promote development and redevelopment of sites and buildings that fulfill the City'
desirability of the City for future development.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Maintain the ongoing list of public improvement projects and project locations that are targeted priorities for the City.
b. Step up the City's resources for incentives and a source of funding to stimulate development and redevelopment of priority
areas.
c. Continue to work with the Brownfield Redevelopment Authority to encourage development and redevelopment of
contaminated and obsolete sites.
d. Continue to incorporate land use and development strategies into the Tax Increment Financing Authority planning efforts.
e. Offer development incentives for projects employing high-quality design such as exceptional landscaping, architecture and
ublic spaces.

Natural and Cultural Resources
Goal: Regard land as an irreplaceable resource and ensure that its u e does not impair it value for future generations.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Continue to map, designate and protect environmental corridors from any new development.
b. Implement land use recommendations in the new Comprehensive Master Plan to improve land use patterns and encourage
compact and walkable mixed use neighborhoods that make more efficient use of land .
c. Recognize the interrelationship of adjacent landscape types and avoid breaking valuable ecological linkages.
d. Establish city-wide sustainable policy ordinances.
e. Use all practicable methods for increasing vegetative cover, including amendments to existing ordinance and regulations.
f.
Protect lands having significant natural values within the City' s limits and in outlying areas. Cooperate with other
governmental units and agencies to acquire or control valuable environments near the edges of the City where there are
multiple political jurisdictions.
g. Continue working with Oakland County to develop and promote a county-wide system of natural corridors (i.e. Rouge
Green Corridor as a framework to protect the natural environment and scenic values, provide outdoor recreation
opportunities and preserve for posterity the nature and diversity of the City's natural resources.)
' h. Identify unique, high quality natural environments and work with property owners, as well as city departments, boards and
commissions to protect these environments.
1.
Manage natural areas to control and remove noxious and invasive plant species. Prevent planting of invasive ornamental
plant materials and enforce the planting of native plant materials so natural buffers thrive along the City's streams and
wetlands.
Goal: Preserve cultural resources, including landsca es to maintain and enrich community character.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Expand creation of public information programs on historic resources.
b. Continue to support efforts that encourage the preservation of historic properties.
Goal: Balance the City's need for economic rowth and environmental health throu h sustainable use of natural resources.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Strive for Southfield to become a leader in energy efficiency and renewable energy.
b. Continue to actively support efforts to decrease city employee use of nonrenewable energy resources by using more fuel
efficient and cleaner burning motor vehicles. Continue to purchase hybrid vehicles as part of the City's fleet.
c. Encourage businesses and industries to use renewable power sources for heating, cooling and lighting.
d. Continue to establish regulations to reduce pollution through various environmental controls, working with businesses and
industries that have the potential to generate high levels of pollution.
Goal: Develop a fundamental vision for the arts and cultural life of the Ci through develo ment of a Cultural Art Plan.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Develop specific strategies to incorporate arts and culture into the lives of Southfield residents through increased
awareness and accessibility.
b. Continue to educate citizens on the benefits of a healthy arts and cultural community so that arts and culture can be an
integral component of activities, by developing an economic development strategy for arts and culture.
c. Actively pursue an ongoing dialog with local artists to identify and pursue opportunities.
d. Strengthen partnerships with local and other arts organizations, businesses, and others to identify and implement artsrelated activities into the community.
e. Continue to support the efforts of arts-based organizations in seeking funding for the development of art activities that are
o en and accessible to the ublic.

Southfield
--.--

~

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-6

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

' Parks, Open Space and Recreation
I Goal: Enhance existing park and recreation facilities and expand as needed to meet the evolving interests and needs of
Southfield residents.
Recommendations/Strategies
a.
Keep modernizing existing park facilities through upgrades in design, equipment and landscaping to keep all parks safe
and attractive.
b. Improve accessibility to the park system through a comprehensive pathway system throughout the City.
c.
Improve barrier free accessibility of the City's park and recreation facilities through accessible pathways, paving of
parking lots, and upgrading equipment to meet accessibility standards.
d. Prepare a city-wide, non-motorized transportation master plan.
e.
Continue the installation of entrance/directional/interpretive signage at all the parks that is consistent with city signage.
f.
Continue on-going maintenance and equipment replacement at all parks on a regular schedule.
g. Encourage volunteerism, neighborhood and garden club involvement for park clean-ups and maintenance of public areas.
h. Explore additional funding opportunities for park improvements.
i.
Continue to review the current Parks and Recreation Plan with regular updates every five years.
Goal: Develop a unified community-based open space system that protects key natural features and provides valuable
recreational opportunitie for appreciation of the City's natural resources.
Recommendations/Strategies
a.
Link neighborhoods, cultural, historical, civic facilities, parks, pathways and other destinations and facilities through open
space.
b. Continue to protect, acquire and develop parks and public open space along the Rouge Green Corridor, similar to the
Carpenter Lake Nature Preserve.
c.
Create ordinances and impact fees to require and plan open space areas in development and redevelopment projects.
d. Capitalize on utility and transportation corridors to create a linear open space system.
Goal: Offer a variety of recreation programs and events that promote a high quality of life and encourage interaction of
residents.
1Recommendations/Strategies
I a.
Keep monitoring recreation programs to ensure they meet the desires of residents and accommodate enrollment figures.
b. Continue to evaluate programming fees to create a balance between covering the City's costs while maintaining
affordability for residents.
c.
Continue to stay appraised of the latest trends and preferences in recreation and local desires.
d. Add to the variety of leisure programs offered, including wellness and fitness classes, in order to meet different interests
and skills.
e.
Continue to expand senior trips and group outings to meet the changing interests of seniors in the community.
f.
Continue to introduce more multi-generational events into future programming.
g. Continue to expand programming specifically for single adults in order to respond to the national trend of increased
single-headed households.
h. Explore and coordinate with other recreation providers to prevent duplication of services and avoid unnecessary
competition.

Public Facilities and Services
Recommendations/Strategies
a.
Monitor the efficiency of the City's various departments and offices, as done in the past, to prevent duplication of work.
b. Continue to increase coordination and cooperation among departments to streamline processes and ensure consistent
application of policies.
c.
Continue to ensure facilities are conveniently located and accessible for residents.
d. Coordinate services and facilities with surrounding communities, Oakland County and major healthcare providers.
e.
Keep monitoring a comprehensive geographic information system that links information regarding the City's facilities,
public rights-of-way and all lots and parcels within the City through mapping and data.
f.
Continue to regularly evaluate facilities to accommodate improvements and changes in technology.
Im rove visibilit of ublic safet throu h increased resence on the street and at civic events.

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-7

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

·. Community Utilities
Goal: Provide and maintain a high quality, cost effective, energy and re ource efficient public water upply, public wa tewater
service, torm water management and household refuse and recyclables collections for the community. Oversee the in tallation
of telecommunication facilities and power tran mission lines.
Recommendations/Strategies
Sanitary Storm Water Management
a.
Maintain the storm water drainage systems to meet or exceed service levels with an efficient use of resources.
b.
Provide and maintain a public storm water system capable of conveying storm water from public lands and rights-of-way
and discharging it in a manner that protects public health, safety and welfare.
c.
Encourage reduction of storm water runoff and low-impact development techniques for storm water management
wherever such practices are feasible.
Sanitary Sewer
d.
Maintain the wastewater system at acceptable service levels providing comparable service to all citizens.
e.
Continue to direct the planning, design, construction and repair of public sanitary sewer facilities.
Water Supply
f.
Continue to provide and maintain an adequate supply of safe water for drinking and fire protection, with quality service at
a reasonable price.
g.
Always encourage all water users to practice water conservation techniques to reduce demand for water.
h.
Provide sufficient water system redundancy to assure adequate service under stressed conditions.
Solid Waste Disposal
1.
Maintain household refuse and yard waste collection to meet or exceed service levels providing comparable service to all
citizens.
J.
Continue household refuse and yard waste collection at currently acceptable levels.
k.
Allow well-managed home composting in neighborhoods.
Telecommunications Facilities
1.
Ensure that telecommunication services are provided throughout the City in rights-of-way and other appropriate locations.
m. Provide equitable access for all service providers that use the distribution network in reaching their customers.
n.
Ensure that telecommunication lines are extended as redevelopment/development occurs.
o.
Maintain uninterrupted telecommunication service by developing an assertive and funded program to explore the
feasibility of installing underground telecommunication lines in neighborhoods and commercial/office districts.
Electrical Power
p.
Continue to ensure that all City residents receive energy services with facilities located in the City rights-of-way.
q.
Support reliability improvements to the electrical transmission system and balance the needs of citizens who reside
ad· acent to those facilities.

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-8

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Community Image
Goal: Promote commercial and residential development/redevelopment that is carefully considered, aesthetically pleasing, and
functional.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Adopt new design criteria for development proposals so new projects contribute to the community and complement
adjacent development.
b. Always ensure that development relates, connects and continues the design quality and site function .
Continue to encourage developments surrounding public places to enrich those places and encourage people to use them
C.
by enhanced architectural elements and building materials.
d. Advance the use of building and site design, landscaping and shielded lighting in buffering the visual impact of
development on residential areas.
e. Continue to incorporate pedestrian amenities into design of public and private development areas.
f. Keep encouraging sign design and placement that complements building architecture.
Continue to retain existing vegetation within development and consolidate landscaped areas.
o0 ·
h. Continue to preserve and encourage open space as a dominant element of the community' s image through parks, trails,
water features and other significant properties that provide public benefit.
Goal: Improve the highly visible public parks/open space/roadways to maintain community character and increase public
safety.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Continue to ensure that public places are designed to provide pedestrian-friendly amenities such as setting, landscaping,
kiosks, walkways, pavilions, canopies and awning.
b. Consider the edges of public places that abut residential development.
C.
Continue to provide clear and identifiable systems of sidewalks, walkways and trails.
d. Encourage buildings to be sited at or near public walkways without diminishing safe access or space for improvements.
e. Design streets to include amenities to enhance community character and provide safe pedestrian places.
f. Improve the process of locating community gateways and district portals and associated site improvements.
Goal: Enhance the identity and appearance of mixed use/commercial districts and residential neighborhoods.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Require development within the districts and neighborhoods to achieve a level of architectural quality and site
planning/improvements that enhances the visual image and identity of Southfield.
b. Continue to coordinate architectural design, landscape and signs to create a cohesive appearance and complementary
functions .
C.
Continue to require the perimeters of the commercial/mixed use areas to use appropriate plantings, lighting and signs to
blend with adjacent development and to buffer adjacent residential neighborhoods.
Goal: Protect and enhance Southfield's natural attributes.
Recommendations/Strategies
a. Continue to recognize the heritage and sustainable environment of the Rouge Green Corridor by continuing to support
and/or sponsor events and programs.
b. Continue to update the inventory of woodlands and wetlands.
C.
Step up incentives such as fee waivers and code flexibility to encourage preservation of the City ' s natural resources.
d. Improve working jointly with other jurisdictions, agencies, organizations and property owners to preserve natural
resources.

Southfield
....._,.

Governing Principles, Goals and Recommendations/Strategies 2-9

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

3

Population
Trends
Figure 3-1: Historical Population, Southfield Township

Goals

120,000

• Prepare to meet the needs of the future
population in specific age groups.
• Acknowledge the diversity of Southfield's
population through sponsored
acknowledgments or festivities.
• Support area educational organizations
to exceed the County's average
education attainment level.

□ Rest of Original Township
D City of Southfield
■ Original Township
8Q,0Q0 +-=====--====== ______,

100,000
C

0

."@
=&gt;

60,000

-+-----

40,000

-+------

Q.

0

c...

20,000
0 -·b ------=.s:.ii11!1!!1
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Current Conditions
Source: SEMCOG Historical Population

Understanding demographic changes over time helps
provide a better picture of what the future may hold
for a community. Analyzing past and present
demographic, social and economic data may help
Southfield anticipate future land use patterns and
community needs. This Comprehensive Plan uses a
wide range of community data as a foundation to
provide guidance for both land use and development
decisions. It uses the most current information
available, including the 2000 U.S. Census of
Population and Housing, the 2005 American
Community Survey, and local and regional
information to accurately reflect current conditions
and trends in Southfield.

Figure 3-2: Population &amp; Household Trends
90,000
80,000
70,000

•

•

•

•

•

•

♦

60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000

----- - - - - - - - - ---+-- Population

10,000

----

Households -

0

Population Trends. In 1950, Southfield Township
had approximately 18,500 residents and comprised
36 square miles, containing land now known as the
cities of Southfield and Lathrup Village and the
Villages of Bingham Hills, Franklin, and Beverly
Hills. Between 1950 and 1960, the cities and villages
in the Township began incorporating during a period
of rapid growth. In 1958, at the time of Southfield's
incorporation, the City had approximately 29,000
citizens. By 1970 that number had grown to nearly
70,000. Southfield's population reached more than
75,000
by 1980, but growth was already slowinob
.
considerably. The historical population growth of
Southfield can be seen in Figure 3- I, which depicts
the rapid growth spurt of 120 percent between the
time of the City's incorporation and 1970.

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

Source: SEMCOG Regional Forecast

population reported by the U.S. Census Bureau for
the year 2000; however, the recently released 2035
Forecast for Southeast Michigan by SEMCOG
predicts that the population will increase over the
next 30 years. As depicted in Figure 3-2, SEMCOG
forecasts that the population will increase to
approximately 80,600 by 2035, an increase of 3.9
percent over the 2005 population estimate.

As of May 2008, the city of Southfield had an
estimated 76,400 residents, according to the
Southeastern Michigan Council of Governments
(SEMCOG). This figure is down 2.5 percent from the

Southfield
,.•

Population Tre nds 3-1

2035

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Household Trends. The U.S. Census Bureau
defines a household as all persons inhabiting a
housing unit. Households can include one or
more families or one or more unrelated persons
who share living quarters. Southfield' s number
of households is forecasted to increase slightly.
This is due in part to a decreasing average
household size. Between 2000 and 2030, the
average household size is forecasted to decline
from 2.27 to 2.01 persons per household, as
seen in Figure 3-3. The decrease in household
size is more significant than the increase in the
number of households, resulting in a declining
population overall. Shrinking household size is
a national phenomenon as American families
are having fewer children on average.
Southfield's average household size is smaller
than those in Oakland County, metro Detroit
and the state of Michigan. This is likely due to
the high number of multiple-family housing
units, which typically house a higher proportion
of childless households. The large number of
multi-family households in Southfield is
discussed further in Chapter 4.
Age. The age distribution of the City's
residents has been slowly changing (see Figure
3-4). The aging of the baby-boomer generation
greatly impacts the community' s age
distribution over time. This effect is seen by
the recent reduction in the number of residents
in the 35-64 age bracket and increases in the
age 65+ age bracket. The share of residents in
the 35-64 age group is forecasted to decline
significantly as the baby boomer generation
advances into the 65+ group. The result of this
expected shift is a population that will be
equally distributed across the age categories;
however, a significantly higher share of
residents will be in the highest age bracket, one
that generally requires costly public services.
Southfield already has a higher percentage of
residents in the 65+ age group than Oakland
County, metro Detroit, and the state of
Michigan, as seen in Table 3-5. As this
segment of the population grows, the City must
adapt by providing services to meet their
changing needs.

Figure 3-3: Average Household Size
2 .5
~ 2.0

ci5

"C

:g 1.5
C1)

"'
~ 1.0
:,

C)

~0.5
0.0 - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

2030

2040

Source: SEMCOG Regional Forecast

Figure 3-4: Age Distribution, 1990-2030
35,000
30 ,000
25,000
C:

0

■

o
o
-

----

1990 Census
2000 Census
2030 SEMCOG
--

:; 20,000

ca

:i
Q.
0
0.

15,000
10,000
5,000

,Aqe 0-4

,Aqe 5-17 ,Aqe 1834

,Aqe 3564

,Aqe 65+

Source: SEMCOG Regional Forecast
Table 3-5: Retirement Population, 2000
Percentage
Community
15 %
Southfield
11%
Oakland County
12%
Metro Detroit
12%
Michigan
Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Population Trends 3-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan
Table 3-6: Racial Distribution, 1990-2000

Race. The racial distribution of Southfield residents
has experienced a major shift in recent years. In
1990, Southfield had a very balanced racial mix,
generally in line with the County as a whole. The
population was comprised primarily of white and
black residentsi. Between 1990 and 2000, the number
of white residents declined by nearly 21 ,000 or over
40 percent, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, as
shown in Table 3-6. During the same period, the
black population increased by more than 20,000. This
significant shift resulted in the black population now
comprising more than 54 percent of Southfield
residents. This trend is consistent with other
communities across the Detroit metro area, as the
suburbs of Detroit gained nearly twice as many black
residents between 1990 and 2000 than any other
racial or ethnic groupii_
Income. Southfield ' s residents are primarily middleclass. In constant dollars, the median household
income fell approximately 3 .5 percent over 10 years
to $52,468, as seen in Table 3-7. Southfield has a
higher median household income than the Detroit
metro area as a whole, although the margin is
shrinking, as can be seen in Figure 3-8. On the
other hand, incomes in Southfield are
approximately 15 percent lower than in Oakland
County. The County ' s large number of wealthy
outer-ring suburbs helps explain this discrepancy.
Additionally, the City' s higher proportion of older
residents tends to suppress median income
because retirees generally have less income than
working households.

#

#

%

White

51 ,427

%
68 %

Black

22 ,053

29 %

42,454

54 %

190

0%

157

0%

1,790

2%

2,416

3%

11

0%

24

0%

275

0%

498

1%

2,3 42

3%

American Indian
Asian
Pacific I lander
Other Race

NIA

Multi-Racial

39%

78 ,322

75 ,746

Total

30,431

Source: SEMCOG Regional Forecast

Table 3-7: Median Household Income, 1990-2000
(in 1999 dollars)
Community

1990

2000

Southfield
Oakland Co.
Metro Detroit
Source: U.S. Census Bureau

54,380
58, 170
46,584

52,468
61 ,907
49 ,175

Figure 3-8: Median Household Income, 2000
$70,000

•

Q)

E
0

$60,000

j.-

0

.E

------

$50,000

"O

0

.r:.

$40,000

Q)

IA

::s

0

::c
C

Income varies across neighborhoods. Residents
with higher incomes have more choice on where
to live. Neighborhoods with high numbers of
upper-income residents tend to be more stable.
Conversely, those with high concentrations of
lower-income residents tend to be less stable and
can lead to declining home values and increasing
safety concerns. Figure 3-9 shows the variation
in median income across the various
neighborhoods in Southfield. Most
neighborhoods fall in the middle income
categories, but several have high concentrations
of lower-income or upper-income residents.
These areas are generally dispersed throughout
the City and no large concentrations of high or
low income neighborhoods are found. The
neighborhoods in the lowest income bracket
contain the high concentrations of multiple-family
units in Southfield which includes some of the
most affordable housing in the City.

2000

1990
Race

cu

:s
Q)

:E

$30,000

-

-- - - - Southfield

$20,000

- . - Oakland Co.
Metro Detroit

$10,000
$1990

2000

Source: U .S. Census Bureau

Figure 3-9: Median Household Income by Neighborhood, 2000

Household Income

$35.000 $::)0 600
$50 600 - $66 200
$66 201 - $81 700
&gt;$8"1 700

Source: U.S . Census Bureau

Population Trends 3-3

---------

-- -

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Education. A snapshot of the educational
characteristics of the City is important
because education levels are strongly
related to economic success, particularly
as Michigan and metropolitan Detroit
transition from a manufacturing
economy to one that is largely
knowledge-based. Concentrations of
educated citizens attract and sustain jobs
and tend to provide governments with a
higher tax base. The educational
attainment of Southfield· s adults is
slightly higher than the metro area and
slightly lower than Oakland County, as
seen in Figure 3-10. Eighty-seven
percent of Southfield adults 25-years-old
or older have at least a high school
diploma, compared to 9 I percent in the
County and 87 percent in the metro area.
Forty-six percent of residents have a
co11ege degree, compared to 49 percent
in the County and 34 percent in the
metro area.

Figure 3-10: Educational Attainment of Adults 25 Years or Older, 2005

100% T
D Southfield
D Oakland Co .
o Detroit tv1etro

t
f

80%
60%
40%

46% 9%

20%

34%

0%
High School
Diploma

College Degree

Graduate Degree

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Figure 3-11: School Enrollment of Population Three Years and Older, 2005

School enrollment data gives a slightly
different picture of the educational
characteristics of the community. A
significantly higher proportion (35
percent) of Southfield's population is
enrolled in college or graduate school
than in the County or metro area, as seen
in Figure 3-11 . The relatively high
number of colleges and uni versities in
Southfield accounts for the high posthigh school enrollment. The high
proportion of these students has likely
created the environment which
Southfield employers find attractive and
has made Southfield a major
employment center in metro Detroit.

Kindergarten &amp; Preschool

I

Elementary School
Middle School
I

High School
College
-

Graduate School

.,_[S
____,

0%
D Southfield

■

5%

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Oakland County

o Detro it Metro

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

If Southfield can be proactive in enticing
students with college degrees to remain in the City
after graduation, it will see its share of high schooland college-educated residents rise, ultimately
helping to preserve and strengthen its healthy
economy.
i Fasenfest, D. , Booza, J. , Metzger, K. (2004). Living
Together: A New Look at Racial and Ethnic
Integration in Metropolitan Neighborhoods, 19902000. Brookings Institution Center on Urban and
Metropolitan Policy.
ii Brookings Institution. (2003). Detroit In Focus: A
Profile from Census 2000. Brookings In titution
Center on rban and Metropolitan Policy.

$outhfield

Population Trends 3-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

4

Housing and
Residential Character
Occupancy. Housing occupancy is the percentage of
total housing units that are occupied at a given time.
The figure can be an indicator of housing stability,
with a high percentage generally indicating a stable
or growing residential housing market. With little
change in population or households and a shrinking
average household size, demand for hollsing can be
expected to decline. This is reflected in Figure 4-2
which depicts a drop in occupied housing units along
with a continuing increase in the housing stock. It is
also reflected in the occupancy rate, which declined
from 95 percent in 2000 to 89 percent in 2005, as
shown in Figure 4-3. Over the same period, Oakland
County also experienced a similar decline in
occupancy from 96 percent to 93 percent.

Goals
• Continue to preserve, protect and enhance
the integrity, economic viability and livability
of Southfield's neighborhoods.
• Provide a diverse and stable housing stock
offering a range of housing opportunities for
all income groups and a quality living
environment for all persons.
• Create an identity for all Southfield
neighborhoods.

Current Conditions
This Chapter provides background information on
housing in Southfield and some comparisons with
historical data and the region. The evaluation
serves as a basis for the future land use plan and
strategies regarding housing and public
improvements to support the needs of residents.

Figure 4-1: Southfield Residential Construction, 1990-2005

-

350

Net Residential Perm its
5-Year Avg .

~ 300
E
~ 250

0.

Planning for housing is critical because nearly 60
percent of land in the City is devoted to
residential uses. Also, people seeking a place to
live or deciding whether to stay in a community
base their decisions in part on the community's
housing characteristics such as home values,
affordability, services and amenities.

-

:i 200
C:

~ 150

·;;

~ 100
~

50

0 --L-- - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - ~ - - - 1990

Housing Units. According to the U.S. Census
Bureau, a housing unit may be a house, an
apartment, a group of rooms or a single room.
Housing units are occupied by families or
individuals who live separately from other
families/individuals in the building and have
direct access from outside the building or through
a common hall.
The number of housing units in Southfield has
been increasing while population and household
growth have been relatively flat. (Chapter 3
Population Trends has a detailed discussion of
population characteristics.) Figure 4-1 shows the
annual number of net building permits from 1990
to 2005 increased by about 2,000 units. Figure 42 shows the total number of housing units in
Southfield over the same period according to the
U.S. Census Bureau. Both sources note a slow but
gradual increase in total housing units.

1992 1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

Source: SEMCOG Regional Forecast

Figure 4-2: Southfield Housing Units and Occupancy, 1990-2005
40 ,000

37,049
35 ,698
35,054
36,000 - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ 38,000
Cl)

34,000

C:

32,000

C)

30,000

=

:::,
C:

·;
:l
0

:I:

32,908

32,112 _

28 ,000
--- -

26 ,000

-

-------

Housing Units
- - - Occupied Units

24,000
22 ,000
20 ,000
1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Housing and Residential Character 4-1

2010

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Residential construction has been fairly
responsive to recent population trends.
The net number of residential building
permits issued in Southfield peaked in
1998 and has generally been declining
since, mirroring the City ' s population
change.
Certain neighborhoods have more vacant
housing units than others. These
neighborhoods may face challenges like a
housing stock in various state of repairs
and low interest in homes relative to home
prices. Identifying the location of those
neighborhoods helps in addressing their
issues and reducing vacancies. The areas
with the highest vacancies can be seen in
Figure 4-4. These areas are generally
south of Northwestern Highway from the
City Centre area to Franklin Road ; along I696 west of Telegraph Road; around the
Cornerstone Development Authority
district; and between Telegraph Road and
Beech Woods Park, south of 9 Mile.

Figure 4-3: Regional Occupancy Rate, 1990-2005

100%
95 .8%

94.9%

(I)

95%

ca

cc

90%
&gt;(.)

----

91 .6%

C

ca

Q.

:::,

85%

--

88 .8%

-

(.)
(.)

0

80%

---

-

Southfield - - - Oakland Co .

75%
1985

1990

1995

2000

Certain neighborhoods in Southfield are
experiencing lower homeownership rates
than others. These areas are generally less
stable because the residents can

'2outhfi~l&lt;1.

2010

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Figure 4-4: Southfield Vacancy Rates, 2000

Vacancy Rate
2000 Block Groups
0% -2 4%

Home Ownership. Even with occasional
drops in housing value, home ownership is
the single largest factor in the generation of
wealth for individuals and families. Like
occupancy rates, the percentage of owneroccupied housing units can be an indicator
of housing stability.
In 2005, approximately 58 percent of
Southfield residents owned their residence
while 42 percent rented . The home
ownership rate is up from approximately
54 percent in 1990 and 2000. As Figure 45 shows, home ownership rates are
significantly lower in Southfield than in
Oakland County. This can be expected
given the large portion of multiple-family
residential units, particularly apartments, in
Southfield. Nevertheless, ownership is
rising in Southfield faster than in the
County, especially over the last five years,
where ownership is up nearly 4 percent.
Home ownership is rising despite rising
housing costs (noted below) and
decreasing median household incomes
(noted above in Chapter 3 Population
Trends ).

2005

?"fi

2. 5% - 4 .6%

4 7%- 7 6%
-

7.7% - 11 .4%

-

11 .5% - 22 .0%

Source: U.S . Census Bureau

Figure 4-5: Regional Home Ownership Rate, 1990-2005

90%
80%
70%
.9.c 60%
f?Q)
50%
C
~
0 40%

72 .7%

·-----

74.7%
■

76.4%

--

54 .1%- -58.0%- - -

53 .9%

Q)

E 30%
:::c: 20%
0

Southfield
- - - - ------ Oakland Co ..

10%
0%
1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: U.S . Census Bureau

Housing and Residential Character 4-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

easily move out of the neighborhood. Many of
these neighborhoods have high numbers of
multiple-family units. These areas are
highlighted in Figure 4-6 and include the areas
around Northland, northwest of the Telegraph/I696 interchange; along Shiawassee east of Beech;
between Telegraph and Lahser; the City Centre;
and along I-696 on the City's eastern edge.
Housing Costs. The cost of housing combined
with income determines housing affordability,
and housing has been getting more expensive in
Southfield. According to the U.S . Census
Bureau, the median value of owner-occupied
homes in Southfield was $155 ,400 in 2000, up
from $107,705 in 1990 (both figures in 2000
dollars). Data from Oakland County indicates
that average housing costs have continued to rise
from $161,217 in 2001 to $182,820 in 2005. The
rising cost of housing, depicted in Figure 4-7,
makes it increasingly difficult for potential home
buyers to enter the housing market. The recent
decline in occupancy rates since 2000, noted
above, may hint that the rise in housing prices has
been outpacing demand for housing. As of 2005,
this decline in occupancy did yet not appear to
have slowed the rising cost of housing as might
be expected.

Figure 4-6: Southfield Homeownership Rates, 2000

Ownership Rate
2000 Block Groups

1111

20 6%-531%
53.2% - 78.8%

78.9% - 93 .3%
93.4%- 100%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Figure 4-7: Southfield Housing Values, 1990-2005

$200 ,000 182 820
$180,000 176 424-=--,
$160,000 __________ 161,217, ~

Q)

$140,000 - ~ - - - - - - -155,400- - - - - $120,000 + - ---- -- - - - - -

~ $100 ,000

&gt;
The most recent housing statistics (September
2006) from the Michigan Association of
Realtors® indicate that the rising housing values
may be coming to an end. The number of
housing sales in 2006 was 21 percent lower than
in 2005 in southern Oakland County. This
resulted in a 3 percent reduction in average sales
price over that period. Statistics from the
National Association of Realtors® indicate
existing home prices in metro Detroit experienced
the worst decline of U.S. urban areas in the third
quarter of 2006. As a result, housing values in
Southfield may be in the midst of a period of
adjustment as housing values dropped in 2007.
As it became more expensive to buy a home in
Southfield in the first half of the decade, home
ownership rates continued to rise, as noted above.
However, while housing price increases can
generate wealth for those who already own a home,
they can increase property taxes and make it more
expensive to buy a home. Figure 4-8 portrays the
distribution of housing values in Southfield in 2000.
Housing values were distributed fairly even, with
the great majority of homes valued between
$100,000 and $200,000. This general distribution is
a reasonable approximation of current conditions
despite the fluctuating housing market.
'

0%- 20 5%

-+--------------- - - - - -

$80,000 ___ 107 ,705 _ _ _ _ _ _ __
$60 ,000 - - - - $40,000 - - - + - - - - - - - - - - fv1edian Price $20 ,000 - + - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
__
_ A
_v_e_r_a _g _e P_r_ic_e__ _
$0 - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - -- - - -

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Oakland County

Figure 4-8: Southfield Housing Values, 2000

7,000
6,000
&gt;,

-

5,190-

5,728

---------

5,000

(J

C

C1)

4,000

::,

C"

Q)

2 ,752

3,000

2,183

~

l1.

2,000
1,000

- 153

-

2 s9 -

31 -

17

0
&lt; $50k $50k- $100k- $150k- $200k- $300k- $500k- &gt;$1 M

$100k $150k $200k $300k $500k

$1 M

Value

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Housing and Residential Character 4-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Southfield has a large supply of rental housing,
particularly when compared with the region as a
whole. Figure 4-9 shows that in 2000, rental housing
comprised 46 percent of Southfield ' s occupied
housing units, compared to just 25 percent in
Oakland County and 28 percent in the metro area.
Further, the share of rental housing in Southfield was
unchanged since 1990 while simultaneously
shrinking in the County and metro area.
As the share of rental units increases, a higher
percentage of households are impacted by rental
rates. In 2000, gross rents for Southfield residents
were higher on average than for residents in
Oakland County or metropolitan Detroit.
Renters appear to be willing to pay a premium
to live in Southfield. The median gross rent
Southfield residents paid in 2000 was nearly
$800 per month, compared to $710 per month
in the County and $580 per month in the metro
area. Figure 4-10 shows the distribution of
gross rent paid by residents of Southfield
compared to those of Oakland County and the
metro area. A higher share of Southfield
households pay higher rents than in the County
and metro area, especially in the $750 to $999
per month category.
As noted in Chapter 3 Population Trends, the
median household income declined slightly
between 1990 and 2000 and was lower than
that of Oakland County for the entire period.
When combined with increasing rents,
Southfield renters should be spending a higher
portion of their income on rent. This, however,
does not appear to be the case. As Figure 4-11
shows, the portion of income spent on rent is
generally comparable in Southfield and in the
County. The largest discrepancy occurs in the
15-19.9 percent category, where a larger
relative portion of Southfield renters are paying
a smaller share of their income as rent. This
may be related to the poverty rate in Southfield,
which is higher than in the rest of the County.
Low-income residents are more likely to
receive housing assistance, which would lower
their rents relative to their incomes.

Figure 4-9: Regional Residential Rental Share, 1990-2000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
D Southfield

50% 45% .~
40%

■

Oakland Co . D Metro Detroit

rf -

35%

+

30%
25%
45.9%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0% -'--- - ' - - -

45.8%

2000

1990

Figure 4-10: Regional Gross Rent, 2000
45%

t---

. D Southfield ■ Oakland Co. D fv1etro Detroit

40%
35% ..,...
~30%
~25%
~20%

~
0

15%
10%
5%
0% _,__,___...._.__,_____._----'-'__-'---,....._,'-----'_.._._____.____.____._____.___L-1__
Less
than
$~0

$200to $300to $500to $750to
$299
$499
$749
$999

$\000
to
$~W

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Figure 4-11: Regional Rent as a Percentage of Household Income, 2005
ti)

40%
35%

J

o Southfield

■

Oakland Co . - - - - -

I,,,.

.S
c

30% + - - - - - - -

~25% ~
20%

o

-e
;

(1)

a.

15%
10%
5%
0%
&lt;

15.0%

15.0% - 20.0% - 25.0% - 30.0% &gt;
19.9% 24.9% 29.9% 34.9% 35.0%

NA

Housing Types. Single-family detached
Percent of Household Income
residences comprise the largest share of
residential housing. In 2000, these types of
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
housing structures comprised nearly 50 percent
of all residences. Nearly half of the remaininob
Figure 4-12. According to the 2000 census,
housing units were in multiple-family structures with
Southfield has an approximate 23 percent lower share
20 or more units. Relative to the surrounding area,
of single-family residential units and a much larger
detached single-family residential homes comprised a
share
of multiple-family residential units compared to
low _portion and multiple-family residences a high
Oakland
County and metro Detroit. In particular, the
port10n of Southfield's total housing units, as seen in

~outhfield~

~

HSO0 No cash
or more
rent

Housing and Residential Character 4-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

share of large (i.e. containing 20 or more units) multifamily structures in Southfield is nearly 3.5 times that
of the County or metro area. Many of these structures
are apartment and condominium towers. The
presence of apartment buildings helps explain the
high residential rental share noted above and
reemphasizes the impact that higher rents have on
Southfield' s large rental population. The acres of
land devoted to multiple-family residences can be a
deceiving statistic; residential densities can vary
widely within the multiple-family designation .

Age of Existing Housing. Southfield has a diverse
mix of housing that has been developed over the
course of its history and the City ' s residential
architecture reflects the historical growth of the
community. In the early 1950s, prior to the City' s
incorporation, the township of Southfield was home
to approximately 19,000 residents. By the end of the
1970s, the City had more than 75 ,000 residents. This
explosive growth is reflected in the age of
Southfield 's housing stock. As Figure 4-13 shows,
the greatest share of existing housing units were
constructed during that period. Afterward, as the
population growth flattened , the share of new
structures decreased . Only about 8 percent of
Southfield homes were built since 1990. Because
Southfield is largely built out, the annual number of
new structures can be expected to remain low as new
development will primarily con ist of redevelopment
of existing land. Over time, as newer structures
replace older ones and as residential densities
increase, the share of newer housing units will begin
to increase. As the housing stock continues to age,
efforts to preserve and rehabilitate existing units will
be critical in preserving property values and
maintaining a high quality of life for Southfield ' s
residents.
The City may want to consider preparing a survey of
neighborhoods to document historic resources and
evaluate their significance. These historic structures
and neighborhoods provide character and a sense of
uniqueness to the neighborhood and community. The
survey would re ult in recommendations and
guidance on improvements and maintenance of these
historic residential treasures.

Residential Longevity. The length of time that
residents live in a home is a measure of a
community ' s stability. In 2005 , nearly 50 percent of
Southfield residents had moved into their home in
2000 or later. This statistic can be seen in Figure 414. While this figure may seem high, it is in line with
U.S. households on the whole. In Southfield, as
noted in Chapter 3, the City ' s racial makeup changed
significantly sometime after 1990, indicating a large
number of residents moved out of the City and an

'2Quthfield
I

I

Figure 4-12: Regional Residential Housing Distribution, 2000
1-unit, detached e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::~~

!. 1-unrr, attached
~

-

2 untis

·2

3-4 units

C)
C:

5-9 unrrs

::::,

·;;

:,
0

o Southfield
■ Oakland Co .

10-19 units

J:

□ tv1etro Detroit
---

20+ units

-,-------

l'vbbile homa

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Percent of Housing Units

Source: U.S . Census Bureau

Figure 4-13: Year Built for Southfield Residential Structures, 2005

..u

14 ,000 l

~ 12 ,000

:l
:l

10 ,000

~ 8 ,000

-..
0

6 ,000

Q)

4,000

..0

E

:l

z

2 ,000
0
ro9 or '940 to '950 to '960 to 'e70 to '980 to 'BOO to 2000
before '949
'959
'B69
'979
'989
'999
to
2004

2005
or

after

Year Structure Built

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Figure 4-14: Year Householder Moved Into Unit, 2005

~

o
J:
~

5
J:

0

!

E

~

20 ,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -16,19618 ,000
16,000
14,000 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------t
12,000 __,___ _
10 ,000 - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 ,000 - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6,000 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 4,000
1,4531,865
2,000
0 ...L---L---'--- -'--.._____ __,____.__ __.,__ _,____ __,____.__ __.,__...__
1969 or
earlier

1970 to
1979

1980 to
1989

1990to
1994

1995 to
1999

Year Household Moved Into Unit

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Housing and Residential Character 4-5

2000 or

later

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Pion

equally large number moved in. Additionally, renters
can be expected to move more frequently than
homeowners. These conditions help explain the high
frequency of households that moved after 1999. As
the housing market slows relocation options residents
can be expected to remain in their homes for longer
durations, as was the case in the 1990s before the
housing boom.

Recommendations
Southfield' s neighborhoods are diverse in nature,
ranging from suburban neighborhoods characterized
by unpaved roads and larger lot sizes to urban
development with curb and gutter streets and narrow
lots. This mixture of housing options aJlows families
to grow into larger homes without having to move
out of the community. As developments are planned ,
they should be designed to complement and enhance
the existing character of the surrounding
neighborhoods. The recommendations of this chapter
seek to retain neighborhood character while
improving the quality of homes, public facilities and
infrastructure.

Housing Preservation and Maintenance. The
importance of maintaining housing units on a daily
basis cannot be overemphasized. To ensure the
preservation and maintenance of existing housing by
property owners, Southfield should use a variety of
basic strategies/programs to improve the appearance
and value of existing neighborhoods, as described
below.
Neighborhood and Information Center (NIC).
As part of the Community Relations Department,
the City' s Neighborhood and Information Center
(NIC) provides a link between City government
and Southfield residents. For visitors, home
seekers and homeowners, the NIC is a valuable
source of information about the City. The Center
provides relocation information, welcome
packets, school information, as well as
information about City services and programs.
More than just an information source, the NIC
serves as a liaison to City government for
residents and neighborhood associations, refers
complaints to City departments, and monitors
their resolution. The NIC also strengthens
existing neighborhood associations and
reactivates dormant ones, arranges for
neighborhood association block parties, meeting
rooms and mailings, ~nd arranges yearly training
and workshops for neighborhood leaders. NIC
should continue to maintain consistent

Sou_thfieJQ.

•

coordination with the Housing Department and
administration of many of the programs and
recommendations of this Plan.
Housing Programs. The City ' s Housing
Department currently administers a variety of
optional programs to residents including home
repair, ownership encouragement and housing
affordability as described below:

Section 8. The U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) provides
funding for its Housing Choice Voucher
(HCV) Program, formerly known as Section
8. The HCV Program subsidizes rent for
income-qualified individuals through the
Southfield Housing Commission. As a
tenant-based program, the Voucher holder is
subsidized - not the rental unit. The Program
is often referred to as "Finders Keepers"
because the family must locate a unit that
meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS)
established by HUD .
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG). The city of Southfield receives
CDBG funds annually from HUD. Fund
allocations are based on development of
viable urban communities by providing
proper housing and a suitable living
environment, and by expanding economic
opportunities, principally for persons of low
and moderate income. The CDBG program
allows the city of Southfield to develop and
implement activities and projects that are
uniquely suited and beneficial to Southfield
residents within the framework of federal
guidelines.
The Southfield Home Improvement
Program (SHIP). SHIP is a low-interest
loan program for income qualified
homeowners. The focus of the program
concentrates on maintenance of the existing
structure as it relates to health and safety
issues and minimum housing standards. The
city of Southfield participates in the efforts
to reduce lead-based paint hazards. It does
not get involved with remodeling or
updating for cosmetic purposes, additions or
new construction projects. Typical
improvements include roofs, windows,
doors, siding, insulation, heating, electrical ,
and plumbing repairs. The program is
funded by HUD through the CDBG
program.
CHORE. The city of Southfield's CHORE
program has been helping senior adults
maintain their homes since its inception in
1983. Funded through the CDBG, CHORE
provides an annual spending account for
Housing and Residential Character 4-6

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

each income-qualified senior adult
household to be used for labor associated
with lawn care, snow removal, window and
gutter cleaning, minor plumbing, furnace
and electrical repairs.
MSHDA. The Michigan State Housing
Development Authority (MSHDA) offers
low-interest loan programs that give people
with lower incomes an opportunity to buy
their first home.
Other housing programs the City should
consider include those for larger-scale
housing rehabilitation, housing fa~ade
improvements and emergency repair grants.
As the demand for these programs increases, the City
may have an opportunity to conditionally approve
financing for those that follow more extensive
guidelines or for those willing to participate in
desired community programs. These conditions
could include implementing enhanced design
improvements (i.e. development of an attractive
second floor addition over a simple dormer addition),
use of high quality building materials (i.e. use of
cement fiberboard siding over vinyl), participation in
desired special assessment districts or spearheading
development of active community or homeowner's
associations.

Community/Neighborhood Reinvestment
Programs. Continue to work in coordination
with local lending institutions and realtors to
explore the availability and application of
neighborhood investmenUreinvestment
programs.
Neighborhood Associations. The City
encourages the creation of and coordination with
neighborhood associations and organizations,
including condominium associations. Such
organizations can coordinate with the City and
develop improvement and organizational
strategies that apply to their neighborhood, such
as a neighborhood watch program.
Neighborhood organizations can also work with
the City to set up Special Assessment Districts
(SAD) for infrastructure and streetscape
improvements such as road and sidewalk
maintenance and decorative street lighting. The
City, through the NIC and the Southfield Parks
and Garden Club, currently issues "Community
Pride Awards." Awards are granted to reward
residents, condominium associations, apartment
complexes and neighborhoods in their efforts to
maintain, improve or beautify their
neighborhood or development.
Annual Neighborhood Beautification
Programs (Clean-up Programs). A spring and

fall household hazardous waste clean up day
provides opportunities for disposal of products
that cannot be sent to the landfill. To build on
these services, the City should consider curbside
pick-up of large-scale trash, debris, and
appliances, and possibly expanding their
hazardous waste services to include collection
sites for the regular disposal of household
products such as paints, vehicular fluids and the
like.
Education Programs. Communit~ ' awareness
programs are conducted on topics such as
neighborhood blight, annual refuse collection,
and comprehensive code enforcement efforts in
and around residential neighborhoods. The
City's newsletter and Web site should continue
to provide information on existing codes and
ordinances, clean-up efforts, rehabilitation and
other housing assistance programs.
Enforcement Practices. The City should
continue to review its enforcement policies and
procedures to identify ways to improve
regulatory enforcement of and compliance with
existing laws. This review could also include an
analysis of the City's violation management
procedures and penalty (fine) structure.
Infrastructure Maintenance. A wellmaintained infrastructure is very important to
perceived neighborhood quality. Broken
sidewalks, streets with potholes and broken
curbing all portray images of neighborhood
instability, declining property values, and
negatively reflect on the community as a whole.
It is imperative that "surface infrastructure" is
regularly inspected and improved as needed.
Traffic Calming. The perception of
"neighborhood livability" is strongly influenced
by such factors as traffic volumes and speeds. A
traffic calming program could be instituted in
neighborhoods that have problems with cutthrough traffic, as described in the
Transportation Chapter.
Neighborhood Safety. Proper planning of
neighborhoods can prevent future crime. Traffic
calming, street layout and architectural
requirements can all enhance safety in a
neighborhood. More specifically, roads should
be designed to prevent cut-through traffic and
encourage lower speeds, and the layout of homes
can provide a more pedestrian environment,
encourage neighbor interaction and overall
awareness, or "eyes on the street."

Redevelopment of Outdated Housing. There are a
number of neighborhoods with small houses,
typically less than 1,000 square feet located on
smaller Jots. These homes are outdated and do not
Housing and Residential Character 4- 7

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

offer many of the amenities desired by today's home
buyers. In many areas of the City, homes can be
expanded as described in the previous section. In
those neighborhoods where the housing costs are
lower, such as neighborhoods with small
aluminum/vinyl siding homes and homes on slabs,
gradual redevelopment of the neighborhoods should
be encouraged. Any redevelopment should be
initiated by property owners and driven by the
market, with the City' s role as facilitating or assisting
the homeowners.

Home, Home on the Ranch. The 1950s style ranch
house is witnessing a resurgence, fed by nostalgia for
a simpler time. Even the historic preservation
movement, which has spent most of its energy
fighting to save century-old artifacts, now has its
sights on the preserving this vital component of our
shared heritage (social, economic and design history),
a part of the narrative of American architecture. The
City should consider working with the State Historic
Preservation Office and its program to develop a
historic resources survey for select individual ranch
houses and/or districts. The survey could identify and
document historic resources that provide character,
continuity and a sense of uniqueness to the
community, and evaluate their significance and plan
for the wise use of the community' s valuable historic
residential resources.
Multiple-Family Housing. Multiple-family housing
is provided throughout the City in a variety of forms.
The most commonly found is apartment-style
housing, characterized by larger parking lots and
buildings with few entrances. Some complexes
include a grouping of smaller multiple-family homes,
some with individual entrances. More modem
approaches to multiple-family housing include
townhomes and single-family attached and low-rise
condominiums. These are becoming more desirable
to those looking for high-quality housing with low
maintenance requirements, particularly younger
residents, retirees, or families reducing in size.
Senior Housing. Providing appropriate senior
housing options is increasingly important as the
general population ages. Fewer financial resources
are available to older residents, and so they need
affordable options that are safe, attractive and
stimulating. Many seniors live in established
neighborhoods, and some find their financial
resources strained over time, leaving them to strugole
to maintain their homes, or even worse, to heat the~.
Others live in multiple-unit complexes or in assisted
living facilities. The city of Southfield should ensure
local ordinances provide for the retention and
development of a variety of housing options,
including:

Independent living options that include ranchstyle, single-family detached or attached units
that are small in size and low in purchase price
and maintenance costs. Often these
developments offer community amenities, such
as walking trails or fitness centers, which support
the active lifestyle of early retirees.
Apartment style units are also desired for the
independence they offer, but are even more
affordable. In this setting, resident:; are often
closer to local shopping and services, which can
be especially helpful to residents with mobility
issues or those who no longer drive.
Assisted living is similar to apartment style units,
but they maintain on-site services for residents,
including medical assistance, food service,
housekeeping, recreation and sometimes even
limited retail or bank services. These
developments provide a community within itself
where residents are active, but prefer some
assistance due to health reasons or when family
members live far away.
Institutional options are also important in the
later stages of life. Most residents needing fulltime care prefer not to move far distances, as this
can cause mental stress and trauma. Allowing
residents to stay in their home community is
important when the decision is made to move to
an institutional facility.

Buffering between Residential and NonResidential Uses. Limited commercial uses in
neighborhoods can provide conveniently located
services and enhance neighborhood quality of life. It
can negatively impact neighborhoods when not
properly screened or when allowed to encroach into
the neighborhood area. Commercial and industrial
activity tends to infiltrate residential neighborhoods
in maturing communities. This can be seen along
some of Southfield's main road corridors. Some
areas, including residential areas adjacent to
commercial properties, may become ripe for
conversion to non-residential use. In some cases, this
is a reasonable change to provide greater lot size or
depth needed for certain types of modem nonresidential uses. When this type of land use change is
determined to be appropriate, the City requires site
design to limit conflicts with the adjacent neighbors
such as:
Screening with brick walls supplemented by
landscaping.
Lighting with downward directed cut-off fixtures
to prevent light from spilling onto residential
properties.

Housing and Residential Character 4-8

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Locating and screening waste receptacles and
loading areas to minimize noise impacts and
protect views from adjoining residential
properties.
Ensuring building design incorporates
architecture that enhances the quality of the
neighborhood, with mechanical equipment
properly screened and setback to not create noise
issues with nearby residential. In some cases,
the non-residential use should be designed to
have a residential appearance in terms of scale,
height, materials and overall design.

Housing and Residential Character 4-9

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

5

Economic
Development

Introduction
Southfield - because of its location, condition and
demographic composition - is uniquely positioned to
exert a positive influence on future
development/redevelopment in the metropolitan
region. Southfield is an economically viable, highly
attractive city with community values and a quality
of life second to none. The City's approach to seize
its economic development potential and to manage its
character and appearance will affect its ability to
achieve this vision.
Southfield is in an enviable position for a community
of its size. The City boasts a number of assets and a
unique character that is absent from many of
metropolitan Detroit's cities and suburbs. These
assets include a distinctive and progressive City
Centre, a successful Cornerstone Development
District, Lawrence Technological University,
Oakland Community College and other higher
educational institutions that create intelJectual capital
that extends beyond students and faculty, as welJ as
Providence Hospital, an innovative institution and the
largest employer in Southfield. In addition to a
strong employment base, quality neighborhoods with
parks, balance of jobs, services and housing,
established infrastructure, easy access to the
metropolitan Detroit region and a sense of place
creates conditions under which growth is highly
likely.

Goals
•

•

■

•

•

Business Area Competitiveness:
Increase the competitiveness of
Southfield's major business areas
(corporate office, technology sector,
retail/service centers) for high quality
business and job development.
Existing Business Competitiveness:
Increase the competitiveness of
existing Southfield businesses to grow
locally.
Economic Diversification : Diversify
and grow Southfield's economic base
in line with new global and technology
business realities.
Residential Workforce
Competitiveness: Increase
educational attainment and raise skill
levels of Southfield residents to
compete for high quality jobs of the
future.
Economic Development
Partnerships: Grow current and
develop new partnerships fostering and
accelerating economic development in
the City.
and the desire by most businesses today to
reduce operating costs and improve productivity.

Existing Trends
Southfield's demographic base has changed
dramatically, reflecting many of the trends facing
other first-tier suburbs across the country. Many
of these communities have lost ground as a result
of urban sprawl and other regional dynamics
causing them to experience the same urban
problems witnessed by larger inner cities.
The City's economic base, while still rich in
economic assets and opportunities, faces stiff
competition from newer and more nimble
regional communities. This base is restructuring
as a result of corporate mergers and acquisitions,
manufacturing and service industry outsourcing,

~ outhfield

As noted in Chapter 3 Population Trends,
Southfield's population has been in a gradual
decline since 2000 and the age of a typical
resident is increasing.
In real dollar terms (1999 dollars), Southfield's
median family income declined from $54,380 to
$52,668 between 1990 and 2000.
While Southfield residents showed some
improvement in overall educational attainment
between 1990 and 2000, there remains much
room for improvement.
Southfield's unemployment was 7.3 percent in
2005, compared to 3.7 percent in 2000. The
number of unemployed residents has increased
from 1,639 to 3,053 since 2000.

Economic Development 5-1

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

The workforce residing in Southfield has
declined from 43,971 in 2000 to 41,994 in 2005.
This drop triggered a drop in the workforce
participation rate of the City's residential
workforce from 56. l percent in 2000 to 53.7
percent in 2005.
110,412 jobs existed in the City in 2007. By
comparison, 114,216 existed in the City in 2002.
This suggests that 3.804 jobs were lost in the
City over this short time period.
Total commercial (office, retail, ervices) and
industrial real estate in the City had a total
asse sed valuation of $1.634 billion in 2006.
The City's total commercial and industrial real
estate stock included almost 41 million square
feet of space with another estimated 5 million
square feet of office scattered in sma11er
buildings. Of this total:
Office space was 53.5 percent.
Industrial space was I 0.4 percent.
Flex space was 3.7 percent (office/industrial
mix).

Retail space and shopping centers were
11.14 percent.
Unclassifiable space was 21.4 percent.
The City' office building base is aging. Since
1990, only 7.3 percent of the City's office space
was built; 8.7 percent of its industrial space; 7. I
percent of its retail space; and 12.4 percent of its
shopping center space.
As of third quarter 2006, Southfield's office
market had a 21.5 percent vacancy rate,
compared to a 19 .3 percent rate in Farmington
Hi11s, a 21.2 percent rate in Livonia, a 23.8
percent rate in ovi, and a 21 .3 percent vacancy
rate in Troy.
Southfield' office market is predominantly
located north of IO Mile Road. Eighteen million
quare feet of this space is located north of IO
Mile Road and 5.8 million outh of 10 Mile
Road.
Almost all (99 percent) of Southfield's class A
office space is located north of 10 Mile Road.
About three quarters of the City class B office
space is located north of IO Mile Road.
Meanwhile, 60 percent of the City class C office
space is located south of 10 Mile Road.

~o_uJhfielcJ_

Lessons from Other First Tier
Suburbs
The experiences of other first tier suburbs were
examined as guidance for this Plan. Some general
lessons from that examination are:

You Can't Do It Alone. Cooperation with other
first tier suburbs and the core city in the region is
important to finding effective solution to larger
regional issues such as sprawl and inefficient
growth.
A State Policy Shift is Vital. State support i
vital to improving conditions in the first tier
suburbs. Convincing the state to invest in
existing communities and redevelopment over
new communities and new development is
imperative. First-tier suburbs should develop a
shared policy agenda to gamer state support.
Businesses and Developers must be ReEducated. Financial incentives are needed to
interest businesses and private developers in
investing in first-tier communities rather than
developing greenfields in outlying locations.
Community-Building is Essential. It is not
enough to just increase public and private
investment in first tier suburbs. Community
leaders must work on community-building in a
holistic sense that looks at economic
development, housing, infrastructure, land use
and zoning, and the many other issues being
considered in the Southfield Comprehensive
Master Plan.
Quality Coupled with Affordable. This
appears to be the mantra of many first tier
suburbs that are making the "value proposition"
that quality development/redevelopment must be
encouraged, but affordability must be considered
in meeting the need of their re idential base.
Stepped Up Economic Development. First-tier
communities have increased their assistance to
existing busines es, entrepreneurship and new
business attraction. A key beginning that must be
met is being able to offer busine ses quality
building and ites for use. Brownfield cleanup
has received significant attention, coupled with
more infill development projects.
Better Public Transportation. Public
transportation is seen as essential to workers,
tudents and the elderly living in first-tier
communities. Working to make tran it services
more acce sible, responsive and safe is
important.

Economic Development 5-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Become a Go-To Place: Many first tier
communities have increased their attractiveness
as destinations such as specialty shopping, fine
dining, and entertainment for local and regional
residents.
Capture Daytime Worker Dollars. This is a
lesson for Southfield since the City has many
daytime workers who leave the City after work.
Meeting these workers' shopping and
entertainment needs is important.
People Retention and Recruitment. First tier
suburbs are working more aggressively at
retaining their existing population base and
attracting new residents. Having desirable
housing, shopping and entertainment amenities is
essential to achieving this objective.
Reward and Recognize. It is important to
continue to visibly recognize and reward private
developers, institutions (e.g., hospitals,
education), businesses, neighborhoods, and
individual residents helping to bring back the
social and economic life in the community.
First Suburbs Examined: Lakewood, Shaker
Heights, Beachwood, and Cleveland Heights (Greater
Cleveland area, Ohio); Upper Arlington, Grandview
Heights, and Worthington (Columbus area, Orio);
Kettering and Oakwood (Dayton area, Ohio);
Farmington Hills, Lincoln Park and Warren (Detroit
area, Michigan); Overland Park, Kansas and
Independence, Missouri (Kansas City area).

Top Economic Development
Challenges
Five economic development challenges grew from
the analysis of the City's economic profile and
opportunities. Because of their importance, a goal
and recommendations/strategies have been identified
for each challenge. Southfield's top economic
development challenges are:
l.

Strengthen the competitiveness of the City's
existing major business areas (office,
industrial/technology and commercial) to bring
about new development in these areas.

2.

Help existing Southfield business employers
become more competitive, enabling them to
expand and grow in the City.

3.

Encourage and assist with the future
diversification of the City's economic base in

new growing and innovative industries and
occupations.
4.

Help Southfield residents gain a greater
competitive edge for higher skilled and higher
wage employment opportunities in the future.

5.

Leverage greater leadership involvement, private
and public sector investment and increased
access to high quality business and job
development opportunities for the City in the
future.

Current Conditions
This existing economic development conditions
profile of the city of Southfield is intended to
highlight the key economic development and
business issues facing the community. It provides the
analytic foundation for the strategy part of the
economic development element of the
Comprehensive Plan. Overall, the information
presented in this profile identifies many of the
changes that have taken place in the city of
Southfield over the last 10-15 years. This profile is
presented both in relation to the larger political
di visions in the area, as well as, in comparison to
some of the neighboring communities and region.
When comparing information for the City of
Southfield to larger political divisions, comparisons
are made to Oakland County and to Southeast
Michigan (see Figure 5-1). For the purposes of this
analysis, the definition of Southeast Michigan is
based on that used by Southeast Michigan Council of
Government (SEMCOG) and includes the counties of
Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair,
1
Washtenaw, and Wayne •

Demographic Changes
Population and Households. Demographic factors
and trends are significant influences upon the growth
1
This definition differs slightly from the definition of Metropolitan
Statistical Areas used by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. As
defined in 2003, the Detroit - Warren - Livonia Metropolitan
Statistical Area (MSA) includes two Metropolitan Divisions:
Detroit - Livonia - Dearborn Metropolitan Division (Wayne
County) and Warren - Farmington Hills - Troy Metropolitan
Division (Lapeer, Livingston, Macomb, Oakland, and St. Clair
counties). Prior to 2003, the cities of Ann Arbor (Washtenaw
County) and Flint (Genesee County) were also included in the
Detroit Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA).
These cities, and their respective counties, are currently defined as
being their own Metropolitan Statistical Areas.

Economic Development 5-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Income and Poverty. Comparing household
incomes in 1990 to those in 2000, it appears that
household incomes in the City of Southfield
increased; however, the use of income categories
over time is deceptive because it is difficult to
identify the effects that inflation has on households'
real income. Refer to Chapter 3 Population Trends,
for a more detailed analysis.

of Southfield's economic base. Between 1990 and
2000, the City of Southfield grew in terms of
population and households. This growth, however,
trailed the growth in Oakland County and Southeast
Michigan as a whole, see Chapter 3 Population
Trends, for additional analysis.
Slow growth in the number of households in the City
is important from an economic development
standpoint because households are consuming units
that support the local economy.
F.12ure 5 -1: Populat10n Chan2e: Southeast MI Cities, 2000-2006
Rank
2006

Community

Estimated
Population
2006

Change in
Population
2000-2006

Rank
2000

1

Detroit

868,822

-82,448

l

2

Warren

135,339

-2,908

2

3

Sterlin,g Heights

127,623

3,152

3

4

Ann Arbor

112,530

-1,494

4

5

Dearborn

99,909

2,134

6

6

Livonia

96,531

-4,014

5

7

Clinton Twp

96,144

496

7

8

Canton Twp

85,462

9,096

12

Westland

83,605

-2,997

8

Troy

81,290

331

10

9
10
11

Farmington Hills

80,486

-1,625

9

12

Southfield
Macomb Twp

78,009

-313

11

72,824

22,346

Waterford Twp

70,792

-1, 189

23
13
17
14
15

13
14
15

Shelby Twp

71,997

6,838

16

Rochester Hills

69,405

580

17

68,112

606

18

Pontiac
West Bloomfield
Twp

65,789

929

18

19

Taylor

64,127

-1,741

16

20

St Clair Shores

60,760

-2,336

19

Although redefining the income categories for
household income does not, by itself, definitively
show decline in resident incomes, it is consistent with
other data that show the decline in income and
increasing poverty. Data in Figure 5-2 shows that, in
'real' terms (incomes adjusted for inflation), incomes
are declining and poverty is increasing within the
City.

Labor Force
While Southfield saw a small growth in its residential
labor force during 1990-2000, the City experienced a
sharp drop of almost 2,000 workers between 2000
and 2005.
The number of residents employed in the City
declined during the 2000-2005-period. One
explanation of this decline in workforce is the
migration of employed workers to other locations.
Employment dislocations are a likely explanation for
the decline in the number of employed residents over
the past five years. A closer examination of local
employer cutbacks and relocations is needed to
pinpoint the cause of these trends. See Figure 5-3.

Between 1990 and 2000, the percent of the
population in the City of Southfield between the ages
of 18 to 34 declined by 3 percent while those ages
35-64 increased by 4 percent. Though Southfield has
a significant concentration of Baby Boomers, the
City does not appear to be retaining its Mini
Boomers. This is an important future economic issue
for the City. According to research by the Brookings
Institute and other research groups, the failure to
capture the Mini Boomers generation is characteristic
of many "inner ring suburbs."

Southfield_

Economic Development 5-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

A second important dimension of the local labor
force is the participation rate of those people
available to work. Figure 5-4 provides data on these
trends between 2000 and 2005. This data indicates
that the labor force participation rate declined for
Southfield, Oakland County and southeast Michigan .
Southfield' s labor force participation rate decline was
much more severe than Southeast Michigan and
about the same as Oakland County.

Figure 5-2: Southfield "Real" Income and
p overty p·1cture

This decline in the City' s labor force participation
rate could be attributed to three possible
explanations.
•
The demand for labor, or the specific types of
labor skills in Southfield, has declined.
•
Southfield residents that have Jost jobs have been
unable to find replacement jobs.
•
Workers are exiting the workforce due to their
age and contributing to a lower participation rate.

Income Category
Median Household
Income ( 1999 Dollars)
Households in Poverty

1990

2000

$54,380

$52,468

1,982 (6%)

2,570 (8%)

Persons in Poverty

4,371 (6%)

5,721 (7%)

1gure 5-3 : Lb
a or Force Tren ds, 1990-2006
Community

1990

2005

2000

City of Southfield

Labor Force

43,405

43,971

41 ,994

Employment

40,495

42,332

38,941

2,910

1,639

3,053

6.7

3.7

7.3

Unemployment
Jobless Rate
Oakland County

Labor Force
Employment

Industry Trends

Unemployment

The growth performance of local industries
comprising the City ' s economic base is an important
driver for local economic development.

Jobless Rate
Labor Force
Employment
Unemployment
Jobless Rate

•

•
•
•

•

639,985

656,338
19,446

603,762

6. 1

2.9

5.7

2,304,693

2,501 ,294

2,420,189

2, 124, 125

2,411 ,983

2,251 ,959

180,568

89,311

168,230

7.8

3.6

7.0

36,223

Figure 5-4: Labor Force partic1patlon T ren ds 1990-2005
'
1990
2000
2005
Community
City of Southfield

Figure 5-5 describes employment changes in the city
of Southfield's major industries between 1997 and
2002. Data in Table 5-5 describes changes in the
major industries located in Southfield. Some
highlights:
Manufacturing declined in the City by 18.6
percent; a loss of 847 jobs.
Wholesale trade declined by nearly 36 percent; a
loss of 2,457 jobs.
Retail trade declined by 16.5 percent; a loss of
1,476 jobs.
Real estate declined by 7 .3 percent; a loss of 220
jobs.
Accommodations and food services declined by
3.6% percent; a loss of 170 jobs.
Educational services declined by 24.5 percent; a
loss of 146 jobs.

675,784

Southeast Michigan

The data in Figures 5-5 , 5-6 and 5-7 (pg. 5-7) come
from the U.S. Economic Censuses of 1997 and 2002.
It is important to note that this data only brings us to
2002, and a great deal has changed in the regional
and local economies since then. Unfortunatel y, local
area industry and employment data is very limited in
availability.

•

604,989
567,932
37,057

Total Population

75 ,745

78,3 22

78,272

Labor Force

43,405

43,971

41 ,994

Participation Rate

57 .3%

56.1%

53.7 %

1,083,592

1,194,156

1,218,573

604,989

675 ,784

639,985

55 .8%

56.6%

52.5%

Total Population

4,590,468

4,833,368

4,908,997

Labor Force

2,304,693

2,501 ,294

2,420,189

50.2%

51.8%

49.3%

Oakland County

Total Population
Labor Force
Participation Rate
Southeast Michigan

Participation Rate

•
•

Administration of waste management and
remediation services grew by 52 percent; a gain
of 7,900 jobs.
Healthcare and social assistance grew by 84
percent; a gain of 6,981 jobs.

Economic Development 5-5

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•
•
•

Arts, entertainment and recreation grew by 36.6
percent; a gain of 207 jobs.
Other services grew in the City by 11.2 percent;
a gain of 175 jobs.
No data was released for the Information sector,
which is unfortunate because this sector is an
important one for the City, especially IT-related
businesses and jobs.

~9_!.-tthfield

Economic Development 5-6

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

. Base Ch anges, 1997-2002
Fhrure 5-5: Citv of Southfiel dEconormc
Employment by Industry, City of Southfield: 1997-2002
NAICS
31-33
42
44-45
51
53
54
56
61
62
71
72
81

Description
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Retai I trade
Information
Real estate &amp; rental &amp; leasing
Professional , scientific, &amp; technical services
Admin, Support, Waste Mgmt &amp; Remediation Services
Educational services
Health care &amp; social assistance
Arts, entertainment, &amp; recreation
Accommodation &amp; food services
Other services (except public administration)

Number of Emplovees
1997
2002
4,564
6,838
8,925

3,717
4,381
7,449

Change 1997-2002
Percent
Number
(847)
(2,457)
(1,476)

-18.6%
-35.9%
-16.5%

NA

NA

NA

NA

3,001
13,035
15,152
595
8,302
566
4,739
1,565

2,781

(220)

-7.3%

NA

NA

NA

23,053
449
15,283
773
4,569
1,740

7,901
(146)
6,981
207
(170)
175

52.1%
-24.5%
84.1%
36.6%
-3.6%
11.2%

. Base Changes, 1997-2002
umre 560kJ
- : a andC ountv Econormc
Employment by Industry, OakJand County: 1997-2002
NAICS
31-33
42
44-45
51
53
54
56
61
62
71
72
81

Description
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Information
Real estate &amp; rental &amp; leasing
Professional, scientific, &amp; technical services
Admin, Support, Waste Mgmt &amp; Remed Serv
Educational services
Health care &amp; social assistance
Arts, entertainment, &amp; recreation
Accommodation &amp; food services
Other services (except public administration)

Number of Emolovees
2002
1997
90,481
45,311
83,826

79,167
42,709
80,791

Change 1997-2002
Number
Percent
(11,314)
(2,602)
(3,035)

-12.5%
-5.7%
-3.6%

NA

NA

NA

NA

14,568
60,999
88,516
2,464
35,580
6,948
48,174
16,274

16,161
93,633
81,549
3,445
84,553
9,712
49,848
20,942

1,593
32,634
(6,967)
981
48,973
2,764
1,674
4,668

10.9%
53.5%
-7.9%
39.8%
137.6%
39.8%
3.5%
28.7%

F"urnre 5-7 : SEM"IChill!an Econorrnc Base Changes, 1997-2002
Employment by Industry, Southeast Michigan: 1997-2002
NAICS
31-33
42
44-45
51
53
54
56
61
62
71
72
81

Description
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Information
Real estate &amp; rental &amp; leasing
Professional, scientific, &amp; technical services
Admin, Support, Waste Mgmt &amp; Remed Serv
Educational services
Health care &amp; social assistance
Arts, entertainment, &amp; recreation
Accommodation &amp; food services
Other services (except public administration)

Number of Employees
2002
1997
380,989
107,361
254,616

339,391
98,924
248,940

Change 1997-2002
Number
Percent
(41,598)
(8,437)
(5,676)

-10.9%
-7.9%
-2.2%

NA

NA

NA

NA

29,948
113,457
169,739

33,179

3,231

10.8%

NA

NA

NA

168,995

(744)

-0.4%

NA

NA

NA

NA

98,163
17,717
155,542
51,201

254,431
36,106
160,701
59,349

156,268
18,389
5,159
8,148

159.2%
103.8%
3.3%
15.9%

Economic Development 5-7

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Data in Figure 5-8 suggests that 110,412 total jobs
exist in the City at the present time. By comparison,
114,216 jobs were in the City in 2002, according
SEMCOG estimates using the ES-202 data. This
suggests that Southfield lost over 3,800 jobs during
the last three years. The information also indicates
Southfield had 5,443 Information sector jobs, which
is a growing industry sector nationally.

F'1gure 5-8 : Southfi1eId Econormc
'B ase, 2005
Sector
Agriculture, Forestry,
Fishing, &amp; Hunting

Finance and Insurance
Healthcare and Social Services
Professional and Technical Services

■

Figure 5-9: Southfield 2005 Employment, Industry Shares
Southfield 2005 Total Employment: 110,412:

n/a
0

Utilities

n/a

Manufacturing

3,532

Wholesale Trade

7,351

Retail Trade
Transportation &amp;
Warehousing

8,619

Information

5,443

Educational Services
Health Care and Social
Assistance
Arts, Entertainment,&amp;
Recreation
Accommodation and Food
Services
Other Services (except
Public Admin)

■

•

Employment

Mining

Finance &amp; Insurance
Real Estate &amp; Rental &amp;
Leasing
Professional, Scientific, &amp;
Technical Services
Management of Companies
&amp; Enterprises
Administrative &amp; Support
&amp; Waste Mgmt &amp;
Remediation Services

Figure 5-9 shows the percentage shares that major
industries hold in the City's economic base. The
City's three largest industries, based upon Figure 5-9
data are:

Public Administration

1%
Other Services ( except
Public Ad min)

2%
Accommodation and

8%

983

7%
Retail Trade

Arts , Entertainrrent , and
Recreation

8%
Transportat ion &amp;

1%

Warehousing

18,285
3,402

Manufacturing Wholesale Trade

3%

Food Services

1%

Health Care and Social
Assistance

Information

17%

5%

16,484
2,669

Edu::ational Services

Finance &amp; Insurance

5%

17%

Administrative &amp; Support

6,052
5,316
18,644

&amp;WasteMgmt&amp;
Remediation Services
Real Estate and Rental

5%

and Leasing
3%

M anag ement of
Companies &amp; Enterprises

2%

910

Professional, Scientific, &amp;
Techncal Services

8,719

15%

2,369

Public Administration

1,618
Total
110,412
n/a - Data blocked for confidentiality
Source: SEMCOG, Michigan ES-202 Data

-

Southfield
--.

--,.'---

Economic Development 5-8

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Economic Development Framework
Economic development is a vitally important priority
in Southfield ' s new Comprehensive Master Plan. A
healthy, high quality and growing economic base is
the foundation for effective community building in
the City. Unless the economic life of Southfield is
strengthened, the City' s vision for a more vibrant,
diverse and successful community will be
undermined.

and business travel accommodations also make
Southfield an ideal location for conventions,
conferences and business meetings.

•

Weak Regional Economy: The economic basis
for much of greater Detroit and southeast
Michigan have exhibited a pattern of slow
economic, market, business and job growth over
the past two decades or more. In large part, this
slow growth pattern is caused by tht~
longstanding concentration of slowly growing or
declining manufacturing industries; most of
which still depend heavily on the automotive
marketplace. Regional economic development
efforts have expanded, and according to the
latest annual report of the Economic
Development Coalition of Southeast Michigan
some progress is being made. In 2007 , the
Coalition helped 177 economic development
projects create just over 16,000 new jobs and $4
billion in new business investment across the
region . Another 9,500 existing jobs were
retained through assistance by the Coalition.

•

First-Tier Suburb Characteristics: The
economic and social chailenges facing Southfield
are not unfamiliar to America' s other first-tier
suburbs, like Beachwood, Cleveland Heights,
Shaker Heights, and Lakewood in the Greater
Cleveland area. In short, first-tier communities
have witnessed many of the same economic and
social problems besetting the large central cities
on which they border.

•

Limited Land for Development: A central issue
for Southfield, as well as most first-tier suburbs,
is a very limited supply of available and
developable land for future residential,
commercial , office and industrial development.
While the City has made considerable efforts in
the past to clean-up and recycle its available land
supply, much greater attention must be given to
this issue, as the plan recommends in Chapter 6
Managing Land Use for the Future. It will be
especially important for Southfield to continue
planning, improving and developing incentives
to existing business areas, such as City Centre,
Cornerstone Development Authority District,
Northwestern Highway Corridor area, Central
Business Park, Bridge Street/Southfield
Commerce Center, and American Commerce
Centre.

•

Slipping Community Educational Attainment:
For years, Southfield ' s schools were seen as
being among the best in the region. While still

Southfield stands at an economic crossroads. If the
City' s economic base remains on its current slow
growth trajectory, business and employment
opportunities for residents and the City as a whole
will diminish. Southfield will lose stature as a
community of choice for resident, office and retail
trade development. On the other hand, armed with a
strong economic development game plan as part of
its new Comprehensive Master Plan, Southfield will
be better prepared to weather the economic storm that
ravaged both Southeast Michigan and Michigan ' s
economies.
At present, Southfield still has a chance to give shape
to a better economic future for the community and its
businesses and residents, but time is running out.
The City and its public and private sector economic
development partners must work harder and smarter
in retaining and expanding existing businesses and
jobs, recruiting new job-creating businesses to the
City, and accelerating entrepreneurship in new and
diverse industry sectors. Examples of these sectors
are advanced automation, nanotechnology, advanced
medical services, information technology services
aimed at established and emerging industries,
professional and technical services, and specialty
retail trade.

Strategic Economic Development Trends
The City economic base is currently dominated by
the following strategic trends:

•

Strategic Location: Southfield continues to
offer a highly strategic location for businesses
and employment within the region. This is an
economic development advantage that will
continue to work for Southfield for some time in
the future. Southfield's central location provides
easy access to numerous metro-area arterials
freeways and air transportation. Southfield';
central location places it just 20 minutes away
from almost every major greater Detroit area
destination. The City ' s extensive hotel industry

Southfield

-7"-

--.~

Economic Development 5-9

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

good in many respects, there has been some
slippage in educational outcomes as shifting
demographics and other issues have created
added pressures for the schools. Southfield must
keep its schools strong to ensure that an educated
residential workforce exists for the future.
Southfield educators must ensure that their
graduates possess the essential math, science,
writing, reasoning, creative and social skills
demanded by employers today. A number of
school-business partnerships exist now in the
community. These must be maintained, and new
ones developed, especially in fast growth career
areas like advanced healthcare services,
information technology and communications,
and business entrepreneurship.
■

■

■

Aging Business Real Estate: The City's office
building base is aging. Since 1990, only 7 .3
percent of the City's office space was built; 8. 7
percent of its industrial space; 7 .1 percent of its
retail space; and 12.4 percent of its shopping
center space. These numbers suggest property
owners, tenants and the City will need to work
closely in the future in improving existing retail,
office, and technology/light industrial space, and
build new space where existing will not meet
future market needs.

■

Weak Retail Sector, Not Aligned to
Community Needs in Places: Interviews and

Victim of Corporate Restructuring: Many of
the business and job losses in Southfield, as well
as the surrounding region, have been triggered
by corporate restructuring and downsizing and
the globalization of the area's once strong
manufacturing industries. Fortunately, the City
continues to boast a strong corporate base that
includes employers like Lear Corporation (world
headquarters), Denso International (North
American headquarters), BASF, GE, Honda
Research and Development America, Eaton
Corporation, Sverdrup Technologies, Panasonic
Automotive Electronics, Autoliv Electronics,
AT&amp;T, Verizon, Sprint, Comcast, IBM,
Microsoft, UGS Corporation, Sun Microsystems,
and Cisco Systems. Creating a competitive
environment for their future growth is a major
priority of this plan.

■

office space within the City, Southfield is the
home of a large number of corporate and
entrepreneurial business office users. Some
examples of these companies were listed earlier.
The City's office base is its leading economic
sector, which makes an important economic
contribution directly and indirectly through the
jobs and payroll it creates and the taxes it
contributes. While some of the City's major
office users face major business challenges, most
remain strong.

Stiff Business/Job Competition: Nearly all
Southeast Michigan communities have bolstered
their economic development efforts for business
retention and expansion, recruitment, and
entrepreneurial development. Southfield has an
effective economic development effort, but this
effort must be expanded in the future to help
more businesses, entrepreneurs and job-seekers.
A review of economic development efforts in
surrounding communities, like Troy, Livonia,
Farmington Hills, West Bloomfield, and Novi
indicates these communities will give increased
attention to developing new office, technology,
and retail businesses and jobs. Many of these
communities, especially those to the west, are
better equipped with available land for future
development.
Still Strong Office Sector, Despite Some
Losses: With over 26 million square feet of

(20Uthfi_e ld

public meetings point to the need for some
realignment and expansion of the City's retail
trade base. City residents and employees
working in the City point to the need for a wider
variety of retail shopping services, including
more restaurants, especially higher quality and
mid-priced establishments, specialty clothing
shops, home furnishing, food and grocery stores,
and fitness and wellness related services.
Currently, 11-12 percent of the City's business
real estate base is retail in nature. Much of this
space is located in smaller older shopping strips
along the City's major transportation corridors.
The future of Northland Mall is a major issue,
hopefully an opportunity to strengthen the
variety and quality of this retail and consumer
services center will become available to residents
of the City and region.
■

Neutral to Weakening Economic Image: A
positive community image is an important
ingredient for economic development.
Southfield must give greater attention to building
and communicating its business image. At one
time, Southfield was well recognized both
regionally and nationally as a major thriving
office service center. According to interviews
and meetings with local and regional business
leaders, this image has weakened in some ways
as the community has seen a slowing of its

Economic Development 5-10

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

business and residential growth. Southfield is
seen as a central place for business, but it is not
clear what differentiates Southfield from other
community locations in Southeast Michigan. The
City's transportation access advantages seem
clear enough, but what is less clear is that the
City can meet the real estate space needs of
employers and that Southfield will not fall prey
to the serious social and economic problems
besetting other communities in the metro region.
An important aspect of Southfield's future
business image must be that it can offer quality
coupled with affordability.

•

•

•

Industrial Sector, Very Small and Growing
Slowly: Unlike some of its neighboring
communities, Southfield's economic base has
never been dominated by manufacturing. Instead,
Southfield has relied heavily on its office base as
an economic catalyst. It is very unlikely that the
City will grow its manufacturing base to any
great extent in the future because of the sharp
decline in the region's industrial sector and the
fact that other Southeast Michigan communities
have established themselves already as
manufacturing centers. Instead, Southfield's
future, beyond office, is technology business
related. The City is already off to a good start as
a technology center with more than 350 hightechnology, information-technology, and
telecommunications firms in Southfield.
Need for Greater Business &amp; Industry
Diversity: It is clear that increased industry
diversification will be important to Southfield's
future economic stability. In particular,
additional technology sector, entrepreneurial
office, research and development and specialty
retail businesses will be important to the City
attaining its overall economic development
goals. While retaining existing corporate office
users is vitally important, greater attention must
be given to increasing the number and variety of
new entrepreneurial businesses. Economic
development research by the Kauffman
Foundation in Kansas City points to the fact that
entrepreneurial businesses that are owned by
local residents tend to remain longer in a
community than many other types of businesses,
such as branches of large office and
manufacturing companies.
Not Capitalizing Fully on Daytime Worker
Dollar: This is a reality for Southfield and many
other communities with large daytime
populations. Southfield's daytime population is

close to 175,000, which points to a large market
for desired retail trade and consumer services
that currently do not exist in the community.
Major office property owners in the community
indicate their willingness to work with the City
in increasing these types of opportunities. These
services must be of the right type and they must
be located within an easy walk of the City's
major office districts.

•

Entrepreneurial Sector Weakening: Interviews
with local business leaders indicate that the
City's entrepreneurial sector is weakening as
longstanding locally-owned businesses grow
older. While the City has seen some new
business starts, it does not appear that these
births are growing fast enough. First-tier
suburbs like Beachwood, Ohio (located in the
Greater Cleveland area) has seen the same trend
and is working to combat this by growing new
technology related businesses built by local and
out of town entrepreneurs. Beachwood is giving
major attention to the attraction of Israeli
technology startups. The City's large Jewish
population is a magnet helping to attract these
businesses. Nearly 20 of these startups have
landed in the City over the past 4-5 years.

Recommendations
Taking these important trends i~to account, all signs
point to the need for an expanded economic
development effort by the City in the future. As
discussed in Chapter 2 (Governing Principles, Goals
and Recommendations), a multi-faceted action
strategy must be adopted by the City. While direct
economic development services must be increased,
equal attention must be given to sparking economic
development through land use, transportation, and
housing.
Southfield must approach economic development in
the future through a more integrated strategy that
links planning, zoning, transportation and other City
services. In addition, the City must continue to work
on strengthening its local business and community
partnerships while building even stronger external
partnerships with Oakland County, the State of
Michigan, various regional economic development
groups, and various business associations.
The Comprehensive Master Plan can be a powerful
tool preparing the City and its partners to strengthen
economic development across the City. As a starting

Economic Development 5-11

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

point, the top three economic development goals that
should receive the greatest attention:
1.
2.
3.

Strengthen the City's major business areas.
Help Southfield employers become more
competitive.
Encourage and assist with local economic
diversification.

The specific strategies to achieve these goals are
identified in Chapter 2. Actions focused on these
goals will ensure that Southfield positions itself for
not only better immediate economic development
opportunities, but longer term initiatives that will
foster sufficient job growth, capital investment and
revenue generation. These top three goals wilJ
provide the City with a stronger foundation for future
growth, which is most important.

~uthfielq_

Economic Development 5-12

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

6

Managing Land
Use for the Future

Goals
• Create a diversified and balanced
mixture of land uses that will support the
economic vitality, tax base and livability
of the City.
• Offer unified , well-organized residential
neighborhoods that provide a traditional ,
livable environment for the City's
residents.
• Provide for an appropriate amount of
commercial , office, and industrial uses,
located for convenience and safety,
resulting in aesthetic business areas in
the City.
.

Land Use Characteristics
Southfield is an urban city that is predominantly
developed. In 2005, approximately 4 percent of land
in Southfield was undeveloped. Therefore, new
development can be expected to occur slowly, with
most new development expected to be in the form of
redevelopment and infill. Between 1990 and 2000,
the City's residential density increased slightly,
indicating that new development is occurring at a
somewhat higher intensity than in previous stages of
Southfield's development.

Existing Land Use
Table 6-1: Southfield Land Use, 2005

The collection and analysis of existing land use
represents one of the most important steps in the
Comprehensive Plan update process. The analysis
of such information not only identifies what and
where particular uses exist, but also provides insight
as to where future development might occur, as well
as where land use conflicts exist or may develop.
Land use planning is the primary tool communities
use to correct or avoid land use conflicts and to
create sustainable and supportive land use
arrangements.
Land use conflicts occur when incompatible uses
are located adjacent to one another, with various
negative short- and long-term impacts. In time,
these nuisances can lead to depreciation of both
affected properties. Conversely, opportunities for
future development that might greatly benefit the
general health and welfare of a community can also
be identified as part of the same process. Land uses
that may be conflicting in proximity may be assets
when arranged appropriately. Industrial operations
and single-family neighborhoods are a good
example of uses that can cause tremendous conflict
when located in close proximity but can serve as
tremendous assets to a community when located
properly.

Land Use Acres
Agriculture
Single-Family Residential
Large Lot
Medium lot
Small Lot/Attached
Multiple-Family Residential
Low Rise
Mid/High Rise
Mobile Home Park
Commercial/Office
Community Commercial
Regional Commercial
Office
Industrial
Light Industrial
Public/Institutional
Recreation/Conservation
Transport/Utility/Comm.
Extractive
Vacant
Water
Right-of-Way
Total

Southfield
%
#
0%
0
40%
6,746
3,465
2,575
706

21%
15%
4%

1,300

8%
7%
1%
0%
12%
3%
3%
6%
2%
1%
8%
5%
1%
0%
4%
0.6%
18%

1,099
200

2,010
560
430
1,020
350
129
1,409
783
231

729
106
3,027
16,819

-

Oakland Co.
#
%
20,359
4%
227,839
39%

13,031

2%

3,520
18,464

1%
3%

17,945

3%

19,683
78,801
6,285
6,091
74,475
35,035
59,018
580,543

3%
14%
1%
1%
13%
6%
10%

Source: Oakland County Land Use Program, LSL Planning, Inc.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-1

-

�Map 6-1: Existing Land Use
Southfield Comprehensive Plan

Legend
Land Use
Residential
Single Family (&gt;20,000 sqft)

II

Single Family (9,000-20,000 sqft)
Single Family (&lt;7,500 sqft)

II

Lathrup
Village

Multiple Family (Low Rise)
Multiple Family (MidiHigh Rise)

Commercial/Office
Office

II

Local/Community Commercial
Regional Commercial

Civic

II
II

Public/Institutional
Recreation/Conservation
Road Right-of-Way

Other

II

Industrial
Light Industrial

•

Transportation/Utilrty/Communication
Water

~

o

Vacant

0.5

lllll:::J• :=: 1---0.25

Miles

0

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

A~ seen in Table 6-1. single-family residential homes
comprised the largest portion or land uses in
Southfield in 200.S (-W percent). followed by rightsof-way ( 18 percent), commercial and office uses ( 12
percent). multiple-family uses (8 percent) , and
public/institutional uses (8 percent) . By comparison,
Oakland County was approximately 17 percent
undeveloped when com,idering vacant and
agricultural lands. ln the County. l:&gt;ingle-family
resi&lt;lences comprised approximately 39 percent of
the land area, followed by recreation and
conservation lands ( 1-1- percent). vacant lands ( 13
percent). and rights-of-way (IO percent). Among the
most significant differences in land uses hctween
Southfield and Oakland County arc the higher
concentration or commercial and office u~cs.
transportation rights-of-way, and multiple-family
resiliences and the lower concentration of recreation
and conservation lands in Southfield. Map 6- l shows
the distribution of lan&lt;l uses in Southfiek.l in 1005 .
Tabk 6-2 provides definitions of the land use

categories used in the map and throughout this
Chapter.

Agriculture. Agriculture has not hem a significant
land use in Southfield in recent decades. Oakland
County historical land use data indicates that only -+
acres of Southfield was devoted to agricultural uses
in 1966. By 2005. those agricultural lands had
disappeared.

Single-Family Residential. Single-family residences
make up the largest land use in Southfield by a large
margin, covering more than twice as many acres as
the second largest category. Single-family homes arc
fairly evenly distributed thrnughout the community
except in the areas northwest or town and along the
major thoroughfares where relatively fow singlefamily homes exist.
Most ::.ingk-family home~ were constructed in the
I %Os and 1970s. These structures have generally

Table 6-2: Existing Land Use Categories
Agriculture: Land used as cultivated farm land. orchards. or for livestock activity. with or without related farn1 structures.
Single-Family: Parceb having three or fewer unit per building in predominately residential use .
Large Lot: Single-family residences on parcels larger than 20.000 square feet.
Medium Lot: SingJc-family residences on parcels between 9.000 and 20.000 square feel.
SmalJ Lot/Attached: Single-family residences on parcels smaller than 9.000 square feet.
Multiple-Family: Parcels having four or more units per building in predominately re idcntial use. incluJing apartments.
condominiums. row houses, and ten-aces plus any associated streets, service drives. and community area such as yards.
clubhouses. anJ pool . Hotels. motcb. campgrounds. and mohile home parks are excluded from this category.
Low Rise: Multiple-family structures three stories tall or le~s.
Mid/High Rise: Multiple-family structures taller than three ~tories.
Commercial/Office: Parcels used for wholesale, retail. office, entertainment, or services, including tho~e uses
predominately at street level on multi-functional structure~. plus related contigu )US acce sory uses uc.:h as parking areas and
service drive~ .
Local/Community Commercial: Parcels with commercial useq not including offices. which primarily serve the
local community.

Regional Commercial: Parcel - with commercial uses. not including offices. which draw significant user from
heyond Southfield.
Office: Parcels used prirnarjly for office!:&gt;. including office tower&lt;;. ortice parks. and indi ·idual office building.·.
Industrial: Land used predominately for manufacturing or on which matenaJs or article, arc processed or semi-proce scd,
hut not retailed, including associated , torage areas, and warehousing. Commercial waste disposal sites. land fill operations,
and junk yards are also shown as industrial.

Light Industrial: Land used predominantly for wholesale activities. warehouses. and low-intensity industrial operations
that have no impact on neighboring parcel · or di tricts. Examples or uses in thi category are warehou es. electronics
assembly, small manufacturers, materials packaging, and research laboratories
Public/Institutional: Parceb and facilitie~ that are held in the public interest and are usually exempt from real property
Laxation plus any s-:rvice drive~ or roads m:-.idc the acLUal parccJ. Examples of this category are churches. educational
facilities. governmental nlTiccc;;. hospitals, municipal parking facilities. day care centers, and cemeteries.

$.QuthfielQ.

Managing Land Use for th e Future 6-2

�-

-,---------------Map 6-2: Future Land Use
'

t

t •

Southfield Comprehensive Plan

---rar

1

1n

Low-Density Single-Family
Single-family homes on lots 20,000 sq. ft. or large r. permits
complimentary small scale institutional uses.

Moderate-Dens ity S ing le-Fam ily
Single-family homes on lots less than 20,000 sq. ft., permits
complimentary small scofe institutional uses.

Low-Density Multiple-Family
Townhouses &amp; multiple-family units, generally under 2 stories.

Moderate-Density Multiple-Family
Multiple-family units over two stories.

Local Mixed-Use

r.. 0 E ,

C'_ity"

of

Primarily business in nature, mixture of neighborhood commercial
service and office with accessory multiple-family uses.
'

Lathrup Village

Regional Mixed-Use
Primarily business in nature, mixture of large scale commercial,
service and office with accessory multiple-family uses.

Office/Research
Corporate and medical offices, research facilities
television stations.
'
J;

Medical/Educational Institutions

.r

Hospital and college campuses.

C

::,

Light Industrial

O'

Wholesale, warehouse and industrial operations with minimal
external impacts.

c~,;;-

E
m

i
l

r
Industrial
0
i'

Wholesale , warehouse and industrial operations.

Public Parks and Recreation
City owned or operated recreation facilities and open space.

Private Parks and Recreation
Privately owned or operated recreation facilities and open space.

--

~
0

Technology Corridor Subarea
Concentrated corridor consisting of high -tech office and research ,
with some support commercial interspersed.

City Centre Subarea
Mixed-use area that serves as the community meeting place or
heart of Southfield.

North Southfield Road Subarea
Unique area that contains a mixture of multi-cultural retail and
services.

Cornerstone Development Authority Subarea
Regional node for shopping, office, and healthcare services.

0.25

0.5

Miles

□

ISL•~'~°''"".:.

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Recreation/Conservation: Land for which the pnmary purpose i.., for outdoor recreation or natural area conservation. This
may include puhlic or private-oVvned parks, outdoor sporting cluhs. golf courses, marinas. campground&lt;.;. or areas for which
the primar purpose is preservation and consenation of unde eloped natural areas.
Transportation, Utility &amp; Communication: Pared~ that are dedicated entirely to utility or communication facilitie::i.
containing above or below-ground utility or communication faci Ii ties. including electric and gas generating plants,
tram,mis~ion line::i. booster and transtormer stations. related storage yard~. county drains. detention/retention basins etc.
Airports. railroad yards, buildings related to utility and telecommunications companies. waste water treatment planLs. and
water worh are included in this category. but road rights-of-wa) or transmission lines and utilities within easements that
cross parcels dedicated to another pnmary use i':&gt; not included.
Extractive: Parcels that arc primarily useJ for '.-&gt;url'acc mining and extraction of materials such as gra\.cl. '.-&gt;tone. rnim:rals.
ore. soil, or peat.
Vacant: Any parcel not included in one ol the above dcfinilions. These include areas nol in a committed primary or
accessory use. Vacant lands can be either undeveloped or developed. bul not in active use at the lime or this ~urvey .
Water: Areas that are covered by water.
Right-Of-Way: Areas thal arc predominately used for vehicular and rail Lransporlation. The:--c areas may also contain
pede~trian walkway. utility easements. railroad cro~sings. and/or on-street parking areas.
Source: Oal-..lanu County Land Use Program. LSI. Planning. Inc.

been developed in subdivisions with curvilinear street
patterns and medium lot sizes. Older structures have
generally been developed on more grid-like street
pallerns and smaller and narrower lots. while newer
structures have generally been developed on cul-desacs with large. wide lots. The newest single-family
subdivisions have been developed along the City's
western boundary along Inkster Road.
Multiple-Family Residential. Multiple-family
residential land uses include apartments.
condominiums. townhouses and nm houses. These
land uses comprise approximately l .:t=iO acres or 8
percent or Southfield's h)Lal area. Multiple-family
residences arc often developed at significantly higher
densities than other land uses and their lanJ
consumption is generally low relative lo the numher
of housing units.
There are two subcategories of multiple-family
residences: Low Rise and Mid/High Rise. Low Rise
multiple-family parcels make up 7 percent of the
City. while mid/high rise parcels make up
approximately 1 percent. Mid/high rise parcels,
especially apartmenL anJ condominium tower.. can
house larger numhers of residents without consuming
large parcels of land. As a result, the large number or
multiple-family residential units in Southfield is not
wc11 reflected by their acreage. Nevertheless, the
share of land devoted to multiple-family residential
uses is four times greater in Southfield than in
Oakland County.

Multiple-family residences in Southfield arc largely
concentrated around the commercial and office uses.
They often help provide buffers between low
intensity single-family residential areas and higher
intensity commercial and office uses. and can help
support the nearby commercial uses. They arc
generally accessed from major road thoroughfares.
Commercial/Office. As the third largest land use
category, commercial and office uses comprise a far
larger share of Southfield's land than they do for the
County. Commercial and office uses occupy over
2,000 acres of land in Southfield. or 12 percent or the
land area. Because these businesses rely on
automohile and vehicular access. the commercial and
office land uses arc concentrated around the major
transportation thoroughfares of M-10, Telegraph
Road, and 8 Mile Road. and to a lesser extent along
Southfield Road, Lahser Road, Greenfield Road, and
portions of IO Mile and 12 Mile Roads.
The significant acreage devoted to these land uses
~hows that Southfield is a major employment center
for the metro area. Over the next few decades.
employment estimates are projected lo grow only
slightly before leveling off after 2015. as seen in
figure 6-1 (sec next page). This modest growth
reflects the largely developed character of the
landscape.
There are several important employment nodes in
Southfield. Many of these were identified in Joel
Garreau's 1991 book Edge City. An Edge City is
generally described as any secondary city in a major
Managing Land Use for the Future 6-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

metropolitan area containing a
significant amount of retail and office
space and a high enough concentration
of jobs that its daytime population is
greater than its evening population.
Southfield is considered an Edge City,
containing more than 26 million square
feet of office space, 4 million square feet
of retail, with employees from across the
metro area commuting to work from
other communities.

Figure 6-1: Employment Projections
140,000
120,000

-

100,000

---

C:
Cl)

E

&gt;
0
C.

E
w

80,000
60,000
40,000

-

------

-

-

--

Industrial. Industrial uses include
--------20,000
manufacturing plants and their
Q -1--------------------associated warehousing facilities as well
201)
"990
2000
2020
2030
2040
as high intensity commercial uses such
Source: SEMCOG Regional Forecast
as junk yards and waste disposal sites.
Southfield has relatively few industrial
land uses, comprising approximately 350
acres or 2 percent of the landscape. These uses are
provide numerous outdoor recreational opportunities
primarily concentrated along 8 Mile road and along
to the residents of Southfield and are a significant
Telegraph Road, south of 10 Mile.
part of the quality of life they enjoy.
Light Industrial. Light industrial uses include lowintensity manufacturing, assembly, and packaging of
goods, as well as laboratories. Roughly 129 acres of
light industrial lands are located in Southfield,
making up less than 1% of the total land area. These
uses are concentrated along 8 Mile Road, Lahser
Road north of 8 Mile Road, and along the Telegraph
Road corridor south of 9 Mjle Road.
Public/Institutional. Public and institutional land
uses are operated in the public interest and are
typically exempt from property taxes. These uses
include governmental offices, cemeteries, hospitals,
educational facilities, and religious organizations.
Approximately 1,400 acres (8 percent) in Southfield
are devoted to these civic activities. They are well
distributed throughout the community, many within
residential neighborhoods. The largest
public/institutional parcels include the Southfield
Municipal Complex, the Lawrence Tech campus,
Holy Sepulchre Cemetery, Word of Faith
International Christian Center (former Duns Scotus
campus), and the Southfield High School campus.
Recreation/Conservation. Recreation and
conservation land uses include public and private
parks, golf courses, and conservation areas. In
Southfield, these areas comprise approximately 720
acres or 4 percent of the City. These include the
Evergreen and Beech Woods municipal golf courses,
Plum Hollow golf course, Bauervic Woods Park,
Valley Woods Nature Preserve, and the new
Carpenter Lake Nature Preserve. These land uses

Transportation, Utility, and Communication.
Transportation land uses include state, county, and
local road authority facilities as well as transit
facilities. Utility land uses include facilities and
lands occupied by gas, electric, water and sewer
providers. Communication uses include transmission
towers and other broadcast and telecommunication
facilities and operations. These uses comprise 23 I
acres ( I percent) of the land in Southfield. They
include the WXYZ, WWJ, and WKBD facilities , the
Greyhound Bus terminal, the Oakland County Road
Commission yard, the Southeast Oakland Water
Authority facilities , and the Detroit Edison hydrogen
technology park.
Vacant. Vacant land includes those parcels that are
not in use and are not an accessory to an adjacent
land use, such as a playground or storage yard. This
vacant land has not been developed or is not currently
in use and is most likely to be the target of future
development. At the same time, these lands may be
undesirable to developers due to restrictions of
wetlands or access. Vacant lands represent
approximately 720 acres (4 percent) in Southfield.
Water. There are no major lakes in Southfield, so
water bodies do not comprise a large portion of the
landscape. Water makes up approximately 110 acres
of Southfield. Several key waterways, including the
Rouge River and its tributaries - Franklin Branch,
Pebble Creek, and Evans Creek - flow through the
City.

Managing land Use for the Future 6-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Right-of-Way. Transportation rights-of-way are
lands owned by public and private transportation
organizations for road corridors. Rights-of-way are
required for on-street parking, turning lanes, future
roadway expansions, highway shoulders, utilities,
sidewalks and pathways. They are the second largest
land use in Southfield, encompassing over 3,000
acres (18 %). They are only the fourth largest land
use in Oakland County, covering 10% of the
landscape. The large portion of land devoted to
transportation rights-of-way are clearly visible in the
land use map, particularly the large areas devoted to
Southfield ' s many freeways and interchanges.

Land Use Comparison
Distribution of land uses in Southfield can be
understood further by comparison to the distribution
in similar sized cities in the area. The Oakland
County cities of Farmington Hills, Troy, Novi, and
Pontiac were selected for comparison based on the
similarity of their population and land area. Table 62 shows the population, total acreage, and
distribution of land uses for Southfield and each of
the comparison cities.

recreation/conservation land and industrial uses.

Determining Factors
Southfield has a number of opportunities and
limitations that will influence future development.
Positive influences on growth include excellent
access from I-696, M-10 and Telegraph Road, as well
as abundant employment opportunities. While the
accessibility and high traffic volumes are a draw for
commercial uses, other areas need to maintain a quiet
residential setting.
The future land use plan should guide the future
development pattern of the community into a logical
arrangement which maintains the character of
Southfield, provides for economic development and
ensures adequate services and land for a11 types of
lawful land uses where there is a public need and a
suitable location(s) in the City. The factors involved
in determining future land use include:
■
■
■

Southfield stands out most significantly from its
neighbors in the share of its land in multiple-family
and office/commercial use. It has the highest share in
both land uses. This is consistent with the view of
Southfield as an employment and population center.
Southfield has the smallest share of water,

■

■

•

Consistency with existing land use patterns.
Relationship to uses in surrounding communities
to ensure compatibility at city boundaries.
Reduction in incompatible land use relationships.
Creation of suitable land use transitions through
intermediary uses like office between singlefamily and larger scale commercial uses.
Suitability of the site for different land uses in
terms of site size, features and adjacent uses.
Maintenance of aesthetic qualities that contribute

Table 6-2: Land Use Comparison, 2005

Population 2005
Acreage
Agriculture
Single-Family
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
Office/Commercial
Industrial/Light Industrial
Public/Institutional
Recreation/Conservation
Transp/Util/Comm
Extractive
Vacant
Water
Rights-of-Way

Southfield
76,818
16,819
0.0%
40.1%
7.7 %
0.0%
11 .9%
2.9%
8.4%
4.7%
1.4%
0.0%
4.2%
0.6%
18.0%

Farmington Hills
80,223
21 ,309
0.0%
44.1%
7. 1%
0.2%
6.1%
4.1 %
5.8%
9.6%
0.4%
0.0%
4.1 %
1.1 %
17.4%

Troy
81 , 168
21 ,524
0.0%
42.2%
3.7%
0.2%
9.7 %
7.5%
6.3%
5.9%
1.6%
0.0%
4.6%
1.2%
17.0%

Novi
53, 115
20,019
0.5 %
24.6%
5.3%
1.5 %
7.7%
5.2%
4.0%
11.7%
1.6%
0.4%
18.7%
5.8%
12.8%

Pontiac
67,331
12,98 3
0.0%
24.1%
4.1%
0.5%
6.1%
12.5%
9.9%
5.7%
3.1%
0.0%
14.4%
2.5%
17.1%

Sources: US Census Bureau Population Estimates, Oakland County Land Use Program

~uttlfield.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-5

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•

•
•
•
•
•

to the community character and quality of Jife.
Existing p1anning policies and zoning
regulations.
Availability of infrastructure including utilities,
roads and community facilities.
Average daily traffic volumes on adjacent
streets.
Preservation of natura] features and
consideration of the effects of development on
the environment.
Market conditions for various land uses.
Goals of the Plan that express the community
character desired by residents.

the desired design and access.

•

•

•
•

Future Land Use Plan
Southfield' s future land use plan establishes land use
categories, illustrates the location of planned land
uses and provides strategies for implementation.
This section also provides a rationale for the
placement of preferred land uses and the intensity of
those uses. The p]an serves as the primary policy
guide for future land use decisions, investment in
public improvements and coordination of public
improvements and private development, recognizing
that new situations and opportunities that cannot be
foreseen may arise. The p1an presents an idealized
future indicated by the growth patterns in the City.
The plan, however, also provides practical guidance
for local decision-makers regarding current issues.
The recommendations in this p]an are designed to be
flexible , provided that they support the overal1
governing principles and goals of this plan.
Deviations from and changes to the future land use
plan should be carefully considered to ensure that
consistency with the governing principles and goals
of this plan is maintained when making decisions on
planning and development matters. Development
trends and the character of specific areas may change
over time and deviations from the future land use
plan may be appropriate where the deviation is not
contrary to the governing principles and goals of this
plan.
A listing of the future land use categories as
illustrated on Map 6-2: Future Land Use and a brief
summary of each category is listed below, followed
by a more detailed description of the location,
objective, land uses, and general character
description for each category. Descriptions of four
more .sp~cific subareas follow the land use category
descnpt10ns. These subareas identified during the
process warrant a greater level of flexibility in future
land uses and a higher level of guidelines detailing

~

uthfield.

•
•

•

•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•

Low Density Single-Family Residential.
Single-family homes on lots 20,000 sq. ft. or
larger, permit complimentary small scale
institutional uses .
Moderate Density Single-Family Residential.
Single-family homes on lots less than 20,000 sq .
ft. , permit complimentary small scale
institutional uses.
Low Density Multiple-Family Residential.
Townhouses and multiple-family units, generally
under 2 stories.
Moderate Density Multiple-Family
Residential. Multiple-family units over 2
stories.
Local Mixed-Use. Primarily business in nature,
mixture of neighborhood commercial, service
and office with accessory multiple-family uses.
Regional Mixed-Use. Primarily business in
nature, mixture of large scale commercial,
service and office with accessory multiple-family
uses.
Office/Research. Corporate and medical
offices, research facilities, TV stations.
Educational/Medical Institutions. Regional
college or hospital campuses.
Light Industrial. Wholesale, warehouse and
industrial operations with minimal external
impacts.
Industrial. Wholesale, warehouse and industrial
operations.
Public Parks and Recreation. City owned or
operated recreation facilities and open space.
Private Parks and Recreation. Privately
owned or operated recreation facilities and open
space.
Technology Corridor Subarea. Concentrated
corridor consisting of high-tech office and
research.
City Centre Subarea. Mixed-use area that
serves as the community meeting place or heart
of Southfield.
North Southfield Road Subarea. Unique area
that contains a mixture of multi-cultural retail
and services.
Cornerstone Development Authority Subarea .
Regional shopping and medical office
destination.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-6

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Low Density Single-Family Residential
Single-family homes on lots 20,000 square feet or larger

Location. Primarily located in the southwest portion
of the City, west of Telegraph Road, south of 11 Mile
Road. Pockets also exist between 9 Mile and 10 Mile
just east of Telegraph, south of 13 Mile Road
between Southfield and Greenfield Roads, and in the
neighborhoods surrounding the 12 Mile and
Telegraph intersection.
Objective. Low Density Single-Family Residential
in Southfield should protect the vitality of existing,
high-quality neighborhoods. Areas located on
natura1ly constrained lands should promote use of an
open space cJustered design to allow a reasonable
number of homes while preserving the area' s natural
resources and creating high-quality neighborhoods.
Land Use. This designation is intended to
accommodate single-family homes on lots that are
half an acre or larger and roughly corresponds with
the R-E zoning district. Where natural features
constrain the buildable area of a development,
clustered development with permanently dedicated
open space should be encouraged to preserve
Southfield's natural resources. Accessory and support
uses such as small to moderate sized churches, parks
and schools may be considered, provided they do not
disrupt the character of the neighborhoods. Such
uses should be considered special land uses within
the single-family districts to ensure compatibility.

Southfield
--;:7'"

-

-

Home occupations in neighborhoods have been an
item of discussion in the City. Southfield currently
does not allow home occupations, a profession
carried on by an occupant of a dwelling as a
secondary use which is subservient to the main
residential use. Today's business climate lends itself
to people working out of their homes, and most
communities accommodate it, with some parameters
to ensure the residential nature of the neighborhood is
protected. Regulations should be considered that
permit small scale home occupations provided they
do not physically alter the appearance of the
dwelling, do not increase traffic volume and do not
require additional parking.

General Character Description. To protect the
vitality and character of the existing Low Density
Single-family Residential neighborhoods in the City,
development in these areas should continue to follow
the traditional neighborhood design principles that
currently prevail in these areas. Infill and
redevelopment in existing neighborhoods must be
compatible with the surrounding environment,
including massing, size, spacing and architectural
styles that are compatible with the surrounding
established residential neighborhoods. Street design
in new developments should include an
interconnected street system, sidewalks, street trees
and adequate lighting.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-7
·

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

A unique low density single-family area is found on
Farmbrook Road, north of 12 Mile Road between
Franklin and Telegraph Roads . This area has a
distinct rural character and potential geological issues
that need to be considered during any potential
redevelopment. While the density may be increased
slightly, homes in this areas should still fall within

the low density category and take advantage of the
unique water features. The design of Farmbrook
Road shall retain its open and rural character.
Any redevelopment options should consider
clustering the development to retain open space.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-8

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Moderate Density Single-Family Residential
Single-family homes on lots less than 20,000 ~quare feet

Location. The majority of the residential
neighborhoods within Southfield fall into this
category.
Objective. Moderate Density Single-Family
Residential development contributes to the goal of
providing a larger variety of single-family housing
types and price ranges to accommodate residents in
all stages of life. This variety should include
residential development designed to attract young
professionals from other areas to begin and grow
their careers. Furthermore, the higher density singlefamily residential development allows for increased
walkability and pedestrian connections to nearby
commercial, institutional, and civic uses.
Land Use. This designation is intended to
accommodate single-family residential development
on lots that are smaller than half an acre. Lot sizes
can range from 7,500 square feet up to 20,000 square
feet and corresponds generally with the R-A and R-1
through R-4 zoning districts. Accessory and support
uses such as small to moderate sized churches, parks
and schools may be considered, provided they do not
disrupt the character of established neighborhoods.
Such uses should be considered special land uses to
ensure compatibility. Home occupations should also
be explored, as discussed in the Low Density SingleFamily Residential category discussed on the
previous page.

Southfield
'
-

~----;--

General Character Description. To protect the
vitality of the existing Moderate Density Singlefamily Residential neighborhoods in the City,
development in these areas should continue to follow
the traditional neighborhood design principles that
currently prevail in these neighborhoods. Infill and
redevelopment must be compatible with the
surrounding environment, including the massing,
size, spacing and architectural styles that are
compatible with the surrounding established
residential neighborhoods. Street design in new
developments should include an interconnected street
system, sidewalks, street trees and adequate lighting.
These neighborhoods face many challenges as the
lots are often smaller than desired for modem home
expansions or new development. Future
reinvestment in these neighborhoods will need to
provide spacing between homes adequate for
emergency service, while maintaining the traditional
neighborhood design principles that currently prevail.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-9

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

One unique area shown for moderate density singlefamily development is along 9 Mile Road, just west
of Telegraph Road. In the midst of this residential
area are several farm markets. Through the years,
these markets have become part of the neighborhood
ambiance. The Plan suggests the existing markets
should be encouraged to remain, and that minor
expansions to the uses would be considered with
corresponding improvements to the site to improve
appearance and access once conditional zoning is
approved. Currently the markets are nonconforming, meaning the land is zoned residential so
no other business use is permitted. If the current uses
cease, any redevelopment should be residential.
Another area that requires additional discussion is the
eastern frontage on Evergreen Road between 9 Mile
and 10 Mile Roads. Located across the street from
the Word of Faith Christian Center and accessed off
of a busy north-south arterial in the City, uses other
than single-family residential may be appropriate if
well designed. Small scale office and multiplefamily uses may be considered along this stretch if
the buildings are designed with a residential
appearance and are well buffered from the
established neighborhood to the east.

~ 11thfield.
"'

Managing Land Use for the Future 6- 1O

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Low Density Multiple-Family Residential
Townhouses and multiple-family units, generally under two stories

Location. Scattered throughout Southfield, Low
Density Multiple-family Residential uses are usually
found on major roads and abutting non-residential
areas.
Objective. Low Density Multiple-Family
Residential is intended for residential land uses at a
higher intensity, or density, than the single-family
areas, with the objective to promote a mixture of
housing opportunities throughout the City. Multiplefamily residential development allows for increased
walkability and pedestrian connections to nearby
commercial, institutional, and civic uses. The Low
Density Multiple-Family Residential designation
offers home ownership possibilities not typical of
higher density multiple-family areas. This
designation also works well as a transitional use by
buffering lower intensity single-family uses from
higher intensity commercial uses and roadways with
higher traffic volumes.
Land Use. Intended land uses within Low Density
Multiple-Family Residential areas include attached
single-family buildings, duplexes or low density
multiple-family developments. This includes
townhouses, attached condominiums, apartments and
senior housing developments under two stories. The
expected density range of this classification is up to
30 units per acre and corresponds with the R-T and
R-M zoning districts.

General Character Description. Low Density
Multiple-family Residential development should
include high-quality design that emphasizes
pedestrian connections with surrounding uses,
provides alternative housing options, and act as a
buffer between single-family neighborhoods and
higher intensity uses.
Future development under this designation should be
designed to maintain a neighborhood scale and
character so as to limit potential adverse impacts to
adjacent single-family areas. New development
should possess innovative design elements that are
consistent with the residential character of the City
such as ranch-style units or stacked condominiums
with individual entrances that are more common in
owner-occupied units.
Some areas will be
appropriate for cluster
development in order
to protect open space
and preserve key
natural features while
still permitting
adequate density.
The area on the east
side of Berg Road
north of 8 Mile Road
is an example of a site
that is suggested for
cluster development.
Managing Land Use for the Future 6-11

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Moderate Density Multiple-Family Residential
Multiple-family units over two stories

Location. Moderate Density Multiple-Family
Residential areas are generally located on major
roads such as along Telegraph and Greenfield Roads,
Northwestern Highway, or near activity nodes such
as Northland Mall and Providence Hospital.
Objective. Moderate Density Multiple-Family
Residential development in Southfield contributes to
the goal of providing a wide variety of housing types
and price ranges to accommodate residents of all
lifestyles. Multiple-family development provides
living options with pedestrian connections to nearby
commercial, institutional, and civic uses. They
provide both affordable housing in the City and
homes for those seeking low and no maintenance
ownership opportunities. These developments may
also cater to the growing older age segments of the
population.

General Character Description. Moderate Density
Multiple-Family Residential development should
possess innovative design elements that are
consistent with the character of the City. The design
of the multiple-family buildings should complement
adjacent single-family neighborhoods, but may
feature buildings with first-floor communal entrances
that emphasize pedestrian connections with nearby
shopping and transportation opportunities. Careful
site and building design is needed for these uses to
ensure resident safety. Use of Crime Prevention
through Environmental Design (CPED) techniques
are recommended for sites within this designation.

Land Use. Permitted land uses within Moderate
Density Multiple-Family Residential areas include a
variety of multiple-family developments, with a focus
on apartment or loft complexes, and senior housing
over two stories in height. The expected density
range of this classification is from 30 to 60 units per
acre and corresponds with the RMM and RMU
zoning districts.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-12

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Local Mixed-Use
Primarily business in nature, mixture of neighborhood commercial, service and office with accessory
multiple-family uses

Location. Local Mixed-Use nodes are found
strategically throughout the City. Primarily located
at intersections of Mile Roads and corresponding
north/south arterials, Local Mixed-Use areas are also
found along many of the Mile Roads, Greenfield,
Southfield, and Lahser Roads.
Objective. Local Mixed-Use areas provide
convenient and easily accessible businesses and
services, along with alternative housing options in a
concentrated area. These nodes of activity are
intended to include uses that support nearby
residential neighborhoods without adversely
impacting the residents. The localized, neighborhood
configuration of these nodes promote local trips and
walkability.
Land Use. Uses within Local Mixed-Use areas
include a mixture of residential and non-residential
uses, both vertically and horizontally. This includes
live/work units, upper story residential units, attached
townhouses, multiple-family buildings, small-scale
retail establishments of less than 20,000 square feet,
personal service businesses, restaurants and offices.
Businesses considered appropriate should
conveniently serve the immediate neighborhoods,
within a one-and-a-half-mile radius.
General Character Description. With a stronger
focus on building form rather than land use, sites
within the Local Mixed-Use designation should be
integrated into surrounding neighborhoods. This can

~outhfi~-9.

be accomplished through traditional design elements
that replicate the character of adjacent
neighborhoods, promote walkability within the area,
and provide shared access whenever possible.
Redevelopment should focus on requiring consistent
site upgrades as development occurs, including
improved site design, access management, building
facades and landscaping. Generally, parking areas
should be in the rear or side rather than in the front of
the building. The scale and size of the developments
in these areas should be limited to promote a
pedestrian scale environment, minimize traffic
impacts and be compatible with adjacent
neighborhoods. In addition, adequate buffering shall
be provided to minimize noise and light impacts on
the residential neighborhoods.
A couple of sites exist on Franklin Road, just west of
Telegraph that are currently
used as single-family homes.
Redevelopment of this area
should consider low
intensity mixed use
residential and office, with
limited commercial uses.
Any redevelopment of these
sites will require deep
buffers and residential
design to be consistent with
the neighborhood to its west.
Managing Land Use for the Future 6-13

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Location. Regional Mixed-Use centers are located
around existing nodes of activity at Northland Mall,
certain sections of 8 Mile Road, along Northwestern
Highway and Telegraph north of I-696.
Objective. Regional Mixed-Use uses tend to cater to
automobile traffic from a broader market area and
provide a wide variety of businesses and services to
residents, employees and visitors to the metro Detroit
region. These regional nodes of activity are intended
to include uses that support residential neighborhoods
without adversely impacting the residents.
Land Use. Uses within Regional Mixed-Use areas
promote a mixture of residential and non-residential
uses, both vertically and horizontally. This includes
live/work units, apartment complexes, senior
housing, a variety of large and small scale retail
establishments, personal service businesses,
restaurants and offices. These areas may contain
hotels, movie theaters, drive-through restaurants and
dealerships as well. The larger scale of these areas
will require a large amount of floor space and
parking, as they cater to a regional market.

Southfield
--.~

;;;;;,-

General Character Description. Similar to the
Local Mixed-Use designation, the focus in the
Regional Mixed-Use designation is not particularly
on use but on form and layout of the site. Since
much of these areas are already developed, the
challenge will be in encouraging redevelopment and
consistently requiring site upgrades as development
occurs. These upgrades include improved site
design, access management strategies to improve
traffic circulation both in the roadway and between
businesses, higher quality and diversified building
facades, sustainable landscaping, etc. New
development should be of unique design, placement,
and architecture, with a mixture of uses to strengthen
these existing regional nodes.
An existing singlefamily residential node
exists on the north side
of 12 Mile Road just
east of Inkster Road.
While the lots near 12
Mile should remain,
the north end of this
subdivision could be
identified for
expansion of either
multiple-family
condos to the west or
as office and retail
uses along
Northwestern Highway.
Managing Land Use for the Future 6-14

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Office/Research
Corporate and medical offices, research facilities. TV stations

Location. Office/Research uses are focused along
the service drives to 1-696 and M- 10 and within the
American Commerce Center on 11 Mile Road.
Objective. Office/Research uses are important to the
City as they diversify the tax base, balance traffic
flow associated with residential/commercial uses, and
provide employment opportunities.
Land Use. Representative uses include corporate
headquarters, research facilities and centers,
technology or pilot testing facilities, micro-electronic
and biotechnology uses, and certain industrial
operations such as pharmaceutical production that are
compatible with others uses envisioned within the
designation along with a limited amount of
commercial uses such as hotels and restaurants.

General Character Description. While the
definition of Office/Research is somewhat broad, the
intent is to concentrate certain compatible uses in a
planned, campus-like setting with more extensive
landscaping, higher quality architecture and more site
amenities than typically found in general industrial
areas. Outdoor storage of materials and equipment is
limited, with screening required where it is to occur.
Ancillary commercial uses should only be permitted
if the following criteria could be met:
•

•

•

The amount of commercial will not
materiaily erode or diminish the property
available for the Office/Research uses.
The commercial uses would include those to
serve both nearby residents and employees
and visitors to the Office/Research uses.
Traffic impacts should be addressed, as
commercial uses tend to generate more
traffic than Office/Research uses.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-15

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Location. Educational/Medical Institutions include
the existing facilities and planned expansion areas
around Lawrence Technological University at the
Lodge Freeway and IO Mile, Oakland County
Community College and Providence Hospita], both
located off of 9 Mile in the City's southeast comer.

General Character Description. These campuses
are park-like settings with integrated site design and
access. Future expansion of these facilities should be
consistent with the existing campus, respect
surrounding land uses, and provide a balanced
mixture of uses that minimizes off-site impacts.

Objective. These institutions provide local choices
for high quality medical and educational
opportunities located within the city of Southfield. In
addition, they serve as a regional draw for people to
come to the City, thereby enhancing the City's local
economy.

Expansion plans for Lawrence Technological
University should be encouraged by the City and
should be directed towards the area immediately to
the west of the existing campus.

Land Use. This category includes regional college
and hospital campuses with a complementary mixture
of uses. Included in this category are Lawrence
Technological University, Oakland County
Community Co11ege, Providence Hospital and related
offices, residences, and other ancillary uses.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-16

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Light Industrial
Wholesale, warehouse and industrial operations with minimal external impacts

Location. Light Industrial areas are focused in the
southern portion of the City, off of 8 Mile Road, at
Lahser Road and a small portion on East Street.
Objective. Light Industrial is in tended for a variety
of lower intensity industrial operations, such as light
manufacturing, and assembly, research, and
technology and industrial offices. Light Industrial
developments are an important source of employment
and tax base, and have significantly less impact on
surrounding areas than Industrial uses.

General Character Description. Redevelopment of
Light Industrial areas should include improved site
design, access management tools, attractive building
facades and significant landscaping to establish a
park-like setting. Similarly, new development should
take the form of a design-controlled, industrial/
research park, with integrated site planning. The
planned industrial centers provide an environment for
a mix of office, commercial, light industrial, and
research uses within a contro11ed environment.
External nuisances, such as noise and odors, should
be minimized through design and activity restrictions.

Land Use. Appropriate uses for the Light Industrial
district include high-tech industries, research
laboratories, light assembly operations and corporate
offices. Commercial uses that support industrial
activities are encouraged in these areas. Heavy,
smokestack industries and large warehouse
operations dependent on heavy trucking or rail are
not intended for this district.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-17

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Location. Industrial areas are limited to three
distinct areas located off of 8 Mile Road.
Objective. Due to the City's access to major
transportation routes, industrial uses could play an
important role in the economy of the City. While
such uses are desirable in terms of tax base and job
creation, they must be located appropriately so as to
limit adverse impacts to lower intensity uses.
Land Use. Appropriate uses for the Industrial
district include high-tech industries, research
laboratories, light assembly operations and corporate
offices. Commercial uses that support industrial
activities and provide complementary services are
encouraged along major arterial roads. Heavy,
smokestack industries and large warehouse
operations dependent on heavy trucking or rail are
not intended for this district.

General Character Description. Areas with
Industrial designations require special planning and
site design. The operation of these uses may involve
heavy truck traffic, outdoor storage, rail access, odors
and noise. As with the Light Industrial designation,
site design, appearance and buffering are important to
ensure that such impacts are limited, especially where
they abut residential land uses. Development and
redevelopment of these areas should concentrate on
minimizing impacts by screening outdoor storage
areas and facing overhead doors away from the street
or neighboring residential areas so that loading and
unloading activities are not visible.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-18

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Location. Public Parks and Recreation uses are
located throughout Southfield, strategically located to
best serve City residents.
Objective. Public Parks and Recreation facilities in
the City are intended to provide a wide variety of
high quality park facilities in locations that are
convenient for residents and visitors alike. The City
has a separate Parks and Recreation Plan, which more
specifically discusses the existing and planned
facilitie and outlines goals and objectives for
maintaining the City' s Parks system.
Land Use. Land uses included in the Public Parks
and Recreation category are City-owned or operated
recreation facilitie uch as sports field , golf courses
playgrounds, pathways and nature trail . picnic areas,
and open pace areas. A mixture of pas ive and
active recreation is encouraged.

General Character Description. Preservation of
open space and the availability of recreation facilities
are extremely important to City residents. This
promotes a higher quality of life and increases the
desirability of the City. Parks should continue to be
integrated into the City's neighborhoods to create a
unified system. The sizes of the spaces should vary
depending on their function. eighborhood parks
and open space areas should be less than two acres in
size and areas serving the community should be
upwards of five acres in size. Parks and open spaces
should offer opportunities for recreation, picnicking
and relaxing. Pedestrian accessibility should be
accomplished through sidewalk connections to the
neighborhood and pathways throughout the site .

Vacant or underutilized ite and sites with
significant natural features that are located next to
existing parks hould be explored by the City for
opportunities for park expansion and to develop a
cohesive open pace system.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-19

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Location. Private Parks and Recreation uses include
existing privately owned facilities including the Plum
Hollow Golf Club on the corner of 9 Mile and Lahser
Road and the Cranbrook Swim Club on Evergreen
Road south of 13 Mile Road.
Objective. Private Parks and Recreation facilities in
the City provide recreation opportunities that
complement those provided by the Parks and
Recreation Department and provide residents with
greater choices to meet their recreation needs.
Land Use. Land uses included in the Private Parks
and Recreational category are private recreation
facilities such as golf courses, private clubs, athletic
fields, and indoor sports facilities.

General Character Description. New privately
owned recreation facilities should be located so as to
be easily accessible to residents and visitors alike,
without negative impacts to residential
neighborhoods including increased traffic and sound
and light pollution. Pedestrian accessibility should
be included in the design through sidewalk
connections and pathways throughout the sites.

If redevelopment of the existing facilities were to
occur, the City should evaluate the most desirable reuse of the land that would create the least disturbance
to surrounding residential neighborhoods.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-20

�-T-ech~-ology Corridor Subarea ,'

-':,;',;'/~~l~,-,: =··:·-·· _,,,_

Concentrated corridor consisting of high-tech office and r:esearch

.

_ •-

.

,

.~:. _-. ' : •

-~~~-~;~~f~~-?1?0~?~~~?)_: :'
· .
. - ·: &gt;i..~ .: ,._ _
~
, ;· ,- ·. •• - ; t~.• _;,:~;~~;;~&lt;~ -~--ki.,-~,

- . ,;,

-~~-~•

.

:·? ·c·_-:-~~~;~l~'

, · ·
_

___._....·.-._.

~=-- __

,-,-'&lt;a••-.:~~~---.;-_"_:-,·_-::-_:---~-~-:\!:

.

!_,~·;.,=&gt;&lt;--~•:~ •.. -~ ;~ ..:·.~~..C.

· ... -:_~,·~-

:• - ',._.

:-_. }{_,

:r~~t:~

Location
Telegraph Road frontage between 8 Mile Road and I-696, including some southern parcels near 8 Mile Road .
Regional Context
Telegraph Road (M-24) is one of the major north/south arterials within metropolitan Detroit, connecting 1-94, I-696 and M-59. Spanning over 70 miles from Pontiac, Michigan to Toledo, Ohio ;
Telegraph Road travels through numerous, urban, suburban and rural communities and varies significantly in its form throughout its length. Within the city of Southfield, Telegraph Road is a six to
eight lane road divided by a wide landscaped median. While much of the frontage on Telegraph is developed, potential exists for future redevelopment and intensification of uses along the corridor. As
a result, this corridor was identified as a subarea to guide future investment in the corridor.
Objectives
• Create a more clustered technology/research &amp; development land use pattern in strategic locations to concentrate activity along this established corridor.
•
Redevelop vacant and underutilized sites and buildings to uses that complement existing businesses.
•
Use access management standards to reduce the number of access points, reduce crash potential and improve traffic flow. Shared access systems should also be considered in some cases.
•
Work with the Michigan Department of Transportation to upgrade the aesthetic appearance and operation of Telegraph Road through median and streetscape improvements.
• Encourage more pedestrian activity among sites.
•
Foster a healthy foundation of commerce, technology/research &amp; development/light industrial businesses and link to higher education institutions found in Southfield (i.e. Lawrence Technological
University along Civic Center Drive).
•
Implement a Special Assessment District (SAD) to provide corridor-wide enhancements and promotion, with specific emphasis on the unique, innovative or cutting-edge users found in the area or a
Corridor Improvement Authority to implement and manage private and public improvements/enhancements in the area.
•
Use sustainable design practices when new and infill deve]opment occurs.
• Continue to enhance the Rouge Green Corridor located in the north and south end of the Telegraph Road corridor.
•
Promote the use of green design principles in building and site design and encourage the development of LEED certified buildings.
Land Use
The emphasis within this subarea is primarily Office/Research and Technology uses with secondary Regional Mixed-Use retail, services and residential that will attract residents, workers, and visitors
from a large service area beyond the boundaries of the City. The intent is to create a concentrated employment center that will complement surrounding existing and planned land uses in this area of the
City. Existing commercial uses and R&amp;D uses are interspersed along this corridor and additiona] commercial uses are planned to complement the Office/Research and Technology and serve
expressway travelers, workers, and neighborhoods. A diversity of commercial uses is imperative to ensure that this market area is properly served. Limits should be placed on the number of certain
uses, such as hotels and automobile service uses, to maintain the necessary variety of businesses.

~uthfiel9_

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-21

�-

I
City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Technology Corridor Subarea Recommendations
Circulation
■
Adopt access management policies to ensure appropriate spacing of driveways that front onto Telegraph Road. Where
appropriate, shared access systems should be provided.
• Coordinate work efforts with MDOT and Road Commission for Oakland County to obtain grants for roadway-related
improvements.
Work with MDOT and Road Commission for Oakland County to coordinate and improve timing of traffic lights along
Telegraph.
Encourage roadway projects by private developers through coordination with MDOT and Road Commission for Oakland
County.
■
Incorporate safety/security design techniques for all public places to ensure employees are provided with adequate open
spaces.
■
Create a safe system of walkways linking buildings and parking areas to the public sidewalk system.
Enhance existing pedestrian and bicycle systems along the Corridor by closing any gaps in the sidewalk system, or installing
wider pathways at transit stops or where high pedestrian activity is expected.
Coordinate with SMART to add quality bus stops and shelters along the Telegraph Road Corridor and to identify any
regional connections needed to help move employees from home to work.
■
Work with area employers, if necessary, to help stagger business hours and work shifts to distribute traffic throughout the
day.

Technology Corridor Subarea Implement3ition
■

■

Work with other communities, Oakland County and individuals with vested interest in the commercial success of the
Telegraph Road corridor to ensure sufficient funding for marketing.
Project the image/brand of the corridor as a safe and exciting place for business.

Implementation
• Investigate the creation of a Special Assessment District (SAD), similar to the SAD in the area of Telegraph Road and 12
Mile Road, to provide corridor-wide enhancements and promotion, with specific emphasis on the unique, innovative or
cutting-edge users found in the area.
• Consider the establishment of a Corridor Improvement Authority to stimulate and support private investment to implement
needed roadway, landscape and streetscape improvements.

Aesthetic Enhancements
■
Buildings should be oriented in a manner that enhances views of the Rouge River and other natural features such as wetlands
and woodlands .
■
Screen surface parking from view through the use of trees, shrubs, hedges or berms .
■
Require overhead doors or loading areas to be located so they are not visible from Telegraph Road.
■
Provide intensive frontage landscaping and plantings to provide continuous visual connection along the corridor.
• Enhance the image of Telegraph Road through directional signage, City welcome signs, public art, and landscaping at 8 Mile
Road and the I-696 embankments.
Through consistent code enforcement efforts, encourage a high degree of continued site and landscape maintenance.
Where feasible, place utility lines underground or in rear yards to improve visual qualities.
■

Economic Development
• Establish partnerships between the public and private sector to assess employment trends and determine educational and
training needs that will help generate additional employment opportunities for the Southfield community and the metro
Detroit region.
•
Capitalize on the potential synergy created by directing like employers or compatible industries in proximity to each other.
• Identify and improve needed technological improvements including high-speed and wireless Internet services.
•
Create strategic investment opportunities that will increase tax base, and generate additional revenues to finance actions,
which support the Plan's goals.
•
Identify and coordinate with property owners in areas designated for potential redevelopment projects to assess their
willingness to participate on those projects.
Marketing
•
Promote the corridor as a regional employment center and target innovative or high-technology employers seeking a
supporting environment.

iolJthfielcJ.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-22

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

City Centre Subarea
, '.\lixcd-usc area that serves as the communitJ meeting place or heart of Southfield
I

Location
The City of Southfield Civic Center and the areas generally bounded by 1-696, the Lodge Expressway and Evergreen Road.
Introduction
The City Centre subarea plan defines a vision and describes expectations for the City Centre and Southfield ' s municipal complex, and its neighborhoods and institutions surrounding these two dynamic centers. The City Centre has always been a source of interest from
developers and potential investors; however, during the Comprehensive Master Plan process, serious interest seems to have intensified. It is apparent that the City and its City Centre Advisory Board ' s commitment and strength of Board members have generated that
interest, and the City will now have an effective tool for funneling and directing that interest and energy.
The purpose of the subarea plan is to establish a framework of objectives and recommendations that will help guide the transformation of the City Centre into a pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use district and create a more meaningful and memorable place that adds to the
identity and quality of life in Southfield.

City Centre Subarea Goal
Create a daytime, evening and weekend activity center that is easily identifiable, pedestrian-oriented, and incorporates a mix of uses and activities.
Objectives
Create a daytime, evening, and weekend activity center that is easily identifiable, pedestrian-oriented , and incorporates a mix of uses and activities.
•
Provide an environment conducive to and support of living, working, shopping and entertainment.
•
Accommodate a variety of densities and scales of development that are sensitive to existing development and its context and the demands of the marketplace.
•
Enhance roadways, which improves the Subarea's visibility and accessibility.
•
Provide improved connections from Lawrence Technological University to the City Centre.
•
Make the City Centre a unique, high amenity destination for local and regional customers.
•
Establish form-based code requirements that will assist in defining Southfield' s City Centre.
•
Provide sufficient parking for new mixed-use development and visitors to the City Centre.

.,

Graphic prepared by Rosetti

.l

Graphic prepared by Rosetti

Issues and Opportunities
. C
d
.
.
.
. 1· . continue to be the location for c
.
.
.
R d' I
. d
th l
t'
Th e C ity
entre nee s to provide local services and convenient shopping afford opportunities for recreallon and socia izmg,
• t b
. .
ommurnty-wide events and celebrations and proJ·ect a strona sense of place. ea I Y recognize as e oca IOn
.
1· .
.
,
.
. To conunue o ea thnvmg Ct
C
th
. .
o
.
1
d .th.
lki o
1
h
1
w ere peop e enJoy pub ic hfe, the Cny Centre will play a significant role in the image and identity of the entire community.
. • or
.
Y entre ere needs to be a significant presence of worker and resident population ocate w, m easy wa nb
.
·
••
.
.
nd 1n caies re staurants will st
h th
.
·
.
·ct
d
k
t l b
d1st
ance, creating a cntical popuJation density not only in the daytime but also in the evening. Seeing people on the streets a . .
The c· C
rengt en e appeal of the City Centre. While a City Centre that is enJoyed by resi ents an wor ers mus a so e
·
·
·
Th
'
'd
and
v1s1cors.
ny
entre
should
b
b
·1
h
.
.
·
·
f
J
ttr
O
a active to visitors.
ere needs to be a balance of local identity with a dynamic destination that benefits both rest ents
e ui ton t e local cultural qualities of the City, thus establishing a d1stmctne sense Pace.

~ outhfield_

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-23

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan
I

City Centre Subarea Recommendations
Parking areas should be located in the rear of properties, where service drive access is available.

Land Use
The type, range and intensity of activity are at the core of life within the City Centre and its successfulness as a place that is
attractive and meets the needs of residents. The City Centre emphasizes new residential uses, strengthens existing offices and can
provide new mixed-use, cultural, recreational and civic uses.
Provide a diversity of retail, office, residential and civic land uses that complements existing development and establishes the
City Centre as a major center of social and economic activity in the community.
Encourage retail businesses and mixture of land uses that help generate positive pedestrian activity in the area.
Establish patterns of land use and circulation that promote the desired pedestrian character of the area.
Support street level uses that are pedestrian-oriented and contribute to the vibrancy along Evergreen Road and Civic Center
Drive.

Urban Design/Streetscape
The subarea plan looks to strengthen the pedestrian scale and character of the City Centre, while balancing the efficient movement
of vehicles.

•

•

•
•
•
•

Economic Development
The vitality of the City Centre is dependent on its economic health. Bustling retail shops, thriving offices, active residential units
and enriching cultural, educational and civic facilities would contribute to the energy on the City Centre, making it an area that
people like to visit.
• Encourage the formation of a Corridor Improvement Authority. The Authority could reserve tax increment revenues for
funding capital improvements and economic development programs.
Promote public and private cooperative efforts that provide ongoing aesthetic improvement and infrastructure improv( men ts
for planned development/redevelopment projects.
Give priority or incentives to developers that reflect a unique niche and/or development that is supportive of the City's
Municipal Complex improvement and enhancements.
Economic shifts and the current regional real estate market will always be a factor in the dynamic development process in
Southfield and its City Centre. All of the partners committed to the City Centre will have to stay focused on the task at handcreating a vibrant, active City Centre. The City Centre subarea plan is, in fact the beginning of a lot of hard work and more
detailed planning for specific projects and improvements.

Improve pedestrian opportunities and create an attractive pedestrian environment within the City Centre .
Create safety buffers of street trees, planters and street furniture between walks and the street along both Evergreen Road and
Civic Center Drive. Provide widened sidewalks with a special City Centre streetscape design.
Develop pedestrian courtyards and other outdoor spaces with planting and street furniture .
Develop a City Centre plaza/town square at or near the intersection of Evergreen Road and Civic Center Drive. This grand
space will connect the City Centre to the municipal complex and serve as an active and passive space for the community and
its programmed events.
Encourage pedestrian-oriented building frontages with shops opening to the public sidewalk along sections of Evergreen
Road and Civic Center Drive.
Through design guidelines and Zoning Ordinance regulations, encourage building designs, intensity and setbacks to be
compatible with the desired scale and character of the area.
Incorporate public art as an element of development and enhancements .
Encourage the design of lighting that enhances the streetscape and facilities nighttime use of the City Centre by pedestrians .

Circulation &amp; Parking
Circu~ation and parking are keys in upgrading the City Centre. The subarea plan envisions the enhancement of existing streets,
~ffect1ve place~ent of new streets, the provision of centralized public parking and consideration of the phasing of streetscape
improvements m order to minimize the impact of construction on existing workers, merchants and residents. Accessible and
convenient parking is essential to the health and vitality of the City Centre. Current parking on individual parcels has contributed
greatly to the fragmented pattern of activities and to the lack of pedestrian activity.

•
•

•

•

•
•

Reduce disruptive traffic movements and high traffic speeds in the City Centre. Evaluate various traffic calming techniques
along ~vergreen Road and Civic Center Drive including constructing a median, on-street parking, etc.
Establish pattem_s of land use and circulation that promote the desired pedestrian character of the area .
Improve pedestnan circulation in the City Centre, including pedestrian walkways between buildings, within parking areas,
create ~ stron_g promenade between the City Centre and the municipal complex and its new development, and construct a
pedestnan bndge/plaza over the M-10/Norhwestem Highway to connect the City Centre to Lawrence Technological
University.
Improve circulation access to the City Centre at the Evergreen Road/10 Mile Road/M-10/Northwestern Highway interchange
and at the 1-696 Freeway and Evergreen Road interchange.
To further i~prove the accessibility in and around the City Centre, the City should work with the Michigan Department of
Tr~nsportatlon ~o_study a two way traffic option for the M-10/Northwestern Highway service drives from Evergreen Road/lO
Mile Road to ClVlc Center Drive.
Dev~lop a parking district(s) located within a quarter mile from various nodes of development to help satisfy parking needs
and 1~ an accepta~J~ walking distance to access a parking facility/structure while providing a more cohesive City Centre.
Provide opportunmes for shared parking facilities in the City Centre and develop parking regulations to assure that adequate
and reasonable standards are provided.
Managing Land Use for the Future 6 -24

�..

111
City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Location
Southfield Road frontage between 12 Mile and 13 Mile Roads.
Regional Context
Southfield Road is one of the major north/south arterials within metropolitan Detroit, connecting 1-94, 1-696 and 1-75. Spanning from Dearborn to
Birmingham, Southfield Road travels through nine communities and varies from a divided eight-lane highway to a two-lane residential street.
Within the city of Southfield, Southfield Freeway ends north of 9 Mile Road and maintains a five-lane design through Southfield and Lathrup
Village. While most of the frontage on Southfield is primarily developed, there has been significant reinvestment within the northern section,
between 12 Mile and 13 Mile Roads including a Home Depot, Target, a new residential condominium complex and single-family home subdivision
on the former manufactured housing site, plus new multi -cultural restaurants and shops.

Birm ingham
Beverly Hills
Lathrup Village

Southfield

Detro it
Objectives
I 96
•
Establish a land use pattern that characterizes the North Southfield Road Corridor as a unique destination consisting of compatible yet
diversified uses.
•
Plan for a safe, efficient circulation system that provides sufficient access by all modes of transportation between nodes of activity within the
Dearborn
corridor and the adjacent residential neighborhoods.
•
Establish open space and beautification efforts to create an identifiable character for the subarea, which will reflect a pleasant, appealing
atmosphere for working, shopping and residing in the north Southfield Road area.
Allen Park
•
Develop a specific Corridor Overlay Zoning District and consolidate regulations into one concise set of reasonable and consistent standards for
incoln Park
new development and redevelopment.
Ecorse
•
Maintain the diverse, identifiable character of the corridor, while promoting vitality through private sector investment.
•
Encourage the acquisition, demolition and reuse of those properties that, by virtue of their location, condition, or value, no longer function at their highest economic potential.
•
Enhance the visual and aesthetic qualities of the corridor through streetscape, landscape, roadway improvements and portals.
•
Establish the mechanisms necessary to achieve the recommendations for the North Southfield Road Corridor Subarea.
Land Use
The corridor will consist of concentrated nodes of activity, primarily commercial and office, compact enough to create critical mass of business activity, with ancillary multiple-family
residential uses, similar to the Local Mixed-Use designation. Southfield is known as a culturally diverse community in the region; however, it lacks a true multi-cultural destination. The
North Southfield Road Subarea has the potential to be that multi-cultural retail, service, office and cultural community center that c~l~brates the diversity of the City's residents and its
neighborhoods. To encourage multiple destination trips, new development and redevelopment will be designed to enhance accessibiltty of both vehicles and pedestrians.
Market conditions, the mix of uses and the expected level of activity would determine the size and focus of each use. In general, the maxi~um size of retail uses should be limited to 75,000
square feet, or mid box uses such as grocers, electronics, office and clothing stores. Big box uses should not be permitted, except as de cnbed below, due to the shallow lot depths, proximity
to residential uses, and the need to create a synergy of uses.
The St. Bede Church and Southfield Plaza Retail Center are two large sites that could be redeveloped in the future. Because of their size aod l~c~tion on the corridor, these sites have the
ability to be redeveloped as a mixed-use center, if desired by the City. Design of any new mid box retail, and any redevelopme_nt of lhe two ex'. stmg Target and Home Depot stores should
consider development of "out lots" with buildings fronting Southfield Road to minimize the presence of large parking lots and mcrease pedeStnan comfort and activity along the corridor.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-25

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Circulation
Assess existing traffic patterns and pursue improvements that will increase facility carrying capacity and traveling
convenience, such as the planned median along Southfield Road.
• For this commercial corridor, where high traffic volumes and high frequency of turning movements are expected, more
aggressive access management policies that limit the number of driveways, or consolidate drives into a few strategically
placed entrances from Southfield Road are recommended. MDOT recommends 30 access points along this mile stretch,
where today there are roughly 50 access points.
Coordinate with SMART to add quality bus stops and shelters along the Southfield Road Corridor.
Minimize or calm the impacts of increased traffic and activity levels on residential street that feed into Southfield Road.
Create safe, appealing and efficient pedestrian walkways linking activity nodes and parking areas to the public sidewalk
system.
Encourage the development of a complete pedestrian and bicycle system through the corridor.
• Coordinate work efforts with MDOT and the Road Commission for Oakland County to obtain grants for roadway- and
median-related improvements.
Encourage roadway projects by private developers through coordination with MDOT and Road Commission for Oakland
County.
Incorporate safety/security design techniques for all public places and for proposed public/private redevelopment projects.

Implementation
• Devel~p reasonable site design standards and sign regulations for new development and redevelopment within the corridor.
• Estabhsh programs that provide incentives for voluntary compliance with new construction and retrofitting of existing signs
and structures.
• Commit resources to staff and support the creation of a Corridor Improvement Authority, Public Act 280 of 2005 in
conj_unction with Lat~up Vi1lage, Beverly Hills, and Birmingham to establish an Authority along this mu1ti-jurisdictional
~om~or. !he Authonty could reserve tax increment revenues for funding capital improvements and other programs
1dent1fied m the Subarea Plan. Tax increment revenues could be leveraged through grants, bonds ,Jr other financial
mechanisms to expedite implementation.
• Advocate approval of development proposals that meet stated criteria and actively participate in the site plan approval
process.
• Overse~ the planning pro_cess and develop appropriate administrative policies for implementing the Plan effectively. The
Au~honty would work with the Planning Commissions to actively facilitate and expedite approval of private development
proJects that further the goals and strategies of the subarea.
• Promote effective communication and a cohesive, cooperative spirit among various public and private leaders with the three
other communities and the County, using the venues and talents of existing civic organizations and committee.

Aesthetic Enhancements
Provide treet trees, landscaping and plantings to provide continuous visual connections and proper pedestrian comfort along
the entire corridor.
Encourage existing development to plant additional trees and shrubs, and provide guidelines for new development and
redevelopment that require extensive landscape installation at time of development.
• Provide special paving, decorative walkway , pedestrian lighting and other physical elements that give the corridor aesthetic
improvements and a means of creating a consistent brand/image.
• Build gateways and a unified wayfinding/sign system to enhance the identity of the corridor.
Through consistent code enforcement efforts, encourage a high degree of continued site and landscape maintenance.
When undertaking streetscape improvements, new private construction and building rehabilitation/redevelopment; place
utility lines underground where feasible to improve visual qualities.
Economic Development
•
Establish partnerships between the public and private sectors for the purpose of understanding the mutual benefits of
proposed redevelopment projects.
•
Expand the economic base of the corridor by retaining existing jobs while creating new diverse employment opportunities.
Improvements that advance traffic safety and efficiency, pedestrian access, and enhance the character of the area will help to
accomplish this task.
•
Create investment strategies that will increase tax base, and generate additional revenues to finance actions, which support
the Plan's goals.
•
Identify and coordinate with property owners in areas designated for potential redevelopment projects to assess their
willingness to participate on those projects.
•
Encourage partnerships among property owners and private and public sector groups in order to implement proposed
redevelopment projects, which will achieve the Plan's goals.
•
Provide creative incentives to private sector participants in redevelopment projects and programs.
Marketing
•
Promote the corridor as having unique, multi-cultural economic activities and market its assets.
•
Work with other communities, Oakland County and individuals with vested interest in the commercial success of the
Southfield Road corridor to ensure sufficient funding for marketing.
•
Project the image/brand of the corridor as a safe and exciting place for business and family oriented patronage.
.
•
Promote the corridor as a unique center of activities that include a full range of multi-cultural commercial, office, community
and residential and neighborhood facilities as well as entertainment.

~ outhfield.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-26

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Cornerstone Development Authority Subarea
A vital Medical and Regional Shopping destination for the City or Region.

Location
The Cornerstone District is located in the southeast comer of Southfield. The district is approximately one square mile, bounded by
Mt. Vernon to the north, Greenfield Road to the east, 8 Mile Road to the south and Southfield Road to the west.

.

.

CDA 's Strategic Plan 2008-2013 .....Buildfng a Vision for Tomorrow
I

The largest land area in the District includes the Northland Shopping Center. Built in the 1950s, Northland was one of America's
first enclosed shopping centers. The District is also home to the Millennium Centre, Oakland Community College,
_
Providence/Saint John's Hospital (Southfield's largest employer), and Oakland Regional Hospital. Medical offices, com~ercial and
higher density residential uses are also included in this District. Since 2000. the District has seen residential growth, part1cularl~ m
owner-occupied units, through new and converted condominiums. Since the inception of the Cornerstone Development Authonty
(CDA). the District has seen more than $160 million in development/redevelopment construction.

Finance Mechanism
The CDA alono with the City is the driver that facilitates improvements and enhancements in the Cornerstone District. The CDA
was created in 1988 by the Southfield City Council in accordance with the Downtown Development Authority, P.A. 197 of 1975.
The CDA's operations are funded through a 2-mill tax levy and Tax Increment Finance (TIF) revenues. Using TIF revenues, the
CDA has orchestrated over $1 million in public roadway, strectscapc, gateway and landscape improvements.

The CDA has had numerous successes, including completing most of the priorities in its June 2000 Development Plan and Tax
Increment Finance Plan. The Board recognized the need for an updated strategic plan to guide its efforts, and the importance of
detailing a vision for the District's future. In April 2008, the CDA completed a Strategic Plan 2008-2013 that reestablished an
overall plan for the District, specifically considering input from stakeholders and the effects of changes in the economy,
population and housing trends. The CDA reconfirmed its mission and found the existing mission statement, with minor revisions,
still relevant and an accurate representation of the CDA' s core values and reason for being.
The CDA' s vision for the District as illustrated on this page is a Concepl Master Plan of key recommendations of this Strateoic
Plan. Today the District is a mature urban plan that includes some mixing of uses. The Plan envisions the District of tomorr~w
as:
Fully walkable, fine grain mixed use plan with retail, services, office, residential and other uses blended in a compatible
and vital mix
Able to build on the strengths of the health care, higher education and retail sectors present in the District. Attractive
public and private spaces should be created and blighting elements removed.
Opportunities to increase development density, particularly by redeveloping under-utilized parking areas, vacant land, or
obsolete buildings and sites.

Today the CDA maintains focus on attracting retailers and restaurants to the area and filling a demand by area residents and
employees for goods and services close to home and work . In addition, the CDA continues to improve the District through prop~rty
acquisition, redevelopment and renovation , landscaping and infrastructure improvements, events and promotion and investment m
strategic planning and design for the District.

Objectives
Previous Planning Efforts
Over the years the CDA has initiated several planning and economic development studies for the area including a 1999 Master Plan,
a Market Assessment Report, a study to explore a Minor League Ballpark on the Northland Shopping Center site, a Trade Area
Profile, a Public Enhancement Plan, and a District Gateway Improvement Plan. In 2005, the CDA Board developed a Mission
Statement and a list of Strategic Objectives that has guided the CDA through these past several years.

•

•
•

CDA's 2005-2007 Strategic Plan
Mission Statement
To enhance the environment by making the area in which people feel comfortable and secure as a place to live, work, shop, learn
and be entertained, and to strengthen the economic vitality and physical appearance.
Strategic Objectives
Strengthen the economic vitality
•
Attraction of businesses
•
Reuse of vacant land
•
Maintain or rehabilitate commercial stock
•
Retain current occupancy
Secure and Comfortable Community
•
Upgrade public property
•
Upgrade security presence
Northland Shopping Center
•
Facilitate improvement of the property
Millennium Centre
Establish Centre as an independent arts and events venue

~uthfield.

Connections - Create clear, attractive and well-functioning connections between Oakland Community College,
Providence Hospital, Northland Center and throughout the District. A balanced transportation system should
accommodate vehicles, pedestrians and non-motorized travel.
District Character - Enhance the overall character of the District as a vibrant mixed use place with entertainment,
destination retail, office and support services, focused on J.L. Hudson Drive corridor and Northland Center.
~nfrastructure and Aesthetics - Continue to implement streetscape, landscaping, lighting,
infrastructure and aesthetic improvements to ensure the district is an attractive, welcoming, distinctive and comfortable
place.

•

Dev~lopment/Redevelopment - Facilitate development, redevelopment and reinvestment in the District's properties
consistent with the Plan, including potential expansions of the Providence Hospital and Oakland Community College
campuses.

•

Economic Health and Vitality- Support and enhance targeted strategies of business and economic development
programs and incentives for recruitment, retention, development and redevelopment.

Recommendations
Connections
•
•
•

Develop a new pedestrian/bike/vehicular connector between Oakland Community College, the Mi11ennium Centre, and
J.L. Hudson Drive.
Create a walkable District with sidewalks along all public streets.
Expand the Oakland Community College/Millennium Centre connector to Providence Hospital, Northland Center and
other destinations via linkages of public activity spaces, green spaces and walkways.

District Character
• Enhance the Districts physical layout.
•
ES tablish Millennium Centre as a premier and self-sufficient entertainment venue.

Managing Land Use for the Future 6-27

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Infrastructure and Aesthetics
• Ensure the infrastructure is maintained.
■
Enhance the gateways and image intersections.
• Continue streetscape improvements.
• Encourage quality site landscaping.
•
Promote a more user-friendly parking system.
■
Enhance and improve safety and security.
• Improve and enhance transit amenities and investigate a trolley system between City Centre and the District.
Development and Redevelopment
■
Support Providence Hospital, Oakland Community College and Northland Center investments in the District.
■
Accomplish the reuse or redevelopment of the Ramada Inn and site as a mixed use " town and gown" area.
■
Enhance the economic viability of the 8 Mile area.
Economic Health and Vitality
■
Use the economic development tools to promote the District's economy.
• Enhance the human capital of the District.
■
Improve the public's perception of the District and reinforce that it is a good place to do business.
■
Effectively coordinate and administer the Plan .

Map S: Concept Master Plan
lmag t: Imcr:,t.:ction

Map prepared by Mc Kenna Associates

Southfield
/

*

Gat e,;;a&gt;
Po tent,.d Rcde,dopm&lt;.i

1

~i

L

Coru 1::ct1on

Managing land Use for the Future 6-28

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

7

Natural and Cultural
Resources

Goals
• Regard land as an irreplaceable
resource and ensure that its use does
not impair its value for future
generations.
• Preserve cultural resources, including
landscapes to maintain and enrich
community character.
• Balance the City's need for economic
growth and environmental health through
sustainable use of natural resources.
• Develop a fundamental vision for the arts
and cultural life of the City through
development of a Cultural Arts Plan.

Current Conditions
Southfield is an international City bustling with
people from a rich array of cultural, racial, ethnic and
religious backgrounds. Growing up in such an
international environment helps make Southfield
children "globally prepared," (i.e. knowledgeable
about cultures, customs and traditions).
Some of Southfield's most recognizable landmarks
demonstrate the City's diversity, from the golddomed St. John's Armenian church to the landmark
edifice of Congregation Shaarey Zedek synagogue,
all among the most beautiful religious architecture in
the metro area.

Historic and Cultural Sites Analysis
The Burgh Historic Park/District. Since the
development of the gazebo and fountain courtyards
and the relocation and renovation of the 1854
Church, the Burgh site has become very popular for
both public and private events. The Burgh Historical
Park is one of Southfield's hidden gems. Located on
the northeast comer of Civic Center Drive and Berg
Road, the park features renovated tum of the century
buildings nestled within beautiful manicured lawns
and abundant flower gardens offering a perfect
escape from the hustle and bustle of the City. An
extensive site master plan was recently completed,
including:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Sitework around the Park's House
Renovation of the Park's House
Renovation and expansion of the Art Center
Renovation of the Simmons House
Site signage program
Replace and expand parking lot with permeable
pavement
Enclose dumpster
Development of the east side of site
Carousel and related site work
Expanded flower gardens
Conservatory
Second parking lot
Croquet Court
Outdoor dinning terrace
Arbor

Southfield Historical Society. The Southfield
Historical Society was established in 1965 for the
purpose of encouraging the preservation of records,
pictures, structures, and other objects of local
historical significance, as well as sponsoring
programs to carry out these purposes.
The Historical Museum has a collection of artifacts
donated by citizens of the City and other benefactors.
The museum does not have a library; however, they
have pamphlets, maps, photographs and old
newspapers relating to Southfield's early people and
events. These offer significant information about
local architecture and geography, early settlers, town
sites and businesses. The Southfield Historical
Society should consider developing a public
education program to interpret the City's historic
resources to the community.
Natural and Cultural Resources 7-1

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

The Southfield Historical Society conducts tours of
the Burgh Historical Park. Tours of the Burgh are
arranged by appointment only. The tour includes:

as memorials for a nominal fee. This division is also
responsible for maintaining all trees on City rights-ofway.

•
•

The Southfield Forestry Division is responsible for the
care, maintenance and removal, if necessary, of all
vegetation in rights-of-way. The Division staff also
includes trained arborists and horticulturists that are
able to answer most citizen tree and landscape
questions.

•
•

The Old Town Hall
The Historical Museum (on the state registry of
historic buildings)
The first Fire Station in Southfield
A walk around the Burgh site

The Society also encourages tours of the Mary
Thompson House and Farm.

Code House. The Code House is considered to be one
of the finest examples of Greek Revival architecture in
Oakland County. The Code House was restored a few
years ago. It could be converted for lease to a small
business or for group use for private meetings and
events. Parking facilities would also be required. The
balance of the site could be developed as a passive use
neighborhood park complimentary to the Burgh site as
well as Civic Center Drive's high level of pedestrian
use.
Mary Thompson Farm. The Southfield Historical
Society occasionally opens the house for public tours
and displays furniture and artifacts of Mary
Thompson's life. Senior community gardens on the
property continue to remain popular. The Senior
Gardens at the Mary Thompson Farm provide plots to
more than one hundred enthusiastic gardeners who
offer tours to school and scouting groups. The Senior
Gardens have been recognized as one of the best
community gardens in the nation by the John Deere
Company and have received numerous awards from
the Michigan State Fair. The house is now home to the
Southfield Community Foundation which provides a
daily presence to the property.

Natural Resources
Parks, Forestry and Environmental Programs. The
Parks, Forestry and Environmental Division is
responsible for all park maintenance and forestry
operations and is involved in a number of
beautification and environmental improvement
programs for the City.
Forestry Programs. The City offers, at cost, a tree
planting program for Southfield residents. Trees are
purchased for either spring or fall planting by the City
forester and delivered to the homeowner for planting.
For an additional fee, crews wilJ plant the tree for the
resident on the City's rights-of-way. The Tree
Memorial program alJows residents to dedicate trees

Rouge Green Corridor Programs. The City and the
community continues to be involved in the annual
Rouge Green Corridor cleanup along with corporate
volunteers, removing debris and clearing log jams to
keep the river flowing freely. Each spring Parks and
Recreation holds a Fishing Derby that allows a sport
fishing opportunity in an urban environment.
Meandering through the southeast corner of Oakland
County, the main branch of the Rouge Green
Corridor paints a green band through neighborhoods
and business districts in the west side of the City.
See following Map 7-1. Over the past 15 years,
efforts at improving the river's water quality have
paid off, inspiring a regional environmental planning
effort - the Rouge Green Corridor. This segment of
the Rouge Green Corridor, and its tributaries, runs
through Birmingham, Beverly Hills and Southfield.
Improving residents' awareness of the Rouge Green
Corridor is one way of helping everyone see the
value that the Corridor and its tributaries contribute
to our daily lives.
The purpose of this project is to provide local
communities with tools to identify and facilitate the
promotion, protection and enhancement of "Riparian
Green Corridors" as unique community assets in the
Rouge Green Corridor watershed and throughout
watersheds in Southeast Michigan. The project is part
of a larger partner-based initiative that includes the
cities of Birmingham, Beverly Hills, and Southfield;
the Southeast Oakland County Water Authority;
Oakland County Planning &amp; Economic Development
Services; Oakland County Drain Commissioner's
Office; Friends of the Rouge; and the Oakland Land
Conservancy.

Environmental Programs. The Parks, Forestry and
Environmental Division are involved with island
beautification, special planting projects and working
with residents on home planting projects. In the spring
months, this division holds the City's Arbor Day
festivities by working with local schools and the
annual Fishing Derby on the Rouge Green Corridor.

Natural and Cultural Resources 7-2

�Map 7-1: Natural Features
13 Mile Road

Southfield Comprehensive Plan

24

r-----

------------------------

JOHN

ILLER

BEDFO D WOODS

•I
I
I

----•

12 Mile Road

Legend

I

..... --.
,.-___
_

I

,-J

I
I

SI

I

I
I
I
I
I

-----·

1

S

0

C:

,-+

::r

City Limits

Roads

(/)

=,

:

(I)

TALPAPAR

(I)

a:

;;o

0:
:;o

Interstate/Freeway

0

Major Road

Q)

a..

0

Q)

a..

Local Road

11 Mile Road

Private Road

0:2,

FEMA Floodplains
Waterbodies

•
-

O

0.25

Wetlands
Parks

0.5

1

,-c::::111.:::=i••••-

Miles

Data Sources:
City of Southfield
MCGI

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

8

Parks, Open Space and
Recreation

Goals
Beech Woods Park and Recreation Center

• Existing park and recreation facilities will
be enhanced and expanded as needed
to meet the evolving interests and needs
of Southfield residents.
• Southfield will have a unified communitybased open space system that protects
key natural features and provides
valuable opportunities for appreciation of
the City's natural resources.
• The City of Southfield will offer a variety
of recreation programs and events that
promote a high quality of life and
encourage interaction of its residents.

Current Conditions
City Facilities. The city of Southfield contains
nearly 800 acres of parks and natural open space.
The majority of this land is included in community or
neighborhood parkland or historical sites, with the
remaining acres categorized as open space and
undeveloped parklands. Many of the parklands are
nature preserves or incorporate significant areas of
open space. These sites total nearly 400 acres. Other
parkland (386.24 acres) is developed as community
parks, and just under 84 acres is dedicated to
neighborhood parks and recreation centers. All
parkland and open space are depicted on Map 8-1 .
Table 8-1 identifies the acreages of parkland and
open space by category, as further described on the
following pages.

81.38

Civic Center Park

157.00

Inglenook Park

42.79
Total

Bedford Woods Park

281.17

14.71

Brace Park (Lease)

4.01

Cit Centre Plaza (Ri ht of wa )

0.72

Civic Center Drive Park

2.18

Eleven Mile/Greenfield Park

0.66
0.73

Freeway Park (Right of way)

9 .00

John Grace Park and Recreation Center

4.61

John R. Miller Park

8.79

Lahser Woods Park

15 .80

Pebble Creek Park

16.27

Robbie Gage Park

16.97

Seminole Street Park

0.63

Simms Park

4.05

Stratford Woods Commons

5.29

Nature Preserves
Bauervic Woods

80.45

Ca enter Lake

42.36

Horsetail Woods

22.60

Hunters Lane Woods

22.31

23 .70

Industrial Park

3.11

Lincoln Woods

10.27

Valle Woods

128.38

Total

333.18

Total Parkland and Oprn Spacr

7MU7

* Historic and Cultural Sites are discussed in Chapter 7.
Source: City of Southfield Parks and Recreation Department,
LSL Planning

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-1

�--Map 8-1: Parks &amp; Open Space
Southfield Comprehensive Plan

-0

0::

Community Parks

II
II
II
II

J
12 Mile Rd

'I

[" ' "' -- -·----· - -

·-- --·---- ..

!
I

j

i◄

-

c

Cl)
Cl)

c5

I

j

i,,,

20

~

~

:er•=r -

..

··------------------j

17

3, CIVIC CENTER
4, INGLENOOK

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
11

13, ROBBIE GAGE

•

14, SEMINOLE STREET PARKLET

11
11

15, SIMMS PARK

5, BEDFORD WOODS
6, BRACE PARK
7, CITY CENTRE PLAZA
8, FREEWAY PARK
9, JOHN GRACE PARK &amp; RECREATION CENTER
10, JOHN R MILLER PARK
11 , LAHSERWOODS PARK
12, PEBBLE CREEK PARK

16, STRATFORD WOODS COMMONS

Historical &amp; Cultural Sites

j

i
i
l
i
l
i
!

i
i .

19

2, CATALPA PARK

Neighborhood Parks &amp; Recreation Centers

i

!
i
!
l
i

1, BEECH WOODS

17, CODE HOUSE

18
1JM

18, PIONEER CEMETERY

ePj

iJJ

24

19, SOUTHFIELD CEMETERY
-0

20, THE BURGH HISTORIC PARK

0::

-0

Q)

21 , MARY THOMPSON FARM

.;:::

.c:

::i

Nature Preserves

0

en

22, BAUERVIC WOODS NATURE PRESERVE

i
!
i

23, BRIDGE STREET NATURE PRESERVE
24, CARPENTER LAKE NATURE PRESERVE

Text

25, HORSETAIL WOODS
•

26, HUNTERS LANE WOODS
28, LINCOLN WOODS NATURE PRESERVE

"O

0::
..c

29, VALLEY WOODS NATURE PRESERVE

a.

-,

e
Ol

?!

i

I

Cl)

iI

~

C,

g

--

!

25

!
~
23
j
/
Rd ___ ______
.. ----·--·--··--·-··--·----··-··--·--·--·-· -----·--·-.----------------·-··-··-·--·--··--·--·--·-····-8 Mile
. - ·--

~

r

i

-·-··-··

----------··----··-··-·---·--·--------

i

-- - .1

O

0.25

0.5
Miles

1 inch equals 3,000 feet

□

.
LSL Planning, I~
eommu11,o-

,,,_.,,,co,u.;m,no

~J:rt,~2!!
Data Sources: MCGI,
City of Southfield

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Parkland. The city of Southfield classifies its
parklands into four categories as follows:
Community Parks - Community parks of at
least 40 acres in size are intended to provide the
entire community with leisure opportunities. As
shown in Table 8-2, Southfield' s community
parks contain a wide variety of recreational
facilities to meet the diverse needs of all
residents. Some parks include larger natural
areas, while others contain such improvements as
parking and areas for both active and passive
recreation.
Neighborhood Parks and Recreation Centers
Neighborhood parks, less than 40 acres in size,
are typically multi-purpose facilities which serve
as the focus of recreation for their more
proximate neighborhood. Table 8-3 shows these
facilities include an array of amenities including
small parking areas, playlots, seating and picnic
facilities, and athletic facilities such as ballfields
or basketball courts.
Historic and Cultural Sites - Southfield's
historic and cultural sites are primarily used for
passive activities and specialized recreation such
as the gazebo concert series and senior gardens.
These facilities are specifically described in
Chapter 7 Natural and Cultural Resources.
Nature Preserves - In addition to the 385 plus
acres of open space contained in the community
and neighborhood parks, the City owns an
additional 333 acres of natural open space,
contained in eight natural preserves. Table 8-4
summarizes the trail and parking amenities
available at each of these parks. In all, eight
nature preserves exist to provide additional
natural open space for resident's enjoyment.
Much of the City's open space is found in the
Valley Woods Nature Preserve, which follows

Southfield

Bauervic Woods

y

18 gr

Playlot, Picnic Area
with 10 tables &amp; 4 grills

y

42 pv

Accessible Fishing
Platforms, Interpretive
Si nage

Bridge Street
Carpenter Lake
Horsetail Woods
Hunters Lane Woods
Industrial Park
Lincoln Woods

Y

Valley Woods

Y

Total

3

Urban Fishery Project

18 gr
42 V

Source: City of Southfield Parks and Recreation Department and
LSL Planning

the Main Branch of the Rouge River. The City
has been proactive in obtaining environmentally
sensitive lands along this corridor and
throughout Southfield. The City is a partner in
the Rouge Green Corridor project. This project
focuses on developing a multi-community
management plan for preserving and protecting
the natural river green way of the main branch of
the Rouge River through Southfield, Beverly
Hills and Birmingham and for educating the
public about the resource and its importance for
recreation and water quality in the region.

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-2

�__:_9)_ _ _ _ _ _ __

Beech Woods Park &amp;
Recreation Center

I

-

I

-

I

I

I

-

I

-

I

-

I

300pv

Catalpa Park

I

-

I

2

I

-

I

-

I

-

I

-

I

168 gr

I

City of Southfield Comprehensive .Mast

I shelter
21 tables
I grill

y

-

-

-

-

-

6

y

4

-

I

I

I

Civic Center Park

I

I

Inglenook Park

I

I

2

1

I

4

I

I

I

1

I

I

I

3

I

I I in I y

I

I

I

216 pv

I

I

Sports Arena, Field House/Gym, Locker
Rooms, Meeting Room, Snack Bar,
Wellness Center, Pro-Shop, 75 Lighted Tee
Driving Range

-

I

I 1,036 pv

I

I

n

Miracle Field, Spray Pool, Water Slide,

I Parks &amp; Rec Building, Admin. Offices,

I shelter
48 tables
6 grills

I

15 tables

I

y

y

I
y

I

I
y

I

I - I

o~t

I

-

I

5

7

I
-

I

I
y

Multi-Purpose Rooms, Meeting Rooms,
Exhibition Hall, Wood Shop, Mechanic
Area, Sports Arena, Locker Rooms, Snack
Bar, Pro-Shop, Commercial Kitchen, Plaza

I - I Concession Building, Miller Barn

Source: City of Southfield Parks and Recreation Department and LSL Planning

S0utl'}field~
t , ,,/,
f,;•r

11/l:'

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-3

�_.

•

Bedford Woods Park

I

I

I

12s gr

Brace Park

2
-

-

-

29 pv

-

City Centre Plaza

-

I

6 tables
I grill

I

-

City of Southfield Comprehensive Mas~ ,

y

I

I

I

I

I

I
I

3

I

I

n

y

I Festival Plaza

I

Civic Center Drive Park
Eleven Mile/Greenfield Park
Ever reen/1-696 Park
Freeway Park
John Grace Park &amp; Recreation Center

l

John R. Miller Park

2

I

Lahser Woods Park

Seminole Street Park

I

I

I

I

Simms Park

I

Stratford Woods Commons

I

I

51 pv

1

86pv

1

Pedestrian Plaza, Seating,
Gardens
Rec. Center, Library, MultiPu ose Room, Meeting Rooms

y
4 tables
3 grills

I 15 gr

I

J shelter
84 pv I 20 tables
I gtill
I

I

y

12 tables

I

Pebble Creek Park
Robbie Gage Park

I

y

y

17 pv

I

I

I

I

I

l shelter
4 tables
1 grill

I

I

I

I

7 tables

y

I
I

y

I

y

I

y

I

I

I

y

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

1

I
I

I

y

I

y

I

, r
l

Source: City of Southfield Parks and Recreation Department and LSL Planning

50uthfield
:,7·'•
1lr:"c,,11,,

11

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Educational Facilities
Public. A significant portion of public recreation
and open space in Southfield is provided by school
sites. The Southfield Public School district has 15
school properties, totaling more than 245 acres,
within the cities of Southfield or Lathrup Village.
These facilities serve the enrolled student population
and supplement the broader range of public
recreational opportunities provided by the City.
In addition to the physical grounds, Southfield
Community Education, a part of Southfield Public
Schools, offers area residents a number of
educational and enrichment programs.

Private. Twelve private schools located in
Southfield provide varying levels of recreational
facilities . Typical recreational facilities include play
lots, athletic facilities , and open space for their
students.
Colleges. The Lawrence Technological University
Campus and Oakland Community College' s
Southfield campus, provide a variety of recreation
facilities including an athletics building, tennis courts
and softball diamonds. Facilities are reserved for
students and faculty.
Private Facilities
The private sector addresses more regional recreation
needs of the population.

Commercial. Commercial recreational facilities are
generally open to the public, but typically charge fees
for use and/or membership and are not accessible to
all residents. Also, in contrast to City or school
facilities, commercial recreation resources serve
customers from areas beyond Southfield. Private
commercial recreation facilities in Southfield include:
Bowling. Plum Hollow Lanes, Southfield Bowl
Entertainment. Star Theater, Millennium
Theater (City-owned), Jeepers (Indoor
amusement park and arcade at Northland)
Exercise and Athletic Clubs. Baily's, Curves,
Fitness Factory, Franklin Athletic Club , Fitness
USA Supercenters, Grunt Personal Training
Studio, It Figures of Southfield, Powerhouse
Gym
Golf. Plum Hollow Golf Course (Private)
Swim Clubs. Cranbrook Swim Club, Village
Swim Club (Lathrup Village)

Multiple-Family Residential Complexes. The
majority of multiple-family complexes, including
rental apartments, townhouses and condominiums,
provide their tenants and owners with on-site
recreational facilities. Swimming pools, clubhouses,
fitness centers and weight rooms, tot lots, tennis
courts or on-site natural open space may be provided.
Facilities in these complexes are not available to the
general public. These recreational facilities are
important because they provide recreational
opportunities within close proximity to the
population residing in the complexes. In addition,
these facilities supplement municipal recreation
resources in the vicinity.
Nature Preserves. The city of Southfield
encourages environmentally sensitive design for new
projects being built in Southfield. A premiere
example of privately developed nature preservation is
located just north of Eleven Mile within the
American Commerce Center. The office
development features a boardwalk over protected
wetlands and interpretive nature signage which is
open to the public.
Regional Facilities
Regional parks offer unique natural features that are
particularly suited for outdoor recreation, such as
wildlife viewing and nature study, fishing , boating,
hiking and trail use. Many also include active play
areas such as ballfields or courts. There are several
regional recreational opportunities located within a
short drive of Southfield, provided by Oakland
County, Wayne County, the Huron-Clinton
Metropolitan Authority, the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources and other sources.

Oakland County Park Facilities. Since 1966, more
than 6,000 acres of land have been acquired by the
Oakland County Park System with assistance from
state and federal governments. To date, there are 11
County parks which range in size from 125 acres to
1,088 acres. Only Glen Oaks, Red Oaks and Lyon
Oaks are located in the southern half of the County;
however, Southfield is conveniently situated within a
short drive of the following facilities:
Glen Oaks (Farmington Hills)
Lyon Oaks (west of Wixom)
Red Oaks (Madison Heights)
Waterford Oaks (northwest of Pontiac)
White Lake Oaks (White Lake Twp.)

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-5

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Wayne County Park Facilities. The Wayne County
Park System has more than 7,500 acres of public
recreation land throughout 10 parks. The Wayne
County parks listed below are conveniently located
within a short distance of Southfield; and provide
athletic fields, golf courses, swimming pools, trails,
playgrounds and picnic shelters.
Bell Creek (Redford Township)
Chandler Park Family Aquatic Center (Detroit)
Hines Park (Northville to Detroit)
Inkster Valley Golf Course (Inkster)
Lola Valley (Redford Township)
Lower Rouge Parkway (Inkster)
Warren Valley Golf Course (Dearborn Heights)
William P. Holliday Forest and Wildlife
Preserve (Westland)

Other Regional Opportunities. Several other
recreational facilities exist throughout the region,
most of which are provided by the state of Michigan
or the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority. The
parks provide a full range of recreational and
educational opportunities, including playgrounds,
picnicking, hiking, golf, biking, winter sports, golf,
water-related activities, camping, boating, hunting,
fishing, skiing, horseback riding, and special
programs.
Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority
Facilities . The Huron-Clinton Metropolitan
Authority (HCMA) is a regional park district that
encompasses the counties of Wayne, Oakland,
Macomb, Washtenaw and Livingston. The
HCMA regional parks located within a short
drive of Southfield include Huron Meadows
Metropark (Brighton), Indian Springs Metropark
(White Lake), and Kensington Metropark
(Milford Twp.).

the citizens of Southfield and the surrounding
areas. The state parks in the region include
Dodge No. 4 State Park (Waterford), Highland
Recreation Area (White Lake), Island Lake
Recreation Area (Brighton), Maybury State Park.
(Northville), Michigan State Fairgrounds
(Detroit), Pontiac Lake Recreation Area
(Waterford), and Proud Lake Recreation Area
(Wixom).

Programming
Southfield Parks and Recreation offers more than
1,000 different classes, programs and special events
for people of all ages and interests throughout the
year. Athletics, cultural arts, and senior citizen
programming represent major components of
Southfield's offerings.
The types of activities currently offered include:

Adult Programs. Arts, athletics, dance classes,
fitness, special interest classes.
Children's Activities. After school drop-in, arts
and crafts, athletics, dance classes, martial arts,
school break activities and specialty camps.
Concerts, Plays and More. Eat to the Beat
Lunchtime Concerts, Kids Koncerts Series,
Metropolitan Singers, Smooth Jazz Festival (cosponsor), SRO Productions.
Fun for All Ages. Classes and athletics.
Senior Programs. Art, athletics, dance, fitness
and trips.
Special Events. Arbor Day, Boo at the Burgh,
Daddy-Daughter and Mother-Son Dances,
EGGS'travaganza, Family Pool Parties, Fishing
Derby, Holiday Tree Lighting, Movie Night at
the Pool, Native American Festival &amp; Mini PowWow, Snow Drop/Ride with Santa, Star
Spangled Southfield Festival, Teen Jam and
Therapeutic Halloween Party.
Sports. Baseball, basketball, cheerleading,
football, golf, figure skating, hockey, soccer,
softball, swimming and tennis.
More than 300,000 people attend Southfieldsponsored or co-sponsored events annually. The vast
majority of these events take place on the Civic
Center site, either in the Pavilion, at the ballfields or
the arena and pool. Other locations include Beech
Woods, Mary Thompson Farm and the Burgh site.

Michigan State Facilities. There are several
Michigan State Parks in southeast Michigan
totaling more than 55,000 acres of recreational
lands that provide recreational opportunities to

Many public events are also held at the Pavilion,
which are sponsored by outside groups and
organizations including art exhibits, antique shows
and international festivals, as well as trade shows and
business meetings.

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-6

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Sidewalks and Multi-Use Pathways
A comprehensive pathway system adds to the overall
quality of life for residents
by providing access to
various community
facilities and parks and by
offering a source of
recreation for residents that
bike, jog or walk. Chapter
9 Transportation and
Circulation details the type
and location of pathways
that currently exist or are
proposed to be provided in
the future.
In addition to the City,
Oakland County envisions
an interconnected trail system throughout the region
for enjoyment of outdoor and fitness activities . The
County Parks and Recreation and the Oakland Trails
Advisory Council are teaming up to expand and
coordinate a network of trails.

Recommendations
The City will prepare an update to its Parks and
Recreation Master Plan following adoption of this
Plan. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan guides
future improvements, investments and changes to
parks and recreation in the City. The development of
the updated Parks and Recreation Plan should build
upon the goals and recommendations of this Plan.

Park and Facilities Analysis
Increased development and higher than normal use
levels due to Southfield's location within the
metropolitan area puts a high demand on the City' s
park resources. Currently, the City maintains nearly
800 acres of parks and natural open space. Where
possible, the City should continue to acquire property
according to the criteria of the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan. The City should also continue to
modernize and update existing facilities and
maximize the use of existing parkland.
The City has a both a large number and wide variety
of recreation facilities to meet the diverse needs of
residents. Based on local demand, additional
facilities have been identified that would best serve
City residents as follows:

Playgrounds. Southfield is recognized for high
quality playgrounds. New or renovated playgrounds
could be located at several existing parks to help
alleviate any deficiencies. Many play areas have been
replaced and upgraded in recent years. A few
neighborhood parks are scheduled for upgrades
within the next few years.
Pathways. As the popularity of jogging, hiking,
cycling and rollerblading increases, so does the
demand for multi-modal pathways. Add ttional onand off-street pathways are needed to create a
comprehensive system in the City. Refer to Chapter
9 Transportation and Circulation for pathway
recommendations.
Sports Fields. There is a demand to light fields for
fall sports such as flag football. Currently
participants are forced to go to the adjacent
community of Oak Park to meet this need.
Softball Fields. While the number of softball fields
is sufficient to meet demand, the City only has one
lighted field and annual1y turns teams away. The
City needs to increase the mount of lighted fields that
are available.
Basketball Courts. Indoor basketball courts have
been successful at Beech Woods Arena. The addition
of outdoor basketball courts are considered where
they do not conflict with other uses.
Volleyball Courts. The growing sport of sand
volleyball has increased demand for this amenity,
particularly at picnic areas and neighborhood parks.
An increase in the number of courts at the Civic
Center and other neighborhood locations will help to
meet this demand.
Soccer Fields. The increasing popularity of soccer
has caused increased demand for the number of
fields. The City is able to adequately handle the
current demand for soccer due to the number of fields
at various schools and at Catalpa Oaks and Miller
parks.
Swimming Pools. The City has no indoor pool
available for year-round use and offers little in the
way of family water-play activities. The pools at the
two high schools have limited availability for general
public use and have accessibility problems. None of
the pools in the City meet new competitive standards.
The development of a modem indoor pool at one of
the community center locations should be
investigated.

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-7

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•

Park Improvements
Each park in the Southfield system has a different
level of development, from the extensive level of
development of Civic Center or Freeway Park to the
minimal development of Valley Woods Nature
Preserve. Many parks such as Lahser Woods or
Miller, were developed many years ago. They are
now in need of redevelopment. Because the parks
vary considerably, it is necessary to look at each one
individually to identify specific items for park
improvement. All new park development should
feature sustainable or "green" design and operation.

•
•
•

Renovated parking and circulation with
permeable pavement and bioswales.
Improved site pathway system.
New landscaping, irrigation and site lighting.
New site furnishings.

Brace Park. Brace Park is a leased parcel from the
Southfield School District. As a result, there are no
plans to invest in capital improvements at this park.
Bridge Street Nature Preserve. Minor development
of trails and picnic tables along the river could be
developed for area residents and employees. The site
could also be used to pick-up canoes dropped off at
12 Mile Road.

Bauervic Woods Park. At 80 acres in size,
Bauervic Woods is one of the largest parks in
Southfield. Consisting almost entirely of woodlands
and wetlands, extensive recreation facility
development is precluded for this nature preserve. A
new concept park plan is required that should include
goals to:

Carpenter Lake Nature Preserve. The newest park
in the Southfield park system, Carpenter Lake opened
in 2008 with an interpretive trail system and viewing
and fishing platforms. Future plans for the park
include the development of a nature center.

•
•
•
•

Civic Center. The Civic Center is the primary parks
and recreation site for the City, as well as the center
for municipal government. Recent and anticipated
redevelopment of the Civic Center will result in
significant relocation and improvement of facilities .
Possible improvements to this site include:

•
•
•

Improve public access.
Expand and improve parking.
Expand picnic area with shelters.
Expand trail system with handicapped accessible
portion and interpretive and directional signage.
Improve park signage.
Install pathways along site frontage and to park
features.
Develop restroom facilities.

Bedford Woods Park. Future plans for the park
include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Renovate play area.
Pave parking Jots and trails.
Additional trail to north end of park.
Construct picnic shelter and picnic area.
Improve park signage.
Install sand volleyball court.
Renovate tennis courts.
Add park benches.
Develop new soccer fields .
Landscaping.

Beech Woods Park. Beech Woods Park is
extensively developed but is in need of major
redevelopment. A new concept park plan has been
developed which features sustainable design that
includes:
•
•

Expanded picnic area.
Improved park signage.

(§outhfield

•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

New community center including indoor pool
and aquatic center.
Enhancements to the ice arena .
Relocation of the Parks and Recreation
administrative offices.
Miracle Field.
Tennis center/restroom building .
Wildlife habitat demonstration area, picnic area
and trail development at pond.
Improvements to the site pathway system
Interpretive nature trails in preserve area .
Improve the picnic area .
Improved and lighted ballfields .
Play area renovation .

Freeway Park. Freeway Park is a passive-use park
built as part of the I-696 freeway construction to
provide for pedestrian circulation across the highway .
Improvements planned for Freeway Park include:

•
•

Overall modernization of site including new
seating, signage, landscaping and lighting.
New playground equipment with safety
surfacing.

Horsetail Woods Nature Preserve. Primarily a
nature preserve, the park is the only public open

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-8

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

space for residents along Berg Road just north of 8
Mile. A nature trail could be developed at this site in
the future. Additional land to the south would
encompass a larger natural area for preservation.

Hunters Lane Woods. Hunters Lane Woods is the
only parkland on Berg Road between 9 Mile and 10
Mile Roads but contains some floodplain property.
The site could be developed as a neighborhood park
in the future and include a smalJ picnic area,
playground and pathway system. Some consideration
should also be given to redesign the private road
which now bisects the property into a cul-de-sac
design, which requires agreement from the
neighborhood .
Inglenook Park. Inglenook Park is one of
Southfield's most popular parks. Opened in 1985 , the
park is in need of redevelopment including:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Improve picnic facilities.
Improved site pathway system .
Landscape improvements .
Improved park signage .
Redevelop fitness trail.
Site furnishings .
Lighting for ballfields.
Additional parking.
Ballfield shelter.

John Grace Community Park and Recreation
Center. Future improvements are limited to new
park signage.
John R. Miller Park. Goals for future
improvements are as follows:

•
•
•
•
•

New playground equipment.
Improve site pathway system.
Improve park signage .
Landscape.
Replace fencing around tennis courts and
neighborhood to the west.

Lahser Woods Park. Lahser Woods Park is a
relatively old park which needs completely
redeveloped. Including:

Lincoln Woods Nature Preserve. The City should
coordinate development of this site with the adjacent
elementary and junior high schools to develop an
environmental education program and interpretive
trail system. MDOT developed a wet prairie habitat
and pond on both Lincoln Woods and MDOT
property to the east which features re-created native
grass habitats. This MDOT property will ultimately
be incorporated into Lincoln Woods and is currently
under City management. The interpretive trail
system would allow public access to a u Jique and a
sensitive environment after a five-year establishment
period.
Pebble Creek Park. This would also be a good
location for installation of a sand volleyball court as a
companion facility with the picnic area. The
playground is in poor condition and does not meet
current standards for accessibility and needs to be
replaced. Supplemental tree planting, particularly
mature trees in the picnic area, should also be
planned. The newly opened American Drive exit
ramp from I-696 caused the relocation of the park's
entrance; therefore, improved signage and access is
needed.
Robbie Gage Park. Robbie Gage Park is currently
undeveloped. Future enhancements are planned for
neighborhood use including:

•
•
•
•
•

Seminole Street Park. Seminole Park's play
equipment is in need of replacement. Park signage is
also recommended at this park .
Simms Park. Simms Park could benefit from new
tot lot play equipment.
Stratford Woods Commons. Primarily a passive
use park with a walkway through the center, this site
requires updating to include:

•

•
•
•
•
•
•

Pave parking lot.
Improve site pathway system.
Landscape improvement package.
Park benches.
Improve park signage.
Renovate tennis court.

New playground equipment.
Parking lot.
Picnic area .
Trails .
Park signage .

•
•
•
•

Replace playground to ADA and CPSC
standards .
Improve site pathway system .
Improve park signage .
Landscaping and drainage improvements .
Site furnishings .

Valley Woods. Valley Woods is one of Southfield' s
most significant properties. A linear park, the first

S0uthfield

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-9

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

phase of trail development along the Rouge Green
Corridor was completed in 1995. Future plans
include a trail system to be developed along the
banks of the Rouge Green Corridor from 10 Mile to
12 Mile Road. A proposed canoe drop at 12 Mile
with pick ups at 10 Mile and again at 8 Mile Roads
would provide unique recreational opportunities in
the City on a seasonal basis. Fish habitat
improvements and stream bank erosion reparations,
which run from Telegraph Road to I-696, should be
extended through the river's length to improve water
quality and fishing opportunities for Southfield
residents. There is also a need for better pedestrian
access from Civic Center Drive.

Land Acquisition
Southfield is a highly developed community with
relatively little vacant land. Much of the vacant land
is suitable only for limited recreational development
due to a high incidence of wetlands, floodplain or
mature woodlands. Vacant land should be
investigated by the city of Southfield to maintain a
comprehensive open space system and develop active
parks in underserved neighborhoods. The City
should continue to acquire land along the Rouge
River and its tributaries.

•

•

•

•
•

Oakland County should be considered for
acquisition whenever they become available.
Property south of Horsetail Woods which is
environmentally sensitive and on the Evans
Branch of the Rouge Green Corridor.
Property along the Rouge Green Corridor,
particularly that which is contiguous to Valley
Woods.
Property at the rear portion of the WXYT
property. It is the only Southfield property
identified as significant on the Mid1igan Natural
Feature Inventory listed with the Natural
Conservancy.
Acquisitions of property contiguous to existing
parkland, school sites or portions thereof.
Properties which possess significant natural
resource and scenic values such as wetlands,
mature woodlands, and floodplains. Each
property would be evaluated individually for
quality and suitability for parkland.

The Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund has
been the primary source of a11 acquisitions in the past
along with landowner donation of local match
requirements; however, other sources of funding will
continue to be sought.
As an alternative to acquiring the additional
properties, the City should consider the use of
conservation easements with access. This ensures the
long term preservation of natural features and open
space, while providing recreational access through
pathways or nature trails.
The following is a list of acquisition proposals; some
specific, some general, which represent the Parks and
Recreation Department's priorities for land
acquisition. The program is intended to be flexible
and is dependent on the property owner's willingness
to sell to the City and in most situations wait for
outside funding to become available.

•
•

Properties suitable for neighborhood or
community park development in Sections 20, 21,
26, 27, 29 and 35.
Large parcels along the Rouge Green Corridor
with significant natural features as identified in
the Green Infrastructure Plan prepared by

~pythfield.

Parks, Open Space and Recreation 8-10

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Transportation and
Circulation
Goals
• Maintain and improve safety and efficiency in
the transportation system to support
Comprehensive Master Plan goals, land use
patterns and ensure that Southfield remains
an attractiye place to live, work, learn, play
and visit.
• Improve the visual appearance of the City
through street and related improvements.

Increasing strain on funding makes improving the
transportation system increasingly difficult and
increases pressure for cost-effective decisions.
Concepts such as access management, advanced
traffic signal technology, interchange/driveway
redesign, and public education are cost-effective
methods that can contribute to congestic n reduction
and improved traffic flow.

• Provide a high-quality system that provides
safe and efficient access to all areas of the
community for all users.
• Provide alternatives to the automobile
through multi-modal transportation options
which connect neighborhoods, schools, the
library, businesses and other activity areas.

Introduction
In Southfield and communities across the country,
transportation is no longer just a way to serve the
needs of new development. Transportation
investments can act as a catalyst for desired
redevelopment of land uses. Reconstruction of a
roadway with elements such as medians, or combined
with the installation of a streetscape enhancement
system, can attract other quality development and
cause a resurgence in activity and economic
development and investment.

One goal of this plan is to provide a high-quality
system that provides safe and efficient access to all
areas of the community for a wide variety of users,
such as drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit
riders. Developing an efficient transportation system
that meets the needs of various users requires an
evaluation of existing conditions, needs and
opportunities. In particular, this Chapter focuses on
how changes to transportation can verify or support
other goals, such as the Future Land Use Plan.

A high-quality transportation system has supported
the growth and development of Southfield and will
remain a key ingredient in the City's future.
Southfield's location along several freeways has
attracted residents and businesses, making Southfield
the "Center of it All," but the configuration of
freeways favors traffic moving through the City and
does not provide convenient access to key
destinations in the City. The automobile is the
dominant mode of transportation and, thus, most
transportation planning efforts focus on improving
the street system for automobiles. However,
providing a "multi-modal" transportation system
(vehicles, pedestrian, bicyclist, and transit) provides
access for those citizens unable or unwilling to drive
such as seniors, children, and those who do not own a
car.

Current Conditions

~oythfield.

Access to transportation has been a key factor in
Southfield's land use development pattern. Southfield
has an established street system that includes a
hierarchy of streets from local residential streets to
high-capacity expressways. The expressways, such
as I-696, M-10, and M-39, provide access to the
primary transportation links in the Detroit metro area,
including I-96, I-94, I-75, and the region's airports.
The City's major commercial and cultural centers
such as the City Centre have located near
expressways, but navigating from the expressway to
destinations in the City is circuitous and confusing,
rather than clear and convenient. The expressways
provide access to other employment centers and
residential areas throughout the metro area but
primarily function to move traffic through the City.

Transportation and Circulation 9-1

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Street Jurisdiction
Design, construction, maintenance, and
improvements to the transportation system are
managed by a number of governmental bodies. The
Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) has
ultimate jurisdiction over many of the City's
interstates and U.S. Highway routes, which include I696 and US-24 (Telegraph Road). The Michigan
Department of Transportation (MDOT) administers
these highways for the FHW A and also has
jurisdiction over many of the City's other highest
volume roadways, including M-10 (Lodge Freeway
and Northwestern Highway), M-39 (Southfield
Freeway), and M-102 (8 Mile Road). Several major
streets are under the jurisdiction of the Road
Commission for Oakland County (IO Mile, 12 Mile,
Greenfield, Southfield, and Lahser Roads).
The remaining streets in Southfield are major, local,
and neighborhood streets under city jurisdiction (with
some streets on private property). While the majority
of Southfield's streets are under the City's
jurisdiction, the highest-capacity roadways are not.
This warrants proactive coordination with all
jurisdictions as being critical to achieve the City's
improvements to the transportation system.

Figure 9-1: Roadway Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction

-State

City

- C ounty

Private

such as daily and peak-hour traffic volume, capacity,
location in relation to other streets, and the primary
traffic served (through or local). The hierarchy
recognizes that certain streets are intended to
accommodate through traffic at higher speeds and
volumes while others are intended to handle local
traffic in smaller volumes and at lower speeds.
Southfield's streets are classified by MDOT into five
primary categories: Freeways, Principal Arterials,
Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets. These
classifications are summarized below ar.d Map 9-1
illustrates the current street classification.

Freeways. Freeways or expressways are designed to
carry very high volumes (70,000 - 183,000 vehicles
average per day) of through traffic over long
distances at high speeds. Freeways in Southfield
include I-696, M-10 east of 12 Mile Road
(Northwestern Highway &amp; Lodge Freeway), and M39 south of M-10 (Southfield Freeway).
Principal Arterials. Principal arterials are major
through streets that carry high traffic volumes
(20,000 -93,000 vehicles average per day) through
the City and to major local destinations at relatively
high speeds. These streets often link traffic to
freeways, providing local access to the regional
roadway system. Principal arterials typically have
five or more lanes or a median, and because of their
high traffic volumes often are fronted by commercial
and office uses. The traffic movements for theses
uses can conflict with the primary purpose of a
principal arterial to move through traffic. The
principal arterials in Southfield are:

Source: Michigan Department of Transportation

•

Street Classification

•

MDOT classifies streets according to the National
Functional Classification (NFC). Street classes are
generally designated based on a number of factors

Southfield

•
•
•

Telegraph Road (US-24)
8 Mile Road
12 Mile Road
Greenfield Road
Southfield Road (north of M-10)

Transportation and Circulation 9-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•

Northwestern Highway (M-10, west of
Telegraph Road)

Minor Arterials. Compared to the streets classified
above or below, minor arterials serve moderate traffic
volumes (10,000- 40,000 vehicles average per day)
over moderate lengths and are designed to
accommodate slower speeds than major arterials but
higher than local streets. Minor arterials often link
the major arterials. Minor arterials include:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Inkster Road
Lahser Road
Evergreen Road
9 Mile Road
10 Mile Road
13 Mile Road
Franklin Road
Civic Center Drive
11 Mi le Road (certain portions)

Collector Streets. Collectors are so defined because
these are streets that "collect" traffic from a series of
local streets and connect with the arterials.
Collectors may resemble local streets in appearance,
but they usually have a wider right-of-way, wider
pavement, and higher speed limits than local streets.
Southfield streets classified as collectors include:

•

•
•
•

•
•

Berg Road
Beck Road
Shiawassee Avenue
Central Park Drive
Lincoln A venue
Mount Vernon Avenue

Local Streets. The majority of streets in Southfield
are local streets. These streets connect individual
properties and homes to the larger transportation
system. Local streets are not intended to serve
through traffic. These streets include typical public
subdivision streets as well as certain private streets.
Maintenance, upkeep, and the eventual reconstruction
of the many private streets are the responsibility of
the individual or homeowners groups.
Traffic Operations
Most street improvements are intended to address a
capacity deficiency (high traffic volumes resulting in
excessive delay), a correctable crash pattern and/or a
need for road maintenance. This Plan includes a
long-range thoroughfare plan intended to address the
key needs of today, but also anticipate future needs as

land uses change and traffic volumes increase. Some
of the key data applicable to long-term thoroughfare
planning are listed below. Any maintenance, such as
repaving, is not part of this long-range plan, but
should be part of the city, county, and state on-going
capital improvement programs.

Traffic Counts. Traffic counts identify the most
heavily traveled roadways and the most common
routes to destinations. Map 9-1 shows the most
recent traffic count data from MDOT and the Road
Commission for Oakland County for the 20 most
heavily traveled street segments in Southfield. Not
surprisingly, I-696, M-10 (Lodge Freeway), M-39
(Southfield Freeway), Telegraph Road (US-24), and
Southfield Road are the most heavily traveled
roadways. These roadways are major regional
freeways that transport people through Southfield
from other suburbs to major employment centers in
Southfield and the rest of Southeastern Michigan.
Crashes. Crashes (traffic accidents) are one factor
used to identify where problems exist in the roadway
network. High crash locations, or the number of
crashes related to the volumes (a ratio), may indicate
the need for improvements especially where there is a
trend for a particular type of crash (e.g. rear-end
collision). Map 9-1 identifies intersections with the
highest number of crashes in 2005 and the average
number of crashes from 2001 to 2005. High crash
locations may indicate the need for improvements to
reduce the potential for crashes, such as intersection
widening, changes to signal timing, restrictions on
some turning movements, or changes to access along
the street. The top six highest crash locations, by
total number of reported crashes, are all located along
either Telegraph Road or Southfield Road. Mostly
due to the extremely high volumes of traffic on these
two Principal Arterials, the top location with over
100 crashes is Telegraph at 12 Mile Road, and the
next four highest are along Southfield at 13, 12, 10,
and 9 ½ Mile Roads, respectively.
Air Transportation
The Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport
(DTW) is located approximately 20 miles southwest
of Southfield. DTW provides commercial and
charter passenger links to destinations across the
nation and world and serves cargo airlines. DTW is a
major metropolitan airport and a hub for Northwest
Airlines. Proximity to a major airline hub makes
Southfield accessible from anywhere in the world for
business and pleasure trips. Smaller airports located
within 35 miles of Southfield serve charter and
freight flights, including Detroit City Airport,
Transportation and Circulation 9-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Oakland Troy Airport, Oakland County International
Airport in Waterford, and Willow Run Airport in
Ypsilanti.

Recommendations
Proper planning for the transportation system in
Southfield is important to provide proper access to
various destinations, but can also impact the safety of
travel.
The character of a street is dictated by both the
design and aesthetics of a corridor. Aesthetic
features such as streetscape elements and trees along
the street and parking location, building setbacks,
business signage, and building design outside of the
right-of-way also play an important role in the
function of a street. These factors must be integral to
the planning process as they often affect how people
use the transportation system.
It is important that area streets foster safe travel for
all modes (methods) of transportation and are easy to
navigate. As mentioned above, street design
elements in the City reinforce a desired image, and
can cause motorists to drive at certain speeds. For
example, residential streets should include design
elements that make drivers intuitively travel at a low
speed, and major commercial corridors should not be
excessively wide so as to encourage speeds in excess
of the posted limit. In many places in Southfield, the
street system is properly designed, while in other
cases, transportation improvements outlined in this
Plan need to be considered to meet the Plan' s goals.
This Plan relies on a range of approaches to help
ensure the future transportation system operates
safely and efficiently while staying within the context
of the character of the City.
The provision of alternative travel options can
improve traffic flow and safety by diverting
automobile traffic into other modes such as
pedestrian, bicycle, or public transit. These
alternatives must be attractive and cost-effective in
order to be relevant. This Plan identifies ways to
encourage use of altemati ve travel options to reduce
automobile traffic, provide access to transportation
for those without automobiles, and provide
recreational opportunities for all residents.
This Plan examines current and projected
transportation problems, including whether street
segments have traffic exceeding its capacity,
intersections that have long delays at peak periods
and the condition and age of the street. Based

~ o~thfield

primarily on this analysis, the Plan outlines street
expansion (additional lanes), intersection expansions,
and corridor improvement projects such as
reconstruction, adding a median, access management,
gateway improvements, and corridor enhancement.
In addition to traditional addition of lanes along a
street segment or at an intersection, alternative
roadway treatments and alternative intersection
treatments should be considered in unique
circumstances, including the following:
•

Street treatments
o Narrow Median
o Wide Median/Boulevard
o Road Diet (reduction in through
traffic lanes with provision of onstreet parking, bike lanes, and/or
median)

•

Intersection Treatments
o Roundabouts
o Dual Left-Turn Lanes
o Textured Pavement/Crosswalks

Traffic conditions, including crashes, delay, and
congestion, need to be monitored regularly to adjust
the prioritization of recommended projects in this
Plan.

7-lane to 4-lane boulevard conversion on Livernois
in Detroit, Ml
Standards for Street and Intersection
Improvements. Street capacity refers to the ability
of a roadway to accommodate expected traffic
volumes with an acceptable amount of travel delay.
Traffic engineers measure this capacity through a
comparison of the volume of traffic on the road
during the peak travel hour to the designed capacity
(the amount of traffic the road is designed to
accommodate). This comparison determines the

Transportation and Circulation 9-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

amount of congestion on the street, or the average
delay per vehicle, which is then translated into a
"level-of-service" rating that is indicated by a letter
grading system (from A to F) or a "volume-tocapacity ratio" (V/C). Streets and intersections with
current or projected poor traffic operations (usually
areas with a level of service D or below) should be
evaluated to determine any benefits of improvements.
Maintaining a level of service D or better for street
segments and intersections is the standard for the
City.
While opportunities may exist to expand roadways in
Southfield, this Plan promotes use of cost-effective
transportation and land use tools over more costly
projects.

Planned/Programmed Major Improvement
Projects. While some funds for maintenance and
minor improvement projects are provided by the state
and federal government directly to the City, major
improvements to the transportation system in
Southeast Michigan must be included in the
SEMCOG 25-year Regional Transportation Plan
(RTP). Placement on the RTP project listing is
required to secure federal funding, and requires
consistency with regional planning goals. The
highest priority projects are taken from the RTP and
added to short-term (5-years or sooner) regional and
state Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs),
where they are assigned funding. Once funded, the
projects can proceed. Projects that are not selected
for the RTP or TIP can still proceed, given initiative
and funding by the City and/or Road Commission for
Oakland County.
In addition to general resurfacing, reconstruction,
rehabilitation, road preservation and safety
improvement efforts funded by the city's and
county's share of federal funding, the following
projects are already listed on the SEMCOG RTP or
TIP:

Table 9-1: Planned Major Road Improvements
Roadway

Proposed
Work

Limits

Year

RTP Projects

Southfield
Road

9-1/2 Mile to
llMile

M-10 SB

Over Rouge
River

Southfield
Road

12 Mile to
13 Mile

9 Mile Road
Lahser Road
Lahser Road
Lahser Road

Beech to
Telegraph
JO Mile to
10-1/2 Mile
11 Mile to
12Mile
8-1/2 Mile to
9Mile

Widen from 5
Lanes to 6 Lane
Boulevard
Replace Bridge
Deck
Reconfigure
from 5 Lanes to
4 Lane
Boulevard
Widen from 2
to 3 Lanes
Widen from 2
to 5 Lanes
Widen from 4
to 5 Lanes
Widen from 2
to 5 Lanes

2011-2015
2006-2010
2006-2010,
2011-2015
2006-2010,
2016-2020
2021-2025
2021-2025
2021-2025

TIP Projects
13 Mile Rd

US-24
1-696
Southfield
Rd
US-24

Southfield to
Greenfield
J2Mile
Road to N.
of Quarton
EB&amp;WB
over Inkster
At 10 Mile
Rd&amp; 11
Mile Rd
8 Mile (M102) to 12
Mile Road

Resurface and
widen from 2 to
3 Lanes

2008

Patch &amp; overlay

2009 or later

Rehab bridge

2008

Upgrade signals
using box span
configuration

2008

Patch &amp; overlay

2008

Source: SEMCOG

Recommended Improvement and Enhancement
Projects. In addition to embracing the major planned
projects listed in the RTP and TIP, this Plan
recommends numerous transportation and land use
projects across the City to support Plan goals. These
projects, described in detail in the remainder of this
Chapter, fa]l under the following categories:

•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Access Management
Corridor Character
Gateways
Visual Corridors
Natural Corridors
Enhancement Corridors
Traffic Calming
Transit-Oriented Design
Transit Service
Non-Motorized Transportation

In addition to specific recommendations and
programs, the Plan also discusses implementation

"2outhfield

Transportation and Circulation 9-5

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

tools, including funding sources throughout the
Chapter.

Access Management. Numerous national and
statewide studies demonstrate that access
management can reduce the potential for crashes, and
help preserve the street' s ability to carry traffic.
Access management is a set of techniques used to
reduce the overall number of access points and
improve the spacing intervals between them,
especially in relation to access points across the street
and those close to signalized intersections. When
implemented, access management often significantly
reduces the number and likelihood of access-related
conflicts, improves traffic flow, and solidifies a
corridor's business sustainability and non-motorized
safety.

■
■

Location/spacing of traffic signals.
Shared access systems (connections between
land uses, shared driveways, frontage roads or
rear service drives) .

~;:.S:IT

- l I

..,

Access management involves tools to appropriately
space access points or restrict problematic turning
movements. These tools include the following:
■

■

■

■

Adequate spacing of access points along the
same side of the street.
Alignment or spacing from access points on the
opposite side of the street.
Placing commercial driveways a sufficient
distance from intersections to minimize impact
to intersection operations.
Geometric design such as channelized right turns
to restrict certain turning movements (usually
left turns) by use of a raised island,

~outhfielct~

I -

-

FRONTAGE ~OAD

J

:;,

~
.. L
·

r--

I

REAR SERVICE DRIVE

Southfield's formal
access management
program should build
upon widely accepted
best practices for access
management. A task
force of public and
private experts
developed the MDOT
"Access Management
Guidebook" to establish
the tools, techniques, and
standards used by MDOT on all roads under its
jurisdiction. A city-wide access management
ordinance should be established to establish specific
standards for access spacing and design applied in
every site plan review. The ordinance could also pull
in specific recommendations of other transportation
studies and access management corridor plans to
provide more specific guidance to the planning
commission or zoning board of appeals when making
access-related decisions.

r

l

PARKING LOT CROSS ACCESS

Rear service drives and shared driveways are
important techniques to reduce the number of access
points, especially near cross streets.

l·
l

•

t:===::::::I

I

I

"-:till

I

lc·h.1

I

:r

L-!::::::=::::-::::-fl

I!

UL IJ

",''!~
The success of different types of shared drives, roads,
and parking connections are dependent on lot depth,
building placement, and parking configuration.
Application of access management can provide
several benefits to motorists, land uses, and nonmotorists in the City. The fo11owing is a list of
benefits often resulting from aggressive access
management policies and specific access
management standards in City ordinance language.

Transportation and Circulation 9-6

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

■
■

■
■

■

■

■

■

■

Reduce crashes and crash potential.
Preserve or increase roadway capacity and the
useful life of roads.
Decrease travel time and congestion.
Improve access to and from properties.
Ensure reasonable access to properties (though
not necessarily direct access nor the number of
driveways preferred by the
landowner/developer).
Coordinate land use (site plan) and transportation
(access permit) decisions for projects that need
both city and MDOT or Road Commission for
Oakland County approval.
Improve environment for pedestrians and
bicyclists (fewer driveways to cross).
Improve air quality by reducing congestion and
delays.
Maintain travel efficiency and related economic
prosperity.

Based on factors including high volumes, crash
concentrations, congestion, and a proliferation of
poorly spaced driveways, several specific corridor
sections (illustrated on Map 9-2) have been identified
as having the greatest need for aggressive access
management. While this plan also recommends citywide access management standards in an ordinance,
these corridors require a proactive approach from the
City to improve access and ensure the City's
corridors remain vibrant as development and
redevelopment occur:
■
■
■

■
■
■

■

■

Both the specific recommendations in the Telegraph
and Southfield Road corridor subarea plans in this
Plan, and the standards in the city-wide ordinance,
will be implemented gradually and incrementally
over the next 10-20 years as redevelopment and
growth continues. Establishing these standards lays
the framework for better access related decisions and
will continue to benefit the City for years to come.
Corridor Character
Gateways and Portals. Intended to help in creating
identity for the community as a whole, as well as
each individual district, gateways and portals are
visual icons that are designed to attract attention and
portray an image or message.
Portals create district identity, form a sense of
belonging for those who visit or live there, and create
additional opportunities for aesthetic enhancement
around the community. The general principle is to
establish portals at entrances to and within the unique
districts whereby creating a theme/brand that can be
portrayed in the district's streetscape, gateway
markers, street and pedestrian lighting, etc. by using a
select style of materials, colors, placement, etc.
A 'gateway' is the entranceway to a city and creates
the initial visual impression about a city's character
and identity. Gateway corridors for Southfield have
been identified in order to prioritize enhancement
projects. These routes include the following:
•

Gateways. Based on traffic counts, functional
classification and other characteristics,
Southfield's primary gateways were identified.
Some of these locations lack unified, aesthetic
features and do little to distinguish Southfield
from other communities in the region. The
general principles used to establish formal
gateways include improvements to the roadways,
such as well designed landscaped medians and
landscaped freeway embankments, significant
entry monuments, upgraded lighting standards,
wayfinding signage and well-maintained and
attractive adjacent properties. See Map 12-1
Community Image Improvements for location of
Gateways.

•

Portals. These routes are important links into
the City or into major activity areas. Many of
these routes lack character and, similar to
gateways, design features and appearance along
these streets should reinforce the image of a
quality district. These portals can also provide
wayfinding information to destination points.

Telegraph Road/US-24
Southfield Road
Northwestern Highway/M-10, Inkster to 12 Mile
Road
11 Mile Road/Lahser Road intersection vicinity
Evergreen Road, 11 Mile Road to 10 Mile Road
10 Mile Road, Evergreen Road to Southfield
Road
8 Mile Road, Telegraph Road to Greenfield
Road
Greenfield Road, north of 11 Mile Road to 10
Mile Road

A city-wide access management ordinance that
incorporates the access management corridor plans
will empower the planning commission to use these
specific plans, in lieu of more general standards,
when making decisions along these select corridors.

~outhfield

Tra nsportation and Circulation 9-7

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

See Map 12-1 Community image improvements
for location of portals.
The City should continue to improve the appearance,
including signage, landscaping, and streetscape, at
and along these gateways with a consistent image to
clearly identify when a visitor enters and exits the
city.

Visual appearance entering the City Centre area
from the northwest along M-10 Lodge Freeway.

Visual Corridors. Like gateways, the views along
primary street corridors provide important visual
impressions about a city's character and identity.
The primary visual corridors in Southfield are foe
highways such as I-696, US-24, M-10, and M-39.
Secondary visual corridors are Greenfield, Evergreen
Southfield, Lahser, Civic Center, and the Mile roads.
Many primary visual corridors in Southfield are
flanked by a hodgepodge of building types, signs,
and lighting fixtures that vary from attractive to
unattractive. Since the views along these roads
influence motorists' impression of Southfield, views
along these corridors are very important. Views can
be improved through a variety of techniques
including more attention in the design or
reconstruction of roads, lighting landscaping, and
amenities within the right-of-way. Design of private
projects can be improved through design guidelines
and other regulatory techniques applied to new
development. The City should upgrade the aesthetic
appearance of these visual corridors through the use
of streetscape improvements, tree preservation, and
improved landscaping and site design standards.
Many of the corridors abut rear yards of the adjacent
properties, where design standards don't require as
much 'curb appeal.' Design standards along these
corridors should include separate standards for
property lines that abut the right-of-way.

Natural Corridors. While gateways and other
visual corridors in the City establish the character and
identity along prominent routes, several other major

routes form natural corridors around the City. In
contrast to the streetscape improvements and more
urban character goals of the visual corridors, natural
corridors are akin to Natural Beauty Roads in more
rural communities; these are roads with large, mature
trees providing a vegetative canopy and natural
setting along significant lengths. These natural
corridors, or "shady lanes" as they have been called,
include 9 Mile Road west of Lahser, Berg, Beech, l 0
Mile Road west of Telegraph Evergreen Road
between 8 and 9 Mile Roads, and Inkster south of 10
Mile Road. The City should emphasize preservation
of natural features and incorporation of natural
greenbelts, landscaping, and building design and
placement compatible with the natural setting along
these corridors.

Enhancement Corridors. Two main corridor
sections in Southfield would benefit greatly from
coordinated corridor enhancement: Telegraph Road
and Southfield Road. A section of each of these
streets is a corridor subarea which discusses the land
use and transportation issues and opportunities in
more detail and establishes objectives and detailed
future land use that guide development. Both
corridors have also been identified as having the
greatest need for access management.
Telegraph Road (US-24): Telegraph Road is
Southfield's main north-south road in the
western half of the City. It is already an 8-lane
boulevard with a wide median, designed to be
wide enough to accommodate indirect
"Michigan" left-turns at major intersections.
Some sections of the street have coordinated
landscaping and signage, but coordinated design
and character elements are needed for its entire
length. The City should evaluate the benefits of
forming a new city improvement authority for
Telegraph and extending invitations to
neighboring communities immediately adjacent
to Southfield.
Southfield Road: Southfield Road is the main
north-south road in the eastern half of Southfield.
The street is a 5 to 7 lane cross-section with a
mix of office, commercial, and residential
developed piecemeal over the last 25 years. ew
infill development and the potential for future
redevelopment presents a opportunity to
encourage common design elements and help
create a stronger sense of identity and character
along this important section of Southfield Road.
A planned improvement project to convert the
center turn lane area into a landscaped median
will also provide additional opportunities for
Transportation and Circulation 9-8

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

unifying streetscape elements and access
management. As Southfield's adjacent
neighbors along Southfield Road have similar
plans to upgrade their segments with a median,
the City should seize this opportunity to evaluate
the benefits of forming a Southfield Road
Corridor Improvement Authority jointly with
Lathrup Village, Beverly Hills, Birmingham, and
the Road Commission for Oakland County.

Traffic Calming. Balancing safety and accessibility
for all modes of transportation includes harmonizing
the roadway and non-motorized facilities with the
surrounding development. Traffic calming measures
(i.e. physical changes in the road design) often cause
drivers to reduce speeds and be more attentive by
affecting the driver's psychological frame of mind.
Statistics show that 85 percent of vehicle-topedestrian crashes will result in death to the
pedestrian if a vehicle is traveling at 40 mph, versus
only a 15 percent rate if a vehicle is traveling at 20
mph. The reduction of speeds in areas designed or
intended to encourage pedestrian and bicycle use
through speed limits and traffic calming will improve
both safety statistics and the perception of safety for
all users.
While many traditional traffic calming programs
have been aimed at taming high-speed cut-through
traffic in residential areas, traffic calming is also
effective along major roadways to encourage
pedestrian and bicycle use and reduce speeds. A
number of factors need to be considered with any
traffic calming measures or programs, such as traffic
volumes, cost, maintenance and impact on
emergency access.

The City should include traffic calming elements in
its transportation standards that evaluate the benefits
and opportunities for implementing traffic calming
measures in the City.

Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)
There are opportunities within the City at several
locations to make corridors and development areas
more transit friendly by adopting Transit-Oriented
Development (TOD) standards for development.
Future growth and redevelopment of commercial
employment centers should strongly consider the
inclusion of a mixture of residential, commercial, and
institutional uses designed to promote convenient
non-motorized access to transit facilities and between
residential, retail, and office uses. National data from
numerous studies shows automobile traffic in and
around TOD is often IO percent or more less than
similar developments designed with a suburban style
separation of uses.
TOD strategies support the City's goal to create a
more livable and walkable community. TOD and
transit-oriented corridors consist of land use patterns
that promote travel by transit, bicycle, walking and
ridesharing, and encourage concentration of mixed
use development along transportation corridors
serviced by transit. A conceptual design of a typical
TOD layout is provided below. Elements of TOD
include:

•

•

Some common traffic calming techniques:

•
•

•
•
•

Street Narrowing, Slow Points, or Chokers
Medians and Boulevards
Streetscape Enhancements
Perimeter Treatments

•

Development of a highly desirable community
with cultural amenities, easy walking distance to
goods and services, access to regional and local
trail systems,
and the
opportunity to
live and work
in the same
area.
Heightened
sense of
community
through
increased
pedestrian
activity and
development at
a more human
scale.
Clustered development with transit access
offering better access to goods and services .
Enhanced marketability of new development and
enhanced property values .

Transportation and Circulation 9-9

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•

•

Stronger inter-modal connections, providing
opportunities for pedestrians and bicyclists to
better link with transit and the regional trail
system.
Increased economic development opportunities
in attractive commercial and employment
locations.

Transit Service
Transit service is an important component of the
transportation system because it offers another
transportation option for the community and
increases mobility for those who are unable to drive.
Transit increases the overall capacity of the
transportation system, which supports the Plan's goal
to maintain and improve the transportation system
without excessive road widening. The City's efforts
in improving the transit system should be focused on
the most cost-effective methods to increase ridership
in the existing bus systems.

Southfield is served by two main public transit
operators: the Suburban Mobility Authority for
Regional Transportation (SMART), and the Detroit
Department of Transportation (DDOT). SMART is
the regional transit provider that serves many
suburban communities in southeastern Michigan,
including Southfield. SMART offers a fixed-route
bus system and an advanced reservation curb-to-curb
connector. Several SMART bus lines serve
Southfield and a major SMART hub and park and
ride lot are located at Northland Mall. DDOT offers
bus service for the city of Detroit that serves several
locations in Southfield: Northland Mall, Providence
Hospital, and the 8 Mile corridor between Lahser and
Greenfield roads (see Map 9-3). SMART and DDOT
routes are frequently reviewed and adjusted by each
transit service provider based on ridership counts and
transit-supportive land uses can increase the demand
for transit services.

In addition to the two major transit providers,
Transportation of Southfield Seniors (TOSS)
provides advance reservation door-to-door service
within Southfield and to and from its adjacent
communities. Greyhound Bus links Southfield to
communities throughout and beyond the region from
a station at the corner of Lahser and 11 Mile at
interchange of 1-696 and M-10. This station serves
as a hub connecting local transit and automobiles
with destinations across the country. Rt·novation or
expansion of the station property in the future as a
true multi-modal station in the future could support
the City's goal of improving the transportation
system without costly road widening. Key features
could include bike racks or bike parking with bike
route information, taxi stand, SMART bus
information center and stop, and space to
accommodate other transit providers such as DDOT
or future regional enhanced transit services.
Convenient access to transit is an important
component of the City's Transportation Plan.
Consistent with the City's goals, developing the City
with a multi-modal transportation system will help
maintain the long term health and sustainability of
the community. The city of Southfield should
consider transit needs (routes, shelters, park and ride)
when evaluating development projects.
In order to have the critical mass to make public
transit viable, the density of development needs to be
sufficient to support transit. Shopping and
employment destinations need to be designed to be
transit-oriented (and pedestrian oriented). A common
standard sited by transit authorities is a threshold of
seven dwelling units per acre or seven jobs per acre
to create the critical mass to make transit viable. A
diffused land use pattern near transit lines reduces
ridership and the effectiveness of the system. In
addition, low density development limits the ability
for those who need transit service to easily access it.
Where practical, the City should cluster the higher
density development within a walkable distance
(generally a quarter mile) from a transit route.
Within mixed use areas, the highest intensity uses,
such as retail and personal service uses, should be
located closest to the transit route(s), with the
remaining uses radiating out at a decreasing intensity.
In addition, the city can help encourage transit use by
ensuring that sites along transit routes are designed to
be pedestrian-friendly, are located along routes
accessing key destinations, and have bus shelters to
make transit even more convenient for residents and
workers.

Transportation and Circulation 9-10

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

New or enhanced transit facilities (including new
stops, shelters, or park and ride) should be considered
where large commercial or residential developments
are proposed along existing routes. Route networks
and service areas should be examined for potential
improvements if a large development is proposed
where transit service is not provided. Design
considerations are needed to ensure all residents and
workers, including those who are disabled, have safe
access to all transit stops. Stops with higher than
average use should be 'enhanced' and include
amenities such as a bus shelter, benches, signage,
route information, and wider sidewalks, which all
provide a more attractive environment and encourage
the use of the transit system. Bus shelters have been
shown to increase ridership compared to a stop
without a sheltered area to wait for a bus, but
maintenance (such as repair of damaged structures,
trash collection) may require a joint effort between
the City and transit provider. The City and
SMART/DDOT should work together to identify
locations and maintenance options for 'enhanced' bus
stops. Any changes to routing, frequency, stop
locations, and stop amenities must be coordinated
with SMART and/or DDOT (or other relevant
transportation agency).
A highly accessible and convenient transit system
requires a well integrated non-motorized network and
transit oriented development patterns, which are
discussed in more detail in this chapter.

Non-Motorized Transportation
Non-motorized transportation (sidewalks, bike lanes,
pathways) not only helps meet the overall goal of a
healthy community but also provides an alternate
mode of travel. An interconnected system of bike
routes, bike lanes, sidewalks, and pathways not only
provide residents an alternative travel option for
shorter trips, they also provide more convenient
access to transit facilities, recreation opportunities,
improve connections throughout the City, help reduce
isolation, and can even help reduce traffic volumes.
A more walkable community also has significant
health benefits for its residents. The City should
consider preparing a city-wide non-motorized
transportation plan.
A primary goal of non-motorized pathways is the
connection of residential areas to parks, schools, and
employment, shopping, and entertainment centers.
Non-motorized transportation can provide health
benefits by providing local, convenient facilities for

~outhfield

exercise to allow users to be active and through the
potential for reduced automobile emissions.

While a majority of the City's non-motorized
facilities are sidewalks, Southfield maintains a
designated network of bicycle routes throughout the
City. Primarily located along major streets, the
system contains over 32 miles of bicycle routes that
are contiguous, uninterrupted paths that connect
destinations across the City as illustrated on Map 9-3.
While most of the routes in the system are internal to
the City, Nine Mile and Shiawassee routes terminate
on the west at the city's border with Farmington
Hills, and Evergreen route terminates on the north at
the city's border with Beverly Hills. These routes
offer the potential Jinks to communities beyond
Southfield's borders.
The City's bicycle routes are made of four distinct
pathway types:
Asphalt bike paths, 8 feet in width, marked with
bike route signs (5 3/8 mi).
Concrete sidewalk, 5 feet in width, marked with
bike route signs (15 3/4 mi).
Asphalt paved shoulder, 5 feet in width, marked
with bike route signs (4 1/2 mi).
Roadway (concrete or asphalt) marked with bike
route signs (6 3/4 mi).
Although not widely used in Southfield, on-street
bike lanes, located adjacent to the vehicular portion
of a road, may be used to accommodate higher-speed
non-motorized travel. Sidewalks generally
accommodate foot traffic and shorter bicycle trips,
while pathways are known to accommodate both foot

Transportation and Circulation 9-11

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

and wheeled, non-motorized travel. The function of
each bike route (or new bike routes) should be
considered when designing the type and width of
facilities.
The residents in Southfield have expressed a desire
for more recreational pathways and local parks. To
accomplish this, the City should capitalize on
existing natural corridors, such as the Rouge River, to
provide such resources. The natural, comforting
environments of river corridors, coupled with the
separation from vehicular traffic, make these
corridors ideal for a pathway system. The
watercourses often link Southfield with other
communities, and provide the opportunity for future
connections with other regional trails. In addition,
river corridors are often associated with the regional
detention basins that exist throughout the City. These
sites, when properly designed, have the potential to
become recreational destinations located
conveniently along a pathway route.
Throughout the community, the system of sidewalks
and pathways should be continually upgraded and
expanded. All new development and redevelopment
should require sidewalks on both sides of the street,
and standards and design criteria should be developed
to ensure safe, convenient connections between
internal circulation and public non-motorized
facilities. The non-motorized transportation system
should be expanded and upgraded taking into
consideration the following factors:

Connectivity. To
establish connections
between the Southfield
pathways system and the
greater regional
pathways network, the
City must coordinate
with neighboring
communities. Oakland
County Parks and
Recreation has
developed a plan to
create and expand a
regional network of paths and trails. While no
proposed pathways are indicated for Southfield, the
City should actively pursue connection of
Southfield's bike routes to those of neighboring
communities, including Lathrup Village, Berkley,
Oak Park, Huntington Woods and Detroit.

provides a vision for future improvements. The City
maintains a fairly well connected system, but the
system is limited and has gaps in connecting key
areas. Any new development in the City should be
required to construct or improve the pathways along
the site frontage, or contribute to a fund to expand
and improve the City's bike route network.

Continuity. Maintaining an interconnected system
of sidewalks, leading to community or r1~gional
pathways, enhances the pedestrian and nonmotorized environment. The City should vigorously
pursue filling in gaps in the system that act as
barriers. While City funds may be used for this
purpose, the community in general should also share
in this commitment. Options to accomplish this
include requiring the installation of pathways along
major roads and sidewalks throughout the interior of
new projects or for residential lots that have not
maintained or installed their sidewalks, requiring an
escrow or performance guarantee when transfer of
property ownership occurs.
Continuity also refers to making critical connections
throughout the system. This includes ensuring that
sidewalks internal to a neighborhood maintain a
connection to the main road or other pathway
systems, and that commercial or civic destinations
include non-motorized (and transit) connections and
amenities for users.

Accessibility. Children, young adults, seniors and
disabled residents often rely on the non-motorized
transportation system and public transit as their
primary means of travel. Their unique needs must be
considered when designing them. When considering
improvements to these systems, the following
considerations should be included:

•

•

•

•
Map 9-3 shows recommended bike path/bike route
improvements throughout the City. It illustrates the
location of existing bike path/bike routes, and

Southfield

Require a safe non-motorized link between
internal site amenities and the public nonmotorized system in regulations and when
reviewing developments.
Emphasize linking areas with high
concentrations of senior or child/teen residents
with facilities that serve them, such as senior
centers, recreational facilities, churches and
schools.
Pedestrian signals that produce an audible sound
to indicate signal changes to assist disabled and
hard of hearing residents crossing at critical
intersections.
Maintain a consistent intersection design, so
disabled users can easily anticipate where a
bench, pedestrian crossing button, or shelter is
located.
Transportation and Circulation 9-12

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

■

Install textured materials, such as brick or
stamped concrete, at the edges of sidewalks to
indicate where the walk ends and the motorized
travel lanes of the road begin.

One of the most important destinations for children
and teens is school, both for regular class time and
extracurricular activities. MDOT has a special
program, described in detail below, to encourage and
assist communities in evaluating and improving nonmotorized routes to schools.

Safe Routes to School. Particular attention to safety
is needed near schools. Schools in the Southfield
Public School District should seek this funding
source as a way to encourage walking or biking to
school by providing a safer environment for children.
The "Safe Routes to School" program, managed by
the Michigan Department of Transportation, is
expected to gain momentum because it offers state
money for physical improvements and programs
aimed at increasing students'
use of the non-motorized
system as a means to and from
school. While the program
requires each school to prepare
an action plan in order to
qualify for funding, the City
SAFE ROUTES
can assist in coordination and
to School
enginee1ing assistance for
,,r11:•,.;t r-~.1·•1tr.&lt;:.-11r
schools wishing to participate.
Convenience. While people will walk farther
distances for exercise/recreation purposes, the
average pedestrian will not walk more than 15
minutes or a quarter mile to reach their destination.
Therefore, convenient routes must be offered to
encourage more pedestrian activity as an alternative
to driving. This includes considerations for road
crossings, conflicts with others using the same
pathway, continuity of the pathway, and directness of
the route. Inconvenient systems can encourage
unsafe activity or use of non-designated pathways or
crossings. Where the City wishes to increase
pedestrian activity, it should ensure that continuous
pathways are provided that offer numerous, safe
crossings that bring the pedestrian to the forefront of
consideration, rather than making the automobile the
priority.
Safety. Without a safe pedestrian system, it will not
be used to its maximum. Elements such as lighting,
proper maintenance, and proper crossing
enhancements will bring comfort to sidewalk and
pathway users, which will encourage more use.
Where high pedestrian activity exists or is

~puthfield
J

1'

.

encouraged, the City should work toward reducing
the posted speed limits to reduce the severity or
likelihood of serious injury or death in these types of
crashes. A combination of these factors, along with
the other elements that follow, should be used to
increase the safety of the entire system. In addition,
an annual sidewalk repair program is used to identify
problems and repair existing sidewalks to provide a
safe and accessible sidewalk network. This program
is effective and should continue.

Crosswalk Improvements. User safety is of
particular concern where sidewalks and pathways
intersect with motorized travel routes. Safety hazards
exist where the non-motorized system crosses

individual driveways, or where they meet at a road
intersection. In these areas, the following
improvements should be considered.
■

■

■

■

■

Pavement markings should clearly indicate to
motorists where pedestrian activity will occur.
Vehicles are not permitted to block these areas.
Maintain clear vision zones at all intersections.
This can increase visibility for motorists,
pedestrians and bikers, all of whom need to be
aware of potential conflicts.
Narrow the roadway at crossing points by
installing road medians or raised islands within
the roadway to create a safe haven for
pedestrians and bikers, or by eliminating onstreet parking and extending the sidewalk closer
to the road. This wiJl reduce the number of lanes
a pedestrian must cross and increases their
perceived safety. These elements can also
enhance the aesthetic environment by providing
planting areas or resting areas.
Provide adequate lighting at intersections so
pedestrians and bikers are safe at all hours.
Include overhead flashers to indicate nonsignalized crossing points. Mid-block crossings

Transportation and Circulation 9-13

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•
•

can be further enhanced by using pavement
markings and signage at the motorists' eye level.
Consider restrictions of right turns on red at high
volume intersections, as most motorists fail to
consider the pedestrian when turning.
Include medians in the design or redesign of
intersections, especially where a high volume of
pedestrian activity is expected. Medians provide
safer crosswalk options for all residents.

On-Street Bike Lanes vs. Separated Paths. While
not widely recognized, design of sidewalks and
pathways can discourage use by bicyclists. Bicycles
using sidewalks or shared pathways often encounter
slow pedestrians, multiple driveways and intersection
signals that interrupt their flow. These factors can

Buffers. Landscaped buffers consisting of street
trees or other streetscape elements create a separation
between motorized and non-motorized activity. They
also provide a physical barrier to protect pedestrians
on the sidewalks from vehicles, and breaks in
landscaping indicate to motorists where driveway and
non-signalized intersections are located and where
pedestrians are likely to cross. Buffers should not be
confused with setbacks, as larger setbacks are not
necessarily endorsed as a way to improve pedestrian
safety because they can decrease visibil1ty from
motorized traffic.

Implementation
In addition to specific measures outlined above,
general implementation tools such as funding sources
and impact studies will play an important role in
realizing benefits proposed by this plan. During the
plan process, citizens and the Advisory Committee
identified a desire for more bike paths and sidewalks
in the City, as part of a healthy Southfield initiative.

Transportation Funding

Pathway

Bicycle Lane

slow their speed,
and discourage
bicycle activity. Alternatively, on-street bike lanes
allow bikers to travel at higher speeds, and give them
the right-of-way over intersecting traffic and
pedestrians.
Bikers using designated on-street lanes share the road
with motorists and
are more visible to
them. The City
should consider
adding bike lanes
along routes
commonly used by
bicyclists. Bike
lanes require some
public education
during the initial
stages of use, but
can provide
desirable travel alternatives in the long-term.

~l_!thfield

The primary source of City funding for roadway
improvements is the Michigan Transportation Fund
(MTF), established by Public Act 51 of 19 51, as
amended. This program is administered jointly by
the Department of Transportation and the Department
of State. State revenue from fuel taxes, vehicle
registration taxes, sales taxes from auto related
sources, and other vehicle fees are provided to local
road agencies in accordance with statutory formula.
This is the primary funding source for both the City
and the Road Commission.
There are also federal transportation funds available
for transportation improvements through a variety of
programs including the Federal Highway Trust Fund,
National Highway System, Surface Transportation
Program, State and Community Highway Safety
Grants and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement Program (CMAQ). These funds are
allocated to road agencies by SEMCOG through the
long range regional transportation planning process
and the Five-Year Transportation Improvement Plan
(TIP).

Federal transportation legislation also established a
fund for specific transportation enhancement
activities, such as non-motorized or streetscape
improvements. Funds from the Surface
Transportation Program (STP) are set aside for these
activities and can include a number of transportation

Transportation and Circulation 9-14

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

enhancement activities including historic
preservation, landscaping and beautification, bike
paths, roadway improvements, environmental
mitigation to address water pollution due to highway
runoff and other similar projects. Each year funds
become available for allocation based on competitive
needs. Requests are solicited and screened for
application completeness at the local level, screened
for project merit at the regional level and finally
selected for action at the state level by MDOT.
MDOT also offers a Transportation Economic
Development Fund (TEDF) to assist in the funding of
highway, road, and street projects necessary to
support economic growth. The program's mission is
to enhance the ability of the state to compete in an
international economy, to serve as a catalyst for
economic growth, and to improve the quality of life
enjoyed by Michigan residents. Specifically, the
program is intended to create or retain jobs and
encourage private sector investment. The fund,
administered through the Michigan Department of
Transportation Office of Economic Development, in
conjunction with the president of the Michigan
Strategic Fund, provides a means for state
government, local agencies and businesses to work
together to meet the often extensive and urgent
demands placed upon the transportation system by
economic development throughout the state. Those
eligible to apply for funds are MDOT, Road
Commission for Oakland County and the City. There
are several types of TEDF grants available. Roadway
improvements in Southfield could qualify under
Categories A and C.
•

Category A is intended to improve the network
of highway services essential to economic
competitiveness; improve accessibility to target
industries as a catalyst for economic growth;
support private initiatives that create or retain
jobs; and encourage economic development and
redevelopment efforts that improve the health,
safety, and welfare of Michigan citizens. A 20
percent local match is required.
Category C is intended to promote increased
economic potential and improve the quality of
life by reducing urban traffic congestion levels.
The project must reduce traffic congestion on
county primary or city major streets within urban
counties (counties with a population greater than
400,000).

There are also other local programs that can be used
as a source of funding for roadway improvements.
The City has the Cornerstone Development Authority

(CDA) that provides funding mechanisms for
infrastructure improvements within the CDA district,
such as Tax Increment Financing (TIP). The
property tax revenue captured by the City within the
TIP district can be used to finance improvements
established in the overall CDA plan. The City may
also establish a Local Development Finance
Authority (LDFA) to fund infrastructure
improvements in industrial areas. Similar to the
CDA, the LDFA can use Tax Incremen' Financing to
fund infrastructure improvements.

Traffic Safety Board. Similar to other successful
communities in the region, Southfield should form a
Traffic Safety Board (also known as a Traffic Review
Board) comprised of members appointed by the City
Council. With the support of staff from the
engineering department, this board would review
citizen complaints and comments, development and
redevelopment, and proposed transportation projects
to consider all land use and transportation impacts,
consult standards, and ultimately make decisions on
driveway locations, circulation of developments, and
transportation improvement projects.
The Board would use many of the tools outlined in
this Chapter, including access management, traffic
calming, gateway and portal treatments, and traffic
impact studies.
In order for the City to mitigate anticipated traffic
impacts of a proposed project, they must understand
how much traffic will be generated. A traffic impact
study should be required for a rezoning request or
proposed project that would generate traffic above a
specified threshold. In Michigan, this threshold is
typically 50 or more directional (one-way) trips in the
peak hour or 500 trips expected in an average day. In
reviewing traffic impact studies, established sources
such as the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) Trip Generation Manual or "Evaluating Traffic
Impact Studies: A Recommended Practice for
Michigan Communities" should be referenced to
determine how the projected traffic will impact the
City's transportation system.
Roadways must be designed to meet the needs of all
modes of travel and to support the availability and
use of alternate modes of transportation. As the City
continues to develop and redevelop, a more
pedestrian and transit-oriented streetscape should be
favored over the sole convenience of automobiles. In
addition to a reduction in the expected vehicular level
of service, developers should be encouraged to
improve the adequacy of sidewalks, pathways, bike
lanes and transit convenience and access.
Transportation and Circulation 9-15

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

10

Public Facilities
and Services
City Government

Goal
• Southfield will offer high quality and
efficient public services for residents.

Introduction
The city of Southfield offers a range of public
facilities to its residents and businesses. The quality,
availability, and cost of these elements are among the
factors influencing growth and redevelopment in the
City. Residential, commercial, and especially
industrial users make location decisions based. in
part, upon the ability of a municipality to meet their
present and future needs in the most cost effective
way possible. As competition for new
development/redevelopment among communities
grows and as technology advances, citizens and
business owners will expect more from local
government. To keep pace with these demands,
Southfield must continually upgrade and diversify its
facilities and services.
Public facilities and services include educational and
religious institutions, library facilities, public safety,
parks (discussed in Chapter 8 Open Space and
Recreation), sewer, water and refuse removal
(discussed in Chapter 11 Community Utilities), all of
which are provided to serve the needs of residents
and businesses m Southfield. See following Map 101. These are all organized and operated on a daily
basis by city departments. Citizens also influence
these services through participation in commissions,
boards and election to City Council.

The basic form of local government in Southfield is
Council-Administrator. The Administrator is
responsible for overseeing the everyday mechanics of
City government and reports directly to the sevenmember City Council. City Council is ~he local
legislative body which determines City policy, makes
decisions on zoning, ordinances, and legislative
matters. The Mayor, the ceremonial head of City
government, makes recommendations to Council and
is the City's representative to all other legislative
bodies.

City Departments. The City of Southfield City Hall
is located on Evergreen in the Municipal Center
complex. The building houses offices for most City
Departments and boards and commissions. At the
time this plan was prepared, the City had 26
departments under the Mayor, City Council and the
City Administrator. Many of those departments will
have a direct or support role in implementation of this
plan.
Boards and Commissions. Southfield has an active
citizen population that participates in a number of
different boards and commissions. Citizens may
become members of these groups either through
appointment or by election. At the time the plan was
prepared, these bodies included, but are not limited
to:
Brownfield Redevelopment Authority
City Centre Advisory Board
City Council
Commission on Senior Adults
Cornerstone Development Authority
Economic Development Corporation
Historic District Commission
Historic Designation Advisory Board
Housing Commission
Library Board
Local Development Finance Authority
Parent-Youth Guidance Commission
Parks and Recreation Commission
Planning Commission
Tax Increment Finance Authority
Total Living Commission
Veterans Commission
Zoning Board of Appeals

Public Facilities and Services 10-1

�Map 10-1: Community Facilities
Southfield Comprehensive Plan
(/)

0

C

~
::::n
(l)

a:

;:o
C.

----------·-· 1-··---------------------------------

'

r·----------------------------------

;
:

i

Legend

i

L-----,

Q

4

L-------

6

12 Mil Rd

Police
Fire

I

i
ns

_nn

i

Public Schools

I

9

_,..

Civic Center (City Hall, Library)

12 i,
___

C)

1, ADLAI STEVENSON ELEMENTARY

cil

(l)

1

:::,

ffi1

2, ALICE M BIRNEY MIDDLE SCHOOL

::0

3, ARTHUR ASHE ACADEMY

0:
C.

4, ARTHUR H VANDENBERG ELEMENTARY

i

5, BRACE LEDERLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

i
!'------------

7, MACARTHUR K-8 UNIVERSITY ACADEMY

6, BUSSEY CENTER

i

8, DWIGHT D EISENHOWER SCHOOL
9, FRED D LEONHARD ELEMENTARY

,

15

10, GLENN LEVEY MIDDLE SCHOOL

I

'

-

i
l.

8

11 , GLENN SCHOENHALS ELEMENTARY
12, HELEN MCINTYRE ELEMENTARY
13, JOHN F KENNEDY ELEMENTARY
C/)
0

c::

14, MARY THOMPSON MIDDLE SCHOOL

(l)

15, MORRIS ADLER ELEMENTARY

~
::::n

0:

3

::0

16, SOUTHFIELD LATHRUP HIGH SCHOOL

C.

~

13

17, SOUTHFIELD HIGH SCHOOL

Religious Institutions

10

Rd

•

Private Schools

•

Colleges &amp; Universities

5
"C

::i"
-;,:-

a::

(/)

..c
a.
~

w
Af
.'.l.

7

g

O&gt;
Q)

~

O

0.25

0.5
Miles

1 inch equals 3,000 feet
8 Mile Rd

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Other Agencies and Jurisdictions. Southfield
includes a host of outside agencies that require ongoing coordination and communication. Two key
agencies are the Michigan Department of
Transportation (MDOT) and Oakland County. The
County interacts with the City in many facets
including the drain and road commissions; parks and
recreation, planning, and economic development
departments; and court system.

The Department is among the busiest in the County
and still manages to maintain an average response
time of less than four minutes to any address. In
2008 there were five fire stations, two located on 9
Mile, two on 12 Mile, and one on Lahser Road as
depicted on Map 10-1.

Public Safety
The City of Southfield Public Safety Group includes
the police and fire departments and is committed to
providing the best possible service, protection and
prevention by providing ongoing training for
personnel and keeping current with community
needs. As a result, Southfield's Public Safety
response system is considered one of the best in
Michigan.

Fire. The Southfield Fire Department was the first in
Michigan to offer advanced life support (paramedic)
when it initiated the service in 1972. Since then, it
has continued to be a leader in emergency medical
service, with the most modem training and
equipment available. Southfield offers a full-service

Fire Department which has the dual ability to fight
fires and provide paramedic service. It also supplies
technically trained special rescue teams such as
hazardous materials, high-rise, confined space and
trench rescue.
Soutl~/'ield Fire Department Mission
".. to prm•ide the citizens and visitors of
Soutl~field with the highest quality fire
prevention, emergency medical care andj'ire
protection available. We accomplish this
mission by intense training, thorough
preparation, prompt professional response and
a positiJ,e, caring attitude toward those we are
sworn to protect."

S uthfield

Police. The City of Southfield Police Department is
an integral part of the Public Safety Group. The
Southfield Police Mission
"We believe in the dignity and worth of all
people. We stand.for providing fair and equal
enforcement&lt;~{ the law for all. We are
committed to a professional approach to law
enforcement and supporting the needs of our
community. We shall strive tu make 0111·
department exude the trust and CUl{{idence of
the commw,ity through community-oriented
policing, continual comprehem;ive training, and
by selection and retention of quality personnel
who will best represent the police profession."

department, based out of the Municipal Center,
provides a full range of quality services which
include marked and unmarked patrol units,
investigative staff, and crime prevention services.
Numerous accolades and awards have been bestowed
on the police department by various organizations.

Emergency Management. Emergency Management
has been in the Southfield community for many
years. Formally termed Civil Defense, Emergency
Management was designed to meet the current needs
of residents with regard to early warning and safety
in cases of natural or man-made disasters. While
many communities rely upon County and State
agencies, Southfield has an independent Emergency
Management Division to serve its residents directly.

Public facilities and Services 10-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Library Facilities
The Southfield Public Library is located within the
Municipal Center complex on Evergreen Road. The
library has been a dependable community resource
and center for intellectual freedom since its
conception with a collection of 300 books at its
founding in I 844. Since that time, the library has
steadily grown and now offers an unsurpassed
collection of print and media, all easily accessed
within a world-class building constructed in 2003.
All residents of Southfield and Lathrup Village are
eligible for a Southfield library card, which provides
access to the library's off-site, web-based information
sources. In addition, Southfield is a part of The
Library Network (TLN) which permits residents to
use libraries in other metro Detroit communities who
have formed reciprocal borrowing agreements.
The Southfield Public Library offers a full array of
modern library services. Beyond a great print
collection, residents can enjoy music CDs, DVDs,
well-equipped computer labs, and wi-fi throughout
the building. Below is sampling of the types of
amenities available at the library:
The Bookends Cafe
Friends Book Sales
Drive-Up Services
Express Check Out Stations
Books by Mail
English Language Learning Instruction System
Foreign Language Collection
Literacy Collection

In 2008, the Southfield Public School district had 17
school sites located near and within the
neighborhoods, and accessible by school bus or
walking and biking. They include:
Adler Elementary School
Birney Middle School
Brace-Lederle K-8 School
Bussey Center for Early Childhood Education
Eisenhower Elementary School
Kennedy Elementary School
Leonhard Elementary School
Levey Middle School
MacArthur K-8 University Academy
McIntyre Elementary School
Schoenhals Elementary School
Southfield High School
Southfield-Lathrup High School
Southfield Regional Academic Campus (SRAC)
Stevenson Elementary School
Thompson Middle School
Vandenberg Elementary School

,-

Farmington

r'

Public

._ ,

Southfield
Public
Schools

Schools
- -1

ll

L,; --~
Educational Facilities
Public. The majority of Southfield residents, and all
of Lathrup Village, are served by Southfield Public
Schools. A small segment of the population in the
northeast comer of the City attends Birmingham
Public Schools, while some in the southeast comer
attend Oak Park Schools.

~

uthfield

I

f: arencevillf?
Schools

-.

I
I

l _ i

lOak Park- --

-

~ -Schools'
- - - - - - - - -·-· -

Source: Oakland County Planning and Economic
Development Services

While enrollment in the district has declined in the
past four years, a trend that is expected to continue,
MEAP scores continue to improve. See Figure 10-1
on the following page. MEAP scores increased each
year and are comparable with state averages. The
graduation rate for the graduating class of 2005 was

Public Facilities and Services 10-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

84.5 percent, which is just slightly under the state
average of 87 .7 percent.
Private and Charter. In addition to the public
schools, there are a number of other charter, private
and parochial schools at all levels in the area. At the
time this plan was prepared there were 18.
Figure 10-1: Southfield Public Schools Total District
Enrollment Trends
2007 3
2008 3
2004 1
2005 1
20062

10, 102
10,121
9,484
Official Fall Counts
2
Total 9/27/06 Count Day
3
Projected Enrollment Method 2
Source: Southfield Public Schools

9,020

8,568

Charter schools in Southfield enrolled over 3,500
Southfield students in the Fall of 2006, while nearly
1,300 Southfield students attended private schools
both in the city of Southfield and across the metro
Detroit area.
Colleges and Universities. The city of Southfield is
home to many institutions of higher learning,
including these two notable higher educational
institutions:
■

Lawrence Technological University (LTU).
This private university occupies 125 acres in the
City. LTU enrolls nearly 5,000 students in more
than 60 degree programs at the associate' s,
bachelor's, master' s, and doctorate degree levels
in Colleges of Architecture and Design, Arts and
Sciences, Engineering, and Management.
Oakland Community College (OCC) . With
eight campuses in southeast Michigan, OCC has
an enrollment over 70,000. The Southfield
Campus focuses on the health profession and
offers 15 programs ranging from health
professions and technologies and nursing to
diagnostic medical sonography and nuclear
medicine technology.

Religious Institutions

Southfield has a diverse population with varied
spiritual interests. As a result, the City contains more
than 50 religious institutions and places of worship.

~';:lthfield

Public facilities and Services 10-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Recommendations
City Government. The City currently offers a wellorganized structure to handle the demanding daily
issues of a mature community. The responsibility of
implementing various recommendations will fall on
different departments and include different
jurisdictions. In the years following adoption of this
Plan, it will be important that all of the departments
coordinate on a regular basis regarding the
implementation status. These efforts should be
organized in a way so everyone is communicating
efficiently and duplication of efforts is avoided. A
Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is a means of
coordinating the long-term projects of each
department with a priority level and funding source.
CIPs typically cover five-year periods and are
updated annually.

ease citizens will feel. This will, in turn , garner longterm stability among residents and business owners
and assist with residential and economic growth.

Library, Educational and Religious Institutions.
Institutional resources such as libraries, schools and
places of worship enrich the lives of citizens and are
important in attracting new businesses and residents
to the region. Institutional resources should be
showcased consistently as this plan is implemented.
While development of institutional facil ·ties many
times falls out of the City' s jurisdiction, the City
should work with the appropriate agencies to
maintain a high quality of services and ensure
convenient access to the facilities . Most importantly,
the city of Southfield should work to highlight these
facilities in promotional materials to help market the
City.

There will be occasions where strategies and
recommendations are inconsistently defined or
interpreted, therefore is it important that regular
' training ' sessions be held. These sessions will help
to ensure consistent interpretation of goals,
brainstorming implementation strategies and conflict
resolution.

Public Safety. The fire and police departments are
important resources in implementing this plan and
building upon the assets and quality of life in the
City. Both departments should continue to use their
current programs and services to improve
neighborhood and business safety and increase the
feeling of safety throughout the community.
The Southfield Police Department has specific
priorities for the future including:

•

•
•

Continue implementation of non-traditional
police management concepts, or the private
sector approach to governmental management.
That is, increase the level of service by viewing
the public and police employees as customers
and addressing their needs.
Develop and encourage a leadership style that
will support a high level of service by retaining
and developing our personnel.
Continue community policing programs,
partnerships between police, business, schools,
and citizens, designed not only to solve crime,
but to help solve related problems.

For all public safety elements, it is important to
remember that the more open and visible these
departments and efforts are to the public, the more at

Southfield
~
-.
.

Public Facilities and Services 10-5

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

11

Community
Utilities

Goals
• Southfield should provide and maintain a
high quality, cost effective, energy and
resource efficient public water supply,
public wastewater service, storm water
management and household refuse and
recyclables collections for the community;
and serve as a warden for the installation
of telecommunication facilities and power
transmission lines.

Between July 1995 and February 2006, the City
purchased an average of 13.26 million gallons per
day from SOCW A. During this period the amount of
water purchased and billed to individual Southfield
customers trended downward. The difference
between the amount of water purchased from
SOCW A and the amount Southfield bills to its
customers represents water loss. The a, erage water
loss in the City's water distribution system has been
decreasing. The average water loss dropped from 9 .1
percent in 1999 to 6. 7 percent in 2007. This is less
than the typical 10 to 12 percent average water loss
for a community of Southfield's size.

Introduction

Southfield's water usage breaks down approximately
as follows:

Water. Water is provided to the city of Southfield by
the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department
(DWSD) via the Southeast Oakland County Water
Authority's (SOCWA) pumping and distribution
system. SOCWA's governing body is a Board of
Trustees consisting of one representative from each
member community.

Fi ~ure lllWt
us omer Class
- : a er Ct
Customer Class

The SOCWA water system has two primary
connections to the DWSD water system. These are
near the intersections of 12 Mile Road and Inkster
Road, and 14 Mile Road and Lahser Road.
There is a third connection to DWSD near the
intersection of Greenfield Road and 8 Mile Road.
Because this connection does not have as much
available hydraulic grade elevation, this flow is
pumped into the SOCWA system through SOCW A
owned and operated pumps. These pumps are only
used during periods of high demand in the summer
when the two primary connections cannot be utilized
any more due to their high flow limits.
The SOCWA system has five ground storage
reservoirs with a total capacity of 29.5 million
gallons. Water is pumped by seven pump stations
out of storage and into higher terrain. It has three
elevated water storage tanks with a total of 3 million
gallons. SOCWA delivers water through
approximately 54 miles of water main with
diameters ranging from 16 to 48 inches leading to 48
metered connections to its 11 member communities.

Residential
Commercial
Total

Usa2e
68 %
32%
100%

The 2007 Water Master Plan Update projected that
average water consumption in the City would not
change significantly over the next 20 years.
The City's water system has two pressure districts.
The high-pressure district is located in the northwest
corner of the City in the area generally bounded by
11 Mile Road, Telegraph Road, and the City' s limits.
This district is created through two connections to
SOCW A high-pressure mains. These connections are
SO- IO and SO-11. City system demands from the
SO-11 connection flow through a Pressure Reducing
Valve (PRV). Another PRY exists in the City system
along Inkster Road near the intersection of Inkster
Road and 11 Mile Road. This PRY allows
connection between the high-pressure district and the
remainder of the City's water distribution system.
The City's distribution system contains no storage
tanks or booster stations.
The most recent Fire Protection Classification
Improvement Statements for the City were prepared
by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) in 2002. The
City ' s Fire Protection Classification is rated as 3,
which is considered to be a good fire protection
rating for a city of Southfield's size.

Community Utilities 11- 1

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Sanitary and Combined Sewers. There are
approximately 217 miles of sanitary and 40 miles of
combined sewers in the City. New sanitary sewer
lines are being installed in many areas, allowing more
properties to connect to the sanitary sewer system.
The City contracts with the Oakland County Drain
Commissioners Office for sewage disposal via the
DWSD sewage system.
Storm Water. The City's 1999 Storm Water Permit
Application and 2001 Storm Water Management
Master Plan contains detailed information on the
City's storm sewers.
There are six drainage districts in Southfield as
follows:
Drainage District
Twelve Towns
8Mile
Evans Branch
Main Rouge
Pebble Creek
Rummell Drain

Drains to:
Ultimately to the
Clinton River
Rouge River
Rouge River
Main branch of the
Rouge River
Rouge River
Rouge River

drainage. In Southfield there are 40 miles of natural
watercourses including nine miles of the Main
Branch of the Rouge River and over 31 miles of
Rouge River tributaries.
FiscaJ Year 2006/07 Water and Sewer Expenses.
Recommended water and sewer fund expenditures in
the fiscal year 2006/07 budget totaled approximately
$35 million. This included approximately $3.4
million in capital projects. Water and sewer
expenditures are approximately 26 percc nt of alJ City
expenditures.

Recommendations
Water. The 2007 Water Master Plan Update
recommended the following capital improvements to
the City's water infrastructure. Details of these
proposed improvements are included in Appendix F
of that report.
■

■

■

■

The City covers approximately 26.2 square miles
(16,768 acres) with 21.7 square miles within the
Rouge River Watershed and 4.5 square miles within
the Clinton River Watershed.
■

There are approximately 34 Oakland County drains
within the City.
The majority of the City's sewer system consists of
separate sanitary and storm sewers. However, some
areas of the City are in the Twelve Towns Drainage
District which is a combined sanitary and storm
water system.

The report also recommended the following
operational improvements:
■

There are approximately 6,000 storm and combined
system catch basins that the City is responsible for,
4,000 catch basins on private property that are
privately maintained and 2,000 on federal , state and
county road rights-of-ways in Southfield. Of the
City's 6,000 catch basins, it cleans approximately
3,000 each year.
The Main Branch of the Rouge River and its
tributaries and the Clinton River are the receiving
waters for Southfield's 26 square miles of surface

Phase I Improvements (Cost estimate
$2,750,000).
Phased development of a high-pressure district in
the Northeast section of the City.
Implementation of pilot pipe rehabilitation
practices.
Preparation of a Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality Drinking Water
Revolving Fund Project Plan for the remainder
of the City based on the pilot rehabilitation
program.
Phase II Improvements: Replace and/or
rehabilitate various old, small diameter, cast iron
water mains with a history of water main breaks.

■

Develop a valve maintenance program, including
knowing the operational condition and location
of valves. This is especially needed in sections
11 through 13 of the City to enable the
successful implementation of the recommended
high pressure district. The City should conduct a
field reconnaissance to locate and identify valve
conditions in these sections. The City should use
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) for these
valves and incorporate their locations into the
existing Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
database.
Explore the use of trench less technologies to
rehabilitate water mains in priority districts.

Community Utilities 11-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•

•
•

•

Record and manage data about pipe size, soil
conditions, material and other pertinent
information for use in future decision-making
processes.
Develop a computerized maintenance
management program.
Establish data viewing terminals or acquire
SCADA (supervisory control and data
acquisition systems) data from SOCWA on a
regular interval. By documenting flow rate and
pressure variations, the City will improve the
flow management of the water distribution
system.
Because the SO-11 connection meters
approximately one-half of all the water used in
the City, this connection as well as the water
mains connected to it, should be regularly
investigated and maintained.

Storm Water. The City's 2001 Storm Water
Management Master Plan recommended that each of
the City's 6,000 catch basins be inspected and
cleaned at least once a year and each connecting
storm sewer line should be cleaned at least every five
years.
The City's annual Rouge River Clean Up Day project
should be supplemented by additional clean-up
efforts at other times of the year to allow for a wider
pool of volunteers. The City should also develop an
"adopt a section" program for the Rouge River.
Businesses, churches and other groups would then
maintain and enhance their section either through the
June event or at other times of the year. The City
should consider more bank stabilization projects
using contractors, seasonal college labor, court
probation workers and volunteer groups.
The City should review the feasibility of establishing
a viable, dedicated funding source for its storm water
management program, such as a storm water utility.

~outhfiel9

Community Utilitie s 11-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Pion

12

Community
Image

Goals
• Promote commercial and residential
development/redevelopment that is
carefully considered , aesthetically
pleasing and functional.
• Improve the highly visible public
parks/open space/roadways to maintain
community character and increase public
safety.
• Enhance the identity and appearance of
mixed use/commercial districts and
residential neighborhoods.
• Protect and enhance Southfield's natural
attributes.

Introduction
A community's physical image is composed of both
natural and man-made features. Distinct or unique
features such as the elaborate design of a landmark
building, maintenance of a concrete median, or debris
along the roadway are all elements that play a part in
defining community image.
Many of the elements that make up the community's
physical image have to be accepted as givens or
beyond local public control. The natural features
which make up the physical environment of
Southfield, such as the general topography, rivers and
streams and existing vegetation, are elements which
cannot be easily changed and must be considered
permanent. Also, many of the region's economic and
man-made structures and features are the result of
forces beyond the local control and need to be
accepted or accommodated. Some of these larger
forces include the following: dominance of the
automobile, new technologies and changing market
trends.

Dominance of the Automobile. One of the greatest
impacts on our lifestyles and on our urban
environment has been the emergence of the
"automobile culture." The auto, while providing
convenient and comfortable transportation, has also
contributed to urban sprawl, air and water pollution,
and the need for an extensive network of roads and
parking facilities. These factors tend to be a primary
component of our visual environment. How to

accommodate the auto is perhaps the single most
critical challenge in contemporary urban design.

New Technologies and Changing Market Trends.
Technology is changing how we design our homes
and communities. Communication technologies,
such as television, the computer, video r~corders and
the Internet are changing many of our personal habits
and patterns, ranging from how we shop to how we
interact and are entertained. For instance, before the
advent of movies, television and videos, people
would frequently sit on front porches and socialize
with their neighbors. Conversely, the current trend is
to rent a video and watch it at home or go to a multiscreen movie complex. Regarding shopping, the
market trend has been to develop large, single-stop,
"big box" retailers. In the future, more shopping will
be done via the Internet without leaving the home or
office. Coupled with Internet shopping use, many
communities and their residents long to venture out
in the community and interact/socialize in a
community and/or neighborhood multi-store
commercial districts/node where they can feel a part
of a larger diverse community. These trends are not
absolute, but they do show that our general living
patterns are changing and these changes need to be
continuously monitored in order to provide the
appropriate response in our physical environment.
All these major forces can be appropriately managed
and controlled to minimize most of their negative
environment and visual impacts. The essential
requirements are to recognize that these forces are a
major factor in our lives and address them
realistically and appropriately.
The community Image Plan was prepared with the
understanding that Southfield wants to improve and
enhance its physical environment, even if the
enhancements will require extra effort in terms of
capital costs, upkeep and maintenance expenditures.
Common, day-to-day housekeeping items, such as
the need to keep streets clean, prune and trim street
trees, pick up litter and debris, and remove weeds and
unsightly vegetation, are assumed to be basic
requirements and are not discussed in this chapter.
However, their importance in presenting a good
community image is critical and must be funded at
appropriate levels.

Community Image 12-1

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Various elements combine to form community
image. In using the Comprehensive Master Plan as a
tool to enhance image, it is important to consider the
issues that shape Southfield's image. The following
questions help to frame the challenges/issues related
to community image:

•

Can the commercial corridors be visually
improved?

•

Should and/or how can the image of Southfield
be improved in the minds of residents and nonresidents?

•

How can the sense of "place" be enhanced?

•

Should neighborhoods be more clearly defined
and identified?

•

How can the entrances (or gateways) to
Southfield be more clearly identified?

•

Do the City, business community and school
district market themselves effectively to existing
and prospective residents (especially families)?

The answer to these questions will help guide actions
related to community image. Some of these issues
are explored in greater detail in the remainder of this
chapter.

who reside in Southfield, as well as those who may
be making an investment or relocation decision.
Simply put, beauty adds value to the community.
The appearance of Southfield is one of the foremost
influences in value and one of its most regarded
assets. Residents take pride in their community and
its attractive and interesting places. Businesses also
like to locate in attractive environments, which
improve their ability to recruit employees, host
clients and investors, and continue to in •;est in their
facilities.
The appearance of Southfield is formed by many
factors. While some areas rely on the beauty of their
natural environment, such as the Rouge River
corridor and its tributaries and open spaces, other
areas must focus their attention toward design of their
public spaces, municipal buildings and infrastructure,
while taking a proactive stance to ensure their land
use standards deliver quality development/
redevelopment outcomes. Without focusing attention
on the quality and sustainability of physical
development, character is left to chance, leaving little
opportunity for the community to control the destiny
of its appearance.

The appearance of Southfield is important to its
livability and its physical and economic development.
Residents, business and property owners recognize
the value of an impressionable community and are
committed to its betterment. They desire welcoming
entryways, attractive corridors, unique and inviting
districts, pleasant and quiet neighborhoods, beautiful
parks and public open spaces, well-kept properties,
and a community presence that exhibits its unending
pride. This is a keen awareness that qualities such as
charm and character do not just happen; rather, they
require the involvement of the whole community to
make improvements - both individually and
collectively - to achieve the overall community
vision.

The image, character and appearance of Southfield
are of top priority according to the community that
participated in the residential opinion survey and key
person interviews and community forums. Residents,
business and property owners, and community
stakeholders recognize the importance of quality of
life in the success of their economic development;
therefore, both desire and expect quality new
development and redevelopment. There is a strong
desire to improve the entrances to the City with
distinctive gateways, enhance the roadway environs
with streetscape improvements, create an identifiable
community center "downtown," add more
landscaping and screening of parking and storage
areas, control the size and location of public and
private signs, incorporate public displays of art and
community history, manage the appearance of
structures and vacant priorities, and diligently enforce
the City's codes.

Southfield's physical character is perhaps the single
most evident glimpse of its economic viability,
government proactiveness and civic pride. The initial
impression of the community is formed by the quality
appearance of its physical development, including the
nature of community aesthetics; condition of
municipal facilities and spaces; amount of public
open space; maintenance of roadways and public
infrastructure; and the overall attractiveness of the
community. The appearance of the community
contributes to quality of life and livability for those

The focus of this Chapter is the character and
appearance of Southfield, which emphasize how the
physical elements of individual corridors and districts
fit together to form a unified whole community. It
also expresses how the framework of the community
ties important locations together and helps orient
people within the community, how new construction
relates to the physical elements already in place, how
districts and neighborhoods are to function and be
designed, and how government processes work to
effectively achieve these goals.

Community Appearance

Community Image 12-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

This chapter also focuses on character and design
issues and is intended as a community image vision
for the future of Southfield. The Community Image
Plan emphasizes the primary attributes of the
community, the features that make it special, the
policies that can preserve its valued assets, and how
character and design may be used to improve
community appearance. This plan is important
because:

•

•
•

•

Sensitive design and development policies can
enhance the livability and quality of life in
Southfield, which strengthens the community's
competitive position.
Good design and quality development increase
property values and, therefore, tax revenues.
A community with character has been demanded
by the public, which articulated their desire for
an enhanced community appearance through
their involvement in the comprehensive master
planning process.
An attractive community is achievable as the
City uses its financial resources, regulatory
means, strategic policy decisions, and its own
sense of design on public projects to influence
private development.

Community Appearance Issues
In conjunction with the Comprehensive Master Plan
Steering Committee, input received from interviews,
meetings with sub-area stakeholders and input from
the Resident Public Opinion Survey, there are a
number of key appearance issues identified, including
the foJlowing:

Development Pattern and Form that Contribute
to Visual Appeal. The evolution of development in
Southfield has radiated from the center of Detroit
with its freeway systems traversing through the City
and a grid street system, with principal arteries
spaced evenly on the mile section lines. As a result
of local and regional traffic patterns and volumes,
higher land values exist adjacent to these
thoroughfares leading to more intensive nonresidential use. Telegraph, Southfield, Greenfield,
Evergreen, and 8 Mile Roads; sections of 9 Mile, I 0
Mile and 12 Mile Roads; and other arterial roadways
have developed or are developing with
commercial/office/service uses. The resulting street
environment is a patchwork of parking lots for each
individual business with, in many cases, multiple
property entry and exit points. Signage for each of
the businesses shares the limited space immediately
adjacent to the street with power and light poles,
sidewalks, traffic devices and street signs, and other
public displays.

Southfield
-=--

Enhanced Corridor Environments. As described
in the previous issue statements, the appearance of
the corridors is perhaps the most significant issue
pertaining to community appearance. After all, these
are the most frequently traveled roadways in the
community, carrying both those who travel them
daily and those who are introduced to the community
for the first time. The appearance of the corridors
may be characterized in two ways. They are
characterized by either their wide street sections or
by varying building setbacks and expames of parking
adjacent to the street, limited provision of green
space or landscaping, multiple points of ingress and
egress interrupting the pedestrian ways, a
proliferation of signs with little consistency as to its
placement and size, and widely varying building
styles and use of materials. Achieving enhanced
corridor environments involves policies, programs,
regulations and incentives addressing each of the
contributing factors. Enhancement of a single factor
will help but will not result in a positive visual
impact. Instead, each of the factors must be handled
together to revitalize and re-establish a desired
character and appearance.
There are two separate, yet related, components
involved in improving the appearance of corridors.
First is the street right-of-way, which is owned and
controlled by the City, Oakland County or the
Michigan Department of Transportation. Within the
public rights-of-way, the design of the pavement
surface, including whether the roadway is undivided
or divided by a raised median, improved with curb
and gutter, or constructed of asphalt or concrete,
contributes to the appearance of the corridor.
Maintenance of the pavement surface, as well as the
open space within the rights-of-way, is also
significant to its visual appeal. The preservation of
natural features, such as vegetation and wetlands, and
provision of green space and landscaping helps to
soften the roadway environs and enhance views. The
design of structures, such as bridges and overpasses,
retaining walls, and drainage improvements, are also
important elements in the overall design scheme.
Each of these improvements is largely at the
discretion of the City in coordination with Oakland
County and Michigan Department of Transportation.
The second component involves private property,
which must be either regulated or provided with
incentives to achieve the desired development
outcomes. Typically, regulations and design
guidelines pertaining to building appearance, signs,
landscaping, screening and buffering, and open space
are applied city-wide or to the properties within a
certain distance of specified corridors. Incentives for
compliance with the standards/guidelines may

Community Image 12-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

include automatic approval, increased density or
intensity, relaxed parking requirements, reduced
dimensional standards, or financial participation
through grants or when done in conjunction with a
public infrastructure improvement.

Preserved Vegetation and Community
"Greenness." Trees and vegetation - or a lack
thereof - contribute significantly to the appearance of
the community. Landscaping is useful in the design
of individual sites, corridors, and districts to enhance
aesthetics, frame quality views, buffer adjacent uses,
and screen activity areas or undesirable views, as
well as serve an important environmental function by
altering the microclimate. Regulations and guidelines
imposed by the City on new development,
redevelopment or building additions should require
preservation of mature trees, as they are commonly
felled during construction and replaced with smal1
caliper trees-if any at all. Furthermore, limited
landscaping within buffer yards, throughout large
parking areas, in the streetscape areas, and around the
perimeter of the site, is more often than not the first
to be lost to project budget woes. As a percentage of
overall project costs, though, the added price of
landscaping is nominal, yet proven to add value and
return to the development. People are naturally
attracted to pleasant environments, whether they are
well-designed neighborhoods, commercial centers, a
downtown district, or public spaces; therefore, the
value of landscaping and open space must not be
overlooked.
Well-defined Community Gateways and District
Portals. Based on the comments received by
residents, business and property owners, and
community stakeholders the appearance of
community entrances is important. They are proud of
their community and would like to continue to
portray a positive first impression on those who visit
or pass through the community for the first time.
Understanding this pride, the City has installed
community entry signs/markers in cooperation with
Lawrence Technological University at select entrance
points to the City. The entry markers identify the
community entrances but these gateways offer further
opportunities to establish an image, convey
community values, and attract attention to local
attractions and destinations.
Southfield is somewhat unique because it has
multiple entrances. Most travelers, other than local
residents, enter the community from the
Lodge/Northwestern highways, the Southfield
freeway , Telegraph Road or I-696. It is
recommended that formal gateway improvements are

focused at these locations, with less significant
entrance treatments at the other arterial roadways.
Entryway enhancements to establish formal gateways
include improvements to the roadways, such as well
designed landscaped medians and landscaped
freeway embankments, significant entry monuments,
upgraded lighting standards, wayfinding signage and
well-maintained and attractive adjacent properties.
In addition to the gateways to the community, there
are also multiple opportunities for enhancement of
special district portals. Examples include notable
areas that distinguish themselves by way of their
character, such as City Centre, Cornerstone
Development Authority (CDA) district, North
Southfield Road corridor, the Telegraph Technology
corridor and individual neighborhoods. Portals to
these districts create identity, form a sense of
belonging for those who visit or live there, and create
additional opportunities for aesthetic enhancement
around the community. The CDA has constructed a
series of portal and wayfinding sign systems in the
district, which could lead as an example and provide
uniformity for other Special District portal
improvements.

Attractive Public Buildings, Spaces and
Infrastructure. The City, Southfield Public School
District, Lawrence Technological University and
other public or semi-public entities and agencies have
the opportunity to lead by example. There are
several models of highly attractive and notable
structures that contribute to the character of the
community. For instance, the Southfield Public
Library, Thompson Farm, The Burgh Historic Park,
The Rouge River corridor, Beech Woods Recreation
Center, Valley Woods Nature Preserve, Carpenter
Lake Nature Preserve and other individual buildings
and neighborhoods are local landmarks that
communicate to the public a message of community
pride and heritage. These facilities , along with
numerous faith-based institutions, must be
acknowledged for their presence and contribution to
the fabric of Southfield by continued diligence in
their upkeep and preservation.
Local landmarks require a substantial investment on
behalf of the City or their sponsoring entity or
agency. These investments pay dividends, not only
in their functional use, but also by way of giving the
community form. The quality of public buildings,
spaces and infrastructure is reflective of how the
community views itself and the priority placed on its
presence within the region and state. It is warranted
for the community to concern themselves with
improvements, as well as their function.

Community Image 12-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Public expenditures often lead to private investment.
For example, streetscape enhancements commonly
result in improvements to adjacent properties. Once
an individual owner commits to upgrade the
appearance and/or redevelopment of their property,
the action tends to spur other improvements and
investments by nearby land or business owners.
While public financial resources are always limited,
increasing the investment will benefit in the longterm by a resulting increase to the tax base and
enhancement of community character and identity.

Community Image Areas
The overall image of the community is derived by the
collective appearance of individual areas. Rather
than evaluating the character and appeal of each
neighborhood or roadway individually, the
community is organized into image areas. See
following Map 12- 1. The design principles and
character improvements described in this chapter
may be applied universally to the framework areas,
which together form the aesthetic fabric of
Southfield.
The image areas include the following:

Corridors. Corridors provide connections for
people, commerce, and infrastructure, as wel1 as
natural river systems. Corridors provide the visual
and functional imagery of the community at large. In
other words, the impression made by the corridors
largely represents the image of the community as a
whole. The design and appearance of Southfield's
corridors is significant in forming a positive
experience and lasting image for those who visit or
pass through Southfield. The general principles for
enhancing the community's corridors include
enclosing or framing each street with the use of the
natural (trees and vegetation) and built (buildings)
environments; arranging buildings and parking areas
to complement the streetscape, placing emphasis on
form, as well as function; balancing the needs of
pedestrians and bicyclists with that of automobiles;
substantially enhancing the overall level of design
quality; and creating an improved visual setting for
local commerce.

(units per acre) and intensity (bulk, scale and height)
of the development, the architectural style, or other
distinctive features and amenities. The general
principles for establishing stronger identities of
Southfield's districts include exploiting their visual
distinctiveness with portal features and treatments
(monuments, fencing, landscaping, signs, etc.);
creating an individual style; enhancing the
streetscape for pedestrian use; and promoting a
common identity through signs and other means.

Gateways and Portals. Gateways and portals are
intended to help create identity for the community as
a whole, as well as each individual district. They are
visual icons that are designed to attract attention and
portray an image or message. For entrants, they are
an introduction to the area. They shape the identity
and form a sense of belonging for those who live or
work within the boundaries of the district. The
physical improvements give form and establish an
edge to the districts.
The general principles used to establish formal
gateways include improvements to the roadways,
such as well designed landscaped medians and
landscaped freeway embankments, significant entry
monuments, upgraded lighting standards, wayfinding
signage and well-maintained and attractive adjacent
properties.
Portals create district identity, form a sense of
belonging for those who visit or live there, and create
additional opportunities for aesthetic enhancement
around the community. The general principle is to
establish portals at entrances to and within the unique
districts by creating a theme/brand that can be
portrayed in the district' s streetscape, gateway
markers, street and pedestrian lighting, etc. by using a
select style of materials, colors, placement, and more.

Districts. Districts represent the places that are
unique and have individual identity. These are the
places that commonly attract people for specific
purposes, such as education, cultural/historic
attractions, shopping, government, public gatherings
employment health care and living. They represent a
common place where people come together for a
variety of reasons. They are each unique in their
physical character by way of their use, the density

~outhfie!Q_

Community Image 12-5

�Map 12-1: Community Image
Southfield Comprehensive Plan

1 Mile R

Community Gateways

District Portals

District / Subarea &amp; Mixed
Use Corridor Improvements
,~ _.... Residential Corridor
Improvements
Freeway Embankment
Improvements
.u....

,.,1,., ....,,;••· Rouge Green Corridor

Telegraph Technology
Corridor

North Southfield
Road Subarea

~

City Centre Subarea

ULJ Cornerstone Development
~ Authority Subarea

0

0.25

0.5

1

•:::::i•=-•••■ Miles

~

!

1 inch equals 3,000 feet

LSL Planning, Inc.

co-r.mcm .y Pl'ann•"II c,n-.,,r.nr

Seotember 2008

0

l!Jl~~P~.~
Data Sources: MCGI ,
City of Southfield

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

13

Design
Guidelines

Introduction
The physical appearance of a site, architecture and
landscape is critical to the success of the Southfield
community. Achieving a healthy and vibrant image
is the goal of these guidelines. They advocate a
strong and consistent site development/
redevelopment design vision for the community. To
ensure that the recommendations of the guidelines are
achievable, these guidelines are intended to be
functionally compatible with and a supplement to the
City of Southfield's Zoning Ordinance. The intent of
the guidelines is to maintain flexibility and
responsiveness to market conditions over time while
still providing the vision and ground rules necessary
for a successful development/redevelopment style
that would span the years. The purpose of these
Design Guidelines is to improve the overall quality of
public and private development/improvement
projects in the community, ensure the compatibility
of development with surrounding land uses, and
enhance pedestrian safety and walkability and
vehicular movement and access within and through
the community.

they do not supersede or modify, the City of
Southfield's Zoning Ordinance. In the event of
conflict or discrepancy between the Design
Guidelines and the Zoning Ordinance, the City
Ordinances prevail. Proposed development will need
to obtain the necessary variances, exceptions,
waivers, etc. from City regulations as aprJlicable.

Site Planning
Building Location and Orientation
Principles
•

■

■

■

Applicability
These Design Guidelines will apply universally to all
public and private development/improvement
projects in the community. The guidelines are
intended to become a part of the development review
process that is discretionary in nature for types of
review that include:
■
■

•
•

Requests for Rezoning
Site Plan Approval
Special Use Approval
Major Rehabilitation of Existing Structures

Mixed-Use
1.

2.
3.
4.

Major rehabilitation shall mean any renovation,
restoration, modification, addition or retrofit of a
structure or site. Major rehabilitation shall not
include routine maintenance and repair of a structure
or feature on the site, such as roof replacement or
general repairs to a parking area or other site feature.

Emphasize pedestrian-orientation in site
planning using appropriately-scaled buildings,
placement and interconnectivity.
Develop an efficient pattern of buildings and
open spaces to concentrate activities, rather than
dispersing them in a manner that requires greater
automobile dependency.
Locate and orient buildings to complement the
orientation of adjacent development.
Coordinate all infrastructure and utility design
and location with utility providers to balance
function and desired aesthetic character of the
plan with efficient maintenance of the utilities.

5.

Coordinate and comprehensively plan the
location of buildings to provide order and
compatibility, avoiding jumbled or confusing
development patterns.
Site buildings to reasonably respond to solar,
wind and other climatic factors.
Locate buildings so that their primary orientation
complements adjacent development.
Orient buildings to frame pedestrian corridors
and access drives, parking areas, open spaces and
on-site amenities.
Discourage long, "barracks-like" strip
commercial configurations.

While the guidelines address the physical design of
different types of land uses and structures, they
encompass large areas of the City. Thus, they are
general in scope and coverage. In some cases, the
Design Guidelines may be more restrictive than, but

Design Guidelines 13-1

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Commercial/Office/Research
1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

7.

8.

9.

Locate satellite (pad site) buildings at street
intersections designed to anchor the comer.
Locate buildings to create and frame plazas and
courtyards.
Orient freestanding satellite pad site building
fronts toward the street or plaza and courtyards.
Link plazas and courtyards to pedestrian
sidewalks and walkways.
Do not "wall-off'' sites from surrounding land
uses.
Provide connectivity and accessibility between
the proposed site development and adjacent land
uses.
Segment large parking lots into smaller parking
courts enclosed and framed by trees to minimize
the perceived scale of the total parking area.
Locate loading docks, trash enclosures and
service areas out-of-view from roadways,
sidewalks and open space amenities.
Provide separate parking areas for delivery
trucks and service vehicles located away from
customer/tenant parking lots and walkways.

Multiple-Family and Single-Family Residential
Attached
I.
2.

3.
4.

Organize buildings to create meaningful and
usable open space areas.
Do not encircle multiple-family and singlefamily attached projects with parking stalJs and
drive aisles. Parking lots should be located in
individual pods or small, defined parking courts.
Vary multiple-family residential building
setbacks to promote streetscape variety.
Compose buildings of simple yet varied planes
to assure compatibility and promote variety in
overall building forms.

5.
6.

Vehicular/Pedestrian Circulation
Principles
•
•

•

2.

3.

4.

Locate single-family detached units to create
streetscape variety and visual interest.
Discourage subdivisions of seemingly identical
units sited with no variation on long,
uninterrupted streets.
Site single-family detached units to mitigate
garage impacts along the street by varying their
locations and orientations.
Stagger the location of single-family units and
garages relative to the street to create different
building patterns.
Minimize building setbacks from streets as
densities increases, while maintaining privacy.

~uthfield

Provide a safe, interconnected and efficient site
circulation systems.
Maximize opportunities for strong balanced
transportation systems for vehicles, pedestrians
and bicyclists.
Create a safe, continuous network of pedestrian
walkways within and between developments, so
pedestrian will be more inclined to safely walk
(rather than drive) between buildings.

Vehicular Access and Circulation
1.

2.

3.

4.

Single-Family Residential Detached
I.

Consider different setbacks to reflect different
product types within the neighborhood.
Connect residential neighborhoods to
commercial centers with sidewalks and open
space areas.

5.

In order to maximize the efficiency of the City' s
street network, major traffic generators should be
located so their primary access is from a
principal or minor arterial.
Large site development/redevelopment should be
located at the intersection of arterial streets so
that access is available for both east/west and
north/south traffic. Primary access points should
be located so non-residential traffic is separated
from the residential street system.
Internal vehicle circulation should provide a
clear and direct path to the principal customer
entrance of the primary building, to outlying pad
sites, and to each parking area.
Every site development/redevelopment will be
required to provide loading and delivery
facilities separate from customer parking and
pedestrian areas. As the size of the development
and the volume of trucks increase, internal
circulation patterns should reflect an increasing
separation between automobile and truck traffic
in order to minimize accidents and congestion.
Where possible, connections should be made to
adjoining parking areas and access to lots
consolidated through the use of shared curb cuts.

Design Guidelines 13-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Pedestrian Access and Circulation
1.

2.

3.

An on-site system of pedestrian walkways
should be designed to provide direct access and
connections to and among the following:
• Primary entrance or entrances to each
building, including pad site buildings.
• Any sidewalks or walkways on adjacent
properties that extend to the boundaries
shared with development.
• Any public sidewalks along the perimeter
streets adjacent to the development.
• Where practicable and appropriate, adjacent
land uses and development, public
parks/open space or the other public or civic
use.
Create opportunities for pedestrian gathering
places throughout the site development using
sidewalks and plaza areas connected to
walkways.
Provide appropriate site furnishings for
pedestrians.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building Architecture
Principles
•

Parking

•

Principles

•

•

•

•

•
•

Parking areas should be designed for a safe and
orderly flow of traffic throughout the site.
Major circulation patterns within parking areas
should be welJ-defined with curbs and
landscaped island and parking spaces along main
circulation drives should be avoided. To the
maximum extent practicable, dead-end parking
areas should be avoided.
Parking should be designed to reduce the scale of
parking areas and siting a portion of the parking
area out of view from the public street.
Clear pedestrian circulation paths and amenity
areas within parking areas should be included
and install landscaping within parking areas to
screen spaces and reduce the overall visual
impact of large parking areas.

1.

2.

3.

4.
5.

2.

Configure developments that accommodate large
anchor tenants to promote convenient parking
and vehicular access, as well as parking lot
visibility.
Locate small shops/offices along the street or
drive edge, with minimum setbacks. As a
general rule, anchor tenant buildings such as
large format retail and supermarkets; however,

Create a consistent architectural theme for all
buildings in the development. Also create
building masses and roof forms that reflect the
architectural style of the development.
Break down larger-scaled buildings into a series
of smaller, pedestrian-oriented components.
Articulate fa&lt;;ades to reduce the massive scale of
large commercial/service/office buildings.
Incorporate architectural features that create
visual interest and easily identifiable entrances.

Building Massing and Roof Form

On-site Parking
1.

this is just a guideline because they often require
visible surface parking for patrons' major
shopping trips.
Parking lots should be well-landscaped,
pedestrian-friendly; adding character to the
streetscape.
Divide surface parking areas into a series of
small, connected lots defined by rows of trees
and walkways that link parking areas to
destinations.
Stagger building setbacks, above mmimum
standards if necessary, to enhance visual interest
along the streetscape.
Do not wrap the perimeters of the developments
with parking lots.

6.

Design all buildings within the development,
including satellite (pad site) buildings and fast
food establishments, to reflect a consistent
architectural style .
Locate higher-intensity satellite building masses
at comers designed to " announce" the entrance
into the development.
Locate higher-intensity building masses toward
the center of building complex. Transition
building height outward and down to adjacent
developments.
Punctuate large building masses with towers
designed as landmark icons.
Segment buildings with a distinguishable base,
middle and cap.
Reduce building mass. Use the following
techniques to diminish the size and scale of
buildings:

•
•

Building step backs
Variation of pitched roof forms and heights

Design Guidelines 13-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

■

7.
8.

9.

Emphasis and variation of building color
and texture

Create roof forms that contribute to the unified
appearance of the development.
Use a consistent roof pitch for all buildings in
the development, designed to unite the entire
complex.
Avoid continuous roof planes. Pitched roof
planes should incorporate articulated roof
elements that may include the following:

13. Create visual rhythms with structural bays that
divide storefronts into a series of repetitive
components. Storefronts should be segmented
with vertically repeating columns/piers.
14. Promote four-sided architecture. Use similar
storefront elements on side and rear building
elevations that are visible from public view.
15. Locate building entrances to be clearly
identifiable. Use the following techniques to
distinguish building entrances:
■

■
■

■
■

Cross gables
Roof monitors
Vertical tower elements
Roof dormers

10. Terminate the top of pitched-roofed buildings
with a distinctive cap. Design roof caps using
the following techniques:

■

■

Grocery Stores and Food Establishments
1.

■
■

■

Support pitched roof eave overhangs with
corbels of brackets.
Sheath pitched roofs with a roofing material
that is complementary to the architectural
style of the building.
Discourage radical roof pitches that create
overly prominent or out-of-character
buildings.

11. Terminate the top of flat-roofed buildings with a
distinctive cap. Design roof caps using the
following techniques:
■

■

■

Terminate the top of flat roofs with a
distinctive cornice and parapet wall.
Distinguish the cornice from the building
fat.;ade, with the corbel forward from the
front plane of the building face to articulate
the cornice.
Top roof parapet walls with a distinctive cap
or coping.

12. Create pedestrian interest at storefront
elevations. Use the following elements to
provide storefront elevation variety and visual
interest:
■
■

■
■
■
■

Arcades
Awnings
Bulkheads
Canopies
Storefront display windows
Transom windows

~uthfield

Use towers and articulated corner elements
to distinguish building entries.
Recess entrances into building fa;ades
sheltering patrons from the elements .
Define building entrances with an awning or
canopy.

2.
3.
4.
5.

6.

7.

8.

Design grocery stores to reflect the architectural
style of the development.
Provide covered entrances and arcades designed
to shelter patrons from the elements.
Provide tower and other elements that function
as orientation features and landmark icons.
Use pitched roof forms to project a neighborly
image.
Break-up pitched roof forms with plane breaks
and roof dormers that segment large roof areas
into smaller components.
Divide grocery store storefront windows with
mullions to create a series of individual
windows.
Design food establishments that reflect the
architectural style of the development and use
building materials and colors that are consistent
with the development' s architectural style.
Use a consistent sign type, sty le, materials, and
illumination source as those used within the
development.

Large Format Retail
1.

2.
3.

4.

Design large format retail buildings to reflect the
architectural style and use consistent building
materials and colors of the entire development.
Encourage elements such as entrance pavilions
to break-up large format architecture.
Encourage covered arcades as single-story
transitional elements to larger-scaled building
masses.
Articulate large format building fa9ades by
accentuating structural piers.

Design Guidelines 13-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

Punctuate building corners with material
changes.
Encourage material changes to create a
distinctive base, middle and top.
Encourage raised planters and landscaping to
screen building fa9ade.
Encourage window openings and awnings to
articulate blank fa9ades.
Design large format retail fa9ades based upon the
following guidelines:
■

•

Minimum storefront height: 16 feet
Minimum percentage of storefront window
area: 25 percent

l 0. If flat roofs are used, terminate the top with a
substantial cornice element.
11 . Design large format accessory structures (i .e. gas
station canopy) to reflect the architectural style
of the large format retail building.

Office/Research/Industrial
1.

2.

3.

The scale and massing of these buildings are
generally large, being more oriented to drivers
than pedestrians. Street-facing fa9ades of
buildings should be highlighted with accent
elements, lighting or other features that aid in
orientation.
Buildings should avoid blank elevations on street
frontages through the use of building fenestration
and architectural details related to the 'structure'
of the building.
The selection of materials and colors should
provide an enduring quality and enhance the
architectural and massing concepts of the
building.

Screen Walls and Trash Enclosures
1.
2.
3.

4.

Install decorative loading area screen walls that
complement the building architecture.
Soften screen walls with landscaping.
Design trash enclosure screen walls to
complement adjacent building architecture in
terms of materials, texture and color.
Locate trash facilities near building service
entrances and easily accessible by service
vehicles.

~outhfield
...

Design Guidelines 13-5

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

14

Stewardship and
Implementation

Introduction
Implementation is the most important part of the
planning process because it is the point at which the
Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan transitions from
policy into practice. Implementation is when general
concepts identified during the course of the Plan
development process take shape and are developed into
actual projects and programs. Goals, objectives, and
recommended actions that are visionary in the Plan are
transformed into detailed regulations, programs, c~pital
improvements, agreements, studies, incentives, and
other types of implementation activity.
Plans that are effective in achieving their goals and
objectives include an implementation framework that
outlines the general strategies, directions, and priorities
of the community. The purpose of this chapter is to
identify a course of policy direction for the community,
which is then used to make specific decisions as to the
actions that must be taken, the department or agency
responsible for the initiatives, the actual process and
timeframe for completion, and the source of funds
necessary to implement the recommendation.
Therefore, the role of the Plan is to form the framework
by which speci fie decisions may be made. Without
strategic direction and an organizational approach,
well-intentioned Plans are commonly unsuccessful in
seeing their vision become reality. To avoid this
outcome, this Stewardship and Implementation Plan
chapter includes an overall strategy that will evolve as
the Plan matures over the course of time.

Tenets of Successful Implementation
Communities successful in implementing their Plans
and achieving the vision are those able to secure:
Commitment. The most important aspect of this
implementation program is the commitment of the
City's leadership. This involves those who are elected
to serve the community including:

•
•

•

The Mayor and City Council.
Those appointed to positions of influence in the
community's development, like the Planning
Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals
Those in positions to guide decisions being made,
such as the City's department directors and staff.

{§out~field

Commitment reaches beyond these individuals;
however, to include those who have a vested interest in
how the community develops. Namely:

•
•
•
•
•

Citizens .
Landowners and developers .
Business owners and managers.
Civic clubs and organizations.
Other key stakeholders.

These are the groups and individuals who will
contribute the resources necessary to achieve the shortrange objectives and long-term visions of the Plan. To
build this constituency of people willing to make this
commitment, this Plan involved the public through a
participation program including, the resident opinion
survey, sub area stakeholder workshops, public
interviews, Comprehensive Master Plan Steering
Committee meetings, and workshops with the City's
appointed and elected officials. This constituency must
be maintained and empowered to implement the Plan.
Credit. It is important for the Plan to be cited for its
role in decision-making and credited for its leads to
success. To ensure successful implementation, all City
departments must embrace the Plan and incorporate its
recommended actions in their annual budgets and work
programs. For example, the Public Works Group may
contribute to its implementation with infrastructure,
such as streets, water and wastewater facilities, and
storm drainage improvements that are consistent with
the Plan's policies and recommendations. The Parks
and Recreation Department may pursue local, state, and
federal funding assistance through land dedication,
partnerships, and grants to systematically expand and
enhance parks, trails, and open space concurrent with
new development and in accordance with the Parks and
Recreation Plan. Each department, staff person, board,
and commission of the City has an obligation to use this
Plan in guiding their decisions and priorities.
Involvement. Citizens were the cornerstone of the
Plan development process. Their involvement is even
more essential to ensure success of the Plan. After all,
they are the ultimate beneficiaries of the Plan's success.
For the Plan to be successfully implemented, it must
continue to enjoy the support and understanding of the
community at large and, specifically, the civic leaders.
Therefore, leaders must pledge their support to maintain
public involvement, community awareness, and a
commitment to uphold the values and policies of the
Plan.

Stewardship and Implementation 14-1

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Effective Guidance. This Plan is designed for use on a
daily basis to guide sustainable practices and economic
development of the community. It is intended to guide
staff in their efforts to manage their individual
departments, annual work programs, and capital
improvement projects. It is also a document that should
be highly visible in the decision-making process of the
governing body, being referenced often as the
community's Comprehensive Master Plan. In addition
to its use by the City, it is also designed for use by the
private sector as they make investment decisions in the
community. The Plan offers the community's
commitment for its future, which must, in tum, offer
businesses and property owners' sufficient confidence
in their decisions. The Plan should be a definitive .
source of information and act as a valuable resource for
both the public and private sectors. The Comprehensive
Master Plan and its components must be used in
reviewing development project proposals, as well as
investing in community infrastructure and provision of
municipal services. The overall community vision,
governing principles, goals and
strategies/recommendation articulated in each element
of the Plan should be referenced in other related studies
and projects to ensure consideration of the Plan in all
essential functions and operations of City government.
Integrative Planning. Opportunities for integrating
the Plan's recommendations into other business
practices and programs of the City, County, and other
government entities are a vital element toward
widespread recognition of the Plan as a decisionmaking tool. For instance, the recommendations should
be widely used in decisions pertaining to infrastructure
improvements; proposed new development and
redevelopment; expansion of public facilities, services
and programs; and the annual capital budgeting process.
The Plan should be referenced often to maintain its
relevance to local decisions and to support the decisions
that are being made.
Regionalism. The City is in the position to coordinate
the implementation tasks associated with this Plan.
However, since the decisions that are made will impact
the County and the larger region, implementation of the
Plan should not rest solely on the City. Instead, the vast
array of stakeholders that will play a role in the future
of the community and region should all participate in its
implementation. Entities such as the city of Southfield,
Oakland County, Southeast Michigan Council of
Government, Southfield School District, and the state
of Michigan should all be heavily involved in varying
capacities toward the implementation of the Plan's
initiatives. Their involvement may be through funding
participation, planning coordination, project
management and administration, regulation and
enforcement, or shared provision of facilities and

services, among other actions. In addition to the
cooperation that currently occurs, a renewed
commitment by each entity to form regional alliances
and partnerships must be formed and sustained to
maximize the benefits of regionalism.

Evaluation and Monitoring. This Plan will require
periodic review and amendment to ensure that the
goals, objectives, and recommendations reflect the
community's changing needs and attitudes. In and of
itself, the Plan is capable of accomplishing very little.
Rather, community leaders and citizens must assume
ownership in the Plan to see that it is successfully
implemented. Great care must be taken to ensure that
the recommended actions of this Plan are viable and
realistic as they relate to the City's adopted and
approved Plans, policies, programs, and budget.
Progress reports provided to the City Council on an
annual basis will be important to allow continuous
monitoring of the Plan's implementation and
accomplishments.
Success. A strategy used by successful organizations is
to seek results early in the implementation process. By
doing so, stakeholders are able to see the benefits of
their involvement. Momentum is a result, which
naturally solicits more involvement by people desiring
to be involved in a successful program. In this
Stewardship and Implementation Plan Chapter, there
are various recommendations that do not bear
significant budgetary obligation. These programs and
activities provide an immediate opportunity to make an
impact on the community and, thus, on the successful
implementation of this Plan.

Organizational Structure
The City has made an investment in the preparation of
this Plan. This investment signals its foresight and
preparedness to find creative solutions to the issues
identified through this process and to proactively
manage its future development, redevelopment,
improvement and enhancement in a wise and fiscaIIy
responsible manner.
This Plan was developed over the course of
approximately two years. The planning process was
designed to involve the community to decide their
preferred future and make commitments to support the
Plan's recommendations and initiatives. With the level
of resources committed by the City and the amount of
effort devoted to the process by residents, there is a
high expectation for its implementation. The Plan is
expected to guide each decision about the physical and
economic development of the community and should
maintain its presence as a "blueprint for a new century"
of Southfield.

Stewardship and Implementation 14-2

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Roles of the Mayor and City Council. The Mayor
and City Council should be the central focus of the
Plan's implementation program. They will be
responsible for deciding and establishing the priorities
and timeframes for tasks. As the governing body, they
are also responsible for consideration of the funding
commitments that will be required to realize the
community's vision, whether it involves capital
improvements, new facilities and expanded services,
additional staffing, more studies, or programmatic
changes such as the City's codes, zoning ordinance and
procedures.
The Mayor and City Council will also play a significant
role in the ability of entities to carry out regulatory,
programmatic, and capital improvements cited in the
Plan. In many cases, the Mayor and City Council will
be offering final approval of projects and their costs
during the budget process. The ability to provide
resources for many of the tasks required to implement
the Plan will rest largely with the Mayor and City
Council.
Many of the tasks presented as action statements may
require the participation of various City departments
and outside partners. The Mayor and City Council can
ensure that departments continue to follow the spirit
and policies of the Plan and implement the needed
actions. Active support of the Mayor and City Council
will also be a strong signal to potential private and
public partners that the elected officials believe in the
merits of the Plan.
The Mayor and City Council are ultimately responsible
for authorizing implementation projects and activities,
as well as ensuring their consistency with the Plan and
its policies. They should direct the Planning
Commission, manage the departmental directors and
staff, and oversee the activities and progress of the
Planning Commission.

Planning Commission as Facilitators. The
momentum that has swelled during the course of this
process should not be allowed to falter once the Plan
has been adopted. Concurrent with the approval of the
Plan, the Mayor and City Council should clearly state
their expectations for the role of the Planning
Commission in the management and oversight of the
Plan's implementation program. As the appointed
commission responsible for the community's
sustainability and development, they may be given the
charge to oversee implementation and become
empowered to make ongoing decisions without
necessitating the Mayor and City Council review at
every decision point. Rather, an annual program of
implementing actions should be established by the

Mayor and City Council, upon recommendation of the
Planning Commission, with adequate resources and
direction to successfully accomplish the program tasks.
The Planning Commission should prepare an Annual
Report of Progress for submittal and presentation to
the Mayor and City Council. The annual report could
precede the Mayor's State of the City address. The
status of implementation for each programmed task of
the Comprehensive Master Plan should be central to
this report. Significant actions and accomolishments
during the past year should be recognized and
recommendations should be made for needed actions,
programs, and procedures to be developed and
implemented in the coming year. The annual report
should be coordinated with the annual budgeting
process to allow recommendations to be available early
in the budgeting process and requests for capital
improvements and major programs to be reviewed.
Several tasks set forth in this Stewardship and
Implementation Plan Chapter shall be the responsibility
of the Planning Commission. The Planning
Commission should complete the preparation of
necessary studies, ordinances, and some programmatic
initiatives prior to submitting to City Council. In other
cases, the Planning Commission should play a strong
role as the "Plan Facilitator;" overseeing the process
and monitoring its progress and results. Together, City
staff and the Planning Commission should be
responsible for ensuring that the Plan impacts daily
decisions and actions by other stakeholders.
Under the umbrella of the Planning Commission may
be a series of technical teams comprised of various City
department directors and staff and/or other boards and
commissions, who provide technical competence in the
following areas:
■

■

Governance. This team shall be responsible for
the necessary coordination with the Mayor and
City Council on tasks requiring their direct
involvement and decisions. They should also
communicate with the technical staff of the
County, school district, and other local, regional,
statewide, or federal agencies and organizations.
Their primary role should be intergovernmental
coordination to ensure projects are consistent with
the objectives and missions of other agencies and
to negotiate amenable terms and agreements, as
necessary. They should also be charged with
identifying opportunities to collaborate on projects
that may be jointly funded, constructed or operated.
Infrastructure - Any improvement or project
dealing with infrastructure should require the
attention and effort of this team. The members of
the team should require technical knowledge and

Stewardship and Implementation 14-3

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

•

•

•

expertise with utility and other infrastructure
systems, as well as with their means and methods
of funding . They should work closely with each of
the other technical teams to coordinate needed
infrastructure improvements.
Economic Development. This technical team
should play an active role in pursuing projects that
contribute to the community' s economic
development. They should coordinate the tasks of
the other technical teams in a manner that will
benefit existinob business and new investors in the
.
community, as well as assist in the implementation
of the sub area plans.
Planning. This technical team should be a
workino arm of the Planning Commission,
assumi~g the responsibility for implementing their
projects and initiatives. They should ~oo~dinat~
closely to maintain a line of commumcat10n with
the community to monitor shifting priorities and
needs. For instance, the team should facilitate the
code redrafting process, acting in a role to gauge
the public' s acceptance of new requirements and
restrictions.
Livability. This is the technical team that should
be responsible for taking on the implementation
initiatives for such projects and improvements as
parks and public open space, trails and bikeways,
gateways and corridor enhancement, and overall
community appearance.

While the Stewardship and Implementation Plan
Chapter is a beginning, the Planning Co_mmiss~on may
be charged with the role of honing specific actions
beyond the information provided in the Plan. The
Planning Commission would determine methods o~
programs to be used to implement the proposed actions,
specifically identifying which agencies and/or
departments will be responsible for their
implementation, estimating costs, identifying pr~posed
sources of funding, and establishing timeframes m
which the recommended actions would be
accomplished.

An Ongoing Role for Residents . Citizens of
Southfield contributed ideas and comments during the
Plan's development process that were incorporated and
shaped the resulting proposals and recommendations.
Citizens should continue to be involved in
implementation and maintenance of the Comprehensive
Plan. The Planning Commission, stakeholder groups,
public meetings and community workshops, ~ublic_
forums, newsletters, media releases, and public notices
are all media that should be used to inform and involve
citizens in the planning process. Actual methods and
activities for public participation should be carefully

Southfield

chosen and structured to yield meaningful and effective
involvement.

Accountability is Essential
In order for the Plan to sustain its level of influence in
the community's decision-making processes, there must
be an implementation structure that requires . . .
accountability. Without a system of accountab1hty, 1t
will be difficult to evaluate and monitor the status of
individual initiatives, as well as the overail success of
the implementation program. A means of regular
reporting will be necessary to mainta!n constan~
communication between each of the 1mplementmg
bodies. Regular and periodic status reports will allow
continuous monitoring and modifications to account for
unforeseen circumstances.
A good plan is one that continues to reflect the current
conditions and character of the community. As new
issues arise, the Comprehensive Master Plan will
require modifications and refinements to remain
relevant and resourceful. Over time, some action
statements will be found impracticable or outdated,
while other plausible solutions will emerge.
Refinements and changes should occur consistently, but
with minor changes occurring annually and more
sionificant
modifications taking place every five years.
b
In some cases, simple changes to action statements may
be necessary. In others, entire goals may need to be
modified. Even the overall vision of the Plan should be
consistently scrutinized to ensure that it is reflective of
the hopes and needs of the community.

Annual Plan Evaluations. Plan evaluations will
provide the opportunity for regular review and
preparation of minor Plan updates and revisions, such
as changes to future land use, implementation of
actions, and review of Plan consistency with ordinances
and regulations. Plan evaluations should be prepared
and distributed in the form of an appraisal report, with
recommendations for necessary amendments to the
Comprehensive Master Plan. Identification of potential
Plan amendments should be an ongoing process by the
Planning Commission, as well as City staff, throughout
the year. Proposed Plan amendments resulting from an
evaluation report should be reviewed and recommended
by the Planning Commission and adopted in a ma~er
similar to the Plan itself. This process inc1udes public .
hearings and consideration of action by the Planning
Commission and City Council.
Evaluation and Appraisal Report. Evaluation and
appraisal reports should be prepared every five years,
and follow Section 5.59-Comprehensive Master Plan
Procedures, Article 4-General Provisions of the City ' s
Zoning and Planning Code. Each report will ensure
Stewardship and Implementation 14-4

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

renewal and continued use of the Plan by the Planning
Commission, Mayor, City Council, and staff. Annual
evaluations and resulting Plan amendments from the
previous four years should be incorporated into the next
Plan update. The result of the evaluation and appraisal
report will be a revised Comprehensive Master Plan for
the City, including identification of new or revised
information that may result in an updated vision,
policies, goals, objectives, and action statements.

Intergovernmental relationships can
help improve cooperation by:

Intergovernmental Cooperation

•

Intergovernmental cooperation refers to any
arrangement between two or more jurisdictions, such as
the city of Southfield, Road Commission for Oakland
County and other County agencies, the Southfield
School District, the state of Michigan, and other
governmental or non-governmental public agencies to
communicate visions and coordinate Plans, policies,
and programs to address and resolve issues of mutual
interest. It may be as simple as regularly sharing
information or it may involve entering into
intergovernmental agreements to share resources, such
as buildings, facilities and equipment, staff, and
revenue. In some communities, it has evolved into
consolidation of services and jurisdictions.
Intergovernmental cooperation is becoming more
important as each jurisdiction struggles with increased
service demands and limited resources. Issues tend to
be common across jurisdictional boundaries, affecting
more than one community or region. Improved mobility
means that people, money, and resources move freely
across jurisdictions. For instance, those traveling to and
through Southfield use a network of transportation
routes and modes, which include those that are owned
by a variety of other jurisdictions including the Road
Commission for Oakland County and the Michigan
Department of Transportation. Therefore, it is essential
that there is communication and coordination between
entities to provide the infrastructure and services
necessary to function effectively. Frequently, the
actions of one jurisdiction impact others. Increasingly,
jurisdictions are acknowledging that vital issues are
regional, rather than local, in nature. Watersheds and
other ecosystems, economic conditions, land use,
transportation patterns, housing, and the effects of
growth and change are issues that cross the boundaries
of the community and impact not only Southfield, but
also Oakland County and the larger region. The
economic health of Southfield and its larger region are
innately interconnected, meaning that the success of
one is largely dependent on and, thus, responsible for
the success of all.

•

•

•

•

Benefits of Cooperating
As introduced above, there are widely ranging benefits
of cooperation some of which include:

•

•

•

•

•

~outhfield

Providing an opportunity and
reason for communicating with
other jurisdictions and agencies.
Getting jurisdictions thinking about
the intergovernmental impacts of
their actions.
Offering a forum for discussing
intergovernmental issues and
resolving conflicts.
Helping to ensure that the
community's actions are consistent
with those of other governmental
jurisdictions and agencies.
Providing ongoing opportunities for
cooperation as the Plan is
implemented, monitored, and
updated.

Cost Savings. First and foremost, cooperation can
and does save money by increasing efficiency and
avoiding unnecessary duplication of services. It
may also offer opportunities to provide facilities
and services that may not be possible to provide
individually, such as recreation/sports facilities and
other major capital investments.
Solving Larger Issues. There are many issues that
are beyond the control of each individual
jurisdiction and require cooperation to address.
Examples of these issues may include such things
as major transportation improvements, and
economic development, among others.
Predictability. Decisions and outcomes that are
predictable are of great benefit to residents,
businesses, land owners, and others. Any
opportunity to coordinate to resolve potential
disputes or conflicts with other jurisdictions that
may impact the community will save time and
money.
Mutual Understanding. As jurisdictions work
together and become more acquainted with the
vision and preferred outcomes of other entities,
they may work together to achieve common goals
and interests.
Enhanced Public Service. Those who benefit the
most from intergovernmental relationships are their
Stewardship and Implementation 14-5

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

constituents. Increased and improved services may
be provided at reduced cost when jurisdictions
eliminate duplication and work together.

•

Implementation
This Comprehensive Master Plan is intended as a
working document that will impact the way the
community manages sustainability and economic
development.
The intent of the implementation program is to achieve
the goals and objectives that embody the City' s
commitment, which is the result of this intensive effort.
While the primary responsibility for implementation
rests with the City Council, it must involve a host of
other individuals and agencies working in partnership
to be successful. The Plan may be implemented in the
following ways:

•

•

•

•

•

Updating Regulations. The Comprehensive
Master Plan includes recommendations for
amending the current development ordinances to
accomplish the community vision. The Plan may
be used as the policy framework to support these
changes and the decisions resulting from the new
or revised regulations.
Land Use Decisions. Every decision City Council
makes will affect the community's land use,
whether it is the improvement of infrastructure,
sustainable policies, or economic development
incentives. This Plan may be used to guide these
decisions, as well as those that are made in
response to development proposals.
Capital Improvements. The Plan may be used to
coordinate the provision of public facilities and
services and for establishing priorities and
timeframes for municipal investments and
improvements. It is essential that there is close
coordination between infrastructure improvements
and the City' s Future Land Use and Sub Area Plans
in order to effectively manage development.
Economic Incentives. The City's Future Land
Use Plan should be used as a basis for deciding
economic incentives, thereby encouraging
businesses to locate in areas or select sub areas.
Infill development areas and redevelopment sites
should receive incentives, to direct new economic
opportunities in areas that can be efficiently
serviced by existing infrastructure.
Private Investments. Land owners and
developers may use the Plan in making decisions
about private investments to ensure that new
development is consistent with the Future Land
Use Plan and compatible with existing
neighborhoods and establishments.

•

Personnel. Successful implementation of this Plan
will impact requirements for staffing. Since the
current staff is fully occupied with ongoing
responsibilities, new or redefined positions are
warranted to concentrate sufficient attention to the
Plan' s recommendations.
Funding. Implementation of the Plan will require
adequate funding , which may come from current
revenue sources, a dedicated funding source, or
outside grant funds from the state and federal
governments. Annual appropriations and capital
improvement funds will likely require reallocation
to implement the Plan' s recommendations.

Action Plan
The Action Plan outlined below includes the individual
tasks that should be accomplished within the next 20
years. The priorities are established by the identified
timeframe. To ensure accountability, a lead agency is
identified, who may coordinate with other agencies to
accomplish the task, but who is ultimately responsible
for its timely and successful implementation. A primary
implementation mechanism is also identified, which
may be matched with other state funds , grants,
dedications, and in-kind services.

Some of the recommendations and strategies are
actively being accomplished by various City
departments and should be continued and/or
supported to further advance the Plan's successful
implementation.

Stewardship and Implementation 14-6

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Plan Recommendation

Implementation
Mechanism *

Primary
Responsibility

**

Short Term/
i\Iid Term/
Long Term
Priority

Housing and Neighborhoods

Target key opportunity sites for higher density residential
redevelopment. The City should look into key areas to
consolidate properties to channel development into these areas,
which may involve rezoning for higher density residential.
Promote larger lot, housing opportunities in the northern and
western sections of the City by continuing to support zoning
regulations for such development and to preserve and protect
areas natural features and character.
Continue to investigate and prepare a Home Occupation
Ordinance and any necessary code revisions to accommodate
homeowners the use of their primary residence as a place of
business.
Keep revising building codes to accommodate changes in
community demographics and be sufficiently flexible to meet
the greater diversity of resident's needs for health, safety, well
being, sustainable development and age in place.
Establish a private/public partnership to develop a
manufacturing incubator program and facility in an industrial
district along Eight Mile Road.
Promote awareness of housing programs and services for special
groups such as low to moderate-income households, ageoriented population, physically challenged and families in need
of child and adult day care.
Develop and organize a neighborhood round table with
representatives from block clubs and neighborhood associations
to discuss organization and improvement initiatives.
Continue to provide incentives for property owners to maintain
and enhance their property. Provide low interest loans to
property owners for property improvements and promote
property maintenance education. Provide tool rental vouchers to
homeowners to help offset the costs of do-it-yourself
improvement projects and provide loans to age-oriented
homeowners to help them manage repairs and improvements to
their homes.
Keep improving the housing stock by working with public and
private agencies. Rehabilitate, or if necessary, demolish
identified distressed properties to prevent further deterioration
of the neighborhood and maintain home ownership. Establish a
pilot housing project that is more sustainable, healthy, durable
and energy efficient.
Define neighborhoods based on their character and/or history by
developing specific neighborhood improvements (i.e. ,
landscape, entry markers, parks/open space, etc.)
Continue to inventory blighted houses and establish programs to
rehabilitate or remove them.
Neighborhoods will include pedestrian and bike paths that are
interconnected with a community-wide pathway system.

~outhfield
., ·,
,.

Zoning Ordinance

PC
HC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

CIP

BUD
CE
PD

Short Term

CIP

EDC

Short Term

HC

Mid Term

CR

Short Term

HD

Short Term

HUD

HD

Short Term

CDBG

PWG

Mid Term

GIS

BUD
CE

Short Term

SAFETEA-LU

PWG

Mid Term

MSI-IDA
HUD

CIP

MSI-IDA
HUD

MSI-IDA

Stewardship and Implementation 14-7

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Plan Recommendation

Implementation
Mechanism *

Primary
Responsibility

**

Short Term/
l\lid Term/
Long Term
Priorit)'

Recreation and Natural Resources

•

Continue to implement the current Parks and Recreation Plan
with regular updates every five years.
Work with Oakland County and the State to develop and
promote the Rouge Green Corridor as a natural corridor of
scenic value, recreational and educational opportunities of
diverse natural resources.
Convert appropriate vacant, City-owned parcels into pocket
parks or neighborhood playgrounds.
Provide incentives for developers to incorporate open space into
their project.
Continue to modernize existing park facilities through upgrades
in design, equipment, barrier free accessibility, uniform
entrance/directional/interpretive signs and landscaping to keep
parks safe and attractive.
Explore even more funding opportunities for park
improvements.
Improve the monitoring of recreation programs and fees to
ensure they meet the desires of residents and accommodate
enrollment figures through surveys, focus groups and/or
assessment of current enrollment fees to ensure affordability for
area residents and cover department costs .
Keep abreast of the latest trends in recreation programs and
facilities through the national and local Recreation and Park
Association's programs and events.
Expand and introduce single adults, age-oriented population
and multi-generational programs and events
Continue to prohibit clear cutting of large stands of trees and/or
require relocation of significant/mature specimens to public
open spaces.
Keep developing tree replacement and planting programs for
parks, road corridors and open spaces that will improve overall
quality of life.
Continue to use technology, such as GIS maps and other tools to
inventory woodlands and wetlands.
Continuously and diligently pursue regulations of natural
resources. Establish city-wide sustainable policy ordinances.
Implement programs to maintain and improve natural areas
through partnerships with local citizens, agencies and
businesses.

CIP

PR

Short Term

MNRTF
LWCF

PRB

Short Term

CIP

PRB

Long Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Mid Term

CIP

PR

Short Term

CIP

PRB

Short Term

CIP

PR

Mid Term

CIP

PR

Mid Term

CIP

PRB

Mid Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

MPG

PWG

Mid Term

GIS

PWG

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC
PR

Short Term

CIP

PWG

Mid Term

CIP

EDC

Mid Term

Zoning Ordinance
ULA

MCC
BD

Short Term

Business and Economy
Coordinate with area businesses and the Southfield School
District to encourage job creation and retention for young
adults.
Make efforts to retain and encourage the expansion of large
institutions and employment centers including local universities
and hospitals.

Southfield
/,'
-

~

Stewardship and Implementation 14-8

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

I

Plan Recommendation
Continue to implement Wi-Fi high-speed, broadband Internet
access throughout the entire community.
Work with SMART to improve transportation services and
facilities to the City' s major business sub area districts and
corridors.
Combine effort and resources of the City and the City Centre
Advisory Board to develop a private/public partnership to
implement the City Centre sub area plan.
Reinstate business roundtable meetings with private sector
leaders and realtors in the corridors and sub area districts.
Organize collaborative market programs and identify top
priority development and redevelopment sites.
Organize a focus group of technology business owners and
Lawrence Technological University to develop a technology
market initiative.
Examine the feasibility of creating a Corridor Improvement
Authority for Telegraph Road, Southfield Road and City
Centre ' s sub area districts.
Organize the faith-based institutions and organizations in
promoting and facilitating neighborhood economic development
and services to area residents to find quality jobs.
Acquire and implement business needs assessment database
software (Synchronist, Executive Pulse, etc.) tc respond to
employer's needs.
Encourage home businesses in areas where they will not detract
from their surroundings.
Develop a business forum to discuss business retention and
expansion programs to resolve problems and grow locally. Use
the local cable network and a business assistance portal on the
City's Web site to increase awareness of available local, county
and state business incentives and assistance programs, existing
business expansion and new business attraction efforts.
Prepare market-oriented development package materials,
including site identification, incentives, workforce skills. These
packages would target office employers, technology businesses
and retail and consumer service businesses.
Continue to address scattered land use patterns, inadequate
commercial lot sizes, high building vacancy rates, poor building
conditions, and traffic issues through updated land use
arrangements and policies.
Continue to concentrate compatible commercial uses into sub
area districts and select corridors where residential areas can
provide a base of support. Promote compatible mixed-use and
infill residential or office for those areas between the
commercial and residential areas.
Continue to update applications/forms and site plan review
procedures to streamline approvals to encourage desired
development and redevelopment.

~outhfield_
I

Tl•

Implementation
Mechanism *
Franchise
Agreement

Primary
Responsibility

**

Short Term/
i\lid Term/
Long Term
Priorit)'

FSG

Short Term

TEDF
SAFETEA-LU

MCC

Long Term

CIA
BID/PSD
ULA

CCAB

Short Term

BD

CIP

CR

Short Term

CIP

BD

Short Term

CIP

BD

Short Term

CIP

HD

Long Term

CIP

BD

Mid Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

CIP

MCC
CR

Short Term

CIP

BD
CR

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Mid Term

PC

Long Term

BUD
CE
PD

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

BID

Zoning Ordinance

Stewardship and Implementation 14-9

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Plan Recommendation
Promote adaptive reuse of buildings through use of
redevelopment overlay districts that offer flexibility in
regulations.
Keep participating in a regional economic development
consortium to seek out and pursue economic development
opportunities that will diversify and strengthen the economic
market.
Encourage the Southfield Community Foundation to increase its
financial assets and designate economic and community
development as its top financial investment priority. The
Foundation should sponsor a reunion of former Southfield
graduates that could spearhead economic development
initiatives.
Reorganize the Southfield Chamber of Commerce mission to
strengthen its services to local businesses and contribute in a
more defined way to support local economic development
programs.

Implementation
Mechanism *

Primary
Responsibility

**

Short Term/
Mid Term/
Long Term
Priority

Form-Based Code

PC

Mid Term

CIP

BD

Short Term

CIP

SCF

Mid Term

CIP

BD

Short Term

MNRTF
LWCF

PR

Long Term

PWG , PD,PR

Mid Term

PWG

Mid Term

SRS

PWG

Mid Term

CIP

PWG

Short Term

CIP

PWG

Short Term

CIP

PWG

Long Term

CIP

PWG

Short Term

CIP

MCC

Short Term

CIP

PWG

Mid Term

CIP

PWG

Long Term

CIP, TEDF,
BID/PSD, TIFA

EDC, Other

Mid Term

CIP

PWG

Mid Term

CIP

PWG

Short Term

Transportation and Infrastructure
Link neighborhoods, commercial/mixed use districts, cultural,
civic facilities , schools, higher education facilities and other
destinations through parks, open space and pathways.
Prepare a city-wide non-motorized transportation master plan
Continue to work with local road authorities, to coordinate
signalization and light-timing.
Implement a "Safe Route to School" program at elementary and
middle schools.
Reduce storm water runoff and low-impact development
techniques for storm water management.
Provide regular maintenance of water and sewer infrastructure.
Capitalize on utility and transportation corridors to create a
linear open space system.
Continue planning, design, construction and repairs of sanitary
sewer facilities .
Educate all water users to practice water conservation
techniques.
Support the addition of renewable energy to the current energy
portfolio and sustainable design of City structures.
Separate turning movements at high volume intersections and
provide right turn lanes to minimize crashes and improve traffic
flow.
Enhance primary and secondary gateways.
Implement access management techniques and promote efficient
circulation.
Implement an intersection hierarchy to prioritize improvements
on large volume roads.

~outhfiel~

SAFETEA-LU
CIP

Stewardship and Implementation 14-10

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Plan Recommendation
Continue to inventory existing road conditions and properly
plan for maintenance, improvement or reconstruction as
necessary.
Improve the public transportation system through transit
shelters, expanded routes and schedules, and transit-oriented
development.
Incentivize transit-oriented, pedestrian-friendly development
along existing or proposed transit routes.
Incentivize mixed-use development to encourage transportation
mode shift and reduce vehicle miles traveled city-wide.
Require wide pathways along the frontage of new development
with internal, connected sidewalks.
Pursue creation of new/additional corridor improvement
authorities/fIFA/CDA districts to enhance public and private
realm aesthetics along key corridors and at key gateways.
Amend zoning ordinance with access management standards for
arterials and collectors in Southfield.
Prepare access management corridor plans for identified
problem corridors in the City.
Establish process and assign responsibility for regular
coordination with area communities and groups to identify
opportunities for regional paths and connections.
Pursue grants and other funding to construct pathways along
state/federal roads, where practical and in conjunction with
improving Southfield's image along freeways.
Update city standards to require preparation of traffic impact
studies large developments.
Aggressively pursue grants to construct critical pathway
connections and public amenities.
Community Facilities and Culture
Support community heritage and diversity through development
of interpretive information centers located in community
facilities throughout the City.
Support and communicate heritage and ethnic appreciation days,
holidays and festivals to encourage participation by the entire
community.
Work with Southfield School District to plan for school closings
and/or school expansion programs.
Monitor the efficiency of the City's various departments to
prevent any duplication of work and ensure consistent
application of policies.
Regularly engage the community on civic activities and events.
Require coordinated landscaping and site design that will relate
municipal buildings to one another and to the overall
community.
Incorporate wayfinding signs that signify areas of interest
throughout the City.

~puthfield

Implementation
Mechanism *

Primary
Responsibility

**

Short Term/
I\lid Term/
Long Term
Priority

GIS

PWG

Short Term

CIP

PWG

Long Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Long Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Mid Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

TIFA, DDA, CIA,
PSD/BID

BD, PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

CIP, CIA, MDOT

PWG/PC

Short Term

Coordination

PR

Mid Term

CIP, SRS, MDOT

PR, PWG

Mid Term

City Code

PC,PWG

Short Term

CIP, MDOT

PR

Short Term

CIP

CR

Short Term

CIP

CR

Short Term

CIP

MCC
PC

Short Term

CIP

FSG

Mid Term

CIP

CR

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

MCC

Mid Term

CIP

PWG

Mid Term

Stewardship and Implementation 14-11

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Plan Recommendation
Enhance the night life experience by encouraging a diversity of
entertainment-related businesses.
Establish a Town Square at the municipal complex and City
Centre that includes a traditional downtown, public fountains
and other amenities.
Establish a regulating plan for areas designated for a more urban
character.
Develop building form standards and design standards that
enhance existing architecture.
Continue to design public spaces and streetscapes to attract
pedestrians and enhance vitality.
Require safescaping measures that reduce visual barriers to
police - such as opaque fencing, walls, and dense vegetation.
Continue to promote programs that help residents prepare for
natural disasters and emergency situations.
Keep offering educational programs on the importance of water
quality protection and recycling in our community.
Keep developing facilities such as a community kitchen, farmers
market, community gardens or community farms where
residents can participate and learn about healthy living.
Continue to establish learning opportunities for our age-oriented
(senior) citizens.
Continue to promote the new youth center and coordinate with
schools to provide a comprehensive after school program.
Step up the participation in Walk! Michigan.
Continue to establish community healthy living programs that
present Southfield as a premier healthy community in the
region.
Continue to work with area human service agencies to provide
needed services to residents.

Implementation
.Mechanism *

Primary
Responsibility

**

Short Term/
Mid Term/
Long Term
Priority

Zoning Ordinance

BD

Mid Term

TIF
CIA
PSD

CCAB
PR

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Mid Term

Form-Based Code

PC

Long Term

SAFETEA-LU

PWG

Short Term

SAFETEA-LU

PC

Mid Term

CIP

MCC

Short Term

CIP

MCC

Short Term

MNRTF

MCC

Mid Term

SCF

MCC

Mid Term

SCF

SCF

Short Term

CIP

CR

Mid Term

CIP

MCC

Short Term

CIP

HS

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Mid Term

Future Land Use

Establish regulatory incentives that encourage energy
conservation and use of green technology or LEED™
certification as part of site and building
development/redevelopment projects.
Step up the planning and zoning of small areas of neighborhood
commercial uses at main intersections near neighborhoods to
provide goods and services.
Continue to foster the revitalization and redevelopment of
existing uses or areas which have become obsolete or are
showing signs of aging.
Keep eliminating non-conforming uses and incompatible land
use patterns in accordance with the plan.
Continue to allow local institutions such as schools and
churches to develop within neighborhoods provided they
maintain a scale and intensity with minimal traffic impacts.

i.§outhfi_e ld

Stewardship and Implementation 14- 12

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Plan Recommendation
Maintain creation of commercial and office development
patterns that are grouped in strategic locations along corridors
with high density residential development.
Continue to require buffering, in the form of vegetation and
attractive fencing for new development that is in conflict with
adjacent land uses.
Continue to use transitional zoning to minimize land use
conflicts, so that high intensity uses are surrounded by gradually
less intense uses.
Provide large scale regional commercial mixed use development
at the City Centre without adverse impacts on traffic flow or
nearby neighborhoods.
Keep encouraging senior housing, providing a full continuum of
care, in mixed-use areas near commercial nodes or retail and
service centers.
Continue to use City incentives and sources of funding to
stimulate development and redevelopment of corridors and sub
areas.
Continue to monitor the State's "Brownfield" incentive
programs to encourage development/redevelopment of
contaminated and obsolete sites.
Incorporate land use and development strategies from
Cornerstone Development Authority's strategic planning efforts.
Continue to ensure site design reflects the quality and character
of Southfield by updating Zoning Ordinance and City Codes,
and approval of Community Design Guidelines.
* Implementation Mechanisms:
BRA - Brownfield Redevelopment Authority
BID/PSD - Business Improvement District/Principal Shopping
District
CDBG - Community Development Block Grant
NEZ - Neighborhood Enterprise Zone
CIP - Capital Improvements Plan
TIFA - Tax Increment Financing Authority
ODA - Downtown Development Authority
SA - Special Assessment
MNRTF - Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund
LWCF - Land and Water Conservation Fund
CIA - Corridor Improvement Authority
MPG - Michigan Natural Resources Tree Planting Grants
LDFA - Local Development Financing Act
MSHDA - Michigan State Housing Development Authority
HUD - Housing and Urban Development
PT A - Property Tax Abatement
ULA - Urban Land Assembly Program
SRS - Safe Routes to School Program
TEDF - Transportation Economic Development Fund

Implementation
Mechanism *

Primary
Responsibility

**

Short Term/
Mid Term/
Long Term
Priorif)'

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

CCAB

Mid Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Mid Term

PTA
SA
ULA

MCC
BD

Short Term

BRA

BD

Short Term

CDA

CDA

Short Term

Zoning Ordinance

PC

Short Term

FSG - Fiscal Services Group
HD - Housing Department
MDOT- Michigan Department of Transportation
PR - Parks &amp; Recreation
PD - Planning Department
PWG - Public Works Group
SAFETEA-LU - Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users

** Commission, Corporation and Authority Abbreviations:
MCC - Mayor &amp; City Council
PC - Planning Commission
ZBA - Zoning Board of Appeals
CCAB - City Centre Advisory Board
CDA - Cornerstone Development Authority
HC - Housing Commission
EDC - Economic Development Corporation
PRB - Parks &amp; Recreation Board
SCF - Southfield Community Foundation

** Department/Agency Abbreviations:
BD - Business Development
BUD - Building Department
CE - Code Enforcement
CR - Community Relations

Stewardship and Implementation 14- 13

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Implementation Tools

Zoning Ordinance Review

This section of the Chapter will summarize the
various recommendations into a checklist to outline
actions and responsibilities for implementation.
Tools to implement the Comprehensive Master Plan
generally fall into these categories:

A review of the City' s Zoning Ordinance and map
was completed to identify potential changes to
implement recommendations of this Comprehensive
Master Plan. The review only suggests potential
changes based on the plan, it does not evaluate the
Zoning Ordinance for specific issues, problems,
interpretations and compliance with current laws,
legislation and case law.

•

Land use regulations derived from police
powers.

•

Capital improvement programs derived from
budgetary powers.

1.

Each tool has a different purpose toward Plan
implementation. Some suggest specific short term
priorities, some are medium term policies and others
involve on-going activities. The key tools are
described below.

,~.,~ 1"~'"'

Land Use Regulations
The primary tools for Plan implementation, such as
the Zoning Ordinance and other land use regulations,
are summarized below. The City also has a number
of other codes and ordinances to ensure that activities
remain compatible with the surrounding area, such as
noise, blight and nuisance ordinances and to control
impacts on the environment and infrastructure.

Zoning Map. The intent is that changes to the
zoning map over time will gradually result in better
implementation of the objectives encouraged in the
Future Land Use Map. In some cases, the City may
wish to initiate certain zoning changes as part of an
overall zoning map amendment. Other changes to
the zoning map will be made in response to requests
by landowners or developers. In those cases, City
officials will need to determine if the time is proper
for a change. A key point to remember is that the
future land use plan is a long range blueprint:
implementation is expected, but gradually in response
to needs, conditions and availability of infrastructure.
Zoning Regulations. Zoning regulations control the
intensity and arrangement of development through
standards on lot size or density, setbacks from
property lines, building dimensions and similar
minimum requirements. Various site design elements
discussed in this Plan are also regulated through the
site plan review process, which addresses overall site
design for items such as landscaping, lighting,
driveways, parking and circulation, access
management, pedestrian systems and signs. Zoning
can also be used to help assure performance in the
protection of environmentally sensitive areas such as
floodplains, state regulated wetlands and woodlands.

(§outhfie~.ct

Overall Organization. The City should
consider a comprehensive revision to the
ordinance. There have been major advancements
in the organization and structure of Zoning
Ordinances that make these documents more
user-friendly to the public and easier for the City
to administer.

.
1

3 stones ma"

I

35 11 max

height

I
T

10ftm-; i
rear vara !
I

!

.,___..,___..._ _ - --iI

Oftm,n
ioeyar::l

wi:,rewal!

2.

Zoning Map Changes. Areas on the Future
Land Use Map that call for different land uses
than are allowed under current zoning should be
reviewed by the Planning Commission. Where
there are differences, the City should review the
zoning designations as compared to the Future
Land Use Map to see what rezonings are
appropriate for the City to initiate upon adoption
of the Plan and which are more appropriate at a
later time or at the property owner's request.
Rezoning requests, either City initiated or from
an applicant, shall use both the maps and text in
the Future Land Use Plan as a guide.
The graphic on the following page identifies
areas where the current zoning is different from
the Future Land Use Plan. Most of these areas
are located within the sub areas. It is
recommended that the City consider developing

Stewardship and Implementation 14-14

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Figure 14-1: Differences between Current Zoning and Future Land Use

specific zoning districts or overlays for each of
the sub areas to outline the unique range of uses
and the special design character of each.

The Southfield Zoning Ordinance does not
address home occupations. As discussed in the
Future Land Use Chapter, regulations on home
occupations should be added that regulate the
types of businesses that can be conducted within
residential districts. Today' s business climate
lends itself to people working out of their homes,
and most communities accommodate it, with
some parameters to ensure the residential nature
of the neighborhood is protected. To accomplish
this, regulations should be developed that ensure
the residential character of the neighborhood
remains by limiting things such as traffic
generated, signage, lighting, parking, number of
employees, etc.

A form based code, a zoning approach which
focuses less on permitted uses, but more on
building size, shape, and location within a site,
should be considered for the City Centre sub
area. A form based code would have detailed
design standards to direct building form and
relationship to the street in a manner that will
achieve the desired environment.

Single-Family Residential Districts. Southfield
has a number of single-family residential
districts with minimal differences. For example,
R- 1 through R-4 Districts permit the same uses
and have the same required lot area and width
with only slight setback differences. Some of
these districts could be combined to simplify the
ordinance.

3.

, Southfield
.&gt;

- -

4.

Multiple-Family Residential Districts. The
multiple family districts regulate density based
upon number of rooms, which can be
counterproductive toward the goal of more
Stewardship and Implementation 14- 15

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

5.

6.

owner-occupied condominiums as opposed to
rental apartments. Instead, the City should
consider establishing a base number of units per
acre, regardless of number of rooms per unit.

exchange for higher quality development. PUD
developments can accomplish the following:

In addition, the appearance of multiple family
developments could be enhanced through the
addition of building regulations that set
maximum length of buildings and require
architectural features to break up long expanses
of blank walls.

•
•

•
•

•

•

Encourage compact, pedestrian-oriented
environment. Currently districts require
large front yard setbacks that encourage
front yard parking lots.
Permit mixed-use buildings along select
corridors such as Telegraph, Southfield,
Evergreen, and Greenfield Roads.
Encourage development to be transit and
pedestrian oriented especially along transit
corridors.
Provide incentives to encourage developers
to use parking structures to reduce the
amount of land devoted toward parking.

Industrial Districts. Greater buffering from
residential districts is needed including increased
landscaping and wall regulations. The list of
industrial uses should also be updated to include
and possibly encourage eco-industries. Truck
circulation requirements should also be added to
ensure new industrial uses can accommodate the
typical larger trucks that are now being used.
Planned Unit Development. A Planned Unit
Development (PUD) section could be added to
help encourage flexibility in design and uses and
provide incentives to developers. A PUD is a
development option that allows the applicant to
deviate from zoning ordinance requirements in

Provide flexible design to respond to the
unique characteristics of a site.
Coordinate development on larger sites.
Preserve significant natural features in a
more coordinated and comprehensive
manner.
Provide alternatives for developing plans on
land that may exhibit difficuh physical
constraints, and where an improved design
can provide the developer and the
community with benefits.
Ensure public infrastructure and road
improvements are made concurrent with the
development.
Provide the opportunity to mix compatible
land uses.

PUD options should be created for residential
neighborhoods, mixed use projects, and for
business and industrial parks that could be
overlay districts over current zoning. This could
be a key implementation tool for getting the
desired types of development in the subareas
described in the Comprehensive Master Plan. A
redevelopment PUD could also be created that
would give incentives for redevelopment of
nonconforming sites or uses to help promote
infill development.

Business and Office Districts. The business
districts should be revised to encourage the
desired mixed use categories explained in the
Future Land Use Plan. Regulations should:

•

8.

•

Open Space. Regulations should be added that
require residential development over a certain
size to set aside a certain amount of recreational
area or open space as part of any new
subdivision, condominium, or redevelopment.
This can be done based on per unit or acreage
basis and can require active playgrounds and
athletic fields, or simply preserve natural areas
for passive recreational use.

•

7.

•

9.

Natural Features Setback. A natural feature
setback from all regulated wetlands, natural
ponds, lakes and streams and should be required
for all districts that will limit negative impacts
and encroachment into these sensitive areas. A
50 foot setback is recommended where buildings
would be prohibited; however certain structures,
such as decks and piers could extend into the
setback.

10. Landscaping. Southfield has many areas where
non-residential uses abut residential
neighborhoods. The quality and type of
buffering varies from non existent to very
effective screening in different areas. Rather
than a rigid standard, a sliding scale could be
used that varies the width and type of screening
(fence, wall, landscaping, combination, etc.) with
greater buffers for more intense uses.

Stewardship and Implementation 14-16

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

M

12. Driveway Access Management. Access
management standards should be provided to
regulate driveway placement. Driveway spacing
standards should be included based upon
roadway function or posted speeds. Provisions
for shared driveways, frontage roads, service
roads and parking lot connections will be
provided. Charts and graphics will be included
for greater ease of use.

A variety of standards should be established that
touch on a wide variety of topics including:
•
•
•
•
•

Screening for waste receptacles that is
sturdy and matches the building.
Mechanical equipment and screening.
Standards for detention ponds should be
added that encourages a natural appearance.
Use of native materials where appropriate.
Requirements should be reviewed from a
public safety perspective to ensure that
screening dose not hinder police
surveillance.

11. Off-Street Parking Requirements. This
section should be updated based on current
information of parking demand and with the
intention of promoting shared parking
opportunities and transit oriented development.
Specific areas that need to be added or revised
include:
•

•
•

•

Many uses require parking in excess of
typical standards such as retail stores,
restaurants, and professional offices, to
name a few. Excessive parking can lead to
increased storm water runoff and reduces the
walkability of a community. Maximum
parking requirements should be added to
limit excessively large parking lots.
Allowing smaller parking spaces may also
help reduce the amount of pavement on a
site.
Parking space deferment (land banking
provisions) should be included.
The Planning Commission should be able to
approve reduced parking where it is shared
between uses or where a use is served by
walk-in trade or transit.
Provisions should be made to allow
alternative paving materials such as porous
pavement or other alternative paving
material, particularly for seasonal or low
usage parking.

13. Transportation. Many items that shape the
street system and streetscape are included in
other topics in this list; however, the following
topics shall also be considered:
•

•
•

Require Traffic Impact Statements (TIS) for
all development generating more than 500
directional trips.
Increase density and height of buildings that
are located along transit corridors.
Revise regulations so views from I-696 and
M-10 are treated as a front door to the
community and not a rear yard.

14. Lighting. Exterior lighting provisions should be
added to include additional lighting information
for site plan review including: a photometric grid
to verify light intensity is not excessive, pole and
fixture details. Both minimum and maximum
light levels should be regulated to ensure there is
uniformity in lighting and adequate light for
public safety. Light levels at residential property
lines should be limited.
15. Building Materials. Exterior building wall
requirements should be added to help improve
the quality of new development. This section
should address the full range of building
materials and should have standards for front,
side and rear facades. Incentives, such as
increased density, for buildings that are
sustainable or are Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) certified should
be included. LEED is the nationally accepted
benchmark for the design, construction and
operation of high performance green buildings.

Stewardship and Implementation 14-17

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

16. Non-motorized Pathways. Many sections of
the ordinance state that sidewalks shall be
provided along all public streets but do not
provide any specifics on width or construction
standards. A more comprehensive multi-modal
pathway section should be added to the
ordinance that addresses sidewalks and bike
paths and pathway types based on a more
functional classification. A system for installing
pathways incrementally as sites develop also
needs to be addressed, including where there are
right-of-way issues. Sites shall be designed to
have convenient and safe access to and from
parking areas, buildings and the public pathway
system.

17. Nonconforming. The nonconforming
regulations should include separate regulations
for nonconforming uses, lots, sites and buildings.
In addition there should be standards to
encourage upgrades to nonconforming sites that
lack landscaping, parking, lighting etc. and
provides for upgrades commensurate with the
amount of building expansion. The
nonconforming regulations should also be more
lineate on nonconformities that are created by
right-of-way expansion. This would assi5t the
City in acquiring right-of-way without creating a
hardship for the property owner.
18. Sign Ordinance. Although this is a separate
ordinance and is not located within the Zoning
Ordinance, it has significant implications on the
appearance of Southfield. This ordinance should
be updated with modem standards including
reduced height of signage, prohibiting of pole or
ground support signs, and developing
personalized sign regulations for specific
corridors or sub areas to help creative unique
districts and nodes.

Other Ordinances
In addition to the zoning and sign ordinance
discussed above, other city documents, such as the
City's engineering specifications and general code of
ordinances, should be revised based on the
recommendations of this Plan.

Property Maintenance Code
The City has adopted a Property Maintenance Code
via adoption of the State Building Code. This Code
provides the City with enforcement powers to ensure
that properties are maintained to the standards of the
community.

~ outhfield
'

I

Development Review and Approval
Process
Most land development regulations are applied when
new construction is proposed. The City of Southfield
has a comprehensive development review process
from development conceptualization to building
occupancy. Once proper zoning is in place, a site
plan must be approved followed by approval of
building and site engineering construc.·ion plans and
then permits for construction. Buildings and sites are
inspected and then occupancy permits are issued.
Regulations are enforced through a combination of
monitoring by City staff and in response to
complaints.

Form-Based Code
Areas planned for more urban development may be
more appropriate to regulate through form-based
codes rather than traditional zoning ordinances.
Form-based codes focus more on the building form
than the land use and strives to achieve a desired
atmosphere first, then considers use as a secondary
concern. They include very specific building
regulations that ensure proper building placement
relative to the public realm.

Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
A CIP is a multi-year program that lists
recommended improvements, timing, estimated costs
and funding for infrastructure (streets, bikeways,
sidewalks, sanitary sewers, waterlines, storm sewers
and drainage) and community facilities (public
buildings, fire, police and parks). Capital projects
should be identified and constructed in a manner that
helps support and promote desired development and
to meet the needs of residents and businesses already
in the City. The number of projects and their timing
is influenced by several factors, in particular, the
cost, need for environmental clearance, or approval
by other agencies and funds available. For example,
the amount of funding available from outside sources
varies as new programs become available. Funding
is also influenced by the timing of development (i.e.
tax revenue), tax abatements and other changes to the
anticipated tax base.

Incorporating Plan Review into
Rezoning Request Review
Although a review of the plan is recommended every
few years to provide a comprehensive examination of
the plan, many issues with a Comprehensive Master

Stewardship and Implementation 14-18

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Plan will become obvious during consideration of a
rezoning. It is important to incorporate review and
amendment of the Comprehensive Master Plan as
part of the Planning Commission's consideration of
such requests. This is covered in more detail in the
subsection on using the master plan for zoning
reviews.

Using the Comprehensive Master
Plan for Zoning Amendment Review
In considering a rezoning request or a proposed text
amendment, the primary question is: "Does this
zoning amendment conform to our Comprehensive
Master Plan ?" Subsidiary questions follow that:
■
■

■

Was there an error in the plan that affects the
appropriateness of the proposed amendment?
Have there been relevant changes in conditions
since the plan was approved that affect the
appropriateness of the proposed amendment?
Have there been changes in the community' s
attitude that impacts the goals and policies of the
Plan and affect the appropriateness of the
proposed amendment?

Answering these questions should answer the
question whether or not a zoning amendment is
appropriate and that should frame the reason within
the context of the Plan.
This method of analyzing a request rests on the
assumption that a request that complies with a valid
plan should be approved and that one that does not
comply with a valid Plan should not be approved.
(The principal exception to this rule would be text
amendments intended to improve administration of
the ordinance). Further, it assumes that the three
circumstances that would invalidate a Plan are an
oversight in the Plan, a change in condition that
invalidates the assumptions that the Plan was built on
or a change in the goals and priorities that the
community set for itself.

Oversight. An oversight in a Plan can be an
assumption made based on incorrect data, an area on
a Future Land Use map that is incorrectly labeled, or
other factors that if known at the time of the Plan
adoption would have been corrected.

Changes in Conditions. A Plan is based on the
assumption that certain conditions will exist during
the planning period. If those conditions change then
goals, policies and land use decisions that made sense
when the Plan was adopted will no longer be valid
and a zoning amendment that was not appropriate
before may be appropriate now.

Change in Policy. In the end, a Plan is based on the
Planning Commission' s vision of their municipality' s
future. When that vision changes, the plan should
change. When a zoning issue results in a change in
vision, a decision can be made that is contrary to the
current Plan as long as that changed vision is
explicitly incorporated into the Plan.
Three points should be made. First of all , the factors
for consideration (mistake, change in condition, and
change in goals or policy) can work in reverse ;
making a proposal that otherwise seems appropriate,
inappropriate. Secondly, these factors should not be
used to create excuses for justifying a decision to
violate the Comprehensive Master Plan, or to change
it so often that it loses its meaning. Finally, it has
been the City' s long-standing policy that if a
proposed zoning amendment is found inconsistent
with the City's Plan, the amendment cannot be
approved without first amending the plan.

Consistency with Comprehensive Master Plan.
The issue of consistency with the Comprehensive
Master Plan can vary. For the purposes of this plan,
consistency with the Comprehensive Master Plan in
the case of a rezoning means being consistent with
most of the relevant goals and polices as well as
consistent with the Future Land Use Map. In the case
of a proposed text amendment, consistency means
being consistent with most of the relevant goals and
polices.

~outhfield

Stewardship and Implementation 14-19

�City of Southfield Comprehensive Master Plan

Public Opinion
Survey Overview
The following is an overview of the Resident Public
Opinion Survey completed in the fall of 2006. A full
summary of the survey follows in this Appendix.
The City received 1,145 completed surveys, a 3.2
percent response rate. Approximately 58 percent
have lived in Southfield for more than 15 years.
Forty-four percent plan to live in Southfield for the
next 10 years or more. The top reasons why residents
chose to live in Southfield were affordable housing
and because Southfield is a full-service city.
Residents ranked community facilities and services,
such as the library and park facilities, as excellent
and good, respectively. Community relations and the
high school (in their area) ranked fair and poor,
respectively.

■
■

■

•

63 percent strongly agree that the City should
preserve environmental resources.
Approximately three-quarters think the City's
current programs and facilities reflect the interest
of the current residents.
The community's favorite park is Inglenook
Park.
49 percent may support funding of a senior
center.

The Public Opinion Survey also indicated that:
■

■
■
■
■

■

■

■

•

Maintaining property values, stabilizing and
improving neighborhoods are the top priority
issues that need to be addressed by the City.
Approximately 52 percent do not think the level
of local services justifies the taxes paid.
65 percent consider the quality of life good in
Southfield.
7 4 percent think crime is a problem, but not a
major one.
The most attractive feature in the community is
the municipal center complex while the 8 Mile
Road corridor is the most unattractive area in the
community.
65 percent indicate the City has adequate
sidewalks, 62 percent would like to see more
single family homes, while 56 percent would like
improved maintenance of streets, walks and trees
in residential neighborhoods.
52 percent believe Southfield's "main street" is
Southfield Road, followed by Evergreen Road at
25 percent.
37 percent would like to see additional
technology/research development uses in the
City and 36 percent would like more chain/midpriced/family restaurants in the City.
Southfield's image/identity is good according to
58 percent of the survey respondents. The
majority suggest that stronger code
enforcement/crime control, lower taxes, public
school system improvements, community
maintenance and green space improvements
would improve the image/identity of Southfield.

Appendix

�1. Are you a resident of the City of Southfield?

Response Response
Percent
Total
Yes .,_...,..._....iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii......iiiiiiiii~........~liii-.--~
No

98.6%

1100

1.4%

16

Total Respondents

(sk'ppcd n·s quest-ion)

1116

29

2. How many years have you lived in Southfield?

Response Response
Total
Percent
Less than one year

1.3%

14

1-5 years

11.2%

125

6-10 years

16.5%

184

11-15 years

13.2%

147

More than 15 years

57.9%

647

Total Respondents
r

(skipped this question)

1117

28

3. Which of the following best describes your current status within Southfield?

Response Response
Percent
Total
Homeowner

..._iiiiiiiiii....,..iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiaiiiiiaiiii.............iifiiii....,iiiiiii.i

Renter

90.8%

1015

7.6%

85
12

Property Owner (other than
dwelling)

1

1.1%

Business Owner

1

0.1%

None of these

1

0.4%

Total Respondents
(skipped this question)

5
1118

2

4. How many more years do you plan to live in Southfield?

Response Response
Percent
Total
Moving very soon

4.4%

46

1-5 years

29.2%

304

6-10 years

22.4%

233

44%

458

More than 10 years

Total Respondents

1041

( kipped this quemon)

104

1

�5. Where is your primary employment location?
Response Response
Percent
Total
17.8%

198

19.4%

215

i.iiiiii.iiiiiiiaiiiiiiiiiiiii

23.9%

265

...,;iiii,;ilQ.iii.._:.-.,;;;i

36.3%

403

2.7%

30

Tnside Southfield ...._. .iW
Outside Southfield, but
within Oakland County ........ . . . i .
Outside Oakland County
Retired
Not Employed

Total Respondents

( kipped tins quest1011)

1111

J-'

6. How many adults ( 18 years and older) reside in your household?
Total Respondents
(skipped this question)

1084
61

7. HO\v many children (under the age of 18) arc in your household?
Total Respondents

1040

(skippe this questwn)

105

8. What are the three most important reasons you or your family choose to live in the City of
Southfield? Please rank your top three choices (Place a ,, l 11 next to your most important reason, a
"2 11 next to your second reason, and a '13 11 next to your third reason).

1

2

3

Response
Average

Affordable housing

60% (251)

25% (102)

15% (63)

1.55

Schools

44% (122)

40% (111)

16% (44)

1.72

Near relatives and friends

37% (lll)

36% (109)

26% (79)

1.89

Close to shopping

14% (19)

37% (49)

49% (66)

2.35

Good healthcare facilities

10% (10)

49% (49)

42% (42)

2.32

Full-service City

25% (92)

36% (130)

39% (142)

2.14

Housing choices

44% (147)

32%(105)

24% (80)

1.80

24% (43)

39% (70)

37% (67)

2.13

6% (4)

20% (14)

75% (53)

2.69

Low crime

33% (107)

37% (119)

30% (99)

1.98

Near job

37% (93)

41% (103)

22% (56)

1.85

Sense of community

19% (38)

30% (60)

51% (101)

2.32

Other

40% (74)

15% (27)

45% (84)

2.05

Transportation access
Recreational opportunities
nearby

Total Respondents

1106

2

�9. How would you or your family rate the following facilities and services in the community?
Check one box.

Response
No
Opinion Average

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Ambulance service

37%
(418)

23%
(258)

1% ( 13)

0% (1)

38%
(425)

2.78

Fire protection

47%
(519)

30%
(332)

1% ( 15)

0% (0)

22%
(249)

2.22

Police protection

42%
(464)

40%
(443)

8% (87)

2% (25)

8% (94)

1.96

Community relations

18%
(203)

44%
(485)

20%
(225)

7% (73)

11%
(120)

2.48

Code enforcement/property
maintenance

28%
(308)

35%
(390)

18%
(202)

9% (102)

10%
(111)

2.39

Library services

54%
(600)

25%
(278)

5% (51)

l % (15)

15%
( 169)

1.99

Human services

15%
( 166)

29%
(328)

10%
(112)

2% (20)

44%
(487)

3.30

Yard waste services

41%
(452)

37%
(412)

9% (103)

2% (22)

11%
(123)

2.06

Recycling services

39%
(438)

38%
(420)

8% (87)

2% (25)

13%
( 140)

2.11

Stormwater management

14%
(152)

34%
(379)

16%
(172)

6% (61)

31%
(344)

3.06

Wireless
Internet/communication

9% (99)

24%
(262)

14%
(156)

10%
( 107)

43%
(475)

3.54

Park facilities

31%
(339)

49%
(540)

8% (93)

1% (15)

11 %
(123)

2.14

Recreational programs

25%
(279)

45%
(501)

9% (102)

1%(11)

19%
(214)

2.44

Older adult activities

15%
(164)

32%
(353)

9% (96)

3% (29)

42%
(460)

3.24

Elementary schools (in your
area)

12%
(127)

29%
(321)

13%
(142)

6% (71)

40%
(441)

3.34

26%
(290)

15%
(165)

8% (87)

41%
(457)

3.46

10%
(110)

24%
(270)

15%
(169)

11%
(121)

39%
(434)

3.45

4% (40)

10%
(108)

6% (64)

3% (28)

78%
(854)

4.41

Middle schools (in your area) 9% (104)
High schools (in your area)
Charter schools ( in your area)

Total Respondents

(skipped th1~ que tion)

1123
22

3

�~...-,.c-

(.~~uthfield.
~
r 1'
l 1 ,., 11 t e1· o · 1 a

10. Do you think the level of local services received justifies the City of Southfield taxes paid?

Response Response
Percent
Total
29.8%

326

52.5%

574

17.7%

193

Total Respondents

1093

Yes ........iiiiiiiiiliiii.a:

No--iiiiiiai-...._.._.,._---1
Don't know .....iiiiiiii~

(skipped th· yue tion)

5

11 . How would you rate the quality of life in the City of Southfield?

Response Response
Percent
Total
Exce11ent

13.1%

144

Good

65.5%

719

Fair

17.8%

195

Poor

2.2%

24

No opinion

1.4%

15

Total Respondents
(skipped this quest10n)

1097
4~

12. Do you think crime is a problem in the City of Southfield?

Response Response
Percent
Total
Yes, it is a major problem.

Yes, it is a problem, but not
a major one.
Not a problem.

.....aiiiiiiillllii,jjiiiiiiiiiiW:.;,.;.;iiiii,iii....,.iiliiiii,iiii,i;..,..,..j

lllliil--•

9.2%

101

74%

810

16.8%

184

Total Respondents

l 095

(skipped this question)

50

13. How do you rate the overall employment opportunities available in Southfield?

Response Response
Percent
Total
Excellent

2.2%

24

Good

16.4%

180

Fair

22%

242

Poor

7.7%

85

No opinion

51.7%

569

TotaJ Respondents

(skipped thL que.. tion)
-

---

-

-- -

1100

5

4

�14. From the list below, what do you think are the highest priority issues that need to be addressed
by the City? (Indicate what you think are the top three priorities by placing "l next to your
highest priority, "2" next to your second priority, and "3" next to your third priority.
11

1

2

3

Response
Average

43% (117)

28% (77)

29% (81)

1.87

Enhance/redevelop older
commercial/office areas

21 % (53)

33% (82)

46% (113)

2.24

Expand wireless
communication

29% (38)

26% (34)

45% (58)

2.15

Ensure property maintenance
is enforced

39% (187)

34% (163)

28% (134)

1.89

Preserve open space and
greenbelts

34% (97)

34% (96)

33% (93)

1.99

Expand recreational programs

9% (4)

39% (18)

52% (24)

2.43

Improve pedestrian/bicycle
connections between
neighborhoods and shopping,
employment and recreation
area.

24% (27)

30% (34)

46% (52)

2.22

Beautification of roadways

12% (12)

39% (37)

49% (47)

2.36

Increase the non-residential
tax base

40% (121)

31 % (94)

30% (90)

1.90

Maintain property values

43% (304)

38% (271)

19% (135)

1.76

Neighborhood
stabilization/improvement

22% (78)

37% (135)

41 % (149)

2.20

Expand recreational facilities

11 % (7)

37% (23)

52% (33)

2.41

55% (59)

14% (15)

31% (34)

1.77

Improve street maintenance
and reconstruction

Others

Total Respondents
(skipped this question)

1096
49

15. In your opinion, the existing variety of shopping opportunities and services available in the
City are:

Response Response
Percent
Total
Well placed in the
community .....Ollliii.l. . . . ._,.-..,iiijiiiiiiiiii,..;iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiii....

71.1%

743

Too dispersed; not centered
in any one location ...,.......iiiii.iii...

23.3%

243

Overly concentrated in one
area

5.6%

59

Total Respondents

1045

(skipped this que~tion)

100

5

�-~

0uthfield
tlze enter o il a I
16. How would you rate the impact that new development has had on the character of Southfield
over the past IO years?

Response Response
Percent
Total
31%

328

43.2%

458

Not changed

12.7%

134

A little worse

9%

95

4.2%

44

Improved a lot

~iiiiiiiiii..-iiili,i,i~

Improved a little ...........,.......,...,....,_...;;i

A lot worse

Total Respondents
(skipped this question)

1059

86

17. Are there particular streets, neighborhoods, business districts, buildings, parks, or other
features (natural or manmade) in the City that stand out in your mind as being especially
A TTRACTTVE or create a "good feeling" to the community? If so, please describe.

Please see page 11.

Total Respondents

721

(skipped this question)

424

18. Are there particular streets, neighborhoods, business districts, buildings, parks, or other
features (natural or manmadc) in the City that stand out in your mind as being especially
UNATTRACTIVE? If so, please describe.

Please see page 11.

Total Respondents

579

(skipped this que. tion)

566

19. Are there any streets, sidewalks, or intersections in the City that you believe are unsafe or in
need of improvement? If so, which ones and why do you feel they are unsafe?

Please see page 12.

Total Respondents

494

(skipped this question)

651

20. In your opinion, does the City have an adequate sidewalk system?

Response Response
Percent
Total

Yes
No, sidewalks are needed at
this location.

....-.iiiiiiiiiiliiiliiiiiii-.iaiiiii........iiiiiii. .iiiii,.,.l

65.1%

652

lllliiiilliliii,ii,..._._..........

34.9%

349

Total Respondents

1001

(skipped this question)

144

6

�~ .0uthfield
t
21. What types of new housing would you like to see in the City in the future? (Check all that apply.)
Response Response
Percent

Total

Single-Family homes

62.4%

615

Townhouses/Condos

27.1%

267

Apartments

5.5%

54

Older adult housing

31.3%

309

Assisted living

23.1%

228

Other (please specify)

7.8%

77

Total Respondents

986

(skippco this que.stion)

~9

22. Which types of nonresidential development would you like to see in the City in the future?
(Check all that apply.)

Response Response
Total
Percent
eighborhood retail uses

25.7%

250

Specialty stores

32.2%

313

Service related uses

18.1%

176

Supermarkets

24.9%

242

Hotels, motels

7.2%

70

Industrial development

6.2%

60

Office development

11.8%

115

Entertainment

36.4%

354

Technology/research
development

37.7%

367

Department stores &amp; other
large scale commercial uses

25.7%

250

Others (please specify)

12.3%

120

Total Respondents

973

(sl-ipped this question)

172

23. What type of stores or restaurants would you like to see in the community?

Total Respondents

671

(skipped this question)

Please see page 12.

24. Which of the following design features for residential neighborhoods do you support for the
City? (Check all that apply.)

Response Response
Percent
Total
Sidewalks .........iiiiiiiii. . .....,~..i
Decorative street lighting ...........ioiiiiii. .iiiiiiol
eighborhood parks

..._.~iiWiiii.a.iiiiiili~

43.9%

460

40.3%

422

40.4%

423

7

�. Id
B ikepath systems

37.4%

392

Utility improvements

32.5%

341

Ease of getting to other parts
oftown

18.4%

193

Street trees

36.1%

378

Improved maintenance of
street, walks, trees, etc.

56.5%

:592

8%

84

Others (please specify)

Total Respondents

(skipped this questrnn)

1048

97

25. What street/roadway do you consider to be the "Main Street" of Southfield?

Please see page 13.

Total Respondents

982

"-.ipped tt1is que~t1on)

1o3

26. It is important to preserve environmental resources (floodplain, wetlands/woodlands,
lake/river quality) in the City of Southfield.
Response Response
Percent
Total
63.6%

696

27.7%

303

ot sure

6.8%

75

I disagree

1.1%

12

0.8%

9

I strongly agree .....iiiiiiiiiiiliiiiliiiiiliiiiiiiiililiiiii,.,iiiiiiii.i.-.....a
I agree

lallliliiiilliiiiilllii,,,ii,iiiiiiiil

I strongly disagree ,

Total Respondents

(skipped this question)

1095
51

27. How would you rate Southfield's image/identity (roadway landscape, open space,
streams/rivers, directional signs to community facilities)?
Response Response
Percent
Total

Excellent

10.7%

117

58.7%

642

23.9%

261

Poor

4.7%

51

o opinion

2.1%

23

Good......,..,....,......,........................

Fair

..._..,..liiiiia,llil

Total Respondents
( ~kipped t i~ q estion,

1094

:2
8

28. What would you suggest to improve the image/identity of Southfield?

Please see page 13.

Total Respondents

675

�(.~uthfield
.
center of all
..: •

t 1e

1t

29 . How proactive should the City be in creating economic development opportunities?
Response Response
Percent
Total
Ver}' proactive, the City
should aggessively partner
with the private sector in
redeveloping parts of the
City.

Proactive, the City should
involve itself selectively in
redevelopment and keep
public investment to a

llililiiiiiiiiiii. .iiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllii. . .iiiiiiii

50.9%

529

li..iiiiiiiiowiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiii;....a

41.7%

434

7.4%

77

mm1mum.

Passive, economic
development in the City
should be driven by the
market and private land
owners only.

Total Respondents

1040

(~kipped this question)

106

30. How actively should the City engage surrounding communities on topics of mutual concern
(transportation, development along community boundaries)?
Response Response
Percent
Total
Very active

.._illiliillliiiii-.iiiiiiiiiiilllililiiliiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilliiil

Somewhat active ...iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil
Communities should not go
out of their way to cooperate

66.7%

714

31.3%

335

2%

21

Total Respondents

(_skipped this question)

1070
76

31. Do you think the current programs reflect the interest of the current residents?
Response Response
Percent
Total

Yes . ...-..iiiia.........iiiiiiii..-..iiiliiil...,._iiiiiiill

No....__,....,..

74.9%

692

25.1%

232

Total Respondents

924

(skipped this question)

222

9

�32. Do you think the current facilities reflect the needs of the current residents?
Response Response
Total
Percent
Yes

75.9%

710

No

24.1%

226

Total Respondents

936

(skippe this question)

210

33. What is your favorite park?
Please see page 14.

Total Respondents

699

kipped tl11s que~tion)

..i..i6

34. Are you willing to support funding of a Senior Center?
Response Response
Percent
Total

Yes .........._....,.

27.7%

299

No ...._...iiiiiliilii

23.3%

252

49%

530

Maybe ................................

Total Respondents
(skipped this question)

1081

65

35. Please feel free to write any additional comments you may have regarding your impressions of
the City of Southfield as it currently exists and/or how you would like to see the community
develop in the future.
Please see page 15.

Total Respondents

590

(skipped thi~ question)

5.:-5

10

�r o - u alf

17.

18.

Are there particular streets, neighborhoods, business districts, buildings,
parks, or other fe,atures (natural or manmade) in the city that stand out in
your mind as being especially ATTRACTIVE of create a "good feeling" to
the community? If so, please describe.

54%

- Library, Civic Center

15%

- Parks, mainly Inglenook

7%

- Civic Center Drive

5%

- Evergreen Road

4%

- Telegraph and 12 Mile Rd area

Are there particular streets, neighborhoods, business districts, buildings,
parks, or other features (natural or manmade) in the city that stand out in
your mind as being especially UNATTRACTIVE? If so, please describe.

27%

- 8 Mile Road Corridor

13%

- Northland Center area

9%

- Greenfield Road Corridor

8%

- Southfield Road Corridor

11

�19.

23.

Are there any streets, sidewalks, or intersections in the City that you
believe are unsafe or in need of improvement? If so, which onas and why
do you feel they are unsafe?

6%

- Telegraph and 12 Mile Road

6%

- 1O Mile Road

5%

- Southfield Road and 12 Mile Road

4%

- 8 Mile Road

4%

- Southfield Road and 1-696

What type of stores or restaurants would you like to see in the
community?

36%

- Chain/ mid-priced/ family restaurants

19%

- Upscale stores / fine dining / downtown setting

13%

- Other - All types, non-chain, more fast food

8%

- Better mall - clothing, department stores, chain stores

8%

- None, Southfield has enough

12

�25.

28.

What street/ roadway do you consider to be the "Main Street" of
Southfield?

52%

- Southfield Road

25%

- Evergreen Road

16%

- Telegraph Road

7%

- Southfield has no Main Street

3%

- Other

What would you suggest to improve the image/ identity of Southfield?

14%

- Stronger code enforcement I crime control

14%

- Lower taxes

11 %

- Imp rove school system

9%

- Maintain/ keep-up what we have now

7%

- Improve green space

13

�hfield
enf'Jr of i.t at · ·

33.

What is your favorite park?

48%

- Inglenook

27%

- Other - Bauervic Woods, Burgh, Catalpa, Pebble Creek, etc

13%

- Beech woods

10%

- Civic Center

2%

- All parks

14

�(.S~uthfield
~

7

rne ceme · oJ

35.

u all

•

Please feel free to write any additional comments you may have regarding
your impressions of the City of Southfield as it currently exists and/or how
you would like to see the community develop in the future.

Economic
- Lower taxes
Transportation/ Utility Infrastructure
- More sidewalks
- Road repair
Land Use / Development
- Commercial development
- Retail
- Business
Community Facilities and Services
- Code enforcement
- Improve Schools
- Improve waste removal and recycling
Community Image
- Downtown area, City core
- Property maintenance
Parks and Recreation
- Senior center
- Interlinked bike/walking trails
Natural and Cultural Resources
- Preserve green space
- Stay diverse

15

�Real Estate Assessed Value &amp; Space Availability
Because of the importance of Southfield as a business real estate market, an analysis of real estate market trends is
important as the City plans for its future. The first series of tables comes from assessed valuation supplied to use by
SEMCOG.
As a note, the total number of properties in the assessed value tables does not match the total number of properties in
the tables of square footage by year because the information comes from two separate datasets.

Economic Development Appendix-1

�Southfield Commercial Real Estate Assessed Valuation 2006
Commercial Real Estate Assessed Value: 2006
Assessed Value
Property Type

Improved
Vacant
Total

Buildings

Land

$
$
$

520,654,470

$
$
$

18,723 ,010

18,163,550
538,818 ,020

Total

$ 1,094,554,170
652 ,840
$
$ 1,095,207,010

$ 1,615,208,640
18,816 ,390
$
$ 1,634,025 ,030

$
$
$

$
$
$

Industrial Real Estate Assessed Value: 2006

Improved
Vacant
Total

1,321 ,610
20,044,620

50,443,460
17,540
50,461 ,000

69,166,470
1,339 ,150
70,505,620

Southfield Commercial and Industrial Real Estate, Square Footage by Property Type
Commercial &amp; Industrial Real Estate, Square.-F_o_o_ta~g~e_b~y~P_ro~p_e_rt~y_T~p_e_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _---1
Square Feet
Year Built

Total

Percent

21 ,736 ,194
4,252,761
1,522,302
430,601
4,095,971
8,720 ,759
40,758,588

Office
Industrial
Flex
Retail
Shopping Centers
Not Available

53.3%
10.4%
3.7%
1.1%
10.0%
21.4%
100%

Southfield Office Real Estate by Year Built
Commercial &amp; Industrial Real Estate, Square Footage by Year Built:
Office Space
Square Feet
Year Built

Total

2000 &amp; After
1990-99
1980-89
1970-79
Before 1970
Not Available

Percent

900,168
688,460
8,378,881
6,606,056
3,361 ,600
1,801,029

4.1%
3.2%
38.5%
30.4%
15.5%
8.3%

21,736,194

100%

Southfield Industrial Space by Year Built
Commercial &amp; Industrial Real Estate, Square Footage by Year Built:
Industrial Space
Square Feet
Year Built

2000 &amp; After
1990-99
1980-89
1970-79
Before 1970
Not Available

50uthfie1d

Total

Percent

97,856
230,307
755 ,854
373 ,771
2,421 ,528
373 ,445
4,252,761

2.3%
5.4%
17.8%
8.8%
56.9%
8.8%
100%

Economic Development Appendix-2

�Southfield Flex Space by Year Built
Commercial &amp; Industrial Real Estate, Square Footage by Year Built: Flex Space
Square Feet
Year Built

Total

Percent

2000 &amp; After

206,187

13.5%

1990-99

64,260
583,013

4.2%
38.3%

217 ,904

14.3%

166,016

10.9%
18.7%
100%

1980-89
1970-79
Before 1970
Not Available

284,922
1,522,302

Southfield Retail Space by Year Built
Commercial &amp; Industrial Real Estate, Square Footage by Year Built:
Retail Space
Square Feet
Year Built

Total

Percent

2000 &amp; After

16,951

1990-99
1980-89

13,746

1970-79
Before 1970
Not Available

3.9%
3.2%

18,751

4.4%

61 ,119
190,038
129,996
430,601

14.2%
44.1%
30.2%
100%

Southfield Shopping Centers by Year Built
Commercial &amp; Industrial Real Estate, Square Footage by Year Built:
Shopping Centers
Square Feet
Year Built
2000 &amp; After
1990-99
1980-89
1970-79
Before 1970
Not Available

Southfield
r·, , . ,
...

\i;:.::,,-

Total

Percent
95,660
414,539

2.3%
10.1%

118,798
389,389
2,842 ,175

2.9%
9.5%
69.4%

235,410
4,095,971

5.7%
100%

Economic Development Appendix-3

�Southfield Built Space by Type
Commercial and Industrial Real Estate: Total Built Space
25,000,000

20,000,000

-

10,000,000

5,000,000

loouslrial

Otti::e

Flex

Re1ai

Sooppilg Cen!ers

NO! Available

Property Type

Southfield Total Built Space by Year Built
Comme1tial and lndus1rial RealEslale: Tolal OlflC8 Space
(TllousandsofSquare fa!I)

71(XX)

-----

6,IXXJ

5.IXXJ

4,IXXJ

3,IXXJ

2.IXXJ

1,IXXJ

-

Bebl!l970

1!ro9!l

1970-79

21XXJ&amp;Mer

~Availiie

Year Built

{§~uthfield

Economic Development Appendlx-4
4

�Southfield Industrial Space by Year Built
Commercial aoo Industrial Real Esta!!:l otal lrdustrialSpace
(Thousands of Square FM)

3.00J

1.500

1,00J

500

Before 1970

197().79

1990-99

1900-89

2000&amp;Alter

NotAvaflalxe

YearBuil

Southfield Flex Space by Year Built
Convnercial and Industrial Real Estate: Total Flex Space
{Tl!ousaids of Square Feel)

700

600

500

~ 400
0

rn
~

200

Belore 1970

197().79

1980-89

199().99

2000&amp; After

Not Avaiable

YeatBuilt

Economic Development Appendix-5

�■

Southfield Retail Space by Year Built
Commercial and Industrial Real Estate: Total Retail Space
(Thousaids of Square Feet)

200
180

160

140

~ 120
CJ

&lt;n

-;; 11)0

::: BO

60

40

20

Before 1970

1970-79

1990·99

1980-89

2000 &amp;After

NotAvaiable

Year Built

Southfield Shopping Center Space by Year Built
Commercial aoo looustrial Real Estal2:Total Shopping Ceriers
(Thousards fi Square Feet)

3.IXXJ

2.500

2.IXXJ

1.500

1,r.oo

500

Beltle1970

197!Fl9

2aXl&amp;Alter

YsBuil

Economic Development Appendlx-6

�Real Estate Market Trends
The analysis in this section looks at real estate market trends. It draws upon data provided to use by Hines Company.
The first three tables come from Grubb &amp; Ellis. The rest of the data tables are from the Co-Star database.

Office Space. In terms of total office space, the cities of Southfield and Troy each have far more amount of total
built office space as compared to the other communities; however, alI of the communities currently have vacancy
rates of approximately 20%.
While the City of Southfield absorbed over 117,000 square feet of office space in the first three quarters of 2006, the
city's office market is not performing as well as the number suggests.
Throughout the region, businesses are reducing and/or consolidating their use of office space. One example of this
is the downsizing of operations by Collins &amp; Aikman in which they relocated from the City of Troy to occupy
130,000 square feet of space in Southfield. Excluding this one move, the amount of vacant office space in the City
of Southfield increased. The increased vacant space is due primarily to businesses reducing or consolidating their
operations and not due to new construction.

Office Space Availability Comparisons, Southfield versus Neighbors, Source: Grubb and Ellis
Office Real Estate, Space Available:
Third Quarter 2006
Vacant
Community

Total SF

SF

Percent

City of Southfield

16,729,405

3,593,435

21.5%

City
City
City
City

5,865,082
2,809,747
1,571,736
13,147,907

1,133,260
594,306
374,490
2,806,205

19.3%
21.2%
23.8%
21.3%

of Farmington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

Office Space Absorption: Southfield and Neighboring Communities, Source: Grubb and Ellis
Office Real Estate, Absorption &amp; Construction:
Third Quarter 2006

Community

Net Absorption
YTD 2006

Under
Construction

City of Southfield

117,436

-

City
City
City
City

6,169
11,367
69,897
(92,469)

86,500
93,000

of Farmington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

-

Economic Development Appendix-7

- - - - -- = = = = = = = = = = = -

�Office Space Rents: Southfield and Neighboring Communities, Source: Grubb and EJlis
Office Real Estate, Rents: Third Quarter 2006

I

Askinq Rent

I

Community

Class A

Class B

City of Southfield

$

26.69

$

22.82

City
City
City
City

$
$
$
$

23.65
26.57
25.23
27.45

$
$
$
$

22.09
23.00
24.24
21 .78

of Farm ington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
ofTrov

Selected Top Office Leases, Southfield and Neighboring Communities,
Source: Co-Star Database, 2006

SUbmarket

Building (2:a:Renewal)

~

SF

Ten nttlame

t62r865 Col';llS &amp; Aikman

1 Travelers Tower

Southfield fl of 10 Mile

2 The Cor~orate Crossings at Fair

Dearborn

161 ,944 WPP

3 Bloomfield Parkway•

Blocmfield

15&amp;,COO Putte Hames.. Inc

4 Stoneridge I

Blocmfteld

~O CCC Butz:el Leng, P.C.

5 Trey Place

Troy South

6~..61 ~. Sea.rs Holdings.

6 5001cwn CenterDri•;e

Deertorn

6=,,COO •,~'PP

7 One Kennedy Square

CBD

5J597 Ernst &amp; Yeung

8 Galleria Office111tre (400)•

Southfield, I of OMile

5 ,714 Attorney's TrtLe

9 Fairlane Plaza South

Deartorn

44.181 Ferd Motor Land Oe•,elop:merrl

1G Oakland Office C!.'mmons u•

1roy Scuth

11 West Bloomfield Pre fessicnal Center

Blcomfield 1:uest

37,t!:1 Henry Ford Hea.lh System

12 Unit7

Washtenaw W cf 22,

2-6,GCC Audarex

13 Trh4tria Office Blog•

FarmmqtonJFarrn Hifls

32,,~-B l'erriU Lynch &amp; Co., Inc.

1 Victor Park West~

Scu1ttern 1-275 Ccntior

21,2!:.C SHlicfoelectrcn~

2,500 JP Mcrqar Chase

15 Town Center

Southfield I of OI, tle

20,4&amp;6 Se'llperian

16 Knitt111g l,lilr

Rochester

2G 0IJC Sat:,er Buildirlg Ser,'lCes. ilc.

17 Nmtti Building

TJaccrrb East

20-.CUO Plante &amp; l,loran

18 Liberty Center (100'
9 Civic Plaza Bu.ldirlft

Troy South

1Si 'l 2 !Jclina Healthcare

Soottmeld Hof 10 Mile

19.22 T

20 TroyTower

Troy ~larth

1f:I 117 h.ernrek

21 Stroh River Place'

CetrcitE cfit'l•'ood\•.tl.fd

1&amp;.933 .bl:&lt;lit Niclialscn P.C

22 Century Building

FarmingtcnJFann HUis

1i, T7 CSl,I Wcrldwkle. Inc.

23 Bingham Office Center

Southfield 0110 Uile

16,273 Dana Corporation

24 Fairways Office Cen1er
25. o •1er 600*

Fa.rmingtonJFarrn Hills

"15.1&amp;4 lNireless lcyz

CBO

15.99E, Canadlllfl Consulate General

26 Great Expressions Center•

Blocmfield

1~.,923 S1rabl Cunning-ham &amp; Sha~. P.C.

27 Bingham Office Center

Southfield I of OMlle

15.599 U itecl Pttysicians

28 Victor Par!. West•

Southern l-27S Ccrrirlcr

1: ,55·2 t 1artz Tra, el Company

29 Courtyard Bldg

lNa.shtenaw Wrf2.,

14.7CC llcRy !Jaid. Ille.

30 Oakland Towne S(ttlare Phase !t

Southfield H of OMile

1-4.139 ttatiooal Union Fire

or.rne

z

·me-r's Association

31 Advance Office Bldg

Southfield so1

:!2 Crossmark Bldg

Scuthem 1-27~, Ccrridor

13.7CC Honey-..,eft lnterraiic;nal Inc.
1:.,52,B Et)Li&gt;J lanagernert Inc.

1 ,~06 Zamler, l!elle &amp; Shiffman, P.C.

~,3 Columbia Center Ir

Trc:t South

3 LSG Building

Pcntiac

12-CCO LSG Insurance

35 Tri-Atria Office Bldg

Farm111gtonJ'Farrn Hills

12 72 Elrros t•.S. Ifie.

35 Bloomfield Centre Scutr•

Blcr.mfield

12..231 Lnorm. Sayles &amp; Ccmpany LP.

37 Westridge Office Center

Farmington/Farm Hills

12. me Amerigcn. Inc.

38 Ford Field

CBO

11 .fOC FEI

39 3850 Hamlin Rd

Auburr Hffls

11 .537 Bnrgl/uamer

40 Galleria Officeritre (200)

Southfield ti of 10 Mile

11,411 Internet Operations Center, Inc.

uthfield_
I,

I

J

Economic Development Appendix-a

�Total Office Space

Total Office Market, Southfield and Other Sub-Markets
Office Real Estate, Total Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Vacancy
Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

# of
Bigs
418
283
135
538
167
55
52
264
490
151
308
178
130
734
412
37
136
134
105
306
295
81
214
413
723
483

Total SF
(RBA)

23,885,541
17,940,762
5,944,779
16,352,691
3,955,509
2,366,891
1,246,798
8,783,493
35,769 ,260
2,016,436
5,595,717
4,268,045
1,327,672
9,873,859
14,336,912
7,703,958
1,318,926
3,685,410
1,628,618
3,440,869
17,845,171
5,164,606
12,680,565
10,311 ,095
18,369,456
9,182,527

Total SF

4,172,366
3,423,657
748,709
2,578,859
476,800
299,435
150,568
1,652,056
6,765 ,079
321 ,571
1,144,176
900,727
243,449
1,329,159
1,832,699
491 ,382
174,844
847,185
319,288
500 ,299
4,075,285
752,775
3,322,510
1,663,480
2,210,889
1,229,126

Percent

17.5%
19.1%
12.6%
15.8%
12.1%
12.7%
12.1%
18.8%
18.9%
15.9%
20.4%
21 .1%
18.3%
13.5%
12.8%
6.4%
13.3%
23.0%
19.6%
14.5%
22.8%
14.6%
26.2%
16.1%
12.0%
13.4%

Economic Development Appendix-9

�Office Market Dynamics, Southfield and Other Sub-Markets
Office Real Estate, Total Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Year-to-Date
Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

Southfield

c-"

ti

Net
Absorption
48,614
77,779
(29 ,165)
(47,086)
(47,249)
(12,409)
16,362
(3 ,790)
86,583
41 ,153
184,300
135,090
49,210
1,247
(69 ,381 )
(213 ,553)
24,985
113,926
5,261
127,885
70 ,743
(125,095)
195,838
219,534
(125 ,424)
44,429

Deliveries
-

Under
Construction
15,200
15,200

-

53 ,651
-

-

-

112,680
11 £,680

-

37,651
16,000
355 ,000
20,000
411 ,728
408 ,473
3,255
18,073
-

-

176,103
176,103
26,163
-

-

45,440
-

28,424

-

-

354,501
139,276
38,676

215,360
52,680
52,680

Economic Development Appendlx-10

�Quoted Rates Data for Office Space, Southfield and Other Sub-Markets
Office Real Estate, Total Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Quoted
Rates

Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

20.02
20.99
15.59
23.32
27.53
25.81
22.14
21.69
19.19
18.89
22.58
23.24
20.45
19.43
19.26
21 .24
20.46
16.41
22.32
18.17
20.44
20.89
20.23
23.21
20.41
19.88

Economic Development Appendlx-11

�Class A Office Space
Class A Office Market Overview
Office Real Estate, Class A Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Vacancy
Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

# of
Bigs
27
26
1
30
6
7
2
15

Total SF
(RBA)
7,233,932
7,163,932
70,000
3,194,547
359 ,218
881 ,250
89 ,848
1,864,231

29
1
15
14
1
6
10
7
-

11,492,969
43,230
1,533,069
1,531 ,017
2,052
375,902
5,960,223
5,768,384

1
2
1
32
11
21
25
23
11

86,344
105,495
40,000
6,302,465
2,070,257
4,232,208
3,408,118
5,366,256
1,634,413

Total SF
1,611,515
1,610,015
1,500
824,243
44,273
183,139
8,317
588 ,514
1,647,145
396,058
394,006
2,052
104,377
376,814
280,436
31 ,265
65,113
1,099,293
265,900
833,393
507,360
722,177
289,394

Percent
22.3%
22.5%
2.1%
25.8%
12.3%
20.8%
9.3%
31 .6%
14.3%
0.0%
25.8%
25.7%
100.0%
27.8%
6.3%
4.9%
0.0%
36 .2%
61 .7%
0.0%
17.4%
12.8%
19.7%
14.9%
13.5%
17.7%

Economic Development Appendix-12

�Class A Office Market Absorption and Delivery Data
Office Real Estate, Class A Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Year-to-Date
Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

Net
Absorption

Deliveries

Under
Construction

(4,465)
(8,957)
(960)
755
4,697
119,766
-

355,000
-

35,798

242,000

-

37,850
(2,052)
17,951
(208,791)
(213,032)

242,000
-

-

23,021
23,021
-

-

-

112,680
112,680
-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4,241

108,855
12,783
96,072
193,407
(85,336)
(14,954)

-

-

-

308,900
7,000
-

160,360
34,315
34,315

Economic Development Appendix-13

�Quoted Rates, Class A Office Market
Office Real Estate, Class A Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Quoted
Rates

Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

Southfield

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

23.11
23.12
17.00
25.80
35.45
27.31
19.04
23.44
23.42

23.06
23.06
25.03
21 .06
20.46

28.02
22.25
22.99
24.06
22.67
27.09
23.12
22.75

Economic Development Appendix-14

�Class B Office Space
Class B Office Market Overview
Office Real Estate, Class B Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Vacancy
Market
Southfield

Southfield N of 1O Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

~ outhfielcl

#of
Bigs

175
125
50
321
101
41
28
151
222
71
185
102
83
344
202
25
63
64
50
124
171
49
122
236
328
230

Total SF
(RBA)

12,198,606
8,966,926
3,231 ,680
11,178,690
2,917,515
1,379 ,601
847,997
6,033,577
19,582,183
1,384,673
3,080,809
2,121,806
959,003
6,079 ,202
5,673,136
1,879 ,875
807,170
1,963,714
1,022,377
1,991 ,589
10,283,659
2,830,739
7,452,920
5,305,029
9,002 ,681
4,672,750

Total SF

2,079,044
1,591,651
487,393
1,561 ,078
385,528
87,716
120,462
967,372
4,085,959
256,223
596 ,796
403 ,773
193,023
835,986
918,747
210,946
94,387
396,984
216,430
368,868
2,863,746
470,664
2,393,082
966,413
1,109,355
684,312

Percent

17.0%
17.8%
15.1%
14.0%
13.2%
6.4%
14.2%
16.0%
20.9%
18.5%
19.4%
19.0%
20.1%
13.8%
16.2%
11 .2%
11 .7%
20.2%
21 .2%
18.5%
27.8%
16.6%
32.1%
18.2%
12.3%
14.6%

Economic Development Appendix-15

�Class B Office Market Absorptions and Deliveries
Office Real Estate, Class B Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Year-to-Date
Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

Net
Absorption

Deliveries

93,112

-

(5,505)

-

87,607

(8 ,110)
(39 ,103)

Under
Construction
15,200
15,200
-

53,651

-

-

-

1,453
16,833

37,651

12,707

16,000
-

-

(33 ,797)
34,533

20,000

-

165,411

166,473

176,103

107,118

166,473

176,103

58 ,293
27,399
108,656

18,073

-

-

-

84,611
4,675
72,796
(62 ,034)

26,163
-

-

(521)
19,891

-

-

-

45,440

28,424
-

(131 ,518)

-

-

69,484

-

-

(13 ,740)

45,601

(103 ,149)

132,276

55,000
18,365

3,904

38,676

18,365

Economic Development Appendix-16

�Class B Office Market Quoted Rates
Office Real Estate, Class B Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Quoted
Rates

Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

Southfield-

~

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

18.90
19.66
16.08
22.17
25.f)1
23.37
22.63
20.92
17.68
19.68
22.96
24.00
20.91
19.72
20.74
22.99
20.98
18.50
22.90
18.90
19.20
19.86
18.83
21.12
19.46
19.40

Economic Development Appendix-17

�Class C Office Space
Class C Office Market Overview
Office Real Estate, Class C Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Vacancy
Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield

Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

,.Southfield

...........

# of
Bigs
216
132
84
187
60
7
22
98
239
79
108
62
46
384
200
5
73
69
53
181
92
21
71
152
372
242

Total SF
(RBA)

4,453 ,003
1,809,904
2,643,099
1,979,454
678,776
106,040
308,953
885,685
4,694,108
588,533
981 ,839
615,222
366,617
3,418,755
2,703,553
55,699
511,756
1,635,352
500,746
1,409,280
1,259,047
263,610
995,437
1,597,948
4,000,519
2,875,364

Total SF

481 ,807
221 ,991
259,816
193,538
46,999
28,580
21,789
96,170
1,031 ,975
65,348
151 ,322
102,948
48,374
388,796
537,138
80,457
418,936
37,745
131 ,431
112,246
16,211
96 ,035
189,707
379 ,357
255,420

Percent

10.8%
12.3%
9.8%
9.8%
6.9%
27.0%
7.1 %
10.9%
22.0%
11 .1%
15.4%
16.7%
13.2%
11.4%
19.9%
0.0%
15.7%
25.6%
7.5%
9.3%
8.9%
6.1%
9.6%
11 .9%
9.5%
8.9%

Economic Development Appendix-18

�Class C Office Market Absorptions and Deliveries
Office Real Estate, Class C Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006
Year-to-Date
Market
Southfield
Southfi eld N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birm ingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes
Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb
North Oakland
Aubu rn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South
Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

Net
Absorption
(62,014)
(38,354)
(23 ,660)
(34,511 )
811
(12,902)
(1,226)
(21 ,194)
614
6,620
(16,909)
(9,878)
(7,031)
(44,103)
30,754
5,094
29 ,315
(3,655)
55,089
23,922
(6,360)
30,282
39,867
63,061
55 ,479

Deliveries
-

-

3,255

Under
Construction
-

-

3,255
-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Economic Development Appendix-19

�Class C Office Market Quoted Rates
Office Real Estate, Class C Market Statistics: Third Quarter 2006

Quoted
Rates

Market
Southfield
Southfield N of 10 Mile
Southfield S of 10 Mile
Bloomfield
Birmingham Area
Bloomfield
Bloomfield West
Farmington/Farm Hills
Detroit/The Pointes

Downriver
Livingston/W Oakland
Central 1-96 Corridor
Howell/Brighton Area
Macomb

North Oakland
Auburn Hills
Lakes Area
Pontiac
Rochester
Royal Oak
Troy
Troy North
Troy South

Washtenaw
West Wayne
Southern 1-275 Corridor

$ outhfield

15.72

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

20.47
18.28

$

17.66

16.85
14.84
21 .65
26.46
30.18
20.98
17.72
17.19
13.88
18.93
19.71
16.51
17.22
15.16

19.73
13.75
20.45
16.39
18.02
19.33
17.73

Economic Development Appendix-20

�-:-~

Comparative Industry Sector Data
The data in this appendix show comparisons of Southfield and its competitor communities in SE Michigan. The initial eries of tables are
industry data. Note: The US Economic Census does not provide detailed city level data for some industries. Tho e for which data are available
are included here. The final table in this appendix compares workforce data Southfield and surrounding communities.

Manufacturing
Manufacturing Employment: 1997-2002
Change 1997-2002

Number of Employees
Community
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City
City
City
City
City

of
of
of
of
of

Southfield
Farmington Hills
Livonia
Novi
Troy

1997

Number

2002

4,564
90 ,481
380 ,989
4,564
5,109
17,012
2,448
11 ,872

3,717
79 ,167
339 ,391

Percent
-18.6%

(847)
(11 ,314)

-12.5%
-10.9%

(41 ,598)
(847)

3,717
3,551
13,295
3,151
9,211

-18.6%
-30 .5%
-21 .8%
28.7%
-22.4%

(1 ,558)
(3,717)
703
(2,661)

Manufacturing Establishments: 1997-2002
Change 1997-2002

Number of Establishments
Community

1997

City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City
City
City
City
City

of Southfield
of Farmington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

Number

2002

Percent

115
2,366
7,980

103
2,160
7,276

(12)
(206)
(704)

-10.4%
-8.7%
-8.8%

115
155
350
87
396

103
123
296
90
320

(12)
(32)
(54)
3
(76)

-10.4%
-20.6%
-15.4%
3.4%
-19.2%

Manufacturing Annual Payroll: 1997-2002
Annual Payroll ($1,000)
Community
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City
City
City
City
City

of Southfield
of Farmington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

1997

2002

211 ,748
3,747,478
17,210,390

190,806
3,745,799
16,740,016

(20 ,942)
(1,679)
(470 ,374)

211 ,748
225,308
826,716
104,351
470,949

190,806
156,585
692,175
129,509
374,546

(20 ,942)
(68 ,723)
(134,541 )

Manufacturing Value of Shipments: 1997-2002
Shipments /Sales /Receipts ($1,000)
Community
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City
City
City
City
City

of Southfield
of Farmington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

~$out.~ field_

Change 1997-2002
Number

1997
748,752
27 ,172,655
120,896 ,363
748,752
993,840
4,243,020
378,780
1,677,987

2002
878,302
27,022,148

Percent
-9 .9%
0.0%
-2.7%
-9.9%
-30 .5%
-16.3%
24.1%
-20.5%

25,158
(96,403)

Change 1997-2002
Number

Percent

120,863,680

129,550
(150,507)
(32 ,683)

17.3%
-0.6%
0.0%

878,302
596,628
3,529 ,730
547,140
1,620,269

129,550
(397,212)
(713,290)
168,360
(57,718)

17.3%
-40 .0%
-16.8%
44.4%
-3.4%

Economic Development Appendix-21

�,~

Wholesale Trade
Wholesale Trade Employment: 1997-2002
Change 1997-2002

Number of Employees
1997

Community

6,838

4,381

(2,457)

42,709

(2,602)

-35.9%
-5.7%

107,361

98 ,924

(8,437)

-7.9%

6,838
5,457

4,381

(2,457)

-35.9%

6,172

715

13.1%

6,093
2,995

(2,598)
(945)

-29 .9%

7,457

(32)

Oakland County

City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills

8,691

City of Livonia
City of Novi

3,940
7,489

City of Troy

Wholesale Trade Establishments: 1997-2002
Number of Establishments

Oakland County

440
3,526

Southeast Michigan

7,831

City of Southfield

440

City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills
City of Livonia

416
424
163
521

City of Novi
City of Troy

-24.0%
-0.4%

Change 1997-2002

2002

1997

Community

Percent

45,311

City of Southfield
Southeast Michigan

Number

2002

Number

Percent

313
3,136
7,155

(127)

313
350

(127)
(66)

367
176

(57)

-28.9%
-15.9%
-13.4%

13
(55)

-10.6%

466

-28 .9%
-11 .1%

(390)
(676)

-8.6%

8.0%

Wholesale Trade Annual Payroll: 1997-2002
Annual Payroll ($1,000)
Community
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills
City of Livonia
City of Novi
City of Troy

1997
425,961
2,332,052
4,820,510

Change 1997-2002

2002

Number

Percent

298,440

(127,521)

-29.9%

2,451 ,125
5,068 ,087

119,073
247,577

5.1%
5 .1%

425,961

298,440

(127,521 )

-29 .9%

266,743
337,723
185,114

313,389
311 ,304
165,690

46,646
(26,419)

17.5%
-7.8%

(19,424)

-10.5%

384,086

423,751

39,665

10.3%

Wholesale Trade Value of Shipments: 1997-2002
Shipments /Sales /Receipts ($1,000)
Community
1997
2002

Change 1997-2002
Number

Percent

City of Southfield

15,374,784

10,822 ,045

(4,552 ,739}

Oakland County

69,193,980

62,105,475

(7,088 ,505)

-29 .6%
-10.2%

119,496,360

119,344,812

(151 ,548)

-0 .1%

Southeast Michigan
City of Southfield

15,374,784

10,822 ,045

(4,552,739)

-29 .6%

City of Farmington Hills

7,318,421

5,129,960

(2,188,461)

-29 .9%

City of Livonia
City of Novi
City of Troy

6,430,171

10,625,578

4,195,407

65.2%

2,851 ,870
11 ,690,883

3,999,399
13,634,351

1,147,529
1,943,468

40 .2%

~o~thfi_e lcl

16.6%

Economic Development Appendix-22

�Retail Trade
Retail Trade Employment: 1997-2002
Change 1997-2002

Number of Employees
Community

1997

Southeast Michigan

Percent
-16.5%

8,925

7,449

(1,476)

83 ,826
254,616

80,791

(3 ,035)

-3 .6%

248 ,940

(5 ,676)

-2.2%

City of Southfield
Oakland County

Number

2002

City of Southfield

8,925

7,449

(1,476)

-16.5%

City of Farmington Hills

4,696

4,785

City of Livonia
City of Novi
City of Troy

9,668
6,100

9,373
6,672
13,040

89
(295)

-3.1%

12,184

1.9%

572

9.4%
7.0%

856

Retail Trade Establishments: 1997-2002
Number of Establishments
Community

1997

City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills

Number

Percent

566
5,530
17,878

510
5,368
17,690

(56)
(162)

-9.9%
-2 .9%

(188)

-1.1%

566

510
284

(56)
(44)

566

(78)

-9.9%
-13.4%
-12.1%

338
596

15
(11)

-1.8%

328
644

City of Livonia
City of Novi
City of Troy

Change 1997-2002

2002

323
607

4.6%

Retail Trade Annual Payroll: 1997-2002
Annual Payroll ($1,000)
Community
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City
City
City
City
City

1997
182,610

Change 1997-2002

2002

Percent

1,623,945
4,634,742

184,651
1,850,840
5,366,043

182,610

184,651

2,041

1.1%

104,190
167,704

32,704

31.4%
14.0%

105,404

136,894
191 ,229
129,541

226,858

298,819

71 ,961

of Southfield
of Farmington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

Retail Trade Value of Shipments: 1997-2002
Shipments /Sales /Receipts ($1,000)
Community

Number

1997

2002

2,041

1.1%

226,895
731 ,301

14.0%
15.8%

23,525
24,137

22 .9%
31 .7%

Change 1997-2002
Number

Percent

City of Southfield

1,987,669

2,413 ,836

426,167

21.4%

Oakland County

16,585 ,042

19,140,544

2,555,502

15.4%

Southeast Michigan

48,478 ,305

56 ,386,450

7,908,145

16.3%

City of Southfield

1,987,669

2,413,836

426,167

21.4%

City of Farmington Hills

1,100,432

1,239 ,439

139,007

12.6%

City of Livonia
City of Novi
City of Troy

1,591 ,215
1,177,759

2,014,903
1,265 ,004

423,688
87,245

26.6%
7.4%

2,410 ,805

3,110,710

699,905

29.0%

Economic Development Appendix-23

-- -

--

-

-

�Real Estate, Rental &amp; Leasing
Real Estate &amp; Rental &amp; Leasing Employment: 1997-2002
Number of Employees
Community

1997

Change 1997-2002
Percent

Number

2002

3,001
14,568

2,781

(220)

-7.3%

Oakland County

16,161

1,593

10.9%

Southeast Michigan

29 ,948

33 ,179

3,231

10.8%

City of Southfield

City of Southfield

3,001

2,781

(220)

-7.3%

City of Farm ington Hills

3,754

4,157

403

10.7%

City of Livonia
City of Novi

799
254
1,527

991
489

192
235

24.0%
92.5%

2,064

537

35.2%

City of Troy

Real Estate, Rental, &amp; Leasing Establishments: 1997-2002
Number of Establishments
Community

1997

Change 1997-2002
Number

2002

Percent

(15)

-5.1%
4.3%

City of Southfield
Oakland County

292
1,772

277
1,848

Southeast Michigan

4,261

4,475

City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills

292
206

277
201

(15)
(5)

-5.1%
-2.4%

City of Livonia
City of Novi
City of Troy

120

129

53
169

68
160

9
15
(9)

28.3%

Real Estate, Rental &amp; Leasing Annual Payroll: 1997-2002
Annual Payroll ($1,000)
Community

1997

City of Southfield

City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills
City of Livonia
City of Novi
City of Troy

City of Southfield

7.5%
-5.3%

Number

96,000
571 ,859

Percent

6,834

7.7%

1,032,042

180,944
283,893

46 .3%
37 .9%

89 ,166
89 ,094

96,000
141 ,693

6,834

7.7%

52,599

59 .0%

21 ,522
6,337

25,735
15,928

151 .3%

41 ,231

85,989

4,213
9,591
44,758

390,915
748,149

Real Estate, Rental &amp; Leasing Value of Shipments: 1997-2002
Shipments /Sales /Receipts ($1,000)
Community

5.0%

Change 1997-2002

2002
89 ,166

Oakland County
Southeast Michigan

76
214

1997

2002

19.6%
108.6%

Change 1997-2002
Number

Percent

356,320

479,859

1,987,131

2,834,638

123,539
847 ,507

34 .7%

Oakland County
Southeast Michigan

4,245 ,972

5,652,406

1,406,434

33 .1%

42.6%

City of Southfield

356,320

34.7%

429,479

479 ,859
560,558

123,539

City of Farmington Hills

131 ,079

City of Livonia

149,083

131 ,989

(17,094)

30.5%
-11 .5%

City of Novi
City of Troy

34,742
191 ,288

72,356
483,644

37,614
292,356

108.3%
152.8%

Economic Development Appendix-24

�Professional, Scientific, &amp; Technical Services
Professional, Scientific &amp; Technical Services Employment: 1997-2002
Number of Employees
Community
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City
City
City
City
City

of Southfield
of Farmington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

1997

Change 1997-2002
Number

2002

NA

NA

NA

93,633

32,634

53.5%

NA

NA

NA

13,035
7,600
6,668
1,436

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

15,151

16,865

1,714

11.3%

Professional, Scientific, &amp; Technical Services Establishments: 1997-2002
Number of Establishments
Community
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City
City
City
City
City

1997

Change 1997-2002

2002

Number

967
6,415
13,011

29
893
2,095

3.1%
16.2%
19.2%

938
656
384
126
843

967
750
441
220
924

29
94
57
94
81

3.1%
14.3%
14.8%
74.6%
9.6%

Professional, Scientific &amp; Technical Services Annual Payroll: 1997-2002
Annual Payroll ($1,000)
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
City
City
City
City
City

of Southfield
of Farm ington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

1997
696,774
2,990,558
5,202,486
696,774
359,643
223,985
66,610
822,101

Change 1997-2002

2002

Number

NA
5,640,335

NA

City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills
City of Livonia
City of Novi
City of Troy

~outhfielcl

1,584,788
6,921 ,973
12,275 ,598
1,584 ,788
829 ,141
553,650
166,930
1,644 ,736

Percent

NA

2,649 ,777

88 .6%

NA

NA

NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

1,029,197

207,096

Professional, Scientific &amp; Technical Services Value of Shipments: 1997-2002
Shipments /Sales /Receipts
($1,000)
Community
1997
2002
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michiqan

Percent

938
5,522
10,916

of Southfield
of Farmington Hills
of Livonia
of Novi
of Troy

Community

Percent

13,035
60,999
113,457

NA
9,865 ,115

25.2%

Change 1997-2002
Number
Percent

NA

NA

2,943,142

42 .5%

NA

NA

NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

2,175,553

530,817

32.3%

Economic Development Appendlx-25

�Administrative, Support, Waste Management, &amp; Remediation Services
Administration &amp; Support &amp;Waste Management &amp; Remediation Services Employment: 1997-2002
Number of Employees
Change 1997-2002
Community

1997

Number

Percent

15,152
88,516

23,053

7,901

52.1%

81,549

(6 ,967)

-7.9%

169,739

168,995

(744)

-0.4%

15,152

23,053

7,901

52.1%

5,410

4,259

(1 ,151)

-21.3%

10,590

8,717
1,207

(1 ,873)
(1 ,626)

-17.7%

17,635

(4,918)

-21.8%

City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan

2002

City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills
City of Livonia
City of Novi

2,833
22,553

City of Troy

-57.4%

Administration, Support, Waste Management, &amp; Remediation Services Establishments: 1997-2002
Number of Establishments
Change 1997-2002
Community

1997

Number

363
2,143
5,049

6,267

City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills
City of Livonia

363
151

342
158

214

266

City of Novi
City ofTroy

67
392

375

City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan

--=

2002
342
2,435

86

Percent

(21)
292

-5.8%
13.6%
24.1%

1,218
(21)

-5.8%

7
52

4.6%
24 .3%
28.4%
-4.3%

19
(17)

Administration, Support, Waste Management &amp; Remediation Services Annual Payroll: 1997-2002
Annual Payroll ($1,000)
Change 1997-2002
Community
City of Southfield

1997

2002

Number

Percent

293,034

709,405

416,371

142.1%

1,953,680
3,650,102

2,396,849
4,722,366

443,169
1,072,264

22.7%
29.4%

City of Southfield

293,034

142.1%

103,294

709,405
148,750

416,371

City of Farmington Hills
City of Livonia

45,456

44.0%

232,500

196,314

(36,186)

-15.6%

City of Novi
City of Troy

88,768
517,955

36,517
605,705

(52,251)
87,750

-58.9%
16.9%

Oakland County
Southeast Michigan

Administration, Support, Waste Management &amp; Remediation Services Value of Shipments: 1997-2002
Shipments /Sales /Receipts ($1,000)
Change 1997-2002
Community
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan

1997
574,794
3,281 ,945
6,916,290

City of Southfield
City of Farmington Hills
City of Livonia

425,040

City of Novi
City of Troy

879,186

574,794
164,444
125,619

2002
1,119,363
4,079 ,213
8,994,520

Number
544,569
797,268
2,078,230

Percent
94.7%
24.3%
30 .0%

1,119,363
252,549
371 ,172

544,569
88,105
(53 ,868)

53.6%
-12.7%

70,306
906,121

(55,313)

-44.0%

26,935

3.1%

94.7%

Economic Development Appendix-26

�Educational Services
Educational Services Employment: 1997-2002
Number of Employees
Community

1997

Change 1997-2002

2002

Number

Percent

595

449

(146)

-24.5%

2,464

3,445

981

39 .8%

Southeast Michigan

NA

NA

NA

NA

City of Southfield

595

449

(146)

-24.5%

City of Farmington Hills

193

255

62

32.1%

City of Livonia

252

NA

NA

City of Novi

16

19

NA
118.8%

City of Troy

415

35
441

26

6.3%

City of Southfield
Oakland County

Educational Services Establishments: 1997-2002
Number of Establishments
Community

1997

Change 1997-2002

2002

Number

37

31

(6)

Oakland County

271

270

(1)

Southeast Michigan

611

737

City of Southfield

37

31

(6)

City of Farmington Hills

20

19

(1)

City of Livonia

20

30

City of Southfield

City of Novi

5

9

City ofTroy

35

31

1997

-16.2%
-0.4%

126

20 .6%
-16.2%
-5 .0%

10

Educational Services Annual Payroll: 1997-2002
Annual Payroll ($1,000)
Community

Percent

50.0%

4

80.0%

(4)

-11.4%

Change 1997-2002

2002

Number

City of Southfield

20,681

15,473

(5,208)

Oakland County

60,735

96,365

35,630

NA

NA

Southeast Michigan
City of Southfield

Percent
-25 .2%
58 .7%

NA

20,681

15,473

(5 ,208)

City of Farmington Hills

7,971

6,449

(1 ,522)

City of Livonia

8,381

NA

NA
-25.2%
-19.1 %

NA

NA

City of Novi

214

479

265

123.8%

City of Troy

8,672

17,737

9,065

104.5%

Educational Services Value of Shipments: 1997-2002
Shipments /Sales /Receipts ($1,000)
Community
1997
2002
City of Southfield
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan

Change 1997-2002
Number
Percent

56,714

31,209

(25 ,505)

179,806

232,048

52,242

D

D

NA

-45.0%
29 .1%

NA

City of Southfield

56,714

31 ,209

(25 ,505)

City of Farmington Hills

23,240

18,821

(4,419)

City of Livonia

13,129

D

NA

-45 .0%
-19.0%

NA

City of Novi

1,247

1,496

249

20.0%

City of Troy

28 ,075

40,116

12,041

42.9%

Economic Development Appendix-27

�Force Statistics:

996-2005
City of Southfield

2003

2004

42 ,844

42,451

42,031

41 ,994

39 ,956
2,888

39 ,428

38 ,997
3,034

38,941
3,053

7.2

7.3

2002

1996

1997

1998

1999

Labor Force

43 ,405

46,514

47,251

47,825

48 ,660

43 ,971

43,487

Employment
Unemployment

40,495
2,910

44,624
1,890

45,603
1,648

46,275
1,550

47,116
1,544

42,332
1,639

41 ,042
2,445

3.5

3.2

3.2

3.7

5.6

6.7

Jobless Rate

4.1

6.7

2000

2001

1990

3 ,023
7.1

2005

Oakland County

2004

2005

653,777

647,178
611 ,313

640,637
604,636

639 ,985

619 ,506

29 ,007

34,271

4.4

5.2

35 ,865
5.5

36 ,001
5.6

36 ,223
5.7

1998

1999

649 ,901

660,552

668 ,728

680 ,455

675,784

665 ,348

625,839

639 ,564

648,990

660,795

656,338

636 ,341

37,057
6.1

24,062

20 ,988
3.2

19,738

19,660
2.9

19,446

1990

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2,304,693
2,124,125

2,412 ,546
2,297,857

180,568
7.8

114,689
4.8

1990
4,620,000

1996

Labor Force

604,989

Employment

567,932

Unemployment
Jobless Rate

3.7

3.0

2000

2003

1997

1990

2.9

2001

2002

603,762

Southeast Michigan
Labor Force
Employment
Unemployment
Jobless Rate

2,438,777

2,462 ,186

2,500,991

2,501 ,294

2,438 ,610

2,424,547

2,420 ,189

2,366 ,888

2,407,543

2,411 ,983

2,492,214
2,364,662

2,448,457

2,336 ,599
102,178
4.2

2,299 ,153

2,257,187

2,251 ,959

95 ,298
3.9

93 ,448
3.7

89 ,311
3.6

127,552
5.1

149,304
6.1

2,270,843
167,767

167,360
6.9

168,230
7.0

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

4,888 ,000
4,647,000
241 ,000
4.9

4,963 ,000
4,749,000
214000
4.3

5,008 ,000
4,810,000
198000
4.0

5,089,000

5,144,000
4,953 ,000

5,144,000
4,876 ,000

190,000
3.7

268,000
5.2

5,049 ,000
4,734,000
315 ,000

5,055 ,000

4,897,000
192000
3.8

5 ,073 ,000
4,717 ,000
356 ,000

5,097,000
4,754,000
344 ,000

7.0

6.7

1998

1999

2000

2001

6.9

State of Michigan

L.

orce

1ment
..... ...,mployment

Jobless Rate

4,262 ,000
358,000
7.7

6.2

4,696 ,000
359 ,000
7.1

Labor Force Statistics, Comparison Cities:

1990, 1996-2005
City of Southfield

1990

1996

1997

2002

2003

2004

2005

Labor Force

43 ,405

46 ,514

47,251

47,825

48 ,660

43 ,971

43,487

42,844

42,451

42 ,031

41 ,994

Employment
Unemployment

40,495

44,624

46,275

47,116

42,332

41 ,042

39 ,956

39 ,428

38 ,997

38,941

2,910

1,890

45,603
1,648

1,550

1,544

1,639

2,445

2,888

3,034

3,053

6.7

4.1

3 .5

3.2

3.2

3.7

5.6

6.7

3 ,023
7.1

7.2

7.3

Jobless Rate

City of Farmington Hills

1990

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Labor Force

43,311

46,903

47,755

46,169

45,339

44 ,482

44,010

41 ,492

46 ,725

48 ,276

42,536

41 ,973

43,559
41 ,515

4.2

2.5

1,030
2.2

969
2

965
2

45,065
1,104

43 ,692

1,819

45,722
1,181

48,383
47,414

49 ,241

Employment
Unemployment
Jobless Rate

1,647
3.6

1,946
4.4

2,037
4.6

2,044
4.7

2.4

2005
43 ,512
41 ,455
2,057
4.7

City of Livonia

1990

- ment

1996

1997

1998

1999

Labor Force

53,946

55,747

56,067

56 ,267

'

52,138
1,808

54,575
1,172

55 ,025
1,042

55,293
974

3.4

2.1

1.9

1.7

1.7

,

loyment
Rate

.:,S

Southfield -

~--

2000

2001

2002

56 ,740

54,124

53,324

55,798
942

53,271
853
1.6

52,127

51 ,692
50,287

1,197
2.2

1,405
2.7

2003

2004

2005

51 ,029

50,557

49 ,384
1,645

48,918

50,104
48,469

1,639

1,635

3.2

3.2

3.3

Economic Development Appendlx-28

�,. .. ·;nf Novi

=Labor Force

1990

1996

1997

19,390
18,508

20,968
20,395

21 ,342

Unemployment

882

Jobless Rate

4.5

573
2.7

500
2.3

Employment

20,842

1998
21 ,619
21,149

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

22,002

28,308

27,711

27,136

26 ,831

26,551

27,800

26 ,953

26,240

470

21 ,534
468

896

2.1

758
2.7

25 ,610
941

2.2

508
1.8

25,893
938

3.3

3 .5

3.5

2005
26,520
25,573
947
3.6

City of Troy

1990

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Labor Force

41 ,602

45,144

45,982

46,595

47,425

46 ,170

45 ,363

44,518

44,050

43,601

43 ,553

Employment

40 ,053

44,138

45,105

45 ,770

46 ,603

45,022

43 ,650

42,495

41 ,933

41,476

41,415

1,549

1,006
2.2

877

825

822

1,148

1,713

2,023

2,117

2,125

2,138

1.9

1.8

1.7

2.5

3.8

4.5

4.8

4.9

4.9

Unemployment
Jobless Rate

3.7

Economic Development Appendix-29

�Analysis of Firms in City of Southfield
This appendix contains data from Hoovers Business Information Service and Reference USA. The data from both
sources was made available to DTIA and the City of Southfield by the Oakland County Department of Planning and
Development. We have attempted to analyze the data as best we could. The primary useful of the data is to provide
firm demographics for the City. The two databases are quite different and therefore no attempt was made to compare
the data or reconcile the differences.

Hoover's Business Data: Southfield Firms by Industry Sector, 2006

•

CONSTRUCTION

45

MANUFACTURING

46

WHOLESALE TRADE

48

RETAIL TRADE

49

TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING

50

INFORMATION

51

FINANCE AND INSURANCE

52

REAL ESTATE, RENT AL &amp; LEASING

54

PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, &amp; TECHNICAL SERVICES

55

MANAGEMENT OF COMPANIES AND ENTERPRISES

58

ADMINISTRATIVE, SUPPORT, WASTE MANAGEMENT, &amp; REMEDIATION SERVICES

58

EDUCATIONAL SERVICES

60

HEAL TH CARE AND SOCIAL ASSISTANCE

60

ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT, &amp; RECREATION

62

ACCOMMODATION &amp; FOOD SERVICES

63

OTHER SERVICES

63

Economic Development Appendix-30

�Construction

23: Construction

2361

2362

•

2371
2372

2373

2381

2382

2389

•

Residential Building Construction
Arco Construction Company Inc
C &amp; J General Contractors Inc
Fred E Greenspan Builder Inc
Kay Bee Construction Company Lie
Kay Bee Lie
Land Of Lakes Limited Partnership
Mar-Que General Contractors Inc
Mht Housing Nonprofit Housing Corp
S &amp; S Bu ilders Inc
Two Lakes Building Corporation
Mht Housing , Inc
Mht Properties Xvii Inc
Atlas - Filmore Lumber Company
Bobson Construction Co Inc
Dewitt Bu ilding Company Inc
Fairway Construction Co
Good Housekeeping Construction , Inc
Wineman &amp; Komer Building Company
Nonresidential Building Construction
Barton Malow Company
Burton Brothers General Contractors L. C
D &amp; S Contractors Inc
E L Bailey Company, Inc
Huntington Construction Co
Utility System Construction
Service Construction Lie
Land Subdivision
A P G M Lim ited Partnership
lnvestico Development Corp
J A Bloch &amp; Company
Medpark Inc
Nyco Investments &amp; Company
Real Estate Development And Investment Company, Inc
Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
The Dewey Group Lie
Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors
Sova Steel Inc
O'neill Masonry Construction Company
Robovitsky Construction Inc
Reid Glass Co , Inc
Arnold Goodman
Building Equipment Contractors
S &amp; M Heating Sales Company
S &amp; M Sheet Metal Ltd
United Painting Inc
Other Specialty Trade Contractors
American Carpet Engineers, Inc
American Pool Service Company
Statewide Disaster Restoration , Inc

~out~field

Revenue
($
million)

Emplo~ees

1.6
5.0
1.1
1.0
1.7
2.3
1.0
36.0
1.0
1.5
1.7
1.4
9.0
9.0
1.4
1.9
1.1
1.2

3
40
3
12
20
20
11
14
12
9
8
10
25
20
18
30
12
20

1,080.0
23.5
3.5
5.3
2.1

243
54
28
14
15

Ml
Ml
Ml

1.4

15

Ml

3.6
3.1
1.8
3.4
2.9
6.1

25
20
11
25
19
74

1.1

10

8.8
1.0
7.0
2.4
3.4

45
31
40
20
14

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

4.8
5.9
4.6

50
60
100

Ml
Ml

1.0
1.0
1.9

16
20
30

Ml

State Of
Incorporation
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml

Economic Development Appendix-31

�Manufacturing

31-33: Manufacturing

3118

3133
3141

3161
3219
3231

•

3251
3252
3255

3261

3279
3311
3315
3322
3323

•

3326
3327
3328

Revenue
($
million)

Emplo}'.ees

Bakeries and Tortilla Manufacturing
1.4
The Bake Station Inc
The Bakers Choice Company
3.3
Textile and Fabric Finishing and Fabric Coating Mills
Vtec Technologies, Lie
2.9
Textile Furnishings Mills
Arden Corporation
36 .6
Benhar Products International Inc
5.0
Krams Enterprises Inc
49 .9
Leather and Hide Tanning and Finishing
GST AutoLeather, Inc.
292 .1
Other Wood Product Manufacturing
Architectural Millwork Specialist, Inc
1.9
Printing and Related Support Activities
Addison Graphic Solutions, Inc
3.0
Behrmann Printing Company Inc
1.5
Future Reproductions Inc
1.2
Grigg Graphic Services , Inc
3.1
Nationwide Envelope Specialists Inc
4.0
Complete Document Management Corporation
1 .1
Dunn Blue Print Company
10.0
Basic Chemical Manufacturing
Lumigen Inc
5.9
Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing
Detrex Corporation
81 .9
Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing
Piceu Group Limited
15.8
United Paint And Chemical Corp
13.9
Plastics Product Manufacturing
Abe Group Holdings Inc
29 .0
Advanced Card Technology, Lie
4.6
Automotive Compnent Systems, Inc
4.3
Automotive Component Systems Of Michigan, Inc
1.5
Lear Corporation Eeds And Interiors
367.8
Lear Corporation Global Development, Inc
15.4
Lear Operations Corporation
17.1
Zanini Usa Inc
1.0
Other Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
The R J Marshall Company
35.0
Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Manufacturing
General Manufacturing &amp; Design, Inc
2.5
Foundries
Cmi-Management Services, Inc
20 .1
Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing
Cothery Investment Company
4.0
Architectural and Structural Metals Manufacturing
Jaimes Industries Inc
1.4
Capital Welding Inc
16.1
Lattimore &amp; Tessmer Inc
2.1
Spring and Wire Product Manufacturing
Peterson American Corporation
77.9
Machine Shops; Turned Product; and Screw, Nut, and Bolt Manufacturing
Air-Matic Products Company, Inc
4.7
Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

~uthfi~d.

State Of
Incorporation

14
49
30

MA

50

Ml

4
7

CA

60
25

Ml

48

Ml
Ml
Ml

25
20
18
14
20
28

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

40

Ml

10

Ml

99

Ml

100

Ml

1
15
Ml
Ml
10

16

Ml

19

Ml

20
Ml
35
11

Ml

180

Ml

35

Ml
Ml

53

Ml

Economic Development Appendlx-32

�3329

3332
3335

3339

3359
3361
3363

•
3391

•

Rmt Woodworth Incorporated
Bio-Coat Inc
Bio-Vac Inc
X-Cel Industries Inc
Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
Maxitrol Company
Mack Industries, Inc
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Hayes Lemmerz International - Southfield, Inc
Metalworking Machinery Manufacturing
Select Steel Fabricators Inc
Bradley-Thompson Tool Company
Satellite Engineering &amp; Manufacturing Inc
Innovative Creations, Ltd
Other General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing
Comau Pico Holdings Corp
Comau Pico Inc
Sterling Scale Company
Global Electronics Limited
Other Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing
Syndevco, Inc
Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Morris Associates Inc
Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing
Federal-Mogul Piston Rings Inc
Kus Michigan, Lie
Federal-Mogul Corporation
DENSO International America, Inc.
Imported Auto Electric Exchange Corp
Collins &amp; Aikman Corporation
Lear Corporation
Meridian Automotive Systems-Detroit Operations, Inc
Questor Partners Fund I Lp
Oualitor, Inc.
Comer Holdings Lie
D T I Molded Products Inc
Federal-Mogul Products Inc
Prestolite Wire Corporation
Op Acquisition 2, Inc
Teksid Aluminum North America, Inc
Tractech Inc
Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Msx International Business Services, Inc
Shulman And Kaufman Inc
Lettering Inc Of Michigan
Visual Productions Inc
Federal-Mogul Dutch Holdings Inc
Federal-Mogul Powertrain , Inc
Federal-Mogul Puerto Rico Inc
Felt Products Manufacturing Co
Fm International Lie
Mather Seal Company
Mccord Sealing Inc
Custom Corporation Of America
Royal Distributors Of Michigan, Inc
Sepia Packaging, Inc
Universal Wholesale Inc

$outhfiel_g_

2.6
3.7
2.0
2.6

40
65
40
50

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

36.5
2.3

30

Ml
Ml

17.2

Ml

2.0
1.8
1.2
1.2

15
30
22
20

135.4
135.4
2.1
3.3

250
23
39

DE
Ml
Ml
Ml

4.1

31

Ml

2.2

26

Ml

75.0
1.6
6,286.0
831 .8
1.7

15
25

DE

385
12

17,089.2
21.2
165.1
180.0
77.5
2.8
279.8

281
200
1500
5

134.0
5.0
16.5

20
20
45

6.4
3.0
2.0
4.8
6.9
46.2
1.4
1.1
2.2
18.1
1.3
1.3
9.1
1.0
20.0

35
60

10
2600

10
25
15
8
20
15
2
235
18
12
20
10

Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
DE
Ml
DE
DE
Ml

Ml
Ml
MO
DE
Ml
DE

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendix-33

�Wholesale Trade

42: Wholesale Trade

4231

4232
4233

4234

•
4235

4236

4237

•

4238

Revenue
($
million)

Emplolees

Motor Vehicle and Motor Vehicle Parts and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers
W A Rucker &amp; Associates
10.7
Abe Group Sales &amp; Marketing Inc
4.5
Auma Engineered Products Inc
2.1
Automotive Refinish Technologies Inc
37.8
Barr, Terry Sales Lie
2.2
Gerard Thomas Company Inc
2.7
Kenmar Corporation
8.5
Furniture and Home Furnishing Merchant Wholesalers
Sci Floor Covering Inc
16.4
Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Ryan Building Materials Inc
12.6
T J Ceramic Tile Sales And Imports Inc
11 .0
North Coast Commerical Roofing Systems
3.0
Professional and Commercial Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers
Dictation Sales &amp; Services, Inc
17.0
Sales Control Systems Inc
2.5
Arzo Electronics Incorporated
1.8
Michigan Business Machines Inc
1.6
Pathtrace Systems, Inc
1.4
Resource Data Systems Corporation
2.2
The Henninger Corporation
6.3
Universal Solutions Inc
3.7
Med Share Inc
5.1
Medsupply Corporation , Inc
5.0
Northland Radiology, Inc
2.8
Phoenix Medical Supply , Inc
2.4
Wolverine X-Ray Sales &amp; Service Inc
2.5
Applied Image Products Incorporated
5.0
Metal and Mineral (except Petroleum) Merchant Wholesalers
Advance Steel Company
11 .1
Alliance Steel Inc
4.3
Copper &amp; Brass Sales Inc
100.0
Copper and Brass Sales
Dofasco Usa Inc
2.3
Kobe Coating Company
2.5
Nance Steel Sales, Inc
2.5
ThyssenKrupp Materials NA, Inc.
Electrical and Electronic Goods Merchant Wholesalers
Allied Electric Supply Company
9.4
Michigan Chandel ier Company Inc
11.4
Pegasus Theatrical Inc
3.0
Robert Milsk Company Inc
1.7
Hardware, and Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers
Air Design, Inc
2.6
Flo Co Supply Inc
9.1
R L Deppmann Company
22.0
Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers
Wolverine Tractor &amp; Equipment Co Inc
20.2
Corrsys-Datron Sensorsystems, Inc
2.0
Gt Technology Company Inc
4.6

~ outhfielcL

State Of
Incorporation

45
40
14
25
30
60

Ml
DE
Ml
Ml

26

Ml

35
30
12

Ml
Ml
Ml

35
29
12
21
10
15

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

25
50
30
16
15
20
17

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

50
12
150

Ml

10
11
11

Ml
DE
DE
Ml
DE

20
15
14
4

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

10
18
31

Ml

45
12
30

Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml

Economic Development Appendtx-34

�4239
4241

4244
4246

4248
4249

J &amp; L Industrial Supply
Rayhaven Equipment Company Inc
General Tape &amp; Supply Inc
Brown, Sam Sales Company
Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers
Rocky International Inc
Paper and Paper Product Merchant Wholesalers
Rose Business Forms Company
Stylus Inc
Grocery and Related Product Merchant Wholesalers
International Wholesale, Inc
Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers
Ain Plastics Of Michigan Inc
0 P Noma Inc
Parts Cleaning Technologies, Lie
Roman Cleanser Products
Beer, Wine, and Distilled Alcoholic Beverage Merchant Wholesalers
Elite Brands Of Michigan
Miscellaneous Nondurable Goods Merchant Wholesalers
Southwind Enterprises Inc

257.5
9.0
3.8
3.2

300
30
30

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

2.3

13

Ml

6.5
11 .0

35
8

Ml
Ml

35.9

54

Ml

6.9
100.0
9.0
3.9

35
500
2
22

5.4

25

3.3

25

Revenue
($
million)

Emplo~ees

Ml

Retail Trade

•

44-45: Retail Trade

4411

4421

4422

4431
4441

4451

•

4452

Automobile Dealers
A &amp; R Motors Inc
Art Moran Pontiac Gmc Inc
Field's Inc
Ford Avis Inc
Glassman Oldsmobile Inc
Page Toyota Inc
Southfield Jeep-Eagle
Star Lincoln Mercury Inc
Tamaroff Buick Inc
Tamaroff Dodge Inc
Furniture Stores
All-Star Desk Co
German's Warehouse Inc
Home Furnishings Stores
Hob Enterprises Lie
Oakland Investment Inc
Premier Blind Factory L L C
The Print Gallery Inc
Electronics and Appliance Stores
Wireless Avenue
Building Material and Supplies Dealers
21300 8 Mile Rd Assoc Lie
United Paint Retail Centers Inc
Grocery Stores
Hiller Inc
Majestic Market, Inc
One Stop Kosher Market Inc
Southfield Save A Lot Food Store
Safeway Food Center Inc
Specialty Food Stores

~out~fi_eld.

5.3
36.2
4.3
81.7
18.4
53.4
56 .9
18.9
53 .6
25.1

20
19
94
107
72
160
80

State Of
lncoreoration
DE
DE
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

1.6
1.6

16
13

Ml

8.5
4.6
1.7
1.0

100
70
25
10

Ml

1.4

20

5.6
2.6

40
32

64.8
3.1
6.6
2.3
2.5

13
14
30
25
25

Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendlx-35

�4461

4471

4481

4483

4511
4529
4531
4532
4539
4543

Star Corned Beef Center Inc
Superior Meats Inc
Health and Personal Care Stores
Daring Corporation
D O C Optics Corporation
Detroit Optical Co
See Inc
Gasoline Stations
Brighton, Lie
Cloverleaf Amoco &amp; Grill
D &amp; D Services Inc
Mobil 1 Inc
Clothing Stores
Max Green's Men's Wear Inc
C'est La Vie Sportswear Inc
Greens Max Kids Wear Inc
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Of Southfield, Inc
Sun's Clothing Co Inc
Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Bednarsh, Morris Jewelry Design &amp; Mfg Ltd
Darakjian Jewelers Inc
Gornbein, Norman Jewelry &amp; Loan Inc
House Of Watchbands Inc
Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores
International Golf Enterprises Inc
Other General Merchandise Stores
Dollar Castle Inc
Florists
Tfi Enterprises Inc
Office Supplies, Stationery, and Gift Stores
Specifications Service Company
Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers
Mcdonald Modular Solutions, Inc
Direct Selling Establishments
Vesco Oil Corporation

1.9
1.8

30
10

Ml
Ml

3.5
62.6
2.0
2.8

3

Ml

16
50

Ml
Ml

6.0
1.7
1.6
1.3

25
14
13
11

4.1
3.9
1.9
6.5
1.5

37
4
50
100
15

Ml
Ml

2.3
4.2
2.1
2.4

13
17
15
17

Ml
Ml
Ml

4.0

5

3.5

8

Ml

9.6

14

Ml

1.3

15

Ml

9.9

2

Ml

109.1

Ml

Transportation and Warehousing

48-49: Transportation and Warehousing

4841
4855
4859
4885

4931

General Freight Trucking
Murrell Enterprises Inc
Charter Bus Industry
National Trails, Inc
Other Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation
Reddi-Ride Transportation Inc
Freight Transportation Arrangement
Cast North America
F X Coughlin Co
Rpl Associates Inc
Warehousing and Storage
Federal-Mogul Venture Corporation

Revenue
($
million)

Emelo~ees

State Of
lncoreoration

4.4

Ml

1.3

Ml

1.8

26

Ml

3.0
59 .2
6.5

34
375
16

Ml
Ml

51.0

1000

Economic Development Appendix-36

�Information

51: Information

5111

5112

5121

5122
5151

5152
5171

5172

5173
5179

5181

5182

5191

Newspaper, Periodical, Book, and Directory Publishers
Detroit Free Press
Detroit Jewish News, Lie
Jewish Community Online Lie
Lawrence Street Publications
Software Publishers
Computer Mail Services Inc
Global Information Systems
Master Data Center, Inc
Motion Picture and Video Industries
CV Media Inc
Christian Television Network Inc
The Production People Ltd
Hantz Air Lie
Milagro Post Lie
Tv 26 Detroit Inc
Sound Recording Industries
Gold Productions , Limited
Radio and Television Broadcasting
The Word Network
Wwj 950 Am
Channel 7 Of Detroit Inc
Community Media Agency, Inc
New World Communications Of Detroit, Inc
Viacom Television Station Inc
Wxon Inc
Cable and Other Subscription Programming
Scripts Networks
Wired Telecommunications Carriers
Adval Communications, Inc
Internet Operations Center
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite)
Answering Service Inc
Video Vision Inc
Telecommunications Resellers
Ldmi Telecommunications
Other Telecommunications
Epac Lie
Q-Media Inc
Internet Service Providers and Web Search Portals
Anx E-Business Corp
Drive Repair Service Corporation
Mirror Imaging Lie
Data Processing, Hosting, and Related Services
Actiondata Inc
ANXeBusiness Corp.
Computer Consultants Of America, Inc
Data Direction Inc
Gee Servicing Systems
Open Solutions Inc
Peter Chang Enterprises Inc
Other Information Services
W W Enterprises Inc

~o_ut~field

Revenue
($
million)

Emelo~ees

1.2
2.9
2.9
2.8

32
57
61
26

1.1
10.8
7.8

100
98

1.2
1.8
1.9
3.0
1.7
1.8

13
20
21
20
17
18

Ml
Ml

3.5

18

Ml

1.3
5.2
25.3
1.9
22.1
11 .3
6.1

30
90
240
30
212
120
37

Ml
Ml
DE
DE
DE

1.5

17

4.2
3.5

21

7.5
2.4

40
30

Ml

57.2

250

Ml

3.9
3.5

19
30

5.7
2.5
1.7

50
6
3

Ml

4.9
8.9
10.2
4.5
1.1
4.9
1.0

100

Ml

60
22
73
18

Ml

1.5

20

Ml

State Of
Incorporation

Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml

Ml

Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendix-37

�Finance and Insurance

52: Finance and Insurance

5221

5222

5223

5231
5239

Depository Credit Intermediation
Sterling Bank &amp; Trust, Fsb
Central Corporate Credit Union
Peoples Trust Credit Union
Telcom Credit Union
Nondepository Credit Intermediation
Automotive Credit Corporation
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Bergin Financial , Inc
Et &amp; A Funding Lie
Franklin Home Lending Group Inc
Homestead Usa Inc
Major Mortgage Corporation
Mercury Financial , Inc
Mortgage Center Le
Mvb Mortgage Corporation
Remington Mortgage, Inc
Stratford Funding , Incorporated
Tranex Financial Inc
US Mutual Financial Corp Inc
Washington Mortgage Company
GMAC Commercial Finance
Gmac Commercial Finance, Lie
Activities Related to Credit Intermediation
Americare Mortgage Corporation
Capital Mortgage Funding Lie
Cms Mortgage Group Inc
Creative Mortgage Lending
First Mountain Mortgage, Corp
Five Star Mortgage Inc
Fmf Capital Lie
Infinity Mortgage Corp
lnvestaid Corporation
Marathon Financial Corporation
Michigan Fidelity Acceptance Corporation
Mortgage Acceptance Corp
Mortgage Planners Inc
Nationwide Investment Services Corporation
Odoms Financial Grp
Orian Financial
Pathway Financial Lie
Real Financial, LL C
Rockwell Mortgage Inc
Strategists, Inc
Service Centers Corporation
Central Clearing Co /Cash Now, Partners, Lim ited Partnership
Security Financial Services, Inc
Securities and Commodity Contracts Intermediation and Brokerage
Capital Investment Group, Lie
Other Financial Investment Activities
Wind Point Partners V L P
Advance Capital Group Inc
Advance Capital Services Inc

~u__!_~field.

Revenue
($
million)

Emplo~ees

45.9
75.4
5.9
21 .0

194
80
35
56

Ml
Ml

19.0
201 .3
2.0
3.4
1.4
21.8
1.2
17.0
7.9
6.6
1.1
3.1
6.1
1.1
4.0
13.0
202.7

67

Ml
Ml
Ml
CA

2.3
5.4

5.3
1.1
1.2
3.1
25.7
2.0
3.3

100
18
20
50
16
25
36
47
15
40
38
11
38

State Of
Incorporation

Ml

Ml
Ml
OH
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

200
25
70
45
15
40
330
15
45

4.4

64.3
5.2
1.1
30.2
1.3
62.0
10.2
2.0
1.7
2.6
37.6
6.0
550.0

29
22
29
75
60
12

1.3

16

3.9
9.1
5.0

19

84

57
15
16
18
23

16

Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendix-38

�50
20

Ml

15
80

Ml

15.0

Sigma Investment Counselors

1.4

14

Ml

Coop Network

1.2

15

1.4
25 .6

12
25

Hantz Financial SeNices, Inc
New Atlantis Financial Inc
Norris Financial Inc
PM FA Inc

Horizon Properties Inc
Questor Management Company LLC

5241

2.0
1.3

Ml

Ml

Sam Brown Company

2.1

Six Mile/Newburgh Venture Inc

1 .1

10

Ml

Trisource Group, Inc
Wind Point Partners

2.8

28
11

Ml

Wind Point Partners Vi, LP
Insurance Carriers
James E Jackson Agency Inc

61 .3
43.4

4.0

17

9.1

33

Ml

23.9

84
150

Great Lakes Health Plan , Inc.

42 .3
14.9

Ml
Ml

Health Plan Of Michigan, Inc

16.8

52

Ml

Blue Care Network of Michigan
Cam Administrative SeNices , Inc
Cape Health Plan , Inc
Great Lakes Health Plan Inc

MI DA Inc
PPOM , LLC
American Fellowship Mutual Insurance Co
First Mercury Insurance Company
Gmac Insurance Holdings
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
Motors Insurance Corporation
North Pointe Holdings Corporation
Star Insurance Company
Stewart Title Of Detroit Inc

5242

33 .2

American Public Entity Access Pools
Agencies, Brokerages, and Other Insurance Related Activities
AM Levin Insurance Associates Inc
Acordia Of Michigan, Inc
Capital Title Insurance Agency Inc
Comerica Insurance SeNices, Inc
Cornish , Zack, Hill And Associates Inc
Coverx Corporation
Detroit Title Insurance Agency Inc
Employee Health Insurance Management
First Mercury Financial Corporation
Group Associates, Inc
Huntington Affiliates, Inc
J S Clark Agency, Inc
Korotkin Insurance Group
Korotkin Insurance Group Inc
Mccurry Inc
Meadowbrook Inc
Nette &amp; Associates Inc
North Pointe Financial SeNices Inc
North Pointe Insurance Co Inc
Primerica Financial SeNices
Professional Life Underwriters SeNices, Inc
Property &amp; Casualty Solutions
Ralph C W ilson Agency Inc
The Albrecht Companies Inc
The Guarantee Company Of North America Usa

Southfield
~
--

Ml

Ml

50.3
129.5
10.2
6.6
3,983.4
304.0

43

Ml

100
176
350

DE
Ml

90 .5

7

Ml

158.1
4.7

240
25

Ml
Ml

5.1

20

4.1

50

Ml

7.6
2.3

70
10

Ml
Ml

2.9
1.9

25
21

Ml

6.3
2.9

80

Ml

2.3
130.8

20

Ml

3.4

40

1.4

30

Ml
Ml

5.0
3.4

24
40

Ml

4.9

60
100

Ml
Ml

262
10

Ml
Ml

120

Ml

48
1

Ml

25

Ml

2.3
304.0
1.0
12.4
32.7
2.3
2.2
2.2
3.4
2.7
1.9

25
30
30
19

Ml
Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendix-39

�United Insurance Co
Zervos Agency Inc

3.8
1.3

35
14

Zervos Group, Inc
Associated Claim And Investigation Service, Inc

3.4
1.5

30
16

Butler &amp; Associates Adjusting

1.4

11

Ml
Ml

Globe Midwest Corporation
Evaluation Group Inc

3.0

26

Ml

2.3
3.0

20

Ml

35
10

Ml

4.5

12

Ml

3.0

23

American Benefit Group

5259

American Risk Pooling Consultants Inc
Other Investment Pools and Funds
RE Investments Inc
Davis And Davis Consulting Lie
Fifty Strong Inc
Origen Financial Lie
Origen Financial , Inc.
Plante &amp; Moran Investment Partnership
Sun Communities, Inc.

1.8

2.3

25

26.5
74.0

125

50.0

500

211.6

65

Ml
Ml

DE

Real Estate, Rental &amp; Leasing
Revenue
State Of
Incoreoration

($

53: Real Estate, Rental &amp; Leasing
5311

•

5312

•

million)

Lessors of Real Estate
200 River Place Lofts Assoc
Ari-El Limited Partnership I
Hartman And Tyner, Inc
Southfield Limited Dividend Housing Association
The Fountains At Franklin Retirement Community Inc
The Trowbridge
Wingate Management Corp
York Properties Inc
Ziecor Inc
A Ii Lp
Brownstown One Lie
Equitable Group Inc
First Center Office Plaza
H Salt Esquire Management Co
Kaftan Enterprises Inc
Macomb Mall Associates Limited Partnership
North Management Inc
Park Shelton Associates Limited Partnership
Park West Properties Inc
Pontiac Mall Limited Partnership
R C &amp; T Land Company
Schostak Brothers &amp; Company, Inc.
Seven Mile/ Farmington Inc
Sosnick Family Limited Partnership
Van Masters Management Inc
Apex Management Inc
Joseph Fetter
Offices of Real Estate Agents and Brokers
Amurcon Corporation
Ari-El Enterprises, Inc
Berger Realty Group, Inc
Bre/Southfield Lie
Century 21 Professional Realty

Emplo~ees

2.3
1.3
24.3
1.8
2.0

100
13

Ml

30

Ml

30
80
50

1.4
2.0
1 .1
1.5

20

Ml

9

Ml
Ml

5
20

1.2
1.8
1.0
1.2

30
11
21

1.0

10

1.3

6
100

4.5
1.2
1.2

Ml
Ml
Ml

9

5.0

10
100

2.0
1.5

27
25

3.5
5.3

100

Ml
Ml

2.8
6.4
2.3

50
10

Ml
Ml

55

1.0

13

4.4

28

Ml

1.6

18

Ml

2.6
1.5
1.0

22
50

Ml
Ml

30

Economic Development Appendlx-40

Southfield

c;;:::r----.-

--

-

---

--

-

-

----- --

-

�5313

•

5321
5322

5324
5331

2.4
2.8
4.0
1.2
1.0
2.1
1.5
1.3
3.8
1.0
2.9
1.3
1.6
1.6
1.0
1.0
2.1
1.9

73
125
30
40
25
80
50
40
10
28
3
25
12
25
10

1.3
2.8
3.7
1.1
1.0
7.2

20
25
100
41
30
19

1.0

27

7.9

30

1.8
1.9
5.2

28
25
80

Ml
Ml

2.6

35

Ml

7.0
1.0

5
6

Ml
Ml

Revenue
($
million)

Emplo~ees

1.0
7.4
1.4
3.2
2.0
1.1
3.2
1.8
1.6
1.8
1.6
2.5

18
100
22
50
30
15
50
30
20
30
20
30

Ctt Partners Lie
Farbman Management Group Of Michigan Inc
Forbes/Cohen Properties
Franklin Terrace Apartments, Lie
Highland Management Company L L C
Huntington Management Lie
lnfiniti Property Management
lnsite Commercial Group Lie
Jem Marketing, Inc
Judy Walker &amp; Associates Inc
Max Broock Realtors
Nemer Property Group Inc
Phoenix Place Ldha Lp
Redico Management Inc
Ron Simpson &amp; Associates Inc
Sadie Rose
Schostak Financial Co
Seligman &amp; Associates Inc
Signature Associates-ONCOR International
Sib Management Inc
Sun Home Services Inc
The Farbman Group Inc
Ushman &amp; Wakefield Of Michigan Inc
V &amp; F Realty And Management Inc
Wyndham &amp; Associates, Inc
Activities Related to Real Estate
The Lexington Of Southfield
Automotive Equipment Rental and Leasing
Axis Vehicle Services Inc
Consumer Goods Rental
Alert Medical Inc
Starr Home Health Care Inc
Blue Water Technologies Group, Inc
Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing
Allingham Corporation
Lessors of Nonfinancial Intangible Assets (except Copyrighted Works)
Kasapis Bros Inc
Metropolitan Franchise Corporation

Ml

Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

10

80
35

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
GA

Professional, Scientific, &amp; Technical Services

54: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

5411

•

Legal Services
Bassey And Selesko Pc
Brooks Kushman P C
Carter &amp; Gebauer
Collins, Einhorn &amp; Farrell, P C
David Ruskin
Erlich Rosen &amp; Bartnick Corp
Fieger &amp; Fieger, P C
Freid, Saperstein &amp; Abatt Pc
Gary D Nitzkin Pc
Gittleman &amp; Paskel Pc
Gold &amp; Lange &amp; Majoros Pc
Goodman &amp; Acker Inc

~utf:field.

State Of
Incorporation

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendix-41

�•

5412

5413

•

Gursten, Koltonow, Gursten, Christensen &amp; Raitt Pc
Hoffman &amp; Wartell
Howard Zoller
Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer &amp; Weiss, Professional Corporation
John Artz Pc
Kluczynski , Girtz, Zamler, Mccubbrey
Kupelian Ormond &amp; Magy, A Professional Corporation
Law Firm Of Bernstein Pc
Leikin And Ingber, PC
Levine Benjam in Tushman Bratt Jerris And Stein Pc (Inc)
Maddin Hauser Wartell Roth Heller &amp; Pesses Attorneys
Matt G Curtis
Meklir, Nolish, Friedman &amp; Associates Pc
Miller Shpiece &amp; Tischler P C
Mindell, Panzer, Malin &amp; Kutinsky
Novara, Tesija &amp; Mcguire, PIie
Peter M Schneiderman &amp; Associates, P C
Raymond &amp; Prokop Pc
Robert M Pilcowitz P C
Romain, Kuck, &amp; Egerer, Pc
Seyburn Kahn Ginn Bess &amp; Serlin Professional Corp
Siemion, Huckabay, Bodary, Padilla, Morganti &amp; Bowerman P C
Sommers Schwartz Silver &amp; Schwartz Professional Corp
Sullivan Ward Asher &amp; Patton Pc
Thomas, Degrood &amp; Witenoff &amp; Hoffman Pc
Zamler, Mellen, Shiffman
Del Process Services Inc
Records Deposition Service Inc
Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Plante &amp; Moran, LLP
Zalenko &amp; Associates P C
Accesspoint Lie
Kirschner Hutton Shevin, P C
P &amp; M Holding Group Lip
Report Systems Inc
Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services
Barton Malow Design, Inc
Cdpa Architects Inc
Etchen Gumma Ltd
Giff els, Inc
Harley Ellis Devereaux Corporation
Jga, Inc
Neumann / Smith And Associates Inc
Redstone Architects Inc
Rich &amp; Associates, Inc
Rossetti Associates Inc
Superior Engineering Associates Inc
Professional Grounds Service, Lie
Arcadis G&amp;M Of Michigan, Lie
Di Clemente Fiegel Design
Di Clemente Siegel Design Inc
Dsea Associates
Egslnc
Engineering Service Inc Of America
Engineering Solid Solutions, Inc.
Equilibrium Corp
Golden Eagle Aviation Inc
Hawtal Whiting Resource Solutions Inc

~o_uthfi~l_g_

1.4
5.5
2.0
12.9
1.7
1.8
3.0
4.9
2.0
2.6
6.8
5.9
2.3
1.1
1.9
1.2
1.6
5.0
1.6
2.4
6.1
2.1
1.2
9.2
1.1
7.1
1.3
2.6

31
16
20
75
25
38
90
32
20
130
15
47
30
70

1.9
61 .0
2.0
91 .7
1.1

40
1000
14
1
25

Ml

5.1
1.4
1.5
9.2
33.4
6 .0
2.9
1.2
2.5
4.0
2.0
1.8
2.9
4.3
7.3
3.8
6.2
6.4
3.0
2.8
1.1
1.6

78
22

Ml

10

Ml

24

60
31
180
21
30
35
21
30
40
100
80
35

Ml

Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

14

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml

130
50
50
11
21
40
17
30
50
60
70
75
75
60
9
20
25

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendix-42

�•

5414

5415

•
5416

•

Lear Technology Corporation
Quality Engineering Company
Ricardo Meda Technical Services Lie
Nelson-Mill Co
Echelon Technologies
Specialized Design Services
Ax Inc
Riegner &amp; Associates Inc
Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Best Computer Consulting Inc
Elysium Inc
Idea Consultants Incorporated
Ideation International Inc
lsystek Inc
Mil lennium Software Incorporated
Miracle Software Systems, Inc.
Ncode International , Inc
Plexus Technologies Inc
Provect Technologies Inc
Radley Corporation
Systems Services Inc
Technoserve
T echnosoft Corporation
The Detroit Gauge And Tool Company
Webrunners , Inc
Berbee Information Networks
Callitechnic Lie
Enco Systems, Inc
Ideal Technology Solutions US , Inc
Kpk Technologies, Inc
Liam Moore Associates Lie
Michigan Internet Association Ltd
Millennium Technical Consultants, Inc
Pac Resources usa Inc
RC M Technologies Inc
Sysware Healthcare Systems Inc
Xede Consulting Group Inc
Computerized Facility Integration , Lie
Data Express Co
Proforma Corporation
Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
AlixPartners , LLC
Bbk, Ltd
Caring Hands Management Co Lie
Ciena Health Care Management Inc
Consolidated Financial Corporation
Consultants lntrntl
Home Dental Management Group Lie
Innovative Training Integrators, Lie
Luftig &amp; Warren International Inc
Omni International Trading &amp; Consulting Corp
Perry Johnson Registrars Inc
Questor Partners Fund Ii, LP
Semperian , Inc
Toda Inc
United Information Technologies, Inc
Brown Rehabi litation Management Inc
Midwest Reemployment Associates Inc

~outhfiel~

3.5
1.5
9.0
1.8
2.2

60
15
123
45
60

Ml

1.1
1.2

16
21

Ml
Ml

1.7
4.6
2.5
1.8
3.5
24.6
25.5
2.8
4.0
1.0
8.5
1.6
1.4
45.0
2.9
4.8
2.4
1.2
4.7
8.0
1.5
2.2
1.2
1.7
2.4
4.0
14.9
1.4
2.9
1.2

20
11
35
22
43
95

Ml
CA
Ml

170.0
2.9
1.1
191.4
2.4
3.1
2.4
1.8
2.3
3.7
13.0
379.3
136.7
3.8
1.7
3.2
2.3

10
11
40
22
20
400
27
50
37
12
25
50
21
30
10
2
26
40
14
40
16

40
14
38
50
35
25
29
21
57
3
100
24
50
55

Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
DE
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml

Economic Development Appendix-43

�•

40
40

Batson &amp; Assoc
Jay R Slavsky, Inc

3.6
5.0

60
42

Ml

Park Avenue International

1.1

15
243

Ml

Barton Malow Enterprises , Inc
Creative Credit Solutions Lie
E-Business Partners, Inc
Gabriel Roeder Smith &amp; Company
Healthcare Management Solutions, Inc
John V Mccarthy &amp; Associates Inc
Jonna Construction Company, Lie
Metro Hospitalists Pc
Perry Johnson, Inc
Pmc America Inc
Pmc America Inc
Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc

•

1.1

Ml

69

Ml

15
13

Ml

1.0
30 .0

32

Ml

1.1

15

24.0

200
20
20

Ml

31

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

1.3
2.4
29.4

Ml

Sobel Co
Speeds he If Systems Inc

3.5
1.3

19
24

10.0

160

3.9
1 .1

10

Ml
Ml

15
50

Ml

Allecon Stock Associates Lie
Altech Environmental Services , Inc
Comprehensive Systems Inc
Net Results Group

5419

1.6
24.0

10
17

13

Vgs Consultants, Inc
Visual Productions, Inc
Wellness Institute Of America

5418

1.2

1.0

Star Trax, Inc

5417

51 .7

Smith Homes Resident Council Inc

Td Scan (US A), Inc

•

100.0

Ml

2.7

Synovalnc
The H R Management Group Inc

Ram soft Systems Inc
Tel-Adjust Inc
Scientific Research and Development Services
Molecular Innovations Inc
Advertising and Related Services
Alpha Omega Communications, Inc
GlobalHue
lmpatto Custom Marketing, Inc
Mars Advertising Company Incorporated
Mort Crim Communications Inc
Smith-Winchester Inc
Sussman , Sikes &amp; Associates Inc
W . B. Doner &amp; Company
Airfoil Public Relations, Inc.
Caponigro Publ ic Relations Inc.
Council Syrian
Motivational Marketing, Inc
Nouveau Design Studio
Alex Delvecchio Enterprises Inc
Craig Richard Promotional Products Inc
Custom Promotions Inc
Imperial Marketing Inc
Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Allison - Fisher International Lie
Crimmins &amp; Forman Marketing Research , Inc
Millward Brown International
Moore, Jack P &amp; Associates Inc
Opinion Search
R. L. Polk &amp; Co.

~outhflelcl.

3.2
3.5
2.3
1.0

55
20

Ml
Ml
Ml

2.2

35

6.0
8.8
2.0

25

Ml
Ml

10

Ml

7.2

99

Ml

1.7

10

5.2
61 .7

10
345

Ml
Ml
Ml

3.0
2.2

15

Ml

16

Ml

4.3
155.7

20
285

Ml
Ml

3.6

30

Ml

1.8

Ml

1.1
13.0

20
12
30

Ml

1.5

20

1.6

20

5.8
8.3
7.9

16
10

Ml
Ml

55

Ml

2.1

34

3.2
1.3

5
25

1.8
2.5

75

Ml
Ml
Ml
DE

Economic Development Appendix-44

�•

Shifrin-Hayworth Inc
Maynards Industries (1991 ), Inc

1.6
1.3

34
6

Ml
DE

Management of Companies and Enterprises
Revenue
($

55: Management of Companies and Enterprises
5511

Management of Companies and Enterprises
888 Big Beaver Associates Lie
M Kt Holdings Inc

million)
1.7
1.5

Employees
30
10

State Of
Incorporation

Ml

Administrative, Support, Waste Management, &amp; Remediation Services

56: Admin., Support, Waste Mgmt &amp; Remed Svcs

5611
5613

5614

•

~

Office Administrative Services
National Foot Care Program Inc
Employment Services
Acclaimed Home Care
Health Promotion Inc
M &amp; M Nursing Services Inc
Operation Able Of Michigan
Samaritan Private Duty Nursing, Inc
United Personnel, Inc
About Faces Productions
Affiliated Models Incorporated
American Temporary Resources Inc
Arcadia Health Services Inc
Arcadia Services, Inc
Charter School Administration Services, Inc
Contract Esolutions Group, Lie
Grayrose Inc
Staffpro America Inc
The Health Exchange
Transport Logistics, Inc
Contract People Corporation
Preferred Network Services Inc
Wel -Tek International Corporation
Business Support Services
Triumph Telecom Systems
Associated Community Service
Insight Teleservices, Inc
All State Credit Bureau Inc
Automated Collection Systems, Inc
First Recovery Group Lie
Goodman &amp; Poeszat PIie
TechTeam Global, Inc.
Johnson &amp; Associates Inc
A AN Company Inc
Comerica Leasing Corporation
Federation Of Independent
Goh's Inventory Service Inc

_ythfLeld.

Revenue
($
million)

Employees

1.4

25

1.9
1.8
2.1
1.7
1.5
1.9
1.1
1.4
2.1
110.0
110.0
3.3
2.5
2.8
1.9
1.6
2.5
1.5
2.0
2.2

60
30

1.2
9.8
4.9
1.1
1.2
4.0
1.0
166.5
2.5
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.4

State Of

20
25
100
10
20
100
25
60
200
50
60
75
12
140
45
20
125
12
300
145
25
23
17
20
256
99
15
25
33

Incoreoration

Ml

Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
DE
Ml
Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendlx-45

�•

5615

5616

5617

5619

5629

Jmac Commercial Finance
Lincoln Financial Distributors, Inc
Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Cadillac Travel Inc
Doneson World Class Travel
Hamilton, Miller, Hudson &amp; Fayne Travel Corporation-Agency , Inc
Selective Travel Management
Sky Bird Travel And Tour Inc
Investigation and Security Services
Cwn Escort &amp; Personal Protection Agency Inc
Guardian Guard Services, Inc
Nation Wide Services, Inc
Rsig Security, Inc
Guardian Armored Security Inc
All Type Security Inc
Guardian Medical Monitoring Inc
Progressive Security Concepts, Lie
Services to Buildings and Dwellings
Amon Facility Services
D &amp; K Services
Jani-King Of Michigan , Inc
Maintenance Management Corp
Ofs Acquisition , Inc
Preferred Building Services, Lie
Ruth Industries, Inc
Pie Maintenance Inc
Other Support Services
Alliance Steel Processing Inc
Southeast Michigan Chryslerplymouth Dealer Association Inc
Remediation and Other Waste Management Services
Eco Solutions 2000 Inc

2.4
2.6

65
70

4.3
3.0
14.2
1.5
12.1

18
14
50
14
24

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

1.0
17.1
13.6
17.6
5.7
1.7
1.4
5.0

10
400
25
700
25
23
38
250

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

3.4
1.0
6.5
3.3
5.8
3.4
1.0
10.3

350
38
24
40
12
150
100
150

Ml
Ml

1.5
1.5

50

Ml

1.8

20

Revenue
($
million)

Emplolees

7.1
1.3
1.2
2.6
2.9
1.2
141 .9

25
50
20
100
70
45
100

Ml

50 .2

525

Ml

1.4
1.2
9.2

20
10
160

Ml
Ml
Ml

1.6
10.6
1.5

41
99
57

Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml

Educational Services

61: Educational Services

6111

6113
6114

6115

•

Elementary and Secondary Schools
Academy Of Detroit North Association
Academy Of Warren
Advanced Technology Academy
Akiva Hebrew Day School
Beth Yehudah Yeshivath
Laurus Academy
Southfield Public School District
Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Lawrence Act Technological University
Business Schools and Computer and Management Training
Aress Corporation
Novatech Computer Training Center Inc
SC Group, Inc
Technical and Trade Schools
Academy Of Southfield
Ross Education, Lie
Specshoward School Of Broadcast Arts

~outhfielcl

State Of
Incoreoration

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendix-46

�•

Health Care and Social Assistance

62: Health Care and Social Assistance

6211

•

6212

•

6213
6214

Offices of Physicians
Associated Vision Consultants PIie
Associates In Dermatology, PC
Associates In Medicine Pc
Associates In Neurology Pc
Cardiovascular Associates Pc
Consultant In Sleep &amp; Pulmonary Medicine
Consultants In Ophthamalic And Facial Plastic Surgery Pc
Consulting Physicians Pc
David M Davis Md Pc
Doctors Referral Service Inc
Franklin Medical Consultants Pc
Glaucoma Center Of Michigan Pc
Heart Cardiology Consultants
Lewis &amp; Carney Pc
Lighthouse Hospice Lp
Martin E Tessler Md Pc
Med-Scan, Inc
Michigan Cornea Consultants Pc
Michigan Evaluation Group, Inc
Michigan Eyecare Institute Pc
Michigan Head &amp; Spine lnsitute PIie
Millennium Medical Group Pc
Nephron Associates Pc
Newland Medical Associates Pc
North West Eye Physicians Pc
Northland Anesthesia Associates Pc
Northwest Eye Physicians Inc
Northwest Ob-Gyn Associates, P C
Northwest Obgyn Inc
Ophthalmology Associates Pc
Pavilion Family Practice P C
Preferred Urology Consultants Pc
Pulmonary &amp; Internal Med Spec, Pc
Retina Consultants Inc
Retina Consultants Of Michigan Pc
Reynolds , Dr L &amp; Associates Pc
Sandberg, Kantor &amp; Eisenberg Md Pc
Shumer, Steven, Md &amp; Tessler, Inc
Southfield Obstetrical Inc
Southfield Radiology Associates, Pc
University Womes Care
Weissman, Gitlin &amp; Herkowitz Md Pc
William C Sharp Md
William Leuchter Md Pc
Women Care
Northwest Dermatology Group Pc
Offices of Dentists
Noah R Levi D D S
Professional Endodontics Pc
Offices of Other Health Practitioners
Tri-County Physical Therapy &amp; Rehabilitation Inc
Outpatient Care Centers

Southfield

~·

~

•

Revenue
($
million)

1.5
1.2
1.7
1.8
2.3
1.7
1.6
1.8
2.1
1.5
1.4
2.1
1.6
2.1
2.1
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.7
4.5
2.8
1.4
2.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.4

Emplolees

State Of
Incorporation

12
20
25
20
19
25
5
3
15
16
25
30
27
30
30
22
8
15
17

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

18

Ml

65
40
20
22
17
15
18
20
20

Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

1.0
1.7
1.4
4.9
1.0
1.7
1.4
1.7

20
20
20
25
27
40
18
20
15
29
20
30
15
24
20
30

3.5
1.2

40
30

Ml

1.3

40

Ml

1.4

1.4
1.7
1.9
5.5
1.0
1.4

Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml

Economic Development Appendix-47
4

�•

6215

6216

6219

6221
6223

•

6231

6232
6233

6239

6241

6243

6244

•

1.7
Southfield Dialysis Facility P C
7.7
Concentra Medical Centers
1.2
Education Training Research Services Inc
1.2
Northland Family Planning Clinic Inc
2.5
Sunshine Rehab Services Inc
Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories
7.0
Hospital Consolidated Laboratories
6.5
The Mobile Medical Group Inc
Home Health Care Services
4.0
Arcadia Health Care Inc
Arcadia Resources, Inc.
1.2
Care Solutions Network Inc
1.7
Chhc , Inc
1.0
Family Care Choice &amp; Services
1.3
Friendly Home Health Services
4.0
Health Care Partners Inc
11 .5
Health Partners, Inc
1.6
Home Health Network Inc
2.5
Pediatric Special Care Inc
Other Ambulatory Health Care Services
15.2
Community Emergency Medical Service Inc
10.0
Retail Health Network Inc
General Medical and Surgical Hospitals
881.9
Providence Hospital and Medical Centers
Specialty (except Psychiatric and Substance Abuse) Hospitals
13.8
Straith Hospital For Special Surgery Inc
Nursing Care Facilities
Lahser Hills Care Center
2.7
2.0
Lakeland Center
Medilodge Of Southfield, Inc
5.4
Samaritan Group Home Inc
1.4
2.0
Southfield Rehabilitation Company
Residential Mental Retardation, Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities
Easter Seal Society Of Southeastern Michigan Inc
6.7
Community Care Facilities for the Elderly
Evergreen Health And Living Center
1.8
Pediatrics Special Care
2.0
Presbyterian Villages Of Michigan
28.4
Other Residential Care Facilities
Angel's Place, Inc
1.4
St Francis Family Services Inc
1.7
Individual and Family Services
Luthern Adoption Service
1.1
Orchards Childrens Services, Inc
3.5
Spaulding For Children
7.7
Area Agency On Aging 1-B
37.0
Creative Images, Inc
5.7
Jewish Family Service Inc
2.1
Life For Relief And Development
10.6
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
Jewish Vocational Service &amp; Community Workshop
21 .0
The Art Of Winning Sales Training Inc
1.2
Child Day Care Services
Academy Of Detroit Schools
5.6

30
22
20
85

62

Ml

Ml
Ml

60
50
63
40
60
225
300
75
75

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

250
250

Ml
Ml

155

Ml

130
115
250
2
120

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

275

Ml

93
100
250

Ml
Ml

43
21

100
54
50
200
105
10

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

200
25

Ml
Ml

35

Ml

Arts, Entertainment, &amp; Recreation
l.,-;;$"oJJthfielg_

Economic Development Appendix-48

�•

71: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation

7114

7139

Revenue
($
million)

Agents and Managers for Artists, Athletes, Entertainers, and Other Public Figures
Brookdale Living Community Of Michigan
2.3
Gail &amp; Rice
1.8
Great Lake Technologies Group
1.2
National Medical Management, Inc
1.1
Sigma Management Services, Inc
2.6
U S Medical Management
6.0
Other Amusement and Recreation Industries
Bally Total Fitness International , Inc
19.4

Emplo~ees
60
60
25
24
15
180
25

State Of
lncoreoration

Ml

Ml

Accommodation &amp; Food Services

72: Accommodation and Food Services

7211

7221

•
7222

Traveler Accommodation
Carlton Essex Management
Global Equities &amp; Loans , Inc
Sayo, Inc
Midwest Lodging Inc
Full-Service Restaurants
12 Mile Southfield Big Boy 347
C A Muer Corporation
Darco Inc
Musashi International, Inc
R&amp;A Foods Inc
Ramrock, Inc
Suncoast Cafe &amp; Deli Inc
Sweet Lorraine's Inc
The Exchange Inc
Virtuoso Restaurant And Catering, Inc
Limited-Service Eating Places
Granader Family Reataurants Inc
Guy Enterprises
Jaydon Enterprises Inc
King Venture , Inc
Lou's Finer Delicatessen Inc
Scamadoni Inc
Tayvenlnc
The Brown Food Group Inc
Zoup! Fresh Soup Company, LLC

Revenue
($
million)

Emplo~ees

2.0
2.0
3.0
1.2

60
30
65
20

1.0
45.5
6.0
1.0
1.1
2.8
1.5
1.7
1.4
1.5

45
746
20
50
50
95
12

1.3
1.3
1.4
69.4
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.5

3
60
65
25
40
30
42
30

Revenue
($
million)

Emplo~ees

2.5
3.0
1.3
4.3

11
20
12
40

65
27

State Of
Incorporation

Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

Other Services

81: Other Services (except Public Administration)

8112

•

8114

Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance
Ameriflex Co Inc
Great Lakes Data Systems, Inc
Tower Computer Services Inc
Ultracom Inc
Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance
Brines Refrigeration, Heating &amp; Cooling Inc

Southfielcl
"'--~
--

~

State Of
Incorporation
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml

5.2
18
Ml
Economic Development Appendix-49

�•

8122
8123
8129

8131

8132
8133

8134

8139

•

•

Death Care Services
The Ira Kaufman Chapel Inc
Drycleaning and Laundry Services
Lois Gross Cleaners Inc
Other Personal Services
Estate Planning Institute Of Michigan Lie
Polk Carfax, Inc
Religious Organizations
Congregation Shaarey Zedek Inc
Faith Christian Academy
Grantmaking and Giving Services
National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Michigan Chapter (Inc)
Social Advocacy Organizations
Michigan Humane Society W
Children's Leukemia Foundation Of Michigan
Civic and Social Organizations
Alzheimers Assc Inc
Central State University
The Salvation Army
Business, Professional, Labor, Political, and Similar Organizations
Automotive Industry Action Group
Michigan Association Of Police 911
Brotherhood Of Maintenance Of Way Employees
Michigan Association For Public Employees
Five Thousand Town Center Condominium Assoc

2.5

23

Ml

1.4

30

Ml

2.0
4.6

12

2.6
2.4

90

Ml
Ml

1.2

30

Ml

1.3
1.5

30
12

Ml

3.1
1.5
3.4

45
100

Ml

9.5
1 .1
6.2
1.0
141.6

60
14
45
15
18

Ml
Ml

Ml

Reference USA Data: Southfield Firms by Industry Sector, 2006
CONSTRUCTION

65

MANUFACTURING

65

WHOLESALE TRADE

65

RETAIL TRADE

65

TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING

66

INFORMATION

66

FINANCE AND INSURANCE

66

REAL ESTA TE, RENT AL &amp; LEASING

67

PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, &amp; TECHNICAL SERVICES

67

ADMINISTRATIVE, SUPPORT, WASTE MANAGEMENT, &amp; REMEDIATION SERVICES

68

EDUCATIONAL SERVICES

68

HEALTH CARE AND SOCIAL ASSISTANCE

68

ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT, &amp; RECREATION

69

ACCOMMODATION &amp; FOOD SERVICES

69

OTHER SERVICES

69

~outhfielcl.

Economic Development Appendix-SO

�•

Construction
23: Construction

2361

Employment

Sales

Location Type

Residential Building Construction
1 to 4

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

Campbell-Manix Inc

Bouey's Touch

30

$20 to $50 Million

Single Location

Construction Communications

26

$5 to $1 0 Million

Single Location

Construction Specialists

20

$5 to $1 0 Million

Single Location

20

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

15

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

Employment

Sales

Location Type

7

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

2381

Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors

2383

Building Finishing Contractors

Bobson Construction
Carlo Tile &amp; Marble Co

Manufacturing
31-33: Manufacturing

3222

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing

3339

Other General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing

Business Forms Svc Inc
Adams Automation

12

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

Comau Pico

500

$100 to $500 Million

Single Location

3345

Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing

3363

Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing

Corrsys Datron Sensorsystems

•

Collins &amp; Aikman Corp

9

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

130

Over $1 Billion

Headquarter

Employment

Sales

Location Type

$5 to $1 0 Million

Branch

Wholesale Trade
42: Wholesale Trade

4233

Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers

4234

Professional and Commercial Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

4235

Metal and Mineral (except Petroleum) Merchant Wholesalers

4238

Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

4239

Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers

ABC Supply Co
Business Services
Copper &amp; Brass Sales Inc
Case Power &amp; Equipment

13
14

$5 to $1 0 Million

69

Single Location
Subsidiary

100

$50 to $100 Million

Single Location

40

$20 to $50 Million

Single Location

4

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

Employment

Sales

Location Type

ABC Warehouse

50

$1 0 to $20 Million

Branch

Blue Water Technologies

75

$20 to $50 Million

Single Location

ABC Group
Boehle Chemicals Inc

Retail Trade
44-45: Retail Trade

4431

•

Electronics and Appliance Stores

Bof Tech

8

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

BPI Information Systems

50

$1 Oto $20 Million

Single Location

Business Systems Group Inc

2

$500,000 to $1 Million

Single Location

Comprehensive Systems

10

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

Compsat Technology Inc

10
15
5

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

$5 to $1 0 Million

Single Location

$1 to $2.5 Million

Branch

Computer Mail Svc Inc
Concurrent Computer Corp

4441

Building Material and Supplies Dealers

~uthfi~Q.

Economic Development Appendix-51

�•

4451
4461
4482
4483
4511

20

$5 to $1 O Million

Single Location

9

$1 to $2.5 Million

Branch

32

$5 to $10 Million

Branch

4

$500,000 to $1 Million

Branch

4

$500,000 to $1 Million

Single Location

33

$2.5 to $5 Million

Branch

Employment

Sales

Location Type

30

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

14

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

Less Than $500 ,000

Single Location

Employment

Sales

Location Tlpe

30
30

$5 to $1 O Million
$1 Oto $20 Million

Single Location
Single Location

10

$2.5 to $5 Million

Branch

5 to 9

$500 ,000 to $1 Million

Branch

Employment

Sales

Location Type

5 to 9

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

5 to 9
26
5 to 9
55
12

$500 ,000 to $1 Million
$5 to $1 O Million
$500,000 to $1 Million
$1 O to $20 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million

Branch
Single Location
Single Location
Single Location
Branch

1 to 4

$500,000 to $1 Million

Branch

20
25
15
24
15
6
30

$5 to $1 O Million
$5 to $1 O Million
$2.5 to $5 Million
$5 to $10 Million
$2.5 to $5 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
$5 to $1 O Million

Constellation Newenergy Inc
Grocery Stores
?-Eleven
Health and Personal Care Stores
Cardinal Health
Shoe Stores
City Slicker Shoes
Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Conti Giorgio Jewelers Inc
Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores
Champs Sports

Transportation and Warehousing
48-49: Transportation and Warehousing

4842
4853
4855

Specialized Freight Trucking
C-Mack lnvotronics Inc
Taxi and Limousine Service
Aadvance Tickets &amp; Tours
Charter Bus Industry
Citizens Car Svc

Information
51: Information

•

5151

5173
5191

Radio and Television Broadcasting
CBS Radio
Christian Television Network
Telecommunications Resellers
Broadwing Communications
Other Information Services
ACS Healthcare Solutions

Finance and Insurance
52: Finance and Insurance

5221
5222

5223
5239

•

5241

Depository Credit Intermediation
Central Corp Credit Union
Nondepository Credit Intermediation
Ace Mortgage Funding
BNC-Detroit
C &amp; B Mortgage Corp
Capital Mortgage
Capmark Finance
Activities Related to Credit Intermediation
Advance America Cash Advance
Other Financial Investment Activities
Advance Capital Management Inc
Business Depot
Capital Investment Group LLC
Capital Partners LLC
Center For Financial Planning
Comprehensive Planning Group
Consolidated Financial Corp
Insurance Carriers
Capital Title Ins Agency Inc

~ou!b[!_
. elg_
,,

30

Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single

Location
Location
Location
Location
Location
Location
Location

Subsidiary

Economic Development Appendlx-52

�•

5242

Agencies, Brokerages, and Other Insurance Related Activities
40
Acordia
34
Cam Administrative Svc
33
Citizens Insurance Co
100
Comerica Insurance Svc Inc
Consolidated Group Resources
5
18
Cornish Zack Hill &amp; Assoc Inc
65
Brown Rehabilitation

$500,000 to $1 Million
$2.5 to $5 Million
$1 Oto $20 Million

Branch
Single Location
Branch
Subsidiary
Single Location
Single Location
Single Location

Employment

Sales

Location Type

10
40
10
83
17

$1 to $2.5 Million
$5 to $1 O Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location
Branch
Branch
Headquarter
Single Location

20
15

$2.5 to $5 Million
$2.5 to $5 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
Less Than $500,000

Single Location
Single Location
Single Location
Branch

Sales

Location Type

$5 to $1 O Million
$5 to $1 O Million
$5 to $1 O Million

Real Estate, Rental &amp; Leasing
53: Real Estate, Rental &amp; Leasing

5312

5313

Offices of Real Estate Agents and Brokers
Buckcorp
C B Richard Ellis
Coldwell Banker
Colliers International
Consolidated Management Inc
Activities Related to Real Estate
Complete Appraisal Co
C B Appraisal
Centre Management Co
Co Star Group Inc

6

Professional, Scientific, &amp; Technical Services

•

54: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

5411

5412

5413

5415

•

5416

5418

Employment

Legal Services
AAAAAA Aadvance Divorce
1 to 4
Acclaim Legal Svc PLLC
10
110
Brooks &amp; Kushman
1 to 4
Brooks &amp; Kushman
Buckfire &amp; Buckfire
9
Collins Einhorn Farrell
55
13
Consolidated Legal Svc
Clear Title Agency Inc
10
Clearly Title Co
10
Corvus Inc
4
Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Clayton &amp; Mc Kervey
45
14
Correll Associates
Ceridian Employer Svc
38
Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services
Cdpa Architects
32
C T Soil &amp; Materials Engnrng
1
Construction Document Mgmt
7
Computer Systems Design and Related Services
BT Americas Inc
5
GIBER Inc
40
Computer Consultants-America
30
Computerized Facility lntgrtn
50
Calli Technic LLC Credit Corp
5 to 9
Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
AT Kearney Inc
90
Business Development Group Inc
3
GIBER Inc
100
Advertising and Related Services

~u!_l]fielcJ

Less Than $500,000
$1 to $2.5 Million
$1 Oto $20 Million
Less Than $500,000
$1 to $2.5 Million
$5 to $1 O Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
$500,000 to $1 Million

Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single

Location
Location
Location
Location
Location
Location
Location
Location
Location
Location

$5 to $1 O Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location
Single Location
Branch

$5 to $1 O Million
Less Than $500,000
$500,000 to $1 Million

Single Location
Single Location
Single Location

$500,000 to $1 Million
$20 to $50 Million
$2.5 to $5 Million
$5 to $1 O Million
$1 to $2.5 Million

Branch
Branch
Single Location
Single Location
Single Location

$20 to $50 Million
$500,000 to $1 Million
$20 to $50 Million

Branch
Single Location
Branch

Economic Development Appendix-53

�•

5419

Campbell-Ewald
Caponigro Public Relations
CBS Television Network Sales
COMPUTERTRAINING.COM
Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Bromberg &amp; Assoc
CT Svc

200
15
11
1 to 4

$20 to $50 Million
$2.5 to $5 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
Less Than $500,000

Branch
Single Location
Branch
Single Location

1 to 4
1 to 4

Less Than $500 ,000
Less Than $500 ,000

Single Location
Single Location

Administrative, Support, Waste Management, &amp; Remediation Services
56: Admin., Support, Waste Mgmt &amp; Remed Svcs

5611
5613

5614

Office Administrative Services
Advantage Consulting &amp; Educatn
Employment Services
Accountants Inc
Accountemps
About Faces Productions
Access Point Human Resources
Brokers International
Business Support Services

ccs
5615

•

5616

Action Video Inc
Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Byebyenow.Com Travel
Cadillac Travel
Investigation and Security Services
Confidential Business Resource

Employment

Sales

Location Type

12

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

7
40

$500 ,000 to $1 Million
$2.5 to $5 Million

Branch
Branch

15
22
15

$500 ,000 to $1 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million
$500 ,000 to $1 Million

Single Location
Single Location
Single Location

5 to 9
10

$500 ,000 to $1 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location
Single Location

1 to 4
40

Less Than $500 ,000
$2 .5 to $5 Million

Single Location
Single Location

12

Less Than $500,000

Single Location

Employment

Sales

Location T~pe

NA

Single Location

NA

Single
Single
Single
Single

Educational Services
61: Educational Services

6111
6114

Elementary and Secondary Schools
Bradford Academy
62
Business Schools and Computer and Management Training
Charter Schools Adm
5 to 9
Abcott Institute
15
Computer Training
25
Connect 4 Growth
4

$2.5 to $5 Million
$2.5 to $5 Million
Less Than $500 ,000

Location
Location
Location
Location

Health Care and Social Assistance
62: Health Care and Social Assistance

6211
6213

6214
6216

•

6219
6222
6241

Offices of Physicians
Consultants In Ophthalmic
Offices of Other Health Practitioners
Advanced Laser &amp; Vision Ctr
Center For Reiki Training
Outpatient Care Centers
Cardiovascular Clinical Assoc
Home Health Care Services
Abcare's Homehealth Exchange
Other Ambulatory Health Care Services
Community EMS
Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals
Advanced Counseling Svc
Individual and Family Services

~outhfield

Employment

Sales

Location Type

17

$2.5 to $5 Million

Single Location

12
4

$1 to $2.5 Million
Less Than $500,000

Single Location
Single Location

18

$5 to $1 O Million

Single Location

200

$1 O to $20 Million

Single Location

350

$20 to $50 Million

Single Location

20

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

Economic Development Appendlx-54

�•
6243
6244

Access Christian Counseling
Catholic Social Svc Of Oakland
Children's Aid Society
Children's Leukemia Fndtn-Mi
Christian Family Svc
Ciena Health Care Management
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
Cornerstone Rehab Inc
Child Day Care Services
Childtime Learning Ctr

20
13
10
14
12
30

$1 to $2.5 Million
NA
NA
NA
$500,000 to $1 Million
$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location
Branch
Single Location
Single Location
Single Location
Single Location

24

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

14

$500,000 to $1 Million

Branch

Employment

Sales

Location Type

3
50

$500,000 to $1 Million
$10 to $20 Million

Single Location
Single Location

2

Less Than $500,000
Less Than $500,000

Single Location
Single Location

Employment

Sales

Location T~pe

20

$1 to $2.5 Million

Branch

5
12
60
1Oto 19

Less Than $500,000
Less Than $500,000
$1 to $2.5 Million
Less Than $500,000

Branch
Branch
Single Location
Branch

Employment

Sales

Location T~pe

$1 to $2.5 Million

Single Location

Arts, Entertainment, &amp; Recreation
71: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation

7115

7139

Independent Artists, Writers, and Performers
Bond Films-North
Champagne Fantasy
Other Amusement and Recreation Industries
Cathedral Cultural Ctr
Char Communication

Accommodation &amp; Food Services
72: Accommodation and Food Services

•

7211
7222

Traveler Accommodation
Comfort Suites Southfield
Limited-Service Eating Places
Buffalo Wild Wings Grill &amp; Bar
Charley's Grilled Subs
Copper Canyon Brewery
Cosi

Other Services
81: Other Services (except Public Administration)

8111
8131

8139

•

Automotive Repair and Maintenance
Collision Craftmen
15
Religious Organizations
Carlyle Fielding Stewart
1 to 4
Chaldean Catholic Church-USA
6
Christian Tabernacle Church
20
Church Of The Redeemer
3
Church-Jesus Christ-Lds
2
Congregation Shema Yisrael
2
Business, Professional, Labor, Political, and Similar Organizations
Bloomfield Hills Education
5
Brotherhood Of Maintenance-Way
35

~ outhfield

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single

NA
NA

Single Location
Subsidiary

Location
Location
Location
Location
Location
Location

Economic Development Appendix-55

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010154">
                <text>Southfield_Comprehensive-Master-Plan_2009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010155">
                <text>City of Southfield Planning Department, City of Southfield, Oakland County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010156">
                <text>2009-04-13</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010157">
                <text>Comprehensive Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010158">
                <text>The Comprehensive Master Plan for the City of Southfield was prepared by the City of Southfield Planning Department with the assistance of the Project Consultant Team (Jacobs</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010159">
                <text> LSL Planning, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010160">
                <text> Donald T. Iannone &amp; Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010161">
                <text> Tetra Tech., Inc</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010162">
                <text> 5 Star Engineering, Inc.) and was approved on April 13, 2009.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010163">
                <text>Jacobs</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010164">
                <text>LSL Planning, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010165">
                <text>Donald T. Iannone &amp; Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010166">
                <text>Tetra Tech, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010167">
                <text>5 Star Engineering, Inc. (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010168">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010169">
                <text>Southfield (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010170">
                <text>Oakland County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010171">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010173">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010174">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010175">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010176">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038443">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54820" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59090">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/3e4a907e77ff62d7acac89aeb58f4bfe.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f5e17780904a0818fe3b0060e0a5bd82</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010193">
                    <text>�::;;------ -= ~

~ -

,-.itu Council Resolution
Resolutiu11f01· City Council

City Council Resolution
Resolution for City Council
December 12, 2022

RESOLUTION FOR CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 12, 2022

A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A NEW MASTER PLAN OF THE ClTY OF SOUTHFIELD TO REPLACE THE EXISTING MASTER
PLAN:

WHEREAS: The existing Comprehensive Master Plan (Plan) for the City of Southfield was adopted on June 20, 2016, by the City Council;
and,
WHEREAS: At least every five (5) years after adoption of a Plan, the Council shall review the Plan and determine whether to commence
the procedure to amend the Plan or adopt a new Plan; and,
WHEREAS: The preparation of a new Comprehensive Master Plan was required to establish goals and guidelines to facilitate the direction,
redevelopment and growth of the City of Southfield to address changing demographic and marketing conditions created by the "Great
Recession" and to reposition the City into the future; and,
WHEREAS: Sustainable communities are places that balance their economic assets, natural resources, and social priorities so that residents'
diverse needs can be met now and in the future. These communities prosper by attracting and retaining businesses and people and offering
individuals of all incomes, races, and ethnicities access to the opportunities, services, and amenities they need to thrive; and,
WHEREAS: on January 19, 2021, the City Council authorized the City Planner, on behalf of the Planning Comrn;;:,::;ion, to send the required
Notice of Intent to update the Comprehensive Master Plan in accordance with the Michigan Planning Enabling Act (Act 33 of 2008, as
amended) and to initiate the Master Plan procedure to update the Plan in accordance with Sect. 5.59 of the City Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS: Over 138 letters were mailed to registered homeowner's groups and condominium associations to encourage participation.
Further, several public meeting and workshops were held with homeowner groups, civic associations, boards &amp; commissions, public
schools, and city staff throughout the process to encourage public input; and,
-1-

■

�--

City Council Resolution
Resolulionfor City Cmmcil

WHEREAS: A social media platform, publicinput.com/sustainablesouthfield2026 website, was launched on February I, 2021, for an 8week public input period to solicit feedback on a variety of topics, which resulted in over 16,406 total responses, 1,150 total comments, and
581 total participants; and,
WHEREAS: On January 20, 202 I, and March I 6, 2022; the Planning Commission held public workshops and open houses on the
preliminary draft master plan to seek additional public comment; and,
WHEREAS: On September 6, 2022, the City Council authorized the Planning Department, on behalf of the Planning Commission
Secretary, to release the draft Sustainable Southfield 2. 0, Comprehensive Master Plan 2023-2028 for the required 63-day public review
period and the requirements of the Michigan Planning Enabling Act 33 of 2008, as amended; and,
WHEREAS: On November 2, 2022, the Oakland County Coordinating Zoning Committee (CZC) held a meeting and by a 2-0 vote,
endorsed the County staffs review finding that the City's Master Plan not inconsistent with the plan of any of the surrounding communities;
and,
WHEREAS: on November I 6, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of Article 4, Section 5.59, Comprehensive Master Plan Procedure,
Chapter 45, Zoning, of Title V, Zoning and Planning of the Code of the City of Southfield, and the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, Public
Act 33 of 2008, as amended, the Southfield Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Sustainable Southfield 2. 0,
Comprehensive Master Plan 2023-2028 and forwarded a favorable recommendation to City Council by unanimous vote; and,
WHEREAS: on December I 2, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of Article 4, Section 5.59, Comprehensive Master Plan Procedure,
Chapter 45, Zoning, of Title V, Zoning and Planning of the Code of the City of Southfield, and the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, Public
Act 33 of 2008, as amended, the Southfield City Council held a public hearing on the proposed Sustainable Southfield 2.0, Comprehensive
Master Plan 2023-2028,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED:
That Sustainable Southfield 2. 0, A Comprehensive Master Plan for Now and the Future, (MP-08), draft dated December 12, 2022, be
recommended for adoption, in accordance with Article 4, Section 5.59, Comprehensive Master Plan Procedure, Chapter 45, Zoning, of Title
V, Zoning and Planning of the Code of the City of Southfield, and the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, Public Act 33 of2008 be approved
for the reasons set forth in the City Planner's recommendation; i.e.:
I. Sustainable Southfield, as prepared by the City of Southfield Planning Department, the City of Southfield Planning Commission and
residents, has been thoroughly studied by the Planning Commission at their Planning Commission Study Meetings and Regular
Meetings.

-2-

�.. ................................ --City Council Resolution
Resolution for City Council

2. Sustainable South.field will serve to guide and coordinate City decisions on new development and redevelopment; will assist in the
review of development proposals to confirm they meet the goals and strategies of the Plan; and provide a basis for amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map.
3. Sustainable communities are places that balance their economic assets, natural resources, and social priorities so that residents'
diverse needs can be met now and in the future. These communities prosper by attracting and retaining businesses and people and
offering individuals of all incomes, races, and ethnicities access to the opportunities, services, and amenities they need to thrive.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That Resolution No. MP-08 is hereby recommended for adoption.
I, Allyson Bettis, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of Southfield, County of Oakland, State of Michigan, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was adopted by the Southfield City Council at their December 12, 2022 Regular Meeting held in the Council Chambers
of the Municipal Building, 26000 Evergreen Road, Southfield, Michigan.

12/22/2022
Dated

~
Allyson Bettis, Southfield City Clerk

-3-

•

�-

-

-

-

-

----==---====----=-~-~--==-,..::__~-

-·

-·- - - -

.

--

Ack1w1vledge111cnts
'J'ho.nk \ 'ou

Aclmowledgements
ThankYou
The Honorable Dr. Kenson J. Siver, Ed. D,
Mayor

City Council
Linnie Taylor, Council President
Michael A. Mandelbaum, Council President
Pro Tern
Nancy L.M. Banks, Councilwoman
Daniel Brightwell, Councilman
Dr. Lloyd Crews, PhD, Councilman
Myron Frasier, Councilman
Jason Hoskins, Councilman
Allyson Bettis, City Clerk
Sherikia Hawkins, Former City Clerk
(resigned 10/19/2022}
Nicole M. Humphries, Deputy City Clerk
Irv M. Lowenberg, City Treasurer

City Administration
Frederick E. Zorn, CEcD, City Administrator
John Michrina, Deputy City Administrator
Dawn King, City Attorney
Eric James Shannon, Performance &amp;
Technology Specialist

Planning Commission
Dr. Geralyn Stephens-Gunn, Ed . D, Chair
Anthony Martin, Vice Chair
Robert L. Willis, Secretary
Cynthia Bernoudy
Donald Culpepper (resigned 4/28/2022}
Ghana Adell Goodwin-Dye
Jeremy Griffis
Steven Huntington

Planning Department
Terry Croad, AICP, ASLA, Director of Planning
Souzan Hanna, Sustainability Planner
Noreen Kozlowski, Landscape Design
Coordinator (retired March 2022}
Sarah K. Mulally, AICP, Assistant City Planner
Jeff Spence, Assistant City Planner
Lisa Wojciechowski, Administrative Assistant

Prepared with the assistance of:
McKenna, www.mcka.com

-4-

Other City Departments
Chief Elvin Barron, Police Department
Mary Beall, Library
Justin Beck, Emergency Management
Terry Fields, Parks &amp; Recreation
Rochelle Freeman, Business Development
Steve Gogola, Engineering (GIS}
Rene Hinojosa, Technology Services
Michael Manion, Community Relations
Chief Johnny Menifee, Fire Department
Justin Prybylski, Assessing
Leigh Schultz, Engineering
Brandy Siedlaczek, Stormwater Management
Other Contributors
Mike Csapo, General Manager, RRRASOC
Darla Van Hoey, Southfield Historical Society

�I

Table of Contents
Page References by Chapter
City Council Resolution ..................................................................................................................................................................1
Resolution for City Council. .........................................................................................................................................................................1

Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................4
Thank You ..................................................................................................................................................................................................4

Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................................................................................5
Page References by Chapter ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Table of Figures &amp; Maps .............................................................................................................................................................. 13
Figures .....................................................................................................................................................................................................13
Maps .......................................................................................................................................................................................................14
Tables ......................................................................................................................................................................................................15

Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Planning for Southfield's Future ................................................................................................................................................................16

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 18
About the Sustainable Southfield Plan ......................................................................................................................................................18
Public Engagement Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................20
Planning Commission Kick-Off Meeting ............................................................................................................................................................... 20
Homeowner Association Meetings ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21
CCAB Visioning Session ............................................................................................................................................................................ .. .......... 21
Online Engagement ................................................................................................................................................................ .............................. 22
Tapestry of a Community Art Project .................................................................................................................................................................. 24
Participation Results ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 25
Visions .....................................................................................................................................................................................................28

Chapter 1: Background ................................................................................................................................................................ 31
Context ....................................................................................................................................................................................................31

�-

---

Table of Contents
Page References by Chapter

Location ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31
Indigenous History ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 32
City Profile ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 33
Relevant Adopted Plans ...........................................................................................................................................................................35
2022 John Grace Revitalization Plan .................................................................................................................................................................... 35
2022 Parks and Recreation Master Plan .............................................................................................................................................................. 35
2022 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) .................................................................................................................................................................. 36
2018 SODA Development and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan ..................................................................................................................... 36
2017 COSA Senior Needs Assessment ................................................................................................................................................................. 36
2016 Southfield City Centre Vision Plan .............................................................................................................................................................. 37
2016 Southfield City Centre Retail Market Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 37
2014 Valley Woods Senior Campus ..................................................................................................................................................................... 37
2012 Non-Motorized Pathway &amp; Public Transit Plan ........................................................................................................................................... 38
Population and Demographic Trends ........................................................................................................................................................40
Current Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Population Trends ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 40
Chapter 2: Key Recent Changes and Trends .................................................................................................................................. 45
Local Changes Since 2016 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 45
Zoning Innovations ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 45
Southfield Arts Commission ................................................................................................................................................................................. 46
Regional and National Trends ...................................................................................................................................................................47
Pandemic Impacts ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47
Retail Relocations ................................................................................................................................................................................................. SO
Missing Middle Housing ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 51
Remote Office Work ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 52
Hotels and Short-Term Rentals ............................................................................................................................................................................ 53
New Industrial Businesses
54
US Inflation Rate Rises
55
The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting ........................................................................................................................................................... 55
Rethinking the Public Rights-of-Way ................................................................................................................................................................... 55
Chapter 3: Healthy Living ............................................................................................................................................................. 57
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................57
Background &amp; History ...............................................................................................................................................................................57
Racial Disparities in Health ................................................................................................................................................................................... 57

-6-

•

�I

--

''11111111

--

---

---

·- - -

---

---

---

---

---

---

..

..

....

-

-

..

Tahlc of Contents
Page References hy Chapter

Current Conditions ...................................................................................................................................................................................59
Environmental Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................... 59
Individual Health .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 64
Healthy Food Access ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 64
Diversity and Inclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 65
LTU Summer Camp: Introduction to Landscape Architecture ............................................................................................................................ 65
Recent Programs and Initiatives ...............................................................................................................................................................67
Southfield Peace Poles and Walk ......................................................................................................................................................................... 67
20 Minutes of Heart Healthy Activity ................................................................................................................................................................... 67
2021 All-America City Award (AAC) Competition ................................................................................................................................................ 67
Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................................................ 68
Best Cities for Black Women ................................................................................................................................................................................ 70
AARP Designation Process ................................................................................................................................................................................... 71
Key Trends &amp; Challenges ..........................................................................................................................................................................72
Pandemic Impacts on Health ............................................................................................................................................................................... 72
Mixed Use ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 72
Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................................................................73
Strengths and Opportunities ................................................................................................................................................................................ 73
Weaknesses and Threats ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 73
Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ..............................................................................................................................................................74
Goals .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 74
Objectives and Strategies ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 74

Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character .............................................................................................................................. 76
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................76
Background &amp; History ...............................................................................................................................................................................77
History of Development ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 77
National Historic Register of Places - The Plumbrooke Estates Neighborhood .................................................................................................. 78
National Historic Register of Places - The Northland Gardens Neighborhood ................................................................................................... 78
Current Conditions ...................................................................................................................................................................................79
Housing Units ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 79
Occupancy ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 80
Home Ownership ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 82
Housing Costs ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84
Housing Types ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 86

-7-

..

�..
,.
- --

Ta hie of Con ten ts
Page References hy Chapter

Housing Unit Age ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 87
Resident Length of Stay ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 87
Current Housing Programs ........................................................................................................................................................................88
Ongoing Housing Programs ................................................................................................................................................................................. 88
Ongoing Housing-Related Programs .................................................................................................................................................................... 93
Key Trends &amp; Challenges ..........................................................................................................................................................................96
Short-Term Rentals .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 96
Age-in-Place Housing ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 96
"Missing" Middle Housing ................................................................................................................................................. .................................. 97
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Tiny Homes .............................................................................................................................................. 97
Adaptive Reuse .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 98
Expansion of Residential Offerings in Single-Family Zones .................................................................................................................................. 99
20-Minute Neighborhoods ................................................................................................................................................................................... 99
Lower Parking Requirements ............................................................................................................................................................................. 100
Supply Chain Shortages During the Pandemic ................................................................................................................................................... 100
Key Findings ...........................................................................................................................................................................................101
Strengths &amp; Opportunities ................................................................................................................................................................................. 101
Weaknesses &amp; Threats ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 104
Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ............................................................................................................................................................ 105
Goals ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 105
Objectives and Strategies ................................................................................................................................................................................... 105

Chapter 5: Economic Development ............................................................................................................................................ 107
Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................................................107
Entrepreneurial Support .........................................................................................................................................................................108
Current Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................................109
Southfield ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 109
Oakland County .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 111
Recent Programs and Initiatives ............................................................................................................................................................. 114
Programs ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 114
Pandemic Response ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 118
RRC Program ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 120
2018 SDDA Reestablishment ............................................................................................................................................................................. 121
Other Projects and Developments ..................................................................................................................................................................... 125
Key Trends &amp; Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................................ 138

-8-

�,_,..,.

, . . , . . ,... '11111 ....

,

L ...

•

Table of f'ontcnL'&gt;

Page References hy C'haptcr

Continuing Pandemic Impacts ........................................................................................................................................................................... 138
Changing Workforce Demographics .................................................................................................................................................................. 139
Key Findings ...........................................................................................................................................................................................139
Strengths and Opportunities .............................................................................................................................................................................. 140
Weaknesses and Threats ................................................................................................................................................................................... 140
Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ............................................................................................................................................................ 141
Goals .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 141
Objectives and Strategies ................................................................................................................................................................................... 141

Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land Use .................................................................................................................................... 143
lntroduction ...........................................................................................................................................................................................143
Background &amp; History ............................................................................................................................................................................. 143
Pre-1900s ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 143
1900s to Present
144
Existing Land Use ...................................................................................................................................................................................145
About .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 145
The Existing Land Use Color Code ...................................................................................................................................................................... 146
Existing Land Use Map ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 147
Takeaways on Existing Land Use ........................................................................................................................................................................ 148
Key Trends &amp; Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................................149
Limited Land ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 149
Excessive Amount of Class C Office Space ......................................................................................................................................................... 149
Key Findings ...........................................................................................................................................................................................150
Strengths and Opportunities .............................................................................................................................................................................. 150
Weaknesses and Threats ................................................................................................................................................................................... 150
Future Land Use .....................................................................................................................................................................................151
About .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 151
The Future Land Use Color Code ....................................................................................................................................................................... 152
Future Land Use Map ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 153
Future Land Use Category Descriptions ............................................................................................................................................................. 154
Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ............................................................................................................................................................ 168
Goals .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 168
Objectives and Strategies ................................................................................................................................................................................... 168

Chapter 7: Sub-Area Plans ......................................................................................................................................................... 170
lntroduction ...........................................................................................................................................................................................170

-9-

�,..

----

Table of Contents
Page References hy Chapter

Current Sub-Area Plans ...........................................................................................................................................................................172
Parks and Recreation Master Plan ..................................................................................................................................................................... 172
City Centre Development Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................... 176
Centrepolis SmartZone Action Plan ................................................................................................................................................................... 181
Mixed Use Corridor District (MUCD) ................................................................................................... ............................................................... 184
Nine Mile Corridor ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 186
Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ............................................................................................................................................................ 190
Goals .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 190
Objectives and Strategies ................................................................................................................................................................................... 190

Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................................. 193
Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................................................193
Non-Motorized and Motorized Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................. 193
Stormwater and Green Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................... 194
Drinking Water and Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................... 199
Current Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................................200
Non-Motorized and Motorized Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................. 200
Road Quality ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 203
Safe Streets for All. ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 203
SEMCOG City of Southfield Traffic Crash Data ................................................................................................................................................... 204
Vision Zero ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 209
Stormwater and Green Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................... 209
Drinking Water and Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................... 211
Public Art ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 212
Current Programs and Initiatives ............................................................................................................................................................213
Pedestrian Enhancements ................................................................................................................................................................................. 213
Proposed City Centre Lawn Improvements ....................................................................................................................................................... 220
Non-Motorized and Motorized Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................. 226
Bus Stop Priority Plan (5-Year - 2019) ................................................................................................................................................................ 233
Stormwater and Green Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................... 234
Drinking Water and Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................... 235
Key Trends &amp; Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................................237
Electric Vehicles ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 237
Autonomous Vehicles and Car Sharing .............................................................................................................................................................. 238
Autonomous Delivery ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 238

-10-

�, a1 , . , . '11111111 '11111] 1IIIJ '1111) 1IIIJ 1IIIJ 1IIIJ

IIIIJ . .

Table of Contents
Page References hy Chapter

Nature-Conscious Building ................................................................................................................................................................................. 239
COVID-19 Pandemic-Driven Recreation ............................................................................................................................................................. 239
Smart Infrastructure Monitoring ....................................................................................................................................................................... 239
Trees as a Utility ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 239
Materials Management ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 240
Key Findings ...........................................................................................................................................................................................242
What is Sustainability? ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 242
Strengths and Opportunities .............................................................................................................................................................................. 242
Weaknesses and Threats ................................................................................................................................................................................... 245
Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ............................................................................................................................................................248
Goals .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 248
Objectives and Strategies ................................................................................................................................................................................... 248
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services ..................................................................................................................................... 251
Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................................................251
City Government ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 251
City Boards and Commissions ............................................................................................................................................................................ 252
City Departments ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 252
Other Agencies and Institutions ......................................................................................................................................................................... 253
Fire Department .....................................................................................................................................................................................258
Current Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 258
Recent Programs and Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................................................ 258
Key Trends and Challenges ................................................................................................................................................................................ 259
Key Findings and Future Plans ........................................................................................................................................................................... 260
Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Division ...................................................................................................................... 261
Current Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 261
Recent Programs and Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................................................ 262
Police Department .................................................................................................................................................................................263
Current Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 263
Recent Programs and Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................................................ 264
Key Trends and Challenges ................................................................................................................................................................................ 266
Key Findings and Future Plans ........................................................................................................................................................................... 267
Southfield Human Services Department (SHSD) ...................................................................................................................................... 268
Current Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 268
Recent Programs and Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................................................ 268

-11-

•

�---

- -- ---

Ta hie of Contents
Page Rcfcn~ncl~S hy Chapter

Key Trends and Challenges ................................................................................................................................................................................ 269
Southfield Schools District ......................................................................................................................................................................270
Mission Statement ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 270
Current Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 270
Key Trends and Challenges ................................................................................................................................................................................ 272
Key Findings and Future Plans ........................................................................................................................................................................... 273
Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ............................................................................................................................................................ 274
Goals .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 274
Objectives and Strategies ................................................................................................................................................................................... 274

Chapter 10: Implementation ...................................................................................................................................................... 277
Implementation Matrix ..........................................................................................................................................................................277
Zoning Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................281
Planned Future Land Use Plan Amendments .................................................................................................................................................... 281
Zoning Code Map Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 282
Zoning Code Text Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 283
Past Zoning Changes Since 2016 Master Plan ................................................................................................................................................... 286

Appendices: Sustainable Southfield 2.0 ..................................................................................................................................... 290
Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................................................................290

Appendix A: Works Cited .......................................................................................................................................................... 291
Endnotes ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 291

-12-

�..

--c

~~ ~

Table of Figures &amp; Maps
Figures

Table of Figures &amp; Maps
Figures
Figure 1. Southfield Population from 1960 to 2020 and Future Projection ................................................................................................................ 40
Figure 2. Southfield Income Distribution (2019) .......................................................................................................................................................... 42
Figure 3. Breakdown of Taxable Value (2021-2022) .................................................................................................................................................... 43
Figure 4. Southfield Educational Attainment (2010 vs 2019) ...................................................................................................................................... 43
Figure 5. Covid Deaths per 10,000 People Over 65 Years Old in Michigan (2021) ...................................................................................................... 47
Figure 6. Covid Deaths per 10,000 People Under 65 Years Old in Michigan (2021) .................................................................................................... 47
Figure 7. Brownfield Sites in Southfield ....................................................................................................................................................................... 62
Figure 8. Southfield Residential Permits, 1995-2021 ................................................................................................................................................... 79
Figure 9. Southfield Housing Units &amp; Occupancy, 1990-2019 ..................................................................................................................................... 79
Figure 10. Regional Occupancy Rate, 1990-2019 ........................................................................................................................................................ 80
Figure 11. Regional Home Ownership Rate, 1990-2019 .............................................................................................................................................. 82
Figure 12. Southfield Median Housing Values, 1990-2019 .......................................................................................................................................... 84
Figure 13. Southfield Housing Values, 2014 vs 2019 ................................................................................................................................................... 84
Figure 14. Regional Residential Rental Share, 2014 vs 2019 ....................................................................................................................................... 85
Figure 15. Regional Gross Rent, 2019 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 85
Figure 16. Regional Rent as a Percentage of Household Income, 2019 ...................................................................................................................... 86
Figure 17. Regional Residential Housing Distribution, 2019 ........................................................................................................................................ 86
Figure 18. Year Built, Southfield Residential Structures, 2019 .................................................................................................................................... 87
Figure 19. Year Householder Moved In, pre-1989 to 2019 ....................................................... .................................................................................. 87
Figure 20. General Fund Revenues, 2021-2022 ......................................................................................................................................................... 110
Figure 21. Breakdown of Taxable Value (2021-2022) ................................................................................................................................................ 110
Figure 22. Land Use Breakdown within Centrepolis SmartZone ............................................................................................ ... .. .............................. 181
Figure 23. Historic Rainfall 2010 vs 2020 ................................................................................................................................................................... 194
Figure 24. City of Southfield Traffic Crashes, 2017-2021 ........................................................................................................................................... 204
Figure 25. Response Summary from City Staff Sustainability Survey - Question 1 ................................................................................................... 246
Figure 26. Response Summary from City Staff Sustainability Survey - Question 2 ................................................................................................... 247
Figure 27. Southfield Public Schools 2022 Statistics .................................................................................................................................................. 272

-13-

I

�---------------

Table of Figures &amp; Maps
Maps

Maps
Map 1. Southfield Location .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 31
Map 2. Southfield Parks and Nature Areas .................................................................................................................................................................. 60
Map 3. Waterways in Southfield ....................................................... :.......................................................................................................................... 63
Map 4. Sketch Map of 1870s Southfield Township ..................................................................................................................................................... 76
Map 5. Southfield Vacancy Rates, 2014-2019 ............................................................................................................................................................. 81
Map 6. Homeownership Rates by Neighborhood, 2014-2019 .................................................................................................................................... 83
Map 7. CDBG Low-Mod Eligible Areas ......................................................................................................................................................................... 90
Map 8. RUDD Sites in Southfield .................................................................................................................................................................................. 95
Map 9. Pilot Speed Bump Locations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 102
Map 10. Southfield DDA Boundary ............................................................................................................................................................................ 121
Map 11. Oakland Community College Campus Future Expansion Map .................................................................................................................... 122
Map 12. Downtown Development Authority (DDA) Buildings in 3-D Classified by Use ............................................................................................ 123
Map 13. Existing Land Use Map ................................................................................................................................................................................. 147
Map 14. Future Land Use Map .................................................................................................................................................................................. 153
Map 15. Map of Sub-Areas in Southfield ................................................................................................................................................................... 171
Map 16. Parks and Recreation Assets Map ............................................................................................................................................................... 173
Map 17. City Centre Trail Map ................................................................................................................................................................................... 177
Map 18. Centrepolis SmartZone Concept Plan .......................................................................................................................................................... 182
Map 19. MUCD-Eligible Areas in Southfield .............................................................................................................................................................. 185
Map 20. Nine Mile Corridor Plan Study Area ............................................................................................................................................................. 186
Map 21. Existing Conditions on Nine Mile Road ........................................................................................................................................................ 188
Map 22. Areas of Concern on Nine Mile Road ........................................................................................................................................................... 188
Map 23. Recommended Improvements on Nine Mile Road ..................................................................................................................................... 189
Map 24. Existing and Proposed Improvements on Nine Mile Road Between Lahser and Greenfield Roads ............................................................ 189
Map 25. New Pedestrian and Bike Pathways Since 2011 .......................................................................................................................................... 201
Map 26. Existing and Proposed Non-Motorized Transportation Plan ....................................................................................................................... 202
Map 27. 2017-2021 Fatal and Serious Crashes .......................................................................................................................................................... 206
Map 28. 2017-2021 Bicycle Crashes .......................................................................................................................................................................... 207
Map 29. 2017-2021 Pedestrian Crashes .................................................................................................................................................................... 208
Map 30. Green Infrastructure Projects ...................................................................................................................................................................... 210
Map 31. Current and Upcoming Transportation Projects ......................................................................................................................................... 228
Map 32. Priority Bus Stop Improvements .................................................................................................................................................................. 232
Map 33. School District Boundaries ........................................................................................................................................................................... 270
Map 34. Zoning Code Map Plan .......................................................................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
-14-

�-

. ,. ,. ,.
Tahlc of Figures &amp; Maps
Tables

Tables
Table 1. Public Engagement Feedback from CCAB Visioning Session .......................................................................................................................... 22
Table 2. CDBG Funds Expenditures .............................................................................................................................................................................. 89
Table 3. Responses to Nine Mile Corridor Survey "What Improvements Would Encourage You to Walk and Bike More?" ................................... 187
Table 4. Low-Impact Design Terminology ................................................. ................................................................................................................. 196
Table 5. Benefits of Green Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................................. 197
Table 6. High Frequency Intersection Crash Rankings ............................................................................................................................................... 205
Table 7. Priority Water Construction Projects ........................................................................................................................................................... 235
Table 8. EV Charging Stations .................................................................................................................................................................................... 237
Table 9. Crime Statistics, 2018-2021 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 264
Table 10. Implementation Plan Table ........................................................................................................................................................................ 273

-15-

I

�.,
Executive Summary
Planning for Southfield's Future

Executive Summary
Planning for Southfield's Future
Sustainable Southfield 2.0 is the City of Southfield's comprehensive plan for the future. Sometimes referred to as the "Master Plan," this
document is used to guide future development, programs, and policies to help make our city match residents' vision for the future. The plan
gives guidance to the City Council, departments, agencies, boards and commissions, and staff as they make decisions that impact the public with every new building, street, or program, the question is asked "Does this align with the community's vision?"

Overwhelmingly, residents' visionfor the future ofSouthfield is one
rooted in resiliency, equity, and collective supportfor one another.
Residents want a community where everyone has access to high
quality recreation, entertainment and amenities, housing, andjobs

- a city where everyone thrives.
The Sustainable Southfield 2.0 Plan asked Southfield residents about the challenges they face today and what they want to see change in the
next ten to twenty years. Over 1,000 residents participated in the creation of the Plan by providing their feedback through the public survey, at
homeowners' association meetings, and at City Council and Planning Commission meetings. After receiving this feedback, over a dozen City
departments collaborated to create the draft Plan, which was then distributed for public review. Members of the public, board and commission
officials, neighboring cities, and Oakland County all reviewed the Plan over the course of two months and returned their comments to the City,
which then shaped the final Plan. From start to finish, it took almost two years to create the final Sustainable Southfield 2.0 Plan.

Sustainable Southfield 2.0 combined the public's feedback with information about the existing conditions in the city and upcoming trends to
identify the opportunities and challenges that the community will soon face. The Plan covers a wide range of topics - from roads to housing,
from schools to workforce development, and from trees to waste management - to try to get a complete picture of the future. Overall, the Plan
directs the city toward a resilient future where the community can survive, adapt, and grow no matter the pressures we face - pandemics,
climate change, and everything else the next twenty years will bring.
In total, Sustainable Southfield 2.0 includes 113 clear objectives for the future to help make progress toward the community's goals. These
objectives can all be found in "Chapter 10: Implementation." The Plan also includes innumerable recommendations and insights that will help
guide the city forward - these are scattered throughout the document but can generally be found under the "Key Findings" section in each
chapter. Chapters 1 and 2 provide a background on Southfield today, while Chapters 3 through 9 address specific topics and Chapter 10 gathers
the entire Plan together. We hope you enjoy Sustainable Southfield 2.0!

-16-

�I

�Introduction
About the Sustainable Southfield Plan

Introduction
About the Sustainable Southfield Plan
The City of Southfield's former Master Plan, Sustainable Southfield1 a Comprehensive Plan for now and the Future1 was adopted on June 20,
2016. As required by the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, Sustainable Southfield 2.0 will serve as the update to the former Master Plan and guide
City Council with recommended policies and guidelines for the next five years (2023-2028).
The past five years since the last Master Plan was adopted, we have seen tremendous change in the way we live, work, shop and in many other
aspects of our lives. 2020 turned us upside down with the COVID-19 pandemic, natural disasters, a contentious Presidential campaign, and the
national light on systemic social injustice and inequities in America. As we learn to be more tolerant of each other and adjust our daily lives
because of the pandemic today, we must maintain a focus on the development of Southfield in the future. The Southfield community continues
to strive towards being sustainable, adaptive to changing conditions, and becoming a more welcoming, inclusive, and diverse community!

-18-

�,...

-

I
J
J
J
J

J
J
J

�~
Introduction
Public Engagement Sununary

Public Engagement Summary
The City of Southfield launched the public input phase of Sustainable Southfield 2.0 at the Planning Commission meeting held on January 20,
2021. Over the last two years, the City solicited public input through multiple means, including, but not limited to: stakeholder meetings;
Planning Commission, Arts Commission, and Southfield City Centre Board meetings; neighborhood groups, homeowner associations, and
condominium associations meetings; virtual town hall sessions; online engagement and public survey through a social media platform; and
public hearings. Additional public input was solicited via the City website and social media, E-blasts, door knockers, and on-site pop-up boards
located at City Hall and other park facilities. In total, over 1,000 people provided feedback on their vision for the future of Southfield.
Complete results of the public engagement can be found in the Appendices: Sustainable Southfield 2.0.

Planning Commission Kick-Off Meeting
The Planning Commission held a public workshop on
Wednesday, January 10, 2021, to solicit comments from
the Commission as well as the public on the issues they
thought important in developing the Master Plan for the
next 5 years. The following items were discussed:
•
•
•
•

•
•
•

Importance of getting input from the public.
Using greenspace for green infrastructure and
move toward "green" building techniques.
Pursuit of "green" initiatives and moving away
from seas of asphalt parking.
Non-traditional ways of meeting with people
to get their input. Staff noted that the city can
provide 24/7 access via public input sites on
the computer and virtual town hall meetings
with Homeowners Associations and Condo
Associations.
Use of public transit in a pandemic.
Electric buses to be put in use.
Importance of Public Art and placemaking.

-20-

�~

~

,...

,...

,...

,...

,...

"11111111}

,....

,..

,..

,..

,..

,..

--

--

~

Introduction
Public Engagement Sununa1")

Homeowner Association Meetings
A notice was sent to 138 Homeowner (HOA) and Condominium Associations registered
in Southfield inviting them to meet with Planning team members to solicit input on the
Master Plan update. On March 10 and March 24, 2021, Planning Department staff
participated in two separate virtual meetings with two local HOAs: Evergreen Trails
and Burgh Pointe. Staff provided an overview of the Master Plan Process, presented
issues and trends, encouraged participation in the Master Plan process, and answered
questions. In addition, participants were asked if they had any specific issues that they
would like the City to address.

Evergreen Trails
5 people participated in this session and questions focused on where to go to
participate in the online survey.

Burgh Pointe
12 people (all HOA Board members) participated in this session.
Questions focused on medical marihuana and why it was approved in the City. Most of
the participants didn't want marihuana facilities and asked how it could be stopped in
the community. The majority (63%) of Southfield voters approved the use of medical
marihuana in 2018 by nearly a 2:1 margin. Thus, in 2019, City Council adopted
Ordinances #1678 and #1712 regulating the use of medical marihuana. The second
most common question regarded local roads in the Berg Road/Civic Center Drive Area.
It was the consensus of participants that Berg Road needed significant repairs.
Concerns were also expressed on when it might be fixed.

CCAB Visioning Session
On January 14, 2020, the Southfield City Centre Advisory Board (CCAB) held a visioning
session. Board members each contributed at least one idea on various projects,
events, and marketing priorities for the upcoming 1-2 fiscal years. Subsequently, each
member then voted on top priorities with the following results:

-21-

1llli

�- -

Introduction
Public Engagement Summary
Table 1. Public Engagement Feedback from CCAB Visioning Session

VOTES

14

VISION

Enhance gateways

7

Capture Business Community (after 5PM and weekends)

5

Coordinate events between Parks and Rec, LTU, the Library, etc.

5

Evergreen Road Pedestrian Crosswalk

4

Building Manager Meeting Club

4

LTU Flags/Banners on Ten Mile

4

EverCentre Park

3

Eagle Scout Projects

2

Ways to Draw People to Pathways via Activities/Geocaching

2

Branding and Infrastructure

2

Food Truck Locations

2

Survey City Centre

1

Meetup.com/Walking Clubs

-----I

1
1

~ Event Marketing

Fireworks and Winter Fireworks

0

Capture Transit Traffic through Signage

0

Connecting to the North via 1-696 Bridge with Art

O

Bike Events

O

Capture Young Professionals

Online Engagement
Public participation is a key element in the formulation of a Master Plan. Busy schedules, waning interests, and the additional challenge of social
distancing and quarantine mandates resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic created hurdles regarding the collection of public comment.
However, online platforms allowed the community conversations to continue despite these challenges.
In addition to the several workshops and homeowners' meetings conducted by the Planning Department, the social media platform, Public
Input, was key in providing meaningful interaction with Southfield's residents, business community, students, and visitors. Like the previous
Master Plan update which utilized MindMixer as a similar tool, it allowed participants to contribute and interact at their leisure and at times that
fit into their busy schedules.
-22-

�~,..

, .l , .l ,. _l '1l a J ~

l

,._l

,._l

Introduction
Public En~agcmcnl Sumntat')

Question and Topic Formulation
The Planning Department created a list of 17 topics which were rolled out over an eight-week period beginning on February 1, 2021. Planning
worked with relevant City staff members to devise 3-7 questions per topic, two topics per week. A third bonus topic was added to Week 6 to
obtain input on Southfield's Beech Woods Park as it coincided with the Parks and Recreation Department's Beech Woods Park Master Plan
process. The Parks and Rec Department used results from the Beech Woods Park topic as part of their Virtual Open House presentation on May
11, 2021.
Questions were posed in the following ways, and all results were visible to the respondent after submitting their answers:
•

Multiple Options: Allowed participants to choose one (or in some cases multiple) responses from a fixed set of options.

•

Rank Multiple Options: Participants dragged and dropped topics ir. order of personal importance.

•

Matrix (Likert Scale): Respondents rated questions or topics on a 5- to 7-point scale, ranging from one extreme attitude to another and
typically including a moderate or neutral option. Typically, respondents were asked to rate the personal importance or receptiveness
relating to various topics.

•

Open-Ended Comments: Nearly every topic question had an opportunity for respondents to expand upon their answers or provide
altogether different answers than were presented. Comments could be added to prior responses and/or thumbs up or down reactions
could be made as well.

•

Interactive Map Response: Areas within the City could be displayed by pin or line by the participant to illustrate comments by location.

Helpful Tools
•

Comment Flagging: Public Input's moderation toolkit
would automatically flag expletives within comments and
send it to site moderators for review prior to posting.

•

Engagement Statistics: Periodic summaries of
engagement would be emailed to site moderators.
Optional Demographic &amp; Locational Questions: Allowed
aggregation of zip codes and other helpful Census
information and data - optional to participants.

•

•

Mailing List: Each topic gave an opportunity for
respondents to add their email to the Master Plan
updates list. Planning staff then sent notification emails
regarding new topics, changes, or updates to the process
or Master Plan informational website in general.

-23-

�Introduction
Public l~ngagemcnt Summar)

Tapestry of a Community Art Project
Internationally renowned muralist Dr. Hubert Massey was commissioned by the Southfield City Centre and Southfield Public Arts Commission to
create nine art panels, in three separate triptychs, to be located along the southbound Northwestern Highway Service Drive pathway of the City
Centre Tail, adjacent to Lawrence Technological University (LTU). Two virtual town hall meetings were held (November 2020 and March 2021) to
receive community input on the proposed mosaic mural.
Through these virtual meetings, attendees shared their thoughts and ultimately contributed to the project's final vision. Dr. Massey's philosophy
and approach to this design engaged many stakeholders and representatives of the community to ensure that the final rendering would convey
historic, cultural, and future themes of the City of Southfield. Complete results of the meetings can be found in the appendices.
The first panel pays respect to the ancestral, traditional, and
contemporary lands of the Potawatomi (Bodewadmik) People
who were one of the three tribes of Indigenous People and
recognized as the "Keepers of the Fire." The Covenanter
Church is represented in the second panel; the Covenanters
were one of the earliest religious organizations to take direct
and firm anti-slavery position. Panel three shows the farm of
Mary Thompson (who descended from founding members of
the community who were instrumental in the shaping of the
City) as well as Red Pole Park. The fourth panel illustrates the
Congregation Shaarey Zedek Synagogue, which has been
named as one of the top 10 breathtaking places of worship in
the United States. Lawrence Technological University is
represented in panels five and six through depictions of
engineering, architecture, manufacturing, bio-medical
engineering, nursing, art, and design. Panel seven shows
Southfield's many engineering, automotive, and design and
suppliers, as well as the Southfield Town Center. The diversity
of the people of Southfield is represented in the various colors
of hands in several panels as well as the City's natural features.
Panels eight and nine have yet to be completed.
The first installations included the help of many community
stakeholders and representatives on October 26 and 27, 2021.

-24-

�,.. ,.. ..,.. ..,.. ..,..

~

..,..

,_.

~

,._

,_..

,_.

'1111a

'1111a

W.

'1IIIIJ

Introduction
Public Engagement Summa1')

Participation Results
During the 8-week topic period, the Sustainable Southfield 2.0 Public Input platform generated an average of 965 responses and 68 comments
by 68 participants per topic (16,406 total responses and 1,150 total comments). It appears there were 581 unique total participants. However,
because anonymous participation was permitted (which is proven to improve participation rates and facilitate the candidness of responses), this
number may be high if a participant answered both anonymously and with an indicated identity. This is an increase in 95 participants from the
486 individuals who participated in the prior online survey during the 2016 Master Plan update. The platform garnered a total of 2,331 views
with an average of 137 views per topic.
Most participants indicated a postal code of 48076 (30%). Respondents indicating a postal code within Southfield (48076, 48075, 48033, or
48034) made up 82% of all participants. Only 22. 7% of respondents chose to provide demographic information (which corresponds to Census
data) pertaining to age. The highest percentage of respondents were in the 36-45, 56-65, and 66-75 age brackets (20% each) with a smaller rate
of participation of younger individuals as compared to the previous Master Plan update. Even fewer respondents (11.4%) chose to provide
demographic information (with categories also corresponding to Census data) pertaining to gender. Based on the data provided, the highest
percentage of respondents identified as female (64%).

Top Themes
The top themes that became apparent over the 8-week process were:
1.
2.
3.

Walkability and connectivity throughout the City (i.e., closing sidewalk gaps, sidewalk maintenance, bike paths, increased amenities such
as pedestrian lighting, etc.)
Street and road repair/maintenance
Placemaking (favoring such ideas as open air or farmers markets and adaptive reuse of historic buildings)

Other recurring comments expressed an appreciation of the Southfield Public Library (and a desire for it to have extended hours), green
education, a focus on Northland Shopping Center's history as a possible part ofthe future Northland development, and the desire for additional
golf amenities, as well as a splash pad at Beech Woods Recreation Center.
Complete results of the Public Input participation engagement period can be found in the Appendices: Sustainable Southfield 2.0.

Southfield City Centre District Survey
The Planning Department, in cooperation with the City Centre Advisory Board (CCAB), also used the Public Input platform by developing a mini
survey to determine communication preferences regarding the City Centre district. Feedback from the Southfield City Centre's residents,
corporate entities, tenants, and employees provided insight on how the City can best communicate information and promote activities within
the District.

-25-

'l llllY

�.•

,

Introduction
Public Engagement Summary

Over the 10-day response period in November 2021, the survey garnered 1,009 responses, plus 265 comments from 87 participants. The
following are highlights collected from the survey:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Monthly or weekly email notifications with an up-to-date event calendar on the CCAB website are preferred means of communication
When thinking of the Southfield City Centre, the Southfield Public library, City Hall, LTU, walking paths, and public art are key features
More restaurants/retail/entertainment options in the district (to experience after work and on weekends) are desired
After work functions are preferable for engagement as a City Centre district employee
2/3 of respondents are unsure if corporate tenants are invested enough in the City Centre's efforts
An overwhelming 77% of respondents indicated it is important or very important to engage young professionals or professionals with
young families beyond the work week
36% of respondents walk or bike around the City Centre weekly and find the major deterrents to walking and biking around the district
being mostly lack of time or long distance to destinations
Additional safe and well-lit connected pathways/walkways/bike paths coupled with additional attractions (along the pathways or as a
final destination) would encourage more non-motorized transit in the district
96% of respondents have never used the Southfield City Centre Bike Share System, primarily because they own and prefer their own
bike and because they were not aware of the system; increasing advertising and awareness would be an improvement to the system
About 1/3 of respondents anticipate working fully remotely with about 1/4 working in the office full time (S days per week). Several
other commenters noted they were working hybrid or had retired during COVID

-26-

�---

i,_

--

--.._

..,...

........

,.... ,.,..... .,... ,....

----

-- --,._

....

...-J

Introduction
Public Engagement Summar)

Survey for Parks and Recreation
An online survey about the city's future was conducted as a part of the recent Southfield Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update and yielded
relevant information for the Sustainable Southfield 2.0 Master Plan. The survey was provided electronically on the Parks and Recreation page of
the City's Website, as well as at the Open House sessions and at locations throughout the City. The City advertised the survey through the City's
webpage, the City's lnstagram, Facebook, Twitter, and Nextdoor accounts, notification to the neighborhoods and homeowners' associations,
and email blasts from the City to all the recreation participants that had current email addresses on file with the City. With over 3,800 responses,
it is estimated that just shy of 10% of the population was reached in this effort.
Community engagement efforts were led by the consulting firm OHM Advisors. An aggressive campaign was implemented not only to raise
project awareness, but also to encourage and highlight the importance of public input. Project outreach and updates were relayed to various
stakeholder groups via email and social media. Project information was also available via the City website and social media, E-blasts, door
knockers, and on-site pop-up boards located at City Hall and Beech Woods.
In addition to virtual and in-person open houses and scheduled focus groups, online surveys focusing on the overall Parks and Recreation Master
Plan, as well as Beech Woods Park specifically, were created and posted to the Public Input social media platform. Additionally, Week 6 of the
Sustainable Southfield 2.0 Public Input survey pertaining to Healthy Living also touched on noteworthy points relating to City parks and
recreational activities and programming.

-27-

�,.
Introduction
Visions

Visions
Sustainable Southfield Visions
Develop a partnership between Southfield residents and the Southfield Police Department with the
purpose of involving both parties to create solutions that address the issues that impact the local
community. Protect the community by using a customer approach to delivering services for residents
and other police officers.

2:

Families

4: Recreation

5: Entertainment

The Southfield community and police can identify, prioritize, and focus on crime prevention with both
parties actively involved and working together to achieve their desired outcome, focusing on
prevention, problem solving, and partnership. The prevention and reduction of crime is done by
creating helpful initiatives that are based on problems the community believes are affecting it. The
partnership between the community and police is vital because residents can identify problems that
need to be addressed, from which the police can focus on solutions to those problems. Through this
partnership, the police gain trust and confidence from the community and both parties are involved in
the issues that impact their shared community.
Provide events, facilities, and services that appeal to families (i.e., movies, theaters, splash pads, etc.)
and people of all ages.

Continuously look for new ways to improve schools through fresh and innovative ideas balanced with
continuity and steadiness, mixing the old with the new. By educating youth and preparing them to
become the next generation of innovators, protectors, and community stewards, school districts would
build leaders who are not just visionaries, but who know how to continually raise standards,
implement changes, and inspire changed behavior to achieve continuous success.
Provide a comprehensive recreation network with a wide range of amenities, including a variety of
sports venues and programs. Increase walkability through the development of park pathways and
trails.
Attract and retain young families, professionals, and older adults with quality restaurants,
entertainment, housing, and recreational facilities.

-28-

�.,. .,.

,.. ,. ,..

,.. ,.

,__
lntr&lt;,duction
Vi~ions

Sustainable Southfield Visions
6: Housing

Offer a variety of housing, mixed use, higher density, accessory dwelling units, housing for older adults,
etc. to meet the needs of everyone within their budget.

7: Aging in Place

Provide support services, events, housing, etc., to support older adults with an emphasis on allowing
them to age in place. Increase daily physical activity opportunities at the individual, social, and
organizational levels.

8: Sustainability

Develop an integrated, resilient planning approach to help Southfield address climate change, climate
adaptation, and equity through sustainability.

9: Equity

Ensure that all people have full and equal access to opportunities that enable them to lead healthy
lives.

-29-

�Chapter 1: Background
Art Title: Tapestry of a Community
by Dr. Hubert Massey

�Chapter l: Background
Context

Chapter 1: Background
Context
Location
The City of Southfield is located along the southern boundary of
Oakland County, situated in southwest Michigan. Southfield shares a
southern border with the City of Detroit and is direct neighbors with
several smaller municipalities, including Oak Park, Royal Oak,
Berkley, Redford Township, Beverly Hills, Franklin, Bingham Farms,
and Farmington Hills. Southfield also contains Lathrup Village, an
independent city, completely within its borders. Southfield covers
approximately 26 square miles, and the main branch of the River
Rouge runs through Southfield, although it accounts for very little
net area. The city is bounded to the south by Eight Mile Road,
western by Inkster Road, and east by Greenfield Road . Southfield's
northern border does not follow a single road but lies approximately
along Thirteen Mile Road.

Map 1. Southfield location
-31-

�-·

Chapter

1:

Background
Context

Indigenous History
The modern City of Southfield is located on the ancestral, traditional, and
contemporary lands of the Potawatomi (Bodewadmik). The incorporated City
of Southfield resides on land ceded in the 1827 Treaty of St. Joseph (see the
highlight box to the right) which created the reservations of Tonquish (in
Sections 30 and 31 of the township) and Seginsiwin (in Sections 8 and 9 of the
township). It is also believed that there was probably an Indian Burial Ground
in Section 11 of today's city.
The Potawatomi are one of three tribes of Indigenous People who inhabited
Michigan after the glaciers receded. The Potawatomi, the Odawa, and the
Ojibwa were known as the "Three Fires Confederacy." The Ojibwa were the
"Older brother," Keepers of the Faith or Tradition, the Odawa were the
"Middle brother," Keepers of Trade, and the Potawatomi were addressed as
the "Younger brother" and were recognized as the Keepers of the Fire.
European explorers first encountered the three tribes in the 1600s, when the
Potawatomi called themselves Neshnabek, meaning "original people." 1
According to Professor Richard Stamps, there are as many as 40 sites of
collections of arrowheads and stone tools from the Archaic, Woodland, and
Historic Period in what later became Southfield Township.
The City of Southfield has a strong history of recognizing cultural diversity,
which the City celebrates and honors. On July 30, 2018, the Southfield City
Council renamed the federally recognized holiday "Columbus Day" (est. 1937)
to "Indigenous Peoples Day" to be celebrated on the second Monday of
October. It is the City's intent that Indigenous People's Day shall be used to
reflect upon the ongoing struggles of Indigenous people on this land, and to
celebrate the thriving culture and value that Indigenous nations add to our
City, State, and Nation.
About land acknowledgements: Acknowledgment is a simple, powerful

way of showing respect and a step toward correcting the stories and
practices that erase Indigenous people's history and culture and toward
inviting and honoring the truth. For more information visit

, ,ttP~ //usJdC.uS/,1dlVC )nd
-32-

UNITED STATES POTAWATAMIE
TREATY

�~
lrnpter

City Profile
Southfield Township, originally known as Ossewa Township, came into
existence on July 12, 1830. The Town Hall became City Hall when
Southfield was incorporated in April 1958. City officials moved to the
present City Hall in 1964, which was built on land purchased at half
market value from Mary Thompson, a town founder.
Today, Southfield is a community that is as unique and diverse as its
residents. One of the City's brand key messages is "A Place for Everyone."
It is this belief that our racial and religious diversity is a strength that
weaves together the cultural fabric of our community. There truly is "A
Place for Everyone" in the City of Southfield where all people, from
virtually all walks of life, live peacefully together within our borders.
Southfield is an international city bustling with people from a rich array of
cultural, racial, ethnic, and religious backgrounds, including large African
American, Armenian, Chaldean, Jewish, and Russian populations. "The
community's diversity is one of the many reasons my family moved to
Southfield," says attorney Veronica Leonard, Southfield's Total Living
Commission Chair. "My family and I really enjoy the melting pot effect in
Southfield of having people of so many nationalities living happily
together. You just don't see that in every community."
The City of Southfield truly offers a complete living community, featuring a
nationally recognized public-school system, 10 colleges and universities,
almost 800 acres of park land, a beautiful public 9-hole executive golf
course and numerous other recreational activities, including urban
shared-use pathways. Southfield is a progressive and modern city of
beautiful homes and golden skyscrapers comprised of more than 77,000
engaged residents. Centrally located in the Detroit metro area, Southfield
is not only the Center of It All™ geographically, but also the business
center of southeast Michigan as well. Southfield's 27 million square feet of
office space and 10,000 plus businesses, including more than 100
"Fortune 500" companies, make it home to a daytime population nearing

-33-

J:

--

Background
Conte-xt

�---

Chapter

1:

Background
Context

175,000 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic). Few other metropolitan areas can boast such a beautiful skyline, replete with high-rises located just minutes
away from quaint, tree-lined neighborhoods.
The City of Southfield's elected officials and administration always keep residents and their needs at the center of the decision-making process
with a keen focus on every tax dollar spent. City officials are continually looking for new ways to improve the city's overall quality of life while
also refining and enhancing existing community programs and services. The City of Southfield makes great effort to not only maintain clear and
open lines of communication, but also to continually improve those channels. As Southfield's demographics have changed, so too has the City's
approach to reaching and engaging the community. The City has grown and adapted to meet the new and ever-changing needs of the
community through its boards and commissions, public meetings and "town halls," newly relaunched municipal website, and the City's evergrowing social media outreach. City leaders actively engage residents to gather input that is used to help shape policies and programs that
reflect the community's vision and requisites. In response to those needs, the City of Southfield has increasingly focused on creating more
reflective and inclusive community programming, in addition to a more walkable City Centre business district. Since 2016, more than two dozen
new public art pieces have been installed throughout the City.

-34-

�haptcr 1: Bad&lt;g1·ound
RclcYant Adopted Plarn

Relevant Adopted Plans
The following section provides summaries of all the different existing, adopted plans that influenced the creation of the Sustainable Southfield
Master Plan. Sub-area plans are explained in detail under Chapter 7: Sub-Area Plans.

2022 John Grace Revitalization Plan
The former John Grace School and Community Center, located at 2130 Indian Street, is
being considered for adaptive re-use for affordable senior housing. The City, in
cooperation with the Planning Department and Planning Commission, is looking at the
feasibility of renovating the historic building, reconfiguring the site, and making public
improvements near the subject property. In early 2022, the City began considering
rezoning the property as a Residential Unit Development District (RUDD) . The RUDD
option amendment to the zoning ordinance was adopted on May 30, 2019, with the aim
to spur innovative redevelopment of historic buildings; the John Grace site is one of
several that had been designated as possible future RUDD sites within the city. John Grace I ■ John Gral'l' Rl'\it 11 li:.r11tion PIRn
Arms, a multifamily development proposal by Lockwood Companies, is now in the
preliminary review process and, if approved, would provide 60 affordable housing units in
addition to a 0.5-1.0-acre public park and an indoor community space. Seen as a transition from the
single-family neighborhoods to the north into the more intensely developed areas along Eight Mile Road
and Grand River Avenue to the south, the improvements are likely to activate continued investment from
the City, businesses, and neighbors.

2022 Parks and Recreation Master Plan

Parks and Recreation

Master Plan

,.t =··

Adopted in January of 2022, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan serves as the guide for all open space
and recreation facility management in Southfield . The city contains over 780 acres of parkland, special
events, and recreational programming, and miles of nature and fitness trails. The Parks and Recreation
Master Plan was created to determine the needs and opportunities that exist within the City in
consideration of how many people will use recreational amenities, which programs they will participate
in, and what type of facilities they want and need. By understanding the existing conditions and past
trends, the City can appropriate/anticipate and plan for the community and its future. As a part of the
plan, each park was categorized and ranked based on its accessibility to determine areas for
improvements. Additionally, school facilities, private facilities, and parks in nearby cities were evaluated

-35-

-

�Chapter 1: Background
Relevant Adopted Plans

as a part of the effort. These analyses, combined with a review of recreation facilities, programming and
amenities, gave the city a clear picture of where parks and rec is headed in the future .

2022 Capital Improvement Plan {CIP)
Adopted in April of 2022, the Southfield Capital Improvement Plan (CIP} is the comprehensive document
which outlines where and when the city is going to spend money on infrastructure improvements over
the next six years. The plan covers all improvements that are major non-recurring expenditures for
physical facilities, or recurring expenditures for physical items which cost over $5,000, such as
equipment and vehicles or the installation of sewer and water mains. The 2022-23 CIP contains
approximately $69,577,310 million in capital projects for Facilities Maintenance, Water &amp; Sewer, and
Streets &amp; Highways alone. An additional $14,434,906 million comes from Parks &amp; Recreation, Storm
Water Management &amp; Flood Plains, Pedestrian Enhancements,
Data Management, and Equipment, for a grand total of
$84,012,216 for the 2022-23 Fiscal Year Capital Expenditures.

rr•pa,9d b, w.. c,1, o1 So..v-,,
rlarulonO D-im.nt
.... 11 , m,

2u17 Restated

Development
Plan and Tax
Incremt•nl
Financing Plan

2018 SODA Development and Tax Increment
Financing {TIF) Plan
Adopted in January of 2018, the Southfield Downtown Development Authority's (SODA) Downtown and
Tax Increment Financing (TIF} Plan is the guide for expenditures made by the DOA over the next 26
years. The SODA is a government agency that captures tax revenue from certain areas of the city (mostly
the southeast corner of the city by Northland Center) and spends that money on projects that have a
direct economic benefit for the city- street beautification, parking improvements, vacant site
redevelopment, assistance for interested redevelopers, and more. The SDDA's planned redevelopment
of key vacant sites, such as Northland, is particularly important for the Economic development
component of Sustainable Southfield.

2017 COSA Senior Needs Assessment
In 2016, the Southfield Commission on Senior Adults (COSA} launched a Senior Needs Assessment as a part of the City's push to obtain AARP's
"Age-Friendly City" designation. The assessment found that the three main challenges facing older adults were lack of awareness of available
support programs, inadequate public transportation, and lack of affordable housing options. COSA then incorporated these findings into its

-36-

�Chapter

1:

Background

Relevant Adopted Plans

application, and the city was awarded the Age-Friendly City designation in 2017.
Although the designation expires in 2022, the issues contained within the initial
evaluation remain relevant to Southfield today, and COSA is working to renew
the city's status this upcoming year.

2016 Southfield City Centre Vision Plan
Adopted in November of 2016, the Southfield City Centre Vision Plan is the guide
for creating a pedestrian-friendly mixed-use development in the site at the heart
of the Southfield City Centre district to help attract and retain professionals, to
create and maintain a "sense of place," and to spur economic development. The
City Centre site is located directly across Evergreen Road from the municipal
campus, just south of the Upper Evergreen neighborhood. The plan is intended
to set the vision for the development of the site by identifying market potential,
providing a set of design guidelines and imperatives for development, and
offering an illustrative vision of the site's full potential.

SOUTHFIELD CITY CENTRE VISION
&amp; REDEVELOPMENT Pl.4N

.,.,._._..e,rycenni
Retail Mar1&lt;e1 Analysis

2016 Southfield City Centre Retail Market Analysis
Adopted in April of 2016, the Southfield City Centre Retail Market Analysis works
in tandem with the City Centre Vision Plan. The Retail Market Analysis details
which business types would be appropriate for the site and how capable the city
would be of supporting such businesses-long term. Additionally, the analysis
evaluates the impacts that different businesses would have on the local
economy as a whole. This study finds that the proposed Southfield City Centre
can support up to 183,700 square feet of additional retail and restaurant
development, generating as much as $52.7 million in new sales. By 2021, a small
but steady growth in the residential base and increases in household income will
grow the trade area's retail demand, potentially reaching $58.5 million in
consumer expenditure.

ValleYWi

2014 Valley Woods Senior Campus
Adopted in May of 2015, the Valley Woods Senior Campus Plan is a
neighborhood plan that lays out the plan for a senior-friendly neighborhood near
the intersection of Civic Center Drive and Telegraph Road. Since 1988, the City of
-37-

So1ttl1licl&lt;I.

ADO

�Chapter l: Background
Rcle\'ant Adopted Plans

Southfield and the Southfield Nonprofit Housing Corporation have been buying parcels of land to the north of Civic Center Drive and west of
Berg Road (immediately north of the McDonnell Tower and River Park Place Apartment complexes) for the purpose of establishing such a senior
campus. The Valley Woods Plan includes several senior apartment buildings, a park, nature trails, and a wetland restoration project. Much of the
Plan has now been successfully implemented, and it continues to be an important basis for informing Sustainable Southfield.

2012 Non-Motorized Pathway &amp; Public Transit Plan
Adopted in March of 2012, the Southfield Non-Motorized Pathway &amp; Public Transit Plan describes the plan for a "multi-modal" transportation
system (vehicles, pedestrian, bicyclist, and public transit) that provides access for those citizens unable or unwilling to drive, such as older adults,
children, and those who do not have access to a car. One goal of the plan is to provide a high-quality system that provides safe and efficient
access to all areas of the community for a wide variety of users, such as drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit riders. Since 2012, a
large portion of the plan has been implemented, but it remains an important guide for the public infrastructure portion of Sustainable
Southfield.

,.
so1.11~

~

,,cE"'1RE
91

ed ,no 1tans1t sub-~tea
,
soutnfte\d cit-I cenu• 1"1on-1Ao\Ot\1

"'

. ,' '!

--

.,

•

4tti'

-------

I
Non-Motorized Pathway
&amp; Public Transit Plan

Adopted March 19, 20U
City ot Southfield. Mic:h111an

-38-

��Chapter 1: Background
Population and Demographic Trends

Population and Demographic Trends
Current Conditions
Understanding demographic changes over time helps provide a better picture of what the future may hold for a community. Analyzing past and
present demographic, social, and economic data may help Southfield anticipate future land use patterns and community needs. This Master Plan
uses a wide range of community data as a foundation to provide guidance for both land use and development decisions. The following chapters
use the most current information available, including the 2020 US Census of Population and Housing, 2019 Population Estimates, the SEMCOG
2045 Regional Development Forecast, and other local and regional information (from SEMCOG) to reflect current conditions and trends more
accurately.

Population Trends
In 1950, Southfield Township had approximately 18,500 residents and comprised 36 square miles, containing land that is now the Cities of
Southfield and Lathrup Village and the Villages of Bingham Farms, Franklin, and Beverly Hills. Between 1950 and 1960, the cities and villages in
the township began incorporating during a period of rapid growth. In 1958, at the time of Southfield's incorporation, the City had approximately
29,000 residents.
As a first ring suburb of Detroit, the City of Southfield
experienced major growth during the auto-dominated
1960's and, by 1970, the City had grown to nearly
70,000. Southfield's population reached more than
75,000 by 1980, but growth was already slowing
considerably. As of July 2021, the City of Southfield had
an estimated 76,810 residents, according to the
Southeastern Michigan Council of Governments
(SEMCOG). This figure is up 7% from the population
reported by the US Census Bureau for the year 2010
(71,739). The recently released 2045 Forecast for
Southeast Michigan by SEMCOG predicts that the
population will increase only slightly over the next 25
years. SEMCOG forecasts that the population will
increase to approximately 83,816 by 2045, an overall
increase of 9.1% from the 2021 population estimate . 2

Figure 1. Southfield Population from 1960 to 2020 and Future Projection
C

.2

80.000
60 .000
0000
0000

0-----...----.---------■ Oecc11ni.1C
Source : SEMCOG

-40-

i■ SEMCOG 204S f"OltUSI

�Chapter 1: Hackgrmmd
Population and Demographic Trends

Households
The US Census Bureau defines a household as all persons inhabiting a housing unit. Households can include one or more families or one or more
unrelated persons who share living quarters. The greatest change to average household size occurred between 1970 and 1980. Southfield's
number of households is forecasted to remain mostly unchanged which is consistent with its population pattern. Between 2020 and 2045, the
average household size is forecasted to increase from 2.28 to 2.30 persons per household. 3

Age
The age distribution of the City's residents has been slowly
changing. However, it's the aging of the baby-boomer generation
that most significantly impacts the community's age distribution
over time. This effect is seen by sharp increases in the 65+ age
bracket as the baby boomer generation advances in age .
However, the 25-64 population remains stable, indicating a
possible influx in residents maintaining the age group of residents
within the working class.
Southfield already has a higher proportion of residents in the 65+
age group than Oakland County, metro Detroit (Macomb,
Oakland, and Wayne Counties), and the State of Michigan. This
number will only increase with time, and this must be noted as
this age bracket generally requires costly public services. As this
growth occurs, the City must adapt to meet their changing needs
by exploring age-friendly housing options, increased recreational
programs for older adults, improved public transportation
options, and improvements in walkability to allow residents to
age in place .

""

ins of

~~s

In April 2015, the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP)
launched their Livability Index, a new online tool designed to help
communities' better serve the nation's aging population. To
create the index, the AARP Public Policy Institute surveyed 4,500
Americans 50 and older to determine the aspects of community

and Community

---41-

Support$

Rupect and
Sod~l lnchn1on

lfAllNMOllf

e .U .•IRIIAi' ..... ~10----,.c.Mat:tUlfil'lflllllMIIC1

-....

-

�rChapter 1: Background
Population and Demographic Trends

most important to them. AARP then developed several categories around those results: housing, neighborhood, transportation, environment,
health, engagement, and opportunity. 4
The Livability Index score rates the overall livability of a selected neighborhood, city, county, or state on a scale from Oto 100. It is based on the
average score of seven livability categories-housing, neighborhood, transportation, environment, health, engagement, and opportunity-which
also range from Oto 100. AARP scores communities by comparing them to one another, so the average community gets a score of 50, while
above-average communities score higher and below-average communities score lower.
In 2015, Southfield's score was 49, just below the median. In 2018, Southfield's score rose to 53, above the national average, however, it has
decreased slightly to 49 in 2022.
Race

In 2000, Southfield had a racial mix consisting of over½ of the total population
being Black (54.3%), just less than ½ being white {38.9%), and the remainder being
made up of other ethnicities (6.8%). Between 2000 and 2010, the number of white
residents declined by 12,555 or 41%, according to the US Census Bureau. During the
same period, the black population increased by about 8,000. This shift, which was a
continuation of the trend from the 1990 Census, has resulted in the City's once
minority black population now comprising nearly 70% of all Southfield residents.
This trend is consistent with other communities across the Detroit metro area, as
the suburbs of Detroit gained nearly twice as many black residents between 1990
and 2010 than any other racial or ethnic group. Between 2010 and 2019, there has
been a slight decrease in white residents (6.7%), but all other numbers remain
relatively consistent. Southfield continues to have one of the highest concentrations
of black residents in the metro area. 5

Figure 2. Southfield Income Distribution {2019}

$200 ,000 or more
$150 000 to $199,999
$125,000 to S149 999
$100 ,000 to S124 999
$75 000 to $99 999
$60 000 to $74 999
$50 000 to $59,999
$45 .000 to $49,999
$40,000 to $44 999
$35,000 to $39,999

Income

$30 000 to $34 999
$25 000 to $29 999

Southfield's residents are primarily middle-class. In constant dollars, the median
household income increased only slightly by approximately 6% over the past two
decades to $55,705. Southfield has a lower median household income than the
Detroit metro area (12% lower), a trend that began in 2000 and has continued.
Incomes in Southfield are approximately 30.1% lower than in Oakland County
($79,698). However, Oakland County ranks the highest in median household income
statewide, followed closely by Livingston County.

$20 000 to $24,999
$15,000 to $19 999
$10,000 to $14,999
Less than 5 10,000

~000

3,000

2.000

Source: SEMCOG, 2019

-42-

1 000

0

�Chapter 1: Background
Population and Demographic Trends

Poverty has decreased in Southfield during the past five years, as well as in
Oakland County, but increased for Metro Detroit as a whole. 6

Figure 3. Breakdown of Taxable Value {2021-2022)

Tax Base
Based on the adopted 2021-2022 City of Southfield Municipal Budget
Executive Summary, property taxes represent 66% of General Fund
Revenues. Projected taxable value, excluding capture districts (Local
Development Finance Authority aka LDFA, DOA, SmartZone, Brownfield
Redevelopment Authority, and Renaissance Zone), is $2,606,715,860,
which represents a 1.36% increase over the 2020-21 projection.
The taxable value of Commercial, Residential, Personal, and Industrial
properties contributes to the City's revenue from property taxes. As seen in
Figure 4, the taxable value of Commercial properties results in generating
the most revenue to the City at 45% with Residential properties generating
the second most at 41%.

Industrial,
$54,292,
1%

Persona-.:l'~ - - $651,508,
12%

Commercial,
$2,443,156,
45%

Residential,
$2,280,279,
42%

Source: Southfield Assessors Department

Figure 4. Southfield Educational Attainment {2010 vs 2019}

Education
35

A snapshot of the educational characteristics of a community is important
because education levels are strongly related to economic success,
particularly as Michigan and metropolitan Detroit transition from a
manufacturing economy to one that is largely knowledge-based.
Concentrations of educated residents attract and sustain jobs and tend to
provide governments with a higher tax base.
Based on 2019 data, the educational attainment of Southfield's adults is
slightly higher than that of the metro area but notably lower than Oakland
County, as seen in Figure 4. 92% of Southfield adults 25 years old or older
have at least a high school diploma, compared to 98% in the County and
92% in the metro area. 55% of Southfield residents have a college degree,
compared to 41% in the metro area and 55% in the County. 7
If Southfield can be proactive in enticing students with college degrees to
remain in the City after graduation, it will see its share of high school- and
college-educated residents rise, ultimately helping to preserve and
strengthen its healthy economy.
-43-

30

25

20

15

.'\r.

~'1~

'N-

~~'\,

■ AC.S 2010

Source: SEMCOG, 2010, 2019

~

■ ACS2O19

��Chapter

2:

Key Recent Changes and Trends
Local Changes Since 2016

Chapter 2: Key Recent Changes and Trends
Local Changes Since

2016

Zoning Innovations

PLACEMAKING AND THE ART OF MIXED USE
BY SHAMIM AHMADZADEGAN

Southfield has a history of innovation in zoning, especially for suburban communities
located in South-East Michigan. When many other suburban communities where
limiting heights of buildings to 2 or 3 stories, Southfield allowed unlimited height
(provided yard requirements are satisfied) in the City Centre and created the
forerunner to mixed-use zoning in its RC, Regional Center, RS, Regional Shopping, and
ERO, Educational Research-Office, districts. Over the past 5 years, the City has
implemented even more zoning innovations, summarized below.

"In my work as a mixed-use practitioner, I'm constantly
aware of the importance of the public realm in making
great cities that are layered with experience. I'm talking
about the plazas, courtyards, passageways, sidewalks,
and parks - the in-between spaces that serve as the
connective fabric weaving together the threads of a city
and its people. To me, these interstitial spaces are where
a city's soul lives and where social interactions reside.

RUDD

During research for the Gensler Experience lndex 5M, we
discovered that a sense of place adds significantly to a
great experience. When we work with clients on new
developments, we focus on characteristics that are
rooted to the place they're in. We've found that this adds
authenticity and allows visitors to feel connected to
where they are. Ultimately, mixed-use projects are all
about porosity and connectivity, from the connection to
public transportation, to different parts of the city, to all
of the components in between.

In May 2019, the City added the RUDD, Residential Unit Development District, to
encourage and allow adaptive reuse of former school sites and grounds. The RUDD is
intended to encourage the adaptive reuse and preservation of former school buildings
and sites, foster green infrastructure and natural resource conservation, encourage
innovation in land use planning, and provide enhanced housing, employment, traffic
circulation and recreational opportunities for the residents of Southfield.

ODD
In April 2013, the City added the ODD, Overlay Development District (Ordinance No.
1603). The purpose of the ODD is to encourage development of those parcels of land
which, because of their size, location along higher density adjoining uses, or their
unique environmental features, require a more flexible development scheme . The
ODD fosters creative development design, or preserve desirable natural features,
significant historical landmarks and architectural features. The ODD modifies the

Gensler's research examines this overlooked aspect of
city-making. We identified six elements - nature,
community, human scale, culture, connectivity, and art that can be blended into developments to create places
with spirit and energy. When applied effectively, these
elements can unlock project potential, generate higher
revenues, and create more soulful spaces and, ultimately,
more soulful cities."
(Source: Gensler Research, Dialogue Issue 32, Dec 2021).

-45-

�Chapter :.e: Key Recent Changes and Trends
Local Changes Since 2016

traditional form of zoning and permits variety in design, site configuration, setbacks, layout, use, and encourages
efficiency in use of land and natural resources, while ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses.
In return for greater flexibility in site design requirements, ODD projects are expected to deliver exceptional quality
community designs that provide above-average pedestrian amenities, incorporate creative design in the layout of
buildings, and focus on pedestrian space and circulation, incorporate public art, assure compatibility with surrounding
land uses and neighborhood character, and provide greater efficiency in the layout and provision of roads, utilities, and
other infrastructure.
Finally, ODD projects authorized under the ordinance shall provide a better and more desirable living and physical
environment than what would be possible under the zoning regulations that apply to the development or traditional
zoning district, while implementing the policies and objectives of the Master Plan. The ODD has been updated in 2015
(Ordinance No. 1640), 2017 (Ordinance No. 1676 and 1678), and 2021 (Ordinance No. 1738).

Green Infrastructure Ordinance
In June of 2017, the Southfield City Council approved a series of amendments to city Zoning that added provisions for
green infrastructure. The text amendments are spread across different articles of the Zoning Ordinance and address
regulations for green infrastructure and low impact development methods, as well as revise storm water management,
landscape and parking standards, conditions, and general requirements. The amendments are designed to promote the
use of green infrastructure and ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the community.

Southfield Arts Commission
The City established the Southfield Arts Commission (Ordinance No. 1630) in November 2014 to promote the public
welfare and to serve the public interest, convenience, and enjoyment through the promotion of the arts in the City of
Southfield . A secondary benefit was to have art function as part of placemaking to help attract and retain professionals.
In April 2016, Southfield created the Public Art requirement to encourage the placement of art in the public view as part
of new developments and major redevelopments. The Public Arts Commission recognizes that public art creates a
unique sense of place and distinction, enjoyment, and pride for all citizens, businesses, and visitors. The goal of the
Public Arts Commission is to create a stimulating environment that reflects and enhances the City's heritage, diversity
and character through public artworks, integrated architecture, infrastructure, and landscape of Southfield.

-46-

�haph.'r 2: Key Recent Changes and Trends
Regional and National Trends

Regional and National Trends
Pandemic Impacts
Figure 5. Covid Deaths per 10,000 People Over 65 Years Old
in Michigan {2021)

Participation Technology
In the earliest days of the pandemic when the U.S. was in full lockdown,
many placemaking organizations like parks groups, libraries, and arts
organizations turned to digital tools to continue reaching their
communities. Webinars, virtual tours, downloadable scavenger hunts, and
online public meetings exploded in popularity. There is a new focus on
ensuring equity in new mobility technologies. We need to examine how
governments can use better technology frameworks and public-private
partnerships to put communities in the driver seat.
However, digital technologies also open communities to more risk - risk of
biased feedback, risk of ransomware attacks, risk of data loss, and risk of
unintentional exclusion of segments of the population. As the City moves
forward with digital engagement, all of these possibilities must be
considered and mitigated in advance.
Health Equity and Access

8

7
6

5
4
Bl

3

■ VVh

2
1

0

No. of Comorbldities

Sex
Source : Parpia, Alyssa S., (2021, February 26), Racial disparities in COVID-19
mortality across Michigan, United States

Figure 6. Covid Deaths per 10,000 People Under 65 Years Old
in Michigan {2021)

By June 2020, State of Michigan data showed that 31% of COVID-19 cases
and 40% of COVID-19 deaths were among African Americans, even though
this group represents about 14% of the state's population. By December
2020, the percentage of COVID-19 deaths among African Americans
dropped to 26%. However, African Americans still had the highest
mortality rate for COVID-19 at 221 deaths per 100,000, compared to white
Michiganders, which had the second highest rate of 112 deaths per
100,000.8 By 2021, it became apparent that the pandemic was continuing
to have a disproportionate impact on Black communities, as shown in
Figure 5 and Figure 6. As a majority Black city, these impacts have hit
particularly close to home for Southfield residents.

350

300
250
200
150
100

50
0
u11olel' No. of Comorbidities
Femal

Sex

Source : Parpia, Alyssa S., (2021, February 26), Racial disparities in COVID -19
mortalitv across Michigan . United States

-47-

�Chapter 2: Key Recent Changes and Trends
Regional and National Trends

Street Adaptation
One response to the lack of sufficient and safe public space in many cities during the pandemic was to open up streets to uses other than moving
and storing cars. From open streets to street dining to more innovative approaches like Oakland's "Essential Places" program, these experiments
shattered many long-standing assumptions about how street space must be
allocated.
One big question over a year later is whether these lighter, quicker, cheaper
experiments have any staying power. The Dutch mobility firm Mobycon,
introduced their "Mobility Doughnut" tool (shown right) during a breakout
session at Walk/Bike/Places conference in 2021. Their tool is inspired by the
economist Kate Raworth's idea of the "Doughnut Economy," which argues
that rather than aiming for maximum economic growth, government policy
should strive for an economy that hits a sweet spot between meeting the
basic needs of every person and living within our ecological ceiling, avoiding
activities that harm the planet. Likewise, the Mobility Doughnut aims to
measure mobility in a way that prioritizes offering more ways to move to
people who have the fewest options and promoting transportation modes
that are environmentally friendly. 9
Justice, Advocacy, and Policy
The pandemic magnified many of the inequities of American cities, from
access to high-quality green space to traffic violence to unemployment to
housing precarity, while other injustices like police violence continued
almost unabated. Meanwhile, the "solutions" that cities implemented in response to the pandemic often followed these same lines of inequity
as well.
At the height of nationwide protests for racial justice last summer, this led some prominent Black place-makers, activists, and equity
practitioners to challenge urbanists to question why they did not consider anti-Black racism as part of their professional scope, and whether
quick-build urbanism can ever be equitable in the absence of long-term investment and relationship-building in marginalized communities,
among other critiques.
Much can be learned from the Virginia Walkable Action Institute (VWAI), which has connected justice to policy over the past year of the
pandemic. The Institute is an experiential learning collaborative that brings together national and international experts with regional teams to
tackle issues of transportation justice and health equity in public space. From web conferences to drones to socially distant site visits, the VWAI
model was used to adapt to a year of global pandemic and civic unrest. 10
-48-

�Chapter 2: Kc) Recent Changes and Trends
Regional and National Trends

Creative Programing
As lockdowns have loosened, many placemaking organizations have
found new ways to lead events and community engagement efforts
safely. For example, public libraries have adapted remarkably during the
pandemic to continue providing access to books, media, programming,
and services. Librarians can be some of the best partners for placemakers and active transportation advocates, whether it's about
developing and cross-promoting programming, working together to
transform the built environment, or advocating for more walkable,
bikeable, and healthy communities.

Economic Opportunity
One of the many lasting impacts of the pandemic is the recession it has unleashed. Not only did unemployment hit over 14% at the height of the
pandemic, but more specific challenges, such as declining women's workforce participation and changes to commercial real estate may have
long-lived repercussions on the way our economy works.
In this context, placemaking has an important role to play. If downtowns (and commercial districts in Southfield like the City Centre and ODA)
must adapt to fewer in-person offices, and neighborhoods become where people spend most of their day, municipalities and communities must
adapt both places to a changing set of needs and pressures.
In national studies focused on economic opportunity, three exciting recent projects showcase a range of ways that place-makers are pitching in:
1) the state of "pocket patios" along commercial corridors in Austin, Texas, 2) the new vision for Union Square in New York City, which would
expand public open space by 33% and radically improve pedestrian safety on adjacent streets, and 3) the conversions of two brownfield sites, an
auto repair shop and a gas station, into a restaurant and food system collaborative-all using placemaking and active transportation principles.
Creative interventions like these that help small businesses adapt and become more than the sum of their parts through placemaking will only
become more important as we grapple with an ongoing recession and an evolving economy. 11

-49-

�Chapter 2: Key Recent Change~ and Trends
Regional and National Trend~

Retail Relocations

FIVE KEV EMERGING RETAIL TRENDS TO WATCH IN 2022 AND BEYOND
BY CRAIG PATTERSON

As we look ahead to a post-pandemic future, there's one
market segment that's currently ripe for redevelopment and
transformation: the traditional retail mall. With the massive
transformation of real estate spurred by the pandemic, retail
centers will emerge as one of the most valuable asset classes
in a post-pandemic landscape, as building owners, investors,
and developers look to reposition these aging, vacant, or
underutilized properties - converting them into vibrant,
mixed-use developments that will unlock latent value and
meet consumers' rapidly changing demands.
CBRE (the world's largest commercial real estate services
and investment firm) research predicts up to a 20%
reduction in total U.S. retail real estate inventory by 2025,
which will be largely triggered by large-scale adaptive reuse
and conversion, particularly among malls that have been the
most impacted by declining categories such as department
stores and apparel. According to CBRE, "Malls will require a
strategic evaluation of the highest and best use of the
underlying land and demand drivers for adaptive reuse and
conversion."
The City sees a triple bottom line - with environmental,
social, and economic benefits - in transforming existing
retail centers into multi-use environments. First,
the environmental benefits are clear: In the U.S., the
building industry accounts for 49% of total energy
consumption. One of the crucial ways to reduce carbon
impact is to reuse existing building stock and thereby limit
embodied carbon - the CO2 emissions associated with a
building's creation. The low-rise nature of these centers also
makes them perfect candidates for net-zero energy systems.
Low window-wall ratio and large expanses of roof can make
for an ideal canvas for energy savings and production. The

"1) Customers value inclusivity and sustainability:
To be seen as valuing employees and being sustainable, it's not enough for retailers to
put an "our people are our top priority" or "we're green" label on their websites.
Consumers are increasingly concerned about social justice and climate change, and
they're willing to change their loyalties to brands that are more in sync with their
values. They want to see retailers take meaningful steps such as protecting mental
health, hiring diverse employees, carbon labelling, comprehensive recycling, sourcing
products ethically and fairly.
2) Adding value in the supply chain:
Retailers depend on supply chains, and technology offers several ways to add greater
value. While some innovations still seem futuristic, like using drones or autonomous
robots for last-mile delivery, automation is clearly here to stay. Sobeys uses
automated warehouse processes to power their successful Voila delivery service.
3) Omnichannel transforms every stage of the retail experience:
Why is it so important for retailers to build their omnichannel abilities? Omnichannel
lets retailers meet consumer needs along every possible channel - in-store, online, or
a mix of the two. Research shows a strong link between opening physical stores and
increased traffic to online stores. In addition, as shoppers embrace shopping on social
platforms such as Facebook and lnstagram, retailers can use omnichannel to reach
new markets.
4) Engaging customers with experiential retail:
Another important trend that's linked to omnichannel is experiential retail. With
stores open again, consumers don't just want to shop, they want an engaging,
personalized experience. As customers travel through a store, omnichannel lets them
use their smartphones to access product information, sign up for exclusive events,
even order customized products for speedy delivery.
5) Technology helps staff deliver the competitive edge:
Experiential retail also highlights the ways that staff are a key competitive advantage.
Whether customers are shopping in person or online, interactions with skilled and
knowledgeable staff are essential. With technology, retail staff can access optimized
data to deliver more personalized experiences."
(Source: September 6, 2021, Retail Insider)

-50-

�Chapter 2: Key Recent Changes and Trends
Regional and National Trends

economic benefits are also self-evident: In addition to curbing emissions, repositioning existing structures can reduce energy consumption and
curb construction and demolition waste, leading to large financial savings.
And then there are the cultural and social benefits of adaptive reuse. In suburban areas, former malls have an opportunity to provide an
alternate to the cen t ral business district, providing flexible workspace environments much closer to our homes. At the height of its potential, a
retail center can transform into a town center, providing cultural, civic, or other diverse entities that may be missing. In urban environments,
many large, single-use assets provide unique opportunities to invigorate historic icons for the next generation.12

Missing Middle Housing
"Missing Middle Housing" is a term that encompasses all the housing types that residents want to live in but do not currently exist in a
community, usually because they are not provided for the zoning ordinance and/or master plan . Common missing middle housing types in older
Michigan communities, which typically have a high number of single-family homes, include duplexes, fourplexes, cottage courts, second-floor
apartments above commercial businesses, and multiplexes. These types of housing are generally compatible with the character of existing
single-family residential neighborhoods and can work to support walkability, provide locally serving retail, and improve access to public
transportation options. They can also provide a range of affordability to address the discrepancy between the cost of available housing stock and
the prices people can afford . As such, many municipalities are filling in the missing middle portions of their zoning codes by creating new
residential or mixed-use zoning districts that provide for one or more of these missing middle types by-right. 13
Elimination of Single-Family Exclusive Zone
California recently eliminated exclusive single-family zoning with the
passing of "the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency (HOME)
Act, which "facilitates the process for homeowners to build a duplex or split
their current residential lot, expanding housing options for people of all
incomes that will create more opportunities for homeowners to add units
on their existing properties." 14
Accessory Dwelling Units
Accessory dwelling units (ADUs), also known as granny flats, mother-in-law
apartments, or carriage houses, are housing units that are constructed on
the same parcel as an existing primary residence, such as a single-family
home. ADUs might be in an accessory building, such as a converted garage
or new construction, or attached to the primary residence, such as a
converted living space, attached garage, or an addition. At the height of the
suburbanization, communities favored low-density development defined

-51-

�Chapter 2: Key Recent Changes and Trends
Regional and National Trends

by large-lot single-family homes and ADUs, that were once a common amenity, were excluded from zoning codes. However, growing demand for
affordable housing, combined with limited land, has led to changing attitudes about the use and development of ADUs. Municipalities have
consistently found that ADUs are a cheap, easy way to increase the number of housing options while also meeting the needs of older adults,
empty-nesters, and young working professionals, many of whom are priced out of traditional homeownership. They also provide rental income
for homeowners, giving people a way to "cash in" on the equity of their home without having to sell it. AD Us are also one of the most affordable
options for both individuals and cities (if offered financial assistance) because they are often simple conversions, do not require the purchase of
new land, and are on lots that are already services by utilities. 15
Tiny Homes
Tiny homes are related to ADUs but may or may not be an ADU themselves. Tiny homes are houses that are 600 square feet or less, although
some are as small as 250 square feet. They can occupy a lot all by themselves or be on a lot with an existing home (which would make them an
ADU), and they may be connected to municipal energy and water or be off-the-grid. Tiny homes are made out a variety of materials - wood,
metal panels, former shipping containers - and are often movable by trailer hitch, although some are permanent fixtures.

Remote Office Work
The COVID-19 pandemic and State of Michigan mandates changed
the office work environment overnight in March 2020. In May of
2021, employers are now contemplating bringing employees back,
albeit slowly, to the workforce for in-person work because the State
of Michigan and the CDC will no longer need to require remote work
for most employee's due to higher levels of those getting the COVID19 vaccines. Further, companies are responding to employee
concerns and comments regarding hybrid "3-2-r work schedules (in
office and work from home options) that allow for a greater work-life
balance. The 3-2-2 schedule balance traditional and remote work,
where employees work for three days in office, two days remote, and
two days off. Employers are also embracing digital nomads: a person
who earns a living working online in various locations of their
choosing (rather than a fixed business location).

FROM SHE-SESSION TO SHE-RECOVERY: RISING FROM THE PANDEMIC
KIM LESSLEY
"From the start of the global pandemic, it was apparent that the economic
fallout affected women more than men. It was initially dubbed the 'shecession' because so many aspects of the economic crisis fell
disproportionately on women. Women had higher job losses, lower wages,
and increased responsibilities juggling careers with children's education.

During the so-called 'she-cession', all of the responsibilities from three
normally separate areas of our lives - workplace, home, and school converged within our own four walls, and it was a struggle for many.
The global pandemic touched all of our lives in different ways. For some, it's
an ongoing inconvenience. For others, it was a life-changing shift that has
set their lives on a new course.
While many women are embarking on new entrepreneurial ventures,
others are considering re-entering the corporate world. As we move
forward with the 'she-covery', businesses need to step up to support
current and future employees and their families to create a better
employee experience." (SAP, July 29, 2021)

-52-

�Chapter 2: Kt•y Recent Changes and Trends
Regional and National Trends

Hotels and Short-Term Rentals
The hospitality industry is changing faster than ever. Today's travelers have
a myriad of options for accommodations; besides traditional hotels, they
can choose between vacation rentals, hostels, serviced apartments,
treehouses, and even underwater hotels. As people travel more frequently
and for longer durations - and as platforms like Airbnb allow any
accommodation provider to reach a large audience online - the
characteristics of accommodations themselves are changing.
In addition to forward-thinking hotel tech, we're seeing changes to the
workforce and work culture, shifting guest preferences, and an increased
focus on eco-friendliness. A focus on environmental sustainability isn't
new, but the degree to which guests expect (and prefer) eco-friendly
products and services is. Simply suggesting that guests reuse towels for an
extra day isn't enough; today's traveler wants to stay at hotels that have
integrated green practices in all aspects of their business. From physical
changes to hotel buildings, like the addition of solar panels, to menus with more vegetarian and vegan choices, it's evident that these
environmentally friendly trends are here to stay.
Also, travelers are seeking new experiences, whether through wellness, outdoor activities, gastronomy, or a specific interest like sports or music.
They're traveling solo, with a group, or on business, and they might learn about a destination or travel brand via social media, rather than
traditional marketing channels. Today's traveler has an open mind, choosing funky motels or glamping over standard hotels and even visiting
emerging destinations before they've popped up on the tourism radar.
Based on these trends, it will be a lot less "big box" and a lot more "out of the box." Hotel design trends show a focus on art, community, and
uniqueness. Guests crave design that echoes the destination's character, whether with local art or the architecture itself. In some hotels, the
space itself is what drives uniqueness, with creative lobby ideas or public areas that showcase nature. 16
Other trends in the hotel industry include:
•
•
•

Hotel loan default rates continue to increase, and many hotels will be sold not as an ongoing business but for the value of the real estate
Developers are not building new hotels and won't be for the foreseeable future
Some hotels will not survive post-pandemic, and many may be targeted for apartment redevelopment projects

-53-

�.........

Chapter 2: Key R~ccnt Changes and Trends
Re~ional and National Trends

New Industrial Businesses
While other industries are seeing major disruptions, the industrial sector has been growing since the onset of the pandemic. Although industrial
facilities have seen recent supply chain disruptions, the following trends persist:
•
•
•
•

Self-storage is red hot; rents, valuations soar as sector keeps growing
The industrial sector is booming due to the demand for logistics and distribution; vacancy rates are very low, and developers are
scrambling to find good sites (developers are trying to find any sites with industrial zoning or sites that can be rezoned to industrial)
Amazon fulfillment centers are selling for huge prices on the investment market
Logistics is still the hottest category of industrial real estate 17

. ~z ·s~~i~i~\,~,sri:4~1ffi~·1d/ ~1?,·~; :?~~-~
. t \._r~;-~-~-; _...,.~-&lt;t:·.1;.,.:·-·:-~•\ti, ◄. "(~~J,.~

-54-

�Chapter 2: Key Recent Changes and Tr&lt;.·nds
Regional and National Trends

US Inflation Rate Rises
The annual inflation rate in the US accelerated to 9.1% in June of 2022, the highest since November of 1981, from 8.6% in May and above
market forecasts of 8.8%. Energy prices rose 41.6%, the most since April 1980, boosted by gasoline (59.9%, the largest increase since March
1980), fuel oil (98.5%), electricity (13.7%, the largest increase since April 2006), and natural gas (38.4%, the largest increase since October 2005).
Food costs surged 10.4%, the most since February 1981, with food at home jumping 12.2%, the most since April 1979. Prices also increased
significantly for shelter (5.6%, the most since February 1991). 18

The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting
The Great Resignation is an ongoing economic trend in which have voluntarily
resigned from their jobs in great numbers, beginning in early 2021. Possible causes
include wage stagnation amid rising cost of living, long-lasting job dissatisfaction,
safety concerns of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the desire to work for companies
with better remote-working policies.
People are switching jobs and industries, moving from traditional to nontraditional
roles, retiring early, or starting their own businesses. They are taking a time-out to
tend to their personal lives or embarking on new personal or professional
journeys. 19

Rethinking the Public Rights-of-Way
Recent developments, including the COVID-19 pandemic, increased demand for micromobility solutions to rethink the design and planning of public rights-of-way. Today,
sidewalks and pathways are not only used by pedestrians, but they also accommodate
scooter riders, skateboarders, autonomous delivery vehicles and even outdoor dining. In
particular, bike sharing and e-bikes have seen a steep rise in demand since the onset of
the COVID-19 Pandemic. Due to multiple users, functions and purposes, there is
increasing need to review policies and regulations of these traditional pedestrian
pathways. 20

-55-

�~

�Chapter 3: Healthy Living

Introduction

Chapter 3: Healthy Living
Introduction
The physical design of our City affects our health every time we step out our front doors. Sometimes making healthy choices is not easy. Being
physically active is hard if you do not have access to sidewalks or parks and eating right is hard if healthy foods are not available. Our health is
affected by the physical design of our community. This following chapter discusses how planning and designing communities with health in mind
can lead to improved community health, wellness, and quality of life.
A popular definition of health comes from the World Health Organization . They define health as the state of complete physical, mental, and
social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. This means that health is more than being free of disease or not feeling sick
- it is also a state of physical, mental, and social well-being. This state can bring about such feelings as happiness, contentment, and security.
Major factors that determine health are:
•

•
•

Family Health History: Many people have a family health history of some chronic diseases (like cancer, coronary heart disease, and
diabetes) and health conditions (like high blood pressure). People who have a close family member with a chronic disease may have a
higher risk for developing that disease than those without such a family member.
Behaviors/Lifestyles: We all make choices that affect our health. Some people choose to eat healthy, get regular physical activity and
maintain a healthy weight; they don't smoke or put themselves at risk for injury or catching a disease.
Environment: The environment can directly influence our health, such as when we are exposed to pollution or injured due to
environmental hazards, and it also influences our behavior and lifestyle. Behaviors and lifestyle choices are in part, shaped by the
environment where people are born, grow, live, work, worship, and age and the health systems available to them. The term
"environment" can include the social, cultural, political, natural, and built environments. These environments can affect physical and
mental health. The fabric of a community and the community pool of human resources available to it are often called "social
capital." This term refers to the individual and communal time and energy available for such things as community improvement, social
networking, civic engagement, personal recreation, and other activities that create social bonds between individuals and groups. Such
activities and bonds can affect mental and physical health.

Background &amp; History
Racial Disparities in Health
Southfield, like many other southeast Michigan communities with diverse populations, has a history of racial discrimination which continues to
create disparities in health today. As of 2016, Southfield still had a worse than average black infant mortality rate. 21 As such, achieving health

-57-

�I_
Chapter :J: Healthy Living
Background &amp; Histo11

equity is one of the key goals that the City continues to strive for in 2022. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided the following
definition of health equity:

"Health equity means that everyone has a fair and jr,st opportunity to be as healthy as possible This requires removing obstacles to
health such as poverty, discrimination, and their consequences, including powerlessness and lack of access to good jobs with fair pay,
quality education and housing, safe environments, and health care."
Foundation staff members put forth these four key steps to achieve health equity:
1.

Identify important health disparities. Many disparities in health are rooted in inequities in the opportunities and resources needed to
be as healthy as possible. The determinants of health include living and working conditions, education, income, neighborhood
characteristic, social inclusion, and medical care. An increase in opportunities to be healthier will benefit everyone but more focus
should be placed on groups that have been excluded or marginalized in the past.

2.

Change and implement policies, laws, systems, environments, and practices to reduce inequities in the opportunities and resources
needed to be as healthy as possible. Eliminate the unfair individual and institutional social conditions that give rise to the inequities.

3.

Evaluate and monitor efforts using short- and long-term measures as it may take decades or generations to reduce some health
disparities. In order not to underestimate the size of the gap between advantaged and disadvantaged, disadvantaged groups should not
be compared to the general population but to advantaged groups.

4.

Reassess process strategies and outcomes/plan next steps. Actively engage those most affected by disparities in the identification,
design, implementation, and evaluation of promising solutions.

-58-

�Cha1&gt;tcr :i: Healthy Living
Current Conditions

Current Conditions
Environmental Conditions
Green and Open Space
Like many legacy cities in southeast
Michigan, Southfield's natural
environment faces challenges due to
the city's history of industrialization.
Southfield is largely built-up, having
been developed as a bedroom suburb
for Detroit, and is constrained in its
ability to provide open space - there
are no massive tracts of undeveloped
land that can be set-aside as future
preserves or parks, so the city must
make do with what it has. Additionally,
many parking lots and developments
were built without sustainability in
mind and now negatively impact air
and water quality, as well as the mental
experience of passerby. As such, as the
city squeezes more trees and gardens
in where it can, improving the
environmental conditions for humans
and other animals in the city remains
an uphill battle. However, Southfield
has been routinely restoring wetlands
when possible, including the wet prairie Lincoln Woods, and continues to protect the mature trees that remain in Carpenter Lake Nature
Preserve, Bauervic Woods Park, and Valley Woods Nature Preserve. The City now regulated tree removals as well, in an effort to protect and
increase the trees throughout the city and maintain them as an amenity that provides shade, water and air purification, and aesthetic
improvements. For more information on the natural environment, please see the summary of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan in Chapter
7: Sub-Area Plans.
-59-

�Chapter :-J: Healthy U\'ing
Current ('onditions

Map 2. Southfield Parks and Nature Areas

r:::::J

.25 mile Radius

c::J

.5 mile Radius

-60-

1.5 mile Radius

�Chapter a: Healthy Living
Current Conditions

Climate
The climate of Southfield and southeast Michigan is influenced by its location within significant storm tracks, the
overall influence of the Great Lakes, and the urban "heat island" of metro Detroit. The most pronounced lake
effect is in cloud cover. Southfield averages 176 sunny days per year. The US average is 205 sunny days. Most
winter storms originate to the northwest throughout Michigan except in metro Detroit where much of the
heaviest precipitation comes from southwest winds. According to US Climate Data, the summer high is around
83.6 in July, and the winter low in January is 17.3. The growing season averages 180 days, with the last frost
date in early May and a first frost date in late October. The snow average is 35.2 inches a year, and the rain
average is 33.5 inches per year. Together, the snowy and rainy climate makes it difficult for many residents to
engage in a healthy lifestyle for much of the year, which is a major consideration for the city when planning the
recreation and transportation networks.
In addition to Michigan's baseline cloudy and snowy climate, climate change is already having noticeable health
impacts as temperatures rise, leading to more dangerously hot days, and pollution increases, affecting those
with lung conditions. The impacts of climate change on agriculture (e.g., early frosts that kill crops) and the
natural environment also affect individual health by lowering the amount of green space available to combat
the negative effects of a warming world - unmitigated habitat loss creates a vicious cycle of more and more
heating. How we design our communities may also determine how well we cope with climate change in the
future. People are exposed to climate change through changing weather patterns (for example, more intense and frequent extreme events) and
indirectly through changes in water, air, food quality and quantity, ecosystems, agriculture, and economy. At this early stage the effects of
climate change are small but are expected to steadily increase in all countries and regions.
Because automobile emissions account for 26% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions (a contributor to climate change), healthy community design
elements may help slow down the effects of climate change
by providing alternatives to driving cars such as walking, biking
and public transit. As cities grow larger, they may experience
stronger and longer heat waves because of the urban heat
island effect. Two factors create the urban heat island effect:
the loss of trees and vegetative cover to development (since
tree canopy and plantings function to cool cities and
waterways by shading surfaces, buildings, and waterways,
deflecting solar radiation and transpiring water back to the
atmosphere) and the construction of dark surfaces (especially
pavement and rooftops) that absorb heat and re-radiate that
heat.

-61-

�lChapter :1: Healthy Lidng
Current Conditions

Community design elements that may help lessen the urban heat island effect, in addition to providing air and water quality benefits described
above, include:
•
•
•
•

Creating parks, green rooftop parks, gardens, and green spaces
Promoting green infrastructure stormwater management techniques in site design, including the trees, green roofs, permeable
pavements, and other plantings that filter water and reduce heat island effects
Making building energy-efficient
Minimizing the use of dark surfaces that absorb heat and re-radiate that heat during the evenings, when the cities would otherwise cool
down

For a further discussion of climate change and its relationship to flooding and stormwater, please see Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure.

Brownfield Contamination
In addition to limited remaining green spaces, Southfield faces another challenge due to the city's history of
development: brownfield contamination. Brownfield properties are those where redevelopment or reuse of the
property may be difficult because of the presence or perception of contamination - decommissioned gas stations
or industrial facilities are prime examples. If mismanaged, these properties can threaten the health of residents
and the environment by releasing toxic contamination into the air, water, or soil, that will require extensive cleanup. However, when managed properly, these properties can be cleaned and turn into an asset for the community;
the reuse of brownfield protects the environment and health of residents, as well as revitalizes communities by
turning vacant property into economic opportunity, reusing existing infrastructure, and minimizing urban sprawl.

Lear Headquarters
36.4 acres - Base Year: 2005

Comau Southfield
9.2 acres - Base Year: 2008

Central Park Place
8.2 acres - Base Year: 2009

Durr Headquarters
14.4 acres - Base Year: 2014

Southfield Park Plaza

9.4 acres - Base Year: 2015
Southfield has been proactively managing the city's brownfield sites for years to ensure they are property re-used
Centex/Spring Haven
to support healthy living and a strong economy. The Southfield Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (SBRA) was
38.9 acres - Base Year: 2006
created on August 20, 2001, under the authority of Public Act 381 of 1996, the Brownfield Redevelopment
25110/25250 Evergreen
Financing Act. Per Act 381, the City Council designated the board of the Southfield Local Development Financing
2.3 acres - Base Year: 2010
Authority as the board of the SBRA. The purpose of the SBRA is to promote the revitalization, redevelopment,
Figure 7. Brownfield Sites in
and reuse of certain contaminated, blighted, or obsolete properties primarily using tax increment financing. As
22
Southfield
of 2021, Southfield had seven ongoing brownfield redevelopment projects.

Waterways
Southfield is home to both a Branch of the Rouge River and numerous related streams and creeks. Most of the city's waterways are heavily
urbanized and not yet safe for swimming or fish consumption, but a few residents do occasionally use the surface waters as a source of
recreation (kayaking, canoeing, birdwatching, etc.).

-62-

�-=
"=

...
.:f

=&gt;J

~

,.

~

~

:.i:

:.5

-=

..::.

:::

,I

~

~

~
~

--

...

:i:

=
-,,t

:::::

II

~

;....
.,,,

.

~

-s~ .
:::s

•

•

.

...

•

II:

0
v-,

-~ •

'~

~

0

~

QJ
.....

~

~
I

("()

\.0
I

I

I

""'Q.0
~

.•

)

I

....
~

.,,.

r

,½~
,,
I

I
~

:

-

~

J

""

)

~

I

-

,..

...I

./

l

J
@

----

�Chapter :i: l lealthy Li\'in~
Current Conditions

Individual Health
There are many individual obstacles that people face to becoming healthy, whether those are disabilities, long-term health conditions, or other
factors that affect their daily life. The City of Southfield can help people with individual health obstacles achieve a healthy lifestyle through
inclusive programming and public space design and accommodating all people - regardless of their health status - is one of the main goals of the
2022 Parks and Recreation Plan and is heavily incorporated in Sustainable Southfield.

Disability
As of 2019, 12.9% of Southfield residents under the age of 65 were living with a mental or physical disability that affected their daily life.
Combined with residents over 65 who have age-related disabilities, this means that thousands of Southfield residents have individual challenges
that make pushing healthy living uniquely difficult. In total, Southfield has approximately 13,000 residents living with a disability, over half of
whom have a disability that affects their day-to-day mobility. Accommodating populations with disabilities is necessary to attract potential
residents and retain existing residents by improving everyone's quality of life. 23

Other Conditions
Southfield also has a high number of residents with pre-existing conditions or diseases with long-lasting impacts that affect one's ability to stay
healthy. As of 2018, Oakland County had higher rates of cancer and critical care hospital admissions than the state of Michigan as a whole, and
24.7% of all deaths were caused by heart disease, compared to 23.1% statewide. However, despite the high cancer rates in Oakland County, it
remains one of the less significant causes of death in the county, meaning that more people require treatment but more people also recover. 24

Healthy Food Access
When residents live in a place where healthy foods are not accessible and affordable, it is especially difficult for them to practice healthy living.
Studies have found that low-income and underserved communities often have limited access to stores that sell healthy food, especially highquality fruits and vegetables. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Desert Locator gives a spatial overview of low-income neighborhoods
with high concentrations of people who are far from a grocery store. The tool reveals that the southwest corner of Southfield is considered a
partial food desert because a significant number of residents are more than 0.5 miles from a store that sells healthy food .25
Good nutrition is vital to good health and disease prevention. But it's hard for people to eat their fruits and vegetables (and to stay away from
too much junk food) if they don't have access to fruits and vegetables. In one study of 50,000 neighborhood blocks in Detroit, researchers found
that 92% of food retailers were comprised of "fringe food outlets" such as liquor stores and fast-food restaurants, while only 8% were grocery
stores of any size. Access to affordable and healthy food is a part of healthy community design, and Southfield has many opportunities to
improve through a variety of local regulations and programs.

-64-

�C.lrnptcr ;3: Healthy Lh-ing
Current Conditions

Diversity and Inclusion
Part of leading a healthy lifestyle is having a healthy mind - less stressors means that people are more able to concentrate on bettering their
own individual health and helping the natural environment. Stress can also have adverse cardiovascular effects and negatively affect long-term
health . One part of lowering mental stress is creating an environment where everyone is comfortable to be themselves, regardless of their
ethnicity, religion, age, income, family living situation, disability status, appearance, or anything else that makes them unique. Encouraging and
fostering inclusion lowers individual stress, in turn giving people the freedom to fully pursue healthy living.
The City of Southfield is a progressive community that is a welcoming, livable, sustainable, vibrant, walkable, and inclusive city that provides
equal opportunities to all individuals. The City of Southfield has long been an integrated community that is welcoming to people of all ages,
races, religions, and socio-economic backgrounds. To that end, Southfield was the first city in the State of Michigan to partner with residents and
other community stakeholders to create the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Task Force to address and embrace the City's changing demographics.
The Task Force and the City work collectively together to help facilitate inclusion and integration peacefully and constructively. Southfield was
also the first city in the state to hold a Dr. King peace walk or march to celebrate the legacy of not only Dr. King, but Southfield's own diversity
and inclusion. The first Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Peace Walk took place on January 20, 1986, commemorating the first national observance of
Dr. King's birthday. The Task Force and Walk both continue to grow and scope each year, now with year-long educational and community
outreach activities, many especially geared towards youth .
In addition, Southfield has a significant orthodox Jewish community located in the City. We want to be cognizant of the fact that every Saturday
(Friday sundown to Saturday sundown) is the day of rest for the Jewish Community and that they are unable to participate in City sponsored
events.

LTU Summer Camp: Introduction to Landscape Architecture
In the summer of 2022, the City of Southfield Planning Department partnered with the Michigan chapter of the American Society of Landscape
Architects (ASLA) and Lawrence Technological University (LTU) to host an Introduction to Landscape Architecture Summer Camp for high school
students. The goal of the three-day camp was to expose a diverse population of high school students to the field of Landscape Architecture.
Student participants attended from 7 various high schools located in southeast Michigan and were grouped into two teams in order to work
together on the concept design of a hypothetical teen park component.
Throughout the three days, students had the opportunity to learn from industry experts by attending presentations, visit project sites for design
inspiration, and create a conceptual design with hands-on tools. The camp concluded with the students presenting their final design concepts to
their peers and instructors. The overall experience was extremely successful, and the City hopes to continue conducting summer camps in the
future.

-65-

��~~

......

,,,....~~

Chapter :J: Healthy Lhing
Recent Programs and lnitiathes

Recent Programs and Initiatives
Southfield Peace Poles and Walk
In October 2020, the City celebrated the installation of three "peace polls," set in a landscaped garden to the
north of the entrance to City Hall. The poles declare "May Peace Prevail on Earth" in 24 world languages,
including sign language and braille. With a theme of sustainability, the poles represent global peace through
the May Peace Prevail on Earth International and Amigos de la Paz (friends of peace) nonprofit organizations.
The City of Southfield also created the Total Living Commission (TLC) to analyze and address overall quality of
life issue in Southfield and successful integration. The Commission regularly makes recommendations to
Council on matters from legislative policy to new city programs and initiatives. One such program recently
developed by TLC was the Southfield Ambassadors and the Southfield Spirit Fest parade and celebration of
Southfield's diversity.

20 Minutes of Heart Healthy Activity
Recently, the American Heart Association found that just 20-minutes of physical activity was associated with
lower rates of incident cardiovascular diseases. The greatest cardiovascular risk reduction was observed for
those over 70 who were getting more than 20 minutes per day of physical activity. 26 To help reduce
cardiovascular disease in the community, the City of Southfield has been promoting 20-minutes of daily heart
healthy activity. One major effort has been the opening of the Civic Center atrium to the public for indoor
walking - anyone is welcome year-round to come inside and walk the atrium loop, and informational signs
calculating the number of laps equaling one mile have been posted throughout.

2021 All-America City Award (AAC) Competition
Equity is the fabric that allows communities to achieve broad-based economic prosperity and other goals.
Resilience enables communities to face challenging times by not only preserving what makes their
community great but adapting and growing stronger. Inclusive civic engagement is a key ingredient in
communities that have these two qualities.
The need for equity and resilience became more obvious in 2020, as communities have dealt with a global
pandemic and racial bias incidents in law enforcement. Those communities with more equity and resilience
have been more successful in combating the pandemic and making the needed changes to improve the racial
equity of law enforcement and other city services.

-67-

3:
~

~
c»
n
CD

1
Di

-0

-■

:::s

rn
m

�Chapter :J: Healthy Living
Recent Programs and lnitiath·c~

The All-America City Award not only recognizes strong civic capital, it also honors the progress and innovation demonstrated through the crosssector partnerships in three project examples. It recognizes a community's courage to recognize its challenges, along with commitment to face
those challenges with the same spirit exhibited in the highlighted projects. It's about moving forward and getting the hard work done
collaboratively, innovatively, inclusively and with maximum civic engagement.
•

The City of Southfield was selected (March 2021) as a national finalist for the 2021 All-America City Award (AAC). The 20 national
finalists represent the diversity of American communities from the largest cities to the smallest towns, from east to west and north to
south.

•

The award, given to 10 communities each year since 1949, celebrates and recognizes villages, towns, cities, counties, tribes, and regions
that engage residents in innovative, inclusive, and effective efforts to tackle critical challenges.

Unfortunately, Southfield was not one of the top 10 finalists for the National Civic League's 72 nd annual All-America City Awards (AAC) . However,
the City of Southfield's Kimmie Horne Jazz Festival entry won the Cultural Entertainment Showcase award.

Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives
As a community with a majority African American population, Southfield residents
and officials have been particularly touched and impacted by the historic and recent
acts of police brutality and racial injustice. In response to the most recent national
tragedy of the murder of George Floyd, the city installed new Black Lives
Matter and Southfield Strong banners. The banner installation was just one of the
city's responses to the tragedy.
•

Southfield Unity Day- Kneel to Heal, June 14, 2020: At this event
attendees formed a symbolic human chain of unity and kneeled for eight
minutes and forty-two seconds to honor the life of George Floyd.

•

Black Men Unite Peaceful Protest- June 28, 2020: The march was designed
to unite Black men while protesting police brutality and racial injustice. The
event also included a voter registration drive and 2020 Census
encouragement.

•

"Our Sorrow and Determination for a More Equal and Just Society" Joint Resolution: The Southfield City Council and Mayor adopted
this joint resolution to show solidarity with efforts to root out systemic racism. The city also continues to support training, policies and
practices for police officers that de-escalate tense situations and avoid the use of deadly force.

•

Southfield Police Department Duty to Intervene Policy: A new policy amendment was adopted that requires every sworn employee
present at any scene to stop another sworn employee when force is being inappropriately applied or is no longer required.

-68-

�,,.... ,...

~

Chapter :3: lkalt.hy Living
Recent Programs and Initiatives

•

My Brother's Keeper (MBK): The Southfield Chapter of MBK hosts monthly meetings featuring different guest speakers, in addition to
other activities, events and field trips to mentor Southfield's young men of color.

•

International Peace Poles Installation &amp; Dedication - November 6, 2020: The city held a dedication ceremony for the installation of
new International Peace Poles.

•

Juneteenth - June 15-22, 2022: The City of Southfield recognized Juneteenth (officially Juneteenth National Independence Day and also
known as Jubilee Day, Emancipation Day, Freedom Day, and Black Independence Day) with a week-long series of events and activities to
highlight the celebration of African American history and culture. Events included a free outdoor jazz and blues concert, a dance
performance, book displays in the Southfield Public Library, art exhibitions, and a walk led by Southfield Mayor Kenson Siver. The week
culminated in a celebration on the Municipal Campus front lawn which included appearances by Black Cowboy LC. Caldwell, the
Tuskegee Airmen, reenactments by actors dressed as famous Africari Americans throughout history, a drumming workshop, more dance
performances, music, children's activities, games, crafts, and food trucks.

-69-

�Chapter 3: Healthy Li\'iug
Recent Programs and Inilialin?s

Best Cities for Black Women
Black women serve a critical role in the American economy, contributing $3.8 billion to the GDP annually. Often the breadwinners for their
families, they have the highest labor force participation rate for women and make up 21% of all women -owned businesses.
Even with these significant contributions, Black women live at the intersection of multiple barriers and experience the compounded effects of
racial and gender bias. This combination results in low-wage jobs and a significant wealth gap: Black women who work full-time, year-round earn
62 cents for every one dollar that white men earn working full-time, year-round.
When posed that question, Dr. Lori Martin, a professor
of African and African American studies and sociology
at Louisiana State University, had this to say: "A livable
place for Black women is safe, and for women with
children, it is home to schools where all students have
access to an excellent education. It would also be
diverse, with a visible and thriving black community,
including black businesses."

~

While the socioeconomic realities of our current time
touch all corners of the country, there are pockets of
the U.S. where the wealth gap narrows, and Black
women have more opportunities.
MoneyGeek ranked 200 cities with populations greater
than 65,000 from the best to the worst for Black
women . The ranking includes analysis of income,
poverty rate, homeownership, educational attainment,
and health insurance gaps between Black women and
the entire population nationally and locally. The size of
the local Black population and the cost of crime in the
area was included in the ranking to reflect the
presence of Black community and safety,
respectively. 27
Southfield was ranked the best city for black women
in the U.S. with a score of 100!

-70-

,,

�-,
Chapter :3: l·lcalth) Lh·ing
Recent Programs and lnitiatiYcs

AARP Designation Process
The Southfield Commission on Senior Adults (COSA), established in 1987, is the
primary community-led voice for these matters. Consisting of local older adults
and City liaisons, this commission identifies Senior Adult issues in the community
and works closely with City Departments to solve them.
Current demographic trends show that Southfield is an aging community.
Because of growth, it is important for the City to review all its resources and
protocols to ensure that older adults are effectively cared for and have excellent
livability as they take up a greater proportion of the population.
Matters related to Senior Adult livability include:
•
•
•
•
•

Housing (adequate facilities and number of units)
Transportation (access to bus routes and other forms of transit)
The public realm (addressing sidewalk gaps and universal accessibility)
Social inclusion
Health services

One of COSA's primary goals is to maintain the city's "Age-Friendly Community"
designation from the AARP, which was received in 2017. The initial Action Plan
authored by COSA five years ago included several surveys which gathered
important information, as well as an inventory of current senior-related assets.
The Planning Department sends a liaison to COSA meetings and is involved with
the Commission as they develop their report. Many of COSA's goals and action
plans for their Housing, Transportation, and Outdoor Spaces and Buildings
domains overlap with ongoing Planning Department objectives, and Planning
continues to help them implement these goals and objectives today. Currently,
the Planning Department is working with the Transpcrtation domain to identify
high-priority bus stops that currently lack amenities to provide better
accessibility, as well as a bench and trash receptacle. The Planning Department
also works to help and data to COSA for their reports, as requested, and will
continue to assist them as they work towards renewing the Age-Friendly
designation.

-71-

�.,
Chapter :J: Healthy Living
Key Trends &amp; Challcnge8

Key Trends &amp; Challenges
Pandemic Impacts on Health
The year 2020 had many unique and unprecedented challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic not only posed threats to
Michigan's entire population, but particularly to marginalized communities, including people of color. Since the beginning of the pandemic, racial
and ethnic minority populations have experienced a disproportionate impact, both in terms of morbidity and mortality as well as economic
harm. African Americans still had the highest mortality rate for COVID-19 at 221 deaths per 100,000, compared to white Michiganders, which
had the second highest rate of 112 deaths per 100,000. 28 As a majority Black city, these impacts have hit particularly close to home for Southfield
residents.

Mixed Use
Parks, green spaces and public places for leisure and social activities and communities that are mixed-use, which means a mix of housing, civic
uses, and commercial uses, including retail, restaurants, and offices. Mixed use allows a community member to work closer to where they live,
thus reducing their amount of commuting time and increasing their time for leisure and social activities.
Finding a good home in a safe neighborhood, that's convenient to jobs, good schools, and other daily needs, can be difficult. Usually,
neighborhoods with lots of amenities are more expensive because more people want to live there. People who work in these neighborhoods,
but can't afford to live there, may have to live far away in areas that are not safe. Workers like police officers, firefighters, and teachers who
contribute so much to a community may have to sacrifice safety and convenience for affordability.
Healthy community design principles support social equity by promoting:
•
•
•

Communities where people of all abilities and ages can move about their community for all their needs, and should they choose, remain
in their community all their lives.
Diverse housing options and price levels so that all persons regardless of income can live in the same community where they work, play
and worship.
Neighborhoods clustered around one or more well-defined neighborhood centers that support jobs of all types and skills, commercial
activity, and a range of amenities.

Creating safe and comfortable streets and sidewalks helps encourage community members to incorporate physical activity into their daily
routine by biking and walking. Less people using cars also translates into better air quality and lower heat levels, making it easier to safely pursue
outdoor exercise and activity. These improvements, combined with adequate housing, make it a no-brainer for people to get out and enjoy their
community while pursuing individual health. For more detail on the trend toward 20-minute (mixed use) neighborhoods and the trend toward
increasing housing options, please see Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character below.

-72-

�~ ~

·-~
Chapter :1: HcaltJ1y Living
Key Findings

Key Findings
Strengths and Opportunities
Robust Programing
Residents in Southfield have access to many healthcare resources and programs, either provided locally, regionally, or through non-profit or
medical providers. The City of Southfield partners with Providence Hospital (PH), American Cancer Society (ACS), American Heart Association
(AHA), Lawrence Technological University (LTU), the City Centre Advisory Board (CCAB) and other health agencies and local businesses to
promote and support annual Healthy Initiatives. Additionally, St. John Providence Community Health offers a variety of programs designed to
improve healthy living, such as the Infant Mortality Project.

Weaknesses and Threats
High Number of Uninsured Residents
Despite the many healthcare programs available, Southfield still has a significant number of uninsured and underinsured individuals -without
insurance, residents cannot take advantage of many of the programs that may improve their individual health. This is not just a problem for
Southfield, but for all the municipalities and counties in the Detroit metro area; estimates for the city of Detroit alone are that 200,000
individuals are uninsured. Some programs do provide services for the uninsured, such as St. John's Ryan White Program (provides services to
uninsured HIV patients who need early intervention, diagnosis, and treatment) and Health Care for the Uninsured Program (provides primary
care services for those 19 to 64 years of age, up to 200% of poverty). Even with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, there is still a
need to assist Southfield's residents in finding an insurance package that works for them.

Service Gaps
Most Southfield residents live within walking distance of some sort of medical office, hospital, urgent care, or other similar facility. However,
some areas of the city, such as the neighborhood along Inkster Road, still have less access than others. The City does not currently understand
all the medical service gaps that exist because of geography, and how those gaps may correlate with different health outcomes. A community
health assessment could remedy this lack of knowledge and help the city better plan for new health care facilities in the future.

-73-

~

::.-,

�Chapter :1: Healthy Li\'ing
Goals, OhjcctiYcs, and Strategics

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies
Goals
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Eliminate local food deserts
Reduce city' obesity rates and encourage healthy food choices, especially among children
Promote alternative modes of mobility with a focus on active transportation and micro-mobility
Work toward improved mental health outcomes for the community
Promote active living by making it safer to walk or bike to daily activities like shopping, work, school, and recreation
Build a more equitable community where the health and well-being of all people is supported, regardless of age, ethnicity,
national origin, or disability status
Engage in outreach that targets minorities and under-represented groups in community meetings, land use and planning
commission, and hiring decisions
Promote and encourage individual and communal time and energy available for such things as community improvement,
social networking, civic engagement, personal recreation, and other activities that create social bonds between individuals
and groups

Objectives and Strategies
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Promote educational programs for healthy living
Promote exercise programs
Promote and provide more public sports events and programs
Promote public and semi-public exercise facilities (outdoor and indoor)
Identify locations for and construct community gardens
Create provisions that allow for more flexible placement of community gardens throughout the city
Adopt zoning policies and regulations that promote and support urban agriculture activities
Revisit and update internal hiring diversity policy
Provide technical assistance and outreach efforts that increase equal access to land use resources and economic development
tools
Promote greater equality of access to minority business development and support land use and zoning that increases goods
and services in resource poor neighborhoods
Hold annual bike-the-town events to encourage people to get comfortable with and excited about cycling
Revise the city's Public Engagement Plan to incorporate more innovative and inclusive engagement methods that are shown
to be effective in reaching under-served populations

-74-

�: Housin

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Introduction

Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Introduction
About As a first ring suburb of Detroit, the City of Southfield is characterized by singlefamily homes on large lots and luxury apartments, as well as an aging population. The
city's residential character has been defined by its history as an automotive-oriented
patchwork of suburban developments, and this layout continues to shape the residential
offerings through the city today.
Southfield's housing values are generally hover around $100,000 to $200,000 for a twobedroom detached home property values, reflecting both market potential and the
negative price spillovers resulting from the city's proximity to Detroit. Detroit's
underfunded public educational system, above average crime rates and poverty rates,
shrinking employment opportunities, and low housing values all impact the prices of new
and existing homes in Southfield . According to the Southfield Assessor, housing values
have steadily increased following the post-recession low of 2013 . The 2022 Residential
Assessed Values ($2,114,241,840) have increased roughly 6.78 percent above the 2008
high ($1,980,028,850), recovering 55% between 2018 through 2022 over the last 5 years.
The recovery has remained steady from year to year, and we have been witnessing a
sellers' market with low supply, where residential values have increased an average 11%
per year since 2018.
Like many other legacy communities in southeast Michigan, Southfield's housing needs
Map 4. Sketch Map of 1870s Southfield Township
are also being affected by national demographic shifts. Aging Baby Boomers were at
their peak family size and peak income between 1990-2010 29 but now nuclear family unit is a minority throughout America. About 25% of new
households prefer condos and urban townhomes, and most young adults and older adults prefer living in walkable neighborhoods that are
sustainably designed, characterized by diverse land uses, and have a broad array of civic amenities. In 2019, the number of residents over 65
grew by 20.7%, faster than the overall rate of 18.9% in southeast Michigan. By 2030, the number of Americans over 65 number could rise to 500
million, 30 and the City of Southfield's housing needs will be impacted by this demographic shift.

-76-

�-,
Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Hackground &amp; History

Background &amp; History
History of Development
Before incorporating as a City, Southfield Township began seeing the
effects of the suburban housing boom almost immediately after the
end of World War II. Southfield issued only 147 building permits in
1944, but the number nearly tripled to 405 in 1945 and continues to
rise into the 1950s. In 1953 the Lathrup Townsite in the northern
part of the township incorporated as Lathrup Village, which stands to
this day as a separate municipality from Southfield proper. Northland
Center opened in 1954, further stimulating building and construction
throughout the township. Despite the township still be relatively
rural in the early 1950s, Southfield officials recognized that careful
planning was needed to manage future growth.
In 1958 the unincorporated township (minus Lathrup Village,
Franklin, and Bingham Farms) successfully voted to incorporated as a
city, improving the ability of the local government to plan and
provide for residential development. Around the same time, the
Wayne County Road Commission initiated plans to turn Southfield Road
into an expressway to handle the increased traffic at Northland and to a
new Ford Motor Company office.
Southfield's suburban growth continued throughout the second half of
the twentieth century, with the population doubling from 1960 to 1970,
making it Michigan's fastest growing city in that decade. Between 1958
and 1967, 8,300 single-family homes were built in the city, nearly 1,500
of those in 1965 alone. 31 Today, many of these older homes remain
throughout the city, creating a distinctive character throughout the
city's residential neighborhoods.

-77-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Background &amp; History

National Historic Register of Places - The Plumbrooke Estates Neighborhood
In November 1960, the City of Southfield approved the Plumbrooke
Estates subdivision and the first homes opened in May 1961, with
prices between $23,900 and $26,000. These homes were unique in
terms of their design and character, which had a cohesive mid-century
style. Today, the neighborhood still has moderate lot sizes, curved
streets, mature trees, and attractive green spaces, as well as a variety
of popular mid-century house styles, including Colonial Revival,
Ranches, and Contemporary. The houses share similar materials and
features across styles, such as stacked bond brick masonry, wide
overhanging eaves, and large windows. The quality of the houses and
distinctive design of the neighborhood led to Plumbrooke Estates being
added to the National Register of Historic Places in 2019, to be
preserved as a cultural heritage site for future generations. 32

National Historic Register of Places - The Northland
Gardens Neighborhood
Between 1956 and 1976, several developers built out the Northland
Gardens neighborhood, located in the southeast corner of the City just
north of Eight Mile Road. Nearly all homes in the neighborhood are
ranch style, and most are unaltered from their original state except for
repainting or minor repairs. Although the homes were all built at a
similar time, each one is unique because of features like porches,
breezeways, garages, awnings, and other architectural details. Most
homes in Northland Gardens have brick or other masonry facades,
occasionally incorporating wood siding on garage doors or under roof
gables. The overall cohesiveness but individual variety of the houses in
Northland Gardens led to it being National Register of Historic Places in
2020, alongside Plumbrooke Estates. 33

-78-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential C'haracter
Current Conditions

Current Conditions
This chapter provides background information on housing in Southfield and
some comparisons with historical data and the region. The evaluation serves as
a basis for the future land use plan strategies regarding housing and public
improvements to support the needs of residents.

Figure 8. Southfield Residential Permits, 1995-2021
350

150

SOURCES: The most recent census data in this chapter is from the Census

100

Bureau's 2019 American Community Survey {ACS) 5-year estimates. 2020 and
2021 census data were not used because they are not necessarily an accurate
reflection of changes in housing characteristics due to the COVJD-19
pandemic's drastic and unpredictable impacts on housing.

-e- Net Total

300

Planning for housing is critical because nearly 60% of land in the City is devoted
to residential uses. Additionally, people seeking a place to live or deciding
whether to stay in a community base their decisions in part on the
1
community s housing characteristics, such as home values and affordability.

-e-s Year Average

250
200

so
0
LI')

-50

en
en

...-i

Housing Units

,-....

en
en
...-i

en
en
en
...-i

...-i

0
0

N

m

0
0

LI')

,-....

0
0

0
0

N

N

N

en

m

...-i

0

...-i

0

0

...-i

...-i

Ll'I,-....

...-i

en

...-i

N

0

0

0

0

0

...-i

NNNNNNN

Source: US Census Bureau ACS

According to the Census Bureau, a housing unit may be a house, apartment,
mobile home, group of rooms, or single room that is intended for occupancy by
families or individuals who live separately from other families or individuals in
the building and have direct access from outside the building or through a
11
common hall. A "family is a group of related individuals, which may or may
not include up to 5 unrelated individuals, that live in the same unit.
The number of new construction housing units in Southfield has been
drastically decreasing since 1995, while population and household growth have
decreased only slightly. Figure 8 shows the annual net number of residential
building permits steeply decreased by 277 permits from 1995 to 2010, rose
again briefly in 2010 and 2017, and then dropped off in 2018. Since 2018, the
number of new permits has been steadily increasing, a trend in part owed to
the recent redevelopment of older homes and buildings into new housing
units. Figure 9 shows that the number of housing units has been rising steadily
since 1990, a trend indicative of increased multi-unit development, which only
requires one permit for multiple housing units.
-79-

Figure 9. Southfield Housing Units &amp; Occupancy, 1990-2019

-e- Occupied Units
40,000
38,000
36,000
34,000
32,000
30,000
28,000

- - -Total Units

.~

37626

35054

35698

-

36257

■

1990

2000

2010

2014

Source : US Census Bureau ACS

37411
■

2019

�-- -

Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Conditions

Occupancy
Housing occupancy is the percentage of total housing units that are occupied at
any given time. Occupancy can be an indicator of housing stability, with high
occupancy generally indicating a stable or growing residential housing market.
Because Southfield has had little change population or the total number of
households over the last decade, as well as a shrinking average household size,
demand for housing overall has been on a slight decline. However, Figure 9
depicts a slight uptick in occupied housing units since 2010. This change is
reflected in the occupancy rate, which increased from 87% in 2010 to 93.1% in
2019, as shown in Figure 10. Over the same period, Oakland County also
experienced a similar increase in occupancy from 91.5% to 93.4%.
Residential construction has been relatively responsive to recent population
trends. The net number of residential building permits issued in Southfield
peaked in 1998 and has generally been declining since, mirroring the City's
population change.

Figure 10. Regional Occupancy Rate, 1990-2019

Southfield

100.0%

94.9%

-a- Oakland Co.

95.8%

95.0%
90.0%
85.0%

87.0%

80.0%
75.0%
1990

2000

2010

2014

2019

Source: US Census Bureau ACS

The occupancy percentage of apartment in Southfield is high with the average
occupancy per apartment complex being 97.3% occupied (2.7% average
vacancy). The lowest occupancy/highest vacancy rate of all the apartments in Southfield is 38% and this equates to 184 vacant units of 298 total
units being currently available for rent. This building is skewing the numbers by a whole percentage point for total City apartment unit vacancy.
The vacancy rate fluctuates each month as leases expire but the total current number of vacant apartment units (as of November 2021) in the
City of Southfield is 404 units. This is an apartment vacancy rate for the City of Southfield of approximately 3.3%. If this high vacancy building
was not included the lowest occupancy rate would be 88% and this equates to 47 units vacant of 381 total units and Southfield's occupancy rate
would be 98.3% (vacancy of 1.7%). The current state of the City of Southfield's apartment market has approximately 12,120 total apartment
units, not including senior/assisted living.

-80-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Conditions

Certain neighborhoods have more vacant housing units than others. These neighborhoods may face challenges like a housing stock in various
states of repair and low interest in homes relative to home prices. Identifying the location of those neighborhoods helps in addressing their
issues and reducing vacancies. The areas with highest vacancies can be seen in Map 5. These areas are generally within the Regal Towers
Apartment complex near Franklin and Eleven Mile Roads, in Section 34 bounded by Eight Mile, Lahser, Evergreen, and Nine Mile Roads, just east
of Inkster Road between Ten and Eleven Mile Roads, the south half of Section 15, and around the Southfield DDA district.

Map 5. Southfield Vacancy Rates, 2014-2019

7... ..,.. . .

u"(+/-J4l

z.u, (+/• 2A"J

Vacancy Rate
% of Housi ng Units that are Vacant
o.n (+/· 0.a,ij

0.4% - 5%
'----'

'C

1."'(+/- 3,q

4.S"f+/· S-"')

U" (+/· J.nl

Source: US Census Bureau ACS

-81-

5.01% - 10%
10.01% · 15.6%

(+/- Margin of Error)

�Chaplet· 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Conditions

Home Ownership
Home ownership is the single largest factor in the generation of wealth for individuals and families, especially low-income families (HUD, 2004).
Like occupancy rates, the percentage of owner-occupied housing units can be an indicator of housing stability.
In 2019, approximately 46% of Southfield residents owned their residence while approximately 54% rented, and the home ownership rate has
been declining slightly over the last decade. As Figure 11 shows, home ownership rates are significantly lower in Southfield than in Oakland
County, which can be attributed in part to the City's large proportion of multiple-family residential units, particularly apartments. Home
ownership is declining most likely due to rising housing costs (noted below) and decreasing median household incomes.
While many people are happy with their ownership arrangement, a notable segment of Americans want the opposite of what they currently
have. More than 8 in 10 Michigan homeowners are content with their housing situation, but only 5.7 in 10 renters are satisfied with their current
housing. 34 In a 2017 survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, 72% of renters said they would like to own a home at some point. 35
However, researchers also estimate that around 17-20% of people want to rent rather than own for a variety of reasons - more flexibility, less
maintenance, and a lesser need for space are just a few of those reported. 36
Figure 11. Regional Home Ownership Rate, 1990-2019

Southfield

Oakland Co.

100.0%
90.0%
80.0%

72.7%

74.7'7o

53.9'7o

54.1%

· --

71.4%

-- -

70.0%

---

71.7%

70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%

53.5%

48.6%

45.6%

30.0%
20.0%
10.0%

.--

0.0%
1990

2000

2010

Source : US Census Bureau ACS

-82-

2014

2019

~-

�--,
Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Conditions

Certain neighborhoods in Southfield are experiencing lower homeownership rates than others. These areas are generally less stable because the
residents can more easily move out of the neighborhood. Many of these neighborhoods have high numbers of multiple-family units. These
areas are highlighted in Map 6 and include the areas around Northland, northeast of the Telegraph/1-696 interchange; along Shiawassee east of
Beech; between Telegraph and Lahser; the City Centre; and along 1-696 on the City's eastern edge.

Map 6. Homeownership Rates by Neighborhood, 2014-2019

&amp;.nt
1.0% (+/-4.1")

'-~,

~

W .11'Mff11Rd -

Homeownership Rate

"\

% Owner-Occupied Housing Units

C7

n.n (+/· 7.4")

Source: US Census Bureau ACS

-83-

3.2% - 41%

w

41.01% · 64%

-

64.01% - 100%

(+/- Margin of Error)

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Conditions

Housing Costs
Figure 12. Southfield Median Housing Values, 1990-2019

The cost of housing, combined with income and the cost of transportation,
determines housing affordability. Over the last five years owner-occupied
housing has been getting more expensive in Southfield, after previously
seeing a drop-off in 2010 following the Foreclosure Crisis. According to the
US Census Bureau, the median value of owner-occupied homes in Southfield
was $171,900 in 2019, up dramatically from $114,100 in 2014. The overall
rising cost of housing, depicted in Figure 12, makes it difficult for potential
home buyers to enter the housing market. However, the recent rise in
occupancy rates since 2010 as noted above may hint that the rise in housing
prices be in part due to rising demand .

$200,000

$171,900
$155,400

$150,000

$100,000

$114,100

$114,700

$50,000

Value
$0

Housing values were on a steady rise from 2014 to 2019, but experienced a
dramatic jump with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite a decline
in overall inventory, homes throughout Michigan are selling for higher
prices than ever. 37 In 2014, most homes in Southfield were valued around
$50,000 to $199,000. But by 2019, home values had risen so quickly that
most homes were valued around $100,000 to $299,000, with a median
value of $171,900, as shown in Figure 13. Today, the median listing price is
estimated to be even higher at $225,500. 38 Since 2010, this is a notable
change in distribution when values were much more evenly distributed.

r

1990

2000

2010

2014

2019

Sources: US Census Bureau ACS, SEMCOG

Figure 13. Southfield Housing Values, 2014 vs 2019

$1,000,000 or more
$500,000 to $999,999

i
:■

$300,000 to $499,999
$200,000 to $299,999
$150,000 to $199,999
$100,000 to $149,999
$50,000 to $99,999
Less than $50,000
0

1,000
2019

Source : US Census Bureau ACS

-84-

2,000
■

2014

3,000

4,000

5,000

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Cur.r ent Conditions

Rent
Southfield has a large supply of rental housing, particularly when compared
with the Metro Detroit area. Figure 14 shows that in 2019, rental housing
comprised approximately 54% of Southfield's occupied housing units,
compared to just 28% in Oakland County and 30% in the metro area . Further,
the share of rental housing in Southfield increased from 2014 while only
minimally increasing in the County and decreasing in the metro area.
As the share of rental units increases, a higher percentage of households are
impacted by rental rates. In 2019, median gross rents for Southfield residents
were significantly higher than for residents in Oakland County in every rent
bracket except $1,000 to $1,499 per month. The median gross rent Southfield
residents paid in 2019 was $1,133, compared to only $1,104 in the County and
$962 in the metro area. Figure 15 shows the distribution of gross rent paid by
residents of Southfield compared to those of Oakland County and the metro
area. Southfield households pays higher rents than in the County and metro
area.
The average low rent per unit for an apartment building in Southfield is $1,049
per unit. The average high rent per unit for an apartment building is 1,271. The
lowest rent commanded in the apartment market in Southfield is $554 per
month and is for a 490 square foot studio apartment in McDonnell Towers. The
highest rent commanded in the City of Southfield's apartment market is $3,200
per month and is for a four-bedroom, 1,711 square foot room in Arbor Lofts.
The average rent per square foot of living space in the City of Southfield is $1.29
and the median is $1.19. This rent is being asked for by The Park at Trowbridge
which has an exceptionally high vacancy rate, the highest vacancy rate in the
City. The lowest rental rate per square foot of living area is $0.68 per square
foot. This rent is being asked for by The Oxley Apartments and they have a
100% occupancy rate. Today, the apartment market in Southfield is strong and
supply is low and unable to keep up with demand.

Figure 14. Regional Residential Rental Share, 2014 vs 2019
60.0%

54.4%

51.4%

50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
2014

o Southfield

2019

■

Metro Detroit

Source: US Census Bureau ACS

Figure 15. Regional Gross Rent, 2019
50.0%
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%

Southfield

&lt;:::,&lt;:::,
~

r..t:i

;s-

P&gt;°'

~

ot:i

~

'J&gt;y

""
...,e

&lt;:::,c::,

t:i'V

&lt;:::&gt;c::,

t:i'?

~

?&gt;°'

~

o~

~

&lt;;:,c::,

t:i&lt;-5

?&gt;°'

~

ot:i

~

~

otj

~

c::,&lt;::S

t:i"&gt;-'

?&gt;°' 0~e
~
I'..."&gt;-' 0~~

0-.,,

c~

~c::,

~

Source : US Census Bureau ACS

-85-

■

Oakland Co.

&lt;;:,c::,

&lt;,

t:i"&gt;-'

■

Oakland

■

Metro
Detroit

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Conditions

Household Income

Figure 16. Regional Rent as a Percentage of Household
Income, 2019

As noted in Chapter 2: Key Recent Changes and Trends, the median household
income declined slightly between 2000 and 2010 and was lower than that of
Oakland County for the entire period . When combined with increasing rents,
Southfield renters should be spending a higher portion of their income on rent
which is reflected accordingly. As Figure 16 shows, the portion of income
spent on rent is generally comparable in Southfield and in the County, except
for those at the very far ends of the spectrum. The largest discrepancy occurs
in the 35% or more category, where more Southfield residents are putting a
larger amount of the monthly income toward rent than Oakland County
residents. This may be related to the poverty rate in Southfield, which is higher
than in the rest of the County.

■

50.0%
~

Southfield

■

Oakland Co .

40.0%

cu

1:
30.0%
cu

!0

20.0%

~

10.0%
0.0%
Less
than
15.0

Housing Types

15.0 to 20.0 to 25 .0 to 30.0 to 35 .0 or
19.9
24.9
29 .9
34.9
more
% of Household Income

Source : US Census Bureau ACS

Single-family detached residences comprise the largest share of residential
housing in Southfield. In 2019, these types of housing structures comprised
nearly 50% of all residences. The next most prevalent housing type was
multiple-family structures with 20 or more units, which comprised almost a
quarter of the housing stock. However, relative to the surrounding County and
metro area, detached single-family residential homes comprised a lower
portion of Southfield's total housing units, as shown in Figure 17. According to
the 2019 American Community Survey, Southfield has an approximate 22%
lower share of single-family residential units and a much larger share of
multiple-family residential units compared to Oakland County and metro
Detroit. In particular, the share of large (i.e., containing 20 or more units)
multi-family structures in Southfield are about 4 times that of the County or
metro area .
Many of these structures are apartment and condominium towers. The
presence of apartment buildings helps explain the city's high residential rental
share (noted above) and reemphasizes the impact that higher rents have on

-86-

Figure 17. Regional Residential Housing Distribution, 2019

Boat, RV, van, etc.

I

Mobile home
20 or more units

•

cu 10 to 19 units
a.
5 to 9 units

~

.2
::&gt;

■

Metro Detroit

■

Oakland Co.
Southfield

3 or 4 units
2 units

1-unit, attached
1-unit, detached
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
% of Housing Units
Source : US Census Bureau ACS

�C'haJ)tcr 4: Housing and Residential Clrnrackr
Current Conditions

Southfield's large rental population. The acres of land devoted to multiplefamily residences can be a deceiving statistic, as residential densities can
vary widely within the multiple-family designation.

Figure 18. Year Built, Southfield Residential Structures, 2019
11,337
9,985

12,000
~
::, 10,000

Ill

Housing Unit Age
Southfield has a diverse mix of housing that has been developed over the
course of its history and the City's residential architecture reflects the
historical growth of the community. In the early 1950s, prior to the City's
incorporation, the Township of Southfield was home to approximately
19,000 residents, jumping to 75,000 residents by the end of the 1970s.
This explosive growth is reflected in the age of Southfield's housing stock. As
Figure 18 shows, the greatest share of existing housing units was
constructed from 1960-1979. Afterward, as the population growth
flattened, the share of new structures decreased. Only about 14% of
Southfield homes were built after 1990. Because Southfield is largely built
out, the annual number of new structures can be expected to remain low as
new development will primarily consist of redevelopment of existing land.
Over time, as newer structures replace older ones and as residential
densities increase, the share of newer housing units will begin to increase.
As the housing stock continues to age, efforts to preserve and rehabilitate
existing units will be critical in preserving property values and maintaining a
high quality of life for Southfield's residents.

Resident Length of Stay

....u
::,
....

6,732

8,000

~

2,234 11 13,440

6,000

V,

0

4,000
2,000 l,~ 2 ■
0

~

IV

.c

E
::,

z

1 1,:;0803

"'°'

. ~ o,'&gt;9 o,&lt;-;9 o,v
,2' o,,
~e

~

~e

90

o,'&gt;5
!'\..~

~f

P&gt; c:::,"Y'? e~!'\..

c:::,&lt;:S

~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
,c,.,O
,c,.,O
,c,.,O
,c,.,O
,c,.,O
,c,.,O
,c,.,O
,c,.,O
&lt;:J.''&gt;-~
~~ ~~ 9.,~ ?,~ ~~ ~~ ,c,.,O

~

-~

o,'69 o,°'?,

208

0

n~

~

-~

{')

-~

{') {')

-~

-~

~

-~

~

,,c:s ,,~

-~

-~

&lt;o" q;,v q;,v &lt;o" &lt;o" &lt;o" &lt;o" q;,v

"\,c:::,

$'

&lt;o

Year Built
Source: US Census Bureau ACS

Figure 19. Year Householder Moved In, pre-1989 to 2019
25,000
20,495

Ill

°8
.c

20,000

IV

Ill

g 15,000

-

13,197

14,881

::c

The length of time a person lives in a home is a measure of a community's
stability. In 2019, 79% of Southfield residents had moved into their home in
2000 or later, as shown in Figure 19. This trend can be explained by
Southfield's major shift in racial composition around 1990, during which
many residents moved out of and into the city, and the city's high number of
renters, who move more often than homeowners. As new housing
construction slows and prices rise, relocation options may be limited, and
householders can be expected to remain in their homes for longer durations
in the future.

~ 10,000
.c
IV

§

z

9,076
5,948

7,637

5,000
0

1989 or 1990 to 2000 to 2010 to 2015 to 2017 or
earlier 1999
2009
2014
2016
later
Year Household Moved Into Unit
Source: US Census Bureau ACS

-87-

I

J

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Housing Progra1ns

Current Housing Programs
Ongoing Housing Programs
Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8)
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides funding for its Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program, formerly
known as Section 8. The HCV Program subsidizes rent for income-qualified individuals through the Southfield Housing Commission. As a tenantbased program, the Voucher holder is subsidized - not the rental unit. The Program is often referred to as "Finders Keepers" because the family
must locate a unit that meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) established by HUD.

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The City of Southfield receives CDBG funds annually from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Fund allocations are
based on development of viable urban communities by providing proper housing and a suitable living environment and by expanding economic
opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. The CDBG program allows the City of Southfield to develop and implement
activities and projects that are uniquely suited and beneficial to Southfield residents within the framework of federal guidelines.
As required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), each activity funded with CDBG monies must meet one of the three
national objectives:
1.

Benefit persons of low and moderate income (see Map 7 on the proceeding page for City-wide eligible areas)

2.

Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; and/or

3.

Resolve an urgent need or serious and immediate threat to health and welfare of the community where other financial resources are not
available.

The City of Southfield's CDBG HUD Entitlement of $411,507 for Fiscal Year 21-22 (July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022) is allocated to the following
programs, as shown in Table 2. CDBG Funds Expenditures.

-88-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current 1-lom,ing Programs
Table 2 . CDBG Funds Expenditures

. .
Descnpt1on

Program
CDBG Program Administration
-

Fair House
--- ---HAVEN

..----- - -

----------

--- ------

Administrative costs for running the CDBG program.
Expenditures include wages, supplies, legal notices, etc.
Promotes equal and fair housing through the Fair Housing
Center of Metropolitan Detroit
Provides services related to domestic violence

d d
Amount Expen e

Amount
All
d
ocate
$85,291

$3,746

$1,955

$1,955

$1,500

$1,500
$1,500

South Oakland Shelter
(Lighthouse)

Provides services to residents for counseling, emergency
shelter, food distribution, housing assistance, and support

$1,500

Southfield Youth Assistance
(SYA)

Provides low-income youth scholarship funds for skill-building
education, recreational programs, camps, etc.

$18,665

$8,854

Emergency Relief Fund (ERF)

Provides interim care to low/moderate income residents to
prevent evictions,
utility shut offs, and pay for food, medication, etc.
Provides funds to low/moderate income homeowners to
repair their homes. Typical improvements include roofs,
furnaces, and sewer connections

$19,190

$0

~~

~

Southfield Home Improvement
Program (SHIP)- home repair
program

Entitlement
funds: $81,670

' Entitlement funds:
$62,194

Program income
funds: $160,023

Program income
funds: $32,072

Rebuilding Together

Aids low/moderate income families with home improvements

$29,040

$5,000

CHORE Program

Provides assistance to low/moderate income older adults with
funds for minor home repair
----Provides affordable public transportation to senior adult
residents
Provides funds to eliminate blight through code enforcement.

$145,130

$104,116

$24,630

$24,630

$29,040
----$666,647

$29,040
$379,258.61

-

_L_

Transportation of Southfield
Seniors
--~
Blight Code Enforcement
Total

-- -

--

'

--- - ---

-·

- -- -

----

--

_.._ _ _

.__

----- --- - -

-89-

_..

--•

-- -- --

l

1

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Housing Programs

Map 7. CDBG Low-Mod Eligible Areas

5
2

2

\:-

160

3

160
3

66 .88%

•_ _ _161
2

1603

CJ Ccmus Tnca
3

C=:J Census Block Cf-cups

2

HUD Low to Mod Pct

2

61 .u•

Block Groups

r---.__-1611 _ _ _....

55.36%

Sl .48

~ L--Mod Pct &gt; 51 ~

615
3

2

2

2
3

161

1619
I

0

0

2

69.83%

I

0.]5

1Wes
I I I

I

I

05

162'1
2
:.owe.. HUD
~

-90-

Lew.-~._

O-, i.u.4- !011.l!OIS AC:.

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Housing Programs

The Southfield Home Improvement Program (SHIP)
SHIP is a low-interest loan program for income qualified homeowners, funded through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program. The focus of the program concentrates on maintenance of the existing structure as it relates to health and safety issues and minimum
housing standards. The City pays for the repair and the cost of the repair is established as a lien on the house, which is then repaid to the city at
the time the house is sold. Typical types of improvements include roofs, windows, doors, siding, insulation, heating, electrical, and plumbing
repairs. The City of Southfield also participates in efforts to reduce lead-based paint hazards but does not participate in remodeling or updating
for cosmetic purposes, nor constructing additions or new structures.

CHORE
The City of Southfield's CHORE program has been helping older adults maintain their homes since its inception in 1983. Funded through the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), CHORE provides an annual spending account for each income qualified senior adult household to
be used for labor associated with lawn care, snow removal, window and gutter cleaning, minor plumbing, furnace, and electrical repairs.
However, the CDBG funding for the CHORE program has been reduced over the last five years, leading to a slight decline in program
participation.

MSHDA
The Michigan State Housing and Development Authority (MSHDA) offers low-interest loan programs that give lower income people an
opportunity to buy their first home.

The Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP)
The NSP was established for the purpose of stabilizing communities that have suffered from foreclosures and abandonment through the
purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed and abandoned homes and residential properties. The NSP is a component of the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. NSP funds are to be used for activities that include, but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•

Establishing financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed homes and residential properties
Purchasing and rehabilitating homes and residential properties abandoned or foreclosed
Establishing land banks for foreclosed homes
Demolishing blighted structures
Redeveloping demolished or vacant properties

NSP grantees can use their discretion to develop their own programs and funding priorities. However, at least 25 percent of NSP funds must be
used for the purchase and redevelopment of abandoned or foreclosed homes or residential properties that will be used to house individuals or

-91-

�ChaJ)tcr 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Housing Programs

families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of the area median income. In addition, all activities funded by the NSP must benefit low- and
moderate-income persons whose incomes do not exceed 120 percent of area median income.
The Southfield City Council authorized the incorporation of the Southfield Growth Corporation (SGC) in 2009. The SGC is the administrative
entity responsible for the day-to-day management of NSP and is operated by volunteers. To-date, the NSP program has used most of the initial
grant award but around $60,0000 remains and the SGC continues to acquire dilapidated houses as they present themselves. SGC anticipates that
it will acquire several new homes in 2022 when the Oakland County tax foreclosures open.

The Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative {SNRI)
The SNRI is a partnership between Southfield City Council, Southfield Non-Profit Housing Corporation (SNHC), and Habitat for Humanity Oakland
County. SNHC pays back taxes, water bills, and fees, and finances renovation costs for acquired homes. The SNRI contracts with Habitat for
Humanity to renovate homes, perform environmental studies, bring houses up to current building codes, and sell the homes at market value,
thus raising property values. Property sale proceeds go back to the Southfield Non-Profit Housing Board. The SNRI also funds the SF Community
Development program, which is funded by the SGC and funds the construction of new and conversion of existing buildings to be sold as marketrate homes and condos. The former McKinley school is one of the program's most prominent projects, which is being converted into numerous
condos targeted toward young professionals and empty nesters.

-92-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Housing Programs

Southfield Non-Profit Housing Corporation (SNHC) Housing Units
In addition to the SNRI, the SNHC operates four multi-family rental complexes targeted toward older adults and people with disabilities. In total,
the SNHC offers 504 affordable units between the River Park Place Townhomes and Apartments, McDonnell Tower Apartments, and the
Woodridge Apartments. 39

Ongoing Housing-Related Programs
Neighborhood Associations
The City encourages the creation of, and coordination with, neighborhood 3ssociations and organizations, including condominium associations.
Such organizations can coordinate with the City and develop improvement and organizational strategies that apply to their neighborhood, such
as a neighborhood watch program. Neighborhood organizations can also work with the City to set up Special Assessment Districts (SAD) for
infrastructure and streetscape improvements, such as road and sidewalk maintenance, the installation of rain barrels and rain gardens, and
decorative street lighting. The City, through the Southfield Parks and Garden Club, currently issues "Community Pride Awards." Awards are
granted to reward individuals, condominium associations, apartment complexes, and neighborhoods for their efforts to maintain, improve, or
beautify their neighborhood or development.

Semi-Annual Neighborhood Beautification Programs (Clean-up Programs)
The City currently hosts annual clean-up days, which allows residents to dispose of unwanted items. The spring clean-up offers residents the
option to dispose of household items, and the fall hazardous waste clean-up day offers them the option to dispose of products that cannot be
sent to the landfill. The Big Rake is another annual clean-up hosted through the CHORE program, which partners with Lawrence Tech students to
volunteer to clean up older adults' leaves each fall.
The Rock the Block partnership program with Habitat for Humanity, sponsored by private industry, also provides minor repair services for lowincome older adults, such as repainting home exteriors, repairing gutters, and replanting lawn beds. The Oakland Rebuilding Together program is
also partially funded through the City's CDBG and provides more extensive renovations to select homes.

Entranceway Program
The Southfield Entranceway Program is a beautification program which funds neighborhood and condominium entranceway improvements.
Administered by the NIC, the City will provide matching funds at a 2-to-1 ratio to a maximum of $1,000 for the construction of new entryway
signage. Many Southfield neighborhoods either have no signage or deteriorated signage, and do not have the resources to pay for new signage

-93-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Current Housing Programs

alone, which can run as high as $2,000 for a small sign. The City launched the Entranceway Program in 2020 to beautify the city and help
neighborhoods establish a distinct character and pride of place.

Safe Routes to School Program
In 2016, Southfield received a $600,000 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) grant from the Michigan Department of Transportation for the installation
for new sidewalks near schools. The city used the funds to improve pathways near Thompson K-8 International Academy, Yeshiva Beth Yehudah,
and Beth Jacob. The grant funds were broken up into five priorities, resulting in new sidewalk infill on Southwood from Ten Mile Road to Lincoln
Road on both sides, Sherfield from Kingshire to Pierce on both sides, Fairfax from Ten Mile Road to Goldwin on both sides, as well as new
crossings with a pedestrian refuge island at Ten Mile Road west of Fairfax and 11 Mile and Fairfield Roads east of Fairfax. Having a safe
environment for children to walk and play not only makes neighborhoods healthier, but also more welcoming to young families. As such, the
SRTS grant has helped Southfield improve neighborhood safety and overall desirability over the last five years.

-94-

�Chapter 4: Housh1g and Residential Character
Current Housing Programs

RUDD Sites
The purpose of Residential Unit Development Districts (RUDD)
is to encourage the use of land in accordance with its
character and ada ptability; promoting adaptive reuse and
preservation of former school buildings and sites; foster green
infrastructure and conserving natural resources, natural
features, and energy; encouraging innovation in land use
planning; providing enhanced housing, employment, traffic
circulation and recreational opportunities for the residents of
Southfield. At present, two former school sites are being
redeveloped with the use of the RUDD tool: the McKinley and
John Grace schools, as shown in Map 8 (for more information,
please see the Adaptive Reuse section below or Chapter 5:
Economic Development).

Map 8. RUDD Sites in Southfield

LEGEND

Q

Sites that have RUDD rezoning approval
Sites eligible for RUDD

0
II
8 MI

©
•.

-95-

nn

•

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

Key Trends &amp; Challenges
Short-Term Rentals
A "Short-Term Rental Unit" typically refers to a house, apartment, or other type of housing unit that is rented for 30 consecutive days or less by
persons other than the permanent resident or owner. Across the Unites States, short-term rental services like Airbnb and VRBO have taken off in
the last few years, growing by nearly 800% between 2011 and 2017. 40 Short-term rentals are especially controversial in Michigan, where
legislation over their operations is currently being debated by the State Senate. In 2021, the State House introduced and passed House Bill 4722,
which would allow short-term rentals as a permitted use by-right in all residential zoning districts in all municipalities across the state. The bill
would also prohibit local municipalities from adopting or enforcing zoning ordinance provisions that have the effect of prohibiting short-term
rentals. 41 While some residents see this bill as a beneficial economic stimulus measure that would allow people to raise their annual incomes,
other see it as a threat to neighborhood stability, character, and property values due to the frequent changes in tenants. Many municipalities are
currently working on creative ways to manage short-term rentals outside of zoning, such as creating a short-term rental registry and broadening
local nuisance ordinances. As of July 2020, there were estimated to be 61 short-term rental units in Southfield, mostly comprised of single-family
homes.

Age-in-Place Housing
Providing appropriate senior housing options that are safe, attractive, and stimulating is increasingly important as the general population ages.
Fewer financial resources are available to older residents, and so they need affordable options that are . Right now, Michigan has more than 2
million adults over age 60, accounting for nearly 25% of the state's population. As people live longer on average, residents 85 and older remain
the fastest-growing age group.42 As such, many municipalities across the state are launching initiatives to find ways for residents to comfortably
age-in-place, either by modifying their existing homes to be accessible or by providing more housing options, such as apartments, duplexes, and
assisted living facilities. Presently, the SNHC operates four affordable multi-family rental complexes targeted toward older adults: the River Park
Place Townhomes, River Park Place Apartments, McDonnell Tower Apartments, and Woodridge Apartments. Additionally, there are
approximately 18 privately-owned assisted living facilities of varying sizes operating within the city limits.
The inner-ring suburbs of Detroit, including Southfield, face a particular challenge when it comes to providing new age-friendly housing: limited
land . When the nearby City of Huntington Woods conducted its Senior Amenities and Lifestyle Analysis in 2020, it found that only approximately
2% of the land in the City was immediately available for the construction of new housing. As such, the City had to think creatively about ways to
adapt existing housing to assist with aging-in-place. Some of these ideas included creating a floating zoning district that accommodates more
accessible lot layouts and floors plans, and amending the zoning code to allow accessory dwelling units and garage conversions. 43 Although the
City of Southfield is not as limited in land availability as many of its neighbors, similar challenges with age -in-place housing are likely to arise as
the population continues to trend older in the future .

-96-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Key Trends&amp;. Challenges

"Missing" Middle Housing
"Missing Middle Housing" is a term that encompasses all the housing types that residents want to live in but do not currently exist in a
community, usually because they are not provided for the zoning ordinance and/or master plan. Common missing middle housing types in older
Michigan communities, which typically have a high number of single-family homes, include duplexes, fourplexes, cottage courts, second-floor
apartments above commercial businesses, and multiplexes. These types of housing are generally compatible with the character of existing
single-family residential neighborhoods and can work to support walkability, provide locally serving retail, and improve access to public
transportation options. They can also provide a range of affordability to address the discrepancy between the cost of available housing stock and
the prices people can afford. 44 As such, many municipalities are filling in the missing middle portions of their zoning codes by creating new
residential or mixed-use zoning districts that provide for one or more of these missing middle types by-right.
Today, multi-family housing is provided throughout the City of Southfield in a variety of forms. The most common type is apartment-style
housing, characterized by larger parking lots and buildings with few entrances. Some complexes include a grouping of smaller multi-family
homes, which may or may not have individual entrances. More modern approaches to multi-family housing include townhomes and singlefamily attached and low-rise condominiums, which are becoming more desirable to those looking for high-quality housing with low maintenance
requirements, particularly younger residents, retirees, or those whose families are reducing in size.

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Tiny
Homes

VERTED GARAGE

CON

Accessory dwelling units (ADUs), also known as granny
flats, mother-in-law apartments, or carriage houses,
are housing units that are constructed on the same
parcel as an existing primary residence, such as a
single-family home. ADUs might be in an accessory
building, such as a converted garage or new
construction, or attached to the primary residence,
such as a converted living space, attached garage, or an
addition.

-

J

DETACHED A DU

~11!.l.ll/ ., ~~

0'1441 'l~7; .~17

~~51 ,.amIJ/@_@),ffl

1

"About 25% of new households prefer condos and urban townhomes.

ATTACHED ADU

-=

11

(Shaping the City: Seeking a new template for truly smart growth. By Roger K. Lewis, published April 22, 2011, The Washington Post)

-97-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Key Trends &amp; Challenge~

At the height of the suburbanization, communities favored low-density development defined by
large-lot single-family homes and ADUs that were once a common were excluded from zoning
codes. However, growing demand for affordable housing, combined with limited land, has led to
changing attitudes about the use and development of ADUs. Municipalities have consistently
found that ADUs are a cheap, easy way to increase the number of housing options while also
meeting the needs of older adults, empty-nesters, and young working professionals, many of
whom are priced out of traditional homeownership. They also provide rental income for
homeowners, giving people a way to "cash in" on the equity of their home without having to sell
it. AD Us are also one of the most affordable options for both individuals and cities (if offered
financial assistance) because they are often simple conversions, do not require the purchase of
new land, and are on lots that are already services by utilities.45
Tiny homes are related to ADUs but may or may not be an ADU themselves. Tiny homes are
houses that are 600 square feet or less, although some are as small as 250 square feet. They can
occupy a lot all by themselves or be on a lot with an existing home (which would make them an
ADU), and they may be connected to municipal energy and water or be off-the-grid. Tiny homes
are constructed from a variety of materials - wood, metal panels, former shipping containers and are often movable by trailer hitch, although some are permanent fixtures.

Adaptive Reuse
Adaptive reuse is a specific form of redevelopment that, in recent decades, has driven the
revitalization of historic neighborhoods around the world. Adaptive reuse refers to a specific
variety of redevelopment that makes use of existing building stock for the purposes of
contemporary living. The adaptive reuse process involves the renovation of an existing building,
whereas renovation stops at freshening and refinishing a building for its original purpose.
Adaptive reuse implies a transformation of use; vacant office buildings have been adapted into
residential buildings, industrial warehouses into co-workspaces, and more.
There are four major adaptive reuse projects in Southfield as of January 2022. These projects
are listed below and explained in detail in Chapter 5: Economic Development.
•
•
•
•

Arbor Lofts
The Alcove
Former John Grace School
Former McKinley School

-98-

�■

Chapter 4: 'H ousing and Residential Character
- Key Trends &amp; Challenges

Expansion of Residential Offerings in Single-Family Zones
Across the nation, local and state governments are making legislative changes to increase the number of residential offerings in single-family
residential zoning districts. While many other zoning districts allow for multiple types of homes, businesses, or other developments, singlefamily zoning districts have always stood apart as being uniquely restrictive . To help address a housing shortage, Minneapolis became the first
large American city to expand the offerings in its single-family zoning districts by allowing up to 3 housing units (a tri-plex} to be built on any
single-family residential lot. The change did not eliminate the right to construct or maintain single-family homes in these districts, but simply
expanded the variety of allowed uses in the lower density zones across the city. The local dimensional requirements for residences, such as
setbacks, landscaping coverage, lot coverage, and height, ensure that the new triplexes are in keeping with the design and character of existing
neighborhoods and fit seamlessly alongside detached homes. 46
In 2019, Oregon also became the first state to require that triplexes, duplexes, and town homes be allowed in any residential zone where a
single-family home is allowed . By September of 2021, the City of Ben, Oregon, became the first municipality with over 25,000 residents to
comply with the statewide legislation. 47 Since then, dozens more cities across the United States have revised their single-family zoning district
regulations to allow for a broader variety of housing types, both to alleviate shortages and provide the "missing middle" housing that is desired
by residents.
Public Input survey respondents recognize the changing concept of what has historically been considered a "home ." In fact, 62% of respondents
indicated that they would be open to new and innovative forms of housing within their respective neighborhoods that are affordable, shared,
eco-friendly, flexible, stylish, and/or healthy. Forty-four percent (44%} of respondents are in support of duplexes and tiny homes in their
neighborhoods but they were a bit more wary of the possibility of triplexes with only 32% indicating that they have a high level of comfort. An
overwhelming number of respondents were in support of Zoning Ordinance amendments permitting Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs} (69%} and
encouraging adaptive reuse of underutilized buildings (74%}.

20-Minute Neighborhoods
A 20-minute neighborhood is an active, safe, walkable, convenient, mostly residential neighborhood where people can get most of their day-today goods and services within a 20-minute walk. 20-minute neighborhoods have existing since the 1930s, when the idea of the "neighborhood
unit" - a self-contained neighborhood that included homes, a school, a commercial district, a post office, and a park - fiist emerged . This idea
was often lost during post-war housing development, which resulted in suburban neighborhoods where residents must drive to reach all their
basic amenities. As such, many cities, including Detroit, are taking steps to implement 20-minute neighborhoods in areas that are lacking grocery
stores, healthcare, shopping, drug stores, and other necessities. This has proven a challenge in Detroit, where the housing density is often too
low to support neighborhood amenities or schools but has found success in other more populated places. 48
The City of Southfield is actively working to develop more 20-minute neighborhoods throughout the city by ensuring that new residential
development is located near existing, or includes new, commercial, or public amenities. One area targeted for 20-minute neighborhood
development is the Ten Mile Road corridor between Southfield Road and Greenfield Road, which currently has several under-utilized lots that
-99-

�...
Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

are currently vacant or over-parked. Because the corridor has existing residential homes along the center stretch with commercial development
capping both ends, it was identified as an ideal location for mixed-use development.

Lower Parking Requirements
Many cities across the Unites States have recently turned a critical eye to the amount of parking that they require be built with new
developments. Many municipalities have minimum parking requirements that reflect parking needs during the peak of auto ownership in the
mid-20th century but are now outdated and do not reflect modern transportation needs. Additionally, developers are keen to reduce the cost of
new construction, of which municipally-required over-parking is a large component. In 2017, Buffalo, New York, became the first major city to
completely remove minimum parking requirements. Projects larger than 5,000 square feet will still require a parking analysis that factors in
alternative transportation options in the area and incorporates the most up-to-date national parking standards for the project's particular use. 49
Overall, this change reflects the growing trend away from parking minimums toward parking maximums, which encourage more efficient
development that meets the needs of people walking, biking, or taking transit, as well as people using their own cars. Additionally, parking
adjustments can free up land by allowing existing businesses to sell off the unused portions of their parking lots for redevelopment, increasing
the overall supply of land in constrained communities.
Furthermore, the future growth of the ridesharing and autonomous vehicle industries is expected to lower the overall demand for parking space.
In a future with significant use of shared autonomous vehicles, parking space need could fall as much as 83%. 50 Additionally, a 2019 study at the
University of Colorado found that ride-hailing is replacing driving trips and could reduce parking demand, particularly at land uses such as
airports, event venues, restaurants, and bars.51

Supply Chain Shortages During the Pandemic
The ongoing shortage of housing materials and housing units is rising, in part because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC or Freddie Mac) estimates that the shortage of total housing units has increased by 52% from 2018 to today, with
an even more pronounced shortage of entry-level homes that are affordable to first-time buyers. Even pre-pandemic, the share of entry-level
homes in construction declined from 40% in the early 1980s to around 7% in 2019 .
The U.S. is currently experiencing an increase in housing demand during the pandemic because people are spending more time at home. This
high demand has exacerbated the shortage and caused home prices to rise over 12% between 2020 and 2021. The combination of low supply
and high demand is causing entry-level prices to rise rapidly, which is triggering affordability issues for buyers of all income levels. 52

-100-

�■

1
Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
·
Kt•y Findings

Key Findings
Strengths &amp; Opportunities
Outdated Housing Redevelopment
Many neighborhoods in Southfield are comprised of small houses, typically less than 1,000 square feet and on smaller lots. These homes are
outdated and do not offer many of the amenities desired by today's home buyers. In particular, the residential houses along 12 Mile and
Greenfield Roads are ideal for redevelopment, as has already been happening to similar homes along Twelve Mile Road in the neighboring
municipalities of Berkeley and Huntington Woods. Through creative code and design guideline changes, the City could facilitate home
expansions in these neighborhoods, as well as encourage the gradual redevelopment of smaller aluminum/vinyl siding homes and homes on
slabs. Any redevelopment should be initiated by property owners and driven by the market, with the City's role as facilitating or assisting the
homeowners.

Residential Traffic Safety
The perception of "neighborhood livability" is strongly influenced by such factors as
traffic volumes and speeds. Traffic calming, street layout, and architectural
requirements can all enhance safety in a neighborhood. In 2022, the City launched its
pilot traffic calming program, which is being launched in neighborhoods that have
problems with cut-through traffic. If successful, this pilot program presents a key
opportunity for the City to
justify the launch of a full-scale
traffic calming program,
ultimately making
neighborhoods safer,
enco11raging neighbor
interactions, and increasing
overall awareness of the street.
For more on the pilot program,
see Chapter 8: Public
Infrastructure.

-101-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Key findings

Map 9. Pilot Speed Bump Locations
W 13 Mlle R d - - ~ - ~ -- -- - - - .

J\,o'l

~"'e.s:

le~

W12 Mile Rd

,,ly~

~
Ill

CD

'C

en

Ill

~

0

u

0

..J

~

~

Winchester

~,,+4

tJl

~

')1)()'

0

~

Label

II)

~

GI

ii:
Catalpa Or

;o
a.

W 11 Mlle Rd

1-696

---'---'

- .. -

-

·- -- •

Street

1

Greenview Rd

2

Midway Rd

3

Pierce St

4

Ranchwood Dr

5

Southwood Dr

~

[ill
'0

a::

'0

Civic Center Dr
'ti

~

·

-

Spn:d llump Locations

"ii
c;::
C

GI

e

a::
'ti

C)

'i
s:.

I&amp;:

W 10 Mile Rd

"0

~

c8

a::

...

GI

'lii

'0

~

a::

'0

.5

a::
s:.
u
II)

4i

a::

s:.

e
ea

Cl)

j

•
m

'C@

U)

e

•
ii:

Mount Vernon St

C
GI

'To

GI

~
W9 Mlle Rd
'ti

a::
s:.

a.

!!Cl)

s1,,a~

ct-,.,

GI

ee~&lt;:I

~

0)

"t
U)

~
1
'0

'iii

~---------~~
c;::

=
:::,

WBMlleRd

-- ---------•----~-~~

-102-

It

�1
Chapter 4: Housing and Rt•sidential Character
Key Findings

Reuse of School Sites
The City of Southfield has been working with the Southfield Public School administration to come up with appropriate and context sensitive
redevelopment plans, including housing options, for closed and vacant school buildings and sites. As mentioned under the adaptive reuse
section above, two current former school sites undergoing planning review utilizing the RUDD tool:
•
•

Former McKinley School
Former John Grace

Continuing these efforts presents a major opportunity for Southfield to make additional land available for development, which would continue
to alleviate the challenges of limited land supply. Additional school buildings may also be sold in the future as the population ages and
attendance declines, presenting more possibilities for redevelopment. Other school sites for potential future missing middle housing, depending
on the needs of the school district, may include :
•
•
•
•
•

19080 W Twelve Mile Road (9.216 acres)
20900 Independence Drive (10 acres)
18575 W Nine Mile Road (19.26 acres)
24500 Larkin Street (10.98 acres)
17050 Dorset Ave (1.164 acres)

Neighborhood and Information Center (NIC)
As part of the Community Relations Department the City's NIC provides a link between City government and Southfield residents. For visitors,
home seekers and homeowners, the NIC is a valuable source of information about the City and one of Southfield's main strengths heading into
the future. The Center provides relocation information, welcome packets, school information, as well as information about City services and
programs. More than just an information source, the NIC serves as a liaison to City government for residents and neighborhood associations,
refers complaints to City departments and monitors their resolution, strengthens existing neighborhood associations, and reactivates dormant
ones, arranges for neighborhood association block parties, meeting rooms and mailings, and arranges yearly training and workshops for
neighborhood leaders.

Buffering Protections for Residential Uses
Some areas, including residential areas adjacent to commercial properties, may become ripe for conversion to non-residential use. In some
cases, this is a reasonable change to provide greater lot size or depth needed for certain types of modern non-residential uses. When this type
of land use change is determined to be appropriate, the City requires site design to limit conflicts with the adjacent neighbors such as:
•

Screening with brick walls or residential-style fencing supplemented by landscaping.
-103-

�Chapter 4: Housing and Residential Character
Key Findingi,

•
•
•

•

Lighting with downward directed cut-off fixtures to prevent light from spilling onto residential properties.
Locating and screening waste receptacles and loading areas to minimize noise impacts and protect views from adjoining residential
properties.
Ensuring building design incorporates architecture that enhances the quality of the neighborhood, with mechanical equipment properly
screened and setback to not create noise issues with nearby residential. In some cases, the non-residential use should be designed to
have a residential appearance in terms of scale, height, materials, and overall design.
Providing accessible pedestrian, bike, and transit connections.

These design requirements are one of the Southfield's key strengths, as they help ensure the character of residential neighborhoods and the
stability of future development by preventing nuisances.

Active Use of Home Improvement Programs
Between 2015 and 2017, $1.5 million was distributed between the SHIP and CORE programs alone. Additionally, in 2017 the SNRI program had
97 active properties and had paid out a total of $1.1 million in delinquent back-taxes. To date, the Southfield Non-Profit Housing Board has
invested over $4.5 million in home renewal. In Michigan, nearly half of homeowners and one-third of those renting do not know where to go for
housing assistance. 53 Thanks to the Mayor's Office and City's aggressive efforts to revitalize neighborhoods, many more Southfield residents are
aware of the assistance available to them than the average Michigander.

Weaknesses &amp; Threats
Lack of Age-In-Place Housing and Support Programs
The CHORE program is the City of Southfield's primary method for alleviating the housing barrier that keep older adults from aging-in-place.
Many older adults live in established neighborhoods, and some find their financial resources strained over time, leaving them to struggle to
maintain their homes. The programs that currently provide major accessibility renovations - such as access ramps, grab bars, bathroom
remodels, and lifts - are limited in scope and do not reach all older adults that require such services.

Aging Infrastructure
Well-maintained infrastructure is very important to perceived neighborhood quality. Broken sidewalks, streets with potholes, and broken
curbing all portray images of neighborhood instability, declining property values, and negatively reflect on the community. Because Southfield is
a historic inner-ring suburb, it has older infrastructure than many other suburban communities in the further reaches of the Detroit metropolitan
area. Additionally, many residential areas have widely spaced and insufficient street lighting, as well as deteriorating or missing sidewalks, that
make travel hazardous for a variety of people. Although the Safe Routes to School program addressed some of these deficiencies, many
locations with insufficient pedestrian amenities and crossings remain throughout the city.

-104-

�haptcr 4: Housing and Residential Character
Goals, Objectives, and Strategies

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies
Goals
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Make Southfield a more attractive place for younger families
Retain neighborhood character while improving the quality of homes, public facilities, and infrastructure
Support quality, safe, and affordable housing in a variety of types, sizes, locations, and costs to meet the needs of current and
future residents, regardless of age or income
Support a land use pattern and land use designations that provide for housing opportunities at varying densities and at
appropriate locations consistent with the Land use Plan
Make Southfield an age-friendly community where residents can age-in-place in their homes in comfort
Provide a diverse and stable housing stock providing for a range of housing opportunities for all income groups and a quality living
environment for all persons
Retain property values

Objectives and Strategies
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Expand the allowable uses in the single-family zoning district to include more attached housing types by-right
Provide mixed-use and higher density residential options
Eliminate Euclidian zoning where feasible
Develop Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations
Promote and provide incentives for green building and alternative energy techniques
Regulate short-term rentals (i.e., Airbnbs, VRBO, etc.)
Preserve historical and architectural character, especially our Mid-Century Modern architecture, and promote the rehabilitation
and re-use of existing structures, where feasible .
Provide affordable housing that is well maintained and meets the needs of the entire community
Seek partners and funding to increase the supply of housing for older adults, including developments that support aging in place
Promote new development that conveys a positive sense of place
Incorporate traditional, walkable, pedestrian-friendly design into new and existing residential neighborhoods through design
standards
Encourage and promote programs that help people maintain the quality and appearance of individual properties
Create pedestrian links that connect neighborhoods with each other, major community features, and regional assets
Review ordinances, codes, regulations, and permitting processes to eliminate or modify conflicting and excessive requirements
and to streamline the regulatory review process
Provide more infill housing options in the future land use plan and zoning ordinance

-105-

�vewpmen
er Family II

�Chapter 5: Economic DcYclopmcnt
Introduction

Chapter 5: Economic Development
Introduction
Southfield continues to play a vital role in supporting the State of Michigan's economy. With over 27,000,000 square feet of office space, second
in size only to Detroit's central business district, leaders from an array of industries have selected Southfield to house their global and north
American headquarters. Companies like, Veoneer, ThyssenKrupp, Marelli, Denso, Peterson Spring, Tenneco, Lear, S&amp;P Global, International
Automotive Components and Stefanini determined that Southfield offers a diverse and skilled workforce, low cost of doing business and access
to an innovate research university, Lawrence Technological University. Lawrence Tech's is known for "Theory and Practice" - taking abstract
ideas into the real world to solve tomorrow's problems. Automotive suppliers to software developers locate in Southfield to tap into the talent
found within the City Centre District.
As the "Center of It All" in Southeastern Ml, Southfield has a strategic advantage to draw companies to consolidate and expand. Our access to
highways, exceptional public services, strong fiber optic network and affordable cost of living creating a stable business environment. Our
business community is an integral part of the fabric of Southfield.
Supporting the reinvestment our people and property within the city is a necessity. As Southfield population, infrastructure, and commercial
and retail inventory age, we have experienced a steady loss of tax base and increase in vacancy. The COVID pandemic exacerbated the vacancy
of commercial and retail properties. During the on-set of the pandemic, the City of Southfield continued investing and supporting residents and
redeveloping property. We are beginning to see an uptick. The entrepreneurial spirit is thriving, and new developments and repositioning of
older properties is happening. This is signifying a positive economic shift.

-107-

�Chapter 5: Economic De\'clopmcnt
Entrepreneurial Support

Entrepreneurial Support
To invigorate the entrepreneurial spirit, the Southfield Business
Development (SBD) team (located in the Business Department) is
teaming up with proven area experts to reverse the losses seen
during the pandemic. Southfield has many components in place that
enable underserved entrepreneurs to emerge and is taking the steps
to bring back a "sense of community" for small businesses.
Education and human connection are critical components to aid the
growth of a small business. SBD is looking to create sustained,
collaborative efforts that will result in more participation and
economic prosperity for all.
The Southfield Evolution Lab, housed within the SBD Office, will
harness the passion and energy that is thriving in Southfield. The Lab
will be located at the Southfield Centrepolis Accelerator at Lawrence
Technological University (LTU), and it will offer co-working space,
networking tools, and other business amenities. Shared offices
promote networking and sharing and great places to develop new ideas, boost creativity, meet with experts, expand contacts, and foster
connections between entrepreneurs.
Target businesses for the Lab include Southfield's underserved entrepreneurs and non-Southfield underserved entrepreneurs that are willing to
relocate to Southfield. Business can receive 3 months of free rent at the Lab but must be in operation for at least 1 year, have 1-4 employees,
and have annual sales of $10,000- $100,000.
This new Lab would position the City of Southfield as a city for innovators and entrepreneurs. According to Babson College, 55% of Americans
believe they can start their own business in 2016. In Southeast Michigan, this number is even higher (57%) as there is a lower number of
entrepreneurs who are afraid of failing (21% in Detroit-metro compared to the national average of 33%). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic,
businesses faced major challenges, from access to patient capital, digital/tech resources and knowledge, and employee recruitment and
retention. There is a demand for resources, and The Southfield Entrepreneur Evolution will be the connector.

-108-

�Clrnptcr 5: Economic Development
Current Conditions

Current Conditions
Southfield
Major Industries
The City of Southfield is home to tier-one automotive suppliers, such as Tenneco, Denso, and Lear Corporation, and numerous companies
supporting the robust automotive industry in surrounding Southeast Michigan. Oakland County has some of the highest concentrations of
engineering and design workers in the nation, with skilled trades and engineering employment in the region reaching almost 200,000 in 2014.
The automotive and manufacturing industries continue to be a cornerstone of the city's local, regional, and statewide economy.
Oakland County and the City of Southfield also boast a competitive concentration of software and IT workers than that of the average US city.
Wages for IT workers in the City of Southfield are extremely competitive; starting rates average around $25 per hour for many top occupations,
with median rates over $40 per hour. The demand for software and IT talent continues to grow in the region, and is supported by the presence
of Microsoft, IBM, and Cisco Systems.
The City of Southfield is home to business support service centers for many of Southeast Michigan's major corporations, including Blue Care
Network, Michigan Mutual, and Credit Acceptance Corporation. In 2014, there were over 62,809 workers in administrative and business support
service positions in Oakland County alone. Occupation titles include analysts, administrative assistants, customer service representatives,
telephone call center, telephone answering service, telemarketing, and other contact center positions. Employment in the professional and
business support sectors for Southfield has increased by 26 per cent from 2010 to 2014, and call center workforce numbers has increased by
46.6 per cent in that same time period. Firms have clearly recognized that Southfield has the location, infrastructure, and talent needed for their
business support service centers
Both state equalized value and taxable value are expected to continue to increase in the future, albeit gradually. The Southeast Michigan Council
of Governments (SEMCOG) is optimistic stating, "This is a healthy outlook for the region and its communities." Ultimately, it's not strictly
income levels that determine an area's relative wealth-property values primarily contribute to a community's financial prosperity and are the
key to attracting profitable industries and businesses into the area. 54

Key Development Districts
The Michigan SmartZone network connects universities, industry, research organizations, government, and other community institutions to
stimulate the growth of technology-based businesses and jobs. In 2014, the Southfield SmartZone, along with Automation Alley regional
partners, was one of three local development finance authorities (LDFAs) in the State of Michigan to receive a 15-year extension from the
Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC). The Southfield SmartZone is a 384-acre certified technology park bordered by Telegraph
Road to the east, Inkster Road to the west, and adjacent to 1-696 at the northwest corner of the City of Southfield. It is home to 413 business

-109-

�Chapter 5: Economic Development
Current Conditions

employing over 4,000 total employees. Notable companies located in the
Southfield SmartZone include Sun Communities, Veoneer, Tenneco, Citizens
Bank, Grant Thornton LLP, CBS TV, and Hantz Group.
In addition to the SmartZone, the Southfield City Centre, adjacently located
south of 1-696 and east of M-10, is Metro Detroit's premier business district
with a diverse set of companies and talent that supports the vibrancy of the
area. Approximately 45,000 employees working in the finance, insurance,
real estate, health care, IT and software industries work within a five-minute
drive of the City Centre district. The district's largest employers include Blue
Care Network, Eaton, Plante Moran, RI, Alix Partners, Clarience Technologies,
Marelli, among many more. The Southfield City Centre district is actively
being marketed as a vibrant hotspot for retail and recreation, with the
capacity to support 645,000 square feet of retail projected to generate up to
$252 million in gross sales revenue by 2016.
For more information on the City Center district, please see Chapter 7: SubArea Plans.

Tax Revenue and Taxable Value

Figure 21. Breakdown of Taxable Value (2021-2022)
Industrial, $54,292,
1%

Personal,
$651,508,
12%

ommercial,
,443,156, 451}0

Source: Southfield Assessor's Department

Figure 20. General Fund Revenues, 2021-2022

Based on the adopted 2021-2022 City of Southfield Municipal Budget
Executive Summary, property taxes represent 66% of General Fund
Revenues. Projected taxable value, excluding capture districts (LDFA, ODA,
SmartZone, Brownfield Redevelopment Authority, and Renaissance Zone), is
$2,606,715,860 which represents a 1.36% increase over the 2020-21
projection.

46th District
Court,

State
Revenue
$8,793,54~,

11%

The taxable value of Commercial, Residential, Personal, and Industrial
properties contributes to the City's revenue from property taxes. As seen in
the chart below, the taxable value of Commercial properties results in
generating the most revenue to the City at 45% with Residential properties
generating the second most at 41%.

I

$3,3:~5,22,

Fees,
reimburseme
other, $8,284,
10%

Investment
income,
$750,000,

\
•
Sanitation
$2,748,000,

3%
Building,
Engineering,
Planning,
$3,942,308, 51}0
Property
Taxes,
$54,292,348
I 66%

Source: Southfield Assessor's Department

-110-

�Chapter 5: Economic Development
Current Conditions

Oakland County
Oakland County's economy is critical to the state because it provides 20% of states GDP and 17% of state's payroll employment. Oakland's high
education levels, strong family incomes, and large share of managerial and professional jobs put the county in a strong position to rebound from
the economic hardship resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Income
Average adjusted household income in Oakland County is significantly higher than in Michigan overall, reflecting Oakland's relative prosperity.
Average adjusted household income growth between 2012 and 2019 for Oakland County grew by 25%, from $113,000 to $142,000. In the state,
average adjusted incomes grew from $84,000 to $103,000. Only 18% of Oakland County residents live in lower-income households, compared to
28% of Michigan residents. Conversely, 32% of Oakland County residents lived in upper-income households, compared to only 19% of Michigan
residents.
However, the sharp economic disparities along racial and ethnic lines that exist at the state level are also present in Oakland County. Although
only 13% of Non-Hispanic Asian and 14% of Non-Hispanic White residents live in lower-income households, 27% of Hispanic and 33% of NonHispanic Black residents live in lower-income households.

Employment
During the Great Recession, the unemployment rate in
Michigan peaked at 13.8% in the third quarter of 2009, while in
Oakland the rate peaked one quarter later, at 13.3%. The
unemployment rate in the state and Oakland County will likely
continue to decline through the end of 2023, with the rate of
decline slightly faster in Oakland County. During Michigan's lost
decade culminating in the Great Recession, Oakland County lost
jobs at a faster rate than the state. The COVID-19 recession led
employment in the state of Michigan to decline by 846,700
{19.1%) in the second quarter of 2020, while Oakland County
lost 145,851 jobs {19.6%).
All of the net job gains in the county are forecast to occur in the
private sector. Government, which includes public K-12
education as well as Oakland University and Oakland
Community College, is forecast to lose 913 jobs between 2019
and 2023. Management of companies and enterprises lost only

-111-

�ChaJ&gt;lcr 5: Economic Den~lopmcnt
Current Conditions

303 jobs in 2020 as those companies successfully transitioned to working from home. Management employment is forecast to grow by 2,747
{14.5%) from 2019 to 2023.The finance and insurance industry gained jobs in 2020, and it is forecast to continue seeing steady job gains over the
next three years.
Employment in professional and technical services declined by 5,902 in 2020, but the county is expecting to recover all of those job losses and
more. Within the professional services industry, the county expects architectural and engineering services to see the largest job gains between
2019 and 2023 (3,704, or 9.2%). The construction industry gained 237 jobs in 2020, and the City expects it to be the fastest-growing major
industry in Oakland County over the next three years, adding 7,007 jobs between 2020 and 2023. A shortage of trained workers may limit those
gains, though.
The manufacturing sector outside of motor vehicle manufacturing is forecast to gain 1,127 jobs between 2019 and 2023, with the largest job
gains in miscellaneous manufacturing, which includes medical equipment (732), chemicals and pharmaceuticals (543) and plastics (464).
Transportation and warehousing is forecasted to grow by 1,977 jobs (15.3%) as e-commerce continues to grow.
The retail trade industry lost 9,277 jobs {11.8%) in 2020. We expect it will recover about one-third of those jobs in 2021 (3,179), but that
employment will then flatten out. We do not expect that retail trade will return to 2019 employment levels in the foreseeable future. Private
health and social services lost 9,427 jobs {8.8%) in 2020 as individuals deferred medical care. The county anticipates that almost all of these job
losses will be recovered over the next three years. Local hospitals, however, are expected to employ 1,800 fewer people in 2023 than they did in
2019.
Information services are expected to add only 399 jobs {3.0%) over the next three years, as job losses in newspapers and telecommunications
mostly offset job gains in software publishing and data processing. Employment in the local motor vehicle and parts manufacturing industry fell
by 2,842 jobs (13.1%) in 2020 but is expected to recover 46% of those job losses over the next three years {1,307). Like retail trade, the local
motor vehicle manufacturing industry may never return to 2019 employment levels.

Wages
The average real wage in Oakland County has consistently run about 15% higher than in the state of Michigan. Both Oakland County and
Michigan overall saw a large jump in average real wages during last year's pandemic recession; real wages grew by 6.2% in Oakland County and
by 5.8% statewide, the largest single-year increases in real wages on record. The jump in average wages last year represented the
disproportionate loss of lower-paying jobs relative to higher-paying jobs caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Few individual workers experienced
wage increases of that magnitude. As the economy recovers from the pandemic, employment among lower-income workers is expected to
increase more quickly than among higher-income workers.
Real wages are forecast to average $67,600 in Oakland and $58,700 in Michigan by 2023. Thus, despite the near-term pull-back, Oakland
County's average real wage in 2023 will stand 4.8% above 2019 levels. Whether this increase will be outpaced by inflation has yet to be
determined. 55

-112-

�Chapter 5: Economic .Dcvelop1ncnt
Current f'ond.itions

Education Sector

Employment in Oakland County's higher-education services industries
declined by 11% in the second quarter of 2020. The recovery in the
higher-education services industries should be boosted by the
widespread return of full-time, in-person K-12 and higher education in
2022. The return of the healthcare industry to more normal operations
should also boost employment in the higher-education services
industries.
The impact of the 2020 pandemic recession has been the most severe
for Oakland County's lower education services industries. In the second
quarter of 2020, employment in these industries declined by 32 .8%, or
nearly one-third. The county estimates that the lower-education
services industries recovered just over half of those job losses by the
fourth quarter of the year.
Although healthy job growth is forecast in the lower-education services
industries through 2023, but the reality is that these industries are
currently still in a deep hole, from which recovery will be difficult. Many
businesses in these industries have closed during the pandemic. It will
take time for new businesses to open and for new patterns of
consumer behavior to be established. Additionally, the headwinds
facing the retail trade industry prior to the pandemic remain in place.
With those factors in mind, the county forecasts employment in these
industries to remain 3.1% short of its pre-pandemic level at the end of
the forecast period in the fourth quarter of 2023. 56

-113-

�Chapter 5: Economic l&gt;cYclopmcnt
Recent Programs and Initiative~

Recent Programs and Initiatives
Programs
History of Incentives in Southfield
The City's economic base, while still rich in economic assets and opportunities, faces stiff competition from
newer and nimbler regional communities. This base is restructuring because of corporate mergers and
acquisitions, manufacturing and service industry outsourcing, and the desire by most businesses today to
reduce operating costs and improve productivity.
The City of Southfield's Business Development (SBD) team aids micro businesses to Fortune 500 companies
with specialized concierge services. They partner with businesses through every phase of the development
process. Whether a business relocation, construction of a new facility, or the launch of an entrepreneur's
small business dream, they will walk you through the process from identifying a site to grand opening.
SBD also connects businesses to a variety of federal, state, and regional incentives and assistance. Southfield's
incentives, combined with an ideal location, business-friendly atmosphere, fast-track concierge service and
motivated workforce, are why so many Fortune 500 and international companies have already said "Yes!" to
Southfield, "The Center of It All."

Local Incentive Policy
The City of Southfield is truly "Open for Business" as attested by our favorable business climate, skilled
workforce, and redevelopment ready, business-friendly environment. The City of Southfield is a "Core
Community" as designated by the State of Michigan. Corporations and development projects will be eligible
for a wide range of incentives from the State, County, and other local agencies.
Southfield Administration is dedicated to fostering a partnership between its investors, developers, and the
regulatory authorities to fill office space and to return "brownfield properties" to active and appropriate
reuse. The City encourages looking to open a business or developing a historically impacted property in the
City to discuss these incentives with the SBD.
The City prefers providing incentives to projects that support:
•
•
•

Increase occupancy in office sector
Provide adaptive reuse of vacant/blighted buildings
Create additional research and development and/or high-tech manufacturing
-114-

�f'lrnJ&gt;tcr 5: Economic Development
Recent Programs and lnitialiYcs

•
•

Increase the diverse range of industry
Advance strategic goals for the City of Southfield, such as:
o Increase the supply of workforce housing
o Increase the walkable environment
o Increase the commercial occupancy rate
o Contribute to advancing action items in the adopted Master Plan

Available Incentives
There are several types of incentives that can be used to assist with real estate redevelopment and business attraction efforts. These include,
among others, tax abatements, tax increment financing, revolving loan funds, low interest loans and grants, expedite planning and building
permits and Oakland County Michigan Works Southfield talent assistance. The City will discuss the options with developers during an initial
consulting meeting.
The applicant will be required to show a financial need for assistance and provide verification that they are eligible for assistance according to
state law. Pursuant to this policy, potential developers and/or companies may identify a specific need and apply for local and state incentives.
The Southfield City Council sets parameters for when and how particular local incentives will be awarded and will consider each application on a
case-by-case basis, based on the merits of the particular project and intended future use of the property, if applicable.
PA 210 Commercial Rehabilitation Act

Encourages the rehabilitation of commercial property by abating the property taxes generated from new investment for a period up to 10 years.
Properties must meet eligibility requirements and be located in a Commercial Rehabilitation District as defined by the City of Southfield and by
Oakland County. The State Tax Commission is responsible for final approval and issuance of Commercial Rehabilitation certificates.
PA 198 Industrial Facilities Exemption

Property tax abatements were created by the State of Michigan to provide a stimulus in the form of significant tax incentives to industries that
renovate and expand aging plants, build new plants, and promote establishment of research and development laboratories. Property tax
abatement is an incentive provided primarily to build new plants in Michigan or renovate and expand aging assembly, manufacturing, and
research plants. The incentive comes in the form of abated property taxes. The value of the project added will produce 50% of the taxes for a set
period of time and then resume to the full tax value at the end of the abatement period. The State Tax Commission is responsible for final
approval and issuance of Industrial Facilities Tax Exemption certificates.

-115-

�Chapter 5: Economic nc,·clopment
Recent Programs and Initiatives
Public Act 328 New Personal Property Exemption

Allows eligible businesses to abate personal property taxes on new investments in the City of
Southfield. Eligible projects include manufacturing, mining, research and development, wholesale
trade, and office operations. The State Tax Commission is responsible for final approval and
issuance of Personal Property Tax Exemption certificates.
A developer or company cannot be eligible for incentives in the City if it meets any of the following
criteria:
•
•

There are outstanding back taxes owed on the property, or
The parcel on which development is proposed is not an eligible property as defined by the
applicable legislation.

In 2014, the legislature finalized revisions to the Michigan Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform.
Under this revised package, the small "essential services assessment" (ESA) that manufacturers pay
to cover their costs associated with local government police, fire, ambulance, and jail services will
now be a flat, statewide rate that is fixed and requires only one form and payment to be submitted
to the state.
Michigan Business Development Program

This program is available to eligible businesses that create qualified new jobs and/or make qualified
new investment in Michigan. This is a new incentive program available from the Michigan Strategic
Fund (MSF) in cooperation with the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC). The
program is designed to provide grants, loans, and other economic assistance to businesses for
highly competitive projects in Michigan that create jobs and/or provide investment.
Brownfield Tax Increment Financing

For brownfield tax increment financing, the cost of certain eligible activities may be reimbursed
through capture of taxes on the increased taxable value resulting from redevelopment. This tax
capture can apply to both local and state property taxes but will require approval of the MEDC
and/or MDEQ if state property taxes are captured. Eligible activities in the City include, not limited
to:
•

Environmental Assessments (ex. Phase I, Soil and Groundwater Investigations, Baseline
Environmental Assessments)

-116-

�.....
Chapter 5: Economic Development
Recent Programs and lnitiatin!s

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Response Activities
Due Care Plans
Remediation and Engineered Controls
Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Abatement
Demolition
Pre-demolition asbestos abatement
Other actions necessary to protect the health, safety, welfare, environment, or natural resources
Public Infrastructure
Site Preparation
Site Improvements

Interest costs are not considered to be an eligible activity under this policy. Whether the Applicant successfully demonstrates such a need will be
determined at the sole discretion of the City. Applicants are encouraged to obtain approval for school tax capture as appropriate for the eligible
activities requested. The Applicant is responsible for keeping detailed records of all eligible expenses and investments, including purchase
orders, invoices, waiver of liens, contracts, and records of payment, and for providing these to the City when requesting the incentive, as
detailed by the City. Final reimbursement will be based on the records provided, and the City is not responsible for incomplete or inaccurate
records. All requests for eligible expense reimbursement must be received no later than one year after receipt of certificate of occupancy in
order to be considered eligible for reimbursement.
A construction, redevelopment, renovation, or reconstruction project can be eligible for incentives in the City if it meets all the following criteria:
• The property is in the City of Southfield
• The property is an eligible property as defined by applicable legislation
An eligible project can be considered for incentives in the City if it meets all the following criteria:
•
•

The project is consistent with the objectives of this guideline and the City Master Plan
The projects construction budget and operating proforma indicate that it requires incentives to be successful and would not occur
without the incentives
• The project will significantly contribute to revitalization of the City through increased property taxes, job creation or creation of place
• The development will ameliorate impediments to redevelopment through demolition, restoration, remediation, mitigation, or control
A project cannot be eligible for brownfield incentives in the City if it meets any of the following criteria:
•
•
•

The Applicant is responsible for hazardous substance contamination identified at the property
There are outstanding back taxes owed on the property
The Applicant is not an innocent landowner as defined by Act 381

-117-

�•
Chapter 5: Economic DcYclopmcnt
Recent Program~ and Initiatives

•

The parcel on which development is proposed is not an eligible property as defined by the applicable legislation

Projects will be evaluated based on, but not limited to, the following criteria :
• The amount of extraordinary costs for redevelopment
• Amount of property tax generated after construction
• Amount of investment on a square foot basis
• Job retention, creation, and quality
•
Location
•
Existence of abandoned, blighted or functionally obsolete buildings on property
•
Length of time for which incentives are being requested
• Amelioration of threats to public health or the environment
• Whether the project will provide additional beneficial effects on the surrounding area and the community as a whole
For more on how brownfield redevelopment ties in with the natural environment and health, please see Chapter 3: Healthy Living.

Pandemic Response
Federal Response

Created by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) in 2021, the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds provide eligible governments
with a substantial infusion of resources to meet pandemic response needs and rebuild a stronger, more equitable economy as the country
recovers. Within the categories of eligible uses, recipients have broad flexibility to decide how best to use this funding to meet the needs of their
communities. From an infrastructure standpoint, governments may use Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to:
•

Support public health expenditures, by funding COVID-19 mitigation efforts, medical expenses, behavioral healthcare, and certain public
health and safety staff.

•

Address negative economic impacts caused by the public health emergency, including economic harms to workers, households, small
businesses, impacted industries, and the public sector. This can provide a wide range of assistance to individuals and households, small
businesses, and impacted industries, in addition to enabling governments to rehire public sector staff and rebuild capacity.

•

Replace lost public-sector revenue, using this funding to provide government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue
experienced due to the pandemic.

•

Provide premium pay for essential workers, offering additional support to those who have borne and will bear the greatest health risks
because of their service in critical infrastructure sectors. This can be used to offer premium pay directly, or through grants to private
employers, to a broad range of essential workers who must be physically present at their jobs

-118-

�Chapter 5: Economic ncvclopmcnt
Recent Program~ and Initiatives

•

Invest in water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure, making necessary investments to improve access to clean drinking water, support
vital wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, and to expand access to broadband internet. Cities may also use this funding to invest
in wastewater infrastructure projects, including constructing publicly owned treatment infrastructure, managing, and treating
stormwater or subsurface drainage water, facilitating water reuse, and securing publicly-owned treatment works. Cities may use funds
for maintenance of infrastructure or pay-go spending for building of new infrastructure as part of the general provision of government
services, to the extent of the estimated reduction in revenue due to the public health emergency.

ARPA also provides for transit agency grants, which can be used for transit agencies to prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19. This
includes the reimbursement of payroll of public transportation employees, operating costs to maintain service due to lost revenue due because
of the COVID-19 public health emergency and paying the administrative leave of operations personnel due to reductions in service.
MEDC/State Response
Since a State of Emergency was declared in March of 2020 in response to COVID-19, the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC)
has launched 23 economic relief and recovery programs to provide vital economic support to businesses, entrepreneurs, workers, and
communities across all 83 Michigan counties to support the frontlines in the fight against COVID-19.
County Response
Oakland County is comprised of more than 1.2 million residents and 42,000 businesses that generate more than 20 percent of Michigan's gross
domestic product. Maintaining a healthy economy in Oakland County is not only a key goal, but also provides an essential contribution to the
fiscal well-being of the region and state. As of spring of 2021, Oakland County received more than $257 million in funding from the federal and
state governments to manage through the pandemic. The largest portion dedicated to communities and families; closely followed by funding for
businesses and workers; and, finally, to support county COVID-19 operations.
Oakland County leaned in to provide support to make certain residents had the resources they needed to survive. Through funding to local
municipalities, public schools, libraries, senior centers, veteran service organizations, and community centers, the county worked to ensure
services and support systems were accessible virtually and/or in person. Emergency funds for rent, mortgage, utilities, and food assistance also
were made available to veterans and their dependents, as well as citizens negatively impacted financially by COVID-19. Nearly $90 million in
support was directed to the business community for those seriously impacted by the pandemic through a variety of initiatives, including:
•

•
•

A series of five small business grant programs that provided direct financial support to small businesses, in the early days of the
pandemic through the winter of 2021, ranging from the retail and hospitality industries to manufacturing, business services, and
wholesale
Grant programs were developed to support manufacturing companies to retool and use advanced manufacturing processes to provide
PPE and improve the region's ability to respond to future supply chain disruptions
15,000 reopen kits were created to help small businesses access hard to find PPE and cleaning supplies needed to safely open to the
public

-119-

�Chapter 5: Economic Development
Recent Programs and Initiatives

Southfield Response
In response to the pandemic, the City of Southfield instituted the following measures to assist businesses:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Allowed restaurants to expand outdoor dining areas
Allowed providers of personal services to operate outside an established business
Reduced fees and expedited approvals
Provided businesses with free 'Open for Business1 and/or 'Open for Carryout1 lawn signs
Distributed over 400 free COVID-19 safety tool kits to help small businesses reopen safely
Offering grants for restaurant relief through the Restaurant Technology and PPE Reimbursement Program and the Restaurant
Weatherization Program

RRC Program
The Redevelopment Ready Communities (RRC) program was initially developed under the Michigan Suburbs Alliance in 2006. Southfield was one
of the first five communities to obtain certification in 2006 and was recertified in 2019. Southfield's RRC Certification is now valid through
December of 2024, but the process for updating begins December 9, 2022.
Throughout 2020, MEDC and the Michigan Municipal Executives (MME) worked together to solicit feedback on communities' experience in RRC
and how they could work to ensure RRC is built in a way that acknowledges the challenges and ever-changing needs local communities face.
Feedback included a widely distributed survey with over 200 responses as well as three live feedback sessions facilitated by customer service
professionals, allowing them to capture not only quantitative feedback but also hear the real-world stories and impacts RRC is having in
communities.
RRC 2.0 provides two options for communities to choose from, allowing communities to choose the
path that best fits local capacity and goals. While some new ones were included, the number of best
practice criteria decreased overall. In conjunction with RRC 2.0, the MEDC released updated guides,
Trello boards, RRC Library, training modules and more.
The City previously identified three redevelopment-ready sites under the RRC program, including: the
former Northland Center, the city owned vacant 8.14-acre parcel ("EverCentre 11 ) located at the
northwest corner of Evergreen Road and Civic Center Drive, and the former McKinley School.

-120-

�Chapter 5: Economic Development
Recent Programs and Jniliali\'CS

2018 SODA Reestablishment
The Southfield Downtown Development Authority (SODA) is the governmental
entity responsible for capturing local tax revenue and directly reinventing it in
local community amenities, particularly those that boost economic
development. The SODA was created by City Council in 1988 to stabilize the
area known as the SODA District. After the initial period of the SODA lapsed, it
was re-established on May 5, 2018, by City Council.
The SODA District's location astride the Lodge Freeway (M-10) and adjacent to
the Cities of Detroit and Oak Park is an important gateway into the City of
Southfield. The district is approximately one square mile, bounded by Mt.
Vernon to the north, Greenfield Road to the east, Eight Mile Road to the
south, and Southfield Road to the west. The SDDA's continued success and
vitality are important to maintain Southfield's positive community image in
the southeast Michigan region.
The largest land area in the District includes the former Northland Shopping
Center. Built in the 19SO's, Northland was one of America's first enclosed
shopping centers. The District is also home to the new Northland City Center
(under construction), Oakland Community College, St John Providence
Hospital (Southfield's largest employer), and Surgeons Choice Medical Center
along with a concentration of health services type office and commercial uses.
Since the inception of the SODA, the District has seen more that $160 million
in development and redevelopment construction. Some recent activities
include the Northland City Center redevelopment, Oakland Community
College campus expansion, which includes the acquisition of the adjacent
North Park Plaza property, and St John Providence emergency center
expansion.

SSDA MISSION
"Ensure a safe and prosperous environment that advances technology,
healthcare, retail, and higher education while supporting stakeholder
values that care, share, and grow the Community."

-121-

Map 10. Southfield DDA Boundary

�Chapter 5: Economic lle\'clopment
Recent Programs and Initiatives

Additionally, the SODA has partnered in public improvement projects including the
Nine Mile Road reconstruction, Northland Transit Center reconstruction, and the
Greenfield Road reconstruction. Also, the SODA has constructed sidewalks,
improved streetscape amenities along with bus stop improvements to enhance the
walkability of the district. The SODA provides maintenance of all the public space
and streetscape areas within the district.

Finance Mechanism
The SDDA's operations are funded through a 1.778 mill tax levy along with Tax
Increment Finance (TIF} revenues to achieve the objectives of the development
plan. Using TIF revenues, the SODA has contributed over $1 million in public
improvements to the roads, streetscapes, gateway features and landscape
improvements. Unfortunately, at present the Tax Increment Finance tool which the
SODA uses for projects is still under-funded, meaning there are no funds to
complete projects now. Once future projects come on-line, then additional
revenue may be available.
Today, the SODA maintains focus on attracting retailers, restaurants and medical
healthcare providers to the area and filling a demand by area residents and
employees for goods and services close to home and work. However, because of
the pandemic impacts to the local and national economy, the SODA is not
currently collecting enough tax revenue to finance all planned projects.

Governance
A twelve-member board, plus the Mayor, meet bi-monthly to carry out the
activities of the organization. The SODA uses committee structure to advise staff
and review specific projects and finances.

-122-

. SODA FOCUSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Enhance the District's physical layout.
Improve the District's public infrastructure and
aesthetics.
Provide development and redevelopment
assistance.
Encourage improvements on private properties.
Renovate and improve the District's facilities.
Continue maintenance and District operations.
Promote business development.
Conduct District-wide marketing, on-going
administration, and planning.

Map 11. Oakland Community College Campus Future
Expansion Map

�Chapter 5: Economic De, elopmcnt
Recent Prog1·ams an&lt;l lnitiath,cs

Map 12. Downtown Development Authority (DDA} Buildings in 3-D Classified by Use

d ing
Ace."t~ent

r.g

1-ieelth end Soc,e Servi ces
Trtr.sDo"tat;on erd lJt ': ,y

f'

Park;ng Gerege
De l vel} Se -vice:;

LbreCorr-..:ory Qua:-:er$

f'

Go11ern~erte
Le ,sur-= Act 111 t'

Menu':acti.:r:nc;

f' Re l:g o u~a!id C,v,c
f'
f'

Res dent a l Care Fae ·.;y

Y./ere~.ou,;e e:-,d Storage
\N hole~a•e Trade
O;her

-123-

�.Chapter 5: Economic l&gt;c,·elopmcnt
Recent Prog1·ams and Initiative!-t

Strategic Planning
The most recent strategic plan for the SDDA was adopted in 2013, prior
to the lapse and reestablishment of the authority. The purpose of the
2013 SDDA Strategic Plan is to reaffirm the overall direction for the
SDDA District with input provided by the SDDA Board, the City of
Southfield, and other partners. Considering the effects of changes in
the economy, population and housing trends is a vital piece to the
continued growth of the area .

,,,,_,,...-

\

Plan Goals and Objectives
~

1.

Infrastructure &amp; Aesthetics: Enhance the District's streetlight

2.

infrastructure and increase safety for pedestrians; Enhance the
District's road infrastructure; Improve the appearance of Eight
Mile, the Service Drive and Greenfield Roads; Improve the
District's walkability; Enhance the District's landscape and
fr•par&lt;fd by 1M City ol
aesthetics; Transit Improvements.
l'lanning
.....
Economic Vitality of the SODA: Prepare and adopt a real estate
property acquisition policy; Support streamlining of City's
approval process; Pursue funding from non-TIF sources.
Marketing &amp; Communications: Improve the public's perception so that the SDDA is considered a safe place to live, work and visit;
Strengthen code enforcement in the District; Improve communication between apartment owners in the District and the SDDA;
Continue public relations and marketing program and work with media to broadcast success.

-~

11G

3.

~

~

,..,,. .. , :IQ2l

Housing

The housing stock in the Southfield DDA is dominated by units in large buildings, as 48.6% of the district's housing units are in buildings
containing 20 or more units. 70% of the SDDA's housing units are rentals, which is substantially higher than the housing stock in the city.
Interestingly, home values for owner-occupied units in the SDDA are slightly higher than in the City of Southfield, perhaps because of recent
conversions of rental units into condominiums. However, rents in the SDDA are lower than the City's median value . Overall, this indicates that
the SDDA is a viable and competitive choice for persons seeking housing in the city, a positive indicator for the future success of the SDDA
District.

-124-

�-Chapter 5: Economic Development
Recent Prog1·ams imd Initiatives

Business and Employment

The SODA is an important business and employment center within the City, as the home to retail, healthcare, and education entities. Prepandemic, the SODA was home to roughly 11.05% of all businesses in the city and 8.02% of all employees in Southfield worked in the SODA. The
health services sector made up the highest concentration of employment at 37 .4%; followed by the retail trade sector at 17 .2% and professional,
scientific and technical services sector at 8.8% in the SODA district.

Other Projects and Developments
Non-Motorized Pathways
As of 2022, the City is working on linking the City Centre shared-use pathway to the future perimeter pathway to be constructed around the
Northland City Center and connecting the City Centre District to the DDA District and Lawrence Technological University (LTU) to Ascension
Providence Hospital - Southfield (a full-service hospital with 24/7 emergency care, a Level II Trauma Center, and a Primary Stroke Center) via
a non-motorized pathway. For more on the City Centre Trail, see Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure.
The Southfield Non-Motorized Pathway and Public Transit Plan (adopted 2013) is the basis for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit improvements on
a city-wide scale. At the time, the master plan recommended performing sub-area plans for the City Centre and SODA that would have specific
projects and priorities for implementation. These sub-areas plans would create the needed connections at a pedestrian scale.
These pathway sub-area plans began with a review of the previous planning efforts and on-going City sponsored projects. Public input included
an on-line survey, and interviews with City and SODA staff, SODA businesses, and transit stakeholders. The primary objectives resulting from the
effort are:
•

•
•

Pedestrian Connections: Mid-block pedestrian crossings with refuge islands and pedestrian signals; Aesthetics and amenity
improvements, including lighting, landscaping, and benches; Bridge improvements to facilitate pedestrian crossings of the Lodge
Freeway (M-10).
Bicyclists: Northwestern connector to Lawrence Tech, MOOT/Greyhound, and the City Centre district; On-street bike lanes on Mt
Vernon; Bicycle parking as part of new developments; Bicycle routes connecting east and west of the Lodge Freeway.
Transit: Creation of a transit center along Nine Mile Road near the Oakland Community College Southfield campus; Staged
improvements to the existing transit center at Northland Center; ADA compliance, including key-walk installations; Additional
installations of bus shelters, including benches, trash receptacles and bike racks where appropriate.

-125-

�Chapter 5: Economic nc,·clopmcnt
Recent Programs and Initiative~

Coasting The Baseline Project
The Coasting the Baseline Project is a series of commemorative markers
located on Eight Mile (Baseline) Road. Each marker is a ten-foot-tall obelisk
that describes the significance of surveying in the settlement of Michigan and
as the foundation for property ownership in the state. Michigan was the first
state in the nation to be fully surveyed using modern surveying practices.
Known as the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) or the rectangular survey
system, it is a mathematically designed and based method of measuring land.
The Baseline became known as Eight Mile Road and runs across Michigan
from Wayne County on the east to Van Buren County on the west. The prime
meridian was established at 84 degrees, 22 minutes, 24 seconds west
longitude, a line drawn straight north from Defiance, Ohio. All subsequent
land surveys in Michigan refer to these principal coordinates. The original
Southfield Township was designated as "Town No. 1 North, Range 10 East."
The Southfield Coasting the Baseline Obelisk is the fourth obelisk installed to
join those of other neighboring communities (Farmington Hills, Northville, and
Novi) along Eight Mile Road. It is envisioned that markers will stretch from Lake
St. Clair to Lake Michigan along the baseline. The markers, designed by Michigan
native and world-renowned sculptor David Barr (1939-2015), include engraved
references to early surveying tools, land ownership, and elements of each
community's local history (including Southfield) and are made from alternating
blocks of black and white granite . The obelisk shape was chosen because it was
commonly used by early surveyors to mark significant geographical points. The
site selected for Southfield's Coasting the Baseline marker is at Eight Mile and
Rutland on City-owned property, located in the SODA district.
The Southfield Coasting the Baseline Obelisk was erected in the fall of 2015
through private and corporate sponsors. The project includes a 24-foot by 24foot concrete plaza, divided into 36 equal squares to replicate the original 36
square mile sections of Southfield Township. Each section contains a survey
marker representing a numbered section 1-36. Additional features include
benches, brick piers and ornamental fencing, landscaping, and a "donation"
plaza . The plaza was dedicated on June 10, 2016.

-126-

�Clrnpter 5: Economic Development
Recent Programs and Initiatives

Northland Center Redevelopment
When the Northland Center first opened in 1954, it was the world's largest shopping center. Northland led the way for Southfield to become a
major commercial, business, and residential center in metropolitan Detroit. In addition to being a catalyst to population growth in Southfield,
the Center help foster enormous office expansion in the City.
The opening of Northland Center on March 22, 1954, was the springboard for the phenomenal growth of Southfield in the 1950's and 1960's.
The Northland Center was the Nation's first modern shopping mall opened in 1954. The anchor of more than 80 stores would be the world's
largest branch department store: the JL Hudson Company. Hudson's selected the site in Southfield because of its location near major roads and
the area's growing, migrating population. The architect, Victor Gruen's vision was to create an urban core in a suburban setting. He believed that
a shopping center encompassed the good qualities of the old marketplace and country fair.
However, after a sixty-year successful run and due to changing retail shopping habits of consumers and products, Northland center fell into
receivership and closed in April 2015. Over time, Northland became a victim of the economy, competition from other lifestyle shopping centers,
changing consumer tastes, and a shift in retail shopping including e-commerce. Ashkenazy Acquisition, which bought the Mall in 2008, defaulted
on a $31 million payment in 2014. In September 2014, Northland Mall entered into a court-appointed receivership under the direction of Simon
and Attorneys ("Simon"). Shortly after this both Target and Macy announced they would close their respective stores forcing the mall to close in
its entirety April of 2015.
In December 2015, the City of Southfield purchased the former Northland Center and its 114-acre site for $2.4 million. The purchase does not
include the closed Target store or the Triumph Church (former JC Penny Department store). The City estimates that it will spend approximately
$8-10 million in demolition and land clearance. The City of Southfield has identified two primary sources of funding: The Tax Base Initiative Fund
(TBIF) and the Local Improvement Revolving Fund (LIRF). In addition, there are several grants and low interest/no interest loan opportunities to
off-set part of the cost of the purchase, demolition, and site clean-up.
Former Northland Mall Redevelopment Study

In 2016, the City of Southfield hired a professional design development team, guided by a steering committee, to assist the City with the
development of an initial strategic plan for the redevelopment and repurposing of the former Northland Mall site (approximately 114 acres) to
include: acquisition, site assemblage, demolition, repurposing, public engagement, creation of mixed-use concept plans, g;-een infrastructure,
place making, branding campaign, marketing, and a phased development plan.

-127-

�,_
-Chapter 5: Economic Development
Recent Programs and Initiatives

Reinventing Former Northland Mall Site

As of August 2021, the City of Southfield successfully sold Northland Mall, for $11,093,000, to Contour Companies ("Contour") of Bloomfield
Hills, Michigan. Contour Companies (aka Northland Center, LLC) have proposed a dynamic mixed-use redevelopment including apartments at
various rental rates, retail and restaurants, office and green space that closely mirrors the City's original vision for the Northland Redevelopment
based upon residents' collective input. Contour plans to save the original five retail pads from the former mall as well as the underground
tunnels and former Hudson's building. The redevelopment will occur in two phases. Phase 1 will transform the property into a lively new urban
center that consists of approximately 1,339-unit mixed-use apartment community which will provide work-force housing. Six of these buildings
will have a commercial component on the ground floor. The former Hudson's store will be developed into the Hudson City Market, a vibrant
food-and-specialty home furnishings marketplace, occupied with dining and entertainment options. Phase 2, located on the western part of the
property, will both complement and complete the development's sense of community by incorporating townhouses and more mixed-useresidential. The landmark power plant is proposed to become a community clubhouse adjacent to the Northland water tower.

-128-

�Ch apter 5: Economic Dc,·clopmcnt
Recent Programs and Initiath·c8

Northland City Center

On January 19, 2021, the City Council approved and applied the Overlay Development District ODD (see Chapter 2: Key Recent Changes and
Trends for full explanation) for the re-envisioned " Northland City Center," mixed -use development on approximately 105 acres by Contour
Companies of Bloomfield Hills. Demolition began in the summer of 2021 and the first phase of development began, which includes a mixed-use
development consisting of up to 1292 apartment units, 218 loft reside nces, and 144,522 square feet of commercial space along Greenfield Road,
renovations to the former mall (approx. 750,000 sq . ft. i.e., Hudson Market Place, Health, Wellness and Fitness, Cinemas, etc.)
Phase II will have mixed-use commercial space; 84 townhouses and 192 apartments; health, wellness and fitness; recreational facilities; hotels;
senior living; medical and general office; water tower restoration; pump house renovation and related uses within the Northland Overlay
Development District.

LJ Phase 1-A

Buildings '/\ &amp; 'B'

Constructio11
05.08.2022 to 09.03,2023

LJ

Phase 1-B Buildings 'F' &amp; 'G'

D

Phase 1-C Buildings

Construction
03.15.2023 to 09. 15.2025

1' &amp; 'K'

Construction
10.15.2024 to 04.15.2026

LJ Phase 1-D

Buildings 'C' &amp; T

LJ Phase 1-E

Buildings 'D' &amp; 'E'

Construction
05.15.2025 to 0J.15.2027

- J LJ
D

Construction
05.15.2025 to 01.15 2027

Phase 1-F Buildings 'H' &amp; 'N'
ConstructioJJ
04.15.2027 to 02.15.2029

r!:c.se 1-G Buildings 'I: &amp; 'M'
Con~truction
04.15.2027 to 02.15.2029

LJ Pha se 1-H

Northland Center

Construction
11.15.2021 to 11.15.2025

Phase 1-1

Hudson's City Ctr.

Construction
07 15.2022 to 11 15. 2025

NORTHLAND
PHASING PLAN - Amended ODD for
NoitoScxii~ · ~ · - CITY
·- -CENTER
.. Costco
-

LJ

Phase 2-A Costco Bus. Ctr
Con ,truction
04.01.2023to11.04.2023

-129-

�ChaJ&gt;ter 5: Economic DeYelopmcnt
Recent Programs and Initiatives

The Middlepointe (formerly EverCentre)
In 2021, Middlepointe Investment Group,
LLC a Michigan limited liability company,
was approved for an Overlay Development
District for a mixed-use phase
development for the city owned vacant
8.14-acre parcel (formerly known as
"EverCentre") located at the northwest
corner of Evergreen Road and Civic Center
Drive. The multi-phased mixed-use
development may include retail,
restaurant, office, residential and pocket
parks.
The Middlepointe project consists of
construction of new workforce housing
and mixed-use development. This project
will complete the site demolition left
unfinished from the previous three
building office-complex and fill and repair
the grade issues left currently present
onsite. The new development project
consists of construction of a walkable,
high-density mixed-use development. A mix of 4 to 6 story residential and retail buildings will be constructed on the western side of the site
along Central Park Boulevard, with a multi-story parking deck, and integrated, high-density, ground level parking beneath one of the residential
structures. In total, the project includes 275 residential units (240,000 square feet), a 448-space multi-story parking deck, 20,000 square feet of
retail/commercial flex space with associated parking, and pocket-parks, public gathering, and green space. The apartments will include amenities
such as community areas, pool, fitness center, business center, pet spa, parking garage, keyless entry, package room, storage, bike share and
more. Residents will have direct access to City Centre shops and restaurants.
The project is mixed-use and fits into the City of Southfield's redevelopment ready community plans for a walkable community. The city has
made significant investments in improving walkability within the City Centre, especially along the Evergreen Road corridor, h together local
businesses, universities, residences, and parks. This project significantly increases the Southfield City Centre's mixed-use presence, while
providing amenities and services to residents and visitors all within walking distance. This project is a lynch-pin that will bind all the other efforts
to date.
-130-

�Chapter 5: Economic nc,·clopmcnt
Recent Program~ and lnitiatiYcs

Location

The project is located at the northwest corner of Evergreen Road and Civic Center Driver, Southfield's version of "Main St. and Main St." Located
in the commercial corridor of Evergreen Road, in the heart of Southfield's developing City Centre district, it is adjacent to the city's municipal
complex, library, golf course, ice rink, recreational and park center (east of the project), connected by a pedestrian crossing. New mixed-use
residential development is located directly west of the project location. The Southfield Town Center office complex and the 33-story, 216 unit,
5000 Town Center residential high-rise along with 250 Brownstone Town homes are to the south of the project. This development will
complement the numerous other mixed-use, retail, corporate offices and parks that have been developed in the City Centre over the past 5
years.
Workforce Housing

The project fits within the city's master plan and is part of the city's area-wide planning effort and integrated into its redevelopment ready
community plans. Workforce housing is in high demand, especially in the City Centre area. Southfield has a large corporate footprint, and the
current dated housing stock does not provide options which include modern design or amenities found in surrounding communities. This is
critical to ensure Southfield can attract and retain residents in the workforce. More now than ever the current workforce is seeking housing
options that are in close proximity of their jobs, including
everyday services and amenities within walking distance. The
Middlepointe Development checks all these boxes and will
serve the current demand for workforce housing. The
development also has space allocated for co-working space to
accommodate the trend of remote workspaces. The City of
Southfield has been actively supporting this development effort
in the City Centre with the following projects.
The Middlepointe development will provide a diverse mix of
tenants that will create jobs and provide both entry-level
positions and upper tier positions in the medical field.
Furthermore, the development of this key site will attract new
business and residents to the City, while spurring further
development of nearby properties. This development will also
act as a retention mechanism for companies who currently call
the Southfield City Centre home.

-131-

�,,,,,,.. .,,,.,.
Chapter 5: Uconomic Dt~,clopmcnt
Recent Programs and Initiatives

McKinley School Redevelopment

In the 1920s, the local school district was served by a one room schoolhouse-not exactly
the type of modern living that Baker was trying to sell to prospective homebuyers.
Therefore, in an unusual fashion for a home developer, Baker himself financed the
construction of a new school building to attract families to the area. The school, built in a
then-popular Collegiate Gothic Revival style, was named for U.S. President William
McKinley, and completed in 1929. McKinley School features architectural enhancements
such as terrazzo floors and custom tiled drinking fountains and fireplaces.
Southfield Township, and later as the City of Southfield after its incorporation,
experienced significant post-WWII suburban development. The district's enrollment
tripled in the 1950s alone. Due to overcrowding, in 1956 the school district constructed
an addition to the building in the modern International Style.
Just as in the 1920s, growth projections of the 1950s were overestimated and the
population boom slowed, and in time the school found itself underused and outdated .
McKinley School closed in 1971 but was given additional uses throughout the 1970s and
early 1980s via special education, Southfield Schools staff offices and as a community
-132-

�Ch.tJ&gt;tcr 5: Economic De, dopmcnt
Recent Programs and lnit.iath·e s

center. The school district leased and later sold the building in 1984 to the Academy of Detroit North, who at some point added portable
classrooms to the property. The Academy of Detroit North closed in 2015 and the site has been vacant since.
Phase I: 18 residential condominiums within school building and removal of temporary portable structures along with lawn restoration
•
•
•

9 one-bedroom units (943 -1,020 sq. ft.)
6 two-bedroom units (1,281-1,786 sq. ft.)
3 three-bedroom units (2,100 - 2,600 sq. ft.)

Phase II: Construction of 11 two-story, two-family side-by-side residential condominiums (22 total units)
•

22 three-bedroom units (1,811- 2,090 sq. ft.)

John Grace School Redevelopment
The former John Grace School and Community Center, located at 2130 Indian Street, is
being considered for adaptive re-use for affordable senior housing. The City, in
cooperation with the Planning Department and Planning Commission, is looking at the
feasibility of renovating the historic building, reconfiguring the site, and making public
improvements near the subject property.
In early 2022, the City began considering rezoning the property as a Residential Unit
Development District (RUDD). The RUDD option amendment to the zoning ordinance was
adopted on May 30, 2019, with the aim to spur innovative redevelopment of historic
buildings; the John Grace site is one of several that had been designated as possible future
RUDD sites within the city. John Grace Arms, a multifamily development proposal by
Lockwood Companies, is now in the preliminary review process and, if approved, would
provide 60 affordable housing units in addition
to a 0.62-acre public park and indoor
community space available for reservation.
Providing appropriate senior housing options is
increasingly important as the general
population ages. Fewer financial resources are
available to older residents, as such, they need
affordable options that are safe, attractive,
and stimulating. Many older adults live in
established neighborhoods, and some find
their financial resources strained over time,

-133-

�I

.-

Cha1&gt;tcr 5: Economic Dc\'elopmcnt
Recent Programs and Initiatives

leaving them to struggle to maintain their homes, or worse, to heat them or pay their mortgage at all. Seen as a transition from the single-family
neighborhoods to the north into the more intensely developed areas along Eight Mile Road and Grand River Avenue to the south, the
improvements are likely to activate continued investment from the City, businesses, and neighbors.
The Alcove and Arbor Lofts

The Alcove

I

I

Utilizing the Overlay Development District (ODD) zoning tool (see Chapter 2: Key
Recent Changes and Trends), the Alcove project, pictured left, was the
conversion of the former Hawthorn Suites into 144 total units of market-rate
multi-family style housing units in 18 buildings with community center, pool,
outdoor patios and dog park

Arbor Lofts
The Arbor Lofts project, pictured below, was a three-phase redevelopment
project that converted the former 114,000-square-foot, four-story Civic Plaza
office building into a new residential and retail community in 2013.
•

Phase 1: The top three floors were converted into 57 loft apartments with
a total of 171 rooms. The first floor has been converted into mixed-use
space, including a common gym, and lounge area, and other business and
personal service type uses.
• Phase 2: 16-24 two-bedroom micro-units (450-900 sf) within row-houses
along Civic Center Drive and existing carports converted to 6 additional
units.
• Phase 3: includes 24-72 two-bedroom micro-units (450-900 sf) of multifamily units located to the northern portion of the site with a new dog
park.

-134-

�Chapter 5: Economic D&lt;.·Yclopmcnt
Recent Programs and Initiatives

Centrepolis Accelerator (LTU)
Lawrence Technological University (LTU) is a private university
founded in 1932 that offers nearly 100 programs through the
doctoral level in its Colleges of Architecture and Design, Arts and
Sciences, Business and Information Technology, and Engineering.
PayScale lists Lawrence Tech among the nation's top 11 percent of
universities for the salaries of its graduates, and U.S. News and World
Report lists it in the top tier of best Midwestern universities. Students
benefit from small class sizes and a real-world, hands-on, "theory and
practice" education with an emphasis on leadership. Activities on
Lawrence Tech's 107-acre campus include more than 60 student
organizations and NAIA varsity sports.
The Centrepolis Accelerator is a business incubator on a mission to
accelerate the growth of Michigan's cleantech and advanced
manufacturing entrepreneurs by providing access to key business and
product development resources. Centrepolis is proud to announce
the launch of the nation's first Cleantech, Climatech, and Circular
Economy (C 3 ) Accelerator. First and foremost, the C3 Accelerator would not be possible if it wasn't for the funding partners at the Michigan
Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), NEI, Wells Fargo IN2, the DoE, City of Southfield, and Lawrence Technological
University. As of 2021, the C3 Accelerator will utilize a $2S0K+ fund in grant, loans, and services to support the product development and scaling
efforts of Michigan and globally based technology companies with solutions that support a cleaner and circular economy.
Technologies:
Cleantech

Qualifications:
-- - - -·- - --Utilizing waste streams in the value chain to convert into value added products and efficiencies, via
recycling, upcycling, recovery, or reprocessing with other materials.

'
t

Circular Economy

Renewable energy/fuels or improve energy efficiency, electrification, and non-fossil cleaner fuels, organic
or natural materials that displace non-sustainable materials in products/processes, create or preserve
clean water, 14.0 technologies allowing energy utilities, co-ops, and transmission firms to operate more
efficiently.

Climatech

Reducing carbon dioxide, methane, and other harmful emissions, sequester CO2 into value added
products, provide adaption solutions to existing and expected impacts of climate change.

-135-

·

�Chapter 5: Economic Development
Recent Programs and Initiative~

The C3 Accelerator is a 6-12-month program providing a comprehensive set of support services to advance business and technical milestones. C3
is different from most accelerators, the program offers support with no formal cohort like most accelerators do. The Accelerator will be
organized each year and culminate in a business pitch showcase event to expose these promising companies to a large group of potential
customers, strategic partners, and investors to further support their growth specifically in the state of Michigan. Dedicated participation and
funding are in place to support underserved entrepreneurs including ventures led by women, minorities, veterans, and people with disabilities.
The goals laid out for the C3 Accelerator are simple:
1.

2.
3.
4.

To support Michigan-made products and Michigan supply chains to achieve a significant economic multiplier effect and sustain
Michigan's global competitiveness.
To be the most impactful, best-in-class hardware/physical product accelerator on the planet by generating meaningful and long lasting,
local economic development.
To develop hardware/physical products that advance sustainable renewable electricity, building energy efficiency, grid resiliency,
mobility/vehicle technologies, and other clean energy innovations.
To ensure the inclusion and success of all hardware/physical product entrepreneurs. We do this by partnering with community-based
organizations, universities, and professional/industry associations to continually identify and recruit promising underserved
entrepreneurs.

After careful consideration, the eligibility for the C3 Accelerator has been laid out as follows: Start-ups and established firms with unique
technology and/or business models. Michigan based firms, both start-ups and established firms with unique C3 technology and/or business
models. Companies from outside the state will have an opportunity to apply as the Evergreen Fund plans to globally crowdsource the best-inclass technology companies and use the Fund as a business attraction tool for the State of Michigan. Companies must demonstrate that their
technology can support the challenges and needs of Michigan partners, specifically State/County/City Departments, utilities, transmission firms,
manufacturing, and commercial companies. Companies from out of state will be required to set up Michigan operations to qualify for funding
including EGLE-derived grants.
C3 program service offerings include access to grants and loans to support business milestones, pilots and demos, Department of Energy (DOE)
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STIR) programs, connections to national labs, assistance
with the Michigan match assistance pilot program, product design, engineering, and prototyping, design for manufacturability, supply chain
support, supplier, customer, and strategic partner introductions, office and co-working space, free/discounted access to resource software,
free/discounted events and much more.

-136-

��--

~

...r
Chapter 5: Economic De\'clopmcnt
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

Key Trends &amp; Challenges

THE EVOLUTION OF THE EMPLOYEE

Continuing Pandemic Impacts

PAST

Remote Work

+-··---g

Work anytime

Wor1c9 ·S ~

The pandemic and Michigan State mandates changed the office work
environment overnight in March 2020. In May of 2021, employers are
now contemplating bringing employees back, albeit slowly, to the
workforce for in-person work because the State of Michigan and the CDC
will no longer need to require remote work for most employee's due to
higher levels of those getting the COVID-19 vaccines. Further, companies
are responding to employee concerns and comments regarding hybrid
"3-2-2" work schedules (in office and work from home options) that allow
for a greater work-life balance. The 3-2-2 schedule balance traditional
and remote work, where employees work for three days in office, two
days remote, and two days off. Employers are also embracing digital
nomads: a person who earns a living working online in various locations
of their choosing (rather than a fixed business location).
Some companies are considering a gradual return to work in 2022. Thus,
many companies are debating if they need more-or-less office space. As
a result, the uncertainty in the market is leading to lower rental rates.
Further, office developers are not building new speculative office
properties. Some of these changes were being contemplated before the
pandemic, but COVID-19 accelerated the future of work:
•

FUTURE

As companies get their employees back to the office, we are still
seeing a unsurety regarding the need for office space. Trends
include reduction ofoffice space by 25-30% due to live-work
home accommodations.

•

Office lease rates continue to decrease, and some predict we will
not see pre-pandemic rates return for 5 years.

•

Office development has slowed as owners try to fill newly vacant
space in their existing properties.
-138-

+-··
+-··

Work in a
corporate office ~

Use company
equipment

Work
anywhere

Use any
device

11'.:J

Focused on
inputs

Focused on
outputs

Climb the
corporate ladder

Create your
own ladder

Pre-defined

1~1

Customized
work

Hoards
information ~

Shares
information

+-··----+-··---work

"'--··---□
=
~
=□

+--·

----·· ➔

No
voice

Can become
a leader

+-··----

Relies on collaboration

Relies on

technologies

emailM

+-··---

@'

Focused on
knowledge

Focused on adaptive
learning

+-··---Corporate learning
and teaching

+-··--by Jacob Morgan

---- ·· ➔

tg:!

Democratized learning
and teaching

thefutureorganization.com

�Chapter 5: Economic Development
Key Findings

•

Employees are making life decisions based upon the "new normal,"
including decisions about child-care, home school, and other lifestyle
changes that fit with working from home. Much of the workforce indicated
a preference for some sort of hybrid work arrangement, working some
days in the office and others from home. 57

Nearly 6 in 10 American workers in an October [2021] survey by job search site
Linkedln said they had gone through a career awakening during the COVID-19
pandemic, whether it was a desire for better work-life balance, deciding to pursue
a promotion or redefining their means of success. 58

Changing Workforce Demographics
The United States population is growing older, and the nation's workforce is
reflecting these demographic changes. Today, people aged 65 and older represent
one of the highest U.S. labor force participation rates in the developed world. As a
result, some employers that typically depend on younger employees, such as retail
and restaurants, are projecting labor shortages. Many businesses are now
investing in older employee retention programs, such a better healthcare
packages, to keep a firm grasp on their knowledge base. Other businesses are
rethinking their model to make do with less employees overall. No matter the
approach a business is taking, it will be even more important to consider
demographics changes when planning for the economic future of Southfield.

-139-

�,-,.,r

J/lfllllF
Chapter 5: Economic Development
Key Finding~

Key Findings
Strengths and Opportunities
Adaptive Reuse Tools
The adoption and aggressive use of the RUDD, ODD, and MUCD tools puts Southfield in a strong position to facilitate and encourage more
adaptive reuse development projects across the city. Zoning always works best when it is proactive - having the appropriate tools ready
beforehand makes development simple and prevents the city from having to play catch-up to meet a project's needs. With the potential
emergence of more available school sites in the future, this is one of the city's greatest assets.

Weaknesses and Threats
Office Space Vacancies
Southfield has an overabundance of Class C Office Space that is vacant or underutilized. For more detail on the excess amount of Class C office
space in the city, please see the Key Findings section of Chapter 6.
DDA Finances
As mentioned above, the SODA is not currently generating enough revenue to pay for the projects it proposed and is currently what some
financial analysts call 11upside-down." This makes it difficult for the city to finance public placemaking projects and further improve the economic
conditions of the Northland area. Additionally, SODA funds are often needed to help incentivize large developments looking for local
infrastructure contributions. As such, the financial state of the SODA presents one of the greatest weaknesses going forward and great focus
must be put on helping it recover.

COVID-19
The pandemic has caused many companies to shift to an employee work from home or hybrid work from home and work in the office model
that is reducing the need for office space. Many start-up businesses and online retail businesses have reduced the need for traditional office
space and increased the need for storage use.

-140-

�Chapter 5: Economic DeYclopment
ioals. Objecth-cs, m1d Sb·atcgic~

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies
Goals
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Retain, expand, and attract businesses
Remain business-friendly and continue to provide business incentives to maintain an equal playing field
Support a more diverse economy and tax base
Encourage innovation and the growth of emerging business sectors
Develop local talent in an inclusive, diverse, and comprehensive ~atter
Improve the learning-to-job pipeline for people at all levels of secondary and post-secondary education
Attract and retain young professional and skilled older professionals
Cultivate external businesses relationships to connect to the regional economy
Establish and maintain housing, transportation, communication, and utility systems which foster quality development
Encourage development that is environmentally sensitive and sustainable

Objectives and Strategies
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Create programs and amenities that attract and retain young professionals
Investigate methods to support the increasingly remote workforce
Maintain Redevelopment Ready Communities (RRC) certification
Initiate sustainable urban (re)development strategies that foster green business growth and build reliance on local assets
Encourage the preservation of the city's historic assets, including historic neighborhoods, Mid-Century Modern buildings, and
the former Northland Center area
Provide start-up businesses with both financial and technical assistance
Recruit growing businesses that are suited to the region and are seeking a highly skilled work force or are willing to train an
entry-level work force
Continually upgrade technology infrastructure to meet future need
Provide information to local businesses about funding support and investment opportunities
Assist local firms in finding appropriate development sites for expansion
Facilitate the development of neighborhood business centers through land use and zoning
Cooperate with local educational institutions to coordinate training/skill requirements to meet the needs of local employers
Assist older adults in finding both paid and volunteer job opportunities
Identify the economic needs of the chronically unemployed and underemployed in the region and develop programming including education and retraining - to meet those needs

-141-

��Chapter&lt;&gt;: Existing and Future Land Use
Introduction

Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land Use
Introduction
The way we use our land determines our daily lives - whether we can walk to the grocery store, how far we must travel for work, and what it
looks like right outside our living room window. The placement and quantity of different land uses, such as retail and shops, medical offices and
outpatient clinics, parks, and more, affects how people experience Southfield every day. Examining where land uses are today and planning for
where they should be in the future is critical to shaping a city that supports the health, welling, prosperity, and happiness of all residents .

Background &amp; History
In the past 60 years, Southfield has grown from a rural farming community to one
of the leading business centers in Michigan and the Midwest. Few other
metropolitan areas can boast such a beautiful skyline, replete with golden
skyscrapers and high rises located just minutes away from quaint, tree-lined
neighborhoods. As we celebrate Southfield's history, we look fondly back on where
we have come as we look optimistically forward to where we are going.

Pre-1900s
Prior to settler arrival in Michigan, the land now containing Southfield was home
to several Indigenous villages of Neshnabek {Potawatomi). While much of the
Neshnabek land in southeast Michigan had been taken by the United States
government in the 1807 Treaty of Detroit, the Neshnabek had retained several
areas of land in Oakland County. These included two villages in Southfield
Township, the Seganchewan village in sections 8 and 9, and Tonquish's village in
sections 30 and 31, both in the western part of the township. A portion of the
Shiawassee Trail, an American Indian road running from just west of Detroit north
and west to the Saginaw River, ran through the southwest corner of the township
roughly along what is now Shiawassee Street. Both land reservations were taken
by the United States government in the 1827 Treaty of St. Joseph, in which this
land and other tracts were exchanged for consolidated land in Kalamazoo and St.
Joseph counties. For more information on the American Indian history of
Southfield, please see in the Indigenous History section of Chapter 1: Background .
-143-

�ChaJ&gt;lcr 6: Existing and Future Land Use
Rackground &amp; History

The first stable roads in the metropolitan area were Grand River and Woodward, and the first road to pass through the area now known as
Southfield was Shiawassee. These roads came to dictate trade throughout the area, and heavily influenced the largely agricultural development
of the area pre-1900s.

1900s to Present
Following the Depression and World War II, Southfield faced a period of potentially explosive growth when it developed as one of Detroit's first
inner-ring suburbs. Like many suburbs, this meant a rapid transformation from a largely agricultural area into an urbanized one, characterized by
detached single-family houses and low-density shopping centers. After incorporating in 1958, Southfield embarked on a series of planning
efforts to manage and encourage controlled growth.
On February 1, 1960, Southfield opened its own library in the former Brooks School building at 11 Mile and Lahser and soon after, in 1964, the
Southfield Civic Center opened, featuring a new Library, Parks and Recreation Building, Police Headquarters and City Hall. The Civic Center
Arena, with its swimming pool and indoor ice-skating facilities, was opened in 1970.
Beginning in 1978, the Civic Center facilities were expanded to include a new Public Safety Building, a Court Building and the Southfield Pavilion,
a multi-use facility with a capacity of 3,000 people. The Library, with a collection of over 150,000 books and other media, was also expanded to
include a separate non-fiction level and offices. A new state-of-the-art library opened in 2003 and offers extensive service to the residents of the
city.
Parks developed in the City include Cranbrook Park (1968), Optimist Park (1965), Lahser Woods Park (1970), Valley Woods Nature Preserve
(1972), Robbie Gage Memorial Park (1972), Evergreen Woods Nature Preserve (1975), Pebblecreek Park (1978), Catalpa Park (1978), Bedford
Woods Park (1978), and Inglenook Park (1981).

-144-

�Chapter 6: E.\.isting and Future I.and lTsc
Existing Land l s
T

0

Existing Land Use
About
The collection and analysis of existing land use and natural features information represents one of the most important steps in the
Comprehensive Plan update process. The analysis of such information not only identifies what and where particular uses exist, but also provides
insight as to where future development might occur, as well as where land use conflicts exist or may develop. Land use planning is the primary
tool communities use to correct or avoid land use conflicts and to create sustainable and supportive land use arrangements.
From September 28, 2020, through December 4, 2020, Planning Department Staff conducted a Land Use Survey of every property in the City of
Southfield to determine if the mapping from the previous Master Plan conducted in 2016 was still accurate. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic,
each Staff member was given 6 Sections of the City to review individually via a "Windshield Survey." Each staff member drove by each site in the
Sections they were given to confirm the land use indicated on the maps matched the actual land use character of the property based on the
Land Based Classification Standards (LBCS) system.
The result of the surveys found that, overall, the previous mapping was accurate though some properties did need to have their classifications
changed due to rezoning of properties that had occurred over the past 5 years, may have been mislabeled previously, the uses had changed, or
the structures on the sites may have been removed resulting in a "Vacant" classification. Any changes to property use were documented on the
current land use maps and updated with the help of the Engineering Department in the City's GIS (Geographic Information System) mapping
software for the City.
Land-Based Classification Standards provide a consistent model for classifying land uses based on their characteristics. The model extends the
notion of classifying land uses by refining traditional categories into multiple dimensions, such as activities, functions, building types, site
development character, and ownership constraints. Each dimension has its own set of categories and subcategories for classifying land uses. By
classifying every land-use across multiple dimensions, users can have precise control of land-use classifications.

QUICK DEFINITION - "ACTIVITY"
Activity refers to the actual use of land based on its observable characteristics. It describes what takes place in physical or observable terms (e.g., farming,
shopping, manufacturing, vehicular movement, etc.). An office activity, for example, refers only to the physical activity on the premises, which could apply
equally to a law firm, a nonprofit institution, a courthouse, a corporate office, or any other office use. Similarly, residential uses in single-family dwellings,
multifamily structures, manufactured houses, or any other type of building, would all be classified as residential activity.

-145-

�--- ,,,
Chapter 6: Existing and I•uture Land C.se
Existing Land Csc

The Existing Land Use Color Code
The Land Based Classification System classifies land use using a four-digit code and individual colors as follows:
Color ,

Code

Label

1000

Residential

1001

Multi-family
Residential
Hotels

2000

Business

3000

Industrial

4000

Public
Institutional

4500

Private
Institutional

5000

Roadways/
Travel and
Movement

Description

Example Activities

Includes activities that occur in single-family
residential uses or structures
Includes activities that occur in all types of residential
uses, structures, ownership characteristics, or the
character of the development

Single family and manufactured homes, hotels, tourist homes, and B &amp;
B's
Apartments, townhomes, triplexes, and other multi-family structures
such as dormitories or group homes
Hotels, motels, hostels

Includes all short-term stay uses
Includes all uses that are business related. Used as a
catch-all category for all retail, office, commercial, and
industrial activities
Includes all manufacturing, assembly, warehouse, and
waste management activities
Includes all publicly owned, institutional, or
infrastructure related activities

Retail shops, stores, restaurants, offices, and banks

Assembly plants, manufacturing facilities, industrial warehouses,
trucking, self-storage, solid waste, landfills, and recycling facilities
Educational facilities, schools, instructional and administrative
functions, public safety, utilities

Includes all privately owned, institutional, or
infrastructure related activities

Cemeteries, health care facilities, and military complexes

Includes all activities associated with all modes of
transportation. It includes rights-of-way and such
linear features associated with transportation,
including free standing parking lots.
Includes all activities associated with mass assembly of
people for either transportation, spectator sports,
entertainment, or other social and institutional
reasons

Pedestrian-only roads (such as open walking mall areas) that are in the
right-of-way, roads, parking areas, car washes, public transit yards and
stops, trains, and railroads

6000

Assembly

7000

Leisure

Includes all forms of leisure activities, both active and
passive

8000

Natural
Resources

Includes all agricultural activities for the production of
food and fiber products

9000

Vacant

No human or classifiable activity

-146-

Bus terminals, spectator sports stadiums and venues, movies, concert,
and entertainment venues, City Hall, religious institutions, museums,
libraries, and galleries
Bike paths, pathways, athletic tracks, playgrounds, trials, health clubs,
gymnasiums, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, ice rinks, golf,
parks, pools, and other recreational venues
Farming, cultivating and harvesting crops, feeding and raising of
livestock, forestry, mining, quarrying, drilling, and dredging. Excludes
forest logging and timber- harvesting operations but includes sod
production, nurseries, orchards, and Christmas tree plantations
Vacant lot where a house was demolished

�Map 13. Existing Land Use Map

C=:] 1!!1 1,ll,1,

Ill
111 .

_"IK I
II, •

Uu

1111 1 ~
111

In

,,o;

Ill i'-011, II,·

Iii!"

►1r- ... ( &lt;tllllllt ll I

L(

I{

11\r

l1ulu,..1ul, . ,

I\\, ,1

11111 1 1

t~"'' l'11lt

I,

n·. &lt;",·m,1t 1k \1,1,w,

,· 1'.1tli.,. 1
1;,I

C:l•NI·\

H.

•'11H&gt;

Ill

[=:)•1~1): 'l,,I\. D,k- 11

11

.,-.1

...,:

.!t

c..
.:,t.
r:i

w

C

.2:·

G

0

0.5

I indt - 2.8 ;o tn-1

�Chapter&lt;,: E,dsting and Future Land l lse
Existing Land lTs 1 •

Note that Existing Land Use maps differ from the Zoning District Maps - the Existing Land Use Maps drill down further to literal use of a land,
such as a gas station, grocery store, or dental office, while the Zoning Map just refers to general categories like commercial or residential.

Takeaways on Existing Land Use
Southfield Existing Land Uses 2021

Oakland County Existing Land Uses 2021

~AND
Y

COU N

M I C" ►ll G"AN

Land Use

I
I

I

I

I

I

Agricultural
Single FamiJy Residential
Multiple Family
Mobile Home Park
Com merctal/Office
Industrial
PubllcJlnstitutional
Recreation/Conservation
Transp.lUtility/Comm.
Extractive
Vacant
Water
Railroad Right-of-Way
Road Right-of-Way

LJ Agrtcultural
6,550.7
1,381 .0

38.9%
8 .2%

16,978
167

87.6%
0.9%

. Single Family Residential
Multiple Family
Mobile Home Park
I Commercial/Office
Industrial
I Public/Institutional
Recreation/Conservation
Transp./Utility/Comm .
Extractive
Vacant

I

2,057.9
445.6
1,455.7
814.0
275.3

12.2%
2.6%
8.7%
4.8%
1.6%

905

35

4.7%
0.9%
0.8%
0.6%
0.2%

709.7

4.2%
0.6%

853

4.4%

106.4

181
155
112

I

I
I

' Water
Railroad R1ght-0f-Way
I Road Right-of-Way
1

I

3,022.8

18.0%

• r.uti

Area (ac.) Area %)
25,325.6
4.4%
232,359.5
40.0%
2.4%
13,931 .0
3,302.8
0.6%
3.2%
18,564 .8
3.2%
18,867.7
3.6%
21 ,074 .1
14.6%
84,902.4
1.1%
6.285.4
5,581 .2
1.0%
53,658.1
9.2%
6.1%
35,248 .3
1,009.9
0.2%
61 ,393.3
10.6%

Parcels Parcels % )

693
371 ,822
2,412
237
12,860
5,903
3,104
7,235
1,215
98
27,738

1.7,o
0.3%
0.0%
6.4%

-J;ll.1,H1W 1111it»'Wl'~-lit'. . . .l'1till,,:,

By far, the City of Southfield is a residential community - 88.5% of land use is in Single Family and Multiple Family parcels and is on par with
Oakland County as a whole . 5.6% of land use is in Commercial and Industrial uses situated along Eight Mile, Telegraph Road and Northwestern
Highway; about 2% more than Oakland County. Recreation/Conservation uses only make up 0.6% of the city's land which is below Oakland
County area which is 1.7%.
With such a large residential community, access to more recreational opportunities in the form of pocket parks, neighborhood parks, trails and
greenways, and other amenities throughout the city should be explored for underserved parts of the community.

-148-

�~

~

-

~

~

Chaptl"r 6: Existing and Future I.and l Tsc
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

Key Trends &amp; Challenges
Limited Land
The City of Southfield has limited inventory of vacant land available for development that is not encumbered by woodlands, wetlands, or steep
slopes.

Excessive Amount of Class C Office Space
The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically reduced the need for office space as many people are now working from home, either full- or part-time.
As a champion of office space over the last decade, Southfield now faces the threat of having too much vacant office space with no interested
tenants. The pandemic has exacerbated the negative cycle that comes from having empty buildings. Low occupancy rates lead to a loss of
revenue for landlords, who - in turn - can no longer afford to invest the money in upkeeping empty buildings. Over time, the buildings
deteriorate and lose value, which in turn lower the city's tax base. Repurposing this office space to meet the needs of the modern workforce and
the desires of developers is going to be one of the largest challenges as the city looks to the future and the coming decades.

-149-

�Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land t 1sc
Key Findings

Key Findings
Strengths and Opportunities
Adaptive Reuse: RUDD &amp; School Sites
The City of Southfield has been supporting the adaptive reuse of former school sites through the creation of the RUDD district. These sites
present a key opportunity for the city because they are some of the very few large, contiguous parcels available in the city. As such, they are
some of the few sites where comprehensive planned developments are possible and are the most ideal sites for large multi-family and mixeduse projects. The city is already capitalizing on this opportunity and turning it into a strength today and will continue to do so if more school sites
become available for adaptive reuse in the future.
Shallow Office Lots
Lot depth Limitations on major east-west corridors (Nine, Ten, and Twelve Mile Roads) present an opportunity to change conventional zoning
districts to mixed-use, higher density residential. Thus, the City will develop regulations to create a flexible Mixed -Use Corridor District (MUCD)
to encourage adaptive reuse and infill development.

Weaknesses and Threats
Planning Commission Powers
Southfield is one of many cities across Michigan that decided long ago to give some of the decision-making powers typically held by the Planning
Commission to City Council. By state law, governing bodies (city councils, township boards, etc.) are always involved in some types of
development projects, such as property rezonings, that may have wide-reaching impacts. However, some governing bodies want to be more
involved in the other development projects that are happening in the community, and pass resolutions that increase the scope of their influence
regarding planning and zoning. Today, the Southfield City Council is the final authority on all site plans, special land uses, and other development
projects, while the Planning Commission simply issues recommendations to Council. This process is unusual compared to other Michigan
communities and means that developers must wait twice as long to get anything approved because each project must go through twice as many
meetings. Additionally, the State's RRC program requires that Planning Commissions have final decision-making authority for a community to
receive state funds. As it stands, the legislative arrangement in Southfield is costing developers time and money and may prevent the City from
claiming the state funds available through RRC, making it one of the largest weaknesses as the community looks to the future .

-150-

�- - ---

-

Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land Use
Future Land L'se

Future Land Use
About
Future land use categories are used to describe how the community wants a particular neighborhood or geographic area to feel in the future the variety of houses, shops, and amenities people want to see while walking down the street and the overall density of the area. Future land
use categories are often confused with zoning district categories, which prescribe exactly what type of structure is legally allowed, the standards
to which it must be built, and the uses that are permitted on each individual property. The Future Land Use Map does not prescribe legal zoning
classifications, but rather describes the general character that the community wants to achieve in different parts of the city. Future zoning
changes will be compared against the map to make sure they align with the community's aspirations. Southfield's Future Land Use Map serves
as the primary policy guide for future land use decisions, investment in public improvements, and coordination of public improvements and
private development. The map presents an idealized future indicated by the growth patterns in the city. It is the intent of the map to assist in the
orderly development and redevelopment of the city, and to assist the community in enhancing its vision for the future.
The factors involved in determining future land use include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Consistency with existing land use patterns.
Relationship to uses in surrounding communities to ensure compatibility at City
boundaries.
Reduction in incompatible land use relationships.
Creation of suitable land use transitions through intermediary uses like office between
single-family and larger scale commercial uses.
Suitability of the site for different land uses in terms of site size, features, and adjacent
uses.
Maintenance of aesthetic qualities that contribute to the community character and quality
of life.
Existing planning policies and zoning regulations.
Availability of infrastructure including utilities, roads, and community facilities.
Average daily traffic volumes on adjacent streets.
Preservation of natural features and consideration of the effects of development on the
environment.
Market conditions for various land uses.
Goals of the Plan that express the community character desired by residents.

-151-

QUICK DEFINITION - "DENSITY" VS
"BUILDING INTENSITY"
Density refers to the number of housing or
commercial units over a given area. For
example, an apartment building may have a
density of 12 housing units per acre, while a
detached single-family home may have a
density of 1 housing unit per acre. Density
always depends on the total size of a parcel.
Building intensity refers to how much built
area there is on the parcel and may be
expressed using a variety of measurements,
such as the building height, "bulk," or the
percentage of the parcel covered by a
building footprint. For example, a 30 -story
office building covering 90% of a parcel
would be considered high intensity, while a
2-story duplex covering 25% of a parcel
would be considered low-intensity.

.-.:

......

�Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land Use
Future Land ese

The Future Land Use Color Code
Complete description of the objective and general character associated with each color code, see the pages following the Future Land Use Map.
Color

!

Label

· Quick Description

Low Density Single-Family
Residential

Single-family homes on lots 20,000 sq. ft. or larger

Moderate Density Single-Family
Residential

Single-family homes on lots less than 20,000 sq. ft.

Low Density Multiple-Family
Residential
Moderate Density Multiple-Family
Residential
Local Mixed-Use
Regional Mixed-Use
Office/Research
Medical/ Educational Institutional
Light Industrial
Industrial
Private Parks and
Recreation/ Cemeteries
Public Parks and Recreation

Townhouses and multiple-family units, generally under two stories
Multiple-family units over two stories
Primarily business in nature, mixture of neighborhood commercial, service, and office with
accessory multiple-family uses
Entirely business in nature, mixture of large-scale commercial, service, and office
Corporate and medical offices, research facilities, TV stations
Regional college or hospital campuses
Wholesale, warehouse, and industrial operations with minimal external impacts
Wholesale, warehouse, and industrial operations
Privately owned or operated recreation facilities and open space
City-owned or operated recreation facilities and open space

,I

-152-

�Map 14. Future Land Use Map

--~~-

City f Lathrup \'ill.1

. . . . . EduatlClnlll

-

ltutle

. . . . lndu

o-

1

I

i11d1 - t.:Qo C('I

�ChaJ&gt;lcr &lt;&gt;: Existing and Future Land Us
Future Land Use

General Character Description

To protect the vitality and character of the existing Low Density Single-family Residential neighborhoods in the city, development in these areas
should continue to follow the traditional neighborhood design principles that currently prevail in these areas. Infill and redevelopment in
existing neighborhoods must be compatible with the surrounding environment, including massing, size, spacing and architectural styles that are
compatible with the surrounding established residential neighborhoods. Street design in new developments should include an interconnected
street system, sidewalks, street trees and adequate lighting. Green streets stormwater approaches incorporating bioretention and the use of
permeable surfacing in parking lanes or other low-volume areas should be considered and encouraged.
A unique low density single-family area is found on Farm brook Road, north of Twelve Mile Road between Franklin and Telegraph Roads. This
area has a distinct rural character and potential geological issues that need to be considered during any potential redevelopment. While the
density may be increased slightly, homes in this area should still fall within the low-density category and shall take advantage of the unique
water features. The design of Farmbrook Road shall retain its open and rural character.

-155-

�t.
Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land l ~sc
Future Land Use

Moderate Density Single-Family Residential
Single-family homes on lots less than 20,000 sq. ft.

Location

Most residential neighborhoods within Southfield fall into this
category.
Objective

Moderate Density Single-family Residential development contributes
to the goal of providing a larger variety of single-family housing types
and price ranges to accommodate residents in all stages of life. This
variety should include residential development designed to attract
young professionals from other areas to begin and grow their careers.
Furthermore, the higher density single-family residential development
allows for increased walkability and pedestrian connections to nearby
commercial, institutional, and civic uses.
Land Use

This designation is intended to accommodate single-family residential
development on lots that are smaller than half an acre. Lot sizes can
range from 7,500 sq. ft. up to 20,000 sq. ft and corresponds generally
with the R-A, R-T and R-1 through R-4 zoning districts. Accessory and
support uses such as small to moderate sized churches, parks and schools may be considered, provided they do not disrupt the character of
established neighborhoods. Such uses should be considered special land uses to ensure compatibility. Home occupations should also be
explored, as discussed in the Low Density Single-Family Residential category discussed on the previous page.
General Character Description

To protect the vitality of the existing Moderate Density Single-family Residential neighborhoods in the city, development in these areas should
continue to follow the traditional neighborhood design principles that currently prevail in these neighborhoods. Infill and redevelopment must
be compatible with the surrounding environment, including the massing, size, spacing and architectural styles that are compatible with the
surrounding established residential neighborhoods. Street design in new developments should include an interconnected street system,
sidewalks, street trees and adequate lighting. Green streets stormwater approaches incorporating bioretention and the use of permeable
surfacing in parking lanes or other low-volume areas should be considered and encouraged.
These neighborhoods face many challenges as the lots are often smaller than desired for modern home expansions or new development. Future
reinvestment in these neighborhoods will need to provide spacing between homes adequate for emergency service, while maintaining the
traditional neighborhood design principles that currently prevail.

-156-

�Chapter 6: E:\..isting and Future Land Use
Future Land Us

One unique area shown for moderate density single-family is along Nine Mile Road, just west of Telegraph Road which is a residential area
peppered with farm markets. Through the years, these markets have become part of the neighborhood ambiance. A special study for this area
by the City suggested the existing markets should be encouraged to remain, and that minor expansions to the uses would be considered with
corresponding improvements to the site to improve appearance and access. However, the markets are non-conforming, meaning the land is
zoned residential so no other business use is permitted. If the current uses cease, any redevelopment should be residential.
Another area that requires additional discussion is the eastern frontage on Evergreen Road between Nine Mile and Ten Mile Roads. Located
across the street from the Word of Faith Christian Center and accessed off a busy north-south arterial in the city, uses other than single-family
residential uses may be appropriate if well designed. Small scale office and multiple-family uses may be considered along this stretch if the
buildings are designed with a residential appearance and are well buffered from the established neighborhood to the east.

-157-

�...

-

_.-Chapter 6: Existing &lt;tnd Future Land Use
Future Land Use
Location

Low Density Multiple-Family Residential

Scattered throughout Southfield, Low Density Multiple-family
Residential uses are usually found on major roads and abutting nonresidential areas.

Townhouses and multiple-family units, generally under two stories

Objective

Low Density Multiple-family Residential is intended for residential
land uses at a higher intensity, or density, than the single-family
areas, with the objective to promote a mixture of housing
opportunities throughout the city. Multiple-family residential
development allows for increased walkability and pedestrian
connections to nearby commercial, institutional, and civic uses. The
Low Density Multiple-family Residential designation offers home
ownership possibilities not typical of higher density multiple-family
areas. This designation also works well as a transitional use by
buffering lower intensity single-family uses from higher intensity
commercial uses and roadways with higher traffic volumes.
Land Use

Intended land uses within Low Density Multiple-family Residential areas include attached single-family buildings, duplexes, or low density
multiple-family developments. This includes townhouses, attached condominiums, apartments, and senior housing developments under two
stories. The expected density range of this classification is up to 30 units per acre and corresponds with the R-T, RC, and RM zoning districts.
General Character Description

Low Density Multiple-family Residential development should include high-quality design that emphasizes pedestrian connections with
surrounding uses, provides alternative housing options, and act as a buffer between single-family neighborhoods and higher intensity uses.
Future development under this designation should be designed to maintain a neighborhood scale and character to limit potential adverse
impacts to adjacent single-family areas. New development should possess innovative design elements that are consistent with the residential
character of the City such as ranch-style units or stacked condominiums with individual entrances that are more common in owner-occupied
units. Some areas will be appropriate for cluster development to protect open space and preserve key natural features while still permitting
adequate density. The area on the east side of Berg Road north of Eight Mile Road is an example of a site that is suggested for cluster
development. Adhering to LID site design principles will be important to balance development with water quality and natural resource
protection.

-158-

�,_
Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land lJsc
Future ·1,and Use

Moderate Density Multiple-Family Residential
Multiple-family units over two stories

Location

Moderate Density Multiple-family Residential areas are generally
located on major roads such as along Telegraph and Greenfield
Roads, Northwestern Highway, or near activity nodes such as
Northland Mall and Providence Hospital. A residential market
analysis is recommended to determine the type and quantity of
various housing options needed and underserved in Southfield.
Objective

Moderate Density Multiple-family Residential development in
Southfield contributes to the goal of providing a wide variety of
housing types and price ranges to accommodate residents of all
lifestyles. Multiple-family development provides living options with
pedestrian connections to nearby commercial, institutional, and civic
uses. They provide both affordable housing in the City and homes for
those seeking low and no maintenance ownership opportunities.
These developments may also cater to the growing older age
segments of the population.
Land Use

Permitted land uses within Moderate Density Multiple-family
Residential areas include a variety of multiple-family developments, with a focus on apartment or loft complexes, senior housing over two
stories in height, and adaptive re-use of former school sites developed under the Residential Unit Development District (RUDD) provisions. The
expected density range of this classification is from 30 to 60 units per acre and corresponds with the RMM, RC, and RMU zoning districts.
General Character Description

Moderate Density Multiple-family Residential development should possess innovative design elements that are consistent with the character of
the City. Stormwater features suitable for higher-density settings and buildings, such as planter boxes, green roofs, and permeable surfacing are
encouraged. The design of the multiple-family buildings should complement adjacent single-family neighborhoods but may feature buildings
with first-floor communal entrances that emphasize pedestrian connections with nearby shopping and transportation opportunities.

-159-

�,,......

Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land Csc
Future Land Use

Local Mixed-Use
Primarily business in nature, mixture of neighborhood commercial,
service and office with accessory multiple-family uses

Location

Local Mixed-Use nodes are found strategically throughout the city. Primarily
located at intersections of the Mile Roads and corresponding north/south
arterials, Local Mixed-Use areas are also found along many of the Mile Roads,
Greenfield, Southfield, and Lahser Roads.
Objective

Local Mixed-Use areas provide convenient and easily accessible businesses
and services, along with alternative housing options in a concentrated area.
These nodes of activity are intended to include uses that support nearby
residential neighborhoods without adversely impacting the residents. The
localized, neighborhood configuration of these nodes promotes local trips and
walkability.
Land Use

Uses within Local Mixed-Use areas include a mixture of residential and nonresidential uses, both vertically and horizontally. This includes live/work units,
upper story residential units, attached townhouses, multiple-family buildings,
small-scale retail establishments of less than 20,000 square feet, personal service businesses, restaurants, and offices. Businesses considered
appropriate should conveniently serve the immediate neighborhoods, within a one-and-a-half-mile radius.
General Character Description

With a stronger focus on building form rather than land use, sites within the Local Mixed-Use designation should be integrated into surrounding
neighborhoods. This can be accomplished through traditional design elements that replicate the character of adjacent neighborhoods, promote
walkability within the area, and provide shared access whenever possible.
Redevelopment should focus on requiring consistent site upgrades as development occurs, including improved site design, stormwater
management, access management, building facades, streetscape elements, pedestrian access, public transit access and landscaping. Generally,
parking areas should be in the rear or side rather than in the front of the building. The scale and size of the developments in these areas should
be limited to promote a pedestrian scale environment, minimize traffic impacts and be compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. In addition,
adequate buffering shall be provided to minimize noise and light impacts on the residential neighborhoods. A couple of sites exist on Franklin
Road, just north of Telegraph that are currently used as single-family homes. Redevelopment of this area should consist of low intensity mixed
use residential and office, with the potential for some limited commercial uses. Any redevelopment of these sites will require deep buffers and
residential design to be consistent with the neighborhood to its west.
-160-

�Cha()tc.r 6: Existing and Fu lure Land l 1s•'
Future Land ( ·s

Location

Regional Mixed-Use centers are located around existing nodes of
activity at Northland Mall, certain sections of Eight Mile Road, along
Northwestern Highway and Telegraph north of 1-696. Many of these
areas are eligible for the Overlay Development District (ODD) tool.
See Chapter 5: Economic Development for more detail on ODDs.
Objective

Regional Mixed-Use uses tend to cater to automobile traffic from a
broader market area and provide a wide variety of businesses and
services to residents, employees, and visitors to the metro Detroit
region. These regional nodes of activity are intended to include uses
that support residential neighborhoods without adversely impacting
the residents.

land Use
Uses within Regional Mixed-Use areas promote a mixture of
residential and non-residential uses, both vertically and horizontally.
This includes live/work units, apartment complexes, adaptive reuse
of antiquated office buildings into loft apartments, senior housing, a
variety of large- and small-scale retail establishments, personal
service businesses, restaurants, and offices. These areas may contain hotels, movie theaters, drive-through restaurants, and dealerships as well.
The larger scale of these areas will require a large amount of floor space and parking, as they cater to a regional market.
General Character Description

Like the Local Mixed-Use designation, the focus in the Regional Mixed-Use designation is not particularly on use but on form and layout of the
site. Since much of these areas are already developed, the challenge will be in encouraging redevelopment and consistently requiring site
upgrades as development occurs. These upgrades include improved site design, access management strategies to liT.prove traffic circulation
both in the roadway and between businesses, pedestrian access, higher quality and diversified building facades, low impact design, storm water
management, sustainable landscaping, etc. New development should be of a unique design and architecture, with a mixture of uses to
strengthen these existing regional nodes.

-161-

�r' -

- -- --

_..

-- ....,... ....,....
Cha))ter 6: Existing and Future I.and l.lsc
Future Land llsc

Office/Research

Location

Corporate and medical offices, research facilities, TV stations

Office/Research uses are focused along the service drives to 1-696
and M -10 and within the American Commerce Center on Eleven Mile
Road .
Objective

Office/Research uses are important to the city as they diversify the
tax base, balance traffic flow associated with residential/commercial
uses, and provide employment opportunities.
Land Use

Representative uses include corporate headquarters, research
facilities and centers, technology or pilot testing facilities, microelectronic and biotechnology uses, and certain industrial research
operations that are compatible with others uses envisioned within
the designation along with a limited number of commercial uses.
General Character Description

While the definition of Office/Research is somewhat broad, the
intent is to concentrate certain compatible uses in a planned,
campus-like setting with more extensive landscaping, higher quality
architecture and more site amenities than typically found in general
industrial areas. Outdoor storage of materials and equipment is
limited, with screening required where it is to occur. Ancillary
commercial uses should only be permitted if the following criteria could be met:
•

The amount of commercial will not materially erode or diminish the property available for the Office/Research uses.

•
•

The commercial uses would include those to serve both nearby residents and employees and visitors to the Office/Research uses.
Traffic impacts could be addressed, as commercial uses tend to generate more traffic than Office/Research uses.

-162-

�haptcr 6: Existing and Future Land Use
Future Land l's

Location

Educational/Medical Institutions include the existing facilities and
planned expansion areas around larger medical institutions such as
Straith Hospital for Special Surgery, located on Lahser.
Objective

These institutions provide local choices for high quality medical and
educational opportunities located within the City of Southfield. In
addition, they serve as a regional draw for people to come to the city,
thereby enhancing the local economy.
Land Use

This category includes regional college and hospital campuses with a
complementary mixture of uses. Included in this category are Straith
Hospital and related offices, residences, and other ancillary uses.
General Character Description

These campuses are park-like settings with integrated site design and
access. Future expansion of these facilities should be consistent with
the existing campus, respect surrounding land uses, and provide a
balanced mixture of uses that minimizes off-site impacts.

-163-

�,.

-

__... _.....
Cha))tcr 6: Existing and Future Land l.Jsc
Future Land Csc

Light Industrial

Location

Wholesale, warehouse, and industrial operations with minimal external
impacts

Light Industrial areas are primarily situated in the southern portion of
the city, off Eight Mile Road (Bridge Industrial Park), off Lahser Road
(Southfield Business Park), and pockets on East Street,
Keefer/Hazelhurst area, and Mapleridge Ave .
Objective

Light Industrial is intended for a variety of lower intensity industrial
operations, such as light manufacturing, and assembly, research, and
technology and industrial offices. Light Industrial developments are
an important source of the employment and tax base and have
significantly less impact on surrounding areas than Industrial uses.
Land Use

Appropriate uses for the Light Industrial district include high-tech
industries, research laboratories, light assembly operations and
corporate offices. Commercial uses that support industrial activities
are encouraged in these areas. Heavy, smokestack industries and
large warehouse operations dependent on heavy trucking or rail are
not intended for this district.
General Character Description

Redevelopment of Light Industrial areas should include improved site design, access management tools, attractive building facades and
significant landscaping to establish a park-like setting. Similarly, new development should take the form of a design-controlled, industrial/
research park, with integrated site planning. The planned industrial centers provide an environment for a mix of office, commercial, light
industrial, and research uses within a controlled environment. External nuisances, such as noise and odors, should be minimized through design
and activity restrictions.

-164-

�,.
Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land Ps
Future Land llsc

Location

Industrial areas are limited to three distinct areas located off Eight
Mile Road .
Objective

Due to the city's access to major transportation routes, industrial uses
are anticipated to play an important role in the economy of the city.
While such uses are desirable in terms of tax base and job creation,
they must be located appropriately to limit adverse impacts to lower
intensity uses.
Land Use

This category is intended to accommodate higher intensity industrial
uses, such as manufacturing, major assembly of products, primary
metal industries, fuel or hazardous materials handling, truck terminals,
distribution facilities, and other similar uses, including auto-related
recycling facilities. Areas with facilities involved in chemical
production, heavy assembly, large warehousing, and trucking are
intended for this designation .
General Character Description

Areas with Industrial designations require special planning and site
design. The operation of these uses may involve heavy truck traffic,
outdoor storage, rail access, odors, and noise. As with the Light Industrial designation, site design, appearance and buffering are important to
ensure that such impacts are limited, especially where they abut residential land uses. Development and redevelopment of these areas should
concentrate on minimizing impacts by screening outdoor storage areas and facing overhead doors away from the street or neighboring
residential areas so that loading and unloading activities are not visible.

-165-

�,.,_....

...
Cha,p ter 6: Existing and Future Land Use
Future Land tTs 1 •
Location

Public Parks and Recreation uses are located throughout Southfield,
strategically located to best serve city residents.
Objective

...

Public Parks and Recreation facilities in the city are intended to provide
a wide variety of high quality passive and active park facilities in
locations that are convenient for residents and visitors alike. The City
has a separate Parks and Recreation Plan, which more specifically
discusses the existing and planned facilities and outlines goals and
objectives for maintaining the City's Parks system.
Land Use

Land uses included in the Public Parks and Recreation category are Cityowned or operated recreation facilities such as sports fields, golf
courses, playgrounds, pathways and nature trails, picnic areas, and open
space areas. A mixture of passive and active recreation is encouraged.
General Character Description

Preservation of open space and the availability of recreation facilities are
extremely important to city residents. This promotes a higher quality of
life and increases the desirability of the city. Parks should continue to
be integrated into the city's neighborhoods to create a unified system.
The sizes of the spaces should vary depending on their function.
Neighborhood parks and open space areas should be less than two acres
in size and areas serving the community should be upwards of five acres
in size. Parks and open spaces should offer opportunities for recreation,
picnicking and relaxing. Pedestrian accessibility should be accomplished through sidewalk connections to the neighborhoods and pathways
throughout the sites. Parks can also be co-designed to provide water quality and stormwater management benefits.
Vacant or underutilized sites and sites with significant natural features that are located next to existing parks should be explored by the city for
opportunities for park expansion and to develop a cohesive open space system.

-166-

�,.
hapter 6: EAisting and Future Land H~c
Future 1,and Us
1•

Location

Private Parks and Recreation uses include existing privately owned
facilities including the Plum Hollow Golf Club on the corner of Nine Mile
and Lahser Road and the Cranbrook Swim Club on Evergreen Road
south of Thirteen Mile Road. Holy Sepulchre Cemetery, located on Ten
Mile Road, west of Telegraph is an example of a large private cemetery
with significant open space.
Objective

Private Parks and Recreation facilities in the city provide recreation
opportunities that complement those provided by the Parks and
Recreation Department and provide residents with greater choices to
meet their recreation needs. Large cemeteries also provide wildlife
corridors and may contain large woodlots, wetlands and water
features, which should be protected and preserved.
Land Use

Land uses included in the Private Parks and Recreational category are
private recreation facilities such as golf courses, private clubs, athletic
fields, and indoor sports facilities.

-167-

�,._

...

- -Chapter 6: E~isting and Future Land Fsc
Goals, Objectives, and Strategic~

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies
Goals
o
o
o
o

Offer unified, well-organized, walkable residential neighborhoods that provide a variety of housing options, and recreational and
social opportunities, and community assets in a livable environment for the City's residents
Provide for an appropriate amount of mixed-use commercial, office, industrial, and recreational uses, located for convenience,
safety, and leisure, resulting in aesthetic business areas in the City
Provide for a mix of housing options for singles, families, and older adults with increased density, walkability, and mixed-use in
our neighborhoods and along major corridors in the City
Create a diversified and balanced mixture of land uses that will support the economic vitality, tax base, and livability of the City

Objectives and Strategies
o

o
o
o
o
o
o

Establish community engagement strategies to solicit ideas from our civic leaders, business community, and neighborhood
homeowner and condominium associations on creating economic vitality, walkability, and recreational opportunities throughout
the City
Regularly evaluate economic and market trends that will establish the land use policies and alternatives to be considered,
including demographic, socioeconomic, housing, and transportation trends
Identify economic sectors that have the potential to contribute to the type of economic development being sought by the City,
including addressing the needs of underserved populations and fostering growth in targeted industries
Identify the market prospects facing various real estate development and investment projects, particularly in locations that might
be targeted for growth and/or change
Create a procedure or practice to identify economic and fiscal implications of various policies or land use regulations
Align the Zoning Ordinance with the goals of the Master Plan
Streamline the approval process and work toward having site plans for permitted uses approved administratively or by the
Planning Commission

-168-

�Chapter 7: Sub-Area Plans
Art Title: Red Pole Park (background) by HED
&amp; Endeavor (foreground) by Signgraphix &amp; T.E.C. Jr.

�t,

Cha1&gt;ter 7: Sub-Area Plans
Introduction

Chapter 7: Sub-Area Plans
Introduction
The City of Southfield has several sub-area planning districts and corridors that warranted
detailed study by the Planning Department, Planning Commission and City Council because of
their uniqueness or changes in market conditions and land use. Each sub-area has its own plan
or development concept in place, many of which are currently underway.
Despite their free-standing nature, it is important to consider these sub-area plans within the
broader scope of the Master Plan. By looking at the plans together, the City can identify areas
of overlap, project opportunities, and get a better picture of the future of the community. It is
important that all the sub-area plans work together and to reflect their goals in the Master
Plan.
As shown in Map 15 on the following page, the City of Southfield has 10 sub-areas:
•

The Residential Unit Development District (RUDD) eligible areas

•

The Mixed-Use Corridor District (MUCD) eligible areas, which includes the 9-Mile
Corridor sub-area

•
•
•
•
•
•

The City Centre District (proposed)
The Northwestern Highway Corridor
The Smart Zone (aka Centrepolis) District
The Eight-Mile Boulevard Corridor
The Valley Woods Senior Campus
The Southfield Technology Corridor

•
•

The Southfield Downtown Development Area (DOA)
The North Southfield Road Corridor

Not all of these sub-area plans are discussed in the following chapter, but all have been
evaluated as a part of the Master Plan. The following chapter highlights the key findings from
the most pertinent sub-area plans, including the 2022 Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
which is considered a sub-area plan for the city since it covers select areas within the City
boundary.

-170-

�Chapter 6: Existing and Future Land l 1sc
Future I ,and Use

Future Land Use Category Descriptions

Low Density Single-Family Residential

Location

Single-family homes on lots 20,000 sq. ft. or larger

Primarily located in the southwest portion of the city, west of
Telegraph Road, south of Eleven Mile Road. Pockets also exist
between Nine Mile and Ten Mile just east of Telegraph, south of
Thirteen Mile Road between Southfield and Greenfield Roads, and in
the neighborhoods surrounding the Twelve Mile and Telegraph
intersection.
Objective

Low Density Single-Family Residential in Southfield should protect
the vitality of existing, high-quality neighborhoods. Areas located on
naturally constrained lands should promote use of an open space
clustered design to allow a reasonable number of homes while
preserving the area's natural resources and creating high-quality
neighborhoods.
Land Use

This designation is intended to accommodate single-family homes
on lots that are half an acre or larger and roughly corresponds with
the R-E zoning district. Where natural features constrain the buildable area of a development, clustered development with permanently
dedicated open space should be encouraged to preserve Southfield's natural resources. Accessory and support uses, such as small to moderate
sized churches, parks, and schools, may be considered, provided they do not disrupt the character of the neighborhoods. Such uses should be
considered special land uses within the single-family districts to ensure compatibility.
Home occupations in neighborhoods have been an item of discussion in the city. Southfield currently does not allow home occupations (except
for Group Child Care homes), a profession carried on by an occupant of a dwelling as a secondary use which is subservient to the main
residential use. Today's business climate lends itself to people working out of their homes, and most communities accommodate it, with some
parameters to ensure the residential nature of the neighborhood is protected. Regulations should be developed that permit small scale home
occupations provided they do not physically alter the appearance of the dwelling, do not increase traffic volumes, and do not require additional
parking.

-154-

�Map 15. Map of Sub-Areas in Southfield
"
Village

f

Bingham farms

:.--,

:.,

32
"'"
~

0

~-

;M

•t:!

•

~

City of Lathrup 'ill.a

or
.::.ti.

~

:..
.::.ti.

RI ·nn Eli!;ibk . 1t

,;

0

•.

lulu, Gr.tu· Rni1.i.liat1u11 Pl 11
.\fi.\l&lt;l-l "". Corri&lt;l11r- l&gt;i,tru t~IITDI ~:ii.'
C

[Z::J Pr-01 cd Cil\ CL11trc l) ln(I
[Z::J :\'t,r;h,,l·skm Ili!;ill, ,. Cor ' lur

t
C

E
!:::
:.:

~ • mart 'I.J. 11&lt;· Di trier
□ ~ .\lik Bhd Ct,1-rid r

GlnDr

D
D

\ 'illi:y " ·u,d .

·1u

r Canipns(omnmmt} Rnit..}jiniriun PlaJ1

&gt;111hfi ·Id T«lmolv~· Co

.

. uthfidd DU.\

□

't,nh • uuthflt.' Id Rd Coni It

1ile.
&gt;ii •_ Si.Mntn.11,1 . Dnlll02

~

t

i 3?0ZZ/

0

0.5

I
2

1 ind1 ,.. '2.

·o It: ·r

�~

...

Cha ptcr 7: Sub-Arca Plans
Current Suh-Arca Plans

Current Sub-Area Plans
Parks and Recreation Master Plan
The 2022 Parks and Recreation Master Plan is a road map for the Parks and Recreation Department's decisions (including facilities and
programming) over next five years, as well as projected future needs. The Plan gives the City a better understanding of the needs and wants for
parks, recreation, historic and cultural facilities, and programming going into the future. As Southfield experiences moderate growth, it is
important to know how many people will use recreational amenities, which programs they will participate in, and what type of facilities they
want and need. All Southfield parks are free and open to the public. Certain facilities {Evergreen Hills Golf Course, Beech Woods Recreational
Center, Southfield Sports Arena and Pool) are fully staffed and require an admission fee . While some facilities are available on a "per-use" basis,
other facilities are available as rentals by reservation (rooms and spaces at the Parks and Recreation Building and the Beech Woods Recreation
Center).
Overall, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan found that the city has a surplus of medium-size neighborhood parks but a deficiency of miniparks (aka pocket parks) and large community parks. Because of the city's large population and lack of large, contiguous open parcels that could
be developed, it is unlikely that new community parks will be built anytime soon. However, the city will continue making progress on acquiring
more mini-parks and general parkland in the future, to help correct the overall deficiency in open space. The Plan also evaluated which parts of
the city are currently lacking open space/parkland {shown below), which will be priority locations for new parks in the future.
The Plan also included an evaluation of all the recreation facilities managed by the city and the collection of extensive public input through
several online surveys. This information, combined with the analysis of the parklands, yielded the following five-year goals:
Pursue the parks and recreation priorities set forth in the city's significant planning and policy documents
Plan and implement improvements to enhance utilization of undeveloped or underdeveloped parks
Provide unique opportunities and diverse experiences
Protect and preserve the environment
Establish partnerships with organizations and neighboring communities
Continue best business practices for the management of all parks and facilities in Southfield
Create and maintain accessibility at all parks and facilities in Southfield
Focus on economic development principles that will continue to contribute to the development rind maintenance of city parks,
facilities, and special events
9.
Market and promote Southfield's parks and facilities to attract visitors of all ages
10. Encourage the preservation of historic resources in the city
11. Encourage methods and practices that will improve residents' overall quality of life

1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
6.
7.
8.

-172-

�Map 16. Parks and Recreation Assets Map

(=:J 1L

.,
:.,

••

::::c
~

..

C:J
1111 \\ ,dt1i,. .t..

..,
21

..ra.t l•nM

~

0

...,;

.;,&amp;.

Cit; of Lathrup Villa"

c..
.x
,,:

0

W 101111

I

d

i

r

r

r

r

r

w

I-

Le
1J

11

1

Redford

·""

:'

Tc

hip
l/l:ia22

it

()

i

I

o.l lllr:h

2.

·o l

,,

:!

�,..
Chapter 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Sub-Arcn Plans

Beech Woods Master Plan
The Beech Woods Master Plan is a specific park plan for Beech Woods, contained in a separate document but under the Parks and Recreation
planning scope. Beech Woods Park is an 83-acre community park located in the Southwest corner of Southfield and majority of the park is
occupied by a 9-hole golf course. Due to its size, Beech Woods is a unique asset for the city and has much more opportunity for flexible planning
than other parks. In May of 2021, public engagement began for the future of Beech Woods and project team members presented residents with
several different possible designs for the park. The final design is included below.
.T.S

Driving R.ln

10' Width Paved Trail

I ' Wldth Paved Tl
• . Width Adventure Trail
Pav.d Co-nn.ctlw Walks

Capitalizing on Beech Woods Park's active uses to the north and landscape to the south, the master plan design seeks harmony between these
two characters by weaving them together throughout the park. This will create a multi-generational destination whirh attracts daily community
use as well as regional users who visit for key programs and facilities.
Some key elements of the plan include:
•
•
•

Sustainable parking lot landscaping that captures stormwater
A 500+ person amphitheater
A food-service clubhouse with indoor and outdoor gathering spaces

-174-

�r--

...---

..-,-

...-,--.-

.,_--

.--,-

Chapter 7: Sub-Area Plans
Current Suh-Arca Plans

•
•
•
•

A splash pad and universally-accessible playground
Nature trails, complete with native plants to support wildlife habitat, and educational signage
A restored and enhanced stormwater management system composed of ponds, wetlands, and swales
Outdoor dining pods

Simms and Miller Parks Plans
Although smaller than Beech Woods, Simms and Miller Parks were two under-used neighborhood parks that were identified as needing their
own special plans. As such, in 2021, the Planning Department undertook creating plans to enhance these parks and turn t hem into desirable and
interesting amenities, rather than underused sport fields with no connecting paths. This effort focused on creating walkways throughout the
parks that connect the existing amenities (ballfields, pickleball and basketball courts, and playgrounds) and make it possible for people of all ages
and abilities to use the space. It also included the addition of amenities like trash cans, bike racks, and handicap parking spaces, plus the repair of
existing paved courts. In total, the redevelopment of Simms and Miller parks is expected to greatly enhance the lives of immediate neighbors
and increase their appeal to residents across the city.

,---~----1

I
I
I

-175-

�Chapter 7: Sub-Arca Plans
Current Sub-Arca Plans

City Centre Development Plan
Adopted in November of 2016, the Southfield City Centre Vision Plan is the guide for creating a pedestrianfriendly, mixed-use development in the site at the heart of the Southfield City Centre district to help attract and
retain professionals, to create and maintain a "sense of place," and to spur economic development. The City
Centre site is located directly across Evergreen Road from the municipal campus, just south of the Upper
Evergreen neighborhood. The plan is intended to set the vision for the development of the site by identifying
market potential, providing a set of design guidelines and imperatives for development, and offering an
illustrative vision of the site's full potential.

Sing!e-Farr. iy f-:ous ·r.g
,

~ac'led Corido 3c1 'd ing

;...oartment
f-(ote l enci Mot,e

The 2016 retail market analysis conducted by Gibbs Planning Group determined the amount of supportable
retail, the type of retail uses that should be encouraged, and the sales voiumes that development can achieve
in the Southfield City Centre study area . The analysis found that the eight-acre site can presently support up to
183,700 square feet of additional retail and restaurant development, generating as much as $52.7 million in
new sales, potentially growing to $58.5 million in consumer expenditure by 2021. The demand could partially
be absorbed by existing businesses and/or with the opening of 35 to 50 new restaurants and stores.
The 2016 residential market analysis conducted by Zimmerman/Volk Associates found that, from the market
perspective, up to 250 rental and for-sale, multi-family housing units can be supported within mixed use
redevelopment this site. Based on market preferences, the 250 units would include 203 rental apartments and
47 condominiums in four- or five-story buildings, with retail uses located on the ground floor. The analysis also
determined where the households with the potential to move to new housing units in the City Centre District
currently live (the "draw area"). Approximately 25% of the market potential are currently living in Southfield,
suggesting these residents prefer multi-family housing in a walkable, mixed-use environment but have settled

0:f.ce B-.; .d ~r-g

E,n•ng and Dr ~.•:,ig

r.ealth enc Social Serv-ce:;
Trensportar:on and

,

v, . •

Farkrng Gerege
De liver," Senrces
L•brery

Dor~.:ory Quer.ers
,

Go11ernmer.tc

Le 1;.ure Ac."v ty

Manufacturing

Rel"g ou~ a:.d Civic

Res dental Care Fee ; :·
,

V{arehou:;e er-,d Storage

Wholesa'e Trace
Other

-176-

�- · ---

--

_......
Chapter 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Suh-Arca Plans

for something else in the short term. Ultimately, the City Centre Development Plan yielded the following concept plan, expressed graphically. By
interweaving all of these elements, this concept is consistent with the market demand for retail and residential in a mixed -use environment in
four to five story buildings. Furthermore, this concept aligns with the City of Southfield's master plan which envisions the City Centre area as the
"business hub" of the city by fostering a dense, walkable, mixed-use district that will continue to attract and retain businesses and employees.
Map 17. City Centre Trail Map
MAP LEGEND
The nunwncAI keys for locations of highlighted works
of Public Art (PA) and Cultural SltH (CS) are noted In
the map legend and locations are marked on the map

For a descriptive 11st of all works of Public Art and 1111
Cultural Sites located along Southfield City centre Trail,
download the PocketSlghts app to your mobile device
and search "Southfield, Michigan" Two guided tours are
1,1allabIe

FREE-STANDING RESTAURANTS
S·l TGI Frldm
26299 E,ergrolQn Road

s-2· Ketby'.s KOl)('y Island
25050 N-)rthwwSlQm HIghwily
S-3: Wendy's
24999 N&lt;:-rth,•,estern H1gh'hi&gt;y

SHOPPING DISTRICTS
S◄ ·

ShoPPff at Par. Place
'.15203 to 25309 E, ..,grNn Road for corr.pie~ ~sting
vI~It grandsakwa com/property/shoppes-at-park-place
s-S: City C.ntrc. IJlaza
25100 EvergrHn Road
S,6 : City Centre II
25200 E, ..-grHn Road
S-7 Evergrffn Atrium Mark1&gt;tptac•

2G221 Evvrgrrin Road
S-8 Travoters Terrnce Retail Center
26555 E... e,green Road

HOTELS
H-1 Detro,t Mamon Southfield
27033 Northwestern Highway I 248 . 356 .7400
H 2. Courtyard By Marriott Detroit Southfl(&gt;ld
27027 Norlhwvstern Highway I 248 358 1222
H•J Comfort suites Southfield
24977 Northw,&gt;•tern Highway I 248 JS 7 9990
H•4 ' Holiday I1\n Express &amp; Suites - Southftold
25100 North.-.&lt;&gt;st11rn H;ghway I 248 3S0 2400

A
W

PUBLIC ART
PA·l Hlt&gt;
PA•2 " MODY 010'.
PA-3 I Al'f.SlAY or A COMMUNITY
PA•4 IIOV ANO SCAR
Pl-..ti• RED POLE PARK
PA·6 : PION[fR 1-'HILV II
PA•7 Pl.:OPHET
PA8PEACOCK
PA 9 l&gt;IV[USITY

Parking
Re:;trooms

G

CULTURAL SITES
CS •t SOUIHflUD h'Ef-01/MEO PRESBYTERIAN

H•5 Westin southfield Oetro,t
1500 Town Center I 248 827 4000

CHURCH
CS·:l SOUTHl'IUO CITY HALL
CS·!J MARV TH•: •Ml-'SON F_.RM
CS · ◄ l.AWRENCl' TECHNOLOC,ICAL UNIVER&lt;;ITY
CS !&gt; YEIC'RAN\ M[MORIAL GARDEN &amp;

H-6 sonesta sunp1y Suites Detroit• S(,uthflf!!d
1 Corporate Dm&lt;t I 248 945 0010

MONUMENI
CS-Ii soumnuo TOWN~HtP CEMCTERY
C!&gt;-7 llURC.H H1~TOFIICAl PAP

H•l Stavb11dge Suites &amp; H-ampton Inn
26060 ,'I. 26080 Nc.rtnwe6t$t'n H1ghwa;1

Trait Head

°' End Point

PA· tO Gh'AIITUl&gt;E
PA 11: YIN YAN(;
PA- 12: CITY OF SOUTHFICLO
PA-IS: SOUTllflCI C&gt; l&gt;fACE POLI.S
PA· t4 · THE AR I OFIJNITY
PA•IS (NUEAVOll
PA-16 STRIV•NG

-

e,~eRepau
!'.tat10n

- - - ,_
Propes~ Sri.red
• U,e Peth

·------·
Completl:ld
Bak&lt;&gt; lane

EV Charging
Station

CITY CENTRE TRAI L
• Completed Trail Leng th: 8.75 Milos

CS 8 CODC!HOU!»E
CS·ll POl:ICE MEMORIAL

• Trail Surface : Asphalt and Concr&lt;&gt;t,.

-177-

�Chapter 7: Sub-Area Plans
C'urrcnt Suh-Arca Plans

EverCentre

Currently, there is an 8.14-acre site located across from the Municipal Campus at the northwest corner of Evergreen Road and Civic Center
Drive. The following schematics were developed to encourage higher density mixed-use development at the subject site. Public Input survey
comments indicated interest in pedestrian and festive lighting and pop-up food vendors/kiosks for this property. Additionally, respondents felt
that the top three types of development pertinent for inclusion into the future development included restaurants, mixed-use development, and
entertainment venues.
Restaurant

Active Ground-Floor Retail
Restaurant

Throughout the site, the mixed-use buildings illustrate a total of 145,000 square
feet of ground-floor retail, helping to create contiguous areas of walkab:lity and
street life within the district. Retail is proposed in a mix of formats including
anchor retail (10,000-25,000 SF per space), in-line retail (1,500-5,000 SF per
space), and restaurants (2,000-7,000 SF per space) to support the demand and
needs of both residents and visitors. The selected location of anchor retailers
maximizes visibility from Evergreen Road and includes a small-format grocery
store.

Multi-Family Housing

• 1 .,..r~

I

Restaurant

I

In-Line Ret.ailers

-178-

,

I

....

,{

Upper Level Flats

The proposed concept offers upper level flats (apartments, condos) in a mixeduse environment, offering attractive living options to a diverse market audience,
consistent with the residential market analysis conducted as part of this plan. In
total, the concept averages 20 residential units per acre, helping create a critical
mass within the district that will be able to support and be supported by the
proposed mix of retail, commercial, and restaurant tenants

In-Line Retailers
Grocery Anchor

Upper Level Flats

Potential
Rooftop Deck
~

�·-----

-

-

,. . . - -·

I~

Chapter 7: Sub-Area Plans
Current Suh-Arca Plans
Hotel

Ground Floor Lobby/ Cafe
Shared BOH

I

A boutique hotel would be one of the region's few hospitality locations within a
walkable mixed-use environment. The illustrated design introduces a unique
architectural component intended to frame the public park, reinforce view
corridors and pedestrian connections, and offer a year-round galleria to be
activated with retail and public programming. Four upper levels provide+/- 125
rooms over a ground-floor lobby and retail, offering excellent views of the park
and the convenience of places to eat, shop, and relax within walking distance
during visitors' stay

Multi-Purpose Rooms

Flex Space
.....

"Flex space" is provided in response to the City's desire to offer a flexible
community-oriented component. This+/- 30,000 SF space is designed in concept
to include multi-purpose rooms, pre-function space, and utilize a shared back-ofhouse with the hotel to serve a multi-purpose role in the overall development.
Potential uses include special event space, performance venue, small business
incubator, professional meeting space, and/or classrooms.

-179-

Gard
Pati

.

.

Shared BOH

.

...

n Space

t

Hotel

�Chapter 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Sub-Arca Plans
Public Park

Open Space

The public park is a town square concept that acts as a central gathering place for
the new development and the district as a whole, seamlessly integrating
architecture and public life. The park provides+/- 28,300 SF of public open space,
activated by ground-floor retail and regular programming. Opportunities for
additional open space within the development include plazas for outdoor seating
and dining along the wide sidewalks. Several covered parking areas also provide
the potential for rooftop amenity space for residents and vegetated green roofs,
screening parking from residents' view and utilizing sustainable design practices

Garden
Patio

" 1 1 Potential
\ ~ ~oof!_op Deck

►

...-

•

Parking Deck

Parking

+/- 1,050 spaces for vehicular parking are provided in multiple formats, including
a five-level parking deck (850 spaces), covered garage parking for dedicated
grocery (55 spaces) and residential (65 spaces) use, and on-street parallel parking
{80 spaces).
Building upon the recent streetscape improvements led by the City of Southfield
in the district, this concept further connects streets and assets within the district
to establish a highly connected and attractive street network. The streets are
designed to enhance their function beyond their use for transportation, allowing
them to serve as vibrant public spaces with outdoor dining, movable seating, bike
parking, street trees and green stormwater infrastructure, and an intersection of
commerce and social activity

-180-

•

,,.

.._

►

.

Potenti
RooftoJ

On-Street Parki1
[all internal stre
Covered ,
[dedicat
grocery L

�----- ~
Chapter 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Suh-Area Plans

Centrepolis SmartZone Action Plan
Adopted in 2017, the Centrepolis SmartZone Action Plan provides a realistic road map of land use
planning, redevelopment, infill development, and specialized areas of development focused on
encouraging quality places, entrepreneurial networks, talent and creative business attraction, and
positive branding narratives. These components are essential to realizing the goals of new
development and local economic growth that supports the growth of the Southfield SmartZone.
The Southfield Centrepolis SmartZone is a 368-acre certified technology park. The original portion
of the park is located east of Telegraph Road, west of Inkster Road, and directly adjacent to 1-696 in
the northwest. The amended and expanded park now includes the 107-acre campus of Lawrence
Technological University. As of 2014, the area is primarily zoned RC Regional Center, with some B-2
Planned Business, B-3 General Business, TV-R Television-Radio Office-Studio, OS Office Service, NS
Neighborhood Business, and ERO Education Research - Office.
The analysis conducted as a port of the Action Plan found several strengths and weaknesses of the
SmartZone district, displayed graphically on Map 18.
Figure 22. land Use Breakdown within Centrepolis SmartZone

-

Multiple Family (5.4%)
Office (25 .8%)

•

Loca'I/Community Commercial (3.3%)

•

Regional Commercia l {12.4%)

•

Public/lnstitut1onal (6.4%}

•

Recreation/Conservation (4.1%)
Right-of-way (6.2%)

•

Transportation/Utilities/Communication (16.9%)
Vacant (19.5%)

-181-

QUICK DEFINITION - "CENTREPOLIS"
AND "SMARTZONE"
The Centrepolis Accelerator is a business
incubator, housed in Lawrence Tech
University, that is on a mission to
accelerate the growth of Michigan's
cleantech and advanced manufacturing
entrepreneurs by providing access to key
business and product development
resources.
SmartZones are State designated areas
that target the attraction of technology
based businesses. SmartZones support
high tech ventures such as biotech,
information technology and advanced
manufacturing. The Southfield Centrepolis
SmartZone is developed as integral
component of Automation Alley by
locating strategic employers, cooperative
programs, and initiatives within the zone in
order to design a center for jobs and
wealth creation. The City received approval
from the State of Michigan to amend and
extend the term of Centrepolis SmartZone.
The amended Development and Tax
Increment Financing Plan expands the
SmartZone to include the campus of
Lawrence Technological University and an
additional 234 acres of land contiguous
with the original SmartZone. The approval
of the Amended Plan also extends the term
of the SmartZone for 15 years until Fiscal
Year 2033/34.

�Chapter 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Suh-Area Plans

Map 18. Centrepolis Smartlone Concept Plan

*
-

GATEWAYS
•
•
•

Franklin and Eleven Mile
Eleven Mile and Inkster
Franklin and Northwestern

ASSETS
1. Pebble Creek
2. Natural wetlands and boardwal
3. Business headquarters
4. Hotels
5. Access from eastbound 1-696
Access to westbound 1-696

4t

OPPORTUNITIES
Wayfinding signage in SmartZone

8. Pebble Creek and Park
9.

Key redevelopment site

10. Reuse and infill opportunities
11. Interconnected parking
12. Streetscapes
on
American,
ranklin,

and Centre

CHALLENGES
13. Lack of connection/visibility tor
Pebble Creek Par

14. Lack cf amenities and services
15. Physical and visual barrier created
by 1-696
16. Army Reserve
17. Large surface parking lots

-182-

�-

__.,

......-

~

~

Chapter 7: Suh-Area Plans
Current Sub-Arca Plans

-

fl

_,,
, ...

...~~--..,,,,.,

~~
...___

OfTice B·.nld _rig
ding

Retail 3u1lo ng

~

, ,r.g
Ecucat ona l
f-:ea ith and Sx1al Se rvices

., ...

~

Aoartment

.. I

B

....

..
-

1111--..._
~

.,,
~

Trar.spo:tat,on a,.d U~11::

II

7
j,_.,

■

s

. .1

_...~
~ ,,,.., ~
.

-~r i

-&gt;

t

~

-'

,1

'~

-

,_

--..
,,
,.

\\

3-D View of Centrepolis SmartZone Buildings
Classified According to Use

Parking Ga rage
Del very Se n,, ces

Ultimately, the effort yielded the following action items, which are the joint responsibility of the City and
several other agencies, such as LTU:

L•bra

Dorm.:orv Q1.:ar:ers
,

Go ve m rnema
Le:sure Ac:Iv

Msnufactur;ng
Rel;g :ou;; ar-,d

2)
3)
4)

uv ,c

Res dent!a l Care Fae I :

,

1)

Ware house ar.d Storage

5)
6)
7)

Design and implement SmartZone streetscape and gateways at critical locations: Eleven Mile and
Inkster, Eleven Mile and Franklin, Franklin and 1-696, and American Drive at 1-696 exit. Incorporate
Centrepolis SmartZone branding into streetscape and gateways
Enact Zoning Ordinance amendments that support infill and redevelopment
Design and implement improved pedestrian access to and identification of Pebble Creek Park
Establish a SmartZone Wireless Access Zone. Use SmartZone Wireless Access Zone as a branding and
marketing opportunity
Implement SmartZone streetscape along American Drive, Franklin Road, and Centre Drive
Create an area-wide storm-water management system
Increase existing sidewalk on Eleven Mile Road to a 10-foot wide safety path

•/ hotesa le Trade

-183-

�C'hapkr 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Suh-Arca Plans

Mixed Use Corridor District (MUCD)
Many of Southfield's "Mile" roads (i.e., Nine, Ten, and Twelve Mile Roads}, especially in the eastern portion of the City, contain antiquated office
uses on shallow-depth lots. It is the intent of the city to create an innovative and flexible zoning overlay district to encourage adaptive reuse and
higher mixed-use redevelopment on these underutilized properties.
The intent of this district is to create a Mixed Use Corridor District (MUCD} regulations for the purposes of: encouraging the use of land in
accordance with its character and adaptability; to act as a buffer between adjoining non-residential and residential areas, and to ensure that
new development is compatible in use, scale, and design with the transitional function of the District; permit moderate-density, multiple-family
residential uses, along with small-scale commercial uses and mixed-use developments that will primarily serve the day-to-day needs of residents
in nearby neighborhoods and residential complexes; and encourages innovation in land use planning; providing enhanced housing, employment,
walkability, traffic circulation and recreational opportunities for the residents of Southfield; ensuring compatibility of design and use between
neighboring properties; and, encouraging development that is consistent with Sustainable Southfield 2.0J as amended.

-184-

�s:
0

'tl

....
~

s:C:

8
I

!:?!
'5'
0:

-

I

~

~

00

l:.
~

V,
I

0

VI

5·
V,

0

...
t:

~
tb'

ti:

D

�Chapter 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Suh-Arca Plans

Nine Mile Corridor
The Nine Mile Corridor Plan is a year-long project that began in the summer of 2022 and is intended to identify a preferred non-motorized
treatment for Nine Mile Road, stretching from 1-75 in Hazel Park to 1-275 in Farmington Hills. The project came about through a series of
meetings with the City Managers from each of the six cities along the corridor, Hazel Park, Ferndale, Oak Park, Southfield, Farmington, and
Farmington Hills, to discuss the opportunity for shared recreation assets within Southern Oakland County. Nine Mile Road connects each of
these communities with each other, is a locally owned roadway, and is nearby to a number of parks, recreation facilities, neighborhoods, and
business districts, making it a perfect corridor to enhance from a non-motorized transportation standpoint.
Map 20. Nine Mile Corridor Plan Study Area

~~~--~~~~c~~-~-~

"-.-.
~J·
· L----.~-- . 7L_ - ~~~~-~~~~-~-~~ -- ~~~~~o~~-•~w~--~o~~
i

..
Commur.!~Y L". undary

Study area

Comdorc,ttmt

N

A
-186-

0_ _. __

___.
2 _ _ _ _ _4 Mil9s

�- -Chapter 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Suh-Arca Plans

A community survey for the Nine Mile Corridor was conducted from October 17, 2022, to November 28, 2022, that included 727 total responses.
92.45% of users visit destinations along Nine Mile by car, but 32.3% of respondents also travel by bike, 7.4% walk, and 2.1% use public transport.
57.1% of respondents stated that they would use the corridor without car if non-motorized pathways were provided. When asked "what
improvements would encourage you to walk and bike more?" the top five responses included: "Places to sit and rest with shade" (48.8%);
"Protected Bike Lanes" (47%); "Landscaping and street trees" (46.2%); "Wider sidewalks" (42.6%) and "More public parks and public spaces"
(42.5%).
Table 3. Responses to Nine Mile Corridor Survey "What Improvements Would Encourage You to Walk and Bike More?"
Res~onse

Percentage

Places to sit and rest with-shade.

-

- _l_ - -- -

48.8%

-~

46.2%

Protected bike lanes
Landscapil)Q ~nd str_,eet

47.0%

tr~~

Wider sidewalks

-

Total Reseonses
-

. --

342

-

336

....

42 .6%

-

355

310

More public parks and public space~

42.5%

Separated pedestrian and bike paths

40.3%

293

36.0%

262

32 .6%

237

31.2%
---

227

Bike repair stations, including air pumps

17.3%

126

Road- diets
---- - Other

13.1%

95

13.3%

97

$triped, high_-viajQiJity crQ§,§W~lks __
Public art

- - .. --- -

-----

--

..,._

-

Lighting and emergency call boxes

- -

---

.

-

-

__ ---

1'---

•·- -

--- - - -~-- -

-

-

- -

-

~-

309

The Nine Mile Corridor Plan will explore the feasibility of a connected non-motorized pathway that will allow residents along the corridor to walk
and bike from end to end in a safe and comfortable way. It is also intended to serve as the backbone to a larger non-motorized network that
connects each community's parks, business districts, and other assets together. The outcome of the plan will include a recommended route for
the pathway, a preferred facility type, placemaking opportunities, and options to catalyze economic development. Additionally, the plan will
include funding opportunities and implementation strategies to assist each community in implementing the shared vision for the Nine Mile
Corridor.
Special emphasis will be given to the Nine Mile Corridor (aka Nine Mile Connectivity, Placemaking, and Recreation Corridor Project) for
placemaking, art, signage, pedestrian amenities, street facades, landscaping, and shared-use pathway development. Southfield is working with
many adjacent communities to develop a regional "Greenway Corridor" along Nine Mile Road linking the 1-75 and 1-275 freeways.
In February 2022, the City Council authorized approximately $319,000 for construction of a½ mile segment of shared-use (8-10 ft. wide)
pathway on the south side of 9 Mile, adjacent to Bauervic Woods Park, from Evergreen Road to Prescott, which was completed in November
2022.
-187-

�haptcr 7: Suh-Arca Plan~
Current Sub-Area Plans

Map 21. Existing Conditions on Nine Mile Road

s

?
~
~

ib1

lb'"

r-

-..!.~

~

~

(0

s

&lt;1)

~
g.

IQ

'O

-::,-

"'~

jg::,

i£

~

Q.

lJ

~

a,
::,-

iil

[

C:

~

::?,

Ill

a:

~

~

~

-

-

SOUTHFIELD
Exlstll!Q.£11cllltles

No lllk• Lan..

Slulnow Lane

llk•L-

l uffered Ilk• Lane

S hared UH Peth

Sidewalk

Map 22. Areas of Concern on Nine Mile Road
s

"'~

~

~

;;:.

[
i£

~
iil
-g.
~

f

~

~~

l

g,

i::,g

~

:;:,

~

i£

~

co

3-

[

0:

a:

C:

9

SOUTH Fl E LO
~re111 of.Conc;trn

H'9....,.vcrou•fl9

D-• tntenectton
-188-

�-

~

Chapter 7: Suh-Arca Plans
Current Suh-Area Plans

Map 23. Recommended Improvements on Nine Mile Road
~

:

~
~

~

~

~

Q)

a

,-

,,,

~

~

~

ca

~

~

~

~

~

10~

~

j

:)

g

~

s

::?I

i

~

~

!

~

111111111111111111111111111111 I

~
SOUTH Fl
!l!ICOm!!l•nd,d

strt,t"Sldt

lxl,Unv Sh•red

u.. ,-Hh

1111111111111111111111
AKOfflffl•nc:tR
P•111wa, Sid•

Sk:Mwalk lnllU

Map 24. Existing and Proposed Improvements on Nine Mile Road Between Lohse, and Greenfield Roads
1Ju;111n S1)1tm11

' 11,, l'.u,,·I

HIJ:l,1 uf\\-11\

e
• •

-

•

Tr.,11mS11)1
Tnuml """'"' \\/ Br11d1

Sliii11--c l•11'\(i l'ath

- - - 1-.11110),•cl Sl,:u."11•1··~•· 1',,11,

- - - S1drw.ill lfo111,~(;i fi ~1,k1

- - ,.,,'IM•ml rl\p,.• T l\l &gt;

,\ tl 'Cll
lt111&lt;

•

Eluol

,\11 l1151:11Jatiu11
G:ih"\1,l) h~IIIH'

-189-

�C'haJJtcr 7: Sub-Arca Plans
Goal~, Ohjeclfrcs, and Strategic~

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies
Goals
o
o
o
o
o
o

Establish viable and high-quality commercial, residential, and office districts that promote transit and pedestrian-friendly
development to connect those districts with each other and the surrounding community
Provide for high quality, integrated communities providing a diverse range of uses and development to sustain a diverse
economy, including offices, retail, entertainment, institutions, services, recreation and leisure, and restaurants
Respond to a growing market demand for walkable, vibrant communities with convenient transit linkages, proximity to jobs, and
access to nearby public services and spaces and activity-orient~d destinations
Continue to implement the individual goals and objectives of each Sub-Area Plan and their key redevelopment areas
Provide an environment conductive to and support of living, working, shopping, and entertainment
Strengthen the physical and social connections within and between communities

Objectives and Strategies
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Implement the Nine Mile Corridor connectivity objectives in coordination with adjacent communities (1-75 to 1-275)
Support the Oakland Community College redevelopment project
Provide for both vertical mixed-use ( lower floors of commercial and upper floors residential or office) and horizontal mixed use
on an entire block that allows residents to live, work, and play in the same general location
Improve the public realm through creation of context-sensitive built environment
Promote development strategies for the rehabilitation and re-purposing of existing structures, conservation, and
sustainable/green building design
Provide for a mixture of land uses, including retail and residential, that help to generate positive pedestrian activity in an area
Provide for a variety of housing options, including higher density mixed-use developments along our major corridors, where
development has been challenging due to shallow lots and obsolete buildings
Develop shared-use pathways throughout the City to connect users with public transit to key destinatiCl!'lS in the City and beyond
Identify and market opportunities sites for infill to take advantage of existing infrastructure and reduce the need for new facilities
Target development opportunities to nearby, compatible land uses to shorten trips and facilitate alternative modes of
transportation, such as walking, bicycling, and public transit

-190-

�I

1-1.
I.O
1-1.
I

I

��,.....-

~

Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Introduction

Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Introduction
Non-Motorized and Motorized Infrastructure
Southfield is a first-ring midwestern suburb, designed in mid-century to reflect the prosperity of a vehicle-centric world. Its land use patterns
ignored the needs of pedestrians, providing, at best, a fragmented system with sidewalks too narrow to accommodate both foot traffic and
cyclists. And, in areas not serviced by sidewalks, "goat paths" appeared from persistent trudging feet and bicycle wheels. In its modern design,
with 75 ft. building setbacks, sea of asphalt parking and fragmented pedestrian system, the city left behind those who couldn't drive or didn't
own a vehicle. What's worse, inadequate sidewalks make the city and many neighborhood services inaccessible for pedestrians, individuals with
disabilities, wheelchairs, and older adults. 65 years later, the city is still trying to overcome this very auto-dominated land-use pattern.
The City, in cooperation with the Southfield City Centre, has focused on making the City Centre district much more walkable through sidewalkgap infill, widening of pathways, and building non-motorized connected trails with pedestrian and bicycle amenities. The City Council and
residents have recognized this concerted effort and are now applying this formula to other parts of the city. As part of this Master Plan Update, a
critical review of land use and zoning regulations are needed to provide more opportunities for basic services within walking distance and
adjacent to our neighborhoods.

What Are Complete Streets?
According to Smart Growth America, "Complete Streets are streets for everyone." They are designed and operated to prioritize safety, comfort,
and access to destinations for all people who use the street, especially older adults, people living with disabilities, people who cannot afford or
do not have access to a car, and historically underrepresented communities. Complete Streets make it easy to cross the street, walk to shops,
jobs, and schools, bicycle to work, and move actively with assistive devices. There is no one design for a Complete Street because each one is
unique and responds to community context. A complete street may include sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), special bus lanes,
comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals,
curb extensions, narrower travel lanes, roundabouts, and more. 59 Although Southfield does not have a formal Complete Streets policy, Planning
and Engineering staff use complete street tenants in roadway projects to make sure the city is progressing on its path toward equity for all
residents.

-193-

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
lntrodt1ction

Stormwater and Green Infrastructure
Stormwater infrastructure, which includes green infrastructure, is
a form of public infrastructure that often goes unnoticed on a dry
day. However, these systems play a vital role in every community,
including Southfield, because Michigan is one of the most waterrich and rainy states in the country and getting wetter every year,
as shown in Figure 23. Stormwater infrastructure in legacy
communities, like Southfield, has traditionally consisted of solely
storm drains and pipes, which directly dispose of the water into
the Rouge River. However, impervious (vegetated) surfaces that
capture stormwater are now broadly considered to be a part of
Southfield's stormwater infrastructure system, because they help
control floods and naturally cleanse dirty runoff. These features,
such as rain gardens, wetlands, and swales, both improve water
quality and make the community more attractive by preserving
valuable recreation land and wildlife habitat, as well as lowering
air temperatures.

Figure 23. Historic Rainfa/12010 vs 2020
8
7
6
V')

(l)

-5
C

5
4
3

2

1

0
JAN

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

2010
27.72in

JUL AUG

SEP

OCT NOV DEC

-a- 2020
39.29 in

Sources: Oakland Water Authority

The City of Southfield's Storm Water Master Plan exists to guide
the management of storm water throughout the City. The first Storm Water Master Plan, developed in 1969, identified areas of the City that
could be drained by a system of proposed storm drains. By the late 1990s, much of the original plan had been implemented or was no longer
relevant. As storm water management priorities shifted from managing peak flows and controlling flooding, the City updated the Storm Water
Master Plan in 2001 and committed to regular updates of the plan every ten years. Over the past ten years, the topic of storm water
management has continued to evolve. The link between increased runoff volume (despite managing discharge rate and water quality) and
degradation of downstream surface water bodies has become a key issue in managing storm water runoff. Low-impact practices (managing
storm water at its source rather than on a site or regional-wide basis) have become a preferred method for managing storm water.
SEMCOG's Green Infrastructure Vision for Southeast Michigan is a framework that guides the preservation and future implementation of green
infrastructure in Southeast Michigan. The vision benchmarks the amount of green infrastructure in the region, identifies future green
infrastructure opportunities, and recommends strategic implementation approaches. The Vision details the various benefits of green
infrastructure, including economic value, water quality, air quality and recreation. 60 In 2012, Southfield used the Vision to create local Low
Impact Development {LID} Guidelines handbook, which promotes building policies designed to improve the health of both the residents and the
environment. LID uses the preservation of existing features, landscape-based techniques, and the construction of stormwater treatment best
management practices to protect natural functions and water quality. 61 These two documents, as well as Southfield's ordinances, master plan,
and internal technical Stormwater Management Plan, guide the future of stormwater infrastructure throughout the city.
-194-

�-

_,....-.r-

Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Introduction

RAI IN GARDENS
catch wat

pts

orates
. _infaH

S catc

nd

0

ba

SPAVter t

IN
s

SOIL BUILDING

tot

mulch and compos

115

holds 1m o1istu

-195-

�Chapter 8: Pub1ic Infrastructure
Introduction

Definitions
Green infrastructure is defined in two broad categories in Southeast Michigan. First, it includes
ecosystems that are present in the natural, undisturbed environment such as wetlands, woodlands,
prairies, and parks. The second category includes constructed or built green infrastructure such as
rain gardens, bioswales, community gardens, and agricultural lands. Both approaches to green
infrastructure are involved in the LID approach to site design. 62
Table 4. Low-Impact Design Terminology

LID Term
Community Garden
Conservation Easement
Critical Habitat or
Regionnlly Significant
Fenture

Ruin Gardens or
Bioswale
Green Roof

Riparian Corridor
lt\'etland
Floodplain
Urban Forest

Permeable Pavemen

Definition
. . .. land
. . and/or
. . residential
.. used. . to grow food but can also provide
Urban

.

ecological services. Example: Mary Thompson Farm
Public and private land designated for conservation in perpetuity.
Areas unique to Southeast Michigan that are critical to protect and
enhance, such as the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge and the
Rouge River corridor.
An attractive, sunken landscape filter planted with plants. Rain gardens
are designed to absorb storm water run-off from impervious surfaces such
as roofs and parking lots
Green roofs are roofs planted with vegetation that absorbs stormwater.
Green roofs provide a 50%-90% annual runoff reduction and reduce
energy for heating and cooling
Land that exists between water bodies (lakes, rivers, streams, and
wetlands) and higher dry upland areas (forests, fields, cities and suburban
property).
Michigan-designated wetlands, and constructed wetlands or other natural
features that provide similar functions
The area of low-lying ground adjacent to a river which flood during storms
or after the snow melts
Areas of tree canopy cover that exist in multiple forms throughout the
city, such as woodlots, private landscapes, street trees, and park trees
Paving surfaces that are made of either a porous material that enables
stormwater to flow through it, or nonporous blocks spaced so that water
can flow between the gaQS

-196-

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Introduction

Table S. Benefits of Green Infrastructure

What are the benefits of Green Infrastructure?
Water
Quality
Flooding
Water
Supply

1::1-

Green infrastructure reduces the amount of polluted stormwater runoff entering our rivers and lakes. In cities
with combined sewer systems, green infrastructure is being used to reduce sewer overflows during storms.

Green infrastructure can reduce flood risk by slowing and reducing stormwater runoff into waterways.

r.

Harvesting rainwater is good for outdoor irrigation and some indoor uses. Water infiltrated into the soil
~ recharges groundwater and increases flow into rivers.

I

Quality of
Life
Recreation
I

Economic
Growth

II
•

Green infrastructure provides aesthetic benefits to the area by increasing the amount of a community's green
space.

~ Green infrastructure can provide recreational and tourism opportunities including increased access to hiking,
. . hunting, fishing, and bird watching.

1B Green infrastructure can increase residential property values located near trails, parks, and waterways. In
-

addition, green infrastructure is one way to attract and retain the knowledge-based workforce in our region.

II
LJIII

Green infrastructure techniques along roads can also be used to slow traffic and provide a buffer between the
roadway and pedestrians.

I

Traffic
Calming

Habitat
~ Green infrastructure can provide needed links in habitat corridors to strengthen and support rare and important
Connections
plant and animal areas in the community.
-

- ---

-

Air Quality

Increased vegetation positively impacts air quality through carbon sequestration, the capture of fugitive dust,
and removal of air pollutants.

Individual
Health

Green infrastructure encourages outdoor physical activity, which can have a positive impact in fighting obesity
and chronic diseases.

Public
Finances

Green infrastructure can reduce a community's infrastructure costs by using natural systems rather than built
systems, and by avoiding building lengthy new stormwater pipes.

-

0

{,

11111

-- -

-

-

--

-

-

-

I

Energy and
Climate

Implementing techniques such as green roofs, increased tree plantings around buildings, converting turfgrass to
no-mow areas, and reclaiming stormwater for use onsite can reduce energy consumption and save money.

-197-

�Chapter 8: J&gt;uhlic Jnfrasl'ructurc
Introduction

Suitable Locations for Different Types of Green Infrastructure
Within the integrated network of green infrastructure are constructed green infrastructure techniques, sometimes referred to as low impact
development techniques. This category of green infrastructure includes constructed practices such as rain gardens, bioswales, native plant grow
zones, permeable pavement, green roofs and even community gardens.
These constructed practices play an important role within the green infrastructure network providing ecological, environmental, economic, and
social benefits. For example, these techniques primarily work to improve water quality by reducing stormwater runoff entering our water
resources. However, their characteristics and designs also lead to greater economic value of adjacent properties and improved recreational
opportunities with demonstrated habitat enhancements.
The recommended quantity of green infrastructure techniques is linked to the percentage of impervious surfaces in urban areas and subwatersheds. According to SEMCOG's 2010 data, Southfield's land cover consists of 42 .9% of impervious surfaces. High impervious areas result in
increased quantities of stormwater runoff pollutants, volume, and flow rates. Regional priorities for constructing these types of green
infrastructure techniques include areas with impervious cover greater than 10 percent.
The connection between constructed green infrastructure techniques to improved water quality, higher economic value, reduced infrastructure
costs, enhanced recreational opportunities, and advanced social benefits is demonstrated through numerous comparisons. The overarching
theme for achieving these benefits starts with incrementally implementing green infrastructure in highly impervious areas. Priority areas for
constructed green infrastructure techniques include:
•

•

•

•

Institutional properties include publicly-owned property such as municipal facilities and complexes, libraries, parks, schools, and

universities. The focus within these properties is to further assess opportunities to manage roof runoff and runoff from paved surfaces.
Additionally, large open space areas managed as turf may present options for constructing native plant grow zones in areas not
generally accessed by the public.
Major roadways are identified by their respective functional classification, but are generally represented by the major arterial roadways,
including local, county, and state. Local residential streets are not defined as a primary area of opportunity. Within major roadways,
constructing green infrastructure within the rights-of-way, either in existing open space or, where traffic data supports it, implementing
road diets with green infrastructure are some of the opportunities.
Parking lots, both publicly-owned and privately-owned, represent a major category of green infrastructure implementation
opportunities. Publicly-owned parking lots are included as part of the impervious cover within the institutional properties. Privatelyowned parking lots represent the larger commercial areas in the region. Constructing bioretention areas, bioswales, and porous
pavement are techniques that can significantly reduce stormwater runoff. From a planning perspective, inverted parking lot islands can
double as bioretention areas when coordinated with engineering design.
Riparian corridors are a consistent focus of opportunity throughout this vision . Expanding the forest and vegetated buffer adjacent to
local streams improves the local stream corridor, leading to higher quality stream habitat and aquatic diversity {SEMCOG, 2014) .

-198-

�- Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Introduction

Drinking Water and Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure
The City of Southfield purchases water from the Southeastern Oakland County Water Authority (SOCWA) at eleven locations. SOCWA provides
Great lakes Water Authority (GLWA) water through its member distribution systems to a population of 210,000 within a 56 square mile area.
Current members are Berkley, Beverly Hills, Bingham Farms, Birmingham, Clawson, Huntington Woods, Lathrup Village, Pleasant Ridge, Royal
Oak, and Southfield.
Southfield's source water comes from the Detroit River, situated within the Lake St. Clair, Clinton River, Detroit River, Rouge River, Ecorse River,
watersheds in the U.S. and parts of the Thames River, Little River, Turkey Creek and Sydenham watersheds in Canada. The sources of drinking
water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of
the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances
resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. Contaminants that may be present in source water include:
•
•
•
•
•

Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural

livestock operations, and wildlife.
Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can be naturally occurring or result from urban storm water runoff, industrial or
domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming.
Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban storm water runoff, and residential uses.
Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organics, which are by-products of industrial processes and petroleum
production, and can also come from gas stations, urban storm water runoff and septic systems.
Radioactive contaminants, which can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities.

In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regulations, which limit the number of certain contaminants in water provided
by public water systems. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water, which must
provide the same protection for public health. EGLE, in partnership with the U.S. Geological Survey, the Detroit Water and Sewerage
Department, and the Michigan Public Health Institute, performed a source water assessment in 2004 to determine the susceptibility of GLWA' s
Detroit River source water for potential contamination. The susceptibility rating is based on a seven-tiered scale and ranges from very low to
very high determined primarily using geologic sensitivity, water chemistry, and potential contaminant sources. The report described GLWA's
Detroit River intakes as highly susceptible to potential contamination . However, all four GLWA water treatment plants that service the city of
Detroit and draw water from the Detroit River have historically provided satisfactory treatment and meet drinking water standards.

-199-

-

�f'haJllcr 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Current Condit.ions

Current Conditions
Non-Motorized and Motorized Infrastructure
As conduits for pedestrians and connections to vital services, non-motorized assets are some of the
most important resources in any community. The cost of building and maintaining these facilities,
their importance to society, and the investment made by the community all place a high level of
responsibility to plan, build, and maintain these assets efficiently and effectively.

Non-Motorized
Bike facilities include bike-share stations, bike repair stations and bike racks. The Southfield City
Centre District currently supports 9 bike stations, 27 bikes, 3 bike repair stations, and dozens of
bike racks throughout the district and City. Further, the Zoning Ordinance requires that all new
development and major redevelopment install one bike rack that can accommodate at least four
bicycles. Schools and Universities are required to install more based upon their student population.
City of Southfield 2019 Non-Motorized Asset Management Plan

At the request of City Administration and the City Engineer, OHM prepared a plan in 2019-20
describing the City of Southfield's non-motorized assets, conditions, and Capital Improvements.
Overall, the City's non-motorized network consists of approximately 34 miles of non-motorized
facilities, of which 17 miles are on-street and 16 miles are off-street. It should be noted that there
are also approximately 170 miles of sidewalks within Southfield's subdivisions. However, these
assets are considered part of the City's pedestrian facilities, and as such, are to be maintained by
the adjacent property owner, per the City's sidewalk repair ordinance.
The condition of Southfield's on-street and off-street facilities break down as follows:
•

•

Approximately 50% of Southfield's on-street non-motorized facilities are in poor condition.
Of the remaining paths, most are in good condition (38%) and a small percentage (6%) are
in fair condition.
Approximately 60% of the City of Southfield's off-street non-motorized facilities are in
good condition, while 25% are rated fair, while 14% are rated in poor condition.

-200-

STUDY: BIKE SHARE SAVES THE U.S.
436 MILLION PUBLIC HEALTH DOLLARS
EVERY VEAR
BY KEA WILSON
"The long-term health benefits of using bike
share vastly outweigh the short-term risks,
even in the most polluted and cardominated U.S. cities, a new study finds and cities who invest in reducing those risks
by loosening car dominance can save even
more lives and millions in precious public
health dollars.
Riders themselves were saved a collective
total of 737 "disability adjusted life years,"
or years spent living with debilitating health
conditions such as cancer, dementia, and
ischemic heart disease, thanks to the
preventative power of active
transportation.
Famously, zero American residents died on
bike share vehicles from 2007 through
2014, and deaths on the mode are still rare.
"The more [bike share] users we attract,
and the more we improve the street
environment, the more we increase the
public health benefits."
(Source: STREETSBLOG USA, July 23, 2021)

�I
Map 22. New Pedestrian and Bike Pathways Since 2011
,.

♦

~

-;

.
Village of
Bingham Farms

franklin

.......
! ..

I

-

°""'

1.:

..

I

H

0

!

~

~

l'r,

~

::,
~

.
j
'

if l

C
D
D

f

&gt;.

-

~

11 lr.ul II I
llilidl ( u (' Hin:

. Ul&gt;I&gt;.\
n
\\'

/1:4 lk-inct
r

.:.c
,_

•

~

i

.
--- ':
..- .........
-..:: t----:-

!='
I

-

~

.-::·

l~l,1111.)

u

........... 1

...

.Jt

-

~

11Jli(B.613fL Li

011.)

..:,I.

8
b.31 nu.

••••---•-

o.;· nuJ

.

I.Otmi.)

I

1. i nu.)

lnu,I

I!

....

-

·......·-

i

I

I

1'

·----

:I

'.l I nu.I

'

.. _
·-.
----

--

:

Uetroit

I

.!I.'

iI

1111.

0

.

!

;ity of

• nu.I

iI ·
=

-&gt;

0

,,

I
! I

~ile

I
0

2

�I
Map 23. Existing and Proposed Non-Motorized Transportation Plan

1f1ekl 'Iran port. iou
&gt;

of

Villag of
Bingham Farm

rrank.Jin

C1.:1tll'I

i

f

;

t

......

-

-L..=.~

·-;

-..::-!

..

C

.-

•

c

:

Route

--

I ouldl'I U1kc

~U1l·

I . 10 mi.I

i.
I
){ 111c

i

(0.1 nu.I

!

l 111 \l'd Irail W.

-·
I

- j•

nu.I

Educatiot Fa ili1ic
• 011 1fidd P11Wil

!I

~
I,.,

f..

.

1

-

E.;u t

-

( 'oll • l'11i1 · ·,

-

Pm. e. hool (harm
Pub

(1

ii, \&lt;l111u1i!llrt11i1L· Ct•11k1

Uiood lk·w~1p111L·111

hod

~(lu

K dford

·1own- hip

fil
City of

troit

2

0

I inch. l.'tlO r

I

�Chapter 8: Public Jnfrastructur
Current Cond.i tions

Motorized

Road Quality
Southfield completes a pavement condition evaluation every two years using the Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) system, a 1 to
10 scale with 10 being a newly constructed surface and 1 being a completely failed surface. Southfield groups PASER scores into categories of
good (6-10), fair (4-5), and poor (1-3) when prioritizing road projects. The most recent evaluation was completed in 2020. The current estimated
spring 2022 conditions for Southfield's overall Road Network is 51% good, 27% fair, and 22% poor. This is consistent with the projections
assumed in 2014, when the Southfield Road Bond was passed by voters. The Road Bond dollars are expected to be fully expended after the
completion of 2022 road projects. A continued investment level of $GM - $7M annually is needed to slightly improve Southfield's Road Network
while preventing "failed" roads from staying in that category for more than 10 years.

Safe Streets for All
The U.S. Department of Transportation administers the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) discretionary program. Established by the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law (BIL), the program will provide $5-6 billion in grant monies over 5 years to qualifying entities (including cities) in order to
prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries. Development of a "Comprehensive Safety Action Plan" is required to receive planning, design, or
development support, and implementing projects identified within the Action Plan are eligible for funding. To access these funds, the city must:
•
•
•

Develop a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan
Conduct planning, design, and development activities in support of the Action Plan
Carry out projects and strategies identified in the Action Plan :
o Implementing improvements along an expanded multimodal network of reconfigured roads with separated bicycle lanes and
improved safety features for pedestrian crossings.
o Applying low-cost safety treatments such as rumble strips, wider edge lines, flashing beacons, and better signage along high-crash
rural corridors.
o Conducting speed management projects such as implementing traffic calming road design changes and setting appropriate speed
limits for all road users.
o Installing safety enhancements such as safer pedestrian crossings, sidewalks, and additional lighting for people walking, rolling, or
using mobility assistive devices.
o Addressing alcohol-impaired driving along key corridors through education, outreach, and publicized sobriety checkpoints on
weekends and holidays.
o Making street design changes informed by culturally competent education and community outreach.
o Creating safe routes to school and public transit services through multiple activities that lead to people safely walking, biking, and
rolling in underserved communities.

-203-

�,--

~

,...

,...... ....- ,-,,r
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Conditions

SEMCOG City of Southfield Traffic Crash Data
Within the city limits there are a total of 6,152 miles of
public road (including boundary roads). SEMCOG
utilizes crash data from the Michigan State Police
Criminal Justice Information Center, Michigan
Geographic Framework, and ACS and U.S. Census 2020.
Between 2017 to 2020, there was an overall
decreasing trend in the number of crashes within
Southfield, with an increase in 2021; however, this
trend was impacted by the effects of COVID-19 and the
subsequent closure of schools and businesses. This
trend was experienced by the SEMCOG region and
Oakland County as well. Similarly, the different
categories within crash severity, crash type, and crash
involvement have also generally experienced the same
trend.

Figure 24. City of Southfield Traffic Crashes, 2017-2021

.:

Sources : SEMCOG Crash and Road Data Dashboard

The highest percentage crash type within Southfield is Rear-End crashes {41.4%) which was 7% higher than the region {34.4%), followed by
Sideswipe crashes (19.7%) which was slightly higher than the region {18.3%) and Angle or Head-on/Left-turn {19.4%) which was lower than the
region (20% ). Young drivers {16 - 24) were involved in 31.1 % of the crashes that appeared in Southfield which was basically the same
percentage compared to the regional level {31.5%), intersections involvement accounted for 23.5%, which was much lower than the region
{33 .6%), and older drivers (65 and older) were involved in 19.6% of crashes which was also lower than the regional number {16.6%).
The intersection with the highest crash frequency is located at Southfield Road and Ten Mile Road. This location is ranked No. 4 in the county
and No. 9 in the region for the highest frequency intersections. From the data between 2017 and 2021, 49.2% of the crashes happened at this
location are Read End crashes, and the most significant factors continue to the crashes ( excluding Intersection) are Young Driver 16-24 {31.6%)
and Older Driver 65 and older {21. 7%). Even though the intersection had high number of crashes, 79 .5% of those crashes result in property
damages only, and the rest were listed in the Other Injury category, which indicates that no fatal or serious injury occurred at the location
between 2017-2021. It is likely that the increase in crashes in between 2020 and 2021 was caused by the pandemic. However, it is unknown
whether the increasing trend will continue or if we have reached a state of equilibrium and 2021 crash data represents the "new normal." The
top 10 highest crash intersections and road segments located in Southfield are mainly comprised of the Mile Roads, Telegraph Road (US-24),
Southfield Road, and Greenfield Road. These roads typically have high speed limits and are all classified as Arterial roadways, representing the
major roads with some of the highest volumes in the city boundaries.
-204-

�Chapter 8: Public Infrast.ructm·e
Current Conditions

Table 6. High Frequency Intersection Crash Rankings

Local Rank

1
2
3

County Rank

4

-·- --.-· 113
--- - - - - · - -

21

.
Intersection

Regional (SEMCOG) Rank

-

~

-

·-

48.8

l Twelve Mile &amp; Telegraph

~

23
-

.

-

--------

116

5

53

' 138

42.2

Twelve Mile &amp; Southfield
I

46

. ·-·

-

47

4

2017 2021

Southfield &amp; Ten Mile

9
- - - --

Annual Average
(
_
)

· - - -1

Twelve Mile &amp; Telegraph

36
--

-- ·- --

Southfield &amp; Thirteen Mile

28.4
-- -

73

6

---

- -- -

Twelve Mile &amp; Greenfield

191

29.4

25.4
----

77

7

78

8
- - - - ----

10

218
·-

87

9

-

- -

-

-- -

- - --

Lasher &amp; Eleven Mile

··----

24.6
-

- ·- --· -

24.2

-

244

----

91

Southfield &amp; Mount Vernon

208
·-------

251

- -- - - - - - - -

Twelve Mile &amp; Lasher

23 .. 4

Greenfield &amp; Eleven Mile

23.2

Intersections are ranked by number of traffic crashes and rankings do not account for traffic volume.

-205-

�1

l
1

•

•

l

•

(f)

~

CD

&lt;

CD
-,

;::::;:

"&lt;

•

V)

0

•

.,
C:

("')

ro

..

©

~
~

•

Q

"0
N

:-,...

•

N

s

~

V)

I

N
0

O"'I
I

m
~

ij

n

1--1

•

0

G)

.,QJn

....~

Q

Q

~

:::s

:,-

0..
VI

&lt;
,r
:E

.,ro

fb

•

~
o·

3

•

•

c::

Ill

Q
Q
Ill

•

::,-

•

fb

Ill

•

•

�...

....
-~c
:.

Q.,

•

oc
r..
c:.,

...

~

..c

~

•

•

•

•
•

L.

Q)

~

•

Q)

&gt;

.c
V)

ro

L.

u

(.!)

•
•

0

u

~

UJ
V)
Q)

u

L.

::,
0

0

•

V)

I

"
0

N

I

�I

~

-

Chapter 8: PuhJic Infrastructure
Current Conditions

Map 29. 2017-2021 Pedestrian Crashes

•
•

•

"fl

•
®

•

•

•
•
11

•

Severity

••
Source : SEMCOG Crash Viewer

-208-

®

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Conditions

Vision Zero
Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all. For too long,
we've considered traffic deaths and severe injuries to be inevitable side effects of modern life. While often referred to as "accidents," the reality
is that we can prevent these tragedies by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety as a public health issue.
Vision Zero recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related policies should be designed to ensure those
inevitable mistakes do not result in severe injuries or fatalities. This means that system designers and policymakers are expected to improve the
roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. Vision Zero is a
multidisciplinary approach, bringing together diverse and necessary stakeholders to address this complex problem. Vision Zero acknowledges
that many factors contribute to safe mobility - including roadway design, speeds, behaviors, technology, and policies - and sets clear goals to
achieve the shared goal of zero fatalities and severe injuries.

Stormwater and Green Infrastructure
Southfield has both a traditional stormwater system and several locations with new green infrastructure projects. The stormwater system is
partially combined with the sanitary sewer system, which means that excess stormwater flows into the sanitary sewer during heavy rain events
and the combined stream is dumped into the Rouge River. Combined systems were very popular to build in the early 19 th century, and many
Michigan communities still have them, despite the pollution they dump into shared waterways during storms. As such, the City of Southfield is
pursuing incremental system separations, which detach the sanitary sewer pipes from storm sewer pipes, reducing both pollution in the river
and the risk of basement back-ups due to overflows during large rain events. For more detail on recent separation projects, please see the
Current Projects and Initiatives section below.
Currently, the City of Southfield has 8 locations with municipally constructed green infrastructure, which all help capture and absorb rainwater
before it has a chance to become polluted and run directly into the Rouge River. These projects are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Carpenter Lake Nature Preserve : Permeable Pavers, Bioswale, and Wet Meadow
Valley Woods: Wetland and Step Pools
Inglenook: Permeable Parking Lot and Bioswale
Beech Woods: Greening Project
Evergreen Road : Permeable Pavers and Rain Garden
City Hall: South Parking Lot Permeable Pavement and Bioswale
Pebble Creek: Rain Garden
Tarr,arack Creek: Wetland Restoration Project
Lawrence Technological Un1vers1ty: Green Roof, Rain Gardens, Bioswale, Stormwater Harvesting, Permeable Pavement, and Riparian
Buffer Zones

-209-

�---

--

.-.r
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Conditions

Additionally, the Southfield Public Schools has its own stormwater management program, which focuses on containing stormwater at
educational campuses .63 As of 2015, Adler Elementary School, Eisenhower Elementary School, and Southfield -Lathrup High School all had on-site
rain gardens as a part of the district' s stormwater management efforts.64
Map 30. Green Infrastructure Projects
W 13 Mt!. Rd - - -

v~

~&lt;&gt;f_P..l!_\~lyl-!fils

(

ot Franl:lm

4

r

I

City of Lathrup \'"illage

I

ii

ui

•;

ii:
Green lnfra~tructur e Projecu

Rd

City P.11lu

1111 Rlve~. L:ill.~. Pondi, and Slrl!.lm_i.
Lincoln Dr
~

«

:

a,

., .

',()A.

W 10 Mile Rd

as

I"0

a:

Is
.

II)

•

-

Mount Vernon St

Project Locations
'0

«

ID
1

...
,:,

C:

i

NAME

2
3

I!

0

4
5

;;

~-

(j

~,~
Redfard TownsJup

E!

9

10
Crty of

DetrCllt

-210-

EverRreen Rd Pave rs/Rain Garden
Citv Hall South ParkinR Lot and Bioswale
Pebble Creek Rain Garden
Tamarack Stream Restoration

�Chapter 8: Public lnfra~tructnrc
urrent Conditions

Drinking Water and Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure
Southfield, as a recipient of water from the Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA}, is a part of source-water protection activities that include
chemical containment, spill response, and mercury reduction. GLWA participates in a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit
discharge program and has an emergency response management plan. In 2016, EGLE approved the GLWA Surface Water Intake Protection
Program plan. The programs include seven elements: roles and duties of government units and water supply agencies, delineation of a source
water protection areas, identification of potential of sources of contamination, management approaches for protection, contingency plans,
siting of new water sources, public participation, and public education activities. The City of Southfield works through the department of public
works to support these activities and advance the goals of the regional plan.
As of 2022, there are still select homes and neighborhoods (insert map) throughout the City that are not attached to the municipal drinking
water and sanitary sewer systems. These properties are under the jurisdiction of the Oakland County Health Division and undergo inspections
every three years. When one of these properties has a septic or well failure, they must either replace the failed system or have new pipes are
constructed to the property to bring them onto the City water and sewer system.
For all new construction projects or residential connections (after a system failure), the engineering company must follow the Southfield
Engineering Department's "Standards Details," which are standardized engineering specifications for water and sewer. The Standard Details
encompass most of the elements common to most construction projects. The City's Standard Details were developed to satisfy or exceed the
requirements of other agencies such as the Michigan Department of Transportation, the Road Commission for Oakland County, and the Oakland
County Drain Commission. These details are included, either by direct use or reference, as a requirement for all infrastructure improvement
projects constructed in the City of Southfield.
In 2021, The City of Southfield applied for and received a C2R2 (Consolidation and Contamination Risk Reduction) Grant through the Michigan
Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (EGLE} to install new water services in homes not connected to the City's water system in
the San Marino Subdivision. The C2R2 Grant will award approximately $1.22 million to facilitate the connection of new water lead service lines
to the remaining 99 homes (of 122 homes) within the San Marino subdivision to the City's water system and also disconnect the remaining 99
homes from the San Marino wellhead currently used for potable water.

-211-

�r ·-:,-

--

_____

_....
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Conditions

Public Art
In 2014, the City Council established a 9-member Southfield Public Arts Commission (the Commission has since expanded to 11 members). This
Commission's purpose is "to serve the public interest, convenience, and enjoyment through the promotion of the arts." The ordinance
defined "works of art" as:
• Sculpture - in any material or combination of materials
• Painting - all media, including portable and permanently affixed works such as murals and frescoes
• Photography
• Mosaics
• Mixed media - any combination of forms or media including collage
• Water features and fountains
• Streetscape and landscape features and elements, including signage, lighting, benches, clocks, kiosks, and planters.
In 2016, City Council established a public art requirement for all new real estate projects. Under this ordinance, developers are required to pay
0.5% of the total project cost (minimum $5,000) up to $12,500 for projects between $1 million and $2.5 million and 1% of the total project cost
up to $25,000 for projects in excess of $2.5 million, to be committed to the procurement and display of public art on the site.
Five exceptions were written into the ordinance:
•
•
•
•
•

Projects with a total cost less than $1 million
Renovations of less than $1 million
Residential projects containing fewer than four units
Instances when a developer donates a work of art that is approved by the Public Arts Commission
Instances when the requirement would be "contrary to law" as determined by the Director of Planning

-212-

�Chapter 8: Puhlic lnfrastructm·c
Current Programs and Initiative~

Current Programs and Initiatives
Pedestrian Enhancements
Art Installations
The following art installations have been installed in the Public Realm since 2016:
(A) Boulders at Carpenter Lake
(B) Boy and Bear
(C) C's (Centrpolis)
(D) City of Southfield
(E) Coasting the Baseline
(F) Diversity
(G) Endeavor
(H) Fins

(I) Gratitude
(J) Great Lakes Watering Hole
(K) LTU Barrier-Wall Murals
(L) Moby-Dick
(M) Motown Mural
(N) Peace Poles
(O) Peacock
(P) Pioneer Family II

(Q) Prophet
(R) Red Pole Park
(S) SFLD
(T) Striving
(U) Tapestry of Community (in progress)
(V) The Crowd
(W) Untitled (Seated Female Figure)
(X) Yin Yang

-213-

■

�.,
1

1

1

l

�Chapter 8: Puh1ic Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiatives

Recently constructed along the City Centre Trail adjacent to LTU is a multi-panel mosaic art installation by an acclaimed African American artist,
Dr. Hubert Massey, who engaged the community in a paint-by-numbers style collaborative art mural. A 14 ft tall obelisk titled "The Art of Unity"
by the same artist is also planned for installation on Eleven Mile Road, east of Lahser.

Dr. Massey, native of Flint, resident of Detroit, chronicled the story of the City of Southfield - past, present, and future - through the Tapestry of
A Community installation (for more information, please see the Introduction). To do this, he created three triptychs or massive works of public
art, each made up of three large panels for a total of nine panels. The visual narrative is located adjacent to Lawrence Technological University's
portion of the Southfield City Centre Trail. Seven of the panels have been completed.
"My main objective is to celebrate the community at its highest level," explains Dr. Massey. "To get people excited about wanting to come to
Southfield ... To get people curious as they drive on the expressway .... 'What's that color up there? What's happening up there?"' Dr. Massey
gathered what he calls "data" for his creation from residents at two virtual community forums. His goal is to have residents see themselves and
their history in his work of art. "I want to convey to people who are not from Southfield the story of the residents. That's my main thing."

-215-

�.--

.......

----

--

Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiatives

During the community forum, Dr. Massey didn't take notes. Instead, he sketched what the residents were describing: Southfield's downtown, a
man holding a giant gear, hands representing the city's diversity, the Rouge River. He is a storyteller, and unity is a theme in "Tapestry of a
Community." "I try to create a piece with multiple stories," he says, "but, it's one story when you look at it."

-216-

�Chapter 8: Pu'b lic Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiatives

Placemaking
The public realm is defined as the publicly owned places and spaces that belong to and are accessible by everyone. These can include municipal
streets and rights-of-way (ROW), lanes, squares, plazas, sidewalks, trails, parks, open spaces, waterfronts, public transit systems, conservation
areas, and civic buildings and institutions.
Since 2016, the City of Southfield, in partnership with the Southfield City Centre District Board, has made a concerted effort to improve
placemaking in the public realm, especially in the Southfield City Centre. Placemaking improvements include, but are not limited to: wider
sidewalks and pathways (6 to 10 ft wide); pedestrian respite stations (benches and trash receptacles); art installations; wayfinding and
interpretive signage; bike-share and bike repair stations, bird and bat houses; improved transit stops (including bus stop pads, key-walks,
benches, trash receptacles, bike racks and bus shelters), dog stations (dog waste and dog treats) ; etc. To take a virtual tour of public art located
in the Southfield City Centre : https.//pocketsights.com/tours/tour/Southf1eld Southfield CttY_ Centre~Walking~rratl ~5207
The new Northland City Center will also incorporate many of the following place making examples into their development plans.

City Center Improvements
The Southfield City Centre Trail is a new urban greenway that brings community-desired walkability to a suburb once hostile to any form of
transportation other than the car. Situated along a major urban freeway, the trail is now a welcoming venue for heart-healthy activity and
provides opportunities for human-to-human and human-to-nature interactions. Forming the backbone for additional trail development, the
Southfield City Centre Trail has spurred economic development and promotes civic
,Na\\~
engagement through community-building events in a space where people feel safe
Map
Satellite
and welcome. Carved away from years of suburban indifference toward the needs
of pedestrians, this 7.75-mile trail and shared-use pathway provides space and
access for diverse individuals to connect and collaborate.

C Cel\101 Of

!i'

5"
Ii'
IOM,~Rd

...,
Southfield C1tv Centr

-217-

�r-

~

..,._.-

--· - · --

~

_.,,.
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Programs and lnitiati\'es

Since the City Centre Trail was established, the Crohn's &amp; Colitis
Foundation has made the district home for their annual Take Steps
sponsored walk, bringing as many as 1,800 participants on a summer
Saturday each year. Additional organizations and community walks that
took place in 2020 and 2021 include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

MLK Peace Walk Celebration (MLK holiday Mondays)
Prayer March (6/6/20)
Kneel to Heal (6/14/21)
Black Lives Matter: Black Men Unite (6/28/20)
Mayor's Juneteenth Freedom Walk (6/20/2020 and 6/19/2021)
Michigan Association of Planning Conference City Centre Trail
Tour (10/1/21)
Walk To Raise Awareness of Domestic Violence (10/3/ 21)
AOL's Walk Against Hate (10/10/21)

The City also installed many respite stations, urban plazas, and gathering
spaces to encourage "community collisions." When you see a neighbor as
you pass in a car, you may only be able to nod your head or wave hello.
But when you're out walking, you can engage with each other and stop
and chat. The lending library, kiosk, and directional signs also encourage
community engagement.
Apart from organized activities, the trail is available every day year-round
for strolling, running, cycling, dog walking, and nature observing. For
modern individuals who spend most of their lives in artificial
environments and office spaces, the Southfield City Centre Trail
encourages health and vitality through fresh air and nature for every one
of every age in the community, just steps away from the front door.
By taking a 10-minute walk, individuals in 10 million square feet of office
and high-density mixed-use space can reap the physical and mental health
benefits of nature: reduced stress, increased attention, and enhanced
creativity. The greenway trail provides more than 30,000 office workers,
residents, students, and visitors the chance to engage with nature yearround on accessible half-mile looped paths that wind through outdoor

-218-

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiutivcs

"rooms." In the past 2 years (2020-2021), we have seen a renewed interest in walking in a safe and socially distant environment due to COVID19.
Users of the trail can educate themselves about the value of urban wildlife and plant amenities and environmental sustainability through
interpretive panels placed along the route, a resource that enhances knowledge, and therefore stewardship, of outdoor resources. It is within
the public realm that we can have the greatest impact on daily lives where people of all abilities, incomes, and backgrounds can meet, gather,
and enjoy the outdoors.
The trail system addresses the legacy of inequality by promoting walkability and equal access for non-motorized movement. In addition, the City
Centre Trail fundamentally provides for social equity and inclusion by giving lower income populations and persons with disabilities the ability to
safely travel to nearby work centers, educational opportunities, and health facilities.
Finally, the City Centre trail system, with its wide shared-use pathways, coordinated benches and trash receptacles, attractive and accessible
wayfinding, bicycle fix-it stations, art, whimsical bird houses, interpretive panels, and numerous other pedestrian amenities, has transformed a
largely vehicle-centric corridor into a safe and welcoming place for non-motorized traffic.
Front Lawn Redevelopment

As a part of the trail network, the front lawn of the municipal campus was redeveloped as a fitness loop. The 8 ft-wide walkway encourages
more pedestrian activity from members of the community and was a step towards achieving the vision of City Centre as a walkable environment.
3.33 circuits of the loop add up approximately to one mile or 20-minutes of heart healthy activity. The new walkway makes the front lawn
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible for visitors, employees, and residents. It also allows more families with children in strollers
access to events on the lawn. The loop now includes trash receptacles,
benches, and public art as well, to support healthy living and
enjoyment on the Civic Center lawn. For more information on
recreation offerings in Southfield, see Chapter 3: Healthy Living.
As a way to revitalize the front lawn, the City is working on pursuing
grant funding through the Michigan Economic Development
Corporation (MEDC) in order to provide better access to the municipal
campus, promote social events, and resolve some of the ongoing
flooding issues. In conjunction with remodeling portions of the
Southfield Public Library, the proposed Civic Center Lawn
Improvement project has the potential to be a landmark event space
in the City. The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed in
several phases with an estimated total of $8,000,000.

-219-

�-

.--

-- ---~.......

~

Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
CUJ-rcnt. Programs and Initiatives

Proposed City Centre Lawn Improvements

South Lawn

North Lawn

-220-

�Chapter 8: Pub]ic Infrastructure
Current Programs and .I nitiatives

DESCRIPTION
Phase 1

The Promenade + Utilities

$1,700,000

Phase 2A

The Commons

$800,000

Phase 2B

North Lawn + Library

$1,800,000

Phase 3

South Lawn

$1,500,000

SUBTOTAL
Phase 4

Permanent Stage

GRAND TOTAL

-221-

$5,800,000

$2,200,000
$8,000,000

�l
l

l
l

l

l
1
I

N
N
N
I

�Chapter 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiatives

Red Pole Park
Once the first phase of the Southfield City Centre Trail was developed, the city
needed something to draw people's attention to this new pathway segment and
to make a bold statement. The concept of Red Pole Park came out of the need to
create a gateway feature, starting point, and landmark destination to heighten
the pedestrian experience and driver awareness. Much like a lighthouse signals
landfall to traveling vessels, Red Pole Park serves as a modern beacon along the
trail. Blue solar powered marine navigation lights were added to the tops of
several poles, which come on every night and blink like fireflies.
The first set of telephone poles were surplus and recycled poles abandoned after
a large ice storm in the area that were donated by DTE Energy utility company.
Initial fundraising for the project came through a 2017 Patronicity crowd-funding
campaign and a matching grant through the Michigan Economic Development
Corporation's (MEDC) Public Spaces Community Places initiative that raised over
$100,000. The City had six weeks to raise $50,000 to receive the "all or nothing"
$50,000 match. Ultimately, the City raised over $55,000 from donations from
individuals and corporate sponsors representing 3,665 individuals. Corporate
sponsors were capped at $10,000 each .
The various heights of the poles, stumps, and dots along the pathway represent a
conscious choice to embrace civic values in the community. To foster
sustainability, stewardship and education, the park represents past histories,
present goals and future growth of Southfield that will be nurtured by future
generations.
Red was a primary color selected not only for being highly visible, but
representing vibrancy, strength, love, and passion that inspires citizens to action.
The grouping of the poles represents an abstract grove of trees as one walks
through a forest trail.
The 140-linear foot section of pathway containing Red Pole Park, has 65 used
telephone poles measuring 35 ft above ground laid out in a diagonal grid. Due to
many underground utilities in the area, bench high stumps and red dots were
applied across the asphalt path to strengthen the grid where poles could not be
installed.
-223-

�....--

,__..

............... ........ ...,...
Chapter 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiatives

Bat and Bird Houses
Within the City Centre and along its pathways, architecturally styled birdhouses provide shelter for wildlife and serve as natural conversation
starters. In addition, purple martin birdhouses and 5 new bat houses help to control mosquitos and other insects; bats can eat up to 1,000
mosquitos per hour. Moreover, Michigan bats feed on a variety of moths, flies, beetles, and other insects. Without a healthy bat population,
plants are placed at risk from invasive insects and humans are at risk of disease as the number of mosquitoes rise. By providing dry, safe houses
for bats to sleep, we can help our ecosystem .

-224-

�Chapter 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiatives

Dog Stations

COVID-19 lead to an explosion of pet adoptions, especially with dogs and encourage people to lead more
active lifestyles. As many people started walking their dogs more while working from home, the City
realized more dog-related infrastructure was necessary along public trails. As such, the Planning
Department is recently installed 2 free dog treat stations along the City Centre trail. If successful, more
stations may be installed in other locations.
You Can Signs

Most parks and public spaces have signs with a long list of "No's," i.e. No ball playing, No skate boarding,
No Fun, etc. To encourage fun, community, and healthy living, Southfield added two "You Can Signs"
along the Civic Centre Trail.

~.~•==Ti

T- , .
·om~nc

ascaBoarJ

~O~:VI~

f--_

r

ll*

;E~I

l

I

-225-

�.---

..--

,...., ....- ,...,,..
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiatives

Non-Motorized and Motorized Infrastructure
Wayfinding and Interpretive Signage
The City has recently installed updated wayfinding signage in the City Centre district to make recreation, tourism, and being outside simple and
enjoyable for both residents and visitors.

w.yfinding/Dire&lt;.lional

Blki. &amp; Pl!destt1•n Poth

Pedestrian Path

al

a.

Gatewoy Sign

G;ite~y Sign • Conden~d

Ped!Ktrlan Path Econo

S.kP

w

B
P11destrian Gat"WilY Sign

Interpretive Ponti

ThreeSldfd Kto!okw/Rod

-226-

Interior Information Oi,pl•y

,(/&gt;
Two Sid..,j K,c~k w / R

'You can·s19n,

Trdll Marker•

&lt;I&gt;

lw, c;,,dwd K, ~k

�J

Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure.'
urrent Programs and Initiatives

Pedestrian Respite Stations
Pedestrian respite stations include benches, accessible pads for wheelchairs and trash
receptacles placed approximately 1/8 of a mile apart. Strategically placed benches signal a
welcoming atmosphere, and, according to a 2017 survey by Center for Active Design, can even
help build public trust, increase public satisfaction, and encourage public participation. 65

-227-

�~

~

.--

,--.

,....,

............. ....-

~

ChaJ&gt;lcr 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Programs and Iniliati\'cs

Upcoming Road Projects
Map 31. Current and Upcoming Transportation Projects

r-------------W 1l llllie ltd
;;

1

10

7

,
Jti

1

W12111;lelld

•
J
C011strnc:tio11 Year
W 11 lllile Rd

y

19

20

...

a:

- - - 2022

I
...a:

=

1

- - - 202·1

!'

j

~ (

202:~

ii

Future
WtOIIIJlelld
'!I

30

...

a:

J

29

2

8
...a:

~

I

~

\\
~

c::::,(

82

3
~hie

··--..~....

ll

U"'

J'&lt;J.l!..'!J,.

-228-

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Progrmns and Initiatives

Traffic Calming
Traffic calming uses physical design and other measures to
improve safety for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. It
has become a tool to combat speeding and other unsafe
behaviors of drivers in the neighborhoods. It aims to
encourage safer, more responsible driving and potentially
reduce traffic flow. Traffic calming measures are grouped
within four categories: horizontal deflection, vertical
deflection, street width reduction, and routing restriction.
The category descriptions and the measures they include
are presented below.
A horizontal deflection hinders the ability of a motorist to
drive in a straight line by creating a horizontal shift in the
roadway. This shift forces a motorist to slow the vehicle to
comfortably navigate the measure :

•
•
•
•
•
•

Lateral shift
Chicane
Realigned intersection
Traffic circle
Small modern roundabout and mini
roundabout
Roundabout

A vertical deflection creates a change in the height of the
roadway that forces a motorist to slow down to maintain
an acceptable level of comfort:

•
•
•
•
•
•

Speed hump
Speed cushion
Speed table
Offset speed table
Raised crosswalk
Raised intersection

-229-

�,-

~

~

....

....-· ........ ....-

.....- .....Chapter 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Cm·rcnt Programs and Initiatives

A street width reduction narrows the width of a
vehicle travel lane. As a result, a motorist slows
the vehicle to maintain an acceptable level of
comfort and safety. The measure can also
reduce the distance that a pedestrian travels to
cross a street, reducing exposure to
pedestrian/vehicle conflicts:
•
•
•
•
•

Corner extension (i.e., a curb extension
at an intersection)
Choker (i.e., a midblock curb extension)
Median island
On-street parking
Road diet

A routing restriction deters cut-through traffic
at intersections:

•
•

•
•
•

Diagonal diverter
Full closure
Half closure
Median barrier
Forced turn island

Southfield traffic calming examples include:
•

•
•

•

Mid-block chokes, bump-ins, and mini-roundabouts: On Winchester, traffic calming was completed with a scheduled water main

replacement and road improvement project in 2018. This included midblock chokers, intersection bump-ins and a mini-roundabout.
Speed studies confirmed a decrease in speeds after the measures were installed.
Roundabouts: These were installed along Bell Road in 2016 to remedy speeding and a stop-controlled intersection that was frequently
violated. Two previous round-a-bouts were installed on Evergreen Road in 2016.
Speed humps: This option was discussed with Neighborhood Services Committee in July 2021. As a result, a demonstration project for
speed humps along 5 local streets proposed: 2 roads will have asphalt speed humps and 3 other roads will each have different style
manufactured speed humps. Installation to be complete in spring 2022.
Speed Table: A speed table was installed in at the now vacated portion of Jeanette to limit traffic into the Evershire neighborhood from
the City Centre commercial district but has been removed to allow emergency vehicles and public works quick access.
-230-

�Chapter 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiath'cs

Bus Stop Improvements
In 2019, the Planning Department completed a comprehensive review of 402 bus stops throughout the City evaluating each for transit
propensity utilizing 7 variables:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Density within¼ mile on each side of transit stops
% of population of older adults located within walking distance of transit routes
% of population of persons with disabilities located within walking distance of transit routes
% of population of low income located within walking distance of transit routes
Households with one or no vehicles
Ridership data provided by SMART and DDOT
Transfer locations

As a result, the City Council authorized Metro-Act funds to make improvements City-wide base upon priorities established in the study. Map 32
demonstrates the study's findings across the city.

-231-

�-

..... ----

.......-

~

.....,.

~

~

'111111'7
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Programs and lnitiati\'cs

Map 32. Priority Bus Stop Improvements

~

· Id

"

Miks

\\

I

,u-·

...,f

·1

- ~·t..,n,
-. ,,.,

I

•...~~

I

• , L ;·

J ,'.~ -: ,,_

•

0

I

• ,.

•·...r~ J
' ,.

,

..

. .j

:H :

........
... -.:r

\ ··::_-· l

o..;11.•-----·-

•

fl•

'.: 1~ -t
t -'• -

,,

...

•, _,.,

....
ffj

Priority

'\

! \ l ......

;1114

Bus Stops

us

0.25

~.

. !:

....

r,
.,-

~rt•

•• ::- !&gt;.~ .....

., . .. ,.
iu

.,,

-

Ml

~

V '.1

!

-- .. ···• •

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

2
3
4

5
6

: l

Associated Amenities

.

'" .

•

•f

,: : i,

....... l

......
~

i

)

\ \

~

:..,

~,,.

j

J

\.

'

T

'

1.

1'

,.,

"

.

i

.....

";•• ...r

_' , ... ,:

I

~

.....

•,-s

~

~.,
""
•
""

,.._

·- e

~

'·..

' ,~:~f_j•'
··:1

~i

Medium 3-5
Keywalk, pad, bench,
trash
High 6-7

...•

G

..,,i

-

Low 0-2
Keywalk

l "• •

- -~ !'!

'-.

.~ !

\

3

I

: '

~

t -. ~"I•

it

I · ··

1

\

,,¥

.. .f

t
t

Keywalk, pad, bench,
trash, shelter

l

'

-232-

�Chapter 8: J&gt;uhJic Infrastructure
Current Pro~rams and Initiatives

Bus Stop Priority Plan (5-Vear - 2019)
Year1

Year2

•

•

Begin high priority
•
•
•
•
•

6 keywalks:
18pads:
15 benches:
13 trash receptacles:
14 shelters:

Total:

$8,700
S18,000
S26,400
520,400
S238,000

•

Year3

Complete high priority
• 4 benches:
• 4 trash receptacles:
• 4 shelters:

•
•
•
•

39 keywalks:
39 pads:
39 benches:
39 trash receptacles:

Total:

•

Total:

•
•
•
•

$56,550
$39,000
$85,800
$66,300

50 keywalks:
50 pads:
50 benches:
50 trash receptacles:

Total:

S72,500
S50,000
S110,000
S85,000
$317,500

$331,250

Year 5

Continue medium priority
•
•
•
•

Continue medium priority

Begin medium priority

$311,500

Year4

•
$8,800
$6,800
$68,000

34 keywalks:
55 pads:
55 benches:
55 trash receptacles:

•

Complete medium priority

$49,300
$55,000
$121 ,000
$93,500

•
•
•

$318,800 •

44 pads:
51 benches:
51 trash receptacles:

$44,000
$112,200
$86,700

Begin and complete low priority
•

59 keywalks:

Grand Total:
$85,550

Total:

$328,450

-233-

• Low:
• Medium:
• High:

$85,550
$1,126,850
$395,100
$1,607,500

�- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiatives

Stormwater and Green Infrastructure
Green Infrastructure Ordinance
In 2017, Southfield amended the Zoning Ordinance to include, encourage, and accommodate green infrastructure. The amendment created
regulations for green infrastructure and low impact development methods, as well as revised storm water management, landscape, and parking
standards, conditions, and general requirements. The update included definitions for a wide variety of green infrastructure features and
required additional detail for development projects, including the production of a stormwater management plan and landscaping plan for
developments that meet certain criteria for level of intensity. 66

Tree City USA Program
As a Tree City USA, the City's tree planting programs help to
reduce urban temperatures, lower air pollution, and slow
stormwater flows into waterways. City planners make every
effort to save (or replant) as many trees as possible with every
proposed site plan. Over 1,000 new trees have been planted
along streets and highways in Southfield. Southfield residents
may also take advantage of the Trees for Southfield program
where shade, flowering, or evergreen trees may be purchased
at-cost by Southfield residents and delivered right to their
home. Southfield landscape maintenance programs are also
"Earth-Friendly" to minimize surface water pollution, including
mowing high, recycling turf grass clippings, using integrated pest
management, and low phosphorus and slow-release nitrogen
fertilizers. The City has also developed standard tree planting
guidelines for developers, to make improving the urban forest
simple and easy. 67

Public Education on Riparian Corridors
The City has partnered with Beverly Hills, Birmingham, Oakland County, SOCWA, and non-profits to develop both a public education program
and a conservation management plan for the main Branch of the Rouge River. The effort is intended to preserve and protect the resource for
water quality and public enjoyment.

-234-

�Chapter 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Current Pro~ram~ and lnitiatin~s

Drinking Water and Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure
Infrastructure Asset Management Program
In 2020, SEMCOG worked with local communities and agencies to collect data on underground water infrastructure: drinking water, sanitary
sewer, and stormwater systems. The agency is currently in the process of analyzing the data to develop regional metrics of overall water
infrastructure condition and investment needs. The goal of this study was to quantify the investment gap in the region's water infrastructure
systems in the region and to begin identifying funding opportunities for asset owners. 68

Construction Projects
At the time of this Master Plan, Southfield has five ongoing/recent water and sanitary sewer infrastructure projects. These projects, as well as a
description of each, are explained below.
Table 7. Priority Water Construction Projects

Project
Lctkc Ravines Subdivision
Section 24 Area 4: Soutlt/ield
Village Estates and Sherfield
Place
Section 25 Arca 10: Addison,
New Hampshire, George
Washington, Fairfax, Harden,
and Arbor
Section 25Areas 7&amp; 8: 1~en
Mile Road/Pierce Avenue
Intersection
Section 35: Melrose, Avcdon,
Stahelin, and Greenview

Scope of Improvements
Water Main replacement
Asphalt road rehabilitation
Improvements to stormwater outfalls
Sewer separation
Water main replacement
Road reconstruction
$13.2M investment
Water main replacement
Combined sewers will be separated and sanitary flow will be directed to pump station at Ten Mile and
Pierce
Storm leads will be made available for each home to connect sump pump lines
Water main replacement
Separating sanitary flow from storm water flow plus new sanitary pipe installation on some streets
Reconstruction of streets in concrete, including approaches
Water main replacement including upgrading 6" mains to 8" mains
Small amounts of storm sewer installations
Rehabilitation of asphalt streets by pulverizing existing asphalt and topping with 4" of a new asphalt road

-235-

�-

- - --- -- --- ..,..,.

~
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Current Programs and Initiath·cs

GLWA Water Residential Assistance Program {WRAP)
The WRAP program provides direct assistance to low-income Southfield homeowners who have aging plumbing infrastructure, water bills, or
other general water needs. The program offers clients services such as a home water audit, plumbing repairs, water saving kits, and bill payment
assistance. This is supplemented by the City of Southfield Water Department, which offers free energy audits, rebates, and equipment that can
lower water bills.
Connection Assistance
The City provides two forms of assistance four properties that need or want to connect to City water and sanitary sewer. The first is a lowinterest loan for all Southfield residents, which allows for an interest only payment of 3% for the first three years with the remaining balance to
be financed at 3% amortized over 15 years for a total of 18 years. The average septic to sewer loan in Southfield is $9,448.57 with an annual
payment of $791.47 (again dependent upon other factors). The second is a zero-interest loan for income eligible residents through the
Southfield Home Improvement Program Well and Septic Program (SHIP-WAS Program). The SHIP-WAS Program will cover the cost of tap fees,
installation of sanitary and water lines, elimination of septic tanks and minimal/limited restoration of areas disturbed by construction.

-236-

�Chapter 8: Puh1ic .Infrastructure
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

Key Trends &amp; Challenges
Electric Vehicles
As electric passenger vehicles (or EVs) become more popular, Southfield is readying itself for the changes in infrastructure that will come along
with the national shift. Michigan currently offers 480 publicly accessible charging stations featuring nearly 1,400 charging outlets, in addition to
146 private charging stations throughout the state. Michigan continues to build out this infrastructure to encourage further EV adoption, putting
the state within the top 25% of states for electric vehicle registrations. Recently, Southfield installed two EV stations right at the Civic Building
(pictured right) and is continuing planning for more EV spaces in the future.
Although electric vehicles are an environmentally-conscious alternative to a standard vehicle, the City of Southfield is cognizant of the various
challenges regarding the use of electric vehicles. The Fire Department is concerned about safety hazards related to fires caused by the highvoltage, lithium-ion batteries. Electric vehicle fires are rare but pose a threat when they do occur. The cost of owning an electric vehicle is
discouraging, especially in low-income households. The lack of charging stations may also hinder residents from purchasing an electric vehicle.
As the City continues to support the use of electric vehicles, the City will continue to explore other sustainable transportation options.
Resources, data, funding opportunities, case studies, and best practices for electric vehicles and infrastructure planning can be found on the
Southeast Michigan Council of Government's website.
Table 8. EV Charging Stations

Existing
Lawrence Technological University
Southfield Municipal Campus*
Eaton Corporation (2)
1-800-LAW-FIRM/Karmanos
Tamaroff Nissan
Avis Ford
Onyx Office Building

21000 W Ten Mile Rd
26000 Evergreen Road
26201 Northwestern Hwy
26700 Lahser Rd
28585 Telegraph Rd
29200 Telegraph Rd
29777 Telegraph Rd
Proposed

Denso (3)
Mapletree Apartments
Proposed Gas Station

* Public
-237-

24777 Denso Dr
28509 Franklin Rd
28681 Northwestern Hwy

�,-

- ---

-

..... ....-· ......

...- ...Chapter 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

Autonomous Vehicles and Car Sharing
Automated and connected vehicles (ACV) and autonomous vehicles have captured the interest of the public, industry, and transportation
authorities. ACVs can significantly reduce accidents, fuel consumption, pollution, and the costs of congestion which in turn will offer a
fundamental change to the future U.S. transportation network. 69
Further, connected vehicles will drive the transformation of global wireless data networks, make it unnecessary for many to own a car at all, and
radically alter transportation. Electric vehicles or EV's are the future, and each year automakers add more EVs to their lineup. Everyone is
working on electric vehicles, from well-established existing manufacturers to new names. 70
Who needs a parking spot close to work if your car can drive you there, park itself miles away, only to pick you up later? Indeed, one of Google's
goals is to facilitate car-sharing. That means fewer cars on the road. Fewer cars, period. Who needs to own a car when you can just order a
shared one and it'll drive up minutes later, ready to take you wherever you want?
"This [has the potential to] dramatically reduce the number of cars on the street, 80% of which have
people driving alone in them, and also a household's cost of transportation, which is 18% of their
income-around $9,000 a year-for an asset that they use only 5% of the time," said Robin Chase, the
founder and CEO of Buzzcar. 71
One impact that will need to be addressed is the residential power grid and supply through electric
charging stations. Drop off and pick-up areas will need to be designated for autonomous vehicles.
Reduced parking stalls and parking areas, which means reduced impervious surfaces, may also be a
benefit from more autonomous vehicles.

Autonomous Delivery
Rapid growth in electronic commerce, or e-commerce, and consumers' demands for faster provisioning
of goods and services requires transportation companies to improve logistical approaches and delivery
technologies. Among other strategies to meet growing reliance on ecommerce and consumer demands,
transportation companies have developed automated delivery devices to provide safe and efficient lastmile delivery, which is the movement of a product from the transportation hub to its final destination,
often in a residential location. Automated delivery devices are autonomous robots that have safety and
navigation features and are designed to travel on sidewalks or along the shoulder of roadways. Some
people believe that retailers and consumers in Michigan would benefit from the safe and uniform
deployment of automated delivery devices. Accordingly, it has been suggested that the Michigan
Legislature enact legislation to govern the use of automated delivery devices.

-238-

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

Nature-Conscious Building
As mentioned above, low-impact development (LID) uses manmade and natural landscape features to handle storm water as close as possible to
where rain and snow fall, and to manage this water as a resource rather than a waste product. Beyond the typical LID methods like rain gardens
and green roofs, additional methods of nature-conscious building have emerged over the last five years, including using bio-conscious
construction mat erials and incorporating habitat into building design . Beyond green roofs they use vegetation to capture stormwater, some
engineers are now considering roof ponds, which can capture water and provide habitat for waterfowl in areas that otherwise lack open water.
Initial research has found that roof ponds are about equally effective in maintaining indoor thermal comfort as other passive heating and cooling
strategies. 72 Additionally, some companies are finding ways to change t he composition of construction materials themselves to reduce carbon
emissions and make it easier to grow plants on the surface of buildings - the London School of Architecture has been experimenting with a bioconcrete that lets moss grow on the surface, step toward incorporating green infrastructure into previously unexplored aspects of
development. 73

COVID-19 Pandemic-Driven Recreation
Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for urban greenspace has grown across the nation as people recreate closer to
home, rather than traveling far distances to major attractions or national parks. In March of 2020, researchers saw a nearly 100% increase in
Google users including "go for a walk" in their search terms online. 74 Increasingly, green infrastructure is being recognized as a way to add
greenspace into the small pockets of cities that are currently lacking. For example, adding a rain garden along a busy street makes getting out
and walking during more enjoyable and gives people a mental respite from the pandemic, while also capturing roadway runoff. As a largely builtup city, Southfield is in a unique position to benefit from these green infrastructure additions in areas where large greenspaces cannot be
constructed.

Smart Infrastructure Monitoring
Leveraging recent advances in technologies, "smart" water systems are poised to transform water resources management by enabling real-time
sensing and control. To reduce flooding and improve water quality, University of Michigan Professor Branko Kerkez and his team are using
autonomous sensors and valves to create "smart" stormwater systems. In collaboration with social scientists, engineers, and local officials and
residents, the research team is working to discover adaptive, real-time ways to reduce flooding forecasting, and improve water quality. Sensors
measure the quality of the water, as well as how much of it is flowing through the system at any given time, and other variables. These sensors
have been deployed in both Detroit, through the GLWA, and Ann Arbor, and may be the future of water management in midwestern cities. 75

Trees as a Utility
Communities around the US are increasingly starting to think of trees as a key part of the stormwater infrastructure system . Trees act as a "living
utility" by intercepting stormwater and absorbing it before it becomes a burden on municipal pipes and waterways. For example, the City of Ann
-239-

�,__

r-

·--

,_., 1...- ,....,- l. ..,-

~

7

1111111•" l
"

ChaJ&gt;ter 8: Public Infrastructure
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

Arbor maintains an extensive street tree network that captures 65 million gallons of stormwater each year, amounting to approximately
$4.million in infrastructure savings for the City. As cities trend toward more invocative definitions for "utilities," it may be time for Southfield to
consider the inclusion of natural features, beyond green infrastructure, as a formal infrastructure asset. 76

Materials Management

,

The City of Southfield has maintained an ongoing partnership with the
Resource Recovery and Recycling Authority of Southwest Oakland County
(RRRASOC) for the City's recycling needs. The City encourages all residents to
participate in recycling efforts and offers information on the City's website
regarding how to obtain recycling carts and bins. RRRASOC's data indicates that
the City of Southfield is a high performer with recycling participation. However,
the City falls short from the national average and is underperforming when
compared to neighboring cities. There is much room for improvement with
recycling participation and the City acknowledges the following challenges:

CITY OF SOUTHFIELD

2021 Souo WASTE AND RECYCLING DASHBOARD METRICS

Materials
Household Hazardous Waste (tons
Yard Waste (tons
Total Tons Utilized

u
•
•
•

Lack of public education on the proper way to recycle various
household materials
Lack of understanding of the positive impact each individual makes on
the community and the environment by choosing to recycle
Inability for apartment complexes, condominiums, and other multifamily housing units to participate in a recycling program

With the City's upcoming Sustainability Action Plan, one of the goals is to
reconcile some of the disconnect with recycling participation through better
public education efforts and reevaluating public policy to accommodate
recycling programs for various commercial and residential properties normally
overlooked or excluded. The Sustainability Action Plan will also thoroughly
analyze recycling data provided by RRRASOC and evaluate annual metrics such
as participation levels, amount of materials recycled, and equivalent carbon
reduction attributed to recycling.

-240-

La

Reduced Airborne Pollution Emi
Reduced Waterborne Pollution Emis
tons

8,023.31
29.3%
19,402.18
27,425.49

2.954
11
160
19,723

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Key Trends &amp; Challenges

The recycling benefits the City would like to emphasize include the following:
•
•
•
•
•

Recycling creates 10 jobs for every ton of material recycled, while only one job is created if that same tonnage is landfilled.
About 100,000 trees are saved annually by RRRASOC's recycling efforts.
Recycling in our communities reduces the emission of airborne pollutants by nearly 300 tons every year, not including GHG.
Recycli ng by RRRASOC's residents annually reduces greenhouse gas emission (GHG) by approximately 6,000 metric tons of carbon
equivalent (MTCE) - equal to nearly 4 percent of their total GHG emissions.
Each year, approximately 100 billion Btu's are conserved through RRRASOC's recycling efforts, equal to the amount of energy consumed
by more than 1,000 homes in one year

SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
PREFERRED

REDUCE
'rrlols again and again

nnde-d

REPURPOSE
u

RECYCLE
RECOVE 'R
,,..o ~+J T H01t1r~ o,..

~"'(, ---•~"'o.: "';.
.._c,'V

~

,R

!~
~

i

~

~

last

~

I

c.GLi:.

"llllll■■M•,..·.._...,"f,::-o'&gt;

&lt;l:?o;s,~4"

R·R·R·A·S·O·C

LEAST PR

0

GLE 1 800

-241-

�·-

--

----Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Key Finding8

Key Findings
What is Sustainability?
According to the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development,
Sustainability means "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their own needs." The three interrelated pillars
of sustainable developments include the environment, social equity, and economic
development.

Strengths and Opportunities
Sustainability Planner
In January of 2022, the Southfield Planning Department began hiring for a new
position: Sustainability Planner. Although the Department has already been
administering sustainability programs and ordinances over the last decade, creating
a formal position presents a key advantage for implementing sustainability-focused
goals for the City's future. Over the next five years, the Sustainability Planner will
concentrate on launching public education campaigns, creating and monitoring
sustainability metrics, identifying resiliency strategies, pursuing grant funding
opportunities, and enhancing existing green infrastructure, woodland, and other
sustainability-related plans. As other Michigan communities have begun to adopt
their Sustainability and Climate Action Plan, the Sustainability Planner will lead the
efforts of creating the City of Southfield's Sustainability and Climate Action Plan for
the City to formally adopt. The Planner will help the City become more involved in
organizations such as the Great Lakes Adaption Network, Institute for Sustainable
Infrastructure, and the United States Green Building Council.

International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives {ICLEI)
A second sustainability-related opportunity for the city is the possibility of joining the
International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, which is an international
non-governmental organization that promotes sustainable development. ICLEI
-242-

'

...... \ SustainabJli

�Chapter 8: PuhJic Jnfrastructurc
Key Findings

provides technical consulting to local governments to meet sustainability objectives, and over 2,500
municipalities in the U.S. are already members. City Administration and the City Planner will formally
recommend joining ICLEI to help guide the City towards the goal of being a more sustainable
community.
ICLEI provides numerous resources that will guide the City in developing a comprehensive
Sustainability and Climate Action Plan. One of those resources is the Sustainability Planning Toolkit.
This toolkit is a written guide intended to assist local municipalities in organizing their planning
efforts and acknowledging that each community is unique and may deviate from some of the
toolkit's processes.

Ongoing System Separations and Planning Ahead
Southfield's ongoing efforts to separate combined sanitary sewer and stormwater systems is putting
the City in a better position to handle increased flooding in the future. The City also continues to plan
ahead for these events through the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP}, which plans to make the
following infrastructure improvements:
•
•
•
•
•

Storm Water Treatment -Adopt treatment regulations for cleaner surface water
Basins - Rebuild and maintain existing storm water basins
Sewers -Rebuild and maintain existing sewers
Stream Bank Erosion - Repair stream bank infrastructure
Storm Water Detention - Repair and restore open stream channels

Co-Locating Traffic Calming with Green Infrastructure
As mentioned above under the COVID-19 Pandemic-Driven Recreation section,
Southfield's status as a built-out city makes it uniquely well-suited to leverage
green infrastructure to increase green space and stormwater capture . To add
another function, the City could co-locate green infrastructure improvement with
traffic calming efforts, incorporating vegetation as a way to slow traffic and
improve roadway safety. For example, rain gardens can be planted in pedestrian
crossing "bump-outs" to increase drivers' sense of closeness to the curb and
encourage slower speeds. For further opportunities regarding the City's pilot
traffic calming program, please refer to the Key Findings of Chapter 4.

-243-

�r--

~

~

,..... ....... ...Chapter 8: Puhlic Infrastructure
Key Findings

Redevelopment Ready
One of the City's strengths is the numerous services that it offers to incentivize and lower the cost of green development. These services include
the standardized tree planting and stormwater engineering schematics that are free for any developer to use. In addition to these, the City
offers Green Fast Track Review to any development project that has environmentally sustainable or "green" components, which prioritizes site
plans that meet sustainability objectives.

Climate Migration Destination
As the world's climate changes, experts are looking around for places that are likely to receive in-migration of population. A growing number are
pointing to the Great Lakes region, especially Michigan, and its historic cities and towns. From a climate migration perspective, the region has
many advantages: it is not subject to sea level rise or hurricanes, prone to wildfires, and rarely experiences water shortages. Additionally, the
region's most frequent extreme weather events, blizzards, are likely to be mitigated by a warming climate. 77

• Lead Plan Development
• Ensure Departmental Participation
• Make Major Announcements

• Brainstor
• Develop
• Input on
Plan
• Planning

• Lead Plan Development
• Ensure Departmental Participation
• Make Major Announcements

• Define High Priority Issues
• Analyze Issues &amp; Strategies as
Required
• Public Meeting Participation

-244-

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Key Findings

Weaknesses and Threats
Climate Change: Climate Migrators and Floods
Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. These shifts may be natural, such as through variations in the
solar cycle. But since the 1800s, human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to burning fossil fuels like coal, oil
and gas. Burning fossil fuels generates greenhouse gas emissions that act like a blanket wrapped around the Earth, trapping the sun's heat and
raising temperatures. Examples of greenhouse gas emissions that are causing climate change include carbon dioxide and methane. Energy,
industry, transport, buildings, agriculture, and
2- SLIGHT
construction are among the main emitters.
(SLGT)
As more people move to Michigan over the next
Scattered
No severe*
century, many cities will experience a strain on their
severe storms
thunderstorms
existing infrastructure as more people use their water,
possible
expected
stormwater, and sanitary sewer systems. Southfield
Lightning/flooding
Short-hved andtor
More persistent
may face a particular challenge under this scenario,
I threats exist with all
and/or widespread,
due to its aging infrastructure and high impervious
thunderstonns
a few intense
surface area, which makes it more susceptible to
flooding.
The City has experienced more frequent Category 2
storms in the last few years which have been attributed
to power outages, property damage, and flooding.

-245-

�,,_,

--

~

--

llllllr"

_.....
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Key Findings

In October 2022, the Sustainability Team at the City of Southfield released a survey to all City Staff to understand individual baseline
perspectives regarding sustainability. Survey participants were allocated two weeks to complete the survey and the results were anonymous.
The survey consisted of 15 questions organized in various formats from ranking topics of importance to filling in blanks with phrases and
recommendations that correspond to certain questions. There were a total of 75 participants from numerous departments throughout the City.
Overall, most responses confirm the importance of sustainability and reflect support for the development of a Sustainability and Climate Action
Plan. Over 97% of respondents Agreed (61.33%) or Strongly Agreed (36%) that "Sustainability is an important aspect of the future of our City."
Figure 25. Response Summary from City Staff Sustainability Survey - Question 1
QUESTION - How do you feel about the following statements?

I have a good understandlns of what sustainablllty is and
what It means to me.

1U7'K

Sustainability Is an Important aspect of the future of our
City.

6.00%

Sustainability Is an Important aspect of the future of our
Region.

34.67'(.

Sustalnablllty ts an Important aspect of the future of our
State.

34.67%

Sustainability Is an Important aspect of the future of our
Country.

32.00%

56.~

24 .00%

The City of Southfi~d should develop a Sustainability Plan
to help guide our current and future actions regarding
sustainability.
The City of Southfiel d should develop a Climate Action
Plan to address factors that effect our climate.

11.~

31.6~

The City of Southfield should set or help establish
Greenhouse Gas (GHG} Emission Reductions Goals for City•
owned assets and operations.
The City of Southfiel d should set or help establish
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) EmlsslOl'I Reductions Goals
Citywide.
Renewabl e energy sources such as solar, seothermal,
wind, biomass, and hydropower should be prlorltlted to
meet current and future energy demand.

21.IK

17.811'

33.33"

35.62"

■ Strongl

-246-

�Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Key Findings

Figure 26. Response Summary from City Staff Sustainability Survey - Question 2
QUESTION - The following are some topics that are commonly referenced in the discussion of sustainability.
How important is it that the City of Southfield prioritize these topics?
Water &amp; Sewer - Safe and reliable access to clean
water and disposal of waste.
Transportatjon - Maintenance of roads, bridges,
public transit, and walkable Infrastructure.
Solid Waste &amp; Recycling - Accesslbl._. and easily
understood solid waste disposal options.
Municipal Facilities - Modernized, energy efficient
buildings and facilities.
Community Cohesion - Diverse, equitable, and
rnclusive access to community resources and civic
engagement.

,....

lo.It"

24.32%

32.43"

10.27"

ll.08"

16-221'

25.68%

33.78"

U.Sl"

Public Health &amp; Safety - Accessible programs and
information.
Economic &amp; Financial Vitality - Responsible and
transparent financial practices.

U.Sl"

Energy - Dependable and resilient infrastructure.

12~

Education - Competitive, equitable access to quality
education and Information.

U.'IOK

Culture - Civic engagement through art, history, and
social sciences.
Environment - Maintenance of ecosystems, habitats,
air quality, and natural resources.

21.38%

30.14"

20~55"

1U&amp;1'

11.11"

26.39"

23.61"

■ 1 (Not Important)

-247-

■2

■ 3

4

■

S ,(Very Important)

■

No Answer

�,_ l--

·-

I_, ,_...

I---

11111111""""

ll
Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure
Goals, Objectives, and Sll·ategies

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies
Goals
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Ensure sustainability improvements are distributed equitably across the city
Ensure that all elements of the built environment, including land use, transportation, housing, energy, and infrastructure, work
together to provide sustainable, green places for living, working, and recreation, with a high quality of life
Ensure that contributions of natural resources to human well-being are explicitly recognized and valued and that maintaining
their health is a primary objective
Promote active living by making it safer to walk or bike to daily activities like shopping, work, school, and recreation
Support and adopt Smart Growth policies to ensure the community is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable
Educate the community about sustainability initiatives and opportunities to lower their impact on the planet
Foster partnerships with sustainability experts to create a network of knowledge
Facilitate access to information and communication technology
Develop policies that focus on higher quality of life through clean air and water, beautiful parks and green spaces, and clean and
efficient energy use
Promote the public welfare and serve the public interest, convenience, and enjoyment through the promotion of the arts in the
City of Southfield

Objectives and Strategies
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Hire a Sustainability Planner
Establish a Sustainability and Climate Action Plan Task Force
Create and adopt a Sustainability and Climate Action Plan document
Adopt a Climate Action Resolution by City Council
Adopt a formal Complete Streets Policy, beyond that included in the Master Plan, and a Vision Zero Action Plan
Join the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI)
Engage City Staff and Elected Officials in sustainability education efforts and surveys to establish baseline sustainability
knowledge
Recruit external partners to form a Sustainability Advisory Board
Author educational material for City events that promote sustainable practices
Ensure infrastructure projects do not adversely impact disadvantaged communities or the natural environment

-248-

�I

m
~

N

I

�Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services
Art Title: LTU Barrier Mural 2
by Sheila Nico/in

�r 9: Public Facilities and Scn·iccs
·111Lroduct.io11

Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services
Introduction
The City of Southfield offers a range of public facilities to its residents and businesses. The quality, availability,
and cost of these elements are among the factors influencing growth and redevelopment in the city.
Residential, commercial, and especially industrial users, make location decisions based, in part, upon the ability
of a municipality to meet their present and future needs in the most cost-effective way possible. As
competition for new development between communities grows and as technology advances, residents and
business owners will expect more from local governments. To keep pace with these demands, Southfield must
continually upgrade and diversify its facilities and services.
Public facilities and services include educational and religious institutions, library facilities, public safety, parks (discussed in Chapter 3: Healthy
Living), sewer, and water (discussed in Chapter 8: Public Infrastructure), all of which are provided to serve the needs of residents and businesses
in Southfield. These are all organized and operated daily by City departments. Residents also influence these services through participation in
commissions, boards, and election to City Council.

City Government
The basic form of local government in Southfield is Council-Administrator. The Administrator is responsible for overseeing the everyday
mechanics of City government and reports directly to the seven-member City Council. City Council is the local legislative body which determines
City policy, makes decisions on zoning, ordinances, and legislative matters. The Mayor, the ceremonial head of City government, makes
recommendations to Council and is the City's representative to all other legislative bodies.
The City of Southfield is a progressive community that is a welcoming, livable, sustainable, vibrant, walkable, and inck.:~:·v'e city that strived to
provide equal opportunities to all individuals. The City of Southfield is fortunate to be served by many long-tenured elected officials,
administrators, department heads, directors, and staff. Both the Mayor and City Administrator maintain open door policies to their respective
offices to maintain clear and open lines of communication. The City of Southfield also launched a new program in 2016, the Southfield
Ambassadors, as a collective of talented residents that strive to stimulate progress within Southfield's civic, community, business, and economic
development landscapes. Ambassadors work to connect with fellow residents and surrounding cities to promote Southfield and raise awareness
of its many events and activities. This select group of volunteers engage in an active two-year leadership development program while
networking with Southfield officials, organizations, and businesses to raise public awareness of key programs and projects for the city.
-251-

�-

-

---

---

......,..

IIIIIIIF"'

..,...

lllllllr""
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services
Introduction

Ambassadors are diverse in their work and life experiences as well as their demographic backgrounds. The intent of the Ambassadors program is
that they will stay involved in the city well after their two-year fellowship to continue their efforts to benefit the community.

City Boards and Commissions
Southfield has an active resident population that participates in many different boards and commissions, totaling 34. Residents may become
members of these groups either through appointment or by election. At the time the plan was prepared, these bodies included, but are not
limited to:

Existing City Boards &amp; Commissions
Arts Commission
Board of Review
Brownfield Redevelopment Authority
Building Authority Commission
Building Code Board
Citizens Police Advisory Board
City Centre Advisory Board
City Council
Civil Service Commission
Commission on Senior Adults
Downtown Development Authority (DOA)
DOA Citizens Area Council
Economic Development Corporation
Electrical Code Board
Fire and Police Retirement System Board
Historic Designation Advisory Board
Historic District Commission

Housing Commission
Library Board
Library Building Authority
Local Development Finance Authority
Local Officers Compensation Commission
Mechanical Code Board of Appeals
Parks and Recreation Commission
Planning Commission
Plumbing Code Board of Appeals
Retiree Health Care Benefits Plan and Trust Board
Tax Increment Finance Authority
SERS Board
Total Living Commission
Veterans Commission
Wildlife Commission
Zoning Board of Appeals

----------~---~~--~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~--~~--

City Departments
The City of Southfield Donald J. Fracassi Municipal Campus, including City Hall, is located at 26000 Evergreen Road in the Southfield City Centre
district. The Campus houses offices for most City Departments, including Parks and Recreation, Senior Center, Public Safety (Police), the 46th
District Court, Public Services, City Administration, Clerks and Treasurer, and boards and commissions. At the time this plan was prepared, the
City had 31 departments under the Mayor, City Council, and the City Administrator. Many of these departments had a direct or support role in
implementation of this plan.

-252-

�Chapter q: Public Faci.lities and Services
Introduction

Other Agencies and Institutions
Southfield includes a host of outside agencies
that require on-going coordination and
communication. Institutional resources such as
libraries, schools and places of worship enrich
the lives of residents and are important in
attracting new businesses and residents to the
region . Institutional resources should be
showcased consistently as this plan is
implemented. Most importantly, the City of
Southfield should work to highlight these
facilities in promotional materials to help
market the City.

Southfield Public Library
The Southfield Public Library is located within
the Municipal Center complex on Evergreen
Road. The library has been a dependable
community resource and center for information
since 1960. The library has grown steadily ever
since and now offers an unsurpassed collection
of over 250,000 print and media resources, all
easily accessed in a world class building
constructed in 2003.
All residents of Southfield and Lathrup Village
are eligible for a Southfield Library card which
includes access to the library's electronic
offerings such as e-books, downloadable
audiobooks, and research databases. The
library is part of TLN (The Library Network), a
consortium of 65 communities which have
formed reciprocal borrowing agreements to
allow residents access to each other's libraries.
-253-

�..--.

--

---

...

...,..

llllllllf'"

lllllf"'"
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Set"\'ices
Introduction

The Southfield Public Library offers a full array of modern library services, including books, magazines, newspapers, DVDs, CDs, public
computers, WI-Fl, audiobooks, and wonderful programming. Below is a sampling of the types of amenities available at the Southfield Public
Library:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Vibrant Children's Library
lmaginarium Children's Garden
Group Study Rooms
Drive-Up Services
Friends Book Sales
Auditorium and Large Meeting Room
Foreign Language Collections
Literacy Collection
Quiet Study Areas
Small Business Start-Up Center

Oakland County and Oakland County Michigan Works! Southfield
The Oakland County Michigan Works! Southfield Service Center is a Division of the City's Business and Economic Development Department.
Funded by Oakland Workforce Development Board, the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity administers the following
programs for job seekers and employers:
•
•
•
•

Employment Services
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)*
Partnership, Accountability, Training, Hope (PATH)*

Oakland County Michigan Works! Southfield is one of six Service Centers in Oakland County. 78 As a One-Stop Center, they have designed their
programs to fit local needs, working together with the Business Development Department, Southfield Area Chamber of Commerce, and schools
to fulfill the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity Mission Statement "to develop a system that produces a workforce with
the required skills to maintain and enhance the Michigan Economy."
Its major premise is that all major workforce development and economic development services should be available through a single point of
entry. Oakland County Michigan Works! Southfield's focus is to help ensure that Michigan employers hire better educated and better trained
employees.

-254-

�Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Sc1"\·iccs
Introduct.ion

MOOT and Oakland County
Two key agencies are the Michigan Department of Transportation (MOOT) and Oakland County. The County interacts with the City in many
facets including the drain and road commissions, parks and recreation, economic development, and the court system.

Colleges and Universities
Lawrence Tech University
Lawrence Technological University (LTU), www.ltu.edu, is a premier private university providing superior education through innovative
programs, cutting-edge technology, small class sizes, and a commitment to its motto, "theory and practice." LTU offers more than 100
undergraduate, master's, doctoral and professional certificate programs in Colleges of Architecture and Design, Arts and Sciences, Business and
Information Technology, and Engineering.
PayScale lists LTU among the nation's top 11% of universities for alumni salaries, which is the highest in the Detroit metropolitan area. Forbes
Magazine lists LTU as one of America's Top Colleges and the Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education places LTU in the top 10% of American
colleges and universities. It is also listed in the top tier of Midwestern universities by U.S. News and World Report and the Princeton Review.
LTU enrolls 3,000 students during an academic year. Its four residential halls have a
combined capacity of over 1,000 students. The University was founded in 1932 with the
support and encouragement of Henry Ford . Established to meet the educational needs of
business and commerce, LTU has continuously maintained close ties to industry in a
multitude of projects in a wide variety of fields. A Lawrence Tech education strives to explain
not only why something works, but how it works in real situations and applications.
Many LTU academic programs require participation in professional projects that seek to
solve real-world problems facing practicing architects, engineers, managers, scientists, and
others. Students also gain hands-on experience through co-op jobs and internships.
Professional organizations provide additional opportunities to network with industry leaders.
Many students participate in applied research projects as early as their freshman year.
Lawrence Tech students regularly earn top awards in international competition with other
leading colleges and universities. LTU graduates report, in numbers well above national
norms that they arrive in the workplace feeling prepared and ready to do their jobs. Even in
challenging economic times, 84% find career positions or are registered for grad school at
time of commencement - greater than the national average.

-255-

LTU MISSION

"Lawrence Technological University's major
focus at this time is the creation of
additional space to accommodate emerging
fields in engineering, the life and other
sciences, and architecture. Looking ahead, it
is likely that the University will continue to
consider additionai on-campus student
housing and the building out of amenities
that address needs for student recreation
and athletics, conference and meeting
spaces, campus beautification, applied
research, and a host of other scholastic and
academic needs."

�.,_..

_.

... ---

~

......
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services
Introduction

LTU's student body is diverse with more than SO countries represented on campus. The University's Study Abroad program is open to all
students, and various cultural events and celebrations focused on diversity are held annually on campus. LTU also maintains relationships and
partnerships with universities worldwide.
LTU was Michigan's first wireless laptop computer campus and has been ranked among America's top SO "unwired" universities. All
undergraduates receive their own University-issued personal computer loaded with their field's industry-standard programs -valued up to
$75,000. No other university in the nation offers 24/7 access to computing power like the LTUZone.
The A. Alfred Taubman Student Services Center consolidates all student support services - from admissions through career services - into a
convenient one-stop center. This innovative 42,000-square-foot building, which utilizes many energy-efficient and environmentally friendly
features and technologies, serves as a "living laboratory" and is part of a region-wide stormwater management effort. The Nabil Grace Center
for Innovative Materials Research, located on LTU's campus, is a state-of-the-art laboratory for the research, development, and testing of
materials for defense and infrastructure applications.
LTU offers an undergraduate honors program for highly motivated and qualified students. The Quest Program in the College of Arts and Sciences
encourages students to go above and beyond their studies and explore their interests on a deeper level. The Academic Achievement Center
helps ease the transition from high school to college by providing support services.
In addition to exceptional educational opportunities, LTU offers an exciting student life. A growing number of men's and women's varsity athletic
programs are offered. Lawrence Tech is a member of the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics and the American College Hockey
Association. More than 60 student clubs and organizations, including student government, fraternities, sororities, honor societies, and student
chapters of professional groups, sponsor a variety of activities during the year.

-256-

�Chapter 9: Public l•acililics and Sc1Ticc.
Introduction

Oakland Community College (OCC)

The OCC Southfield Campus is located at 22322 Rutland Drive (west of Providence Hospital, south of Nine Mile Road), within the Southfield
Downtown Development District. The OCC Southfield Campus offers college readiness, degree, and transfer programs, and serves as a major
resource for the primary and continuing education of health professionals. State-of-the-art laboratories support an array of health professions
programs, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Diagnostic Medical Sonography
Nuclear Medicine Technology
Nursing
Radiologic Technology
Respiratory Therapy Technology
Surgical Technology

Approximately 4,000 students attend the Southfield Campus each fall. Nearly half of Southfield students are pursuing an OCC degree or
certificate, followed by approximately 42% of students seeking to transfer to a four-year institution. Programs with the largest enrollment at the
Southfield Campus are nursing and business administration.
The campus, one of five in the OCC system, offers easy entry to the Lodge and Southfield Expressways, and is on public transportation routes to
provide students convenient access. Its urban setting is central to Berkley, Beverly Hills, Oak Park, Southfield, and the border of Wayne County.
Strategic priorities are performance areas where investments of resources will add the most value to advancing student success and
achievement of OCC's vision.
•
•
•
•

College Readiness (Developmental Education)
Employment Readiness (Career and Technical Programs)
Transfer Readiness
Financial Accountability

-257-

�r --

---

--~-

-· - ....

...,.,
Chapter(): Public Facilities and Sct'\'ices
Fire Department

Fire Department
Current Conditions
The Southfield Fire Department was the first in Michigan to offer
advanced life support (paramedic services) when it initiated the
service in 1972. Since then, it has continued to be a leader in
emergency medical service, with the most modern training and
equipment available. Southfield offers a full-service Fire
Department which has the dual ability to fight fires and provide
paramedic service. It also supplies technically trained special rescue
teams such as hazardous materials, high-rise, confined space, and
trench rescue. The Department is among the busiest in the county
and still manages to maintain an average response time of less
than 4 minutes to any address.
A fire station supports the needs of the fire department and the
community in which it is located. It must accommodate extremely
diverse functions, including housing, recreation, administration,
training, community education, equipment and vehicle storage,
equipment and vehicle maintenance, and hazardous materials
storage. While it is usually only occupied by trained personnel, the
facility may also need to accommodate the public for community education or outreach .
Fire stations will vary somewhat in design depending on specific mission (e.g., the types of
emergencies that will be responded to or the types of fires that will be fought). Usually, the
facility differences relate to the size of the firefighting apparatus and facility location.

SOUTHFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
MISSION
"To provide the citizens and visitors of

Southfield with the highest quality fire

In 2022 there were five fire stations - two located on Nine Mile, two on Twelve Mile, and one on
Lahser Road.

and fire protection available. We

Recent Programs and Initiatives

accomplish this mission by intense

prevention, emergency medical care,

training, thorough preparation, prompt

Emergency Medical Services {EMS) Patient Transporting Program

professional response, and a positive,
caring attitude toward those we are

The Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Patient Transporting Program continues to provide the
highest quality service to residents. Since EMS began transporting in 2005, the Fire Department
-258-

sworn to protect."

�Chapter 9: Public Fncilit:ics and Services
Fire DeparlJnent

has brought in net revenues of $20,800,000.00 over the last 10 years to assist in supporting services. The Fire Department has received over
$2.5 million dollars in grants for EMS over the last 5 years.

Assistance to Firefighter Grant (AFG)
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the AFG has been re-invigorated by federal pandemic response funds. The Fire Department has
successfully applied for and won AFG funds in the past and will continue to pursue them in the future. In 2013 the fire department applied for
and was granted $39,000 through the AFG to purchase and implement:
•
•
•
•

60 new fire helmets and physical fitness equipment
6 new commercial treadmills
5 new stair climbers
Firefighter Physical Fitness Program

Michigan Mutual Aid Box Alarm System (MABAS), Oakway Technical Rescue, Hazmat and Training
The Fire Departmenf s involvement in the Michigan Mutual Aid Box Alarm System (MABAS), Oakway Technical Rescue, Hazmat and Training has
worked toward meeting the City1s objective of greater "regionalization. 11
Membership and Divisional Leadership in the State of MABAS is a user-driven system designed to streamline the requesting and providing of
emergency and fire service resources across the State of Michigan and the Great Lakes Region for events such as major fires, train derailments,
tornadoes, hazardous materials incidents, wild land fires, domestic or foreign terrorism and other events that may overwhelm a local fire
department.
MABAS-MI is one of four states that are piloting the deployment of Mutual Aid Net, a software application that is designed to serve as a resource
database and mutual aid deployment tool.

Key Trends and Challenges
Fire Services Changes
It is perceived by many fire service leaders that fire departments across the United States will see a shift from just emergency service response
to a comprehensive community risk reduction and management focus. This statement is becoming more and more common as the Department
talks with other fire service leaders from across our nation. At the National Fire Academy Executive Fire Officer (EFO) Research Center,
documents are being developed and presented on this very topic. It was a topic of discussion at the International Association of Fire Chiefs
(IAFC) strategic planning meeting.

-259-

�--

-

....

111111W

1111111W'

• .,....

~

,,,,,..

Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services
Fire Department

Medical Technology Innovations
The medical field is continuously changing with innovative equipment and procedures always on the horizon. EMS is often the first step in the
chain of patient care and the Southfield Fire Department's actions are a pivotal point in determining ultimate patient outcome. Hence, the
Department is acutely aware of these changes and readily adapt as required. Southfield Fire Department EMS has always been on the forefront
of adaptation.
Current examples include:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Electronic EMS reporting (improves documentation and billing).
Intra-osseous capability (enables vascular access through bone) .
CO monitoring (measures patient and FF Carbon Monoxide levels).
Res-q-Pod {CPR airway adjunct, increases blood flow to brain).
King Vision Laryngoscope {Increases successful ET intubations).
CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, used to treat severe DIB.

Key Findings and Future Plans
The Fire Department already responds and reactively handles most
emergencies and crisis within the community. The Southfield Fire
Department will be focusing on a proactive approach to allow for a safer
community which works towards improving the quality of life for
residents. If the City can prevent most incidents from occurring, then
costs to individuals and the community will be significantly reduced,
quality of life will be improved, and the potential for economic
sustainability will be increased. As government budgets continue to
shrink, stress on the Department's ability to provide service will continue.
The impact of these cuts is witnessed almost daily in the fire service
across the country, with browning out of fire stations, closing of fire
stations, staff reduction through attrition, and critical staffing reductions
through layoffs.
The Fire Department has reached a new era in its history. As the
Department enter this new era it must adapt its philosophies, strategies,
and tactics. The builders and engineers that design and construct
disposable buildings will need to focus their efforts on fire codes that
require automatic fire suppression systems as well as early detection

-260-

FIRE DEPARTMENT 5-10 YEAR GOALS
1) New Fire Training Tower (insert photo illustration)
2) Achieve and retain a diverse fire service workforce
3) Continue to take advantage of State and Federal Grants to
help reduce some of the financial strain on the
community
4) Increase community education in the areas of risk
reduction, fire safety and emergency medical services
(EMS). Technological advances in EMS have enabled
enhancements in patient care that have improved
outcomes and shorter hospital stays for our patients.
5) 2 Week Summer Fire Camp for High School Kids.
6) Implement a "Citizens Fire Academy" that will focus on
the day-to-day operation of the fire department.

Topics:
•
•
•
■

•
•
•
■
■

•
•
•

Administration of the Fire Department
Tour of Facilities and Dispatch Center
Fire Behavior/Ladder Operations
Fire Engines/ Ambulance Familiarization
Hazardous Materials Program
Vehicle Extrication
Fire Hose and Ventilation
Fire Prevention and Code Enforcement
Fire Safety Education and CPR Training
Portable Fire Extinguishers ABC Fires
Incident Command System
Ride Along

�Chapter 9: Public 'F acilities and Scn;ccs
Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Division

systems in all properties - including residential properties - where these systems must be mandatory. Builders who fail to embrace new
technology set communities up for increased risk, which will force the Department to employ new tactics and develop a new Risk Management
Plan.
To keep pace with societal changes, the Southfield Fire Department must continually review the mission and determine if it will meet the
community's demands into the future. The old mission of simply "saving lives and protecting property" may no longer have the depth or scope
necessary to meet future challenges and the expectations of the public. If the mission must change, fire service leaders must take steps now to
meet the challenge of this change. This will require innovation, courage, and the commitment of fire service leaders at all levels, both career
and volunteer. Embracing change may be the single greatest challenge facing the fire service in the next century.
The Southfield Fire Department has been and will continue to be a regional leader in areas of fire suppression, EMS, high-rise firefighting,
technical rescue, hazmat, public education, and technology.

Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Division
Current Conditions
The Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Division has been in Southfield for many years. Also called "Emergency Management," the
Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Division was designed to meet the current needs of the City with regard to preparedness,
mitigation, response and recovery in the event of a man-made or natural disaster. While many communities rely upon County and State
agencies, Southfield has an independent, State-recognized program to serve its residents directly.

The continued effort to safeguard the lives and property within Southfield requires a commitment of continual planning, training, and exercising
of the response capabilities for any type of threat or disaster that may occur. Paramount to how well the City respond to such an event is how
well it is prepared . Preparedness is a whole community approach, so the Division has implemented a "Do 1 Thing" initiative that encourages
families to take small steps each month toward becoming better prepared for emergencies and disasters. Every step individuals make to
becoming prepared will help first responders, their loved ones, and others in the community. The goal of the Homeland Security and Emergency
Preparedness Division is to continue to partner with residents, the business community, and County, State and Federal Agencies to ensure
Southfield remains a disaster resilient community.

-261-

�....

......

--

--

IIIIIJ""
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Scr\iccs
Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Di\'ision

Recent Programs and Initiatives
Closed Point of Dispensing (POD)
Whether caused by an accident, disease outbreak, or terrorist attack, an emergency could occur requiring the public to receive immediate, lifesaving medication. The CDC's Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) cooperative agreement provides funding to state and local public
health departments to support their effective response to a range of public health threats. One of the requirements of the cooperative
agreement is for states and localities to develop plans for receiving, distributing, and dispensing medication from the Strategic National
Stockpile, a national repository of critical medication and supplies that are available to supplement state and local resources during a public
health emergency. The goal in a large-scale emergency is to get medication to the entire population in a short, clinically relevant timeframe (e.g.,
the release of anthrax into a community would require the public to receive medication within 48 hours).
The City of Southfield has partnered with the Oakland County Health Department to establish a Closed Point of Dispensing (POD). Operating a
Closed POD in a public health emergency will help assure timely distribution of medications to employees and their family members. The
establishment of this POD complements the emergency preparedness plans, improves employee health and safety, helps the City maintain a
continuity of operations and aids in becoming more resilient during and after an emergency.
Community Emergency Response Team (CERT)
The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program educates people about disaster
preparedness for hazards that may impact their area and trains them in basic disaster
response skills, such as fire safety, light search and rescue, team organization, and disaster
medical operations. Using the training learned in the classroom and during exercises, CERT
members can assist others in their neighborhood or workplace following an event when
professional responders are not immediately available to help. CERT members also are
encouraged to support emergency response agencies by taking a more active role in
emergency preparedness projects in their community.
The City of Southfield currently has 31 active CERT members. Annually, they volunteer approximately 1,200 hours to assist at special City events
and to assist with training and exercising. In the event of an emergency, Southfield CERT is readily available to assist in multiple functions.
Southfield's Emergency Management Division offers free certification classes for adults 18 and over consisting of 2 hours of classroom
instruction and 8 hours of practical training consisting of group exercises.

-262-

�...
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and ScrYiccs
Police l&gt;cpartn1enl

Police Department
Current Conditions
The City of Southfield Police Department (SPD) is an essential part of the Public Safety Group. The
department, based out of the Donald F. Fracassi Municipal Campus, provides a variety of quality
services. The Patrol Division is staffed by over 80 uniformed officers assigned to road patrol. The
Investigations Division includes a Crime Lab, Detectives and Evidence Technicians. Specialized
assignments consist of School Resource Officers, Community Relations Unit, Traffic Safety Bureau,
Canine Unit, Animal Control Unit, Tactical Crime Suppression Unit, and the Special Entry and
Response Team (SERT). The 9-1-1 Emergency Communications Center is also part of the Police
Department.
The SPD is continually striving to maintain the highest level of commitment, dedication, and
service to the residents of Southfield and its visitors. Southfield Police Department officers aim to
ensure the Department remains exceptional and deserving of the trust and confidence of the
community through community-oriented policing, continual comprehensive training, and selection
and retention of quality personnel who will best represent the police profession.
The SPD has adopted the Community Harms Directed Policing Model. Many police agencies
measure success through reductions in violent crime and property crime. Under the Community
Harms Directed Policing Model, violent and property crimes will remain a top priority of the SPD.
However, community input regarding harms affecting quality of life concerns is compiled and
addressed with a sense of urgency.

POLICE DEPARTMENT
ACHIEVEMENTS 2017-2020

•

•

•
•

•
•

Fully deployed Body Worn
Cameras
Use of Force policy is in
alignment with National Best
Practices in Policing
Developed a Domestic Violence
Prevention Strategy
Instituted an Awards Ceremony
for the Police Department
Began annual recognition of
Breast Cancer Awareness and
Domestic Violence Awareness
Established a Traffic Safety
Bureau

This approach ensures that the Department is being creative at implementing strategies to address community concerns related to behavioral
health, environmental issues, substance abuse, traffic accidents and, youth safety. This model provides the SPD with a framework to strategically
allocate resources appropriately. The model is fluid, allowing it to address changes in community harms over time.

Crime
In 2018, the Southfield violent crime rate per capita decreased to 278 per 100,000 residents. In 2019, it decreased again to 272 .7 per 100,000
residents. The most recent data shows a slight increase in violent crime between 2019-2021. Property crimes decreased in 2020 and rose to an
average rate again in 2021, as shown in Table 9.

-263-

�•

...

..,.,

Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services
Police Department

The employees of the Southfield Police Department have leveraged technology, strengthened partnerships and as a result, a significant number
of perpetrators were arrested for assaults and property crimes. SPD is committed to serving the residents of Southfield. The implementation of
innovative programs will continue to be instrumental in the overall reduction of crime.
Table 9. Crime Statistics, 2018-2021

Type of Crime

2018

2019

2020

2021

Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter

2

3

4

Sexual Assault

31

1
28

34

52

Robbery

46

35

37

60

Aggravated Assault

90

94

181

220

Property Crimes

1,372

1,366

1,145

1,372

Burglary

262

915
195

321
791

182

Larceny-theft

614

214
793

254

342

357

Violent Crime

Non-Violent Crime

Motor-vehicle theft

Recent Programs and Initiatives
Domestic Violence - Coordinated Community Response Team (CCRT)
Prevention, awareness, and enforcement are all key components to reducing the harms caused by domestic violence encounters. The
Department has formed partnerships with Haven, the Southfield Domestic Violence Group, the 46th District Court, and the Southfield Fire
Department to organize community outreach initiatives. The strategy involves a multi-layered approach designed to change behaviors of
offenders and victims. SPD has established a Domestic Violence Coordinated Community Response Team (CCRT). The CCRT is a multi-disciplinary
group comprised of public safety officials, representatives of the court, school officials, elected officials, and non-governmental community
advocate organizations. The CRRT is dedicated to the identification of high-risk domestic violence cases and the creation of a coordinated
community response, including prevention and community education.

-264-

~

�Chapter 9: Public l•'acilitics and Services
Police Department

Traffic Safety
The Traffic Safety Bureau is strategically deployed to address community traffic concerns occurring within the city. The mission of the bureau is
to reduce harmful driving behaviors through education, awareness, and enforcement. Traffic accident data and citizen complaints are used to
identify areas of enforcement.

Overdose Mapping
The police department has partnered with the Michigan High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) program to track, document, and share
fatal and non-fatal drug overdose incidents (Overdose Mapping). When police or fire units respond to a drug overdose scene, the information
received is entered in a national data base by the Communications Section . Detectives can gather pertinent information to be used for
investigative purposes (victims, suspects, type of narcotics etc.). In addition, the system will alert SPD if patterns or spikes of drug overdoses
occur in Southfield or neighboring jurisdictions.

COMEBACK Quick Response Team
The Southfield Police Department has partnered with Families Against Narcotics (F.A.N.) and implemented a COMEBACK Quick Response Team.
The COMEBACK Quick Response Team (QRT) is a collaborative program created and developed to reduce the mortality rates in Michigan
counties due to overdose deaths. This partnership will engage in positive intervention to provide education, support services, and recovery
options, all while working together to reduce the stigma associated with those suffering with substance use disorders.
Currently, there are 20 police departments in Michigan that are participating in this initiative. The process provides a 72-hour follow up with
overdose cases occurring in the city. Southfield Police Officers will respond with certified counselors assigned to the QRT and provide free
resources to those suffering from substance abuse disorders, as well as their families. The program is grant funded; participating Southfield
Police Officers have received the training and the costs were covered through the program.
A monthly review of the Department's policies and procedures are conducted to ensure services provided are in line with national best
practices. Maintaining a cutting-edge approach to addressing the expectations of the community they proudly serve is paramount in building
community partnerships and keeping with the community policing model. Additionally, the creation of the Chief's Citizens Police Advisory Board
allows for an even further collaboration in their customer service approach. This allows residents to voice their concerns related to their
neighborhoods. The open line of communication enhances transparency and trustworthiness. This proactive approach is a change in "how things
used to be done" and allows for solving issues through channels in addition to law enforcement.

School Collaboration/Youth Engagement
Members of the department have fostered partnerships with youth mentoring organizations. Topics of discussion include education, financial
literacy, interaction with authority, social issues, and mental health coaching techniques (suicide prevention, conflict resolution, etc.).

-265-

�...
-

...

.......

....-

- - - ..,,. IIIIF'
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Ser,ices
Police J&gt;cpart111ent

The Southfield Public School District has invited the Southfield Police Department to participate in school-based mentoring programs. The goal
of this collaboration is to develop meaningful relationships between the youth and law enforcement.
SPD increased the number of School Resource Officers (SRO) assigned to the Southfield Public School District. The SROs are responsible for
providing safety and crime prevention in the schools. In addition, the Community Policing Unit contributes to youth engagement by conducting a
variety of relevant initiatives directed at our youth .

Key Trends and Challenges
Recruiting and Retention
Law enforcement agencies across the country are encountering challenges in recruiting and retention. National movements to defund the
police, protests, civil unrest, and distrust of the police has resulted in a record number of police officers choosing to retire early. In addition,
there has been a significant reduction in applicants interested in careers in law enforcement. In response, the Southfield Police Department has
formed a Recruiting Committee. The goal of the Committee is to develop creative ideas to attract qualified applicants to join the Department's
ranks. The Committee, in partnership with the Human Resource Department, is dedicated to streamlining the hiring process and enhancing
recruiting outreach efforts in high schools, colleges, universities, and entertainment venues.

Levering Technology to Combat Crime
The advancement of technology has created an avenue towards greater crime reduction and suspect apprehension. Police departments
choosing to incorporate this trend have instituted a variety of strategies to leverage technology. The Southfield Police Department, in
collaboration with multiple agencies throughout Southeast Michigan, have acquired Flock Safety Camera License Plate Readers. The high-quality
cameras are affixed to existing light poles and can capture images of vehicles and their license plates (speeds up to 100 m.p.h.) day or night. The
investigative benefits of the system include detection and identification of the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Stolen vehicles
Missing persons (Amber Alerts)
Wanted persons
Sex offenders
Terrorists
Personal Protection Orders (PPO)

The system also allows for participating agencies equipped with the technology to share the data among each other. The Southfield Police
Department understands the value in leveraging technology and will continue to enhance technology as useful developments become available.

-266-

...

�Chapter q: Public Facilities and Services
Police Dcparhncnt

Greater Emphasis on Organizational Accountability
A key emphasis on accountability is related to sustaining public trust in the community that the police department has committed to serve and
protect. Greater organizational accountability will include policies and procedures that reinforce the reduction of use of force incidents and the
identification of national best practices in training. De-escalation and other harm reduction tactics increases officer and community safety.
However, prope r supervision accompanied with courageous leadership will ultimately be the essential component needed to strengthen the
relationship between police and community.
It is important to note that the Southfield Police Department initiated the national movement for the "Duty to Intervene." The Southfield Police
Department has also instituted an internal Crisis Intervention Team which focuses on response to mental health calls for service. The
Department is currently in the process of developing a sustainable plan for addressing mental health throughout the city. The strategy consists
of incorporating mental health professionals to assist police officers in addressing non-emergency mental health related calls.

Key Findings and Future Plans
The Southfield Police Department has specific priorities for the future including:
•
•
•

Continue implementation of non-traditional police management concepts, or the private sector approach to governmental
management. That is, increase the level of service by viewing the public and police employees as customers and addressing their needs.
Develop and encourage a leadership style that will support a high level of service by retaining and developing personnel.
Continue community policing programs, partnerships between police, business, schools, and residents, designed not only to solve crime,
but to help solve related problems.

For all public safety elements, it is important to remember that the more open and visible these departments and efforts are to the public, the
more at ease residents will feel. This will, in turn, garner long-term stability amongst residents and business owners and assist with residential
and economic growth .

-267-

-

�•

-

...

IIIIIIJ""

IIIIIIJ""" IIIIJ"
Chapter 9: Public J.'acilities and Services
Southfield Human Sc1"\·iccs Department (SHSD)

Southfield Human Services Department (SHSD)
Current Conditions
The Southfield Human Services Department offers short-term support services for Southfield residents who
may be experiencing hardship. The program is a "hand-up" and not a "hand-out," as it provides temporary
emergency resources and assistance while helping residents develop strategies to successfully resolve their
hardships. The Department's goal is to help residents overcome personal hurdles to achieve a satisfying and
productive quality of life.
SHSD promotes advocacy and awareness of quality-of-life issues that affect older adults and the physically
challenged. SHSD uses numerous services to give a helping hand to those who experience hardship. SHSD
also provides programs or facilitates program assistance for a broad range of community-related, quality of
life items.

Recent Programs and Initiatives

SOUTHFIELD HUMAN
SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MISSION

"We strive to offer services
and opportunities to promote
personal growth,
independence, dignity, and
respect for the citizens of
Southfield. Helping people to
help themselves, each other,
and the community."

Legal Aid
Pro bono legal consultations are provided by SHSD in partnership with Lakeshore Legal Aid .
Social Work Outreach Services
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Provide consultations/referrals/financial assistance to qualified families/older adults based on identified need (clothing, food, utility,
housing, furniture)
Partner with Focus Hope, The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), and Forgotten Harvest to provide food boxes to families/
older adults
Adopt-a-family program allows businesses, faith-based organizations, and residents to contribute food and gifts to families/older adults
during Thanksgiving and Christmas
Assist area veterans with special funding in conjunction with the Southfield Veterans Commission
Minor vehicle repair and employment solutions through a partnership with Tone Up For Tune Ups
Information sharing and community advocacy as the principal liaison connection between Commission On Senior Adults (COSA)
Partner with Southfield Goodfellows to ensure that no child is left behind at Christmas

-268-

~

�Chapter 9: Public l•acilitics and Services
Southfield Human Services Department (SHSD)

Educational Programs
Partner with My Brother's Keeper, Community Housing Network, and Oakland Livingston Human Services Agency to provide educational
programs (free homebuyer, youth symposium, financial literacy, etc.).

Key Trends and Challenges
Some key challenged facing the SHSD include :
•
•
•
•
•
•

Affordable housing and addressing needs of homeless
Increases in the city's senior population and low-income population
Providing dependable, quality, public transportation - especially for older adults
Increase of foreclosures and domino effect on surrounding property values
Financial assistance for residents experiencing hardship circumstances
Population with mental illness

-269-

�.

-

-

-

--

..,- - -

lllllr llllr f/11/r
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services
Southfield Schools District

Southfield Schools District
Map 33. School District Boundaries

The Southfield Public Schools District is located in the suburban
communities of Southfield and Lathrup Village. The district
comprises approximately 27 square miles in southeastern Oakland
County, Michigan. For more than 65 years, the community has
supported public schools by approving nearly every millage and
bond issue that has been put before the public for a vote. This
support allows the district to spend approximately $11,950 per
pupil.

~

9,

The majority of Southfield residents, and all of Lathrup Village, are
served by Southfield Public Schools. A small segment of the
population in the northeast corner of the City attends Birmingham
Public Schools, while some in the southeast corner attend Oak Park
Schools, as shown right.

Farmington
ublic
Schools

Mission Statement
The Southfield Public School District educates all students in a
collaborative, safe, supportive, and high-quality, student-centered
environment and prepares dynamic, innovative learners to compete
within the global society.

''

' .~

I

,- -,

r

I

---~--,

11

--,
ll
L-.r--J

I!

I

__ : ' ~tarencev~~-

----~-~ --- Sch~o"''bls- "'

Southfield
Public
Schools

._,

(
(

'

I

I

l _ J

[
ark-

-----

-

--~.-:.-

Source: Oakland County Planning and Economic Development Services

Current Conditions
School Sites
In 2022, the Southfield Public School District had 12 school sites (reduced from 17 in 2009) located near and within the neighborhoods and
accessible by school bus or walking and biking including:
[Morris] Adler Elementary School
[Alice M.] Birney Middle School
Bussey Center for Early Childhood Education
[John F.] Kennedy Elementary School
[Glenn] Levey Middle School
MacArthur Elementary School
[Helen] McIntyre Elementary School
-270-

~

�Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Service,:
Southfield Schools District

Southfield High School for the Arts and Technology
[Adlai] Stevenson Elementary School
[Mary] Thompson Middle School
University Middle/High School Academy
[Arthur H.] Vandenberg Elementary School

EARLY CHILDHOOD

A further reduction of school sites is expected in the 2026-27 school year. In May 2019, the City of Southfield
created the Residential Unit Development District (RUDD) to provide flexible zoning to encourage innovative
redevelopment of vacant or underutilized former school buildings and sites. In July 2022, the Southfield School
Board heard proposals for 4 school-owned properties that the Board may divest for redevelopment purposes:
Brace Lederle, Leonhard, a vacant parcel adjacent to Thompson, and a large, SO-acre undeveloped parcel of
property located on Inkster Road between Ten and Eleven Mile Roads. Proposals ranged from private school
use to duplex and triplex workforce housing, to single family residential site condominium units. Final decisions
will be made by the Board at a future meeting.
For more information on the potential use of School District sites for "missing middle" housing, please see the
Restructuring section at the end of this chapter and the Reuse of School Sites section in Chapter 4.

Accreditation
In 2008, Southfield Public Schools became the sixth school district in Michigan to receive district accreditation
from the AdvancED/North Central Association (NCA) of Colleges and Schools. All regular K-12 schools in the
Southfield School District are fully accredited by NCA. The Bussey Center is accredited by the National
Association for the Education of Young Children. This means that Southfield schools meet nationally recognized
standards for quality.

"Early Childhood is an
essential time for children to
learn as this is when the
foundation of learning is
cemented for the rest of their
lives. Children benefit
developmentally, socially,
and academically from
participating in high-quality
early care and education
(ECE) programs. A plethora of
research studies have
indicated that high quality
early education promotes
school readiness,
literacy/numeracy skills, and
other positive short and long
term outcomes."
(Source: The Short and Long
Term Impacts of Large Public
Early Care and Education
Programs, Morrissey, Feb 28

2014)

Early Warning Legislation
In July of 2015, "Early Warning" legislation was signed into law by Governor Snyder, which is a Michigan law (P.A. 109 of 2015) that requires
schools to submit a balanced budget with a 5% fund balance for the two most recent years. This legislation requires th€l Southfield Public School
District to show a two-year balanced budget. If this threshold is not met, the State requires the school district to enter into an enhanced deficit
elimination plan. If the district fails to submit or comply with this plan, the State may appoint an emergency manager and transfer control of the
district's finances over to the Department of Treasury.
In 2015, the Southfield Public School District realized that their current model was unsustainable and needed to act proactively to restructure in
order to stay solvent.

-271-

�-

-

111111111""

--

--

Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Scr\'ices
Southfield Schools District

Figure 27. Southfield Public Schools 2022
Statistics

Key Trends and Challenges
Reduction in Student Population
In 1969, the Southfield Public School district had an enrollment of 16,350, which has dropped
to 5,036 students in 2022. The District lost 38% of its revenue over the past 10 years due to
declining enrollment. The estimated student population forecast for school year 2026-27 is
4,044 to 4,147 students. The reduction of student population can be attributed to many State
and national trends:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

The 'baby boomlet' population bubble has graduated
Michigan birth rates are down
Michigan is still recovering from the out-migration during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The overall population of Southfield has declined from a high of 78,322 in 2000
Fewer people are living in each household
The housing crisis is driving resident to remain in their homes longer post-children
A large inventory of vacant houses in Southfield
Rise in Charter School enrollment
Oakland County Open Enrollment has meant that more students opt-out than opt-in
Rise in homeless students
Increase in Orthodox Jewish residents who send their children to religious schools

Pandemic-Related Teacher Shortages and Online Classes
Principals, superintendents, and counselors are filling in as substitutes in classrooms as the
surge in coronavirus infections further strains schools that already had been struggling with
staffing shortages. Staff absences and the variant-driven surges have led some big districts,
including Detroit, to switch temporarily to virtual learning. Where schools are holding the line
on in-person learning, getting through the day has required an all-hands-on-deck approach,
with some districts even brining in military members as temporary staff.

Elementary

2,596

Middle School

620

High School

1,679

Total

4,895

General Operating

16.9492 mills

Debt Retirement

2.3000 mills

Total

19.2492 mills

2020-21 Expenditure

I Est. $93,894,857

2021-22 Expenditure

Est. $93,407,253

2022 State Equalized
Value

$2,762,835,212

2021-22 Drop Out
Rate

3.25%

2021-22 Graduation
Rate

89.45%

The COVID-19 Pandemic has also impacted the way the District delivers instruction. The
District now offers virtual and remote learning options that are used in instances when it's not
possible to deliver instruction in-person. The District also offers online courses for students in the credit recovery program as well as students
looking for specialized courses through independent study.

-272-

~

�Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Services
Southfield Schools District

Key Findings and Future Plans
Updated Technology
All of Southfield's school facilities are modern and up-to-date, meeting all current fire, safety, and Barrier-Free standards. A modern instructional
and administrative technology system is in place. The district provides one computer for every three students. Additionally, all classrooms have
access to laptops, LCD projectors, and iPads for elementary students. The District's technology focused classrooms also utilize SMART Boards and
USB microscopes.
Class Size
The ratio of professional staff to students in the Southfield Public Schools is 1 to 15, meaning class sizes are relatively small. Maximum class sizes
are as follows: Kindergarten-grade 1, 27 students max; grades 2-3, 28 max; grades 4-5, 29 max; grades 6-8, 30 max; and grades 9-12, 32 max.
Occasionally, a class will exceed the numbers stated above and a teacher assistant is assigned to classrooms above the stated maximums.
Restructuring
Restructuring of the district will occur in 2026-27. The proposed changes include:
•

•
•

•
•
•
•

Closing Vandenberg, McIntyre, Southfield Regional Academic Campus and Magnolia Center. Students affected by these closures will be
assigned a new home school according to a new educational pathways structure. Parents will also have the option to select a school of
choice based on availability.
Relocating the SRAC Credit Recovery program to the Southfield High School for the Arts and Technology campus and develop a plan to
sunset the program.
Combining University Middle and High School Academy with MacArthur K-8 University Academy to create a new University K-12
University Academy. This will remain an examination school with admission based on an entrance exam at the middle and high school
levels.
Launching a JROTC program in partnership with the United States Air Force.
Maintaining all current programs.
Elementary and middle school students who live more than a mile from school and high school students whu :ive more than a 1 ½ miles
will receive transportation as usual. School of choice students will not receive transportation according to district policy.
Partner with the school district to find innovative solutions for adaptive use and infill housing at many of the closed and underutilized
school building sites.

-273-

�•

-

-

- - ..- ... ..- II/Ir
Chapter 9: Public Facilities and Sc1~ices
Goals, Ohjccth·es, and Strategics

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies
Goals
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Improve public transit for older adults, low-income riders, and people with disabilities
Provide excellent public facilities
Recognize and respect Southfield's diverse community through a care and wellness approach in identifying and responding to
community social needs
Promote recognition and inclusion of multicultural differences and lifestyles
Assist families in keeping and purchasing homes suited for their needs and financial ability
Develop and promote educational opportunities and resources that will assist residents in achieving a higher and healthier
quality of life
Ensure that all elements of the built environment, including land use, transportation, housing, energy, and infrastructure, work
together to provide sustainable, green places for living, working, and recreation, with a high quality of life by
Ensure fairness and equity in providing for the housing, services, health, safety, and livelihood needs of all residents and groups
by providing accessible, quality public services, facilities, and health care to the community
Improve the City's preparedness, resilience, and adaptability in the face of both natural and human-caused hazards
Ensure that all local proposals account for, connect with, and support the plans of adjacent jurisdictions and the surrounding
region
Provide opportunities for life-long learning and increased collaborations and partnerships with agencies that provide services
to the City
Use environmental justice principles to reduce exposure to toxins and pollutants and provide equitable green space access

Objectives and Strategies
o
o
o

Provide Establish community-wide Wi-Fi
Explore options for additional public or workforce housing
Increase collaborations/partnerships with other low-income support agencies to provide services through the Southfield
Human Services Department

-274-

~ ·

�I

�-

L'

-

--

--

--

_.-

fl/I/IT

�Chapter 10: Implementation
Implementation Matrix

Chapter 10: Implementation
Implementation Matrix
The Implementation Matrix (below consolidates all the goals and
objectives from Chapters 3 through 9 into a single table. Each
objective is assigned a timeline, priority, and a lead agency,
department, or public board/commission. The purpose of the
Implementation Matrix is to keep the City of Southfield accountable
for the Master Plan and to ensure the goals are translated into reality.

Higher Priority

H

Near-Term

NT

1-2 years

Medium Priority

M

Medium-Term

MT

3-5 years

Lower Priority

L

Long-Term

LT

5-10 years

LEAD CODES KEV -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Boards and Commissions
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

CC= City Council
CCAB = City Centre Advisory Board
COSA = Commission on Senior Adults
CPAB = Citizens Police Advisory Board
CSC = Civil Service Commission (Police and
Fire)
DOA = Downtown Development Authority
DCAC = ODA Citizens Area Council
EDC = Economic Development Corporation
HOC= Historic District Commission
HDAB = Historic Designation Advisory Board
LB &amp; LBA = Library Board &amp; Library Building
Authority
PAC= Public Arts Commission
PC= Planning Commission
PRB = Parks and Recreation Board
o SHC = Southfield Housing Commission

o
o

TLC= Total Living Commission
WAC= Wildlife Advisory Commission

Departments
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

CAD= City Administrator
AD= Assessing
BD = Building
BOD = Business Development
CED = Code Enforcement
CRD = Community Relations
EDD = Economic Development
EMO=-= Emergency Management
ED = Engineering
FD= Fire
HD= Housing
HR= Huma Resources
HSD = Human Services
LB = Library
MO= Mayor's Office

-277-

o
o
o
o
o

0MB = Office of Management and Budget
PRO= Parks and Recreation
PD= Police
PL = Planning
DPW = Public Works

Agencies
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

COS= Southfield Chamber of Commerce
LTU = Lawrence Tech University
MOOT= Michigan Department of
Transportation
OC = Oakland County
OCMW = Oakland County Michigan Works
SNRI = Southfield Neighborhood
Revitalization initiative
SPSD = Southfield Public School District
SEMCOG = Southeast Michigan Council of
Governments
SMART = SMART Bus

�•

-·- --

--

...

~

...... lllr lllr f/ll//r
Chapter 10: Implementation
Implementation Matrix

Table 10. Implementation Plan Table

CH

0

•
•
•

•
tlO

C

'&gt;
~

•

&gt;

.r:.
I

~
n,
G,J

:I:

.;;

•

:I:

u

•

~

~Mi®

Goals
1

oca1

TOO □

0

0°" 0

I

•

Promote exercise programs
-Promote and provicle more public sports events and
programs
Promote public and semi-public exercise facilities {outdoor
and indoor)
Identify locations for and construct community gardens
Create provisions that allow for more flexible placement of
community gardens throughout the city
Adopt zoning policies and regulations that promote and
support urban agriculture activities
Revisit and update internal hiring diversity policy
Provide technical assistance and outreach efforts that
increase equal access to land use resources and economic
development tools
Promote greater equality of access to minority business
development and support land use and zoning that
increases goods and services in resource poor
neighborhoods
Hold annual bike-the-town events to encourage people to
get comfortable with and excited about cycling
Revise the city's Public Engagement Plan to incorporate
more innovative and inclusive engagement methods that
are shown to be effective in reaching under-served
populations

-

n, -

..
C ',ij
~ t I•
'iii r::: ~
::s

0

:I:

G,J

:'2
II)

n,

~

.r:.

~ ~ u

•

:I:

u

I

to;:-]

Make Southfield a more attr; ctive place
younger families
Retain neighborhood character while
improving the quality of homes, public
facilities, and infrastructure
Support quality, safe, and affordable
housing in a variety of types, sizes,
locations, and costs to meet the needs of

Expand the allowable uses in the single-family zoning
~ istrict to include more attached housing types by-right
Provide mixed-use and higher density residential options
Eliminate Euclidian zoning where feasible

I

Develop Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations
Promote and provide incentives for green building and
alternative energy techniques
Regulate short-term rentals (i.e., Airbnbs, VRBO, etc.) --

-·

-273-

l;:

Priority

COSA,PRD
PRO, SPSD

NT
NT

M
M

PRO, SPSD

I LT

D

Reduce city' obesity rates and encourage
healthy food choices, especially among
children
Promote alternative modes of mobility with
a focus on active transportation and micromobility
Work toward improved mental health
outcomes for the community
Promote active living by making it safer to
walk or bike to daily activities like shopping,
work, school, and recreation
Build a more equitable community where
the health and well-being of all people is
supported, regardless of age, ethnicity,
national origin, or disability status
Engage in outreach that targets minorities
and under-represented groups in
community meetings, land use and
planning commission, and hiring decisions
Promote and encourage individual and
communal time and energy available for
such things as community improvement,
social networking, civic engagement,
personal recreation, and other activities
that create social bonds between
individuals and groups
I

"C
C

Timeline

Q,ll

.-omme eaucauona, orog

I

H

PRD,COSA
PL, PC

MT
MT

PL, PC

NT

iL

NT
MT

IH

BOD, PL

MT

I H

PRD,CCAB

MT

M

CAD, PL,
BOD

NT

M

I MT

IM

MT

_J M
L

HR
BOD

_bl,
·rl,

--

PC

PL, PC
PL, PC

--

---

PC

I L
~~

LT

L

' H

_

BO

LT
MT :

PL, PC, BO

MT

r

H
H

�Chapter 10: Implementation
Implementation Matrix

•

•
•

•

...
C

•

•

QI

E

0.

0

'ii
&gt;
QI
C

•

·e

•

C:

•

u

0

0

u
w

iii
::i::

u

Pl, PC, HDC,
MT
~eserve historical and architectural character, especially
ur Mid-Century Modern architecture, and promote the
I HDAB
habilitation and re-use of existing structures, where
asible
ovide affordable housing that is well maintained and
SNRI, SHC
LT
eets the needs of the entire community
__
Seek partners and funding to increase the supply of
COSA,SHC
MT
housing for older adults, including developments that
. support aging in place
Promote new development that conveys a positive sense of PL, CCAB
NT
place
Incorporate traditional, walkable, pedestrian -friendly
PL
NT
design into new and existing residential neighborhoods
through design standards
TLC
MT
Encourage and promote programs that help people
maintain the quality and appearance of individual
properties
Create pedestrian links that connect neighborhoods with
PL
LT
each other, major community features, and regional assets
--PL
Review ordinances, codes, regulations, and permitting
MT
processes to eliminate or modify conflicting and excessive
requirements and to streamline the regulatory review
process
PL, PC
NT
f Provide more infill housing options in the future land use
plan and zoning ordinance
----- Create programs and amenities that attract and retain
BDD, COC
I LT
Retain, expand, and attract businesses
young professionals
Remain business-friendly and continue to
Investigate methods to support the increasingly remote
I LT
provide business incentives to maintain an
BDD, COC
workforce
equal playing field
- - PL, BDD, CC LT
Maintain Redevelopment Ready Communities (RRC)
Support a more diverse economy and tax
certification
base
Encourage innovation and the growth of
Initiate sustainable urban (re)development strategies that
PL, BDD ~
T
emerging business sectors
foster green business growth and build reliance on local
I
Develop local talent in an inclusive, diverse,
assets
__
and comprehensive matter
Encourage the preservation of the city's historic assets,
PL, HDC,
LT
1
including historic neighborhoods, Mid-Century Modern
I HDAB
buildings, and the former Northland Center area

age or income
Support a land use pattern and land use
designations that provide for housing
opportunities at varying densities and at
appropriate locations consistent with the
Land use Plan
Make Southfield an age-friendly
community where residents can age-inplace in their homes in comfort
Provide a diverse and stable housing stock
providing for a range of housing
opportunities for all income groups and a
quality living environment for all persons
Retain property values

I H
H

I

I H

_l

H

I

-r

- - - -

H

---

-274-

I H

H

--

H

I H
I H

M
I H
I H

I H

�_, -

. . .I

•
•
•

•

•
QI
Ill

::::)

"'0

C

....."'
QI

u.

•

"'0

C

"'0.0
C

·,.:;
Ill

·;
LLI

\D
::c

u

111111111""

111111111""

f///1/r f///1/r f///1/r
Chapter 10: Implementation
Implementation Matrix

•

...
....::,::,

...

•

Provide start-up businesses with both financial and
technical assistance
Recruit growing businesses that are suited to the region
and are seeking a highly skilled work force or are willing to
train an entry-level work force
Continually upgrade technology infrastructure to meet
future need
Provide information to local businesses about funding
support and investment opportunities
Assist local firms in finding appropriate development sites
for expansion
Facilitate the development of neighborhood business
centers through land use and zoning
Cooperate with local educational institutions to coordinate
training/skill requirements to meet the needs of local
employers
Assist older adults in finding both paid and volunteer job
opportunities
Identify the economic needs of the chronically unemployed
and underemployed in the region and develop
programming- including education and retraining -- to
meet those needs
--Establish community engagement strategies to solicit ideas
from our civic leaders, business community, and
neighborhood homeowner and condominium associations
on creating economic vitality, walkability, and recreational
opportunities throughout the City

Improve the learning-to-job pipeline for
people at all levels of secondary and postsecondary education
Attract and retain young professional and
skilled older professionals
Cultivate external businesses relationships
to connect to the regional economy
Establish and maintain housing,
transportation, communication, and utility
systems which foster quality development
Encourage development that is
environmentally sensitive and sustainable

-

Offer unified, well-organized, walkable
residential neighborhoods that provide a
variety of housing options, and recreational
and social opportunities, and community
assets in a livable environment for the
City's residents
Provide for an appropriate amount of
mixed-use commercial, office, industrial,
and recreational uses, located for
convenience, safety, and leisure, resulting
in aesthetic business areas in the City
Provide for a mix of housing options for
singles, families, and older adults with
...

- -- -

Regularly evaluate economic and market trends that will
establish the land use policies and alternatives to be
considered, including demographic, socioeconomic,
housing, and transportation trends
r Identify economic sectors that have the potential to - contribute to the type of economic development being
sought by the City, including addressing the needs of
underserved populations and fostering growth in targeted
industries

I LT

H

CA

I LT

IH

...

Trr ___ -

BDD,DDA
BOD, DDA

BDD

l H

LT

M

LT

I H

LT

I H

I LT

I L

--i

COSA,BDD
BDD

I

MT

PL, PC

IH

i :L, BDD

H

~

PL, BDD

M

I LT

PL, BDD

I

-275-

~

BDD

LT

LT

--

IM

�Chapter to: Implc.mcntation
Implementation Matrix

•

•

•

increased density, walkability, and mixed use in our neighborhoods and along major
corridors in the City
Create a diversified and balanced mixture
of land uses that will support the economic
vitality, tax base, and livability of the City

Identify the market prospects facing various real estate
development and investment projects, particularly in
locations that might be targeted for growth and/or change
Create a procedure or practice to identify economic and
fiscal implications of various policies or land use regulations
Align the Zoning Ordinance with the goals of the Master
Plan
Streamline the approval process and work toward having
site plans for permitted uses approved administratively or
by the Planning Commission
Implement the Nine Mile Corridor connectivity objectives
Establish viable and high-quality
in coordination with adjacent communities (1-75 to 1-275)
commercial, residential, and office districts
that promote transit and pedestrianSupport the Oakland Community College redevelopment
friendly development to connect those
project
----------districts with each other and the
Provide for both vertical mixed-use ( lower floors of
surrounding community
commercial and upper floors residential or office) and
Provide for high quality, integrated
horizontal mixed use on an entire block that allows
communities providing a diverse range of
residents to live, work, and play in the same general
uses and development to sustain a diverse
location
economy, including offices, retail,
Improve the public realm through creation of contextentertainment, institutions, services,
sensitive built environment
recreation and leisure, and restaurants
Promote development strategies for the rehabilitation and
Respond to a growing market demand for
re-purposing of existing structures, conservation, and
walkable, vibrant communities with
sustainable/green building design
convenient transit linkages, proximity to
I Provide for a mixture of land uses, including retail and
jobs, and access to nearby public services
residential, that help to generate positive pedestrian
and spaces and activity-oriented
activity in_an area
-destinations
Provide for a variety of housing options, including higher
Continue to implement the individual goals
density mixed-use developments along our major corridors,
and objectives of each Sub-Area Plan and
where development has been challenging due to shallow
their key redevelopment areas
lots and obsolete buildings
Provide an environment conductive to and
Develop shared-use pathways throughout the City to
support of living, working, shopping, and
connect users with public transit to key destinations in the
entertainment
City and beyond
Strengthen the physical and social
Identify and market opportunities sites for infill to take
connections within and between
! advantage of existing infrastructure and reduce the need
communities
for new facilities

•
Ill

C

ns

i:L
ns

...

Cl.I

•

&lt;
.h
~

V)

;.:.
~

u

•

1

-276-

LT

IM

PL, BOD

LT

IH

PL, PC

NT

I

H
__ I

PL, PC, CC

NT

H

PL, CA, PAC

MT

IH

I

I LT

M

NT

IH

PL, CCAB,

I LT

IH

DOA
PL, BO

I LT

IH

-+L, PC

I MT

IH

PL, PC

NT

IH

LT

IH

I LT

•H

DOA
PL, PC

---

•

PL, BOD

1

I

PL,

I PL,

PC

�- - -- - - --

Chapter 10: Implementation
Implementation Matrix

Target development opportunities to nearby, compatible
land uses to shorten trips and facilitate alternative modes
of transportation, such as walking, bicycling, and public
transit
Provide a combination of financial and regulatory
incentives to mixed-use developers, such as permit fee
reductions and expedited approvals, tax abatements, and
dimensional bonuses
Provide regulatory flexibility with regard to building height,
housing density, floor area, lot coverage, yard setback,
landscaping, and other zoning provisions for mixed-use
developments in key areas targeted for growth
Implement modern parking management tactics, including
shared parking, parking reductions and minimum parking
eliminations, maximum parking standards, shared vehicles,
proximity to transit, valet parking, and bicycle parking

•
•

I•
a,

:;

~

V

...
"'...C
::,

~

--~
Ill

:c::,
0.

cici
:::c

u

•

r

BOD, CC

PL

L

t::
I

i
PL

1=l

- I

Ensure sustainability improvements are
Hire a Sustainability Planner
distributed equitably across the city
Establish a Sustainability and Climate Action Plan Task
Force
Ensure that all elements of the built
environment, including land use,
Create and adopt a Sustainability and Climate Action Plan
transportation, housing, energy, and
document
infrastructure, work together to provide
I Adopt a Climate Action Resolution by City Council
sustainable, green places for living,
Strive for a formal Complete Streets Policy, beyond that
working, and recreation, with a high quality i included in the Master Plan, and a Vision Zero Action Plan
of life
Join the International Council for Local Environmental
Ensure that contributions of natural
Initiatives (ICLEI)
resources to human well -being are
Engage City Staff and Elected Officials in sustainability
explicitly recognized and valued and that
education efforts and surveys to establish baseline
maintaining their health is a primary
sustainability knowledge
objective
Recruit external partners to form a Sustainability Advisory
Promote active living by making it safer to
Board
walk or bike to daily activities like shopping, Author educational material for City events that promote
work, school, and recreation
sustainable practices
Support and adopt Smart Growth policies
Ensure infrastructure projects do not adversely impact
to ensure the community is socially,
disadvantaged communities or the natural environment
economically, and environmentally
Require Low Impact Design elements to be incorporated
sustainable
into all new development and major redevelopment sites

PL
PL

I

I

-277-

H

j

I

MT

H

NT
MT

H
H

PL

H

CC

I LT

H
M

CA

I NT

H

PL

NT

H

PL

NT

H

PL

NT

H

ED

LT

H

PL, ED

LT

H

�Chapter 10: lmplcmcntation
Implementation Matrix

•

•
•
•

•

Educate the community about
sustainability initiatives and opportunities
to lower their impact on the planet
Foster partnerships with sustainability
experts to create a network of knowledge
Facilitate access to information and
communication technology
Develop policies that focus on higher
quality of life through clean air and water,
beautiful parks and green spaces, and clean
and efficient energy use
Promote the public welfare and serve the
public interest, convenience, and
enjoyment through the promotion of the
arts in the City of Southfield

I

l

Educate the local community through website content,
brochures, flyers, banners, and newsletters
Engage the local community by inviting them to City
Council meetings, sustainability workshops, and other
events
Promote growth management through infrastructure
investments using regional agencies such as Oakland
County and SEMCOG as a forum for evaluating needs
Provide security and emergency response in regard to
critical infrastructure through cooperation with State and
Federal authorities to continually assess infrastructure
systems and remedy potential vulnerabilities
Direct telecommunications infrastructure towards underserved neighborhoods and communities
Cooperate with regulatory agencies to ensure the provision
of reliable and affordable telecommunication services
Implement the Safe Systems approach across the City's
transportation systems
Commit to and prioritize a systems-based approach to
Vision Zero focusing on the built environment, systems,
and policies
Adopt messaging that emphasizes that traffic losses are
preventable
Build more shared use pathways, bike routes, and other
non-motorized transit options
Establish more physical works of art in public places
throughout the City
Provide aesthetic, well-maintained streets and sidewalks
and work to fill sidewalk gaps
Continue the construction of infrastructure for electric
vehicles

PL

NT

PL

NT -

H

, H

I

I

CA

LT

M

EMO, CA

LT

H

+

i

TLC/HSD
CC

PL, ED

LT

H

LT

H

+-

-

LT

IH
H

LT

H

PL, PAC

LT

H

PL, ED

LT

H

CA

LT

H

Continue to work with local higher-education providers to
research and test emerging mobility options

CA, BOD

LT

H

Adopt local ordinances protecting pedestrians on sidewalks
and crosswalks

PL, CA

NT

H

-278-

PL, ED

H

I

ED
PL, ED

LT

�I:

t

......

.....

....

,,,-

....- ...,. ...,. ,,,,,,.. ,,,,,, ,,,,,, ""' tllllr II/Ir

Chapter 10: Implementation
Implementation Matrix

Adopt local ordinances regulating the speed of electric
bicycles, scooters, and autonomous delivery vehicles on
pedestrian sidewalks and non -motorized pathways
PL, DPW,
MT
Create maintenance and site development policies that
H
CA
acknowledge and incorporate trees as a "living utility"
Amend the Zoning Ordinance to require recycling
PL
i H
bins/dumpsters with screening for each multi-family
residential development. Encourage recycling programs at
each development
CCBA,SPSD NT
Support
City Centre Wi-Fi
Improve public transit for older adults, lowH
HSD,CA
LT
L
Explore
options
for
additional
public
or
workforce
housing
income riders, and people with disabilities
HSD
LT
H
Increase collaborations/partnerships with other lowProvide excellent public facilities
income
support
agencies
to
provide
services
through
the
Recognize and respect Southfield's diverse
Southfield Human Services Department
_
community through a care and wellness
LT
H
Explore alternative funding sources to assist low-income
HSD
approach in identifying and responding to
residents
community social needs
LT
M
Work with the Commission on Senior Adults (COSA)
COSA, PL
Promote recognition and inclusion of
Committee to develop an age-friendly action plan
_
multicultural differences and lifestyles
LT
H
Develop translated versions of City service materials and
HR
Assist families in keeping and purchasing
make translation services clearly available and easy to use
homes suited for their needs and financial
ability
LT
L
Assist in the development of community-based budget and
CA
financial planning initiatives
Develop and promote educational
opportunities and resources that will assist
LT
M
Explore residents' housing responsibilities regarding
HSD
residents in achieving a higher and
upkeep of properties if receiving housing-related financial
healthier quality of life
assistance
Ensure that all elements of the built
LT
M
Explore and expand opportunities for the CHORE program I HSD, CA
environment, including land use,
to support the City's curb appeal initiative
transportation, housing, energy, and
LT
H
Develop methods to meet the educational needs of older
COSA
infrastructure, work together to provide
adults consistent with their developmental stage and assist
sustainable, green places for living,
older adults whose cognitive abilities are compromised
working, and recreation, with a high quality Educate the public on maternal, prenatal, and neonatal
LT
H
HS
of life by
health concerns and ways to improve infant health
Ensure fairness and equity in providing for
outcomes and early learning capacity
the housing, services, health, safety, and
LT
H
Provide workshops on personal finances/budgeting,
I HS
livelihood needs of all residents and groups
foreclosure prevention, homebuyer education, legal
by providing accessible, quality public
~ nsultations through partnerships with external agenc_i_es_ ~ ~ - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - i

LT

•
•
•

•
•
•
II)

a,

u

-~a,

•

V')

"0
C

ta
II)

a,

~

·uta
I.I.

-~
::c
:::,

Q.

°'u:c

•

I

I

-279-

I

�Chapter 10: lmJ&gt;lcmcnlation
lmplcmcntation Matrix

•
•

•

•

services, facilities, and health care to the
community
Improve the City's preparedness, resilience,
and adaptability in the face of both natural
and human-caused hazards
Ensure that all local proposals account for,
connect with, and support the plans of
adjacent jurisdictions and the surrounding
region
Provide opportunities for life-long learning
and increased collaborations and
partnerships with agencies that provide
services to the City
Use environmental justice principles to
reduce exposure to toxins and pollutants
and provide equitable green space access

such as the Community Housing Network, Legal Aid and
Defender Association, and Lighthouse of Oakland County
Coordinate services with various agencies and religious
I HSD. CA
organizations such as churches, nonprofit organizations,
Tone Up for Tune Ups, Southfield Goodfellows, and the
Southfield Veterans Commission
Develop a more effective method of information
COSA,PRD
distribution among Southfield's senior adult population
Expand and support the efforts of the COSA's Homes for
COSA
the Aged Subcommittee to inspect and evaluate
Southfield's long-term care facilities
CA,HSD
Distribute information on homeowner responsibilities
regarding upkeep
ED, DPW
Upgrade infrastructure and facilities in locations where it is
older and/or substandard
Develop a strategy for addressing mental health crises in
HSD
conjunction with the Police and Human Services
Departments
PL, ED
Coordinate local developments and improvements with
regional transportation investments to ensure the most
efficient use of resources
Create a joint calendar of events highlighting both City of
CA
Southfield's and other agencies' events
Provide resources for older adults to find trusted
COSA, HS,
contractors and service providers for home repair, home
PRD
care/housekeeping, and personal care
Create context-responsive design options for multimodal
PL, ED,
transportation improvements that will help tailor them to
their location

-

I

I

-280-

I LT

H

LT

I H

I LT

I H

I LT

I H

I LT

H

I LT

I H

I LT

I H

H
I LT

M

' H

-

�r

I -

.... .... ....

...,.

.....

--- ,.,,- ,.,,. ,.,,. ,., ,,,
Chapter

10:

Implementation
oning Plan
1

'

Zoning Plan
Planning and land use experts recognize that the current zoning code model is antiquated. Cornell Law School Professor, architect, and attorney
Sara Bronin's paper entitled 11Zoning by a Thousand Cuts: The Prevalence and Nature of Incremental Regulatory Constraints on Housing" (Branin,
2021) describes how 20th century zoning practices are no longer optimal for 21 st century development patterns and why code reform is needed.
Bron in explains that the elimination of traditional single-family zoning is widely agreed-upon and would be the most impactful. Single-family
zoning was originally intended to separate people from one another which unintentionally (or intentionally) separated various racial and income
groups, thereby creating and fostering segregation and inequality. Further, she argues that single-family zoning:
•
•
•

Drives up development costs (i.e., minimum lot sizes limit community growth and therefore increases land value or creates sprawl
by pushing development outward, creating the need to build additional infrastructure to serve the new development);
Degrades the environment; and
Creates too-homogenous communities

The downside is that changing the housing landscape and associated zoning policy has proven to be more complex than merely lifting regulatory
restrictions on multi-family zoning, carte blanche. Branin points out that datasets collected within her home state, Connecticut, illustrate that
simply increasing minimum lot sizes, minimum unit sizes, building height, and floor-to-area ratios may not result in the real-world construction
of higher density development. In addition, current zoning data, on which other experts have made broad determinations and
recommendations, has proven to be unreliable and incomplete.
Bron in concludes that although implementation of commonly-advocated changes that accompany the elimination of traditional single-family
zoning, such as added provisions for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), working around site-specific natural features (such as Southfield's Cluster
Option provisions), and permitting multi-family uses outright, she believes a complete overhaul of the way zoning regulations relate to housing
affordability and diversity is the answer, but more research and analysis is needed to determine the best way to do so. Her hope is that the
Connecticut dataset could be modeled at a national level to create a more consistent basis for future policy change recommendations which
would ultimately 11 foster more equitable, sustainable, well-designed, and connected places."

Planned Future Land Use Plan Amendments
o

Create eligible Mixed-Use Corridor Districts (MUCDs) and regulations

-281-

~

�Chapter

10:

lm]llcmcnlation
''oning Plan

Zoning Code Map Plan
Map 34. Zoning Code Map Plan

-------

Vill.1~c of l'lt \\:rlv 1Lill

~

r

11,
Rt

• •2

0

..
,:

...t

R•J

c
~l(l"l&gt;l&gt;l li,:,tik,;

.ri-Jn~-r
-~

D ""r~l ... cumJo..-l)1otri&lt;1&gt;(\ll ( ' llJl.bitihJ.
[Z] l'iu1•H&lt;'fl l ii\ I', lli..irirr
[Z] ._.,-wthu~u 11.:llffol\ C,,r11&lt;l•ir
111,~

~ ·' "= Z••tc· I&gt;

D
D
D

....

II .\ l,k· llhd Cumdor
, ·,-lk1 \\ ,,..J. ..,_,. ( amp.u t?o1w1HJ11ir)· ltn1LUIT.llltm I

:-..i1IIJic-ld ' l', -.'lu1t,J.,c:\·( ',.ir,l,•

□ V.i11hf1rlrl Ill&gt;\

~-

i'rnu111: I)nln. h

-- •w1 -1

- •h1
-

nu,

-

IRl).\I

--····•

M-t

M•f

Wti-ltd - -

.,
l Ir

Mt

--

I

M-1.

--

••

0:

111

I
L-,

:

- ·(.I

- - 11~,

_ -

·-

\ Ml

. i.,

I

_ _ RL

M-t l::1111

i

- R&lt;

M· I

l i i l l(\I

r7., I i'

.....__

LJll\l\l
I
I

!

_R,

R-2

!

11\11'
!)\\

-

Ill

---.IY-11

Miles
0

-282-

0.5

-

�I'

.....

~

... ...

... ,.. ,,.,. ,,,,, ,,,,, ti/IT ,,., . ,
Chapter

10:

Implementation
oning Plan
1
,.

Zoning Code Text Plan
Article

Section

5

••

2

•

Discrepancy between definition of garage and accessory building provisions regarding height - all should be 15 ft maximum height
Update definition of "family"

2
2

:

2

:

2

•

4

:I

4

:I

'

Description

Define Print Shop

.
--Clarify of what constitutes a bar within a restaurant, thereby requiring a Special Land Use permit

:

Add definition and provisions for beekeeping and residential chickens
Affordable Housin_
g Overlay (AHO)
Add "1Q!u a ~ ::1,·ovicirw::

__ . _

-

5.371(C}(1}(d)
5.371(C)(1}(g)
5.5
5.56
5.33
5.58?
5.60-B?

_ 5.64

_

5.35

-

TBD

mllllll 5.8
All
5.176
5.193 &amp;
5.194

__.

. __ -·· ______ .
.

Amend the Permitted Uses within the Southfield Technology Corridor ODD to allow for Electric Vehicle (EV) research, testing,
maintenance, and repair facilities.
Clarify of setback for "double fronted lots" and for lots with side yard abutting a street to be consistent
Update language regarding naturally decay-resistant wood, rather than water-resistant
Add provisions for "breweries, microbrewery, distilleries subject to the Michigan Liquor Control Commission requirements"
Eliminate tree permits for tree removals (i.e., 10 trees or less per year) in single family residential districts for lots less than 20,000
sq. ft.
Clarify roof screening using graphics - not required if not visible from street. Example graphic/revisions:
·--b-.l. \ . .-.... ..:.1..J'

r OCJl:. ___ ~_c....L_r, 'v,;.;.IJ./ ___ J. :.JOI r.:_J .. ~~d '...::1--bf..c....ll

Wall Brick Facing- Unpierced Masonry: revise to allow that "the wall shall be faced with brick, brick stamped concrete or decorative
masonry" as determined by any person, commission, or council, having site_pla!)_jurisdiction
Add tiny home requirements/provisions
Revise fencing regulations for "double fronted lots" and for lots with side yard abutting a street. Provide exemptions for fencing
setbacks (i.e., side yard abutting a street, 25 ft setback required)
Add standards for recycling bins for multi-family developments
Eliminate; obsolete- no TR district anymore
Specify "Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to any of the above permitted uses, not including outdoor storage" in
the 1-L district
-- - - - - ·
Clarify that contiguous zoning can be considered towards mi~i~l!.n_,~c_r~age required for developmentJ:?..L_Jrposes
Per Increase lot coverage from 25% to 30-35%

-283-

�Chapter

10:

Implementation
--~onin~ Plan

Other Zoning Text Objectives
Adult Use Review (Recreational Marijuana)

The people of the State of Michigan approved the use of medical marihuana under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), P.A. 2008 as
amended, in November of 2008 and became effective on December 20, 2008. The MMMA allowed physician-approved use of marijuana for
certain medical conditions including cancer and AIDS. It also allowed patients to grow their own medicine, i.e., medical marihuana, and allowed
caregivers to grow marijuana for approved patients and required storage of medical marihuana in an enclosed, locked facility. The state law also
provided protections for the medical use of marihuana; provided for a system of registry identification cards for qualifying patients and primary
caregivers; to impose a fee for registry application and renewal; to make an appropriation; to provide for the promulgation of rules; to provide
for the administration of this act; to provide for enforcement of this act; to provide for affirmative defenses; and to provide for penalties for
violations of this act. On February 23, 2015, the Southfield City Council approved a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment for medical marihuana
facilities and introduced Ordinance #1637. Ordinance allowed for the establishment of grow facilities as Special Land Uses in the I-L Light
Industrial Zoning District with distance requirements from schools, churches, residential zoned or used property, etc., along with other
stipulations and requirements.
In 2016, the Marihuana Tracking Act (MTA) Public Act 282 of 2016 MCL 333.27901, et seq. and the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act
(MM FLA) Public Act 281 of 2016, MCL 333.27101, et seq. were established allowing for the growing and processing of medical marihuana, the
sale of medical marihuana and medical marihuana-infused products through provisioning centers, the transporting of medical marihuana and
medical marihuana-infused products, and testing of medical marihuana and marihuana-infused products. On October 3, 2019, the Southfield
City Council approved a new Text Amendment under Ordinance #1709 to allow for medical marihuana Growers and Processors as Special Land
Uses on I-L Light Industrial and I-1 Industrial properties in the Eight Mile Corridor area only, and the Northland Overlay Development District;
Provisioning Centers (retail facilities) as Special Land Uses in the 8-3 General Business District and the Northland Overlay Development District;
Safety Compliance Centers (testing facilities) as Permitted Uses in the OS Office Service District, ERO/ERO-M Education ResearchOffice/Education Research-Office Limited District, 8-3 General Business District and the Northland Overlay Development District; and Secure
Transporters as Special Land Uses in the I-L Light Industrial Zoning District, the I-1 Industrial District, and the Northland Overlay Development
District.
The State of Michigan legalized the use of Recreational Marihuana in December of 2018. However, the City of Southfield decided to opt out of
Recreational Use with the option to revisit it at a later date. When revisiting recreational marijuana, the use should be restricted to the same
locations as medical marijuana, if not a more narrow boundary.
On August 10, 2020, the Southfield City Council decided via Resolution to place a limit on the number of medical marihuana Provisioning Center,
Grower Facilities and Processing Facilities licenses to three each, subject to zoning approval, and unless otherwise approved by the Southfield
City Council.

-284-

-

�II

--·-

- - - -- ... .... ....

--

fll/T

Chapter to: Implementation
''&lt;ming Plan

Public Input survey respondents were mixed in their responses regarding Marijuana Facilities. Almost an equal number of respondents thought
the three existing, approved grow, processing and provisioning centers were "too many" or "just right." An equal number of respondents (45%)
were in support of recreational marijuana in 2019 and still believe it should be permitted in the City of Southfield vs. those who were NOT in
support of recreational marijuana in 2019 and still do not believe it should be permitted in the City of Southfield.
Fencing

The current Zoning Ordinance requires a 25 foot side yard setback for structures located within the residential districts. Strict interpretation of
this requirement prohibits owners who are located on corner lots from installing a side yard fence any closer than 25 feet from their property
line. Subsequently, homeowners lose a significant portion of their yards that could be fenced for privacy. Thus, the City should review these
provisions for exceptions for fencing on corner lots.
Site Plan Approvals

Presently, the City Council holds the authority to issue site plan approvals. This arrangement means that applicants have to go through a
minimum of two levels of review (Planning Commission and City Council) to receive site plan approval. In most other municipalities in Michigan,
the Planning Commission is the final approval authority for site plans, with the exception of Planned Unit Developments (PUDs). The
Redevelopment Ready Communities (RRC) program, administered by MEDC, requires that site plans be approved administratively or by the
Planning Commission (depending on the scope of the development) in order for a community to be RRC Certified. Currently, Southfield is
positioned to lose its RRC Certification due to this arrangement, which will downgrade the city from the "Certified" designation to the
"Essentials" designation. This shift would restrict the funding and resources available to Southfield through the MEDC. The City should review
and modify its site plan procedures to be in compliance with the requirements of the RRC "Certified" level.

CERTIFIED EXPECTATIONS
0 Site plans for permitted uses are approved
administratively or by the planning commission .

D Site plans for permitted uses are approved
administratively or by the planning commission.

0 Permitted uses do not require a formal public
hearing (but allow for public comment and other
engagement as deemed necessary).

-285-

�Chapter

10:

Implementation
'':on:ing Plan

Past Zoning Changes Since 2016 Master Plan
For a local unit of government that has adopted a zoning ordinance, a zoning plan for various zoning districts controlling the height, area, bulk,
location, and use of buildings and premises. The zoning plan shall include an explanation of how the land use categories on the future land use
map relate to the districts on the zoning map. Below is a summary of zoning text and map amendments that have been adopted since the last
Master Plan Sustainable Southfield was adopted in June 2016:

2018
PSLUlS-0007

Delete existing Section 5.22-5, Public Art Requirement, and inserting therein a new Section 5.22-5, Public
Art Requirement.
This text amendment specifically addresses providing for the submission of a cash bond by the property
owner in the amount equal to the public art allocation requirement during those times when weather,
delay in fabrication or delivery of artwork impedes timely installation.

PSLU18-0008

1. Gasoline filling station/service station definitions and prohibition of exterior convenience items.
2. Bed &amp; Breakfast uses
3. Parking Standards in the RC Regional Center district.
4. Off-Street Parking Layout

-

.

-

5. Restaurant uses in shopping centers of less than four (4) attached uses.
6. Miscellaneous other amendments

2019
PSLU19-0002

Amending Article 4 General Requirements to add a new Section 5.22-3-1 RUDD Residential Unit Development
Districts and amend Article 5 Single Family Residential Section 5.62-A to add Small Event Venues as a Special Land
Use, and other amendments as needed.

-286-

-

�I'

~

~

--

,.. ,,_

. . . - - - - ,.,- I/IT

,,
Chapter

PZTA19-0001

10:

Implementation
r~cming Plan

To amend the Zoning Ordinance to regulate Sexually Oriented Businesses.
To amend Article 2 Definitions and Article 4 General Requirements, Article 9 Office-Service District, Article
10 ERO/ERO-M Education Research-Office District/Education Research-Office - Limited District, Article 18
General Business District, Article 19 I-L Light Industrial District, and Article 20 I-1 Industrial District, and
other amendments as needed. These text amendments specifically address adding regulations for Medical
Marihuana Facilities in the City and amending the Northland Overlay Development District regulations to
allow for Medical Marihuana Facilities.

2020
Council-initiated Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to amend Title V, Zoning and Planning, Chapter 45,
Zoning, of the Code of the City of Southfield by amending Section 5.179 of Article 19 Light Industrial Districts to
allow any Medical Marihuana Facility previously approved by City Council prior to October 13, 2019, be allowed
to apply for a Special Land Use and Site Plan under Article 19, the Medical Marihuana Facilities and Licensing Act
(MM FLA).

"'

PZTA20-0002

Amend Section 5.62-A of Article 5 Single Family Residential Districts to allow for additional uses in the Single
Family District, and to amend Section 5.53(3) Historic Districts - Bed and Breakfast of Article 4 General
Provisions to remove stipulations regarding B&amp;B locations

PZTA20-0003

Amending various Articles and Sections of the Zoning Ordinance related to Mobile MRI (Magnetic Resonance
Imaging) Units

2021
PZTA21-0001

PZTA21-0002
PZTA21-0003

This text amendment specifically addresses updating the Woodland and Tree Protection Ordinance, updating
the Wetland and Watercourse Protection Ordinance, adding provisions related to Small Box Retail uses, and
adding provisions for Small Cell Facilities to the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance
This text amendment specifically addresses correcting a clerical error regarding where Medical Marihuana
Facilities are permitted per ODD District
This text amendment specifically addresses modifying the definition of "Nonconforming Use" in Article 2, and
amending Article 4 Section 5.23 to clarify Non-conforming uses; amending Article 4 Section 5.22-4 Sign and
Commercial Building Lighting to add "Commercial Building" to the Section title, adding a New Section 5.22-4-1
-287-

�Chapter

10:

Implementation
,, ,ming Plan

Exterior Lighting and Glare to provide standards and protections for adjacent properties from glare, and revising
Article 4 Section 5.31 (15) to sufficiently illuminate areas for security and safety
This text amendment specifically addresses adding definitions, including but not limited to: Indoor Recreation
Centers, Dark Store and Ghost Restaurants, Personal Services and Health/Fitness Clubs, Automobile and Truck
Rental, Dog Kennels and Pet Daycare; amending Parking Standards for Open Concept Hair and Nail Salons, and
Salon Suites; removing distance requires and amending wall requirements for certain restaurants; allowing Data
Centers in I-L Light Industrial and I-1 Industrial zones; allowing Religious Facilities as Places of Assembly; allowing
Medical and General Office uses as Permitted uses in I-1 Industrial zones

-288-

-

�I

-~-

-

�AJJpcndiccs: Sustainahlc Southfield 2.0
Table of Contents

Appendices: Sustainable Southfield 2.0
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Works Cited/Sources

Note: Appendices B-F are located in a separate document due to their size. This document is available in all digital and physical
locations wherever Sustainable Southfield 2.0 is available.

Appendix B: MPEA of 2008
Appendix C: Resolutions and Letters
Appendix D: 2016 Implementation Table
Appendix E: Complete Public Engagement Summary/Public Input
Appendix F: John Grace Revitalization Plan

-290-

-

�1111

II[

,,._ ,,. -

-

,.,. 1/11/r ,,, ,,, ~
Appendix A: \,Vorks Cited
:Endnotes

Appendix A: Works Cited
Endnotes
Chapters 1-10
1

Southfield Historical Society, https.//southfieldhistoricalsociety.wordpress.com/
SEMCOG, http~//semcob org/population-estimates
3
SEMCOG, 2019 Population estimates
https //semcog org/desktopmodules/SEMCOG.Publications/GetFile.ashx?filename=PopulationAndHouseholdEstimatesForSoutheastMichiganOctober2019.pdf
4
AARP 2015 May 4 Issue https//press.aarp.org/2015 -05-04-lnside-the-May-lssue-of-AARP-Bulletin
5
2000 and 2010 Census, 2019 ACS https://data.census.gov/cedsci/
6
SEMCOG Community Explorer, https ://maps.semcog.org/CommunityExplorer/
7
SEMCOG Community Explorer, https,//maps.semcog.org/CommunityExplorer/
8
MDHHS 2020 Health Equity Report https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdhhs/2020 PA653 -Health Equity Report Full 731810 7.pdf
9
The Guardian, April 8 2020 httpsj/www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/08/amsterdam -doughnut-model-mend-post-coronavirus-economy
10
Virginia Department of Health nttps ://www.vdh.virginia.gov/healthy-communities/local-communities/
11
PPS, 2021 nttps_//www.pps.org/article/six-trends-in -placemaking-active-transportation-from -walk-bike-places-2021
12
Gensler, April 2021 https://www.gensler.com/blog/5-principles-for-retail -center-repositioning
13
Missing Middle Housing ht cps //missingmiddlehousing.com/
14
Planetizen, September 2021 https://www.planetizen.com/news/2021/09/114707-end -single-family-zoning-california
15
HUD, 2008 https)/www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/adu.pdf
16
Numerah, 2021 h t i ~ nerah com/the -future -of-tourism/
17
Crains Detroit, October 2021 Issue https ://www.crainsdetroit.com/this-week-issue/archives?year=2021
18
Trading Economics www.Tradmglconomics.com
19
McKinsey, 2021 https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/gone-for-now-or-gone-for-good -how-to -playthe new talent -game and win back workers
20
American Planning Association, 2020
https.//www.planning.org/publications/document/9228382/#:~:text=APA%20Foresight%20identifies%20emerging%20trends.identified%20as%20relevant%20
to%20planning.
21
Oakland County, 2016 https://www.oakgov.com/health/Documents/CHA web.pdf
22
Oakland County, 2021 https://www.oakgov.com/advantageoakland/resources/Documents/Maps/dev map bra rev.pdf
23
MDHHS https.//www.m1chigan.gov/mdhhs/inside-mdhhs/statisticsreports
24
MDHHS https://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/inside-mdhhs/statisticsreports
25
USDA https ://www.ers.usda .gov/data-products/food -access-research -atlas/go-to -the-atlas/
2

-291-

�Appendix A: \\ orks Cited
Endnotes
1

26

American Heart Association, 2020 https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/fitness/fitness-basics/aha -recs-for-physical -activity-in-adults
Moneygeek, 2022 ,ttps.//www.:noneygeek.com/living/best-cities-black-women/
28
MDHHS, 2020 https.//www.michigan.gov/documents/mdhhs/2020 PA653 -Health Equity Report Full 731810 7.pdf
29
Bloomberg, 2013 11 ~tps//www.bloomberg.com/news/a rticles/2013 -03-05/the-great-sen ior-sell -off-cou Id-ca use-the -next-housing-crisis
30
Washington Post, April 15 2011 https://www.washingtonpost.com/realestate/shaping-the-city-seeking-a-new-template -for -truly-smartgrowth/2011/04/ /AFQShSPE story.html
31
MEDC, September 2019 https://www.miplace.org/4a72b8/globalassets/documents/shpo/programs-and -services/michigan-modern/plumbrooke-estatest ,s _or_c district southfleld oakland -county nps-scan.pdf
32
MEDC, September 2019 tittps ://www.miplace.org/4a72b8/globalassets/documents/shpo/programs-and -services/michigan -modern/plumbrooke-estateshr tone d strict southfleld oakland -county nps-scan.pdf
33
MEDC, January 2020 https://www.miplace.org/4a72c1/globalassets/documents/shpo/programs-and -services/michigan -modern/northlandprden '._ somhfreld oakland county nps -scan .pdf
34
State of Michigan, November 20 2021 https ://www.michigan.gov// med 1~/Pro 1~ct_LN ebs1tes/mshd 3/HousrngSu rveyand InterviewFindi ngsReport 111021.pdf?rev=048d8203c l 724e27894039ed5a4b4326
35
Pew Research, July 19 2017 https ://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017 /07 /19/more -u-s-households-are-renting -than -at-any-point -in-SO -years/
36
AXA, March 29 2017 https.//www.axa.eo.uk/landlord -insurance/generation-rent-habits-perceptions/
37
Mlive, 2021 http~J/www.mlive.com/public-interest/2022/0l/competition-was-steep -and-prices-soared -in-2021-michigans-2022-housing-market-will -likelybe the same html
38
Bridge Michigan, July 27 2021 https://www.bridgemi.com/business-watch/5 -things -know-about-buying-house-michigan -real -estate-crisis
39
SNHC https./h,nhc org/ourproperties/
40
Granicus .b.!.!.Qij 'granicus.com/blog/are-short-term -vacation-rentals-contributing-to-the-housing-crisis/
41
State of Michigan, 2021 _b!!J;&gt; //www legislature.mi.gov/(S(p314kqrwilyrw2xaludolt3u))/mileg.aspx?page=GetObject&amp;objectname=2021 -HB-4722
42
State of Michigan, October 14 2021 t ttps ://www.michigan.gov/whitmer/0.9309,7 -387-90499 90640-570501-00 html# text M1ch1gan%20has%20more%20than%202.residents%20are%2050%20and%20older
43
City of Huntington Woods, 2020 https://cms9files.revize.com/huntingtonmi/Government/Senior%20Advisory%20Committee/UM -Senior-Amenities-and Ufestyle Analysis pdf
44
Missing Middle Housing 7ltps://mrssingmiddlehousing.com/
45
HUD, 2008 https.//www huduser gov/portal/publications/adu.pdf
46
PBS Newshour, November 23 2019 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-minneapolis-became-the -first-to-end -single -family-zoning
47
Planetizen, September 2021 https.//www.planetizen.com/news/2021/09/114735 -bend first -comply-oregons-statewide-upzoni11gl w11 t =&gt;x1 Or ron °· ,2_Qmade~u20history%20in%202019,comply%20with%20that%20historic%201egislation .
48
Planetizen, July 2 2016 hilP .//www.planetizen .com/node/87154/20-minute-neighborhoods -detroit
49
Bloomberg, January 9 2017 1ttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017 -01-09/buffalo -is-the -first -to-abandon -minimum-parking -requirementsc1tyw1de
50
Dahlen Silva &amp; David Foldes &amp; Csaba Csiszar, 2021 'Htps ://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3008 -d514009.html
51
Henao, Alejandro; Marshall, Wesley E., 2019 hnps./,'conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/212145
52
FHMA, May 7 2021 LiLL//www.freddremac.com/research/insight/20210507 hou sing supply.page

27

-292-

-

�-

1!!!11

f//111

,.,

..

. , , ,,,.

Appendix A: Works Cited
Endnotes

53

MSHDA, November 10 2021 https://www.michigan.gov/mshda/-/media/Project/Websites/mshda/developers/housingplan/HousingSurveya nd InterviewFindi ngsReport 111021. pdf?rev=53b95b669f354be9b5 92fla3ca8bd 18e&amp;hash=3205 D07 AB2E9BD58C0249E 159Al E75A 1
54
City of Southfield, June 2019 https://www.cityofsouthfield.com/sites/default/files/2019 -06/southfield ed profile 1-2016 2.pdf
55
Oakland County, 2022 https://www.oakgov.com/mgtbud/fiscal/Documents/OaklandCounty EconomicOutlookSummary 2022 -2024.pdf
56
Oakland Schools, 2021 https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1650640805/oaklandk12mius/fauioivqn9qtlc81sqoy/districtservicereport 202021 digital lpdt
57
Freep, June 7 2021 ~ tps .//www.freep.com/story/money/business/2021/06/07 /michigan -employers-returning-jobs-offices/7527295002/
58
USA Today, November 17 2021 https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2021/11/17 /jobs -career-changes -covid -linkedin -poll/6266902001/?gnt-cfr=l
59
Smart Growth America https.//smartgrowthamerica.org/program/national -complete-streets-coalition/publications/what -are -complete-streets/
60
SEMCOG http&lt; .//semc..og org/land
61
City of Southfield, October 28 2012 https://www.cityofsouthfield.com/sites/default/files/inline -files/lid -manual-10 28-12 new.pdf
62
SEMCOG https .//semco 5 org/land
63
Southfield Public School Districts https://www.southfieldkl2.org/departments/buildings-and-grounds/stormwater-management-program/
64
City of Southfield, August 2015 https://www.cityofsouthfield.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/rain garden -flyer-new.pdf
65
Curbed, June 21 2018 https.//archive.curbed.com/2018/6/21/17484062/center-for-active-design-civic-guidelines
66
City of Southfield, 2017 https ://www.cityofsouthfield.com/news/city-southfield -adopts-green -infras tructu re -or di na nces -and-pledges-ongoi ng-su pport-paris
67
City of Southfield, July 2019 https://www.cityofsouthfield.com/sites/default/files/2019-07 /guidelines.pdf
68
SEMCOG https //semcog org/waterinfrastructure
69
Electric Vehicle Transportation Center, May 2017 http://fsec.ucf.edu/en/publications/pdf/FSEC-CR-2065-17 .pdf
7
Car and Driver, September 2021 https//www.magzter.com/US/Hearst-magazines/Car-and-Driver/Automotive/722326
71
lnvestopedia, May 2014 https//www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/052014/how -googles-selfdriving-car-will -change-everything.asp
72
Tharifi and Yamagata, December 1 2015
tiJJP-sJ/ww'!f.. re carchgate net/publication/282834336 Roof ponds as passive heating and cooling systems A systematic review
73
The Atlantic, December 2015 httpsJ/www theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/12/bioreceptive -buildings/418620/
74
Kleinschroth and Kowarik, August 3 2020 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fee.2230
75
University of Michigan Urban Lab hrtps.//www.urbanlab.umich.edu/project/real -time-watershed -control/
76
Mlive, October 2020 https.//www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2020/10/lawsuit-over-ann-arbor-utility-rates-ignites-council -debate-about-funding-fortrees hrml
77
Congress for New urbanism https://www.cnu .org/node/538
78
City of Southfield httpsJ/www.cityofsouthfield.com/Government/CityDepartments/AC/CareerCenter/Partners/tabid/425/Default.aspx

°

-293-

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010178">
                <text>Southfield_Comprehensive-Master-Plan_2022</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010179">
                <text>City of Southfield Planning Department, City of Southfield, Oakland County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010180">
                <text>2022-12-22</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010181">
                <text>Sustainable Southfield 2.0 Comprehensive Master Plan 2023-2028</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010182">
                <text>The Sustainable Southfield 2.0 Comprehensive Master Plan 2023-2028 was prepared by the City of Southfield Planning Department with the assistance of McKenna and was approved on December 22, 2022.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010183">
                <text>McKenna (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010184">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010185">
                <text>Southfield (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010186">
                <text>Oakland County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010187">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010189">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010190">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010191">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010192">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038444">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54823" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59093">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/c5b564f1cbf5b7dfcd24b2e350b8b2b9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f79dff98943d86feaa72cd6c237a6e88</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010239">
                    <text>-,

....

I

I

,,~'
j

lI

I

j

1

i

I

i

-·
i

, I
l
A

,t
j

i

1'

.
J
f •

/

;

I

i

/
''

'

�.
CITY OF ST. JOSEPH
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
August, 1976
AMENDED
- January,

1977 -

PREPARED BY
CITY OF ST. JOSEPH PLANNING COMMISSION
James Heathcote, Chairman

Ray Freridge, Member

Neil Berndt, Vice Chairman

Richard Lambrecht, Member

Bu.rton Baker, Member

Donald McGrath, Member

John Fetters, Member

James Mason, Member
Gratten Nowlen, Member

A note of appreciation to
Carl Conklin, Director of Building &amp; Inspection
Gerald Heppler, City Manager
Richard Kiesel, Assistant City Manager

Technical Assistance Provided By
Southwestern Michigan Regional Planning Commission
Thomas Sinn, Past Executive Director
John Kowalski, Senior Planner
James Muldoon, Senior Planner
S.B.D. Marks, Graphics
Lana A. Veine, Secretary

�--

I

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH PLANNING COMMISSION
ADOPTION RESOLUTION
ST. JOSEPH MASTER PLAN

WHEREAS,

the Municipal Planning Act, Act 285, P~A. 1931, states that
planning commissions shall make and adopt a master plan for the
ur ose of encoura in and guiding orderly and efficient future
growt an development o
e c1

WHEREAS,

in accordance with Act 285, P.A. 1931, as amended, notice of a
public hearing has been duly published and on August 5th ;1976,
the public hearing was held at the St. Joseph City Hall for the
purpose of making public explanation of the £_reposed master plan
and downtown development plan and receiving public comments and
·recommendations regarding the plan; and

WHEREAS,

the St. Joseph Planning Commission has given due consideration to
the public comments presented at the hearing:

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the St. Joseph Planning Commission hereby
approves and adopts the St. Joseph Master Plan and Downtown
Development Plan dated
August, 1976, as requ1rea by the-aforementioned state legislative act to encourage and guide future
growth and development of the city in an orderly manner.
RESOLVED ON THIS
Second
DAY OF September, 1976, AT A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE ST. JOSEPH PLANNING COMMISSION ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING VOTES OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS:
Yes
Burton Baker
Neil Berndt
John Fetters
Ray Freridge
-Richard Lambrecht
Donald McGrath
James Mason
Gratten Nowlen
James Heathcote

No

Absent

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X

J~s Heathcote, Planning Commission Chairman

L

&amp;

_.--t?4,1 /

·&gt; f
c
~(j_;{/L;..;/
(__/

· Carl ConkYin, Recordinq Secretary

I

�I

•

CITY OF ST. JOSEPH PLANNING COMMISSION
AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
'.

ST. JOSEPH MASTER PLAN

WHEREAS,

the Municipal Planning Act, Act 285, P.A. 1931, states that planning commissions shall make and adopt a master plan for the purpose
of encouraging and guiding orderly and efficient future growth and
development of the city; and

WHEREAS,

in accordance with Act 285, P.A. 1931, as amended, notice of a
public hearing has been duly published and on January 6, 1977, the
public hearing v1as held at the St. Joseph City Hall for the purpose
of making public explanation of the proposed rev1s1ons to the master
plan as adopted on September 2, 1976 and for receiving public comments
and recommendations regarding the plan; and

WHEREAS,

the St. Joseph Planning Commission has given due consideration to
the public comments presented at the hearing:

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the St. Joseph Planning Commission hereby
approves and adopts the revisions to the St. Joseph Master Plan
dated January, 1977, as required by the aforementioned state
legislative act to encourage and guide future growth and development
of the city in an orderly manner.
RESOLVED ON THIS SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY, 1977, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ST. JOSEPH PLANNING COMMISSION ACCORDING TO THE FOLLmHNG VOTES OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS:

Yes
Burton Baker
Neil Berndt
John Fetters
Ray Freridge
Richard Lambrecht
Donald McGrath
James Mason
Gratten Nowlen
James Heathcote

Absent

No

X
X

X
X
V

I\

X
X
X
X

Jame~Heathcote,
Planning Commission Chairman
r·

__.

/4P/-~ £:1iL:·"-.

l

-~

-~

:,'..,L~ /

-

L-::___ _ _ _ _ _ __

Carl Conklin, Recording Secretary

�CONTENTS
SECTION I

. POPULATION

SECTION I I

LAND USE

SECTION III
SECTION IV .

. HOUSING

....

SECTION V
SECTION VI

....

. . • ECONOMIC PROFILE

'

...

.
. . ..

PARKS AND RECREATION

... .

SECTION VI I

. . • . . PUBLIC FACILITIES AND UTILITIES
. • . . TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ANALYSIS

SECTION VII I .

. RECOMMENDATIONS
Maps

Page

..

Neighborhood Analysis Areas
Existing Land Use · . . . .

. . . .

.. ..
..

Water Distribution System

II-5

...

VI-3

Sanitary &amp;Storm Sewer System
1972 Traffic Flow

VI-5

.•

. VII-4

...

1972 Street Network

... .

Existing Network of Streets Serving Principal Traffic Flow . .

. . .

Proposed Street Cl ass i.fi cation System

.. .. ... . . .. .
. . . . . . . . .
;•
...
. . . .. .

Tables, Charts, and Graphs
Sex by :Age (1970)

..... . .

.

.......

. VII- 11'
. VII I-4

VIII-12

I-2

Percent Change in Total Population (1960-1970)

St. Joseph, Michigan Population

VII-9

Page

...... ..

1973-74 Household Characteristics for St. Joseph

VII-6

. VII-7

Existing and Committed Street System Improvements for the Year 2000
Dial-A-Ride Zones
...
Future Land Use Plan .

I-8

I-2

..

.

.

I-4
I-7

�I

CHARTS and GRAPHS

1973-74 Household Characteristics for St. Joseph by Neighborhoods
Existing Land Use . . . . . . . .

I-9

.....

II-4

Comparative Land Use Changes for St. Joseph

.. ..

1940-70 Housing Trend for St. Joseph

. . III-3

Owner-Rental Occupied and Single and Multi-Family Housing Unit
Distribution for St. Joseph and Neighborhoods in 1974 . .

. . . . .

Housing Unit Transiency and Vacancy Rates for St. Joseph and
Neighborhoods in 1974 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IV-2

1970 Economic Base Indicators for St. Joseph

IV-6

. . . . .

1950-60-70 Employment by Occupation for St. Joseph

IV-10

1958-72 Manufacturing Employment and Value Added for St. Joseph .
1954-72 Selected Services Establishments and Total Receipts for
St. Joseph . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IV-11

. . . .

Inventory of Park and Recreational Facilities for St. Joseph 1975.
Past Trends and Projected Demands for St. Joseph Water Treatment Plant
Inter-Zone Trips . . . . .
DART - O&amp;D Trip Patterns

IV-7
IV-8

1958-72 Retail Payroll, Sales, and Establishments for St. Joseph

..

III-4
III-6

1963-72 Area Industrial Interrelationship for St. Joseph

1950-60-70 Employment by Industry for St. Joseph

II-9

IV-12
V-3
VI-2

. VII-12

. VII-13

�.
NT R O DUC T I ON
-I --- ------Every community has its own unique development parameters.

The City of

St. Joseph is located in the core of the Twin Cities urban area.

It and

Benton Harbor were the original centers for urban development in the area,
and therefore contained the majority of the area's older housing units and
neighborhoods.

The city has a small potential for new development (dis-

counting redevelopment) because of its minimal amount of vacant land.
St. Joseph is the are~ •s center for industrial employment and one of the
area's major centers for retail sales ,
The purpose of this report is to present a realistic comprehensive plan and
the information that led·~ to that plan for the City of St. Joseph.

Urban

planning is a concept which refers to the continuous advisory process of
guiding land development in accordance with established policies and toward
predetermined goals.
environment.

It represents continuous efforts to shape the physical

Its ultimate aim or objective is the welfare-of -those who live

and will live in the community insofar. as control of the physical environment
will contribute to this end.
The planning process must be comprehensive.

It should consider all major

physical elements that affect both public and private property.

Special

emphasis within the plan will be placed upon the land use, housing and
transportation elements of the report because they encompass critical issues
the city is presently fac i ng.

�I.

POPULATION

Population growth, characteristics and distribution are of critical importance
t

in land use planning and zoning.

Not only do these factors have an effect on

planning and zoning, but planning and zoning, in turn, have effects on the
future population of a given area.
The city's future housing market will depend, to a large extent, upon the
expected number and size of families, while future t_rf:_n_d_s _a_nd age composition
will play the major role in determining school and park needs, special housing

- ------- -

-

-

-

facilities and labor force p~rticipation.
----- --

-- -~-

-- - -- -- - -

-

--

--

-

----

Overall, population changes

influence a need and potential for expansion of commercial and industrial
development and the demand for public services and facilities.

CITY-WIDE DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
Within the past 24 years, the City of St. Joseph has experienced approximately
an 11% increase in population.

Between 1950 and 1960 there was a 5% increase

in the city's population (adjusting for annexation) compared to a -6% population
decrease from 1960-1970.

The U.S. Bureau of Census population estimates

establish the city's population at 11,262 as of July l, 1973, indicating an
average yearly population growth rate of approximately 0.6% between 1970 and
1973.

The 1973 and 1974 R. L. Polk City Directory surveys show a 0.6% popu-

lation increase between the surveys.
As indicated in Graph I-A, the age distribution of the city's 1970 population

_

is disproportionately hig~ in the male and female 50-70+ age group and low
---

----

-

-

--

-

.

in the male and female 0-14 and 25-39 age groups when compared with age break-

----------

downs for the county and the state.

I-1

Also illustrated in Graph I-A is the

�bl' dPll 1 - A

SEX BY AGE (1970 )

PERCENT CHANGE IN TOTAL
POPULATION (1960 - 1970)

ST. JOSEPH CI T Y

(X 100)
MALE
98765432

FEMA L E
1234 5 6789

1

460

----252
302
324
350
355
300
239

-

·•·

?98

--

341

-~- •.

·- ·- ·-· --~-

--

..

- 231
-

392
412
4?7
340

528

?42

-

460 _ - - - 385
322

.

-.

479
529

10 -

+

0

10

20

40

30

50

••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11'54 _;
111111 10 .2

65-69
60 - 64

11 11 u• 12.4
11111111111 70.6

- ■■■ ■ 111111111 73_5
1111 7. 6

4.6

Ill

26. 7 111111111111111
45 ,Q 11111111••··••1••··~ ·••1
37_1 1111 • 11111111 • 1111111
lt ■ Ull l 0. l

1
···············••
• 111111111 •_11 21. 9

10- )4

382
3B4

--

20

15- 19

1Z!l

--

30

70- 74

30-34
75-29
20- 74

313

.

40

75+

35-J?

-·

50

55- 59
50-54
_4 5-59
40-44

,......._. -

33 2
407

AGE

•••• 33 _9

Q. . . . . . . ,

11

17 _4 11• ■■ •1111

5-9

34.3 ••·················

BERRIEN COUNTY
(X IO00)

MALE
98765432

2 , 239

FEMALE

I 2 3

4

5

6 7 8 9

J

759

AGE

2 .330
2.6 75

40

30

20

10 -

4 'i95

•H1 ■.!_1_•_1_1-'-1t;"'"·""&lt;_ ____
• ■■■ 1•••11• ' I . I

_

• 1111 • 11 u 11 21.9

45_4q

255]~:~~~~= ~~~~iiii:1;
4~
495
--==== ~4=·tf4l3!5~
0~6{7: : : ~ ~~
.71 8

5 549

5 157

50

4.0 11

- - - - - - - --

-

-

- ,1-•_11111

40-44

5 345

40

··················••37_4

50-54

___ 5 , l 5G

4.437

30

20

10

• 2. 7

3 9?9

4 354

+

0

- -- -- - ------1

' 1"17

4 ,4) 7

50

75+
70-74
65- 69

_________ I

17 . 91111111111

30-34

10.s 11111 •

20-?4

-2§.L

_ 8. '@___

8,fi.!2.____ __ _

7 .639

15-1 9

JLl.12

10- 14

8 .331

5-9
0-4

7 . 36 5

6

■■ •1111111111 71.

25-29

6 .452

7.3 16 ------- _ · - - - -

35-39

lI 6

2. 5

I

_ ___ ________,_•··············~•-■-■~!.'!..!L.l_
_•_•_•_•_
•_
■■~-•-■...■ 1111113 s . e

__________ __ _._._._.._._._._._17_._7______
I 2.1

14 . S

1111111•

20

10 -

MICHIGAN STATE

(X 100,000)
MAL E
9 87 65 4321

701 328
257 814
759 354
230 493
?39 490
293,503
328 .837
436 4?0
498 844
471, 266
4JQ_.QQ,

FEMALE
23456

7

209 .925
246,220
27 1 .407
268.G96
243 579
749.275
300 .095
373 907
436 .204
430 42 1
452 , 552
194. )67

89

A GE

50

40

30

+

0

10

20

30

40

50

75+

••••••••••••••••••••••• 40.9

70-74
li5-69
60-64
55-59
50-51\

....... 10. 3
111 5. 0
111111111 14. 8

.......... 16. 6

14.7

........

11111111

!

3 .8

---

9 .3 111111
............... 25.3

,•..........................
- - - - - -- --- --- -----

20-24
15- l &lt;J

----------···························
••••••••••••••1111 J l . 7 .

10- 14

1111 S. 1

5-9

11 Q.... ......

0-4
L?

-- ---- 20. 0
-- - 14. 7
11
111111111111

45-49
40- 44
35-39
30 -34
25 - 79

1970

~- -

_.

57. 7

1111

Ill

~4. 7

�fact that the aforementioned relatively disproportionate concentration of
age groups within the city were initiated or have been reinforced by age
group shifts occurring between the 1960 and 1970 census counts.

The city's

50-70+ age group increased 20.4% between 1960 and 1970 as compared to Berrien

------- - ---

County's 16.9% increase and the State of Michigan's 18.2% i~~rease ~ The
.

city's 0-14 and 25-39 age group population decreased significantly between
1960 and 1970, a -27.5% and a -27.6% respectively, compared to nominal
increases in the same age groups for the same time period for the county and
state.

•

This data indicates that in comparing St. Joseph's demographic trends

with the state's and county's, it is evident that the city has become a
community with a relatively abnormal age distribution of its populace.
Graph I-Bis a graphic portrayal of a number of household characteristics and
their percentage change between 1973 and 1974 for the City of St. Joseph as
provided by the R. L. Polk Profiles of Change surveys." The shaded areas of
the bar graphs indicate the range of the national average for that particular
household characterist~c.

As indicated, the percentage of total households

with children, and percentage female headed households with children, and
percentage rental households, are below the national average range; while
the percent of one person housenolds is above the national average range.
It should be qualified that the household data in Graph 1-B is only available
for changes occurring between 1973 and 1974, thereby reflecting only a one
year trend.

The percentage change portion of the graph should also be

viewed in light of the 4% increase in total number of households for the
city.

An increase in a household subcategory less than 4% would therefore

signify-:-a·· proportional decrease in that subcategory.

Of the total household

subcategories, only female headed households with children, one person house1-3

e

�-

Graph I-B

1973-74 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS FOR ST. JOSEPH

3_,___9

100

00%

80
_ _,...._.._,%

1974
Characteristics

~ National

-

60

40

I

Average
Range

I
!::.

I

I

30.3%

I___ _I 3L6%

I

I 32 .1%

20

, 8%

,-----,,--

O _._____C._u_r_r_en_t._______.__p_e_r..:...c_en_t..____P._e_r_c_e_n.__t____,'-pe_r_;_c_e_JnLt-'--__,LP-er_c_e_n,Lt____JP'-e_r_ce_n_tL.-----P1-e_r_c_e-nt..,__
Households
One-Person
Households
Female Heads
Renters
Households Husband/Wife
Households
w/Children
w/Children
Households w/5 or more Households
Households
. Persons

LY,

1973-74
?ercent Change

r----.-LLi

t

f

f

j

j

J%

11.2%

4%
•

,· o 7p

I

I

j

f

1

4.3%

1

'%

j

�holds, and rental households have experienced relative increases.

While the

relative proportion of households with children, households with 5 or more
persons, and husband/wife households decreased.

These shifts within house-

hold subcategories represent a one year trend towards a change in the character
of the city's households.
As previously stated, the city's population stratification has a comparatively
high concentration of residents in the upper age brackets.

This stratifi-

cation causes the percentage of females in the childbearing age (15-45) to be
proportionately less than in the county or state thereby limiting the future
r1et increase in city residents through natural incr2ases (birth5).
At present, the City of St. Joseph has a minimal quantity of residentially
developable land within its boundaries, and has also expressed a desire to
curtail the subdivision of its existing housing stock.

These factors will

assumedly preclude any future significant increase in the city's housing
supply through subdivision of existing housing stock or new construction on
presently vacant lots.
As indicated in Graph I-B, between 1973 and 1974, the city experienced an
i-ncrease in one person households and a proportional decrease in households
with children.

If these trends were to continue, the city's resident per

household ratio would:decrease.

This trend of decreasing residents per

household ratio and the city's assumed static housing stock would presumably
preclude future expansion of 4ts population via migration.
Based on the previously established premises that the city's future
population natural increase and migration rates will be minimal, we project
that the city's population has peaked as of 1974 and that new additions to
,

I

•

�the city via natural increase {births) and in-migration will merely offset natural decreases {deathsr and out-migration to the year 2000 as
indicated in Table I-C.
'

These projections are based upon the assumption

of there being no major redevelopment or clearance projects within the city
during this time period.

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS BY NEIGHBORHOODS
The 1973-74 R. L. Polk surveys {Table I-D) indicate a concentration of one
person households in neighborhoods 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 13, with all but
neighborhood 13 being in the older portion of the city

(Map I-E). This
is a significant concentration relative not only to St. Joseph, but for the
entire Twin Cities area.
The distribution of St. Joseph's households with children is significant in
that the city does not have any neighborhoods with a concentration of 50% or
more,

while a majority of the St. Joseph Township and Lincoln Township

neighborhoods immediately south of the city limits do have concentrations
of households with children of 50% or more.
The number of female headed households with children within the city is minimal.
However, it should be noted that the major concentration of these families is
within the older portion of the city, neighborhoods 3, 6, and 7.
The distribution of rental housing within the city corresponds closely with
the previously mentioned di stri but ion of one_.: person households.

Both house-

hold characteristics are influenced by the large number of apartment developments in the southern portion of the city and Lake View Towers and Whitcomb
Apartments in downtown St. Joseph.

I-6

�Table I~C ' ,.

ST. JOSEPH, MICHIGAN POPULATION

Trends
1950
Population *10,223

.......
I
......,

Yearly
% Change

Estimates

Projections

1960

1970

1973

1974

1975

2000

*11,755

*11 ,042

*11 ,262

**11,330

***11,330

***11,330

(1)+.5 .

-.6

+.6

+.6

0

*U.S. Bureau of Census
** ~R. L. Polk 1974 Profiles of Change
*** SMRPC Projections
(1) Adjusted for Annexation

J

I -

I

•

0

�--- --- --- ---

---

-

---

)

)

------

- - ---

CITY OF

SAINT JOSEPH
BERRIEN

COUNTY

MICHIGAN

NEJGBORHOOD ANALYSIS AREAS

~l 1t
7!
I,

[.

f

'

ff#)

2

--· ..

._,.

~

. ......

I

;•,I-....::,~
3 .

• r&gt;.rr

'·:

-

,.

- .un

I

,,..

--

.. -

..

I.

~~r:,,·
~ YI&lt;
' -~

~(1·
1/

~ · -1;

I; #;
, /, ( -I/
If ,

,. Jl J; - . J··=•ll[ I
L

~-'=.....

~~
'

~

l ..__JL-f~- ~-1,g.

J[ -,

.,_

1, ~

I•

-cl ~ ~

[~ l [ _ ~

.Ill fl.e..::,

IL-., -Jj;

dl:_;J

11
1,:1;1: ~~ ~,1Flfl~&amp;w
tf
l1 l [ J/~
1

~

~,-- , ~

1

~-~ ' --

1

~

~
(J

~

'

--_J□ c.~.~
•~I
~ I . I I

~I~~

•

I
(X)

- ~!\\

@J

I

'&lt;,

\-

13

t ~: ;,: . '-·

~
"J

q:,
SouthwaetiarnMlchglrtAl9glonalPlarrilgCof. ______
29070.-,,,Slr961 · Sl.~

.... .,. .... c - -..

.,.,- ,c.-- .............

.McnQ&lt;vi49066 · li!leJn)rle6l6/98315?9

=l

l

N

I+

-j

I

�I

Table I-0
1973-74 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS FOR ST. JOSEPH BY NEIGHBORHOODS
/
tlo
~
,,:/'
.ti'
,-r'
e, '.

......
I
\0

~'

~j--,_)
/ v'

•'\)'-•~"

1

3

,/

.1.\'
(/

. 4

,,

i"I)

5

•'

\v~ &gt;
Y' ~

6

1,V

~.., t
')--1

2,

7

. " :f) .

y\i) ;fJ

~'

., . I'

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

177

123

City
,,--~

Current
Households

136

190

281

l

766

218

553

544

291

297

368

Percent
One-Person
Households

26

31

68

100

38

30

27

21

22

13

16

58

24

30

Percent
Households
w/Children

42

36

9

0

27

37

31

35

34

41

41

14

40

32

2

8

4

0

5

7

4

3

2

3

4

l

2

4

Percent
Renter
Households

18

@;

83

0-

b"a

34

25

11

18

9

10

65

40

@

Percent
Households
w/5 or more
Persons

18

10

1

0

10

15

12

13

16

15

13

6

16

12

Percent
Husband/Wife
Households

71

53

19

o

49

56

62

72

73

77

77

38

69

60

Percent
Retired
Heads of
Households

18

27

70

0

38

31

32

29

19

22

23

24

17

31

117

93

67

125

90

94

98

110

120

111

117

112

115

l 00

Percent
Female Heads
\'I/Children
Households

Average
Income
Index
Points

Source:

1974 R. L. PnH

~

�The city's neighborhoods have a comparatively low concentration of large
families (households with 5 or more persons) with its largest concentrations
being in the newer neighborhoods

while the major concentration of the

city's husband/wife households are also located in the city's newer neighborhoods.
These household characteristics indicate significant demographic differences
between the city's blder central neighborhoods and its outer lying newly
developed neighborhoods with the exception of neighborhood 13.

The city's

central neighborhoods tend to all have higher concentrations of rental households, one person households, and female headed households with children
while the city's newer neighborhoods with the exception of 13 tend to have
a relatively higher concentration of husband/wife households, households
with children and households with 5 or more persons.

I-10

,r-...

�SUMMARY

St. Joseph has a comparatively high concentration of residents in the
----------- -

50-70+ age gro~p category and a relatively low concentration of residents
in the 0-19 and 25-39 age groups.

The total city also varies from national

averages in its low composition of households with children, female headed
households with children and rental households and a high composition of
one person households.

However, between 1974 and 1975, the city did experience

a proportional increase in ' households with children, one· person households
and rental households.

The city's older center city neighborhoods tend to

have higher concentrations of rental, one person, and female headed households
with children while its newer suburban neighborhoods tend to have higher
concentrations of husband/wife households and households with children and
with 5 or more persons.
It is projected that the city's total population will remain relatively
constant at its 1975 county of 11,330 residents through the year 2000 .

.
I- ll

�II.

LAND USE

The land use ~urvey and analysis is the most basic of all planning studies
in that it constitutes a complete inventory of the uses of land in the
planning area.

The land use map serves as a basic pictorial representation

of this inventory and analysis.

Any development proposals must take existing

land use into consideration and, for this reason, the map should be constantly
updated as additions and changes to the existing development pattern take
place.

EXISTING LAND USE
The City of St. Joseph contains a gross land area of 2,037.25 acres or
approximately 3.18 square miles.

Of this total, approximately l ,678.5 acres

representing 82.7% of the city, are presently developed.

The remaining

358.7 acres are vacant.
Table II-A indicates land use in acres for St. Joseph by land use category.
Map II-B depicts existing land use patterns in the city.
Residential
Residential land use constitutes the largest single category in the city.
There are 639.3 acres of residential development which comprises 31.4% of
the city's land area.

Seventy-nine and seven tenths (79.7) percent of the

residential land is devoted to single-family use.

Seventy-nine and four

tenths (79.4) percent of the city's residentially developed land is located
in the more recently urbanized southern neighborhoods (8-14).
Commercial
There are 101 .3 acres of commercial land use in the city which comprises 5%
of the city's land area.

Seventy-one and six tenths (71 .6) percent of the
II-1

�■

city's wholesale retail commercial land use is located in the northern
"center city" and its adjacent neighborhoods (1-7)

while 80% of the city's

personal, business, and professional services commercial land use is located
in the city's more recently urbanized southern neighborhoods (8-14).
The city's central business district, (CBD) is a well defined area within
the city's older section where wholesale and retail is the prevalent commercial..r"\ use.

The second major commercial location exists along Niles Avenue in the

southern portion of the city where the major commercial uses are service
oriented.
Industrial
Industrial land use occupies 267 acres in the city, representing 13.1% of
its total land area.

This industrial acreage is located in three major

concentrations within the city.

The lands north of the St. Joseph River,

dominated by Whirlpool Corporation and Auto Specialties Corporation, contain
62.6% of the city's total industrial land use.

The city's industrial park

and adjacent lands south of town contain 19.6% of the city's total industrial
acres.

The third major location of industrial land use in the city is

Industrial Island which contains 10.7% of the city's industrial land use.
Public Quasi-Public

,I

There are 252.5 acres of public and quasi-public (including transportation,
communications, utilities, and recreation) land use in the city, representing
12.4% of the tity's total area.
Unused Space
There are 358.8 acres of unused space in the city, representing 17.6% of the
city's total area.
II-2
=---

-- -

,..,

�Streets and Roads
Street and road right-of-way comprise 418.5 acres of the city's total land
use, representing 20.5% of its total area.

II-3

�•
EXISTING LAND USE*

Table II-A

ST. JOSEPH, MICHIGAN
July, 1975
RES IDEN TI AL
N.A.A.

)t

1,\/,J:~1, l

S.F.

M.F.

T.F.

C:1f-1MERC Il\L

INDUSTRIAL

PUBLIC-QUASI PUBLIC

W.R.

P.B.P.

M.

N.M.

T.C.U.

P. &amp;
O.P .

REC.

U.S.

S.R.

TOTAL

23.00

l. 75

1.00

0.00

0.00

2.25

0.00

0.00

3.25

14.25

52.50 11. 50

109.50

~-•· ~~2

0.75

0.25

0.50

0.00

0.00 155. 00

10.00

5.75

0.00

0.00

2.25 82.00

256.50

,u ~

3

9.25

5.00

0.75

0.50

0.00

4.50

1.00

0.25

0.00

14.50 20.00 28.50

84.25

4

3.00

2.50

3.00

6.50

7.50

0.00

0.50

0.50

12.00

10.00

73.25

5

0.00

0.00

0.00

5.00

0.50

1.00 27.50

25.00

0.00

5.00 68.00

6

24.00

25 . 00

9.50

3.50

4.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

5.50

3.00

3.75 40.00

118. 50

t:{itj/7

15. 25

5.75

1.25

8.50

1.00

10.00

2.50

4.00

0.00

15.50

15.50 15.75

95.00

( r' 'a tr

55.00

13.00

5.00

0.00

3.25

0.00

0.50

0.00

16.50

5.00

5.75 39.50

143.50

9

120. 00

3.00

0.50

0. 00

2.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

16.00

18.00

12.00 34.25

205.75

-!o/, 12111 10

50.00

25.00

6.00

0.00

9.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

30.00

8.00

31. 50

191 . 25

11

81.00

1. 75

0.00

0.00

11. 00

0.00

0.00

0.00

7.00

0.00

5.25

31.00 137 . 00

12

48.00

0.75

0.00

0.50

13.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

17 .00

1.50

7.25

29.50

117. 50

13

48.00

0.15

10 . 50

9.00

5.25

38.00

7.00

1.00

4. 50

0.00 130.00 25.25

279.25

14

32.00

0.50

7.00

0.00

11 . 00

7.25

0.00

0.00

9.50

0.00

509.25 85 .00

45.00

33.50

67.75 218.00

49 .00

36.50

121 . 25

2.21

l.64

10.69

2.40

l. 79

5.95

1,

I',..,
&gt;h
/1/11,..

·· IJ.:.
,.,._i,1

·'(&gt;

'~~11 .l
'"1M.t,

I-It

~l1 · " '

TOTALS

% OF TOTAL
LAND AREA

25 .00

N.A.A.

4 .17

3.32

Neighborhood Analysis Areas

S.F.
T.F.
M.F.

Single-Family
Two-Family
Multi-Family

COMMERCIAL
W.R .
P.B.P.

4.50

6.75

31. 75

16. 50

138.75 ~

87.25

94 . 75 358.75 418.50 2037.25
4.65 17. 61

20.54

100.00

PUBLIC-QUASI PUBLIC
T.C.U.

RESIDENTIAL

1.50 26.25

P. &amp;Q.P.
REC.

Transportation, Communications
and Utilities
Public and Quasi Public
Recreation

U.S.

Unused Space

S.R.

Streets and Roads

Wholesale and Retail
Personal , Business, and
Professional Services

INDUSTRIAL
M.
N.M.

Manufacturing
Non-Manufacturing

-

�J

I

I ~
I

1

i

1

'

i

lI 'I . j

~

I

:c

}

I

w

/
/
/

&gt;-

CJ) z

0

0

-,

&gt;-

.....
- ~

I
I

(.)

z
-&lt;
CJ)

::::&gt;

/.
/ ,

z

0

&lt;(

(.)

(.'.)

z

I

UJ

(.)

CI:
CI:

~

/,
/,

/ ,

/ /
/ /
//,

UJ

co

u

w

,,--.

JI

// /,
//// ,

~L

EJI

~ ti

/
/

f-

LI..

i

_J

en

CD

::)

a.,

::J

(,j)

0

&lt;l'.

z

::)

&lt;l:
_J

_J

&lt;l'.

I-

I()

r(J)

(.9 -

z
-}-en

_J

&lt;l'.

z
w

0

(f)

LL.I

a::

_J

u

&lt;t:

2
2

(f)
::)

a:::
w

0

u

a:::

I-

0

z

0
aj

w

u

0

(f)
::)

::)

a.,

/

(,j)

_J

CD

/

u

~

w

z

.;,

::)

w

.y

"'

X

11-5

I

p

/
/

a.

.

'I J

z

Iifl

I
' ooi

I

j

'

)

I

'

)

J

1 i

I ,

jl
d

ri
jj

,

I

�LAND USE DEFINITIONS
The land use classification in the preceding tabulation and map is based on
the Land Use Classification Manual developed by the Land Classification
t

Advisory Committee of the Detroit Metropolitan Area.
Residential Single-Family; includes all detached buildings designed for or
occupied exclusively by one family.
Residential Two-Family; includes all buildings designed for, or occupied
exclusively by two families living independent of each other.
Residential Multi-Family; includes all dwellings or groups of dwellings on
one plat containing separate living units for three or more families, but
which may have joint services or facilities or both.
Commercial, Wholesale, Retail; includes all buildings and attached land used
for the sale to retailers or sale to the ultimate consumer of goods for direct
consumption.
Commercial, Personal, Business-, and Professional Services; includes all
buildings and attached land used for the provision of personal, business, and
professional services.
Industrial, Manufacturing; includes all buildings and attached land used for
all forms and types of industrial manufacturing.
Industrial, Non-Manufacturing; includes all buildings and attached land used
for industrial and non-manufacturing.
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities; includes terminals and service
facilities for trucking, railroads, airports, bus terminals, etc., water
transportation fa cilities, warehousing, water supply and sanitary sewer
IJ - 6

I

�installations.

However, this category does not include rights-of-way of

streets, roads, and highways which are separately tabulated.

Also, no

attempt was made to separately tabulate rights-of-way for pipelines,
utilities, railroads, etc.
Public and Quasi-Public; includes government, public and private schools,
churches, cemeteries, hospitals, and other non-private or charitable
organization uses, except recreation which is separately classified.
Recreation; includes outdoor public and private recreation; such as parks,
golf courses, ice skating rinks, camps, arenas, swimming pools, etc.
Unused Land; is land that does not appear to presently have any active use.
Streets and Roads; includes all dedicated rights-of-ways for city streets and
roads.

II-7

�LAND USE CHANGES
A comparative analysis of the 1953 Harland Bartholomew and Associates land
use tabulatjon (Table II-C) with those in Table II-A indicates a significant
increase in all listed land use categories except public and quasi-public
and unused lands.

The most dramatic change occurred in the residential two-

family category, a 210% increase, and in the multi-family category, a 186.6%
increase.

It should be noted that the third residential category, residential

single-family, only experienced a comparatively minimal increase (18.7%) in
total land use between 1953 and 1974.

The increase in commercial land use

(186.6%) was substantial, the majority of which, assumably occurring in the
southern portion of the city.

The percentage change in unused space is not

comparatively large, however, the real number decrease of 407.8 acres of
unused space is significant.

II-8

J

�Table II-C

COMPARATIVE LAND USE CHANGES FOR ST. JOSEPH

1953
In Acres

1975
In Acres

Percent Change

429.2

509.3

+ 18.7

Res. Two-Family

27.4

85,()

+210.2

Res. Multi-Family

15. 7

45.0

+186.6

Commercial

38.0

101. 3

+166.6

Industrial

152. 4

267.0

+ 75.2

Recreation

62.0

94.8

+ 52.9

Public &amp;Quasi-Public

122.0

l 21 . 3

-

Streets &amp; Roads

372.2

418.5

+ 12.4

Unused Land

766.6

358.8

- 53.2

Res. Single-Family

Source:

II-9

0.6

Harland Bartholomew &amp;Ass.
1953 Area Plan and
SMRPC 1975 Comprehensive Plan Update

-

�...
LAND USE PROBLEMS
The Existing Land Use Inventory developed as part of this study has provided
insight into' a number of the city's land use problems.

The following is a

listing of a number of St. Joseph's more significant land use problems:
1)

Small 1ots

2)

Mixed land uses

3)

Strip commercial development

4)

Haphazard commercial development

I I - 10

�Small Lots
The small lots that exist in the older portion of St. Joseph (Neighborhoods 1-7)
are common in most older cities.

This "grid" pattern development produces a

number of lots with minimal front yards (33 feet).

Such lots, if they become

vacant, are very unsuitable, because of limited frontage, for residential
sites.

-..,,,,
BROAD

ST.

66

34

"'

28

t

;,,

0,

50

~

.....

.....

"' ;,,...
.....

"'
"'

u

~

~

.,.

~

"'
I

u

rr

"'0:, "'

:::,

,

66'

66

..

EL M

.~·

I

u

ST

10~

~

~
l:;l

~

66

I

"'"'

II-11

...

�Mixed Land Use
A major problem confronting several areas of the city is that of mixed
conflicting ]and uses.

An example of this is the Niles Avenue area between

Myrtle Avenue and Columbia Avenue.
Such areas strongly contribute to deterioration of adjacent residential
neighborhoods, conflicting traffic uses, and the retention of adjacent vacant
land in present undeveloped state.

A second example of mixed conflicting

land uses, is the Silver Beach area, whose potential for development as a
recreational beach front area is hindered by adjacent noncompatible industrial
uses.

MYRTLE

AVE. .

•

-

a..

....
:

11111111

11111111

~

:

::: ::: : :::

BOTHAM

:

······ · ·

AVE

COLUMBIA

AVE.

,

_l_l_LL l_J_l b:;d ___ L &lt;:::. &gt;-I::':t-:::: _ 1 I. I__I·
II - 12

�Strip Commercial Development
Strip commercial development along Niles Avenue
between Petrie Avenue and the city limits is another

PETRIE AVE

prime example of a major development problem that has
occurred within the city.

Such development produces

extensive pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation
problems.

Pedestrian movement between commercial uses

across Niles Avenue is extremely hazardous.

The area's

numerous curb cuts and inappropriate parking lot designs
COLUMBIA

severely limit Niles Avenue's traffic capacity and

AVE .

degrades the quality of the adjacent residential
neighborhoods.
GARD

Langley Avenue between Mohawk Lane and Margaret Place
is an example of a residential street with significant
traffic volumes which is experiencing strip commercial
development pressures.

If strip commercial development

AVE .

HIGHLAND

.·,-:

It . . _~ ~ .-.---..:-.
~~;~~jf

is allowed to continue along Langley Avenue, its
eventual development will be similar to that of Niles
Avenue.

II-13

-

�...
Haphazard Commercial Development
Uncoordinated commercial development is an inefficient use of land which
produces a napid deterioration of property values.
A prime example of haphazard commercial development in St. Joseph is the
11

Southtown area" bounded on the north by the Southtown Medical Clinic, the

south by the Southtown Theaters and the east by Niles Avenue.

This large

commercial tract has been allowed to develop piecemeal with no consideration
given or continuity within the development.
The major defects of this development are:
1.

Uncontrolled access to Niles Avenue via numerous curb cuts.

2.

Incompatibility of architectural design in adjacent buildings.

3.

Poor parking layout.

4.

Poor circulation between establishments.

5.

Wasted space.

The lack of design in this development will needlessly add to the existing
congestion on Niles Avenue and encourage thru-traffic intrusion into adjacent
residential neighborhoods.

The combination of these undesirable effects of

haphazard development will lead to gradual depreciation of the area's property
values as alternatively more desirable commercial sites are developed.

II-14

�SUMMARY

In 1974, the major land use in St. Joseph was residential and single-family
residential was the major residential land use subcategory.

However, during

the past 20 years, the two other residential land use subcategories, twofamily and multi-family, have experienced the most dramatic increases in
land area.
The recent strip and haphazard commercial development that has occurred in
south St. Joseph has had severe overall negative effects upon the city.

II-15

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals
1.

Generally
maintain St. Joseph's present single-family, two-family and
•
multi-family residential mix.

2.

Encourage orderly and logical development within the city.

Objectives
l.

Curtail the recent trend towards conversion of the city's single-family
residential housing into two-family and multi-family units.

2.

Prevent further strip commercial development along the city's thoroughfares.

3.

Develop stringent site plan review regulations and procedures.

II-16

�g

I I I.

HOUSING

Housing is t he heart of the community.

Low quality and instability within a

community's housing stock is extremely detrimental to its overall well being.
The high proportion of elderly residents occupying large houses in the older
portions of St. Joseph provides a potential for housing instability within the
city.

To maintain and improve the quality of the city's present housing stock

it is imperative that housing related changes be closely monitored.

CITY-WIDE HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
In preparation of the City of St. Joseph's 1975 Housing and Community
Development application, a review of the city's Building and Inspection
Department records was made to determine the condition of the city's housing
stock.

This review was supplemented by a windshield survey of the city,

conducted by the City Assessor's Office.

These two surveys became the basis

for estimates of the quality of the city's housing stock.

A '.'substandard

housing unit" for the purpose of the city's 1974 Community Development
application was defined as "any housing unit having one or more major
structural defects or a multitude of minor defects causing the unit to be
unsound for human habitation." The two structural condition surveys conducted

by the city indicated that in the spring of 1975, there were app,oximately 199
substandard housing units in the city representing 4.6% of the city's housing
stock.

Sixty-six and 25/100 (66.25) percent of these substandard housing

units were rental while 33.75% were owner occupied units.
The R. L. Polk Profiles of Change Survey conducted in the summer of 1974
establishes the ci.ty's total housing count at 4,175 units.

The R. L. Polk

Survey monitors four housing characteristics that are critical indicators of
II I - 1

�a city's housing stability.

These housing characteristics are:

1.

owner occupied versus rental occupied

2.

single family versus multiple family

J.

vacancy rates (one and two consecutive yearly canvasses)

4.

transiency rates

Between 1940 and 1960, the city experienced a 62.1% increase in its total
number of housing units.

Expressing this figure in other terms, the city

experienced an 87% increase in the total number of owner occupied and a 27%
increase in the total number of renter occupied housing units.
As indicated in Graph III-A, between 1940 and 1960 the number of owner
occupied housing units in St. Joseph experienced a gradual but constant
increase in total units while the number of rental housing units during the
same time period remained relatively constant.

This 20 year trend was

dramatically reversed between 1960 and 1970 when the total number of owner
occupied housing units in the city declined by 3.6% and the total number of
rental occupied housing units increased by 26%.
Owner Occupied and Single-Family Versus Rental Occupied Multiple-Family
High concentrations of rental and multiple housing units versus owner and
single-family housing units are not an indicator of housing instability
'
unless they are accompanied by high transiency
and vacancy rates.

Of the

c.j_!:J~S _to_t&lt;!_l ~,_}_Z5 _u nits in 1974, 2,839 units were owner occupied and 1,336
were renter occupied, while 3,056 were single-family and l ,119 were multi·----

-

--

family units, as illustrated in Graph III-B.

.

- - - -----

-

These figures indicate that

a majority of St. Joseph's housing stock are single-family and owner occupied
units.

I I I-2

�~

l

Graph III-A
1940-70 HOUSING TREND FOR ST. JOSEPH

4,500

4,000

~~

3,500

3,000
......
......

-

Units

I

w

....
•••

.~ti•••••••••••••••••••••••

2,500

a••
•••
••••••
••
••••••
•••
•••
•

2,000

•

...
...
....·····

/

1,500

'

~r111r11r11111111rrrrr,,,,,,,, 1111111 1111111111 11111111111111111&amp;

,,,,,,,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,,,,

1,000

1940

1950

All Housing Units

A4m±SNi

Occupied Housing Units

r:-:".'.'n't'7\:ll

1960

1970

Owner Occupied Housing Units ..•••••••
Renter Occupied Housing Units

Source:

U.S. Census

1r1111111111

J

�✓

.A.:J
.)

~-:(
~eighborhoods

1

:~

,(}

OWNER-RENTAL OCCUPIED AND SINGLE- ANO MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING UNIT
DISTRIBUTION FOR ST.
IN 1974
J JOSEPW~ ~ , AND NEIGHBORHOODS
.
..-lo

('d

t\ l""

3

4

p

..:c·.. .

·, \._,c -lo ·
'('

,.,,-~ (
V

·,J .i•

'

~

'Y

6

7

.

Graph III-B

\;,.,./,_yk,'0

~

\" . .f
.,,,._,

8

10

9

11

14

13

12

Total
City

%

100

Owner
Occupied

::::::::

•:❖

:::;:

:'.::::-·

: : ~I

60

fl

::::::::
::::::::

.:,:,:,:

•:•:
'•'•

and

j

Single

~:)

~:~:~:~:

!{

.•:-:-:-:
•,·.•,•,

:::::

::::::::
·.·,•···

{if
:::::;:::

:-:&lt;
•,:-

·.::

Family

jfj

{(!
:::::::::
:-:-:-:-:

:;:~:~?
Rental 20
Occupied
and

40

·~~~

i{f:..,. .

MultiFamily 60

_:~t

t{;

-i(\1

80

100
/

Owner Occupied~
Si ngl

'

I

am i l ..v

~

f::::::
:a.:.u.:::=·~

Rental Occupied~
M11l

ti-F::lmily

~,

~ourc:P:

R. I . Pnll&lt;' lQ7 !1.

�Vacancy and Transiency Rates
High vacancy and transiency rates are two prime indicators of housing instability
within a city.

The R. L. Polk 1974 survey reported that there were 230 single

canvass and • 41 two canvass vacant housing units in the city.

"Singel canvass"

vacant housing units are those housing units which were observed vacant in the
1974 survey, while "two canvass 11 vacant housing units are thos e housing units
which were successively observed vacant in the 1973 and 1974 surveys.

This

represents a 4.53% single canvass and a 0.98% two canvass housing vacancy
rate in 1974 (Graph III-C).

Both of these figures compare favorable with a

national average vacancy range of between 2-5% and 1-3% respectively.

Between

R. L. Polk's 1973 and 1974 survey, 28% (Graph III-C) of the city's housing
units experienced a one year change in households (transiency rate).
Housing units "experiencing a change in households" are those housing units
!
I

which were occupied by different residents in the 1974 survey than were
reported in the 1973 survey.

This figure also compares favorable with a 25-35%

national average range of housing units experiencing a one year change of
household.

The city's low vacancy and transiency rates indicate a considerable

degree of stability in the city's overall housing stack.

HOUSING CHARACTERISTIC BY NEIGHBORHOODS
Within the city's 14 neighborhoods, (Map I-E) defined previously in the study,
74% of the city's substandard housing units are located in the city's older
neighborhoods (1-7), with neighborhood 6 accounting for over half of the city's
substandard units.

Neighborhood 8, lying directly south of 6, contains

approximately 20% of the city's reported substandard housing units.

This

indicates a concentration of St. Joseph's reported substandard housing units
in an area directly south ofthe city's central business district.

It should

be noted that these neighborhoods ( 6 &amp;8) also contain the highest relative
concentration of housing units.
ITT

�HOUSING

•

%
15

130

13

110

11

Transiency

.._ I

I
. m

10

Rate

t
l

~

~

~

I]I~

r

9

Vacancy
Rate

~

n

~

7

one and two
can vass

30

3

10

l

1
. rf1
)_

D

I

v,1

5

Transiency
Rate
I

17]

50

l

J

AND NEIGHBORHOODS IN 1974

%
150

90

. ...,_,,

Graph I II-C

UNIT TRANSIENCY AND VACANCY RATES FOR ST. JOSEPH

I

r~

r1~

rm 11~
· 11~
·. rt·

, ):_ , ___ 1 _: :_
6
4
3

I I'

1

7

9

8

12

14

Total
City

Single Canvass Vacancy
Rate ~
I
I

&lt;:~ .. -i::,e·.
~

I

n•
T

\

"',ol !· '"74
7

~

wo Canvass Vacancy
Ra' 1~
1

t'--."'--.l

�Owner Occupied Single-Famil_.Y._Versus Rental Occupied Multi_p.Je-Family
Neighborhoods 11, 12, 4 and 13 have the greatest deviance from the norm in
their comparative concentrations of rental to owner occupied and single to
multiple housing units as indicated in Graph III-B.

Neighborhoods 11 and 12

are made up predominantly of owner occupied single-family housing units
while neighborhoods 4 and 13 are made up predominantly of renta'l occupied
multiple family housing units.

This high concentration of owner occupied

single-family housing units in neighborhoods 11 and 12 is due to the fact
that these are the city's most recently developed suburban residential
neighborhoods.

Neighborhoods 4 and 13 indicated high concentrations of

rental type and multi-family housing units because neighborhood 4's housing
unit count is dominated by Lakeview Apartments and Whitcomb Towers and
neighborhood 13 has a high concentration of relatively new apartment complexes.
Transiency and Vacancy Rates
In the area of household transiency, neighborhoods 4 and 13, with their high
concentration of rental and multiple housing units, have a large number of
housing units which experienced a change of household between 1973 and 1974,
45% and 131% respectively.

Neighborhoods l, 6 and 14 also experienced above

average degrees of transiency between 1973 and 1974 with 34%, 34% and 36%
respectively experiencing a change in household (Graph III-C).

These above

average degrees of transiency noted in neighborhoods l, 4, 6, 13 and 14 indicate
housing instability only if they are accompanied by significant one and two
canvass vacancy rates.
At the time of the survey (1974), neighborhoods 4, 7 and 10 registered abnormally high one year vacancy rates, while neighborhoods 3, 4 and 6 registered
abnormally high rates of consecutively vacant housing units in the 1973 and 1974
surveys.

Neighborhood lO's abnormally high one year vacancy rate cannot be
III-7

�considered a true indicator of housing instability because it is not substaintiated by abnormal rates in any of the four other critical housing
indicators.

This abnormally high one year vacancy rate can most likely be

attributed to erroneous data collection or a freak combination of circumstances
and therefore, for the purpose of this report should be discounted.

III-8

-

�SUMMARY

When compared with the national averages, St. Joseph's toatl housing stock's
transiency .and vacancy (one and two canvass) rates are presently at a normal
percentage and the city's single-family versus multi-family and owner occupied
versus renter occupied distributions appeared to be accpetable for a community
this size.

These facts indicate the city's overall housing picture is one of

normalcy and stability.
As indicated in Graphs III-Band III-C, neighborhoods 4 and 6 both have abnormally high transiency and vacancy (one and two canvass) rates along with
abnormally high concentrations of rental occupied and multi-family housing units.
Neighborhood 3 has abnormally high one and two canvass vacancy rates with
relative normal transiency rates and single-family versus multi-family and
owner occupied versus renter occupied distributions.

This information indicates

a critical potential for housing instability in St. Joseph neighborhoods 4 and
6, and to a lesser degree, neighborhood 3.

III-9

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals
1.

Maintain and improve the city's overall housing quality.

2.

Maintain stability in the city's housing market.

3.

Maintain the city's present housing stocks owner occupied to renter
occupied mix.

Objectives
1.

Maintain a vigorous housing code enforcement program.

2.

Monitor changes in the city's housing stock.

3.

Curtail conversion of owner occupied single-f~n~ly housing units to
renter occupied multi-family housing units.

�y

IV.

ECONOMIC PROFILE

Economic factors are important to a city in that they provide employment and
income to residents of the city, which in turn is the chief means by which a
city such as St. Joseph makes its living.
The objectives of this section are to:
l)

Put St. Joseph into an economic perspective with the county, the
region~ and the state.

2)

Determine what the city's economic base industries are.

3)

Give a brief review and analysis of the city's major industrial
sectors.

ECONOMIC INTERRELATIONSHIP
The following is an attempt to identify the linkage between St. Joseph's
localized economy and the county's, region's and state's.

Table IV-A is a

comparative analysis of how the region1 Berrien County, and St. Joseph
successfully share in Michigan's productive activity, using such standard
measures as value added by manufacturing, wholesale sales, retail sales,
and receipts from services.

By taking cross sectional readings of productive

activity for the state, region, county, and city, and expressing them as a
percentage of the larger parent area, and by taking them for different
periods of time, comparisons can be drawn as to the relative position of
each study area and each line of activity in relation to all the areas in
that system and whether that position is improving, remaining constant, or
deteriorating in time.

*Berrien, Cass, and Van Buren Counties

IV-1

�Table IV-A

1963-72 AREA INDUSTRIAL INTER-RELATIONSHIP FOR ST. JOSEPH

Region
as a percent
of State

Berrien County
as a percent
of Region

St. Joseph
as a percent
of Berrien County

79.6

27.'3
22.5
25.0

Value Added by
Ma11ufacturi ng

1963
1967
1972

2.6
2.7
2.9

77. I

Wholesale
Sales

1963
1967
1972

l.3
1.3
l. l

71. 5
80.4
71.1

15. 6

Retail Sales

1973
1967
1972

2.8
2.8
2.6

70.2
70.7
70.0

10.4

Receipts from
Services

1963
1967
1972

1.9

75.6
71.8
73.6

18 .4
20.7
21.8

79.3

1.8
1.9

Source;

TV-?

6.9

6.0

l 0. 3
7.8

~

U.S. Census

-

�4

In 1960 St. Joseph comprised 7.8% of Berrien County's population.

In 1970,

that percentage had decreased to 6.7%. Therefore, comparative decrease in
St. Joseph's percentage of Berrien County's total productive activity is
expected.
In the area of value added by manufacturing; from 1963 to 1972, the city's,
county's, and the region's share of the state's manufacturing activity
remained relatively constant.

The city contributing 25% of Berrien County's

value added by manufacturing in 1972, while only encompassing 6.7 % of the
county's population in 1970, indicates that a significant proportion of the
city's economic activity is in manufacturing.
Between 1963 and 1972, the city's proportion of Berrien County's total wholesale and retail trade was substantially decreased.

During the same nine year

period, the county and the region remained relatively constant in their
percentage of the state s wholesale and retail trade.
1

Between 1963 and 1972, St. Joseph's proportion of Berrien County's total
selected service receipts had been constantly increasing.

This trend is not

comparative with any similar shifts at the county or regional level .

•

ECONOMIC BASE
The economic base theory conceives the structure of the urban economy as
made up of two broad classes of productive effort:
1)

The basic activity which produces and distributes goods and
services for export to firms and individuals outside of St. Joseph's
economic area.

2)

The service or non-basic activities whose goods and services are
consumed at home within the confines of St. Joseph s economic area.
1

IV-3

�It thus seeks to make a distinction between productive activity which brings
new money into the community (basic activity), and productive activity which
simply recirculates money which is already there (service activity).

The

concept holds that basic industry is the key to the city's economic strength,
and expansion in basic lines usually means growth in service activity and
thus growth in the local economy.
Economic studies, in the past, have utilized many different factors and
methods for identification of the economic base of a city.

The method

utilized in this analysis of St. Joseph's economic base is a variation of
an approximation technique perfected by Homer Hojt and employed in his study
for the New York Regional Plan Association.

This technique assumes that the

population of a particular urban area consumes its proportionate share of the
national production of goods and services and that all production in excess of
this amount may be considered basic.
Thus, basic employment in manufacturing is estimated by first determining for
each standard census classification of manufacturing activity, its percentage
of the city's total labor force and then comparing this figure with its
percentage of the United States total labor force.

For each line in which a

city's showing in the employment ratio exceeds the U. S. showing in the employment ratio, the increment in excess is multiplied times the total employees in
St. Joseph thereby giving the number of basic employees in that line.
By similar analysis of wholesale and retail trade, finance, transportation,
and other classes of economic activity, the technique estimates basic employment in each of these lines.

Totalled, these estimates are used as an

approximation of the basic employment in the city of St. Joseph .

IV-4

�An analysis of the economic base of St. Joseph in 1970 (Table IV-8) indicates
a significant degree of basic employment in durable manufacturing with a lesser
degree of basic employment in wholesale-retail trade and services.

The city's

rate of total resident labor force employed in durable manufacturing is twice
that of the United States.
The city's major industries are a home appliance manufacturer, a rubber
products company, an automobile parts supplier and an electronics industry.
This concentration of durable industries within the city, makes its economy
susceptible to fluctuation in national economic activity.
EMPLOYMENT
Employment of the labor force of St. Joseph is shown both by industry
(Chart IV-C) and by occupation (Chart IV-D).

In 1970 manufacturing employed

37% of the labor force; personal services 16%, retail trade 18%, and public
services 18%.
categories.

The remaining 11% were distributed among miscellaneous

While St. Joseph's total employed labor force decreased 1.6% between 1960
and 1970, the labor force employed in retail trade and public services
increased 22% and 44% respectively.

Employment by occupation shows the most

gain in the sales, clerical, and kindred workers category, an increase of
9% from 1960 to 1970 and over 200% from 1940 to 1970.

Service and private

household workers show~d an increase of 8%, sales and clerical workers 3.4%.
The greatest loss in employment were those of operatives, 7.7%; and craftsmen and foremen, 6.8%.

IV-5

�Table IV-B

1970 ECONOMIC BASE INDICATORS FOR ST. JOSEPH

u.

Percent Em2lo_yed
St. Joseph
s.

Basic Employment

0.92

Agriculture

3.70

Mining

0.82

Construction

5.97

4.08

Durable

15. 33

29.90

Non Durable

10.57

7.02

6. 77

3.14

20 .18

20.80

5.01

4 .31

26.22

27.28

5.48

2.55

Manuf~cturing

Transportation, Comm.,
Utilities
Wholesale and Retail
Trade
Finance, Ins.,
Real Estate
Services
Public Adm.

Source:

697

30

51

U.S. Census

IV-6
-

-=::a=----iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiili_iiiiill_ _ _ _ __

�\.

....

1950-60-70 EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY FOR ST. JOSEPH

AGRICULTURE, MINI~G AND
CONSTRUCTION

MANUFACTURING

TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION
AND UTILITIES

WHOLESALE TRADE

RETA! L

TRADE

PERSONAL SERVICES

PUBLIC SERVICES

OTHER INDUSTRIES
(INCLUDING NOT REPORTED)

0

1~

1950

400

Cillsill] 1960
IV-7

800
1200 1600 2000
Number of Persons Employed

2400

2600

U. S. Bu r ea

�Chart IV-D

1950-60-70 EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION FOR ST. JOSEPH

PROFESSIONAL, TECHNICAL AND
KINDRED WORKERS

LABORERS, FARMERS AND
KINDRED vJORKERS

MANAGERS, OFFICIALS,
PROPRIETORS, EXCLUDING FARM

SALES, CLERICAL AND KINDRED WORKERS

CRAFTSMEN, FOREMEN AND
KINDRED WORKERS

OPERATIVES AND KINDRED WORKERS

~ !:!:!

: =~:

=~: ~:

i:::~:!:!~ =;:i:~ ~ !i ~ !=·

i=~:~: ~:!:;:i=; =!:i=!: i:: =: =:!:~::: ~:!:

= :~

= == = =

;\~1E:tA-'i:.\:;Ca~~£::~--::;::·:}.i:~;,;~: _: :~:f{~{:~'.::
SERVICE WORKERS INCLUDING
PRIVATE HOUSEHOLD

OCCUPATION NOT REPORTED

0

~

1950

200

400
60
800
1000
Number of Persons Employed
Source:

1200

1300
-

�•
RETAIL
As indicated in Chart IV-E, retail sales and payroll has increased consistently
between 1963 and 1972, 35% and 47 % respectively, while the total number of
retail establishments in the city has fluctuated.

Even though within the

city, employment in retail trade has increased 7.5% between 1960 and 1970
(Chart IV-C), the city has since 1963 continuously captured a decreasing
portion of Berrien County's total retail sales as indicated in Table IV-A.
In 1972 the city of St. Joseph accounted for 7.8% of Berrien County 1 s total
retail sales while in 1970 encompassing 6.7% of the county's total population.
With St. Joseph's above average incomes it is evident that the city is not
capturing its proportion share of the area s retail trade.
1

MANUFACTURING
Within St. Joseph between 1963 and 1972 value added by manufacturing has
increased 138% and employment in manufacturing has increased 43% (Chart IV-F).
During the same time period St. Joseph s percentage of Berrien County's total
1

value added by manufacturing decreased from 27.3% to 25.0% and between 1960
and 1970 the number of St. Joseph residents employed by manufacturing
industries increased by 14%.
This indicates that the city's expansion in manufacturing is not keeping pace
with that of the county's and that a significant portion of St. Joseph 1 s new
manufacturing jobs are being occpied by non-residents.

SELECTED SERVICES
The total selected service establishments and receipts in St. Joseph between
1963 and 1972 has increased 47% and 195% respectively (Chart IV-G).

This

trend is substantiated by a constant increase in St. Joseph's percent of
Berrien County's total receipts from services between 1963 and 1972.
IV-9

�1958-72 RETAIL PAYROLL, SALES, AND ESTABLISHMENTS FOR ST. JOSEPH

4,500

190

4,000

••••
••••
••••

••••
••
••
••
••
. .....
••
......
••
......
......
••
......
••
......
••
...
••
. .....
••
......
••
••
............
••
......
•
......

Payroll ($1 ,OOO) 3,500
......

and

I

~ Sales ($10,000)

Chart IV-E

3,000

,••••••••••••• c

....-

2,500

,,.•...........•.............

180

170
Establishments
160

......

............

......
....
~........
,..... ....

150

2 , 0 0 0 - . _ _ _ - + - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - ; - - - - - - - ; - - ~ -140
1958
1963
1967
1972

.......

Retail Payroll

"

Retail Sales

111111111111

Retail Establishments
Source:

U.S. Census

�-

l

1958-72 ~~NUFACTURING EMPLOYMENT AND VALUE ADDED FOR ST. JOSEPH

7,500

t

7,000

t

6,500

+

/

;;;

"'
:"'"'
"'

+160

."'.:
..:

I

IV-F

+ 180

.

I

Chart

+140

:

"'

"'

6,000

.....
&lt;

I
.....
.....

Employment

5,500

5,000

+

i
:
"'
:. :
"'

I

l

/

+

r20

;. "'"'

f

+100

"'"'

.
,,,,,,,~

I

Value Added
( l , 000, 000)

+ 80

,,,,,,,
~,,,,,

....

4,500

.........
.....
.....
.....
.........
......

t

+ 60

......

4,000

I

,.........
I

1958

I

1966

19~7

,tn

Employment

I

40

Value Added

Source:

U.S. Census

f'llllllllllllllll

J

�Chart IV-G
1954-72 SELECTED SERVICES ESTABLISHMENTS AND TOTAL RECEIPTS FOR ST. JOSEPH

1701

I

160

I

130

_.

N

Establishments

120

!

:l

+
+

+12

+11

:

t9

.:

I

t 7

,,,,,~
,,,,
,..,,

,,,

,,,,,,

,,11111111111111111•'

70

Establishments

1954

1963

1967

Total Receipts
(1,000,000)

+8

.. ..

I

I

+10

:
:
.:

I

90 +
80

.::

/!

110+
100

:l

I

140 +
&lt;I

13

::

150 +

.....

r4

+

6

-t

5

4

1972

Total Receipts
So~-.ce:

U. S. Census

11111111111111111

�y

Between 1960 and 1970 the number of service workers excluding private household workers within the city increased by 19% indicating a trend of the city
becoming more of a service oriented community .

•

IV-13

�SUMMARY

Within St. Joseph, manufacturing has always been and continues to be a most
important economic sector in relation to economic base and employment.

From

1963 to 1972 wholesale and retail trades economic significance decreased
substantially while during the same time period the economic significance of
selected services experienced a gradual increase within the city.

IV-14

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals
1.

Strengthen the economic base of St. Joseph.

2.

Provide 'adequate job opportunities for St. Joseph's residents.

3.

Increase St. Joseph's tax base.

Objectives
l.

Maintain downtown St. Joseph's retail position within the region's market

2.

Provide adequate opportunities for industrial development within the city.

IV -15

�a:;

V.

PARKS AND RECREATION

A public r~creation system, itself, has two main ingredients:
facilities.

programs and

This section will be confined to a look at St. Joseph's existing

facilities and future facility needs.

Meaningful planning for recreational

facilities must, however, be strongly related to planning for recreational
programs as well.
Guidelines for Recreation Lands
In order to compare existing and future demands for facilities, a set of
standards must be used.
and not steadfast rules.

These standards should be treated only as guidelines
A wide variation between types of recreational

facilities and community needs can be adequately considered with proper use
of comprehensive guidelines.

The following table is a set of guidelines

used for St. Joseph in determining the adequacy of the city's existing outdoor recreational supply.

GUIDELINE FOR RECREATION LANDS
St. Joseph, Michigan

CLASSIFICATION

SERVICE AREA

ACRES/
POPULATION

SIZE
(ACRES)

Playground/Playfield
Neighborhood Park

½ Mile Radius

5/1 ,000

2-20

City-wide

5/1 ,000

20 or more

City-wide Park

V-1

�Playground/Playfield, Neighborhood Parks, are relatively small units intended
to serve residents within walking or bicycle distance of the facility.

Play-

grounds may include areas of play apparatus, informal play space, sand box,
and wading pool.
facilities.

It is not necessary for each playground to have all

Playfields include open areas relatively free of trees, fences,

and other obstacles and should be large enough to support one or more football or baseball games.

Hard surface areas should be at a minimum.

City-wide parks should serve the entire community, providing all facilities
of lesser classified parks as well as unique features such as bandstands,
natural areas, picnic shelters, playfields, tennis courts, and swimming
pools.

In that city-wide parks serve the purpose of a neighborhood park to

adjacent neighborhoods, 20% of the city's city-wide park acreage should be
used in computing the total required neighborhood park acreage.
A comparison of Table V-A with proposed guidelines for recreational lands
indicates that St. Joseph with an estimated 1975 population of 11,330
presently has sufficient recreational lands to meet its present recreational
needs.

The distribution of these lands throughout the city, also appears to

adequately meet the needs of the city's residents.
In Section I of this report, we indicated that the population of St. Joseph
is anticipated to remain constant through the year 2000 . This anticipated
population stability will curtail the need for future significant acquis i tion
of land for recreational use.

Therefore, a majority of St. Joseph's future

public expenditures in the area of recreation could be directed toward
development of the city's existing recreational lands and the acquisition of
unique recreational sites.

V-2

�;:g

Table V-A

INVENTORY OF PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES FOR ST. JOSEPH 1975

Size
(acres)

Classification and Name

Special Uses

Playground and Playfield - Neighborhood Parks
Botham Park

0.5

Playground,
Tot lot

Dickenson Park

8.4

Playfield,
Passive

Lions Park

13.4

Playground

Point Park

0.3

Passive

Whittlesey Park

2.7

Playground
Ice-skating

( 25.3)

City-Wide Parks
8.2

Bluff Park
Kiwanis

-

19.2

Lookout Point Park

0.8

Riverview Park

112 .8

Tiscornia Park

16.9
(157.9)

V-3

Bandshell - Ornamental,
Passive
Playground, Playfield
Tennis
Scenic, Passive
Playgrounds, Playfields,
Picnic, Boat Launch
Beach

�Recreation and People
Many considerations affect the need for recreational programs and facilities
in a community and the form these facilities should take.

The most important

of these considerations are those factors relating to the people the system
is meant to serve.
Among the characteristics of people that affect their need for public
recreational facilities are the following:

1. Age
The amount and type of recreation people pursue is related
to their age. Younger people tend to participate
frequently in a wide variety of active pursuits. The
older population, on the other -hand, tends to participate
in fewer and more passive activities.
It must be recognized, however, that recrea-tion is not only
for children or young people. People of all ages participate
in recreational pursuits of one sort or another. Planning
for public recreation areas is not, therefore, just a matter
of providing a few parks and plaugrounds for children. It
means planning recreation areas for people of all ages that
are well related to their very different needs.

2.

Income
The number of recreational activities people pursue is
related to their income. Generally speaking, the higher
the income, the more numerous are the recreational pursuits.

3.

Education
Education affects participation in recreationa in much the
same way as does income. The higher one's educational
attainmen-t, the more numerous, generally, are his recrea-tional
pursuits.

4.

Occupation
The number and variety of leisure activities are related
to occupation and occupation prestige. People in work with
higher occupational prestige tend to engage in more varied
and active recreation.

5.

Mobility
People with greater mobility tend to be more ac-tive
recreationally. People with more restricted mobiU·t y
(the elderly, for example) typically participate less often
in recreational activities.

-

�4!!!!4

!•

I
[I

i

To meet the needs of people with widely differing characteristics, and thus
widely differing recreational needs, a complete park and recreation system
must be composed of properties that differ in function, size, location,
•
service area, and character of development.
The .1974 R. L. Polk survey, discussed in Section I, Table I-D indicates
that there is a concentration of one person and retired households in
neighborhoods 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 (Map I-E).

The survey also indicates a

high concentration of households with children and households with five or
more persons in neighborhoods 10, 11, 12, and 14.

In the area of income

distribution, the data indicates a concentration of above-average income
households in neighborhoods 1 and 9-14 and below-average income households in
neighborhoods 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8.

These and other neighborhood demographic

characteristics should be taken into consideration when developing the city's
existing and future park facilities.

V-5

�SUMMARY
An inventory of the city's existing recreational lands indicates that
St. Joseph has sufficient acreage for its present and projected populace's
needs.

However, there are unique scenic and recreational sites within the

community such as Silver Beach that could be acquired and preserved for public
use.

Development of the city's recreational lands should be tailored to the

unique demographic characteristics of the city and the surrounding neighborhood

J

needs.

V-6

-

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals
1.

To insure
the provision of adequate and suitable recreational opportunities
'
to all residents of St. Joseph.

Objectives

I-

l.

Preserve for public recreational use, St. Joseph's unique recreational
sites, such as St. Joseph River frontage, Lake Michigan beaches, and
Lake Michigan scenic vistas.

2.

Provide recreational facilities that fit the unique demographic characteristi
of the city's neighborhoods.

V-7

�VI.

PUBLIC FACILITIES AND UTILITIES

Water Supply and Distribution System
The City of St. Joseph owns and operates its own water supply and treatment
facility, which is located approximately 6,800 feet southerly along the shore
of Lake Michigan from the outlet of the St. Joseph River.

Since 1971, the

city has also contracted water services to the "Lake Michigan Shoreline Water
and Sewage Treatment Authority" which covers Lincoln and St. Joseph townships.
The plant is presently undertaking an expansion program which is anticipated
to be completed in January of 1976.

The following description reviews the

plant as is anticipated to operate after the above mentioned expansion is
complete.
Raw water for the plant is drawn from an intake crib consisting of four 7-foot
diameter steel funnels extending five feet above the lake bottom, and located
about l ,500 feet from shore.

Water is brought to the low-service pumping

station through a 24 inch diameter concrete intake pipe and chlorinated at
this point.

At the treatment plant, the low-service pumping station has a

normal capacity of 20 MGD (million gallons per day) and lifts the water to
the plant for treatment.

Preliminary treatment is provided through three

accelerator upflow basins in parallel with a conventional mixing and settling
tank for backup use.

Following settling, twelve rapid sand filters filter

the water after which the water is stored in two ground reservoirs and
deliver it to system pressure.

The system also includes a 750,000 gallon

elevated water storage tank located north on the bank of the St. Joseph
River.
The St. Joseph plant is rated for 16 million gallons per day.

For short-term

overload, this plant could handle up to 20 MGD without seriously impairing the
VI-1

�Table VI-A

PAST TRENDS AND PROJECTED DEMANDS FOR ST. JOSEPH WATER TREATMENT PLANT

Year
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1Yl3

1974
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000

of
City
St. Joseph
Max. Day
MGD

"AUTHORITY"
Max. Day
MGD

6.871
7. 159
7.494
8.523
8.655
6.792*
9.646**
9.900
10. l 00
10.200
10.300
11 . 000
11 .300
11 .400
11. 500
11. 500

0
0
1. 270
2.780
4.520
4,710
4.900
6.600
8.300
10.250
12.200
12.200

Total
MGD
6.871
7 .159
7.494
8.523
8.655
6.792*
11.916
12.680
14.620
14.910
15.200
17.600
19.600
21.650
23.700
23.700

*Low figure due to Whirlpool Corporation being on strike during normal
period of heavy demand.
**Maximum Day 1971, from Period l/1 thru 6/30.

City of St. Joseph - Maximum Day Demand _
11
Author1ty 11 Maximum Day Demand

Source:

Consoer, Townsend and Associates
Consulting Engineers

....
VI-2

�ru

.

~

...... S'

n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-I

I~

__._.,,..J_____,

__

)
CITY OF

SAINT JOSEPH
BERRIEN

COUNTY

MICHIGAN

h•

'I- _ ··~·

.JL
- _qi
-11
, /&amp;- - ~~I
/\\ IIfJ

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

l~
/

.~
( :l •,,/,,fj :"·... ' : · . .

I..

LEGEND :
Existing Mains

'-'\
"-:..·

'.·\

l
I

11

. -•:

,

,

!

~
~
(!)

'
~
(J

~

'

&lt;
1,~

I

w

'-.,
~
~

~

"

/'!" 'N

Soutt1MNlllam Michigan Reglonel Plenring Conwnisaiont;.,;-- + - - - - + - - - + - - - - ~
,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

•

"

'I

'

1.-----~

2007 ~ Slnlel · SI -"""Ill\ Micnuon ~ · .....,.,,,. ti16/98.l 15"9

.... c--....w---..-~..........

�I

-

quality of the treated water, however, its present intake quantity is limited
to 16 MGD.
The estimated demand schedule (Table VI-A) prepared by Consoer Townsend and
Associates, consulting firm, indicates that the St. Joseph plant will require

I -

I

expansion to 20 MGD capacity by 1980 and a further expansion to 24 MGD by the
year 2000 .

•
'

The city's present water distribution system (Map IV-B) is reprotedly adequate
with a few isolated pressure problem areas caused by four inch lines.

As part

of the present plant expansion program, a thirty inch transmission line was
constructed between the plant and a twenty-four inch line on Lake Avenue thereby
boosting the water pressure in south St. Joseph.
Sanitary and Storm Sewer Systems
In 1951 the Cities of Benton Harbor and St. Joseph jointly constructed a
sewage treatment plant located in Industrial Island in the St. Joseph River.
The original plant was designed to provide primary treatment capacity for 8.0
MGD (million gallons per day) daily average wastewater flows, and secondary
treatment for 4.0 MGD.
To quality for federal and state funding assistance, the cities agreed that
the plant was to serve as an area-wide facility extending services to the
contiguous communities and areas beyond the present cities' limits.

To

facilitate the area-wide concept, Berrien County was established as the planning and funding agency for wastewater treatment for the two cities.

The

recently completed additions were provided to increase the treatment capacity
of the plant and upgrade treatment to comply with current pollution control
requirements.

VI-4

�- - -

,,
CITY OF

\

SAINT JOSEPH
BERRIEN

COUNTY

MICHIGAN

SANITARY AND STORM
SEWER SYSTEM

_-.~·-----: 1.~
:::--..

;:.,~~~~-~l It
r~

~~

LEGEND:
Existing Santary Sewer Mains
I/;,

••

············· Existing Storm Sewer Lines

~

Combined Sanitary-Storm
Sewer Area

~

Storm Sewer Separation
Program Area

H ((

'-

..

-(
'

"'\

......

i1i~~ :\
I•~
I
0

' \1

i:'
- \ ~ " I,-~....' )
I

•••

.

t

f,

If

~

I

,,J
I

I

~
~

t

'

(J

~

'

~
I
V,

'.--.°I].

~

'

IL

1;

~-L■
••·\
. _ '!lf.
: 11

·•

1-

\\r,:,i

.#...•.•..
.....:
........

\~

"
I

~

-- ,

I

I

I
I

I
I

I

I
I
I

&lt;8
Southwaatiem Michigan Regional Plmnng Convnission

/

/1\,,, ,. . ,. ,,-~,
I I I
I I I

M"

I

"-----1

•
8

'lOOT°'""°'1~-Sl~. Mlci'qV1"9085 · ~6l6/98J15.:'9

..... ,...,..c....,w__
.... ,_c- _ ..... ...,_

~. , ..

__

,,

--•tNllt

,

~ :.,,,-;:;,.- ~ f l

~: :,; ~ •~ ~

~

�The present wastewater treatment plant is of the complete treatment modified
activated sludge type (Kraus Process) with separate sludge digestion, chemical
treatment fpr phosphorous removal and sludge de-watering by vacuum filtration.
It is designed to provide capacity for an average daily wastewater flow of
13.5 MGD during the canning season, with a maximum daily capacity of 19.5 MGD.
Peak hydraulic capacity of the plant is 24.0 MGD with one of three raw wastewater pumps out of service.
The majority of the sanitary and storm sewer lines located in the older portion
of St. Joseph (Map VI-C) are combined, thus allowing storm water to enter
sanitary sewer lines during times of storm and causing sporadic overflow discharges.

In the summer of 1975, the city initiated a storm and sanitary sewer

separation program on that portion of the city's combined sewers west of Main
Street.

The total project entailed the construction of 10,000 lineal feet of

storm sewer line.

At the time of this writing, approximately 1,000 lineal

feet have been constructed.
The more recnetly constructed storm and sanitary sewer lines in the southern
portion of the city, are not combined.

The size of the sanitary lateral lines

in this portion of the city are reportedly adequate, however, the continued
southerly growth of the city has caused this area's sanitary sewer trunk lines
to become inadequate (under-sized).

This urban growth has also produced

inadequacies in south St. Joseph culverts.
Municipal Buildings
The St. Joseph City Hall, which houses police department, fire department, and
most city offices, is ideally located for its functioning.

There are several

limitations, however, to its continued adequacy as to size and arrangement.
For example, nearly every available space within the building is being used,
there is inadequate parking, an d the building is quite old.
VI-6

�The near future will probably see in increase in the number of functions that
the city will be called upon to administer.

This may necessitate the long

range need for additional space for city administrative offices.
The recent years have seen extensive development on the southern portion of
the ·city and adjacent township.

This area's proximity to the city's sole fire

station indicates that long range alternatives should be considered for the

~

provisions of fire protection to southern St. Joseph.
The city's recently constructed library is an excellent facility which is
ideally located in relation to downtown and has adequate land for future expansion.

VI-7

�SUMMARY

The City of St. Joseph's water supply and distribution system and sanitary
sewage treatment
facilities are adequate for the city's present and future
•
projected needs.

However, its sanitary and storm sewer collection systems

have a number of deficiencies for which the city has correctional measures
underway.

The community's municipal buildings are adequate for ~ts present

needs, however, demands upon the city services may necessitate additional
municipal space in the future.

VI-8

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals
1.

To insure the provision of adequate public services to meet the future
needs of St. Joseph.

Objectives
1.

Elimination of all combined storm/sanitary sewer lines within the city.

2.

Replacement where feasible, of undersized sanitary sewer trunk lines and

-

I

storm and culverts in south St. Joseph.

--1

VI-9

�r

VII.

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Transportation in the United States is entering a new era.

•

Two important

components of this era will be continued sensitivity to the natural and human
environment and the concerns for conserving energy.

Given this changing

climate it is more important than ever that transportation facilities be in
harmony with the environment and the communities of which they are a part.
To have transportation shape land use is no longer necessary as it once was.
Whereas, previously land could only be developed within transportation
corridors, now land can be developed using other criteria and the transportation
system can be designed to serve that criteria.

Nevertheless, the coordinated

interrelationship between land use and transportation patterns is still important as can be seen by the following examples:
l.

Transportation enables land to be developed.
property is crucial for development.

Access to

Traditionally, localities

encouraged construction of transportation facilities because it
enabled them to expand their tax base to finance community
service.

For example, a prime tool used to attract industry

has been to extend rail service into industrial parks within a
community.

This extension of transportation service enables

more diversified industrial uses to be attracted to a community s
1

industrial park.
2.

Highway and traffic can stabilize or change existing land uses.
Limited access highways can stabilize existing land use since
access is limited to

interchanges.

Limited access discourages

strip commercial development while it encourages clustered
commercial development at interchanges.

VII-1

Although new highways

�'

-,

may precipitate change toward higher density, once the change
occurs the land use will usually change less along the limited
access highway than along unlimited ones.
3.

Land use can impair the efficiency of streets and transit.
Streets designed to serve a certain traffic volume can become
inefficient as land uses occur that create poor traffic
conditions such as frequent left turns, double parking, or
lines of cars waiting to enter a parking lot.

Highway systems

are also affected when unplanned land use changes occur such
as when a regional shopping center is located along streets
designed to serve smaller volumes of traffic.
4.

Land values vary.

Undue profits to property owners adjacent

to freeway interchanges and improved roads are well known to
the public.

Value can also be negatively affected if noise,

congestion or safety hazards exist especially in residential
neighborhoods.
These brief examples of the interrelationship of land use and
transportation are intended to prepare the way to provide a
better understanding of how transportation systems can be used
to achieve community goals and objectives.

USE OF EXISTING STREET SYSTEM
This section of the report will be concerned with providing a better understanding of the existing transportation system within the city of St. Joseph,
and determining the patterns and trends of all types of transportation within
the city.

This evaluation of the existing transportation system and the

examination of various types of transportation are intended to illustrate not
VII-2

�r

only the interdependence of transportation and land use, but also the interdependence of all communities within the Twin Cities area .
•
There are considerable
fluctuations in the volumes of traffic between the

different months of the year, the different days of the week, and different
hours of the day.

But for our purposes, we will use the results from the

1972 Origin and Destination Survey prepared by the Michigan Department of
State Highways and Transportation for the Benton Harbor and St. Joseph area.
The traffic flow patterns within the area can be termed unusual.

This is due

primarily to the locations of two downtown retail and employment centers
located directly across from each other and connected by two bridges.

Hence,

an "hourglass effect" takes place with high traffic volumes showing significant
increases as you approach the St. Joseph downtown business district from either
a southerly or a northerly direction (see Map VII-A).

Increasingly heavy

traffic volumes were found to exist in excess of 20,000 vehicles per day on
Lake Shore Drive, Main Street, Niles Avenue and Napier Avenue within the
city.

Today, St. Joseph's highway system is plagued with various deficiencies

as a result of heavy traffic build-ups on existing arteries.

This condition

is best reflected on the 1972 Street Network Map which shows the sections
over a level of "C" capacity.

It is important to keep in mind what is meant

by the level of 11 C11 capacity because a road which is over the level of "C"
capacity does not necessarily suddenly stop moving.
As defined by the Highway Capacity Manual, there are six levels of service
from A through F and the "Level of service C is still in the zone of stable
flow but speeds and maneuverability are more closely controlled by the higher
volumes.

Most of the drivers are restricted in their freedom to select their

own spged, change lanes or pass.

A relatively satisfactory operating speed

is still obtained, with service volumes perhaps suitable for the community."
VII-3

�I

I
1

I
;

I

I.

I

/
\

I

z
•! •

I •

¥

jI

fl

:c
c..

w
en
u.O

0

-,

&gt;C L() r-

&gt;z~
(.)

&lt;.'.)

Z

I

lJ.J

(.)

-

(/')

r
~

i

LU
CI)

~IL
J I1ji'~

-

z era:

&lt;t

-

::)Z
0 &lt;1:

li

CL

&lt;t

~

~

g

==:£

z

,=;;;;;;::;;.:

I

LL

-LLu

LL

&lt;r

.._a::
C\J

fn

Vll -4

dI •

i :

�Essentially, the streets where problems occurred in 1972 are along major
routes situated in the city as follows (see Map VII-8):
Facilities Oto 25% over the level of 11 C11 capacity include:
1.

Main between Niles and Port.

2.

Wayne on Industrial Island.

3.

Broadway between Wayne and Court in St. Joseph City.

Streets which are 25% to 50% over the level of 11 C11 capacity include:
1.

The short stretch of Wayne between Port and Morrison Channel.

2.

Hilltop between Cleveland and Niles.

3.

Cleveland between Hilltop and Hawthorne.

Facilities which are 50% or more over the level of 11 C11 capacity include:
1.

The bridge over the Morrison Channel.

2.

Napier from Langely to Niles.

These high traffic volumes in turn, have an adverse affect on adjacent
residential communities, since the users of the transportation system tend
to look for the path of least resistance to reach their destination (see
Map VII-C).

As we can see by the major street network, which was derived from

the traffic flow study, the basically residential streets of South State, St.
Joseph, Langley, Highland, Kingsley, Wolcott, Lakeview and Morton, have
filtered into the major street network to provide relief for the over capacitated
arterials within the city of St. Joseph. This overflow of automobile traffic
onto residential streets has an adverse affect on adjacent property by negatively
affecting the neighborhoods with noise, safety hazards, and pollution.

These

negative impacts tend to have an adverse affect on residential neighborhoods,
making them less desirable to live in.

*SMRPC analysis of area.

VII-5

These adverse affects may not be obvious

�CITY OF

SAINT JOSEPH
BERRIEN

COUNTY

M ICHIGAN

1972 STREET NETWORK
LEGEND
111111111111111

----•• • •••

00 to

25% over capacity

25 to

50% over capacity

✓ / \_,,;:,.f✓,:!ll_..

50%+ over capacity

1 , -

.~-

I Hf

J ~;

1

_· -

II

-

/4'-

I

/J

j,z /1

/. , , /,

J..$ 7 I/ /fJ/
_.$1
_jj/ // //,
❖- ,J
I;
/(.

1., r } / /

✓, ' $

,zr~r..Fru:

"-,,_,.

-· ,, I

[_ J[Jl]L.,,,.....
L"9c

~

[

,

~

·oE~l

.. c_- l I

.,_

't: - 7:t'J
~.1

I
0-

'
I

'I

:

1
\

.. I /

:·

. . Lo

•

,

f·

\

I

-·

'

A

I

I 11../
I1-, IIi ,.. , ·
f

/

Cf

lI l1-,.,"
.. ~

~'

l ~ 1-

) 1.

1/1 ...

Uw
illJlll l
-- l LJ ul . . ,'
_I
!II
.

JI.In~~
!LJ_J LJ
l..J []
L~ [. -J
Lu . -··.JIl....::::
- ;H w
fj-:=)~"

&lt;

'

,

Ill

r ~ ,_ JL..J

-~·~

'

~

.

-~ -- tJ[ -· :

G._]

(.)

.

-·. , ~
\i \\ ,~'~ .

1~

,1rt..,

'•· \

'

, '~s.

l~J[Jciu· 1, ~[ :i:-: 11.

•111,~J

'
~

l11,.

JI

.

':,.·
, .( \

r. '-1~·IL...,, :~·.~/-~-;~f .·

it

-

lI -·

J

7[ -_.._ ] ~•

( ..

••

:-·

~
\\.\ \ ·1

' _.

W\~

l ll[_,_ .]I -, J [_. -·

[_

~

/

t / ~- / /

l ' I ~l[ )[_ ~11f
1

/ I

... . ..... a •.

:;.r.~·~. '

r//4~'t ////t:,1.,j//
,.J'/1 I~
I(,, I

~

~I(

1.'
~ I, " ~
J/1/ /1,, ,.I

rSJ~
1/ ~.:;r }

··

/ '·~~; .

tVFR

[ff$~r;_
I

~

l- i-_ . I,-· " f

·1 ~r-7
~
,, -~
'

)f·.''

~\ \~

:

-, \

),:;,

~

\~

(9

~

1' 1- I" 1·-·
N

Sc:JuthMMlm Mlchlgm, Regional Plerri,g Cot•-•--• "(

-------- --

'I

.

'
'

I._ _____ •I

Mft

'l9fJ1 o.-,,, ~ · SI ~ Mcttgen '9065 · Tolol]hcl-.. 616/9631529

... -c-.•
. . _c-_
......
~

"

- J

�I
I
l
l
I
II

I.

I

I

z

d

•! ;

I ;

i •

I • II

!h
I.
I
I
I

I

I

:::c

I

Q.

UJ &gt;I-

.I

(/)

II

0

u..

0

-,

&gt;-

I
I

I-

u

0

~
~

Z

I

UJ

(.)

a:

UJ
CD

-

-

~

~

cno
r- _J
W LL

I

-~i···
o·..

w

0:: 0
r(f) LL
LL
LL &lt;!

.

•'

0 0::

I
I

~r0::

~-

r- 0
wZ
z er

I
I

I

___________ JI

_J

0~

I

-- - -- -- - - - --,

I

/

I

,:J

/

(.9 0..
(.9

z
-z

j

j

z

(/)

r"\

I
1

u

I- a:

-&lt;!

I
I

z
:) z

I- CfJ&gt;
- 0::
CJ (f)
w

~

t,,

v11-1

�in the city today, because of its relative stability.

However, a general

downgrading of residential neighborhoods can be predicted and is taking place
as traffic flows continue to increase unchecked.

FUTURE DEMANDS ON THE EXISTING TRAFFIC SYSTEM
In the second phase of analyzing the traffic system for the St. Joseph area,
travel volumes have been generated from the year 2000 Socio-Economic Data and
imposed upon the 1972 existing street network plus any planned construction
projects that are committed for the St. Joseph area.

Projects which were

added to the 1972 system include:
1.

Replacement of bridges across the St. Joseph River and Morrison
Channel with widened approaches and crossings on Wayne.

2.

Hawthorne and Lake Shore widened to five lanes at intersection
and install a traffic light.

3.

Hilltop widened to five lanes from Lake Shore to Niles.

4.

U.S. 31 relocated.

5.

I-94 BL section relocated between Hilltop and I-94 along the I &amp;M
power line and abandoned railway right-of-way.

With the projected year 2000 traffic on the existing and committed system, the
following facilities show a need for future improvement (see Map VII-D):

•

Facilities Oto 25% over the level of 11 C11 capacity include:
1.

Main between Port and Pleasant.

2.

Blossomland Bridge across the St. Joseph River.

Streets 25% to 50% over the 11 C11 level capacities include:
l.

Hilltop between Niles and Cleveland.

2.

Niles between St. Joseph and Pleasant.

Streets which are more than 50% over the level of C11 capacity on the existing
network include:
11

l.

Cleveland between Hilltop and Hawthorne.
VII-8

�)

)
CITY OF

SAINT JOSEPH
BERRIEN

COUNTY

MICH IGAN

EXISTING AND COMMITTED STREET
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE YEAR 2000
LEGEND
•••••••••••••••••••••

------• • • •

00 to

25% over capacity

25 to

50% over capacity

'"]

• ··· :l~--"-~~Jl 1r

• • • • • 50%+ over capacity

r;,~v~~
✓~ ~~

I
,,-

/7,

/

;,( '

'v'[

h'

,

'.

r&gt;l'd~.- ~1e~~-·
l
·
D
!
.
.
lJ
r;~h,,:.
11/'-y~ C
/~~~ ~
1

✓,,_ ••

. •• , ..

_,,, -

I

"' /

~-

•/l

-

VER

.,

, / ' '"\ ; -'

ur
~.

.

-,:::::.--.
'

,,("~--. 0 , .:

~7,~

~ -4,

-

..
"-·-~ .........

0,~~ -~
½'('. ' .
K;, ( (:1.
/4 M
/, " .

~

, ' -

,~

1
. '

,.

"

/.J7~' " 1/4'J/4/, 'C\.· ;! ' ,,
. ' ., . \ .
'
J;;/{)!.,if/l);/# 1l\\ V\_ ~. \ ·.
~~-I,

. /~ ;J;;

··:·:YI

I

•-!(\~ / V('_v,

,f;Vt -~ /i /li, .
1/"~!r .~/ Jl~,¥ z 1/2

, 1~s,
. \''

✓;
1/"./4....

"'-I'/ ''," • /(, .,/'

_/i ;;Y

·fl~

y~r.·
L..

/,'

u •-,..,_,'A
1;
,~J/
·~
/,
/( J
/'
J L rlt ! - (:t;,
;,,__

7

~
~

'
~
I;.)

~

'

'

~
.

JI1-

l
l -

11 -. ..-

I11 ... 1J.: ;·
Lr · - lr-...,_,,
._,.
[:...,.

• ,,

·

1/I

II
/J

r

1:,,.,,_7 - .

lr~-'-, I
11

.

:

-

,---=- ..

.l QI
11·-:'::. 7 1.- . . ~.J[ .1[
....

.

7

•

~"-...I

GJI

"""' •

! ,, ,,

.

:

___ :'. I

.. .
!

,,

•

I •

• L

. .. _.. -

..~..

-

q\i I ,

.-.
.

~ ,\_ .

\\

.JA ~ fn[11.... J ".
:_::7[. -i~)~~~)
1r 111 ·-- __]J1J~~J/2 -~4
'
!.

~

'

li ~l rr.. ]L.".J I·
I ~- ll -·
. .. I . :
·-r '!LJ[] .,. ,. .,.
J
.
n. --[
} -- ,•
--7·
~~~- ,_7J ~
-~·~-ir].: -

'

~.

~

L ~[ 1

"

1 - ,.._;,(

Il~..,.;·.-_ --:X1f!"·l/ . ,.. ,'
[

Jfll

. ,,__

.

~r:~ 11[1[7
. ,r,i';iLf r::. - . _
7n[7
u.1 l rr:
·.'~ b~Jl~dn=-_j=.::?r· ~c . . . ,J~;~:~:

'

.

·'

.

.
'

.

,o

...........

.

::

'·

/

.,

1

·l!-~i,-----.r-~il:n□ I~ )G''r I 1\

&lt;

I~

I
-0

,\

I

'v

\-

t
,
.
,
.
,
_
(8
===~l-:7~
-·

~

"

N

I I I

.........
.....
..,.,_c..._....,...,.,,.,.,..

I

-("

•

••,.u,

"
I

�2.

Napier from the St. Jose~h River to Niles.

These are the probable problem areas that the community will be confronted
with within the next 25 years.

Generally, these problem areas are located

within neighborhood
analysis area numbers 4 and 12.
I

These areas are the

large commercial and service areas adjacent to prime residential neighborhoods
within the city of St. Joseph.

The expected job growth in areas 4 and 12 is

generally the reason for existing and future problems in the city.
TRANSIT
In general,

transit improvements are alternatives to highway expansion.

Beyond that, improved transit can also improve air quality and decrease
energy consumption, but it is an expensive proposition because of door to
door travel times, marketing, public relations and so forth.

To compete with

highways, transit systems must be developed to provide fast and convenient
service between the home and the rider's destination, and at the same time
must produce a reasonable cash return for operating expenses.
In late 1973, city officials from the Twin Cities area expressed an
interest in participating in a new state-sponsored transit program called
"Dial-A-Ride Trnasportation" or DART.

These discussions led to the planning

and the implementation of a Dial-A-Ride system service throughout the Twin
Cities area.

As a result, the incorporation of the Twin Cities Area Transpor-

tation Authority came effective on July l, 1974.
For the first six months of operation, door to door Dial-A-Ride service was
available in the 15 square mile central core of the Twin Cities area.

An

origin and destination study of the bus riders was conducted during the first
four weeks of the Dial-A-Ride service for the St. Joseph, Fairplain, and Benton
Harbor zones (see Map VII-E).

Information on the average DART day was compared

to personal trip da t a for the same areas as recorded in the 1972 Origin and
Destination Trip Study (see Chart VII-F).
I/TT

1 "

�TWIN CITIES AREA

(

I

-

. .
.....
~

M

,
I

DIAL-A-RIDE ZONES

"

ZONE
BOUNDARIES

~

"'BEtfTO
lo

H

'

t.Ra

.

•'ST. JOSE

,

~~~~

~

~-• ,.,::...._itl:t~

~~~~ .~,~~~

't.1:-LS:':t~~

I

,.-.+-~1~1:··J

S

_,+J-~:~~=~~:I-~-

""

"' .
"'

{/ ' -:_:%~Cf.=?~I ' - --

/.
I

,,

... .' -~-P=

__,, ,~:::'-

';:, ·' '

\

- ,

:·:·:/
.
. -- ,'.

' : . \' ~

:

. '

,, ••

.

:·j

- r;

I

:: !"'·'"

I

•

- "::_...

'
)

1 '. ,

--!'

•'

. -

, c.

:

) , -.,L

. //,...-. i· '.. '
.

c'=·

}

.

D •r. ,: •!.o
(•fJ.~1--..
,

. . f. -· t

.

-

. .___.__

\

VII-11

•

~

i

·-•-w-

.

I Y&gt;
.,,,,,

... .
•

u--=·~
-7 -

~::
:

""-

-

�INTER-ZON E TRIPS
Ch~rt

v_q,...f

NORTH SHORE
Population 4015
Density
l 606/m~ 2
Area
2.5 mi
IntraZonal
Trips
824· (½%)

BENTON HARBOR

ST. JOSEPH
:-,p~tion
.

~n~

- y

\rea
:tra•na l
rips

Population · 15480
Density
2048/mi 2
Area
7.56 mi 2
IntraZonal
Tdps
25695 {15%)

11084
2363/mi~
4.69 mi

FAIRPLAIN
Population 14500
Density
1859/m~ 2
Area
7.8 mi
IntraZonal
Trips ·
14697 (9%)

j

c::,·
C\J

•

V)
0)

•

•

•

•
•

•

•

•
•

~·

I

;:: I
I

~•

~I
~I

LINCOLN
/'""'\

LINCOLN
Population 18870
Density
1864/m/
Area
10.125 mi 2
IntraZona 1
Trips
22504 {13%)

TOTAL:
Population 63949 ·
· Density
l957/mi 2
Area
32.675 mi 2
Trips
168820
Trips into
St. Joseph 46556 {28%)
Inter-zone trips (number and% of total trips) are enumerated along the lines connecting
1eir respective origin and destination zones.

.
.

Source:

A transit Development Program for

the Twin Cities Area Transportation
Authority
VII-12

�In the O &amp; D study of bus riders, a comparison was made between tre standard
trip patterns for all modes and the DART trip patterns (see Chart VII-G).

The

only unusual findings within the DART trip patterns occurred between the city
of St. Joseph and Benton Harbor.

The study showed a greater percentage of

total DART trips between the twin cities than normally occur by driving patterns.This occurrence can be explained by the fact that more residents of the
neighboring community are of lower income and are transportation poor.

There-

fore, they use the DART system to seek services and make purchases within

~

St. Joseph because of their new found mobility.
The report also highlights the fact that there is about a 1% mode split for
transit services in the area.* This mode split does not have a measurable
impact on the trip movements to and within the city's boundaries, although it
supplies services to the transit captives (the old, the poor, the physically
handicapped, etc.) within the Twin Cities area.

Other deficiencies identified

by the DART study include:
1.

Excessive waiting times.

2.

A disproportionate number of trips to certain zones relative to
general travel patterns for all modes.

3.

A lower than desirable portion of trips made for work pruposes.

On these results, it can be concluded that no measurable impact is being
accomplished by the present Dial-A-Ride system on the city's traffic flow
problem.

Therefore, traffic patterns on streets and highways within the city

continue to be congested and overcrowded, but the continuation and expansion
of the DART program could lead to a general alleviation of these problems
with additional ridership from the commuting public.

*Mode split is the percentage of total trips made on a particular transportation
mode {private auto, public transit, bicycling, etc.). A 1% split means that 100
trips were made on the Dial-A-Ride service during the same time period that
10,000 total trips were made in the area.
VII-13

�Chart VII-G
DART - O&amp;D TRIP PATTERNS

% of Total Core Area Trips

™

Standard Trip Patterns All Modes
DART Trip Patterns, October 1974

50

48

45
40
35
30
25

24

20
15

~-

.

-

10
5
0

BHR

SJO

FPL

""------v---------I

\

1nt ra-zone

BHR
SJO

BHR
SJO
FPL
FPL
\....__________ r-----...J'
V
Zone Pairs

BHR Benton Harbor
SJO St. Joseph
FPL Fairplain

.

'

Source:

VII-14

A Transit Development Program
for the Twin Cities Area
Transportation Authority

�WATER TRANSPORTATION
Water transportation and the supporting port facility in St. Joseph have
played an important role in the development of the economy for the St. Joseph
area.

From the earliest history of the area, this mode of transportation was

the main means of moving people and goods inland, and during the twentieth
century, the harbor supported the activities of ship building as well as water

,....

borne commercial and passenger traffic.
During recent years, the significance of this mode of transportation has
diminished significantly within the Twin Cities area.

Due to the advent of

modern roads and the recent upsurge of truck and truck-rail activity, harbor
activities have gradually diminished until only a few users utilize the
commercial water transportation available.

Basically, these users are involved

in the shipment of volume bulk commodities related primarily to the construction
trade.

The following chart is a comparison of product tonnage and the number

of cargos for the 1971 and 1974 harbor activities.
Comparative Port Activities for 1971 and 1974
MATERIALS

1974
Cargos

Tons

1971
Cargos

Tons

Aggregate

15

133,885

34

302,000

Salt

3

42,130

3

30,682

Limestone

8

92,337

9

76,605

22

92,802

30

134,232

6

14,501

24

80,459

54

375,655

100

623,978

Cement
Petro Products

As can be noted by this comparison, the 1974 totals are 40% lower than the
gross tonnage shipment in 1971.

This condition can be directly related to

the fact that the construction business during this era has been in a depressed
VII-15

�state.

To increase harbor activity to the 1971 levels, diversification of

types of materials shipped would need to be encouraged; and new firms not
now using water• transportation would have to be attracted and be made aware
of this mode to better utilize the existing port facilities.
In recent months, future recreational facilities have been proposed by the
cities of Benton Harbor, St. Joseph, and St. Joseph Township.

In total,

these facilities would tend to double the existing recreational capacity of
the port.

Hence, this activity or additional commercial port use will lead

to more car and truck traffic on the existing harbor frontage of St. Joseph.
Inadequacies of the existing street system with the addition of new activities
can only increase congestion within the already highly intensive activity
center adjacent to the central business district area.

Therefore, under the

existing trends of the area, increased commercial or recreational facilities
will be heavily dependent on road improvements in the city.
BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION
The early 1970's experienced a bicycle boom of which the effect is still
being felt across the nation.

The increased popularity of the bicycle as

both a recreational and a utilitarian mode of transportation dictates that
greater provisions be made for bicycles within the St. Joseph area.

This

statement is predicated on the fact that 16 million bicycles were sold in the
United States in 1973 as compared with 11.5 million cars sold in the same year.
The Bicycle Institute estimates that one person in three now owns a bicycle and
that by 1978 one person in two will own one.

The Bicycle Institute estimates,

if projected for the St. Joseph area, would indicate that there are approximately
r

r

3,773 bicycle riders now using the street system within the city, and that by
1978 we can expect an increase in ridership by 1,900 additional riders.

These

increased sales will lead to demands for more non-motorized transportation planning
in the city.

vr r , ~

�But there are several major deterrents that make bicycling next to impossible
for various segments of the population within the city.

Bicycling requires

generally good health in order to keep up a respectable pace for any distance.
(This factor might rule out the use of the bicycle by some of the elderly
although the bicycle or an adult tricycle could serve as therapy for others)
Inclement weather restricts many bicycling trips, and darkness proposes many
safety related problems.

The present lack of adequate bicycling facilities

also limits the use of bicycle and separate bikeway construction is often a
low priority item in local budgets.

h

The present lack of bicycle security

also serves as a deterrent to many cyclists.

For example, bicycling through

a shopping arta appears to be promising but the lack of adequate anti-theft
measures makes cycling to these areas risky.
In spite of these adversities, it appears that nationally and locally,
bicycle ridership is still increasing.

Therefore, considerable safety and

health problems exist when non-motorized vehicles share the rights-of-way with
vehicular traffic.

Assuming that the city of St. Joseph is following the

national trend, there is more danger on local streets within the city than
many of . the surrounding communities because of the high concentration of
vehicular trips into and within the city proper of St. Joseph.

As referred

to earlier in this report, 48% of the total trips made in the area are made
within the confines of the city limits of St. Joseph.

This fact, on top of

the fact of the congested areas and filtering of automobile traffic onto
residential streets increases

the potential of bicycle accidents within the

city, suggests a need to look further into the non-motorized situation in
St. Joseph and make provisions to alleviate potential problems before they take
their toll.

VII-17

-

�SUMMARY
The results of the 1972 Origin and Destination Study for the Twin Cities area
indicate thai more trips are made into, within and through the city of St.
Joseph than any other community in the Twin Cities area.

This concentration

of trips has led to congestion problems in the southtown and downtown business
areas.

As a result of the existing congestion on St. Joseph's road system

it has been projected that traffic and congestion will increase on the main
arteries of the city causing commuter traffic to filter into residential
neighborhoods, which would result in a gradual grinding down and deterioration
of prime residential areas.
The availability of transit as it now exists in the Twin Cities area has very
little impact on reducing the number of vehicle trips made within the city.
Therefore, additional improvements and a preferential transit policy are
needed to achieve any significant impact on lessening vehicle use within St.
Joseph.
The de-emphasis of water transportation within the city has also led to a
greater use of truck and the street system within the city.

•
._

This additional

use has led to the need for better roads to handle pay loads by trucks in the
area.
The new popularity of bicycle travel for recreational and utilitarian purposes
has also led to unsafe hazardous conditions for both motorist and cyclers on
the already congested streets of the city.

If the popularity for this mode of

transportation continues, there will be a need to improve the existing facilities
and ma.ke them safer for the cyclist of transportation, therefore the following
goals and objectives are recommended:

VII-18
-

-

------

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
..,_

Goals:
l.

Develop a balanced transportation system.

2.

Enhance the economical and environmental values of the community.

3.

Increase accessibility to centers of activities and employment.

4.

Develop a safe transportation system.

Objectives:
l.

Identify problems in the existing transportation system.

2.

Give greater attention to the planning of port, pedestrian, cycling, and
other transportation modes.

3.

Coordinate planning of transportation and land uses more efficiently.

4.

Make better and more complete use of existing road beds, utility rights-of-way,
terminals and other existing facilities.

5.

Improve service to major commercial and employment centers.

6.

Develop alternatives to improve congested and high accidents areas.

7.

Reduce vehicular traffic on local and residential streets.

8.

Minimize transportation related accidents.

VII-19

~

�VI I I.

RECOMMENDATIONS

In the preceding seven sections, a number of opportunities and problems that
the City of St. Joseph is presently facing and will face in the future have
been raised.

It is the purpose of this section to suggest possible direction

for these future opportunities and suggestions for the existing problems.
These recommendations were developed jointly by the St. Joseph City Planning
Commission and the staff of the Southwestern Michigan Regional Planning
Commission with final review and approval resting with the city planning
commission.

A.

FUTURE LANO USE
1.

SUBSTANTIALLY Rl!7DUCE THE MULTI-FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY AREAS IN THE
CITY.
(Map VIII-A)

A comparison of the 1953 and 1975 Land Use Surveys for St. Joseph
(Section II, Table II-C) indicates a 210% increase in residential
two family acreage, a 187% increase in multi-family acreage, and a
19% increase in residential sin9le-family acreage over the 22 year

period.

Between 1960 and 1970 (Section III, Graph III-A) the total

number of rental occupied housing units in St. Joseph increased by
26% while the city's total number of owner occupied housing units

decreased by 4%.

The 1974 R. L. Polk Profiles of Change indicates a

continuation of this trend, in that between 1973 and 1974 the total
number of rental occupied units within the city increased by 13%
while the total number of owner occupied housing units increased by

-

•.

merely 3%.

This increase in rental housing units correlates

positively with the previously mentioned increase in multi-family

r

VIII-l

�-

.

'·

housing units in that 60% of St. Joseph's 1974 rental housing units

'·

were in multi-family structures.
Presently, less than 50% of the city's two family and multi-family
zoned land, in the older portions of the city, is occupied by two
family and multi-family uses.

A majority of this land is presently

occupied by single-family residential structures.

The 1975 Land Use

Survey indicates a minimal amount of single-family residentially zonef;ti. _
land available for development in the city.

Therefore, if all the

single-family residential structures in the present two family and
multi-family zone were to be converted or removed and replaced by the
highest use allowed in their respective zone, there would be a dramatic
shift in the single-family/multi-family, owner occupied/renter occupied
household composition of the city.
Reduction in the quantity of proposed two family and multi-family land
in the older portion of St. Joseph would substantially curtail
conversions of single-family housing units in this area, thereby
stabilizing the single-family/multi-family, owner occupied/renter
occupied household composition of the city.
2.

ELIMINATE flo/DUSTRIAL USES IN THE SILVER BEACH AREA AND PROVIDE FOR
USES Tll/1..T ARE ORIENTED TO THE BEACH AREA AND I'l.'S RECREATIONAL
POTENTIAL.
(Map VIII-A)

The city of St. Joseph has two major unique natural features, one
being its Lake Michigan shoreline and the other being the St. Joseph
River.

The Silver Beach area which combines the assets of both of

these unique natural features is an extremely aesthetic area with
significant recreational potential.

However, Silver Beach's present

land uses consist of a vacant partly demolished amusement park, a
VII I-2

�few residential structures (of reasonable quality), a number of
heavy and light industries, and a vacant parcel of land.

This

area's . aesthetic appeal and potential for future recreational
related development is therefore severely hindered as discussed in
Section II by incompatible industrial uses within the Silver Beach
area.

Steps should be taken to assure the relocation of tnese

incompatible industries within the city.
Elimination of industrially zoned land in the Silver Beach area would
preclude future industrial development on the vacant Whirlpool and

II

amusement park properties and would establish existing industrial
I

uses as nonconforming, encouraging a more logical development of the

II

area.

11

3.

DISCOURAGE AND WHERE POSSIBLE, ELIMINATE STRIP COMM8RCIAL DEVELOPMENT
AWNG SOUTH NILES AVENUE.
(Map VIII-A)

The haphazard strip commercial development of Niles Avenue has caused
numerous irreconcilable development problems for the city.

This

strip commercial development hinders traffic movement on Niles
I

Avenue, produces conflicts with adjacent residential neighborhoods,
and is very aesthetically unpleasing.
The south Niles Avenue area is the second largest commercial area in
St. Joseph and is therefore in direct competition with downtown St.
Joseph for commercial development.

The continued expansion of

commercial uses in south St. Joseph will have numerous adverse
effects on adjacent nei9hborhoods, Niles Avenue traffic, and downtown St. Joseph's commercial prosperity.

VI II-3

�-

-

- ---- - _,

)

)

,..__.

__,.,_ .

CITY OF

SAINT JOSEPH
BERRIEN

COUNTY

MICHIGAN

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
LEGEND;

RESIDENTIAL SINGLE nAMILY
RESIDENTIAL TWO FAMILY
I

► -

.. .-c'fUf's'--&lt; · . ....

RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY

I

~

COMMERCIAL WHOLESALE &amp; RETAIL

,,, •. ,.

COMMERCIAL PERSONAL BUSINESS

, ·. ]

&amp;

~#m

INDUSTRIAL

~

WATER-RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

k~i:~i~If21

PARK

1~~1j1j1~1~1~I~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~l

CIVIC &amp; INSTITUTIONAL

'fl iii ii I

&amp;

PROFESSIONAL SERV
{'

fr.

....... . .....
c,_, , •'

- ))'f'--~ "'~ ' l ! ( ~ . , . ,....~ __ .,,,.,.,._. "

OPEN SPACE

.,.., _--.u:u

. -~IVFR

((r

--

•

•~ ,

( l ~ ~ ~ . ·--- ' "'~·

,.,,~
~;
¾
~,
£
s1~1~~ · ~

.

,ri - ' ;

r

~~o

~crli~ar

~c~J.

,~,,

6'&amp;~T,~

□

:::_•

c:__J

;-:-:+:=·
~

•

ti_~(

CJI

,;1i~- .,

;i;:::::,:-:"-~~r.e-~·c~

r.&gt;

\- - .

_ •.f . ,

~ t!-.;~m
_ r
&lt;.L t-.

Jl L---'!Li ,. ;:~(..

-

-~~DD
c= :".c,::,_~V:..
□D
[:::_l L
~--~ -

.~

.. r::..::·Jr--7~
·; '-;.,.~ r--,1;•,.-.

· r::.J C_~ ~-:':-'·•C'.-

•I • ·.

.r

;.~(i&lt;q~ ~ ·,

~;---: ,-~ N,r:--s-,,--, ~ ~·· ~.. -'~kl~
~ / ~,:?·:~{?½~ ·.
wr.J c
c · -~
1

l :h'r-Hfl.'l'i'N

1

-

~ -

,.

~/
~,'
'
~,

j L~

::J

'J_ .... I
,

7
tltj ~.. ''W''~~~f
.
---,
n _·

~

=!=~==

J.'f;..•: .-,

r-i

-~.ii:=··

r-,

t]

(.)

~

};-~ □

'

~~~□
~□OD
~ ·[.__,_....__I DD
~c:._:i
i

~
()

~

'

1···-··:·

&lt;
I

""

-----

.- V
1

Cc,

@l

5T, JOSEPH TOWNSHIP

~
~
•❖•

"

-,~: '"l~;,~l&gt; ,.... I" I

(8
~ ~ · Flafiona Plermg

t

~-c.--•
...,.
_ _c...wv.-.....,_

=I

eo.,.,..,, ~

'l'iKJ7 OMolcr, S!,MI · S l . ~_~49086 · 11111phor,e616/1183·1529

N

lllwtMfl

I

I

l

l

�B.

HOUSING
1.

ASSIST PROPERTY OWNERS (SPECIFICALLY ELDERLY) TO MAINTAIN THE OLDER
HOMES IN NEIGHBORHOODS 4 AND 6 •

•
Section Vindicates that St. Joseph neighborhoods 4 and 6 have the

highest potential for housing problems in the city.

This conclusion

is based upon analysis of the city's respective neighborhoods by a
number of housing indicators such as owner/rental composition, singlefamily/multi-family composition, vacancy rates (one and two canvass),
and transiency rates.

These key housing indicators were provided by

the 1974 R. L. Polk Profiles of Change.
The City of St. Joseph has a comparatively high concentration of
elderly residents as illustrated in a comparison of the city's
population distribution with that of Berrien County and the State of
Michigan (Section I, Graph I-A).

The 1974 R. L. Polk Survey identifies

neighborhoods 4 and 6 as having major concentrations of retired heads
of household.

The total composition of the city's retired heads of

household is approximately 100% above the national average while in
neighborhoods 4 and 6 retired heads of household concentrations are
approximately 150% and 400% respectively above the national average.
The R. L. Polk data also indicates that the average income of
neighborhoods 4 and 6 is substantially below the remainder of the
city, presumably attributed to the high concentration of retired heads
of household on fixed incomes within these neighbhorhoods.
'. -

Provision of housing assistance to St. Joseph's elderly low income
property owners in neighborhoods 4 and 6 would encourage housing
stability within these neighborhoods.

VIII-5

�2.

VIGOROUSLY CONTINUE THE CITY'S EXISTING CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAJ.1.

The older residential portion of St. Joseph is located in
neighborhoods 3, 4, 6, and 7 which collectively comprise 35% of the
city's total housing units.

As indicated in Section III, these

neighborhoods collectively contain 74% of the city's identified substandard housing.

These neighborhoods also contain 60% of the city's

total rental housing units.

The high concentration of rental housing

units and incidence of the substandard housing units in these older

~

residential neighborhoods of St. Joseph provide a breeding ground for
the growth of the "absentee slum landlord" syndrome.
Vigorous continuation of the city's existing code enforcement
program directed at income producing property in neighborhoods 3, 4,
6, and 7 will preclude potential expansion in the number of substandard
income producing housing units in the city's older neighborhoods.

VIII-6

-

�C.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1.

ORGANIZE A TWIN CITIES PORT COMMISSION M.fD INVESTIGATE THE POTENTIAL
FOR PORT VEVELOPMENT IN ST. JOSEPH (POSSIBLY ON INDUSTRIAL ISLAND)
THROUGH A COMPREHENSIVE HARBOR PLAN.

The city's 1964 Comprehensive Plan prepared by Barton-Aschman and
Assoc. recommended the development of industrial-related activities
on Industrial Island.

Section VII of this report also reviews the

potential for development of port and warehousing facilities in
St. Joseph.

A comparison of this report's 1975 existing land use

survey and the city's existing zoning map indicates that there is a
minimal amount of land within the city, other than Industrial Island
presently available for industrial development.
The Berrien County Planning Commission recently prepared a report
reviewing the potential for waterways and water transportation
facilities in the Twin Cities.

This report predominantly reviewed

the feasibility of development of a 32-acre parcel of land on
Industrial Island east of Industrial Avenue and north of the sewage
treatment plant as a port and related facilities development.

It

was recommended by the report that a Twin Cities Harbor Commission
be organized and that a long range comprehensive harbor plan be
developed.
The development of a port facility on Industrial Island would provide
an ideal site for the relocation of water-related industries that
this report previously recommended be removed from Silver Beach.
Development of a new port and related facilities on the St. Joseph
River at St. Joseph would have significant positive economic effects
on the entire Twin Cities area and would offer an excellent relocation

.

site for a number of those Silver Beach industries proposed for
relocation .

�0.

PARKS ANO RECREATION
1.

CONTINUED ACQUISITION OF VACANT LAKE FRONTAGE PROPERTY ALONG LAKE
SHORE DRIVE.

St. Joseph's 1964 General Plan prepared by Barton-Aschman and
Assoc. proposed that the Lake Michigan frontage south of Hilltop
Road and west of Lake Shore Drive be used in a recreational form.
The 1975 Land Use Survey (Section II) indicates that a substantial
portion of the aforementioned land is presently unused assumedly
through erosion related circumstances.
Section V determined that the city presently has sufficient recreational
lands to meet the present and future recreational needs of its residents;
however, it does suggest the acquisition of unique recreational lands."
11

Such acquisition could tie in with the city's existing Lookout Scenic
Park.

Public acquisition of lake frontage property along Lake Shore Drive
would permanently preserve that unique scenic vista of Lake Michigan
for all residents of St. Joseph.

2.

CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SIL VER BEACH AREA TO ASSURE PUBLIC
ACCESS TO LAKE MICHIGAN'S BEACH FRONTAGE.

St. Joseph's 1964 General Plan prepared by Barton-Aschman and Assoc.
recommended

11

development of the lake frontage south of the St. Joseph

River mouth into a recreational center which could include beach and
park facilities."

The 1975 Land Use Survey (Section II) indicates

that a substantial portion of the aforementioned land is presently
unused.

One of the recommendations under the Land Use section of

this report is the redevelopment of Silver Beach with lake oriented
uses, which would allow for the public dedication of beach frontage.
VII I-8

•

�Section V determined that the city presently has sufficient
recreational lands to meet the present and future recreational
needs of its residents; however, it does suggest "the acquisition
of uni~ue recreational land.

11

Public dedication of a portion of the Silver Beach lake frontage
II

II

would reserve this unique recreational area of Lake Michigin for
use by the residents of St. Joseph.

II

1,

•

VIII-9

�E.

PUBLIC FACILITIES AND UTILITIES
1.

SEPARATION OF THE CITY'S REJ-1AINING COMBINED STORM AND SANITARY SEWER
LINES.

Section VI indicates that the city presently has underway a program
to separate its combined storm sewer lines west of Main Street.
However, there still remains a number of combined storm and sanitary
sewer lines east of Main and Niles.

It is anticipated that

regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the

~ --

Michigan Department of Natural Resources will necessitate a remedy to
the city's existing combined sewer problems.

,,,--.....

VIII-10

-

�F.

TRANSPORTATION
1.

DEVELOP A STREE'T CLASSIFICATION SYST8M TO DESIGNATE PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS,
MINOR ARTERIALS, COLLECTOR AND LOCAL STREETS v/ITHIN THE CITY OF ST.
JOSEPH .'

As was explained in Section VII,

there is an interrelationship between

land use and transportation systems.

This is made evident by the fact

that different traffic intensities produce pressures for various
incompatible land uses within the City of St. Joseph.

Therefore, a

functional classification system is recommended to define the type of
traffic flow desired for any particular street within the city.

By

using this system, we would be able to better control and understand
the flow of traffic through the city, and design a system to maintain
desired land uses throughout the community (Map VTI-A).
The four classifications of street systems recommended are:
a.

Principal Arterial Streets
This system of streets and highways serves the major centers of
activity, the highest traffic volume corridors and the longest
trip desires within the city boundaries. These streets would be
integrated with other connecting arterials, collectors and local
streets indicating their hierarchy of importance.

b.
•

Minor Arterial Streets
The minor arterial street system should inter-connect with and
augment the principal arterial system and provide service trips
of moderate length at a somewhat lower level of travel mobility
than major arterials.

c.

Collector Street System
The collector street system provides both access to and circulation
in residential neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas. It
differs from the preceding arterial street systems in that
facilities on the collector system may penetrate residential
neighborhoods, distributing trips from arterials through the area
to the driver's ultimate destination. The collector streets also
attract traffic from residential neighborhoods and channel it into
the arterial system.

VIII-11

�I

I

)

)

(

CITY OF

SAINT JOSEPH
BERRIEN

COUNTY

MICHIGAN

PROPOSED STREET
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

~~Aln

LEGEND
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL

e111111••

MINOR ARTERIAL

•---■

/ // ,.f ··

COLLECTOR STREET

J

i:=·
. ...:·

ff

~(~_r

A-••~ ... ,_,.,

1/t ~P,

1;'

',f:Jr
~).~~l:&lt;I ·.

-\)\ \.:

~

~

b~ · 1/-:
/JI{/

/1

~

J1

.

.

I0,_//'..

✓/'· d'•

3~1r

r-~ /

-, ~-.,

. _) _
;
r

.

~

.

.

-,\

!~ , \,. ,.,

:if - -ll
.
~

-·

.. -

'a\

.~ .

I ..·
•·.

.,.. 1\~

.
I

_,-

\

;

-

-· 1I:

8 JLE-J:_ ✓f: ~~ .: :

~ jjb

---r~- 1

~
~

_

1J'1fnh··

(!)

'
~
I;,)

~

'

I - -9:-c.-,. I

:Jl ~

&lt;

\

i0D1 (
j ~

"---"-'--1•ur

3~
i l--

El-'- :IP.Ip

- I L'. • -

(i - - - - -

I
tv

~

~

l~1=-1- 1--

~

(9

"

SoutfMiNlllm IWcHg8n R9giofwl Pia• 1l11g Cuc1 ■ 1 ilalor'I _..

---- --- - -

'I

''
'I

'Rf1T ~SlrNt · Sl-bllllt\.~49086

---.-~ .
...._c;.. ... ...........

'------"

'-'

-s

......

· llllo!Jl'a,e6161983·1529

f

I I

I

�d.

Local Street System
The local street system encompasses all facilities not in one of
the higher systems. It serves to provide direct access to the
higher order of streets. It offers the lowest level of mobility
• and excessive traffic movement is deliberately discouraged on
this street system.

It is hoped that by adopting a street classification system a better
control of traffic through and within the City of St. Joseph can be
developed in an effort to coordinate traffic flow patterns with
desired land use patterns.
2.

DEVELOP BETTER ARTERIAL TRAFFIC FLOW WITHIN THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH.

In Section VII

and in the recommendations for neighborhood

preservation, comments on the intrusion of residential neighborhoods
by vehicle operators seeking shorter routes was

noted.

This

situation is due to the congestion being developed on the major
arterials (i.e., Napier, Niles, Main, and Hilltop).

A policy of only

creating hindrances to developing traffic patterns through residential
neighborhoods will not reach the desired level of control, if the major
arterial streets creating this situation are not improved at the same
time.
a.

Therefore, it is recommended that:

Napier Avenue be widened to four lanes from Riverwood Terrace to
Niles Avenue to improve arterial traffic movement on this street.
This arterial is presently more than 150% over capacity.

It is

noted that this arterial is primarily a residential street; but
because of traffic flows through the area, it is recommended
that this street be widened rather than redirecting traffic onto
the primarily residential Langley Avenue.

VIII-13

�b.

Allow right turn on blinking red arrows off Napier Avenue onto
Niles Avenue and off Niles Avenue onto Napier Avenue and redesion
the intersection for easier tur~i!!_g movements.

It is recognized

that there is legislation pending in Lansing to allow these right
turn movements on arterial streets, but since legislation is not
assured of passage, this recommendation is made to allow easier
traffic movement for people traveling these two major arterials.
c.

Widen Niles Avenue from Winchester Street to Main Street and the
intersection at Niles Avenue and Main Street.

This would allow

an easier turninq_~ovement of traffic trying to flow into Main
Street from Niles Avenue or from Main Street onto Niles Avenue.
This rechannelization of traffic must be coupled with improved
traffic signaling to allow greater volumes of traffic to flow off
Niles Avenue onto Main Street during the morning and afternoon
peak hours.
d.

Another recommended arterial improvement is to provide a physical
divider of the type which now exist on Main Street from St. Joseph
Drive to Napier Avenue on Niles Avenue.

It is seen that this type

,-......

of barrier would improve the aesthetic quality of the southtown
areas as well as establish preferred channelization movements of
traffic making left hand turns to get to a desired destination.
Rear entrance routes on one-way alleys could be established for
better access to middle of block traffic attractors so as not to
hinder businesses already located on Niles Avenue.
....,

e.

The last recommended arterial improvement is to widen the intersection
at Cleveland Avenue and Hilltop Road with overhead signaling and a

..,
I

general widening of Hilltop Road from two to four lanes.

-

This is

�another area which is reaching critical proportions of overcongestion and is encouraging vehicle operators to seek alternative
routes through residential areas.
With the implementation of these recommended improvements, it is foreseen that better arterial movement will occur entering and exiting
the city.

Coordinating these improvements with a signing program

will discourage thru-traffic flow on local streets which is not
wanted by the residents living in the impacted areas.
3.

CONSTRUCTION OF LIMITED ACCESS CROSSTOWN CONNECTOR TO ROUTE TRAFFIC
MORE E'FFICIENTLY TO f.1AJOR CENTERS OF ACTIVITY.

It is recognized that a crosstown connector at this time is a volatile
issue with many residents of St. Joseph, but it is also seen that the
development of a limited access facility is the most reasonable
solution to the long term traffic congestion and neighborhood eroding
problems of the city.

Therefore, it is recommended that a crosstown

connector along the river route as well as the alternative route along
Niles be studied to determine the most economically and environmentally
feasible route for implementation.
A crosstown connector can alleviate the problem of serving the major
activity centers.

It has a secondary effect of preventing the erosion

of older neighborhoods within the city because of the intrusion of
traffic trying to avoid the congested areas, and will integrate well
with the present downtown development plans.
4.

THERE SHOULD BE AN INTRODUCTION OF BUS SHELTERS AND IMPROVED SERVICE
INCENTIVE8 (BIY.E RACKS AND PARCEL STORAGE ARE/IS) '1.'O ENCOURAGE THE USE
OF TRANSrt'.

As noted in Section VII,

the Dial-A-Ride system as it exists, has

more potential than its present ridership indicates.
VIIl-15

Therefore, the

�development of improved facilities for transit users such as bus
shelters in the major activity centers, as the downtown area, should
be developed.

Other transit improvements such as bike racks on Dial-

A-Ride vehicles and storage areas of groceries and packages would
also serve as an incentive for potential transit users to use Dial-ARide systems rather than private autos.
Adopting a policy to improve transit facilities and encourage its use

~

would help alleviate parking problems and congestion in the city's
major retail center.

This type of transit policy would prove less

costly than the construction of new parking facilities in the central
business district (CBD) and could .be easily coordinated with the downtown development plan.
5.

AN IMPROVED BIKEWAY AND PEDt:STRIAN WALKWAY SYSTEM SHOULD BE INTRODUCED
WITHIN THE CITY.

In Section VII,

increased popularity of bicycles as a recreational and

utilitarian vehicle was discussed.

This increase in popularity, and

recent court rulings recognizing the bicyclist's right to travel on
public roadways has dictated that provisions be made to devise a
comprehensive route system throughout the city before serious problem
develop.

Therefore, it is recommended that a signing program be

developed to identify streets of low traffic volumes to encourage
cyclists to travel these designated routes to reach an ultimate
destination.
A signing and lining program is also encouraged on collector and minor
arterial streets to delineate particular portions of road right-of-way
for bike riders.

Provision should be made for improved and separated

cycling and pedestrian pathways on primary arterial streets especially

'i

in the CBD.

..,

VIII-16

�It is understood that to immediately implement the recommended
program would disturb parking provisions and the availability of
road way for automobile traffic.

Therefore, it is recommended that

•

a gradual phasing of bike routes into existence take place in coordination
with street improvement projects for the city.

This type of attack on

the problem is recommended to lower cost of building a facility with
dual uses rather than separate more costly facilities.
The most critical area for implementation of these recommendations is
the downtown retail center.

With improved pedestrian and traffic

\

circulation and improved transit ridership, the downtown area would
become a more improved area to shop and work in.

The comprehensive

adoption of the recommendations would ensure the stability of the
city's residential and central business district by directing the
desired flow of traffic to the proper land uses.

VIII-17

�-

_,

G.

NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION
1.

PROVIDE INCREASED STREET SIGNING IN ST. JOSE'PH 'S SOUTHEASTERN
RESIDENTIAL AREA (BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY NAPIER AVENUE AND THE
WEST BY NILES AVENUE).

2.

CLOSE ST. JOSEPH DRIVE AND LESTER AVENUE.

As indicated in Section VII, Napier Avenue between Langley Avenue and
Niles Avenue is presently more than 50% over capacity and Niles
Avenue between St. Joseph Drive and Napier Avenue is projected to be
25-50% over capacity by the year 2000.

~

In 1972, these segments of

Napier and Niles Avenues carried traffic volumes of 28,100 and 24,400
vehicles per day respectively.
As stated in Section VII, "motorists (thru-traffic) when traveling
between two points will seek the path of least resistance. 11 Therefore,
as traffic volumes and other traffic hindrances

increase on Niles and
• I

Napier Avenues, thru-traffic will attempt to find alternative, faster
routes.

Increasing numbers of frustrated vehicle operators have re-

routed themselves off of Niles and Napier Avenues through the residential
neighborhoods south of Napier Avenue and east of Niles Avenue.

Sections

II and VII discuss the adverse effects caused by such intrusion of thrutraffic onto residential streets.
If these alternative residential routes were removed or if their
desirability were significantly diminished by traffic hindrances,

the

operator's perception of the path of least resistance would return to
the designated primary arteries (Niles Avenue and Napier Avenue).
Therefore, if the alternative residential routes were eliminated or
if traffic signs were placed on them, a significant portion of the
traffic invasion into southeastern St. Joseph's residential neighborhoods would be alleviated.

VIII-18

�A generous disbursement of four-way stop signs throughout the area
in question and the closing of Lester Avenue and St. Joseph Drive
would adequately discourage the intrusion of thru-traffic onto St.
Joseph's southeastern residential streets thereby preserving its
residential character.
3.

PROVIDE INCREASED STREET SIGNING ON LANGLEY A VENUE.

4.

DO NOT MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NAPIER AVENUE-LANGLEY A VENUE INTERSECTION THAT f.lOULD FACILITATE THE USE: OF LANGLEY AVENUE.

As indicated in Section VII, Napier Avenue between Langley and Niles
Avenues is presently more than 50% over capacity and Main Street
between Niles Avenue and Port Street is presently 0-25% over capacity.
It is projected that by the year 2000, the aforementioned segment of
Main Street and Niles Avenue between Napier Avenue and Main Street
will have become 25-50% over capacity while Napier Avenue will have
remained 50% over capacity.

In 1972, the aforementioned segments of

Napier Avenue, Main Street, and Niles Avenue carried traffic volumes
of 28,100, 27,000, and 14,000 vehicles per day respectively.

In 1972,

Langley Avenue between Napier Avenue and Wayne Street carried a

•

traffic volume of 9,700 vehicles per day .
This present over-capacity of Napier Avenue and Main Street has diverted
a significant amount of thru-traffic off the Napier Avenue to Nile~
Avenue to Main Street route through St. Joseph onto the Napier Avenue
to L~ngley Avenue to Wayne Street or Broad Street route through the
city.

Thru-traffic motorists perceive the Langley Avenue route to be

superior because of the absence of congestion or traffic hindrances
along Langley Avenue when compared with the Napier Avenue to Niles
Avenue to Main Street route.

Therefore, it is anticipated that as

VIII-19

�congestion continues to mount along Napier Avenue, Niles Avenue,
and Main Street, more and more thru-traffic motorists will choose
Langley Avenue as an alternate route through the city.
As indicated in Section II, land use along Langley Avenue between
Napier Avenue and Wayne Street is predominantly residential in
character.

Sections II and VII discuss the adverse effects upon

adjacent land uses by the transition of residential streets into
major arterial thru-streets.
A reduction of the speed limit to 25 MPH, the disallowing of heavy
trucks, and the non-improvement of the Langley and Napier Avenues
intersection would curtail the diversion of thru-traffic from the
Napier Avenue to Niles Avenue to Main Street route through St. Joseph
onto the Langley Avenue route.
5.

PROVIDE INCREASED STREET SIGNING ON STATE STREET AND LAKEVIEW AVENUE.

As previously discussed, when a major thru-street within the city
becomes congested, motorists attempt to find alternative thru-pathways which they feel will move them more expediantly.
The congestion which has occurred on Niles Avenue has encouraged thrutraffic motorists to find alternative routes through the city.

It has

been observed that a significant portion of the dislocated Niles
Avenue thru-traffic has appeared on South State Street and Lakeview
Avenue.
As indicated in Section II, Map II-8, the land use along State Street
between Midway and Main Streets and Lakeview between Hilltop Road and
Main Street is predominantly residential in character.
VIII-20

....,

-

�Sections II and VII discuss the adverse effects accrued upon adjacent
residential land uses

by

the transition of a residential street into

a •major arterial thru-street .
The provision of stop signs along State Street and Lakeview
Avenue would curtail the diversion of thru-traffic from Niles Avenue
onto State Street and Lakeview Avenue .

•
VIII-21

�---

I
H.

ORDINANCES
1.

SUBSTANTIALLY REVISE THE CITY'S EXISTING ZONING MAP, ZONING ORDINANCE
AND SIGN ORDINANCE, AND ESTABLISH CURB CUT REGULATIONS AND A SITE
PLAN REVIEh1 PROCESS.

A review of the city's existing zoning map and zoning ordinance and
sign ordinance in relation to the problems and recommendations set
forth in this report indicates that all are in need of extensive
revision.

It is presumed that curb cut regulations and a site plan

review process would have averted a number of the existing development
problems which were discussed in Section II.
A revision of the city's existing zoning map, zoning ordinance and
sign ordinance and the establishment of curb cut regulations and a
site plan review process is essential for implementation of the
recommendations

set forth in this report.

.....

1
VIII-22
~

-

-----

I

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010224">
                <text>St-Joseph_Comprehensive-Plan_1977</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010225">
                <text>City of St. Joseph Planning Commission, City of St. Joseph, Berrien County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010226">
                <text>1977-01-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010227">
                <text>City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010228">
                <text>The City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan was prepared by the City of St. Joseph Planning Commission with the technical assistance of the Southwestern Michigan Regional Planning Committee in August 1976 and was amended on January 6, 1977.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010229">
                <text>Southwestern Michigan Regional Planning Commission (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010230">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010231">
                <text>St. Joseph (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010232">
                <text>Berrien County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010233">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010235">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010236">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010237">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010238">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038447">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54844" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59114">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/09849fb6c510b9751b82280d1178139b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9dd99cedfc00dbbaa8f6790d7651486a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010567">
                    <text>��'FROM THE UBRA~Y Qr] .- ':
µ~-1! n' °" --.
A

:011 • . 'nCJ &amp;. zoning Center, \nC.

CITY OF
WILLIAMSTON
COMPREHENSIVE
~EXRLOPMENT
OCTOBER1978

PREPARED BY THE
CITY OF WILLIAMSTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
WITH THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

OF

TRI-COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMM.

~
AND

LAND PLANNING AND DESIGN ASSOC.

�FORWARD

THE PLANNING COMMISSION WISHES TO EXPRESS ITS SINCERE

THANKS TO ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS WHO ASSISTED IN
STUDIES AND PREPARATION OF MATERIAL FOR THIS COMPREHENSIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO LIST ALL WHO HELPED DURING THE
LONG PERIOD OF STUDY, BUT WE WANT ALL TO KNOW THAT THEIR
EFFORTS WERE DEEPLY APPRECIATED.
WITH THAT THOUGHT IN MIND, THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED TO
THOSE CIVIC-MINDED GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS.

WILLIAMSTON PLANNING COMMISSION

�A COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
CITY OF WILLIAMSTON, MICHIGAN
. TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE

INTRODUCTION .
HISTORICAL AND REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE
THE PEOPLE . . . . . . . . .
THE LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
THE BUILDINGS
THE PLAN FOR THE FUTURE
-

FUTURE LAND USE

-

TRANSPORTATION

-

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

-

.

2
5
9

•

•

•

•

17

•

29

•

•

47

•

•

48

•

•

•

•

53

•

•

•

•

57

DEVELOPMENT POLICIES

•

•

58

MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION

•

•

67

.

71

APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . .

MAPS
LOCATION MAP
2 - DRAINAGE
3 - SO I LS . .
4 - TOPOGRAPHY
5 - FLOODPLAIN
6 - EXISTING LAND USE
7 - RECREATION LANDS
a - WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
9 - SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEM
10 - TRANSPORTATION MAP
11 - FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP
12 - TRANSPORTATION PLAN MAP .
13 - COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLAN MAP
t

-

1

4

21
•

•

•

24

•

•

•

25

27
31

•

•

34

•

•

•

38

•

•

•

40
43

•

•

•

•

49

54
•

•

•

56

�INTRODUCTION
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF WILLIAMSTON HAS BEEN
PREPARED TO AID DECISION-MAKERS IN SHAPING THE PHYSICAL GROWTH OF
THE COMMUNITY.

IT IS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT CHANGES WILL

OCCUR IN THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AS A RESULT OF INCREASED
GROWTH AND THAT SUCH CHANGE CAN BE CHANNELED INTO AN ORDERLY,
ECONOMICAL, AESTHETIC AND HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT IF GIVEN PROPER
GUIDANCE.
THE PLAN IS BASED ON THE ATTAINMENT OF COMMUNITY GOALS WHICH
ORIGINATED IN THE THINKING OF VARIOUS CITIZENS AND PUBLIC
OFFICIALS CONCERNED WITH THE CITY'S FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND
WELFARE.

THESE GOALS AND RESULTANT POLICIES WILL PROVIDE THE

FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING NEW DEVELOPMENTS INTO THE EXISTING LAND
USE PATTERNS.
ON A LEVEL MORE PERSONAL THAN "INTEGRATING NEW DEVELOPMENTS INTO
THE EXISTING LAND USE PATTERNS," COMMUNITY PLANNING IS CONCERNED
WITH THE HOPES AND GOALS OF THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE
PROBLEMS CREATED BY PEOPLE LIVING CLOSELY TOGETHER.

COMMUNITY

PLANNING, TO BE EFFECTIVE, HAS TO EMBODY A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING
THAT IT IS INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE WHO BUILD THE COMMUNITY.

A HOUSE

OR A BUSINESS IS BUILT BECAUSE ONE INDIVIDUAL OR A DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY DECIDED TO INVEST IN THE COMMUNITY.

DECISIONS OF THIS

NATURE ARE MADE EVERY DAY AND EACH DECISION HAS AN AFFECT ON THE
TOTAL COMMUNITY OVER THE ENSUING YEARS.

IN MANY INSTANCES THE

DEVELOPER IS SELDOM AWARE OF OR DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THE LONGRANGE RAMIFICATIONS HIS CONSTRUCTION COULD PLACE UPON A CITY.
BECAUSE OF THIS HISTORIC LAISSEZ-FAIRE ATTITUDE, TOO MANY CITIES
HAVE GROWN UGLY,

INCONVENIENT, UNCOMFORTABLE AND EXPENSIVE TO

SERVE.
WILLIAMSTON CANNOT AFFORD THE LUXURY OF THIS ATTITUDE.

IF THE

CITY BECOMES UNSIGHTLY, FAMILIES WILL CHOOSE OTHER LOCATIONS IN
WHICH TO RESIDE.

IF TAXES BECOME TOO HIGH FOR THE BENEFITS THEY

BUY, BUSINESSES WILL LOOK ELSEWHERE.

IF THE SCHOOLS ARE

INADEQUATE, YOUNG FAMILIES WILL NOT MOVE IN.

2

IF A SEWER LINE

�GOES INTO THE WRONG AREA, THE CITY CANNOT AFFORD TO WRITE IT OFF.
WILLIAMSTON IS A SMALL COMMUNITY AND IF UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS
EXIST,

RESIDENTS CANNOT RUN TO ANOTHER PART OF TOWN.

IF THE

CITIZENS OF WILLIAMSTON PUT UP WITH INCONVENIENCE OR IGNORE
UNATTRACTIVE FEATURES BECAUSE OF HOMETOWN LOYALTY,

THEN IT CANNOT

BE REALISTICALLY ASSUMED THAT NEWCOMERS WILL FIND THE CITY
CONVENIENT OR ATTRACTIVE.
THIS PLAN INVESTIGATES MANY OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED FACTORS WHICH
CONSTITUTE A CITY.

POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FEATURES OF THESE

ITEMS, ALONG WITH OTHER IMPORTANT PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS,
ARE DOCUMENTED AND ANALYZED.

THEN, BY CAREFUL PLANNING, THE CITY

CAN BUILD UPON THE POSITIVE FEATURES AND WORK WITH THE SUGGESTED
POLICIES AND PROGRAMS TO HELP MINIMIZE THE EFFECTS OF PAST
DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS.

IT IS HOPED THAT THIS PLAN WILL BE USED IN

A SPIRIT WHICH WILL LEAD TO THE BETTERMENT OF WILLIAMSTON AND THE
LIVES OF ITS CITIZENS.

3

�LOCAi:iOn
Map I :Williamston City B Surrounding Communities
SHIAWASSEE

COUNTY

----~ WILLIAMSTOWN
TWP.

/

/

---

-... .........

I
I

/

'

I
I

✓

!•
/

----~-r-

--

''\

I
I

\

\

I

\

I

\

\

\

I

\

\
\

\

1

\

\
\

I

).

\

\

I

\•
I
I

\

\

\

I

\

\
\

I

"1'1:.MASON

\

\ _ ~ MILES

'-...

10 MILES

......._

I

I
I

/
/

I
I

..._
---

-- -- -- --

WHEATFIELD 1WP.

/

-.
- -- -- -- -_..,,,, /

1

LEROY

TWP.

\
\

\
\\15 MILES

\.

''

\
\

\.

...
►

Z1

..........

''

""

''

''

----------@@Will DANSVILLE

INGHAM
..........

.........

::&gt;

QI
0

........

..._

COUNTY

-- ----

,,,

STOCKBRIDGE

z
0

t4

l&amp;J

..........

---

JACKSON

----- --- -----

COUNTY

-- -- -

/

�HISTORICAL AND REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE
THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF WILLIAMSTON IS CONSTANTLY BEING
SHAPED AND MOLDED BY OUTSIDE FORCES--SURROUNDING CITIES, THE
COUNTY, THE STATE, THE NATION AND THE WORLD.

THESE INFLUENCES

TAKE MANY FORMS--ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL--AND CAN AFFECT
THE LONG-RANGE POPULATION COMPOSITION, EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
AND LAND USE PATTERNS IN THE CITY.

THIS SECTION OF THE PLAN FOR

WILLIAMSTON PRESENTS THE HISTORICAL EVENTS WHICH HAVE SHAPED THE
CITY INTO ITS PRESENT FORM AND ATTEMPT TO ASCERTAIN FORCES WHICH
WILL AFFECT IT DURING THE PLANNING PERIOD.
CITIES GROW AND FORM TO SERVE MANY DIVERSE FUNCTIONS IN A REGION.
AN URBAN CENTER WHICH IS ENDOWED WITH GOOD TRANSPORTATION
POTENTIAL,

ACCESS TO NATURAL RESOURCES AND AVAILABLE CAPITAL CAN

GROW INTO AN INDUSTRIAL CENTER.

OTHER COMMUNITIES, BECAUSE OF

THEIR PROXIMITY TO EMPLOYMENT CENTERS,
COMMUNITIES.

EVOLVE INTO BEDROOM

MANY COMMUNITIES START BY FORMING AROUND THE HUB OF

A SAWMILL OR A GRISTMILL PLACED TO SERVE INFANT AGRICULTURAL
ENTERPRISES.

THESE SETTLEMENTS GROW AND PROSPER, SERVING THE

SURROUNDING FARMS WITH BUSINESS SERVICES, AND FUNCTION AS
COLLECTION POINTS FOR GRAINS

AND LIVESTOCK.

MOST OF THESE

VILLAGES AND CITIES REACH AN OPTIMUM SIZE AND THEN CEASE TO GROW

I

WHEN A BALANCE IS REACHED BETWEEN ECONOMICAL TRANSPORTATION
DISTANCES FOR FARMERS TO OTHER COMPETING AGRICULTURAL COLLECTION
POINT SETTLEMENTS.

WHEN THIS EQUILIBRIUM IS REACHED,

IT REQUIRES

THE INTERVENTION OF OUTSIDE INFLUENCES TO REKINDLE GROWTH AND
CHANGE.
CONDITIONS SIMILAR TO THE ABOVE--AGRICULTURAL COLLECTION
SETTLEMENT--SHAPED WILLIAMSTON'S EARLY GROWTH.

THE FIRST

RECORDED SETTLERS, OTHER THAN THE TAWAS INDIAN TRIBE, WERE THE
BROTHERS PUTNAM--HIRAM AND JOSEPH.

THE PUTNAMS ARRIVED IN 1834

AND SETTLED ON THE NORTH BANK OF THE RED CEDAR RIVER NEAR THE
PRESENT PUTNAM STREET BRIDGE.
I

I

J
I

WITHIN FIVE YEARS THE PUTNAMS SOLD

THEIR LANDS TO THE WILLIAMS BROTHERS, WHO BUILT A DAM AND SAWMILL
IN 1840 AND A GRISTMILL IN 1842.

THEIR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

COINCIDED WITH THE OPENING OF A PLANK ROAD BETWEEN GRAND RAPIDS

5

�AND DETROIT.

THIS EVENT OPENED THE SETTLEMENT'S AGRICULTURAL

PRODUCTS TO WIDER MARKETS.

ANOTHER EVENT DURING THIS TIME SPAN--

THE LOCATION OF THE STATE CAPITOL AT LANSING IN 1847--ACCELERATED
THE GROWTH OF WILLIAMSTON.

BY 1871 TRAFFIC ALONG THE PLANK ROAD

AND GROWTH NEAR THE ORIGINAL SETTLEMENT REACHED THE MAGNITUDE TO
CONVINCE RESIDENTS THAT INCORPORATION OF WILLIAMSTON AS A VILLAGE
WAS NECESSARY.

APRIL 5,

1871 WAS THE DATE WHEN WILLIAMSTON

BECAME A LEGAL ENTITY.
1871 WAS AN IMPORTANT YEAR IN ANOTHER RESPECT.
RAILROAD SERVICE WAS PROVIDED TO THE VILLAGE.

DURING THAT YEAR
THIS FIRMED UP THE

POSITION WHICH WILLIAMSTON HELD AS THE DISTRIBUTION POINT FOR
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS GROWN IN SURROUNDING AREAS.
BY 1880 WILLIAMSTON HAD 892 RESIDENTS.

BESIDES THE AGRICULTURAL

DISTRIBUTION SERVICES THE VILLAGE PROVIDED TO SURROUNDING FARMS,
A BANK, NEWSPAPER AND HOTELS SERVED BOTH RESIDENTS AND TRAVELERS.
THE NEXT 40 YEARS INDICATES THE EQUILIBRIUM STAGE OF WILLIAMSTON
AS AN AGRICULTURE-SERVING COMMUNITY.
1,060.

THE POPULATION IN 1920 WAS

THE AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITY CLEARED AND CULTIVATED THEIR

OPTIMUM ACREAGE TO MEET POPULATION AND ECONOMIC DEMANDS.

THE

GROWTH INCURRED DURING THIS TIME SPAN WAS BASICALLY NATURAL
INCREASE.
THE TIME FRAME FOR 1920 UNTIL TODAY WAS THE MOST RAPID GROWTH
PERIOD FOR WILLIAMSTON.
WORLD WAR Two ERA.

OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IS THE POST

IT WAS DURING THIS PERIOD THAT THE VILLAGE

EMERGED FROM A PREDOMINANTLY AGRICULTURAL SERVING COMMUNITY TO A
CITY OF DIVERSE FUNCTIONS.

IN THE LATE 1940S, NEW FACTORS

FORCED THEIR WAY ON THE SCENE AND DISTURBED THE EQUILIBRIUM OF
THE ECONOMY AND POPULATION.

THE MAIN INFLUENCES WHICH CAN NOW

BE IDENTIFIED WERE THE BABY BOOM FOLLOWING THE WAR AND RISING
AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP.

THE INCREASE IN AVAILABLE CARS ENABLED

THE POPULATION TO BECOME VERY MOBILE.

PEOPLE WERE NOT

ECONOMICALLY MANDATED TO RESIDE NEAR MASS TRANSIT ROUTES AS WAS
HISTORICALLY THE CASE.

THIS RELAXATION OF THE NEED FOR

COMPACTNESS IN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS GAVE RISE TO THE PHENOMENA OF
A SPRAWLING SUBURBAN LANDSCAPE, WHICH WILLIAMSTON
FROM.

6

11

BENEFITTED"

�THIS TREND BECAME EVIDENT IN WILLIAMSTON WHEN THE POPULATION GREW
TO 2,051 IN 1950.
CITY BY 1960.

A SMALLER INCREASE OF 163 PEOPLE ENTERED THE

WILLIAMSTON WAS EXPERIENCING AN IN-MIGRATION OF

PEOPLE FROM THE LANSING/EAST LANSING AREA.

THESE PEOPLE FOUND

THEY WERE ECONOMICALLY ABLE TO COMMUTE MILES TO THEIR JOBS AND AT
THE SAME TIME ENJOY THE AMENITIES OF A SMALL TOWN ATMOSPHERE.

BY

1975 WILLIAMSTON HAD GROWN TO BE THE HOME OF 3,013 RESIDENTS.
IT WAS DURING THIS POST WAR ERA THAT RESIDENTS OF WILLIAMSTON
DECIDED TO CHANGE THE STATUS OF THEIR GOVERNMENT.

IN 1945 THE

.VILLAGE BECAME A CITY WITH A STRONG MAYOR FORM OF GOVERNMENT.
EIGHTEEN YEARS LATER VOTERS MODIFIED THE CITY CHARTER, PROVIDING
FOR A CITY MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT.

THESE SHIFTS IN

GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE ARE ALSO INDICATIVE OF THE CHANGES IN
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS.

THE NEWER RESIDENTS HAVE HIGHER

EXPECTATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CREATING THE NEED FOR
EFFICIENT SERVICE PROVISION.

A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT BUT EQUALLY

VALID OBSERVATION CAN ALSO BE MADE REGARDING THESE CHANGES.
INCREASED GROWTH CREATES MORE SERVICE DEMANDS, WHICH NECESSITATES
THE RESTRUCTURING OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT.

IN EITHER CASE,

WILLIAMSTON HAS A BASICALLY SOUND GOVERNMENTAL BASE TO MEET THE
ANTICIPATED PROBLEMS WHICH GROWTH WILL CREATE FOR THE DURATION OF
THIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

7

��THE PEOPLE
THE "TYPICAL" FAMILY LIVING IN WILLIAMSTON RESIDES IN A SINGLEFAMILY HOME, HAS MOVED TO THE CITY AS OPPOSED TO BEING RAISED
THERE, MAKES $11,257 A YEAR, HAS COMPLETED 12.4 YEARS OF SCHOOL,
AND HAS 1 02 CHILDREN.

ALTHOUGH THIS FAMILY DOES NOT EXIST, IT

GIVES A GENERAL INDICATION OF

ILLIAMSTON'S RESIDENT

.

THE FOLLOWING CHARTS AND DISCUSSION GIVE AN INDICATION OF MORE
DETAILED CHARACTERISTICS OF CITY RESIDENTS.

THIS MATERIAL IS

FROM THE 1970 U.S. CENSUS.

INCOME LEVELS
lt:a~r:1~

-

UNDER

s 1,

s 1,000
$

0

-

2,999

s 6,999
s 5 000
$ 7 000 - s 8 999

5

S 9

.o

-

$11.999

53

57
2

3.000

15

27

4, 99

$

F At:11 L. I i;;S

Ut:I BE;;L. 6I i; D ltHH ~ I D~AL.~

59
26

84

11

147

9

293

6

10

0

I COE IS SLIGHTLY OVER BOTH THE
AD INGHAM cau 7Y'S ($11,193) MEDI
OF FAMILIES MAKING LESS THAN $5,000
TRI-COUNTY AVERAGE -18.5 PERCENT

FAMILIES MAKI G $12,000
THE REGlO

-44.l PERCENT FOR WILLIAMSTON

TRl-COU TY REGION.
CS OF WILLIAMST

1

S POPULATION DO

OT.

ROM STATE OF MICHIGAN CHARACTERISTICS.
ON THE FOLLDWI G PAGE.

�over 75

70 • 74
65 •
60 •
55 •
50 •
45 •
40 •
35 •
30 •
25 •
20 •
15 •

69
64
59
54
49
44
39
34
29
24
19

10 • 14
5•9
under

765 4321

5

123456 7

7 6 54 321

percent

1234 5 6 7

percent

over 75

70 • 74
65 • 69
60 • 64

I

::::::::N:-:.:
_:_•:ww•

I
::::::~:-;::::~ ••: ::=J

:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:=t
1.=.•===+:::=·=·=tw=···====

I
... ~:~;~:·:·:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:f::;i

55 •
50 •
45 •
40 •
35 •
30 •
25 •

59
54
49
44
39
34
29

~:. ......

I

:I·W:I::.f..::

I

I

20• 24
15 • 19

10 • 14
5• 9
under 5

I
76 54321

12345 67

percent

0rJ1./lian.z.t.~..._,eii

7 6 5 4 3 21

12345 6 7

percent

�AGE/SEX CHARACTERISTICS
POPULATION

BY AGE AND SEX
UNDER 5 YEARS OLD
9 YEARS OLD
5 10 - 14 YEARS OLD
19 YEARS OLD
24 YEARS OLD
29 YEARS OLD

15 -

-

20

25 30 -

-

35

34 YEARS OLD
39 YEARS OLD

40 - 44 YEARS OLD
45 - 49 YEARS OLD
50 - 54 YEARS OLD
55 - 59 YEARS OLD
64 YEARS OLD
84 YEARS OLD

-

60
65

FEMALE

MALE

OVER 84 YEARS OLD

125

116

147

152

144

146

98

126

97

118

97

85

59

76

60

65

67

66

81

69

54

61

50

58

49

41

88

175

9

21

THE TRIBETWEEN THE CITY AND
COMPARABLE
EDUCATION LEVELS ARE
COMPLETED BY THOSE
AVERAGE YEARS OF SCHOOL
THE
COUNTY REGION.
CHART SHOWS
THE FOLLOWING
1 2. 4 •
IS
IN
BOTH
OLDER
IN WILLIAMSTON.
OF 25 YEARS AND
COMPLETED BY RESIDENTS
OF
YEARS
THE ACTUAL NUMBER
COMPLETED
YEARS OF EDUCATION
MALE

EDUCATION LE=:VELS
PERSONS OVER 24 WHO HAVE
COMPLETED:
8 YEARS GRADE SCHOOL
0 3 YEARS HIGH SCHOOL
1 YEARS HIGH SCHOOL
4

FEMALE

94

140

95

125

208

297

3 YEARS COLLEGE
YEARS COLLEGE

89

83

39

57

OVER 4 YEARS COLLEGE

59

24

1
4

-

ECONOMY WILLIAMSTON
IN WHAT SECTOR OF THE
SHOWS
CHART
THE FINAL
RESIDENTS ARE EMPLOYED.

12

�EMPLOYMENT CHARACTERISTICS
LABOR FORCE 14 YEARS OLD AND
OVER BY SEX
IN ARMED FORCES
IN LABOR FORCE,

FEMALE

MALE

0

0
EMPLOYED

568

PROFESSIONAL, TECHNICAL

108

MANAGERS, ADMINISTRATORS

78

SALES WORKERS

39

CLERICAL AND KINDRED WORKERS

17

CRAFTSMEN AND KINDRED WORKERS

88

TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT OPERATIVES

14

LABORERS,

34

FARMERS AND FARM MANAGERS

0

FARM LABORERS AND FARM FOREMEN

O

SERVICE, EXCEPT HOUSEHOLD

49

PRIVATE HOUSEHOLD WORKERS

0

OCCUPATION NOT REPORTED

O

IN LABOR FORCE, UNEMPLOYED

19

55
125

51

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

186

UNDER 65 YEARS OLD
OVER

56

122

65 YEARS OLD

0

141

OPERATIVES, EXCEPT TRANSPORT
EXCEPT FARM

398

64

30

17
5
0
0

75
5

11

21
579
380
199

ONE INTERESTING NOTE IS THAT WILLIAMSTON HAS A SLIGHTLY HIGHER
PERCENTAGE OF PROFESSIONAL AND MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES IN THE MALE
LABOR FORCE WHEN COMPARED TO THE TRI-COUNTY REGION.

NINETEEN

PERCENT OF THE MALES IN WILLIAMSTON ARE CLASSIFIED AS
PROFESSIONAL COMPARED TO 17.3 PERCENT IN THE REGION.

MANAGERIAL

EMPLOYEES COMPOSE 13.7 PERCENT OF THE MALE LABOR FORCE WITHIN
THE CITY COMPARED TO 9.6 PERCENT FOR THE REGION.
SOME GENERAL CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN FROM THIS INFORMATION.
FIRST,

THE CITY CANNOT PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO KEEP

YOUNG (20-29 YEARS OF AGE) JOB SEEKERS IN THE COMMUNITY.

ENTRY

LEVEL WHITE COLLAR AND MANUFACTURING EMPLOYMENT POSITIONS DO NOT
EXIST IN SUFFICIENT NUMBERS.

ALSO, THE EDUCATIONAL AND

RECREATIONAL POSSIBILITIES OF LARGER URBAN AREAS ATTRACT YOUNGER

13

�PEOPLE AS DO ITS EMPLOYMENT ALTERNATIVES.

IT SHOULD BE NOTED

THAT THIS CONDITION IS NOT UNIQUE TO WILLIAMSTON.

MOST

COMMUNITIES WITH POPULATIONS UNDER 10,000 EXPERIENCE SIMILAR OUTMIGRATION OF THIS AGE GROUP.

THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY

MECHANISM TO REVERSE THIS TREND IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE,
ESPECIALLY WITH WILLIAMSTON'S CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE LANSING
METROPOLITAN AREA.
WILLIAMSTON'S HIGH PERCENTAGE OF RESIDENTS MAKING $5,000 A YEAR
OR LESS CAN BE EQUATED TO THE HIGH PERCENTAGE OF THE RESIDENTS
WHO ARE 65 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER.

THESE PEOPLE, LIVING ON

FIXED INCOMES, POSE HOUSING AND RECREATION PROBLEMS TO CITY
DECISION-MAKERS.

SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING PROJECTS TO MEET THEIR

UNIQUE LIFESTYLE AND RECREATION NEEDS WILL HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED.
THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT WOULD SERVICE MANY PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF
WILLIAMSTON.

THE SURROUNDING TOWNSHIPS--WILLIAMSTOWN AND

WHEATFIELD--ALSO HAVE SIMILAR HIGH PERCENTAGES OF OLDER
RESIDENTS.

ALTHOUGH THE CITY COULD NOT INITIATE A PROJECT OF

THIS NATURE, ANY OUTSIDE PROPOSAL SHOULD BE ENTHUSIASTICALLY
RECEIVED.

14

�POPULATION PROJECTIONS

CITY PLANNING IS BASICALLY DESIGNING FACILITIES TO SERVE ADDITIONAL
PEOPLE AND DECIDING WHERE IN THE COMMUNITY THESE NEW PEOPLE SHOULD
RESIDE.

IT IS POPULATION GROWTH WHICH MANDATES THIS PLANNING.

WITHOUT GROWTH A CITY WOULD ONLY HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF OBSOLETE FACILITIES.

WILLIAMSTON IS GOING TO CONTINUE GROWING.
EAST LANSING,

ITS PROXIMITY TO LANSING/

THE CONTINUAL SPRAWL FROM THE DETROIT AREA, AND

WILLIAMSTON'S OWN NATURAL INCREASE WILL BOAST THE CITY'S POPULATION
TO 3760 BY THE YEAR 2000.

Two FACTORS INFLUENCE POPULATION INCREASE FOR A COMMUNITY:
NATURAL INCREASE -

BIRTHS MINUS DEATHS,

OR OUT OF A COMMUNITY.

1)

AND 2) NET MIGRATION INTO

(A THIRD FACTOR, ANNEXATION IS ALSO SOME-

TIMES USED IN MAKING POPULATION PROJECTIONS.

FOR THE PURPOSES OF

THIS STUDY, ANNEXATIONS ARE NOT CONSIDERED.)

BY USING THESE

FACTORS AND MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE COHORT-SURVIVAL METHOD FOR
DETERMINING NATURAL INCREASE AND INVESTIGATING PAST TRENDS FOR
MIGRATION,

AN ESTIMATE OF THE FUTURE POPULATION CAN BE MADE.

THE

FOLLOWING CHART SHOWS THE POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR WILLIAMSTON
AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES.

THE APPENDICES HAVE A DETAILING OF

THE POPULATION PROJECTION METHODOLOGY.
1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

WILLIAMSTON CITY

2,051

2,214

2,600

3,068

3,442

3,760

WILLIAMSTOWN TOWNSHIP

1 , 175

1,963

2,847

3,862

4,897

5,953

· 761

898

1 , 1 77

1 , 5 71

1 , 915

2,251

WHEATFIELD TOWNSHIP
INGHAM COUNTY

172,941 211,296 261,039 290,068 319,437 346,554

THE CHART INDICATES THAT THE COUNTY WILL EXPERIENCE A GROWTH FROM
1970 TO 2000 OF 34 PERCENT.

THE TOWNSHIPS SURROUNDING WILLIAMSTON

HAVE PROJECTED GROWTH RATES OF 91 PERCENT AND 108 PERCENT RESPECTFULLY
FOR WHEATFIELD AND WILLIAMSTOWN.

AND WILLIAMSTON WILL GROW BY 1160

PEOPLE OR 45 PERCENT.

15

�THESE FIGURES WILL BE USED IN DETERMINING LAND ALLOCATIONS FOR
DIFFERING LAND USE CATEGORIES, SEWER LINE CAPACITIES AND OTHER
COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS.

THESE FIGURES COULD ALSO BE USED IN

PROJECTING CITY REVENUES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PURPOSES.

16

���WATER
THE WILLIAMSTON AREA IS DRAINED BY A COMPLEX NATURAL AND MANMADE
SYSTEM.

THE MAIN COMPONENT, THE RED CEDAR RIVER,

VARIETY OF CREEKS AND DRAINS.

IS FED BY A

THE DEER AND DOAN CREEKS TO THE

SOUTH OF THE CITY DRAIN LARGE ACRES OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS IN
WHEATFIELD,

LEROY,

INGHAM AND WHITE

□ AK

TOWNSHIPS.

TO THE NORTH

THE HILL DRAIN AND THE SQUAW CREEK MOVE STORM WATER OFF SIMILAR
LAND ACTIVITIES.

MAP 2 SHOWS THE LOCATION,

TYPE AND SIZE OF

INDIVIDUAL DRAINS WITHIN THE AREA.
THE DRAINAGE PATTERN EXHIBITED BY THE WILLIAMSTON AREA IS THE
RESULT OF EVENTS 30,000 YEARS AGO.

CONTINENTAL GLACIERS ADVANCED

OVER THE AREA AND COVERED WILLIAMSTON WITH HUNDREDS OF FEET OF
ICE AND SUSPENDED GRAVEL AND SOIL.
GLACIERS STARTED RECEDING.

ABOUT 15,000 YEARS AGO THE

THE FOLLOWING SKETCHES SHOW HOW THE

DRAINAGE NETWORK WAS FORMED.
ANOTHER IMPORTANT RESULT OF THE RECEDING GLACIERS WAS TO BURY THE
CITY'S WATER SUPPLY WITH A PROTECTIVE LAYER MEASURING HUNDREDS OF
FEET IN DEPTH OF GRAVEL AND SAND.

BEFORE THE GLACIERS COVERED

THE AREA THE PRIMARY LAND FEATURE WAS AN EXPOSED BED OF SANDSTONE
300 TO 900 FEET IN THICKNESS, CALLED THE SAGINAW FORMATION.

THIS

SANDSTONE HAS ENOUGH PERMEABILITY TO STORE VAST QUANTITIES OF
WATER.

WITHOUT THE OVERLAYING GLACIAL DEPOSITS WHICH PROTECT THE

SANDSTONE BED FROM POLLUTION,
MUCH HIGHER TODAY.

WILLIAMSTON'S WATER COSTS WOULD BE

THE GRAVEL AND SAND DEPOSITS, CALLED GLACIAL

DRIFT, ALSO PROVIDE WATER SUPPLIES TO MANY INDIVIDUAL USERS.
CITY WOULD BE HARD PRESSED,

THOUGH,

THE

TO TAP GLACIAL DRIFT SUPPLIES,

SINCE THEIR CAPACITY FOR WATER EXTRACTION IS MORE LIMITED THAN
THE SAGINAW FORMATION.
THE FINAL ASPECT OF WATER TO BE DISCUSSED IN THIS SECTION IS
WATER POLLUTION.
ALL CITIZENS.

WATER POLLUTION POSES MANY COSTLY PROBLEMS TO

MANY HEALTH HAZARDS AND DECREASED RECREATIONAL

OPPORTUNITIES ARE WELL KNOWN AND DOCUMENTED.
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION IS NOT SO APPARENT.

ANOTHER PROBLEM OF
OF THE AVERAGE 31

INCHES OF RAIN WHICH FALLS ON WILLIAMSTON YEARLY,

24 INCHES

RETURN TO THE ATMOSPHERE THROUGH EVAPORATION AND TRANSPJRATION
FROM PLANTS.

AVERAGE SURFACE RUNOFF IS SEVEN INCHES, OF WHICH

19

�-

1

.f

-,
I

l l
f
I

-&lt;1

2 0 2 4 6 MILES
II I I I I

43° 00'

'

C' l-

43°00'\

I

/ J,,
("

'

I

1;'

I

(i

/'
50'

/

_;

1--

.,-,o·~

-

!,

~

,o·rt?
Alo.

I··

,,

/

C'

40'

I

("

I

I

•,i," 'c('
. - / f85°00'

50'

40 '

-\I
30'

42° 10'

i

t.--

4 0'

8 5"00'

84 °10'

20'

B. - As the glaciers melted northward, some melt water h
gan to drain through what is now the Thornapple Rh

A. - During the early melting stages of the glaciers most

melt water drained through the Battle Creek drainage
system.

basin.

rr

I;

I

}r

I

l
43 °00')

2 0 2 4 6 MILES
LLLJ_l J

,

\(.

\I

s l'
:
50'

40'

40'

'

.

I;;;·- ·

I?

I

J____J )

;~~

(

rLo/

J
42' 30'

85'00'

50'

40'

C. - With further melting, some melt water began to drain

westward along an early ancestor of the Grand River.

s~·oo·

50•

40'

V. - By the time active glaciers had nearly melted from tht
. · the Thornapple, Grand, Cedar, a!1d Loo k'ing Gla.'\S,
region,
Rivers had assumed most of their present drainage pattcl'W
and were draining most of the region.

-Drainage in the Tri-County region is a direct result of active glaciation.

�Il

~~ (")
~ - r'
::...iZ 0

mO

::o::o

(./)

I

m

(.J)

m
0

)i

80

ZIMMER

JJ
:• z)&gt; 9,-&lt; ):&gt;
\ !!t ::E .. EZ
0
1)
m

z

ie5

~m

0

BEEMAN

......······ .. ···········•···

••~ILLIAMSTON

··•.....

................··•·•

~

=i

()

:::r:

.
7

r
r

····· .....

VANNETER

U)

m

fT1

I
I

I
I
I
I

0

�ABOUT THREE INCHES IS IN DIRECT SURFACE RUNOFF AND FOUR INCHES IS
GROUNDWATER RUNOFF.*

THIS FOUR INCHES IS PRIMARILY DISCHARGED TO

THE GROUNDWATER ALONG THE BANKS OF THE RED CEDAR.

So AS LONG AS

THE RED CEDAR IS POLLUTED THE WATER REACHING THE GOUNDWATER SUPPLY
CONTAINS CONTAMINATION.

EVENTUALLY THE WATER EXTRACTED FOR

PRIVATE AND INDUSTRIAL USE WILL REQUIRE MORE SOPHISTICATED
TREATMENT, WHICH IS VERY COSTLY, ~EFORE IT CAN BE USED.
WATER POLLUTION IS GENERATED IN THREE BASIC WAYS.
DISCHARGERS LIKE THE CITY TREATMENT PLANT,

DIRECT

INTERMITTENT DISCHARGERS

ON STORM DRAINS AND DISCREET DISCHARGES COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS
NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION.

THE WILLIAMSTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT

PLANT DISCHARGES A VERY HIGH QUALITY OF EFFLUENT AND DOES NOT
DEGRADE WATER QUALITY APPRECIABLY.

THE OTHER TWO WATER POLLUTION

TYPES WILL POSE PROBLEMS TO THE CITY IN THE PLANNING PERIOD.

THE

DISCHARGE FROM STORM DRAINAGE MAY HAVE TO RECEIVE TREATMENT IF THE
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE
1972 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT DEEMS IT NECESSARY.

STORM WATER

DISCHARGE CONTAINS LARGE AMOUNTS OF DIRT, PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND
ORGANIC MATTER.

THESE CONTAMINANTS MAKE THIS DISCHARGED WATER AS

BAD AS THE DISCHARGE FROM A PRIMARY TREATMENT PLANT (WHICH REMOVES
ONLY ABOUT 35 PERCENT OF THE CONTAMINANTS).

WILLIAMSTON MAY HAVE

TO CONSIDER THE TREATMENT OF THIS WATER AT THE PRESENT WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT, OR THE DIVERSION OF WATER TO SOME TYPE OF SETTLING
BASIN.

THE OTHER AREA OF NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION--PRIMARILY SOIL

EROSION AND POORLY DESIGNED NEW DEVELOPMENTS WHICH ALLOW DIRECT
DISCHARGE OF WASTES FROM PARKING LOTS TO DRAINS AND STREAMS--CAN BE
ADDRESSED TODAY BY DECISION-MAKERS WITHIN WILLIAMSTON.

THE BIGGEST

WATER POLLUTANT WITHIN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN IS SOIL EROSION.
SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ACT,
INGHAM COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER,
CONTROLLING THIS POLLUTANT.

ADMINISTERED

THE

BY THE

IS THE PRIMARY MEANS OF

PLANS FOR ON-SITE SOIL CONTROL DURING

CONSTRUCTION OF ANY BUILDING HAVE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THIS
ENFORCEMENT AGENT AND MONITORED FO R COMPLIANCE.

THE CITY CAN DO

ITS PART BY ONLY APPROVI'NG SITE PLANS WHICH HAVE ADEQUATE ON-SITE

* WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR CLINTIW&gt;
EATON AND INGHAM COUNTIES, MICHIGAN, VANLIES, WOOD AND BRUNETT,
1969, P. 13.
22

�RETENTION OF STORM WATER FOR THE INDUCEMENT OF SETTLING OF
IMPURITIES AND BY PROTECTING SOILS WHICH HAVE A HIGH EROSION
POTENTIAL.
SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY
SOILS ARE MAN'S MOST PRECIOUS NATURAL RESOURCE.

WATER AND AIR

HAVE SOME NATURAL CAPACITIES FOR SELF-PURIFICATION BUT WHEN SOILS
ARE POLLUTED OR LOST THROUGH EROSION, THEY ARE GONE FOREVER.
TAKES HUNDREDS OF YEARS TO CREATE SOILS.

IT

SANDS AND CLAY SOILS

ARE MADE THROUGH WEATHERING AND CHEMICAL DECOMPOSITION OF LARGER
PARTICLES.

ORGANIC SOILS--LOAMS, MUCK AND PEAT--ARE MADE THROUGH

THE BREAKING DOWN AND SETTLING OF PLANT AND ANIMAL MATERIAL IN A
SPECIFIC LOW-LYING AREA.

As MENTIONED EARLIER,

ARE WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA.

34 TYPES OF SOILS

MAP 3 SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THESE

SOILS AND OUTLINES THEIR CHARACTERISTICS AND LIMITATIONS FOR
RECEIVING URBAN-TYPE CONSTRUCTION.

As

MAP 3 INDICATES,

THE SOILS IN THE WILLIAMSTON AREA RANGE FROM

SLIGHT TO VERY SEVERE IN THEIR LIMITATIONS FOR INTENSIVE USE.
SOILS HAVING THE GREATEST LIMITATIONS FOR URBAN USES ARE THE
ORGANICS FOUND ALONG THE RED CEDAR RIVER BELOW THE CITY, AND ALONG
THE DRAINAGE COURSES.

As

WOULD BE EXPECTED, MOST EXISTING DEVELOPMENT HAS TAKEN PLACE

WHERE SOIL LIMITATIONS ARE EITHER SLIGHT OR MODERATE.
TRUE IN CENTRAL, NORTH AND WEST WILLIAMSTON.

THIS IS

AT THE SAME TIME,

MOST AREAS WHICH HAVE NOT DEVELOPED DO HAVE SOIL TYPES WHICH POSE
LIMITATIONS.

THIS

IS PARTICULARLY TRUE EAST OF WILLIAMSTON ROAD

AND SOUTH OF THE CITY LIMITS EXTENDING TO l-96.
GENERALLY FOUND WEST OF WILLIAMSTON,

BUT SOIL TYPES

NORTH OF GRAND RIVER AVENUE

AND EAST OF ZIMMER ROAD EXHIBIT THE BEST SUITABILITY FOR
DEVELOPMENT.
MAP 4 SHOWS THE TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA.

As

INDICATED BY THE MAP, THE AREA IS CHARACTERIZED BY MILDLY SLOPING
HILLS AND WIDE EXPANSES OF FLAT AREAS.

TOPOGRAPHIC CONSIDERATIONS

SHOULD NOT CAUSE GREAT CONCERNS IN DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS.

23

�_j\

~

-=~

~

-

\____)

~ ~~" ' - ' - " ' - " ' '

GOOD

MODERATE
P @~

VERY POOR

~
~

EXCAVATED
MATERIAL

_-,

~l~~1

-_-_- _-_-

=~~~-~
~-

~~-):=_
--

1
{i~i1l!~ ~-~~~~~if~t-

Jt!:=:=~~f

:==:_ :·==·:::::::::::::illl\il\it~:::::::-

,

�§d7J

ZIMMER

g_

~o
~G)

~:Il
§ )&gt;
7J

I

~
:::0

~

D
~

!"Tl
BEEMAN

00
00
00

]~
7
lD
CJ)

'O
~

1/b
I

I

\

12

�FLOODPLAIN
THE RED CEDAR RIVER AND DEER CREEK OVERFLOWED THEIR BANKS IN
APRIL OF 1975.

THIS FLOOD WAS CLASSIFIED AS A 100-YEAR FLOOD AND

WAS THE DIRECT RESULT OF AN UNUSUAL FIVE-INCH RAINSTORM 1WHICH
FELL

ON SATURATED SOILS.

A 100-YEAR FLOOD, WHICH IS TECHNICALLY

CALLED AN INTERMEDIATE REGIONAL FLOOD,

IS ONE WHICH HAS

STATISTICAL CHANCE OF OCCURRING ONCE IN A HUNDRED YEARS
DESIGNATED LOCATION,

AT A

ALTHOUGH THIS MAGNITUDE OF FLOOD COULD OCCUR

IN ANY YEAR.
IN THE 1975 FLOOD, TWENTY HOMES AND FIVE BUSINESSES WERE FLOODED,
WITH DAMAGE COSTS IN THE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS.

WILLIAMSTON TOOK

STEPS TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN WHEN IT
ENACTED THE BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE
PROGRAM.

THIS WILL ALLOW THE EXISTING STRUCTURES IN THE FLOOD

HAZARD AREA TO OBTAIN SUBSIDIZED FLOOD INSURANCE.

THE CITY HAS

ALSO ADOPTED STRICT ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE FLOODPLAIN AREA
WHICH WILL CONTROL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THE FLOOD HAZARD AREA,
AND THUS MINIMIZE LOSSES WHEN THE NEXT FLOOD OCCURS.
THE EXTENT OF THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN.

THE PLAN MAP ALSO

DESIGNATES THIS SAME AREA FOR PROTECTION.

26

MAP 5 SHOWS

�V~7C

II_

---==lc::i]======,MMER==========ir==l=I=====/

=rr====;ll

z

rtj ,,
::or
s.: 0
rn

I
I

·~ ..

I
I

..,,o 0
r~O
o;.; -u
ornr

., .
.::,~./?
1 .·

~

O:;o )&gt;
.._,rr, G)

l&gt;

,,,

BEEMAN
.,

") ~~·d~~

~

========,

~::;:=:==~~W~ILLIA~MSTO~N

't:::::i

~

1,;;;..---1-r,rr

;1

z

::::"ti·~-

==i===='\r-.

-7--=•

~

.-

;.

~

I

;iiJt::::::;:;~;:~;w;jfJ,., {

;

.

~

I
I

]

• l

:,: .. ·

. ;::\,:

iO

z

z)&gt; u,
r

0

., .. ~.«.'•

;

..·,

1/

I '~~-

]

:•: . ./:~;/t:-':·:·.-':I;~~?;:i::,.,.

'

L-.;~~F

,-i~/\,,.,.c

·-.

□

r

~==~~
~

VANNETER

I i &gt;\/..-:

I

7

\'r/t·
·._._,:

~
g

0

/ ./\\.:.:

II

:

0

}
•

��THE BUILDINGS
A CITY IS MADE UP OF MANY THINGS.
THE LAND IT IS BUILT UPON.

THE PEOPLE WHO R SIDE THERE.

THE COMMUNITY SPIRIT EXEMPLIFIED BY

ITS PEOPLE'S HOPES AD ASPIRATIONS.
OF ANY COMMUNITY IS ITS BUILDINGS.

BUT THE MOST VISIBLE COMPONE
THE BUILDINGS IN A CITY ARE

ALSO A REFLECTION OF THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THEM, AD OF THE
RESIDENTS' COMMUNITY SPIRIT.

W LL-KEPT HOMES, CEA

BUSINESS

BUILDINGS AND EFFICIE T COMMU ITY SERVICES INDICATE THAT PEOPLE
ARE PROUD OF AND CONCERNED FOR THE CITY'S FUTURE.
THIS SECTION OF THE WILLIAMSTON COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
WILL LOOK AT THE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES IN THE CITY.

COMMUNITY

SERVICES SUCH AS SCHOOLS, SEWAGE DISPOSAL, ROADS AND RECREATION
LAND WILL ALSO BE ANALYZED TO DETERMINE THEIR PRESENT CAPACITY
AND REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPANSION TO MEET FUTURE NEEDS.

EXISTING LAND UsE ACTIVITIES
MAP 6 SHOWS THE EXISTING LAND USE ACTIVITIES WITHIN WILLIAMSTON.

A MEASUREMENT OF THE ACREAGE COVERED BY DIFFERENT USE CLASSIFICA
TIONS IS SUMMARIZED IN THE FOLLOWING CHART.
EXISTING LAND USE MEASUREMENTS
CITY OF WILLIAMSTON

Lat:!12 UsE

~~BEAGE

SINGLE FAMILY

I QE

T□ JAb

190.41

34.26

Two FAMILY

12.79

2.30

MULTIPLE FAMILY

25.60

4.61

0 .. 92

0. 1 7

VACANT LAND

81.27

14.62

COMMERCIAL

37.88

6.82

INDUSTRIAL

58.88

10. 59

PUBLIC

96.30

17.33

SCENIC PUBLIC

§1.ZJ

21~1

MIXED

Uses

TOTAL

555.78

100.00

RESIDENTIAL USES ACCOUNT FOR THE BULK OF THE LAND USE ACTIVITY
WITHIN WILLIAMSTON
THE PREDOMINANT
MAJORITY O

AD OFT

TRUCTUR

IN

TOTAL, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ARE
C NT YEARS, HOWEVER, THE

NEW RESIDENTIAL CO

TION HA
0

BEN THE MULTIPLE

�SCALE

0

jhJ
-------~~
CJ Low Density Residential

E

Medium Density Residential
z

High Density Residential

h:•::·:,: I Commercial

@~:f#j~ Industrial
-Public

lllll Semi-Public

~

~
&lt;(

:J
_j

i

J~

LINN

1400

2800

�FAMILY UNIT AND MOBILE HOME DEVELOPMENTS.

THIS TREND IS NOT UNUSUAL

AS IT IS OCCURRING NATIONWIDE BECAUSE OF INFLATION IN THE
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND HIGHER MORTGAGE RATES FROM LENDING
INSTITUTIONS.
OVERALL, THE CONDITION OF HOUSING IN THE CITY IS GOOD.

ACCORDING

ij

THE 19 70 U. S. CENSUS THE AVERAGE VALUE OF OWNER OCCUPIED UN ITS WAS
$16,000.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A FEW UNITS,

PLUMBING FACILITIES,

HOT AND COLD WATER AND FULL KITCHEN FACILITIES WERE OPERATIONAL IN
THE 862 UNITS COUNTED.

HOUSING IN THE CITY IS ALSO OF DECENT SIZE,

WITH 5.5 ROOMS PER STRUCTURE BEING THE MEDIAN SIZE.
HOUSING INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW

MORE DETAILED

IN THE APPENDICES.

COMMER CI AL LAND USES GENERALLY FOLLOW GRAND RI VER AVENUE ALONG MOST
OF I TS LENGTH,

AL THOUGH THE GREATEST CONCENTRATION IS

BUSINESS DISTRICT.

IN THE CENTRAL

OUTSIDE OF THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MOST ~

THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE OF THE CONVENIENCE TYPE:

FOOD AND GAS.

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IS MORE PREDOMINANT ALONG WEST GRAND RIVER
AVENUE IN THE VICINITY OF CORWIN ROAD,

WHERE THERE IS ACCESS TO THE

C&amp;D, ., AND EAST OF WILLIAMSTON ROAD SERVICING THE AGRICULTURAL
ENTERPRISES WHICH SURROUND THE CITY.
THE 96 • 3 ACRES OF PUBLIC LANDS ARE SCHOOLS, GOVERNMENTAL BUILDINGS ,
PARKS AND OTHER COMMUNITY SERVICE INSTALLATIONS.

THESE FACILITIES

WILL BE DESCRIBED IN MORE DETAIL IN SUBSEQUENT SECTIONS.

THE OTHER

MAIN CATEGORY--THE 52 ACRES OF scr:NIC PUBLIC LANDS--INCLUDES THE
COUNTRY CLUB AND VARIOUS CHURCH PROPERTIES.

COMMUNITY FACILITIES
SCHOOLS
THE CITY IS THE CORE OF THE WILLIAMSTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
THIS DISTRICT, ONE OF THE LARGEST IN THE TRI-COUNTY REGION, SERVES
PARTS OF ALAIEDON,

LEROY,

LOCKE, MERIDIAN,

WHEATFIELD AND

WILLIAMSTOWN TOWNSHIPS WITH AN ESTIMATED POPULATION OF 7,200 IN
1970.
TOTAL SCHOOL ENROLLMENT FOR THE 1974 SCHOOL YEAR WAS ESTIMATED AT
1,896 STUDENTS ATTENDING FOUR SCHOOL FACILITIES ON THREE LEVELS-TWO ELEMENTARY ( K-5) , ONE MI DOLE SCHOOL ( 6 &amp; 8) AND ONE HIGH scHO OL •

�PRESENTLY,

CLASSROOMS ARE NOT PARTICULARLY OVERCROWDED.

HOWEVER,

PORTABLE FACILITIES ARE BEING USED AT BOTH THE MIDDLE AND HIGH
SCHOOLS.

ALL FOUR OF THESE SCHOOLS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY

LIMITS.
Two PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS ALSO OPERATE IN THE AREA.

ST. MARY'S

CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (1-6) HAS ENROLLMENT OF APPROXIMATELY
134 STUDENTS.

THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST SCHOOL HAS AN ENROLLMENT

OF ABOUT 16 STUDENTS IN GRADES 1-8.
THE NUMBER OF COLLEGE-BOUND HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES IS ON THE
DECLINE, WITH ONLY ABOUT 40 PERCENT OF THE 1973 GRADUATES
EXPECTING TO ENTER COLLEGE AS COMPARED TO 50 PERCENT IN 1972 AND
70 PERCENT

IN 1971.

So AS A RESULT MORE EMPHASIS

IS BEING PLACED

ON VOCATIONAL TRAINING AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL.
THE ONLY TENTATIVE PLANS TO DATE FOR SCHOOL EXPANSION IS THE
REPLACEMENT OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILT IN 1929.

THE PRESENT

STRUCTURE IS CONSIDERED UNSOUND AND IS LOCATED ON A SUBSTANDARD
SITE.

No DATE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR THIS REPLACEMENT,

ALTHOUGH

IT SHOULD OCCUR SOON.

A SUMMARY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES IS PROVIDED IN THE APPENDICES.
PUBLIC BUILDINGS
FIRE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED TO WILLIAMSTON,

THE TOWNSHIPS OF

WILLIAMSTOWN AND WHEATFIELD AND THE W~STERN HALF OF LOCKE TOWNSHIP
ON A VOLUNTEER BASIS.

AMBULANCE SERVICE IS ALSO PROVIDED ON A

VOLUNTEER BASIS COVERING THE SAME JURISDICTIONS, WITH THE
ADDITION OF THE REMAINDER OF LOCKE TOWNSHIP AND ALL OF LEROY
TOWNSHIP.
THE EQUIPMENT MAINTAINED BY THE DEPARTMENT IS ADEQUATE FOR ITS
BASIC RESPONSIBILITY.

THE ECONOMIES OF MAINTAINING A LARGER FORCE

WOULD BE PROHIBITIVELY EXPENSIVE.

THE DENSITY OF POPULATION IN

THE NINETY SQUARE MILES THAT THE FORCE MUST COVER IS FIFTY PERSONS
PER MILE OUTSIDE OF WILLIAMSTON.

EVEN WITH THIS DISPERSED AREA,

THE DEPARTMENT HAS AN EXCELLENT RESPONSE TIME OF BETWEEN ONE-ANDA-HALF TO THREE MINUTES.
THE CITY FIRE HYDRANTS ARE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY AND ARE NOT PART
OF THE DEPARTMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY.

PERIODIC CHECKING OF THESE

HYDRANTS IS PERFORMED BY THE MICHIGAN INSPECTION BUREAU.
33

�SCALE

0

1400

2800

J
I

l

~
m
-

GRA,-.RIVER AVE.

'·-~~··F

'.?~
---WALLACE
-r-,,-----

■
A

PARK SITES

~~1,
D

WILLIAMSTON MEMORIALPARK

B McCORMICK PARK
C DEER CREEK PARK
D THE "WELL SITE 11 PROPERTY
E
F

, .11

~TJf!::£

- - - · CJ
------.

II

·,

-

------- -----

IIZ

111::f
~

I

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
WEST WILLIAMSTON · WELL NO. 3

i~

LINN

7

C

_/

,

(_ ~

--- -----------

-..;

�POLICE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY SIX FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE
CITY, UTILIZING TWO POLICE VEHICLES, ONE OF WHICH IS REPLACED
ANNUALLY.
OFFICERS ON THE FORCE MUST HAVE 240 HOURS OF POLICE ACADEMY
TRAINING OR HAVE WORKED FOR ANOTHER POLICE FORCE FOR AT LEAST THREE
YEARS.

POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL ARE DISPATCHED THROUGH A COMMON

FACILITY WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
THE CITY OF WILLIAMSTON PRESENTLY OWNS FOUR STRUCTURES USED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES.

THEY ARE THE CITY HALL, A

RECENTLY ACQUIRED CAR DEALERSHIP BUILDING (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS
THE CITY HALL ANNEX),

THE WILLIAMSTON POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT

BUILDING AND THE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING.

OF THESE STRUCTURES,

PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND THE CITY GARAGE NEED REPLACEMENT.

THE
THE

PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING IS TOO SMALL TO OPERATE EFFICIENTLY AND IS
LOCATED IN THE FLOODPLAIN.
PARKS AND RECREATION
THE WILLIAMSTON COMMUNITY PARK AND RECREATION SYSTEM OPERATES
UNDER POLICIES DEVELOPED BY A CITY RECREATION COMMISSION ESTABLISHED
BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

MAINTENANCE OF THE PARKS SYSTEM IS DONE BY A

PARKS DIVISION WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.

MAP 7 SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THE EXIST-ING PARKS WITHIN THE CITY.
THESE SITES WERE DEVELOPED UNDER A PLAN DEVELOPED IN 1971 BY
VICTOR HOGG.
PLAN.
AREA A -

THE FOLLOWING ARE THE PARKS IN EXISTENCE UNDER THAT

WILLIAMSTON MEMORIAL PARK.

THIS AREA WAS

SPECIFICALLY ACQUIRED IN THE LATE 1950S FOR DEVELOPMENT
AS A RECREATIONAL PARK.

IT COMPRISES ABOUT 13 ACRES OF

GENTLY SLOPING GROUND AND A PLEASANT VISTA OF THE RIVER.
IT rs PRIMARILY OPEN GROUND, EXCEPT FOR A NARROW WOODED
BORDER ALONG THE RIVER.

A NARROW CHANNEL OF THE RIVER

ISOLATES A SMALL PORTION OF THE LAND KNOWN AS SCOUT
ISLAND.

THE SITE IS EXCELLENT FOR ACTIVE SPORTS.

DENNIS COLLINS MEMORIAL POOL IS LOCATED HERE,
FACILITIES FOR OTHER SPORTS.
RELATIONSHIP TO THE RIVER.
LAND ADJACENT TO THE PARK,

THE

AS ARE

IT HAS AN EXCELLENT
A POSSIBILITY EXISTS THAT

TO THE EAST, WILL SOON BE
35

�AVAILABLE FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY.

THIS LAND IS

SHAPED BY EARLIER MINING OPERATIONS AND CONSISTS OF
RELATIVELY HIGH MOUNDS AND NARROW VALLEYS.

IT IS

COVERED WITH SECOND GROWTH TIMBER AND CONTAINS AN
EXCELLENT, DAMMED LAGOON AT A SLIGHTLY HIGHER ELEVATION
THAN THE RIVER AT NORMAL LEVEL.
AREA B -

McCORMICK PARK.

THIS LONG-ESTABLISHED PARK WAS

DEDICATED TO THE CITY BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
IT CONSISTS OF RELATIVELY FLAT, GRASSY TURF WITH SCATTERED,
MATURE TREES.

THE GENTLY CURVING BANK OF THE MILLPOND OF

THE RED CEDAR GIVES IT EXCELLENT VISUAL QUALITIES.

IT IS

CONVENIENTLY LOCATED FOR MANY OLDER RESIDENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY.

IT HAS A HIGH POTENTIAL FOR DEVELOPMENT AS A

PLACE FOR FAMILY GROUPS, PICNICS AND LESS ACTIVE SPORTS.
IT IS RECOGNIZED AS A PLEASANT PLACE TO FISH AND THE RIVER
IS KNOWN AS AN EXCELLENT STREAM FOR NORTHERN PIKE, BASS
AND PAN FISH.

THIS PARK IS WELL SITUATED TO FUNCTION AS A

CENTER FOR RIVER-ORIENTED SPORTS AND ACTIVITIES.
AREA C - DEER CREEK PARK.

THE NORTHERN PORTIONS OF THIS

LAND ARE DEDICATED TO RECREATIONAL PURPOSES.

THE SOUTHERN

PORTION CONTAINS THE CITY GARAGE AND IS THE SITE OF A
PREPARED SKATING RINK WHICH IS FLOODED AND MAINTAINED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS EACH WINTER.

THE

UNDEVELOPED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS VERY LOW AND OFTEN
FLOODED.

THIS LAND ALSO CONTAINS MANY MATURE TREES.

AREA D - THE "WELL SITE" PROPERTY.

THIS PROPERTY WAS

ACQUIRED BY THE CITY FOR THE LOCATION OF A NEW CITY WELL,
IT IS LIMITED, AT PRESENT, BY DIFFICULT ACCESS BUT HAS A
HIGH POTENTIAL AS A NATURAL AREA AND AS A CONVENIENT AND
WELL-SUITED AREA FOR CAMPING ACTIVITY.
NOT A LARGE STREAM,

DEER CREEK, THOUGH

IS VERY PRETTY AND COULD, WITH

MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDE

A NEEDED RECREATIONAL

RESOURCE FOR THE COMMUNITY.
AREA E - THE WASTE WATER TREATMENT SITE.
THE TREATMENT FACILITIES FOR THE CITY.

THIS LAND CONTAINS
EXPANSION OF THE

PLANT AS A TERTIARY TREATMENT PLANT IS USING MUCH OF THE
AVAILABLE LAND.

BUT THE EASTERN PORTION, THOUGH LOW AND

SWAMPY, HAS SOME DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL.
36

�AREA F - WEST WILLIAMSTON (WELL N3).

THIS CITY-OWNED

PROPERTY IS THE LOCATION OF ONE OF THE CITY'S WATER
WELLS.

ITS POTENTIAL IS NOT GREAT, HOWEVER, AS IT IS

RELATIVELY FLAT,

UNWOODED AND LOCATED ACROSS THE RATHER

BUSY HIGHWAY FROM THE MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS OF THE WEST
WILLIAMSTON AREA.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
WATER SUPPLY

As

PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED IN THE SECTION ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT,

WILLAMSTON RECEIVES ITS WATER SUPPLIES FROM GROUNDWATER.
TAPS THE UNDERGROUND ACQUIFER AT THREE SITES.
AND 3 (NO.

THE CITY

CITY WELLS No. 2

1 WAS ABANDONED A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO) ARE LOCATED

ALONG THE C&amp;O RAILROAD TRACKS BEHIND THE MIDDLE SCHOOL.

EACH WELL

IS 160 FEET DEEP AND IS DRIVEN BY 480-VOLT THREE-PHASE ELECTRIC
MOTORS.

CHLORINATION IS PROVIDED AT ALL WELL SITES IN ACCORD WITH

MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATIONS.

CITY WELL No. 4 IS A STANDBY

WELL, POWERED BY ELECTRICITY AND AN OPTIONAL GASOLINE ENGINE, TO
BE USED IN CASE OF POWER OR MECHANICAL FAILURE IN THE OTHER TWO
WELLS.
WELLS 2 AND 3 PROVIDE APPROXIMATELY 288,000 GALLONS PER DAY OF
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY WATER.

THIS AMOUNT OF WATER JUST MEETS THE

NEEDS OF THE EXISTING POPULATION.

BECAUSE OF THIS,

SELECTED TWO POSSIBLE SITES FOR EXPANSION.
STUDY BY WILLIAMS AND WORKS,

THE CITY HAS

A GROUNDWATER RESOURCE

ENGINEERS, SHOWED TWO AREAS OF WATER

BEARING FORMATIONS--ON THE HIGH SCHOOL PROPERTY AT VAN ETTES AND
MITCHELL ROADS AND IN THE SOUTH END OF THE CITY ADJACENT TO DEER
CREEK.

BASED ON THIS STUDY,

TESTS BY LAYNE-NORTHERN Co.,

THE CITY COMMISSIONED ADDITIONAL
INC., WHO DRILLED A TEST WELL ON THE

DEER CREEK SITE.
THEY FOUND THAT THIS FIELD COULD GENERATE TWO
3
SO-GALLONS-PER-MINUTE WELLS, OR AN ADDITIONAL 504,000 GALLONS OF
WATER PER DAY.

THE TOTAL WATER AVAILABLE FROM WELLS 2,

3 AND 5

WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 692,000 GALLONS PER DAY--OR SUFFICIENT WATER
TO MEET DEMANDS THROUGH THE LATE 1970S.

DURING THE PLANNING

PERIOD A SECOND WELL SHOULD BE DRILLED AT THE DEER CREEK FIELD TO
MEET INCREASED DEMAND.
THAT WOULD INCREASE THE WELL CAPACITY TO
1 296 000
'
•
GALLONS PER DAY.

37

�i=:iJ/ ][Jt
11

I

I
I
I

CORWIN

I
I

I

I

I

-----

I
~

J:&gt;

r

~l'Tl

~

~
]

BEEMAN

I

I

nf{a=:~r

I
PUTMAN

~ir===~f!:~WIL=:=:=LIA~Ms=roN=====1-----. f r = ~~ ~ ~\ : ~ ~rr=:t ~=;i=========~

z
z

/ MILL

VANNETER

I
I

I
I
I
I
I

0

1/1

("\

-~

g

7

...)&gt;m

�MAP 8 SHOWS THE LOCATION AND SIZE OF THE EXISTING WATER
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.

EIGHTY PERCENT OF THE WATER MAINS IN USE

TODAY WERE CONSTRUCTED EITHER IN 1937 OR 1948.

THESE MAINS ARE

CAST IRON AND SHOULD HAVE A LIFE EXPECTANCY OF 50 TO 100 YEARS.
MAINS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE PAST FEW YEARS ARE DUCTITE IRON,
WHICH PROVIDES GREATER STRENGTH, QUALITY AND CORROSION RESISTANCE
AND THEREFORE AN EVEN LONGER LIFE EXPECTANCY.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND SEWER SYSTEM
THE PRESENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT HAS UNDERGONE SEVERAL
IMPROVEMENTS IN RECENT YEARS TO RAISE THE LEVEL OF TREATMENT SO
THAT DISCHARGES INTO THE RED CEDAR ARE CONSIDERED ENVIRONMENTALLY
ACCEPTABLE.

THE PRESENT PLANT WAS OPENED IN THE FALL OF 1971 AND

IS CONSIDERED TO BE A TERTIARY TREATMENT FACILITY WHICH IS ABLE TO
REMOVE 95-99 PERCENT OF KNOWN TROUBLESOME POLLUTANTS.
THE PLANT, WHICH IS LOCATED AT THE END OF SUNSET STREET,

IS

PRESENTLY OPERATING AT A FLOW OF 300,000 TO 350,000 GALLONS PER
DAY.

THE PLANT HAS A CAPACITY OF 500,000 GALLONS A DAY, WHICH

COULD SUPPORT A POPULATION OF 5,000 WITH NO PROBLEMS.

THE PLANT

WAS ALSO DESIGNED SO THAT MINOR RENOVATIONS AND ADDITIONS COULD
EASILY ESTABLISH A CAPACITY OF ONE MILLION GALLONS A DAY.
MAP 9 SHOWS THE PRESENT SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEM WHICH CONSISTS OF
EIGHT- TO FIFTEEN-INCH PIPES.

THE SEWERS ARE SEPARATE,

IN THAT

THE CITY HAS RECENTLY COMPLETED A SEWER AND STORM DRAIN SEPARATION
PROGRAM.
SOME SEWER LINES AND LIFT STATIONS NEED RENOVATION.

THE HIGH

STREET AND CORWIN ROAD LIFT STATIONS SHOULD BE RENOVATED OR REBUILT
AND AT SOME FUTURE PERIOD IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT THE SYSTEM
ACROSS THE RIVER BE REPLACED WITH A POWER LIFT STATION.

BASICALLY,

SEWER LINES IN MOST AREAS ARE ADEQUATE TO HANDLE PRESENT LOADS, BUT
ANY LARGE GROWTH IN A GIVEN AREA SHOULD RESULT IN AN ENGINEERING
STUDY TO DETERMINE THE ABILITY TO HANDLE ADDITIONAL CAPACITY.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
THE LANDFILL SITE EAST OF TOWN HAS BEEN ORDERED TO CLOSE BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BECAUSE OF POLLUTION PROBLEMS.
ITS PLACE A TRASH COMPACTING AND TRANSFER STATION IS LOCATED ON

39

IN

�SCALE

0

\400

2800

JN(_
~
__ _,

-

:I __)n·:.:-:-1~
l ___ - .
-

0
--------------

-L-=-=--=-==-l-

~

SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
---- 6-8 IN.SEWER
-

l0-121N.SEWER
■

~

~

:J

.J

~

SEWAGE TREATMENT

~~

~L~IN~N~=====-=:;
7

-----

-----------

�THE OLD LANDFILL SITE EAST OF THE CITY ON GRAND RIVER AVENUE.

THIS

FACILITY WILL HANDLE ALL THE WASTE GENERATED IN THE WILLIAMSTON
AREA AND WILL TRANSPORT IT TO A LARGER,
LANDFILL OPERATION.

41

MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITED

�TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

COMMUNITY LOCATION HISTORICALLY HAS RESULTED AT POINTS ALONG
TRANSPORTATION ROUTES, NOTABLY WHERE TWO OR MORE TRANSPORTATION
LINES MET OR AT POINTS ALONG RIVERS WHERE NATURAL RESOURCES WERE
SUFFICIENT ENOUGH SO THAT A LIVELIHOOD COULD GE DERIVED FROM
THEIR USAGE.

WILLIAMSTON IS NO EXCEPTION,

FALLING ALONG THE OLD

GRAND RIVER PLANK ROAD, WHICH ORIGINATED AS A TRAIL FOLLOWING
THE EVEN GRADES OF THE RED CEDAR VALLEY THROUGH THE AREA BETWEEN
GRAND RAPIDS AND DETROIT.
THE ROADS IN SOUTHERN MICHIGAN,

AS INDEED IN MOST OF MICHIGAN,

DEVELOPED ON THE ORIGINAL RECTANGULAR LAND SURVEY PRACTICES OF
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVED AT THAT

TIME RESULTED IN THE TOWNSHIP AND COUNTY ROAD SYSTEMS WHICH ARE
EVIDENT TODAY.

THESE ROADS,

IN ADDITION TO THOSE LAID OUT ALONG

THE OLD TRAILS, PROVIDE THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARES WHICH SERVE THE
AREA.

LATER, AS PLATTING TOOK PLACE TO FORM MUNICIPALITIES,

RIGHTS-OF-WAY WERE SET ASIDE TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE UNDEVELOPED
PROPERTIES.

THESE RIGHTS-OF-WAY INTERCONNECTED WITH THE MAJOR

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTS.

As A RESULT,

THE SYSTEM OF STREETS AND

THOROUGHFARES BECAME THE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMMUNITY.

IN THE

FUTURE, AS THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPS AND EXPANDS, SO MUST THIS
FRAMEWORK.
THE EXISTING STREET AND THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM
THE WILLIAMSTON STREET AND THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM SHOWN ON MAP 10 JS
BASICALLY A MINOR ATERIAL SYSTEM WITH AN INTERWEBBING OF COLLECTOR
AND LOCAL STREETS, WHICH FOR THE MOST PART FOLLOW A RECTANGULAR
PATTERN•

PR! MARY ROADS WITHIN THE SYSTEM ARE GRAND RI VER AVENUE!

M-43, WHICH IS A FEDERAL-AID PRIMARY ROUTE;

AND WILLIAMSTON ROAD,

A FEDERAL-AID SECONDARY (COUNTY} ROUTE.
INTERSTATE-96, WHICH DOES NOT DIRECTLY SERVE THE COMMUNITY BUT
PROVIDES INTERCHANGE WITH WILLIAMSTON ROAD,
INTERSTATE SYSTEM.

42

IS PART OF THE MAJOR

�MITCHELL

SCALE

0

MAP 10
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

======

FEDERAL INTERSTATE
_,.....,.....,.._.... PRIMARY ROAD
- - - - - SECONDARY ROAD
1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 C 8 0 RAILROAD

z

~

~

&lt;t

:J
_j
~

LINN

1400

2800

�MINOR ARTERIAL ROADS SERVING THE AREA ARE BASICALLY COUNTY ROADS
SUCH AS ROWLEY AND ZIMMER.

THESE FACILITIES ARE FOR THE MOST

PART MAINTAINED BY THE INGHAM COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION.

THE

REMAINING STREETS IN THE SYSTEM ARE COLLECTOR AND LOCAL STREETS
GENERALLY SERVING LOCAL COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES.
RECENT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LOCAL STREET SYSTEM
THE CITY HAS PURSUED AN EXTENSIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVER
RECENT YEARS, WITH THE INSTALLATION OF CURB AND GUTTER AND
BITUMINOUS SURFACING ON MANY STREETS.
PART BY GENERAL OBLIGATION REVENUES

THIS PROGRAM WAS FUNDED IN
AS WELL AS SPECIAL

ASSESSMENTS PLACED AGAINST PROPERTY OWNERS,

AND HAS RESULTED IN

A STREET SYSTEM WITH RELATIVELY FEW DEFICIENCIES.
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
LITTLE TRAFFIC VOLUME INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE WITH RESPECT TO
THE LOCAL THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM.

THAT WHICH IS AVAILABLE IS

INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE HIGHWAYS
AND TRANSPORTATION FOR LOCATIONS CLOSE TO ZIMMER ROAD,

WILLIAMSTON

ROAD AND AT THE EASTERN TRAILER PARK ALONG GRAND RIVER,
ALONG WILLIAMSTON ROAD AT THE INTERCHANGE WITH 1-96.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES, AS WOULD BE EXPECTED,

AS WELL AS

THE HIGHEST

ARE ON GRAND RIVER AT THE

INTERSECTION OF WILLIAMSTON ROAD OR PUTNAM STREET.

VOLUMES ON

GRAND RIVER AVENUE REACHED THE VICINITY OF 10,000 VEHICLES IN BOTH
DIRECTIONS PER DAY.

THE LOWEST VOLUME RECORDED WAS ALONG

WILLIAMSTON ROAD ALONG THE INTERCHANGE OF 1-96.

OTHER HEAVY

VOLUMES OCCUR ALONG GRAND RIVER IN THE DIRECTION OF EAST LANSING,
BRIDGE CROSSING
OF PARTICULAR NOTE IN THIS SECTION ARE THE PROBLEMS AT PUTNAM
STREET AND THE C&amp;O RAILROAD, AND THE LIMITED CIRCULATION POTENTIAL
TO NORTH WILLIAMSTON DUE TO THE SINGLE BRIDGE CROSSING ON PUTNAM
STREET.

THE SEVERITY OF THE SINGLE BRIDGE CROSSING SITUATION rs

FURTHER AFFECTED BY THE DETERIORATED NATURE OF THAT PARTICULAR
STRUCTURE.

NEW BRIDGES QVER THE RED CEDAR RIVER ARE CONTAINED

WITHIN THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN TO ALLEVIATE THIS PROBLEM AREA.

44

�MASS TRANSPORTATION
WILLIAMSTON IS NOT PRESENTLY SERVED BY ANY BUS OR PASSENGER TRAIN
SYSTEM.

BUT WITH CONTINUALLY INCREASING ENERGY COSTS,

THIS FORM

OF TRANSPORTATION COULD BECOME A REALITY.

THE CAPITAL AREA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (CATA) HAS DONE
FEASIBILITY STUDIES ON EXTENDING COMMUTER BUS SERVICE TO
WILLIAMSTON.

PRESENTLY THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MUCH OF A

DEMAND FOR THIS TYPE OF SERVICE.
ANOTHER POSSIBILITY,

ALTHOUGH LONGER RANGE, WOULD BE COMMUTER

TRAIN SERVICE BETWEEN LANSING AND DETROIT THROUGH WILLIAMSTON.
LANDS EAST OF THE CITY LIMITS,
BE

ALONG THE RAILROAD TRACKS, SHOULD

RESERVED FOR THIS POSSIBILITY.

LAND FOR SERVICE BUILDINGS

AND PARKING WOULD FIT IN LOGICALLY AS AN EXTENSION OF THE PRESENT
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE RAILROAD.

�i
I

I

�INTRODUCTION

WHAT WILL WILLIAMSTON BE LIKE IN 20 YEARS?
VALUES BE PROTECTED?

WILL THE PROPERTY

WILL ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICES BE AVAILABLE?

WILL THERE BE ENOUGH PARK SPACE?

THESE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE

QUESTIONS WHICH THE CITY OF WILLIAMSTON PLANNING COMMISSION HAS
BEEN GRAPPLING WITH.

THESE AND MANY OTHER POINTS HAVE BEEN

DISCUSSED, DEBATED AND ANALYZED IN DETAIL UNTIL THE PLANNING
COMMISSION HAS DECIDED ON THE PLAN YOU ARE NOW READING.
THE PLAN

IS A TOOL TO GUIDE CITIZENS, DEVELOPERS AND DECISION-

MAKERS WITHIN WILLIAMSTON ON WHEN AND HOW THE CITY SHOULD GROW.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BEEN SENSITIVE TO AND RECOGNIZED
THREE POINTS IN DEVELOPING THIS PLAN.

FIRST, THE SUBSTANTIAL

PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INVESTMENTS IN HOMES, BUSINESS AND SERVICES
HAVE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST ANY FORM OF DEGRADATION.

FUTURE

PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INVESTMENTS HAVE TO BE MADE IN THE MOST
EFFICIENT MANNER.

AND THIRDLY, WILLIAMSTON SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE

AN ENJOYABLE AND COMFORTABLE PLACE IN WHICH TO LIVE AND GROW.
THIS PLAN IS NOT SET IN CONCRETE--IT IS INTENDED TO BE FLEXIBLE
IN ORDER TO MEET THE DYNAMIC CHANGES OF A GROWING COMMUNITY.

IT

OUTLINES AREAS WHERE NEW DEVELOPMENT COULD BE MOST ECONOMICALLY
SERVICED WITHOUT ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT.
THE PLAN INDICATES THE INTENSITY OF NEW GROWTH TO PROTECT THE
EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS AND TO CREATE NEW
NEIGHBORHOODS WHICH ARE SAFE AND ENJOYABLE.

COMMERCIAL AND

INDUSTRIAL GROWTH ALSO HAVE SPACE ALLOCATED FOR THEIR LOCATIONS•
BESIDES THESE GENERAL POINTS,

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION PRESENTS

SOME OF THE MORE IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THE PLAN FOR WILLIAMSTON.
FLOODPLAIN/GREENBELT
THE APRIL,

1975 FLOOD CAUSED THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OF DAMAGES TO

HOMES AND BUSINESSES IN THE CITY.

AN ACCURATE MAPPING FROM

AERIALS DURING PEAK FLOWS IS AN INTEGRAL ELEMENT OF THE PLAN.
THE INUNDATED AREAS ALONG THE RED CEDAR RIVER AND DEER CREEK
SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM URBANIZATION AT ALL COSTS.

LAND USE

ACTIVITIES LIKE McCORMICK PARK AND THE COUNTRY CLUB ARE EXCELLENT
EXAMPLES OF USES WHICH FLOODPLAINS CAN ABSORB.
48

�FUTURE
LAND USE PLAN
PHASE Ir

:!t~~~~r,~~~;~~!!:.

.[JJ LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

fflil MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
■ HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

fJjJ COMMERCIAL
~ INDUSTRIAL

. ~.·.~-:

.\ _.:·•.:_;:-~-~~.~~~

Iii INSTITUTIONAL
~ RECREATIONAL

Ei?ITI OPEN

SPACES

OCTOBER 1976
WILLIAMSTON

PLANNING

�CONTIGUOUS DEVELOPMENT
THIS PLAN IS BOTH A YEAR 2000 AND A MUCH LONGER RANGE PLAN.

VACANT

LANDS WHICH ARE ADJACENT TO DEVELOPED LAND SHOULD BE USED FIRST.
THIS WILL SAVE TAX DOLLARS THROUGH INCREMENTAL EXTENSION OF SEWER,
WATER AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.

THE AREAS WHICH ARE DESIGNATED BY A

"CROSS HATCHED" OVERLAY ON MAP 11
BE DEVELOPED

□ NL Y

(THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN) SHOULD

WNEN THE OTHER PROPOSED GROWTH AREAS ARE FILLED,

THE FOLLOWING CHART (PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL LAND ALLOCATIONS) SHOWS
HOW MUCH RESIDENTIAL GROWTH CAN BE ANTICIPATED BY THE YEAR 2000,
THE PLAN MAP USES THESE ACREAGES FOR THE FIRST PHASE OF GROWTH
PLACEMENT.

THE SECOND PHASE, OR THE LONG-RANGE PLAN ELEMENTS, HAS

A POPULATION-HOLDING CAPACITY OF AN ADDITIONAL 1,500 PEOPLE.
THESE SECOND PHASE AREAS ARE INCLUDED ON THE PLAN MAP TO BRING
CONTINUITY TO THE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEME OF THE AREA.

IT IS

POSSIBLE THAT SOME OF THESE SECOND PHASE AREAS WI LL DEVELOP PRIOR
TO FIRST PHASE AREAS BECAUSE OF DEVELOPER CHOICE OR TOWNSHIP
ACTION.

BUT THESE SECOND PHASE AREAS,

IF DEVELOPED, WILL HAVE TO

BEAR THE COSTS OF PROVIDING SEWER AND WATER SERVICE CAPACITY TO
"LEAPFROGGED" INNER LANDS.
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
THE FUTURE OF THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT CCBD&gt;
IMPORTANCE TO THE CITY OF WILLIAMSTON.

IS OF GREAT

THE CBD IS IDENTIFIED AS

"WILLIAMSTON" BY PEOPLE WHO LIVE ELSEWHERE.

IT IS IN THIS AREA

WHERE FAMILY SHOPPING NEEDS FOR GOODS AND SERVICES AND CITY
ADMINISTRATIVE NEEDS MUST BE MET.

IT IS ALSO THE LOCATION OF

MANY

SOCIAL ACTIVITIES, AND IN WILLIAMSTON THE CBO PROVIDES A LARGE
PART OF THE TAX BASE.
THE CBD HAS MANY ADJUSTMENTS TO MAKE IN THE PLANNING PERIOD.
SUCCESS OR FAILURE IN CREATING AN INCREASINGLY ATTRACTIVE SHOPPI NG '
CENTER CAN AFFECT THE GROWTH RATE OF THE CITY ITSELF •

.

THE CBD HAS HAD DIFFICULTIES IN CHANGING TO MEET MODERN SHOPPING l
DEMANDS.

ITS SMALL STORES,

NEED FOR INCREASED PARKING AND NEED

FOR PRESENTING A MORE ATTRACTIVE SHOPPING LOCATION HAVE LED TO I~
COMPE::TITIVE DECLINE WITH NEWER SHOPPING MALLS.

CITY BUSINESSMEN

HAVE MADE CONSIDERABLE IMPROVEMENTS ON THEIR OWN,
DO IT ALONE.
50

BUT THEY CANNOT

�CITY OF WILLIAMSTON

PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL LAND ALLOCATIONS

DENSITY

DWELLING
UNITS/
NET ACRE

1
2

PROJECTED
POPULATION

PERCENTAGE
POPULATION
DISTRIBUTION

3

4

POPULATION PER
DWELLING
UNIT

DWELLING
UNITS

5

NET
ACRES

GRoss
ACRES

6

7

PLAN
DESIGN

HIGH

8

232

20

2.6

89

11 • 1

13.9

16.7

MEDIUM

4

464

40

3.0

154

38.5

48. 1

57.8

Low

2

464

40

3.5

132

66.0

82.5

99.0

-

1, 160

100%

-

375

115. 6

134.5

173.5

TOTALS
(J1

.....

1

WILLIAMSTON ZONING ORDINANCE

2 SEE POPULATION PROJECTION SECTION OF THIS DOCUMENT
3

DETERMINED BY WILLIAMSTON PLANNING COMMISSION

4

5

8ASED ON ANALYSIS BY THE TRI-COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
PROJECT POPULATION
NET ACRES=

1 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE
POPULATION PER DWELLING UNIT

6
7

GROSS ACRES= NET ACRES

X

125%

(ALLOWANCE FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS)

PLAN ACRES= GROSS ACRES X

120%

(EXPANSION AND CHOICE FACTOR FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND AREAS)

�WILLIAMSTON HAS TO TAKE A STRONG STAND AND NOT ALLOW FURTHER
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE THE CBD.

THE PRESENT

VACANCIES CAN

BE FILLED BY SPECIALTY SHOPS, RESTAURANTS, OFFICES AND OTHER
GENERAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES.
To MEET THESE NEEDS, THE PLAN CALLS FOR LIMITATIONS ON THE LOCATION
OF COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES.

THE CONTINUED STRIPPING OF BUSINESSES

ALONG GRAND RIVER AVENUE WASTES LAND,

CAUSES TRAFFIC HAZARDS AND

ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE AESTHETIC APPEAL OF THE COMMUN I TY.

TO COMBAT

THESE PROBLEMS THE PLAN CALLS FOR ALL NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO
OCCUR WITHIN THE CBO.

THE EXISTING BUSINESSES OUTSIDE THE CBD WOULD

CONTINUE TO OPERATE, BUT AS THEY BECOME OBSOLETE OR DESTROYED THE
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION WOULD OVERRULE THEIR RECONSTRUCTION,
THIS WILL TAKE MANY YEARS TO REALIZE, BUT EVENTUALLY RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURES WILL REPLACE BUSINESSES OUTSIDE THE CBD AS THEY BECOME
DEFUNCT.
INQUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
WILLIAMSTON HAS ADEQUATE LAND TO MEET ANTICIPATED INDUSTRIAL GRW0TH
FOR MANY YEARS PAST THE YEAR 2000.

EXISTING INDUSTRIAL AREAS WEST

OF TOWN AND TWO TRACTS SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED
AS EXPANSION AREAS.

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE CITY IS AT A

COMPETITIVE DISADVANTAGE WITH LARGER URBAN AREAS FOR ATTRACTING
NEW INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT.

THE MOST WHICH WILLIAMSTON CAN EXPECT

IS POSSIBLE WAREHOUSING AND DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS, SMALL MACHINETYPE SHOPS AND GROWTH OF EXISTING INDUSTRIES.
ALTHOUGH THE CITY CANNOT EXPECT IMMEDIATE INDUSTRIAL GROWTH, IT
SHOULD MAKE SURE THAT THE LAND IDENTIFIED FOR THAT PURPOSE BE
PRESERVED.

THESE AREAS SHOULD NOT BE ENCROACHED UPON BY OTHER

TYPES OF LAND USE ACTIVITY.

THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF THESE sJTES

REQUIRES RELATIVE UNHAMPERED USAGE.

HOMES OR BUSINESSES WITHIN

THESE AREAS WOULD LIMIT OPTIONS TO INDUSTRIAL CONCERNS ON THEIR
HOURS OF OPERATION, STORAGE NEEDS AND AESTHETIC CONCERNS.

52

�TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ONCE IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED WHERE PEOPLE WILL BE LIVING, WORKING,
AND SHOPPING,

IT IS THEN POSSIBLE TO PLAN A ROAD SYSTEM WHICH WILL

ALLOW THEM TO MOVE EFFICIENTLY BETWEEN THEIR DESTINATIONS WITH A
MAXIMUM OF EASE AND SAFETY.

SINCE ANY ROAD IS EXPENSIVE AND WILL

BE A PERMANENT PART OF THE COMMUNITY, PLANNING HAS TO CONSIDER
LONG-RANGE CIRCULATION AND CAPACITY NEEDS.

TRAFFIC IN AND AROUND WILLIAMSTON WILL INCREASE IN YEARS TO COME.
UNLESS IT IS PROPERLY HANDLED,

THIS TRAFFIC WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT

OTHERWISE DESIRABLE PARTS OF THE CITY.

Too MUCH TRAFFIC IN THE

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WILL HAMPER SHOPPING AND POSE ADDITIONAL
SAFETY PROBLEMS.

INADEQUATE ACCESS WILL DIMINISH THE APPEAL OF

OTHERWISE ATTRACTIVE RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

A PROPERLY DESIGNED MAJOR

ROAD SYSTEM WILL HELP DEFINE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, COMMERCIAL
AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS AND WILL MINIMIZE CONFLICTS BETWEEN THEM.

MAP 11 CONTAINS THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR WILLIAMSTON.

IT IS

DESIGNED TO LESSEN CONGESTION IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BY
DIVERTING NORTH/SOUTH TRAFFIC.

THE PLAN OPENS MANY AREAS TO THE

SOUTH AND WEST OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT.

AND,

THE PLAN DESIGNATES

HOW EXTENSIVE THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WILL HAVE TO BE TO HANDLE
ANTICIPATED DEMAND.

THE PLAN DESIGNATES THREE CATEGORIES OF ROADS:
.ERIMARY ROAD:

A ROAD WHICH BRINGS TRAFFIC TO AND FROM PRINCIPAL

TRAFFIC GENERATORS WITHIN THE CITY AND IMPORTANT RURAL ROUTES.
WHILE PRIMARY ROADS ARE DESIGNED TO MOVE TRAFFIC,
ALSO PERFORM A SECONDARY LAND SERVICE FUNCTION.

THEY NORMALLY
THUS,

ALTHOUGH

ABUTTING PROPERTIES WILL HAVE FREE ACCESS, PARKING AND LOADING
HAVE TO BE RESTRICTED OR PROHIBITED TO IMPROVE CAPACITY.
RIVER AVENUE IS THE ONLY PRIMARY ROAD IN THE PLAN.

53

GRAND

�~

w

NEW
BRIDGE

&lt;t

&lt;t

w
w

t-

~

~'

,.__ ~I

Ii

ii

SCALE

~

z
z

:)

&gt;

&lt;t

Q.

(D

p, ......_

....UJ

z

z

I

I\

uy17 1

CHURCH _ .

II

0

I
]_

I

·

I

POT

MASS=TRANSIT
~NSFERSITE
a::
w

~

-

1 WALLACE

--

-,

ii

IL

ii

U

J

'I

N

MAP NO.

TRANSPOR/fATION

PL

.

z
~
(/)

-

~

&lt;t

:J
_J

i

LINN

~~----

PROPO
HIGHWAY
PRIMARY
MINOR ARTERIAL- - COLLECTOR - - -

EXISTING

:E

1400

2800

�MINOR ARTERIAL ROAD:

MINOR ARTERIAL ROADS ARE DESIGNED TO CARRY

THE INTERNAL TRAFFIC MOVEMENT WITHIN A DESIGNATED AREA SUCH AS A
SUBDIVISION.

THESE STREETS SHOULD NOT HANDLE LONG TRIPS AND ARE

NOT NECESSARILY CONTINUOUS FOR ANY GREAT LENGTH.

THE MAIN MINOR

ARTERIAL ROADS WITHIN THE PLAN ARE WILLIAMSTON, ROWLEY
ROWLEY EXTENDED TO ZIMMER)

COLLECTOR ROADS:

(AND

AND LINN ROADS.

COLLECTOR ROADS ARE PRIMARY DESIGNED TO SERVE

ABUTTING PROPERTIES BUT THEY ALSO HAVE THE CAPACITY TO MOVE TRAFFIC
IN AND OUT OF AN AREA.

THE FOLLOWING CHART SUMMARIZES THE CROSS-SECTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
OF THESE ROAD TYPES.

THE CHART ALSO INCLUDES THE REQUIREMENTS FOR

LOCAL ROADS.

TYPE;;

NUMBER AND
PARKING
WIDTH OF
RIGHT OF
PAVEMENT
TRAVEL LANES
L8~1;;S
WAY. WIQit!
WIDTt!

LOCAL

66

1

22'-24'

COLLECTOR

66

1

34'

2

@

12

MINOR
ARTERIAL

86'

1

2

@

12 '

48'

4

@

12 '

PRIMARY

100 1 -120'

44

1

10 '
2

@

SIDEWALK
IF PROVIDED 5 '

NONE

IF PROVIDED 5 '

BARRIER

5

10 '

NONE

CURB &amp;
GUTTER

BARRIER

t

5 t WIDER IN
COMMERCIAL
AREAS

BARRIER

OTHER HIGHLIGHTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN INCLUDE ANOTHER SORELY
NEEDED RIVER CROSSING.

IT IS PROPOSED THAT THIS OCCUR ONE AND A

QUARTER MILES EAST OF THE PRESENT BRIDGE.

THE ROADWAY FOR THIS

BRIDGE WILL THEN HOOKUP TO RAILROAD ROAD AND ROWLEY ROAD.

A

COLLECTOR ROAD RUNNING EAST/WEST FROM ZIMMER ROAD TO MEECH IS ALSO
PROPOSED TO OPEN UP THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE COMMUNITY.

il1PLEMENTA TI ON
IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
WILL NECESSARILY REQUIRE NOT ONLY LOCAL INPUT BUT THE FULL
COOPERATION OF THE INGHAM COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION,

AS MUCH OF THESE

FACILITIES WILL BE DEVELOPED PRIMARILY IN RURAL AREAS OR WILL BE

55

�SCALE

1400

0

J~

2800

f;llrli]l

.·,n!f

~

--.__

_________ I\

Ii

II

l~b1~ "'-~'.):i;/;-JN'
(~QD;c;;!::J
"){"!:}'.
~,-..;;::::,-. . ;:_

i~[t_

GRA~R flVER AVE.

0

------

-----------

MAP 13
COMMUNITY FACILITIES
-

RECREATION (PAGES 35-37)

(\?t:f;j\
,:::3.~; &gt;:,:·

WATER SUPPLY SERVICE AREA
( PAGES 37-38)

-

TRANSFER SITE - SOLID WASTE
( PAGES 39-40)

0

ill;-

11~

I

~~

LINN

7

c

~

r

I

�MAJOR THOROUGHFARES.

RIGHTS-OF-WAY,

HOWEVER,

SHOULD BE SET ASIDE

AS LANDS ADJACENT ARE DEVELOPED FOR ANY PURPOSE.

WHEREVER POSSIBLE,

DEVELOPERS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO BUILD THE NECESSARY FACILITIES.

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP IS JUST ONE COMPONENT OF THE TOTAL
PLAN FOR WILLIAMSTON.
LAND USE TYPES.

THAT MAP INDICATES THE LOCATION OF DIFFERENT

MAP 12, THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLAN,

INDICATES

HOW THE DIFFERENT LAND USE TYPES SHOULD BE SERVICED.

MAP 12 IS A COMPOSITE OF THE RECREATION, WATER AND GOVERNMENTAL
BUILDING PLANS

DISCUSSED IN THE SECTION OF THIS REPORT TITLED

THE BUILDINGS.

ONE SECTION IS DELETED AT THIS TIME THOUGH.

THE

PLAN FOR THE SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND LOCATION OF NEW
INTERCEPTORS IS BEING PREPARED BY CAPITAL CONSULTANTS OF LANSING.
THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE FORTHCOMING IN 1977 AND SHOULD BE
INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN AT THAT TIME.

THE PREVIOUS SECTION DISCUSSED IN GENERAL WHAT THE PLAN IS ABOUT.
THE FOLLOWING SECTION, GOALS AND POLICIES,
IN WILLIAMSTON GETS QUITE SPECIFIC.

FOR GUIDING DEVELOPMENT

IT OUTLINES IN DETAIL WHAT

TYPES OF PROTECTION HAVE TO BE AFFORDED DIFFERENT TYPES OF LAND
USE ACTIVITIES,

HOW LAND USE ACTIVITIES INTERRELATE, AND WHAT

TYPES OF SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SHOULD RECEIVE.

THESE GOALS AND

POLICIES ARE TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLAN MAP TO JUDGE
THE ADEQUACY OF PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS OR ACTIONS WHICH THE
CITY COUNCIL HAS TO TAKE IN EXTENDING PUBLIC SERVICES.

57

�DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY DEFINES POLICY AS "A DEFINITE COURSE OR METHOD
OF ACTION SELECTED FROM AMONG ALTERNATIVES AND IN LIGHT OF GIVEN
CONDITIONS TO GUIDE AND DETERMINE PRESENT AND FUTURE DECISIONS."
PREVIOUS SECTIONS OF THIS REPORT HAVE HIGHLIGHTED THE EXISTING
CONDITION OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN WILLIAMSTON.

THIS SECTION BEGINS

THE PROCESS OF OUTLINING A COURSE OF ACTION TO GUIDE FUTURE
DECISIONS AS THEY RELATE TO THE CHANGE AND GROWTH OF THE CITY.
THE FIRST STEP IN THE PROCESS IS TO SET BASIC GOALS.

THE

WILLIAMSTON PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED FOUR BASIC GOALS IN GUIDING
THEIR DECISIONS IN THE DESIGN OF THE PLAN.

THEY ARE AS FOLLOWS:

EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMY OF DEVELOPMENT - To ASSURE MAXIMUM
BENEFIT TO THE PUBLIC FROM PUBLIC EXPENDITURES AND PRIVATE
INVESTMENTS IN THE AREA THROUGH ECONOMICAL EMPLOYMENT OF
RESOURCES, PREVENTION OF DUPLICATION AND WASTE,

AND THE

ENHANCEMENT OF PROPERTY VALUES.
COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN GOVERNMENTAL UNITS - ALL
FUNCTIONS WHICH ARE NOT eFFICIENT AND ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE
FOR ONE LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE SHIFTED TO THAT LEVEL
MOST LIKELY TO INSURE THEIR OPERATION AND FULFILLMENT OF
FUNCTION.
ECONOMIC PROSPERITY - To ENCOURAGE GROWTH AND DIVERSIFICATION
OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES

TO ASSURE A PLEASANT,

DESIRABLE AND

ATTRACTIVE COMMUNITY IN WHICH TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY.
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN -

PREVENT THE MISUSE OF LAND BY

ESTABLISHING A PATTERN TO GUIDE FUTURE ORDERLY GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT.

(NONCONTIGUOUS DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE CONTAINED

AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDED INTO EFFICIENT SERVICE UNITS.)
THE ABOVE GOALS PROVIDE THE BASIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE ACTUAL POLICIES
ON WHICH THE PLAN IS DESIGNED.

POLICIES ARE THE STATEMENTS WHICH

SET FORTH THE DESIRABLE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN TO PROMOTE ORDERLY AND
EFFICIENT USE OF THE LAND.

THE POLICIES WHICH FOLLOW WILL THEN BE

CONVERTED TO GRAPHIC FORM IN THE ACTUAL PLAN MAP.

58

��h

DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT
PROTECTING POLICIES
RESIDENTIAL
1.

RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN RELATIVELY EASY
ACCESS TO WORK, SHOPPING AND RECREATIONAL AREAS.
- FURTHER, NEW DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE CONTIGUOUS TO EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT.

2.

RESIDENTIAL LAND USES SHOULD COMPLEMENT AND ACCENT TOPOGRAPHY,
SOILS, WOODLOTS AND OTHER NATURAL FEATURES.
- TO PRESERVE SPECIAL TERRAIN FEATURES AS COMMON OPEN SPACE.
- To PROVIDE FOR NATURAL DRAINAGE.
- TO PRESERVE WETLANDS AND ACQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS.
- To FORBID OBSTRUCTION OF FLOODWAYS AND FLOODPLAINS.
- TO PRESERVE FENCE ROWS AND WOODLOTS.
- THEREBY MAKING FOR MORE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING DEVELOPMENT
AND REDUCING PUBLIC COSTS BY ALLOWING THE MATURAL FEATURES OF
LAND TO ASSIMILATE RUNOFF.

3.

RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHOULD BE DEVELOPED WITHIN THE PARAMETERS
OF ZONING, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES.
- To INSURE PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE.
TO HELP BRING ABOUT THE PATTERN OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
THAT IS DESIRABLE.
- TO PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM STANDARD OF QUALITY.
- To INSURE THAT RESIDENTIAL LAND USES ARE COMPATIBLE WITH
OTHER FUNCTIONAL USES OF LAND.

4.

ALL RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH THE BASIC

FACILITIES OF WATER, SEWER, SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND OTHER
REQUIREMENTS TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE.
- TO PREVENT POLLUTION OF WATER, SOIL AND GROUNDWATER.
- TO REALIZE ECONOMIC UTILITY INSTALLATION.
- TO MAKE OPTIMUM USE OF CENTRALIZED UTILITY SYSTEMS.

60

�(/'

~·,·:_
J

\ : W.ArER
! \

'-'

____-··_-_-_- ---·

,:.

SUPPL..Y

" ..
,.,-

-

SEWA~E

TREATMENT

.STORM SEWE:.~
5.

ALL TYPES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE PROVIDED, RANGING
FROM LARGE LOW-DENSITY UNITS TO HIGH-DENSITY MULTIPLE-FAMILY
USES,

TO SATISFY AND ACCOMMODATE ALL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL GROUPS

WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.

- To PRODUCE RESIDENTIAL AREAS WHICH POSSESS VISUAL DIVERSITY
AND INTEREST.

- To ENCOURAGE DEVELOPERS TO BUILD IN SUBSTANTIAL INCREMENTS
WITH AN APPROPRIATE MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS.

61

�INCOMPATIBLE LANO US€5,
: : : ; : BRIG HT UQHT.S
MDI -

/~~

-

~~~1-U.i.J..J..U.

.~~
. ~,-11r~T

DfR111ll~++

NOISE

Q. ~--~il13m
6.

RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO INTEGRATE COMPATIBLE
LAND USES IN PROPER PROPORTION AND BALANCE, TO PROTECT AGAINST
ACTIVITIES WHICH PRODUCE INCOMPATIBLE NOISE,

DUST, ODORS OR

HEAVY TRAFFIC.
- To PROVIDE FOR NECESSARY SUPPORT LAND USES AT A SCALE
SUITABLE TO THE RESIDENTIAL AREA.
- TO PROVIDE FOR SCREENING OR SEPARATION OF NONCOMPATIBLE
LAND USES WHEN CLOSE PROXIMITY CANNOT BE AVOIDED.

- To PROTECT INDIVIDUALS FROM UNDUE FINANCIAL HARDSHIP DUE
TO NEGATIVE LAND USE IMPACTS.
COMMERCIAL
1.

THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SHOULD BE ATTRACTIVE AND DESIGNED
TO MEET THE MAJORITY OF GOODS AND SERVICE NEEDS FOR THE
COMMUNITY.
- TO PROVIDE A FOCUS FOR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES.
- To CONTINUE AND BUILD UPON THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF THE CBD,

62

�2.

INCOMPATIBLE NONCOMMERCIAL USES SHOULD BE ELIMINATED OR NOT
INCLUDED IN COMMERCIAL AREAS.
- To PRESERVE THE COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AND MAINTAIN A
FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.

3.

COMMERCIAL AREAS SHOULD BE DEVELOPED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THEY
DO NOT HARM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
- To PROVIDE BUFFERS TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
- TO SEPARATE OPERATIONS REQUIRING HEAVY AUTO ACCESS FROM

AE~ID C fU1if'\\.

A~f: A

·r o ~ .~PRi;5!iWA'-('
tN1"~RCHM}'-4i:.-

INDUSTRIAL
l.

INDUSTRIAL SITES AND PARKS SHOULD BE LOCATED IN AREAS AFFORDING
DIRECT ACCESS TO EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION ROUTES.
- To PROVIDE ALL TYPES OF INDUSTRIES WITH PLANNED AND
STRATEGIC SITES WITHIN THE OVERALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
PATTERNS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT.

63

�2.

INDUSTRIAL SITES OR LOCATIONS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES OF POWER,
WATER, SEWER AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SHOULD FORM THE BASIS FOR
DEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION.
- TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC PROTECTION AGAINST WATER AND
AIR POLLUTION.
- TO CONTROL SPECULATION AND PREMATURE DEVELOPMENT OF
INDUSTRIAL SITES.
r

3.

BUFFER ZONES FORMED BY SOME COMBINATION OF OFF-STREET PARKING,
COMMERCIAL USES, PARKS, OPEN SPACE OR AGRICULTURAL USES SHOULD
SEPARATE INDUSTRIAL AREAS FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
- To PROVIDE FOR CONTIGUOUS AREAS OF SERVICE-RELATED LAND
USES NECESSARY TO THE INDUSTRIAL FUNCTION.
- To PROVIDE FOR THE REDUCTION OF IMPACTS WHEN ADEQUATE
SEPARATION OF NONCOMPATIBLE LAND USE CANNOT BE AVOIDED.
- TO PROVIDE A BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING FOR THE
INDUSTRY AND ITS EMPLOYEES.

4.

INDUSTRIAL USES SHOULD BE GROUPED TOGETHER IN SPECIFIC AREAS
OR BELTS WITH ATTRACTIVE SITE PLANNING, LANDSCAPING, BUILDING,
SETBACK AND COVERAGE CONTROLS.
- TO PROVIDE AN AREA ADEQUATE FOR PLANNED SHARING OF
UTILITIES.
- TO PROVIDE AN AREA THAT PERMITS A REASONABLE RESERVE OF
LAND FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.
- To PROTECT THE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS OF OCCUPANT
INDUSTRIES FROM UNCONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT.
- To PROVIDE GUIDELINES AND CONTROLS FOR IMPROVING AND
MAINTAINING HIGH STANDARDS OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND
OPERATION.
- TO INCREASE THE CHOICE OF SPACE AND LOCATION FOR THE
SMALL INDUSTRIAL FIRM.

TRANSPORTATION
1.

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE THE
MOST ECONOMICAL AND EFFICIENT MOVEMENT OF GOODS AND PEOPLE
WITHOUT CONFLICT TO SURROUNDING LAND USES.

64

)

�- TO PROVIDE FOR SAFE AND EFFICIENT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT.
- TO PROVIDE EASY ACCESS FROM MAJOR ROADWAYS TO
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SITES.
- TO MAKE THE BEST USE OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES ON STREET
FACILITIES.
2.

MOTORIZED AND NONMOTORIZED CONFLICTS SHOULD BE MINIMIZED WITHIN

RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
- TO PRESERVE THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA.
- TO PROMOTE SAFETY OF LOCAL RESIDENTS.
- TO PROVIDE FOR EASY ACCESS TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES.
3.

THE UPGRADING, MAINTENANCE AND · REPAIRS OF THE TRANSPORTATION

NETWORK SHOULD BE A CONSTANT PROCESS.
- To INSURE THE USE OF STREETS FOR THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH
THEY ARE DESIGNED AND BEST SUITED.
- To INSURE A MINIMUM IMPACT ON LAND USES.
- To ALLOW EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
EXPANSION.
- To INSURE THE SAFETY AND CONVENIENCE OF USERS.
4.

STREET DESIGN, PARKING AND LOADING FACILITIES SHOULD BE ADJUSTED
TO FIT THE MOVEMENT, VOLUME AND CHARACTER OF TRAFFIC AND THE
ADJOINING USE OF LAND, BOTH PRESENT AND FUTURE.
- To MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATIONRELATED ACTIVITIES ON OTHER FORMS OF LAND USE.
- To PROMOTE TRAFFIC SAFETY.
- To ELIMINATE CONFLICTS WITH TRAFFIC ON LOCAL STREETS.

INSTITUTIONAL
l.

INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES SHOULD BE CENTRALLY LOCATED IN RELATION
TO THE POPULATION THEY WILL SERVE.
- To INSURE EASY ACCESS BY INDIVIDUALS BEING SERVED.
- To ACT AS A FOCUS OF A NEIGHBORHOOD.

2•

COMBINED SCHOOL, PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SHOULD BE
DEVELOPED.
- To INSURE EFFICIENT LAND USE.
- To REDUCE COSTS FOR LAND.
- To REDUCE OVERALL MAINTENANCE COSTS.
65

�3.

INSTITUTIONAL LAND SHOULD BE ADQUIRED OR RESERVED IN ADVANCE
OF, OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN AREA.
- TO INSURE THE AVAILABILITY OF SPACE FOR COMMUNITY NEEDS.
- TO GUIDE GROWTH IN DESIRED DIRECTIONS.

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
1.

ALL MAJOR PARK AND OPEN SPACE LAND USE SHOULD BE COORDINATED

ON A REGIONAL BASIS TO INTEGRATE AN INTERLOCKING NETWORK.
- TO PROVIDE FOR A MIXED CHOICE OF RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES.
- TO REDUCE TOTAL PUBLIC COSTS.
2.

VALUABLE AND IRREPLACEABLE NATURAL RESOURCES SHOULD BE PROTECTED
THROUGH THE USE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE LAND ALLOCATIONS.
- TO PRESERVE NATURAL RESOURCES AND AMENITIES.

3.

PRESERVATION OF SCENIC OR HISTORICAL SITES SHOULD BE A PRIME
FUNCTION OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE.
- TO PRESERVE FEATURES AND ARTIFACTS OF SIGNIFICANCE TO
THE COMMUNITY'S HISTORY AND CULTURE.
- TO PRESERVE NATURAL AMENITIES.

66

�PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

A PLAN WITHOUT A STRATEGY TO IMPLEMENT IT WILL NOT BE REALIZED.
THIS SECTION OF THE WILLIAMSTON PLAN LOOKS AT ACTIONS THE CITIZENS,
PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL CAN TAKE TO COMPLIMENT THE
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLAN.

PLAN IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH EDUCATION
PLANNING COMMISSIONS HAVE THE UNIQUE POWER UNDER MICHIGAN LAW OF
BEING ABLE TO SPEND FUNDS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.

THE PREPARATION

OF BROCHURES AND INFORMATION BULLETINS ON WHAT THE PLAN MEANS FOR
LOCAL CITIZENS WOULD BE OF VALUE TO HEIGHTEN AWARENESS AND RECEIVE
INPUT ON PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS.

PLAN IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH ZONING
THE TRADITIONAL METHOD OF IMPLEMENTING LAND USE PLANS IS THROUGH
THE POWER OF ZONING FOR USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND BULK REQUIREMENTS.
THE PLAN SHOULD BE USED TO GUIDE RE-ZONINGS OF UNDEVELOPED LANDS.
ANOTHER ASPECT WHICH THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHOULD CONSIDER IS
"DOWN-ZONING" PROPERTIES WHICH ARE NOT IN CONFORMANCE TO THE PLAN.
OF PARTICULAR CONCERN IS THE STRIP OF COMMERCIAL ZONING ALONG GRAND
RIVER AVENUE.

THE LAND AREA DESIGNATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS

DISTRICT CC80)

IS ADEQUATE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF COMMERCIAL

EXPANSION FOR THE NEXT TWENTY-FIVE YEARS.

THE COMMERCIAL ASPECT OF

THE PLAN WILL NEVER BE REALIZED IF THE INDISCRIMINATE LOCATION OF
BUSINESSES IS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE OUTSIDE OF THE CBO.

A RE-ZONING

OF THESE LANDS WOULD NOT CONSTITUTE AN ORDER TO STOP PRESENT
BUSINESSES.

THEY WOULD BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE AS NONCONFORMING USES.

THE MAIN RESTRICTION IMPOSED BY NONCONFORMING USE STATUS IS NO
EXPANSION OF OPERATION AND THE REVERSION OF PROPERTY TO RESIDENTIAL
STATUS IF THE OPERATION CEASES FOR A PERIOD OF TIME OR IS DESTROYED.

PLAN

IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS AND INSURANCE

THE CITY IS PRESENTLY ELIGIBLE FOR FLOOD INSURANCE UNDER THE
EMERGENCY PHASE OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM CNFIP)
67

�SPONSORED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
RESIDENTS OF FLOODPRONE AREAS CAN PURCHASE SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE TO
PROTECT THEMSELVES AND THEIR PROPERTY AGAINST FLOOD DAMAGES.

THE

NEXT PHASE OF NFIP WILL ASSIST IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN
FOR WILLIAMSTON.

NFIP REQUIRES THAT AN ACCURATE DELINEATION OF

THE FLOODPLAIN OCCUR CONCURRENTLY WITH THE ADOPTION OF STRICT
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS IN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CITY'S
ELIGIBILITY FOR FLOOD INSURANCE.

PLAN IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING CCIP) CAN BE ENVISIONED AS SHORTRANGE PLANNING.

A CIP ASSESSES THE FUTURE NEEDS AND PROGRAMS; A

FIVE- TO SIX-YEAR SCHEDULE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO STREETS, STORM
AND SANITARY SEWERS; WATER SERVICES, FIRE PROTECTION, RECREATIONAL
SPACE AND OTHER COMMUNITY FACILITY NEEDS.

THE CIP IS AN IMPORTANT

IMPLEMENTATION TOOL DUE TO ITS ASSESSMENT OF CITY BUDGETARY
CONSTRAINTS AS THEY RELATE TO ACCOMMODATING GROWTH.

IT ALSO

ESTABLISHES THE MOST DESIRABLE ECONOMIC SEQUENCE REQUIRED TO
FULFILL PLAN OBJECTIVES.

PLAN IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS
NEW DEVELOPMENT GENERATES TAX DOLLARS BUT IT ALSO COSTS THE CITY

MONEY TO SERVICE THEM.

THE CITY SHOULD TRY TO ENCOURAGE DEVELOP-

MENT WHICH WILL BALANCE TAXES RECEIVED WITH DOLLARS EXPENDED.

THE

TRI-COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION HAS AVAILABLE A TOOL TO
ASSESS COSTS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS, CALLED THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT
COST/REVENUE MODEL.

THIS MODEL WILL PROGRAM OUT THE COSTS OF

CITY SERVICES (POLICE, FIRE, SEWER, WATER AND ROADS) FOR ANY KIND
OF DEVELOPMENT OVER A TEN-YEAR PERIOD.
TAXES RECEIVED,

THEN BY ESTIMATING THE

THE MODEL WILL HELP THE CITY TO DETERMINE IF THEY

WILL BREAK EVEN OR GENERATE A BUDGET EXCESS OR DEFICIT.

THIS

TOOL, WHEN USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CIP, WILL OPEN MANY PRESENTLY
UNKNOWN VARIABLES WHEN EVALUATING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS.

68

�PLAN IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH PERIODIC

REVIEW AND

EVERY PLAN HAS TO ANTICIPATE CONTINGENCIES.

AMENDMENT

CONDITIONS MAY CHANGE

AT ANY TIME WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSUMPTIONS UPON WHICH THE PRESENT
PLAN IS BASED.

To MEET THESE CONTINGENCIES A THOROUGH REVIEW OF

THE PLAN SHOULD BE TAKEN EVERY FOUR OR FIVE YEARS.

THIS REVIEW

SHOULD INCLUDE EVALUATING HOW EFFECTIVELY THE PLAN HAS BEEN USED,
CHANGES IN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS, CHANGES IN POPULATION AND A
PHILOSOPHICAL EVALUATION OF THE PLAN INTENT TO INSURE THAT IT IS
MEETING THE ASPIRATIONS OF THE RESIDENTS OF WILLIAMSTON.

FINALLY, SOMETIMES THE PLAN HAS TO BE AMENDED.

IF SOMEONE PROPOSES

A DEVELOPMENT ON A PARCEL OF LAND NOT DESIGNATED FOR WHAT HE HOPES
TO DO,

THE PROPOSAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED IMMEDIATELY.

THE

FOLLOWING FACTORS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BEFORE MAKING ANY DECISION,
DOES THE PROPOSAL FIT THE INTENT AND SPIRIT OF THE PLAN?
DOES THE PROPOSAL MEET REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE
POLICY PLAN SECTION?
WHAT IMPACT WOULD THE PROPOSAL HAVE ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES?
IF THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE ABOVE CRITERIA AND CAN BE SERVICED
EFFICIENTLY,

THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY WISH TO AMEND THE PLAN.

ONE NOTE OF CAUTION--IF THE PLAN IS TO BE AMENDED, MAKE SURE THE
SECTION OF THE PLAN MAP AROUND THE PROPOSED SITE IS RE-EVALUATED,
BECAUSE MODIFICATIONS MAY HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED.

69

��A

ER SICS
MBI G
, AD
ICHI AN

HO SING CARA
Y~ TI ZATI
WI IAMSTO,

FACILITIE
U E

2,60
86
y

2

IT

2,60
3 1
3 3

.e

AC

HER

AO

6

CY STATU
5

57

U I

RUCTUR

I

1
2

R MORE

M

ILE H ME

R TRAILER

R o

254
5

0

M R

U IT

CC lED
ERO CUPIED

R

ITS

OCCP
ER D
TER 0

ITS
ID
ED

G FAC.

�GENERAL HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
FINANCIAL
WILLIAMSTON,

VALUE
SPECIFIED OWNER OCCUPIED
$ 5,000
LESS THAN
$ 5,000 TO $ 9,999
$10,000 TO $14,999
$15,000 TO $19,999
$20,000 TO $24,999
$25,000 TO $34,999
$35,000 OR MORE
MEDIAN

MICHIGAN

534
7
77
149
135
91

59
16

$16,000

529
WITH ALL PLUMBING FACILITIES
6
$
5,000
LESS THAN
75
$
9,999
$ 5,000 TO
148
$10,000 TO $14,999
134
$19,999
$15,000 TO
91
$24,999
$20,000 TO
75
MORE
OR
$25,000
$16,100
MEDIAN

73

CONTRACT RENT
SPECIFIED RENTER OCCUPIED
LESS THAN $30
$ 30 TO $ 39
$ 40 TO $ 59
$ 60 TO $ 79
$ 80 TO $ 99
$100 TO $149
$150 OR MORE
No CASH RENT
MEDIAN
WITH ALL PLUMBING FACIL.
LESS THAN $40
$ 50 TO $ 59
$ 60 TO $ ':"/9
$ 80 TO $ 99
$100 TO $149
$150 OR MORE
No CASH RENT
MEDIAN

251

7
10
23
44

43
66

39
19

$96
232
6
19
43
43

64
39
18

$98

�SCHOOL INVENTORY
FACILITY

MEMORIAL
ELEMENTARY

GRADES

RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY

K-2

3-5

MIDDLE
SCHOOL

HIGH
SCHOOL

ST MARY'S
SCHOOL

6-8

9_;_12

1-6

YEAR BUILT

1950

1968

1929

1961

1959

ADDITIONS 2:

1959
1961

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

ACRES IN SITE

N

OF CLASSROOMS

N OF PORTABLE
CLASSROOMS

TOTAL CAPACITY
OF TEACHERS

10-COMBINEDSITE

10

30

5

20

18

20

21

6

0

0

3

5

0

555

400

461

602

200

6

(16 WITH
PLAYFIELD)

14 FULL-TIME
2 PART-TIME

23 FULLTIME 23
3 PARTTIME

23 FULLTIME 6
5 PARTTIME

STUDENT/TEACHER
RATIO POLICY

25:1

25: 1

2 5: 1

25:1

25

STUDENT/TEACHER
RATIO ACTUAL

25:1

1 7: 1

21 : 1

21: 1

22:1

PERCENTAGE OF
STUDENTS BUSSED

95%

95%

55%

30%

LIBRARY
FACILITIES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

MULTI-PURPOSE
SPACE

YES

YES

No

No

YES

GYMNASIUM

YES

YES

YES

YES

No

CAFETERIA

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

N

74

r

1

�A.

POPULATION PROJECTION METHODOLOGY
THE POPULATION PROJECTIONS USED IN THIS STUDY ARE BASED ON

U.S. BUREAU OF CENSUS □ BERS SERIES E FOR THE COUNTY CONTROL
TOTALS AND AN INTERNAL COUNTY DISTRIBUTION FORMULA BASED ON
GROWTH RATE WITHIN THAT MINOR CIVIL DIVISION FOR TWO TIME
FRAMES.
THE FOLLOWING OUTLINES THE PROCEDURE IN A SEQUENTIAL
ARRANGEMENT.
PROJECTIONS FOR EACH SUCCEEDING DECADE ARE DONE BY FIRST CALCULATING THE RATE AT WHICH THE MCD (MINOR CIVIL DIVISION)
INCREASED (OR DECREASED)

IN POPULATION OVER THE THREE-YEAR

PERIOD FROM 1970 TO 1973.

THE CENSUS POPULATION IS USED FOR

THE 1970 NUMBER AND ESTIMATES ARE USED FOR THE 1973 NUMBER.
THE RATE OF INCREASE FOR EACH MCD IS:

1973 POPULATION

-

1970 POPULATION

MCD

MCD

WITH A
CEILING .17
FLOOR .015

1970 POPULATION

MCD
ALSO EACH MCD RATE OF GROWTH IS SUBJECT TO MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM
CONSTRAINTS.

THIS HAS THE EFFECT OF TEMPERING ANY EXTREMES THAT

MAY HAVE EXISTED IN THIS THREE YEAR PERIOD, BUT UNLIKELY TO CONTINUE IN THE FUTURE.
NEXT THE RATE AT WHICH EACH OF THE COUNTIES INCREASED IN
POPULATION OVER THE THREE-YEAR PERIOD FROM 1970 TO J973 IS
CALCULATED:
1973 POPULATION

-

1970 POPULATION

COUNTY

COUNTY

RCOUNTY =

1970 POPULATION

COUNTY

*FLOORS AND CEILINGS ARE INSERTED ON THESE GROWTH RATES TO MODIFY
ANY RAPID GROWTH OR EXTREMELY SLOW GROWTH IN PAST.

ALSO SPECIAL

CONSTRAINTS ARE PLACED ON LANSING CITY, LANSING TOWNSHIP, AND
DELHI TOWNSHIP DUE TO ANNEXATIONS.
75

�RATIOS ARE THEN SET UP, GIVING THE GROWTH DURING THE 1970-1973
PERIOD FOR EACH MCD RELATIVE TO THE GROWTH OF THE COUNTY IN
WHICH IT IS CONTAINED.

THESE QUANTITIES ARE THE K'S.
R

_MCD
R

COUNTY
SECONDLY, SIMILAR RATES OF INCREASE AND RATIOS ARE CALCULATED
FOR THE TEN-YEAR PERIOD FROM 1960 TO 1970 USING THE CENSUS
POPULATION FIGURES.

THE RATE AT WHICH EACH MCD INCREASED

DURING 1960-1970 IS:

=

1970 P OPULATION - 1960 POPULATION
_ _
1960 POPULATION

WITH A CEILING .50
FLOOR 07
•

SIMILAR CONSTRAINTS (ALTHOUGH LARGER BECAUSE OVER TEN YEAR
INSTEAD OF THREE YEAR PERIOD) ARE PLACED ON RMCD AS WAS PLACED
RMCD.
ALSO THE RATE AT WHICH EACH OF THE COUNTIES INCREASED DURING
1960-1970 IS:

1970 POPULATION -

1960 POPULATION

1960 POPULATION

RATIOS ARE THEN SET UP GIVING THE GROWTH OF EACH MCD DURING
1960-1970 PERIOD RELATIVE TO THE GROWTH OF THE COUNTY

IT IS CONTAINED.

IN WHICH

THESE QUANTITIES ARE DEFINED ASK.
KMCD =

_R~M~C~D;.__ __
RCOUNTY

THIRD, THE TWO RATIOS KMCD AND KMCD FOR EACH MCD ARE WEIGHTED
BY THE EQUATION:
RATIOMCD

=

3 KMCD + 10 KMCD
13

76

�THE WEIGHTS ARE PLACED ACCORDING TO THE YEAR SPAN FOR
WHICH EACH RESPECTIVE RATIO REPRESENTS.
FOURTH,

THE COUNTY CONTROL TOTALS CCC DEC.N) DERIVED

FROM THE COHORT-SURVIVAL METHOD ARE USED TO PROJECT
COUNTY GROWTH RATES CCR) FOR EACH DECADE.

THESE ARE

CALCULATED BY
&lt;CCPEC N+l - CCDEC

cc

N&gt;

DEC N
FIFTH,

THE PROJECTED GROWTH RATE FOR EACH MCD OVER A DECADE

RELATIVE TO THE COUNTY IN WHICH IT IS CONTAINED CRPGMCD, DEC N)
IS CALCULATED:
RPG MCD, DEC N =
SIXTH,

RATIOMCDCCRCOUNTY)

THE PROJECTED POPULATION (POP.) FOR EACH SUCCEEDING

DECADE IS CALCULATED:
POP.MCD, DEC N +1

=

CRPGMCD, DECN +l) X CPOP.MCD, DEC N)

WHEN N=l POPULATION ESTIMATES 1973
SEVENTH, THE SUM OF THE PROJECTED POPULATIONS OF ALL MCD'S FOR
EACH COUNTY AND FOR EACH DECADE IS CALCULATED:
TOTCOUNTY, DECN = PoP.MCD 1. DEC N + POP.MCD 2, DEC N +
.
EIGHTH,

• . POP.MCDM, DEC N

THE PROJECTED PROPORTION OF THE COUNTY FOR EACH MCD FOR

EACH DECADE IS CALCULATED:
POP
PROPMCD, DEC N =

Mcp.

TOT COUNTY

77

�FINALLY TO FIND ADJUSTED POPULATION CADJ POPMCD)THE PROJECTED
PROPORTION IS MULTIPLIED BY THE PROJECTED COUNTY CONTROL
TOTALS THAT WERE DERIVED BY THE COHORT-SURVIVAL METHOD.
ADJ POPMCD

=

78

PROPMCD, DECN X

CC DEC N

�A COMPREHENSIVE D VELOPMEN
FOR

LAN

HE

CITY OF WIL IAMSTON, MICHIGAN
OCT BER, 1976
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS WHO PARTI IPATED IN THE
COLLECTION AND PREPARATI
F DATA FOR THE PAN
197

1973

LLOYD HAMLIN, CHAIRMAN
GLORIA ALEXANDER, SECRETARY
VICTOR HOGG
KEITH HONEY
ELWOOD LANOIS
WALTER POSEY
DRU ROEHM
DEAN SANDELL
DON ZENAS

HAM I , CHAI MA
HONEY, VIC CHAIRMAN
EN
R TAR
R
G
SARAH H
ET ER
ELW D
I
WAT R
EY
DEAN SA
LL
RAY WATKl S
1976

1975

LLOYD HAMLI , CHAIRMAN
KEITH Ho EY, VIE CHAIRMA
DON ZENAS~ SECRETARY
EDMUND ALCHIN
RAYMOND 8ACHMA
ELWOOD LANDI
WALTER POSEY
DEAN SANDELL
RAY WATKINS

MA
A
A

WA
DEA

CITY A

CITY COUNCIL

WAYE BL SEY
LLOYD HAMLIN
VICTOR HOGG
FRED JAMIESON
DRU ROEHM

INISTRATORS
1976

197

RAYMOND BA MA, MAYR
JAMES SEAT N, MAYR
PRO TM

SA

RAY WA

RAY WATKIN, CITY MANAGER
ORIA ALEXANDER, CITY CLERK/
TREA URER
MILTON STEFFES, ASSE OR
ELLI
WYGANT, PUBLIC W RKS
5 PERINT DENT
STEVEN HUGHE, WASTEW TER
TREATMENT PANT SUPER! TN
RAYMOND M KING, CHI
POLIC

G

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010551">
                <text>Williamston_Comprehensive-Development-Plan_1976</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010552">
                <text>City of Williamston Planning Commission, City of Williamston, Ingham County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010553">
                <text>1976-10</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010554">
                <text>City of Williamston Comprehensive Development Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010555">
                <text>The City of Williamston Comprehensive Development Plan was prepared by the City of Williamston Planning Commission with the technical assistance of Tri-County Regional Planning Committee and Land Planning and Design Association in October 1976.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010556">
                <text>Tri-County Regional Planning Committee (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010557">
                <text>Land Planning and Design Association (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010558">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010559">
                <text>Williamston (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010560">
                <text>Ingham County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010561">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010563">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010564">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010565">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010566">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038468">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54849" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59119">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8524fb52d54b51e5e950832b22fc2d1e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2c5b42cf41d8485abcf48f5ab412e2c6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1010643">
                    <text>'

I' .

CITY Of YAtE
1 i 1 Vv. Mechanic St.
Yale, M ich. 48087

L

'

.'

....

I .
I :_

·. ,·

.·-··:: City of Yale ·
. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
.City of Yale Planning Commission
, Adopted March 21, 1991

I' .
- --

---

~ - -- - -

�COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

City of Yale Planning Commission
Assisted By:
Birchler/ Arroyo Associates
City Planning Consultants
Berkley, Michigan

@

pnnled on recycJed ,,.,-

�CITY OF YALE PLANNING COMMISSION
James Cronin, Chairperson
Steve Anderson
Frederic L Fuller II
Shirley Graves
Albert W. Kovatch
Dale Long
Karen Thorner
Barb Trevino
Harry Wolf
MAYOR
Frederic L Fuller II
CITY COUNCIL
Dale Beadle
Harry Wolf
Don Winters
David Gardner
Tom Marcetti
Ted Molesworth
CITY CLERK
Shirley Graves
CITY TREASURER
Carol Gorman
I

I

CITY ADMINISTRATOR
John Osborn

This document was adopted March 21, 1991 by the City of Yale Planning Commission as a master plan
pursuant to Act 285 of 1931, the Municipal Planning Act.

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
(

.

,

J

-~

(

r

Introduction

1

Regional Setting and Existing Land Use

2

Population

11

Natural Resources

23

Community Facilities and Services

31

Goals and Objectives

44

Thoroughfare Plan

54

Commercial and Industrial Areas Plan

70

Land Use Plan

79

Implementation Strategies and Opportunities

92

Appendix

98

�LIST OF FIGURES
,,.

Regional Location
Existing Land Use
Comparative Population Change
Residential Building Permits
Major Age Group Comparison
Employment by Sector
General Soil Map
Important Farmlands
Established County Drains
Woodlands
Wetlands
Water Distribution
Sanitary &amp; Stormwater System
Street Qassification Concept
Mobility &amp; Land Access Relationships
Existing Volumes
Existing Conditions
Thoroughfare Plan
Accident Rates for Road Sections with
Different Access Point Frequencies
Effect of Control of Access on
Accidents and Fatalities
Commercial and Industrial Impacts
Official Land Use Plan
Illustrative Land Use Plan for City of
Yale and Surrounding Area

• II
{
,,
(

,,
I

\

(

3
10
14
14
16
18
24
26
28
29
30
32
33-34
56
57
60
61
63
66
66
73
90
91

LIST OF TABLES
(

'',

!'

,
i
L

r

,

Population Comparison
Major Age Group Comparison
Labor Force and Employment
Employment by Sector
SEMCOG Population Projections
Detailed Population Projections
Yale Public Schools 1989-90 Census
Recreation Planning Standards
Standards for Special Facilities
Recommended Driveway Spacing Distances
Characteristics of Shopping Centers
City of Yale Annual Retail Expenditures
Employment Density by Category

13
17
17
19
19
20
36
38
39
66
81
82
84

�Introduction To The

(
t

CIIT OF YALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Yale is a policy document
developed by the Planning Commission to help guide long-range decision
making related to land use and development issues. The Comprehensive
Plan contains studies, charts, maps, text, and goals statements descnbing the
Commission's proposals. The Comprehensive Plan is not a Zoning
Ordinance and none of the maps are zoning maps. The Comprehensive Plan
does not change the zoning classification of individual properties. When
individual properties are proposed for rezoning, the goals, objectives, and
land use proposals of the Comprehensive Plan will guide the
recommendations of the Planning Commission and the legislative decisions
of the City Council.

(

It is also important to emphasize that the Comprehensive Plan is long range
in scope. Many of the recommendations will take years to accomplish.
Others may never be accomplished due to factors outside the control of the
City. For example, it is clear that federal and state assistance will be
necessary to fund some of the improvements, due to the City's limited
resources. If the City fails to get outside assistance, it may put some of the
projects in jeopardy. However, the City will continue to look to the
comprehensive plan for guidance in future decision making.
Public comments on the Comprehensive Plan are always welcome. They can
be addressed to the City of Yale Planning Commission, 111 W. Mechanic
Yale, MI 48097.

1
l

(·

•

�REGIONAL SETTING AND EXISTING LAND USE
There are many factors which combine to influence a community's future.
Some are the result of local decisions, while others result from actions
outside of the community. Likewise, the historical pattern of development
in the community forms a base from which decisions on future growth and
development will evolve. The purpose of this chapter is twofold. First, the
chapter is intended to provide a perspective of the City's regional position
and identify regional developments that may affect its future growth.
Second, the report and map identify the existing uses of land within City of
Yale as a base from which future land use patterns will be studied and
developed.

· Very few communities are so large and so diverse that they could exist and
thrive completely on their own. Rather, the interaction between communities
within the region gives each one the opportunity to grow and develop. The
two regional factors that help the individual community chart its own
possibilities are location and regional influences.
A BRIEF IDSTORY
1.

St. Clair County and the entire State of Michigan were once part of the
Northwest Territory, a large area west of the Appalachian Mountains, north
of the Ohio River, and east of the Mississippi River. In 1787, Congress
passed the Northwest Ordinance to set a land division system that would aid
settlers in defining the boundaries of newly settled land. The ordinance
established the partitioning of land by counties, townships, and sections on
a grid system.
The City of Yale and the surrounding area have been influenced by the grid
system. The provision of major roads on a one mile grid is one impact.
This grid system has also formed the basis, on a smaller scale, for the
pattern of local roads in the City.

REGIONAL LOCATION
City of Yale is located near the northwest border of St. Oair County,
surrounded on all sides by Brockway Township. The City is approximately
25 miles from Port Huron, 45 miles from Flint, and 60 miles from the City
of Detroit. Brockway Township is bordered by Speaker Township (Sanilac
County) to the north, Greenwood Township (St. Clair County) to the east,
Emmett Township (St. Clair County) to the south, and Lynn Township (St.
2

�r-I

••CM

. ~ . . TON

--,

_ _ r--,a.. lT

··-

oc1•,1ri..a

I

, . , ,,011t0
G(NlS((

s E E

GENE

I••·•T"'°"

I

L A p
(Mll(GUN

••C-IILO

........0,

I

CITY OF YALE

I

E E

••c•o.•

••• ,,u.o

lltOCIIWA'I'

A

., ,,,.

(LIA

llANC

T
CLYDI

C

••••o

N

HIU.tN

oa•ou,

L
ati..l•

..........

ATL.AI

......I R.·-•~...
C.CLUIIIUI

st
&amp;00

r--1

OAKL
•ou ,,.,,.r;,11L

co ....,

..,_fl&amp;.

.....

.,.

OC(OLA

NfGN •

...... o

IM.ltOT

LI

....

I

G•(UI OA11

LTl10

TIOT

'"""

STt••

I
t,.TON

OYI

_, ...

SD.ITN,lfLD

~- l.__-_11_•....

IIOliltWl[LD

otirr•

•rent•

I
S'fl¥Afi•

.....

:.-----i LIVONIA

...

r ~-,

\

...

ACOM ■

LtllG

••-eu•,

CL.Al•

·:....-L----l---+---t-1

HNO,l

c!

I

IIASNIIIGTCII

IOCNESTU
NIL.LS

'

PONTIAC:

1•JG,HON

·••10tt
~,

••wao.a

•c ....OMO

IM A C 0
OAILAN0

LA•( wAff.,D'tO ;

N

10sec

l=

.,.,T(

,so•

l'LT•OUTM

•••o•

, ... ,o ..

IC:10

,OEAR!I~'"""

...

,..,,,.
1NAlt0N

"U·
00•

0 ETROIT
. :J _..... .

--·

''(LO

1..00,

-:

HLOJt

C A

N

ill)

r

-1

1,-,....r•1·
1t1,.D

r

..

,

I

[:•000

r

B/A

BIRCHLER /ARROYO
ASSOCIATES

l[DfOIIO

REGIONAL LOCATION

�Clair County) to the west. Regional access is provided by North Street/Park
Avenue/Yale Road, an east-west County Primary Road and M-19, a northsouth State highway. M-19 provides convenient access to M-136, which leads
into the Port Huron area, and 1-69, which connects Yale with Port Huron
and Ontario, Canada to the east, and Flint and Lansing to the west.
FUTURE REGIONAL INFLUENCES

St. Oair County is in the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
(SEMC0G) region. SEMC0G plays an active role in providing planningrelated data, transportation modeling, and regional planning. SEMC0G also
reviews local applications for federal funding.
The St. Oair County Planning Commission also carries out planning
functions. The County recently approved a Solid Waste Plan, which is now
being implemented. The County Planning Commission also recently
completed a county-wide economic development plan used by the federal
Economic Development Administration to determine eligibility for EDA
project funding assistance. The Planning Commission is also involved in
transportation and recreation planning efforts. A new recreation plan should
be completed in 1991.
FUTURE LOCAL INFLUENCES
As noted above, the City of Yale shares common boundaries with Brockway

Township. The Township has a master plan and zoning ordinance in place.
The Master Plan, adopted in 1981, calls for rural, non-farm uses northwest
and northeast of the City of Yale. Southeast and southwest of the City,
agricultural uses are designated with the exception of the M-19 corridor,
which is commercial, and the railroad corridor, which is industrial.
EXISTING LAND USE

(

-t

(

In order to analyze growth and development in the community and provide
a reasonable base •from which to make current and long-range planning
recommendations, the existing use of land must be surveyed and evaluated.
In many cases, the existing land uses have already set a pattern in certain
parts of the community. In other areas, there may be vacant or underused
land that can be evaluated for its development or conservation value.

The information contained herein is based primarily on a parcel-by-parcel
survey of land use performed by the City's planning consultants in November
1989. The information was recorded on a base map of the City and checked
with aerial photographs. In addition, the downtown business district was
videotaped for future reference.
4

�LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS

I-

The following is a description of the various land use classifications used in
the survey.
Agriculture - This classification is applied to all land area used for crops and
permanent pasture land. In addition to these, however, this group also
includes such agricultural activities as horse breeding farms, greenhouses,
pick-your-own farms, and similar types of specialized activities.
Single-Family - This classification is for those areas containing single-family
dwelling units and accessory structures.
Two-Family -This classification is for areas containing two-family/duplex type
dwelling units and accessory structures.
Mobile Home - This category identifies planned mobile home parks and any
concentration of two or more individual mobile home units, including related
accessory buildings.
Multiple Family - Included in this group are all apartments and multi-plex
type of units where more than two separate residential units occupy a single
building on a lot.

!
r

Commercial and Office - Land areas where professional and business offices
are found. Retail sales and service businesses are placed in the
commercial/office category.
Industrial - This category includes uses with or without buildings where
materials are processed, fabricated, assembled, or manufactured, or where
equipment, materials, or wastes are stored out-of-doors.
Natural Resources Extraction - This category includes topsoil, sand, gravel,
peat, or other types of soil removal operations.
Public - Land area and facilities such as schools, City libraries, and
government buildings are considered public uses.
Quasi Public - Included within this classification are such uses as churches,
private elementary schools, hospitals, private cemeteries, and the like.
Recreation - Included are public and private parks, golf courses, etc.
Utility Uses - This group includes such uses as telephone, gas or electric
stations and substations, high voltage transmission lines, water pumping

s

�stations, communications towers and similar uses operated by municipal
departments or public utility companies.

,.f

Vacant or FaJlow - This category includes all remaining land that is presently
unused, idle, or agricultural land laying fallow. Woodlands and wetlands,
which are included in this category, are separately identified in the Natural
Resources chapter of this document.

LAND USE ANALYSIS

I

' .

This report will be a slight departure from the "typical" planning analysis that
seeks to measure the amount of acreage involved in each of the land use
categories. While that approach is highly desirable in a community with very
little vacant land or one with a large amount of redevelopment needed, it
does not appear to be a useful tool in planning for the City of Yale's future
at this time. The land use analysis will concentrate instead on the
generalized "pattern" of existing uses.
AGRICULTURE

As can be seen from the Existing Land Use Map, agriculture is one of the
predominant surface uses of the land near the outer fringe of the City of
Yale. It has become common for many farmers or farm land owners in the
Midwest to obtain other employment outside the rural area while maintaining
their own farms as a side or part-time business.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

The City's residential development is primarily characterized by a
concentrated core near the City center. This area has developed primarily
along a grid street system, with roads intersecting at 90 degrees. Due to the
smaller lot sizes, many residents are within walking distance of the downtown
retail businesses.

I .

Several apartment complexes are located within the City limits. The Yale
apartments are located along North Street, near the Yale Community
Hospital. The Walnut Village senior apartments are located in the northwest
quadrant of the City. Medi-lodge, an extended care nursing facility, is
located across from Yale Community Hospital.

I

r

There are two mobile home parks in the City: one on North Main (North
Hill Mobile Home Village) and another off of North Street, north of the
Medi-lodge complex.

6

r

�'

"' I

I

- I

Llke most communities, a small percentage of the City's housing shows signs
of deterioration and neglect. Most units in this category are victims of long
overdue maintenance. Only a handful were abandoned or in such disrepair
that they threaten the comfort and safety of the occupants. The vast
majority of the City's housing is characterized by well-maintained, attractive
homes and neighborhoods.
COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE

The City of Yale has a strong retail core of businesses and service-oriented
offices that serves the entire region, not just City residents. The City of Yale
serves the surrounding ruraVagricultural communities in much the same way
that the combination of neighborhood and community shopping centers
serves the urban and suburban areas. Not only are daily needs like food,
medicine, doctors and dentists, hair stylists, and gasoline stations available,
but also comparison shopping for major durable goods, such as furniture,
appliances, and automobiles. Yale's business community is truly a "full
service" shopping area. The following is a list of most of the services and
retail goods offered within the downtown core:

t

I
'

'-

[

!

-,

I

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Bowling
Pizza restaurant
Feed store
Hardware
Medical
Automobile dealer
Party store
Gas station
Fabric store
Bank
Furniture
Hair styling
Tavern
Discount goods
Laundry
Pharmacy
Flowers

(

I
7

Cards and Gifts
Auto Parts
Newspaper
Insurance
Gun shop
Department store
Appliances
Resale shop
Bakery
Chiropractor
Optometrist
Realtor
Video store
Post office
Dentist
Funeral home

�INDUSTRIAL

Industrial development is found along the railroad right-of-way through the
City core. Included with the industrial users are agri-business users such as
a grain elevator operation. In some locations, the industrial uses abut
residential uses, with little or no buffer or screening. This residentialindustrial interface will be discussed in more detail later in the Commercial
and Industrial Plan.
PUBLIC AND QUASI PUBLIC

Public and quasi public uses are scattered throughout the City. Included are
several churches, the Yale City Hall/DPW complex on West Mechanic, the
new hbrary on Jones Street, the Yale Junior High School, the elementary
and high schools off of Park Avenue, the Yale Community Hospital, the
senior center, the United States Post Office, and the American Legion, Lions
Oub, and VFW halls.
UTILl1Y USES

Utility uses are also scattered through out the City. Included is an electric
substation on Kennific at Will Street, a gas regulator station at Morrell and
Oarence Streets, and a sewage treatment facility in the southeast quadrant
of town.
RECREATION

The primary recreation facility in the City is the Yale City Park and
Memorial Field located on Park Avenue. The park includes a ballfield with
bleachers and scorekeepers' tower, picnic pavilion and tables, grills, swings,
slides, climbers, restrooms, lighted horseshoe pits (4), shuffleboard (2),
walking· areas, river, and parallel parking for 60-80 cars.
Recreation facilities are also provided at the high schooVelementary school
complex, including 5 tennis courts, 2 basketball courts, Heritage School mini
museum, swings, slides, climbers, picnic tables, footbalVsoccer field, and 5
baseball diamonds.
Additionally, the Trinity Missionary Church has a ballfield.
I

I

t

8
r

�CONCLUSION

-.

\

The development patterns identified on the Existing Land Use map provide
a base from which to begin the process of developing a City Master Plan.
By correlating existing development and natural features with the expected
future population, the Planning Commission can begin to develop a plan for
the community's long range development. This particular approach to the
planning process insures a plan for future land use that is sensitive to the
City's historical pattern of development, the natural capabilities of the City's
physical resources, as well as the social needs of the existing and future
population.

..

I -,

9

�e

••
••
0
0

'

•

SINGLE &amp; TWO-FAMILY
MOBILE HOME PARK
MULTIPLE FAMILY
COMMERCIAL &amp; OFFICE
INDUSTRIAL
UTILITIES
PUBLIC &amp; QUASI

PUBLIC

RECREATION
AGRICULTURE
VACANT

I

.

EXISTING LAND USE: 1989

• .J

IIIL
CITY OF YALE Pl. -\\"\li\C (.'0'.\1'11SSIO'\
ST. CL\IR corNn ·. \11 ('111(;,.\'\

Ill I

:c

B/A

BIRCHLER / ARROYO
ASSOCIATES

�POPULATION

One of the basic ingredients in planning for the future is to study the
population of a community, i.e., its composition and characteristics.
Historical and current population trends can be used in various ways to
illustrate problem areas and forecast probable future needs. Proper planning
of future land uses and roads must take the existing allocations of
population, and particularly future projections, into consideration.
This chapter will examine three primary aspects of the City's population: past
historical trends, present composition, and future population levels based on
current trends, correlated with the effects of certain future variables. By
analyzing the potential for population growth or decline, the City hopes to
anticipate the needs of the community. Proper land development can result
only after the appropriate allocation of future population within the social
and physical requirements of the City.
PAST AND PRESENT POPULATION TRENDS

From the tum of the century to 1980, the United States' population nearly
tripled, growing from 75,995,000 to 226,504,825. During the same period, the
East North Central States (Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana and Ohio)
grew at a slightly slower rate, with their population increasing from
16,000,000 persons in 1900 to 41,669,738 by 1980. As a percent of the
United States, the East North Central States, decreased by 2.6 percent
between 1900 and 1980, dropping from 21.0 to 18.4 percent.
Michigan, as a percent of the East North Central States, has increased its
share of the East North Central States' population from 15.2 percent in 1900
to 22.2 percent in 1980. This means that Michigan claims between one-fifth
and one-fourth of the population of the five state area.
Broadly speaking, the evolution or growth of the United States can be
described in terms of three basic eras:
1.
2.
3.

The Agricultural Era - which ended in the late 1800's
The Manufacturing Era - which prevailed through the late
1950's.
The Human Resources Era - which emerged during the early
1960's.

The Agricultural Era relied upon individual strength and manpower. The
basic production system was one of self-reliance. Families tended to be very
11

�large and farm size was somewhat dependent upon how much land the
family could till. Areas of urbanization were limited to small cities and
villages that provided market places and social and cultural activities for the
families in the surrounding farmland.
(

The Manufacturing Era or age of industrialization took people from the farm
to jobs in the cities and growing urban centers. One of the most important
developments of this era was the beginning of the urbanization movement
and improvements in the region's road network. With these improvements
it became possible for persons to live in the outlying rural areas while
commuting to work in cities like Detroit, Port Huron, and Flint.
Contrasted with the Agricultural and Manufacturing Eras, when most work
required physical strength or dexterity, is the Human Resources Era, when
an increasing percentage of workers needed higher levels of educational
achievement and mental development to meet job requirements. The
demand for education, greater specialization, and the technology of
automation and computers is usually evidenced in the growth patterns of a
region. The rapid increase in the use of robots and computer control of
many manufacturing processes is causing a rise in the demand for specialized
university level training. Many job areas that were formally thought of as
exclusively manual tasks now require skilled training. Greater reliance on
and use of machines in the manufacturing processes has also resulted in a
drop in highly-paid, skilled manufacturing jobs. The slack is being taken up
by increases in the service sector. Service sector jobs typically earn lower
wages, however, forcing many families to resort to two wage earners in order
to maintain their standard of living. Many experts point to western Europe
as an example of the standard of living toward which the United States is
gradually moving.

\

..-

'

i '

I-

In the past few decades, the trend bas been to subdivide farmland for
residences and mini-farms. Many farmers have abandoned farming for better
salaries in industry. This is evidenced by the number of part-time farmers
and the traffic increases on the major north/south arteries. In addition,
people were fleeing the urban centers like the City of Detroit to live in the
more open and rural areas, while they continue to work in the urban areas.
This movement was so pronounced nationally that it even prompted the
coining of a new word to describe these rural area suburbs: Ruburbia.
Ruburbia is also referred to as exurban, meaning outside the urban core.

The decade from 1970 to 1980 saw a basic change in the migration of the
population of the United States. For the previous four decades more people
left the rural areas for the metropolitan centers. This trend suddenly
12

�..
'

I .

reversed itself, however, and the country experienced a general move from
the central cities to the rural countryside. Continued transportation
improvements and a decade of "back to the land" sentiments appear to have
combined to spur this phenomena. The early 1990's shows continuing growth
in many of these !'non-metropolitan" or urban fringe counties.

\

IDSTORICAL GROWfH

The table below shows a comparison of population change from 1970 to
1990 for City of Yale and several other townships in northern St. Clair
County. The City of Yale's growth is illustrated in the accompanying figure.
Of the St. Clair County municipalities listed, the City of Yale had a higher
percentage increase than the County average, but lower than most other area
municipalities during the 1970's and higher than others during the 1980's.
Based on U.S Census of Population data, growth in the City of Yale took
place at a rate of two percent per year during the 1970's.
Based on
1990 Census data, the yearly growth was 0.9 percent during the 1980-1990
period.
1970-1990 POPUIATION COMPARISON
SELECTED ST. CLAIR COUNTY COMMUNITIES

Community
YALE
Brockway Twp.
Emmett Twp.
Lynn Twp.
Greenw'd Twp

_f

SL Clair
County

1970
Population

1980
Population

1970-80 %
Change

Population

ND-~
Change
+
+
-

1990

1,505
998
1,297
767
889

1,814
1,586
1,698
999
1,046

+20.5
+58.9
+30.9
+30.2
+17.7

1,977
1,569
1,796
908
1,030

120,175

138,802

+15.5

144,753

9.0
1.1
5.8
9.1
1.5

+ 4.3

r

Source: U.S. Census of Population

L

Building permits and household size are two important indicators of changes
in population. A decrease in household size can cause a community's
population to actually decline even though the number of homes increases.

I

I'

[
'-.

,-·

13

�COMPARATIVE POPULATION CHANGE
City of Yale 1960-1987
3000

2500

(.

1887

2000

1500

1000

500

0
1960

1970

1980

1987

Year

'\
1987 Estimate From SEMCOG

RESIDENTIAL BLDG. PERMITS
City of Yale 1980-89
Number of Permits

30

r-------------------------,
24

25
20
15
10

5
0

1980

,-

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

Year

l.
Source: SEMCOG

•

Res . Units Permitted

-

Demolition Permits

1989

�A large increase in residential building permits can also be reflective of a
coming increase in population. The figure on the previous page shows
building permit activity in City of Yale during the 1980's. As the figure
shows, building permits were relatively flat, with the exception of multi-family
units in 1980 and 1984.

r

i

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS

National birth rates were relatively high and increasing after World War II
until 1967, which resulted in a substantial increase in the school age groups.
The past fifteen years, however, have witnessed a decline both in birth rates
and numbers of school age children. The only exception has been in the
senior high school population which is still feeling the effects of the earlier
baby boom. As a percent of total population, the age group 65 and over has
seen a marked increase, due in large part to advances in the medical
sciences over the past 30 years.
The high rate of decline in the number of children under 5 years of age
coupled with the increased number of women between 15 and 49 resulted
in a sharp drop in the fertility rate to 2.3 in 1970. The U.S. Bureau of the
Census contends that if the fertility rate drops to 2.1 there will be only
271,000,000 persons in the United States by the year 2000, and in 70 years
the nation will reach zero population growth. Current trends show, however,
that while zero population growth has occurred for short periods, there is
currently a resurgence of persons in their 30's who are having children. This
represents the group of the post World War II baby boom, who have started
families of their own.
I

•

r

FAMILY SIZE
The 1980 Census of Population showed an average household size in City of
Yale of 2.62 persons per unit (ppu), which is slightly lower than 2.92 ppu
figure for St. Clair County. The national trend toward smaller household
sizes will likely be· reflected in future Yale ppu figures, particularly if
additional senior housing is constructed. In fact, a 1990 SEMCOG estimate
shows a 1990 ppu rate of 2.41. If young families become attracted to the
area, the household size could increase in the future, contrary to the national
trend.

15

L

�AGE GROUPINGS

Age groupings generally define several social categories. The preschool
group includes those under five years of age. Those from age 5-13 make up
the elementary/middle school age group, while the hlgh school sector includes
those between 14 and 17 years. The bulk of the work force is found between
age 18 and 64, with the 21-44 group representing family formation years and
45 to 64 representing mature families.
The table on the next page and the accompanying figure below show the
breakdown of the City's population by age in comparison with St. Oair
County. The table shows the City's population generally mirrors the County
average for the younger age groups. However, the senior population is much
hlgher in the City of Yale than the County average.

Major Age Group Con1parison
City of Yale vs. St. Clair County

65+ Years
65+ Years

21.7%

18-64 Years

47 .8%

10 .7%

18-64 Years

57 .4%

14-17 Years 8.4%
5-13Years 15.8%
&gt; 5 Years 7 .7%

14-17 Years 6 .8%
5-13 Years 15.9%
&gt; 5 Years 7 .8%

City of Yale

St. Clair County

Source : U.S. Census of Population

16

�Major Age Group Comparison - 1980
City of Yale vs. St. Clair County

St. Oair County
Percent

City of Yale
Percent

I .
(

7.8

7.7

15.9

15.8

6.8

8.4

Workforce (18-64)

47.8

57.5

Retirement (65 +)

21.7

10.7

100.0

100.0

Preschool (0-4)
Elementary/Middle (5-13)
High School (14-17)

TOTAL

Source: U.S. Census of Population

EMPLOYMENT
The table below shows the changes in the civilian labor force (persons
employed plus persons classified as unemployed) and employment for City
of Yale. The Michigan Employment Security Commission rounds the data
to the nearest 25. In November 1989, the unemployment rate in City of
Yale was 8.8 percent, compared with 7.1 percent for St. Qair County.

Labor Force and Employment

Month

Labor Force Employed

Unemployed

Percent
Unemployed

November 1985

675

600

75

12.5

November 1987

700

625

75

10.7

November 1989

725

650

75

8.8

r

.I
Source: Michigan Employment Security Commission

f

r -

17

�Based on the above table, approximately 33 percent of the total population
of City of Yale is currently employed. The number of people employed
should continue to increase as the population increases, barring any
economic disasters.
The table on the next page and the accompanying figure below show
employment by sector in City of Yale from the 1980 Census of Population.
The data shows that a majority of those employed are not in the farming
industry, even though one of the predominant land use categories is
agriculture. Forty-five percent of those employed in 1980 were skilled
laborers, fabricators or unskilled laborers. Less than one percent were in the
farming industry. As a comparison, St. Oair County had two percent
employed in the farming industries and 41 percent employed as skilled
laborer, fabricators or unskilled laborers.

EMPLOYMENT BY SECTOR
City of Yale: 1980

Operators/ Laborers
30 .0%

Managers and Profes .
19.0%

Skilled Workers

Tech .. Sales. Admin .

15.0%

19 .0%

Service Occupation
17.0%
r -

I

Source : U.S. Census of Population

r
l.

18

�Employment by Sector - 1980

St Oair Comity
Percentage

City of Yale
Percentage

Sector
Managers and Professionals

19

18

Technicians, Sales &amp; Adm. Support

19

25

Service Occupation

17

14

•

2

Skilled workers

15

17

Operators and Laborers

30

24

Farming/Forestry

• Less than 0.1 percent

Large geographic areas generally have a significant influence on their smaller
constituent sub-areas. The growth rate for City of Yale is directly influenced
by the growth of the larger geographic areas of which it is a part. For this
reason, the St. Oair County area is discussed in conjunction with the City's
future population estimate.
The most recently available population forecasts for St. Oair County and
City of Yale are those developed by the SEMCOG. Results are as follows:

SEMCOG Population Projections
1990

I

t
f -

l

'

Area

1990
Forecast

City of Yale

1,830

1,859

1,908

146,322

162,950

174,249

St. Clair County

2000
Forecast

r

\

L-.
r

19

2010
Fcreaist

�A more detailed table for City of Yale is shown in below. The 1990
projections were recently released by SEMCOG. The overall low growth
rate forecast by SEMCOG is reflective of the trends established in the
1980's.

Detailed Population Projections
City of Yale

Population

Household
Size

Occupied
Housing Units

1980 (census)

1,814

2.75

659

1990

1,830

2.41

724

1995

1,843

2.33

752

2000

1,859

2.26

785

2005

1,887

2.21

816

2010

1,908

2.15

848

Year

Source: SEMCOG

Any number of mathematical methods can be used to project the City's
future population. Three methods that seem particularly reasonable and
which lend themselves to the available data include the constant proportion,
growth rate, and increasing proportion methods. All of these methods are
based on historical trends.

J
!

The constant proportion method assumes that the City will maintain the
same percentage of the county's projected 1990 and 2000 population as it
experienced in 1980. City of Yale contained 1.3 percent of the County's
1980 population. Projections for the City using this method are as follows:

r
St. Clair County
r

I

City of Yale

1980
Population

1990
Projection

2000
Projection

138,802

146,322

162,950

1,8~4

1,902

2,118

20
I .

�This methodology is close to target for growth during the 1980's. The
constant proportion method yields a 0.1 percent per year increase from 1990
to 2000, which is probably too low.
The growth rate method is an alternative method of projection that assumes
the 1980-1990 growth rate will be the same as between 1970-1980, and the
1980-2000 growth rate will be the same as between 1960 and 1980. The
results are as follows:

City of Yale 1980 Population
1970-1980 Percent Change
City of Yale 1990 Projection
1960-1980 Percent Change
City of Yale 2,000 Projection

1,814
20.5%
2,185
11.9%
2,029

Growth rates during the 1970's were much higher than the 1980's, according
to SEMCOG estimates. The 20-year projection is probably too low because
the decline in population from 1960 to 1970, which lowered the overall 20year rate, is not likely to be repeated.
The increasing proportion method assumes that the historical change favoring
rural over urban areas will continue over the next two decades. If the larger
incorporated areas stabilize and the rural townships and small cities increase
their share of the county, it seems reasonable to expect the City of Yale's
share of the County to rise from 1.3 percent in 1980 to 1.4 percent in 1990,
1.5 percent in 2000 and 1.6 percent in 2010. The results are as follows:

St. Oair County Forecast
Increasing Proportion %
City of Yale Projection

1990
146,322
1.4%
2,048

2000
162,950
1.5%
2,444

2010
174,249
1.6%
2,787

This method slightly overestimates growth in the 1980's, and it likely
overestimates 2000 and 2010 population levels.

I

II
\...

21

�For planning purposes it is important to plan for the future population of the
City using accurate projections. It is better to be on the ''high side" so
adequate facilities match the future population. During the City's formation
of this Master Plan, the following target population levels will be used:
1990
2000
2010

1,900
2,200
2,500

•

,.

I

I

(

I

I

L....

r
,

1

l. .
r·

'

/.

22

�NATURAL RESOURCES

\.

TOPOGRAPHY

,_

The land surface of the City of Yale is relatively flat, with the highest
elevations of approximately 830 feet N.G.V.D (National Geodetic Vertical
Datum) in the eastern and extreme northern portions of the City. The low
elevation of approximately 775 feet N.G.V.D occurs along Mill Creek.
Except for the steep banks of the creek, which are flood prone anyway,
topography does not pose a major problem for land development in and
around Yale.

GEOLOGY
The City of Yale lies within an area that was likely covered by an ancient
glacial lake as the last ice age came to a close. As a result, the topography
is primarily that of a level plain which was formed by sediments settling to
the bottom of the ancient lake.
Lacustrine clay and silt, which is a predominant near-surface geological
feature along the M-19 corridor, is characterized by gray to dark reddish
brown colors, and chiefly occurs as flat, low-lying areas formerly inundated
by glacial Great Lakes.
A small area of laustrine sand and gravel is also found along Mill Creek in
the southwest portion of the City. This feature, which occurs primarily as
beach and nearshore littoral deposits of former glacial Great Lakes, contains
pale brown to pale reddish brown color, fine to medium sand, and
metamorphic rocks.
The City is also traversed by a water-laid moraine - an accumulation of earth
and stones left by a glacier. This moraine, which occurs roughly in the
eastern 1/4 and western 1/4 of the City, is an end moraine of fine-textured
till. It is comprised of gray, grayish brown, or reddish brown, non-sorted
glacial debris running in narrow linear belts of hummocky relief marking
former stillstands of ice-sheet margin.
SOILS

f

r

There area twelve major soil associations found in St. Qair County. These
soil associations are areas with a distinctive or proportional patterns of soils.
The General Soils Map shows the locations throughout the City of Yale and

'

,
I

L

23

�r

SOIL ASSOCIATIONS
Blount-Parkh i ll association : Nearly level to gently sloping, some-

what poorly dra ined and poorly drained soi Is that hove a doml•
nantly loamy subsoil; an till plains
Londo-Avoca ossoc:iotion : Nearly level to gently sloping, somewhat

poorly droined , dominantly high-lime soils that hove a loamy to
sandy subsoil; on till plains cind mMoines
Pert-Sims association : Nearly level to gently sloping, somewhat

poorly drained ond poorly drained, dominantly high-lime soils that
have o clayey to loamy subsoil; on till pla ins and moraines

r

Hoytvllle-Allendale-Napponee association: Nearly level to gently
sloping, very poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained aolla
that hove a clayey to sandy subsoil; on till plains and moraine•

-I

\

Allendale-Lotty ossoc:lorlon: Nearly level to gently sloping,
somewhat pgorly drained and very poorly dra ined soils that hove
o sandy to clayey subsoil; on the lake pla i n

U. $ . DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE

MICHIGAN AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

GENERAL SOIL MAP
ST. CLAIR COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Pouldlng••.Wosepl, cloy subsoil vor lont, association ; Nearly level,

very poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained sol ls that hove
a clayey to loamy subsoil; on the lake ploln and glacial loke

beaches

Latty ouoclation : Nearly level, very poorly drained •oils
hove a clayey subootl; an the lake pla In

iijsj

f

rho,

I

0
r

I

1
I

2

3

4 Miles

I

I

I

Wainolo-Deford assoclotlan : Nearly level, oomewhot poa,ly
drained and very poorly drained soi ls that hove a sandy sub•
so il; an glacial toke beaches, outwash plains, ond deltas
Eostpon-Wainola-Tobico o .. oclotlan : Nearly level ta 1trongly

, ......... fe,- . . . .,.,

sloping, well-drained, somewho! poorly drolned, and very. poorly
drained soils that have ·o sandy subsoil; on gloclol lake beaches

,-Hirie,et . . .u ,.,

Boyer•Wosepl-Spinks association : Nearly level to gently sloping,
well-drained and somewhat poorly drained , dominantly sandy so i ls
thar hove o sandy to loomy subsoil; in gloc:lol droinageways and

on gloc ial lake beaches and outwosh plains

r

1

Boch ossoclotlon : Nearly level, very poorly drained, domlnontly
high-lime soils tho, hove a laomy subsoll; In gloclo l drainageways and on the lake plaln

Alluvial lond-Rough broken lond ossoclorlon : Nearly level to
gently sloping , -It-drained to poorly dra ined soi lo on flood
plains and the odlacen, steep to very steep sol ls on bluffs

Compoled 1971

i,le1t11tiA9.

,, . . .

...1, ._..;., ..u, ertd ..,., _, n1ttetft

~,....... , ,.,.,...;,.,.

�the surrounding area. The map shows that two of the twelve associations
occur in the City.
The drainage of most soils in the City is relatively poor due to the level
topography.
The predominant soil association, Blount-Parkhill, is
characterized by a surface layer of dark grayish loam that is nine inches
thick. Surface runoff is generally slow, available water capacity is high, and
wetness limits many non-farm uses. The other soil association, Alluvial land
- Rough broken land, is found along Mill Creek, and it is found along flood
plains.
SOIL SUITABILI1Y FOR AGRICULTURE

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has classified most of the open area
outside the City of Yale urban core as prime farmland on the Important
Farmlands Map. The major exception is the narrow Mill Creek corridor and
a large area southwest of the City core.
Although designated as prime farmland, wetness can limit the cultivation of
crops. In addition, the eventual expansion of the urban area of the City will
likely remove this available farm land from active use. There are, however,
approaches to retaining agriculture and open space while permitting
urban development that can be implement through the zoning ordinance.
CAPABILITIES FOR WILDLIFE AND RECREATION

The Mill Creek area is a prime wildlife and recreation habitat. The steep
slopes and soil conditions are generally not suitable for agriculture or the
development of structures. In addition, the area is flood prone due to its
proximity to the creek. However, the heavily wooded area is excellent as a
wildlife habitat and place for passive recreational activities such as
birdwatching. The City park has taken advantage of this resource.
The open, non-forested areas of the City are also home to many wildlife
species that thrive in an open environment, such as wild game species.
These open areas are often overlooked as valuable wildlife areas.
LIMITATIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

r
l

l. -

l.

The poor surface drainage that generally prevails throughout the rural
portions of the City and the surrounding Township presents problems for the
construction of homes and other structures, although such problems can be
alleviated by good site selection and improving surface drainage through

25

�JEDDO ROAD

~
0

a:

zIll

Cl

a:
0
,..,

I

SPEAKER

'·

IMPORTANT FARMLANDS

□

IMPORTANT FARMLANDS

URBAN AREA

l

OTHER LAND
CI1Y OF YALE PLANNING COMMISSION

B/A

BIRCHLER / ARROYO
ASSOCIATES

Source: USDA, Soil Conservation Service

�ditching and other measures. The extension of City sewer service to these
outlying areas also assists in overcoming soil limitations for septic tanks.
SURFACE WATER AND DRAINAGE

Mill Creek is the only large stream flowing through the City.

The
Established County Drains Map shows the locations of County drains and
natural watercourses in the City and Brockway Township.
WOODLANDS AND VEGFfATION

Most of the major wooded areas that once covered the City of Yale have
been removed either for the lumber value or to expand agricultural uses.
However, there are still several areas of large woodlots, especially along
portions of Mill Creek. Not only do wooded areas add a great deal to the
natural beauty of the City, but they provide wildlife habitat, serve as
windbreaks, replenish oxygen, and aid in the absorption of rainwater. The
Woodlands Map shows the location of wooded areas in Yale and Brockway
Township, as identified by the Michigan Resource Inventory System (MIR.IS)
of the MDNR. It should be noted, however, that additional woodlands are
found along Mill Creek within the City of Yale, but they are not shown on
the map.
Some vacant farmland also exists, and much of this has reverted to grassland
and brush. As mentioned above, although these areas are not economically
productive, they area of great value to many types of wildlife, including
upland game birds.
WETLANDS

rl .
-l

The Wetlands map on the following page shows the wetland areas within the
City of Yale and Brockway Township. These areas were identified by the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources using the Michigan Resource
Inventory System (MIRIS).
GROUNDWATER RESOURCES

l.

The City of Yale relies entirely upon groundwater for its water supply, with
the vast majority of all residences being served by municipal wells. It
appears that this situation will continue for the foreseeable future, so the
availability of groundwater is an important factor in planning for the
community's future. Because it is supplied primarily as a City service, water
is discussed in more detail below in the Community Facilities and Services
portion of this chapter.
27

r

I

�BROCKWA r TOWNSHIP r.•-.11.1•c. sr.

....,.,,,.1..-

CLAIR

coUNTY.

£STABLISH£D

MtcH.

COUNTY

DRAINS

,.,,

...1-.."~
Cl,;

~
'r,

,.,

~

~
(_:

,,-...

...

,.,

~

;..
'"..J
l..J

-

~
~

:-.

,..

....J

lC:
','I

!
!

'"

0/fAIN.S

ft'ArCRCOU/fSES

- - · ·· - - · · -

__,

-··
,_·_•_:._·_-_·_••.•.••.•-%------------

.,,.,

.,___D_,,_•_'_N_s__'_o_"_"_c_,_r__r_o__

BROCKWAY

TOWNSHIP

�·-·-·-·
~~

•

I

WOODLANDS

7,

•

~

6

r•

~

2

~

-

~

~

1/,

0

•

1///.

I

~z

d,

,//-w.

•

I
•
I

7

q

~

1/.

~
0

~

12
LEGEND
~

I•

-·rs-·-·

V

m

~

I
•

•

~
1~

City of Yale
Planning Commission

I
•
I

~

•

~

~///

•

-'
18

CITY OF YALE &amp;
BROCKWAY TOWNSHIP

~
~

·--~

1

~

?" •
I
I

13

•

20

~

/

~

23

/

SOURCE

30 -

28

~,
t'-31 ~w¼

I

1//,

~

l ~

1/

•

~

#A

~~

~~--.

$

•

~

I

- 'I

1. MICH1GAN DEPARTMENT Cf' NATURAL RESOURCES
la240lil0 COLOR IN=RARED AERIAL
PHOTOGRAPHY,1q79
2. SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COUNCIL Cf'
GOVERNMENTS la24elillil BLACK ANO WHITE
AER1AL PHOTOGRAPHY,1q95

•

I
•
I
•
I

TREE (42q)

NUMBERS FOLLOWING LEGEND DESCRIPTION
INDICATE RESOURCES INVENTORY CLASSIFICATION
CODES

.

ft

UPLAND CONIFER (421,422)

•

~
~
19

ASPEN, BIRCH (413&gt;

Ill CHRISTMAS

~

22

UPLAND HARDWOODS (411,412)

•

l'l

I
•
I
•
I

THIS MAP WAS COMPILED FROM AERIAL
PHOTOGRAPHS USING STANDARD MANUAL
INTERPRETATION TECHNIOLES. Tt£ INFORMATION
HAS NOT BEEN FIELD CHECKED. THIS MAP IS
INTENDED FOR GENERAL PLANNING PURPOSES.
SITE SPECIFIC EVALUATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED
BY FIELD INSPECTION.

DN:.

DD'NmelT CF N I I ~ IIESO.K:ES

,.~
W/~

~

%~
½

34

T8N,R14E
,_

~

36

I
•
I
•
I
•
I

(iifijf@
IIEStUQ: IM'DIMIIT11»4 S'ISlD4
UlfCl #CJ IMT'EJI _ , . DIYISIOI

1112-1111-eq

0

~00

8000

FEET

120a1

�·-·-·-·
..,;

~ ~

~W/~~
~ ~ ~
1

6

•

¼

~

2

•/~

,'

~~

I

~~~~
~~
w. ~
~
~

~

•

WETLANDS

~

CI1Y OF YALE &amp;

~

BROCKWAY TOWNSHIP

0

•

~

J

~✓-

~
I

~

w.~

~

~

I
•
I
I

•

.. 18
•

w

t/

~
~

,~

~~
~
%.

1/,4

,

12

LEGEND
~

~~

~

",

,:.

~
~
•

g.t

~

~

••
~

22

~

23

1. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT CF NATURAL RES~CES
1&amp;24'!00 Cll..OR INFRARED AERIAL
PHOTOGRAPHY.1q79
2. SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COUNCIL CF
GOVERNMENTS 1&amp;24'!00 BLACK ANO WHITE
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY. 1q95

~

~

/j
~

Ill LOWLAND CONIFER (423)

SOURCE

,,,~

l

~ LOWLAND HAROWOOO 1414.611)

4

--~ m

~;

"'l'

I
I
•
I
I

. 'I
-'

I

THIS MAP WAS COMPILED FROM AERIAL
PHOTOGRAPHS USING STANDARD MANUAL
INTERPRETATION TECHNIQUES. THE *ORMATION
HAS NOT BEEN FIELD CHECKED. THIS MAP IS
INTENDED FOR GENERAL PLANNING PlllPOSES.
SITE SPECIFIC EVALUATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED
BY FIELD INSPECTION.

DNR~

1

I

SHRUB, EMERGENT, AQUATIC BED
(612, 621,622.623)

NUMBERS FOLLOWING LEGENO DESCRIPTION
INDICATE RESOURCES INVENTORY CLASSIFICATION
CODES

-~

~

I
I

13

$/

21

~ OPEN WATER 151.52,531 l
-

~

-·J''&gt;'r"

~

.

•

I•

~

~

I

•

•

16

~
w.

·-·~11•

t"g,-4~

7

City of Yale
Planning Commission

~
ff'

I

r•

•

I

~

·

1//,

32

~ ')
~
~

34

P-~

~
0

~

~

~I

~•
35

36

I
I
I
I

OEP_,_ CIF - ~ AESCLIICES

~

MIOCIGOfO l!£SQ.RZ H'OIMIITIOH SYSTEM
LNC&gt; NC&gt; WATIII _ _ , ~

02- 111-eq

0

~1110

8000

FEET

12000

�COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Community facilities include both facilities and programs offered by the City
to its residents and business people. Many of these facilities are essential to
maintaining an adequate standard of living, yet are often taken for granted.
They are also a key factor in determining how much a City can grow. For
example, without public water and sewer service, it is often difficult to
achieve the desired level of development.
The ability to attract new businesses and residents is also directly related to
the provision of community facilities and services. More and more, business
leaders are evaluating the "quality of life" in a community before locating or
relocating a business into a new area. Without quality recreation facilities,
sewer and water capacity, and cultural amenities, a community can be passed
by, even though land and labor costs are reasonable.
WATER AND SEWER

The maps on the following pages show the existing water and sewer system.
The map shows how the provision of water and sewer influences
development patterns. Those areas with municipal water and sewer
experience urban type development levels.
Water is provided by several municipal wells, although typically only one well
is needed to meet demand. Current average water demand is estimated at
200,000 gallons per day.
Sewage treatment is provided by two treatment lagoons in the southeast
portion of the City. These lagoons are approaching capacity, and the City
has prepared plans to add a third lagoon. The plans are currently being
reviewed by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
Based on the above, water supply does not appear to be a constraint to
additional development in the City. The only limitation is the cost of
extending distribution lines to underdeveloped portions in the City. Sewer
treatment is a limitation to growth from both a capacity and distribution
standpoint. The City has, however, taken actions toward expanding capacity
in the future via a third lagoon.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DPW)

The DPW provides a wide variety of city services including maintenance of
the water and sewer systems, street maintenance, snow removal, and street

31

�MAP

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
OF YALE

CITY
MASTER

SEWER B WATER

B

INVENTORY

EVALUATION

FOR

CITY OF YALE

S

ST. CLAIR COUNTY

METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION

z.,·

400
1· •

600

, IZ

800

zoo·

~
q

-I

, :4

r
,,,. ,,..
-

0

ffS

S,,

f'I

4,(/

-

••

.,

•

...

J □-:

..... -... .,, .-....,,. ,, ,,._~£...._,,.~.,,~ ...,- ,-,,,• -.,,.

JN~-,.._..,dv

r..-_-,....

_

I......

"'Yr ,h"., •• •~ .·

~,.,•.~T.;'1,/1/'f

, j-·,
.. h·
-r.· ,..,,,,_,
•
Pw01fltf't11S10NSDATC

-

•• .: - •... ,•,..-.

,- · • •

WATER DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM MAP
CIT1'

CF YALE

ST CLAIR COUNTY, MICHIGAN

·--···"-·.-... --···-

IDIDf •rt[OD AU JDIIMSOlt " '
roH'-t.11 IIHC I 110t,1Hl I ~ a 1 ""'0 M,.,vl W()M\

�SAN ITARY S STORM SEWER INVENTORY
OF YAL E

CIT Y
MASTER

SEWER

WATER

INVENTORY

B EVALUATION

FOR

CITY OF YALE

8

ST. CLAIR COUNTY

METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION

4~ 0 0

8 00

STORM SE WER
SANITARY SE WER
COM81N[ O SEWER
MANHOL E

~~~:

:;:~CTURE ) tNT[RC[ P TIN G 0P£N OIU IN

OPEN DRA IN

MANHOLE

WlTH Rl M 8, tNVERT EU: VAT IONS

I•

-.. ~··
,~..,,;.... ' .·•
~-~

c~,,,....

- -~ ~

........

~e~

_ ,..,,r_,, .R!f"~A:'

,,,,.., __,_,~, -4f/llt!;/l,,vS

-

~

H-...sc

c.A,s,:N,'NI

�SANITARY 8 STORM SEWER INVENTORY
_\
M~COLL

AVE

~
~

CLARK

L !VIN6SroN

OF YALE

CITY
SEWER

MASTER

CITY

OF

METROPOLITAN

AVE

a

WATER
INVENTORY
FOR
YALE a
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
PLANNING

EVALUATION

COMMISSION

AVE

~ /.;Ve-

- -o-------~~

~ e-

,t:¥10£

# /

8 " FP,e'C€P'7~//\/

✓l- ·

/.

..

1
i~t, ' ,, ..

I~ "

~AY/TY

.S'l!f:""€"'="

, 11 -

18 "

'

✓6 -

dPTFR,t.{. ,S'l !;l,Vce
F-eP/77 ,t.;96"&amp;'0/V.S

0

100 200

400

800

6 00

,. : 2 00'

C/TY
~ / /77/ r S

OATMA N

LEGEND

-&lt;I

STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
COMB INED SEWER
MANHOLE
INLET
CATCH

STRUCTURE } INT RCEPTING OPEN DRAIN
BASIN
E

OPEN DRAIN

MANHOLE

WITH RIM 8 INV(RT ELEVATIONS

SAN ITARY a STORM SEWER
INVENTORY
CI TY

OF

YALE

�sweeping. Private contractors are used for garbage pick-up and large snow
removal jobs.
I ,

Equipment used to provide the services includes a street sweeper, two trucks,
and a backhoe. One of the trucks can be equipped with a bottom scraper
and a salt distribution device for winter snow management.
C

J

The City's DPW is staffed by two full-time and one part-time employee.
POLICE

Public safety is provided to City residents and business people by the City of
Yale Police Department. The department has three full-time and three parttime officers. Two police cars are used for patrol and emergency response.
I

J

FIRE

The City is served by a 14-member, all-volunteer fire department. The
department houses one pumper truck. In addition, the Brockway Township
Fire Department is housed in the City facility, which adds one tanker truck,
one tanker/pumper combination, one pumper truck, a grass rig, and a 'Jaws
of life" to the equipment available if the City cannot manage the fire alone.
In addition, surrounding municipalities have a mutual aid agreement in the
event of a major fire disaster.
AMBULANCE
I .

Ambulance service is provided to the City and several surrounding townships
by a two person staff and a volunteer force. The City has two ambulances:
one modular and one van. The City Administrator serves as the Ambulance
Director. Currently, 4.25 townships in St. Oair County and 1.5 townships in
Sanilac County - a total of 315 square miles - are served by this ambulance
agency.
ADMINISTRATION

/'

I

I.

The City Administrator and City Oerk comprise the full-time administrative
staff of the City. One part-time employee assists in the day-to-day
administrative duties.
IDSTORICAL SITES

(
The City has two historical sites of note: the McColl House on M-19 and the
Heritage School. The McColl House has been designated as a Michigan
35

�r

Historic Site. The Heritage School is a one-room school house formally
located in Lynn Township. It currently serves as a museum.
LIBRARY
The City of Yale recently opened a new library facility across from City Hall.
This 3,200 square foot building will now house the materials, books, and
maps previously located in the City Hall complex.
INDUSTRIAL PARK
The City currently owns approximately 21 acres of land east of M-19 that it
hopes to develop as an industrial park. The land was originally turned over
to the City by quit claim deed in 1983 after private efforts to develop the
land failed. Two years ago the City made sewer service available; water is
not yet available.
SCHOOLS
The Yale Public School District currently serves 170 square miles in and
around the City of Yale. The District boundaries extended east to the Black
River, north to Sanilac County, west to Capac, and south to 1-69. Facilities
include three elementary schools, a junior high school, and a high school.
The table below shows the current (1989) fourth Friday count for the
individual schools in the District:
Yale Public Schools
1989-90 Census
School
Avoca Elementary
Emmett Elementary
Yale Elementary
Yale Junior High School
Yale High School
Alternative Education
Adult Education
TOTAL

Number of Students
244
229
578
277
609
20
.1Q
1,987

According to Mr. Steve Anderson, Director of Academic Services for Yale
Public Schools, all of the facilities are currently operating over capacity. The
22 temporary trailers used by the District are a visible reminder of this
36

L.

�problem. Mr. Anderson notes that the elementary schools are experiencing
the greatest new demand; the high school demand has decreased slightly.

f

In order to address this capacity problem, the Yale Public School District
formed a facilities advisory committee, and a facilities study was performed
by an architectural firm. Major recommendations are noted below.

•
•
•
•

''

Construct a new high school
Convert current high school to a junior high
Convert current junior high to an administrative/adult ed/special
ed/recreation facility
Expand existing elementary schools

A School District bond issue to finance needed improvements will be voted
on in early 1991.
PARKS AND RECREATION

Parks and recreation facilities serve a wide variety of age groups. Activities
range from active sports such as soccer and football to passive activities such
as picnicking and birdwatching.

I,
f

The purpose of this section is to examine recreation standards, list recreation
facilities located in the City of Yale and its environs, and determine if these
facilities are meeting the planning standards suggested by the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources. The results can be used to determine if
the City should plan for additional recreation and parks facilities.

,

STANDARDS

I

I,

Recognized recreation planning standards are a valuable tool in making an
assessment of future recreation needs. Standards may be used effectively
only as a means for comparing present conditions to what is thought to be
suitable or desirable, and as a general guide toward estimating future needs
and demands. A variety of standards have been developed by various
groups. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources recommends using
the standards developed by the National Recreation and Parks Association.
The major types of recreation resources that the City of Yale should provide
to its residents through future planning of its recreation facilities includes the
following:

L •

L

37

�The mini-park provides specialized facilities that serve a concentrated
or limited population or specific group such as tots or senior citizens.
A small playground is an example of a mini-park.

(

The neighborhood park or playground is designed to serve teenagers
and adults with various types of active group recreational activities
during the entire year. ff possible, the playfield should provide: areas
for paved game courts such as tennis, basketball, volleyball, and
handball; space for shuffleboard and horseshoe courts; sports fields for
men and women such as softball, baseball, football, and soccer; and
picnicking and small children's play areas.
The community park, in general, is designed to serve a number of
neighborhoods, or, in some cases, the entire City. It is suggested that
a major recreation building, designed to meet the needs of all age
groups, be included in the community park. In addition, it should
include: areas of natural beauty with nearby picnic and trail
development; fields and paved courts for various kinds of sports; and
minor playground and playlot development. Other suggested activities
include an outdoor shelter-concert area, outdoor swimming, lighted
spectator-type athletic field, ice skating, and ample off-street parking.

RECREATION Pl.ANNING STANDARDS

f.

Facility

Mini-Park
Standard

Neighborhood Park
Standard

Community Park
Standard

Site Size

1 Acre

15+ Acres

25+ Acres

Service Radius

0.25 Miles

0.25 - 0.5 Miles

1-2 Miles

Acres/1000 People

0.25 to 0.5

1-2 Acres

5-8 Acres

In addition to the above standards, the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources and the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) have
established standards for special facilities. These standards are listed in the
table below.

,,

.

I

L
\

.

l ..

38

�STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL FACILITIBS
I

I ,

Facility

r

Baseball Diamonds•

1 per 6,000

Softball Diamonds

1 per 3,000

Tennis Courts

1 per 4,000

Basketball Courts

1 per 5,000

Swimming Pools (25 yard)*

1 per 10,000

Skating Rinks (artificial)

1 per 20,000

Neighborhood Centers•

1 per 10,000

Community Centers•

1 per 25,000

Golf Courses

1 per 25,000

Soa:er Fields

1 per 20,000

,.

Bicycle Trails

I

Playgrounds

Standard/1000 People

(miles)

Comment
Regulation 90°

Best in battery of 2 or 4

1 per 40,000
1 per 3,000

Source: Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 1986. Building Michigan's Recreation
Future, Appendix B, pages 100-101; and *National Recreation and Parks
Association, Washington, DC

INVENTORY
I

I

I

The City of Yale has one community-level facility for recreation
opportunities, the Yale City Park and Memorial Field. In addition, the
School Board property across the street has additional facilities, which are
more limited in their accessibility to non-students.
During the summer months, The Yale/Brockway Recreation Council
organizes baseball leagues for area youth. The program receives funding
from both the Township and the City. The High School also uses the park
for football games and other activities.

I.
,·

Below is a listing and description of the recreation facilities in the City of
Yale and major facilities in the region.

I

i \

39

�Recreation Inventory
City or Yale and Environs

City Park
Yale City Park &amp; Memorial Field

Picnic grills and tables, five tennis
courts ( two in disrepair), picnic
pavilion, ball diamond, swings, slides,
climbers, football field with
bleachers and scorekeeper's tower,
restrooms, ice skating pond (not in
use), community building (meetings),
lighted horseshoe pits
( 4),
shuffleboard (2), walking, river
amenity, parallel parking for
approximately 80 cars.
Size:
Approximately 37 acres (16.5 north
of Park Avenue and 20.4 acres
south of Park Avenue).

,-

I
I

'

&lt;.

Other Facilities in City
High School/Elementary School

Basketball courts (2), Heritage
School Mini-Museum, swings, slides,
picnic tables, footbaWsoccer field,
and baseball diamonds (5).

Trinity Missionary Church

One ballfield

r
l

•

,·

St. Clair County Parks
Goodells Park

Horsebarns, community building,
playground equipment, ballfield, and
restrooms. Approximate size: 300
acres. Location: 15 miles southeast
of Yale.

_(

Sanilac County Parks (South)

I.

Lexington Park

Picnic facilities, swimming,
restrooms,
and
lakeviews.
Approximately 25 miles northeast
of Yale.

l .

r
f
40

�r

State Parks And Recreation Areas

St. Clair County

lI

Algonac State Park

Camping (300 sites), showers /
restrooms, picnic area, boat launch,
fishing, nature trail, playground,
hunting and snow mobiling.
Approximate size: 1,300 acres.
Located approximately 50 miles
from Yale.

Lakeport State Park

Camping (315 sites), showers,
restrooms, picnic area, ball diatnond,
picnic shelters (2), swimming, cross
country-ski trail, fishing.
Approximate size: 560 acres.
Located approximately 15 miles east
of Yale.

St. Oair Flats State Wildlife Area

Boating, fishing, and· nature study
in a 7,800 acre setting. Located
55 miles south of Yale.

Port Huron State Gatne Area

Located on over 6,100 acres.
Includes boat launch, fishing, nature
study, and hunting.
Located
approximately 15 miles southeast of
Yale.

Sanilac Petroglyphs State Park

Nature trails and indian rock
carvings on 240 acres. Located
approximately 40 miles north of
Yale.

I

r
41

�Historical Sites/Facilities - St. Clair County
St. Clair County
\

\

,

,

Fishing, historic settlement
Active lighthouse
Pine Grove Park
Railroad tunnel to Canada (1890)

Harsen's Island/St. Gair Flats
Fort Gratiot Lighthouse
The Huron Lightship
St. Clair River Tunnel

•

Sanilac County

original 1870 furnishings
Indian carvings

Sanilac Historical Museum
Sanilac Petroglyphs

ANALYSIS

It is obvious from the data presented above that the Yale City Park and
Memorial Field is the premier recreation facility in the City, offering a wide
range of activities. The 37-acre park exceeds the standards suggested for a
community park. With an estimated 1990 population of 1,900 people, the
park provides over 19 acres per 1,000 people, far exceeding the 5-8 acre
standard. All of the City's population is also within the suggested 1-2 mile
service radius. In addition, if the City were to annex additional property in
the future, it would likely fall within the service area. .

r

It is important to note that much of the park property south of Park Avenue
and some of the property north of Park Avenue is floodplain. While this is
an important resource for the community, it cannot be developed for many
active recreation purposes.
From a planning perspective, the only major deficiency in recreation in the
City is the mini-park and neighborhood park categories. The City may want
to consider pursuing two or three additional recreation sites away from the
City Park that can serve a more neighborhood-oriented need. For example,
one half-acre mini-park with playground equipment for children and another
aimed at seniors might be appropriate. Also, a small neighborhood park in
the northeast quadrant of the City with one ballfield and playground
equipment would provide additional recreation opportunities.

.l

It is suggested that the City prepare a Recreation Plan meeting the
guidelines established by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources as
an implementation tool for the Master Plan. The Recreation Plan, once

i
I

42

"
J

I

I

l

•

�f

i
r

approved by MDNR, will make the City eligible for to apply
from three separate grant programs. These programs provide
and 75 percent of the total cost of developing facilities. In
recreation survey of residents performed as part of the plan
pinpoint the types of facilities the community wants.

I

f •

I

'·
r

I

I

I .
'-

.j

43
L

for funding
between 50
addition, a
would help

�GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES
r.
I

INTRODUCTION

The goals and objectives formulated by the Planning Commission are the
cornerstone of the planning process. They are intended to provide the basic
framework for public and private decision-making. The Master Plan's
arrangement of future land uses is based on the community goals for the
future. As such, the goals will effectively direct both public and private
decisions regarding land use and development.

PURPOSES OF THE MASTER PLAN

The purposes of the Master Plan are:

.I
,-

1.

To improve the physical environment of the City as a setting for
human activities and promote the general health, safety and welfare
by making the City more functional, beautiful, decent, healthful,
interesting and efficient.

2.

To promote the public interest, the interest of the community at large,
rather than the interests of individuals or special groups within the
community.

3.

To facilitate the democratic determination and implementation of
community policies and physical development. The plan is primarily
a policy instrument. The plan constitutes a declaration of long-range
goals and objectives and provides the basis for a program to
accomplish the goals.

4.

To effect coordination in community development.

5.

To inject long-range considerations into the determination of shortrange actions.

6.

To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on the making
of decisions concerning the physical development of .the community.

r

!;
l .
,·

I._~
....

r
l

44

�POLICY BASIS

Only through careful analysis of existing conditions and the forces which have
brought them about, can the City understand their interrelationship, identify
their underlying purposes, anticipate future problems, and devise solutions.

,1

I

Accordingly, the community identifies its objectives by relating them to
current problems and issues and to tangible alternative solutions. At the
same time, the City must attempt to anticipate future problems, and
recommend the steps necessary to prevent their development or reduce their
severity.

POLICY PURPOSE

r
I

Administration by city officials, legislative action by city councils, quasijudicial rulings by the zoning boards of appeals, and administrative action
and recommendations by planning commissions are frequently criticized as
being capricious and arbitrary. Clear-cut statements of policy can go far to
minimize the apparent arbitrariness of certain planning and planning related
actions. They can guide and substantiate honest intelligent decisions. They
can also serve the city's Planning Commission as an anchor of objectivity.
Another useful function performed by policy statements is in the area of
informing the public about the thinking of the planning commission with
regard to land development.
DETERMINING POLICY

I

-l

'··

r

,, .

l _,
I
I

'--,

The Master Plan is not just a series of maps. Rather, it is first a series of
statements descnbing the City's goals and objectives. They cannot cover
every situation. Certain areas are so complex that it will be impossible to
know what sort of policy decision can be made until all the facts are
assembled. Also, there must be agreement and consensus in the first place
before such statements can be adopted. Obviously, this concurrence will
not always exist. None of this negates, however, the desirability of
formulating and adopting goals and objectives statements in as many areas
of planning concern as possible.
The first step in the process was the distribution of over 100 community
attitude surveys to a cross-section of the City's population. The results of
this survey are found at the end of this report. The next step of the process
was the futuring session held by the planning commission at a special
meeting on August 15, 1990. At this session, representatives from the
community were invited to discuss and develop a consensus on general
45

�community character, land use preferences, and public facilities and services.
In October 1990, a summary of all previous comments was reviewed, and the
planning commission developed the goals and objectives listed below.

GENERAL COMMUNTIY CHARACTER

GOAL.5:

Maintain and expand Yale's residential housing stock,
while encouraging properly planned economic
development and redevelopment at appropriate
locations.
Incorporate long-range planning ideals into all current
development decisions.

Objectives:

Encourage new subdivision-type residential development
in vacant areas and infill residential development in
existing neighborhoods.
Promote subdivision design standards that result in new
residential neighborhoods that imitate the historical
character of the City's existing neighborhoods.
Maintain and expand the existing central business district
as a community-wide resource .

.

Promote new light industrial development in appropriate
areas to provide local jobs, increased tax base, and
encouragement for new commercial and residential
development.

L

Ensure that non-residential development does not
negatively impact the viability of residential
neighborhoods through appropriate site plan review
standards for new development, code enforcement for
existing violators, and encouraging uniform screening of
unaesthetic uses and/or activities.

r

I
I

l.

HOUSING, RESIDENTIAL GROWTH &amp; DEVELOPMENT

GOAL:

Provide all residents of the City with opportunities for
quality housing.

46

,-

!
----=--~--~~~--

--

-

-

-

�Objectives:

Continue to encourage and maintain a balanced variety
of housing types including single family, two-family,
apartments, special senior citizen housing, both
manufactured and site built.
Encourage infill residential development in the City.
Promote the development of new subdivision-type
development in vacant areas designated for single-family
development.
Adopt and maintain subdivision regulations and site
condominium ordinances to ensure that new residential
development meets minimum design standards to protect
public health, safety, and welfare.
Continue to improve the quality and capacity of water
and sewer services so that these services can be made
available to new residential construction.

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

GOALS:

Actively promote the development of properly planned
industrial growth in areas having the least impact on
residential areas.
Conserve and improve existing commercial businesses by
maintaining a wide variety of shops and services to meet
the needs of the community.

(
I

,.

r

Objectives:

Encourage the location of new industrial development
in the existing industrial park.
Evaluate existing commercial and industrial areas
encroaching upon residential areas to determine
redevelopment potential or to establish additional
buffering.

t

L

Evaluate possible access alternatives for existing
industrial uses whose traffic must travel through
residential neighborhoods.

,,
I

Il

Enact hazardous materials regulations that address
proper site design, and containment and disposal of
47

r

�hazardous materials in a manner that protects natural
features including, but not limited to, ground and surface
water, soils, air quality and wetlands.
Work to eliminate the external impacts of industrial uses
on residential areas through code enforcement and
improved screening.

PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES

GOALS:

Provide police, fire protection, emergency medical
services and other public facilities and services that
adequately meet the community's current and future
needs.
Provide sufficient recreation opportunities for City
residents.

Objectives:

Follow the most cost-effective path when providing
services to City residents.
Explore possibilities for sharing costs of public services
and facilities with surrounding municipalities.
Continue to work towards a feasible means to expand
sewer capacity.
Pursue funding programs to repair and replace existing
roads and sidewalks in disrepair.

r

Study alternatives to provide water service to the
industrial park at a level of service necessary to meet
industry fire-fighting needs.

i

'

Monitor fire and rescue service to ensure that these
services keep pace with demand.

r
I

l

L.
r;

Continue to expand the scope of the City's recycling
efforts as warranted.

-

48

�PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

GOALS:

Maintain the existing community park and open space
to preserve these resources for current and future
residents.
Continue to explore additional opportunities for
recreational programs and facilities.

Objectives:

Prepare a City Recreation Plan consistent with the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources' guidelines,
and pursue funding for high priority recreation facilities
and programs.
Strive to improve the quality and recreation potential of
the Mill Creek water course and the community's other
natural areas.
Use all available State and Federal grant programs to
stretch the City's available recreation dollars.
Work with Brockway Township to evaluate ways to
expand and improve recreation programs.
Provide all residential areas with safe, convenient access
to neighborhood playground facilities and green spaces.
Explore the possibility of converting the railroad corridor
to a recreation trail in the event it is abandoned by the
railroad operator.

C

I

ROADS AND TRANSPORTATION

GOAL:

Provide all land uses with adequate access to the road
system.
Strive to mmnruze through-traffic disruptions on
thoroughfares, while keeping through traffic off the local
residential streets.
Strive to maintain a multi-modal transportation system,
including bicycles, walking, buses, and automobiles,
where feasible.
49

�Objectives:

r

Promote a system of roads that is easily maintained.
Improve access and emergency service by maintaining
site plan review standards that ensure smooth ingress
and egress by emergency vehicles.
Work toward obtaining right-of-way dedications and
reservations, consistent with the City's Thoroughfare
Plan, as new developments are reviewed for approval.
Limit the number of driveways and curbcuts on major
and secondary thoroughfares to the minimum necessary
to provide for safe ingress and egress.
Promote the development of joint-use driveways and
internal connections between adjoining businesses to
reduce the number of curb cuts on major thoroughfares.
Pursue funding programs to repair and replace existing
roads and sidewalks in disrepair.
Explore the feasibility of encouraging or providing other
modes of transportation besides automobiles as part of
the City's overall transportation system.

,-

{

I
1·

t
r

!.
I'

... .

r.

L

so

�CI1Y OF YALE
COMMUNI1Y A'ITITUDE SURVEY
The following summarizes the results of the City of Yale Planning Commission's survey of community attitudes. The
survey was taken during July 1990, and the results will be used to assist the Planning Commission in forming goals
and objectives and making land use decisions as part of its new Master Plan for the City.
The survey was distributed to over 100 people chosen by Planning Commissioners as being representative of a wide
range of interests. Sixty six surveys were returned, which is a sampling of approximately 3.5 percent of the population
and 9 percent of households. The results are shown in percentages unless otherwise noted. Totals may not equal
100 percent due to rounding.
PERCENT

A

~

GENERAL

;5
0:::

0
c..

~

Please indicate bow important each of the following was in
influencing your decision to reside (or work) in the City.

i

~

0

::E

~~

0:::
c..

0{I)

~

1.

2.

3.
4.
5.
6.

Close to work
Near friends and relatives
School system
Property tax rates
Price of home
Other (list below)

i
0:::
0

c..

~

E-

0

z

15 . 29
17 28
24 25

56
54
51
52

34

65

18

14
16

See Attached Sheet

L

7.

Do you own or rent your place of residence?

Own 85

Rent 15

8.

Do you live within the City limits?

Yes 97

No 3

9.

How long have you lived in the City of Yale?

Average: 20.3 years•; Range: 8 mos. - 73 years•

10.

Do you work in the City of Yale?

Yes 54

No 46

11.

Do you have children living with you? If so,
how many?

Yes 71

No 29

Under 21: J

12.

What is your age?

13.

How far do you drive to work each day (one wav) ?

• - actual number

21-30:

~

31-50: 55

50-65: 12

20 Miles* (average)

Number 2* (average)

Over 65: 22

�B.

For each of the following, please choose the answer that best
describes your feelings:

r

14.

z

IAND USE PREFERENCES

0

z;;:

al
al

al
al

a:
&lt;

a:
0
&lt;

0
0

0

z

Q

Existing shopping facilities are adequately serving the
needs of City residents and employees.

39

8

53

The City should promote the development of vacant
or underdeveloped commercial and industrial sites
by identifying them and promoting their availability to
developers and businesspersons.

88

8

4

The provision of greenbelts and landscaping in conjunction
with the development of new industrial and commercial buildings should be encouraged.

86

7

7

Existing recreational areas and facilities are adequate to
serve community needs.

55

7 38

Additional local parks serving seniors
should be provided.

39

27

34

Additional local parks with playground facilities
should be provided.

42

22

36

The construction of additional bike paths and sidewalks in
the City should be encouraged.

71

14

15

The City should encourage the improvement of older residential
stock.

86

14

0

Cl)

r

15.

16.

17.
18.
I

\

{_

19.

20.
21.
22.

(
\\~

List the types of additional land uses you
would like to see developed.
See Attached Sheet

~

-t.

0
0
0
0

C.

PUBLIC SERVICES

In your view, ho~ adequate are the following services?

,-

L

23.

24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.

Police protection
Fire protection
Ambulance services
Rubbish pickup
Library
Roadway and sidewalk maintenance
Schools
Recreation facilities and programs
Stormwater drainage

0
0
0
0

49

76
74
30
82
25
38

27
24

:'.j a:
c::
0

~ ""'0

17
19 5
17 9
22 48
10 8
20 54
39 21
27 46
23 53

34

�r

D.

~
0

~

SERVICES PREFERENCE

r"

Please respond to each of the following questions as required
32.
33.

Should the City play an active role in encouraging the
development of additional senior citizen housing.

~

~

64

0

z
22

:z:
0

Q

14

What additional public services would you like to see initiated
or upgraded in the City?
See Below

34.

What do you feel are the two most significant problems facing
the City?
See Below

35.

What are the two most positive features or qualities the City
has to offer?
See Below

Open-ended Questions (Multiple Answers)
22.

More young subs, recreation, schools, industrial, multi-family on outskirts, housing. (no multiple answers to
this questions).

33.

drinking water (8), enforce nuisance ordinance (4), sewer/water (4), recycling (3), road/sidewalk repair (3),
tickets for loitering (2), DPW better staffed (2), garbage trucks on schedule (2), more for children (2).

34.

sewer/water (21), business growth/ lack of industry/ lack of development (9), no business competition (4),
absentee landlords (2), and need progressive leaders (2).

35.

small and friendly (14), hospitaVmedical care (8), nice place to live (6), schools (4), Bologna festival (3), close
to big cities (2), parks and recreation (2), low crime (2).

r

I

'-

'

I

-,

'

\_

[

l-_

f
!

r

I
l-

�r

THOROUGHFARE PLAN

,

I
I_·

..

I

(
I-

[
r

-L

A transportation system provides a means to move people and goods among
various geographical areas. Because transportation has a significant impact
on economic conditions, environmental quality, energy consumption, land
development, and the overall quality of life in a community, it is critical that
future transportation needs and problems be anticipated and reflected in the
Master Plan process.
The interrelationship between transportation and other community functions
can be further described by examining the many purposes and functions of
roadways. The primary purpose of roadways is to move goods and people.
Roads and their associated rights-of-way also provide locations for public
utilities including water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, gas, electrical power,
and telephone lines. Public services such as police, fire, and emergency
rescue rely on the safe and adequate provision of roadways. Streets and
rights-of-way also provide opportunities for landscaping, public art, and
monuments.
In many communities, there is a historical significance to the arrangement of
streets, and the street pattern impacts the character of the community. The
original plan for Washington, D.C. was created by a French national who was
greatly influenced by a vision of the United States as a great industrial nation
with a strong centralized federal government. He positioned the Capital
building in a prominent location, with a radial plan of boulevards and
roadways. The Capital building became the dominant feature and hub from
which all major roadways began.

The layout of the City of Yale and surrounding area was influenced by the
Ordinance of 1785 (Northwest Ordinance), which established a land survey
system to give settlers moving west of the Appalachians a definite description
of their land. The area was divided into congressional townships each six
miles square. Each township thus contained thirty-six square miles and each
one square mile was called a section.
The establishment of townships and sections not only made land
identification easier, but it also provided a logical system for the provision
of roadways along section lines. Major north-south mile roads include
Main/Sayles in the City, and Jorden and Duquette in the Brockway
Township. The major east-west mile roads are North/Park/Yale Road in the
City, and Jeddo and Oatman/Speaker in Brockway Township. Most of the
local streets also followed a grid pattern layout.
54

�•

I

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROADS

Because of the prominence of certain roadways, their physical condition, and
the overall land-use pattern in American cities, automobile traffic tends to
be concentrated on certain roadways. On average, 80 percent of travel is
done on about 20 percent of the roads. In order to set priorities for funding
certain roads with the highest volumes, transportation planners established
a road classification system.
Although there is some variation in the classification of roadways, they are
typically divided into roadways that carry local traffic and roadways that carry
through traffic. Through roadways are further divided according to their
function. The distinction between local and through traffic is made because
of the substantially different kind of street required to serve both types of
traffic. To eliminate conflicts between these two levels of traffic carriers, it
is desirable to separate them as much as possible.
The overall traffic circulation system, with both local and through streets,
must be carefully integrated in order to function successfully. Local streets
include both traditional neighborhood streets and cul-de-sacs.
Due to variations in traffic flow, there can be several types of streets, ranging
from freeways to local streets. The three basic types of roads in City of Yale
are arterials, collectors, and local streets. The graphic on the following page
shows how these various road types are typically reflected in a road plan,
and the page following that illustrates the role of each road classification in
providing access and mobility.
FREEWAYS

i

·Il

(

L

A freeway is designed to handle large volumes of traffic moving at high
speeds over long distances or between urban areas. Experience has shown
that this demand often cannot be met by the addition of lanes to existing
major thoroughfares. Hence, the provision of a freeway often is the only
answer to the problem of overburdened thoroughfares. Its capacity is
increased greatly by the elimination of all at-grade intersections and all
driveway cuts for frontage access. Points of entrance and exit are carefully
controlled to maximize roadway capacities. The City of Yale has no direct
freeway access.

ss

�STREET CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CONCEPT

r
\

.

&gt;,

ca

~

0
..J

ca

[

.
Q)
Q)

SchoolPark

u

LL

l_

Local

-

I

·l

Arterial

I-

l
(

I.

B/A

BIRCHLER / ARROYO
ASSOCIATES

�MOBILITY &amp; LAND ACCESS RELATIONSHIPS
BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

r
I

Major Arterial

Minor Arterial

Collector

Local

I

\.

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

[
-l.

D

Mobility

□.

Access

[
L-

f
rI

L

Source: Federal Highway Administration

B/A

BIRCHLER/ARROYO
ASSOCIATES

�ARTERIALS
Arterial roads are the backbone of the one mile grid system. They provide
continuity from one township/city to another, and they can carry long trips
when a freeway alternative is not provided. In fact, some major arterials
resemble mini-freeways by providing a wide median strip, partially-controlled
access, and six or eight through lanes.
Arterial roads are intended to serve through traffic volumes while providing
access to abutting properties and minor intersecting streets. It is this dual
function that often leads to congestion and traffic accidents because of
turning vehicles conflicting with or impeding through traffic. These problems
can sometimes be minimized in business districts by the use of service drives
and/or internal connections between individual businesses that allow an
overall reduction in the number of driveway connections to the arterial road.
Arterial roads in the City include Main Street/Brockway Road and Park
Avenue/ North Street. Within the four square mile planning area, Jeddo
Road, Duquette Road, Jorden Road, and Speaker/Oatman Road are
classified as arterials.
COLLECTOR STREEI'S
The collector street system provides both land access and traffic circulation
within residential, commercial and industrial areas. The purpose of a
collector street is to collect vehicles from the local streets and distnbute
them to either local destinations or to an arterial. Collector streets can also
provide internal circulation and access to non-residential areas such as
industrial parks and major shopping centers.

l

Sayles is the only collector street in the City of Yale at the present time.
LOCAL OR MINOR STREETS

r
I

L

r

The sole function of local streets is to provide access to adjacent land.
These streets make up a large percentage of total street mileage of the City,
but will always carry a small portion of the vehicle miles of travel. Local
neighborhood streets and industrial district service drives should provide
access to collector streets or to longer distance through routes, but in such
a manner that through traffic is not encouraged to use the minor streets as
a shortcut route.
Most of the roads in the City of Yale can be classified as local streets,
although right-of-way width varies somewhat. The accepted standard for
58

�local street right-of-way is 66 feet. Several of the older roads in the City
have 50 feet and a few have 40 feet or less.

EXISTING VOLUMES, CAPACI'I1ES, AND ROAD NE'IWORK

One of the components of a thoroughfare plan is an evaluation of existing
traffic conditions. The Existing Volumes Map shows the 24-hour traffic
volumes on the major roadways. In order to prepare this map, data was
collected from the St. Qair County Road Commission and Michigan
Department of Transportation. All counts were taken in 1988 or 1989.
The two main roads in the City, M-19 (Main Street) and Park/North, are the
only roads on which regular counts are taken. Typically, a two-lane roadway
has a maximum capacity of approximately 19,000 vehicles per day (Level of
Service E). Volumes in excess of this level can be found, but only in neargridlock conditions (Level of Service F). The maximum volume acceptable
to most agencies is based on Level of Service D, which in this case would
yield a maximum acceptable volume of 11,200 vehicles per day. Therefore,
there is adequate capacity for future growth.
The Existing Conditions Map identifies some thoroughfare problem areas.
These problem areas, which were identified during a windshield field survey,
can be classified under four categories:

■
■
■

■

road off-set alignment
skewed intersection with angles less than 90 degrees or unusual
configurations
major at-grade rail crossings
unpaved roads

These problem areas vary in terms of their impact on the road system.
Many of the road off-set alignments are on minor streets with little traffic.
The at-grade rail crossings are not presently causing any major problems
because of the limited rail traffic. When possible and economically
justifiable, these problem areas should be addressed.

[

__

r

l
r

Another problem area identified by the Planning Commission is the lack of
emergency access from the west side of town to the downtown district and
hospital area in the event the Park Avenue bridge is out of service. With
the existing road network, emergency vehicles would have to travel gravel
roads in Brockway Township for several miles as part of a detour route.

59

�....

~;=======-=--=--=-=--~~==~:;::::::========::5~[i~~•oADs=;=:~==;=;=================~ L

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC

4,000

&gt;N
ING

I
I
I

i

ri
I

- ,

EXISTING VOLUMES
CIIT OF YALE PIA.._""\,NG COMMISSION
ST. CLAIR COUNTY, \UCHIGAN

400

7

1r--==~•o.a"-----=====::::::::======~~--=-_- '-_ . I

B/A

800

BIRCHLIR/AUOlO
ASSOCIATU

:000

�- UNPAVED ROAD
UNIMPROVED ROAD

0

PROBLEM INTERSECTION

OS
AG
AL

OFF-SET ALIGNMENT
AT-GRADE RAIL CROSSING
SKEWED ALIGNMENT

EXISTING CONDITIONS
CITY OF YALE PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. CLAIR COUNlY, MICHIGAN
FEF:r

400

BI/.'I A

800

BIRCHLER /ARROYO
ASSOCIATES

�It should be noted that other problem areas may exist; those noted above
are based on a 'windshield survey', not a scientific analysis.
As the City reviews plans by the St. Oair County Road Commission,

Michigan Department of Transportation or developers for new road work,
it should note these problem areas and try to work toward satisfactory
improvements. In addition, if the State legislature enacts enabling legislation
permitting municipalities to require off-site improvements from developers,
the City should attempt to resolve these problems when the opportunity
presents itself.

THOROUGHFARE PLAN
The map on the following page shows the Thoroughfare Plan for the City of
Yale. The plan identifies the appropriate right-of-way necessary for roads
classified as arterials (120 feet outside downtown; 66 feet within downtown),
collectors (86 feet), and local streets (66 feet). Some of the existing local
streets with less than 66 feet of right-of-way retain their existing right-of-way
width.
Two right-of-way widths have been established for arterials for the following
reasons:
■

The accepted standard for arterials/thoroughfares used by the St. Clair
County Road Commission and other public agencies is 120 feet. This
width allows for the eventual widening to five lanes (60 feet), where
needed, with 30 feet of additional right-of-way on each side for
utilities and sidewalks. Although the need for widening Jeddo Road,
for example, to five lanes is obviously a long way off, the acquistion
of right-of-way through dedications and other means should be an ongoing goal of the City.

60'

- - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 0·- - - - - - - - - - - - ~

62

�ARTERIAL (120' ROW)
ARTERIAL - LTD. (66' ROW)
COLLECTOR (86' ROW)
LOCAL STREET (66 ROW*)

• 1• 1 •

* With the following exceptions:
Existing Local Stmets ( &lt; &lt;,6' ROW)

l,1 I

I- I -

Bettes Street
Clark Street
High Street
Jean Street
Jones Street
Livingston Street
Mary Street
McColl Street
St. Clair Street
Spring Street
Will Street
Wood Street

I

I

-

I -

4U
5ft

511
QT

50'

50'
60'
SO'
50'
9.1
50'
40'

FUTURE LOCAL (f,6' ROW)

I -

Road Alignments are Conceptual

I

1
_j

°" ......

THOROUGHFARE PLAN
._J

-· ·-·-·----

CITY OF YALE PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. CLAIR COUNIY, MICHIGAN
FEET

I

VE,oJCEJl; • OAll

-·-··

400

B/A

800

BI RCHUR / ARROYO

ASSOC IATES

�--------------------

•

The acquisition of 120 feet of right-of-way in the downtown area of
Yale is not practical because storefronts abut the existing 66 foot
right-of-way width. Other homes, churches, and businesses are built
close to the 66-foot right-of-way. In addition, five lanes of traffic is
not practical or desireable in this area. In order to accomplish a fivelane section, on-street parking would have to be eliminated. The City
of Yale should vigorously opposes any attempt to eliminate on-street
parking downtown because of the potential negative impact on
businesses. Downtown parking is convenient for shoppers and it
provides pedestrians with a perceived sense of protection from
through traffic.

The Thoroughfare Plan map also shows future local streets within the current
City limits. These road alignments show where the extension of future local
streets is logical and where new roads are needed.
In the northwest portion of the City, the extension of High Street, Fourth
Street, and First Street are shown on the plan. The extensions of Second
and Third Streets are limited due to the existing and anticipated future
expansion of the senior apartment complex. A connection from First and/or
Fourth Street to the residential (UR) property behind the senior complex
is also shown.

The northeast portion of the City shows the extensions of Euclid Street and
Fraser Street to the east. New roads are not shown in the multi-family area
directly south because it will likely develop with internal private roads.
The southeast quadrant of the City shows both a new residential street
system and a new industrial street system. The residential system is
anticipated to tie into a new multi-purpose public road that will link M-19
with the new residential section, existing businesses, the sewage treatment
lagoons, and some new industry. The industrial road system will connect M19 with the new industrial park and the industrial park expansion area.
\

I

In the southwest portion of the City, the extensions of McColl, Oark, and
Livingston Streets are planned. The road system for the future development
of the partially-platted subdivision to the west of the school property is also
shown. A connection between this subdivision and Oark Street is shown to
improve emergency access to this area. In the event the Park Avenue bridge
is blocked or goes out of service, this connection should be controlled to
permit emergency access only, as through traffic would not be appropriate
in this area.

When new subdivision or site condominium development occurs outside the
current City limits, the need for additional collector and local roads will have
64

�to be addressed. A large development of an entire section would certainly
require collector half or quarter mile roads. These can be reviewed at the
time of individual development submittal. Local streets within subdivisions
should be constructed with a minimum right-of-way of 66 feet.
ACCESS MANAGEMENT

One of the purposes of preparing a Master Plan is to not only plan roads,
land uses, etc., but also to identify ways to implement the recommendations
in the Plan. This section is intended to identify techniques that the City can
implement through site plan review and other procedures.
The premise behind the implementation of access management techniques
is that property owners should be provided reasonable, but not unlimited,
access to their property. Safe and efficient access maximizes available road
capacity on through streets, reduces accident potential, and provides for
reasonable ingress and egress to property.
There are many access management techniques that can be implemented by
the City ranging from adequate driveway spacing to frontage roads. These
techniques are usually implemented through the site plan review process.
The standards noted below are suggested as guidelines in the site plan review
process. Each case will require an individual judgement and analysis to
determine the appropriate action given the characteristics of the site and use.
DRIVEWAY SPACING/PLACEMENT
I

'

One of the primary access management techniques is driveway spacing and
placement. Driveways located too close together are safety hazards and they
can negatively impact capacity.
The figures on the following page show how accident rates increase as the
number of access points increase and the effect of controlled access
techniques on accidents and fatalities in urban and rural areas. These two
figures clearly illustrate bow unmanaged access on arterials has a negative
impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The problem
is even more evident in rural areas such as the City of Yale and Brockway
Township.
The table on the next page shows the recommended spacing of driveways
based on roadway speed. As an example, a 45 mph speed limit roadway
should have driveways spaced at least 230 feet to avoid turning conflicts,
increase safety, and improve capacity.

65

�ACCIDENT RA TES FOR ROAD SECTIONS
WITH DIFFERENT ACCESS POINT FREQUENCIES

l .
r

I

0

4 W ,..

I te U.1 It \II SI.I ll W

sa.t

IO IA Z:U 14 ..

n.a

ACCESS POINTS PER MILE

EFFECT OF CONTROL OF ACCESS ON ACCIDENTS
AND FATALITIES IN URBAN AND RURAL AREAS

.

FATALITIES

ACCIDENTS

•

••
5

=
.,:I
d

500

z

400

::::i

300

%
~

2

•

10 ~
%

,f
z

.,2

• :I=

..-

8

8

;

200

~

100

r

•

~

;"'

0

-

Sour=

Ill/ML

URMH

RURAL

2:
.,E
oe...

Aotaa MallaJCIIICDI b Slnctl &amp; ffilhwa)'I. U.S. ~ ol.
Trampanaliaa. FHWA, 19112.

Recommended Driveway Spacing Distances*
Driveway Spacing (feet)

Road Speed (mph}

85
105

20
25
30

125

35

150

40
45

185
230

so

275

•near curb to near curb
Source: Flora, John W. and Kenneth Mikeitt, Access Management for Streets and Highways.
FHWA Report IP-82-3, June 1982; and Glennon, J.C., eL al., Technical Guidelines
for the Control of Direct Access to Arterial Highways. Volumes I and IL FHWA
Report RD-76-86, August 1975.
66

�r
L

r

In cases where narrow lot widths make implementation of the above
guidelines burdensome, other options can be explored. One option is to
provide a frontage road parallel to the main street that provides access to
several properties with only one or two primary driveways or curb-cuts on
the main road. Another option is to construct a shared driveway on the
property line that can be used by two property owners.

I

NUMBER OF DRIVEWAYS
For many of the reasons noted above, it is also important to regulate the
number of driveways each development has onto a major roadway. In
general, the following guidelines should be followed:
All development should be provided with safe and reasonable access
from public streets using the minimum number of access points
(driveways) necessary to achieve this goal.
Where access via a shared driveway, frontage road (located between
a public street and front building setback), or rear service road
(located in rear yard) is not possible, one two-way drive or two oneway drives (one inbound and one outbound) may be provided.
Additional driveways may be provided when it is demonstrated that
one driveway cannot safely and efficiently handle the volume of traffic
anticipated by the proposed development. If property frontage
exceeds 600 feet, an additional driveway may be permitted.•
I

•.

If a property has access to both an arterial and collector or other
minor street, access shall be from the collector/minor street.

ALTERNATIVE ACCESS
As noted above, a reduction in the number of driveways provides many

benefits to the community and property owners. This reduction can be
accomplished by limiting each development to one driveway, where feasible.
But there are other alternatives which can provide even greater benefits by
having more than one development share one access point.
Shared Driveways
One way to accomplish a net reduction of driveways to less than one per
non-residential development is by installing a shared driveway. A shared

r

• Recommended in Access Management for Streets and Highways. published
by the Federal Highway Administration.
67

�■

driveway is typically located along a property line, with both owners having
access via an easement. Depending on the internal layout of the properties
and the characteristics of the particular locations, this can be excellent
strategy to manage access for higher volume driveways. Sight distance
concerns, relationships to other driveways/roads, project financing, and other
factors may prolubit the use of this technique.
Service Roads
Rear service roads provide common access to several non-residential
properties from the rear of the parcels. The road is constructed parallel to
the public road right-of-way, and it is typically constructed by property
owners. Access to the public street is provided via a collector or minor
street which intersects with the main arterial. This concept is very similar to
a public alley, although the service road is constructed to meet greater
standards due to high volumes and "greater than service vehicle" traffic.
Frontage Roads
A frontage road is located parallel to the public street right-of-way, and is
located between the right-of-way and the front yard building setback. This
type of road crosses several properties but only has one or two access points
(typically). In the case of a major frontage road system, it may run for one
mile or more, providing an access point to the main arterial road every 1/8
to 1/4 mile.
REAR SERVICE ROAD

EXAMPLE

PARKING

PARKING

300-400 FEET

I

60-100 FEET

PARKING

,-

lFRONTAGE ROAD

EXAMPLE
68

-- - - --

-

---------

30FEET

�This type of roadway is often implemented in underdeveloped areas prior to
the on-set of new development because of the separate parallel right-of-way
necessary. There must be ample setbacks in place to install this type of
system. Typically, the frontage road is located 30 feet from the main arterial
road right-of-way, although additional separation at access points to the main
arterial is necessary to achieve smooth traffic flow.
Frontage roads can be constructed privately using access easements and a
common link from one property to the next. As with public right-of-way, the
distance between the main arterial and the frontage road will have to be
increased at access points in order to accommodate storage of outbound
vehicles exiting from the frontage road to the main arterial.
CONCLUSION

This chapter provides recommendations for future roadways, identifies
problem areas in need of correction, and suggests ways to implement access
management techniques to improve safety and road capacity. Careful
periodic evaluation of roads and their function is critical to a successful
program to manage growth and its associated impacts.

.

\

I •

t.
I

-I

,.,

'(

.

•

�COMMERCIAL &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREAS PLAN

INTRODUCTION

Commercial and industrial growth and development in Yale has been slow
in recent years. Many of the older areas have not kept up with modern
standards for building orientation, provision of customer and employee
parking, landscaping and other site amenities. As a result, some of these
areas have higher vacancy rates, attract marginal tenants, and have greater
impacts upon nearby residential neighbors.
This chapter will address modern standards for commercial, office, industrial
and research uses. Areas that are appropriate for redevelopment or
improvement will be identified. Locational characteristics for shopping and
employment centers will also be discussed.

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY

Commercial and office areas can be developed to exist in harmony with
adjoining residential neighborhoods, through the application of modern
design standards in local zoning regulations, administrative review of
development plans, and vigorous code enforcement. All new development
and redevelopment should demonstrate:

'

\_
!

-1

\.,

■

Adequate on-site parking for daily peak hours

■

Direct access from a major arterial street

■

Service roadways for internal circulation, where feasible

■

Adequate separation of parking and service facilities from abutting
residential areas by means of screen walls and/or landscaped
greenbelts

■

Separate facilities on-site for pedestrian and vehicular circulation

■

Landscaping to improve individual business appearance and district
image, by such techniques as planting areas that screen or deemphasize large parking lots

r

,I

I

' ..

r
'
r

70

�I

l .

I

■

Appropriate business signage for identification that does not attempt
to compete with neighbors in terms of size and advertizing messages

■

Provision of internal vehicular connections between adjoining business
developments in order to reduce curb cuts and potential points of
traffic conflict on the thoroughfares

Even industrial and research establishments have been shown to coexist
alongside residential neighbors,, with careful attention to modern site design
standards. Equally important is the need to establish a modern, progressive
image for the industrial district in order to attract the highest caliber of new
development to the City. A properly balanced tax base and a reliable local
employment base relies on attracting and keeping high quality industry and
upgrading areas presently characterized by marginal industrial businesses.
Characteristics of properly planned and developed industrial parks and
districts should include:
■

Fast, easy and convenient access to the local and regional
transportation network.

■

Reasonable location with respect to labor supply, source of
parts/materials, and customer markets.

■

Generous development sites, free of such constraints as unstable soil
and poor drainage, with room for future expansion.

■

An adequate and reliable system of municipal services &amp; utilities:
sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage, police &amp; fire protection.

■

Protection from encroachment of residential and other incompatible
land uses.

■

Modern site design to create a progressive image of the City:

./

parking and service areas located to the side or rear
i

I •

front setback areas reserved for landscaping and visitor parking
only
uniform location and appropriate size, height, materials and
illumination of business signs

r
I

\I-~-

71

�■

Physical location and site layout that minimize or eliminates adverse
impacts on neighboring non-industrial uses:
screening of parking and service areas, including loading
docks/zones.
screening of all outdoor storage and limits on the heights of
stacked materials.
uses with frequent outdoor activities should locate within the
interior of industrial zones.
heavy industry
neighborhoods.

should

not

directly

abut

residential

INDUSTRIAL / COMMERCIAL IMPACT AREAS

Older central cities and small towns often take on a character that is unique
to that community and easily recognizable as such. Sometimes this results
from an unusual street pattern, architectural building styles, or similar
historical characteristics. Some development, however, is characterized by
its anonymity more than anything else. The end result of this similarity is
that communities can lack their own unique "image" particularly in linear
business districts and corner shopping centers.
An impact area is a location where commercial or industrial development is
influencing residential areas or, in one case, the Main Street corridor. The
map on the following page shows negative industrial influences and
commercial areas in need of improvements. The appendix contains a
detailed description of the impact areas.

General Observations

I

) .

i

(

'-

The entire commercial frontage on Main Street lacks a common theme or
unique identity. A downtown development plan would help identify market
potential, actions to attract more people to the area, sidewalk and parking
improvements, facade and sign standards, and actions to bring some of the
marketing techniques used in indoor shopping malls to the downtown
shopping district. A downtown development authority, chamber of commerce
program, or city program could also establish a low-interest loan program for
merchants willing to make facade and sign improvements consistent with a
72

'.
l

I

�l===f::::::i ~,

l=±=:j_

MORRELL

I
11111111
I

Negative Industrial Influences on Residential
Areas

STREET

...........~;;.;;;;;-=-,.~............- - -

GUY

•••••••••

Commercial Areas in Need of Better Access
Control, Improved Parking Layout, and/or
Better Vehicle/Pedestrian Separation

~....,......,......,......,..~

Commercial Areas in Need of Better Screening
and/or Rear Facade Improvements

UJ~--..

~~

. . . . ...L.,_

--

Note:

Industrial influence area not shown on map: junk yard
near Jean Street
Commercial area in need of screening not shown on
map: car wash and gas station at Second and Main

__, Cl) l'-'i'~r'r""i:..:.::lllli...

NORTH

STREET

~I

~

UJ
UJ

f=

Cl)

i

MECHANIC STREET
. . _ _... Cl)

_......,_ _..,.Ul~--)==:::::t

z

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL IMPACTS

--+-----.10
....,

--

L_

.WOOD -

City of Yale Planning Commission
~

STREET••

J ---

Not to Scale

'

\

B/A

I

\

~

MILL

STREET

BIRCHLER /ARROYO
ASSOCIATES

�downtown design plan. The City is currently pursuing funding that could be
used to prepare a downtown design plan and establish an appropriate theme
or identity.
The alleys behind the main commercial buildings fronting on Main Street
should also be thought of as a critical part of the overall image of downtown.
Expanding the central business district east and west will place these "rear"
facades in a more prominent location. With the addition of more off-street
parking east of Main Street, the rear facades will have increased exposure
to potential patrons. Store owners should be encouraged to provide
improved rear entries for customers since new parking will likely put most
customers in close proximity to the back of stores.

I

I

,.'

Parking capacity problems in the downtown area appear to be isolated in
certain areas. West of Main, ample public parking of approximately 40
paved and 15 unpaved spaces is provided south of Mechanic. North of
Mechanic, the large City lot south of the new library is in the process of
being paved to provide approximately 55 spaces. Plenty of on-street parking
is provided along Main Street and intersecting side streets. The major
capacity problem observed west of Main was near the Total service station
and Braggs Party Store. Due to the high level of traffic generated by the
party store, parking is not always available nearby. Redesign of the Total
station will help alleviate parking on the sidewalk and in the driveway;
however, the capacity problem should be addressed with development of a
parking lot behind the buildings on the east half of the block or relocation
of the party store to a site with more convenience parking. The east side of
Main Street needs additional public parking, and this can be provided as part
of the redevelopment of the area.
The appearance and function of industrial uses in the City is just as
important as it is for commercial uses. The east facade of Hughes Industries
is an example of an attractive design that reflects quality. Unfortunately, onsite maintenance and attractive exterior facades are not the strong suit of
most City businesses. Industry near the downtown core should participate
in a sign and facade improvement program. Outside the CBD, new industry
should focus on the City's industrial park where a quality development
meeting modern design standards will serve as an asset to the community.

\I.. .•\

(
I

'-·

r-.

74

�COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN

The Land Use Plan map at the end of the Land Use Plan chapter shows the
boundaries of the downtown district (DD) and the location of a smaller
general business area. The industrial areas are discussed below in the next
section.
The downtown district is a predominant community resource in Yale. Its
boundaries include Wood Street to the south and Kennifick and the rail
right-of-way to the east. The north and west boundaries meander somewhat.
A primary function of the downtown district is to serve as a retail and office
hub for Yale and the surrounding rural area. This district should continue
to serve as a community and neighborhood level shopping area. However,
it is important that the DD serve a mix of uses. Other uses should continue
to include public and quasi-public uses, limited second floor residential,
limited single family residential, and limited individual multi-family units. It
is intended that industrial uses will eventually relocate to more appropriate
areas in the City.
Because retail and service-oriented office uses rely on pass-by traffic and
exposure to Main Street, property fronting on Main Street in the DD should
contain commercial uses. Away from Main Street, the interaction of various
land uses, including residential, is an important part of the unique character
that makes the DD more than just a business center. Without the churches,
single family homes, and small multi-family units, Yale's downtown would
lose an important quality that cannot be substituted with more retail
development.

.I

'

rI .

r·

I'·
.,j
'

One of the primary roles of residential in the DD, both single family and
multi-family, is to serve as transition from the less intense adjacent residential
neighborhoods to the more intense DD area. For example, a single family
home located in the DD, across the street from a residential district, would
soften the impact of the business district on the residential zone. The same
would also apply to a small multi-family complex. As the DD continues to
evolve, the many components that make it a unique resource must be
preserved and enhanced.
The other commercial area shown is General Business south of the existing
City limits. Desired uses include businesses requiring large tracts of land not
available in the DD, automobile dealerships, farm implements dealers, home
center stores, and the like.

75

�It is important to note that commercial development has been limited to
these two main areas because of an important land use goal: concentrate
commercial development. Communities that have allowed commercial
development to "sprawl" in a linear fashion along major roads have often
ended up with unattractive, marginal businesses; intrusion into numerous
residential areas; traffic congestion; and increased traffic accidents.
Residential along major roads is an excellent alternative when developed so
that all lots front on an interior street intersecting with the main street.

r·

I

The property fronting along Brockway Road/Main Street south of Wood
Street has not been included as a commercial area. Although there are
currently several scattered businesses along this corridor, the predominant
character is residential, including several historic structures. Additional
intrusion of new commercial and office uses in this area is not desirable,
particularly when land and building space is available in the DD. An
alternative may be to establish a unique residential zoning district in this area
allowing for limited business uses within existing homes such as bed and
breakfast inns, small offices, home occupations, and antique dealers. This
would provide some flexibility while preserving the residential character of
the area.

'

INDUSTRIAL LAND USE PLAN
As noted previously, industrial development is currently found in numerous

locations in the City. Some of these locations intrude upon and negatively
impact adjacent residential areas.
I
I

'

i .
\_

i '
l.

The Land Use Plan shows one primary industrial location and a secondary
location area. The primary location is the City's proposed 26-acre Industrial
Park, located near the south end of town, east of M-19. Also included
within this primary location is an adjacent 57 acre parcel in Brockway
Township. The secondary area includes the Hughes Industries site north of
the CBD.

CTIY INDUSTRIAL PARK

l
i.
•...:

The success of an industrial park depends on many factors including land
price, proximity to raw materials and an end market, availability of
workforce, and availability of public facilities and services. One of the
traditional locational factors often critical to industry is rail access. However,
rail usage has declined and there has been a corresponding increasing
76

r

�reliance on surface transportation. Rail service within the City is virtually
non-existent, and the future outlook is cloudy. It is likely that a smaller
regional operator will provide rail service or the rail right-of-way may be
abandoned altogether.
i
i
'

The proposed industrial park has the potential for rail service via a spur
from the main line, which is located approximately 1,000 feet to the east of
the park. The City owns the property between the industrial park and the
rail line. It is likely, however, that future industrial tenants will rely on
surface transportation of goods rather than rail service.
Vehicular access to the site is potentially very good. The site directly abuts
M-19, a major north-south State highway. M-19 has an interchange
connection with 1-69 approximately 10 miles to the south. 1-69 connects the
Yale market with Port Huron, Canada, Flint and Lansing. An internal road
within the site, a direct connection to M-19, and appropriate deceleration
and passing lanes are needed to "connect" the site with this regional
transportation network.
According to a 1984 engineering study prepared for the City by K. Don
Williamson &amp; Associates, Inc., water and sewer improvements are necessary
to serve the site. The primary sewer limitation is the overall capacity of the
two public sewer lagoons. The City is currently working to solve the Citywide capacity problem.

l

The water problem is related more to distnbution limitations. According to
the study, a new 10 inch north-south transmission main must be connected
to the existing 10 inch main on North Street. The new 10 inch main would
provide adequate pressure to serve the normal demand of industrial users.
It would also benefit the entire southeast quadrant of the City. If a high
water demanding industry ( above 300 gpm demand) locates in the park, it
may be necessary to drill a separate well within the park.
Other facilities and services such as police, fire, rescue, gas, and electric are
generally available. Adjustment in service levels may be needed depending
on the tenants.
The additional industrial area directly south of the proposed park is a logical
expansion area for industry. This land, currently located in Brockway
Township, is bordered by commercial, future industrial, sewer lagoons, and
future recreation uses.

l

I.

77

r
---

- - - - -- - -

�M-19/RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY INDUSTRIAL AREA

The Hughes Industries site comprises the balance of industrial land. The
Hughes Industries site has room for expansion to the west. Future
development of this site should be limited to industry operating indoors that
can be developed in a manner that is sensitive to the adjacent residential and
senior citizen center uses.
The two industrial development areas described above should provide
adequate land area to serve the industrial needs -of the City of Yale over the
next 20 years. The primary location is well situated away from residential
uses and sensitive environmental features. Existing industry in planned nonindustrial areas should be encouraged to relocate to the City industrial park
so redevelopment consistent with the Land Use Plan can occur.
Development in the secondary industrial area is situated between the
northern edge of the CBD and residential development. Future development
in this area should be of a lower intensity than what might be found in the
industrial park.
CONCLUSION

This chapter descnbes some of the goals, problems, and opportunities
associated with commercial and industrial development. Its sets a direction
for specific improvements to solve existing problems and it provides the
blueprint for position economic development that will provide jobs, increase
the City's tax base, and be sensitive to residential areas.

r

As part of the implementation of this plan, it is important that the site plan
review standards in the Zoning Ordinance provide for adequate buffers
between residential and non-residential areas and sensitive design guidelines
so that a healthy economic base does not detract from the strong residential
neighborhoods. Code enforcement is also important. Many of the problem
areas noted can be solved by developing strong City codes and enforcing
them. Negative impacts like outdoor storage of garbage in piles and
overgrown vegetation should not be a part of the future of the City. Strong
code enforcement will insure that quality development maintains its quality
years after initial construction.

I

!' .
78

r
\

t

�LAND USE PLAN

INTRODUCTION

The Land Use Plan for the City of Yale descnbes, in a generalized manner,
those areas considered most appropriate for agriculture, residential,
commercial, industrial, public/quasi public, and recreation uses. The
distribution of the various land uses is based upon natural features, existing
land uses, road patterns, existing and proposed utility systems, and areas
most likely to develop over the next 15 to 20 years. All of these were
carefully correlated with the Planning Commission's Goals and Objectives as
stated in the Goals chapter.
The overriding goal of the Land Use Plan for the City of Yale is the
provision of sufficient land areas to accommodate future growth within an
orderly framework that makes economical provision of public services
possible. The need for guiding future land use development in the City
becomes apparent when several factors are considered. First, a portion of
the City's land area is still rural, characterized by scattered homesites without
public utility services. Second, increasing pressures for new development will
continue due to the City of Yale's proximity and transportation access to the
metropolitan Detroit, Flint, and Port Huron areas. Finally, the existing
downtown core is a major community resource and the industrial areas boost
the tax base and provide jobs. These areas must, however, co-exist with the
City's neighborhoods in a way that minimizes potential negative impacts.

!

l_

If development is allowed to take place in a haphazard manner, the
provision of municipal services becomes costly, prime open space may be lost
to premature urbanization, and an inappropriate mix of new uses may occur.
By grouping similar uses within a given area, property values can be more
easily maintained since incompatible land uses are avoided, and public
utilities can be programmed to serve only those areas where development is
likely and capable of paying the cost of such improvements.

IDENTIFYING NEEDS

ri
'·

r

A key component to any future land use plan is identifying the need for
various types of land uses. This is done by analyzing a wide variety of data
including population projections, the commercial market, future industrial
79

rI

�\.

potential, and future office potential. Once general needs are established
based on standard planning methodologies, the unique characteristics of the
community must be factored into the analysis. These characteristics include
existing development patterns, natµral features and goals and objectives
established through the master plan process. The ultimate product is a plan
tailored to the individual community that is realistic, based on factual data,
reflective of unique features of the land, and responsive to the potential for
various types of non-residential land uses that may be necessary to
adequately serve and employ area residents.
COI\fMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

,.

l-

r
\

l.
,..
I·

I

I

Regardless of the character of a community, adequate commercial
development is an important component for residents, employees working in
the community, and visitors from outside the municipal limits. Supermarkets
and drug stores provide the most basic necessities for everyday life, while
larger community and regional shopping centers provide a variety of durable
goods ranging from clothes to major appliances. Retail stores improve
quality of life, provide basic and not-so-basic goods and services, and they
employ area residents.
ff the commercial development is unplanned, it can actually detract from the
quality of life. Examples include unlimited "strip" or linear development
along .major roads which brings traffic congestion, unsightly buildings and
signs, and marginal businesses to the community.
An unplanned,
overextended retail area can leave a community with vacant stores that are
a blight, health hazard, and general nuisance to residents.

One of the goals of a master plan is to provide the amount of retail space
necessary to adequately serve the community in locations that are best able
to accommodate the traffic and noise associated with commercial
development. This section briefly identifies the anticipated retail demand
and potential locations in the City.
It is important to note that there are three major shopping center
classifications: neighborhood, community, and regional. The table below
shows the different characteristics of each one.

r.
80

r

�Characteristics of Shopping Centers
Leading
1\pe

i.

Tenant

Typical GLA

General Range

Mininm1

(Square Ft.)

(Square Ft.)

Site
(Acres)

50,000

30,000-100,000

3-10

Neighborhood

Supermarket

Community

Jr. Department 150,000
or Discount

100,000-300,000

10-30

Regional

One or More
Full Line
DepL Store

300,000-900,000
500,000-1,500,000*

10-60
15-lCD er
more•

400,000

800,ooo•

• Super Regional Shopping Center
Source: Shopping Center Development Handbook, 2nd edition, Urban Land Institute

Neighborhood Shopping

r
(

.

l
-:
'
r·
I
I

'

f
I

L.

As noted in the table above, neighborhood shopping centers are the smallest
shopping center type. They are intended to serve the daily needs of nearby
residents by providing basic goods and services such as groceries, drugs,
hardware, laundry cleaning, banking, etc. The minimum support population
recommended by the Urban Land Institute is 3,000 - 4,000 people, most of
which should live within a five - to 10 minute drive.

The neighborhood shopping center trade area includes the entire City and
portions of surrounding townships. Given the rural characteristics of the
surrounding area, maximum driving tiines may actually exceed 15 minutes.
The City of Yale currently offers a wide variety of neighborhood convenience
stores within its downtown core. As shown in the table below, with a
population of approximately 1,900, a per capita income level of
approximately $9,600 and a median annual sales figure of $167.56 per square
foot for neighborhood shopping centers (Urban Land Institute), the City's
population can only support about 18,000 square feet of neighborhood
shopping space, which is less than the typical supermarket (23,000 square
feet).

81

�City of Yale
Annual Retail Expenditures
(Based on City Population Only)

Total Year
1990 Income
$18.3 million

2

3

4

•

Forecast Retail
Elij&gt;enditures
1

$10 million

2

Forecast
Convenience
Elij&gt;enditures
$3.3 million

3

Forecast Convenience
Expenditures in
Neighborhood Centers
$3 million

4

S 9,614 x 1,900 people
55 percent of total income can be expected to be spent on retail purchases.•
33 percent of total retail expenditures can be expected to be spent in convenience
goods stores such as food and drug stores.•
Birchler/Arroyo Associates estimates that 90 percent of total convenience items
purchases made by City of Yale residents take place within the City limits.
Source: Analyzing Neighborhood Retail Opportunities, PAS Report #358,
published by the American Planning Association.

Because there are currently a wide variety of neighborhood shopping-type
tenants (drug store, food store, etc.) and a grocery store in the City, it is
clear that the downtown core draws from a large area outside the City limits.
In addition to the above convenience expenditures, 40 percent of retail
purchases are made in "shoppers goods stores". Shoppers goods are items
such as clothing and furniture for which people tend to comparison shop.
It is likely that a majority of the $4 million in purchases by Yale residents
on shoppers goods is occuring outside the City at places' like Birchwood Mall
and the Port Huron area.

Given the fairly modest increases in future population expected in the City,
it is likely that the convenience businesses within the City will continue at
about the same level as they are now. As has happened in the past, new
small shopping centers may be built outside the downtown core in Brockway
Township drawing City tenants away. This presents a number of challenges
to the City including finding new tenants or coping with the impact of vacant
commercial structures. It can also negatively impact the City's tax base.

If the City chooses to expand its boundaries into the complete four-section
area shown on the land use map, this would help capture an area with
existing businesses while also providing more vacant land for other types of
development. The population growth from this type of annexation would,
however, be limited by the City's ability to provide municipal utilities and
because of the rural development pattern currently in place.
82

'

�Community and Regional Shopping
Based on the data presented above, there does not appear to be a market
for a regional shopping center. However, the City currently serves as a
community shopping center for the surrounding area providing a junior
department store, furniture store, and other types of durable goods often
associated with community shopping centers. Traditionally, community
shopping centers draw upon a population of at least 40,000 people within a
20-minute drive. Yale's market is smaller and more reflective of a rural
resource center.
As with the neighborhood shopping category, the demand for additional
community-level shopping space is not going to increase much unless there
is some unforseen growth in population. The opening of Birchwood Mall in
Fort Gratiot Township may have a slight negative impact on the communitylevel shops in town. But is important to note that Birchwood is a regional
mall designed to attract patrons from a large area. Patrons will not likely
travel the long distances to the mall on a regular basis for goods that can be
found closer to home at similar prices. The advantage to the regional mall
is a variety of goods and comparison shopping. Community shopping and
regional shopping can co-exist because their markets are different.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

The demand for industrial development is related to many factors including
materials, labor, transportation, energy, and public policy. Industrial
developers look for the availability of utilities, affordable housing for the
work force, suitable characteristics of land, and good transportation access.
(

i
l

\ .

There are several ways of forecasting future industrial needs for an area.
One of the most common methods is based on total population. According
to Urban Planning and Design Criteria, the typical gross land requirement
for all industry is 12 acres per 1,000 population. Based on a forecast
population of 2,500 in the Year 2010, 30 acres of industrial land are
required.
Another method of forecasting demand is based on land area instead of
population. Industrial land typically consumes 5-10 percent of the total land
area of the community. This is a general range based on both urban and
rural communities. Rural communities often have only 2-5 percent of total
land area in industrial uses. Five percent of the approximate 840 acres in
City of Yale is 42 acres of industrial land; two percent is 17 acres.
83

�The two methods discussed above yield fairly similar results, with the one
method falling between the range of the second method. As a comparison,
approximately 20-25 acres of industrial land is currently in use in the City.
r
'

The table below shows typical employment densities for various land use
categories.
Light industry, which is a common form of industrial
development in rural areas has a density ratio of 624 square feet per
employee. Warehousing has a much higher ratio of 2,746 square feet per
employee.
Employment Density By Category

Mean number
of square ft.
per employee
Light Industrial
Research &amp; Development
Warehouse
Industrial Service
Office•

624
485
2,746
724
202

Employees Per
1.000 square feet
1.61

2.06
0.36
1.38
4.95

Source:

Employment and Parking in Suburban Business Parks: A Pilot
Study. published by the Urban Land Institute.

•source:

Office Development Handbook. published by the Urban Land
Institute

Assuming a 30 percent lot coverage by a light industrial development, 42
acres (five percent of total) would yield 550,000 square feet of space
requiring 540 employees, and 17 acres (two percent of total) would yield
220,000 square feet and 218 employees. This assumes 50 percent light
industrial and 50 percent warehousing.

'-

As noted above, 30 acres of industrial land are required if the per capita
methodology is used. This seems fairly reasonable given the characteristics
of City of Yale, however, it is important to note other factors that may
influence the future development of industrial land. First, City of Yale has
limited freeway access. Although M-19 is a State highway, there is no
freeway access within or directly adjacent to the City. Second, limited
industrial development can be an excellent way to increase the City's and
school district's tax base. Residential development can hinder a community's
84

�ability to provide services if it is not supplemented with some commercial or
industrial development.
The information provided above is intended to provide some analysis of
industrial potential. However, the ultimate decision must reflect the goals
and objectives of the community. Attracting industrial development in
limited areas with adequate zoning and site plan standards to ensure
compatibility with the rural atmosphere of the City is desirable. Finally, the
City will probably provide a level of industrial activity above what is needed
for City residents because of its function as a community resource center.

OFFICE DEVELOPMENT
There are two basic types of office buildings: single-tenant and multi-tenant.
Single tenant buildings can be located in almost any location satisfactory to
the tenant. For example, a small corporation in Port Huron may decide it
prefers a location away from the City and chooses a rural area site. Market
factors may play a very small role in this type of development. Good
transportation access is probably the key factor in such a move.
Multi-tenant office buildings built on the speculation that tenants will be
found are much more tied to market factors. Developers will look at access,
proximity to professional and clerical labor, parking, transit opportunities,
hotel amenities, legal and accounting services, banking, and the "image" of
an area. It is unlikely that a rural area would satisfy the market
requirements for anything more than small offices serving a local market (eg.,
attorney, doctor, accountant, architect, etc.).

I

l-

Given the fact that only 38 percent of the total 725-person work force in
City of Yale is employed in professional, sales, and administrative support
jobs, it is not likely that substantial office development will occur. Many of
the 275 office workers living in the City will have to continue to travel to
more urban locations for office jobs.
It is unlikely that the City will be able to attract substantial office
development. Larger communities like Port Huron will be the likely source
of any major office growth in the next 10 to 15 years. City of Yale should,
however, continue to provide areas for local offices like medical, legal and
accounting.

r
t

85

�RESIDENTIAL

The preliminary estimates from the 1990 U.S Census of Housing and
Population show 1,898 persons and 781 housing units, or 2.4 persons per unit
(based on total units) The density is low, reflecting the aging of the
population and the lower birth rates. If the average household size continues
at 2.4 persons per unit (ppu) in 2010 and the population forecast of 2,500
people is correct, 260 ~ housing units will be needed by 2010, or 13 per
year. If the average household size drops to a 2.2 ppu, 355 ~ units will
be needed by 2010, or 18 units per year.

r

!

As the City continues to grow in population, it is expected that marginal and

vacant agricultural land will be consumed by new housing units. If the real
estate market accelerates beyond what is expected, the City may find
residential development consuming more and more agricultural land. The
question is: How can development be managed to best reflect the goals and
objectives of the City?

r
I

The issue of affordable housing for all Oty residents is also important.
Many young people who grow up in a community often find they cannot
afford·the stay there because of the high cost of buying a single family home.
Older Americans are also in need of alternative housing arrangements,
particularly as the elderly population booms. In the year 2010, the post war
baby boomers will begin to reach 65 years of age.
One way of addressing the problem is through two-family dwellings or the
provisions of two units on one lot. Accessory apartments built into a single
family home and "granny flats", which are temporary efficiency units, are
examples of ways to place more than one unit on a lot. This would allow
a family to place an elderly parent or grandparent of young family on their
lot at a lower cost than a separate off-site dwelling. Accessory apartments
and traditional two-family dwellings (duplexes) can be designed to look like
single family homes, and they do nothing to distract from the rural character
of the area.

r

r

Multi-family and mobile home parks are other types of dwellings that can
serve a need in the community. Unlike single and two-family dwellings, they
are typically placed in separate districts to minimize the impacts on singlefamily and agricultural uses.

I.L.
(

I

.

86

�LAND USE PLAN

r

I

This section identifies the appropriate locations for various types of land uses
in City of Yale. It is based on all of the data collected and analyzed as part
of this Master Plan document. The main focus is to be consistent with the
Goals and Objectives established as part of the Master Plan process. The
Land Use Plan also focuses on two "different" land areas. The current City
boundaries make up one area and the four square mile area on the Land
Use Map comprises the second. The color map represents the official city
Land Use Map; in case of any discrepancies between the two, the color map
shall take precedence. The Planning Commission has chosen to exercise its
statutory authority to plan beyond its current boundaries, recognizing that
this larger area may become part of the City in the next 20 years.
AGRICULTURE/ RURAL RESIDENTIAL

Within the current City area, agricultural uses can be found near the outer
boundaries of the City. In most instances, these areas will likely continue as
agriculture until water and sewer is extended and the residential housing
market improves.
From a long-range planning perspective, it does not seem feasible that these
agricultural areas will or should be a part of the City's future. With the
exception of the extreme southeast comer of the City, the current
agricultural areas are prime locations for new subdivisions.

r
I

Within the larger 4-square mile area, agriculture is a more dominant land
use and will probably continue to play some role away from the urban core.
It will likely blend with large lot residential development into areas that can
be categorized as agriculture/rural residential. These areas are the least
likely to see municipal water and sewer, making compact urban development
undesirable and infeasible. Densities in this Agriculture/Rural Residential
area should be equivalent to five-acre lots, which is similar to the densities
called for in Brockway Township's Master Plan.
URBAN RESIDENTIAL

[_

r.
f.

The majority of existing residential lots and those areas most likely to be
served by water and sewer in the next 20 years comprise the urban
residential land use category. Minimum lot sizes between one-quarter and
one-fifth of an acre are appropriate in this classification. It should be noted
that lot sizes should be at least two acres if development occurs prior to
water and sewer service.
87

�RECREATION
The recreation uses shown on the Land Use Map include existing city park
property north and south of Park Avenue, a new large recreation area in the
southeast quadrant of town, and a large tract with woodlands and wetlands
west of the current city limits. Although not shown on the plan, there are
two target areas for new neighborhood parks east of Main Street (M-19),
north and south of North Street.
As noted in the Community Facilities Chapter, the existing City park

provides an excellent community-level resource meeting most park standards,
however, the residential areas east of Main Street are in need of one or two
smaller neighborhood parks within walking distance of the homes. One
north of North Street and one south would be ideal.
The large area near the southeast comer of the present municipal boundary
is currently owned by the City. Its location includes two primary features:
1) sewer lagoons to the west and 2) railroad frontage to the southwest. The
sewer lagoons limit the market potential for residential development. The
rail right-of-way, which is currently inactive and could possibly become public
property at some later date, provides a possibility for a rails-to-trail
conversion. A bike path within this right-of-way would connect the
recreational use with the central City without vehicular conflicts.
Given the size of the parcel, a mix of uses would be appropriate.
Possibilities include the following:
■
■

l
.,[
l

l. :

■
■

playground
cross country trails
softball fields
mountain bike trails

■
■

■
■

agricultural education center
miniature golf
indoor ice rink
camping

The actual development of this parcel should be dictated by a more detailed
recreation plan to be done after the Master Plan program. A recreation
committee working in conjunction with the Planning Commission could best
determine needs.

PUBLIC / QUASI-PUBLIC
Numerous uses are found in this category including the Yale Public School
complex, the hospital complex, several churches, the sewage lagoon area,
electric substation, public parking, and municipal services. The map area
88

�provides for an expanded sewage lagoon complex, given the current need for
additional capacity, and it includes a large parcel to the southeast of the
lagoons that could be used for a variety of purposes. A future recycling
center/compost operation is one possibility. Outside the current City limits,
the cemetery on Park Avenue (Yale Road) is prominent.
It is also recognized that additional public and quasi-public sites will likely
develop over the next 20 years. Because of their unique locational
characteristics and the fact that many consume small parcels of land, they
cannot be shown on the Land Use Map. Local zoning and site plan review
standards should be sufficient to regulate these uses as they are proposed.
COMMERCIAL

Two major commercial areas are shown on the Land Use Plan Map. For
a description, see the Commercial and Industrial Areas Plan.
INDUSTRIAL

Two primary industrial areas are designated on the Land Use Map. The
Commercial and Industrial Areas Plan provides additional background and
descriptions of the two industrial areas.

!.

CONCLUSION

The Land Use Plan Map was drafted to reflect the goals and objectives of
the City of Yale Planning Commission. It provides for a balance of housing
types, commercial development to meet the needs of the population,
recreation development of both local and regional significance, and limited,
low intensity industrial development consistent with the rural character of the
City.

I.

I

I-

89

------

�Urban Residential

---

Mobile Home Park
Multi-Family Residential
Downtown District
Industrial
Recreation
Public/Quasi-Public

Official

LAND USE PLAN
CfIT OF YALE PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. CLAIR COUN1Y, MICIDGAN
FEET
400

//1.
B/'"'-

ID)

BIR CHLER / ARROYO

"ssocv.m

20J()

�AR
UR
MH
MF
REC

AR

Agricultural/Rural
Urban Residential
Mobile Home Park
Multi-Family Residential
Recreation
Public/Quasi-Public
Downtown District
General Business
Industrial

p

AR

DD
GB

I
UR

R

_L~AR

REC
AR

p
AR

Illustrative

LAND USE PLAN
City of Yale and Surrounding Area

CllY OF YALE PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. CLAIR COUNTY, MICHIGAN
FEET

"''

7

B /'A
//

""'

BIRCHLER /ARROYO

A.SSOCIAH5

�IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES &amp; OPPORTUNITIES

INTRODUCTION

A Comprehensive Plan cannot implement itself and if it is left to collect dust
on a shelf it is hardly worth the commission's considerable effort to
formulate a future development strategy. Fortunately, a community like Yale
has many implementation tools and techniques available to it. These range
from enforcement of existing codes, to development of new ordinances, to
relocation programs for incompatible uses, to state and federal grants to
assist in developing new facilities. A number of specific strategies are
discussed below, along with a partial listing of proposals from the
Comprehensive Plan chapters that could be addressed by those strategies.

ZONING ORDINANCE

A city zoning ordinance is not meant to be a static document. The
experiences communities undergo in the application of their zoning rules and
the review of unusual new land uses constantly change the body of
professional knowledge related to planning and zoning standards. Periodic
review of the zoning ordinance will result in the application of the most upto-date standards in the design of new uses and the maintenance of existing
developments. Zoning Ordinance standards could be effective in addressing
the following:
■

Proper screening of industrial service/storage areas

■

Adequate parking for non-residential uses

■

Performance standards for external impacts of business uses

■

Proper building setbacks from streets and neighboring uses

■

Uniform landscape and screen wall standards

■

Hazardous materials standards

■

New site planning standards for access management

92

�\

In addition to the above, changes to the Zoning Map itself will be necessary.
Among the changes necessary to implement the plan are the following:
■

Evaluate the Zoning Map to determine which areas of the City should
be rezoned now .to reflect the recommendations in the Comprehensive
Plan. The most important areas for change are those where a more
intense zoning now exists than what is envisioned in the future. The
City will be updating its Zoning Ordinance immediately following the
Comprehensive Plan Program.

■

Carefully study existing zoning classifications in the downtown district.
Based on the focus of the new downtown district, it may be
appropriate to have more than one zoning classification in this area:
one concentrating on the importance of a mix of uses and another
more commercially-oriented.

CODE ENFORCEMENT

Simple code enforcement can often turn the tide with regard to the image
of an area and the liveability of a neighborhood. More aggressive but fair
enforcement of current codes and ordinances could be effective in the
following instances:
■

Eliminate negative influences in residential areas

■

Improve housing conditions

■

Terminate improperly established, non-conforming uses

■

Repair or replace ineffective greenbelts, screen walls

■

Reduce business sign area to maximum permitted by ordinance

■

Prohibit expansion where it overtaxes support facilities

I ..

,·

SPECIAL PLANS AND STUDIES

!

r

I

'.

Frequently a general master plan must be followed by detailed design and
implementation studies in order to illustrate specific concepts that can only
be covered briefly in the plan. Corridor design plans, business district facade
studies, sign control and improvement plans, market studies, and pedestrian
facilities plans are a few examples of the types of detailed follow-up work
that is needed. Special plans could be used to address the following:
93

�■

Parking facilities improvement plans to address deficiencies

■

Building facade studies to enhance older business areas

■

Corridor design plans to integrate land use, circulation, parking,
landscaping and pedestrian improvements

■

Sign design guidelines and sign control ordinances to improve
sign conditions in business districts

■

Market studies to help improve retail and office uses

RECREATION PLANS &amp; GRANTS

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources administers three major
grant programs for recreation site acquisition and development. One Federal
program (Land &amp; Water Conservation Fund) and two State programs
(Natural Resources Trust Fund and the Michigan Recreation Bond Fund)
provide grant funds to local communities for both acquisition and
development with 25% to 50% local matching funds required. All three
programs require that the City prepare an MDNR-approved Recreation Plan
to insure eligibility. These funds can be used for:
■

New park site acquisition and development, particularly the two
desired neighborhood parks east of Main Street

■

New development on existing sites

■

Joint development on school district sites

r

'

I

~

BUSINESS RELOCATION PROGRAMS

I

f

i
'·.

In the area of business relocation, the City plays the primary role as
middleman or facilitator. Through careful inventory of available properties
and close contact with business owners and landowners/landlords, the City
could help existing business and industry locate new space more appropriate
to their particular use. This type of program might:
■

Move appropriate industry away from neighborhoods

■

Find local businesses room for needed expansion
94

r

�■

Improve the business mix in retail areas

■

Bring targeted businesses to Yale

■

Implement the proposals of the Commercial &amp; Industrial Areas
Plan

COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS

A number of activities can be undertaken to improve the City's retail/office
areas, lower vacancies, encourage a better mix of goods and services, and
precipitate upgrading of buildings and their surroundings. One tool
becoming more popular is the creation of a downtown development authority
(DDA). The DDA has authority to plan for physical improvements, establish
programs for business retention and new business recruitment, and actually
accomplish improvements through bonding authority made possible by tax
increment financing. The experience of successful DDA's suggests that the
improvements within the business areas have a "spill-over" effect that also
results in raising consciousness and values in nearby residential
neighborhoods.
Commercial improvement programs could be used to address:
■

Developing a unique character for business districts in Yale

■

Improving the mix of businesses and quality of shopping
opportunities for city residents

■

Correcting code violations related to inadequate screening of
business uses

■

Implementing new sign design guidelines through incentive
programs and sign design assistance

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMMING

I,

The Municipal Planning Act states that "for the purpose of furthering the
desirable future development of the municipality under the master plan, the
city planning commission, after the commission shall have adopted a master
plan, shall prepare coordinated and comprehensive programs of public
structures and improvements. The commission shall annually prepare such
95

r .

'
l.

�a program for the ensuing 6 years..." Hence, there is a specific State
mandate for a Capital Improvements Program (CIP) as an implementation
tool for the Comprehensive Plan.
Capital Improvements, by definition, are large-scale projects and equipment
typically exceeding $5,000 in cost and having a life of five or more years.
New public buildings, streets, parks, police cars, etc. are included in Capital
Improvements Programming.
The CIP typically includes as a major component the development of a
"needs list". Looking over a six year horizon, capital needs are anticipated
and ranked by priority and proposed year of acquisition. These needs and
associated costs are then related to the fiscal capacity of the municipality to
determine if funding will be available given anticipated revenues. New
funding sources may be identified and pursued as part of the CIP process.
It is clear that the annual update of the CIP is an important component of
the process because of changing costs, technology, and revenues. It also
forces the municipality to continually re-think priorities over a medium-range
time horizon. The municipality must go beyond next year's budget in an
attempt to inject planning into a traditional short-term budgetary process.
The end result of the CIP process is a policy document, adopted by the
Planning Commission, that relates the long-range goals of the Comprehensive
Plan to a medium-range program. This program can then guide year-toyear budgeting. It also brings together the planning commission, city council,
and city administration in an attempt to continually relate long-term goals to
short-term actions, which is the ultimate goal of the Comprehensive Plan
Process.
The CIP process could be used to provide funding for:
■

Improvements to facilitate business relocation

■

Recreation site acquisition and development

■

Business facade and sign improvement incentive programs

■

Major construction of satellite service centers (police, fire,
hbrary, senior citizens, and the like)

■

Parking and street improvements

�STRATEGIC PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION
Through the State's Rural Economic Development Program, the City has
qualified for funds to prepare a Strategic Economic Development Plan.
Once approved, the City can apply for federal and state dollars to encourage
economic development. Examples might include extending the City's water
service to the industrial park, providing relocation assistance to businesses
now in residential areas, or building an industrial service road. Many of the
items listed above under business relocation and commercial improvement
may be funded through these dollars. The City should continue its efforts
to secure this type of assistance.

CONCLUSION
The above comments and ideas highlight the importance of continued
implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. It is obvious that the City will
not be able to tackle all these items within the next two or three years due
to budget and staff limitations. However, one goal of the planning process
should be to prioritize these items so that a systematic program of
implementation can be followed.

'

.

t
97

1•

i

�APPENDIX

1.

Newspaper Notice of Public Hearing

2.

Resolution of Adoption

3,

Commercial and Industrial Impact Areas

4.

Summary of Public Comments - Futuring Session

5.

Letter of Transmittal to City Council

6.

Letter of Transmittal to County Register of Deeds

7.

Letter of Transmittal to St Clair County Planning
Commission

8.

Letter of Transmittal to SEMCOG

9.

Letter of Transmittal to Brockway Township

r

_I

98

r

\_,

�RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION
CI1Y OF YALE COMPREHENSIIVE PLAN
By the City of Yale Planning Commission

Thursday, March 21, 1991
WHEREAS, the City of Yale Planning Commission is empowered, by the Municipal
Planning Act No. 285 of 1931, to make a master plan for the physical development of the
City and to amend the plan as needed from time-to-time, and
WHEREAS, the Yale City Council created the Planning Commission for the purposes
stated in the Municipal Planning Act No. 285 of 1931, as amended, and
WHEREAS, the City of Yale Planning Commission has been directed by the Yale City
Council to prepare a master plan, hereafter referred to as the Comprehensive Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City of Yale City Council and Planning Commission have retained
professional assistance and technical support in the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan
that addresses the needs and desires of the City's residents, and
·
WHEREAS, public input into the comprehensive planning process was actively solicited
by means of a community attitude survey, a futuring session that involved community
leaders and interested citizens, multiple articles in the Yale Expositor, and by a public
hearing on the draft Comprehensive Plan held on March 21, 1991, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposals in the Comprehensive Plan
address the needs of the community's current and expected future population,
NOW 11-IEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Yale Planning Commission
hereby adopts this Comprehensive Plan for the City of Yale, along with the text, maps,
charts, graphs and other descriptive materials included in the document, and
BE IT FURTI-IER ORDERED, that an attested copy of the Comprehensive Plan shall be
certified to the Yale City Council and the St. Clair County Register of Deeds; and courtesy
copies be sent to the St. Clair County Planning Commission, Brockway Township, and the
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.
Motion by:

Wolf

Long

Supported by:

Ayes: Anderson, Fuller, Wolf, Cronin,
Thorner, Long, and Trevino
Absent:
Kovatch and Graves

Nays: None

Motion carried 7-0
We hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution
adopted by the City of )'ale Planning Commission at a meeting held March 21, 1991.

~t.~

_;;.~~~~---..\::~z-2::o-....,.,-

(

~

\

~

�Page 6 -Thursday . FEBRUARY 28 . 1991 -THE YALE EXPOSITOR

NOTICE
of Public Hearing
City of Yale Planning Commission
Proposed Comprehensive Plan
Notice Is hereby given that the City of Yale
Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing regarding Its proposed new Com•
prehensive Plan for the City of Yale, on Thur•
sday, March 21, 1991, beginning at 7:00 p.m. at
City Hall, 111 West Mechanic Street, Yale, Ml
48097. The Proposed Comprehensive Plan,
which is being prepared as a master plan pur•
suant to the Municipal Planning Act No. 285 of
1931, as amended, is NOT a Zoning Ordinance
but Is a long-range policy document Involving
Land Use; Thoroughfares; and Commercial &amp;
Industrial Areas elements and includes maps,
tables, charts , and descriptive text that explain
the Commission's proposals for the future
development and redevelopment of the City.
Immediately following the public hearing, the
Planning Commission will hold a meeting to
consider formal adoption of the plan.
Interested individuals may make comments
in person or by a representative at the public
hearing. Comments may be submitted In
writing to the City of Yale Planning Com•
mission, 111 West Mechanic Street, Yale, Ml
48097. The descriptive text and the proposed
Land Use and other Plan maps may be
examined at the City Hall during regular
business hours, Mondays through Fridays ex•
cept holidays, prior to the hearing .
This notice is published pursuant to the
requirements of Michigan Public Act 285 of
1931, as amended .

Fred Fuller, Secretary
Yale Planning Commission

�Page 6-Thursday, FEBRUARY 28. 1991 -THE YALE EXPOS1TOR

NOTICE
of Public Hearing
City of Yale Planning Commission
Proposed Comprehensive Plan
Notice is hereby given that the City of Yale
Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing regarding its proposed new Comprehensive Plan for the City of Yale, on Thursday, March 21, 1991, beginning at 7:00 p.m. at
City Hall, 111 West Mechanic Street, Yale, Ml
48097. The Proposed Comprehensive Plan,
which is being prepared as a master plan pursuant to the Municipal Planning Act No. 285 of
1931, as amended, is NOT a Zoning Ordinance
but is a long-range policy document involving
Land Use; Thoroughfares; and Commercial &amp;
Industrial Areas elements and includes maps,
tables, charts, and descriptive text that explain
the Commission's proposals for the future
development and redevelopment of the City.
Immediately following the public hearing, the
Planning Commission will hold a meeting to
consider formal adoption of the plan.
Interested individuals may make comments
in person or by a representative at the public
hearing. Comments may be submitted in
writing to the City of Yale Planning Commission, 111 West Mechanic Street, Yale, Ml
48097. The descriptive text and the proposed
Land Use and other Plan maps may be
examined at the City Hall during regular
business hours, Mondays through Fridays except holidays, prior to the hearing.
This notice is published pursuant to the
requirements of Michigan Public Act 285 of
1931, as amended.

Fred Fuller, Secretary
Yale Planning Commission

�RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION
CITY OF YALE COMPREIIENSIIVE PLAN
By the City of Yale Planning Commission

Thursday, March 21, 1991
WHEREAS, the City of Yale Planning Commissio~ is empowered, by the Municipal
Planning Act No. 285 of 1931, to make a master plan for the physical development of the
City and to amend the plan as needed from time-to-time, and
WHEREAS, the Yale City Council created the Planning Commission for the purposes
stated in the Municipal Planning Act No. 285 of 1931, as amended, ~d
WHEREAS, the City of Yale Planning Commission has been directed by the Yale City
Council to prepare a master plan, hereafter referred to as the Comprehensive Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City of Yale City Council and Planning Commission have retained
professional assistance and technical support in the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan
that addresses the needs and desires of the City's residents, and
WHEREAS, public input into the comprehensive planning process was actively solicited
by means of a community attitude survey, a futuring session that involved community
leaders and interested citizens, multiple articles in the Yale Expositor, and by a public
hearing on the draft Comprehensive Plan held on March 21, 1991, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposals in the Comprehensive Plan
address the needs of the community's current and expected future population,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Yale Planning Commission
hereby adopts this Comprehensive Plan for the City of Yale, along with the text, maps,
charts, graphs and other descriptive materials included in the document, and
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED, that an attested copy of the Comprehensive Plan shall be
certified to the Yale City Council and the St. Clair County Register of Deeds; and courtesy
copies be sent to the St. Clair County Planning Commission, Brockway Township, and the
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.
Motion by:

Wolf

Supported by:

Ayes: Anderson, Fuller, Wolf, Cronin,
Thorner, Long, and Trevino
Absent:
Kovatch and Graves

Long

Nays: None

Motion carried 7-0

We hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution
adopted by the City of Yale Planning Commission at a meeting held March 21, 1991.

II .

James

cro~

Cbauperson "

~t.t!!t:

�INDUSTRIAL / COMMERCIAL IMPACT AREAS

This section identifies and describes commercial and industrial impact areas
in the City of Yale. The comments below are organized on a block-by-block
basis for the major commercial and industrial areas. The intent of this
section is to provide general comments about 1) the need for facade or sign
improvements, 2) need for additional screening adjacent to residential areas,
3) areas where gravel parking should be paved, 4) areas where access control
or parking improvements are needed and 5) need for land use modifications.
Comments made refer to general problem areas; they are not intended to
address every negative impact.
#1: Jones/Main/Wood/Mechanic
1)

Service garage fronts on Wood Street facing residential. Future
redevelopment should orient business activities away from
residential.

2)

Open storage of barrels, tires, pipes, etc. behind Centennial
Tire service garage/fotal station facing residential. Proper
trash storage and screening from residential needed.

3)

Gravel parking south of Veterans Hall should be paved.

4)

Total gas station needs raised curb islands to better define
ingress and egress points. Patrons of the party store next door
are parking in the driveway area and on the public sidewalk.

#2: Jones/Main/Mechanic/Park Avenue

f

I

\ '

5)

Facade and sign improvements needed on entire west side of
commercial, particularly the strip facing public parking lot.
With 55 adjacent paved parking spaces, the west facade should
"invite" patrons in or direct them to front entrances.

6)

Furniture store using vacant lot west of alley for vehicle parking
and outdoor storage of boxes. Screening is needed.

#3: West of Main/North/Bettes
f

I

7)

No screening of C &amp; S Bank drive-thru and fabric store from
residential to the west. Problems include open storage of trash,
automobile noise and exhaust, and teller loud speakers.

�8)

"Free" parking lot north of bank is unpaved and appears to
lack a drainage system. Lot should be paved and raised
concrete islands should be provided at end of parking bays
abutting Bettes or Main Street to provide for adequate sight
distance.

#4: Bettes/West of Main
9)

Vacant lot used by Ford dealer for new car storage is not
screened from residential to the west. Cars are parked too
close to Bettes and the sidewalks along Main Street, which
hinders sight distance. If this is a permanent use, the lot
should be constructed with raised concrete islands along the
ends of all parking bays. Screening should be provided.

10)

Occupied mobile home behind Yale Feed Store is an
inappropriate use and structure in this area.

11)

Gravel parking area serving mobile home, Yale Feed Store,
Sassy's Pizza, and Big K Lanes is not maintained. Trash and
weeds surround lot. Lot should be cleaned up, paved, and
constructed with an adequate drainage system.

12)

Hughes Industries site has a combination of gravel and poorly
maintained asphalt surfaces in need of paving. High weeds and
outdoor storage of 55 gallon drums and wood pallets should be
eliminated. Screening of site from senior center and residences
to the north and west is needed.

#5: Second Street/ West of Main
13)

'.

Car wash and gas station directly abut residential without
screening. Patrons were observed drying vehicles west of car
wash structure, directly adjacent to residential.

#6: Morrell/Guy/ East of Main

f

/
I·

l
I
I
j

I

•

14)

No screening of A &amp; W drive-in from residential to the north.

15)

Old Moore &amp; Carter lumber site is not screened from
residential. Wood and scrap storage is in view of residential,
and gravel parking lot should be paved before a new tenant
moves in or redevelops the site.

�#7: Will/Rail Right-of-way/East of Main
16)
r.
I

Sidewalk is seriously deteriorated and landscaping needed
around grain elevator site.

#8: Will/Pine/Kennifick/Main
17)

Substation needs screening from Main Street motorists. A
landscaped buffer along east property line of Ford dealer would
help screen the site.

18)

Parking of vehicles for sale near the southeast comer of Will
and Main and the northwest comer of Pine and Main hinders
intersection sight distance. Parking bays/rows abutting public
streets should have raised concrete islands to improve sight
distance.

19)

Used car parking perpendicular to Main Street directly abuts
public sidewalk. This can distract from pedestrian level activity
along Main Street. A modest, 10-foot landscaped buffer would
provide some vehicle/pedestrian separation, improve sight
distance at comers, and provide some green space.

#9: Pine/North/Jyfain/Kennifick

,1

I

{

20)

The entire frontage along Main Street is characterized by
poorly defined driveways and curbing, poorly marked parking
areas, and a sidewalk that becomes poorly delineated in front
of the Olympic Flame Restaurant. Raised concrete curbs
should be installed to define limited driveway access on the
east side of the sidewalk and a raised landscaped strip should
be provided on the east side of the sidewalk. Driveways should
be clearly delineated and they should provide adequate turning
radii.

21)

Diagonal parking currently provided on the north side of North
Street, adjacent to the Olympic Flame, should be eliminated
because the space provided is of an inadequate length. Parallel
parking should be provided as an alternative.

#10: Mechanic/North/Jyfain/Kennifick
22)

The area used for perpendicular parking in front of the Auto
Value Store is too small; cars often back up onto Main Street
and across the sidewalk.

�#11: Wood/Mechanic&amp;,fain/Kennifick
23)

Rear (east) facades of commercial strip are poorly maintained.
Regardless of future development on the east half of this block,
rear facades should be improved. This entire area should be
buffered from adjacent residential. Ace Hardware parking and
storage already intrudes into residential area.

#12: Arthur/Guy/Oarence
24)

Industrial site appears to be poorly maintained with overgrown
brush/vegetation. Cyclone fencing is an unattractive buffer to
adjacent residences. Long-term goal is to relocate industry and
redevelop site as residential.

#13: Jean Street/Existing Junk Yard
25)

The existing junk/salvage area is inappropriate in an area with
residential uses. Landscaping would buffer the site on an
interim basis until developed as multi-family.

#14: East of Maty Street/South of Rail Right-of-way
26)

Existing industrial uses are located adjacent to residential
homes, and industrial traffic must use residential streets. Longterm goal is to relocate industry and develop site as residential.

#15: North/Rail Right-of-way/Kennefick/Arthur
27)

r
L
r

I
\

Ammonia tanks stored outside are located adjacent to
residential. Redevelopment of this entire area as part of the
central business district is the long-term goal.

�City Of Yale
"Vision Of The Future"
Summary Of comments From Participants

I.

General community Character

A.
B.

c.

D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
II.

Land Use Preferences

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.

o.
P.

Q.
II.

c.

!, -

D.

f

E.

l

(
f
I

Make subdivisions a high priority
Eventually remove agriculture within City limits
Expand downtown east and west
Develop light industry in Southeast corner of City
Provide quality multiple housing at appropriate locations
Maintain mobile homeparks - enough for now
Promote quality senior housing near CBD and park
Welcome Agribusiness in southeast corner
Develop 2-family units and accessory
Promote 2nd-floor offices downtown
Develop offices on outskirts of CBD
Develop Mill Creek Hiking Trail/Railroad Track
Develop neighborhood parks/tot lots
Provide more recreation programs for children
Provide more parking on east side of downtown
Consider establishing footbridge over Mill Creek to City
Park
Evaluate Rehab/reuse of junior high school

PUblic Services And Facilities
A.
B.

!

Expand housing in new subdivisions
Maintain downtown core
Add more manufacturing jobs/light industry
Expand City limits
Discourage welfare conversions
Keep young people
Attract food processors
Maintain residential use of historic homes
Maintain agricultural land until new development

F.
G.
H.

I.

Expand and improve water and sewer service
Maintain police services, establish better contacts with
youth
Consider Township/City consolidation fire services
Roads and sidewalks need major improvements - new
sidewalks and curbs are needed.
Schools are good but overcrowded - need more facilities
Storm drainage improvements needed
Ambulance service a plus - need an advanced EMS unit
Continue recycling program - add waste oil collection
More comprehensive recreation plans needed

�J.
K.
L.
M.
N.

o.

Hospital is a positive feature
More timely trash collection needed
Better use of park needed
Expand water system to industrial park - provide loops
Organize civil defense in case of ice storm
Promote neighborhood watch

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010628">
                <text>Yale_Comprehensive-Plan_1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010629">
                <text>City of Yale Planning Commission, City of Yale, St. Clair County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010630">
                <text>1991-03-21</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010631">
                <text>City of Yale Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010632">
                <text>The City of Yale Comprehensive Plan was prepared by the City of Yale Planning Commission with assistance from Birchler/Arroyo Associates and was adopted on March 21, 1991.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010633">
                <text>Birchler/Arroyo Associates (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010634">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010635">
                <text>Yale (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010636">
                <text>St. Clair County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010637">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010639">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010640">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010641">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1010642">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038473">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="40244" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="44022">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/350df80508244e467547853bb87c5e0f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>916a28b737b3d4a14b087d513b99cd51</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="765419">
                    <text>������������</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="36">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="761921">
                  <text>Incunabula</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765550">
                  <text>The term incunabula refers to books printed between 1450 and 1500, approximately the first fifty years following the invention, by Johann Gutenberg of Mainz, of printing from moveable type. Our collection includes over 200 volumes and numerous unbound leaves from books printed during this period.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765551">
                  <text>1450/1500</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765552">
                  <text>Incunabula Collection (DC-03)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765553">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United &lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765554">
                  <text>Incunabula</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765747">
                  <text>Printing 1450-1500</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765555">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765556">
                  <text>DC-03</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765557">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765558">
                  <text>text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="765559">
                  <text>eng&#13;
it&#13;
la&#13;
nl &#13;
de</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765405">
                <text>Speculum de honestate vitae. octo puncta perfectionis assequendae.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765406">
                <text>DC-03_A044Claravallensis1484ca</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765407">
                <text>Claravallensis, Bernardus</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765408">
                <text>Speculum de honestate vitae, octo puncta perfectionis assequendae, by Bernardus Claravallensis. Printed in Rome by Stephen Plannck circa 1485. Quarto. [ISTC ib00444000]</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765409">
                <text>Rome: Stephen Plannck</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765410">
                <text>Incunabula</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="765411">
                <text>Printing 1450-1500</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="765412">
                <text>Spiritual life--Christianity--Early works to 1800</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765413">
                <text>la</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765414">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765416">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765417">
                <text>1485</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="765418">
                <text>Seidman Rare Books Collection: BX2349.B47 S64 1485, A44</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="799408">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54644" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58915">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/161f3473ba1c265f51dfb0676ffe66c7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>163076574815b501097831be3188250c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1007439">
                    <text>CLARK TOWNSHIP

0

D

•
I

I

, 1

CLARK TOWNSJIIP
PUN.NI.NG &amp; ZONING
COMMISSION

�~------

CLARK TOWNSHIP PLANNING AND ZONIOO CCM'llSSION

(

CHAIRMAN:

, Robert Sherlund

SECRETARY:

Susie Rutledge

MEMBERS:

Fred Bryner
Ray Causley
Jim Hamel
Albert Lindberg
Clark O'Brien, Sr.
Elmer Polzin
Mary Scherer

THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT WAS A JOINT EFFORT BY
THE CLARK TOWNSHIP PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, THE
MACKINAC COUNTY BOA.RP AND THE EASTERN U.P. REGIONAL
-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION.

•

\

I

,ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, we wish to express our sincere appreciation
and thanks to the Mackinac County Board of Commissioners for
their cooperation and financial help to complete this plan.
We are also very much thankful to the Eastern U.P. Regional
Planning and Development Commission for all the technical assistance which made this useful work complete.

�----~~--

-

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction.
Overview of Township (Location, People, Economy)

... ... . •
• . . . ... •

Natural and Cultural Variables (Resource Inventory).

.. ........ . ..

3

• • 7

Development of Capability Criteria ••
Land Development Goals •

2

• • ,23

.

• • • • 27

Township Planning Concept ••

• .29

Basic Township Plan ••

•• 31

Transportation Plan.

• .36

Utilities Plan.

.37

Recreation Plan.

• • • • 39

Proposed Zoning Map ••

• .44

�.ENABLING LEG !Q!.,AT ION
TOWNSHIP PLANNING ACT (ACT NO. 168 OF PUBLIC ACTS OF 1959, AS AMENDED TIIROUGH
OCTOBER, 1966).

An act to provide for township planning 1 for the creation, organization,

powers and duties of a township planning conrnission; and for the regulation
and subdivision of land.
The following is a citation of Section M.S.A, #5,2963 (102) Purpose
of Planning, Section

z.

The purpose of plans prepared pursuant to this act shall be to promote
public health, safety and general welfare,; to encourage the use of resources

in accordance 1vith their character and adaptability; to avoid the over-crowding
of 'land by buildings or people; to lessen congestion on public roads and
streets; to facilitate provision for a system of transportation, sewage :dis,..
posal, safe and adequate water supply, recreation and other public improvements
and to consider the character of each township and its suitability for
particular uses judged in terms of such factors as the trend in land and
population development, (C , L. 48 #125,322.)

1

�INJBQDUCTION
Land Use Planning deals with the complex interrelation of two basic
resources, the land resource and the human resource.

The land is a fixed,

irreplaceable, non-expandable resource; population is an expanding and mobile
resource.

The present society is faced today with the challenge of accoIIIlilodat-

ing more people on a fixed ammmt of land.
Man's relationship to the land resource is one of both dependence and
dominance. i1an depends upon land and associated environmental systems for
all the necessities that sustain life.

At the same t:ime, human society has

developed to a high degree the ability to dominate and utilize the land resource.
Land use planning is an attempt to establish and maintain a balance between
the use and preservation of the land resource in order that it may provide a
sa,tisfying life for present generations and retain the ability to suppo5t_
future generations.
Life styles and social values rapidly and constantly change in our fast
paced culture.

Technological achievements are often far in advance of human

understanding.

Individually and socially, we need a method not only to an-

ticipate change, but also, to effectively meet the resultant demands of change ..
Plaiming has achieved a measure of success in helping people to anticipate the
future and provide for its needs because planning represents a systematic desire
to achieve a degree of order and hannony from the seemingly unrelatedli3-spects
\

of our world.
The basic intent of the Land Use Plan is to develop the land resource
capability and suitability for different land uses in the township.

A general

land use plan will be developed based on land resource capability-suitability,
which eventually will provide a base for a zoning map.

This plan is expected

to help make township development and land use decisions more rational,

2

�SECTION I
OVERVIEW OF THE TOWNSHIP
HISTORY
Location:
The history of the whole Great Lakes area is intimately tied into the
Les Cheneaux Islands.

The safe harbors of the many channels between the

islands harbored all the people who passed through the falls of the St. Mary's
River and the Straits of Mackinac.

Since the latter part of the nineteenth

century, the shores and islands of the township became the favorite summer resort
for the wll-to-do of Detroit, Cincinnati, Toiedo, Chicago, and Cleveland.

Now

with the opening of the St. Lawrence Seaway and increasing outdoor recreational
trends, particularly in the last three decades, a tremendous number of tourists
from all over the country, as well as from Canada, are discovering this
beautiful area.
Clark Township occupies the eastern and southern end of Mackinac County.
By road, it can be reached on M-134 east of 1-75 after a ten-mile drive; and
also from Pickford, in the north, on M-129; by boat on Lake Huron at the
Hessel or Cedarville docks; and by plane landing at the Hessel airport.

The

Township lies within the area described T43N, T42N, and RlW, RlE, and R2E. (Figure 1)
People:
The total permanent population in 1960 was 1563 which has increased about
35 % since 1950.

In 1970, the permanent population increased to 1771 or 13% and

in 1980 it increased to 1879 or 6%.

This moderate rate of population increase

is expected to continue but at a reducing rate in every decade in the remainder
of the century.

3

�Al

+

+
11 tu1H11uu1

I

//J!Oa.1-

H__i_ ,.IU&amp;E .

11D.

=--t

LIIO

&lt;i

"'

" i
II

--+----"'1

II

"

I ,-, ~~.
- _ _ __:_,,~~

.

"
II

'i'---

*,--f'
' . ., "~ "~~ -- ~ ~~ - - ~
II

0

l ~"1&lt;&gt; '

II

c:::

. ....

5(:

-

+

IJ

1.

CLARK TOWNSHIP
SCALE" IN MILES

j
__ _ )

...'-"'.,

,&lt;, I I

\

.-J- ,,

I

I

~

' 'c

-¼:1=1~

·'"'
,..,.,,

2

0

I

~-f

LEGEND
PAVED ROADS
GRAVEL ROADS

,,

-=L.:i
u,

I

NORTH

[

Ii

0

-i~

AIRPORT
OOAT HARBORS

•
e

FIG~RE 1

'
+

+

�Being highly resort and recreation-oriented, this township also attracts
a large number of tourists in summer.
somewhat difficult,

To estimate this seasonal population is

But, if we assume the family composition of these visitors

is about the same as the year-round families - 3.2 per household, and there are
739 seasonal dwellings, then the total tourist number would be about 2,364.
There are also approximately 259 resorts, motels, and campgrounds which
consist of about 1,295 units to rent which could bring in another 2,000 persons.
Thus, a nice summer day may have about 6,564 people in the township.
Whether these theoretical figures are true or exaggerated, the fact
remains that more than 15% of Mackinac County's population lives in Clark
Township.

This was also true during the last decade.

It is our observation

that the growth of this area is much more rapid than the rest of Mackinac
County,

Economy:
There are two major economic factors in the local economy, 1) limestone
operations by U.S. Steel Corporation and 2) recreation and resort oriented
economic activities.

Other than these two important factors, lumbering and

other wood-related operations have also some economic significance.

Overall

economic growth has been somewhat slow during the last ten years, which is
comparable to the national growth trend,

Now it is quite evident that there

are active commercial activities and a feeling of general optimism.

Most of

the commercial operations are in full gear with some expansion efforts.
Commercial properties are in demand.

6

�SECTION II
NAllJIW. AND CULTIJRAL VARIABLES AND Dffi~,U?!l\f\ffS
~

A.

RESOURCE INVENfOR,Y.

1,

Slope Interpretation.
The slope characteristics of an area help to give an understanding of

the drainage, erodibility and practicality of construction.

Figure 2 was

developed using USGS quadTangle sheets at a scale of two inches to one mile.
Slope wa,s deter,mined by measuring horizontal distance between contour lines
and is calculated in percent.

One percent slope means that there is a rise

or fall of one foot in horizontal distance of one hundred feet.

Because most

of; the township~s land rises evenly from the lakeshore northerly (except for

a few areas), only two broad categories were developed such as 0-lO!_~d more
tha,n 10% slope!

Figure 2 indicates that most of the township is fairly level

except for a few ridges which are scattered throughout the township, and has
a slope of more than 10%.

The islands and peninsulas fonn gentle mounds.

The largest ones are 50~60 feet above the lake level in the middle, while the
smaller islands are lower accordingly,

The most northern parts of the

township reach 950 feet absolute elevation or 400 feet above lake level.
2,

Soil Characteristics.
Soils are an essential part of the area's natural resource inventory and

are iJnportant in detennining building foundation strength, effectiveness of
septic tank sewage disposal, plant fertility, erosion hazards, and drainage
conditions.

All of these factors are crucial in detennining the nature and

extent of development that should occur within the township.

7

�_J

~

....J

_J

,.,.,_ESE

""'

...........
~
i

_ ..,.-'.,J.:

I , ii -

-

~-1'

'-&gt;II

•

I

. . . . . . !. . . . .

-1_

I I

I

•

~

II

II

I

,

I
'

RO___

\ ~

SWEDE

I

-- .

'

CLARK TOWNSHIP
':&gt;C .O Lf

1

1\. IVi hE'..&gt;

0
'

"
·,~,tc

·,-1,.

RO

·--

,~

LAND CONTOUR

,

-

lI
"

II

--

~

..

,(.
,,.
,
.
.
,
.
~ - - 7----- - .
,

...

.fr-

I'-~~'ii

I

,,I

'~~

"'
Ii

'

JII

:4111

\-~.
I~

1,

-,

I

I

,, " \ .

_.

_:1111

1
............
=-r.I-,,-,_ !f.
!. ...........................................
.
i

Ii

SWED£

...

•

~

~

~

'

)

J',..
.I

'

.

"?,

"',. ''

'I,

[

, I

\

-

ri·'"f';;; - -•
-1~

·'"'

·'

0

NORTH

LEGEND
PAVED ROADS
GRAVEL ROADS

FIGURE 2

OJ

LEGEND

L~

'

-

LESS

THAN 10% CONTOUR

GREATER THAN 10% CONTOUR

~

~

�2.

Soil Characteristics~ Continued,
A general soils survey, which was done during the 1920 's, is the only

l

reliable soils infonnation available for the township (Figure 3).
information consists of about SO different soil types.

This soils

Most of these soils

are not generally understandable; therefore, with the close cooperation of
the Soil Conservation Service (Mr. Dave Ottoson) each of these soils were
evaluated for their capabilities for residential and agricultural uses, and
were also grouped together in general and understandable terms like sandy
soils, clay soils, etc.

Figure 3, which is an original soil ' survey, indi-

cates that most 0£ the area in the township has stony (calcareous) soils
except the north"'west comer of the township where soils are somewhat sandy
in nature.

soils.

There are two other very small areas which have bedrock types of

These areas .actually have limestone deposits.

Soil analysis

indicates that the majority of the land in the township has severe limitations
for agriculture, commercial forestry and on-site sewer systems.
3. Vegetative Cover.
Thi.s varia,b.le contaii--is three types of infonnation; forest land, swampy
area, and open land,

This infonnation was taken from U.S. Geological Survey

Quadrangle Sheets which indicate that the majority of the area is under some
kind of low grade forest.

Most of the existing forest stand is second

growth which is composed of mixed hardwoods and conifers in the western part
of the township, whereas in the eastern part, cedars and scrub growth are
common. YlOst of the islands are heavily forested.

The existing ~rest stand

is not sufficient in quantity and quality to support any big ~ommercial
ope]'a,tion,
in the area.

Local soils also have severe limitations for commercial forestry
A::,

for agriculture,

mentioned earlier, local soils also have severe li.lJlitations
There has been very limited agriculture in the past and

a;nd this was mostly of the part-time or personal hobby-type variety.

r
r

9

�.

- -JI

~

~

:tll

)

~

_:M

~}

:ii

:.ill

f"'l':'f!lY~rffffhris
I= T]LTH:PHH
. ... ........ .. ........lk ...... W

.

~

....

, ____J

GENERAL SOILS

;- ··~+"1&amp;···~·c::·:··

CLARK TOWNSHIP
C.,

"-

~I ' L

0

0

~OR T H

LEGEND
PAVED ROADS
GRAVEL ROADS

FIGURE 3
,-~
'--

LEGEND

'

D

Mucks &amp; Wet Course Sands

HHHI

Sandy Soils

~

Stony Soils Calcareous"

-

Bedrock Soil s

11

·~

�3.

Vegetative Cover - Continued.

The northwestern comer of the township contains somewhat suitable soils for
agriculture which again, are not suitable for any big commercial agricultural
operation.

There are a few spots in the township which have swampy conditions.

A majority of the waterfront areas of the islands are identified as swampy

1

and low lying areas.
4.

(Figure 4)

Bedrock Geology.
Geologic factors play a major role in land use analysis.

The depth of

bedrock from the land surface is very critical for most of the land uses •
Generally, it is considered that if bedrock is within ten feet of the surface,
that area is incapable for land uses like residential, commercial, and industrial, etc., particularly where public sewer and water facilities are not
available,

Geological analysis reveals that more than half of the township!s

area has bedrock within ten feet of the surface (see Figure 5).

,

Such areas

with shallow bedrock have severe limitations for on-site sewage disposal
systems.

lviost of the bedrock which lies under the township is known as

Paleozoic rock which consists of limestone or engadine dolomite.
is being mined east 0£ Cedarville by U.S\ Steel.

Limestone

Figure 6 indicates areas

which haye rich quality of limestone and engadine dolomite,

These deposits

are near the surface and have a great economic potential.
5.

Land Ownership.
This man-made detenni..iallt (Figure 7) consists of three types of land

ownership~ 1) private, 2) public-state and federal, 3) corporated.

Out of

the total township area of approximately 50,907 acres, about 9133 acres are
in public ownership (state and federal), 7,432 corporated (U.S. Steel Corp.)
and 34,342 acres are in private smaller holdings.

11

�.,.

.
CL

-

I

(/)

• z~
0

0

,

~

N

...

V,

""_,
i
~

"'_,

Ill
Ill

- (Ji

C

z....

&lt;I

u

V,

c.,

...._,

0

12

...•
0

•••

&amp;.

•
C

w

Ill

0

• .
z

�-1

=71

I

..

":.it

=4

---21

,1'1J£!....~» ...!'0~ - • ...

,

L" A

A

')

~,

.

--=--

~

GENERAL GEOLOGY

l ""lllll.lll'#l••IIJtpl

CL ARK TOWNSHIP
SCA L E IN IIIILES
0

0

NORTH

LEGEND
PAVED ROADS
GRAV EL ROADS

-

- ===-'

FIGURE 5

,......
w

LEGEND

'

-

BEDROCK AT OR NEAR SURFACE

D

BEDROCK 10 FT. BEYOND SURFACE

'-"

�.

LL.I

t......

~

0

_J

0
0

;;,I

,

...- Ien

en
0

0

~

D:

-I:

~

,
,

C
"'..,
-'

i

~

-

w

-'

~~

..,.z
c.,
.....,.

I~

N

o~
a:

i

(/)

&lt;I

(/)0

"'

o&lt;t
c:tO
0

u

w

a.(!)

....J

I

1-(_,A\

t -

.¥ --- ...
•

c, ,

.
~

·/

,~
Olt

3"1/N

0

_J

:z:o

3:Z:

oc:i::

:z:

I

OLLI

z w&gt;
&gt; &lt;(
(!) &lt;( ct

LLJ

_J

0.. :E
l.J.J ......

~

oct
ct ....J

0

w a::
z &lt;{

~

LL.I

(/) :z:

u

C

rri

n

(/)

I-· 0
...... t&lt;.r, (/)
C LL.I

~

..J

~

0

a. z
w 3
Q

C,

u.

Cl..

£

1

11;.

�-

__.

_Ji

.

.

.J

~

:j

j

__j

.J

.:.

...

,

~..4

~

:__j

~

- 't

,,,,_

LAND OWNERSHIP

CLARK TOWNSHIP
SCALE IN MILES

2

0

0

NORTH

LEGEND
PAVED ROADS
GRAVEL ROADS

-==-=

1--'

FIGURE 7

(.J1

LEGEND

'
~

~

STATE/ FEDERAL

a

CORPORATE

D

PRIY A TE

•

-~-j

~

�-

6.

Existing Land Use.
The infonnation of this variable (Figure 8) was gathered through

a special survey which was conducted by the Eastern U.P. Regional Planning
and Development Connnission and later on was updated by the Township
Planning Connnission.

This variable contains structural development

infonnation which is divided into four categories: 1) year-rotmd residences,
2) seasonal homes and cabins, 3) commercial/industrial buildings, and
4) public buildings - schools, church and town hall, etc.

Figure 8 indi-

cates- that most of the development is along Highway M-134, particularlyconcentrated in Hessel and Cedarville--the only two comrrnm.ities in the
township.

There is some development occurring along M-129 and Three-

1'/ri.le Road north of Hessel, otherwise the rural area is very sparsely
populated. Most of the seasonal development is happening on the islands.

--

=

1

Some islands which have road access .with the mainland are also attracting
year-rolllld residential development.
A~mentioned earlier, most of the area of the township has severe

I

lirni.tations for on..--site sewage disposal, therefore, public sewer and
wa,ter a.re extremely necessary for concentrated development areas.

For

development on the islands and other rural areas of the township, a
strict control on the design for on-site sewage disposal systems should
be gdopted and en£oyced by the township.
According to our estimate, there are 706 year-rol.llld family h~ts.
\

7

1

Fo-P the last ten years, year-rol.llld residential development has been increasing at the rate of 30 units annually,

In the case of seasonal homes

a,nd cabins, the ~ate has also been 30 units per year for the last ten years.
Private seasonal homes and cabins increased at much higher rates than the
resort cabins .

The resort development in the area is leveling off to

300 cabins.

17

�~

J

J

,I

J

--~~e

e

eee

l ee
e

5

6

••

4

•

•
•

ee •

e

&lt; ..
e

ee

I

•

e

e

'

i:·---~

-111-"NIN,.,!Nlll•IIU"lt,hflOll!I ..... Hllt,

••

••
e

3

"

~,

2

e
7

e

II

9

8

6

\

'S I B

eee

e

12

I

.,
.

~

-~ i,""'--,

4

3

e

\.,t3

I

•

·~

7

LJ~I

2

~ft

n

~

9

11

) -:: 1

,

,-,
)

---

•

'

FIGURE 8

CLARK TOWNSHIP

12

!
8

ea

~ ~

~I

•

•

-_,.,, ~

e

••\ I

I

i

l !:i

}

If

17

t

21

ie

15

14

16

15

a~:

13

I

,1 '"'
2

22

.. e

"'
i -t~

~N

...

I

r,
--\

g

-- -l-

B

22

·~

':f

~

\i

t:

'!

24

Ir

t •

I

LEGEND

'-t

~

.'-5 .
27

~
r

26

.

~ 25

I

PAVED ROADS
GRAV EL ROADS

~

SCALE
0

---- --

2

1

,,
-

"

~~

.

~
II

ISLAND

BUILDINGS
HOMES

•

SEASONAL HOMES

8

RESORT
COMMERCIAL

•

INDUSTRI AL

*

�7.

Transportation.
Figure I .indicates that there are four modes of transportation in the

township.

In the case of road transportation, there are two major highways.

M-134 runs east"west along the shoreline and connects the township ·with
1-.. 75 in the west, and DeTour Village in the east.

The second major highway

M 129, starts from Cedarville and runs northward where it connects with
00

Pickford and then the City of Sault Ste. Marie.

Both of the highways are

;in fairly good condition and have a large volume of traffic throughout

year.

There are quite a few other roads which are mostly gravel roads

and do have problems, particularly in the spring.

..,_~

the

The road system in

Cedarville needs some redesigning, lighting and such other related
improvements.
There are a few miles of private railroad which carry limestone from
U.S. Steel quarry to the Port Dolomite to load the limestone on ships for
market places.
There are three harbors in the township:
and Hessel.

Port Dolomite, Cedarville,

Port Dolomite is strictly being used by the U.S. Steel Cor-

poration for limestone operation and it is made to the specification
of the operation.

In the past, commercial vessels used the Cedarville Dock,

but at present there are no proper facilities to handle corrrrnercial vessels.
At present, only pleasure crafts, excursion and fishing vessels use the
deteriorating fa.cility.

The harbor at Hessel is somewhat new and can

accommodate medium sized vessels.

Boat launching ramp facilities are present,

both -in Cedarville as well as in Hessel.

A new Clark Township Marina is

also being built in Cedarville to accommodate the ever increasing demand.
Another private harbor facility in Cedarville is being planned which will
make the total of four big commercial accesses to the waters of Lake Huron~

'r

19

�-I
UTILITIES PLAN

'
'.ii

21

21

22

It
ct:

RD.

27

29
"::.

...,
l:!....

~

(lj

::s

-::.

SCALE IN MILES

2

0

0

NORTH

7
7
7
7

~

PRESENT SEWAR GATHER ING SYSTEM

111111111

FORCED MAIN

*

LIFT STATIONS

LAGOON
11111111,

SYSTEM AND SPRAY

AAEA

(APPROXIr--ATE)

SEWAR SYSTEM AND PuBuc WATER SYSTEM (PRoPOsED)

21

FIGURE

9

'-

�...
8.

Utilities and Services - Continued.
Electric power is provided by the Edison Sault Electric Company

r

'

from Sault Ste. Marie and Cloverland Electric Coop, Inc., of Dafter.
Electric power service, both for domestic as well as for industrial and
corrunercial, is adequate at this time.

1

,

7
7'

7
7
""""

I

22

�SECTION III
J

DEVELOPf·'EHT OF C/lPABILHY CRilERIA
Capability of a certain geographic area, for different land uses for
human activities, depends on the proper combination of the physical features
of the ecosystem of that area .

For exa'llple, residential development requires

good soil conditions, adequate ground water if public supplies are not avail-

.,,

·a ble, and fairly level contour.

On the other hand, residential development

I

may create certain stresses such as pollution of ground water supplies with
septic tank effluent, or down-stream flooding caused by removing vegetative
cofer.

l
l

All of these factors must be considered before determining if a

particular area should be used for residential development .
· For these reasons, resource information presented previously can b~ ."
used to develop capability maps of such land uses as septic tanks, residential,
comrnercial-industrial, agricultural, recreational and etc.
In the case of Clark Township, the development of residential, forestry,
and agricultural capability maps were considered necessary.
"Capability" may be defined as the ability of the land to accommodate
its different uses without creating significant problems for either the
inhabitants of the area or the environment.
In order to develop residential and agricultural capability, phy1ical

7

characteristics of the area were rated in ranges of best, adequa~e, or

-

incapable.

These criteria were discussed and adopted by the Township Planning

Commission.

23

�CAPABILITY CRITERIA
PHYSICAL .ELEMENT

RESIDENTIAL WITI-IOUT
PUBLIC .SEWER &amp;WATER

AGRICULTURE ·

FORESTRY

Slope:
0- 5%
5-10%
10+%

B

B

B

A
I

A
I

A
I

Bedrock near or at the surface

I

I

I

Bedrock 10 or more feet
from the sur face

A

Depth of Bedrock:

Soils Classification:*

~

Loamy Soils

A

B

B

Clay Soils

I

A

A

Sandy Soils

A

I

I

fvluck Wet Sands

I

I

L ..

Beclrock Soils

I

I

I

Stoney Soils

I

I

I

Swamp Areas:
B = BEST
A= ADEQUATE
I = INCAPABLE
- + OOES NOT APPLY

-

~

To develop a residential capability map, the first step was to identify
those areas that are incapable of supporting residential development such as
slope 10% and over, swampy areas and bedrock closer to the surface and areas

-

with severe soil limitations. Areas with moderate soil limitations and the
areas i.vhere soil has a slight limitation for the on-site sewage disposal, are
marked as capable and most capable respectively.

(See Figure 10.)

-

?4.

�,111

-,:\I

,,1

-'ll'!l

-"!i i~!

~,11)

-'1111)

~~

.

r 1~]

I,

II

"'t
·
1

,i

~I

li

ll

... ,.........,...............
1

~1~

.

I'

""'"""'

.

.:...

1
1
If

.,

i;

r

111~1

-,,

111

11

.,,

11

RESIDENTIAL CAPABILITY
CLARK TOWNSHIP

i ?
II

,,

11

SCA LE IN MILES

15

/U ~ ~

0

I "

'~

•

I

0

2

-TH

"
LEGE ND
PAVED ROADS
GRAVEL ROADS
N

&lt;.n

FIGURE 10

LEGEND

'

~

-.TCAPAaLE

D

I.USTCAPMU

"1

�Similar criteria and procedures were used to develop agricultural and
forestry capability maps .

(These nio maps were not included in this document

because all of the towhship has severe limitations for agriculture and
commercial for estry.)

•

Figure 9, Residential Capability with on-site sewage

disposal systems , also indicate that most of the township's area is incapable
(with severe limitation) for on-site sewage disposal.

Some areas along the

northern border, where the soils are somewhat light in nature 'sandy soils)
are most capable of supporting on-site sewage disposal systems.

=ii

ii

-1
I

r
26

�SECTION IV

LAND USE OOALS FOR CLARK Tm:,NSHIP
Historical and physical knowledge of the area fonn the basis for a
logical starting point upon which goals and objectives can be developed.
The first section of this report provides necessary background infonnation
concerning location, dimension of the study area, population summary and the
economic overview of the township.

Section II provides natural and cultural

variables and detenninants which are critical in establishing area goals and
objectives.

This Section also includes capability--suitability infonnation

to be used as a guide for goals and objectives formulation by the township
officials.

Thus, to be realistic, township goals should match or clearly

reflect township potentials.

The physical infonnation mentioned above-~h.ould

assist township leaders and citizens since it portrays a clear picture of
the present situation, as well as its future potentials.
The following is a brief surmnary of the conclusions which were drawn from
the previous chapters and should be considered during the fonrrulation of
township development goals and objectives:
1. The population is expected to continue to increase at a accelerated rate.
It will reach to about 3, 400 by the end of this century, when it is about
2,200 in 1976.

2. Township has a great potential for further outdoor recreational developments.
3. The agricultural potential is insignificant in the area.
4. Commercial forestry has very limited potentials.
5. The area has severe limitations for on-site sewage disposal systems and
consequently rural development is generally unsuitable. Therefore, specific
and appropriate standards for on-site sewage disposal systems should be
enforced in the township.

7

6. For Cedarville, Hessel and other intensive development areas, public sewage
systems should be extended.

27

�I

•

7. Public water is also necessary for more developed areas because the underground water shows signs of contamination in certain areas of the
township at the present time.

-

8. Because of many islands and bays, the area is environmentally very sensitive and must be safequarded through proper zoning, subdivisions, and
other development controls.
9. Existing development patterns are reaching to the point where they could
harm the natural environment, as well as human well-beings.
·
10. The well- established image of the area as a boating and other water
oriented activity should be exploited.

-

Suggested Goals:
1. Natural environment of the township should be protected.
2. -Year-round development should remain in and around Cedarville and Hessel,
rather than hodgepodge development all over the area.
3. Primarily seasonal and recreational development should occur on the islands.

~

_

4. Improve economic base of the township by developing recreational potential
of the area.
5. Planned-unit development should be encouraged.

.....

·-1

\

~

I

J

..,

I

28

�'

SECTimJ V

•

...

The process of translating township land planning goals, wishes of the
people, and developmental constraints into a master plan, borders on be:ihg

an intuitive process. A simple computer-like ''balancing the books," lacks
the social and human dimensions ~hich are of utmost i.i11portance in developing .
a plan for any area.

Thus, the plan presented in thi s report, while never

abandoning the primary need to meet the hard facts, does reflect considerations
I

of human scale in development planning.

(

The basic concept in this planning effort is to regulate development in
such a manner that will preserve and protect the natural environment and rural
characteristics of the township.
Concept #1 - Planned Development
Future development in the township must be planned in such a way that the
township will be able to have input in development decisions by encouraging
criteria regarding density, design and the location ·of such development.

Through

the development and enforcement of such standards, township officials will be
able to:
1. Encourage growth in areas which are convenient . to existing public
services and. utilities, which :will in turn, keep public costs at
a minimum.
2. Control population densities in the developing areas, so as
to maintain a population balance within the township.
3. Through the encouragement of a particular design criteria, the
township officials can insure the design of new developments
consistent with the characteristics of the area, as well as the
adjacent development.

1
29

'l

.I

�I

••
Concept #2 - Commercial Development
Connnercial development in Clark Township should be such as to provide
the optimum level of services to residents, as well as visitors.

Most of the

general commercial development should occur in Cedarville and Hessel.

Recrea-

tional and resort oriented development, of course, should be in other appropri-

-

ate areas.
Concept #3 - Preservation and Protection of Natural Envirorunents
of the Township
This concept seeks to preserve and protect flood plains, wetlands, water-

-

&lt;

front by preventing those projects which call for major alteration of stream
beds or draining and filling of wetland and waterfront areas.

Ideally, these

features should be somehow incorporated into the design of future development.

...

...

""

-

�~;I

SECflm~ VI

/_

Although the resource analysis and the development of a capability map
are the major factors in determining the location of the township's future
growth, they do not constitute a basic land use plan.

A plan should join

together physical and cultural data with township goals in order to guide
development in a rational manner.

-

The purpose of this basic plan is to offer a hypothesis about the way
that Clark Township could develop, and give the limitations that have been set
forth in the preparation of capability process.

The plan should be used as a

. guide for decisions on how best township goals may be met (see Fi gure 11).

GENERAL LAND USE CATEGORIES
1.
'iii"

'

Urban Service Area
Both of the cormnunities, Cedarville and Hessel, are marked (see Figure 11)

as urban service areas in the township.

Analysis and synthesis of the physical

determinants indicate that most of the township land has severe limitations
~

for on-site sewage disposal, therefore, public water and sewer systems must
be provided to the majority of .the dwellings.

To make such services economically

,.=
I

feasible, development in these coTIUilunities should be encouraged whereas development in outlying areas should be discouraged.

A.

'F

I

r

General CoTIUilercial/Business District.
Most of these areas are under coTIUilercial use but there is enough
undeveloped area to accoTIUilodate the need for about the next 15 years.
These areas are marked so that corrnnercial and eneral business
development could be concentrate ra er tan e1ng mixe w1t other
conflicting uses. These areas are also the most convenient to the
general population of the township as well as to the tourist traffic.

31

�7

~

1

--J

............. ~r -

POGLESE

~

qo

i

~

~

~

~

-

J

"'"""1"-~-~1.

!I
k

I

1

'

=-

j

'

- , '\.

I
I

~

:-,o.,.

.,.

·-l
SW£0£

I

' !•
:~
RO

·-- ~

:J

1

FUTURE· LAND USE PLAN

CLARK TOWNSHIP

i 1,--

I

~
.

j

1

- --

SCALf IN MILES

~
0

~

2

0

NORTH

'

1:1_4 ·

LEGEND
PAVED ROADS
GRAVEL ROADS

w

,--=&gt;

FIGURE 11

LEGEND

'

H:::H

WATERFRONT DISTRICT

~

URBAN SERVICE AREAS

L:J
E2223

RURAL RESIDENTIAL

~

INDUIT• IAL

FORESTRY/ RECREATION

�1.

Urban Service Area-Continued.

B.

Single-family Residential District.
To keep residential development away, but still a convenientqistance from commercial and educational areas this district
is marked. It is recommended primarily tor residential uses. 1hls
area -has also good road access, as well as most of the existing
residential development, but still there is enough room for future
residential land needs. By concentrating residential development in
specific areas, it will reduce land use conflicts and will make
living environments safe, desirable and pleasant. 1\vo families
er acre are su gested but ins ecial cases, eyen denser development
coul e allow .

;-

C.

Recreational Corrnnercial District.
As it is well known, the 100st important characteristic of the tmmship

is water-oriented recreation. Although the area has good water-oriented
recreational facilities, still the resource is not fully developed.
To capitalize the area's full resource potential, a specific district
is suggested so that future recreational commercial development should
be encouraged. This area is marked specifically for recreational
commercial development which hopefully, will help to expand the
economic base of the township. Most of the existing recreational
facilities exist in this area. It is convenient to the residents, as
well as it will attract the tourist in such a location where they will
be economically productive and envirornnentally least hannful. Conflicting developments, e.g., residential should be discouraged~
this district.

-

2.

Waterfront District
The scenic attractions of nature are the virtues that tourists seek in this

township.

Lake Huron's waterfront and a unique gift of God, the Les Cheneaux

Islands Complex, are the most important economic as well as aesthetic resource
of the township.

The increasing interest in outdoor recreation and to live

with nature has created a tremendous demand on such waterfront properties. At
the same tL"'lle, these areas are highly environmentally sensitive.

Therefore, the
i

entire waterfront area~ including all of the islands, is marked a separate
district to regulate the development.

Land capability analysis indicates that

the majority of this district has severe limitations for on-site sewage disposal
systems.

To provide public water and sewer services is practically impossible,

but the development of these areas is inevitable.

Therefore, to control the

development in such a fashion in which the least hann will result, is a very

33

�-

•
I

2.

Waterfront District-Continued

rational and logical approach.

This approach should be based on the prinicples

!

of preservation and conservation of the said resource.
· People must realize that everything of significance cannot be saved.

The·

detennination of these areas for preservation and conservation is an exercise
to make the citizens, as well as the public officials, aware that they have a
direct responsibility for the future of the area.

The waterfront district is

marked as a separate area in the township, mainly for development such as
seasonal cottages, homes, and parks, etc., with strict and conservative controls.
3.

•.
•.

-.

Industrial District
As mentioned in the resource analysis section, the township does not have

an industrial economy except the U.S. Steel limestone operation east of
Cedarville and some other very minor activities as block manufacturing, woodrelated, etc.

The area does have a potential to expand its limestone operation.

There are two major areas marked as industrial districts.

Most of the-lf.S.

Steel Co. property contains high quality limestone deposits which are included
in this district.
for industrial use.

Two other areas north of Hessel near the airport are marked
One site, where a block manufacturing operation exists, is

suitable for heavy industry; whereas the /.liecond site, which is closer to the
airport, is appropriate for light industry.

-...
-

-

These areas are at a reasonable

distance from the populated areas which make this district a very rational and
desirable location.
4.

Both sites have good transportation.

Forestry/Recreation
The land ownership indicator reveals that a sizeable portion of the land

in the township is under state forest which is open to the public for outdoor
recreation.

Forestry and outdoor recreation (extensive) uses have the least

conflict and often overlap each other.
established.

Therefore, one combined district is

.
II

It also includes the areas which are least capable physically

•
34

�4.

Forestry/Recreation-Continued

for other uses in order that such areas could be protected from unsuitable
development.

It also contains areas that are suitable for other developments

such as residential or industrial, but these should not be used because of
the limited demand.. As demand in the future increases, some parts of this
district could be used with proper planning procedures.

Existing district

bmmdaries could expand in the future into this district if the demand increases
in the area.

It will also serve as an area preserve for future needs.

At

this time, the area should be mainly used for forestry and outdoor recreation
related activities.

Rural residential development should also be allowed with

very liberal lot sizes and strict standards for on-site sewage disposal systems.

An average density of one-family per ten acres is suggested.
5.

Rural Residential
At present there is a significant rural type residential development

occurring north of the tonwship a~rport.
area is quite appropriate.

To live in rural environments; this

An average density of one family per two acres is

a desirable pattern for development in this category of land use.
The land in this category should be subdivided in such a manner that when
-

the pressure of development increases.(particulaily when industrial area
,;t

~

across the road is developed) it can easily )&gt;e\4v:eloped to a greater density
of dwellings per acre.

I

r
!

t

\

-1
I

/

35

�SECTION VII
HllSlER TIWiSFURTATIOM Pl.PH
TI1is portion of the plan is adopted from the existing Clark Township
Master Plan.
AIR TRANSPORTATION

Hessel Airport facility is adequate for the present need.
top runway, a hangar and other necessary buildings.

It has a black

Under the existing

circUJI1Stances, no major new developments are suggested for the near future,
except for improvements such as runway lights, etc.
WATER TRANSPORTATION ·

Clark Township is a water-oriented community and outside of the hundreds
of small private moorings and docks, has three harbors: Port Dolomite,
Cedarville, and Hessel. The Hessel harbor· is fairly new but too small to serve
the needs of the..area. · It is necessary to develop a finger-pier to expand the
existing capacity as a short-range action.

It would be quite appropriate to

develop a second harbor of similar size facing west, and the platfonn between
the two basins to be developed as the town center.
TI1e existing Cedarville marina development project should not end by the
completion of township marina facility but it should continue to expand the
project by developing other related facilities such as park and picnic areas
along the waterfront in the future.

This site has much more potential than

it has been realized.

36

�SECTIC!'l VI II
UT! LI TIES f11\SIER Pl.PH
As it has been discussed throughout this plan, most of the land in the

township has severe limitations for on-site sewage disposal systems. Al.111ost
the entire township is sitting on limestone or other bedrock material.
of this rock is fractured.

Most

Being underground rock and closer to the surface

-reduces· the sewage absorption rate to the minimum, in other words, raw sewage
. ~ets through the limestone cracks and reaches the ground water· to the lakes
and streams, which might contaminate the underground water as well as pollute
surface waters.

Few wells have indicated low levels of contamination which,

according to the Health Department, could reach to the critical level after a
decade.

Ever increasing pressures of development in the area might accelerate

the Tate of contamination.

A few years ago, this problem was realized by the

people of the township which resulted into limited public sewage disposal
system.

At present, about 200 dwellings are being served, whereas the system

has the capacity to service about 800 dwellings.

In the beginning, the system

was planned to serve not only Cedarville, but also Hessel and other developing
areas around these communities.

Since this system was put in, quite a few

other areas have experienced new development which make them necessary to have
such service.

Figure 9 indicates the area which is being served and _tfe pro' available.
posed areas where this service should be provided as soon as funds become
Some of these areas are reaching to the critical point.
There is no public water supply system at this time whic...1.i is equally important to have in the area as a sewage disposal system.

It is recominended that

the toWJ).ship should direct their efforts to obtain this service as soon as possible.

37

�L

Initially, it should provide water to Cedarville and Hessel's central connnunity
qr~as a,nd a few years later it should be expanded to other developing areas.
The Economic Development Administration and the Envirornnental Protection
Agency of the Federal Government are two potential ftmdi ng sources which
should be investigated by the township.

7
.....
-,

38

�SECTION IX
MASTER RECREATION PLAN
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
1.

Clark Township has no formal or informal park and recreation board.

The

Township Planning Commission functions as an advisory body to the Township Board
in matters dealing with planning and zoning, including rec:,eation.

The Township

Board directs and controls all township-owned recreation facilities,
2,

Community Description
See page #3-22

3.

Recreation Inventory
See table #1 and Figure #2

4.

PROBLEMS/ISSUES/NEEDS
Major recreation _problems include the lack of certain types of recreational

facilities, and the lack of money.

Another problem is the need for a park and

recreation board and recreation director which would supervise the overall
recreational program and the maintenance of the facilities,

At present, the

Township board has direct responsibility for this supervision.
The need for specific types of recreational facilities has been identified
by the Clark Township Board and the Clark Township Planning Commission.

Included

in the list of needed facilities are (in no particular order):
- picnic areas
- swimming beaches in Snow
Channel and Mismer Bay
- bicycle paths
- restrooms and finger piers
at the Cedarville Mooring
and Launching Facility

finger piers at the Hessel Marina
- skateboard area
tennis court(s) in Hessel
- Bay City Lake State Forest
Campground improvements
- hiking, cross-country skiing, nature,
snowshoe trails.

39

�TABLE 1

CLARK TOttr£HIP RECREATION FACILITIES
OWNERSHIP

NAME

1)*

- 1
FACILITIES

Government Island
Picnic Areas

Federal

4 picnic tables, 2 grills,
2 vault-type toilets.

2)

Bay City Lake Forest
Campground

State

12 campsites, swimming area,
vault-type toilets, gravel boat
ramp, parking

3)

Snowmobile Trail
(Cedarville-Kinross)

State

Department of Natural Resources
l!Toomed trail, 26 miles.

4)

State High,vay Scenic
Turnout .CM-134)

State

Picnic tables.

5)

Hessel Boat Harbor
and Ramp

Township

10 transient accomodations, gasoline, telephone (pay station),
water, restrooms (flush toilt'ifs),
showers, haulout facilities.

6)

Outdoor Skating Rink,
Basketball, Tennis
Court

Township

Outdoor concrete skating rink,
basketball court at one.. end,
tennis court at other end.

7)

So£ tball field

Township

Backstop, filed.

8)

Co_mmunity Center

Township

Large hall, bathrooms, kitchen,
stage, storage rooms, skating
warming room.

9)

Cedarville Mooring
and Launching
Facility

Township

Boat launching ramp, parking,
mooring area, pirnic tables.

10)

Athletic Field

Les Cheneaux
Community
Schools

Football/baseball/softball combination area, tennis court, basketball court.

11)

Indoor School
Facilities

Les Cheneaux
Community
Schools

Gymnasium, all-purpose room,
older gyrrmasium

12)

Les Cheneaux Club
Golf Course

Private (but
open to public)

Nine-hole golf course.

13)

Cedarville to Hessel
Snowmobile Trail

Private &amp;State.
This is a state
contractually
groomed trail

20 mile long groomed trail.

I

-r
-

1

--,

*Numbers correspond to identical ntnnbers on Map
-,

40

�. l

RECPEATION AfB\S

+

FIGURE 12

r. :.1~~r_
,·J-..:. l. .:~r. . . . . . :- - · - - : -.
:..

ST

14'~

RO

_

.
~,
t

II

-~

. a
·c- - ~
I

11

II

I
I

_

- -• - - - ~ ¾ -

_

~

_

!

~ - __

,'\

~

110

,;I:!,0£

- -=--· '

--

:

"

:

CLARK TOWNSHIP

:

SCAU IN ,_.I LES

~

11/'11

t

:IW£0T

-J~ 1

@I

•~•

.

I

·---,------:------r·--·:----·-- ......:..

I

l
'

t

:

!'&gt;

"

"

"'ea)
n

I
I

I,

-

··,.

II

Q

IJ

&lt;_,,

"-

I '-

.

I

-•,\ I

'1

"\J

. '-

1

&lt;I
'

l

\._.o"
\._&lt;,_
.

,1

~T:
1(

". ~

.

....,,.

I

\

I~

1.

'

3.
4.
5.
6.

0

NORTH

:

1

~

0

II

;

~~

2.

2

:

~

#.

J

- -;

\~

~
......

0

I

l
;
V't., , ___;

1

___(

v ,._

.

+

+

LEGEND
PAVED ROADS
GRAVEL ROADS

AIRPORT
BOAT HARBORS

-=-=

*
e

7. Softball Field
8. Community Center
9. Cedarville Mooring
and Launching Facility
Government Island Picnic Areas 10. Athletic Field*
Bay City Lake State Forest
11. Indoor School
Campground and Access Site
Facilities*
DNR Snowmobile Trail
12.
Les
Cheneaux Club
Scenic Turnout
Golf Course
Hessel Boat Harbor and Ramp
13. Cedarville-Hessel
Outdoor Skating Rink, BasketSnowmobile Trail
ball Court, Tennis Court*
*Numbers 6, 8, 9 1 10, and
11 are located 1n
Cedarville.

+

�/\

Restrooms and additional finger piers at the newly-developed
Cedarville Mooring and Launching Facility are much needed development
items. These facilities are not developed with the initial construction
phase due to budgetary constraints. The restrooms and finger piers
would serve the public and would be especially usefull for island
residents who wish to moor their boats and shop in town or engage in
village activities. Finger piers also should be developed at the
Hessel Marina to serve the public and especially the island residents.
Skateboarding has become increasingly popular in Clark Township
in recent years among the younger people. With this increased
popularity has also come the potential of vehicular or pedestrian
conflicts . Development of a skate-boarding area utiliz i ng the
paved parking lot at the local Catholic Church has been mentioned.

5.

Long-Range Recreation Development Goals
(1)

6.

Provision of recreation facilities which meet the diverse
and expanding needs of this local population and the ever
increasing tourist population of Clark Township .

Short-Range Objectives (Projects)
(1)

Expansion of Finger Piers at Hessel Marina . Necessary to
increase usable space for Recreational Boating.

(2)

Development of swimming b .e ach in Snow Channel near the
golf course in Cedarville.

(3)

Development of tennis court in Hessel Community.

(4)

Development of swimming beach on Mismer Bay off Brulee
Road near Hessel.

(5)

Horse shoe facility-location yet to be determined.

These projects are listed in priority order.

-42-

�7. Action and Financial
PROJECT
(1) Finger Piers at Hessel

Marina which would
increase the Recreation
and Economic Potential
of the area

-Michigan Bond Program
(proposal "D")
- Twp. General Fund
- Local Donations

FY. 1989-90

~ 1eo,coo

(2) Swimming beach in
Cedarville

-Land &amp; Water Conservation
fund
-Revenue Sharing fund
-Township general fund
FY. 1984-1985

(3) Tennis Court in
Hessel

-Land &amp; Water Conservation fund
-Revenue Sharing fund
-Township General Fund

1985-1986

-Land &amp; Water Conservation fund.
-Revenue Sharing fund
-Township General Fund
-County Grant

1986-1987

-Revenue Sharing fund
-Township General fund

1987-1988

(4) Swimming beach
near Hessel

(5) Horse Shoe
acility

8. Plan Review and Adoption
A. Clark Township Planning Commission
B. Clark Township Board of Trustees

-43-

�SECTION X
PROPOSED ZONING Ml\P
The most important measure the township can use to achieve its comprehensive
planning goals is zoning.

A well designed ordinance along with an equally well

designed map of zoning districts, followed by fair and just administration will
go a long way toward the proposed implementation of a plan.

If improper zoning

is provided and administration is ineffective, the plan will prove not to be
useful, and the goals of the Clark Township will not be achieved.
RECQ.\MENDATION #1
Redesign the existing zoning. ordinance and map in order to maintain and promote comprehensive planning concepts.
Following are the suggested zoning districts: (See Figure No. 13, 14, 15.)
1.

Urban Service District
Both of the existing co:mrrrunities (Cedarville and Hessel) are well established and are considered valuable heritage of the entire Les Cheneaux
area. Both of these settlements serve as economic and social activities
centers. They also provide some of the urban-like services. They have
a significant potential for further development to play even stronger
roles in the future. Therefore, the identity of these communities must
be protected and development potential be exploited. Following are the
detailed zoning districts in these co:mrrrunities which are proposed for
consideration.

1
1

A.

General Commercial/Business District - G.C.: This district should
allow most commercial uses, but strict aesign standards should be
encouraged. Thus allowing,a pleasing and uniform appearance will
be insured.

B.

Sin le Family Residential District - S.F.: Two families per acre
(43,560 sp. ft. are suggested in most of this district but in the
future certain areas adjacent to the controlled commercial area
should be redesigned for multi-family dwelling (apartment) depending
on demand. By doing this, it would reduce the conflict with the
existing character of the township as well as it would prevent an
excessive pressure on the ground water supply. All development in
this district would have to be served by public sewer systems.

C.

Recreational Commercial - R.C.: The most important economic factor
of the township is commercial recreation, therefore, to capitalize
the full resource potential this special district is suggested. It
should be primarily used for commercial recreation facilities development. Other conflicting uses should not be allowed.

l
l
1
1

1

44

�r

REC(l,f,ffiNI)ATION #1 - Con't.
2.

Industrial District - I.D.
This district indicates areas for both heavy and light industries.
Limestone mining and processing (U.S. Steel Corp.) is the most important
· industrial activity in the township. Most of the U.S. Steel Corp.
property is marked as industrial area. An area north of the airport has
some heavy industrial activity. If its existing use is continued,
similar industrial operations might be attracted in the future. A
tract of land adjacent to the airport is proposed for light industries.
Both of these areas near the airport should be designed specifically as
industrial parks. Standard for noise, smoke, odor, etc., should be
established to prevent an adverse impact on adjacent rural residential
districts.

3.

Rural Residential District - R.R
Rural living is a very significant part of the life style in this township. To protect this social value of the people, a specific area for
rural living must be provided. At present there is significant rural
type residential development occurring north of the airport. This• area
is proposed to be used as rural residential. An average density of the
one-family per two acres is a desirable pattern for development in'· this
category of land use. It is also proposed that land in this district
should be subdivided in such a manner that when the pressure of development increases (particularly when industrial area across the road is
developed) it can easily be developed to a greater density of dwellings
per acre.

4.

~

Waterfront District
Waterfront characteristic of the township is the most important economic,
as well as aesthetic, resource. There is a tremendous development pressure on such areas which also include most of the islands and bays.
Under such circumstances, it is proposed that all such waterfront areas
should be marked to regulate the development. Conservation and preservation of these tmique and environmentally very sensitive areas should
be promoted with utmost care.

5.

Forestry/Recreation - F.R.
Forestry and outdoor recreation have the least land use conflict and
often overlap each other. Al though commercial forestry has severe
limitations in the area, still the majority of the land of-1:he township
is covered with some low quality vegetation. It is mostly record growth.
The purpose of this district is to protect this essential vegetative
cover and open space for rural environment as well as a place for outdoor recreation, e.g., htmting, snowmobiling, hiking, camping and etc.
This district will also keep excessive areas preserved for other uses
to expend as the demand will increase in the future. Although forestry
and outdoor recreation are the main uses, some with limitations and with
special permission, other uses should be allowed, e.g., hunting, cabins,
seasonal cabins and other residential with liberal lot sizes. Ten acres
per lot size is recommended.

-

7

...

7

-.
45

j

�RECQ\1MENDATION #2

Develop a Township Capital Improvement Program.

Comprehensive planning is

a useful tool only when its principles and concepts are in time with local fiscal
resources.

That is to say the conmrunity must be willing to commit ·available

resources (fiscal and man hours) over a period of time to accomplish a particular
objective.
The concept of a capital improvement program means that the township should
establish priorities over a three-to-five year period for sewer lines, roads,
parks and such other projects.

By developing such a priority list, the township

can evaluate its resource base and determine the funds necessary on an annual
basis to implement the projects.

The end result will be a smooth completion of

planned projects in a coordinated cost effective manner.
RECOMMENDATION #3

It is also suggested that the existing planning connnission and 0-tl:l,er boards
and committees should continue to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of
the township government.
The Township Planning Commission should remain an intergral part of the
township government by adhering to plan goals and associated concepts, development
can be guided in the most complementary and cost effective manner.

]

l
l
l
l
l
l

The Commission

should also evaluate new land plats and sites to more fully achieve the desired
goals.
Other committees on recreation and public utilities and services should
also continue to provide their services to assure that the best possible recreation
and public services are provided to the people of the area.
By continuing the function of existing committees and establishing additional ones when needed, the township government will be strengthened and improve
its function.

46

�CEDARVILLE
PROPOSED ZONING MAP

I

- -.

t\,11, · ·
I,
I

I
:J

1
1
1
1
1

~
~.

J

~' I

I

\

1 ..,-.

'
SC A LE IN MI L ES
~--,:

4

(,

1

14

-'

1

Pc1ve d Roads
Grc=i vel Roc1ds

-

-

\

,,
\

' ',
' -,,"''

Recreational/ Commercial
Genera I! Commercial
Single Family Residential
High School

·--·-~

-~

Wllllllllllll
t:··:;:-:·::\··:·:·=·q

[ J
W/22

Light Industrial

l
47

FI GURE

14

�~

~

~

POGl..£S£

('" ""' ""itm -

-

~

~

110

•

111111 .1!

~

-

flO

SI

t l l t l l l l l ' f l l l ~'

-

"'I

r'

t
:.,.

I

'

-

I

~t

PROPOSED ZONING MAP

CLARK TOWNSHIP

'\.

~

~)-•

SW£0E

~

SCALE IN MIL ES

f:'1o~ers •

,.

!fl]~N

'

Al I.J4

f
j

•

0

2

0

RO

NORTH

:t

sJ
~

'

~•v~

LEGEND
PAVED ROADS
GRAVEL ROADS

-=-=

+'&gt;

OJ

FIGURE 13

LEGEND

'

cm=n

WATIRFIIONT DISTRICT

~

Ult AN SERVICE AREAS

c::J

FOltHTRY/HCHATION

fZ::Z]
~

•

IIUIIAI. HIINNTIAL
INDUSTRIAi.

�NESSEL

PIOPOSEI ZOlflNI

• AP

•••••••••••••••••••••••••~••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••L

.-••

+:&gt;

Scale in Mi~s

I.O

0

114

Paved Roads
Gravel Roads

- - --•------•--.--.

1~ ·

-

. . . . . . . . . . . . _. .. __________

.......UllllffUJIIUIWlllb..
..-uv-n,-.

1

North

FIGURE 1s

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007423">
                <text>Clark-Twp_Master-Plan_1970s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007424">
                <text>Clark Township Planning and Zoning Commission, Clark Township, Mackinac County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007425">
                <text>circa 1970</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007426">
                <text>Clark Township Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007427">
                <text>The Clark Township Master Plan was prepared by the Clark Township Planning and Zoning Commission, the Mackinac County Board, and the Eastern U.P. Regional Planning and Development Commission in the 1970s.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007428">
                <text>Mackinac County Board (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007429">
                <text>Eastern U.P. Regional Planning and Development Commission (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007430">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007431">
                <text>Clark Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007432">
                <text>Mackinac County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007433">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007435">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007436">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007437">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007438">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038269">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54643" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58914">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/53043210af6e2ec48383d8814b4fbbb1.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a7d11208e553e6ae5cec004826f80cfa</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1007422">
                    <text>COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN

Clark Township

July 8,

1994

�CLARK TOWNSHIP
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Prepared By:
Clark Township Planning Commission

With the Assistance of:
Mark A. Wyckoff, AICP
David R. Tyler
Dana G. Richardson

Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.
302 S. Waverly Road
Lansing, Ml 48917

517/886-0555

July 7, 1994

�LIST OF FIGURES
2-1
2-2
2-3
6-1
6-2

Clark Township Historic Population ...................................... 2-3
Construction Permits Issued for New Housing Units .............. 2-5
Clark Township State Equalized Value Residential .............. 2-10
Clark Township Historic Plat Maps ....................... ................. 6-3
Land Use/Cover Classification .............................................. 6-5

•

•

�LIST OF MAPS
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
5-1
5-2
5-3
5-4
5-5
5-6
6-1
6-2
6-3

Land Contour ....................................................................... 3-3
Geology ................................................................................. 3-4
General Soils ........................................................................ 3-6
Wetlands ............................................................................... 3-7
Forested Cover ...................................................................... 3-9
Environmentally Sensitive Areas ......................................... 3-10
Existing and Proposed Sewer ................................................ 5-3
Proposed Public Service Districts .......................................... 5-5
Septic Field Limitations ......................................................... 5-7
Recreation Facilities ............................................................ 5-13
Traffic Counts ..................................................................... 5-15
Transportation Existing Conditions ..................................... 5-16
Existing Land Use ................................................................. 6-6
Land Divisions .................................................................... 6-10
Future Land Use ................................................................. 6-12

1

�LIST OF TABLES
2-2
2-1
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
2-7
2-8
2-9
2-10
5-1
5-2
5-3
6-1
7 -1

County Population ................................................................ 2-3
Clark Township Historic Population ...................................... 2-3
Construction Permits Issued for New Housing Units .............. 2-5
Median Age ........................................................................... 2-6
Clark Township Tax Levy ....................................................... 2-9
Clark Township State Equalized Values ............................... 2-10
Clark Township Top Five Occupations .................................. 2-11
Clark Township Top Five Industries ...................... .. .......... .. .2-11
Median Income Levels - 1990 .............................................. 2-12
Percent in Poverty - 1990 ........................................ ............ 2-13
Sewer Facility Capacity ......................................................... 5-2
Well and Septic System Permits, Clark Township,
Mackinac County ............................................................. 5-6
Clark Township Recreations Facilities ................................. 5-14
Land Use/Cover Classification .............................................. 6-5
Recreation Facilities and Their Minimum Number
or Size Necessary to Achieve Minimum Points ................... 7-9

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1 - The Planning Process
Purpose of the Plan .................................................................... 1-1
How to Use the Plan .................................................................. 1-2
How the Plan was ..................................................................... 1-4
Chapter 2 - Community Profile
Introduction .............................................................................. 2-1
Spatial Location ......................................................................... 2-1
Demographics ............................................................................ 2-2
Population and Density .................................................... 2-2
Race and Household ......................................................... 2-3
Housing ........................................................................... 2-4
Age ................................................................................... 2-5
Education ........................................................................ 2-6
School Enrollment ............................................................ 2-6
Economy ................................................................................... 2-7
Tourism ........................................................................... 2-7
Public Finance ................................................................. 2-8
Labor Force and Employment ........................................... 2-9
Income ........................................................................... 2-11
Chapter 3 - Natural Features
Introduction ............................................................................ .. 3-1
Coastal and Surface Water Resources ........................................ 3-1
Topography................................................................................ 3-2
Geology ..................................................................................... 3-2
Soils .......................................................................................... 3-5
Wetlands and Drainage Ways .................................................... 3-5
Vegetative Cover ....................... ................ ................................. 3-8
Sensitive Areas .......................................................................... 3-8
Environmental Quality Issues .................................................. 3-11
Pollutants ................................................................................ 3-12
Soil Erosion ............................................................................. 3-12
Toxic Substances ..................................................................... 3-13
Alteration of Natural Processes ................................................ 3-14
Human Intervention ................................................................ 3-15
Act 307 Sites ........................................................................... 3-16
Chapter 4 - Community Goals, Objectives and Policies
Introduction .............................................................................. 4-l
The Purpose of Goals and Objectives ......................................... .4-1
Defining Goals ........................................................................... 4-1

�Defining Objectives ................................................................... .4-2
Economic Development .............................................................. 4-2
Land Use ................................................................................... 4-3
Community Character ............................................................... 4-3
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources ...................... 4-4
Community Services and Infrastructure ..................................... 4-5
Housing ..................................................................................... 4-6
Social Needs .............................................................................. 4-6
Public Safety.............................................................................. 4-7
Recreational And Cultural Opportunities ................................ .. .4-7
Chapter 5 - Public Services, Facilities and Transportation
Introduction .............................................................................. 5-1
Sewage Treatment ...................................................................... 5-1
Public Service Districts .............................................................. 5-4
Existing, Expanded and Future Service Districts ........................ 5-4
Rural Service Districts ............................................................... 5-8
Island Service Districts .............................................................. 5-9
Potable Water ............................................................................ 5-9
Stormwater Management ......................................................... 5-10
Electric Power .......................................................................... 5-10
Police and Fire Protection .................................................... -.... 5-11
Recreational and Cultural Facilities ......................................... 5-11
Transportation ......................................................................... 5-12
Township Airport ............................................................ -......... 5-18
Other Access Points ................................................................. 5-19
Chapter 6 - Existing and Future Land Use and Policy Statements
Introduction .............................................................................. 6-1
Land Fragmentation .................................................................. 6-2
Land Cover ................................................. ............................... 6-4
Existing Land Use ...................................................................... 6-4
Future Land Use ........................................................................ 6-7
Future Land Use Map .............................................................. 6-11
Rural/Forest Land Use ................................................... 6-11
Island Residential ........................................................... 6-14
Rural Waterfront ............................................................ 6-16
Urban Resident .............................................................. 6-17
Commercial Centers ....................................................... 6-18
Industrial and Mineral Extraction Activities .................... 6-21
Policy Statements .................................................................... 6-21
Land Use ........................................................................ 6-22
Rural/Open Space ......................................................... 6-26
Single Family Residential (Public Sewer
Services District) ........................................................ 6-27

~

,

�Waterfront Residential .................................................... 6-28
Island Residential ........................................................... 6-29
Commercial/Industrial Development .............................. 6-30
Transportation ............................................................... 6-32
Chapter 7 - Strategies for Implementation
Primary Implementation Tools ................................................... 7-1
Relationship to Zoning ..................................................... 7 -1
Relationship to Plans/Zoning in Adjacent Jurisdictions .... 7-2
Relationship to Subdivision Regulations ........................... 7-2
Relationship to Capital Improvements ........................ ...... 7-2
Land Use &amp; Infrastructure Policies ................................... 7-3
Community Participation and Education .......................... 7 -3
Special Area &amp; Financing Techniques .................................. ....... 7 -3
Building and Property Maintenance Codes ....................... 7 -3
Community Development Block Grant Program ................ 7-4
Michigan State Housing Development Authority
(MSHDA) Programs ............................................ .- ......... 7-6
Land and Water Conservation Fund ................................. 7 -6
Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund ........................... 7 -7
Costal Zone Management Fund ....................................... .7-7
The Recreation Bond Fund ............................................... 7 -8
Recreation Improvement Fund .......................................... 7-9
Local Facility Development Grants .................................. 7-10
Land Acquisition Grants ................................................. 7-10
Waterways Fund ............................................................ 7-10
Road Funds .................................................................... 7 -11
Public Works Financing ........................................................... 7-12
Tax Incentives .......................................................................... 7-12
Additional Recommendations ................................................... 7-13
Other Planning &amp; Economic Development Assistance ..... 7-13
Pro-Business Alliance ..................................................... 7 -13
Poverty ...................................................... ................. .. .. 7 -14
Public Open Space Acquisition ....................................... 7 -14
Periodic Updating and Revisions ..................................... 7-15
Managing Growth and Change ....................................... 7 -15
Revision of Ordinance ..................................................... 7 -15

�CHAPTER 1 - THE PLANNING PROCESS

Purpose of the Plan
The purpose of this Plan is to guide policy and decision making
for all future land use and infrastructure development
decisions within Clark Township. Within the Plan, key
planning issues are identified; goals, objectives and policies are
outlined; public facility standards are established; future land
uses are described and mapped; and specific implementation
measures are recommended.
This Plan is adopted pursuant to the authority of the Township
Planning Act, PA 168 of 19 59. This Act provides for the
preparation of a "basic plan" to promote community health,
safety, and welfare through provisions for the use of land and
resources and the assurance of adequate publiG facilities and
services. The Clark Township Master Plan is a "basic plan." It is
prepared as a foundation for, and depends primarily on, the
Township's zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations,. and
capital improvement program for its implementation. Although
this Plan states specific land use development policy and
proposes specific land use arrangements, it has no regulatory
power.
All proposed future land uses and policies presented in this
Plan were developed based on a combination of the natural
capability of the land to sustain certain types of development;
the important natural functions played by unique land and
water resources in the area; the relative future need for
residential, commercial, and industrial land uses; the existing
land use distribution; the relationship of undeveloped lands to
existing community character; and the desires of local
residents and public officials as expressed through the
community and leadership surveys, and public meetings.
This Plan is intended as support for the achievement of the
following public objectives, among others:
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN

1-1

�• to protect and promote public health, safety and general
welfare;
• to conserve and protect property values by preventing
incompatible uses from locating adjacent to each other;
• to protect and preserve the natural resources, unique
character, and environmental quality of the area;
• to maintain and enhance employment opportunities and tax
base of the area;
• to promote an orderly development process which is paced
in coordination with the Township's ability to provide
services and which permits public officials and citizens an
opportunity to monitor change and review proposed
development in a reasonable manner; and
• to provide information from which to gain a better
understanding of the area and its interdependencies and
interrelationships, and upon which to base future land use
and public investment decisions.
How to Use the Plan

This Plan is organized into seven chapters with five critical
components. First, is the community profile presented in
Chapter 2 which provides the basis for a common
understanding of the trends and conditions influencing the
Township. Second, are the natural features of the Township
which give it a unique character. They are presented in
Chapter 3. Third, are the goals and objectives, presented in
Chapter 4. They provide a road-map for decisions. Fourth, are
the public facilities, existing and future land use and policies
which provide guidance in making future land use and
infrastructure decisions presented in Chapters 5 and 6. Fifth,
Chapter 7 presents information and guidelines on
implementation.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
1-2

�This Plan is presented to assist all elected and appointed
officials when making choices between competing interests by
serving as a guide for decision making. It is anticipated that
this Plan will be consulted in the following situations:

Review of rezonings, variances, and special use permits:
Applications for rezonings, variances, or special use permits
should be evaluated not only in terms of specific zoning
ordinance standards, but also in terms of how well the
proposed action would help attain the goals and objectives of
this Plan, fulfill its policies, and be consistent with the Future
Land Use Map.
Public improvement projects: All future public improvement
projects, including the construction of new facilities, utilities or
buildings, should first be reviewed by the Planning
Commission for consistency with this plan, as provided by
Section 125.32 of PA 168 of 1959. In particular, such projects
should be reviewed to determine consistency with the goals,
objectives and policies in the Plan, and whether such projects
support the planned future land use pattern in the Township,
as set forth in this Plan and the Future Land Use Map.
Review of land subdivision and lot splits: The subdivision of
land and associated lot split activities has a profound impact
upon the character of a community and future public service
needs and tax burdens. This Plan provides policies to assist
the Planning Commission and Township Board regarding
decisions about the appropriateness of proposed subdivisions
and lot splits, and the adequacy of public services to address
the increased demands associated with these subdivisions and
lot splits.
Township stability: This Plan is a strong and visible
statement by the Township and its residents, regarding the
intended future character of the community and strategies to
assure that character. As a formal and tangible document, this
Plan is intended to instill a sense of stability and direction for
township officials, township activities, township residents and
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
1-3

�future inventors in the Township.
How the Plan was Prepared

In mid 1990, Clark Township Planning Officials undertook a
community-wide attitude survey of residents, both year-round
and seasonal, with the objective of identifying, issues,
opportunities and attitudes relating to a variety of topics,
ranging from general appearance of the Township, to interest
in community and cultural events. One of the priorities
identified in that survey, as reflected in responses received
from residents, was the review and update of the Clark
Township Master Plan.
Originally prepared in the 1970's, this Master Plan served as
the general foundation of local planning for approximately 15
years. During this period, no revisions were made to this
document and, as a result, while sections of the Plan are still
applicable to current conditions, a significant portion of the
document is outdated or did not contain a sufficient level of
refinement to support new initiatives or guide the local decision
making process.
In early 1991, several specific Plan amendments were
identified which the planning commission felt were minimum
revisions if the Master Plan was to satisfy both short and long
term Township planning requirements. These included
updating land use maps to reflect changes over time,
(including extension of the sanitary sewers), establishing
guidelines for new development, especially in unique or
sensitive settings, and identifying policies for guiding
development within village centers.

1~

In October 1992, the Clark Township Board and Planning
Commission jointly issued a request for proposals for planning
consultants to update the Clark Township Master Plan.
Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. was selected to update the Plan
in February 1993.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PIAN
1-4

�Phase One of the planning process initiated by PZC began with
the identification of critical trends and conditions facing Clark
Township. Information was generated based upon discussions
with Township officials, a review of the recently completed
community attitude surveys, a separately distributed local
leader survey (summer 1993), and a variety of supplemental
resources.
Concurrent with a general review of the updated trends and
conditions, PZC meet with the Planning Commission,
interested citizens, and Township Board to solicit input on
critical trends and issues, as well as review and refme
proposed Township goals and objectives.
Phase Two of the planning effort began with an examination of
key findings and conclusions from the data collected, including
anticipated future growth and development. Two alternative
future land use patterns were generated and reviewed, drawing
upon the previously established goals and objectives for
guidance in evaluation.
A town meeting was held (with citizens encouraged to attend)
where the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative
was discussed and a preferred choice was made.
At the same time, strategic policies were presented as
refinements to the goals and objectives previously established.
These policies served as the foundation for development of the
preferred Land Use Map and for Plan implementation. The last
phase of the project involved the actual preparation of the
revised Master Plan document, including all text, maps,
charts, tables and other graphics. As with previous phases, a
town meeting was held to encourage broad based community
input, both from Township officials, as well as citizens. A
public hearing was held _ _ _ _ followed by the Township's
adoption of this plan shortly thereafter.
kg\stat1on5 \ word \dark \plan \chap! .doc
6 -9-94

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PIAN
1-5

r~

�CHAPTER 2 - COMMUNITY PROFILE

Introduction
The history of the Great Lakes region is intimately linked with
the Les Cheneaux Islands. The safe harbors of the many
channels between the islands sheltered all the people who
passed through the falls of the St. Mary's River and the Straits
of Mackinac. Through the passage of time, many individuals
were lured by the abundance of natural resources and opted to
settle in the region. Since the latter part of the nineteenth
century, the shores and islands of Clark Township became a
favorite summer resort for the well-to-do of Detroit, Cincinnati,
Toledo, Chicago, and Cleveland. Local commerce was
established in Hessel and Cedarville. Hessel became the
number one center for pleasure boating activities in northern
Michigan as marked by the establishment of one of (Chris
Craft's) the largest dealerships. With the opening of the St.
Lawrence Seaway and the construction of the Mackinac
Bridge, thousands of new tourists from all over North America
discover this beautiful area each year.

Spatial Location
Clark Township occupies the eastern and southern end of
Mackinac County. By road, it can be reached on M-134 east of
I-75 after a ten-mile drive; and also from Pickford, in the
north, on M-129; by boat on Lake Huron at the Hessel or
Cedarville docks; and by plane landing at the Hessel airport.
The Township lies within the area described as T42N, T41N,
and RlW, RlE, and R2E.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MA.STER PLAN
2-1

�Demographics

Population and Density
Clark Township experienced it's most significant populatipn
change between 1940 and 1950 when the number of
individuals nearly doubled. Between 1950 and 1990 Clark
Township's year round population nearly doubled again, rising
97% going from 1,145 to 2,012 (see Table 2-1 and Figure 2-1) .
The population increase in the last decade was smaller at just
over 7%. The range of population changes among local units of
government and the County between 1980 and 1990 can be
seen on Table 2-2. St. Ignace Township had the largest
population increase at just over 32% and Hudson Township
had the greatest decrease at just over 7%. The County overall
experienced about a 5% population increase. In this same time
period, the State experienced only a 0.4% population increase.
Population projections presented in the Clark Township
Facilities Plan prepared in 1987 anticipate that the year-round
population will be about 2,106 in 1997; and 2,280 by the year
2007.
The population of the Township in the 1990 Census includes
only a count of persons in year-round occupied housing units.
If the median household size of the Township is applied to all
seasonal housing units, then seasonal units contribute about
2,840 additional people to the Township's population in the
summer. There are about 1,300 rental units in the Township
in various resorts, motels and hotels. If the median household
size applies to rental units, then another 3,250 persons are
added to the peak summer population. This is a summer
grand total population of about 8,090 persons. This is about
four times higher than the year-round population.
Increase in density affects the community character of an area.
Density is a function of urbanization and urbanization
influences demand for services. In 40 years (1950-1990)
density of year round residents in the Township doubled; going

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-2

�Table 2-1
Clark Township Historic Population
Year
Population
% change
1930
777
1940
793
2.1 %
1950
1,145
44.4%
1960
1,563
36.5%
1970
1,771
13.3%
1980
1,879
6.1 %
1990
2,012
7.1%
Source. U. S. Census Bureau

Figure 2-1
Clark Township Historic Population
2,500
2,000
C:

0

·;;

1,500

«I

:i

C.

0

Q.

1,000
500

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

Year
Source: U.S. Census

Unit
Mackinac County
Bois Blanc Township
Brevort Township

1990 Population
10,674
59
484

Garfield Township
Hendricks Township
Hudson Township
Mackinac Island City
Marquette Township
Moran Township
Newton Township
Portaqe Township
St. Ignace Citv
St. Ignace Township

1,156
161
197
469
550
838
358
890
2568
932

Table 2·2
County Population
1980 Population 1980 • 90 Change
10,178
496
62
-3
451
33
1,206
166
212
479
461
823
354
747
2632
706

-50
-5
-15
-10
89
15
4
143
-64
226

Source: U.S. Census; 1990

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-3

1980 • 90 % Change
4.87%
-4.84%
7.32%
-4.15%
-3.01 %
-7.08%
-2.09%
19.31%
1.82%
1.13%
19.14%
-2.43%
32.01%

�from about 13 persons per square mile to 26 persons per
square mile. Population densities are still relatively low in the
Township, but they are much higher than the County's 1990
density; which was about 10.5 persons per square mile. The
are also much higher than the average in those portions of the
Township which are developed (the southern shoreline). In
contrast, the average density throughout Michigan was about
164 persons per square mile in 1990.
Race and Household
About 10% of the Township's 1990 population were American
Indian; about 0.3% were Asian, and the remainder were white
(89.7%).
There were 792 households in the Township in 1990, about
63% of them were married-couple families and about 24%
were single-person households. The average 1990 household
size in Clark Township (2.5 persons per household) was close
to the County average of 2.49 persons per household.
Housing
In 1990, there were 2,009 housing units in the Township. The
majority of these were classified as seasonal (56%). A smaller,
but still large portion of the County's housing stock is also
seasonal (44%). Comparatively, only about 6% of the State's
housing stock is classified as seasonal.
The majority of housing in the Township is single-family in
nature (97%). About 5% of the housing units (108) are mobile
homes; these are also classified as single family. Only 3% of
the Township's housing stock is in the form of multi-family
units. Single-family housing is the largest consumer of land in
most Michigan communities.
The Township has a high incidence of home ownership. About
80% of all housing units in the Township are owner-occupied
and about 76% of all County housing units are owneroccupied. The state average is lower at 71 % owner occupancy.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-4

�The Township's housing stock is relatively new in that over
49% of it has been built since 1970. Between 1970 and 1979
alone, 771 units were built. Between 1984 and 1991, an
average of 22 new housing units (including single family and
multi-family) per year have gone up in the Township (see Table
2-3 and Figure 2-2). About 80% of these 173 units have been
single-family units.

Year

Table 2·3
Construction Permits Issued for
New Housmg U.
nits
Sinale Family• Multi-Family

1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991

18

Total

16
16

8

21
24
11
26
9
22

2

34
24
21
24
11
28

0

9

0

22

0
0
0

'lndudes mobile homes.
Source: MidJi(}an Slate Housirl() Development Aulhoriry.

Figure 2-2
Construction Permits Issued for New Housing Units
35

30

25

!!!

·e

20

;;;

• Single

0..

0

"'

Family•

mMulti-Family

15

• Total
10

5

1984

1985

1986

1988

1987

1989

1990

Year

*Includes mobile homes
Source: Michigan State Housing Development Authority

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-5

1991

�In 1990, median value of owner-occupied housing in the
Township was $50,600; higher than the County average of
$43,900. Compared to other units within the County, Clark
was third in terms of the value of owner-occupied housing
units; behind only Mackinac Island with a median housing
value of $101,800, and Moran Township with a median
housing value of $52,700. The lowest median housing value in
the County, was $23,800 in Hendricks Township.
Age
Median age in the Township is higher than the County (38.2
years of age vs. 37.1 years of age). The state's median age is
much lower at 32.6 years of age. Higher median ages in both
the County and the Township are due primarily to
concentrations of persons 65 years and older (i.e., retirees). In
the state overall, 11.9% of the population is 65 years and
older; for the county, 17%; and for the Township, 16.8% (see
Table 2-4).
For comparative purposes, differences in median age and the
percentage of persons 65 years and older is highly variable

Table 2-4
Median Age
1980

State of Michigan
Mackinac County
Clark Township

1990

28.80
32 .30
34.80

;::,ource: u . ;::,. L:ensus 1-'opulatJon

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-6

32.60
37.10
38.20

r"'\

t"'i'

�I

throughout the County. The range in median age runs from a
low of 31 .6 years of age in St. Ignace Township to a high of
56.7 years of age in Bois Blanc Township. Likewise, the
percentage of persons 6 5 years and over ranges from a low of ·
7.7% in Mackinaw Island City to 30.5% in Bois Blanc
Township.
The Township's higher median age in light of a slightly lower
percentage of persons 65 and over than the County may be
due to the presence of "baby boomers" and preretirement aged
persons. Nearly 25% of the Township's population was
between 45 and 64 years old in 1990. Just over 25°/c&gt; of the
population was 18 years of age or under.
Education
Overall, Clark Township residents have a higher percentage of
high school graduates than the County and the State. As of
1990; 77 .4% of the Township's population were high school
graduates or higher, the State's figure was 76.8%. However,
the state had a higher percentage of persons with a Bachelors
degree or higher at 17 .4°/o vs. the Township figure of 11.5%.
The County had lower figures than the state and Township
with 71.4% of the population being high school graduates or
higher and 10.4% with a Bachelor's degree or higher.
School Enrollment
Enrollment in the Les Cheneaux School District generally
declined between 1970 and 1993. In 1970 the system (K- 12)
had 571 students. In 1990 it was down about 39% to 410
students. In 1993, enrollments rose to 433 students,
representing about a 6% increase. A reduction in the number
of school-aged children was a common trend in Michigan in
the late 1970s through most of the 1980s due to children born
toward the end of the post WWII "baby-boom" passing through
K- 12 systems. In recent years, there has been in an increase
in the percentage of children under 5 years old in Michigan,
which is beginning to be reflected in more recent school
enrollment data.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-7

�•

Economy
There are two major economic factors in the local economy, 1)
limestone operations by Michigan Limestone Corporation
which employs 125 individuals and 2) recreation and resort
oriented economic activities. Lumbering and other woodrelated operations have also some economic significance.
Overall, economic growth has been somewhat slow during the
last ten years, which is comparable to the national growth
trend.
Tourism
Recreation associated with Great Lake amenities have a
profound impact on Mackinac County, and Clark Township.
Typically, true impacts of tourism are difficult to gauge, but
there is some existing data which can present a general picture
of tourism impact.
According to the Michigan Travel Bureau, in 1990 Mackinac
County was 14th of 83 counties in tourism-related
expenditures, with $94 million spent. This money generated an
estimated $23 million additional in payrolls. During the
summer season much of the seasonal labor is imported to the
County, especially for those tourist-related businesses on
Mackinac Island and in or near the Mackinac Straits.
In 1983, the Travel, Tourism and Recreation Resource Center
at Michigan State University estimated the supply of Great
Lakes recreational marina facilities. At that time, Mackinac
County had some 41 marinas with a total of about 560 slips.
Mackinac County provided well over one-quarter of all Great
Lakes slips found in the Upper Peninsula (28%). Mackinac
County provided over three times the number of marina slips
than Grand Traverse County did at that same time. Further, in
1989, approximately 2,800 pleasure watercraft were registered
to County residents and 92 boats were registered as
commercial craft. Since about 70% of the pleasure craft were
only 12-15. 9 feet long, it may be surmised that many of the

CLARK TOWNSJm&gt; MASTER PLAN
2-8

�larger pleasure craft frequenting the area are registered to
tourists from other counties.
Fishing is another indicator of water-related recreational
activity. In 1989, the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources recorded 6,872 annual fishing licenses purchased in
Mackinac County. The majority of the annual fishing licenses
were purchased by nonresidents (57%; or 3,924).
Public Finance
Between 1982 and 1991, the total County tax rate increased
by 18.5%. In that same time period the Township tax rate
increased by 125%, or over two-fold (see Table 2-5). County
and school rates increase by 23% and 11 %, respectively. The
Township's significant tax increase in just nine years is
indicative of a Township under pressure to provide public
services--services spurred by new development (urbanization).

Table 2-5
Clark Township Tax Levy
County Tax
Rate

1982
1984
1986
1988
1991

4.35
4.49
4.50

Township
Tax Rate
1.80
1.87

2.85
3.84
4.06

4.50
5.36

School Tax
Rate

28.50
29.00
28.68
29.68
31.64

Source: Mtchtgan State Department of Treasury
Annual Tax Levy Reports.

Shifts in state equalized value (SEV) also indicate increased
development. In the span of 10 years, those lands classified as
residential increased in value by 61 % (see Figure 2-3). Lands
classified as commercial increased in value by 63%.
Conversely, natural resource-based lands, which are
essentially undeveloped increased a comparatively small
amount. Agricultural lands increased in value by 11 % and
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-9

�timber lands increased in value by only 2%. The smaller gain
in value for these lands may be due in part to their conversion
to other uses (e.g., commercial and residential). If less land is
in each respective category, its rate of increase would be
affected. New growth in the Township has not increased
industrial SEV significantly. It grew by 11 % in ten years.
Overall, total SEV in the Township increased by 49% (see
Table 2-6). Perhaps more significant than the percentage
change in any SEV category is the change in proportion of total
SEV it represents over time. In 1982, residential SEV
represented 71 % of total SEV in the Township, by 1992 it
represented a larger proportion; comprising 76% of the total
tax base. Conversely, in 1982, timber lands represented 6% of
total SEV; and even though total value was higher in 1992, it
represented a smaller proportion of total SEV at 4%.
Figure 2-3
Clark Township
State Equalized Value Residential

45,000,000
40,000,000

.

a)
:)

-.;

&gt;

"'O

GI

.!:!
-.;
:)
r::r

35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000

w

~

15,000,000

Cl

;;;

10,000,000
5,000,000
0

1982

1984

1986

Source: Michigan State Department of Treasury Annual

1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992

Aaricultural
264,250
268,485
253,060
246,828
288,315
293,330

1988

1990

1992

Re/f~r

Table 2-6
Clark Township State Equalized Values
Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover
3,061,930
2,379,800 26,364,317
2,402,561
3,054,943
2,371,345 27,016,034
2,234,890
3,510,726
2,181,715
2,372,505 29,154,884
3,242,168
2,372,145 31,765,170
2,221,640
4,591,485
2,636,710 39,798,666
2,508,720
4,992,495
2,636,710 42,428,217
2,459,870

Source: M1ctugan State Department of Treasury Annual Reports.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-10

Total
37,303,807
37,832,571
40,142,453
42,451,236
52,919,121
55,768,532

�Labor Force and Employment
Of the 1,570 persons 16 years and over in the Township, about
58% (906) of them are in the labor force. At the time of the
1990 Census, 13.7% of the labor force was unemployed. The
County had a higher figure of 15.7% and the state had a lower
figure of 8.2%. The top five occupations in 1990 among Clark
Township workers are listed in Table 2-7.
The top five occupations represented 66% of the labor force.
While occupation refers to the type of work a person does,
industry refers to that sector of the economy which employs
them. The top five industries in 1990 that provided jobs to
Township workers are listed in Table 2-8.
Table 2-7
CLARK TOWNSHIP TOP FIVE OCCUPATIONS
%of
Township
Occupations
Workers
Precision Production, Craft and Repair
17%
Service, Except Protective and
Household
15%
Administrative Support, Including
Clerical
12%
Executive, Administrative and
Managerial Occupation
11%
Sales
11%
Table 2-8
CLARK TOWNSHIP
TOP FIVE INDUSTRIES

% of Township
Industries
Retail Trade
Construction
Education Service
Manufacturing
Personal Services

Workers
24%
13%
10%
10%
7%

The top five industries employed 64% of the work force. Other
significant industries represented included public
administration, mining, and health services.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-11

�I

II

Income
There are four common measurements of income in the
Census; median household income; median family income;
median income of nonfamily households, and per capita
income. Household income figures include all households in a
community, no matter what their composition. Family income
is a subset of all households. Nonfamily households is the
other subset of all households and includes single-person
households, and households with unrelated individuals living
together. Per capita income distributes all income among each
individual in a community (non-workers, like children
included).
In all cases, Clark Township's income figures are lower than
state averages, yet higher than county averages (see Table 2-9) .
It should be noted that while income levels may be lower than
state averages, so too are housing values. In 1990, the median
value of housing in the state was $60,600 compared to the
median value of $50,600 for housing in Clark Township.

Table 2-9
Median Income Levels - 1990
State
Township
County
All households
$31,020
$20,250
$19,397
Family households
$36,652
$24,432
$23,097
Nonfamily households
$16,690
$12, 177
$10,469
Per capita
$9,987
$9,751
_ _ _ _ _ _,...__$14,154
_ _.....1,,_ _
...;__.,___.;..__,1

Poverty levels in the Township are generally lower than state
and county figures. In 1990, 11. 7% of the entire population of
Clark Township was below poverty level; 16.4% of the county
population and 13.1 % of the state's population was below
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-12

�poverty level. Poverty levels for subsectors of the population,
however were much higher, with some of them greater than
state and county figures (see Table 2-10).
Two figures that bear special focus here are the percentage of
children under five and female-householder (i.e., single-parent)
families that are in poverty. The numbers are high--alarmingly
so throughout the State. Although Clark Township has lower
poverty figures for the population overall and for most
subsectors of the population, its poverty figures are higher
than state and county averages for children under 5 and
female, single-parent households.

Table 2-10
Poverty Levels
Subsectors of the Population
Percent in Poverty - 1990
State
Township
Persons 65 years and older
10.8%
7.9%
Unrelated individuals
25.9%
20.1%
Children 5-1 7 years of age
16.7%
14.1 %
Children under 5 years of age
22.1%
26.5%
Female householder families
35.8%
36.2%

kg\ stations:\ word \clark\plan \chap2.doc
6-13-94

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
2-13

County
14.1 %
31.4%
20.6%
25.2%
39.3%

�CHAPTER 3 - NATURAL FEATURES

Introduction
In this chapter, natural features are described as a subset of
the natural environment. In basic terms these features are
topography, geology, soil, water and vegetation. They are
readily identifiable and establish the most significant element
of community character. Natural features are also uniquely
integrated into the complex web of all natural processes which
are responsible for providing a clean and health environment.
In this regard the natural features which occupy the
approximately 79.35 square mile land area of the Township are
presented as essential base information for subsequent
chapters of the Plan.
Coastal and Surface Water Resources
The most striking feature of the Township is its intricate
shoreline of bays, peninsula's and the Les Cheneaux chain of
some 25 islands. The Township's 176 miles of coast has
diverse characteristics providing beaches, bays, harbors, and
marshes. Several Lake Huron reefs are off the Township's
coastline including Pomery, Tobin, Martin, Surveyors and
Beaver Tail.
Excluding Lake Huron, surface water area in the Township is
relatively small (about 162 acres). Leach, Bay City, Pollock,
Mud, and Bass Cove Lakes, and a few small, unnamed lakes
represent the primary bulk of inland surface water in Clark
Township. Bass Cove Lake is on La Salle Island. Prentiss,
McKay, Flowers, Pearson, Steele, Mackinac and Law Creeks
run primarily in a southeasterly direction and provide drainage
directly to Lake Huron.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-1

�Topography
The topographic characteristics of an area influence drainage,
erosion and construction limitations. Topography also
influences community character by providing scenic relief and
local landmarks. In general, topography in the Township can
be classified as level to gently rolling with slopes of less than
10% (see Map 3-1). There are some ridges that present scenic
features including Peeka-Boo hill west of Pearson Creek and
Rockview Lookout Tower area near Poglese and Chard Roads.
Several hills and ridges throughout the Township, like the
creeks, are generally angled in a southeasterly direction and
were formed by the scouring action of ancient glacial recession.
In general, the Township's land rises from the lakeshore. The
approximate mean elevation of Lake Huron is 580 feet.
Elevations adjacent to Lake Huron range from about 590 feet
to about 650 feet. Further inland elevations generally rise
reaching a maximum of 950 feet in the northwest half of the
Township (the Rockview Lookout area). Islands and peninsulas
form gentle mounds with high points that reach only about 5060 feet above the Lake Huron water level.

Geology
The geology of the Township reveals that more than half of its
area has bedrock within ten feet of the surface. Generally, if
bedrock is within ten feet of the surface, the overlying land is
considered unsuitable for residential, commercial, and
industrial development, particularly where public sewer and
water facilities are not available. Areas with shallow bedrock
have severe limitations for on-site sewage disposal systems.
Most of the bedrock which lies under the Township is known
as Paleozoic rock, which consists of limestone or engadine
dolomite. Portions of these deposits are being mined in the
Township (see Map 3-2).

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-2

�a:

a:

:::c

a.

::,

...z
0

::)

...:z
0

0:::

:&gt;

Cl)

0

(.,)

0
(.,)

Zo

~

0

~

3: ...

0

T"""

I

z

c..

C
%

0~

('(')

~ C

~

I- u

z

&lt;

...
..,a:
...
&lt;
%

...

rn

"'"'..,

et: z

&lt; :3
..J

.,

~

..,
a:

..J

u

DI

()

,

.
,................. ......... .....................................................
r
ii

I

~~-~ \ 1:_ ·--

i

•

:I -· --

,.~• •

~ .f

-_ I
~
=-·
~-~ ·- ~;-. .;. - -.-:.
i -_- --., ·, .L,,
¥::

'-

.

11

~

q•

i
-

..

I

·•

I

= .~

- ~ :t __r
- --a.~.. . .

!Jl.-!

,!1,

~-.

_,

l -;-,,,
r
. ,,·----

:--·--

=

=

-~-.

·,

~

•.

'

=

=

"

::

i

-

...
~

=
=

CLARK

TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-3

I

I

�I))))

~

-!' ······ ······-r~J.f,.11'!_._
I

•

I

::

II

.

;

~

-·+ -

,1···-·•"''' ...l...

I

I

"I
-

...

lrl . . . . ..... .

CLARK TOWNSHIP

--""

'

i

GEOLOGY

I

Map 3-2

i
d
~

en

i ij

!~
~

~

'

-

BEDROCK AT OR NEAR SURFACE

D

BEDROCK 10 FT . BEYOND SURFACE

�I

Soils
Soils are an essential part of the area's natural resources and.
are important in determining building foundation strength,
effectiveness of septic tank sewage disposal, plant fertility,
erosion hazards, and drainage conditions. All of these factors
are crucial in determining the nature and extent of
development that should occur within the Township.
A general soils survey, which was done during the 1920's, is
the only reliable soils information available for the Township.
Soil analysis presented in the 1970's Master Plan indicates
that the majority of the land in the Township has severe
limitations for agriculture, commercial forestry and on-site
septic systems. The original soil survey indicates that most of
the area in the Township has stony (calcareous) soils except
the northwest corner of the Township, where soils are more
sandy. The northwest four sections of the Township have heavy
blue clays. There are two other very small areas which have
bedrock types of soils, these are the areas with limestone
deposits (see Map 3-3).

Wetlands and Drainage Ways
Clark Township has a significant amount of wetland. Most of
the wetland areas of the Township consist of lowland conifers
and low lying wetland predominate with hydric soils. The
presence of wetland can be found scattered throughout Clark
Township. Most may not be covered with water year round, but
will show the tell tales signs of a wetland habitat by the
presence of wetland vegetation and hydric soils. Some of the
wetlands in Clark Township are interconnected or contiguous,
providing a distinctive network of "natural" areas throughout
the Township. Wetlands have traditionally been regarded as
wastelands-sources of mosquitoes, flies and unpleasant
odors. Presently wetlands are viewed as a valuable resource
responsible for flood control, as habitat for wildlife, and as
aesthetic resources contributing to the natural beauty of
watercourses and lakes (see Map 3-4). Currently, wetland in the
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-5

�t

t

CLARK TOWNSHIP
GENERAL SOILS
~OtklU

NO

lfD

"''::·:· ~·:·:c:r.:::~ ::-:-r.:: :~

.. ~~ ~:!!::'.!iii:~ ;~~!~!'. !:

Map 3-3

., .... tsl ·····
•····· ,········
•·•···1. .
···········
. . . :::::::::::: 1::::::

., D
F::::7
~

a

e

-

~

~

~
~

~

l,..
I

:x:
....

.,_"'.:l

;~
~

~
~
"'.:l

s:

&lt;

'

Mucks &amp; Wet Course Sands
Sandy Soils
Stony Soils "Calcareous II
Bedrock Soils

�A

:-c
en
C.

z u,
3: ~
o&lt;

Q_

E
l1l
Vl

I
rJJ

,-i

Ill

I

·rl

_J

&gt;

0
(/)

.µ
.µ

l1l

"O

l

Ill

"O

Ol

"O

&gt;-

I

ii)

&gt;

a

-

0

-,-{

0

&lt;(
..J
(J

l1l
,-i

-,-{

I-~
~ ~
D! &gt;

"O
C

Ill

Vl
Ill

.Y

O
0

l1l

3:

..J

&amp;

/

i

t

~

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3.7

'

�Township is protected by federal and state laws, and a local
Township regulation.
Vegetative Cover
The majority of the Township is under forest cover. The eastern
part is composed primarily of second growth mixed hardwoods;
and, the western part, primarily of cedars, other conifers and
scrub growth. Much of the forested areas of the Township are
not of commercial grade.
Many of the islands are heavily forested as are wetland areas
adjacent to creeks and intermittent streams. Extensive areas of
wetlands and hydric soils are dispersed throughout the
Township (see Map 3-5).
Most of the waterfront areas of the islands are identified as
swampy and low lying. There are no areas classified as
floodplains in the Township.
Sensitive Areas
Over the past few years, the Nature Conservancy has
conducted an environmental survey in Clark Township. This
survey contains an inventory of those plant species which are
either endangered or are in one way or another under attack
by competitive forces. The majority of these sites are wetlands
and have been depicted with the aid of U.S. Fish and Wildlife
these areas in the hope that their biological diversity will be
preserved. Prudent management of these sensitive area will
ensure the preservation of these natural habitats.
Four levels of environmentally sensitive area are shown on Map
3-6: most sensitive, very sensitive, sensitive and least sensitive.
They correspond to levels 1 through 4 of the following
respective definitions. They are: (see Map 3-6).
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-8

�-:a.c

0:::

(/)W

z&gt;

8
QC
3:

t- ~
~ en

~~

&lt;( 0
...J u.
(.)

LO
I

('f)

C.

co

~

-0
C

-0
C

ro

ro

M

M

3

Q.

0

:J

_J

-0

-0

II)

II)

1J
0

1J
0
0
3

0

3

lSJB
/

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-9

�a. &gt;:::c _.
_.
en &lt; &lt;wen
z zI- 0:::
31: w &lt;

-

0~ w
I- z &gt;

~~

~

-enz

a::s;
w
&lt;z en
-' w

0

QJ

(0
I

(")

C.

ro

~

&gt;
• rl
.µ

.µ

• rl

• rl

l/l

l/l

C

QJ

VI
.µ
l/l
0

:E

QJ

&gt;

QJ

&gt;
• rl
C

QJ

VI

&gt;c..
QJ

&gt;

•rl

.µ

• rl

QJ

&gt;
• rl

.µ

• rl

l/l

C

QJ

VI
.µ

l/l

l/l

QJ

QJ
_J

C

VI

~ ~UIHIJ

Ill

•

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-10

�Level 1

The most pristine habitats; those containing high
concentrations of globally important biological
diversity, or the best remaining, most productive
wetlands useful to fish spawning, water purification,
and other valuable attributes.

Level 2

Sites which play a critical role in protecting
environmental health or contain high concentrations
of statewide important biological diversity,

Level 3

Sites which play a fundamental role in protecting
environmental health.

Level 4

These areas represent the other, primarily
terrestrial, natural and developed areas of the
Township. Any future development or land use of
these areas should evaluate impacts on the higherranked sensitive areas as well as the impact on the
natural values of the site itself (such as water and
air pollution mitigation, recreation, aesthetics, etc.).
A preferred strategy is to concentrate development
in small areas (especially those already developed)
and leave larger areas in low intensity uses such as
selective forestry and recreation.

Environmental Quality Issues
Environmental quality in the context of this discussion focuses
on the natural environment, namely water quality, aquatic and
terrestrial habitat, fisheries and wildlife populations, and
human impacts upon them. A variety of human activities, most
of them associated directly or indirectly with land use, impact
environmental quality. Environmental quality is degraded
primarily by 1) the introduction of pollutants, 2) the alteration
of natural processes (e.g., watershed functions) and; 3) the
destruction of aquatic or terrestrial habitat.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-11

�Pollutants

Pollutants are usually byproducts of human activity. They are
generally transported and distributed via air or water.
Contributors of pollutants include municipal and industrial
wastewater treatment discharges, residential, commercial and
agricultural nonpoint runoff, individual septic systems, soil
sediment carried in stormwater runoff, waste disposal sites,
leaking storage tanks, toxic waste spills, waste injection wells
and atmospheric deposition.
Municipal sewage waste is typically discharged to receiving
waters via a pipe, ditch or channel (point source). Non point
pollutants come from dispersed sources (e.g., pavement runoff,
mining activities, construction sites, agricultural fields, faulty
septic systems) and are transported via air, groundwater
and/ or stormwater runoff to receiving water bodies. Pollutants
are usually placed in one of four general categories; nutrients,
sediments, toxics and pathogens.
Plant nutrients, primarily nitrogen and phosphorus, that enter
surface waters in concentrated levels can drastically alter
natural ecological processes by stimulating booms in aquatic
plant growth. Such booms choke surface waters with weeds
and algae, deplete oxygen levels, and can smother certain
species of aquatic organisms; changing the ecological
composition of water habitat.
Since there is limited agricultural activity in the Township, the
majority of nutrient loads to Township waters are likely to
come from overuse of commercial fertilizers in residential and
commercial development and from faulty septic systems.
Soil Erosion

Soil erosion and sedimentation are a major source of pollution
to Michigan waterways. Stormwater runoff washes soil from
unprotected ground and carries it to receiving waters. As the
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-12

�soil travels in runoff it picks up additional pollutants (oils,
pesticides, etc.). Eventually, eroded soil settles surface waters
as sediment. Sediment: 1) damages the ability of the waterway
to serve its natural functions by eroding channels, depleting
oxygen and smothering habitat; 2) effects navigability and
recreational uses of surface waters, and; 3) clogs
drainageways, increasing public costs and chances of flooding.
Because of its relatively high percentage of forest cover, most of
the Township's sandy or gravely soils are protected from
excessive runoff and erosion. Forest cover slows runoff
velocities and, therefore, its damaging effects. The Township
should take measures to assure the retention of vegetative
cover to protect against future soil erosion and sedimentation.

Toxic Substances
A toxic substance is defined as a substance which can cause
death, disease, behavioral abnormalities, cancer, genetic
mutations, physiological or reproductive malfunctions or
physical deformities in any organism or its offspring, or which
can become poisonous after concentration in the food chain or
in combination with other substances. Many toxics are
persistent -i n that they do not readily break down. Toxics can
originate from industrial and commercial processes, leaking
underground storage tanks, faulty landfills, or the misuse of
certain household products.
Pathogens (disease-causing bacteria, viruses or parasites)
generally originate from human or animal waste which enter
surface or groundwater through leaching and/ or runoff. The
primary source for pathogen contamination in the Township is
via faulty septic systems.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-13

�Alteration of Natural Processes

A brief overview of the natural processes of an environment
can best be explained at the watershed level. A watershed is
that land area that drains into a lake, river, or creek system.
Although it is not completely isolated, a watershed is a rather
self-contained biological unit. Its significant in that
environmental quality is often overlooked in the arena of
human activity. Very briefly, components of a watershed and
their relative functions are:
Flowing water - Microorganisms help breakdown

pollutants through natural biological processes. Water is
aerated as it travels downstream over channel
obstructions. Habitat is provided to many useful aquatic
species which help feed terrestrial organisms.
_
Drainageways - Drainageways convey stormwater and
meltwater to surface waters, allowing sediment and other
pollutants to settle out prior to discharge into surface
water.
Wetlands - Wetlands provide a buffer for flooding by
storing stormwaters. Silt and sediment settle or filter out
before discharge into a lake or stream. Diverse habitat is
also provided for fish and wildlife. Wetlands serve as
breeding ground for many species of fish, insects and
waterfowl.
Groundwater - Groundwater adds to the base flow of
surface waters during the dry season, stabilizing micro
ecosystems. It also very often is the source for domestic
water consumption.
Vegetation - Vegetation stabilizes soils, preventing erosion
and sedimentation. Slows the velocity of stormwater and
its damaging effects. Provides cover to adjacent streams
which keeps water temperature down (this is especially
important in trout streams).
Soils - Soils provide a medium and nutrients for
vegetation.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-14

�Human Intervention

Human activity in the environment can greatly disrupt the
natural processes found in a watershed. Various land uses
have their own brand of impacts on the watershed, water
quality, and ultimately, environmental quality:
New construction sites contribute sediment to surface waters.
Once developed, stormwater flows over impervious surfaces
(rooftops, parking areas, roadways and sidewalks) picking up
soil, dust, gas, oil, road salt, and other residues, which are
quickly transported into drains, streams, wetlands, and lakes.
Residential uses can contribute fertilizers and pesticides to
surface waters. Improper disposal of hazardous wastes (e.g.,
oils and solvents) can contribute to water quality degradation.
Malfunctioning septic systems can degrade both surface and
groundwater quality. Septic systems can release toxics into
groundwater. Chemical solvents are not broken down the same
way sewage is broken down (bacterially). Many chemical
solvents are able to pass though a septic system and soils in
their original state. Mown lawns provide much less buffering
for stormwater than natural vegetation does. Impervious
surfaces in residential development also cany residues to
surface waters.
Agriculture introduces nutrients, pesticides, and sediment
which flow as runoff into surface waters, some pollutants also
reach groundwater. Bulk storage of animal manure and farm
chemicals, and underground and above ground fuel storage
tanks are examples of point source threats. There is limited
agricultural activity in the Township, so issues associated with
agricultural pollution are not as acute as they are in other
areas of the state.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-15

�Act 307 Sites

307 sites are parcels of known soils or groundwater pollution ..
Those land use activities that have the highest risk of
becoming 307 sites are those that generate, use, store and
dispose of hazardous substances. These are generally private
commercial and industrial operations, but public facilities can
have operations which use hazardous substances. Many
commonly used materials are hazardous substances including
petroleum-based products, chemicals, solvents, acids and
salts. Hazardous waste generators must be registered with the
Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). The Township hosts
three facilities registered with the MDNR; an AT&amp;T relay
station on M-134; which generates nonhazardous industrial
waste; Michigan Limestone, which is classified as a small
quantity generator and, a Michigan Department of
Transportation facility on County 124, which is classified as a
large generator.
There are two sites of known environmental contamination in
the County identified under P.A. 307 of 1982, the Michigan
Environmental Response Act. Neither of the identified sites are
in Clark Township. There are only 12 hazardous waste
generators in the County.
Underground storage tanks can also pose threats to
groundwater quality. According to the Michigan State
University Institute for Water Research, "a leakage rate of two
drops per second can result in the loss of up to 500 gallons of
fuel per year and can contaminate up to 500 million gallons of
water to the level where odor and taste make it unacceptable for
drinking". In Michigan, underground storage tanks are
registered with the Michigan State Police, Fire Marshal's
Division. Although the existing data base does not have
township-specific data it can be searched by mailing address.
As of July, 1993 there were 37 facilities with a total of 77 tanks
registered to the Cedarville/Hessel area. Of these; 16 facilities
are active and 38 tanks are active--less than half of all area
tanks and facilities recorded with the state.
kg \ stations: \ word \ cl ark \ plan\ chap3.doc

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
3-16

�CHAPTER 4 - COMMUNITY GOALS,
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Introduction
The issues, and likewise; the goals and objectives that follow
are derived from: 1) an analysis of present conditions; 2) a
community-wide attitude survey, performed by the Township
in 1991 and 3) a leadership survey in the summer of 1993,
performed by the Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. The issues,
goals and objectives, as presented in this draft, are not in any
particular order with respect to their importance or relative
priority to the Township. Future iterations of this material,
however, may include a prioritization of objectives.
The Purpose of Goals and Objectives
The purpose for developing goals and objectives is to create a
set of future oriented statements that can help guide land use
and infrastructure decisions. They serve as a set of guidelines
against which the validity of land use proposals, plans and
policies can be measured. Goals and objectives are critical
components within the planning process because they define
the collective desires of the community.
Defining Goals
Goals serve as target statements describing the desired future
physical, social and political environment of the community.
Not all goals are necessarily on the same time line. Some goals
can be reached sooner than others, while still others require
special preparation and management to be fully achieved. It is
the intent of this Plan to establish some goals that the
community will achieve over the life of this Plan and also to set
some goals that reach beyond.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-1

�Defining Objectives
Objectives are statements that define how a goal is to be
achieved. Often multiple objectives are attached to the
attainment of a single goal. Because there are often multiple
ways to achieve a goal, objectives often explore every
opportunity that would assist in the attainment of the goal
both within and outside of a community's resources. Objectives
must be real, obtainable and sound. In simple terms objectives
must be "do-able".

Economic Development
Goal statement: Promote diverse, high quality sustainable
economic development in the Township.

Objective: Work with economic development agencies and the
Chamber of Commerce to attract new jobs with incomes
sufficient to support a family.
Objective: Work with the school system and appropriate
social, business and service groups to improve skill
development and employment opportunities for youth
Objective: Work with area merchants to tie shops and
recreational facilities together with plantings, a boardwalk and
other pedestrian-oriented facilities.
Objective: Work more closely with the local Chippewa Indian
community to develop new economic opportunities in the
Township.
Objective: Support area merchants in the expansion of fall
and winter tourism. Also assist in the expansion of summer
services (e.g., expanded store hours, coordinated promotional
activities, a common business theme, welcome center).

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-2

�Land Use
Goal statement: Manage renewable resources and develop
other land in an environmentally and economically sustainable
manner for the benefit of present and.future generations.
Objective: Develop and maintain a database and maps
identifying environmentally sensitive areas.
Objective: Ensure environmentally sensitive areas are
protected from unsound development.
Objective: Annually review and update the master plan and
land use regulations to keep the planning focus up-to-date.
Objective: Coordinate all land use controls to prevent
duplication and unnecessary "red tape".
Objective: Implement and consistently enforce all adopted
land use regulations.
Community Character
Goal statement: Retain the natural coastal heritage of the
Township, its sensitive naturalfeatures and its woodlands as a
central feature of the rural character of the Township.
Objective: Promote new development and redevelopment
which is of similar scale and character as the existing, smallscale, cottage-like development found throughout most of the
Township.
Objective: Limit building heights, particularly along waterfront
areas.
Objective: Protect scenic views throughout the Township,
particularly at high points and near coastal areas.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-3

�Q

Objective: Require underground utilities in all new subdivision
development and on multiple lot redevelopment efforts.
Objective: Develop sign regulations that minimize clutter,
confusion and aesthetic degradation while permitting
reasonable opportunities for announcement of products and
services available in the Township.
Objective: Increase the amount of formal plantings, including
unique arrangements in character with the community, (e.g.,
wildflower plantings).
Objective: Institute commercial facade guidelines for area
businesses with support from the area Chamber of Commerce.
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Goal statement: Preserve and protect natural habitat and
biologic.functions in the watersheds of the Township.
Objective: Include special measures to preserve the
environmental integrity of Township coastal areas and the Les
Cheneaux Islands in local development regulations.
Objective: Investigate, enact guidelines for and encourage the
use of creatively designed development which retain open
areas, indigenous vegetation and other natural features.
Objective: Offer development incentives (probably in the form
of higher density) to persons using creative design concepts
permitted by the Township.
Objective: Enact more detailed and encompassing vegetation
buffering requirements as part of the zoning ordinance.
Objective: Protect unique and large stands of trees along
coastal areas, waterways and urbanizing areas.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-4

�Objective: Institute measures through site plan review and
other land use control techniques that help prevent surface
and ground water pollution.
Objective: Limit the density of development relying on on-site
septic systems in areas not served by public sewer.
Objective: Protect groundwater quality via a septic system
maintenance program and through appropriate site plan
review standards for those developments that use or sell toxic
or hazardous substances.
Objective: Retain indigenous vegetation on developing and
developed sites to protect against excessive runoff, soil erosion
and sedimentation.
Objective: Engage in a community-wide stormwater
management program that minimizes the use of man-made
drainage systems by reducing disturbances to natural
drainageways and by retaining natural floodplain and wetland
areas for their stormwater retention capabilities.
Objective: Investigate the potential of providing a public water
system when the demonstrated need is present and adequate
financing is available.
Objective: Ensure fish cleaning and proper waste disposal
areas are provided near docking and landing areas.
Community Services and Infrastructure
Goal Statement: Provide economically and geographically
efficient public services to Township residents in line with the
rural character of the Township.
Objective: Continue a strict urban services district policy for
the provision of public services in the Cedarville/Hessel areas.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-5

�Objective: Develop a capital improvements program and
budgeting process for new capital facilities at least six years
into the future.
Objective: Work with the County Health Department and
Department of Public works on designing a better island
rubbish pick-up program which may include trash
compaction.
Objective: Work with the County Road Commission and
Michigan Department of Transportation to investigate the need
for a traffic signal at the intersection of M-134 and M-129.
Objective: Investigate the feasibility of upgrading road
shoulders for bicycle, roller blade and pedestrian use.
Objective: Schedule and budget rehabilitation of the existing
Township Hall.
Housing
Goal Statement: Provide safe, decent and affordable housing
for current and.future residents of the Township.
Objective: Work with the Michigan Department of Commerce
to promote the use of their housing rehabilitation programs by
citizens in need across the Township.
Objective: Investigate the need for a Township Housing
Commission.
Social Needs
Goal statement: Help existing human service agencies meet
human service and housing needs of residents of the Township.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-6

�Objective: Assist in the development of a community directory
of local, county and state government agencies, churches,
charitable and civic organizations to improve communication, .
service provision and community awareness of area services.
Public Safety
Goal Statement: Improve local development regulations to
minimize public safety problems associated with new
development and enhance as necessary, local public safety
programs.
Objective: Regulate the development of private roads to
ensure safe access.
Objective: Prevent the proliferation of strip development along
the highway with a special emphasis on ensuring adequate
driveway spacing.
Objective: Prevent the development of land-locked parcels by
monitoring lot splits through locally instituted lot split
regulations.
Objective: Enact site plan review standards in the zoning
ordinance that address access control and other public safety
concerns.
Objective: Improve fire protection and police protection
programs as the need is identified and financial resources are
available.
Recreational and Cultural Opportunities
Goal statement: Provide a variety of cultural and recreational
opportunities to residents of the Township no matter what their
age or physical limitations.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-7

�Objective: Provide expanded outdoor recreational
opportunities which focus on and protect the unique natural
resources of the Township (i.e., islands, coastal areas,
wetlands).
Objective: Work with interested conservation groups to protect
coastal amenities.
Objective: Increase non-boating public access to Lake Huron
and the shoreline.
Objective: Increase boating facilities in or near Hessel and
Cedarville.
Objective: Appoint a formal recreation board to assist with
facilities planning and events programming in the Township.
Objective: Increase picnicking areas on the islands and
shoreline.
Objective: Develop a formal bicycle path that ties together
Township amenities; e.g., Hessel and Cedarville, state and
federal recreational facilities and the islands/coastal areas.
Objective: Develop swimming beaches in the Les Cheneaux
Area.
Objective: Investigate the use of road ends for public access to
Lake Huron.
Objective: Investigate the need for public restrooms and
existing or future recreational facilities.
Objective: Develop expanded game facilities at public facilities
(e.g., horseshoes, volleyball courts, rollerblade/skateboarding
areas).

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-8

�Objective: Strengthen and develop facilities to support special
community events, such as; all-season festivals, plays, antique
boat shows, band concerts and cultural arts.
Objective: Investigate adaptive reuse of appropriate existing
structures for recreational and cultural events.
Objective: Concentrate additional attention on the adequacy
of youth activities in the Township. Involve a cross-section of
interest groups to effectively address the issue.
Objective: Work with the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources to develop a stronger sport fishery in the Township.
Objective: Work with authorities to address water safety and
boating issues.
Objective: Work to enhance and protect historic sites in the
Township.
Objective: Work with the Historical Association to identify and
register historic buildings and sites as appropriate.
Objective: Require developers to submit site plans and project
descriptions to the state historic preservation officer for
assessment the site's possible archaeological significance.
Objective: Work with community groups like the Historical
Association, Island Association and the Chamber of Commerce
to coordinate and expand recreational and cultural activities.
kg\stat1on5:\word\clark\plan\chap4.doc
6 -9 -94

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
4-9

''

�CHAPTER 5 - PUBLIC SERVICES, FACILITIES AND
TRANSPORTATION

Introduction
This chapter reviews existing and planned public facilities,
services, and transportation systems in Clark Township. Public
services and related infrastructure includes sewage disposal,
water service, fire and police protection, recreational and
cultural facilities. Transportation relates to various
classifications and types of roads within the Township.
The intent of this chapter is to provide a strategy where public
services and transportation systems are delivered in tandem
with development activity so that land development occurs
harmoniously with adjacent lands and in a manner that is
consistent with public's ability to provide needed public
facilities. A description of each service and system is provided
below.

Sewage Treatment
Until recently, only limited sewer service was available in the
Township. The first sewer system in Clark Township was
constructed in 1972, serving only the Village of Cedarville. The
initial design combined gravity flow and pressurization systems
and consisted of two pump stations, two lagoons and a spray
irrigation facility. Pond leakage, lack of an adequate discharge
system, unfavorable conditions for on-site sewage disposal
systems and aquifer contamination prompted the need to
upgrade the old system, enlarge its processing capacity and
consequently expand the service area. The original service area
was built around M-134 and Griffith Street, serving
approximately 200 dwelling units. A recent expansion,
completed during the summer of 1993, extended sewer lines
west along M-134 into Hessel and Hessel Point; and east of
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-1

�Cedarville along M-134, into Connors Point Hill and No. 8
Island (See Map 5-1).
TABLE 5-1
SEWER FACILITY CAPACITY
Plant

Clark Township Waste
Water
Facility

Current
Built
Capacity
.2002 mgd

Average
Dally Flows

Excess
Capacity

Treatment
Level

Expandability

. 108 mgd

.092 mgd

Tertiary
discharged
into
Pearson
Creek/Lake
Huron

Limited by
geography

The new sewer system has been designed to accommodate
current and future demands. The current capacity of this
system is .2 million gallons per day (mgd) as determined by the
capacity of the existing storage lagoons. The pumping and
processing facility has the capacity to process more than the
storage lagoons will hold and expandability is limited to the
availability of suitable land for more storage space.
At the present time, all hook up requests within the existing
service area have been satisfied and significant adjacent
undeveloped land still remains. Since the system's completion,
the flow meters have not been functional and actual flows are
not yet available but, an average daily flow has been estimated
at .108 mgd. This was derived by multiplying the average
household size (2.5 persons per household) times a .per person
usage rate (75 gallons per day) times the current number of
hookups (576). The excess capacity under this method of
calculation and is .092 mgd (see Table 5-1) . By using the same
method to derive unutilized capacity, approximately 490
additional residential µnits could be accommodated before
consuming the excess capacity. Applying 490 dwelling units to
the current allowable minimum development density for R-1
through R-3 zones (ldu/ 10,000 s.f.) the developed area would
be slightly less than 113 acres. In contrast, the 576 hook-ups
in the existing service area extend over 1500 acres, much of

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-2

�a:::

w

~
CL w

- en
:C C

en w
Zen
~~

00
..... ~
~c

c::z

U)

z

a::

i=
(.)

sw

w

0

"'I"""

I

LO

a.
ca

~

--i~
.

w
.a::

U)

C,

z

Cl

s

I

I-

U)

0

X

...J

w

LL

&lt;&lt;
..J
u~I-

a::

w
w
U)

s
sw
z

I
I·

I

(!)

r

-en&gt;&lt;w

U)

I
I

O'

j

I
I

]• ; II
3]

I

-Qi,

•

0

"'

I

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-3

�which is sparsely developed land. Most of the existing
development activity is concentrated near the waterfront. The
presence of wetlands, hydric soils or other sensitive
environmental features will limit the full utilization of the
entire 1500 acres for future development purposes. For
planning purposes, approximately 500 additional acres can be
added to the existing service area to include both properties
within and immediately adjacent to the existing service district.
This 500 additional acres is comprised of undeveloped
properties where sewer mainlines and lateral lines are already
in place and will constitute an expanded Service District as
described (or discussed) below.

Public Service Districts

The development of public service districts is based upon the
strategy that as new development occurs, public services
necessary to serve it are in place and where no services exist,
the land has sufficient carrying capacity to accommodate
development. It is a strategy intended to concentrate
development above 1 dwelling/ acre in select areas of the
Township. Map 5-2 depicts five public service districts:
Existing Service District, Expanded Service District, proposed
Future Service District, Rural Service District and Island
Service District.

Existing, Expanded and Future Service Districts

The Existing Service District includes all the area
encompassing existing hook-ups and the Expanded Service
District includes adjacent land that could easily be included at
some point in the future. Together, the existing and expanded
service districts consume the entire capacity of the existing
sewer system. Thus, additional areas could be served only with
expansion of the treatment facility. Future expansion of

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-4

~

�CLARK TOWNSHIP
PROPOSED PUBLIC
SERVICE DISTRICTS

Map 5-2

-u
-

E
~

6

;

9'
~
en ~

~
f/l

~
~

~2:

'

Expanded Service Dislricl
Proposed Fulure Service Dislricl
Existing Sewer Service Dislricl

~

Rural Septic Syslem

D

Island Septic Syslem

Dislricl
District

~

�the system requires construction of additional storage lagoons.
If constructed, additional treatment lines could be extended to
those properties which lie adjacent to the waterfront but
outside of expanded service district. Expansion would involve
extending existing sewer laterals east and west along M-134.
Table 5-2 shows the number of private septic system permits
issued over the last ten years. The average number of permits
issued per year was 32, compared to an average of 26 well
permits. Although these figures cannot be interpreted to mean
32 constructed buildings each year (as some were replacement
systems), it does provide some
TABLE 5-2
WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEM PERMITS
CLARK TOWNSHIP, MACKINAC COUNTY
Year
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993

Septic System
27
28
25
36
37
41
25
38
36
36

Number of Permits Issued
Well
18
16
29
24
28
25
27
30
33
36

indication of development activity in Clark Township. At the
current rate of growth, the need for sewer service within the
proposed Future Service District is at least 20 years away. A
change in growth rates, however, could accelerate the need for
service within this area.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-6

�tn

a. z
-0
:c ~

u

z_

(/)~

3:
~
0 ...I
t-

9

~~

0:: u.

&lt;~

..J I-

(.) fb

tn

("t')
I

LO
0.

rn

~

&lt;])

&lt;])

~

~

&lt;])

tel

~

(Cl

L

L

..c

a:

(1)

&lt;])

Q)

L

(])

&gt;

u

~

&lt;])

0

0

(Cl

(.tl

2

L

3:

•

(J)

~

IJ~ •

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-7

�Rural Service Districts

'' ~

The Rural Service District is characterized by low development
densities, no public infrastructure and a predominance of
septic field systems. Porous soils and shallow geology have
made for severe conditions for the citing of septic systems in
over 98% of the Township's land area. Map 5-3 graphically
depicts surficial soils limitations for residential septic systems.
This map should also be viewed in tandem with Geological
Characteristics. Limitations ranging from severe to slight are
shown with severe limitations having the lightest pattern and
slight limitations having the darkest. Areas not rated are
shown in cross-hatch and lakes or large ponds are shown in
black.
This map also indicates a part of the northwest portion of the
Township as suitable for development based on septic systems.
It is characterized by natural geologic formations of unique
proportions and composition, marked by glacial escarpments,
perched wetlands and sharp contrasts in elevation. In
particular, the Rockview Lookout Tower sits approIDm.ately 180
feet above the mean elevation of the township, providing an
opportunity for panoramic views of the surround landscape.
This area's unique physical characteristics, together with its
relative suitability for accommodating private septic systems,
has resulted in a high level of land parcelization, significantly
more intensive than other sections of the township.
Presently, the Chippewa County Health Department
administers the septic approval processes for all of Mackinac
County and has done so without the aid of a modern soils
survey. The United States Soil Conservation Service has
recently completed all field work for a modern soil survey and
has identified all soil classifications in a preliminary report.
The final report should be out sometime during the summer of
1994. With current information in-hand, Chippewa County
Health officials can conduct area suitability assessments with
more confidence and knowledge of Clark Township's
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-8

,-

�indigenous soil conditions. Future residents in the Rural
Service Districts will have the benefit of this resource when
selecting future homesites.

Island Service Districts

The availability of public services within the Island Service
District are extremely limited as access is by watercraft only
and seasonal change makes the provision of most services
during winter months very difficult. The islands are also host
to some of the Township's most sensitive environments and are
vulnerable to intensive forms of development. Current
development density on the islands is generally low but, is
more intensive than found in the rural areas of the mainland.
The intent of this Plan is to encourage only low density future
development on,,, the islands in areas that avoid sensitive
environments.'doing so will not only protect areas that
contribute to the tourist economy, but also will avoid the need
for extensive public infrastructure and associated costs.
Potable Water

There is no public water supply system in Clark Township and
no plans are underway to develop one. Individual wells tapping
groundwater are the most common system utilized, although
some island residents get their water directly from Lake Huron.
The Chippewa County Health Department has recommended
that a public water supply system be developed. Private wells
in select areas of the Township have become contaminated by
failing septic systems. Most existing private wells are shallow;
less than 100 feet deep. Furthermore, groundwater is in
unconfined aquifers so there is no cap (clay, or other
impervious material) between the upper and lower aquifer
layers found within bedrock. The bedrock is comprised of
dolomite limestone and is fractured due to glaciation and
weathering over time. These fractures permit contaminants to
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-9

�easily migrate from upper to lower aquifers. The Chippewa
County Health Department has recently required that all new
wells be drilled to depths greater than 100 and that a grouting
system, which seals the entire casing, be employed in an
attempt to mitigate the migration of contaminants.
Stormwater Management

Stormwater drainage has been identified as a problem in many
areas south of M-134, particularly within the Hodeck Road
corridor. Throughout Clark Township's coastal areas filling and
grading have altered natural drainage patterns and old
stormwater drainage tiles have collapsed in many areas near
the Lake.
Two primary issues stand in the way of resolving existing
drainage problems. The first is the lack of a County Drain
Commissioner with the authority to develop standards,
regulate and finance drainage projects. The second is the need
to protect existing wetland amenities, which have already been
damaged by improper filling and grading activities. Since the
Township has limited agricultural development, drainage
facilities would be primarily for residential and commercial
development. One of the best ways to address drainage issues
is preventative: work to reduce sediment and hazardous
chemical discharge from existing development and isolate
future development and redevelopment from hydric soils,
coastal floodplains and wetlands.
Electric Power

Electric power is provided by the Edison Sault Electric
Company from Sault Ste. Marie and Cloverland Electric Co-op,
Inc., of Dafter. Electric power service, for domestic, industrial
and commercial uses is considered adequate at this time.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-10

�~

Police and Fire Protection

The Township has excellent fire protection equipment and
services. The islands however, because of their isolation,
cannot get as prompt responses as available on the mainland.
The Township does have a fire boat although, the service
available to the islanders is very limited. Yet, in a recent
township-wide survey, 62% of the respondents agreed that, in
general, fire service was adequate.
Police protection and marine law enforcement are provided by
the County Sheriffs Department. Ambulance services are also
provided by the Township. Results of the 1992 Township
citizen opinion survey show that 70% of the respondents
agreed that the ambulance service was adequate; while only
40% agreed that services from the Sheriffs Department were
adequate and only 33% felt that marine safety services were
adequate.

a·

Recreational and Cultural Facilities

There are a variety of recreational facilities available in the
Township, including boating and camping facilities, trails, play
fields, gyms and a golf course (see Table 5-3 and Map 5-4). The
Township is responsible for both the Hessel and Cedarville
mooring, launching and harbor facilities; the community
center, and several outdoor sport facilities. The Cedarville
Branch Library, located in Clark Township, is a separate entity
from the Township. Over the past several years, the Township
has been seeking to locate a new public beach on the
waterfront as a compliment to existing recreational
opportunities. Recent efforts in this search have been focused
in the Hessel area.
It is not surprising that in the 1992 community opinion
survey, the activities most often engaged in by respondents
were boating, hunting, fishing, walking and swimming. Boating
and fishing activities were in the top two and virtually all of the
high response activities in the Township were resource-based
oriented.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-11

�Although the historic significance of the Les Cheneaux Islands
has been briefly touched upon it should be noted that there are
no registered state or federal historic sites in the Township.
Likewise, there are no recorded archaeological sites. However,
there is an active historical society and historic sites are being
documented.
Transportation

The western border of the Township is approximately 24 miles
northeast of the Mackinac Bridge. Highway M-134 provides
major east-west access, running near the coastline and
through the Township. Highway M-129 generally bisects the
Township and provides major north/south access, starting at
Cedarville running north to the City of Sault Ste. Marie. Both
highways are in good condition and carry a large volume of
traffic throughout the year (see Map 5-5). M-129 is also
Michigan's principal meridian. Three Mile Road running
North/South and serving the Western sections of the
Township, functions as a collector road primarily for rural
residents.
Although the majority of roads in the Township are gravel
many principle arterials and collector roads are paved,
including a mile stretch of Nordquist Road and a 1.5 mile
stretch of Swede Road east of M-129 (see Map 5-6). The
Michigan Department of Transportation and the Mackinac
County Road Commission have classified Clark Township
roadways as follows:
• M-134 and M-129 are classified as state trunklines.
• Outside Hessel and Cedarville, and inland from the coast; St
Ig1:ace,_ 3-Mile, and Swede Roads are classified as county
pnmanes.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-12

�t

. ,
•

.,1u11 11u11,1

/fl'OA(U

=--=

. . .:. l. . :·;1·. . . ..,............=
. .r. . . . .

~-

~·~
.~

1-=-c¥¥~-- -t- m-- ·ill.---- -:::.....
,

~

II

:----,-,-

~

·-"

'- •

"

.~_6j~
r ,. ~,*\"•.~ " -0.

II

"

{'

II

•

:I

•

.

-· -

$1A'£Df

!......

INDik . ....
\

'.'. .
-

-=-

r"
:i,t:

~

,.
II

'\- ~ --+I

-=-I

CLARK TOWNSHIP

.,

. .,

IIO

:·······r·· ....:.......:..................

-1.--•-·--

!!,

II

I

"\\..
---

lI'

RECREATION FACILITIES

(,
II

II

l

Map 5-4

\._~11

-~. ,

~ I

'-

-·· ·---·

~

~

r,

d

- - -- •-

-, ----;

~ --,j

~!
~~

-· ·- ,- ~~""''

· ~

w&gt;tj

~
en
~

~

~

~~

'

1 . Government Island Picnic Areas
2. Finger Piers at Hessel Marina
3. DNR Snowmobile Trail
4. Scenic Turnout
5. Hessel Boat Harbor and Ramp
6. Outdoor Skating Rink, Basketball Court, Tennis Court
7. Softball Field

8. Community Center
9. Cedarville Mooring and Launching Facility
10. Athletic Field
11. Indoor School Facilities
12. Les Cheneaux Club

* Numbers 6, 8, 9, 10, and 11 are located in Cedarville

�TABLE 5-3
CLARK TOWNSHIP RECREATION FACILITIES
OWNERSHIP
Federal

NAME
1. Government Island
Picnic Area
2. Finger Piers at Hessel
Marina
3. Clark Township
Snowmobile Trails

Township
Private and State

4. State highway Scenic
Turnout (M-134)
5. Hessel Boat Harbor and
Ramp

State
Township

6. Outdoor Skating Rink,
Basketball, Tennis Court

Township

7. Softball Field
8. Community Center

Township
Township

9. Cedarville Mooring and
Launching Facility

Township

10. Athletic Field

Les Cheneaux Community
Schools

11. Indoor School Facilities

Les Cheneaux Community
Schools
Private (but open to public)

12. Les Cheneaux Club
Golf Course

FACILITY
4 picnic tables, 2 grills, 2
vault-type toilets.
Fishing, walking and
boating opportunities.
Trails inter-connect with
State, County and other
private trails.
Picnic tables.

10 transient accommodations, gasoline,
telephone (pay station) ,
water, restrooms (flush
toilets), showers, haulout
facilities.
Outdoor concrete skating
rink, basketball court at
one end, tennis court at
other end.
Backstop, filed.
Large hall, bathrooms,
kitchen, stage, storage
rooms, skating warming
room.
Boat launching ramp,
parking, mooring area,
picnic tables.
Football/baseball/ softball
combination area, tennis
court, basketball court.
Gymnasium, all-purpose
room, older gymnasium.
Nine-hole golf course.

*Numbers correspond to identical numbers on Map

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-14

�•

I)

~
CLARK TOWNSHIP
TRAFFIC COUNTS

Map 5-5

II

~

11

I

I

I/ ;_500PV
..

irbf I ' ' At::.nnAn\/1
, •··~~·,

~

I . , , III i I

IJ ,--···
'
I ____

lnnn.n.

Al""\\/

,.

I

~

6
en

I

~ l 1l t&lt;F;l)J:w~.tri
r,~~~·lr-t~~(L
~
• ~tJ-~e+ktik-r-H---lW-C=i
nm-.u I II
111
I

~~
en "ti

~

C/l

~
~

~~

~

\

1983 AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME
1991 AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME
1991 PEAK VOLUME

�a.

(/)

z

S: z
en Q
zt3: ~

i==

-

coI

Cl

z

0 a:::

v,0

a.
rn

o&lt;t

,ctO

ocr
crJ
ow

~

C)

~ (/)

Vl

I.O

0
CJ

I-~

z
c:::z i==
&lt;( ~
..J ....

A

I~~~

0

(/)

c::

~I
~~

w~ cc:
~ a::
a. I.!)

&lt;

:;: 8

(/)

&gt;&lt;
w

0

~,
F~

~ ....... , •• ••••• •••••••••••..•

························· ··· ·•.•· ······ .. ••••• ••••• .. ·;t•

-

::

&lt;-'

!1l

E

: -

-

-

, - - - - - - .4:-.:zs.;~, ;; -;_. ~ -t-?.J~{
---·
~., 7
I

r

l qt . ,
-1•

"' o~t

~f .

d:i::r.
....,..rf __-'
-

·1---:,-- - -·

--_r
I

~G-••
f

I

r

:I -!
=

'Oil/

t'

.111#1

"'

!

'

...

=

::

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-16

�• In Cedarville, Hodeck, Meridian and Beach Streets are
classified as county primaries.
• In Hessel, part of Cedar Road west of 3-mile is classified as
county primary.
• Other small stretches of county primary roads in the
Township include:
• Meridian Road (M- 129), south of Cedarville;
• State Ave ., west of Blind Line;
• the road out to Connor's Point;
• Lakeside Road.
• Hill Island Road.
• All other roads or streets in the Township are classified as
county local roads.
The 1992 community opinion survey reflected that only 36% of
the respondents agreed that roads were adequate in the
Township.
Road access throughout the Township is limited. Most
standard Townships have a grid-like road system every mile or
so. However, Clark has several sections with limited or
nonexistent road access. The only islands with road linkage to
the mainland are Hill Island and Island No. 8. This lack of
access is not necessarily negative. Oftentimes, road access
inadvertently promotes fragmentation of the land base and
sprawl development patterns. Limited access in the Township
is also a land use issue and is discussed in Chapter 6.
The current system has adequate capacity for existing and
future demand for the next 10 years based upon current
growth rates. The intent of this Plan is to promote continuance
of the present level of service and to make minor future
improvements as deemed appropriate to meet growing
transportation demand.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-17

�Township Airport
The Clark Township Airport is located north of Hessel off 3Mile Road. This facility services only small aircraft. Consisting
of a black top runway, a hangar and other storage buildings,
there are no current plans to expand this facility.

Other Access Points
The Township is also readily accessed via private boat at
either the Hessel or Cedarville docks. The only railroad line is
a private spur which carries limestone from the Michigan
Limestone Corporation quarry to ships at Port Dolomite. This
port is being used strictly by Michigan limestone and is
designed to the specifications of its operations. In the past,
commercial vessels used the Cedarville dock, but the facility is
no longer equipped to service commercial vessels. Only
pleasure craft, excursion and fishing vessels use this facility.
The harbor at Hessel is more modern and can accommodate
small to medium sized vessels. There is an unmet need for
commercial vessel dockage in Hessel and Cedarville.
There are recreational boat launch facilities at both Cedarville
and Hessel. A recently completed marina in Cedarville was
constructed to meet the increasing demand for pleasure boat
facilities.
LB\ word \clark\chap5b .doc
6/10/94

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
5-18

�Chapter 6 - EXISTING AND FUTURE
LAND USE AND POLICY STATEMENTS

Introduction

The contents of this chapter focus on three primary subjects:
Existing Land Use, Future Land Use and Policy State1nents.
The discussion starts by illustrating the changes in land
ownership patterns that have occurred over a 60 year period,
then shifts to a description of the Township's land cover. While
the former describes land use trends, the later provides an
overview of the Township's land features. The resultant picture
is one of increased low density development rapidly spreading
across a truly unique landscape.
In concert, both parts are most insightful for explaining the
existing land use patterns. The existing Land Use Map is an
excellent portrayal of the Township's pattern of growth and
clearly shows where development has occurred and why.
Although this pattern of development has maximized
development choices among property owners, it has reduced
the ability to preserve the natural features and the unique
characteristics of the Township's rural environment.
The Future Land Use Plan addresses these issues and sets the
stage for change by building upon existing land use
classifications and creating new land use designations which
reflect current knowledge of the Township's unique features
and land use needs. A Future Land Use Map is presented,
graphically depicting these classifications. Also a staged
approach for accommodating growth is recommended, as
supported by the Public Services Districts Map identified in
Chapter 5. Last, both land use and transportation policies are
presented with the intent that these policies be consulted
whenever considering future land use decisions.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-1

�Land Fragmentation

The rate of growth within Clark Township over the last 10
years provides a positive sign that the area continues to attract
individuals seeking the unique natural quality found in the
Township. In part, this is facilitated by Clark Township's
zoning which provide ample land development opportunities to
maximized the lifestyle choice of new residents. However, these
opportunities are resulting in the division of significant
amounts of land into smaller and smaller parcels.
The size of a parcel influences its economic viability for various
uses. In order for a parcel to be economically viable for forestry
or agricultural uses, it generally has to be at least 40 acres in
size. If this parcel is divided into smaller pieces it will likely be
sold to separate owners (probably for residential development).
Once this occurs, the land is not likely to be managed for
resource-based commodities, and in the case of Clark
Township, are more likely to be residentially oriented. Although
commercial forestry and agriculture are limited in the
Township, land fragmentation is still a critical issue since it
also influences mineral extraction, recreational activities,
natural environmental systems and community character ..
Figure 6-1 illustrates how land fragmentation has occurred
over a 60 year period from 1930 to 1991 in a four section area
of the Township. In 1930, the majority of parcels were 120-160
acres and, by 1955, had declined to 40-80 acres. By 1976
there were still larger parcels, but smaller property splits (of
under 15 acres) began to appear. Changes which occurred
between 1976 and 1991 witnessed a dramatic acceleration of
lot splits. Parcels of 10 acres or less dominated the landscape,
many of them having only private easement access to a public
road.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-2

~

�Figure 6-1

Clark Township Historic Plat Maps
.D. I"!~ Fod:l,n .

IZO

,, 0

1955

1930

;../;//,0'"

(Jon,er. e~o./
4

oo,--_

__.c,c.L..f

1991

1976
Source: Historic Plat Maps, Mackinac County, 1930, 1955, 1976, 1991
reproduced with permission from Rockford Maps Inc.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-3

�Historical evidence suggests that development activity, rather
than coming to an abrupt halt or surge in the near future, will
continue at a paced incremental growth rate. As construction
of new sewer lateral lines occurs within the Existing and
Expanded Sewer Service Districts (see Map 5-2) only, the
potential for increased fragmentation could be significantly
reduced.

Land Cover

Review of the Township's land use and cover, taken from the
Michigan Resource Inventory System of 1978, provides a single
point in time assessment and is used here as benchmark for
present and future comparisons. According to 1978 aerial
photography and other geographical support data, the
Township encompasses approximately 50,790 acres, of which
over 84% (about 42,700 acres) is forest cover. The majority of
forest cover is in either upland conifers or aspen/birch. Almost
15% of the Township (approximately 7,500 acres) is classified
as some form of wetland; the majority of which is lowland
conifers. Agriculture only accounted for about 1% of the total
land area of the Township (620 acres). Extraction operations
accounted for about 1,270 acres. Commercial development
amounted to only about 48 acres, but about 91 % of that was
in the form of strip commercial development. A more detailed
account of land use and land cover is presented in Table 6-1
and Figure 6-2.

Existing Land Use

Map 6-1 depicts the location of various land uses throughout
the Township. The symbols mark seasonal and year-round
homes, resort, commercial and industrial establishments.
Residential cottages and resort development are concentrated
along shorelines of the mainland and on several islands. In

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-4

�Table 6-1
LAND USE/COVER CLASSIFICATION
Acres
Urban
Low Rise Multi-Family
1.30
1,080.16
Single Family, Duplex
4.05
Mobile Home Par1c
Commercial Services
2.17
Central Business District
2.31
Strip Commercial
43.66
Institutional
21.72
39.63
Industrial
Transportation
47.43
98.15
Utilities
297.37
Open Pit Extractive
971.07
Undemround Extractive
Outdoor Cultural, Public Assembly
4.83
Outdoor Recreation
77.75
Cemeteries
8.70
Aqriculture
Cropland
609.20
Permanent Pasture
5.66
5.42
Other
Open
1,254.46
Herbaceous
Shrub
680.57
Forest
Upland Hardwood (North Zone)
8,721.77
Asoen Birch
10,978.03
Lowland Hardwoods
655.40
Pine
374.78
Other Upland Conifers
17,079.63
Water
Lake
161.73
Wetlands
Lowland
43.05
lowland Conifers
4,958.65
Forested
40.29
Shrub
1,669.17
Aauatic Bed
81.30
Emeraent
608.57
Hydric Soils and Flats
54.88
Barren
Beach, Riverbank
101.67
50,784.53
TOT AL AREA IN ACRES

Figure 6-2
LAND USE/COVER CLASSIFICATION
Barren 0.2%
Wetlands 14.7%

Urban 5 .3%
Agriculture 1.2%
Open 3 .8%

Forest 74.5%
Source: DNR, MIRIS, Michigan Resources Information System, 1978.

Source: DNR, MIRIS, Michigan Resource Information
System, 1978.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-5

�-,

-:cena.. en
z

w
:::&gt;

.

C

~ z&lt;(
0 -'
I-

I

...
... ... u ...iii:
....,, :z.,, .,, ... .,,...
... ... u :z
= .,,
::E

(0

0

0.

ro

(!)

~

~~

•

.,,
...

~

=

C

C

c,:

c,:

0

::E

0:: t-

0

&lt; 5Q

0

C

c,:

::E
::E
0

C

::::,
Q

..J~

0

I&gt;
!:!

'!!

:

!?

:::

-+-

=

N

...

...
N

. ..

•

·rr.
....

.

.

r?.

!:!

..

..

...

.

.

.

'·o..

!!,

' .

. .,•
..

:

.,,

.,

.. .

!::

.

f.
~

.:-..

_. ' - - - - - - - '

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-6

�..
contrast, developments along the public roads are widely
dispersed. Many year-round residential homes are located in
the Villages of Cedarville and Hessel, as well as original
commercial uses. Much of the new commercial development is
scattered outside the Villages along M-134 and on County
roads west of M-129. Industrial uses are primarily centered
around the quarry operation and utilize a rail line to access
docking slips at Port Dolomite. Smaller manufacturing
operations are also located in Hessel and Cedarville. When
viewed in total, all development illustrates a pattern which is
essentially linear. Each use is located along primary
transportation routes or along the waterfront and capitalizes
on one or more aspects of its surroundings, such as ease of
access, visibility to the traveling public, existing infrastructure
or waterfront views.
These strip-like developments are typically only one lot deep
and most are less than 100 feet wide. Should development
continue as usual, the results are likely to be miscellaneous
scatterings of developments stripped across the landscape. The
results will be diminished natural features and a loss of unique
physical characteristics within Clark Township. It will also
result in a loss of the rural character of the Township if
existing greenspaces and other open spaces are converted to
another use. These areas provide the natural edge to existing
development and give it a rural character.

Future Land Use

The Future Land Use Plan seeks to anticipate land use needs
for 20 to 30 years into the future. Information provided in
previous chapters set the stage for the recommendations which
follow by providing an understanding of existing conditions and
ongoing trends which influenced current development
patterns. The impacts of these development patterns were
presented, as were the future land use needs of the Township
if current trends were to continue. This information, together
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-7

�with input from the 1992 citizen opinion survey, and from
Township officials and residents, served as the basis for
creation of this Plan's goals and objectives. These goals and
objectives in turn served as the basis for evaluating alternative
land use arrangements. The
key planning and design principals inherent in these goals and
objectives which have resulted in the creation of the preferred
plan include:
• Protection of public health and safety
• Insuring compatibility between land uses
• Protecting environmentally sensitive areas and preserving
renewable natural resources
• Providing cost effective public services
• Retaining the natural coastal heritage of the Township
• Encouraging high quality sustainable economic
development
• Preserving and protecting natural habitat and biological
function within watersheds
• Creating a variety of social and recreational opportunities
• Providing safe and affordable housing 8
The Future Land Use Plan is based upon the premise that new
development will be accommodated within the Township as
long as it occurs in a manner which is respectful of and
complimentary to the unique characteristics important to
township residents (and visitors), including: 1) the sensitive
natural features, 2) the waterfront and shoreline, 3) the rural
community character, 4) the township's ecological systems and
the communities natural coastal heritage. Failure to respect
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-8

;--..,...__

�these characteristics will undermine the economic base of the
Township and the quality of life enjoyed by existing residents.

•

The large blocks of State owned property within the Township,
while consuming 18% (9,133 acres) of its land area, are a
tremendous asset upon which to build a physical plan. Public
land holdings are primarily in the Lake Superior State Forest
and are found concentrated north of M-134. Smaller State
owned parcels are also found on Marquette Island and on the
mainland's eastern leg of the Township. The only National
forest land is Government Island. These public holdings serve
as permanent greenbelts, as recreation resources and as a core
around which the forest ecosystems and natural rural
character can be maintained. Corporate land holdings are also
a dominate feature consuming about 11 % (approximately
5,500 acres) of the Township's total land area. Mineral
extraction will continue to be a important economic base.
Wetland properties, which are widely dispersed throughout the
Township, generally follow the landscape's natural contours,
running through the State lands in linear form, and
terminating at various points along the lakeshore (See Map 62).

These features further build upon and compliment State lands
by creating a series of continuous natural systems, enhancing
wildlife habitat, biodiversity and water quality within the
Township, while offering enhanced recreational opportunities
and improved ability to retain rural and natural
characteristics. This is the foundation upon which this Plan is
based.
The objective of this Plan is to accommodate new growth and
development in a manner which is sensitive to the Township's
unique features and characteristics while creating a physical

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-9

�CLARK TOWNSHIP
LAND DIVISIONS
Map 6-2
. . Wetlands

~

- F e d e r a l and State Land

&gt;.,
~

-

"i

Township Land

0

~
01 Cl.i
.:..~
C "ti

~Corporate Ownership Mineral Ex traction
Duseable Land for Development

~

1:/l
~II

&gt;.,

~...__

~

"a

~

II

-~

~

~

~r ~\~~~ r~ ~~~ ~

~

~

"

1)

�development pattern which achieves the goals and objectives of
this document.
The Future Land Use Plan calls for a stronger program to
preserve coastal character, protect environmental resources,
retain significant visual resources, enhance retail and resort
business, and consolidate nonresidential uses in appropriate
locations. In addition, emphasis is given to discouraging
development where the capacity to support that development is
extremely limited due to the fragility of the land and to
discourage the unplanned creation of ten acre (and smaller)
lots often stripped along County roads. This lot split pattern
has negatively impacted the rural quality of the Township as
well as the efficiency and safety of the roadway network.

Future Land Use Map

The Future Land Use Map in this section proposes future land
uses which build upon existing land uses. Following is a review
of the principal land use categories represented on the Future
Land l:Jse Map. Together, the elements on the Map formulate
the planned future land use pattern for the Township. (see
Map 6-3).

Rural/Forest Land Use
Much of the Township's forested area outside of public ownership is being divided into smaller and smaller units as a result
of scattered rural residential development. Consequently, the
character of the rural countryside within the Township is
changing and the natural ecosystems are being threatened.
This Plan recognizes that the long term quality of life in Clark
Township, and the ecological integrity of its land, will be
directly influenced by the development patterns which occur
within rural areas. A key objective of this Plan is to ensure that

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-11

�CLARK TOWNSHIP
Future Land Use
~ Island Residential (1 D.U./5-10 AC.)
~ Urban Services Residential (4 D.U./AC.)

~
~

~

Commercial Services
~ Rural/Forest (1 D.U./1AC.)

d

1Z2J

~

Waterfront Residential (1 D.U./AC.)

~ Mineral Resource Extraction/Industrial

0\ Cl.i

.:.. ;!:

~ "ti

~

~ ~~A

~

::0

flt

~

'-

')

~

~

=. 0

1J

�•
Clark . Township
Mackinac County

CLARK TOWNSHIP
Future Land Use
~ Island Residential (1 D.U./5-10 AC.)

~

~ Urban Services Residential (4 D.U./AC.)

~

~

-

Commercial Services
~ Rural/Forest (1 D.U./1AC.)

ci
~
0\ f/j

l2Z] Waterfront Residential (1 D.U./AC.)

......

.:J:

t-.)

~ Mineral Resource Extraction/Industrial

"li

~t'Jl

~

,
,
~

~

t

"-

�as development occurs, the integrity of the Township's rural
areas are not compromised. With this objective in mind, a
series of friendly land practices (regulatory inducements) are
encouraged which can reduce the potential impacts of future
rural development. These practices include but are not limited
to the following:
• Parcel sizes permitted within rural areas remain the
same as presently allowed, (generally ranging between 1
and 10 acres for new development) provided that
anytime two or more lots are created, open space zoning
techniques be used to maintain the average density at 1
dwelling unit per 10 acres even though the actual lot
size may be smaller. Changes are recommended,
however, to lot dimensions permitted along State and
County roads. Lot widths should more appropriately
reflect parcel size. This will in turn affect the spacing of
individual access drives along roadways to ensure safer
and more efficient traffic movement over time.
•

Cluster housing incentives should be utilized which
encourage the grouping (or clustering) of parcels within
rural areas in order to reduce the impacts upon the
natural environment, to keep large areas open and to
preserve the function of individual roadways.

•

Guidelines should be established which encourage the
protection of rural character through retention of
natural open spaces and the preservation of indigenous
vegetation and other natural features on-site as
development occurs.

•

Buffering techniques should be encouraged to minimize
sound and visual impacts where industrial or mineral
extraction activities are proposed adjacent to areas
designated rural/ forest.

•

Guidelines should be established which encourage the
retention of natural edges between the road and new
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-13

�development to preserve the rural environmental
character of the Township's road corridors.
Residential densities within this district are intended to remain
low. Significant road improvements are not anticipated and
public infrastructure is not planned for extension into this area
in the foreseeable future.

•

Island Residential
The Les Cheneaux Islands have long been recognized as
offering one of the most unique physical settings within the
State of Michigan. The popularity of these islands as a summer
resort destination began in the early 1900's and continues
today. The island setting, scenic beauty, natural features, rural
atmosphere, pristine lakefront, unique boating environment
and fishing all contributed to the transformation of these
islands into a premier rural resort area. Much of the mainland
business activity is directly related to servicing island and
lakefront seasonal residents. Relative to the land mass of the
islands (approximately 5,300 acres), the overall number of
dwellings is relatively low, reaching 500 units in 1990. Limited
waterfront properties, physical characteristics and property
ownership have each been contributing factors to this overall
low density character. Special conditions have applied to island
development for years relating to placement of residences as
well as accessory buildings (primarily boat houses). The result
is for the most part, a natural physical setting as viewed both
from the water and the land.
This Plan recognizes the unique characteristics of the islands,
both from a resort and natural features perspective. In a
recent study conducted by the Nature Conservancy, several
locations on the islands were found to represent highly
sensitive natural features which contribute to the biodiversity
of the entire region. As reflected by the Nature Conservancy in
a statement regarding the value of certain Island properties,
"The protection of significant sites of biodiversity will protect a
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-14

�healthy environment for current and future residents, sustain
tourism and recreation industries for the long term, provide
educational opportunities and maintain the scenic value and
quality of life of the area." Simply defined, biodiversity is the
variety of life and its processes. Its conservation is not limited
to rare plant and animals but also the larger issue of
protecting the full richness of the area's ecosystems. For years,
these ecosystems have been a contributing force to the strong
interest in Clark Township as a seasonal resort community, as
well as a strong factor in the Township's economy, whether
fishing, hunting or recreating.
This Plan acknowledges the importance of maintaining the
integrity of these ecosystems within Clark Township as new
development occurs.
The islands' ability to accommodate future growth and
development is affected by several factors. At current permitted
densities (10,000 square foot lots), the islands theoretically
have the ability to accommodate over twice the number of
people presently residing in all of Clark Township. Obviously,
this level of intensity would change the character of the islands
dramatically. At the same time, the vehicular parking problems
evident on_the mainland today (associated with cars used by
island residents and visitors), and the increased boat traffic,
would seriously alter the quality of life enjoyed by current
island residents and visitors. In addition, providing basic
public services (police and fire protection) to island residents
under this scenario would be both necessary and extremely
costly.
This Plan recommends development density for all island
properties be set at one acre minimum lot sizes with a
minimum 200 foot frontage. The intensity of development at
this lot size is consistent with the minimum lot sizes currently
permitted within rural areas of the Township. This will permit
greater flexibility in siting a residence which is responsive to
specific natural characteristics of individual sites as well as
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-15

~

~

�•

construction of a supporting well and septic system. For
projects consisting of more than one dwelling unit, planned
unit development techniques should be required where lots are
clustered on smaller lots in order to preserve as much of the
natural environment as possible.
This Plan also recommends that for development on islands
more dense than a single home on individual parcel, other
issues must also be addressed on the mainland relating to the
provision of adequate parking and boat slips, as well as the
adequacy of public facilities services to satisfy new demands.

Rural Waterfront
Mainland coastal areas within the Township have been the
most popular of all locations for new homesites for obvious
reasons. Year round use opportunities, convenience,
waterfront access, water views, recreational opportunities,
rural character and natural features have each contributed to
the high demand for this property. In several instances, small
tourist resorts are found scattered throughout this district,
providing water access opportunities for visitors to the
Township. As with many of the island properties, rural
waterfront properties tend to be very natural in character.
Specific development guidelines should be put in place relative
to the placement of buildings on individual sites which
maintain minimum setback distances from the waters edge.
Scattered wetlands and highly sensitive environmental
properties are evident throughout this area, similar to
conditions found on the islands.
This Plan recommends that for any new development, and
redevelopment within this area that special consideration be
given to water quality protection, preservation of natural
features, particularly along the water's edge and minimal
intrusion upon the biologically diverse sensitive environments
distributed throughout the area. A minimum lot size of one
acre should be maintained with at least 150 feet of frontage on
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-16

�the water. In addition, for developments consisting of more
than a single family home and related accessory structures,
building mass and scale should be consistent with
surrounding development and sensitive to natural features
inherent on the property. Buildings and structures should be
located based upon the following criteria:
a) using wetland and sensitive areas maps, highly sensitive
natural features should be preserved to the extent
possible.
b) existing views of the Lake and from the Lake to the shore
should be preserved to the extent possible through
sensitive site design.
c) natural edges should be retained to maintain existing
ecosystems and protect the natural character of this
district.
d) when both resort uses and single family uses are
permitted adjacent to one another within the same
district, additional sideyard setbacks should be
maintained, as well as any natural buffers within those
setbacks.

Urban Residential
The urban residential district is intended to accommodate the
most intensive development within the Township. Boundaries
of this district have been identified on the basis of projected
sewer service within the Township. As discussed previously,
sewer service is not available to all properties within this
district today. It is anticipated however, based on the capacity
of the sewer system that, over time, it will be made available to
properties which have been designated as urban residential.
While residential is anticipated to be the most dominant use
within the district, other uses are anticipated. As found within
the rural waterfront district, resort uses are also anticipated,
although within designated areas, as determined appropriate.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-17

- --

-~

-

�A density of four dwelling units per acre (10,000 square foot
lots) is recommended within this district, although actual lot
sizes could vary depending on natural features or if developed
as a planned unit development (PUD). The objective of
encouraging P.U.D.'s is to offer flexibility in site design and
parcel size, as a means of preserving the natural features of a
site.
Subdivision development within this district is encouraged to
be appropriately sited, landscaped and setback from roadways,
reflecting a low density neighborhood character.
Along M-134 and M-129, the number of access points should
be minimized to reduce potential conflicts with traffic
movement as well as preserve the function of the corridor over
time. Minimum frontage of lots should be at least 200 feet
along M-134 for residential lots and 300 feet for commercial
lots.
As sewer is extended, it should be phased in a manner which
is consistent with the objectives of this Plan. The primary basis
for sewer extension in the past has been the need to correct
existing septic problems within the Township, particularly for
waterfront properties. This threat to the ground and surface
water quality within the Township should continue to be a
major factor in considering future sewer extensions. As
capacity warrants, extensions to accommodate new
development could also be provided.

Commercial Centers
The villages of Cedarville and Hessel, as centers of activity
within the Township, play a primary role in meeting the
shopping, business and social needs of both local and seasonal
residents alike. Both have a strong waterfront orientation
which continues to be a central point for much of the village's
activity. This recreational character is a unique component of
the village centers and contributes significantly to the charm
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-18

�and ambiance that they represent. Waterfront development
consists of a mix of uses, ranging from restaurants and resorts
to marinas and boat storage. While many resort communities
have similar waterfront orientations, the seasonal resort
nature of the islands in the Township provide an added
dimension to the role and function of these village centers. The
daily service needs of all Township residents continue to be
met by businesses located within or in proximity to these
villages.
The rural small town setting of the villages is characterized by
vintage tum of the century buildings, single family homes
converted to retail businesses and shops, as well as a mix of
retail activities. Many of the local community services are also
concentrated within or adjacent to village centers, including
the Township Hall, library, community center, high school and
churches.
The recommendations of this Plan have as their basic objective
the retention of these villages as centers of activity within the
Township. As business development occurs within the
Township it is critical that these activities remain concentrated
in and around the villages. In addition, new construction
should be of a style and scale which is complimentary to the
existing centers and the small town characteristics they
exhibit. One of the most unique advantages of Hessel and
Cedarville is their compact nature. Because of the islands and
their dependency on boat traffic, many seasonal residents are
less dependent on their automobiles. As a result, the
opportunity (and in fact the need) to encourage pedestrian
traffic through the villages is significantly greater than in many
rural communities. In order to maintain and enhance the
viability of Hessel and Cedarville as village centers over time,
this Plan focuses on capitalizing upon the physical advantages
that exist within each community and strengthening their
historical role within the Township by encouraging new
compact development which compliments and is consistent

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-19

.~

�W

with the unique characteristics of each village center. Specific
recommendations include:
1) Strengthening the waterfront character of each village.
This can be accomplished by improving parking
opportunities, continuing to upgrade boating facilities and
services, i.e., docking, restrooms and other public
facilities, improving public accessibility to and along
waterfront properties, and enhancing overall character
through landscaping, signage and building guidelines.
2) Creating improved parking opportunities within the
villages which can serve local and seasonal residents
needs, as well as tourists activity. Well located common
parking within easy walking distance of the waterfront
and local businesses would strengthen the role and
function of village centers.
3) Provide for convenient drop off zones on the waterfront
which allows boaters to leave their belongings at the
docks and park their autos elsewhere, away from the
waterfront.
4) Strengthen pedestrian linkages throughout the villages.
The waterfront, business district, shops, convenience
stores, recreation features and educational facilities
should all be linked by a walkway oriented to a
pedestrian environment.
5) New commercial or business activities should incorporate
and strengthen the pedestrian orientation of the village
centers. Signage, architecture, landscaping, lighting and
parking should be consistent with the objective of
maintaining a small town setting, which respects the
areas natural features and compliments the village
character.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-20

�Industrial and Mineral Extraction Activities
Industrial mineral extraction activities are located in the
eastern half of Clark Township and consist primarily of
limestone extraction operations. A rail line extending north and
south connects approximately 5700 acres of corporate land
with Port Dolomite, providing efficient transport of material
from point source to harbor. Mining activity has a long history
in Clark Township, creating a source of local revenue and
employment. At the present time, there are no corporate plans
to expand extraction operations beyond lands currently
classified as industrial.
Two other industrial areas exist and will be continued within
the Township; an area approximately 2 miles north of Hessel
and another area 1 / 4 mile north of Cedarville. The area north
of Hessel provides an alternative location for limited industrial
activities. Its close proximity to the airport, absence of
wetlands and a paved road are key features of this district.
Industrial land is also set aside in the area just north of
Cedarville. This area should be planned to accommodate
future industrial needs as they arise, however, compatibility
with future residential development must be assured.

Policy Statements

A Master Plan is composed of a series of important
components which compliment and build on each other,
including a Future Land Use Map, policies and implementation
mechanisms. When viewed in total, these components identify
the future, as well as a path to get there. One of the most
important components to proactive planning are plan policies.
Policies have several specific purposes as a component of the
plan, including:
1)
To serve as a foundation for subsequent planning
and zoning programs.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-21

r

�2)
3)

To serve as a unifying strategy toward achieving the
future desires of the Township residents.
To reaffirm or establish the special character and
components of individual community features and
special properties.

This Plan is written to provide assistance in making future
decisions on a wide range of land use, infrastructure and
public service issues. As a central component of this Plan, the
policies statements serve as guidelines intended to provide a
framework on which to base development decisions. These
statements are new tools to be employed by the Township and
will play a key role in guiding future public facility and
infrastructure decisions including creation of a capital
improvement program consistent with the Plan.

•

The Township should refer to these policies when establishing
priorities and evaluating development requests. Together with
the Goals and Objectives presented in Chapter 4, these
statements give even clearer direction toward steps that can be
taken to significantly increase the chances for successful
implementation of this Plan. Consequently, they also serve as a
foundation upon which to measure the success of this Plan's
implementation.
The statements which follow focus upon two areas: principal
land use policies of the Master Plan and specific policies
addressing special issues and opportunities within the
Township, including but not limited to transportation,
infrastructure and special land use areas.

Land Use
Recommended policies to guide implementation include:
Policy: Accommodate new residential, commercial and
industrial development in the Township provided it is:
1) in locations with services adequate to meet its
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-22

�l
.
needs, 2) respectful of environmental resources, 3)
consistent with the character of development in the
area, 4) consistent with approved land use plans, and
prevailing regulations, 5) consistent with the policies of
this Plan.
Policy: Encourage development throughout the Township
which reflects a pattern of use that is consistent with
retention of renewable resource lands, open spaces,
and avoidance of negative impacts upon
environmentally sensitive lands.
Policy: Review current management policies to determine if
they are adequate to protect environmentally sensitive
lands and what, if any, new policies or regulations may
be appropriate. This policy will entail a close
cooperative working relationship among property
owners, conservation interests, and various local
agencies having interest in these subjects. The
environmentally sensitive lands should be classified
according to levels of significance and techniques for
best management practices applied to achieve
conservation objectives.
Policy: Draw upon available existing studies and area
expertise to identify the current condition and quality
of surface and ground water. Factors contributing to,
or threatening water quality should be identified and
strategies developed for correction or avoidance of
water quality degradation, such as the generation of a
Township-wide stormwater management program.
Policy: Establish street and road construction specifications
that promote development consistent with the urban
and rural character sought to be achieved by this Plan.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-23

A

�•

Policy: Prepare a strategy upon which to build an economic
development program for the area.
Policy Ensure that all new development is properly managing
stormwater runoff to minimize off site impacts and all
county, state, and federal regulations regarding
stormwater management and soil erosion are satisfied.
Policy Encourage retention of vegetation along lakes, streams
and rivers as a natural filter in order to protect against
excessive runoff, soil erosion and sedimentation.

•

Policy: Prepare an updated recreation plan in cooperation with
private agencies and the state government which: 1)
identifies recreation needs in the community; 2)
establishes strategies and priorities to address the
needs; and 3) meets requirements to maintain
eligibility for funding from a variety of agencies .
Policy: As part of updating the Recreation Plan, identify all high
value recreational land, including water frontage
properties, and prepare strategies to acquire sites as

funds become available.
Policy: Develop a funding program for the purchase of
recreational lands where a need has been determined
or where a special opportunity exists.
Policy: Factors to be considered when acquiring additional
public lands for recreation or resource conservation
will be:
• enhancement of public, health, safety or welfare
• improvement of the quality of life of area residents
• protection of important natural resources and/ or
sensitive environments.
Policy: Mackinac County and Clark Township should jointly
prepare a County-wide recreation plan which includes
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-24

�a trail plan, biking and hiking opportunities linked to
retail, services, schools and recreation sites. These
trails should utilize state and federal properties where
ever appropriate.
Policy: Prepare and keep up-to-date a capital improvement
program for coordinating and programming extensions
of public facilities in accordance with the Master Plan.
Policy: Encourage ease of access to future recreation facilities
though the pursuit of a linked open space system,
siting recreation lands with recognition of existing and
future primary population centers, and facilitating
movement to and within future recreation facilities for
motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and the physically
disabled.
Policy: Improve and coordinate efforts with all levels of
government, with the quasi-public sector, and the
private sector to provide expanded and coordinated
recreational opportunities.
Policy: Increase public access opportunities to the waterfront
through property acquisition for the purpose of
providing a public beach and related recreational
activities.
Policy: Enhance existing public facilities on the waterfront;
including expansion of dock and public restroom
facilities.
Policy: Strive to provide additional recreational facilities within
Cedarville and Hessel which are within a reasonable
distance from the waterfront.
Policy: Pursue the evaluation of road ends for use by the
general public based upon the character of each, i.e.;
location, neighbors, size, current use, potential
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-25

I

�•

function, etc. Review the status of properties adjacent
to road ends for possible complementary use.

Rural/ Open Space
Policy: Create opportunities and incentives to encourage
residential development according to the open
space/ cluster zoning principals discussed in this Plan.
Policy: Encourage residential development which is
appropriately sited, landscaped, and setback from all
roadways, with the objective of maintaining the rural
character along all segments of the County road
network.

,.

Policy: Ensure any community sewer system within rural
areas satisfies all necessary state, county and local
permits, and the system is constructed according to
adopted standards by the Township to facilitate ease of
tie-in to potential future public systems and to ensure
adequate financial resources exist to maintain it.
Policy: Within rural districts, establish a hierarchy of
increases in lot width based on parcel size.
1 - 5 acres/ 200 ft
5.1 - 10 acres/330 ft
10.1 - 40 acres/660 ft
40 acres plus/ 1320 ft
Policy: Establish standards for private roads within
rural/ agricultural districts, with the objective of
satisfying minimum public safety requirements
associated with access to emergency vehicles, long
term maintenance and clear vision where it connects to
a public road.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-26

�7
Policy: Encourage all new development with the rural district
to preserve existing natural landscapes along streams,
rivers and road corridors.

I

Policy: Encourage retention of forested lands as an important
renewable resource within rural areas.
Policy: Ensure all on-site sewage disposal and potable water
facilities are constructed and maintained in
accordance with the requirements and standards of
the Mackinaw County Public Health Department and
Michigan Public Health Department.
Policy: Coordinate efforts with the Mackinac County Public
Health Department to ensure lot sizes are, at a
minimum, adequate to accommodate septic systems
(where public sewer is not available).
Policy: Ensure that land uses requiring state and/or federal
permits (especially for wetland or floodplain alterations)
do not receive final Township approval until
satisfactory evidence has been submitted verifying the
acquisition of all other necessary permits.
Policy: Permit a minimum lot size of one acre on lots in the
rural district when established consistent with the
State Subdivision Control Act or the Condominium Act
in a planned cluster development, otherwise the
minimum lot size permitted in this district is 10 acres.

Single Family Residential (Public Sewer Services District)
Policy: The average development density within a single family
district should be four dwelling units per acre, however
the actual permitted lot size may vary based upon the
presence or lack of sewers, type of road, number of
lots, amount of open space and sensitivity of natural
features.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-27

~
,-

~

�Policy: Encourage residential development which is
appropriately sited, landscaped, and setback from
roadways to incorporate a village or neighborhood
character when in subdivisions and a low density rural
character along segments of the County road network
within the Public Service District.
Policy: Encourage layout of residential development which is
designed to retain open spaces and protect natural
resource systems.
Policy: Encourage use of open space/P.U.D. zoning along with
traditional subdivision design.
Policy: Permit residential development along M-134 on
individual lots which maintain a minimum lot size of
40,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 200'.
Policy: Public sewer and water services should be limited to
the Public Service District unless the Township finds
such an extension is consistent with the Master Plan.
Policy: Encourage a phasing of sewer and/or water extensions
in a manner consistent with the policies of this Plan.
Policy: All land uses within the Public Services District must
be serviced by public sewer infrastructure, if available
adjacent to the property.

Waterfront Residential
Policy: Ensure that new development and redevelopment
within the Waterfront Residential District address, at a
minimum, consideration of a potable water supply,
safe disposal of sewage, land carrying capacities, water
quality protection, preservation of open space and

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-28

�minimal additional intrusion upon the natural
environment.
Policy: Development and redevelopment for residential use
should be permitted at a density of not less than 1
dwelling unit per acre where no public sewer is
available unless the Public Health Department requires
a lower development density due to larger required lot
areas for safe septic tank use. Where public sewer is
available, waterfront residential may occur up to 4
dwelling units per acre.
Policy: Development and redevelopment should preserve
existing public views of the lake to the extent possible
through sensitive site design.
Policy: Encourage building mass and scale consistent with
surrounding development and the natural
environment.
Policy: Encourage the retention of natural edges along the
lakefront of sufficient depth to preserve the existing
character of properties as viewed from the waterfront.
Policy: Principal buildings shall be setback from the water's _
edge a depth of 35 ft. and achieve an elevation at least
4 ft. or set back a depth of 100 ft. with an elevation at
least 3 ft. above the current high watermark.

Island Residential
Policy: Encourage preparation of a plan which addresses the
most efficient means of providing adequate levels of fire
and emergency services to existing and future island
residents.
Policy: Address mainland parking needs concurrent with new
residential development on the islands.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-29

�•

Policy: Encourage the adoption of special development criteria
for the islands based upon their ecological sensitivity, .
retention of existing natural character and the islands
physical carrying capacity.
Policy: The average density on the islands should be decreased
based upon the seasonal nature of the islands, the
limited availability ofpublic services, and the islands
ecologi,cal sensitivity. New density standards should be
developed based upon a specific evaluation of the
unique features of each island. Density levels could vary
between 1 dwelling unit on each acre to 1 dwelling unit
on 5 acres. Until such analysis is complete, the 1
dwelling unit per 1 acre standard should be used.

•

•

Commercial/Industrial Development
Policy: Encourage commercial and industrial development
within properly zoned areas subject to the following
conditions:
a) There are adequate public and/ or private services.
b) Access roads are paved.
c) . Access is regulated and designed to prevent
hazards and lot widths are not less than 300 feet
along M-134.
d) Stormwater runoff is adequately controlled as to
quality and quantity.
e) Access is available onto a class A road, as identified
by the County Road Commission, to ensure safe and
efficient.functioning and maintenance of the road
system over time.
Policy: Encourage new commercial and industrial
development to recognize the current rural character of
the Township and complement this character through
designs which utilize appropriate building scale,
materials, style, signage, yard etc.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-30

�Policy: Encourage new commercial and industrial
development to minimize intrusion upon the natural
environment.
Policy: New commercial and industrial development shall be
sensitive to adjacent residential zoned properties by
incorporating design techniques which minimize
potential negative impacts (e.g., fencing, buffering,
landscaping, etc.)
Policy: Ensure new industrial development is designed so as
to avoid conditions which will be detrimental to the
health, safety or welfare of persons or property through
excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, odor or
fumes.
Policy: Encourage the creation of cohesive village centers
within Hessel and Cedarville which are oriented to a
pedestrian environment and integrated with waterfront
activities.
Policy: Support the economic viability of existing commercial
businesses and encourage creation of compact village
centers which:
• are pedestrian oriented and aesthetically pleasing,
including walks and related amenities
• blend with the surrounding rural character
• includes continuing upgrading and redevelopment
• supports the policies of this Master Plan.
Policy: Encourage the creation of community parking districts
within Hessel and Cedarville which serve the dual
functions of satisfying the shortfall of parking for
island residents while at the same time providing
common parking to service retail business and shops.
These parking areas should be located near to the
waterfront but not on the waterfront. Drop off and

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-31

�pick-up areas should be established at waterfront
locations.

Transportation
Policy: Work with the Mackinac County Road Commission to
maintain and improve the Township roadway network,
as financial resources become available, based upon
the following guidelines:
a)
Roadway level of service.
b)
Functional classification of roads. The functional
importance of the various roads in the Township,
from highest to lowest, is as follows:
1.
state trunklines;
2.
county primaries;
3.
county locals;
4.
minor roads (subdivision roads).
c)
The degree to which the improvement is needed to
protect public health and safety or preserve or
achieve full use of existing facilities.
d)
The degree to which a project represents a logical
extension of existing roadways within an area of
the Township according to its intended use and
services level.

Policy: Proposed development projects with greater than
localized traffic impact should be analyzed in regard to
traffic impacts and roadway improvements.

LB:\ word \clark\plan \chap6b.doc
6/13/94

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
6-32

�Chapter 7 - STRATEGIES
FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Primary Implementation Tools

Relationship to Zoning
The Township has a zoning ordinance adopted pursuant to the
Township Rural Zoning Act, PA 184 of 1943 . The intent of this
ordinance is to regulate the use of land to provide for orderly
growth and development and allow the integration of land uses
without creating nuisances. The zoning ordinance defines land
use districts and regulates height, bulk, use, area of lot to be
covered, and open space to be preserved within each district.
Because the Zoning Enabling Act requires the zoning
ordinance be based upon the analysis contained in the Plan
prepared by the Planning Commission to guide future land use
decisions, the zoning ordinance should be revised to reflect this
Plan's new goals, policies, and future land use proposals.
However, the Zoning District Map and the Future Land Use
Map (see Map 6-3) will not be identical. The Zoning Map
typically reflects existing land use (where it is desirable to
continue it) and small areas zoned for more intensive use then
at present In contrast, the Future Land Use Map reflects land
use arrangements at some future time. (See Section 10.10, p .
245-250, Michigan Zoning &amp; Planning, 3rd Ed., by Clan
Crawford, ICLE, Ann Arbor, 1988).
The Township should continue to maintain a formal site plan
review process. Through this process applicants, in order to
obtain zoning approval, must submit plans which clearly
indicate how their development proposals will change and
affect both the parcel of land being developed as well as
surrounding properties.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-1

�Relationship To Plans/Zoning In Adjacent Jurisdictions
The land use proposals in this Plan were carefully prepared
with an eye to ensuring compatibility with adjoining township$.
Equal care should be taken in the future to seek and receive
comment on proposals that are on or near a border from an
adjoining jurisdiction. Failure to do so will only insure future
conflict over adjacent land uses, or the provision of new public
services.

•

•

Relationship to Subdivision Regulations
Clark Township should consider the adoption of subdivision
regulations. The enabling legislation that permits the
enactment of such regulations is Public Act 288 of 1967, also
known as the Subdivision Control Act of 1967. This Act allows
a community to set requirements and design standards for
streets, blocks, lots, curbs, sidewalks, open spaces, easements,
public utilities, and other associated subdivision
improvements. With the implementation of a subdivision
ordinance there would be added assurance that development
would occur in an orderly manner. In particular, the creation
of lots which would be unbuildable under existing state or local
regulations (such as lots which are wholly within a protected
wetland) should be prohibited. Condominium regulations
should also be enacted pursuant to the Condominium Act.

Relationship to Capital Improvements
In its basic form, a capital improvement program (CIP) is a
complete list of all proposed public improvements planned for
a 6 year period (the time span may vary), including costs,
sources of funding, location, and priority. The CIP outlines the
projects that will replace or improve existing facilities, or that
will be necessary to serve current and projected land use
development within a community.
Advanced planning for public works through the use of a CIP
assures more effective and economical capital expenditures, as
well as the provision of public works in a timely manner. The
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-2

�use of capital improvements programming can be an effective
tool for implementing the Master Plan by giving priority to
those projects which have been identified in the Plan as being
most important to the future development and well being of the
community. The Township Planning Commission should
develop a formal capital improvement program for approval by
the Township Board as part of the annual budgeting process.

Land Use &amp; Infrastructure Policies
A strong effort will be necessary to coordinate future capital
improvement decisions and land use policies with adjoining
units of government. As a result, proposed policy changes
should be circulated for comment early. Likewise, proposed
capital improvement programs should be prepared with
adequate time for review and comment by the adjoining
jurisdictions.

Community Participation and Education
In order to gain the support, acceptance, and input of area
residents for future planning, ongoing efforts should be
continued to provide information to them, and involve them in
the planning process. The importance of their role in that
process should be emphasized. Public acceptance will make
the implementation of plans much easier and public input
makes plans better and more responsive to local needs.

Special Area &amp; Financing Techniques

Building and Property Maintenance Codes
BOCA (Building Officials and Code Administrators
International, Inc.) is the basic building code adopted by the
Township to regulate construction methods and materials. The
adoption and enforcement of a building code is important in
maintaining safe, high quality housing and in minimizing
deteriorating housing conditions.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-3

~

�The Township should continue its utilization of the BOCA
Basic Housing - Property Maintenance Code as a basic
property maintenance code to regulate deteriorating influences
which result from failure to properly maintain property and
structures.

Community Development Block Grant Program
The Community Development Block Grant program was
authorized under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974. The Act had the effect of combining
several federal categorical grants such as Urban Renewal and
Model Cities into one. Grants under the program must
principally benefit low and moderate income families.
In Michigan there are two categories of eligible applicants:
entitlement and non-entitlement. Entitlement communities, by
meeting specific eligibility criteria, are given grant funds
outright without having to compete for them. Non-entitlement
applicants must compete for grant funds by applying through
the Michigan Small Cities Community Development Block
Grant Program. Clark Township is not an entitlement
community. Therefore, it must apply through the Small Cities
Program.
Operation of the Michigan CDBG Program is the responsibility
of the Michigan Department of Commerce with central
program administration by the Department's Office of Federal
Grant Management (OFGM). The Department of Commerce has
entered into an agreement with the Michigan State Housing
Development Authority (MSHDA) assigning administrative
responsibilities for the housing component of the program.
In the housing area, samples of grant eligible activities include:
• Home Improvement Programs

•

• Rental Rehabilitation Programs
• Weatherization and Energy Conservation
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-4

�• Home Repair for the Elderly
• Public improvement in conjunction with targeted housing
activity (limited to 25 percent of grant request)
• Housing Related Services
• Housing for the Homeless.
The maximum grant amount is $250,000. By applying and
obtaining a Small Cities Block Grant, the Township alone,
could establish a housing rehabilitation program which would
help preserve housing throughout the area.
The CDBG program also has the following categories of
assistance:
• Base Industrial Loan program helps financially viable
businesses needing financial assistance for growth,
modernization, or expansion. Limit $750,000.
• Commercial Retail Loan program is for commercial,
services, tourism, and other non-residential projects; and
minority owned and retail projects in distressed
communities. Limit $400,000.
• Public Infrastructure Assistance program funds public
improvements for the location and expansion of public
infrastructure. Limit $750,000.
• Downtown Development program provides financing to
assist businesses in the redevelopment of the downtown
area. Limit $500,000 or $300,000 for infrastructure
improvement.
• Communities in Transition program funds community
development activities, such as public sewer and water
systems, parks, bridges, roads, and comprehensive
redevelopment planning. Limit $400,000.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-5

�• Emergency Comm unity Assistance program funds
communities experiencing an imminent and urgent threat
to public health, safety, or welfare which occurred within
90 days of application. Limit: $500,000.

Michigan State Housing Development
Authority (MSHDA) Programs
To help preserve Michigan's older existing housing, Public Act
30 was passed in 1977 to allow MSHDA to begin a home
improvement loan program that offers reduced interest rates to
eligible low and moderate income families. MSHDA has created
the Home Improvement, Neighborhood Improvement and
Community Home Improvement Programs (HIP/NIP/CHIP). To
get a loan, residents should apply to one of the banks, savings
and loans, or credit unions that take part in HIP/NIP/CHIP.

Land and Water Conservation Fund
The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) grant program
was authorized by Public Law 88-578, effective January 1,
1965. The purpose of the program is to provide federal funds
for acquisition and development of facilities for outdoor
recreation. The LWCF Program is administered jointly by the
National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
All political subdivisions of the state, including school districts,
are eligible to participate in the program. Eligible projects
include:
1. Acquisition of land for outdoor recreation, including

additions to existing parks, forest lands, or wildlife areas.
2 . Development including, but not limited to such
facilities as: picnic areas, beaches, boating access, fishing
and hunting facilities , winter sports areas, playgrounds,
ballfields, tennis courts, and trails.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-6

�For development grants, the applicant must have title to the
site in question. The minimum grant allowable is $10,000 and
the For all grant proposals, the amount of the grant cannot
exceed more than 50 percent of the total project cost.

Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund
The Kammer Recreational Land Trust Fund Act of 1976 (Public
Act 204) passed in July 23 1976. This Act created the
Michigan Land Trust Fund. The program provided funds for
public acquisition of recreational lands through the sale of oil,
gas, and mineral leases and royalties from oil, gas, and
mineral extractions on state lands.
On November 6, 1984, Michigan residents cast their vote in
favor of Proposal B. This constitutional amendment created the
Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF), Public Act
101 of 1985, which officially replaced the Michigan Land Trust
Fund on October 1, 1985. MNRTF assists state and local
governments (including school districts) in acquiring land or
rights to land for recreational uses, protecting land because of
its environmental importance or scenic beauty, and developing
public recreational facilities.
Any individual, group, organization, or unit of government may
submit a land acquisition proposal, but only units of
government may take title to and manage the land. Only units
of government may submit development proposals. All
·
proposals for local grants must include a local match of at
least 25 percent of the total project cost. There is no minimum
or maximum for acquisition projects; for development projects,
the minimum funding request is $15,000, the maximum is
$375,000.

Costal Zone Management Fund
The Land &amp; Water Management Division of the Department of
Natural Resources offers grants for the purpose of planning,
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-7

rA

�designing, and carrying out low-cost projects to improve Great
Lakes shorelines and connecting waterways.

The Recreation Bond Fund
The Recreation Bond Fund draws from bonds approved by
voters in 1988. It calls for money to be spent on DNR and local
recreation facilities in four categories:
Recreation infrastructure: such as ballfields, tennis courts,
beaches and other shoreline areas, boat launches, trails, picnic
areas, historic structures, playgrounds, roads, parking,
restrooms, etc., which are not less than 15 years old;
Waterfront recreation: such as fishing piers, boardwalks,
boat launches, marinas, amphitheaters, landscaping, and
shoreline stabilization;
Community recreation: playgrounds, sportsfields, community
centers, senior centers, fishing sites, and trails for the
handicapped.
Tourism-enhancing recreation: including campgrounds,
boating facilities, historical sites, recreational conversion of
abandoned rights-of-way, and fishing access.

In its statewide inventory of recreational facilities, the DNR has
identified Mackinac County as deficient in a number of
recreational facilities. Those relevant for the County include
deficiencies in bicycle trails, fishing access, fishing piers, boat
launches, campgrounds, nature areas, hiking trails, nature
trails, cross country ski trails, picnic areas, and playgrounds.
Clark Township will get funding priority over similar projects
proposed in non-deficient counties. Table 7 .1 includes the
minimum number or size of selected recreation facilities to be
considered toward bond funding.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-8

�TABLE 7.1
RECREATION FACILITIES &amp; THEIR MINIMUM NUMBER OR SIZE
NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM POINTS
RECREATION FACILITY
Bicycle Trail
Playground
Swimming Beach
Boat Launch
Campground
Non-motorized Trail
Cross-country Skiing
Hiking
Nature
Horse
Fishing Access
Fishing Piers
Nature Area

MINIMUM SIZE
1 mile
3 pcs. of play equipment
50 feet
5 parking spaces
10 campsites
1/2 mile

50 feet
1
10 acres

NOTE: Points are not to be awarded separately for cross-country ski trails, nature
trails, and hiking trails. These trails are to be considered as one facility.
Source: DNR, Michigan's 1987-88 Recreation Action Program Guidebook.

Grant requests may not exceed $750,000 and may not be less
than $15,000. Applicants must match bond funds with 25% of
the total project cost, not including other state grants or
legislative appropriations. Bond money will only be allocated to
projects on sites controlled by public agencies. In the tourism
category, priorities are given to projects which: create new and
innovative recreation-related tourism attractions; involve
partnerships between the public and private sector; and
projects for which feasibility studies have been conducted
which demonstrate local, regional, and statewide economic
benefits. [Applications and further information may be
obtained from: DNR, Recreation Services Division, P.O. Box
30028, Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 373-9483.

Recreation Improvement Fund
The Recreation Improvement Fund was created from State fuel
tax revenue. About $750,000 per year is being targeted for
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-9

�development of non-motorized trails (hiking, bicycle, crosscountry, and nature trails) . No application forms or criteria
have yet been prepared, but the Recreation Division is
encouraging local governments to submit proposals based on
local determination of need, location, and financing.

Local Facility Development Grants
These grants come from a number of funding sources and are
available for planning, design, or development of local
recreational facilities. Currently, the principle fund source is
the Land and Water Conservation Fund administered by the
MDNR, Recreational Division.

Land Acquisition Grants
Land acquisition grants are available for projects aimed at
open space preservation; park creation or expansion;
acquisition of environmental resources such as sand dunes,
woodlots, or wetland areas; waterfront access sites; and many
other land acquisition projects intended for (passive or active)
recreational purposes. The Michigan Natural Resources Trust
fund was established for this purpose. Three primary criteria
are used in reponse to trust fund applications. They are:
quality of the land, a recreation needs assessment of the local
community, and the capability of the applicant to provide the
required 25% matching dollars. Further information can be
obtained from: MDNR Grant Management Branch, (517) 3739900.

Waterways Fund
The Waterways Division of the Department of Natural
Resources offers grants for the purpose of developing public
boating facilities . The emphasis is on creating boat access sites
and supporting facilities.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-10

-- - - -- - - -

--

�....

Road Funds
In 1987, three acts were passed to provide a new source of
revenue for cities, villages, and county road commissions. PA .
149 replaces Act 231, 233 and 237 by changing the State's
matching fund from 25% to 20%. The Act will be in effect for
five years, when it will be reviewed for continuation by the
legislature. Detailed information of PA 149 can be obtained
from MDOT's Transportation Economic Development Office at
(517)335-1069.
The Transportation Economic Development Fund allocates
money for the purposes of bringing county roads to all season
highway standards. This is important because heavy trucks
can only travel regularly on all season roads.
The Transportation Economic Development Act also offers
counties, cities, and villages the opportunity to compete for
additional funding on special projects with economic
development objectives. Competitive grants are awarded by the
State Highway Commission. Qualified project categories are
listed below:
(a) Economic development road projects in any of the
following targeted industries: agriculture or food
processing; tourism; forestry; high technology research;
manufacturing; office centers solely occupied by the
owner or not less than 50,000 square feet occupying
more than 3 acres of land.
(b) Projects that result in the addition of county roads or
city or village streets to the state trunk line system.
(c) Projects for reducing congestion on county primary
and city major streets within urban counties.
(d) Projects for development within rural counties on
county rural primary roads or major streets within
incorporated villages and cities with a population of less
than 5,000.
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-11

,--Q.

�~

·

Public Works Financing

In addition to using general fund monies, it is often necessary
for a community to bond to raise sufficient funds for
implementing substantial public improvements. Bonding offers
a method of financing for improvements such as water and
sewer lines, street construction, sidewalks, and public parking
facilities. Common municipal bond types include:
1. General Obligation Bonds - full faith and credit
pledges, the principal amount borrowed plus interest
must be repaid from general tax revenues.
2. Revenue Bonds - require that the principal amount
borrowed plus interest be repaid through revenues
produced from the public works project the bonds were
used to finance (often a water or sewer system).
3 . Special Assessment Bonds - require that the principal
amount borrowed plus interest be repaid through special
assessments on the property owners in a special
assessment district for whatever public purpose the
property owners have agreed (by petition or voting) to be
assessed.

Tax Incentives

The state law permitting communities to provide property tax
incentives for industrial development is Act 198. This Act
allows a community to provide tax abatements as an incentive
for industrial firms which want to renovate existing or build
new facilities.

-

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-12

�.....

Additional Recommendations

Other Planning &amp; Economic
Development Assistance
The Township Planning Commission should maintain regular
communication with the Eastern Upper Peninsula Planning &amp;
Development Regional Commission. This organization should
be encouraged to continue their County and region-wide
planning and economic development efforts and to share
relevant materials with the Township. Likewise a copy of this
Plan should be forwarded to this agency when adopted.
Pro-Business Alliance
One way to strengthen the Township's economic development
potential is to establish a pro-business exchange between
Cedarville and Hessel modeled after the Michigan Bell
Business Retention and Expansion Program. (Clark Township
is not eligible for participation in the Michigan Bell Business
Retention and Expansion program because it is not in a
Michigan Bell service area.) A pro-business exchange creates
an atmosphere of cooperation which benefits both the business
and the community.
The role of a pro-business exchange is to assist existing
businesses in finding solutions for their problems (i.e.
inadequate parking, expansion or relocation needs, etc.) and
help make new businesses feel welcome. The exchange would
work with area businesses to determine their needs and
appoint an ombudsman to inform new businesses of local
services and contacts. Businesses are often not aware of the
services available to them or who to contact for more
information. A brochure could be prepared which identifies
who to contact for information on zoning, construction,
planning, utilities, and taxation. The brochure could also
identify permit fees, tax and utility rates, and transportation,
delivery, freight, health, and financial services available in the
area.

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-13

�f-

Poverty
The changing economy, higher health care costs, higher
literacy and skills requirements for employees, and inflation
have seriously hurt the nation's poor, including the elderly on
fixed incomes. Social security benefits are the only retirement
income for about two-thirds of all American retirees, and an
estimated one million Michigan residents have no private or
public health insurance.
The poor are often overlooked in community development
efforts, yet they are the group most in need of public
assistance. According to the 1990 census, 11.7 percent of
Clark Township residents were living below the poverty level.
That's an annual income of less than $7,300 for those under
65, and $6,730 for those 65 and over.
The Township should continue to monitor the number of
people in poverty through the decennial census and other
special intermediate counts and work with local churches and
non-profit groups to assist them through food drives,
temporary shelters, or other needed services.

Public Open Space Acquisition
Programs to acquire public open space, especially along the
lake, should be initiated. One option is to create a local
nonprofit land conservancy. There are several very effective
ones operating in Michigan. Priority should be given to building
a trust fund for acquisition and maintenance or tying into
existing ones like the Nature Conservancy or Little Traverse
Conservancy and similar organizations. Initial acquisitions
should be of island and shoreline lands. These lands should
either be managed as independent Township holdings or in
common by a conservancy trust. Considerable additional
research and effort is needed .

•
CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-14

�Periodic Updating and Revisions
As these additional studies are undertaken the Master Plan
should be updated to reflect the new information. At a
minim um the Plan should be comprehensively reviewed and
updated at least once every five years.

Managing Growth and Change
The key to successfully managing future growth and
community change is integrating planning into day-to-day
decision making and establishing a continuing planning
process. The only way to get out of a reactionary mode (or
crisis decision making) is by planning and insuring the tools
available to meet a broad range of issues are current and at
hand. For that reason it will be especially important that the
recommendations of this Plan be implemented as the
opportunity presents itself (or revised as circumstances
dictate).
Many new tools may be made available to local governments
over the next few years to manage the growth and change
process. It will be a challenge to Township officials to pick from
among the new tools, those that will provide greater choice
over local destiny and quality of life.

Revision of Ordinances
Clark Township's zoning ordinance should be reviewed and
made consistent with this Plan. If this is not done then the
legal support for future zoning decisions is undermined. Of
course, the Plan itself could also be changed so that there is
greater consistency between the Plan and zoning regulations,
but if that is done, the supporting logic and data should also
be included. Likewise, subdivision regulations should also be
adopted and maintained along with a capital improvement
program as mentioned earlier in the chapter.
LB\word\clark\chap7b.doc
5/2/94

CLARK TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN
7-15

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007407">
                <text>Clark-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan_1994</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007408">
                <text>Clark Township Planning Commission, Clark Township, Mackinac County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007409">
                <text>1994-07-08</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007410">
                <text>Clark Township Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007411">
                <text>The Clark Township Comprehensive Plan was prepared by the Clark Township Planning Commission with the assistance of the Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. with both July 7 and July 8 of 1994 listed as plan dates.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007412">
                <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc. (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007413">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007414">
                <text>Clark Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007415">
                <text>Mackinac County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007416">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007418">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007419">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007420">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1007421">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038268">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="28720" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31212">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4c4d242e2ecb79ef9664ecb0b9d332c0.mp4</src>
        <authentication>7391cda8ece607480f011cd9cd509c86</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="31213">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9839d182d895c60533b3c6e9b128f0de.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f6f2e2973c384f79e9ee092d4eee589b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="536164">
                    <text>Grand Valley State University
Veterans History Project
Donald Lee Clark
(00:46:10)

(00:10) Introduction
• Born in Tacoma, Washington.
• Father served in army during World War II.
• Moved to Lansing, Michigan after the war.
• Member of the swim team during high school.
• Quit school when he was 17 years old.
(07:16) Enlistment/ Training
• Sent to Parris Island.
• Wished to join the Navy, but his score of 98% was “too low” to join.
• The men would wake at 5 a.m. for a 5-mile run. (09:40)
• The food was very good.
• Rations were dated from 1942.
• Joined in 1962.
• Member of the Marine Reserves for a month before being sent to Basic training.
• He was a truck driver, transporting 105mm guns.
(15:15) Vietnam
• Took a ship to Vietnam, landed in Chu Lai.
• Continued to drive truck during Vietnam.
• Carried the guns and men who fired them.
• Guarded Chu Lai while the air base was being built.
• Training happened stateside, no training in Vietnam.
• Landing strip on air base was built in a month.
• Stayed in Chu Lai for three months, then sent back stateside.
(20:18) Stateside
• Drove a jeep out of Camp Lejeune, escorting Lieutenants and Generals.
• Active military until 1966.
• Before he left for Vietnam, he went on a Marine cruise in the Mediterranean.
• Never saw a lot of combat, even in Vietnam.
(22:50) Impression of Vietnamese people
• Thought they were different.
• He remembers them acting suspicious.
(23:38) Before Vietnam

�•
•
•
•
•

Sent on ship in blockade of Cuba.
Remained in Cuban waters for a month.
Stationed in Hawaii for 18 months.
Continued driving truck in Hawaii.
Remembers volcanic explosions, having to help civilians.

(34:14) Post Service Life
• Was discharged from Camp Lejeune.
• Came home to Lansing.
• Worked at a garage.
• Did not tell anyone that he was a Vietnam veteran.
• Met his first wife in 1967.
• Had two daughters.
• Worked at Oldsmobile for 7 years, then drove truck.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="496643">
                  <text>Veterans History Project</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565780">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. History Department</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565781">
                  <text>The Library of Congress established the Veterans History Project in 2001 to collect memories, accounts, and documents of U.S. war veterans from World War II and the Korean War, Vietnam War, and conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere, and to preserve these stories for future generations. The GVSU History Department interviews are part of this work-in-progress, and may contain videos and audio recordings, transcripts and interview outlines, and related documents and photographs.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565782">
                  <text>1914-</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565783">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565784">
                  <text>Afghan War, 2001--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765929">
                  <text>Iran Hostage Crisis, 1979-1981--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765930">
                  <text>Korean War, 1950-1953--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765931">
                  <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765932">
                  <text>Oral history</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765933">
                  <text>Persian Gulf War, 1991--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765934">
                  <text>United States--History, Military</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765935">
                  <text>United States. Air Force</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765936">
                  <text>United States. Army</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765937">
                  <text>United States. Navy</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765938">
                  <text>Veterans</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765939">
                  <text>Video recordings</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765940">
                  <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="765941">
                  <text>World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565785">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565786">
                  <text>Smither, James&#13;
Boring, Frank</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="46">
              <name>Relation</name>
              <description>A related resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565787">
                  <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565788">
                  <text>RHC-27</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565789">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="565790">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project interviews (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="4">
      <name>Oral History</name>
      <description>A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536140">
                <text>Clark, Donald L. (Interview outline and video), 2007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536141">
                <text>Clark, Donald L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536142">
                <text>Donald Lee Clark, of Tacoma Washington, served in the United States Marine Corps during the Vietnam War, from 1962 to 1966. He was a member of the Marine Reserves before being sent to Marine basic training. He worked as a truck driver for the marines both stateside and while serving in Vietnam. Clark worked as part of a guard on the Chu Lai airbase in Vietnam while it was being built. Before Vietnam, he was sent to Cuban waters in the aftermath of the Bay of Pigs incident.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536143">
                <text>Collins Sr., Charles E. (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536144">
                <text> Collins, Carol (Interviewer)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536146">
                <text>Oral history</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536147">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536148">
                <text>United States--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536149">
                <text>Michigan--History, Military</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536150">
                <text>Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536151">
                <text>United States. Marine Corps</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536152">
                <text>Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536153">
                <text>Video recordings</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536154">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536155">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en"&gt;In Copyright&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536156">
                <text>Moving Image</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="536157">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536162">
                <text>Veterans History Project (U.S.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="536163">
                <text>2007-02-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547499">
                <text>ClarkD</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567262">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/455"&gt;Veterans History Project Collection, (RHC-27)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="794737">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="796802">
                <text>video/mp4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1030857">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
